Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Council Agenda 010617CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS COUNCIL AGENDA Friday, January 6, 2017 6:00 P.M. Mayor Tinsley Vice Mayor Jablin Councilmember Premuroso Councilmember Marino Councilmember Woods I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. ROLL CALL III. RESOLUTIONS: a. RESOLUTION 12, 2017 — INFRASTRUCTURE ONE -CENT SALES TAX PROPOSAL. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA; ADOPTING A FORMAL POLICY AND PLAN FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF THE ONE -CENT INFRASTRUCTURE SALES SURTAX; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. b. RESOLUTION 13, 2017 — FUTURE ANNEXATION PROPOSAL. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA ACCEPTING THE "ANNEXATION AREAS OF INTEREST STUDY" FOR FUTURE ANNEXATION AREAS; DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO CONTINUE WITH THE "ANNEXATION AREAS OF INTEREST STUDY" AS POLICY GUIDANCE FOR THE ANNEXATION INITIATIVE, CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 171, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. IV. ITEMS FOR COUNCIL ACTION/DISCUSSION: V. ADJOURNMENT PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any interested party wishes to appeal any decision made by the City Council with respect to any matter considered at this public hearing, such interested parties will need a record of the proceedings and may need to ensure that a verbatim record is made, including the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 286.26, Florida Statutes, persons with disabilities needing special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding are entitled to the provision of certain assistance at no cost. Please call the City Clerk's Office at 561-799-4122 no later than five (5) days prior to the hearing if this assistance is required. For hearing impaired assistance, please call the Florida Relay Service Numbers: 800-955-8771 (TDD) or 800-955-8770 (VOICE). NOTE: All presentation materials must be received by the City Clerk prior to the presentation to the Council. Please Print Name: COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City. Council 0a41;s6,1 -IOj 106,14 (�:6VV-12ch.--- Addres,s: I-�-- l c�� � — �g L/ f City: Subject: Members of the public may address the'City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. ---COMMENTS ROM THE PUB _ Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: rareK-,- Addres,s: - f. City: Subject: RdUA aO t Members of the public may address the -City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Requok to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Comments From The Public Request to Address City Council Please Pri Name: Address: City: Subject: Vj5d &*41 13, a011 �ith(t Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" Portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. CONEVIENTS FROM THE PUBLIC . REQUEST TO ADDRESS CITY COUNCIL PLEASE PRINT NANTE: tc-� ADDRESS: 0�o (.�J CITY: tQ- VA c� fq SUBJECT: IZ% 13 1. �b 17 ITEM ON THE AGENDA: YES: !�Z_ NO: "II Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" and "Public Hearings" portions of the agenda. This request to address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the item. Each speaker will be given three (3) minutes and is limited to one (1) comment card per Agenda Item. Separate comment cards must be filled out for each specific Agenda Item about which you wish to speak. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC. REQUEST TO ADDRESS CITY COUNCIL PLEASE PRINT Q K, ►�1 �'� ADDRESS: 1 k © A kWr-r iA CITY: 6.,, U ZIP: SUBJECT: S /a , oxf % ITEM ON THE AGENDA: YES: NO: Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" and "Public Hearings" portions of the agenda. This request to address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the item. Each speaker will be given three (3) minutes and is limited to one (1) comment card per Agenda Item. Separate comment cards must be filled out for each specific Agenda Item about which you wish to speak. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC REQUEST TO ADDRESS CITY COUNCIL PLEASE PRINT NAME: .n pp T� ADDRESS: �S� '�" 6 A A) 6 CITY: ZIP: SUBJECT: i; Apt 5,'J.ZS Q/2jS4/*%)Tft0A✓ R6 tA- .4.0 1 '1 1 ITEM ON THE AGENDA: YES: -k NO: Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" and "Public Hearings" portions of the agenda.. This request to address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the item. Each speaker will be given three (3) minutes and is limited to one (1) comment card per Agenda Item. Separate comment cards must be filled out for each specific Agenda. Item about which you wish to speak. Please r- Name Address: Subject: V-e Comments From The Public Request to Address City Council f7or 1 9- - Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" Portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: VVMIVIENTS FROM -THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council V(; Address: -� . �-Ln C1�1 n L..) City: •C .�'1 3� �- Subject: f Members of the public may address the'City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for.each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. -- -- --_--- -- -- MMENTS ROM T-HE-PUBLIC - -- - Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: Address City. - Subject: _. Ego e Members of the public may address the'City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. COMNIEENTS FROM THE PUBLIC. REQUEST TO ADDRESS CITY COUNCIL e PLEASE PRINT NAME: G -�'c� iw (C Kam - ADDRESS: j � C4- CITY: ZIP: 33�� SUBJECT:�- ITEM ON THE AGENDA: YES: -e�'NO: Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public' and "-Public Hearings" porfions of the agenda. This request to address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the item. Each speaker will be given three (3) minutes and is limited to one (1) comment card per Agenda Item. Separate comment cards must be filled out for each specific Agenda Item about which you wish to speak. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC REQUEST TO ADDRESS CITY COUNCIL PLEASE PRINT Nam: R S�}(Zv-,Djz ADDRESS: [UN-3 S,`zN)- 0� A Ctrs CITY: SUBJECT: ITEM ON THE AGENDA: YES: -�- NO: Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" and "Public Hearings" portions of the agenda. This request to address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the item. Each speaker will be given three (3) minutes and is limited to one (1) comment card per Agenda Item. Separate comment cards must be filled out for each specific Agenda Item about which you wish to speak. Comments From The Public Please Print Name: Address Request to Address City Council nm City: ?/3C? F% Subject: C- ? / /c L 4 1-.41:J O A A je, /tA a, G .,/ �c Rid �toe, rw— Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" Portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. JTHE PUBLIC -- -- -- Request to Address City Council Please Print VIO Name: Address: " City: Subject: Lin,x- Members of the public may address the"City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. ---------- --- -----COMMENTS ROM --- Request to Address City Council Please Print 00 { �- Name: J ©'s fl / VI Addresss: City: Subject: Members of the public may address the -City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. COMMENTS FROM TfE PUBLIC. �Q'+" 1� REQUEST TO ADDRESS CITY COUNCIL PLEASE PRINT NANV.IE: 7� ADDRESS: CITY: T —6 SUBJECT: S s zip: 33 I - // . I 7-���L\,Jo L; ITEM ON THE AGENDA: YES: NO: Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" and "Public Hearings" portions of the agenda. This request to address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the item. Each speaker will be given three (3) minutes and is limited to one (1) comment card per Agenda Item. Separate comment cards must be filled out for each specific Agenda Item about which you wish to speak. _--- Request to Address City Council Please Print r_ . Name: K�`- I,ryEat 40--acx- Members of the public may address the*City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion bf the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: Address: COMMENTS �R M THE PUBLIC S Request to Address City Council �y j ' S U Z Z City: _' Q Subject: 8 ��N i 1-1 Members of the public may address the'City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. -__ ----G MMENTS ROM TH PUB IG --- Request to Address City. Council Please Print Name: Address: City: Subject: iw� movah plc Members of the public may address the'City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Subject: Please Print Name: Addres,s: - C-OMME S ROM THE71 UBL- IC Request to Address City Council Cow. (Vvr-� City: 6 (i- , S3 q t 1�1 0, � � cea'z Dri�raL�r-1 t leg r Members of the public may address the*City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. --- -- --- VVMMENTS FROM-TH—E—PUBLIC Request to Address City. Council Please Print �� 1 Name: aokn -t leers Fc:-�d^ Addres,s: l o a �.- '7"G� ✓�= St�o _ -CUT ---T- City: Subject: Members of the public may address the'City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. -- --- --- _ - -- --- OMMENTS R M Please Print -- Request to Address City. Council - Name: Addres,s: - �b�r� I15f- i 3 City: `` nn II Mn e n •.n Subject: W6,��C �� to 5v 6A v�Y-6t� � or�5 maw► tt Members of the public may address the -City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. R M THE PUBL�[C ---- Request to Address City. Council Please Print Name:1�, Address: _a ) :7 ✓ �� b, City: 1 Subject: dC, Members of the public may address the'City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. ROM Request to Address City Council Please Print (4 Name: ! ' 1© t �` Address: ,r c _e, 7) r°• City: o Subject: ZIA C) f- Members of the public may address the -City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. COMMENTS ROM F T HE -PUBLIC Request to Address City Council . Please Print ll Name: �lVI d/.+2h/ Addres,s: City: Subject: So. c- ` ��✓ •TIC �\e .c� ►.� �- 4-L o� T e `-'► f� y-c� ?J .. . '�p i G p�, /'� t/�.slli�'� � ✓ !N'O ✓� � •�R✓�+� S C> LtiC�.+t � 1�A �•iA air K 1 �.�! Members of the public may address the*City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Requesi to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for.each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. -------^--- -- --COMMENTS ROM THE—PUBEIC---- ------ Request to Address City Council l� Please Pr' t ) Name: Addres,s: • 2-16 city: J UP tTE IZ AFL 334 bject: L EL� S - ,r y. Members of the public may address the*City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. COMAIENTS FROM THE PUBLIC . REQUEST TO ADDRESS CITY COUNCIL -2 JV# PLEASE PRINT NAME: ADDRESS: 1 iz- q7 p CITY: �1 (Q ��, ZIP: SUBJECT:L ITEM ON THE AGENDA: YES: NO: Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" and "Public Hearings" portions of the agenda. This request to address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the item. Each speaker will be given three (3) minutes and is limited to one (1) comment card per Agenda Item. Separate comment cards must be filled out for each specific Agenda Item about which you wish to speak. -- - _ --- -------Go—MMENTS ROM IHE PUBLIC ------- - Request to Address City. Council Please Print Name: Addres,p; - IV City: Subject: Members of the public may address the -City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda anti during "Public Hearings". This Requesf to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeff ng. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print GpffMENTS ROM TLHE—�UBU Request to Address City Council O\ Name: Address: ; _'"Goo Syr2 -�--r T' _ City: Subject: 4� J�d A.,a /C " t t . Members of the public may address the -City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. CONIlVIENTS FROM THE PUBLIC . REQUEST TO ADDRESS MY COUNCIL PLEASE PRINT ADDRESS: CITY: SUBJECT: RLSetv,� a� La ITEM ON THE AGENDA: YES: \ / NO: �� N Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public' and "Public Hearings" portions of the agenda. This request to address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the item. Each speaker will be given three (3) minutes and is limited to one (1) comment card per Agenda Item. Separate comment cards must be filled out for each specific Agenda Item about which you wish to speak. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC . REQUEST TO ADDRESS CITY COUNCIL PLEASE PRINT NAME: Olm � 6 11 � S ADDRESS: CITY: SUBJECT: ITEM ON THE AGENDA: YES: V/ NO: 05 P Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" and "Public Hearings" portions of the agenda. This request to address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the item. Each speaker will be given three (3) minutes and is limited to one (1) comment card per Agenda Item. Separate comment cards must be filled out for each specific Agenda Item about which you wish to speak. COMMENTS EOM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council . Please Print Name: Addres,s: ; City: Subject: p"M . qw,R Members of the public may address the*City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: January 5, 2017 Resolution 12, 2017 SubjectlAgenda Item: Approving the City of Palm Beach Gardens' Infrastructure One - Cent Sales Surtax Pr000sal. Recommendation to APPROVE Recommendation to DENY Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $33,000,000 Council Action: Finance (Total) [ ]Approved Allan Owens $ p [ ]Approved w/ Finance Administrator Current FY Conditions 4Att Funding Source: [ ]Denied [ ] Continued to: an, Esq. Advertised: Attachments: Date: [ ] Operating Paper: [ X] Other One -Cent Infrastructure Sales Resolution 12, 2017 Submitted by: Surtax Depaart[D men irector / [XI Not Required Contract/Agreement: et �il_ Allan Owens Effective Date: N/A Expiration Date: NIA Affected parties Budget Acct.#:312. [ ] Notified X.X.6900 Approved by: City [X] Not required Wgeir Rona Meeting Date: January 5, 2017 Resolution 12, 2017 Page 2 of 6 BACKGROUND: This Resolution adopts a formal policy and plan for the expenditure of the recently approved One -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax. This plan includes approval of the capital improvement projects to be funded with the new tax; establishment of a new Budget Oversight Review Board to comply with the requirement of independent citizen oversight of the use of these funds; approval of the issuance of a Not -to -Exceed $30,000,000 Capital Improvement Revenue Bond, Series 2017, to facilitate and expedite the construction of the projects; and amending the Fiscal Year 2017 Budget to reflect anticipated One -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax proceeds and the proposed spending and financing plan. Overview On November 8, 2016, Palm Beach County voters approved a ballot issue to enact a One -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax to pay for acquisition or improvements to public infrastructure. This additional tax, which went into effect January 1, 2017, will be in place for up to ten (10) years, and is projected to raise approximately $2.69 billion for infrastructure investment, repairs, renovations, or improvements, and is to be shared among Palm Beach County, the Palm Beach County School District, and the thirty-nine (39) Palm Beach County municipalities. The estimated proceeds of the tax will be allocated among these entities based on the following distribution formula: 10-'Year Entity/Agency Percentage Annual Amount Amount (With 3% Revenue Increase) Palm Beach County 30% $ 68.3 million $807.4 million Palm Beach County Public School 50 °7o $113.9 $1.345 billion District million Palm Beach County Municipalities (39) 20% $ 45.8 $537.6 million million TOTAL ��1$228 million $2.69 billion Meeting Date: January 5, 2017 Resolution 12, 2017 Page 3 of 6 The City of Palm Beach Gardens' estimated annual and ten (10) year allocations of the Cane -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax proceeds are illustrated in the following table: City of Palm Beach Gardens Distribution Percentage 1.3216% (of $228 million) 10 Years 10 Years 1 year (No Revenue Increase) (3%'Revenue Increase) $3,012,492 $30,124,923 $35,570,894 Citizen Oversiaht The ballot question approved by the voters required independent oversight of the disbursement of the One -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax by citizen committees. To comply with this requirement, the City of Palm Beach Gardens will be modifying the existing Budget Oversight Committee by enacting enabling legislation (Ordinance 5, 2017) that will create a Budget Oversight Review Board. The powers and duties of the Board shall be set forth in the Ordinance, and include oversight of the expenditure of the One -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax to ensure compliance with statutory rules and regulations governing the use of the funds. Proposed Capital Improvement Plan Staff has been reviewing current and long-term infrastructure needs of the City to formulate a recommended plan for the expenditure of the One -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax. This analysis included input from many sources, including senior staff from all departments, the consultant that has been working on a long-term space -needs analysis, the City's current budget and long-range capital improvement plans, and the results of the most recent Citizen Survey. Based on a thorough analysis and discussion among staff and the City's consultant, a plan was formulated that would address current and projected shortages of office, meeting, and storage space; current and future parks and recreation needs; and long- term maintenance needs associated with the expansion of City facilities on land to be dedicated to the City from Avenir. Meeting Date: January 5, 2017 Resolution 12, 2017 Page 4 of 6 Based on this analysis, the following schedule of capital improvement projects was developed that are recommended to be funded with the Cane -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax: Proposed Cane -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax Projects District Park - Land Purchase and Phase I Development $ $11,200,000 Baseball Complex Expansion 2,500,000 City Hall Renovations/Expansion 7,020,000 PD Renovations 2,098,305 FS1 Renovations 100,000 Operations Center 6,697,230 Total $ $29,615,535 While none of these projects is in the current Five- (5) Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), they would have been recommended for inclusion soon. Assuming they would be added to the CIP, the issue would be how to pay for them. The options for funding the projects would be limited to the following: Pay -As -You -Go — This would be the least desirable option, as it would require either cutting other existing items from the CIP, or using the City's reserves. These projects could not be funded at one time, as it would totally deplete the City's reserves. If the items were to be budgeted in phases as funds become available in the City's Budget, it would add substantially to the overall cast, as this method would take an extremely long time to achieve, resulting in significant inflationary increases in construction costs. 2. Financing in Phases — It is possible that these projects could be accomplished in phases, with the City issuing a separate bond for construction of each phase. This option would result in increased borrowing costs, as the Federal Reserve has already enacted a recent increase in interest rates and has indicated several more rate hikes will be enacted in 2017. Meeting Date. January 5, 2017 Resolution 12, 2017 Page 5 of 6 3. Finance Entire Project — This is the most desirable option, as it would lock in financing at today's interest rates and secure 100% of the funds necessary to execute contracts at today's costs. This would result in significant overall savings and could offset most, if not all, of the interest expense associated with the bond. The problem with all the above options is that, without a dedicated funding source, Ad Valorem Taxes would be required to either budget and appropriate for these items on a pay-as-you-go basis in the Five- (5) Year CIP, or to pay the annual debt service if the money was borrowed. These factors make the recently approved One -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax a once -in -a -lifetime opportunity to address significant current and future infrastructure needs of the City and its residents while using non -ad valorem tax dollars. Proposed Funding To facilitate the construction of these projects in the timeliest and most cost-efficient manner, staff is recommending that Council approve the issuance of a Not -to -Exceed $30,000,000 Capital Improvement Revenue Bond, Series 2017. Borrowing funds will significantly shorten the expected time frame for completion of the projects, and additionally will take advantage of current low interest rates and lock in construction costs at today's dollars, resulting in overall lower costs. Debt service on this issue would be approximately $3.3 million annually for a ten- (10) year period and would not begin until October 1, 2017, thus allowing the City to defer the first payment for almost a year. The debt service would be repaid with the One -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax proceeds, which, assuming a 3% growth rate in the revenues, would completely cover the debt service in four (4) years. Staff has had discussions with the City's financial advisor and bond counsel, and has developed the following tentative timeline that would result in the Bond closing on February 28, 2017: January 4 Comments Due on Bond Resolution January 9 Distribute final RFP (Include Bond Resolution as attachment) February 2 Council Meeting — Approve Financing via Delegated Award February 3 RFP Responses Due Meeting Date: January 5, 2017 Resolution 12, 2017 Page 6 of 6 February 10 Finalize Selection of Loan Provider February 10 Distribute first draft of Loan Agreement/Closing Documents February 22 Comments due on Loan Agreement/Closing Documents February 27 Pre -Closing February 28 Closing Pending City Council approval of this recommended plan for the use of the One -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax, staff would prepare the necessary budget amendment ordinance for first reading in February. This amendment would record the anticipated One -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax proceeds to be received in Fiscal Year 2017: record the proceeds from the issuance of the Not -to -Exceed $30,000,000 Capital Improvement Revenue Bonet, Series 2017; and establish the project budget in a new One -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax Capital Improvement Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Resolution 12, 2017 as presented. 1 RESOLUTION 12, 2017 2 3 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM 5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA; ADOPTING A FORMAL POLICY AND 6 PLAN FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF THE ONE -CENT 7 INFRASTRUCTURE SALES SURTAX; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE 8 DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. 9 10 11 WHEREAS, on November 8, 2016, Palm Beach County voters approved a ballot 12 issue to enact a One -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax to pay for acquisition or 13 improvements to public infrastructure; and 14 15 WHEREAS, the City Council desires to adopt a formal policy and plan for the 16 expenditure of the recently approved One -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax; and 17 18 WHEREAS, this proposed policy and plan include approval of the capital 19 improvement projects to be funded with the new tax; establishment of a new Budget 20 Oversight Review Board to comply with the requirement of independent citizen oversight 21 of the use of these funds; approval of the issuance of a Not -to -Exceed $30,000,000 22 Capital Improvement Revenue Bond, Series 2017, to facilitate and expedite the 23 construction of the projects; and amending the Fiscal Year 2017 Budget to reflect 24 anticipated One -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax proceeds and the proposed spending 25 and financing plan; and 26 27 WHEREAS, this additional tax, which went into effect January 1, 2017, will be in 28 place for up to ten (10) years, and is projected to raise approximately $2.69 billion for 29 infrastructure investment, repairs, renovations, or improvements, and is to be shared 30 among Palm Beach County, the Palm Beach County School District, and the thirty-nine 31 (39) Palm Beach County municipalities; and 32 33 WHEREAS, the City Council deems approval of this Resolution to be in the best 34 interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the residents and citizens of the City of Palm 35 Beach Gardens and the public at large. 36 37 38 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 39 OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA that: 40 41 SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and ratified. 42 43 SECTION 2. The City Council hereby adopts a formal policy and plan for the 44 expenditure of the recently approved One -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax. 45 46 SECTION 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. Page 1 of 2 Resolution 12, 2017 1 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 16 ATTEST. 11 12 13 BY° 14 Patricia Snider, CMC, City Clerk 15 16 17 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND 18 LEGAL SUFFICIENCY 19 2© 21 BY: 22 R. Max Lohman, City Attorney 23 24 25 26 27 28 VOTE: 29 30 MAYOR TINSLEY 31 32 VICE MAYOR JABLIN 33 34 COUNCILMEMBER PREMUROSO 35 36 COUNCILMEMBER MARINO 37 38 COUNCILMEMBER WOODS 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 day of 2U17. CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 1-mv Marcie Tinsley, Mayor AYE NAY ABSENT 47 G.lattorney_sharelRESOLUTIONS120171Resolution 12 2017-Infrastructure ONe-Cent Sales Surtax Proposal.docx Page 2 of 2 00-1 PALM BEACH MEMORANDUM CITY GP PALM BEACH GARDENS TO: Ronald M. Ferris, City Manager FROM: Elicia K. Sanders, Assistant to the City Manager ` , , _ SUBJECT: Public Opinion Regarding use of Taxpayer Funds DATE: December 20, 2016 As the City finalizes its formal policy and plan for the expenditure of the recently voter approved One -Cent Infrastructure Sales Surtax, it is timely to examine data that reflects the public's opinion on what they view as priorities and best uses of taxpayer funds. With 91% of the City's residents having never attended a City Council meeting, it is important to examine the data derived from surveys, such as the City's 2015 Resident Opinion Survey, to ensure the City is meeting the needs and expectations of the majority of its residents. In addition to the findings from the City's 2o15 Resident Opinion Survey, the data in the November, 2o16, ALA Build America Summit Public Opinion Poll featured in Retrofit Magazine (December 7, 2o16) should be factored into the conversation. Each of these surveys examined what taxpayers view as priorities for investments in their communities. The data from the City's survey and the AIA survey finds that: a 94% say that having well -maintained public buildings are important to the future of their community. • 83% consider public buildings part of their community's infrastructure. 7 in 10 want their public buildings renovated. • 13% of residents would like to see improvements to the police and fire departments, up 7 percentage points from 2oo+6. • g in io residents say that parks and recreation services the City provides are vital to the community, up S percentage points from goof. • 79% of residents favor more green space bought with their local tax dollars, up 8 percentage points from 2oo6. • 13% of residents state the top reason for living in Palm Beach Gardens is the recreational opportunities, with 6% stating it is the number one reason for living in Palm Beach Gardens. 87% agree that community engagement is stronger when public buildings are well maintained. In conclusion, the results of the City's 2015 survey, coupled with additional data such as the ALA survey results, demonstrate a clear public desire to invest in public buildings, public green space, and maintain the practices and policies of enhancements to public recreation. CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: January 5, 2017 Resolution 13, 2017 SUBJECTIAGENDA ITEM Acceptance of the "Annexation Areas of Interest Study" for future annexation areas and directing the City Manager to implement the "Annexation Study" as policy guidance for the annexation initiative that is consistent with Chapter 171, Florida Statutes. [X] Recommendation to APPROVE [ ] Recommendation to DENY Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Finance: Council Action: Direct r tanning & Planning & Zoning: Accountant [ ] Approved Zoni Pr 'eet M Hager NIA [ ] Approved wl / Conditions #a ie . Crowley, AICP ail, Tresha Thomas [ ] Denied Allyson Black [ ] Continued Fees Paid: NIA to. Development Compliance NIA [ ] Quasi — Judicial Funding Source: [ ] Legislative Bahareh Wolfs, AICP [X] Public Hearing [ ] Operating Advertised: [X] Other NIA Attachments: Ci + Resolution 13, 2017 [ ]Required Budget Acct.#: - Exhibit "A°: [X] Not Required MIA Annexation Areas of R. Max Lohman, Esq. +ContractsIA-greements: Interest Study U Approved By: 'Effective Date: NIA City M ger Affected parties: ] Notified Expiration Date: Ronald . F ris [X] Not Required NIA Meeting Date: January 5, 2017 Resolution 13, 2017 Page 2 of 2 BACKGROUND Annexation is part of the City's sustainable growth strategy. Annexation is a tool to increase the City's revenue, to compact its boundaries, to utilize tax dollars in the most efficient way, and to provide better service for residents. The fo{lowing are the primary reasons why the City of Palm Beach Gardens should consider pursuing a proactive annexation approach: • Annexation can help reduce the 'large unincorporated population around the City that imposes negative impacts on City residents (safety, aesthetics, and property values). ■ Annexation can provide the City with additional sources of revenue. ■ Annexation can provide a supply of affordable homes and diversify existing land uses. Annexation can increase legislative influence in Palm Beach County by including population that it is not considered in the official census counts. In October 2016, City staff assessed potential areas for annexation. Staff evaluated the existing conditions of twenty-six (26) areas for future annexation in the City of Palm Beach Gardens. The study resulted with critical information for making decisions regarding future annexations for Palm Beach Gardens. This study was developed and coordinated by the Planning and Zoning Department with active collaboration and input from various City departments, Seacoast Utility Authority, and Palm Beach County. The Annexation Study includes an Introduction, the Methodologies used, a summary of the evaluation for each of the twenty-six (26) areas, and a conclusion of the results with policy guidance for the City Manager to implement for potential future annexations into the City. POLICY GUIDANCE FOR METHOD OF ANNEXATION In order to ensure that the proposed annexation areas are incorporated in an efficient and beneficial manner, the following policies for annexation are proposed. 1. Promote voluntary annexation whenever feasible, 2. Promote the use of annexations through interlocal agreement per F.S. 171.046. 3. Address involuntary requests for annexation through community coordination and interdepartmental coordinated review. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of Resolution 13, 2017 as presented. RESOLUTION 13, 2017 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA ACCEPTING THE "ANNEXATION AREAS OF INTEREST STUDY" FOR FUTURE ANNEXATION AREAS; DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO CONTINUE WITH THE "ANNEXATION AREAS OF INTEREST STUDY" AS POLICY GUIDANCE FOR THE ANNEXATION INITIATIVE, CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 171, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. WHEREAS, Chapter 171, Florida Statutes, provides rules and regulations for annexation; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to formally accept the "Annexation Areas of Interest Study" as policy guidance for future annexation initiatives, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems approval of this Resolution to be in the best interest of the health, safety, and welfare of the residents and citizens of the City of Palm Beach Gardens and the public at large. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA that: SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and ratified. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby accepts the "Annexation Areas of Interest Study" as policy guidance, as more particularly described and depicted in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein, and hereby directs the City Manager to implement said policy. SECTION 3. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank) Page 1 of 2 Resolution 13, 2017 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ATTEST:. IN Patricia Snider, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY M. R. Max Lohman, City Attorney VOTE: MAYOR TINSLEY VICE MAYOR JABLIN COUNCILMEMBER PREMUROSO COUNCILMEMBER MARINO COUNCILMEMBER WOODS 2017. CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA go Marcie Tinsley, Mayor AYE NAY ABSENT llpbgsnasWttorneylattorney_sharelRESOLUTIONS12417\Resolution 13 2017 accepting annexation study.docx a Page 2 of 2. Resolution 13, 2017 EXHIBIT "A" • ',ATION AREAS OF INTEREST STUDY Y OF PALM BEACH GARDENS _r t'ALM BEACH January 5, 2017 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Purpose of Annexation Annexation is part of the City's sustainable growth strategy. Annexation is a tool to increase the City's revenue, to compact its boundaries, to utilize tax dollars in the most efficient way, and to provide better service for residents. The following are the primary reasons why the City of Palm Beach Gardens should consider pursuing a proactive annexation approach: Annexation can help reduce the large unincorporated population around the City that imposes negative impacts on City residents (safety, aesthetics and property values) 0 Annexation can provide the City with additional sources of revenue Annexation can provide a supply of affordable homes and diversify existing land uses + Annexation can increase legislative influence in Palm Beach County by including population that it is not considered in the official census counts This comprehensive study will evaluate the costs and benefits of annexing 26 different areas adjoining the City of Palm Beach Gardens. This study will provide the City with critical information for making decisions regarding future annexations for Palm Beach Gardens. The study was developed and coordinated by the Planning and Zoning Department with active collaboration and input from various City departments, Seacoast Utility Authority, and Palm Beach County. Study Area The study area is based on the 1991 Future Potential Annexation Map, which is part of the City's Comprehensive Plan (Map A.4). In addition to the 23 areas depicted on Map AA, three (3) additional areas were analyzed in this study. The goal was to gather data and provide a cost - benefit analysis of adjoining unincorporated areas that may potentially be considered for the City's Future Annexation Map amendment. Appendix A, Future Annexation Map, presents all 26 potential annexation areas that will be analyzed in this comprehensive annexation study. Chapter 1 Organization of Study The study has been organized into four (4) chapters and an appendix. A brief description of each chapter is listed below. * Chapter I explains the purpose of the subject annexation areas of interest study. ■ Chapter 2 describes the methodology used by each City department in determining a comprehensive assessment and Level of Service (LOS) for each potential annexation area. • Chapter 3 presents an in-depth inventory of each potential annexation area. The inventory includes the following data and analysis: o Ivey planning data (population, zoning, land use, housing) o Ability/capacity to serve and maintain Level of Service (LOS) standards o Projected revenues to be received and projected costs to serve each area • Chapter 4 gives a summary of the findings from Chapter 3 and sets forth Policy Guidance for further evaluation. • The Appendix section includes informational maps reference throughout the study and support information provided by all the City Departments involved in this study. 1-2 CHAPTER 2 METHODOLOGY The Annexation Areas of Interest Study conducted a comprehensive analysis of each area identified as a potential annexation area. The following data was analyzed for each potential area: * The existing land use, future land use, and zoning of the area; * The population and number of dwelling units in the area; * A Level of Service (LOS) analysis of the existing public services and facilities is provided (These public services and facilities include: water and sewer; code enforcement; parks, open space and grounds; existing roadway conditions; and fire rescue and law enforcement.); * The expected revenues and expenditures from annexing each proposed area; and a The overall costs and benefits, strategic and/or geographic reasons for annexation. Data for each service provision was provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the City department or agency responsible for that service. 'Water and sewer information was provided by the Seacoast Utility Authority and the City's Engineering Department. The Engineering Department also provided information related to the existing roadway conditions within the proposed annexation areas. Existing code violations within proposed annexation areas were supplied by the Code Enforcement Division. Park and recreation impacts and estimates were provided by the Public Services and Emergency Management Department. The Fire fescue and Police Departments supplied response times, number of calls and number of crimes. Solid Waste estimates were based on fees provided by the Solid Waste Authority. Further details on data provided for all this service provision information follows. It is important to note that estimates provided are not final and actual costs. Water and Sewer The Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA) provided information on whether an area had water and/or sewer service. In areas without service, installation of water and sewer systems serviced by a public utility company was evaluated. In order for these areas to receive water and sewer services, the installation of a new water main and sewer collection system would have to be constructed. These services would have to be located within acquired easements and/or road rights -of -way, and require considerable effort to construct in existing developed communities. Connections to each home would have to be installed, and existing wells, septic tanks and drain fields would have to be abandoned. A water meter and connection fees would also have to be paid by the property owner at the time of connection. Due to the variables within each of these communities evaluated in this report, the typical cost of water and sewer services is difficult to Chapter 2 sewer line is installed within the right-of-way adjacent to a home, the City's current code does not require a homeowner to connect to it. Because water and sewer service is not a requirement of annexation, nor is being proposed by the City, it has not been included in the estimated annual costs tables. In a few areas, water and sewer is already provided on an interim or permanent basis by Palm Beach County, Riviera Beach, or West Palen _Beach. For areas that are undeveloped, the developer of the property will be required to provide all water and sewer services for each unit. For the water and sewer tables in Chapter 3, "In Place" means that water or sewer facilities were available throughout the area, and "Not In Place" means water and sewer facilities are not provided. 'Sometimes a portion of an annexation area had water or sewer services marked "In place" but other portions were lacking one or both services. The exact number of unserviced units was not known at the time of data collection. Code Enforcement Division Code Enforcement staff inspected each potential annexation area and developed a list of possible violations of the City Ordinances. The methodology used to determine the number of additional Code Officers needed to service any annexed areas is based on the number of dwelling units and the projected number of code violations in that area. The current number of dwelling units in the City was used as a baseline and means of comparison. Public Services and Emergency Management. Department Any parks or open spaces located within, or adjacent to, the potential annexation areas were noted, including Palm Beach County —owned parks, or designated natural areas. The City's current LOS for park area is five (5) acres of park land for every 1,000 residents. To determine the amount of park and open space required to meet the LOS, the Projected population of the annexation area was multiplied by the LOS. (Population of Annexation Area)* 5.0 = area of park and open space required. At the time of annexation, these figures will be added to the existing park land that the City operates to determine if the LOS can be met. To clarify some of the terms listed throughout the study, the following definitions have been provided: Grounds means areas adjacent to roadways, such as medians and shoulders. Past City practice has been to assign the maintenance responsibility of these areas to adjacent property owners, including HOA's and commercial developments. The City does not typically assume responsibility of these areas once annexed, therefore no cost is associated with the annexation of those areas. Public Services means a broad public works type services that business and residents receive from the City. The LOS for Public Services is calculated by estimating annual expenses to provide the following primary elements within each area: 11-2 Chapter 2 • Road/Sidewalks Maintenance, • Street Sweeping, • Mosquito Spraying, • Stormwater System Maintenance, and • Canal Maintenance. An assumption is made that ownership of all County -owned roads, sidewalks, and stormwater systems will be transferred to the City for maintenance; however, such infrastructure must be brought up to an acceptable level prior to acceptance. Each estimate provided only includes actual material or contractual costs that would be incurred, and does not include internal labor costs. Internal labor costs would not be impacted unless multiple areas are annexed; therefore, labor costs would need further evaluation upon such occurrence. Engineering Department The Engineering Department conducted visual surveys of each of the potential annexation areas to determine the condition of road surfaces, right -of --way width, drainage, curbing, grading, sidewalks, striping, street lighting, and road signage. The roadways were evaluated at a LOS that is similar to that of adjacent communities within the City's jurisdiction. These street elements were then assigned letter grades according to the conditions described in Table 2.2 below. Comments regarding any other aspects for consideration were also noted, such as the presence of speed Bumps, gated communities, or private roads. Jurisdictional transfers of road rights -of -way or changes in maintenance responsibility are not proposed for any annexation area in this report. Roadway resurfacing costs were also not included in the annual cost estimates because rights -of -way transfers to the City are not proposed in this annexation study. Table 2.2. Roadway Condition Ratimis Road ROW Street Road Drainage Curbing Grading Sidewalk Striping signage Surface Width Lighting Meets or Meets or Meets or Meets or Meets at Meets or Meets or Meets or Meets or Exceeds Exceeds Exceeds Exceeds Exceeds Exceeds Exceeds Exceeds Exceeds A city's level of City's level City's level city's level City's City's level cityIs City's level City's service of service of service of service level of of service level of of service level of service service service some Portions of Some roadside conveyance the road not Minor Minor Minor Mostly to Mostly to patching or system constructed repairs or spotted repairs or City's Mostly to City's 13 resurfacing need to be in ROW, but minor new regarding minor Level of City's level level of required reconstructe constructed curbing work construction service of service service d and re- within required required sodded easements Major Existing Existing Major replacemen Major Major striping lighting in Not to Major stormwater Some ROW t or major regarding replacement in place Place but is City's C resurfacing Pipe acquisition new adjacent to or major new but is not not to City's level of required installation required constructio the construction to city's level of service required n required roadway required level of service service Road needs to Drainage Road not constructed Roadside sidewalks do No striping No D be re-buiU not within a No curbing areas not not exist and/or No lighting signage provided ROW gradedmissing signagc 11-3 Chapter 2 Fire Rescue Fire Rescue LOS impacts were analyzed by identifying the response times, emergency call volume, capabilities and staffing of the closest responding fire station. Through the Inter -Local Agreements with Palm Beach County Fire Rescue, West Palm Beach, and North Palm Beach for Mutual Aid and Automatic Assistance the level of fire and emergency service to each of the subject parcel appears to meet the same standard as applied to the rest of the City. The data provided by Palm Beach County Fire Rescue Dispatch provides only an average response time to each area to be considered. Without extensive analysis of the current data provided it is difficult to determine the impact on the LOS. The Commission on Fire Accreditation International has benchmark standards and baseline standards. Each standard is broken up into suburban and rural. The specific response times required for each is shown below. The response times for each area are depicted in Chapter 3. At this time, the City is aiming to meet the response times of the Commission on Fire Accreditation International Baseline standards. Table 2.3 Fire Department Response Time Standards (First Due) ACCREDITATION STANDARDS BENCHMARK BASELINE SUB RURAL SUB RURAL 7:30min 12:30min 8:46 min Oman (1) (1) At this time, there are no existing calls in rural area to establish baseline data If the Inter -Local Agreements remain in place there is no additional cost to the City to provide service to the subject areas. Should the Inter -Local Agreements expire or be cancelled by any party, Fire Rescue may need to consider full staffing. Police Department Law enforcement needs were determined by the Police Department based on the population of the area, the number of service call incidents, and number of crimes over the past year. Levels of Service (LOS) were based on a combination of population and calls for service incidents. Population LOS is currently 2.25 officers per 1,000 residents. Calls for service incidents are based on not exceeding 1,000 calls per year, per patrol officer. Furthermore, similarly to the Fire Department's Automatic Aid Agreement with Palm Beach County, the City's Police Department is a member of the Palm Beach County Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Agreement which sets forth mutual aid provisions for all municipalities and the Sheriff. Solid Waste and Debris Removal from Hurricanes Solid waste expenditures were based on fees set by the City's ordinance for Single -Family or Multi -Family residential units multiplied by the number of units in the proposed annexation areas (Single -Family or Multi -Family fee * Number of d.u.). Revenues were calculated using the City's ordinance for franchise fee(s) per dwelling unit. Solid waste expenditures associated with nonresidential were not included in the calculation. Debris removal was calculated using the U.S. Army Corp of Engineer's (USAGE) Hurricane Debris Estimating Model. The modeling methodology was developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Emergency Management 11-4 Chapter 2 staff using actual data from Hurricanes Frederick„ Hugo, and Andrew. The estimates produced by the model are predicated to have an accuracy of +/- 30 percent (accuracy is limited due to the many variables inherit to the debris removal process). The primary factor the model utilizes to estimate storm generated debris is the total number of households in a developed urban/suburban area. Other factors utilized are cubic yards of debris generated per household per storm category, vegetative cover, commercial density, and precipitation. The household debris includes debris generated from damage to the house including contents and surrounding shrubs/trees. Solid waste expenditures were included within each area's estimated annual costs of services table. Iowever, storm debris removal is not a regular expense, and was not calculated into annual cost estimates. Expenditures and Revenue Analysis The expected annual expenses to the City for providing services to the proposed annexed areas, as detailed above and an estimation of the expected annual revenue were calculated for each proposed annexation area. The estimated annual revenues were based on the taxable value and ad valorem taxes from the Palm Beach County Property Appraisers Office for all properties within each annexation area. Franchise fees for Waste Management and Florida Power & Light, City telecommunications service tax, and City business tax fees, were added to the ad valorem takes to arrive at the total estimated annual revenue for each annexation area. A cost -benefit analysis was conducted based on the annual expense of service provision compared to the projected revenue generated by annexation of each area. This analysis concludes with the estimated net revenue of annexation of the area. Expected net revenue was indicated as either positive or negative, and was factored into the determination of the annexation phases. II-5 CHAPTER 3 ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL ANNEXATION AREAS This chapter focuses on the evaluation of 26 potential annexation areas in terms of population, land use, zoning, revenues, expenditure, and corresponding Level of Service (LOS) standards. The resulting analysis presents the estimated annual cost of extending City services to each potential annexation area and the annual revenues that can be expected. GENERAL DESCRIPTION This unincorporated area is approximately 283 acres, and is adjacent to the City's boundaries on three (3) sides. Area 1 is bounded by Prosperity Farms Road (to the east), Alternate Al (to the west), Atlantic Road (to the south), and the Palm Beach Cabana Colony Canal (to the north). Area 1 includes Cabana Colony, Country Village, Garden Way Condos, Maheau Estates, a commercial strip along Alternate AIA, Cross Community Church and Eisenhower Elementary School. The area is comprised of 979 dwelling units, with an estimated population of 2,070. Area 1 is generally bounded by the City of Palm Beach Gardens on three sides and unincorporated Palm Beach County to the east across Prosperity Farms Road. Chapter 3: LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 1. The current land use is primarily single-family residential with a strip of general commercial and Eisenhower Elementary Public School along AIA, the western portion of the subject site. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively.. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's land use and zoning designations of Area 1 for compatibility and consistency with the City's land use and zoning criteria. AREA I Table 1. Land Llse ant] Zoning Existing Future Land Area Land use Zoning Use Alternate A -I -A Commercial Commercial High with an RH (Residential Country Village/ Gardens and underlying MR-5 (CH/5) and High Density) and Way Condo/ Cabana Multi -family Medium Density Residential, CG (General Colony Commercial 5 Units / Acre (MR-5) Commercial) Cabana Colony Single Family Medium Density Residential, RM (Residential Homes 5 Units / Acre (MR-5) Medium Density) Eisenhower Elementary Public Institutional (IIST) RS (Residential School School Single Family) aheu Subsection C Single- Family Low Density Residential, 3 RS (Residential Homes Units /Acre (LR-3) Single Family) Cross Community Church/ Low Density Residential, 3 RT (Residential Church Religious Units I Acre (LR-3) Transition) POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population and number of dwelling units at build -out are provided in Table 2. According to the table, Area 1 has a population of 2,070. This capacity analysis indicates that there are existing facilities on site and a range of services are currently provided by Palm Beach County. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research, 2016. Chapter 3: EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 1 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Table 3 provides data on the availability of water and sewer facilities within Area 1. According to the table, water and sewer lines are fully established in the area and are provided by Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA). Ali FA I Area Water Sewer Alternate Al (east) Country Village/ Gardens Way Condos In Place In Place Cabana Colony In Place In Place Eisenhower Elementary School In Place In Place Maheu Subsection C In Place In Place Cross Community Church In Place In Place CODE ENFORCEMENT The City's Cade Enforcement Division assessed the impacts of annexing Area 1, and noted common code compliance issues and violations presented in Table 4. (Remainder of page left intentionally blank) Chapter 3: Table 4. Code Enforcement Area Issues, Violations, and Comments Alternate AIA (east) Commercial area: Signage, parking, dumpsters Country Village/ Gardens Way Residential area: Property Maintenance Standards, Condos parking Residential: Property Maintenance Standards, Cabana Colony RV/Boat/Commercial vehicle in front properties and ROW, outdoor storage Eisenhower Elementary School New school facility Maheu Subsection C Residential: Minimal code enforcement and could be improved with little effort Cross Community Church No code violations noted PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE With regard to parks and open space, Area 1 has one (1) park (Cabana Colony Park) located in the northwest corner of the Cabana Colony neighborhood. The park is 1.46 acres in size, and includes playground equipment, a basketball court, picnic areas, and a walking path. Cabana Colony Park is currently owned and maintained by Palm Beach County. EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS Table 6 shows the condition of road surfaces, right-of-way width, drainage, curbing, grading, sidewalks, striping, street lighting, and road signage, which were analyzed by Staff and assigned letter grades as described in Table 2.2 in Chapter 2. Table 6 indicates that all the road surfaces within Area 1 will require some patching or resurfacing and sidewalks exist on both sides of roads. With regard to drainage and grading, there are two (2) streets that do not meet the City's current LOS, Oak Drive and West Edgewater Drive. Drainage canals that border Cabana Colony to the west and north are in need of dredging and bank stabilization. Also, speed bumps are not permitted within the City's jurisdiction and would have to come into conformance with the City Code. The City, per Section 62-53 of the Code of Ordinances, cannot assume maintenance responsibility of any public roadway rights -of -way that do not meet the City's roadway standards. Because the roads in this area do not meet current City standards, they would have to be repaired by the current owner or could be improved using the City's Neighborhood Inn, Chapter3: Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant, or any alternate means of financing. Road Name x.p , M Q7 c � 'A ,©,yy W `Q U U a+°e 0 zz wo '� a a W� Comments Acapulco Avenue B B A D B B D C B Speed bumps Atlantic Road B B A D B B C C A Speed bunjps, sidewalk on one side: Bahama Road B B A D B B C C B Bermuda Road B B A D B B C C B Bimini Road B B A D B B C D B Capri Road B B A D B B C D B Catalina Road B B A D B B D D B Colony Avenue B B A D B B C D B Dinghy Road B B A D B B C D B Dolphin Drive B B A D B B C D B Dunes Road B B A D B C C D B Easterly Avenue A A A D A B A D A Easterly Avenue N B B C D A B D D B Single Lane Road W. Edgewater Dr. B C B D C D C D B Speed humps Everglades road B B A D B B D D B Florida Boulevard B B A D B B A C A Speed bumps Grave Court B B A D B B D C B Grave Road B B A D B B D C B Cracking in places Gull Road B B A D B B D C B Hillman Drive B B A D B B D C B Hillman Circle B B A D B B D C B Island Road A B A D B B D C B Lone Pine Drive - - - - - - - - - Private Gated Lane Pine Lane - - - - - - - - - Private Gated Lone Pine Road B B A B B B A C A Oak Drive B C A D C D D D B Holiday B B A D B B D C A Note: (1) Refer to Table 2.2 III-5 Chapter 3:. d W I ; Do III il�l►:'[�■�T5C17Z�lal► Table 7 illustrates the current fire rescue and law enforcement service to Area 1. The area is covered by Palm Beach Gardens' first responder Station 5. The current average response time for this area is approximately 6:10 minutes. Table 7 also illustrates that the Palm Beach Sheriff's office received 1,654 calls for police service during 2015. There were also 333 documented crimes in this area during that same time period. The additional staff necessary to service this area is discussed in Chapter 5. Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 1. The total estimated annual revenue for Area 1 is $650,233. Notes: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and GlS Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $S 1.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6% franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City Services and Solid Waste services to Area 1. The total estimated gross expenditure is $151,603. Also, the City estimates that $630,596.99 would be needed for debris removal expense in the event a Category 3 Hurricane. M Chapter 3: Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, the City should consider the economic impact of debris removal in its analysis of annexing an area. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and annual expenditure of extending City services to Area 1. The table illustrates that the City would potentially gain approximately $498,630 in net annual revenue upon annexation into the City. (The remainder of the page left intentionally blank) Chapter 3: GENERAL DESCRIPTION This unincorporated area is 602 acres and is bounded on three (3) sides by the City of Palm Beach Gardens and the Intra-Coastal Waterway on the East. Area 2 includes Frenchman's Landing, Crystal Pointe, Mariner's Cove, Wood Hill Estates, Frenchman's Cove, Maheu Subdivision, Prosperity Bay Village, Palm Harbor, Windsor Estates, Hope Acres, Old {Gate and other unrecorded residential subdivisions. It also includes the Idlewood Road marina and boat storage area at the southernmost end. A majority of Area 2 is comprised of single family homes, many of which have water and dock access. Also, the greater part of the communities in the northern portion of the area have private access drives, or fully gated communities. Area 2 is located between the City of Palm Beach Gardens on the west and the Intra-Coastal Waterway on the east. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 presents the land use and zoning of Area 2. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's land use and zoning of Area 2 for compatibility and consistency with the City's land use and zoning criteria. The existing land use is primarily residential, with a small portion of Industrial at the southern end. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. M Chapter 3: AREA 2 Table 1. Land tise anti Area Zoning Existing Land Future Land Zonis g Use Use Industrial (114D), Low Density Maheu Subdivision, Residential; boat Residential 2 Units/Acre (LR- IL (industrial Light), Prosperity Bay Village, storage and 2), Medium Density Residential, and RS (Residential unrecorded, Idlewood marina 5 Units/Acre (MR-5), and Low Single Family) Road marina area Density Residential, 3 Units/Acre (LR-3) Maheu Estates, Maheu Low Density Residential, 2 Subdivision, Residential Units/Acre (LR-2), and Low RS (Residential Single unrecorded. Density Residential, 3 Family) Units/Acre (LR-3) Frenchman's Landing Residential Medium. Density Residential, 5 RS (Residential Single Units/Acre (MR-5) Family) Crystal Pointe? Residential Medium Density Residential, 5 RS (Residential Single Units/Acre (MR-5) Family) Palm Harbor, Windsor Low Density Residential, 2 Estates, Frenchman's Units/Acre (1,11-2), Medium Cove, Mariner's Cove, Residential Density Residential, 5 RS (Residential Single Wood Hill Estates, Units/Acre (MR-5), and Low Family) Hope Acres, Old Gate, Density Residential, 3 unrecorded Units/Acre (LR-3) POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population and number of dwelling units at build -out are provided in Table 2. Per the table, Area 2 has a 2015.population of 2,719 and 1,286 dwelling units. This capacity analysis indicates that there are existing facilities on site and a range of services are currently being provided by the County. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research estimates, 2016. we Chapter 3: EXISTING CONDITIONS SAND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) An analysis was conducted for Area 2 using data provided to the Planning and ,Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will need to be determined at the time of annexation. Table 3 illustrates that Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA) water service is currently available throughout all of Area 2, and SUA sewer service is available in all but two (2) neighborhoods, as indicated in the table below. Since water and sewer improvements are not considered in this annexation study, these costs are not considered in the annual expenses table. AREA 2 Table 3. Water and Sewer Area Water Sewer Comments Maheu Subdivision, Prosperity In place In place N/A Bay Village, unrecorded Maheu Estates, Maheu In lace P Not in NIA Subdivision, unrecorded place Frenchman's Landing In place In place NIA Crystal Point In place In place NIA Palm Harbor, Windsor Estates, In place/ Sewer is in place; except for Frenchman's Cove, Mariner's the Windsor Estates and the Cove, Wood Hill Estates, Hope In place Not in Hope Lane West portion of Acres, Old Gate, unrecorded place Hope Acres. CODE ENFORCEMENT" Table 4 reflects the findings the City's code enforcement assessment of Area 2. Area 2 contains moderate code violations. The most common violation found was the parking of boat and trailers within the front yard or without proper screening from the right-of-way. The southernmost section of Area 2, including the Mahue subdivision and Prosperity Bay communities, have a variety of violations as noted in Table 4. 111-10 Chapter 3: AREA 2 Table 4. Code Enforcement Area Issues, Violations, and Comments Mahue subdivision would require moderate code Maheu Subdivision, Prosperity Bay enforcement. Common violations include; Property Village, unrecorded Maintenance Standards, boat and trailers not properly screened, and outdoor storage. Maheu Estates Minimal code enforcement issues Frenchman's Landing Minimal code enforcement issues Crystal Paint Minimal code enforcement issues Palm Harbor, Windsor Estates, Mariner's Cove and Wood Hill Estates are neat and Frenchman's Cove, Mariner's Cove, clean gated communities. Minimal code Wood Hill Estates, Hope Acres, Old enforcement issues Gate, unrecorded PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. Table 6 shows the condition of road surfaces, right-of-way width, drainage, curbing, grading, sidewalks, striping, street lighting, and road signage, which were analyzed by Staff and assigned letter grades as described in Table 2.2 in Chapter 2. Table 6 indicates that all the road surfaces within Area 2 will require some patching or resurfacing and sidewalks exist on both sides of roads. With regard to drainage and grading, there are several streets that do not meet the City's current LOS and will require improvements. Also, speed bumps are not permitted within the City's jurisdiction and would have to come into conformance with the City Code. The City, per Section 62-53 of the Code of Ordinances, cannot assume maintenance responsibility of any public roadway rights -of -way that do not meet the City's roadway standards. Because the roads in this area do not meet current City standards, they would have to be repaired by the current owner or could be improved using the City's Neighborhood Chapter 3 Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant, or any other alternative means of financing. AREA Tableoa on eb c a ap Road Name &n z Comments Ca U 125'h Street B D C D D D D D D 23rd D D C D D D D D D Private Road Azure Circle B A B D B D B D B Bay Circle B A B D B D A D B Bay Village - - - - - - - - - Gated Bay Village Harbour - - - - - - - - - Gated Cardinal C C B D C - - D - Carib Circle C A B D B A A A B Casa de Marbetla - - - - - - - - - Gated Coastal Circle C A A A A A D D B Frenchman's Cove Coconut Row C C A D C D D D B Country Oaks B A A D B D D D A Seed humps Crystal Pointe - I - - - - - - - - Gated Dock Way D D C D D D D D D Drake B C A D C D D A B Sn Harbor Estates Driftwood Circle C A B D B B A A B Edgewater East B B B D B A D A A Edgewater Drive B A C D B A D A A Edgewater Drive B A B D B D D D B North Edward B B B D B D D D B Flamingo Road B C B D C D C D B Flamingo Terrace B B A B D D D D B Curbing on one side Frenchman's - - - - - - -' - Gated Landis . Harbor Lane C C C D C D D D B Hol!y B A B D B D D D B Hope Lane B A B D D A B D A Sidewalk and curbon one side Idlewilde B A B D B B B D A Inland Cove C C A D C D D D A Insure Drive C B B D C D D D D Laurel Lane B D C D D D D D B Seed bumps I1I-12 Chapter 3: Road Name r!� 1q 3 ow ra z Comments U U r+ Mariner's Cove - - - - - - - - - Gated N. Shore D C C D C D D C A B in certain places North Wallen Road B B A D B D D D B Niki "o B D B D C D D D A Private Road North Shore (Off D D - - - - - - - Flamingo) Old Gate Lane - - - - - - - - - Gated Old Prosperity B B B D B D D D B Farms Palm Harbor B A A A A A D D C Prosperity Bay - _ _ _ _ - _ Gated Village South Shore Drive C C C D B D D D C South Wallen Road B B A D B D D D B Seven Oaks A A A A A D D D B Gated Snook Trail - - - - - - - - - Gated Snug Harbor B - - D - D - D - Venice Drive B A A D B D D D C Wilsee B C C D C D D D D Private. Road Windsor B B A D B B D D _B Note: ( 1) Refer to Table 2.2 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 7 illustrates the current fire rescue and law enforcement service to Area 2. This area is covered by two (2) Palm Beach Gardens first responder stations, Stations 5 and 2. The response time for this area is 7:19 minutes. Table 7 also illustrates that the Palm Beach Sheriff's office received 956 calls for police service over a one (1) year period. There were 251 documented crimes in this area over a one (1) year period. Additional staff needs necessary to provide service to Area 2 is discussed in Chapter 5. 111-13 Chapter 3: Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01 /01 /2015 and 12/31 /2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 presents the estimated annual revenue by category. The table shows that Area 2 has the potential to generate an estimated total of $3,088,694, a significant amount of revenue for the City. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and GIS Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6% franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual cast of extending Public Services and Solid Waste services to Area 2. From the table below, a total of $174,209 may be spent annually by the City to maintain the grounds and solid waste service for Area 2. The City estimates that $637,158.39 would be needed for debris removal expense in the event of a direct hit from a Category 3 Hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, the City should consider the economic impact of the additional responsibility of debris removal after annexing the area. 111-14 Chapter 3: Note. (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Table 10 summarizes the annual cost and revenue of extending City services to Area 2.1 he table shows that the City could potentially gain approximately $2.9 million in annual revenue upon annexation. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank) 11516i Chapter 3: AREA 3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION This existing enclave is in unincorporated area and consists of 39 acres. It is bounded to the west by Legacy Place, to the south by The Oaks residential community, to the east by Palm Beach State College campus, and to the north by the Government Center area. This area comprises of the community known as Monet Gardens. Monet Gardens has 74 single family residential units, which house 156 people. Area 3 is an enclave surrounded by the City of Palm Beach Gardens. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 below presents the land use and zoning of Area 3. The Area is an existing residential subdivision of single-family homes. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's land use and zoning of Area 3 for compatibility and consistency with the City's land use and zoning criteria. Ha Chapter 3: POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population and number of dwelling units at build -out are provided in Table 2. Area 3 is at build -out capacity with no opportunity for future expansion or growth. This capacity analysis indicates that there are existing facilities on site and a range of services are currently provided by the County. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research estimates, 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 3 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Table 3 illustrates that Water and Sewer services are not currently serviced by Seacoast Utility Authority (SETA) for the Monet Gardens community. Since water and sewer improvements are not considered in this annexation study, these costs are not considered in the annual expenses table. If these improvements are to be considered in the fixture, they could be financed as part of the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program or the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. III-17 Chapter 3; 1031102010 0113_.193_01MAM The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts of annexing Area 3, and noted common code compliance issues and violations presented in Table 4. Some common violations that were noted in Area l include the storage of boats and recreational vehicles. The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. I WOK 111-1 rTr ►1.11YIE[r�l Table G shows the condition of road surfaces, right-of-way width, drainage, curbing, grading, sidewalks, striping, street lighting, and road signage, which were analyzed by Staff and assigned letter grades as described in Table 2.2 in Chapter 2. Area 3 consists of three (3) long dead-end roadways with no cul-de-sacs, each accessed from RCA Boulevard on the south with no access to Fairchild Avenue to the north. The road surfaces that belong to Area 3 meet or exceed the City's LOS, with the exception of Monet Woods Road. Based on the existence of some flood washing, shallow swales and no drainage control, the drainage and grading conditions of all of the roads in this area would need some improvement. The City does not anticipate any jurisdictional transfer of road rights -of -way or maintenance responsibility under this annexation, therefore, roadway improvements cost is not considered in the annual expenses table. The City, per Section 62-53 of the Code of Ordinances, cannot assume maintenance responsibility of any public roadway rights -of -way that do not meet the City's roadway standards. Because the roads in this area do not meet current City standards they would have to be repaired by the current owner or could be improved using the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program or the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. 111-18 Chapter 3 AREA 3 Table 6. Existing Road Conditions Road Nance r ° - XLIZ Comments o Ca U U un o a � � Monet Ridge A C B D C D D D B Dead end Monet Terrace B C B D C D D D B Speed bumps, Dead end Monet Woods C C B D C D D D B Dead end Road Note: (1) Refer to Table 2,2 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 7 illustrates the current fire rescue and law enforcement service to Area 3. The area is covered by Palm Beach Gardens' first responder Station No. 2. The current average response time is 4:55 minutes. Table 7 also illustrates that the Palm Beach Sheriff's office received 43 calls for police service over a one (1) year period. There were 20 documented crimes in this area over a one (1) year period. The additional staff necessary to service this area is discussed in Chapter 5. AREA 3 Table 7. Fire Rescue and Law Enforcement Fire Rescue Law Enforcement (1) First Responder Station P Avg. Response Time No. of Calls per No. of Crimes per (1) Year Year PBG Station No. 2 4:55 min. (29 calls) 43 20 Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) II1-19 Chapter 3: EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 3. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and G1S Divisions. (3) Telecommunication services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6°/u franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City grounds maintenance and solid waste services to Area 3. This table does not include the one-time expense to supply water and sewer service to this area, as explained in Table 3. Also, the City estimates that $30,932.29 would be needed for debris removal expense in the event of a direct hit from a Category 3 Hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, the City should consider the economic impact of the additional responsibility of debris removal after annexing the area. Public Services ! Solid 'Waste I Total $650 $7,770 1 $8,420 Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and estimated annual cost of extending City services to Area 3. The City is expected to show a net revenue increase of approximately $71,189 upon annexing this area. 11 W61 Chapter 3: AREA 4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area 4 is a 32-acre enclave at the City's eastern boundary. The area lies at the northwest comer of RCA Boulevard and Prosperity Farms Road and is surrounded by the City three (3) sides. This area is comprised of Monet Acres, a retirement community mobile home park, and Monet Heights, a small single family community, the Knights of Columbus and 112a' Court North. Monet Acres consists of nearly 90 individually owned mobile home lots. Monet Heights consists of 20 homes, 16 of which are one (1) acre lots, with the remaining four (4) located on subdivided 0.5 acre parcels. Area 4 is an enclave located at the northeast corner of Prosperity Farms Road and RCA Boulevard. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 below presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 4. Existing uses include a mobile hoarse park to the eastern portion (Monet Acres), and a large lot single-family residential community to the western portion (Monet Heights) of the subject site. Area 4 is an existing enclave on the City's eastern boundary. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's land use and zoning of Area 4 for compatibility and consistency with the City's land use and zoning criteria. III-21 Chapter 3: TableAREA 4 Area Existing Land Use Future Land Use ,Zoning Acres Mobile Home Park High Residential, 12 RH (ResidentialMonet Units/Acre (HR-12) Hi Monet Heights Single Family Low Residential, 1 Unit/Acre RS (residential Housing (LR-1) Single Family) Monet Heights Charitable Lodge and High Residential 12 RS (Residential and Knights of Single Family Units/Acre (HR-12) Single family) Columbus Housing POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population and number of dwelling units at build -out are provided in Table 2. Area 4 has a current population of 235 residents and 111 dwelling units. This primarily built -out enclave has existing facilities on site with a number of services currently provided for by the County. Source: Source: 2010 Census Data EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 4 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Monet Heights and 1121 Court North currently have no water or sewer service provided while Monet Acres has a master water meter but no sewer. Since water and sewer improvements are not considered in this annexation study, these costs are not considered in the annual expenses table. If these improvements are to be considered in the future, they could be financed as part of the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. III-22 Chapter 3: CODE ENFORCEMENT The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts of annexing Area 4 and noted common violations presented in Table 4. PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. Table 6 shows the condition of road surfaces, right-of-way width, drainage, curbing, grading, sidewalks, striping, street lighting, and road signage, which were analyzed by Staff and assigned letter grades as described in Table 2.2 in Chapter 2. The road surfaces within Area 4 meet or exceed the City's current level of service. since the City does not anticipate any jurisdictional transfer of road rights -of -way or maintenance responsibility under this annexation, therefore, roadway improvements cost is not considered in the annual expenses table below. 11241 Chapter 3: The City, per Section 62-53 of the Code of Ordinances, cannot assume maintenance responsibility of any public roadway rights -of -way that do not meet the City's roadway standards. Because the roads in this area do not meet current city standards, they would have to be repaired by the current owner or could be improved using the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Bloch Grant or any other alternative means of financing. AREA 4 Tableo.Conditions Qj .0 ca Road :"dame � va Comments o U U e a � � East Monet Circle A C A D B D D A A East Lane A C A D B D D A A Monet Circle A C A D B D D A A Monet Lane A C A D C D D D C West Lane A C A D B D D A A 112" Court North B C C D D D D D B Note: (1) Refer to Table 2.2 FIRE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Impacts to the City's Fire Rescue and Law Enforcement service due to annexation of this area would be minimal. As Table 7 illustrates, the City's Fire Station No. 2 has been assigned the first responder station for all of Area 4. The Fire Department responded to 7 calls last year, with an average response time of 6:16 minutes. Although the Police Department does not have a similar first responder status to this area, the Sheriff s office received a minimal number of calls, 11, and a small number of crimes, 4, were recorded over the period of one (1) year. Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics 111-24 Chapter 3: EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 4. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and GIS Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6% franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual costs of extending City services and solid waste services to Area 4. The City estimates that $55,068.86 would be needed for debris removal expense in the event of a direct hit from a Category 3 Hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, the City should consider the economic impact of the additional responsibility of debris removal after annexing the area. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and estimated annual cost of extending City services to Area 4. The City is expected to show a net gain of approximately $54,643 in annual revenue upon annexing this area. This estimate does not include the costs associated with extending water or sewer service to this area. 111-25 Chapter 3: GENERAL DESCRIPTION This unincorporated area is 31 acres, and situated just south of PGA Boulevard, north of Canal Road, west of the Intracoastal Waterway, and east of Prosperity Farms Road. It includes the Pirates Cove residential community, a few other residential lots along Canal Road and Palm Tree Lane, and one (1) parcel fronting on Prosperity Farms Road. Most of this area is located along a canal basin with water access to the Intracoastal Waterway and vehicular access to PGA Boulevard and Prosperity Farms Road. The parcel located on the east side of the Prosperity Farms Road, just north of the intersection of Prosperity Farms Road and RCA Boulevard, is an existing daycare business, which is adjacent on the south to a commercial property within the City. Area S is surrounded by the City of Palm Beach Gardens on three (3) sides and the Intra-coastal waterway to the east. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 5. This area lies at the eastern boundary of the City's limits. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's land use and zoning designations of Area 5 for compatibility and consistency with the City's land use and zoning criteria. III-26 Chapter 3: Table 1. Land Lise Zoning and Area Existing Land Use Future Land Use Zoning Pirates Cove, Canal Road, and Palm Tree Single Family Low Residential, 3 RS (Residential Lane residential Residential Units/Acre (LR-3) Single Family) communities Daycare on Prosperity Daycare Low Residential, 3 RS (Residential Farms Rd. Units/Acre LR-3 Single Family) 11� 1ij11 l��7rr'f►1 i7►li u' i 1XI] 1112JUM l IJ0 ll_0 The estimated population and number of dwelling is provided in Table 2. Area 5 has a current population of 144 and a total of 68 dwelling units. This residential capacity analysis indicates that there are existing facilities on site with a range of services being provided to the existing residential and commercial uses. Estimated Population (2015) 144 Source: 2015 U Size (acres) 31.12 Bureau of Economic and Business Existing Number of Dwelling Units (2015) 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) m A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 5 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Table 3 illustrates that SUA water service is already available throughout all of Area 5. Pirates Cove has SUA water and sewer. All residents have SUA Water and Sewer on Canal Road, but the last five (5) houses on the road have not connected to the sewer lines. Since water and sewer improvements are not considered in this annexation study, these costs are not considered in the annual expenses table. If these improvements are to be considered in the future, they could be financed as part of the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. 111-27 Chapter 3: CODE ENFORCEMENT The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts of annexing Area 5, and noted common code compliance issues and violations presented in Table 4. 171:7:4.`S P IVA Wi] 01M 111-14 �] The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS Table 5 shows the condition of road surfaces, right-of-way width, drainage, curbing, grading, sidewalks, striping, street lighting, and road signage, which were analyzed by Staff and assigned letter grades as described in Table 2.2 in Chapter 2. The road surface and drainage for most of the roadways in. Area 5 are in fair condition and will need repair meet the City's current level of service. Since the City does not anticipate any jurisdictional transfer of road rights -of -way or maintenance responsibility under this annexation, therefore, roadway improvements cost is not considered in the annual expenses table. The City, per Section 62-53 of the Code of Ordinances, cannot assume maintenance responsibility of any public roadway rights -of -way that do not meet the City's roadway standards. Because the roads in this area do not meet current city standards, they would have to be repaired by the current III-28 Chapter 3: owner or could be improved using the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. CU an Road Name v) Comments A G a Avery Road B B A D D D D A A 80-foot cul-de-sac Dead End Road Sign is Canal Road C D C D D D D B A hidden by tree branches E. Teach B B B D D D D D A 80-foot cul-de-sac Road Kidd Lane A B A D D D D D A Teach Road C B A D D D D D A. Note: (1) Refer to Table 2.2 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT As Table 7 illustrates, the City's Fire Station No. 2 has been assigned the first responder station for this area. The average response time for Area 5 is 5:44 minutes. The Police Department reported 54 calls and 21 crimes per year in this area. Nate: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2015 (2) 2015 Calls for 'Service and Crime Statistics III-2.9 Chapter 3: EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 5. The total estimated annual revenue for Area 5 is $161,194. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and GIS Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($I05 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6% franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City Services and Solid Waste services to Area 5. The City estimates that $33,744.32 would be needed for debris removal expense in the event of a direct hit from a Category 3 Hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, the City should consider the economic impact of the additional responsibility of debris removal after annexing the area. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and estimated annual cost of extending City services to Area 5. The table shows that the City would potentially gain approximately $151,539 in annual revenue upon annexation into the City. III-30 Chapter 3 I1.7ILIA GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area 6 is 848 acres, and is bounded by the Atlantic Ocean to the east, Little Lake Worth to the west, Juno Beach to the North and MacArthur State Park (North Palm Beach) to the South. The area includes the gated communities of Lost Tree Village, Portage Landing, Seminole Landing, Lost Tree Club, Hidden Key, and Captain's Key. It also includes a commercial plaza to the north of Golden Bear Plaza. The area is comprised of 769 dwelling units, which house a population of 1,626 people. This unincorporated area is generally bounded by Macarthur Beach State Paris to the south, Juno Beach to the north, US Highway i to the west, and the Atlantic Ocean to the east. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 below presents the land use and zoning of Area 6. Existing land uses in the Area include: large lot single-family residential north, east and southern portions of the subject site, with a golf course abutting the Lost Tree and Portage Landing residential communities, and a retail strip along US-1. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. 111-31 Chapter 3: At the time of annexation, the City should assess the County's land use and zoning of Area 6 for compatibility and consistency with the City's land use and zoning criteria. AREA f Table 1. Land Use and Zoning Area Existing Land Use Future Land Use Toning Last Tree and Single Family Low Residential, 2 RS (Residential Single Portage Landing Residential and Golf Units/Acre (LR-2) Family) and R}1 Course (Residential Hi ) Low Residential, 1 RS (Residential Single Single Family Units/Acre (LR-1) Family) and RTS Seminole Landing Residential and Low (Residential Transitional Residential, 3 Suburban) Units/Acre LR-3 Commercial along General Commercial High CG (Conmrcial USI Commercial/Retail CH18 General Lost Tree Condominium Low Residential, 1 RH (Residential High) Condominiums Community Units/Acre (LR-1) POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population is provided in Table 2. Area 6 has a current population of 1,626 and 769 dwelling units. This residential capacity analysis indicates that there are existing facilities on site and a range of services are provided for by the County. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research, 2016. I EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) I A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 6 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER SUA is currently not serving 150 units within Old Port Village and Lost Tree with the sanitary sewer. Potable water is currently available to all communities within the area. Currently, water 111-32" Chapter 3: and sewer improvements are not considered in this annexation study, these costs are not considered in the annual expenses table. If these improvements are to be considered in the future, they could be financed as part of the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. Table 3. Water and Seiier Area Water Sewer Old Pork Village and Lost Tree In place Approximately 50% has Sewer service Seminole Landing, Captains Key, In place Not in place except for Hidden Key Ridden Key Condos Intracoastal Park Unrecorded In place Not in place Portage Landing In place North has dry line sewer; South has some lots with low pressure sewer CODE ENFORCEMENT The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts of annexing Area b, and noted minor code compliance issues and violations presented in Table 4. PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies.. III-33 Chapter 3: EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS Table 6 indicates where the existing roadways within Area 6 meet or do not meet the City's current roadway level of service. The existing roadways are gated and the responsibility of the community and were not evaluated. Since the City does not anticipate any jurisdictional transfer of road rights - of -way or maintenance responsibility under this annexation, therefore, roadway improvements cost is not considered in the annual expenses table. The City, per Section 62-53 of the Cade of Ordinances, cannot assume maintenance responsibility of any public roadway rights -of -way that do not meet the City's roadway standards. Because the roads in this area do not meet current City standards, they would have to be repaired by the current owner or could be improved using the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. Table 6. Rom] Vx1simig Conditions ago l a 0 U Road Name ci ., ., .q .a ;� -Cn Comments AG r j rigcow 6 us Lost Tree Village - - - - - - - - - GATED Old Port Village - - - - - - - - - GATED Portage Landing - - - - - - - - - GATED Lost Tree Club - - - - - - - - - GATED Hidden Key - - - - - - - - - GATED Captain's Key - - - - - - - - - GATED Seminole LandinL - - - - - - - - - GATED Note: (1) Refer to Table 2.2 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT `fable 7 indicates that Area 6 is covered by Palm Beach County Station No. 15. The average response times for this area are 8:05 minutes. Fire Rescue has concerns about servicing areas affected by the drawbridge that is over the Intra-coastal. Information regarding emergency calls and crimes committed received from the Palm Beach County Sheriffs office is listed in Table 7. 111-34 Chapter 3: Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01 /01 /20I5 and 12/31 /2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 6. The total estimated annual revenue is $10,326,543. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and GIS Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6% franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City 'Services and Solid Waste services to the proposed annexation areas. The City estimates that $439,649.56 would be needed for debris removal expense in the event of a direct tut from a Category 3 Hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from IiEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, the City should consider the economic impact of the additional responsibility of debris removal after annexing the area. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. III-35 Chapter 3: Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and estimated annual cost of extending City services to Area 6. The table shows that the City would potentially gain approximately $10.2 million in annual revenue upon annexation into the City. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) HIM Chapter 3: ITIJ GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area 7 is 1,175 acres, and is bounded by Donald Ross Road to the north, Alton (fka the Briger Property to the east, Hood Road and Mirasol to the south, and the Loxahatchee Slough to the west. This area includes the Eastpointe, Marsh Pointe, and Old Marsh communities, which comprise of 1,083 dwelling units, and houses 2,290 people. Area 7 is located on the northern boundary with the City of Palm Beach Gardens on two (2) sides, the Town of Jupiter to the north and the Loxahatchee Slough to the west. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 below presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 7. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively.. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's land use and zoning designations of Area 7 for compatibility and consistency with the City's land use and zoning criteria. 111-37 Chapter 3: 7 TableAREA Area Existing Land Use Future Land Use Zoning Single Family Low Residential I [old Marsh Residential and Golf Unit/Acre (LR-1) RE (Residential Estate) Course Community Single Family Low Residential, 2 RE (Residential Estate) Eastpointe Residential and Golf Unit/Acre (LR-2) RS (Residential Single Course Community and Transportation Family) and Utilities T) RT (Residential Transitional) Marsh Pointe Single Family Low Residential, 3 RTS (Residential Residential Units/Acre (LR-3) Transitional Suburban) POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population is provided in Table 2. Area 7 currently has a population of 2,290 and 1,083 dwelling units. This residential capacity analysis indicates that there are existing facilities on site and a range of services being provided by the County to these residential communities. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business research, 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A Level of Service (LDS) analysis was conducted for Area 7 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. III-38 Chapter 3:. Table 3 provides data on the availability of water and sewer facilities within Area 7. According to the table, water and sewer lines are fully established in the area and are provided by Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA). CODE ENFORCEMENT The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts of annexing Area 7, and did not note any code compliance issues. FARMS LEVEL OF SERVICE The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS Table 6 indicates the areas where the existing roadways within Area 7 meet or do not meet the City's current roadway standards. The existing roadways are gated and the responsibility of the community and were not evaluated. The City does not anticipate any jurisdictional transfer of 111-39 Chapter 3: road rights -of -way or maintenance responsibility under this annexation, therefore, roadway improvements cost is not considered in the annual expenses table below. The City, per Section 62-53 of the Code of Ordinances, cannot assume maintenance responsibility of any public roadway rights -of -way that do not meet the City's roadway standards. Because the roads in this area do not meet current City standards, they would have to be repaired by the current owner or could be improved using the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. AREA 7 Table 6. Road Existing Conditions (1) 'G bB CA 49 bm � a C7 Road Name v� ° 'n a bG 'v1 Comments C4 v Eastpointe - - - - - - - - - GATED Old Marsh - - - - - - - - - GATED Marsh Parkway A A A A A A A A A Note: (1) Referto Table 2.2 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 7 indicates that Area 7 is covered by Palm Beach Gardens Fire Station No. 4 & 5 and Palm Beach County Station No. 16. The average response time for this area is 9:38 minutes. Information regarding emergency calls and crimes committed received from the Palm Beach County Sheriffs office is listed in Table 7. Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 0 1/0 1/2015 and 12/3112015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics 111-40 Chapter 3: EXPENDTTURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 7. The total estimated annual revenue is $2,508,559. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and G1S Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6% franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City Services and Solid Waste services to the proposed annexation areas. The City estimates that $619,186.65 would be needed for debris removal expense in the event of a direct hit from a Category 3 Hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, the City should consider the economic impact of the additional responsibility of debris removal after annexing the area. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and estimated annual cost of extending City services to Area 7. The table shows that the City would potentially gain $2.3 million in annual revenue upon annexation into the City. 111-41 Chapter 3: 1611 WAN GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area S is located at the southeast end of the City's limits. The area is 332 acres, and is bounded by Northlake Boulevard to the north, Military Trail to the east, Woodbine residential community in .Riviera Beach to the south, and Horseshoe Acres to the west. The area includes the Square Lake residential neighborhood, Aleles Subdivision, unrecorded subdivisions of the Square Lake School tract, Macedonian Orthodox Church, Northlake Corporate Park, Tuscany Center Office Condo, Square Lake North, Centre, South Commercial Condos, Square Lake Plaza, and several single user commercial properties along Military Trail. Square Lake currently has 167 dwelling units, housing 353 people. alit U �'iPYa"Liri lriP•i�./'�1�i.i� � �_��-_ _. __ _ __ Area. S is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Military Trail, and is approximately ''A mile west of Interstate 95. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 below presents the land use and zoning designations of Area S. The area is comprised of large single-family residential lots and retail and general commercial uses along Northlake Boulevard, which bounds Area 8 to the north. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. 111-42 Chapter 3: At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's land use and zoning of Area 8 for compatibility and consistency with the City's land use and zoning criteria. AREA 8 'Table 1. I -and Use and Zoning Area Existing Future Zoning Land Use Land Use Square Lake Residential Single Family LR-1 RE (Residential Estate), and RT Residential (Residential Transitional) CS (Commercial Specialized), Commercial on Military Retail and CG, MUPD (Multiuse Planned Trail (i.e.: Northlake General CLf l Development), CC (Community Corporate Park) Commercial Commercial), and CN (Neighborhood Commercial) The estimated population is provided in Table 2. Area 8 has a current population of 353 and a total number of 167 dwelling units. This residential capacity analysis indicates that there is potential for residential growth in Area 8, and that there are existing facilities on site with a range of services provided by the County. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2016. I EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) I A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 8 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER SU.A is currently not serving all of the residential portions of Area 8 with water or sanitary sewer service. Some areas have access but have not connected at this time. Since water and sewer improvements are not considered in this annexation study, these costs are not considered in the annual expenses table below. if these improvements are to be considered in the future, they could be financed as part of the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. 11 i-43 Chapter I XG-0 Ali a1► ► 0107 T44 Xu i DWI The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area S, and noted existing code compliance issues and violations in Table 4. Table 4. Code Enforcement Area Issues, Violations, and Comments Single family homes on large parcels include common violations, such Square Lake as; property maintenance standards, storage and number of Residential boats/trailers/RV's and repairs to exterior of houses. Large number of accessory structures in the front setback. Commercial on Newer commercial properties in good condition, but with many vacant Military Trail (i.e.. suites. Older commercial properties violations include; dumpsters not Northlake Corporate enclosed, parking lots not properly striped, potholes in parking lots, Park) and some roof and exterior walls/fences in need of repair or painting. Landscaping needs to be maintained on vacant lots. PARKS AND PUBLIC SERVICES The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. 111-44 Chapter 3: EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS Table 6 indicates the condition of the existing roadways within Area 8 relative to the City's roadway level of service. As indicated below, the majority of the existing roadways meets or exceeds City's current level of service. Since the City does not anticipate any jurisdictional transfer of road rights -cif --way or maintenance responsibility under this annexation, therefore, roadway improvements cost is not considered in the annual expenses table below. Lille Q Road Name ri a Comments 4511 Street North C B B D C D D D A 82ud Street North and B A A D A D D D A South Lillian Avenue A A A D A D D D A No Cul-de-Sac North 80" Road B A B D A D D D A North Bates A A A D A D D D A North Elizabeth Avenue A A A D A D D D A North Kay Street B A A D A D D D A No Cul-de-Sac North Virginia Avenue A A A D A D D D A South Bates A A A D A D D D A South Elizabeth Avenue B A A D A D D D A South Ka Street A A A D A D D D A I No Cul-de-Sac South Virginia Avenue A A A D A D D D A Square Lake Drive A A A D A D D D A Nate: (1) Refer to Table 21 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Area 8 is covered by Palm Beach Gardens Fire Station No. 3. The average response time for this area is 5:28 minutes. Information regarding emergency calls and crimes committed received from the Palm Beach County Sheriff's office is listed in Table 7. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) 111-45 Chapter 3: Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01 /01 /2015 and 12/3 1/2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 8. The total estimated annual revenue is $547,+62+6. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Ease. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and GIS Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 60/a franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City services to Area 8. The City estimates that $124,080.68 would be needed for debris removal expense in the event of a direct hit from a Category 3 Hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, the City should consider the economic impact of the additional responsibility of debris removal after annexing the area. Note: III-46 Chapter 3: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and estimated annual cost of extending City services to Area 8. The table shows that the City would potentially gain approximately $511,230 in annual revenue upon annexation into the City. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) 111-47 Chapter 3: I J GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area 9 is located at the southeast end of the City's limits. The area is 93 acres in size and is bounded by Gardens Oaks to the north, Military Trail to the west, I-95 to the east and Palms Edge Rest Home, Palm Beach Lakes Church of Christ, and Next Millennium Nursery to the south. It includes the Windsor Mobile Home Park and Grove Park Elementary. Windsor Park contains 430 dwelling units and 899 residents. Area 9 is bordered by the City of Palm Beach Gardens to the north and Riviera Beach on the south and east. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 below presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 9. Existing uses within the area include a public school (Grove Park. Elementary), and the Windsor Park mobile home park. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's land use and zoning designations of Area 9 for compatibility and consistency with the City's land use and zoning criteria. ! I I-48 Chapter 3: POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population and number of dwelling units is provided in Table 2. This residential capacity analysis indicates that existing facilities have been fully constructed and functional within Area 9. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 9 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Table 3 provides data on the availability of water and sewer facilities within Area 9. Per the table, water and sewer lines are fully established in the area and are provided by Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA). 111-49 Chapter 3: CODE ENFORCEMENT The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area 9, and did not note any major compliance issues. PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS Table 6 indicates the areas where the existing roadways within Area 9 meet or do not meet the City's current LOS. As indicated below, a majority of the existing roadways meet or exceed the City's level of service. The City does not anticipate any jurisdictional transfer of road rights -of - way or maintenance responsibility under this annexation, therefore, roadway improvements cost is not considered in the annual expenses table below. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) Chapter 3: AREA 9 Table6. Existing Road Conditions v ., tin `M w "0 C C Road Name ci ,° .a .� 'YZ Comments V Autumn Trail A B A D B D D A A Speed humps East Four Seasons A B A D B D D A A 'Speed humps Entrances {S and N Four A A A A B D D A A Speed humps Seasons Fall Circle A B A D B D D A A Speed humps North Four Seasons A B A D B I D D A A Speed humps South Four Seasons A B A D B D D A A Speed humps Spring Circle A B A D B D D A A Speed hum s Spring Trail A B A D B D D A A Speed humps Summer Circle A B A D B D D A A Speed humps Summer Wind Trail A B A D B D D A A Speed humps West Four Seasons A B A D B D D A A Speed humps Street Winter Lane A B A D B D D A A Speed humps Winter Park lane A B 1A1 D B D D A A Speed humps ]dote: (1) Refer to Table 2.2 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 7 indicates that Area 9 is covered by Palm Beach Gardens Fire Station No. 3. Currently, the average response time is approximately 7:06 minutes. Information regarding emergency calls and crimes committed received from the Palm Beach County Slierifrs office is listed in Table 7. I11-51 Chapter 3: Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 9. The total estimated annual revenue is $199,378. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and G1S Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2„400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6% franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City Services and Solid Waste to Area. 9. The City estimates that $241,365.63 would be needed for debris removal expense in the event of a direct hit from a Category 3 Hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEIIA, and this expense is not an annual cost, the City should consider the economic impact of the additional responsibility of debris removal after annexing the area - Public Services Solid Waste I Total $5,541 1 $39,798 1 $45,339 Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. 111-52 Chapter 3: Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and estimated annual cost of extending City services to Area 1. The table shows that the City would potentially gain approximately $154,039 in annual revenue upon annexation into the City. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank) 111-53 Chapter 3: AREA 10 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area 10 is located at the southeast end of the City limits. The area is 250 acres, and is bounded by Northlake Boulevard and Sandtree Residential community to the north, Lake Park (C-17 canal) to the east, 1-95, Sandtree Residential community, and Crossroads at Northlake (aka Northlake Commons) to the west and Riviera Beach to the south. This area includes the Central Industrial Park, Arcadia Burma Apartments, Evergreen Acres, Parkway Village, Schumacher Automotive, Wallace Lincoln Mercury, and several other commercial and industrial properties on Northlake Boulevard. The area has 349 dwelling units and 738 residents. Area 10 is surrounded by the City of Palm Leach Gardens, Lake Park, and Riviera Beach. LANK USE AND ZONING Table i below presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 10. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. 111-54 Chapter 3: At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's land use and zoning designations of Area 10 for compatibility and consistency with the City's land use and zoning criteria. AREA 10 Table 1. Land LJse and Areas Zoning Existing Land Use Future Land Use Zoning Central Industrial Park Industrial Park Industrial (1114I3) IL (Light Industrial) North High Residential, 12 Parkway Village Single-family attached units 1 Acre (HR-12) RM (Multi -Family (Duplexes) & Low Residential, 3 Residential Medium) units 1 Acre LR-3 Evergreen Acres Mix of Single -Family and High Residential, 8 RM (Multi -Family Multi -Family units f Acre HR-8) Residential Medium Northern Palm Beach Medium Residential, IL (Light Industrial) County Improvement ©pen Area 5 units !Acre (MR-5) & RS (Residential District Drainage Area Single Family) Arcadia Burma Multi -Family Apartment High Residential, 8 RM (Multi -Family Apartments Buildings units 1 Acre (HR-8) Residential Medium) John W. Frensley Single Family Residential Low Residential, 3 RM (Multi -Family Propeq Home units 1 Acre LR-3 Residential Medium Northlake Commercial 2 Automobile Commercial High CG (Commercial Dealerships CH General Car Dealership along Commercial High CG (Commercial Sandtree Drive Automobile Dealership with an underlying General) (Shumacher) HR-8 CH-8) Industrial Use Building Northlake Industrial and Storage and Fast Industrial (IND) IL (Light Industrial) Food Restaurant Parcel behind Northlake Multi -Family Industrial {IND} RM (Multi -Family Industrial Residential Medium) POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population and number of dwelling units is provided in Table 2. Area 10 has a population of 738. Source: Source: 2010 Census Data 111-55 Chapter 3: EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A Level of Service (LDS) analysis was conducted for Area 10 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. Both SUA and Riviera Beach Utilities provide water and sewer service to projects within Area 10, except for Evergreen Acres residential subdivision. Evergreen Acres does not have potable water or sanitary sewer service at this time. Since water and sewer improvements are not considered in this annexation study, these costs are not considered in the annual expenses table below. If these improvements are to be considered in the future, they could be financed as part of the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Black Grant or any other alternative means of financing. Area 10 Table 3. Water and Sewer Area Water Sewer Northlake Commercial In place In place Arcadia Burma Apartments In place In place Parkway Village In place In place Evergreen Acres (Betty Anne) Not in place Not in place Central Industrial Park North. In place (Riviera Beach) In place (Riviera Beach) CODE ENFORCEMENT The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area 10, and noted some existing code compliance issues and violations in Table 4. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) 111-56 Chapter 3: Area 10 Table 4. Code Enforcement Area Issues, Violations, and Comments Northlake Commercial Common violations noted include: storage of boats and trailers, outdoor storage and signage. Vehicles parked on lawn, landscaping overgrown, storage and Arcadia Burma Apartments, number of boats/trailers/commercial vehicleslRVs not properly Evergreen Acres, and screened, and exterior walls need to be maintained, pressure Parkway Village cleaned or repainted inoperable vehicles. Arcadia Burma Apartments roads are extremely bumpy. Central industrial Park Common violations include; unscreened dumpsters, storage of Vehicles and materials on the property and signage. PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. Projected Population Level of Service (acres) Comments Served (estimated) 738 3.69 Required None I WI -F-1 11001 Zf7:�7�.'1:�'�ilr�►l liL��►1;y Table 6 indicates where the existing roadways within Area 10 meet or do not meet the City's roadway LDS. The City does not anticipate any jurisdictional transfer of road rights -of -way or maintenance responsibility under this annexation, therefore, roadway improvements cost is not considered in the annual expenses table below. The City, per Section 62-53 of the Code of Ordinances, cannot assume maintenance responsibility of any public roadway rights -of -way that do not meet the City's roadway standards. Because the roads in this area do not meet current City standards, they would have to be repaired by the current owner or could be improved using the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) 111-57 Chapter 3: IM v � Road Name CA.p .' Q a coo Comments Amy Avenue D D C D D D D D D j Dirt road Betty Ann Court B B B D B D D D B Burma Circle A B D B D D D D B Burma Court A B B B B B A B B Dirt Road Burma Road A B B D B D D D B Constellation A B B D B C D D B Asphalt Sidewalk Consumer B C A C B D A D A Crater Terrace A B B ID B D D D B Currency B C B D B D B D B Dann Blvd D D C D D D D D D Dirt Road Dawn Blvd D D D D D D D D B Fiscal C C A D B D B D A Garden Road A B A A A A A D A Investment A B A A A A A D A Lynda]] Lane B B B D B D D D B Monetary B C A D B D B D A Pluto A B B D B D D D B Resource B B A A A A A D A Satellite Terrace A B B D B D D D B Shares A C A D B D B D A Sol Terrace A B B D B ID D D B Uranus A B B D B D D D B Williams Street A B B D B D D I D I B Note; (1) Refer to Cable 2.2 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 7 indicates that Area 10 is covered by Palm Beach County Station No. 68. The average response time to this area 7:46 minutes. Fire Rescue is concerned that this area is bifurcated by a Northern Improvement District Easement and access through the area is obstructed. Therefore, the access to the southern portion of the area is a further distance for Fire Rescue. Information regarding emergency calls and crimes committed received from the Palm Beach County Sheriff's office is listed in Table 7. 111-58 Chapter 3: Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDXTUMS AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 10. The total estimated annual revenue is $560,881. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and CIS Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400 (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6°/a franchise fee Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City Services and Solid Waste to the proposed annexation area. The City estimates that $224,821.54 would be needed for debris removal expense in the event of a direct hit from a Category 3 Hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, the City should consider the economic impact of the additional responsibility of debris removal after annexing the area. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. 111-59 Chapter 3: Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and estimated annual cost of extending City services to Area 10. The table shows that the City would potentially gain $507,698 in annual revenue upon annexation into the City. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.), Chapter 3: AREA 11 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area 11 is located at the southeastern end of the City's limits. This unincorporated area is 40 acres in size, and is bounded by Palm Beach Square Units 2-6 to the north and west, I-95 to the east, and an incorporated commercial plaza along Northlake to the south. Since the property on the opposite side (to the east) of 1-95 is also unincorporated, the property is surrounded by the City's boundary on three sides, to the north, west, and south. Area 1 I is an existing enclave surrounded by the City of Palm Beach Gardens. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 below presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 11. The area is a single- family residential community. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. The City should review and assess the County"s land use and zoning of Area 11 for compatibility and consistency with the City's land use and zoning criteria. Elf-61 Chapter 3: Llz1] 1111!'�_�LCI]► ► �]�Lllu M�01,M]a All 1111.1�►Ll111�I fl lf�" The estimated population and number of dwelling units is provided in Table 2. Area 11 has a population of36b. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A Level of Service (LDS) analysis was conducted for Area 1 I using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Table 3 provides data on the availability of water and sewer facilities within Area 11. According to the table, water and sewer lines are fully established in the area and are provided by Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA). The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area 11, and noted some existing code compliance issues and violations in Table 4. I11-62 Chapter 3: Issues, Violations, and Comments Residential properties had these common violations: Storage of boats/trailers/ commercial vehicleslRVs on the property, exterior maintenance (pressure clean/repaint/minor repairs), landscanina overgrowth, and vehicles narked on lawn. PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE The area is in driving distance of Various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. EXISTING ROAD CONDITIONS Table 6 indicates that all the road surfaces within Area I meet or exceed the City's LOS. The City does not anticipate any jurisdictional transfer of road rights -of -way or maintenance responsibility under this annexation, therefore, roadway improvements cost is not considered in the annual expenses table. The City, per Section 62-53 of the Code of Ordinances, cannot assume maintenance responsibility of any public roadway rights -of -way that do not meet the City's roadway standards. Because the roads in this area do not meet current City standards, they would have to be repaired by the current owner or could be improved using the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. III-63 Chapter 3: R Road Conditions Road Name V� Z r Comments o A 6. G' a Alleyways B B C D C Birmingham B B A D B B D D B Road Cracking Bloomfield B B A D B B D D B Road Cracking Keating C B A D B B B D B Road Cracking, Seed Bumps Northville B B A D B B D D B Road Cracking Rochester C B A D B B D D B Road Cracking Note: ( 1) Refer to Table 2.2 1319 NOD 11t11 DWA 111► A'L Mi3Y T CIiTTuri ►k Table 7 indicates that Area 11 is covered by Palm Beach Gardens Fire Station No. 3. Currently, the average response time is approximately 5:37 minutes. Information regarding emergency calls and crimes committed received from the Palm Beach County Sheriff's office is listed in Table 7. Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 11. The total estimated annual revenue is $104,179. Chapter 3: Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and GIS Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400 (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6% franchise fee Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City services and Solid Waste to the proposed annexation areas. The City estimates that $72,571.92 would be needed for debris removal expense in the event of a direct hit from a Hurricane Class 3. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, the City should consider the economic impact of the additional responsibility of debris removal after annexing the area. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and estimated annual cost of extending City grounds maintenance and solid waste services to Area 11. The table shows that the City would potentially gain approximately $78,911 in annual revenue upon annexation into the City. 111-65 Chapter 3: AREA 12 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area 12 is an existing enclave located at the southeastern limits of the City. This 129-acre area is in the unincorporated lands east of Interstate 95, north of Northlake Boulevard, west of fake Catherine, and south of Plat 3. This area includes Roan court, Goolsby Subdivision, Sun Terrace, and non-residential parcels such as Napleton North Palen Auto Park. Area 12 includes a mix of single and multi -family residential properties, heavy commercial uses, general retail, professional and medical office uses. This area has experienced several redevelopment efforts; however, significant upgrades to the infrastructure are needed to the properties along Roan Lane. .Area 12 is an existing enclave and is surrounded on four (4) sides by the City of Palm Beach Gardens. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 below presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 12. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. [W.I.- Chapter 3° At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's land use and zoning designations of Area 12 for compatibility and consistency with the City's land use and zoning criteria. R 12 TableEA Area Existing Land Use Future Land Use Zoning Roan Lane Church HR--12, HR-8 RM (Multi -family Medium INST Density Residential), CG Goolsby Single Family and Multi- - RM (Multi -family Medium Subdivision FamilyResidential Density Residential) Sun Terrace Multi -Family Townhomes HR-8 RM (Multi -family Medium Density Residential) Northlake Auto Dealership, general CH-8, CH CG (General Commercial) Commercial I retail, medical office uses POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population and number of dwelling units is provided in Table 2. Area 12 has a population of 1,398. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 12 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER. AND SEWER SUA is Currently not serving the Roan Lane and Goolsby subdivisions with the sanitary sewer. Potable water is currently available to the all residents within Area 12, except for the Goolsby Subdivision. Since water and sewer improvements are not considered in this annexation study, these costs are not considered in the annual expenses table below. If these improvements are to be considered in the future, they could be financed as park of the City's Neighborhood Chapter 3: Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. Area Water Sewer Roan Lane In Place In place except for north end Goolsby Subdivision Not in place Not in place Sun Terrace In Place In Place Park Lane Villas, Dove Landing, Elwood Estates, Acacia Gardens, October Park In Place In Place North Iake Commercial In Place In Place CODE ENFORCEMENT The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area 12, and noted some existing code compliance issues and violations in Table 4. Area Issues Roan Lane Residential: - RV/BoatlCornmercial vehicle ltrailerslRVs on property, Goolsby Subdivision - Exterior maintenance for wall/driveways/ roofs (pressure Sun Terrace clean/repaint/repairs) - Landscaping overgrowth, vehicles parked on lawn, Park Lane Villas, Dove - No dumpster enclosure in residential community Landing, Elwood Estates, - Vehicles in ROW Acacia Gardens, October _ Graffiti (Roan Lane) Park - Sun Terrace has improved since last site visit Commercial: Northlake Commercial - Signage, maintenance of buildings - Accessory structure at Na leton PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. Chapter 3: ROADWAY EXISTING CONDITIONS Table 6 indicates the areas where the existing roadways within Area 12 meet or do not meet the City's current roadway LOS. As indicated below, the majority of the existing roadways are not striped, do not contain street lights, and are poorly graded. Roadway improvements are needed throughout this area.. The City, per Section 62-53 of the Code of Ordinances, cannot assume maintenance responsibility of any public roadway rights -of -way that do not meet the City's roadway standards. Because the roads in this area do not meet current City standards, they would have to be repaired by the current owner or could be improved using the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. AREA 12 ace CA q 0 Road Name Q b �i In Silver Horn B D A D D D D D A Sun Terrace Circle A A A A D D D D A 91' North A A A D A D D D A Sun Court A B A D D D D D A Dead end Street Sunrise Drive B B A A B D B D A Dead end Street Van Cott St A A A D A A D C A Van Cott Circle A A A D A A D C A Dove Landing Road A A A A A D D D A 92°d Lane North B D A D D D D D A Roan Lane parcel B A A A D D B A D Park Lane Villa A A A D D D D D A Road Roan Court E B B A D C B C D A Roan Court W B B A D C A C D A Chapel Street A B A D C B D A A III-69 Chapter 3: AREA 12 Table 6. Road Existing Conditions Road Name Wilshire Street A B A D C A D A A 931 Lane D D B D C D D D C Harwood Street A B A D C A D A A Kenas Street A B A D C A D A A Note: (1) Refer to Table 2.2 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 7 indicates that Area 12 is covered by Palm Beach Gardens Fire Station No. 3. Currently, the average response time is approximately 6:45 minutes. Information regarding emergency calls and crimes committed received from the Palm Beach County Sheriff's office is listed in Table 7. Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 12. The total estimated annual revenue is $445,825. 111-70 Chapter 3: Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and Gl'S Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6% franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City Services and Solid Waste services to Area 12. In addition, it is estimated that $332,641.13 is needed for debris removal expense in the event of a Category 3 hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, it should be considered in the annexation analysis. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and estimated annual cost of extending City services to Area 12. The table shows that the City would potentially gain approximately $378,777 in annual revenue upon annexation into the City. III-71 Chapter 3: AREA 13 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area 13 is an existing enclave located at the City's southeastern limits. The area is approximately 35 acres, contains a mixture of commercial and residential uses, and is surrounded by parcels located within the City of Palm Beach Gardens. This area is bordered by Christ Fellowship and the Hunt Club on the west, Ballenlsles on the north and east, and Horseshoe Acres to the south. Area 13 is the current location of the Palm Beach County Adult Day Care and Place of Hope. Area 13 is an existing enclave surrounded by the {City of Palm Beach Gardens on four (4) sides. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 13. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's future land use and zoning designations of Area 13 for compatibility and consistency with the City's future land use and zoning criteria. 111-72 Chapter I Existing Land Use Future Land Use Zoning f Institutional and LR-1 and INST18 I AR, PUD, PO Single -Family homes POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population and number of dwelling units is provided in Table 2. Area 13 has a population of 15. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS I A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 13 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Table 3 provides data on the availability of water and sewer facilities within Area 13. Howell Lane residential lots are not provided with water and sewer utilities and are currently served by well water and septic tank systems. Since water and sewer improvements are not considered in this annexation study, these costs are not considered in the annual expenses table below. If these improvements are to be considered in the future, they could be financed as part of the +City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. 11VA] Chapter 3: CODE ENFORCEMENT The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area 13 and noted some existing code compliance issues and violations, which are listed in Table 4. Violations and Comments Residential (2-story duplexes): -Storage and boats, trailers, RVs, commercial vehicles on property -Vehicles parked on lawn (minimal) -Repairs to exterior of house (walls -minimal) PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. t W4 6�I I IIn 61Tlll,111101■M1Id1411Wf0 it 1i-to] �M Table 6 shows the condition of road surfaces, right-of-way width, drainage, curbing, grading, sidewalks, striping, street lighting, and road signage, which were analyzed by staff and assigned letter grades as described in Table 2.2 in Chapter 2. Table 6 indicates that all of the existing roadways within Area 13 meet or exceed the City's LOS. Both Isaiah Lane and Hidden Hollow are located within gated communities and are the responsibility of the community. The City, per Section 62-53 of the Code of Ordinances, cannot assume maintenance responsibility of any public roadway rights -of -way that do not meet the City's roadway standards. Because the roads in this area do not meet current City standards, they would have to be repaired by the current owner or could be improved using the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing.. 111-74 Chapter 3: AREA Table 6. Road ExistingConditions ta Road Name rig ,.a Z� Comments gZ L U '�.+' Qn C% }r to Isaiah Lane A A A D A D C D C Gated Hidden Hollow - - - - - - - - - Gated Howell Lane B A A C A A B C A Dead end Note: (1) Please refer to Table 2.2 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 7 indicates that Area 13 is covered by Palm Beach Gardens Fire Station No. 3. Currently, the average response time is approximately 4:56 minutes. Table 7 also illustrates that the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office received 89 calls for police service over a one (1) year period. There were also 48 documented crimes in this area over a one (1) year period. Fire Rescue Law Enforcement {�1 First Responder Station Avg. Response Time (1) No. of Calls per Year No. of Crimes per Year PBG Station No. 3 4:56 min. (22 calls) 89 48 Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDITURES AND REVENUE'S Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 13. The total estimated annual revenue is $6,393. 111-75 Chapter 3: Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and GIS Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of$2,400 and multiplying by the {%o franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City Services and Solid Waste services to Area 13. The total estimated annual cost is approximately $1,313. In addition, it is estimated that $2,974.26 is needed for debris removal expense in the event of a Category 3 Hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, it should be considered in the annexation analysis. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and cost of extending City services to Area 13.. Annexation of Area 13 would generate approximately $5,080 in annual City revenue. III-76 Chapter 3: AREA 14 GENERAL DESCIUPTION Area 14 is an existing enclave located at the City's southeastern limits and is approximately 107 acres. The area contains mostly single and multi -family residential uses along with a few commercial uses. The commercial uses within Area 14 include Cornerstone Presbyterian Church, Metropolitan Community Church, and Villa Palma at Northlake. Area 14 is surrounded by the City of Palm Beach Gardens an three (3) sides and unincorporated Palm Beach County on the south. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 below presents the future land use and zoning designations of Area 14. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's future land use and zoning designations of Area 14 for compatibility and consistency with the City's future land use and zoning criteria. III-77 Chapter 3: AREA 14 Zonino Table 1. Land Use Area and Existing Land Use Future Land Use Zoning Medium Residential, 5 RM (Multi -Family units 1 Acre (MR-5), Residential High High Residential, 8 units Density), AR Green Meadows / Acre (HR-8), (Agricultural Institutional (INST), Residential), RS Multi -Family, Single- Low Residential, 1 unit I (Single Family Family, Commercial, Acre (LR-1) Residential) Highland Pines Institutional High Residential 12 RM (Multi -Family Residential High Agricultural units 1 Acre (HRj12) Density), High Residential, 8 units RM (Multi -Family Villa Palma at 1 Acre (HR-8) and Residential High Northlake Commercial High with Density), and CG an underlying HR-8 (General CH-8 Commercial The estimated population and number of dwelling units is provided in Table 2. Area 14 has a population of 1,277. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS A Level of Service (LGS) analysis was conducted for Area 14 using data provided to the Planning and. Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Table 3 illustrates that both water and sewer service currently exist throughout all of Area 14. No additional services are necessary. 111-78 Chapter 3: The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area 14, and noted a number of existing code compliance issues and violations, which are listed in Table 4. AREA 14 Table 4. Code Enforcement Area Violations and Comments Residential (single family and duplexes): -Storage of boats/trailers/commercial vehicles/RVs on property -Exterior maintenance Green Meadows, -Illegal driveways Highland Pines -Landscaping missing or overgrowth -Dead trees -Vehicles parked on lawn, -Inoperable vehicles -Waste dumpers on property Residential (gated community): -Exterior presents good conditions Villa Palma at Commercial: Northlake -Good condition, most common violation include outdoor storage (behind building) -Signage (sign attached to tree) PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. III-79 Chapter 3-- ROADWAY EXISTING CONDITIONS Table 6 indicates the areas where the existing roadways within Area 14 meet or do not meet the City's current roadway LOS. As indicated below, the majority of the existing roadways are not striped, do not contain street lights, and are poorly graded. Villa. Palma is located within a gated community and was not evaluated. The City, per Section 62-53 of the Code of Ordinances, cannot assume maintenance responsibility of any public roadway rights -of -way that do not meet the City's roadway standards. Because the roads in this area do not meet current City standards, they would have to be repaired by the current owner or could be improved using the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. an e, tZ an asCA 0 x a� 14 Road Name �n lira Comments U U v Peebles Road D C D D C D D D D Bonanza Court B C D D C D D D D Williams Road D C D D C D D D D E Highland Drive B B i A A D A D D A W Highland Drive B B A A D A D D A Highland Pines Trail A B A A D A D D A Brady Lane B B A D C B D D A Arthur Street B B A D C B D D A Trail Pines Ave C A A D A A D D A E. Highland Pines Blvd A A A A D A D D A W. Highland Pines Blvd B A A A D A D D A Villa Palma - - - - - - - - - Gated Green Meadows B C A D C D D D A Note: (1) Refer to Table 2.2 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 7 indicates that Area 14 is covered by Palm Beach Gardens Fire Station No. 3. Currently, the average response time is approximately 5.06 minutes. HM Chapter 3: Table 7 also illustrates that the Palm Beach Sheriff's office received 525 calls for police service over a one (1) year period. There were also 145 documented crimes in this area over a one (1) year period. AREA 14 Table 7. Fire Rescue and LavN- Enforcement Fire Rescue Law Enforcement cal First Responder Avg. Response No. of Cans per Year No. of Crimes per Station Time (1) Year PBG Station No. 3 5:06 min. (104 calls) 525 145 Note- (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01 /01 /2015 and 12/31 /2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 14. The total estimated annual revenue is $419,330. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and G1'S Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6D/a franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City services to Area 14. In addition, it is estimated that $299,246.51 is needed for debris removal expense in the event of a Category 3 hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, it should be considered in the annexation analysis. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) 111-81 Chapter 3: Public Services I Solid Waste I Total $11,690 1 $51,035 1 $62,725 Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and cost of extending City grounds maintenance and solid waste services to Area 14. Annexation of Area 14 would generate approximately $356,605 in annual revenue for the City. Total Revenue I Potential Expenses I Net Revenue $419,330 1 $62,725 j $356,605 (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) 111-82 Chapter 3: AREA 15 GENERAL DESCMPTION Area 15 is located in the southwestern limits of the City's boundary, and is an existing enclave. The site is approximately 284 acres, and contains two (2) residential communities, Carleton Oaks and Osprey Isles. The remaining portion of the area is comprised of conservation lands. Area 15 is bordered by on the north and east by Conservation Preserved land, and on the west by the City's municipal golf course. LAND USE AND ZONING Table I below presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 15. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. The area is primarily residential in nature except for a cemetery and a County approved treatment facility. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County"s future land use and zoning designations of Area 15 for compatibility and consistency with the City's future land use and zoning criteria. III-83 Chapter 3: POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population and number of dwelling units is provided in Table 2. Area 15 has a. population of 516. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS A Level of Service (LGS) analysis was conducted for Area 15 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Table 3 illustrates that both water and sewer service currently exist throughout all of Area 15 and are receiving "Interim Service by West Palm Beach". "Interim Service by West Palm Beach" means that the property is within Seacoast's legal service area but since extension of off -site lines connecting to Seacoast facilities would have been cost -prohibitive, Seacoast has authorized temporary connection to nearer City of West Palm Beach utility facilities. Seacoast is planning to assume ownership of these internal water/sewer improvements and commence service to the parcels only when land development activities in that area make extension of off -site facilities through a bulk water and sewer agreement with Palm Beach County. 111--84 Chapter .3: CODE ENFORCEMENT The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area 15, and noted only a minimal number of existing code violations, which area listed in Table 4. PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE Area 15 contains one (1) public park that is currently owned and maintained by Palm Beach County. There are also parks, open space, and conservation areas located within the two (2) gated communities, which are maintained by their respective associations. The conservation area within Carleton Oaks is owned by Palm Beach County, and the conservation area. within Osprey Isles is owned by the community. These communities are in close proximity to the City Golf Course. ROADWAY EXISTING CONDITIONS Both communities located within Area 15, Carleton Oaks and Osprey Isles, are gated. The roads are private, and are in good condition. The City does not anticipate any jurisdictional transfer of road rights -of -way or maintenance responsibility under this annexation, therefore, roadway improvements cost is not considered in the annual expenses table below. 111-85 Chapter 3: AREA 15 Table 6. Road E-tistino Condition e,.�. L. 10 W 0 U A �A C Community Name z .� tsb a s Comments Osprey Isles A A A A A A A A A Gated Carleton Oaks A A A A A A A A A Gated Note: (1) Refer to Table 2.2 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 7 indicates that Area 15 is serviced by West Palm Beach Fire Station No. 8. Currently, the average response time is approximately 7:51 minutes. Due to the low call volume and activity in Area 16, all data have been included in the data. for Area 15. This is reflected in the table below. Fire Rescue commented that West Palm Beach Station 8 is currently in this annexation area. Also, it is noted that West Palm Beach Station 8 will continue to service the area until the future Palm Beach Gardens Avenir Station is functional. Table 7 also illustrates that the Palm Beach Sheriff's office received 141 calls for police service over a one (1) year period. There were also 36 documented crimes in this area over a one (1) year period. Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between o 1 /0112015 and 12131 /2015 (2) Includes data generated from Area 16 (3) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics (The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.) lil-86 Chapter 3: EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area I5. The total estimated annual revenue is $359,130. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and G1S Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5°/n franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6%s franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City Services and Solid Waste services to Area 15. The total estimated annual cost is approximately $28,075. In addition, it is estimated that $102,314.51 is needed for debris removal expense in the event of a Category 3 hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, it should be considered in the annexation analysis. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and cost of extending City services to Area 15. Annexation of Area 15 would generate approximately $331,055 in net annual revenue for the City. I Il-87 Chapter 3: (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) 11L.* :j Chapter 3: AREA 16 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area 16 is located in the southwestern limits of the City's boundary and is bordered on three sides by the City of Palm Beach Gardens. The site is approximately 94 acres, and is currently vacant. Area 16 is bordered by on the north and west by the Spear's property and on the east by the City's golf course. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 below presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 16. The Area is currently vacant, and is known as the Balsamo property. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's future land use and zoning designations of Area 16 for compatibility and consistency with the City's future land use and zoning criteria. 111-89 Chapter 3: Area Existing Land Use Future Land Use Zoning Balsamo Property Vacant Rural Residential, 1 unit f AR (Agricultural 20 Acres (RR-20) Residential) POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population is provided in Table 2. There are currently no dwelling units within Area 16; however, based on the area's requested future land use designation, there is a future potential for a total of 97 dwelling units. Source. 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 16 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Table 3 illustrates that Area 16 is a future service area for Seacoast Utility Authority. Since the Area is currently vacant, no services currently exist. The Seacoast Utility Authority plans to provide both water and sewer services through a bulk water and sewer service agreement with Palm Beach County. The developer of this parcel will be responsible to construct any necessary infrastructure for these services. MY Chapter 3; CODE ENFORCEMENT The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area lb. The Area is currently vacant. PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. This area is in close proximity to the City Golf Course. ROADWAY EXISTING CONDITIONS Area 16 is currently undeveloped and does not contain roadways. The developer of this area will be responsible to construct the infrastructure to the City of Palm Beach Gardens standards. FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 6 indicates that Area 16 is serviced by West Palm Beach Fire Station No. 8. Due to the minimal number of calls recorded to this area, all data from this area has been incorporated into Area 15. I it is noted that West Palm Beach Station 8 will continue to service the area until the future Palm Beach Gardens Avenir Station is functional. Table 6 also illustrates that the Palm Beach Sheriff's office received no calls for police service over a one (1) year period. There were no documented crimes in this area over a one (1) year period. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) 111-91 Chapter 3: Note: (1) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 7 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 16. The total estimated annual revenue is $22,844. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and GIS Divisions.. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6°% franchise fee. Table 8 presents estimated annual cost of extending City services to Area 16. There is no estimated annual cost related to Area 16. In addition, it is estimated that $72,058.18 is needed for debris removal expense in the event of a Category 3 hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, it should be considered in the annexation analysis. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. I11-92 Chapter 3. Table 9 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and expenditures of annexing Area 16. Annexation of Area 16 would generate approximately $12,659 of annual net revenue. Total Revenue I Potential Expenses I Net Revenue $22,844 j $10,185 1 $12,659 (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) 111-93 Chapter 3: AREA 17 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area 17 is located on Northlake Boulevard approximately seven (7) miles from the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and the Florida Turnpike. Area 17 is in the southwestern limits of the City's boundary and is surrounded by the City of Palm Beach Gardens on three (3) sides. The subject area is approximately 63 acres, and is currently vacant. Area 17 is in the southwestern limits of the City's boundary and is surrounded by the City of Palm Beach Gardens on three (3) sides. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 below presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 17. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's land use and zoning designations of Area 17 for compatibility and consistency with the City's land use and zoning criteria. 111-94 Chapter 3: POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population is provided in Table 2. There are currently no dwelling units within Area 17. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2415. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 17 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Table 3 illustrates that Area 17 is a future service area for Seacoast Utility Authority. Since the Area is currently vacant, no services currently exist. The Seacoast Utility Authority plans to provide both water and sewer services through a bulk water and sewer service agreement with Palm Beach County. The developer of this parcel will be responsible to construct any necessary infrastructure for these services. III-95 Chapter 3: CODE ENFORCEMENT The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area 17. The area is currently vacant and undeveloped. Violations and Comments No violations PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE The area is its driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. This area is in close proximity to the City Golf Course. ROADWAY EXISTING CONDITIONS Area 17 is currently undeveloped and does not contain any roadways. The developer of this area will be responsible to construct the infrastructure to the City of Palm Beach Gardens standards. FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 6 indicates that Area 17 is serviced by the City of West Palm Beach Station 8. The fire station did not report any calls to this area. It is noted that West Palm Beach Station 8 will continue to service the area until the future Palm Beach Gardens Avenir Station is functional. Table 6 also illustrates that the Palm Beach County Sheriff s office reported no calls occurring in this area. No crimes were reported. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) Chapter 3: AREA 17 Table 6. Fire Rescue and Law Enforcement Fire Rescue Law Enforcement ill First Responder Avg. Response No. of Calls per Year No. of Crimes per Station Time (1) year Nest Palm Beach Fire (0 calls) 0 0 Station 8 Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01 /01 /2015 and 12/31 /2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 7 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 17. The total estimated annual revenue is $2,302. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and G1S Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6% franchise fee. Table 8 presents estimated annual cost of extending City Services to Area 17. it is estimated that there is no annual cost associated with City Services or Solid 'Waste service to Area 17. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Table 9 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and cost of extending City services to Area 17. Annexation of Area 17 would generate approximately $2,302 in annual revenue to the City. 111-97 Chapter 3: (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) Ili-98 Chapter 3: AREA 18 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area 18 is located just west of the City's western boundary. The site is approximately 4,185 acres, and is currently vacant. Area 18 is bordered to the north by Beeline Highway and on the west by a canal. Area 18 lies along the south side of Beeline Highway and is located west of the City's current western boundary. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 below presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 18. The site is located at the City's western limits. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's future land use and zoning designations of Area 18 for compatibility and consistency with the City's future land use and zoning criteria. Chapter 3: POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population is provided in Table 2. There are currently no dwelling units within Area 18. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 18 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Table 3 illustrates that Area 18 is currently receiving water and sewer services from Palm Beach County. Palm Beach County will be the permanent provider for this area. No additional improvements are necessary. CODE ENFORCEMENT The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area 18. The area is currently vacant and undeveloped. III-100 Chapter 3: PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. Projected Population Level of Service (acres) Comments Served estimated 0 0 Required None ROADWAY EXISTING CONDITIONS Area 18 is currently undeveloped and does not contain any roadways. The developer of this area will be responsible to construct the infrastructure to the City of Palm Beach Gardens standards. FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Fable 6 indicates that Area 18 is serviced by Palm Beach County Fire Stations 14 7 22. There were no calls recorded to this area. Table 6 also illustrates that the Palm Beach Sheriffs office received 14 calls for police service over a one (I ) year period. There were also zero documented crimes in this area over a one (1) year period. Note: ( 1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01 f01 f 2015 and 12/31 /2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Clime Statistics EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 7 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 18. The total estimated annual revenue is $0. 111-101 Chapter 3: Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and GIS Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6% franchise fee. Table 8 presents the estimated annual cost of extending City services to Area 18. It is estimated that there are $1,814 annual costs associated with Area 18. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Table 9 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and cost of extending City services to Area 18. Annexation of Area 18 would cast the City $1,814 and produce no revenue, at this time, for the City. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) lit-102 Chapter 3: GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area 19 is located near the City's northwest limits, and is approximately 2,807 acres. The area contains large residential tracts. Area 19 is located along Beeline Highway approximately 1.5 miles southeast of the intersection of State Highway 711 and Beeline Highway. Area 19 is bordered by the City of Palm Beach Gardens on the east and south sides. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 below presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 19. Existing land uses in the area include the Caloosa residential community and an industrial park in the northwest portion of the subject site. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's future land use and zoning designations of Area 19 for compatibility and consistency with the City's future land use and zoning criteria. I I #-103 Chapter 3: POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population is provided in Table 2. There are currently 365 dwelling units within Area 19. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and. Business Research 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 19 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Table 3 illustrates that Area 19 is currently receiving water and sewer services from Palm Beach County. Palm Beach County will be the permanent provider for this area. No additional improvements are necessary. III-104 Chapter 3: CODEENFORCEMENT The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area 19, and noted numerous existing code compliance and violations, which are listed in Table 4. Violations and Comments Numerous potential code enforcement issues (unpaved driveways, commercial vehicles, trailers, RVs, watercrafts, vegetation overgrowth) PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. The roadways within Area 19 are private. Most of the road surfaces are in good condition. There are also equestrian trails throughout the area. The City does not anticipate any jurisdictional transfer of road rights -of -way or maintenance responsibility under this annexation, therefore, roadway improvements cost is not considered in the annual expenses table below. AREA 19 Road Conditions C� Road Name A Comments L y+ 125th Ave N - - - - - - - - - Private Road 128th Ave N - - - - - - - - - Private Road 130th Ave N - - - - - - - - - Private Road 140th St N - - - - - - - - - Private Road 141 st Ln N - - - - - - - - - Private Road II[-105 Chapter 3. AREA 19 Table I. E,.%isting Road Conditions Road Name , ,? .0 V 'a, � o °� Comments 142nd Ct N - - - - - - - - - Private Road 144th Ct N - - - - - - - - - Private Road 144th PI N - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Private Road 145th Pl N - - - - - - - - - Private Road 146th PI N _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - Private Road 148th Rd N _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Private Road Arrowwood Dr - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - Private Road Banded Raccoon Dr - - - - - - - - - Private Road Bee Line Hwy - - - - - - - - - Private Road Black Bear Rd - - - - - - - - - Private Road Blue Fox PI - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - Private Road Boxwood Dr - - - - - - - - - Private Road Bridgewood Dr - - - - - - - - - Private Road Broken Arrow PI - - - - - - - - - Private Road Broken Wing Ln - - - - - - - - - Private Read Caloosa Blvd - - - - - - - - - Private Road Choctaw Trace - - - - - - - - - Private Road Cocoa Plum Rd - - - - - - - - - Private Road Commercial Cir - - - _ _ _ _ _ - Private Road Crazy Horse Ln - - - - - - - - - Private Road Deer Creek Dr - - - - - - - - - Private Road Fox Croft Ln - - - - - - - - - Private Road Free Spirit Way - - - - - - - - - Private Road Iron Horse Ct - - - - - - - - - Private Read Mallard Creek Dr - - - - - - - - - Private Road Mallard Way - - - - - - - - - Private Road Micosukee Trl - - - - - - - - - Private Road Night Owl Ln - - - - - - - - - Private Road Park of Commerce Blvd - - - _ _ - Private Road III-106 Chapter 3- AREA t Table 6. I'xist1w.- Road Conditions Road Name z,� "n. Comments Peace River Way - - - - - - - - - Private Road Pepper Bush Dr - - - - - - - - - Private Road Pine Borough Ln - - - - - - - - - Private Road Red Fox Dr - - - - - - - - - Private Road Rosewood Ln - - - - - - - - - Private Road Royalwood Dr - - - - - - - - - Private Road Running Water Rd - - - - - - - - - Private Road Sand Ridge Rd - - - - - - - - - Private Road Silver Fox Ln - - - - - - - - - Private Road Sugar Creek Dr - - - - - - - - - Private Road Tomahawk Trl - - - - - - - - - Private Road Twisted Tree Trl - - - - - - - - - Private Road Venture Way - - - - - - - - - Private Road Wilderness Dr - - - - - - - - - Private Road Wind Flower Dr - - - - - - - - - Private Road Wind River Dr - - - - - - - - - Private Road Windover Way - - - - - - - - - Private Road Windsong Way - - - - - - - - - Private Road FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 6 indicates that Area 19 is serviced by Palm Beach County Fire Stations No. 14 & 17. Currently, the average response time is approximately 14.14 minutes. Table 6 also illustrates that the Palm Beach Sheriff s office received 1,043 calls for police service over a one (1) year period. There were also 91 documented crimes in this area over a one (1) year period. 111-107 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 6 indicates that Area 19 is serviced by Palm Beach County Fire Stations No. 14 & 17. Currently, the average response time is approximately 14.14 minutes. Table 6 also illustrates that the Palm Beach Sheriff s office received 1,043 calls for police service over a one (1) year period. There were also 91 documented crimes in this area over a one (1) year period. 111-107 Chapter 3: Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01101/2015 and 12/31/2015. (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDT>[`URES AND REVENUES Table 7 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 19. The total estimated annual revenue is $789,664. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and GIS Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6% franchise fee. Table 8 presents the estimated annual cost of extending City Services and Solid Waste to Area 19. The total estimated cost is approximately $30,291. In addition, it is estimated that $208,738.91 is needed for debris removal expense in the event of a Category 3 hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, it should be considered in the annexation analysis. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Ili-108 Chapter 3: Table 9 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and cost of extending City services to Area 19. Annexation of Area 19 would generate annual revenue of approximately $729,164 for the City. III-109 Chapter 3: AREA 20 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area 20 is in the western portion of the City's limits and is Located on Beeline Highway where PGA Boulevard ends. The area is approximately 1,972 acres in size, and contains the North Palm Beach County General Aviation Airport. Area 20 is bordered on all sides by Palm Beach Gardens parcels zoned Conservation and Planned Development Area. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 below presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 20. The area is currently the North County General Aviation Airport. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's future land use and zoning designations of Area 20 for compatibility and consistency with the City's future land use and zoning criteria. The City should also consider the intergovernmental issues in relationship to the use of the airport. III-110 Chapter 3: b Z!7 Ifi !l►:r-Il [l7►��►i �3�1f1 .1J� 1�■'i-f� li fl I��lifl�;l II K�J The estimated population is provided in Table 2. According to the table, Area 20 does not contain any dwelling units and does not have a future potential to develop in such a manner. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 20 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Table 3 provides data on the availability of water and sewer facilities within Area 20. The area is currently served by Palm. Beach County. Palm Beach County will continue to permanently service Area 20. Palm Beach County CODE ENFORCEMENT The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area 20, and noted that there are no existing code compliance issues or violations, Chapter 3: 1719'IkV P VVIK11 WiDI.Z15114y The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. ROADWAY EXISTING CONDITIONS The North Palm Beach County General Aviation Center has one (1) vehicular access point from Beeline Highway, Aviation Boulevard. The City does not anticipate any jurisdictional transfer of road rights -of -way or maintenance responsibility under this annexation, therefore, roadway improvements cost is not considered in the annual expenses table below. FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 6 indicates that Area 20 is covered by Palm Beach County Fire Station No. 17. Currently, the average response time is approximately 10:48 minutes. Due to the FEC regulations, Fire Rescue is concerned about the access entrance for the Fire Rescue to get to the airport. Table 6 also illustrates that the Palm Beach Sheriffs office received 390 calls for police service over a one (1) year period. There were also 33 documented crimes in this area over a one (1) year period. Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01/01/2015 and 12/13/2015. (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics 111-112 Chapter 3: EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 7 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 20. The total estimated annual revenue is $2,796. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Basle. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and GI5 Divisions. (3) Telecommunication services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6% franchise fee. Table 8 presents estimated annual cost of extending City Services and Solid Waste services to Area 20. The annual cost is estimated to be $5,804 for Area 20. There is also no estimated cost for debris removal in the event of Category 3 hurricane. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Table 9 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and cost of extending City services to Area 20. Annexation of Area 20 would generate a net loss of $3,008 in annual revenue for the City. III-113 Chapter 3: AREA 21 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area is 235.66 acres in size, and has a mix of residential uses along the Intracoastal Waterway and the interior of the area, with a strip of commercial developments fronting on US Highway One (US1). The area is adjacent to the City on the south and east sides, with the eastern edge fronting US1, and the southern edge adjacent to Bomar Street. To the north is unincorporated land, with a waterfront county park, residential neighborhoods, and a large commercial development along US Highway One. The western edge fronts on the Intracoastal Waterway and is composed of waterfront single family homes. Area 2I is located at the northwest comer of the intersection of PGA Boulevard and USI approximately 0.50 miles east of Prosperity Farms Road. LAND USE AND ZONING The current land use of Area 21 is primarily residential along the Intracoastal Waterway and within its interior, with strip commercial uses along US Highway One. Table 1 presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 21. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. II1-114 Chapter 3: At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's future land use and zoning designations of Area 21 for compatibility and consistency with the City's fixture land use and zoning criteria. AREA 21 Area Existing Land Use Future Land Use Zoning Mix of Single High Density, 8 units 1 RH (Multi -Family Interior of area Family and Multi- Acre (HR-8) Residential High Family uses Density Commercial High with CO (General Fronting US Commercial an underlying HR-$ Commercial) (CH-8) Strip along north side RH (Multi -Family of Vista Drive Vacant Conservation (CONS) Residential High Density) On West Side of Single Family Medium Residential 5 RM (Multi -Family Residential Medium Ellison Wilson Road units 1 Acre (MR-5) Density) On West Side of Single Family High Residential 12 RM (Multi -Family Residential Medium Ellison Wilson Road units 1 Acre (HR -12) Density) On West Side of Single Family High Density, 8 units ! RM (Multi -Family Residential Medium Ellison Wilson Road ,acre (HR-8) Density) POPULATION AND NUMBER, OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population is provided in Table 2. Area 21 has a current population of 1,897. This capacity analysis indicates that there are existing facilities on site, and a range of services to meet community needs. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 21 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. 111-115 Chapter 3: WATER AND SEWER Table 3 illustrates that Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA) water and sewer service is available in parts of Area 21. Since water and sewer improvements are not considered in this annexation study, these costs are not considered in the annual expenses table below. if these improvements are to be considered in the future, they could be financed as part of the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. AREA 21 Table 3. Water and Sewer Area Water Sewer Doffer Lane, Vista Drive, Valerie Lane, Holman Dr., Windsor Dr., Juno Gardens In place In place Dr., Juno Road Smith Dr., Seder Lane, Kathy Lane, Dillone Not in place Not in place Lane, Wheeler Road, Len Dr., Ridge Rd. In place for 700 feet; Red Barak Remainder is not in Not in place lace In place on Cove Area west of Ellison Wilson Road In place Lane; Remainder is not in place *13.0 MI.al0 1 The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area 21, and noted numerous existing code compliance issues and violations, which are listed in Table 4. Issues, Violations, and Comments Numerous violations, including; property maintenance standards, outdoor storage, trash, debris, unscreened/improperly screened boats and trailers, abandoned vehicles, illegal structures. - Numerous vacant and boarded tnrornerties; and vacant lots with hia7h P-rass and weeds PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. There is a County owned 3.2-acre parcel of conservation land located on the north side of Vista Drive. In addition, there is a 22-acre {County park immediately north of Juno Road on the Intracoastal Waterway, Just outside the boundaries of Area 21. The County park is well maintained, and includes a boat ramp, two (2) baseball diamonds, a tennis court, a basketball court, a playground, a wooded area, and a parking lot. I11-116 Chapter 3: EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS Table 6 shows the condition of road surfaces, right-of-way width, drainage, curbing, grading, sidewalks, striping, street lighting, and road signage, which were analyzed by staff and assigned letter grades as described in Table 2.2 in Chapter 2. The condition of road surfaces throughout Area 21 are mixed. Most of the road surfaces are satisfactory; however, road receiving a D in either road surface or drainage are in need of major reconstruction. The City does not anticipate any jurisdictional transfer of road rights -of -way or maintenance responsibility under this annexation, therefore, roadway improvements cost is not considered in the annual expenses table below, The City, per Section 62-53 of the Code of Ordinances, cannot assume maintenance responsibility of any public roadway rights -of -way that do not meet the City's roadway standards. Because the roads in this area do not meet current City standards, they would have to be repaired by the current owner or could be improved using the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. AREA 21 Table 6. Road Exislisq, Conditions Road Name cn -� �, "Ci � r mR. .,� ;� `rf� Comments h V Circle Drive B B B D C D B D B Cove B C A D B A D D C Dillone D D D D D D D D D Doffer B C B D B D D D D Highland D D D D D D D D D Holman B B A C C D D D B Speed Bumps .Toy Rene Lane B D A C D D D D D Juno Gardens Drive D D D D D D D D D Mobile Homes (5 empty, 11 in Place) Juno Road B B B B C C B D A Seed Bumps KathyC D C D D D D D D 111-117 Chapter 3: IRMO ao V o tx -,4 U Road Name ri '° °� , i pia Comments V 10 Len C D A D C D D D D North Palm B B A B B D D D B North Suzanne B A A C B D D D D North Waterway B A A D B D D D B Osceola Road B B B D B D D D A Pleasant Drive B B B D B D B D A Speed Bumps Redbank B B A D C D D D D Ride A D A D C D D D D Ridge (Eastern D D C D D D D D D section Service Road C B C D C D B D B One Way Smith D D B D C D D D D Soder D D D D D D D D D South Palm A B A B B D D D B South Suzanne A A A D B D C D B South Waterway B A A D B D C D B Valerie D D D D D D D D I D Vista Drive B A A D B D D D B Vitex C B A D B D D D B Wheeler B D D D C D D D C Seed bumps Windsor C B C D B D D D D Note: (1) Refer to Table 2.2 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 7 illustrates that Area 21 is covered by first responder Palm Beach County Station No. 15. The response time for this area is 6:53. The call and response time data provided below also includes data from Area 22. Fire Rescue has concerns about servicing areas affected by the drawbridge that is over the lntra-Coastal Waterway. Table 7 also illustrates that there were 1,254 calls for police service over a one (1) year period. There were 238 documented crimes over a one (1) year period in this area. III-118 Chapter 3: f 21 RescueEA Table 7. Fire ' Law Enforcement Tire Rescue Law Enforcement(') )First Responder Avg. Response No. of Calls per No.. of Crimes per Station Time 01 Year Year PBC Station No. 15 6:53 (163 calls) (') 1,254 238 Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 0 1/0 1/2015 and 12/31./2015 (2) Includes data from Area 22 (3) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics [EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 21. The estimated annual revenue for Area. 21 is $959,731. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's. Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and GIS Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6% franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City Services and Solid Waste services to the proposed annexation area. The City estimates that $615,509.39 would be needed for debris removal expense in the event of a direct hit from a Category 3 Hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, the City should consider the economic impact of the additional responsibility of debris removal after annexing the area. III-119 Chapter 3 Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and estimated annual cost of extending City services to Area 21. The table shows that the City would potentially gain approximately $853,184 in net annual revenue upon annexation of this Area into the City. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) III-12C Chapter 3: AREA 22 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area 22 consists of a 34-acre strip of land between the Infra -Coastal Waterway on the west and Ellison Wilson road on the east, from PGA Boulevard on the north to McLaren Road on the south. The area is primarily residential, with commercial uses (formally known as Panama Hattie's restaurant and bar, and an office building outparcel) located at the northern end. The residential area is a mix of large and small single-family homes, and a few vacant parcels. There is one (1) single-family parcel on Melody Lane, which is already part of the City that bisects Area 22. Area 22 is located along the west side of Ellison Wilson Road south of PGA Boulevard. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 below presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 22. Area 22 is split by one (1) residential parcel, Melody Lane, which is part of the City. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's future land use and zoning designations of Area 22 for compatibility and consistency with the City's future land use and zoning criteria. III-121 Chapter 3: .EA 22 le 1. Land Use and Zoiii"­ Area Existing Land Use Future Land Use Zoning Commercial area Oust O Commercial (former Commercial High. MUPD (Planned south of PGA l restaurant and bar) and with an underlying Unit office uses HR-12 CH-12 Development South of commercial Single-family homes; High Residential, 12 RM (Multi - Family Medium area vacant units 1 Acre (HR-12) Density) North side of Melody Single-family homes; Low Residential, 3 RM (Multi - Family Medium Lane vacant units f Acre (LR-3) Density) South side of Melody Single-family homes High Residential, 12 RIB[ (Multi - Family Medium Lane units 1 Acre (HR-12) Density) POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population is provided in Table 2. Area 22 has a current population of 112. This capacity analysis indicates that there are existing facilities on site and a range of services to meet community needs. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 22 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Table 3 illustrates that Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA) water is available to parcels in Area 22 that front on Ellison Wilson Road. None of the parcels set back from Ellison Wilson Road have SUA water available. In addition, this entire area is not serviced by SUA sewer services. Since water and sewer improvements are not considered in this annexation study, these costs are not considered in the annual expenses table below. If these improvements are to be considered in the Ilf-122 Chapter 3: future, they could be financed as part of the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. CODE ENFORCEMENT The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area 22, and noted existing code compliance issues and violations in Table 4. I711M 1A 111JAM1]_;IM.01:11 Ca] � The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. EXISTING ROAD CONDITIONS Table 6 shows the condition of road surfaces, right-of-way width, drainage, curbing, grading, sidewalks, striping, street lighting, and road signage, which were analyzed by staff and assigned letter grades as described in Table 2.2 in Chapter 2. This area has a series of short roads leading from Ellison Wilson Road towards the Intracoastal Waterway, and servicing one (I) or more residential properties. Table 6 indicates that road surface conditions are mixed. Ellison Wilson, the north -south collector, is in good condition. Sandy Hill Lane is in poor condition. Two (2) III-123 Chapter 3: streets were not analyzed because they are located within gated communities and are the responsibility of the residents. 'I`he City, per Section 62-53 of the Code of Ordinances, cannot assume maintenance responsibility of any public roadway rights -of -way that do not meet the City's roadway standards. Because the roads in this area do not meet current City standards, they would have to be repaired by the current owner or could be improved using the City's Neighborhood lmprovement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. Table 6. Road Existing Conditions 04 eb Road Name - a Comments Brenda - - - - - - - - - Gated Cruzan Lane B D B D C D D D B Dolphin C D D D D D D A D Ellison Wilson A C A D A A A D A Mocking Bird A D B D B D D D D Rites - - - - - - - - - Gated Sandy Hill D D C D D D D D D Sunny B D B D C D D D B Note: (1) Refer to Table 2.2 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 7 illustrates that Area 22 is covered by Palm Beach County Station 15. The response times and call data for this area where minimal and, therefore, were included in the data for Area 21. Please see Area 21 for more information on the call volume and response times relative to this area. Fire Rescue has concerns about servicing areas affected by the drawbridge that is over the lntra-Coastal Waterway. Table 7 also illustrates that there were 32 calls over a one (1) year period for police service. There were 3 documented crimes over a one (1) year period in this area. 111-124 Chapter 3: Note: (1) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 22. The estimated annual revenue for Area 22 is $152,553. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and GIS Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6% franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City Services and Solid Waste services to Area 22. The City estimates that $31,494.70 would be needed for debris removal expense in the event of a direct hit from a Category 3 Hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, the City should consider the economic impact of the additional responsibility of debris removal after annexing the area. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. lit-125 Chapter 3: Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and estimated annual cost of extending City services to Area 22. The City is expected to show a net gain of approximately $146,336 in annual revenue upon annexation of this area. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) 111-126 Chapter 3: AREA 23 GENERAL DES+CWTION Area 23 is Iocated at the southeastern limits of the City. The 64-acre unincorporated area is mounded by the Hilltop site located in the City to the west, ALT AIA to the north, Northlake Boulevard to the south, and the FEC railroad to the east. The area contains a mix of mobile homes, single and multi -family homes, industrial uses, and some retail uses that front along Northlake Boulevard. This unincorporated area is bounded by the Hilltop site located in the City to the west, ALT A 1 A to the north, Northlake Boulevard to the south, and the FEEL railroad to the east. LAND USE AND ZONING Table I below presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 23. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's land use and zoning designations of Area 23 for compatibility and consistency with the City's land use and zoning criteria. ilf-127 Chapter 3 AREA 23 Existing Land Use Future Land Use Zoning Commercial along Northlake Commercial High, with an CG (Commercial underlying HR-8 (CH-8) General) Hilltop Mobile Home Park and several High Residential, 12 units RH (Multi -Family Residential High single and multi -family properties ! Acre (HR-12) Density) Property along Old Dixie adjacent to Commercial High, with an RH (Multi -Family Residential High FEC tracks underlying MR-5 (CH-5) Density) Prosperity Farms Co Lands West High Residential, 8 units 1 RM (Multi -Family Residential Medium Townsite Acre (HR-8) Density) Vacant Land north of area 23 (Old Industrial (IND) IL (Light Industrial) Dixie Joint Venture Inc.) SUA Water Treatment Plant utilities and Transportation UT PO (Public Ownership) POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population is provided in Table 2. Area 23 has a current a population of 518. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) A Level of Service (LDS) analysis was conducted for Area 23 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER SUA is currently not serving the Residential or Industrial areas along Old Dixie Highway with sanitary sewer. Potable water is currently available to all the residents of Area 23. Since water and sewer improvements are not considered in this annexation study, these costs are not considered in the annual expenses table below. 111-128 Chapter 3: REA 23 le 3. Water and Sewer Area Water Sewer Commercial along Northlake Blvd. In place In place Industrial along Old Dixie Highway In place Not in Place Residential along Old Dixie Highway In place Not in place Mobile Home Parks In place In place CrI1]1 _�L11 i� Dial DQM The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area 23, and noted numerous code compliance issues and violations in Table 4. Issues, Violations, and Comments - Residential properties (trailer park and duplexes) include these common violations: Storage and number of Boats/trailers/commercial vehicleslRV'slmaterials on property, trash/debris on property, exterior maintenance needed (pressure clean/repaint/repair), and landscape overgrown. Commercial properties include these common violations: No dumpster enclosures or dumpster enclosure in disrepair, exterior signage displays, exterior maintenance needed (light fixture damaged, pressure clean/repaint walls/fence in disrepair, outdoor storage. - LandscaDine for vacant Darcels need to be maintained PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITIONS Table 6 indicates the areas where the existing roadways within Area 23 meet or do not meet the City's current roadway LOS. As indicated below, most of the existing roadways are not striped, do not contain street lights, striping, drainage, curbing, and are poorly graded. Roadways in this area which received a D in Road Surface of Drainage do not meet the City's current LOS. The i11-129 Chapter 3: City does not anticipate any jurisdictional transfer of road rights -of -way or maintenance responsibility under this annexation, therefore, roadway improvements cost is not considered in the annual expenses table below. The City, per Section 62-53 of the Code of Ordinances, cannot assume maintenance responsibility of any public roadway rights -of -way that do not meet the City's roadway standards. Because the roads in this area do not meet current City standards, they would have to be repaired by the current owner or could be improved using the City"s Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. AREA 23 Road Conditions Road Name .9 a EF Comments p 0 U U 'ram rn os 95111 Ct B D D D D D D D D Acres C D C D C D D D D Ailey Hilltop B D C D D D D D B Avocado C D B D B D D D B Balsam C A A D A D D D C Banyan B D A D C D D D B Croton B D A D C D D D B Hi Drive D D D D D D D D D High Point C D A D B D D D B Mango Lane C D C D B D D D B Matso C A A D A D D D C Mt Holly B A A D C D A D B Old Dixie B D A D B D A D B Park Lane C D C D C D D D D Plumos C D B D B D D D B Richard Road C D D D C D D D D Tan erime B D A D C_ D D D B (Vote: (1) Refer to Table 2.2 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 7 indicates that Area 23 is covered by Palm Beach County Fire Station No. 68. Currently, the average response time is approximately 5:42 minutes. Table 7 also illustrates that there were 1,367 calls for police service over a one (1) year period. There were also 250 documented crimes in this area over a one (1) year period. IIl-130 Chapter 3: Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 23. The total estimated annual revenue is $129,159. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and G1S Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6% franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City Services and Solid 'Waste services to Area 23. The City estimates that $157,801.57 would be needed for debris removal expense in the event of a direct hit from a Category 3 Hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FENIA, and this expense is not an annual cost, the City should consider the economic impact of the additional responsibility of debris removal after annexing the area. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. III-131 Chapter 3: Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and estimated annual cast of extending City services to Area 23. The City is expected to show a net gain of approximately $97,049 in annual revenue upon annexing this area. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.) III-132 Chapter 3: �V1611 aT.W GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area 24 is located in the southwestern limits of the City's boundary. The site is approximately 1,371 acres, and contains two (2) residential communities, Rustic Lakes and Bay Hill Estates. Area 24 is surrounded by unicorporated Palm Beach County and the City of Palm Beach golf course across Northlake Boulevard to the north. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 below presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 24. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's future land use and zoning designations of Area 24 for compatibility and consistency with the City's future land use and zoning criteria. ill-133 Chapter 3: AREA 24 Table 1. Land Use and Zoning Area Existing Land Use Future Land Use Zoning Commercial Low Office, with AR (Agricultural Rustic Lakes an underlying RR-5 (CL-DIRK- Residential) Residential Single 5); Commercial Low, with an MU (Multiple Family underlying RR-5 (CLIRR-5) & Use e Planned Rural Residential, I unit J 5 District} Acres (RR-5) Bay Hill Estates Residential Single Rural Residential, 1 unit 12.5 RE (Residential Family Acres (RR- 2.5) Estate) N�1�11J��]lL��>1����►111'u�3T�s�+��_�1'.%����lll�� �11*� The estimated population and number of dwelling units is provided in Table 2. Area 24 has a population of 1,146. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 24 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Table 3 illustrates that both water and sewer service currently do not exist throughout all of Area 24. Both Palm Beach County and 'West Palm Beach have the capacity and utilities near these two communities. If these improvements are to be considered in the future, they could be financed as III-134 Chapter 3: part of the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Grant or any other alternative means of financing. CODE ENFORCEMENT The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area 15, and noted only a minimal number of existing code violations, which area listed in Table 4. PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE Area 24 contains one (1) public park that is currently owned and maintained by Palm Beach County. There are also parks, open space, and conservation areas located within the two (2) gated communities, which are maintained by their respective associations. The conservation area within Carleton Oaks is owned by Palm Beach County, and the conservation area within Osprey Isles is owned by the community. These communities are in close proximity to the City Golf Course. 111-135 Chapter 3: E3��i '1'L'��' IT11i�C�I�i� ►�11T1�►�� Both communities located within Area 24, Rustic Lakes and Bay Hill Estates, are gated. The roads are private, and are in good condition. The City does not anticipate any jurisdictional transfer of road rights -of -way or maintenance responsibility under this annexation, therefore, roadway improvements cost is not considered in the annual expenses table below. Note: (1) Refer to Table 2.2 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 7 indicates that Area 24 is serviced by West Palm Beach Fire Station No. 8. Currently, the average response time is approximately 8.55 minutes. It is noted that West Palm Beach Station 8 will continue to service the area until the future Palm Beach Gardens Avenir Station is functional. Table 7 also illustrates that the Palm Beach Sheriff's office received 509 calls for police service over a one (1) year period. There were also 92 documented crimes in this area over a one (1) year period. f I I-136 Chapter 3: Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 24. The total estimated annual revenue is $129,484. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's Building and GIS Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $S 1.'72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the b% franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City Services and Solid Waste services to Area 24. The total estimated annual cost is approximately $75,174. In addition, it is estimated that $157,801.57 is needed for debris removal expense in the event of a Category 3 hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, it should be considered in the annexation analysis. 111-137 Chapter 3: Public Services I Solid Waste I Total 1 $18,264 1 $56,910 1 $75,174 1 Note: ( 1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to deter -nine expenses. Table 14 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and cost of extending City services to Area 24. Annexation of Area 24 would generate approximately $54,31 U in net annual revenue for the City. III-138 Chapter 3: F1 a GENERAL DESCRIPTION Area 25 is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Bee Line Highway and Pratt Whitney road. It is an area referred to as Palm Beach Park of Commerce and is bordered by single family residential on the east and south and vacant County owned land on the north and west. Area 25 is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Bee Line Highway and Pratt Whitney Road. LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 below presents the land use and zoning designations of Area 25. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. At the time of annexation, the City should review and assess the County's future land use and zoning designations of Area 25 for compatibility and consistency with the City's future land use and zoning criteria. 111-139 Chapter 3: POPULATION AND NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS The estimated population and number of dwelling units is provided in Table 2. Area 25 is currently industrial in nature and has a population of zero. Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) STANDARDS A Level of Service (LOS) analysis was conducted for Area 25 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that the estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Table 3 illustrates that both water and sewer service currently exist throughout all of Area 25. The Seacoast Utility Authority is providing both water and sewer through a bulk service agreement with Palm Beach County. III-144 Chapter 3: Coll] 0-Do Dial �r1:ll)-3u 10401 The City's Code Enforcement Division assessed the impacts associated with Area 25, and noted only a minimal number of existing code violations, which area listed in Table 4. PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE It does not appear that Area 25 has any recreational amenities. However, there may be designated natural areas, but further analysis of each parcel would need to be conducted to determine this. ROADWAY EXISTING CONDITIONS The Palm Beach Park of Commerce is a North Palm Beach County Unit of Development (Unit 16). Northern Palm. Beach County Improvement District owns and maintains all roads and surface water management systems for this area No roadway jurisdiction transfer is being proposed for this area. III-141 Chapter 3: FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT Table 7 indicates that Area 25 is serviced by Palm Beach County Fire Station No. 14. Currently, the average response time is approximately 12:22 minutes. Table 7 also illustrates that the Palm Beach Sheriff's office received 1,272 calls for police service over a one (1) year period. There were also 74 documented crimes in this area over a one (1) year period. Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 0I/0I/20I5 and 12/31/2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 25. The total estimated annual revenue is $483,867. Ill-142 Chapter 3: Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from the City's G1S Division. The County estimates a Business Tax Receipt compliance rate of approximately 30 percent; therefore, the anticipated income to the City upon annexation may be higher. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400 (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the +6% franchise fee Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending City Services and Solid Waste services to Area 25. The total estimated annual cost is approximately $4,431. In addition, it is estimated that $0.00 is needed for debris removal expense in the event of a Category 3 hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, it should be considered in the annexation analysis. ]Vote: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Table 10 shows a summary of the estimated annual revenues and cost of extending City services to Area 25. Annexation of Area 25 would generate approximately $479,436 in net annual revenue for the City. 111-143 Chapter 3: AREA 26 GENERAL DESCRIPTION This unincorporated area is 191 acres and is bounded by conservation lands on the north, conservation lands and single family subdivision on the east, the Intra-Coastal Waterway on the West and the City of Juno Beach on the South. Area 26 is composed primarily of Frenchman's Harbor, Bert Winters Park, vacant land and single family residential neighborhoods. Area 26 is bordered by conservation lands on the north and east and the Intra-Coastal Waterway on the West LAND USE AND ZONING Table 1 presents the land use and zoning of Area 26. At the time of annexation., the City should review and assess the County's land use and zoning of Area 26 for compatibility and consistency with the City's land use and zoning criteria. Maps showing the County's future land use and zoning designations are included in Appendices B and C, respectively. 111-144 Chapter 3: Table 1. Land L�se anti Zoning Area Existing Land Future Laud Zonis 1; Use Use Frenchman's Harbor Residential Medium Residential, PUD (Planned Unit 5 units 1 Acre (MR-5) Development) Bert Winters Park Recreational Institutional (INST), PO (Public Recreation RE+C Ownership) Medium Residential, Juno Isles No. 1 unrecorded Residential 5 units f Acre (MR-5) RS (Residential Single and Low Residential, Family) 3 units / Acre (LR-3) 111012 OJ l► W1]ZFMl I1KIIJUVI t _DIA"XIT 11IW;,1 DI ftaI110.Y K The estimated population and number of dwelling units at build -out are provided in Table 2. According to the table, Area 26 has a 2015 population of 438 and 247 dwelling units. This capacity analysis indicates that there are existing facilities on site and a range of services are currently being provided by the County. Estimated Existing Number of Dwelling Population (2015) Size (acres) Units (2015) 438 191.34 207 Source: 2015 University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 2016. EXISTING CONDITIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) An analysis was conducted for Area 26 using data provided to the Planning and Zoning Department by the applicable department or agency for each service. It is important to note that estimates provided are not final. Actual revenues, costs, and personnel needs will need to be determined at the time of annexation. WATER AND SEWER Table 3 illustrates that Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA) provides water service to all but Frenchman's Harbor which is serviced by the Town of Jupiter. SUA provides sewer service for Bert Winters Park and it is available for the unrecorded subdivision to the south. 111-145 Chapter 3: AREA26 Table Area Water Sewer Comments Frenchman's Harbor In Place In Place Town of]upiterlEncon Bert Winters Park In Place In Place Seacoast Utility Authority Not in Juno Isles No. 1 unrecorded In Place Place Seacoast utility Authority CODE ENFORCEMENT Table 4 reflects the findings the City's code enforcement assessment of Area 26. Area 26 contains moderate code violations. PARKS LEVEL OF SERVICE The area is in driving distance of various public parks maintained by the City and other agencies. (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank) 111-146 Chapter 3: EXISTING ROADWAY CONDITION Table 6 shows the condition of road surfaces, right-of-way width, drainage, curbing, grading, sidewalks, striping, street lighting, and road signage, which were analyzed by Staff' and assigned letter grades as described in Table 2.2 in Chapter 2. Most of the road surfaces meet or exceed the City's current LOS. The City, per Section 62-53 of the Code of Ordinances, cannot assume maintenance responsibility of any public roadway rights -of -way that do not meet the City's roadway standards. Because the roads in this area do not meet current City standards, they would have to be repaired by the current owner or could be unproved using the City's Neighborhood Improvement Assessment Program, the Community Development Block Chant or any other alternative means of financing. Table 6. Existing Road Conditions Road Name Ix .0 �n Comments A a { 4 cn y b ca a Ardley Court B A A D A A A A A Ardley Road B A A D A A A A A Ascott Circle B A A D A A A A A Ascott Road B A A D A A A A A Bay Cliff Drive - - - - - - - - - Gated Chester Bay Lane - - - - - - - - - Gated Randnor Court B A A D A A A A A Randnor Road B A A D A A A A A Rolling Green Road B B C C D D C D B Willow Cay - - - - - - - - - Gated Note: (1) Refer to Table 2.2 FIRE RESCUE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT IBM% Chapter 3: Table 7 illustrates the current fire rescue and law enforcement service to Area 26. This area is covered by Palm Beach County Fire Station 15. The average response time for this area is 6:35 minutes. Fire Rescue has concerns about servicing areas affected by the drawbridge that is over the lntra-Coastal Waterway. Table 7 also illustrates that the Palm Beach Sheriff's office received 241 calls for police service over a one (1) year period. There were 33 documented crimes in this area over a one (1) year period. Additional staff needs necessary to provide service to Area 26 is discussed in Chapter 5. Note: (1) Fire Rescue average response time and number of calls measured between 01/01/2015 and 12/31/2015 (2) 2015 Calls for Service and Crime Statistics EXPENDITURES AND REVENUES Table 8 summarizes the estimated annual revenues of Area 26. The total estimated annual revenue is $930,537. Note: (1) 2010 Property Appraiser's Data Base. (2) Data provided by Palm Beach County in conjunction with information obtained from. the City's Building and GIS Divisions. (3) Telecommunication Services Tax was calculated by assuming an annual bill of $2,400. (4) Solid Waste Franchise Fee was calculated by using the Waste Management fee ($105 for single family parcels and $81.72 for multi -family and mobile home parcels) and multiplying by the 5% franchise fee. (5) Electric Franchise Fee was calculated by assuming an annual electric bill of $2,400 and multiplying by the 6% franchise fee. Table 9 presents estimated annual cost of extending Public Services and Solid Waste services to Area 26. From the table below, a total of $30,175 may be spent annually by the City to maintain the grounds and solid waste service for Area 26. The City estimates that $133,430.67 would be needed for debris removal expense in the event of a direct hit from a Category 3 Hurricane. Although the City pursues reimbursement from FEMA, and this expense is not an annual cost, the 111-148 Chapter 3: City should consider the economic impact of the additional responsibility of debris removal after annexing the area. Note: (1) Refer to Chapter 2, Methodology, for calculations used to determine expenses. Table 10 summarizes the annual cost and revenue of extending City services to Area 26. The table shows that the City could potentially gain approximately $900,362 in annual revenue upon annexation. Total Revenue I Potential Expenses N Net Revenue $930,537 1 $30,175 1 $900,362 {The remainder of this page left intentionally blank.} 111-149 CHAPTER 4 CGNCLUSI©N SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Based on the revenue and expenditure data presented in Chapter 3, Table 4.1 represents an overview of the net revenue projected for each proposed annexation area. In terms of net revenue, the proposed annexation areas that have the heighest potential revenue generation are Areas 2, 6, and 7, all with greater than $2 million in annual net revenue. Table 4.1 Summary of Annual Revenues and Expenditures Area Acres Revenues en ditmm(Q Net Revenue 1 283 $650,233 $151,603 $498,630 2 602 $3,088,694 $174,209 $2,914,485 3 39 $79,609 $8,420 $71,189 4 32 $65, 386 $10,743 $54,643 5 31 $161,194 $9,655 $151,539 6 848 $10,326,543 $86,831 $10,239,712 7 1,175 $2,508,559 $1.31,625 $2,376,934 8 332 $547,626 $36,396 $511,230 9 93 $199,378 $45,339 $154,039 10 250 $560,881 $53,183 $507,698 11 40 $104,179 $25,268 $78,911 12 129 $445,825 $67,048 $378,777 13 35 $6,393 $1,313 $5,080 14 107 $419,330 $62,725 $356,605 15 284 $359,130 $28,075 $331,055 16 94 $22,844 $10,185 $12,659 17 63 $2,302 $o $2,302 18 4,185 $0 $1,814 ($1,814) 19 2,807 $789,664 $60,500 $729,164 20 1,972 $2,796 $5,804 ($3,008) 21 236 $959,731 $106,547 $853,184 22 34 $152,553 $6,217 $146,336 23 64 $129,159 $32,110 $97,049 24 1,371 $129,484 $75,174 $54, 310 25 1,209 1 $483,86 7 $4,431 $479,436 26 191 1 $930,537 $30,175 $900,362 Note: (1) Figure includes expenditure costs as depicted in Chapter 3. Human Resource costs are not included. Chapter 4 POLICY FOR METHOD OF ANNEXATION In order to ensure that the proposed annexation areas are incorporated in an efficient and beneficial manner, the following method of annexation is proposed. 1. Promote voluntary annexation whenever feasible. 2. Promote the use of annexations through interlocal agreement per F.S. 171.046 3. Address involuntary requests for annexation through community coordination and interdepartmental coordinated review. ST& F."t a w DW11] ANNEXATION AREAS OF INTEREST STUDY MAP 19 �. 'BLV VffN W O ti 26 7 c HOOD RD `" `Z - " 2 Y 1� ' T J BURNS F 'HOLE.Y DR r Z - � LIGI- 7 OUSE D4 14 11 12 23 t ti- 8 10 OF v -�- i`s �..31� _ .�,.,.'.M• fir;"" ij 7 i� t'._:. � �� �yK r a r ra11 ■ a ANNEXATION STUDY 1 _ 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 N Potential Annexation Areas Map 2 5 8 _ 11 - 14 17 - 20 - 23 26 - 3 - 6 9 12 _ 15 = 18 21 - 24 MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY Feet 0 2,500 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning FUTURE LAND USE MAPS BY STUDY AREA GULL R EVER LIAD—El DUNES R ,a r CTALINA F ANNEXATION STUDY Area 1 - FLUM �R le LU _ �r LONE PINE RDl r_,*CAFRIRD f yfir*r r i BERMUDA RD & •fit= IU , ` OAK DR J �a •� _ } -�� .�� pR_ � .-=r � \•_ ram' � ,ATIIINTIC�RD _ .�►5'-� �_ . �' � �" �� - = ,�o _ VV EDGEWATER DR MMMM Feet 0 250 500 1.000 1,500 2.000 FUTURE LAND USE LR-3 CH/5 MR-5 INST Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ORS,; is FLAMINGO TER' T - ° tML #eN g'� i+M it�[ ra ' 23RD+VEN �r c;ir�+� St�rtli¢.�+eC'�WAtERp Rom■- !: SSHOREDR� i- izI �.. } Z ++! j �j J ►' �t .COCONUT RD y �i�ryv pp y (j f ;54 e- • � S/7 O� O � Z' A � W � Z „Q! , x ? W d _r • .90 i C9 d• INSHORE OR ' b. O w} Y 'r 3 Jt L. K Ds J o� .�, Q $ i" r ¢*.,,. _ ¢� a r , • y0 > o Q ,..K 1'!eJ` �L .Q J &1. a •.Y a a +A`•_ty -.y; '� _ p" Z a OSPERI71' FARMS RD V �l : c . t 1, ,r • �y �; ,? o A YYae r.at , l[ N a +� titsst,V — jMONACO-TER- :Ii� .r• ,.� �•�� � i� Jy�G}'.i�Z _ •v aoRt3; :W O 1 CALAIS CIRA M ANNEXATION STUDY Area 2 - FLUM Feet 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 FUTURE LAND USE _ LR-3 4, f IND MR-5 LR-2 NA Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG•Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 3 - FLUM Feet 0 85 170 340 510 680 FUTURE LAND USE LR-2 Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 4 - FLUM .S ! 1 pia 112TH CT N z _ O � -* W�A Via. - N MOPPET CIR qw + w " ` S MONET CIR W M�M� Feet 0 80 160 320 480 640 FUTURE LAND USE HR-12 LR-1 Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning 11► ANNEXATION STUDY Area 5 - FLUM fT 0LL I i 1 `4 I :.. 2 ' L) a d - ~ r A4ERY RD s KIDD p i - aer � PALM TREE LN - MMMM _ Feet 0 112.5 225 450 675 900 FUTURE LAND USE LDR (city) LR-3 Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning F ANNEXATION STUDY Area 6 - FLUM SE AVVAJRD I N 0,., 10 dr IP Ito re to dfi 4 + 7 A4 00 00 L > v 0 lb _0 E MMMM i Feet 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 FUTURE LAND USE LR-1 M CH18 LR-2 INST LR-3 Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 7 - FLUM MMMM Feet 0 650 1,300 2,600 3,900 5,200 FUTURE LAND USE M LR-3 LR-1 UT LR-2 Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning 1 k? ANNEXATION STUDY Area 8 - FLUM -,� us N VIRGINIAAVE f I ! / •• N . l Via , . S VIRGINIA AVE' . f N BATES RD ... _ IDS BATES RC %- - N ELIZABETH AVE t S LIZABETH_AVE r ` r -t- iIZ�L Y �Y • C �zN M_, �.' Nr o I 0 315 630 " �l M Feet 1,260 1,890 2,520 FUTURE LAND USE LR-1 CL/1 RL (city) Created September 26, 2D16 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning a Awwk r Ok R �:- i L ul - - � 7�° for ► � � IV 40 Jr ; � �` N z s FOUR SEASONS ST i� 1 w i IL �,�.,- ANNEXATION STUDY Area 9-FLUM a i" 7 A�—► 5 FOUR SEASONS ST ' l M�M� Feet 0 125 250 500 750 1,000 FUTURE LAND USE INST HR-8 UT Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 10 - FLUM ;;;BUR MA RD I URANUS TER' j m gip.. 46 ¢CRATER TER - t -an � �.,..:� CUR ' •_�" 7� � �- x,� !c' .Nor U PLUTO TER '{ Q PL SATELLITE TER co t z Z O .y Q, x ai ra a' M�=l Feet 0 230 460 920 1,380 1,840 FUTURE LAND USE HR-12 M LR-3 CH HR-8 MR-5 CH/8 ' IND UT Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning jr, A I vow' 46, 7.0 d ANNEXATION STUDY Area 12 - FLUM z h � UNKWN� SILVERTHORNE DR w' A-1 SUN�CT' .F l K ", ` �7 7 1 - � � 'd L' i DRY. _ '�'9`4 •p r,:� - - - P ,.; _ ;,;off .. uJ ,, r -i -'" o�`�Z . ul lit Feet 0 195 390 780 1,170 1,560 FUTURE LAND USE HR-12 INST C (city) HR-8 MR-5 CH/8 Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning 4 ANNEXATION STUDY Area 13 - FLUM ^Al� MMMMFeet 0 85 170 340 510 680 .r I FUTURE LAND USE INSTl8 LR-1 Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 14 - FLUM Bk2+4DY LN ' w naz a �r 0O ZQ W d Cflz 7J = nay MMMM Feet 0 195 390 780 1,170 1,560 FUTURE LAND USE HR-8 LR-1 CH/8 INST MR-5 HR-12 Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG.Planning 3 Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 15 - FLUM '7 �.k,. fft Feet 300 600 1,200 1,800 2,400 FUTURE LAND USE INST C L-O/8 LR-1 CON Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG•Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 16 - FLUM Feet 155 310 620 930 1,240 FUTURE LAND USE RR-10 Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning C It ANNEXATION STUDY FUTURE LAND USE Area 17 - F L U M RR-20 Feet Created September 26, 2016 0 130 260 520 780 1,040 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 18 - FLUM �MMM W 0 875 1,750 3,500 5,250 �Y = Feet 7,000 FUTURE LAND USE CON RR-10 Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 19 - FLUM MMMM Feet 0 1.250 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 Y FUTURE LAND USE IND CON RR-10 Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning 3 Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 20 - FLUM FUTURE LAND USE Rig-10 UT Feet Created September 26, 20i6 0 700 1,400 2,800 4,200 5,600 Source: PBG-Planning B Zoning a i I _ sj. P At `-.-_ �. f sir if ' , _-•� � � � , Vie A -,Ix - ; - — . I I& .., r 1` i7. —j K a p. LL � 7 Z S � � � O c s sue, _ g y Sri A ELLISON WIISON!RD' ANNEXATION STUDY Area 21 - FLUM _ ---•sue w ;.j L fit g,., " Feet 0 195 390 780 1,170 1,560 FUTURE LAND USE CH/8 CON MR-5 CHXl8 HR-12 PARK HR-8 Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning FA a Q z - a , r z Z J p' _ O r LU to r t: ' tf� is evilPk - ANNEXATION STUDY Area 22 - FLUM Feet 0 85 170 340 510 680 FUTURE LAND USE HR-12 CH112 LR-3 Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG.Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 23 - FLUM PP- Aj o WI DR' """1• 9ra fri _ _ ACRES WAY MMMM Feet 0 190 380 760 1,140 1,520 44 f , FUTURE LAND USE CH/5 CH/8 HR-12 M IND HR-8 UT Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning zARBOR CREST WA MAYWOOD CREST R uu " z t— w 0 z Z. ,' 112TH TEFL' !" p 4 I w a _ .• a_3 Q Ix — W W 2 � — oo 4 - 41 g' h BAY HILL DR,t STONEHAVEN'4'VAY 10 g>r� � C� w ED) GV100 Z 4 n 12DT-H AVE NJ ANNEXATION STUDY FUTURE LAND USE CL/RR-5 RR-2.5 Area 24 - FLUM CL-0i8 LR-1 RR-5 CL-OIR R-5 RR-10 Feet Created September zs, zole 0 600 1,200 2,400 3,600 4,800 Source: PBG-Planning 8 Zoning W ANNEXATION STUDY Area 25 - FLUM 0 625 1,250 2,500 � x IZ0 s Feet 3,750 5,000 FUTURE LAND USE IND Created September 26, 2016 Source: PSG -Planning & Zoning L_ t J ANNEXATION STUDY Area 26 - FLUM Z rr Qq `` 14 Art FUTURE LAND USE LR-3 OPF (city) INST MR-5 PARK Feet 0 Created September 26, 2016 240 480 960 1,440 1,920 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning APPENDIX C: ZONING DISTRICT MAPS w n GiJLI RD - 4 FLORIDA BLVD :zgi 't' Lu EVERGLADES RD C w d a DUNES RD G 9 < z CATALINA RD =�'t Av'r BAHAMA RD 'Mill" ro,� r k: Ol - for+�frf F 1 *_ CCAAPRI RD PINf - x BERMUDA R[ - -' � ;-elf-.�.,::.._�i! r � � 'llt�i•a�J'a . >Iii � :.�F� ANNEXATION STUDY Area 1 -ZONING 0 250 500 GROVE+RD - � - .�� r w PINE RD s)lIw �x 4� r ► '' Z W • 'a ` '- OAK DR V _ W EDGEWATEF' Feet 1,000 1,500 2,000 ZONING COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning }54 QF-=LAMINGO TER GRO'jrc 23RDAVE N - ," - w �' t • • # • ' S SHORE DR] 7 ,: ,i' ,COCONUT A jr 4 0 r`� 1 �ir'lli i• a gti(u s a siaQO( '• , �' fly r te�- 1L5+ > "OyO Pw ? Zn:r< ; Q INSHORE DR ow 4ea 3T 1n4�f-r Irer. 4t 1 , q;-iy �u Ci K-S 5dt,.�- U~..... e.�.� 'y�r.. ► F1. _ �•Y � Z PROSPERITY FARMS Rw Ol wO [ r } L fT t ti r. ?MONACO-TER S. E + 4•11 A n HOC' .1 S w� z = t: U jr- � a CALAIS CIR' ANNEXATION STUDY Area 2 - ZONING MMMMFeet 0 500 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 EDGEt4Ar �tw r TER .;•7� . r l to ,�� Ir# ❑ a* w cr i. w W Q i w �,. . IY �} ❑ ❑ Z w m .. �.,., O ZONING ® INDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning Q { o o ' I �� O 4 tk IV- ANNEXATION STUDY ZONING Area 3 - ZONING RESIDENTIAL Feet Created September 26, 2016 0 85 170 340 510 680 Source: PBG-Planning s Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 4 - ZONING oil J r 1 - S 112TH CT N MAN MONETM fir Lu _ k �� • 1y��a J •s O W.y O. S MONET CIR E=L _ Z s- J Lu Feet 0 80 160 320 480 640 ZONING PUBLIC OWNERSHIP RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning y r E,TEACH RD IW „ AVERY RQ KIDD LN' ANNEXATION STUDY Area 5 - ZONING W*F I Nx . A W TEACH RD,, o �. PALM TREELN m�m� Feet 0 112.5 225 450 675 900 ZONING RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 6 - ZONING jell�' � . J� �•�g . ��:'. w T► y TURTLE, ,r ��. � — � � _.,!'...a," s� I ja To Z .` a # rnf, fit Y Uu rrJ 4 j S ANY I> " `: r •�, { .* W J° G F.Hays cc� '^ ' a aA= ,. "•� + "c 9y. R, • � h ' l� jaw •' - }` ti ;,`= •$. T_r 't� Dh'F { •l�,-Ilk . ��. jaekPlrcK18U - ' .,SEAWARDDRW '- C Ir s. " l --7%7 OS,1 il?EE wA' +t aRrt MI �►4�' `r - " "� �'US f p yWENQ ,� s�; 1 -- ti(y ch'. All } CApr Alys�NDC' Ya �LAiCESHflREDR�PKE'SHORPL R i � WIMM A.L.ANDIN6 PjA a mmmm Feet 0 500 1.000 2,000 3,000 4.000 ZONING COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 7 - ZONING LJ _ z Zy w . w. # S 0G �'LA� , c _ � f JOZ• Asti � , 'Sy �� � �`�� �, m z r. o owe Pao v� i Q < 0 Q TOUCHSTONE CIR z Ah.1MOCK kING OlD�ygRSli Rp J o ¢ v� < G z p - - m HOOD RD w MMMM Feet 0 650 1,300 2,600 3,900 5,200 ZONING RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 8 - ZONING ,�. •` N BATE F F;D 1 � I' `�• � a - `r N ELIZABETH AVE _ ' y� F- =Ir r v 0 315 630 f _3 v *En - 7- T— �lir • z �Ty �. 45TH WAY N z S VIRGINIAAVE ` (� ') < Z mj *:SBATES RDr_� ; ft I S ELIZABETH AVE :a "1 {{ n t' 'z $ Feet 1,260 1,890 2,520 ZONING COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG.Planning & Zoning CT, MAO., 4W...r,: it -IL �� a �\ ~- ~ > • ♦ ' 1 i - N -F�Fl1MUMQIMM J PALM BEACH o ` � �BURMA RDY /A, O SOL TER z BURhAACIR �D m , uj ' r O URANUS TER = LYNDALL LN r- #. 1 - m AW elm ry 44�� G¢RATERTER & �.� 40 _ 0 ,iMrbra.IW = - Z, . � j SATELLITE TERIr ANNEXATION STUDY Area 10 - ZONING Feet 0 230 460 920 1,380 1,840 s�el 44 ZONING INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL G Created September 26. 2016 Source: PSG -Planning & Zoning Z<� ;wow AM InT PALM BEACH ANNEXATION STUDY Area 13 - ZONING s� P A i4 3y� Feet 0 85 170 340 510 680 ZONING PUBLIC OWNERSHIP RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning S Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 14 - ZONING 0 195 390 780 11 2 Feet 1,170 1,560 ZONING COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 15 - ZONING - ,1 M r� MEMORIAL PARK ddDR MT SINAI DR ilk ko Feet 0 300 600 1,200 1,800 2,400 ZONING COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG•Planning 3 Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 16 - ZONING �MMMM 155 310 Feet 620 930 1,240 ZONING RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 17 - ZONING 1 1 M�M� M 0 130 260 520 w � 0 Feet 780 1,040 ZONING RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning z z z z z z r4 X sn N ❑ ,- N � � N N Q z z i z z z rrn HALL t r n co S $1 V[} F 2 Z r N Ca � y F r N Z 0 ❑ C) i N V Z Z ro N z z z z x' d ? a z '- - d -Z z " z m z a z d J 2 2 2 S h S a)p d Z a Z L7 p O = C ci rWi ��-, P Y O d p �. m F--- c0 0 2 0 r N' APgCF}�r$L�O z ¢ 4 Z J ix r z d z x N ANNEXATION STUDY Area 18 - ZONING IpgYd 0 , c r SEMINOLE PRATT V%eHITNEY RD Feet 0 875 1,750 3,500 5,250 7,000 ZONING PUBLIC OWNERSHIP RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION rUDY Area 19 - ZONING z148TN RP N - > O Q rn ®�cF - o . o " : Z. 2 .. w 146TH PL N m MF AQ - �i x r+ X . - - o . --- � C ---~ m j - w z w . . - yam•, yQ . r— - a �. j 144THCTN q 144TH ', e - F 142NP CT N z a ¢ FREE SPIRIT WAY'' O -LU w - Q a L` 1407H ST N U OU fi . OG C R, �� 7 - � U., C I yY©O as =�_M _ Feet 0 1,250 2,500 5,000 7,500 10,000 ZONING MINDUSTRIAL PUBLIC OWNERSHIP RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 20 - ZONING V �I ti I I'll 91 ! t.t tie�La t_ Feet 0 700 1,400 2,800 4,200 5,600 ZONING PUBLIC OWNERSHIP Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning IF tv Q ELLISON WILSO NRDa r . - - .----+�---�,.��,. - � -ram-�—r-+�e�•- ANNEXATION STUDY Area 21 -ZONING W IY i . Z {t: W At r J `r'7j�fl, � l � � J • _ -ems r! ;' 1 R O pir p J r• W LL e W 1w 0 Lu J Q LU }} lot Feet 0 195 390 780 1 170 1,560 ZONING COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ' 4 _1 z J 40. J J_ P F ANNEXATION STUDY Area 22 - ZONING Feet 0 85 170 340 510 680 L u s 00 -• X ZONING RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 23 - ZONING �s BALSAM DF ,.,�i- HI DRy, h ; t. M4TqnnR �mmm Feet 0 190 380 760 1,140 1,520 ZONING COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL PUBLIC OWNERSHIP RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning o O _ w ARBOR CREST WAY h:7P,Y11' Op CREST DR' LU � i0 sum Z. _fr z.'.' _ Z -. W W - Z a a- se` ` 112TH� = w w Y. x F ! C co I- r. W a Ccc CID liff _ O - Z ` - ' _ BAY HILL DR y Ps }> IG- :t ytc � N > c� �.V \ ; &•?� rj DSMUIR D f: '� to r-° ,'• WOO R t' r 0, �G ,'3 AA ', ""N +7 `4�' i it N - a L 41 'l< W a rJ� - - - 120TH A'•✓F ANNEXATION STUDY Area 24 - ZONING Feet 0 600 1,200 2,400 3,600 4,800 ZONING COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ANNEXATION STUDY Area 25 - ZONING ASSEMBLY v o w T J L V ? i w CORP)RATE RD _ ¢ . . Lu LU r . O - p. w O CORPORATERD S Feet 0 625 1,250 2,500 3,750 5,000 ZONING - INDUSTRIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning ¢gpY 4N � I � �, -- • C f� " 1 s� Y- 1 r,• ANNEXATION STUDY Area 26 - ZONING Feet 0 240 480 960 1,440 1,920 MirIr "�° •R'•.'t foot w a go AN Ae, ZONING PUBLIC OWNERSHIP RESIDENTIAL Created September 26, 2016 Source: PBG-Planning & Zoning CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS COUNCIL AGENDA Friday, January 6, 2017 6:00 P.M. Mayor Tinsley Vice Mayor Jablin Councilmember Premuroso Councilmember Marino Councilmember Woods I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. ROLL CALL III. RESOLUTIONS: a. RESOLUTION 12, 2017 — INFRASTRUCTURE ONE -CENT SALES TAX O�.X.eA- L PROPOSAL. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM SD BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA; ADOPTING A FORMAL POLICY AND PLAN FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF THE ONE -CENT INFRASTRUCTURE SALES SURTAX; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. b. RESOLUTION 13, 2017 — FUTURE ANNEXATION PROPOSAL. A �pzxl RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA ACCEPTING THE "ANNEXATION AREAS OF INTEREST 5"d STUDY" FOR FUTURE ANNEXATION AREAS; DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO CONTINUE WITH THE "ANNEXATION AREAS OF INTEREST STUDY" AS POLICY GUIDANCE FOR THE ANNEXATION INITIATIVE, CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 171, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. IV. ITEMS FOR COUNCIL ACTION/DISCUSSION: V. ADJOURNMENT PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any interested party wishes to appeal any decision made by the City Council with respect to any matter considered at this public hearing, such interested parties will need a record of the proceedings and may need to ensure that a verbatim record is made, including the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 286 26, Florida Statutes, persons with disabilities needing special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding are entitled to the provision of certain assistance at no cost. Please call the City Clerk's Office at 561-799-4122 no later than five (5) days prior to the hearing if this assistance is required. For hearing impaired assistance, please call the Florida Relay Service Numbers: 800-955-8771 (TDD) or 800-955-8770 (VOICE). NOTE: All presentation materials must be received by the City Clerk prior to the presentation to the Council. (9 r WD . d � CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS COUNCIL AGENDA Friday, January 6, 2017 6:00 P.M. Mayor Tinsley Vice Mayor Jablin Councilmember Premuroso Councilmember Marino Councilmember Woods I. ✓ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. "ROLL CALL III. ,/RESOLUTIONS: a. RESOLUTION 12, 2017 — INFRASTRUCTURE ONE -CENT SALES TAX PROPOSAL. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA; ADOPTING A FORMAL POLICY AND PLAN FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF THE ONE -CENT INFRASTRUCTURE SALES SURTAX; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. b. RESOLUTION 13, 2017 — FUTURE ANNEXATION PROPOSAL. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA ACCEPTING THE "ANNEXATION AREAS OF INTEREST STUDY' FOR FUTURE ANNEXATION AREAS; DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO CONTINUE WITH THE "ANNEXATION AREAS OF INTEREST STUDY" AS POLICY GUIDANCE FOR THE ANNEXATION INITIATIVE, CONSISTENT WITH CHAPTER 171, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES. IV. V/ ITEMS FOR COUNCIL ACTION/DISCUSSION: V. ADJOURNMENT PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any interested party wishes to appeal any decision made by the City Council with respect to any matter considered at this public hearing, such interested parties will need a record of the proceedings and may need to ensure that a verbatim record is made, including the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 286.26, Florida Statutes, persons with disabilities needing special accommodations in order to participate in this proceeding are entitled to the provision of certain assistance at no cost. Please call the City Clerk's Office at 561-799-4122 no later than five (5) days prior to the hearing if this assistance is required. For hearing impaired assistance, please call the Florida Relay Service Numbers: 800-955-8771 (TDD) or 800-955-8770 (VOICE). NOTE: All presentation materials must be received by the City Clerk prior to the presentation to the Council. -(a-�-7 e�►u�.� �� (�c&--e �Y sam Q-�aU�Q, ;ram d, LQ� ,��, o f "', ,rum Pa I a" C", QA 1� 1 F }�c,.�e,� ,moo-�ws; -TO TMKc- r 5 (r Qv B cat Cv7 r me`.�p T 7i �^2 -Ta At.?— y-1 c 04 IC¢J TD pvT i^^y 0`^ Co v N UL S t Lost Tree Village Property Owners Association 11237 Lost Tree Way • North Palm Beach, Florida 33408 Tel 561-622-7047 • Fax 561-627-4139 January 6, 2017 Marcie Tinsley Mayor Palm F3each Gardens 10500 Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Dear Mayor1,:sley: On behalf of all the residents of Lost Tree Village, we wanted to bring to your attention our "opposition" to any possible annexation of our Village by the city of Palm Beach Gardens. it was recently brought to our attention that the City of Palm Beach Gardens has annexation as a priority on their agenda, and we are opposed to any such action. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Alison M. Peters, LCAM Village Manager On Behalf of Lost Tree Village POA Board of Governors Cc: LTV Board of Governors -,t ,vow ��-�o�k LmAAA f �.aR u - cer r. Fly k (`r-�r ; •=� �1R- aA� "t44-'N8. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC . P-S REQUEST TO ADDRESS CITY COUNCIL PLEASE PRINT NANIE: 7-�rk�A Wv SUBJECT: 04- W�44va Ai ITEM ON THE AGENDA: YES: " NO: Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public' and "Public Hearings" portions of the agenda. This request to address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the item. Each speaker will be given three (3) minutes and is limited to one (1) comment card per Agenda Item. Separate comment cards must be filled out for each specific Agenda Item about which you wish to speak.