HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z 081401CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
August 14, 2001
MINUTES
The Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Palm Beach Gardens,
Florida, was called to order by Chair Dennis Solomon at 6:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the
Municipal Complex, 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and opened with the
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
CITY COUNCIL LIAISON
There were no items by the City Council Liaison.
REPORT BY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR
Growth Management Director Charles Wu reported that City Council approvals granted at their August
2, 2001 meeting included Frenchman's Reserve Pods "F" and "D" with additional landscaping; Mirasol
Parcel 8; elimination of time extension for Hidden Hollow, Mirasol PCD amendment, and future land
• use change small scale amendment at the southwest corner of Northlake and Congress Avenue. The City
Council postponed indefinitely changes in uses for the Regional Center DRI.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mr. Ansay made a motion to approve the July 24, 2001 meeting minutes as submitted. Mr. Volante
seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 7 -0 vote.
ROLL CALL
Blane Kauthen, Deputy City Clerk, called the roll.
Present
Absent
Dennis Solomon, Chairman Barry Present, Chairman Pro Tern
Craig Kunkle, Jr., Vice Chairman
Dick Ansay
Joel Charming
John Glidden
Steven Tarr
Alternate Ernest Volonte
Alternate David Kendall
Also present were Growth Management Director Charles Wu, City Attorney Len Rubin, Planners John
Lindgren and Kara Irwin, Planning Technician Jackie Holloman, and City Forester Mark Hendrickson.
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
August 14, 2001
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Recommendation to City Council
Petition MISC- 01 -09: Horseshoe Acres Unmanned Entr Gates
A request by Edward Roby of Owner /Builder Alliance, on behalf of the Board of Directors of
HorseshoeAcres Club, Inc., for approval to construct an unmanned entry gate system at the entrance
to Horseshoe Acres on Kelso Drive, approximately 187 feet south of Northlake Boulevard (23 -42S-
42E).
Growth Management Director Charles Wu introduced the project. Planning Technician Jackie Holloman
reviewed the staff report. Mr. Edward Roby, agent for the petitioner, reported the residents desired the
requested entry gate system, and answered questions from the Board regarding the turning
configuration..
Mr. Charming made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of Petition MISC -01 -09
• with the following conditions:
1. A Knox key switch shall be provided to allow for emergency access for fire apparatus.
2. The sidewalk, landscaping, and gate shall be installed together as one phase, and shall be
inspected and approved by the City prior to utilizing the gate.
3. Construction and drainage plans conforming to the City's Land Development Regulations,
and signed and sealed by an engineer registered in the State of Florida, shall be submitted
prior to construction plan approval.
Mr. Ansay seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 7 -0 vote.
Public Heating and Recommendation to City Council
Petition PUD- 99 -12: Gardens Corporate Center
Oliver - Glidden & Partners, Inc., agent for an ownership consortium, is requesting a planned unit
development amendment for a 15.6 acre site located at the northeast corner of PGA Boulevard and
Alternate AIA. The proposed amendment includes two six -story office buildings totaling 223,943.
square feet with a separate parking structure. The applicant is also requesting the deletion or
amendment of conditions #9, #12, and #13 of Resolution 118, 1994. (642S -43E)
• Mr. John Glidden stepped down due to conflict of interest, and Mr. Volante was seated in his place.
2
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
August 14, 2001
Ed Oliver presented the project and described the architectural elements. Planner Kara Irwin reviewed
the staff report and clarified that the Board was to review the elevation changes, and that the conditions
that had been changed were items that had been taken care of by other applicants. No site plan issues
or condition issues were to be considered, since the application had already been approved. Mr. Ansay
requested background on the height waiver. Ms. Irwin noted the 10 -story plan had been reduced to 6
stories. Mr. Oliver responded to Mr. Kunkle that he believed the size of the rooftop planters were the
same as the last time this was presented. Mr. Kunkle indicated he wished to maximize draping greenery
from the top. Mr. Oliver explained that only windshields of cars should be visible in the parking garage,
and that the building was higher than the flyover. Mr. Channing questioned architectural details not
being carried around the ends or 45- degree corners and suggested something be done to tie the building
to the parking garage since this would be viewed from the flyover. Mr. Solomon requested what
changes in materials and colors had been made since the last submission which were explained by Mr.
Oliver. Mr. Oliver indicated when this application was first presented, the design for the flyover and
the commitment by FDOT had not been solidified, which now had been accomplished. FDOT had
produced final designs, Oliver Glidden had participated in dressing up the flyover with an architectural
design which had been approved by City Council, and maintenance was covered by the Regional Center
POA. Mr. Oliver indicated he accepted Mr. Channing's suggestion regarding adding the quoins back.
Further explanation of the joints was made by Mr. Oliver. Mr. Channing suggested a larger reveal on
the bottom on the base. Mr. Oliver indicated he would provide a profile to staff, and indicated the items
that would be cased. Mr. Tarr requested more detail on the sides and on the garage, and indicated this
should be a "wow" building since it would be the most visible building in the City. Mr. Tarr indicated
he was confused regarding the style of the architecture.
Chair Solomon declared the public hearing open. Bonnie Eric, Horseshoe Acres, agreed with Mr. Tarr
that this should be a "wow" building, and indicated she would like as much greenery as possible. Ms.
Eric questioned using blue glass with an orange Spanish tile roof. Ms. Eric thanked the Board for their
work on this project. Hearing no further comments from the public, Chair Solomon declared the public
hearing closed.
Mr. Oliver indicated the comments made by the Board would be incorporated and requested approval
to move on to City Council. Mr. Oliver indicated the building was Mediterranean style, that the blue
glass was the right color, and that the building colors were appropriate. Mr. Kunkle was comfortable
with the applicant's commitment to make changes and to move forward Mr. Channing agreed. Mr.
Ansay indicated he would like to see this come back before the Board with more study regarding blue
glass. Mr. Kendall indicated he was in favor of moving forward; Mr. Tarr favored bringing it back.
Chair Solomon felt it could be moved along since there had been five workshops, and indicated he
would be comfortable with an additional condition regarding Mr. Channing's comments on the parking
garage and a step back element. Mr. Channing expressed an interest in bringing it back.
Mr. Channing made a motion to have the applicant return so the Board could look at the modifications.
City Attorney Rubin indicated since this was a public hearing it would be best to reopen the public
3
• Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
August 14, 2001
hearing and continue it to a date certain, September 11, 2001. Chair Solomon reopened the public
hearing. Mr. Ansay seconded the motion. Mr. Tarr commented because of the location and prominence
of the building he believed it would be better to see it one more time. Motion failed by 3 -4 vote.
Mr. Kunkle moved approval of the staff recommendation of recommendation to City Council for
approval of PUD -99 -12 with the conditions stated in the staff report and amendments as
suggested in this meeting as conditions of approval. Mr. Volonte seconded the motion. Mr.
Channing commented that Councilmember Sabatello had said the Board should not do this but
should work everything out before moving forward to City Council. Chair Solomon indicated he
considered this an improved plan. Chair Solomon declared the public hearing closed. Motion
carried by 4 -3 vote with those opposed being Mr. Ansay, Mr. Tarr, and Mr. Channing.
Mr. Channing indicated he would not have voted against approval except that this was such a prominent
building. Chair Solomon responded that those who voted in favor also believed the location to be
important but were satisfied this would be a real plus for the City and look good. Mr. Channing
indicated he respected Mr. Solomon's opinion.
is Recommendation to City Council
Petition SP- 00 -07: Eckerd Drugstore at Promenade (f ka Gardens East Plaza)
This agenda item was pulled.
Workshop
Petition PCD- 00 -02: Ballenlsles PCD Amendment
A request by Hank Skokowski of Urban Design Studio, on behalf of Ballenlsles Country Club, Inc
and MacArthurHoldingA., Inc., foran amendment to the approved Ballenlsles Planned Community
District (PCD) to expand the PCD boundary.
AND
Workshop
Petition SP- 01 -17: Ballenlsles Golf Maintenance Facility
A request by Hank Skokowski of Urban Design Studio, on behalf of Ballenlsles Country Club, Inc
and MacArthur Holding A., Inc., for site plan approval of a golf maintenance facility within the
expanded boundary of Ballenlsles Planned Community District (PCD).
Mr. John Glidden rejoined the Board.
Planner John Glidden presented the staff report. Concerns were access to the site, the architecture of the
building, and whether the waivers should be granted because the building exists. Mr. Channing asked
City Forester Mark Hendrickson about visibility of the building from the bridge over the turnpike, to
In
• Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
August 14, 2001
which Mr. Hendrickson responded that additional landscaping was proposed to lessen visibility.
Henry Skokowski, agent for the applicant, indicated the reality of the existing structure was that it
clearly would not have been built in its present location if it were a new structure, and pointed out
locations where additional landscaping was proposed to screen the property. This would be addressed
with DOT and would be maintained in perpetuity by the applicant. Locations of easements were pointed
out. Areca palms were to be planted at 8' initial height. The issue of access was discussed by Mr.
Skokowski, who explained it had been reconstructed by DOT; and therefore was an approved curb cut,
and the maintenance facility workers arrived early in the morning and left early in the afternoon. Trucks
bringing maintenance materials did not come to the property frequently, so there was not traffic
congestion and there had not been problems in the many years this facility had served the golf course.
Mr. Skokowski indicated the applicant had met with staff regarding the building and planned to screen
heavily with landscaping. The requirement to have foundation planting was requested to be waived
since it would only be visible to the workers. Mr. Skokowski clarified there were no Australian pines
on the property. Traffic would be reduced 5,000 trips, and the building was requested to be able to
remain as a real estate sales and resales office. Mr. Skokowski clarified for the record the use of the
sales center that the building would be used "for sales and resales of real estate within BallenIsles and
elsewhere" as stated in the equity membership documents and tha related services such as mortgage
• broker, title insurance, etc. would not be added. The use was one of the four elements of the PCD
amendment. Mr. Tarr indicated he had no problem with the application so long as it was buffered
properly and could not be seen. In response to Mr. Tarr's concerns, the applicant clarified that the 55'
right -of -way would not be used for additional traffic lanes; and the applicant was keeping the old
driveway because it provided access to the building and because at the end of the driveway there were
manholes for utility access. Mr. Kendall questioned how the entrance off PGA Boulevard would be
addressed and if it would be moved in the future. Mr. Skokowski indicated this maintenance facility had
had the same function for many years and the activity level was not expected to increase. Mr. Kendall
expressed his opinion that additional traffic on PGA Boulevard would contribute to the probability for
an accident at that location. Mr. Skokowski indicated staff had some ideas regarding improving access
in the future. Chair Solomon commented he believed this was a terrible idea, that it was an unsightly
facility, that it was a 50 -year old building and should be torn down and a new structure built, and a
waiver should not be granted just because something exists. Chair Solomon opposed the access from
a safety point of view, and commented applicant was not offering enough to solve this problem by only
planting in the rights -of -way. Mr. Skokowski commented the 55' was all on private property. Mr.
Glidden favored keeping the existing building but addressing visibility by widening and thickening
buffering at northeast corner and placing buffering on the applicant's property. Mr. Skokowski indicated
difficulties in planting because of utility easements. Mr. Glidden also expressed his opinion that the
driveway on the north should not be kept if it was not used much and indicated access should be fed
from the inside courtyard. Mr. Glidden noted the roof was not maintained well in the past and wanted
that to be a condition of approval. Mr. Glidden indicated the access from PGA should be changed to
• be internal when the adjacent property was developed and a condition be added that if that property was
developed as non - residential an alternate access route for vehicles be provided. Planner John Lindgren
Wi
•Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
August 14, 2001
pointed out a future proposed access. Mr. Skokowski clarified that the club equity membership
agreement provided for the continued use of the real estate sales office for sales and resales of real estate
in BallenIsles and elsewhere. Mr. Channing requested staff research the original PCD approval to see
what had been said about the continued use. Mr. Charming agreed with Chair Solomon this was an
eyesore and the entrance to the City would really be hurt when landscaping was removed in the future.
Mr. Kunkle questioned the original servicing intent for the south maintenance facility; Mr. Lindgren
responded that the south maintenance facility had been supposed to replace the north maintenance
facility but the desire was not to disturb the south area because it was a landfill. Mr. Kunkle expressed
his opinion it was incumbent to provide continuity of landscaping rather than using the areca palm
solution. Mr. Ansay expressed his opinion that continuing to develop this site as a service center was
the wrong way to go and that BallenIsles should expand other areas to facilitate necessary service for
the golf course.
Roma Josephs, 323 Sunset Bay Lane, President of the Concerned Homeowners Association of
BallenIsles, an association independent from the developer, indicated she had expressed her concerns
in a letter. Ms. Josephs indicated that staff had worked with them and the Neighborhood Advisory
Committee, and everyone had the same concerns. Bob Kaplan, 102 Windward Drive, recommended
solutions for specific problems. Mr. Kaplan indicated the residents viewed the south side of the facility
• and would like the facility to remain. Mr. Kaplan noted the north facility use had changed and it was
no longer used as a golf maintenance facility, which was all being done out of the east maintenance
facility. The north maintenance facility was now used by the community association and the types of
vehicles and traffic were not as described by the applicant, and in fact the building was used
substantially and was important to the community. Mr. Kaplan provided a power point presentation.
Mr. Kaplan commented the landscaping at BallenIsles was great and the residents paid for it 100 %. In
contrast, the landscaping at the north maintenance facility was provided by the developer who did not
have the amount of funds available that the residents had. Mr. Kaplan indicated that the facility was
identified in the PCD in 1989 which required lush full landscaping all along the buffer; showed pictures
depicting what the residents see — garbage trucks, etc. - -, and expressed concern that the areca palms would
not match the rest of the BallenIsles landscaping. Mr. Kaplan recommended placing the foundation
plantings in front of the areca palms to provide a fuller buffer. Mr. Kaplan noted residents did not want
real estate related businesses to be allowed. Mr. Kaplan suggested a solution for the access road which
was to get a conditional easement in case the access was closed in the future. Mr. Kaplan requested the
south maintenance facility be deleted and indicated the land was leased by MacArthur Foundation for
25 years and the residents wanted the same conditions placed on that area as the other land that was
transferred. Mr. Kaplan commented the roof was now maintained and that the facility was important
to the residents. Dr. Robert Davis, 118 Orchid Cay, commented 85% of the BallenIsles people when
signing the equity agreement, agreed to let the sales office become a business sales office, but were
coerced into signing because if they did not they could not play golf or tennis. Dr. Davis commented
the land where the sales office was located was zoned low density residential and suggested a bypass
• through the area where the sales office was located to address safety concerns. The Board did not agree
on having the building remain, agreed that any PCD buffers originally approved should be in place, and
T
•
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
August 14, 2001
did not agree to maintain access until the adjacent parcel was developed but some members wanted to
look at this as a new site. Applicant was asked to clarify the current use. Mr. Tarr asked if an option
was to do nothing so that the violations would be considered as code enforcement issues. Mr.
Skokowski indicated the applicant did not want that. Applicant requested to go to a public hearing next,
to which the Board and staff agreed. Roma Josephs asked if there was the possibility of an easement
through the sales center and the MacArthur property, which Chair Solomon indicated would be handled
by staff.
OLD BUSINESS
Mr. Glidden commented work was continuing on the design guidelines and staff was working on
cleaning up the submittal requirements for PUD applications.
Mr. Glidden reported City Council overrode the P &Z decision and allowed the 3801 Building to have
their sign at the top of the building, and cables had been run over the top of the building and were visible
and unsightly. Chair Solomon indicated a picture showing that should be taken. Mr. Wu indicated staff
would provide a written response. Mr. Charming indicated it was important to see the drawings.
NEW BUSINESS
Everyone was urged to attend the orientation workshop on August 22 and all indicated they could attend
Chair Solomon commented it was important to limit comments from the public. Mr. Wu indicated all
issues that could be brought out at a workshop would provide a smoother public hearing. Mr. Ansay
felt strongly that all input should be presented at workshops by the people involved, and asked if it was
the responsibility of the City to make the developer live up to the agreements. The City Attorney
indicated it was a code enforcement issue. Chair Solomon indicated the equity agreements discussed
were private with BallenIsles. Mr. Charming questioned how a commercial use could be requested on
property zoned residential. Mr. Wu indicated the zoning must be adhered to no matter what they had
agreed.
7
• Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
August 14, 2001
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. The next regular meeting will
be held August 28, 2001.
APPROVED:
SteveA T`
Dick Ansay
Alternate David Kendall
• Blane Kauthen, Secretary for the Meeting
FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
1
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LA -FIRST NAME -MIDDLE NAME
NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE
Gli . John
i&E
Planning and Zoning
MAILING ADDRESS
THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A
8 Huntly Circle
UNIT OF:
CITY X COUNTY OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
CITY COUNTY
NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION:
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418 Palm Beach
Palm Beach Gardens
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED
MY POSITION IS:
August 14, 2001
ELECTIVE APPOINTIVE x
WHO MUST FILE FORM 86
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board,
council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are
presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory;
although the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by
law.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict will vary greatly depending on whether
you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
OFFICERS:
n holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
inWs to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which insures to
the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained.
In either case, you, should disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on
which you are abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for
recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which insures
to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which insures to the special
gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained.
A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must
disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether
made by the officer or at his direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE
WILL BE TAKEN:
• You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible
for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes.
• A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest.
10-YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
• You should complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording
the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
1, John Glidden, hereby disclose that on August 14, 2001:
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
inured to my special private gain; or
X inured to the special gain of PGA Corporate Center, by whom my partner is retained.
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is a follows:
•
Date Filed: August 27, 2001
Sig ture
E: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED
D,— CLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:
IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY,
REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000.
GAADMWERSONALUGHNW&APGACORP Page 2
w FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LA` E - FIRST NAME - MIDDLE NAME
NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE
G , B. John
Planning and Zoning
MAILING ADDRESS
THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A
8 Huntley Circle
UNIT OF:
XX CITY COUNTY OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
CITY Palm Beach Gardens COUNTY Palm Beach
NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: Palm Beach Gardens
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED August 14, 2001
MY POSITION IS:
ELECTIVE APPOINTIVE XX
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8113
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board,
council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are
presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory;
although the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to,use it in making the disclosure required by
law.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict will vary greatly depending on whether
you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the form.
•
•
A N DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
I, John Glidden, hereby disclose that on August 14, 2001:
(aWeasure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
inured to my special private gain; or
inured to the special gain of Abraham Gosman and AMA Land Ventures, by whom my partner, Ed Oliver is retained.
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of ny interest in the measure is a follows:
Gardens Corporate Center
•
I I oc� 0(
Date Filed
Si tur
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985), A FAILURE 'TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED
DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:
IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY,
REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000.
L :IADMIMPERSONALUGHNIP &Zlgar&con Page 2
•
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8113
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board,
council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are
presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory;
although the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by
law.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict will vary greatly depending on whether
you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the form.
•
FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
LA E - FIRST NAME - MIDDLE NAME
NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE
GAW, B. John
Planning and Zoning
MAILING ADDRESS
THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A
S Huntley Circle
UNIT OF:
XX CITY COUNTY OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
CITY Palm Beach Gardens COUNTY Palm Beach
NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: Palm Beach Gardens
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED August 14, 2001
MY POSITION IS:
XX
ELECTIVE APPOINTIVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8113
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board,
council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are
presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory;
although the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by
law.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict will vary greatly depending on whether
you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the form.
•
.. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
I, John Glidden, hereby disclose that on August 14, 2001:
(a *easure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
inured to my special private gain; or
inured to the special gain of _Mandevco Poperties, by whom I am retained.
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is a follows:
Eckerds at Promenade Plaza
•
l( Dc� oI
Date Filed
opzll� I---
Sign ture
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED
DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:
IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY,
REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000.
L:�ADM IN \P E RSONALUGHMP &MEck3con.wpd
•
Page 2