Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z 081401CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION August 14, 2001 MINUTES The Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, was called to order by Chair Dennis Solomon at 6:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex, 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. CITY COUNCIL LIAISON There were no items by the City Council Liaison. REPORT BY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR Growth Management Director Charles Wu reported that City Council approvals granted at their August 2, 2001 meeting included Frenchman's Reserve Pods "F" and "D" with additional landscaping; Mirasol Parcel 8; elimination of time extension for Hidden Hollow, Mirasol PCD amendment, and future land • use change small scale amendment at the southwest corner of Northlake and Congress Avenue. The City Council postponed indefinitely changes in uses for the Regional Center DRI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Ansay made a motion to approve the July 24, 2001 meeting minutes as submitted. Mr. Volante seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 7 -0 vote. ROLL CALL Blane Kauthen, Deputy City Clerk, called the roll. Present Absent Dennis Solomon, Chairman Barry Present, Chairman Pro Tern Craig Kunkle, Jr., Vice Chairman Dick Ansay Joel Charming John Glidden Steven Tarr Alternate Ernest Volonte Alternate David Kendall Also present were Growth Management Director Charles Wu, City Attorney Len Rubin, Planners John Lindgren and Kara Irwin, Planning Technician Jackie Holloman, and City Forester Mark Hendrickson. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes August 14, 2001 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Recommendation to City Council Petition MISC- 01 -09: Horseshoe Acres Unmanned Entr Gates A request by Edward Roby of Owner /Builder Alliance, on behalf of the Board of Directors of HorseshoeAcres Club, Inc., for approval to construct an unmanned entry gate system at the entrance to Horseshoe Acres on Kelso Drive, approximately 187 feet south of Northlake Boulevard (23 -42S- 42E). Growth Management Director Charles Wu introduced the project. Planning Technician Jackie Holloman reviewed the staff report. Mr. Edward Roby, agent for the petitioner, reported the residents desired the requested entry gate system, and answered questions from the Board regarding the turning configuration.. Mr. Charming made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of Petition MISC -01 -09 • with the following conditions: 1. A Knox key switch shall be provided to allow for emergency access for fire apparatus. 2. The sidewalk, landscaping, and gate shall be installed together as one phase, and shall be inspected and approved by the City prior to utilizing the gate. 3. Construction and drainage plans conforming to the City's Land Development Regulations, and signed and sealed by an engineer registered in the State of Florida, shall be submitted prior to construction plan approval. Mr. Ansay seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 7 -0 vote. Public Heating and Recommendation to City Council Petition PUD- 99 -12: Gardens Corporate Center Oliver - Glidden & Partners, Inc., agent for an ownership consortium, is requesting a planned unit development amendment for a 15.6 acre site located at the northeast corner of PGA Boulevard and Alternate AIA. The proposed amendment includes two six -story office buildings totaling 223,943. square feet with a separate parking structure. The applicant is also requesting the deletion or amendment of conditions #9, #12, and #13 of Resolution 118, 1994. (642S -43E) • Mr. John Glidden stepped down due to conflict of interest, and Mr. Volante was seated in his place. 2 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes August 14, 2001 Ed Oliver presented the project and described the architectural elements. Planner Kara Irwin reviewed the staff report and clarified that the Board was to review the elevation changes, and that the conditions that had been changed were items that had been taken care of by other applicants. No site plan issues or condition issues were to be considered, since the application had already been approved. Mr. Ansay requested background on the height waiver. Ms. Irwin noted the 10 -story plan had been reduced to 6 stories. Mr. Oliver responded to Mr. Kunkle that he believed the size of the rooftop planters were the same as the last time this was presented. Mr. Kunkle indicated he wished to maximize draping greenery from the top. Mr. Oliver explained that only windshields of cars should be visible in the parking garage, and that the building was higher than the flyover. Mr. Channing questioned architectural details not being carried around the ends or 45- degree corners and suggested something be done to tie the building to the parking garage since this would be viewed from the flyover. Mr. Solomon requested what changes in materials and colors had been made since the last submission which were explained by Mr. Oliver. Mr. Oliver indicated when this application was first presented, the design for the flyover and the commitment by FDOT had not been solidified, which now had been accomplished. FDOT had produced final designs, Oliver Glidden had participated in dressing up the flyover with an architectural design which had been approved by City Council, and maintenance was covered by the Regional Center POA. Mr. Oliver indicated he accepted Mr. Channing's suggestion regarding adding the quoins back. Further explanation of the joints was made by Mr. Oliver. Mr. Channing suggested a larger reveal on the bottom on the base. Mr. Oliver indicated he would provide a profile to staff, and indicated the items that would be cased. Mr. Tarr requested more detail on the sides and on the garage, and indicated this should be a "wow" building since it would be the most visible building in the City. Mr. Tarr indicated he was confused regarding the style of the architecture. Chair Solomon declared the public hearing open. Bonnie Eric, Horseshoe Acres, agreed with Mr. Tarr that this should be a "wow" building, and indicated she would like as much greenery as possible. Ms. Eric questioned using blue glass with an orange Spanish tile roof. Ms. Eric thanked the Board for their work on this project. Hearing no further comments from the public, Chair Solomon declared the public hearing closed. Mr. Oliver indicated the comments made by the Board would be incorporated and requested approval to move on to City Council. Mr. Oliver indicated the building was Mediterranean style, that the blue glass was the right color, and that the building colors were appropriate. Mr. Kunkle was comfortable with the applicant's commitment to make changes and to move forward Mr. Channing agreed. Mr. Ansay indicated he would like to see this come back before the Board with more study regarding blue glass. Mr. Kendall indicated he was in favor of moving forward; Mr. Tarr favored bringing it back. Chair Solomon felt it could be moved along since there had been five workshops, and indicated he would be comfortable with an additional condition regarding Mr. Channing's comments on the parking garage and a step back element. Mr. Channing expressed an interest in bringing it back. Mr. Channing made a motion to have the applicant return so the Board could look at the modifications. City Attorney Rubin indicated since this was a public hearing it would be best to reopen the public 3 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes August 14, 2001 hearing and continue it to a date certain, September 11, 2001. Chair Solomon reopened the public hearing. Mr. Ansay seconded the motion. Mr. Tarr commented because of the location and prominence of the building he believed it would be better to see it one more time. Motion failed by 3 -4 vote. Mr. Kunkle moved approval of the staff recommendation of recommendation to City Council for approval of PUD -99 -12 with the conditions stated in the staff report and amendments as suggested in this meeting as conditions of approval. Mr. Volonte seconded the motion. Mr. Channing commented that Councilmember Sabatello had said the Board should not do this but should work everything out before moving forward to City Council. Chair Solomon indicated he considered this an improved plan. Chair Solomon declared the public hearing closed. Motion carried by 4 -3 vote with those opposed being Mr. Ansay, Mr. Tarr, and Mr. Channing. Mr. Channing indicated he would not have voted against approval except that this was such a prominent building. Chair Solomon responded that those who voted in favor also believed the location to be important but were satisfied this would be a real plus for the City and look good. Mr. Channing indicated he respected Mr. Solomon's opinion. is Recommendation to City Council Petition SP- 00 -07: Eckerd Drugstore at Promenade (f ka Gardens East Plaza) This agenda item was pulled. Workshop Petition PCD- 00 -02: Ballenlsles PCD Amendment A request by Hank Skokowski of Urban Design Studio, on behalf of Ballenlsles Country Club, Inc and MacArthurHoldingA., Inc., foran amendment to the approved Ballenlsles Planned Community District (PCD) to expand the PCD boundary. AND Workshop Petition SP- 01 -17: Ballenlsles Golf Maintenance Facility A request by Hank Skokowski of Urban Design Studio, on behalf of Ballenlsles Country Club, Inc and MacArthur Holding A., Inc., for site plan approval of a golf maintenance facility within the expanded boundary of Ballenlsles Planned Community District (PCD). Mr. John Glidden rejoined the Board. Planner John Glidden presented the staff report. Concerns were access to the site, the architecture of the building, and whether the waivers should be granted because the building exists. Mr. Channing asked City Forester Mark Hendrickson about visibility of the building from the bridge over the turnpike, to In • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes August 14, 2001 which Mr. Hendrickson responded that additional landscaping was proposed to lessen visibility. Henry Skokowski, agent for the applicant, indicated the reality of the existing structure was that it clearly would not have been built in its present location if it were a new structure, and pointed out locations where additional landscaping was proposed to screen the property. This would be addressed with DOT and would be maintained in perpetuity by the applicant. Locations of easements were pointed out. Areca palms were to be planted at 8' initial height. The issue of access was discussed by Mr. Skokowski, who explained it had been reconstructed by DOT; and therefore was an approved curb cut, and the maintenance facility workers arrived early in the morning and left early in the afternoon. Trucks bringing maintenance materials did not come to the property frequently, so there was not traffic congestion and there had not been problems in the many years this facility had served the golf course. Mr. Skokowski indicated the applicant had met with staff regarding the building and planned to screen heavily with landscaping. The requirement to have foundation planting was requested to be waived since it would only be visible to the workers. Mr. Skokowski clarified there were no Australian pines on the property. Traffic would be reduced 5,000 trips, and the building was requested to be able to remain as a real estate sales and resales office. Mr. Skokowski clarified for the record the use of the sales center that the building would be used "for sales and resales of real estate within BallenIsles and elsewhere" as stated in the equity membership documents and tha related services such as mortgage • broker, title insurance, etc. would not be added. The use was one of the four elements of the PCD amendment. Mr. Tarr indicated he had no problem with the application so long as it was buffered properly and could not be seen. In response to Mr. Tarr's concerns, the applicant clarified that the 55' right -of -way would not be used for additional traffic lanes; and the applicant was keeping the old driveway because it provided access to the building and because at the end of the driveway there were manholes for utility access. Mr. Kendall questioned how the entrance off PGA Boulevard would be addressed and if it would be moved in the future. Mr. Skokowski indicated this maintenance facility had had the same function for many years and the activity level was not expected to increase. Mr. Kendall expressed his opinion that additional traffic on PGA Boulevard would contribute to the probability for an accident at that location. Mr. Skokowski indicated staff had some ideas regarding improving access in the future. Chair Solomon commented he believed this was a terrible idea, that it was an unsightly facility, that it was a 50 -year old building and should be torn down and a new structure built, and a waiver should not be granted just because something exists. Chair Solomon opposed the access from a safety point of view, and commented applicant was not offering enough to solve this problem by only planting in the rights -of -way. Mr. Skokowski commented the 55' was all on private property. Mr. Glidden favored keeping the existing building but addressing visibility by widening and thickening buffering at northeast corner and placing buffering on the applicant's property. Mr. Skokowski indicated difficulties in planting because of utility easements. Mr. Glidden also expressed his opinion that the driveway on the north should not be kept if it was not used much and indicated access should be fed from the inside courtyard. Mr. Glidden noted the roof was not maintained well in the past and wanted that to be a condition of approval. Mr. Glidden indicated the access from PGA should be changed to • be internal when the adjacent property was developed and a condition be added that if that property was developed as non - residential an alternate access route for vehicles be provided. Planner John Lindgren Wi •Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes August 14, 2001 pointed out a future proposed access. Mr. Skokowski clarified that the club equity membership agreement provided for the continued use of the real estate sales office for sales and resales of real estate in BallenIsles and elsewhere. Mr. Channing requested staff research the original PCD approval to see what had been said about the continued use. Mr. Charming agreed with Chair Solomon this was an eyesore and the entrance to the City would really be hurt when landscaping was removed in the future. Mr. Kunkle questioned the original servicing intent for the south maintenance facility; Mr. Lindgren responded that the south maintenance facility had been supposed to replace the north maintenance facility but the desire was not to disturb the south area because it was a landfill. Mr. Kunkle expressed his opinion it was incumbent to provide continuity of landscaping rather than using the areca palm solution. Mr. Ansay expressed his opinion that continuing to develop this site as a service center was the wrong way to go and that BallenIsles should expand other areas to facilitate necessary service for the golf course. Roma Josephs, 323 Sunset Bay Lane, President of the Concerned Homeowners Association of BallenIsles, an association independent from the developer, indicated she had expressed her concerns in a letter. Ms. Josephs indicated that staff had worked with them and the Neighborhood Advisory Committee, and everyone had the same concerns. Bob Kaplan, 102 Windward Drive, recommended solutions for specific problems. Mr. Kaplan indicated the residents viewed the south side of the facility • and would like the facility to remain. Mr. Kaplan noted the north facility use had changed and it was no longer used as a golf maintenance facility, which was all being done out of the east maintenance facility. The north maintenance facility was now used by the community association and the types of vehicles and traffic were not as described by the applicant, and in fact the building was used substantially and was important to the community. Mr. Kaplan provided a power point presentation. Mr. Kaplan commented the landscaping at BallenIsles was great and the residents paid for it 100 %. In contrast, the landscaping at the north maintenance facility was provided by the developer who did not have the amount of funds available that the residents had. Mr. Kaplan indicated that the facility was identified in the PCD in 1989 which required lush full landscaping all along the buffer; showed pictures depicting what the residents see — garbage trucks, etc. - -, and expressed concern that the areca palms would not match the rest of the BallenIsles landscaping. Mr. Kaplan recommended placing the foundation plantings in front of the areca palms to provide a fuller buffer. Mr. Kaplan noted residents did not want real estate related businesses to be allowed. Mr. Kaplan suggested a solution for the access road which was to get a conditional easement in case the access was closed in the future. Mr. Kaplan requested the south maintenance facility be deleted and indicated the land was leased by MacArthur Foundation for 25 years and the residents wanted the same conditions placed on that area as the other land that was transferred. Mr. Kaplan commented the roof was now maintained and that the facility was important to the residents. Dr. Robert Davis, 118 Orchid Cay, commented 85% of the BallenIsles people when signing the equity agreement, agreed to let the sales office become a business sales office, but were coerced into signing because if they did not they could not play golf or tennis. Dr. Davis commented the land where the sales office was located was zoned low density residential and suggested a bypass • through the area where the sales office was located to address safety concerns. The Board did not agree on having the building remain, agreed that any PCD buffers originally approved should be in place, and T • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes August 14, 2001 did not agree to maintain access until the adjacent parcel was developed but some members wanted to look at this as a new site. Applicant was asked to clarify the current use. Mr. Tarr asked if an option was to do nothing so that the violations would be considered as code enforcement issues. Mr. Skokowski indicated the applicant did not want that. Applicant requested to go to a public hearing next, to which the Board and staff agreed. Roma Josephs asked if there was the possibility of an easement through the sales center and the MacArthur property, which Chair Solomon indicated would be handled by staff. OLD BUSINESS Mr. Glidden commented work was continuing on the design guidelines and staff was working on cleaning up the submittal requirements for PUD applications. Mr. Glidden reported City Council overrode the P &Z decision and allowed the 3801 Building to have their sign at the top of the building, and cables had been run over the top of the building and were visible and unsightly. Chair Solomon indicated a picture showing that should be taken. Mr. Wu indicated staff would provide a written response. Mr. Charming indicated it was important to see the drawings. NEW BUSINESS Everyone was urged to attend the orientation workshop on August 22 and all indicated they could attend Chair Solomon commented it was important to limit comments from the public. Mr. Wu indicated all issues that could be brought out at a workshop would provide a smoother public hearing. Mr. Ansay felt strongly that all input should be presented at workshops by the people involved, and asked if it was the responsibility of the City to make the developer live up to the agreements. The City Attorney indicated it was a code enforcement issue. Chair Solomon indicated the equity agreements discussed were private with BallenIsles. Mr. Charming questioned how a commercial use could be requested on property zoned residential. Mr. Wu indicated the zoning must be adhered to no matter what they had agreed. 7 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes August 14, 2001 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 p.m. The next regular meeting will be held August 28, 2001. APPROVED: SteveA T` Dick Ansay Alternate David Kendall • Blane Kauthen, Secretary for the Meeting FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR 1 COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LA -FIRST NAME -MIDDLE NAME NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE Gli . John i&E Planning and Zoning MAILING ADDRESS THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A 8 Huntly Circle UNIT OF: CITY X COUNTY OTHER LOCAL AGENCY CITY COUNTY NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418 Palm Beach Palm Beach Gardens DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED MY POSITION IS: August 14, 2001 ELECTIVE APPOINTIVE x WHO MUST FILE FORM 86 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; although the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES OFFICERS: n holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inWs to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which insures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. In either case, you, should disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which insures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which insures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether made by the officer or at his direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. • A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest. 10-YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You should complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST 1, John Glidden, hereby disclose that on August 14, 2001: (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain; or X inured to the special gain of PGA Corporate Center, by whom my partner is retained. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is a follows: • Date Filed: August 27, 2001 Sig ture E: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED D,— CLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000. GAADMWERSONALUGHNW&APGACORP Page 2 w FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LA` E - FIRST NAME - MIDDLE NAME NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE G , B. John Planning and Zoning MAILING ADDRESS THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A 8 Huntley Circle UNIT OF: XX CITY COUNTY OTHER LOCAL AGENCY CITY Palm Beach Gardens COUNTY Palm Beach NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: Palm Beach Gardens DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED August 14, 2001 MY POSITION IS: ELECTIVE APPOINTIVE XX WHO MUST FILE FORM 8113 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; although the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to,use it in making the disclosure required by law. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. • • A N DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST I, John Glidden, hereby disclose that on August 14, 2001: (aWeasure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of Abraham Gosman and AMA Land Ventures, by whom my partner, Ed Oliver is retained. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of ny interest in the measure is a follows: Gardens Corporate Center • I I oc� 0( Date Filed Si tur NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985), A FAILURE 'TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000. L :IADMIMPERSONALUGHNIP &Zlgar&con Page 2 • WHO MUST FILE FORM 8113 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; although the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. • FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LA E - FIRST NAME - MIDDLE NAME NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE GAW, B. John Planning and Zoning MAILING ADDRESS THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A S Huntley Circle UNIT OF: XX CITY COUNTY OTHER LOCAL AGENCY CITY Palm Beach Gardens COUNTY Palm Beach NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: Palm Beach Gardens DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED August 14, 2001 MY POSITION IS: XX ELECTIVE APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 8113 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; although the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. • .. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST I, John Glidden, hereby disclose that on August 14, 2001: (a *easure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of _Mandevco Poperties, by whom I am retained. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is a follows: Eckerds at Promenade Plaza • l( Dc� oI Date Filed opzll� I--- Sign ture NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000. L:�ADM IN \P E RSONALUGHMP &MEck3con.wpd • Page 2