Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRC - 111606 - Monet Office BuildingDevelopment Review Committee Meeting November 16, 2006 MONET OFFICE BUILDING PPUD- 06 -09 -10 Preliminary Project Meeting Present at Meeting Julius Barone, City of Palm Beach Gardens, Police Department Ray Caranci, City of Palm Beach Gardens Forestry Technician Janes Paisley, Monet Rd., LLC Randy Levitt, Monet Rd, LLC Mike Hagerty, Simmons & White Paul Buri, Simmons & White Marty Minor, Urban Design Studio Randy Hansen, Inter Plan, Inc. Aries Page, City of Palm Beach Gardens, Geographic Information Systems Brad Wiseman, City of Palm Beach Gardens, Growth Management Ross Gilmore, City of Palm Beach Gardens, Growth Management Richard J. Marrero, City of Palm Beach Gardens, Growth Management Mark Hendrickson, City of Palm Beach Gardens, Growth Management Judy Dye, LBFH The meeting was called to order at 1:15 p.m. The meeting focus was directed toward City of Palm Beach Gardens Memorandums: from Richard Marrero to Marty Minor, dated November 14, 2006 and City of Palm Beach Gardens Memo to File, dated November 14, 2006. Aries Page noted the access easement must be named if the building owner will use a name other than "Square ", as noted for adjoining property. Julius Barone noted his concerns about safety and security during the construction phase and after the structure is occupied. His concerns include proper security lighting and a security guard stationed at the construction site. He stated the applicant must do what is necessary to secure the sight at all times. Officer Barone stated the area is to be shielded from the general public and the proper alarm systems in place when construction commences. He requested the applicant submit a Security Management Program for the project as soon as possible. Ray Caranci and Mark Hendrickson led the discussion on landscaping /vegetation issues. Proper landscaping must be around the entrance sign site and noted on the final plans which will be submitted at a later date. The preliminary plans do not include the following information which must be submitted to the City; plan for removal /control of existing vegetation, irrigation plan, plan for all landscaping which includes items such as sod, foundation landscaping, landscaping the islands, palm trees, oak trees and the buffer area. Richard Marrero led the discussion on the signage issues, details for the monument and wall mounted sign for the structure need to be submitted. The City suggested a waiver for the monument and wall mounted sign could be possible and there is not a proposal for an off -site sign at this time. Judy Dye commented that the Non - Certification items as stated in memo need to be addressed. Judy and others expressed their comments and concerns regarding the following issues; clearance for trucks loading, unloading versus the landscaping, a clearance of thirteen and one half feet should be maintained between the trucks and the trees. The City will go on site to check for proper clearance. The berm placement is in question and needs to be noted on the plans. The representative for the project was asked to include the oak trees in the proper placement of the berm. The City officials reminded all present a 3 -to -1 slope is standard and in the City code. Richard Marrero stated that the ratio of square footage for medical versus professional is not an issue due to traffic concurrency. It was discussed and all agreed a public workshop meeting with surrounding property owners should take place and December 12 was suggested as a date and will be considered. Notices will be sent to surrounding property owners at the proper time. It was determined that the final plans for the project are not required for the workshop. It was also noted that this property is land - locked and provides unique challenges to the City code. All participants agreed to a January target date for the hearing. Having no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 2:45 p.m. Submitted by: y Ellin Deputy City Clerk D CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM TO: Judy Dye (attachments) Scott Fetterman (attachments) Mark Hendrickson (attachments) Bruce Gregg (attachments) Mike Morrow Christine Tatum/Nancy Stroud Doug Wise Jules Barone (attachments) Todd Engle DATE: October 23, 2006 FROM: Richard Marrero, Planner/ Project Manager SUBJECT: Development Review Committee Jack Doughney Kelvin Wise Angela Wong Tonya Deal Rick Kania Layle Knox Alan Boaz Ray Ellis Aries Page A Development Review Committee meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, November 16, 2006, in the Council Chambers to review the following development application: PPUD - 06-09- 000010: Monet Office Building ...... at 1 p.m. Marty Minor of Urban Design Studio, on behalf of Monet Road LLC, is requesting DRC certification for Monet Office Building (PUD). This PUD request is for a 2.57 - acre parcel located south of RCA Boulevard and west of Prosperity Farms Road. The proposed development consists of 22,000 square feet of medical office and 16, 064 square feet of professional office. Our office requests participation in the review of this project. Please review this request and attend the meeting if possible, bringing written comments. If you cannot attend, please send our office your comments. If you have no concerns at this time, please state so below after your name. Otherwise a letter of recommendation and conditions will be most helpful. Application materials and plans for review are available in the Growth Management Department. Thank you for your ongoing cooperation and assistance. Please contact our office at 799 -4243 if you have any questions. * ** Please be advised that the applicant has 30 days to respond to DRC comments or the petition will be withdrawn. The applicant may request, in writing, one (1) 30- day extension from the Growth Management Administrator. Brad Wiseman, Planning Manager Page 1 of 3 Richard Marrero, Planner/Project Manager Mark Hendrickson, City Forester Ray Caranci, Forestry Technician Judy Dye, Assistant City Engineer Scott Fetterman, Deputy Chief Admin. Julius Barone, Crime Prevention Bruce Gregg, Seacoast Utilities Todd Engle, Interim Construction Svcs. Doug Wise, Building Official Jack Doughney, Community Service Admin. Layle Knox, NPBCID Richard Kania, Waste Management Tonya Deal, PBC School Board Allan Boaz, Florida Power & Light Mike Morrow, Public Works Stacy Rundle, Asst. to the City Manager Kelvin Wise, Code Enforcement Supervisor Christine Tatum, City Attorney Nancy Stroud, Assistant City Attorney Angela Wong, Project Manager Aries Page, GIS Manager cc: Kara Irwin, Growth Management Administrator Stephen Stepp, Police Chief Patricia Snider, City Clerk Ray Ellis, Deputy City Clerk Marty Minor, Urban Design Studio Page 2 of 3 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM TO: Marty Minor, AICP DATE: November 14, 2006 FROM: Richard Marrero, Planner SUBJECT: Staff Comments: Monet Office Building DEADLINE: Please respond to comments by December 14, 2006 M U Nf-7- Petition PUD- 04 -03: ' 1. The Applicant shall request an additional waiver should signage be located above the first -floor line of the Office Building. 2. The Applicant shall submit a detailed signage package or make a notation on the architectural plans as to what color(s), font(s), etc. the signage shall be for the Office Building. Please be advised any signage proposed must be in conformance with City Code Section 78 -285, Permitted Signs. The Applicant has indicated on the site plan that an Art in Public Places piece will be provided on -site. Please be advised that a separate development application must be filed with the City and is subject to the review and approval of the Art in Public Places review Board. 4. The Applicant shall submit a detail of the monument sign proposed for the subject site. Please review City Code Section 78 -259 for conformance with the signage requirements. The Applicant shall remove the waiver request for relief from the front yard setback. City staff has determined this waiver request is unnecessary due to the lot configuration. Memo to File To: Richard Marrero, Planner Through: Mark Hendrickson, City Forester From: Ray Caranci, Forestry Technician Subject: PPUD- 06 -09 -10 Monet Office Building Date: November 14, 2006 I have reviewed the Land Development Regulations for the above referenced application and provide the following comments for the DRC meeting: Certification Items 1. In accordance with Section 78 -305 (c) 7 a, b of the LDR, the data table is incomplete, please show totals. Also, please show square footage of open space and impervious areas, and calculated open space points per 100 square feet for the total project. Prior to scheduling Planning and Zoning approval, the open space calculations need to be verified by Palm Beach Gardens GIS. 2. In accordance with Section 78 -305 (c) 7 d.[78 -287 (c)] of the LDR, landscaping requirements for signs, minimum widths of front and side landscaping should equal the height of the sign. Please provide details to verify the landscape area is correct. 3. In accordance with Section 78 -305 (c) 7 e. of the LDR, cross sections of buffers and parking lot areas should be included with the landscape plan. We suggest a cross section from the office building to the residential property to the west. Please provide a detail of how the typical perimeter drainage berm will not conflict with the proposed tree protection within the buffer. 4. In accordance with Section 78 -305 (c) 7 g. of the LDR, there should be a note on prohibited plant species removal and control. 5. In accordance with Section 78 -305 (c) 7 k of the LDR, a conceptual irrigation system plan shall be included. Please provide prior to presentation to City Council. 6. In accordance with Section 78 -313 (b) of the LDR, not more than 40% of the total landscape area shall be covered with sod. Please show the percentage of open space that is to be sod. 7. In accordance with Section 78 -313 (d) (1) of the LDR, concerning specimen trees, please show the number and percentage protected in place or relocated on site. 8. In accordance with Section 78 -320 (a) (4) b, c of the LDR, regarding minimum standards for foundation landscaping. The Palms indicated need to be a minimum of 30% of the wall height, or according to Table 30, wall height greater than 25 - 35 feet the minimum tree height is 16 feet, minimum palm height is 18 to 22 feet. 9. In accordance with Section 78 -315 (b) of the LDR, landscape islands are required for every nine parking spaces located in a row. Please include the necessary islands at the south side of the parking area. Due to the waiver request, more of the existing oaks and Sabal palms should be used in the 8 foot buffer areas at the perimeter of the property. Due to hurricane risks, the Washingtonia palms may be replaced with the more durable Sabal palms already on site. PLEASE NOTE: Prior to final approval, Staff would appreciate the ability to salvage any remaining trees or palms. Non - Certification Items 1. The parking lot drains and exfiltration trench in the South parking lot are in conflict with the preserved oak and should be moved closer to the center of the parking lot to be as far away as possible from the root system of the 28 inch diameter oak tree to be preserved. 2. The landscape plan shows the water lines in different places than the engineering plan. Please correct the landscape plan to show the utilities and easements to be consistent with the engineering plan. Also, Please understand that additional information may be requested, and staff may have additional comments as the review process continues. Llbtfh� CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS CIVIL AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES WATER & WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION SURVEY & MAPPING GIS "Partners For Results Value By Design" 3550 S.W. Corporate Pkwy. Palm City, FL 34990 (772) 286 -3883 Fax (772) 286 -3925 www.lbfh.com MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Marrero FROM: Judy A. T. Dye DATE: October 19, 2006 FILE NO. 06 -4480 SUBJECT: Monet Office Building PUD Review PPUD 06 -09- 000010 We have reviewed the following plans and information for the above referenced project received October 13, 2006: • Development Application and Project Narrative prepared by Urban Design Studio. • PUD Application and Concurrency Request prepared by Urban Design Studio. • Capacity Letter from Waste Management dated January 19, 2006. • Letter from Waste Management dated May 25, 2006. • Capacity Letter from Seacoast Utility Authority dated May 23, 2006. • Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc. • Site Plan and Details prepared by Urban Design Studio. • Conceptual Landscape Plan prepared by Urban Design Studio. • Site Lighting Plan prepared by C & W Engineering. • Architectural Plans prepared by Inter -Plan Inc. • Drainage Statement prepared by Simmons & White. • Conceptual Paving, Drainage, Water & Wastewater Plan prepared by Simmons & White. • Boundary & Topographic Survey prepared by Mixon Land Surveying, Inc. • Aerial Photo of Site Location prepared by Urban Design Studio. • Location Map. We have the following comments: • The applicant proposes the development of a 38,064 sq. ft. professional /medical office building on the proposed 2.57 acre site, south of RCA Boulevard and west of Prosperity Farms Road and is requesting concurrency review. • We have forwarded the Traffic Impact Analysis to the City's traffic consultant, McMahon & Associates, and to Palm Beach County Traffic Department for review and comment. We will forward their comments when they are received. PA\PB GMEMO \4480 \4480d.doc I&E Monet Office Building Page 2 of 8 LBFH File No. 06 -4480 INC. As the plans submitted for this review are identified as conceptual, we provide the following comments for the information of the applicant. Additional comments will be provided when more detailed plans are submitted for review. Certification Issues 1. The applicant shall identify the pipe material and segment lengths on the plan view per Section 78 -46 of the LDR. The applicant is reminded that only reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) is permitted under load bearing surfaces. 2. The applicant shall identify the location of the control structure on the engineering and landscape plan per Section 78 -46 of the LDR. 3. The applicant shall address, within the drainage statement, their rights to utilize the existing offsite storm drainage system to accommodate the drainage of the proposed project, per Section 78 -46 of the LDR. 4. The applicant shall modify the notes, on the site plan (Sheet 2 of 2), which are cut off at the right margin. 5. The applicant shall provide cross sections of the site, at all boundaries from the proposed buildings, clearly showing how the site matches existing conditions per Section 78 -46 of the LDR. 6. The applicant shall revise the photometric plan for conformance with Ordinance 26, 2006, adopted September 20, 2006, which modifies Section 78 -182 of the LDR. Specifically: a. The applicant shall revise the lighting level of the vehicle use areas (drive aisle) to indicate a minimum 1.5 fc, as required by Table 1 of Ordinance 26, 2006. The applicant currently shows the minimum lighting level to be 1.0 fc. b. The applicant shall revise the lighting level of the vehicle use areas (parking spaces) to indicate a minimum 1.5 fc, as required by Table 1 of Ordinance 26, 2006. The applicant currently shows the minimum lighting level to be 0.8 fc. c. The applicant shall revise the lighting level of the pedestrian area (sidewalk) to indicate a minimum 1.0 fc, as required by Table 1 of Ordinance 26, 2006. The applicant currently shows the minimum lighting level to be 0.7 fc. 7. The applicant shall provide proposed spot lighting levels for the ground level building entry walks on the west and south side of the building consistent with those shown on the north side of the building. P:\PBGMEMO\4480\4480d.doc 1b( Monet Office Building Page 3 of 8 LBFH File No. 06 -4480 h C. 8. The applicant shall clarify the easement shown in the north drive lane of the south parking lot and on the west and north sides of the building, on the site plan (Sheet 1 of 2). The engineering plan (Sheet 1 of 1) does not show this easement beyond the proposed hydrant location west of the loading space. The applicant shall revise the plans for consistency per Section 78 -46 of the LDR. 9. The applicant shall indicate if the current access easement to the north to RCA Boulevard will be formally abandoned, as the applicant indicates that they do not intent to continue utilizing the easement. The applicant shall so indicate on the site plan. 10. The applicant shall provide a copy of the access easement proposed across the lands owned by others to the east per Section 78 -46 of the LDR. 11. The applicant shall show, label and dimension the existing and proposed easements on the engineering plan consistent with the boundary survey and site plan per Section 78 -46 of the LDR. 12. The applicant shall provide a stop bar, on the engineering plan, for west bound traffic in the north drive aisle of the south parking area consistent with the site plan per Section 78 -46 of the LDR. 13. The applicant should identify which, if any, existing trees are proposed to be removed or relocated, on the landscape plan per Section 78 -46 of the LDR. 14. We recommend that the applicant review the proposed location of the loading space, if the applicant desires to maintain the existing trees shown in that area. The applicant shows three 8" Oaks, one 12" Oak, one 15" Oak and one 17" Oak, on the landscape plan (Sheet 1 of 3), in the immediate area of the proposed loading space. 15. The applicant shall dimension the width of the planting islands on the site plan per Section 78 -46 of the LDR. 16. The applicant shall identify the handicap parking sign, on the site plan (Sheet 2 of 2), as a FIFP -20 -04 for conformance with FDOT Index 17355 per Section 78- 46 of the LDR. 17. The applicant shall show the emergency access route, on the site plan, through the parking lot per Section 78 -46 of the LDR. 18. The applicant shall clarify the entry area of the parcel. The boundary survey and the aerial photo show local cross traffic at the entrance. We question if a stop sign is required for exiting traffic from this parcel due to the traffic movements in the area. The applicant shall identify if stop signs currently exist for the north /south traffic at this location per Section 78 -46 of the LDR. PAPBGM EMO\4480 \4480d.doc Monet Office Building Page 4 of 8 Ib(h INc LBFH File No. 06 -4480 19. The applicant shall sign the loading area for conformance with Section 78 -363 of the LDR. 20. We recommend that the applicant show the stop sign in the south parking lot adjacent to the stop bar. 21. The applicant shall identify the existing/proposed off -site curb radii, per Section 78 -46 of the LDR, as it appears on the site plan that the curb will be modified for this development. 22. The applicant shall identify the existing and proposed curb types on the plan view per Section 78 -46 of the LDR. This shall include the off -site curb that is being connected. 23. The applicant shall identify the curb transitions on the plan view per Section 78 -46 of the LDR. Waiver Requests 1. The applicant is requesting a waiver from Section 78 -154 of the LDR, which requires a side yard building setback of 25 feet. The applicant proposes 20 feet from the front property line (on the east side of the building) to the staircase. Please note we remain in support of the City's LDR. 2. The applicant is requesting a waiver from Section 78 -315 of the LDR, which requires a landscape island be provided between every nine parking spaces. The applicant proposes the waiver for one location, in the south parking lot, where they desire to save an existing large tree. Please note we remain in support of the City's LDR. Non - Certification Issues NOTE: All engineering/infrastructure plans are considered conceptual during the planning and zoning review phase and are subject to further review during the final construction review. These non - certification comments shall be satisfied prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit. 1. The applicant shall dimension the engineering plan or provide a horizontal control plan, which provides "complete horizontal control of the project sufficient to construct the project and determine the dimensions of all site improvements" in accordance with Section 78 -448 of the LDR. 2. The applicant shall provide evidence that the existing drainage system will continue to provide the required level of service for the proposed project, as well as the existing drainage area that is currently being served by said drainage system. P:\PBGMEMO\4480\4480d.doc Monet Office Building Page 5 of 8 1b(h LB FH File No. 06 -4480 C. 3. The applicant shall label the handicap ramps, on the engineering plan, with the appropriate CR# per the 2006 FDOT Index 304. 4. The applicant shall submit signed and sealed drainage calculations (for pipe sizing), along with a drainage area map indicating the drainage area for each contributing structure, for the review of the City. 5. The applicant shall indicate the structural numbers for the `Asphalt Section (Typ.)' and the `Vehicular Concrete Pavers' section detail on the Engineering Detail Sheet in accordance with Section 78 -499 Table 41 of the LDR. The applicant shall provide a table indicating the layer, material, LBR/FBV, material thickness, FDOT layer coefficient; the SN for the pavement section, base section, and subgrade section; and the total SN for the total pavement section and the required SN in accordance with the FDOT Flexible Design Manual. Pavement Section Table Layer Material LBR / Material FDOT SN FBV Thickness Layer Coefficient Total SN Required SN 6. Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the applicant shall provide a copy of the following approved permits, as applicable: a. SFWMD b. NPBCID c. PBC d. FDOT e. PBC Health Department/FDEP f. NPDES 7. The applicant shall provide a cost estimate for the project, including public infrastructure and all landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the City in order to establish surety. The cost estimate shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and landscape architect registered in the state of Florida. Surety will be based on 110% of the total combined approved cost estimates and shall be posted with the City, prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit. P:\PBGMEMO\4480\4480d.doc Monet Office Building Page 6 of 8 lbfh LB FH File No. 06 -4480 C. SUMMARY OF ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE of Probable Construction Costs for On -site and Off -site Public Improvements Grading & Paving $ Sanitary Sewer $ Water Storm Water Maintenance $ Subtotal $ Landscaping Irrigation Subtotal Total 110 %Total Required Surety 8. The applicant shall provide a cost estimate for the on -site project improvements, not including public infrastructure, landscaping and irrigation costs (which were previously submitted by the applicant) for review and approval by the City. The cost estimate shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and shall be posted with the City prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit. SUMMARY OF ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE of Probable Construction Costs for On -site Non Public Improve ents Grading $ Sanitary Sewer $ Water Storm Water Maintenance $ Total $ Conditions of Approval 1. "Applicant shall copy to the City all permit applications, permits, certifications and approvals. " (City Engineer) 2. "Applicant shall provide all necessary construction zone signage and fencing as required by the City Engineer. " (City Engineer) 3. "Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit applicant shall provide a cost estimate for the project, including public infrastructure and all landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the City in order to establish surety. The cost estimate shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and landscape architect registered in the state of Florida. Surety will be based on 110% of the total combined approved cost estimates and shall be posted with the City, prior to the issuance P:\PBGMEMO\4480\4480d.doc Monet Office Building Page 7 of 8 L hINC. LBFH File No. 06 -4480 of the first building permit. In accordance with Section 78 -309 & 78 -461 of the LDR. " (City Engineer) 4. "Prior to issuance of the first land alteration permit, the applicant shall prepare a plat, which shall be approved by the City and recorded. " (City Engineer) 5. "Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, applicant shall provide cost estimates in accordance with LDR Section 78 -309 and 78 -461 and for on -site project improvements, not including public infrastructure, or landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the City. The cost estimates shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and landscape architect registered in the state of Florida and shall be posted with the City, prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit. " (City Engineer) 6. "The construction, operation and/or maintenance of any elements of the subject project shall not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage of surrounding areas. If, at any time during the project development, it is determined by the City that any of the surrounding areas are experiencing negative drainage impacts caused by the project, it shall be the applicant's responsibility to cure said impacts in a period of time and a manner acceptable to the City prior to additional construction activities. " (City Engineer) 7. "Prior to issuance of the first land alteration permit, applicant shall submit signed/sealed/dated construction plans (paving /grading /drainage and water /sewer) and all pertinent calculations for review and comment. " (City Engineer) 8. "Applicant shall comply with any and all Palm Beach County Traffic Division conditions. 9. "Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, applicant shall schedule a pre - permit meeting with City staff. " (City Engineer) 10. "Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit the applicant shall provide to the City letters of authorization from the applicable utility companies allowing landscaping and light poles to be placed within the utility easements. " (City Engineer) 11. "Applicant shall notify the City's Public Works Division at least 10 working days prior to the commencement of any work/construction activity within any public right -of -way within the City of Palm Beach Gardens. In the case of a city right -of -way, the applicant has at least five working days to obtain a right -of- way permit. Right -of -way permits may be obtained at the Building Division. Failure to comply with this condition could result in a Stop Work Order of all P:\PBGMEMO\4480\4480d.doc hINC. Monet Office Building LBFH File No. 06 -4480 Page 8 of 8 work/construction activity within the public right -of -way and the subject development site. " (Public Works) The applicant is requested to return a copy of our comments with the applicant's acknowledgement of each comment and the response. Compliance will expedite the subsequent review. The applicant is reminded that all submittals are to be made to the City of Palm Beach Gardens Growth Management Department. JATD /mef cc: Kara Irwin — Palm Beach Gardens (kirwin @pbgfl.com) Brad Wiseman —Palm Beach Gardens (bwiseman @pbgfl.com) Marty Minor — Urban Design Studio (mminor @udsonline.com) P:\PBGMEMO\4480\4480d.doc PALM BEACH GARDENS POLICE DEPARTMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS BUREAU INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: BRAD WISEMAN, PLANNING MANAGER FROM: OFFICER JULES BARONE SUBJECT: PUD- 06 -09- 000010 MONET OFFICE BULIDING DATE: OCTOBER 23, 2006 CPTED Compliance: Crime Prevention Through Environment is a branch of situational crime prevention that maintains the basic premise that the physical environment can be designed or manipulated to produce behavioral effects that will reduce the incident and fear of crime. The police department has reviewed the site plan and strongly recommends the following minimum conditions be met. Comments: I. Applicant shall provide a detailed Photometric Lighting Plan with types and location of lights before the issuance of a building permit. 1. Metal Halide lighting shall be used for all street and pedestrian walkways utilizing 12' light poles. • Lighting locations should not conflict with landscaping, (to include long term tree canopy growth). • Provide timer clock /photo cell lighting for nighttime use above or near entryways and all exits including emergency exits. 2. Building lighting shall be around perimeter of all sides and on pedestrian sidewalk surrounding the building. Non - glare lighting shall be used. 3. Landscaping shall not obstruct view from windows or walkways. 4. Directory shall be placed at the ingress point and strategically place directory with arrow indicator for building at vehicle driver sight level. 5. Commercial numbering system: • Shall be illuminated for night time visibility, (photo cell) and not be obstructed by landscaping. • Shall be placed at multiple locations, front and rear of buildings, twelve inch Arabic numerals. • Should have bi- directional visibility from the roadway. II. Natural Surveillance 1. Provide landscaping that does not create hiding spaces. 2. Provide clearly marked transitional zones that indicate movement from public to semipublic through use of brick pavers. 3. Windows and exterior doors should be visible from parking area. 4. Parking spaces should be assigned to each employee and visitor. 5. Parking areas should be visible from windows. 6. Allow shrubbery to be no more than three feet high for clear visibility in vulnerable areas. III. Dumpsters: Enclosures should not allow for easy concealment. Large enough to accommodate Should not be located in public area. IV. Loading Zone /Area • With designated delivery hours, should be separate from public parking. • Loading area should not create dead end or blind spot. V. All Structures should be target hardened, to include but not limited to: • Buildings shall be pre -wired for an alarm system. • Doors shall be equipped with metal plate over thresh- hold of the locking mechanism. • Rear door shall have 180 degree peephole viewers or window. • Case hardened commercial grade dead bolt locks shall be installed on all exterior doors with minimum of one inch throw. • Door hinges shall be installed on interior side of door or tamper - proof hinges used. • Bicycle racks should be placed in close proximity to buildings and not in parking lots. • Overhead door access at rear of buildings shall be pre -wired for alarm system. • Elevator doors shall have glass panel inserts to provide natural surveillance for users. Provide tenants with user codes for elevator operation during non - business hours. • Enhance natural surveillance of restrooms by placing them in central areas and reduce number of tenants sharing a common restroom. install maze entrances; avoid double door entry systems. • Due to the isolated location of site it is strongly recommended a digital CCTV system be installed to monitor all pedestrian activity. 2 CPTED CONDITIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE CRIMES CPTED Conditions of approval: 1. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official. a. The developer /project manager after site clearing and placement of construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers, construction /visitor pass, reduce /minimize entry /exit points, encourage sub contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and /or any other measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working environment. b. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout the construction phase of the project. Non - compliance with the approved plan shall result in a stop -work order for the entire planned unit development. cc: Chief S. Stepp Major R. Artola Major R. Facchine Capt. A. Wesenick Accreditation Files 3 CIS OF PALM BEACH GARDENS 10500 N. MILITARY TRAIL PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410 -4698 FIRE RESCUE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Marrero, Principal Planner DATE: October 16, 2006 APPROVED: FROM: Scott Fetterman, Deputy Chief<- RE: PPUD- 06 -09- 000010: Monet Office Building Fire Rescue has reviewed the above referenced PUD petition and has the following comments and concerns: • Fire Rescue can not turn around in the south parking area. Fire Rescue requires a 45'outside radius while maintaining a 20' inside radius to turn around. The applicant is only providing 85' between the rows of parking which is not sufficient. The minimum would be 90' based on the 45' radius. • The engineering plan is not consistent with the site plan in reference to the proposed water distribution. The applicant needs to indicate which plan is accurate for review. Thank you for your assistance and consideration in this matter. Please contact me if you have any questions. CITY OF PALM BCH GDNS C,r'T 1 X006 PLANNING &ZONING DIV 49k EXECUTIVE OFFICE October 18, 2006 Seacoast Utility Authority MP.O. Box 109602 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 -9602 Mr. Richard Marrero Planning & Zoning Division City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 North Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 RE: Monet Office Building Dear Mr. Marrero: We offer the following comments on your transmittal dated September 15, 2006 concerning the referenced project. 1. The applicant needs to revise the site plan and landscape plans to clearly depict the existing 8" gravity sewer line running adjacent to the north and west property lines as well as the Seacoast easement (ORB 5880 Pg 1756) and the utility easement (ORB 3647 Pg 810). 2. The applicant needs to revise the survey of the property to properly depict the Seacoast easement (ORB 5880 Pg 1756) and the utility easement (ORB 3647 Pg 810). 3. The applicant needs to address fire flow requirements for the project. 4. The applicant needs to revise the landscape plans so that the location of proposed water and sewer lines and respective easements correspond to the location shown on the preliminary engineering plans. Please call if you require additional information. Sincerely, YCOASTUTILITY AUTHORITY ZL Br Director of Operations dp cc: R. Bishop J. Callaghan J. Dye J. Lance CITY GP PRIM BCH GDNS OCT 201 PLANNING &ZONING DO 4200 Hood Road, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 -2198 Phone: Customer Service (561) 627 -2920 / Executive Office (561) 627 -2900 / FAX (561) 624 -2839 www.sua.com DRC Meeting MONET OFFICE BUILDING Date: 1111612006 Urban Design Studio Time: 1:00 .m. NAM COMPANY / DEPT Ur, LL (�- M I 1 "&A S A J i t-k7'r 4' Ui'\ ,-TC;r o l%Ti• P-4#b4J 11v1U S GI - Gos C- ,/tea; -�E- - 6-11-1 rj-ffPm0 Z6 �c _ Land Development Regulations Sec. 78 -44 DRC review. The Growth Management department shall forward the completed application to the members of the DRC, who shall review the application and shall submit their comments and recommendations to the growth management department director not less than 14 working days following receipt of the complete application. Incomplete submittals by applicants, review of environmental factors, lack of or incomplete responses to requests for additional information, complexity of the application, or need for additional information may delay the DRC review and comments. (Ord. No. 17- 2000, § 22, 7- 20 -00) �• \� Memo to File From: Aries Page, GIS Manager Subject: PPUD- 06 -09 -10 Monet Office Building Date: November 16, 2006 I have reviewed the above - referenced application and provide the following comments for the DRC meeting: 1. Prior to the scheduling of P &Z, the applicant shall work with the City's GIS Department to resolve addressing issues with the proposed site. With the abandonment of 26`h Terr. North, a new address must be given to the site as well as a roadway name for the ingress /egress of the site. Also, please understand that additional information may be requested, and staff may have additional comments as the review process continues.