HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z 062700• CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING AND ZONING CON IISSION
June 27, 2000
MINUTES
The Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Palm Beach Gardens,
Florida, was called to order by Chair Joel Channing at 6:30 P.M. in the Lobby of the Municipal Complex,
10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to
the Flag.
ITEMS BY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR
Principal Planner Tim Norquest announced that alternate Barry Present would now be a regular member
of the Commission; and that Mr. Cruz would be leaving the Commission since he had accepted a job
transfer to the west coast. Mr. Norquest provided a written summary to each Commission member of
action taken at the June 15, 2000 City Council meeting, which included approval of the City Centre
Parcel F project and the Admiralty U project. Mr. Norquest commented that the City Council had been
taking a harder look at requests for waivers and that the new Land Development Regulations would
contain more specific criteria for granting waivers. Mr. Norquest questioned what the Commission's
intent had been in their discussions regarding single entity retail use in the PGA Corridor overlay. The
consensus of the Commission was to discuss this issue at the end of the meeting.
• APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mr. Solomon made a motion to approve the June 13, 2000 meeting minutes. Mr. Present seconded the
motion. Motion carried by unanimous 6 -0 vote.
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
The roll was called by Betty Laur, Secretary for the meeting.
Present Absent
John Glidden, Chair Pro Tem. Joel Channing
John Nedvins, Vice Chair Daniel Lee Cruz
Dennis Solomon
Craig Kunkle, Jr.
Barry Present
Ted Rauch, Alternate- arrived at 7 :41 p.m.
Also present at the meeting were City Attorney Leonard Rubin, Senior Planner Ed Tombari, Principal
• Planners James Norquest and Steve Cramer, and Planners John Lindgren and Debra Northsea.
• Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 27, 2000
Public Hearing
Petition WAY- 00 -02; Parking and Stora ge of a Watercraft at 4307 Crestdale Street
Mr. David H. Saikley, as the owner of residential property at 4307 Crestdale Street, is requesting a
waiver from the City's parking and storage requirements for recreational vehicles and watercraft.
Principal Planner Tim Norquest presented the petition and distributed to the Board photographs of the
subject property. Mr. Norquest stated that staf'recommended denial because the intent ofthe ordinance
was to prevent parking in front yards of houses, and it would be difficult for the required criteria to be
met.
Petitioner David H. Saikley explained he had spent money to have a concrete pad installed when he
bought the boat, and had owned the boat for the entire time he had lived there. Mr. Salley explained
that he had received the original notice and had understood he would be grandfathered in. The
petitioner explained that he had never received any other communication, and therefore did not know he
had been required to obtained a sticker. After over two years he was being cited, which he felt was
unfair. Principal Planner Norquest explained that notice had been through advertising.
Vice Chair Nedvins declared the public hearing open. Dallas Durrance, Dawn Ridge Street, was in favor
• of granting the variance. Dwane Connley, 4306 Crestdale, was in favor of granting the waiver. Patricia
Winner, 4321 Crestdale, was in favor of granting the waiver. Hearing no further comments from the
public, Vice Chair Nedvins declared the public hearing closed. City Attorney Leonard Rubin read into
the record two criteria which the Board must consider in making a decision. Vice Chair Nedvins
commented he had visited the neighborhood and felt granting the waiver would not be a detriment to the
neighborhood. Mr. Solomon verified with the City Attorney that it was the petitioner's burden to provide
proof and asked for the opinion of one of the neighbors who had spoken regarding whether the two
criteria had been met. Dallas Durrance stated his opinion that no one would have concerns and that this
would not be a detriment. Mr. Present questioned whether the petitioner would be granted the same
rights as the others who had obtained a permit, to which the City Attorney responded affirmatively, and
explained that the waiver would apply to this specific boat.
Mr. Kunkle made a motion to approve Petition WAV- 00-02. Mr. Present seconded the motion,
which carried by unanimous 6-0 vote.
SITE PLAN & APPEARANCE REVIEW COAUM TEE
The roll was called by Betty Laur, Secretary for the meeting.
• 2
• Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 27, 2000
Pre sent Absent
John Glidden, Chair Pro Tem Joel Channing
John Nedvins, Vice Chair Daniel Lee Cruz
Dennis Solomon
Craig Kunkle, Jr.
Barry Present
Ted Rauch, Alternate
Petition SP -00-IO
Skateboard Park at Plant Drive Park
Sue Miller, acting as agent for City of Palm Beach Gardens Parks and Recreation Department, is
requesting approval for a Skateboard Park within the City's existing Plant Drive Park at Lilac Street
and Plant Drive. The site, of appraximately 0.95 acres, is located within the southwest portion of the
park, which is 8.26 total acres. (12- 42S -42E)
Planner Debra Northsea presented the petition and noted that the project had been designed by Tim
Payne, a world - renowned designer of these types of facilities. Architect Rick Logan reviewed the
• architecture, and explained that the entire facility would be fenced in and bermed, with a hedge on the
south side. A few trees would be included in the landscaping. There would be only one entry/exit,
illumination would be provided on 40' high light poles to allow use at night, and the facility would be used
by both skateboarders and roller bladers. Mr. Logan noted that this would be a world -class park and that
the kids were really excited. Sue Miller, agent, explained that the facility would be staffed and
supervised„ and that the City had learned from mistakes made by the City Boca Raton, which had a
similar facility. Mr. Solomon inquired as to the height of the fence, hours of operation, and rules and
regulations. Ms. Miller explained that the fence was 6' high, that hours would be after school until
approximately 9:30 p.m., and on weekends possibly 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. Ms. Miller commented that rules
and regulations would be geared toward safety, and that safety equipment would be required, and that
possibly clinic sessions would be held for each age group. Disclaimer language would be included in
contracts and rules would be posted on signage. In case of accidents, 911 would be called. Ms. Miller
explained that Boca Raton had put the skateboarders and rollerbladers together and some oftheir ramps
were too steep for the skateboards; and that their facility was smaller. Mr. Rauch questioned whether
shows would be held, to which Ms. Miller responded there were no such plans at this time; however, the
City did have moveable bleachers which could be placed outside the fencing. Mr. Glidden expressed
concern with the proximity to the baseball field and stated it was imperative to have a high net in Phase
I in case a lime drive was hit into the area. Ms. Miller noted that net had not been included in the Phase
I budget. Mr. Glidden indicated he would only support the petition ifnetting was included. Mr. Glidden
noted that 5' -6' feet of clear area was needed outside the park so that a person could walk around the
baseball field without running into a fence. Ms. Miller reported that $250,000 had been approved and
that the City was hoping to involve designer Tim Payne in the construction. Mr. Logan described the
0 3
• Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 27, 2000
construction. Ms. Miller explained that the teen center was a game room which would be air
conditioned, and bathrooms were in a separate building, in between which would be a tent to provide
shelter from the sun. Mr. Nedvins suggested a first aid station be set up and that the staff be trained in
first aid procedures. Ms. Miller explained there would be resident and non - resident fees and
memberships, and that anticipated opening was March, 2001. Mr. Payne's advice would be sought as to
the maximum number the facility could accommodate.
Mr. Solomon made a motion to recommend to the City Council approval of Petition SP400 -10 with
the following conditions:
1. A perimeter hedge will be required at the south property line along the fenced area of the
proposed skatepark.
2. Prior to the construction review process, the following items will need to be addressed or
provided to staff:
a) Proposed and existing site lighting with photometrics needs to be provided;
b) Addition of the following site plan elements:
• Drainage system
• Light poles
• 0 Signage location
• Proposed landscaping (hedge only; cabals to be removed from plan)
• 2 to 1 slope berm adjacent to retaining wall needs to be reduced to 4 to 1
slope
• Phasing line needs to be added to the hatched area, and base contract
construction line needs to be clarified
3. Fencing shall be provided to screen for protection from baseballs.
4. The City Attorney shall provide documents for users to sign in terms of waiving liability
in addition to the posted signage.
5. Staff shall be on duty to supervise activity during all hours facility is open.
Mr. Glidden seconded the motion and proposed an amendment to establish the minimum height
of the netting above the baseball fence at 16' to 20' or higher if determined by staff; and to provide
6' clear passage around the baseball field. Mr. Solomon accepted the amendments. Motion
carried by unanimous 6-0 vote.
Petition SP- 00 -01:
Burma Road Commerce Park Minor Site Plan Review
• 4
• Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 27, 2000
Richard Sun, agent for John C. Bills, is requesting minor site plan approval for two ojficeIretail
buildings. The site is located approximately 118 of a mile south of Northlake Boulevard, on the east
side of Burma Roam The 2.29 -acre site will contain 7,300 square feet of retail space and 15,430
square feet of office space (totaling 22,730 square feet). (7- 42S -43E)
Planner John Lindgren reviewed the staff report and explained that this was a minor site plan review
which required review by only the Site Plan & Appearance Review Committee.
Richard Sun, agent, announced that the property had been sold and the current owner was Sabatello
Construction of Florida. Mr. Sun presented the petition, described the architectural style as
Mediterranean with a residential look, reviewed proposed screening from adjacent properties, described
landscaping, and noted that the buildings were to be used by multiple tenants. Mr. Sun stated that the
petitioner took exception to the lighting condition proposed by staff because if the neighbors objected
to the lighting it could be very costly to make changes. Mr. Sun indicated that the petitioner agreed to
the other seven conditions. Mr. Sun provided a sample board of materials and colors. The walkway at
the rear of Building A was clarified as going all the way around, and the walkway locations were
identified. Mr. Lindgren explained that the code requirement for foundation landscaping was 5' depth
ofplanting required for a one -story building. Mr. Sun noted that the code made an exception when space
was required for loading and allowed the planting to be moved; and that the proposed hedge was out 15'
• at the rear to allow loading at the rear of the buildings. The foundation plantings were discussed. Mr.
Glidden expressed concern with the dead -end parking and questioned why one entrance could not be
moved. Mr. Sun responded that 100' was required to be maintained between drives. The lighting
condition was discussed. Mr. Lindgren explained that Sean Donahue, engineer for the City, wanted the
condition in order to safeguard residents across Burma Road from light spill, and the proposed condition
allowed flexibility to check the lighting and if there were complaints from the neighbors to adjust the
lighting at a later date. Mr. Sun expressed concern that the parking requirements were just met and there
was no additional space, noted that light levels along Burma were close to the code requirement, and
expressed fear that lighting changes could be costly. Discussion ensued. It was the consensus of the
Committee to eliminate the lighting condition.
Mr. Solomon made a motion to approve Petition SP -00-01 as submitted with the following
conditions:
1. The permitted uses for this site shall be those permitted in the General Commercial (CG1)
zoning district except for dental and medical offices. No dental or medical offices shall be
permitted on this site. (Planning & Zoning)
2. The total amount of retail space on this site shall not exceed 7,300 square feet. (Planning
& Zoning)
3. Both buildings on site shall have fire -rated walls and/or sprinkler systems, per the approval
of the City's Fire Marshal. (Fire Department)
4. Prior to construction plan approval, the applicant shall revise the plans to modify the "5-
• 5
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 27, 2000
foot Striped Access Aisle" between the two buildings to show the sidewalk crossing after
the stop sign. (City Engineering)
5. Prior to the final certificate of occupancy, all structures within proximity of the drainage
system, including but not limited to landscaping and light poles, shall be field verified to
avoid conflicts. (City Engineering)
6. Prior to construction plan approval, the applicant shall revise the paving, grading and
drainage plan to show the landscape berm on the western boundary of the site. (City
Engineering)
7. Upon approval of the development order, the applicant shall secure a "Seacoast Utility
Authority Capacity Allocation Commitment for Public Water and/or Sewer Service,"
which shall be verified by the delivery of a fully executed copy of the document to the
Planning & Zoning Division within 30 days of granting of the development order.
(Planning & Zoning)
Mr. Kunkle seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 6-0 vote.
Petition SP -00.11:
Golf Digest Maintenance Building
Urban Design Studio, agent for Taylor Woodrow, is requesting site plan approval for a golf course
• maintenance facility on 218 acres. The site is located within the Golf Digest Planned Community
District (PCD), and is appra dmately 112 mile south of the intersection of Hood Road and Jog Road
(7- 42S -43E)
Senior Planner Ed Tombari reviewed the staff report and the requested waivers, for which approval was
recommended. There were no comments from the Committee.
Mr. Present made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of Petition SP400-11 with the
following conditions:
1. Prior to construction plan approval, Jog Road shall be platted and dedicated to Palm
Beach County, or if an alternate temporary entrance is planned, the access easement will
need to be in place prior to construction plan approval.
2. Prior to construction plan approval, the applicant shall provide a letter of authorization
from the appropriate utility owners allowing landscaping and paving within their
respective utility easements.
3. The following waivers shall be granted:
a) From Section 118- 475(a) to allow for 9' x 18.5' parking spaces
• 6
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 27, 2000
b) From Section 118 -539 to allow for no bicycle parking.
C) From Section 119474 to allow for no parking or pedestrian lighting.
d) From Section 118- 211(gx2) side setback for Public/Institutional zoning district.
Mr. Glidden seconded the motion. Ann Booth, agent for the petitioner, stated the petitioner had
no objections. Motion carried by unanimous 6-0 vote.
Petition SP- 00 -03:
Ballenlsles Parcel 23
Urban Design Studio, agent for Ballenlsles Development Company, is requesting approval for a site
plan within a Planned Community District (PCD) to construct 112 condominium units in 28
buildings. The 22.84 -acre site is located within the Ballenlsles PCD adjacent to the western side of
military Trail, approximately 112 mile north of Northlake Boulevard (13- 42S -42E)
Senior Planner Ed Tombari reviewed the staffreport, explained there would be one color scheme instead
ofthree, requested the petitioner address Seacoast Utility concerns, and recommended approval with two
conditions and one waiver.
Ann Booth, agent for the petitioner, presented a power point presentation of the site plan, in which she
• reviewed parking, mailboxes, sidewalks, access to neighborhood park, setbacks, landscaping, control
structure and maintenance oflake, architecture, colors, and the recreation building, and stated agreement
with the conditions of approval proposed by staff Ms. Booth explained that parking allowed for the
maximum that could be required if every unit was built with the maximum number of bedrooms; that
there would be a bike path connecting the two elements of the property; that not many school age
children were anticipated since the units would be marked as second homes; that there would be separate
units upstairs and downstairs; and that Ballenlsles maintained the PCD buffers and roadway landscaping.
Mr. Solomon requested that the condominium documents be reviewed by the City Attorney. Mr.
Solomon commented there should have been a pedestrian bridge over the water to link the two pods to
the recreation building. Ms. Booth responded that the cost would have been prohibitive. Steve
Romanowski with Vintage Properties advised the cost would have been approximately $300,000. Mr.
Rauch agreed with Mr. Solomon that a walkway was needed, but not necessarily a bridge. Mr. Glidden
received clarification that in each building eight cars could park in the garage and eight in the driveway
and that the only additional parking was at the end ofthe cul -de -sacs and mailbox clusters. Mr. Nedvins
expressed concern with a dead end, which Ms. Booth explained was only a turnaround.
Mr. Glidden made a motion to recommend to the City Council approval of SP -00-05 with the
following conditions:
1. The petitioner shall revise site and landscape plans to the satisfaction of Seacoast Utility
Authority, prior to scheduling for City Council approval.
• 7
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 27, 2000
2. Prior to the 20th Certificate of Occupancy, the Master Developer shall work with the City
to develop and install a new irrigation and electrical system to supply water and uplighting
to the three medians on Military Trail east of Parcels 25b and 23. Once irrigation and
electrical systems are installed, the master developer shall install landscaping and
uplighting per the median design plan provided by the City.
3. The following waiver shall be granted:
Section 118-214(8) and 118- 200(g)(3), which require that homes within a Planned
Community District (PCD) meet side facing street setbacks.
Mr. Present seconded the motion. Mr. Solomon and Mr. Rauch commented that there should
have been a pedestrian bridge crossing the water. Motion carried 5-1, with W. Solomon voting
against the motion.
Petition SP- 00-07:
Eckerd's at Gardens East Plaza (Promenade)
Urban Design Studio, agentfor Gardens East Plaza, LTD, is requesting an amendment to an existing
Planned Unit Development approval to add a 14,090 square foot retail building (Eckerd's Drugstore)
on Parcels 1, 2, and 3 in the Promenade Plaza Shopping Center (fka. Gardens East Plaza), within
the Gardens East Planned Community District. The 1.67 -acre site is located on the east side of
Alternate AIA, approximately 500 feet north of Lighthouse Drive. (7- 42, -43E)
Mr. Glidden stepped down due to conflict of interest.
Planner John Lindgren reviewed the staff report and requested waivers, and stated staff did not support
waiver number two, which was a request for an additional ground sign.
Dodi Glas, Urban Design Studio, agent for the Petitioner, reviewed the Master Site Plan, conditions for
the master plan, and changes since the last meeting. Ms. Glas described architectural changes and
commented that the photometric plan was acceptable except under the canopy where maximum
footcandles were requested for safety for the pharmacy. A suggestion was made to tie the remaining
parcel one tower feature to redevelopment ofparcel 9 (theater site). Sidewalks had been added, and the
petitioner indicated they would agree to do landscaping and the hardscape with this approval. Additional
parking spaces were proposed at the rear of the theater. Additional landscaping had been added, as well
as a trellis feature. Mr. Solomon commented that the arches were a unifying theme with the shopping
center, and proposed that the teal color be used in the Eckerd's budding. Mr. Solomon noted that the
east and west sides of elevations had been mislabeled on sheet A3, which was verified by the petitioner.
Mr. Solomon suggested that the architectural concept could be carried through on the east side of the
• 8
•
•
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 27, 2000
building. The petitioner presented a view from Alternate AIA to show that the rollup door was not very
visible since it was offset and there was a landscaping buffer. Mr. Solomon stated he had no problem
with the photometrics but did not favor the extra ground sign. Ms. Glas verified that the petitioner
believed the theater parcel would be redeveloped within the next five years, and explained that she
believed an additional eight parking spaces would be realized with the present proposed improvements.
Mr. Lindgren commented that the overall parking was 23 spaces over the required amount. Mr. Nedvins
requested parking numbers for the next meeting and confirmation from staffthat the lighting levels were
acceptable. Mr. Kunkle commented he was comfortable with the proposed landscaping. Mr. Nedvins
requested that the design of the proposed arches be as close to the existing arches as possible. The
consensus ofthe Committee was that they would not grant a waiver for a seventh ground sign. Ms. Glas
explained that the areas where reduction of landscape buffers were proposed would still have more than
existed at the present time. The Committee was in agreement to grant the waiver for reduction of
landscape buffers. The waiver for reduction ofparking stall sizes was discussed. Mr. Lindgren explained
that the petitioner had to show they could meet the code required 10' spaces. Vice Chair Nedvins
commented the Committee would probably grant that waiver. Mr. Lindgren explained that the Police
Department supported the higher number of footcandles in the canopy area only. Discussion ensued
regarding where the tower feature might be connected, which Mr. Lindgren explained was proposed for
the future but staff preferred it be built now. Vice Chair Nedvins requested a footprint be presented at
the next meeting to show where the tower could be connected. Mr. Nedvins summarized that for the
next meeting Mr. Lindgren would confirm parking, a footprint of the tower layout would be provided,
and that, assuming the City Engineer approved, the lighting waiver would be granted, the ground sign
waiver would not be granted, the waiver for landscaping would be granted, and the Committee would
vote in favor of 9 -1 /2' parking spaces. Mr. Solomon favored picking up the teal color in signage, to
which Ms. Glas responded the outparcels had different colors in their signs and that she would bring
photographs of the signs to the next meeting. Mr. Solomon requested teal be used anyway. A
representative from Oliver Glidden Group indicated that the tower would have to be freestanding. It was
noted that the Committee might accept a condition to build the tower with redevelopment ofparcel nine.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
The roll was called by Betty Laur, Secretary for the meeting.
Present
John Glidden, Chair Pro Tem
John Nedvins, Vice Chair
Dennis Solomon
Craig Kunkle, Jr.
Barry Present
Ted Rauch, Alternate
L"
Absent
Joel Charming
Daniel Lee Cruz
• Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 27, 2000
Workshop
Petition PUD- 99-08: Parcel 4.05 The Isles
Cotleur& Hearing, agentforDiVosta & Company, is requ esting Planned Unit Development approval
to construct 423 residential units on 180 acres of land on the north side of Hood Road between
Military Trail and Alternate AIA. The site will also contain a town center with a 1,176 square foot
general store, a 2,550 square foot town hall, a 1,500 square foot fitness center, a 1,600 square-foot
sgimming pool, four tennis courts, and a 400 square foot maintenance building. (7-42S-43E)
Planner John Lindgren presented the staff report and noted outstanding issues. Rick Green, Vice
President of DiVosta & Company, presented a power point presentation which highlighted the master
plan and site plan features, including a town center to serve only this community, easements, a 6' high
wall on the east side to screen noise from trains and traffic, possible future connection to Alternate AIA,
meandering sidewalk along Military Trail, landscape buffers along Hood Road, medians on Military Trail,
and concurrency approvals. Mr. Green described the three types ofproducts to be offered- single family
attached (Capri), single family zero lot lime (Oakmont), and a larger single family zero lot lime (Carlyle).
Mr. Green explained that all residents would go to the town center to get their mail. Mr. Green requested
waivers for various setbacks and lot coverages, explained that as a compromise to littoral plantings,
plantings would be provided at the entrance to the lakes and the overhead utility lines along Plat 4 would
• be placed underground. Mr. Green commented that the petitioner would like to start the town center
immediately, before 25% of the residential units were complete. Mr. Green presented justification for
requested waivers, comparing The Isles with The Oaks where many of the requested waivers had been
granted Various views of The Oaks were shown to depict how The Isles would look. Vice Chair
Nedvins commented that the meat of the request was the waivers, and expressed his opinion that the
changes to smaller lot sizes, minimum side widths, maximum building lot coverages, open space, and the
maximum building height for the towers were significant. Mr. Kunkle indicated agreement with the
proposed compromise to littoral plantings and that the benefit of the petitioner's offer to bury overhead
wires was acceptable. Mr. Kunkle stated he had no problem with the petitioner starting construction of
the town center soon. Mr. Solomon indicated that he did have a problem with early construction because
of possible use of the town center gas station from outside the community, and noted that there was
public use of a similar facility at Ibis. Mr. Rauch agreed with the petitioner and expressed no problem
with early construction of the town center. Mr. Present commented if the petitioner wanted to take the
risk of building the town center first it did not concern him. Mr. Present questioned the wells proposed
by Seacoast Utility, to which Mr. Green responded that more information had been requested from
Seacoast since the petitioner was concerned the wells would cause drawdown from the lakes Mr.
Kunkle indicated he had no problems with the tower height, littoral plantings, or starting construction
of the town center; however, was concerned about the setbacks and variances requested and would not
support them. Mr. Green advised that zero lot line buildings were not currently addressed in the code,
which was why the requested waivers appeared to be so lengthy. Mr. Solomon stated he had a problem
with all the waivers except the tower height, and noted that SWA trucks would have to back up since
there was not sufficient turning room in the cul -de -sacs. Mr. Green explained that the petitioner had
• 10
• Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 27, 2000
coordinated with SWA and residents would bring their trash to a central area to be picked up, which
would be stated in the homeowners documents. Mr. Solomon expressed concern there was no
neighborhood park, and no guest parking except around the town center, and expressed his opinion that
design work in terms ofthe site plan was needed. Mr. Rauch agreed with Mr. Kunkle and Mr. Solomon
about the building lot coverages but had no problemwith the other issues. Mr. Rauch indicated he would
like a little more elbow room, and a park and open space. Mr. Solomon commented he did not have a
good feel for how many different elevations there were of each product. Mr. Green explained that there
was variety and different colors within each category and that the developer made a designation plan in
advance of sales. Mr. Solomon suggested that the City might like to see that designation plan. Mr.
Solomon suggested plantings within the lake maintenance area, to which Mr. Green responded that the
City Engineer was against that. Mr. Solomon questioned whether it had been considered to open the
connection to Alternate AIA or to have an access through the Seacoast site. Mr. Green advised
regarding the difficulty in obtaining passage over the railroad track and expressed his opinion that he did
not believe Seacoast would allow a roadway through their site. Mr. Glidden expressed no problem with
the tower height or proceeding with the town center. Mr. Glidden commented that study of the setback
comparison to the Oaks was needed to understand the impact of the variance requests, and strongly
suggested that the petitioner provide comparison to other projects they had done in the recent past.
Lack of code requirements for zero lot line homes was questioned, to which Principal Planner Steve
Cramer responded the City Council preferred to have the waivers, which was a policy decision. Mr.
• Glidden requested a roof plan for the clubhouse and full size drawings. Mr. Glidden expressed his
opinion the Capri model should have a raised entry, but stated the present design was not a problem Mr.
Glidden requested a plan that was color coded for the different products, and requested that the design
plan addressing the different elevations be done now or at least one pod of each to demonstrate the
variety. Mr. Glidden noted that language could be crafted to assure variety instead of leaving it to
chance. In response to Mr. Glidden's question regarding a future connection to Florida Boulevard, Mr.
Green explained that the petitioner had left room for a connection if the City wanted one in the future,
however, the City recognized that the feasibility of ever extending the roadway connection was slim. Mr.
Glidden expressed concern regarding getting out onto Military Trail in the morning rush hour traffic to
go south. Mr. Green explained he did not believe there were sufficient warrants for a traffic light but
would look into the matter. Mr. Solomon questioned staff as to whether there was any problem with
the distance of the road before coming to a turnaround, to which Principal Planner Norquest responded
there was no rule because this was not a dead end road. Mr. Present suggested looking into crossing
over to Florida Boulevard and either making it happen or closing it off forever, instead of coming in later
and trying to do it. Mr. Norquest explained that it was almost impossible to get a crossing approved by
the FEC railroad, so the City looked at the possibility of taking advantage of a connection in the future.
Mr. Present suggested tying this community to the one to the south; however, was advised that those
residents did not want the roadway through their property. Mr. Present suggested another entry off
Hood Road. Mr. Green explained that WCI planned to widen Hood Road, and that emergency access
was provided to The Isles off Military Trail Mr. Present replied that he was thinking of more than just
emergencies. Vice Chair Nedvins summarized the comments of the Commission, stating that there were
no problems with early construction of the town center, lack of littoral plantings, or the building height
0 11
• Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 27, 2000
ofthe tower. More information was needed regarding the Seacoast Utility wells and whether they would
affect the water table, causing drawdown of the lakes. Vice Chair Nedvins commented with regard to
the requested setback waivers that density came to mind, and advised the petitioner to be prepared with
a fallback position; to show comparison with setbacks in other projects; to provide layouts of different
models to show how they would interact with each other; plus full size plans and colored drawings; to
show differences between landscaping, screen enclosures, etc. Vice Chair Nedvins expressed concern
with granting these kinds of waivers and allowing too many units on a site. Mr. Green commented that
the petitioner was trying to provide a unique project and asked the Commission to keep in mind that
density was only 2.35, and the petitioner had scaled back a lot. Mr. Nedvins responded that with units
only 10 feet apart, air conditioning units bothered neighbors; and cautioned the petitioner to be prepared
for the next Board. The petitioner was advised that one more workshop meeting would be held.
OLD BUSINESS
There was no old business to come before the Commission.
NEW BUSINESS
• Reorganization ofthe Planning and Zoning Commission was discussed. It was pointed out that the Vice
Chair automatically acted as Chair for the next year.
Mr. Nedvins nominated W. Glidden as Vice Chair for the coming year. The nomination was
seconded by Mr. Kunkle, and carried by unanimous 6-0 vote.
Mr. Glidden nominated Mr. Solomon as Chair Pro Tem for the coming year. The nomination was
seconded by Mr. Present, and carried by unanimous 6-0 vote.
Principal Planner Norquest questioned what the Commission's intent had been in their discussions
regarding single entity retail use in the PGA Corridor overlay-Whether they had 'intended only typical out
parcel buildings such as banks, or larger buildings, such as a bookstore. Discussion ensued. Mr.
Norquest explained that it was difficult to accomplish making a smaller building look like it had more than
one user. Mr. Norquest explained that the City had been approached with a parcel that would be more
like a traditional shopping center and staff was looking at it in the context of single entity retail. Mr.
Kunkle commented that could work well, but the Commission needed to see the project. Mr. Solomon
expressed his opinion that the Commission would not want Gardens Mall to look like every other
shopping center with outparcels, but that could work in areas outside Gardens Mall. Mr. Norquest
commented that the Commission was saying to take these type projects on a case -by -case basis.
Discussion ensued regarding the County's limit on the number of outparcels allowed in a tract. Mr.
Glidden proposed that outparcels not exceed 20% of a site. It was pointed out that Promenade and other
• 12
. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 27, 2000
locations on PGA Boulevard had a lot of outparcels. Mr. Norquest explained there was no language in
the PGA overlay requirements that would permit the City to say no, and the City's consultant had not
set a minimum or maximumnumber. Mr. Glidden recommended Consultant Marty Hodgkins ofDuncan
Associates be contacted to see if other municipalities had already addressed this and what language they
had used. Mr. Glidden commented that the Commission could agree on approximate criteria so that staff
could advise applicants what the Commission would probably favor, and then the figures could be worked
out in each situation, so that it could be handled administratively. Mr. Norquest advised he would contact
Duncan Associates, and that the land development regulations were about to go to print. Mr. Glidden
expressed his opinion that this would be better handled administratively. Mr. Solomon requested staff
also check on allowing 20% per site.
Mr. Solomon questioned what had been done regarding the adult entertainment issue. Principal Planner
Steve Cramer advised that had been left as it currently existed, which was to allow adult entertainment
only in the CD2 zoning district as a conditional use, and that the only parcel zoned CD2 within the City
was the site where ABC Liquors was currently located.
ITEMS BY CITY COUNCIL. LIAISON
• There were no items by the City Council Liaison.
• 13
• Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 27, 2000
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:33 p.m. The next regular meeting will
be held July 11, 2000.
APPROVED:
•
JdI(n Nedvins, Chair
� 5*/ age
Jklin CXdden, Vice Chair
Dennis Solomon, 'Chair Pro Tem
MA
Ted Rauch, Alternate
{Absent)
Daniel Lee Cruz
Betty Laur
Secretary for the Meeting
•
14
FORM 813 MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR
COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
ST NAME - FIRST NAME - MIDDLE NAME
NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE
:IDDEN, JOHN Stii'ER VISQn cIr ? C i iJ' S
PLANNING &ZONING COMMISSION
MAILING ADDRESS ) �.9 }
1 i
THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A
OF:
8 HUNTLY CIRCLE ...��
UNIT
X CITY COUNTY OTHER LOCAL AGENCY
CITY PALM BEACH GARDENS c�'LTr3 fY PALM BEA& I {
NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION:
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED JUNE 27,2 000
MY POSITION IS:
ELECTIVE X APPOINTIVE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 8B
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board,
council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented
with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; although
the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict will vary greatly depending on whether
you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before
completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
ELECTED OFFICERS:
Berson holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which
Mures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which insures to
the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained.
In either case, you should disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on
which you are abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording
the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which insures
to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which insures to the special
gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained.
A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must
disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether
made by the officer or at his direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE
WILL BE TAKEN:
You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible
for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes.
A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest.
IF YOt,kMAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
You should complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording
the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
I, John Glidden, hereby disclose that on JUNE 27, 2000:
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
inured to my special private
inured to the special gain of
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of ny interest in the measure is a follows:
ECKERDS @ PROMENADE - PLANNING & ZONING MEETING
Date Filed
Signat
f
by whom I am retained.
� rn
d�
r- c w.
B rj
10
�s
Ol
4 TICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED
CLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING:
IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY,
REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000.
G: W DMIN \PERSONAL \JOH N \P &Z\ECK2 -CON. W PD
Page 2