Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z 011100�• CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PIANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION January 11, 2000 NIINUTES • • The Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, was called to order by Chair Pro Tem. John Glidden at 6:30 P.M. in the Assembly Room at the Municipal Complex, 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ANNOUNCEMENTS There were no announcements. ITEMS BY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR There were no items by the Growth Management Director. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mr. Solomon made a motion to approve the minutes of the December 14, 1999 meeting as submitted. Mr. Glidden seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 5 -0 vote. LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY The roll was called by Melissa Prindiville, Secretary for the meeting. Present Joel Channing, Chair John Glidden, Chair Pro Tem Daniel Lee Cruz Craig Kunkle, Jr. Dennis Solomon Dorothy Williams Barry Present, Alternate Absent John Nedvins, Vice Chair Ted Rauch, Alternate Also present at the meeting were Growth Management Director Roxanne Manning, City Attorney Leonard Rubin, Senior Planner Tabd Benothman, Principal Planners James Norquest and Kim Glas Castro, and Planner I John Lindgren. • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 11, 2000 Public Heating Petition LU- 99 -05: Small Scale Future Land Use Man Amendment for the Military Trail/Northlake Boulevard Enclave A staff - initiated petition to assign a future land use designation of "Commercial" to. 073 acres of land at the northwest corner and 1.86 acres of land at the northeast corner of Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard Principal Planner Kim Glas Castro presented the petition and answered questions regarding the petition. Chair Charming declared the Public Hearing open. Hearing no comments from the public, Chair Channing declared the Public Hearing closed. Ms. Castro explained that there was an amortization time for compliance for non - conforming items such as signage and landscaping. Non - conforming uses were discussed. Mr. Glidden made a motion to approve Petition LU -99 -05 as submitted. Ms. Williams seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 7-0 vote. so SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE The roll was called by Melissa Prindiville, Secretary for the meeting. Present Absent Joel Channing, Chair John Nedvins, Vice Chair John Glidden, Chair Pro Tem. Ted Rauch, Alternate Daniel Lee Cruz Craig Kunkle, Jr. Dennis Solomon Dorothy Williams Barry Present, Alternate Consideration ofApproval Petition SP- 99 -21: Rot v's Awning for Outdoor Seating A request by Joseph M. Mattei, agent for John O'Sullivan, for minor site plan approval of a 1.066 square foot awning over the previously approved outdoor seating at Roly's in the OakbrookShopping Center Planned Unit Development (PUD). (4- 42S -43E) Planner John Lindgren reviewed the staff report, and answered questions regarding the petition. Mr. Glidden explained that his firm had been the architect for Roly's; however, he had no conflict since he • 2 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 11, 2000 had had no involvement in the project. Joseph Maffei, agent for the petitioner, described the proposed awning. The awning dimensions were discussed, as well as the covered and uncovered areas. The Committee suggested changing the awning, with which the petitioner agreed. Mr. Glidden made a motion to approve Petition SP -99 -21 with design modifications that would change the geometry of the main canopy to a single square in plan hip roof pyramid awning supported above the four columns shown in the center bay of the three bays indicated with the bottom of the awning to be still above the flat roof with all other aspects of the skirt around the perimeter of that square area to be the same as depicted in the submitted drawings, and that the connection to the building be made by a rectangular in plan awning that would be approximately 13' wide east to west and extend from the face of the building somewhere between the top of the french doors and the bottom of the clerestory window, and project just underneath the skirt of the square hip canopy; and that the color be modified to burgundy, and to also amend the request to provide for a temporary clear roll-down curtain for inclement weather on the north face of the hip roof. Mr. Kunkle seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 7-0 vote. Workshop Petition SP- 99 -05: Site Plan Applications for Parcels 27.05 and 27.06 in the Regional Center DRI • A request by Urban Design Studio, agent, for site plan approval of a mixed -use development consisting of three land uses with a total floor area of 185,070 square feet The 16.19 -acre site is located within the Regional Center Development of Regional Impact (DRI). (5-425 -43E) Senior Planner Talal Benothman reviewed the staffreport, including changes made since the last meeting. Growth Management Director Manning reported a solution was in process for concern regarding future subdivision, which would be finalized and then presented to the Board. Henry Skokowski, agent for the petitioner, explained that only two of the items on the list of staff concerns from the last workshop had not yet been addressed, one ofwhich was to incorporate the bank into one ofthe office buildings on site. The petitioner explained that the building had been re- oriented on the site so that landscaping would shield the financial institution from PGA Boulevard. The other item was bringing the hotel all the way up to PGA Boulevard, to which the petitioner had responded by shifting the buildings so that a direct pedestrian walkway linked the hotel to the pedestrian network, even though the building remained set back. Mr. Skokowski explained that the intent had always been to have retail, office and hotel in the DRI rather than only office use, and would be a positive change. Mr. Skokowski presented sketches which had not been shown to staff of the petitioner's solution regarding the issue of the Borders Bookstore and the flip ofthe loading, etc., and shifting a building in order to enlarge the open space area. Proposed adjustments to the plans since the last meeting were reviewed. During comments by the Board, Mr. Cruz suggested terminating the east -west road further west and possibly adding a token median on the west side; suggested a feature containing landscaping in place of 0 3 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 11, 2000 the traffic circle; alignment ofthe road west ofthe circle by changing landscaping treatment on one side; widening the entrance feature to the hotel to center the hotel; and moving the loading area for retail to the other side. Ms. Williams commented she would like to see the outdoor cafe on the lake, that berming could take care of landscaping on the parking area, and felt the positioning ofthe buildings was positive. Mr. Skokowski explained why some of the information had not been submitted to staff prior to the meeting. Ms. Manning explained that the City Council was considering adding informational workshops to the review process for very large projects. Mr. Present commented he liked the green area that broke up the sea of parking; suggested a people space between buildings rather than a wall; and requested consideration of a corridor for future linkage. Mr. Glidden explained he would like the patio and courtyard area kept as it was rather than looking into a service area, recommended additional drive -in bank landscaping, preferred the alternate plan shifting the retail 2 building to the east and the hotel in the back, discussed the sketches provided in relation to architecture, and stated he liked the idea ofpresenting sketches for informational purposes and pointed out changes he would prefer. Mr. Solomon recommended leaving retail 1 rather than the alternative presented, but preferred the alternative for retail 2. Mr. Solomon expressed concern regarding future platting if any portions were sold in the future, commented he liked the pedestrian walkways and suggested enhancements. Mr. Kunkle preferred the dumpsters on the west at retail 1, supported retail 2 being moved to the east, stated the plant mix was good but requested ground cover be reduced from 36" to 24" in height, to consider larger than 3 gallon plants to block the view from PGA, and to assure consistency with the existing streetscape. Landscaping • plans were discussed. Chair Channing requested Y of berm in front of parking areas and verified certain points with the City Forester. It was explained that a landscaping plan showing plants to scale at time of planting would be prepared. Chair Channing expressed concern that he found the architecture very unsatisfactory, commented the site plan was good, but did not believe the architecture was in keeping with the look desired for PGA Boulevard and requested a rendered elevation of the street to see the overall look ofPGA Boulevard. Mr. Glidden requested roofing drawings. Chair Channing commented the walks inside the project were not really pedestrian linkages and made suggestions for changes. During discussion ofthe number of drive- through banking lanes, Mr. Skokowski explained that the bank had certified the majority of their business was not drive through. Chair Channing expressed disappointment that the lake could not have been used more but agreed with placement ofthe restaurant. Loading zones were described. Chair Channing requested elaboration ofthe landscaping, improvements to pedestrian linkages, and improvement of the architecture. Kenneth Blair, Catalfumo Construction, explained that the plans would be submitted to the mall design review board before presentation to City Council. Planner Benothman explained that a utility easement was still needed. PLANNING AND ZONING COMNUSSION The roll was called by Melissa Prindiville, Secretary for the meeting. Present • 4 Absent • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 11, 2000 Joel Channing, Chair John Nedvins, Vice Chair John Glidden, Chair Pro Tem Ted Rauch, Alternate Daniel Lee Cruz Craig Kunkle, Jr. Dennis Solomon Dorothy Williams Barry Present, Alternate Public Hearing and Recommendations to City Council PUD- 99 -03: PUD Application for San Michele 6%a. Frankel) Urban Design Studio, agent for Forest Lake Associates, L. C, requests approval for a single-family, custom -home development located on a 64.04 -acre parcel at the northwest corner of the intersection of CentralBoulevardandHoodRoad Ninety -One (91) single family homes are proposed, along with a 3,500 square foot clubhouse (25 &36- 41S -42E) Planner John Lindgren reviewed the staff report and answered questions from the Commission. • Henry Skokowski, agent for the Petitioner, reviewed the conditions and explained that FPL's historic right was close to resolution, however it would not affect this project. Mr. Skokowski explained that the north road would be dedicated in part to Benjamin School, who would construct the road and maintenance would be shared. Mr. Skokowski proposed that condition 17 be changed to require a school bus pull-off Mr. Kunkle commented that he liked the mix of proposed plants; however, expressed concern with the lack of specificity of which types of plants and ground covers would be used in specific locations. Discussion ensued. Ms. Williams questioned what plants would be used on the trellises, to which Landscape Architect Steve Parker responded that the specific material had not yet been selected. Chair Charming declared the public hearing open. Hearing no comments from the public, Chair Channing declared the public hearing closed. Mr. Solomon made a motion to recommend approval to the City Council of Petition PUD -99 -03 with the following conditions: 1. Prior to first reading by City Council, the applicant shall revise all plans to include the ultimate right -of -way for Central Boulevard. 2. Prior to first reading by City Council, the applicant shall revise the plans to show a 50 -foot z 50 -foot easement for a Seacoast Utility Authority well site. 3. Prior to first reading by City Council, the applicant shall revise the conceptual landscape plans to show the proposed water and sewer lines and utility easements. • 5 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 11, 2000 4. Prior to first reading by City Council, the applicant shall revise the site plan to show the 20 -foot drainage easement between lots #45 and #46. 5. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall submit a gopher tortoise relocation and management plan that is acceptable to the City and the City's Consulting Environmental Scientist. 6. Prior to the issuance of the 45th house building permit, the Parkway System, including the median, shall be completed along Hood Road and Central Boulevard. 7. Prior to the issuance of the 45' house building permit, the clubhouse and pool recreation area shall be completed. 8. Prior to the adjacent lot wall/fence being installed or constructed on north and west boundary, all perimeter buffer landscaping or preserve restoration, exotic plant removal and/or enhancement work shall be completed. 9. The Homeowners Association (HOA), as required by the HOA documents, shall maintain • landscaping and irrigation within the medians and road shoulders along the entire length of the development of Hood Road, Central Boulevard, and the future road along the northern boundary shall br maintained in perpetuity by Benjamin School. The City shall require, as a condition of approval of any new project located on the north, south, or east of these adjacent road systems, that they bear their proportionate share of the cost of the continued maintenance thereof. In the event a Special Parkway District is formed by the City of Palm Beach Gardens, or another entity, pertaining to the roadway maintenance around this project, the HOA shall automatically become a member of said District. This condition shall also be made a part of the HOA documents. 10. The security gates shall be equipped with a Knox key switch to provide the Fire Rescue Department with emergency access (Standard Eire Prevention Code 602.6.7). 11. Prior to first reading by City Council, the amount of money to be paid in lieu of parkland shall be established. 12. Prior to construction plan approval, the money to be paid in lieu of parkland shall be paid to the City. 13. There shall not be any man -made berming or non -native vegetation within the perimeter open spaces/parkway areas that are platted as preserves. 0 6 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 11, 2000 14. No land clearing, other than exotic invasive vegetation, shall occur prior to the posting of surety bond. 15. Pursuant to Article III, Section 114 -71, entitled Required subdivision improvements, prior to the issuance of the building permit, the applicant shall be required to post a bond for the project landscaping/buffer and entry feature. In order to arrive at the cost estimate for a bond, detailed landscape plans need to be completed, reviewed and approved by the City Staff, including the City's Environmental Consultant. Where wetlands are being concerted to upland forest, and where poor quality uplands are being restored (as in the 0.42 area B), typical minimum- planting plans per a specific area may be approved. 16. The project's plat shall include restrictions placed in the lake maintenance easement (I.M.E.) which prohibits structures, walls and fencing, but allow landscaping as permitted by the HOA, as long as there is at least 12 feet of unobstructed passage through the landscaping around the entire lake. 17. Prior to the issuance of the final certificate of occupancy, the applicant, successors or assigns, shall provide a bus stop pull-off and shelter completely out of the right -of -way or a bus stop turn around in front of all access control points or gated communities. The size • and location of all such school bus stops shall be coordinated with the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Palm Beach County, and the School District. This condition shall be left open for further discussion between the applicant and the School Board in terms of the exact location of the bus stop pull -off as to whether it would be completely within the right -of- way or not. 18. The applicant, successors or assigns shall post a notice of annual boundary school assignments for students from this development. The School District will provide an 11" x 17" sign to be posted in a clear and visible location in all sales offices and models with the following information: Notice to Home Buyers/Tenants School age children may not be assigned to the public school closest to their residence. School Board policies regarding overcrowding, racial balance or other boundary policy decisions affect school boundaries. Please contact the Palm Beach County School District Boundary Office at (561) 434 -8100 for the most current school assignments. 19. Applicant shall return to this Board with detailed plans for the Commission's review depicting architecture for the clubhouse, and details of the landscaping of the entry road and the clubhouse. • 7 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 11, 2000 Mr. Solomon stated that this motion also included approval of the six waivers requested by the Petitioner. Motion was seconded by Mr. Present. During discussion of the motion, Mr. Skokowski questioned whether further review would be by the Site Plan and Appearance Committee, to which Mr. Norquest responded that the City Council had authority under the Code to conduct further review. Motion carried by unanimous 7-0 vote. Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council Petition PUD- 99 -11: PUD Amendment for Marina Gardens (f.ka. SoverelNorth Townhomes) A request by Urban Design Studio, agent for Mutual Land Development Company, for an amendment to a planned unit development (PUD), which would increase the site by 0.33 acres and result in a net increase of two (2) townhomes. The 7.59 -acre site is located on the south side of Idlewild Road approximately 500 feet east of Prosperity Farms Road (5- 42S -43E) Planner John Lindgren reviewed the staff report and answered questions from the Commission.. Henry Skokowski, agent for the Petitioner, presented the project. The Commissioners discussed the project, and none objected to the second ground sign. Ownership and maintenance issues were discussed. Pedestrian linkages were discussed, with some Commissioners commenting that if people cut through a • grassy area enough that a path was made, then it could be paved. Mr. Cruz established that a sidewalk already existed and the petitioner was proposing removal; and expressed his opinion that the impact of leaving the existing sidewalk from a privacy standpoint would be negligible. Chair Channing declared the Public Hearing open. Betty Britch, 2339 Idlewild Road, asked where lot S was, which was pointed out on the map. Hearing no further comments, Chair Channing declared the Public Hearing closed. Mr. Present made a motion to recommend approval to the City Council of Petition PUD -99 -11 with the following conditions: 1. Prior to first reading by City Council, the applicant shall revise the landscape plans to depict proposed water and sewer lines. 2. All of the previous conditions of approval in Ordinance 5, 1999 shall be carried over with the approval of this petition. 3. Prior to construction plan approval, the applicant shall comply with condition #5 in Ordinance 5, 1999. 4. Prior to first reading by City Council, the applicant shall revise the plans to show a sidewalk connecting the site to the sidewalk along the south side of Idlewild Road (as • 8 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 11, 2000 required by the Americans with Disabilities Act). 5. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the applicant will have to submit $2,066 for monies in lieu of parkland, in addition to those monies stated in condition #8 in Ordinance 5, 1999. 6. Prior to the issuance of the final certificate of occupancy, the applicant, successors or assigns shall provide a bus stop pull -off and shelter completely out of the right -of -way or a bus stop turn around in front of all access control points or gated communities. The size and location of all such school bus stops shall be coordinated with the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Palm Beach County, and the School District. 7. The applicant, successors or assigns shall post a notice of annual boundary school assignments for students from this development. The School District will provide an 11" z 17" sign to be posted in a clear and visible location in all sales offices and models with the following information: Notice to Home Buyers/Tenants • School age children may not be assigned to the public school closest to their residence. School Board policies regarding overcrowding, racial balance or other boundary policy decisions affect school boundaries. Please contact the Palm Beach County School District Boundary Office at (561) 434 -8100 for the most current school assignments. Mr. Kunkle seconded the motion. During discussion of the motion, staff requested direction regarding the requested waivers. Planner Lindgren reviewed the requested waivers: waiver for the second ground sign, waiver for the 7 -foot wall, waiver of the berming to protect landscaping, and waiver of the required setback waivers, and continuance of the one waiver granted in the previous approval. Mr. Present clarified that he was proposing support of the Petitioner's request for a second ground sign. Mr. Kunkle seconded the granting of the waivers. Mr. Solomon proposed an amendment that if the Association was not to own all of the buffers that the Homeowners Association documents must include a provision that all of the buffer areas would be maintained by the Association and the documents must be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney. Mr. Present accepted the amendment and Mr. Kunkle seconded addition of the amendment to the motion. Motion carried by unanimous vote of 7 -0. Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council Petition PUD- 99 -I2: PUD Amendment for Phase 2 of the Gardens Corporate Centre Anthony E. Oliver, of Oliver- Glidden & Partners, Inc., and as agent for an ownership consortium, is requesting a planned unit development amendment for a 15. 6-acre site located at the northeast • 9 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 11, 2000 corner of PGA Boulevard andAlternateAIA. Theproposed amendment would include two six-story office buildings (totaling 223,943 square feet) and a separate parking garage. (6-42S-43E) John Glidden stepped down due to conflict of interest. Planner John Lindgren reviewed the staff report. Ed Oliver, agent for the petitioner, stated agreement with all conditions except 13, 14 and 15. Mr. Oliver reviewed the conditions the petitioner agreed to and explained why there was agreement. Mr. Oliver proposed that in regard to condition 13 that a baseline would be established for what had been approved in 1994, which was a substantial amount of landscaping, and that the petitioner would not be responsible to pay for upgrades to that prior approval. Mr. Oliver explained that in regard to condition 14, the previous approval did not include a condition of approval for this project to bear the expense of installing landscaping in the medians and shoulders of PGA Boulevard, and asking that landscaping to be installed for the flyover should not be included. Mr. Oliver requested that the wording `TGA Boulevard" be stricken from condition 14 (1), (2), and (3). Mr. Oliver commented that if the Regional Center Property Owners Association no longer existed, the applicant agreed to be responsible for the maintenance ofAlternate AIA, but not PGA Boulevard. In response to Mr. Solomon's questions, Mr. Oliver explained that FDOT had a landscape plan for the flyover, and the City had asked FDOT to fund • the right -of -way plantings proposed for the flyover; however, FDOT had not yet provided a definitive answer and he believed the City would not allow FDOT to proceed with the flyover without FDOT funding the landscaping. Mr. Present expressed concern that the medians might not be landscaped properly, to which Mr. Oliver responded that because of the City Council's strong concern he did not believe any of this landscaping would fall through the cracks, and that further information on the landscaping would evolve as the flyover project progressed. In response to Ms. Williams' comment expressing her opinion that there was room to install mid -story plant materials, Mr. Oliver provided a graphic and explained why certain areas had been left open by the Landscape Architect. Principal Planner Tmi Norquest explained that the landscaping/flyover situation was very much in a state of flux, with new information being received daily and there was still not enough information to make a final recommendation on this issue; and that in the interest ofmoving this petition forward, staffhad tried to establish conditions that would cover every eventuality. Discussion ensued. Mr. Oliver suggested adding a condition 14 (S) that both the City and applicant recognize that the proposed PGA landscaping improvements in the median are of benefit to more than just the applicant. In the event that FDOT or other funding sources do not pay for the median landscaping required by the City, the applicant would agreed to share in its proportionate interest of those landscaping and irrigation costs. Elaine Adams commented that Mr. Oliver was trying to word the proposed condition in such a way that it would be fair, and she agreed that if in the future a fair payment was worked out they would pay their share if it was agreed to by the other landowners as well Ms. Adams stated they did not want to agree to a totally unknown cost. Mr. Solomon and Chair Channing expressed their opinion that an unfair burden would 0 10 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 11, 2000 be placed on the applicant by requiring them to be responsible for more than the baseline landscaping which the applicant had agreed to assume responsibility. City Forester Mark Hendrickson explained there was a known amount of landscaping for which he could provide an exhibit, which was the baseline amount of landscaping. Mr. Oliver commented that the petitioner could agree to that plan. Mr. Oliver suggested the following wording to be inserted into condition 14 (1) based on preliminary plans already submitted to the City, after the wording per the FDOT final plans. Discussion ensued. Mr. Oliver stated that if his suggested wording could be added and then continue with either 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 as previously stated, and that the petitioner was comfortable with number 5. Chair Charming declared the Public Hearing open. Hearing no comments from the public, Chair Channing declared the Public Hearing closed. A motion was made as follows. During formulation of the motion it was agreed to pause and go on to the next agenda item while the approved plans were obtained. Upon re- convening this item, Mr. Cruz made a motion to recommend approval to the City Council of Petition PUD -99 -12 with the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of the final certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall obtain Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District's standard permit. 2. Conditions #10, #17, and #18 of Resolution 118, 1994 (attached) shall be carried over with the approval of this petition. 3. The color of the louvers shall be compatible with the surrounding building. 4. The loss of the traffic trips with this approval (compared to the previous approval) shall be permanent. The applicant will not be permitted to amend this PUD approval in such a manner that would increase the amount of traffic generated by this site. 5. The bank's drive- through operation shall account for less than 50% of the bank's business. 6. Prior to construction plan approval, the applicant, successors, or assigns shall verify that all the requirements of the master stormwater permit have been satisfied to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7. Any 9 -foot wide parking spaces on the site shall be double striped. 8. The lighting intensity at the perimeter of the parking garage shall not exceed the 10.0 foot - candle maximum. 9. Prior to construction plan approval, sidewalk detail shall be added to the paving, grading • 11 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 11, 2000 and drainage detail sheet. 10. Prior to construction plan approval, the applicant shall identify the shapes located at the edges of the contoured sidewalks located throughout the site on the Site bans (they appear to be benches). 11. Prior to construction plan approval, the applicant shall move the stop bars at the circular drives (shown on the site plan), to the outside of the pedestrian crossings. 12. Prior to construction plan approval, the applicant shall add curb cuts to the sidewalks that cross the entrance to the site from Kyoto Gardens Drive. 13. Pursuant to Article III, Section 114 -71, of the City's Land Development Regulations, the applicant shall provide a bond or escrow for 110% of the cost to install landscaping and irrigation within the PGA Boulevard and Alternate AIA roadway (flyover) improvements, per the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) final plans, from and including the respective medians of said roads to the property line, which includes phase 1, 2a, and 2b. The applicant, successors or assigns shall provide said bond to the City within six (6) months of this approval. • 14. Prior to the final certificate of occupancy of Phase 2a or 2b, which ever occurs first, the applicant shall either: 1. Install the landscaping and irrigation within PGA Boulevard and Alternate AlA per the MOT final plans, K based on preliminary plans already submitted by FDOT and received by the City dated August 19, 1999, from and including the respective medians of said roads to the property line, which includes Phase 1, or 2. Installation of the landscaping and irrigation shall be the responsibility of the applicant within 12 months of the completion of the PGA Boulevard and Alternate AlA flyover improvements, or 3. If any other separate agreement between the applicant and City, the above mentioned landscaping and irrigation is installed by FDOT or any other entity, the applicant shall not be responsible for said installation, or 4. H the PGA Boulevard flyover does not get built by January 1, 2005, the Alternate AlA median and road shoulder landscaping approved with Resolution 118, 1994 (previously part of Phase 2) shall be installed, pursuant to the landscape plan as referenced in Section 2, numbers 6, 7, and 9 of Resolution 118,1994. 15. The applicant shall be responsible for the maintenance of the PGA Boulevard and Alternate AlA landscaping and irrigation from and including the medians of said roadways to the property line, which includes Phase 1, when and if for any reason the • 12 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 11, 2000 Regional Center Property Owners Association (a.k.a. MacArthur Center Master Association) terminates their maintenance of said areas. This maintenance shall continue even if any of this area reverts back to private ownership. 16. The MEDICAL MALL AT PALM BEACH GARDENS PLAT ONE, as approved by Resolution 21, 1995, shall be replatted to include the Gardens Corporate Center, prior to issuance for the building permit. The plant shall designate the first 55 feet associated with Phases 2a and 2b, and the first 35 feet associated with Phase 1, along Alternate AlA and PGA Boulevard, as open space landscape easement for buffering and landscape purposes. 17. The following shall be the permitted ancillary uses on this site: - pharmacy - newsstand - beauty salon/barber shop - medical retail -bank -card shop -title company - staffing company - bookstore -office supplies/pack & ship - travel agency -retail brokerage -real; estate office - mortgage company - restaurant/cafe /coffee shop /internet cafe/bakery 18. The "final plans" as referred to in these conditions shall mean "based on preliminary plans already submitted by FDOT and received by the City (Applicable sheets agreed upon by staff and the petitioner to be: Cover sheet, Sheet 35, Sheet 36, and Sheet 39, all dated August 19, 1999). This motion shall also grant approval of requested waivers. Motion was seconded and carried by unanimous 6-0 vote. (John Glidden had stepped down) Workshop PUD- 99 -06: Doubletree North PUD Amendment Urban Design Studio, agent for AGLP Investments Na. 2 L.P., is requesting a planned unit • 13 • • • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 11, 2000 development amendment for 25, 000 square feet of retail and 8,115 square feet of restaurant use, for a total of 33,115 square feet The site is located on the east side of Military Trai4 650 feet north of FGA Boulevard (1- 42S -42E) Chair Joel Charming stepped down; John Glidden re- joined the Commission. Planner John Lindgren reviewed the staff report and answered questions from the Commission. Henry Skokowski, agent for the petitioner, estimated lot coverage was approximately 12 %. Mr. Glidden questioned whether the current site plan showed a parking garage or any buildings on the land that made up this application, and suggested looking at the current site plan so that previously approved items would not need to be considered. Discussion ensued. Mr. Lindgren clarified that any future buildings or future elevations would have to come back for approval; and that the dry dentention required water to percolate through it within 24 hours. The process for review of this PUD was clarified.. Henry Skokowski presented the project. One item mentioned by Mr. Skokowski was that the petitioner would re- evaluate the first signage request and follow up later. Because of the lateness of the hour, it was suggested that the workshop be delayed to the next meeting. The petitioner was requested to present information regarding landscaping, plant materials, traffic, street light, separation ofbuffer, size and dimensions of the building, site lighting, buffering off Military Trail, ingress and egress . Mr. Skokowski expressed his understanding that a left turn into the property would not be allowed. Mr. Kunkle requested the parking buffer along Military Trail be 4' high and 2' on center to block the parking area. Mr. Glidden proposed that the existing entrance be expanded and reconfigured Mr. Glidden identified another traffic area that might be changed, and suggested a wall next to the loading space, to look more to the service ofthe restaurant so that items would be contained inside or in a walled-off area. Mr. Glidden stated his biggest concern was if the actual building was a 25,000 s.£ rectangle. Staff indicated they had no problem with a workshop on this petition in two weeks and the public hearing after that, with the ability to continue the public hearing to a later date if it became necessary. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business to come before the Commission. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business to come before the Commission. 14 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 11, 2000 ITEMS BY CITY COUNCIL LIAISON There were no items by the City Council Liaison. • 15 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 11, 2000 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. The next meeting will be held January 25, 2000. APPROVED: • (Absent) John N ' s, Vice Chair J hn GIjAdm Chair Pro Tem Craig Dorothy Williams Melissa Prindiville, Secretary for the Meeting 40 16 { FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS T NAME - FIRST NAME - MIDDLE NANSEhi r' �- nl I S Q'_' rf ` " L 9 NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE IDDEN, JOHN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION „ Is -I � a MAILING ADDRESS THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A 8 HUNTLY CIRCLE ", t;' °! L U J i`,f i t' � "r I_ • h ! %" UNIT OF: x CITY COUNTY OTHER LOCAL AGENCY CITY PALM BEACH GARDENS COUNTY PALM BEACH NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED JANUARY 11, 2000 MY POSITION IS: ELECTIVE X APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 86 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; although the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES ELECTED OFFICERS: Werson holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which ures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which insures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. In either case, you should disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which insures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which insures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether made by the officer or at his direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest. SNC1:03 i3 :10 J0SIi.d,3d )S ,IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. ' You should complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording • the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST I, John Glidden, hereby disclose that on JANUARY 11. 2000: (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain; inured to the special gain of o 0 �' e , by whom I am retained. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of ny interest in the measure is a follows: GARDENS CORPORATE CENTER G O O � �� wq Date Filed Sign TICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED CLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000. G:\ADMIN \PERSONAL \JOHN \P &Z\GCC- CON.WPD Page 2