Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z 092899CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION September 28, 1999 MINUTES The Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, was called to order by Chair Pro Tem John Glidden at 6:30 P.M. in the Assembly Room at the Municipal Complex, 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. The gavel was passed to Chair Joel Channing after his arrival at 6:40 p.m. ITEMS BY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR There were no items by the Growth Management Director. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of August 24. 1999 - Diane Carlino made a motion to approve the minutes of the August 24, 1999 meeting as submitted. Mr. Cruz seconded the motion, which carried by 6 -0 vote. Staff requested it be noted for the record that the last scheduled meeting for September 14 was canceled due to the hurricane. • SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE The roll was called by Jackie Holloman, Secretary for the meeting. Present Absent Joel Channing, Chair (Arrived at 6:40 p.m.) John Nedvins, Vice Chair (Arrived at 6:40 p.m.) John Glidden, Chair Pro Tem Diane Carlino Daniel Lee Cruz Craig Kunkle, Jr. Dennis Solomon Ted Rauch, Alternate Also present at the meeting were Growth Management Director Roxanne Manning, City Attorney Carole Post; Principal Planner James Norquest, Planner I Angela Csinsi, Planner I John Lindgren, and Mark Hendrickson, City Forester. Workshop Petition SP- 99 -10: PGA Headquarters Office Building Alan Sirassler, agent for PGA of America, is requesting a site plan amendment to build an additional • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes September 28, 1999 60,000 square foot office building and to remove an existing 5,495 square foot sales center. The subject site is 10.11 acres and is located on the west side of Avenue of the Champions, approximately 114 mile south of its intersection with PGA Boulevard (10-42S-42E) Planner I Angela Csinsi presented the staff report dated 9/28/99. Alan Strassler, agent for PGA of America, displayed a 3 -D model and explained orientation of the buildings. Parking was discussed. Donaldson Hearing, Landscape Architect, reviewed the landscape plans and described plant materials. Mr. Hearing reported meeting with the POA regarding landscaping and commented an easement would be provided to the POA for the existing PGA of America berm and landscape hedge. Mr. Kunkle expressed his opinion that the crepe myrtles could be incorporated into the perimeter where their lack of leaves in the winter would not be a problem. Mr. Solomon expressed concern regarding the view of homeowners of the back of the building. Mr. Hearing explained that the POA had requested the buffer landscaping be substantially increased, which would be done. Mr. Solomon expressed traffic concerns and suggested signage on Avenue of the Champions. Lighting for the property was described. Ms. Carlino questioned whether the meeting had been held where an update letter from the ARC was required. The petitioner explained the procedure, which would result in a letter of approval before coming back before this board. Mr. Cruz questioned whether there was sod right to the base of the building. Mr. Hearing responded that occurred only in the front, for an intentional very architectural clean look. Mr. Cruz requested a rendering with a closer view to better explain the landscaping. Mr. • Cruz questioned the berm slope, to which Mr. Hearing responded that the berm would be at a different slope and would be maximized. Mr. Cruz stated his understanding was that the truth in landscaping rule would require depiction of trees at their sizes at planting. Mr. Glidden commented that size at planting and size at 2 years was what was needed. POA representative Ed Dicker explained that he lived in Thurston, west of the sales pavilion, and this project had been devastating to the Thurston development of PGA since the existing sales building was going to be demolished and replaced with a commercial building ten times its size. Mr. Dicker commented that what he was looking for was to totally block the view of the building from the residences in Thurston with berms and landscaping. Mr. Dicker explained that a temporary parking lot was erected earlier this year which he had been told was now a permanent parking lot, which was literally in his back yard. Mr. Dicker requested that the view of the parking lot and vehicles be totally blocked from view, and that berms and landscaping be installed at the beginning of the project to block view and noise. Mr. Dicker recommended that berms and landscaping block the first floor view and that trees be installed to screen the second floor. Alan Strassler explained that the original master plan contained a PGA museum and it was never intended for a single building to be the only building at this location. Mr. Strassler commented 100% screening with landscaping would be very difficult, and explained that approximately 1 -1/2 years ago the POA had issued a letter of approval with conditions. Photos were distributed showing the distance of the project from Mr. Dicker's house. An aerial presentation was requested. Mr. Glidden requested the landscaping • 2 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes September 28, 1999 and buffering at the western portion of the site be substantially increased; questioned the compatibility of the architecture relating to the other building; questioned the completely different landscaping on the front and back sides; and preferred less color contrast. Colors and materials were discussed. Mr. Glidden questioned whether there had been any consideration of a second exit, to which the petitioner responded that had not been discussed. Mr. Strassler explained that staggered release and report to work times could be the solution. Mr. Glidden requested that the City Engineer review the single access and the extension of the property line of Avenue of the Champions. Mr. Glidden commented that the density of this project was low; questioned the lack of a sidewalk north of the entrance and at parking lot connections to the building. Petitioner explained that the POA did not want a sidewalk extending out to PGA Boulevard. Ms. Carlin agreed that sidewalks were needed, that the landscaping should be increased, stated she had no problem with proposed waivers, agreed that the City Engineer should review the egress, and requested the mechanical equipment be totally screened. Mr. Strassler discussed connectivity. Mr. Cruz also supported the sidewalks and more connectivity between buildings. Staff clarified that a drainage statement had been provided. Chris Holmes reviewed the planned drainage and exfiltration trenches. Parking during construction was questioned by Mr. Cruz, to which Mr. Strassler responded that existing parking would remain until building completion, when new parking would be available. Mr. Cruz requested the greatest effort possible of landscaping and berm be made to shield the building. Chair Channing agreed that screening should be installed initially with the start of construction and that the petitioner should meet with the homeowners concerned. Mr. Glidden clarified that 4 -6 feet • of berming supplemented with landscaping would be sufficient. Mr. Kunkle pointed out that there was not room for a 14' berm. Mr. Nedvins agreed. Chair Channing commented it was not necessary to hide a building but it should be screened substantially. Ms. Carlino requested the color be toned down. No objections to requested waivers were expressed by the board. Workshop Petition SP- 99 -02: Nativity Lutheran Church & Preschool Site Plan A request by Anthony E Oliver, agent for Nativity Lutheran Church, Inc-, for site plan approval far a new fellowship hall (8,250 square feet), a future sanctuary (11,230 square feet), and the expansion of their educational and administrative facilities (18,645 square feet). The site is located at the northwest corner of Holly Drive and Plant Drive- (12- 42S -42E) John Glidden stepped down due to conflict of interest. Alternate Ted Rauch took Mr. Glidden's seat. Planner I John Lindgren reviewed the site plan and staff report and answered questions. Ed Oliver reviewed the site plan and displayed color renderings. City Forester Mark Hendrickson explained the landscape phasing. Ms. Carlino questioned whether dead -end parking could be made into a cul -de -sac, to which Mr. Oliver responded by describing the traffic circulation and why dead -end parking would work best. The extent of the terrace in phase one was clarified. Mr. Cruz suggested a nicer roof material, to which the petitioner responded that the material chosen was compatible with the • 3 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes September 28, 1999 existing buildings. Mr. Cruz requested larger landscape materials be used in order to shield parking from Plant Drive. Chair Channing questioned whether the turn lane was encroaching on the sidewalk, to which the petitioner responded that would be clarified at the next presentation. Chair Channing questioned the stacking requirement, to which staff responded that had been satisfied. Item for Discussion Nature's Hideaway Color Determination_ Staff is requesting the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee's opinion with regard to the color consistency with the approved design guidelines for a house located on lot 11, within the Nature's Hideaway development The site is located west of Prosperity Farms Road, approximately 675 feet north of Burns Road (8- 42S -43E) Mr. Glidden re-Joined the Board. Principal Planner Norquest reviewed the staff report, and presented additional documents, photos, and a paint chip of the house color. Dave Buckner, Contractor, explained that approval for the color had been received from the HOA before the house was painted, and provided materials in support of the color. Woody and Joann Hayes, the owners of the home, defended the color and presented letters which • confirmed their interpretation that their color was an earth tone. Ms. Carlino expressed her opinion that the board could not ask the homeowners to change the color of their home since all the neighbors were in agreement with the color, but that in the future guidelines should be more specific. Mr. Glidden agreed and commented he would not consider this color an earth tone. Growth Management Director Manning explained that more information on colors would be provided in the future. Mr. Solomon commented the homeowner should have gotten an interpretation from the City; that he felt staff was correct in bringing this matter for discussion; and expressed his opinion this color was a far cry from an earth tone. The homeowner expressed his opinion that the City should not regulate the colors people painted their homes. Mr. Cruz commented he did not consider the color an earth tone but that he did not find it offensive and felt it worked well with the home and surrounding homes. Mr. Cruz explained that the City must follow their process and a palette of colors should have been established so that interpretations would not be necessary. Chair Channing questioned who was opposing the color, to which the response was that only staff questioned the color. Chair Channing commented staff had done the right thing, complimented Mr. Buckner on the project, and stated he liked the colors. City Attorney Post advised as to proper procedure. Mr. Glidden made a motion that based on the circumstances, it was the intent of the Board to find that the Design Guidelines have been met. Mr. Nedvins seconded the motion. During discussion of the motion, Mr. Kunkle asked what precedent this decision would make. Attorney Post advised that the board's decision was limited to the facts of this particular case. The design standards remain in full force and effect. The motion carried by 6 -1 vote with Mr. Solomon opposed. � 4 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes September 28, 1999 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION The roll was called by Jackie Holloman, Secretary for the meeting. Joel Channing, Chair John Nedvins, Vice Chair John Glidden, Chair Pro Tem Diane Carlino Daniel Lee Cruz Craig Kunkle, Jr. Dennis Solomon Ted Rauch, Alternate Workshop Petition CU -99 -01 • Nativity Lutheran Church & Preschool Conditional Use A request by Anthony E. Oliver, agent for Nativity Lutheran Church, Inc-, for conditional • use approval for a new fellowship hall (8,250 square feet), a future sanctuary (11,230 square feet), and the expansion of their educational and administrative facilities (18,645 square feet). The site is located at the northwest corner of Holly Drive and Plant Drive- (12-42S-42E) Mr. Glidden stepped down due to conflict of interest. Staff noted for the record that all comments previously made regarding this project during the workshop for site plan approval would apply to this request. The board had no further comments. Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council Petition PUD- 99 -10: Publix Expansion _at Oakbrook Square Shopping Center Ms. Anne Booth, Urban Design Studio, agent for Oakbrook Square Shopping Center corporation, is requesting rezoning of a 20.35 -acre site from CG -1, General Commercial, to PUD, Planned Unit Development, to allow for the renovation and 10,987 - square foot expansion of the Publix grocery store at Oakbrook Square Shopping Center. The site is located at the northeast corner of PGA Boulevard and U.S. Highway One (4- 42S -43E) Mr. Glidden re joined the Board. Principal Planner Norquest reviewed the staff report, including requested waivers, and advised that • 5 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes September 28, 1999 staff recommended all sign waivers be denied. Ms. Carlino commented that the sign waivers should be denied, with which Mr. Nedvins agreed. The height waiver was discussed. The possibility of connecting the east parking lot to the rear of the property was mentioned by Mr. Glidden. A roof plan was requested. Anne Booth, agent for the petitioner, explained the improvements which had been done by the new owners since they purchased the project approximately three years ago. Ms. Booth reviewed the height and sign waiver requests, displayed color renderings, and reviewed bicycle parking and landscaping. In response to questions from Mr. Kunkle, Ms. Booth clarified the proposed colors and signage. Ms. Booth clarified the roof materials on specific roof slopes. Mr. Glidden commented that if there was a pediment with metal roofing then the proposed metal roofing was great; and if there were other roofing materials on the rest of the center, the Board should be made aware of that. Mr. Glidden commented the site plan looked fine and requested clarification regarding connecting the east parking lot to the rear. Ms. Booth clarified the circulation, which allowed access to the rear from the other side. Mr. Glidden stated he had no problem with four signs, but requested the sidewalk be connected to the project and recommended that the area along road 703 be returned to landscaping. Mr. Cruz stated he could not support the sign waiver for reasons given by staff. Mr. Cruz requested clarification on the additional lighting, which Ms. Booth explained was landscape lighting. Mr. Cruz asked staff to look at possible non - conforming sign lighting and commented that sidewalk is accessibility was a requirement of the Florida Accessibility Code and therefore a connected access from the street should be provided. It was noted that the rooftop parapet was a minimum of four feet. An elevation and photographs of the rest of the center were requested in order to determine changes in the look of the roof. Tom Hamilton, representing the shopping center, commented on how the shopping center design was being changed. Chair Charming declared the public hearing open. Hearing no comments from the public, Chair Charming declared the public hearing closed. Ms. Carlino made a motion recommending to the City Council of Petition PUD -99 -10 with the following conditions: City Forester and Landscape Architect of Record shall confirm that all approved landscaping has been installed prior to final Building inspection approval. 2. Oakbrook Square Shopping Center shall be responsible for the maintenance of all roadway landscape within PGA Boulevard and US 1 per the approved landscape plans. 3. Agreement to all the requested waivers. Following discussion, petitioner agreed to work with the City Forester to remove and replace C-1 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes September 28, 1999 carrotwood trees. Mr. Cruz requested comments from staff regarding the sign waiver requests. Mr. Norquest responded that the sign waiver presented a consistency problem, since in January the City had sent letters to many property owners, one of which was this property owner, notifying them their signs must conform by January 2000. City Attorney Post advised a recommendation should be made regarding the sign waiver request. Discussion ensued regarding sign variances. Mr. Cruz made a motion to amend the motion to include that access into the site be provided, meeting the requirements of the accessibility code and satisfactory to staff. Ms. Carlino accepted the amendment. Mr. Solomon seconded the amended motion. Mr. Solomon requested clarification of the colors. Mr. Nedvins objected to approving a project which was only presented at one meeting, stated he would vote against it for that reason, and recommended it come back for a more global rather than a piecemeal look. It was clarified that staff had not reviewed colors to assure that they matched the existing center. Mr. Glidden recommended an additional amendment to the motion to specify there be four short sidewalks, one on either side of the U.S. One entrances, or a total of four on U.S. One, and one sidewalk connection on the south - -on the east side of the entry driveway. Mr. Cruz stated if Mr. Glidden was amending his amendment, he accepted it. • Chair Channing stated he would not support the motion because a whole picture of the project had not been presented, actual colors had not been presented, and he was not in favor of increasing signage. Mr. Solomon commented that the rendering did not show the colors, but actual color chips had been presented, which the petitioner could handle with staff, and the motion could be amended to include that. Mr. Solomon recommended an amendment to the motion that there only be one sidewalk off either side of the U.S. One entrances and to return the strip along road 703 to landscaping. Ms. Carlino withdrew the motion. Mr. Glidden expressed his concern with approving this project on first reading; however, made the following motion: Mr. Glidden made a motion recommending to the City Council of Petition PUD -99 -10 with the following conditions: 1. City Forester and Landscape Architect of Record shall confirm that all approved landscaping has been installed prior to final Building inspection approval. 2. Oakbrook Square Shopping Center shall be responsible for the maintenance of all • 7 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes September 28, 1999 roadway landscape within PGA Boulevard and US 1 per the approved landscape plans. 3. Waivers shall be allowed as requested, with signage to remain as is, but any new or replaced signage must conform to Code. 4. Sidewalk access shall be provided between the 703 sidewalk and the east side of the south entrance to connect to the public corner, and at least one sidewalk shall be placed either to the north or south of each of the U.S. One entrances connecting the parking lot with the U.S. One sidewalk. S. The area of non - required pavement at the south entrance- everything east of the last parking space —shall be removed and turned back to landscaping with the landscaping plan to be reviewed by the City Forester prior to presentation to the City Council 6. Carrotwood trees shall be removed where feasible, to be reviewed by the City Forester, with consideration given to buffering adjacent homeowners and shall be replaced where necessary to meet the point system with new trees that meet Code. 7. The colors as submitted shall be verified by staff to match the existing center prior to • review by City Council. 8. The metal slope roofing material shall be approved only if it matches the other adjacent sloped roof. Mr. Kunkle seconded the motion. The motion failed by 3 -4 vote, with Mr. Cruz, Ms. Carlino, Mr. Channing, and Mr. Nedvins opposed. Ms. Carlin expressed opposition regarding returning the pavement to landscape area and opposition to the sidewalks as proposed. Mr. Glidden commented that the existing facade of Eckerds was remaining. Mr. Nedvins made a motion to postpone recommendation to the City Council of Petition PUD- 99 -10. Discussion ensued regarding whether a motion was necessary. Attorney Post advised that no further motion was required in order to postpone this item, but that a motion could be made if desired. Petitioner requested postponement. Direction to staff was to address Eckerd's as a part of the plan. Growth Management Director Manning explained that the Board always had the option to postpone an application. • 8 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes September 28, 1999 Public Hearing (Continued - to be continued again to October 26, 19991 Petition PCD 99 05• Regional Center DRI/PCD Amendment Relating to the Change in CommerciaUOfrice/Business Square Footage Mr. Kenneth Blair, agent for Catalfumo Construction Company, is proposing a change to the DRUPCD, which inchcdes an increase in the amount of regional commercial square footage from 1,390,000 sf. to 1,440,000 sf. and reduces office- business square footage from 1,210,000 to 1,091,800 s. f. and designates particular parcels on the master plan as being potential sites for regional commercial use. The subject property is located north of PGA Boulevard between Alternate AIA and Prosperity Farms Road (5&6-42S-43E) Mr. Kunkle made a motion to continue the Public Hearing for Petition PCD -99 -05 to October 26, 1999. Mr. Cruz seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 7 -0 vote. Workshop PUD- 99 -12• Gardens Corporate Centre Phase 2 Oliver - Glidden & Partners, Inc-, agent for an ownership consortium, is requesting a planned unit development amendment for a 6.6 acre site located at the northeast corner of PHA Boulevard and Alternate AIA. The proposed amendment would include two (2) six story office buildings • (totaling 223,943 square feet) with a separate parking structure (6-42S-43E) Mr. Glidden stepped down due to conflict of interest and was replaced by Alternate Ted Rausch. • Planner John Lindgren reviewed the staff report. In response to a question from Mr. Cruz, Mr. Lindgren clarified that one building 10 stories in height was permitted. Mr. Lindgren explained that responsibility for landscaping in the FDOT right -of -ways needed further clarification. Discussion ensued which included reduced traffic trips as a result of the change in use, and rear and side setback measurements. City Forester Hendrickson reported discussions with the petitioner regarding landscape items and a difference of opinion regarding landscape design along Alternate AIA. Mr. Hendrickson provided a history of this project and explained that FDOT had taken much more roadway than anticipated, leaving a 30 -foot area instead of 55 -foot area in front of this project. The PGA Boulevard Flyover Task Force had not yet provided information that was needed, and it was as yet unknown how the hardscape and landscape would look. A partial landscape plan of the flyover was presented. Mr. Hendrickson explained that maintenance had not yet been finalized. Planner Norquest explained that this petition could not move forward without either final plans from FDOT or conditions of approval designed to cover the City under several different eventualities. Ed Oliver, agent for the petitioner, representing AMA Land Ventures as well as three other ownerships in this request for approval. Mr. Oliver explained the Master Plan, including how and why buildings were oriented, the FDOT taking, and the new boundary. Building materials were D • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes September 28, 1999 reviewed. Mr. Solomon recommended that the new buildings contain more elements of the flagship building, and suggested building the parking garage in one phase. Mr. Solomon questioned the legal structure that would be utilized, to which the petitioner responded that unity of title would be used. It was clarified that colors and materials were consistent with the initial flagship building. Mr. Oliver explained traffic circulation relating to the bank drive- through lane. Mr. Nedvins commented that a project of this magnitude should be broken down by staff into a series of components presented on different nights, such as overview and site plan one night, architectural review another night, etc., in logical, concise order. Other items discussed were the flyover rendering depicting the roof, and easements. Chair Channing commented that more time was needed to consider this project. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business to come before the Commission. NEW BUSINESS is There was no new business to come before the Commission. ITEMS BY CITY COUNCIL LIAISON There were no items by the City Council Liaison. • 10 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes September 28, 1999 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:20 p.m. The next meeting will be held October 1 2,1999. APPROVED: 0 Jackie • rohn Ned "ns, Vice Chair Johr�Gliddok Chair Pro Tern Secretary 11 r. • • COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Please Print _ Name: Address: TO a► �/ 1 � city: 4�/- Ze4j- Subject:: 1q c Members of the public may address the Planning & Zoning Commission during the Public Hearing portion of the agenda. This Request must be delivered to the Secrets to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three ((3)rminutes. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC • REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Please Print Name: f�b��"e5 Av A- t, i2 s Address: City: �n � Subject: `-1 Members of the public may address the Planning & Zoning Commission during the Public Hearing portion of the agenda. This Request must be delivered to the Secretary prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. • Please F Name: _ Address: City: COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC REQUEST TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION a2 -(C, Subject:: 11111,00.1111 11 1 1 Members of the public may address the Planning & Zoning Commission during the Public Hearing portion of the agenda. This Request must be delivered to the Secrets to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3)rminutes. • • 77 FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS 1 \AMI I IRS I \ NII MIDDI I NAMF NAME OF BOARD. C(H1N('iL. COMMISSIO%. AU I HORIi Y.OR COM Mill UE 1.0A1 st, Co ss %I III n(. %I11)RI SS �j IHI• 140ARD.COU. ' I- COMMINSION. M14HORIINOR COMMITTEE ON WHICH 1 SERVE IS A IINIT OF: [i' C' my ❑ COUNTY ❑ Oi HER LOCAL AGENCY Ci IY ('OVNlY �. 1„• / NAME OF POLITiCAL SUBDIVISION: to.. 6- S. DATE ON WHICH VOIF. (x'CIIRRFL) Q, MY POSITION IS: ❑ ELECTIVE APPOINTIVE WHO 'MUST FILE FORM 88 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council. commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143. Florida Statutes. hbur responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before : ompleting ;he re%erse side and filing the form. • INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES ELECTED OFFICERS: .A person holding elect i%e:ounty, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from votine on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a eo %ernment agency) by whom he is retained. In either case, you should disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE DOTE BEING TAKE' by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of \our interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting: and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: ,A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office %9U-ST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must disclose the nature of the conflict before makine am• attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether made by the officer or at his direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE .ANY .ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: •You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. • A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest. , a 111u.. .0 . ,. ". IF YOU N1AKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You should complete the form and file it within 1'5 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the min of ttic meeting. who should 'incorporate the form in the minutes. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST 1 • ��1'�Y V V ► . hereby disclose that on . 19 (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain; or a N j L� LI/inurcd. to the special gain of w'.1�'1%� I' a�1 2- , by whom I am retained. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: rim Date Filed Aoz'�- � Si azure NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317 (1985). A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, RENIOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED 55,000. CE FORM 88 - 1-91 PAGE Z