HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z 062398CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
June 23, 1998
MINUTES
The Regular Meeting of the Planning and zoning Commission of the City
of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, was called to order by Chair Diane.
Carlino 7:30 P.M. in the Assembly Room at the Municipal Complex, 10500
North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and opened with the
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ITEMS BY GROWTB MANAGMUM DIRECTOR
Growth Management Director Roxanne Manning reported a groundbreaking
ceremony had been held that afternoon for the new municipal complex
and that the Military Trail entrance to the site would be closed.
Chair Carlino requested that since agendas were going to be quite
lengthy through December, 1998, that Planning and Zoning Commission
meetings begin 6:30 p.m. Mr. Masters made a motion to begin Planning
and Zoning meetings at 6:30 p.m. The motion was seconded by Mx.
Nedvins, and carried by unanimous 6 -0 vote.
ITEMS BY CITY COUNCIL LIAISON
City Council Liaison Carl Sabatello recommended that it be standard
procedure for Commission members to turn on their microphones when
speaking since people were complaining they could not hear. Mr.
Sabatello commented that at a future meeting he would report to the
Commission what comments were made by the City Council on petitions
they had approved.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Minutes of June 9, 1998 - Mr. Glidden made a motion to approve the
minutes as submitted. Mr. Masters seconded the motion, which carried
by unanimous 6 -0 vote.
X10 Cj', 011,1. N
The roll was called by Jackie Holloman, Secretary for the meeting.
•
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 23, 1998
Present Absent
Chair Diane Carlino Ralph Pisani
Joel Channing, Vice Chair
John Glidden, Chair Pro Tem
Alternate Richard Masters
John Nedvins
Dennis Solomon
Also present at the meeting were Growth Management Director Roxanne
Manning, Assistant City Manager Greg Dunham, City Attorney Carole
Post, Principal Planner Marty Minor, and Principal Planner Kim Glas.
Recommendations to City Council • Petition SP-98 -06 - Ba1lenlsles Parcel
20a b
Henry Skokowski, agent for Ballenlsles Development Company, is seeking
site plan approval for 70 zero lot line single family home lots on
Parcels 20A and 20B within the Ballenlsles Planned Community District
(PCD) . The total land area is 31.17 acres and is located on the south
side of East Island Avenue approximately M mile from Ballenlsles
•Drive. (13114-42R-42S)
Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated June 23,
1998.
Henry Skokowski, agent for the petitioner, explained that lot coverage
calculations had been done and that the largest home on the smallest
lot, which would be a worst case scenario, had 41% lot coverage; that
the project had three specific models, and that he did not believe an
architectural committee could authorize remodeling to add other rooms.
Mr. Masters expressed concern that might happen in the future. Growth
Management Director Manning advised that a staff member had been
assigned to review such matters so that such expansions within PUDs
would not occur. Setbacks were clarified by Mr. Minor. Mr. Skokowski
explained that 10' from the property line would be the worst case
scenario.
Mr. Solomon made a motion to recommend approval of Petition SP -98-06
to the City Council with the following condition:
1. The approval of this petition is contingent upon the approval of
the following waivers:
• 2
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
. June 23, 1998
A. Waiver of Section 114 -202, Roadway surfacing and
improvement.
B. Waiver of Section 118- 201(e), Building lot coverage.
The motion was seconded by Der. Masters and carried by unanimous 6 -0
vote.
VII. Recommendation for Apflroval: Petition SP -98 -07 - Damerau Office Park
Lot 3
A request by Glenn R. Weller, agent, for architectural approval of a
building in the approved Damerau Office Park Planned Unit Development
(PDD) . The building (Building #3) is located on Lot 3 and totals
7,980 square feet. (8- 42S -43S)
Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated June 18,
1998.
Glen R. Weller, agent for the petitioner, presented the project. Mr.
Weller explained the rear of the proposed building would back up to
mangroves and would not be visible. Principal Planner Minor provided
• former elevations for the Committee's review. Mr. Glidden expressed
his opinion that the rear of the building needed improvement, that
there were things on the elevations that were not accurate, suggested
a change in the roof style using a hip roof on the front, and
mirroring front features on the back. Mr. Nedvins expressed agreement
with Mr. Glidden's comments. Committee members did not agree with the
petitioner that the back elevation would be hidden by mangroves was
a valid argument for not adding additional architectural details to
the rear. Discussion ensued. Other comments were that air
conditioning equipment needed to be shown on the plan, and that the
proposed building was much more commercial in nature than the first
building. Requirements in the current ordinance for replacing
landscaping in the event that the mangroves were destroyed were
discussed. Chair Carlino polled the members of the Committee, who
agreed this petitioner should come back with improved architecture.
Direction was provided that moving the small wing on the north end at
least two feet to the west could provide a break in the roof line;
and that a hip roof over the elevator would be an improvement.
Petitioner was requested to provide an accurate depiction of the roof
on an elevation, to use the same architectural features on the rear
as on the front, to bring the floor plan and roof plan to the next
meeting, and to provide a color elevation of the front of the
building, with information regarding colors. The possibility of a
0 3
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
• June 23, 1998
condition changing the approved wrought iron fence material to cast
aluminum was discussed.
Recommendation to City Council: Petition SP -98 -15 - Ballenlsles Parcel
8
Henry Skokowski, agent for Ballenlsles Development Company, is seeking
site plan approval for 12 custom single family home lots on Parcel 8A
within the Ballenlsles Planned Community District (PCD) . The total
land area is 8.55 acres and is located on Fairwinds Avenue, south of
where Fairwinds Avenue terminates at the entrance to Parcel 10.
13114- 42S-42B)
Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated June 23,
1998.
Discussion ensued regarding lot coverages. Mr. Channing expressed
concern that no one would want to construct a PUD if the same
requirements were imposed as for a regular subdivision.
Henry Skokowski, agent for the petitioner, agreed with Mr. Channing,
• and explained that minimum and maximum conditions were established
within PUDs and that not all lot coverages would be the same.
Mr. Channing made a motion to recommend approval of Petition SP -98 -15
to the City Council with the following condition:
1. The approval of this petition is contingent upon the approval of
the following waivers:
A. Waiver of Section 114 -202, Roadway surfacing and
improvement.
B. Waiver of Section 118- 201(e), Building lot coverage.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Masters and carried by unanimous 5 -0
vote.
Recommendation to Citv Council: Petition SP -98 -10 - PGA National
Canterbury Lots 41& 43
A request by .Terry Lev, Owner, for an amendment to the approved site
plan for PGA National Canterbury (Parcel M -24). The original site
plan for lots 41 &43 was approved for a Courtyard model only. The
petitioner is requesting to have an option of either a Courtyard or
0 4
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
• June 23, 1998
a modified Courtyard model for the two lots. The 20 -acre site is
located within the PGA National Planned Community District (PM) . (10-
425- 428)
Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated June 15,
1998.
Jerry Lev, Owner, explained that a change to 20, of open space had
been made.
Mr. Solomon made a motion to recommend approval of Petition SP -98 -10
to the City Council as submitted. Mr. Charming seconded the motion,
which carried by unanimous 6 -0 vote.
Workshop: Petition SP -98 -11 - PGA National Mobil Station
Michael Houston, agent for Hasan Allgayer, is seeking site plan
approval for redesigning the current PGA National Nabil Station. The
total land area consists of 1 acre and is located at the southeast
corner of the intersection of PGA Boulevard and Fairway Drive. (10-
428- 42S)
Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated June 23,
1998.
Michael Houston, agent for the petitioner, presented the project. Mr.
Houston described the current facility and reviewed the proposed
improvements as well as the requested sign waiver. Improvements
described included additional landscaping, reconfigured circulation,
and drainage improvements. Mr. Houston presented photos of the
existing site, the floor plan, and west and south color elevations.
The exterior was proposed to be off -white stucco with a barrel tile
roof, and a sidewalk and crosswalk and canopy would be added. Daniel
Green, Mobil Project Manager, described how the work was planned to
proceed. Mr. Glidden expressed his opinion that the roof over the
pumps should be a full hip roof and an overhang should be added to the
car wash and pump roofs. Access to the site was discussed. At Mr.
Channing's request, signage colors were described. The sign area and
colors were discussed since they did not meet code. The petitioner
agreed to meet the signage area requirement, and explained that some
Mobil officials might want to change this site to a gas station only
instead of a convenience store /car wash /gas facility rather than
change the corporate sign colors. It was explained that the
convenience store had limited food service and limited parking to
40 5
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
. June 23, 1998
discourage customers who were not also gas customers. After further
discussion, Chair Carlino stated that staff would come back with clear
direction regarding sign colors.
Workshop: Petition SP -98 -08 - Viridian Office Centre
A request by Urban Design Studio, agent, for site plan approval of a
professional office building totaling 24,142 square feet. The 1.74 -
acre site is located within the ,MacArthur Center (Regional Center)
Planned Community Development (PCD) . (15-42S-42B)
Mr. Glidden stepped down due to conflict of interest.
Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated June 18,
1998.
Henry Skokowski introduced others present on behalf of the petitioner
,and presented the project. Mr. Skokowski described the entrance to
the facility as not warranting the 100 -foot stacking rule. Other
issues discussed by Mr. Skokowski included waiver requests, dumpster
location, and parking and circulation issues. Keith Spino with Oliver
• Glidden Partners displayed an elevation and color board, and described
the proposed colors and materials. One tenant logo sign had been
required by the MacArthur Foundation. Mr. Channing pointed out
elevations 4 and 6 were mis- numbered. Gary Owens, Landscape
Architect, displayed the landscape plan and explained the proposed
locations of various types of trees. and plants. After discussion of
the dumpster location and objections to the dumpster being located
near the entrance, Mr. Minor commented staff would consult the City
Engineer and Waste Management to assure there was no problem with
servicing the dumpster. A comment was made that the 100 -foot stacking
rule should apply to this project. A poll of the Committee revealed
that a majority was in favor of relocating the dumpster.
Mr. Nedvins left the meeting at this point, at 9:55 p.m.
John Glidden rejoined the meeting at 9:55 p.m.
Workshow: Petition SP- 97 -_13 - Golf Digest Campus (Architecture)
Sank Skokowski, agent for WCi Limited Partnership and Golf Digest, is
requesting a site plan approval for a 26.15 acre "Golf Campus ", a
4.1 acre golf maintenance facility, and two (2) roadways connecting
PGA Boulevard with the golf campus. The site is generally located 314
• 6
•
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 23, 1998
mile north of PGA Boulevard and M mile west of the Florida Turnpike.
(3-42S-42S)
Principal Planner Kim Glas explained that this workshop was held to
address the architecture of the building.
Henry Skokowski, agent for the petitioner, introduced others present
on behalf of the petitioner. Architect Pat Seagraves displayed a 3 -D
model, site plan, elevations, landscape conception, materials and
color board. Discussion ensued. Comments by Mr. Glidden included
size of the cupola, and roof design; and suggested the back drop -off
area be straight back to the pavilion, which could be moved farther
back. Mr. Glidden requested a photo of the roof material. Mr.
Masters suggested the addition of emergency generators and
refrigerated garbage containers, and that exhaust be vented through
the roof.
The roll was called by Jackie Holloman, Secretary for the meeting.
Present Absent
Chair Diane Carlino Ralph Pisani
Joel Channing, Vice Chair John Nedvins
John Glidden, Chair Pro Tem
Alternate Richard Masters
Dennis Solomon
Workshop: Petition POD -96 -01 - Golf Digest PCD Rezoning
A request by Hank Skokowski, agent for WCI Communities and JCB Golf
Ventures, for rezoning from Planned Development Area (PDA) to Planned
Community District (PCD) . The proposed Golf Digest PCD Includes 1995
residential units, 105,000 s. f. of office, 50,000 s. f. of commercial,
a golf campus with training center, golf clubbouse amenities and
maintenance facilities, two 18 -bole championship courses and a 9 -hole
par 3 abort course, 10,000 s. f. of community facility space, a city
fire /police station and 15 -acre city park, a 32- acre elementary and
middle acbool site, and over 800 acres of wetland and upland
preserves. The 2,305 -acre site is located north of PGA Blvd, west of
Florida's Turnpike, east of the Loxabatcbee Slough and soutb of Hood
7
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 23, 1998
Road. !3, 4 &5- 42S -42S and 32, 33 &34 -41S -4251
Principal Planner Kim Glas reviewed the staff report dated June 23,
1998, and discussed building heights. Chair Carlino requested that
all of the issues regarding this petition be listed so that the
Commissioners could write them down and comment on each one. Ms. Glas
explained the parkway issue and that staff would recommend utilities
be placed underground within the,road right -of -way so that even in the
worst case scenario there would be 5 feet to landscape between the
pathway and the road right -of -way. Ms. Glas displayed and reviewed
a phasing plan for completion of the parkway tied to when the road
must go through, when the sidewalk must go in, and when landscaping
must be installed. Ms. Glas indicated the petitioner had not modified
the aggressive build -out date and had not indicated that date would
be changed. City Forester Mark Hendrickson favored a requirement for
a 25' buffer between residential pods, which Ms. Glas stated would be
a staff recommendation. Ms. Glas explained that staff had compromised
on detailed landscape and buffer plans by postponing that requirement
for 9 months after PCD approval. City Forester Hendrickson
recommended preserving Pod "W° as a preserve area and accomplishing
• that density elsewhere in the project. Buffer details would be
required between Pod "W° and old Marsh. Ms. Glas reported another
issue not yet clarified to staff was the interface between wetlands
and lakes and whether the lakes would draw down the wetlands, which
was an issue initially raised by the City's Environmental Consultant.
Ms. Glas explained that a condition of approval would be requirement
of grading plans for the golf course before any work was done in that
area. Staff would encourage preservation of native species in the
required landscape plans for the golf area. Ms. Glas requested the
Commissioners advise of any remaining issues they felt needed to be
addressed before final consideration of this petition.
Mr. Solomon stated he had no problems with the building height and
suggested trying to get the County to remove Jog Road extension from
their thoroughfare plan; expressed his opinion that 401 was an
adequate buffer and that buffer width could be placed in documents;
questioned whether school sites would be offered for a price and for
a limited amount of time; stated that the northern ingress /egress
should be closer to the school and park site; and questioned who owned
the roads -- public and maintained by the County or taken over by the
Master Association and who would then pay for maintenance; whether the
lakes would be lined; whether irrigation quality water would be used
to water the golf courses and the greenbelt area; whether the Corps
0 8
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 23, 1998
of Army Engineers had jurisdiction and was permitting in wetland
areas; and commented that if Pod "W' was not under jurisdiction of a
governmental agency he believed the developer should be able to use
that land for residential purposes. '
Mr. Glidden stated he had no problem with Pod "W' as it was; questioned
the comparisons of building heights since Bascom Palmer was shown to
top of roof and the others to top of parapet, and expressed his
opinion that all heights should be reasonably consistent. In response
to Mr. Glidden's questions regarding the price of the school sites,
Attorney Post responded that issue had not yet been resolved. Mr.
Glidden expressed his opinion that three years was not a long enough
period for the school sites to be offered, and recommended that if the
School Board turned down the sites within the first period of time
then private schools should be given the same opportunity. Mr.
Glidden questioned the FAR for the commercial site, to which Ms. Glas
responded it was approximately .25. Mr. Glidden commented Fairway
Center took a FAR of .33 and put it into four stories; and taking this
down to a FAR of .25 and putting it into a lower building was quite
a different scenario and gave some justification for still keeping the
limit of the height down; and that Fairway Center had the advantage
• of making their FAR seem a lot lower than it was by including the
lake, and their real FAR was probably nearer to .45 in a 4 -story
building, which compared to a FAR of .25 in a 5 -story building was not
really untenable, and that he would be most comfortable in the
neighborhood of five stories, which in this case would provide an
enormous amount of green space.
Mr. Masters commented that
was a high -rise life safety
75' in height in order to
all life safety measures.
height was set at 70'
requirement.
when building height approached 751 there
issue, and he would rather see a building
obtain the advantage of full treatment of
Mr. Masters stated that if the building
he would recommend a 75' life safety
Mr. Channing commented his position was a question of character, and
his feeling on the height was that every time a new project came in
for consideration the pressure was greater to go higher. Regarding
Pod "W', Mr. Channing expressed his opinion that if the land was not
environmentally sensitive than the developer should be able to use it.
Mr. Channing questioned what percentage of the road had a smaller than
required buffer because in a lot of places the buffer was much larger
than required. Mr. Skokowski responded that the water areas and park
space had not been included as green space and pointed out different
• 9
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
• June 23, 1998
widths of buffering on the plan and adjoining open space and limited
water; and explained that the only time the minimum condition was used
was when there was a development parcel abutting the roadway, and
those were areas which were not centered. Mr. Channing expressed
sympathy with the 40' buffer areas because of the other areas which
were so much more than required. Mr. Channing stated he did not know
why there was a time limit. of three years for the School Board to act
on the school sites. Mr. Channing questioned why anyone would have
an over- agressive build -out period, to which Mr. Skokowski responded
the builder had an obligation under City code to live up to the date
they selected as a build -out date or be placed under further
requirements.
Chair Carlino questioned whether the lakes would be lined and if IQ
water would be used from Seacoast to water the golf course. Mr.
Skokowski responded that Seacoast did have IQ water available but not
enough for common areas, so that the petitioner wished to landscape
those areas as xeriscapes to minimize the need for irrigation. Mr.
Skokowski reported the lakes were not lined and water from the
reservoirs would not be dumped into the canals but would be contained
in the reserviors and allowed to percolate back into the ground. A
• full water management system was being developed,and would be further
discussed with staff. Mr. Skokowski stated that all of the road
right -of -way would be dedicated to Palm Beach County, while all
internal roads would be privately maintained roadways, except possibly
where there was access to the school sites.
Mr. Glidden commended staff for the way this project was being
processed.
Ms. Glas announced the Public Hearing for this project would be held
at 7:30 p.m. on June 30.
Mr. Skokowski requested flexibility on the buffer width for parcels
V and U, and that the issue of whether a buffer was necessary be
addressed at the final site plan review, which was agreeable to the
Commission.
Comprebensi ve Plan ORC Response Documen t
Principal Planner Kim Glas explained that the ORC report had been
issued by the Department of Community Affairs, and through this
process all comments and objections from regulatory review agencies
• 10
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 23, 1998
were considered. The ORC report then presented outstanding issues
needing to be addressed by the City before adoption. Only nine
objections had been listed, none of which were major. Ms. Glas
pointed out that a question had been raised whether there was a non-
residential classification of mixed use development, which had been
discussed by the City Council, and taking their comments into
consideration criteria had subsequently been developed for projects
where residential could be waived. Intensity measures had then been
developed. Ms. Glas requested that the Commissioners consider this
subject and provide any input to staff. In response to Mr. Channing's
observation that a minimum of two floors were required, Ms. Glass
pointed out the special definition which required at least 25% of the
net building area to be designated for residential use located above
the ground floor.
OLD BUSINESS
There was no old business to come before the Commission.
NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business to come before the Commission.
• 11
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
June 23, 1998
ADJOURI3NT
There being no further business, upon motion by Mr. Channing, seconded
by Mr. Glidden, and unanimously carried, the meeting was adjourned at
11:10 p.m. The next meeting will be held June 30, 1998.
APPROVED:
Diane _C�no, Chair
J5z(elAbroiffng, vice Qhair
Chair Pro Tem
• John Nedvins
Absent
Ralph Pisani
AJ
Dennis Solomon
Gsj- `% /saw✓
chard Masters, Alternate
Ja k e Holloman, Secretary
0 12
%I;f-v IC OFFICERS
' l�Ati: 'hl,ME —FIRST NAML —MID t k NAM NAME OF' t1QARUl COUNCIL. COMMISSION. AUTHORITY, oR COMMITT
�?-- \ . �.._• �Q- tJ �S � 1� �����+�+:. /� ri-� Iv�r:., r�- 1�n,m.
NAICtIK: AUDRt bs C;a& I
Cl TN
4t �.f
w'HICIt Volt (X•l'URRI-0
3��• - c�(n�Nn
��
II: UCIARtx COUNHL. COMMISSION.�AUTHORITY, R COMMI fOf
4ERVt IS A UNIT OP
CI l V COUNTY CITHER IO('At AGENCY
PUt ITICAI. SUBUIVISION:
MY PUSI1'ION Is:
. ELK1IVE PPoINTIvE
WHO MUST FILE FORM 88
This form is for use by any person ser%ing at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected boar(
council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presenle
with a voting conflict of interest udder Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; althous
the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by la-A
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly dependin
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please. pay close attention to the instructions on this forr
before completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
ELECTED OFFICERS:
A person holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inure
his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the speciz
in of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained.
In either case, you should disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING; TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure o.
which you are abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN IS DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recordin.
the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure whict
inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to th
special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained.
A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but mus
disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whethe
made by the officer or at his direction.
IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICF
THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN:
• You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible fo
recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes.
• A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
the foim should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest
1 f IN \I rb let." PA.
IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
• You should complete the form and file it within IS days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the miaut
of the meeting. who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
"Sn � � l9' �I k��
1. 10.—__ .hereby disclose that on
. 19 q _4
(a) A asure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
inured to my special private gain: or n
inured to the special gain of Pa*0 .� _ _ , by whom I am retainec
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows:
�-(kC�- C
yV�v� XyVn ✓e�Ve�w�"s 41A 'is
•
'2- -� �1 (5 _
Date Filed
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES $112.317 (1983). A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRE
DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING
IMPEACHMENT. REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION I.
OALARY . . REPRIMAND. OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $3.000. 1
0 FORM so • 1046 ��