Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z 011497CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION January 14, 1997 MINUTES The Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, was called to order by Chairman Carl Sabatello at 7 :30 P.M. in the Assembly Room at the Municipal Complex, 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. The roll was called by Secretary Jackie Holloman: Present Absent Carl Sabatello John Nedvins Diane Carlino John Glidden Chris Jones William Mignogna Tom Paganini Thomas Pastore Jeff Ornstein appeared at the meeting, but left since there was a quorum. Also present at the meeting were Planning and Zoning Director Richard Walton, Assistant City Attorney Paul Golis, Assistant City Manager Greg Dunham, Principal Planner Marty Minor, and Planner Edward Tombari. ITEMS BY PLANNING AND ZONING DIRECTOR There were no items by the Planning and Zoning Director. ITEMS BY CITY COUNCIL LIAISON There were no items by the City Council Liaison. Minutes of December 16, 1996 - Vice Chair Carlino made a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Mr. Paganini seconded the motion, which carried by vote of 5 -0, with abstentions by Chairman Sabatello and Mr. Mignogna. Workshog : Petition SP-96-1 by Sen,ry Skokowskf , agent for • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 1997 BallenIsles Development Corporation, is requesting site plan approval for the construction of 34 single - ,family detached custom built units on 11.76 acres on Parcel 7 in the BallenIsles Planned Community District (PCD). (11- 42S-42F) Chairman Sabatello stated that he was a builder in BallenIsles and was not affiliated with this project., Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated January 9, 1997. In response to Chairman Sabatello's question, Mr. Minor explained the chart on page two of the staff report. Mr. Henry Skokowski, agent for the petitioner, commented that this project had been reviewed in detail at a prior meeting, and the only waiver requested was for paver blocks. Mr. Skokowski commented on the chart in the staff report that 5 units per acre was probably not correct for this project. Mr. Skokowski explained that height restrictions were accepted by the petitioner. Time of installation for the 5' sidewalks and their locations was discussed. Chairman Sabatello requested that a note be made on plans in the future. Mr. Miqnoqna questioned whether there would be extra landscaping where the • sides of houses were on BallenIsles Drive. It was explained that there would be a 25 -foot landscape berm outside the parcel boundary, and Mr. Skokowski commented that whatever standards which had been adopted for a residential lot for number of trees required would also apply to this project. Chairman Sabatello commented that BallenIsles' Architectural Review Committee had historically looked closely at lots along BallenIsles Drive in regard to massing, landscaping, window locations, etc. vice Chair Carlin made a motion to recommend approval of Petition SP- 96-14 to the City Council with the following recommendations: 1. The temporary sales office /administrative center (former model home) adjacent to the site shall be removed within 120 days of the Certificate of Occupancy for the Ballenisles Club House. 2. The final surface water management system, that is necessary to serve Parcel 7, shall be constructed with Parcel 7 in accordance with the Conceptual SFMW Permit. This entire system shall be completed including a legal positive outfall prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 1997 3. The roadway providing legal access to Parcel 7 shall be constructed and open to the public prior to the issuance of a Certificate of occupancy for the first residential unit and also prior to allowing access to model homes. 4. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit and plat recordation, all applicable regulatory permits shall be obtained. S. The maximum height for all structures in Parcel 7 shall be 36 feet. 6. A waiver shall be granted to allow the use of paver block on privately owned and maintained streets. 7. The sidewalk construction timetable shall be added to the plan prior to presentation to City Council. The motion was seconded by Mr. Jones, and passed by unanimous 7/0 vote. • Workshgys Petition SP- 96 -15, by Henry Skokowski, agent for Sal l enlsl es Development C.'arpora ti on, is requesting site plan approval for the construction of 23 single - family detached custom built units on 9.25 acres on Parcel 25b in the Ballentsles Planned Community District (PCD) . (13-42S-428) Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated January 9, 1997, and noted that the applicant was requesting two waivers and that the reference to Parcel 7 in staff recommendations 4 and 5 should be corrected to Parcel 25b. Planning and Zoning Director Walton explained that Seacoast Utilities had placed the developer on notice years ago regarding the well location requirement and now that this pod was being developed was requesting resolution prior to construction of the site. During discussion of the CBS wall and fence, Director Walton commented that the detailed buffer cross sections on the original approval showed nothing going through the buffer. Henry Skokowski, agent for the petitioner, briefly described the property and the project and requested a waiver for the use of paver blocks. Mr. Skokowski referred to the Site Analysis chart on page 3 of the staff report and cited the code requirement for minimum setback • 3 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 1997 of a side facing street shown as 20 feet. A waiver allowing a 10 -foot setback was requested due to the unique nature of the site, where there was a 12 -foot separation between the lot property line and the landscape buffer. Discussion ensued regarding setbacks for different lots. Mr. Minor advised that setbacks were measured from the building to the property line. Mr. Skokowski requested that a 3 -1/2 foot setback waiver be granted in the event there were two two -story buildings across the street. Chairman Sabatello questioned whether a waiver for only a 3 -1/2 foot difference was necessary, to which Mr. Skokowski responded that the petitioner believed the waiver was applicable in the development of this project. Mr. Skokowski stated that the petitioner was concerned regarding imposition of the condition by Seacoast and did not feel 'it was the applicant's obligation to provide; however, the applicant was agreeing to the condition because it was recommended by the City Engineer. Chairman Sabatello questioned whether the applicant objected to extending the wall to the north, to which Mr. Skokowski responded that the applicant would agree to what was decided by staff. Director Walton clarified that there was no change from the original approval which stated that the PCD buffer area would be maintained by BallenIsles just the same as if there were a fence. • vice Chair Carlin made a motion to recommend approval of Petition SP- 96-15 to the City Council with the following recommendations: 1. The Site Plan shall reflect the location of a well for Seacoast Utilities Authority with the understanding that the said well can be relocated to an alternative site mutually agreed upon between the applicant and Seacoast Utility Authority. Any alternative site (generally located between Holly Drive and Merrill Canal, lying crest of Military Trail) must be determined prior to submission of final construction plans and plat. 2. The section of the 6 foot high CBS wall located in the PCD buffer at the northeast corner of the site shall be replaced with a chain link fence. This conforms with the current approval for this segment of the PCD buffer. 3. The maximum height for all structures in Parcel 25b shall be 36 feet. 4. The final surface water management system, that is necessary to serve Parcel 7, shall be constructed with Parcel 25b in accordance with the Conceptual SFMID Permit. This entire system 0 4 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 1997 shall be completed including a legal positive outfall prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. S. The roadway providing legal access to Parcel 25b shall be constructed and open to the public prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the first residential unit and also prior to allowing access to model homes. 6. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit and plat recordation, all applicable regulatory permits shall be obtained. 7. A waiver shall be granted to allow use of paver block on privately owned and maintained streets. 8. A waiver shall be granted for side corner setbacks as follows: Lots 14 and 15 - 10 feet; Lots 6 through 23 - 7 -1/2 feet; and a minimum pavement setback of 74 -1/2 feet. Mr. Mignogna seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 7/0 vote. Workshoo: Petition SP- 96 -16, by 8enneth A. Blair, agent for LRP Publications, Sac., requesting site plan approval for the construction of 123,379 square feet of office and 45,100 square -feet of warehouse facility on 9.97 + 1- acres on Lot 5 and a portion of Lot 6 of PGA National Commerce Park within PGA National Planned Community District (PCD) . (15-42S-42B) Mr. Mignogna stepped down due to a conflict as he was the Structural Engineer for this project. Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated January 9, 1997. It was noted that both of the buffers would need to be approved prior to this petition approval and that those two petitions had been submitted and were going through the process. In response to a question of regarding the high -end residential rental units were located, Mr. Minor indicated the area on a map. The adjacent property and roads were also indicated. Kenneth A. Blair, agent for the petitioner, commented on open issues, including parking and stated that the petitioner would meet parking requirements. The waiver for three loading spaces was requested to • ,5 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 1997 accommodate Federal Express, UPS; and Postal Service trucks. Mr. Blair indicated that the applicant would comply with the requirement that no drainage retention be within the landscape areas or within medians. Mr. Blair introduced Jim Martini with LRP Publications. Chairman Sabatello welcomed Mr. Martini to Palm Beach Gardens and thanked him for choosing the City as their southern headquarters. Mr. Pastore questioned whether LRP would occupy all the phases so that the loading zone waiver would apply to the entire proposed site plan, to which the response was affirmative, although phases 4 and 5 did show loading bays so that the waiver would apply primarily to Phases I & II. Mr. Pastore requested a landscape plan which would apply to everything while Phase I was being constructed. Mr. Blair expressed that there would be no problem providing a Phase I landscape plan, however, expressed concern that since Phase II was planned to quickly follow Phase I he would hate to see a lot of landscaping required along the entire western border which would have to be moved. Mr. Blair suggested that in lieu of that landscaping that a bond could be required that the landscaping be installed within a specified time period. Chairman Sabatello suggested that a mechanism be worked out with staff in the case that Phase II did not go forward by a certain date, landscaping would be identified which would be installed by a specified date; and also the how the undeveloped areas not included in Phase I would be maintained. Mr. Pastore commented that his concern had been triggered by the possibility that the land clearing work might not stay within the Phase I boundaries. Chairman Sabatello advised the petitioner that a landscape plan was needed for Phase I. One member of the Committee expressed the opinion that massive buildings would require larger landscape materials. Access to Phases III and IV was indicated on the plan. Chairman Sabatello requested that the applicant provide color samples for the buildings, window frames, accent colors, canopies, etc. Mr. Glidden commented that roof mounted equipment would need to be screened from line of sight, defined that if the equipment was six feet above the roof then the screen wall would need to be six feet above the roof. Curbing, parapet wall, and the need for a location map were discussed. Clarification of the canopy height and material shown on the west elevation was requested. Expansion of the noting system was requested on the warehouse elevations. if scuppers were to be used they should also be shown on the elevations. More information regarding material to be used for different items was requested, such as the truck well; and possibly more dimensions to be added to the site plan, unless 0 6 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 1997 staff was comfortable with the current plan. A better network of sidewalks to get people out of the driveways earlier was recommended, by Mr. Glidden, especially in the southwest and northeast corners, to prevent people having to walk long distances through the parking lot. Another area noted just to the south of the Phase IV warehouse was a sidewalk which stopped at a handicap space, which could be continued. Mr. Glidden also requested that the sidewalks on this site match up with sidewalks on adjacent sites. Chairman Sabatello requested that lines on the site plan be clarified as to their meaning. Chairman Sabatello questioned whether the applicant would have a problem with a condition stating that if the loading area waiver caused traffic circulation problems that a loading are then be required. Mr. Blair expressed no problem with such a condition. Jim Martini explained that LRP Publications was a publishing company which produced legal and business newsletters, books, and bound business and professional documents. The Phase I and II buildings would house the marketing staff, human resources, editorial staff, some data entry production staff so that they would primarily be used for office -type functions. Distribution in those phases would be through telephone line transmittals to their northern facility. Chairman Sabatello requested that the lighting for Phase I and outside Phase I be shown on the lighting plan,. Chairman Sabatel-lo questioned whether the applicant understood the turnpike buffer issue and that this petition could not go forward until that was resolved. Mr. Blair indicated that he would converse with staff on that matter. Mr. Glidden requested that a floor plan be provided to clarify the use of the Phase III loading area. V, Vbt • 61,,,, e Wor shoos Petition CU- 96 -06, by Joseph J. verdone, agent for Mecca Farms, Inc., is requesting a conditional use approval to amend table Z and table 2 of Resolution 125, 1995, which approved a conditional use for the existing and proposed agricultural uses. (36 -41S -428) Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated January 9, 1997. Planning and Zoning Director Walton added that truck storage desired for more than one truck would need to be approved. Joe Verdone, agent for Mecca Farms, Inc., indicated that the applicant 7 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 1997 agreed with most of the staff comments, and provided a brief background history. Mr. Verdone indicated that Mecca Farms had had to vacate their Donald Ross Road location much sooner than anticipated due to the Abacoa project development, and had relocated their fruit and vegetable stand. Mr. Verdone explained that previously Mecca Farms had operated under County regulations, and that some of the City requirements were different, such as requiring tiedowns- -with which the applicant had no problem. Mr. Verdone commented that the applicant would update the existing site plan to show railroad ties or fencing per staff preference, to keep vehicles from the pine tree area. The plan would also be amended to reflect minimum code requirements to comply with perimeter landscaping along Hood Road, and to show the planting area around the sign. Mr. Verdone stated that the applicant desired to be a good neighbor. Mr. Verdone stated that the applicant did not agree with removal of existing vegetation at this point since this site was a farm which was constantly being plowed, and after its eight -year interim use the City would have a chance to review and require removal at that point. Mr. Verdone addressed traffic concerns, agreed to provide a 25 -foot wide paved area over the existing NPBWCD canal and to provide a 30 -foot • turnout radius as requested by the City Engineer, which would be reflected on the plans. Mr. Verdone requested a waiver for mulch parking within the fruit and vegetable area, which would be used for two 6 -week periods during the growing cycle, andstated agreement to a condition regarding that length of time. Planning and Zoning Director Walton questioned County requirements concerning produce coming from,off -site. Mr. Verdone agreed to bring a letter from the County to clarify their requirements. Truck storage was discussed, which would need to be approved. The applicant agreed to comply with City regulations regarding public facilities, which would be provided by Porta Pottie or a similar concern. Mr. Verdone indicated that the applicant would work with staff regarding parking and paving, and noted that this was an interim use rather than a final use. Mr. Verdone explained that a security trailer for the property was planned where security personnel would be on duty 24 hours per day, and that the applicant was primarily before the Commission to request amendment to the tables in Resolution 125, 1995. Chairman Sabatello indicated that the Commission would require more information regarding County regulations for security trailers. Mr. Verdone indicated that hours of operation for picking vegetables and the stand would be sunup to sundown, which would be noted when addressing this matter. Discussion of the present operation ensued. Mr. Verdone indicated that a well and septic system would be provided for the security trailer if • a Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 1997 someone was in residence 24 hours a day. The possibility of deleting the security trailer from the application was discussed. Mr. Verdone indicated that no problems had been experienced with people using the property at night for other purposes, except for kids walking through the fields. Mr. Pastore questioned whether the wooden sign stayed up year round, to which Mr. Verdone responded the applicant would agree to take the sign down after the growing season had ended. Discussion ensued how regulation of incoming off -site fruit and vegetables could be accomplished. Mr. Verdone agreed to work with staff regarding that matter. Workshgp : Petition P&W - 9 6 - D 7, by Henry Skokowski, agent for Amstar Texas Pool, Ltd., is requesting a Planned Unit Development approval for the expansion and renovation of the Holiday InnImacArthur's Vineyard hotel complex. The Hol i day Inn is located at the northwest corner of the PGA Boulevard /Zbterertoto 95 interchange. (1- 425 -429) Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated January 8, 1997. • Henry Skokowski, agent for the petitioner, explained that this project centered around the need to rezone the property to a PUD because of the PGA Boulevard Overlay District. Mr. Skokowski commented that Amstar had purchased the property last year and desired to upgrade the building, landscaping, and signage so that the remodeling could be in place by October, 1997. The PGA Overlay requirements might require rezoning the entire area up to I -95, however, that would not change any other aspects of the planned renovations. Mr. Skokowski explained that if the City had a concern regarding the east access driveway that the applicant was willing to reconfigure the site, if necessary, and operate with only the western access. Mr. Skokowski expressed the hope that this petition might be presented at an advertised public hearing in approximately 30 days. Mr. Skokowski indicated that some signs would be eliminated and others scaled down, although hotel siqnaqe was very important. Mr. Skokowski introduced those present at the meeting who were associated with this project. Lynn McBroom, Amstar Group. Ltd. representative, expressed pleasure with the City's managed growth and commented that the number one priority for the group was to accomplish the renovation in a timely manner and that they were very willing to work with staff to work out issues. Tim Fish, Architect with Cooper Cary Architects, displayed a photo of the existing hotel and a depiction of the proposed exterior • 9 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 1997 elevation. Proposed landscaping improvements and building renovations were described. Mr. Skokowski explained that if the original approval required that all of the land be included in the requested rezoning that none of the project improvements would be affected; however, the legal description would have to be changed and it would be noted that any future development of the north lot would be a part of the PUD process. Mr. Skokowski discussed possible waivers in regard to (1) whether a buffer would need to be added at this time on the northern property, (2) a few places which did not meet the requirement that there be a tree within 40 feet of any parking space, and (3) places where there was insufficient room'to plant a tree. Mr. Fish indicated that problem areas of the building had been identified from code standpoints, ADA, waterproofing, and other conditions. Mr. Fish explained that the present port cochere was too low to accommodate fire - fighting equipment; the color was undesirable, and there were problems with how the water flowed off the existing precast beams. The .new proposal included recoating the entire building with an exterior insulation and finish system, creating new cornices, cutting off existing precast beams to clean up fascias, constructing a new 141611 high port cochere, upgrading existing . balconies, adding mullions to dress up window areas, adding an arcade to tie the building areas together, uplighting balconies from the ground with white lighting, replacing all existing globe lights with updated fixtures, and adding a decorative roof - mounted spire. Colors samples were submitted. All window and door frames were to be bronze except certain setback areas which had silver colored anodized aluminum frames; all quest rooms and public areas were to be updated; doors would be replaced where needed; landscaping would be added around the base of the building consisting of Sabal, Coconut, and Date palms; and smaller rooftop units would be installed and placed near the center of the roof to reduce the sight line. The applicant was advised that rooftop units must be screened and the elevations must reflect the screening of the units. It was suggested that placing the screenwall right around the equipment would be suitable. The applicant indicated that Phase I and the interior would be done at the same time. Chairman Sabatello expressed concern with pedestrian circulation on the site. The applicant described proposed reconfiguration of the.pedestrian circulation. Discussion of the traffic circulation problems ensued. Eric Sise, General Manager of the hotel, explained that a big part of the parking problem was identifying the use of Building B and C entrances to hotel guests so that they would use those entrances instead of going through the lobby. Another issue was having a bellman at the front to make sure • 10 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 1997 parking in the front lot was not abused during happy hour, which would be addressed during the renovation by reduction of the lounge facility. The applicant was requested to address possible identification for entrances other than the front entrance. Mr. Pastore commented that the existing balcony steel was faded from full exposure to the sun. Mr. Jones commented that the building spire must be distinguishable as a building feature rather than appearing to be an antenna. Mr. Skokowski displayed and reviewed existing and proposed signage, and explained that variances had been approved in the past for some of the signs. The five signs now on the street would be replaced with only two, and a waiver would be requested from the required 50 -ft. setback from I -95. Another sign would be proposed in an island. There was extensive discussion in regard to the signage. Mr. Skokowski commented that he would request that the applicant to think about the heights of those signs. Entrance and directional signs were described, as well as other wall signs. Mr Skokowski requested three signs versus the four now at the top of the building. Another sign was proposed for hotel identification on the port cochere. Planning and Zoning Director Walton suggested that staff look at the sign code • and advise the applicant. Chairman Sabatello advised the applicant to be as close as possible to the sign code and to have good reasons for any variations. Mr. Skokowski explained that the applicant would address reducing the number of waivers, and would like to return for an advertised public hearing in 30 days. Chairman Sabatello requested review of the PGA entrance to make it an easier entry to negotiate. Kayhart Pinder agreed that the entry would be reviewed. Mr. Walton commented that the Military Trail entrance did not lend itself to driving directly to the front entrance of the hotel. Chairman Sabatello suggested that both entrances were week and should be addressed. K=kshou: Petition CU- 96 -o8, by Slattery and Root Architects, agent for Temple Beth David, for the expansion and renovation of the existing Temple Beth. David site. This petition would amend existing Conditional Use in an RL -1 residential low density district. Temple Beth David is located at 4657 Hood Road between Military Trail and Central Boulevard. (36- 41S-42S) Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated January 8, 1997. • 11 Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 1997 Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated January 8, 1997. Mr. Glidden commented that a roof plan was needed. Mr. Glidden questioned why a port cochere must be 131 -6" so that emergency vehicles could get under it and requested further information. Douglas Root of Slattery and Root Architects, representative for the petitioner, presented elevations and reviewed the elements of the project. A roof plan was requested. Any rooftop equipment was requested to be screened. The applicant was advised to note all finishes and colors, and to bring color samples to the next presentation. The scale of the freestanding menorah logo was requested. Parking was briefly discussed. The applicant was advised that enough paved spaces would be needed to handle worst -case daily use, and that a numerical analysis to justify requested parking would be needed. Chairman Sabatello advised that the applicant needed to address colors, details in the site plan, and grass parking; and that staff would probably make additional requests at the next meeting. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business to come before the Commission. There was no new business to come before the Commission. • 12 • Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes January 14, 1997 ADJOIIRNI�NT There being no further business, upon motion by Mr. Glidden, seconded by Mr. Miqnoqna, and unapaUkously carried, the meeting was adjourned at 11:20 P.M. The next ee inq will be held January 28, 1997. APPROVED: anatel.io, cnairman Tli inn T7i nc 01-1 = 4 r 0l 1 Ar7c» TAT l l i am Mi rr »nrrn7 ThnmaO �tnrc Damn i »i f''hri �tnnhcr .Tnnpc ) Jeff Ornstein, Alternate (Absent) John Nedvins, Alternate .T. _, -- i o 'ar-O l n-I Ccnro} -zrer 13 OUNTY, MUNICIPAL AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS I.A1:' NAME —FIRST NAME— MIDI)IE NAME NAVF 110ARLk COUNCIL. COMMISSION. AUTHORITY. OR COMMITTE: 04 %SA.%AW% Co. %iAILIN4 ADDRESS THE I50ARLX COUNCIL. COMMISSION. AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE ON S�Q Ci���ii4 � ' WHI ' 1 SERVE IS A UNIT OF: G, I couNTY OTHER I OC'At AGENCY t'Ot IN r% �A1L 111. 11 ITIC'AL YUBDIVISION: Tt'CtorJ p -�<. -1 G. UAJ E ON WHIC'II VOI t lX'c'URRI-D MY 1'U511'InN 15: ELECTIVE APPOINTIv WHO MUST FILE FORM 85 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presentee with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; althougi the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly dependink on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please. pay close attention to the instructions on this four before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES ELECTED OFFICERS: person holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inure o his special private gain. Each local ufficer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the specia gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. In either case, you should disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure or which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN IS DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure whicr inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate: in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but mus disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whethe' made by the officer or at his direction. lF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICi- THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: • You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible fo recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. .� copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest 1 f III%1 ry III•MA PA. a w I.t • _ IF %U MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You should complete the form and rile it within IS days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minute- of the meeting. who should incorporate the form in the minutes. ��\ M DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST 1. �+1��►t� s` `��'+ __ , hereby disclose that on k' \094';' .19-44 � (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) `/ inured to my special private gain; or inured to the special gain of (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: , by whom I am retained 5: \ P'm <we SI-Mocm umpe. SVIA4 Peer- ",Tko ?T&V�,VTW-7 0 Cr on Date Filed Signature NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES $112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRE +DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT. DEMOTION. REDUCTION I., SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5.000. a FORM is • 10.86 Pr