HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z 011497CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
January 14, 1997
MINUTES
The Regular Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City
of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, was called to order by Chairman Carl
Sabatello at 7 :30 P.M. in the Assembly Room at the Municipal Complex,
10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and opened
with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
The roll was called by Secretary Jackie Holloman:
Present Absent
Carl Sabatello John Nedvins
Diane Carlino
John Glidden
Chris Jones
William Mignogna
Tom Paganini
Thomas Pastore
Jeff Ornstein appeared at the meeting, but left since there was a
quorum.
Also present at the meeting were Planning and Zoning Director Richard
Walton, Assistant City Attorney Paul Golis, Assistant City Manager
Greg Dunham, Principal Planner Marty Minor, and Planner Edward
Tombari.
ITEMS BY PLANNING AND ZONING DIRECTOR
There were no items by the Planning and Zoning Director.
ITEMS BY CITY COUNCIL LIAISON
There were no items by the City Council Liaison.
Minutes of December 16, 1996 - Vice Chair Carlino made a motion to
approve the minutes as submitted. Mr. Paganini seconded the motion,
which carried by vote of 5 -0, with abstentions by Chairman Sabatello
and Mr. Mignogna.
Workshog : Petition SP-96-1 by Sen,ry Skokowskf , agent for
• Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 14, 1997
BallenIsles Development Corporation, is requesting site plan approval
for the construction of 34 single - ,family detached custom built units
on 11.76 acres on Parcel 7 in the BallenIsles Planned Community
District (PCD). (11- 42S-42F)
Chairman Sabatello stated that he was a builder in BallenIsles and was
not affiliated with this project.,
Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated January
9, 1997. In response to Chairman Sabatello's question, Mr. Minor
explained the chart on page two of the staff report.
Mr. Henry Skokowski, agent for the petitioner, commented that this
project had been reviewed in detail at a prior meeting, and the only
waiver requested was for paver blocks. Mr. Skokowski commented on the
chart in the staff report that 5 units per acre was probably not
correct for this project. Mr. Skokowski explained that height
restrictions were accepted by the petitioner. Time of installation
for the 5' sidewalks and their locations was discussed. Chairman
Sabatello requested that a note be made on plans in the future. Mr.
Miqnoqna questioned whether there would be extra landscaping where the
• sides of houses were on BallenIsles Drive. It was explained that
there would be a 25 -foot landscape berm outside the parcel boundary,
and Mr. Skokowski commented that whatever standards which had been
adopted for a residential lot for number of trees required would also
apply to this project. Chairman Sabatello commented that BallenIsles'
Architectural Review Committee had historically looked closely at lots
along BallenIsles Drive in regard to massing, landscaping, window
locations, etc.
vice Chair Carlin made a motion to recommend approval of Petition SP-
96-14 to the City Council with the following recommendations:
1. The temporary sales office /administrative center (former
model home) adjacent to the site shall be removed within
120 days of the Certificate of Occupancy for the
Ballenisles Club House.
2. The final surface water management system, that is
necessary to serve Parcel 7, shall be constructed with
Parcel 7 in accordance with the Conceptual SFMW Permit.
This entire system shall be completed including a legal
positive outfall prior to issuance of the first Certificate
of Occupancy.
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 14, 1997
3. The roadway providing legal access to Parcel 7 shall be
constructed and open to the public prior to the issuance of
a Certificate of occupancy for the first residential unit
and also prior to allowing access to model homes.
4. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit and plat
recordation, all applicable regulatory permits shall be
obtained.
S. The maximum height for all structures in Parcel 7 shall be
36 feet.
6. A waiver shall be granted to allow the use of paver block
on privately owned and maintained streets.
7. The sidewalk construction timetable shall be added to the
plan prior to presentation to City Council.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Jones, and passed by unanimous 7/0
vote.
• Workshgys Petition SP- 96 -15, by Henry Skokowski, agent for
Sal l enlsl es Development C.'arpora ti on, is requesting site plan approval
for the construction of 23 single - family detached custom built units
on 9.25 acres on Parcel 25b in the Ballentsles Planned Community
District (PCD) . (13-42S-428)
Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated January
9, 1997, and noted that the applicant was requesting two waivers and
that the reference to Parcel 7 in staff recommendations 4 and 5 should
be corrected to Parcel 25b. Planning and Zoning Director Walton
explained that Seacoast Utilities had placed the developer on notice
years ago regarding the well location requirement and now that this
pod was being developed was requesting resolution prior to
construction of the site. During discussion of the CBS wall and
fence, Director Walton commented that the detailed buffer cross
sections on the original approval showed nothing going through the
buffer.
Henry Skokowski, agent for the petitioner, briefly described the
property and the project and requested a waiver for the use of paver
blocks. Mr. Skokowski referred to the Site Analysis chart on page 3
of the staff report and cited the code requirement for minimum setback
• 3
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 14, 1997
of a side facing street shown as 20 feet. A waiver allowing a 10 -foot
setback was requested due to the unique nature of the site, where
there was a 12 -foot separation between the lot property line and the
landscape buffer. Discussion ensued regarding setbacks for different
lots. Mr. Minor advised that setbacks were measured from the building
to the property line. Mr. Skokowski requested that a 3 -1/2 foot
setback waiver be granted in the event there were two two -story
buildings across the street. Chairman Sabatello questioned whether
a waiver for only a 3 -1/2 foot difference was necessary, to which Mr.
Skokowski responded that the petitioner believed the waiver was
applicable in the development of this project. Mr. Skokowski stated
that the petitioner was concerned regarding imposition of the
condition by Seacoast and did not feel 'it was the applicant's
obligation to provide; however, the applicant was agreeing to the
condition because it was recommended by the City Engineer. Chairman
Sabatello questioned whether the applicant objected to extending the
wall to the north, to which Mr. Skokowski responded that the applicant
would agree to what was decided by staff. Director Walton clarified
that there was no change from the original approval which stated that
the PCD buffer area would be maintained by BallenIsles just the same
as if there were a fence.
• vice Chair Carlin made a motion to recommend approval of Petition SP-
96-15 to the City Council with the following recommendations:
1. The Site Plan shall reflect the location of a well for Seacoast
Utilities Authority with the understanding that the said well
can be relocated to an alternative site mutually agreed upon
between the applicant and Seacoast Utility Authority. Any
alternative site (generally located between Holly Drive and
Merrill Canal, lying crest of Military Trail) must be determined
prior to submission of final construction plans and plat.
2. The section of the 6 foot high CBS wall located in the PCD
buffer at the northeast corner of the site shall be replaced
with a chain link fence. This conforms with the current approval
for this segment of the PCD buffer.
3. The maximum height for all structures in Parcel 25b shall be 36
feet.
4. The final surface water management system, that is necessary to
serve Parcel 7, shall be constructed with Parcel 25b in
accordance with the Conceptual SFMID Permit. This entire system
0 4
•
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 14, 1997
shall be completed including a legal positive outfall prior to
issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy.
S. The roadway providing legal access to Parcel 25b shall be
constructed and open to the public prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the first residential unit and also
prior to allowing access to model homes.
6. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit and plat
recordation, all applicable regulatory permits shall be
obtained.
7. A waiver shall be granted to allow use of paver block on
privately owned and maintained streets.
8. A waiver shall be granted for side corner setbacks as follows:
Lots 14 and 15 - 10 feet; Lots 6 through 23 - 7 -1/2 feet; and a
minimum pavement setback of 74 -1/2 feet.
Mr. Mignogna seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 7/0 vote.
Workshoo: Petition SP- 96 -16, by 8enneth A. Blair, agent for LRP
Publications, Sac., requesting site plan approval for the construction
of 123,379 square feet of office and 45,100 square -feet of warehouse
facility on 9.97 + 1- acres on Lot 5 and a portion of Lot 6 of PGA
National Commerce Park within PGA National Planned Community District
(PCD) . (15-42S-42B)
Mr. Mignogna stepped down due to a conflict as he was the Structural
Engineer for this project.
Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated January
9, 1997. It was noted that both of the buffers would need to be
approved prior to this petition approval and that those two petitions
had been submitted and were going through the process. In response
to a question of regarding the high -end residential rental units were
located, Mr. Minor indicated the area on a map. The adjacent property
and roads were also indicated.
Kenneth A. Blair, agent for the petitioner, commented on open issues,
including parking and stated that the petitioner would meet parking
requirements. The waiver for three loading spaces was requested to
• ,5
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 14, 1997
accommodate Federal Express, UPS; and Postal Service trucks. Mr.
Blair indicated that the applicant would comply with the requirement
that no drainage retention be within the landscape areas or within
medians.
Mr. Blair introduced Jim Martini with LRP Publications. Chairman
Sabatello welcomed Mr. Martini to Palm Beach Gardens and thanked him
for choosing the City as their southern headquarters.
Mr. Pastore questioned whether LRP would occupy all the phases so that
the loading zone waiver would apply to the entire proposed site plan,
to which the response was affirmative, although phases 4 and 5 did
show loading bays so that the waiver would apply primarily to Phases
I & II. Mr. Pastore requested a landscape plan which would apply to
everything while Phase I was being constructed. Mr. Blair expressed
that there would be no problem providing a Phase I landscape plan,
however, expressed concern that since Phase II was planned to quickly
follow Phase I he would hate to see a lot of landscaping required
along the entire western border which would have to be moved. Mr.
Blair suggested that in lieu of that landscaping that a bond could be
required that the landscaping be installed within a specified time
period. Chairman Sabatello suggested that a mechanism be worked out
with staff in the case that Phase II did not go forward by a certain
date, landscaping would be identified which would be installed by a
specified date; and also the how the undeveloped areas not included
in Phase I would be maintained. Mr. Pastore commented that his
concern had been triggered by the possibility that the land clearing
work might not stay within the Phase I boundaries. Chairman Sabatello
advised the petitioner that a landscape plan was needed for Phase I.
One member of the Committee expressed the opinion that massive
buildings would require larger landscape materials. Access to Phases
III and IV was indicated on the plan. Chairman Sabatello requested
that the applicant provide color samples for the buildings, window
frames, accent colors, canopies, etc. Mr. Glidden commented that roof
mounted equipment would need to be screened from line of sight,
defined that if the equipment was six feet above the roof then the
screen wall would need to be six feet above the roof. Curbing,
parapet wall, and the need for a location map were discussed.
Clarification of the canopy height and material shown on the west
elevation was requested. Expansion of the noting system was requested
on the warehouse elevations. if scuppers were to be used they should
also be shown on the elevations. More information regarding material
to be used for different items was requested, such as the truck well;
and possibly more dimensions to be added to the site plan, unless
0 6
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 14, 1997
staff was comfortable with the current plan. A better network of
sidewalks to get people out of the driveways earlier was recommended,
by Mr. Glidden, especially in the southwest and northeast corners, to
prevent people having to walk long distances through the parking lot.
Another area noted just to the south of the Phase IV warehouse was a
sidewalk which stopped at a handicap space, which could be continued.
Mr. Glidden also requested that the sidewalks on this site match up
with sidewalks on adjacent sites. Chairman Sabatello requested that
lines on the site plan be clarified as to their meaning. Chairman
Sabatello questioned whether the applicant would have a problem with
a condition stating that if the loading area waiver caused traffic
circulation problems that a loading are then be required. Mr. Blair
expressed no problem with such a condition.
Jim Martini explained that LRP Publications was a publishing company
which produced legal and business newsletters, books, and bound
business and professional documents. The Phase I and II buildings
would house the marketing staff, human resources, editorial staff,
some data entry production staff so that they would primarily be used
for office -type functions. Distribution in those phases would be
through telephone line transmittals to their northern facility.
Chairman Sabatello requested that the lighting for Phase I and outside
Phase I be shown on the lighting plan,. Chairman Sabatel-lo questioned
whether the applicant understood the turnpike buffer issue and that
this petition could not go forward until that was resolved. Mr. Blair
indicated that he would converse with staff on that matter.
Mr. Glidden requested that a floor plan be provided to clarify the use
of the Phase III loading area.
V, Vbt • 61,,,, e
Wor shoos Petition CU- 96 -06, by Joseph J. verdone, agent for Mecca
Farms, Inc., is requesting a conditional use approval to amend table
Z and table 2 of Resolution 125, 1995, which approved a conditional
use for the existing and proposed agricultural uses. (36 -41S -428)
Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated January
9, 1997. Planning and Zoning Director Walton added that truck storage
desired for more than one truck would need to be approved.
Joe Verdone, agent for Mecca Farms, Inc., indicated that the applicant
7
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 14, 1997
agreed with most of the staff comments, and provided a brief
background history. Mr. Verdone indicated that Mecca Farms had had
to vacate their Donald Ross Road location much sooner than anticipated
due to the Abacoa project development, and had relocated their fruit
and vegetable stand. Mr. Verdone explained that previously Mecca
Farms had operated under County regulations, and that some of the City
requirements were different, such as requiring tiedowns- -with which
the applicant had no problem. Mr. Verdone commented that the
applicant would update the existing site plan to show railroad ties
or fencing per staff preference, to keep vehicles from the pine tree
area. The plan would also be amended to reflect minimum code
requirements to comply with perimeter landscaping along Hood Road, and
to show the planting area around the sign. Mr. Verdone stated that
the applicant desired to be a good neighbor.
Mr. Verdone stated that the applicant did not agree with removal of
existing vegetation at this point since this site was a farm which was
constantly being plowed, and after its eight -year interim use the City
would have a chance to review and require removal at that point. Mr.
Verdone addressed traffic concerns, agreed to provide a 25 -foot wide
paved area over the existing NPBWCD canal and to provide a 30 -foot
• turnout radius as requested by the City Engineer, which would be
reflected on the plans. Mr. Verdone requested a waiver for mulch
parking within the fruit and vegetable area, which would be used for
two 6 -week periods during the growing cycle, andstated agreement to
a condition regarding that length of time. Planning and Zoning
Director Walton questioned County requirements concerning produce
coming from,off -site. Mr. Verdone agreed to bring a letter from the
County to clarify their requirements. Truck storage was discussed,
which would need to be approved. The applicant agreed to comply with
City regulations regarding public facilities, which would be provided
by Porta Pottie or a similar concern. Mr. Verdone indicated that the
applicant would work with staff regarding parking and paving, and
noted that this was an interim use rather than a final use. Mr.
Verdone explained that a security trailer for the property was planned
where security personnel would be on duty 24 hours per day, and that
the applicant was primarily before the Commission to request amendment
to the tables in Resolution 125, 1995. Chairman Sabatello indicated
that the Commission would require more information regarding County
regulations for security trailers. Mr. Verdone indicated that hours
of operation for picking vegetables and the stand would be sunup to
sundown, which would be noted when addressing this matter. Discussion
of the present operation ensued. Mr. Verdone indicated that a well
and septic system would be provided for the security trailer if
• a
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 14, 1997
someone was in residence 24 hours a day. The possibility of deleting
the security trailer from the application was discussed. Mr. Verdone
indicated that no problems had been experienced with people using the
property at night for other purposes, except for kids walking through
the fields. Mr. Pastore questioned whether the wooden sign stayed up
year round, to which Mr. Verdone responded the applicant would agree
to take the sign down after the growing season had ended. Discussion
ensued how regulation of incoming off -site fruit and vegetables could
be accomplished. Mr. Verdone agreed to work with staff regarding that
matter.
Workshgp : Petition P&W - 9 6 - D 7, by Henry Skokowski, agent for Amstar
Texas Pool, Ltd., is requesting a Planned Unit Development approval
for the expansion and renovation of the Holiday InnImacArthur's
Vineyard hotel complex. The Hol i day Inn is located at the northwest
corner of the PGA Boulevard /Zbterertoto 95 interchange. (1- 425 -429)
Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated January
8, 1997.
• Henry Skokowski, agent for the petitioner, explained that this project
centered around the need to rezone the property to a PUD because of
the PGA Boulevard Overlay District. Mr. Skokowski commented that
Amstar had purchased the property last year and desired to upgrade the
building, landscaping, and signage so that the remodeling could be in
place by October, 1997. The PGA Overlay requirements might require
rezoning the entire area up to I -95, however, that would not change
any other aspects of the planned renovations. Mr. Skokowski explained
that if the City had a concern regarding the east access driveway that
the applicant was willing to reconfigure the site, if necessary, and
operate with only the western access. Mr. Skokowski expressed the
hope that this petition might be presented at an advertised public
hearing in approximately 30 days. Mr. Skokowski indicated that some
signs would be eliminated and others scaled down, although hotel
siqnaqe was very important. Mr. Skokowski introduced those present
at the meeting who were associated with this project.
Lynn McBroom, Amstar Group. Ltd. representative, expressed pleasure
with the City's managed growth and commented that the number one
priority for the group was to accomplish the renovation in a timely
manner and that they were very willing to work with staff to work out
issues. Tim Fish, Architect with Cooper Cary Architects, displayed
a photo of the existing hotel and a depiction of the proposed exterior
• 9
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 14, 1997
elevation. Proposed landscaping improvements and building renovations
were described. Mr. Skokowski explained that if the original approval
required that all of the land be included in the requested rezoning
that none of the project improvements would be affected; however, the
legal description would have to be changed and it would be noted that
any future development of the north lot would be a part of the PUD
process. Mr. Skokowski discussed possible waivers in regard to (1)
whether a buffer would need to be added at this time on the northern
property, (2) a few places which did not meet the requirement that
there be a tree within 40 feet of any parking space, and (3) places
where there was insufficient room'to plant a tree.
Mr. Fish indicated that problem areas of the building had been
identified from code standpoints, ADA, waterproofing, and other
conditions. Mr. Fish explained that the present port cochere was too
low to accommodate fire - fighting equipment; the color was undesirable,
and there were problems with how the water flowed off the existing
precast beams. The .new proposal included recoating the entire
building with an exterior insulation and finish system, creating new
cornices, cutting off existing precast beams to clean up fascias,
constructing a new 141611 high port cochere, upgrading existing
. balconies, adding mullions to dress up window areas, adding an arcade
to tie the building areas together, uplighting balconies from the
ground with white lighting, replacing all existing globe lights with
updated fixtures, and adding a decorative roof - mounted spire. Colors
samples were submitted. All window and door frames were to be bronze
except certain setback areas which had silver colored anodized
aluminum frames; all quest rooms and public areas were to be updated;
doors would be replaced where needed; landscaping would be added
around the base of the building consisting of Sabal, Coconut, and Date
palms; and smaller rooftop units would be installed and placed near
the center of the roof to reduce the sight line. The applicant was
advised that rooftop units must be screened and the elevations must
reflect the screening of the units. It was suggested that placing the
screenwall right around the equipment would be suitable. The
applicant indicated that Phase I and the interior would be done at the
same time. Chairman Sabatello expressed concern with pedestrian
circulation on the site. The applicant described proposed
reconfiguration of the.pedestrian circulation. Discussion of the
traffic circulation problems ensued. Eric Sise, General Manager of
the hotel, explained that a big part of the parking problem was
identifying the use of Building B and C entrances to hotel guests so
that they would use those entrances instead of going through the
lobby. Another issue was having a bellman at the front to make sure
• 10
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 14, 1997
parking in the front lot was not abused during happy hour, which would
be addressed during the renovation by reduction of the lounge
facility. The applicant was requested to address possible
identification for entrances other than the front entrance. Mr.
Pastore commented that the existing balcony steel was faded from full
exposure to the sun. Mr. Jones commented that the building spire must
be distinguishable as a building feature rather than appearing to be
an antenna.
Mr. Skokowski displayed and reviewed existing and proposed signage,
and explained that variances had been approved in the past for some
of the signs. The five signs now on the street would be replaced with
only two, and a waiver would be requested from the required 50 -ft.
setback from I -95. Another sign would be proposed in an island.
There was extensive discussion in regard to the signage. Mr.
Skokowski commented that he would request that the applicant to think
about the heights of those signs. Entrance and directional signs were
described, as well as other wall signs. Mr Skokowski requested three
signs versus the four now at the top of the building. Another sign
was proposed for hotel identification on the port cochere. Planning
and Zoning Director Walton suggested that staff look at the sign code
• and advise the applicant. Chairman Sabatello advised the applicant
to be as close as possible to the sign code and to have good reasons
for any variations. Mr. Skokowski explained that the applicant would
address reducing the number of waivers, and would like to return for
an advertised public hearing in 30 days.
Chairman Sabatello requested review of the PGA entrance to make it an
easier entry to negotiate. Kayhart Pinder agreed that the entry would
be reviewed. Mr. Walton commented that the Military Trail entrance
did not lend itself to driving directly to the front entrance of the
hotel. Chairman Sabatello suggested that both entrances were week and
should be addressed.
K=kshou: Petition CU- 96 -o8, by Slattery and Root Architects, agent
for Temple Beth David, for the expansion and renovation of the
existing Temple Beth. David site. This petition would amend existing
Conditional Use in an RL -1 residential low density district. Temple
Beth David is located at 4657 Hood Road between Military Trail and
Central Boulevard. (36- 41S-42S)
Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated January
8, 1997.
• 11
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 14, 1997
Principal Planner Marty Minor reviewed the staff report dated January
8, 1997.
Mr. Glidden commented that a roof plan was needed. Mr. Glidden
questioned why a port cochere must be 131 -6" so that emergency
vehicles could get under it and requested further information.
Douglas Root of Slattery and Root Architects, representative for the
petitioner, presented elevations and reviewed the elements of the
project. A roof plan was requested. Any rooftop equipment was
requested to be screened. The applicant was advised to note all
finishes and colors, and to bring color samples to the next
presentation. The scale of the freestanding menorah logo was
requested. Parking was briefly discussed. The applicant was advised
that enough paved spaces would be needed to handle worst -case daily
use, and that a numerical analysis to justify requested parking would
be needed.
Chairman Sabatello advised that the applicant needed to address
colors, details in the site plan, and grass parking; and that staff
would probably make additional requests at the next meeting.
OLD BUSINESS
There was no old business to come before the Commission.
There was no new business to come before the Commission.
• 12
•
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 14, 1997
ADJOIIRNI�NT
There being no further business, upon motion by Mr. Glidden, seconded
by Mr. Miqnoqna, and unapaUkously carried, the meeting was adjourned
at 11:20 P.M. The next ee inq will be held January 28, 1997.
APPROVED:
anatel.io, cnairman
Tli inn T7i nc 01-1 = 4 r
0l 1 Ar7c»
TAT l l i am Mi rr »nrrn7
ThnmaO �tnrc
Damn i »i
f''hri �tnnhcr .Tnnpc
)
Jeff Ornstein, Alternate
(Absent)
John Nedvins, Alternate
.T. _, -- i o 'ar-O l n-I Ccnro} -zrer
13
OUNTY, MUNICIPAL AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS
I.A1:' NAME —FIRST NAME— MIDI)IE NAME NAVF 110ARLk COUNCIL. COMMISSION. AUTHORITY. OR COMMITTE:
04
%SA.%AW% Co.
%iAILIN4 ADDRESS THE I50ARLX COUNCIL. COMMISSION. AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE ON
S�Q Ci���ii4 � ' WHI ' 1 SERVE IS A UNIT OF:
G, I couNTY OTHER I OC'At AGENCY
t'Ot IN r%
�A1L 111. 11 ITIC'AL YUBDIVISION:
Tt'CtorJ p -�<. -1 G.
UAJ E ON WHIC'II VOI t lX'c'URRI-D
MY 1'U511'InN 15:
ELECTIVE APPOINTIv
WHO MUST FILE FORM 85
This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board
council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presentee
with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; althougi
the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law.
Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly dependink
on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please. pay close attention to the instructions on this four
before completing the reverse side and filing the form.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES
ELECTED OFFICERS:
person holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inure
o his special private gain. Each local ufficer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the specia
gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained.
In either case, you should disclose the conflict:
PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure or
which you are abstaining from voting; and
WITHIN IS DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording
the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
APPOINTED OFFICERS:
A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure whicr
inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the
special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained.
A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate: in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but mus
disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whethe'
made by the officer or at his direction.
lF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICi-
THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN:
• You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible fo
recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes.
.� copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency.
• The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest
1 f III%1 ry III•MA PA.
a w I.t • _
IF %U MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING:
• You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating.
• You should complete the form and rile it within IS days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minute-
of the meeting. who should incorporate the form in the minutes.
��\ M DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST
1. �+1��►t� s` `��'+ __ , hereby disclose that on k' \094';' .19-44
�
(a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one)
`/ inured to my special private gain; or
inured to the special gain of
(b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows:
, by whom I am retained
5: \ P'm <we SI-Mocm umpe. SVIA4 Peer- ",Tko ?T&V�,VTW-7 0
Cr on
Date Filed Signature
NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES $112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRE
+DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING
IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT. DEMOTION. REDUCTION I.,
SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5.000.
a FORM is • 10.86 Pr