HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes Council 012695CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL REGULAR MEETING
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
January 26, 1995
The Special Regular Meeting of the City Council of the
City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, was called to
order by Mayor Clark at 7:30 P.M. in the Assembly
Room of the Municipal Complex, 10500 North Military
Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and opened with
the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL The City Clerk called the roll and present were Mayor
Clark, Vice Mayor Monroe, Councilman Russo, and
Councilwoman Furtado. Councilman Jablin arrived at
7:40 P.M.
ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Clark stated that the announcements were as
posted on the City's Bulletin Boards.
ITEMS BY MAYOR AND CITY
COUNCIL•
COUNCILMAN RUSSO Councilman Russo verified that in regard to future
economic development, the City Council agreed with
next week's presentation at the Economic Development
group meeting to explore tax abatements for sizeable
economic developments.
ORDINANCES:
ORDINANCE 1, 1995 Ordinance 1, 1995, Rezoning 734 Acres of Land to
Planned Community District, permitting a use to
consist of 365 dwelling units and a 21 -hole golf
course, was presented for consideration of first
reading. Planning and Zoning Director Rich Walton
provided background for this project. Councilman
Russo made a motion to place Ordinance 1, 1995 on
first reading. Motion was seconded by Councilwoman
Furtado. It was the consensus of the City Council
that voting to place this Ordinance on first reading
in no way meant to indicate which way each
Councilperson would vote in the future. Motion passed
4 -0. The City Clerk read, on first reading, Ordinance
1, 1995.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
ORDINANCE 1, 1995 Mayor Clark declared the Public Hearing open, which
was duly advertised 1/11/95 and held on the intent of
Ordinance 1, 1995, the same being Rezoning 734 Acres
of Land to Planned Community District, permitting a
use to consist of 365 dwelling units and a 21 -hole
golf course. Planning and Zoning Director Walton
requested that a letter from the Department of
Airports dated January 26, 1995 be included in the
record since their representative was unable to attend
this meeting. City Attorney Baird announced that
Counsel for Gardens Country Club had requested the
opportunity to cross examine any witnesses where
appropriate in accordance with the Snyder decision,
and, therefore, the City Attorney was placing the
public on notice that by presenting information at
this public hearing they might be subjecting
themselves to cross examination by an attorney, that
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL REGULAR MEETING, 1/26/95 PAGE 3
the City Council as the quasijudicial body would
determine appropriateness, and that if this was
troublesome the only recourse was to the Florida
Supreme Court to instruct otherwise. Councilman Russo
stated for disclosure purposes under the Snyder
decision that he had had no conversations with anyone
regarding the subject of this public hearing during
the past two years, but may have had one discussion
with Mr. Cordani prior to two years ago. Gary
Brandenburg, agent for the petitioner, provided
document packages to the City Council members and
requested that the information be included as a part
of the record. Mr. Brandenberg summarized the
background of this project up to the present point and
provided the information that 279 acres of the 734
acres in this project would be set aside for wetland
preserves; stated that a wildlife corridor meeting
County specifications had been provided; and expressed
his belief that this was an excellent project
environmentally. Mr. Brandenberg explained that
traffic, water, and sewer were not issues; however,
public safety had caused controversy. Items already
agreed to by the petitioner were that the guardhouse
would contain a lighted alarm board to alert any
rescue vehicles to the exact location and type of
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL REGULAR MEETING, 1/26/95 PAGE 4
emergency; security guards who manned the guardhouse
would be cross - trained in EMS procedures; a 2,000 -sq.
ft. fire - rescue EMS substation would be provided by
the petitioner at a satisfactory location which would
meet response times in the city's Comprehensive Plan;
a $60,000 cash donation would be made to the City for
the purchase of equipment for the Police and the Fire
Rescue Departments; 15 acres would be set aside for a
park; and an agreement had been reached with Counsel
for Pratt Whitney which would satisfy their concerns.
George Gentile of George Gentile Associates,
environmental consultant for the project, reviewed
the environmental aspects. Howard Ostrout, of Howard
Ostrout & Associates, who had provided the planning
and zoning input for this project, explained that the
the planning process had included the least impact to
the wetlands, gave reasons for the golf course and the
clubhouse locations, and explained the wildlife
crossings.
Beth Cocanougher Ms. Cocanougher explained that she would not comment
since agreement had been reached with the petitioner.
Mr. Brandenburg submitted a copy of their agreement
for the record.
Ken Jackson Ken Jackson, Holly Drive, expressed concern that if
the project was not built out that the proposed tax
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL REGULAR MEETING, 1/26/95 PAGE 5
base would not develop and that language placed into
sales contracts would not prevent the noise - related
problems in the future.
Elaine Atchison
Elaine Atchison expressed concern of possible impact
to Florida's wetlands system.
Kathleen Brennan
Kathleen Brennan stated she was speaking as a
representative of Palm Beach County's Department of
Environmental Resources Management. Ms. Brennan
discussed the State greenways project, expressed
concern that the project might impede the movement of
wildlife and recommended that all environmentally
related permits be obtained before land clearing was
approved. Ms. Brennan also recommended that the Game
and Fresh Water Fish Commission and Florida Department
of Environmental Protection be contacted to be
involved in maintenance of the project, and requested
that the City Council consider the ecological
functions of the entire area. During ensuing
discussion, Vice Mayor Monroe requested that a meeting
of all concerned agencies be set up.
Rosa Duran
Rosa Duran, representing the Audubon Society of the
Everglades, discussed the need for mitigation banking
and expressed concern that this project would
negatively impact wetlands and a wildlife corridor.
Kathryn Dwor
Kathryn Dwor, 13105 Silver Fox Trail, represented the
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL REGULAR MEETING, 1/26/95 PAGE 6
Caloosa Property Owners Association which she stated
had taken no particular position in regard to this
development, however, were concerned that this
development could be a prelude to annexation, and
stated for the record that Caloosa did not desire City
security services since they had a contract with Palm
Beach County for those services. Ms. Dwor welcomed
the new project as a neighbor, but questioned
enforcement of the vested rights agreement.
JoAnn Davis JoAnn Davis, as a representative of the Palm Beach
County Chapter of the Florida Native Plant Society,
expressed concern over endangered plants on the
project site, questioned the wildlife study, and
explained littoral planting in response to
Councilwoman Furtado. Attorney Brandenburg offered to
provide Ms. Davis with a copy of the study regarding
plants on the site.
There being no further comments from the public Mayor
Clark declared the Public Hearing closed.
Councilwoman Furtado requested staff research costs
over and above the $60,000 donated by the petitioner
for hiring fire - rescue and police personnel; the
approximate cost to develop the park area; as well as
any other costs which might be incurred by the City,
to be presented at the next meeting on this project.
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL REGULAR MEETING, 1/26/95 PAGE 7
Councilwoman Furtado stated that the meeting to be
held with the environmental agencies might alleviate
her concern over the wildlife corridor. Vice Mayor
Monroe listed important issues that she would consider
in future discussions as (1) the vested rights
agreement which must be consistent with the judicial
decision that stated that the 1980 plan would govern
and that the Board of County Commissioners and staff
of Palm Beach County must promptly act upon any review
and not unreasonably withhold approval of the
petition; and (2) that the 1980 Comprehensive Plan
required that urban services be provided efficiently
and economically, and that plan was geared to phasing
of urban services to support densities and to
eliminate premature development and checkerboarding.
Vice Mayor Monroe expressed concern that $40,000 of
the $60,000 donation by the petitioner was earmarked
to equip an existing fire truck which was now used by
the current city residents. Vice Mayor Monroe
questioned how the County could determine that they
could provide services efficiently when they would not
be providing those services, and disagreed with
approval of a project based on an automatic aid
agreement. Vice Mayor Monroe requested information
from staff as to how inspections of fire sprinklers
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL REGULAR MEETING, 1/26195 PAGE 8
would be conducted for private homes, and size
requirements for the proposed fire /police facility.
Councilman Russo expressed concern that the stated
future tax revenue was not realistic, cautioned that
the City Council must adhere to all applicable laws,
remarked that he planned to meet with the City
Attorney to determine the proper legal position,
suggested that security services might be more
efficiently serviced through cooperation with the
County, requested further coordination of the
environmental issues, and stated his biggest concern
was with the numbers for this project. Councilman
Jablin asserted his agreement with the points raised
by the other City Council members, and also requested
and received information from the petitioner regarding
phasing and agreements with Seacoast Utility Company.
Mayor Clark thanked everyone who had worked on the
project. Vice Mayor Monroe clarified for the
petitioner that the five year limitation in the vested
agreement had been added only because she believed no
one should have longer than five years. In response
to Councilwoman Furtado, Attorney Brandenburg
explained he believed that all conditions required by
staff were acceptable.
ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, motion was
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL REGULAR MEETING, 1 /26/95 PAGE 9
made by Vice Mayor Monroe, seconded by Councilman
Jablin, and unanimously approved to adjourn the
meeting at 9:40 P.M.
APPROVAL ayl
MAYOR DAVID CLARK
VICE MAYOR LIN ONROE
COUNGX/��
OSEPH RUSSO
COUNCILMAN ERIC/ JAB
lv
W
COUNCILWOMAN LAUREN FURTADO
ATTEST:
LIN A V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK
_ george g. gentile & associates, inc.
landscape architects /planners /environmental consultants
June 8, 1994
City of Palm Beach Gardens
10500 N. Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
Attention: Kim Glas, AICP, City Planner
Re: Gardens Country Club PCD No. 94 -01
Response to Environmental Questions
Dear Ms. Glas:
This letter serves as our response to those issues relating to the environmental aspects
of your letter dated June 3, 1994 for the above referenced PCD.
1. The environmental assessments prepared by Cout(er /Hearing has been updated
to reflect statistical data for the current master plan as well as the more specific
quantities for wetlands and uplands that have been field verified and surveyed
(attached revised text).
2. Attached, please find map of jurisdictional determination which includes those
wetlands under jurisdiction by the Army Corp of Engineers. The original aerials
are located in the Vero Beach, Florida, office of the Army Corp of Engineers.
It is the intention of the developer to meet the buffer and transitional areas and
widths adjacent to all wetlands. Current requirements of South Florida Water
Management District ( SFWMD) is a minimum of 15' wide buffers with an average
of 25'. This requirement will be modified by the new "environmental resource
permitting procedure rule." This rule should be adopted by the Department of,
Environmental Protection (DEP) and SFWMD prior to Gardens Country Club
seeking permits from these agencies. The current text of this rule eliminates the
specific buffer dimensions stated above and allows both the agencies and the
development team to establish buffer areas prior to issuance of permits, both for
surface water management plans and wetland alterations /preservation.
4. This project is currently being processed for PCD approval and will again be
resubmitted for PUD ordinance approval at a later date. At time of PUD
application "edge" treatments shall be shown in detail indicating elevation change
due to fill, transition areas, etc.
1001 north u.s. highway one • suite 205 • Jupiter • florida 33477 • (407) 575 -9557
corporate authorization no. is 177
tax (407) 575 -5260
- _ george g. gentile & associates, inc.
landscape architects /planners /environmental consultants
May 31, 1994
Environmental Management and Engineering
8259 North Military Trail, Suite 8
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
Attention: James F. Schnelle, Jr. P.E.
Re: Gardens Country Club Response to Letter
Dated May 19, 1994
Dear Mr. Schnelle:
Pursuant to your letter dated May 19, 1994 to Ms. Kim Glass, we offer the following
responses.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
Exhibit "G" as submitted by our office does not indicate specific acreage of
uplands or wetland. However, the intent of all documentation is to comply
with acreage of these two vegetative associations per the submitted master
plan. This would also be true with the vegetative analysis existing
conditions. The submitted full size drawings of wetland "grasses" is based
upon the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) determination
of jurisdictional wetlands. Grasses were determined by the consulting team
only.
WETLANDS
The SFWMD jurisdictional line is shown on the wetland plan. We only have
one copy of the aerial of jurisdictional by SFWMD. The Army Corp has the
only copy of the Corp wetland jurisdiction. The SFWMD line is the more
aggressive area.
PRESERVE AREA REQUIREMENTS
In our attempt to minimize wetland impacts, more of the development was
moved into the upland vegetation area. We feel it better to minimize the
buffer areatof wetland "J" than to increase our impacts to wetland. In
regards to all the wetland buffer areas, we are maintaining a minimum of
15' buffer with an average of 25' throughout the project.
1001 north u.s. highway one • suite 205 • jupiter • florida 33477 • (407) 575 -9557
corporate authorization no. Ec 177
fax (407) 575 -5260
_ george g. gentile & associates, inc.
_ landscape architects /planners /environmental consultants
. April 29, 1994
City of Palm Beach Gardens
10500 North Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 -4628
Attention: James F. Schneile, Jr., P.E.
Re: Gardens Country Club Petition PCD 94 -01 Environmental Review
Dear Mr. Schnelle:
Pursuant to our meeting on Monday, April 26, 1994 at the City Hall and in response to
your letter dated April 15, 1994 to Kim Glas, we are providing this letter of response and
additional information. We understand this information is requested to assist you further
in review of this petition. Our response to the 21 items requested are as follows:
E
1. We have provided for your review a transparent overlay of the master plan,
wetland determination areas and wetland overlay with condition grading for your
review.
Colonial bird nesting and roosting areas are located throughout the major wetland
areas of the site. These bird species have utilized the more protected larger
wetlands concentrated in the central portion of the project site. Specific locations
of continually used roosting areas are few, due to the use of this site in the past
and the degradation of most of these wetland habitats by alterations to the historic
drainage patterns. These alterations include the development of the C -18 canal,
the perimeter canal along Royal Palm Beach Colony, and the improvements to
State Road 710 and the SCi. railroad (see attached Exhibit D and E).
3. Please referto the environmental assessment by Coutler /Hearing, attached Exhibit
F and Exhibit G. Please note that Exhibit G is a conceptual program for mitigation
and monitoring of significant wetland habitats or vegetation that may be disturbed
and will become more specific as this project goes through permitting with the
regulatory agencies.
4. For an analysis of the functional viability and quality of'the various habitats on site,
please refer to the wetland condition grading plan. The wetlands have been
ranked as to their functional value. As previously reported to the City, most of the
peripheral wetlands are of poor quality and recent years of drought, adjacent land
alternations and mis -use of the property has resulted in a deterioration of most of
the wetland communities on site. (See Exhibit H, Vegetation Analysis.)
1001 north u.s. highway one • suite 205 + jupiter • florida 33477 • (407) 575 -9557 AIM
corporate authorization no. Ic 177
fax (407) 575 -5260
City of Palm Beach Gardens
April 29, 1994
Page Three
13/14 The development team will use best management practices when construction of
the golf course comes in contact with the major ecosystems on site. These
practices will include berming, strategically place drainage swales and vegetative
buffers to prevent access by man or domestic animals into these systems. The
use of homeowner restrictions within the association documents will also assist in
protection of these habitats.
15. In our preliminary engineering studies for this project, we anticipate that many of
the lakes proposed on site will have similar control elevations to most of the
wetland water elevations on site. This should reduce impacts to wetland hydro -
periods throughout the site. Other methods such as lake lining will be used if
necessary to ensure minimum impacts.
16. See Exhibit A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H.
17. See Exhibit G. Appropriate and agency accepted relocation of listed species to
preserved habitats on site will be used to mitigate impacts and preserve these
resources.
18. We have no evidence at this time that commensal or synergistic species are on
site. However, the use of relocation techniques, wildlife culverts (crossings) and
the preservation of both upland and wetland systems will allow safe movement
throughout the site of these species.
19. See discussion item 15 above.
20. See attached Exhibit I.
21. See Exhibit G.
We hope this information will assist you in your review. If we can provide you further
information, please contact our office.
George G. Gentile, ASLA
President
GGG:mak
attachments
cc: Gary Brandyburg
Bill Cordani
Howard Ostrout
+Jy
george g. gentile & associates, inc.
landscape architects /planners /environmental consultants
— March 4, 1994
Howard Ostrout, Jr. & Associates
1851 W. Indiantown Road
Jupiter, Florida 33458
Attention: Howard Ostrout
Re: Environmental Statement for Gardens Country Club
Dear Mr. Ostrout:
The following is a summary of the environmental review issues for the Gardens County
Club project. As you are aware, the environmental assessments were submitted to the
City of Palm Beach Gardens, reviewed and a summary report was issued by James F.
Schnelle, Jr. on December 11, 1992. This letter shall serve as an update to those reports
currently on file with the City of Palm Beach Gardens.
WETLAND JURISDICTION /IMPACT
During the months of September through December of 1993, our office
conducted an evaluation of the existing wetlands located within the 734
acre site End requested a non - binding jurisdictional determination of the
wetland from South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the
Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (DEP). After both
agencies reviewed wetland flagging, the areas were surveyed and wetlands
claimed as jurisdictional be SFWMD /DEP totaled 313.54 acres. This is
approximately three acres less than previously determined by aerial review.
The new master plan has respected the high quality wetlands and has been
designed to minimize impacts and intrude on the peripheral wetlands that
are of lesser quality. The total wetland acreage impacted by the current
plan is 33.96 acres. This is a reduction of approximately 12.04 acres from
the previous plan. It is anticipated that these impacted wetlands will be
mitigated on site pursuant to requirements and acceptable management
plan by SFWMD, DEP and the Army Corps of Engineers.
The master plan has included an average of 25' buffer around each
wetland. The project will also incorporate best management practices
where the proposed golf course is adjacent to wetlands. This management
plan will incorporate design elements to ensure minimum impact to the
wetland from surface water runoff and human contact.
1001 north u.s. highway one • suite 205 • Jupiter • florida 33477 • (407) 575 -9557
corporate authorization no. Ic 177
fax (407) 575 -5260
Q�N
Environmental Consultants, Inc.
218 S. U.S. Highway Qne • Suite 301D • Tequesta, FL 33469 • (407) 744 -7420
October 18, 1993
Mr. Scott McNabb
Environmental Analyst
South Florida Water Management District
3301 Gun Club Road
West Palm Beach, FL 33416 -4680
Re: FDEP Wetland Jurisdiction Determination - Gardens Country Club
Property
Dear Mr. McNabb:
Thank you for meeting with Caroline Hanes and me on site on 10/ 15/93. As
agreed, I made a copy of the map we accepted in the field as representing the
extent of FDEP jurisdiction. The more darkly shaded areas on the enclosed drawing
represent the wetlands on site that come tinder FDEP jurisdiction. Those wetlands
are labeled "DEP ". The lightly shaded wetlands are not FDEP jurisdictional.
Please review the enclosure and contact me immediately should it not represent
the agreed upon extent of FDEP wetland jurisdiction for the property. I sent
Caroline Hanes a copy for her review and approval.
Again, thanks for your assistance with wetland jurisdiction determination on this
property. Hopefully, you should get a copy of the surveyed SFWMD jurisdictional
wetlands soon. We look forward to receiving your jurisdiction confirmation
letter shortly thereafter.
0
O
4
bll
�•J i .1 ',��C
i w QN
p N w
CL k4
w
teui
m ,
K �
ZIE 7
• tia IV
R
� d
rn c °i`c
p
c o
E d o
0
c ° c
e=
�
o c o
a
w
l!W �W
i w QN
p N w
CL k4
w
teui
m ,
K �
ZIE 7
• tia IV
R
� d
rn c °i`c
p
c o
E d o
0
c ° c
e=
�
o c o
W W tl
l!W �W
A
O A
�6'no
`c aocp
" Eu °Oiz
Ev" E.2
nE
o E o v•�
o n
oavi-
oaw4 -.
C&N
Environmental Consultants, Inc.
218 S. U.S.'Highway One • Suite 301D • Tequesta, FL 33469 • (407) 744 -7420
October 18, 1993
Ms, Caroline Hanes
Environmental Specialist
Florida Dept. of Environmental Protection
1900 S. Congress Avenue, Suite A
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
Re: FDEP Wetland Jurisdiction Determination - Gardens Country Club
Property
Dear Ms. Hanes:
Thank you for meeting with Scott McNabb and me on site on 10/15/93. From a
copy of the map we agreed upon in the field, I have recorded on the enclosed
drawing those wetlands that come under FDEP jurisdiction. The more darkly
shaded areas represent jurisdictional wetlands, and they are labeled "DEP ". The
lightly shaded wetlands are not FDEP jurisdictional.
Please review the enclosure and contact me immediately should it not represent
the agreed upon extent of FDEP wetland jurisdiction for this property. I've sent
Scott McNabb a copy for his review and approval.
Again, thanks for your assistance with this wetland jurisdiction determination.
Sincerely,
C&N Environmental Consultants
;S David K Nickerson,,Jr.
Principal
Enclosure
cc: Scott McNabb
�Geo1'ge,G. Gentile j
.
93 -001,
Gardens Country Club
Species Inventory
Common Plant Species
Species
Common Name
Habitat
Aletris farinosa
Colic Root
1,3
Alternanthera philoxeroides
Alligator Weed
2,3,4
Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum
Blue Maidencane
1,3
Andropogan capillipes
Chalky Bluestem
1,3
Andropogan glomeratus
Broom Sedge
1,3
Andropogan sp.
Beard Grass
1,3
Annona glabra
Pond Apple
2,3
Ardisia escallonioides
Marlberry
1
Asclepias tuberosa
Milkweed
1,3
Asplenium sp.
Spleenwort
2
Aster spp.
Aster
2,34
Baccharis halimfolia
Baccharis
3
Bacopa caroliniana
Bacopa
3
Befaria racemosa
Tarflower
1
Bidens alba
Spanish Needle
1,4
Bidens mitis
Beggar Ticks
3,4
Bidens pilosa
Spanish Needle
1,3
Blechnum serrulatum
Swamp Fern
2,3
Calopogon barbatus
Grass Pink
1
Carex howei
Sedge
3
Cassia chamaecrista
Partridge Pea
1
Cassytha filiformis
Dodder
1
Casuarina equisetifolia
Australian fine
4
Cephalanthus occidentalis
Buttonbush
3
Chara spp.
Musk Grass
2,3
Chloris glauca
Fingergrass
3
Chrysobalanus icaco
Cocoplum
3
Cirsium vulgaris
Thistle
1,4
Coreopsis gladiata
Tickseed
1,4
Cladium jamaicensis
Sawgrass
2,3
Crinium americanum
Swamp Lily
3
Cyperus sp.
Sedge
3
Cyperus haspan
Sedge
2,3
Cyperus odoratus
Sedge
2,3,4
Dichromena colorata
White Tops
2,3
Dichromena latifolia
White Tops
2,3
Drosera brevifolia
Sundew
1,3
f�
Status
4
EXHIBIT A
Gardens Country Club
Species Inventory
Common Plant Species
Page Two
Eleocharis ccllulosa
Encyclia tampensis
Erigeron strigosus
Eriocaulon compressum
Eriocaulon ravenlii
Eupatorium capillifolium
Euthamis minor
Fimbristylis autumnalis
Fimbristylis spathacea
Flaveria linearis
Fuirena scirpoidea
Fuirena sqaurrosa
Hydrocotyle umbellata
Hypericum fasiculatum
Hypericum myrtifolium
Hypericum sp.
Hyptis sp.
Ipomea sagittata
Ilex cassine
Ilex glabra
Juncus effusus
Juncus spp.
Justica ovata
Lacnanthes caroliniana
Liatrus tenufolia
Lilium eatesbaei
Lithospermum caroliniana
Lobelia glandulosa
Ludwigia peruviana
Lycopodium japonicum
Lyonia ferriginea
Lyonia lucida
Melaleuea quinquinervia
Mikania scandens
Myrica cerifera
Myrsine guianensis
Osmunda regalis
Oxypolis filiformis
Panicum hemitomum
Panicum repens
Spike Rush
Butterfly Orchid
Daisy Fleabane
Hat Pin
Hat Pin
Dog Fennel
Flat- Topped Goldenrod
Slender Fimbristylis
Fringe Rush
Yellow Tops
Rush Fuirena
Umbrella Grass
Pennywort
St. John's Wort
St. John's Wort
St. John's Wort
Musky Mint
Morning Glory
Dahoon Holly
Gallberry
Soft Rush
Bog Rush
Water Willow
Redroot
Blazing Star
Pine Lily
Puccoon
Glades Lobelia
Primrose Willow
Climbing Fern
Rusty Lyonia
Fetterbush
Melaleuca
Climbing Hempvine
Wax Myrtle
Myrsine
Royal Fern
Water Dropwort
Maidencane
Torpedo Grass
3
2
1,4
3
3
3
1
1,4
3
3
3
2,3
1,3
1,3
1,3
1
1
1
1
2,3
2,3,4
2,3
1,2,3
1
1
1
1
2,3
2,3
1
1
2,3,4
1,2
1,2,3,4
1
2
1
2,3
3
4
NNW
Gardens Country Club
Species Inventory
Common Plant Species
Page Three
Panicum rigidulum
Red Top Panicum
3
Panicum virgatum
Switch Grass
3
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
Woodbine
1,2
Paspalum repens
Water Paspalum
3
Persea borbonia
Redbay
1
Phlebodium aureum
Golden Polypody
2
Phragmitics australis
Reed
3,4
Physalis angustifolia
Ground Cherry
1,4
Piloblephis rigida
Pennyroyal
1
Pinus elliottii
Slash Pine
1
Piriqueta caroliniana
Piriquetta
1,3
Plantago lanceolate
Plantain
4
Pluehea roses
Marsh Fleabane
3
Polygala baldunii
Bachelor Button
1 1
Polygala cruciata
Drumheads
1
Polygala cymosa
Milkwort
1,3
Polygala lutea
Bog Button
1,3
Polygala grandiflora
Polygala
1
Polygonum hydropiperoides
Smartweed
3
Pontederia lanceolata
Pickerelweed
3
Proserpinaca palustris
Mermaid Weed
3
Pterocaulon pycnostachyum
Black Root
1,4
Pteridium aquilinum
Bracken Fern
1
Ptilimnium capillaccom
Mock Bishop Weed
3
Rhexia lutea
Yellow Rhexia
1,4
Rhynchospora corniculata
Beak Rush
3
Rhynchospora divergens
Beak Rush
3
Rhynchospora microtarpa
Beak Rush
3
Rhynchospora tracyi
Beak Rush
3
Rudbeckia hirta
Black -Eyed Susan
1,4
Sabal palmetto
Saba] Palm
1
Sabatia angularis
Sabatia
1,3
Sabatia grandiflora
Sabatia
1,3
Sagittaria lancifolia
Arrowhead
3
Salix caroliniana
Willow
2,3,4
Schinus terebinthfolius
Brazilian Pepper
4
Schizachrium rhizomatum
South Florida Bluestem
1,3
Schizachrium stoloniferum
Creeping Bluestein
1
Scirpus americanus
Common Three - Square
3
Serena repens
Palmetto
1
4
Gardens Country Club
Species Inventory
Common Plant Species
Page Four
Setaria sp.
Foxtail
1
Sisyrinchium atlantium
Blue -Eyed Grass
3,4
Smilax bona -nox
Greenbrier
1,2
Smilax laurifolia
Bamboo Vine
1,2
Sorghastrum secundum
L.opside Indiangrass
3
Spartina baked
Cord Grass
3
Stillingia sylvatica
Queen's Delight
3
Sisyrinchium atlanticum
Blue -Eyed Grass
2,3
Taxodium distichum
Cypress
2
Thaloa genieulata
Fire Flag
3
Tillandsia fasiculata
Pine Bromeliad
1,2 3
Tillandsia usneoides
Spanish Moss
1,2
Tillandsia recurvata
Ball Moss
1,2
Toxicodendon radicans
Poison Ivy
1,2
Triadenum virginicum
Marsh St. John's Wort
3
Tribulus cystoides
Puncture Weed
4
Typha latifolia
Cattail
3
Urena lobata
Caesar Weed
1,4
Utricularia inflata
Big Bladderwort
3
Utricularia cornuta
Horned Bladderwort
3
Vaccinium myrsinites
Shiny Blueberry
1
Vitis rotundifolia
Grape
1
Woodwardia virginiea
Chain Fern
1,2
Xyris sp.
Yellow -Eyed Grass
2,3
Habitat: 1 - Upland (Pine Flatwoods)
2 - Wetland (Cypress Woods)
3 - Wetland (Swamps, Marshes and Wet Prairies)
4 - Disturbed Areas
Status: 1 - Endangered (Federal)
2 - Threatened (Federal)
3 - Endangered (State)
4 - Threatened (State)
5 - Special Concern (State)
Gardens Country Club
Species Inventory
Fish
EXHIBIT B
Due to lack of any permanent water on the site, fish species existing on the site are limited.
Species
Mosquitofish
Flagfish
Golden Top Minnow
Common Name
Gambusia affinis
Jordanella floridae
Fundulus chrysotus
EXHIBIT C
Gardens Country Club
Species Inventory
Amphibians, Reptiles and Mammals
Species Common Name Status
Amphibians
Acris grylcus Cricket Frog
Rana pipens Leopard Frog
Rana grylio Pig Frog
Reptiles
Kinosternon subrubum Striped Mud Turtle
Terrapene carolina bauri Box Turtle
Chrysemys floridana Florida Cooter
Anolis caroliniensis Green Anole
Cnedidophorus sexilineatus Six -Lined Racerunner
Coluber constrictor Racer
Agkistrodon piscivorus Cottonmouth
Crotalus adamanteus Eastern Diamondback
Alligator mississippiensis Alligator
2,4
Coluber constrictor Southern Black Racer
Lampropeltis getulus Florida Kingsnake
Thamnophis sirtalis Eastern Garter Snake
Mammals
Didelphis marsupialis Opossum
F
Dasypus novemcinctus Armadillo
Procyon lotor Raccoon
F
Lynx rufus Bobcat
F
Sus scrota Wild Hog
G
Odocoileus virginianus White - Tailed Deer
G
Sylvilagus palustris Marsh Rabbit
F
Status: 1 - Endangered (Federal)
2 - Threatened (Federal)
3 - Endangered (State)
4 - Threatened (State)
5 - Special Concern (State)
F - Furbearing Animal
G - Game Animal
Gardens Country Club
Species Inventory
Birds
Species
Ardea herodias
Butorides striatus
Egretta cacruiea
Egretta thula
Egretta tricolor
Nycticorax nyeticorax
Nyctanassa violacea
Eudocimus albus
Cathartes aura
Coragyps atratus
Buteo lineatus
Pandion halioetus
Aramus guarauna
Grus canadiensis
Charadrius vociferus
Totanus melanoneucus
Zenaidura macroura
Columbigallina passerina
Otus asio
Bubo viginianus
Chordeiles minor
Megaceryle alcyon
Centurus carolinus
Dendrocopus pubescens
Corvus assifragus
Thyrothorus ludovicianus
Mimus polyglottos
Dumetella caroliniensis
Toxostoma rufum
Polioptila caerulea
Vireo griseus
Mniotilta varia
Dendrocia discolor
Geothlypis trichas
Setophaga ruticilla
Agelaius phoeniceus
Cassidix Mexicanus
Quiscalus guiscula
I
Common Name
Great Blue Heron
Little Green Heron
Little Blue Heron
Snowy Egret
Louisiana Heron
Black- Crowned Night Heron
Yellow- Crowned Night Heron
White Ibis
Turkey Vulture
Black Vulture
Red - Shouldered Hawk
Osprey
Limpkin
Florida Sandhill Crane
Killdeer
Greater Yellowlegs
Mourning Dove
Common Ground Dove
Screech Owl
Great Horned Owl
Common Nighthawk
Belted Kingfisher
Red - Bellied Woodpecker
Downy Woodpecker
Fish Crow
Carolina Wren
Mockingbird
Gray Catbird
Brown Thrasher
Blue -Gray Gnatcatcher
White -Eyed Vireo
Black and White Warbler
Prairie Warbler
Common Yellowthroat
American Redstart
Red - Winged Blackbird
Boat - Tailed Grackle
Common Grackle
Status
EXHIBIT D
Gardens Country Club
Species Inventory
Birds
Page Two
Richmondena cardinalis Cardinal
Melospize georgiana Swamp Sparrow
Falco sparverius American Kestrel
Caprimulgus carolinensis Chuck -Wills -Widow
Colaptes auratus Northern Flicker
Cyanocitta cristata Blue Jay
Status: 1 - Endangered (Federal)
2 - Threatened (Federal)
3 - Endangered (State)
4 - Threatened (State)
5 - Special Concern (State)
EXHIBIT E
Gardens Country Club
Species Inventory
Listed Species with Potential to Exist
Species Common Name Habitat $tpw
Plants
Calopogon barbatus
Grass Pine
1
T
Lilium catesbaei
Pine Lily
1
T
Encyclia tampensis
Butterfly Orchid
2
T
Tillandsia fasiculata
Pine Bromeliad
1,2
T
Phlebodium aureum
Golden Polypody
1,2
T
Amphibians and Reptiles
Alligator mississippiensis
American Alligator
2,�
SSC
Drymarchon corais
Eastern Indigo Snake
1
T
Birds
Egretta caerulea
Little Blue Heron
2,3
SSC
Egretta thula
Snowy Egret
2,3
SSC
Egretta tricolor
Tricolored Heron
2,3
SSC
Grus canadensis
Florida Sandhill Crane
3
SSC
Mycteria americana
Woodstork
2
E
Rostrhamus sociabilis
Snail Kite
3
E
Habitat: 1 - Upland (Pine Flatwoods)
2 - Wetland (Cypress Woods)
3 - Wetland (Swamps, Marshes and Wet Prairies)
4 - Disturbed Areas
Status: E - Endangered
SSC - Species of Special Concern
T - Threatened
EXHIBIT F
Gardens Country Club
I Palm Beach County
Environmental Assessment
ft'. (
April 10, 1992
Prepared & Submitted By:
Cotleur Hearing
A
1
Project: Gardens�`�o,lntt Club
Location: Pahn Beach County
TowiishiP:41S Range:41E Section:28, 29, 32, & 33
AERIAL MAP
y' szM•, ! ern
kt
:/,'4t�1'..4 ° •tyl ��t7{), ry .9'r S7' ``y
`�''�,�.'�a'���ji�)`•����ry� • .. � � °i { ",A ` ��ti5 � �:;f�1�•'p"� �ii5�.�'Pi' � •.ate
�' �'�a;:x•r,;`�`F'`"� • ak;��:r'�'•'^ � �ia.hli! k � � � xa t,pk �:al��?k
° .:. .:}}:Z'f•'- ;,'�.�'i,i�..�..�1L.�.yyi iils' t j,t /�'; ` 1'`Iiif; P ' •�s „ !„� W�tl rr,
' A.4S: sY:{ • 4...1i �''i,�t. %{ �.y�y q'y„ f..4�i1U4' . r 1 1,I i . v 1•r : •,_� L l%
- "'4Hr' �' ?!.�' "tL"!!j• a" �wYYC"ja �iT t ,� .'".,. w ' +r r � 1'l ' � °�.
�At't'�r ri+l "�4r ,�3 i I�,tlt�+to',� t•!'.•,����,�' ph�'1N,� '� u : r yF�r�^R7' '
`+�_'��•i',R 14t'�"'���•.�w•t:F i��l:;: "��h-.','k'A.Mt`i��' �,,l.�'��•,.' �•2J A�:! '� 1S4ra„' w; +,c "k•Yq C'S�i'• �'4
ri•i':.1'k 'T7f('•:'(o'.T.i 4• `!' ��'....fhi�'aw�diA j-• w'� " •. ^. * I, t,•y u g
no
1 3�° d� ,�+: r : • I ;. - n,.T di e.��lw"IM. Ti! f't'°�'' r.•,r�'�:Q 1�„'. t Ya Cr r' "'' J j+�r1\ ri" °
� cSS•)n::ly; Y �`rr.^ , •� r,r .�yypti r7. .Vd• ^• v( n t 'r'ei' , ir'k • M1 fi 7�„ r
' •�. ° .. '�.�.� i � t "':�.'+'r�"n,� .i..�_: �.J.77�[ B� i:S.' -��i•� i. • 3 ;'F" •�. �.'�'44�' {�s4•!t �`�
n..t �"* i5 ^,. � °;'7ta:3th''tt�'a,'n.']'�"Cr.� A •,!''�;nt ,, �i.i�',,� \ °•�
ro.. 4Y.,• +b, T• . I -. C..,v -:rte An tnr,4 -raq ,Y u•r y' :i17 I, 't ,�` r �(K+> 1` r, /��..a�• ry
rq "Ni 1 '7'r, v t if F Y cY a rV^hVG :� r1
tlx f+�.i�'tt: r : "•, Ir�i +t•I r ''�'I,�•,�.;t"" f F'= sir ":Jo'�+ •. •. -
ic ^1GI�'!a 7i.� I ,lµu'Tf�i'.Ir:• . � `i�.,?i1rS,lW}fgty�?p�.yry���3' 4.I. I�'4 I s ,
i! "Y11" • _-yri'�i �' ,K u' !?(_ *'" °!i, .14 - ; ( W, Y'ri l-wi-
y'r 'r' %! ,`t`( i� • � "i� :V 14ot . "0
fve`"r, W.
tr,�•s+�:srAr,r!'r,'�>?� ,.�. �,,,�� Eo",ia'm"I
a))��. 1 ,iv ;• y , ��,y� P r. •r� res'16"x :.�'i -r }1��1N Y., �C ".l /,}�.y,�''�Jt ;�i.txti,-A..', 7:; .'� "•�T (� �
:lY,y Yr r - � - ' !1' •.\ .1 .A .kai.� H, �. iyry J+y'� 1 ., Jp' ��1+:_,}r' a 'l,1� V�:11 !S w
'771 fit "LL.' ''' f•. " ``' M1. �• "� 1-��.i /A'�. 1�a � :�y/QQQ�f �: •��.�i; "Y_� {.'r .may ytjgj {%j9 /•
r N•A j4 \'" • .� YA ,',f•„'. e� �!�5.� e`�T 4 \'�� 11RN�+���7j{A.r'�'fj �. a'{ /�I r � �•,r 'l` ,-
,?.: C"�-!. ..'il'. vP "v4,. yA.. 7A, 1•�.•(�� ;li�iri „�14„ 1•i������� �rra• '!�
n .,N (. S; ., Y 1 �{ ";'C� "'fr `, r , r t° .o+rr�• j °7r r C , "' +i.. F•R Adrir, � d.`,`,Y{•ti • r •t i IM I- ,
,tw,. �. rn - '.- ' ,V • � �'% °� �1Ityr°:s�'C �• "mac 1E Ff:r' ' •'. BMA X11`2 �'f �,s I ! t I
'�:i ��} ' , .�fi9 '� t'.`.i:y !. ".`` � �s. • t +7vt .k'.+rL e f% � l • r
S `.:r;:^' � rt2'��rr.r�dr +'` �" "�'�:.� .. • !�'ie�, t r' w,• � � r ., ^':;i tur,:?'t,' ''1l
' f'� as ,r� ,,((�C (( „t•7r
IG^,'Ad:4l: }T :.:.-;yr.a.�. .,r,.. es •'}.. •'k'�yPf `•d11rti'l�+ti•t Oil '`r'!'•" f C f !. au...
OAV.%*
j'l ° PO-t -,.n. ,=�tV `••: e� '�` '� ;Sw 'vsj tp� f� r v.�,, Y' i 4
`•' "�i t °�r °`�a. _ :• '" ka k�_ r A , ,l�r, Wit:.
L i1 �� k
1 f
Prepared By:
Cotleur Ylearmg
e
U.S.G.S. Quadrangle
Aerial Date: 1.984
Scale: 1'r= 24000'
r — 400•
:,4) 641 424 643 740
822 2 '�
62 7,
621
0
643 429 '
424_ -
61
4 621
643 621 424 411 /
i
43 v 641 /
621
4
621 � 510 _
621 — 616
616 r
643 /
13 621 ,
0 /
43 -� CALOOSA
411 ESTATES
641
\� 740
00
O
F
Vegetative Analysis
Existing Conditions
Cotleur
Hearing
�ry
--j
'a®d
� v
U)
v
V
\`. 42s
Vcgctativc Communikics Lcgcnd
Pine Fiatwaoda
7
420.46 411
TiY V a fare,led uea wI W • avwpy or.Wh plae.lbe
ac
lyplwl urrf,nY,ry � .a., palmclb.. �. Q,.ubmy
.,Ie n.ure Qra»ea.
Me Gleuea
16.20 ac 424
W ait ntyrue W►uow
11.11 2G 429
WcnanA ,vanh >ynem, (bal lure beaolpe domiluled alN
vax mynlc. Whir. antl eamle avp�,rcl1d .YCh brabaan
Pc99cr bec.u.e of hyane dl.eurlr.rwe.
510
Man -Made Drainago Dltth
-Thlr
Intend Slough
22.00 ac 616
telegory V lould N aralmltr...y+ nw a.aoclakA rlU,
alreama a 2P and wd)) ml-,t— doedlnt Awmg (he
Dmnbnl,d N and
M e apy pond p pm .
aloe pine H h ao undcfelory d blue m.Wa�ol.e.
CTpres■ Swamp
40/n . 75 ac 621
Doow,alW 11,ma. m bah I nd w a—W torauuoeu
rIN u.wef,�ory M faranx bkeal.um km, .ml reJ .oel.
Marsh
/� n,�
141.94 ac 641
WWI— —1.1 lubinl r- nillmlyd
penal..V,pelatlon Jomlrf le.l b7 ek«1.aA. and —hc. —h
aagNhu W aavv�aaa alrl p 545 ncod In dc,per ar,aa.
�`
Wet Prairiaa
77.64 ac 643
ScaaauW wct hcrbacavua .,mml, AorNnalcd by al. J.b-
wyrt, Ixa(wah, yelioe• -eyed Qf;if and rNle bn[IM xdte.
:u.gra....nd mynk puy dammak m tlePlea.bual pecaeu.
Non'vege toted Dlaturbtd
[/yy�� 740
3.90 aC
Iualnrlt -ca" ntaa P- 07 —I.WK of bxr fend
nand and l+cNnt m •r ;clarion duc Io draYVgt and
Icprau-0 damage 4oro oll•tp+d rehWe k
Communitatlon Fltltluta
822
Cal +1 +1, el (M arlalian,om.V um 19 .
643
641 / d
0
tiq
a
643
I
r
400'
� _ t
11 A 12 424 643 2 eac X40
641 t0.tar 36 .
b4 t.3ac 14.3.3c C 822 Q /
B i
62 1.2-c f
J.9ac B
B 16 B 621
9/1 B zsa 424 — B B 15 61 E
4 a. 38 621 3 /
1
2.2ac ,,f
643 1 62i 7 424 411 /
'
0.1a '
24 A
643 A `� 641
,sac 3 31
4.
62 31
1.6ac 4
B 621 /f 510
21 2 7.4aC
621 6 19
20 616 B
3 /
9 Sa 0
.A c 5.4ac 621 ,
643 6 5.18 c r
5.7aC
740 C
27 G 43 A � I CALOOSA
\% % 643 B 411 ESTATES
641,- c
C o
\
740 / eo
/ qRQ
Vegetative Analysis_
Existing Conditions
-1
oLleur
:Hearin,
.. 4i
. .:•.i,t •v S :•Wf
N
U)
® C�,C••Sss
�1
b
LJ 1 H. H L-1 a H H• w `F.
o
�tffir� (�[I(aytalj� ?�6Ft� €id €�M4lI ?t I {f9s? 7���i��l!¢;Er'j?!f6
�i'''1F• {�:i� {:l�i {���sS "�{ sioS. {i "s #:��� {j, { €j,tj {� I °�:�� "n
r1
�E
t t
i !
i+iSS/ eii
� �� ��t.r. I i ldj3fi l���,� 6{ ;� 1s.;� ,,r• ;I {r
~1 b
� a
c
Qq
O � a
a
O
a
v
CL , n .�
a n o
n
. v
a
0
� a
O
Gardens Country Club, ,
' i ,
nvironnTc- ital. Assessment^ Y j 5 c
A
Background Information'
On behalf of William Cordate, Sr. and Partners, Principals on a 734 acre parcel due south
of Caloosa Estates, Palm Beach County, Florida, Coticur Hearing Environmental
Consultants, Inc., prepared the following environmental assessment.
The parcel is located in Township 41S, Range 41E, Sections 28, 29, 32 and 33 southeast
of Caloosa Estates, approximately seven miles northwest of the Florida Turnpike on the
Beeline Highway. Bound by the C -18 canal to the southeast, to the northwest the site is
bordered by an undeveloped subdivision consisting of one acre lots. The Beeline Highway
borders the northeast side of the site and is the third side of this triangular site. Across
this road is Caloosa Estates, another low density single - family development.
Historic aerial photography flown in 1973 shows the site in it's relatively undisturbed state
impacted only by the Beeline Highway and the SCC Railroad on it's northern boundary and
the South Florida Water Management District's C -18 canal to the east. This is further
confirmed by NASA infrared photography of similar data.
Historical data reveals a slough wetland system in strand formation running through the
northwest corner of the site. This system was a part of a much larger drainage basin,
perhaps connecting historically to the Loxahatchee Slough. Otherisolated wetland systems,
generally prairie type formations, were also found to exist.
After 1979, significant development influences have occurred contiguous to the site, greatly
impacting the site and creating the signature we have today. Contiguous to the southwest
of the property boundary of the site, the land was dramatically altered by a subdivision
development consisting of several hundred one -acre lots, associated roads and drainage.
A drainage canal and berm are constructed along this boundary restricting the normal
hydrological surface water flow, thus changing the hydroperiod and isolating the site from
any connection to the system it was once a part of. This can be clearly seen by
examination of existing aerial photography and USGS Quadangle maps of the site and
surrounding area.
These existing outside influences, the Beeline Highway and Caloosa Estates to the north,
the C -18 canal to the west and a developed one -acre subdivision to the southwest have A
dramatically affected the property thus stimulating dynamic succession and degradation of
the wetland systems.
Existing Vegetation
Existing vegetation on this project site consists of pine flatwood and freshwater wetland
systems.
The dominant plant community is pine flatwood (411), comprising of 481.5 acres,
approximately 65% of the total area. Dominant tree species are Slash Pine (Pinus elliottii)
__ and scattered Dahoon Holly (Ilex cassine). Understory consists of Saw Palmetto (Serenoa
�. repens), Gallberry (Ilex glabra) and various native grasses such as Bluestem (Andropogan
sp.) and Wire Grass (Aristida sp.) at the upper elevations and Blue Maidencane
(Amphucarpum muhlenbergianum) at lower elevations. A table of all the vegetative
communities are included within this report.
Numerous motorcycle trails wind through the flatwood areas. They have not substantially
impacted the quality of the habitat, but probably do interrupt and divert surface water
flows disrupting hydric patterns.
The pine flatwood west of wetlands 9, 10 and 11 show signs of recent fire. While large
pine masses still exist, many mature pines were killed and the canopy is very open.
Understory consists of dense Saw Palmetto, Staggerbush and Gallberry.
The pine flatwood on this site are all considered to be of good quality. However, just to
the north of wetland 13 and also wetland 5, the two wetland areas severely impacted by
Melaleuca, the infestation has spread into the adjacent low flatwoods and the habitats are
degraded.
The slough wetland system that runs through the northwest corner of the site includes
three types of cypress swamp; cypress scrub, cypress strand and cypress dome. However,
all exhibit signs of degradation resulting from the above mentioned hydric disruptions and
many of the Cypress exhibit signs of heart rot, a typical effect of stress from reduced
hydroperiod.
Cypress scrub (616) exists on the shallow portions •of the slough and vegetation consists
of scattered, stunted Cypress (Taxodiuni distichum) with a monoculture understory of Blue
Maidencane. These areas exhibit high levels of successional change with Pines and Saw
Palmetto establishing within the historic wetland boundaries. To varying degrees,
Melaleuca has invaded much of this habitat. There are approximately 22.00 acres of this
cypress scrub habitat on -site.
Depressional areas with greater elevational variation support cypress strand and cypress
dome formations (621). Both habitats consist of a canopy of Cypress (Taxodium
distichum) with understory dominated by Saw Grass (Cladium jamaicense), St. Johns Wort
(Hypericum sp.), Blechnum Fem"(Blechnum serrulatum), White- Bracted Sedge (Dichromea
sp.), Wax Myrtle (Myrica cerifera), Redroot (Lachnanthes caroliniana) and Panicum sp.
There is approximately 40.75 acres of this habitat type on the site.
The reduced hyroperiod has resulted in areas of cypress strand being infiltrated by exotics
such as Melaleuca and Climbing Fern (Lygodium microphyllum). In some areas the
Melaleuca has established so densely that native vegetation is unable to compete and is
rapidly being displaced.
The areas of cypress dome, which typically occur in the deeper and hence wetter
( depressional pockets, have not as yet been extensively invaded with Melaleuca. These
�. domes do however contain Climbing Fern (Lygodium microphylium) and Brazilian Pepper
Vegetative l -.Alysis
-Legend
nHigh Quality _
I I The wetlands in this category are basically undisturbed. As with all wetlands on "
g r1' Y
this site, there is some damage from off -road vehicles but is very minor and limited
to the extreme fringes. Preliminary investigation of biotic diversity indicate that
these wetlands are healthy systems of high value that will quickly recover when
access from off -road vehicles is eliminated.
After careful evaluation, we have determined that only a few small isolated systems
and one approximate 15 -20 acre isolated wetland, in the center of the site, have not
been impacted by the canals and development influence surrounding the site.
j�
Somewhat Disturbed
Included in this category are wetlands that are degraded, but appear to be basically
intact and viable. Most have had their outer edges damaged by off -road velucles,
but the damage does not extend into the wetland enough to have disrupted their
overall integrity and structure. "These wetlands have been further stressed by
surrounding land use and drainage practices that have reduced overall water flow
into the site. Thus general lowering cf water levels is evidenced by the
encroachment of young Slash Pines and Saw Palmetto, and also by invasion of
Melaleuca. However, Melaleuca density is not to the extent that the system has
been totally impaired or disrupted.
[b] Severely Disturbed
Due to severe damage from off -road vehicles the wetlands in this category are
g � g rY
degraded to the point that they no longer provide function as wetlands. The
majority were wet prairies with small Myrtle swamps in the depressional centers,
These wet prairies are now virtually void of vegetation, containing only scattered
Specimens of former species composition. While many of the swamp pockets are
still intact, disruption to their contributing watersheds prevent their continuing
viability without substantial reconstruction costs that would far exceed the value of
these small pockets.
Also included in this category are areas that were once predominately Cypress, but
now because of lower water levels, have been densely invaded by Melaleuca.
Understory vegetation is quickly being eliminated and the health of the Cypress are
declining.
majority were wet prairies -with small Myrtle swamps in the depressional centers.
These wet prairies are now virtually void of vegetation, containing only scattered
specimens of former species composition. While many of the swamp pockets are
still intact, disruption to- their contributing watersheds prevent their continuing
viability without substantial reconstruction costs that would far exceed the value of
these small pockets.
Also included in this category are areas that were once predominately Cypress, but
now because of lower water levels, have been densely invaded by Melaleuca.
Understory vegetation is quickly being eliminated and the health of the Cypress are
declining.
Somewhat Disturbed
Included in this category are wetlands that are degraded, but appear to be basically
intact and viable. Most have had their outer edges damaged by off -road vehicles,
but the damage does not extend into the wetland enough to have disrupted their
overall integrity and structure. These wetlands have been further stressed by
surrounding land use and drainage practices that have reduced overall water flow
into the site. This general lowering of water levels is evidenced by the
encroachment of young Slash Pines and Saw Palmetto, and also by invasion of
Melaleuca. However, Melaleuca density is not to the extent that the system has
been totally impaired or disrupted.
High Quality
The wetlands in this category are basically undisturbed. As with all wetlands on
this site, there is sonie damage from off -road vehicles but is very minor and limited
to the extreme fringes. Preliminary investigation of biotic diversity indicate that
these wetlands are healthy systems of high value that will quickly recover when
access from off -road vehicles is eliminated. .
After careful evaluation, We have determined that only a few small isolated systems
and one approximate 15 -20 acre isolated wetland, in the center of the site, have not
been impacted by the canals and development influence surrounding the site.
During the past year, access from Beeline Highway past the site has shifted from along the
east property line to along the west property line and correlates with a similar shift of most
severe ATV impact. With the end of the drought and reduced traffic, several of the
previously degraded wetland have shown remarkable recovery of wetland vegetation.
However, the wetland in the northeast corner shows only slight re- growth and it is not felt
that damage to wetland vegetation has been too severe and soil structure has been
destroyed.
l
(Schinus terebinthefolius) and also exhibit other signs of successional change with Wax
_ Myrtle (Myrica cerifera), Myrsine (Myrsine guianensis) and Dahoon Holly (Ilex cassine)
claiming a more dominant role than found in natural healthy systems.
The Encyclia Orchid, a plant species listed as endangered, has been identified and several
colonies exist within the proposed protected Cypress head throughout the property. The
Encyclia Orchid can be found throughout many of the pristine cypress areas on the
property and mapping would not be appropriate. Many of the existing orchid colonies
appear to be dead, probably the result of recent freezing temperatures. It is intended that
all trees containing the Encyclia be preserved intact or relocated by tree spade to areas to
be preserved. All trees shall be carefully inspected for live orchids.
Also existing on this site are a number of isolated depressional wetlands. The majority are
of the seasonal wet prairie type formation where water levels seldom exceed six inches.
Dominate species include St. Johns Wort (Hypericum sp.), Beak -rush (Rhynchospora sp.),
Spikerush (Eleocharis cellulosa), Yellow -Eyed Grass (Xyris sp.), White- Bracte Sedge
(Dichromena sp.), Hat -Pins (Eriocaulon sp.) and Redroot (Lachnanthes caroliniana).
In those areas where water levels attain depths greater than six inches and soil composition
contains sufficient organics to support typical vegetation, marsh systems have evolved. The
predominate species consist of Saw Grass (Cladium jamaicense),i Spike Rush (Eleogharis
cellulosa), Sedges (Carex sp.), Duck Potato (Sagittaria sp.), Bleclirnum Fern (Blechnum
serrulatum), Chain Fern (Woodwardia virginica) *and Panicum sp.
These isolated wetland systems vary in quality and extent of degradation. All have
experienced varying degrees of damage from off -road ATVs and motorcycles, much of
which is irreparable and has rendered many of the wetland systems non - functional.
These reduced hydric conditions are causing successional changes as evidenced by the
invasion of Wax Myrtle (Myrica cerifera), Willow (Salix caroliniana), Cattails (Typha sp.),
Dahoon Holly (Ilex cassine) and Redbay (Persea borbonia) into the depressional hearts of
these systems.
All the existing wetlands show signs of hydric deprivation and disturbance. Conditions
within the periphery wetlands adjacent to the canals are further impacted by seven culverts
into the C -18 canal on the east and also by a number of blow -outs in the canal dikes
caused by lower water levels in the canal.
The existing wetland systems on this site have been delineated on a vegetative analysis
plan and rated for quality according to the following parameters:
Severely Disturbed
Due to severe damage from off -road vehicles, the wetlands in this category are
degraded to the point that they no longer provide function as wetlands. The
GARDENS COUNTRY CLUB
Table of Existing Vegetation.
Vegetation
Classification
Type
740
Non - Vegetated Disturbed
621
Cypress Swamp
429
Wax Myrtle Willow
424
Melaleuca
643
Wet Prairies
641
Marsh
616
Inland Slough
411
Pine Flatwood
Total
DZH#40:3d=cc6.dch
Acreage
3.40
40.75
11.11
16.20
77.64
141.94
22.00
Ax, Aj;
734.00
Over the past two years, Melaleuca infestation has expanded in area and become more
severe.
Toomranhv
The site is relatively flat and contains no major topographic features. Elevations range
approximately between elevations 22.5 and 19.1 with overall grades slightly sloping from
the north to south with surface flows also generally following this gradient. A map of the
existing topo as interpreted from the SFWMD C -18 basin maps is provided within this
report.
The site generally consists of two ridge systems that confine the central slough. Also
existing are a series of depressional wetlands scattered throughout. During periods of
extreme high water, the major wetlands were historically connected by overland flow
through the areas of cypress scrub and low pine flatwood. "
However, with excavation of the adjacent canals that have cut off surface water inflows,
water levels are no longer sufficient to sustain this intermittent connection and Melaleuca
are infiltrating the systems.
Prolonged hydroperiod and accumulated organics within the lower depressional areas are
sufficient to support cypress swamp habitat.
The ridge areas are vegetated with pine flatwood and generally occur above elevation 21
NGVD.
Soils
Existing soils are a mosaic of upland and wetland soils and have been delineated on an
attached plan. Delineation and classification presented is as per USDA SCS Soil Survey for
Palm Beach County (1978).
The isolated wet prairie and cypress systems occur on soil types Tequesta muck and Riviera
sand, depressional. The depressional pockets and cypress swamp systems occur on the
deeper organic muck and sand capable of supporting a more diverse habitat.
The scrub cypress and low pine flatwoods occur on shallow flat sands that experience a
reduced hydroperiod. The stunted condition of the cypress may reflect the existence of a
marl hardpan closer to the surface and is common for this type of system.
Soils of the ridges consist of Riviera sand, Wabasso sand and Oldsmar sand which all
typically have the water table between ten and forty inches of the surface. A soils
inventory is included within this report.
Wildlife Data
Plant and animal species were surveyed through a series of on -site visits by jeep and on
foot. The entire site was covered each day, but efforts were more concentrated in the high
quality marsh and cypress systems.
Species were identified by direct observation, songs or calls, scar, tracks or sign.
A single species on the threatened species list was directly observed on the site during the
surveys. This species was the American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) which was
sighted in the central marsh system. Most of the wetland systems on the site lack
permanent water and are not felt to provide optimal alligator habitat.
Also observed utilizing this large marsh were Florida Sandhill Crane, Snowy Egret (Egretta
thula), Little Green Heron (Butorides striatus), Great Egret (Casmerodius albus), Killdeer
(Charadrius vociferus), Red -Wing Blackbird (Agelaius phoeruceus) and two immature White
Ibis (Eudocimus albus). Florida Sandhill Crane (Gnus canadiensis) is a species listed as
threatened; Ibis and Snowy Egrets are listed as species of special concern. No nests were
identified and because observances were sporadic, it is not felt that these species are
nesting on site, but merely utilize the site for occasional foraging. If any nest should exist,
it likely would be in this marsh system which is not propdsed to be impacted by
development.
Louisiana Heron (Egretta tricolor), also listed as a species of special concern, was observed
flying over the site and this species may also make occasional use of the site.
Florida Sandhill Crane (Corus canadensis), Woodstock (Mycteria americana) and
Everglades Kite (Rostrhamus sociabilis plumbeus) are other species listed as threatened or
endangered that inhabit vegetative communities existing on this site. These species were
not observed on site but may make occasional use of the site. These species are known to
exist in the nearby Water Catchment Area and Corbett Wildlife Management Area and it
is possible that these species may visit the site to forage on a more or less chance basis.
Low levels of wildlife activity observed could be attributed to seasonal low water levels at
the time of survey. Most wetlands Iacked any standing water and utilization by wading
birds may increase during periods of inundation. However, this extreme seasonal
fluctuation of water levels make it improbable that any substantial level of nesting or long
term residence occurs on this site.
Disturbance from ATV vehicles may also.be a contributing factor limiting wildlife utilization
of the site.
The Red - Cockaded Woodpecker is a species listed as endangered Federally and listed as
threatened by the State that inhabits pine flatwood communities. It was not observed on
the site and existing pine flatwoods are not of a quality that make such an existence
probable. Red- Cockaded Woodpeckers typically prefer mature old- growth pine forests
which do not exist on this site.
Evidence of four species of furbearers were observed on the site. These species were "
Raccoon (Procyon lotor), Opossum (Didelphis virginiana), Marsh Rabbit (Sylvilagus
palustris) and Wild flog (Sus serofa). These species are all common to undeveloped areas
of the state.
Hog activity observed was minor and it is not felt that any resident population contains
more than a few individuals. Tracks were small in size and indicated that these are feral
pigs escaped from domesticity. With development, these animals will likely move into
adjacent undeveloped areas.
Some observation of Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) activity has been identified
in the spoil dike along the western property boundary. A species of special concern, no
evidence of Gopher Tortoise activity was identified within the site, probably because of
relationship of ground elevation to the water table. This is substantiated by location of the
burrows at elevations substantially higher than site grades. Understory vegetation on this
site is too dense to provide optimal conditions and this site is felt to offer only marginal
habitat value for Gopher Tortoise.
Wildlife management for 'site development will -be directed toward enhancing species
richness and improving habitat conditions. Upland diversity may be somewhat reduced and
existing cavity trees should be preserved where feasible. it may be desirous to install
nesting boxes for Woodducks and Screech Owls.
Hydroperiod adjustments which may prolong periods of inundation and creation of deep
water habitat will benefit and provide habitat for fish and aquatic species. Access to
standing water on a year -round basis will appeal to waterfowl and may encourage nesting.
Due to the fact that all wetland habitat impacted by development will be replaced and
improved and that site development will actually yield a net increase in wetland habitat,
no long term effect on wildlife is anticipated by site development.
Recommendations
The Gardens Country Club is one of northern Palm Beach County's first eco- developments.
The project consists of 367 single family dwelling units, 18 holes of championsl-dp golf and
amenities including: clubhouse, tennis, swimming and pedestrian recreational facilities.
The Site Plan has been designed utilizing design clustering principles to provide minimum
impact to the existing vegetation and environmentally sensitive lands throughout the
property. The Site Plan configuration provides for linkages and continuity of all the
wetland areas throughout the site. Linkages of these systems has been provided by
preserving contiguous areas of wetlands, uplands and openspace throughout the site. This
design will help insure the perpetual preservation of the wetland systems as well as the
enhancement of many of the existing wetland systems that have been highly stressed to the
lack of a normal hydroperiod. In total, including the golf course tract and proposed lakes
C and water bodies, 513 of the total 734 acres an unprecedented 70 percent of the site will
be either openspace or preservation area. Residential development areas have been
clustered in tight compact areds for 220 acres or 30 percent of the site which has been
determine most suitable for development.
in addition to 18 holes of golf, a 8.2 acre clubhouse and tennis court complex will be
provided centrally located in the site. Facilities to be provided include eight championship
tennis courts, a 12,000 square foot tennis clubhouse, a 10,000 square foot golf cart storage
and maintenance building and a 40,000 square foot clubhouse facility. The clubhouse will
be accessible from all areas of the site by pedestrian paths and walkways.
The Gardens Country Club Planned Community Development will benefit the future
occupants of the proposed community by providing traditional single family housing within
a rural setting. Residents will have the opportunity to enjoy the vast open space and the
450.1acres of pine flatwoods and wetlands as well as the wildlife that is associated with
these habitats.
Mitigation
Mitigation proposed for wetland impacts will consist of three forms of work efforts, exotic
species eradication, hydric restoration and enhancement and/or creation of wetland habitat.
Exotic Eradication,
One phase of the proposed mitigation efforts shall take the form of clean -up and
eradication of exotic weed species in the wetland preserve areas. Exotic species to be
removed include:
Lygopodium spp.
Climbing Fern
Schinus terbinthfolius
Brazilian Pepper
Ludwigia peruviana
Primrose Willow
Melaleuca quinquinervia
Melaleuca
To preserve and protect desirable native species and existing wetland systems, methods of
eradication will vary depending upon specific site conditions but will include the following
techniques:
Mechanical Removal
Tlus method will utilize a loader mounted rake to remove mature Melaleuca trees,
with their roots, for disposal in approved vegetative debris landfill. Mechanical
removal will only be utilized when acdess and surrounding vegetation will allow
removal with a minimum of disturbance to the existing native systems to be
preserved.
(' \ . Manual Removal
This method will utilize manual labor to hand pull seedlings and vines that will
allow complete removal-of above and below ground portions.
This method will typically be utilized for herbaceous vegetation removal.
Herbicide Treatment
This method will involve the scarification and application of herbicide to individual
Melaleuca and Brazilian Pepper trees. It will be used where complete removal is not
possible without risk of damage to adjacent native vegetation.
For Melaleuca eradication, crews will utilize machetes to cut into the basal cambium
layer. These wounds will be treated with the herbicide 'Velpar L' mixed with a
surfactant agent and applied with hand sprayers.
To maximize benefits from systemic herbicide treatment treated trees will be
temporarily left in place.
Brazilian Pepper treatment will involve the cutting of individual trees to ground
level and painting of stumps with the herbicide 'GarlonV. "
When dry conditions permit, areas exhibiting dense exotic vegetation may involve
treatment by broadcast spraying with herbicide. This method shall be utilized
where densities of noxious species preclude establishment of native species and
results in a virtual monoculture. General spraying will also likely be utilized for
spot treatment and control of regrowth observed during maintenance inspections.
Herbicide treatment will be conducted during seasons of active growth.
To reduce potential seed dispersal, removal of mature brazilian pepper shall only be
conducted during late spring or summer prior to berry production.
In areas exhibiting severe infestation, following initial clean -out there will be a period of
maintenance in which any regrowth or potential seed germination will be encouraged and
eradicated. Length of this period will depend on exact conditions encountered but can be
expected to be between three and six months.
During this time period, it'is felt that exotics can be successfully eradicated and restoration
planting can commence.
Also during this period, any potential regrowth of.native vegetation can be identified and
incorporated into final restoration development.
Restoration Plantings
Development is only intended to encroach into wetland areas which have been highly
damaged and stressed and for which wetland values are significantly lower than those
typically associated with these habitats. In such case where wetland area is determined to
be impacted and lost, functions and values of such will be mitigated by the creation of new
wetlands and enhancement of those existing that are under stress prior to the occurrence
of the proposed impact to existing habitats.
The proposed restoration plantings will establish upland and wetland species typical of
surrounding habitat type for the purposes of habitat enhancement, visual aesthetics, access
control, and to reduce opportunity for establishment of exotic and weed species.
Specific methods to be utilized for establishment of vegetation at these restoration sites will
include the following methods:
Treespade - Utilization of eighty to ninety inch treespades to relocate native trees
and shrubs from areas of proposed construction. Vegetation will be transplanted to
proposed buffer and mitigation areas as shown on plans. Due care will be utilized
to protect from damage native understory vegetation relocated with tree ball and
any exotic weed species shall be eradicated.
Trees to be relocated will be tagged with flagging tape by the Landscape Architect
prior to the start of relocation efforts. Selection shall be based on existence of
appropriate recipient sites, overall health of specimen, size at it relates to survival
rates, accessibility and extent of any exotic infestation. Relocated trees shall be
labeled with non - binding plastic tags recording exact date of relocation.
Canopy species to be relocated- include Taxodium distichum (Cypress), Myrica
cerifera (Wax Myrtle), Sabal palmetto ( Sabal Palm), Ilex Cassine (Dahoon Holly),
Persea borbonia (Redbay) and Pinus elliottii (SIash Pine).
Relocation during period of dormancy greatly improves chance of survival for all
vegetation but is most crucial for Cypress which can only be relocated with
reasonable chance of survival during dormancy. In consideration of this time factor,
relocation of cypress will only be accomplished during periods of winter dormancy.
Hand Transplanting - Relocation of herbaceous wetland vegetation to supplement
and be interplanted in disturbed areas receiving restoration treatment.
Appropriate native vegetation shall be hand relocated from future impact areas
within the project and established in areas as shown on restoration plans to be
developed.
• Nursery Plant Material
Plant Size and Quality: Provide sizes of plants as shown on schedule, conforming
to ANSI 260.1 "Standard for Nursery, Stock" for shape and quality and "Grades and
Standards for Nursery Plants, Volume t and 11, F.D.A. ". All plants to be Florida
Grade #1 or better.
Furnish balled and burlapped (B &B) trees, except container -grown plants may be
furnished if indicated in the plant list.
Special Project Warranty: Warranty all plant material for a period of one (1) year after
date of substantial completion, against defects including death and unsatisfactory growth,
except for defects resulting from abuse or damage by others, or unusual phenomena or
incidents which are beyond the contractor's control.
Fertilization: Fertilize trees, shrubs, groundcovers and palms with "Agriform" 20 -10 -5
Twenty One (21) gram tablets at the below specified rate.
B &B stock to have 7 tablets
7 Gallon container stock to have 5 tablets
5 Gallon container stock to have 1 tablets.
I and 3 Gallon container stock to have I tablet.
Position plant in the hole. Backfill halfway up the root ball. Place tablet(s) beside the root
ball about 1 inch from root tips. Do not place tablet(s) in bottom of the hole. Complete
backfill, tamp and water.
Hvdric Restoration
Surface water management system will be designed and control elevation established to
restore hydric levels consistent with soil and vegetative parameters of existing wetland
systems. A combination of overland flow and piping will be utilized to connect Iakes and
wetland systems thereby preserving historic wetland connections and reducing potential
disruption of hydric patterns.
Wetland Jurisdiction
Four regulatory agencies may exert wetland jurisdiction over portions of the site. These
agencies are U.S. Array Corps of Engineers (ACOE), South Florida Water Management
District (SFWMD), Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER) and Palm
Beach County Department of Resource Management (PBCDERM). The extent of each
agency's jurisdiction is determined by it's rules and regulations.
FDER exerts jurisdiction only over those wetlands connected to waters of the state.
Preliminary indications are that FDER will claim jurisdiction over 101.5 acres of wetlands
on this site.
ACOE, SFWMD and PBCDERM exert wetland jurisdiction over both wetlands connected to
waters of the state and isolated wetlands. ACOE will likely claim jurisdiction over all
229.1 acres of wetland on site. Several of the small isolated wetlands on site when
surveyed may turn out to be smaller than the 0.5 acre size thresholds contained in SFWMD
and PBCDERM regulations. These small isolated wetlands may therefore be exempt from
review by these agencies.
Agency and wetland jurisdiction have been delineated on the attached plan of vegetative
cover types. With the exception of the ACOE, these jurisdictional determinations are
preliminary. Formal jurisdiction has been requested from the SFWMD and PBCDERM and
is anticipated to be available within the next thirty days. Formal jurisdiction from the DER
will not be available until permit applications are submitted for construction.
KLS: cws
KLS# 7: gdnscc 1.lds
THE
GARDENS
COUNTRY
CLUB
w3
EXHIBIT G
Gardens Country Club
Monitoring Plan
Mitigation
Mitigation proposed for wetland impacts will consist of three forms of work efforts, exotic
species eradication, hydric restoration and enhancement and /or creation of wetland habitat.
Exotic Eradication
One phase of the proposed mitigation efforts shall take the form of clean -up and eradication
of exotic weed species in the preserve areas. Exotic species to be removed include:
Lygopodium spp. Climbing Fern
Sehinus terbinthfolius Brazilian Pepper
Ludwigia peruviana Primrose Willow
Melalcuca quinquincrvia Melalcuca
Proposed methodology for eradication has incorporated recommendations contained in the
Melaleuca Management Plan for South Florida prepared by the Melaleuca Task Force
(April 10, 1990).
To preserve and protect desirable native species and existing wetland systems, methods of
eradication will vary depending upon specific site conditions but will include the following
techniques:
Mechanical Removal
This method will utilize a loader mounted rake to remove mature Melaleuca trees,
with their roots, for disposal in approved vegetative debris landfill. Mechanical
removal will only be utilized when access and surrounding vegetation will allow
removal with a minimum of disturbance to the existing native systems to be
preserved.
Manual Removal
This method will utilize manual labor to hand pull seedlings and vines that will allow
complete removal of above and below ground portions.
This method will typically be utilized for herbaceous vegetation removaf.
herbicide Treatment
This method will involve the scarification and application of herbicide to individual
Melaleuca and Brazilian Pepper trees. It will be used where complete removal is not
possible without risk of damage to adjacent native vegetation.
o Frill Application
For Melaleuca eradication, crews will utilize machetes to cut into the basal
cambium layer. These wounds will be treated with the herbicide 'Velpar L'
mixed with a surfactant agent and applied with hand sprayers.
To maximize benefits from systemic herbicide treatment treated trees will be
temporarily left in place.
o Stump Application
Melaleuca too large to be manually removed, but under 3 inches in diameter,
will be cut above water levels and stumps treated with the herbicide 'Arsenal',
All vegetative debris and Melaleuca cuttings shall be hauled away and
properly disposed of. Marker dyes shall be added to all herbicide mixtures.
Where risk of damage to adjacent vegetation prevents complete removal,
eradication of Brazilian Pepper will involve the cutting of above ground
vegetation to the base and the painting of individual stumps with the herbicide
'Arsenal' or 'Garlon 4'.
When dry conditions permit, areas exhibiting dense exotic vegetation may involve
treatment by broadcast spraying with herbicide. This method shall be utilized where
densities of noxious species preclude establishment of native species and results in a
virtual monoculture. General spraying will also likely be utilized for spot treatment
and control of regrowth observed during maintenance inspections.
Herbicide treatment will be conducted during seasons of active growth.
To reduce potential seed dispersal, removal of mature brazilian pepper shall only be
conducted during late spring or summer prior to berry production.
In areas exhibiting severe infestation, following initial clean -out there will be a period of
maintenance in which any regrowth or potential seed germination will be encouraged and
eradicated. Length of this period will depend on exact conditions encountered but can be
expected to be between three and six months.
At the end of this period, dead trees shall be removed or cut to ground level and debris
disposed of properly. Where removal would cause disturbance of existing native species and
wetland systems, treated trees will be left standing and any growth monitored.
During this time period, it is felt that exotics can be successfully eradicated and restoration
planting can commence.
Also during this period, any potential regrowth of native vegetation can be identified and
incorporated into final restoration development.
Maintenance
Upon completion of initial clean -up, routine maintenance shall be initiated at a maximum
of 90 -day intervals for a period of one year and thereafter annually. During these routine
maintenance inspections all noxious plant species over three inches in height shall be
manually removed. Any re- growth from roots or stumps shall be herbicide treated. Where
possible, without excessive damage, maintenance debris shall be collected and properly
disposed of.
Monitoring
Monitoring of mitigation areas shall be conducted in accordance with the requiremepts of
jurisdictional agencies. The monitoring program shall be administered by gbs &h/Cotleur
Hearing and shall` utilize the following survey methodology for collection of data. A plan
showing the layout of the monitoring program shall be submitted within one month of
issuance of permit program is included in this report.
Baseline Vegetation Survey
Transects shall be established through the mitigation and lake areas at the interfaces
of vegetative communities. These stations shall remain consistent over the
monitoring period.
At the time of initial station establishment and subsequently during each monitoring
session, information shall be collected concerning species composition, density and
relative health of vegetation present at each station.
Photographic Documentation
Fixed points shall be established in each of the wetland mitigation areas and shall
provide a consistent location for repetition of photographs that will provide a
panoramic view and record of conditions and changes within the mitigation areas.
The location of the photo stations are identified on the monitoring plan.
Macroinvertebrate Sampling
Qualitative macroinvertcbrate sampling will be conducted in all wetland systems
located within the wetland monitoring study area. Sampling quadrat stations will be
established as interphase zones and maerophyte zones located along permanent
transects established within each monitored wetland.
Methodology (Macroinvertebrate)
Samples will be collected utilizing a D -frame dip net for a period of at least 20
minutes per station. Samples will be collected within each niche of each maerophyte
community. Where standing water is not present, substrate coring and leaf and/or
stem scraping will be conducted. Substrate areas will be calculated for each sample.
All samples will be field sorted using standard ecological field procedures to preserve
them for subsequent laboratory identification. All samples will be identified to the
lowest possible taxon and preserved for the 5 -year study period in 70% ethanol. A
photographic record of collected specimen, if feasible, will be compiled for inclusion
in the monitoring report.
Staff Gauge
To provide data regarding water elevations, a staff gauge shall be installed within
each lake and impacted and /or enhanced wetland and set to NGVD elevation. Water
levels shall be monitored and recorded on a monthly basis at each monitor
inspection. The proposed location of staff gauges are shown on the monitoringlplan.
Rain Gauge, Flow Gauge and Data Collection
A rain gauge will be installed within the study area- to provide empirical data for
analysis, monitoring and reporting. The Omni Easylogger 900 recording system by
Omnidata International will be housed in weather -proof shelter boxes within the
study area. A Sierra Misco Deluxe Tipping Bucket rain gauge (Model #ES -165) will
be used and interfaced with the Easylogger Recorder. The Easylogger system
provides for fast and accurate retrieval of binary data which can be easily transferred
onto a laptop or desktop computer and converted into a variety of graphic formats.
Information on these systems is provided within the appendix.
Evaluation
Monitoring shall be conducted semi - annually at the end of the wet season, October,
and end of the dry season, April. Semi- annual reports shall be prepared that will
document the success of wetland mitigation. These reports will contain the physical
data and will describe any changes in vegetative species composition or dominance,
wildlife utilization or other relevant conditions observed.
These reports shall evaluate success of the mitigation program and shall outline any
revisions or recommendations felt valuable to improve the success of this or other
similar projects.
The status of germination and regrowth in areas that receive topsoil scedbanking
shall be discussed and compared with data collected documenting composition of
donor vegetation prior to disturbance
These quarterly reports shall monitor survival rates and maintenance of planted
vegetation and shall include a description of any plantings made to maintain eighty
percent (80 %) survivorship.
Existing infestations of exotic species shall be controlled and shall no longer offer
potential as a seed source for re- establishment.
Monitoring reports shall be prepared to meet the requirements of jurisdictional
agencies on an annual basis for five years.
KLS #7:gdnsec.mon
Vegetative -P-ot lysis
EXHIBIT H
Legend
�
j
High Quality -.
FA I The wetlands in this category are basically undisturbed. As with all wetlands on
this site, there is some damage from off -road vehicles but is very minor and limited
to the extreme fringes. Preliminary investigation of biotic diversity indicate that
these wetlands are healthy systems of high value that will quickly recover when
access from off -road vehicles is eliminated.
After careful evaluation, we have determined that only a few small isolated systems
and one approximate 15 -20 acre isolated wetland, in the center of the site, have not
been impacted by the canals and development influence surrounding the site. -
FBI Somewhat Disturbed
Included in this category are wetlands that are degraded,
but appear to be basically
intact and viable. Most have had their outer edges damaged by off -road velcles,
but €hc damage does not extend into the wetland enough to have disrupted their
overall integrity and structure. These wetlands have been further stressed by
surrounding land use and drainage practices that have reduced overall water flow
into the site. This general lowering of water levels is evidenced by the
encroaclunent of young Slash Pines and Saw Palmetto, and also by invasion of
Melalcuca. However, Melaleuca density is not to the extent that the system has
been totally impaired or disrupted.
1-61 Severely Disturbed
Due to severe damage from off -road vehicles the wetlands in this category are
degraded to the point that they no longer provide function as wetlands., The
majority were wet prairies with small Myrtle swamps in the depressional centers.
These wet prairies are now virtually void of vegetation, containing only scattered
specimens of former species composition. While many of the swamp pockets are
still intact, disruption to their contributing watersheds prevent their continuing
viability without substantial reconstruction costs that would far exceed the value of
these small pockets.
Also included in this category are areas that were once predominately Cypress, but
now because of lower water levels, have been densely invaded by McIaleuca.
Understory vegetation is quickly being eliminated and the health of the Cypress are
declining.
majority were wet prairies with small Myrtle swamps in the depressional centers.
These wet prairies are now virtually void of vegetation, containing only scattered
specimens of former species composition. While many of the swamp pockets are
still intact, disruption to their contributing watersheds prevent their continuing
viability without substantial reconstruction costs that would far exceed the value of
these small pockets.
Also included in this category are areas that were once predominately Cypress, but
now because of lower water levels, have been densely invaded by Melaleuca.
Understory vegetation is quickly being eliminated and the health of the Cypress are
declining.
Somewhat Disturbed
Included in this category are wetlands that are degraded, but appear to be basically
intact and viable. Most have had their outer edges damaged by off -road vehicles,
but the damage does not extend into the wetland enough to have disrupted their
overall integrity and structure. These wetlands have been further stressed by
surrounding land use and drainage practices that have reduced overall water flow
into the site. Tlus general lowering of water levels is evidenced by the
encroachment of young Slash Pines and Saw palmetto, and also by invasion of
Melaleuca. However, Melaleuca density is not to the extent that the system has
been totally impaired or disrupted.
l-Iigh Quality
The wetlands in this category are basically undisturbed. As with all wetlands on
this site, there is some damage from off -road vehicles but is very minor and limited
to the extreme fringes. Preliminary investigation of biotic diversity indicate that
these wetlands are healthy systems of high value that will quickly recover when
access from off -road vehicles is eliminated. .
After careful evaluation, we have determined that only a few small isolated systems
and one approximate 15 -20 acre isolated wetland, in the center of the site, have not
been impacted by the canals and development influence surrounding the site.
During the past year, access from Beeline Highway past the site has shifted from along the
east property line to along the west property line and correlates with a similar shift of most
severe ATV impact. With the end of the drought and reduced traffic, several of the
previously degraded wetland have shown remarkable recovery of wetland vegetation.
However, the wetland in the northeast corner shows only slight re- growth and it is not felt
that damage to wetland vegetation has been too severe and soil structure has been
destroyed.
(Schinus terebinthefolius) and also exhibit other signs of successional change with Wax
Myrtle (Myrica cerifera), Myrsine ( Myrsine guianensis) and Dahoon Holly (flex cassine)
claiming a more dominant role than found in natural healthy systems.
The Encyclia Orchid, a plant species listed as endangered, has been identified and several
colonies exist within the proposed protected Cypress head throughout the property. The
Encyclia Orchid can be found throughout many of the pristine cypress areas on the
property and mapping would not be appropriate. Many of the existing orchid colonies
appear to be dead, probably the result of recent freezing temperatures. It is intended that
all trees containing the Encyclia be preserved intact or relocated by tree spade to areas to
be preserved. All trees shall be carefully inspected for live orchids.
Also existing on this site are a number of isolated depressional wetlands. The majority are
of the seasonal wet prairie type formation where water levels seldom exceed six inches.
Dominate species include St. Johns Wort (Hypericum sp.), Beak -rush (Rhynchospora sp.),
Spikerush (Eleocharis cellulosa), Yellow -Eyed Grass (Xyris sp.), White- Bracte Sedge
(Dichromena sp.), Hat -Pins (Eriocaulon sp.) and Redroot (Lachnanthes caroliniana).
In those areas where water levels attain depths greater than six inches and soil composition
contains sufficient organics to support typical vegetation, marsh systems have evolved. The
predominate species consist of Saw Grass (Cladium jamaicense)1 Spike Rush (Eleo�haris
cellulosa), Sedges (Carex sp.), Duck Potato (Sagittaria sp.), Blechnum Fern (Blechnuin
serrulatum), Chain Fern (Woodwardia virginica)'and Panicum sp.
These isolated wetland systems vary in quality and extent of degradation. All have
experienced varying degrees of damage from off-road ATVs and motorcycles, much of
which is irreparable and has rendered many of the wetland systems non - functional.
These reduced hydric conditions are causing successional changes as evidenced by the
invasion of Wax Myrtle (Myrica cerifera), Willow (Salix caroiiniana), Cattails (Typha sp.),
Dahoon Holly (Ilex cassine) and Redbay (Persea borbonia) into the depressional hearts of
these systems.
All the existing wetlands show signs of hydric deprivation and disturbance. Conditions
within the periphery wetlands adjacent to the canals are further impacted by seven culverts
into the C -18 canal on the east and also by a number of blow -outs in the canal dikes
caused by lower water levels in the canal.
The existing wetland systems on this site have been delineated on a vegetative analysis
plan and rated for quality according to the following parameters:
Severely Disturbed
Due to severe damage from off -road vehicles, the wetlands in this category are
degraded to the point that they no longer provide function as wetlands. The
EXHIBIT I
JURISDICTIONAL
AGENCY
CORREPONDENCE
South Florida Water Management District
i 4a, Y
3301 Gun Club Road • P.O. Box 24680 • West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680 • (407) 686.88M • FL WATS 1.800.432.2045
CON 24 -01
Regulation Department
October 22, 1993
Mr. George G. Gentile
George G, Gentile & Associates, Inc.
1001 N. U.S. 1, Suite 205
Jupiter, FL 33477
SUBJECT: Pre - Application Jurisdictional Site Inspection
Gardens Country Club, Palm Beach County
Dear Mr. Gentile:
The District offers the following in response to your request for a jurisdictional determination of the
subject property.
A site inspection were conducted by Scott McNabb, Staff Environmental Analyst, of the Natural
Resource Management Division on Friday, October 15, 1993. Also accompanying Mr. McNabb on
the site inspection was Ms. Caroline Hanes of the Department of Environmental Protection and Mr.
Dave Nickerson of C & N Environmental Consultants, Inc.
The aerial photographs and project boundaries (defined by the heavy blue dashed lines on the attached
aerial) defined the area that was inspected. Based on the information provided, a portion of the
project area is considered waters of the state as defined by Chapter 403 F.S., and sections 17 -301 and
17 -312 F.A.C. Jurisdictional waters of the state are indicated by red cross - hatching on the attached
Exhibits 1 through R. Dredging or filling activities in these areas will require a Wetland Resource
permit from this agency.
This correspondence is an informational preapplication jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
403.914(2), F.S. It does not bind the District, its agents or employees, nor does it convey any legal
rights, expressed or implied. Persons obtaining this informal preapplication jurisdictional
determination are not entitled to rely upon it for purposes of compliance with provision of law or
District rules. A binding jurisdictional determination may be obtained by petitioning the Plorida
Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) for a jurisdictional declaratory statement pursuant to
FAC Rule 17- 312.040 or by applying for a Wetland Resource permit.
Governing Board•
Valerie Boyd, Chairman William Hammond Eugene K. Penis Tiltord C. Creel, Executive Director
Frank Williamson, Jr., Vice Chairman Betsy Krant Nathaniel P Reed Thomas K, MacVicar, Deputy Executive Director
Annie Betancourt Allan Milledge Leah G. Schad
Mr. George G. Gentile
SUBJECT: Gardens Country Club
DATE: October 22, 1993
page 2 of 2
A file has been set up at the West Palm Beach office with pre - application materials. If you have any
further questions please contact Scott McNabb at (407) 687 -6937,
Sincerely,
)x
Robert G. Robbins
Supervising Professional
Natural Resource Management Division
RR/sbm - Attachment (Aerial Photographs)
c: DEP- Larry O'Donnell /with aerial
USACOE - Linda Farrell
Palm Beach County DERM. /with aerial
Mr. Dave Nickerson -C & N Environmental Consultants, Inc.
City of Palm Beach Gardens
C& V
Environmental Consultants, Inc.
218 S. U.S. Highway Oqe • SuIte 301D • Tequesta, FL 33469 • (407) 744 -7420
October 18, 1993
Mr. Scott McNabb
Environmental Analyst
South Florida Water Management District
3301 Gun Club Road
West Palm Beach, FL 33416 -4680
Re: FDEP Wetland Jurisdiction Determination -- Gardens Country Club
Property
Dear Mr. McNabb:
Thank you for meeting with Caroline Hanes and me on site on 10/ 15/93. As
agreed, I made a copy of the map we accepted in the field as representing the
extent of FDEP jurisdiction. The more darkly shaded areas on the enclosed drawing
represent the wetlands on site that come under FDEP jurisdiction. Those wetlands
are labeled "DEP ". The lightly shaded wetlands are not FDEP jurisdictional.
Please review the enclosure and contact me immediately should it not represent
the agreed upon extent of FDEP wetland jurisdiction for the property. I sent
Caroline Hanes a copy for her review and approval.
Again, thanks for your assistance with wetland jurisdiction determination on this
property. Hopefully, you should get a copy of the surveyed srWMD jurisdictional
wetlands soon. We look forward to receiving your jurisdiction confirmation
letter shortly thereafter.
Page two
S. McNabb
Oct. 18, 1993
Please contact Cheryl Carpenter, George Gentile, or me with any questions.
Enclosure
cc: Caroline Hanes
George G. Gentile
93 -001
Sincerely,
C &N Environmental Consultants
David K. Nickerson, Jr.
Principal
Environmental Consultants, Inc.
218 S. U.S. •Highway One • Suite 301D • Tequesta, PL 33469 • (407) 744 -7420 .
• October 1,8, 1993 ,
Ms. Caroline Hanes
Environmental Specialist
Florida Dept. of. Environmental Protection
1900 S. Congress Avenue, Suite A
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
Re: FDEP Wetland Jurisdiction Determination - Gardens Country, Club
Property
Dear Ms. Hanes:
Thank you for meeting with Scott McNabb and me on site on 10/15/93. From a
copy of the map we agreed upon in the field, I have recorded on the enclosed
drawing those wetlands that come under FDEP jurisdiction. The more darkly
shaded areas represent jurisdictional wetland's, and they are labeled "DEP ". The
lightly shaded wetlands are not FDEP jurisdictional.
Please review the enclosure and contact me immediately should it not represent
the agreed upon extent of FDEP wetland jurisdiction for this property. I've sent
Scott McNabb a copy for his review and approval.
Again, thanks for your assistance with this wetland jurisdiction determination
Sincerely,
C &N Environmental Consultants,
David K Nickerson; Jr.•
Principal ,
cc: Scott McNabb
:,;rVrV1 ye, G. Gentile
'93 -001
s
w aN
O 4
W
IL
LU�
u� oc
LLI
LU
xv
E
Y 4
NL
` O
0. GMs L se
Ljf
• � • � � p •j L Y•
• w W O y W O�
Q. DOO'-' 44VO�
w p
Eu� Cu = E 2
Lij
• 4 C; ` o C_ o
2 J R'ti
0
OQYI -'i �dvlQ� A �
d