Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z 082890CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AUGUST 28, 1990 MINUTES The Regular Meeting of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, was called to order by Chairman Jeffrey Ornstein, at 7:30 P.M. in the Assembly Room at the Municipal Complex, 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. The roll was called by the secretary, and present were: Jeffrey Ornstein, Chairman; Mike Rosen, Vice Chairman; James Leatherman, Alan Strassler, Joseph Hamzy, Members; Rebecca Serra and Carl Sabatello, Alternate Members. Jack White and Domenick Lioce were not in attendance. ITEMS BY PLANNING AND ZONING DIRECTOR 4 1- Planning and Zoning Director Rich Walton asked the Commission to contact him or the Planning and Zoning Department staff if they had any questions concerning an upcoming Commission meeting, the meeting agenda or any aspect of planning. He said the Commissioners should feel free to contact him or the staff for any planning- related information. Mr. Walton stated that there were several issues discussed- at the August 14, 1990 meeting concerning the Wynfield Planned Community Development which were not included in the Commission's recommendation to City Council. By reviewing his August 28, 1990 memorandum to the Commission, Mr. Walton asked the Commission whether the issues should be included as part of the Commission's recommendation. Chairman Ornstein said he believed the Commission intended for the issues to be included in its recommendation to City Council. �� 1 • • • Vice Chairman Mike Rosen moved to authorize Chairman Ornstein to write a letter to City Council stating: 1. The above - referenced petition would return to the Planning and Zoning Commission for full site plan and zoning review if the site plan is revised in any way at the City Council level or some other level. 2. The petitioner shall provide a comparison on how the project meets the City's new environmental ordinance. 3. The petitioner shall donate the 14.5 acre park site to the School Board of Palm Beach County. The park donation shall be credited only toward the project's school impact fee and not the recreation and open space impact. Mr. James Leatherman seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a 6 -0 vote, with one abstention. Ms. Rebecca Serra stated she abstained from voting citing conflict of interest. SITE PLAN AND APPEARANCE REVIEW SP -90 -02 - Recommendation to City Council re: Site Plan Review for a 3,625 square foot addition to the existing 10,381 square foot YMCA located on a 6.43 -acre tract north of RCA Blvd. and approximately 500 feet west of Campus Drive. (6- 42S -43E) Mr. Bristol S. Ellington, City Planner, reviewed the staff report for the above - referenced petition and its conditions for approval. Mike Simon, who is representing the YMCA, said the YMCA is receptive to any comments concerning the configuration of the site's parking lot. Mr. Simon added that the petitioner takes exception to Condition of Approval #1, which calls for the installation of a six -foot high hedge, with irrigation, along the west side of the site's tennis courts prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. He said along the west 2 1. side of the subject property there is a ditch, which is a Florida Power & Light easement. In the easement is dense vegetation which currently acts as an effective buffer between the tennis courts and the neighboring residential community. Mr. Simon said the YMCA would install the hedge if the current vegetation is ever removed. Mr. Carl Sabatello asked Mr. Walton if there is a way to "trigger" the installation of the irrigated hedge if the existing vegetation is damaged or removed. Mr. Walton responded that there was no "trigger" mechanism and there is also no way for the City to know when the County would cut down the vegetation. Mr. Simon offered to make the installment of the hedge contingent of the existing vegetation's removal as a condition of approval. Mr. Sabatello agreed that he would like to see the existing vegetation remain, but there is a problem of enforcement of planting the new hedge if the existing vegetation is damaged. Mr. Simon suggested that if the existing buffer is removed, then the City's Code Enforcement Officers could require a new hedge to be installed. Mr. Walton added that he would not like to be the neighbors next to the tennis courts, without a buffer, during a drawn -out code enforcement procedure. Ms. Serra asked whether the YMCA will drain into the drainage ditch, which runs along the western side of the property. Mr. Simon said the drainage runs off into the retention area and not the ditch. Chairman Ornstein questioned why the western entrance was at an angle. Harold Smith, the architect for the project, said the entrance is already existing. At the request of the Chairman Ornstein, Mr. Smith agreed to straighten the entrance. Mr. Alan Strassler asked why they had one -way exit and entrances. Mr. Smith said the entrances could be converted to two -way entrances and exits if the Commission prefers. • 3 1 Chairman Ornstein added that if the petitioner wishes to go with one -way entrances, then the petitioner will need to provide signage plans. Mr. Smith said they wish to have the one -way exit and entrance, but they do not have signage plans to present to the Commission. Mr. Joseph Hamzy suggested a compromise concerning the buffer for the west side of the property by placing a solid wall instead of a hedge. Motion Vice Chairman Mike Rosen moved to recommend approval to City Council of the above - referenced petition with the following conditions: 1. A six-foot high hedge, with irrigation, shall be installed along the west side of the tennis courts when, and if, the existing vegetation along the tennis courts is removed. • 2. The westerly entrance to the subject site off of RCA Boulevard be straightened. 3. The petitioner will return before the Planning and Zoning Commission for approval of proposed signage on the site. 4. The fire hydrant shall adhere to Chapter 93, Fire Protection and Prevention Code, of the City of Palm Beach Gardens' Code of Ordinances. 5. In order to improve the vehicular circulation in the parking lot, the center parking space shall be moved further west, eliminating the western drive aisle, in order to provide a center drive aisle at the westernmost entrance. Mr. Hamzy seconded the motion. The motion was approved unanimously by a vote of 7 -0. PLANNING AND ZONING • 4 PUBLIC HEARING: AX -90 -03 - Recommendation to City Council re: (MacArthur Foundation Properties Annexation) Annexation, under Palm Beach County Development Regulations, of 10,217± acres, located, in the general, north of PGA Blvd., northeast of Beeline Hwy., south of the proposed Donald Ross Rd. Extension, west of the Florida Turnpike & east of "Caloosa" Subdivision (Area 1); of 1,653+ acres, located, in general southwest of Beeline Hwy., north of Lake Park West Road (a /k /a Northlake Blvd.), south of the proposed North County General Aviation Facility (Area 2); 1.01± acres, located, in general, on the east side of Alternate A -1 -A, between PGA Blvd. and Burns Rd. (Area 3); 6.62+ acres, located, in general, north of Lake Park West Rd. (a /k /a Northlake Blvd.), south of the Earman River, between the C -17 Canal & Alternate A- 1 -A (Area 4); 28.31± acres, located, in general, 1,000 it. south of Lake Park West Rd. (a /k /a Northlake Blvd.), east of Interstate 95, immediately west of the C -17 Canal (Area 5). The request includes the following sections in Township 41 South and Range 41 East: 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 35, and 36. Sections in Township 41 South, Range 42 East: 19, 20, 21, 28, 29, 30, 31 and 32. Sections in Township 42 South, Range 42 East: 5 and 6. Sections in Township 42 South, Range 41 East: 1, 2, 11, 12 and 13. Sections in Township 42 South, Range 43 East: 7, 18 and 19. (Adv. 7/30/90 and Readv. 8/13/90) Ms. Kim Glas, City Planner, reviewed the staff report on the above - referenced petition. Chairman Ornstein asked whether the City will be in a lawsuit with the Town of Jupiter because of conflicting claims to the subject area for future annexation. • Mr. Walton stated that there are other overlaps with future annexation areas such as with the municipalities of Royal Palm Beach and Lake Park. The possible conflicts with the other municipalities concerning this annexation is being handled by the City Manager's office, Mr. Walton added. Mr. Sabatello asked whether Area 5 of the annexation area is considered by the County as a finger extension of City boundary. Ms. Glas responded that the County considered the annexation as filling in enclaves created earlier. Mr. Sabatello asked whether the impacts on fire and police service has been reviewed. Mr. Walton said the City fire and police will service the area. He added that the County and City will enter into an Interlocal Agreement, which will determine when County services will be phased out and City services will begin. 0 5 • • • Ms. Serra stated that the MacArthur Foundation is a client of the firm where she is employed. She added that she does not believe there is a conflict of interest as the firm has not had any dealings with this petition. Ms. Serra said she will fill out the appropriate forms stating that she does not have a conflict of interest. Chairman Ornstein then opened the Public Hearing. Michael Danchuk of 6705 145th Place, Palm Beach Gardens, Fla. said he had a major concern with the description of Area 1 of the annexation, which describes the area south of the proposed Donald Ross Road extension. He added that he did not know of any proposed Donald Ross Road extension. Mr. Danchuk said that the Commission should first consider the alignment of any extension to Donald Ross Road first. Chairman Ornstein said the extension was used just to describe the property. He then asked where staff was informed about the Donald Ross Road extension. Mr. Walton said the road extension is listed on all the MacArthur Foundation Master Plans for northern Palm Beach County. Mr. Danchuk said the road extension is not listed on the County's five -year road plan. Mr. Walton said the County Land Use Map shows a route for road extension. He added that he will provide copies of the map for those interested. Mr. Rosen said the annexation does not mean the road extension will be constructed. Mr. Danchuk said the Commission may be looking for trouble from the Town of Jupiter and the residents of Palm Beach Country Estates by approving the annexation. Mrs. Debra Brockmeyer of 3554 Dann Boulevard, Lake Park presented a petition to the Commission explaining her concerns over the annexation of Area 5. She said she is concern about the possible future land use in the area. The area currently has a nonconforming industrial land use. She said the annexation would create a pocket where 0 • she and her neighbors live. Mrs. Brockmeyer said she and her neighbors are not opposed into eventually coming to the city, but, at this time, she believes the City does not have anything directly to offer the residents of the neighborhood. Gary Wilson of the MacArthur Foundation said this is a voluntary annexation, but it is something that the City requested. He added that this is not a request for development of this area. Chairman Ornstein then closed the Public Hearing. Motion Mr. Rosen moved to recommend approval to City Council of the above - referenced petition. Mr. Strassler second the motion. The motion was unanimously approved by a 7 -0 vote. Recommendation to City Council re: PUD -90 -14 - (PGA National Spa Complex PUD) Amendment to the PGA National Resort Core PUD, created by Resolution 49, 1980 and amended by Resolution 32, 1989, to relocate the spa facility, to increase the square footage, and to replace the restaurant with an aerobic building. Located within the PGA National Planned Community District. (10- 42S -42E) Ms. Glas reviewed the staff report on the above - referenced petition. Michael Swisher of Team /Plan, agent for the petitioner, questioned whether staff wanted the sign for the handicapped parking spaces to be placed in front of the hotel or the spa facility. Ms. Glas responded that the sign should be placed in front of the hotel. Motion Mr. Rosen moved to recommend approval to City Council for the above - referenced petition with the following conditions: 1. A sign be placed at the hotel circle drive entrance indicating that • 7 • • • handicapped parking services are available at the porte - cochere; 2. Landscape islands be placed after every twelve (12) parking spaces; and 3. Landscaping be installed in the northeast corner of the parking lot. Mr. James Leatherman seconded the motion. The motion was approved by a 6 -0 vote, with one abstention. Ms. Rebecca Serra abstained stating that she was not familiar enough with the above - referenced project to vote on it. Recommendation to City Council re: PUD -90 -15 - (PGA National M -30 PUD) Creation of a 152 zero lot line unit (3.34 du /ac) residential Planned Unit Development on Parcel M -30 within the PGA National Planned Community District. (15 &16- 42S -42E) Mr. Ellington reviewed the staff report for the above - referenced petition. He added that he conducted a sidewalk survey of PUDs near the subject site. He said Villa D'Este had five -foot sidewalks and Eagleton Estates had four -foot sidewalks. Mr. Walton said about 50 percent of the sidewalks we surveyed were five -feet wide. Mr. Strassler asked if the City has heard any complaints about sidewalk widths. Mr. Walton said there have been several PUDs with proposed four -foot sidewalks, which City Council changed to five feet. Mr. Hank Skokowski, agent for the petitioner, said he would request that the project have four -foot sidewalks to match the sidewalks in the neighboring Eagleton Estates project. He said he would like the project sidewalks, including those along Championship Drive, to be consistent with the sidewalks in the area. Mr. Skokowski said only two of the four possible unit types for the project have a bay window area, which would create a minimum eight -foot side setback. Concerning the other unit types, a 10 -foot side setback would be provided. He also added that he would not like to be restricted in placing two -story buildings together. Ms. Serra asked whether there are any provisions for the replacement of the trees, slated to be transplanted, in the case they die. Mr. Walton responded by saying the size of the trees being transplanted have a high survivability rating. However, he added, the Commission may wish to add a provision to be followed in case the trees die. Mr. Strassler said he was opposed to placing two -story units next to each other. He said a line of two -story units will create a claustrophobic atmosphere. Chairman Ornstein said that without certain restrictions on two -story buildings, there could be 20 two -story buildings in a row. Mr. Skokowski said he had no problem placing a reasonable restriction on the number of two -story buildings that can be constructed side -by -side. Mr. Jay Carpenter, vice president of Community Construction Corporation, said he would prefer no restriction and let the market determine the make -up of two -story and one- story homes. Mr. Hamzy said the 10 -foot side setback issue could be resolved if it is restricted to include lots which do not have an amenity such as water and open space. Mr. Skokowski said he did not have a problem with the suggestion, providing that it can be physically done on the site. Motion Mr. Rosen moved to recommend approval to City Council of the above - reference petition with the following conditions: 1. The widths of the sidewalks along the major roads through the project and within each residential tract shall be a continuance of the widths of sidewalks along the major roads and neighboring residential parcels. • 9 Mr. Carl Sabatello seconded the motion. Mr. Hamzy offered an amendment to the motion. 1. The side setback between units will be 10 feet except for those units which benefit from the amenities such as water and open space, where an eight foot setback for bay windows is allowed. Mr. Leatherman seconded the amendment to the motion. The amendment to the motion was unanimously approved by a vote of 7 -0. Ms. Serra offered a second amendment to the motion. 1. If the trees, indicated on the site plan, to be transplanted die, the petitioner must prepare a revegetation plan, to be approved by the City Forester, for the replacement of those trees. Mr. Hamzy seconded the second amendment to the motion. • The second amendment to the motion was unanimously approved by a 7 -0 vote. The motion, with the two amendments, was unanimously approved by a 7 -0 vote. WORKSHOP: CU -90 -2 - Recommendation to City Council re: (Hilarities Comedy Theater) Conditional Use in the CG -1, General Commercial District, for the operation of a performing arts theater, proposed to be located within Building "A" of the Harbour Shops, 2401 PGA Boulevard. (5- 42S -43E) WORKSHOP: CU -90 -03 and VAR -90 -01 - Recommendation to City Council re: (Hilarities Comedy Theater) Conditional Use in the CG -1, General Commercial District, for the retail sale /service of beer and wine for on- premise consumption within Building "A" of the Harbour Shops, 2401 PGA Boulevard and a variance to Chapter 112, Section 112.21 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code, relative to the distance restrictions of 750 feet between alcoholic beverage vendors. (5- 42S -43E) Mr. Ellington reviewed the staff report on the above - referenced petition. Chairman Ornstein asked where are the other vendors of alcohol located in the Harbour Shoppes. Mr. Ellington responded that the other vendors are Monterey restaurant and is 10 Parker's Lighthouse. Walter H. Wolfe, Jr., agent, stated that the reason for the move is to take advantage of the usually empty parking lot north of the shopping complex. After having no more questions or comments, the Commission agreed to schedule the above - referenced petition for Public Hearing at its September 11, 1990 meeting. WORKSHOP: PUD -90 -13 - Recommendation to City Council re: (Oakbrook Corporate Center PUD) Amendment to the Oakbrook Corporate Center PUD to consolidate the Financial Centre PUD and the Flame PUD, to modify the approved site plan, to redistribute the square footage of retail and office space and add two bank teller drive - through lanes, and to incorporate previous modifications to the approved site plan. (23 &26- 42S -42E) Mr. Ellington reviewed the staff report for the above - referenced petition. The staff report lists the questions concerning the project. Larry Smith, agent for the petitioner, said he did not have the overlay, which was • requested by Commission, because it was not in his possession. He did add that he has, for the Commission's review, the original site plan and the new proposed site. Steve Cromwell, architect for the project, reviewed the changes to the concourse and the entrances. Mr. Smith said he would like to hear from the Commission its opinion of the new plan. Responding to a question from Mr. Hamzy, Mr. Cromwell said the signage on the fountain and entrance features will be for the project name only and not for tenants. Mr. Sabatello suggested that the project's concourse and fountain be moved closer to the intersection of U.S. 1 and PGA Boulevard', so motorists may enjoy the feature. Mr. Smith said he will take a look at the suggestion. Mr. Strassler suggested placing trees at the corner of U.S. 1 and PGA Boulevard to • provide perspective for the project. 11 • Mr. Sabatello suggested placing a stronger entrance feature on the project, since the originally planned arches will not be constructed. Mr. Rosen added that the entrance should be a definite point of the arrival. Mr. Cromwell said he was happy to receive the comments to give the design team a "push in the right direction." Chairman Ornstein said he still prefers the arches for the entrance feature and that the proposed entrance wall and concourse needs to be greatly improved before he can support it. After Mr. Smith reviewed plans for the covered parking area, Commissioners urged the petitioner to redesign the covered parking structure. Mr. Smith said the change in the plan resulted in a minor change in the amount of green space. Mr. Walton stated that Mr. Smith should present the overlay, which details the change of the amount of green space, at the next meeting. Mr. Smith agreed. • Commissioners also said that the site plan was confusing and Mr. Smith needs to submit new site plans to depict site data for the entire site. Chairman Ornstein said Mr. Smith needs to provide staff with all the information they have requested before the next meeting. If not, the next meeting, which will be a Public Hearing, will be postponed, he said. Commissioners said they were confused by plans for the drive -thru bank. Mr. Smith said he will provide more detailed plans at the next meeting. Mr. Smith said the petitioner will provide for screening for the back flow preventer. Chairman Ornstein urged the petitioner to replace the median strip along the PGA Boulevard entrance. Mr. Smith said the petitioner will revisit the entrance to see what can be done. Mr. Smith presented three photographs of the existing satellite dish on the site to the 12 Commission for its review. He added that there would be landscaped screening around the satellite dish. Ms. Serra asked whether the satellite dish could be moved to another portion of the site. Mr. Smith responded that it could be relocated to the southwest portion of the site. Several Commissioners said that they would prefer to see the satellite dish removed. Mr. Smith said that he has submitted a statement of the impact fees paid for the project. Mr. Walton stated that staff will send a letter to Mr. Smith stating that the City does not have record of the payment of impacts and the amount of impact fees stated is inaccurate. Mr. Smith also added that landscaping along PGA Boulevard will be provided when the street is widened by the state Department of Transportation. At the request of the Commission, Mr. Smith said he would provide a signage package • for the project. Chairman Ornstein said he would like the back lot of the site to be sodded and irrigated. Mr. Sabatello said he would prefer a mulching and seeding program, which would not require a lot of water. Mr. Walton said he conducted a visit to the site and he has additional concerns. He said he would like the site plans to indicate all property lines, easement line and right - of -way lines. Mr. Hamzy said he would like a complete master site plan drawn to scale, which is readable and complete. The petition is scheduled for a Public Hearing on September 11, 1990. Chairman Ornstein reiterated that the petitioner needs to submit all the requested information to . staff for review well before the Public Hearing. If the information is not presented 13 then the Public Hearing will be postponed, Chairman Ornstein said. There being no further business to come before the Commission, the meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. � f James Leatherman • Alan Strassler r" Ix Marty R.A. Minor, Secretary • 14 Gfl Sabatello ., FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR 07UNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS AST NAME —FIRST NAME— M1D011 NAME S e c a oa _A-� ek e_ . o�, S �ILING ADDRESS I oS �Ddq wo ©�tle- NAME OF BOARD. COUNCIL. COMMISSION. AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE Via' 6" AA,4 Gncls Afon/nI a•d ;->0,71h9, THE BOARD. COUNCIL. COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF: CI 1 V ) COUNTY OTHER I.00AI AGENCY L'IT) ( a r, e COUN'rl' 'Gal ✓QuCVI GCAr en S NAML OI• PUIITIC'AL SUBDIVISION: DA1 E ON WHICH Vol E OCCURRED IF / ?a NO MY Post HON IS: WHO MUST FILE FORM 81111 ELECTIVE /APPOINTIVE This form is for use by any.person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; alihough the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES a-LECTED OFFICERS: A person holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. In either case, you should disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and , WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting oil a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral or written communication, whether made by the officer or at his direction. -IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: .• You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. • A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest. I "K.M 911 ul•ae PAGE • I`F YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. You should complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST I, Bx0-bV-C-CCk- S • 52 C `OL __ , hereby disclose that on _a�Us* 19��: (a) A measure came e-ramr be1'ore my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain, or i,t Pao ✓ inured to the speciai gain of %�C Z_rl os!1 - Catgr.o tea- -I-- e • , by �rho,ij d : tiai;ted. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: '. P�� CPS- z_8Q -d4) C�/ Pcb Date Filed Signal IO NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES $112.317 (1985), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF. THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE Ok EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000. E FORM 8B - 10.86 PAGE r. F RM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR O-OUNTY, MUNICIPAL AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LAST NAME —FIRST NAML—MIDOL L NAME ADDRESS l d /D 5 CITN ?aim &ado 6arcl2n DATE ON WHICH V011: OCCURRED S NAME OF BOARD. COUNCIL. COMMISSION. AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE � ((N4 eDQ //]7j_s iu ti -z&A r, THE BOARD, COUNCIL. COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF: r C'11 1 COUNTY oTHER LOCAL AGENCY COUNTI' v p r NAML OF Pot ITIC'AL SUBDIVISION: �Q l n► I�Ptc crt MY Post PION IS: .. ELECTIVE C APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 811 This form is for use by any.Person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It _applies equally to members of advisory. and non - advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. The requirements of this law are mandatory; almoug1h the use of this particular form is not required by law, you are encouraged to use it in making the disclosure required by law. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES &LECTED OFFICERS: A person holding elective county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited .from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is retained. In either case, you should disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assenibly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and , WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. o' APPOINTED OFFICERS: A person holding appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his special private gain. Each local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a measure which inures to the special gain of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he is, retained. A person holding an appointive local office otherwise may participate in a matter in which he has a conflict of interest, but must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision by oral Or written communication, whether made by the officer or at his direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: �• You should complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. • A copy of the form should be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form should be read publicly at the meeting prior to consideration of the matter in which you have a conflict of interest. I hK \I KB PAGE M I YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: • You should disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You should complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST S 4 ErPN, hereby disclose that on _ G:,il,c �8 19 2-n : (a) A measure came or- w4tl -,w�before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain; or Aky .Pitr��Y ,-'inured to the speciai gain of � � t1 �w , ley V"40,11 S. dff rt:ained. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my interest in the measure is as follows: /o, a tA JAY P Date Filed Signature ONOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES $112.317 (Wt 35), A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $5,000. E FORM 88 • tod86 PAGE