Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z 062789CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION JUNE 27, 1989 REGULAR MEETING The Regular Meeting of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida was called to order by Chairman Don Vogel, at 7:30 P.M. in the Assembly Room at the Municipal Complex, 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. The roll was called by the secretary, and present were: Don Vogel, Chairman; Robert Hamner, Mike Rosen, Jeffrey Ornstein, Members; Domenick Lioce, Alternate Member. Mr. Rich Walton, Planning and Zoning Director, introduced Mr. Craig Van Nuland, recently employed Planning Intern with the • Planning and Zoning Department. The Commission welcomed Mr. Van •, Nuland. WORKSHOP: Z -89 -04 - Recommendation to City Council re: (Prosperity Corporate Plaza) Rezone 7.71 -acre parcel on the southwest corner of Prosperity Farms Road and RCA Blvd. from CN (Neighborhood Commercial) and PO (Professional Office) to PUD with underlying zoning of PO for an office complex consisting of three four -story buildings with 146,964 square feet of total building area. (8- 42S -43E) Mr. Rich Walton, Planning and Zoning Director, addressed the Commission stating three 4 -story office buildings are being proposed with surface parking. Comments received from LBF &H indicate they have no major concerns. Additional information has been requested from the applicant pertaining to preservation of existing Oak and Banyan trees on site. 1 j • Mr. Walton stated that Kahart Pinder, with David Plummer & Associates, has indicated he needs further clarification /informa- tion pertaining to traffic. Mr. Steve Mathison, authorized agent for the petitioner, intro- duced Mr. Jeffrey Ornstein, Project Architect. Mr. Ornstein addressed the Commission stating for the record that he is the Project Architect and that he has ,a conflict of interest with this project, as he is also a member of the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Mathison added that Mr. Ornstein will defer from any considerations involving the project. Mr. Mathison presented a site plan and advised that.489 parking • spaces have been provided, with 57 additional reserve spaces, to be used in the event a bank or savings & loan leases space within the project. Mr. Mathison stated that questions raised by Mr. Walton regarding landscaping, tree preservation and traffic will be thoroughly addressed prior to the Public Hearing. Mr. Jeff Blakley, Landscape Architect, presented a landscape plan and stated that an agreement has been worked out with Jon Iles, City Forester, to preserve 60% of all trees on site. • Mr. Walton stated that a quantification of the mangroves to be removed will also be required. Mr. Gary Robert Krielow, 4213 Hickory Drive, one of the owners of the subject property, addressed the Commission pointing out the location of the property and the land uses surrounding the site. F • • • This project will be scheduled for Public Hearing before the Commission on July 11, 1989. Recommendation to City Council - PUD -89 -13 - Amend Gardens Mall PUD - Providing for sale & service of beer and wine for on -prem- ise consumption at " Sbarro" (6- 42S -43E) A representative for this petition was not present. Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, addressed the Commission stating the Manager of Sbarro has advised that their corporate headquarters is in Tampa, and the petitioner was not informed that it would be necessary to attend this meeting. Mr. Ellington stated the determination was made by Bill Brant, City Attorney, that the petitioner is not required to apply for a Variance to the 750' distance requirement since the restaurant is within a planned center. Therefore, the petitioner is not sub- ject to the requirement that 51% of revenue be generated from the sale of food. The restaurant will be restricted to the mall hours of operation. Chairman Vogel called for comments from the public, with no response. Mr. Rosen made a motion to recommend approval to the City Council for the above - referenced petition with no conditions. Mr. Hamner seconded the motion. The motion carried with a vote of 4 - 1, with Mr. Ornstein voting nay. 3 WORKSHOP: Z -89 -05 - Recommendation to City Council re: (Lake Catherine) Rezoning of 75.13 -acre parcel north of Northlake Blvd. on the east and west sides of MacArthur Blvd. from PDA and RH to PUD for construction of 289 residential units. (18- 42S -43E) At the request of a member of the public, Chairman Vogel gave an explanation of the abbreviations PUD, PDA and RH, and briefly reviewed the public notification procedures. Chairman Vogel advised that the subject property is not public, but privately held land owned by the MacArthur Foundation. Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, addressed the Commission pointing out the location and surrounding zoning designations. Mr. Ellington reviewed the site plan and stated the petitioner will be dedicating a 10.79 acre park area, east of MacArthur Blvd., to the City. In addition, a 3 acre passive park, directly across from the middle school, will be dedicated to provide public access to Lake Catherine. A 5' polycoated chain link fence and 25' buffer will be provided along the southern property line. Staff questions whether this buffer will be adequate. Mr. Ellington reviewed comments /concerns received from Mr. David Getz, with LBF &H. Mr. Robert Hamner asked why the parcel to the southwest, current- ly in the County, is not being brought in as a part of this project. Mr. Ray Royce, Attorney representing the petitioner, responded that the parcel is an approved project in the County. Mr. Royce reviewed lot sizes, proposed setbacks, and stated the proposed density is less than 4 units per acre. 4 • Mr. Don Hearing, with GBS &H, reviewed the site plan. Mr. Hearing stated the existing lake will be expanded to accommodate project drainage and that a secondary entrance point will be provided to Silverthorn Road, currently an unimproved road. An additional 20' of R.O.W along the western boundary will be provided to accommodate the future expansion of Silverthorn Road. Silver - thorn will be paved from 91st street to the secondary entrance. A 6' masonary wall will be constructed along the western bound- ary. Mr. Hearing presented architectural elevations and discussed setbacks, sq. footages of the various unit types, and phasing of the project. Mr. Ornstein expressed concern with the side -load- ing garage units being brought closer to the street, since fami- lies with children will be primarily utilizing the front yard. Mr.-Ornstein stated he feels the proposed project is an inappro- priate use of the property. Mr. Hearing stated the School Board will be providing a letter to the City regarding the project. Mr. Ornstein expressed concern with making a right turn into a side garage on a 50' lot; inade- quate front yard setbacks; and inadequate buffering along MacArthur Blvd. Mr. Walton questioned how the small area in the northwest corner of the site, excluded from the development, would be maintained. Mr. Hearing advised it would probably be maintained by the property owners association. Mr. Hearing stated the traffic • study, prepared by Kimley Horn, indicates the project is insig- 5 • • • nificant in terms of traffic. Although David Getz has suggested the 20' R.O.W on MacArthur Blvd. be increased to 241, Mr. Steve Godfrey, Traffic Engineer with Kimley -Horn, has advised this is not a good solution as it may increase traffic speed and use of the road. Mr. Hearing pointed out the locations of recreation areas and also the parks proposed to be dedicated to the City. Mr. Ornstein stated he feels a condition of approval should be that all improvements must be completed prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy. Mr. Rosen expressed the following concerns /comments: The density is too high at the north end of the project; suggests the landscape plans address improvements to the median and irri- gation, at the developers cost; the pool size must be adequate to serve the residents of the development since the City recreation facilities are overcrowded; buffer zones will need to be widened along MacArthur Blvd., due to safety concerns for the school children; he objects to the corner areas being carved out for commercial development. Mr. Lioce expressed concern with the buffers proposed for the perimeter, and suggested a condition be placed on the approval restricting the project to 1 story units. Mr. Lioce requested' the petitioner address how the northwestern parcel will be used and also who owns the parcel on the northeast corner and how it will be used. V In response to questions by Mr. Lioce, Mr. Hearing stated that the multi- family density is approximately 6.5 - 7.5 dwelling units per acre on a net basis, and the single - family is approxi- mately 2.9 - 3. Mr. Hamner stated he has no objection to the setbacks for the single - family on the Earman River because it provides a greater separation. Mr. Hamner stated he would encourage the petitioner to incorporate the parcel along Northlake Blvd., currently in the County, into this project. Mr. Ornstein asked if the school has agreed to allow parking on their property. Mr. Hearing advised that that the school has 0 indicated that their facilities are available to the public. After discussion, the Commission directed staff to schedule this project for a Public Hearing before the Commission on July 25, 1989. WORKSHOP: 2 -89 -07 - Recommendation to City Council re: (Garden Oaks Estates) Rezoning and site plan approval of a 239.49 -acre parcel north of Burns Road, West of Prosperity Farms Road, south of RCA Blvd., and approximately 1,000 feet east of Alt. A -1 -A from PDA to PUD for construction of a 900 -unit residential devel- opment (7 &8- 42S -43E) Bristol Ellington, City Planner, addressed the Commission review- ing the applicant's request. Mr. Ellington stated that if the extention of Campus Drive is to be dedicated to the City, staff questions whether it will meet the City's minimum standards. Other staff concerns include adequacy of the buffer along RCA 7 • • • Blvd. and Burns Road; the size of the canopy and the amount of existing plant materials. Mr. Ornstein expressed concern with the length of the 1300' cul- de -sac on the southwest corner. Mr. Don Hearing, authorized agent for the petitioner, presented a site plan and gave a brief overview of the project, discussing traffic circulation, buffering and recreational area, which consists of an 11 -acre park. Mr. Hearing stated there are no specific development plans at this time for the proposed office park. Single- family homes are immediately north of the office park, but they will be appropriately buffered. The overall buildout of the project is anticipated in 1994. Mr. Hearing advised that David Getz suggested, and the petitioner has agreed, to provide additional ROW along RCA Blvd. & Burns Road. Details of buffering, tree preservation, traffic and roadway improvements will be presented at the Public Hearing. Mr. Rosen expressed concern with the density of the single - family area and also with the problem of installing pools at a later date, since the setbacks and zero lot line situation prevent construction machinery access. Mr. Rosen suggested providing bike /pedestrian paths along Burns Road and RCA Blvd. Mr. Ornstein requested the applicant provide prospectives of the proposed units, the streetscape, and also plans for the commer- cial parcel. Mr. Ornstein expressed the following concerns/ 8 • comments: The site plan does not -allow for the flexibility to relocate units in order to preserve existing trees; the units should be staggered; the park area could be reduced in order to provide recreation facilities, including pool; parking needs to be provided for the park area; information pertaining to how the phasing will relate to roadway improvements needs to be submit- ted. Mr. Lioce stated he objects to the commercial parcel because of the surrounding residential. Mr. Hamner stated he is concerned with the traffic situation on Burns Road. Chairman Vogel stated he would have to see a site plan for the • commercial parcel before he could vote in favor of it. Chairman Vogel requested that realistic traffic information be submitted, rather than the usual "insignificant traffic" reports. The Commission directed staff to schedule this project for a Workshop Meeting before the Commission on July 11, 1989 and the Public Hearing for July 25, 1989. PREAPLICATION REVIEW: - PUD -89 -15 - Recommendation to City Coun- cil re: (JDM Parcel 1) Creation of a 105 -unit medium density zero lot line residential PUD on 18.81 acres within JDM Country Club on Parcel 1 (11- 42s -42E) Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, reviewed the applicant's request and stated the proposed density is 5.6 d/u per acre. 1�Mr. Ellington stated the applicant has not indicated setbacks for E • pools and screen enclosures. As a guide, staff suggests 7' mini- mum for side and rear for pools and spas, and 5' minimum for screen enclosures. Mr. Ellington advised that Mr. David Gets, of LBF &H, has revised his staff report but it has not yet been received. Mr. Mark Hendrickson, Assistant City Forester, has indicated he has no problems with the project. Planning Staff would like to see details of the recreational area, and understands that they will be submitted at this meeting. Mr. Ellington stated that Mr. Getz has expressed concern with the • golf cart access going through the development, down a road, and out another T- turnaround. Mr. Hank Skokowski, authorized agent for the petitioner, ad- dressed the Commission stating the JDM Master Plan has been amended and a rendering will be provided to the City within the next two weeks. Mr. Skokowski presented and discussed the site plan for the project, including buffering and recreational area. Mr. Bob Wilhelm, Architect with Richardson, Nagy, Martin Architects, addressed the Commission presenting architectural elevations and discussing style, various colors to be used, and materials. The Commission requested a master plan be submitted showing the colors assigned to individual lots. 10 • Mr. Skokowski stated there is not an actual plan available, however, a statement will be submitted indicating that certain color tones will be used and in no case will the same two color tones be placed next to each other. Mr. John Lang, Landscape Architect with Printwheel Design, pre- sented landscape plans. Mr. Ornstein suggested providing an access from the parking area directly to the entrance, eliminating the need for people to walk in the street. Mr. Lang presented a graphic indicating the location of the entry • sign. Mr. Ornstein stated he objects to the proposed plan to have golf carts travel along a narrow roadway, rather than going through the woods along the north side of the fairway. Mr. Skokowski stated the roadway is not heavily traveled and the residents on the street will be aware that during the morning to early afternoon period, a golf cart will use their street to get from from hole #8 to hole #9. Mr. Lioce stated his objection to the proposed plan and stated the golfers will not know where to go after leaving hole #8. Mr. Ornstein suggested windows be provided on the side elevation units. Mr. Skokowski requested the Commission consider making a recom- mendation to the City Council at this meeting. After discussion, 11 • Mr. Rosen made a motion to recommend approval to the City Council for the above - referenced PUD, with the proviso that the petition- er comply with the June 27, 1989 statement of proposed conditions of approval, attachments, and the memo from LBF &H dated 6/21/89. Mr. Hamner seconded the motion. Mr. Ornstein made a motion to amend Mr. Rosen's motion to include that staff will not send this petition on to the City Council until completely satisfied. Mr. Lioce seconded the motion, which was unanimously approved. The original motion, as amended, was unanimously approved. Preapplication Review - PUD -89 -15 - Recommendation to City Coun- cil re: (Hidden Hollow) Amending Hidden Hollow PUD to modify the site plan approved by Ordinance 16, 1987 and adopted 12/3/87 from 50 multiple - family (6.2 du's /ac) units to 37 single - family (4.6 du's /ac) residential lots on a 8.05 -acre parcel approximately 2,600 ft. west of Military Trail on the south side of Lake Park West Road. (23- 42S -42E) Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, addressed the Commission stating this amendment to the PUD will reduce the density from 6.2 d /u's /ac to 4.6 du's /ac. Mr. Ellington stated the applicant has designed the site anticipating expansion of Northlake Blvd. The developer is not providing on -site recreation, however, will be.contributing the same amount of recreation impact fees that were required of the original PUD. • A letter has been received from the Northern Palm Beach Water Control District stating that if the eastern lots are reduced by 12 • • •' 10' to provide for a maintenance easement, the Water Control District will have objection to the project. Mr. Hank Skokowski, authorized agent for the petitioner, ad- dressed the Commission stating the petitioner has agreed to deed property along the edge of the existing canal to the Northern Palm Beach County Water Control District, and reduce the lot depth in that area. The petitioner has also agreed to maintain the entire bank edge along the canal. Mr. Skokowski presented a graphic of the entry sign, landscape drawings and architectural drawings. Mr. Skokowski stated the drawings are for illustrative purposes and would like to preserve the option of working with the homeowners to provide for the single- family housing. During discussion, there were no major areas of concern identi- fied, therefore, the project will be moved forward to Public Hearing on 7/25/89. PREAPPLICATION REVIEW - PUD -89 -18 - Recommendation to City Coun- cil re: (The Legends) Amending PGA National PUD, Parcel M -11, to construct a sliding entrance gate with a gate house and a water fountain. (9- 42S -42E) Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, addressed the Commission reviewing the staff report for the subject petition. Mr. Ellington stated the only concern staff has with this project is the fact that the gate house is unmanned. A median cut has not been provided for visitor turn - around, which will be needed if a visitor cannot gain entry because the party he wishes to visit is 13 • not at home. Mr. Ellington stated there would seem to be room to move the median, to provide for a cut, while keeping the gate where it is presently located. Ms. Donna Cesaro, Project Planner with Urban Design Studio, addressed the Commission stating the residents of The Legends wish to install the sliding gate in order to create a perceived sense of security. The residents will be provided with a remote control device to gain entry or to exit the development. Visitors wishing to turn around will be able to call security or the POA to gain access through the gate in order to turn around. Ms. Cesaro stated this project has been reviewed by Fire, Police • and Sanitation, with no adverse comments. They will be issued private access codes. A discussion ensued regarding the effectiveness of security gates. Mr. Rich Walton, Planning and Zoning Director, asked if the notification sign has been put in place and was advised that it has been. Mr. Walton stated that similar projects have encoun- tered problems because the vote of the homeowners association, to pursue the PUD amendment, was not unanimous. Mr. Walton asked about the vote for this project and was advised that there was not an official vote since the developer is still in control of the project. However, at this time there are only 15 homeowners, all of whom were in favor of the proposed amendment. The Commission requested that staff be provided with a certified 14 • copy of the minutes of the meeting where this amendment was approved. Mr. Ornstein made a motion to recommend approval to the City Council for the above - referenced PUD with the condition that prior to going before the City Council, the petitioner provide staff with the minutes of the Homeowner's Association meeting at which this amendment was approved. Mr. Lioce seconded the motion. The motion was unanimously passed. PREAPPLICATION REVIEW: PUD -89 -17 - Recommendation to City Council re: (Golden Bear Plaza) Amending Golden Bear Plaza PUD located on the east side of U.S. Highway #1 at Holman Road to obtain new signage approvals. (4- 42S -43E) Mr. Rich Walton, Planning and Zoning Director, stated the appli- cant is requesting clarification of what was originally approved. Mr. Walton advised that Mr. Jack Hanson, Building Official, feels certain that the requested signage is not the same as that approved. Mr. Walton stated the requested amendment is as follows: 1. A new sign for the animal hospital 2. Relocation of the animal hospital sign 3. Increase the faces on the approved wall sign from 3 on each wing to 8 on each wing 4.. An additional chevron - shaped wall sign is being requested at the entrance of the new buioding. Mr. David Shaw, Attorney representing the applicant, presented the approved site plan for the project and stated the minutes of the City Council meeting at which the signage was approved do not 49 • • reflect what was actually approved. Mr. Ornstein asked what copy will appear on the tenant signage. Mr. Shaw advised that the tenant names are not yet known. He is seeking approval for the style, design, size and number of signs only. Mr. Ornstein stated he would object to logos on the sign. Chairman Vogel stated he feels the Golden Bear project is one of the nicest looking in the City. Mr. Ron Antill presented elevations of the proposed signage. A discussion ensued regarding what was originally approved. Mr. Walton advised that the proposed signage states "Dog Boarding" for the animal hospital, but boarding is not allowed in the project zoning district. The Commission directed that the wording be changed. It was the concensus of the Commission that the sign wall be limited to 3 faces on each wing. The Commission agreed that the additional sign wall would be acceptable, limited to 3 faces on each wing. The Commission directed that this project be moved on to Public Hearing, to be held on July 25, 1989. WORKSHOP: Z -89 -06 - Recommendation to City Council re: (Crystal Point South) Rezoning 'of 77± acre parcel south of Burns Road and west of Prosperity Farms Road from RM to PUD with underlying zoning of RM for construction of 310 residential units (8-425 - 43E) 16 • e Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, pointed out the location of the proposed project and reviewed the applicant's request. Mr. Ellington advised that the applicant has indicated there is a .5 acre wetlands existing on the site. Mr. Ellington stated letters will be required from DER and SFWMD indicating jurisdiction and whether or not this is a functional wetlands. Mr. Ellington stated there appears to be a conflict between the School Board and the developer. The School Board development encroaches on a portion of land now owned by Engle homes. A land swap between Engle Homes and the School Board was discussed, however, the School Board has determined that due to the in- plan, but has since revised the plan, deleting the conflict area. Mr. Ellington stated that staff has been concerned with how the proposed loop road will tie into the main road. At this time there is only one access to Allamanda School. Mr. Ellington stated there are some problems with drainage. Mr. David Getz, with LBF &H, is in the process of reviewing the project and will be providing a letter with his comments. A discussion ensued regarding the existing road, canal, and Oak trees on site. Mr. Bob Bentz, Architect with Land Design South, representing the applicant, reviewed the site plan and pointed out the location of • the proposed access point, approximately 1/4 mile south of Burns a 17 creased trip generation, they do not wish to pursue the swap. The developer originally included all of the land in their site plan, but has since revised the plan, deleting the conflict area. Mr. Ellington stated that staff has been concerned with how the proposed loop road will tie into the main road. At this time there is only one access to Allamanda School. Mr. Ellington stated there are some problems with drainage. Mr. David Getz, with LBF &H, is in the process of reviewing the project and will be providing a letter with his comments. A discussion ensued regarding the existing road, canal, and Oak trees on site. Mr. Bob Bentz, Architect with Land Design South, representing the applicant, reviewed the site plan and pointed out the location of • the proposed access point, approximately 1/4 mile south of Burns a 17 • Road, west of Prosperity Farms Road, a portion of which is cur- rently in the Village of North Palm Beach. Mr. Bentz advised that the portion that is in North Palm Beach will be purchased by the petitioner. Mr. Bentz stated there is currently an agreement between MacArthur Foundation and North Palm Beach guaranteeing the Engle Group access to the subject property. A discussion ensued regarding density, site plan elements and densities of surrounding areas. Mr. Bentz advised thats a lake will serve as a natural buffer on the north, west, and a portion of the south of the project. A 6' wall /hedge will be provided on a portion of the site. The homeowners association will maintain all trees that do not abut lots. Mr. Rosen expressed concern with the site plan stating that every unit possible was "squashed" in with no imagination. Mr. Rosen pointed out that at this meeting, 1500 residential units have been proposed, of which 1200 are on Burns Road. Mr. Bentz stated the density is less than half of that allowed in RM, the current zoning. Mr. Rosen stated traffic on Burns Road is a major concern and the overall situation must be reviewed by Kahart Pinder. Mr. Walton stated that no comments have been received from Mr. Pinder at this time. A discussion ensued regarding traffic concerns. 18 i Mr. Bentz recapped his presentation and discussed setbacks, entry features and zipper concept. Mr. Bentz stated the road extending out to Prosperity Farms Road will be a private road. This project is to be scheduled for Public Hearing on July 25, 1989. Mr. John Kraynick, Executive Vice President of the Engle Group, addressed the Commission stating they have a reputation of being a quality builder and they are proud of their product. Mr. Kraynick stated he has met with residents in the area to deter- _ mine their wishes and needs, and the site plan that has resulted • from those meetings represents good planning. This project is scheduled for Public Hearing on July 25, 1989. • NEW BUSINESS Chairman Vogel asked Mr. Walton to relay to Mr. John Orr, City Manager, that he feels it is an injustice to the petitioners, and all concerned, for the meetings to last until 12:15 A.M. Chair- man Vogel stated that perhaps consideration should be given to holding meetings every week to accommodate the increased number of ,projects coming into the City. "Pt c • ADJOURNMENT , There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 12:15 A.M. The next meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission will be held Tuesday, July 25, 1989. - -`6 - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- OGEL jRBERT C TOSHNER JEFFR RNSTEIN MIK SEN DOMENICK LIO - ------------ - - - - -- - - - -- JEAN LONG, SECRE Y 20