HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z 062789CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
JUNE 27, 1989
REGULAR MEETING
The Regular Meeting of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
was called to order by Chairman Don Vogel, at 7:30 P.M. in the
Assembly Room at the Municipal Complex, 10500 North Military
Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and opened with the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
The roll was called by the secretary, and present were: Don
Vogel, Chairman; Robert Hamner, Mike Rosen, Jeffrey Ornstein,
Members; Domenick Lioce, Alternate Member.
Mr. Rich Walton, Planning and Zoning Director, introduced Mr.
Craig Van Nuland, recently employed Planning Intern with the
• Planning and Zoning Department. The Commission welcomed Mr. Van
•,
Nuland.
WORKSHOP: Z -89 -04 - Recommendation to City Council re:
(Prosperity Corporate Plaza) Rezone 7.71 -acre parcel on the
southwest corner of Prosperity Farms Road and RCA Blvd. from CN
(Neighborhood Commercial) and PO (Professional Office) to PUD
with underlying zoning of PO for an office complex consisting of
three four -story buildings with 146,964 square feet of total
building area. (8- 42S -43E)
Mr. Rich Walton, Planning and Zoning Director, addressed the
Commission stating three 4 -story office buildings are being
proposed with surface parking. Comments received from LBF &H
indicate they have no major concerns. Additional information has
been requested from the applicant pertaining to preservation of
existing Oak and Banyan trees on site.
1
j
•
Mr. Walton stated that Kahart Pinder, with David Plummer &
Associates, has indicated he needs further clarification /informa-
tion pertaining to traffic.
Mr. Steve Mathison, authorized agent for the petitioner, intro-
duced Mr. Jeffrey Ornstein, Project Architect. Mr. Ornstein
addressed the Commission stating for the record that he is the
Project Architect and that he has ,a conflict of interest with
this project, as he is also a member of the Planning and Zoning
Commission. Mr. Mathison added that Mr. Ornstein will defer from
any considerations involving the project.
Mr. Mathison presented a site plan and advised that.489 parking
• spaces have been provided, with 57 additional reserve spaces, to
be used in the event a bank or savings & loan leases space within
the project. Mr. Mathison stated that questions raised by Mr.
Walton regarding landscaping, tree preservation and traffic will
be thoroughly addressed prior to the Public Hearing.
Mr. Jeff Blakley, Landscape Architect, presented a landscape plan
and stated that an agreement has been worked out with Jon Iles,
City Forester, to preserve 60% of all trees on site.
•
Mr. Walton stated that a quantification of the mangroves to be
removed will also be required.
Mr. Gary Robert Krielow, 4213 Hickory Drive, one of the owners of
the subject property, addressed the Commission pointing out the
location of the property and the land uses surrounding the site.
F
•
•
•
This project will be scheduled for Public Hearing before the
Commission on July 11, 1989.
Recommendation to City Council - PUD -89 -13 - Amend Gardens Mall
PUD - Providing for sale & service of beer and wine for on -prem-
ise consumption at " Sbarro" (6- 42S -43E)
A representative for this petition was not present.
Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, addressed the Commission
stating the Manager of Sbarro has advised that their corporate
headquarters is in Tampa, and the petitioner was not informed
that it would be necessary to attend this meeting.
Mr. Ellington stated the determination was made by Bill Brant,
City Attorney, that the petitioner is not required to apply for a
Variance to the 750' distance requirement since the restaurant is
within a planned center. Therefore, the petitioner is not sub-
ject to the requirement that 51% of revenue be generated from the
sale of food. The restaurant will be restricted to the mall
hours of operation.
Chairman Vogel called for comments from the public, with no
response.
Mr. Rosen made a motion to recommend approval to the City
Council for the above - referenced petition with no conditions.
Mr. Hamner seconded the motion. The motion carried with a vote
of 4 - 1, with Mr. Ornstein voting nay.
3
WORKSHOP: Z -89 -05 - Recommendation to City Council re: (Lake
Catherine) Rezoning of 75.13 -acre parcel north of Northlake Blvd.
on the east and west sides of MacArthur Blvd. from PDA and RH to
PUD for construction of 289 residential units. (18- 42S -43E)
At the request of a member of the public, Chairman Vogel
gave an explanation of the abbreviations PUD, PDA and RH, and
briefly reviewed the public notification procedures. Chairman
Vogel advised that the subject property is not public, but
privately held land owned by the MacArthur Foundation.
Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, addressed the Commission
pointing out the location and surrounding zoning designations.
Mr. Ellington reviewed the site plan and stated the petitioner
will be dedicating a 10.79 acre park area, east of MacArthur
Blvd., to the City. In addition, a 3 acre passive park, directly
across from the middle school, will be dedicated to provide
public access to Lake Catherine.
A 5' polycoated chain link fence and 25' buffer will be provided
along the southern property line. Staff questions whether this
buffer will be adequate.
Mr. Ellington reviewed comments /concerns received from Mr. David
Getz, with LBF &H.
Mr. Robert Hamner asked why the parcel to the southwest, current-
ly in the County, is not being brought in as a part of this
project. Mr. Ray Royce, Attorney representing the petitioner,
responded that the parcel is an approved project in the County.
Mr. Royce reviewed lot sizes, proposed setbacks, and stated the
proposed density is less than 4 units per acre.
4
• Mr. Don Hearing, with GBS &H, reviewed the site plan. Mr. Hearing
stated the existing lake will be expanded to accommodate project
drainage and that a secondary entrance point will be provided to
Silverthorn Road, currently an unimproved road. An additional
20' of R.O.W along the western boundary will be provided to
accommodate the future expansion of Silverthorn Road. Silver -
thorn will be paved from 91st street to the secondary entrance.
A 6' masonary wall will be constructed along the western bound-
ary.
Mr. Hearing presented architectural elevations and discussed
setbacks, sq. footages of the various unit types, and phasing of
the project. Mr. Ornstein expressed concern with the side -load-
ing garage units being brought closer to the street, since fami-
lies with children will be primarily utilizing the front yard.
Mr.-Ornstein stated he feels the proposed project is an inappro-
priate use of the property.
Mr. Hearing stated the School Board will be providing a letter to
the City regarding the project. Mr. Ornstein expressed concern
with making a right turn into a side garage on a 50' lot; inade-
quate front yard setbacks; and inadequate buffering along
MacArthur Blvd.
Mr. Walton questioned how the small area in the northwest corner
of the site, excluded from the development, would be maintained.
Mr. Hearing advised it would probably be maintained by the
property owners association. Mr. Hearing stated the traffic
• study, prepared by Kimley Horn, indicates the project is insig-
5
•
•
•
nificant in terms of traffic. Although David Getz has suggested
the 20' R.O.W on MacArthur Blvd. be increased to 241, Mr. Steve
Godfrey, Traffic Engineer with Kimley -Horn, has advised this is
not a good solution as it may increase traffic speed and use of
the road. Mr. Hearing pointed out the locations of recreation
areas and also the parks proposed to be dedicated to the City.
Mr. Ornstein stated he feels a condition of approval should be
that all improvements must be completed prior to the first
Certificate of Occupancy.
Mr. Rosen expressed the following concerns /comments:
The density is too high at the north end of the project; suggests
the landscape plans address improvements to the median and irri-
gation, at the developers cost; the pool size must be adequate to
serve the residents of the development since the City recreation
facilities are overcrowded; buffer zones will need to be widened
along MacArthur Blvd., due to safety concerns for the school
children; he objects to the corner areas being carved out for
commercial development.
Mr. Lioce expressed concern with the buffers proposed for the
perimeter, and suggested a condition be placed on the approval
restricting the project to 1 story units. Mr. Lioce requested'
the petitioner address how the northwestern parcel will be used
and also who owns the parcel on the northeast corner and how it
will be used.
V
In response to questions by Mr. Lioce, Mr. Hearing stated that
the multi- family density is approximately 6.5 - 7.5 dwelling
units per acre on a net basis, and the single - family is approxi-
mately 2.9 - 3.
Mr. Hamner stated he has no objection to the setbacks for the
single - family on the Earman River because it provides a greater
separation. Mr. Hamner stated he would encourage the petitioner
to incorporate the parcel along Northlake Blvd., currently in the
County, into this project.
Mr. Ornstein asked if the school has agreed to allow parking on
their property. Mr. Hearing advised that that the school has
0 indicated that their facilities are available to the public.
After discussion, the Commission directed staff to schedule this
project for a Public Hearing before the Commission on July 25,
1989.
WORKSHOP: 2 -89 -07 - Recommendation to City Council re: (Garden
Oaks Estates) Rezoning and site plan approval of a 239.49 -acre
parcel north of Burns Road, West of Prosperity Farms Road, south
of RCA Blvd., and approximately 1,000 feet east of Alt. A -1 -A
from PDA to PUD for construction of a 900 -unit residential devel-
opment (7 &8- 42S -43E)
Bristol Ellington, City Planner, addressed the Commission review-
ing the applicant's request. Mr. Ellington stated that if the
extention of Campus Drive is to be dedicated to the City, staff
questions whether it will meet the City's minimum standards.
Other staff concerns include adequacy of the buffer along RCA
7
•
•
•
Blvd. and Burns Road; the size of the canopy and the amount of
existing plant materials.
Mr. Ornstein expressed concern with the length of the 1300' cul-
de -sac on the southwest corner.
Mr. Don Hearing, authorized agent for the petitioner, presented a
site plan and gave a brief overview of the project, discussing
traffic circulation, buffering and recreational area, which
consists of an 11 -acre park. Mr. Hearing stated there are no
specific development plans at this time for the proposed office
park. Single- family homes are immediately north of the office
park, but they will be appropriately buffered. The overall
buildout of the project is anticipated in 1994.
Mr. Hearing advised that David Getz suggested, and the petitioner
has agreed, to provide additional ROW along RCA Blvd. & Burns
Road. Details of buffering, tree preservation, traffic and
roadway improvements will be presented at the Public Hearing.
Mr. Rosen expressed concern with the density of the single - family
area and also with the problem of installing pools at a later
date, since the setbacks and zero lot line situation prevent
construction machinery access. Mr. Rosen suggested providing
bike /pedestrian paths along Burns Road and RCA Blvd.
Mr. Ornstein requested the applicant provide prospectives of the
proposed units, the streetscape, and also plans for the commer-
cial parcel. Mr. Ornstein expressed the following concerns/
8
•
comments: The site plan does not -allow for the flexibility to
relocate units in order to preserve existing trees; the units
should be staggered; the park area could be reduced in order to
provide recreation facilities, including pool; parking needs to
be provided for the park area; information pertaining to how the
phasing will relate to roadway improvements needs to be submit-
ted.
Mr. Lioce stated he objects to the commercial parcel because of
the surrounding residential.
Mr. Hamner stated he is concerned with the traffic situation on
Burns Road.
Chairman Vogel stated he would have to see a site plan for the
• commercial parcel before he could vote in favor of it. Chairman
Vogel requested that realistic traffic information be submitted,
rather than the usual "insignificant traffic" reports.
The Commission directed staff to schedule this project for a
Workshop Meeting before the Commission on July 11, 1989 and the
Public Hearing for July 25, 1989.
PREAPLICATION REVIEW: - PUD -89 -15 - Recommendation to City Coun-
cil re: (JDM Parcel 1) Creation of a 105 -unit medium density
zero lot line residential PUD on 18.81 acres within JDM Country
Club on Parcel 1 (11- 42s -42E)
Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, reviewed the applicant's
request and stated the proposed density is 5.6 d/u per acre.
1�Mr. Ellington stated the applicant has not indicated setbacks for
E
•
pools and screen enclosures. As a guide, staff suggests 7' mini-
mum for side and rear for pools and spas, and 5' minimum for
screen enclosures.
Mr. Ellington advised that Mr. David Gets, of LBF &H, has revised
his staff report but it has not yet been received. Mr. Mark
Hendrickson, Assistant City Forester, has indicated he has no
problems with the project. Planning Staff would like to see
details of the recreational area, and understands that they will
be submitted at this meeting.
Mr. Ellington stated that Mr. Getz has expressed concern with the
• golf cart access going through the development, down a road, and
out another T- turnaround.
Mr. Hank Skokowski, authorized agent for the petitioner, ad-
dressed the Commission stating the JDM Master Plan has been
amended and a rendering will be provided to the City within the
next two weeks.
Mr. Skokowski presented and discussed the site plan for the
project, including buffering and recreational area.
Mr. Bob Wilhelm, Architect with Richardson, Nagy, Martin
Architects, addressed the Commission presenting architectural
elevations and discussing style, various colors to be used, and
materials.
The Commission requested a master plan be submitted showing the
colors assigned to individual lots.
10
•
Mr. Skokowski stated there is not an actual plan available,
however, a statement will be submitted indicating that certain
color tones will be used and in no case will the same two color
tones be placed next to each other.
Mr. John Lang, Landscape Architect with Printwheel Design, pre-
sented landscape plans.
Mr. Ornstein suggested providing an access from the parking area
directly to the entrance, eliminating the need for people to walk
in the street.
Mr. Lang presented a graphic indicating the location of the entry
• sign.
Mr. Ornstein stated he objects to the proposed plan to have golf
carts travel along a narrow roadway, rather than going through
the woods along the north side of the fairway.
Mr. Skokowski stated the roadway is not heavily traveled and the
residents on the street will be aware that during the morning to
early afternoon period, a golf cart will use their street to get
from from hole #8 to hole #9.
Mr. Lioce stated his objection to the proposed plan and stated
the golfers will not know where to go after leaving hole #8.
Mr. Ornstein suggested windows be provided on the side elevation
units.
Mr. Skokowski requested the Commission consider making a recom-
mendation to the City Council at this meeting. After discussion,
11
•
Mr. Rosen made a motion to recommend approval to the City Council
for the above - referenced PUD, with the proviso that the petition-
er comply with the June 27, 1989 statement of proposed conditions
of approval, attachments, and the memo from LBF &H dated 6/21/89.
Mr. Hamner seconded the motion.
Mr. Ornstein made a motion to amend Mr. Rosen's motion to
include that staff will not send this petition on to the
City Council until completely satisfied. Mr. Lioce seconded the
motion, which was unanimously approved.
The original motion, as amended, was unanimously approved.
Preapplication Review - PUD -89 -15 - Recommendation to City Coun-
cil re: (Hidden Hollow) Amending Hidden Hollow PUD to modify the
site plan approved by Ordinance 16, 1987 and adopted 12/3/87 from
50 multiple - family (6.2 du's /ac) units to 37 single - family (4.6
du's /ac) residential lots on a 8.05 -acre parcel approximately
2,600 ft. west of Military Trail on the south side of Lake Park
West Road. (23- 42S -42E)
Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, addressed the Commission
stating this amendment to the PUD will reduce the density from
6.2 d /u's /ac to 4.6 du's /ac. Mr. Ellington stated the applicant
has designed the site anticipating expansion of Northlake Blvd.
The developer is not providing on -site recreation, however, will
be.contributing the same amount of recreation impact fees that
were required of the original PUD.
• A letter has been received from the Northern Palm Beach Water
Control District stating that if the eastern lots are reduced by
12
•
•
•'
10' to provide for a maintenance easement, the Water Control
District will have objection to the project.
Mr. Hank Skokowski, authorized agent for the petitioner, ad-
dressed the Commission stating the petitioner has agreed to deed
property along the edge of the existing canal to the Northern
Palm Beach County Water Control District, and reduce the lot
depth in that area. The petitioner has also agreed to maintain
the entire bank edge along the canal.
Mr. Skokowski presented a graphic of the entry sign, landscape
drawings and architectural drawings. Mr. Skokowski stated the
drawings are for illustrative purposes and would like to preserve
the option of working with the homeowners to provide for the
single- family housing.
During discussion, there were no major areas of concern identi-
fied, therefore, the project will be moved forward to Public
Hearing on 7/25/89.
PREAPPLICATION REVIEW - PUD -89 -18 - Recommendation to City Coun-
cil re: (The Legends) Amending PGA National PUD, Parcel M -11, to
construct a sliding entrance gate with a gate house and a water
fountain. (9- 42S -42E)
Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, addressed the Commission
reviewing the staff report for the subject petition. Mr.
Ellington stated the only concern staff has with this project is
the fact that the gate house is unmanned. A median cut has not
been provided for visitor turn - around, which will be needed if a
visitor cannot gain entry because the party he wishes to visit is
13
•
not at home. Mr. Ellington stated there would seem to be room to
move the median, to provide for a cut, while keeping the gate
where it is presently located.
Ms. Donna Cesaro, Project Planner with Urban Design Studio,
addressed the Commission stating the residents of The Legends
wish to install the sliding gate in order to create a perceived
sense of security. The residents will be provided with a remote
control device to gain entry or to exit the development.
Visitors wishing to turn around will be able to call security or
the POA to gain access through the gate in order to turn around.
Ms. Cesaro stated this project has been reviewed by Fire, Police
• and Sanitation, with no adverse comments. They will be issued
private access codes.
A discussion ensued regarding the effectiveness of security
gates.
Mr. Rich Walton, Planning and Zoning Director, asked if the
notification sign has been put in place and was advised that it
has been. Mr. Walton stated that similar projects have encoun-
tered problems because the vote of the homeowners association, to
pursue the PUD amendment, was not unanimous. Mr. Walton asked
about the vote for this project and was advised that there was
not an official vote since the developer is still in control of
the project. However, at this time there are only 15 homeowners,
all of whom were in favor of the proposed amendment.
The Commission requested that staff be provided with a certified
14
•
copy of the minutes of the meeting where this amendment was
approved.
Mr. Ornstein made a motion to recommend approval to the City
Council for the above - referenced PUD with the condition that
prior to going before the City Council, the petitioner provide
staff with the minutes of the Homeowner's Association meeting at
which this amendment was approved. Mr. Lioce seconded the
motion. The motion was unanimously passed.
PREAPPLICATION REVIEW: PUD -89 -17 - Recommendation to City
Council re: (Golden Bear Plaza) Amending Golden Bear Plaza PUD
located on the east side of U.S. Highway #1 at Holman Road to
obtain new signage approvals. (4- 42S -43E)
Mr. Rich Walton, Planning and Zoning Director, stated the appli-
cant is requesting clarification of what was originally approved.
Mr. Walton advised that Mr. Jack Hanson, Building Official, feels
certain that the requested signage is not the same as that
approved. Mr. Walton stated the requested amendment is as
follows:
1. A new sign for the animal hospital
2. Relocation of the animal hospital sign
3. Increase the faces on the approved wall sign from 3 on
each wing to 8 on each wing
4.. An additional chevron - shaped wall sign is being requested
at the entrance of the new buioding.
Mr. David Shaw, Attorney representing the applicant, presented
the approved site plan for the project and stated the minutes of
the City Council meeting at which the signage was approved do not
49
•
•
reflect what was actually approved.
Mr. Ornstein asked what copy will appear on the tenant signage.
Mr. Shaw advised that the tenant names are not yet known. He is
seeking approval for the style, design, size and number of signs
only.
Mr. Ornstein stated he would object to logos on the sign.
Chairman Vogel stated he feels the Golden Bear project is one of
the nicest looking in the City.
Mr. Ron Antill presented elevations of the proposed signage.
A discussion ensued regarding what was originally approved.
Mr. Walton advised that the proposed signage states "Dog
Boarding" for the animal hospital, but boarding is not allowed in
the project zoning district. The Commission directed that the
wording be changed.
It was the concensus of the Commission that the sign wall be
limited to 3 faces on each wing. The Commission agreed that the
additional sign wall would be acceptable, limited to 3 faces on
each wing.
The Commission directed that this project be moved on to Public
Hearing, to be held on July 25, 1989.
WORKSHOP: Z -89 -06 - Recommendation to City Council re: (Crystal
Point South) Rezoning 'of 77± acre parcel south of Burns Road and
west of Prosperity Farms Road from RM to PUD with underlying
zoning of RM for construction of 310 residential units (8-425 -
43E)
16
•
e
Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, pointed out the location of
the proposed project and reviewed the applicant's request. Mr.
Ellington advised that the applicant has indicated there is a .5
acre wetlands existing on the site. Mr. Ellington stated letters
will be required from DER and SFWMD indicating jurisdiction and
whether or not this is a functional wetlands.
Mr. Ellington stated there appears to be a conflict between the
School Board and the developer. The School Board development
encroaches on a portion of land now owned by Engle homes. A land
swap between Engle Homes and the School Board was discussed,
however, the School Board has determined that due to the in-
plan, but has since revised the plan, deleting the conflict area.
Mr. Ellington stated that staff has been concerned with how the
proposed loop road will tie into the main road. At this time
there is only one access to Allamanda School.
Mr. Ellington stated there are some problems with drainage. Mr.
David Getz, with LBF &H, is in the process of reviewing the
project and will be providing a letter with his comments.
A discussion ensued regarding the existing road, canal, and Oak
trees on site.
Mr. Bob Bentz, Architect with Land Design South, representing the
applicant, reviewed the site plan and pointed out the location of
• the proposed access point, approximately 1/4 mile south of Burns
a 17
creased trip
generation,
they do not wish to
pursue the swap.
The developer
originally
included all of the
land in their site
plan, but has since revised the plan, deleting the conflict area.
Mr. Ellington stated that staff has been concerned with how the
proposed loop road will tie into the main road. At this time
there is only one access to Allamanda School.
Mr. Ellington stated there are some problems with drainage. Mr.
David Getz, with LBF &H, is in the process of reviewing the
project and will be providing a letter with his comments.
A discussion ensued regarding the existing road, canal, and Oak
trees on site.
Mr. Bob Bentz, Architect with Land Design South, representing the
applicant, reviewed the site plan and pointed out the location of
• the proposed access point, approximately 1/4 mile south of Burns
a 17
•
Road, west of Prosperity Farms Road, a portion of which is cur-
rently in the Village of North Palm Beach. Mr. Bentz advised
that the portion that is in North Palm Beach will be purchased by
the petitioner. Mr. Bentz stated there is currently an agreement
between MacArthur Foundation and North Palm Beach guaranteeing
the Engle Group access to the subject property.
A discussion ensued regarding density, site plan elements and
densities of surrounding areas. Mr. Bentz advised thats a lake
will serve as a natural buffer on the north, west, and a portion
of the south of the project. A 6' wall /hedge will be provided on
a portion of the site. The homeowners association will maintain
all trees that do not abut lots.
Mr. Rosen expressed concern with the site plan stating that every
unit possible was "squashed" in with no imagination. Mr. Rosen
pointed out that at this meeting, 1500 residential units have
been proposed, of which 1200 are on Burns Road. Mr. Bentz stated
the density is less than half of that allowed in RM, the current
zoning.
Mr. Rosen stated traffic on Burns Road is a major concern and the
overall situation must be reviewed by Kahart Pinder.
Mr. Walton stated that no comments have been received from Mr.
Pinder at this time. A discussion ensued regarding traffic
concerns.
18
i
Mr. Bentz recapped his presentation and discussed setbacks, entry
features and zipper concept. Mr. Bentz stated the road
extending out to Prosperity Farms Road will be a private road.
This project is to be scheduled for Public Hearing on July 25,
1989.
Mr. John Kraynick, Executive Vice President of the Engle Group,
addressed the Commission stating they have a reputation of being
a quality builder and they are proud of their product. Mr.
Kraynick stated he has met with residents in the area to deter-
_ mine their wishes and needs, and the site plan that has resulted
• from those meetings represents good planning.
This project is scheduled for Public Hearing on July 25, 1989.
•
NEW BUSINESS
Chairman Vogel asked Mr. Walton to relay to Mr. John Orr, City
Manager, that he feels it is an injustice to the petitioners, and
all concerned, for the meetings to last until 12:15 A.M. Chair-
man Vogel stated that perhaps consideration should be given to
holding meetings every week to accommodate the increased number
of ,projects coming into the City.
"Pt
c
•
ADJOURNMENT ,
There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was
adjourned at 12:15 A.M. The next meeting of the Planning and
Zoning Commission will be held Tuesday, July 25, 1989.
- -`6 - - - - - - -- - - - - - -- ----- - - - - --
OGEL jRBERT C TOSHNER
JEFFR RNSTEIN
MIK SEN DOMENICK LIO -
------------ - - - - -- - - - --
JEAN LONG, SECRE Y
20