HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes P&Z 072589CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
JULY 25, 1989
REGULAR MEETING
The Regular Meeting of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida,
was called to order by Chairman Don Vogel, at 7:30 P.M. in the
Assembly Room at the Municipal Complex, 10500 North Military
Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and opened with the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
The roll was called by the secretary, and present were: Don
Vogel, Chairman; Jeffrey Ornstein, Mike Rosen, Robert Hamner,
Members. Domenick Lioce, Alternate Member.
The minutes of the meetings of June 13, and June 27, 1989
Vwere unanimously approved as submitted.
Public Hearing: Z -89 -05 - Recommendation to City Council re:
(Lake Catherine) Rezoning of 75.13 -acre parcel north of Northlake
Blvd. on the east and west sides of MacArthur Blvd. from PDA and
RH to PUD with uses designated in RM and RS -2 for construction of
298 residential units. NOTE: The applicant requested
continuance to August 1, 1989 at 7:30 P.M. at.the Community
Center. (Adv. 7- 10 -89) (18- 428 -43E)
Chairman Vogel advised that the petitioner has requested a
continuance of this project to August -1, 1989. This meeting will
be held at the City's Community Center where seating is available
to accommodate the large number of people interested in this
petition.
Mr. Lioce made a motion to recess the Public Hearing to August 1,
1989 at 7:30 P.M. Mr. Ornstein seconded the motion which passed
unanimously.
1
7 -as -g9
e+ z Ps rJ-
Public Hearing: 2-89 -07 - Recommendation to City Council re:
(Garden oaks Estates) Rezoning and site plan approval of a
239.49 -acre parcel north of Burns Road, west of Prosperity Farms
Road, south of RCA Blvd., and approximately 1,000 feet east of
Alt. A -1 -A from PDA to PUD with uses designated in RS -2 and RM
for construction of a 900 -unit residential development. (Adv.-7-
10-89) (7 &8- 423 -43E)
Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, distributed site plans to
the Commission and discussed the revisions that have been made
since the last meeting. Mr. Ellington stated that Mr. Kahart
Pinder, the City's Traffic consultant, has just returned from
vacation and has not had an opportunity to review the site plan
or to submit comments on the revisions.
A letter has been received from the School Board expressing
concern with the overcrowding that will occur in the elementary
and high school as a result of this project. The City has recom-
• mended that the County impose a Countywide impact fee for the
School Board. Mr. Ellington stated that staff recommends this
project be continued pending resolution of all unresolved issues,
as referenced in staff report dated 7/20/89.,
Mr. Ellington advised that Mr. Mark Hendrickson, Assistant City
Forester, still has problems with the office park and is not
prepared to recommend conditions of approval at this time. Mr.
Hendrickson is satisfied with the conditions for the residential
portion of the project.
Mr. Raymond Royce, authorized agent for the petitioner, addressed
the Commission stating the development will fill a need for
moderately priced housing in the City. There will be no gate-
houses and only one street, Campus Drive, will run through the
2
.t
_ development. Campus Drive will be a public street, with private
streets being provided for the remainder of the community.
Walkways will be provided on the north side of Burns Road and RCA
Blvd. The site plan has been revised to show surrounding uses,
driveways and streets, as requested by staff. An additional 20'
of R.O.W..will be dedicated on the north side of Burns Road to
accommodate any future widening that may be necessary. An emer-
gency vehicle access easement has also been provided.
Mr. Rich Walton, Planning and Zoning Director, advised of a
letter from Mr. John Orr, City Manager, regarding his negotia-
tions for recreation facilities and status of traffic concerns.
Mr. Walton advised that significant progress has been made in
these areas.
Mr. Royce stated the petitioner is working with City administra-
tion and with the Engle Group, developers of another project, to
provide a major recreational opportunity in this area and that
discussions with Mr. Orr have indicated the impact fees generated
from this development, and the Engle development, will total
close to two million dollars. Mr. Royce stated he feels a pro-
gram can be implemented for well under that amount to make all
the necessary improvements to Burns road and he feels that
through appropriate negotiations with the County, the money can
be earmarked for Burns Road.
Mr. Ornstein suggested, and Mr. Don Hearing, with GBS &H Archi-
tects, agreed to consider providing a boulevard effect for Campus
Drive.
3
Mr. Rosen expressed the following concerns /comments:
1. Burns Rd. & RCA Blvd. should be treated the same in terms of
landscape buffering.
2. Traffic concerns cannot be addressed until Mr. Pinder has
submitted his comments.
3. A market study should be undertaken to determine the number
of families with children, and the resulting impact on
schools.
4. The stated density is misleading since other single - family
home areas do not take the lakes into consideration.
5. The site plan indicates parking is planned on the inner and
outer circle of the cul -de -sac, which would be a safety
hazard for children.
6. A plan for recreational facilities needs to be provided.
7. The existing walkway on Burns Rd. is inadequate. A larger
sidewalk, pedestrian /bike path needs to be provided on the
project side.
8. Information is needed re: Burns Road drainage.
9. The site plan does not allow for the construction of
swimming pools after the units have been built.
10. The City's Traffic Consultant was asked to study
Burns Road and the major intersections of
Prosperity Farms Rd. & Alt. A -1 -A for the overall
anticipation of RCA, JDM, Engle Group, etc., with a
resolution of what the impacts will be.
11. If RCA Blvd. needs to be widened, the R.O.W. should be
taken from the project side of the road.
Mr. Phil Vogelsang, Engineer for Burg & DiVosta, gave a brief
history of the project, and advised that improvements have been
made to Burns Road including construction of a control structure
and installation of additional pipe under Burns Road, doubling
the capacity. Mr. Vogelsang stated further improvements will not
be necessary.
•
4
Mr. Steve Godfrey, Traffic Engineer with Kimley -Horn, reviewed
the traffic associated with this project and others in the area.
Mr. Godfrey advised that from a capacity standpoint, the single
access from each property onto Campus Dr. is adequate. From a
traffic volume standpoint, the traffic accessibility is adequate.
In response to questions by Mr. Ornstein, Mr. Godfrey advised
that approximately 4900 project trips per day are anticipated on
Gardens East /Campus Drive, with a total volume of 8600. Between
60 -65% will be attributed to project trips.
Mr. Godfrey advised of improvements planned for roadways /inter-
sections impacted by this project and presented a map showing an
area from Military Trail to State Road 811, and then from 811 to
• Prosperity Farms Road. Mr. Godfrey discussed existing conditions
and future needs for Burns Road'and Riverside Dr.
Mr. Hamner stated he anticipates major problems developing, since
approximately 5000 single- family units have been approved since
the first of the year, not including office buildings. Mr.
Hamner stated he is concerned with the quality of life for
Gardens' residents 5 years from now.
Mr. Rosen requested a response from Mr. Royce pertaining to the
profile of Burns Rd. buffer vs. RCA Blvd. and asked if it would
be changed. Mr. Royce responded in the negative. Mr. Royce
stated he does not believe this project will significantly impact
the School Board; a bike path on the Burns Rd. side and the north
side of RCA Blvd. will be added on to what is existing so that it
5
is continuous; it acres will be donated for recreation.
Chairman Vogel declared the Public Hearing open.
The following residents addressed the Commission, expressing the
concerns listed:
Mr. Fred Style, 2726 Burns Rd., Moderator of the Congregation of
Tropical Sands Christian Church
Mr. Gary Nagel, 2560 Prosperity Oaks Court, resident just north
of the proposed office park
Mr. Gerald Toothman, 1058 Greentree Drive
Mr. Jeff Renault, 11043 Oakway Circle
Mr. John Hewitt, 8 Alnwick Road, on behalf of St. Marks Episcopal
Church
Mr. Ted Mintel, 1021 Raintree Drive
Mr. Paul Oliver, 1031 Raintree
Mr. Israel Levine, Dogwood Avenue resident
- Who will maintain landscaping around the property
• - The intersection of Campus Dr. & Gardens East Dr. is unsafe
for elementary students
- A walkway is needed for access to Allamanda School
- The proposed park is inaccessible to the public
- Traffic impact
- Objection to the 2 -story office park, height and location.
The office park should be moved toward Burns Road.
- Objection to the proposed bike path on the north side of
RCA Blvd.
- Objection to a lesser buffer being proposed for RCA Blvd.
- Traffic impact on the intersection of Prosperity Farms Road &
RCA Blvd., as it is currently a dangerous area
2 -lane situation at Town Oaks is currently a problem - this
project will make it worse
Access to St. Marks Church will be a problem
Too many projects have been proposed for the Burns Road area.
R
•
•
- The entrance to St. Marks Episcopal Church is very close to
Campus Dr. intersection. A turn lane will be needed to avoid
cars stacking up.
- Traffic study should be conducted during the school year
rather than the summer months.
There being no further comments from the public, the Hearing was
closed.
A discussion ensued regarding possible signalization of intersec-
tions impacted by the proposed development.
Mr. Lioce stated he feels a phasing program is needed and ex-
pressed concern with the appearance of the elevations along RCA
Blvd. and Burns Road, as they are all the same.
Mr. Rosen moved to continue the Public Hearing to August 22,
1989. The motion was seconded. The motion passed with a vote of
3 -2, with Mr. Ornstein and Mr. Lioce voting Nay.
Public Hearing: Z -89 -06 - Recommendation to City Council re:
(Crystal Pointe South) Rezoning of a 77± acre parcel south of
Burns Road and west of Prosperity Farms Road from RM to PUD with
underlying zoning of RM for construction of 295 residential
units. (Adv. 7/10/89) (8- 42S -43E)
Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, presented a site plan and
pointed out the location of the subject project and development
in the surrounding areas. Mr. Ellington stated that due to
unresolved issues, as referenced in staff report dated 7/20/89,
and concerns expressed by surrounding property owners, planning
staff recommends this petition be recessed.
Mr. Raymond Royce, authorized agent for the petitioner, addressed
7
the Commission stating the petitioner has been working with the
School Board with regard to platting streets and providing them
with legal access, easement areas for on -site retention and other
improvements. A publicly dedicated street will be provided to
the school, all other streets within the development will be
private, maintained by the POA.
Mr. Royce advised that the wetlands area consists of .13 acres,
but he does not believe it is a viable wetland. A linear park
will be provided and dedicated to the City, if the City desires.
The POA will maintain all common areas. Mr. Royce presented a
conceptual drawing of the lake area and recreational facilities.
If additional recreational facilities are required by the City, a
is monetary contribution will be made to enhance the existing facil-
U_J
ities or to improve recreational facilities planned for Garden
Oaks. Mr. Royce presented and discussed architectural eleva-
tions. The petitioenr would be agreeable to putting road impact
fees from this project into the same pool to provide for the
improvements on Burns Rd.
Planning and Zoning Commissioners expressed concerns /comments'as
follows:
- 7 1/2' setbacks proposed for the estate lots should be
increased to 101.
- Only one project entrance should be provided, on Prosperity
Farms Rd., to alleviate traffic problems on Burns Rd.
- A plan needs to be submitted for relocation of the Gopher
Tortoises on site.
8
• - The proposed 20' x 40' swimming pool will not be adequate to
serve 207 units.
- Pools cannot be installed after the units have been built,
since there will not be adequate room for construction equip
ment to enter.
- The model homes should be relocated to internal lots because
of the high traffic volume in the school area.
- The model homes should be eliminated and the land be incorpor-
ated into easements for the school. This would separate the
school from the development.
- A profile and landscape plan needs to submitted of the
proposed 60' R.O.W. for the main road.
- The proposed post lights for each unit pose a problem because
when street lights burn out, no one replaces them.
- The site plan is not well - planned and offers no opportunity
for landscaped islands, beautification, or saving existing
trees.
• - The long, narrow streets could become speedways and, there-
fore, pose a safety hazard for children.
•
- The sales trailer must be a temporary situation.
It was the concensus of the Commission that traffic and school
issues will have to be reviewed prior to making a recommendation
to the City Council.
Mr. Hamner stated he does not agree that the size of the pool is
inadequate.
Chairman Vogel declared the Public Hearing open.
The following residents addressed the Commission expressing the
concerns listed:
Q
�J
Mr. Arman L. Wessell, 2629 Pepperwood Circle, Spokesman for the
PTO of Allamanda School
Mr. Gerald Toothman, 1058 Greentree Drive
Mr. Dennis Kelly, Village Manager of North Palm Beach
Mr. Fred Style, 2726 Burns Rd., Moderator of the Congregation of
Tropical Sands Christian Church
Dr. Robert Baltek, 10401 Prosperity Farms Road
Mr. Leon St. John, 2551 Pepperwood
Ms. Jean Miller, Meridian Park property owner
Mr. Paul Alder, 1031 Raintree
Mr. Alan Strassler, 1145 Rainwood Circle
Mr. Maurice Longo, 932 Evergreen Drive
- Safety of the children during and after construction.
- The four lots on the school side of the project should be
removed.
- Traffic problems at the project entrances.
- Potential drainage problems
- Potential stacking problems with loading /unloading children._
- Problems with street parking for parents & staff
- Elimination of the Oak Trees, Mangroves, Gopher Tortoises,
vegetation, alligators and Blue Herons.
- An accurate tree survey needs to be submitted.
- Requested that this discussion be postponed until developers
meet with representatives of the School Board and the PTO.
- Requested that Allamanda Drive stay as it currently exists,
and would like a sidewalk 6 -8' wide on one side.
- Requested that the area be preserved as a wildlife sanctuary.
- Information was requested regarding the status of Allamanda
Drive from the canal north, as to whether it will remain a
private road. If it will become a public road, how will it
be modified.
- Objections to the single - family in Rainwood abutting zipper
lot line homes.
10
- Site plan configuration will cause trapping of water.
Suggests the contour be modified to provide a swale area
area for accommodating the run -off.
Mr. Arman L. Wessel, 2629 Pepperwood Circle, presented a plan
showing how the project traffic could be rerouted, separating
school traffic from development traffic.
Mr. Dennis Kelly, Manager of North Palm Beach, expressed concerns
of North Palm Beach residents, including:
- Buffering between the proposed development and the Village
boundaries.
- Would prefer Allamanda Drive remain as it is.
- A petition has been submitted to North Palm Beach requesting
a sidewalk be provided at the west end of Allamanda to
accommodate bike and pedestrian traffic.
Mr. Kelly stated the Village of North Palm Beach Engineer has
expressed serious concerns over the proposed size of the weir
located at the northeast corner of the project, and is not sure
if this was built to handle the existing development and the
current flow, as opposed to future development. Concerns also
include traffic impact, as it relates to the northern street that
is propopsed to ingress /egress onto Prosperity Farms Road. The
North Palm Beach Planning Consultant for the Comprehensive Plan,
in the traffic element, did not include site specific develop-
ments of this project or Garden Oaks. It is imperative that more
site specific data be obtained to determine the volume to
capacity ratios.
•
11
•
Mr. Kelly advised of a Settlement Agreement between the Village
of North Palm Beach and the MacArthur Foundation dated 3/9/88,
which includes a provision that Commercial development may be
provided within an area near the proposed project. Mr. Royce
A
stated there are no plans for Commercial development in conjunc-
tion with this project, and the property in question is not owned
by the petitioner.
Mr. August Hernandez, representing the School Board, stated the
School Board has been working with the developer on issues such
as traffic, and will continue to work with the developers toward
the resolution of this issue. Mr. Hernandez stated the School
• Board is mainly concerned with the safety of the children. At
•
this time, no formal agreement has been finalized with the Engle
Group and that more time and information is needed. Information
pertaining to the impacts of this project, Lake Catherine, Garden
Oaks and JDM will be provided to the Commission when available.
Mr. Rich Walton, Planning and Zoning Director, stated that Mr.
Hendrickson has not yet approved the landscape plan.
Mr. Lioce made a motion to recess the Public Hearing to August
22, 1989 at 7:30 P.M. Mr. Ornstein seconded the motion which
passed unanimously.
12
•
PREAPPLICATION REVIEW: PUD -89 -17 - Recommendation to City Coun-
cil re: (Golden Bear Plaza) Amending Golden Bear Plaza PUD locat-
ed on the east side of U.B. Highway #1 at Holman Road to obtain
new signage approvals 'and extend the hours of operation for the
Executive Dining Club. (4- 428 -43E)
Mr. J. Barry Curtain, Attorney with Fleming, Hale & Shaw, repre-
senting the petitioner, addressed the Commission stating a pri-
vate dining club has been approved for the 6th floor of the 3rd
tower at Golden Bear Plaza, currently under construction. The
petitioner is requesting that the hours of operation be extended
from 10:00 P.M. to 12:00 Midnight, Sunday through Thursday, 1:00
A.M. on Friday and Saturday and 2:00 A.M. on New Year's Eve.
• The Commission stated the signage portion of this petition will
be heard at the Public Hearing.
Public Hearing: PUD -89 -16 - Recommendation to City Council re:
(Hidden Hollow) Amending Hidden Hollow PUD to modify the site
plan approved by Ordinance 16, 1987 and adopted 12/3/87 from 50
Multi- family (6.2 du's /ac) units to 37 single - family (4.6
du's /ac) residential lots on a 9.05 -acre parcel approximately
2,600 ft. west of Military Trail on the.south side of Lake Park
West Road. (Adv. 7/10/89) (23- 42S -42E)
Mr. Bristol.Ellington, City Planner, addressed the Commission
reviewing the Staff Report dated 7/20/89 for the subject peti-
tion.
Mr. Ellington requested the applicant clarify whether the inter-
nal roadways will be privately or publicly maintained. If pub-
licly, there is a question as to the adequacy of the right-of-
0 way. The R.O.W. is proposed to be 361, however, the City Council
13
• has adopted guidelines establishing 38' as the minimum R.O.W.
standard.
Mr. Ellington stated that an agreement has been reached between
the petitioner and the Northern Palm Beach County Water Control
District whereby the petitioner will dedicate a 10' easement at
the rear of the property for the maintenance of the canal.
Mr. Ellington stated that if the Commission is prepared to recom-
mend approval of the subject petition, staff recommends Condition
#1 thru #5 of the staff report be made a part of the approval.
A discussion ensued regarding the R.O.W. Mr. Rich Walton, Direc-
tor of Planning and Zoning, stated that he would have concerns
over accepting public roads that do not meet the minimum standard
• of the City.
Ms. Sara Lockhart, with Urban Design Studio, addressed the Com-
•
mission stating the proposed plan represents a 26% reduction in
density over the original PUD approval, with an overall density
of 4.6 units per acre.
Ms. Lockhart stated a 57' R.O.W. will be dedicated on Northlake
Blvd., a westbound left turn lane will be provided for access
into the project entrance, and 20' will be provided for north-
bound left and right turn lanes.
Ms. Lockhart stated the roads will be publicly dedicated and
advised that Mr. David Getz, with LBF &H, has indicated that he
has no objection to the 36' R.O.W. Ms. Lockhart will clarify
that Mr. Getz' statement applied to publicly dedicated roads.
14
Mr. Ted Sabatello stated he would either provide the R.O.W. or
leave the roads private. If he decided to make the roads public,
and had to provide the 381, Mr. Sabatello stated he would proba-
bly decrease the size of the lake, which could be done easily.
Ms. Lockhart presented a Landscape Plan and discussed entry
treatment, street tree program and buffering.
Chairman Vogel declared the Public Hearing open.
Ms. Sherry Roby, representing the owners of adjacent property,
requested that buffering be provided between the properties. Ms.
Lockhart stated a 6' high, 5' wide ficus hedge is proposed in
that area.
There being no further comments from the public, the Hearing was
closed.
• Mr. Ornstein made a motion to recommend approval to the City
Council with all the conditions as outlined in the staff report.
Mr. Rosen seconded the motion which was unanimously approved.
•
PREAPPLICATION REVIEW: PUD -89 -24 - Recommendation to City Coun-
cil re: (JDM Parcel 5a) Creation of 31 -unit one and two -story
zero lot line residential Planned Unit Development within JDM
Country Club on Parcel 5a. (11- 42S -42E)
Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, addressed the Commission
stating the staff report addresses a concern pertaining to the
overall PCD. There has been excavation without City approval,
and grading and clearing is taking place within 100 feet of the
rear property lines of existing homes. Homeowners documents have
15
not been received, neither the master drainage plan nor roadway
plan have been approved. Staff recommends holding off on approv-
al of this project in order to give staff the opportunity to
determine the status of the PCD.
Mr. Rich Walton, Planning and Zoning Director, stated over 20% of
the PUD's have been approved, without having approval from the
City Engineer. A construction permit has been obtained from the
City for the Golf Course only.
Ms. Donna Cesaro, with Urban Design Studio, introduced Mr. Ken
Blair, of Hansen Properties, and asked Mr. Blair to advise the
Commission as to the status of the JDM project.
Mr. Blair stated he was informed by Mr. Len Lindahl, City Engi-
neer that he has no problem with the work going on at the site
and that permits have been obtained for all work being done.
• Mr. Walton stated that an overall site plan is needed, since
PUD's are being submitted with acreages increased from what was
•
allowed by the PCD. Mr. Walton stated that his general concern
is the speed with which the final PUD's are being approved, with-
out the master drainage, roads, etc., being underway.
Mr. Jeff Ornstein suggested that the Commission direct staff to
prepare a report on the status of the entire JDM Country Club for
presentation at the next meeting. Mr. Ornstein further stated he
does not want to review this project until the applicant has
submitted a final approved master plan for the PCD.
Ms. Cesaro advised that an update of the master plan has been
16
submitted to Mr. John Orr, City Manager, and as soon as approval
is received, copies will be submitted to the Planning and Zoning
• Department. Ms. Cesaro presented the originally approved Master
Plan and noted it has been updated. The updates resulted from
minor shifts in acreages.
Mr. Ornstein and Mr. Lioce expressed concern with the changes to
the Master Plan since the original approval, and stated the
changes have not been insignificant, but major modifications to
the Master Plan.
Ms. Cesaro presented and reviewed the site plan for Parcel 5a and
responded to comments received from Mark Hendrickson, Assistant
City Forester and Dave Getz, City's Engineer.
It was the concensus of the Commission that this petition will be
heard again at the next meeting, and at that time a determination
• will be made as to whether sufficient information has been re-
•
ceived pertaining to the status of the entire PCD to make a
formal recommendation to the City Council.
Preapplication Review: PUD -89 -22 - Recommendation to City Coun-
cil re: (PGA National Administrative Building) Amending PGA of
America PUD within the PGA National PCD to build a 3,787 sq. ft.,
two -story addition to the existing building and additional park-
ing lot with 50 parking spaces. (10- 42S -42E)
Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, addressed the Commission
pointing out the location of the project and reviewing the appli-
cant's request.
Mr. Ornstein requested information pertaining to the original PUD
approval.
17
Mr. Rich Walton, Planning and Zoning Director, informed the
Commission that staff has requested information from the appli-
cant as to clarification of the original approvals, but this
information has not been submitted. Staff has not been able to
locate this information, but will research and advise of the
findings at the next meeting.
Mr. Ellington reviewed the staff report dated 7/20/89 and advised
that revised landscape plans were received today, however, Mark
Hendrickson, Assistant City Forester, has not had an opportunity
to review the plans.
Mr. Walton advised that the original PUD was adopted by Ordinance
rather than Resolution, therefore, a legal question exists as to
whether it will be necessary to advertise the Public Hearing.
Mr. Walton stated he will request a determination from Mr. Bill
0 Brant, City Attorney.
Mr. Ed Dailey, with Schwab & Twitty Architects, addressed the
Commission stating the additional parking spaces have been re-
quested by the PGA Association, since some overcrowding does
exist in the parking lot. Renovation is planned for the lower
floor of one wing of the building, which may result in an in-
crease in the number of employees.
Mr. Dailey presented a landscape plan indicating that all exist-
ing trees in the proposed parking area will be replanted.
Mr. Ornstein expressed concern with losing landscaping to provide
for additional parking.
-0
18
•
Mr. Rosen stated that information regarding the original approval
of this PUD is available in the PGA DRI books.
Preapplication Review: Z -89 -23 - Recommendation to City Council
Re: (Promenade Shopping Plaza) Amending Gardens East Plaza
(a /k /a Promenade Shopping Plaza) PUD for approval of a neon light
in the window at Moonlight Cafe. (7- 42S -43E)
Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, reviewed the staff report
dated 7/20/89.
Mr. Rich Walton, Planning and Zoning Director, stated the appli-
cant was cited and found in violation of the sign code for the
• neon light. This request is for an amendment to the PUD to allow
0'
the neon light.
The Commission directed staff to move this petition to Public
Hearing.
Preapplication Review: - Z -89 -08 - Recommendation to City Coun-
cil re: (Discount Auto Parts Store) Rezoning of a .42 -acre parcel
from CG -1 to PUD with CG -1 underlying zoning and site plan ap-
proval for use as an auto parts and accessories store. Located
on the North side of Northlake Blvd., approximately 150' west of
Keating Drive. (13- 42S -42E)
Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, advised that the applicant
has requested this petition be recessed.
19
0
Workshop: AX -89 -02 - Recommendation to City Council re: (North-
lake Centre) Anenxation of 4.648 acres on the south side of
Northlake Boulevard and on the east and west sides of Dania
Drive. (24- 42S -42E)
Preapplication Review: Z -89 -02 - Recommendation to City Council
re: (Northlake Centre) Rezoning of 4.648 acres from Palm Beach
County designation of RM (Multiple- Family Residential District -
Medium Density) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) with underlying
zoning of PO (Professional Office), located on the south side of
Northlake Blvd. and on the east and west sides of Dania Drive.
(24- 42S -42E)
Mr. Bristol Ellington, City Planner, reviewed the Staff Report
dated 7/20/89 and advised that there are still some unresolved
traffic and engineering issues.
Mr. Ornstein expressed concern over the adequacy of the parking
and suggested the medical use be reduced.
Mr. Cory Cross, Authorized Agent for the Petitioner, stated
surveys conducted indicate parking would be adequate.
Mr. Cross advised that the attempt to provide a cross - access
agreement has not been successful.
Mr. Kahart Pinder has been on vacation and has not had an oppor-
tunity to review the traffic situation.
The Commission expressed concern with the bank drive -thru bypass
lane that was requested at the previous meeting, since a teller
booth was also added. The Commission requested that the
teller booth be eliminated to provide for bypass only. The
Commission also requested the location of the ATM be noted on the
site plan.
A discussion ensued regarding traffic concerns.
0
20
r
Mr. Ornstein stated he does not like the color,proposed for the
roof. Mr. Cross advised that the color shown is not the exact
color proposed. Mr. Ornstein requested an accurate color sample
of the roof be provided at the next meeting.
The Commission directed staff to schedule the Public Hearing for
8/22/89, and another Workshop for 8/8/89.
There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was
adjourned at 1:30 A.M. The next Regular meeting of the Planning
and Zoning Commission will be held Tuesday, August 8, 1989.
A Special Meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission will be
held on Auhust 1, 1989, at P.M. jat the ommunity Center.
r
'•�
• , ,I�
WAN
CK LIOC
- - - - - -- - -- -- - - - - --
JEAN LO , S RETARY
7MII�ROSE
NER
21