HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda P&Z 061212,•�
<, y
* * '
�1^ ,�
�� ��
AGENDA
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
TUESDAY, JUNE 12, 2012 AT 6:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
• CALL TO ORDER
• PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
• ROLL CALL
• ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, MODIFICATIONS
• REPORT BY THE DEVELOPMENT COMPLIANCE & ZONING MANAGER:
BAHAREH WOLFS
• APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 04/10/2012
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
Regular Members:
Michael Panczak
Randolph Hansen
Joy Hecht
Roma Josephs
Douglas Pennell
Charles Hathaway
Howard Rosenkranz
Alternates:
Robert Savel (lsr Alt.)
1. Recommendation to City Council (Public Hearing) - QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING
MISC-12-04-000084 Gosman Parcel
A reguest from Downtown at the Gardens Associates, LTD and IMI Kyoto Gardens I LLC
to extend the temporary parking use on the Gosman property for a period of three (3) years.
The Gosman property is located at the southeast corner of Kyoto Gardens Drive and
Alternate AlA within the Regional Center Development of Regional Impact (DRI).
Project Manager: Kathryn DeWitt, Senior Planner, kdewitt a�bgfl.com
Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board
June 12, 2012
2. Recommendation to City Council (Public Hearing) - QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING
PUDA-I2-OS-000038: Midtown Planned Unit Development Amendment
Mainstreet at Midtown, LP and Palm Beach Community Church, Inc. are requesting to
modify the approved signage package for the Midtown Planned Unit Development (PUD).
The modifications include the addition of a new monument sign, addition of tenants to the
existing monument signs, and a waiver to allow a changeable copy sign.
Project Manager. Kathryn DeWitt, Senior Planner, kdewitt��b�flcom
3. Recommendation to City Council (Public Hearing) - QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING
PCDA-12-04-000014: Evergrene Planned Community Development (PCD)
Amendment
A request by the Evergrene Master Association, Inc., for an amendment to the Evergrene
Planned Community Development (PCD) to approve a waiver from Section 78-316 (j),
Minimum Separation, for Parcels 1, 2, 6, 7, and 8. The Evergrene PCD is located at the
southeast corner of Donald Ross Road and North Military Trail.
Project Manager: Tamashbeen Rahman, Planner, trahman(c�pb�fl.com
4. OLD BUSINESS
5. NEW BUSINESS
6. ADJOURNMENT
In accordance with the Americans with Dasabilities Act and Flor^ida Statute 286.26, persons with ctisabilities needing special accommodations to
participate in this proceecling should contact the City Clerk's OfJi�ce, no later than five days prior to the pr�oceeding, at telephone number (561)
799-4120,for asszstance; if lzearin�g impaired, telephone the Florida Reday Service Numbers (800) 955-8771 (TDD) or (800) 955-8770 (VOICE),
for assistance. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Plannzng, Zonirzg and Appeals Board, Local Plannzng t�geney, or Land
Development Regulations Commission, with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, they will need a record of the
proceedings; and for such, they may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal zs to be based. Exact [ega[ description and/or survey for the cases may be obtained from the files in the Growth
Mmzagement Department.
g: Ip&z shareladministrationlpzab agendalp & z agenda 20121pzab 04.10.20121pzab agenda 06.12.2012 word format.docx
2
1 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
2 PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
3 REGULAR MEETING
4 Apri110, 2012
5 I. CALL TO ORDER
6 The regular meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Chair Panczak.
7 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
8 III. ROLL CALL
9 Members Present:
�o Chair Michael Panczak, Vice Chair Randolph Hansen, Joy Hecht, Roma Josephs, Douglas
11 Pennell, Charles Hathaway, Howard Rosenkranz.
t2 Members Absent: None.
13 Also Present: City Attorney, R Max Lohman; Development Compliance and Zoning Manager,
t4 Bahareh Wolfs.
15 IV. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, MODIFICATIONS
16 1. Modification: Development Compliance and Zoning Manager, Bahareh Wolfs requested
17 reordering the agenda, specifically under Public Hearings, number 4 will become number 1,
18 number 1 will become number 2, number 2 will become number 3 and number 3 will become
19 number 4.
2o Vice Chair Hansen made a motion to approve the modification.
21 Board Member Hathawav seconded.
22 Motion passed 7-0.
23 V. REPORT BY DEVELOPMENT COMPLIANCE AND ZONING MANAGER:
24 BAHAREH WOLFS.
25 Development Compliance and Zonin� Manager, Bahareh Wolfs announced that Director of
26 Planning and Zonin�, Natalie Crowley, gave birth to a daughter, Abigale Maylin� Crowlev
27 on Thursday, April 5, 2012.
28 VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
29 Vice Chair Hansen made a motion to approve the February 21, 2012 and March 6, 2012
30 minutes.
31 Board Member Pennell seconded.
32 Motion passed 7-0.
33 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
34 Those preparing to give testimony were sworn in.
35 1. Recommendation to City Council (Public Hearin�) CPTA-12-02-000022: Text
36 Amendment to the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) A City-initiated request for the
3� adoption of amendments to the Capital Improvements Element (CIE) of the City of Palm Beach
38 Gardens Comprehensive Plan to update the CIE to be consistent with the current City budget in
39 accordance with Chapter 163.3177, Florida Statutes.
40 Chair Panczak opened the public hearing.
41 Petitioner: None.
42 Staff Presentation: Principal Planner, Richard Marrero.
43 Public comment: None.
44 Chair Panczak closed the public hearing.
45 Board Member Howard Rosenkranz made a motion to approve CPTA-12-02-000022.
46 Vice Chair Hansen seconded.
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING Page 1
04-10-12
1 Motion passed 7-0.
2 2. Recommendation to City Council (Public Hearing) - QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING
3 PPUD-11-08-000025 and CUMJ-12-01-000022: The Mandel Jewish Communitv Center
4 (JCC)/Arthur I. Meyer Jewish Academy Planned Unit Development (PUD) A request by the
5 Jewish Community Center of the Greater Palm Beaches Inc. for approval of a rezoning of one (1)
6 parcel of land comprising 13.6 acres from Planned Development Area (PDA) to Planned Unit
7 Development (PUD) Overlay with underlying zoning of Mixed Use (MXD) located at the northwest
8 corner of I-95 and Hood Road. The applicant is requesting approval of a 54,403-square-foot
9 community center and approval of a major conditional use to allow a 500-student private school and
� o a 192-student daycare within the PUD.
11 Chair Panczak opened the public hearing.
12 Petitioner: Ryan Johnston, Johnston Group.
13 Staff Presentation: Principal Planner, Richard Marrero.
t4 Public comment: None.
15 Chair Panczak closed the public hearing.
16 Board Member Pennell made a motion to approve PPUD-11-08-000025.
17 Board Member Hecht seconded.
18 Motion passed 7-0.
19 Board Member Pennell made a motion to approve CUMJ-12-01-000022.
20 Board Member Hecht seconded.
21 Motion passed 7-0.
22 Board Member Hathaway left the meeting at 6:55 p.m. and Alternate Member Savel sat in
23 for him the remainder of the meeting.
24 3. Recommendation to City Council (Public Hearing) - QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING
25 SPLA-12-02-000030: Downtown at the Gardens Site Plan Amendment A request by
26 Downtown at the Gardens Associates Ltd. far approval of a site plan amendment to allow the
27 construction of a"Gateway Sign" adjacent to the Yard House restaurant. Downtown at the Gardens
28 is located north of Kyoto Gardens Drive, east of Alternate AlA, south of Gardens Parkway, and
29 west of the Landmark and Gardens Pointe Developments.
3o Chair Panczak opened the public hearing.
31 Petitioner: Donald Hearing, Cotleur & Hearing.
32 Staff Presentation: Principal Planner, Richard Marrero.
33 Public Comment: None.
34 Chair Panczak closed the public hearing.
35 Board Member Howard Rosenkranz made a motion to approve SPLA-12-02-000030.
36 Board Member Josephs seconded.
3� Motion passed 4-3 with Board Member Hecht, Board Member Pennell, Vice Chair Hansen
38 voting against.
39 4. Recommendation to Citv Council (Public Hearing) LDRA-12-03-000044: A City-
4o Initiated Amendment to the Land Development Regulations A City-initiated text amendment
41 to the Land Development Regulations in order to amend and clarify Section 78-221, PGA Overlay
42 pertaining to permitted and prohibited uses.
43 Chair Panczak opened the public hearing.
44 Petitioner: None.
45 Staff Presentaion: Principal Planner, Richard Marrero.
46 Public comment: None.
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING Page 2
04-10-12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Chair Panczak closed the public hearing.
Vice Chair Hansen made a motion to approve LDRA-12-03-000044.
Board Member Pennell seconded.
Motion passed 7-0.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
None.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
None.
(The remainde� of this page intentionally left blank.)
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING
04-10-12
Page 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
X. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Panczak called for adjournment at 7:40 p.m. without motion.
The next regular meeting will be held on May 8, 2012.
Approved•
Michael Panczak, Chair
Randolph Hansen, Vice Chair
Joy Hecht
Roma Josephs
Douglas Pennell
Charles Hathaway
Howard Rosenkranz
ATTEST:
Donna L. Kramer
Municipal Services Coordinator
Note: these minutes are prepared in compliance with 286.011 F.S. and are not verbatim transcripts
of the meeting.
All reference attachments are on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
Note: all those preparing to give testimony were sworn in.
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING
04-10-12
Page 4
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Meeting Date: June 12, 2012
Petition: MISC-12-04-000084
Subject/Agenda Item:
MISC-12-04-000084 Gosman Parcel
Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council: A request from Downtown at the
Gardens Associates, LTD and IMI Kyoto Gardens I LLC to extend the temporary parking use
on the Gosman property for a period of three (3) years. The Gosman property is located at
the southeast corner of Kyoto Gardens Drive and Alternate A1A within the Regional Center
Development of Regional Impact (DRI).
[ ] Recommendation to APPROVE
[X] Recommendation to DENY
Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Finance: PZAB Action:
Director of Planning & Planning & Zoning: Accountant [] Rec. Approval
Zoning Project Manager ' [] Rec. Approved w/
� � ��`� Conditions
_, � ;' � ; , �' ,
Natalie M. Crowley, AICP �+ Sarah Varga �] Rec. Denial
Kathryn DeWitt, AICP [] Continued to:
Sr. Planner
Fees Paid: N/A
Development Compliance
[X] Quasi — Judicial Funding Source:
,,,Bahareh Wolfs, AICP [ ] Legislative
[X] Public Hearing � ] Operating
City Attorney X Other N/A Attachments:
Advertised: � �
[X] Required
• Development
[] Not Required Budget Acct.#: Application
R. Max Lohman, Esq. pa er: Palm Beach N/A �
p Project Narrative
Post
Approved By: Date: 06/01/12 Contract/Aqreement: . Location Map
City Manager Effective Date: • Approved Site Plan
Affected parties: N/A
• Resolution 66, 2007
Ronald M. Ferris [X] Notified
[] Not Required Expiration Date: . Resolution 58, 2009
N/A
• Resolution 27, 2010
Meeting Date: June 12, 2012
MISC-12-04-000084
Page 2 of 4
BACKGROUND
On June 21, 2007, the City Council approved Resolution 66, 2007 permitting Downtown at
the Gardens (DTAG) to temporarily use the Gosman property for valet and employee parking
purposes while the fourth floor of the parking garage was being constructed. A three-(3) year
time period was established in which the off-site parking could be used by DTAG. The use of
the Gosman site was to cease on June 21, 2010.
On September 24, 2009, the City Council approved Resolution 58, 2009, approving
modifications to the center's parking calculations. This Resolution replaced the previously
approved shared parking study with parking regulations from City Code. Additionally, the
Resolution reiterated the June 21, 2010 expiration date related to the temporary parking use.
On June 2, 2010, the City Council approved Resolution 27, 2010 extending the expiration
date of the temporary parking use until December 21, 2011. The condition allowed the
Growth Management Administrator to approve one (1) six-(6) month extension to the
expiration date. This six-(6) month extension was approved on January 13, 2012. Per this
extension, the expiration date is now June 21, 2012.
The subject petition is a request to extend the temporary valet and employee parking use for
three (3) years, until June 21, 2015.
LAND USE & ZONING
The subject site has a Professional Office (PO) future land-use designation and has a zoning
designation of Planned Community Development (PCD) Overlay. The site is also located
within the Regional Center Development of Regional Impact (DRI)
Table 1. Existing Zoning Land Use Designations
• � o
Subiect Propertv DRI / PCD with approved
Gosman property Master Plan PO
North
Downtown at the Gardens DRI / PCD with approved PO
Master Plan
South
Legacy Place PCD Mixed Use (MXD)
West PCD / Research and Light
PGA Corporate Center Industrial (M1A) Industrial (I)
East DRI / PCD / Planned Unit
Financial Center at the Gardens Development (PUD) with PO
approved Master Plan
Meeting Date: June 12, 2012
MISC-12-04-000084
Page 3 of 4
CONCURRENCY
The subject petition does not propose any modifications to the existing concurrency
approvals.
PROJECT DETAILS
Site Details
The Gosman property is approximately 6.59 acres in size and is currently vacant. The site
has a temporary parking lot and temporary lighting for the temporary valet and employee
parking use (see attached Approved Site Plan). The site has access from Lake Victoria
Gardens Avenue and Kyoto Gardens Drive (see Location Map).
Subiect Request
The Applicant proposes to amend Resolution 27, 2010 to allow for the continued use of the
Gosman property by DTAG for temporary parking for a period of three (3) years, until June
21, 2015. The Applicant would continue to utilize the property for valet and employee
parking. The following modifications to Condition No. 1 of Resolution 27, 2010 are proposed
by the Applicant:
"Downtown at the Gardens Associates, LTD. and IMI Kyoto Gardens I LLC is hereby
permitted to temporarily utilize the Gosman property, for valet and employee parking only,
until �B���e�-2���9-1� June 21, 2015 for the patrons and employees of Downtown at the
Gardens. One six (6) month extension may be approved by the Growth Management
Administrator, or designee, so long as Downtown at the Gardens Associates, LTD. and IMI
Kyoto Gardens I LLC submits the request in writing prior to n,T� h,-,�z�z� June 21,
2015. The temporary approval for use of the Gosman property for valet and employee
parking as set forth hereinabove is specific to Downtown at the Gardens Associates, LTD.
and IMI Kyoto Gardens I LLC and shall not be transferred, sold or assigned in any manner
whatsoever. Sale or transfer of any ownership interest in Downtown at the Gardens shall
automatically render this approval null and void. (Planning and Zoning)"
Waiver Requests
No waivers are being requested with the subject petition.
Staff Analysis
The Gosman property was initially permitted to be utilized by DTAG temporarily for ofF-site
parking to alleviate potential parking issues on the DTAG site due to the construction of the
parking garage addition. While the fourth floor of the garage was being built in 2007, parking
spaces within the construction area were not available to be utilized by patrons. Therefore,
the overall number of spaces on the site was reduced. The use of the off-site parking lot
enabled DTAG to continue their day-to-day operations while construction was in process.
Staff supported an extension to this temporary use in 2010, to provide the Applicant time to
develop a more comprehensive and permanent solution to the parking issues occurring on
the site. At this time, the Applicant has submitted a parking study, currently being reviewed
under a separate petition, to allow more office uses on the site, which will decrease their PM
peak-hour trips, when the majority of their parking issues are occurring. This petition is the
Meeting Date: June 12, 2012
MISC-12-04-000084
Page 4 of 4
Applicant's first attempt to develop a permanent parking solution.
Section 78-343(a), Location of required parking, requires parking facilities to be located on
the same lot as the principal use. The temporary parking lot is not part of the DTAG site and
is, not permitted to be used by DTAG. Allowing an off-site parking lot would set a precedent
for other projects within the City to make similar requests.
Staff also has safety concerns with regard to the location of the parking lot. The temporary
parking lot is located south of the DTAG parcel. The two (2) sites are separated by Kyoto
Gardens Drive, a four-(4) lane road. The valet workers continually have to run across Kyoto
Gardens Drive when dropping off and retrieving cars from the Gosman property. This puts
these workers in a very dangerous position. Furthermore, the valet operates largely at night,
increasing the possibility of traffic accidents.
Lastly, the Applicant's request to approve another extension to the Gosman site is not only
inconsistent with the original intent of the parking agreement, but further delays the Applicant
from addressing the poor distribution of parking on the DTAG site. The Gosman site is used
to park cars from the south valet. The south valet is the most highly frequented portion of the
DTAG site; however, the majority of the available parking spaces on site are located at the
north end of the property. Staff has continued to express its position that any parking spaces
added to the DTAG site in the future need to be located at the south end of the property.
The Applicant is requesting the extension based solely on convenience in the operation of the
valet service. As previously stated, the use of the Gosman site was never intended to help
make the valet service more convenient. It was always intended to assist DTAG maintain
day-to-day operations while the garage expansion was occurring. Now that the expansion is
complete and the Applicant is working towards a long-term solution to the parking concerns
on the site, there is no further justification for an extension. For these reasons, staff is not
supportive of the requested extension.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC)
All outstanding comments reviewed from the Development Review Committee (DRC) have
been satisfied.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends DENIAL of petition MISC-12-04-000084.
CITY OF PAI,M BEACH GA�2D ��?�S
DEVEL�OPM�NT APP�,ICA'�ION
�l��n�ng .an�i �o�i�� �iv�sion
Gr�vvth Marageru�nt Depart�erEi
CITY OF PALM BEtiCH GARDEI�TS
1D500 North Nli�itary Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
(561) 759-4243 Fax (561) 799-4281
�Zequest:
OPlanned Community Devzlopment (PCD)
aPlanned Unit Development (PUD)
aAmendment ±o PCD, PUD or Site Plan
aConditional Use
�Amendment.to the Comprehensive Plan
Administrative Approval
❑Administrative Appeal
Project Name: Downtown at the Garders
Owner: �MI Kyoto G�rdens I LLC
Plan Review
currency Certificate
;, Extension
J
Date Submitted: - �D ° I �..
Applicant (if not Owner): Downtown at the Gardens Associates Ltd
Applicant's Address: 5410 Edson Ln Suite 220
Agent: Cotleur & Hearing, Inc.
Telephone No. 30.1-816-1555
Contact Person: Don HearinalAlessandria Kalfin E-Mail: AKalfin@Cotleur-Hearing.com
Agent's Mailing Address: 1934 Commerce Lane, Suite 1, Jupiter, FL 33458
Agent's Telephone Number: 561-747-5336 x 128
Petitian Nu�ber:
Fees Received
Application $ _
Receipt N�i:mber:
FOR OFFICE USE �NLY
Date & Time Received:
Engir_eering w
1
�,_:
6�'�1�,:a�
�-�,, ��
�t�,/ ��_�
' ""4 ``� N�1\N� &
�� ; .,r1�t�C' ;
Architect: N��
Michael B. Schocah ar.d Associates
Engi�eer:
Cctleur & He�riny, inc.
Planner:
Cotleur & Hearing, Inc.
Landseape Architect:
Siie Infor�natio�: Note: Petitioners sha�l submit electronic digital ilies of
apgroved prQjects. See a�tachment f�r details.
Southeast corner of Kyoto Gardens �7rive and Alterr.ate A1A
General Location:
PGA B1vd
� ��rneo•
1 ivauvuu.
Section: 06 Township: 42
52-43-42-06-00-000-3080
Property Control Number�s):
5.36 PCD in DRI
Acreage: Current �oning:
43
Range: _
Requested Zoning: N/A
Flood Zone B Base rlood Elevation (BFE) — to be indicated on site plan
C!PO
Cu�-rent Comprenensive Plan Land Use Designation:
Temporary Parking Lot Temporary Parking Lot.
Existing -Land TJse: �equested Land Use:
Proposed Use(s j i.e. hotel, single family residence, etc.: N/A
Proposed Square Footage by Use: N/A
Proposed Number and Type of Dwelling Unit(s) i.e. single family, multifamily, etc. (if applicable):
N/R
Just�fication
2
In�ormation concerning all realuests (attach additional sheets if needed.)
{Section 78-46, Applica�i�n Procedu:�s, Land Development Regulations}
1. Ex�iQi� the natu.Ye r�f tl�e rEquest:
Do�vntov✓n at the Gardens wculd like to exter�d th� operation af the temporary parking I�t
on the Garders Corporate Center parce! (f.k.a. Gosman) to in ord�r to provide parking for
their valet service as permitted by Resalution 27, 2010 for a three- year period until December 21, 2015.
2. What will be the impact of the proposed change on the surrounding area? _
There is no proposed change to the site. The parking lot is existing.
3. Describe kow the rezoning request complies with the City's Vis:on Plan and the following elements
of tLe City's Comprehensive Plan — Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, I�frastructure, Coastal
Management, Conservation, Recreation and Open space, Intergovernmental Coordination and Capital
Improvement.
Not applicable.
4. How does the proposed project comply with City requirements for preservaiion of natural rESOUrces
and na�ive vegetation (Section 78-301, Land Beveloprnent Regulations}?
Not applicable.
s. How v�r?�l the pro�osed project ca�p?y with City requir�rr�en*•_s for � iL Public Place� (Chapte� 7�-
2b1, Land L'evzlopment Regu?atio�s)?
{�ot appiicable. �
6. Has project received concurrency certification?
Yes
Date received: �003
Legal Desc�iption of the S�biect Prop�rtv
(Attach additional sheets if needed)
Or see attached deed for legal description.
Location
The subj�ct propeYty is located approximately � �nile(s) from the 'vntersection of
Kyoto Gardens Dr & Alt. A1A � on the❑uorth�ast�outh��est side of _
Alternate A1 A (street/road).
Statement of Ownership and Designa�ion of Au�horized Agent
Before me, �he undersigne� autkority, personally appeared ��chard Kobe
who, being by me first duly sworn, on oath deposed and says:
0
�
l. That he,�she is the fee sirnple title owner oi the property described in the attached
Legal Description,
Miscelianeous Petition
2. Tnat he/she i� requesting
City cf Palm_Beach Gardens, Florida.
3. That he/she has appointed Gatleur & Hearing, Ine.
�u *�e
to act
as authorized agent on lus/her behalf to accomplish the above project.
,
rrame of owner. �MI Kyo$o GardenS 1 LLC �� �:.�� .`��`��u �,��� �-���--
���,r�1 ��p �1,�� ��' � Richard Kobe x ;�,_, , .,,;; �..;,,;�
�7 I'�["°"`...a .. _.. . i`��\i..-���� L,�"ec'a�'T,�-,a1.�. f�+.i% `i 1 JtnJlt..�1 =r\e� :
Signature af Owner `�' By: Name/Title c 4µ� "-�'�:"�a^c�`��.��'C�
5750 Old Orchard Rd, Ste 400 Skokie, IL 60077 1461.
Street Address City, State, Zip Code
P. O. Box
847-966-9600
Telephone Number
rkobe@miller-capital.com
E-mail Address
City, State, Zip Code
$47-966-9628
Fax Number
Swom and subscribed before me t�is �� �day of o (�I °�� 1 � •
�
�
;:
ota P�} l�c
My Commission expires:
io l a 31 �s
C�FICIAL SEAL
fi�ARY A �O�NL�f�
N4'iARY PU9LlC - ST,�TE 4F ILLIPIOIS
�AY C�rNiISSIO�I EXPiF�S:t0J�3t96
5 �. •
_ . � . �,�•� ..
Applicant's Certification
I/V�%e affirm and certify that Uwe un�erstand and will comply with the land development regulations of
the City of Pa'� Beach Gardens, Florida. I We further certify that the statements or diagrams made on
any paper or plans submitted here �ith are true to tnP bzst of my/o�r kno��Iedge aud belief. F,�rther,
Uwe ux��erstand t�at this applicaiion, attacl�men±s, an� applica�ian f�ling fees �ecome � part of t�e
offic�al reeords ofthe City cf �alm Beach Gardens, Florida, and are not retursable.
Applicant is:
Owner
�; Optionee
Lessee
� Agent
� Contract Purchaser
va �
:.a� � _
_ �,_s,�
f
Signatu� ec� Applicar.t '
Alessanc+ria Kalfir - Cotleur & Nearing Inc.
Print Name of Applicant
1934 COMMERCE LANE, SUITE 1
StrPP� As1d r�s�
JUPITER, FL 33458
City, State,Zip Code
561.747.6336 x 109
Tele�honeNumber
561.747.1377
F ax N umber
akalfin@cotleur-hearing.com
E-Mail Address
�
3�° t �.,';
i�l�
��=f�
�-;
r-� - �rF�'4
:-�4t-',
Palm Beach Gardens Growth Managemenf Department
10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
561-799-4230
Permit
Financial Re�ponsit��liiv Fcrm
i'he ow�er understands that all City-incurred pro#essional fees and expenses assoc�ated with the
processing of this appiication request are ultimaiely the respcnsibility af the owner. A security
deposit shall be,deposited in an interest-bearing account with any accrued interest to be retained by the
---- - --------- ----
--.. _.._._.. . _... _ . --- - --
� "-- � Cify of Palm Beach-Gardens.
Tne owner and/or designee shall be invoicPd on a monthly basis for professional fees such as, but not
limited to, cansultant engireering services, legal services, adv�rtising costs, and/or any other cosis
aitributable fo the processing af the permit for which the City incurred during the previous monfh. The
owner and/or designes shall reimburse the City with�n thirty (30) days from date of invoice. If payment is
nbt received, the Ci'ry may utilize the security deposit for re-imbursement purposes. All activiiies related
to the pending permit(s) wil{ cease until a.ny outstandir�g invoices are paid.
'�he owner/designee further understands that transfer cf ihis r�sponsibil;ty shall require a
completed form, signed and notarized by the responsible party, and delivered to the City Growth
Management Departmen� if the name and/or address of the responsible party changes at anytime
during the application review process.
�`�_�-a� - �:.�-��--j------ �� t' � ��`1 i
Ow..n.e�e�r� signa.tvu��rae� /'(� ��q �" r-� t�. '�'Fl�j�/�+.��,�-y-',+r+ ��y,�a:.�n�1y,�, ���r��^Dafe '
.�-� �' t.�v Y"w.,� a..�' l� \'�ft�'a.sS �� T-. �� 4�� 1' I v i`-' ��� V'+' �l' V J R'ti'
Richard Kobe �"� ,"°�"j 52-43-42-06-00-000-3080
Owner prinfed r,ame
CIESIGNEE/BILL T0:
Downtown at the Gardens Associates LTD
5410 EDSON LN 5TE 220
ftOCKVILLE, MD 2G852 3195
STATE OF
COUNTY OF
Property Control Number
Designee Accepfance Signature
NOTAR`r C�CKNOWL�DGEMENT
I hereby certify that the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of
, 20_, by . He or she is personally known
to me or has prod�ced as identification.
Notary public signature
Prinfed name
State of __ at-lar�e � My Commission exp�res:
Cotleur&
�Iearin
g
Landscape Architects I Land Planners i Environmentai Consultants
1934 Commerce Lane • Suite 1� Jupiter, Florida • 33458 • Ph 561.747.6336 • Fax 561.747.1377 • www.cotleurhearing.com • Lic # LC-0000239
Gardens Corporate Center
(a.k.a. Gosman Property)
Temporary Parking
Miscellaneous Petition
Introduction
Downtown at the Gardens Associates, LTD. (applicant) and IMI Kyoto Gardens I LLC (property
owner) are jointly seeking approval from the City to amend Resolution 27, 2010 to permit an
extension of temporary parking for the Downtown valet operator on the Gosman property. The
temporary parking use approval will expire on May 21, 2012 after a six month extension, and
the applicant would like to continue using the parking in this location, despite the fact that it is
not required for the Downtown at the Gardens project by code any longer. Keeping the
temporary parking use will assist Downtown at the Gardens to provide valet in a conveniently
located area to maximize the parking opportunities for patrons and to limit their wait time.
Specific Requests and Fees
Miscellaneous Petition (Base Fee) $1,650.00
Le�al Escrow Fee $1,000.00
Total Fees $2,650.00
Project Contacts
Applicant
Downtown at the Gardens Associates, LTD
5410 Edson Ln Suite 220
Rockville, MD 20852
Phone: 301-520-3900
Fax: 301-816-1556
Email: KBerman@Bermanenterprises.com
Agent/Planner
Cotleur & Hearing Inc.
1934 Commerce Lane, Suite 1
Jupiter, FL 33458
Phone: 561-747-6336 x128
Fax: 561-747-1377
Email: Akalfin@Cotleur-Hearing.com
Property Owner
IIVII Kyoto Gardens I LLC
5750 Old Orchard Rd, Ste 400
Skokie, IL 60077 1061
Phone: 847-966-9600
Fax: 847-966-9628
rkobe@miller-capital.com
�a�� 1��'� ��::
� �'��M��I
-.�,
h�'��
��� �; �',
Gardens Corporate Center
Temporary Parking Lot
Miscellaneous Petition
CH# 00-1003.04
March 30, 2012
Background
The temporary parking lot solution was approved by City Council in June 2007 by way of
Resolution 66, 2007. Condition five (5) of the Term Sheet required that an application for a
minimum of 160 parking spaces for valet and employee parking on the Gosman property be
submitted by June 27 2007. The application was approved as an administrative amendment in
September 2007, permits were issued and the parking lot was built expeditiously per the
condition of approval. Since that time, the temporary parking lot has been used to relieve
parking when the center was at its busiest. Downtown has also submitted and been approved
for a long term parking plan solution. The condition permitted the use of the Gosman property
for parking for a maximum of three (3) years from the date the Term Sheet was approved; June
21 2007.
In 2010 the applicant filed for an amendment to Resolution 66 2007 to modify a certain
condition of approval related to temporary parking located on the Gosman property. The
amendment was approved by way of Resolution 27 2010 and permitted the temporary parking
to remain in place until December 21, 2011 unless an extension was filed. An extension was
filed prior to December 21, 2011 requesting an additional six months of use. The extension
request was approved and the temporary parking on the Gosman property is valid until June
21, 2012.
Request
The applicant proposes to amend Resolution 27 2010 to allow for the continued use of
temporary parking on the Gosman property by the Downtown at the Gardens valet operator.
The applicant proposes to modify condition one (1) of Resolution 27, 2010. The condition is
proposed as follows:
Downtown at the Gardens Associates, LTD. And IMI Kyoto Gardens 1 LLC is hereby permitted to
temporarily utilize the Gosman property, for valet and employee parking only, until June
"°^��� 21, 2014 �A-1� for the patrons and employees of Downtown at the Gardens. One six
(6) month extension may be approved by the Growth Management Administrator, or designee,
so long as Downtown at the Gardens Associates, LTD. And IMI Kyoto Gardens 1 LLC submit the
request in writing prior to June ��� 21, 2014 ��. The temporary approval for use of the
Gosman property for valet and employee parking as set forth herein above is specific to
Downtown at the Gardens Associates, LTD. and IMI Kyoto Gardens 1 LLC and shall not be
transferred, sold or assigned in any manner whatsoever. Sale or transfer of any ownership
interest in Downtown at the Gardens shall automatically render this approval null and void.
The applicant is not proposing to modify the site plan from the original approval; a copy has
been included herein. The request is to extend the use of the property for temporary parking
use for valet service and employees only. The parking in the lot is not required for the
Downtown at the Gardens site plan.
�
Gardens Corporate Center
Temporary Parking Lot
Miscellaneous Petition
CH# 00-1003.04
March 30, 2012
The Applicant is requesting a three-vear extension of the temporary parking lot on the Gosman
property directly adjacent to the south end of the Downtown at the Gardens center. The
temporary parking lot does not account as part of the required parking for powntown.
However, keeping the temporary parking available for the valet operator will allow for
conveniently located valet parking in a safe and convenient off-site location that decreases the
patron wait times drastically.
As mentioned, the temporary parking lot is not required for any use on our site or on the
Downtown at the Gardens site and is ancillary in nature. Downtown uses the parking area for
valet service provided, complimentary, to the patrons at their center. This parking is not
required for their center however it does provide for a higher level of service to the patrons.
They only use the parking in this temporary lot to shorten the retrieval time for people who
drop their cars off at the south valet for the overall goal of improving their guest experience. It
should be noted that during a recent parking study at Downtown it is has been determined that
the number of parking spaces provided on site is above and beyond the daily demand at peak
hours of the day. Based on this justification we believe the temporary parking lot should be
extended.
The existing paver crosswalk provides a safe and direct route across Kyoto Gardens Drive for
the valet, while maximizing parking in close proximity to each tenant for patrons. The
temporary lot has alleviated the patron waiting times for valet pick up. The temporary parking
has demonstrated to be a great asset for powntown and their valet service to enhance the
customer experience.
Conclusion
This applicant is proposing to extend the approval for the temporary parking on the Gosman
property to be used by Downtown the valet operator exclusively. All requested
changes/refinements are consistent with the Regional Center DRI Development Order, the City
Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan of Palm Beach Gardens. The
Applicant is looking forward to working closely with staff throughout the review process.
3
Location Map
�
,-i
r-1
� 0
� z
�
O
�_
Qo
J
a
� i �
I �
I_ 1 I
�
I I I
I I
��
\
�
\
\
��\ � �
_'�\\ \ �
\
�
� i ` �T�Y�yj�� 7 � ;
/� � I �ao w � e' / �y . . �
� /� � `f.��`r� \\
i II��!';`�2�i�� /� `����+s.\
I � �� — � i % �
��� , ; �' ; j ; � �. �
JI� �I I �netr�� 4�; ' �, ,
1 I I � �, ane ��.�
I I I Irl �0� �a �
I I I � I i-6•
I I n3� I aa• un
I I I
, I ss wrosc� �[ I i_
w
FASd1EM � VROPOg06' I I
�, � . � uriKr�n� II �. I
I I� I�
• I mnm wu�� �� II
i 1
I l,
�
I
I �
� I
I �
I �
I I
' I
I
� I
�
I �
I� I
� I�
VI
I �
I
I I I
�
�
�� �
,,
�;- �� � � � ��
, � �
� i i ��, �.�
� i
i ji i
f I I
I ��[ II
I � �i[ �—
� 'l II
II
� il II
�I II
u�nwnre �V I I I
ss
�uosc�rE
�� I
O �
O �
�� I �
�
�
�
C
E`
�a
��� �
o `� � �
� \.
\nzIa � �
� R1S ' I
0.i �
sasonwr �
�
\ �
��� \ \
oc �
�\� � 9��F�\
5l�ucc� �� SQ�Ql�-I
n� ` \ � v
� � � �
� �
'�(� `�/ • �.���
� a�»
1����_ i � `�� . .
ii o � �
ii � " �
i i ���
I I "'°
; caa�
II �" noexauc
I I R� ��4� sr�x - xa
II a3� ��� � _ +, �W ucvna�
oa ��
� �' �S�*I ,.If i eaa
fl9tli, TP
II PNDIUP ' " B.
GN,TYP.
I I wHeasrav, � �, I , '-:....-�F- .e-
s=c II rn.
-36 18'fi 8'-b' ]b'-klft+ , `� �'
�� �
�� I �
I I SWVERED
�Jr � � $MfLTHI � '•� �.
RIQNG ea+ e�-�• ��`;;: '
�A� a. r
�� S� I � A�
. . SmElVPl1C f � �.,. � " I
'k INOIU76
I I i—Z6'-y i i TRFFSAFECIID
O BY RtOFpSm
kie�c � s�
I I I �MPPOYFMINIS
DOWNTOWN AT
� THE GARDENS
\�
NAIJ( \ \\
\ \
e � �\
T�ee Legend
O PINETREE
� EUGILYPlUS TREE
O PALM TREE
Q l/NKNOWN SP£QES
fl� OAK TREE
(� LiGU57RUMTREE
��
f�n. DATEPALM
t�
�,�
EMSTING SIQLLED
NURSING BUILDING
I`I i � i� II N' _T MqNG' `__ -___ ��
I� �� �� �a�Ol g- P�� LZ..I f""rJ
` I, i I I � � I 93 B 95ICd�,TYP. �
I\ � IY�11 II I I �\HI� B' B � I
�� I �ia i� �� �� i, 10'S. �
I � T'/�i [ � � � � R]D'H0. i ' � . EPSB1 ____ vrn�
y U� ouMarvo II II oa ',�� �: -� � I �
� �i � FuarcR,�^ � � ' � oFyN��"<".-`: .. I� urnnr I �
EqSTNG I \ i� v � � �' •- " PfENT �
uxosrar I �[ I I I I � `�e�' !i—: '�-•..:•�
ewsonerr I � � � � l I I � ' � � c�� � �� "
� � ���a� �;a�� �, �� �� �� "; ��''f ��; _ -
I � `� �K�x�� i��,�� i i I� � # � � � _.
� I�' II ueNr,m. '':
� I � I I I I I I �� \� �•� �'. �
I � ��i I I I I I rnEa '� y� r`; \.-
� � i f� � � � � ��wrun � „f�� .
�I � I \ I I ��,.\ j �\�(` �'1'�'i�•.
� II II ���
� �f � II ����� ` ���iii��'i#�.,
� � � �� � �� ,;, ! ;
li ii ii s��r �;;� �, II'I I
;� ��� �I ausn� �'�� �♦ ' tii�i �
I Sos�n j I \ \ I l� I I rave Exr ��� I I� 11 �i ±�`��/[��� �R \�� � I� r .' EMSTING MEDICAL
eurrn i� .� �`��\�. ���1�14�(Jf'� i OFFICEEJILDMG6
' a � cs - s � � /f��/�I i � PARIQNU GARAGE
I a.°'wune I da ` il-r i -r /°°i"j : � ����� ���`_-;/' "'I� � t�eoir�aae�w.>
I a��'Sa�� �%;
I R95 � R4l5�� � �
%II �. � .
I i I � 3�� Ri0' \ R2\ � \ 3' / !/�v, �I I� ��� _
• I �•
� �i ��
\ / I
� I � a� _ i♦ " i�/// 900 SQ.Ff. Y. ..
. O - -' I� i\�_ oRV aFfExnoN i I I}�: ,
i ________-=i%i �
` ___
i , � `_____________-�. � .:
I � I I � ------- — —_oa _ _ ' . ,-----------' ��
. � �_
` _ _
__________________ _____ - - ___
� L________ _DL._ �
` _ ______�� .��
I I � \ \ \\ W5ILVGLINDSGPE I—�—,
s Zy� rr�aroae
IANOSGPE � !�� �E ��RCWNFlGURFD
I a� u�nnnr ��'� �
0.0.W.LPiE \
�� �
i �������}{.i.iTrl�T��r�'��^4�I���������r���-�1 ,— � �__-----__
\ .� \ �-- __
�
� \� � v O � \\`\� \�����
. � � O �O � � \� \��-----�
� \
�
�� O �❑� � � 5m�,� � � �— -- ; � � - �
�\� � _��� � _ �'�, �� �---��� �=
� ��� -� C:� . 6 � �
' �_� �_ � �
PGA BLVD.
r�r— - _.
� �
� I
�
_"_' � i
� I
�
I �
� I
�� � I I
��
, ��
_.I_;
I Ir i
' ' � II
I I I '
II I
— �� �,
I �
II �I
I I
' I I 1
� �i� � �
� � �
� � I I
� � �
� � � I
�� � �
� � I I
� 11 II
�—u—~- I bQST]NGR�W{ 1
1 ) i :�
IAINr � � O � I
�- � / � i
J (
� �"`� � � � �� I
��
� I
� � I
I
�j0 � � I
—�� � ,, _ � �..
m
�
Uti/ity Legend
� TRAFFfCSIGN
T ANCHOR
• CONO2EIEPoWERPoLE
!V WAiER VALVE
� MANHOLE
� � . FIRE HIDRAM
{i IXI577NG L[GHT POSf
� IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE
.�i GiTGi fl0.5IN
❑ BELL SOUTH JUNCIION BOX
� PROPoSEDL[GHTPOLE
Location Map N�
Site Data
Ga�dens Co�porate Cente!
(a.k.a. Medica/Ma//)
S/TE DATA
TOWNSHIP:42 S. RANGE: 43 E. SECTION: 8
REGIONAL CENTER PARCELS 27.74 AND 27.12
LAND USE DESIGNATION pp
EXISTING ZONING DESIGNATION: pCD/ORl
PBG PETITION NO.: TBD
FEMA FLOOD ZONE: B
TOTAL SITE AREA 8.80 ACRES
PROPOSEDUSES
TEMPORA0.V SURFACE PARKING LOT 3.11 ACRES
PHASING � pW�,SE
TYPEOFOWNERSHIP pRNATE
LAND USE ALLOCATION ��
VEHICUTARUSEAREAS 311
RIGHTS OF WAV � �
SIDEWALKS 0.10
OPENSPACE,BUFFERS 3�
TOTAL SIiE AREA 8.80
OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS ACREB
PERVIOUS
DRAINAGEREfENTION �40
OPENSPACE & BUFFERS Z �
S�BTOTAL 3.38
IMPERVIOl15
VEHICULARIISEAREAS 3��
SIOEWALKS � �Q
SUBTOTAL ��
TOTAL 8.80
PARKING CALCLUATIONS
PROPOSEO USES �aui�
TEMPORAftYPARKING �
SUBTOTAL
LOADING CALCLUATIONS REam�un
17X35'LOA�INGZONES Wq
Pro� ject Team
Owner Surveyor
man�noe.ewpmemCOmpen�es,inn �enaman�su�.ey�y
35�1 PGA 61M. 1650 Forest Hill 91vd.
Suile 2f11 Sulte 100
PelmBeec�GaNens,FL33410 WestPelmBeeM,FL33C08
Conteci:JemesMehrer ConhcLMi�eelSclio�eh
Tel 561-2825000 TeI:5fi1-B6B-0080
Fex:561-2025001 Fac 501-8429"!28
jmehre�manmaevelopm¢ntWm mscM1O�eM1�scha�e�.wm
PERCEM
47.75%
0.00%
1.5/%
5128%
70U.00%
PEACEM
8.06%
4521%
5728%
4].15%
7.5/%
48.00%
700.00%
PROVI�EU
405
405
raohoen
NIA
Lendscape Archi�ect 8 Civll Engineer
Pian�e� MicheelB.SChoreh BAsaodetes,liw.
Catleur8 Hee�ing. Inc. 1 B50 Farest Hill bNd.
1834 Commefw Lene Suile20B
SullaNi W¢stPelmBeeCi,FL33408
Jupibr,FL 33E59 Confact Mertlia Carer
CAnfaci:OOnHeaMg Te1:561-868-008p
Te1:591-]4'/�8338 Fer.561fi42-8]2fi
Fa.: ssiaa�-t3n mmne�srnoren.wm
tlheennp�mtleurfiaeim0��m
�ite P/an
I �- -
Scale: 1" = 50'
North
Cotleur
Hearing
Landscape Arc:hitecture
Planning
Environmental Consulting
Grephic Design
1934 Commerce Lane
Suite 1
Jupiter, Florida 33458
561-747-6336 Fax-747-1377
�
� �
� ♦�
� �
J
/� �
� � �
C
� �
�
� � �
� � �
� O C
� � �
� �
� �
�
�
oesicNeo DEH
oanwrv EP
naaaoveo DEH
J08NUMeER 001003
DATE O6/16/06
kensioNS 07/24/06
FENCE 08/07/06
08/17/06
08/28/O6
August 2B, 2�06 6:1a:06 D�m.
ing: CH-GOSSMAN PARKING-LOT.pWG
SHEET � OF L
m UJyR�.Ey�UR HEARING INC.
M m ts mdrar�md�m��w m��o�yN �en
�,��,a�^�°"m�,� ��„��„
3
1VM1tlR6W _
,�:a��-��'�j���'��°�,i:
... � ' � ��
��„
�,4;7 �
��,
�:
� :� :
E
� _
� _ �:w. �,� ��.:�,�
CUViuLR (I��LYi — ['C1dGit17F#1 . . .
aG �un �4F�,'�ttr+':-�' dv'4 t 1 0. :
M�F1xl1zllPtriaH5Y4iJ'4Yka`ip�Ad�519 (��✓}
"a'M 89�'�I�i't�iUSAK'K' 'yR"' 1 �`itl f�Ml0.- �
eq .+elssefu�v_+3YJ h.J Ey."*.�I�R+ { 3Y
� `j•2s
�'ni )iY�m'� k aEt� l3-. A 4 x'S 0
L 1 ti 4P 4 -- �4
teV ts»Ydik It rtG�l Ye+�W i(.�Wta3: .
A �Gtat.9aFA'�"�. ,a'la+m+'�'Y�E'i,t'�1l
. .. -ramaam�n ` �. �
-. M kl �I�ryAeirt- .�. '�
IPm�"�"� -. .
�. f.R 1l,+� .,.p iJ3T_'
�' ilrtb � �h'a�� � � �
���_' __
�FT3 65W� 5d1C
T&& Vav"C at 4_n. �i
r-'e : —'1 .��� _� �fT
,� � ��a;� .l�:.� ��
T ��' {m:_: ., - H-,.��,,,,.E.
Sench
NTS
�M'e U e.�lM Drn Po��rpm� fiW h A �M
«i�r �
�=='; r"=i �a <.,>>...,� ;��.a� �,
rv w �" �
l� - --� b o�° � ' ��° �
��T— - --o 0 0 6�.,,�.. ,.�,
gSi.__ .-0 o 0 0 �
O O O O��rx�vcareo ao���M �v
Fne b h�a +N'IN �++lM p/3' �at,v Hhwn awr.
rtax vrnr
M :�"�..�,e r'�'� k°"�%,' o ","...'".;i �." �`e �'; m"7M "-,�.' « �<,.
Ct/RB RAMP OETECTABLE WARN/MG DETAlL
Detectab/e Wa�nin� System P/acement
NTS
�
.M.___ _ _ w
um Materia�
brk tacod•t!p
��S
�
���� �„ ��'
�
Shutt/e She/te� Desi,Qn E/e�atian
NTS
pS�PE R�A RE W IREM EI.'�5
0
rwscHUrsioEwnuc
FWSH WfIHASPHALT
�_�
r oucoHu
OWESIRIPE3
PEftFWTINDIX
�
HPN�� �NG6
Standard & Handicap Pa�king Layout
WRH TPICAf. WHEELS70P NTS
��?'.
�.an--_ 1>I-¢2'"i�
�l � 1�`
�"Yy"�»'�`: ,tw� ;,,-a.-,.:
�—y
I/ EI00 FlNE �<
°�I\ FS 318.74 �f�
_____J 1
��
M�Y�Fw.�
w �.�.«, «.,'-na,�
R-�'
i'
�-� �� CONCREfE
36 4� SIDEWALKNP.
N7o• H TYPEF
Note: ' WRBTP
SYMBCLTOBE4"WI�EWHRE HAN�ICAPACCESSRAMP
TRAFFIC PAINT ON PAVEMENT.
2 RAO
PAVEMENT
B'
Type 'D"Curb
NTS
��
i ��
� �
i �
! �
�
j _I �
I
i (d)WHEELSNPS,USEO
' 0.5PLP.TEROIPMCNO
� CIRIXR
� PLAHiERMER
� � � iLOWE0.1NUipEE
/ /
P/ante� Diamond
NTS
�.�'ite Detai/s
o� zs� sa� ioo� uo� zoo�
Scale: 1" = 50'
1��
Cotleur
Hearing
Landscape Architecture
Planning
Environmental ConsulGng
Grephic Design
1934 Commerce Lane
Suite 1
Jupiter, Florida 33458
561-747-6336 Fau-747-1377
�
� �
� \�
V �
J
L.L
� � �
C
� �
�
�O � �
�
��
� U
O � �^'
W
��
Ow �
� ` 1..�
�/ ��\
� �
�
�
OESIGNED DEH
ORAWN �
APPROVED DEH
JOBNUMBER 001003
pp� 06/16/06
REVISIONS 07/24/06
FENCE 08/07/06
08/28/06
Auqust 2fi, 20�6 6:10:06 p.m.
CH-GOSSMAN PARKINC-LOT.DWG
SHEET � OF �
6 fATIEUR HEARING INC.
�m�i..�� ro�m�r ��µ
�.,;�;��.�� ��°°�
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Date Prepared: June 21, 2007
RESOLUTION 66, 2007
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, F�ORIDA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF PA�M BEACH GARDENS AND
DOWNTOWN AT THE GARDENS ASSOCIATES, LTD. RELATED
TO PARKING AT DOWNTOWN AT THE GARDENS; ANQ
PROVIDING AN EFFECTlVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Downtawn at the Gardens Associates, Ltd. ("Developer") wishes to
resolve the various parking issues related to Resolution 91, 2003, as amended by
Resolution 212, 2003, Resolution 120, 2005, and the associated Administrative
Arnendments; and
WHEREAS, the City of Palm Beach Gardens and the Developer wish to enter
into an Agreement to resalve said parking issues; and
WHEREAS, such Agreement has been prepared and is attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed approval of this Resolution to be in the
best interest of the residents and citizens of the City of Palm Beach Gardens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA that:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and ratified.
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby accepts and approves the Agreement
between the City of Palm Beach Gardens and Downtown at the Gardens Associates,
�td., and hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the Agreement.
SECTION 3. This Resolutian shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
�
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Date Prepared: June 21, 2007
Resolution 66, 2007
PASSED AND ADOPTED this a2 � day of ��� , 2007.
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA
:
ATTEST:
BY:
atricia nider, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
BY:
Christine P. Tatum, City Attorney
VOTE:
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR LEVY
COUNCILMEMBER JABLIN
COUNCILMEMBER VALECHE
COUNCILMEMBER BARNETT
/�' `��
Mayor
�
,'
,
�
AYE NAY ABSENT
✓
J
J
�
✓
�
\1Pbg�leWttorney\attorney_sharelRESOLUTIONS\Downtown at the Gardens parking Agmt - reso 66 2007.doc
2
**TERM SHEET**
Pursuant to our meeting earlier today, DOWNTOWN AT THE GARDENS
ASSOCIATES, LTD., ("Downtown"), hereby submits this Term Sheet in an effortto resoive
the various issues in the CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, ("City") relating to Resolution
91, 2003, as amended by Resolution 212, 2003, Resolution 120, 2005, and the
associated Administrative Amendments.
The terms proposed by Downtown are as follows:
1. Downtown agrees to post $5.4 million surety for the additional parking as
defined in the Development Order within seven (7) days of the execution of this
Agreement. Surety shall be posted in the form of a letter of credit acceptable to the City
Attorney. If Downtown fails to construct the required number of additional parking spaces
as provided in the Development Order, then the City shall be entitled to call the Letter of
Credit. If the Letter of Credit is cailed the City shall deposit the proceeds in an interest
bearing escrow account and shall be entitled to utifize the funds for the construction of the
required parking. Any interest which accrues shall be paid to the City. Any unspent
proceeds from the Letter af Credit can onfy be disbursed to Downtown when the required
additional parking has been completed as evidenced by the issuance of a Certificate of
Completion. If Downtown constructs the additional required parking the Letter of Credit
shall be returned to Downtown when the Certificate of Completion is issued. The Letter of
Credit shall be issued bya bank that has an office in either Palm Beach, Broward or Dade
County. Upon posting Surety, the City shall release the Public Improvement Bond and
also reimburse Downtown's cash bond posted for the M2 Parking Lot.
2. Upon receipt of the Letter of Credit, the City will immediately issue building
permits for the Bing Crosby Restaurant, Pizza Girl Restaurant, and Cloud 10 retail store.
In addition, City will continue to issue building permits and occupational licenses to
subsequent tenants within the ordinary course of business.
3. Downtown will contract for and proceed with a 4�' floor expansion of the east
parking garage for approximately 240 parking spaces by August 1, 2007. Once
construction has started, Downtown will continuously pursue construction until completed.
4. Downtown's contractor will, prior to issuance of a building permit, post a
payment and performance bond with City as co-obligee in an amount equal to the certified
cost of the 4�' floar expansion, which bond shall be typical in form of other bonds furnished
to #he City in other projects.
5. Downtown will submit and the Ci#y will process in good faith a revised
application for a minimum of 160 parking spaces for valet and employee parking on the
Gosman property consisting of primarily a gravel base with portable lighting by June 27,
2007 and will start construction within ten (10) days of issuance of all government permits.
Downtown agrees to expeditiously seek these permits. Downtown shall complete
construction of the temporary parking on the Gosman property within 90 days of starting
construction. Downtawn agrees to hold back 38,212 square feet of retail space and 3,655
square feet of office space until completion of the parking lot on the Gosman property.
Upon campletion of canstruction on the Gosman property and commencement of
construction of the 4th flaor parking, Downtown wil! only be required to hold back 12,500
square feet of retail space and 3,655 square feet of office space. Downtown is permitted
to use the Gosman property for parking until such time as the lang term parking plan has
been completed, but in no event for a period of time in excess of three (3) years from the
date of this agreement with further approval of the City Council.
6. Downtown may convert the uses based upon City's parking requirements as
determined by the Growth Management Department, except Downtown agrees that the
total restaurant square footage of Downtown at the Gardens shall not exceed 92,986
square feet at any one time unless approved by the City Council. Any restaurant, retail or
office space that has been previously leased and vacated or any space subsequent{y
leased and vacated will be entitled to be re-leased and occupied by subsequent tenants.
7. The City acknowledges temporary use of the Kolter and Grand Bank
properties for temporary valet and employee parking. Downtown will deliverto Citya copy
of the Use Agreement with Ko{tec and Grand Bank. These agreements wi11 remain in effect
until completion of the Gosman property construction.
8. Downtown will submit on or before August 1, 2007 an application for a long-
term parking solution which will include a significant office building as a component of the
solution. City agrees to use its best efforts ta process the application as expeditiously as
possible.
9. Simultaneously, with the review of the application for the long-term parking
solution referenced in number 8 above, the City will resume processing NQPC11 and will
use it's best efforts ta process the application as expeditiously as possible.
10. The 51 temporary parking spaces recently constructed on the M2 outparcel
will remain as permanent spaces until an approved Site Plan Amendment (contemplated
through the office building component) modifies the requirement.
11. Downtown acknowledges that it will be responsible for its pro-rata share of
the cost of the signalization of the intersection of Lake Victoria Gardens Avenue and Kyoto
Gardens Drive and PGA Boulevard. The signalization shall include all appropriate lane
geometry (as determined by Palm Beach County and the Florida Department of
Transportation}, pavement markings, signage, and lighting. Upon installation of the signal,
Downtawn shall reimburse the City its pro-rata share.
F:\DOCSVwg�Tetm Sheet New.wpd
DOWNTOWN AT THE GARDE�$'ASSOCIATES, LTD.
:
CITY OF PAL�ACH G E
By: -
F:�DOCSVwgiTertn Shect New2.wpd
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
RESOLUTION 58, 2009
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORlDA AMENDING THE SITE PLAIV FOR
DOWNTOWN AT THE GARDENS LOCATED WITHIN THE
REGIONAL CENTER DRI/PCD, AS DESCRIBED flAORE
PARTICULARLY HEREIN, TO MODIFY CERTAIN C4NDITIONS OF
APPROVAL; TO REPLACE THE MOST CURRENT SHARED
PARKING ANALYSIS WITH PARKING REGULATIONS FROM CITY
CODE; TO REVISE THE LAKE AREA STAGE PLAN; TO PROVIDE
A SERVICE AREA SCREENING PLAN; PROVIDING CONDITIONS
OF APPROVAL; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR
OTHER PURPOSES.
WHEREAS, the City Council, as the governing body of the City of Palm Beach
Gardens, Florida, pursuant to the authority in Chapter 163 and Chapter 166, Flarida
Statutes, and the City's Land Development Regulations, is authorized and empowered
to consider petitions related ta zoning and land development orders; and
WHEREAS, the City received petition SPLA-07-08-000007 from Downtown at
the Gardens Associates, LTD., for an amendment to ihe site plan approval for the
Downtown at the Gardens project on the approximately 35-acre site located within the
Regional Center Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and Planned Community
Development (PCD), as more particularly described herein, to replace the most current
shared parking analysis with parking regufations from City code; to revise the lake area
stage plan; and provide a service area screening plan; and
WHEREAS, the subject site is zoned Planned Community District (PCD) Overlay
with an underlying zoning of Commercial and Office; and
WHEREAS, the subject site is part of the Regional Center DRI approved by
Resolution 9, 1984, as amended; and
WHEREAS, the Downtown at the Gardens project was first approved by City
Council on June 5, 2003, by Resolution 91, 2003, which designated the mix and
amount of allowabfe uses and provided for a number of development waivers and
conditions; and
WHEREAS, Resolution 93, 2003 was approved concurren#ly to amend the DRI
allowing the new mix of uses for powntown at the Gardens and revising the conversion
matrix to include an equivalency provision; and
WHEREAS, on May 15, 2003 City Council adopted Resolution 92, 2003, which
approved the lake tract improvement site plan for the lake/park area within the DRI; and
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
WHEREAS, on December 18, 2003, City Council approved
2003 to modify the Downtown at the Gardens site plan by deleting
11,000 square feet, reduce the number of theater seats to 3,130,
regional retail square footage by 1,473 square feet; and
Resolution 58, 2009
Resolution 212,
an unaccounted
and increase the
WHEREAS, on September 29, 2005, Resolution 120, 2005 approved an
amendment to the Downtown at the Gardens site plan and lake improvement plan of
the DRI by modifying certain conditions of approval, deferring some elements of the
lake improvement plan, adding unused remaining DRI entitlements of 1,032 square feet
of office space to the subject site, and providing for other modifications and waivers,
including a waiver to #he screening requirement for the service areas from public view;
and
WHEREAS, on January 10, 2005, an administrative approval revised the number
of cinema seats to 3,020 and reallocated 1,800 square feet of space befinreen two
proposed buildings (M1 and M2); and
WHEREAS, on June 21, 2007, Resolution 66, 2007 approved an agreement
between Downtown at the Gardens Associates, LTD., and the City related to the
Applicant's violation of #he project's Development Order, Resolution 120, 2005, in
regard to parking requirements at Downtown at the Gardens, and provided a term sheet
to the agreement outlining temporary relief to the parking issues while the Applicant
developed a long-range so{ution; and
WHEREAS, the subject site is in violatian of the Development Order
requirements as provided in the term sheet of Resolution 66, 2007, specifically
regarding required parking and the expiration of the $5.4 million surety bond for the
construction of such parking; and
WHEREAS, Downtown at the`� Gardens Associates, LTD., has completed
construction of 240-space expansion #o the existing parking garage, a 50-space surface
parking lot, and other temporary parking arrangements; and
WHEREAS, the proposed site plan amendment would provide adequate parking
for the revised mix of uses as required by City code, would correct other outstanding
issues which remain outstanding as se# forth in Resolution 66, 2007, and would
eliminate the need for the parking bond; and
WHEREAS, the Site Plan Amendment petition was reviewed by the Planning,
Zoning, and Appeals Board on June 9, 2009, which recommended its approval by a
vote of 7-0; and
43 WHEREAS� the City Gouncil has considered the evidence and testimony
44 presented by the Applicant and other interested parties and the recommendations of
45 the various City of Palm Beach Gardens' review agencies and staff; and
46
�
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Resolution 58, 2009
WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed approval of this Resolution to be in the
best interest of the ci#izens and residents of the City of Palm Beach Gardens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA that:
SECTION 1. The Site Plan Amendment petition (SPLA-07-08-OOQ007) from
Downtown at the Gardens Associates, LTD., is hereby APPROVED for the Downtown at
the Gardens project, located on a 35-acre site, more or less, within the Regional Center
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and Planned Community Development (PCD),
as more particularly described herein, in order to modify certain conditions of approval;
to reallocate the mix of uses allowed within the PCD in order to satisfy City required
parking regulations; to revise the lake area stage plan; and provide a service area
screening plan, subject to the conditions of approval contained herein, which are in
addition to the general requirements otherwise provided by ordinance:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
ALL OF THE PLAT OF REGIONAL CENTER PARCELS 27.12, 27.14, AND LAKE
VICTORIA GARDENS AVENUE AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 94, PAGES 4Q
THROUGH 42, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
Planning and Zoning
1. Permits and occupational licenses for the Downtown at the Gardens site
shall be limited to a total of 271,050 square feet of mixed use shopping
center use, including up to 70,000 square feet of restaurant, and a total of
3,032 cinema seats (68,087 square feet), or the equivalent thereof, based
on park'rng and traffic equivalencies.
2. Prior to the issuance of each accupational license or bui{ding permit for
interior renovations of tenant spaces, the Downtown at the Gardens
Associates, LTD., its successors, assigns, or agent shall submit a
breakdown by use (retail, office, and restaurant) of the gross square
footage for lease for approval by the Growth Management Department with
the required parking allocations.
3. No service shall be e�ended to outdoor seating areas that are not included
as part of the restaurant allocation plan. Outdoor seating for restaurant
service shall be included in the total square footage for the restaurant.
4. The 50-space temporary parking lot near the parking garage, directly east
of building M, shall remain as permanent spaces unless an approved site
plan amendment modifies the requirement.
3
Resolution 58, 2009
5. The temporary parking on the Gosman property shall no longer be required
upon City Council approval of this Resolution. In no case shall this parking
be used by Downtown at the Gardens beyond June 21, 2010, without
further appraval by City Council.
6. The Applicant, successors, or assigns shall have the option of building a
second parking garage on si#e in order to remove the limitations on square
footage allocations for specific uses. Landscaping and photometric plans
for the west parking garage shall be submitted to Growth Management for
review and approval. If the parking garage is proposed in a different
location or is not consistent with the approved master pfan and elevations,
City Council approval shall be required for the square footage allocation,
site plan, elevations, landscaping, photometrics, and all other land
development regulations that apply during the site plan review process for
the second garage prior to construction.
7. Prior to issuance of permits for the parking garage, the applicant,
successors, or assigns shall be required to bond the parking garage
improvements. Permits for new tenants that require the parking garage to
satisfy the City's parking requirements shall be permitted once the garage is
deemed 75 percent complete by the Building Official. No occupational
licenses for new tenants shall be permitted prior to issuance of certificate of
completion or final acceptance of the garage improvements.
8. Downtown at the Gardens Associates, LTD., its successors, or assigns
shall complete installation of four (4) gates for service areas ("K", "H", "E", &
"I/J") within the following timeframes:
29 • Service area "K" installed by March 31, 2010.
30 • Service areas "H," "E," &"I/J" installed by September 30, 2010.
44
45
46
47
9. Within 30 days of City Council approval, Downtown at the Gardens
Associates, LTD., its successors, or assigns shall provide a cost estimate
for the cost of materials and installation of all service area gates, for review
and approval by the City in order to establish surety. The cost estimate
shall be signed and sealed by a professional registered in the State of
Florida. Surety will be based on 110% of the total combined approved cost
estimates and shall be posted with the City within 45 days of receipt of the
City's approval of the estimate.
10. Service area gates shall be opaque and of a color and material compatible
with the building fa�ade, as shown on the Typical Courtyard Screen
rendering attached.
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Resolution 58, 2009
11. A master lake park area plan shall be submitted prior to June 30, 2010, for
review and approval by City Council. The improvements proposed in this
plan, either a stage or other substitute improvements as agreed upon by the
City, will be cornpleted by November 30, 2010.
12. Within 30 days of City Council approval, Downtown at the Gardens
Associates, LTD., its successors, or assigns shall provide a cast estimate
for a stage or other substitute improvements as agreed upon by the City,
including all landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the
City in order to establish surety. The cost estimate shall be signed and
sealed by a professional registered in the State of Florida. Surety will be
based on 110% of the total combined approved cost estimates and shall be
posted with the City within 45 days of receipt of the City's approval of the
estimate.
: � .
13. The stage terrace shall not be elevated more than 30 inches above grade
without a safety railing.
14. A safety railing on the lake retaining wall shall be installed by October 16,
2009. A building permit shall be required.
Code Enforcement
15. The lake side exterior wall face shall be regularly maintained in a manner to
present a c{ean and neat visual appearance.
16. Service area gates shall remain closed at all times, excep# when trucks are
in the process of loading or unloading.
17. Gates shall be installed so as not to block crosswalks while open, except for
the gate for service area "K," which shall only block the crosswalk while the
truck is picking up or dropping off the compactor.
SECTION 2. This amendment to #he Downtown at the Gardens Site Plan is
hereby approved subject to strict compfiance with the Exhibits attached hereto and
made a part hereof, as follows:
1.
2
Dawntown at the Gardens, Site Plan Data, by Cotleur Hearing, March 13,
2009, Sheet 1 of 4.
Downtown at the Gardens, Site Plan, by Cotleur Hearing, March 13, 2009,
Sheets 2 and 3 of 4.
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
�s
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
3.
4.
Resolution 58, 2009
Downtown at the Gardens, Site Details, by Cotleur Hearing, March 13,
2009, Sheet 4 of 4.
Downtown at the Gardens, Master Plan — Alt. Plan Includes West Garage,
by Cotleur Hearing, revised May 22, 2003, Sheet 3 of 15.
5. Downtown at #he Gardens, East Parking Garage and West Parking Garage,
Sheets PG-1 & PG-2, by Oliver, Glidden, Spina, & Partners, March 10,
2003.
C�
7
Q
Typical Courtyard Screen rendering.
Plans for Service Areas "E," "H," "K," and "I/J," by Glidden, Spina, and
Partnecs.
Downtown at the Gardens, Plan of Proposed Eievated StagelTerrace,
overhead sketch, and section sketch.
SECTION 3. All previous conditions of approval shall remain in full force and
effect except as modified hereinabove.
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall become effective immediate(y upon adoption.
(The remainder of this page intentianally left blank)
C
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Resolution 58, 2009
PASSED AND ADOPTED this � day of '�at� �i.e,�G , 2009.
ATTEST:
BY:
atricia Snider, C C, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
L�'E
�
VOTE:
MAYOR RUSSO
hman, City Attorney
VICE MAYOR LEVY
COUNCILMEMBER JABLIN
• i : : :G:► �1
COUNCILMEMBER PREMUROSO
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA
�
AYE NAY ABSENT
�
✓
✓
✓
✓
G:�attorney_sharelRESOLUTIONS�2009\Resolution 58 2009 - downtown at the gardens site plan amendment.doc
r�
���
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
RESOLUTION 27, 2010
A RESOLUTION OF THE CtTY COUNCfL OF THE CtTY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA AMENDING A DEVELOPMENT
ORDER CONDiTIt?N OF APPROVAL FOR DOWNTOWN AT THE
GARDENS LOCATED WlTHIN THE REGIONAL CENTER DRI/PCD,
AS DESCRIBED MORE PARTICUIJ►RLY HEREIN, TO MODIFY A
CERTAIN CONDIT{ON OF APPROVAL RELATED TO TEMPORARY
PARKING LOCATED ON THE GGSMAN PROPERTY; PROVIDING
AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
WHEREAS, the City Council, as the goveming body of the City of Palm Beach
Gardens, Florida, pursuant to the authority in Chapter 163 and Chapter 1 fi6, Florida
Statutes, and the City's Land Development Reguiations, is authorized and empowered
to consider petitions related to zoning and land develc�nent orders; and
WHEREAS, the City rec:eived petition MISC-10-44-0()OOG9 from Downtown at
the Gardens Associates, I.TD. and IMI Kyoto Gardens t LLC for an amendment to the
site plan condition of approval No. 5 of Resoiution 58, 2009 for the Downtown at the
Gardens project located within the Regional Center Development of Regional impact
(DRI) and Planned Community Development (PCD), as more particularly described
herein, to aflow for the continuation of temporary parking for valet and employee
parking until December 21, 2011; and
WHEREAS, the subjec:t site is zoned Planned Community District (PCD) Overlay
with an underlying zoning of Commercial �nd 4ffice; and
WHEREAS, the subject site is part of the Regional Center DRI approved by
Resolution 9, 1984, as amended; and
WHEREAS, the Dovmtawn at the Gardens project was first approved by City
Council on June 5, 2003, by Resolution 91, 20Q3, which designated the mix and
amount of allowable uses and provided for a number of deve{opment waivers and
conditions; and
WHEREAS, Resolutio� 93, 2003 was approved concurrently to amend the DRI
allowing the new mix of uses for powntown at the Gardens and revising the conversion
matrix to include an equivater�y provision; and
WHEREAS, on May 15, 2003, City Courxx;il adopted Resolution 92, 2003, which
approved the lake tract improvement site plan for the lake/park area within the DRI; and
1 WHEtiEAS, on Decernbes 18, 2003, City Council approved
2 2003 to modify the DaHmtawn at the Gardens site plan by deletin
3 11, 000 square feet, reduce the number of theater seats to 3,130,
4 regional retail square footage by 1,473 square feet; and
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Resolution 27, 2010
Resolution 212,
g an unaccounted
and increase the
WHEREAS, on September 29, 2005, Resolution 120, 2005 approved an
amendment to the Downtcrnm at the Gardens site plan and lake improvement plan of
the DRI by modifying certain oonditions of approval, deferring some elements of the
lake improvement pian, adding unused remaining DRI entitlements of 1,032 square feet
of office space to the subjec� site, and providing for other modifications and waivers,
including a waiver to the screening requirement for the service areas from public view;
and
WHEREAS, on Jarwary 10, 2005, an administrative approval revised the
number of cinema seats to 3,020 and realfocated 1,800 square feet of space between
two proposed buildings (M1 and M2}; and
WHEREAS, on June 21, 2007, Resolution 66, 2007 approved an agreement
befinreen Downtown at the Gardens Associates, LTD. and the City related to the
Applicant's vioiation af the praject's Development O�der, Resolution 120, 2U05, in
regard to parking requiremei�ts at Downtawn at the Gardens, and provided a term sheet
to the agreement outlining temporary relief to the parking issues while the Applicant
developed a long-range solution; and
25 WHEREAS, on Septembef 24, 2009, Reso(ution 58, 2009 approved an
26 amendment to the site pl�, replaoed the most curre.nt shared parking analysis with
27 parking regulations from the City Code, revised the lake area stage plan, and approved
28 a service area screening plan; and
29
30 WHEREAS, the City Councit has c�onsidered the evidence and testimony
31 presented by the Applicarrt and ott�er interested parties and the recommendations of
32 the various City o# Palm Beach Garden.s' review agencies and stafF; and
33
34 WHEREAS, the City Courxx:il deems approval of this Resolution to be in the best
35 interests of the heaith, safety, and weffare of the residen#s and citizens of the City of
36 Palm Beach Gardens and the public at large.
37
38
39 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
40 OF PALM BEACH GQRDENS, FLORIDA that:
4'1
42 SECTION 1. The misvellar�ea.is pe�ition (MISC-10-Q4-OOOOG9) from Downtown at
43 the Gardens Associates, LTO_ and IMI Kyoto Gardens f LLC is hereby APPROVED for
44 the Downtown at the Gardens project, located on a 35-acre site, more or less, within
45 the Regional Centec Development of Regional lmpact (DRI) and Planned Community
2
Resolution 27, 2010
1 Developmerrt (PCD), as more particuiarty described herein, in order to modify condition
2 of approval No. 5 af Resolutian 58, 20U9 in acxordance with the conditions of approval
3 contained herein on the follawing de.scxibed real property:
4
5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION
6
7 ALL OF THE PLAT OF REGIONAL CENTER PARCELS 27.12, 27.14, AND LAKE
8 VICTORIA GARDENS AVENUE AS RECORDED Ild PLAT BOOK 94, PAGES 40
9 THR4UGH 42, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BECH COUNTY, FLORIDA. (more
10 commonly known as °Dawntawn at the Gardens°).
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Plannin4 and Zoninq
1. Downtown at the Garde�s Associates, LTD. and fMi Kyoto Gardens I LLC
is hereby permitted to temporarily utilize the Cosman property, for valet and
emplovee aaricinc� onlv. untii Dec;ember 21, 2(J11 for the patrons and
employees of Dov�mtown at the Gardens. One six (fi} month exte�sion may
be approved by the Gron�vth Management Administrator, or designee, so
long as Dawntawn at the Gardens Associates, LTD. and fMl Kyoto Gardens
I LLC submits the request in wrfing prior to Decernber 21, 2011. The
temporary approval f� use of the Gosman property for valet and employee
paricing as set fiorth hereinabove is s�pe�ific to Downtown at the Gardens
Associates, LTD. ar�d tMl Kyoto Gardens I LLC and shatf not be transferred,
sold or assigned in any manner whaisoever. Sale or transfer of any
ownership interest in Dovvrrtawn at the Gardens sha{I automaticaliy render
this approva! rwll and void. (Planning � Zoning)
SECTION 2. All previous c�nditions of approva! shall remain in full force and
effect except as modfied hereinabove_
SECTION 3. This Resolution shafi bec�orme e�ctive imrnediately upon adoption.
(The remainder o� this page irrte.ntionally left blank)
�3
' 1 PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3
2
3
Resolution 27, 2010
� day of '��Nt- , 2010.
4 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA
5
6 -- -- ,
'�__ _ �:; --_ �9�
,� . �. `�-/-�;�� - BY: David Lev
/'� . - ; Y,
� #ii AI��S V. �; _ --
1� 1- v�---- _
; :1 �-�` =---�i � :
1 �r �
14 � B-1�-�
15 Patricia Snider, CMC, City Clerk
16
17
18
19 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
20 LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
21
22
23
24 BY:
25 R. M oh an, City Attorney
26
27
28
29 VOTE:
30
31 MAYOR LEVY
32
33 VICE MAYOR PREMUROSO
34
35 COUNCILMEMBER RUSSO
36
37 COUNCILMEMBER JABLIN
38
4� COUNCILMEMBER BARNETf
4
42
43
44
45
46
4% G:lattornev share\RESOLUTIONS�20101Resolution 27 201
AYE NAY ABSENT
�
,/'
�
�
�
0- Downtown at the Gardens oarkina Aamt amPndmPnt rinr
4
���/,
i�� � .r
/
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Meeting Date: June 12, 2012
Petition: PUDA-12-05-000038
SubjectlAgenda Item:
PUDA-12-05-000038 Midtown Planned Unit Development Amendment
Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council: A request from Mainstreet at
Midtown, LP and Palm Beach Community Church, Inc. to make modifications to their
approved signage program. The Midtown Planned Unit Development is located at the
northwest corner of Gardens Square Boulevard and PGA Boulevard.
[X] Recommendation to APPROVE
[ ] Recommendation to DENY
Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Finance: PZAB Action:
Director of Planning & Planning & Zoning: Accountant [] Rec. Approval
Zoning Project Manager [] Rec. Approved w/
_ -�; ; Conditions
1- , ` . °'`'' � � . j�:
Natalie M. Crowley, AICP Y Sara Varga �] Rec. Denial
Kathryn DeWitt, AICP [] Continued to:
Sr. Planner
Fees Paid: N/A
Development Compliance
,,' [X] Quasi — Judicial Funding Source:
Bahareh Wolfs, AICP �] Legislative
[X] Public Hearing � ] Operating
City Attorney X Other N/A Attachments:
Advertised: � �
[X] Required • Development
[] Not Required Budget Acct.#: Application
R. Max Lohman, Esq. Pa er: Palm Beach N/A �
p Project Narrative
Post
Approved By: Date: 06/01/12 Contract/Aqreement: . Location Map
City Manager Effective Date: • Resolution 104, 2006
Affected parties: N/A
• Sign Location Plan
Ronald M. Ferris [X] Notified
[] Not Required Expiration Date: • Signage Exhibits
N/A
• Landscape Plan
Meeting Date: June 12, 2012
PUDA-12-05-000038
Page 2 of 6
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Mainstreet at Midtown, LP and Palm Beach Community Church, Inc. are requesting to modify
the approved signage package for the Midtown Planned Unit Development (PUD). The
modifications include the addition of a new monument sign, addition of tenants to the existing
monument signs, and a waiver to allow a changeable copy sign. Staff is recommending
approval of the requested modifications.
BACKGROUND
On August 5, 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance 13, 2004 and Resolution 92, 2004
approving the Midtown PUD to allow 64,025 square feet of retail / commercial use, 19,950
square feet of restaurant use, 10,900 square feet of professional office use, a 64,533-
square-foot cultural center and church, and 225 multi-family units.
On August 17, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution 85, 2006 approving a master sign
program for the project. Non-residential monument signs were not included in this approval.
On November 16, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution 104, 2006 amending the
master sign program to add the non-residential monument signs (see attached Resolution
104, 2006). Five (5) monument signs were permitted based on the lineal street frontage of
the development (see attached Signage Plan). A waiver was included to allow the
monument signs to exceed the maximum length requirements.
On July 19, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution 27, 2011 approving an amendment to
the Midtown PUD to allow an additional monument sign for the Borland Center, Inc. The
Applicant's request for the sign to be changeable copy was denied.
LAND USE & ZONING
The subject site has a Mixed Use (MXD) Future Land-Use designation, and is zoned PUD
overlay with an underlying zoning of Mixed Use (MXD). The site is also located within the
PGA Boulevard Corridor Overlay.
Table 1. Existina Zonina Land Use Desianations
Subiect Propertv
Midtown
North
Garden Lakes
South
PGA Commons
Vacant site
West
Gardens of Woodberry
East
Gardens Square Shops
PUD / MXD
PUD / Residential Medium
PUD / MXD
PUD / Professional Office (PO
PUD/RM
PUD / General Commercial (CG-1)
MXD
RM
MXD
PO
RM
Commercial (C)
Meeting Date: June 12, 2012
PUDA-12-05-000038
Page 3 of 6
CONCURRENCY
The subject petition does not propose any modifications to the existing concurrency
approvals.
PROJECT DETAILS
Site Details
The Midtown PUD is approximately 47 acres in size and has six (6) points of vehicular
access. The site has two (2) points of access from Gardens Square Boulevard, two (2) points
from PGA Boulevard, and two (2) points from Shady Lakes Drive (see Location Map). No
changes to the existing access on site are proposed.
Subiect Request
The Applicant is proposing an additional monument sign, addition of tenant names on the
existing monument signs, and a waiver to allow a changeable copy sign. The additional
monument sign is proposed to be located at the southern most entrance into the project from
Gardens Square Boulevard. The sign is eight (8) feet tall by nine (9) and one-half (1/2) feet
wide and contains the "Mainstreet at Midtown" name with three (3) tenant names.
The second part of the subject request is to add three (3) tenant names to each of the three
(3) Midtown monument signs located along PGA Boulevard. These signs are shown as "MID
1" on the attached Sign Location Map. In order to add the tenant names onto the monument
signs, a condition of approval listed in Resolution 104, 2006 needs to be eliminated.
Condition No. 4 in this Resolution reads, "The Midtown Monument signs shall not include any
tenant signage." The proposed three (3) tenant names are located below the "Midtown"
name and utilize black lettering to maintain consistency with the existing monument signs
(see attached signage exhibits). The tenant names meet the minimum height requirement of
six (6) inches.
The third part of the Applicant's request is for a changeable copy sign to be located on the
south elevation of the Borland Center building just east of the rotunda. The subject sign is 34
inches high and approximately eight (8) feet wide. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) panel of
the sign is 32 inches high and 21 square feet. The sign is located on the building within the
opening of the arcade, closest to the rotunda. This location is facing Main Street and cannot
be seen from any public rights-of-way or residential areas. The sign is setback behind
Building B and is approximately 315 feet from PGA Boulevard.
Waiver Requests
The Applicant has requested two (2) waivers.
(The remainder of this page intentionally left blank)
Table 2. Waiver
� I78-285, Table 24,
Permitted Signs
2 I 78-284(9)(6),
Prohibited Signs
uests
1 sign for first 300 I.f.
ROW plus 1 for ea. A
dditional 700 I.f. ROW
Changeable copy signs
prohibited
5 signs permitted
6t" sign previousiy approved
7tn monument sign requested
Changeable copy sign
Meeting Date: June 12, 2012
PUDA-12-05-000038
Page 4 of 6
1 sign Approval
Changeable Approval
copy sign
1) The Applicant has requested a waiver from Section 78-285, Table 24, Permitted Signs,
to allow an additional monument sign on the site. Five (5) signs are permitted by code
and one (1) additional monument sign was approved with Resolution 27, 2011. There
are three (3) "Midtown" monument signs and three (3) "Palm Beach Community
Church / Borland Center" signs located on PGA Boulevard. The seventh sign is
requested to better direct visitors coming from the Garden Square Shopping Center to
the east. This particular location is a secondary entrance so most drivers do not think
of accessing the restaurants from this location. A sign in this location will be beneficial
to drivers on Garden Square Boulevard, as well as those coming from the Garden
Square shopping center. The proposed sign is eight (8) feet tall by nine (9) and one-
half (1/2) feet wide, smaller than code allows for a monument sign and substantially
smaller than the other monument signs on the site. The sign is consistent in color and
style with the other "Midtown" signs. Staff supports the requested waiver.
2) The Applicant has requested a waiver from Section 78-284(g)(6), Prohibited signs and
prohibited sign locations, to allow a changeable copy sign on the Borland Center
building. The proposed sign is 34 inches high and approximately eight (8) feet wide.
The LED panel of the sign is only 32 inches high. The sign is located on the south
elevation of the Borland Center building just east of the rotunda in one of the openings
into the arcade. This proposed sign would face Main Street and will be blocked by
Building B from visibility from any public rights-of-way or residential areas. Conditions
have been included with regard to the manner in which information is displayed on the
LED sign. The sign is not permitted to have animated graphics, all the letter colors
must be the same, and the sign cannot advertise for a use or tenant other than the
Borland Center. Staff supports the requested waiver.
Staff Analysis
Staff is supportive of the Applicant's requested signage modifications, which includes the
addition of a new monument sign, addition of tenants to the existing monument signs, and a
waiver to allow a changeable copy sign. The additional monument sign on Gardens Square
Boulevard will help patrons traveling into the site from Gardens Square Shopping Plaza or
driving down Gardens Square Boulevard recognize this as an entrance into the Midtown
project. The proposed sign is smaller in size and is consistent with the color and style of the
existing signs on the site. This sign will help the project gain more identity on Gardens
Square Boulevard and to patrons of the Gardens Square Shopping Plaza.
Staff is supportive of the Applicant's request to eliminate Condition No. 4 of Resolution 104,
2006, which prohibits tenant signage on the "Midtown" monument signs. Allowing three (3)
Meeting Date: June 12, 2012
PUDA-12-05-000038
Page 5 of 6
tenants on each of the existing monument signs will greatly assist vehicular traffic to identify
those tenants located within the project. Due to the nature of the project, the majority of the
tenant signs are located internally along Main Street. City Code allows up to five (5) tenant
names on monument signs. In order to maintain the existing look of the signs and keep the
base free and clear of any text, the Applicant is proposing to limit the number of tenants on
each sign to three (3). The tenant signs will be required to have black lettering to maintain
consistency and minimize the visual impact of the new signage. A condition of approval has
been included as a measure of assurance.
The Applicant submitted an application in 2011 for a changeable copy monument sign that
was denied by the PZAB and the City Council. This application included a monument sign
located on PGA Boulevard with an overall size of 66 square feet. Staff did not support the
request, because the sign was highly visible to public rights-of-way and residential areas and
was not compatible with the character of PGA Boulevard. However, the Applicant is now
proposing a changeable copy sign that will have minimal impact to the surrounding area. The
changeable copy sign would be near the entrance to the Borland Center building. Based on
its location, size, and use, staff is supportive of the proposed sign. The location of the
proposed sign is not visible from any public right-of-way or residential area. The sign will be
blocked from PGA Boulevard by Building B, from Shady Lakes Drive by the rotunda on
Building G, and from Gardens Square Boulevard by the rotunda on Building J. In addition,
the distance of the sign from the adjacent rights-of-way will further decrease the visibility of
the sign. The proposed sign location is approximately 850 feet away from Shady Lakes
Drive, one-quarter mile away from Gardens Square Boulevard, and 300 feet from PGA
Boulevard; therefore, the sign will not be visible from any of the surrounding public rights-of-
way or any residential community. The proposed sign is approximately 21 square feet in
size. The small size of the text area will have minimal impact to the surrounding area. The
intent of this sign is to inform the public about events occurring at the Borland Center. The
events held at the Borland Center are cultural in nature, including plays, movies, music
concerts, and other theatrical events, and are specific to the community. The proposed sign
will have minimal impact on the surrounding area within Midtown due to the location, size,
and intent.
The proposed signage modifications will increase way-finding for vehicular and pedestrian
traffic while minimally impacting the surrounding area. Staff is supportive of the subject
request.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC)
All outstanding comments from the Development Review Committee (DRC) have been
satisfied.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends APPROVAL of petition PUDA-12-05-000038 with the following conditions:
All tenant names on the monument signs shall be black lettering. (Planning and
Zoning)
Meeting Date: June 12, 2012
PU DA-12-05-000038
Page 6 of 6
2. Scrolling, flashing, jumping, fade-in/fade-out, running, bouncing, and/or animated
script or graphics of any type is strictly prohibited on the changeable copy sign.
(Planning and Zoning)
3. All text shown on the changeable copy sign shall be the same color. (Planning and
Zoning)
4. Commercial advertising for a use or tenant other than the Borland Center is prohibited
on the changeable copy sign. (Planning and Zoning)
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Planning and Zoning Department
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
10500 North Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
(561) 799-4243 Fax (561) 799-4281
Request:
��Planned Community Development (PCD)
�,!Planned Unit Development (PUD)
�X;Amendment to PCD, PUD or Site Plan
�LOndiiionai use
I- - .,
�;Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
�Administrative Approval
�Administrative Appeal
Project Name: The Borland Center (a.k.a. Midtown
��Annexation
��Rezoning
�Site Plan Review
'�Concurrenc Ceriii�caie
I... - Y
j�Time Extension
Miscellaneous
��Other
Date Submitted: � 05-15-12 ;
---------..... _. _ _.. _ _ ............. ...... _ �
Qv�iner: Mainstreet at Midtown Limited Partnership and Palm Beach Community Church lnc.
Applicant (if notOwner):
Applicant's Address:4801 & 4901 PGA Bivd, PBG, FL 33�TelephoneRio. 561.63G.6110
Agent:Cotleur & Hearing Inc.
ContactPerson: Alessandria Kalfin E-Mail: AKalfin�Cotleur-Hearing.com
Agent's Maiiing Addrpss:1934 Commerce Lane, Suite 1, Jupiter, FL 33458
Agent's TelephoneNumber: 561.747.6336 x128
Petition Number:
Fees Received
IApplication $
Receipt Number:
FOR OFFICE USE
Date & Time Received:
Engineering
����� '
�����C;y,� '
�� � rl
�� ��.
�
Architect: Not applicable
Engineer:Not applicable
Planner: Cotleur & Hearing Inc.
LandscapeArchitect: Cotieur & Hearing inc.
Site Information: Note: Petitioner shall submit electronic digital files of
approved projects. See attachment for details.
Genera) Location; North side of PGA Blvd, just west of Military Trail
Address: 4r�ui rvH �souievara
Section: �� Township: 42 Range: 42
PropertyControl Number(s): 52-42-42-01-00-000-7030 / 52-42-42-01-00-000-7020
Acreage: 47 ac CurrentZoning: MXD PUD RequestedZoning: N/A
Flood Zone B � Base Flood Elevation (BFE) - to be indicated on site plan
CurrentComprehensive Plan Land Use Designation:MXD
Existing Land Use: Mixed Use Deve;opment Requested Land Use: N/A
Proposed Use(s) i.e. hotel,singlefamily residence,etc.: N/A
Proposed SquareFootageby Use: N/A
ProposedNumberandType of Dwelling Unit(s) i.e. singlefamily, muliifamily, etc. (if applicable}:
N/A
2
Justification
Information concerning all requests (attach additional sheets if needed.)
{Section 78-46, Application Procedures, Land Development Regulations.}
1. Explain the nature of the request:
The applicant is requesting a PUD Amendment to allow for one additional new monument sign by waiver
to be located on Garden Lakes Drive, directly north of J. Alexanders. The appiicant is requesting to delete
a condition of approval (#4) of Resolution 104, 2006 to allow tenant signage on the existing Midtown monument
0
signs. See justification statement for more deta�l. The applicant is requesting a changeable copy sign. The
applicant is requesting 12 additional temporary special event signs for the use of the Borland Center.
2, What will be the impact of the proposed change on the surrounding area?
Not applicable.
3. Describe how the rezoning request complies with the City's Vision Plan and the following elements
of the City's Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Infrastructure,
Coastal Management, Conservations, Recreation and Open space, Intergovernmental Coordination
and Capital Improvement.
Not applicable.
4. How does the proposed project comply with City requirements for preservation of natural
resources and native vegetation (Section 78-301, Land Development Regulations)?
Not applicabie.
5• How will the proposed project comply with City requirements for Art in Public Places (Chapter
78-261, Land Development Regulations)?
Not applicable.
6. Has project received concurrency certification?
Yes
Date Received: Jan ?, 2004
Legal DescriptionoftheSubjectProperty
(Attach additional sheets if needed)
Or see attached deed for legal description.
Location
The subject property is located appro�mately 0•25 mile(s) from theintersectionof
PGA Blvd & Military Trail , pn the� north,�east,�.southnwest side of
PGA Blvd (street/road).
�
Statementof Ownershipand Designat'ronofAuthorizedAge�t
Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared David A. Dean, Authorized
Representative who, being by me first duly sworn, on oath deposed and says:
�, That he/she is the fee simple title ow-,�er of the property described in the attached
Legal Description.
2.
3.
That he/she is requesting PUD Ame�dment
City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.
That he/she h.as appointed Cotleur & Hearing Inc.
as authorized agent on his/her behalf to accomplish the above project.
in the
to act
Mai.nstreet at Midtown Limited Partnership; By: Mainstreet at Midtown LLC, its
General Partner; By: Midtown Real Estate Partners Z,imited Partnership, its sole
Name of Ow i:Member and Manager; By Midtown GP, =nc., its General Partner
David A. Dean, Authorized Representative
S atu Owner By: Name/Title
4801 PGA Bivd PBG FL 3418
StreetAddress
P. O. Box
561-630-6100
TelephoneNumber
E-mail Address
,
City, State, Zip Code
City, State, Zip Code
Fax Number
Swornandsubscribedbeforemethis 2 dayof May 2012
o Pubiic
My Commission expires:
June 22, 2013
��':3u�.., STACY M. TALBOT
-��'' �:
;,: Commission # DD 901254
�` a: Expires June 22, 2013
:,
�%%i �no�; BondedltxuTroyFaut�ns�uanre804385d019
Applicant's Certification
I/We affirm and certify that Uwe w�derstand and will comply wi#h the land deveiopment regulations of
the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. I We further certify that the statements or diagrams made on
any gaper or plans submitted here with are irue to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. Further,
Uwe understand that this application, attachments, and application fiiing fees become a part of the
official records of the Ciry of Palm Beach Garde��, F rida, and are not returnable.
Applicant is:
Signatureof App icant
Ma�nsfreet at Midtown Limited Partnership; By. Mainstreet at
MidWwn LLC, its General Partner, By: Midtown Real Estate
✓ Owner Pariners Limited PaiMership, its sole Member and Manager, By
" Midfewn GP, Inc., its General ParNer
Print Name of Applicant
n Optionee 4801 PGA Blvd
� StreetAddress
� Lessee PBG, FL 33418
City, State, Zip Code
[ Agent 561.630.671Q
�; Contract Purehaser
TelepiioneNumber
Fax N umber
E-Maii Address
C�
F � '.
i i �.
-s i��::
,�-�
�; �� �
gI ��� 3
�r,
Palm Beach Gardens Pianning and �oning Department
1050a North Mflitary Trait, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 3341 D
561-799-4230
Permit #
Financial Responsibility Form
The owner understands that all City-incurred professional fees and expenses associated with the
processing of this application request are ultimately fihe responsibility of the owner. A security
deposit shall be deposited in an interest bearing account with any accrued interest ta be retained by the
City of Palm Beach Gardens.
The owner and/or designee shall be invoiced on a monthly basis for professional fees such as, but not
limited io, consultant engineering services, legal services, advertising costs, and/or any other costs
aftributable to the processing af the permit for which the Cify incuired during the previous monfh. The
owner and/or designee shall reimburse the C'rty within thirty (30) days from date of invoice. If payment is
not received, the City may utilize the security deposii for re-imbursementpurposes. All acfivitiss related
to the penciing permit(s) will cease until any outstanding invoices are paid.
TIl_F_ AW[1P_1'IfIP__SI�1'1pP f�1�F1a�' ��nrl.orrt�n�� �hMa �:u^..��fc: viiii:� ic�Mv�i�iviii y 3,iaii Pcyuiic a
completed fo.rm, signed and notarized by the responsible party, and delivered to the City Planning
and Zoning Department if the name and/or address of tFe responsible parLy changes at anytime
during the appl' 'o revisw process.
May 2, 2012
Owner signature Date
Mainstreet at Midtown Limited Partnership; By. Mainstreet at Midtown LlC, its General Padner, By.
Midtovm Real Estate Partners Limited Partnership, its.sole Member and Manager, By Midtown 6P,
���. i4s General ParNer 52-42-42-01-00-000-7030
Owner printed nam� Properfy Control Number
DE�IGNEElBILL TO:
Mainstreet at Mid#own Limited Partnership
Designee Acceptan�e Signature
4801 PGA Blvd, PBG, FL 33418
NOTRRY ACKNOIIVLEDGEMENT
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
I hereby certify that the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2 day of
May , 20_, py David A. Dean , t�e or she is personally known
to r�ne or has produced as identification.
,,;�i::"'••- STACY M. TAk.BOT
public s�gna ture _--;� �� Commission # DD 901254
��; Expires June 22, 2013
Stacy Ni. Talbot ''-�r„pF�.��' e«�an�,T�orr�i��eoo-�es-�ms
Printed name
State of Florida at-large My Commission expires: June 22, 2013
�ta�e��nt�� �,vur, �r��i� �i�� t3�ig�t�����f �1��c�r'�xer�A��i�
�3��.�r�. �a��, r#ie. ��n�ict��,iane 1.�#zit�t�t�i� j?�����J?3aii}; ta��La�4c�;,�.�y;;�t�#z��_����'I�,'
�,h<�; i��i;i�; �� ��a�• fit'�t t���f}~s�an},i?�i: c�°�tl� c���3z�:;�e! 4�nc� ���,�;:
�k � �1�i�.I.�ef�?tc ts th� f� �iip�le rrtl�:�a'��+��'.�?f tl�r� �z?i?g5�r#v ct�,�t��a�u`�ti.�ti=i�i�ltii'� t�ci1;
t ����' L�cs4��i}�f���t,
�x,}�A7°�u>titia�l��t iri �1��
�;; 1'��� �;e,�it� is t'�t�uc:tti�ta;; ..,_,,,,.�._ .. �W-�--�-.--,---
, �%t�:�z��.FF?��t�a.L?cn�,h�is��i����� �`Ir.i•rci�:
3. `l ���s��c'�h� #��s t����>��i��sc� ���t��c � i���S�g it� �„ �; �T�� sc+�c�
_ ��ae�f[i�+Ci?���!�ezz�`�t�.t;a�.�li�3�t3t���'iz3g�������It��t-i�t�t�t�ot��5a'��p��i,
' ` � . +,�. . � a�i
:
����� P����td � ���� �����8 „ � _u_ . �. ,
.,_,..�_:-� ,�� . �--�-_- .. ;_:.
:�,,..�..... w �------ --°� C� ���� �p Cz�i��'.
�1�`��'��tc�s.�r�g� •` �`� °
�,I�.r,
�y-�y--, �.+,m-�7�-�-�5----..� ,:�.- :�. _,
..-"`"�--�"�—"�"" � •__ ,°.,-�i,::;�--°'_ .S..i�v�4`�i�fl.L[iL.+L?4.i�:
� :�� ���r
�k "fi'^^�.�i�-�'�}1�—#7"�}�'�`,��, 's.�-�. ... . . ` ".��-y±-.-.—.—�-"':,."""�'',.i .�
�'���p�ca{���i�r�be� �� ��s3���lit�beY
,y ����=�. � .
����3� ,������ ,_
���+ vAEili�li5�tt3C��ki}�itGS;'
�� ��� .> .:
�
��S�a�ie �aii is.
�:�����
�` E��Cs�nk�:
� I s.s.�`Ci�i
E"` k��c��t
�.w" ����Y�ti�t T�,�tt�G�i'���r
�,it�.�#�c
49G'k P�A,HI�rd:
���� �� ��i�i'�5� � :�.____.��.....,., - . ...
T'��� ����1.#f�
, . � . . _, _ .� �..�. R:.
�!lt}�� ���� �ip Ci�i� :.
�..���°`' ���� � �€��� �� �r �:
�;_-.�..�.a�._:. -- _._
�"�:3�p�ar���3�zm�?�r
....-- �-- � _ . -�° - _,
�� �?� ;���r�i�i'
-
_ .� ��_._..,
� t�as� l�c��)re���
�s���t �zf ii��
� �n.� rc.� l � � �
�
��
���� �;
��
. �;:
'e,.� d .
.. „�,,,;..'
n�Fm _B�ac� �r�rd�n�t"��,rr� �ns �� �i� J��,sam�aa
Yc��{�nh�i�z��";���'���ln£�=¢s�z��r��ns �i 'i3�t�o,=
bfal-r�k9--i�.t+3=,
t��>'ttglt �t�� .. �� . . . a
�t1f�iS�3al, 3�#35 jaUtl�2bfiSi�y,�'r�t'i�
i 1l�.� t��. � C*� .�� r��a ,_. ���2'�.:-;��^�-�lIA tii,�u';
�"�`� �? �` # � ��.,�._.�= '
� .n�� �� �r�#-�i`�z�tu�sna�' , . .. ����2t���r����I��€����:
t���tGl����3i�- %,t�;
\
ass���� �i�}� ���3 �� ���� .. �:;
-
_ ., v�.
._-_ _ _ _ ��» ,. �M:_
��"��`� ��'
��� :��
p��c���t�;is?�#��t t:
�
'' � � � � � _� _.
� �'�ri��r�c#�t'���
����,
���i�: �F �,,.�.�"`�� , �?�.l�rri�: tv3y �prnxri���t�r�. ���k��� . . �: � . � .
�
.. .". :: Prepened try and ReEurn to:
. ' �� `: � Ksren D. eieller, Fs9-
�. � � :Gunster, Yoakley & Stewart, PA.
" �� 800 SE Monterey Cammons Blvd., Ste. 200
Stuart Florida 34996
(772) 288-1980
Pazcel ldeniification No.: 5242d201000007020
S242d2Q10U00Q703Q
����r������������u���A��»�
CF.N:::�mQ►50?�Ql67.�2.::'c. �-�'��'�.`-- `-..:-...�_..:.'..' :.
Oh, ::-P,�.::::1�83�4::`-:PG.:�:�..tb5� �... : �. .
RECORDED.:�13012005_::i3:15:37..:. .�`.: �. �.:: :._�.:_ :.:.; -.
._ � .-._.
P.a2w�:�Beaah;:County,_;Fiorida::.:: .�:_ .. : _._:...
A1�T 2i'.'.�.'��r.000 W0 ;�:
Doc:�StataP.::15r.8�0.:00. .:• .° �� . ` .
Shsr�sn 'R. Boa1c; CLH&K . 8 C011PTROLLGR
Pge 1054 - 1055r t�pgs?
SPECXAL WARRANT'Y DEED . :. . - : . : : : � . . . . � -
THIS SPECIAL WA.RI2.4NTY DEEDmade this 17�' da.y June, 20t}5,
gy: PALM BEACH COMMUI�TI1'Y CH[7ItCH, INC., a Florida not for-profit corporation
("Grantor"), 'whose post office address is: 3970 RCA Boulevard, Suite 70U9, Attention: Dr. Ray
Underwood, Palm Beach Gardens, �L 33410,
To; MAiNSTR�ET AT NIIDTOVYN LIlVIITED PARTNERSffii', a Florida limited
partnership ("Grantee"}, v�rhose post office address is: c!o RAM Re�ity Services, 3399 PGA
Boulevard, Suite 450, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410.
WITNESS�TIi:
THAT GRANTOR, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten ($10.40) Dollars and
other good and vatuable considerations to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt and
snfficiency wheceof is hereby acknowledged, by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, alien,
remise, release, convey and conium unto Grantee the following real properiy, situate, lying and
being in the County of Palm Beach, State of Florida, more particularly described as follows (the
"Properiy"):
Tract Z of ihe Borland Center, aecording to the Plat fhereof as recorded in
Plat Book 104, Page 110, of ifie Public Records of Pslm Beach County,
�lorida.
5UBJ�CT TO: Taxes for the current and subsequeut years and restrictions, reservations,
limitations easements of record, which reference sha11 not operate to reimpose the same, and
wning ordinances affecting said property, if any.
TO AAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple.
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that fee simple title to the Property shall automatically
revert to and revest in' Grantor on that cerkain date ninety-nine (99} yeazs from the date hereof
(the "Reverter Date"); provided further, however, that as of the Reverter Date; (i) Grantor sball
continue to remain the fee simple owner of Tract 1 of the Borland Center, according to the Plat
thereof as recorded in Plat Book 104, Page 1 l0, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County,
Florida, as Tract 1 is legally described as of the date of ihis deed; (ii) title to the Property shall
not revert to Grantor if a release of the reverter has been recorderi in the public records of Palm
Beach County, Florida; (iii) Crrantor continues to operaie as �. not-for-profit F[orida corporation;
Swart 207701.5
Gl17/OS
and (iv) the reverter is personal to Grantor herein, is not assignable and shall not run to Grantor`s
successors in title and/or assigns.
AND GRANTOR HEREBY COVENANTS with Grantee that Grantor is lawfully
seized of said land in fee simple; has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said
land; hereby fully warrants the title ta said land and will defend the same against the lawfiul
claims of all persons claiming by, through or under Grantor.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused these gresents to be executed. by its duly
authorized officer the day and yeaz Srst above wntten.
Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of:
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
PALM BEACH COI��VITJNITY CIiURCH,
1NC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation
By: ��
ond E. Underwood, President
The foregoing instrument was aclaiowledged before me this►` 7�day of `'�`'�`'`''�-, 2005,
by Raymond E. Underwood as President of PALM BEACH COl��]MUNITY CHURCH,INC., a
Florida. not-for-profit corporation, on behalf of said corporation. He is personall
known to me or produced �r as icjentification.
/ /�f`---�—'�"_ -.
Notary Public, State of Florida
[Notary Seal]
3vrMWM
; ��:r �,� sr�v� cof�%�
=�; �_ t•dY GOMMISSION � DD 211022
�� � IXPIRES May 17 2007
p;;;d: ��dnmt�yr�imaenwe�
� Cotleur&
} �� .
�_ -�� ��-Iearing
Landscape Architects I Land Planners I Environmental Consuftants
1934 Commerce Lane • Suite 1° Jupiter, Florida • 33458 • Ph 561.747.6336 • Fax 561.747.1377 • www.cotleurhearing.com • Lic # LC-0000239
Mainstreet at Midtown
Master Sign Plan (PUD) Amendment
Introduc#ion
Mainstreet at Midtown Limited Partnership and the Borland Center for Community Enrichment, the
applicants and property owners, are seeking approval of an amendment to the Nlidtown Master Signage
Program. The approved plan was approved most recently by the C�ty Council in August 2006 by way of
Resolution 85, 2006. The master sign plan was approved by way of Resolution 104, 2006. The purpose af
this amendment is to update the existing monument signs along PGA Boulevard, to add a new
monument sign on Garden Lakes Drive, to add a new changeable copy sign to Mainstreet within the
project, and to increase the number of temporary special event signs permitted for the project.
Specific Requests and Fees
PUD Amendment $2,000.00
Legal Escrow $1,000.00
Engineering Escrow $1,000.00
TOTAL $4,000.00
Contact Information
Agent/Land Planner/Landscape Architect
Cotleur & Hearing, Inc.
1934 Commerce Lane, Suite 1
Jupiter, FL 33458
Phone: (561) 747-6336
Contact: Alessandria Kalfin/Donaldson Hearing
Requests
Applicant
Mainstreet at Niidtown LP
4801 PGA Boulevard
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33.418
Phone: (561) 630-6110
Contact: Keith Van Druff
Applicant
The Borland Center
49G1 PGA Boulevard
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418
Phone: (561) 904-3116
�ontact: Dr. Raymond UnCerv✓ood
Existin� Monument Si�ns
The applicant is req�esting to modify the master sign plan to update the existing M�dtown freestanding
ground signs to be more consistent with other signs alcng the corridor and to be consistent with ihe
curr�nt freestanding ground sign code. The first modification to the master sign plan is to update three
existing monument signs within the Midtown project, all along PGA Boulevard. The first two signs are at
the main entrance of the site. The third sign is on the corner of PGA Boulevard and Garden Lakes Drive.
These signs were identified as MID-1 thru MID-3b of the master sign plan. The applicant is proposing to
add three tenant names to the existing signs. Condition #4 of Resolution 104, 2005 states that "The
,;�' C3Q� � '1
��'�/ `'
� , a� +, �y
'' �1�.a�'
�t�° �`��-' ,,
� ,� �C
.,�.�.
Midtown PUD
CH# 98-1205.01
PUD Amendment
]ustification Statement
May 14, 2012
Revised May 21, 2012
Midtown Monument signs shall not include any tenant signage". The appiicant is requesting to delete
this condition to permit tenant names on the existing monuments signs.
The new tenant names will be attached to a 13" cabinet and will be a 7" letter height. The applicant is
proposing to increase the height of the sign by 1-foot to add an aluminum backsplash plate with pinned
%" thick, 7" aluminum letters. The letters will read "Mainstreet at". The existing lettering in front of the
sign is also proposed to be modified. The applicant is proposing to relocate the existing freestanding
"MIDTOWN" letters in front of the sign and to attach them to the existing sign behind them. The
applicant has provided detailed landscape plans for each of the signs. These detailed plans indicate that
there are no landscape conflicts, hardscape conflicts, or utility conflicts with the modifications.
Proposed Monument Si�n
The second modification to the master sign plan is for one additional monument sign. The applicant is
proposing one additional monument sign on Garden Lakes Drive, directly north of J. Alexanders on the
north side of the driveway. This sign does require a waiver to the PUD. Currently there are five existing
monument signs for the Midtown PUD and six approved. The code permits one monument sign for the
first 300 lineal feet of right of way and ane for each additional 700 lineal feet of right of way. Based on
the sites right of way frontage, only five signs are permitted, however an additional sign was recently
approved by waiver. With the new sign a total of seven ground signs would be permitted.
The purpose of the sign is to better direct visitors coming from the Garden Lakes Shopping Center to the
east. Currently it is very di�cult to navigate on Garden Lakes Drive since it is such a minor right of way.
This particular location is a secondary entrance so most drivers do not think of accessing the restaurants
from this location. A sign in this location will be beneficial to drivers on Garden Lakes Drive as well as
those coming from the Garden Lakes shopping center.
The sign is only eight feet in height, two feet less then the code requires, and nine and a half feet wide
at its widest point (base). The majority of the sign is only seven and half feet wide. The sign will be
treated with identical lettering and fonts as the signs discussed earlier herein. An aluminum backsplash
plate with pinned aluminum lettering will be at the top with the words "Mainstreet At". The lettering
below will rriimic the existing monuments as well with the word "MIDTOWN" at a 14.5" letter height.
The center af the sign w�ll list three tenant names with lettering between 6.5" and 5". The sign colors
are consistent with the existing master s;gn plan color pallet.
Proposed Chan�eable Copy Si�n
i"he Borland Center is seeking approval for a building walt sign with changeable copy to be located on
their building's south elevation just east of the rotunda. The intent of this sign is to inform the public
a�out events at the Borland Center. The events held at the Borland Center are rich in culture and
specifically catered to the community. They are offered to residents and visitors for the good of the City.
The proposed use af this sign will be similar to the changeable copy sign at the Eissey Theater in the vvay
the college displays theatrical events and shows.
The subject sign is 34-inches high and approximately 8 feet wide. The LED panel of the sign is only 32-
inches high. The sign is located on the building in one of the openings into the arcade, closest to the
-2-
Midtown PUD
CH# 98-1205.01
PUD Amendment
]ustification Statement
May 14, 2012
Revised May 21, 2012
rotunda. This location is facing Main Street and cannot be seen from any pubiic right of ways or
residential areas such as Shady Lakes, PGA, or Garden Lakes.
Waivers
The applicant is requesting one (1) waiver with this petition.
1 78-285 Table 24 4,500 lineal feet of ROW frontage for 3,535 lineal feet of ROV`✓ frontage
additional ground sign.
2 78-284 (h) (6) No changeable copy signs Changeable copy sign with
electronic message capability
Criteria
(1) The request is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan.
Waiver 1—The additional monument sign is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan. The
plan does not restrict additional ground signs. The sign vvill assist with directing vehicles ar�d
making a safer driving environment, consistent with the plan.
Waiver 2—The changeable copy sign is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan. The plan
does not restrict changeable copy signs. The sign will allow the Borland Center to communicate
information about upcoming cultural events, consistent with the plan.
(2) � he request is consistent with the purpose and intent of this section.
Waiver 1- The additional monument sign will meet al! other freestanding ground sign code
requirements, including height, width, area, base, setback and landscape.
Waiver 2— The changeable copy sign will meet all other building wall sign code requirements,
inciuding height, width, area and location.
(3) The request is in support of and furthers the city's goals, objectives, and policies to establish
development possessing architectural significance, pedestrian amenities and linkages,
employment oppor�unities, reductions in vehicle trfps, ard a sense of place.
Waiver 1— The a�ditional monument sign on Garden Lakes will encourage linkages between
the Publix center and the Midtown center. It will reduce vehicular trips from getting back onto
PGA Boulevard as well.
Waiver 2— The changeable copy sign will provide i7formation to pedestrians and will provide
for a sense of place in the Midtown PUD. It will announce cultural events occurring at the
Borland Center �,vhich encourages a sense of place community.
(4) The request demonstrates that granting of the waiver will result in a development that
exceeds one or more of the minimum requirements for PUDs.
Waiver 1— The monument sign will exceed minimum PUD requirement by adding more way
finding for the center, helping the visitors find their way throughout the PUD.
-3-
Midtown PUD
CH# 98-1205.01
PUD Amendment
Justification Statement
May 14, 2012
Revised May 21, 2012
Waiver 2— The changeable copy sign exceeds the requirements by providing a messaging
system that informs visitors and residents about cultural events through out the year.
(5) The request far one or more waivers results from innovative design in which other
minimum standards are exceeded.
Waiver 1— The proposed monument sign is only proposed to be 8-feet in height, less then the
maximum height permitted. It is also less copy area then permitted.
Waiver 2— The changeable copy sign is proposed within the project, not visible to any public
street or to any residential neighborhood.
(6) The request demonstrates that granting of the waiver will result in preservation of valuable
natural resources, including environmentally-sensitive lands, drainage and recharge areas, and
coastal areas.
Waiver 1& 2— These waivers will not effect any natural resources or environmentally sensitive
land.
(7) The request clearly demonstrates public benefits to be derived, including but not limited to
such benefits as no-cost dedication of rights-of-vvay, extensions of pedestrian linkages outside
of the project boundaries, preservation of important natural resources, and use of desirable
architecturaf, building, and site design techniques.
Waiver 1—The new monument sign uses desirable design and site direction techniques to help
visitors find their way through out the center.
Waiver 2— The proposed changeable copy sign is demonstrates public benefits to be derived by
informing the public about cultural events occurring at a cultural arts center throughout the
year.
(8) Sufficient screening and buffering, if required, are provided to screen adjacent uses from
adverse impacts caused by a waiver.
Waiver 1& 2— The proposed signs do not require screening or buffering. The new monument
sign will be landscaped as required.
(9) The request is not based solely or predominantly or economic reasons.
Waiver 1—The new monument sign is not predominantly based on economic reasons. The sign
is needed because visitors have not been able to f9nd tenants within the center. They also have
a difficult time coming from the Pub{ix center to the east.
Waiver 2— The changeable copy sign is not based on economic reasons. It is to increase the
visibility of a not for profit cultural arts center.
�1G) The request will be compatible with existing and potential land uses adjacent to the
development site.
-4-
Midtown PUD
CH# 98-1205.01
PUD Amendment
Justification Statement
May 14, 2012
Revised May 21, 2012
Waiver 1& 2— Both signs are compatible with existing and potential land uses adjacent to the
site because signs are not a use.
(11) The request demonstrates the development will be in harmony with the general purpose
and intent of this section, and that such waiver or waivers will not be injurious to the area
involved or otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare.
Waiver 1— Ground signs are permitted within the code and therefore are in harmony with the
general purpose of this section of the code. By permitting an additional ground sign there will
not be any negative impact to the area involved or detriment to the health, safety and welfare
of the public.
Waiver 2— Wall signs are permitted within the code. The applicant is proposing a changeable
copy wall sign that is not addressed in the code. The changeable copy will be located on a wall
within the center, away from major right of ways. It does not propose to be injurious to the
area or detrimental to the health, safety or welfare of the public.
Conclusion
On behalf of hlainstreet at Midtown and the Borland Center, we feel that the tastefully designed
signage will be a great asset for Midtown and for the Borland Center. The Applicant is looking forward
to working closely with Staff throughout the review process. We hope that the ap�lication can move
expeditiausly towards public hearing in June.
-5-
Location Map
Midtown Planned Unit Development
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Date Prepared: October 9, 2006
RESOLUTION 104, 2006
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CCIUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO
THE MASTER SIGNAGE PROGRAM FOR MIDTOWN {F.K.A.
BORLAND CENTER) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD), TO
PROVIDE APPROVAL FOR THE NON-RESIDENTIAL MONUMENT
SIGNS, AS DESCRIBED MORE PARTICULARLY HEREIN;
PROVIDING FOR WAIVERS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, on August 5, 2004, the City Council approved the master plan and
conditional use approval for the Midtown (f.k.a. Borland Center) Planned Unit
Develapment (PUD) with the adoption of Resolutian 92, 2004; and
WHEREAS, City Council approved the Midtown (f.k.a. Borland Center) Master
Signage Program (MSP) on August 17, 2006, with the adoption of Resolution 85, 2006,
excluding the non-residential monument signs; and
WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting approval of the non-residential
monument signs; and
WHEREAS, the subject site is zoned Mixed Use Planned Unit Development
(MXD/PUD) and has a future land-use designation of Mixed Use Development (MXD);
and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application
and has determined that it is sufficient; and
WHEREAS, the Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board reviewed said petition at
its June 27, 20Q6, meeting and recommended its approval by a vote of 7-0; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the evidence and testirnony
presented by the Applicant and other interested parties and the recommendations of
the various City of Palm Beach Gardens review agencies and staff; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed approval of this Resolution to be in the
best interest of the citizens and residents of the City o# Palm Beach Gardens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA that:
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Date Prepared: October 9, 2006
Resolution 904, 2006
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and ratified.
SECTtON 2. The miscellaneous application from Cotleur & Hearing, on behalf of
Ram Development and Palm Beach Community Church, for the Midtown (f.k.a. Borland
Center) Master Signage Program is hereby APPROVED on the following described real
proper#y, subject to the conditions of approval provided herein, which are in addition to
the general requirements otherwise provided by resolution; ^�^�ed,�.r�°�, +��
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
THE PLAT BOOK OF THE BORLAND CENTER AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 104
PAGES 110 THROUGH 117 OF THE PUBLIC RECORD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY
FLORI DA.
Each building sign shall be directly affixed to the elevation of the tenant
space for which that sign identifies. (Planning & Zoning)
2. Each building sign shall not exceed 70% of the immediate vertical and
horizontal surFace area to which attached, provided the sign does not exceed
the maximum size far copy area. The maximum size for copy area shall be
5% of the tenant elevation for tenant signs, and the lesser of 3% af the
principal tenant elevation or 90 square feet for principal tenant signs.
(Planning & Zoning)
3. If the Applicant requests two lines of copy for a sign that is reflected on the
Master Signage Program as a singfe line, the total height of the finro lines shall
not exceed the maximum height indicated on the plans for the single line.
(Planning & Zoning)
4. # The Midtown Monument signs ',
��s shall not include any tenant signage. (Planning & Zoning)
SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
hereby approves the following six (6) waivers:
Section 78-285, Permitted Signs, to allow for signs to be located above the
second-floor line as indicated on the master signage program.
2. Section 78-285, Permitted Signs, to allow for two additional signs (blade
and wall) for tenants with at least three elevatians, and one additional sign
for tenants with finro elevations, not to exceed a total of two wall signs for
any tenant.
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1Q
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Date Prepared: October 9, 2006
Resolution 104, 2006
3. Section 78-285, Permitted Siqns, to aliow for the Palm Beach Communitv
Church monument siqns to exceed the maximum lenath bv 14 feet and the
Midtown proiect identification siqns to exceed the maximum lenqth by eight
feet, six inches.
�4. Section 78-285, Permitted Signs, to allow directional signs to exceed the
maximum size by 12 square feet.
45. Section 78-285, Permitted Signs, to allow for directional signs to exceed the
maximum height by 2 feet.
a6. Section 78-285, Permitted Signs, to allow for 10 additional building
directional signs.
SECTION 4. This Master Signage Program approval shall be in campliance with
the following plans on file with the City's Growth Management Department:
1. The Borland Center for Community Enrichment Master Signage Pragram,
sheets 1 through 18, by Glen Welden & Associates, LLC, February 5, 2006,
and received by the City July 11, 2006.
SECTION 5. This approval shall be consistent with all representations made by
the Applicant or Applicant's agents at any workshop or public hearing.
SECTION 6. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
(The remainder of this page left intentionally blank)
3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Date Prepared: October 9, 2006
Resolution 104, 2006
PASSED AND ADOPTED this �6 �day of fJ�de,�r��R , 2006.
CIT
:
ATTEST:
BY:
Patricia Snider, CMC, y Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
BY: ! /
ristine P. Tatum, City Attorney
VOTE:
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR BARNETT
COUNCILMEMBER JABLIN
COUNCILMEMBER LEVY
COUNCILMEMBER VALECHE
AYE NAY ABSENT
✓
�
�
✓
�
11PbgsfileWttomey\attorney_share\RESOLUTIONSImidtown monument signs - reso 104 2006.doc
�
�
�lJi�
Site Plan Indicator
Location of Proposed Monument Sign
C�tleur
Hearing
�����
�
En�*orr�pYal CiGVULr+j
G�+N'c Dt:qn
791i Ca�rtnmto len�
Su�to �
Jv,+ter. F a'Ca 33t58
561.7a7fi196 Fni•7s7.U77
L J
� �
•F•+
� N
� C
V 'a
L
��R
� V
� �
L �
W m
� �
r �
a
REVISED: 05/15/12
' V'f.l_� M1 �. K.
`��.� ....���
i�
��
M�
��
1 �
/,� a
Y`, - �ry • , -. �� !!7'
,� �
�. ,,�... �'� -�t��'
.. � �. . .... ���:^.
� �,_�-�a"�"�__. . . . . . . . . �� _—_ _ .
-_. .��MZViUNIT�.' C���� __
� � � ��- ��..
�� � K , ���. ��,
� � � :,v�' �""� - - — - — - �" I; - � :. , � �,
�� '�
f._.. . .. ... .
y � . - �- -----�--- ._.__s. _
� . � --- � . .. ..
�... ,
; �
L_ �.�
���
. 11
� ,;;
� � ` i� � . �"._
� :�
M ,
�;. :,�
�� ��
,
,��
�
�. �
_. _u_..._ ._�.,.,;:i
.�. .r- . .�...,�
!� �.�.�r .�yyp�
''���,IY a^".�" "'�M-��•
t:� ti
e:C
_ �:
I
�
��
_ , . °.''s# x_ ::'�'.,�
TH
E
..��,
.,
y � t�
. - a. 1 �I.�.�..rJ�11��
��� �
�— --_
,
�
� I
. �
. ' . �,�i�a-
_*
.
''o;
r
__ - �
. . . .: ...n� ' :.. •'. .-- � � ..,�-r ;5�� _
, . . �..w �. �.._ .. . ... � � . _. .. � ..
..-.. . ._ ,., � ' �
. ,_ ._... .. n�.. ' - .
. 'r^"..r"?�MIM�r�; . . .. �..,..��,' _ '^h � t� _. k!��a 4 { � .e.y: �... _.,.. , .. ...
.+r� p.
i
' . .... ::.� _.. . .� �r �. �
.. ���� ��fh`�
ti1IDTC�WN LED Signage
C:otleur
f-iearing
L rC1�e A•U�tnc�re
G4n-rq
En.rcr�+Cat Coro�:��
G+r.+nt Ocs'P�
19}a Carma+ce l.+ro
Su�to t
JW."•er. F�aCa 33t53 �
56t.1�T$3Y� ia..•7:7.17T7
L �
�
� _
U v
L
�a
� �
� �
��
mm
��
��
a
REVISED: 05/15/12
2
. �,�.,_ .,.A.:�:
:�.'��� �-'�-�.
Color Palette
1093 1218
Background Color BM 1218
Panel Color BM 1093
Letter Color Black ( MIDTOWN)
Letter Color White (MAINSTREETAT)
Backplate Color behind MAINSTREEf AT Matte Black
Neon Color White
Tenant Copy Black @ Day White � night
0
�
�
120 "
96 "-
� 93 "-
�� � ► [
�������
BouTiQuE �
:
Fancy Restaurant �
•
INTERIOR DESIGN, INC.
DAYTIME VIEW
TWILIGHT VIEW
1/4" THICK FCO ALUMINUM LETTERS
PIN MOUNTED APPROX 2" AWAY FROM
3/8" BACKSPLASH PLATE. ILLUMINATED
FROM BELOW W/ UPWARDS SHINING LEDs
1/2" PUSH THRU COPY
1/2" PUSH THRU COPY W/ PERF. VINYL OVERYLAY
INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED CABINET
W/ PUSH THRU COPY W/ PERFORATED VINYL
OVERLAY. ILLUMINATION TO BE WHITE
FLORESCENT.
■ — — � ■
■ - ■
900 13th Street West
Rlvlera Beach, FL 33404
Tel: (561) 868-7446
Fax: (561) 848-2270
M A I N S T R E E T A T
MIDTOWN
SMALL MONUMENT
SALE8IPROJECT NGR: JOrty F.
DESIGNER: SG sa DATE: 0�-11-12
DESIGN TIME: 2 HRS
REHISIONS TIME DATE I
DIMENSIONS 20MIN 05•1412
CLIENT REVI510NS SOMIN 05-1rr12
SIGN REVISIONS o5-21-12
Sheet 3
•Due to varying slzes of raw
material, sizaa may vary.
CLIENT
APPROVAL:
DATE: —.....
„
��
1/4' THICK KO ALUMINUM LETTERS PIN MOUNTED APPRDX 2' AWAY FROM 3B' ALUMINUM BACKSRASH
PLATE WfiH 3/16' STUDS AND 12' SPACERS.
ILLUMINAiED FROM BELOW W/ UPWARDS SHINING-6EDs SET IN APPROX. 1' x 1' WATERTIGHT7RACK WfTH
TRANSPARENTACRYLIC LENS ON TOP TO ALLOW L1GHT TO PA55 THROUGH.
1RACK/I.EffER SYSTEM ATTACHED TO TOP OF MONUMENT WITH 1/4' x 3' TAPCONS (EVERY 12° OC)
TRACK SYSTEM PAINTED BLACK TO MATCH BACKPIATE. LED COLOR: WHfTE
1/4' THICK KO ALUMINUM LEfffRS PIN MOUNTED APPROX 2' AWAY FROM 3/8' BACKSPL45H PLATE.
ILLUMINATED FROM BELOW W/ UPWARDS SHINING LEDs
LED COLOR: WHRE (FROM BEL01M
MIDTOWN LETTERS TO BE FABRICATED 3' DEEP REVERSE L€D ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERS
MOUNiED 1 12' FROM WALL SURFACE LEffEH COLOR: SATIN BIACK LED COLOR: WHITE
13'H x 88'W x 4 72' DEEP INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED TENANT CABINETS W/ PUSH-THRU GOPY W/ BLACK PERFORATED VINYL OVERLAY.
CABINETS CONSTRUCTED SHOEBOX SME WRH REMOVABLE fACES FOR TENANTS.
CABINET FACFIRETURN COLOR: BM1093 LED COLOR: WHRE
r w
N
Front View
3/4"
� 5— s � EXISfING MONUMENT (BY OTHERS)
� 77 w I
1 TOTAL SIGN COPY AREA =
49 SQUARE FEET }�• � �•
�
I 3 9�
22' LEl"fERS
0'-21 2'
TENANT I�.AJO.R T-�11..A MT ,3' CABIN S
i �,_5.
7 �
; �st
23'-6"
�f�;c � s.,
S8 w
k''.p•�
End View
�
o'-r
EXISTING MONUMENT
��_2.
■ - - � ■
■ ■
900 13th Stroet West
Rivlera Beach, FL 33404
Tel: (561) 863-7446
Fax: (6i1) 848-2270
M A I N S T R E E T A T
MIDTOWN
MONUMENT
REVAMP
EALEElPROJECT MaR: Jary F
DESIGNER: SG sP DATE:04-09-72
DESION TIME: 2 HRS
REVISIONS TIIdE DATE
SIGN REVISIONS o5-2t-12
ENGINEER INFORMATION
NAME
JOHN HOLT
ADDRESS
925 Azure Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33414
PHONE
561-793-7843
STATE
REG No. 15252
�
EXPOSURE'C"
ASCE 7-10
2010 FBC
BUILT TO WRHSTAND
180 MPH
DATE_/ I
I certify that to the best of my
knowledge, the sign structure
and foundation deslgn meets
or exceeds code requirements
for 180 MPH wind load.
Sheet 4
'Due to varylny slzes of raw
material, sizes may vary.
CLIENT
APPROVAL:
DATE:
„
„
MAJOR TENANT
TENANT
RI-�IJO-R T�M-A MT
i/4" THICK FCO ALUMINUM LETTERS
PIN MOUNTED APPROX 2" AWAY FROM
3/8" BACKSPLASH PLATE. ILLUMINATED
FROM BELOW W/ UPWARDS SHINING LEDs
3" DEEP REVERSE LED ILLUMINATED
CHANNEL LETTERS MOUNTED 11/2"
FROM WALL SURFACE
41/2" INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED
TENANT CABINETS W/ PUSH THRU
COPY W/ PERFOR.ATED VINYL OVERLAY.
ILLUMINATION TO BE WHITE LED
— EXISTING MONUMENT
' I '
DAYTIME VIEW
TWILIGHT VIEW
Background Color BM 1218
Panel Color BM 1093
Letter Color Black ( MIDTOWNJ
Letter Color White (MAINSTREETAT)
Baclq�late Color behind MAINSTREEZ'AT Matte Black
Neon Color White
Tenant Copy Black @ Day White @ night
1zia�
MOORE° �i9
109�
■ — — � ■
■ ■
900 13th Street Weat
Rlvlera Beach, FL 33404
Tel: (561) 863-7446
Fax: (b61) 848-2270
M A I N S T R E E T A T
MIDTO�/VN
MONUMENT
REVAMP
SALESIPROJECT AAOR: Jerry F.
DESIGNER: SG sa DATE: 04-0¢72
DESION TIME: 2 HRS
REVISIONS nr�e a►re i
SIGN REVISIONS 05•27-12
Sheet 5
'Due to varying slzes of raw
material, sizas may vary.
CLIENT
APPROVAL:
DATE:
��
�l.i!i!y_l.�I
0
{���i�._`w.7��'r �
-� �a�
����v'�{i,�r� �-
�� ���
����
II��
MOUND
TO REN
I
EXISTING
ANNUALS
� TO REMAIN
i1�1 ° �VCrt \qF'u"
I
� r� ��� f,�/�I O�
,�♦� 4
��N . i��►,,� ����II���°� II �� �
��;� � �+��� �' iifl� :
♦♦ � �� v ���iill� Ili
►�� N . � \����V�����
►02N ��.:� �;�� :,,
�:� +'Ie'►'�i►a
:Z� �
� __ I
��� r'�IG�� N �����.��� �� � ""'�""""""��"�"�� ��� � ���
�0
��9��` � r�
.
_�������,��` ����/�.��*,�.►�•►.,
_ /I
,I�I�II�I�IIr�� I �
� � � � � �,�\�
\ \ I I \ II \ �
� ( 9��/)
' � � � �i
I� � �
I I I\ I � I
�� � � � i
\
I I I\ \ I �
I � � �\ i�
� I
�
�
BOI�EXISTING I
GAINVILLEj4 I
I TO REMA�N
EX STING � . .
IBURFORD �OLLY + + . . '
\ TO REMAIN —2ROPOSED GOLD
� EXIS ING GOL I MOUND DURANTATO
M�� URANTA bEEXTENDTHE
EMAIN EXISTING GOLD
� '
�
�
���
� , ��;� �
��NOi
� i�0� j��-
..
�' ►-y c-
� ���y����
�Y��8�/�
�� �
���� 'V�
�—✓
��� �`,
� \ ��
►�`�,
_
�
,'
ill \
\
I' I
� /
I'�
EXISTWG TREE I TO
REMAIN 'J /
EXISTINGCOCO LIJrv/
TO REMAIN 11 �
EXISTING PODOµ�ARPUS
TOREMAIN �i
�EXISTING ROYA
PALMS TO REM N �
PROPOSED M N MENT
SIGNTOBE EL
I.00ATED T AV ID
CONFLICTS WITH
EXISTIN�OYALIIPALM
AND EXI MG C j�RBING.
�
/ i
EXISTMG BOTTLE —� V
PALM TO REMAIN
EXISTING JUNIPER TO REMAIN
TING LYTOREMAIN
EXISTING MEDJO Eh
I�-I�YY �'' ■ I�'�''��
•y�
n
1Y Y y�H �
I�4��
�y �����
:�;ti � � � I
������
III�'
�Rj�) � �
��I�,r�� -
�.�-.�
�b - .� � '�. :
������ii .
� l���/
���► ���• .
��
—_�:..,
4:?�,:�
!'ti:'7•
'i\ti�/
� JJ.'�
�� �7,�'T
�.:: �� .
:�yl ,�1
• i•, �
KEY MAP
P/ant List
QTY SYM BOTANZC.9LNAME COMMONNAME SlZE SPACING REMARKS
MED.SHRUBS GROUNDCOVERS VINES
S4 DG DURANTA ERECTA'GOLD MOUND' GOLD MOUND DURANTA #3, 15°x 15" Z' O.G FULL & THICK
220 ANN ANNUALS SFASONALANNUALS 4"POTS 9"O.C. IMPATIENS-WINTER,BEGONIAS-SUMMER
NOTE: ASTERISK (*) INDICATES FLORIDA NATIVE PLANT MATERIAL
Legend ofStandard Symbo/s
SYMBOL DESCR/PT/ON
O, DECORATIVEPEOESTRINNIIGHT _
� DECORATIVEWPLLMDUNiLIGHT
� PPRKING LIGHT _
� ..... FPIPOWERPOLE .... .�. ...
� 81KE RACK
� FIRE HVDft4M �
� WATER SERVICE WITH METER _ __
—H�-- ..... VALVE
.... ..... ........ .... .....
—I�}— DOUBLEDETECTORCHECKVALVEASSEMBLV
�� BACKFLOW PREVENTERASSEMBLY
� FPLTRANSFORMER , .. _
� BENCH
LIE. UTILIN FPSEMEM _ � . _
TVP. .... TVPICAL ... ... .. ...
g SIGNAGE
.......... .......... ...... .......
00 00 GRFASE TRFP
Lahdscape P/ah
O' S' 10' 20' 30' 40'
Sca/e: 1 "= 10' North
Cotleur
Hearing
Landscape Architecture
Planning
Environmenlal Consulting
Graphic Design
1934 Commerce Lane
Suite 1
Jupiter, Florida 33458
561-747 6336 Fax-747-1377
��
�
� ��
�` _ ��.
-c.t�Mn.
�
� �
� �
� �
� �i
W
� �
� `�
� �
� �
O �Q`
� v
�`J k
+
�
�
�
�;
MIDTOWN
JOB
SHEET ��L� z OF s s� zs io.owc
m COTLEUR HEARMG MC.
aAwMo�
bmb�so�ono��pioe6
q�ry eermin�wA1N9�•INYe arzWkGlrtmaElaldx
���,m�<«,�,s��,���
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Meeting Date: June 12, 2012
Petition: PCDA-12-04-000014
Subject/Agenda Item:
PCDA-12-04-000014 Evergrene Planned Community Development (PCD) Amendment
Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council: A request by the Evergrene Master
Association, Inc., for an amendment to the Evergrene Planned Community Development
(PCD) to approve a waiver from Section 78-316 (j), Minimum Separation, for Parcels 1, 2, 6,
7, and 8. The Evergrene PCD is located at the southeast corner of Donald Ross Road and
North Military Trail.
[X] Recommendation to APPROVE
[ ] Recommendation to DENY
Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Finance: PZAB Action:
Director of Planning and Planning & Zoning: Finance: [] Rec. Approval
Zonir�g Project Manager Accountant [] Rec. App. w/ Conds.
�� � [ ] Rec. Denial
� �� �� . � �ti, �� - ,�
iVatalie M.'Crowley, AICP Sara Var a �] Continued to:
Tamashbeen g
Development Compliance Rahman, Planner
and Zoning Manager Fees Paid: N/A
[X] Quasi — Judicial Funding Source:
' [ ] Legislative
Baliareh Wolfs, AICP [X] Public Hearing �� Operating
Advertised: [X] Other N/A Attachments:
City Attorney • Fire Department's
[X] Required
[] Not Required Budget Acct.#: N/A Memorandum of Support
Date: 06.01.12 • Location Map
R. Max Lohman, Esq. Paper: Palm Beach Effective Date:
Post N/A • Development
Approved By: Application
City Manager Expiration Date: . Proposed Site Plans
Affected parties: N/A
[X] Notified
Ronald M. Ferris [] Not Required
Meeting Date: June 12, 2012
Petition: PCDA-12-04-000014
Page 2 of 5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The subject petition is a request to approve a waiver for Parcels 1, 2, 6, 7, and 8 from Section
78-316 (j), Minimum Separation, which requires a minimum separation distance of ten (10)
feet between structures and preserve areas. The Evergrene Master Association has
requested approval of this waiver to eliminate the increased setback requirement for homes
within Evergrene that abut the preserve. Staff is recommending approval of the requested
waiver.
BACKGROUND
On December 20, 2001, the Evergrene Planned Community Development (PCD) was
approved by City Council through the adoption of Ordinance 43, 2001. The Evergrene PCD
is approximately 366 acres in size, and consists of 905 single-family dwelling units and 132
multi-family dwelling units.
On February 7, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution 182, 2001, granting site plan
approval for Parcels 1, 2, and 7. A total of 320 single-family units were approved within the
three (3) parcels.
On November 21, 2002, the City Council adopted Resolution 182, 2001, granting site plan
approval for Parcel 8, Parcel 8 was approved for a total of 105 single-family units.
On May 15, 2003, the City Council adopted Resolution 72, 2003, granting site plan approval
for Parcel 6. Parcel 6 was approved for a total of 74 single-family units.
On December 4, 2003, the City Council adopted Resolution 227, 2003, amending the
development standards for Parcels 1, 2, and 7. This amendment granted a waiver from
Section 78-316 (j), Minimum Separation, for 101 residential units located within Parcels 1, 2,
and 7 of the Evergrene Community to eliminate the increased setback requirement from the
preserve for these homes. It was determined by the City's Fire Department that the preserve
areas adjacent to these homes were narrow enough to gain access to them from the adjacent
roadways; therefore, the 10-foot setback was not warranted. This Resolution did not include
all of the homes within the community that abut the preserve. The subject request includes
the remaining homes that still maintain the increased preserve setback.
LAND USE & ZONING
The subject site has a Residential Medium (RM) future land-use designation and has a PCD
Overlay with an underlying zoning designation of Residential Low-3 (RL.-3).
(The remainder of page intentionally left blank)
Meeting Date: June 12, 2012
Petition: PCDA-12-04-000014
Page 3 of 5
Table 1. Existing Zoning Land Use Designations
• .
Subject Propertv
Evergrene PCD / Residential Low-3 (RL-3) Residential Medium (RM)
North
Abacoa (Town of Jupiter) Mixed-Use Mixed-Use
South
The Isles Planned Unit Development (PUD) / RL-3 Residential Low (RL)
Seacoast Utilit Authorit Public / Institutional (P/I) Public (P)
West
Donald Ross Village PUD / Mixed-Used Mixed-Use
Fiore PUD / Residential High (RH) RH
Magnolia Bay PUD / RL-3 RH
East
Frenchman's Creek PCD RL
CONCURRENCY
The subject request is not proposing any changes to the existing concurrency approved for
the project.
PROJECT DETAILS
Site Details
The Evergrene PCD is located at the southeast corner of Donald Ross Road and North
Military Trail, and encompasses approximately 366 acres. The community has vehicular
access from Donald Ross Road, North Military Trail, and Hood Road.
Proposed Modifications
The Applicant is requesting a waiver from Section 78-316 (j), Minimum Separation, for 164
residential units within Parcels 1, 2, 6, 7, and 8 in the Evergrene PCD. This code section
requires a minimum separation distance of 10 feet between structures and preserve areas.
The intent of the separation distance is to provide sufficient space for the Fire Department to
access the preserves in the event of a brush fire. The 164 afFected homes are those that
have one (1) or more property lines abutting the preserve. All of the affected homes abut the
preserve on their rear property lines and two (2) of the homes abut the preserve on both their
rear and side property lines.
Currently, all homes adjacent to preserves that did not receive a waiver with Resolution 227,
2003, are required to maintain a setback of 10 feet from the preserve areas.
Homes that are not adjacent to preserve areas in Parcels 1, 2, 6, 7, and 8 have a rear
setback of three (3) feet for decks and screen enclosures, zero (0) feet for fences, and five
(5) feet for pools and spas. The subject request will allow the remaining homes adjacent to
preserve areas to maintain the same setbacks as those not abutting the preserve. The
building setback for the 164 residential units will not be impacted by the subject petition, as all
of the homes within the community maintain the same rear building setbacks. Only the
setback for pools, spas, decks, screen enclosures, and fences will be affected by the subject
request. The tables below show the existing and proposed setback chart for a typical 65' x
Meeting Date: June 12, 2012
Petition: PCDA-12-04-000014
Page 4 of 5
120' single-family lot in Parcels 1, 2, and 7. The area circled in the table shows the affected
setbacks. The proposed modification will remove the 10-foot setback and allow the preserve
homes to maintain the same setbacks as the other homes within each parcel.
Table 2. Existing Setback Chart for Typical 65'x 120' lot in Parcel 1, 2, and 7
BUILDING POOL/SPA DECK/SCREEN FENCE
ENCLOSURES
FRONT SETBACK: 20' N/A N/A N/A
FRONT ENTRY GARAGE
FRONT SETBACK: BLDG./ 12' N/A N/A N/A
SIDE ENTRY GARAGE
SIDE SETBACK 7.5' 9' 7.5' 0'
SIDE STREET SETBACK 12' 12' 12' 10'
REAR SETBACK 10' 10'/5'** 10'/3'** 10'/0'**
Table 3. Proposed Setback Chart for Typical 65'x 120' lot in Parcel 1, 2, and 7
BUILDING POOL/SPA DECK/SCREEN FENCE
ENCLOSURES
FRONT SETBACK: 20' N/A N/A N/A
FRONT ENTRY GARAGE
FRONT SETBACK: BLDG./ 12' N/A N/A N/A
SIDE ENTRY GARAGE
SIDE SETBACK 7.5' 9' 7.5' 0'
SIDE STREET SETBACK 12' ' ' 10'
REAR SETBACK 10' 5' 3' 0'
Waiver Request
The applicant is requesting one (1) waiverwith this petition.
Meeting Date: June 12, 2012
Petition: PCDA-12-04-000014
Page 5 of 5
Staff Analysis
The Evergrene Master Association is requesting a waiver to allow the remaining homes
within the community, which are required to maintain an increased setback due to their
proximity to the preserve, to follow the same setbacks as the other homes in each parcel.
The intent of the separation distance is to provide sufficient space for the Fire Department to
access the preserves in the event of a brush fire. The City's Fire Department has determined
that any brush fire occurring within the preserve areas can be controlled via the surrounding
roadways or by the use of fire hoses between the residences. This same determination was
made when Resolution 227, 2003 was approved for 101 homes abutting the preserve. The
subject request includes the remaining 164 homes that abut the preserve, but were not
included in the 2003 petition.
Additionally, while Section 78-316 Q) requires a 10-foot setback from the preserve for all
structures, property owners are not restricted from planting vegetation within this 10-foot
area. A number of homeowners have installed vegetation within the 10-foot area making it
unusable as an access point. The City's Fire Department has no objections to eliminating the
10-foot setback requirement for homes abutting the preserve (please find attached the Fire
Department's memorandum of support), and staff recommends approval of the requested
waiver.
COMMENTS FROM THE DEVE�OPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC)
On May 4, 2012, the subject petition was reviewed by the DRC committee. At this time, all
comments related to the project have been satisfied.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends APPROVAL of petition PCDA-12-04-000014 with one (1) waiver and the
following condition:
GIS
1) Within ten (10) days of approval of the subject petition by the City Council, digital files of
approved site plans shall be submitted to the GIS Manager. (GIS Manager, Development
Compliance Officer)
��`"
�hd a l�
f��
I �,
"�, �
���
I ��J
CiTY O� PAL�VI BEACH G�►►RDERI�
10500 N. MILITARY TRAIL PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410-4698
FIRE RESCUE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Tamashbeen Rahman, Planner
APPROVED: Peter Bergel, Fire Chief
FROM: Scott Fetterman, Deputy Chief
DATE: Apri126, 2012
r, j � - -
,
� � z ��, , � -- _ _
RE: PCDA-12-04-000014: Requesting approval of an amendment to
the Evergrene Planned Community Development (PCD) to
remove safe zone requirements for 164 residential units in Parcels
1,2,6,7and8.
Fire Rescue has reviewed the above referenced PCD Amendment and is
supporting the request based on the following:
Initially the "Safe Zones" were established to provide access to Fire
Rescue to the preserve areas in the event of a brush fire. The property
owners were restricted from installing fences and building in these areas
but not restricted from planting vegetation. As the properties have
matured, many property owners have planted trees and other vegetation in
the 10-ft "safe zones" making them unusable as an access point.
The existing preserve areas in the Evergrene development can all be
accessed by Fire Rescue from existing roadways or by the use of hand
lines going between the residences.
Thank you for your assistance and consideration in this matter. Please
contact me if you have any questions or any future changes are proposed.
-r�s-�. E��.-�.�r-._.a sits �. ~ _ L+ . . � � a �. .-a.._ . .. r;: . . _ .... Y�l�' } . .�iT - �fFt ri�`'�.�.�''w1� _ �� ,j��il, ;i�: � ... . � . _ . _ �. � _ � � .I � � � s � � I{ i` �� �;� , � ` � N a. T�•
� .
_ _ _ . �._ -�.,a-.� '�.�s-s.�.. _ _ ' - - _ - . �._ �_>�..L.,+..t...' _ __.��-+.�rrs�s. �. v_ •�_� Y � � � ' '"`� "'Y
- - � ' �,� - - r ... - — _ - 4.de�.. e s�.. u�ft� 1 -_� t ' c��"a �d n _� _ « «_-.� __...a_��_ �'z �
. ` .
,� �J� � �w, _.
� .. : � _. _ _ .i _
��"' � E -.,�'j'�,. , ��'E' , s�'°°� `t� - � - C °rr� �
, , - � l . + � E � ' :� � ' .;`p' „'�y -�' ` �+f "' �r�! �;',�t
_ "c`.'s'c �a��� -�ct� ; ���� _ ��1.° ^(r 7;�� r - ..r,. . .�7� " . - "� .
� - . �I' � ��-•�+s..�' �-i.. .N C-�k r � �� ~ � , ' :•V`-.. . ��•IYbT� } a I _ a 1 � s,t.^� ' ^L .��y� 4 `5 � �,�A ��,, *,i�
_ i�� .! , i �---�•i�; - " .,. , `l '�i,�,hy,,/'� r �, _ f �. � �.
�F�.� � ° ,r..� � �``tF.,'•��'?- i �� 11 f;� I `� 1,��.f �'�;%�'� ,,N � T �r'�`� �t
° . a � �. -��� _ . 4�' ` ., .
Rr��' , � �.� � '� �' �- ,j ' ``*�± ► s 9
rt 1� } -• j a�- . � �' yl� � � . '.� „` ,� � '"'�-s.-��� _ _ - ���. � �^ .q� oe .�J � � 9
�s � - K � �� pl � i .� � -,'Y . 1 l��". iY Ol''� �� '� � e•. 'r".`' v � , ^r �y
�,P !` _ '��,���, •I �r+ � f 1 j �• '� ~ } * 4# r ' � � ��
y,-' * - r r : � e'Y""'1� K1 �� .k,� V ;tisE'•�. � �" ` � . .t. �� s: P �",
., 4 , ¢�j�a .� I i � p. � 1 - �'F .�:; (�
.y_1°y�t � �� j_'� + �.`-'�'i�.-` �+"�<�'�.'R. ��� ,�S;�a �ry�y � ,N '4t t�u:S � .,�y"R ;��. e� �4 :�° �!
� �•�..wl�....L�.I-o 7 '�����.�F �4f�� dr� •1�� ' -Y�' �+ �-'� y � d Y �'k,,
�r. 4 r �'��. ,',t�i $• �' I r. ' j�R ',� �" -. ��- �4 � .
.- "��"�: �+' r `�.• ,� � � s`� � ^` "," r � '� - :i 'rt 1'a
_F h/, 1 f_a � � � �.� . ���•;. � !�' `�- �•� ' w _ 2 '
! } R �
. " ' !� . � , n'r � 1 ,I _ � � .' . 1I .. � , �
�. . n .� �`�",� 4# y I-M` , _ �' , , '�t1;' ... �,.,:C �.. *� � .
� � �- _ �
`
■ " " t N f � � �1 � _� � � � _ ��
y " � ° � �� ` � ..
��_�` r=-- � �. , �� �=��,}. ` � , ' t �" _.;�'.;�= � �. �, " : � �. ' .'r , ��`i ; ..
%.. .� :� _ [: L MSF b t' � � _ '�., . ,� ` �+ o � � 7 ,- . �� b .
�'� � j�_ � • 7 � ,� �'i I,":r + ,�.� [ �� �' � �, a ��F x�, ` �Y,
_ � , .. � • ` .. � + • � I � ' a� � ywf � �'" Y' '�e7 `� . � V �P � � . . � i ' . a . �
, �
.
, r.
�.� . � _ f tr` � ir%� ,'�,`�{ . „ �� y � �
6 , ' �'��"1 ' �'� P'� � ' r`���
, . . ��► � . , l �,
_ �
� 7�� � E +' {
.. '
% i Rti _
� , . ..,-� . ' �c r� � j y `, �I'� � f..( � � � �� ,` ,i�, . .� «. �i � `
I. i . � . � ��tlf �•, w ��� • �
�.�� s . ,., �r( L •x ' e. � 1.�i'•^'� � ��' � •�' ~ e - ':'�c��'�` � z_ 'o;�C� ���F'`� r - -��,� _ �'r" } ° .��, ��
S ��,�c-" - � �
^ . . . . - ;�} � - � w r � �r,,!: � . ;� '_ ' ,� i � � �, �`
�, � �' iM !"� 1 I " ��!1& � � � ��y,4 � � ..�T, �i: _y �}1 ` � �� u: -
I�f . � t .• ' A � y. O -�► . i� � �. � ` � ' +1. / ��� n l'f �� �
1 � � �'
i
fd Y
�
I
c S
�C
,;
1 �
. _
.
� -� z�� �",
� � '
� .. � J'
. � �
� _�1
Y � � � -
` _ '.R+ ` ... � . ? � ...:.. .... 1.�� �•,MiO �� s ' �/ '� � ' �I`f - . .�. _ � j'n - < <p. -1�
.
.
, _ � .
.�' , J 9 � ` ` �I �� � �y�r � �T� a �l. •�� ,,,��� � ; � �y� �.��3 w� A�• °'� �
� i�d' N�.H . � j �V'f „'s -�°� �� - �- -'�"" 't� �,.k_ f ..r�.��yl - �'! i`�� +, _
� �t �1 I �_, ' � _ � ��s °�'..l,l�r �..�o _ _ �; �,;, , �,� .,_-� i � _ t ' . ``-
_ T � � �..��► � i J � _ � �,- � �1 n ; 5� . � '�' y � � ,�
��' ,�4; � ;��' , � � tx �d! � ; � ,��
� � +-•_ , f ��_ � � �9 ' ,I, • Y •� ��5 _ r
t4 � . . _ - ,. . � � G � ` �� K, , . 1 Y � s�t •1�
C�> �,�'_ & �'°� 4 � °�, . ' �� , � � � � + � � �i�� k��r a - '
. � s_�. �.� �'e � r,� ,+ -�� �� ... .�,
, �
�f�� �
K
_: ,�
�
ti�' _
f
�'
- . � � '-!as _
,.:i cM1. s
� k�'
�- ' - :.� � � I ' � �� y� '� I � � � � ��
� 4t� ._.y'iry�:'!P '�._. �f 4 `. � �a A v �,.:�.. �
— - - - ' p �' ' : i��'"��� , �' S.- �� � ,��,� _ .�r � �� � � a•�,
_ r g . - :I � � �. � ` � ' v. "M , �.. -�'# ' p •°� - t!? _
� )".�''11'�•*Q"� t � .y_ '�✓ � � �� � -s; � .��' �� _ ' _ ` �
v � .� � , � � - y .:y � ��(�, � .:. w . : � e .,,.. �. -� : w
1 p � C' � ' ( J �t �r P4 .e.. , . � ` r� �. 7 � � �^�a� ;�R i �i�t C . . -.� . IrA !1 � .
r� ��. �� M��� '��? i I a. r S �"a'• . � ��y u.
� � ' � .' �..�� _ � - 6 '. � i�. � �6 � � � �4 ,4.f .� ' � � .r � r � ! a���� � �'
�1 �C d. . ��� � r''� � �:.,,� I I I ��'� ,f,,-�(t t � 1 � f .;� -r, F
. p' 4 �«:�,�
t, _
•
,:
�-�/ � �i�"�- It � - �, � r � '�.y � ' � "� �
` �
:. ,. _- "� � ,.� � � � � � ..
� �.�, • °� � a � � "'�' : � .}-. - .'�{ . .� � �� p .
° , �_ a � ��-.� : '„ f � �„ "� iy�ry ��, . :_:,, -,
F � �� �M � ���� - .� � �1 ��� ��i,. -� +� � ��..� . R �
_ � OY
! ..`
_ .�." r
,��,,.
�
. r
�::
`� �.
b
.. � �. , 1 . 1. � ' F � � .:f � :t� "� ����� � � �7^W� • 4
s �` . '.,.. � li� .�:
^""r �¢ 4 � , .4+` . � • � '*`. � : r � � B�._�' �iy � ��+,� a, , _ �.
♦ •.��J!�� r . � . , - - yi � r�,e,t.'a:' • _ ,
�- JL�L'A, �� • � - . � . r �V� :^(� �,�1 .,.Y .,
� r * ` . 1 «« � ..�.Z . � :_1.� 1' . F� a� �,. 4� , ,.�� ' �
•�-
r ° �,-r ,� K; ''�.
_ '� ,m• �, v R. ,� ��s:' , ��"
hl � '' •�b. a� .� � � � 'I �e � � � � � � .r '� � ' +�= w' � `'; • .� t t '�'. I �=� r�
� ,�, i��k�,�,;�, � � "� . �,�`.; �, ;� �'". ��,�; �: �j,
�� � ¢ ,.��.:�E �``�-;- 1 . A,� � �, {t�_.f s ' � �s'" � i' ,- r R'}�� d °x'' 4 f'� ' � __'.�' �'f-".l
t i' ! � � �* < ,r 1. �fs, ytl��'� •1��', ,F 3 ,^' '?'
..i. � �„� '�j�';T ! .. . c � �� , �,. � r , _ � �� �
�* � A`, . � � ��� , - �� , iN� � s� �� .e a,�..�r� . N'$. � � .. . �
� � � `� � � 1
� �` ,�^"'.�"' 'I 1 .�k, (• r � � �• � � � 1 1 - � �� �� �f� �, �'E � h�!' •'LIi ' � �� �K � � a sa ��:.
",� , � � � ° 'i' � - , ��vj� +i.
�� �- � ,� '.,� i .�. � � . �, ry t � ���� � � � $ ..1' � a , c' M � ;� ��' .',�� s �� � . ' I ��. _ ' �C �� :
�M� � ."s�. 4. ��f ,� � : - 7Cf2 '" � : �` h, r - ' -
� � - :,, j� ;� � d � y� '' :�..� ' •.� ry � �• , '�r. 2--.
.r -
.i
� ` ! �., r y : i t j �i., �
,�• � , , , ' �y/
1
' . •' , . . } �� J• ' i�? �� . r J 'Y� --.5t .� l� � � i *I r � `'. ..�"+F �"r_'. +, �� 9:' -.I� { ���� .•�j.• ' � � � - - - � . � - �'�t4�i .�Y . _
' , t� � �! _ �' � _ _ 's�i1�@ ` � ` , • _`5j�'�` _ � �
r+6-'� j.���.�., .-0 r- - 3 1 T. �.� ���`' _ .. __ �t�• - ��s�! :�i. �•I� ` � �,�.r r . -���.� 1: -� ��R..�1 � M4t~•'
� ♦, ��% h /�. f`--ys t - � 7t. � a 5_y ?�y '�� " �. � • �
; ` , t. ,�.%..S" '_ Y.j' :� I . ._ :� . J �i� .� � � �"•'��. • i� � _ ��, - n1e - � �nu-� - -
, �
�.. � � ♦ yd� �s'� , � � �- ��` ; - �`, .!� �� ', �1.1i^' ;�;� w 1�4,�,
, , .
. •
a ,��y
_ •p � r.'' �'° f�' • . � a R ,�Y °";t..
,,
.. .,
�, �•r i � � �: � � '� � - `� ' �t 'b, � � . t �" 1 �f�
,
. . .
. _ �
� • - �
�+.� , „
, -.
€�
�" f . Tz .11 �.. , �•-; • .. � d - � Rt , F � �
� _. j � . �j . � � �: _ n„ � __ � [ y �� .. � i' ,? _ -� .� 1 iy J � s' �, '�`` , -
,. �
. . �a • -4- , �
y ��_ •� � " � ,�;, ru � � �.+4� ���' '!. �Lrlf i `'� � .. ��' � ._j � �,J �` i.t"� ' �`"+� � ��.
t ►,�'i :� i' �--: , �r ,. �4 ►_.. � � r- _,� .i 4 _f1 .�f' ��„9j��,. , 9 • _P�•1'� F �
. � .�
� y., '' ` � � � � � � '� � ti ''' �� 'Z. �r�``y:. .{'
,: _
;
; :
. _
.
} � 4
' . r .�
} � � • � � YS� � p �' a �' � C � a r � .� A r� �y M� � 'SF � �'"" �" r
� �� ,n
'- . , _4� � � � � 'Me �'` i}�-� .�..���., 4 -j.� ir, °+�i� �' u-'ry a" , � �• '�-a^ � .;• -G' t•`
. . ♦. X� �.. r� `c, a[� t ,� +� � ��I' f �r �}�' �" r �'
- �p O' .i� = i% .'',l i o • - ,� � _ ,` = N ^9t� F '1
� ..___
,.d - _ - '� .. � � ,,,�.�. '�-' '� �'
- 1� :1'� � - - .... �2 """."_.°°_ . -- �- � _ � F._� '�1::�rai.'.�. � .i` , . _. 4�' ri•' •ri��'• i�- j` � � .- �. :� �e,� fl� �I.. .���� �,
' ' - '
� • .� : I ' " �0 ..
: `
. �'� . „ ,�tr'�3 �� .d - s �� , - F �.w
�. . . . �
__ i^"� , , . t.,. � . . � 1 ��` : " � . � � �i� -' -� ; ' �`�.° ,,,..�. .-� : , �� '�'�'e �,: F � rd � . _ ��,J°�"L,'''� " � -
,
.
.
—,t _ �
.
.'
,
.��.s�. �,, • � q � _
� •.
� � � N�
u
. � . .. �v. . '
'. - ��, �, t, ,• -
1 ,
. . - . . � - +PF .,., ; w . i, . , . � _, 'A, +C` ��°`, „'►
� . . . -.. '. _ . `- � � -r _. � ,t
. .,
� ...: � �.. . - � ., �� .... . __ . ... �. :... . . . ,
� � � , � . . . �� ,� , _. _. . . . , . . �. - - r.� ii � i '�i �
� � � � �� � l �I � ),d 47 a �. _ __ ,- - � _ _
� � � � •
� � � �:.
.�.
•
;fK � :
, ___.:, :r. ._.,.- �� ,.�..:.,.. ;,...-.. ,,. - s�_,: � sz-.�..-.: ,.' �-s�. �,_ — '
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Planning and Zoning Department
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
10500 North Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
(561) 799-4243 Fax (561) 799-4281
Request:
�Planned Community Developrnent (PCD)
�;Planned Unit Development (PUD)
�X Ainendment to PCD, PUD or Site Plan
�Conditional Use
�Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
�;Administrative Approval
�;Administrative Appeal
Project Name: Evergrene PCD
Owner:
�Annexation
�Rezoning
(�';Site Plan Review
�'';Concurrency Certificate
� Time Extension
�'';Miscellaneous
�Other (�Waiver
I � � __
Date Submitted: May s, zo� 2 '
Applicant(if notOwner): Evergrene MasterAssociation Inc.
Applicant's Address: 650 Everqrene ParkwaV Telephone
Agent: Land Design South of Florida, Inc.
_ ...... _....._
561) 626-1981
ContactPerson: Lindsay Libes E-Mail: LLibes(a�landdesignsouth.com
Agent's Mailing Address: 40o Columbia Drive, Suite 110 West Palm Beach, FL 33409
Agent's TelephoneNumber: 561-537-4542
Petition Number:
Fees Received
IApplication $
Receipt Number:
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Date & Time Received:
Engineering$
� ��
F-t�DN�`'
';�,:,���i+l���
Q�
, ��iN��y(� �
.��_..✓'
Architect: NA
Engineer: NA
Land Design South of Florida, inc.
Planner:
LandscapeArchitect: NA
Site Information: Note: Petitioner shall submit electronic digital �les of
approved projects. See attachment for details.
General Location: south side of Donald Ross Road, between Military Trail and Alternate A1A.
Address: 650 Evergrene Parkway
Section: 41
PropertyContro) Number(s):
42
Township:
Acreage: NA CurrentZoning: PCD
52
Range:
RequestedZoning: Same-no change
Flood Zone NA Base Flood Elevation (BFE) — to be indicated on site plan NA
CurrentComprehensive Plan Land Use Designation:RM
Residential Same-no change
Existing Land Use: Requested Land Use:
Proposed Use(s) i.e. hotel,singlefamily residence,etc.:
Residential
Proposed SquareFootageby Use: NA
ProposedNumberandType of Dwelling Unit(s) i.e. singlefamily, multifamily, etc. (if applicable):
NA
2
Justification
Information concerning all requests (attach additional sheets if needed.)
{Section 78-4b, Application Procedures, Land Development Regulations.}
1. Explain the nature of the request: The Applicant is requesting approval of a PCD Amendment
to the Evergrene PCD in order amend the Site Plans to remove the 10' Safe Zone Setback requirements for
164 residential units. Please see Projec# Narrative for additional details.
2, What will be the impact of the proposed change on the surrounding area?
The request to remove the Safe Zone Setback requirements for 164 residential units will have no impact
on the surrounding area, as outlined in the Project Narrative.
3. Describe how the rezoning request complies with the City's Vision Plan and the following elements
of the City's Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Infrastructure,
Coastal Management, Conservations, Recreation and Open space, Intergovernmental Coordination
and Capital Improvement.
NA
4. How does the proposed project comply with City requirements for preservatiorl of natural
resources and native vegetation (Section 78-301, Land Development Regulations)?
f�L•1
5. How will the proposed project comply with City requirements for Art in Public Places (Chapter
78-261, Land Development Regulations)?
NA
6. Has project received concurrency certification?
Yes
Date Received:
Legal Descriptionof theSubject Property
(Attach additional sheets if needed)
Or see attached deed for legal description.
Location
The subject properiy is located approximately � mile(s) from theintersectionof Donald
Ross Road and Alt A1A , on the� north,�east,�✓ .south�west side of Donald Ross
Road
(street/road).
�
Appiicant's Certification
I/We affirm and certify that l/we understand and will comply with the land development regulations of
the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. I We further certify that the statements or diagrams made on
any paper or plans submitted here with are true to the best of my/aur knowledge and belief. Further,
I/we understand that this application, attachments, and application filing fees become a part of the
official records af the City of Paim Beac Gardens, Florida, an re not returnable.
,
Applicant is: � � ' � �S
ignatureof A lica ,
�-
(� Owner
(— Optionee
� Lessee
� Agent
� Contract Purchaser
Lindsay Libes
Print Name of Applicant
400 Columbia Drive, Suite 110
StreetAddress
West Palm Beach, FL 33409
City, State, 2ip Code
561-537�542
TelephoneNumber
561-478-5012
Fax Number
LLIBES@LANODESIGNSOUTH.COM
E-Mail Address
�
LAN D Planning
DES I G N Landscape Architecture
Environmental
S O �T� Transportation
I Graphic Design
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Evergrene PCD
Safe Zone Setbacks
PCD Amendment & Waiver
Submitted: April 4, 2012
Resubmittal: May 8, 2012
RE U EST
The Applicant is requesting approval of a PCD Amendment to the Evergrene PCD. This request is necessary
in order amend the Setback Charts for the Site Plans associated with Parcels 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8, to remove the
Safe Zone Setback requirements for 164 residential units. In addition, the request to remove the Safe Zone
Setbacks requires a waiver from the City's Zoning Code Section 78-316 (j).
SITE LOCATION AND ACCESS
The Evergrene PCD is located at the west corner of Donald Ross Road and Alternate A1A. Access to the PCD
is from Donald Ross Road, Hood Road and Military Trail.
H ISTORY
The Evergrene PCD is a residential community approved for 1,037 residential dwelling units. The PCD is
comprised of eight (8) neighborhoods. At the time of the original approval, five (5) neighborhoods
contained Safe Zone Setback regulations for certain lots within these neighborhoods, due to their proximity
to preserve areas. These Safe Zone Setback requirements are 10', as outlined in Section 78-316 (j) of the
City's Zoning Code. Resolution 227, 2003 granted a waiver from the setback requirement for single-family
homes on the 65-foot wide lots, allowing 'for a rear setback of 3 feet for decks and screen enclosures; 0 feet
for fences; and 5 feet for pools and spas for lots 81 through 828 of Parcel 2". In addition, the same
Resolution granted a waiver from the same Code Section for single-family homes on the 50-foot wide lots,
allowing for a"0 foot setback for fences and decks, a 3 foot setback for screen enclosures, and a 5 foot
setback for pools and spas".
However, since the time of the original approval, it has been determined that these Safe Zone Setbacks are
no longer necessary for the development. Thus, this PCD Amendment request is necessary in order to
remove the Safe Zone Setback for approximately 164 residential units (Parcels 1, 2, 6, 7 and 8) in order for
those lots to apply the same setback requirements as the others within the community.
PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS
Each of the affected Site Plans has been revised to modify the Setback Charts for the 164 residential units
that will be affected by the removal of the 10' Safe Zone Setback requirement. An Exhibit accompanying
this Application request lists of the Neighborhood, Parcel #, Lot and Address of each of the units that will be
impacted by the proposed PCD Amendment request.
WAIVERS
As part of the request, the Applicant is respectfully requesting a waiver from Section 78-316 (j), requiring a
10' Safe Zone Setback. As such, Section 78-158 of the City's LDR's establrsh"es .criteria for waivers.
Evergrene PCD Amendment 1�Page
Safe Zone Setback Requirements t''A''�'�ld�� -
�,�
�NrN� ,�
�ry� y �
_.i;_ aaS�'
According to the Section, waivers are "to encourage applicants for planned development, PUD, and, PCD,
approval to propose residential and nonresidential projects that are innovative, creative, and utilize
planning, design, and architectural concepts that will be of benefit to the city". The requested waiver is
outlined below:
WAIVER #1: request to eliminate the 10' Safe Zone Setback requirement for the lots outlined in the
provided Exhibit.
WAIVER CRITERIA
The proposed waivers are in compliance with the waiver criteria set forth in the City's Land Development
Regulations.
1. The request is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan.
The proposed request is in compliance with all elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The waiver
is a result of the review and examination of the overall development and individual lots, which
demonstrated that there was no longer a need for a Safe Zone Setback. The lots previously subject to
the 10' Safe Zone Setback requirement will be able to utilize the same setback requirements as the
others within the development, as the 10' Safe Zone Setback requirement will be eliminated. The
waiver will not conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan. To the contrary, the proposed request is
consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The use and
character of the development remains unchanged.
2. The request is consistent with the purpose and intent of this section.
The waiver is consistent with the purposes and intent of this section. The waiver is a result of the
review of the overall development and individual lots, which demonstrate that the Safe Zone Setbacks
are no longer necessary and that the lots previous subject to the Safe Zone Setback requirement can
now utilize the same setbacks as the other lots within the development.
3. The request is in support of and furthers the city's goals, objectives, and policies to establish
development possessing architectural significance, pedestrian amenities and linkages, employment
opportunities, reductions in vehicle trips, and a sense of place.
The waiver request does not diminish the City's goals, objectives, and policies. The waiver request will
allow the outlined lots to utilize the setback requirements enjoyed by other lots within the
development.
4. The request demonstrates that granting of the waiver will result in a development that exceeds one
or more of the minimum requirements for PUDs.
The current waiver request to allow for the elimination of the Safe Zone Setback requirement is
consistent with these criteria, as it exceeds one or more requirements for the PUD.
5. The request for one or more waivers results from innovative design in which other minimum
standards are exceeded.
The waiver request to eliminate the Safe Zone Setback is an examination of the overall development
and individual lots, which result in these setbacks not being necessary for the development.
Evergrene PCD Amendment 2 � P a a e
Safe Zone Setback Requirements
6. The request demonstrates that granting of the waiver will result in preservation of valuable natural
resources, including environmentally-sensitive lands, drainage and recharge areas, and coastal areas.
The lots are already developed. The waiver request will have no impact on valuable natural resources,
environmentally sensitive land, drainage and research or coastal areas.
7. The request clearly demonstrates public benefits to be derived, including but not limited to such
benefits as no-cost dedication of rights-of-way, extensions of pedestrian linkages outside of the
project boundaries, preservation of important natural resources, and use of desirable architectural,
building, and site design techniques.
There will be no adverse impact to public benefits as a result of the waiver request.
8. Sufficient screening and buffering, if required, are provided to screen adjacent uses from adverse
impacts caused by a waiver.
Sufficient screening and buffering has been provided. Furthermore, the granting of the waiver will not
cause any adverse impact to adjacent uses.
9. The request is not based solely or predominantly on economic reasons.
The waiver requests are not based solely and predominantly on economic reasons.
10. The request will be compatible with existing and potential land uses adjacent to the development
site.
The proposed waiver request is compatible with the existing and potential land uses adjacent to the
development site. The overall intent and character of the development remains the same.
11. The request demonstrates the development will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent
of this section, and that such waiver or waivers will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise
detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare.
The waiver request will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this section. The granting
of the waiver will not be injurious to the area involved or detrimental to the public health, safety and
welfare. To the contrary, the site is developed and has proven compatible with the surrounding area.
The approval of the does not change the character or intent of the use. The development will continue
to remain harmonious and compatible with the surrounding area.
Thus, based on the removal of the Safe Zone Setbacks requirements for this development, as outlined in
the information contained herein, the Applicant respectfully requests approval of the PCD Amendment
and Waiver request to the Evergrene PCD.
Evergrene PCD Amendment 3���;�-�
Safe Zone Setback Requirements
LA N D
DESIGN
souTH
PARCEL #1
Planning
Landscape Architecture
Environmentai
Transportation
Graphic Design
Evergrene PCD — Safe Zone Setbacks Exhibit
05/08/12
LOT # BLOCK LETTER NEIGHBORHOOD ADDRESS SAFE ZONE SETBACK
5-D D Vintner's Ridge 1071 Vintner Bivd. Rear
6 D Vintner's Ridge 1069 Vintner Blvd. Rear
7 D Vintner's Ridge 1067 Vintner Bivd. Rear
8 D Vintner's Ridge 1065 Vintner Blvd. Rear
9 D Vintner's Ridge 1063 Vintner Blvd. Rear
10 D Vintner's Ridge 1061 Vintner Blvd. Rear
11 D Vintner's Ridge 1059 Vintner Blvd. Rear
12 D Vintner's Ridge 1057 Vintner Blvd. Rear
13 D Vintner's Ridge 1055 Vintner Blvd. Rear
14 D Vintner's Ridge 1053 Vintner Blvd. Rear
15 D Vintner's Ridge 1051 Vintner Blvd. Rear
16 D Vintner's Ridge 1049 Vintner Blvd. Rear
17 D Vintner's Ridge 1047 Vintner Blvd. Rear
18 D Vintner's Ridge 1045 Vintner Blvd. Rear
19 D Vintner's Ridge 1043 Vintner Blvd. Rear
20 D Vintner's Ridge 1041 Vintner Blvd. Rear
21 D Vintner's Ridge 1039 Vintner Blvd. Rear
23 C Vintner's Ridge 1037 Vintner Blvd. Rear
24 C Vintner's Ridge 1035 Vintner Blvd. Rear
25 C Vintner's Ridge 1033 Vintner Blvd. Rear
26 C Vintner's Ridge 1031 Vintner Blvd. Rear
27-D C Vintner's Ridge 1029 Vintner Blvd. Rear
28 C Vintner's Ridge 1027 Vintner Blvd. Rear
29 C Vintner's Ridge 1025 Vintner Blvd. Rear
4-E E Vintner's Ridge 1104 Vintner Blvd. Rear
5 E Vintner's Ridge 1106 Vintner Blvd. Rear
6 E Vintner's Ridge 1108 Vintner Blvd. Rear
7 E Vintner's Ridge 1110 Vintner Blvd. Rear
8 E Vintner's Ridge 1112 Vintner Blvd. Rear
9 E Vintner's Ridge 1114 Vintner Blvd. Rear
10 E Vintner's Ridge 1116 Vintner Blvd. Rear
11 E Vintner's Ridge 1118 Vintner Blvd. Rear
12 E Vintner's Ridge 1120 Vintner Blvd. Rear
14 E Vintner's Ridge 1132 Vintner Blvd. Rear
15 E Vintner's Ridge 1134 Vintner Blvd. Rear
16 E Vintner's Ridge 1136 Vintner Blvd. Rear
17 E Vintner's Ridge 1138 Vintner Blvd. Rear
Evergrene PCD 1� Page
Safe Zone Setback Exhibit
18 E Vintner's Ridge 1140 Vintner Blvd. Rear
19 E Vintner's Ridge 1143 Vintner Blvd. Rear
20* E Vintner's Ridge 1141 Vintner Bivd. Rear
21* E Vintner's Ridge 1139 Vintner Blvd. Rear
1-F F Vintner's Ridge 1200 Merlot Dr. Rear
35 F Vintner's Ridge 1201 Merlot Dr. Rear
2 F Vintner's Ridge 1202 Merlot Dr. Rear
36 F Vintner's Ridge 1203 Merlot Dr. Rear
3 F Vintner's Ridge 1204 Merlot Dr. Rear
37 F Vintner's Ridge 1205 Merlot Dr. Rear
38 F Vintner's Ridge 1207 Merlot Dr. Rear
39 F Vintner's Ridge 1209 Merlot Dr. Rear
40 F Vintner's Ridge 1211 Merlot Dr. Rear
41 F Vintner's Ridge 1213 Merlot Dr. Rear
42 F Vintner's Ridge 1215 Merlot Dr. Rear
43 F Vintner's Ridge 1217 Merlot Dr. Rear
44 F Vintner's Ridge 1219 Merlot Dr. Rear
45 F Vintner's Ridge 1221 Merlot Dr. Rear
46 F Vintner's Ridge 1223 Merlot Dr. Rear
47 F Vintner's Ridge 1225 Merlot Dr. Rear
48 F Vintner's Ridge 1227 Merlot Dr. Rear
49 F Vintner's Ridge 1229 Merlot Dr. Rear
5 F Vintner's Ridge 1302 Sonoma Ct. Rear
6 F Vintner's Ridge 1304 Sonoma Ct. Rear
7 F Vintner's Ridge 1306 Sonoma Ct. Rear
8 F Vintner's Ridge 1308 Sonoma Ct. Rear
9 F Vintner's Ridge 1310 Sonoma Ct. Rear
10 F Vintner's Ridge 1312 Sonoma Ct. Rear
11 F Vintner's Ridge 1314 Sonoma Ct. Rear
12 F Vintner's Ridge 1316 Sonoma Ct. Rear
13 F Vintner's Ridge 1318 Sonoma Ct. Rear
*Based on preserve shown on Plat.
Evergrene PCD Z�Page
Safe Zone Setback Exhibit
PARCEL #2
LOT # BLOCK LETTER NEIGHBORHOOD ADDRESS i- SAFE ZONE SETBA►CK
1-C C Mill Creek 938 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
44 C Mill Creek 939 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
2-C C Mill Creek 940 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
45 C Mill Creek 941 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
3 C Mill Creek 942 Mil) Creek Dr. Rear
46 C Mill Creek 943 Mil) Creek Dr. Rear
4 C Mill Creek 944 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
47 C Mill Creek 945 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
5 C Mill Creek 946 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
48 C Mill Creek 947 Mil) Creek Dr. Rear
6 C Mill Creek 948 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
49 C Mil) Creek 949 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
7 C Mill Creek 950 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
50 C Mill Creek 951 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
8 C Mill Creek 952 Milt Creek Dr. Rear
51 C Mill Creek 953 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
9 C Mill Creek 954 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
52 C Mill Creek 955 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
10 C Mill Creek 956 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
53 C Mill Creek 957 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
11 C Mill Creek 958 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
54 C Mill Creek 959 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
12 C Mill Creek 960 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
55 C Mill Creek 961 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
13 C Mill Creek 962 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
56 C Mill Creek 963 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
14 C Mill Creek 964 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
15 C Mill Creek 966 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
16 C Mil) Creek 974 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
17 C Mill Creek 976 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
18 C Mill Creek 978 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
19 C Mill Creek 980 Mill Creek Dr. Rear
35 C Mill Creek 1023 Vintner Blvd. Rear
36 C Mill Creek 1021 Vintner Blvd. Rear
37 C Mill Creek 1013 Vintner Blvd. Rear
38 C Mill Creek 1011 Vintner Blvd. Rear
39 C Mill Creek 1009 Vintner Blvd. Rear
40 C Mill Creek 1007 Vintner Blvd. Rear
41 C Mill Creek 1005 Vintner Blvd. Rear
42 C Mill Creek 1003 Vintner Blvd. Rear
43 C Mill Creek 1001 Vintner Blvd. Rear
Evergrene PCD_ 3lPage
Safe Zone Setback Exhibit
Evergrene PCD _ 4_I P a ge
Safe Zone Setback Exhibit
PARCEL #7
Evergrene PCD S�Page
Safe Zone Setback Exhibit
PARCEL #6
LOT # � BLOCKI'lETTER NEIGHBORHOOD i ADDRESS SAFE ZONE SETBACK
20 N/A Heritage Park 888 Taft Ct. Side and Rear
21 N/A Heritage Park 887 Taft Ct. Side and Rear
22 N/A Heritage Park 885 Taft Ct. Rear
23 N/A Heritage Park 883 Taft Ct. Rear
24 N/A Heritage Park 881 Taft Ct. Rear
25 N/A Heritage Park 879 Taft Ct. Rear
44 N/A Heritage Park 821 Madison Ct. Rear
45 N/A Heritage Park 819 Madison Ct. Rear
Evergrene PCD _ 6lPage
Safe Zone Setback Exhibit
PARCEL #8
LOT # 'BLOCK'LETTER NEIGHBORHOOD ' ' ADDRESS SAFE ZONE SETBACK
1 N/A Gradens Preserve 1615 Nature Ct. Rear
2 N/A Gradens Preserve 1613 Nature Ct. Rear
3 N/A Gradens Preserve 1611 Nature Ct. Rear
4 N/A Gradens Preserve 1609 Nature Ct. Rear
5 N/A Gradens Preserve 1610 Nature Ct. Rear
6 N/A Gradens Preserve 1612 Nature Ct. Rear
7 N/A Gradens Preserve 1614 Nature Ct. Rear
8 N/A Gradens Preserve 1616 Nature Ct. Rear
9 N/A Gradens Preserve 1618 Nature Ct. Rear
10 N/A Gradens Preserve 1620 Nature Ct. Rear
49 N/A Gradens Preserve 1803 Flower Dr. Rear
50 N/A Gradens Preserve 1805 Flower Dr. Rear
51 N/A Gradens Preserve 1807 Flower Dr. Rear
52 N/A Gradens Preserve 1809 Flower Dr. Rear
53 N/A Gradens Preserve 1811 Flower Dr. Rear
54 N/A Gradens Preserve 1813 Flower Dr. Rear
55 N/A Gradens Preserve 1815 Flower Dr. Rear
56 N/A Gradens Preserve 1817 Flower Dr. Rear
57 N/A Gradens Preserve 1819 Flower Dr. Rear
58 N/A Gradens Preserve 1821 Flower Dr. Rear
59 N/A Gradens Preserve 1823 Flower Dr. Rear
60 N/A Gradens Preserve 1825 Flower Dr. Rear
61 N/A Gradens Preserve 1827 Flower Dr. Rear
62 N/A Gradens Preserve 1903 Flower Dr. Rear
63 N/A Gradens Preserve 1905 Flower Dr. Rear
64 N/A Gradens Preserve 1907 Flower Dr. Rear
65 N/A Gradens Preserve 1909 Flower Dr. Rear
66 N/A Gradens Preserve 1911 Flower Dr. Rear
67 N/A Gradens Preserve 1913 Flower Dr. Rear
68 N/A Gradens Preserve 1915 Flower Dr. Rear
69 N/A Gradens Preserve 1917 Flower Dr. Rear
70 N/A Gradens Preserve 1919 Flower Dr. Rear
71 N/A Gradens Preserve 1921 Flower Dr. Rear
72 N/A Gradens Preserve 1923 Flower Dr. Rear
85 N/A Gradens Preserve 2110 Spring Ct. Rear
86 N/A Gradens Preserve 2104 Spring Ct. Rear
87 N/A Gradens Preserve 2102 Spring Ct. Rear
88 N/A Gradens Preserve 2011 Graden Dr. Rear
89 N/A Gradens Preserve 2013 Graden Dr. Rear
90 N/A Gradens Preserve 2015 Graden Dr. Rear
91 N/A Gradens Preserve 2017 Graden Dr. Rear
92 N/A Gradens Preserve 2019 Graden Dr. Rear
93 N/A Gradens Preserve 2021 Graden D. Rear
94 N/A Gradens Preserve 2023 Graden Dr. Rear
Evergrene PCD 7I P a ge
Safe Zone Setback Exhibit
TYP. LOT LAYOUTS
O 1�I� 2r
50' X 105' SINGLE FAMILY LOTS -A1-A11, At&A26", A27-A33, A37-A54,C21,C22. D7-D4, D22-D6fi, AND 089-091 65' X'120' SINGLE FAMILY LOTS - 81-B2B, C30-C34, D67-D89, E7-E2, AND F14F34
• POOL OP�IONP1 N ENCLOS�aE ' POOL OPTIONAL
"'BACK-TO�BACK'1.OTSWILLHAVETHEF�LLOWINCRENRSETBACKSATPOOt/saA,S'S �VFENCFJ�ECK ;O4E<.RORSIOE
.� R�E -e �rE.:__es�_ �„ri�.��. _�.UPE_ FENCENECKR ).5''��E .i'tAIN.w�:'
'cl.CLOd:iF =��cL..oJFe H� MIN.3'1' p51OE5CREE=/ � 5'MIN.RE4R ESCLOSIIRE
SETBNCK 6'MIN.REnR OESCREEN POOLSETBACH ET6ACK ESCLOSUW:
POOLSETBACK �E�pE�(FE SISET9ACK SET6PCK � � � �`�
10'MIN. MIN.S'1' MIN. 10' —�
p��� REPR9L0G. P�
PoOL SETBACK P� MIN.B'11' SETBACOKL POOL POOL 5�� POOI 12'MIN.
I ENGLOSIIRE I SIOESTREEf
IOEPOOL OECK ENCLOSl1RE OOtISPP/SCRE'��.
— —fi� ---- BACK ��� I I ' P SETBACK
II I 12'MIN.SIOE g�MIN.
. — I STREEf POOUSPPI SIDE POOL
I II i � SGREENSEiBACK SETBACH I � I
� � �. � �
ios Inv.
'
�
15'MIN.FRONT
BUILOINGSEIBACK 20'MIN.
�FRONT EMRY
G RAGESEiBACK
MIN. ] t MIN. 6'11'
sioee�oc. smee�oc.
SETBALK MIN.10' SEfBACK
BL�G.
�� ` I
I�a� �
zo� MiH. e�oc.
SET6PCK FROM
ENTRY GARAGE
50 TYP.
50' X 105' SINGLE FAMILY LOTS - A34-A36, C7-C20, C23-C29, C35-056, ANO OS-D2'1
• POOL OPTIONPL
�pMi^�pp 10'MIN. 10'MIN.RE4R
� r RE4R POOL � pEC1UFENCE
10' MIN.
aEna e�oc
n
SEfBACK
P�i
t2'MIN.SIOE �
sraeerPOOUSCa �i ❑ I
SCREENSETBACK I �-�.�J
� . � �� J ' �
1TMIN.SIOE I �'�"�y� MIN.10'
STREET BL�G. BL�G.
SET9ACK SEPARATII
E � � �gs
15 MIN. FRONT 20 M N BLOG.
BUIL�INGSETBACK SETBACKFRONT
20MIN. ENTRYGRRAGE
FRONTENTRY SOTYP.—
GARAGESETBACN
�
I
� II'��
— 10'U.E. �
smeer �
I�tYMIN.SiOE ��� I
LSTREETBL�G. T�T� I
I SETBACK
I �
MIN.3'1' MIN.fi'11'
;ESCREEN SIOESCREEN
'EfHACK SETBAGH ` I
� MIN.9'11' MIN.5Y'
o SIDEPOOL SIDEPOO� P
__ SEfBACK SEfBACK �
___ i �= r'
MIN. B'11'
sme e�oc.
SEfBACK 105'MIN.
112'TYP.
I MIN.t ' '
�' BLD I
SEPNRA ION
� i�
— — �� �
s� � t0'U.E.
���
�•���-�r`��
12' MIN. 20' MIN. � 12' MIN. FRO�.T BLDG. I
FRONTBUIL�ING FRONTEMRY SEiBACKFOR -�
SFfBACK GAIiAGESETBACK EMRYGNftAGE
ss•nv.
65' X 120' SINGLE FAMILY LOTS - E3-E42, F1-F73, AND F35-F49
•POOLOPTIONAL
a� sioe MIN.10'
SETBACK FOR RFAR FENCE
FENCFJ�ECK� OEGKSETBACK � �
1�'MIN.RE4R
POOLSETBPGH
MIN.10 �
REAR
I serena
POOL POOL
I ENCLOSII pECK
s• n�iH,
SI�E POOL
SETBACK
�za �
m.
I I ].5'MIN.
SIOE
SEfBACK
�
�
12'MIN� ]0'MIN. � 12'MIN.FRONT9LOG.
FftONT9l11LD}YG FftONTENTRV SEi9ACKFOR
SElBNCK\ GARAGESEIBACK ENTRVGARAGE
I65' TP. —
NCLO DE
suR
SET9NCK
' 12'MIN.
SIOESTREET
I SETBACK
-� �
� io ue.l
nP.
10'MIN.REAR
ENCLOStIRE
�ET�AC� �
�pppL I 1YMIN.
� SIOESTREE!
POOUSPPISCRE
L 1 \I �
SEfBNGK
� irmiN.
LEGEND
�BUFFERS
o�
� PARKINAY
� UPLAND PRESERVE AREA (EXISTIN(
� WETLAND AREA (EXISTING)
� WETLAND MITIGATION -AREA
COMMON AREA/OPEN SPACE
�LOTS PREVIOUSLV OESIGNATE� WITH SAFE
ZONESETBACKS
TION MAP
Not to Scale
SITE DATA
ZONING, EXISTING PCD
, UNDERLYING RL-3
LAND USE, EXISTING RM
SECTION 36 TOWMSHIP 41S RANGE 42E
TOTAL SITE AREA 85. 33 AC
DWELLING UNITS 320 DU
65'x120', SINGLE FAMILY 146 DU
50'X105', SINGLE FAMILV 174 DU
GROSS DENSIN, PERMIT�ED UP TO 9 DU/AC
PROPOS12D (320 DIVIDED BY 85.33) 375 DU/AC
LOTCOVER4GE,PERMITT°D 35%
65'X120' =;'ROPOSED (MAX.) 45 %
50'X105' ;'ROPOSED(MAX.) 45%
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT, P�=RMITTED 36'
Pf•OPOSED 36'
RIGHT-OF-WAY 15.09 AC (18 % )
PERVIOUS AREA . 38.06 AC (45 % )
OPEN SPACE, REQUIRED 29.Bfi (35%)
PROPOSED 39.O5AC(46%)
UPLAND P 2ESERVE 7.87 AC (9 %)
WETLAND �RESERVE 2.62 AC (3 % )
�,q�(E 1.90 AC (2 % )
LAKE MAI�TENANCE EASEMENT 123 AC (1 %)
OTHER 3.10 AC (4 % )
PARKING, REQUIRED 1 SP/PER BEDROOM
PROVIDED (On �ach individual lot) 1 SP/PER BEDROOM
SETBACK C�iARTS
NP. 65' X 720' SINGLE FFMILY LOTS
BUILDING POOIJSPA DECK/SCREEN FENCE
ENCLOSURE
FRONTSETBACK: z0' N/A N!A N/A
FRONT ENTRV GARAGE
FRONT SETBACK: BLDG./ 12' N/A N!A N/A
SIDE ENTRY GAR4GE
SIDE SETBACK 7.5' 9' � 7.5' 0'
SI�ESTREET t2� 12' 12' 10'
SETBACKS
REARSETBACK �0' s• 3' o•
TYP. 50' X 105' S W GLE F{MILY LOTS
BUILDWG POOL/SPA �ECK/SCREEN FENCE
ENCLOSURE
FRONTSETBACK: z0' NIA N/A NIA
FRONT ENTRY GAR4GE
FRONTSETBACK: BLDG. �5' N/A N/A NIA
� SI�E ENTRY GAR4G[
SIDE SETBACK 3'1"I6'11" 5'1"/B'11" 3'1"/6'11" 0'
SIDESTREET 12, �2, �z, ��,
SE7BACKS
REARSE76HCK �0' T"/S 5"'/3' 0"'/0'
" Waiver request only applinhle to bts with a"back-to-back" condifion, Al2-A26
J � LAND�\��f//
i DESIGN 9i
SOUTH �I ►
1a U.E.
im. o, � -Li . �. �.
REVISIONS TO THE SITE PLAN PREPARED BV LAND
�ESIGN SOUTH. ORIGINAL PLAN PREPNRE� BY OTHERS.
REV44104112
REV04/ttli2
� REVa5l�9/12
NOTES
• STREETLIGHTS (0) ARE 50' ON CENTER, ON ALTERNATE STREET SIDES,
FINAL LOCATIONS TO BC PROVIDED 8Y ELECTRIC ENGINEER AN� TO 8E
FIELD ADJUSTED AS NE'�ESSARY.
• PARCEL BOUNDARY PR.IVIDED BY CARNAHAN, PROCTOR, & CRO55, INC.
• ALL LAND AREAS WITHI�, 150' OF THIS SITE ARE ZONED AS NOTED AND
HAVE A FUTURE LAND l3E DESIGNATION AS NOTED ON PLAN.
• THE SEPAR4TION OF TF._ PROPOSED STREET TREES, LIGHTING AND
HOMES FROM SEACOA: f UTILIN AUTHORIN LINES IS SUBJECT TO THE
REVIEW AND APPROVA.OF SEACOAST. L4NDSCAPING SHALL BE FIELD
ADJUSTED TO AVOID CuNFLICTS WITH UTILITIES.
.A MINIMUM 15' SETBAC[ WILL BE MAINTAINED FROM SEACOAST LINES.
. ALL STOP BARS AND Sio� LOCATIONS TO BE CERTIFIED BY PROJECT
ENGINEER.
. STOP BAR WILL BE WHI'E PAVERS OR THERMOPLASTIC ON ASPHALT.
• FOR SINGLE FAMILY, M.ILBOXES WILL BE PROVIDED ON EVERY LOT, AS
APPROVED BY THE U.S POSTAL REGULATIONS.
� STRUCTURES CAN BE �LP.CED ANYWHERE ON EACH LOT, PROVIDED THAT
ALL MINIMl1M SETBACI�; ARE MAINTAINED AS DEFINED THEREIN.
• CURBING DETAILS TO f[ SHOWN ON ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION PLANS.
SEE ENGINEERING PL'r��S FOR ROADWAY CROSS SECTIONS.
. ALL SIGNAGE WILL BE I':aRT OF A SEPARATE APPROVAL.
•SURROUNDING PARCE.INFORMATION AND PLANS ARE SHOWN FOR
.INFORMATIONAL PURK�SES ONLY.
SHOWN FOR BLOSICING OUT PARCEL PLAT NUMBERING.
� O
WAIVERS F.�QUESTED
- Section 78-141, Table 10, i' [he City Code to allow for a 12' side street setback for lhe
builtling, pools and screen andosures wi[hin the 65' wide bts. RL3 zoning dishid
calls for a 20' side street sAback
- Section 78-141, Table 10, �f the City Code [o allow a 5' rear setback for pools and a 3'
rear setback for screen endnsures within the 65' wide lots. RL-3 zoning disMct
calls for a 10' rear sel6ack
- Section 78-141 Table 10, R the City Code to allow 45 % maximum lot coverage for ihe
65' wide lots. RL-3 zoninpi�shict calls for a maximum 35 % lot coverage. .
- Section 78-141, Table 10, Jity Code to allow for a 50' wide lot. RL-3 zoning
dis[ric[ calls for a 65' wide �t.
- Secfion 78-747, Table 10, �F the City Code to allow for a minimum 5,250 s.fJot area fc
the 50' wide lots. RL-3 zo�ing disiricl calls for a minimum lot area of 6,500 s.f.
- Seclion 78-141, Table 10,�f the Ciry Code to allow for a 3Y "/6'11" side setback for
buildings; a 5'1"/8'1'I" sidraetbackfor pools; and a 3'1"/6'11"side setback screen/
endosures wilhin the 50' vde lots. RL-3 zoning district calls for a 7.5' side setback.
- Saction 78-041, Tabie 10,�f the City Code to allow a 5' rear setback for pools (7' for
back-to-6ack condtions) a� a 3' rear setback for screenlenclosures (5' for back-fo-back
conditions) withm the 50' I Is. Rl3 zoning dislnct calls for a 10' rear setback.
- Sechon 78-741, Table 10 �'the City Code to allow for a 12 side sVeet setback for
bmldings, pools and scre� enclosures within the 50' wide lots. RL-3 zoning tlisirict
calls for a 20'side street slback.
- Section 78-741, Tahle 10,0( Ihe City Code to allow for a maximum 45 % lot coverage for
the 50' wide lots. RL3 zai�g distric[ calls for a 35 % maximum lot coverage.
- Section 78--041 - Waiver o allow the issuance of building pertnits for dry models
pnortothe recordation ofhe plat �
- Seclion 78-506 - Waiver i� &I!ow sidewalks on one-side of the road.
- Section 783�6 Q) - Waiver to eliminate 10' Safe Zone Setback.
urban
des� n
Sfl.l O
Urban Planning & Design
Landscape Architecture
Communication Graphics
The Lofts at City Place
477 S. Rosemary Avenue, Sui[e 225
West Palm 8each, FL 33401-5758
561.366.1100
Fax 561.366.1111
Email CAD@udsonline.com
coar�em ,
ai maa:, ae:ie�. a�npemen�s, end pians '-
r^are���eenyaiserew;�eareow�aaey i
a d�ha pmperty ol ��e eesigner, entl were
aiea m� ina e.�w:�re �:e orme:aaue_a
pmjetl.Thesaidees,tleslgns,arrangemenls I
or plans st�all ro� be uutl by, or dlstlosetl
any peron, firm, or coryoretlon wll�oul
II�ew1ltlenpertnlssionofNetlesigner. �
JoG Numbe� P.M. SP
suemittaioa�s oaw�ey
0].13.01 �2A.A. SHG ,
U9.16.01 SHG Oi �3AA SHG i
�901 SHG 11.1].03 BR �
11.OB01 SHG 11.i6.O5AA SHG
o.oi sr+c
113601 SHG
01.140t SNG
SHG
03.06.02RA SHG ,
�^'
W
.�
W
� `; i r
L ' 1
O �
� �
� tii
� � �
� (� �
� V �
-� N
� � \
� �
� � W
� � L
W��
W.. _ C%� \\,
Scale: 1" = 200'-0" �}�
o ioo• sao� °��� V�'���,.
_��� �
} r �
Sheet 1 of 6 "'�:� �"
/ /.
�11NG;,;;.
LAND
DESIGN
SOUTH � , „ �,,.�.,
f� �� �: P�� e �
, ,,,.
E- , � ,� r P � � , - � • c —5a°ss o3
x�: � z I �' .
� f � �. �A 5�71 ZONING,EXISTWC - PCD
_ �
REVIS�ONS TO SITE PLAN PREPARED BY LAND DESIGN i �' f-'---�--�_ - �-'-- --���---�---� -- �� �
SOUTH.ORIGINAL PLAN PREPARED BY OTHERS. �� � ' �` �
� " O.S. , UNDERL`dNG - RL-3 ��
� iga,' RU'"' ` --.---- ' \4p\ LAND USE, EXIST�:IG RM
REV 04/04/�2 � i kt, � -----� SECTION 36 TOWNSHIP 415 RANGE 42E �� �
REV 04/11/12 �F£,
REV 05/OS/12 �. i r��"', E R 65 1� � TOTAL SITE AREA 74.977 AC Ur6an Plannin & Desi n
� DWELLING UNITS 50' x 105', 1& 2-STORY, SINGLE FAMILY) 74 DU 9 9
, �f E B p�_ . _ _ , . LandscapeArchitecture
o i� " O ro� 28' GROSS DENSITY, ?ERMITfE� UP TO 9 DU/AC
�- o N p �n o� •\O.S.•.:`- PROPOSED (74 DIVIDED BY 14.977} 5.0 DU(AC Communication Graphics
f�=/22 6. � � � � : / `J ' � � q� °� `r � " N �n LME P . - -. � LOT COVERA,GE, f�ERMITTED (MAX.) 35 % 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd.
i i ��' `' � - � � � M `- � � � E � � d tROPOSED (MAX.) q5 % Suite fi00 The Concourse
.CA=63°30'13" ; / �R53� 66 . �� n ^ n r� 5 ' WestPalmBeach,FL33409-6582
�+ � � O �� ��o �:. BUIL�ING HEIGHT PERMITTED (MAX.) 36'
y��j L=250.49�I ;,% ��_;�"� , O� N 4 C,q-7��,a-' PARCEL7 PROPOSED(MAX.) 3fi' 5s7.ees.o05s
il R=15.00� Fax561.fi69.0551
O� `'� / /��, r� ^ I I Q = f j E j_ 0 9�`- Email CAD@udsonline.com
/ v::/ ' �o� .� I-L=15.43'
U.E. Q U l RIGHT-OF-WAY 3.17 AC (15 %)
�a �, .4<� �� �i . % 6� '� 28' LM.� �. CA=58°56'03" � PERVIOl1S AREA 7.765AC (52%) \
• �/i , lJ� � � � 0 ca0 (j �\ � �'� IMPERVIOUSAREE 7212AC(48%) �� a�a�
� / O / _S AO . � B�artengemml;endP-ans
\ j'-ALLEI' 5' SIDEW K / � l, reprecenladbylM1Stlrsmngaremmedby
G � / I � AVER7 �' � F a�au�c�o�rooru,ee�y�..am�,<
� J��;r�E�, ' �+Q S VP �cp ♦ 4�� v� ��`.ri,P €R� OPEN SPACE, RECLOR_D (Excludes Right-0f-Way) 4.13 AC (35%) �,��ro�mea.a�ga��a�ne�ara
�. E � Y'm ��... • V V � i P� PRCPOSED . v�rea meu uoa� x:� ��,�
U t � ,JO' � � � 50' ROADWAY, DRAIN E, � SAFE SI T� i ��� orpia�ssn�i�oiee�smby,aeisaa�e
--S&9°30'SS��E 2i.21�waTER,SEWERAND ����- �T �;��.. COMMONAREA 1.84AC(16%) �oa�y�.�o��,���
(' "TYP. -- � TRIANGLE, TYP ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS 5.46 AC (46%) mewanao�m�oiu�o���.
R40' � � /' � � � i UT111 iY EASEAIEN7 - � *
7yp. �� .= � ��� � ,:i ` � - EVERCReNE vtai o,,3�♦ . ^ CROSSWAI�Y( - � ,j.r TOTAL(ExcludesRight-0RWay) 7.32AC(62%) �QyNUmbar �smo.�< P.M.S=
�' "� � -` , , � cp (P.B. 95, PG. 2 � 'ct S BARAN .
"�\ - 69 '�` C� STOP 1fY . -'' �! � PARKWG, REQUIR-0 1 SPlPER BE�ROOM
// ,�(� � Fj � R�F:fF'� �iY� � � 10' '� \\ '�� `<� suomittaioa�� oa»,�ey ,.u�.o�..a.�.�sanr,w,��.mc�.�..�n
/ 3 ' / - � \ ♦ �•'� . t'0, PROVICSD (On each individual lot) 1 SP/PER BEDROOM o,oem sn�
5 6� � i '� �.. b vF 6,4P1 iGN� ��P / �' U.E 132' f'�� .�♦ HEADER f�?U i i'�.� OS � Y�� azzim sxc
�(�� I_� -G,i° � �'� ./�9� I �/,'�� �J 5 / �� , azim sHc
MP-'fYP ` \ <, �STREEL\PIT. � ��' � �P\ � , / . ! jyp,��n/� o�z.oi sn� nr.=oaR.nicau,mENrs
CJ�OSSW K �.5 ';'�.�:N ��� �O 0 � / 56' � �IVI\ ` - *'Lotspreviouslydesignatedwithsafe
. � �
` NP. � . /^j � ��-� 11��.. b. . . i� * ��. �� zone setbacks.
ROADWAY, INAGE, WA R. ,' \ � . O �1j� `� � / . `�. .
,,SEWER UTILITY EASEME ?9.Q_0D , C'� �3'b"' L=4 .9 ,} /� GP �4�• �+ 50' \\ i� � �!� 1. .
EVERGRENE PLAi TV/ �_ � '� .. Q- ��. 9�j r�Cl� Tn'. � � � �, : l� - . � .
t�
(P.9. 95. PG. 29) � R ti 6� 49 \;-X ' � M �� .
72 ,�. �P- ,�� , � ,05� 4 : � :
15' DRAINAG - - i �
EASEMENT - J' � "--' ' -"' - 105' - � I, ,v.J �� � � � 7YP. . �� .
i AA
`5�,� 50' 7YP. �n1�'o 1� � � LIEY �y� r� �
o, nP. 73 x�� 6�05' ,� 50 �� R. 43 ,' ,\ '`;,
� `L. . / . �Z � � \ ,��! .. lY . ;< �. ./.
�Z � ; 51 � ; 3, :. ,�.
� � 74 �� /% M � �.E. ,. 1
� � . TREETLIGHT, P.T l/ i f
� � �� �� 52 ,,' 42 ;,' '� ��
�� ,�� • 5 / M , 1 f �
� - . �� �/ / / i ����'�
��
, � . � � :� 5 WALK, L�. . i
1 '
��� . . 'YPIC � . ,l
�- . . '105'� '� � .
JX .
- - ..: : .. �. I 10'UE' '�� �20' . '10 E. .�..�.�-. : �. _. . . .�. .. r . � ... .. � �.
'
..:._- _-_.-..-,�_- ..
` TvP / ; �.� � =' -rr 4��i r , /, /%� �,` ,�
�: \ :: � >; �� - ;i! -C � . ��: i jr; �� k '`;�,; 'ti � . °��
� � rJr-'J "�% �ji �-- \ � �e=sos.00' I ; ,� � ` ''� •s..
28� . �� �. ,/ � ,os� 39 . ca=28°2s°s�°° � � ���
LAKE �-��.�, 5a� , \P. � L=25 i . 19 � ; , �, o
'�� 56 nP- / 38 ��.� ; i LL
4.84 AC � . �
���, '�, VACLE 37 .• LAKE ;, P�.� vi
, �25� ��'� � ��nER. 36 � � i I .
_ ;,,�,. /,, nP. 1.67 AC. � b � a
�, 57 ; , sTaPBAa 35 �. ��' R=a.s.00' � �{E.
� � TOP 25� - _ —� CA=127°54'53" i //�� � �
R=455.00' - .. ♦ SSWALI�� - : SI6 . P. W.M.M.E.� j I � � �
__:► ,- � ° ✓'�O.S.t �L=107.16' 2a' ,
CA=62°35'17" 58 �: 5, � �p LM.E. �
L=497.03' �. �' , p� a� W.M. E. ,. N24S3 R=48.00, rvP. i � ° p' � rn �
LEGEND . ; 3 � �'�� j 99�� ¢ F CA=56°i9°os„ ; I . o� N. �e 2. �.�
; 59 , .\�.S.i :� 34 50� L-47. i8° � i ,a 9�z ti ' � L��
�euFFeas �STRETLIGHT, � ,^,` NP' i 6' * _ �/�
� T Y P. i I ;�,o��.E.� � 3 3 z N O 1° 19' 26"E 136.81' � �,* 5 0' � �� V J
\ �% / � �`� ..I TYP. ^'
�UPLANDPRESERVEAREA(EXISTING) N - � I ' � ` `�� � � � 3L � ����°' � I i .� ... � 23 22 56 � W �
, , 3 � 105�
6O ' i i �� \\ �` I- VAL EY � m�
� yyETLANU AREA (EXISTING) �� � — � O . 2 5 I 24 GU ER, 10� /� ^
V.E. i T---105' . .. Q Q Q I� � 127' � :P. U.E; G I �
P D.CDSSING I � �� `� 70 ��J �V 27 "� 26 . �- ��-- - _ ---
�2AVERS S�N,TYP. i ' _ � `.r E. `` VALLEY �'15 245 � I i-.I - -- i - \ � U
4 � O.S. \ ��', Gl1TTER, ATE i
28� f 6� i , � � `� ��� \ �\ i �' ('' '2N � � / � � ..
GOMMONAREA/OPENSPACE T'yp • � I IL�� TYP'GUTTER. I � � �� '--_ __' ___'_' ______ ______�EASEM NT -- — 5 1 / .i1EAP - n ^
VALLEY � ` TYP. LINE I - R20' �a-� �
� QRCSWALK � �� J'�- - TYR I \ -- U E J I/ / \ r GC � � 1.i� IrL
� i - � 105' SD, 5Q' �O l/106'� OS. 'i SE .
� R20' 5' -.+� 10' U.E. � TYp�+ 1 � � /
cv n�7 � �R30' U.E. ;t45' � ' / V TYP. W� - —STEEE.T_LI HT. - — - -- - - �. R3 \. . ./ ' � .
° "� 15 � � � I i I �:.:. ,. � ��_- TvP � - —z �-.- --� � TYP � --
-�---- `\ �� � R30' i.
/
LOCATION MAP M '�=� P�-e.s�.�`"RZ � ;' 7 � ��--__ — ;o ` =o°� e ;
NottoScale or �+ i / I � � '----- ---- ----- ----- -- - -STGNTVF � -,--- i .,��.
�� V� .�o ^ � �06�__ � ( C OSSWALK i ,, ---- -� o ' . . � . � . � �q' k n�_i�''�,�- ��..
D" B _ -r---105'TYP. —
� ..— . � O --- - � `i � O 105 � 50 I 1 . . . . �,>\
i
� TYP. 113' TYP.-'� '. � Q I� �d�
� :___6,�8� �-----, ;--- �.� �.5. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 � 18 ,�5'19 �/�! Scale: 1•=50�_0• -� =�r�.� ,�
12'N.P.6.C.I.D.ACCESS �-� � � � ' p 25' S6 t�. 'IO���r�e8 7�
� . -� �� EASEMENT '� - �_- /h
��' � * � F� �- t i ■ _
1 � ■ ais �b� -
� i , / � % .:.��'"
/— �.` � , l / � ' Sheet 1 of 2
f�` —y- �f. -- _/_ _<.. , / / � , // %% � � ,
HEADER CURB DETAIL
�+8� Not to Scale
TYR�. "D" CURB DETAIL TYP. PAVER DETAIL
Not to Scale Not to Scale
I 6 —'%2•PatlWeTyp.
i �
g,
�._6.
�. ` . �w
k—e'--�
2' VALLEY GUTTER DETAIL
Not to Scale
3/4" RlN.
C�P�)
_`� n � < <L, .., �
1Y 1z^
za^
HEAQER CURB
(SEE DETAIL)
°w
SETBACK CHARTS TYP. LOT LAYOUT FOR PARCEL 6
TYP. 50' X 105' SINGLE FAMiLY LOTS
50' X 105' SINGLE FAMILY LOTS
° WAIVER REQUESTED.
#Lot 5 Only.
Lots 2, 3 and b will have a 8.5' rear setback for pool/spa and 7.5' rear setback
for decWscreen enclosure.
.�
_./
105'
TYP.
3' MIN. REAR
ENCLOSURE/
POOL
- ENCLASURE acien�n�
5 MIN. REAR FENCE
POOLSETBACK �ECK
10' MIN
\ PODL REAR BL�C
� _ SETHACK
J I �
1 II
II
MIN. 3'1"
SI�E BLOG.
� SETBAGK MM.10'
� e�o�.
1 �
I
—_—r _— _ti--_—_
i AVER BRICKS
1 1/4" COMPACTED
�AND
`2" FLUSH HEADER
;URB TYP. WHERE
?AVER BRICKS
�BUT DISSIMILAR
°AVEMENT SECTION
3° SHELLROCK
;ASE
2" STABILIZED
SUBGRADE
ENCLOSIJftE
MIN, 3'1" � MIN.6'17" ENCLOSURE
)E SCREEN SIOE SCREEN �
�E-�gq� ��L�� SETBACK
10' SIDE
�—�� MIN.51" PaQ� �EETFENCE
P�� MIN.t11'`I- SI�EPOOL � S�a�
�SIDEF)OL�—�! SE7BACK 1
MIN6YP
SIOEILOG.
SETJ�CK
2U' MIN. BLOG. I' � STIiEE
t5 MIN. FROM SETBACK FRONT �
BUILDIN60RSIOE ENTRYGARAGE
ENTRY GARAGE , 50' TYP. —
SEfeACK
t E. _�_—�--
12' MIN. SIDE
iTREEf POOIJSPAI
SCREENSETBACK
12' MIN. SIDE
iT12EET 9L�G. .
SE7BACK
�
NOTES
• STREER.IGHTS (N� ARE 150` ON�CENTER, ON AL7ERNATE STREET SIDES,
FINAL LOCATIONS TO BE PROVIDED BY ELECTRIC ENGINEER ANO TO BE
FIEL� ADJUSTED AS NECES:�ARY.
� PARCEL BOUNDARY PROVIDED BY KESHAVARZ & ASSOCIATES.
� ALL LAND AREAS WITHIN 150 OF THIS SITE ARE ZONED AS NOTED AN�
HAVE A FUTURE LAND USE OESIGNATION AS NOTED ON PLAN.
� ALL BUILOINGS WILL HAVE A MINIMUM 15' SETBACK FROM SEACOAST lINES
UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. �
• STOP BAR AN� CROSSWALK,i WIIL BE WHITE PAVERS OR THERMOPLASTIC
ON ASPHALT. .
• FOR SINGLE PAMILY, MAILBCXES WILL BE PROVIDED ON EVERY LOT, AS
APPROVED BY THEU.S: POSTAC REGULATIONS.
� STRl1CTURES CAN BE PLACED ANYWHERE ON EACH LO7, PROVIDED THAT
ALL MINIMUM SETBACKS ARE MAINTAINED AS OEFINED THEREIN.
• CURBING AND�RAMP DETAIL:i ARE SHOYJN ON ENGINEERING PLANS. �
• SEE ENGINEERING PLANS FGR ROADWAY CROSS SECTIONS.
• ALL SIGNAGE ARE PART OF A SEPARATE APPROVAL.
• SURROUNDING PARCEL INPORMATION AND PLANS ARE SHOWN FOR
INFORMATIONAL PURPO5E5 ONLY.
• WILI PROVIDE NEEDEO FIRE RATED WALLS AND WINDOW
PLACEMENTlTYPE FOR REDUCED SETBACK TO MEET BUILOING CODE
REQUIREMENTS.
• ALL REGULATORY SIGNAC�E S 60NCEPTUAL ONLYAND SUBJECTTO
REVIEW BY7HE PROJECT EMGINEER AND APPROVAL BYTHE PERMITING
AGENCIES.
WAIVERS RE�QUESTED
- Section 78-141, Table 10, of thr. Clty Code to allow for a maximum 45 % lot coverage.
RL-3 zooing district calls for a 3i % ma�cimum Iot coverage.
- Secfion 78-141, Tahle 10, of tfu� City Code to allow for a 12 side street sefback for
buildings, pools and screen/enclosures/decks for Lot 5. RL-3 mning disfict
calis for a 20' side sVeef setbacK. -
- Sectiun 7&141, Tabie iq of fhe Cdy Code to allow a 5' rear setback far pools/spa and a
3' rear setback for screen/enclosuresldecks. RL3 zoning district cails for a
10' rear setbadc.
- Seclian 7&141, Tabie 10, of N�� Cily Code to albw for a 3'P/6'N"side setbeck for
buildings; a 5'1"/8'1T side setbackfor poWs; and a 3'1%6'11" side setbadc screeN
enclosures/decks wfthin ihe 50' wide IoGS. RL-3 zoNng district calis for a 7.5'side setbeck.
- Section 7&141, Table.l0, City Code to allow for a 50' wide lot. RL-3 zoning distriG
calls fur a 65'vride lot �
- Section 7&141, Ta61e 10, City Code io allow for a minfmum 15' front set6ack for buiiding
and sitle eMry garages and 20' fint setback for fioM entry gareges. RL� mning district
calls for a 25 front setback:
- Section 78-141, Table 10, Ciry Code to aliow for a minimum 5,250 s.f. Lot area. RL3
zoning disbict calis for a minimum btarea of 6,500 s.f.
- Section 78-441 - Waiver to allcw Ne issuance of.6uilding permiLS for dry models
r(or to the recordation of ihe plit.`
- Section 78-216 �) - Waiver to eliminate 10' Safe Zone Setback.
LAND
DESIGN
SOUTH
e � � r hlf f
- � Eme t isn_..,...,,<,,.b..,,..�..
REVISIONS TO MODIFY SETBACK CH3lRl3`
PREPARED BY LAND DESIGN SOUTH.ORIGINAL PLAN
PREPARED BY OTHERS.
- REV 04/04/12 REV 04/11/12 REV 05/OS/12
u n
��� �
stu o
Urban Plarining & Design
Landscape Architecture
Communication Grephics
2000 Palm Beach takes Blvd.
Suite 600 The Concourse
West Palm Beach, FL 3340&6582
sst.sas.00sa
Fax 567.689.0551
Email CADQutlsonline.com
Copy1i9M
All Weas,designs, a�nBemenk, antl plans
re�nma ey ms are-.n�e a� o�aa or
a�e u� vmaarti' ama a���, �a were
crea�mrar�na e�v.e �n otmesaa�e
pmiact mese aoas, ms�a..:. aeanae�ran�
o�a��s�+�i�otee��eaexo�aado�oa
m �r aa�,. �,. o� �omoree� w�mo��
u�wrinen pwm:sson orma de�en�.
.IObNUmbe� 190]0.10 P.M.SG
sudninelomas orawney
010603 SHO
p221.03 SHG
oa.zi.oa sHc
r
�
�
�L
�
�
� �
� � r��
� � VJ
� � �
�
� �' �
� � �
� � �
/ � �
W LL LL
Scala: AS NOTED
Sheet 2 of 2
SITE DATA LO���TION MAP U��
ZONING, EXISTING Pco Not to Scale ��I �
ZONING, UNDERLYING RL-3
LAND USE, EXISTING RM
SECTION 36 TOWNSHIP 415 RANGE 42E
TOTAL SITE AREA 2�-�54 AC � O
DWELLING UNITS (50' x'105', 2STORY, SINGLE FAMILY) 105 DU ' / ' ' ' ' ' ' _ - — _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �
GROSS DENSIN, PERMITTE� UP TO 5 �U/AC � ' -v O v O
PROPOSED (105 DIVIDED BY 27.154) 3.87 DU/AC C _' � - �, , 0 � Urbao Planning & Design . .
LOT COVERAGE, PERMITTE� 35 % � \ . . . _ . . . �� /,�: . . . . . � • � . • . � � . � . � . Landscape Architecture � -
PROPOSED (MAX.) aei _I�- 60 � . ;i ' . /.' . ' . ' . ' . ' . ' . ' . ' . " . _ . ' . ' � ' . � Communication Grephics
MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT, PERMITTE� 3s' STATIO / '/� " � 2000 Palm Beach Lakas Blvd.
PROPOSED �' 80/ . . . . ' � - � ( Suite 600 The Ca�course �
�� !- �� �• ' � West Palm Beach, FL 334�9�6582
RIGHT-OFWAY 4��9A�(»�) � � � ' �MEANDERING � � �/'� • � 561.689.O�6fi
PERVIOUS AREA (excmaes waht�oaway) 15.434 AC (57 % ) � � � / . PATM ' O � - - _ O �
IMPERVIOUS AREA �ecuuaes aiem�or-way) 6.93 AC (26%) '/ � y q/� _ _ _ _ Farz 561.689.0551
J � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Il � / , � � � � � � � . � � . � � � � � � � - 0 Email CAD@udsonline.wm .
.///. �. �. �.�. �. �.�. �. �..�Vy�/�. .�. . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' _ _ �
OPENSPACE,REQUIRED(ExcludesRigh4of-Way) 7.83AC(35%) LEG�ND =S�� ��. • ZONE:PCD � � � � � � � � co��/'. � _ _-_ - _ O
PROPOSED(ExclutlesRigh4of-Way) 16.67AC(75%) . rtIANG S,''�-�� LUP:RM3� v�/ �� O� copy�m �
UPLAN�PRESERVE �.aonc�s�� . ' � � rvP. � � � � ' . . . . /. o .� �,..►PLAND � • • A��beas,�;a�Aa��aama��,a�damm �
c � .� UPLAND PnaaoE� / _ — -- _ � • - - • - o P�PBM��eo�a�a.,�dwa�
LAKEIW�TLANDMITIGATIONAREA 3.40AC 15% �BU�FERS P Rs / - - � , F���ESERV - - . . . _ _ � a��a"�atymmarexi,�aremmmq
IAKEMAINTENANCEEASEMENT 2.04AC(9k) '. ��' � .r PRESERVE � BOUND`�" . °�a'�`°"M1eBNC°y�°�"��°�' .
♦ \ \ . . . .•.•. . .•. qensshellrotbeusetlbYarastlosetl
( ) � — — — ' .. � / • • � banYParson fifm orm � arraiqemen5 -
COMMON AREA 026 AC 1% � ,i '� pm�ect.These aaes a
ONIN�IVIDUALLOTS 9.67AC(44%) ��,��OPRESERVEAREAEXISTING � J . � ,�/ � �O � � •j/(/�y-�/�K��Q mew"ne"pemaavu"°ru„ang�dr.
( ) OA /. I� � _ ma��ionwnnou�
PARKING, REQLIIRED 7 SP/PERBE�ROOM t� � y �� s �O�r �� .: � Q• '*� g g � 72 , V W I• iF'kl V
PROVIDED (On each individual lot) 1 SPIPER BEDROOM �� � yi. 9g SS "'ST' � D �, ` �� � � p 110' - - �t �� •�� • - - - - - • . . � �% aoo Hw�,wr. isom n p.M,�_
Q 9 sti�.. �� 6(� �t53' 28'iME- . . _ . . . . . ��xwrw�mvr�w,w�xv�srr���o.,�.r�.av
Wf:7LANDAREA(EXISTING) 4�' / i? �% 6 7 - ��� � Q
� Lois previously designated with safe � � � /'6'S� � � � �� 66 _. nP . L36 - � - --. .' ,° s am�io �� ore",�ar
zone setbacks. / '� 6F� -- --�.•' ^ a 50`.* - L•24 •,L38 - oa aoz �r"�:
�'y � o�.»as sws.
� �Pf�:�E�4S .� /� � -� * ' 1'10' . , � - -- R45' `P' :�LZrJ ( --. . . �
j� � �� L�J �J] Q� O8�@ SHG
a • � ,r 64 � .: .�._ • ' • D -n m
/ � •-. ' , . * � . ' � —�ao� os. i �i�Q • - - - R � -�I
C:MMONAREAlOPENSPACE �'� /"
�[� 63 ��� ------
LAND � � Q'_-,� --- 1. '" L; L41'z.n��
. � ''. i 50 ', .' —1 �o� ,' . G? �
DESIGN '' *62 � ���. ' "'"� ~'� __ _� '.��'�o
� 70� ias, O
SOUTHp hi t _ ` , '`� 63 ! E. �� 50TYP. I��',I�C O
'� � y, �°-':`� � 76 TM� 74 � s��
E��,�� , r F � h �
.. .s " ,.: � r
�_ ,.�. !t...s � ,. ��..'. i p � 5 � / � . ,\` J ' /!�• 77 �� 28�;P'E� .�.� �V. 0 � �
R E V I S I O N S T O S I T E� P L A N P R E P A R E D B Y L A N D D E S I G N _ y /*\�. g �
SOUTH.ORIGINAL PLAN PREPARED BY OTHERS. �� 6�� \ ''ST�P BAR! 78 �� O� O �
so' O
REV 04/04/'12 � � � STOP SIGN 'fYP � � �%
REV 04/11/12 �� *.. 69 �?� - 0' �� . 50' �
� % �, � / � c� i i� ,� ��'•. ` 77 28' L.M.E. � � p? TvP. �� .
' REVOS/OS/12 / y� � ��.�. � � \`)O . i�! � \R \ %�� OS. . . . TYP. � OJ Q4 �
• �, � . .'.. .:. ; \ ` \ �
. . .� . /�J. .�. . . . .� % , � , _-,, � _ . .
�� �" ��' \ O'Q
` � ;'a r \\ - \ ��. o
. . . . . i � "�� * $*' 5�10 ��/�;�/8 � __ \ �"�� _ �1 i. —�' �:�,-� ,�> „�
. . . . . . . � ��, . _' � � o' � :-. ,
� / ............ .�_- . . �� % ` 57 '�p i, qg ` �_ _, o.W. �..,, . � �a � o o� _,�
/. �// ' . . _ . d ' / � �* . �:r j / � �'�..� \\ , � 7e5 pjl O � � •� .
� ' 56 'o��E �F ��, o
� � ' '�����I�' to"' ° i :� n'P ! - ` � ��'; ` ` � � os. O O b �
S�W,�, , �� 4.7 �59. `.� o.s. �/ b
j� -•�-�, • - •---.y-. ,' 55 „�. ;.-• ,�' ,. , `- 7g50 ��� R45� ; � oJ-,
' � � � so� ^�+ i �' `�� na.' o/ ^ � � 1' �
/�,' '•'.'•'.'.' ' �. �l STRE� LIGHT. �10U.EN'TYP `tV \ / 105 � �`��,.., � ��\ � / .��_� R53�. � Q �
/ ..... . . / * - TYP .:;: � � NP. \ �/ .;�\"� \ _� ....
� 5 �` 5�"� � ,'` ' 45 / 104 ' `.�. ��_.. . % ' *�+ *: o �' Vj
/ � % 105' ' � '• V V �
T - - • - '� 53 � `; ' / � 44 E. '��., a, i � � ,z� ` 85 ° � �
.- ;� ,';` / 43 1 �3� .. , o.E. � ob � �
j . . .�. . * ;. �,va5 L1�KE �02 , �_.,. ✓ ' *87 ,o� �b� � �
/. � ' ' ,�. ./,/ � O, j'�� A /�P. \\ `: � . . � �-E � � L :V
T`
� 52 ;% ;, ,.
�� : : • . � os. \ .
/ . - ••- : � - —
� 1 � / � . �.. ri �� 8'L.M.E. Z.O AC. 101 `��`. �� t -UPLAND � n, ��i�
' / � ♦3 7� � �\ . . . �/. J D.E i�a• i��� . �!,' 4� 50 7vP. \ \ � �� \` - PRESERV � V� V �
^ . . . . .
�:,/�'�{ ?a' - ° � / � i,' m, `� \ .,�.;<° �� - �O
%+�/r// D.E. - R53'� ,` 105' � � �/.J /� 1o'u.E '' � � .
/ NP � � . � �j� � � � 50' 7 i � � rva. 4.� 28' D.E. `� .`' � \\ 110' � �, �
1
�.�. �� I . . 'J l TP:� j' i � L.M.E � � `� .� O � .�
l i .� �i � . rn
/ � I� 10'U.E. �!�`l ` \ �� I��� * - ��� � � , r� . 28'L.M.E. ` 1 q ��O � � 1 � � i. �p �to ��� � � � Vd
' .. � 1YP. / I� R45' 50' � 1� � 50� �' I� �; 39 NP , � 2 JO r�n / �� 1 1�TYP. . U9 D.E � � ( t
7
/ ,, - _ ' % .'"` � ; M '' M D.E. G`� �, : ; � , � � i� � M
� V6J
� 'S�s�oEw�K, � o.s. ��Toa°sr'a°s° ' ;`( ,32� , � M 'M � M M M q � � 99 ','�_ o°� :, � p�,
�� � . � TYP. 1 . , ' � �: ; ` ' S7oa snw 105' JZ 1 � � - - - - R53' -� ' �� * 90 � . e � ,+L
' *5 � RZO ••� , �=505.00� � . zo� �� 37 36 35 34 3; 31 28 � , _ �
��\ R30', ` .. -`yr • . '"i`�Q 8� 1 j 6TOPSIGN TYP. D.E I I 50' TYP. 0 UE � , , i:-� TVP. 1� � : 1
� , 53`�.1 �..� 30' � '�..�..� ' . . � .49 - - - • .
_ �
�' : : _
� � � 1, l � 38 � � , so� rrP. / a
� � -+ F. __L_L__- - -
1 . i
� � � "� _"—`-`--_' _-- . _ TYP. �
. . . ' - �` . ��._.�'-- - ----
Sp i R45' \\� �� � - � _
� : . _.�__.._. � � i � I
, 98 _1-t
5' . i �` ' za -
. 91 .
_ .�_
__ L
l 5a �,' � - _.J. .L.�_�.__ .r._'_' _'._. ,.__ �, __ ,�P __ _' J R45 i 1 � � � � p E � n .
\ n 6` 705' iYP. � _- __ R3 , � O.S. i R53' . i p _- - � � W li �
\\ � �� ' �+� .`� \ � 10 U.E. .- R30' o n w _.._.�..__�_ R30' 5' SIDEWALK ' j �� , . � �
� \� % * _ __ __.. _ ..__. ___ __ __.._ __ _ ._._ _ --- - - - - �- - - — - -- - -- -�-- 9 , I' ( 2 `� - � c
. . ._.--. _ _
. . � �- � � - — ___ . . _ . .. -- ._ _ _ _ __ _ �° - � ' 'o *g
7 � `�
/ � " — — ^ � � U.E. \ � .
S EETLIGH � � � \ ^ J
(� - 56.5' . �` �\
. � _ "�107 0 56.5' —�'� IYP. � TY Y 105' 10' U.Ej _ _ _ _ �� _ _ _ _ , J .. . . _ ' .
- 105' ll'P. TYP. 1�5� / 56.5'' 51��-/�\ � 24'U.E. �� iE��R31rR20 \�� 1 .....
. �. . . . ` � , 'r \ ` '! 1 TM12 1.� 14 15 16 17 � , nP. � , � 96 ; r ;% + '� 93 . : _ t��':.
/� . . I - �� ��
/ . ., . a ; 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 `� ' �.' �° s. ,o;, - - - , • _ '= .
; 9�-. � , � ��; � � - - � - � �
I � � R45' �
, i� � - . - - - - - C�.S. 29' L.M.E. �� 95 �: '" 61' g4 �� - . i .
,
- � � � - ` - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - , rrP. � i - F
� / , � � � * �� �
�!n ry,. � � /' i - - _ _ — _ z4' .E / ` R53 I i . Scale� 1" = 80'-0" � -� 1 a�
� �r' � (: C 0 A L 2• A N A - - - - -- - - - --� � O 0 40' 80' 160' ��!.'y�'
� i . . _
/ . � . . '
/ . / / . .2 4 . (y'70 /Be� .c� M T ' _ _ _ _' _ _ � .
��. _ � � - arf.e' ,�i /� — 3 , , �/ - - -PO- - ��Fa Y'`°
/ // %'. / � Y E / F a' 5' 0�1f. . -
_ __ _ �AL` � / �. - C B U . d -
!� . . . . .
- Y
_--___.—______ . - - . . / -
-- - ---- -- o�°� c; ' Sheet 1 0 2
-- o
_ _ f
— — -- — �
----- . - .
— -° .. _
- - — -- � _ '� .. _ _- ., ,:,„ :.,.�-�`9`�`Ot
LINE TABLE
L1 S86°01'27"E 25.05'
�2 S81°02'56"E35.39'
L3 N41 °05'35"E 41,81'
L4 N05°52'36"W 52.56'
L5 S76°15'10"W 35.87'
L6 N24°O6'14"W 29.56'
L7 N87°27'21"E 33.91'
�g N45°30'22"E 13.82'
�9 S71°30'35"E 15.00'
L10 N32°29'11"E 59.28'
L11 N55°33'34"W 21.61'
L12 S74°24'L�4"W 46.72'
L13 'J83°O6'40"W 31.69'
L14 t352°2°'21"W 45.06'
L15 iv43°4,','06"W �J,74'
L16 S73 33'21"W 45.50'
L17 N8010'16"W 12.98'
L18 N24°26'48"W 42.99'
L19 N81°12'S8"W 32.93'
l.20 N46°10'12"W 15.10'
L21 N40°55'42"W 40.44'
L22 N13°20'00"W 10.88'
L23 N26°37'36"E 24.50'
�4 N86°28'14"E 47.98'
�5 S08°59'44"E 37.67'
�6 S59°OB'S2"E 18.13'
�7 N54°38'51"E 27.57'
�=-a N20°03'48"W 35.48'
L29 N41°02'17"W 17.85'
L30 N69°43'51"W 56.14'
L3'I N65°36'35"W 31.57'
L32 N81°32'48"W 17.05'
L33 N00°40'31"E 22.66'
434 N60°03'30"E 28,09'
L35 S76°25'39"E 24.69'
L36 N29°59'37"E 17.97'
L37 N12°i9'45"E 20.18'
L38 NO2°52'36"W 18,91'
L39 S78°44'27"E 15.75'
L40 N27°41'21"E 29.50'
!'�1 S77°38'13"E 41.97'
L42 N41°52'38"E 23.38'
N(JTES
• STREETLIGHTS (g ARE 150' ON CENTEiR, ON ALTERNATE STREET SIDES,
FINAL LOCATIONS TO BE PROVIDED EY ELECTRIC ENGINEER AND TO BE
FIEID ADJUSTED AS NECESSARY.
• PARCEL BOUNDARY PROVIDED 8Y CFRNAHAN, PROCTOR, & CROSS, INC.
• ALL LAND AREAS WITHIN 150' OFTHI: SITE ARE ZONED AS N07ED AND
HAVE A FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATiON AS NOTE6 ON PLAN.
• THE SEPARATION OF THE PROPOSEC STREETTREES, LIGHTING AND
HOMES FROM SEACOAST UTILINAUiHORIN LWES IS SUBJECT 70 THE
REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF SEACOAST.
�A MINIMUM 15' SEfBACK WILL BF MA4�fTAINEO FROM SEACOAST LINES
UNLESS O7HERWISE NOTED.
. ALL STOP BARS AND SIGN LOCATIOW TO BE CERTIFIEO BY PROJEGT
ENGINEER.
• STOP BAR W ILL BE WHITE PAVERS Q2 THERMOPLASTIC ON ASPHALT.
� FOR SINGLE FAMILY, MAILBOXES W!:L$E PROVIDED ON EVERY LOT, AS
APPROVE� BY THE U:S. POSTAL REGULATIONS.
• STRUCTURES CAN BE PLACED ANYV'HERE ON EACH LOT, PROVIDED THAT
ALL MINIMUM SETBACKS ARE MHINT\INE� AS DEFINED THEREIN.
� CURBING DETAILS SHOWN ON ENGIIIEERING PLANS.
ENTRY SECURITY GATE TO BE EQU!'PED WITH KNOX KEY SWITCH.
• SEE ENGINEERING PLANS FOR ROA�IWAY CROSS SECTIONS.
� ALL SIGNAGE ARE PART OF A SEP ^.,ATE APPROVAL.
v SURROUNDING PARCEL INPORMAI � N AND PLANS AftE StiOWN�FOR
lHFORMATlONAL PURPOSES �'�NLY � � �
• YJILL Pftc7VIDE NEE� F R n`:,T� �uF.:.6 FOR Rl-DUCED SeTBP,uR( TO �.
.. MEETBUILOWGCO�EREQUIREp�nf�15. � .
WAIVERS REQU-STED
- Sedion 78-141, Ta61e W, City Code lo allow for a 50' wide lot RL-3 zoning district � . �
cells for a fi5' wide IoL '� - � �
- Section 78441, Ta61e 10, City Code tc aliow for a minimum 5,250 s.f. Lot area. RL�
zoningdisVictcallsforeminimumbta'ea�of6;500s.f. � �
- Section 7&141, Ta61e 10, of the City Code lo.allow for a 3'1"/6'N" side set6ack for
buildings; a 5'1"!8'N"side setback foraools; and a 3't"/6'11" side setbackscreeN
enclosures/decks within the 50' wide ItCa, RL-3 zoning d(strict ralis for a 7.5'side setback
- Section 78-441, Table 10, of the City C�de to allow a 5' rear setback for pools/spa and a
3' rear seMack for screan/enclosuresldecks. RL-3 zoning disfrict calls for a
10' rear set6acic.
- Section 78-141, Table 10, of fhe City Code to allow for a 12 side street setback for
buiidings, pools and screen/enclosure+ldecks within the 50' wide lots. RL-3 zoning distrid
calls for a 20' side street sefback. �
- Section 78-141, Table 10, ot the City Code to allow for a maximum 45 / bt coverage.
RL-3 zoning distric[ calls for a 35 � m�ximum lot coverage.
- Seclion 78-441 �- Waiver to allow the ssuance of building pertnits for dry models
prior to the recordaGon of the plat.
- Section 78506 - Waiver to allow sidexalks on one-side of the road.
- Section 78-316 Q) - Waiver to eliminate 10' Safe Zone Setback
SETBACK CH�ARTS
TYP. 50' X 105' SINGLE FAh11LY LOTS
*�� ide setback on Lots 30, 21 and 37 on lot line encumbered by 20' drainage easement
to have a 12' side building arid pool setback, 10' side screen/deck setback and a 10' side
fence setback. Side setback on Lot 26 on lot line encumbered by 24' utility easement to
have a i 3' side building and pool setback, 12' side screen/deck setback and a 12' side
fence setback. Side setback: on Lot 27 on lot line encumbered by 24' utility easement to
have a i?'side building and pool seiback, 14' side screen/deck setback and a 14'side
fence setback
TYP. LOT LAYQIl�� FOR PARCEL 8
50' X 105' SINGLE FAMILY LOTS
(
705' f
mP.l
I
�
3' MIN. REAR NO IiEAR OR SI�E
ENCLOSURFI � ENCLOSUfiE SEIBACKPoR
DECKSEfBACN_ 5'MIN.REAR FENCE
�'POOLSETBACK DECX
t0' MIN.
POOL ftEARBLOG.
� POOL � SE78ACK
n -�i
-r_... __ _ 'Il
ii
' MIN.3Y' ' I
� SIDEBIDG.
SETBACK MIN.tO'
BLOG.
15' MIN. FROM
BUILDINGORSIDE
ENTRYGARAGE
SETBACK
� �p � � '�gg I
. -���- ��� .
' -�-T
� 20' MIN. BLOG.
� SEfBACKFRONT
� ENiRYGARAGE
ENClOSURE
MIN.3't" MIN.fi'77' ENCLOSURE
)ESCREEN SI�ESCREEN �
iETHA�K SETBACK
t0'SI�E
MIN.St' STREEiFENCE
PooL MIN.BY7• SIOEPODL. P�L SETeACK
I�EPOOL SEfBACK �
___ E7sAac �_= I
n I 12'MIN.SIOE
� srrteer aoousPa
SCREEN SETBACK
I I 12' MIN. SIDE
MW. e'11' S7AEETBLDG.
SIDE BLOG. SEfHACK
SETBACK
� ' MIN.1 ' I �
s�o �
� � SEPARA ION I
-_ �� � � '� __ -
._ .. .. . S�i.c. ' �-_' _ . . . -. : .
� � � 10' U.& � .-. ��
STREET
�
LAND
DESIGN
SOUTH
ei�����o'�. ��o�e:o�ae nr<ntrac°urs
Envaonmentcl ierv:ces'�. i�an,portah�n
REVISIONSTO MODIFY SETBACK CHARTS
PREPARED BYLAND DESIGN SOUTH.ORIGINAL PLAN
PREPARED BY OTHERS.
.� REV 04/04/12 REV 04/'11/'12 REV OS/08/'12
n
esi n
siu o
Urban Planning & Design
Landscape Architecture
Communication Graphics
2000 Paim Beach Lakes Blvd.
Suite 600 The Concourse
West Palm Beach, FL 33409-6582
56'1.689.0066
Fax 561.689.�551
Email CAD@udsonline.com
CoPY�RhI
NI itlees.0asgns. errengemenia, and plans
reP�� hy Ma d2wig ere avn aE bY
anE Ne pmpertyotTe tlesig�re�, arM wee
�a�a ra ma eza�s�� use o� m a a��e
pmjact. These kees, tlesgns, airaipamen�s
o� plan¢ aha0 ml be ua�C by, ttdscbsetl
W enYPa�n.firtn,orcoryerel"unwdho�t
fha wMlen petmieebn ofNe tlesgnar.
doeN�mn�� +eoro» a.ra.s�
� �.: r: � e«��.� ��. a�.��.� �
Submitlelpatas OrexnBy
oe�o.o� sNc
01.1).02 SHG
SHG
08:19.02 SHG
�
�C.J
�
O
�
�� W
�� �r/�
� VJ
� V •�
� r }�
i
� � �
W �
� � W
� � L
WL.L� 1.�
Swle: AS NOTED
Sheet 2 of 2
. J
��i
* * .
*
� , � �'YY
:�. ��
AGENDA
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
TUESDAY, JUNE 12, 2012 AT 6:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
• CALL TO ORDER
• PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
• ROLL CALL
• ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, MODIFICATIONS
• REPORT BY THE DEVELOPMENT COMPLIANCE & ZONING MANAGER:
BAHAREH WOLFS
• APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 04/10/2012
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
Regular Members:
Michael Panczalc
Randolph Hansen
Joy Hecht
Roma Josephs
Douglas Pennell
Charles Hathaway
Howard Rosenkranz
Alternates •
Robert Savel�(lst Alt.)
1. Recommendation to City Council (Public Hearing) - QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING
MISC-12-04-000084 Gosman Parcel
A request from Downtown at the Gardens Associates, LTD and IMI Kyoto Gardens I LLC
to extend the temporary parking use on the Gosman property for a period of three (3) years.
The Gosman property is located at the southeast corner of Kyoto Gardens Drive and
Alternate AlA within the Regional Center Development of Regional Impact (DRI).
Aroject Manager: Kathryn DeWitt, Senior Planner, kdewitt(a�pb�fl.com
Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board
June 12, 2012
2. Recommendation to City Council (Public Hearing) - QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING
PUDA-I2-OS-000038: Midtown Planned Unit Development Amendment
Mainstreet at Midtown, LP and Palm Beach Community Church, Inc. are requesting to
modify the approved signage package for the Midtown Planned Unit Development (PUD).
The modifications include the addition of a new monument sign, addition of tenants to the
existing monument signs, and a waiver to allow a changeable copy sign.
Project Manager. Kathryn DeWitt, Senior Planner, kdewitt(c��pbgfl.com
3. Recommendation to City Council (Public Hearing) - QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING
PCDA-12-04-000014: Evergrene Planned Communitv Development (PCD)
Amendment
A request by the Evergrene Master Association, Inc., for an amendment to the Evergrene
Planned Coinmunity Development (PCD) to approve a waiver from Section 78-316 (j),
Minimum Separation, for Parcels 1, 2, 6, 7, and 8. The Evergrene PCD is located at the
southeast corner of Donald Ross Road and North Military Trail.
Project Manager: Tamashbeen Rahman, Planner, trahman(c�pb�fl.com
4. OLD BUSINESS
5. NEW BUSINESS
6. ADJOURNMENT
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Florida 3tatute 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodations to
participate in this proceeding should conLact the Ciry Clerk's O�ce, no later than frve days prior to the proceeding, at te[ephone number (561)
799-4120 for assistance; if hearing impaired, telephone the Florida Relay Service Numbers (800) 955-8771 (TDD) or (800) 955-8770 (VOICE),
for assistance. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Plannzng, Zonirzg and Appeals Board, Local Plannzng t�geney, or Land
Development Regulations Commission, with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, they will need a record of the
proceedings; and for such, they may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal zs to be based. Exact [ega[ description and/or survey for the cases may be obtained from the files in the Growth
Mmzagement Department.
g: Ip&z shareladministrationlpzab agendalp & z agenda 20121pzab 04.10.20121pzab agenda 06.12.2012 word format.docx
2
�
��,.
Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board Updates
Mav 3. 2012 Citv Council Meetin�
June 12, 2012
• Hamptons at the Gardens was granted site plan approval for a 224 unit apartment community
within Parcel A.
• Central Gardens was granted a Planned Community Development (PCD) rezoning approval for
41.82 acres located at the southwest corner of Hood Road and Central Blvd. (total of 348
residential units, 57,500 square feet of retail use and 40,784 square feet of office use)
• Gardens Shul was granted site plan approval to allow for modifications to the existing site plan
and building elevations.
• The City-initiated Land Development Regulation (LDR) Amendment was approved which clarified
certain provisions in the PGA Overlay.
• The City initiated petition adopting the City's Lobbyists Registration Standard Operating
Procedure (SOP) was approved.
June 7, 2012 Citv Council Meetine
• The City-initiated amendment to the Banyan Tree Planned Unit Development (PUD) to modify
certain conditions of approval related to landscape maintenance was approved.
• Rezoning to portions of the County's Loxahatchee Slough Natural Area from Planned
Development Area (PDA) to Conservation (CONS) was approved.
� The Jewish Community Center's request to rezone to a Mixed Use PUD with site plan approval
to allow the development of a 56,000 square-foot community center and S00-student K-8
private school was approved.
• Trevi PUD was granted rezoning and site plan approval for a 76-unit townhome community.
• The City-initiated comprehensive plan text amendment to various Elements was approved.
These amendments included revisions to the Future Land Use Element, Public Safety Element,
and Transportation Element.