The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda AIPP 011905 - PGA Flyover�a �� .�.�.��'+:� �J � \�� i'�'Y'�i'.:;i�i; %; -m�;y � TO: DATE: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM Art in Pubiic Places Board Members January 6, 2005 Angela Wong, Operations Manager � Call to Artist for PGA Boulevard Flyover Tower Sculptures City Project No. 2002-018 On January 19, 2005, the Art in Public Places Committee will be conducting the Fina1 Review Phase for the above-mentioned project. As stated in the Call to Artist, a point-based scoring system will be utilized to select the finalist for recommendation to the City Council. Scores will be based on the following criteria as demonstrated in each presentation, proposal materials and through reference checks. 1. 40 points Aesthetic quality and appropriateness for the location site 2. 20 points Experience in similar commissions 3. 20 points Quality and Reasonability of cost and fee evaluation materiais 4. 10 points Suitability and durability of materials and potential impact for future maintenance issues 5. 10 points References (Comments collected by Joel Straus are attached) The scoring sheet is attached for your use during the presentations. The sheets will be collected at the conclusion of the meeting and tallied by me. If accepted by the Art in Pubfic Places Committee, the Artist with the highest score will be recommended as the finalist to the City Council. The Finalist's agreement and presentation is scheduled for consideration at the City Council's February 17, 2005 meeting. Reminder: The City is not required to select a finalist or bring the project to completion if in the City's sole judgment, Arkists or proposals do not meet eligibility requirements, project goals and/or guidelines. The City has the right to reject any proposal, at any time beginning with the selection process through to installation on the grounds that the proposal or artwork, amenities or enhancements appear to have a fault in fabrication; pose a safety hazard including but not limited to standards as defined by OSHA; are fraudulent or non-authentic; require special maintenance or landscaping other than which had been previously identified and agreed to by the City; does not meet project goals and guidelines. Any substantial deviations from the FinalisYs approved design must be approved by the City Council. Due to the timeframe of the presentations, there wili be sandwiches and refreshments available for you. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (561) 799-4127. Thank you again for your participation on this project. Attachment cc: Jack Doughney, Gommunity Services Administrator Amy Stepper, Recreation Supervisor Kara Irwin, Sr. Planner Joel Straus, Art Consultant A. Ed Oliver, Architectural Gonsultant Call to Artist Semi-Finalists 1Jan 06 05 03:37a Artist: Reference: M} � JS Cons�lting )SC Reference Sheet P�oject: Contact Info: � Date: �/� 1 How would yau �,y,r,,�- �w�a�, � �.�,,�. characterize the working Relationship? Did artist stay within lnA�, � Budget? d �' Was the artist on time/ per Schedufe 1� I W �a �e r �o(�,.. �� t c�� ,� �F n 1��'� Was the final outcome � the intended result? �''� Did the scop� of �he project change mid- �� stream� , Did you get value for �-- the $$? How would you � � characterize Contract negotiativns? Would you want to � � n � � � � � ��`� �:tf� work with artist again? '� u'`�� d What was the best �r� Q��`�"��'`^ ��''��- �-• �a�k�- .��'� t�.e... aspect of the praject? �iU'� 4t�� , A'� ,i��. �. � �.�.: What was the mast �y`O�5 `'"'`� "`� difficult aspect? /�1� � � U l t7�� " ��'1�1 ✓A t' ��„�E.c.y Would you do �� S,�-�- �E ►�,�--�,..� differently with artist? �c��;,�. � Qr,��o�„�� Have there be�n any ii„�,�,�,,,�.��-1 ras(�� ,� � �� maintenance issues? J� 5'' � Reviewers general Impression? {� ` l.tl, � V P//�IQ, f S ,�i t�u,.f � 1 � �f' �`� C.QC�.�[ p.l Jan 06 OS 03:37a JS Consulting p•2 JSC Reference Sheet �on-��sPonsive� How would you characterize the working Re4ationship? � Did artist stay within Budget? Was the artist on time/ per Schedule Was the final outcome the intended resuit? Did the scope of the project �change mid- stream? Did you get value far the $�? How wouid you characterize Contract negotiations? Wouid you want to work with artist again? What was the best aspect of the prQject? What was the most difficult aspect7 Would you do differentfy with artist? Have there been any maintenance issues? Reviewers generai Irnpression? Jan 06 05 03:38a JS Consulting )SC Reference Sheet p.3 IJ an -�-e �p�n S i v e, How would you characterize the working Reiationship? Did artist stay within Budget? Was the artist on timel per Schedu{e Was the final outcome the intended result? Did the scope of the project change mid- stream? Did you get value for the $$? How would you characterize C�ntraci negotiations? Would you want to work with artist again? INhat was the best aspect of the project? What was the most difficult aspect? Wou{d you do diff�rently wifih artist? Have there been any maintenance issues? Reviewers general impression? J�n 06 05 03:98a �S Consulting p•4 03108 2004 09:48 FAX 22925085 ICA OSLO f�i001 )SC Reference Shee� a�scribe ynur project. �i j''"'rj�,�S G?�� /`�c.e:T�rS ' Hnw would you � f characterize th� �f workin Relatinnshi ? Did artist stay within Budg�t? �� Was the artist on time/ pet' SChedule . Was the final put�orrte the intended result? � T?id the scope at the project change mid- �� stream? Did yau get v�lue for ' th� $$? Now woukd you eharacierlte Contract �� ,,�'��G ne otiatians? iNould yqu want to work with artist aga�in7 "" What was th� best , �r�_ r� aspeat of the ptoject? /?� ��-71� Whet was the most � f[��u,,,nl�,� �� o� %�`�'�- � dlfficult aspect? �'''"' • , �- Would you da diftersntly with artist? �� Hav� tt�ef9 I��n any � maintenance issu�g? Review�rs generaf �j � ,,,,/�;�� Impression? V ��'=�r�/^'� �� Lr'�Lc.}� i - J�n 06 05 03:38a JS Consulting p.5 )SC Reference Sheet � �� How would you t�-��-�,,pa�� .b �,�,oy� W� characterize the ' working Relationship? ' �` � - Did artist stay within Budget? S �j �,r� ( Was the artist on time/ per Sch�dule (�Q� , l �� Was the finai outcome the in#ended result? �� b�-- W�� Did the scope of the project change mid- � ,�, ( �/ stream? ��q� �� P� Did you get value for the $$? C/�, _ � �_ How would you characterize Contract negotiations? Would you want to work with artist again? G�-�-� i What was the best aspect of the project? . V�.. ' What was the most difficult aspect? - Y� wo�ia you ao differently with artist? � Have there been any maintenance issues? t �� S Reviswers general Impression? „_ _ t r( „ _ � _ �f � d�. t I+�s �r�- �` ►..�,� ' r, ' - � A' dtL J��(o �r /l•f � �,..> s� Q` �2 , L;.,� r.s,..,� . � a _ _ I �. _t � , _ � i , , Jan 06 �5 03:39a JS Consulting p.6 Sent By: BEAT; 3054673383; Sep-10-Q4 10:56A�; Page 2/2 Artiat: Terje Londaas Phil Martin Raterence: BEA internationa! )SC Reference Sheet Projact: Palm Beach Gardens Flyover Date: Contact Info: 1 954 8540366 philipmQbeai.com m u�Yt� Cc�wl- �m�cc av ��. cfe.vts� sxci� ��Zcs�-7� , Describ� yaur project, m��-��p� �� ,�NS I t� �t2 �� I�� f�� How wauid you characterize the ��j�j��fpV�{�Y' workin R�lationshi ? Did artist stay within ��,,��, Budget? Was the artist on time! A��,�y per Schedul� Was the final outcome �� $ �j�� k�� ,�Y��s the intended result? Did the scope of the praject change mid- ��' stream? Did you get value fvr �� the $$? Haw would you characterize Contract ��5 '�� ' ne otiations? wouid you want to �V,�,,{ p��r-tY ��, work with artist again? What was the best �� ,�� 5��,.� aspect of the project? What was the most �n�� ,��f� � p,�-jT�G G�'�{S� difficult aspect? �� y,� Wauld you d� K� ��,�� u�� differentiy with artist? Have there been any maintenance issues? �� %�2. Reviewers general �� {� 1�t7 �ki��l��'��- � i� ��(�fl�� lmpre5sion? J-�U�t��S �"�I'�6�,�' 7(j yc�y1.�C_ f.Ur(y( �flryu � Jan 06 05 03:39a 3S Consulting )SC Reference Sheet p.7 How would yau �'rvca�wwws , t,��( �,,�1i1 I,ar•d Ar�• � characterize the ,s� s � c�w�••,�;�,�,, E,hll:,�.� I,ar- �� warking RelatiQnship? p� Qid artist stay within Budget? � Was the artist an time/ per Schedule �� Was the final outcome � the intended result? aid the scope of the �Da�,� � b� �y�1�,Q , t�cn� . c�w. project change mid- ,�� ,� ,b ,��,� ��.,. ' stream? Did you get value for the $$? How would you characterize Contract � �� negotiations? Would you want to work with art+st again? 1l�Jhat was the best � aspect of the project? �b� .- � - t _� � W Y DAIk►�L 0 lNhat was the most difficult aspect? � r � w�.� M Ma�i � ,.. Would you do , differently with artist? • Have there b�en any maintenance issues? � � 1._ �� L �M �t �V� ►t1� V l Reviewers general irnpression? Jan 06 05 03:39a , JS Consulting JSC Reference Sheet Artist: D 110 Project: Reference: � r"� hp �j/{, (�� Contact Info: �+��in7Ld oAA.�� • � 1_ 1 f{ i I Now would you characterize the working Relatronship? Did artist stay within Budget? Was the artist on time/ ��'l- per Schedule Was the final ou#come the intended result? Did the scope of the project change mid- stream? d Did you get value for the $$? How would you characterize Contract negotiafiions? � �1 � Would you want to work with artist again? What was the best ` aspect of the project? /t ' P l[lb r� ... .�-� Whafi was the most difficult aspect? P�t, Would you do � differently with artisfi? �� Have there been any maintenance issues? I�evieWers general Impression? . � � ,- mZ�,;,:. n d� �� ., � `—�-�—�. � , ► �� , .. � r . W� � � / ,cm � , , , �� . � 4 u� n,(,G �� G� a.� � , N � � �'►►�.� I '�i �_ �L_ • � _ �. .� _ p.8 Jan 06 05 03:39a JS Consultin� ' p.9 )SC Reference Sheet Artist: OSj A y 1 PraJect: � 6 U��1b�1 p Date: Reference: _ � i r ' How would you characterize the working Relationship? � Did artist stay within Budg�t? Was the artist on time/ per Schedu�e Was the final outcome the intended result? Did the scope of the project change mid- stream? Did you get value for the $$? How would you characterize Contract negotiations? �� Would you want to work with artist again? What was the best aspect of the project? What was the most difficult aspect? ` �S� Would you do differently with artist? Have there been any maintenance issues? � Reviewers general } Impression? h � „ � �u � �.� f lr/ � d� � �� . 1� � Contact Info: � 0 � 117'� �� '�C ►"¢5(t�Q � _ i. � � , .� l _. r '(( � �"`''� �rt� b�/1 k,. R Pe ta... �� A- v � V� • � c � � v' ` �'St� L �'� (" w� . . , � � January 19, 2005 Finalist Score Sheet