Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda PZAB 012406
,d EMEW CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS 10500 N. MILITARY TRAIL • PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410 -4698 MEMORANDUM DATE: January 24, 2006 TO: Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board Members FROM: Growth Management Department • • SUBJECT: Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board Meeting Tuesday, January 24, 2006 - 6:30 P.M. Enclosed is the agenda containing the items to be presented on Tuesday, January 24, 2006. This meeting will be held in the Council Chambers, Palm Beach Gardens Municipal Building, 10500 North Military Trail, beginning at 6:30 p.m. Enclosed with this memorandum are the following items: 1. An agenda for the meeting; and 2. A compact disc containing PowerPoint presentations with user instructions; and 3. A Growth Management Department staff report for the items to be heard. As always, the respective Project Manager's telephone number and e-mail address have been provided in case you have any questions or require additional information on any petition. This will help us offer better staff support in the review of these applications. Jeneve Labossiere, Planning Technician, will call to confirm your attendance. Charles K. Wu, AICP Growth Management Administrator CKW:hlg ViG Da:be0^�a: �n;:ri,r CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS .� 10500 N. MILITARY TRAIL • PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410 -4698 AGENDA CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD TUESDAY, JANUARY 24, 2006, AT 6:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS • CALL TO ORDER • PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE • REPORT BY THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATOR: CHARLES WU • APPROVAL OF MINUTES: JANUARY 10, 2006 • PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD Regular Members: Craig Kunkle (Chair) Barry Present (Vice Chair) Randolph Hansen Dennis Solomon Michael Panczak Douglas Pennell Jonathan D. Rubins • SWEARING IN OF ALL PARTIES • Alternates: Joy Hecht (I' Alt.) Amir Kanel (2"d Alt.) Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board January 24, 2006 Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council: • Ex Parte Communication (Quasi Judicial) 1. Petition PCDA- 05 -11- 000001: NorthCorp PCD Amendment Public Hearing/Recommendation to City Council: A request by Cotleur & Hearing, Inc., agent for RCA Drainage Association, for the approval of an amendment to the development order of the NorthCorp Planned Community Development (PCD) to allow the addition and modification of certain conditions of approval of Ordinance 1, 1990 to be consistent with the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County, the NorthCorp PCD, generally located North of Burns Road, South of PGA Blvd., East of Interstate 95 and West of Alternate Al A. Project Manager: Joyce Cai, Principal Planner c� j (799 -4236) Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council: Ex Parte Communication (Quasi Judicial) 2. Petition SPLN- 05 -11- 000003: Anspach Site Plan Amendment Public Hearing/Recommendation to City Council: A request by Cotleur & Hearing, Inc., agent for Anspach Holdings, Ltd., for an amendment to the previously approved site plan to allow for the approval of a 48,941 square -foot building, located on Lot 1 of the 7.0- • acre site, which comprises of Lot 1 of the south park center plat and lot 2 of the west park center plat in the NorthCorp Planned Community Development (PCD). The subject site is generally located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Riverside Drive and NorthCorp Parkway. Project Manager: Joyce Cai, Principal Planner icai(t nb¢fl.com (799 -4236) Workshop: 3. PCD- 04 -01: Parcel 31.04 — Rezoning and Master Development Plan Approval SP- 04 -05: Cimarron Cove — Site Plan Approval Workshop: A request by Marty Minor, of Urban Design Studio, on behalf of Gardens 95 Limited Partnership, L.C.C., for approval of a rezoning from a Planned Development Area zoning designation to a Mixed Use Planned Community District (MXD PCD) Overlay zoning designation and approval of a Planned Community District (PCD) master plan and the site plan of the residential portion of the PCD. The master development plan allows for the development of 11,600 square feet of commercial retail, 15,000 square feet high- turnover restaurant, 4,000 square foot bank with drive -thru, a 12,000 square foot drugstore, 10,000 square feet professional office use and 252 residential dwelling units. The approximately 50.58 -acre subject site, referred to as "Parcel 31.04," is located on the southeast corner of the Interstate 95 and Central Boulevard intersection and the future I- • 95 interchange. Project Manager: Talal Benothman, Planning Manager tbenothman(&pbgfl.com (7994233) 2 Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board January 24, 2006 Workshop: P 4. PUD- 04 -11: Parcels 31.06 and 31.07 - Central Park Residential High and Mixed- Use Planned Unit Development Workshop: A request by Land Design South, on behalf of EB Developers, Inc., for rezoning and site plan approval of Parcels 31.06 and Parcel 31.07. Both parcels currently have a Planned Development Area (PDA) zoning designation. Parcel 31.06 is proposed to be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development/Residential High (PUD/RH) zoning district with 116 condominiums. Parcel 31.07 is proposed to be rezoned to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (PUD/MXD) with 60 condominiums, 99,934 square feet of commercial and office development, and a 141,706 square -foot, 409 -space parking garage. The approximately 41.75 -acre subject site is located at the southwest corner of Hood Road and Central Boulevard and is bounded on the west by Interstate 95 and Westwood Lakes PUD. Project Manager: Jackie Holleman, Planner ihollomanralabetl.com (7994237) 5. OLD BUSINESS 0 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. ADJOURNMENT in accordance with the Americana with Disabilittes Act and Florida Statute 28626, persons with disabilities needing special accommodations to participate in this proceeding should contact the City Clerk's Office, no later than five days prior to the proceeding, at telephone number (561) 799 -4120 for assistance; if hearing impaired, telephone the Florida Relay Service Numbers (800) 955 -8771 (7DD) or (800) 955 -8770 (VOICE), for assistance. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission, Local Planning Agency, Board of Zoning Appeals, or Land Development Regulations Commission, with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, they will need a record of the proceedings; and for such, they may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Exact legal description and/or survey for the cases may be obtained from the files in the Growth Management Department. Common/pz agenda 1- 24- 06.doc • PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING January 10, 2006 MINUTES • 0 The Regular Meeting of the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, was called to order by Chair Craig Kunkle at 6:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex, 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. REPORT BY THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATOR: Charles Wu reported City Council had approved the following cases: (1) Mirasol Walk Bank of America, and (2) The Point PUD, with two 4 -story office buildings. . APPROVAL OF MINUTES: DECEMBER 13,2005: Motion was made, seconded and unanimously carried to approve the minutes of the December 13, 2005 meeting as submitted. ROLL CALL "; .. Susan Bell, Secretary for the meeting, called the roll for the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board: Present Chair Craig Kunkle Vice Chair Barry Present Dennis Solomon Douglas Pennell Michael Panczak Randolph Hansen Jonathan D.. Rubins Joy Hecht (1" Alt.) Amir Kanel (2 °d Alt.) Absent All those intending to testify in any of tonight's hearings were sworn in. ELECTION OF OFFICERS: Mr. Present made a motion recommending Craig Kunkle as Chair for another year. Motion was seconded by Mr. Hansen, and unanimously carved. Mr. Hansen made a motion recommending Barry Present as Vice Chair. Mr. Pennell seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous vote. t Chair Kunkle announced that agenda item 3 would be considered first due to request by the applicant for continuance. f Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes January 10, 2006 Page 2 • Recommendation to City Council: Ea Parte Communication fOuasi Judicial) SP- 05 -01: Parcel 27.09 Gardens Pointe A request by Marty Minor of Urban Design Studio, agent for Gardens Pointe LLC, for site plan approval of 216 residential condominium high -rise units within two twelve -story towers, and 24 townhouses. The 6.6 -acre subject site is located at the northwest corner of Kyoto Gardens Drive and Fairchild Gardens Avenue (adjacent to the Landmark), which is within the Regional Center Development of Regional Impact (DRI). Chair Kunkle called for any ex -parte communication. Mr. Hansen reported meetings with the applicant a couple of months ago. Other ex -parte was declared that was not picked up by the microphone. Chair Kunkle reported he had also attended meetings in the past. Growth Management Administrator Wu requested that the public hearing be opened since mailings had been sent out and this matter had been advertised. Chair Kunkle called for comments from the applicant. Mr. John Sapo, Senior Vice President with Kolter Communities advised they were requesting a continuance to February 14 due to issues of the project design with staff and they were working with staff to improve the project. • MOTION: Motion was made and seconded to continue item SP -05 -01 to February 14. Motion carried by unanimous vote. Mr. Wu introduced the Recording Secretary, Susan Bell, and noted that the previous recording secretary had requested to be relieved of the night meetings but would continue to transcribe the minutes. Public Hearing. and Recommendation to City Council: Ex Parte Communication Plans a_reallocation of sUgare footage between certain buildings on site: (2) revised footprints and elevations of certain buildings to accommodate the-changes in square footage. (3) the introduction of a narking structure; and (4) other minor changes to the site and landscape glans The approximately 30.03 -acre RCA tenter PUD is generally bounded by the PGA Flyover to the north. the Florida East Coast (FE-0- Railway to the east. the Gardens Station Mixed -Use PUD to the south, and RCA Boulevard to the west • The following ex -parte communications were reported: Chair Kunkle reported he met with the applicant and reviewed their revisions. Mr. Pennell reported meeting with Jeff Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes January 10, 2006 Page 3 • Marshall. Mr. Hansen reported he met with Jeff Marshall last week. Donaldson Hearing provided a presentation on behalf of Catalfumo Construction and Development, noting this was Parcel 5A, explaining that when this project had gone before City Council they had directed that certain square footage located east of RCA be moved to the west half of the plan to make room for a transit station on the east side of the site plan in the future and that a bus loop be provided, and this application was in response to that direction. The site plan modifications were summarized, and it was noted that Robb 8t Stuckey was to be a primary tenant. Mr. Hearing reviewed proposed waivers and stated the applicant was in agreement with all conditions of approval. Mr. Hearing explained that the parking garage was not included in the square footage increase. Mr. Panczak expressed his opinion the project looked great overall but felt the south elevations of buildings 3 and 4 and the north elevation of building 10 lacked continuity with the rest of the project. Mr. Hansen commented that he and Jeff Marshall had gone over some of his concerns, including the color scheme. Mr. Marshall had assured him that the color scheme would be closer to the color schemes represented within the package on the building elevations rather than the color scheme shown on the cover. Mr. Hansen agreed with that, other than the elevations for Buildings 3 and 4, which he did not think were consistent, and did not like the greenish color that was introduced. Mr. Hansen indicated he did not agree • with the scale of the articulation of the openings in the parking garage, which he felt were too large in comparison with the openings on the rest of the building, and although he was all for security and safety he did not believe the Police Department should dictate the visual character of the City based on openness and security. Mr. Hansen commented if the parking was used strictly for office parking he could agree with 9 -1/2' parking spaces but disagreed with 9' spaces. Mr. Hansen asked if the overall square footage was increased almost 90,000 square feet on the basis that this would be a furniture use for almost half of the project, if there was any recourse in the future if the use changed. Mr. Hearing responded that was unlikely, but if it did happen it would be the applicant's issue to deal with and they would have to come up with another use and convert buildings to another use that did not have the trip generation. Mr. Hearing explained that in the next 20 years, Treasure Coast would like transit areas to be more intense uses. Planning Manager Michael Sanchez commented that when the applicant had requested changing to the furniture use they, had been made aware that if there were a change in use they would have to go to a less intense use, and that was a condition of approval. Mr. Hansen asked what the relationship was with Treasure Coast --if the City was no longer in the driver's seat on some issues such as moving buildings, etc. Mr. Wu explained that Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council had been hired by South Florida Regional Transit Authority to look at all communities along the railroad tracks to see what they could do to further chances of obtaining federal grants to do Tri Rail extensions to Jupiter. One important criteria was that if all along the tracks uses were intensified — particularly at station . areas —it would increase chances substantially of getting grants. Mr. Wu explained that transit - oriented development for this project was very important and Treasure Coast had • been very helpful to facilitate making this project more successful if a Tri Rail station did Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes January 10, 2006 Page 4 • happen here. Mr. Wu explained that the City was in the driver's seat but Treasure Coast was helping to facilitate their vision. Mr. Solomon asked if the potential Tri Rail station use had figured into determining the parking spaces and traffic trips for this project. Mr. Wu responded it had not, and that would be done in the future. Mr. Solomon asked if that should have been done now. Mr. Wu explained that the land adjacent to the railroad tracks was privately held, and the developer had no obligation or requirement to vacate that land; the best that could be done was to have them shift the entitlement between the road and railroad tracks to the western side in the interim, to keep that Tri Rail piece vacant to be positioned to do a station there in the future. Parking was discussed —Mr: Sanchez explained there was a conceptual future parking garage on the southwestern portion of the proposed plan, and the applicant was required to work with the South Florida Transportation Authority who oversees Tri Rail stations to see if that area would work for their parking, and they had confirmed that proposed conceptual plans would work. Mr. Solomon indicated he was not in favor of 9' parking spaces. Mr. Solomon felt the parking garage and the attached building could be improved in some way, but stated his primary concern was the 9' Spaces. Ms. Hecht asked about residential, since she thought that was the idea was to have residential development along with Tri Rail. Mr. Hearing indicated residential would • probably be introduced when a station was actually proposed. Mr. Kanel asked where any future residential would occur —Mr. Hearing responded it would most likely be in multi -story buildings on the east side of the road, integrated with the Tri Rail station; but might also occur along some of the roadways where currently there was parking. The design of the future station and there was sufficient space where a double rail and bridge could be accommodated. Mr. Sanchez noted the plan for the eastern portion of the site was conceptual and would come before this board in the future. Mr. Kanel asked if the lake was the same size after it had been rotated, to which Mr. Hearing responded it was larger. Mr. Kanel was not in favor of 9' spaces, and suggested dividing spaces between compact 9' spaces and 10' spaces for larger vehicles. Mr. Kanel asked if furniture use was conditional —Mr. Sanchez responded that it was not, and clarified that the parking ratio for furniture was 2 per thousand for the extra 90,000 square feet. Mr. Kanel expressed concern that if the furniture store went out of business that use of the space would be limited so that space might stay vacant for a long time. Mr. Sanchez explained that parking ratio for retail was twice as much as a furniture store so if that designation were used it would be an over abundance of parking. Mr. Hearing noted this would be a very high -end furniture and design center. Mr. Sanchez noted a comparable use in parking and trip generation would be light industrial or warehouse. Mr. Present asked if the waiver could be changed to 9 -1/2' parking spaces. Mr. Hearing proposed the first two floors at 9 -1/2' and the rest at 9', but would also re- stripe to get as many 9 -1/2' spaces as possible. Mr. Present stated he preferred 9 -1/2' or cut down the • 90,000 square feet, and he did not think there was any support on this board for 9' spaces. -W Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes January 10, 2006 Page 5 • Mr. Hearing confirmed the location of land that would be left vacant for a future Tri Rail station possibly within the next ten years. Tri Rail was meeting with West Palm Beach, Jupiter, and would be meeting with the City'to address the issues of land use so that those could be intensified to obtain federal grants. Mr. Present asked for a guarantee that Tri Rail would be there in the future; Mr. Hearing responded this was going in the right direction, to shift the buildings. Mr. Wu indicated any site plan change would require coming back before this board and moving all entitlements was a big first step; although there were no guarantees there would actually be a Tri Rail station, there were safeguards built in. Mr. Pennell complimented the applicant for moving everything to leave vacant land, he liked the 4 -story building height, and he did not think the parking garage would be seen. Mr. Hearing advised only a part of it would be seen. Mr. Pennell indicated he was comfortable with the 9' spaces and other projects had been approved with 9' spaces. Mr. Pennell stated he liked the colors, and he liked the nice size trees in the landscaping. Mr. Rubins commented he had a problem with the 9' ,parking spaces and felt it would be impossible to enforce employee parking there. Chair Kunkle declared the public hearing open. Hearing no comments from the public, Chair Kunkle declared the public hearing closed. • Mr. Hansen asked if landscaping would go in along RCA Center Drive. Mr. Sanchez explained the area would be hydro- seeded, roadway landscaping and the buffer along the FEC right -of -way would be installed. Mr. Solomon expressed his opinion there was a real problem with parking for a Tri Rail station, which was not really considered, and this was a windfall for the developer. Mr. Solomon expressed opposition to 9' parking spaces, and proposed that the solution could be to cut back on the additional square footage or build the future conceptual parking garage now. The future dynamic of Tri Rail was discussed. Ms. Hecht commented Tri Rail had come to Frenchman's to see where residents would like a station and had advised the probable end would be Indiantown Road, and asked if Palm Beach Gardens would really get a station at this location. Mr. Wu explained how this site had been chosen and confirmed that if there were a site within the City it would be at this location. Ms. Hecht asked who would pay for the station and the adjacent parking facilities. Mr. Wu explained it would be Tri Rail. Ms. Hecht indicated she would .accept 9' spaces; Mr. Kanel indicated he would not. Mr. Present indicated he was not sure a parking garage would work in the conceptual space. Mr. Hearing explained there would be grade and one deck and that would accommodate probably 200 cars for employees of Building 10 and 11. 25 -30 spaces would be lost if there were 9 -1/2' spaces instead of 9'. More narrow drive lanes in the parking garage would not allow more spaces. Mr. Rubins asked what would compel the • developer to build the additional garage —it was explained there was nothing to compel OVII �M Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes January 10, 2006 Page 6 • him to do so until Tri Rail indicated they would build there. Mr. Hearing indicated the applicant, wished to move forward to City Council with recommendations from this board. MOTION: Mr. Hansen moved to recommend to City Council approval of Petition PUD -A -05- 09 -01 RCA Center PUD Revisions to Approved Development Plans with all conditions set forth in the stab report with the following additional conditions: 1. That the parking garage have no parking spaces less than 9 -1/21; 2. That the elevations of the parking garage portion of that structure be brought more into scale with the openings and the architectural scale of the connected retail space that is connected to the parking garage; 3. That the color schemes be consistent with those presented in the package; that Buildings 3 and 4 be more consistent with the other color schemes, that there be a palette of two colors unless there is a third palette brought in- that is more compatible with those, less greenish in appearance. Mr. Hansen stated he was satisfied with two color palettes for those buildings and that they be consistent with the elevations and not consistent with the rendering that was provided. Motion was seconded. Mr. Rubins indicated he would like language for the second garage, since that would just be additional future cost for the developer. Mr. Hansen expressed his opinion as maker of the motion`that if they were forced to go to 9 -1/2' spaces they would lose enough space so that could compel the garage. Mr. Solomon stated he was not in favor of the motion, that this was not ready to move on to City Council, that there were too many large open -ended items that should be looked right here such as architecture, color, and parking; and if this motion passed there should be another waiver for not having enough parking spaces which had not been a part of the petition. Mr. Solomon stated he felt the applicant should re- group or if they would not he felt the motion should be defeated and there should be a motion for denial of the petition. Chair Kunkle asked that all votes be recorded by individual on this petition. The members voted as follows: Chair Craig Kunkle - for Vice Chair Barry Present - for Dennis Solomon - against Douglas Pennell for Michael Panczak - for Randolph Hansen - for Jonathan D. Rubins - for • The motion carried by vote of 6 -1. Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes January 10, 2006 Page 7 • Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council Petition: LDR- 05 -06: Off -Site Miti�cx i on Public Hearing and Recommendation to City. Council A City - initiated amendment to the City's Code of Ordinances by amending Chapter 78, "Land Development. " Article V. 'Wunalementaa Regulations, "Division S. "Natural Resourcgs and Environmentally City Forester Mark Hendrickson reported a change was suggested at the last meeting by Mr. Solomon and had been made and added to page 6, that the independent state certified general property appraiser that would be acceptable to the City. Mr. Hendrickson advised that a copy of this code had been sent out to all development parties or agencies which regularly worked in the City, and there had been one response, which was positive. Mr. Hendrickson also advised that this had gone to the Community Aesthetics Board for review and they had given 100% support. Chair Kunkle declared the public hearing open. Hearing no comments from the public, Chair Kunkle declared the public hearing closed. Mr. Kanel noted on page 3 the word "option" ; it was confirmed by staff that should be "opinion ". • MOTJON: Motion was made and seconded to recommend to City Council approval of Petition: LDR 05 -06: Off Site Mitigation. Motion carried by unanimous 7 -0 vote. OLD BUSINESS Mr. Wu noted that attendance records for the members of the board had been included in the packets inside the front cover of each member's book, so that they could monitor their attendance. Members should monitor carefully to avoid missing three in a row, or a quarter of the required meetings, and there were no excused absences. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business to come before the Board. r Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes January 10, 2006 Page 8 • ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 7 :57 p.m. The next regular meeting will be held January 24, 2006. F.W1 Craig Kunkle, Jr., Chair Barry Present, Vice Chair Dennis Solomon q. Randolph Hansen • Douglas Pennell Michael Panczak Jonathan Rubins Joy Hecht Amir Kanel Susan Bell, Secretary for the Meeting • CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS • PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD Agenda Cover Memorandum • Date Prepared: January 15, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: PCDA- 05 -11- 000001 Subject/Agenda Item: Petition PCDA= 05 -11- 000001: NorthCorp PCD Amendment Public Hearing/Recommendation to City Council: A request by Cotleur & Hearing, Inc., agent for RCA Drainage Association, for the approval of an amendment to the development .order of the NorthCorp Planned Community Development (PCD) to allow the addition and deletion of certain conditions of approval of Ordinance 1, 1990 to be consistent with the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. The NorthCorp PCD is 107 acres and is generally located North of Burns Road, South of PGA Blvd., East of Interstate 95 and West of Alternate AIA. [X] Recommendation to APPROVE with one condition [ 1 Recommendation to DENY Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: FINANCE: PZAB Action: Growth Management: [ ] Approved Planning Manager .Talal M. Benothman ( Costs: $ [ ] App. w/ conditions Project Manager Total [ ] Denied City Attorney Joyce C. Cai [ ] Rec. approval Christine Tatum Planner $ [ ] Rec. app. w/ conds. Finance Administrator [X] Quasi — Judicial Current FY [ ] Rec. Denial Allan Owens [ ] Legislative [ ] Continued to: [X] Public Hearing Funding Source: Development Compliance Attachments: Bahareh Keshavarz - Wolfs, Advertised: Date: 01/13/06 [ ]Operating [X] Other NA . Ordinance 1, 1990 • Letter from Palm Paper: Palm Beach Post Beach County Traffic Growth Mana ement Division dated Administra *04 [X] Required Budget Acct. #: 12/19/05 Charles K. ✓ [ ]Not Required . Table 1 N/A Approved By: City Manager Affected Parties: [X] Notified Ronald M. Ferris [ ] Not Required Date Prepared: January 15, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: PCDA- 05 -11- 000001 Y'0 TARGETED EXPEDITED PERMITTING PROGRAM As determined by the City Council, a new Section 78 -57 of Code of Ordinances was created entitled "Targeted Expedited Permitted Program" in accordance with the Policy 13.1.1.6 of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 13.1.1.6 states, in part, that "The City shall maintain and develop programs to encourage and facilitate the expansion and relocation of target industries in the City including but not limited to: Implement a targeted expedited permitting program for companies that are expanding operations or moving into the city so that value -added employment may be created at a faster pace..." Section 78 -57 entitled "Targeted Expedited Permitted Program" was created to provide a legal basis to prioritize economic development projects in the land development review process without compromising the integrity of the City's Comprehensive Plan or Land Development Regulations. This petition and its companion petition SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 (Anspach Site Plan Amendment) have qualified for the Targeted Expedited Permitting Program for economic development, and have been accelerated through the review process pursuant to Ordinance 1, 2006. BACKGROUND • The NorthCorp Planned Community Development (PCD) has 107 acres in size and is located North of Burns Road, South of PGA Blvd., East of Interstate 95 and.West of Alternate AIA. It was originally approved on January 18, 1990, with the adoption of Ordinance 1, 1990, which united all lands comprising the plats of NorthCorp Center, RCA Blvd. Center, West Park Center and South Park Center (the entire lands comprising the former RCA site) into one (1) development order. The original ordinance also provided for an approval mechanism for future petitions within the PCD, assigned site - specific restrictions to certain lots, established maximum trip generations for the development, and established time - certain conditions of approval for certain road and drainage improvements. The NorthCorp Center, originally built in 1960, consists of 373,000 square .feet of various uses such as office, industrial, school, bank, health club and etc. The six -acre RCA Blvd. Center consists of two (2) lots - RCA #1 (2.74 acres) and RCA #2 (2.94 acres). The 73,480 square feet /116 room Hampton Inn and 30,000 square feet Hilda Flack Interior are currently located on Lot #1 and Lot #2, respectively. The 42 -acre South Park Center consists of thirteen lots (lots 1 through lot 13) and one water management tract. Currently, each lot has been developed with either an office, light industrial or warehouse use, except lots 1, 5 and 12. Lots 5 and 12 are currently vacant, but have been approved for office buildings. Lot 1, which is the companion petition, is proposed to be developed for office and light industrial uses. The 14 -acre West Park Center consists of two (2) lots and one water management tract. Lot 1 Date Prepared: January 15, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: PCDA- 05 -11- 000001 • (7.69 acres) was developed with 121,229 square feet of office use (Wackenhut). Lot 2 (3.98 acres) was also developed with an existing 49,155 square feet of light industrial use (Anspach). The 1.98 -acre water management tract is located between lots 1 and 2. Pursuant to condition 22(1) of Ordinance 1, 1990, the entire property is vested with a maximum trip generation of 6,063 daily trips or 962 PM peak hour trips for all building constructions within the RCA Blvd. Center, South Park Center and West Park Center. Based on a traffic generation analysis prepared by the applicant's traffic engineer and approved by the -Palm Beach County Traffic Division and the City Engineer,. 827 PM peak hour trips have been used for all the existing developments and the proposed development for lot 1 of South Park Center (the companion petition SLPN- 05 -11- 000003). Sixty -two (62) PM -peak -hour trips, the equivalent to 40,800 square feet of office use, are reserved for future development on lot 9. As a result, 73 PM- peak -hour trips or 47,500 square feet of additional office use remain available for future construction within the PCD, without exceeding the maximum allowed trips as established by the Ordinance 1, 1990. LAND -USE AND ZONING The future land -use designation of the subject site as reflected on the City's Future Land Use Map is Industrial (1). The zoning classification of the site is a Planned Community District (PCD) Overlay with an underlying zoning of Research and Light Industrial Park (M1). • The existing land uses and zoning designations of properties surrounding the subject PCD are provided in the following table: 10 ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS, LAND -USE DESIGNATIONS h MOAN °R � aa4 ,� y��e � u Subject Property Research and Light Industrial Park (M 1)/ Industrial (1) NortbCorp PCD Planned Community Development District (PCD) North Gardens Station East Mixed Use District (MXD) Mixed Use Development (MXD) Gardens Station West General Commercial District (CG1) Commercial (C) Mariott Hotel South Burns Road Professional and Office building Professional and Office District (PO) Professional /Office (PO) Warehouse buildings Light Industrial District (M 1 A) Industrial (1) Office building Public and Institutional (PA) Public /Institutional (P) Municipal building Date Prepared: January 15, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: PCDA- 05 -11- 000001 PROPOSED AMENDMENT The applicant is requesting to amend the development order for the NorthCorp PCD to allow the modification and. addition of certain conditions of approval of Ordinance 1, 1990 to be consistent with the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance of Palm Beach County. To establish consistency with the current Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, a text • change is being proposed to Condition # 22.I of Ordinance 1, 1990, as noted below. Condition #22.I to be amended as follows: "Plats of West Park Center and Plats of South Park Center 1. The maximum trip generation for new construction approved in the Plat of West Park Center together with the development approved in the Plat of RCA Boulevard Center and in the Plat of South Park Center, shall not exceed si* theiisand sixty t4ee (6063) daily trips nine hundred seventy -seven (977) AM peak hour, or nine hundred sixty -two (962) PM peak hour trips ("Maximum D UTIT TfW "Maximum AM Peak Hour Trips" and "Maximum PM Peak Hour Trips ", respectively). 2. Any applicant appearing before the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board and the City Council shall provide a calculation of the daily peak hour trips associated with the proposed project. A calculation of the 441�-AM and PM peak hour trips shall be undertaken utilizing the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) `Trip Generation', Feur-th Edit; ,r as required by the County Traffic Performance Standards. The proposed amendment will continue to allow an entitlement of 96,441 square feet of additional office and light industrial development from the existing and approved .uses for the • overall PCD without exceeding the maximum PM peak hour trips specified in the condition # 4 z�i East Alt AIA Residential Medium (RM) Catalina Lakes Residential Medium Density District (RM) West Interstate 95 Admiralty II (Radisson Hotel) General Commercial District (CG1) Commercial (C) Union Square Residential High Density District (RH) Residential High (RE) Gardens Park Public and Institutional District (P /I) Recreation /Open Space (ROS) PBG Business Park Research and Light Industrial Park District (M 1) Industrial (I) PROPOSED AMENDMENT The applicant is requesting to amend the development order for the NorthCorp PCD to allow the modification and. addition of certain conditions of approval of Ordinance 1, 1990 to be consistent with the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance of Palm Beach County. To establish consistency with the current Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, a text • change is being proposed to Condition # 22.I of Ordinance 1, 1990, as noted below. Condition #22.I to be amended as follows: "Plats of West Park Center and Plats of South Park Center 1. The maximum trip generation for new construction approved in the Plat of West Park Center together with the development approved in the Plat of RCA Boulevard Center and in the Plat of South Park Center, shall not exceed si* theiisand sixty t4ee (6063) daily trips nine hundred seventy -seven (977) AM peak hour, or nine hundred sixty -two (962) PM peak hour trips ("Maximum D UTIT TfW "Maximum AM Peak Hour Trips" and "Maximum PM Peak Hour Trips ", respectively). 2. Any applicant appearing before the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board and the City Council shall provide a calculation of the daily peak hour trips associated with the proposed project. A calculation of the 441�-AM and PM peak hour trips shall be undertaken utilizing the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) `Trip Generation', Feur-th Edit; ,r as required by the County Traffic Performance Standards. The proposed amendment will continue to allow an entitlement of 96,441 square feet of additional office and light industrial development from the existing and approved .uses for the • overall PCD without exceeding the maximum PM peak hour trips specified in the condition # 4 • 22.1 of the Ordinance 1, 1990. is Date Prepared: January 15, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: PCDA- 05 -11- 000001 As stated in the applicant's trip generation analysis, since the time of the approval of Ordinance 1, 1990, the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance has been amended to require that any amendments to previously approved projects, such as NorthCorp PCD, consider only on whether the peak hour trips associated with the proposed amendment are equivalent to or less than the trips from the previous approvals. Ordinance 1, 1990 establishes the number of daily and PM peak hour trips that have been vested for the property. The applicant's trip generation analysis has been reviewed and approved by both the Palm Beach County Traffic Division and the City Engineer, and has been determined, to be consistent with Ordinance 1, 1990 and the County's Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of Petition PCDA - 05 -11- 000001 with the following condition: 1) The maximum daily trip limit of 6,063 trips established in Ordinance 1, 1990 shall continue to be enforced by the City of Palm Beach Gardens. (City Engineer) 5 Date Prepared: January 15, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: PCDA- 05 -11- 000001 • TABLE 1 The NorthCorp PCD was approved with the following summary: Proposed Expansion Existing and Approved Uses Total (square feet) (square feet) (square feet) Office 63,775 380,193 443,968 Industrial 32,666 129,511. 162,177 Hotel none 116 -room 116 -room Design Center none 15,000 15,000 Warehouse none 50,000 50,000 Self Storage none 80,600 80,600 The afore - mentioned traffic concurrency approval allows an,entitlement of 63,775 square feet of office use and 32,666 square feet of light industrial use with a total of 96,441 square feet for the proposed PCD developments without exceeding the 962 PM peak hour trip threshold. Consequently, the applicant has allocated 57 PM peak hour trips /16,275 square feet of office use and 32,666 square feet of light industrial use to lot 1 of South Park Center (companion petition) and reserved 62 trips /40,800 square feet of office use for lot 9 with 73 trips/ 47,500 square feet of office use remaining for any future development within NorthCorp PCD. • PM Peak Hour Trips Equivalent to Building (RCA Center Blvd., Square Feet South Park Center & West Park Center) Reserved for lot 1 of S. Center Park 25 16,275 - Office (Anspach- Total: 48,941 Square Feet) 32 32,666 - Light Industrial 48,941 Available: 73 47,500 SUBTOTAL: 130 96,441 (Office: 63,775 square feet Industrial: 32,666 square feet) Used 770 116 -room - Hotel 15,000 - Design Center 50,000 - Warehouse 380,193 - Office 129,511 • - Industrial 80,000 - Self Storage Reserved for lot 9 of S Center Park 62 40,800 - Office TOTAL: 962 116 -room - Hotel 15,000 - Design Center 50,000 - Warehouse 443,968 - Office 162,177 - Industrial • 80,000 - Self Storage on Department of Engineering and Public Works P.O. Box 21229 West Palm Beach, FL 33416 -1229 (561) 684 -4000 www.pbcgov.com Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Tony Masilotti, Chairman • L. Greene, Vice Chairperson Karen T Marcus Jeff Koons Warren H. Newell Mary McCarty Burt Aaronson County Administrator Robert Weisman • "An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer" r December 19, 2005 • CITY OFPALM BEACH GARDENS DEC 2 7. '2005 Mr. Michael Sanchez PLANNING & ZONING DEPT. Principal Planner City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 RE: Anspach, Lot 1 and Lot 2 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW Dear Mr. Sanchez: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement for the expansion of the Anspach development located within the Northcorp PCD, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. The project is summarized as follows: Location: west side of Alternate A1A between RCA Blvd. and Burns Rd. Municipality: Palm Beach Gardens Existing and Approved Uses: 116 -room Hotel; 15,000 sf Design Center; 50,000 sf Warehouse (Lot # 9); 380,193 sf Office; 129,511 sf Industrial; and 80,600 sf Self Storage New Proposal: 116 -room Hotel; 15,000 sf Design Center; 50,000 sf Warehouse (Lot # 9); 443,968 sf Office; 162,177 sf Industrial; and 80,600 sf Self Storage New Daily Trips: 0 (this is an equivalency) New PH Trips: 0 (this is an equivalency) Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the revised development plan of the previously approved Northcorp PCD meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County because it does not exceed the " 962 maximum PM peak hour trips" specified in Condition # 22 of City of Palm Beach Gardens Ordinance 1, 1990. However, the Traffic Division has the following recommendations with respect to Development Order conditions: 1) Condition # 22 of the current Development Order (City Ordinance 1, 1990) also specifies a 6063 maximum daily trip limit. Although a daily trip standard is no longer part of the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, it is still part of this condition and can be enforced by the municipality. 2) Although specified by Condition # 22, the use of the 4`h .Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) book "Trip Generation" to calculate trip generation volumes is not consistent with the current Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. However, due to the absence of a Master Plan identifying an approved set of land uses and quantities at the time of the original 1990 year project approval, the 41h Edition was determined to be an appropriate means to arrive at this vesting information. Page 2 3) To establish consistency with the current Traffic Performance Standards, the following changes are recommended to Condition #_22.1. Plats of West Park Center and Plats of South Park Center: : " 1. The maximum trip generation for new construction approved in the Plat of West Park Center together with the development approved in the Plat of RCA Boulevard Center and in the Plat of South Park Center, shall not exceed six thousand sixty three (6063) daily trips, nine hundred seventy -seven (977) AM peak hour, or nine hundred sixty -two (962) PM peak hour trips ("Maximurn Daily TFips! "Maximum AM Peak Hour Trips" and "Maximum PM .Peak Hour Trips ", respectively). 2. Any applicant appearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council shall provide a calculation of the daily and peak hour trips associated with the proposed project. A calculation of the da*- M and PM peak hour trips shall be undertaken utilizing the latest edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) 'Trip Generation' ,FauFth caul^:, as required i by the County Traffic Performance Standards." 4) The County traffic concurrency approval is subject to the Project Aggregation Rules set forth in the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. 1 n If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684- 4030. • Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Allan A. Ennis, P.E., AICP Assistant Director - Traffic Division cc: Lorin Brissett, P.E., Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. Tammy Lee, Palm Beach County Deputy County Engineer's Office File: 'General - TPS - Mun -Traffic Study Reviews F:I TRAFFIC 1malAdmin\Approvals1051221.doc • 4 4 `~ January 18, 1990 • ORDINANCE 1, 1990 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CURRENT ZONING FROM M -1, RESEARCH AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO PCD AND PUB ZONING WITH UNDERLYING ZONING OF M -1, ON ALL LANDS COMPRISING THE PLATS OF NORTHCORP CENTER, RCA BOULEVARD CENTER, WEST PARK CENTER AND SOUTH PARK CENTER (THE ENTIRE LANDS COMPRISING THE FORMER RCA SITE); AND, PROVIDING THAT SUBSEQUENT APPROVALS SHALL BE BY RESOLUTION WITHOUT NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION OF NOTICE BEING REQUIRED; AND, PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Zoning upon the lands known as "The Former RCA Site" located within the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof is hereby amended from M -1, Research and Light Industrial Park District, to PCD. The underlying zoning shall be and the .same is hereby designated as that set forth in the M -1; Research and Light • Industrial Park District, City of Palm Beach Gardens Zoning Code. Section 2. Attached hereto as Composite Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof are plats prepared by Hutcheon Engineers as follows: Plat of NorthCorp Center, Plat of RCA Boulevard Center; Plat of West Park Center and Plat of South Park Center. The PCD consisting of the aforesaid described plats (Former RCA Site) heretofore approved by the City, shall be developed in accordance with the said plats, the Development Orders and Conditions of approval entered and approved by the City on January 18, 1990. Further, each lot within the foregoing plats is hereby designated as a Planned Unit Development and the individuals Planned Unit Developments are hereby created. Section 3. Impact fees shall be paid.by the developers of the individual Planned Unit Developments as set forth in any appli -' cable ordinance, law rule or regulation of any governmental body with jurisdiction over the property development. • • • • Section 4. Development of the individual Planned Unit Devlopments within the Planned Community District shall proceed in accordance with the said Development Orders and Conditions of Approval of January 18, 1990 attached to the Plat of West Park Center and the Plat of South Park Center; and the general conditions as hereinafter setforth: 1. Maximum floor area ratio (FAR) on the overall PCD project shall not exceed 38 %. 2. Minimum front yard setback for all buildings shall be: A. 25' for a one (1) or two (2) story, or 25' high struc- ture. B. An additional one (1) foot setback for.each three (3) additional feet of building height above 251. 3. Height restrictions: Lots 4 & 13 (South Park Center) 6 stories Lots 1 & 2 (RCA Blvd. Center) 8 stories Northcorp Center Site & Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 (South Park Center) 30 stories Lot i (West Park Center) & Lots 1, 2, 3 (South .Park Center 12 stories Lot 12 (South Park Center) no development permitted unless site is compatable to use of parcels 8,9, and 10, as approved by the City Council. 4. Minimum Open Space* requirements: Stories Open Space 1 - 4 28.0% 5 28.5%. 6 29.0% 7 29.5% 8 30.0% 9 31.25% 10 32.50% 11 33.75% 12 35.0% *Open Space is defined as living plant . material, water, and landscaped plazas, as determined by the City Council. 5. A. Antennas and microwave dishes shall be subjected to specific PUD review.for screening. B. All roof - mounted equipment shall be totally screened. 6. The uses as outlined in Condition 21 shall be. limited to 5% of the total approved square footage for the PCD and at any time during the development, no more than 10% shall be allowed. 7. No retail or commercial on the first 250' north of Burns Road. -2- • 8. A 30 =foot wide landscape buffer along Burns Road with a berm average three feet in height and planting. 9. Lot coverage (structures) shall not exceed 40% of the site area for a two (2) story building and shall be decreased by 2.5% for each additional floor of height above two stories (Example: 10 stories; 50 - 8 (2.5) = 20 %). • 10. A 7' pathway (east /west) along Burns Road, from I -95 to Alternate A -1 -A, shall be constructed or bonded by the property owner prior to final plat approval. 11. Traffic impact fees must be paid in accordance with the Palm Beach County Traffic Impact Ordinance. 12. City Council, in conjunction with the Developer(s), shall determine community facilities impact fees and the timing of payment for: A. Recreation B. Police C. Fire Property owner prior to the first building permit being issued within the PCD, shall pay $75,000 for community impact, which amount shall be credited against any future police and fire impact fees assessed against any development within the PCD. 13. The Property Owner or successors must comply with the DER consent order. 14. Building floors will be protected from the 100 year - 3 day, zero discharge storm event. Roadways will be protected from the 10 year - 1 day storm event. Parking lots will be pro- tected from the 3 year - 1 day storm event. 15. Prior to the final surface water management calculations, applicant will provide the size and location of the culverts along Burns Road and I -95, and provide for any off -site drainage. 16. The stormwater run -off from RCA Boulevard will need to be directed into the on -site stormwater management system in the final design. 17. The off -site drainage ditches that serve the project will need to be cleaned of debris, vegetation, and backfill prior to issuance of the first building permit, on any parcel except the Northcorp Center site. 18. The existing corrugated aluminum weir (riser) will need to be replaced prior to issuance of the first building permit, on any parcel except the Northcorp Center site. 19. The littoral planting shall be installed along the water retention area on the west side of the project if required by S.F.W.M.D. 20. The Property Owner will continue a uniform streetscape con- tinuity along all R.O.W. A streetscape /buffer plan for this PCD shall be presented to the City Council for approval by subsequent resolution prior to the issuance of approval of the first PUD. - 3 - 21. The following are uses allowed with the submission of each PUD, in addition to industrial and office and other M -1 uses: (Please see Condition 6 for clarity) 1. Retail: Wearing Apparel Toys Sundries Jewelry Camera /Photos Florist Gift Shop Delicatessen Bakery . Office Equipment Food and Drug Sales (each food or drug store shall be limited to a maximum of 5,000 sq. ft.) 2. Service Establishments: Barber /Beauty Shop Shoe Repair Laundry /Dry Cleaner Print Shop Travel AGency Employment Office Restaurant Health Club 3. Hotel /Motel - One allowed in the project, limited to a a maximum of 120 guest rooms or suites or combination of rooms and suites. 4. Art Gallary, Museum, Dance, Art or Music Studio. 5. Retail sale of beer and wine if in conjunction with • restaurant or convenience store. 6. Day Care Center. 7. gar /Liquor Store, when approved by Resolution of the City Council. B: Laundromat 9. Car Wash 10. Fraternal Organization 11. Commercial Recreation including ancillary driving ranges. 22. Kahart Pinder's conditions from his letter dated 1 -8 -90, and recommendation 1- 18 -90, as follows: I. Plats of West Park Center and Plats of South Park Center 1. The maximum trip generation for new construction approved in the Plat of West Park Center together with the development approved in the Plat of RCA Boulevard Center in the Plat of South Park Center, shall not exceed six thousand sixty -three (6,063) daily trips, or nine hundred sixty -two (962) PM peak hour trips ( "Maximum Daily Trips" and "Maximum PM Peak Hour Trips ", respectively). 2. Any applicant appearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council shall provide a calculation of the daily and peak hour trips associated with the proposed project. A calculation of the daily • and PM ,peak hour trips shall be undertaken utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) "Trip Generation ", Fourth Edition. - 4 - (d) Prior to the issuance of any building permits or series of building permits for any land uses generating more than three thousand, five hundred sixty -nine .(3,569) daily trips or five hundred sixty -six (566) PM peak hour trips for any uses on the presently undeveloped lots in the Plat of RCA Boulevard Center, the Plat of West Park Center and the Plat of South Park Center: Contract let for construction of one eastbound right -turn lane at the intersection of Burns Road and Alternate A -1 -A, together with an extension of the storage lane for the single left -turn lane, and one westbound right - turn lane at the intersection of Burns Road and Military Trail. These improvements shall be complete and open to the public prior to issuance of any certificates of occupancy for any land uses generating more than three thousand five hundred sixty -nine (3,569) daily trips or five hundred sixty - six (566) PM peak hour trips from the undeveloped lots in the above referenced plats. - 5 - 1I. Plat of West Park Center • Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building for any land use in Lot 1, Plat of West Park Center, the construction contract shall have been let for the following road improvement and open to the public prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy on said Lot 1: (a) Addition of one (1) eastbound, left -turn lane to provide dual left -turn lanes at the intersection of RCA Boulevard and Alternate A -1 -A. III. Plat of South Park Center Prior to the issuance of building permits and /or cer- tificates of occupancy for any building on certain lots within the Plat of South Park Center as more fully detailed below, certain road improvements shall be under contract and /or complete and open to the public as follows:' (a) Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any land uses on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7, the Contract let for construction of West Park Drive as a-two lane as well as single northbound, southbound, eastbound and westbound left -turn lanes at the intersection of Burns Road with Riverside Drive /West Park Drive. (b) Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any land uses on Lots 7, 8, or 9, the Contract let for construction of the extension of_NorthCorp Parkway in a two lane section easterly to its proposed terminus at East Park Drive. These improvements shall be complete and open to the public prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy for land • uses on the foregoing Lots 7, 8, and 9. (c) Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any land uses on Lots 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, or 13, the Contract let for construction of East Park Drive in a two lane section including one additional westbound right -turn lane as well as single eastbound and southbound left -turn lanes at the intersection of Burns Road and East Park Drive. These improvements shall be complete and open to the public prior to Issuance of any certificates of occupancy for land uses on the foregoing Lots 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, or 13. (d) Prior to the issuance of any building permits or series of building permits for any land uses generating more than three thousand, five hundred sixty -nine .(3,569) daily trips or five hundred sixty -six (566) PM peak hour trips for any uses on the presently undeveloped lots in the Plat of RCA Boulevard Center, the Plat of West Park Center and the Plat of South Park Center: Contract let for construction of one eastbound right -turn lane at the intersection of Burns Road and Alternate A -1 -A, together with an extension of the storage lane for the single left -turn lane, and one westbound right - turn lane at the intersection of Burns Road and Military Trail. These improvements shall be complete and open to the public prior to issuance of any certificates of occupancy for any land uses generating more than three thousand five hundred sixty -nine (3,569) daily trips or five hundred sixty - six (566) PM peak hour trips from the undeveloped lots in the above referenced plats. - 5 - 1-11 1_1� • (e) Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any undeveloped lots in the Plat of South Park Center, the contract shall be let for installation of a traffic signal at the Burns Road and Riverside Drive /West Park Drive intersection including all appropriate pavement markings, signing, lighting and the like as approved by Palm Beach County, if warranted. IV. All parcels within the Plat of South Park Center, shall provide a signal warrant study to determine if signaliza- tion is required at the intersection of Burns Road with Riverside Drive /West Park Drive. The signal warrant study shall be based on a time frame coincident with the build- out of all development with the Plat of South Park Center, the Plat of West Park Center and the Plat of RCA Boulevard Center and shall include the total traffic generated by all previously approved projects in the Plat of RCA Boulevard Center, the Plat of West Park Center and the Plat of South Park Center as well as traffic generated by those approved projects included in the traffic study for these plats. Only the construction of the eastbound right -turn lanes at the Burns Road /Alternate A -1 -A intersection and the west- bound right -turn lane at the Burns Road /Military Trail intersection shall be considered off -site improvements. All other improvements are site related. Additional Right of Way Dedication In addition to the right -of -way dedicated on the PLAT of SOUTH PARK CENTER, the Developer, prior to plat recordation, shall dedicate such additional right -of -way as may be required for the reconstruction of the intersection of Burns Road with Alternate A -1 -A generally described as a maximum of an additional 35 feet • beginning at the intersection for a distance of 400 feet west of the intersection with a taper to 0 feet at a point approxima- tely 830 feet west of the intersection. Provided, however, once plans are approved for the intersection, should any right - of -way which is conveyed not be required for construction of the intersection, any excess land shall be immediately reconveyed to the property owner or his successors and assigns. 23. Prior to the submittal of each PUD application the Petitioner or agent will meet on site with the City Forester to review the site conditions which the City forester wishes to be addressed in the site plan. . 24. Site Plan Review /PUD - No land clearing or tree removal be allowed without written approval of the City Forester. In addition, pursuant to the PCD Plan, the owners of the properties may designate and develop areas not subject to PUD review and approval, only upon field inspection and written approval of the City Forester. As part of the application for each PUD approval, the following shall be submitted: (a) Tree survey and tree analysis prepared by a registered landscape architect or similarly qualified professional, which for trees with a caliber of three inches or more describes type of tree, location, caliber, and whether it will be removed, replaced, or relocated. (b) All existing Oak trees with a caliber of eight inches or greater will be preserved and protected during construction. • - 6 - 25. The Property Owner agrees and is obligated to include or cause to be included the property ( "Property ") in any unit of develop- • ment, special district, community development district or local unit of special purpose government created by a duly constituted governmental entity ( "Special District ") for the purpose of planning, establishing, acquiring, constructing, reconstructing, enlarging, extending, equipping, operating, or maintaining water management or roads and associated facilities, benefiting the Property and all or part of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida; provided, however, that all assessments for such facilities shall be imposed on a uniform basis applied pro -rata to all property benefited by the Special District. (i.e., acre by acre or residence by residence) and shall be determined in accordance with the applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regu- lations of the State of Florida, County of Palm Beach and the City of Palm Beach Gardens. Provided further, that upon.. creation of any Special District it must be demonstrated by the Special District that direct benefit is accrued to the Property and the direct benefit to the Property as determined by the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, and any costs incurred by the Property by reason of Other sections of this requirements shall be credited to the Property by such Special District. The owners of the Property shall be given not less than 120 days prior written notice before formation of any Special District and shall be entitled to participate in all proceedings relating.to the Special District including the right to appeal any determination of benefit to•the Property. 26. Prior to recording a Final Plat, 50% of the Cost of construction of an at grade pedestrian crossing and signalization at the Community Center on Burns Road, must be paid to the City. 27. A Helipad shall be a permitted use in this PCD. Section 5. Review of subsequent developments on the individual • PUDs shall be by the City's Planning and Zoning Commission and by the City Council, and approval shall be by Resolution. A Public Hearing and publication of notice in a newspaper of general circulation for the meetings on subsequent Resolutions shall not be required. Section 6. If any part or portion of this Ordinance shall be found to be invalid by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Ordinance shall remain in full force and legal effect. Section 7. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. passage. • Section 8. This Ordinance shall be effective upon date of - 7 - • • PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS 4th DAY OF JANUARY, 1990. PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS 18th DAY OF JANUARY, 1990. PLACED AND ADO D THIS 18th DAY OF JANUARY, 1990. { ✓;� MAYOR �'C?UNCI VICE MAYOR I NCI A COUNCILMAN ATTEST: L.L -TND�4 V. - KOSIER,, "CITY CLERK -8- i • • NOTICE OF PROPOSED ENACTMENT OF AN ORDINANCE BY TITLE ONLY BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that on Thursday, January 18, 1990, at 8:00 P.M.,- or as soon thereafter as can be heard, the City Council of Palm Beach Galydens, Florida, in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex, 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, will con- sider the following Ordinance on Second and Final Reading and proposed passage thereof: ORDINANCE 1, 1990 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CURRENT LAND USE FROM M -1 INDISTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT TO PCD AND PUD ZONING CON ISTING OF MIXED LAND USE IN ALL LANDS COMPRISING THE PLATS OF "THE NORTHCORP CENTER," "THEI RCA BOULEVARD CENTER" WEST PARK CENTER AND SOUTH PARK CENTER (THE ENTIRE LANDS COMPRISING THE FORMER RCA COMPLEX); AND PROVIDING FOR SURETY FOR THE COMPLETION OF REQUIRED INFRASTRUCTURES ON SIT AND OFF SITE; PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL FOR SIT USE PLAN; SUBJECT TO THE GENERAL CONDITIONS CONTAINED THEREIN; PROVIDING THAT CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT APPROVALS SHALL BE RESOLVED WITHOUT INT$RVENTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION OF NOTICE BEING REQUIRED; AND, PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL'ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCE IN CONFLICT HERWITH AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE HER OF. Said proposed Ordinance may be inspected by members of the public in the Office of the City Clerk located at the Municipal Complex during regu- lar business hours, Monday through Friday, 8 :00. A.M. - 4:30 P.M. PLEASE TAKE.NOTICE AND BE ADVISED, that if any-interested person desires to alipeal any decision made by the City Council with respect to any matter considered at this hearing, such interested person will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to ensure a ver- batim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testi- mony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.. PLEASE PUBLISH: January 3,.1990 PALM BEACH POST LINDA V. KOSIER CITY CLERK CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS ■ ' f ' _ 7�1 tscxllrrlcxf �,/ Vat portion of �ectiom 1 and 17 In '1L� rLahtp 47 Frnhlh, I:,rra^ 17 Fiat together with that potion of Section 7 in Ibmiship 42 Sartll, Pniry 41 Past • in Falm dead' ctxmty, Florida descrllxl ns n wimle as fnlJ ..*r i Oomtenclrg at Northwest corner of said Section It llrrrr Solrth 02'00'06" West alotgi Net 11be of said Section a diatatrea of Sn.nn feat to a point on the line of R.C.A. Pall ward, ifmtmrly lhrrt 10"1) ns row laid out and In use, said point t-h-q the r'Oittl (It nlh1llOW1ft :; 'h- )v-South 88.08118" Fnst long said South lily -, he)ig ,Jm a lily p•nnll ^i ailh acrd Southerly 50.00et Iro1G tFW- North liter o[ slid Snr-1 i•nr 7, .11 ^•t nlr-r oC 664.50 fart; Ur�tic� ibrth 1'50'79" F.iet alfnq lid -Oh Ihr , rli ^tarn» oC 20,00 le2tt tretncn Sorith 88'08119" Fast alnnq amid Srndh I1rr n rlt•htnrr•e of 268.79 feet to t$e Westerly Right of Wny 1 hr of f h•r 0-I rn-• rr,rst R,lllm -Irl; Ulence Sout1li 13'39123" Ea-t nlotrg c'n)d Westerly lirr n 111••In,r-n of 7710.00 feet to the f rtherly line of CUttta Rr,,YI na ir•J Ini•I r 11t and In n••^; thence tlorthe8 °1653" West along said Northerly lien a dt,tnrrn ^f ls40.61 feet to a point all a non talge�ht nave Lr Ill^ Gnstrr Il 1 in^ ,d 1 - "�, IState R>ad Ib. 9), raid `e being ootr:rve 5•uth:,ateell, h, ii.l n ra•lina of 7964.03 feet, a radi 1 to said point Mora Ilnrth nr','77'rr" r, -t: thnrr -e lforthrrly a distance c f 1765.25 feet ahoy,j c-ri•l cihr:^ tnrl -60 ra•I ^rly line through a control "]a of 25.28139 "; thrir -n tlnrUr In Oy'•tr U-t. nl ^+n mid r-interly line a dists ice of 294.99 feet; th^nx] Ilnrth % 1 " ? ;, ' 11n. -1 al,,nq said Msterly line a istanoe of 1171.18 U-t to th- lint th 1 hr rf t h6 Sf7hth 310.OU t^et of said S lon li thence Sahth 80.10154" Flat nlntrg raid IJotth Ill)- a clivtance of B 0.05 feet to the Wlr t line, or C1,te P11111 t�pitttrrht Arc %n Rend as descrIed in Parcel C of the dead recomlr l III ih-*hk 11,3f), large 447 of official RecoxIs of said Falm beaclh County; trptr-e Sraltlr ln•13'44" r;ist along "Id West line and thepoutrerly prolagat)rnn th ^rMjf A dlatarrce of 'iRR ll feet to said South line of R.C.A. Jlwlevnid, Mifrg ml— n line itirallel with and therly 50.00 feet from Use Sahth Jlry of tn)rl Section 1; thence South 88.1 156" East along said South line a distance of 245.84 feet to the Form OF �FJOIII"=. F.f(.mm drat portion thereof described as follows: "inning at the intersection of the North line of said Sa1tr 310.00 fret of id Sectlonjl with the West line of said States Reid Dry rtment Trews Rood; thence th 10013'44" East along said West lily n dlstnnce of ,08.00 feet; thence th 79046116" West a. distance of 278.00 fr^t: thetas South 10013144" Fast distance of 348.00 feet; thatroFc+lth 79046116" West a distnirfr- of 411.71 feet to said Easterly line of 1 -951 tlrtrr Iletth 74022172" West alongIsaid Easterly line n distance of 623.90 f^ct to Uun flortli lily_ of the South 310.00 feet of said Sectim 1; Urerr_p South • 00010'56" Fist a distance of 810.05 fry,t to Uw MIT nF Mamilir;. Cmtainirg 96.53 Acre more or less. rnm_EI, 2: That portion of Section 1, Torlhahlp 42 South, (arum 1, r,•-1 I-t-thrr with that portion of Section 6, Tauship 47 South, Pmrl^ •hr I,••I in rhlm f-rldl Canty, Florida} described as a Aiolr ns folly*: Ctx - ncirrg at ie Southeast rnnrr of s. -iid fz- ti,•tr 1' Ih ^nn Ilnrth 1 "5q•0!," Fast along F`�Via Fast line of s.-11,1 Srrtinn n '11^•tair-n M IM nn f^et to n i»int on a limlp-hrallel with roxl lloith -rly 1,n•nn r^,•r frr.I thn Furth lit- of slid Section 1, said point 1y,- -ins the 11,1fif r,I IftrhltgllTY *: tirtre flot-Ul 80010'56" West �Iong said parallel ] i1r, i,eilq nl- Ill- 11 -tth i irr- of R.C.A. Umlowird Jfory,rrly Monet Road) a dJstarr_e of Ife 2; f-f- fn rho Flat lirr_ of State Road rtnrtrt Access Pond as desrritwl ill Iti.rrl v rf the deed recorded in book 1530, Page 447 0f official R,xC T l- of "li,l I-11m Pnlch minty; UtPrice North) 10013144" West along Gild Finn. 1 irr i di -tan- of 245.41 fe^t to tow lr th rUh line of e Sfmrth c; 790.00 fc^t of �,i•i -Harr 1; Uretrx South 88010'56' Fast along s-+ld Ilorth Illy, a ,liatnir^ of 7i%tn feat to UP Intersection df the East line of amid Sdtinn l frith tilellnrth litr of the South 290.00 feet of said Section 6: thMi_n gnrth nn ^n"'tn" Fnat aloirg Said tforth line of Ule South 290,00 fret of Sn00 SK-tirar 6, n rliatnIxP of 694 77 feet to tl e Westerly Right of way l :rrr of Flnrirll Fa t Cnlat Rlilrm•i: thence Sou 13036'46" Fnat 11"g "old Wnsfnrll bin^ n d1• -tmr_n of 74h.03 feet to a ifile forallel with nnl flotth ^rly So.rnr font frn'r Ill Spith lihn of said Section 5, • Urence North Itn0081111 Wnst nlnm s,irl p1mll -I lily' L-ing Also the North line of said R.C. A. Fvtilevanl, n di•-tnn-n ^f 98173 fret t0 thy- POlifr OF tEGitUI1J;G. _ ronta)nirq 6.17 Acres) morp or less 40 OF FLOjIDA ) •STATE k ) SS: COUNTY OF PALM BEACH ) The; foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I�TH day of January , 1990 by Ole Lunde, Vice president, and Donald W. Blankman Secretary of FIRST AMERICAN EQUITY - P�G.A. Corp., a Florida corporation, and general partner oft PBG DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, who executed the foregoing instrument as general partner of PBG DEVELOPMENT. ASSOCIATES 4nd they acknowledged before me that they executed same for theipurposes herein expressed. i NOTARY PUBLIC State of Floridd My Commission Expires: s •STATE OF FLOAIDA ) SS: COUNTY OF Thei foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me { this day of 19 , by JOHN C. BILLS, President, and JOHN C. BILLS, Secretary of JOHN C. BILLS DEVELOPMENT CORP., a Florida corporation, and general partner of I r PBG DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, who executed the foregoing instru- ment as general partner of PBG DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES and they s acknowledged, before me that they executed same for the purposes herein expresjsed. I NOTARY PUBLIC State of Florida My Commission Expires: I NOTARY PUBLIC. STATE OF FLORIDA': MY COMMISSION EXPIRES. APRIL I2; I991, BONDED THAU NOTppy PUALjC UNDER WpTEAB. i I i • WAIVER OF NOTICE I PBG iDEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, a Florida general partner- I ' ship, hereby i waives its right to notice pursuant to Section 166.041(3)(c),! Florida Statutes, pertaining to any notice which i would be required for the rezoning of the property description attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A" from M1, Research and Light Industrial Park district, to PCD with lots within the PC9 to be designated as individual PUD's. i PBG,DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, a Florida general partnership By: FIRST AMERICAN EQUITY - PGA Corp., a Florida corporation, and ! general partner.of PBG DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES I WITNESSES: • Ole Lunde, Vice President ATTEST: iarrj.zA lad'..:f�m�+t� Donald W.- Blankman, Secretary JOHN C. BILLS DEVELOPMENT CORP., a Florida corporation and general partner of PBG DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES WI ESSES: / t !� JOHN C. BILLS, President t �/ ATTES I secr_etary • f K.� I � • t -d CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD Agenda Cover Memorandum Date Prepared: January 13, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 Subject /Agenda Item: Petition SPLN- 05 -11- 000003: Anspach Site Plan Amendment Public Hearing/Recommendation to City Council: A request by Cotleur &Hearing, Inc., agent for Anspach Holdings, Ltd., for an amendment to the previously approved site plan to allow approval of a 48,941 square -foot building, located on Lot 1 of the 7.0 -acre site, which comprises Lot 1 of the south park center plat and lot 2 of the west park center plat in the NorthCorp Planned Community Development (PCD). The subject site is generally located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Riverside Drive and NorthCorp Parkway. [ X ] Recommendation to APPROVE with two waivers and conditions 1 X l Recommendation to DENY one waiver Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: FINANCE: PZAB Action: Growth Management: [ ] Approved Planning Manager Costs: $ N/A [ ]App. w/ conditions Talal M. Benothman Project Manager Total . [ ] Denied City Attorney Joyce C. Cai [ ] Rec. approval Christine Tatum Planner $ N /A, [ ] Rec. app. w/ conds. Finance Administrator Current FY [ ] Rec. Denial [X] Quasi - Judicial Allan Owens [ ] Legislative [ ] Continued to: [ ] Public Hearing Funding Source: Development Compliance Attachments: Bahareh Keshavarz- Wolfs, Advertised: Date: 01/13/06 [ ] Operating [X] Other. NA • Ordinance 1, 1990 • Resolution 47, 1992 Paper: Palm Beach Post • Resolution 11, 2005 Growth Madage nt • Prop osed Plans Administra ] Required • Table 2 Charles K. [X] Not Required Budget Acct. #: is N/A Approved By: City Manager Affected Parties: [ ] Notified ; Ronald M. Ferris [ X] Not Required d Date Prepared: .January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -1 1- 000003 • TARGETED EXPEDITED PERMITTING PROGRAM As determined by the City Council, a new Section 78 -57 of Code of Ordinances was created entitled "Targeted Expedited Permitted Program" in accordance with the Policy 13.1.1.6 of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 13.1,.1:6 states, in part, that "The City shall maintain and develop programs to encourage and facilitate the expansion and relocation of target industries in the City including but not limited to: Implement a targeted expedited permitting program for companies that are expanding operations or moving into the city so that value -added employment may be created at a faster pace..." Outlining the Targeted Expedited Permitting Program, Ordinance 1, 2006 was created to provide, a legal basis to prioritize economic development projects in the land development review process without compromising the integrity of the City's Comprehensive Plan or Land Development Regulations. 3 This petition with a companion petition PCDA= 0541- 000001 (NorthCorp PCD amendment) has qualified for the Targeted Expedited Permitting Program for economic development, and has been accelerated in the reviewing process pursuant to Ordinance 1, 2006. ECOMOMIC IMPACT ON AD- VALOREM TAXES - Based on a conservative estimate of $400 per a square foot construction cost for a Research/Development building and based on current ad- valorem tax rate of 5.928 mills, the • Anspach expansion would generate approximately'$ 116,049. 00 additional revenue annually. v This is subject to change, depending upon actual construction cost. A full RIMS-II analysis will be performed (calculating impact of job creation,. insularly support jobs, purchase of machinery, etc.) once final numbers are established.. 0 BACKGROUND The subject site consists of lot 1 of South Park Center (lot 1) and lot 2 of West Park Center (lot 2) and is bounded by Interstate. 95 to the west, Northcorp Parkway to the" north, lot 2 of South Park Center to the south and Riverside Drive to the east. Lot 1 and lot 2 are located within the NorthCorp Planned Community Development (PCD), which was originally approved on. January 18, 1990, with the adoption of Ordinance 1, 1990. Ordinance 1, 1990 united all lands comprising the plats of NorthCorp Center, RCA B vd. Center, West Park Center and South Park Center (the entire lands comprising the former RCA site) into one development order: The original ordinance provided for an approval mechanism for future petitions within the PCD, assigned' site-specific restrictions to certain lots, established maximum trip generations for the development, and established time - certain conditions of approval for certain road and drainage improvements. 2 Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 • The original site plan for the subject site was approved by the City Council through the adoption of Resolution 47, 1992, which permitted an increase of 7,500 square feet to the existing building consisting of 25,985 square feet. Subsequently, Resolution 107, 1992 approved a wall mounted building sign, and on September 23, 1997, an administrative approval granted a 17,032 square - foot Phase II expansion to the building as well as changes to the landscape plan. The most recent approval was on January 20, 2005, when the City Council adopted Resolution 11, 2005 to allow for a new building with 17,270 square feet of light industrial use to be built on lot 1 of the South Park Center, which is the south portion of the site. LAND -USE AND ZONING The future land -use designation of the subject site as reflected on the City's Future Land Use Map is Industrial (I). The zoning classification of the site is Planned Community District (PCD) Overlay with an underlying zoning of Research and Light Industrial Park (M1). The subject site is located at the intersection of Riverside Drive and NorthCorp Parkway within the NorthCorp Planned Community Development. For a complete listing of adjacent uses, land use designations and zoning districts, please refer to Table 1. • Table 1 • Anspach Building on north Subject Property portion (lot 2) Vacant on south portion (lot 1) PCD/ Ml- Research and Light Industrial I I - Industrial Water Management Tract PCD/ North (W -1) Ml- Research and Light Industrial I - Industrial NorthCorp Center across NorthCorp Parkway Design Center on Lot 2 of S. PCD/ South Park Center M1- Research and Light Industrial I - Industrial (Decorators/Keebler) Light Industrial Building on East Lot 6 & 7 across Riverside Dr. (Implant Innovations) PCD/ Ml- Research and Light Industrial I — Industrial 1�1 Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 PROJECT DETAILS The subject site consists of 7.0- acres and is located on lot 1 of South Park Center and lot 2 of West Park Center, within the NorthCorp PCD. Lot 2 contains an existing 49,155 square -foot building, which is being used for production services, research and professional offices associated with the Anspach Company. With this petition, the applicant is seeking an approval for the construction of a new building with 48,941 square feet on lot 1, the southern portion of the site. The proposed building will replace the 17,270- square- foot -un -built building approved on January 20, 2005, through the adoption of Resolution 11, 2005. In this application, the proposed building will provide 32,666 square feet of light industrial use and 16,275 square feet of office use to accommodate the growth and operation expansion of the Anspach Company specializing in the production of high -speed instrumentation for Neurosurgery, Neurotology, Otology and Orthopedics. • The additional 48,941 square -foot building will be allocated from an entitlement of the remaining 96,441 square feet of the overall PCD, which has .been requested through a PCD amendment filed concurrently with this petition. Access The site will continue to have the existing ingress and egress access onto Riverside Drive and NorthCorp Parkway. An additional access point with exit only was proposed by the applicant with this petition, which is located near the southeast corner of the site for vehicle delivery purpose. The additional 12 -foot wide access will be 135' south of the main entrance to the subject site. The proposed curb cut will require an interruption of an otherwise continuous landscape buffer along Riverside Drive. In staff's professional opinion, due to its close proximity to the existing entrance and interruption of the continuous R/W landscape buffer, the proposed additional access point is not warranted. Staff suggests that the applicant utilize or expand the existing ingress and egress access to meet the needs of the new building. Landscaping The minimum open space is 28% as required by condition 4 of the Ordinance 1, 1990. The applicant has provided 42.71%. The applicant is required to provide a total of 12,373.2 points of • landscaping for the site; the applicant has provided 14,209 landscape points (9,118 existing 4 {l.�d. ♦ ( i9� � } J: �a 1ia.. 3 t 5 d�fS { k a ;{ - � t � d -. Crt � { '. i � �`� 6',�ti d tt K i �}' {{w (� j � ? #� '� § A# Y eta' M1 4 � {. t f k y4 �Fy�. ; ki�,y � { � S�'? '4� 5 _ �, T i �1m'k k Y 'k �'h.. �?!-44 1 •° West Gardens Park across I -95 P/I - Public or Institutional ROS - Recreation Open Space PROJECT DETAILS The subject site consists of 7.0- acres and is located on lot 1 of South Park Center and lot 2 of West Park Center, within the NorthCorp PCD. Lot 2 contains an existing 49,155 square -foot building, which is being used for production services, research and professional offices associated with the Anspach Company. With this petition, the applicant is seeking an approval for the construction of a new building with 48,941 square feet on lot 1, the southern portion of the site. The proposed building will replace the 17,270- square- foot -un -built building approved on January 20, 2005, through the adoption of Resolution 11, 2005. In this application, the proposed building will provide 32,666 square feet of light industrial use and 16,275 square feet of office use to accommodate the growth and operation expansion of the Anspach Company specializing in the production of high -speed instrumentation for Neurosurgery, Neurotology, Otology and Orthopedics. • The additional 48,941 square -foot building will be allocated from an entitlement of the remaining 96,441 square feet of the overall PCD, which has .been requested through a PCD amendment filed concurrently with this petition. Access The site will continue to have the existing ingress and egress access onto Riverside Drive and NorthCorp Parkway. An additional access point with exit only was proposed by the applicant with this petition, which is located near the southeast corner of the site for vehicle delivery purpose. The additional 12 -foot wide access will be 135' south of the main entrance to the subject site. The proposed curb cut will require an interruption of an otherwise continuous landscape buffer along Riverside Drive. In staff's professional opinion, due to its close proximity to the existing entrance and interruption of the continuous R/W landscape buffer, the proposed additional access point is not warranted. Staff suggests that the applicant utilize or expand the existing ingress and egress access to meet the needs of the new building. Landscaping The minimum open space is 28% as required by condition 4 of the Ordinance 1, 1990. The applicant has provided 42.71%. The applicant is required to provide a total of 12,373.2 points of • landscaping for the site; the applicant has provided 14,209 landscape points (9,118 existing 4 Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 0 points and 5,091 proposed points). The undeveloped portion of the site is currently vegetated with pine trees. The applicant is required to replace with equal amount of vegetation around the property. The; proposed building will also require a relocation of existing conservation easements. One 7,649 square feet/0.17 acres conservation easement has been proposed to be located along the south property line. The City Forester has reviewed the proposed relocation of the conservation easements and found that several issues have not been satisfied at this time. However, the applicant is working to address these issues prior to City Council review. The most significant issue is that the applicant's proposal to replant plant material is NOT an acceptable tree mitigation to ensure no net loss of plant material. Staff has being working diligently with the applicant and will continue to work with the applicant to resolve all the outstanding landscaping issues. The proposed development plan provides a 20- foot -wide landscape buffer along Riverside Drive that includes a 12 -foot wide drainage easement, which is proposed to be abandoned by the applicant. The landscape buffer along the western property line is required to be 15 feet in width based upon PCD Streetscape /Buffer Landscape Plan approved on Sept. 17, 1992 through the adoption of Resolution 65, 1992. The proposed development plan provides for a buffer in excess of 15 feet with existing and new trees proposed by the applicant. Along the south property line, an 8- foot -wide buffer is proposed and is consistent with code requirements. Site Li ghting • Prior to City Council review the applicant will submit a signed and sealed photometric plan to the City Engineer for review and approval. Parking The applicant is proposing to provide a total of 197 parking spaces on the site. The minimum number of spaces required by Code is 190 spaces, based on a ratio of one space per 1,000 square feet of light industrial use (Laboratory, Industrial Research and Development) and one space per 250 square feet of office. The total number of handicapped parking spaces required is six (6); the applicant has provided six (6). The number of the provided parking spaces for the entire site is 197, which is 3.68% more but 10% less than the minimum code requirement; therefore, a waiver is not required pertaining to the number of parking spaces exceeding the minimum requirement. Since the applicant has provided 2.99 acres /42.71 % of open space, which is 1.03 acres /14.71 % more than the required, no additional open space is needed for the increase in a number of parking spaces. The petitioner has requested a waiver as it relates to a parking width dimension. The requested waiver is to allow for 9.5- foot -wide parking spaces instead of 10- foot -wide parking spaces as specified by Section 78- 344(1) of the LDRs. According to Section 78- 344(1)(2) of the LDRs additional pervious open space at a ratio of 1.5 sq. ft. is required to be provided for every square foot of reduced paved parking area. This would require 1,512.38 square feet of additional open is space to be located within the same parking facility. The petitioner has provided 1,359.75 5 Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 • square -foot additional open space. However, a shortage of 152.63 square feet of open space is required to be provided to meet the criteria as outlined in the code. Staff will continue to work with the applicant to ensure its compliance with the code requirement regarding the additional open space for the reduction in parking space dimension. Traffic Concurrency The proposed expansion is consistent with the County's Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance and the City's Traffic Concurrency. The County's Traffic Division and the City's Engineer have raised no issues with respect to traffic. The project is located within the NorthCorp Planned Community Development, which has 962 PM peak hour trips vested for the South Park Center, North Park Center and RCA Blvd. Center. The applicant's traffic impact statement indicates that the proposed 48,941 square -foot addition on the subject lots 1 will generate 57 new PM peak hour trips. 73 trips will remain available for future developments in the NorthCorp PCD. Said traffic statement was reviewed and approved by the Palm Beach County Traffic Division and City's traffic engineer. Architecture The proposed building will have three stories with flat roof and 52 -11' in height to the highest point of the parapets and 60 -11" to the top, of the entrance features framing the center of the • building on both the east and west fagades. On the east fagade, a covered canopy is also proposed extending 20' -6" feet from the main entrance emphasizing the central entry to the building. Along the front/east fagade of the proposed building, a covered walkway; intended for weather protection, was also proposed above a seven -(7) -foot wide sidewalk running from the south end of the proposed building to the south fagade of the existing building. The proposed building is generally consistent with the existing building with respect to architectural style, building materials, and color. Sim The applicant is proposing to provide a principal tenant sign with 36" letter height on the third floor of the west elevation facing I -95, as well as a tenant sign with 24" letter height on the third floor of the east elevation facing Riverside Drive. According to Section 78 -285 entitled "Permitted Signs ", the applicant is allowed one wall sign. The applicant has requested two (2) waivers to: a) allow for one (1) additional tenant sign with 24" letter height on the east elevation facing Riverside Drive; b) allow for the installation of the two wall signs to be above the second floor line. The applicant has also proposed a new monument sign to be located at the main entrance along Riverside Drive. The style of the proposed sign will be the same as the existing monument sign located at the site entrance along NorthCorp Parkway.. The proposed monument sign is • permitted because the site meets the frontage criteria as required for a second ground sign pursuant to Section 78 -285 of the LDRs. • Art in Public Places 1�1 Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 The applicant has indicated that the construction cost of the proposed building will exceed one- million dollars and therefore the Art in Public Places requirement is applicable to the proposed development. The applicant has elected to pay cash in lieu of 'providing art as permitted by Section 78 -261 of LDRs. Waivers WAIVERS REQUESTED Code Required/ Provided Requested Recommendation Section Allowed Waiver Section 78- 344(1): Parking 10'X 18.5' 9.5'X 18.5' 0.5' foot in width Support (1) Stall width Section 78- 344(h): off- 100' minimum 30' stacking 70' deviation at the Support (2) street parking & stacking distance distance at the main main entrance loading entrance along along Riverside Dr. entrances and Riverside Dr. exits Section 78 -285, Only one (1) Waiver to allow for Table 24'. tenant wall sign Two tenant wall one (1) additional Denial (3) Permitted signs allowed signs tenant wall sign Section 78 -285 Tenant wall sign Tenant wall signs Tenant wall signs to Table 24: not higher than the to be on third floor ; -be on third floor of Support (4) Permitted Signs second floor line of building building 1) Staff recommends approval as a majority of the existing parking on =site is 9' X 18', as approved by the original submittal. Additionally, the applicant has provided 1,359.75 square feet of additional open space (1,512.38 square feet required by code). The applicant is working with staff to provide the needed 194.25 square feet of additional open space to meet the code requirement for the requested parking width reduction. 2) Staff recommends approval as the ingress /egress already exists on site. Same waiver was approved in the previous petition for a 17,270 square -foot new building through the adoption of Resolution 11, 2005. 3) Staff recommends denial as the existing,building on site already provides signage along I- 95. Since there is no signage along the east elevation of the existing building facing Riverside Drive. Staff recommends the principal tenant sign with 36" letter height as permitted by the code to be installed on the east elevation of the proposed building. 4) Staff recommends approval considering that a) the proposed building setbacks 230 feet from the east property line abutting Riverside Drive; b) the proposed sign on a third floor will not impose an adverse visual impact but rather will provide an adequate name recognition for • visitors entering the subject site. r� u • Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 with the following conditions and three waivers. City Engineer 1. The applicant shall provide the City with copies of all' permitr applications, permits, certifications and approvals. (City Engineer) 2. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit', applicant shall provide a cost estimate for the project, including public infrastructure and all landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the City in. order to establish surety. The cost estimate shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and landscape architect registered in the state of Florida.. Surety will be based on. 110% of the total combined approved cost estimates and shall be` posted with the City, prior to the the of the first building permit. In accordance with Section 78 -309 & 78 -461 of the LDR. (City Engineer) 3. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land. alteration permit, the applicant shall provide a cost estimate for the on -site project improvements, not including public infrastructure, or landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the City. The cost estimate shall be signed and sealed by an engineer'registered in the state of Florida and shall be posted with the City prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit. (City Engineer) 4. The construction, operation and /or maintenance of any elements of the subject project shall not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage of surrounding areas. If, at any time during the project development, it is determined by the City that any of the surrounding areas are experiencing' negative drainage impacts caused by the project, it shall be the applicant's responsibility to cure said impacts in a period of time and a manner acceptable to the City prior to additional construction activities. (City Engineer) 5. The applicant shall comply with all Federal EPA and State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection NPDES permit requirements, including but not limited to,. preparation of a stormwater pollution prevention plan and identification of appropriate Best Management Practices, as generally accepted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and /or local regulatory agencies,'for construction activities, submission of a Notice of Intent to EPA or their designee, implementation of the approved plans, inspection and maintenance of controls during construction, and submission of a Notice of Termination. (City Engineer) 6. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, applicant shall schedule a pre - permit meeting with City staff. (City Engineer) 8 A n Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 • 7. Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the applicant shall provide to the City with letters of authorization from the applicable utility companies allowing landscaping and light poles to be places within the utility easements. (City Engineer) City Forester 8. Prior to scheduling this petition for City Council review, the site plan and landscape plan shall be revised to provide for the protection of three large Oak trees located in the southeast corner of the site as required per condition 24 (b) of Ordinance 1, 1990. (City Forester) 9. Prior to scheduling this petition` for City Council review, the site plan and landscape plan shall be revised to provide for. the protection of a minimum 199 caliper inches of Pine trees. (City Forester) 10. Prior to scheduling this petition for City Council review, the site plan and landscape plan shall be revised to provide a protection of a minimum of sixteen Oak trees by relocating there from the existing parking lot area to the wester buffer to immediately screen the I -95 wall from the proposed building. (City Forester) 11. Prior to scheduling for City Council review, landscape plan shall be revised to provide a protection of five pine trees that are located within the drainage easement near the southwest corner, and plant a minimum of five Cypress trees of varying sizes along the embankment of • the proposed detention area. (City Forester) 12. If any tree protection is altered by any future approvals for drainage, or utility construction work, the City shall require tree relocation or mitigation of three new caliper inches for everyone lost. (City Forester) 13. Prior to the scheduling of City Council review, the applicant shall revise the point calculations for the proposed landscape material to the satisfaction of the City Forester. (City Forester) 14. Prior to the scheduling of City Council review, the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to include one additional cluster of three palms along the north and south faeades of the proposed building. (City Forester) 15. Prior to the scheduling of City Council review, the applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to include 1,493 square feet of additional open space as required for an increase in a number of parking spaces pursuant to Section 78- 345(d) of the LDRs. This can be accomplished by installing additional tree diamonds within the parking area and adding pedestrian amenities. (City Forester) 16. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the property owner shall replace all landscaping removed due to death, disease, damage, insect - infestation, or hurricane as shown on the approved landscape plan for the north parcel. (City Forester) 0 Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 • 17. Prior to the issuance of the land alteration permit, the applicant shall erect and maintain protective barriers around the drip line of existing trees adjacent to the proposed improvements. All work shall be inspected and approved,by the Landscape Architect of Record and the City Forester. (City Forester) 18. Prior to the scheduling of City Council review, the applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to show the location for a possible future generator along with required landscape material to screen the generator from view. (City Forester) 19. Prior to the scheduling of City Council review, the applicant shall revise the site data table to reflect the total amount of open space provided on the site, which is 2.99 acre's or 42.71 %. (City Forester) Police Department 20. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official. (Police Department) a) The developer/ project manager after site clearing and placement of construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be limited to, temporary lighting, security • personnel, vehicle barriers, construction/visitor pass, reduce /minimize entry /exit points, encourage sub contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working environment. b) The security management plan shall be maintained throughout the construction phase of the project. Non= compliance with the approved plan shall result in a stop -work order for the entire planned unit development. 21. Metal halide lighting shall be used for alongside /under /adjacent to proposed walkway cover (Police Department) Miscellaneous 22. The Property owner shall be required to -notify the City's Public Works Division via fax at least 10 working days prior to the commencement of any work/construction activity within any public right -of -way within the City of Palm Beach Gardens. In the case of .a city right - of -way, the property owner has at least five working days to obtain a right -of -way permit. Right -of -way permits may be obtained at the Building Division. Failure to comply with this condition could result in a Stop Work Order of all work/construction activity within the public right -of -way and the subject development site. (Public Works) 23. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the City shall receive documentation from the applicant that two existing drainage easements located in the middle of the 7.0 -acre site and • along the Riverside Dr. are abandoned. (City Engineer & City Forester) 10 Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: . January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 • 24. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall re -plat the site. (City Engineer). 25. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant is required to comply with the Art - in- Public - Places requirement by depositing an amount of money equal to the art fee into an escrow account or make a payment in lieu thereof. The Art-in- Public- Places Advisory Board shall review and make a recommendation to the City Council on any proposed art on site. - (Planning & Zoning) 26. Required digital files of approved plat in its entirety transformed to NAD 83 State Plan Coordinate System shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Division prior to issuance of the first building permit. Approved civil engineering as -built design and architectural drawings shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Division prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. (GIS Manager, Development. Compliance) Waivers: Staff recommends approval of the following requested waivers:: 1. The waiver request from Section 78- 344(Ll),. entitled "Parking stall and bay dimensions, to allow for 9.5- foot -wide parking spaces. 2. The waiver request from Section 78 -344, entitled "Stacking Distance ", to allow for a reduction in the required 100 -foot stacking distance, to allow for a 30 -foot stacking distance. 3. The waiver from Section 78 -285, Table 24, entitled "Permanent Signs ", to allow for a tenant wall sign to be installed on third floor of the proposed building along the east elevation facing Riverside Drive. Staff recommends denial of the following requested waiver: 1. The waiver from Section 78 -285, Table 24, entitled "Permanent Signs ", to allow for an additional tenant wall sign on the west elevation of the proposed building facing I -95. 11 Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -1 1= 000003 • Table 2: Consistency with Ordinance 1, 1990 and LDRs 1] • * Note: Where there is a difference, the Ordinance 1, 1990 takes the precedence. 12 Proposed Plan Ordinance 1, 1990 Code Consistency Requirement Use Light Industrial Industrial, Office, PCD and subject and Office other M -1 uses and to Ordinance 1, YES uses under item 21 1990 of condition of approval 24.5% Max. 38% n/a YES Max. Floor Area Ratio (including the - overall PCD proposed bldg.' Sq. Ft. on lot 1) Max. Lot Coverage 21.5% 37.5% 40% * YES Min. Front setback 195'— Proposed 34.3' 25' * YES Bldg. Min. Rear Setback 81.4' — Proposed n/a 20' YES Bldg. Min. Side Setback 110.7' - Proposed n/a 15' YES Bldg. Max. Bldg. Height/ 52' -11 "/ 3 stories 12 stories — lot 1 of 50' * YES Stories south park center Min. Open Space 42.71% 28 % 15 % * YES * Note: Where there is a difference, the Ordinance 1, 1990 takes the precedence. 12 January 18, 1990 • ORDINANCE 1, 1990 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA,. AMENDING THE CURRENT ZONING FROM M -1, RESEARCH AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO PCD AND PUD ZONING WITH UNDERLYING ZONING OF M -1, ON ALL LANDS COMPRISING THE PLATS OF NORTHCORP CENTER, RCA BOULEVARD.CENTER, WEST PARK CENTER AND SOUTH.PARK. CENTER (THE ENTIRE LANDS COMPRISING -THE FORMER RCA SITE); AND, PROVIDING THAT SUBSEQUENT APPROVALS SHALL BE BY RESOLUTION WITHOUT NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION OF NOTICE BEING REQUIRED; AND, PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Zoning upon the lands known as "The Former RCA Site" located within the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and More particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof is hereby amended from M =1, Research and Light Industrial Park District, to PCD. The underlying zoning shall be and the same is hereby designated as that set forth in the M -1, Research and Light • Industrial Park District, City of Palm Beach Gardens Zoning Code. Section 2. Attached hereto as Composite Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof are plats prepared by Hutcheon Engineers as follows: Plat of NorthCorp Center, Plat of RCA Boulevard Center; Plat of West Park Center and Plat of South Park Center. The PCD consisting of the aforesaid described plats (Former RCA Site) heretofore approved 'by the City, shall be developed in accordance with the said plats, the Development Orders and Conditions of approval entered and approved by the City on January 18, 1990. Further, each lot within the foregoing plats is hereby designated as a Planned Unit Development and the individuals Planned Unit Developments are hereby created. Section 3. Impact fees shall be paid by the developers of the individual Planned Unit Developments as set forth in any appli -' cable ordinance, law rule or regulation of any governmental body.with jurisdiction over the property development. a Section 4. Development of the individual Planned Unit • Devlopments within the Planned Community District shall proceed in accordance with the said Development Orders and Conditions of Approval of January 18, 1990 attached to the Plat of West Park Center and the Plat of South Park Center; and the general conditions as hereinafter setforth: 1. Maximum floor area ratio (FAR) on the overall PCD project shall not exceed 38 %. 2. Minimum front yard setback for all buildings shall be: A. 25' for a one (1) or two (2) story, or 25' high Struc- ture. B. An additional one (1) foot setback for each three (3) additional feet-of building height above 251. 3. Height restrictions: Lots 4 & 13 (South Park Center) 6 stories Lots 1 & 2 (RCA Blvd. Center) 8 stories Northcorp Center Site & Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; 11 (South Park Center) 10 stories Lot 1. (West Park Center) & Lots 1, 2, 3 (South Park Center 12 stories Lot 12 (South Park Center) no development permitted unless site is compatabte to use of parcels 8,9, and 10, as approved by the City Council. 4. Minimum Open Spate* requirements: ' Stories Open space 1 - 4 28.0:,1 5 '28.5% 6 29.0% 7 29.5% 8 30.0% 9 31.25% 10 32.50% 11 33.75% 12 35.0% *Open Space is defined as living plant material, water, and landscaped plazas; as determined by the City Council. 5. A. Antennas and microwave dishes shall be subjected to specific PUD review for screening. B. All roof - mounted equipment shall be totally screened. 6. The uses as outlined in Condition 21 shall be limited to 5% of the total approved square footage for the PCD and at any time during the development, no more than 10 %'shall;be allowed. • 7. No retail or commercial on the first 2501. north of Burns Road. 2 8. A 30 -foot wide landscape buffer along Burns Road with a berm • average three feet in height and planting. 9. Lot coverage (structures) shall not exceed 40% of the site area for a two (2) story building and shall be decreased by 2.5% for each additional floor of height above two stories (Example: 10 stories; 50 - 8 (2.5) = 20 %). • 10. A 7' pathway (east /west) along Burns Road, from I -95 to Alternate A -1 -A, shall be constructed or bonded by the property owner prior to final plat approval. 11. Traffic impact fees must be paid in accordance with the Palm Beach County Traffic Impact Ordinance. 12. City Council, in conjunction with the Developer(s), shall determine community facilities impact fees and the timing of payment' for: A. Recreation B. Police C. Fire Property owner prior to the first building permit being issued within the PCD, shall pay $75,000 for community impact, which amount shall be credited against any future police and fire impact fees assessed against any development within the PCD. 13. The Property Owner or successors must comply with the DER consent order. 14. Building floors will be protected from the 100 year - 3 day, zero discharge storm event. Roadways will be protected from w the 10 year - 1 day storm event. Parking lots will be pro- tected from the 3 year - 1 day storm event. 15. Prior to the final surface water management calculations, applicant will provide the size and location of the culverts along Burns Road and I -95; and provide for any off -site drainage. 16. The stormwater run -off from RCA Boulevard will need to be directed into the on -site stormwater management system in the final design. 17. The off -site drainage ditches that serve the project will need to be cleaned of debris, vegetation, and backfill prior to issuance of the first building permit, on any parcel except the Northcorp Center site. 18, The existing corrugated aluminum weir (riser) will need to be replaced prior to issuance of the first building permit, on any parcel except the Northcorp Center site. 19. The littoral planting shall be installed along the water retention area on the.west side of the project if required by S.F.W.M.D. 20. The Property Owner will continue a uniform streetscape con- tinuity along all R.O.W. A streetscape /buffer plan for this PCD shall be presented to the City Council-for approval by subsequent resolution prior to the issuance of approval of the first PUD. - 3 - 21. The following are uses allowed with the submission of each PUD, in addition to industrial and office and other M -1 uses: • (Please see Condition 6 for clarity) 1. Retail: Wearing Apparel Toys Sundries Jewelry Camera /Photos Florist Gift Shop Delicatessen Bakery Office Equipment Food and Drug Sales (each food or drug store shall be limited to a maximum of 5,000 sq. ft.) 2. Service Establishments: Barber /Beauty Shop Shoe Repair Laundry /Dry Cleaner Print Shop , Travel AGency Employment Office Restaurant Health Club 3. Hotel /Motel - One allowed in the project, limited to a a maximum of 120 guest rooms or suites or combination of rooms and suites. 4. Art Gallary, Museum, Dance, Art or Music Studio. 0 5. Retail sale of beer and wine if in conjunction with restaurant or convenience store. 6. Day Care Center. 7. Bar /Liquor Store, when approved by Resolution of the City Council. B. Laundromat 9. Car Wash 10. Fraternal Organization 11. Commercial Recreation including ancillary, driving ranges. 22. Kahart Pinder's conditions from his letter dated 1 -8 -90, and recommendation 1- 18 -90, as follows: I. Plats of West Park Center and Plats of South Park Center 1. The maximum trip generation for new construction approved in the Plat of West Park Center together with the development approved in the Plat of RCA Boulevard Center and in the Plat of South Park Center, shall not exceed six thousand sixty -three (6,063) daily trips, or nine hundred sixty -two (962) PM peak hour trips ( "Maximum Daily Trips" and "Maximum PM Peak Hour Trips ", respectively). 2. Any applicant appearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council'shall provide a calculation of the daily and peak hour trips associated with the proposed project. A calculation of the daily • and ^PM peak hour trips shall be undertaken utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) "Trip Generation ", Fourth Edition. -4- II. Plat of West Park Center • Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building for any land use in Lot 1, Plat of West Park Center, the construction contract shall have been let for the following road improvement and open to the public prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy on said Lot 1: (a) Addition of one (1) eastbound, left -turn lane to provide dual left -turn lanes at the intersection of RCA Boulevard and Alternate A -1 -A. III. Plat of South Park Center Prior to the issuance of building permits and /or cer- tificates of occupancy for any building on certain lots within the Plat of South Park Center as more fully detailed below, certain road improvements shall be under contract and /or complete and open to the public as follows: (a) Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any land uses on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7, the Contract, let for construction of West Park Drive as a two lane as well as single northbound, southbound; eastbound . and westbound left =turn lanes at the intersection of Burns Road with Riverside Drive /West Park Drive. (b) Prior to the issuance of any building permits.for any land uses on Lots 7, 8, or 9, the Contract let for construction of the extension of NorthCorp Parkway in a two lane section easterly to its proposed terminus at East Park Drive. These improvements shall be complete and.open to the public prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy for land ® uses on the foregoing Lots 7, 8, and 9. (c) Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any land uses.on Lots. 4,, 5, 8, 9, 10, .11, 12, or 13, the Contract let for construction of.East Park Drive in a two lane section including one'additional westbound right -turn lane as well as single eastbound and southbound left -turn lanes at the intersection of Burns Road and East Park Drive. These improvements shall be complete.and open to the public prior to issuance of any certificates of occupancy for land uses on the foregoing Lots 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, or 13. (d) Prior to the issuance of any building permits or series of building permits for any land uses generating more than three thousand, five hundred sixty -nine (3,569) daily trips or five hundred sixty -six (566) PM peak hour trips for any uses on the.presently undeveloped lots in the Plat of RCA Boulevard Center, the Plat of West Park Center and the Plat of South Park Center: Contract let for construction of one eastbound right -turn lane at the intersection of Burns Road and Alternate A -1 -A, together with an extension of the storage lane for the single left -turn lane, and one westbound right - turn lane at the intersection of Burns Road and Military Trail. These improvements shall be complete and open to the public prior to issuance of any certificates of occupancy for any land uses generating more than three thousand five hundred sixty -nine (3,569) daily trips or five hundred sixty - six (566) PM 'peak hour trips from the undeveloped lots in the above referenced plats. -5- I-' 1_/ (e) Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any • undeveloped lots in the Plat of South Park Center, the contract shall be let for installation of a traffic signal at the Burns Road and Riverside Drive /West Park Drive intersection including all appropriate pavement markings, signing, lighting and the like as approved by Palm Beach County, if warranted. . , IV. All parcels within the Plat of South Park Center, shall provide a signal warrant study to determine if signaliza- tion is required at the intersection of_Burns Road with Riverside Drive /West Park Drive. The signal warrant study shall be based on a time frame coincident with the build - out of all development with the Plat of South Park Center, the Plat of West Park Center and the Plat of RCA Boulevard Center and shall include the total traffic generated by all previously approved projects in the Plat of RCA Boulevard Center, the Plat of West Park Center and the Plat of South Park Center as well as traffic generated by those approved projects included in the traffic study for these plats. Only the construction of the eastbound right -turn lanes at the Burns Road /Alternate A -1 -A intersection and the west- bound right -turn lane at the Burns Road /Military Trail intersection shall be considered off -site improvements. All other improvements are site related. Additional Right of Way Dedication In addition to the right -of -way dedicated on the PLAT of SOUTH PARK CENTER, the Developer, prior to plat recordation, shall dedicate such additional right -of -way as may be required for the reconstruction of the intersection of 'Burns Road with Alternate A -1 -A generally described as a maximum of an additional 35 feet beginning at the intersection for a distance of 400 feet west ® of the intersection with a taper to 0 feet at a point approxima- tely 830 feet west of the intersection. Provided, however, once plans are approved for the intersection, should any right- of -way which is conveyed not be required for construction of the intersection, any excess land shall be immediately reconveyed to the property owner or his successors and assigns. 23. Prior to the submittal of each PUD application the Petitioner or agent will meet on site with the City Forester to review the site conditions which the City forester wishes to be addressed in the site plan. 0 24, Site Plan Review /PUD - No land clearing or tree removal be allowed without written approval of the City Forester. In addition, pursuant to the PCD Plan, the owners of the properties may designate and develop areas not subject to PUD review and approval, only upon field inspection and written approval of the City Forester. As part of the application for each PUD approval, the following shall be submitted: (a) Tree survey and tree analysis prepared by a registered landscape architect or similarly qualified professional, which for trees with a caliber of three inches or more describes type of tree, location, caliber, and whether it will be removed, replaced, or relocated. (b) All existing Oak trees with a caliber of eight inches or greater will be preserved and protected during construction. - 6 - 25. The Property Owner agrees and is obligated to include or cause to be included the property ('=Property ") in any unit of develop- ® ment, special district, community development district or local unit of special purpose government created by a duly constituted, governmental entity ( "Special District ") for the purpose of planning, establishing, acquiring, constructing, reconstructing, enlarging, extending, equipping, operating, or maintaining water management or roads and associated facilities, benefiting the Property and all or part of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida; provided, however, that all assessments for such facilities shall be imposed on a uniform basis.applied pro -rata to all property benefited by the Special District (i.e., acre by acre or residence by residence) and shall be determined in accordance with the applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regu- lations of the State of Florida, County of Palm Beach and the City of Palm Beach Gardens. Provided further, that upon creation of any Special District it must be demonstrated by the Special District that direct benefit is accrued to the Property and the direct benefit to the Property as determined, by the %Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, and any costs incurred by the Property by reason of other sections -of this requirements shall be credited to the Property by such Special District. The owners,of the Property shall be given not less than 120 days prior written notice before formation of any Special District and shall be entitled to participate in all proceedings relating to the Special District including the right to appeal any determination of benefit to the Property. 26. Prior to recording a Final Plat, 50% of the Cost of construction of an at grade pedestrian crossing and signalization at the Community Center on Burns Road, must be paid to the City. 27. A Helipad shall be a permitted use in this PCD. Section. 5. Review of subsequent developments;on'the individual PUDs shall be by the City's Planning and Zoning Commission and by the City Council, and approval shall be by Resolution. A Public Hearing and publication of notice in a newspaper of general circulation for the meetings on subsequent Resolutions shall not be required. Section 6. If any part or portion of this Ordinance shall be found to be invalid by a Court of competent jurisdiction,' the remainder of the Ordinance .shall remain in full force and legal effect. Section 7. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. passage. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be effective upon date.of - 7 - • PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS 4th DAY OF JANUARY, 1990. PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS 18th DAY OF JANUARY, 1990s PLACED AND ADO D THIS 18th DAY OF JANUARY, 1990. MAYOR C UNCILWOMAN VICE MAYOR WIC NCI A COUNCILMAN ATTEST: L,KND/l1 V. -COSIER, CITY CLERK —8— i • • IWO RESOLUTION 47, 1992 June 2, 1992 June 40 1992 June 18, 1992 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF.PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, CREATING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS "THE ANSPACH EFFORT" ON LANDS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, LOCATED IN THE NORTHCORP CENTER, A PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT, CREATED BY ORDINANCE 1, 1990; AND, PROVIDING THAT SAID PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH HEREIN, WITH AN- UNDERLYING ZONING OF M -1 RESEARCH AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT; AND, FURTHER PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: Section 1. A Planned Unit Development known as "THE ANSPACH EFFORT" is hereby created on lands described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, located in the NORTHCORP CENTER, a Planned Community District, created by ordinance 1, 1990. The underlying zoning for said Planned Unit Development,shall be M -1 Research and Light Industrial Park District. Section 2. Development of this Planned Unit.Development shall be subject to the plans and specifications and conditions as hereinafter set forth: A. Plans and Specifications: 1. Site Plan prepared by Jones & Song, dated April 30, 1992, consisting of one sheet marked Al. 2. North, South, East and West Elevations, prepared by Jones & Song, dated April 17, 1992, consisting of one sheet marked A5. 3. Landscape Plan prepared by The SWA Group, dated May 1, 1992, and consisting of one sheet marked LS -1. 4. Landscape for Phase 2 West Elevation Plan prepared by the SWA Group dated 6/9/92 consisting of Sheet 1 of 2. 5. Additional Landscape for East Service Area Plan prepared by the SWA Group dated 6/9/92 consisting of Sheet 2 of 2. 6. Landscape Plan at Main Entrance prepared by The SWA Group dated 6/3/92, consisting of Sheet l of 1. U B. Conditions: 1. The five -foot sidewalks proposed on the ® subject property along Northcorp Parkway and Riverside Drive shall be constructed prior to the issuance of the Certificate of occupancy. 2. The property owner or successors and assigns shall,comply with condition 25 of Section 4 as set forth in ordinance 1, 1990. 3. The property owner or successors and assigns shall comply with the Department of Environmental Regulation's consent order. 4. All trees designated for preservation that die during construction or because of construction practices, shall be replaced using the following schedule: For every inch of tree caliper lost, three inches of new tree caliper.shall be replaced of like specie. The replacement tree shall have a minimum three -inch caliper diameter. 5. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the Landscape Architect of record shall certify in writing to the City that the landscaping has been completed per the approved landscape plans. Any minor changes to the approved landscape plans shall be approved by City Council. Once the City has the certified letter from the Landscape Architect, the City Forester shall inspect the site for compliance. Once compliance has been confirmed by the City Forester, the City Building Department shall be notified. ® 6. Prior to construction, trees or vegetated clusters which have been designated for preservation as per the..landscape plan shall be properly tagged. The vegetation falling within the drip line of these treeszshall be preserved where desirable. Prior to land clearing, the developer shall-erect and maintain protective barriers around the drip line of all trees or vegetated clusters to be protected. This work shall be inspected and approved by the City Forester prior to issuance of any building permit requiring land clearing. section 153.50 (Tree Protection) paragraphs B, C and D shall also be enforced during construction. 7. All roof - mounted equipment shall be screened from line -of -sight view. S. The approval is for a Light Manufacturing use s only with trip generations based on the submitted traffic study. 9. In consideration of an unknown date of completion of Riverside Drive realignment, particularly as location of improvements relate to the East area of the Planned Unit Development site, petitioner shall, prior to obtaining a Building Permit for construction, post a bond or letter of credit guaranteeing the placement of such improvements within two (2) years from effective date.. The requisite amount of money therefor shall ® 2 res47.92 determined by the City Manager. No Building Permit shall be issued until the bond is ® posted. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of occupancy for Phase II or within three (3) years from the effective date hereof, whichever occurs first, the Petitioner shall comply with the landscape /streetscape program. C, Section 3. All development under this Planned Unit Development shall be completed within three (3) years from effective date hereof. The City Council may consider an extension of said time period for no more than one'(1) year, provided a Petition for Time Extension is filed prior to date of expiration and good cause is established by Petitioner. Action by the City Council on such a Petition may be taken without intervention of the Planning and Zoning Commission or published notice of hearing. Approval or denial shall be by Resolution. Section 4. All Resolutions or parts of Resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 5. This Resolution shall be effective upon date of adoption. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS /.f DAY OF,JUNE, 1992. MAYOR MICHAEL MARTINO ATTEST: .e LINDA V. KOSIER, CITY CLERK VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT MAYOR MARTINO VICE MAYOR RUSSO COUNCILMAN ALDRED COUNCILWOMAN MONROE COUNCILMAN KISELEWSKI ® 3 res47.92 ® i 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ®24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Date Prepared: December 21, 2004 RESOLUTION 11, 2005 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA APPROVING A SITE PLAN AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOR A 17,270 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING LOCATED ON LOT 2 OF THE 7.0 -ACRE SITE WHICH COMPRISES LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE . NORTHCORP PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (PCD), GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND NORTHCORP PARKWAY, AS MORE PARTICULARY DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR WAIVERS; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. - WHEREAS, on June 18, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution 47, 1992 allowing 33,485 square feet to be used for the manufacture of medical equipment on a 7 -acre site to be completed in one phase of development within the NorthCorp PCD; and WHEREAS, on November 18, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution 107, 1992 amending the site plan for the Anspach Effort; and WHEREAS, on September 23, 1997, City staff granted an Administrative Approval for a 17,032 square -foot Phase II expansion to the building, as .well as changes to the landscape plan, amending the site plan for the Anspach Effort; and WHEREAS, on November 23, 1999, the Site Plan and Appearance Review, Committee granted approval for the addition of 37 parking spaces on the site, amending the site plan for the Anspach Effort; and 31 WHEREAS, on June 5, 2003, the City Council granted approval'for the addition 32 of 37 parking spaces on Lots 1 and 2 of the NorthCorp PCD, .amending the site plan for 33 the Anspach Effort with the adoption of Resolution 98, 2003; and 34 35 WHEREAS, the City has received an application from Don Hearing of Cotluer 36 and Hearing, on behalf of Anspach Holdings, Ltd., for approval of a 17,270 square -foot 37 building located on Lot 1 of the 7.0 -acre site which comprises Lots 1 and 2 of the 38 NorthCorp PCD, generally located at the southwest corner < of the intersection of 39 Riverside Drive and as more particularly described herein; and 40 41 WHEREAS, the subject parcel is currently zoned Planned Community District 42 (PCD) Overlay with an underlying zoning of Research and Light Industrial Park (M1) 43 and a future land use designation of Industrial (1); and 44 45 WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application, 46 has determined that it is sufficient, and has recommended approval; and Date Prepared: December 20, 2004 Resolution 11, 2005 • 1 WHEREAS, on December 14, 2004, the Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board 2 recommended approval of the amendment to the previously - approved site plan with a 3 vote of 7 -0; and 4 5 WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed approval of this Resolution to be in the 6 best interest of the citizens and residents of the City of Palm Beach Gardens. 7 8 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 9 OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA that: 10 11 SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and ratified. 12 13 SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida hereby 14 approves a 17,270 - square -foot building, located on Lot 2 of the 7.0 -acre -site which 15 comprises Lots 1 and 2 of the NorthCorp Planned Community Development (PCD), as 16 more particularly described below: 17 18 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 19 20 LOT 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SOUTHPARK CENTER, AS RECORDED IN 21 PLAT BOOK 67, PAGES 87 AND 88; PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH,COUNTY, 22 FLORIDA. 23 •24 TOGETHER WITH: 25 26 LOT 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF WEST PARK CENTER, AS RECORDED-IN 27 PLAT BOOK 67, PAGES 91 AND 92, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, 28 FLORIDA. 29 30 SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida hereby 31 approves the following waivers with this approval: 32 33 1. Section 78 -345 (d)(3) - Increase in Parking Spaces, to allow -an additional 34 51.8% (58 spaces) over the minimum required parking spaces: The Land 35 Development Regulations allow a maximum 10% over the minimum 36 required parking spaces. 37 38 2. Section 78 -344 (1) — Parking Stall and Bay Dimensions, to allow 9.5'X 18.5' 39 parking stalls. The Land Development Regulations require a minimum 10' 40 X 18.5' parking stall. 41 42 3. Section 78- 344(h)- — Off- street Parking & Loading Entrances and Exits, to 43 allow for a 30 -foot stacking distance at the south entrance. The Land 44 Development Regulations require a minimum 100 -foot stacking distance. 45 • 2 lei 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 • 24 25. 26. 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 LJ Date Prepared: December 20, 2004 Resolution 11, 2005 4. Section 78- 319(2) - Minimum Landscape Buffer, to allow for an overlapping of easements by more than five (5) feet for required landscape buffers for the east andwest landscape buffers. 5. Section 78 -285, Permitted Signs, Table 24, to allow for the Anspach -logo on the west elevation of the building, not to exceed 24 inches, in height. SECTION 4. Said approval shall comply with the following additional conditions, which shall be binding upon the applicant, its successors, assigns, and /or grantees: City Engineer 1. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, ' the applicant shall provide - written permission from the easement - holder(s) to allow landscaping within the easements in accordance with LDR Section 78 =306. (City Engineer) 2. Prior to construction plan . approval . and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the applicant shall provide an adequate ,pavement marking and signage plan acceptable to the City Engineer. - .(City Engineer) 3. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the applicant shall provide a cross - section detail for the dry retention pond. (City Engineer) 4. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the applicant shall provide cross - section details at the property boundaries, including the roads, conservation easements, and retention pond for consistency with the plan, view and to match existing conditions. (City Engineer) 5. The applicant shall provide the City with copies of all permit applications, certifications, and approvals. (City Engineer) 6. The applicant shall provide all necessary construction -zone signage and fencing as required bythe City Engineer.. (City Engineer) 7. The applicant shall comply with any and all Palm Beach County Traffic Division conditions as outlined in 'PBC Traffic Division equivalency and. concurrency approval letters. (City Engineer) 8. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the applicant shall provide surety for public infrastructure and all landscaping and irrigation costs. The required surety shall be based on a cost estimate for the project, including public infrastructure and all landscaping and irrigation costs, which cost estimate shall be reviewed and 3 44 45 46 • 4 Date Prepared: December 20, 2004 Resolution 11, 2005 • 1 approved by the City. The cost estimate shall be signed and sealed by an 2 engineer and landscape architect registered in the State of Florida. Surety 3 will be based on 110% of the total combined approved cost estimates and 4 shall be posted with the City prior to the issuance of the first land alteration 5 permit. (City Engineer, Building Department) 6 7 9. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first building 8 permit, the applicant shall provide a cost estimate for the on -site project 9 improvements, not including public infrastructure, landscaping, and, 10 irrigation costs, for review and approval by the City. The cost estimate shall 11 be signed and sealed by an engineer registered in the State of Florida and 12 shall be posted with the City prior to the issuance of the first building permit. 13 (City Engineer) 14 15 10. The applicant shall comply with all Federal EPA and State of Florida 16 Department of Environmental Protection NPDES permit requirements, 17 including, but not limited to, preparation of a stormwater pollution prevention 18 plan and identification of appropriate Best Management Practices, as 19 generally accepted by the Environmental Planning Agency (EPA) and /or 20 local regulatory agencies, for construction activities, submission of a Notice 21 of Intent to EPA or its designee, implementation of the approved plans, 22 inspection and maintenance of controls during construction, and submission 23 of a Notice of Termination. (City Engineer) • 24 25 11. Prior to issuance of the first land alteration permit,.the applicant shall submit 26 signed, sealed, and dated construction plans (paving, grading, drainage, 27 and water and sewer) and all pertinent calculations to the City Engineer for 28 review and comment. (City Engineer) 29 30 12. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land 31 alteration permit, the applicant shall schedule a pre - permit meeting with City 32 staff. (City Engineer) 33 34 City Forester 35 36 13. The applicant shall install the Riverside Drive landscaping prior to the 37 issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the building within Lot 38 1 of South Park. (City Forester) 39 40 14. The City shall receive documentation from the applicant that the existing 41 conservation easements on Lot 1 of South Park are abandoned prior to the 42 issuance of the first clearing permit or land alteration permit for said lot. 43 (City Forester) 44 45 46 • 4 Date Prepared: December 20, 2004 Resolution 11, 2005 • 1 15. The conservation easements for the two areas on the site plan labeled 2 "Proposed Relocated Conservation Easement No. 1 and No. 2" shall be 3 publicly recorded prior to the issuance of the first clearing permit or land 4 alteration permit. (City Forester) 5 6 16. All the trees within the new conservation easements No. 1 and No. 2 shall 7 be protected during construction by barricades acceptable to the City 8 Forester and the minimum standards described within Section 330 of the 9 Land Development Regulations. (City Forester) 10 11 Police Department 12 13 17. Lighting locations shall not conflict with landscaping, including long -term 14 tree canopy growth. (Police Department) 15 16 18. Metal halide lighting shall be used for all street and pedestrian walkways. 17 (Police Department) 18 19 19. Numerical addresses shall be illuminated for nighttime visibility and shall 20 have bi- directional visibility from the roadways. (Police Department) 21 22 Miscellaneous • 46 November 19, 2004 (1 sheet total) kr 1023 24 20. Required digital files of the approved plat in its entirety transformed to NAD 25 83 State Plan Coordinate System shall be submitted to the Planning and 26 Zoning Division prior to issuance of the first building permit. Approved civil 27 engineering as -built design and architectural drawings shall be submitted to 28 the Planning and Zoning Division prior to issuance of the first Certificate of 29 Occupancy. (GIS Manager, Development Compliance) 30 31 SECTION 5. This approval shall be in compliance with the following plans on file 32 with the City's Growth Management Department: 33 34 1. Site plan and landscape plans, sheets 1 through 5, prepared by Cotleur 35 Hearing, last revised on December 1, 2004, and received and stamped by 36 the City on December 23, 2004. 37 38 2. Elevations, sheet 4.1, prepared by Alan Strassler, dated December 16, 39 2004, and received and stamped by the City on December 16, 2004. 40 41 3. Elevations, sheet 3.1 and 7.1, prepared by Alan Strassler, dated November 42 16, 2004, and received and stamped by the City on November 19, 2004. 43 44 4. Site Lighting Plan, sheet SL -1, prepared by Romcke Coburn Engineering, 45 dated November 18, 2004, and received and stamped by the City on • 46 November 19, 2004 (1 sheet total) kr Date Prepared: December 20, 2004 Resolution 11, 2005 • 1 SECTION 7. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 2 3 4 PASSED AND ADOPTED this p�g""- day of _ , 2005. 5 6 7 CITY OF PALM B ARDENS, FLORIDA 8 9 l 10 BY: 11 _ l ,Mayor 12 ATTEST: 13 14 15 BY: 16 Patricia Snider, City CI 17 18 19 20 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND .21 LEGAL SUFFICIENCY 22 l . 23 •24 BY: J 25 nstine P. Tatum, City Attorney 26 27 28 29 30 VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT 31 32 MAYOR JABLIN ✓ 33 34 VICE MAYOR RUSSO `� { 35 36 COUNCILMEMBER DELGADO 37 38 COUNCILMEMBER LEVY 39 40 COUNCILMEMBER VALECHE 41 42 43 44 45 46 •47 \ \Pbgsfile\Attorney \attorney share \RESOLUTIONS \anspach - reso 11 2005.doc 6 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS • PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD Agenda Cover Memorandum • Date Prepared: January 13, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 Subject /Agenda Item: Petition SPLN- 05 -11- 000003: Anspach Site Plan Amendment Public Hearing/Recommendation to City Council: A request by Cotleur & Hearing, Inc., agent for Anspach Holdings, Ltd., for an amendment to the previously approved site plan to allow approval of a 48,941 square -foot building, located on Lot 1 of the 7.0 -acre site, which comprises Lot 1 of the south park center plat and lot 2 of the west park center plat in the NorthCorp Planned Community Development (PCD). The subject site is generally located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Riverside Drive and NorthCorp Parkway. [ X ] Recommendation to APPROVE with two waivers and conditions [ X 1 Recommendation to DENY one waiver Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: FINANCE: PZAB Action: Growth Management: [ ] Approved Planning Manager 13 Costs: $ N/A [ ] App. w/ conditions Talal M. Benothman Project Manager Total [ ] Denied City Attorney Joyce C. Cai [ ] Rec. approval Christine Tatum Planner $ N/A [ ] Rea. app. w/ conds. Finance Administrator Current FY [ ] Rec. Denial [X] Quasi — Judicial Allan Owens [ ] Legislative [ ] Continued to: [ ] Public Hearing Funding Source: Development Compliance Attachments: Bahareh Keshavarz - Wolfs, Advertised: [ ]Operating • Ordinance 1, 1990 Date: 01/13/06 [X] Other NA • Resolution 47, 1992 Paper: Palm Beach Post • Resolution 11, 2005 Growth Manage Tx ent • Proposed Plans Adrninistrato [ ] Required • Table 2 Charles K. ;11� [X] Not Required Budget Acct. #: N/A Approved By: City Manager Affected Parties: [ ] Notified Ronald M. Ferris [ X] Not Required Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 • TARGETED EXPEDITED PERMITTING PROGRAM As determined by the City Council, a new Section 78 -57 of Code of Ordinances was created entitled "Targeted Expedited Permitted Program" in accordance with the Policy 13.1.1.6 of the Comprehensive Plan. Policy 13.1.1.6 states, in part, that "The City shall maintain and develop programs to encourage and facilitate the expansion and relocation of target industries in the City including but not limited to: Implement a targeted expedited permitting program for companies that are expanding operations or moving into the city so that value -added employment may be created at a faster pace..." Outlining.the Targeted Expedited Permitting Program, Ordinance 1, 2006 was created to provide a legal basis to prioritize economic development projects in the land development review process without compromising the integrity of the City's Comprehensive Plan or Land Development Regulations. This petition with a companion petition PCDA- 05 -11- 000001 (NorthCorp PCD amendment) has qualified for the Targeted Expedited Permitting Program for economic development, and has been accelerated in the reviewing process pursuant to Ordinance 1, 2006. ECOMOMIC IMPACT ON AD- VALOREM TAXES Based on a conservative estimate of $400 per a square foot construction cost for a • Research/Development building and based on current ad- valorem tax rate of 5.928 mills, the Anspach expansion would generate approximately $116,049.00 additional revenue annually. This is subject to change, depending upon actual construction cost. A full RIMS II analysis will be performed (calculating impact of job creation, insularly support jobs, purchase of machinery, etc.) once final numbers are established. e • BACKGROUND The subject site consists of lot 1 of South Park Center (lot 1) and lot 2 of West Park Center (lot 2) and is bounded by Interstate 95 to the'west, Northcorp Parkway to the north, lot 2 of South Park Center to the south and Riverside Drive to the east. Lot 1 and lot 2 are located within the NorthCorp `Planned Community Development (PCD), which was originally approved on January 18, 1990, with the adoption of Ordinance 1,' 1990. Ordinance 1, 1990 united all lands comprising the plats of NorthCorp Center, RCA Blvd.. Center, West Park Center and South Park Center (the entire lands comprising the former RCA site) into one development order. The original ordinance provided for an approval mechanism for future petitions within the PCD, assigned site- specific restrictions to certain lots, established maximum trip generations for the development, and established time - certain conditions of approval for certain road and drainage improvements. 2 Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 is The original site plan for the subject site was approved by the City Council through the adoption of Resolution 47, 1992, which permitted an increase of 7,500 square feet to the existing building consisting of 25,985 square feet. Subsequently, Resolution 107, 1992 approved a wall mounted building sign, and on September 23, 1997, an administrative approval granted a 17,032 square - foot Phase II expansion to the building as well as changes to the landscape plan. The most recent approval was on January 20, 2005, when the City Council adopted Resolution 11, 2005 to allow for a new building with 17,270 square feet of light industrial use to be built on lot 1 of the South Park Center, which is the south portion of the site. • • LAND -USE AND ZONING The future land -use designation of the subject site as reflected on the City's Future Land Use Map is Industrial (I). The zoning classification of the site is Planned Community District (PCD) Overlay with an underlying zoning of Research and Light Industrial Park (M1). The subject site is located at the intersection of Riverside Drive and NorthCorp .Parkway within the NorthCorp Planned Community Development. For a complete listing of adjacent uses, land use designations and zoning districts, please refer to Table 1. Table 1: Anspach Building on north Subject Property portion (lot 2) Vacant on south portion (lot 1) PCD/ Ml- Research and Light Industrial I I - Industrial Water Management Tract PCD/ North (W -1) M1- Research and Light Industrial I - Industrial NorthCorp Center across NorthCorp Parkway Design Center on Lot 2 of S. PCD/ South Park Center M1- Research and Light Industrial I - Industrial (Decorators/Keebler) Light Industrial Building on East Lot 6 & 7 across Riverside Dr. (Implant Innovations) PCD/ M1- Research and Light Industrial I — Industrial • Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 PROJECT DETAILS The subject site consists of 7.0 -acres and is located on lot 1 of South Park Center and lot 2 of West Park Center, within the NorthCorp PCD. Lot 2 contains an existing 49,155 square -foot building, which is being used for production services, research and professional offices associated with the Anspach Company. With this petition, the applicant is seeking an approval for the construction of a new building with 48,941 square feet on lot 1, the southern portion of the site. The proposed building will replace the 17,270- square -foot un -built building approved on January 20, 2005, through the adoption of Resolution 11, 2005. In this application, the proposed building will provide 32,666 square feet of light industrial use and 16,275 square feet of office use to accommodate the growth and operation expansion of the Anspach Company specializing in the production of high -speed instrumentation for Neurosurgery, Neurotology, Otology and Orthopedics. The additional 48,941 square -foot building will be allocated from an entitlement of the remaining 96,441 square feet of the overall PCD, which has been requested through a PCD amendment filed concurrently with this petition. Access The site will continue to have the existing ingress and egress access onto Riverside Drive and NorthCorp Parkway. An additional access point with exit only was proposed by the applicant with this petition, which is located near the southeast corner of the site for vehicle delivery purpose. The additional 12 -foot wide access will be 135' south of the main entrance to the subject site. The proposed curb cut will require an interruption of an otherwise continuous landscape buffer along Riverside Drive. In staff's professional opinion, due to its close proximity to the existing entrance and interruption of the continuous RJW landscape buffer, the proposed additional access point is not warranted. Staff suggests that the applicant utilize or expand the existing ingress and egress access to meet the needs of the new building. Landscaping The minimum open space is 28% as required by condition 4 of the Ordinance 1, 1990. The applicant has provided 42.71%. The applicant is required to provide a total of 12,373.2 points of landscaping for the site; the applicant has provided 14,209 landscape points (9,118 existing 4 West Gardens Park across I -95 P/I - Public or Institutional ROS - Recreation Open Space PROJECT DETAILS The subject site consists of 7.0 -acres and is located on lot 1 of South Park Center and lot 2 of West Park Center, within the NorthCorp PCD. Lot 2 contains an existing 49,155 square -foot building, which is being used for production services, research and professional offices associated with the Anspach Company. With this petition, the applicant is seeking an approval for the construction of a new building with 48,941 square feet on lot 1, the southern portion of the site. The proposed building will replace the 17,270- square -foot un -built building approved on January 20, 2005, through the adoption of Resolution 11, 2005. In this application, the proposed building will provide 32,666 square feet of light industrial use and 16,275 square feet of office use to accommodate the growth and operation expansion of the Anspach Company specializing in the production of high -speed instrumentation for Neurosurgery, Neurotology, Otology and Orthopedics. The additional 48,941 square -foot building will be allocated from an entitlement of the remaining 96,441 square feet of the overall PCD, which has been requested through a PCD amendment filed concurrently with this petition. Access The site will continue to have the existing ingress and egress access onto Riverside Drive and NorthCorp Parkway. An additional access point with exit only was proposed by the applicant with this petition, which is located near the southeast corner of the site for vehicle delivery purpose. The additional 12 -foot wide access will be 135' south of the main entrance to the subject site. The proposed curb cut will require an interruption of an otherwise continuous landscape buffer along Riverside Drive. In staff's professional opinion, due to its close proximity to the existing entrance and interruption of the continuous RJW landscape buffer, the proposed additional access point is not warranted. Staff suggests that the applicant utilize or expand the existing ingress and egress access to meet the needs of the new building. Landscaping The minimum open space is 28% as required by condition 4 of the Ordinance 1, 1990. The applicant has provided 42.71%. The applicant is required to provide a total of 12,373.2 points of landscaping for the site; the applicant has provided 14,209 landscape points (9,118 existing 4 Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 • points and 5,091 proposed points). The undeveloped portion of the site is currently vegetated with pine trees. The applicant is required to replace with equal amount of vegetation around the property. The proposed building will also require a relocation of existing conservation easements. One 7,649 square feet/0.17 acres conservation easement has been proposed to be located along the south property line. The City Forester has reviewed the proposed relocation of the conservation easements and found that several issues have not been satisfied at this time. However, the applicant is working to address these issues prior to City Council review. The most significant issue is that the applicant's proposal to replant plant material is NOT an acceptable tree mitigation to ensure no net loss of plant material. Staff has being working diligently with the applicant and will continue to work with the applicant to resolve all the outstanding landscaping issues. The proposed development plan provides a 20- foot -wide landscape buffer along Riverside Drive that includes a 12 -foot wide drainage easement, which is proposed to be abandoned by the applicant. The landscape buffer along the western property line is required to be 15 feet in width based upon PCD Streetscape /Buffer Landscape Plan approved on Sept. 17, 1992 through the adoption of Resolution 65, 1992. The proposed development plan provides for a buffer in excess of 15 feet with existing and new trees proposed by the applicant. Along the south property line, an 8- foot -wide buffer is proposed and is consistent with code requirements. Site Lighting • Prior to City Council review the applicant will submit a signed and sealed photometric plan to the City Engineer for review and approval. Parking The applicant is proposing to provide a total of 197 parking spaces on the site. The minimum number of spaces required by Code is 190 spaces, based on a ratio of one space per 1,000 square feet of light industrial use (Laboratory, Industrial Research and Development) and one space per 250 square feet of office. The total number of handicapped parking spaces required is six (6); the applicant has provided six (6). The number of the provided parking spaces for the entire site is 197, which is 3.68% more but 10% less than the minimum code requirement; therefore, a waiver is not required pertaining to the number of parking spaces exceeding the minimum requirement. Since the applicant has provided 2.99 acres /42.71 % of open space, which is 1.03 acres /14.71 % more than the required, no additional open space is needed for the increase in a number of parking spaces. ' The petitioner has requested a waiver as it relates to a parking width dimension. The requested waiver is to allow for 9.5- foot -wide parking spaces instead of 10- foot -wide parking spaces as specified by Section 78- 344(1) of the LDRs. According to Section 78- 344(1)(2) of the LDRs additional pervious open space at a ratio of 1.5 sq. ft. is required to be provided for, every square foot of reduced paved parking area. This would require 1,512.38 square feet of additional open • space to be located within the same parking facility. The petitioner has provided 1,359.75 5 Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 • square -foot additional open space. However, a shortage of 152.63 square feet of open space is required to be provided to meet the criteria as outlined in the code. Staff will continue to work with the applicant to ensure its compliance with the code requirement regarding the additional open space for the reduction in parking space dimension. Traffic Concurrence The proposed expansion is consistent with the County's Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance and the City's Traffic Concurrency. The County's Traffic Division and the City's Engineer have raised no issues with respect to traffic. The project is located within the NorthCorp Planned Community Development, which has 962 PM peak hour trips vested for the South Park Center, North Park Center and RCA Blvd. Center. The applicant's traffic impact statement indicates that the proposed 48,941 square -foot addition on the subject lots 1 will generate 57 new PM peak hour trips. 73 trips will remain available for future developments in the NorthCorp PCD. Said traffic statement was reviewed and approved by the Palm Beach County Traffic Division and City's traffic engineer. Architecture The proposed building will have three stories with flat roof and 52 -11' in height to the highest point of the parapets and 60 -11" to the top of the entrance features framing the center of the is building on both the east and west fagades. On the east fagade, a covered canopy is also proposed extending 20' -6" feet from the main entrance emphasizing the central entry to the building. Along the front/east fagade of the proposed building, a covered walkway, intended for weather protection, was also proposed above a seven -(7) -foot wide sidewalk running from the south end of the proposed building to the south fagade of the existing building. The proposed building is generally consistent with the existing building with respect to architectural style, building materials, and color. & nage The applicant is proposing to provide a principal tenant sign with 36" letter height on the third floor of the west elevation facing I -95, as well as a tenant sign with 24" letter height on the third floor of the east elevation facing Riverside Drive. According to Section 78 -285 entitled "Permitted Signs ", the applicant is allowed one wall sign. The applicant has requested two (2) waivers to: a) allow for one (1) additional tenant sign with 24" letter height on the east elevation facing Riverside Drive; b) allow for the installation of the two wall signs to be above the second floor line. The applicant has also proposed a new monument sign to be located at the main entrance along Riverside Drive. The style of the proposed sign will be the same as the existing monument sign located at the site entrance along NorthCorp Parkway. The proposed monument sign is permitted because the site meets the frontage criteria as required for a second ground sign pursuant to Section 78 -285 of the LDRs. 6 • • • Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 Art in Public Places The applicant has indicated that the construction cost of the proposed building will exceed one - million dollars and therefore the Art in Public Places requirement is applicable to the proposed development. The applicant has elected to pay cash in lieu of providing art as permitted by Section 78 -261 of LDRs. Waivers WAIVERS REQUESTED Code Required/ Provided Requested Recommendation Section Allowed Waiver Section 78- 344(1): Parking 10'X 18.5' 9.5' X 18.5' 0.5' foot in width Support (1) Stall width Section 78- 344(h): off- 100' minimum 30' stacking 70' deviation at the Support (2) street parking & stacking distance distance at the main main entrance loading entrance along along Riverside Dr. entrances and Riverside Dr. exits Section 78 -285, Only one (1) Waiver to allow for Table 24: tenant wall sign Two tenant wall one (1) additional Denial (3) Permitted signs allowed signs tenant wall sign Section 78 -285 Tenant wall sign Tenant wall signs Tenant wall signs to Table 24: not higher than the to be on third floor be on third floor of Support (4) Permitted Signs second floor line of building building 1) Staff recommends approval as a majority of the existing parking on -site is 9' X 18', as approved by the original submittal. Additionally, the applicant has provided 1,359.75 square feet of additional open'space (1,512.38 square feet required by code). The applicant is working with staff to provide the needed 194.25 square feet of additional open space to meet the code requirement for the requested parking width reduction. 2) Staff recommends approval as the ingress /egress already exists on site. Same waiver was approved in the previous petition for a 17,270 square -foot new building through the adoption of Resolution 11, 2005, 3) Staff recommends denial as the existing building on site already provides signage along I- 4) 95. Since there is no signage along the east elevation of the existing building facing Riverside Drive. Staff recommends the principal tenant sign with- 36" letter `height as permitted by the code to be installed on the east elevation of the proposed building. Staff recommends approval considering that a) the proposed building setbacks 230 feet from the east property line abutting Riverside Drive; b) the proposed sign on a third floor will not impose an adverse visual impact but rather will provide an adequate name recognition for visitors entering the subject site. Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 • RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 with the following conditions and three waivers. City Engineer 1. The applicant shall provide, the City with copies of all permit applications, permits, certifications and approvals. (City Engineer) 2. Prior to construction plan approval. and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, applicant shall provide a cost estimate for the project, including public infrastructure and all landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the City in order to establish surety. The cost estimate shall-be signed and sealed by an engineer and landscape architect registered in the state of Florida. Surety will be based on 110% of the total combined approved cost estimates and shall be posted, with the City, prior to the issuance of the first building permit. In accordance with Section 78 -309 & 78 -461 of the LDR. (City Engineer) 3. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the applicant shall provide a cost estimate for the on -site project improvements, not including public infrastructure, or landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the City. • The cost estimate shall be signed and sealed by an engineer registered in the state of Florida and shall be posted with the City prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit. (City Engineer) • 4. The construction, operation and /or maintenance of any elements of the subject project shall not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage of surrounding areas. If, at any time during the project development, it is determined by the City that any of the surrounding areas are experiencing negative drainage impacts caused by the project, it shall be the applicant's responsibility to cure said impacts in a period of time. and a manner acceptable to the City prior to additional construction activities. (City Engineer) 5. The applicant shall comply with all Federal EPA and State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection NPDES permit requirements, including but not limited to, preparation of a storrnwater pollution prevention plan and identification of appropriate Best Management Practices, as generally accepted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and /or local regulatory agencies, for construction activities, submission of a Notice of Intent to EPA or their designee, implementation of the approved plans, inspection and maintenance of controls during construction, and submission of a Notice of Termination. (City Engineer) 6. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, applicant shall schedule a pre - permit meeting with City staff. (City Engineer) 8 Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: 'January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 • 7. Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the applicant shall provide to the City with letters of authorization from the applicable utility companies allowing landscaping and light poles to be places within the utility easements. (City Engineer) City Forester 8. Prior to scheduling this petition for City Council review, the site plan and landscape plan shall be revised to provide for the protection of three large Oak trees located in the southeast corner of the site as required per condition 24 (b) of Ordinance 1, 1990. (City Forester) 9. Prior to scheduling this petition for City Council review, the site plan and landscape plan shall be revised to provide for the protection of a minimum 199 caliper inches of Pine trees.. (City Forester) 10. Prior to scheduling this petition for City Council review, the site plan and landscape plan shall be revised to provide a protection of a minimum of sixteen Oak trees by relocating them from the existing parking lot area to the western buffer to immediately screen the I -95 wall from the proposed building. (City Forester) 11. Prior to scheduling for City Council review, landscape plan shall be revised to provide a protection of five pine trees that are located within the drainage easement near the southwest corner, and plant a minimum of five Cypress trees of varying sizes along the embankment of the proposed detention area. (City Forester) 12. If any tree protection is altered by any future approvals for drainage, or utility construction work, the City shall require tree relocation or mitigation of three new' caliper inches for everyone lost. (City Forester) 13. Prior to the scheduling of City Council review, the applicant shall revise the point calculations for the proposed landscape material to the satisfaction of the City Forester. (City Forester) 14: Prior to the scheduling of City Council review, the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to include one additional cluster of three palms along the north and south fagades of the proposed building. (City Forester) 15. Prior to the scheduling of City Council review, the applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to include 1,493 square feet of additional open space as required for an increase in a number of parking spaces pursuant to Section 78- 345(d) of the LDRs. This can be accomplished by installing additional tree diamonds within the parking area and adding pedestrian amenities. (City Forester) 16. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the property owner shall replace all landscaping removed due to death, disease, damage, insect - infestation, or hurricane as shown on the approved landscape plan for the north parcel. (City Forester) • Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 0 17. Prior to the issuance of the land alteration permit, the applicant shall erect and maintain protective barriers around the drip line of existing trees adjacent to the proposed improvements. All work shall. be inspected and approved by the Landscape Architect of Record and the City Forester. (City Forester) 18. Prior to the scheduling of City Council review, the applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape .plan to show the location for a possible future generator along with required landscape material to screen the generator from view. (City Forester) 19. Prior to the scheduling of City Council review, the applicant shall revise the site data table to reflect the total amount of open space provided on the site, which is 2.99 acres or 42.71 %. (City Forester) Police Department 20. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall prepare a construction site security and management plan for approval by the City's Police Department CPTED Official. (Police Department) a) The developer /project manager after site clearing and placement of construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be limited to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle barriers, construction/visitor pass, reduce /minimize entry /exit points, encourage sub contractors to secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other measure deemed appropriate to provide a safe and secure working environment. b) The security management plan shall be maintained throughout the construction phase of the project. Non - compliance with the approved plan shall result in a stop -work order for the entire planned unit development. 21. Metal halide lighting shall be used for alongside /undei /adjacent to proposed walkway cover (Police Department) Miscellaneous 22. The Property owner shall be required to notify the City's Public Works Division via fax at least 10 working days prior to the commencement of any work/construction activity within any public right -of -way within the City of Palm Beach Gardens. In the case of a city right - of -way, the property owner has at least five working days to obtain a right -of -way permit. Right -of -way permits may be obtained at the Building Division. Failure to comply with this condition could result in a Stop Work Order.of all work/construction activity within the public right -of -way and the subject development site. (Public Works) 23. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the City shall receive documentation from the applicant that two existing drainage easements located in the middle of the 7.0 -acre site and • along the Riverside Dr. are abandoned. (City Engineer & City Forester) 10 Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 • 24. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall re -plat the site. (City Engineer). 25. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant is required to comply with the Art- in-Public-Places requirement by depositing an amount of money equal to the art fee into an escrow account or make a payment in lieu thereof. The Art-in- Public- Places Advisory Board shall review and make a recommendation to the City Council on any proposed art on site. (Planning & Zoning) 26. Required digital files of approved plat in its entirety transformed to NAD 83 State Plan Coordinate System shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Division prior to issuance of the first building permit. Approved civil engineering as -built design and architectural drawings shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Division prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. (GIS Manager, Development Compliance) Waivers: Staff recommends approval of the following requested waivers: 1. The waiver request from Section 78- 344(Ll), entitled "Parking stall and bay dimensions, to allow for 9.5- foot -wide parking spaces. 2. The waiver request from Section 78 -344, entitled "Stacking Distance ", to allow • for a reduction in the required 100 -foot stacking distance, to allow for a 30 -foot stacking distance. 3. The waiver from Section 78 -285, Table 24, entitled "Permanent Signs ", to allow for a tenant wall sign to be installed on third floor of the proposed building along the east elevation facing Riverside Drive. Staff recommends denial of the following requested waiver: 1. The waiver from Section 78 -285, Table 24, entitled "Permanent Signs ", to allow for an additional tenant wall sign on the west elevation of the proposed building facing I -95. • Date Prepared: January 13, 2005 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: SPLN- 05 -11- 000003 • Table 2: Consistency with Ordinance 1, 1990 and LDRs • * Note: Where there is a difference, the Ordinance 1, 1990 takes the precedence. 12 Proposed Plan Ordinance 1, 1990 Code Consistency Requirement Use Light Industrial Industrial, Office, PCD and subject and Office other M -1 uses and to Ordinance 1, YES uses under item 21 1990 of condition of approval 24.5% Max. 38% n/a YES Max. Floor Area Ratio (including the - overall PCD proposed bldg. Sq. Ft. on lot 1) Max. Lot Coverage 21.5% 37.5% 40% * YES Min. Front setback 195'— Proposed 34.3' 25' * YES Bldg. Min. Rear Setback 81.4' — Proposed n/a 20' YES Bldg. Min. Side Setback 110.7' -Proposed n/a 15' YES Bldg. Max. Bldg. Height/ 52' -11"/ 3 stories 12 stories - lot 1 of 50' * YES Stories south park. center Min. Open Space 42.71% 28 % 15% * YES * Note: Where there is a difference, the Ordinance 1, 1990 takes the precedence. 12 \W `/ January 18, 1990 is ORDINANCE 1, 1990 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE CURRENT ZONING FROM M -1, RESEARCH AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO PCD AND PUD ZONING WITH UNDERLYING ZONING OF M -1, ON ALL LANDS COMPRISING THE PLATS OF NORTHCORP CENTER, RCA BOULEVARD CENTER, WEST PARK CENTER AND SOUTH PARK CENTER (THE ENTIRE LANDS COMPRISING THE FORMER RCA SITE);-AND, PROVIDING THAT SUBSEQUENT APPROVALS SHALL BE BY RESOLUTION WITHOUT NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION OF NOTICE BEING REQUIRED; AND, PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH;-AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: Section 1. The Zoning upon the lands known as "The Former RCA Site" located within the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof is hereby amended from M -1, Research and Light Industrial Park District, to PCD. The underlying zoning shall be and the same is hereby designated as that set forth in the M -1, Research and Light • Industrial Park District, City of Palm Beach Gardens Zoning Code. Section 2. Attached hereto as Composite Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof are plats prepared by Hutcheon Engineers as follows: Plat of NorthCorp Center, Plat of RCA Boulevard Center; Plat of West Park Center and Plat of South Park Center. The PCD consisting of the aforesaid described plats (Former RCA Site) heretofore approved by the City, shall be developed in accordance with the said plats, the Development Orders and Conditions of approval entered and approved by the City on January 18, 1990. Further, each lot within the foregoing plats is hereby designated as a Planned Unit Development and the individuals Planned Unit Developments are hereby created. Section 3. Impact fees shall be paid by the developers of the individual Planned Unit Developments as set forth in any appli- cable ordinance, law rule or regulation of any governmental body with jurisdiction over the property development. • Section 4. Development of the individual Planned Unit • Devlopments within the Planned Community District shall proceed in accordance with the said Development Orders and Conditions of Approval of January 18, 1990 attached to the Plat of West Park Center and the Plat of South Park Center; and the general conditions as hereinafter setforth: 1. Maximum floor area ratio (FAR) on the overall PCD project . shall not exceed 38 %. 2. Minimum front yard setback for all buildings shall be: A. 25' for a one (1) or two (2) story, or 25' high struc- ture. B. An additional one (1) foot setback for each three (3) additional feet of building height above 25'. 3. Height restrictions: Lots 4 & 13 (South Park Center) 6 stories Lots 1 & 2 (RCA Blvd. Center) 8 stories Northcorp Center Site & Lots 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 (South Park Center) 10 stories Lot 1 (West Park Center) & Lots 1, 2, 3 (South Park Center 12 stories Lot 12 (South Park Center) no development • permitted unless site is compatable to use of parcels 8,9, and 10, as approved by the City Council. 4. Minimum Open Space* requirements: , Stories Open Space 1 - 4 28.0% 5 28.5% 6 29.0% 7 29.5% 8 30.0% 9 31.25% 10 32.50% 11 33.75% 12 35.0% *Open Space is defined as living plant material, water, and landscaped plazas, as determined by the City Council. 5. A. Antennas and microwave dishes shall be subjected to specific PU0 review for screening. B. All roof- mounted equipment shall be totally screened. 6. The uses as outlined in Condition 21 shall be limited to 5% of the total approved square footage for the PCD and at any time during the development, no more than 10% shall be allowed. 7. No retail or commercial on the first 250' north of Burns Road. • - 2 - 8. A 30 -foot wide landscape buffer along Burns Road with a berm • average three feet in height and planting. 9. Lot coverage (structures) shall not exceed 40% of the site area for a two (2) story building and shall be decreased by 2.5% for each additional floor of height above two stories (Example: 10 stories; 50 - 8 (2.5) = 20 %). 10. A 71 pathway (east /west) along Burns Road, from I -95 to Alternate A -1 -A, shall be constructed or bonded by the property owner prior to final plat approval. 11. Traffic impact fees must be paid in accordance with the Palm Beach County Traffic Impact Ordinance. 12. City Council, in conjunction with the Developer(s), shall determine community facilities impact fees and the timing of payment for: A. Recreation B. Police C. Fire Property owner prior to the first building permit being issued within the PCD, shall pay $75,000 for community impact, which amount shall be credited against any future police and fire impact fees assessed against any development within the PCD. 13. The Property Owner or successors must comply with the DER consent order. 14. Building floors will be protected from the 100 year - 3 day, zero discharge storm event. Roadways will be protected from the 10 year - 1 day storm event. Parking lots will be pro - tected from the 3 year - 1 day storm event. • 15. Prior to the final surface water management calculations, applicant will provide the size and location of the culverts along Burns Road and I -95, and provide for any off -site drainage. • 16. The stormwater run -off from RCA Boulevard will need to be directed into the on -site stormwater management system in the final design. 17. The off -site drainage ditches that serve the project will need to be cleaned of debris, vegetation, and backfill prior to issuance of the first building permit, on any parcel except the Northcorp Center site. 18. The existing corrugated aluminum weir (riser) will need to be replaced prior to issuance of the first building permit, on any parcel except the Northcorp Center site. 19. The littoral planting shall be installed along the water retention area on the west side of the project if required by S.F.W.M.D. 20. The Property Owner will continue a uniform streetscape con- tinuity along all R.O.W. A streetscape /buffer plan for this PCD shall be presented to the City Council for approval by subsequent resolution prior to the issuance of approval of the first PUD. - 3 - 21. The following are uses allowed with the submission of each PUB, in addition to industrial and office and other M -1 uses: • (Please see Condition 6 for clarity) 1. Retail: Wearing Apparel Toys Sundries. Jewelry Camera /Photos Florist Gift Shop Delicatessen Bakery Office Equipment Food and .Drug Sales (each food or drug store shall be limited to a maximum of 5,000 sq. ft.) 2. Service Establishments: Barber /Beauty Shop Shoe Repair Laundry /Dry Cleaner Print Shop Travel AGency Employment Office Restaurant . Health Club 3. Hotel /Motel - One allowed in the project, limited to a a maximum of 120 guest rooms or suites or combination of, rooms and suites.. 4. Art Gallary, Museum, Dance, Art or Music Studio. • 5. Retail sale of beer and wine if in conjunction with restaurant or convenience store. 6. Day Care Center. 7.. Bar /Liquor Store, when approved by Resolution of the City Council. 8. Laundromat 9. Car Wash 10. Fraternal Organization . 11. Commercial Recreation including ancillary driving ranges. 27. Kahart Pinder's,conditions from his letter dated 1- 8- 90,'and recommendation 1- 18 -90, as follows: I. Plats of West-Park Center and Plats of South Park Center 1. The maximum trip generation for new construction approved in the Plat of West Park Center together with the development approved in the Plat of RCA Boulevard Center and in the Plat of South Park Center; shall not exceed six thousand sixty -three (6,063) daily trips, or nine hundred sixty -two (962) PM peak hour trips ( "Maximum Daily Trips" and "Maximum PM Peak Hour Trips ", respectively). 2. Any applicant appearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council shall provide a calculation of the daily and peak hour trips associated with the proposed project. A calculation of the daily and PM peak hour trips shall be undertaken utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) "Trip Generation ", Fourth Edition. - 4 - II. Plat of West Park Center • Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building for any land use in Lot 1, Plat of West Park Center, the construction contract shall have been let for the following road improvement and open to the public prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy on said Lot 1: (a) Addition of one (1) eastbound, left -turn lane to provide dual left -turn lanes at the intersection of RCA Boulevard and Alternate A -1 -A. III. Plat of South Park Center Prior to the issuance of building permits and /or cer- tificates of occupancy for any building on certain lots within the Plat of South Park Center as more fully detailed below, certain road improvements shall be under contract and /or complete and open to the public as follows: (a) Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any land uses on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7, the Contract let for construction of West Park Drive as a two lane as well as single northbound, southbound, eastbound and westbound left -turn lanes at the intersection of Burns Road with Riverside Drive /West Park Drive. (b) Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any land uses on Lots 7, 8, or 9, the Contract let for construction of the extension of NorthCorp Parkway in a two lane section easterly to its proposed terminus at East Park Drive. These improvements shall be complete and open to the public prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy for land • uses on the foregoing Lots 7, 8, and 9. (c) Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any land uses on Lots 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, or 13, the Contract let for construction of East Park Drive in a two lane section including one additional westbound right -turn lane as well as single eastbound and southbound left- -turn lanes at the intersection of Burns Road and East Park Drive. These improvements shall be complete and open to the public prior to issuance of any certificates of occupancy for land uses on the foregoing Lots 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, or 13. (d) Prior to the issuance of any building permits or series of building permits for any land uses generating more than three thousand, five hundred sixty -nine (3,569) daily trips or five hundred sixty -six (566) PM peak hour trips for any uses on the presently undeveloped lots in the Plat of RCA Boulevard Center, the Plat of West Park Center and the Plat of South Park Center: Contract let for construction of one eastbound right -turn lane at the intersection of Burns Road and Alternate A -1 -A, together with an extension of the storage lane for the single left -turn lane, and one westbound right - turn lane at the intersection of Burns Road and Military Trail. These improvements shall be complete and open to the public prior to issuance of any certificates of occupancy for any land uses generating more than three thousand five hundred sixty -nine (3,569) daily trips or five hundred sixty - six (566) PM peak hour trips from the undeveloped lots in the above referenced plats. - 5 - \_11 1-/ (e) Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any • undeveloped lots in the Plat of South Park Center, the contract shall be let for installation of a traffic signal at the Burns Road and Riverside Drive /West Park Drive intersection including all appropriate pavement markings, signing, lighting and the like as approved by Palm Beach County, if warranted. Iv. All parcels within the Plat of South Park Center, shall provide a signal warrant study to determine if signaliza- tion is required at the intersection of Burns Road with Riverside Drive /West Park Drive. The signal warrant study shall be based on a time frame coincident with the build - out of all development with the Plat of South Park Center, the Plat of West Park Center and the Plat of RCA Boulevard Center and shall include the total traffic generated by all previously approved projects in the Plat of RCA Boulevard Center, the Plat of West Park Center and the Plat of South Park Center as well as traffic generated by those approved projects included in the traffic study for these plats. Only the construction of the eastbound right -turn lanes at the Burns Road /Alternate A -1 -A intersection and the west- bound right -turn lane at the Burns Road /Military Trail intersection shall be.cons.idered off -site improvements. All other improvements are site related. Additional Right of Way Dedication In addition to the right -of -way dedicated on the PLAT of SOUTH PARK CENTER, the Developer, prior to plat recordation, shall dedicate such additional right -of -way as may be required for the reconstruction of the intersection of Burns Road with Alternate A- 1- A.generally described as a maximum of an additional 35 feet beginning at the intersection for a distance of 400 feet west • of the intersection with a taper to 0 feet at a point approxima- tely 830 feet west of the intersection. Provided, however, once plans are approved for the intersection, should any right - of -way which is conveyed not be required for construction of the intersection, any excess land shall be immediately reconveyed to the property owner or his successors and assigns. 23. Prior to the submittal of each PUD application the Petitioner or agent will meet on site with the City Forester to review the site conditions which the City forester wishes to be addressed in the site plan. 24. Site Plan Review /PUD - No land clearing or tree removal be allowed without written approval of the City Forester. In addition, pursuant to the PCD Plan, the owners of the properties may designate and develop areas not subject to PUD review and approval, only upon field inspection and written approval of the City Forester. As part of the application for each PUD approval, the following shall be submitted: (a) Tree survey and tree analysis prepared by a registered landscape architect or similarly qualified professional, which for trees with a caliber of three inches or more describes type of tree, location, caliber, and whether it will be removed, replaced, or relocated. (b) All existing Oak trees with a caliber of eight inches or greater will be preserved and protected during construction. - 6 - 25. The Property Owner agrees and is obligated to include or cause to be included the property ( "Property ") in any unit of develop- ment, special district, community development district or local unit of special purpose government created by a duly constituted governmental entity ( "Special District ") for the purpose of planning, establishing, acquiring, constructing, reconstructing, enlarging, extending, equipping, operating, or maintaining water management or roads and associated facilities, benefiting the Property and all or part of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida; provided, however, that all assessments for such facilities shall be imposed on a uniform basis applied pro -rata to all property benefited by the Special District (i.e., acre by acre or residence by residence) and shall be determined in accordance with the applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regu- lations of the State of Florida, County of Palm Beach and the City of Palm Beach Gardens. Provided further, that upon creation of any Special District it must be demonstrated by the Special District that direct benefit is accrued to the Property and the direct benefit to the Property as determined by the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, and any costs incurred by the Property by reason of other sections of this requirements shall be credited to the Property by such Special District. The owners of the Property shall be given not less than 120 days prior written notice before formation of any Special District and shall be entitled to participate in all proceedings relating to the Special District including the right to appeal any determination of benefit to the Property. 26. Prior to recording a Final Plat, 50% of the Cost of construction of an at grade pedestrian crossing and signalization at the Community Center on Burns Road, must be paid to the City. 27. A Helipad shall be a permitted use in this PCD. Section 5. Review of subsequent developments on the individual • PUDs shall be by the City's Planning and Zoning Commission and by the City Cooncil, and approval shall be by Resolution. A Public Hearing and publication of notice in a newspaper of general circulation for the meetings on subsequent Resolutions.shall not be required. Section 6. If any part or portion of this Ordinance shall be found to be invalid by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the Ordinance shall remain in full force and legal effect. Section 7. All Ordinances or parts,of Ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. passage. 40 Section 8. This Ordinance shall be effective upon date of - 7 - • I' �i , PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS 4th DIY OF JANUARY, 1990. PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS 18th DAY OF JANUARY, 1990. PLACED AND ADO D THIS 18th DAY OF JANUARY, 1990. !� /!mot MAYOR C UNAN MICE MAYOR � NCI A COUNCILMAN ATTEST: ` ��1ix �L�INO,74 Y. - KOSIER, 'CITY CLERK - 8 - r • 1x11 u M RESOLUTION 47, 1992 June 2, 1992 June 4, 1992 June 18, 1992 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, CREATING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS "THE ANSPACH EFFORT" ON LANDS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO, LOCATED IN THE NORTHCORP CENTER, A PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT, CREATED BY ORDINANCE 1, 1990; AND, PRO�IDING THAT SAID PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND CONDITIONS SET FORTH HEREIN, WITH AN UNDERLYING ZONING OF M-1 RESEAkH AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT; AND, FURTHER PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONF1LICT HEREWITH; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: Section 1. A Planned Unit Development known as "THE ANSPACH EFFORT" is hereby created on lands described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, located in the NORTHCORP CENTER, a Planned Community District, created by ordinance 1, 1990. The underlying zoning for said Planned Unit Development shall be M -1 Research and Light Industrial Park District. Section 2. Development of this Plarined Unit Development shall be subject to the plans and specifications and conditions as hereinafter set forth: A. Plans and Specifications: 1. Site Plan prepared by Jones & Song, dated April 30, 1992, consisting of one sheet marked Al. 2. 3 4. 42 6. North, South, East and West Elevations, prepared by Jones & Song,ldated April 17, 1992, consisting of one sheet marked A5. Landscape Plan prepared by The SWA Group, dated May 1, 1992, and consisting of one sheet marked LS -1. Landscape for Phase 2 West Elevation Plan prepared by the SWA Groupldated 6/9/92 consisting of Sheet 1 of 2. Additional Landscape for East Service Area Plan prepared by the SWA Group dated 6/9/92 consisting of Sheet 2 of Zj. Landscape Plan at Main En The SWA Group dated 6/3/9 Sheet 1 of 1. 1 rance prepared by , consisting of res47.92 B. Conditions: • 1. The five -foot sidewalks pri subject property along Nor, Riverside Drive shall be c the issuance of the Certif: • • on the Parkway and cted prior to of Occupancy. The property owner or successors and assigns shall comply with Condition 25 of Section 4 as set forth in Ordinance i, 1990. 3. The,property owner or successors and assigns shall comply with the Department of Environmental Regulation'slconsent order. 4. All trees designated for die during construction construction practices, using the following sche of tree caliper lost, th tree caliper shall be re specie. The replacement minimum three -inch calip preservation that orl because of shall be replaced Jule: For every inch re inches of new placed of like tree shall have a erl diameter. 5. Prior to the issuance of Occupancy the Landscape A: shall certify in writing landscaping has been comp approved landscape plans. to the approved landscape approved by City. Council. the certified letter from Architect, the City Fores the site for compliance. been confirmed by the Cit Building Department shall Prior to construction,'tr clusters which have been preservation as per the 1 be properly tagged. The within the drip line of t preserved where desirable clearing, the developer s maintain protective barri line of all trees or vege protected. This work sha approved by the City Fore issuance of any building land clearing. Section 1 Protection).paragraphs B, be enforced during constr 7. All roof - mounted equipmen from line -of -sight view. 8. The approval is for a Lig] only with trip generation: submitted traffic study. 9. In consideration of an un] completion of Riverside D: particularly as location relate to the East area o Development site, petitioi obtaining a Building Perm . post a bond or letter of the placement of such imp: (2) years from effective 4 The requisite amount of mi e Certificate of hitect of record the City that the ted per the Any minor changes Tans shall be Once the City has he Landscape r shall inspect nce compliance has Forester, the City ,e notified. es or vegetated esignated for ndscape plan shall egetation falling ese trees shall be Prior to land all erect and rs around the drip ated clusters to be l.be inspected and ter prior to ermit requiring 3.50 (Tree C and D shall also ction. shall be screened t Manufacturing use based on the nown date of ive realignment, f improvements the Planned Unit er shall, prior to t for construction, redit guaranteeing ovements within two ate. nev therefor shall res47.92 determined by the City Manager. No Building Permit shall be issued until the bond is • posted. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for Phase II or within three (3) years from the effective date hereof, whichever occurs first, the Petitioner shall comply with the landscape /streetscape program. • Section 3. All development under this Planned Unit Development shall be completed within three (3) years from effective date hereof. The City Council ay consider an extension of said time period for no more than one (1) year, provided a Petition for Time Extension is filed prior to date of expiration and good cause is established by Petitioner. Action by the City council on such.a Petition may be taken without intervention of the Planning and oning Commission or published notice of hearing. Approval or denial shall be by, Resolution. Section 4. All Resolutions or parts of Resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 5. This Resolution shall be effective upon date of adoption. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS /j DAY OF JUNE, 1992. t C /t(cCrC &A MAYOR [MICHAEL MARTINO ATTEST: LINDA V. KOSIER, CITY CLERK VOTE: AYE NAY MAYOR MARTINO VICE MAYOR RUSSO COUNCILMAN ALDRED COUNCILWOMAN MONROE COUNCILMAN KISELEWSKI • 3 res47.92 • 1 2 3 4 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1024 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 RESOLUTION 11, 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA APPR AMENDMENT TO ALLOW FOR A BUILDING LOCATED ON LOT 2 OF THI COMPRISES LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (PCD), GE THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TI RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND NORTHCORP PARTICULARY DESCRIBED HEREIN; PF PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS; AND PF DATE. Date Prepared: December 21, 2004 OF THE CITY OF PALM )VING A SITE PLAN 17,270 SQUARE FOOT E. 7.0 -ACRE SITE WHICH NORTHCORP PLANNED NERALLY LOCATED AT IE INTERSECTION OF PARKWAY, AS MORE OVIDING FOR WAIVERS; OVIDING AN EFFECTIVE WHEREAS, on June 18, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution 47, 1992 allowing 33,485 square feet to be used for the manufacture of medical equipment on a 7 -acre site to be completed in one phase, of development within the NorthCorp PCD; and WHEREAS, on November 18, 1992, the City Council approved Resolution, 107, 1992 amending the site plan for the Anspach Effort; and WHEREAS, on September 23, 1997, City staff granted an Administrative Approval for a 17,032 square -foot Phase II expansion to the building, as well as changes to the landscape plan, amending the site plan for the Anspach Effort; and WHEREAS, on November 23, 1999, the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee granted approval for the addition of 37 parking spaces on the site, amending the site plan for the Anspach Effort; and WHEREAS, on June 5, 2003, the City Council granted approval for the addition of 37 parking spaces on Lots 1 and 2 of the NorthCoip PCD, amending the site plan for the Anspach Effort with the adoption of Resolution 98, 2003; and 35 WHEREAS, the City has received an application from Don Hearing of Cotluer 36 , and Hearing, on behalf of Anspach Holdings, Ltd., fo- approval of a 17;270 square -foot 37 building located on Lot 1 of the 7.0 -acre site which comprises Lots 1 and 2 of the 38 NorthCorp PCD, generally located at the southwist corner of the intersection of 39 Riverside Drive and as more particularly described helrein; and 40 41 WHEREAS, the subject parcel is currently zoned Planned Community District 42 (PCD) Overlay with an underlying zoning of Research and Light Industrial Park (M1) 43 and a future land use designation of Industrial (1); and 44 45 WHEREAS, the Growth Management Depart ent has reviewed said application, 46 has determined that it is sufficient, and has recommended approval; and LJ 101 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 • 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 • WHEREAS, on December 14, 2004, the Play recommended approval of the amendment to the pr vote of 7 -0; and WHEREAS, the City Council has deemed ap best interest of the citizens and residents of the City Date Prepared: December 20, 2004 Resolution 11, 2005 ing, .Zoning, and Appeals Board ,iou sly-a pp roved site plan with a ival of this Resolution to be in the Palm Beach Gardens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA that: SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and ratified. SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida hereby approves a 17,270- square -foot building, located on Lot 2 of the 7.0 -acre site which comprises Lots 1 and 2 of the NorthCorp Planned C�mmunity Development (PCD), as more particularly described below: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SOUTHPARK CENTER, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 67, PAGES 87 AND 88, PUBLIC RECO14DS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. TOGETHER WITH: LOT 2, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF WEST PARK CENTER, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 67, PAGES 91 AND 92, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. �. SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida hereby approves the following waivers with this approval: 1. Section 78 -345 (d)(3) — Increase in Parking Spaces, to allow an additional 51.8% (58 spaces) over the minimum required parking spaces. The Land Development Regulations allow a maximum 10% over the minimum required parking spaces. 2. Section 78 -344 (1) — Parking Stall and Bajr Dimensions, to allow 9.5'X 18.5' parking stalls. The Land Development kegulations require a minimum 10' X 18.5' parking stall. 3. Section 78- 344(h) — Off - street Parking allow for a 30 -foot stacking distance Development Regulations require a min 2 Loading Entrances and Exits, to the south entrance. The Land am 100 -foot stacking distance. 61 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 • 24 .25 26 27 28 .29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 L_J 4. Section 78- 319(2) - Minimum Landscape of easements by more than five (5) feet the east and west landscape buffers. $£u Date Prepared: December 20, 2004 . Resolution 11, 2005 Buffer, to allow for an overlapping for required landscape buffers for 5. Section 78 -285, Permitted Signs, Table 24, to allow for the Anspach logo on the west elevation of the building, not to exceed 24 inches in height. SECTION 4. Said approval shall comply with the following additional conditions, which shall be binding upon the applicant, its successors, assigns, and/or grantees: City Engineer 1. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the applicant shall provide written permission from the easement holder(s) to allow landscaping within the easements in accordance with LDR Section 78 -306. (City Engineer) 2. Prior to. construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the applicant shall provide an adequate pavement marking and signage plan acceptable to the City Engineer. (City Engineer) 3. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the applicant shall prop ide a cross- section detail for the dry retention pond. (City Engineer) 4. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the applicant shall provide cross- section details at the property boundaries, including the roa�s, conservation easements, and retention -pond for consistency with the plan view and to match existing conditions. (City Engineer) 5. The applicant shall provide the City with copies of all permit applications, certifications, and approvals. (City Engineer) 6. The applicant shall provide all necessary construction -zone signage and fencing as required by the City Engineer. I (City Engineer) 7. The applicant shall comply with any and all Palm Beach County Traffic Division conditions as outlined in PBC Traffic Division equivalency and concurrency approval letters. (City Engineer) 8. Prior to construction plan approval ar alteration permit, the applicant shall pro, and all landscaping and irrigation costs. on a cost estimate for the project, incl landscaping and irrigation costs, which c 3 the issuance of the first land s surety for public infrastructure e required surety shall be based ng public infrastructure and all estimate shall be reviewed and • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 • 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 �J A* i� 11 12. approved by the City. The cost estimate engineer and landscape architect registe will be based on 110% of the total coma shall be posted with the City prior to the permit. (City Engineer, Building Departm Prior to construction plan approval and permit, the applicant shall provide a cc improvements, not including public irrigation costs, for review and approval t be signed and sealed by an engineer re, shall be posted with the City prior to the i (City Engineer) The applicant shall comply with all R Department of Environmental Protectii including, but not limited to, preparation c plan and identification of appropriate generally accepted by the Environment local regulatory agencies, for constructio of Intent to EPA or its designee, impl( inspection and maintenance of controls d of a Notice of Termination. (City Engine( Prior to issuance of the first land alteratic signed, sealed, and dated construction and water and sewer) and all "pertinent c review and comment. (City Engineer) Prior to construction plan approval alteration permit, the applicant shall s staff. (City Engineer) City Forester 13 14. The applicant shall install the Riversi issuance of the first Certificate of Occup 1 of South Park. (City Forester) The City shall receive documentation fi conservation easements on Lot 1 of SOL issuance of the first clearing permit or (City Forester) 4 Date Prepared: December 20, 2004 Resolution 11, 2005 shall be signed and sealed by an -ed in the State of Florida. Surety Ined approved cost estimates and ssuance of the first land alteration the issuance of the first building t estimate for the on -site project nfrastructure, landscaping, and the City. The cost estimate shall istered in the State of Florida and suance of the first building permit. :deral EPA and State of Florida m NPDES permit requirements, f a stormwater pollution prevention Best Management Practices,, as 31 Planning Agency (EPA) and /or i activities, submission of a,Notice mentation of the approved plans, uring construction, and submission r) i permit, the applicant shall submit plans (paving, grading, drainage, ilculations to the City Engineer for the issuance of the first land ule a pre- permit meeting with City e Drive landscaping prior to the ncy (CO) for the building within Lot om the applicant that the existing th Park are abandoned prior to the land alteration permit for said lot. r LJ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 •23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 • 46 15. The conservation easements for the t "Proposed Relocated Conservation Ea publicly recorded prior to the issuance alteration permit. (City Forester) 16. All the trees within the new conservation be protected during construction by bE Forester and the minimum standards de Land Development Regulations. (City For Police Department 17. Lighting locations shall not conflict with tree canopy growth. (Police Department) Date Prepared: December 20, 2004 Resolution 11, 2005 areas on the site plan labeled lent No. 1 and No. 2" shall be the first clearing permit or land easements No. 1 and No. 2 shall rricades acceptable to the City ,cribed within Section 330 of the landscaping, including long -term 18. Metal halide lighting shall be used for all street and pedestrian walkways. (Police Department) 19. Numerical addresses shall be illuminated for nighttime visibility and r shall have bi- directional visibility from the roadways. (Police Department) Miscellaneous 20. Required digital files of the approved plat�in its entirety transformed to NAD 83 State Plan Coordinate System shall b e submitted to the Planning and Zoning Division prior to issuance of the first building permit. Approved civil engineering as -built design and architectural drawings shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Division prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. (GIS Manager, Development Compliance) SECTION 5. This approval shall be in complian' ce with the following plans on file with the City's Growth Management Department: 1. Site plan and landscape plans, sheets 1I through 5, prepared by Cotleur Hearing, last revised on December 1, 2004, and received and stamped by the City on December 23, 2004. 2. KI 4. Elevations, sheet 4.1, prepared by Alan Strassler, dated December 16, 2004, and received and stamped by the City on December 16, 2004. Elevations, sheet 3.1 and 7.1, prepared b� Alan Strassler, dated November 16, 2004, and received and stamped by the City on November 19, 2004. Site Lighting Plan, sheet SL -1, prepared by Romcke Coburn Engineering, _ dated November 18, 2004, and received and stamped by the City on November 19, 2004 (1 sheet total). I• 01 1 SECTION 7. This Resolution shall become effel 2 3 4 PASSED AND ADOPTED this ld""I day of .1 5 6 7 CITY OF PALN 8 9 10 BY: 11 _ 12 ATTEST: 13 14 15 BY: 16 Patricia Snider, City Clbfk 17 18 19 20 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND 21 LEGAL SUFFICIENCY 22 l i 23 J 024 BY: 25 nstine P. Tatum, City Attorney 26 27 28 29 30 VOTE: AYE NAY 31 32 MAYOR JABLIN 33 34 VICE MAYOR RUSSO 35 36 COUNCILMEMBER DELGADO 37 38 COUNCILMEMBER LEVY .� 39 40 COUNCILMEMBER VALECHE_ 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 \ \Pbgsfile\Attorney \attorney share \RESOLUTIONS \anspach - reso 11 2005.doc 0 Date Prepared: December 20, 2004 Resolution 11,2005 Live immediately upon; adoption. wc t 2005. B ARDENS, FLORIDA l /1 ayor fil a <O E m i g_ yl / -Z —r►" / � 4 00 - . 9 a en� S3 r�i ZDrn A N 0 T OO1 2 �3ZZ� V Z L. O �� To Z � t ° r The Anspach Companies T o C3 4500 Riverside Otive s CD Pa /m Beach Gardens, FL . pq mn% §b °v 2 v omm o c cvcm� o �m vti ;�y m O90m ; S f^ �S G'^y q F •J 9�HH= O g� ° <o�0 �m A rZii �^�mip�OZ� > �H !-HI � \, OcOcoc� ~U L TTC -Im~ y ° GAN��OO G�i''IAN N'Gj p a x B gg A g wgy c = 88 Fg �v 8m� 2q mz� ym � m v..y iii bi 8 8888; 1GY� 8 8 �8� N,� w -b" 88888' 8� v cc o z� gF vNOb� �� a,���°'B�G� 8 8ri��" ,°•$p w Y 8',� m 8� moD� 92Z lz n \ W p'� Zp D�g�p�6O qj DP Dojo -a g o yrb"rd'm�A�GI qy�SEp3�Cm n��+m$ p �O �S�bZsm�O Z A Ao 7� 2� 99! n; ! R i 8F :1 1, Inn am' Rss 9 „;oo YA g LRAM° EPS�a� 10w€ R fn ^o Rh 4€ Q8 sgs gig •: 4 � ° R € ao 11- 9mg g o o n \ g 40 Hnggggqgy gg °2F @p O � Y y ccn n ca n cH w n vti , � M •, 5jg � 8",x �j€66 G R [_. . .¢ i � •B-32BB Q MIL R ARV TRAIL INTERSTATE 95 g a .y�3 � ° d} A °�R0Oe3':,g�p9aS. d MIL R ARV TRAIL INTERSTATE 95 g a mTheAns p ach Com p anies 67 4500 Riverside Drive Palm Beach Gardens, Florida e ^ ♦o �'D J .i:$9 8W v S INTERSTATE 95 p g N 3 e. r, p _ ►� ° o i 4500 Riverside Drive x g a gg�e� °yy `�qfg a �3 a 11 � 4rn Z �I z am MoD � gm s N� �z R F $ o im Ing, lim1p, gym; � u €�� . r S g pq All g win nA MILITARY TRML S INTERSTATE 95 p g N 3 e. r, p _ ►� ° o 4500 Riverside Drive x j Lnu a aw Palm Beach Gardens, FL �3 1 \cam o\ I °� M n pj° F Vfl, "Mq j w W �9 M POPH fill HAT m Q� m m g 3 rn �N F NUNEZ 7� Z. C. y�Lypypy$$((NN m 8�Q$yN �" PI NIImp� r�pOt� " "m y Cnmy CC COC b � oao�� NpN y �m myA�N��6� WHO MCIMP -H 7 HO I mapp ` �i fi R • �g p~o �m�� 'a �L13 mu`Ii p�Om 3 �O Hog�7p m Orn�$0N� €� zOnZ r'�+ st y�p2 ti rpnmmT •lf l° � A ai 4 __s W muugPts��a8aY gs ��_ y$ sf$sss g F m ; m9 5 The Anspach Companies p g N 3 e. r, p _ ►� ° o 4500 Riverside Drive x j Lnu Palm Beach Gardens, FL �3 • • f.m WE z Z � T N { 03 2 0 O 2y K y T V ix Sn z C) i m m m 14 a � I i _ 1 1 I4 it a & e b m IK -_ �i k zo -.-:n IIj m ^ti m n pq- O m m M D � N �R! H a" I p�sg n 8 9 3 N � S � •� I— — r� � � z i • A fi L A ry 7111 N � I 'a. 9$ N n yFC � N cm'� The Anspach Colnpanles _ 4500 Riverside Drive °t Palm Beach Gardens, Florida f yw T � L J f� N cm'� The Anspach Colnpanles _ 4500 Riverside Drive °t Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 0 N cm'� The Anspach Colnpanles _ 4500 Riverside Drive °t Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 00000000000 >OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOCOOOOOC.•JO O OOOOOOOOOOOJJO . 3' . -. Iwo!`" ► �� NX NO "ASi"N�� -- • • v o��..!�wo..aew_sae, - ►��F ;.a��,v:\MMAK.+C► /► r — �'I EB EB EB CB EB 1 CB • EB EEC J�6 EM EB�j p e I �\ � � ►��� BBB d - "�� �� 1�'w'r! �` ��•we. a�rc►QN � - -- ' ►a��a��van�a;�� rTii��ir►i!s�L�'II► �Il�fili�Ct���i�.i��ti���i'�� ,, � \�-���, EB —' IBEX � �� = ��4�� ■��. "' ;/ EB � ►��. ti II II �I II I i y A 'V `S� 0. =000 OCOO�`_ \� I •� �'' 11ee' ..v UOOO 1 00000. NTT •r I loll' � y 16 19 IB I� 1� IB IB �ye�• f; g The Ass ach Com anies `U1� Gym ►1 /'� � � CD JI N 4500 Riverside Drive d Palm Seach Gardens, Florida �3 � 0 0. 0 ;` :�" � -$ &7�^ Ln 4'F`'pR �Sg 3 Iii V) i °� rn �-I V Ag � � a �� Alm En gg zm Z r 'g m O R� a� rn mad m� 9 age g i I N 1 9 A, Q rn a tic 4 R z R $ a Lm a z� DoT y D slog im IT A a ago O a� nll m WIt v SIR •._ rn -i III �I� °!— 7U IM fig` ; 109 q9 DO~ iiii;R R a =III =1 p M € 3 rn AES � -i aI,A m « Its Mcic�l � V D mn= z illm IM p Him ggg-z Sgg ' E �s° o a = -JII— III =III =9R aq o Anspach companies A�� o 9= �$ 4500 Riverside Drive x �. �s Palm Beach Gardens, Florida r z AS�PP °g!✓r' ltl�GC�� YGG.... Gam.. °.G �Sd�R�d :�eepq�n�pi�G�,�J,?�cc;�pSY 4 c n _ 33a w' a- yn NvL� y - 0000 nnnn 000^ 'rrn 00 rn NNN�N �NNNNNN y � a Anspach companies A�� o 9= �$ 4500 Riverside Drive x �. �s Palm Beach Gardens, Florida r .cA o I I `ti • I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I v I I I I I I I ' I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I P I I ' I I I I I ' I I I I I m I I 1 r < D I I I I I �,• 0 I Z I i If 'rr6 I I I I r -, Z I I o I I m 0 I I m I I I I < I I D L_J I 0 ' Z I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I aa g� I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4—T.1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 1 I I I I 1 I I I � I I I _ - K A N S P A C H BUILDING c cn _ = r �" "" "° '� "' "° 0fh116Ct °` °' design _� oc aorwc D aesaciatea r - io n z(— PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA A a l � - O > u� n f� s p rr n LL A N S P A C H BUILDING c cn _ = r �" "" "° '� "' "° 0fh116Ct °` °' design _� oc aorwc Fr] aesaciatea r . eunmMC . u•.•circ JsHny d. g p.tw z(— PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA woo c.ui,.,,...,. r.r w.•• a...., n n..° •_• ••• ••• r� l •• -•�• martyr „ ®,,,, �. , -a �^ •� •++ •�^� �• (561) 6�6 -7J61 ICI 0 0 0 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CL A aa �• I I I I I v I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ® I I I I I I I I j I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I j I I I I I I I P I I I I I I I I o I I I I I I rn I I I I I I I I –• —� � I I I I I I � c I I I I I I GS I I I I I t3 ,- D O I I I I , "Y �.•5• Z ® I O I r D I I – I I I I I I I I r I I I I I frl I I I I I I I D I I I I I i I I I I I I O I I I –J I I z I I I I I I I , 1 ® I 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ® I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I Fm IE I I I , I I I , !I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I CO ANSPACH BUILDING c_ un r m a, °my r,a,r in• „—d up architecturol design assaaia tes _ __ _ _ r— orvrioci «c . eunoiea . u.e•mNC )eltrey d. gopstur PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA .+•• ra ..r. wr ma (561) 626 -7381 > s V) a OX i I a 0�`�� m i m m N t7 U 0 CO ANSPACH BUILDING c_ un r m a, °my r,a,r in• „—d up architecturol design assaaia tes _ __ _ _ r— orvrioci «c . eunoiea . u.e•mNC )eltrey d. gopstur PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA .+•• ra ..r. wr ma (561) 626 -7381 r • • • D c_ C/) r QwhLy. r— IAe &.9.Ne 9P architectural design =_ D f= > rnp � a I a I jeffrey 0. 90pstGr o> o> n fi f i I C)r4 nEI� o L a ° n n Y 1a9Qf� pC - ------------ ------ ------ - ____ —___ _ ___ 1'�) m 0 i� -- 1 - - m > o o I I 0 I I I II r � iga z - - - - -- " ------ ------ ------- v------ I_ ------------ —_ _ _ _ ------ ------ _ II I I `J I I I " A D c_ C/) r QwhLy. r— IAe &.9.Ne 9P architectural design =_ D f= > rnp � a I a I jeffrey 0. 90pstGr o> o> n fi f i I C)r4 nEI� o L a ° n n ANSPACH BLDG c_ C/) r QwhLy. r— IAe &.9.Ne 9P architectural design =_ f= associates PARCEL 56 �_ r DEVELOPING. WILDING. 49NAGIIG jeffrey 0. 90pstGr PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA zr .Soo cemu„m, Ner...w. 9.aen ara.m, n v.IO 5 < „3. -..a, r.3 <S.I, 991- 534p��*M� —1— ^I�g (561) 626 -7361 7 0 L LLE -7 co A N S P A C H BLDG c= guAllly. Prom the t—d up. Orchitectur01 design - _ Ossoclotes PARCEL 5B o m zeaao PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA DEVELOPING • BUILDING • MANAGING w.n,.�. wn. PMn u.N a..d.N. rt n,IO n D m IYI 0 Z9 I j A m AMA 01, o oy n 0 Am A N I I L. II II II I I I I I � II II II II II II — —I ------ I I I I I I I ------ ------ ------ I I I I � I - - - -- I I I I II tl II — — I I I I I I --0 I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I mr - - - - -- r �n m o ❑� I Z!z I I II ° D o� I I y I II I I I I I > 0 I I I I I 0 I m -0 I� I v N D N - - - - -- Ire, I I I I __—_— I I - -__— _— I I __ —_�_ I I I I _- _ Ll I I I I II II II II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II II II II II II I II II II I I I � I N I I I I I II II II II I II m co A N S P A C H BLDG c= guAllly. Prom the t—d up. Orchitectur01 design - _ Ossoclotes PARCEL 5B o m zeaao PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA DEVELOPING • BUILDING • MANAGING w.n,.�. wn. PMn u.N a..d.N. rt n,IO DpI I 0 Z9 I j A m AMA 01, o oy n 0 Am A N L. co A N S P A C H BLDG c= guAllly. Prom the t—d up. Orchitectur01 design - _ Ossoclotes PARCEL 5B o m zeaao PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA DEVELOPING • BUILDING • MANAGING w.n,.�. wn. PMn u.N a..d.N. rt n,IO Jeffrey d. gopetur walnKl N+ �A� NAB ew.., A.M. lwo (561) 626 -7387 ffivo-Ilim-io-, u Q1111tr. Front mr gr—d �p architectural design associates - -_ -- -- D I a mZ�O> n �� — 1 0 n D A u 1°i Z POP tl on m z I / l m lJ I m U p O N 0 'P, II II II II I I I I I I I I II II II II II II II - - -� - I I I - - ------ ------ I I I ------ II II II -------- - - -o - ------ -- ------- - - - - ------ -- - -- - - - - -- - - -o y T L J i � I I s it I I l D Z-- - - - -' - - - - -- - - -- -- - - - - -� - -o - - - ----- - - -I - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - -o II II �II II I I I I I I I I II II it II II II II II I I I I I I II II II II II I II I i i i I � I � i I I I II I II i i u Q1111tr. Front mr gr—d �p architectural design associates - -_ -- -- D I a mZ�O> n �� — 1 0 n D A u 1°i Z Or tl on m z I / l m lJ I m U p O N 0 ANSPACH BLDG C C F :E Q1111tr. Front mr gr—d �p architectural design associates - -_ -- -- PARCEL 5 B 0 Z o LOP NC • BUILDING • u.N.aNC jeffrsy d. gapstur °l wt.t PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 1W C aruw °v. Pem ° PN Wn ., IL 31 i° " "' °`' ° °' ° " °' "° • —•rte -- 0rl) 62 (561) 628 -7181 L F, • • HN9 4 pa � q I � I ----------- III � I `� II II II I I I I II II I I II I � II II 1 iI I i TI m 4 c m z 6 w ��g F\�lll I R I so^- IJ Q S I II 1 I I n design _ f = g> _ ivies � DEVELOPING BUILDING MANAGING I I °o >o> . B.NF�N.n,,.lo (ssll ey. -esey (sell -sus. a n i i A � p � I III N n Q z FO O I II it I $ g F ' 8 m II I n I II Z JI I I I I ___ -- I II I S Quehty IF— the Bround up architectural design _ f = g> _ associates DEVELOPING BUILDING MANAGING R I °o >o> . B.NF�N.n,,.lo (ssll ey. -esey (sell -sus. a n i i A � p � rr G N n Q z R 11Y PER FT. SLOPE II I I I I , II II I II I I II II II ,j II I I I I II III I II II I III u iu I` I I 1 I I � I l;� "I - - - - - - - -- - - - --1 II I I I I M I FON LL I j 11 I L ;II I I -- - - - - -- ------ ------ II I I n II II I I I` I 1 I 1 /4' PER !T. SLOP[ I II II II I - -- - -- - - -- - -- - -- - - - ---- II I II II II I I I I I I I III _________ I II A N S P A C H BLDG � Quehty IF— the Bround up architectural design _ f = associates DEVELOPING BUILDING MANAGING PARCEL 58 Jeffrey d. gapstur "" It�t PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA Z . B.NF�N.n,,.lo (ssll ey. -esey (sell -sus. ....� ,� f1°9O" aoavo!eE" .a* e.m� ....�• e.N. sw�o (561) 626 -7381 mmmlll 01 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM TO: Craig Kunkle, PZAB Chairman FROM: Talal M. Benothman, Planning Manager DATE: January 20, 2oo6 SUBJECT: January 24, 20o6 PZAB Workshop for: Petition PCD- 04 -01: Cimarron Cove — Rezoning and Master Development Plan Approval Petition SP- 04 -05: Cimarron Cove — Site Plan Approval The applicant for the above - referenced petitions requested to be placed on the January 24, 2oo6, PZAB agenda in order to receive input and direction from the Board relative to the revised development plans. Due to the date of submission of the plans by the applicant, staff did not have adequate time to prepare a staff report for this agenda item. The applicant will be making a presentation to the Board during the hearing. • Should you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at (561) 799-4233• C. Planning, Zoning and Appeals Boardmembers Charles K. Wu, Growth Management Administrator • k VA 0 • CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD Agenda Cover Memorandum Date Prepared: January 10, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: PUD -04 -11 Subject/Agenda Item: PUD- 04 -11: Parcels 31.06 and 31.07 - Central Park Residential High and Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development Workshop: A request by Land Design South, on behalf of EB Developers, Inc., for rezoning and site plan approval of Parcels 31.06 and Parcel 31.07. Both parcels currently have a Planned Development Area (PDA) zoning designation. Parcel 31.06 is proposed to be rezoned to- a Planned Unit Development/Residential High (PUD/RH) zoning district with 116 condominiums. Parcel 31.07 is proposed to be rezoned to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (PUD/MXD) with 60 condominiums, 99,934 square feet of commercial and office development, and a 141,706 square - foot, 409 -space parking garage. The approximately 41.75 -acre subject site is located at the southwest corner of Hood Road and Central Boulevard and is bounded on the west by Interstate 95 and Westwood Lakes PUD. [X] Request comment and direction on the subject petition [ ] Recommendation to DENY Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Finance P &Z Action: Planning Manager: Growth Management: Ad ' istrator: [ ] Approved ]App. w/ conditions B y:.' . Labossiere Fees Paid [Yes] - [ ]Denied [ ] Rec. approval Talal M. Benothman, AICP Jacki lloman, AICP Assistant City Attorney: Planner/Project Mgr. per memo 1/5/06 [ .] Rec. app. w/ conds. [ ] kec. Denial [ ] Quasi —Judicial [ ] Legislative [ ] Continued to: Nancy Stroud [ ] Public Hearing Funding Source: Development Compliance Manager: [X] Workshop [ ] Operating [X] Other NA Advertised: [ ]Notified [X] Not Required Attachments: . .Applicant's Narrative pp • DRC Comments Plans and Elevations Bahareh Wolfs, AICP Grvqh Management Budget Acct. #: tor' N/A Charles KK.. Wu, AICP Approved By: City Manager: Affected Parties: [ ] Notified Ronald M. Ferris [X] Not Required 1. Date Prepared: January 10, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: PUD -04 -11 • BACKGROUND The subject site is vacant and consists of approximately 41.75 acres and is known as Parcels 31.06/31.07. It is located at the southwest corner of Hood Road and Central Boulevard. The property is bounded by Hood Road on the north, Central Boulevard on the east and south, and Interstate 95 and Westwood Gardens/Westwood Lakes Planned Unit Development on the west. The property was previously owned by the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and was subsequently sold to Communities Finance Company /Watermark Communities, Inc. The current owner /developer of the property is Palm Beach Developers, LLC/ EB Developers, Inc., of Boca Raton. These parcels were included in the Forbearance Agreement approved by the City Council through the adoption of Resolution 59, 1999 on April 15, 1999. Exhibit C (Declarations of Covenants and Restrictions) of the Forbearance Agreement allowed 200 multifamily residential units and a 0.25 FAR (floor area ratio) for the commercial area. At staff's request to reduce the density of the site, the applicant is proposing 116 townhouse -style condominium dwelling units on Parcel 31.06 and 60 townhouse -style condominiums on Parcel 31.07, for a total of 176 residential units. The proposed development will be constructed in one phase, according to the applicant. LAND -USE & ZONING The subject site consists of two land -use designations. The northern 20.66 -acre Parcel 31.06 has a • land -use designation of Residential High (RH). The southern 21.16 -acre Parcel 31.07 has a land- use designation of Mixed Use (MXD). Both parcels have zoning designations of Planned Development Area (PDA). The Land Development Regulations define a PDA as a large tract of land that is established as a holding zone until an application for development order approval is submitted. The applicant is proposing to rezone Parcel 31.06 to a Residential High (RH)/Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay zoning district, with a density of 5.6 dwelling units per acre (116 units on 20.66 acres). The applicant is proposing to rezone Parcel 31.07 to a Mixed Use (MXD)/Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay zoning district, with a density of 6.8 dwelling units per acre (60 units on 8.81 acres). Under the Forebearance Agreement mentioned above, these parcels were limited to three (3) units per acre, for a total of 125 dwelling units. Of these units, only 59 would have been allowed on Parcel 31.07. However, by letter dated January 2, 2003, the City authorized the transfer of 75 residential units from the property included within the Old Palm PCD, for a total of 200 residential units allowed for both parcels. Parcel _31.0 Based on the Future Land -use Map of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the predominant land -use within this 20.66 -acre parcel is Residential. Due to Parcel 31.06 having a land -use designation of Residential, it is not necessary for the applicant to provide any mixed -use land allocation analysis for this portion of the site. •Parcel 31.07 The Future Land -use Map of the City's Comprehensive Plan designates this 21.16 -acre portion of 2 Date Prepared: January 10, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: PUD -04 -11 •the site as Mixed -Use. The property must have a minimum of three uses from the following use categories: residential, neighborhood commercial, employment center, and open space. The applicant is developing this parcel as a Residential Mixed Use PUD, but is requesting a waiver from the residential mixed -use requirement of Section 78- 175(f) of the LDRs. This code provision requires that 20% of the residential high units provided on site shall be located above the ground floor of a non - residential use. If this waiver is granted, there will be no residential uses on the second floors of the neighborhood commercial buildings. • 40 Policy 1.1.1.3 of the City's Comprehensive Plan requires a land allocation and building lot coverage calculation for the required uses. First, the applicant must provide for a percentage of land allocated for each use from the total acreage. Second, the applicant must then provide for a percentage of lot coverage within each land -use allocation, within the parameters specified in the Comprehensive Plan and the LDRs. The following table summarizes the applicant's proposal, as compared to the Comprehensive Plan requirements: PARCEL 31.07 MIXED USE /PUD USE PROPOSED REQUIRED /ALLOWED CONSISTENT? ALLOCATION a p i �A �. p tai �� .; ✓ ���p,`Y��^ , $P4sr E a f �' ;, y w �i i W U P �:�`�yaa - 5'. �3C iPi..:sa u�l .ti . .�'.M:. 0k7x Land allocation 42.35% 8.75 ac. 15% / 3.1 ac. Yes - exceeds Lot coverage N/A N/A N/A N/A NEIG�TB® GG , ; Og coMmERCAL� Land allocation 26.37% 5.58 ac. 2% - 30% max. Yes Lot coverage * 25% 60,767* sf 70% max. (2.52 ac.) Yes Land allocation 41.63% 8.81 ac. 20% min / 60% max. Yes Density .60 units 6.8 d.u. /ac. 59 units -- P r F EN[ s b, Land allocation 17% 3.6 ac. 2% min / 30% max Yes Lot coverage* 25 % 39,167* sf 70% max. (2.52 ac.) Yes (1.05 acre) ACREAGE 21.16 ac. TOTAL SQ. FT. Yes COMMERCIAL * 99,934* sf The existing land uses and zoning designations of properties surrounding the property are provided in the following table: • Date Prepared: January 10, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: PUD -04 -11 CONCURRENCY A traffic study has been submitted as part of the concurrency review process. In a letter dated December 14, 2005, Palm Beach County Engineering Traffic Division has determined that the proposed development meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County for concurrency reservation, with certain conditions which are listed under "Outstanding Issues" in this report. The property has been approved for 176 multi- family residential units (condominiums), 24,512 square feet General Retail, 39,167 square feet General Office, 14,655 square feet Restaurant, and 21,600 square feet Furniture Store. Should the 21,600 square -foot furniture store space be • converted to other types of retail in the future, a specific traffic analysis shall be required. Please note that no medical office space has been included in this concurrency approval. • The build -out date for this project is December 31, 2008, after which no building permits shall be issued. Pursuant to Section 78 -61 of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant shall be required to apply for a time extension for any portion of the project that is not completed by this date. Impact on Public Services and Surrounding The Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA) will be the provider of both potable water and sanitary sewer services. The Petitioner has met with SUA to discuss servicing of the proposed development and has responded to SUA comments. A standard school concurrency application was submitted to the School District of Palm Beach County. The District has reviewed the application, determined that adequate capacity exists for the proposed development, and approved school concurrency, which expires on November 29, 2006. The Solid Waste Authority will provide refuse removal services. Theses services will include curb- side pick -up within both residential areas as well as servicing of the commercial core. Staff is asking that a designated area be shown on the plans for placement of refuse containers. 4 Subject Property Planned Development Area Residential High and Vacant - PDA (PDA) Mixed -Use (MXD) North Hood Road and San Michele Residential Low (RL3) Residential Low (RL) South Planned Development Area Central Boulevard, I -95, and Parcel 31.04 (Cimarron Cove) (PDA) Mixed (MXD) East Central Boulevard and Planned Development Area Residential Medium (RM) Parcel 31.04 (Cimarron Cove and Paloma) (PDA) West Interstate 95 and Planned Unit Development Mixed -Use (MXD) Westwood Lakes/Westwood Gardens PUD (PUD) CONCURRENCY A traffic study has been submitted as part of the concurrency review process. In a letter dated December 14, 2005, Palm Beach County Engineering Traffic Division has determined that the proposed development meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County for concurrency reservation, with certain conditions which are listed under "Outstanding Issues" in this report. The property has been approved for 176 multi- family residential units (condominiums), 24,512 square feet General Retail, 39,167 square feet General Office, 14,655 square feet Restaurant, and 21,600 square feet Furniture Store. Should the 21,600 square -foot furniture store space be • converted to other types of retail in the future, a specific traffic analysis shall be required. Please note that no medical office space has been included in this concurrency approval. • The build -out date for this project is December 31, 2008, after which no building permits shall be issued. Pursuant to Section 78 -61 of the Land Development Regulations, the applicant shall be required to apply for a time extension for any portion of the project that is not completed by this date. Impact on Public Services and Surrounding The Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA) will be the provider of both potable water and sanitary sewer services. The Petitioner has met with SUA to discuss servicing of the proposed development and has responded to SUA comments. A standard school concurrency application was submitted to the School District of Palm Beach County. The District has reviewed the application, determined that adequate capacity exists for the proposed development, and approved school concurrency, which expires on November 29, 2006. The Solid Waste Authority will provide refuse removal services. Theses services will include curb- side pick -up within both residential areas as well as servicing of the commercial core. Staff is asking that a designated area be shown on the plans for placement of refuse containers. 4 Date Prepared: January 10, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: PUD -04 -11 PROJECT DETAILS The proposed development plan consists of 176 multi - family residential condominiums units, with 24,512 square feet of general retail space, 39,167 square feet professional office space, 14,655 square feet of restaurant space, and 21,600 square feet of furniture store space. Access and Traffic Circulation The proposed development will have two (2) access points off the 120 -foot Central Boulevard and one (1) access point off Hood Road. The two Central Boulevard access points will provide a direct link between Central Boulevard and the primary street that runs through the commercial core of the project. A series of secondary 40 -foot local roads will link each residential area to the commercial core. All residential entries will be gated with access provided through a card reader system. The western entry to the residential units located on Parcel 31.06 will function as a "Residents Only" entrance. Parking Parcel 31.06 requires one parking space for each of the 300 bedrooms, plus 5% or 15 spaces for guest parking, for a total of 315 residential parking spaces. The site plan provides 316 parking spaces, of which 232 are garage spaces, 68 are driveway spaces, and 16 are guest parking. Only one bicycle space is required, but a total of six (6) spaces are being provided at the internal bus shelter and at the on -site recreation area. Parcel 31.07 requires one space for each of the 150 bedrooms, plus 5% or 8 spaces for guest parking, for a total of 158 residential parking spaces. The site plan provides 160 parking spaces, of which 120 are garage spaces, 30 are driveway spaces, and 10 are guest parking. The retail portion of Parcel 31.07 requires 429 spaces, and 433 spaces are being provided. Of these spaces, 409 will be within the four -level parking garage, and 24 spaces will be surface parking. Handicap parking spaces total 13, when 9 spaces are required. The three (3) required loading spaces have been provided on the west side of Commercial Buildings B, C, and D. These three loading zones also are intended to serve Buildings F and G. Buildings B thru G are interconnected via ground floor and second floor colonnades through which merchandise /items can be transported from the service area to each retail or office bay. In addition, the streetscape of the commercial area also provides two additional turn- off -areas adjacent to both buildings A and C and F and G. Although not specifically called out as loading areas, both spaces provide additional room for the delivery of articles. Building A, which is reserved for a furniture store /interior design studio, is served by an exclusive loading bay. ®pen Space and Upland Preservation Parcel 31.06 has 10.52 acres (50.91 %) of open space, when 8.26 acres (40.0 %) are required. Parcel 31.07 proposes 8.75 acres (41.35 %) of open space, when 3.1 acres (15 %) are required. Parcel 31.06 has 2.97 acres of upland preserve, and Parcel 31.07 has 3.70 acres, for a total of 6.67 Date Prepared: January 10, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: PUD -04 -11 • acres, while only 6.65 acres of upland preserve are required. (Prior to scheduling for formal Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board action, the applicant shall demonstrate required open space can be met when counting only 50% of the manmade water bodies and 50% of the recreation area facility, as required by Section 78= 681(b)(])a. of the LDRs.) In May of 2005, the subject property was affected by significant brush fires that degraded the quality of the proposed 6.7 acres of upland preserve acreage. This area, was previously heavily wooded with a mix of native and exotic upland and wetland plant species. Enhancement planting of similar native species will occur in those areas affected by the fire. "The applicant has provided a draft of a "Preserve Area Management Plan," which includes language regarding maintenance of the preserves to help reduce potential risks from a wildfire. This plan has been reviewed and accepted by staff and the City's environmental consultant. Landscaping and Buf erin The total landscape points required for the Residential High Parcel 31.06, is 17;729, and 30,540 points have been provided. The total landscape points required for the Mixed -Use Parcel 31.07 is 13,704, and 22,648 points have been provided. Section 78 -319 of the LDR requires a minimum landscape buffer of at least 20 feet in depth on lands located adjacent to public street rights -of -way that are 100 feet wide or greater. The right -of- way for Central Boulevard is 120 feet wide. Lake maintenance easements are prohibited within • required perimeter buffers, and the proposed plan has two lake maintenance easements within the Central Boulevard buffer. (Please note: Concurrent with this petition, the applicant proposes to submit a petition to request an amendment to the Land, Development Regulations, Section 78- 319(b)(2), Minimum landscape buffer and planting, to allow permanent lakes, water features; and accompanying lake maintenance easements to be located within required landscape buffers.) Prior to scheduling for formal Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board action, staff is requesting that the plans be revised to show a meandering sidewalk with low groundcover adjacent to Central Boulevard between the two site entrances. The sidewalk shall be consistent with that proposed from Hood Road to the northern site entrance. Parkway Program Section 78 -231 of the LDRs identifies both Central Boulevard and Hood Road as part of the Parkway Overlay District. The parkway requirements include a 90 -foot parkway easement on either side of the right -of -way and the provision of meandering sidewalks and supplemental landscaping in this area. For Hood Road, a 149 -foot minimum easement is proposed, and,Central Boulevard has a proposed 13 -foot minimum easement. Drainage • This property is located within Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District's (NPBCID) I Date Prepared: January.10, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: PUD -04 -11 •Unit of Development No. 2A. Buildings within this development will be set at or above the 100- year flood elevation (17.5NGVD). Drainage will be handled through a series of inlets and culverts that outfall into the five lakes on site and will subsequently outfall through San Michele to the north. Architecture Both the residential high and. mixed -use parcels will incorporate architecture that provides a modern interpretation of classic Mediterranean design, according to the applicant. The general architectural characteristics of the building are as follows: 1. Residential Units: a. Multi -level 2 and 3 -story units with textured stucco exteriors b. Minimum 2 -car garages with panel doors C. Gable, hip, and/or Boston hip roof styles with Spanish S tile roofs d. Incorporation of pergola -style structures and climbing landscape materials above side - loaded garages e. Non -flush front and side elevations 2. Commercial Buildings and Parking Garage a. Seven multi -level 2 and 3 -story commercial buildings with columns, awnings and/or arcades, window and door banding • b. Articulated streetscape program C. Decorative paving d. Four -level parking garage with arches and decorative screening Art in Public Places The applicant is proposing three (3) locations for the public art: 1. The main entry to the northern residential development; 2. The roundabout located within the central commercial development; and 3. The pedestrian plaza situated on the 1.56 -acre lake tract within. the commercial development. On September 20, 2005, the Art in Public Places Advisory Board expressed no objections to the proposed locations. The applicant will return later for a recommendation for the specific art. Signage The applicant has provided a master signage plan, which shall be reviewed by both the Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board and the City Council in conjunction with this site plan. The master signage plan includes monument signs, wall signs, directional signs, traffic control signs, street name signs, enter and exit signs, directory signs, and street address signs. Waivers are being •requested regarding number of sign faces for residential entry signs and various other proposed signs. 7 • Waivers • • Date Prepared: January 10, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: PUD -04 -11 Waivers Re uested Development Regulation Proposed Required Standard Deviation 22' (RES.DRIVEWAYS Drive Aisle Width ONLY) 24' (two -way traffic) 2' LDR Section 78-344(m) RH /PUD Permitted Use Multi- family (Condo) Allowed in RM or RMH TBD by Dev. Order LDR Section 78 -159, Table 21 20' L.M.E. for all but +/- +/ -140' of lake tract Required L.M.E. 140' of lake tract shoreline Continuous 20' L.M.E. shoreline (See Plan) LDR Section 78 -563 Issuance of bldg. permits Plat Requirements for model homes Adoption of plat prior to Plat requirement LDR Section 78 -441 prior to plat Issuance of bldg. permits Permitted Signs Max. of 2 sign faces for Max. of 1 sign face for 1 sign face LDR Section 78 -285, table 24 residential entry signage residential entry signage Front and side landscaping Less than required Sign Landscaping width not less than sign front and side LDR Section 78 -287 (c) Various locations height landsca in g width Preserve Area Minimum 15' length or Minimum 25' length or width Requirements width of preserve area of reserve area 10' of preserve width LDR Section 78 -316b ROW Cross Section 40' ROW 50' ROW 10' LDR Section 78-498(f) 10' x 18.5' Parking Spaces 9.5' x 18.5' (Surface) > 10'x 18.5 .5' (Surface Parking) 1' x .5 ' (Commercial LDR Section 78- 344(I)(1)a. 9'x 18' (Commercial Garage) Garage) 0% of second floor SF: to 20% of second floor SF. to MXD. Res. Requirement be dedicated to residential be dedicated to residential 20% x 60 units = 12 LDR Section 78-157(f) 1 island per 27 spaces 1 Island per 9 sp. Landscape Islands (Parking garage only) (Parking garage only) 18 sp. LDR Section 78-315(b) Foundation Planting Width to be 30% of 2 +- Various plantings where LDR Section 78- 320(a) story building height/ 1 possible along the facades. shade tree or palm cluster per 30' of facade width. Planters installed on the Planters installed along the Note: Does not meet Multilevel Parking Garages top level for tree roof perimeter with requirements of Code LDR Section 78 -315 g installation plantings W. Date Prepared: January 10, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: PUD -04 -11 • CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Parcel 31.07 is classified 'as a residential MXD; therefore, it is required to comply with the residential MXD intensity measures established in Policy 1.1.1.3. of the City's Comprehensive Plan and reiterated in Section 78- 157(g) of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDR's). Policy 1.1.1.3. of the City's Comprehensive Plan requires that at least 51 % of the gross square footage of the Commercial use within a non - residential MXD be contained in buildings having a two (2) story character containing some actual two (2) story space. Section 78- 175(f) of the LDRs requires that 20% of the residential high units provided on site shall be located above the ground floor of a non - residential use. The applicant is requesting a waiver from this Code requirement in order to provide retail space on the second floors. STAFF COMMENTS AND /OR MAJOR OUTSTANDING ISSUES An application is needed requesting amendment to Land Development Regulations Section 78 -319, Minimum landscape buffer and planting, that would allow lake maintenance easements within landscape buffers and/or parkway easements. 2. Seacoast Utility Authority requests: a. Revisions to the plans to properly show street light placement in the south residential • portion of the project. b. Location of proposed light poles along Hood Road to be adjusted to clear the 10 -foot utility easement. 3. City Forester's comments: a. The landscape plan needs to be revised to show planters for the installation of trees on the top level of the parking garage as.required by Code. b. Prior to scheduling for Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board formal action, the landscape plans shall be revised to include nine palms along the west fagade of the parking garage meeting the minimum height requirement of 22 -28- in overall height. c. Prior to scheduling for Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board formal action, staff is requesting that the plans be revised to show a meandering sidewalk with low groundcover adjacent to Central Boulevard between the two site entrances. The sidewalk shall be consistent with that proposed from Hood Road to the northern site entrance. d. Prior to scheduling for Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board formal action, the applicant shall demonstrate required open space can be met when counting only 50% of the manmade water bodies and 50% of the recreation area facility. • I Date Prepared: January 10, 2006 Meeting Date: January 24, 2006 Petition: PUD -04 -11 . f. Prior to scheduling for Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board formal action, the applicant shall work with the City Forester to revise the CAD files to document the amount of open space provided for the entire site. 4. Engineering Comments - For brevity, please refer to attached LBFH letter dated January 11, 2006. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff requests comment and direction from the Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board on the subject development proposal. • WCentral Park/Staff Report PZAB Workshop • 10 LAND •DESIGN.. Land Planning Landscape Architecture SOUTH Environmental Consultation JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT Central Park A Planned Mixed -Use Development Submitted April 13, 2004 Resubmitted January 11, 2006 Request The purpose of this request is for final site plan approval and rezoning from a Planned Development Area (PDA) to the Mixed- Use /Planned Unit Development Overlay District (MXD /PUD) and the Residential High /Planned Unit Development Overlay District (RH /PUD) for two (2) parcels, of land located at the southwest corner of Hood Road and Central Boulevard. This request also involves final site plan approval for parcel 31.06 which includes 116 townhouse -style condominium ownership dwelling units and parcel 31.07 to the south which includes 60 townhouse -style condominium ownership dwelling units, 99,934 SF. of commercial development and a 141,706 SF. parking garage. • Land Use and Zoninq Designations The subject property consists of approximately 41.82 -acres located at the southwest corner of Hood Road and Central Boulevard. The current zoning designation is PDA (Planned Development Area) and the land use is split between RH (Residential High) to the north on parcel 31.06 and MXD (Mixed Use Development) to the south on parcel 31.07. The RH land use accounts for approximately 20.66 -acres while the MXD land use consists of approximately 21.16- acres. The proposed zoning designation of RH with a PUD overlay for parcel 31.06 and MXD with a PUD overlay for parcel 31.07 is consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan land use designations. Directly adjacent to the northern boundary of this property is the Hood Road right -of -way and just north of Hood Road is the San Michele development. San Michele has a zoning designation of RL3, a land use designation of RL, and consists of single - family residential development. To the east of the subject property is Central Boulevard and currently undeveloped land with a zoning designation of PDA and a land use of RH /MXD. Future development plans for this parcel include a mix of single - family residential and commercial development. This future development will be known as Esperanza. To the south of the subject property is Interstate 95 as well as undeveloped property with a current zoning designation of PDA and a land use of MXD. To the west of the subject property is the Westwood Lakes Gardens development which has a current zoning designation of RM and a land use of RL. Westwood Lakes Gardens consists of single- family residential dwelling units. • Compliance /Land Use 2101 Centrepark West Drive, Suite 100 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 1 561- 478 -8501 FAX 561 - 478 -5012 1100 St. Lucie West Blvd., Suite 103A I Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 1 772 - 871 -7778 FAX 772- 871 -9992 The proposed MXD /PUD overlay and RH /PUD overlay zoning designations are consistent with the MXD /RH Comprehensive Plan Land Use designations. The subject property has recently been affected by significant brush fires that have degraded the quality of existing upland preserve acreage. The site plan currently shows a total of 6.67 AC. of upland preserve area. Further investigation of the site will be required in order to re- evaluate upland preserve requirements. Phasing The proposed development will be constructed in one phase. Access The proposed development will have two (2) access points off of the 120 -foot Central Boulevard right -of -way and one (1) access point off of the Hood Road right -of -way. The two (2) Central Boulevard access points will provide a direct link between Central Boulevard and the primary street that runs through the commercial core of the project. A series of secondary 40 -foot local roads will link each residential area to commercial core. All residential entries will be gated with access provided through a card reader system. The western entry to the residential units located on parcel 31.06 will function as a "Resident's Only" entrance while the other three (3) will be open to both residents and guests. Vehicular Parking The Final Site Plans for both parcels 31.06 and 31.07 provide a breakdown of required and provided vehicular parking for residential, neighborhood commercial and employment center uses. • Bicycle Parkin Again, the Final Site Plans for both parcels 31.06 and 31.07 provide a breakdown of required and provided bicycle parking for residential, neighborhood commercial and employment center uses. The proposed development satisfies and even exceeds the minimum required number of bicycle parking spaces. Impact on Public Services and Surrounding Area A traffic study has been submitted as part of the concurrency review process. The traffic study states that the proposed project complies with the traffic provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. The Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA) will be the provider of both potable water and sanitary sewer services. The Petitioner has met with SUA to discuss servicing of the proposed development. A standard school concurrency application was submitted to the School District of Palm Beach County. The District has reviewed the application and determined that there does exist adequate capacity for the proposed development. The Solid Waste Authority will provide refuse removal services. Theses services will include curb -side pick -up within both residential areas as well as servicing of the commercial core. Parkway Overlay District The subject property fronts both Hood Road and Central Boulevard and therefore lies within the Parkway Overlay District established by the City. According to LDR Section 78- 231(f)(1), the • typical parkway cross section for Central Boulevard is a 300 -foot corridor, which includes a 120 - foot right -of -way and subsequent 90 -foot parkway easement on either side of the right -of -way. 2101 Centrepark West Drive, Suite 100 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 1 561 - 478 -8501 FAX 561 - 478 -5012 1100 St. Lucie West Blvd., Suite 103A I Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 1 772 - 871 -7778 FAX 772 - 871 -9992 Section 78- 231(f)(1) also states that a minimum 11 -foot planting strip for tree canopy be • provided adjacent to the road right -of -way; followed by a 6 -foot meandering path; followed by a 10 -foot wide strip for tree canopy; followed by a 63 -foot wide corridor of native vegetation or enhanced landscape area. The required parkway cross section for Hood Road includes a 200 -foot corridor with a 110 -foot right -of -way and subsequent 90 -foot parkway easement. Again, a minimum 11 -foot planting strip for tree canopy shall be provided adjacent to the road right -of -way; followed by a 6 -foot meandering path; followed by a 10 -foot wide strip for tree canopy; followed by a 63 -foot wide corridor of native vegetation or enhanced landscape area. The Comprehensive Plan allows developers to request waivers from the standards for the Parkway Overlay District. The Petitioner proposes the following waivers in reference to the cross sections provided along both Hood Road and Central Boulevard. The Petitioner is not requesting waivers for the total acreage that would be dedicated for parkway easements by the standard parkway corridor cross sections provided by LDR Section 78 -213. As detailed on the attached Final Site Plans, the Petitioner is proposing a 113 -foot to 122 - foot variable width parkway easement adjacent to upland preserve, wetland, and wetland buffer areas along the western side of Central Boulevard Adjacent to the Central Boulevard right -of -way, the petitioner is proposing a 12 to 22 foot wide area which will include various low plantings and a meandering 6 foot pathway. Due to the existing upland preserve and Seacoast Utility easements, the width and landscape options within this area are very limited. In areas where existing lake tract, proposed lake tract, and access points are directly adjacent to Central Boulevard, the Petitioner is proposing a variable width parkway • easement between 11 -feet and 24 -feet in width. The proposed 6 -foot paved path will also be directly connected to four (4) sidewalks that parallel each of the two access points from Central Boulevard. The Petitioner strongly feels that the proposed location of the 6 -foot paved path and landscaping will preserve a much greater quantity of native upland vegetation within the designated upland preserve areas. • Similar to the proposed Central Boulevard parkway easement, the Petitioner is proposing a 149 -foot to 152 -foot variable width parkway easement adjacent to Hood Road. Adjacent to the Hood Road right -of -way, the petitioner is proposing a 30 to 53 foot wide area which will include various low plantings and a meandering &foot pathway. Due to the existing upland preserve and Seacoast Utility easements, the width and landscape options within this area are very limited. The proposed 6 -foot paved path will connect with the Central Boulevard path system in order to enhance pedestrian connection within the City. The Petitioner strongly feels that the proposed location of the 6 -foot paved path and landscaping will preserve a much greater quantity of native upland', vegetation within the designated upland preserve areas. As previously stated, the Petitioner is not requesting a reduction in the amount of acreage that would dedicated for parkway easements along both Hood Road and Central Boulevard. Instead, the Petitioner proposes a re- distribution of acreage in order to address access, water retention, existing easements, and environmental preservation issues associated with this site. The following table provides a detailed breakdown of the required, provided, and redistributed parkway easement acreage for project frontage along both Hood Road and Central Boulevard: 2101 Centrepark West Drive, Suite 100 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 1 561- 478 -8501 FAX 561 - 478 -5012 1100 St. Lucie West Blvd., Suite 103A I Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 1 772 - 871 -7778 FAX 772- 871 -9992 Required and Proposed Parkway Easement Widths and Acreages Required Easement Width Provided Easement Width (Upland) Provided Easement Width (Lake Tract/Access Points) Required Easement Area Provided Easement Area Hood Road 90' 149' Min. 27' Min. 1.63 AC. 2.76 AC. Central Boulevard 90' 113' Min. 11' Min. 4.59 AC. 4.93 AC. Art in Public Places Pursuant to LDR Section 78 -261, the proposed development will incorporate up to three (3) pieces of public art based upon the total dollar construction value of the project. These three (3) pieces will be located in each of the following areas: 1. The main entry to the residential portion of parcel 31.06 2. The roundabout located in parcel 31.07 3. The pedestrian plaza situated on the 1.56 -acre lake tract within parcel 31.07 The Petitioner acknowledges that final selection of artwork is subject to recommendation by the Art In Public Places Committee and final approval by the City Council. The proposed locations for public art are consistent with LDR Section 78- 261(b)(5) as follows: a. Visibility: All proposed public art locations are visible to both internal and external pedestrian and vehicular traffic. In addition, both locations adjacent to the commercial core on parcel 31.07 serve as major focal points that have been incorporated into the overall development plan. b. Planning Integration: Again,'all public art locations are highly visible and serve as integral components of the proposed development. 40 c. Landscape Integration: All landscape has been designed to complement the proposed art locations and will be further refined upon the final selection of pieces. d. Lighting: All proposed public art will be tastefully lit in an unobtrusive manner. Landscaping Included with this submittal are Landscape Plans that detail typical units, perimeter landscape buffers, the recreation area, parkway corridor enhancement, entry and signage, and streetscape. The required landscape points are based on a definition of open space that includes perimeter buffers, pervious landscape area between structures and one half of the proposed recreation area acreage. Pursuant to a meeting with the City Forrester, the Petitioner has excluded lake tract, upland preserve, wetland preserve, wetland buffer and perimeter easements from this calculation. In addition, no credit has been assigned to existing vegetation present within or potentially to be added to the upland preserve. The proposed landscaping is consistent with similar planned developments in terms of selected plant material and proposed sizes at the time of installation. Lighting A Photometric Plan signed and sealed by an engineer registered in the state of Florida has been included with this resubmittal. Drainage Drainage for the subject property will be handled through a series of inlets and culverts that • outfall into adjacent lakes. 2101 Centrepark West Drive, Suite 100 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 1 561 - 478 -8501 FAX 561 - 478 -5012 1100 St. Lucie West Blvd., Suite 103A I Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 1 772 - 871 -7778 FAX 772 - 871 -9992 • Signa-ge The applicant has included a complete signage package produced by Baron Sign manufacturing that details all proposed monument, directional, building, traffic, and addressing signage. All proposed signage will be consistent with the proposed architecture in terms of material, finish, and color. Final location of all proposed traffic signage shall be established by the Engineer of Record. Architectural Style and Special Features The residential high and mixed -use La Mariposa development will incorporate architecture that provides a modern interpretation of classic Mediterranean design. Quality and thoughtfulness in detail will help to establish this development as a major destination point within the City. The following provides general design guidelines for the proposed residential and commercial structures: 1. Residential Units: a. Multi -level 2 and 3 story units b. Textured stucco exteriors c. Double roll or Spanish S the concrete roofs d. Minimum 2 -car garages e. Panel garage and entry doors f. Gable, hip, and /or Boston hip roof styles g. Band treatments around windows and doors visible at street level h. Incorporation of pergola -style structures and climbing landscape material above side - loaded garages i. Non -flush front and side elevations • 2. Commercial Buildings and Parking Garages a. Multi -level 2 and 3 -story buildings b. Textured stucco exteriors c. Awnings and /or arcades d. Representational columns e. Double roll or Spanish S tile concrete roofs f. Band treatments around windows and doors visible at street level g. Highly articulated streetscape program, h. Decorative paving Land Development Regulation Compliance for Parcel 31.06: RH /PUD Overlay_ District The purpose of this submittal is to request a rezoning of parcels 31.06 and 31.07 from the PDA zoning district to the RH /PUD overlay and MXD /PUD overlay zoning districts, respectively. According to LDR Sections 78 -139 and 78 -154, an RH /PUD zoned property must satisfy the following requirements: a. Composition, Purpose and Intent: The proposed 116 multi- family condominium style dwelling units on the 20.66 AC. parcel 31.06 create an aesthetically pleasing, living environment in close proximity to a major commercial, service and employment center located on parcel 31.07. Large sections of Upland Preserve adjacent to both Hood Road and Central Boulevard buffer internal development from rights -of -way. Direct vehicular and pedestrian connections will exist between both parcels. b. Land Use: The proposed RH /PUD development is considered a residential PUD. c. Zoning: In accordance with LDR Section 78 -154, parcel 31.06 will be rezoned to • an underlying RH land use with a residential PUD overlay. 2101 Centrepark West Drive, Suite 100 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 1 561- 478 -8501 FAX 561- 478 -5012 1100 St. Lucie West Blvd., Suite 103A I Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 1 772 - 871 -7778 FAX 772- 871 -9992 d. Permitted Uses: Although not directly permitted under the RH zoning district, the • requested PUD overlay permits City Council approval of a multi - family use. A total of 116 DU. high -end condominium ownership dwelling units are proposed for Parcel 31.06. A waiver from LDR Section 78 -159, Table 21: Permitted, Conditional, and Prohibited Use Chart will be requested in order to permit multi- family structures within the RH zoning district. e. Unified Control. Parcel 31.06 is under the control of a single-entity. f. Density. The proposed gross density of 5.61 DUJAC. does not exceed allowable density permitted under the Plan. A density bonus has not been requested with this application. g. Property Development Regulations: The proposed development on Parcel 31.06 satisfies almost all Property Development Regulations described in LDR Section 78 -141, Table 10: Property Development Regulations — Residential Zoning Districts forthe RH zoning district. • Property Development Regulations Chart The following table identifies the required and proposed property development regulations for parcel 31.06 under the RH zoning district. This table also indicates if the requirement has been satisfied or if a waiver has been requested: Property Develo ment Regulations — RH /PUD Parcel 31.06 Required Proposed Satisfaction of Code Requirement Site Area 9.73 AC. * 20.66 AC. Yes Lot Width 100' 700' Min. Yes Gross Density 10 DU./AC. 5.61 DU./AC. Yes Lot Coverage 50% 41.1% Yes Building Height NMT 45' 34' -3" Yes Setbacks Front 42.4' " 125' Yes Side 32.4' * ** 169' Yes Side Street 32.4' * * 169' Yes Rear 32.4'*** 132' Yes * Min. 7,500 SF. for first DU. and min. 3,278 SF. for each additional DU. ** 30' plus 1' for each foot of building height greater than two (2) stories * ** 20' plus 1' for each foot of building height greater than two 2 stories • Requested Waivers 2101 Centrepark West Drive, Suite 100 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 1 561 - 478 -8501 FAX 561 - 478 -5012 1100 St. Lucie West Blvd., Suite 103A I Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 1 772 - 871 -7778 FAX 772 - 871 -9992 The following table provides a breakdown of requested waivers for parcel 31.06. Per LDR • Section 78 -154, a development with a PUD overlay may request waivers from specified property development regulations in an effort to encourage creative and innovative design. • • Waiver Requests: RH /PUD Parcel 31.06 Development Regulation Proposed Standard Required Standard Deviation Parkway Corridors 6' Paved Ped. /Bike Path Refer to LDR Sec. 78 -231 TBD by Dev. Order LDR Section 78-231(f)(1) 22' (RES.DRIVEWAYS Drive Aisle Width ONLY) 24' (two -way traffic) 2' LDR Section 78-344(m) RH /PUD Permitted Use Multi- family (Condo) Refer to LDR Sec. 78 -159 TBD by Dev. Order LDR Section 78 -159, Table 21 20' L.M.E. for all but +/- +/ -140' of lake tract Required L.M.E. 140' of lake tract shoreline Continuous 20' L.M.E. shoreline (See Plan) LDR Section 78 -563 Issuance of bldg. permits Plat Requirements for model homes Adoption of plat prior to Plat requirement LDR Section 78 -441 prior to plat Issuance of bldg. permits Permitted Signs Max. of 2 sign faces for Max. of 1 sign face for 1 sign face LDR Section 78 -285, table 24 residential entry si na a residential entry si na e Preserve Area Requirements Minimum 100' length or Minimum 15' length or width 85' of preserve width LDR Section 78 -250 (a)(3) width of preserve area, of preserve area. ROW Cross Section 40' RAS 50' ROW 10' LDR Section 78 -498(f 20' Landscape Buffer Upland Preserve area adjacent to 100' ROW Landscape Buffer and Lake Tracts. (Hood Rd./ Central Blvd.) (See Plan) LDR Section 78-319(a)(2) .5' (SUR. PARKING) 10' Wide Parking Spaces 9.5' (SURFACE PARKING) 1' (GARAGE PARKING) Per Row 9' (GARAGE PARKING) 10' SP. Permitted Signs Various Front and side (See Plan) landscaping width not less LDR Section 78 -285 See Plan than height of sign. The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 231(f)(1) in reference to the design of the required parkway corridor. A discussion of this waiver request is provided within the section of this document titled Parkway Overlay District. The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 344(m), which requires a minimum 24 -foot wide drive aisle for two -way traffic. This development proposes a minimum 22' foot wide drive aisle for two -way traffic for parking areas adjacent to residential units only. The Petitioner feels that a 22 -foot wide aisle is more than satisfactory to accommodate vehicles that service private residences. The additional 2' of unused space has been utilized to provide enhanced landscaping that will visually buffer parking areas and compliment the unique architecture of these residences. 2101 Centrepark West Drive, Suite 100 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 1 561 - 478 -8501 FAX 561 - 478 -5012 1100 St. Lucie West Blvd., Suite 103A I Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 1 772 -871 -7778 FAX 772 - 871 -9992 The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -159, Table 121, requests that a •typically non- permitted RH district use of multifamily be permitted within this development. The proposed product consists of high - quality buildings that have been architecturally detailed to perceptually feel like larger, independent structures. The units are not stacked together in consistent horizontal or vertical rows. Instead, variety and is achieved by interlocking units both horizontally and vertically similar to the pieces of a puzzle. The petitioner is also requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -563, which again requires a continuous 20' lake maintenance easement around the edge of all permanent lakes. This development proposes the 20' L.M.E. for all but +/ -140' of lake tract shoreline. The +/ -140' is located along both sides of the proposed bridge to the north of building F. Because there will be adequate access to the lake along the'bridge itself and from the east and west sides of the lake tracts for any necessary maintenance to the lake, the petitioner would like to request the approval of this waiver. The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -441, which requires the adoption of the plat prior to the issuance of any building permits. The request .is to -allow the issuance of building permits for models homes only, prior to the adoption of the plat. This is often allowed in other municipalities for marketing purposes and these homes would not be issued a certificate of occupancy until the plat was issued. The petitioner is requesting a waiver from .LDR Section 78 -285, Table 24, which limits the signage for a residential developments entrance to a maximum of one sign face. The request is to allow for a maximum of two sign faces for the residential developments entry"signage. A double -faced entry sign is being proposed within the entry median at the Hood Road entrance of • the northern residential area. The petitioner feels that 'one sign face does not allow enough project identification for guests 'and future residents of }the development. Two sign faces would allow passing traffic to identify the development from both directions more safely. The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -250 (a)(3), which requires a minimum 100' length or width of preserve area to be maintained where these areas are proposed. The site plan proposes a minimum width of 15', which is only in the western portion of the site where the upland preserve forms an irregular shape and also surrounding the wetland preserve. In all other areas, the minimum preserve width is 71'. The required upland preserve acreage of 6.65 AC. has been met. The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 498(f) which requires a 50' ROW for a local roadway. The site plan proposes a 40' residential access street with sidewalks included on both sides of the roadway where units are proposed on both sides and a single walk where units are proposed on only one side of the roadway.', The petitioner feels that for the relatively small size and number of units proposed, the 40' residential access street will provide adequate pedestrian and vehicular circulation. The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 319(a)(2), which requires a 20' landscape buffer adjacent to 100' of ROW, which includes Central Boulevard and Hood Road. The site plan proposes 71' minimum width of upland preserve and lake tract areas to provide buffering. The petitioner feels that the 71' upland preserve and lake tract areas will provide a more than adequate buffer between the development and the above mentioned ROW's. • The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 344(m) which refers to the permitted and proposed number of 10' wide parking spaces. The Petitioner is requesting a waiver to 2101 Centrepark West Drive, Suite 100 1 West.Palm Beach, Florida 33409 1 561 - 478 -8501 FAX 561 - 478 -5012 1100 St. Lucie West Blvd., Suite 103A I Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 1 772 -871 -7778 FAX 772 - 871 -9992 permit a maximum of 9.5' wide surface parking spaces and 9' wide parking garage spaces as • opposed to the unspecified 10' wide parking space requirement. The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -285, which requires ground- mounted signs and entry signs to have a minimum front and side landscaping width of at least the height of the sign minimum. Due to space and easement restrictions on the site plan, this waiver is necessary to provide adequate signage needed for the project. Land Development Regulation Compliance for Parcel 31.07: MXD /PUD Overlay District The purpose of this request is for the rezoning of parcels 31.06 and 31.07 from the PDA district to the RH /PUD overlay and MXD /PUD overlay districts, respectively. According to LDR Sections 78 -154 and 78 -157, an MXD /PUD zoned property must satisfy the following requirements: a. Purpose and Intent: The proposed 60 dwelling units on the 21.16 AC of Parcel 31.07 qualifies as infill -type development because previously approved and constructed single - family residential and three (3) major rights -of -way form impermeable boundaries around the parcel. The proposed MXD /PUD limits sprawl and instead provides clustered development surrounded by preserved uplands and wetlands. b. Definitions: The proposed mixed -use development fosters a pedestrian oriented "main street" with ground level retail and restaurant opportunities that connect to a 12 -foot wide paved pedestrian /bicycle path located within parkway corridor easements adjacent to Hood Road and Central Boulevard. This downtown pedestrian area is not only 0 perceptually linked to the residential development on parcel 31.06 through architecture, landscape and streetscape design elements but is also physically linked through paved vehicular and pedestrian circulation routes. c. Land Use: The subject property consists of an MXD land use category. d. Rezoning: This submittal includes requests for the RH /PUD Overlay zoning district for parcel 31.06 and the MXD /PUD overlay zoning district for parcel 31.07. e. MXD General Development Standards: The proposed MXD also includes a request for the required PUD overlay district. As previously discussed, the proposed development incorporates interconnected pedestrian circulation systems between multiple uses and the City's Parkway System. In addition, the proposed MXD contains frontage on a minimum of one (1) arterial road as defined by the City's Comprehensive Plan. f. Residential MXD Intensity Measures and Special Definitions: The following tables provide a breakdown of required and proposed land uses, building heights, land allocation, and lot coverage for MXD /PUD parcel 31.07. In addition to required density /intensity and allocation measures per the City's LDR, parcels 31.06 and 31.07 also is subject to several recorded documents that limit the development potential of the property. The first restrictive document consists of a Supplement to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions ( "Supplemental Declaration ") dated March 28, 2003 which places a maximum of .25 FAR on commercial uses on the property. This Supplemental Declaration in conjunction with a letter from the City dated January 2, 2003 guarantees a maximum of up to 200 multi - family dwelling `units on parcels 31.06 and 31.07 exclusive of previous density restrictions. A 3 DU./AC. restriction does not appear within the recorded Supplemental Declaration and lapsed with the expiration of the forbearance agreement previously established on the property. 2101 Centrepark West Drive, Suite 100 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 1 561 - 478 -8501 FAX 561 - 478 -5012 1100 St. Lucie West Blvd., Suite 103A I Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 1 772 - 871 -7778 FAX 772 - 871 -9992 • • MXD /PUD Open Space Calculations per LDR Section 78 -157, Table 18 and Supplemental Declaration Required Calculation Proposed Calculation Land Allocation 3.17 AC. 15% .15 21.16 AC. = 3.17 AC. 8.75 AC. 41.35% .4135(21.16 AC.) _ 8.75 AC. Lot Coverage N/A N/A N/A N/A Building Height N/A N/A N/A N/A Notes: None MXD /PUD Neighborhood Commercial Calculations per LDR Section 78 -157, Table 18 and Supplemental Declaration Required Calculation Proposed Calculation Land Allocation .42 AC. Min. 2% .02 21.16 AC. _ .42 AC. 5.58 AC. 26.37% 60,767 SF. @ .25 FAR = 5.58 AC.* Allocation 6.35 AC. Max. 30% .30(21.16 AC.) = 6.35 AC. 3.60 AC. 17% 5.58 AC./21.16 AC. = 26.37% Lot Coverage 3.47 AC. Max. 70% .70 4.96 AC. = 3.47 AC. 1.24 AC. (25 %) 60,767 SF./5.58 AC. = 25% Building Height 2 Story Min. N/A 2 Stories N/A 4 Story Max. N/A N/A N/A Notes: * .25 FAR restriction per recorded Supplement to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions ( "Supplemental Declaration" ) dated March 28, 2003 MXD /PUD Em to ment Center Calculations per LDR Section 78 -157, Table 18, Supplemental Declaration Required Calculation Proposed Calculation Land Allocation .42 AC. Min. 2% .02 21.16 AC. _ .42 AC. 3.60 AC. 17% 39,167 SF. @ .25 FAR = 3.60 AC. 6.35 AC. Max. .30(21.16 AC.) = 6.35 30% AC. 3.60 AC./21.16 AC. = 17% 2.95 AC. Max. - 1.05 AC. (25 %) Lot Coverage 70% .70 4.22 AC. = 2.95 AC. 39,167 SF. /3.60 AC. = 25% Building Height 4 Story Max. N/A 2 Story N/A Notes: * .25 FAR restriction per recorded Supplement to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions ( "Supplemental Declaration ") dated March 28, 2003 2101 Centrepark West Drive, Suite 100 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 1 561- 478 -8501 FAX 561 - 478 -501 1100 St. Lucie West Blvd., Suite 103A I Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 1 772 - 871 -7778 FAX 772 - 871 -9992 • • k MXD /PUD Residential High Calculations per LDR Section 78 -157, Table 18, Supplemental Declaration and City Correspondence Development Regulation Required Calculation Proposed Calculation Land Allocation 4.23 AC. Min. 20% .20 21.16 AC. = 4.23 AC. 8.81 AC. 41.63% 21.16 AC -(3.1 7 AC. +5.58 AC. +3.60 AC. = 8.81 AC. 12.70 AC. Max. 60% .60 21.16 AC. = 12.70 AC. ers a 4.41 AC. Max. 50% .50 8.81 AC. = 4.41 AC. 3.62 AC. 41.1% 157,825 SF./8.81 AC. = 41.1% lding FHOetivi ht 2 Story Min. N/A 3 Story N/A 0% of second floor SF. to 4 Story Max. N /A_ N/A N/A Total DU. Up to 200 DU. N/A 60 DU. N/A Density 15 DU./AC. Max. N/A 6.81 DU./AC. 60 DU./8.81 DU./AC. = 6.81 DU./AC. Notes: ' Maximum of 200 multi - family DU. permitted on parcels 31.06 and 31.07 per City correspondence dated January 2, 2003 and recorded Supplement to Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions ( "Supplemental Declaration ") dated March 28, 2003. The recorded Supplemental Declaration does not provide for a 'maximum density of 3 DU. /AC. Requested Waivers The following table provides a breakdown of requested waivers for parcel 31.07. Per LDR Section 78 -154, a development with a PUD overlay may request waivers from specified property development regulations in an effort to encourage creative and innovative design. Waiver Requests: MXD /PUD Parcel 31.07 Development Regulation Proposed Standard Required Standard Deviation Parkway Corridors 6' Paved Ped. /Bike.Path Refer to LDR Sec. 78 -231 TBD by Dev. Order LDR Section 78- 231(f)(1 24' Drive Aisle Width (RES. DRIVEWAYS) 22' (RES. DRIVEWAYS ONLY) 24' (two -way traffic) 2' LDR Section 78-344(m) 0% of second floor SF. to 25 % of second floor SF. to MXD. Res. Requirement be dedicated to residential be dedicated to residential 25% LDR Section 78-157(f) 1 Island per 9 sp. 1 Island per 27 sp. Landscape Islands (Parking garage only) (Parking garage only) 18 sp. LDR Section 78-315(b) .5' (SUR. PARKING) 10' Wide Parking Spaces 9.5' (SURFACE PARKING) 1' (GARAGE PARKING) Per Row 9' (GARAGE PARKING) 10' SP. 18.5' Long Parking Spaces Per Row 18' (GARAGE PARKING) _ 18.5' SP. .5' (GARAGE ONLY) LDR Section 78- 344(1) 20' L.M.E. for all but +/- +/ -140' of lake tract Required L.M.E. 140' of lake tract shoreline Continuous 20' L.M.E. shoreline (See Plan) LDR Section 78 -563 2101 Centrepark West Drive, Suite 100 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 1 561- 478 -8501 FAX 561 - 478 -5012 , 1100 St. Lucie West Blvd., Suite 103A I Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 1 772 - 871 -7778 FAX 772 - 871 -9992 • • The Petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 231(f)(1) in reference to the design of the required parkway corridor. A discussion of this waiver request is provided within the section titled Parkway Overlay District. The Petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 344(m), which requires a minimum 24 -foot wide drive aisle for two -way traffic. This development proposes a minimum 22 -foot wide drive aisle for two -way traffic for parking areas adjacent to residential units only. The Petitioner feels that a 22 -foot wide aisle is more than satisfactory to accommodate vehicles that service private residences. The additional 2' of unused space has been utilized to provide enhanced landscaping that will visually buffer parking areas and compliment the unique architecture of these residences. The Petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 157(f) which requires a minimum of 25% of the total square footage allocated for neighborhood commercial use to be reserved for second or third floor residential units. The Petitioner feels that the reservation of this square footage, or approximately 15,193 SF. (60,767 SF. x 25% = 15,192 SF.), is not significant enough to encourage residential CPTED principles within the commercial core of the project. Instead, the Petitioner feels that the incorporation of retail, office and restaurant use types in conjunction with strong pedestrian and vehicular connections to adjacent residential areas would provide the increased street life intended by this Code provision. • 2101 Centrepark West Drive, Suite 100 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 1 561- 478 -8501 FAX 561 - 478 -501 1100 St. Lucie West Blvd., Suite 103A I Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 1 772 - 871 -7778 FAX 772- 871 -9992 Issuance of bldg. permits Plat Requirements for model homes Adoption of plat prior to Plat requirement LDR Section 78-441 Prior to plat Issuance of bldg. permits Permitted Signs Max. of 2 sign faces for Max. of 1 sign face for 1 sign face LDR Section 78 -285, table 24 residential entry si na a residential entry si na e Foundation Planting Width to be 30% of 2 +- Various plantings where (See Plan) story building height/ 1 possible along the facades. shade tree or palm cluster (See Plan) per 30' of fagade width. LDR Section 78-320(a) Planters installed on the Planters installed along the Multilevel Parking Garages top level for tree roof perimeter with (See Plan) LDR Section 78 -315 installation plantings Preserve Area Requirements Minimum 100' length or Minimum 15' length or width 85' of preserve width LDR Section 78 -250 (a)(3) width of preserve area. of preserve area. ROW Cross Section 40' RAS 50' ROW 10' .LDR Section 78-498(f) 20' Landscape Buffer Upland Preserve area adjacent to 100' ROW Landscape Buffer and lake tracts. (Hood Rd./ Central Blvd.) (See Plan) LDR Section 78-319(a)(2) Permitted Signs Various Front and side (See Plan) landscaping width not less LDR Section 78 -285 See Plan than height of sign. Landscape Buffer 100' Min. Upland Preserve 25' landscape buffer (See Plan) LDR Section 78-319(a)(3) See Plan adjacent to 1 -95 ROW. The Petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 231(f)(1) in reference to the design of the required parkway corridor. A discussion of this waiver request is provided within the section titled Parkway Overlay District. The Petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 344(m), which requires a minimum 24 -foot wide drive aisle for two -way traffic. This development proposes a minimum 22 -foot wide drive aisle for two -way traffic for parking areas adjacent to residential units only. The Petitioner feels that a 22 -foot wide aisle is more than satisfactory to accommodate vehicles that service private residences. The additional 2' of unused space has been utilized to provide enhanced landscaping that will visually buffer parking areas and compliment the unique architecture of these residences. The Petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 157(f) which requires a minimum of 25% of the total square footage allocated for neighborhood commercial use to be reserved for second or third floor residential units. The Petitioner feels that the reservation of this square footage, or approximately 15,193 SF. (60,767 SF. x 25% = 15,192 SF.), is not significant enough to encourage residential CPTED principles within the commercial core of the project. Instead, the Petitioner feels that the incorporation of retail, office and restaurant use types in conjunction with strong pedestrian and vehicular connections to adjacent residential areas would provide the increased street life intended by this Code provision. • 2101 Centrepark West Drive, Suite 100 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 1 561- 478 -8501 FAX 561 - 478 -501 1100 St. Lucie West Blvd., Suite 103A I Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 1 772 - 871 -7778 FAX 772- 871 -9992 The Petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 315(b) which refers to the permitted • and proposed number of continuous vehicular parking spaces. The Petitioner is requesting a waiver to permit a maximum of 27 spaces per row of parking as opposed to the maximum permitted 9 spaces per row allowed by code. This increase in proposed parking spaces occurs in a single area within the commercial core of the project, directly behind the central streetscape within the parking garage. Approval of this waiver request will not adversely affect landscape treatment of parking areas since the maximum number of parking spaces per row adjacent to the streetscape is seven (7). Please also note that on the roof deck of the parking garage landscaped planters are provided around the perimeter of the structure. A variety of shrubs and groundcovers will be used within these planters in order to visually soften the mass of the parking garage structure as well as address parking garage landscape requirements. The Petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 344(m) which refers to the permitted and proposed number of 10' wide parking spaces. The Petitioner is requesting a waiver to permit a maximum of 9.5' wide surface parking spaces and 9' wide parking garage spaces as opposed to the unspecified 10' wide parking space requirement. The Petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 344(m) which refers to the permitted and proposed number of 18.5' long parking spaces. The Petitioner is requesting a waiver to permit a maximum of 18' long parking garage spaces as opposed to the unspecified 18.5' long parking space requirement. The petitioner is also requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -563, which again requires a continuous 20' lake maintenance easement around the edge of all permanent lakes. This development proposes the 20' L.M.E. for all but +/ -140' of lake tract shoreline. The +/ -140' is • located along both sides of the proposed bridge to the north of building F. Because there will be adequate access to the lake along the bridge itself and from the east and west sides of the lake tracts for any necessary maintenance to the lake, the petitioner would like to request the approval of this waiver. The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -441, which requires the adoption of the plat prior to the issuance of any building permits. The request is to allow the issuance of building permits for models homes only, prior to the adoption of the plat. This is often allowed in other municipalities for marketing purposes and these homes would not be issued a certificate of occupancy until the plat was issued. The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -285, Table 24, which limits the signage for a residential developments entrance to a maximum of one sign face. The request is to allow for a maximum of two sign faces for the residential developments entry signage. A double -faced entry sign is being proposed within the entry median at the Hood Road entrance of the northern residential area. The petitioner feels that one sign face does not allow enough project identification for guests and future residents of the development. Two sign faces would allow passing traffic to identify the development from both directions more safely. The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 320(a), a foundation planting requirement which states that the width of the planting for a building two stories or higher be 30% of the building height. This section also requires one shade tree or palm cluster to be planted per 30' of fagade width. Due to the design of the retail /commercial core area, the development does not propose to meet these requirements. The development does propose to • incorporate various planters throughout the commercial area as well as some areas of foundation planting where possible. Due to the restrictions of the lake maintenance easement 2101 Centrepark West Drive, Suite 100 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 1 561 - 478 =8501 FAX 561 - 478 -501 1100 St. Lucie West Blvd., Suite 103A I Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 1 772- 871 -7778 FAX 772 - 871 -9992 along the east side, the architectural design of the retail /commercial area, and easements along • the west side of the parking garage, the petitioner requests the approval of this waiver. The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -315 (g), which requires planters to be installed on the top level of the parking garage to be used for tree installation. This development proposes planters to be installed around the perimeter of the garage roof to be planted with hanging vegetation, which will enhance the external appearance of the garage. The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -250 (a)(3), which requires a minimum 100' length or width of preserve area to be maintained where these areas are proposed. The site plan proposes a minimum width of 15', which is only in the western portion of the site where the upland preserve forms a irregular shape and also surrounding the wetland preserve. In all other areas, the minimum preserve width is 71'. The required upland preserve acreage of 6.65 AC. has been met. The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 498(f) which requires a 50' ROW for a local roadway. The site plan proposes a 40' residential access street with sidewalks included on both sides of the roadway where units are proposed on both sides and a single walk where units are proposed on only one side of the roadway. The petitioner feels that for the relatively small size and number of units proposed, the 40' residential access street will provide adequate pedestrian and vehicular circulation. The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 319(a)(2), which requires a 20' landscape buffer adjacent to 100' of ROW, which includes Central Boulevard and Hood Road. The site plan proposes 71' minimum width of upland preserve and lake tract areas to provide is buffering. The petitioner feels that the 71' upland preserve and lake tract areas will provide a more than adequate buffer between the development and the above mentioned ROW's. The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -285, which requires ground- mounted signs and entry signs to have a minimum front and side landscaping width of at least the height of the sign minimum. Due to space and easement restrictions on the site plan, this waiver is necessary to provide adequate signage needed for the project. The petitioner is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- 319(a)(3), which requires a minimum landscape buffer of at least 25' in depth adjacent to Interstate 95. The proposed plan provides a minimum 100' Upland Preserve area between the residential units and the Interstate, which the petitioner feels is more than adequate. Compliance with Palm Beach Gardens Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element. The proposed development complies with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of this Element of the Comprehensive Plan, specifically: Goal: 1.1: "Continues to ensure a high quality living environment through a mixture land uses that will maximize Palm Beach Garden's natural and manmade resources while minimizing any threat to the health, safety, and welfare of the City's citizens that is caused by incompatible land uses and environmental degradation." The proposed project complies with this goal by providing residential and commercial uses in • addition to significant upland and wetland preserve areas within the project boundaries. 2101 Centrepark West Drive, Suite 100 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 1 561 -478 -8501 FAX 561 - 478 -5012 1100 St. Lucie West Blvd., Suite 103A I Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 1 772 -871 -7778 FAX 772 - 871 -9992 • Policy 1.1.1.3: The proposed project furthers the intent of this policy by proposing a mixed -use development at a key intersection node identified by both the Comprehensive Plan and Comprehensive Land Use Plan (Central Boulevard and 1 -95). The subject property meets the following requirements for MXD development as outlined by this policy: 1. Project contains frontage on a minimum of one (1) arterial road; Hood Road and Central Boulevard 2. Proposed development is consistent with Residential MXD land Use Category Intensity Measures (please refer to Final Site Plans) Policy 1.1.1.5: The proposed project furthers the intent of this policy by providing innovative design and land development techniques that are not permitted under by -right zoning districts. Commercial and residential uses have been centrally clustered on site in order to maintain large sections of preserved uplands and wetlands adjacent to both the Hood Road and Central Boulevard right -of -ways. In accordance with new urban design principles, residential units have been brought closer to the street and incorporate alley -like parking corridors in an effort to reduce the number of on- street garages. Furthermore, the commercial heart of the development provides a pedestrian- oriented streetscape highlighted by rich decorative paving, lush landscaping, public art, lake views, and ground level retail. A three -story parking garage rich in architectural detail and landscape treatment discretely provides required parking while eliminating a sea of asphalt. • Policy 1.1.4.1: The proposed development complies with the adopted Level of Service standards required for public services by the City of Palm Beach Gardens. The City's approval of the project's concurrency application provides the required support. Policy 1.1.5.4.(a): The proposed zoning designation for parcel 31.06 is RH /PUD while the proposed zoning designation for parcel 31.07 is MXD /PUD. Rezoning of the subject property from PDA to MXD /PUD and RH /PUD furthers the goals of this policy. Policy 1.1.6.1: The proposed development incorporates mixed . commercial and residential uses at a major node, or vehicular intersection, as indicated by the Future Land Use map. Transportation Element: The proposed development complies with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of this Element of the Comprehensive Plan, specifically: Policy 2.1.1.1: The proposed development complies with the City's adopted LOS for roadways. A traffic study has been submitted in conjunction with this application to attest to that fact. Policy 2.1.6.2: The proposed development complies with this policy by providing a • parkway corridor adjacent to both Hood Road and Central Boulevard. 2101 Centrepark West Drive, Suite 100 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 1 561- 478 -8501 FAX 561- 478 -50 1100 St. Lucie West Blvd., Suite 103A I Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 1 772 -871 -7778 FAX 772 - 871 -9992 1 h' Conservation Element: • The proposed development complies with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of this Element of the Comprehensive Plan, specifically: Policy 6.1.1.1: The proposed Final Site Plans provide for a parkway corridor along both Hood Road and Central Boulevard. This parkway will include a pedestrian /bicycle path. In addition, sidewalk will be provided throughout the entire development. Policy 6.1.5.5: Initial environmental work has been completed for this site. Any outstanding issues will be addressed prior to final site plan approval. Policy 6.1.5.6: The proposed development ensures the protection of the most valuable environmentally significant lands on site. Approximately 6.51 -acres of upland preserve and .64 -acres of wetland will be retained on site. In addition, previously submitted environmental assessments for the property do not indicate irreplaceable or irretrievable resources. Policy 6.1.9.5: An initial environmental assessment for this property was previously submitted in October 2002. Any outstanding issues will be addressed prior to final site plan approval. Recreation and Open Space Element: The proposed development complies with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of this Element of the Comprehensive Plan, specifically: • Policy 7.1.1.1: The required recreation area for the proposed 176 dwelling units is 1.60 acres. The proposed Final Site Plan provides .39 -acres of private on -site recreation. The Petitioner proposes that the remaining required recreation area be "cashed out" with the City. A process of appraisals will determine the amount paid for the remaining acreage upon approval of the Final Site Plans. • Housing, Coastal Management, and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements: The proposed project complies with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Housing, Coastal Management and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements of the Comprehensive Plan, although it does not further any of them specifically. Based upon the above referenced information and the revised attached documents, the Petitioner respectfully requests approval of both the rezoning and final site plan requests. Server\Project Files \8883 \Submittal Docs \Central Park_JustRev_1 2- 22- 05.doc File #888.3 2101 Centrepark West Drive, Suite 100 1 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 1 561 - 478 -8501 FAX 561- 478 -50 1100 St. Lucie West Blvd., Suite 103A I Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 1 772 - 871 -7778 FAX 772 - 871 -9992 Sri: 34g... 2: CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS 0 CIVIL AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES WATER & WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION SURVEY & MAPPING GIS "Partners For Results Value By Design" S.W. Corporate Pkwy. Palm City, FL 34990 (772) 286 -3883 Fax (772) 286 -3925 www.lbfh.com TO: FROM: DATE: FILE NO. SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Jackie Holloman Judy A. T. Dye January 11, 2006 02 -4265 Central Park (a.k.a. La Mariposa, Parcel 31.06 and 31.07) PUD -04 -11 We have reviewed the following plans and information received December 28, 2005: • Justification Statement prepared by Land Design South • Responses to DRC meeting prepared by Land Design South • Site Plan and Details prepared by Land Design South • Landscape Plan and Details prepared by Land Design South • Littoral Tree Plans prepared by Land Design South • Parking Garage Plans and Elevations prepared by Finfrock Design, Inc. • Clubhouse Landscape Plan • Parking Garage Roof Landscape Plan • Typical Unit Landscape Plan and Details • Photometric Plan prepared by Brannon & Gillespie, LLC • Conceptual Plan Paving, Drainage, Water Distribution System and Wastewater Collection System prepared by Mock, Roos & Associates, Inc. • Architectural Plan and Elevations prepared by Scott Blakeslee Disher & Associates We have the following comments: Certification Issues The Traffic Equivalency Analysis prepared by Kimley -Horn & Associates, Inc. dated November 29, 2005 and received December 5, 2005 has been reviewed by City's Traffic Consultant, MTP Group, Inc. and Palm Beach County Traffic Division. The response memorandum from the City's Traffic Consultant, MTP Group, Inc. dated December 12 2005 and response letter from Palm Beach County Traffic Division dated December 14, 2005 have been transmitted under separate cover on December 19, 2005. 1. Not Satisfied. The applicant is proposing +/- 140 feet of lake track shoreline without a lake maintenance easement and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -563, which requires a continuous lake maintenance easement. Please note we remain in support of the City's LDR requirements. Comments #2 through #50 have been previously satisfied or withdrawn. 51. Conditionally Satisfied. Prior to City Council approval, the applicant shall revise sheet 3 of 7 to show the Hood Road ingress lane as 20.5 feet wide (exclusive of P:\PBGMEM0\4265\4265z.doc Central Park (a.k.a. La Mariposa, Parcel 31.06 and 31.07) Page 2 of 10 LBFH File No. 02 -4265 proposed curb and gutter) consistent with the Section A -A Hood Road Entrance detail shown on sheet 6 of 7 and Site Plan sheet SP -2. Currently, the ingress lane is • shown to be 21.5 feet wide. Comments #52 through #53 have been previously satisfied. 54. Not Satisfied. The following waiver requests for Parcel 31.06 are identified in the Justification Statement and Waiver Request Table. Please note that we remain in support of the City's LDR requirements. • The applicant proposes a 22 -foot drive aisle and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -334 (m). • The applicant proposes multi - family residential units and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -159. • The applicant is proposing issuance of the building permits for model homes prior to plat recordation and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -441. • The applicant is proposing a maximum of 2 sign faces for residential entry signage and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -285. • The applicant is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -250 for the proposed preserve area configurations. • The applicant is proposing 6 -foot pedestrian / bike paths and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -231. • The applicant is proposing a 20 -foot LME for all but +/- 140 feet of lake shoreline and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -563. • The applicant is proposing 40 -foot RAS and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -498. • The applicant is proposing lake tracts within upland preserve areas and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -319. • The applicant is proposing '9.5 -foot wide at -grade parking spaces and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -344. • The applicant is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -285 for various proposed signs. Comment #54A and #54B have been previously satisfied. 55. Not Satisfied. The following waiver requests for Parcel 31.07 are identified in the Justification Statement and Waiver Request Table. Please note that we remain in support of the City's LDR requirements. • The applicant proposes a 22 -foot drive aisle and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -334 (m). • The applicant is proposing 0% residential within the second floor of the MXD residential areas and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -157. • The applicant is proposing 27 garage parking spaces in a row without a landscape island and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -315. • The applicant is proposing 9.5 -foot wide surface parking spaces and 9.0 -foot wide garage parking spaces and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78- • 344. P:\PBGMEMO\4265\4265z.doc Central Park (a.k.a. La Mariposa, Parcel 31.06 and 31.07) Page 3 of 10 LBFH File No. 02 -4265 • The applicant is proposing 18.0 -foot long garage parking spaces and is • requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -344. • The applicant is proposing issuance of the building permits for model homes prior to plat recordation and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -441. • The applicant is proposing a maximum of 2 sign faces for residential entry signage and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -285. • The applicant is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -302 for the proposed foundation plantings. • The applicant is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -315 for the proposed parking garage plantings. • The applicant is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -250 for the proposed preserve area configurations. • The applicant is proposing 6 -foot pedestrian / bike paths and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -231. • The applicant is proposing a 20 -foot LME for all but +/- 140 feet of lake shoreline and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -563. • The applicant is proposing 40 -foot RAS and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -498. • The applicant is proposing lake tracts within upland preserve areas and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -319. • The applicant is proposing a 20% increase over required parking and is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -345. • The applicant is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -285 for various proposed signs. • • The applicant is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -319 for the future I- 95 ROW buffer requirements. • Comments #55A, #55B, and #55C have been previously satisfied or withdrawn. 55D. Satisfied. The applicant has confirmed 16 proposed guest parking spaces within Parcel 31.06 and has revised the Site Data Table accordingly. 55F. Conditionally Satisfied. Prior to City Council approval, the applicant shall revise the Photometric Plan to provide foot- candle values within all parking spaces, including all driveways in their entirety. The revised Photometric Plan shall be signed and sealed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Florida. Non - Certification Issues Comments #56 and #62 have been previously satisfied. Conditions of Approval 63. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit (excluding excavation and fill) for the project the plat shall be completed and approved by City Council including, but not limited to all preserves and water management tracts. (City Engineer) P:\PBGMEMO\4265\4265z.doc Central Park (a.k.a. La Mariposa, Parcel 31.06 and 31.07) Page 4 of 10 LBFH File No. 02 -4265 64. Upon PUD approval, the applicant may apply for an excavation and fill permit, which is subject to review and approval by the Growth Management Department., • (City Engineer) 65. The applicant shall provide all necessary construction zone signage and fencing as required by the City Engineer. (City Engineer). 66. All land areas within the project shall have completed the recordation of the plats and the installation of on -site and off -site infrastructure and common landscaping prior to December 31, 2008, subject to the requirements set forth in section 78 -61 of the Land Development Regulations. (City Engineer) 67. The applicant shall comply with the conditions set forth in the Palm Beach County coordinated equivalency memorandum dated December 14, 2004 as follows: (City Engineer) • No development order for more than 269 peak hour trips (60% of the total development plan) is to be issued until the contract is let for construction of Kyoto Gardens Drive extension from .Military Trail to Alternate AIA. (PBC Traffic Division) 67A. The applicant shall comply with the conditions set forth 'in the City of Palm Beach Gardens coordinated equivalency memorandum dated December 12, 2005 as follows: (City Engineer) • a. The proposed 21,600 square -foot furniture store needs to be built as such. Should the land use change, a new traffic study conforming to Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards needs to be submitted and approved. b. Exclusive turn,lanes with proper storage lengths shall be provided as follows: • A northbound left -turn lane on Central Boulevard at the northern access. driveway. • A southbound right -turn lane on Central Boulevard at the northern access driveway. • A southbound right -turn lane on Central Boulevard at the southern access driveway. 68. Comment Withdrawn. 69. Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit (including excavation and fill), the applicant shall provide a cost .estimate for the project; including public infrastructure and all landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the City in order to establish surety. The cost estimate shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and landscape architect registered in the state of Florida. Surety will be based on 110% of the total combined approved cost estimates and shall be posted with the City, prior to the issuance of the first building permit. Surety outstanding for more than one (1) year shall be evaluated and adjusted annually to account for • inflation and fluctuations of construction costs. (City Engineer) P:\PB GMEMO \4265 \4265 z. doc Central Park (a.k.a. La Mariposa, Parcel 31.06 and 31.07) Page 5 of 10 LBFH File No. 02 -4265 • 70. Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the applicant shall provide a cost estimate for the on -site project improvements, not including public infrastructure, landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the City. The cost estimate shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and shall be posted with the City prior to the issuance of the first building permit. (City Engineer) 71. The applicant shall post surety prior to the issuance of a building permit for the model homes for the purposes of demolition and lien protection to remain in effect until the plat is recorded. The amount of the letter of credit shall equal a total of 1/3 of the hard costs of construction of all of the proposed models. No more residential permits shall be issued until the residential portion of the PUD is platted.. (City Engineering) 72. Prior to the issuance of the first residential building permit, except model homes, the master property owners association documents and restrictions shall be furnished by the applicant to the City Attorney for review and approval prior to such documents being recorded in the Public Records of Palm Beach County. (City Attorney) 73. The applicant is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78 -441 to allow for the issuance of building permits for the construction of the building model. While we will remain in support of the City's LDR requirements, if the waiver is • granted we recommend the following condition of approval, "The applicant shall submit surety for demolition and lien protection prior to the issuance of the building permit. Prior to occupancy, the plat shall be approved and construction of a stabilized emergency access drive shall be completed and accepted by the City Engineer and City's Fire Department. The standard dry model conditions of approval should be applied." (City Engineer) 74. The issuance of permits for construction of the dry models prior to platting shall be limited to the model lots as shown on the site plan (City Engineer). 75. No access by the general public will be allowed to a model home until the certificate of completion is issued (City Engineer). 76. The applicant acknowledges that the waiver granted from the requirement for platting prior to building permit is at the applicant's risk and that any potential construction changes to the model homes due to the eventual plat recordation is the sole responsibility of the applicant (Planning and Zoning). 77. Submit a Temporary Model Parking Lot Site Plan, parking space details, pavement marking details, pavement cross - sections, landscape plan, and photometric plan for an administrative review and approval by the City. (City Engineer) 78. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall schedule a pre- permit meeting with city staff. (City Engineer) P:\PBGMEMO\4265\4265z.doc Central Park (a.k.a. La Mariposa, Parcel 31.06 and 31.07) Page 6 of 10 LBFH File No. 02 -4265 79. The applicant shall not undertake construction of any portion of the surface water • management system without first submitting to the City plans, specifications and supporting calculations for review and approval. (City Engineer) 80. The applicant shall copy to the City all permit applications, permits, certifications and approvals. (City Engineer) 81. Applicant shall comply with all Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements, including but not limited to, preparation of a stormwater pollution prevention plan and identification of appropriate Best Management Practices, as generally accepted by the EPA and /or local regulatory agencies, for construction activities, submission of a Notice of Intent to EPA or their designee, implementation of the approved plans, inspection and maintenance of controls during construction, and submission of a Notice of Termination. (City Engineer) 82. The construction, operation and/or maintenance of any elements of the subject project shall not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage of surrounding areas. If at anytime during the development it is determined by the City Engineer that any of the surrounding areas are experiencing negative drainage impacts caused by the project, it shall be the applicant's responsibility to cure said impacts • in a period of time and a manner acceptable to the City Engineer prior to additional construction activities. (City Engineer) 83. Any temporary construction associated with phasing the proposed surface water management system improvements shall be undertaken so as to not impact native vegetation in designated buffer areas, preserve areas and'wetlands. (City Engineer) • 84. Comment Withdrawn. 85. Comment Withdrawn. 86. The applicant shall issue a contract for construction of that portion of the surface s water management system, prior to the issuance of building permits for residential units, such that legal positive drainage., required levels of. service and performance standards for flood protection in accordance with the City's codes and ordinances are achieved so that in the event the project is temporarily delayed or permanently discontinued, the partially constructed system will meet all required surface water management system levels, of service and performance standards. No certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the approved phased portion of the surface water management system has been completed, certified to the City and South Florida Water Management District by the engineer -of- record and determined to be acceptable by the City Engineer and Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District. (City Engineer) P:\PBGMEMO\4265\4265z.doc Central Park (a.k.a. La Mariposa, Parcel 31.06 and 31.07) Page 7 of 10 LBFH File No. 02 -4265 87. No construction/land alteration shall occur until an environmental resource permit • for construction and operation of the surface water management system, or portions thereof, are issued by SFWMD and approved by the City. (City Engineer) 88. The water management system shall be continued to be analyzed and designed using a dynamic analysis acceptable to the City, accounting for piping systems and flood routing in order to establish minimum road, berm and finished floor elevations. These elevations shall be documented in tabular form including sub - basin number and master plan parcel identification on the drainage plans approved by the City. (City Engineer) 89. Comment Withdrawn. 90. Comment Withdrawn. 91. The applicant shall submit any /all build out date extensions to the City of Palm Beach Gardens for review and approval. (City Engineer) 92. The applicant shall submit an updated traffic analysis to Palm Beach County Traffic Division and the City of Palm Beach Gardens for a coordinated review and approval, prior to any future amendments that increase the building area. The analysis shall utilize actual traffic counts generated at the time of the amendment and during the peak season if the amendment is submitted off - season. If requested by the City, the analysis shall include an updated traffic management plan. (City • Engineer) 93. Prior to any future amendments the applicant shall permit the City access to the site in order to perform traffic counts should it be desired. (City Engineer) 94. Upon receipt of this development and continuing through substantial completion of construction, the applicant shall bi- annually provide the City with a status report on all the approved elements of the PUD, including a summary of completed construction and schedule of proposed construction over the remaining life of the development order. (City Engineer) 95. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall conduct a traffic signal warrant study during peak season for the intersection of Central Boulevard and the north entrance drive. The applicant shall update the signal warrant analysis every six months thereafter, until a period of one year after the issuance of the last certificate of occupancy. Should the analysis identify the need for a signal the applicant, successor, or assigns shall pay the cost of its installation and install the signal within six months of the date of the warrant .study. (City Engineer) 96. The applicant shall provide a signed and sealed Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost, for the installation of traffic signalization at the intersection of Central Blvd. and the north entrance drive, for review of the City Engineer. Upon acceptance by • the City Engineer, of the Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost and prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall provide surety based on P:\PBGMEMO\4265\4265z.doc Central Park (a.k.a. La Mariposa, Parcel 31.06 and 31.07) Page 8 of 10 LBFH File No. 02 -4265 110% of the approved Engineer's Opinion of Probable cost for the installation of • the traffic signalization. (City Engineer) 97. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or within six (6) months of the issuance of the Development Order, whichever comes first, the applicant shall enter into a Public Facility Agreement (PFA) with Palm Beach County for funding of the roadway improvements in a form acceptable to the County Engineer for all non - assured construction. (City Engineer) 98. The County traffic concurrency approval is subject to the Project Aggregation Rules set forth in the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. (City Engineer) 99. Comment Withdrawn. No more than 124 net new external daily trips until the contract is let for the widening of Hood Road from Central Blvd. to Military Trail to a four lane divided cross section. (City Engineer). The Hood Road improvements are currently under construction. 100. Comment Withdrawn. No more than 931 net new external daily trips until the contract is let for the widening of Hood Road from Military Trail to Alternate AlA to a four lane divided cross section. (City Engineer). The Hood Road improvements are currently under construction. 101. Comment Withdrawn. • Non - Certification Issues Should the applicant seek to construct a Temporary Sales Center and Temporary Construction Center prior to construction plan approval and plat recordation of the entirety of Parcel 31.06 and 31.07, the following non - certification issues shall be applicable and required to be approved prior to issuance of the first land alteration permit for said facilities. 102. The applicant shall indicate the duration of use of the Temporary Sales Center and Temporary Construction Center. 103. The applicant shall provide a handicap accessible route to the Temporary Sales Center and Temporary Construction Center meeting all applicable local, regional, state, and federal accessibility guidelines and regulations. 104. The applicant shall add a note to the Temporary Sales Center and Temporary Construction Center plans indicating, "All handicap accessible ramps shall meet all applicable local, regional, state, and federal accessibility guidelines and regulations. Any modifications shall be approved by the engineer -of- record." 105. The applicant shall submit a signed and sealed Drainage Statement for the Temporary Sales Center and Temporary Construction Center for City review and approval. 106. Prior to issuance of the first land alteration permit, the applicant shall submit P:\PBGMEMO \4265 \4265z.doc . ,., RIM Central Park (a.k.a. La Mariposa, Parcel 31.06 and 31.07) Page 9 of 10 LBFH File No. 02 -4265 signed and sealed construction plans for the Temporary Sales Center and • Temporary Construction Center (paving /grading /drainage and water /sewer) and all pertinent calculations for City review and approval. 107. The applicant shall submit a signed and sealed Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan demonstrating how the Temporary Sales Center and Temporary Construction Center will drain, through the use of flow arrows and illustrated high/low points. 108. The applicant shall indicate how water quality treatment is provided for the Temporary Sales Center and Temporary Construction Center prior to discharge, and submit signed and sealed water quality and surface water management calculations for City review and approval. The applicant shall provide the design storm frequency elevations in accordance with LDR Section 78 -523, the January 2003 FDOT Drainage Manual, and the SFWMD Environmental Resource Permit Information Manual, Volume N. 109. The applicant shall submit signed and sealed hydraulic calculations for the Temporary Sales Center and Temporary Construction Center for City review and approval. The applicant shall provide pipe- sizing calculations, including minimum velocity and freeboard requirements in accordance with LDR Section 78 -524 and 78- 525(b) and the January 2003 FDOT Drainage Manual. 110. The applicant shall submit signed and sealed Photometric Plans for the Temporary Sales Center and Temporary Construction Center for City review and approval • meeting all applicable requirements of LDR Section 78 -182. 111. The applicant shall submit Landscape Plans for the Temporary Sales Center and Temporary Construction Center for City review and approval. 112. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit for the Temporary Sales Center and Temporary Construction Center, the applicant shall provide surety for public infrastructure and all landscaping and irrigation costs. The required surety shall be, based on signed and sealed cost estimates for the Temporary Sales Center and Temporary Construction Center submitted by the applicant for City review and approval. Surety will be based on 110% of the total combined approved cost estimates and shall be posted with the City prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit. 113. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit for the Temporary Sales Center and Temporary Construction Center, the applicant shall provide a cost estimate for the on -site project improvements, not including public infrastructure, landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the City. The cost estimates shall be signed and sealed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Florida and shall be posted with the City prior to the issuance of the first building permit. 114. Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit for the Temporary Sales • Center and Temporary Construction Center, the applicant shall provide a copy of the following approved permits, as applicable: P:\PBGMEMO \4265 \4265z.doc 4. Central Park (a.k.a. La Mariposa, Parcel 31.06 and 31.07) Page 10 of 10 LBFH File No. 02 -4265 • a. SFWMD b. NPBCID c. PBC d. FDOT e. SUA/PBC Health Department/FDEP f. NPDES C7 • The applicant is requested to return a copy of our comments with the applicant's acknowledgement of each comment and the response. Compliance will expedite the subsequent review. JATD /tj cc: Talal Benothman - PBG fl (tbenoth.man��pb ay corn) James S. Gielda — EB Developers, Inc. (jgieldaL&ebdevelopers.com) Jennifer Morton — Land Design South (jmortonna,landdesignsouth.com) Neil. J. Condy, P.E. — Mock, Roos & Associates, Inc. (neil . condy@mockroo s. com) P:\PBGMEMO\4265\4265z.doc • Memo to File _ From: Ross Gilmore, Forestry Technician Subject: SP -04 -05 — Central Park (FKA/La Mariposa, Parcels 31.06/.07) Date: January 9, 2006 I have reviewed the Land Development Regulations for the above- referenced application and provide the following comments: In accordance with Section 78 -231 (f) (1) a. of the LDR, the parkway requirements for Hood Road and Central Boulevard are as follows: a 11 foot wide strip for tree canopy adjacent to the road right -of -way; followed by a 6 foot wide meandering path; followed by a 10 foot wide strip for tree canopy; followed by a 63 foot wide corridor of native vegetation or enhanced landscape area. I believe the parkway concept for Hood Road and Central Boulevard has been incorrectly interpreted as described in the project narrative and as shown on the plan. Please review the parkway requirements and update the site plan and landscape plan accordingly or ask for a waiver from this code requirement. Satisfied. • 2. According to Seacoast Utility Authority, the parking garage may not meet the required setback from the 24" transmission main. Seacoast requires the building to be setback 15' from edge of pipe. Seacoast has stated that the transmission main is located two feet from the eastern edge of the easement. Please update the site plan and landscape plan accordingly. Satisfied. In accordance with Section 78 -305 of the LDR, landscape plans should clearly delineate and key landscape areas, landscape materials, and square footage of open space and impervious areas. The applicant shall clarify what areas were used in the calculation of required open space. Please provide documentation that supports the open space requirements for the property in CAD format on CD ROM. The CAD file will contain the DWG, DXF; DGN file extensions in version 2004 or earlier. The CAD files shall contain drawings of the property boundary, impervious /pervious areas, and areas designated as open space. The drawings shall be defined as closed polygons and accurately reflect scale, area, and include text and annotation clearly labeled and legible. Satisfied. 4. In accordance with Section 78 -154 (g) (11) a. of the LDR, the open space requirement for residential areas shall be 40 percent of the gross land area. The open space requirement may be reduced to a minimum of 35 percent by city council only if at least 50 percent of the required open space consists of environmentally sensitive preserve areas or common open space. Please update • the site data tables on pages SP -1 and SP -2 to reflect that the minimum required • open space for the residential area is 40 percent. Satisfied. 5. In accordance with Section 78 -344 of the LDR, the reduction in parking space dimensions requires additional open space at a ratio of 1.5 square feet for each square feet of paved parking area that is reduced. The additional open space shall be installed within the paved portions of the parking area. Please update the site plan and landscape plan to show the location of additional open space within the parking area. Withdrawn. 6. Please provide detailed information showing how the minimum required landscape points were calculated for Parcel 31.06 and Parcel 31.07. Satisfied. 7. In accordance with Section 78 -313 of the LDR, a minimum of 75 percent of tree, shrub, and ground cover species shall be from the City's Preferred Species List. Please update the landscape plan to ensure compliance with this requirement. Satisfied. 8. In accordance with Section 78 -313 of the LDR, not more than 40 percent of the total landscape area shall be covered by sod or grass in a nonresidential development. Please provide documentation showing the amount of area covered by sod or grass within Parcel 31.07. Satisfied. • 9. In accordance with Section 78 -306 of the LDR, all locations for proposed utilities, easements, and light fixtures shall be shown on the landscape plan as to prevent possible conflicts. The applicant shall be aware that any changes to the landscape plan due to the location of utilities will require City Council approval. Please update the landscape plan to clearly label and show location of berms, lift stations, ground- mounted utility equipment, backflow preventers, ground - mounted air conditioning units, etc. along with the required screening of each item. Satisfied. Prior to land alteration the applicant shall submit the FP &L and SUA approved landscape plans for review and approval by the City. Major changes to the landscape plan may be determined by the Growth Management Administrator to be re- reviewed and approved by the City Council. 10. In accordance with Section 78- 320(a) (4) c. of the LDR, nonresidential buildings shall have at least one shade tree or palm cluster installed for each 30 linear feet, or fraction thereof, of facade width. Trees and palms shall be of an installed size relating to the height of the adjacent wall or facade, as indicated in Table 30. Please update the site plan and landscape plan accordingly. Satisfied. 11. In accordance with Section 78 -320 of the LDR, there shall be foundation landscaping installed within ten feet of all nonresidential buildings and structures. The foundation planting area for a building of two or more stories • shall be not less than 30 percent of the height of the adjacent wall. Please update 40 the site plan and landscape plan accordingly. Satisfied. 12. In accordance with. Section 78 -315 (g) of the LDR, multilevel parking garages shall have planters installed to permit the installation of trees on the top level of the structure. Please update the landscape plan accordingly or ask for a waiver. Not Satisfied. Staff remains in support of the LDR requirement and does not support the requested waiver. Prior to the scheduling of City Council, the applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to include the installation of planters to permit the installation of trees on the top level of the parking garage. At a minimum one planter with tree shall be installed for every nine parking spaces located in a row, similar to what is required for normal surface parking. 13. In accordance with Section 78 -344 of the LDR, structured parking facilities require adequate screening and buffering from adjacent uses. Please update the landscape plan to increase the amount of landscape material surrounding the parking garage. Conditionally Satisfied. Prior to the scheduling of City Council, the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to include the installation of nine palms along the west facade of the parking garage meeting the minimum height requirement of 22 28 feet in overall height as outlined in Section 78- 320(a) (4) c. of the LDR. • 14. The future right -of way for the right turn lane off Central Boulevard is in conflict with the required 20 foot wide lake maintenance easement. Please update the site plan and landscape plan to provide an unencumbered 20 foot wide lake maintenance easement. Satisfied. 15. In accordance with Section 78 -250 of the LDR, a minimum 15 -foot upland buffer, composed of native vegetation, shall be preserved or established around wetland areas landward from the edge of the wetland in all places. The buffer shall average 25 feet in width from the landward edge of the wetland. The .11 acre wetland preserve located east of building number 12 has a minimum of three easements which encumber the required buffer. Please update the site plan and landscape plan to meet code requirements. Satisfied. 16. In accordance with Section 78 -330 of the LDR, prior to land clearing or construction, the developer shall erect and maintain barriers to protect preserve areas. Please indicate the type of protection on the landscape plan for clarification. Satisfied. 17. In accordance with Section 78 -324 of the LDR, please provide plans for the required roadway beautification of Central Boulevard and Hood Road. The applicant shall provide plans for the road shoulder and center island medians of Central Boulevard consistent with the Old Palm landscaping south of the I -95 flyover. Staff does not believe the applicant can establish the proposed • landscaping and sidewalk south of the southern entrance. The proposed pedestrian pathway should connect with the existing sidewalk at the bottom of the approach ramp. The road shoulder adjacent to the flyover shall be planted with Sabal palms. The applicant shall provide landscape plans for the road shoulder and center island median of Hood Road consistent with the design used by Evergrene PCD. Satisfied. 18. I anticipate a condition of approval that would require the applicant to remove all prohibited and invasive non - native plants from the preserve areas within six months from the date of approval. Once all removal work has been completed, the City Forester may require the installation of native material within preserve areas to effectively screen the site from view of Central Boulevard and Hood Rood. Satisfied. 19. The site was the scene of a recent wildfire of which the extent of damage is unknown. During a recent site visit I observed extensive mortality to Slash pines within the proposed preserve areas. Because of this, I recommend the applicant submits a new environmental assessment of the proposed preserve areas. Satisfied. 20. The applicant shall provide cross- sections of the proposed parkway easements adjacent to Hood Road and Central Boulevard. The drawings shall show the meandering sidewalk, landscaping, and location of berm within the 55 foot wide • berm easement. Satisfied. 21. The required 15 feet wide perimeter buffer does not extend the full length of the west parcel boundary due to the proposed 40 feet wide FPL easement located in the northeast corner of the property. The applicant has proposed a 10 feet wide landscape buffer adjacent to the site ingress /egress from Hood Road. This buffer is located along the east side of the easement adjacent to the proposed road. The applicant proposes to plant shrubs and ground cover within the buffer. Section 78 -319 requires the installation of trees within perimeter buffers at a maximum spacing of 60 feet. I recommend the addition of trees or palms in the proposed buffer. Satisfied. 22. In accordance with Section 78 -319 of the LDR, a minimum landscape buffer of at least 20 feet in depth shall be required on lands located adjacent to public street rights -of -way that are 100 feet wide or greater. The right -of -way for Central Boulevard is 120 feet wide. Areas that are prohibited from within required perimeter buffers include lake maintenance easements. The proposed plan has two lake maintenance easements within the Central Boulevard buffer., The applicant shall request a waiver to allow the two lake maintenance easements to be located within the required perimeter buffer adjacent to Central Boulevard. To compensate for this waiver, I recommend the applicant increase the height of the cypress trees proposed for installation within the littoral • planting zones adjacent to. Central Boulevard to an overall height of 12 — 18 I feet. The installation of trees meeting this height will help to provide the screening of the site normally obtained by the required perimeter buffer. Trees shall be planted with staggered heights to create the look of a natural setting. Conditionally Satisfied based on the proposed text amendment. 23. The applicant shall provide a cross - section of the 1.56 acre lake tract. The plan proposes to surround the lake with a bulkhead. I am concerned for the safety of people, children, and animals that may accidentally fall into and become trapped due to the height of the proposed wall. The cross - section shall depict how the applicant proposes to access the lake for maintenance or in the event of an emergency. A cross - section shall also be provided that shows the littoral planting zones and elevation changes. Satisfied. 24. The applicant proposes to utilize several re- positionable planters within the commercial portion of the development. These planters shall not count toward required foundation plantings nor shall the plant material count toward the required landscape points for the site. Satisfied. 25. The applicant shall amend the table titled Plant Schedule to include two additional columns. The first column shall reflect points assigned to each species. The second shall show total points for each species (assigned points x quantity). The applicant shall also provide justification for points assigned to specimen trees, palms, and plants. Not Satisfied. • 26. In accordance with Section 78 -681 (b) (6) f. of the LDR, the area contained in public or private street rights -of -way is not considered as open space and receives no credit toward complying with open space requirements. Please revise the acreage shown for the amount of open space provided to exclude those areas located within street rights -of -way. Conditionally Satisfied. The applicant shall work with the City Forester to revise the CAD files to document the amount of open space provided for the entire site. 27. In accordance with Section 78 -681 (b) (1) a. of the LDR, if a recreation facility is located or concentrated in a single or localized section of a PUD or other development, and less than 30 percent of the residential dwelling units abut the facility, only 50 percent of the area contained in the facility may count toward complying with open space requirements. I believe that the CAD drawings indicate 100 percent of the area has been counted toward complving with open space requirem' ents. Please revise the acreage shown for the amount of open space provided to only include 50 percent of the recreation area facility. Conditionally Satisfied. Upon further review by staff, this code requires the applicant to demonstrate open space requirements can be met while using only 50 percent of the recreation area facility. Once required open space is met, the applicant can show 100 percent of the area as open space provided. Prior to the scheduling of City Council the applicant shall demonstrate required open space can be met counting only 50 percent of the recreation • area facility. Upon this criteria being met, the site data table shall be amended to include the entire recreation area as open space provided. • 28. In accordance with Section 78 -681 (b) (2) c. of the LDR, manmade water bodies and canals shall not account for more than 50 percent of the required open space in a development. The acreage of the proposed lake tracts account for more than 50 percent of the required open space. The applicant shall request a waiver from this code requirement. Conditionally Satisfied. Upon further review by staff, this code requires the applicant to demonstrate open space requirements can be met while using only 50 percent of the manmade water bodies. Once required open space is met, the applicant can show 100 percent of the area as open space provided. Prior to the scheduling of City Council the applicant shall demonstrate required open space can be met counting only 50 percent of the manmade water bodies. Upon this criteria being met, the site data table shall be amended to include all the manmade water bodies as open space provided. 29. In accordance with Section 78 -285 of the LDR, the landscape area for the front and sides of a ground sign shall not be less than the height of the sign. The rear landscape area shall be a minimum width of three feet. Several of the proposed sign locations do not allow for the minimum landscape area. Please revise the site plan and landscape plan or ask for a waiver for the reduction of landscape area for the proposed signs. Satisfied. 30. The applicant shall be put on notice that staff's experience has shown projects • which propose to provide the exact amount of required preserve acreage will not meet this requirement when the construction phase is completed. If this occurs the applicant shall return to City Council for approval. Satisfied. 31. The applicant has requested a waiver from Section 78 -319 (a) (2). This waiver is not necessary as the proposed text amendment will resolve this issue. 32. The applicant has requested a waiver from Section 78 -319 (a) (3). This waiver is not necessary as the proposed preserve will serve as the required buffer. Satisfied. 33. The applicant shall install a meandering sidewalk with low groundcover adjacent to Central Boulevard between the two site entrances. The design of the sidewalk and landscaping shall be consistent with that proposed from Hood Road to the northern site entrance. Not Satisfied. Prior to the scheduling of City Council, the applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to include the installation of the meandering sidewalk with low groundcover. The sidewalk shall be built on a stabilized subsurface engineered to withstand the appropriate equipment traffic. Also, please understand that additional information may be requested, and staff • may have additional comments as the review process continues. 4 Y 4% Seacoast Utility Authority OECUTIVE OFFICE: January 9, 2006 VIA FAX 799 -4281 Ms. Jackie Holloman Planning & Zoning Division City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 North Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 RE: Central Park (La Mariposa) Dear Ms, Holloman: Mailing Address: P.O. Box 109602 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 -9602 We are in receipt of your transmittal dated December 22, 2005 concerning the referenced project and offer the following comments. 1. The applicant needs to revise the site plan, landscape plans and conceptual engineering plans to properly depict street light placement in the south residential portion of the project. The current submittal shows street lights located on top of other infrastructure in numerous locations in this isarea. 2.. The applicant needs to adjust the location of the proposed light poles along Hood Road to be clear of the 10 foot SUA easement. Please call if you require additional information. Sincerely, SEACOAST UTILITY THORITY F Bruce Gregg Director of Operations dp cc: R. Bishop J. Callaghan J. Dye J. Lance CI1Y OF PALM. BCH GDNS 0 JAN 12 200 PLANNING & ZONING DIV 4200 Hood Road, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 -2198 Phone: Customer Service (561) 627 -2920 / Executive Office (561) 627 -2900 / Fax (561) 624 -2839 CJ Inter - Office Memorandum To Jackie Holloman From: Jules Barone Ref: PUD - 04 -11- Central Park Resubmittal Date: December 7, 2005 The Police Department has reviewed the resubmitted plans for Petition PUD -04 -11 Central Park. The Police Departartment takes issue with the Petitioner's position on CPTED principles within the commercial core of the project. The Petitioner is seeking a waiver from LDR Section 78 -157(0 which requires a percentage of total square footage in the neighborhood • commercial area for residential units. The concern is not the waiver request but with application of CPTED principles within the commercial core. 2) The design of the parking garage structure indicates metal screening will be used for the East and West elevations. The concern is the design reduces visibility of people, vehicles and intruders within the structure thus increasing the opportunity for crime. CC: Chief S. Stepp Files • CITY OF PALM GARDENS 10500N. MILITARY TRAIL PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410 -4698 FIRE RESCUE DEPARTMENT ; MEMORANDUM TO: Jackie Holloman, Planner DATE: December 7; 2005 APPROVED: FROM: Scott Fetterman, Deputy Chief RE: PUD- 04 -11: Parcels 31.06 and 31.07 (Central Park) Fire Rescue has reviewed the resubmittal revisions for the above referenced PUD petition and has no outstanding comments or concerns: • Fire Rescue continues to have a concern with the setback of the town . homes to the preserve. Fire continues to recommends a setback of at least 20'. (SATISFIED) • The applicant needs to verify that the bridge connecting the parking garage to the buildings will provide a required clearance of at least 13' -6 ". (SATISFIED) • Fire hydrant locations are difficult to see on the proposed engineering plan but appear to conflict with light poles and landscaping. The Fire Code requires a minimum clearance of T -6" to the front and sides of a fire hydrant and a 4' clearance to the rear. (SATISFIED) Thank you for your assistance and consideration in this matter. Please contact me if you have any questions. Ll 0 N Page 1 of 1 Jackie Holloman From: Melissa Prindiville Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 4:11 PM To: Jackie Holloman Subject: Central Park Sign Package. Jackie, staff has reviewed the Sign Package for Central Parb and we have the following comments: Page A4 - Suite Identity Number color shall be contrasting with bachground, so as to be clearly visible. Page A4 - Building Identity Numbers shall be applied to fascia on both ends of the building. Page A6 - Suite Identity Number color shall be contrasting with background, so as to be clearly visible. Page A6 - Building Identity Numbers shall be applied to fascia on both ends of the building. Page 4 - Shops address range shall be included. Page F1- There is no need for option B all Unit Identity Numbers shall be illuminated. Feel free to contact me with any questions. Melissa Prindiville GIS Manager Palm Beach Gardens mprindiville @pbgfl.com (561)799 -4278 12/7/2005 • • Y K 4 iy q i; i� i[ i5 ip is ii f i is q i€ it �DACmrm <0 u'mSOO oD wvomm �DJopm TmK oDa)= w�N�j o wOo��� mZO =�� m bDDC, cn� D m (Am m co r�Z CA -i rv0� w�iW7O V) rn�DOn �n L, -M�t1 ��Cci)D o�n �D M;K CKO --i mzm �D�pm OD?'Om� r O T�� DW r-� D� mmmnzZ D0 C cn ��� C) m� �i�7 D DOCC) r�C(A 2CANn ?m ; D 0�QD T Mm �� w�Z 8 a 6 o-,�4z. o n (D v-0.RL . - �,��o -u r (Iw a) fn N (d m , a ° C ° -c C-l" og o � C - CD a I CL CD a m_ (li Z 3� TOP 0 �rr<rr f7D V A W O '.� rn m CT Y z ;o ,, ,, cf) (1) m m Zr m m �o co T -V -i CO (D 7 Z CD g g ix W W 0 li m f� ;u CD w Cn T T `h A (n O f =z o INV N z Z Cn 12I-NNi X m O i r- 0 0 D z D (Ti$ CAT 0) v (nSCligm �) nViOz (T$ A7C rnC1T --� NXAp °'O°'m MCP CANCnD °'0CoC)z1 yNDD °) co UCD V m0 a'OmCo m ��mz v m�coj�z _W A�mr^ to c�iDWZ <�,zm=0= ��mn0� 4°vatmon �DACmrm <0 u'mSOO oD wvomm �DJopm TmK oDa)= w�N�j o wOo��� mZO =�� m bDDC, cn� D m (Am m co r�Z CA -i rv0� w�iW7O V) rn�DOn �n L, -M�t1 ��Cci)D o�n �D M;K CKO --i mzm �D�pm OD?'Om� r O T�� DW r-� D� mmmnzZ D0 C cn ��� C) m� �i�7 D DOCC) r�C(A 2CANn ?m ; D 0�QD T Mm �� w�Z �v_n = O Z ?7CD r Oo w OS O =M A n w� m Z WrmZ W wm �D0 �Di�O a rn Cl) < a m -n1 m m WC)C A� o o� ��" jC> 90 � m T. v z m� � O C D O p m N CA C W m m CA � c �m m Q m D m � n m T m N m m �= N � 8 O I lk N 7 CD C2 CD CL CA m 0 CD CD 0 CD w 0 V CD v n w Q CD Cn Q. w C) m z D r D 0 0 0 ' �o Imo z0 V1 0 � m ji. W � m f B! A a 9 .Ili kii . J K)m x D C '0 D — — — — - NOO'4M'E �y f s m 3 D € ° i i� our o m 69 D D -� m� %� g� f y D n m tOAm n•i`���� ,nt as 66 N as RAI II A I w rn� �'� � �mm° G�° y s w 4 3l1 L1 1 �y f s m 3 D € ° i i� our o m 69 D D -� m� %� g� f y D n m tOAm n•i`���� ,nt as 66 N as �f Lam - i n ON 6- 6 L I N C I 7 i 06- N / 3l1 L1 1 �� ._._._._._._ ...... _._ _._._ _. _.- _._.J �f Lam - i n ON 6- 6 L I N C I 7 i 06- N C -Z 3= 'D nm _ m J m m ax I y I _N a3 z >m 1 n I O � I D �T >m 1x I m o o c� H � I m£ Age I �o N �F �I 8 � I A I .I f : =pu g' N sa � DIa I D m N z An lwm m 1 a or" =9 £ m z BARD 2 < ARA A c c: ;0 I c: c om �t f Ft �'o H m N y N s a m x o m�° a" g� °o m p m gg e , m a Z £ ° f �3 I CN�� D H C �Ao r g m D tl q Q9 r o9 �S�AZ $ Z �i q; 2 m - = nto m ' � i C cn e m v tl 0 Z 11r��yg�/pyq�/� N I � �TIJ t°JIY�Y�B/���rcr9 p�tnO�m�� r D O mT yvm S 74 Qmm ma„rmAmr z"ms�oro- Z m N m; OQGP ✓ -+11CU mOmy SS �Jy DASD oC). >o > m O 2 A9]ICCC A��'0 '1 -i�AmA y(/1 yin �11'pO n9 a n u n nmm� Dm �Zjj OrrC mZ- Zrm�22 yyyp D9SO�OCOr yr yAIyr O S =m IAIgqm_m Am VrVV xAOv0000 O 0 '>8181yA IT 0 �y App RIlmQA(((III��r -{ y <yCFiyyi n 9n ➢rrZ mCJCC��Z pDp NmANN9 msZ mpA9AD0 m�� O 00 O 00;12 �vQCaC 9005 S5 m�'� °CV9m -iC -IC CF r�00((rr1� CL�O�x �Q� mm O Q T T Z O m m O m OOCj D31Sy11ymp Z �I yr Om Z 00 A D� A C <(�vy r CmRy SLOOmrCOv O -ZZZ O °- OOOr.r a02 mNO2 mm O2 Ommy mg -Z"ZOp O V 6 DC O -9 Qm Cm S2 Z�IQ V A ]r ;N OHO_ 9ZDDy Ty m + y T r O 92CDU(/i pm �m lam O00 D -i>y�m 818181. tiY ��m OT j A yO mL1y2 Q o y o c4� O D y aS� 8 r5 r5m c �r coo ci rn °m. 5 ��> OZ D 'i m yy m y y m O -fir mmp =oo O z ;O y� vim y 3 8 1�nn Oy O 819 �'�"Fm ��m xr Qa mQVVV Ommm n D� rTQ$ A �r��� i T m O O < m��OO 4 m O�m!sZr^A QO ➢� yDrrrAQmy �J �mQ�NC�]1T� Ipil "yyT =D IAi1pAC D SIG Z N�T1m n 00 O ]Jm m A�Pnm Zi OA Arm Pup #m Am m0 yyyy NO y 000 C C O 33II Z D z 2 OD b� pQ <O G)mm ;o. yy OmCC�m ¢ m m D CmuO f/r y�y m�Om �mSS��ZOz000 yC- yymmmmyy SI #C C #rC Si rr0 N Z A A C 2 Z �] OD_ br Dr S- yyZZ D O O 1°➢ m310A3 $up'[y� y'm<<yr2ti Op tiTm�A S., C mNy01)ZSTinR91-V -1 mmm ySle O IZ _O 6 Fj m O Z_Y Z pmD OOQ m m m D O OyZ HI 20 Dm 2N pm ZOO S- Q ym (] ym F� m OiT y mmR mm mOmDR1 �m ZmZ 03131 SIC �9nap; Q. O Or.. Q mTOr OCm D� O O myy ZZ O D Ox2�'D ZD Dy yy CHHs zfim OD 03120O O ((r�11*Arn m mAA AA an 3([[1 COCyy}1 Z O O ; < N Q T Sm N~ m T N CL Dm 3oT AS➢ ._9D 2PFR A Iri1i31 '°< Z ti9Z Sr ymN y F Fi S�«GpD tl�.D1 m�j m m CTi_YIA O Lj4Cm D D H ti V Z A U Di Q $ O D Ls D 9-1 yy T-IZ Z rr. imm'p bj pD mmm Y �mcyW�m �T �m ZZ m m m p m Om < O < -mm �F m O ZC O m n A 9m 9 nmm n D- map -O DD �ytty Gry _ {j p p y @, p ZZD _ X D N m m D mZi �Z CAO mi yyym �➢r ym ,� rmlD Ol'1 4'1m FJCZr11�Z ¢S AN DZS'AD 8190➢ m Ct_ 'WS xIO ; AAR8 )�Dm -i�� •q JQl T6 kgAA .�R- N AH POT tr s mph m X81y vv m I O TO F DDS 5 DO �yD �Omom mpmDOOAQ fires FrtI O X110 mt➢l mm .m}Gx(Z yyp��ii11 2 <m mppymj (3m�1lQOD�ymy g� O oQ Irl C C m F Z m m m iN�v 9 0 0� <� �mm 2 C 0 fi Dm�D m f #_m,rlr Dm N m 3 D -r Sl -�,y2 y 3�� ..DllDll X11 r �mn Do m m $ m 2 �yT y2���TT1 y(11m. ylm/1 N you ~D O ^m (D1 C 0�1t y mGGIIy TTmQ< Jc D SS y bN �1Ap "`O DQ O� pi rO�NS �� 1A� �In �.r �` SI f�� O JnSD Y1y ^-i T--rD (A11nO = <�A Pmm G) N m x Zm $ a5 .+- O ZOZ �m mu m a�`A (pT76 �TYn sD00 D Dp C ny� o A Z •m Om Amm 4CCCyCCCy1 Zm Nnr�y T mmy�m �3mn1^ ��tDm1� m� m pO CZ rr Oy $ y ° C ° y �� DrOm g Q �y r0g-ymy mfrlm Am0 �9yS,I� D �yAm �- O }Z5 C y m OOO S�pIO my L'0 ,N� rtmr ;pjZf ZF O- O C C y Z r 8181 p 9 Z > mSJO Ny�y � �m 09Q mC3 y SyA r00 o m D 2 m Z m 6 [mrn « O N� ;m Nr r9titi3 <A Q? N A31 8 y� 80 VQy g n€jNDxiliS _ ®SPY\! ® ©; p A Im 7.1 4'J m n Z m � Q l� QQ a� yo_r��� ion n B% �y 8 °➢ ° Amyr•'DOyc��a¢ m 4 �mg y� or$ m N <xi x 4 € z °$po�JsC��OimJm 5 p y �yy qt Dyey �(-''� o Z3 sz S- °d 8QmrRlm ;;m ; ;cy� !M1 m n Sy �z52 DD m Z ;Gi'f ITI S9'j p rrli Q3AAD�=pym1C SQ LZ O m ;i� inm TOT OOADmmO jz$�ag V N lJ O ;r,� S m A O�(!I� Z-1 bbb yr mZi �Zn = p rn ^ -myi Z�y�tmil s u�r.l� .CDI p r,� +�it0 4 .0 0 (�Ij z 1'I rDyir m OO me rOZm -jbs Ai -ml A9m BSI Cf u m m�ivwo:. �e� ��'°', 1n m0 C mN O N�yy �LL r 9 8 cbF �m m r TD �sn1m �� 'm $'13'm a $H yWN ^S�u f3 a m ; vm � o Fo �vv vo vvvv v vv c➢i�.c➢i. n�,c➢iK a ��nSDi���� � �my,�i pQc mc- p;cpc`:�t� p LAN D e CENTRAL PARK m rA DESIGN N PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS m PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA SOUTH Landscape Archdecture /i_and Planning /Environmental Consulting / m 1 � o m° e�1E m N1RAL �1 3 C Bp C -Z 3= 'D nm _ m J m m ax I y I _N a3 z >m 1 n I O � I D �T >m 1x I m o o c� H � I m£ Age I �o N �F �I 8 � I A I .I f : =pu g' N sa � DIa I D m N z An lwm m 1 a or" =9 £ m z BARD 2 < ARA A c c: ;0 I c: c om �t f Ft �'o H m N y N s a m x o m�° a" g� °o m p m gg e , m a Z £ ° f �3 I CN�� D H C �Ao r g m D tl q Q9 r o9 �S�AZ $ Z �i q; 2 m - = nto m ' � i C cn e m v tl 0 Z 11r��yg�/pyq�/� N I � �TIJ t°JIY�Y�B/���rcr9 p�tnO�m�� r D O mT yvm S 74 Qmm ma„rmAmr z"ms�oro- Z m N m; OQGP ✓ -+11CU mOmy SS �Jy DASD oC). >o > m O 2 A9]ICCC A��'0 '1 -i�AmA y(/1 yin �11'pO n9 a n u n nmm� Dm �Zjj OrrC mZ- Zrm�22 yyyp D9SO�OCOr yr yAIyr O S =m IAIgqm_m Am VrVV xAOv0000 O 0 '>8181yA IT 0 �y App RIlmQA(((III��r -{ y <yCFiyyi n 9n ➢rrZ mCJCC��Z pDp NmANN9 msZ mpA9AD0 m�� O 00 O 00;12 �vQCaC 9005 S5 m�'� °CV9m -iC -IC CF r�00((rr1� CL�O�x �Q� mm O Q T T Z O m m O m OOCj D31Sy11ymp Z �I yr Om Z 00 A D� A C <(�vy r CmRy SLOOmrCOv O -ZZZ O °- OOOr.r a02 mNO2 mm O2 Ommy mg -Z"ZOp O V 6 DC O -9 Qm Cm S2 Z�IQ V A ]r ;N OHO_ 9ZDDy Ty m + y T r O 92CDU(/i pm �m lam O00 D -i>y�m 818181. tiY ��m OT j A yO mL1y2 Q o y o c4� O D y aS� 8 r5 r5m c �r coo ci rn °m. 5 ��> OZ D 'i m yy m y y m O -fir mmp =oo O z ;O y� vim y 3 8 1�nn Oy O 819 �'�"Fm ��m xr Qa mQVVV Ommm n D� rTQ$ A �r��� i T m O O < m��OO 4 m O�m!sZr^A QO ➢� yDrrrAQmy �J �mQ�NC�]1T� Ipil "yyT =D IAi1pAC D SIG Z N�T1m n 00 O ]Jm m A�Pnm Zi OA Arm Pup #m Am m0 yyyy NO y 000 C C O 33II Z D z 2 OD b� pQ <O G)mm ;o. yy OmCC�m ¢ m m D CmuO f/r y�y m�Om �mSS��ZOz000 yC- yymmmmyy SI #C C #rC Si rr0 N Z A A C 2 Z �] OD_ br Dr S- yyZZ D O O 1°➢ m310A3 $up'[y� y'm<<yr2ti Op tiTm�A S., C mNy01)ZSTinR91-V -1 mmm ySle O IZ _O 6 Fj m O Z_Y Z pmD OOQ m m m D O OyZ HI 20 Dm 2N pm ZOO S- Q ym (] ym F� m OiT y mmR mm mOmDR1 �m ZmZ 03131 SIC �9nap; Q. O Or.. Q mTOr OCm D� O O myy ZZ O D Ox2�'D ZD Dy yy CHHs zfim OD 03120O O ((r�11*Arn m mAA AA an 3([[1 COCyy}1 Z O O ; < N Q T Sm N~ m T N CL Dm 3oT AS➢ ._9D 2PFR A Iri1i31 '°< Z ti9Z Sr ymN y F Fi S�«GpD tl�.D1 m�j m m CTi_YIA O Lj4Cm D D H ti V Z A U Di Q $ O D Ls D 9-1 yy T-IZ Z rr. imm'p bj pD mmm Y �mcyW�m �T �m ZZ m m m p m Om < O < -mm �F m O ZC O m n A 9m 9 nmm n D- map -O DD �ytty Gry _ {j p p y @, p ZZD _ X D N m m D mZi �Z CAO mi yyym �➢r ym ,� rmlD Ol'1 4'1m FJCZr11�Z ¢S AN DZS'AD 8190➢ m Ct_ 'WS xIO ; AAR8 )�Dm -i�� •q JQl T6 kgAA .�R- N AH POT tr s mph m X81y vv m I O TO F DDS 5 DO �yD �Omom mpmDOOAQ fires FrtI O X110 mt➢l mm .m}Gx(Z yyp��ii11 2 <m mppymj (3m�1lQOD�ymy g� O oQ Irl C C m F Z m m m iN�v 9 0 0� <� �mm 2 C 0 fi Dm�D m f #_m,rlr Dm N m 3 D -r Sl -�,y2 y 3�� ..DllDll X11 r �mn Do m m $ m 2 �yT y2���TT1 y(11m. ylm/1 N you ~D O ^m (D1 C 0�1t y mGGIIy TTmQ< Jc D SS y bN �1Ap "`O DQ O� pi rO�NS �� 1A� �In �.r �` SI f�� O JnSD Y1y ^-i T--rD (A11nO = <�A Pmm G) N m x Zm $ a5 .+- O ZOZ �m mu m a�`A (pT76 �TYn sD00 D Dp C ny� o A Z •m Om Amm 4CCCyCCCy1 Zm Nnr�y T mmy�m �3mn1^ ��tDm1� m� m pO CZ rr Oy $ y ° C ° y �� DrOm g Q �y r0g-ymy mfrlm Am0 �9yS,I� D �yAm �- O }Z5 C y m OOO S�pIO my L'0 ,N� rtmr ;pjZf ZF O- O C C y Z r 8181 p 9 Z > mSJO Ny�y � �m 09Q mC3 y SyA r00 o m D 2 m Z m 6 [mrn « O N� ;m Nr r9titi3 <A Q? N A31 8 y� 80 VQy g n€jNDxiliS _ ®SPY\! ® ©; p A Im 7.1 4'J m n Z m � Q l� QQ a� yo_r��� ion n B% �y 8 °➢ ° Amyr•'DOyc��a¢ m 4 �mg y� or$ m N <xi x 4 € z °$po�JsC��OimJm 5 p y �yy qt Dyey �(-''� o Z3 sz S- °d 8QmrRlm ;;m ; ;cy� !M1 m n Sy �z52 DD m Z ;Gi'f ITI S9'j p rrli Q3AAD�=pym1C SQ LZ O m ;i� inm TOT OOADmmO jz$�ag V N lJ O ;r,� S m A O�(!I� Z-1 bbb yr mZi �Zn = p rn ^ -myi Z�y�tmil s u�r.l� .CDI p r,� +�it0 4 .0 0 (�Ij z 1'I rDyir m OO me rOZm -jbs Ai -ml A9m BSI Cf u m m�ivwo:. �e� ��'°', 1n m0 C mN O N�yy �LL r 9 8 cbF �m m r TD �sn1m �� 'm $'13'm a $H yWN ^S�u f3 a m ; vm � o Fo �vv vo vvvv v vv c➢i�.c➢i. n�,c➢iK a ��nSDi���� � �my,�i pQc mc- p;cpc`:�t� p LAN D e CENTRAL PARK m rA DESIGN N PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS m PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA SOUTH Landscape Archdecture /i_and Planning /Environmental Consulting �3 /p2 a� �m� \`\� n�Z \� m �\i m Any Mm I R�3 a m� - - -- L Vin$ D yyy _._._. aM m. S nC Gill rp9 A mFH m� a� A8� b B a H T �� g -m o MXmZ 0 x ?rn �, v 0 Z "' a OO 47 O< = mi 0 N O 3 Z �m in oA 0 K D N o c x i m � r mA PPP v mnP F X C, O ii iS' u �A X888 �n>2 J4D �A� �wm DO �c Xi X 2 m m p m m m ff}} � ?9 Z C n T Z 7 r m�m CNG ,u r XDO C) m I \ CMG x F�l r ;tnl N M C rVi amv E I k < O y m e -p� ` ]! \ G) Cn A m `\ o m \ m < i as ZO as i i JHw Fi �p r %N o 8 =l C moQ � 44 r m Z CNOm0 a0 0 D m < D00m O m bg �if,�tii � o o n o0 00 0 0 0 0 y y < mom _m m -0 p�' o� w o 9� 90 9 Nl >T DD �TA d C mA CAA C A ?> � gimi�i� ggDAOImmci s.��0 9-m— -m,n o�m m- o 9 z0 �O S zz mm NN mmC 9{ G m -C ayyiD mm yy m', �N NN Dmmm �� dim SAO O <9?1C)�iAy f31j11 N�> > » avmm 2S y 10= B S ASm y N NN H.1% >° Cr H �y �p rCA-1 Ng9 A !m $m 6-- 4$i� 1WC r&O N® g x g� c Im p y NY � O � • O b w o �NVyymyy�ydy tJWmP�m>aP(/��ei 16 16 99 V9 mme90%. V 0 ro� CENT s PREPARED FO PALM BEACH > TRASH ROOM �i u� o jzibo \'a g k� L rcrmn�yo�maTN m;�o9cm��Li�c� u��mninr. C N LiiDmO D�SnAy OOmASZ $my b �p Zn ZZ ❑ mmD C0 NO �m ❑ mz >O vm S0 m -AI �7 Z �(1� mmA, -D'n Am2R�i L<'IA y Qyuj�oti c77a4 C Sm rn'm mmc�'jm�n some' mmm ea o !ng 8 A m D m v m O m A P u N G)��sF��F'FQ� Z °rv1 �6 o�i-01 S O ��sg� °�A �n yi���zm� q, i ;ZZryIlo DNZpNm D yy m0 D r A Y O Q N TmD A rtl SA m��^'m Ay� o �5 oy o�� F? ; §� yy 00 oN $ m Nv'❑�ma D D N P N 0 AO mi N mg> omm F N 4 m y y m V T N D im �ftA Z •� 9 ht > AN Z [ mm 14 z 81 TN 7J; m °°s np 8N m °'� Z Y m£ o a- vy mF J� F F \,', I -1_ �a ;y1 z,- NIP ssass��LL$$ 3 A +t J L II D D fprl n D _ l-[�1 pp Zpp yy pypyx y� ��$z$zjj F m m OR o Y +7 m O A AU]lrcc rr a 'av- -1 AAO yAN II�11 UmU9 (/7 O m 01 O�m mA VAm AXA A _ m 0-2----0-- 00 zmp ap POOH, O, A Aye > >aNmO AOn ONOmO� O Z vOOm Cm -C ZZZ m--9 oC_N889 >mmmmmm'mnmm NmAmmmm�f 2 SCI -FmOppyy CV�y�y �Ty [[[yyyDC�N DTZC �jVyoAEA❑ ❑ ❑� nO cAON�TJGCCCCCn CC yCZCCC Cp mmn>0 -mm OZpf7$ImmfDyfl xyyyNl mp0 O pZ y9 m C9�mmny Fm�p?ObOO�NNN Ayy�mAm ZSZsZ y❑L2 iz ZZZ ZmZZ GZAizz�r� pia CApia CA rQ }rFO �10$OyO A A NnD Am�i �� m�A �Cmid0X3X 04)09,) 99 9099 090 04 o g8 iF m O_❑ D ig A am' mrzii � s^oO C�_A�y ;n ,j �jm Q,; of 4Z Tj >, SC�mRc;m ; a� �jaa� Nei c H 11C� A P'(pm �nmm�mo °gm' goSg m000000 Or 4mm D moHo. � N m r� +��+�^DC_��pA �-p� NAT��"'pR� '�,Q� °°gr�rR�f��Q�� � p� ..5p� 07 �'Z NO n m .3 Oo �T gGgn Z9 bii 3� � Cy ,"�, � i� ~�Upg py W 5 a�5t z �y NmmfmC� _d} o y 2z C' s 0z C LLp m O; aamN�, ; ,s,N�o t22 $5"!9981 m ssEgg4.2 n ,c>in.�i�X,c>iX :F,t>i�,Dinnnr A nyNRTTTTTTT .'i',- ��rr,,N,r,�',�', ac �i �� RAL PARK LAND R EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN GARDENS, FLORIDA SOUTH Landscape Architecture /Land Planning /Environmental Consulting m 8 A y y y Ar m m CZ T C yy m N QY � D C A G Z Z Z Z _ O ❑� ° 'o. m ,yy N O O m; Z z o o ( AO mm ZD p G) < N _y z m z z> A �s 9 7 D m33 S i�yyy m A in za ya T O C m A ;A 09� D Z _ X. D O jj iA C Z _ m OD s oy z y y om m oN > m-0 Rb 7 0 o x i o N w TT O n O va D _ __ Z y NON m m m N "' r m Ar00 r z QNv N N �sm �o A' � ;m I 181 131 t a- vy mF J� F F \,', I -1_ �a ;y1 z,- NIP ssass��LL$$ 3 A +t J L II D D fprl n D _ l-[�1 pp Zpp yy pypyx y� ��$z$zjj F m m OR o Y +7 m O A AU]lrcc rr a 'av- -1 AAO yAN II�11 UmU9 (/7 O m 01 O�m mA VAm AXA A _ m 0-2----0-- 00 zmp ap POOH, O, A Aye > >aNmO AOn ONOmO� O Z vOOm Cm -C ZZZ m--9 oC_N889 >mmmmmm'mnmm NmAmmmm�f 2 SCI -FmOppyy CV�y�y �Ty [[[yyyDC�N DTZC �jVyoAEA❑ ❑ ❑� nO cAON�TJGCCCCCn CC yCZCCC Cp mmn>0 -mm OZpf7$ImmfDyfl xyyyNl mp0 O pZ y9 m C9�mmny Fm�p?ObOO�NNN Ayy�mAm ZSZsZ y❑L2 iz ZZZ ZmZZ GZAizz�r� pia CApia CA rQ }rFO �10$OyO A A NnD Am�i �� m�A �Cmid0X3X 04)09,) 99 9099 090 04 o g8 iF m O_❑ D ig A am' mrzii � s^oO C�_A�y ;n ,j �jm Q,; of 4Z Tj >, SC�mRc;m ; a� �jaa� Nei c H 11C� A P'(pm �nmm�mo °gm' goSg m000000 Or 4mm D moHo. � N m r� +��+�^DC_��pA �-p� NAT��"'pR� '�,Q� °°gr�rR�f��Q�� � p� ..5p� 07 �'Z NO n m .3 Oo �T gGgn Z9 bii 3� � Cy ,"�, � i� ~�Upg py W 5 a�5t z �y NmmfmC� _d} o y 2z C' s 0z C LLp m O; aamN�, ; ,s,N�o t22 $5"!9981 m ssEgg4.2 n ,c>in.�i�X,c>iX :F,t>i�,Dinnnr A nyNRTTTTTTT .'i',- ��rr,,N,r,�',�', ac �i �� RAL PARK LAND R EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN GARDENS, FLORIDA SOUTH Landscape Architecture /Land Planning /Environmental Consulting 0 0 0 ' ' ro �iP o�z X40 �� mm ao vo �A m�1 D a0 �> T m m n C N m Z Q mo ¢ T R i m c A m 2 m 0 °m O 61 07 m *m ii I 4 rA j D S G S f B 0 D r C ^� V/ K M z --+ M r D 2 am: z N i O O � m Z Z O D A m Z X M T m O r m 6 � O j y � y �4 3 11 N D 2 O < N D m O m m < m m ?mm I o N y o A� �o i 'I.1 z DO > O y =A 9 A� 9 9 �Iy1 I A yN ZUI Z-I om ZA rr 9 K W. p ~m NT aaOy O° COp nO S A O V" D �y57 I 029 O=9 TO p�2 mZ >N p= '- zR z,. m— pmm Z im z�m mo O ° >y mC) TaC r�r= D 4 N D AO OD Om0 z7 Z7 A °po z Amm mho z z z V �v I >m �m 4S. � R 0 i i I I I I 1 of N �I. 9iti I gl 0 I I N I p I I I � y C o m NW i �$ a x � (N CA �o A� 1 �Ve ? N zm I n m m yD LZ] P I D D N N m O Om0 AA;� mm N2 D20 r $r m y ~y pDp lily � V O8y N z C N y z Z p 0 0 ?p m O O 00 O N O R N A AOV ? -4 T.'mUC Tpp y TN D A =.0° mmp o�i�, m.z 'd'iyn O p NA A T Or mT O CENTRAL PARK PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA A � mw v z<D < o' r m00 9 T �mm � o m lb �p �o J LAND DESIGN SOUTH Landscape Architecture /Land Planning/Environmental Consulting z N N ya m O m ; �j D mr- LZI O -. D 22 Z N y 0 N y o A� �o i 'I.1 z DO > O y =A 9 A� 9 9 �Iy1 I A yN ZUI Z-I om ZA rr 9 K W. p ~m NT aaOy O° COp nO S A O V" D �y57 I 029 O=9 TO p�2 mZ >N p= '- zR z,. m— pmm Z im z�m mo O ° >y mC) TaC r�r= D 4 N D AO OD Om0 z7 Z7 A °po z Amm mho z z z V �v I >m �m 4S. � R 0 i i I I I I 1 of N �I. 9iti I gl 0 I I N I p I I I � y C o m NW i �$ a x � (N CA �o A� 1 �Ve ? N zm I n m m yD LZ] P I D D N N m O Om0 AA;� mm N2 D20 r $r m y ~y pDp lily � V O8y N z C N y z Z p 0 0 ?p m O O 00 O N O R N A AOV ? -4 T.'mUC Tpp y TN D A =.0° mmp o�i�, m.z 'd'iyn O p NA A T Or mT O CENTRAL PARK PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA A � mw v z<D < o' r m00 9 T �mm � o m lb �p �o J LAND DESIGN SOUTH Landscape Architecture /Land Planning/Environmental Consulting D n r_ Z m U) m m r 4 Nm o ° m V y O Z T —tz Zqr a B a r� MATCHLINE SEE L -6 i i i i i =g zD a z� °{n^ az� Z zo mm �i ° �� �y�N m ai -y o imnx m C m 2 m • a1 p Y Co m 4'v$� m� �6 mD m 2 m tm� zm m C ; °N D m o O N C N m O r4 °-i Z _1 Z O A mm m v 0° �Y 2 D 1 p ° y mm �� O D 0 0 n02 m z < O z ,cip u'�r O O� O m 1 x n �n x D m m yy � ~ < -0 Z fn i a ° m CZ) o � s Fn N f O < y (n a r� MATCHLINE SEE L -6 i i i i i =g zD a z� °{n^ az� Z zo mm �i ° �� �y�N m ai -y o imnx K C m 2 m _ y � a1 p Co m m N N oo m� �6 mD m 2 m tm� zm m C ; °N D m o O N C N m O r4 °-i Z _1 Z O A mm m v 0° �Y 2 D 1 p ° y mm �� O D 0 0 n02 m z < O z ,cip u'�r O O� O m 1 x n �n x D m m yy � ~ < -0 Z fn i ° m CZ) p$ s Fn � f O < y (n < O3 sN o ,g td y o� bray ton N v J M J rb a �z y y x z CENTRAL PARK PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA =g r � CIl con C i i 'z I�d CrJ r ►z, r� a H y r LAND DESIGN SOUTH Landscape Architecture /Land PlanninglEnvimnmental Consuming • • MATCHLINE SE 00 0WC zz 0 ti cn N _1 i Q m O - I w >m I`I 0 0 D�C :z I _ O 1 O >° Cn I YY rn I �m ,W rC I 2 2 rn M 0 T m o a � L - TM- 0 00 wAm YT 00 or-c-- _ z z U, 0 T 1 � I E L -5 c T z O mm D M O m N m m m p -1 O X wo mZ m G) C: c0 wb ' z rn m 9C mm D a m ~ m O O 2 m Z GD)0 F L mm m O 3 O MN m0 * A A m m mo DO �., Z nC5 -Im C> O Ic m °I 'O N C � D0 m m0 z I J I yD C�..1 0 0 o ,I I N> o op Dzm pl o I �N No ;I Z> m DM zo m �� i m zN�NI m cn c i y p g o m G1 3I I �m� D x z DG1 T y� y I co � m— W ® Zx a" >m OfAmn _ _ -------- mmm AE =I ;tj 0 —I A m N �m O i �; mo C m m� Cam zz I mm q y � �I I - [iii 10 I i D F m a .y �� m O m O m 1 D I mo° n f I V o °� o �0z Z V z O Q O m r O O f - I t f f m A �x O r ; v xi =I t f t _ A �n < , m C A D r -Di z p f f f i � D y m o < y>g� f t 2 0 I z m D $ =t O 0 m f f f 1 m I m z I « f t •I �' •15,.E -- - - - - -- -- m - m m m o f f - a m I o ° PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS N =I f N�� ca o o I t f X Doz Ei Z z;2, PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA �y0 I m ° m I N I O � ry I >r m I � - N I N 9 Sri �C L7 0 r C x o CN D (7 do c c z WW l0 0 T�Z �c o - _ r • MATCHLINE SE 00 0WC zz 0 ti cn N _1 i Q m O - I w >m I`I 0 0 D�C :z I _ O 1 O >° Cn I YY rn I �m ,W rC I 2 2 rn M 0 T m o a � L - TM- 0 00 wAm YT 00 or-c-- _ z z U, 0 T 1 � I E L -5 c T z O mm D M O m N m m m p -1 O X wo mZ m G) C: c0 wb ' z rn m 9C mm D a m ~ m O O 2 m Z GD)0 F L mm m O 3 O MN m0 * A A m m mo DO �., Z nC5 -Im C> O Ic m °I 'O N C � D0 m m0 z I J I m C�..1 ,I nmo ti< _ I — —o moo moo Z> m DM Jr 0m / O N O O z I �m GpIM '< �� m DI I I I .AO\ II mzmo �m� m x z DG1 n< m (XO DD m ® I I _ _ -------- p51 N m myZ m 0 I r —i J _._._._.__.__.__ O D 2 O-._._._._._._._ • MATCHLINE SE 00 0WC zz 0 ti cn N _1 i Q m O - I w >m I`I 0 0 D�C :z I _ O 1 O >° Cn I YY rn I �m ,W rC I 2 2 rn M 0 T m o a � L - TM- 0 00 wAm YT 00 or-c-- _ z z U, 0 T 1 � I E L -5 c T z O mm D M O m N m m m p -1 O X wo mZ m G) C: c0 wb ' z rn m 9C mm D a m ~ m O O 2 m Z GD)0 F L mm m O 3 O MN m0 * A A m m mo DO �., Z nC5 -Im C> O Ic m °I 'O N C � D0 m m0 z I J I z A Oo W N G • �Q s � ( >`-m >0 °m m 0 0m N m 8C rri 0 m T = m pOtn oil! zr- D �'o9 Im T = I OI 0 I I O� 1 � I0 rn m I X I D D =mC) Ati I I L FORM x DDN1 ml m I D D > zm2 . I _ o Z zp o m O i my I 0 o x z mmO J < D I mm (A o 6 T Md z No m I m� �C �n I U I I I I I E31 --,] I X I I D DO I ern o-�Z' Nan O Oy I P I I LAND DESIGN SOUTH Landscape Architecturell-and Planning /Environmental Consulting m C�..1 ,I nmo ti< _ I — —o moo moo Z> m DM r w° D N 0m / O N O O z I �m GpIM '< �� m DI I I I - mzmo �m� m x z DG1 n< m (XO DD m ® I I _ _ -------- p51 N m myZ m 0 I r —i J _._._._.__.__.__ O D 2 O-._._._._._._._ m �� mz Cam m Z OO m° mM ._._._._._._._- ._._._.- ._._.__ -w -'- - '- -I - - - -i I < m Z V I 01 2S mz� co Om z �O ------- - - - - -- I i � Ip I I I 5 �d8 CENTRAL PARK �' •15,.E -- - - - - -- -- -- 159.98 - - r m gay CENTRALBOULEVARD g PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS -- I PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA z A Oo W N G • �Q s � ( >`-m >0 °m m 0 0m N m 8C rri 0 m T = m pOtn oil! zr- D �'o9 Im T = I OI 0 I I O� 1 � I0 rn m I X I D D =mC) Ati I I L FORM x DDN1 ml m I D D > zm2 . I _ o Z zp o m O i my I 0 o x z mmO J < D I mm (A o 6 T Md z No m I m� �C �n I U I I I I I E31 --,] I X I I D DO I ern o-�Z' Nan O Oy I P I I LAND DESIGN SOUTH Landscape Architecturell-and Planning /Environmental Consulting I of �� - Im I I x z DG1 m Z O ° mxrn om� pOm �Z X I p51 N ONO m m myZ m 0 mom ° N z ° Io Z0 �� mz Cam I y m° mM WAN ;gym g < m Z V I 01 2S mz� co Om z �O i � Ip I I I 5 �d8 CENTRAL PARK r m gay g PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA >r z A Oo W N G • �Q s � ( >`-m >0 °m m 0 0m N m 8C rri 0 m T = m pOtn oil! zr- D �'o9 Im T = I OI 0 I I O� 1 � I0 rn m I X I D D =mC) Ati I I L FORM x DDN1 ml m I D D > zm2 . I _ o Z zp o m O i my I 0 o x z mmO J < D I mm (A o 6 T Md z No m I m� �C �n I U I I I I I E31 --,] I X I I D DO I ern o-�Z' Nan O Oy I P I I LAND DESIGN SOUTH Landscape Architecturell-and Planning /Environmental Consulting 0 I° O H m D =I r z mI Cf)I m I( M rl (o I I I e e 6 9 v lm 90 pZN mm v �Cn z ZZ {An mA� z v m y c B O A- 0v ;00 z 'W'm'm Pmm s i v , j Z m O 8p z m N-2 Ail �^t C A" ° mNrn N ny as O fn in 52 00 N v Z oNi M 0 In 2 2 O0 m z Z Oz O p <8 p 0 In O ; A D z a/m F y a0 g v N $ 2o M m D F 0 w D rtN mN N 2 i O Z O m m �e8 0 TT TT 0�z In `I N C N 11 m N 1, 1 r 1, T Oz_ G) - - Dr m y c B O A- 0v ;00 z 'W'm'm Pmm s i v , j Z m O 8p z m N-2 Ail �^t C A" ° mNrn N ny as O fn in 52 00 N v Z oNi M 0 In 2 2 O0 m z Z Oz O p <8 p 0 In O ; A D z a/m F y a0 g v N $ 2o M m D F 0 w D rtN mN N 2 i O Z O m in mp m� Z -1N O `L; yOy mm0��0 � 0 �2 -N12� C� N C m O � m 0C 0 2� Z MATCHLINE SEE L -10 CENTRAL PARK PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA _X '00$z � mom2 ?: n RCN I ._._._._.- .- .- .- . -. -.I ..................... _ r z M cn m _. _..I m cn ' YY (7 N W --A W � �oz I i-- v= I yy� I LAND DESIGN SOUTH Landscape Architecture /Land Planning /Environmental Consulting �e8 in mp m� Z -1N O `L; yOy mm0��0 � 0 �2 -N12� C� N C m O � m 0C 0 2� Z MATCHLINE SEE L -10 CENTRAL PARK PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA _X '00$z � mom2 ?: n RCN I ._._._._.- .- .- .- . -. -.I ..................... _ r z M cn m _. _..I m cn ' YY (7 N W --A W � �oz I i-- v= I yy� I LAND DESIGN SOUTH Landscape Architecture /Land Planning /Environmental Consulting I I o> I I a a W A MATCHLINE SEE L -7 f f f t f � _f v ; m m I v � I I „ ml z01 D �I Z< ml I 0m� D > a I gym" 000 mi O D C D m � "9 I n D n D m I I I I E E m I k E t f f t f f t t k f t f t f E E f t < E t k t t t k t k f t k k E k t f f ! f f 3 m E f k f f f y k f E k f v t f E f < k E I � f E f T C T C C I Z �Nm° �13m0m D m 0 x �m Z 191 .Zl C Z ' MmI �D r Z m Cn m Im I7 10) I I sXC co r- > I > m0 m I go: Is --1 I N N D m Z D A m _ .N poD Z Z -art Cc� < °m °- D 2 N v 5 71 m a � m °m o � Z m mC) O zC M O m 0 $ Ta z m -c- "E C N 0 x y O A m m- m D a T r m m y -1 D m r_ C D m O O N o rn m 9 C 0, p�z D mm v D 4 p xs O mac m m � n z x � z Z m O v O C O p C x m h� S D z ct D r y va z D � y mn O D 2 C y C O O — rr <D r R m D rr a O N � ti o 3 C MATCHLINE SEE L -7 f f f t f � _f v ; m m I v � I I „ ml z01 D �I Z< ml I 0m� D > a I gym" 000 mi O D C D m � "9 I n D n D m I I I I E E m I k E t f f t f f t t k f t f t f E E f t < E t k t t t k t k f t k k E k t f f ! f f 3 m E f k f f f y k f E k f v t f E f < k E I � f E f T C T C C I Z �Nm° �13m0m D m 0 x �m Z 191 .Zl C Z ' MmI �D r Z m Cn m Im I7 10) I I sXC co r- > I > m0 m I go: Is --1 I N m ma �m CENTRAL PARK LAND m &gg a 7 PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN IN m PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA SOUTH Landscape Architecture /Land Planning /Environmental Consulting � I I Z =,N� m I u9 Np CI ` �A z:6 ,l�l� zC D2� C2 az �m ' >y ml Im 0\ >y ,� gD 0mZOI p A S O m 2 Z. Z ae m m OO O i n D C m D m z m r m y D C ryr >z m0 N _ nI ° x < x ; z A z 0 m <O r O I O p ,n T � D $gym °I m n m yyip i t N N o Z m I oq�I ai Zm DI Pm�I p < D � I I I :1 I ��� &off rn U O $ O m C) N Op D T p MATCHLINE SEE L -11 F'\_ _— _-- - - - - -- - -- — ZT� —T— T z p 00 P 00 o y'm C0 \ >C I \ Zm m n � \\ 0 In - - -yam. -; �..•�- �.r� � .�- � ' •� I / � ° Ia�Tp m� 0 rn o CIO �A m D YY n A IIf 1 j c f0A to ni w X0 mm co —4 mm � W r x o�Z zz NG7� �'n� zz O o < I Ng n C N D �n < yy N � I I Z =,N� m I u9 Np CI ` �A z:6 ,l�l� zC D2� C2 az �m ' >y ml Im 0\ >y ,� gD 0mZOI p A S O m 2 Z. Z ae m m OO O i n D C m D m z m r m y D C ryr >z m0 N _ nI ° x < x ; z A z 0 m <O r O I O p ,n T � D $gym °I m n m yyip i t N N o Z m I oq�I ai Zm DI Pm�I p < D � I I I :1 I ��� &off rn U O $ O m C) N Op D T p I - z m A D m < m z� 0 O $ T 0 O z p z m z z P �m # d _ I I m c c c N m m m< I ; Cn m I = r xDm a I p m I D I � I 7 I m -T' Dm p 0,: om K U" z :l7 K Z Q _ I z IT rn r C5 0 o I iN mZ, tl �^� �$I m z - z 0D �m -m +k mo- mo °I m Zm -H>T�z �C° N< I ?� �,Z,,Op58 �1 A r A V n, p$ I I �� r 1 N< 19 I N ° cm NC IZ y - - ° - - - - - -- •- -• - -- - -- -- Im aD LC A _ N _ 0 I x N � ON q ZN �cc< I $yJ� v0 mW mzC� q!m ;g C>, U o� m 02 'a j 0 m m mN Im 0m�� I OD Om m : I �_ 0 Z I V0 i _ol• praiir o / ����71 :1►���� %��S4Ji'�i�]�v.�� \:V I�3ls. �� -_��� 1����I!'� - If•I�� ®IIIIIIIIII IIIIIII�&�'��lilll lllii'e��II��Fff7 .Glu.:e, rT m0 m C z goo m °mom oar D m A Uop m O < y z z m A �� �. � �""�� �c �x �e iT�cr�lt c• 7A���! �i] ti�S ]vS'1�iL�i�7rvG:_rllz�::;:ll.�� �f� • E,� E3)� ?;:I�..v:i 0.4 -. �. �T�.,� nm.>ss�L• "V i r.• �.., n la �1 •f.::! ► Ifilrrcar��eviaw��� 11!! ' ���T�ra�y�g_ ��gljj [e��nr�!����r������f�� ® ®�■ - i���1���p�py���::f? • a� jug", Ism �Ch =olo A �� d �� mz§so �+zmCV mrn LIOZN mC - zm mr zmn' rmn'Ro �C ! mm °m� m \ O I CENTRAL PARK LAND PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA SOUTH WMEN Landscape Architecture /Land Planning/Envimnmental Consulting I o �m # d N n � o I � I 7 I m -T' Dm p 0,: om K U" z :l7 K Z Q _ I z IT rn r C5 0 o I iN mZ, tl �^� �$I m z - z 0D �m -m +k mo- mo °I m Zm -H>T�z �C° N< I ?� �,Z,,Op58 �1 A r A V n, p$ I I �� r 1 N< 19 I N ° cm NC IZ y - - ° - - - - - -- •- -• - -- - -- -- Im aD LC A _ N _ 0 I x N � ON q ZN �cc< I $yJ� v0 mW mzC� q!m ;g C>, U o� m 02 'a j 0 m m mN Im 0m�� I OD Om m : I �_ 0 Z I V0 i _ol• praiir o / ����71 :1►���� %��S4Ji'�i�]�v.�� \:V I�3ls. �� -_��� 1����I!'� - If•I�� ®IIIIIIIIII IIIIIII�&�'��lilll lllii'e��II��Fff7 .Glu.:e, rT m0 m C z goo m °mom oar D m A Uop m O < y z z m A �� �. � �""�� �c �x �e iT�cr�lt c• 7A���! �i] ti�S ]vS'1�iL�i�7rvG:_rllz�::;:ll.�� �f� • E,� E3)� ?;:I�..v:i 0.4 -. �. �T�.,� nm.>ss�L• "V i r.• �.., n la �1 •f.::! ► Ifilrrcar��eviaw��� 11!! ' ���T�ra�y�g_ ��gljj [e��nr�!����r������f�� ® ®�■ - i���1���p�py���::f? • a� jug", Ism �Ch =olo A �� d �� mz§so �+zmCV mrn LIOZN mC - zm mr zmn' rmn'Ro �C ! mm °m� m \ O I CENTRAL PARK LAND PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA SOUTH WMEN Landscape Architecture /Land Planning/Envimnmental Consulting q ZN �cc< I $yJ� v0 mW mzC� q!m ;g C>, U o� m 02 'a j 0 m m mN Im 0m�� I OD Om m : I �_ 0 Z I V0 i _ol• praiir o / ����71 :1►���� %��S4Ji'�i�]�v.�� \:V I�3ls. �� -_��� 1����I!'� - If•I�� ®IIIIIIIIII IIIIIII�&�'��lilll lllii'e��II��Fff7 .Glu.:e, rT m0 m C z goo m °mom oar D m A Uop m O < y z z m A �� �. � �""�� �c �x �e iT�cr�lt c• 7A���! �i] ti�S ]vS'1�iL�i�7rvG:_rllz�::;:ll.�� �f� • E,� E3)� ?;:I�..v:i 0.4 -. �. �T�.,� nm.>ss�L• "V i r.• �.., n la �1 •f.::! ► Ifilrrcar��eviaw��� 11!! ' ���T�ra�y�g_ ��gljj [e��nr�!����r������f�� ® ®�■ - i���1���p�py���::f? • a� jug", Ism �Ch =olo A �� d �� mz§so �+zmCV mrn LIOZN mC - zm mr zmn' rmn'Ro �C ! mm °m� m \ O I CENTRAL PARK LAND PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA SOUTH WMEN Landscape Architecture /Land Planning/Envimnmental Consulting praiir o / ����71 :1►���� %��S4Ji'�i�]�v.�� \:V I�3ls. �� -_��� 1����I!'� - If•I�� ®IIIIIIIIII IIIIIII�&�'��lilll lllii'e��II��Fff7 .Glu.:e, rT m0 m C z goo m °mom oar D m A Uop m O < y z z m A �� �. � �""�� �c �x �e iT�cr�lt c• 7A���! �i] ti�S ]vS'1�iL�i�7rvG:_rllz�::;:ll.�� �f� • E,� E3)� ?;:I�..v:i 0.4 -. �. �T�.,� nm.>ss�L• "V i r.• �.., n la �1 •f.::! ► Ifilrrcar��eviaw��� 11!! ' ���T�ra�y�g_ ��gljj [e��nr�!����r������f�� ® ®�■ - i���1���p�py���::f? • a� jug", Ism �Ch =olo A �� d �� mz§so �+zmCV mrn LIOZN mC - zm mr zmn' rmn'Ro �C ! mm °m� m \ O I CENTRAL PARK LAND PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA SOUTH WMEN Landscape Architecture /Land Planning/Envimnmental Consulting rT m0 m C z goo m °mom oar D m A Uop m O < y z z m A �� �. � �""�� �c �x �e iT�cr�lt c• 7A���! �i] ti�S ]vS'1�iL�i�7rvG:_rllz�::;:ll.�� �f� • E,� E3)� ?;:I�..v:i 0.4 -. �. �T�.,� nm.>ss�L• "V i r.• �.., n la �1 •f.::! ► Ifilrrcar��eviaw��� 11!! ' ���T�ra�y�g_ ��gljj [e��nr�!����r������f�� ® ®�■ - i���1���p�py���::f? • a� jug", Ism �Ch =olo A �� d �� mz§so �+zmCV mrn LIOZN mC - zm mr zmn' rmn'Ro �C ! mm °m� m \ O I CENTRAL PARK LAND PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA SOUTH WMEN Landscape Architecture /Land Planning/Envimnmental Consulting �Ch =olo A �� d �� mz§so �+zmCV mrn LIOZN mC - zm mr zmn' rmn'Ro �C ! mm °m� m \ O I CENTRAL PARK LAND PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA SOUTH WMEN Landscape Architecture /Land Planning/Envimnmental Consulting zD �� z ; Z� _C' \ g A Z / ... c Aj Z O � m AN i / 0 O \ ♦ ♦.-1 N A 0 o b \ �N N \ _�� ioo 1 \ ` ♦� mmC.� o mm Sp my rZT _10m A O \ �"` m�; 01, o' F \`�\ i m c J o ON c? Oz i�z mN fn ; \ g o0 o Fa SF n yyym~ -+2 CM m�Ln� v Tn nri m m O m D P � m C°i ct (fin K W mine m O L1 D Z T z d D o PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS #Y ° 2 m? PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA C O= C01 > g $ >z� y z N $ O O D N 3 D m m m O m 1 ° n > m Z o g 0 0 y?y In S ni � N D Z n O O 0o� mx m �uro 1 n ?/ 0� 6g.LZtN bs tJ" 1 O I l 8 v. y T = T 1 Q I < I I ` Cn �,pm >0 (N O I I � ID I n I= I z Im I Cn Im �m �r I m NI �o "T7 N . I I m im<r'Z �aO \ m0� \\ mo�o0 I I � A _C' \ g A m / ... N m 1 ♦. / \ D m I > A Z / t t O \ ♦ ♦.-1 N A 0 o b \ \ V♦ \ _�� ioo 1 \ ` ♦� mmC.� o mm Sp my rZT _10m A O \ �"` m�; 01, o' \`�\ i m c J o \ \� ; \ g o0 o Fa SF n yyym~ -+2 O 0o� mx m �uro 1 n ?/ 0� 6g.LZtN bs tJ" 1 O I l 8 v. y T = T 1 Q I < I I ` Cn �,pm >0 (N O I I � ID I n I= I z Im I Cn Im �m �r I m NI �o "T7 N . I I m im<r'Z �aO \ m0� \\ mo�o0 m mN �m m C m' m�N cT, I m�4 n D O m 9 I Cn m YY C") 0 0 -=-I m z z N�'71 TI I I T \I �N 1cy tA^ l J I = Ir Z m I W `$m m I r �m CD v O 8 �\ I I \\ N o 1 LAND DESIGN SOUTH Landscape Architecture /Land PlanninglEnvlmnmental Consulting A _C' \ g A z _�� .`•`• pmt N AC m NmD Z .Z m m v \ _ A <o m A m v "- �,y -4 .0 o A m�Z o'n v m m A f v' m \ _�� ioo 1 \ ` ♦� mmC.� o ``\ ��? Sp my rZT _10m A O \ �"` m�; 01, o' \`�\ i m c J o m mN �m m C m' m�N cT, I m�4 n D O m 9 I Cn m YY C") 0 0 -=-I m z z N�'71 TI I I T \I �N 1cy tA^ l J I = Ir Z m I W `$m m I r �m CD v O 8 �\ I I \\ N o 1 LAND DESIGN SOUTH Landscape Architecture /Land PlanninglEnvlmnmental Consulting A _C' \ g A z m z o m m v \ _ v "- �,y P� v m m A f v' m A � \ N o O = N v v = \ g o0 o Fa SF n yyym~ -+2 m�Ln� v Tn nri g! K W mine CENTRAL PARK z d PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS #Y ° PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA m mN �m m C m' m�N cT, I m�4 n D O m 9 I Cn m YY C") 0 0 -=-I m z z N�'71 TI I I T \I �N 1cy tA^ l J I = Ir Z m I W `$m m I r �m CD v O 8 �\ I I \\ N o 1 LAND DESIGN SOUTH Landscape Architecture /Land PlanninglEnvlmnmental Consulting 0 0 0 Z D A F 2 Z D 2 A Z Q A fm/! 1 2 m I u m m 0 i D m z �O D 010 j A• a° mn rn rn N t Ox OA ern ;1 0Z < m 1 r -'M y m �N mg ioj � 2 m 0 m urOp . Z p m D y A O Z n O m f 0 n n O 0 <<O p p m _O O v m m A N ~ S m n m n m z a yy n r m m Q n p p U c S p = O O m y y m m m C n m � u O < < m m D $ r i 0 3 t: H 8 Z 0 m 1 1 rr DI �I =1 r_I Z m� U M M r� 0 WW I MATCHLINE SEE L -9 �p, 0 z 0 Om �c� pmz':�o m� C r D Z o A � nm U) m IT! Ul Z DDW zmm NAn D mYg� CENTRAL PARK LAND PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN SON 4 o PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA S O U T H 9 IS Landscape ArchitecturalLand Planning/Environmental Consulting • • • so-+� Z c �b 0, °m m D z A OZ m A z °Z mN D ym N —i m N Z. p 3 3 m D N m D 2 O Dn CO - Z $O A.i°l gm Om 2'N O> S> () C m p D m 9 fzJl F- OG O (Dn = m O m m m m 91 m m o N v° v m m O � Diz m o� o m m N O o zy z D A ° mm n N m = x m O n ro z m ° O '? 1 0 Jc z+ A 71 z O o O T m O O m O �n x y r yy� A N _n z z ° m N $ x n z �A ° m D m m M O z N M N = O O z y O � O p gym=- b r m � +r m X38# o � SPe N CENTRAL PARK PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA — a LAND DESIGN SOUTH VW Landscape Architecture/Land Planning/Environmental Consulting D meson x o , _ mm�m x�N= m(D7mm , Nmmm N = A ' ° r 1 � 1 m I 1 1 /f,t I / 1 I 1 / 1 1 1 I. 1 ° O 0 1 l.. m A 1 m z m m m m I � 1 1 1 1� 0 mm o > —O r N ' 1 � 1 1 I I 1 1 so-+� Z c �b 0, °m m D z A OZ m A z °Z mN D ym N —i m N Z. p 3 3 m D N m D 2 O Dn CO - Z $O A.i°l gm Om 2'N O> S> () C m p D m 9 fzJl F- OG O (Dn = m O m m m m 91 m m o N v° v m m O � Diz m o� o m m N O o zy z D A ° mm n N m = x m O n ro z m ° O '? 1 0 Jc z+ A 71 z O o O T m O O m O �n x y r yy� A N _n z z ° m N $ x n z �A ° m D m m M O z N M N = O O z y O � O p gym=- b r m � +r m X38# o � SPe N CENTRAL PARK PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA — a LAND DESIGN SOUTH VW Landscape Architecture/Land Planning/Environmental Consulting 0 0 4 T m� mg m� m� ) m� < a mz Z mg m� mg m� m� m� m= m m� m� Z s m� m� • -38 d CENTRAL PARK LAND g a PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN .o o PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA SOUTH Landscape Architecture /Land Planning/Envimnmental ConsuRing 0 0 c�Z D N Or m °m m' m C X) m `nN z ;U z>N R 0, i m ❑ o N y m D= m p $ O z N m yyA Z O N y�y C m m N O 02 OA m A DIp Z m� m� r❑ O m� x N _ D _C m m D m 00 N C m 0 9 ti t m m ❑ N ❑ l Z D O z m 2 m N O O Z ? D -1 A O❑ D y D = A 1 m O N m rtnn O ❑ D S D O O Z O Z Om rFFFFFF< f�i, �m A m❑ O j N O N m A O O ; m A O O Z C D Z m n A T D r F, 1 m > m V yN> A O < � N O Z m Z c y m C), m < A m D N m ^ m z m N O N N = Z m g °` n r C Z r D z 0 n m 0 C Z 00 C r Z G� LAND CENTRAL PARK m3g= b ag d E Z n m ggg m ; r PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN _ PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA SOUTH ey Landscape Architecture/Land PlanninglEnvlmnmenlal Consulting m y Z c im X 3 m m D z m O p p O i Z m D T ti N Z > m O z I D 1 O Z N m O IIE O r O m Z 1 m m mZ O g o m G) z 2e T T T 41 fn o A n m g Z i m z n 0 0 1 U 0 0 D N =p �-i m n0 In > z rFiram O p N0 G1 y � y > m � z m T r 9 N m D y N p pA O o m i ~ m m m Z m n m m = O Y < m Z m a Z m m • • n r C Z r D z D C/) C7 m C z 00 C r z G) N `3 LAND =38s r `` CENTRAL PARK _ m age �� gig n a PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN Y a° z PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA SOUTH y Landscape Architecture /Land Planning /Environmental Consulting m y v Z- D z O 1z D CENTRAL PARK 2 z mgY N m N 0< p 0 0 m 018O s z r r m N z 11 m N n z 0 a p Z PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA SOUTH _ p b N z y v 51 m i g � 0 (pn arty o � vm O 2 O F O A O O 5 O r O N p 0 2 D m �Oy 0 0 cNyiyam m V n p � D C r m y y p V y O > V N F m D y N Q 2 m z N D z z N 2 0 N N y O O m D D m p 0 i y y 0 m m Z m O N DK N 0 Z 0 t g 3 O l� n r C Z r Z O Cn C7 D -v m C Z 00 C r O Z G) CENTRAL PARK LAND mgY 1 2 s z r r PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS D ES I G N m a PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA SOUTH FF b y Landscape Architecture/Land Planning /Envimnmentai Consulting � H sR3 rss Id ,i k ass H S ?s 9 u .fir 6 =yS $ 9 o f P s< A$ F P g ei s R 4 o A.- a ri4R "8841� d PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS _: �, 333 `s 888 0 z Q g y � pA 333 � a "Y g I -` °3 5 � C a t � S fr P i� C i • 6� • � 0� $ �� ��� �'�§ 3 ��� �g�� "ate • in D m qs� € °.R Hi s iNo RRgRRR vf?§ G N N R y y ds dddd 4 J ? m ° � S a N 0. mom m�m�yC 3 i� 1• g q!! 3 ;w Sv n @9 9 N n y3 M RA BA�RRBR R P u u • .. u e�2 ___ 5 i_n i i i_n_P " .•" ." G E YO G k i i i A F k___• " "•" i i. i A p i i E �` § H----------------------- ---_ ____________________________________________ _________________— _— ___________ _ 6 " ° "v" "IPg ii 'gtl G.• gP& . i"'kkA .. w ° 444 N � ��� 9 �°�� � G v •� G G T . . . . " e s e 3 i a 3 Rv_P m a -� � ¢� i�V 7Sa °Pii a�RE i0�iE EiEsns Bi ° °° i6' EPi ° 'o s -_•—______—______________ ' a ____ -------- __ ________________________— ______ -- m ° ° ___p_k -E -- EA E�Eog' pkE9k pek14E E p kkg po kB�EA�G���G k 8o G ASe E6k 6'�66G tl F N °oga muva sa_ ='' "sm F�FaEu _a' 2 _ D F'IApIT "I"R br "IeE EI-ylio I: IF �aa�m �Pg =4si'Ex¢�IS op�5 R9 H sR3 rss Id ,i k ass H S ?s 9 �I C-0 Zr —I D WZ C� r /n 0 Z O /U) n U/ I m 0 r m V O C-0 u .fir 6 =yS $ 9 o f P s< A$ F P g ei s R 4 o <n n9 d PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS �, 333 `s 888 gSg z Q g y §� 333 a "Y g I -` Y C It } Z D m qs� € °.R Hi s iNo RRgRRR vf?§ G N N R y y ds dddd 4 J ? m ° � S a N 0. mom m�m�yC 3 i� 1• g q!! 3 ;w Sv n @9 9 N n y3 M RA BA�RRBR R P Q Q S �I C-0 Zr —I D WZ C� r /n 0 Z O /U) n U/ I m 0 r m V O C-0 LAND DESIGN SOUTH Landscape Architecture /Land PlanninglEnvlronmentat Consulting y o C-0 m9gm =9 r P pgo�; 0 PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS Nag fag gSg � Z 0 y §� g 0 U) -` Y It Z D m qs� G IT ? m ° � S a N 0. mom m�m�yC 3 i� 1• q!! 3 ;w Sv n @9 9 N n RA BA�RRBR R p. Q Q S 5 m apse aaap� aa� 6 ���� 444 N � ��� 9 �°�� � G v •� G T H o 3 3 LAND DESIGN SOUTH Landscape Architecture /Land PlanninglEnvlronmentat Consulting y o C-0 m9gm CENTRAL PARK r 0 PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS Nag fag gSg � Z 0 y §� g 0 U) -` Y Z D All � m qs� G IT ? _ 9 N 0. mom m�m�yC 3 i� 1• q!! 3 ;w Sv n @9 9 N n RA BA�RRBR R p. Q Q S LAND DESIGN SOUTH Landscape Architecture /Land PlanninglEnvlronmentat Consulting y o m9gm CENTRAL PARK r 0 PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS Nag PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA y LAND DESIGN SOUTH Landscape Architecture /Land PlanninglEnvlronmentat Consulting W • T O n .o 0£pa" m Sm;A O D €:p D Z7 ��� m ZJ !H! m im€ ? m mH� I ?y€ (n m p n m D r r m Fz�[t IT V1 4 m o Z O a ' - L o N 3 ? ; v m R cn p x D z cpm i z 0 �oQ ° 1 gm � cmx A m Ngm m sfl �p N _ c/) —I � y ��• Yf 1K 0 3 O u3a 3 3 3 A 4' A§ °n o$ g^ £m � w� n m m ql O . z.. o z m ,7 m 0 m '�I D s E as sg g a Qep� 8 O 0 m O c m m m z W o W T v� O C-) r p O 3 i3 s 3 �6 S �1a,0.z 3 R a c C t D g a�c�3 xpR rti�9 °_CQ� 8 G tl 2 H44 H,•4;� R 4 4 q _4Nq� �o4 D . n.` ° o o D O o n n n N o n o '0 0 n � S >> C D m 2 r rci� O X T A p 2ND 2 S A m C° n p DD i y D N L A 9 v p m O< �G P E S n C mO 8 D D ��oQQ�ase " j gEcsG.a Q R 3?v� aQ� ; get ge Z' "d�3 c g g g ® o f D D yy 3 Ip V 3 g Ss �3 33 3 o�w' ° >"' '"gym ?a4^ 'mmm mm's _mvmm�� � 9 � u � �, > °y a °-' ,'„ °> ,'� � � N � m s 's, a 'd. > 4 - N k y •'� � � w Ry RRR8A$R °R °R$ °8RR 8R�R °88$88 } agN��a " q iti as ° 0 n q$A � n U 0 p� T :0 I 0 s rn N �nl 'Im fn 17 �0 l z 'Iz n1 ;1 0I z �i m z Z� X111 .il l can 2 -II I D z W 2 -I1I - I — —mi I I I I,! -1_I D ' C9 ll_— iIIIII m D II — z. a =£_Z r= d� D =fo vSupm -mvn sv � :f 'a mo- ° q3 g g f " m g�F e Q m tia M. 3 Fr Qg ER Eau °3 s °3 °a $ a3 d g�v wow r Er T3 gSS� n q m m oqy, g e SX p93_ R., �" ^' A 3o v g W V2 Er K "— o E 5 R 3g y CENTRAL PARK LAND g PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN n� W SOUTH D N PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA Landscape Architecture /Land Planning/Environmental Consulting zZ 00 KO M-1 Oy r Z� rZ ;' -A Zr IJ y NZ �O Dy �C m> vm m o Z O a ' - o N 3 ? ; v m R cn p x O L. > 4 n _ ,9 sfl N G 3 O °� C. 3 ° 8� n Q o q U G j N ° m (i -0 B 3 3 - a N D j 3 m r 3 2 _ 2 C � R iO = y m a m m A n m D C7 § 3 3 $ v o o m .. u m m � 3 0 x O ° G n 3 _ 0 m x 0 Z 0 n q$A � n U 0 p� T :0 I 0 s rn N �nl 'Im fn 17 �0 l z 'Iz n1 ;1 0I z �i m z Z� X111 .il l can 2 -II I D z W 2 -I1I - I — —mi I I I I,! -1_I D ' C9 ll_— iIIIII m D II — z. a =£_Z r= d� D =fo vSupm -mvn sv � :f 'a mo- ° q3 g g f " m g�F e Q m tia M. 3 Fr Qg ER Eau °3 s °3 °a $ a3 d g�v wow r Er T3 gSS� n q m m oqy, g e SX p93_ R., �" ^' A 3o v g W V2 Er K "— o E 5 R 3g y CENTRAL PARK LAND g PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN n� W SOUTH D N PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA Landscape Architecture /Land Planning/Environmental Consulting zZ 00 KO M-1 Oy r Z� rZ ;' -A Zr IJ y NZ �O Dy �C m> vm m o Z O Y R g $ 3 o ID O L. > v n 33g ,9 sfl rm= -0 B 3 3 - a N D 3 2 _ 2 R = y J n m D C7 Z o m .. u m m Rg� o ° G n 3 _ 0 m x O 2 i 0 n q$A � n U 0 p� T :0 I 0 s rn N �nl 'Im fn 17 �0 l z 'Iz n1 ;1 0I z �i m z Z� X111 .il l can 2 -II I D z W 2 -I1I - I — —mi I I I I,! -1_I D ' C9 ll_— iIIIII m D II — z. a =£_Z r= d� D =fo vSupm -mvn sv � :f 'a mo- ° q3 g g f " m g�F e Q m tia M. 3 Fr Qg ER Eau °3 s °3 °a $ a3 d g�v wow r Er T3 gSS� n q m m oqy, g e SX p93_ R., �" ^' A 3o v g W V2 Er K "— o E 5 R 3g y CENTRAL PARK LAND g PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN n� W SOUTH D N PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA Landscape Architecture /Land Planning/Environmental Consulting zZ 00 KO M-1 Oy r Z� rZ ;' -A Zr IJ y NZ �O Dy �C m> vm m o �. 4`3 Y R g $ 3 o ID O g 3 es S nD 9 a 33g sfl 0 n q$A � n U 0 p� T :0 I 0 s rn N �nl 'Im fn 17 �0 l z 'Iz n1 ;1 0I z �i m z Z� X111 .il l can 2 -II I D z W 2 -I1I - I — —mi I I I I,! -1_I D ' C9 ll_— iIIIII m D II — z. a =£_Z r= d� D =fo vSupm -mvn sv � :f 'a mo- ° q3 g g f " m g�F e Q m tia M. 3 Fr Qg ER Eau °3 s °3 °a $ a3 d g�v wow r Er T3 gSS� n q m m oqy, g e SX p93_ R., �" ^' A 3o v g W V2 Er K "— o E 5 R 3g y CENTRAL PARK LAND g PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN n� W SOUTH D N PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA Landscape Architecture /Land Planning/Environmental Consulting zZ 00 KO M-1 Oy r Z� rZ ;' -A Zr IJ y NZ �O Dy �C m> vm r w 0 1 0 o m > a $ o m y °> m O f1 m D O n m y Gam q o oR€ ms„ 8 a�- � �_� mN f n&� a�— 38 6— 3^ E • S'w .Z mN ba 2 m a oar .sea gR "13 gii.m _ gz 21 R ��� m gm� a R� m =� �,am �� m� am ga aas g°�m gds; " -� $ � � �1 a d a8 � �8 3•O° 3� � m �mgr�u ° o a� oI R ° 8 v 3 & 'ate $�Q g � £ g 8S � - I $a pE� �aE �' � a le a E; °u co 7 x m 3'0' y_,a C m c �g m R3 S as R a � 2- off. s �o g g c n s 3 s mR g.N 3m H3 8 a° g §a 3 Y 0 m p Y J ° 0 m y y ° ° N a m n D nD O a3- o 3 115 0 � ° a < Si a y 8. o ana o a . 0 a m a y�.2 3 3 o 3 y 3°°^ °as. c a B o z S� £ Si. � la Q °G s y 7� }� mm 9. s ��og m° H g'� om g . ,� & $m �mgx 3 S?E vZ� v - a tgm mS N ma 03 m n o.N F R a H n ,2 m S y' g— 3 g3 � N� �- g� R a a �� Pu�•m m� t'+� m $ �S ga' s. m x �". ,"„ m'c° a °SS 0s s� se Rig �$� m 3 gg 3F.$ {a� $ o ca$ @. " S R ° °' 6bt 2" $'S — 3 8 l a 3 8: m P ° " 8v g s. 'Er a^ RS m' m, g EF IL Er " 3 off' a 8$ 3H a 3 s � qdm n m Nm° n m 8 aR R a� $y� i i �s 6 R;� ' s $8$ Q � nRe Esc. $ g�a ag 2 go $ ��" I:E °E�omg 2@ '�- �- m �.^ A> R R o 6t R R& 33 �£ e ? y 3a� 6 ;a R as Fro n6 -s Rah G6 R �d i 8� 912 a R Qua £ S �y.$ y s ��*� c 5 ?1 5 3 N�y -s�'r.a g z" ° f f i ,$ a P g 6 £.�s p R; yT $ � s �@ � g¢ j6. n ° � �s a' B ERm ag�� 3� �qr �' $ i kBg `���o� ro 03 4m #A'$ @•� Fg @�i S' ���gi , 3 d n u d 3 R ib S •- 6 YYSS A s s I n g a £ £ ' �2 2$3 $° Rs m " £R� ado w %2M 1A ¢g $ jj �g z „8 LAND CENTRAL PARK ma PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS DESIGN Ua PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA SOUTH Landscape ArchitectureiLand Planning /Environmental Consulting III III III III III a lid ,II lip tI 11 m I C Z T 0 57 < vm XDO m m 0 56�yd � FNI i5� i' �-t I JooZ C5 !!oz �I= =oz I H �44 T C Z r � C N m m N m D mm m O 04� �d P a 5 ra o � �'_I •: ', ill. L� 51 � r � i-- ------- 9 o YEN, w b r CENTRAL PARK ma � tl N fJ Ib PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS a PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA r � r � El Iy t� 0 2".7 Ar O� T o YEN, w b r CENTRAL PARK ma PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS a PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA r El Iy t� 0 2".7 Ar O� • • • �m N N No jga s�3 g� CENTRAL PARK PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA yNy T 2 A LAND DESIGN SOUTH Landscape Architecture /Land Planning/Envlmnmental Consulting di5 • v ► 9 v ow- � Z -a L A N 11201200 RESUBMITTAL U 2 O O O / D A D I I N co < N In 01 (T N O > D !n N 1 D > VI r v, r D D r N (n N N N o D r o fA r O Z m A C) >1 c A n O m O O S m A 0 � = v Z cZ Z r -- Ln = r O p 2 N A Oo N M r� m O (p O rn • r N - <m N I r*1 r G 0 C) .Z7 0 C Z 0 J 4 9 a a D' CENTRAL PARK PARKING STRUCTURE FINFROCK'' NOT FOR PALM BEACH GARDENS Florida N CONSTRUCTION O FINFROCK DESIGN, INC. GROUND LEVEL P.O. Box 607754 Orlando, FL. 32860.7754 PARKING LAYOUT 407.293.4000(v) 407.297.0512(f) „ , N 11201200 RESUBMITTAL U 2 D O / D A D I I Z < N OI 01 (T I 0 O p O VI y D Dn (n v N o r m o fA O Z m A r- >1 c A n O m r A O Z D Z O = r O p C) r 4 fn A m< 2 N A Oo N m O (p O rn • N - V) I I 4 --1 N Oa X O > D X r r r Oo N (/) r O 10 - � I a O G 0 C) .Z7 0 C Z 0 J 4 9 a a D' CENTRAL PARK PARKING STRUCTURE FINFROCK'' NOT FOR PALM BEACH GARDENS Florida N CONSTRUCTION O FINFROCK DESIGN, INC. GROUND LEVEL P.O. Box 607754 Orlando, FL. 32860.7754 PARKING LAYOUT 407.293.4000(v) 407.297.0512(f) „ , 11201200 RESUBMITTAL 911005 REV. DESIGN D RESUBMITTAL 61i01200 REV. DESIGN Q m0 DESIGN REVIEW � ' I I I• N OI 01 (T I 0 D (n r m o O Z m A r- >1 c A n O m r A O Z c Z O = r O p C) 4 m m m< 2 f� nr rn G 0 C) .Z7 0 C Z 0 J 4 9 a a D' CENTRAL PARK PARKING STRUCTURE FINFROCK'' NOT FOR PALM BEACH GARDENS Florida N CONSTRUCTION O FINFROCK DESIGN, INC. GROUND LEVEL P.O. Box 607754 Orlando, FL. 32860.7754 PARKING LAYOUT 407.293.4000(v) 407.297.0512(f) „ , O u re- IM `o e re `— 2 moo ADD PASS -THRU 1 'NI-5 ADD WINDOWS TO CORNERS [.-I DATE I REVISION 11201200 RESUBMITTAL 911005 REV. DESIGN 711005 RESUBMITTAL 61i01200 REV. DESIGN Q m0 DESIGN REVIEW DATE F ISSUED FOR O u re- IM `o e re `— 2 moo ADD PASS -THRU 1 'NI-5 ADD WINDOWS TO CORNERS [.-I DATE I REVISION +aeaao RESUBMITTAL wtaaas REV. DESIGN n+aoos RESUBMITTAL w CENTRAL PARK PARKING STRUCTURE NOT FOR PALM BEACH GARDENS Florida CONSTRUCTION SECOND LEVEL PARKING LAYOUT taaoo REV. DESIGN userzoo DESIGN REVIEW DATE ISSUED FOR 1 enrsoos ADD WINDOWS AT CORNERS REV DATE REVISION FINFROCK FINFROCK DESIGN, INC. O N P O. Box 607754 Orlando, FL. 32860 -7754 407.293.4000(v) 407.297.0512(0 I ■ I ■ I I Q Q ■ I 4 ■ ® I ■ I ■ ■ I Iz6._.. I ■ ■ ■ I I ■ ■ ■ I ■ ■ I ■ ■ I I 62, -6, 62,_6. O � DA N O N (� STAN RD 5T LL$ e 9 O (A to Dw 7--4L-2-4 co �. N L In I vt ul � N cn D O r =r 0 O O M = N m o° c" A O O l f f S o Z z z Iv N o 1 m p p A 0 m N r r' r m r- � m (DRI WAY) o O N r � m ^ r m r N S 0 O --1 D p D (DRIVEWAY) o oz n y z I F n D D O D D A O D Z 0 u > r (n > y > D D D 6. D N m I u C A 0 Q to N O1 I N N /� -6 L IIpp Fn r O 1 to > D r � I O O I O 3 0 A tt ° r N N r, (A 9 p 10 B I N 0 s � N N Cn N N N 00 Q V V Q1 N m 0 m Do m O U) m U �- O O A S O m A r Z O = r5 Z O Z p ° z m �'1 r m mCC = STAND RD ST LLS m m P N A 0 A N D D +aeaao RESUBMITTAL wtaaas REV. DESIGN n+aoos RESUBMITTAL w CENTRAL PARK PARKING STRUCTURE NOT FOR PALM BEACH GARDENS Florida CONSTRUCTION SECOND LEVEL PARKING LAYOUT taaoo REV. DESIGN userzoo DESIGN REVIEW DATE ISSUED FOR 1 enrsoos ADD WINDOWS AT CORNERS REV DATE REVISION FINFROCK FINFROCK DESIGN, INC. O N P O. Box 607754 Orlando, FL. 32860 -7754 407.293.4000(v) 407.297.0512(0 +aeaao RESUBMITTAL wtaaas REV. DESIGN n+aoos RESUBMITTAL w CENTRAL PARK PARKING STRUCTURE NOT FOR PALM BEACH GARDENS Florida CONSTRUCTION SECOND LEVEL PARKING LAYOUT taaoo REV. DESIGN userzoo DESIGN REVIEW DATE ISSUED FOR 1 enrsoos ADD WINDOWS AT CORNERS REV DATE REVISION I ■ I ■ I I ■ I I ■ ■ ® I ■ I ■ ■ I I ■ ■ ■ I I ■ ■ ■ I ■ ■ I ■ ■ I I CENTRAL PARK PARKING STRUCTURE NOT FOR PALM BEACH GARDENS Florida CONSTRUCTION SECOND LEVEL PARKING LAYOUT taaoo REV. DESIGN userzoo DESIGN REVIEW DATE ISSUED FOR 1 enrsoos ADD WINDOWS AT CORNERS REV DATE REVISION 1 enrsoos ADD WINDOWS AT CORNERS REV DATE REVISION +aenoo RESUBMITTAL srtaoos REV. DESIGN maoos RESUBMITTAL s/+aaoo REV. DESIGN 4 D FINFROCK NOT FOR CENTRAL PARK PARKING STRUCTURE IV PALM BEACH GARDENS Florida 0 FINFROCK DESIGN, INC. CONSTRUCTION THIRD LEVEL P.O. Box 607754 Orlando, FL. 32860.7754 PARKING LAYOUT 407.293.4000(v) 407.297.0512(f) DESIGN REVIEW 1 tu+aaos ADD WINDOWS AT CORNERS DATE ISSUED FOR REV DATE REVISION z 62 _6. r -e 62•_6. I � I I I , D ® I I I I 1 D a I u STAN RD ST LLS 9 a I LO W !b -� Ca _ fo I -4 N D D -1011- 0 0 r 0= c Z A m A 0 O Z O O C fV Cnl In = r O OZ —1 O S. D r r m r r r r'1 m r•t r F = 26 -0" (DRI WAY) z y I Q y y o O m m v N -I O N Z 2 O O N 2 Z r� Z O D N N 26._D. (DRIVEWAY) S O rD O O n > p C"I ul O r- N e �. r N r r � r r In y r r r r D D F— P O l0 O 0 O � N p O? I N I N (n 9 Fn N D r W D O I O z ' p r r N r- N 0 1 m O i • W Qo � V p� N m - t0 co N al n u N N 1. I. 1 4 c N s Di cr OI c m VI N N 0 0 :r' 41 o r m r o (n A = r O Z C r O p z o 1 D Z M < r*1 r r r*1 m M r f+'I r r 2 STAND RD STILLS m 9 A D D +aenoo RESUBMITTAL srtaoos REV. DESIGN maoos RESUBMITTAL s/+aaoo REV. DESIGN 4 D FINFROCK NOT FOR CENTRAL PARK PARKING STRUCTURE IV PALM BEACH GARDENS Florida 0 FINFROCK DESIGN, INC. CONSTRUCTION THIRD LEVEL P.O. Box 607754 Orlando, FL. 32860.7754 PARKING LAYOUT 407.293.4000(v) 407.297.0512(f) DESIGN REVIEW 1 tu+aaos ADD WINDOWS AT CORNERS DATE ISSUED FOR REV DATE REVISION I I I I , , ® I I I I I I I I D FINFROCK NOT FOR CENTRAL PARK PARKING STRUCTURE IV PALM BEACH GARDENS Florida 0 FINFROCK DESIGN, INC. CONSTRUCTION THIRD LEVEL P.O. Box 607754 Orlando, FL. 32860.7754 PARKING LAYOUT 407.293.4000(v) 407.297.0512(f) DESIGN REVIEW 1 tu+aaos ADD WINDOWS AT CORNERS DATE ISSUED FOR REV DATE REVISION A V) vz O to 2 Nfl O Ln D N Q t0 0000 V V Ib << N N C N Z O > O D r D 0 u 1 N Lo r D D D (n N r N �P N O r Lo cn D r 0 0 0 D r D D C7 r p Z C O O O 2 m A r O m r A O Z CO Z z IN 0 O N N 2 r p pZp ---I a) I' N N N y 1 to O x O D D > r I 1 11 9 -1 O � C a � —I a 2 I r— r m r- 0 C —1 Q Q Qj 129' -0" to �V -0' 4. -0' 6I' -6' A L A O A N NOT FOR CENTRAL PARK PARKING STRUCTURE PALM BEACH GARDENS Florida CONSTRUCTION FOURTH LEVEL PARKING LAYOUT V) vz O to 2 Nfl O Ln D N Q to 0o O V V m << Z 2 C > Z O frl O D D D O t7 N D In D O N O r m 0 0 0 D m D D r p Z C Z O = r O p r V) m Z) A A m = z IN 0 O N t0 r m 10 O a) I' N N N y 1 to O x O D D > r r r 00 Vl O I O O I 1 11 9 -1 O � C a � —I a 2 I r— r m r- 0 C —1 Q Q Qj 129' -0" to �V -0' 4. -0' 6I' -6' A L A O A N NOT FOR CENTRAL PARK PARKING STRUCTURE PALM BEACH GARDENS Florida CONSTRUCTION FOURTH LEVEL PARKING LAYOUT vz D SIM2005 FINFROCK Nfl Ut Ln Ut N Q to 0o O V V m — N cr C T W < t m D In r m 0 0 0 o m r p Z C Z O = r O p V) m r m = z r� r r m I 1 11 9 -1 O � C a � —I a 2 I r— r m r- 0 C —1 Q Q Qj 129' -0" to �V -0' 4. -0' 6I' -6' A L A O A N NOT FOR CENTRAL PARK PARKING STRUCTURE PALM BEACH GARDENS Florida CONSTRUCTION FOURTH LEVEL PARKING LAYOUT vz D SIM2005 FINFROCK Nfl t� atar2.0 FINFROCK DESIGN, INC. 0-1- DESIGN REVIEW DATE I ISSUED FO P.O. Box 607754 Orlando, FL. 32860 -7754 4 407.293.4000(v) 407.297.0512(1) I 1 11 9 -1 O � C a � —I a 2 I r— r m r- 0 C —1 Q Q Qj 129' -0" to �V -0' 4. -0' 6I' -6' A L A O A N NOT FOR CENTRAL PARK PARKING STRUCTURE PALM BEACH GARDENS Florida CONSTRUCTION FOURTH LEVEL PARKING LAYOUT S 0 -I-@ I b 0 /1 m 0 f O 0 t J taco ADD PASS -THRU REV DATE REVISION vz RESUBMITTAL SIM2005 REV. DESIGN rnn0D5 RESUBMITTAL atar2.0 REV. DESIGN 41211.5 DESIGN REVIEW DATE I ISSUED FO S 0 -I-@ I b 0 /1 m 0 f O 0 t J taco ADD PASS -THRU REV DATE REVISION - U) y� o m yob xw -� m La O 70 m r m D --I O Z j I i� 'F y� IF pF 7 ag R r N ,r a V A o � o m X m 0 O Hm � r m D O Z N� �A fq T [f 5 V -D, N r N y _D. 1 N 3 N QG ; �P�t i oil RESUBMITTAL as N� �A fq T [f 5 V -D, N r N y _D. 1 N 3 QG ; �P�t i oil RESUBMITTAL as at N D I N F R ®C K NOT FOR CENTRAL PARK PARKING STRUCTURE N e� PALM BEACH GARDENS Florida N CONSTRUCTION C) .g FINFROCK DESIGN, INC. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS P.O. Box 607754 Orlando, FL. 32860 -7754 F 407.293.4000(v) 407.297.0512(!) . . 1/2u200 i 7112005 RESUBMITTAL 9112005 H N N DATE N �A D I N F R ®C K NOT FOR CENTRAL PARK PARKING STRUCTURE N e� PALM BEACH GARDENS Florida N CONSTRUCTION C) .g FINFROCK DESIGN, INC. EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS P.O. Box 607754 Orlando, FL. 32860 -7754 F 407.293.4000(v) 407.297.0512(!) . . 4--0. -s r -o• o' -e• 5' -D' 45-0, 3 +12&200 ADD WINDOW DETAILS 2 M7200 ADD WINDOW DETAILS 1 91'200s ADD WINDOWS AT CORNERS REV DATE REVISION 1/2u200 RESUBMITTAL 7112005 RESUBMITTAL 9112005 RESUBMITTAL V25005 DESIGN REVIEW DATE I ISSUED FOR 4--0. -s r -o• o' -e• 5' -D' 45-0, 3 +12&200 ADD WINDOW DETAILS 2 M7200 ADD WINDOW DETAILS 1 91'200s ADD WINDOWS AT CORNERS REV DATE REVISION F] m X O z m r m D O z r m m m m D O z 0 0 v Z I `"' Ib u iag g3� �S D "D m r -X1r n 0 0 v Z I `"' 1 d I gigg iag g3� �S D "D m r r m T m r m D O z V m r m D O z Y' Y IR ail .x I � lryI o m 41 w D r -1 W WD OrO�rr D "D m r -X1r - CE) r Orr r m U >() O O�mO mrn Cj�mz z =zI m OF PAMLBEACH GARDENS, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA zc%� -1 cAD Dodo o m z �D DDDOO O� -A mok �o r C Li Z o mpWm W D mz cn X O -1 0NOx -n > D O 0x m z 0 �J O G� m - -I m D� D {D D $ &O H" Z '� ��zC) O' �0 0 0z X o 0Z :z r- o- o O 0 (p cnn z Mco -nc o X- 0� �D � c) �—'OD� �A 0) �o wr=�J= ;u �D W� 0� U'm0 �o � OD N N rn _ m Po D m coo = ;7 cn m Om W al0 Z nx� zcn mmz O cn cn0 X00 0 o Lo G) m X W r �_ ) 00 10 OF X z 4 z r in cn CC G = R° O r W D z O m K U) o m CENTRAL PARK m o " Q U >() O GAURDHOUSE THE CITY #� g O z ea 6 S > m v"', OF PAMLBEACH GARDENS, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA kop r q g cn yFe! BY EB.DEVELOPERS n IN n4D, PC Z 0 A N N D. CENTRAL PARK �� rO�m� n Z NC�COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS r-;u D cp s o I Ej () PALM BEACH GARDENS D X 0 r`e n PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Ill. a ° Q$. XjqqXj 4J t� F�9 40 • 90 z 0 n ZMOn O Z v r °a CENTRAL PARK > d' COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS ' o I � PALM BEACH GARDENS 5' 2pAo PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA gal N MCI BY: E.B. DEVELOPMENT ,ail, ' O - 0 �' OF m3 i O m O A C-) O P O O m M O f6(m'i o gC r (n O 71 Z O D ,4o .'oak • 4 m �' 0 „O Z v r O O r t, V � m X y 4 r- 8 8 XZ 0 NO, up, O 00 00 a C °a CENTRAL PARK a COMMERCIAL S n Z F.3 ��� BUILDINGs N8 Z SZ _ O PALM BEACH GARDENS =� FvV g > PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA w D I�m� z m BY: E.B. DEVELOPMENT sti ° -u T cc co a° CENTRAL PARK 8 8 g a 8 m c w COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS m F m O PLr� o I () PALM BEACH GARDENS yy 9 "sg �� =`O PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA m W BY. E B. DEVELOPMENT rP 0 0 0, m 0 .-o Z 71 r- 00 0 - ------------------------- w Dr U) T "u -u C co - r- tw CENTRAL PARK o > Fl. 11 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS Z 0 PALM BEACH GARDENS if, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA > cn m 6K° I I BY: E B. DEVELOPMENT I Q J?,e E, I El up, • of m °m �n O :z :o TI r- 0 O r D z U) spill "Irl r- C f °a CENTRAL PARK g g o a g o z o�� > I COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS; o f K Z � , PALM BEACH GARDENS "m a Fvu D8W y�Z�C) PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 'm G7 BY E B. DEVELOPMENT �', S 0 C m r, m O z Go C r, 0 z Q E CL 0 0 K :16 4 m U) M r- m BI 0 z Cal c F: FEH pp tli rl M M m 0 z Do O z 0 millmoc:Imi -gel gCal ml r-@ r— M] CENTRAL PARK COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS 0 z G) F, o I n PALM BEACH GARDENS PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA > z 77 cf) I rl M M m 0 z Do O z 0 millmoc:Imi IN z 0 m r, m 0 II z co C r- 0 z G) 0 -gel I IN z 0 m r, m 0 II z co C r- 0 z G) 0 -gel �t 6 EE �D w � 4 m a 0 z C13 c r 0 z 0 c • ow A y t$ 4m D 0 z v z G) G) I 4 -4 a Mm c 6 ae G) -00, G) co m a � m c <� _ °a CENTRAL PARK a Q � m � n PO F m W COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS > � m m $ O D o I n PALM BEACH GARDENS xaR DOe >I = SO PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA co cnZ NI "rte H T F BY, E.B. DEVELOPMENT is r r� 4 4 r rrD_ C 2 a c G 2 C X c a c 4l F, m �cn M mr D O z w C r- 0 z O rn 0 9 I i I I c� c m'- °_a CENTRAL PARK $� $ p m COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS C7 O p 9. D m z€ e C7� o ( 1 5' 2 0 PALM BEACH GARDENS PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA m g g 5 k99 D O e U) co cl) N m aS $ BY. E.B. DEVELOPMENT 0 0 Of C) O r- 0 X D M n Rl D 2 D m 7 D T1 A .7 D J Z iii m � 4 D r co 07 m m r m r m D t -u U^ ) v m m m -1R a N MGN FNF HpSMr - _ Z D ivi �B A� 4 k m r I e O °a. CENTRAL PARK COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS sg� & 11 T I I I I I I I I i i i i C) O r- 0 X D M n Rl D 2 D m 7 D T1 A .7 D J Z iii m � 4 D r co 07 m m r m r m D t -u U^ ) v m m m -1R a N MGN FNF HpSMr - _ Z D ivi �B A� 4 k -T O Z -i m �l r O Z 0 � k i N u a r co C m r m I I I� 91m s� -0k' 9 93 f0 k d 4 D r W C W m O m Z c�I z 0 ti = w� m r m D 1 O Z Go w c s 0 m G N rM °z z�cc =m�� pOWE 1rr m� vzm � —mr m 2 OD(mnM m;z= <�pp mnu�n mz�� 20mz Woo> zm- Oz,o x226 >,,.2T C 0 -> m 2 D Dcon O mow. oomr- 1mz >CniM 0c >=>m xvCO ZA�1 rDl—� x r Z r r OCCmD fnp [DD PU mm� a;�0r ZOmx .mp ZOgm p.ZOG)p m xD ?� Ammo C�g m�0o wmmpm ME 00%% Dy DC �t�»� azm Zr-0 �mm <Tv 20 x� om mG) 0 p zz i r z z , )C) ADO m 1 .0 ZG) Z�m om� 0 - �Fei cNiz�zz mp �-°�5 xzzI wvm cz)0p "off Oz <xm TOE cmT Mmg Oc' x c rn yMp mo_ G02 m? yZ D -2 c= c� z2 LX 3 6m= �m m -q T X (J) C Z Z O D 2 Z X '0 v0 m mr z Z G) m r I e O °a. CENTRAL PARK COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS sg� & 11 Di' € I ;00 L p z D #t a Z I -T O Z -i m �l r O Z 0 � k i N u a r co C m r m I I I� 91m s� -0k' 9 93 f0 k d 4 D r W C W m O m Z c�I z 0 ti = w� m r m D 1 O Z Go w c s 0 m G N rM °z z�cc =m�� pOWE 1rr m� vzm � —mr m 2 OD(mnM m;z= <�pp mnu�n mz�� 20mz Woo> zm- Oz,o x226 >,,.2T C 0 -> m 2 D Dcon O mow. oomr- 1mz >CniM 0c >=>m xvCO ZA�1 rDl—� x r Z r r OCCmD fnp [DD PU mm� a;�0r ZOmx .mp ZOgm p.ZOG)p m xD ?� Ammo C�g m�0o wmmpm ME 00%% Dy DC �t�»� azm Zr-0 �mm <Tv 20 x� om mG) 0 p zz i r z z , )C) ADO m 1 .0 ZG) Z�m om� 0 - �Fei cNiz�zz mp �-°�5 xzzI wvm cz)0p "off Oz <xm TOE cmT Mmg Oc' x c rn yMp mo_ G02 m? yZ D -2 c= c� z2 LX 3 6m= �m m -q T X (J) C Z Z O D 2 Z X '0 v0 m mr z Z G) C ro e �' °a. CENTRAL PARK COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS sg� & 0 Di' € rr o I (; L p z PALM BEACH GARDENS PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA I a mom N q C) m m BY: E.B. DEVELOPMENT „y 7ƒ 7 77 = 7 CENTRALPARK CLUB HOUSE o ƒ @ z ?I }t § g z § � f ))$ 7 . / / ■§ |� FMB 2 mamma FLORIDA .. / \ k \ by: E&DEVELOPERS 7ƒ 7 77 = 7 CENTRALPARK CLUB HOUSE o ƒ @ z ?I }t § g z VILLAGE c r f CITY 7 . / / ■§ |� FMB 2 mamma FLORIDA .. / \ by: E&DEVELOPERS • m �m � a Qd °aw o (M) a VILLAGE CENTER 2 D O Tl Z xx CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PALM BEACH tJ COUNTY, FLORIDA Z • ei °a CENTRAL PARK CLUB HOUSE Qd °aw o > o� D� N I a VILLAGE CENTER omm a n =MO CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PALM BEACH �� COUNTY, FLORIDA by: E B. DEVELOPERS INC. \ w m � 0 z \ \) T ( , � � ■ | ( \ / / \ f9¥f 2> r 3 \/ \ƒ7© om z @cn @> 02 r G)Z0 \2 ®_ /cc\ 0 I@G> «> I z0 oz /§ \j me @3G> ®j \ %@ ?m § \ %o ® ƒ\ /0 \� S epo \\ _¥ § § f § Co / \/ / 0/ m ? >nG » /o $ b\ \0 0 E; z \ � / \ ? \ m m IX0H -n ¥0 .. Z m Z' UD / = r @ m � 0 >�7 q '* > r- 0 0 ® 0 z omc0 § ._ c\ a: \ k\ m§ F \ k \ m o > r-I 2 R \ / o - 0 /7/ m /f % q$0 ®\ $ >\ k \> \ _ \ e z F =O W \ / \0 _ \ 90 0 E > � cn \ E \ z } ƒ ( \ ( w � � � � ` U Pm § 2 m _ } CENTRAL PARK CLUB HOUSE `vim w!!!;7 .4f ` Kok > o( ! Ec r a GARDENS > \ | /i /\ \ CITY a� ,� PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA / / |E j�� `/ \® by E B. DEVELOPERS INC. t( 10 0 W r i m m r D —i 2 IS ,i IS Ib 4' X m r m a O Z I � m7 ° 2 � CENTRAL PARK CLUB HOUSE -g s (7 < —i ° r N Y Cn I VILLAGE CENTER x D Z O 0 by: E.B. DEVELOPERS INC. 1 ` ° � m7 ° 2 � CENTRAL PARK CLUB HOUSE -g s (7 < —i ° r N Y Cn I VILLAGE CENTER x D Z O 0 "s o Cl y iz M CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA» f cn by: E.B. DEVELOPERS INC. 1 ` ° 0 0• - f» E O2 27 \) § 2 n w \ , |! ! Q « 16UNIT CONDOM auV BUILDING \ ,. | ■i : 7 OR (() vs ac S | 7\\ § �- § , ! «, k f» E O2 27 \) \($22! 4! w \ , |! ! Q « 16UNIT CONDOM auV BUILDING \ ,. | ■i : 7 OR (() vs ac S f ƒ'| � ■|} § |��@ �- § \ k ( {! E\§ \k BY: E£DEVELOPMENT j f» E O2 2 ®§ 7 \($22! 4! �- \ o} , |! ! Q « 16UNIT CONDOM auV BUILDING \ ,. | ■i : 7 OR (() vs ac S f ƒ'| � ■|} § |��@ J / \ k ( {! E\§ \k BY: E£DEVELOPMENT j ® f» E O2 3 CENTRALS RK \($22! 4! �- \ o} , |! ! Q « 16UNIT CONDOM auV BUILDING \ ,. | ■i : 7 ! §@$y/ vs ac S f ƒ'| � ■|} § |��@ PALM BEACH ma7 FLORIDA § { „! \ � }• BY: E£DEVELOPMENT • 0 W - c z ci c z c z c z c z c z D -n cn ^' m n O m > CENTRAL PARK 6 UNIT CONDOMINUM BUILDING ol 17 z -V p Oa'f� �g i� g' o f f 998 PALM BEACH GARDENS d PALM BEACH Ir0 COUNTY, FLORIDA m f 4 1} y " rm O z rri BY E.B. DEVELOPMENT � 0 0 0. 1 C Z T C Z C Z i C Z 1 '1 ° D ^ -n -+ CENTRAL PARK w m p= a' 6 UNIT CONDOMINUM BUILDING m m$ ,Z0j 0 o I C PALM BEACH GARDENS FE If j v _ ^ R' 2 t"---jjj 0 PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA { y € 4 FRI BY: E.B. DEVELOPMENT • • •. U) ^ -0 T X D D 0Om Z N U� °a CENTRAL PARK 6 UNIT CONDOMINUM BUILDING 8 m ° m m' $ PALM BEACH GARDENS PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA x� m 4 � AA a fg y BY E B DEVELOPMENT m • •. ' 1 0 d a� d 3 lit A :P w - - m r 0 0 C� �7 � r 0 r r—>>0 m Oz C'n cn D >DOO O� Z p D m0co m mF m r- xm -z z p 0�] 0 0 ( � D -< D 0 cn0 X0 O m ? O C � U) Co O M co Ncoo U) f m 0 ow 0 Mz mcn mm z0 C cn cn N -N r G) 2 Z O O O CD Do ;D > O> r D r � r- m m�mz Z C) D m np-Io p �> Z � D O O m D mp� cnm 0 im0 X 00 O m m nab? umi 0 z K z oZ z O (n 0 O - r � ---I ja - 0 t =� 0 ca��2 X mp =90DO y� U) c m p 2 2 cn � m 0- O D G7 zU Co i m p cn D 2 (nD� c' D r U, r U) _ 0 F co w Z 0 � °' 0 90 O m D U) Il�l�f 11 a ii it ■■■■) lI ■ ��lu� Ili � I �U '�1 � iMV� to; MM caY,Mi ° D m r > °a. CENTRAL PARK 6 UNIT CONDOMINUM BUILDING g a ` I o 0 99 2R)=: 0 PALM BEACH GARDENS PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA BY:E B. DEVELOPMENT m g r � 9 _ °a 10 UNIT CONDOMINUM BUILDING X O p� � � � � �°'� � CENTRAL PARK m Z x o/I n PALM BEACH GARDENS & $ D -u p aW > F" m fir^ O PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA • 0 T • c z ; 1 t m c z q m c z 1 D C Z 1 D C Z 4 1 Ell c z m m @ a 10 UNIT CONDOMINUM BUILDING m N p�� I CENTRAL PARK s om3. X ZO a o (i PALM BEACH GARDENS am ! D PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA x � m `) q e 0 >) g k.# !) ,} § z) Q .# !) R � 0 §.q 10 UNIT CONDONwUVBUILDING f 0 ?a i§ ! Q �� ±CENTRAL PARK \ @ Xx �/ G r e �$\ PALM BEACH GARDENS c - /I� ova amu�.�Rm z ..... . 0 0 0% �| qE _ )10 UNIT CONDOMNUM BUILDING \ 0. ! ! Q # CENTRAL PARK $ | « §`| G� « e § kq/ k� a �v & RLAMs amu,FOEgA a / o\�� ; k §} O z IM D O z 9 i • • 1 �. 6 va , ma Z7 r� < IT! T F� D 0 I o cn I p �a III I t 1 1 1 1 1 1 a D f i l l , ,� O z 4 � •1 � � i � � j 'A 9 °a 10 UNIT CONDOMINUM BUILDING N CENTRAL PARK o I Ci PALM BEACH GARDENS PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA H BY. E.B. DEVELOPMENT III�— i ��,■■, �' ■..■ � ' uo it Monw F� Won iiwn, iii HE i■ul INS■ �iil ■■■■ ■■■■ OMMO t I I■■■I ■■■■ ■■■■ ■ ■I M.C. I,uiil I, ii * ■�i � =iii ��iii■ II�� � ;III ■�, � _ �' —If■I � lid ■■,■� • t KNEW N 5 . -' o (3 WD °ODF D OD a� �F D p> D o m m m z z 0 C) D (n 0 D n 0 0 m rDDO O Ttp m G)OZO am) �m0� 0NX� m �0 00 m0°�m Z m �� ZpO� zn OD moo�� O 0��� no 0z�z r 0 p p �m r OC X- O _ -< �' N D a) 0� w X m ;o p 0 �� 0 �� r- �=D m X00 w OD m p0 90DO m 0 2 2(p m 0- m m m z(? � z cn co OZm po p (n , 00 Ro m Z 0 4 � •1 � � i � � j 'A 9 °a 10 UNIT CONDOMINUM BUILDING N CENTRAL PARK o I Ci PALM BEACH GARDENS PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA H BY. E.B. DEVELOPMENT III�— i ��,■■, �' ■..■ � ' uo it Monw F� Won iiwn, iii HE i■ul INS■ �iil ■■■■ ■■■■ OMMO t I I■■■I ■■■■ ■■■■ ■ ■I M.C. I,uiil I, ii * ■�i � =iii ��iii■ II�� � ;III ■�, � _ �' —If■I � lid ■■,■� • t KNEW N 5 . -' o (3 m a a� b g • . • I I I I H r § o T Z o z . o me z s €� cc zz CD 1 0 4 4 OZ c C 11 T T T T T T it T ti y' 4 C s o° ° co Zz Fr 0 =z o� T ;Z Z= i O � mn how pp cz z w + c m m ii i'ii n r z TJ I I I I H r § o T Z o z . s €� z CD ° r-- a° CENTRAL PARK 8 0 0j. �°'� 14 UNIT CONDOMINIUM BUILDING a = a Z o I cn C� PALM BEACH GARDENS k� PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA w Z I m-I m BY: E.B. DEVELOPMENT • 0 A 0 % a� a a II It a D m @ N O 0 C� I °a CENTRAL PARK a 14 UNIT CONDOMINIUM BUILDING 0� "� g g o O�( ) s r) ��_n�0{ PALM BEACH GARDENS PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 8 i g R Z .o P BY: E.B. DEVELOPMENT 0 . � , �\ \ , , � 4 ; \� � I � 4\ yf �2 =E CENTRAL PARK 14 $ �R2! -■ ©|!\ \ §} i! ; g UNIT CONDOMINIUM BUILDING \ 2 \ °. X, |/ ;�7 e evBEACH GARDENS | / PALM BEACH mamma m> i 0 D $ ;u 41 0 H I p�cn r- °R'z o Z N Fp °a CENTRAL PARK 14 UNIT CONDOMINIUM BUILDING g PALM BEACH GARDENS PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA it W � 5' � �s 4 I V I J I a� F Ra " JI a a F a i � Y r i V I I I Bill e �r I V V l i II f a a4� x 41WN)� q qty W W07 D O OD m m nnn� � �� O wm T T G) D D OZ�� � �D n np�O p p L L�'� Z Z Dn 0 r r w w h O O O m m> O O G)r Zp c c? f fnTJ0 - -n p p I IT pom m 0 m pNm m � co nZ 0 mco m m D zD n p O 0z�z m O Z Z p - -nc X p O O r r O MOD p -i � c cn O : C m :E pm = =r =m m m p pO O m p po>m D _ D� co m p _ m m m G G) T W W X� 0 0ch U U7 D D> m m m� m miZ � ��? c cn ZO u u�impp o o � �V) m m cn � >� ° ° cn � t OD 0 r (!� tJ z Z 4 C C/) W O w� 2 R R° O O D z K K G) c cn M. °a CENTRALPARK N `gg °mom da m 14 UNIT CONDOMINIUM BUILDING s o s f m < n PALM BEACH GARDENS 4 F =T O PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA OZ m I ( m o o Y fn G:\2005-Projefo5-120 La Miraposa - EB Developers \CAD - PHOTOMETRIC Dwgs020P_12- 20- 05.dwg, 1/8/2006 3:55:23 PM, \ \server \HP LaserJet is Series PC o� 0 D > N D N + ° u4 q N U) f,!) D Z O n >lr1� A< �^m p D 0 z + E] os Dr A< �"m O 9 S + r < m O V a x G)i + � ck � Dr1r� D< Z -1 n + ��a D U) -� (!) -0 A �_ Z ADD �� O N v nQ < V ° z N m y + NO ° Z 9 z >a N O O ° + a a ° _ N 3 kf U) D 1 U) v m M V) O D D > m > Z D < m q 'O m JC N S 8_ m R R n N G) s r m O C] W > D m R u R P U) R R R R R R R n n R R A U) D = m m 0 x m o m w m m m N °< N m m M m or O or y° m£ d o r— K� m� x in x 0 "s c m eN m C) K m° Y' S' 9° Er $ m 10 $ m $ os D N iS S 5 D D D 3 m m Y J . 3 2 < 2 y Y m a Y I p rr a m 0 9 OD C �r-- O 9 D L D O m Z N m 0 O y Q y D �C N 2 2 0; D m O— O D 0 S m C r x O Z C " O A m A S D a O Z D r-O� y N_ m D �N p m 5 y m y N m m y m 0 5 O y m—yi t>n m O m y O y cn D In r 5 9> D U) ym m A s D n o y< m O m y m m A C A m y y n N m— y Z r L)mNZNmO O Z r yC 0 D y r Q ; O> p O m -1 r D Z m< a () m— r Cr A 3 ADDmm m< p m— r Cr A; D.mDTm S :U yL y m �t°n2 m m y m °p S' U) T m z N A < m Z m Z S- AOr m p y y 0 A D y 2 L) y y m 0> O D ; Z z w 2 O mTm m° y S15mm 0 A D y p, N y O D Dm D N N O a m D -1 C,;„A9 O m0(1 O D A m N m N C3pr 00m+()8 Nnr°m�C tan r-Dmni;� D hr O A f m20 r� D C mA� ODnO 0 Cmprr� OODD" Q0D�° Z L) D n C> O A A m T y y z r° m Z D NS Dr Z D O N y y— r y y y m T r y N my r y y m z D y-i DZ C) O C n N N m °O > m r m D ,y A < r A O �Z p y Q D < ° y Q ° y 9 C < D o r M ti m M co - — Dmry zm g pD `d 3 -UG > 3 o o m m f J - 3 D O Z r w n y m 0 D ? y y I D D > m r 9 Z m rr � m D D O r rn m O c 1 91 m �' Ili N T mi v N w y1 w < m N w N in N T N T N rn N N rn L N m rh N N g $ G p oo o p $ g S o ✓wa ,yn O Ni m C D n, A p nJ m y° + 0 D > N D N + ° u4 q N U) f,!) D Z O n >lr1� A< �^m p D 0 z + D rt r D< �"m rn 2 y + D 1 A< �"m pyp D p z + Dr A< �"m O 9 S + r < m O V a x G)i + < m D N 0 A + < m D N 0 A + < m N o A + Dr1r� D< Z -1 n + O _ N 3 D U) -� (!) -0 A �_ Z ADD �� O N v nQ < V ° z N m y + NO ° Z 9 z >a N O O ° + D 9 T O v>a y A Z v x N + m m C INII A + ° _ N 3 kf U) D 1 U) v m M V) O o- > m > Z v R R v M v M R R n R R R R n n - n - n - n R Dv z G1 R u R m Z R R R R R R R n n R R R D r D� X cn w r, w U, M D z s � D D D Z 0'''t ft It O O DRAWINGS FOR: Brannon Y fa anyPamoaewn;�nregaxa :rna &Gillespie.f.rc .o ongin.f signafwe and raised seal v SITE PLAN APPROVAL Consulting Engineers K L' 1 J o > of the engineer unless fhe ongmaf Leo L d R m N signature and raised seen are CENTRAL PARK b o '6. erexed. Drawings not signed and DANNY P. BRANNON, P.E. 1 sealed by Ne engineer sn0 not he FLORIDA P.E NO. 25601 fz7y8 W. Forest Hill Blvd., Suite toz ,,gp 1—r $ o _b-ft m any surhonty or geed Wellington, Florida 334M-4704 78 for any purpose where agned and pA� CENTRAL BLVD PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA (561) 795- -833 CA, 678q m as on .ro H m m N I 1 0 0 o O Z w 4 T These DmmngsamNOTVALID D 4 4 as on .ro H m m N I 1 0 0 o O Z w G: \2005- ProjeOr-120 La Miraposa - EB Developers \CAD- PHOTOMETRIC Dwgs020P_12- 20- 05.dwg, 1/8/2006 4:48:12 PM, \ \server \HP LaserJet 0 Series PC A p r_A a i fr m ImOcn I rneeaDn nryesareNOrvRUO T h any "'" 'nay a me CD m� ma DO D�Z �'i� I co>m i mD < ~ °mom Nm°� I > 03 D I ° m° mnZjI/N N N j U'zI, ��m Dz0 z -(cn ),m CD _ �I c _ m 3x II 0� cn000 Z r✓m)z" °rn_ °z f I lTc)� imz; moms 0'� IDmI co X Cep Uxr) cnz 1°fta a mE:70 C�O Wz m = C "Ti cn C �� C7 ° o 0 n J v zC or—= �1 T) 0 N G) $ ro Z ZJ z0-0 mm z 0 >Z 2C n>w °o c 7 r� c r- N G) 0 mN T '07 m cn m m0 vin I— w z =i m0 nor V I 0 DCOCn DO FLORIDA P.E. NO. 25801 -AL sawD O 0 me C m m 0 c 0710 zp �� C) r— C C c� X0 cr mm0 „y o cmZ-n rnm c Q O1E s Om pr vc �- - o� m D D rw anyporyos w .go.d.nd DATE CENTRAL BLVD PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA (561)795o833 CA- 678q T lo V �C�.. be 6 •o I ro ro ��. m S mr °—'gin - - -- MAIN TAIN MINIrMUM 4 FEET SPACINLINE. ^ - � tE BASE AND'WATER l 1 BETWEEN P L _ {1rI.._ '0 — `OHW ON .I I Nr t� Nw I ; I VON IM T' f 4 mm ��j •'�. r_A a i fr m ImOcn I rneeaDn nryesareNOrvRUO T h any "'" 'nay a me CD °C�pI I r > DO D�Z �'i� I co>m i mD < ~ _...._ o • I > 03 D I ° m° mnZjI/N N N j DZD Z C) Z 1,1 O w z CD Im �m� mmm I II DMZ mm� N c� �m� rZ� Z -0 ~" °rn_ °z f I lTc)� imz; moms IDmI V > U, DX Consulting Engineers a cl) mu, ' I m �� C'7 min oI o g v zC or—= �1 Q $ ro a D s,rature aed.—d :ear are Bre=ed. Drawings eor .vgnee ane 0 C EN T R P ARK °� 01 °D°� c z N u u O 0� P GO I— w a y V I 0 Pii .� FLORIDA P.E. NO. 25801 -AL sawD CJ) � O m m II �� C) r— C W l v $ „y o submitted to any euthooty ur used Wellington, gt n, Fl. Wellington, Florida 414-47a4 O1E CD rw anyporyos w .go.d.nd DATE CENTRAL BLVD PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA (561)795o833 CA- 678q T lo V �C�.. be 6 •o �+D ro ro ��. m N m ON .I I Nr t� Nw I ; I VON IM T' f 4 mm ��j •'�. cn m � { m ImOcn I rneeaDn nryesareNOrvRUO T h any "'" 'nay a me I °C�pI I r > DO D�Z �'i� I co>m i mD < ~ _...._ o • I > 03 D I m° mnZjI/N f j DZD Z C) Z 1,1 O w z > Im �m� mmm I II DMZ mm� N c� �m� rZ� Z -0 ~" °rn_ °z f I lTc)� imz; moms IDmI C cn m � { m ImOcn � rneeaDn nryesareNOrvRUO T h any "'" 'nay a me +'I °C�pI I r > DO D�Z �'i� I co>m i mD ~ O n T Z f odgloy slynan.re end reused seal m z °- SITE PLAN APPROVAL O w z > m X I mmm I N N N cf) m c _� Consulting Engineers a ' I m �� °X oI o g z T $ ro a D s,rature aed.—d :ear are Bre=ed. Drawings eor .vgnee ane DANNY P. BRANNON. P.E C EN T R P ARK °� 01 °D°� c bo O 0 I u u O 0� P GO I— w a Pii seeree by me en9�eeer snap nor be FLORIDA P.E. NO. 25801 -AL sawD ,.yp,,.. ro na nto[cr. ar r, m Continued on Sheet EP -3 -n N Z C ^_ m N Q g rneeaDn nryesareNOrvRUO T h any "'" 'nay a me DRAWINGS FOR: Brannon & Gillespie. uc ==a& ~ f odgloy slynan.re end reused seal SITE PLAN APPROVAL M � M a N N N R the en9ineerenress the o g—i Consulting Engineers a o oI o g z T $ ro a s,rature aed.—d :ear are Bre=ed. Drawings eor .vgnee ane DANNY P. BRANNON. P.E C EN T R P ARK °� 01 °D°� u u O 0� P GO I— w a Pii seeree by me en9�eeer snap nor be FLORIDA P.E. NO. 25801 -AL Hill Blvd., Suite roz ,.yp,,.. ro na nto[cr. ar l v $ „y o submitted to any euthooty ur used Wellington, gt n, Fl. Wellington, Florida 414-47a4 O1E rw anyporyos w .go.d.nd DATE CENTRAL BLVD PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA (561)795o833 CA- 678q «w°D°`o� .w.'°o •o �+D ro ro eareddo — otserere .-d. f°141 "Tp110 D1 °� G: \2005- Projeo5 -120 La Miraposa - EB Developers \CAD - PHOTOMETRIC Dwgs020P- 12- 20- 05.dwg, 1/8/2006 4:39:32 PM, \ \server \HP LaserJet is Series PC N Continued on Sheet EP -2 N cn M N m D G), I N r w C rn m M <n A'I, Q II z 0 0 0 ? NX j Q O 70 AFT1 T1 m m > `-rA N D p M Ma z G .._ _ _L.. I _ ..._... M co I o I z 0 - M .- F v I ' m v D D ml Cn FsJII x I C)r—C 5 A y S V I D oC1�z Dv 0 Z e I DEG) > Z M _._.. -D per_....._ Tl ,cn 0 D z_ N \ ym rn D M x �? � 91 777 .11 !� v M O > C7 C) j rmi i z x G7 +n Cn 71 07 M Z _+ I I m I n��D M ��' n z > �7 C7 C c m li z m A fTl GO I �Q �7 -Zi N M > o zI - I I I I _ I I � , N 7 (N: �I. 0 C3 z (Zj I I ry D m C O I' m :�5 y ro A D0 mm�I m m ° T - - -- - -- Z� SDI z m _ 0 I m I --..-_._.._—._....._— ........ _-__ ...... -- o i { i I I r� : I ...... _ ........ _.... T rn x p m z m x � D Z 0 W Orn �� QZ DDG) r4 D �Z Dn W rn j,� cn�A I Z z -{ -{ �% :U 6� N n oA ox ��� o -� -nr ZM Z1M cn�C in I U) n z m p � � z m 0 D M �m mcn A �Am z CID z 'r O D no c>o z -� D m G) Z '' 0 I C N m ;7 W O m Z CD -0 D I O m or �� iL7 =ZZ !�( m m C D (j) 1� -+ z i I = z I I I I I C I :TJ DDDD 4 4 Th— DormngsamNOTVALID DRAWINGS FOR: fw any purpose which re9uxes the Brannon & Gillespie. uc w ■� �+n 1 i N w _ N0.1 I siy turn n0 mr ed seal SITE PLAN APPROVAL � ' �'w M �a� M �� N o a P I N I g s S' + of the an ;near nmaaa the nn--1 9 Q endraisedsealere Consulting Engineers ' �° `` ° ° Z DANNY P. BRANNON. P.E. I m Z p a9ned, em..ee. Uen+ngs of srgnea end CENTRAL PARK [� a U p $ g fA W u eeled by the engine.. snap not he FLORIDA P.E. NO. 25801 12798 W. t'—t Hill Blvd., Suite toe Wellington, Florida 33414 -4704 jrg,g01,p°T°tj,q rwic�, N m�tcnu o w � P U CENTRAL BLVD PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 17 C7 ro w ro ro y au y w use emihedro an !hoof d rwanypwpoaawnemsigneeand salad doc m1 n1: era m uin:d. DATE . J (56t)795-9833 CA. 6784 N unoa o®r A Aamort wntarornl,vr11ts1srt t�aella 10 1K ��� G: \2005- Projecw -120 La Miraposa - EB Developers\CAD-PHOTOMETRIC Dwgs 0 20P-1 2-20-05.dwg, 1/8/2006 4:32:01 PM, \\server\HP LaserJet 0 Series PC O r) �� OLA) Kul Im ITT 71 F - 0 j4 These Drawings N TVALID f—uyP.mo-.h'vho,q.vesfh. original signature and raised seal flih—g—eronfess.songinal sign to andraised -alare -E& DZMgs not goad and —W by the anginumah.0 not be submilled to any authority o,- ... d fm any purpose where signed and sealed documents are ou;ur,ed. DRAWINGS FOR: SITE PLAN APPROVAL Brannon& Gillespie. Consulting Engineers 12798 W Forest Hill Blvd., Suite 102 Wellington, Florida 33414-47u4 (56�) 795-o833 CA. rla No ,y al oa�p W. a1M .1-m —mm- to CA M 0 0 FANNY P. BRANNON. P.E. FLORIDA P.E. NO. 25601 DATE CENTRAL BLVD PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA z 0 ch M > z 0 M 0 -U 71 coo BOO M g: 0 a Z T c 0 ✓ > cf) z M X 0 M c: x 0 :Z! cz �'- ;0 rQ C-l2 (n -j n -1 0 ?5 * m co < > 0 cr n --A Q) m 0 z Z 0 U) C 5 z -n > M 0 C) :j 0 > Z -. * Z > U) M M 0 crI 110 G) z (j) () ;0 > M M z M r- m0 rD -U G) > < z > 0 co 0 > X 0 E: ;0 c 0 M u > M M > G) c G) M > C:: G) > - -0:� M cn -n 0 Z -1 x 0 M X r- ::� Cc C-) 0 M -n cf) > M M -j M c M rp X :U Om --i x z -- - ------- ... .......... ... . . ........... ---- Z ti ----- m coco fn ----- ------ ............. . . . . .... - .......----- KInnO A 01nnfir- ---------- --r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7 , - - - k - - - - j - - - Uri iv �3 11 in CD . ........... v. N a CD IMF M i. u, M UZI i 00 --q c') 0j M X ?� in 0 -n m (j) I 0 711 m c 0 z T i C-) > z < C) 2! M > r- > 0 - 0 ;U --I CO M TI < M m o x 00 CD cn . . .... > > > > > c q X n �c - > > M m C) > -n n > n m4 . . .... cfj m + or- C: +* + + + + 0 + + + + * , f , f + Continued on Sheet EP-5 i ow l 1, F - 0 j4 These Drawings N TVALID f—uyP.mo-.h'vho,q.vesfh. original signature and raised seal flih—g—eronfess.songinal sign to andraised -alare -E& DZMgs not goad and —W by the anginumah.0 not be submilled to any authority o,- ... d fm any purpose where signed and sealed documents are ou;ur,ed. DRAWINGS FOR: SITE PLAN APPROVAL Brannon& Gillespie. Consulting Engineers 12798 W Forest Hill Blvd., Suite 102 Wellington, Florida 33414-47u4 (56�) 795-o833 CA. rla No ,y al oa�p W. a1M .1-m —mm- to CA T c" Z FANNY P. BRANNON. P.E. FLORIDA P.E. NO. 25601 DATE CENTRAL BLVD PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 0 0 0 W Continued on Sheet EP -4 _ —i 4 These Dm%ftS are NOT VALID laanppwhdaulne i n c p CJ) f > m 7- m D z._......,, Z • N• N• . �..., ...,, W w © _.._ -. � m � , -. M < M O -- �• N Ni sgnf dmisadsee of th engines, u neaa the mgna SITE PLAN APPROVAL i C7 N 6 tV rn N —.._ _... _ n O rC y In V I ° I `� N < a 8i srgnafum end rersed seal era B •bin rcnannrewaT°n[ra�r ry I I 4 L,, - ti A m r ' NT • t� n/ O l(_�C�r 1 � 1 N o re o eCd, Drawings na signed and CENTRAL PARK acr �y ao7 � u� n M era a "' Em'e" irv, p $ J o o L. b. ry �V _ = �'- IV O m m "'AY_, jy m m ©rC R n - l,-„ t'r_.,`wc -_-. '♦ �. >cfi-ti -�' V u Oa' Z hl m CENTRAL BLVD PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA any aefhonry or ease o any pemeaa wnaasgned and ...e n.,...,..e.,... e.e.e......e.. DATE Wellington, Florida 33gfq -g7oq (56r) 795_x833 CA. 6784 A ®A> r wns wo rm err•areut[ b 4f b b (..• N ' N rC I In m ''^^ m b U..... W i W V m T cn z h 4 Z O 3 � O w O 0 CD n a t--r I CD CD e"r 11J 0-11 •• r i II V/ ♦ I ,. m C7 be I I o yl o of U Z G7 w0 mO� __ 1 O v _ ••..., <, K m (n r m mo mm X m - < ....� — -zi O Co U) W _� d -o• G� m u cn �-� W EN M __C _ TRAM 8 - - 00 7 — ;a A G Gmc >W x 0 FD M < =mn mcFn © Sz -U m >M(-) n0JZ AG7 r' fTl Fr mx�� _cn u U, v c m X ���o -D O Z o�V zo N D r D C? I N I. t—� CD C)+ CD l J Law Q -�tJC These Dm%ftS are NOT VALID laanppwhdaulne i n c p CJ) f > m 7- m D z._......,, x� DMZ O © _.._ -. � m � -. M < M O -- -- r Z K r i II V/ ♦ I ,. m C7 be I I o yl o of U Z G7 w0 mO� __ 1 O v _ ••..., <, K m (n r m mo mm X m - < ....� — -zi O Co U) W _� d -o• G� m u cn �-� W EN M __C _ TRAM 8 - - 00 7 — ;a A G Gmc >W x 0 FD M < =mn mcFn © Sz -U m >M(-) n0JZ AG7 r' fTl Fr mx�� _cn u U, v c m X ���o -D O Z o�V zo N D r D C? I N I. t—� CD C)+ CD l J Law Q These Dm%ftS are NOT VALID laanppwhdaulne i DRAWNGS FOR: Brannon &Gillespie. u.oeI r.n.oafn N ' o c m N sgnf dmisadsee of th engines, u neaa the mgna SITE PLAN APPROVAL Consulting Engineers ar aR rr a1N11. 101eM I ° I `� N ro 8i srgnafum end rersed seal era B •bin rcnannrewaT°n[ra�r DANNY P. BRANNON. P.E. FLORIDA P.E. NO. 25601 N 0 o eCd, Drawings na signed and CENTRAL PARK acr �y ao7 � u� n M era a "' Em'e" C 8 p $ o sealed by fne engo—sna ,m ffe saemrteed to rp7g8 W. Forest Hill Blvd., Suite fos CENTRAL BLVD PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA any aefhonry or ease o any pemeaa wnaasgned and ...e n.,...,..e.,... e.e.e......e.. DATE Wellington, Florida 33gfq -g7oq (56r) 795_x833 CA. 6784 A ®A> r wns wo rm err•areut[ b 4f b b lb G: \2005- ProjeW120 La Miraposa - EB Developers\CAD-PHOTOMETRIC Dwgs 1* 20P-1 2-20-05.dwg, 1/8/2006 4:26:52 PM, \\server\HP LaserJet 9 Series PC Z it0 4 cn It O =r n m > > x 2 --j (D M --i 7- 0 cn m 2 > 0 0 ca- m N > G) W C Z 0 cn 0 m m c/) 6i (n -V M m x '& �_� 0 --A X ?O M -U M -0 < - 6) Z C> > Z 0 > _0 m 03 __4 __� :�; m ;U c --i (n z X x -n M (t) -n m 00 m m z x 0 --I mix x M> BOO 0 0 U) -0 (n z x C) 0C 0 m ;U (n c) m c x m 000 > < m z __j U) > > M 0 x __j c: CO cn > r- m z C, 0 > (q 5 , ob-1 z m cn z 6 5 z -n m o ;D >> 0 0 M. m ED :j zoo -0 0 > Z ;r 'm Z —Aw 0 C:: Z Z rl"I M 00 0 Zmm z > x c m - W W;lj > 02 ➢ M m 0 -1 z 0 c 0 _'O > 03 T 0 �n n m Fq mm r- m x F m -n -0 > GO m 0 z M M m z z z z X CD RE illmolwk . . . . ...... 7_ ' MAINTAN MIN U 'ET SP CING :IETWEEN PO�LE BAS w T_ 0 ---------------- ---- k vv —.,-OHW �i,l�l,iNl �. N _ 6 c. CD 1 4 ;U C) ozy —4 w o C)r—(= t* re 111l w _e .-e _e C bl -n i ry (� I� ImiWl i N. ��. M < �> IrD CD f— 0 + OW > C ....... . .. 0 > rTl Ell P 41. 0 ;;" cnk 4 4 to U) > I %� I > > 4E ZAR 00n p C) M M C T (f) z m CD m CY) > > (f) C.) M C > M 0 X *K>55 a > > > c: G) m 0 c: CD 6 CE) > m n > m n -1 - x C2 __4 CY) . . . . ...... 7_ ' MAINTAN MIN U 'ET SP CING :IETWEEN PO�LE BAS w T_ 0 ---------------- ---- k vv —.,-OHW �i,l�l,iNl �. N _ 6 c. CD 1 4 ;U C) ozy —4 w o C)r—(= t* re 111l w _e .-e _e C bl -n i ry (� I� ImiWl i N. ��. M < �> IrD CD f— 0 + OW > C ....... . .. 0 > rTl Ell P 41. 0 ;;" cnk 4 4 to U) > I %� I Continued on Sheet EP-7 i�'co'm 4E ZAR 00n -Ax 2 m -n Z 0 m rr' 0 0 0 G) Z C-) > m ;0 m c: (1) m 0 m Cn m Z CU T' -v K >X (1) - :* m �= ;K m- g z zo 1: mm ML, ?. - MV) m > 2- 00 Continued on Sheet EP-7 i�'co'm 00n 0 2 m -n Z 0 m rr' 0 0 0 G) Z C-) > m ;0 m c: (1) m 0 m Cn m Z CU T' -v K >X (1) - :* m �= ;K m- g z zo 1: mm ML, ?. - MV) m > 2- 00 Z' cf) 6 > P 0 0 m x m 4 < r- 0 0 0 cl) MIR © > � G: \2005- ProjeW120 La Miraposa - EB Developers \CAD - PHOTOMETRIC Dwgsle 20P_12- 20- 05.dwg, 1/8/2006 4:26:27 PM, \ \server \HP LaserJet IV Series PC l 1 Continued on Sheet,,EP-6 N cl m m I cyy s N . . 4 . > N, N, Fn m N_ O X m o, ro� m <m� :pXcnm I>11 / zC /p o Om 0 DCn XO ! l7 X Z O r n;7 > zc z -0 o �� D' T C� �m o I IN 011 \ i �o m 0 7 ! IT m mm *n�� �Y I > m z n O j \ U) m m ro0 / m m FV A- C� CL �� rn c (D cry o vOA N x Q m0 m o cn m D z r Z Q m m m O p > o Z =Xyz ro0 ro o� O0 _ i z X n o Oro ro c ti` f> z Z > C o Z m r v O o m r n �� m T > rnoo 00o mTz � `�` p G� Nmo Dm rz CD Imo{ J O mm Sm - E: >0 11J > nm i =mmn mOcn m° yDMM M•� .>rnc a ono �U) -n (f) rH> + m >m m �O Fn _ �zC <�T D> mCo Z7c U3 N Z7 Q z n z m ~ OmG; cn >z Z:Z O mo�z U 0 X c D G)� > OX�> y VI Wpm z �Oao W m_0F > n-<� � m mm mm -icnc� - z > ro D z m 0 m ro G) z r D zOo zm m IM Z O n v fD t-± O II �� w Q 0 c--r r Fes-+ l 1 w DDDD G: \2005- Projeo -120 La Miraposa - EB Developers \CAD - PHOTOMETRIC Dwgs *20P_12- 20- 05.dwg, 1/8/2006 4:21:18 PM, \ \server \HP LaserJet * Series PC a 4 Z O 11 O W O O r� M••r • n 0 w ice+ 0 o O o� m0 O � i� ON D I I C (p N) X cQ m D m > r ✓Di J CS r A, '' 'r �\ , cn c" 1 k jam' ,r! gj✓ -11 0 F1-, N o D Q! w w, a N m, a - C7 X co t /Pty 09 —W ;e in it 0 -- \ `• ,�( � -___ __ % - �.:: -_:. -fin 14. n ,ti - in M-- n Or-C \� m n n p a � 0 q < (7 6 < m N cow 0� C>r—C >> n h m O n n � zy < E —I D z m E < C) m -� oo��m i C'c3z T U1 cj) \ >CD;U Continued on Sheet EP -9 y I N it m omn m> K -� � I m c�ncnv MCX m ZDc > to J � N M D Z mc"_ D cnx i mc„, SCI 0? � I A All I ! i ! I I I I I l 1 i `o _1 N �m _X. r i w ; F. � o m y Dm m 0i Z (n I � --11 1 Ul O mm' ) X D zi Dm j o m Im J i° I� O n DD©1> o iS 4 M W N 39 $ m s u o ,j. + \ c to fw,, Orewos are NOT VALID lw an Y Purpose wnien requires me orrgrnel slgnerure end rased seal n/Me engineer uNess fne argrnal sN-W and- -d seal are are..ed. D amngs not sgned and sealed by the engineer snap nor be sub1bd h, any aurno- or uaad y hyporposawnerasrgnedand Baled documents are re urred DRAWINGS FOR: SITE PLAN APPROVAL CENTRAL PARK y Brannon & Gil►e ie. uk / SP I /.� Consulting Engineers rs798 W. Forest Hill Blvd., Suite wz Wellington, Florida 33414 -47u4 (56 rl'4.5-rrH:i:1 C.1r F�H4 are�rr m a nay OCCAINl1i auwaa u• o ,� wo,y tay.r nc ,worn a ns olam, 'Kam n• �* TM^' � �� "°� m° "°` nn auto xor u>m rr nc °A°r O1 a ten' �mnq! ro Ms AGFCf, nl ia1 Casa ro ^�� ^a"�O°1°* ^ "a'm•s* Nwl•C NO •T11!lIIOI01,1[ �� ro nc ooml. N I N 10 O O 1 11 O u I tr N O O a1 m N I O O a `� ° x 1 DANNY P. BRANNON. P.E FLORIDA P.E. NO. 25601 DATE CENTRAL BLVD PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA V ,a 0 ,� <3 0- 120LoPWkapusa'EB ns\CAD'PHOTOK8ETR|CDwg P_12'2O'O5.dwo.1/O/2006418:27 PM, \\senx*hHPLaaedet 0 Series PC o RIM IN TIO gN ON Rl mono G: \2005- Proje* -120 La Miraposa - EB Developers \CAD - PHOTOMETRIC Dwgs *20P_12- 20- 05.dwg, 1/8/2006 4:12:53 PM, \ \server \HP LaserJet * Series PC l 1 Continued on Sheet EP -9 N 0- mx �_ DA 'm N' r) Jvi cn N m0 Q e Q CD z >c V ' 1 n m / > 0 m � V �� � Z C7 ° O C m No \ \ \ �� 4 G) .: WQQ 0 c m m -H C \ \ oQ-� / C N M m 0 m G) ° ,CJ m < -0 Q m m ;� -- \ � _ Q -� I_ nm�Am -U ( �Y c� \ C Z � r n X x7 �\ Rt X D ;[J U zm QQmc� =0p 0 \Z 0 Z © m �G?zm cnnm 0 \`m� N z --j> cmcmzm U)p �y O0zN °mml 0 cnr \ D m zmm - m>z D'n \ mm °Z z j \ `-� : m ": e--r Q i CD Z O N �. CD F-! O II �� W O O F� r� n V ` ` DDDD GA2005- Projeco-120 La Miraposa - EB Developers \CAD - PHOTOMETRIC Dwgs \020P_12- 20- 05.dwg, 1/8/2006 3:59:54 PM, \ \server \HP LaserJet -0 Series PC c Z —n p r— N ., m C .. C mm XDO C) m 0 CD H .qN j w p x/ cn to cwn' �z I �cn tQ ! > o M D< gym, Z' Im / Z' m / O co p n Z -Om m� mlv /% Ile a Z4) �0 n { cn m • N m n m p N 11 �� / �- m i X a II l-+ AzD W Z'. G) Z N m N O O > �° O _ M m N r— F+ D Z C7 z r, V \ m ar: r m� r.. \ r- m; ., n ^ r Z �' >l I' ✓' / cn 0 z-0 �' m i m '�i j m m O Wit, 1\ n I n m ^\• , mm A l (� X m � ,• 1 g \ rT m q n c7 \ �\8 O \ Z N a, r., U Continued on Sheet EP -12 DDDD ll, 1 I� $+ m > to Z 0 + u rnaaa aaw� 9s am NOT vnuD brany purpose whtn requires the og °atagNreenea;aedaaat of the eny mesa ma onyinat signature end raised sti ^era elFxed. Drawings trot signed end �° � aeakd Cy the engineer shalt not be sudrdtad to my authority or used for an purpose where signed end Y DRAWINGS FOR: SITE PLAN APPROVAL CENTRAL PARK Brannon & Gillespie, i�c Consulting Engineers S 12798 W. Fort Hill Blvd., suite 102 ly Wellington, Run& 33414-4704 (561) 795'0833 CAP 6784 �� om�a oM..,cs . o ���• �• •�n•11 1K ^ T ^�' W nir a�uu•wmc �OAnc «�•� ,tpp a to no vaa,ccr. a rne1[11urmwn r11a�n.� FOTE"3°®r ^ "°®p1T w •amc aro •lw arravRaR av I o O v- i .`i O N m to a I O C CA w I- n' 1 O c a x DANNY P. BRANNON, P.E. FLORIDA P.E NO. 25801 DATE CENTRAL BLVD PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA '7 b b b required aeebtl tlowments are uiree. �'� m ^� �•� G: \2005- Projeco-120 La Miraposa - EB Developers \CAD - PHOTOMETRIC Dwgs \020P- 12- 20- 05.dwg, 1/8/2006 3:59:01 PM, \ \server \HP LaserJet Series PC 11J Continued on Sheet EP -11 .m Z e �, I✓ Dm �� /� m m ?� :� o� - m -D m \ \ `��\ p J o; i c� U) f 00 Z� m� Z n m �T o .Z>7 OHW ._.— _.....__� —._. `OHW �._�,..�s_��.....__ ... c P. /, A�1 r v baWm m �� O O m m tS • , r N _U°0m 0 -cxn X' , \� cv m G) -D Z V w _. _ -- ..__... .\ ____ _. ____.._ _____ —_ —_ —� _ m N D Q p v r�rn n Apo nmr � mWa C 0-0 M10 O -O 01 71 � 0�D 71 ���DDio c v z m m A m 2 O Z z D n D c Z 0 0 \ t n / 0mcn m 0m z �. Onm0mm mzc �mZm �\ ' m�Z>Mcn m4Om XDOx \ o..�coo °zv1i�cZ(n v\ z m D m T Z 0 D Z�o m�0 m�(CnD G)0 G d m D Z? O r < J6 O D p 0 \ \�� o ,�m a mmD Z�O14 ccn m zO m \ \\ m I�7 l 1 cn�m�mt 7ZI cn pe z0 -n 5m < co c m n v1 \D, 0 0 4 r- > m r U i <m ` �\ X / i M �N � / mm Vz D0 r \ Z -U A V1 m cn s rir O ►m i ► OZ z 0 o cn W m7f CD 3 ___......i D D m 0 (f) zy CD O �ZOm m� m C3 Fn - U) Dp O� C1 (j) 7Kzp m Z fD c)� � r ' m -n �+ I-+ O M D O o W O 0 m ?7 O_ __) z m > (n D cn m =� -Zj > G� n rn V z -I mo! � /�� O ;O 0 Z ,m �.a. z0 0m rc ^ O Wm D m �'I o 0 mm m 5 D z co m 5� ll, DDDD 4 r i N $ N > = p g i + + c N rnanypunvae :vreNOrvauo roaanraemefu �vnkb iaadasal 1igMel sgneNre end re /sed seal o/ me anginee, we the odgin.1 signerare ane.eiaed seal are am ad. OreMings nor signed and sealedb dre en Meer shag not be Y 9 subme ed m any sumo ry w used far anY Penrose When, signed and sealed dom—ts ere re eared DRAWINGS FOR: SITE PLAN APPROVAL CENTRAL PARK Brannon & Gillespie, uc Consulting Engineers 12798 W. Fnre.t Hill Blvd., Suite toe (561)7lon,Flerida 33414-47-4 CA, 678 (561) 795-e833 CA, 678q 0 H° *as u «ma��sn a• '� ' arN1 �'�« ne raorwn a nc ravmr «�na nc r�ari.T ncv we MwE Ne a oia11ED a1 pr. �aM MOT M a.[n oa ona reoan rar �gp,- ro ll�f , a aar`'o"a�cnw —Tm ««end «o ernr rweawa aaena�nw ro n+c aam N o I O N "' I I O U (m I N I N O O P CID �o N I ES N O $ O 01 y DANNY P. BRANNON, P.E FLORIDA P.E. NO. 25801 DATE CENTRAL BLVD PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA b b 10 -0 G:\2005- Projeo5 -120 La Miraposa - EB Developers \CAD - PHOTOMETRIC Dwgso20P_12- 20- 05.dwg, 1/8/2006 3:58:27 PM, \ \server \HP LaserJet 10 Series PC V1 Omeeeeeelk 1' a :i �• r a r _. e m u o i 1� • � m �' � e w � � n�rr i �• _ f..,i'm yI t7 -IZ --I -ISC �meewmk • <xL1C X;Dr �� �C�m -iC�y r•Irla��m V mom NDTI ,Z=DNX rl O D m fUA-, A �n f'1 -<C 3. A6 -�1 MM O Z? m 1, m m C Z m y m C = V1 Or p%n rl FV :i7rAy aft J' ti ti °' u u x N. u, e 10? FTI Moo ti °N I i N I I Nv I� v° °N FT] aN�� in m r 1°N 0 off �V O D W Nv dP ..N_19 75 ° �� aO° j ON• G I ° Cr. R' ,b _,p�,m• ° d„ m • m'._..a ni a' _y'O ° W. C�,° �a m. °w. Lf ° ° �• N'O'D' m'I �'') 19a, nom,• m =a{pp, o°u, f H Ia ♦lo ?�l �f °. W. N . td J F b, I 4 r' R . R rn• row' mk ,a• uP �' of R �i • w N�.♦ �' N (�' (N'I u� ._. I NCI N• ri•I �� 0 1 L I y p � N = Y = e N ♦) m 'g, 0..... j .m 4 n 1 IN:I N:I J Ni I i... 0 r P =r ZO) o° N� �� =� � d Ln F- d... N �..a♦ N ,�.. _q K N• a• N �p� �.N. o� I�♦I� INI� N� Ie I'INI� cD owe"• n It DDDD u W m = + o T1reae0rawftg... NOT VAUD loreny purpose wbkJr re4uirea ma o V..1 ft-wre -d eieed eaW arms anginas. urM.se me or/ginN argnsNre and reused se.lare .nixed. Drewlnya no myned e a sealed by me elyxrea MS1,rot be a ubmbtedtoaayaumoAy or used roeny pu4wa. where apnad and 8eded d0°arem8 YB W'ed, DRAWINGS FOR: SITE PLAN APPROVAL CENTRAL P A RK auw /vo aeman•s u aanauaorrs v ears sia u• swu Imlw s � m � � x.u„ta ro nn r.o.ct tw mmr.oaxn waa�°ro° swao t o.arvMn•1 A M aam1. N ro p I " j v I m N g rr oil N g P p "A .� Brannon & Gillespie, Consulting Engineers 1z7g8 W. Forest Hill Blvd., Suite 1us Wellington,Florid. 33414-4704 (561)7950833 CAa 678q DANNY P. BRANNON, RE FLORIDA P.E NO. 25601 WE CENTRAL BLVD PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA ro ro ro ro o� mo O A uo oho I u u �m 4 �IZI§ 5 Z °v f � m �nz vp D' y C N z C,� gm A ° D °s Z O I N J U N i O � • L o - �3 1 �D Z D -o Z 70 m z ° O -� -n w m m ra N V N f Z 0 M X 0 q cn rri J U) ay -i m M � v< a �mz W� co zz cn a Cl) N< m �i m 3 n 0 r r m n 0 z Cl) �l m a z v n 0 z n m v c a r r a z m >M r � �v M M n o < 70 rn v �0 r n r O m N c -p v 00 � i11 4 -< M -n O V r _ O Z �o n v • n U) ay -i m M � v< a �mz W� co zz cn a Cl) N< m �i m 3 n 0 r r m n 0 z Cl) �l m a z v n 0 z n m v c a r r a z 1 1 • • I 0- PLOT DATE: Jan 10. 2006 - 12: 37pm XREFS: K: \ebde \ebde3106 \dwg \3106bm08.dwg K: \ebde \ebde3106 \dwg \3106MOOI.dwg K: \ebde \ebde3106 \dwg \3106MD02.dw9 K: \ebde \ebde 3106\ dwg \incoming \twd2005l220 \CENTRAL- PARK- 12- 20- 05.dwg IMAGES: K:\2003 JOOS\03- 039\8JAGE\424136.tif Ki \ebde \ebcie3106 \dwg \3106EX06.ciwg 1/10/2006 11,1106 AM EST r v Q 7 9 o 8 w a o F � s 3 3 0 n S � 0 0 0 u i J m J 1: �p Z� 8F O 2 a v z^ J ^ PO P'. �o= P V Cw � pQ U O ��l � '--0 z o m -I 0 n }A ym 1 1 1 N 1 N N, IN Z FIR� 1 _ 0 O �8 � N ti m 5 N 0 0 n A Y i 9mo O I w 9 °> r m � A ,�•ziz� MEN O Z F.1 • O u j I N J R °u o T L— v Z :X) 0 zj O • ■ 10 € s - -- - - -- - - -- ----- - - - - -- - NBO4&03'E J- IS', a oIP Nu -j - -- --------------- - - - -- EXIST. ST 36' DIP RWAI _ _ _____ EXI ____ I I 1 _p4_ DIP RYM __ I I -- - -- - - _-} - -_ - - - --} -- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - -- ----------- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -1 ✓ III II ���'! �],►1. 111 I � V T� C �f Z I � UNC F a �J U I III it I II I Q r o I I I oN �� yi 3E I �v I ----- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - - -- - - - I -I V gY 7 UNIT Z 7 UNIT 7 UNIT $ I I A Dm "'o �I I �giSi I Y r3ay � N � Z n;10 A I � I rn � - - - -- a, I I _ m p Q m � N � I ; R4 - R4 CENTRAL BU R s ULEVA - W 2 m I R I � v CONST LF RCP I U Q �i ! STORM DRAIN VN g r H m i� Z } r- � W m Ln Z ° I oA�m m C m ti = I I-rl V i I I --1 I I O ; y 7 Ali III II ���'! �],►1. 111 I � V T� C �f Z I � UNC F a �J U I III it I II I Q r o I I I oN �� yi 3E I �v I ----- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - - -- - - - I -I V gY b Z -a N I I A Dm "'o �I I �giSi I Y v_ m N � Z n;10 A � � I rn NW47'15rE - - - - -- a, cD� N m I _ m p Q m � N � I R4 - R4 CENTRAL BU R s ULEVA - W 2 m nMnn I � v U Q Isg!�Ilil �I rn N c:.. rn v m = 2 N n 2 2 0 25 50 75 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET I I II I Q r o I I I oN �� yi 3E Dmy_ — - - -- - - - - -- I ----- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - - -- - - - I -I V gY b Z -a N I I A Dm "'o �I I �giSi I v_ m N � Z n;10 A I D � C�! C I rn NW47'15rE - - - - -- a, I v' � I Isg!�Ilil �I rn N c:.. rn v m = 2 N n 2 2 0 25 50 75 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET /� 1 II I Q r o I I I oN �� yi 3E Dmy_ — - - -- - - - - -- I ----- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - - -- - - - I -I I gY � I , \ _ Yom_ m 7f r7 N b £S ifi 2 X D ° v_ m g� -� J NW47'15rE - - - - -- a, v' R4 - R4 CENTRAL BU R s ULEVA - nMnn I � Isg!�Ilil �I rn N c:.. rn v m = 2 N n 2 2 0 25 50 75 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET El I Q C A ,.1 oN �� yi c735 Pq �q mm)�'1 7f �j r7 N b £S Isg!�Ilil �I rn N c:.. rn v m = 2 N n 2 2 0 25 50 75 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET I Q C iN C N:U ZO N 7f �j r7 2 X D ° v_ m X Isg!�Ilil �I rn N c:.. rn v m = 2 N n 2 2 0 25 50 75 100 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET • 01, 1 0. l K: ebde ebde3106 dw 3I06EX04. dw 1/10/2006 11:09:25 AM EST o�D m S� v m � z s O Qom. QN W a O I r 1 I ZA=P l�si�^s Tl V1 A 5�^SN > r_ 5 z C N 50 i g ;orz it r V) �' � co lz oi.• ! K,i u Q q JA rnr� f �{ > A i m o o f s >- z o -- - - -- - - -- - - - -- - - -- - -- - -- - - - - -- - - - -- - -- - - - -- - - - - -- - -- T— — — — D N N _ - - - - -- - - -- - -- - -- - -- --- -- - -- -- -- - - --- ------------ EX T_ 36" -- R __ __ ____ N ______ ____ ____ --------- _____ _ _ _ ___ __ __ ®fIST. 24_DIPtp n „y y r € g f C(N. ARFA 7 UNIT 3 F 7 UNIT s AREA �• A 4Ra x Z p N i r D P. rn �, t 3 NUS A$$U m Z rn I _ m ¢�j�� m E z V) G9 -Al i5R rri Im Fr'ii°I mNC y gq� 6 2 .I_' °�� rn o o cn ° i a �rn-I `i � F -? � 0 . f /, \ �� j 10 UNIT S D m CD�D�7 i F Q G un 0 4r P9 L 25 A- �� _ H j2FF i�ygF i3 b j� > � o. � p•iw��o S2 n� Z PR i 0 25 50 75 100 i >° GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET A-5 gig€ z O p N > A V1� V O 4 O + W. K:\ebde\ebde3106\dwg xC 0 m •. =p�Nw+�n D m IO 7 T S rn \ zzmzm �v0 � byf� Ilg zzs�s XvDm v � ss :5IT II4 O p p m-1 6�`\ U Q � g `` 8 - i I I� C 13,� f - Iil I -6;3. ' N I m N is�3' / / 1\�� L •� CONST. LF RCP I CA o C. I All' + `\ k \ \\\ \ \ o f I` m I Co cm Qu m CONST. LF RCP'I i = COY. I I I i] m 7 UNIT 7 UNIT I i 4� �, - -- -- - \ c i I nj - CON ST. ? A ' S • �° v z m� °s \ \ \ m II ck LL S JN BB8$ I - CZ V /O/�� C��mm� Tl �i����p Siff. \ \��C�.�2 \ _ _ __�________+___ ♦p �+ m VJ v �. "?D3\\ SN LLi4 '' N�•V r�i fi TRASH ROOM �.. QQ .-. I ZM FD Em I ...v � Q \ � {{.�� a _O�T�SI . R's��Za• C 0 •� � C C 00^4. o is is w I c Nm o m 75 LS x�V Q�� �o Al � EE N N N O$ O 2R \ C G 4 Z m_ O 0 25 50 75 100 I — GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET o V K W O Q 0 0.- :J rtl MCI J: IMAIr : K: \ebde \ebde3106 \dwg \3106EX07.dwg 1/10/2006 11:13:32 AM EST r 7 IN At ID � � o Sm84�1 0; u v 0 n s � E � z v � m O n S O 0 u 4 • .. - R s r R o I� 71 Ia RnY $ N I I b C H C A I iiS5555 0 v K „ f f�f5j� _ E �e CN �� $ a $ I4i C n 8 ° O� �% fS �q o m �$a g Nor 8 mss N Ip I� �>3 Z $$N8F z BF R/W WE oic R R v c� r J m O ° R ' p N H � I e� X. S ° p' rn 8 N _ O q G � $ IP v P Io SR Z �z I v 5�z ®® L v 0 `v Z D cgs 2 O m I�Rf �pz-I O P + • ■ N > A I S J 4 O + m 0 n o rn Z �N 0 �g 51 $sR �C A m SN 'z � D D 8R m� 0 0 OR ��_ $ a 8 I„ i Ai m $ L O �\ � Z $mN8l� n 2.r, r a r it N $ 0 o� i� m 0 n o rn Z �N 0 �g 51 $sR �C A m SN 'z � D D 8R m� 0 0 OR ��_ $ a 8 I„ i Ai m $ L O �\ � Z $mN8l� n 2.r, r a r it $ m 0 n o rn Z �N 0 �g 51 $sR �C A m SN 'z � D D 8R m� 0 0 OR ��_ $ a 8 I„ i Ai m $ L O �\ � Z $mN8l� n 2.r, r a PLOT DATE: Jan 10, 2006 - 12:40pm XREFS: IMAGES: K: \ebde \ebde3106 \dwq \3106EX08.dwq 1/10/2006 11:06:56 AM EST U +� N A > R � q � s � x i 0 2 O O Y u m m t^ m A a�j Z ZZ a) A 6 D CPR D ti O Z .o. J i N D4 A J � O O p z. 0 m CD 0 0 6- $ j 2$ 7 1/2' 12' o P c N � go � r rn rn po 0 4 � CD o z ;9 °> �K O r--, g =_ i A g � k � JII IILI 8 p Z M N 0 A R rep% 1 12• 1 12' 1 i 1. -1 Qi P 1� c . N >S 1 v rn rn C 4 � I= z ® e;Am . N >S �< C3® C a u CD o Z �� II �N II s� II m c cm �{ D o w R P P t;R, oR SY '�F 91 rn N rn 0 O >_> Z % r �m o A 6• 0 Z Z. m 16* >o g 8 m ;0 >f 6• MIN. >o r+1 _ C ae ° 6/2 > Gz LI 10 3•: C a u CD o r �m o A 6• 0 Z Z. m 16* >o g 8 m ;0 >f 6• MIN. >o r+1 _ C ae ° 6/2 > Gz LI 0 C f ' y r =Y Z Z 0 _z ^Z V / Q7 _n T a° S G77 0 Z C!A • • 0 0 0 (000") =z ;r V J �o � O O C rp o� rD n (P m n y O z N On >� CrIq �n (P rt n y O Z x rr 0 n =z ;r CP J crq V >� �7,� o OPn � x 0 0 0 F---1 �a000 60 (D w "Z O d Ta N o, o w p d 31 3 c a (1 r7 Oq (T — ^ri r r. /TtW i rp J rt. �• r rD r rn 0 z rD 0 rt rD N d II�^ Vl O rt rt 0 Jt T- *Eli N W 44h (!l cp1 J 00 O 0.-1 0 0 z �D �A UQ Central Park PRIMARY GRAPHICS CRITERIA N T - - T to f — c — � 7J _Ul) N rD M rra^t VI 1 u rt rt U�4 Mz C) �O g F z 0 0 0 v. y C�J Z y Z �5 C Alternate Retail Tenant Identity II pf Y�i Y J--- � z S N RI �5 C Alternate Retail Tenant Identity II • • • a y �. Z -n J C) C V U-14 Z n C,jl .:r Ul J ~• i f s J .F CL zL - ? Q �D = n T VY J 17 i aT oar a ac V N��V �,?AVO jVlp^ i g °� ou o0 0N -��N `S mCH II rD 7E - f ;71 f, r _ _ aT oar a ac V N��V �,?AVO jVlp^ i g °� ou o0 0N -��N `S mCH II I 1 1 II Jc Tl '1 Ill- I- L. I- - 1 --I Y / ._I_--__---- Retail Tenant Identity - Central Park - 'RIMARY GRAPHICS CRITERIA ri 7 1111 1' I I IIL- I I - 1111- --- ..------_.-_.._.__.I_.._ _. ___ - - --- - -- __--_-__ ___---I__ - Central Park Alternate Retail Tenant Identity PRIMARY GRAPHICS CRITERIA I! m n 0 'r- I I I 9 h tn -. I. 0 2 - r I I -~-____ Projecting Tenant Identity I- Central Park I RIMARY GRAPHICS CRITERIA --- -- ___-- ---- ---- - ___-_ - .. lm cn mi n a I ____- _____I____- __ ----------- Central Park Primary Identity Concept PRIMARY GRAPHICS CRITERIA L C li /B Q ti i I Central I I--- --I- IIUIIY-m --we---- Park - RIMARY GRAPHICS CRITERIA Primary Identity Concept - I I -I v C LWA ra I I F- I II d 1 Residences Identity Concept d 4 n Z 3 3 r m /" ! ! i I 1 I I t d Yo dh I I I"" i ... , .. . .._ - 1 . _I____-____ - - The Shops Directional Concept ' - Central Park 1 XIMARY GRAPHICS CRITERIA II e !k!l 3 2 C 2. 3 m ;/, ' E. ," r .. . - . ~. ... . . . Central Park PRIMARY GRAFECS CRITERIA I Residential Direc tioiial Eiitraiice Concept i I .. . .. 5 I e cn T fD fD ct v, m n 4 H w e. ..- r- - - -. . nt r or -- Central Park I Type A Information Identity - __ - -- 1 'RIMARY GRAPHICS CRITERIA e C --_I__ .- - - - -- -__ Central Park Type B Vehicular Information PRIMARY GRAPHICS CRITERIA a - ;“ ne c fD ‘1 .,VI I i Y CG tD I i! i c 2. 3 m ! ! -- -- - _______--I_ - -- - - - _- - - -------- --_-_ ! Type B Vehicular Information I i I- ‘ ,Central Park PRIMARY GRAPHICS CRITERIF, 1 n 0 I cn Y. I 34 w 2. c3 'c 'd CD Type C & D Information Signage ' Central Park I RIMARY GRAPHICS CRITERIA t d CD m d e P, c1 c1 0' t 3 d id e F '2.J M + M N M w \\ ______ ______ -I_-__- ______- __-- Type E Wall Mounted Signage __-__~ __ Park PRIMARY GRAPHICS CRITERIA - _.___________- I dh I 1 f I 1 \ I\ // Central Park Type F Unit Identity 2RIMARY GRAPHICS CRITERIA I e- -1 c 3 2 t 1. 3 m 0 --__ - - -- - Central Park Type G Garage Identity PRIMARY GRAPHICS CRITERIA c 2. 'i d 2 H r Ij Z G3 H m 6\ w 0 0 +NW 000 +++ I I I mmm 5 rQ 000 I :: mmm I I I 90 OO m mmm 000 td c F tl Z 0 H m m w 0 0 I I H w -b b b I I I 0 0 2 O mmm m 00 00 0 1 I I 1 XPI I II 9 I jY I D ' I Ill lo je ?X e%? -11 _____ II ~ -_______ central J Park Type H Building Identity PRIMARY GRAPHICS CRITERIA - ___ - ___ - --'I I I f 1 \ I I I I I + .. J ... 311 rn m 311 rn z 0 m a r D z 7 P CENTRAL PARK PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 0 + - Landscape ArchiIecturelLand Plannmg/EnvlmnmentaI Consultln( - 0 7 a, YY z u, rn o --I 0 7 - CENTRAL PARK PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA o D r- 2 0 0 0 u, 13 --I I- --I -I $1 - 0 r a 6 7 LandscapeArchltectue/LandPbmlw Environmental Consultation C I- 7i I CENTRAL PARK PREPARED FOR EB DEVELOPERS PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA LAND DESIGN SOUTH I lcndmme-/LOndpbnhg Environmental Consunation AGENDA CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD TUESDAY, JANUARY 24,2006, AT 6:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 0 CALLTOORDER 0 PLEDGE OFALLEGIANCE 0 REPORT BY THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATOR: CHARLES WU 0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: JANUARY 10,2006 PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD Redar Members: Alternates: Craig We (Chair) Barry Present (Vice Chair) Randolph Hansen Dennis Solomon Michael Panczak Douglas Pennell Jonathan D. Rubins Joy Hecht (1" Alt.) Amir -el (P Nt.1 0 SWEARING IN OF ALL PARTIES Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board January 24,2006 Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council: Ex Parte Communication (Quasi JudkM) Petition PCDA-05-11-000001: NortbCorp PCD Amendment 1. Public HearingRecommendation to City Council: A request by Cotleur & Hearing, Inc., agent for RCA Drainage Association, for the approval of an amendment to the development order of the NorthCorp Planned Community Development (PCD) to allow the addition and modification of certain conditions of approval of Ordinance 1, 1990 to be consistent with the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County, the NorthCorp PCD, generally located North of Bums Road, South of PGA Blvd., East of Interstate 95 and West of Alternate A1A. Reject Manager: Joy= Chi, Rhcipal &mer jcd@,ob&.wm (799-4236) Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council: Ex Parle Communication (Quasi J&M) Petition SPLN-05-11-ooOOO3: Anspacb Site Plan Amendment 2. Public HearingRmmmendation to City Council: A request by Cotleur & Hearing, Inc., agent for Anspach Holdings, Ltd., for an amendment to the previously approved site plan to allow for the approval of a 48,941 square-foot building, located on Lot 1 of the 7.0- acre site, which comprises of Lot 1 of the south park center plat and lot 2 of the west park center plat in the NorthCorp Planned Community Development (PCD). The subject site is generally located at the southwest comer of the intersection of Riverside Drive and NorthCorp Parkway. Rqed Manager: Joyce Chi, Principal FIanncr (79%4236) Workshop : PCD-04-01: Pard 31.04 - Rezoning and Master Development Plan Approval SP-04-05: Cimarron Cove - Site Plan Approval 3. Workshop: A request by Marty Minor, of Urban Design Studio, on behalf of Gardens 95 Limited Partnership, L.C.C., for approval of a rezoning from a Planned Development Area zoning designation to a Mixed Use Planned Community District (MXD PCD) Overlay zoning designation and approval of a Planned Community District (PCD) master plan and the site plan of the residential portion of the PCD. The master development plan allows for the development of 11,600 square feet of commercial retail, 15,000 square feet high-turnover restaurant, 4,000 square foot bank with drive-thry a 12,000 square foot drugstore, 10,OOO square feet professional office use and 252 residential dwelling units. The approximately 50.58-acre subject site, refemed to as “Parcel 31.04,” is located on the southeast comer of the Interstate 95 and Central Boulevard intersection and the future I- 95 interchange. Project h4anrga: Tau Eknothman, Planning Wager tbenothnun@obd .wm (799-4233) 2 Plaunmg, Zoning and Appeals Board January 24,2006 4. 5. 6. 7. Workshop: PUD-04-11: Parcels 31.06 and 31.07 - Central Park Residential High and Mixed- Use Planned Unit Development Workshop: A request by Land Design South, on behalf of EB Developers, Inc., for rezoning and site! plan approval of Parcels 3 1.06 and Parcel 3 1.07. Both parcels currently have a Planned Development Area (PDA) zoning designation. Parcel 3 1.06 is proposed to be rezoned to a Planned Unit DevelopmentResidential High (PUD/RH) zoning district with 1 16 condominiums. Parcel 3 1.07 is proposed to be rezoned to a Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (PUD/MXD) with 60 condominiums, 99,934 square feet of commercial and offce development, and a 141,706 square-foot, 409-space parking garage. The approximately 41.75-acre subject site is located at the southwest corner of Hood Road and Central Boulevard and is bounded on the west by Interstate 95 and Westwood Lakes PUD. Project Mmugsr: Jackie Holloman, Planncrjholloman@~bnfl.com (799-4237) OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS ADJOURNMENT In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Florida Stahcte 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special aceanmodations to participate in this proceeding should contact the Civ Clerk’s Ofice, no later than fm ahys prim to the proceeding, at telephone number (561) 799-4120 for assistance; if hearing hpaired, telephone the Floriah Relay Service Nwnbers (800) 955-8771 (TDD) or (8133) 955-8770 (VOICE), fm assistance. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Phnning and Zoning Commission, Local Planning Agenq Board of Zoning Appeals. or Lund Develcpmlent Regdamns Commission. with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, they will need a record @the proceedings; and fa such, they tmy need to ensure &at a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record inchuia the testbnony and evidence qwn which the appeal is to be based. Eucct kgal descriphon ador survey for the cases may be obtainedfian the fdes in the Growth Mmpnent Department. Commodpz agenda 1-24-06.doc 3