Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda P&Z 051413A G E N DA CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD TUESDAY, MAY 14, 2013 AT 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS • CALL TO ORDER • PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE • ROLL CALL • ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, MODIFICATIONS • REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING: NATALIE CROWLEY • APPROVAL OF MINUTES: 04/09/2013 PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD Regular Members: Alternates: Michael Panczak Meriel (Honey) Bryan 1st Alternate Randolph Hansen Roma Josephs Douglas Pennell Charles Hathaway Howard Rosenkranz Robert Savel 1. Recommendation to City Council (Public Hearing) - QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING PUDA-12-12-000047 and CUMJ-12-12-000026 PGA National Commerce Park PUD Amendment A request by Fask Realty, Ltd. for an amendment to the PGA National Commerce Park Planned Unit Development (PUD) to approve a Major Conditional Use for a 1,140- student charter school. The PGA National Commerce Park PUD is located on the north side of Hiatt Drive approximately 0.15 miles northeast of the intersection of Hiatt Drive and Northlake Boulevard. Project Manager: Kathryn DeWitt, Senior Planner, kdewitt@pbgfl.com Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board April 9, 2013 2 2. Recommendation to City Council (Public Hearing) - QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING PCDA-12-02-000013 – PGA Office Center PCD Amendment A request by Florida Power & Light and Spearfisher Partners, LLLP. for an amendment to the PGA Office Center Planned Community Development (PCD) (f.k.a. 5A / PGA Corporate Center) to approve 993,000 square feet of office space and accessory uses. The 86.34-acre site is located east of Military Trail, west of Alternate A1A, and is bisected by Kyoto Gardens Drive. Project Manager: Natalie Crowley, Director of Planning and Zoning, ncrowley@pbgfl.com 3. Recommendation to City Council (Public Hearing) - QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING MISC-13-02-000093 – Legacy Place A request by Miami Children’s Hospital for an amendment to the Legacy Place Master Sign Package. Project Manager: Peter Hofheinz, Planner, phofheinz@pbgfl.com 4. Recommendation to City Council (Public Hearing) - QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING PPUD-13-04-000030 – City Hall Municipal Complex Rezoning and Site Plan Amendment A City initiated request to rezone the City Hall Municipal Complex from Public Institutional (P/I) to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay with an underlying zoning designation of P/I. Site plan modifications are included. Project Manager: Peter Hofheinz, Planner, phofheinz@pbgfl.com 5. Recommendation to City Council (Public Hearing) LDRA-13-01-000045 City-initiated amendment to the Land Development Regulations A City-initiated text amendment to various sections of Chapter 78 of the City’s Code of Ordinances to provide clarity, organization, and consistency. Project Manager: Kathryn DeWitt, Senior Planner, kdewitt@pbgfl.com 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. ADJOURNMENT In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Florida Statute 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodations to participate in this proceeding should contact the City Clerk’s Office, no later than five days prior to the proceeding, at telephone number (561) 799-4120 for assistance; if hearing impaired, telephone the Florida Relay Service Numbers (800) 955-8771 (TDD) or (800) 955-8770 (VOICE), for assistance. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board, Local Planning Agency, or Land Development Regulations Commission, with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, they will need a record of the proceedings; and for such, they may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Exact legal description and/or survey for the cases may be obtained from the files in the Growth Management Department. PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING Page 1 04-09-13 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS 1 PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD 2 REGULAR MEETING 3 April 9, 2013 4 I. CALL TO ORDER 5 The regular meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Chair Hansen. 6 II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 7 III. ROLL CALL 8 Members Present: 9 Chair Randolph Hansen, Vice Chair Douglas Pennell, Michael Panczak, Roma Josephs, Charles 10 Hathaway, Howard Rosenkranz, Robert Savel. 11 Members Absent: None. 12 Also Present: City Attorney, R. Max Lohman; Director of Planning and Zoning, Natalie Crowley. 13 IV. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, MODIFICATIONS 14 None. 15 V. REPORT BY DIRECTOR OF PLANNNING AND ZONING: NATALIE 16 CROWLEY 17 None. 18 VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 19 Member Hathaway made a motion to approve the minutes from the February 12, 2013 meeting 20 and the March 5, 2013 meeting. 21 Vice Chair Pennell seconded. 22 Motion passed 7-0. 23 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS 24 Those preparing to give testimony were sworn in. 25 1. Recommendation to City Council (Public Hearing) CPSS-13-01-000004 Klock Property 26 Small-Scale Future Land Use Amendment A request by Comac Burns Road, LLC for a small-27 scale land use amendment to the Klock Property Planned Unit Development (PUD) in order to 28 change the land use from Industrial (I) to Professional Office (PO). The Klock Property PUD 29 comprises 3.01 acres and is located on the north side of Burns Road approximately 1,200 feet east 30 of the intersection of N. Military Trail and Burns Road. 31 Chair Hansen opened the public hearing. 32 Petitioner: Brian Cheguis, Cotleur and Hearing. 33 Staff Presentation: Senior Planner, Kathryn DeWitt. 34 Public comment: Gary Hines, 149 Kings Way, Royal Palm Beach. 35 Chair Hansen closed the public hearing. 36 Vice Chair Pennell made a motion to approve CPSS-13-01-000004. 37 Member Panczak seconded. 38 Motion passed 7-0. 39 2. Recommendation to City Council (Public Hearing) - QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING 40 PUDA-13-01-000048 Klock Property Rezoning and PUD Amendment A request by Comac 41 Burns Road, LLC to amend the Klock Property Planned Unit Development (PUD) for approval of a 42 38,300-square-foot medical office building and to rezone the property from PUD/Research and 43 Light Industrial Park (M1) to PUD/Professional Office (PO). The Klock Property PUD comprises 44 3.01 acres and is located on the north side of Burns Road approximately 1,200 feet east of the 45 intersection of N. Military Trail and Burns Road. 46 PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING Page 2 04-09-13 Chair Hansen opened the public hearing. 1 Petitioner: Brian Cheguis, Cotleur and Hearing. 2 Staff Presentation: Senior Planner, Kathryn DeWitt. 3 Public Comment: None. 4 Chair Hansen closed the public hearing. 5 Vice Chair, Douglas Pennell made a motion to approve PUDA-13-01-000048 Klock Property 6 Rezoning and PUD Amendment with 4 waivers and caviot regarding parking; please address 7 where the 9.5’ spaces and10’ spaces are located 8 Member Panczak seconded. 9 Motion passed 7-0. 10 3. Recommendation to City Council (Public Hearing) - QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARING 11 CUMJ-13-01-000027 - Gardens Business Center (Parcel 27.05/.06) Major Conditional Use 12 A request by Velocity Community Credit Union to amend a previously approved Major Conditional 13 Use in order to modify the site and landscape plans for the Gardens Business Center, to relocate an 14 existing drive-up ATM machine from the building’s north façade to the drive-through bypass lane, 15 and to relocate the after-hours depository box under the drive-through canopy. The subject site is 16 located at the northeast corner of Minsk Gardens Boulevard and PGA Boulevard. 17 Chair Hansen opened the public hearing. 18 Petitioner: Ann Booth, Urban Design Kilday Studios. 19 Staff Presentaion: Senior Planner, Peter Hofheinz. 20 Public comment: None. 21 Chair Hansen closed the public hearing. 22 Member Panczak made a motion to approve CUMJ-13-01-000027. 23 Member Roesnkranz seconded. 24 Motion passed 7-0. 25 VIII. OLD BUSINESS 26 None. 27 IX. NEW BUSINESS 28 None. 29 30 31 32 33 (The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.) 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING Page 3 04-09-13 X. ADJOURNMENT 1 Chair Hansen adjourned the meeting at 7:05 p.m. 2 The next regular meeting will be held on May 14, 2013. 3 Approved: 4 5 6 7 Randolph Hansen, Chair 8 9 10 11 Douglas Pennell, Vice Chair 12 13 14 15 Michael Panczak 16 17 18 19 Roma Josephs 20 21 22 23 Charles Hathaway 24 25 26 27 Howard Rosenkranz 28 29 30 31 Robert Savel 32 33 34 ATTEST: 35 36 ____________________ 37 Donna L. Kramer 38 Municipal Services Coordinator 39 40 Note: these minutes are prepared in compliance with 286.011 F.S. and are not verbatim transcripts 41 of the meeting. A verbatim audio recording is available on the City Website or from the Office of 42 the City Clerk. 43 All referenced attachments on file in the Office of the City Clerk. 44 Note: all those preparing to give testimony were sworn in. 45 The Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens is a member of the Charter Schools USA family of schools. Charter Schools USA (CSUSA) is one of the largest providers of charter school management services in the nation. CSUSA manages private and municipal charters for grades Pre -K through 12. Founded in 1997, CSUSA is one of the oldest, largest and fastest - growing education management companies in the United States with more than 4,000 employees educating more than 40,000 students. CSUSA schools produce some of the strongest academic gains in reading, writing and math in the nation based on state and federal standards. CSUSA currently operates 48 charter schools on 45 campuses in five states. One of CSUSA's greatest accomplishments is gaining a 95% plus satisfaction rate from parents and achieving a district "A" academic average for the last 6 years from the Department of Education. CSUSA has achieved outstanding results with all students— particularly low- income and minority students —that are significantly higher than the average academic achievement results for such students in the states in which it operates. Hispanic and Black students, English Language Learners and students who are economically disadvantaged — eligible for free or reduced lunch— outperformed students in the State of Florida on average by 11 percentage points in reading, 7 percentage points in mathematics, and 6 percentage points in writing each year for the past 8 years. Additionally, CSUSA continues to show higher performance than the state with White students and the Total population, outperforming the state on average by 6 percentage points in reading, 3 percentage points in mathematics, and 6 percentage points in writing. CSUSA Hispanic students' performance in reading, mathematics and writing outperformed the state by an average rate of 22% in reading, 11% in mathematics and 4% in writing. [Note: More information can be found at htto: / /www.charterschoolsusa.com /about- oerformance- overview /.] I ;�' Existing uses adjacent to the Property include: North: Meadow Brook residential community within PGA National, East: Vacant / Lot 6 of PGA National Commerce Park, South: Montessori School at PGA National West: PGA National Park SITE ACCESS Site access is provided via three (3) existing driveway connections with Hiatt Drive. No changes to the existing driveway connections are proposed. However, utilization of the driveways will be amended in accordance with an Operational Management Plan developed for RCSATG by Simmons & White. The Operational Plan, as discussed in detail therein, will provide for segregation of the school from the office use, and for effective and efficient site access and on -site circulation. Children riding their bikes and walking to school will be accommodated via the existing sidewalk system on Northlake Boulevard, as well as on the easterly and southerly right -of -way on Hiatt Drive. A crosswalk and pedestrian signal exists at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive. The sidewalk on the south side of Hiatt Drive terminates just to the west of the westerly school driveway connection. This sidewalk will be extended and a crosswalk will be constructed to direct school children walking and riding their bikes across Hiatt Drive onto the school property and directly north to the school entrance at the pick- up and drop -off area via a new, five (5) foot wide pedestrian sidewalk. This route is graphically represented on the Operational Plan and Queuing /Accumulation Analysis included in Appendix "A" of the enclosed Operational Management Plan prepared by Simmons & White. State certified crossing guards, trained staff and teachers will all be utilized to direct children to the school entrance. In addition to RCSATG, the existing professional office building on Lot 7 will remain. The applicant does not currently have a tenant for this building. However, based on staffs concerns regarding challenges associated with the office and school uses on the same site, the applicant will agree to limit the use of the office building to school - related functions only and no use that is not associated with the proposed school is requested. SITE DESIGN The two (2) buildings on the site have been previously constructed and there are no proposed changes to the basic footprints of the buildings. The Applicant is proposing minor site modifications associated with RCSATG's use of the property. These modifications include changes to parking and circulation, minor modifications around proposed exterior doors and entryways, and the creation of a tot lot and athletic field. The proposed modifications also include the "greening" of the former truck loading dock areas which are proposed to include open sodded areas planted with Royal Poinciana and Live Oak trees. This area will also accommodate the mechanical equipment required for RCSATG which will be enclosed within an eight (8) foot high chain link fence and fully screened from view with landscaping. Please refer to the enclosed site and landscape plans for additional details. USE OF CITY'S ATHLETIC FIELDS It is the desire of CSUSA to utilize the City's athletic fields within the adjacent PGA National Park as part of the Project. The adjacency of the proposed RCSATG to the park provides an excellent opportunity to cross - utilize the fields for general public and public school recreation purposes which would allow sharing in the cost of maintenance and improvements to the fields. The Applicant has shown a potential cross - access connection point to the adjacent park on the proposed site plan and desires further discussion with City C "Wye M II wig Rei RIM • k I J I k • submitted for the City's review. Site drainage will remain substantially unchanged. The Applicant proposes to make minor modifications associated with the reconfiguration of existing circulation and parking areas. Please refer to the conceptual engineering plan submitted herewith. Additionally, the applicant has enclosed a drainage statement prepared by Simmons & White Engineering with this submittal. UTILITIES Existing utility connections will remain substantially unchanged. The Applicant proposes to make minor modifications to the existing water distribution system for the purposes of providing adequate domestic water and fire suppression for Building #1. Additionally, the Applicant is proposing to install a 750 gallon grease trap which will service the school's warming kitchen. PROJECT SIGNAGE There is an existing monument sign located at the southwest entrance to the property from Hiatt Drive which will be utilized for RCSATG. An existing monument sign located at the southeast entrance to the property from Hiatt Drive will be utilized by the future occupant of the existing professional office building. The applicant is proposing one (1) wall sign on the south elevation of the west wing of Building #1 to identify RCSATG. • • 1.•. • The Project is required to have two (2) loading spaces. There are three (3) existing loading spaces on the site which will remain. CSUSA has developed and perfected a sophisticated pick -up and drop -off procedure at its schools which will also be incorporated at RCSATG, including a state of the art FOB system. Parents picking up and dropping off their children will enter the easterly driveway and utilize two (2) inbound lanes that extend along the easterly property buffer and expand to three (3) lanes at the northeast corner of the school. The three (3) queuing lanes wrap along the north and west sides of the school to the location at the main entrance at the southwest corner where students will be picked up and dropped off. Students will exit the building from the west side of the west wing of the building as they are called upon via the FOB system as their parents enter the stacking queue for pick -up. The queue will accommodate up to 225 vehicles, which represents the entire 225 car queue that would be required if every vehicle for drop off or pick up were on site at the exact same time. A queuing /accumulation analysis plan for the student pick -up / drop -off area has been included as Appendix "A" to the Operational Management Plan by Simmons & White submitted herewith. PROPOSED OFF -SITE TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS Dual southbound left turn lanes will be constructed with 250' of storage and 100' of taper as required prior to the first day of the second school year as shown on the Hiatt Drive Off -Site Improvement Plans enclosed with this submittal. The intersection of Northiake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive is expected to operate within acceptable levels of service during the first school year based on a student enrollment limitation of 675 students. A westbound right turn lane cannot be constructed on Northlake Boulevard at Hiatt Drive within the existing right -of -way. The existing improvements on the Chatsworth property prohibit the dedication of additional right -of -way. The following items should be noted: b. The Renaissance Charter School of the Gardens onsite queuing provides for a total of 225 cars, or 100% of the required peak hour queue at project build -out with 1140 students. The school has over 1500 feet of storage /throat length dedicated to onsite queuing. The entrance to the school is 1000' feet away from Northlake Boulevard on Hiatt Drive. Based on these facts, no back -up of school traffic is expected to effect the availability of westbound vehicles on Northlake Boulevard to make a right turn onto Hiatt Drive. c. The existing westbound through volume on Northlake Boulevard during the A.M. peak hour is very low due to the highly directional characteristics of the roadway. d. Although the posted speed limit on Northlake Boulevard at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard at Hiatt Drive is 55 mph and the intersection is located at the base of the Turnpike overpass, over three times the required stopping sight distance exists and the back of queue at project build -out at full enrollment is well outside the required stopping distance. e. A comprehensive safety analysis was conducted for the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive to determine if any historical crash patterns indicated the need for an exclusive right turn lane at Hiatt Drive. A total of 12 documented crashes during a 3 -year period were provided by the Palm Beach Gardens Police Department and a total of 6 crashes during the same 3 -year period were obtained from the Palm Beach County Traffic Division (8 documented accident reports were provided by Palm Beach County, however, close review revealed two were outside the intersection). Of the 12 documented accidents in a 3 -year period, none of them are indicative of the need for an exclusive westbound right turn lane on Northlake Boulevard at Hiatt Drive. There were no rear -end crashes at the intersection in the two northerly most through lanes on the easterly approach. The results of the crash data and associated analysis demonstrated that there were no accidents or incidents /crashes due to the absence of a westbound right turn lane. threshold Site Plan Amendment & Major Conditional Use hour. This is applicable to unsignalized driveways and is not applicable to r intersection of Boulevard and Hiatt Drive, As stated above, . - applicable Level of Service Standards for Palm Beach County (as indicated by the two reviews and two approvals from Palm Beach County Traffic Division) and also meets the only applicable Level of Service Standard of the City of Palm Beach Gardens Code Section 78- 624 - Intersection Standards (b) Intersection Standards. "For purposes of the Intersection Standards compliance with the Level of Service "D" Standards shall be established using the methodology obtained in the latest edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)." WAIVER REQUEST The Applicant respectfully requests approval of the following waiver from the standards of the LDR's: Code Reauirement: Section 78 -313 requires a maximum of 40% sod within the landscape area. Requested Waiver: The proposed amount of sod within the Project comprises a total of 56.8 %. The applicant is requesting a deviation of 16.8 %. Justification: Due to the nature of the proposed use of the Property as a school, the Applicant desires to maintain a higher percentage of open sodded areas for students and activities. Additionally, open lawn areas provide good visibility which increases the RCSATG staffs ability to maintain security and safety for the children who will be on the site. . rome 111,MTO applicable Level of Service Standards for Palm Beach County (as indicated by the two reviews and two approvals from Palm Beach County Traffic Division) and also meets the only applicable Level of Service Standard of the City of Palm Beach Gardens Code Section 78- 624 - Intersection Standards (b) Intersection Standards. "For purposes of the Intersection Standards compliance with the Level of Service "D" Standards shall be established using the methodology obtained in the latest edition of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM)." WAIVER REQUEST The Applicant respectfully requests approval of the following waiver from the standards of the LDR's: Code Reauirement: Section 78 -313 requires a maximum of 40% sod within the landscape area. Requested Waiver: The proposed amount of sod within the Project comprises a total of 56.8 %. The applicant is requesting a deviation of 16.8 %. Justification: Due to the nature of the proposed use of the Property as a school, the Applicant desires to maintain a higher percentage of open sodded areas for students and activities. Additionally, open lawn areas provide good visibility which increases the RCSATG staffs ability to maintain security and safety for the children who will be on the site. . rome 111,MTO Justification: Due to the nature of the proposed use of the Property as a school, the Applicant desires to maintain a higher percentage of open sodded areas for students and activities. Additionally, open lawn areas provide good visibility which increases the RCSATG staffs ability to maintain security and safety for the children who will be on the site. . rome 111,MTO b. Shall connect to public water and sewer treatment systems, or other systems approved by the city and the county health department. The project is connected to the public water and sewer treatment system. Additionally, the existing water and sewer lines are adequately sized to accommodate the change in use from industrial to school. c. Shall be approved as a major conditional use. .. , d. Shall conform to all applicable environmental standards and requirements. The proposed project conforms to all applicable environmental standards and requirements. Given the previous industrial use on the Property, METOMEM= Shall dedicate, . cost, any - - or - for oa canals, - - - . . fit two ON MMMIN.F. . �F, 8 �84 Criteria for Conditional Uses: Schools, Public or Private Section 78 -52(d) of the City's land Development Regulations establishes criteria with which all applications for major conditional uses must comply. Said criteria are listed below followed by the applicant's demonstration of compliance of the proposed School use in bold italics typeface. (1) Comprehensive plan. The proposed use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. As demonstrated by the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan cited below, the proposed use is consistent with and furthers the City's Comprehensive Plan. ❖ Future Land Use Element Policy 1.1.3.6.2. (d)s Schools ...shall be considered public uses, and be allowed within areas designated industrial (IND). o The school is proposed to be located on property designated industrial (IND). MTV MOM f • 1 I 0- 7=77TM (2) Chapter requirements. The proposed use is consistent with all applicable requirements of this chapter. As evidenced in the previous section of this narrative and on the enclosed site plan, the proposed use meets all applicable requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations, with the exception of one (1) waiver for the amount of proposed sod area. (3) Standards. The proposed use is consistent with the standards for such use as provided in section 78 -159. As evidenced in the previous section of this narrative, the proposed use is consistent with the additional standards for Schools.. Public or Private contained in Section 78459 of the City's Land Development Regulations. (4) Public welfare. The proposed use provides for the public health, safety, and welfare by: a. Providing for a safe and effective means of pedestrian access; .. Site Plan Amendment & Major Conditional Use As noted on the revised site plan being submitted herewith, the Applicant has agreed ,. non - project traffic along Hiatt Drive is not impeded during the peak school drop -off and pick= up hours. The installation of the turn lane will provide for an adequate roadway system adjacent to and in front of the project site. This is in addition to the on -site circulation that will provide for 100% stacking of the maximum number of vehicles anticipated during peak hour drop off and pick up. d. Providing for safe and efficient onsite traffic circulation, parking, and overall control; and As evidenced in the Operational Management Plan prepared by Simmons & White being submitted herewith, the project team went to great lengths to ensure that safe and efficient onsite traffic circulation, parking and overall control were being provided as part of the project. Please refer to said Operational Management Plan for a detailed description of the Plan for onsite traffic circulation, parking and overall control. e. Providing adequate access for public safety purposes, including fire and police protection. (6) Utilities. The proposed use minimizes or eliminates the impact of utility installation, including underground and overhead utilities, on adjacent properties. This site is already serviced by all necessary utilities, and the school use will require no significant utility upgrades. There are no capacity problems for the standard utilities at this location. (7) Dimensional standards. The proposed use meets or exceeds all dimensional requirements required by the chapter. (8) Neighborhood plans. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, and standards of neighborhood plans. (10) Patterns of development. The proposed use will result in logical, timely, and orderly development patterns. The proposed use will result in an orderly development pattern as the school will provide for the re -use of an existing building with a use compatible with the surrounding development. (11) Purpose and intent. The proposed use will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter and the goals, objectives, and policies of the city. The proposed use will be Development Regulations the proposed schooPs chi. owners. Furthermore, as harmony with the City's Comprehensive Plan. in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the City's Land by providing for the health, safety and welfare of (1) the public; (2) Wren, teachers and parents; and (3) adjacent and nearby property evidenced in the response to Item 1 above, the proposed use is in the goals, objectives, and policies as established in the City's (12) Adverse impact. The design of the proposed use and structures will minimize any adverse visual impacts or impacts caused by the intensity of the use. proposed (13) Environmental impact, The design of the C RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL AT PALM BEACH GARDENS JOHNSTON GROUP SIMMONS & WHITE 5601 Corporate Way, Suite 200 West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 0 561.478.7848 1 F 561.478.3738 www.simmonsandwhite.com Certificate of Authorization Number 3452 SIMMONS, WHITE ENGINEERING I PLANNING I CONSULTING I SINCE 1982 OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT PLAN RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL AT THE GARDENS Job No. 12 -096 Date: 03/11/2013 Revised: 04/25/2013 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA e s+ -- ra ki umX F� 00o 14 APR 0922 1.0 INTRODUCTION......... ..... 0 ......... 3 2.0 PROJECTED ENROLLMENT, Palo 0 woovasm loalmlowupgo m 0 Boom a as a 0 10 STAGGERED START TIMES .............................................. ..............................4 4.0 TRAFFIC GENERATI ON ...........................................0......... ..............................5 5.0 DRIVEWAY SUMMARYAND USE CLASSIFICATION ....... ..............................6 .0 OFFICE/SCHOOL SEPARATION OF USE AND PARKING.,... .... volkwomsm RABB sammmuffm 7 7.0 DELIVERIES......... ..............................7 8.0 BUSES ............................................................................... ............................... 7 9.0 SIBLINGS ............................................. ............................... 7 10.0 PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLE RIDERS",',, No olulammm, larm 7 11.0 ONSITE QUEUING AND COMPREHENSIVE TRAFFIC CONTROL................. 8 13.0 NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD WESTBOUND RIGHT TURN LANE,. affosegm am Damon am 11 FMJMMA #j- •T IS • 15.0 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS ............................................. .............................15 16.0 PARENTAL RESPONSI BI LITIES ....................................... .............................15 17.0 CONCLUSION .................................................................... .............................16 Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 i�71���:Z•7�I�I•��[!]�I Page 13 Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens is located on the north side of Hiatt Drive, just north of Northlake Boulevard in the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida and contains approximately 10.3 acres. The Property Control Number for the parcel is 52- 42- 42- 15 -38- 000 -0070. The site is currently fully developed with a 61,317 S.F. distribution /office /warehouse facility and a 26,000 S.F. professional /general office building. Proposed site modifications consist of converting the existing distribution /office /warehouse facility to an 1140 capacity student charter school (K -8). Charter Schools USA has finalized a contract with the Palm Beach County School Board to operate a charter school at this location effective in the 2013 -2014 school year for an initial term of 15 years. The currently developed property has three existing driveway connections to Hiatt Drive, all of which are full access, ingress and egress driveways. The proposed plan of development consists of modifying the existing driveways to limit the easterly most driveway to an ingress only for school drop -off and pick- up, maintaining the central driveway as an ingress /egress for the existing office building (and limited parents or visitors that must park and enter the school), and utilizing the westerly driveway as an egress only during peak drop -off and pick -up timeframes. The westerly driveway will serve as an ingress and egress driveway during off -peak time periods. For additional information concerning site location, layout and operational details, please refer to the Operational Plan, Queuing and Accumulation Analysis prepared by Simmons & White, Inc. attached as Appendix „A„ The purpose of this report is to provide an Operational Plan detailing the school's proposed operations, onsite queuing and circulation, state of the art FOB pick -up system, as well as to present solutions to mitigate project impacts and minimize the effects to surrounding Palm Beach County thoroughfares as well as the directly accessed roadway, Hiatt Drive. As stated above, the school is proposed to ultimately have a total enrollment potential of 1140 students in grades Kindergarten through 8th Grade at project build -out. This enrollment is estimated to begin with a lower first year student count of approximately 675 students growing to the maximum of 1140 students over five years as follows: ` • - • • • -r School Year Grade Levels Total Student Enrollment First Year K -6 675 Second Year K -7 903 Third Year K -8 1076 Fourth Year K -8 1099 Fifth Year K -8 1140 Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 Page 14 The maximum student enrollment at project build -out is limited at 1140, the actual maximum enrollment during the ramp up years may vary slightly. It should be noted that the above estimated student enrollment is based on ramp up schedules from other existing Renaissance Schools and may vary slightly. It is important to note that the first year enrollment of approximately 60% of the total enrollment will allow for significant operational observations and mitigation opportunities during the ramp up years. As will be discussed in subsequent sections of this report, the overall Operational Plan and onsite circulation design is based on the full 1140 student enrollment. A detailed review of the school operations was performed with specific emphasis on Hiatt Drive and the intersection of Hiatt Drive and Northlake Boulevard. In order to minimize the operational impacts during the morning and evening peak hours, the school has developed and will implement a plan to segregate operations to elongate the arrival and departure periods (staggered start /departure time for older and younger students, as well as morning care and aftercare). Approximately 20% of the students are anticipated to use morning care and aftercare with arrival times of approximately 6:30 — 7:30 AM and 3:30 — 6:00 PM, respectively. Grades K -4 representing approximately 40% of the students will have morning drop -off times of 8:30 — 9:00 AM and afternoon pick- up times of 3:00 — 3:30 PM. Grades 5 -8 representing the remaining 40% of the students will have morning drop -off times at 7:30 — 8:00 AM and afternoon pick- up of 2:30 — 3:00 PM. The following summary applies: Aftercare Morning Care (20 %) Grades K -4 (40 %) Grades 5 -8 (40 %) Drop -Off: 6:30 AM — 7:30 AM 8:30 AM — 9:00 AM 7:30 AM — 8:00 AM Pick -Up: 3:30 PM — 6:00 PM 3:00 PM — 3:30 PM 2:30 PM — 3:00 PM Extracurricular activities, sporting events, parent meetings, and other gatherings that take place at the school will be organized to minimize offsite traffic impacts. Each activity will be carefully planned using an RSVP attendance policy and will intentionally limit to a specific number that correspond to both onsite parking as well as specific traffic management procedures. Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 A" / � a��[ CIVT M: T Page 15 A comprehensive Traffic Impact Statement for the Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens in the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida has been prepared by Simmons & White, Inc. dated November 30, 2012 (with revisions) and has been approved by the Palm Beach County Traffic Division on February 20, 2013. A copy of the Palm Beach County approval letter is attached in Appendix "B" with this analysis. The traffic to be generated by the proposed 1140 student K -8 charter school and the 26,000 S.F. of general office area may be summarized as follows: Daily Traffic Generation = 3253 tpd A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Generation (IN /OUT) = 1084 pht (615 IN/469 OUT) P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Generation (IN /OUT) = 280 pht (113 IN/167 OUT) It should be noted that the above traffic generation is for the full student enrollment and does not represent the proposed staggered start times. As discussed in Section 3.0 of this report, the students start time is to be staggered to facilitate staggered queuing of vehicles to greatly reduce impacts on the surrounding roadway network. Also discussed in Section 3.0, the staggered start times will allow for the reduction in the overall AM and PM peak hour turning movements at the project driveways. The actual anticipated volumes at the proiect driveways for the full 1140 student enrollment assuming staggered start times may be summarized as follows: A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Generation (IN /OUT) = 1090 pht (620 IN/470 OUT) P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Generation (IN /OUT) = 287 pht (114 IN/173 OUT) First year enrollment will also utilize staggered start time and is estimated to begin with a lower first year student count of approximately 675 students. The traffic to be generated by 675 students as well as full 26,000 S.F. of professional office space may be calculated as follows: A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Generation (IN /OUT) = 671 pht (390 IN/282 OUT) P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Generation (IN /OUT) = 198 pht (72 IN/126 OUT) It should be noted that the PM peak hour volumes are based on the 4:00 — 6:00 PM time period of the adjacent roadways and not of the peak hour of the school. The Turning Movement Worksheet attached with this analysis represents the maximum turning movements anticipated to occur in the morning peak hour which coincides with the onsite office peak hour and the surrounding properties along Hiatt Drive morning peak hours. In summary, the AM peak hour traffic generation represents the most intense time period and will be utilized to address the peak scenario. Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 Page 16 As stated in previous sections of this report, the three existing driveway connections currently serving the site are to remain in place and essentially unchanged. The previous onsite use consisted of a distribution center with office and warehouse uses. The site generated a large amount of semi tractor trailer trips to and from the parcel. All three driveways are commercial drives with large entering and exiting radii, easily accommodating the previous tractor trailer traffic. The proposed Renaissance Charter School will utilize the three existing drives, however they will be modified as noted below during peak drop -off and pick -up hours. The easterly most driveway (formerly ingress /egress) will be converted to ingress only and will serve as the primary access for parents dropping off and picking up students. This commercial driveway is anticipated to have 1596 daily trips at full 1140 student enrollment as shown on the Turning Movement Worksheet attached with this analysis as Appendix "C ". This driveway is therefore classified as an intermediate driveway (ADT volumes of 501 trips to 2000 trips) and requires a 50' throat length. The driveway currently has approximately a 35' throat length /reservoir length, however, during the peak drop -off and pick -up times the first two internal driveways associated with the onsite office use will be taken out of service utilizing traffic control cones, providing over 500 of throat length /reservoir length. The central driveway has an anticipated ADT at project build -out of 321 trips per day and is classified as a minor driveway (0 to 500 trips per day) requiring a 25' throat /reservoir length. The available reservoir length is over 30'. Limited school traffic will be utilizing this driveway during peak hours, consisting only of parents and visitors that need to enter the school office. All other student drop -off and pick -up will utilize the easternmost driveway for ingress as discussed above. The westernmost driveway will be utilized for egress only during peak drop -off and pick -up periods, and is anticipated to have an ADT volume of 1383 exiting trips during the peak period. Though the 1383 ADT results in an "intermediate" driveway classification requiring a 50' throat, this driveway is limited to egress only where throat/reservoir lengths are not applicable. This driveway will also be utilized for ingress and egress at off -peak periods, however, off -peak volumes are expected to be negligible. Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 Page ( 7 This Section deleted based on Applicant's agreement to a Condition of Approval limiting the 26,000 S.F. office use to ancillary school uses. rl� The charter school contracts with vendors for food service, trash pick -up and book delivery. Book deliveries typically occur prior to the start of the school year, so this will not impact traffic operations. The food service provider is "Preferred Meals" who services all Renaissance schools. The school has invested significant infrastructure to accommodate this vendor, as large freezers are necessary onsite to hold the frozen food, and it is therefore anticipated this will be a long relationship. Frozen deliveries are made 2 -3 times a week, at the school's request. This is also true for contracted trash pick -up. Deliveries are scheduled to avoid peak drop -off and pick -up hours. These deliveries are made prior to 7:00 AM or after 4:00 PM and will be coordinated and /or modified during the school year as necessary to avoid conflicts with drop -off and pick -up, and to eliminate associated impacts. DKIINEMW No buses are planned to be utilized for the dropped off by private vehicle during staggered carpool and ride sharing registration program. school. School children will be start times utilizing an extensive Students who have a sibling in school are provided supervision, at no cost to parents, for the additional hour and may be dropped -off and /or released together. This allows parents to arrive only once for student drop -off and pick -up, further reducing the number of cars stacking onsite. Children riding their bikes and walking to school will be accommodated via the existing sidewalk system on Northlake Boulevard, as well as on the easterly and southerly right -of -way on Hiatt Drive. A crosswalk and pedestrian signal is existing at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive. The sidewalk on the south side of Hiatt Drive terminates just to the west of the westerly school driveway connection. This sidewalk will be extended and a crosswalk will be constructed to direct school children walking and riding their bikes across Hiatt Drive onto the school property and directly north to the school entrance at the pick -up and drop -off area. This route is graphically represented on the Operational Plan and Queuing /Accumulation Analysis included in Appendix "A" of this report. State certified crossing guards, trained staff and teachers will all be utilized to direct children to the school entrance. Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 Page 18 The Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens is committed to ensuring the drop -off and pick -up procedures flow efficiently and eliminate congestion on the adjacent Hiatt Drive and the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive. Unprecedented efforts have been made with the reconfiguration of this site to eliminate traffic congestion and all negative impacts on the commercial neighbors along Hiatt Drive within the PGA National Commerce Park. Extensive site planning and detailed analysis have been performed to eliminate the potential for adverse impacts and to ensure that unrestricted access for ambulances and emergency vehicles attending to the residents of the Chatsworth Assisted Living Facility is available. Although the Phase I enrollment is expected to be approximately 675 students, the overall full enrollment of 1140 students has been analyzed with regard to the onsite queuing and traffic management operations. A comprehensive Queuing /Accumulation Analysis Graphic has been prepared and is attached in Appendix "A" with this report graphically representing a 225 car queue leading to the drop -off and pick -up area. As shown on the attached Turning Movement Worksheet in Appendix "C ", the anticipated peak hour left turns at the school drop -off and pick -up peak periods is anticipated to be 225 vehicles. In an effort to mitigate off -site congestion and neighborhood concerns from within the PGA National Commerce Park, the site has been designed to accommodate the entire peak hour traffic in one onsite queue. In other words, the entire 225 vehicle peak hour traffic may be accommodated at one time in the onsite queue which is unprecedented at any other known similar educational facility in Palm Beach County. It is important to note that the Phase I enrollment of approximately 675 is anticipated to generate a queue of only 133 peak hour vehicles, while the full 225 vehicle queue will be available immediately upon the opening of the first school year. Peak drop -off and pick -up time period onsite operations will be managed by a state of the art FOB system and trained staff members who will arrive at the site and depart from the site at off -peak time periods. 225 queue spaces are provided onsite with double and triple stacking and queuing around the entire easterly, northerly and westerly perimeter to maximize the efficiency, the operations and to completely eliminate the potential for queuing out onto Hiatt Drive. The proposed staggered start times and onsite queuing and operations are anticipated to accommodate the arrival and departure of students smoothly and efficiently in accordance with the established procedures that are in effect at other Renaissance Charter Schools currently in operation. Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 Page 19 r a Bill ;• s r Parents scan their assigned FOB at the card reader (which reads the FOB and provides a feed -back "beep" and LED flash in less than 1 second) and the vehicle proceeds in the queue pattern with virtually no delay. Upon the scanning of the FOB, the system alerts the appropriate classroom teacher by displaying the student's name and time of parent arrival on smart screens, laptops and other displays. Teachers then direct the students to the loading area and indicate in the system that the student has been dismissed from the classroom. Students arrive at the pick -up area as the queuing process is proceeding and are loaded into the vehicles by trained staff and teachers in accordance with the procedure described below. In addition to the FOB system, school operations will utilize approximately 3 staff members and 2 State certified crossing guards, and 5 or more additional teachers at the drop- off /pick -up area as follows (please refer to the Operational Plan attached with this report for the staff locations and additional details): Staff Member 1 and Teachers A -E — In both drop -off and pick -up, a highly assisted loading and unloading approach is utilized in conjunction with a state of the art FOB system. Doors are opened, children are assisted, and doors are closed with assistance from staff positioned all along the drop -off and pick -up lanes. The parent pick -up procedures are designed to ensure safety and efficiency. Depending on initial process and observed operations, up to 8 teachers /administrators are directly involved in the process of directing children, cars and traffic. The grouping of children and utilization of FOB's for each parent ensures a smooth and organized process. As shown on the attached Operational Plan, the drop -off area is extended on the southwesterly side of the building and will accommodate 31 cars triple- stacked at one time. This number may increase or decrease based on the efficiency of the operation. The 31 car drop -off area has been established based on a typical 4 minute loading /unloading time period and a 225 car peak queue (at full enrollment) to be accommodated within 30 minutes. Staff Members 2 and 3 — Staff Members 2 and 3 will release the platoon of 31 vehicles following the loading and unloading of the children. These two employees will ensure the smooth transition from three lanes in the drop -off area to two lanes exiting the site. These two staff members will also assist children and parents during drop -off and pick -up. The exiting platoon consists of up to 31 cars, while the onsite storage area prior to exiting the site can accommodate over 40 cars. Crossing Guard 4 — A State certified crossing guard will be located at the crosswalk to assist children crossing Hiatt Drive. This staff member will also assist in having school traffic yield to existing Commerce Park traffic entering and exiting adjacent driveways. Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 Page 110 Crossing Guard 5 — A State certified intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt. crossing guard will be located at the Hiatt Drive to assist children in crossing In summary, the onsite queuing has been established to provide an unprecedented 100% of the peak hour vehicles queued onsite simultaneously. The FOB system and "triple- stack" vehicular pick -up and drop -off area is an established, effective program that is currently in use at other Renaissance Charter Schools. The 31 car drop -off has been established based on a 4 minute loading /unloading period for the 225 vehicle queue to occur in 30 minutes or less, consistent with other Renaissance Charter School operations. The entire 31 car platoon may exit the drop- off /pick -up area and be stored onsite prior to release onto Hiatt Drive in order to accommodate and prioritize emergency vehicles. As stated above, the school is committed to ensure the drop -off and pick -up procedures flow efficiently and eliminate congestion on the adjacent Hiatt Drive and the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive. The lower first year enrollment of 675 students will allow for monitoring of the traffic operations and provide the opportunity to implement measures as required in a coordinated effort with the City of Palm Beach Gardens and the PGA National Commerce Park Association to ensure safer operations, emergency vehicle access, and eliminate congestion during the peak drop -off and pick -up time periods. As shown on the attached Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Queuing /Accumulation Analysis and Operational Plan in Appendix "A ", a left turn lane is graphically shown to be constructed on Hiatt Drive at the easterly school driveway connection. This conceptual plan graphically shows the modification of the striping on Hiatt Drive and the widening of the roadway to accommodate an exclusive left turn lane to the project site. This modification will allow for school traffic to be completely separated from other PGA National Commerce Park traffic and emergency vehicle traffic. It is important to note, however, that 100% of the peak hour vehicles can be queued and stored on the Renaissance Charter School site, and no back -up of vehicles onto Hiatt Drive is anticipated. It is also important to note that during the AM peak hour drop -off period, negligible westbound Commerce Park traffic exists to conflict with eastbound turning school traffic into the queue lanes. Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 Page 111 Because only 134 vehicles are expected to arrive during the peak drop -off and pick -up time periods for the first school year (approximately 675 students) and because 225 cars may be queued onsite upon the opening of the school, it is suggested that no turn lane be required for the first school year. The school will, however, strive to have the exclusive turn lane constructed prior to the opening of the school, and will commit to a Condition of Approval to have the turn lane constructed prior to the first day of the second school year. The westbound right turn volume from Northlake Boulevard to Hiatt Drive has been reviewed. For the full enrollment of 1140 students at project build -out, approximately 205 right turns are expected to be generated by the school and office project during the highest peak hour. This most intense period is expected to occur during the AM peak hour. The field review of the intersection revealed that right -of -way is not available for the construction of a westbound right turn lane at Hiatt Drive and the adjacent property is fully developed (Chatsworth at Devonshire within the PGA National Commerce Park). As part of the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards review, this intersection (including all the project traffic and background traffic reflecting full enrollment) was required to be analyzed. Based on the intersection analysis required under the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards review (the report has been approved and a copy of the approval letter has been attached with this report in Appendix "B "), a westbound right turn lane is not required to meet the applicable intersection level of service standards. Because the site design for the Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens allows for 100% of the required peak hour queue to be accommodated onsite, and because the entrance to the school is over 1000' away from Northlake Boulevard along Hiatt Drive, no back -up of school traffic is expected to affect the availability of westbound vehicles on Northlake Boulevard to make a right turn onto Hiatt Drive. It should also be noted that the existing westbound through volume on Northlake Boulevard during the AM peak hour is very low due to the highly directional characteristics of the roadway. During the AM peak hour when the peak of the school and the peak of Northlake Boulevard coincide, the westbound roadway volumes are extremely low. While the westbound PM peak hour traffic on Northlake Boulevard is higher, the majority of the school traffic arrives and departs in the early afternoon prior to the commencement of the Northlake Boulevard PM peak hour time periods. Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 k I :• 11 111 1 111 1 1,111 11 U N 1;. Page 112 Several field reviews of intersection operations at Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive have been performed to observe the speeds, volumes and operational characteristics of the intersection. Although the posted speed limit on Northlake Boulevard at this intersection is 55 mph and the intersection is located at the base of the Turnpike overpass, adequate stopping site distance exists and the intersection has been shown to operate within the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards at project build -out with the inclusion of 100% of the total 1140 student enrollment. Based on safety concerns expressed by Palm Beach Garden's staff, a safety analysis was conducted for the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive to determine if any historical crash patterns were present. Crash data was obtained from the Palm Beach Gardens Police Department for the subject intersection for years 2010, 2011 and 2012. A total of twelve (12) documented accidents during the three -year period are attributed to the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive: 4 in 2010, 5 in 2011, and 3 in 2012. The accident types were: • 4 Rear end crashes • 2 Left turn crashes • 2 Out of control crashes • 1 Angle crash • 1 Backing crash • 1 Sideswipe crash • 1 Other crash Failure to yield right of way (3 crashes — 25 %) and careless driving (5 crashes — 42 %) were the two highest contributing causes documented in the crash data. Table 1 shows the crash statistic calculations for the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive during years 2010, 2011, and 2012. Average crash rates for a suburban, 6 -lane, two -way divided with raised median with four legs, as used by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), was used in computing the crash calculations. FDOT crash data indicates that the average crash rate per million vehicles is 0.392 for similar intersections in Palm Beach County. The average crash rate per million vehicles experienced over the three - year period for the subject intersection was 0.360. Therefore, the intersection of Northlake Boulevard at Hiatt Drive experienced less crashes during the three - year period than what could be expected from similar intersections. Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 areTOWNURTIMEAM Page (13 Ar AADT — Average Annual Daily Traffic Actual Crash Rate (ACR) = No. of crashes in a year / [(No. of vehicles (AADT) * 365) / 1,000,000] *AADT was determined by utilizing 24 -hour approach counts conducted by PBC on 12/04/12 and applying a peak season correction factor ** Based on SUBURBAN 6 +LN 2WY DIVD RASD, Palm Beach (93) Based on the obtained crash data and the analysis documented within this report, there are no safety concerns based on actual documented data at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive. Furthermore, the crash data was specifically reviewed and analyzed for crash patterns that could indicate a need for a westbound right turn lane onto Hiatt Drive. The results of the crash data and associated analysis demonstrated that there were no accidents or incidents /crashes due to the absence of a westbound right turn lane. A collision diagram and the crash reports obtained from the Palm Beach Gardens Police Department are included in Appendix D. A traffic operational analysis at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive was performed in the approved Traffic Impact Statement. The results of the analysis demonstrated that the intersection will continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service at project build -out with full enrollment. Additionally, the results showed that there will be sufficient capacity for the westbound approach for both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. The absence of any historical crash patterns at the subject intersection and particularly the westbound approach in combination with the traffic operational analysis demonstrating that the intersection will continue to operate at acceptable Level of Service standards with the proposed project indicates that intersection safety will not deteriorate. Actual Crash Rate Average Crash Rate for Year Number of AADT* (ACR) per million Similar Intersections ** Crashes vehicles (crashes per million vehicles) 2010 4 30,400 0.360 0.392 2011 5 301400 0.451 0.392 2012 3 30,400 0.270 0.392 Averse 4 30,400 0.360 0.392 AADT — Average Annual Daily Traffic Actual Crash Rate (ACR) = No. of crashes in a year / [(No. of vehicles (AADT) * 365) / 1,000,000] *AADT was determined by utilizing 24 -hour approach counts conducted by PBC on 12/04/12 and applying a peak season correction factor ** Based on SUBURBAN 6 +LN 2WY DIVD RASD, Palm Beach (93) Based on the obtained crash data and the analysis documented within this report, there are no safety concerns based on actual documented data at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive. Furthermore, the crash data was specifically reviewed and analyzed for crash patterns that could indicate a need for a westbound right turn lane onto Hiatt Drive. The results of the crash data and associated analysis demonstrated that there were no accidents or incidents /crashes due to the absence of a westbound right turn lane. A collision diagram and the crash reports obtained from the Palm Beach Gardens Police Department are included in Appendix D. A traffic operational analysis at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive was performed in the approved Traffic Impact Statement. The results of the analysis demonstrated that the intersection will continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service at project build -out with full enrollment. Additionally, the results showed that there will be sufficient capacity for the westbound approach for both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. The absence of any historical crash patterns at the subject intersection and particularly the westbound approach in combination with the traffic operational analysis demonstrating that the intersection will continue to operate at acceptable Level of Service standards with the proposed project indicates that intersection safety will not deteriorate. Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 Page 114 Notwithstanding all of the above, the Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens is committed to the ongoing monitoring and implementation of required mitigation measures as the school grows. As stated in the Palm Beach County Traffic Impact Statement Approval Letter from Alan Ennis dated March 27, 2013, the Applicant will agree to a Condition of Approval for the installation of an advanced warning sign with flasher on Northlake Boulevard to slow westbound drivers and alert them of the signalized intersection west of the Turnpike overpass. r • z• - - The intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive has been analyzed in accordance with the requirements of the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards and is found to meet the required level of service standards at project build -out. As stated in Section 8.0 Onsite Queuing and Comprehensive Traffic Control of this report, the school is committed to minimizing the traffic impacts on Hiatt Drive for the tenants and owners within the PGA National Commerce Park. The traffic signal at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive currently has an allotted green time of 30 seconds per cycle for the southbound left turn based on a 120 second A.M. peak hour cycle length and a 110 second P.M. peak hour cycle length. The school's pick -up and drop -off procedure will accommodate 31 vehicles at one time every four minutes, or 31 cars for every 2 cycles of the traffic cycle. The comprehensive onsite Queuing /Accumulations Analysis and Operational Plan has been based on providing the necessary onsite queuing and drop - off /pick -up volume to ensure maximum efficiency and minimum congestion and delay on Hiatt Drive and at the signalized intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive. As stated in the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards approval letter, the County is willing to work in a coordinated effort with the City and the school to modify the signal timing as required: "Upon observing /encountering the need, contact the County Traffic Division Signal Timing Engineer Steven Shreve, P.E. to make potential signal timing changes at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard at Hiatt Drive ". The school will commit to a Condition of Approval to coordinate with the City of Palm Beach Gardens Engineer regarding the existing geometry of Hiatt Drive and the need to reconfigure the southbound lanes to provide for dual left turn lanes (and associated signal modifications). Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 Page 115 A lower first year enrollment of approximately 675 students will allow for the monitoring of the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive and will provide an opportunity to implement mitigation measures at the intersection as required in a coordinated effort with the City of Palm Beach Gardens to ensure safe operations and reduce congestion during the peak drop -off and pick -up time periods. If determined to be required by the City Engineer, the school will commit to a Condition of Approval to have the dual left turn lanes and signal modifications constructed prior to the first day of the second school year. Members of the PGA National Commerce Park Association have indicated that the Chatsworth Assisted Living Facility which is located in the Commerce Park frequently has ambulances and emergency vehicles attending to the residents of that facility and hampering access to the facility is dangerous and even potentially life threatening. As stated in numerous portions of this report, the Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens acknowledges that emergency access is critical within the Commerce Park. The school has implemented site design features and an Operational Plan to minimize congestion and maximize emergency access. School site modifications allow for an unprecedented 100% of the school pick -up and drop -off queue to be stored onsite at one time. No other school this size in Palm Beach County, public or private, is known to be able to accommodate 100% of the required queue onsite at one time. This unique site design virtually eliminates all congestion on the adjacent roadways and provides even and efficient flow to the site. The school will also commit to the construction of a left turn lane on Hiatt Drive at the easterly school entrance to further ensure unencumbered emergency access. The school will commit to a Condition of Approval requiring monitoring of the traffic operations which will provide an opportunity to implement mitigation measures as required in a coordinated effort with the City of Palm Beach Gardens and the tenants and owners within the PGA National Commerce Park. In summary, the site has been designed and the Operational Plan has been developed to ensure safe operations, reduced congestion and provide an unencumbered flow of emergency vehicles. Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 Page 16 ® Parents are required to attend a comprehensive orientation program prior to the commencement of the school year and sign a parent contract committing to comply with all operational and safety procedures with an emphasis on facilitating emergency access to the Chatsworth Assisted Living Facility (and all areas within the Commerce Park). ® At the comprehensive orientation program prior to the commencement of the school year, all parents are informed of the specific operational details related to drop -off and pick -up procedures and the state of the art FOB system. FOB's are assigned and distributed. ® Parents are required to have children prepared and ready for drop -off and pick -up to maximize efficiency and minimize drop -off and pick -up times. ® Parents are required to register and participate to the extent possible in carpooling and ride sharing programs. ® Parents are directed to watch for and yield to children /pedestrians and bicycles at the Hiatt Drive school crosswalk, at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive, and throughout the area. r • • The Renaissance Charter Schools have a proven track record of commitment to the community and the surrounding neighborhoods and businesses. The school is committed to be an active participant in the PGA National Commerce Park Association and to a monitoring program administered by the City of Palm Beach Gardens to implement mitigation measures that may be required to increase efficiency on the surrounding roadway network. The following summary of items has been presented as part of the overall Queuing /Accumulation Analysis and Operational Plan for the school: 1. The existing site has been completely redesigned to accommodate an unprecedented 100% of the required onsite queue /stacking at one time, providing for free flow from Hiatt Drive into the site, and virtually eliminating any potential for congestion on Hiatt Drive. 2. Trained staff and a state of the art FOB system will be utilized and a comprehensive Parental Education Program will be implemented to ensure the efficient flow of traffic throughout the school and the PGA National Commerce Park, as well as to maintain emergency access at all times. Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 Page 117 4. The establishment of a carpool /ride sharing registration program that maximizes carpooling opportunities and reduces overall traffic associated with the school. 5. Controlled delivery schedules at off -peak time periods, completely outside the peak drop -off and pick -up time periods. 6. The elimination of substantial tractor trailer traffic off of Hiatt Drive which was associated with the previously existing onsite distribution and warehouse center that will be discontinued with the development of the school. 7. The location of the school on Hiatt Drive at a signalized intersection with Northlake Boulevard to promote controlled ingress /egress. 8. Approved traffic impact study from the Palm Beach County Traffic Division (attached) verifying that capacity is available on the surrounding thoroughfare network and at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive to accommodate the proposed school. The school is committed to ensuring school operations flow efficiently and eliminate congestion on the adjacent Hiatt Drive and the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive as well as maintaining clear emergency access into the PGA National Commerce Park at all times. As required in the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards dated February 20, 2013, the school agrees to the following three Conditions of Approval: 1. The school must implement the following plan for staggered operations to elongate arrival and departure periods as proposed in the traffic study: ® Aftercare — Drop -off: 6:30 -7:30 AM, Pick -Up 3:30 -6:00 PM ® Grades K -4 — Drop -off: 8:30 -9:00 AM, Pick -Up 3:00 -3:30 PM ® Grades 5 -8 — Drop -off: 7:30 -8:00 AM, Pick -Up 2:30 -3:00 PM Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 Page 118 As stated throughout this report, monitoring and implementation of grows. The mitigations that may I school may include the following: the school is committed to the ongoing required mitigation measures as the school )e implemented following the opening of the 1. Coordinate with the Palm Beach County Traffic Division regarding the modification of the existing signal timing at Hiatt Drive and Northlake Boulevard. 2. Coordinate with the City of Palm Beach Gardens Engineer regarding the existing geometry of Hiatt Drive and the need for reconfiguration, i.e., reconfiguring the southbound lanes to provide for dual lefts. If required by the City Engineer, the school will commit to reconfiguring the southbound lanes (and associated signal modifications) to provide for dual left turn lanes prior to the first day of the second school year. 3. Coordinate with the City of Palm Beach Gardens Engineer regarding an eastbound left turn lane on Hiatt Drive at the easterly school ingress driveway. If required by the City Engineer, the school will commit to constructing the referenced left turn lane prior to the first day of the second school year. 4. Modify the 31 car drop- off /pick -up to accommodate more (or fewer) vehicles. 5. Providing a Palm Beach Gardens Police Officer, at school expense, during peak periods to direct school traffic flows to and from Northlake Boulevard to and from Hiatt Drive. In conclusion, the lower first year enrollment of 675 students will allow for monitoring of the school traffic operations. The "ramp up" enrollment will provide an opportunity to implement mitigation measures as required in a coordinated effort with the City of Palm Beach Gardens to ensure safe operations and eliminate congestion during the peak drop -off and pick -up time periods. sa: x: /docs /trafficdrainage /12096. operation alstudy. rev.word Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 � T ENGINEERING l PLANNING i CONSULTING I SINCE 1982 SIMMONS WHITE ENGINEERING l PLANNING i CONSULTING I SINCE 1982 SIMMONS WHITE i I 1 I 1 1 I CARS (TOTAL QUEUE) TWO (2) F.O.B. CARD READING PEDESTALS NOTE: CARS IN QUEUE OMITTED TO SHOW DIRECTIONAL ARROWS i 1 1� I o (TYP, ALL DIRECTIONAL I �] ARROWS) 4141 -- 4 -- — _ -- — _ - - -- - --- - - - - -- ' - -- _ C b a i I1 I I - - - - - -- �I I I i I I I I I i I I i RENAISSNANCE l CHARTER SCHOOL 61,317 S.F. ° 1,140 STUDENTS I I \ \ \ \ 5 CROSSWALK 31 CAR DROP -OFF I. \ A B C D E �o 0 2 '1 I I MATCH LINE THIS �HEET — ♦ - - - - - - - (1 " =50') 2 -LANES �I r - - - - - - - ONE -WAY DURING PEAK PERI u If ul a 11 - -- If II III — u u 111 — u I 11 'MK �I I 11 /Itr iU /Or 41010 rpotfi /1 /11 Ilnlli 11 0I0 t1 /It ip/It_ oloolop i 11 /I�l y1 /11 11/17 ?... 0 n I l 1 i H � A 1 ';I i I c • �o ti H, �j .i JI I II ' u d I ii 1 TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL CONES II II I TO CHANNELIZE EXISTING LANES & 1 111 \\ I II P I p I I PROHIBIT LEFT TURNS OUT \\ EXCLUSIVE LEFT TURN LANE fill a n ii EXISTING CROSSWALK EXTEND SIDEWALK &INSTALL I jl j j 1 II Q II I I WITH ASSOCIATED SIGNAL ,'� I u u p & PED SIGNAL CROSSWALK FOR CONTINUOUS �;\ ® ` .N MODIFICATIONS FOR — II o II WALKWAY FOR WALKERS & UAL LEFTS 1 1 1 BIKERS - - - -- - - - -- - -J .. a I I �I \� - - - -- STATE CERTIFIED a� s' SITE HIATT DR. RYDER CUP - BLVD. SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 42S., RANGE 42E, LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE PEDESTRIAN E�nAN ROUTE TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL CONES FOR Q TRAFFIC CONTROL DURING PEAK • DROP -OFF /PICK -UP TIMES ONLY TRAINED STAFF MEMBER FOR A FLOW CONTROL TEACHERS/TRAINED STAFF ASSISTING WITH STUDENT LOADING /UNLOADING ® PARENT CARS IN QUEUE (225 TOTAL) 1 E RInTOR MB- FR UP PROCEDU NOTE: NUMBER OF TRAINED ASSISTS WITH LOADING AND UNLOADING OF CHILDREN WILL VARY FOLLOWING OPENING OF SCHOOL AND ASSESSMENT OF NEEDS •2/3 ASSIST CHILDREN; CONTROL THE FLOW AND MERGING OF /^r THE EXITING 'PLATOON' OF 31 CARS FROM 3 LANES TO 2 LANES l OPERATIONAL II II I� it STATE CERTIFIED CROSSING GUARD ASSISTS CHILDREN X•4 CROSSING HIATT DR. 5 STATE CERTIFIED CROSSING GUARD ASSISTS CHILDREN CROSSING HIATT f DR. AT NORTHLAKE BLVD. l OPERATIONAL II II I� it Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 ENGINEERING I PLANNING I CONSULTING I SINCE 1982 SIMMONS WHITE M& •; 2t,- �ffl • • •� k• - '•' • MA:sf Engineering Division ec: Rob F. Rennebaum, PE. — Simmons & White Steve Bohovsky, Technical Assistant III, Traffic Division File: General — TPS - Mun. -Traffic Study Review F:\TRAFFIC\ma\Admin\Approvals\2012\121205.doe February 20, 2013 March 27, 2013 (Revised) Department of Engineering and Public Works P.O. Box 21229 Richard J. Marrero West Palm Beach, FL 33416 -1229 Senior Planner City of Palm Beach Gardens (561) 684 -4000 10500 N. Military Trail FAX: (561) 684 -4050 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 -2750 www.pbcgov.com RE: Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Project : 121205 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW Dear Richard: Palm Beach county The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has received and reviewed the revised traffic Board of county study (prepared by Simmons & White and dated 3/11/2013) and supplemental Commissioners documents for the proposed charter school entitled Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 12 of the Palm Beach Steven L. Abrams, Mayor County Land Development Code. The project is summarized as follows: Priscilla A. Taylor, Vice Mayor Location: North side of Hiatt Drive, north of Northlake Boulevard, west of the Hal R. valeche Florida Turnpike. Municipality: Palm Beach Gardens Paulette Burdick PCN #: 524242- 15 -38- 000 -0070. Shelley Vana Existing Uses: 26,000 SF General Office, and 61,317 SF Warehouse, Proposed Plan: 26,000 SF General Office, and 1,140 Students Charter School (k -8) Mary Lou Berger [Phase Is 675 students] Jess R. Santamaria New Daily Trips: 21631 New PH Trips: 1,011 AM and 199 PM, Build -out: End of Year 2017 Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the proposed charter county Administrator school meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County under the following conditions: Robert Weisman ® The School must implement the following plan for staggered operations to elongate arrival and departure periods as proposed in the Operational Management Plan (prepared by Simmons & White and dated 3/11/2013): o After Care — Drop -off: 6:30 -7:30 AM, Pick -Up: 3:30 -6:00 PM. o Grades k-4 — Drop -off: 8:30 -9:00 AM, Pick -Up: 3:00 -3:30 PM. o Grades 5 -8 — Drop -off: 7:30 -8:00 AM, Pick -Up: 2:30 -3:00 PM. ® No building permits are to be issued by the City for the proposed school after the build -out date specified above. ® The County traffic concurrency approval is subject to the Project Aggregation "An Equal Opportunity Rules set forth in the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. Affirmative Action Employer" printed on recycled paper The following is also strongly suggested to the City: • After start of school operations and at the enrollment thresholds described below, the school should be required to submit studies prepared by a professional traffic engineer monitoring driveway operations and traffic circulation at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard / Hiatt Drive: 1) 30 days after the first school year has commenced 2) 30 days after the school year has commenced during which student enrollment exceeds 90% of the proposed capacity of 1,140 students. • These studies should be conducted during the "peak hour of generator" periods and should be focused on identifying necessary measures (including but not limited to the 6 potential "mitigations" identified at the end of the "Conclusion" of the Operational Management Plan) to deal with any traffic circulation, control and safety related problems. The analysis should also be submitted to the County Traffic Division for review and comments. The County Traffic Division signal timing engineer should also be notified to make required signal timing changes at.the intersection of Northlake Boulevard with Hiatt Drive. Since these studies will occur after the school has already opened, the City may want to require some performance security be posted to implement the recommended mitigation measurets) when needed.. • In particular, the County Traffic Division has a potential safety concern which can be described as follows: Although westbound traffic volumes during the AM peak hour are well below the capacity of jtheree lanes available on Northlake Blvd, a safety problem may arise at the inction of Northlake Blvd /Hiatt Drive if the westbound right turn movement o ehicles begins backing up in the rightmost through lane of Northlake Blvd. The posted speed limit on Northlake Blvd is 55 MPH and some traffic moves even faster coming down from the Turnpike overpass. Through traffic travelling in the rightmost lane of Northlake Blvd will have to change lanes quickly or stop should a queue develop for the westbound right turn movement at the Hiatt Drive intersection, resulting in accident potential at this high speed. To reduce this accident potential, it is strongly recommended that the School be required to fund the installation of the advance warning sign with flasher on Northlake Blvd at the Turnpike overpass prior to opening. This flasher should be connected to and activated by a queue detection device on the east approach to the Hiatt Drive intersection. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684 -4030 or send me an e-mail to aennisQpbc oq v.or9. Sincerely Allan A. Ennis, P. ., AICP Assistant Director - Traffic Division MA:sf ec: Rob F. Rennebaum, PE. — Simmons & White Steve Bohovsky, Technical Assistant III, Traffic Division File: General — TPS - Mun. -Traffic Study Review F:\TRAFFICVna\Admin\Approvals\2012\121205R.doc 27* 67 ** 54 * ** 0 r elm 82* 205 ** 165 * ** LEGEND 18* ±20% - MORNING /AFTER CARE 103 ** ±40% - 7:30 -3:00 STAGGERED START /END TIME (INCLUDES OFFICE AREA) 98 * ** ±40% - 8:30 -3:30 STAGGERED START /END TIME 413 AADT NOTE: THE OFFICE AREA WILL UTILIZE THE CENTRAL DRIVEWAY ONLY 92* 185 ** 185 * ** 8** 1383 �lli11 FUSE ENROLLMENT - 1140 STUDENTS AM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT WORKSHEET 173-2-11 113* 225 ** 225 * ** L 1596 i ;•l 1lcr 12 -096 KID 11 -30 -12 REVISED 02 -07 -13 REVISED 02 -07 -13 LEGEND 84 w J ENGINEERING 1 PLANNING 1 CONSULTING 1 SINCE 1882 Authorization Ida. 3452 5601 Corporate Way o Suite 200 a West Palm Beach. Florida 33407 a (561) 478 -7848 PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT NOTE: THE OFFICE AREA WILL UTILIZE THE CENTRAL DRIVEWAY ONLY 115 FULL ENROLLMENT - 1140 STUDENTS PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT WORKSHEET M" 0 affil 0_ AT THE GARDENS 12-096 1 1 REVISED 02-07-13 N.T.S. 54* 110 ** 110 * ** 8 ** 819 321 945 LLJ HIATT (N N fie) OD 00 -,�wj L 49* 139 ** 98 * ** 16* 46** 32 * ** NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD k N d- d- ,J Q m PHASE ONE ENROLLMENT - 675 STUDENTS (APPROX.) AM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT WORKSHEET LEGEND 18* ±20% - MORNING /AFTER CARE 103 ** ±40% - 7:30 -3:00 STAGGERED START /END TIME (INCLUDES OFFICE AREA) 98 * ** ±40% - 8:30 -3:30 STAGGERED START /END TIME 413 AADT NOTE: THE OFFICE AREA WILL UTILIZE THE CENTRAL DRIVEWAY ONLY • LEGEND 84 w J ENGINEERING 1 PLANNING 1 CONSULTING I SINCE 1982 Authorization No. 3452 5601 Corporate Way a Suite 200 a West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 a (561) 478 -7848 I PM PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENT NOTE: THE OFFICE AREA WILL UTILIZE THE CENTRAL DRIVEWAY ONLY 68 58 - 6 3190NEW1101 TURNING MOVEMENT WORKSHEET Nlfxt , ` • 1 N.T.S. 1; 12 -096 KID 11 -30 -12 REVISED 02 -07 -13 Renaissance Charter School at the Gardens Job No. 12 -096 SIMMONS 3 PERIOD dz l/LV TO l z i3L /e PREPARED BY: m W SIM N FJ 2 FLORIDA TRAFFIC CRASH REPORT DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE LONG FORK! MAIL TO: DEPT. OF HIGHWAY SAFETY & MOTOR VEHICLES, TRAFFIC CRASH RECORDS, NEIL KIRKMAN BUILDING, TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-0537 DATE OF CRASH TIMEOFCRASH TIME OFFICER NOTIFIED TIME OFFICER ARRIVED INVEST. AGENCY REPORT NUMBER HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER c 0 0310212010 11:54 AM ❑ PM 11:54 AM ❑ PM 12:00 ❑ AM PM 10001129 80528201 1 J COUNTY /CiTYCODE FEET a MILE(S) N S E W CITY OR TOWN (Check 9 In City or Town) COUNTY CS 06/78 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ °f PALM BEACH GARDENS PALM BEACH Iz AT NODE NO. a FEET or WILE(S) FROM NODE NO. NEXT NODE NO. NO. OF LANES 1. OIylpEp ON STREET, ROAD OR HIGHWAY 2. UNDMDED CR809A NORTHLAKE BLVD AT THE INTERSECTION OF (street, road or highway) or FEET MILE(S) N S E W FROM INTERSECTION OF (street, road a highway) HIATTDR ❑❑ ❑❑ 9. Phantom YEAR MAKE TYPE USE VEH. LICENSE NUMBER STATE VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 3 4 6 6 1B. Undercarriage DRIVER 2. Hit & Run 3 2 7 19.Overhun ACTION 3, WA 03 HISS Ol 01 t�sP05 FL 3NiBC13E791460465 20. Windshield 9 16 96 17 8 21. TRAILER TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE HOW FIRST POINT INFORMATION 14 13 12 19 10 9 OF VEHICLE DAMAGE VEHICLE TRAVELING ON AT Est MPH Posted Speed EST. VEHICLE DAMAGE 1. Disabling EST. TRAILER DAMAGE AND CIRCLE N S Yt EX ar��NE ❑ ❑ Lam. ❑ CR809A N ®RTH KE BLV ® 30 ®0.00 3.N Damage 2 DAMAGED AREA(S) MOTOR VEHICLE INSURANCE COMPANY (LIABILITY OR PIP) POLICY NUMBER VEHICLE REMOVED BY: 1. Tow Rotation List 3. Driver HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INS. CO. SSPHK48584201540A LAKE PARK TOWING z. row ownersRegDest 4.ome 1 ❑ a > NAME OF VEHICLE OWNER (Check Box It Same As Driver) [X CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY AND STATE ZIP CODE SAME AS DRIVER NAME OF OWNER (Trailer or rowed Vehicle) CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY AND STATE ZIPCODE c roar' NAME OF MOTOR CARRIER (Commercial Vehicle Only) CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE US DOT or ICC MC IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS n- a NAME OF DRIVER (Taken From Driver License) / PEDESTRIAN CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY, STATE & ZIP CODE DATE OF BIRTH MILAGROS SABROSO 6505 EMERALD DUNES DR 201 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33411 03/05/1988 DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER STAT ALC/DRUG TEST TYPE RESULTS ALC @RUG PHYS.DE RES RACE SEX INJ. S.EQUIP EJECT TYP IFL END. 1 Blood 3 Urine 5 Nate 5162540885850 5 3 2Breath 4Refused 5 1 1 1 1 2 1 2151 1 PLACARDED ONPLACARD, P, IDIIADIIGITNUNIAFIRFOROMBOTTOxMOFD�IAMOnO. X 't'jItWffiRRATNEt' DRIVER'S PHONE NO. BEt IINNGTR�AIISORTTEEQS MAATERLAALSPILLED? IFEYe08"CQ ® ® I Ell ® ® (K;61 ) 317 °9827 1 Yes 214o 1 Yes 2 No 1 Yes 24 1 Yes 2 NO 2. Phantom YEAR MAKE TYPE USE VEH. LICENSE NUMBER STATE VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 6 19. Un�adxn�� DRIVER un 7 ACTION 3WA 10 F ®RD 01 01 N755MA FL 1FAHP3FN1AW122809 20. windshield W34 17 B TRAILER TYPE TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE SHOW FIRST POINT INFORMATIDN 9 OF VEHICLE 10 DAMAGE 13 VEHICLE TRAVELING ON AT Est MPH Posted Speed EST. VEHICLE DAMAGE 1. Disabling EST. TRAILER DAMAGE AND CIRCLE Fundorial EX ❑ ❑ ❑ IX CR809A NORTHLAKE BLV $3000,001 3. No Damage 1 DAMAGEDAREA(S) m M070R VEHICLEINSURANCE COMPANY (LIABILITY OR PIP) POLICY NUMBER VEHICLE REMOVED BY: 1. Tow Rotation Ust 3. Diver IDS PROPERTY CASUALTY BX05249224 LAKE PARK TOWING z. Tow Owner's Request 4. Other > NAME OF VEHICLE OWNER (Check Box If Same As Driver) [X CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY AND STATE ZIP CODE I� SAME AS DRIVER NAME OF OWNER (Trallera Towed Vehicle) CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITYANDSTATE ZIP CODE y NAME OF MOTOR CARRIER (Commercial Vehicle Only) CURRENT ADDRESS (Number end Street) CITY, STATE AND ZIP CODE US DOT or ICC W IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS v m Q NAME OF DRIVER (Taken From Diver License)/ PEDESTRIAN CURRENTADDRESS (Numberand Street) CITY, STATE &ZIP CODE DATE OF BIRTH ELEANOR B. ADAMS 700 LORI DR 10 209 PALM SPRINGS FL 33461 01/25/ 1944 DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER STAT 4 ALC/DRUGTESTTYPE RESULTS ALCIDRUG DEJ RES, RACE SEX INJ. S. EQUIP EJECT END. i Blood 3 Utne 5 None A352202445250 FL 5 3 2 Bream 4 Refused 1 1 1 1 2 2 2814 1 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS I BEINGTRAt1SPORTEO I PLACARDED I I IFYES INDICATE IINJE OR 4 DIGIT NUMBER FROM DIAMOND OR BOX ON PLACARD, AND I DIGIT NUMBER FROM BOTTOM OFDIAMOND. WASHAZARDOUS MATERIAL SP&LED2 RECOMMEND DRIVER RE-EXAM, DRIVER'S PHONE NO, IF YES EXPLAIN IN UkRIPATNE ® 1 Yes ® ❑ ® 1 ® 561 '434 ^464® 1 Yea 2 No 2!k 1 Yes 2 ik Yes 2 W VEHICLE TYPE VEHICLE USE TRAILER TYPE RESIDENCE (Driver I Ped.) PHYSICAL DEFECTS ALCOHOL /DRUG USE LOCATION Ot Automobile 01 Private Transportation 01 Single Semi Trailer 1 County of Crash i No Defects Known 9 Not Drinking or Using Drugs IN VEHICLE 02 Van 02 Commerdal Passengers 02 Tandem Semi Trailer 2 Elsewhere In State 2 Eyesight Defect 2 Alcohol -Under Influence 1 Front Left 03 Light Truck/ P.U.-2 or 4 rear tires 03 Commercial Cargo 03 Tank Trailer 3 Non- Restdent Out of State 3 Fatigue /Asleep 3 Drgs - Under Influence C 0 04 Medium Truck -4 rear tires 04 Public Transportation 04 Saddle Mount /Flamed . 4 Foreign 5 Unknown 4 Hearing Defect 4 Alcohol &Drugs - Under Influence 2 Front Center •m 05 Heavy Truck -2 or we rear axles 05 Public School Bus 05 Boat Trailer 5 "hoes 5 Had Been Drinking 3 Front Right DL TYPE RACE DO 06 Truck Tractor (Cab - Bobtail) OB Private School Bus 06 WRY Trailer 6 Seizure, Epilepsy, Blackout 6 Pending ALCIDRUG Test Results 4 Rea Left 1 A 2 8 3 C i While s_ 07 Motor HomoIRV) 07 Ambulance D7 House Trailer 4 D /ChauBeur 2 Bladk 7 Other Physical Defect 5 Rea Center .� 08 Bus (dinner +seats fag -15) 08 Law Enforcement 08 Pole Trailer 5 FJ Operator 3 Hispanic 6 Rea Right INJURY SEVERITY SAFETY EQUIPMENTINUSE 09 Bus drama +seats la over 15 ( ) 09 Flre /Rescue 09 Towed Vehicle 6 El Oper: ResL 4 Other 1 None 1 Not in use 7 In Body of Truck a) 10 Bicycle 10 "Story 10 Auto Transport 7 None 2 Possible 2 Seat Bald /Shoulder Harness 8 Bus Passenger 0 11 Motorcycle 11 Other Government 77 Omer 3 Non - Incapacitating 3 Child Restraint 9 Other REQUIRED SEX U 12 Moped 12 Dump ENDORSEMENTS 4 Incapacitating 4 AkBag - Deployed 1 Male 13 All Terrain Vehicle 13 Concrete Mixer 5 Fatal (Within 30 Days) 5 Air Bag - Not Deployed EJECTED 1 Yes 1 No 14 Train 14 Garbage or Refuse 2 No 2 Famald 6 Non - Traffic Fatality 6 Safety Helmet 15 Low Speed Vehicle 15 Cargo Van 3 No Endorsement 7 Eye Protection 2 Yes 77 Omer 77 Omer Required 3 Partial HSMV -84403 (REV. 002) Page-1--_ Of 4- S e C 0 PROPERTY DAMAGED -OTHER THAN VEHICLES EST, AMOUNT OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP 1 PROPERTY DAMAGED - OTHER THAN VEHICLES EST. AMOUNT OWNER'S NAME ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP 2 CONTRIBUTING CAUSES -DRIVER I PEDESTRIAN VEHICLE DEFECT VEHICLE MOVEMENT VEHICLE SPECIAL FUNCTIONS 01 No 02 Careless Improper © 02 DeLBr Brakes ® ® © 02 Slowing Sopped /Stalled ® ® 2 Farm ® ® Q 03 Failed To 'field Right rot -Way 0� FO 1] ❑ 03 Worn /Snwoth Tees Q� ®x ❑ D3 Making Left Turn Q3 ®� ❑ 3 Poke Pursuit ��❑ D4 Improper Backing 04 Defeclfi'e /Improper 04 Backing 4 Recreational 05 Improper Lane Change ❑�❑ L(ghts ❑❑❑ 05 Making Right Turn 11 Passing 5 Emergency Operation 06 Improper Tum 05 Puncbre /Blovnui 06 Changing Lanes 12 Driverless or 6 Construction /Maintenance 07 Alcohol - Underinluence 06 Steering Mach. 07 Entering /Leaving /Parking Space Runaway Vehicle SOURCE OF CARRIER INFORMATION 08 Drugs - Under Influence ❑ ❑❑ 07 Windshield Wipers D8 Property Parked 77 All Other (Explain 1 Not Applicable 09 Alcohol & Drugs - Under Influence 08 Equipment/ Vehicle 77 Atli Other 09 Improperly Parked In Narrative 2 Shipping Papers � 10 Followed Too Closely Defect (Explain In Narrative) 10 Making U-Twn 3 Vehicle Side 1 1 11 Disregarded Traffic Signal POINT 0 COLLISION 4 Driver 12 Exceeded Safe Speed Limit 19 Improper Load 01 On Road ® 5 Other 13 Disregarded Stop Sign 20 Disregarded Other Traffic Control 02 Not On Road ❑ ❑ ❑ PEDESTRIAN ACTION LOCATION TYPE 14 Failed To Maintain Equip. /Vehicle 21 Driving Wrong Side /Way 03 Shoulder Ql, Q�, 01 Crossing Not at Intersection 07 Working Q © © 1 Pdmwiy 15 Improper Passing 22 Fleeing Police 04 Medlars 02 Crossmg at Wd-block Crosswalk In Road Busine 16 Drove Left of Center 23 Vehicle Modified 05 Turn Lane qvp ymg ❑❑ ❑ l 03 Crossing at Intersection 08 Standin la � 2 Primarily i 17 Exceeded Stated Speed Limit 24 Driver Distraction (Explain O 04 Walking Along Road With Traffic In Road Residential 18 Obstructing Traffic in Narrative) 01 None ® ® © 05 Waling Along Road Against Traffic 09 Standing In Pedestrian Island 3 Open Country 77 All Other (Explain In Nanatve) 02 Nearby 06 Working on Vehicle In Road 77 All Other (Explain In Narrative) 03 Entered R R❑ 88 Unknown FIRST/ SUBSEQUENT HARMFUL EVENT(S) ROAD SYSTEM IDENTIFIER LIGHTING CONDITION 01 Collision WM MV in Transport (Rear End) 15 Collision With Arilmal 29 MV Ran Into Dkh/CUkerl o © © 01 interstate 07 Forest Road 01 Daylight 02 Collision With MV In Transport (Head On) 16 MV Hd Sign I Sign Post 30 Ran Off Road Into Water 02 U.S. 08 Private Roadway ®(,� 02 Dusk 03 Collision With MV in Transport (Angle) 17 MV Hit Utility Pole / Light Pole 31 Overturned 04 04 ❑ 03 State 77 At Other (Explain 03 Dawn Fo 11 04 Collision With MV in Transport (Left Turn) 18 MV Hit Guardrail 32 Occupant Fell From Vehicle 04 County In Narrative 04 Dark (Street Light) 05 Collision With MV In Transport (Right Turn) 19 MV Hit Fence 33 Tractor lTrailerJackknifed ❑❑❑ 05 Local 05 Dark (No Street Light) O6 Collision With MV In Transport (Sideswipe) 20 MV Hit Concrete Barrier Wall 34 Fire 06 Turnpike / Tell 88 Unknown 07 Collision With MV In Transport (Backed Into) 21 MV Hit Bridgefler/AbutmentlRail 35 Explosion —R-07T&URFACE CONDITION WEATHER ROAD SURFACE TYPE 08 Collision With Parked Car 22 MV Hit Tree / Shrubbery 36 Downhill Runaway ❑ ❑ ❑ 01 try 01 Clear 01 SlaVGraveVSfone O9 Collision With MV on Roadway 23 Collision With Construction Barricade Sign 37 Cargo Loss a Sh'df 02 Wet 02 Cloudy 02 Blacktop 10 Cofiswn With Pedestrian 24 Collision With Traffic Gato 38 Separation of Units 03 Slippery 0� 03 Rain ®� 03 Brick/Block 02 11 Collision With Blcyde 25 Collision With Crash Aftenuators 39 Median Crossover ❑ ❑ ❑ 04 Icy 04 Fog ❑ 04 Concrete 12 Golf slon With Bicycle (Bike Larne) 26 Collision With Fixed Object Above Road 77 All Other (Explain In 77 All Other 77 Ali Other 05 Dirt 13 Collision W(h Moped 27 MV Hit Other Fixed Objed Narrative) (Explain In Narrative) (Explain In 77 All Other (Explain In 14 Collision With Train 26 ColBSan With Moveable Object on Road Narrative) Narrative) ROAD CONDITIONS AT TIME OF CRASH VISION OBSTRUCTED TRAFFIC CONTROL SITE LOCATION TRAFFIGWAY CHARACTER 01 No Defects 01 Vision Not Obstructed 01 No Control 01 Not At Intersection I RR X -Ing l Bridge 01 Straight -Laval 02 Obstruction W%Waming 02 IndementWeatuer 02 Special Speed Zone 02 At Intersection 02 Straight - Upgrade) 03 ObstrucBnn WithoutWarnfng ®� 03 Parked / Stopped Vehicle QZ 03 Speed Control Sign ®5 03 Influenced By Intersection ®2 Downgrade ®� 04 Road Under Repair l Construction 04 Trees /Crops /Bushes 04 School Zone 04 Driveway Access 03 Curve - Leval 05 Loose Surface Materials 05 Load On Vehicle 05 Traffic Signal 1 t Posted No U-Turn 05 Railroad 11 Private Properly D4 Curve - Upgrade I D6 Shoulders- Soft /Low /High 06 Building l Fixed Object D6 Stop Sign 12 No Passing Zone 00 Bridge 12 Tell Booth Downgrade 07 Holes/ Ruts / Unsafe Paved Edge 07 Signs I Billboards 07 Yield Sign 77 All Other (Explain In 07 Entrance Ramp 13 Public Bus Stop Zone TYPE SHOULDER 08 Standing Water 08 Fog 08 Flashing Light Narrative) 08 EYA Ramp 77 All Other (Explain In 01 Paved D9 Worn I Polished Road Surface 09 Smoke 77 All Other pplain 09 Railroad Signal 09 Parking to Public Narrative) 02 Unpaved •S 77 All Other (Explain In Narrative) ❑ 10 Glare In Narrative) ❑ 1 10 Officer l Guard l Flagperson 10 Parking Lot- Private 03 Curb Agency Case 11110001129 HSMV Crash # 80528213 SECTION 4 NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER N SECTION 4 NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER i O � SECTION 4 NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER 0 J SECTION tt NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER Agency Case 11110001129 HSMV Crash # 80528213 FLORIDA TRAFFIC CRASH REPORT DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE NARRATIVE /DIAGRAM MAIL TO: DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY & MOTOR VEHICLES, TRAFFIC CRASH RECORDS SECTION, NEIL KIRKMAN BUILDING, TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399 -0500 71ME EMS NOTIFIED (FATALITIES ONLY) TIME EMS ARRIVED (FATALITIES ONLY) DATE OFCRASH COUNTY ICITYCODE INVEST, AGENCY REPORT NUMBER HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER ❑ AM[ PM ® AM E] PM 103/02/2 010 78 10001 805282 (NARRATIVE) Vl WAS EASTBOUND ON NORTHLAKE BLVD IN THE LEFT TURN LANE TO GO NORTH ON HIATT DR. V2 WAS WESTBOUND ON NORTHLAKE BLVD IN THE CENTER LANE APPROACHING THE V2 ENTERED THE INTERSECTION ON A GREEN SIGNAL AT WHICH TIME V1 INTERSECTION OF HIATT DR. ATTEMPTED TO MAKE THE LEFT TURN ON AN UNPROTECTED GREEN SIGNAL, Vl'S FRONT COLLIDED INTO V2'S LEFT SIDE, D1 STATED SHE SAW THE GREEN SIGNAL WHEN SHE MADE THE LEFT TURN BUT MUST OF MISREAD THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND STRUCK V2, D2 STATED SHE WAS WESTBOUND ON NORTHLAKE BLVD APPROACHING THE INTERSECTION OF HIATT DR. SHE SAW THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL TURN GREEN SO SHE PROCEEDED THROUGH THE INTERSECTION WHEN SHE WAS STRUCK BY V1, Dl IS CHARGED AT FAULT FOR VIOLATING THE RIGHT OF WAY WHILE MAKING A LEFT TURN AT AN INTERSECTION. Vl'S APPROXIMATE DAMAGE $3000. V2'S APPROXIMATE DAMAGE $3000. "END) * * SEC4 PASS PASSENGER'SNAME CURRENTADDRESS CITY &STATE ZIP CODE ALLISON ANDRATE DATE OF BIRTH RAC BE LOC INJ S, EQUIP. EJECT 2 1 1063 CARLTON WAY PALM BEACH GARDENS FL 33418 1/311200 1 2 3 1 3 4 1 SEC PASS7, PASSENGER'S NAME CURRENTADDRESS CITY &STATE ZIP CODE DATEOFBIRTH RACI SW LOC INJ S. EQUIP. EJECT SE04 PASSi PASSENGER'S NAME CURRENT ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE DATEOF BIRTH RAC SE LOG INJ S. EQUIP. EJECT SECi PAS PASSENGER'S NAME CURRENTADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE DATE OF BIRTH RAC SE LOC INJ S. EQUIP. EJECT SEC4 PASS PASSENGER'S NAME CURRENT ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE DATE OF BIRTH RAC SE LOC INJ S. EQUIP. EJECT SEC4 PAS PASSENGER'S NAME CURRENTADDRESS CITY & STATE ZJP CODE DATE OF BIRTH RAC SE LOC INJ S. EQUIP. EJECT N u 0 SECTION P NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER b SECTION NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER WITNESS NAME (1) CURRENT ADDRESS CITY& STATE ZIP CODE WITNESS NAME (2) CURRENT ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE FIRST AID GIVEN BY- NAME 1. Phyddm a Nurse 2. Paramedic or EMT 3. Police ORS INJURED TAKEN TO: BY - NAME PALM BCH COUNTY FR 4.CeMedlstAldu S.Ofhar [all REFUSED WAS IF NO, THEN WHERE? INVESTIGATION 1. YES ❑ MADEATSCENE? 2.NO 1 IS IF N0, THEN WHY? DATE OF REPORT INVESTIGATION 1 YES COMPLETE 2. NO 1 03/02/2010 PHOTOS IF YES, BY WHOM? TAKEN 1. YES ❑ 1. INVESTIGATING AGENCY ❑ 2.N0 2 2- 0THER O C Kevin Folmar 1 202 PALM BEACH GARDENS FHP SO PD OTHE POLICE DEPARTMENT ❑❑ FX ❑ HSMV -M5 (REV. 01/02) Page 3 Of 4 NORTHLAKE BLVD i i i NOT TO SCALE 40F4 I HIATT OR Vehicle 2 NOT TO SCALE 40F4 I HIATT OR TOTAL It OF VEHICLE I:: TOTAL # OF PERSON SECTION(S) 2 TOTAL " "" ' First Harmful Event Non - collision Collision Non -Fixed Object Collision with Fixed Object First Harmful Event i Overturn /Rollover 10 Pedestrian 19 Impact Attenuator /Crash 30 Concrete Traffic Barrier Location 10n Roadwa A 2 Fire /Explosion 11 Pedalcycle Cushion 31 Other Traffic Barrier Y 14 3 Immersion 12 Railway Vehicle (train, 20 Bridge Overhead Structure 32 Tree (standing) 2 Off Roadway 4 Jackknife engine) 21 Bridge Pier or Support 33 Utility Pole /Light Support 3 Shoulder 5 Cargo/Equipment 13 Animal 22 Bridge Rail 34 Traffic Sign Support 1, 4 Median First Harmful Event Loss or Shift 14 Motor Vehicle in Transport 23 Culvert 35 Traffic Signal Support 6 Gore within Interchange 6 Fell /Jumped From 15 Parked Motor Vehicle 24 Curb 36 Other Post, Pale or Support 75eparator Motor Vehicle 16 Work Zone /Maintenance 25 Ditch 37 Fence 8 In Parking Lane or Zone 1 No 7 Thrown or Falling Equipment 26 Embankment 38 Mailbox 9 Outside Right -of -way g 2 Yes Object 17 Struck by Failling, Shifting 27 Guardrail Face 39 Other Fixed Object (wall, 10 Roadside y 88 Unknown 8 Ran Into Water /Canal Cargo 28 Guardrail End building, tunnel, etc.) 88 Unknown 9 Other Non - Collision 18 Other Non -Fixed Object 29 Cable Barrier First Harmful Event Relation to Contributing Circumstances: Road Contributing Circumstances: Junction 9 Worn, Travel - Polished Surface Environment 10 Road Surface Condition (wet, �2] 5 Railway Grade Crossing icy, snow, slush etc,) 14 Entrance /Exit Ram n Si Obstruction in Roadway 15 Crossover- Related 12 Debris 1 Non - Junction 16 Shared -Use Path or Trail 1 None 13 Traffic Control Device 2 Intersection 17 Acceleration /Deceleration Lane 4 Work Zone (construction/ [no perative�Missing or Obscured 1 None 5 Animai(s� In Roadway 3 Intersection - Related 18 Through Roadway maintenance /utility) 14 NNon -Hig way Work 2 Weather Conditions 77 Other, xpiain in 4 Driveway /Alley Access 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 6 Shoulders (none, low, soft, high) 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 3 Physical Obstructions) Narrative Related 88 Unknown 7 Rut, Holes, Bumps 88 Unknown 4 Glare 88 Unknown Work Zone Related Crash in Work Zone Type of Work Zone Workers in Work Zone Law Enforcement in 1 No 1 Before the First Work Zone 1 Lane Closure 1 No Work Zone 2 Yes Warning Sign 2 Lane Shift /Crossover 2 Yes 1 No 88 Unknown ❑ 2 Advance Warning Area ❑ 3 Work on Shoulder or Median ❑ 88 Unknown ❑ 2 Officer Present 3 Transition Area 4 Intermittent or Moving Wor 3 Law Enforcement Vehicle 4 Activity Area 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Only Present 5 Termination Area HSMV 90010 S (E) (rev 10/10) Page 1 of � REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER ' 11�005104 81844036 1 Vehicle in Transport VEHICLE LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRE Check if Permanenj VIN 2 Parked Motor Vehicl Registratio Vehicle 212TLQ FL 5/ 04/2612 AF 4A28 54 136® 3 Working Hit and Run 1 No I YEAR MAKE - MODEL STYLE COLOR DAMAGE: 1 Disabling 4 Minor EST. AMOUNT 2 Yes 2 1i UC RIPE 4 I 2 Functional 88 Unknown 151000 88 Unknown 3 None INSURANCE COMPANY INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER - Towed due to Damage: ❑ VEHICLE REMOVED BY OFFS TOWING 1 Rotation 2 Owner Request STATE FA MUTUAL 9152745594 1 No 2Yes 3 Driver 4 Other Ex lain in Nam NAME OF VEHICLE OWNER (Check if Business)❑ CURRENTADDRESS CITY &STATE ZIP CODE SABRINA,® GAVAGNI FIORENTINO 80128 MURANO CIRCLE PALM EACH 33418 TRAILER A LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check if Permanen VIN - . YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES Registratior� TRAILER h LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check if Permanen VIN YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES Registration[] VEHICLE N S E W Off -Road Unknown ON STREET, ROAD, HIGHWAY AT £ST. SPEE POSTED SPEED TOTAL LANES TRAVELING❑ ❑ ❑ F-1 ❑ NRTH FCE L�/ 1 55 HAZ. MAT, RELEASED 1 No HAZ. MAT. PLACARD 1 No HAZ. MAT. NUMBER HAZ. MAT. CLASS Area of Initial Impact Most Dam rea 2Yes r 3 4 S a 2Yes 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 2 Y1 1 is in 19 Overturn 19 t 96 ,® M10 18 Undercarriage IS MOTOR CARRIER NAME US DOT NUMBER 70 Windshield 20 14 19 12 21 Tr�ilcr � 21 14 ,$ 12 9 MOTOR CA RRIER ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER Vehicle Body Type Trafficway Commercial Motor Vehicle Configuration 15 Low Speed Vehicle 1 Two -Way, Not Divided 1 Vehicle 10,000 Ibs or less Placarded 8 Tractor/Triple 16 (Sport) Utility Vehicle 2Two -Way, Not Divided, with a ❑ for Hazardous Materials 9 Truck more than 10,000 Has (4,53 117 17 Cargo Van (10 000lbs ❑ 2 Single -Unit Truck (2 -axle and GVWR Continuous Left Turn Lane kg) Cannot Classify (4,536 or lessf more than 10,000 Ibs (4,536 kg) Bus gJ 3 Two -Way, Divided, Unprotected SO /Large Van (seats for 9 -15 1 Passenger Car 18 Motor Coach (painted >4 feet) Median 3 Single -Unit Truck (3 or more axles) occupants, Including driver) 2 Passenger Van 19 Other Ught Trucks (10,000lbs 4 Two-Way, Divided, Positive Medlar 4Truck Pulling Traller(s 11 Bus (seats for more than 15 3 Pickup (4,536 kg} or Tess) Barrier 5T Tractor {bobtail occupants, including driver) 7 Motor Home 0 Medium /Heavy Trucks (more the 1 5 One -Way Trafficway 6 Truck Tractor /Semi- Traller 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 8 Bus 10,000 Ibs (4,536 kg) 88 Unknown Trailer T e 7 Truck Tractor /Double Trailer 88 Unknown 11 Motorcycle 21 Farm Labor Vehicle 12 Moped 77 Other, Explain in Narrative TRAILER 1 TRAILER 2 1 Single Semi Trailer g Pole Trailer Cargo Body Type 13 All Terrain Vehicle (ATV) 88 Unknown 2 Tandem Semi Trailer 9 Towed Vehicle 3 Van /Enclosed Box, 13 Container ha ( 3 Tank Trailer Container Chassis Comm /Non- Commercial 4 Saddle Mount/Trailer 11 utoTransport 4Hoppper 14 VehicleTowin g 77 Other, Explain i SPole- Trailer p 5 Boat Trailer Another Vehicle 1 Interstate Carrier 6 Utility railer Narrative 1 No Caro 6 Cargo Tank 15 Not A licable 2lntrastate Carrier y 88 Unknown g 7 Flatbed ( pp So DOD 3 Not in Commerce /Government 7 House Trailer 2 Bus 8 Dump Svehicle less not 5 kg) s n 4 Not in Commerce /Other Truck 9 Concrete Mixer displaying N Most Harmful Event Non•COlifsion Comm 210,0026,000 Ib.s b 536 - 11,793 kg) 30 Auto Transport 7 h, Explainain arrbage /Refuse ❑ 1 Overturn /Rollover GVWR/GCWR Narrative 3 More than 26,000 bs (11,793 kg) 11 L 2 Fire /Explosion 4 Not Applicable 88 Unknown 3 Immersion Collision with Non•flzed Object Collision with Non-Fixed Object 29 Cable Barrier Emergency i�r 4Jackknife g y SO Pedestrian 5 Carggo /Equipment Loss or Shift 11 Pedes ian 19 Impact Attenuator /Crash Cushion 30 Concrete Traffic Barrier Vehicle Use y 20 Bridge Overhead Structure 31 Other Traffic Barrier 6 Fell /Jum Jumped From Motor Vehicle P 12 Railway Vehicle (train, engine) 21 Bridge Pier or Support 32 Tree (standing) Sequence of 2nddnts 8 13 Animal 22 Bridge Rail 33 Utility Pole /Light Support Ran into Water/ naaject Ist CC II 14 Motor Vehicle in Transport 23 Culvert 34 Traffic Si n Su oK �• 90therNon- Collision g PPP 1 15 Parked Motor Vehicle 24 Curb 35 Traffic Signal5upport ne /Maintenance Post, Pole, Suppo F241 [44] or 40Equipment Failu Equipment 26 Embankment 2 Yes 37 FFence 4th brake failure, etc.) 17 Struck by Failing, Shifting Cargo or 27 Guardrail Face 38 Mailbox 88 Unknown T(blown 3rd 41 Separation d UnAnything Set in Motion by Motor 28 Guardrail End 39 Other Fixed Object (wail, 42 Ran Off RoadwaVehicle building, tunnel, e[c.) 43 Ran Off Roadwa 18 Other Non -Fixed Object ❑ ❑ 44 Cross Median 45 Cross Centerline Vehicle Maneuver Action Traffic Control Device For Vehicle Defects 46 Downhill Runaw1 Straight Ahead 13 Stopped in Traffic This Vehicle Left Roadway Grade ❑ 4 Bac ing is Negotiating ❑ i 1 Level Roadway Alignment 4 Backing 15 Negotiating a Curve 5 8 Flashing Signal y 57urning Right 2 Hillcrest 16 Leaving Traffic Lane 9 Railway Crossing 12 Suspension 3 uphill 1 Straight 6 Changing Lanes 17 Entering Traffic Lan Device p g 8 Parked 1 None 13 Wheels Fil 4 Downhill 2 Curve Aigh4 77 Other, Explain in 1 No Controls 10 Person (including 2 Brakes 14 Windows/ 5 Sag (bott om 3 Curve Left 10 Making U -Turn Narrative 4 School Zone Sign/ Flagman, Officer, 3 Tires Windshield 11 Overtaking/ 88 Unknown Device Guard, etc.) 4 Lights (head, 15 Mirrors Passing 5 Traffic Control 13 Warning Sign signal, tail) 16 Truck Coupling/ 1 No Special Function 9 Ambulance 14 Intercity Bus Signal 77 Other, Explain in Anal, Special Function Trailer Hitch% Narrative of Motor Vehicle 2 Farm Vehicle 10 Fire Truck IS Charter/Tour Bus 6 to� Sign 7 Wipers Safety Chains 3 Police 11 Farm Labor Transport 16 Shuttle Bus 88 Unknown 7 Yield Sign 9 Exhaust System 77 Other, Explain i 7 Taxi 12 School Bus 17 Farm Labor Bus 10 Body, Doors Narrative 8 Military 13 Transit /Commuter Bus 88 Unknown I 1 11 Power Train 88 Unknown PERSON# NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON# NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON# NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER HSMV 90010 S (V/P) (rev 10110) Page 2 of 9 REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER 11w005104 43 7Working n TransportJj�� VEHICLE LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRE Check if Permanen VIN - Vehilehicll � Vehicle L827 L 12/31/2011 Registratio 1 62K 4UB6 872 —J n ❑ YEAR MAKE MODEL STYLE COLOR D AMAGE: 1 Disabling 4 Minor E Yes 1: 2 2004 F EXPL RE SUV R 2 Functional 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 3 None INSURANCE COMPANY - INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER Towed due to Damage: ❑ VEHICLE REMOVED BY UFFS TOWING 1 Rotation 2 Owner Request ' STATE F MUTUAL 4579451594 1 No 2 Yes the 4 Other Explain in Narra NAME OF VEHICLE OWNER (Check If Business)❑ CURRENTADDRESS - - - CITY & STATE - ZIP CODE -. SAMUEL ORTIZ 14573 TEMPLE LV LOXAHATCHEEf FL 3347 TRAILERA LICENSE NUMBER STATE - REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check If Permanen VIN YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES RegistratiorE1 TRAILERII LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check if Permanen VIN - YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES Registration[] uON VEHICLE N 5 E W Off -Road Unknown STREET, ROAD, HIGHWAY AT EST. SPEE POSTED SPEED TOTAL LANES TRAVELING❑ ❑ ❑ F—] ❑ NORTH LAKE BLVD S 55 HAZ. MAT. RELEASED 1 No HAZ. MAT. PLACARD 1 No HAZ. MAT. NUMBER HAZ. MAT. CLASS Area of Initial Impact I - Most Damaged Area 2 Yes 88 Unknown 2 Yes 88 Unknown ❑ ° , W46 18 Undercania8e 18 2 S 4 a 7 19 Overturn 19 i7 t$ MOTOR CARRIER NAME US DOT NUMBER T 20 Windshield 2 21 Tree 1 9 9S 12 99 14 g MOTOR CARRIER ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER Vehicle Body Type Trafficway Commercial Motor Vehicle Configuration 15 Low Speed Vehicle 1 Two -Way, Not Divided 1 Vehicle 10,000 lbs or less Placarded 8 Tractor/Triple 16 tSport ) Utility Vehicle 2 Two -Way, Not Divided, with a for Hazardous Materials 9 Truck more than 10,000 Its (4,53 17 Cargo Van (10 0001bs Continuous Left Turn Lane ❑ 2 Single -Unit Truck (2 -axle and GVWR kg), Cannot Classify F1 6] (4,536 kg) or less more than 10,000 Ibs (4,536 kg) 3 Two -Way, Divided, Unprotected 10 Bus /Large Van (seats for 9 -15 1 Passenger Car 18 Motor Coach (painted >4 feet) Median 3 Single -Unit Truck (3 or more axles) cccupants, Including driver) 19 Other Light Trucks (10,000 Ibs 4 Two -Wa 4 Truck Pullin ( 11 Bus (seats for more than 15 2 Passenger Van y, Divided, Positive Media g Trailer s) (4,536 kg) or less) Barrier 5 Truck Tractor bobtad occupants, Including driver 3 Pickup P g ) 7 Motor Home 20 Medium /Heavy Trucks (more tha 5 One -Way Trafficway 6 Truck Tractor Semi - Trailer 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 8 Bus 10,000 Ibs (4,536 g)) 88 Unknown Trailer T e 7Truck Tractor /Double Trailer 88 Unknown 11 Motorcycle 21 Farm Labor Vehicle 77 Other, Explain In Narrative TRAILER 1 TRAILER 2 1 Single Semi Trailer Cargo Body Type 8 Pole Trailer g y 12 Moped gg Unknown 2 Tandem Semi Trailer 13 Intermodal 13 All Terrain Vehicle (ATV) 3 Tank Trailer 9 Towed Vehicle 3 Van /Enclosed Box Container Chassis 10 Auto Trans ort 4 Hopper 4 Saddle Mount/Trailer p p 14 Vehicle Towing Comm/Non-Commercial 1:1 77 Other, Explain 1 5 Pole - Trailer Another Vehicle 1 Interstate Carrier Narrative 6 Cargo Tank 5eolityTr it 15NotA Applicable 2 Intrastate Carrier 6 Utility Trailer 1 No Caro Flatbed 88 Unknown Cargo (vehicle 100 001bs 3 Not in Commerce /Government 7 House Trailer 2 Bus 8 Dump ( 4 Not in Commerce /Other Truck (( 9 Concrete Mixer 4,536 kg) or less not placard Comm 2 10 Auto Transport 7displaying tr, Expli Most Harmful Event Non - Collision 10000L26,d00Ibs (84,536- 11,793 kg) GVWR/GCWR ❑ 3 More than 26,0001bs (11,793 kg) Garbage /Refuse Narrative 1 Overturn /Rollover 112 2 Fire /Explosion 4 Not Applicable g 88 Unknown Emergency 44] 3Immersion Collision with Non -Fixed Object Collision with Non -Fixed Object 29 Cable Barrier Emer enc 5 Cawo Eq 10 Pedestrian 19 Impact Attenuator /Crash Cushion 30 Concrete Traffic Barrier 5 Loss or Shift 11 Pedalcycle Vehicle Use Fell Jumped 20 Bridge Overhead Structure 31 Other Traffic Barrier 6 Fell /Jumped From Motor Vehicle 12 Railway Vehicle (train, engine) 21 Bridge Pier or Support 32 Tree (standing) Sequence of Events 7Thrown or Fallingg Object 13 Animal 22 Bridge Rail 33 Utili Pole Lg)ht Support 1st 2nd 8 Ran into Water/ anal 14 Motor Vehicle in Transport Su 23 Culvert 34 Traffic Sign ort 9 Other Non- Collision g pP 1 15 Parked Motor Vehicle 24 Curb 35 Traffit 5 "sgnai Support 14OL46Sequence of Events on//yy 16 Work Zone /Maintenance 25 Ditch 36 Other Post, Pole, Suppo or 1 No 33 Equipment Failure Equipment 40 (blown tfr 26 Embankment 37 Fence 2 Yes brake failure, 17 Struck by Falling, Shifting Largo etc.) or 27 Guardrail Face 38 Mailbox 3rd 4th 42 of Units Anything Set in Motion by Motor 28 Guardrail End 39 Other Fixed Object (wall, 88 Unknown Ran Off 42 Ran Off Roadway, Rig Vehicle building, tunnel, etc.) 43 Ran Off Roadway, Left 18 Other Non -Fixed Object El 1-1 44 Cross Median 45 Cross Centerline Vehicle Maneuver Action Traffic Control Device For Vehicle Defects 46 Downhill Runawa 1 Straight Ahead 13 Stopped in Traffic This Vehicle Roadway Grade 3 Turning Left 14 Slowing �y 1 Level Roadway Alignment 4 Backing 15 Negotiating a Curve 8 Flashing Signal 1 5 Turning Right Leaving Y g 12 Suspension 2 Uphill 6 Changing Lanes 16 Entes Traffic Lane 9 vice Crossing P 3 Uphill 1 Straight Entering Traffic Lan Device 8 Parked 1 None 13 Wheels 77 4 Downhill 2 Curve Right 77 Other, Explain in 1 No Controls SO Person (including 2 Brakes 14 Windows/ 1D Making U -Turn ❑ 5 Sag (bottom 3 Curve Left Narrative 4 School Zone Sign/ Flagman, Officer, 3 Tires Windshield 11 Overtaking/ 88 Unknown Device Guard, etc.) 4 Lights (head, 15 Mirrors Pas sin 5 Traffic Control 13 Warning Sign signal, tail) 16 Truck Coupling/ Function 1 No Special Function 9 Ambulance 14 Intercity Bus 5ignai 77 Other, Explain in Special 6 Steering Trailer Hitch/ 2 Farm Vehicle 10 Fire Truck 15 Bus 6 Stop Sign Narrative 7 Wipers Safety Chains of Motor Vehicle Shuttle Bus 3 Police 11 Farm Labor Transport 16 Shuttle Bus 7 Yleld Sign 88 Unknown 9 Exhaust System 77 Other, Explain i 7 Taxi 12 School Bus 17 Farm Labor Bus SO Body, Doors Narrative 8 Military 13 Transit /Commuter Bus 88 Unknown 11 Power Train 88 Unknown PERSON# NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON# NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON # NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER HSMV 90010 S (VIP) (rev 10/10) Page3 of REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER . , 1 11-005104 17N.on iver VEHICLE it NAME PHONE NUMBER Check if - Motoris t ❑ -. Recommend ssenger 1 I i 1 (561) 836 °3$66 Driver Re- exam 64 CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) -- CITY & STATE ZIP. CODE 8028 MURANO CIRCLE PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33418 DATE OFBIRTH SEX: DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER STATE EXPIRES INJURY SEVERITY (INJ) 1 Male 1 None 4 Incapacitating ® 01/05/1992 2 Female 88 Unknown 12579 ®92505® FL 01/05/2014 Z Possible 5 Fatal iwithin 30 days) 3 Non - incapacitating 6 Non- rafflc Fatality DL Type Required Endorsements Drivers Actions at Time of Crash 1A 2B 3C 1st 26 Ran off Roadway 3rd Condition At 4 D /Chauffeur 2 No 1 No Contributing Action 27 Disregarded other Traffic Time of Crash 5 E /Operator 2 Operated MV in Careless or Sign 3 No Req. Endorsement ❑ Negligent Manner ❑ 6 E O Per - Rest i Apparently Normal / P 3 Failed to Yield Right-of-way 28 Disregarded Other Road slee or F 7 None g Y Markings 3 Asleep or Fatigued 4 Improper Backing 29 Over - Correcting /Over- 5 111 (sick) or Fatigued Driver Distracted By 4 Other Inside the Vehicle 6 Improper Turn Steering 6 Seizure, Epilepsy, Blackout (Explain in Narrative 2nd 10 Followed too Closely 4th 7 Physically Impaired P ) 30 Swerved or Avoided: Due Y Y P 1 Not Distracted 2 Electronic Communication ( External Distraction F_] 11 Ran Red Light to Wind, Slippery Surface, M� 8 Emotional (depression, Devices cell hone, etc.) outside the vehicle, expiai 12 Drove too Fast for Conditions Object, Non - Motorist In angry disturbed, etc.) ( P in narrative) 13 Ran Stop Sign 9 Under the influence of 3 Other Electronic Device Roadway, etc, e navi tion device, DVD player) 6 Texting 1S improper Passing 31 Operated MV in Erratic, Medications /Drugs /Alcohol ( P y ) 7 Inattentive 17 Exceeded Posted Speed Reckless or Aggressive Manner 77 Other, Explain In Narrative Driver Vison Obstructions 86 Unknown 21 Wrong Side of Wrong Way 77 Other Contributing Factor 88 Unknown Fil1 Vision Not Obscured 5 Load on Vehicle 9 Smoke 25 Failed to Keep in Proper Lane 2 Inclement Wepeather 6 Building Fixed Object 10 Glare r • &01; /Crops Bushes Vehicle 8 Fog s /Billboards i 7NarOtheer, Explain Helmet Use (HU) Eye Protection (EP) 4 Trees/Crops s Restraint Systems 1 DOT - Compliant 1 Yes ®' • ' ' ' Motorcycle Helme 2 No (RS) Motor Vehicle Seating Position: 2 Other Helmet 3 Not Applicabl LOCATION: SEAT ROW OTHER 3 No Helmet 1 Not Applicable Seat Row Other (LOC) ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 None Used - Motor Vehicle Occupant 1 1 Alr Bag Deployed 5 Deplo ed -Other 3 Shoulder and Lap Belt Used 1 Left 1 Front 1 NotApplicabl y 4 Shoulder Belt Only Used ABD (knee, air belt, etc ( ) - 2 Middle 2 Second 2 Sleeper Section of Truck Ca Ejection (EJECT) 6 Deployed- 5 Lap Belt Only Used 3 Right 3 Third 3 Other Enclose Cargo Area 1 Not Applicable Combination 6 Restraint Used - Type Unknown 77 Other 4 Fourth 4 Unenclosed Cargo Area 1 Not Ejected ❑ 7 Child Restraint System - Forward Facin 2 Not Deplo ed 7 Deployed- Curtai (explain in 77 Other Row 5 Trailing Unit 2 Ejected - Total 8 Child Restraint System -Rear Facing 3 Deployed- root 08 Deployment narrative) 88 Unknown Riding Motor Vehicle Exterior (non- 1 3 Elected - Partia I 9 Booster Seat q Deployed -Side Unknown t unit) 88 Unknown trailing unit) 4 otAppiicable 10 Child Restraint -Type Unknown 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Non - Motorist Description Non- Motorist Location At Time of Crash Action Prior to Crash 1 Pedestrian i Intersection -Marked Crosswalk 851dewalk 2 Other Pedestrian (wheelchair, person to a 2 Intersection - Unmarked Crosswalk 9 Median /Crossing Island 5 Walking /Cycling on Sidewalk building skater, pedestrian conveyance, etc. 3Intersection - Other 10 Driveway Access 61n Roadway - -Other (working 3 Bicyclist ❑ 4 Midblock - Marked Crosswalk 11 Shared -Use Path or Trail pplaying, etc.) 7 Adjacent to Roadway 4 Other Cyclist 5 Travel Lane - Other Location 12 Non-Trafficway Area 1 Crossing Roadway (e.g., 5 Occupant Motor Vehicle Not in Transpo 6 Bicycle Lane 77 Other, Explain in Narrativ 2 Waiting to Cross shoulder, median) of Roadway Going to or from School (K -1 ) (parked, etc.) 7 Shoulder Roadside 88 Unknown 3 Walkin Cyclin Along / 9 Working in Trafficway with 6 Occupant of a Non -Motor Vehicle Roadway Traffic (in or Transportation Device Non- Motorist Actions /Circumstances adjacent to travel lane) (incident response) 7 Unknown Type of Non - Motorist 1 No Improper Action 4 Walking /Cycling Along 10 None 2 Dart /Dash Roadway Against Traffic (in or 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Safety Equipment list 3 Failure to Yield Right -of -Way adjacent to travel lane) 88 Unknown 1 None 5 Lighting 4 Failure to Obey Traffic Signs, 2 Helmet 6 Not Applicable Signals, or Officer 7 Entering /Exiting Parked /Standing 10 Improper Turn /Merge 3 Protective Pads Used 77 Other{ Explai 5 in Roadway Improperly (standing, Vehicle 11 Improper Passing (elbows, knees, shins, etc.) in Narrative 2nd lying, working, playing) 8 Inattentive (talkln�, eating, etc.) 12 Wrong -Way Rlding or Walking Al Reflective Clothing (jacket, 88 Unknown 6 Disabled Vehicle Related (working 9 Not Visible ((dark c othing, no 77 Other, Explain in Narrative backpack, etc.) on, pushing, leaving /approaching) lighting, etc.) 88 Unknown • + +• SUSPECTED ALCOHOLTESTED: ALCOHOLT EST TYPE ALCOHOL BAC SUSPECTED DRUGTESTED: DRUG TEST TYPE: DRUGTESTRESULTt USE: I Blood TEST RESULT DRUG ALCOHOL 1 No USE: 88 est 2 Pending 1 No Refused ed n� ❑ ❑ 3 Test GSove 3 Urine Completed 2 Yes 3 Test Gvn 77 Other, 3 Pending 88 Unknown 88 Unknown, If Tested 77 Other, Explain in 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 88 Unknown, If Teste Explain in Narrativ 88 Unknown Narrative SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILIT� EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO i Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 2 PALM BCH GDNS FR 6762 ST MARY• S HOSPITAL /TRAUMA CTR 77 Other, Explain In Narrative 88 Unknown ADDITIONA OA�SENGERS PERSON VEHICLE" I NAME I I DATE OF BIRTH INJ SEX LOC:S R 0 EJE HU EP ABD RS 3 1 BRYANNA N. SANVILLE 108/29/X592 1512 3 1 1 1 3 4 2 I CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) : . CITY &STATE - ;ZIP CODE .10170 AVE PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL ; 33410 SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILITil EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown PERSON VEHICLE IrNAME - DATE OF BIRTH -- fNJ SEX LOC S R 0 EIE ABD RS I 2 BA IA SILVA 04/25/200 4 I 1 3 1 1 7HUFp 3 3 CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE' ZIP CODE 416 WINTER LN PALM BEACH A E S 33410 SOURCE OFTRANSPORTTO MEDICAL FACILIT EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTEDTO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown PALM BCH GDNS FR 6762 ST MARY•S HOSPITAL/TRAUMA CTR HSMV 90010 S (V /P) (rev 10/10) Page 4 of 9 REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER - HSMV CRASH REPORT.NLIMBER. PERSON 11® 005104 1 1 Driver VEHICLE # NAME PHONE NUMBER C heck if 2 Non - Motorist ® Recommend 3 Passenger J. VALENCIA (561) 255 -6865 Driver Re- exam[] CURRENTADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE ZIPCODE WINTER S ®F 3341 DATE OF BIRTH - SEX. DRIVER LiCENSE NUMBER - STATE': EXPIRES INJURY SEVERITY (INJ) 1 Male ® 1 None 4 lncal tating 01/22/1969 2 Female 11452 7Of:922 FL 01/22/2019 2 Possible 5 Fatal (within 30 days) ❑ 88 Unknown 3 Non - incapacitating 6 Non - Traffic Fatality DL Type Required Endorsements Drivers Actions at Time of Crash 1A 213 3C 1 Yes 1st 26 Ran off Roadway 3rd Condition At 1 No Contributing Action 4 D /Chauffeur 2 No 2 O1 perated MV in Careless or 27 Disregarded other Traffic ❑ Time of Crash Sin S E /Operator 3 No Re Endorsement Negligent q- Manner gDisre 2 3 Apparently Normal 6 E /Oper -Rest 8 g Disregarded Other Road 7 one 3 Failed to Yield Right -of -Way Markings 3 Asleep or Failgued 4 Improper Backing 29 Over - Correcting /Over- 5 111 (sick) or Fatigued Driver Distracted By 4 Other Inside the Vehicle 6 Improper Turn Steering 6 Seizure, Epilepsy, Blackout Explain in Narrative) 2nd 10 Followed too Closely 30 Swerved or Avoided: Due 4th 7 Physically Impaired 1 Not Distracted SS External Distraction 11 Ran Red Light 8 Emotional ((depression, 2 Electronic Communication 0 Wind Slippery5urface, M� 6 d (outside the vehicle, explai 12 Drove too Fast for Conditions Object, Non- Mottonst in angryd distur a hone, 1 Devices cell etc. ,etc.) ( P ) in narrative) 13 Ran Stop Sign 9 n er the influence of 3 Other Electronic Device Roadway, etc. (navigation device, DVD player) 6 Texting 15 Improper Passing 31 Operated MV in Erratic, Medications /Drugs /Alcohol 7lnattentive 17 Exceeded Posted Speed Reckless or Aggressive Manner 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Driver Vison Obstructions 88 Unknown 21 Wrong Side of Wrong Way 77 Other Contributing Factor 88 Unknown i Vision Not Obscured 5 Load on Vehicle 9 Smoke 25 Failed to Keep in Proper Lane 2 Inclement Weather 6 Bulldini /Fixed Object 10 Glare Trees/CropsyBushes =e7m 3 Parked /Stoppped Vehicle 7 Signs /Bi lboards 77 All Other, ExplEye Protection (EP) 4 8 Fog in Narrative Restraint Systems S Yes (RS) 2 No Motor Vehicle Seating Position: 2 Other Helmet ❑ 3 Not Applicabl LOCATION: SEAT ROW OTHER 3 No Helmet 1 Not Ap licable Seat Row Other (LOC) 2 None sed - Motor Vehicle Occupant ® Air Bag Deployed 3 Shoulder and Lap Belt Used 1 Left 1 Front 1 Not Applicabl 5 Deployed-other 4 Shoulder Belt Only Used ABD (knee, air belt, etc. 2 Middle 2 Second 2 Sleeper Section of Truck Ca Ejection (EJECT) ( ) 6 Deployed- 5 lap Belt Only Used 3 Right 3 Third 3 Other Enclose Cargo Area 1 Not Applicable Combination 6 Restraint Used - Type Unknown 77 Other 4 Fourth 4 Unenclosed Cargo Area 1 Not Ejected 2 Not Deplo ed 7 Deployed- Cur tai 7 Child Restraint System - Forward Facin (explain in 77 Other Row 5 Trailing Unit 2 Ejected - Totallyy [�3] 8 Child Restraint System - Rear Facing 3 Deployed- Deployment ❑ narrative) 88 Unknown 6 Riding on Motor Vehicle Exterior (non- 3 Ejected - Partial) 9 Booster Seat 88 Unknown trailing 4 Deployed -Side Unknown unit) 4 Not Applicable 10 Child Restraint -Type Unknown 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Non- Motorist Description Non - Motorist Location At Time of Crash Action Prior to Crash 1 Pedestrian 1 Intersection - Marked Crosswalk 85idewalk 2 Other Pedestrian iwheelchair, person in a 2 Intersection - Unmarked Crosswalk Median /Crossing island 5 Walking /Cycling on Sidewalk d 6 In Ron way Other (work n skater, pe estrian conveyance, etc. 3 Intersection -Other 10 Driveway Access ❑ 3 Bidinfi, 3 Bicyclist 4 Midblock - Marked Crosswalk Si Shared -Use Path or Trail pplaying, etc.) ) Adjacent ❑ 4 Other Cyclist 5 Travel Lane - Other Location 12 Non - Trafficway Area 1 Crossing Roadway 7 to Roadway (e.g., 5 Occupant Motor Vehicle Not in Transpo 6 Bicycle Lane 77 Other, Explain in Narrativ 2 Waiting shoulder, median) of to Cross Roadway rDarked, etc- 7 Shoulder /Roadside 88 Unknown 3 Walking/Cycling Alon 8 Going to or from School (K -1 ) of 5 Occupant a Non -Motor Vehicle Roadwa ih Trffic (in or 9 Working In Trafficway Transportation Device Non - Motorist Actions /Circumstances adjacent to travel lane) (incident response) 7 Unknown Type of Non - Motorist 1 No Improper Action 4 Walking /Cycling Abng 10 None 2 Dart/Dash Roadway Against Traffic (in or 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Safety Equipment 1st 3 Failure to Yield Right -of -Way adjacent to travel lane) 88 Unknown 1 None 5 Lighting 4 Failure to Obey Traffic Signs, 2 Helmet 6 Not Applicable Signals, or Officer 7 Entering /Exiting Parked /Standing 10 Improper Turn /Merge 3 Protective Pads Used 77 Others Explai 5 n Roadway Improperly (standing, Vehicle it Improper Passing (elbows, knees, shins, etc.) in Narrative 2nd Iying, working, playing) 8Inattentive jtalking, eating, etc.) 12 Wrong -Way Riding or Walking 4 Reflective Clothing (Jacket, 88 Unknown 6 Disabled Vehicle Related (working 9 Not Visible (dark clothing, no 77 Other, Explain in Narrative backpack, etc.) on, pushing, leaving /approaching) lighting, etc.) 88 Unknown ALCOHO • SUSPECTED ALCOHOLTESTED: A ESTTYPE ALCOHOL BAC SUSPECTED DRUG TESTED; DRUG TEST TYPE: DRUG TEST RESULT: ALCOHOL USE: 1 Test Not Given F—] Blood TEST RESULT DRUG USE: 1 Test Not Give 1 Blood 1 Positive 11 2 Test Refused 2 Breath 'III 1 Pending 1 No 2T Refused 3 Urine 2 Negative ❑ �' ❑ Li Jain 3 Test Given 3 Urine 2 Yes 3 Test Given 77 Other, 3 Pending Y 2 Completed 2 Yes 88 Unknown 88 Unknown, If Tested 77 Other, Exp in 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 88 Unknown, If Tested Explain in Narrativ 88 Unknown Narrative SOURCE OF TRANSPORTTO MEDICAL FACILI EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACI LITYTRANSPORTEDTO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 2 PALM BCH GDNS FR 6762 ST MARY•S HOSPITAL /TRAUMA CTR 77 Other, Explain In Narrative 88 Unknown PERSON VEHICLEI NAME DATE OF BIRTH INJ SEX LOC: S R 0 EJE HU EP ABD RS 5 2 VIVIANA SILVA 08/25/1992 4 2 3 2 1 1 3 3 3 CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) 'CITY &STATE ZIP CODE 416 WINTER'LIN PALM BEACH GA ENS, FL 33410 SOURCE OF TRANSPORTTO MEDICAL FACILITI EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain In Narrative 88 Unknown 2 PA BCH CNTY FR 6762 ST MARY %S HOSPITAL /TRAUMA CTR PERSON I VEHICLE rME DATE OF BIRTH INJ SEX I LOC: S R O EJE T U EP ABD RS CURRENTADDRESS (Number and Street):': CITY & STATE -.ZIP CODE: SOURCE TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILIT� EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported ported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown HSMV 90010 S (V /P) (rev 10 /10) Page 5 of 9 AARRATIVE 11-005104 X443 THIS CRASH OCCURRED ON NORTHLAKE BLVD. AT THE INTERSECTION OF HIATT DR./ ALISTER BLVD, IN THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS FLORIDA. NORTHLAKE BLVD. IS A SIX LANE HIGHWAY, DIVIDED BY A RAISED CONCRETE MEDIAN WITH A LEFT TURN LANE FOR EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND TRAFFIC. V1 WAS WESTBOUND NORTHLAKE BLVD, IN THE LEFT TURN LANE APPROACHING THE INTERSECTION OF HIATT DR. V2 WAS EASTBOUND NORTHLAKE BLVD, IN THE LEFT LANE APPROACHING THE INTERSECTION OF HIATT DR, NOTE: THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL FOR EASTBOUND AND WESTBOUND TRAFFIC WAS INDICATING GREEN. D1 PROCEEDED TO MAKE A U -TURN TO TRAVEL EASTBOUND ONTO NORTHLAKE BLVD. D1 FAILED TO OBSERVE V2 EASTBOUND VIOLATING V2S RIGHT OF WAY, V2S FRONT END SUBSEQUENTLY COLLIDED WITH V1S RIGHT SIDE. V1 THEN TRAVELED IN A NORTH EAST DIRECTION OVER THE RAISED CONCRETE MEDIAN COMING TO A FINAL REST AGAINST THE NORTH CURB LINE OF NORTHLAKE BLVD, V2 TRAVELED IN A SOUTH EAST DIRECTION OVER THE SOUTH ROADWAY CURB LINE COLLIDING WITH A CONCRETE LIGHT POLE COMING TO A FINAL REST. PALM BEACH GARDENS FIRE RESCUE RESPONDED TO THE SCENE WHERE PASSENGER OF V1 WAS PRONOUNCED DECEASED DUE TO INJURIES. MEDICAL EXAMINERS OFFICE RESPONDED TO THE SCENE, BOTH DRIVERS AND TWO PASSENGERS OF V2 WERE TRANSPORTED TO ST. MARYkS HOSPITAL, OFFICER HANTON RESPONDED TO ST. MARY S HOSPITAL WHERE A BLOOD DRAW WAS TAKEN FROM D1 AND WAS PLACED INTO EVIDENCE. BOTH V1 AND V2 WERE TOWED BY KAUFF'S TOWING TO THEIR IMPOUND. *FEND** PERSON VEH,ICLEJ NAME - DATE OF BIRTH [NJ SEX IOC: S R O EJE HU EP ABD RS I I I I l I `- CURRENT ADDRESS _(Number andStreet) CITY &STATE ` ZIP CODE -- SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILITY---, I EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID I EMS RUN NUMBER I MEDICAL. FArn ITVTRANCDnnTrn Tn 3 :PERSON VEHICLE NAME DATE OF BIRTH -' INJ SEX LOC: S R 1 O IIEJ HU I EP ABO RS CURRENTADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE - -- ZIP CODE - - SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FAClUTn EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, FXDlaln In Narrative 88 Unknown OF VIOLATOR FLSTATUTE FL WISADGENUMBE RANK &NAME' - DEPA 153 OFIC JAMES S ACK LFO PAI POI HSMV 90010 S (N /D) (rev 10!10) Page 6 of 9 CHARGE CITATION NUMBER . �.. • I• • ® 1 ♦ V TOTAL # OF VEHICLE SECTION(S) 0 TOTAL# CRASH DATE OF PERSON SECTION(S) 0 10/27/2011 11- 005104 818 036 MENNEN COUNTYCOD CITY CODE COUNTY OF CRASH PLACE OR CITY OF CRASH - CHECK if WITHII TIME REPORTED TIME DISPATCHED HSMV 90010 S (E) (rev 10/10) Page of 9 CRASH DATE TIME OF CRASH DATE OF REPORT. ' REPORTING AGENCY CASE - NUMBER '- - 'HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER 09/25/2011' 10/27/2011 11- 005104 818 036 MENNEN COUNTYCOD CITY CODE COUNTY OF CRASH PLACE OR CITY OF CRASH - CHECK if WITHII TIME REPORTED TIME DISPATCHED 06 - 78 i I CITY LIMIiS i TIME ON SCENE TIME CLEARED SCENE CHECK IF I—I REASON (if Investigation NOT Compete Notified By: l Motorist COMPLETE Di I 2 taw Enforcement CRASH OCCURRED ON STREET, ROAD, HIGHWAY - - AT STREET ADDRESS# AT LATITUDE AND -. LONGFfUDE AT FEET MILES N S E W -. AT FROM INTERSECTION WITH STREET, ROAD, HIGHWAY - OR FROM MILEPOST# ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ _ Road System identifier 7 Forest Road Type of Shoulder Type of Intersection 1 Interstate 2 U.S. F-1 3 Slate 4 County 8 Private Roadway 1 Paved 1 Not at intersection 5 Traffic Circle 5 Local 9 Parking lot Vd 7 Five -Point, or More 1:1 2 Unpaved F] 2 Four-ay Intersection 6 Roundabout 6 Turnpike/Toll Other, Explain in 3 Curb 3 T- Intersection 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Na Narrative 4 Y- Intersection ®• Light Condition Weather Condition Roadway Surface Condition School Bus Related Manner of Collisionllmpact 1 Daylight 2 Dusk 3 Dawn 5 Dark -Not Lighted 4 Fog, Smog Smoke 5011 1 No 6 Dark - Unknown 5 Sleet /Hall 6 Mud Dirt , Gravel 2 Yes, School Bus 4 Sideswipe, same direction Lighting Freezing ain ❑ 7 Sand ❑ Directly Involved a 5 Sideswipe, Opposite Directio 4 Dark Lighted 77 Other, Explain i 6 Blowing Sand, Soil, 8 Water 3 Yes, School Bus R - (standing/ g 6 Rear to Side Narrative Dirt moving) Indirectly Involve 7 Rear to Rear 1 Clear 1 Dry 1 Front to Rear Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown 2 Cloudy77 2 Wet 2 Front Front Other, Explain ins n7Natmativexplain to 3 Rain 4lce /Frost 3 Angle 88 Narrative 88 Unknown First Harmful Event Non - Collision Collision Non -Fixed Object Collision with Fixed Object First Harmful Event 1 Overturn /Rollover 10 Pedestrian 19 Impact Attenuator /Crash 30 Concrete Traffic Barrier 2 Fire /Explosion 11 Pedalcycle Cushion 31 Other Traffic Barrier Location 1 On Roadway 2 Off 3 Immersion 12 Railway Vehicle (train, 20 Bridge Overhead Structure 32 Tree (standing) Roadway 3 Shoulder 4 Jackknife engine) 21 Bridge Pier or Support 33 Utility Pole/Lig t Support ❑ 5 Cargo /E uipment 13 Animal 22 Bridge Rail 34Traffic Sign Support 4 Median First Harmful Event Loss or Shit 14 Motor Vehicle in Transport 23 Culvert 35 Traffic Signal Support 6 Gore within Interchange 6 Fell /Jumped From 15 Parked Motor Vehicle 24 Curb 36 Other Post, Pole or Supporl 7 Separator 1 No Motor Vehicle 16 Work Zone/Maintenance 25 Ditch 37 Fence 7Thrown or Falling Equipment 26 Embankment 38 Mailbox Objec[ 17 Struck by Faiiling, Shifting 27 Guardrail Face 39 Other Fixed Object (wall, 8 In Parking Lane or Zone 9 Outside Right -of -way 10 Roadside 2 Yes 88 Unknown 8 Ran into Water /Canal Cargo 28 Guardrail End building, tunnel, etc.) 88 Unknown 9 Other Non-Collision 18 Other Non -Fixed Object 29 Cable Barrier First Harmful Event Relation to Contributing Circumstances: Road Contributing Circumstances: Junction 5 Railway Grade Crossing 9 Worn, Travel - Polished Surface 10 Road Surface Condition (wet, ky, snow, slush etc.) Environment 14 Entrance /Exit Ramp IS Crossover- Related 11 Obstruction in Roadway 12 Debris F] F] 1 Non - Junction 16 Shared -Use Path or Trail 1 None 13 Traffic Control Device 2 Intersection 17 Acceleration /Deceleration Lane 18 Through Roadway 4 Work Zone (construction/ Inoperative Missing or Obscured 14 Non Highway Work 1 None 5 Animal(s) in Roadway 2 3Intersection- Related maintenance /utility) - Weather Conditions 77 Other, Explain in 4 Driveway /Alley Access 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 6 Shoulders (none, low, soft, high) 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 3 Physical Obstruction(s) Narrative Related 88 Unknown 7 Rut, Holes, Bumps 88 Unknown 4 Glare 88 Unknown Work Zone Related Crash In Work Zone Type of Work Zone Workers in Work Zone Law Enforcement In 1 No 2 Yes F] 88 Unknown 1 Before the First Work Zone 1 Lane Closure I No Work Zone Warning Sign 2 Lane Shift /Crossover 2 Yes 1 No 2 Advance Warning Area 3 Work on Shoulder or Median 88 Unknown 2 Officer Present 3 Transition Area 4Intermittent or Moving Work 3 Law Enforcement Vehicle 4 Activity Area 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Only Present 5 Termination Area NAME " ADDRESS " CITY & STATE ZIP CODE IVIE r NAME ° ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE ' NAME ADDRESS CITY. & STATE :ZIP CODE VEHICLE: I PERSON 'PROPERTYDAMAGE -OTHER THAN VEHICLE EST.AM00 OWNER'SNAME® (Check if Business) ADDRESS CITY . &STATE ZIP CODE" VEHICLE I PERSON PROPERTY DAMAGE OTHER THAN VEHICLE EST.AMOU OWNER'SNAME® (Check If Business) - .ADDRESS.. CITY . &STATE ZIP CODE HSMV 90010 S (E) (rev 10/10) Page of 9 HSMV 90010 S (N /D) (rev 10/10) CR 809A (NORTHLAKE BLVD) Traffic Arm Drawing Not To Scale. UTILITY LONG FORM SHORT FORM Fjol UPDATE (Shaded Areas) I AN 1:1 TOTAL •: SECTION(S) TOTAL # OF PERSON SECTION(S) 2 TOTAL .; OF NARRATIVE First Harmful Event Relation to Contributing Circumstances: Road Contributing Circumstances: Junction 9 Worn, Travel- Polished Surface Environment 10 Road Surface Condition (wet, 5 Railway Grade Crossing F] F-1 1:1 icy, snow, slush, etc.) 14 Entrance/Exit Ramp 1 Obstruction in Roadway 15 Crossover r - Related 12 2 Debris 1 Non - Junction 16 Shared -Use Path or Trail 1 None 13 Traffic Control Device F F] F] 2 Intersection 17 Acceleration /Deceleration Lane 4 Work Zone (construction/ Inoperative, Missing or Obscured 1 None 5 Animal(s) in Roadway 3 Intersection - Related 18 Through Roadway maintenance /utility) 14 Non - Highway Work 2 Weather Conditions 77 Other, Explain in 4 Driveway /Alley Access 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 6 Shoulders (none, low, soft, high) 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 3 Physical Obstruction(s) Narrative Related 88 Unknown 7 Rut, Holes, Bumps 88 Unknown 4 Glare 88 Unknown Work Zone Related Crash in Work Zone Type of Work Zone Workers in Work Zone Law Enforcement in ❑ 1 No ❑ 1 Before the First Work Zone ❑ 1 Lane Closure ❑ 1 ❑ Work Zone 2 Yes Warning Sign 2 Lane Shift /Crossover Yes 2 Yes 1 No 88 Unknown 2 Advance Warning Area 3 Work on Shoulder or Median 88 Unknown 2 Officer Present 3 Transition Area 4 Intermittent or Moving Work 3 Law Enforcement Vehicle 4 Activity Area 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Only Present 5 Termination Area VEHICLEN PERSONM PROPERTY DAMAGE -OTHER THAN VEH VEHICLE DAMAGE -OTHER THAN VEH ADDRESS EST. • r HSMV 90010 S (E) (rev 10/10) Page .1 of CITY & STATE WEST PALM CITY & STATE CITY & STATE FL 33412 ZIP CODE Ci ly"'A ZIP CODE REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER Check if Commercial 12=0001 06574541 1 Vehicle in Transport VEHICLE LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRE Check if Permanen VIN 2 Parked Motor Vehicl� 9C FL Registratior❑ .1 2712 3 Working Vehicle Hit and Run 1 No YEAR MAKE MODEL STYLE COLOR DAMAGE: 1 Disabling 4 Minor EST. AMOUNT 2 Yes 1991 IT I �° E 2 Functional 88 unknown 88 Unknown 3 None INSURANCE COMPANY INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER Towed due VEHICLE REMOVED BY 1 Rotation to Damage: ❑ 2 Owner Request STATE F MUTUAL 9!72448594 1 No 2 Yes 3 Driver 4 Other Explain in Narrative NAME OF VEHICLE OWNER (Check if Business)❑ CURRENT ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE DAVID C. PAGAN 12651 68TH ST N WEST PALM BCH, FL 33412 TRAILER# LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check if Permanenl VIN YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES Registration❑ TRAILER# LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check if Permaneni VIN YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES Registration❑ VEHICLE N S E W Off -Road Unknown ON STREET, ROAD, HIGHWAY AT EST. SPEE POSTED SPEED TOTAL LANES TRAVELING❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ HAZ. MAT. RELEASED HAZ. MAT. PLACARD HAZ. MAT. NUMBER HAZ. MAT. CLASS Area of Initial Impact , Most Damaged Area 1 No ❑ 1 No ❑ e 2 Yes 2 Yes S a 18 Undercarria a 18 88 Unknown 88 Unknown g MOTOR CARRIER NAME US DOT NUMBER 1 Y� qp i8 19 Overturn 19 19 � *1312 20 Windshield 20 21 filer 21 itl MOTOR CARRIER ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER Vehicle Body Type ❑ Trafficway Commercial Motor Vehicle Configuration 15 Low Speed Vehicle 1 Two -Way, Not Divided 1 Vehicle 10,000 Ibs or less Placarded 8 Tractor /Triple 16 (Sport) Utility Vehicle 2 Two -Way, Not Divided, with a for Hazardous Materials 9 Truck more than 10,000 Ibs (4,53 17 Cargo Van (10 000 Ibs Continuous Left Turn Lane 2 Single -Unit Truck (2 -axle and GVWR kg), Cannot Classif lessf ❑ than 10,000 Ibs (4,536 g) or 3 Two -Way, Divided, Unprotected more (4,536 kg) 10 Bus /large Van seats for 9 -15 1 Passenger Car 18 Motor Coach (painted >4 feet) Median 3 Single -Unit Truck (3 or more axles) occupants, including driver) 2 Passenger Van 19 Other Light Trucks (10,000 Ibs 4 Two -Way, Divided, Positive Mediar 4 Truck Pulling Trailers) 11 Bus (seats for more than 15 3 Pickup (4,536 kg) or less) Barrier 5 Truck Tractor (bobtail)) occupants, including driver) 7 Motor Home 20 Medium /Heavy Trucks (more tha 5 One-Way Trafficway 6 Truck Tractor /Semi - Trailer 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 8 Bus 10,000 Ibs 4,536 g) 88 Unknown Trailer T pe 7 Truck Tractor /Double Trailer 88 Unknown 11 Motorcycle 21 Farm La or Vehic e 77 Other, Explain in Narrative TRAILER 1 TRAILER 2 1 Single Semi Trailer Cargo Body Type 8 Pole Trailer g y 12 Moped gg Unknown 2 Tandem Semi Trailer 13 Intermodal 13 All Terrain Vehicle (ATV) 3 Tank Trailer 9 Towed Vehicle 3 Van /Enclosed Box Container Chassis 10 Auto Transport 4 Hopper Comm/Non-Commercial 4 Saddle Mount /Trailer 14 Vehicle Towing 77 Other, Explain i 5 Pole - Trailer Another Vehicle 1 Interstate Carrier 5 Boat Trailer Narrative 6 Cargo Tank 2 Intrastate Carrier 6 Utility Trailer 88 Unknown 1 No Cargo 7 Flatbed 15 Not Applicable 3 Not in Commerce /Government 7 House Trailer 2 Bus 8 Dump (vehicle 10,000 Ibs (4,536 kg) or less not 4 Not in Commerce /Other Truck 1 10,000 Ibs (4,536k ) or less 9 Concrete Mixer displaying NM placard Most Harmful Event Non - Collision Comm 2 100001- 26,000 Ibs (P4,536- 11,793 kg) 10 Auto Transport 77 Other, Explain in 11 Garbage /Refuse 1 Overturn /Rollover GVWRIGCWR 3 More than 26,000 Ibs (11,793 kg) Narrative 12 Log 2 Fire /Explosion 4 Not Applicable 88 Unknown 3 Immersion Collision with Non -Fixed Object Collision with Non -Fixed Object 4 Jackknife 29 Cable Barrier Emergency 10 Pedestrian 19 Impact Attenuator /Crash Cushion 30 Concrete Traffic Barrier 5 Carggo /Equipment Loss or Shift 11 Pedalc cle p Vehicle Use y 20 Bridge Overhead Structure 31 Other Traffic Barrier 6 Pell/Jumped From Motor Vehicle Sequence of Events 7 Thrown or Falling Object 13 Animal Vehicle (train, engine) 21 Bridge Pier or Support 32 Tree (standing) 2nd 8 Ran into Water /Cana 22 Bridge Rail 33 Utility Pole /Light Support 14 Motor Vehicle in Transport 23 Culvert 34 Traffic Sin Support F] 9 Other Non - Collision g 15 Parked Motor Vehicle 24 Curb 35 Traffic Signal Support H H (40-46 Sequence of Events only 16 Work Zone /Maintenance 25 Ditch 36 Other Post, Pole, or Suppo 1 No 40 Equipment Failure (blown tir Equipment 26 Embankment 37 Fence 2 Yes brake failure, etc.) 17 Struck by Falling, Shifting Cargo or 27 Guardrail Face 38 Mailbox 88 Unknown 3rd 4th 41 Separation of Units An Set in Motion by Motor 28 Guardrail End 39 Other Fixed Object (wall, 42 Ran Off Roadway, Rig Vehicle building, tunnel, etc.) 43 Ran Off Roadway, Lett 18 Other Non -Fixed Object ❑ ❑ 44 Cross Median 45 Cross Centerline Vehicle Maneuver Action Traffic Control Device For Vehicle Defects 46 Downhill Runaway 1 Straight Ahead 13 Stopped in Traffic This Vehicle 3 Turning Left Roadway Grade ❑ 14 Slowing 1 Level Roadway Alignment 4 Backing 15 Negotiating a Curve 8 Flashing Signal 2 Hillcrest 5 Turning Right 16 Leaving Traffic Lane 9 Railway Crossing 12 Suspension 6 Changing Lanes p 3 Uphill 1 Straight 17 Entering raffic Lan Device p 8 Parked g 1 None 13 Wheels 4 Downhill 2 Curve Right 77 Other, Explain in 1 No Controls 10 Person (including 2 Brakes 14 Windows / 10 Making U -Turn ❑ 5 Sag (bottom 3 Curve Left Narrative 4 School Zone Sign/ Flagman, Officer, 3 Tires Windshield 11 Overtaking/ 88 Unknown Device Guard, etc.) 4 Lights (head, 15 Mirrors Passing 5 Traffic Control 13 Warning Sign signal, tail) 16 Truck Coupling/ Special Function 1 No Special Function 9 Ambulance 14 Intercity Bus Signal 77 Other, Explain in 6 Steering Trailer Hitch/ of Motor Vehicle 2 Farm Vehicle 10 Fire Truck 15 Charter/Tour Bus 6 Stop Sign Narrative 7 Wipers Safety Chains 3 Police 11 Farm Labor Transport 16 Shuttle Bus 88 Unknown 7 Yield Sign 9 Exhaust System 77 Other, Explain i 7 Taxi 12 School Bus 17 Farm Labor Bus 10 Body, Doors Narrative 8 Military 13 Transit /Commuter Bus 88 Unknown 11 Power Train 88 Unknown PERSON # NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON # NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON # NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER HSMV 90010 S (V /P) (rev 10/10) Page 2 of REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER 12m000193 06574541 12Parked 7Motor VEHICLE LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRE Check if Permanen VIN � 522 F FL Registratio ❑ 35 3 1 No YEAR MAKE MODEL STYLE 1 COLOR DAMAGE: 1 Disabling 4 Minor ❑ EST. AMOUNT 2 Yes 2009 HYUN ELANTRA 4DR SIL 2 Functional 88 Unknown 88 unknown 1 I 3 None INSURANCE COMPANY IRANCE POLICY NUMBER Towed due ❑ to Damage: VEHICLE REMOVED BY 1 Rotation 2 Owner Request EIC I 1 No 2 Yes 4 Other Explain in NarraJive- NAME OF VEHICLE OWNER (Check if Business)❑ CURRENT ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE WILLIAM J. RICE 10370 S i CE WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33412 TRAILER44 LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check if Permaneril VIN YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES Registration❑ TRAILERV LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check if Permaneril VIN YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES Registration[] VEHICLE N S E W Off -Road Unknown ON STREET, ROAD, HIGHWAY AT EST. SPEE POSTED SPEED TOTAL LANES TRAVELING❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ HAZ. MAT. RELEASED 1 No ❑ 2 Yes 88 Unknown I AZ. MAT. PLACARD 1 No 2 Yes 88 Unknown HAZ. MAT. NUMBER HAZ. MAT. CLASS Area of Initial Impact Most Damaged Area 4 e ' 18 Undercarria a 18 a 4 e g A2'3' qtg 1y 19 0Vert UFn 19 W 18 It MOTOR CARRIER NAME US DOT NUMBER 20 Windshield 20 .12 11 10 0 21 Trailer 2? 14 13 12 11 1B MOTOR CARRIER ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER Vehicle Body Type ❑ Trafficway Commercial Motor Vehicle Configuration 15 Low Speed Vehicle 1 Two -Way, Not Divided 1 Vehicle 10,000 Ibs or less Placarded 8 Tractor/Triple 16 (Sport) Utility Vehicle 2 Two -Way, Not Divided, with a for Hazardous Materials 9 Truck more than 10,000lbs (4,53 F-1 17 Cargo Van (10 000 Ibs Continuous Left Turn Lane 2 Single -Unit Truck (2 -axle and GVWR kg), Cannot Classify (4,536 kg) or less1 ❑ more than 10,000 Ibs (4,536 kg) 3 Two -Way, Divided, Unprotected 10 Bus /Large Van seats for 9 -15 1 Passenger Car 18 Motor Coach (painted >4 feet) Median 3 Single -Unit Truck (3 or more axles) occupants, including driver) 2 Passenger Van 19 Other Light Trucks (10,000 Ibs 4 Two -Way, Divided, Positive Mediar 4 Truck Pulling Trailer(s) 11 Bus (seats for more than 15 ts, driver 3 Pickup (4,536 kg) or less) Barrier 5 Truck Tractor (bobtail)) occupants, g ) t plainin 7 Motor Home 20 Medium /Heavy Trucks (more tha 5 One Trafficway 6 Truck Tractor /Semi - Trailer 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 8 Bus 10,000 Ibs (4,536 kg)) 88 Unknown Trailer Type 7 Truck Tractor /Double Trailer 88 Unknown 11 Motorcycle 21 Farm Labor Vehicle 77 Other, Explain in Narrative TRAILER 1 TRAILER 2 1 Single Semi Trailer Cargo Body Type 12 Moped 8 Pole Trailer 9 Y YP 88 Unknown 2 Tandem Semi Trailer 13 Container ha 13 All Terrain Vehicle (ATV) 3 Tank Trailer 9 Towed Vehicle 1:1 3 Van /Enclosed Box Container Chassis Comm /Non- Commercial 4 Saddle Mount /Trailer 10 Auto Transport 4 Hopper 14 Vehicle Towing 77 Other, Explain i 5 Pole- Trailer p 5 Boat Trailer Another Vehicle 1 Interstate Carrier 5 Utility Trailer Narrative 1 No Caro 6 Cargo Tank A Not Applicable 2 Intrastate Carrier y Cargo 88 Unknown Flatbed (vehicle 10,000 Ibs 3 Not in Commerce /Government 7 House Trailer 2 Bus 8 Dump (4,536 kg) or less not 4 Not in Commerce /Other Truck 110,000lbs (4,536k ) or less 9 Concrete Mixer displaying NM placard Most Harmful Event Non Collision Comm 2 10,001- 26,000 Ibs 4,536- 11,793 kg) 10 Auto Transport 77 Other, Explain in - 11 Garbage /Refuse ❑ 1 Overturn /Rollover GVWR/GCWR 3 More than 26,000 bs ( 11,793 k g) 12 Lo Narrative 2 Fire /Explosion 4 Not Applicable g 88 Unknown 3 Immersion Collision with Non -Fixed Object Collision with Non -Fixed Object 29 Cable Barrier Emergency 4 Jackknife 10 Pedestrian 19 Impact Attenuator Crash Cushion 30 Concrete Traffic Barrier 5 Carggo /Equipment Loss or Shift 11 Pedalc cle p / Vehicle Use y 20 Bridge Overhead Structure 31 Other Traffic Barrier 6 Fell /Jum Jumped From Motor Vehicle p 12 Railway Vehicle (train, engine) 21 Bride Pier or Support Sequence of Events 7 Thrown or Fallin Object g PP 32 Tree (standing) 13 Animal 22 Bridge Rail 33 Utility Pole/Light Su 1st 2nd 8 Ran into Water/ anal 14 Motor Vehicle in Trans ort g ty Support P 23 Culvert ❑ 34 Traffic Sign Support 9 Other Non - Collision u 15 Parked Motor Vehicle 24 Curb 35 Traffic Signal Support El [40 -46 sequence of Events only 16 Work Zone /Maintenance 25 Ditch 36 Other Post, Pole, or Suppor 1 No 40 Equipment Failure (blown tir Equipment 26 Embankment 37 Fence 2 Yes brake failure, etc.) 17 Struck by Falling, Shifting Cargo or 27 Guardrail Face 38 Mailbox 88 Unknown 3rd 4th 41 Separation of Units Anything Set in Motion by Motor 28 Guardrail End 39 Other Fixed Object (wall, 43 Ran Off Roadway, Left 18 Other Non -Fixed Object ❑ ❑ 42 Ran Off Roadway, Rig Vehicle building, tunnel, etc.) 44 Cross Median 45 Cross Centerline Vehicle Maneuver Action Traffic Control Device For Vehicle Defects 46 Downhill Runawa 1 Straight Ahead 13 Stopped in Traffic This Vehicle Roadway Grade ❑ 3 Turning Left 14 Slowing ❑ 4 Backin Curve 8 Flashing Signal F] 1 Level Roadway Alignment g 15 Negotiating a 2 Hillcrest 5 Turning Right 16 Leaving Traffic Lane 9 Railway Crossing 12 Suspension 3 Uphill 1 Straight 6 Changing Lanes 17 Entering Traffic Lan Device 8 Parked 1 None 13 Wheels 4 Downhill 2 Curve Right 77 Other, Explain in 1 No Controls 10 Person (including 2 Brakes 14 Windows/ 5 Sag (bottom 3 Curve Left 10 Making U -Turn Narrative 4 School Zone Sign/ Flagman, Officer, 3 Tires ❑ 11 Overtaking/ Windshield 88 Unknown Device Guard, etc.) 4 Lights (head, 15 Mirrors Passing 5 Traffic Control 13 Warning Sign signal, tail) 16 Truck Coupling/ Special Function 1 No Special Function 9 Ambulance 14 Intercity Bus Signal 77 Other, Explain in 6 Steering Trailer Hitch/ of Motor Vehicle 2 Farm Vehicle 10 Fire Truck 15 Charter/Tour Bus 6 Stop Sign Narrative 7 Wipers Safety Chains 3 Police it Farm Labor Transport 16 Shuttle Bus 7 Yield Sign 88 Unknown 9 Exhaust System 77 Other, Explain i 7 Taxi 12 School Bus 17 Farm Labor Bus 10 Body, Doors Narrative 8 Military 13 Transit /Commuter Bus 88 Unknown 11 Power Train 88 Unknown PERSON # NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON # NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON # NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER HSMV 90010 S (V /P) (rev 10/10) Page 3 of REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER 12=000193 06574541 1 Driver VEHICLE # NAME PHONE NUMBER Check if 2 Non - Motorist Recommend 3 Passenger I Driver Re -exam❑ CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE ZIP CODE 12651 68TH ST N WEST PALM BCH, FL 33412 DATE OF BIRTH SEX: DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER STATE EXPIRES INJURY SEVERITY (INJ) 1 Male 1 None 4 Incapacitating 08/01/1960 2 Female 2S�.�62�1 F� 08/01/2012 2 Possible 5 Fatal (within 30 days) ❑ 88 Unknown 3 Non - incapacitating 6 Non - Traffic Fatality DL Type Required Endorsements Drivers Actions at Time of Crash 1A 2 B 3C 1 Yes 1st 1 No Contributing Action 26 Ran off Roadway 3rd Condition At 4 D /Chauffeur 2 No F�2] 2 0 erated MV in Careless or 27 Disregarded other Traffic ❑ Time of Crash 5 E /Operator li Sign 6 E /Oper - Rest 3 No Req. Endorsement Negligent Manner 28 Disregarded Other Road 1 Apparently Normal 7 None 3 Failed to Yield Right -of -Way Markings 3 Asleep or Fatigued 4 Improper Backing 29 Over- Correcting /Over- 5 III (sick) or Fatigued Driver Distracted By 4 Other Inside the Vehicle 6 Improper Turn Steering 6 Seizure, Epilepsy, Blackout 1 Not Distracted (Explain in Narrative) 2nd 10 Followed too Closely 30 Swerved or Avoided: Due 4th 7 Physically Impaired 5 External Distraction 11 Ran Red Light to Wind, Slippery Surface, M 8 Emotional (de ression, 2 Electronic Communication PP Y Devices (cell phone, etc.) (outside the vehicle, explai 12 Drove too Fast for Conditions Object, Non - Motorist in angry, disturbed, etc.) n narrative 13 Ran Stop Sign 9 Under the Influence of 3 Other Electronic Device ) Roadway, etc. (navigation device, DVD player) 6 Texting 15 Improper Passing 31 Operated MV in Erratic, Medications /Drugs /Alcohol 7 Inattentive 17 Exceeded Posted Speed p 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown 21 Wrong Side of Wrong Way Reckless or Aggressive Manner 88 Unknown Driver Vison Obstructions 25 Failed to Keep in Proper Lane 77 Other Contributing Factor 1 Vision Not Obscured 5 Load on Vehicle 9 Smoke Z Inclement Weather 6 Building /Fixed Object 10 Glare ®' • • ' 3 Parked /Stopped Vehicle 7 Signs /Billboards 77 All Other, Explain Helmet Use (HU) Eye Protection (EP) 4 Trees /Crops /Bushes 8 Fog in Narrative Restraint Systems 1 DOT- Compliant 1 Yes ®' ®' ❑ Motorcycle Het ❑ 2 No (RS) 2 Other Helmet 3 Not Applicable Motor Vehicle Seating Position: LOCATION: SEAT ROW OTHER 3 No Helmet 1 Not Applicable Seat Row Other (LOC) El F-1 None Used -Motor Vehicle Occupant Air Bag Deployed 5 Deployed -Other 3 Shoulder and Lap Belt Used 1 Left 1 Front 1 Not Applicabl ABD (knee, air belt, etc. 4 Shoulder Belt Only Used 2 Middle 2 Second 2 Sleeper Section of Truck Cab ( ) 5 Lap Belt Only Used 3 Right 3 Third 3 Other Enclose Cargo Area EJ¢CtlOn (EJECT) 6 Deployed- 6 Restraint Used -Type Unknown 1 Not Applicable Combination yp 77 Other 4 Fourth 4 Unenclosed Cargo Area 1 Not Ejected ❑ 7 Child Restraint System - forward Facin 2 Not Deployed 7 Deployed -Curtai (explain in 77 Other Row 5 Trailing Unit 2 Ejected - Totally 3 Deployed -Front 88 Deployment 8 Child Restraint System -Rear Facing narrative) 88 Unknown 6 Riding on Motor Vehicle Exterior (non- 3 Ejected - Partial 9 Booster Seat 4 Deployed -Side Unknown 88 Unknown trailing unit) 4 Not Applicable 10 Child Restraint -Type Unknown 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Non - Motorist Description Non - Motorist Location At Time of Crash Action Prior to Crash 1 Pedestrian 1 Intersection - Marked Crosswalk 8 Sidewalk 2 Other Pedestrian (wheelchair, person in a 2 Intersection - Unmarked Crosswalk 9 Median /Crossing Island 5 Walkin /aycing on Sidewalk d 6 In Roadwa Other (working building, skater, pedestrian conveyance, etc. 3 Intersection -Other 10 Driveway Access y 3 Bicyclist ❑ 4 Travel a -Marked Crosswalk it Shared -Use Path or Trail playing, j etc.) 4 Other Cyclist 5 Travel Lane -Other Location 12 Non - Trafficway Area 1 Crossing Roadway 7 shoulder, to Roadway (e.g., 5 Occupant of Motor Vehicle Not in Transpo 6 Bicycle Lane 77 Other, Explain in Narrativ 2 Waiting to Cross Roadway shoulder, median) (parked, etc. 7 Shoulder /Roadside 88 Unknown 3 Walking/Cycling Alon 8 Going to or from School (K -i ) 6 Occupant of a Non -Motor Vehicle Roadwa ih Trffic (in or 9 Working in Trafficway Non - Motorist Actions /Circumstances (incident response) Transportation Device adjacent to travel lane) 10 None 7 Unknown Type of Non- Motorist 1 No Improper Action 4 Walking /Cycling Along 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 2 Dart /Dash Roadway Against Traffic (in or 88 Unknown Safety Equipment tst 3 Failure to Yield Right -of -Way adjacent to travel lane) 1 None 5 Lighting 4 Failure to Obey Traffic Signs, 2 Helmet 6 Not Applicable Signals, or Officer 7 Entering /Exiting Parked /Standing 10 Improper Turn /Merge 3 Protective Pads Used 77 Other, Explai ❑ 5 In Roadway Improperly (standing, Vehicle 11 Improper Passing lying, working, p aying) 8 Inattentive talkingg eating, (elbows, knees, shins, etc.) 8 Narrative 2nd 6 Disabled Vehicle Related (working 9 Not Visible dark clothing, no c) 77 Other, Explain iin Narrativeking 4 Reflective Clothing (jacket, 88 Unknown backpack, etc.) on, pushing, leaving /approaching) lighting, etc.) 88 Unknown • • SUSPECTED ALCOHOL TESTED: ALCOHOL TESTTYPE ALCOHOL BAC SUSPECTED DRUG TESTED: DRUGTESTTYPE: 7M ESTRESULT: ALCOHOL USE: 1 Test Not Given 1 Blood TEST RESULT DRUG USE: 1 Test Not Give 1 Blood 1 Positive 1 No 2 Test Refused 2 Breath 1 Pending 1 No 2 Test Refused 3 Urine 2 Negative 2 Yes ❑ 3 Test Given 3 Urine 2 Completed F7 2 Yes 3 Test Given 77 Other, ❑ 3 Pending ❑ 88 Unknown 88 Unknown, if Tested 77 Other, Explain in 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 88 Unknown, if Tested Explain in Narrativ 88 Unknown Narrative SOURCE OF TRANSPORTTO MEDICAL FACILIT� EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown ®e • IM M14a PERSON I VEHICLE NAME DATE OF BIRTH INJ SEX I LOC: S R 0 EJEJ HU I EP ABD RS CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE ZIP CODE SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILITn EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown PERSON VEHICLE NAME DATE OF BIRTH INJ SEX LOC: S R 0 EJEJ HU EP ABD RS CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE ZIP CODE SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILITn EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown HSMV 90010 S (V /P) (rev 10/10) Page 4 of 6 HSMV 90010 S (V /P) (rev 10/10) Page of HSMV CRASH lane just west of its The witness was eastbound also and had stopped in the center lanes due to a stopped school bus on the east side of the intersection. He saw v -2 come to a normal stop in the left lane, After five to ten seconds v -1 crashed into the rear of v -2. Driver 1 states that he was in the left lane and v -2 was in the center lane. As they approached the intersection v -2 made a sudden lane change to the left lane then came to a quick stop due to the stopped school bus. He was unable to now get stopped before crashing into the rear of v -21 Driver 2 states that he had been in the left lane and came to a stop foe the school bus and had been stopped for a few seconds when he was hit from behind by v -11 This investigator finds that driver 1 violated Florida State Statute 316.1925(1)® CARELESS DRIVING, Any person operating a vehicle upon the streets or highways within the state shall drive the same in a careful and prudent manner, having regard for the width, grade, curves, corners, traffic, and all other attendant circumstances, so as not to endanger the life, limb, or property of any person. Failure to drive in such manner shall constitute careless driving. CURRENT ADDRESS 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other. Exolain in Narrative 88 Unknown ADDRESS SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILITn 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other. Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown PERSON # NAME OF VIOLATOR �J FTIR 4161111 FL STATUTE NUMBER DATE OF BIRTH EMS RUN NUMBER DATE OF BIRTH I Oki •1II11•1Al:l ll S c C R . 0 MEDICAL INJ I SEX MEDICAL FACILITY CHARGE * *END ** HU I E IL HU I EP I ABD I RS ZIP CODE '�•, ILTiI "IA CITATION NUMBER ■ ■ EMS TOTAL :. CITY &STATE • TOTAL ADDRESS _ OF PERSON • TOTAL ADDRESS - CITY &STATE • Light Condition Weather Condition Roadway Surface Condition School Bus Related Manner of Collision /Impact 1 Daylight 5 Dark -Not Lighted 4 Fog, Smog Smoke 5 Oil 1 No 2 Dusk 6 Dark- Unknown 5 Sleet /Hail 6 Mud, Dirt, Gravel 2 Yes, School Bus 4 Sideswipe, same direction g 3 Dawn Lighting Freezing Rain 7 Sand Direct) Involved Fil p Opposite Directio p 1 8 5 Rear to e, O 4 Dark - Lighted 77 Other, Explain i 6 Blowing Sand, Soil, 8 Water (standing/ 3 Yes, School Bus 6 Rear to Side Narrative Dirt moving) Indirectly Involve 7 Rear to Rear 1 Clear 1 Dry 1 Front to Rear 88 Unknown 7 Severe Crosswinds 77 Other, Explain 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 2 Cloudy 77 Other, Explain In 2 Wet in Narrative 2 Front to Front 88 Unknown Other, Exp 3 Rain Narrative 4 Ice /Frost gg Unknown 3 Angle First Harmful Event Non - Collision Collision Non -Fixed Object Collision with Fixed Object First Harmful Event 1 Overturn /Rollover 10 Pedestrian 19 Impact Attenuator /Crash 30 Concrete Traffic Barrier Location 2 Fire /Explosion 11 Pedalcycle Cushion 31 Other Traffic Barrier 1 On Roadway 3 Immersion 12 Railway Vehicle (train, 20 Bridge Overhead Structure 32 Tree (standing) 2 Off Roadway 4 Jackknife engine) 21 Bridge Pier or Support 33 Utility Pole /Light Support 3 Shoulder 5 Cargo /E44uipment 13 Animal 22 Bridge Rail 34 Traffic Sign Support 1 4 Median nt First Harmful Eve Loss or 5h%1 14 Motor Vehicle in Transport 23 Culvert 35 Traffic Signal Support 6 Gore within Interchange 6 Fell /Jumped From 15 Parked Motor Vehicle 24 Curb 36 Other Post, Pole or Supporl 7 Separator Motor Vehicle 16 Work Zone /Maintenance 25 Ditch 37 Fence 8 In Parking Lane or Zone 1 No 7Thrown or Falling Equipment 26 Embankment 38 Mailbox 9Outside Right -of-way al 2 Yes Object 17 Struck by Failling, Shifting 27 Guardrail Face 39 Other Fixed Object (wall, SO Roadside 88 Unknown 8 Ran into Water /Canal Cargo 28 Guardrail End building, tunnel, etc.) 88 Unknown 9 Other Non-Collision 18 Other Non -Fixed Object 29 Cable Barrier First Harmful Event Relation to Contributing Circumstances: Road Contributing Circumstances: 9 Worn, Travel - Polished Surface Junction 10 Road Surface Condition (wet, Environment 5 Railway Grade Crossing ❑ ❑ ❑ isy, snow, slush etc-) 1 14 Entrance /Exit Ramp 11 Obstruction in Roadway 15 Crossover - Related 12 Debris 1 Non - Junction 16 Shared -Use Path or Trail 1 None 13 Traffic Control Device Fil F] F] 2 Intersection 17 Acceleration /Deceleration Lane 4 Work Zone (construction/ Inoperative Missing or Obscured 1 None 5 Animal(s� in Roadway 3 Intersection - Related 18 Through Roadway maintenance utility) 14 Non- Hig(tway Work 2 Weather Conditions 77 Other, xplain in 4 Driveway /Alley Access 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 6 Shoulders (none, low, soft, high) 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 3 Physical Obstruction(s) Narrative Related 88 Unknown 7 Rut, Holes, Bumps 88 Unknown 4 Glare 88 Unknown Work Zone Related Crash in Work Zone Type of Work Zone Workers in Work Zone Law Enforcement in 1 No 1 Before the First Work Zone 1 Lane Closure 1 No Work Zone 2 Yes ❑ Warning Sign ❑ 2 Lane Shift/Crossover Shoulder o ❑ 2 Yes ❑ 1 No j, 88 Unknown 2 Advance Warning Area 3 Work on Shoulder or Median 88 Unknown 2 Officer Present 3 Transition Area 4 Intermittent or Moving Work 3 Law Enforcement Vehicle 4 Activity Area 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Only Present 5 Termination Area NAME ADDRESS CITY &STATE ZIP CODE NAME:.- ADDRESS _ - -. CITY STATE - - .ZIP CODE.. NAME ADDRESS - CITY &STATE - ZIP CODE VEHICLE PERSON PROPERTY .DAMAGE -OTHER THAN VEHICLE EST.AMOU. OWNER'SNAME® .(Check if Business) ADDRESS CITY &STATE -- ZIP LODE VIHICIEJ PERSON 'PROPERTYDAMAGE -OTHER THAN VEHICLE EST.AMOUNJ OWNER'SNAME® (CheckifBusiness) - ADDRESS CITY &STATE ZIP CODE HSMV 90010 S (E) (rev 10/10) Page .1 of `REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER - HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER -. 11=002684 81843854 rWorkingVehlcle sport VEHICLE LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRE Check if Permanen VIN Vehid Registratio e 4NPi/ FL / /211 CA13 959 YEAR MAKE MODEL - STYLE - COLOR DAMAGE 1 Disabling 4 Minor E57. AMOUNT 8e unknown CHi/ S RED/ 2FUnctional88Unknown� q® 3 None INSURANCE COMPANY INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER Towed due VEHICLE REMOVED BY 1 Rotation to Damage: ❑ 'TOWING ROTATION z owner Request 1 GEIC 4198879092 1 No 2 Yes 3 Driver 4 Other Explain in Narra ive NAME OF VEHICLE OWNER (Check If Business - CURREN7ADDRESS -. CITY &STATE. - ZIP CODE' ANDREA RODRIGUEZ 1382' DAKOTA DR JUPITEk FL 33458 TRAILER LICENSE NUMBER STATE - REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check if Permanen VIN YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES Registratior�( !TRAILER :LICENSE NUMBER -STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check if Permanen VIN - - - YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES Registratior{�j VEHICLE N S E W Off -Road Unknown ON STREET, ROAD, HIGHWAY AT EST. SPEE POSTED SPEED TOTAL LANES TRAVELING ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ NORTH ICE BLVD, C, R. 809A 55 I HAZ. MAT. RELEASED HAZ. MAT. PLACARD HAZ. MAT. NUMBER HAZ. MAT. CLASS Area of Initial Impact I Most Damaged Area 1 No 1 No 2Yes 2Ye5 4 $ { 8 ® 19 Undercarriage 18 M11 4 6 88 Unknown 88 Unknown g 19 Overturn 19 M070R CARRIER NAME US DOT NUMBER f 96 t® 97 a 70 Windshield 20 21 TrL _�iler 21 i2 if f6 MOTOR CARRIER ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER Vehicle Body Type Traffrcway Commercial Motor Vehicle Configuration 15 Low Speed Vehicle 1 Two -Way, Not Divided 1 Vehicle 10,000lbs or less Placarded 8 Tractor/Triple 16 (Sport) Utility Vehicle 2 Two -Way, Not Divided, with a for Hazardous Materials 9 Truck more than 10,000lbs (4,53 [16] 17 Cargo Van (10 000lbs Continuous Left Turn Lane 2 Single -Unit Truck (2 -axle and GVWR kg Cannot Classi ❑ , (4,536 kg) or Iessf 3 Two -Way, Divided, Unprotected more than 10,000 Ibs (4,536 kg) SO)Bus Van for /Large seats 9 -15 1 Passenger Car 18 Motor Coach (painted >4 feet) Median 3 Single -Unit Truck (3 or more axles) occupants, including driver) 19 Other Light Trucks (10,000lbs q Two -Wa , 2 Passenger Van y, Divided Positive Mediar 4 Truck Pulling Trailers it Bus (seats for more than 15 4,536 kg) or less) Barrier 5 Truck Tractor bobtail 3 Pickup f occupants, including driver} 7 Motor Home 0 Medium Hea Trucks (more tha 5 One -Way Trafficway 6 TruckTractor /Semi- Trailer 77 Other, Explain In Narrative 8 Bus 10,000 Ibs 4,536 )) 88 Unknown Trailer T e 7 Truck Tractor /Double Trailer 88 Unknown 11 Motorcycle 21 Farm La or Veh cle 77 Other, Explain in Narrative TRAILER 1 TRAILER 2 1 Single Semi Trailer i2 Moped P g 8 Pole Trailer Cargo Body Type 88 Unknown 2 Tandem Semi Trailer 13 Intermodal 13 All Terrain Vehicle (ATV) 3 Tank Trailer 9 Towed Vehicle 3 Van Enclosed Box Container Chassis 10 Auto Transport 4 Hop Comm /Non- Commercial ❑ ❑ 4 Saddle Mount/Trailer 14 Vehicle Towing 77 Other, Explain 1 5 Po e- Trailer 1 Interstate Carrier 5 BoatTraller Another Vehicle 6 Utility Trailer Narrative 6 Cargo Tank 15 Not A livable 2 Intrastate Carrier Y 88 Unknown 1 No Cargo 7 Flatbed pp 3 Not in Commerce /Government 7 House Trailer 2 Bus 8 (vehicle 10 000lbs Dump 14,536 kg) or less not 4 Not in Commerce /Other Truck 84,536k Bg 9 Concrete Mixer 110 displaying Most Harmful Event Non - Collision Comm 210,OOL26,0 Ibs 14 536 - 11,793 kg) 10 Auto Transport r, Explaina�n ❑ 1 Overturn /Rollover GVWRIGCWR 3 More than 26,000 bs (11,793 kg) 11 Garbage /Refuse Narrative 12 Log 4 Not Applicable 2 Fire /Explosion PP 88 Unknown 3 Immersion Collision with Non -Fixed Object Collision with Non -Fixed Object 29 Cable Barrier Emergency R14 4 Jackknife 10 Pedestrian 5 Car o /Equipment loss or Shift 19 Impact Attenuator /Crash Cushion 30 Concrete Traffic Barrier 11 Pedalcycle 20 Brid Vehicle Use 6 Fell Jumped From Motor Vehicle ge Overhead Structure 31 Other Traffic Barrier 8 Ran into WaterJCanal 13 Animal 22 Bridge Rail 33 Utility Pole /Light Support Sequence of Events 7 Thrown or Fallingg Ob))'ect 12 Railway Vehicle (train, engine) 21 Bridge Pier or Support 32 Tree (standing] Fil 1st 2nd 14 Motor Vehicle In Transport 23 Culvert 34 Traffic Si 9 DtherN0n- Collision gn Support 15 Parked Moor Vehicle 24 Curb 35 Traffic Signal Support /40- 465equence of Events only 16 Work Zone /Maintenance 25 Ditch 36 Other Post, [14] Pole, or Suppo 1 No 40 Equipment Failure (blown tir Equipment 26 Embankment 37 Fence 2 Yes brake failure, etc.) 17 Struck by Falling, Shifting Cargo or 27 Guardrail Face 38 Mailbox 3rd 4th 41 Separation of Units An thing Set in Motion b Motor $8 Unknown ❑ n g Y 28 Guardrail End 39 Other Fixed , etc.) (wall, 42 Ran Off Roadway, III Ve lcle building, tunnel, etc.) 43 Ran Off Roadway, Left 18 Other Non -Fixed Object 44 Cross Median 45 Cross Centerline Vehicle Maneuver Action Traffic Control Device For Vehicle Defects 46 Downhill Runawa 1 Straight Ahead 13 Stopped In Traffic This Vehicle Roadway Grade 3 Turning Left 14 Slowing ❑ 1 Level Roadway Alignment 4 Backing 15 Negotiating a Curve 5 8 Flashing Signal 1 2 Hillcrest g Right ❑5 Chang 16 Leaving Traffic Lane 9 Railway Crossing 12 Suspension ❑ 6 3 U hill 1 Straight 6 Changing Lanes 17 Entering Traffic Lan Device P 1 p g Parked 1 None 13 Wheels 4 Downhill 2 Curve Right 77 O[her, Explain in 1 No Controls 10 Person (including 2 Brakes 14 Windows / 1 lo Makin U -Turn 5 Sag (bottom 3 Curve Left Narrative 4 School Zone Sin Flagman, Officer, 11 Overt lin Sign/ g 3 Tight Windshield � 88 Unknown Device Guard, etc.) 4 Lights (head, 15 Mirrors Passing 5 Traffic Control 13 Warning Sin signal, tail) 16 Truck Coupling/ Special Function 1 No Special Function 9 Ambulance 14 Intercity Bus Signal 77 Other, Exp Sig in 6 Leering Trailer Hitch) of Motor Vehjcle 2 Farm Vehicle 10 Fire Truck 15 Charter/Tour Bus 6 Stop Sign Narrative 7 Wipers Safety Chains 1 3 Police 11 Farm Labor Transport 16 Shuttle Bus 7 Yield Sign 88 Unknown 9 Exhaust System 77 Other, Explain i 7 Taxi 12 School Bus 17 Farm Labor Bus 10 Body, Doors Narrative 8 Military 13 Transit /Commuter Bus 88 Unknown 1 11 Power Train 88 Unknown • r • PERSON k NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER 1 ANDREA RODRIGUEZ 316,1925(1) CARELESS - CARELESS DRIVING 8995 -RMD 2 PERSON it NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON N NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER HSMV 90010 S (VIP) (rev 10/10) Page .L of REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER - HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER Check if Commercial 11=002684 81843854 1 Vehicle in Transport VEHICLE LICENSE NUMBER STATE' I TION EXPIRE Check if Permanen VIN 2 Parked Motor Vehicl Registratiorl Working Vehicle 5 N P FL 3/2 11 ITC 14A T s�2343 3 Hit and Run Lil YEAR MAKE MODEL STYLE - COLOR DAMAGE: �nknown� EST. AMOUNT 2Yes 1J N 2 N/ itN 2FFun Functional 88 21000 88 Unknown 3 None INSURANCE COMPANY INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER Towed due to Damage: ❑ VEHICLE REMOVED BY TOWING ROTATION 1 Rotation 2 Owner Request OCEAN 0 CASUAL INS JA3267831901 1 No 2 Yes 3 Driver 4 Other Ez lain in NaTaive NAME OF VEHICLE OWNER (Check If Business)[] CURRENTADDRESS CITY &STATE - ZIP CODE RAYMOND a WILLIAMS 12669 77TH PL WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33412 TRAILER LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check if Permanen VIN '. YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES Registration❑ TRAILERA LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check if Permanen 'VIN YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES Registration[] VEHICLE N S E W Off -Road Unknown ON STREET, ROAD, HIGHWAY AT EST. SPEE POSTED SPEED TOTAL LANES TRAVELING❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ NORTH ICE BLVD (C. R. 809A) 3 HAZ. MAT. RELEASED 1 No HAZ. MAT. PLACARD 1 No HAZ. MAT. NUMBER HAZ. MAT. CLASS Area of Initial Impact —� Most Damaged Area ❑ a 4 B e 88 Unknown 88 Unknown v 18 undercarriage 1E a 4 7 y iia 1® 17 19 Overturn 19 ' is 1101 17 a MOTOR CARRIER NAME U5 DOT NUMBER 20 Windshield 20 1 13 1B ii 90 a 21 Tr�_aile, 121 T 13 12 11 10 L is MOTOR CARRIER ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER Vehicle Body Type Trafficway Commercial Motor Vehicle Configuration 15 Lows eed Vehicle 1 Two -Way, Not Divided 1 Vehicle 10,000 lbs or less Placarded 8 Tractor/Triple F3 16 (Sport ) Utility Vehicle 2 Two-Way, Not Divided, with a 1:1 for Hazardous Materials 9 Truck more than 10,000 Ibs (4,53 17 Cargo Van (10 OOO Ibs 2 Single -Unit Truck (2 -axle GVWR Continuous Left Turn Lane and kg), Cannot Class! (4,536 kg) or less 3 Two -Way, Divided, Unprotected more than SO,0001bs (4,536 kg) 10 Bus /Large Van seats for 9 -15 1 Passenger Car 18 Motor Coach (painted >4 feet) Median 3 Single -Unit Truck (3 or more axles) occupants, including driver) 19 Other Light Trucks (10,000lbs 4 Truck Pulling Trailer s) 11 Bus (seats for more 15 2 Passenger Van g 4Two -Way, Divided, Positive Media 5Truck Tractor (bobtail) driver) 3 Pickup 4,536 kg) or less) Barrier occupants, including driver) / 7 Motor Home 20 Medium/Heavy Trucks (more tha 5 one-way Trafficway 6 Truck Tractor Semi Trailer 77 Other, Explain In Narrative 8 Bus 10,000 Ibs 64,536 kg)) 88 Unknown Trailer T e 7 Truck Tractor /Double Trailer 88 Unknown it Motorcycle 21 Farm Labor Vehicle 77 Other, Explain in Narrative TRAILER 1 TRAILER 2 1 Single Semi Trailer Cargo Body Type 12 Moped 8 pole 9 Y Yp 88 Unknown 2 Tandem Semi Trailer 13 Container ha 13 All Terrain Vehicle (ATV) 3 Tank Trailer 9 Towed Vehicle 3 Van /Enclosed Box Container Chassis Comm/Non-Commercial ❑ 4 Saddle Mount/Trailer SD Auto Transport 4Hopper 14 VehicleTowin g 77 Other, Ex lain i 5 Pole- Trailer p 5 Boat Trailer Another Vehicle S Interstate Carrier 6 Utility Trailer Narrative 1 No Caro 6 Flat edank 15 Not Applicable 2 Intrastate Carrier y 86 Unknown g 7 Flatbed vehicle 1p 000 ibs 3 Not in Commerce /Government 7 House Trailer 2 Bus 8 Dump ' kg) less 4 Not in Commerce /OtherTrutk 4,536 or not 110,000ibs ((4,536kggJ or less 9 Concrete Mixer displaying NM placard Comm l0 Auto Transport Most Harmful Event Non - Collision 21"01 - 26,000 Ibs 14,536- 11,793 kg) 77 Other, Explain in rbage /Refuse ❑ 1 Overturn /Rollover GVWRiGCWR Narrative 3 More than 26,000 bs (11,793 kg) 11 LO g 2 Fire /Explosion 4 Not Applicable 88 Unknown 3Immersion Collision with Non -Fixed Object Collision with Non -Fixed Object 29 Cable Barrier Emer enc 14] 4 Jackknife g Y 10 Pedestrian 19 Impact Attenuator /Crash Cushion 30 Concrete Traffic Barrier 5 Cargo /Equipment Loss or Shift 11 Pedalcycle 20 Bridge Overhead Structure 31 Other Traffic Barrier Vehicle Use 6 Fell Jumped From Motor Vehicle 12 Railway Vehicle (train, engine) 21 Bridge Pier or Support 32 Tree (standing) Sequence of Events 7 Thrown or ater Fallin g Object 14 Motr Vehicle in Transport 23 Bridge Rail 1st 2nd S Ran into Water CCanal /Support htt pport F, I 34 Traffic Sign 9 Other Non - Collision 15 Parked Motor Vehicle 24 Curb 35 Traffic Signal S /40 -465e uenceofEVenfsanly 16 Work Zone /Maintenance g Support q 25 Ditch 36 Other Post, Pole, or Suppo 1 No [�141 40 Equipment Failure (blown tlr Equipment 26 Embankment 37 Fence 2 Yes 3rd 4th brake failure, etc.) 17 Struck by Falling, Shifting Cargo or 27 Guardrail Face 38 Mailbox 88 Unknown 415eparation of Units Anything Set in Motion by Motor 28 Guardrail End 39 Other Fixed Object (wall, 42 Ran Off Roadway, Rig Vehicle building, tunnel, etc.) 43 Ran Off Roadway, Lett 18 Other Non -Fixed Object El 1-1 44 Cross Median 45 Cross Centerline Vehicle Maneuver Action Traffic Control Device For Vehicle Defects 46 Downhill Runawa 1 Straight Ahead 13 Stopped in Traffic This Vehicle 3TurmngLeft Roadway Grade 14 Slowing i 1 Level Roadway Alignment [1:3] 4 Backing 15 Negotiating a Curve 8 Flashing Signal 1 5 Turning Right ❑ 2 Hiilcrest 16 Leaving Traffic Lane 9 Railway Crossing 12 Suspension 3 Uphill 1 Straight 6 lanes 17 Entering Traffic Lan Device 1 None 13 Wheels Parkedng 4 Downhill �• 2 Curve Right 77 Other, Explain in 1 No Controls 10 Person (including 2 Brakes 14 Windows/ 5 Sag (bottom �^ 3 Curve Le 10 Making U -Turn Narrative 4 School Zone Sign/ Flagman, Officer, 3 Tires Windshield ❑ 11 Overtaking/ 88 Unknown Device Guard, etc.) 4 Lights (head, 15 Mirrors Passin 5 Traffic Control 13 Warnin Sign signal, tall) 16Truck Coupling/ 1 No Special Function 9 Ambulance 14 Intercity Bus Signal 77 Other, Explain in Special Function 6 Steering Trailer Hitch/ 2 Farm Vehicle 10 Fire Truck 15 Charter/Tour Bus 6 Stop Sign Narrative 7 Wipers Safety Chains of Motor Vehicle Fil 3 Police 11 Farm Labor Transport 16 Shuttle Bus 7 Yield Sign 88 Unknown 9 Exhaust System 77 Other, Explain it 7 Taxi 12 School Bus 17 Farm Labor Bus 30 Body, Doors Narrative 8 Military 13 Transit /Commuter Bus 88 Unknown 11 Power Train 88 Unknown PERSON # NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON# NAME OF VIOLATOR FLSTATUTENUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON # NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER HSMV 90010 S (VIP) (rev 10110) Page 3 of E REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER Check if Comm rci I 11m002684 81843854 7Parked in Transport - VEHICLE LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRE Check if Permanen VIN Motor Vehid 1 Registratio vehicle 335 A FL O9/2O/2011 1 OE 8Z95323 n ❑ YEAR - MAKE -MODEL STYLE COLOR DAMAGE: 1 Disabling 4 Minor EST. AMOUN a 2 Yes ZOO 4 R GRY 2 Functional 88 Unknown 1,900 88 Unknown 3 None 'INSURANCE COMPANY i INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER Towed due to Damage: VEHICLE REMOVED BY DRIVER 1 Rotation 2 Owner Request ALLSTATE INS® We 611124930621 1 No 2 Yes 3 Driver ive 4 Other Explain in Narra NAME OF VEHICLE OWNER (Check if Business)® CURRENT.ADDRESS CITY & STATE -'ZIP CODE OBIE YOUNG ] 715 PALM BEACH K EST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 TRAILERII LICENSENUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRES Checkif Permanen VIN YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES Registratiorj�j TRAILERP LICENSENUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check if Permanen VIN -` YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES Registratior� VEHICLE N S E W Off -Road Unknown ON STREET, ROAD, HIGHWAY AT EST. SPEE POSTED SPEED TOTAL LANES TRAVELING❑ [ ❑ ❑ NORTH ICE BLVD (C °R. 809A) 5 HAZ. MAT. RELEASED 1 No HAZ, MAT, PLACARD 1 No HAZ. MAT. NUMBER HAZ. MAT. CLASS Area of Initial Impact Most Damaged Area 2Yes 88 Unknown a 2Yes 88 Unknown r-� 18 8 4 6 ® 7 18 undcrcarria c 18 2 s 4 a e T 8 i 16 9a ,q a 19 Overturn 19 1 16 1® 1a a MOTOR CARRIER NAME US DOT NUMBER 20 Windshield 20 14 18 12 11 10 9 21 Trail 21 S4 iS 12 11 iQ 9 MOTOR CARRIER ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER Vehicle Body Type Trafficway Commercial Motor Vehicle Configuration 15L speed Vehicle 1 Two -Way, Not Divided : 1 Vehicle 10,000lbs or less Placarded 8 Tractor/Triple for 161Sport) Utility Vehicle 2 Two -Way, Not Divided, with a Hazardous Materials 9 Truck more than 10,000 ibs (4,53 17 Cargo Van (10 000lbs Continuous Left Turn Lane 2 Single -Unit Truck (2 -axle and GVWR kg) Cannot Classi 511 (4,536 kg) or less] ❑ more than 10,000 Ibs (4,536 kg) BusJLarge 3 Two-Way, Divided, Unprotected 10 Van seats for 9 -15 1 Passenger Car 18 Motor Coach (painted >4 feet) Median 3 Single -Unit Truck (3 or more axles) occupants, including driver) 2 Passenger Van 19 Other Light Trucks (10,000lbs 4 Two -Way, Divided, Positive Mediar 4 Truck PullingTrailer(s) 11 Bus (seats for more than 15 3 Picku (4,536 kg) or less) Barrier ST Tractor (bobtail)) occupants, including driver) 7 Motor Home 0 Medium/Heavy rucks (more tha 5 One- way Trafficway 6 Truck Tractor /Semi - Trailer 77 Other, Explain In Narrative 8 Bus 10,000 Ibs 14,536)1 88 Unknown Trailer Tye 7 Truck Tractor /Double Trailer 88 Unknown 11 Motorcycle 21 Farm Labor Vehic e 77 Other, Explain in Narrative TRAILER 1 TRAILER 2 1 Single Semi Trailer Cargo Body Type 12 Moped 8 Pole Trailer g Y Yp 88 Unknown 2 Tandem Semi Trailer 13 Container ha 13 All Terrain Vehicle (ATV) ❑ ❑ 9 Towed Vehicle 3 Van /Enclosed Box 3TankTrailer 30 Auto Transport 4Hoppper Containerthassis Comm/Non-Commercial 4 Saddle MountJTrailer 14 Vehicle Towing 77 Other, Ex Lain i 5 POW p 5 Boat Trailer Another Vehicle 1 Interstate Carrier 6 Utility Trailer Narrative 1 No Car o b Cargo Tank 15 Not Applicable 2 Intrastate Carrier y 88 Unknown g 7 Flatbed (vehicle 10,000 Ibs 3 Not in Commerce /Government 7 House Trailer 2 Bus 8 Dump 4,53b kg) or less not 4 Not in Commerce /Other Truck 110,000 Ibs 4,536kg) or less 9 Concrete Mixer displaying NM placard Comm 10 Auto Transport Most Harmful Event Non - Collision ❑ 210,001 -26, Ibs 14,536 - 11,793 kg) 77 Other, Explain in 11 Garbage /Refuse 1 Overturn /Rollover GVWR/GCWR 3 More tfian 26,000 bs (11,793 kg) 12 Log Narrative 2 Fire /Explosion 4 Not Applicable 88 Unknown 3 Immersion Collision with Non -Fixed Object Collision with Non -Fixed Object 29 Cable Barrier Emergency ] 4 4 Jackknife g Y 10 Pedestrian 19 Impact Attenuator Crash Cushion 30 Concrete Traffic Barrier S Cargo/Equipment Loss or Shift 11 Pedalc cle p Vehicle Use Yy 20 Bridge Overhead Structure 31 Other Traffic Barrier 6 FellJum Jumped From Motor Vehicle Ju Sequence of Events 7Thrown or Failingg Object 13 Animxl Vehicle (train, engine) 21 Bridge Pier or Support 32 Tree (standing) 22 Bridge Rail 33 Utility Pole /Light Support 1st 2nd 8 Ran into Waterigana� 14 Motor Vehicle in Transport 9 Other Non - Collision p 23 Culvert 34 Traffic Sign Support I:fl 15 Parked Motor Vehicle 24 Curb 35 Traffic Signal Support (40-46 Sequence of Events only 16 Work Zone /Maintenance 25 Ditch 36 Other Post, Pole, or Suppo 1 No [�141 40 Equipment Failure (blown fir Equipment 26 Embankment 37 Fence 2 Yes 17 Struck by Failing, Shifting Cargo brake failure, etc.) or 27 Guardrail Face 38 Mailbox 3rd 41S Units Anything Set in Motion by Motor 28 Guardrail End 39 Other Fixed Object (wall, 88 Unknown d 42 Ran Off Roadway, Rig Vehicle building, tunnel, etc.) 43 Ran Off Roadway, Left 18 Other Non -Fixed Object ❑ ❑ 44 Cross Median 45 Cross Centerline Vehicle Maneuver Action Traffic Control Device For Vehicle Defects 46 Downhill Runawa 1 Straight Ahead 13 Stopped in Traffic This Vehicle Roadway Grade ❑ 3 Backing Left 14Slowm C 1 Level Roadway Alignment 4 Backing IS Negotiating a Curve 8 Flashing Signal 13 5Turnin Right 16 Leaving Traffc Lane 2 g g t `� 9 Railway Crossing 12 Suspension 6 Changing Lanes uphill 1 Straight 17 Entenn Traffic Lan Device 3 U hill p g 8 Parked g 1 None 13 Wheels 4 Downhill .• 2 Curve Right 77 Other, Explain in 1 No Controls 10 Person (including 2 Brakes 14 Windows/ 10 Making U -Turn ❑ 5 Sag (bottom 3 Curve Lett Narrative 4 School Zone Sign/ Flagman, Officer, 3 Tires Windshield 11 Overtaking/ 88 Unknown Device Guard, etc.) 4 Lights (head, 15 Mirrors Passing 5 Traffic Control 13 Warnin Siggn signal, tail) 16 Truck Coupling/ 1 No Special Function 9 Ambulance 14 Intercity Bus Siggnal 77 Other, Fxplaln in Special Function 6 Steering Trailer Hitch/ of Motor Vehicle 2 Farm Vehicle 10 Fire Truck 15 Charter/Tour Bus 6 Sto Sign Narrative 7 Wipers Safety Chains 3 Police 11 Farm Labor Transport 16 Shuttle Bus 7 Yield Sign 88 Unknown 9 Exhaust System 77 Other, Explain I 7 Taxi -12 School Bus 17 Farm tabor Bus 10 Body, Doors Narrative 8 Military 13 Transit /Commuter Bus 88 Unknown 11 Power Train 88 Unknown PERSON# NAMEOFVIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON # NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON # NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER HSMV 90010 S (VIP) (rev 10110) Page 4 of 3 REPORTING AGENCY CASE UMBER H5MV CRASH REPORT NUMBER ® 11m002684 1 12Mir),n_Motorist iver VEHICLE tt NAME - -: PHONE NUMBER Check if Recommend �1 ❑ senger (561) 358m2464 Driver Re•exall - CURRENTADDRESS (Number and Street) - 'CITY & STATE ' - -.: ZIP LODE 138.2 DAKOTA JUPITER, FL 3345 DATE OFBIRTH SEX: DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER STATE EXPIRES INJURY SEVERITY (INJ) 11 - 1 None 41ncaP acitating ❑ 06/03/1983 2 Female 62000837030 FL 06/03/2019 2 Possible 5 Fatal (within 30 days) 88 Unknown 3 Non-incapacitating 6 Non - Traffic Fatality DL Type Required Endorsements Drivers Actions at Time of Crash 1A 2B 3 C 1st 26 Ran off Roadway 3rd Condition At 1 Yes 1 No Contributing ction 4 D /Chauffeur 2 No 2 Operated MV in Careless or 27 Disregarded other Traffic Time of Crash 5 E /Operator p Sign 3 No Req. Endorsement Negligent Manner ❑ 6 E /Oper - Rest 28 Disregarded Other Road 1 Apparently Normal 3 Failed 4o Yield Right -of -Way 3 Asleep or Fatigued 7 None Markings 4 Improper Backing 5 III 29 Over- Correcting /Over- (sick) or Fatigued Driver Distracted By 4 Other Inside the Vehicle 6 Improper Turn Steering 6 Seizure Epilepsy, Blackout (Explain in Narrative) 2nd 10 Followed too Closely 4th 7 Physiw)ly Impaired 30 Swerved or Avoided: Due 2 Electronic Communication !outside the vehicle, explai 12 Drove too Fast for Conditions Object, Non Motorist in angry disturbed, etc.) 51 1 Not Distracted 5 External Distraction ❑ 11 Ran Red Light to Wind, Sli per Surface, My 8 Emotional (depression, Devices (cell phone etc.) in narrative) 13 Ran Stop Sign 9 Under the Influence of Roadway, 3 Other Electronic 6evice 6 Texting 15 Improper Passing 31 Operated MV in Erratic, Medications /Drugs /Alcohol {navigation device, DVD player) 7 Inattentive 17 Exceeded Posted Speed 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Reckless or Aggressive Manner Driver Vison Obstructions 88 Unknown 21 Wrong Side of Wrong Way 77 Other Contributing Factor 88 Unknown 25 Failed to Keep in Proper Lane 1 Vision Not Obscured 5 Load on Vehicle 9 Smoke 2Inclement Weather 6 Building�Fixed Object 10 Glare o ' o ' 3 Parked /Stoppped Vehicle 7 Signs /BI (boards 77 All Other, Explain Helmet Use (HU) Eye Protection (EP) 4 Trees /Crops7Bushes 8 Fog in Narrative Restraint Systems 1 DOT-Compliant motorcycle elm 1 Yes F31 (RS) '' e• Mo[ortycteHelme 2 N 2 Other Helmet ,3 3 Not Applicable Motor Vehicle Seating Position: LOCATION: SEAT ROW OTHER 3 No Helmet 1 NotApplicabie Seat Row Other LOC 2 None Used -Motor Vehicle Occupant ( ) ® ® ® Air Bag Deployed 5 Deployed -Other 3 Shoulder and Lap Belt Used p 1 Left 1 Front 1 Not Applicabl (Agp) {knee, au bete, etc. 4 Shoulder Belt Only Used 2 Middle 2 Second 2 Sleeper Section o Truc Ca 5 Lap Belt Only Used Ejection EJECT 6 Deployed - j ( ) 3 Other 3 Third 3 Other Enclose Cargo Area - 1 Not Applicable Combination 6 Restraint Used - Type Unknown 77 Other 4 Fourth 4 Unenclosed Cargo Area 1 Not Ejected ❑ 2 Not Deployed 7 Deployed-Curtail 7 Child Restraint System - Forward Facin in 77 Other Row 5 Trailing Unit 2 Ejected 8 Child Restraint System Rear Facing (explain -Totally 3 3 Deployed -Front 88 Deployment - 9 Booster ❑ narrative) 88 Unknown 6 Riding on Motor Vehicle Exterior (non - j 3 E ected - Partia I 4 Deployed -Side Unknown Seat Child 88 Unknown trailing unit) 4 tot Applicable 10 Restraint -Type Unknown 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 77 Other, Explain in Narrative �'�EEENNEERAOTORIST 77777777 Non - Motorist Description Non - Motorist Location At Time of Crash Action Prior to Crash 1 Pedestrian 1 Intersection - Marked Crosswalk 8 Sidewalk 5 Walking /Cycling on Sidewalk 2 Other Pedestrian (wheelchair, person In a 2 Intersection - Unmarked Crosswalk 9 Median /Crossing Island 5 In Roadwa Other (working building, skater, pedestrian conveyance, etc. 3 Intersection - other 10 Driveway Access y "" 3 Bicyclist 4 Midblock - Marked Crosswalk 11 Shared -Use Path or Trail Playing, etc.) 7 Adjacent to Roadwa (e•g•, 4 Other Cyclist 5 Travel Lane -Other Location 12 Non - Trafficway Area 1 Crossing Roadway Y 6 Bicycle Lane 77 Other, Explain in Narrativ 2 Waiting to Cross Roadway shoulder, median) 5 Occupant of Motor Vehicle Not in Transpo (Parked, etc. 7 Shoulder /Roadside 88 Unknown 3 Walking/Cycling Along Going to or from School (K -1 J 6 Occupant of a Non -Motor Vehicle Roadwa wih Traffic (in or 9 Working in Trafficway Transportation Device Non- Motorist Actions /Circumstances adjacent to travel lane) incident response) 7 Unknown Type of Non - Motorist 1 No Improper Action 4 Walking /Cycling Along 0 None 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 2 Dart /Dash ash Roadway o travel lane) (m or 88 Unknown Safety Equipment 1sH 3Failureto Yield Right -of -Way adjacent to travel lane) 1 None 5 Lighting 4 Failure to Obey Traffic Signs, 2 Helmet 6 Not Appllcable Signals, or Officer 7 Entering /Exiting Parked /Standing 10 Improper Turn /Merge 3 Protective Pads Used 77 Other, Explai ❑ 5 In Roadway Improperly (standing, Vehicle 11 Improper Passing (elbows, knees, shins, etc.) in Narrative 2nd lying, working�piaying) 8 Inattentive (talking, eating, etc.) 12 Wrong -Way Riding or Walking 6 Disabled Ve Icle Related (working 9 Not Visible (dark Clothing, no 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 4 Reflective Clothing (jacket, 88 Unknown backpack, etc.) on, pushing, leaving /approaching) lighting, etc.) 88 Unknown • SUSPECTED ALCOHOLTESTED: ALCOHOLTEST TYPE ALCOHOL BAC SUSPECTED DRUG TESTED: DRUG TEST TYPE: DRUG TEST RESULT: ALCOHOL USE: 1 Test Not Given 1 Blood TEST RESULT DRUG USE: 1 Test Not Glveirr'(((���� S Blood 1 Positive 1 No 2 Test Refused 2 Breath ❑ 1 Pending 1 No 2 Test Refused 3 Urine ❑ 2 Negative 2 Yes 1 3 Test Given 3 Urine 2- 11��11 2 Yes 3 Test Given 77 Other, 3 Pending ❑ 88 Unknown 88 Unknown, if Teste 77 Other, Explain in 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 88 Unknown, if Tested Explain in Narrativc 88 Unknown Narrative SOURCE OF TRANSPORTTO MEDICAL FACILIT EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement PSG FR 3729 GARDENS MEDICAL CENTER 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown ADDITIONAL PERSON VEHICLE 'NAME' DATE OFBIRTH [NJ SEX LOC:S R 0 EJE HU EP ABD RS 3 JERRY 0. DUNN 10/15/1983 2 1 3 1 1 1 3 3 1 3 .111 CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE '. ZIP CODE 12669 77TH PL N ROYAi. PALM BCHf FL 33412 SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILI� EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTEDTO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement PALM BCH GDNS FR 3729 COLUMBIA HOSPITAL 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown PERSON VEHICLE NAME -.DATE OF BIRTH EJEJ HU I EP I ABD RS CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE ZIP CODE SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILI� EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported t] 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown 90010 S (VIP) (rev 10/10) Page 5 of 9 REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER PERSON 11=002684 81843854 1 Driver VENICLEfi NAME PHONE NUMBER Check if �j 2Non- Motorist 3 Passenger a�l WILLIAMS 561)436-$118 DrverRe -es CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE ' -. ZIP CODE 12669 77TH PL WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33412 :DATE OF BIRTH SEX: .DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER STATE EXPIRES INJURY SEVERITY (JNJ) 1 I - 1 None 4 Incapacitating ® 10/03/1968 2 Female -45"2- 72$ -.S -363 -0 FL 10/03/2017 2 Possible 5 Fatal (within 30 days) 88 Unknown 3 Non - Incapacitating 6 Non - Traffic Fatality e• DL Type Required Endorsements Drivers Actions at Time of Crash 1A 2B 3C 1st 26 Ran off Roadway 3rd Condition At 1 Yes 1 No Contributing ction 4 D /Chauffeur 2 No ❑ 2 Operated MV in Careless or S7 Disregarded other Traffic Time of Crash 5 E /Operator 3 No Req. Endorsement Negligent Manner 1 Apparentl NDrmal 28 Disre aided Other Road 6E /i -ftest g 3 Failed to Yield Right -of -Way Markings 3 Asleepp or ati$ued 7 None 4 Improper Backing 29 Over - Correcting /Over- 5 ill (sick) or Fatigued Driver Distracted By 4 Other Inside the Vehicle 6 Improper Turn Steering 6 Seizure Epilepsy, Blackout (Explain in Narrative) 2nd SO Followed too Closely 4th 7 Physically Impaired 30 Swerved or Avoided: DueU 1 Not Distracted $ External Distraction ❑ 11 Ran Red Light to Wind, Slippery Surface, M 8 Emotional (depression, 2 Electronic Communication (outside the vehicle, explai 12 Drove too Fast for Conditions Object, Non - Motorist in angry disturbed, etc.) Devices (cell phone, etc.) In narrative) 13 Ran Stop Sign 9 Under the Influence of 3 Other Electronic Device Roadway, etc. 6 Texting 15 Improper Passing 31 O erated MV in Erratic, Medications /Drugs /Alcohol (navigation device, DVD player) 7 inattentive 17 Exceeded posted Speed 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Reckless or Aggressive Manner Driver Vison Obstructions 88 Unknown 21 Wrong Side of Wrong Way 77 Other Contributing Factor 88 Unknown 25 Failed 4o Keep in Proper Lane 1 Vision Not Obscured 5 Load on Vehicle 9 Smoke 2 Inclement Weather 6 Building Fixed Object 10 Glare ®' ®' ' 1 3 Parked/Stopped Vehicle 7 Signs /Billboards 77 All Other, Explain Helmet Use (H U) Eye Protection (EP) 8 Fog in Narrative Restraint Systems 4 Trees /Crops /Bushes 1 DOT- Compiie 1 Yes (RS) r e Motorcycle Helme 2 No 20ther Helmet 3Not Applicable Motor Vehicle Seating Position: LOCATION: SEAT ROW OTHER 3N Helmet 1 Not Applicable Seat Row Other (LOC) 2 None Used - Motor Vehicle Occupant Air Bag Deployed 5 Deployed -other 3 Shoulder and Lap Belt Used ® i ® 1 Left 1 Front 1 NotApplicabl 4 knee, au belt, etc. 4 Shoulder Belt Only Used ( ) 2 Middle 2 Second 2 Sleeper Section o Truck Ca Ejection (EJECT) Deployed- 5 Lap Belt Only Used 3 Right 3 Third 3 Other Enclose Car o Area 6 Restraint Used -Type Unknown g g 1 Not Applicable Combination 77 Other 4 Fourth 4 Unenclosed Cargo Area 1 Not Ejected ❑ 2 Not Deployed 7 Deployed- CUrtai 7 Child Restraint System - Forward Facin (explain in 77 Other Row 5 Trailing Unit 2 Ejected - Totallyy 1 3 Deployed -Front 88 Deployment 8 Child Restraint System - Rear Facing narrative) 88 Unknown 6 Riding on Motor Vehicle Exterior (non - 1 3 Elected - Partial) 4 Deployed Side Unknown 9 Booster Seat Child 88 Unknown trailing unit) 4 I1otApplicable 10 Restraint -Type Unknown 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 77 Other, Explain in Narrative NON-MOTORIST Non - Motorist Description Non - Motorist Location At Tlme of Crash Action Prior to Crash 1 Pedestrian 1 Intersection - Marked Crosswalk 8 Sidewalk 5 Walking /Cycling on Sidewalk 2 Other Pedestrian (wheelchair, person in a 2 Intersection - Unmarked Crosswalk 9 Median /Crossing island 61n lkl way Other Sidewalk 3 Intersection -Other 10 Driveway Access building skater, pedestrian conveyance, etc. ) 3 Bicyclist ❑ 4 Midblock - Marked Crosswalk 11 Shared-Use Path or Trail p{aging, etc) 7 Adjacent Roadway (e.g., 4 Other Cyclist 5 Travel Lane - Other Location 12 Non- Trafficway Area 1 Crossing Roadway shoulder, median) a 5 Occupant of Motor Vehicle Not in Transpo 6 Bicycle Lane 77 Other, Explain in Narrativ 2 Waiting to Cross Roadway (parked, etc.) 7 Shoulder /Roadside 88 Unknown 3 Walking /Cycling Along 8 Going to or from School (K -1 6 Occupant of a Non -Motor Vehicle Roadway with Traffic (in or 9 Working in Trafficway Non - Motorist Actions /Clrcumstances (incident response ) Device adjacent to travel lane) Transportation 30 None 7 Unknown Type of Non- Motorist 1 No Improper Action 4 Walking /Cycling Along 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 2 Dart/Dash Roadway Against Traffic (in or 88 Unknown Safety Equipment 1st ❑ 3 Failure to Yield Right-of-Way adjacent to travel lane) 1 None 5 Lighting 4 Failure to Obey Traffic Signs, 2 Helmet 6 Not Applicable Signals, or Officer 7 Entering /Exiting Parked /Standing 10 Improper Turn Merge In Roadway Improperly (standing, Vehicle 11 Improper Passing (elbows, knees, shins, etc.) in Narrative 2nd lying, working, �'ayinl,) 8Inattentive (talking, eating, etc.) 12 Wrong -Way Riding or Walking 3 Protective Pads Used 77 Other, ExpralrLJ 5 88 Unknown 6 Disabled Vehicle Re ated (working 9 Not Visible (dark clothing, no 77 Other, Explain In Narrative 4 Reflective Clothing Qacket, on, pushing, leaving /approaching) lighting, etc.) 88 Unknown backpack, etc.) ALCOHOL/DRUG/EMS SUSPECTED ALCOHOL TESTED: ALCOHOLTESTTYPE ALCOHOL BA C SUSPECTED DRUG TESTED: ORUGT EST TYPE: DRUGTESTRESULT: (� DRUG USE: ❑ 1 Test Not Giver 1 Blood ❑ 1 Negaivee ❑ ALCOHOL USE: i Test Not Given 1 Brood TEST ding 1 No 2 Test Refused 2 Breath 1 Pending 1 1 2 Test Refused 3 Urine 2 Negative I..�1 Ye 2 Yes 3 Test Given 3 Urine 2 Com leted 2 Yes 3 Test Given 77 Other, 3 Pending ❑ 88 Unknown 88 Unknown, if Tested 77 Other, Exp ain in 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 88 Unknown, if 7este Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown Narrative SOURCE OFTRANSPORTTO MEDICAL FACILF� EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTEDTO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement PALM BCH GDNS FR 3729 COLUMBIA HOSPITAL 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown ®s PERSON 'VEHICLE NAME -. 'DATE OF BIRTH - INJ SEX LOC S R O —[-77W1 EP ABD RS CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) 'CITY & STATE ` -- ZIP CODE SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILFTn EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain In Narrative 88 Unknown PERSON I VEHICLE rME - DATE OF BIRTH INJ I SEX I LOC:S RIO EJf HU EP ABD R5 CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE , 21P CODE SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILITr EMS AGENCY NAME ORID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown HSMV 90010 S (VIP) (rev 10/10) Page 6 of 9 REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER -: HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER ® 11m002684 1 43 1 Driver VEHICLE III NAME - PHONE NUMBER Check if 2 Non - Motorist 1 1 Recommend n ❑ 3 Passenger SAV (561) 356 ®157® Driver Re -exart CURRENT ADDRESS (Numberand Street) - CITY . &STATE - - ZIP CODE -' 715 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD EST PALM, _,, L 33401 DATE OF 01 SEX: DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER STATE EXPIRES INJURY SEVERITY (INJ) i Male 1 None 4 Incapacitating ® 04/09/P9139 2 Female Y5 07878962 iFL o4 /os /aoz9 2 Possible 5 Fatal (within 30 days) 88 Unknown 3 Non-incapacitating 6 Non - Traffic Fatality DL Type Required Endorsements Drivers Actions at Time of Crash 1A 28 3C 1st 26 Ran off Roadway 3rd Condition At 1 Yes 1 No ContrlbutIn Action 4 D /Chauffeur 2 No 2 O erated MV in Careless or 27 Disregarded other Traffic Time of Crash 5 E /Operator p. Sign i 3 No Req. Endorsement Negligent Manner 1 Apparent) Normal 1 28 Oare aided Other Road 6 E /Oper - Res g 3 Failed to Yield Right -of -Way Markings 3 Asleep or atigued 7 None 4 Improper Backing Z9 Over - Correcting /Over- 5 III (sick) or Fatigued Driver Distracted By 4 Other Inside the Vehicle 6 Improper Turn Steering 6 Seizure, Epilepsy, Blackout 2nd ((Explain in Narrative) 10 Followed too Closely 30 Swerved or Avoided: Due 4th 4th II1I 7 Physically Impaired 1 Not ionic Co (External Distraction ❑ 11 Ran Red Light to Wind, Slippery Surface, M 8 Emotional (depression, 2 Electronic Communication {outside the vehicle, explai 12 Drove too Fast for Conditions Object, Non - Motorist in angry disturbed, etc.) Devices (cell phone, etc.) in narrative) 13 Ran Stop Sign Roadway, 9 nrler the Influence of '°—� 3 Other Electronic Device 6Texting 15 Improper Passing 31 OperatedtMV In Erratic, Medications /Drugs /Alcohol (navigation device, DVD player) 7 Inattentive 17 Exceeded Posted Speed Reckless or Aggressive Manner 77 Other, Explain In Narrative Driver Vison Obstructions 88 Unknown 21 Wrong Side of Wrong Way 77 Other Contributing Factor 88 Unknown 25 Failed to Keep in Proper Lane 1 Vision Not Obscured 5 Load on Vehicle 9 Smoke 2 Inclement Weather 6 Building Fixed Object 10 Glare FIL 7 Signs Iboards 77 All Other, Explain 3 Parked /Stopped Vehicle /Bi Helmet Use (HU) Eye Protection (EP) 4Trees /Crops /Bushes 8 Fog in Narrative Restraint Systems 1 DOT - Compliant 1 Yes Motorcycle Helme 2 No (RS) F3] 3] 2 Ocher Helmet 3 Not Applicabl Motor Vehicle Seating Position: LOCATION: SEAT ROW OTHER 3 No Helmet 1 NotApPlivable Seat Row Other (Loc) ❑ ❑ 2 None Used -Motor Vehicle Occupant 1 $ Air Bag Deployed 3 Shoulder and Lap Belt Used 5 Deployed-Other 4 Shoulder Belt Only Used 1 Left 1 Front 1 Not Applicable! ( ABD) (knee, a r belt, etc. 2 Middle 2 Second 2 Sleeper Section o Truck Cab E eCtiOn EJECT 6 De ed- 5 Lap Belt Only Used (EJECT) 3 Right 3 Third 3 Other Enclose Cargo Area 1 Not Applicable Combination 6 Restraint Used - Type Unknown 77 Other 4 Fourth 4 Unenclosed Cargo Area 1 Not Ejected 2 Not Deployed 7 Deployed- Curtai 7 Child Restraint System - Forward Facin (explain in 77 Other Row 5 Trailing Unit 2 Elected - Totally 3 Deployed - front 88 Deployment 8 Child Restraint System -Rear facing 9 Booster Seat narrative) 88 Unknown 6 Riding on Motor Vehicle Exterior (non- 3 Elected - Partial) 4 Deployed -Side Unknown 88 Unknown trailing unit) 4 Not Applicable 10 Child Restraint -Type Unknown 77 Other, Explain in 88 Unknown 88 Unknown Narrative o s e• Non- Motorist Description Non - Motorist Location At Time of Crash Action Prior to Crash 1 Pedestrian l Intersection - Marked Crosswalk 8 Sidewalk 5 Walking /Cycling on Sidewalk 2 Other Pedestrian (wheelchair, person in a 2 Intersection - Unmarked Crosswalk 9 Median /Crossing Island 5 in Roadwa Other Sidewalk building, skater, pedestrian conveyance, etc. 3 Intersection - Other 10 Driveway Access y- 3 Bicyclist 4 Midblock - Marked Crosswalk 11 Shared -Use Path or Trait laying, etc.) Adjacent to Roadway (e.g., ❑ 4 Other Cyclist 5 Travel Lane - Other Location 12 Non- Trafftcway Area i Crossing Roadway Y shoulder, median) 6 Bicycle Lane 77 Other, Explain in Narrativ 2 Waiting to Cross Roadway 5 Occupant of Motor Vehicle Not in Transpo g Going to or from School (K -1 ) (parked, etc.) 7 Shoulder /Roadside 88 Unknown 3 Walking /Cycling Along 6 Occupant of a Non -Motor Vehicle Roadway with Traffic (in or 9 Working in Trafficway Non - Motorist Actions /Circumstances Incident response) Transportation Device adjacent to travel lane) p ) 0 Non 0 None 7 Unknown Type of Non - Motorist 1 No Improper Action 4 Walking/Cycling Along 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 2 Dart/Dash Roadway Against Traffic (in or Safety Equipment let ❑ 3 Failure to Yield Right -of -Way adjacent to travel lane) 88 Unknown 1 None 5 Lighting 4 Failure to Obey Traffic Signs, 2 Helmet 6 Not Applicable Sirals, or Officer 7 Entering /Exiting Parked /Standing 10 Improper Turn /Merge 3 Protective Pads Used 77 Other Explai 5 n Roadway Improperly (standing, Vehicle 11 Improper Passing Iying,working playing) 8Inattentive talking,eatin etc. (elbows, knees, shins, etc.) in Narrative 2nd 6 Disabled Vehicle Related (working 9 Not Visible dark clothing, no ) 77 Other, Explain an Narrativeking 4 Reflective Clothing (jacket, 88 Unknown on, pushing, leaving /approaching) lighting, etc.) 88 Unknown backpack, etc.) • D• SUSPECTED ALCOHOL TESTED: ALCOHOLT£STTYPE ALCOHOL BAC SUSPECTED DRUG TESTED: DRUGTESTTYPE: DRUG TESTRE5ULT: Ueste Given ed 77JOther, U tknown, 8 8Unknow❑ 8 UO Unknown 88 Unknown, Tested 77 Exp ain in 88 U kn iS 88 Unknown❑ 88 If Explain in Narrative Narrative SOURCE OF TRANSPORTTO MEDICAL FACILI EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported Til 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown et e + - PERSON VEHICLE1 NAME - - - . DATE OF.BIRTH, INJ SEX LOGS R 0 HE HU EP ABD RS CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) <' CITY & STATE "ZIP CODE SOURCE OF TRANSPORTTO MEDICAL FACILrrn EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown PERSON I VEHICLE -NAME DATE OF BIRTH . INJ I SEX LOC:S R O 1 EJEJ HU I EP I ABD I RS CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE ZIP CODE SOURCE OF TRANSPORTTO MEDICAL FAOLITtj EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown HSMV 90010 S (V /P) (rev 10/10) Page 7 of 9 *END PERSON VEHICLE .NAME DATE OFBIRTH - ]NJ SEX LOC:S R O FIE HU I EP ABD RS CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) "CITY & STATE : `ZIP CODE SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILITj' —j EMSAGENCYNAMEORID EMS RUN NUMBER MEWCAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement :PERSON. VEHICLE NAME DATE OF BIRTH IN! SEX LOC:5 R O EJEI HU I EP I ABD I RS CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE ZIP CODE ' SOURCE OFTRANSPORTTO MEDICAL FACILI EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported Iu'I 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown PERSON H NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON# NAME OF VIOLATOR FLSTATUTE NUMBER CHARGE I CITATION NUMBER HSMV 90010 S (N/D) (rev 10/10) A ------------------------ - - - - -- 1;'.�'� ._ LONG FORM SHORT FORM FX UPDATE (Shaded Areas) rIME ON SCENE 5 :23 PM 5:23 PM u I F T;T, • pT#W e u.cHnry xxrve I LneILn it 6m42 PM COMPLETED❑ c 1 \ • ' TOTAL # OF • PERSON • Q�7�wZ i=ii► ran 5 :23 PM I 5:25 PM Notified By 1 Motorist 2 Law Enforcement ... __. ....___ .. _ _ .. 10 ... , ..._....... _..---.._. ..... _...__...._. ._, ..._.. _... ... TT DRIVE .3 ❑ ❑ ❑ IA Road System Identifier 7 Forest Road Type of Shoulder Type of Intersection 1 Interstate 4 County 8 Private Roadway 1 Paved 1 Not at Intersection 5 Traffic Circle 2 U.S. 5 Local 9 Parking Lot 1:1 2 Unpaved ❑ 2 Four -Way Intersection 6 Roundabout 3 State 6 Turnpike /Toll 77 Other, Explain in 3 Curb 3 T- Intersection 7Five- Point, or More Narrative 4 Y- Intersection 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Light Condition Weather Condition Roadway Surface Condition School Bus Related Manner of Collision /Impact 1 Daylight 5 Dark -Not Lighted ❑ 4 Fog, Smog Smoke [�2] 5 Oil ❑ 1 Ye No 2 Dusk 6Dark- Unknown 5 Sleet /Hail 6 Mud, Dirt, Gravel 2 Yes, School Bus 4 Sideswipe, same direction 3 Dawn Lighting Freezing Rain 7 Sand Directly Involved 5 Sideswipe, Opposite Directio 4 Dark - Lighted 77 Other, Explain in 6 Blowing Sand, Soil, 8 Water (standing/ 3 Yes, School Bus 6 Rear to Side Narrative Dirt moving) Indirectly Involve 7 Rear to Rear 1 Clear 1 Dry 1 Front to Rear 88 Unknown 2 Cloudy 7 Severe Crosswinds 2 Wet 77 Other, Explain 2 Front to Front 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 77 Other, Explain in in Narrative 88 Unknown 3 Rain Narrative 41ce /Frost gg Unknown 3 Angle First Harmful Event Non - Collision Collision Non -Fixed Object Collision with Fixed Object First Harmful Event ❑ 1 Overturn /Rollover 10 Pedestrian 19 Impact Attenuator /Crash 30 Concrete Traffic Barrier Location 2 Fire /Explosion 11 Pedalcycle Cushion 31 Other Traffic Barrier 1 On Roadway 2 3 Immersion 12 Railway Vehicle (train, 20 Bridge Overhead Structure 32 Tree (standing) ❑ 2 Off Roadway 4 Jackknife engine) 21 Bridge Pier or Support 33 Utility Pole /Light Support 3 Shoulder 5 Cargo /E uipment 13 Animal 22 Bridge Rail 34 Traffic Sign Support 4 Median First Harmful Event Loss or Shift 14 Motor Vehicle in Transport 23 Culvert 35 Traffic Signal Support 6 Gore within Interchange 6 Fell /Jumped From 15 Parked Motor Vehicle 24 Curb 36 Other Post, Pole or Support 7 Separator Motor Vehicle 16 Work Zone /Maintenance 25 Ditch 37 Fence 8 In Parking Lane or Zone 1 No 7 Thrown or Falling Equipment 26 Embankment 38 Mailbox 9 Outside Right -of -way 2 Yes Object 17 Struck by Failling, Shifting 27 Guardrail Face 39 Other Fixed Object (wall, 10 Roadside 88 Unknown 8 Ran mto Water /Canal Cargo 28 Guardrail End building, tunnel, etc.) 88 Unknown 9 Other Non - Collision 18 Other Non -Fixed Object 29 Cable Barrier First Harmful Event Relation to Junction 5 Railway Grade Crossing 14 Entrance /Exit Ramp 15 Crossover- Related 1 Non - Junction 16 Shared -Use Path or Trail 2 Intersection 17 Acceleration /Deceleration Lane 3Intersection- Related 18 Through Roadway 4 Driveway /Alley Access 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Related 88 Unknown Contributing Circumstances: Road ❑ 9 Worn, Travel- Polished Surface 10 Road Surface Condition (wet, icy, snow, slush, etc.) 11 Obstruction in Roadway 12 Debris 1 None 13 Traffic Control Device 4 Work Zone (construction/ Inoperative, Missing or Obscured maintenance /utility) 14 Non - Highway Work 6 Shoulders (none, low, soft, high) 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 7 Rut, Holes, Bumps 88 Unknown Contributing Circumstances: Environment F] 1-1 F-1 1 None 5 Animal(s) in Roadway 2 Weather Conditions 77 Other, Explain in 3 Physical Obstruction(s) Narrative 4 Glare 88 Unknown Work Zone Related Crash in Work Zone Type of Work Zone Workers in Work Zone Law Enforcement in 1 No 1 Before the First Work Zone 1 Lane Closure 1 No Work Zone 2 Yes ❑ Warning Sign ❑ 2 Lane Shift /Crossover ❑ 2 Yes ❑ i No 88 Unknown 2 Advance Warning Area 3 Work on Shoulder or Median 88 Unknown 2 Officer Present 3 Transition Area 4 Intermittent or Moving Wor 3 Law Enforcement Vehicle 4 Activity Area 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Only Present 5 Termination Area • II NAME ADDRESS 17852 70Th! ST N ADDRESS DAMAGE -OTHER THAN VEHICLE) EST. AMOUNTI OWNER'S NAME ❑ (Check if Business) ADDRESS PROPERTY DAMAGE -OTHER THAN EST. NAME (Check if Business) ADDRESS HSMV 90010 S (E) (rev 10/10) Page .1 of ZIP CODE FL 3347® ZIP CODE CITY & STATE ZIP CODE REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER 11a 004577 81843988 VEHICLE LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRE Check if Permanen VIN 1 Vehicle in Transport ehid� HI 1 FL 12/31/2 11 Registration❑ Fi 125 4 335 l 3 Working Vehicle 3 Working Vehicle Hit and Run 1 No YEAR MAKE MODEL STYLE COLOR DAMAGE: 1 Disabling 4 Minor EST. AMOUNT 2 Yes 2 1 L 2 Functional 88 Unknown o 1 0 88 Unknown 3 None INSURANCE COMPANY INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER Towed due VEHICLE REMOVED BY ion to Damage: r Request F4Other, EI INDEMNITY . 4165291988 1 No 2 Yes r ive Ex lain in Narra NAME OF VEHICLE OWNER (Check if Business)® CURRENT ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE DONNA Wo MACPHERSON 13218 44TH L N ROYAL PALM BCH, FL 33411 TRAILERP LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check if Permanen VIN YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES Registration) ] TRAILERP LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check if Permanen VIN YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES Registration[] IL —ONJI VEHICLE N S E W Off -Road Unknown STREET, ROAD, HIGHWAY AT EST. SPEE POSTED SPEED TOTAL LANES TRAVELING❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ HAZ. MAT. RELEASED HAZ. MAT. PLACARD HAZ. MAT. NUMBER HAZ. MAT. CLASS Area of Initial Impact Most Damaged Area 1 No 1 No 2 Yes 2 Yes 2 a e a 4 B u 8 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 18 undercarriage 18 MOTOR CARRIER NAME US DOT NUMBER q q� q� y, 19 Overturn 19 t 76 ,® 17 20 Windshield 20 ® 21 Tr lag 12 11 i6 MOTOR CARRIER ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER Vehicle Body Type ❑ Trafficway Commercial Motor Vehicle Configuration 15 LOWS Vehicle 1 Two -Way, Not Divided 1 Vehicle 10,000 Ibs or less Placarded 8 Tractor/Triple for 16 (Sport) Utility Vehicle 2 Two -Way, Not Divided, with a Hazardous Materials 9 Truck more than 10,000lbs (4,53 17 Cargo Van (10 000lbs Continuous Left Turn Lane 2 Single -Unit Truck (2 -axle and GVWR kg), Cannot Classify (4,536 or lessf more than 10,000 Ibs (4,536 kg) g) 3 Two -Way, Divided, Unprotected 10 Bus /Large Van (seats for 9 -15 1 Passenger Car 18 Motor Coach (painted >4 feet) Median 3 Single -Unit Truck (3 or more axles) occupants, including driver) 2 Passenger Van 19 Other Light Trucks (10,000 lbs 4 Two -Way, Divided, Positive Media 4 Truck Pulling Trailer(s 11 Bus (seats for more than 15 3 Pickup (4,536 kg) or less) Barrier 5 Truck Tractor (bobtail occupants, including driver) 7 Motor Home 20 Medium /Heavy Trucks (more tha 5 One Trafficway 6 Truck Tractor /Semi - Trailer 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 8 Bus 10,000lbs (4,536 kg)) 88 Unknown Trailer T pe 7 Truck Tractor /Double Trailer 88 Unknown 11 Motorcycle 21 Farm Labor Vehicle 77 Other, Explain in Narrative TRAILER 1 TRAILER 2 1 Single Semi Trailer g pole Trailer Cargo Body Type 12 Moped 88 Unknown 2 Tandem Semi Trailer 13 Intermodal 13 All Terrain Vehicle (ATV) 3 TankTrailer 9 Towed Vehicle 3 Van /Enclosed Box Container Chassis 10 Auto Transport 4Hopper Comm /Non- Commercial 4 Saddle Mount /Trailer 14 Vehicle Towing 77 Other, Explain i SPole- Trailer Another Vehicle 5 Boat Trailer 1 Interstate Carrier Narrative 6 Cargo Tank 15 Not A licable 2 Intrastate Carrier 6 Utility Trailer gg Unknown 1 No Cargo 7 Flatbed PD 7 House Trailer 2 Bus (vehicle 1 000 Ibs 3 Not in Commerce /Government 8 Dump (4,536 kg) or less not 4 Not in Commerce /Other Truck i 10,0001bs (4,536kg) or less 9 Concrete Mixer displaying NM placard Most Harmful Event Non - Collision Comm ❑ 210 ,001 - 26,000 Ibs (4,536- 11,793 kg) 10 Auto Transport 77 Other, Explain in 11 Garbage /Refuse 1 Overturn /Rollover GVWR/GCWR 3 More than 26,000 Ibs (11,793 kg) Narrative 12 Log 4 Not Applicable 88 Unknown 2 Fire /Explosion 3 Immersion Collision with Non -Fixed Object Collision with Non -Fixed Object 29 Cable Barrier Emergency 4 Jackknife g y 10 Pedestrian 5 Car o /Equi ment Loss or Shift 19 Impact Attenuator /Crash Cushion 30 Concrete Traffic Barrier p 11 Pedalcycle 20 Bridge Overhead Structure 31 Other Traffic Barrier Vehicle Use 6 Fell Jumped From Motor Vehicle 12 Railway Vehicle (train, engine) 21 Bridge Pier or Support 32 Tree (standing) Sequence of Events 7 Thrown or Falling Object 13 Animal 8 Ran into Water /Canal 22 Bridge Rail 33 Utility Pole /Light Support 14 Motor Vehicle in Transport 23 Culvert 34 Traffic Si n Support 9 Other Non - Collision 15 Parked Motor Vehicle g pp 24 Curb 35 Traffic Signal Support F1 [40 -46 Sequence of Events only 16 Work Zone /Maintenance 25 Ditch 36 Other Post, Pole, or Suppo 1 No H H 40 Equipment Failure (blown tir Equipment 26 Embankment 37 Fence 2 Yes brake failure, etc.) 17 Struck by Falling, Shifting Cargo or 27 Guardrail Face 38 Mailbox 88 Unknown 3rd 4th 41 Separation Units Anything Set in Motion by Motor 28 Guardrail End 39 Other Fixed Object (wall, d 42 Ran Off Roadway, Rig Vehicle building, tunnel, etc.) 43 Ran Off Roadway, Lett 18 Other Non -Fixed Object L-1 ❑ 44 Cross Median 45 Cross Centerline Vehicle Maneuver Action Traffic Control Device For Vehicle Defects ❑ 46 Downhill Runaway 1 Straight Ahead 13 Stopped in Traffic This Vehicle 3 Left Turning E Roadway Grade ❑ 14 Slowing 1 Level Roadway Alignment 4 Backing 15 Negotiating a Curve 8 Flashing Signal 2 Hillcrest 5 Turning Right 16 Leaving Traffic Lane 9 Railway Crossing 12 Suspension 6 Changing Lanes 3 Uphill 1 Straight 17 Enterin Traffic Lan Device P g 8 Parked g 1 None 13 Wheels 4 Downhill 2 Curve Right 77 Other, Explain in 1 No Controls 10 Person (including 2 Brakes 14 Windows/ 10 Making U -Turn ❑ 5 Sag (bottom 3 Curve Left Narrative 4 School Zone Sign/ Flagman, Officer, 3 Tires Windshield 11 Overt aking/ 88 Unknown Device Guard, etc.) 4 Lights (head, 15 Mirrors Passing 5 Traffic Control 13 Warning Sign signal, tail) 16 Truck Coupling/ Special Function 1 No Special Function 9 Ambulance 14 Intercity Bus Signal 77 Other, Explain in 6 Steering Trailer Hitch/ of Motor Vehicle 2 Farm Vehicle 10 Fire Truck 15 Charter /Tour Bus 6 Stop Sign Narrative 7 Wipers Safety Chains 3 Police 11 Farm Labor Transport 16 Shuttle Bus 88 Unknown 7 Yield Sign 9 Exhaust System 77 Other, Explain 7 Taxi 12 School Bus 17 Farm Labor Bus 10 Body, Doors Narrative 8 Military 13 Transit /Commuter Bus 88 Unknown 11 Power Train 88 Unknown PERSON # NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON It NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON # NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER HSMV 90010 S (V /P) (rev 10/10) Page 2 of -7777777777- 77777777777777 Al REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER ® 11=004577 81843988 1 Driver VEHICLE# NAME PHONE NUMBER Check if 3 Pass Motorist (561) 793 -8328 Dr ver,m exam❑ 3 Passenger CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE ZIP CODE 13218 44TH PL N ROYAL , FL 33411 DATE OF BIRTH SEX: DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER STATE EXPIRES INJURY SEVERITY (INJ) 1 Male 1 None 4 Incapacitating 06/23/1949 2 Female 21g 42� FL 06/23/2017 2 Possible 5 Fatal (within 30 days) ❑ 88 Unknown 3 Non - incapacitating 6 Non-Traffic Fatality DL Type Required Endorsements Drivers Actions at Time of Crash 1A 2B 3C 1st 26 Ran off Roadway 3rd Condition At 1 Yes 1 No Contributing Action 4 D /Chauffeur g 27 Disregarded other Traffic Time of Crash 2 No ❑ 2 F erated MV in Careless or S E /Operator 3 No Req. Endorsement Negligent Manner Sign l Apparently 6 E /Oper -Rest 28 Disregarded Other Road sleep or F Normal 7 None 3 Failed to Yield Right -of -Way Markings 3 Asleep or Fatigued 4 Improper Backing 29 Over - Correcting /Over- 5 III (sick) or Fatigued Driver Distracted By 4 Other Inside the Vehicle "m Turn Steering 6 Seizure, Epilepsy, Blackout 1 Not Distracted (Explain in Narrative) 2nd 10 Followed too Closely 30 Swerved or Avoided: Due 4th 7 Physically Impaired 5 External Distraction ❑ 11 Ran Red Light to Wind, Slippery 8 Emotional (depression, 2 Electronic Communication (outside the vehicle, explai 12 Drove too Fast for Conditions Object, Non-Motorist st lne� M� angry distur6bedd etc.) Devices (cell phone, etc.) in narrative) 13 Ran Stop Sign 9 Under the Influence of 3 Other Electronic Device Roadway, etc. 6 Textien 15 Improper Passing 31 Operated MV in Erratic, Medications /Drugs /Alcohol (navigation device, DVD player) 7 Inattentive 17 Exceeded Posted Speed Reckless or Aggressive Manner 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Driver Vison Obstructions 68 unknown 21 Wrong Side of Wrong Way 77 Other Contributing Factor 88 Unknown 25 Fail 1 Vision Not Obscured 5 Load on Vehicle 9 Smoke ed to Keep in Proper Lane 2 Inclement Weather 6 Building /Fixed Object 10 Glare • ' • 3 Parked /Stopped Vehicle 7 Signs /Billboards 77 All Other, Explain Helmet Use (HU) Eye Protection (EP) 4 Trees /Crops /Bushes 8 Fog in Narrative Restraint Systems 1 DOT - Compliant 1 Yes ❑ (RS) • ' • ' ' ' Motorcycle Helmet 2 No Motor Vehicle Seating Position: LOCATION: SEAT ROW OTHER 3 �ohHelmeemet 3 Not Applicabl 1 Not Applicable Seat Row Other (LOC) ❑ ❑ ❑ Air Bag 3 Shoulder eand nLap Belt Used Occupant 9 5 Deployed -Other 1 Left 1 Front 1 NotApplicabl k 4 Shoulder Belt Only Used ABD (nee, air belt, etc. 2 Middle 2 Second 2 Sleeper Section of Truck Cab ( ) 5 Lap Belt Only Used Ejection (EJECT) 6 Deployed - 3 Right 3 Third 3 Other Enclose Cargo Area 1 Not Applicable Combination 6 Restraint Used -Type Unknown 77 Other 4 Fourth 4 Unenclosed Cargo Area ❑ 1 Not Ejected ❑ 2 Not Deployed 7 Deployed- Curtai 7 Child Restraint System - Forward Facin (explain in 77 Other Row 5 Trailing Unit 2 Ejected - Totally 3 Deployed -Front 88 Deployment 8 Child Restraint System - Rear Facing narrative) 88 Unknown 6 Riding on Motor Vehicle Exterior (non- 3 Ejected - Partial 9 Booster Seat 88 Unknown trailing unit) 4 Not Applicable 4 Deployed -Side Unknown 10 Child Restraint -Type Unknown 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Non - Motorist Description Non - Motorist Location At Time of Crash Action Prior to Crash 1 Pedestrian 1 Intersection - Marked Crosswalk 8 Sidewalk 2 Other Pedestrian (wheelchair, person in a 2 Intersection - Unmarked Crosswalk 9 Median /Crossing Island 5 Walking /Cycling on Sidewalk d 6 In Roadwa Other (working building skater, pe estrian conveyance, etc. 3 Intersection -Other 10 Driveway Access y -- 3 Bicyclist 4 Midblock - Marked Crosswalk 11 Shared -Use Path or Trail playing, etc.) 4 Other Cyclist 5 Travel Lane - Other Location 12 Non - Trafficway Area 1 Crossing Roadway 7 Adjacent to Roadway (e.g., 5 Occupant of Motor Vehicle Not in Trans,poT 6 Bicycle Lane 77 Other, Explain in Narrativi 2 Waiting to Cross Roadway shoulder, median) (parked, etc.) 7 Shoulder /Roadside 88 Unknown 3 Walking /Cycling Along 8 Going to or from School (K -1 ) 6 Occupant of a Non -Motor Vehicle Roadway with Traffic (in or 9 Working in Trafficway Transportation Device Non- Motorist Actions /Circumstances adjacent to travel lane) (Incident response) 7 Unknown Type of Non - Motorist 1 No Improper Action 4 Walking /Cycling Along 10 None 2 Dart /Dash Roadway Against Traffic (in or 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Safety Equipment 1st 3 Failure to Yield Right -of -Way adjacent to travel lane) 88 Unknown 1 None 5 Lighting 4 Failure to Obey Traffic Signs, 2 Helmet 6 Not Applicable Signals, or Officer 7 Entering /Exiting Parked /Standing 10 Improper Turn /Merge 3 Protective Pads Used 77 Other, Explai ❑ 5 In Roadway Impproperly (standing, Vehicle 11 Improper Passing lying, working, playing) 8 Inattentive talkingg, eating, (elbows, knees, shins, etc.) 8 Narrative 2nd 6 Disabled Vehicle Related (working 9 Not Visible dark clothing, ote) 77 Other, Explain to Narrativeking 4 Reflective Clothing (jacket, 88 Unknown backpack, etc.) on, pushing, leaving /approaching) lighting, etc.) 88 Unknown ALCOHOL/DRUG/EMS SUSPECTED ALCOHOL TESTED: ALCOHOL IESI TYPE ALCOHOL �j BAC SUSPECTED DRUG TESTED: DRUG TEST TYPE: DRUG TEST RESULT: 1 Test Not Give 1 Blood 1 Positive 1 No ALCOHOL USE: 2 Test Refused Given 2 Breath 2 Completed L.�J I No USE:❑ 3 2 Test Test Given d 77 Other, 3 Pending 2 Yes ❑ 3 Test Given ❑ 3 Urine 88 Unknown 88 Unknown, if Tested 77 Other, Explain in 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 88 Unknown, if Tested Explain in Narrativ 88 Unknown Narrative SOURCE OF TRANSPORTTO MEDICAL FACILIT EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown •• • PERSON I VEHICLE I NAME DATE OF BIRTH INJ SEX LOC: 5 R 0 EJE 7777 CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE ZIP CODE SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILIT� EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown PERSON VEHICLE NAME DATE OF BIRTH INJ SEX LOC: S R 0 EJE HU EP ABD RS CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE ZIP CODE SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILITn EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown HSMV 90010 S (V /P) (rev 10/10) Page 3 of ..5 Vl was traveling westbound on CR809A in of her was splashing a massive amount of the right lane. D1 advised a vehicle in water on V1, so she decided to change front lanes for her safety. As she began to change lanes, Vl's rear tires lost traction with the roadway, causing its face of the spin back, rear to spin around. After it guardrail on the north side resulting in Vl�s left rear fender spun of the around, Vl °s left front crashed highway. This impact caused V1's and bumper crashing into the face into the front to of the guardrail and caused V1 to come to final rest. all persons to use Palm Beach Gardens Fire Rescue (PBGFR) responded to the scene and D1 refused treatment and transport to the hospital. The damage to V1 was estimated at approximately $5,000.00. hazards then existing. In every event, speed shall be controlled as may be necessary This Investigator finds that Driver 1 violated Florida State Statute 316.183(1) &(4)(e); No person shall drive a vehicle on a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions and having regard to the actual and potential hazards then existing. In every event, speed shall be controlled as may be necessary to avoid colliding with any person, vehicle, or other conveyance or object on or entering the highway in compliance with legal requirements and the duty of all persons to use due care. (4) The driver of every vehicle shall, consistent with the requirements of subsection (1), drive at an appropriately reduced speed when: (a) Approaching and crossing an intersection or railway grade crossing; (b) Approaching and going around a curve; (c) Approaching a hill crest; (d) Traveling upon any narrow or winding roadway; and (e) Any special hazard exists with respect to pedestrians or other traffic or by reason of weather or highway conditions. DATE OF BIRTH INJ I SEX * * Continued * * ZIP LMIAAMR&I SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILITn EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown PERSON 4 VEHICLE# NAME DATE OF BIRTH INJ I SEX LOC: S, R , O 1 EJECIJ HU I EP I ABD I RS SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO M 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative PERSON # PERSON # ADDRESS NAME OF VIOLATOR RANK & NAME CITY & STATE EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID FL STATUTE NUMBER k MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO CHARGE CITATION NUMBER /K4 ER HSMV 90010 S (N /D) (rev 10/10) Page 5 of 5 LONG •• F •• •• ■ ••• a (Shaded Areas) TOTAL 07/06/2012 2R50 AM 7/06/2012 12= 003542 818 421 OF COUNTY COD CITY CODE COUNTY OF CRASH PLACE OR CITY OF CRASH CHECK IF W1THI TIME REPORTED TIME DISPATCHED • TIME ON SCENE TIME CLEARED SCENE CHECK IF REASON if Investigation NOT Complete) Notified By: 1 Motorist ❑ COMPLETED 2 Law Enforcement 2 3`07 A� .3' ®7 Ail TOTAL CRASH OCCURRED ON STREET, ROAD, HIGHWAY AT STREET ADDRESS;; AT LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE OF • • , MILES N S E W110 AT FROM INTERSECTION WITH STREET, ROAD, HIGHWAY CRASH DATE TIME OF CRASH DATE OF REPORT REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER 07/06/2012 2R50 AM 7/06/2012 12= 003542 818 421 �OASH IDENTIFIERS COUNTY COD CITY CODE COUNTY OF CRASH PLACE OR CITY OF CRASH CHECK IF W1THI TIME REPORTED TIME DISPATCHED 6 78 PAL BEACH PAL BEACH GARDENS CITY LIMITS X 2:50 AM 2052 APB TIME ON SCENE TIME CLEARED SCENE CHECK IF REASON if Investigation NOT Complete) Notified By: 1 Motorist ❑ COMPLETED 2 Law Enforcement 2 3`07 A� .3' ®7 Ail NF MATI N CHOOSE ON CRASH OCCURRED ON STREET, ROAD, HIGHWAY AT STREET ADDRESS;; AT LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE C® Re 809A NORTHLAKE BLVD AT FEET MILES N S E W110 AT FROM INTERSECTION WITH STREET, ROAD, HIGHWAY OR FROM MILEPOST #i ❑��® HIA DR Road System Identifier 7 Forest Road Type of Shoulder Type of Intersection 1 Interstate 4 County 8 Private Roadway 1 Paved F4 2 U.S. 5 Local 9 Parking Lot 51 2 Unpaved 6 Turnpike Other, Explain in 3 Curb 1 Not at Intersection S Traffic Circle 7Five- Point, or More [i] 2 Four -Way Intersection 6 Roundabout 3 3 State /Toll 77 T- Intersection 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Narrative 4 Y- Intersection • • Light Condition Weather Condition Roadway Surface Condition School Bus Related Manner of Collision /Impact 1 Daylight 5 Dark -Not Lighted 4 Fog, Smog Smoke 5 Oil 2 Dusk 6Dark- Unknown 5 Sleet /Hail 6 Mud, Dirt, Gravel 1 No 2 Yes, School Bus 4 Sideswipe, same direction 3 Dawn Lighting 1 Freezing Rain 7 Sand 1 Directly Involved 5 Sideswipe, Opposite Directio 4 Dark - Lighted 77 Other, Explain in 6 Blowing Sand, Soil, 8 Water (standing/ 3 Yes, School Bus 6 Rear to Side Narrative Dirt moving) 1 Clear 1 Dry Indirectly Involve 7 Rear to Rear 1 Front to Rear 88 Unknown 7 Severe Crosswinds 77 Other, Explain 2 Cloudy 2 Wet 2 Front to Front BS Other, Explain in Narrative 3 Rain 77 Other, Explain in 4 Ice /Frost in Narrative 3 Angle Narrative gg Unknown First Harmful Event Non - Collision Collision Non -Fixed Object Collision with Fixed Object First Harmful Event 1 Overturn /Rollover 10 Pedestrian 19 Impact Attenuator /Crash 30 Concrete Traffic Barrier Location 2 Fire /Explosion 11 Pedalcycle Cushion 31 Other Traffic Barrier 1 On Roadway y 3 Immersion 12 Railway Vehicle (train, 20 Bridge Overhead Structure 32 Tree (standing) 2 Off Roadway Y 4 Jackknife engine) 21 Bridge Pier or Support 33 Utility Pole /Light Support 3 Shoulder ❑ 5 Cargo /Equipment 13 Animal 22 Bridge Rail 34 Traffic Sign Support Harmful Event 4 Median 6 Gore First Loss or Shift 14 Motor Vehicle in Transport 23 Culvert 35 Traffic Signal Support within Interchange 6 Fell /jumped From 15 Parked Motor Vehicle 24 Curb 36 Other Post, Pole or Support 7 Separator Motor Vehicle 16 Work Zone /Maintenance 25 Ditch 37 Fence 8 In Parking Lane or Zone 1 No 7 Thrown or Falling Equipment 26 Embankment 38 Mailbox 2 Yes Object 17 Struck by Failling, Shifting 27 Guardrail Face 39 Other Fixed Object (wall, 1 9 Outside Right -of -way 10 Roadside 88 Unknown 8 Ran into Water /Canal Cargo 28 Guardrail End building, tunnel, etc.) 88 Unknown 9 Other Non - Collision 18 Other Non -Fixed Object 29 Cable Barrier First Harmful Event Relation to Contributing Circumstances: Road Contributing Circumstances: Junction [�3] 5 Railway Grade Crossing 9 Worn, Travel- Polished Surface 10 Road Surface Condition (wet, y icy, snow, slush, etc.) 1 Environment _ 14 Entrance /Exit Ramp 11 Obstruction in Roadway Fil F 15 Crossover - Related 12 Debris 1 Non - Junction 16 Shared -Use Path or Trail 1 None 13 Traffic Control Device 2 Intersection 17 Acceleration /Deceleration Lane 4 Work Zone (construction/ Inoperative, Missing or Obscured 1 None 5 Animal(s) in Roadway 3 Intersection - Related 18 Through Roadway maintenance /utility) 14 Non- Highway Work 2 Weather Conditions 77 Other, Explain in 4 Driveway /Alley Access 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 6 Shoulders (none, low, soft, high) 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 3 Physical Obstruction(s) Narrative Related 88 Unknown 7 Rut, Holes, Bumps 88 Unknown 4 Glare 88 Unknown Work Zone Related Crash in Work Zone Type of Work Zone Workers in Work Zone Law Enforcement in 1 No 1 Before the First Work Zone 1 Lane Closure 1 No Work Zone 2 Yes ❑ Warning Sign ❑ 2 Lane Shift /Crossover ❑ 2 Yes ❑ 1 No 88 Unknown 2 Advance Warning Area 3 Work on Shoulder or Median 88 Unknown 2 Officer Present 3 Transition Area 4 Intermittent or Moving Work 3 Law Enforcement Vehicle 4 Activity Area 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Only Present 5 Termination Area NAME ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE NAME ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE NAME ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE VEHICLE PERSON41 PROPERTY DAMAGE -OTHER THAN VEHICLE EST. AMOUNT OWNER'S NAME (Check if Business) ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE PALM BEACH GARDENS 1 TREE AND BRUSH $2,000 10500 N. MILITARY TRAIL PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 33410 VEHICLE PERSON# PROPERTY DAMAGE -OTHER THAN VEHICLE EST. AMOUNT OWNER'S NAME F� (Check if Business) ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE HSMV 90010 S (E) (rev 10/10) Page 1 of REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER Check if Commer cial 1 12:003542 .81844421 VEHICLE LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRE Check if Permanen VIN 1 Vehicle in Transport 2 Parked Mothicle cl� L ®5/24/2 13 Registratior❑ 2T1 E22 22 3267 948 3 Working Vehicle Hit and Run 1 No YEAR MAKE MODEL STYLE COLOR DAMAGE: 1 Disabling 4 Minor EST. AMOUNT 2 Yes 51 2 2 T Y 2 E 2 Functional 88 Unknown 2 88 Unknown 3 None ®5 INSURANCE COMPANY INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER Towed due VEHICLE REMOVED BY 1 Rotation to Damage: ❑ AL FLORIDA TOWING 2 Owner Request EIC L S. . 4234975128 1 No 2 Yes 3 Driver 4 Other Explain in Narra ive NAME OF VEHICLE OWNER (Check if Business) ❑ CURRENT ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE RANDY F. MARSH 2424 SHORE DRn PALM BEACH 3341 TRAILER44 LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check if Permanen VIN YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES Registration❑ TRAILERN LICENSE NUMBER STATE REGISTRATION EXPIRES Check if Permanen VIN YEAR MAKE LENGTH AXLES Registration❑ VEHICLE N S E W Off -Road Unknown ON STREET, ROAD, HIGHWAY AT EST. SPEE POSTED SPEED TOTAL LANES TRAVELING❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ C® R. 8 9 ( RT ICE BLVD) 60 1 HAZ. MAT. RELEASED HAZ. MAT. PLACARD HAZ. MAT. NUMBER HAZ. MAT. CLASS Area of Initial Impact Most Damaged Area 1NO ❑ 1No 2 Yes .2 Yes 2 S u s BIG a 18 Undercarriage IS 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 040 MOTOR CARRIER NAME US DOT NUMBER 19 Overturn 19 1 76 1• 17 b 20 Windshield 20 1 1$ 1121 11 7® ® 21 T�ral filer 21 1 12 12 11 TO MOTOR CARRIER ADDRESS CITY & STATE ZIP CODE PHONE NUMBER Vehicle Body Type 141 Trafficway Commercial Motor Vehicle Configuration 15 Low Speed Vehicle 1 Two -Way, Not Divided 1 Vehicle 10,000 Ibs or less Placarded 8 Tractor /Triple for 16 (Sport) Utility Vehicle 2 Two -Way, Not Divided, with a Hazardous Materials 9 Truck more than 10,000 Ibs (4,53 17 Cargo Van (10 000 Ibs Continuous Left Turn Lane 2 Single -Unit Truck (2 -axle and GVWR kg), Cannot Classify Car kg) lessf more than 10,000 Ibs (4,536 kg) (4, or 3 Two -Way, Divided, Unprotected 10 Bus /Large Van (seats for 9 -15 18 Motor Coach Median 3 Single -Unit Truck (3 or more axles) occupants, including driver) 1 Passenger Car (P ainted >4 feet) 2 Passenger Van 19 Other Light Trucks (10,000 Ibs 4 Two -Way, Divided, Positive Media 4 Truck Pulling Trailers 11 Bus (seats for more than 15 3 Pickup (4,536 kg) or less) Barrier 5T Tractor (bobtail occupants, including driver) 7 Motor Home 20 Medium /Heavy Trucks (more tha 5 One -Way Trafficway 6 Truck Tractor /Semi - Trailer 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 101000 Ibs (4,536 kg)) 88 Unknown Trailer Type 7 Truck Tractor /Double Trailer 88 Unknown 8 Bus 11 Motorcycle 21 Farm Labor Vehicle 77 Other, Explain in Narrative TRAILER 1 TRAILER 2 1 Single Semi Trailer g pole Trailer Cargo Body Type 12 Moped p 88 Unknown 2 Tandem Semi Trailer 13 Intermodal 13 All Terrain Vehicle (ATV) 3 Tank Trailer 9 Towed Vehicle 3 Van /Enclosed Box Container Chassis 10 Auto Transport 4 Hopper 4 Saddle Mount /Trailer 14 Vehicle Towing Comm/Non-Commercial 77 Other, Explain i SPole- Trailer Another Vehicle 5 Boat Trailer 1 Interstate Carrier Narrative 6 Cargo Tank 2 Intrastate Carrier 6 Utility Trailer gg Unknown 1 No Cargo 7 Flatbed 15 Not Applicable 3 Not in Commerce /Government 7 House Trailer 2 Bus 8 Dump (vehicle 10,000 Ibs 4 Not in Commerce /Other Truck g 9 Concrete Mixer (4536 kg) or less not placard Comm 2 10,000 26,000 Ibs 14 536 11,793 kg) 10 Auto Transport 77 OthergExplaina Most Harmful Event Non- Collision 11 Auto Garbage/Refuse g GVWR/GCWR 3 More than 26,000 bs (11,793 kg) Narrative 1 Overturn /Rollover 12 Lo g 2 Fire /Explosion 4 Not Applicable 88 Unknown 3 Immersion Collision with Non -Fixed Object Collision with Non -Fixed Object 29 Cable Barrier Emergency [24 g y 4 Jackknife 10 Pedestrian 5 Car o /Equi ment Loss or Shift 19 Impact Overhead St Crash Cushion 30 Concrete Traffic Barrier g P 11 Pedalcycle 20 Bridge Overhead Structure 31 Other Traffic Barrier Vehicle Use 6 Fell /Jumped From Motor Vehicle 12 Railway Vehicle (train, engine) 21 Bridge Pier or Support 32 Tree (standing) Sequence of Events 7 Thrown or Falling Object 13 Animal 22 Bridge Rail 33 Utility Pole /Light Support 8 Ran into Water /Canal ❑ 1st 2nd 14 Motor Vehicle in Transport 9 Other Non - Collision 15 Parked Motor Vehicle p 23 Culvert 34 Traffic Sign Support 24 Curb 35 Traffic Signal Support [40 -46 Sequence of Events on /y 16 Work Zone /Maintenance 25 Ditch 36 Other Post, Pole, or Suppor 1 No [274 32 40 Equipment Failure (blown tir Equipment 26 Embankment 37 Fence 2 Yes brake failure, etc.) 17 Struck by Falling, Shifting Cargo or 27 Guardrail Face 38 Mailbox 88 Unknown 3rd 4th 41 Separation of Units Anything Set in Motion by Motor 28 Guardrail End 39 Other Fixed Object (wall, 42 Ran Off Roadway, Rig Vehicle building, tunnel, etc.) 43 Ran Off Roadway, Left 18 Other Non -Fixed Object 44 Cross Median 45 Cross Centerline Vehicle Maneuver Action Traffic Control Device For Vehicle Defects ❑ 46 Downhill Runawa 1 Straight Ahead 13 Stopped in Traffic This VehiCle Roadway Grade 3 Turning Left 14 Slowing 4 Backing 1 Level Roadway Alignment g 15 Negotiating a Curve 5 8 Flashing Signal ❑ ❑ i i h 5 Turning Right 16 Leaving y g 2 Hillcrest g Traffic Lane 9 Railway Crossing 12 Suspension 3 Uphill 1 Straight 6 Changing Lanes 17 Entering Traffic Lan Device 1 None 13 Wheels 8 Parked lil 4 Downhill 2 Curve Right 77 Other, Explain in 1 No Controls 10 Person (including 2 Brakes 14 Windows/ 10 Making U -Turn ❑ 5 Sag (bottom 3 Curve Left Narrative 4 School Zone Sign/ Flagman, Officer, 3 Tires Windshield 11 Overtaking/ 88 Unknown Device Guard, etc.) 4 Lights (head, 15 Mirrors Passing 5 Traffic Control 13 Warning Sign signal, tail) 16 Truck Coupling/ 77 Special Function 1 No Special Function 9 Ambulance 14 Intercity Bus Signal Other, Explain in 6 Steering Trailer Hitch/ of Motor Vehicle 2 Farm Vehicle 10 Fire Truck 15 Charter/Tour Bus 6 Stop Sign Narrative 7 Wipers Safety Chains Fil 3 Police 11 Farm Labor Transport 16 Shuttle Bus 7 Yield Sign 88 Unknown 9 Exhaust System 77 Other, Explain i 7 Taxi 12 School Bus 17 Farm Labor Bus 10 Body, Doors Narrative 8 Military 13 Transit /Commuter Bus 88 Unknown 11 Power Train 88 Unknown PERSON # NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON # NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER PERSON # NAME OF VIOLATOR FL STATUTE NUMBER CHARGE CITATION NUMBER HSMV 90010 S (V /P) (rev 10/10) Page 2 of REPORTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER . ® 12-003! 81844421 1 Driver VEHICLE # I NAME PHONE NUMBER Check if 2 Non - Motorist Recommend 3 Passenger al I I J L (561) 356 -6585 Driver Re -exam❑ CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE ZIP CODE 16801 ORANGE BLVD LOXAHATCHEE, FL 33470 DATE OF BIRTH SEX: DRIVER LICENSE NUMBER STATE EXPIRES INJURY SEVERITY (INJ) 1 Male 1 None 4 Inacitati 06/02/1991 2 Female 620436 1 02 Facap PL 06/02/2013 2 Possible 5 tal (within ng 30 days) ❑ 88 Unknown 3 Non - incapacitating 6 Non - Traffic Fatality DL Type Required Endorsements Drivers Actions at Time of Crash 1A 2B 3C 1st 26 Ran off Roadway 3rd Condition At 1 Yes 1 No Contributing Action 4 D /Chauffeur 2 No 2 Operated MV in Careless or 27 Disregarded other Traffic Time of Crash 5 E /Operator p Sign 6 E /Oper -Rest 3 No Req. Endorsement Negligent Manner 28 Disregarded Other Road ❑ 1 Apparently Normal 7 None 3 Failed to Yield Right -of -Way Markings 3 Asleep or Fatigued 4 Improper Backing 29 Over - Correcting /Over- 5 III (sick) or Fatigued Driver Distracted By 4 Other Inside the Vehicle '101 mproper Turn Steering 6 Seizure, Epilepsy, Blackout 1 Not Distracted (Explain in Narrative) 2nd Followed too Closely 30 Swerved or Avoided: Due 4th 7 Physically Impaired 5 External Distraction 1:1 11 Ran Red Light to Wind, o Slippery `°�I ' 8 Emotional depression, 2 Electronic Communication (outside the vehicle, ex tai 12 Drove too Fast for Conditions pP Y Surface, M L�I angry disturbed, etc. Devices (cell hone, etc.) P Object, Non - Motorist in g Y ) p n narrative) 13 Ran Stop Sign 9 Under the Influence of 3 Other Electronic Device Roadway, etc. 6 Texting 15 Improper Passing 31 Operated MV in Erratic, Medications /Drugs /Alcohol (navigation device, DVD player) 7 Inattentive 17 Exceeded Posted Speed Reckless or Aggressive Manner 77 Other, Explain in Narrative Driver Vison Obstructions 88 Unknown 21 Wrong Side of Wrong Way 77 Other Contributing Factor 88 Unknown 25 1 Vision Not Obscured 5 Load on Vehicle 9 Smoke Failed to Keep in Proper Lane 2 Inclement Weather 6 Building /Fixed Object 10 Glare • • • 3 Parked /Stoppped Vehicle 7 Signs /Billboards 77 All Other, Explain Helmet Use (HU) Eye Protection (EP) 4 Trees /Crops /Bushes 8 Fog in Narrative Restraint Systems 1 DOT- Complia nt 1 Yes 2 Other Helmet 3 Not Applicable Motor Vehicle Seating Position: LOCATION: SEAT ROW OTHER 3 No Helmet 1 Not Applicable Seat Row Other (LOC) ❑ ❑ ❑ 2 None Used -Motor Vehicle Occupant 1 Air Bag Deployed 5 Deployed -Other 3 Shoulder and Lap Belt Used 1 Left 1 Front 1 Not Applicabl ABID (knee, air belt, etc. 4 Shoulder Belt Only Used 2 Middle 2 Second 2 Sleeper Section of Truck Cab Ejection (EJECT) ( ) 6 Deployed- 5 Lap Belt Only Used 3 Right 3 Third 3 Other Enclose Cargo Area 1 Not Applicable Combination 6 Restraint Used - Type Unknown 77 Other 4 Fourth 4 Unenclosed Cargo Area 1 Not Ejected ❑ 2 Not Deployed 7 Deployed- Curtai 7 Child Restraint System - Forward Facing (explain in 77 Other Row 5 Trailing Unit 2 Ejected - Totally 3 Deployed -Front 88 Deployment 8 Child Restraint System -Rear Facing narrative) 88 Unknown 6 Riding on Motor Vehicle Exterior (non- 3 Ejected - Partial 4 Deployed -Side Unkno wn 9 Booster Seat 88 Unknown trailing unit) 4 Not Applicable 10 Child Restraint -Type Unknown 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 77 Other, Explain in Narrative kneigg arel [sill Non - Motorist Description Non - Motorist Location At Time of Crash Action Prior to Crash 1 Pedestrian 1 Intersection - Marked Crosswalk 8 Sidewalk 5 Walking /Cycling on Sidewalk 2 Other Pedestrian (wheelchair, person in a 2 Intersection - Unmarked Crosswalk 9 Median /Crossing Island 6 In Roadwa Other (working 3 Bic n ,skater, pedestrian conveyance, etc. ❑ 3 Intersection -Other 11 Driveway Access ) playing, etc. 3 Bicyclist 4 Midblock - Marked Crosswalk 11 Shared -Use Path or Trail ) 4 Other Cyclist 5 Travel Lane - Other Location 12 Non - Trafficway Area 1 Crossing Roadway 7 Adjacent to Roadway (e.g., 5 Occupant of Motor Vehicle Not in Transpo 6 Bicycle Lane 77 Other, Explain in Narrativ 2 Waiting to Cross Roadway shoulder, median) (parked, etc.) 7 Shoulder /Roadside 88 Unknown 3 Walking /Cycling Along 8 Going to or from School (K-12 ) 6 Occupant of a Non -Motor Vehicle Roadway with Traffic (in or 9 Working in Trafficway Transportation Device Non- Motorist Actions /Circumstances adjacent to travel lane) (incident response) 10 None 7 Unknown Type of Non - Motorist 1 No Improper Action 4 Walking /Cycling Along 77 Other 2 Dart /Dash Roadway Against Traffic (in or , Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown Safety Equipment 1st 3 Failure to Yield Right -of -Way adjacent to travel lane) 1 None 5 Lighting 4 Failure to Obey Traffic Signs, 2 Helmet 6 Not Applicable Signals, or Officer 7 Entering /Exiting Parked /Standing 10 Improper Turn /Merge 3 Protective Pads Used 77 Other, Explai ❑ 5 In Roadway Improperly (standing, Vehicle 11 Improper Passing lying, working, playing) 8 Inattentive (talkingg eating, (elbows, knees, shins, etc.) 8 Narrative 2nd 6 Disabled Vehicle Related (working 9 Not Visible (dark clothing, o c) 77 Other, Explain Riding Narr Walking 4 Reflective Clothing (jacket, 88 Unknown backpack, etc.) on, pushing, leaving /approaching) lighting, etc.) 88 Unknown • • SUSPECTED ALCOHOL TESTED: ALCOHOL TEST TYPE ALCOHOL jj'��� jjI BAC SUSPECTED DRUG TESTED: r{I�I DRUG TEST TYPE: DRUG TEST RESULT: Z Y ° HOL USE: 3 2 Test Test G ven d n 33 3 Urineh � 2 Completed I — 1 F 2DYes USE: 3 Test G e Refused 1 77 Blood Other ❑ 3 Pending ❑ 88 Unknown 88 Unknown, if Tested 77 Other, Explain in 88 Unknown 88 Unknown 88 Unknown, if Tested Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown Narrative SOURCE OFTRANSPORTTO MEDICAL FACILI EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTEDTO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 2 PALM BCH GDNS FR PBG12004929 GARDENS MEDICAL CENTER 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown ADDITIONAL PERSON VEHICLE NAME DATE OF BIRTH INJ SEX i LOC: S R O 1 EJELIJ HU I EP ABD RS CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE ZIP CODE SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILIT EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown PERSON VEHICLE NAME DATE OF BIRTH INJ SEX LOC: S R 0 EJE HU EP ABD RS CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE ZIP CODE SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILITn EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID EMS RUN NUMBER MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other, Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown HSMV 90010 S (V /P) (rev 10/10) Page of 5 Driver 1 was out of the vehicle upon my arrival. Post Miranda when I asked Driver 1 what happened and she stated "I drank too much ". Driver 1 stated that she felt like she had to vomit and she had a small amount of blood on the bridge of her nose. I called for Palm Beach Gardens Fire Rescue to respond. Driver 1 stated she was on her way home and was texting and lost control. I smelled a strong odor of an unknown alcoholic beverage coming from Driver 1�s breath as she spoke, her speech was slurred, her eyes were red and glassy and her face was flush. I asked Driver 1 how much she had to drink and she stated she had 115 Jack and Gingers and 3 shots ". Driver 1 was transported to Palm Beach Gardens Medical Center by Palm Beach Gardens Fire Rescue where the criminal investigation was turned over Officer Carmack. Officer Carmack requested blood and Driver 1 consented. When the blood results come back, Officer Carmack will be filing DUI charges against Driver 11 Per my investigation on scene, I find Driver 1 violated Florida State Statute 316.1925(1) for Careless Driving. * *END ** PERSON I VEHICLE I NAME DATE OF BIRTH INJ SEX LOC: S R 0 11E HU I EP AID RS CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE ZIP CODE SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILITY -- EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID I EMS RUN NUMBER I MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO FIIIIm, TAT91r, CURRENT 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other. Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown NAME OF VIOLATOR U ID /BADGEN FL FL STATUTE NUMBER STATE SEX I LOC: S_ R. 0 1 EIECTI H FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO CITATION NUMBE i . ` REPURTING AGENCY CASE NUMBER I HSMV CRASH REPORT NUMBER 1 Vehicle 1 was westbound on C. R. 809A (Northlake Blvd) in the left lane approximately 50 feet west Vehicle 1 of Hiatt Drive when the left traveled approximately 75 side tires struck the raised feet with the left side tires concrete median. on the median before Vehicle 1 °s proceeded right side tires struck across all the eastbound the median. Vehicle 1 then crossed lanes. Vehicle 1 came to rest the median and in the woods on the south side of the roadway. Vehicle 1 sustained moderate front end damage. Driver 1 was out of the vehicle upon my arrival. Post Miranda when I asked Driver 1 what happened and she stated "I drank too much ". Driver 1 stated that she felt like she had to vomit and she had a small amount of blood on the bridge of her nose. I called for Palm Beach Gardens Fire Rescue to respond. Driver 1 stated she was on her way home and was texting and lost control. I smelled a strong odor of an unknown alcoholic beverage coming from Driver 1�s breath as she spoke, her speech was slurred, her eyes were red and glassy and her face was flush. I asked Driver 1 how much she had to drink and she stated she had 115 Jack and Gingers and 3 shots ". Driver 1 was transported to Palm Beach Gardens Medical Center by Palm Beach Gardens Fire Rescue where the criminal investigation was turned over Officer Carmack. Officer Carmack requested blood and Driver 1 consented. When the blood results come back, Officer Carmack will be filing DUI charges against Driver 11 Per my investigation on scene, I find Driver 1 violated Florida State Statute 316.1925(1) for Careless Driving. * *END ** PERSON I VEHICLE I NAME DATE OF BIRTH INJ SEX LOC: S R 0 11E HU I EP AID RS CURRENT ADDRESS (Number and Street) CITY & STATE ZIP CODE SOURCE OF TRANSPORT TO MEDICAL FACILITY -- EMS AGENCY NAME OR ID I EMS RUN NUMBER I MEDICAL FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO FIIIIm, TAT91r, CURRENT 1 Not Transported 2 EMS 3 Law Enforcement 77 Other. Explain in Narrative 88 Unknown NAME OF VIOLATOR U ID /BADGEN FL FL STATUTE NUMBER STATE SEX I LOC: S_ R. 0 1 EIECTI H FACILITY TRANSPORTED TO CITATION NUMBE i Officer Melinda Hanton #306 12- 003642 7!6112 0 -- -------- - - - - -- - -- :.. ------- - - - - -- �x�q, k. CR 809A (NORTIt)WE BLVD) Drawing Not To Scale. w d ❑ m fy w ❑ w1r, 7 �,qqll . . . . . . . . . . Iva loom V, R • _ I Ir C e • li � M i� • �4 � F • t 1 *`. 't • r` 4 4.. ; _ i. ■ PIV . "' ` F F. �� Go gl I I 1x'51 DP' o.Re. 129 , w 1se6 VWO05m FI(: roe) - WATERMELER 03NOIETE 10' D.E. I I RADIUS IX EIDSDNG mn SICIMALK PoBTT ISO (DIRK 10197, PG. ]!O)� H)) I TYPICAL OH OVERHEAD U.E _ �Y,DL NM PAD L °Tp&Qvc. UAST"M L -. STOP ROTA ELECTRIC ,rQONOTIXTERr�_._..__ LU:1 ?N:nii (22�' PRO{P��m F.O.R CNNRFMwG ,,,�,,,,,,,,,,,,, WATBt VALVE c;x :TYP. �....,..,..,_ WDBIEDEI£CIOR_ I Ir�1 I SURVEYOR: T9�IIGRq N B 4165, 'a TYP I<= lY wS.B. WAS; - eBOPOk G r % . _� a Ia IiL EASenerr r * ORB 30528 PG.1533 S vn, I Rza rI�I , I oRa 1m,=a l5az � aalloi t � 8 is s - - 11 V v w aaa laww I -' I,.,�- '� -ar.„ '�" ". . - ".. I j �' i -� ,,..> „�r�, -nom' ° ,.., r=�•.r .:z°%' �-�- .,,,,�' ,=' �'"; r 9 2w s SIR ° IV ' " 8 I Q -a 1 24.7 I&Y iq1 x z4' I r �r 9 .,..:.. le -.•-zr IwFRa. 31 940 M a - - 1 I I 125 �'' ' M PEDESTRIAN U PG. 1910 i ✓ ,t "'JIM AIR BRICK mm I ©I r' 26x000 SF . = °. '� , , , : y ,� y 12• uxommcuN mwmcr{nn,° III II vavms 7 1.1 7 �wALL '�ww "?" r "' 'y vAn '` � If va tx BASa�T Mnn "^` "`P I I �r -�-' of oauc t s i B 0° ,� ^fl raL Pno tinun losxe, PB. vm I I MR96PAO � laFxFAm�1 101 / .. 10225, FQ 153? �� �•, - ' ^: O.R,¢:ri910,P6I810 1Y 1a 1 I r r s °rBB' Rsd' _ FPLTRANSFORMER ]YNY� - 1 CITa�K' 1 yII r .. GRESEP N A 2r�5TGN M P asT I --- -�IOYaP. m O -, SIOF�j 85IOP • MIX -All OPOSD ss9 s OEmMTIVE 2. SIGN; TI(P. la a BIT � Z4' BRIM I ' I VIII II Is. 1a 6 1 u r b4� 7 -- - 35 � I? I� © 38. la ALO t . f % 6BtAIX VBM ' �i Q I f -- . - - . 18.9 VALVES SPACE 105 awA YOH LBI JIR 1 - I-- 21' -!- m a( 3 5 1a la 1a TITrLar I 3 � � I 1zr � I, �i1NANG, r REi %alS.ScinCB BU�Iditt�i 3a BIlREIi SIAIPBULBIIY F/SB4EM �1 P i'"D qq yam" t t Y 6 N.2 61i 3F 7H rRBuau P�GAeB` a \ 22.ORAwA(£AUTMYE/SE1rcNT to CAF S (P.9.5 (6.180.1617 I is FADS ��. 185 S ✓ !� ara Id x 1 - I \qA??�V ♦ '`=,,- r �' '= `' ;'7+"an.e.umaeG aesr �1,} I PROPOSED O TIP.L3°`r 105{7- 2�Sp� -IB.S / • \ V'.. '. .� 369_.. -- I Ail I I ICI I r I II "I I I;I I �IQ I 18 I PSI ' I I 11 I'I I 11a I'I I I,I I I s I'I 1x1 I 14 x¢ d-MY oIH IN - - - " �90�l,PADS SIORSIGN& .. ISM I S•." roe 1 I L_ I .: \ „ \ mNC UTSiT-' _: - _ J_ _ _ -- - "_•_ - DxaPUPF zs wix xt rnDSnvi 14 ILr9Grl 0.111h PLCKUP mNPD1TT11 gOp�y \ VA� I FA \ \ \ tl RCBB06 W NOT - - - - - - NC]6N � POLE; �., j r� Ia DO 1 -_ � Y/ TORO�pi -TPA T 1RWGC ON -® = _ 7 g �_ la 41�. O R30 D A NOLE �F GN C EANOU LW I .ID8 SmNIPOL MIMP PAD QJFODi6; b BRI�IX PAVERS -.CH VALVE . �. la 18.5 r, T1 J LI R12S M _ I I tTI.SWRLT `- - mIDR01 -- -x'� -, 1 - - �I O IV 18. O la TE vALVFS - w• O 10.5 1a �O D 10 IV &T WTE:TYP. Zl'DIILDYB WATIX MNVG94INT -_ - - - - _ -_ M -aOB _.. M(m S, ND: F/5HENf ,119�8'i0t: -._.. - 1z s11RRIlYEASd1Lxr mN -= - - - u - - - . '�(F850,P6: 160- 161) - T ..'.`0R613aiB,PD -1106 ,�„ _ ..v. GA PaISRPAb ®� __ -m - SIYSVLDIIlSIYEASENENT y WATMIXVALVE yy TER __. TE _ -.AS MA DI FAVOR '�'°''.�- ... _ _ WA V,¢VE _ OF NPB"..ID (PJL�iS,PG£166161__ - - -- � -�- �- '. '"__- - V�1� =� � �SVOIMY ••' '" �- {�ETESPNDDR 6' � AT&T 8 HEIDWAII • >- _POINT _- mNc s9z °3e'S4w BH.9T . WAIHiVRVE � WOOD FENCE LU: ROS _..- ZN: Ml - _ - _ - _ - .. J REC�REATTIONNAL BEACH (UNPLAD'RED) RESYSE SERVIa SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY WAY OF INDIVIOUAL WMPSTER AND RECYOING AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. WPS SHALL. BE PROVIDED AT ALL INIFASECDONS WITH HANDICAP PARIONG AND DRIVE ISLES IN ACCORDANCE WOH ADA AND THE FLORIDA HANDICAP A(XESSIBBITY03DE. ALLSIGIGESHALLCONFORMTOTHEREQUIRD4ENTSOFTHECDYOFPAU4 BEADI GARDENS IDRS OR WAIVER55HALL BE SOUOfT FROM CITY WIINOL TYPE D OR F RAISED CONCRETE DIR ®NG SHALL BE LtSED WRHIN MAMtNG 19ANDS AND WRHw VFHIDIIFR USI:AREAS. ALL SIDEWALKS SHALL BE A MU BRIM OF 5 FEET IN WIDTH PER THE L1MS THE W1LOwG, LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DESIGN SMALL MAKIMRE THE USE OF OPTED DESIGN PRINCP(ES. SK ISSAFESIGHTTROANGIESHALLBEPROWDEDATTHEPROTECTENTRY DRIVE. ALL PARKING LOT STRIPING, E)( P FOR PARKING SPA.Q'S, SHALL RE CONSTRUCTED USING THERMO%ISIC MATFIUAL IN I.CNRDANIX WITH LDR SECTION 78 -344. ALL KANDIW Afi$5®IE RAMPS SHALL MEETPLL APPLICPBtE, REGIONA1.PND STATEADFSSIBRJTY GUIDEllNESAND REGl11TI0NS. ANY MODIDCATIONs SKULL BE APPROVED BY THE 15IMNEER-0FREQORD. THE SITE SH RCA. WMPLY WITH MR 78- 376. THERE SHALL BE NO OUTDOOR STORAGE AREAS PERPITM ON SITE N.I. PAVEMEM MARKING AND STRIDING, D(CLIA1wG PARKIK3 STAILS SHA I. BE INSTALID WITH THERMOPLASTIC MATERIALS. ALSO, PAVER BRICKS OP APPROPRIATE COLOR SHALI. BE USED ON PAVER OEM AREAS, IN UHI OF PAINT OR THERMOPLASTIC MATERW_ #' i , LOTS 7 AND 8, PLAT OF P.G.A. NATIONAL COMMERCE PARK PLAT NO. 21 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 78 PAGES 135, AND 1361 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM ikH COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGEND CONC 03NOIETE BLWa Vlm RADIUS IX EIDSDNG mn SICIMALK 0 ISO GATE; TYP. TYPICAL I Ail I I ICI I r I II "I I I;I I �IQ I 18 I PSI ' I I 11 I'I I 11a I'I I I,I I I s I'I 1x1 I 14 x¢ d-MY oIH IN - - - " �90�l,PADS SIORSIGN& .. ISM I S•." roe 1 I L_ I .: \ „ \ mNC UTSiT-' _: - _ J_ _ _ -- - "_•_ - DxaPUPF zs wix xt rnDSnvi 14 ILr9Grl 0.111h PLCKUP mNPD1TT11 gOp�y \ VA� I FA \ \ \ tl RCBB06 W NOT - - - - - - NC]6N � POLE; �., j r� Ia DO 1 -_ � Y/ TORO�pi -TPA T 1RWGC ON -® = _ 7 g �_ la 41�. O R30 D A NOLE �F GN C EANOU LW I .ID8 SmNIPOL MIMP PAD QJFODi6; b BRI�IX PAVERS -.CH VALVE . �. la 18.5 r, T1 J LI R12S M _ I I tTI.SWRLT `- - mIDR01 -- -x'� -, 1 - - �I O IV 18. O la TE vALVFS - w• O 10.5 1a �O D 10 IV &T WTE:TYP. Zl'DIILDYB WATIX MNVG94INT -_ - - - - _ -_ M -aOB _.. M(m S, ND: F/5HENf ,119�8'i0t: -._.. - 1z s11RRIlYEASd1Lxr mN -= - - - u - - - . '�(F850,P6: 160- 161) - T ..'.`0R613aiB,PD -1106 ,�„ _ ..v. GA PaISRPAb ®� __ -m - SIYSVLDIIlSIYEASENENT y WATMIXVALVE yy TER __. TE _ -.AS MA DI FAVOR '�'°''.�- ... _ _ WA V,¢VE _ OF NPB"..ID (PJL�iS,PG£166161__ - - -- � -�- �- '. '"__- - V�1� =� � �SVOIMY ••' '" �- {�ETESPNDDR 6' � AT&T 8 HEIDWAII • >- _POINT _- mNc s9z °3e'S4w BH.9T . WAIHiVRVE � WOOD FENCE LU: ROS _..- ZN: Ml - _ - _ - _ - .. J REC�REATTIONNAL BEACH (UNPLAD'RED) RESYSE SERVIa SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY WAY OF INDIVIOUAL WMPSTER AND RECYOING AS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. WPS SHALL. BE PROVIDED AT ALL INIFASECDONS WITH HANDICAP PARIONG AND DRIVE ISLES IN ACCORDANCE WOH ADA AND THE FLORIDA HANDICAP A(XESSIBBITY03DE. ALLSIGIGESHALLCONFORMTOTHEREQUIRD4ENTSOFTHECDYOFPAU4 BEADI GARDENS IDRS OR WAIVER55HALL BE SOUOfT FROM CITY WIINOL TYPE D OR F RAISED CONCRETE DIR ®NG SHALL BE LtSED WRHIN MAMtNG 19ANDS AND WRHw VFHIDIIFR USI:AREAS. ALL SIDEWALKS SHALL BE A MU BRIM OF 5 FEET IN WIDTH PER THE L1MS THE W1LOwG, LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING DESIGN SMALL MAKIMRE THE USE OF OPTED DESIGN PRINCP(ES. SK ISSAFESIGHTTROANGIESHALLBEPROWDEDATTHEPROTECTENTRY DRIVE. ALL PARKING LOT STRIPING, E)( P FOR PARKING SPA.Q'S, SHALL RE CONSTRUCTED USING THERMO%ISIC MATFIUAL IN I.CNRDANIX WITH LDR SECTION 78 -344. ALL KANDIW Afi$5®IE RAMPS SHALL MEETPLL APPLICPBtE, REGIONA1.PND STATEADFSSIBRJTY GUIDEllNESAND REGl11TI0NS. ANY MODIDCATIONs SKULL BE APPROVED BY THE 15IMNEER-0FREQORD. THE SITE SH RCA. WMPLY WITH MR 78- 376. THERE SHALL BE NO OUTDOOR STORAGE AREAS PERPITM ON SITE N.I. PAVEMEM MARKING AND STRIDING, D(CLIA1wG PARKIK3 STAILS SHA I. BE INSTALID WITH THERMOPLASTIC MATERIALS. ALSO, PAVER BRICKS OP APPROPRIATE COLOR SHALI. BE USED ON PAVER OEM AREAS, IN UHI OF PAINT OR THERMOPLASTIC MATERW_ #' i , LOTS 7 AND 8, PLAT OF P.G.A. NATIONAL COMMERCE PARK PLAT NO. 21 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 78 PAGES 135, AND 1361 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM ikH COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGEND CONC 03NOIETE R RADIUS IX EIDSDNG SW SICIMALK 0 LANDSCAPE BUFFER TYP. TYPICAL OH OVERHEAD U.E UfO1TY EASEMENT m ' I 'II APPLICANT: ARCHITECT: HIATT SCHOOL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, LLC TERCILLA COURTEMANCHE ARCHITECTS 1645 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD, SUITE 1200 2D47 VISTA PARKWAY, SUITE 100 WEST PALM BEACH, R 33401 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33411 561.655.7200 561.478.4457 DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: ENGINEERITRAFFIC CONSULTANT: JOHNSTON GROUP LAND DEVELOPMENT SIMMONS & WHITE CONSULTANTS, INC. 5601 CORPORATE WAY, SUITE 200 601 HERITAGE DRIVE, SUITE 127 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33407 JUPITER, FL 33458 561.478.7848 561.691.4552 DAR 0 SURVEYOR: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT /PLANNER: LIDBERG LAND SURVEYING COTLEUR & HEARING, INC. 675 WEST INDIANTOWN RD, SUITE 200 1934 COMMERCE LANE, SUITE 1 JUPITER, FL 33458 JUPITER, FL 33458 561.746.8454 561.747.6336 ;i 40' EAMO7PROCED RCERISSA1mDAROR S07177 JOB NUMBER DATE 12.1107 12 -17 -12 I PRC TEE I EEEEM iR 520121T0OSODODO113070 -0" North 04 -26-13 SEA RAD77 ®130B is, 0, ❑ I 009 EEO DAR 0 i PR1PI EEARDx S07Sq'l� Em Ml PRIP6 ®® Ml I I I GF' EEEE EAT TOTAL SIIEAREA 448,819 1030 AC LAND USE ALLOCATION SF AC % ®011][JEEERA07 Esem 20G 300] ®R ESQ4Re. 157,601 3.62 35.10 SUEEIAE310PEA1A 21,m 0.50 OCEI R®te.0®1oSO 26,00 0.61 5.® ®C S@1[3 2g00 0.67 6.50 ER=PAOJLTI7EMRS 111,630 Z.56 2007 RCTOPOTIMAREA 15,222 0.35 3.137 TOTAL 44SA22 10.30 100.0% SURFACE COVER IMPEHOLQ3 AR@ SF AC % AT ®®DEEIRAm 15,05 2.00 II]® ®.R CSCIARIA 157,601 3.62 35.10 SEEEOACODPIAIA 21,00 0.50 Om Lj TOTAL IMPERVIDS 266,458 6.12 59.40/0 PEPIDIICS AREA R®IEACHILAOSO 26,00 0.61 5.® .; ®1AS010EII 2UEZ 0.67 6.030 LAOSOAPOC=ES ACOCR=SPA07 111,630 2.56 20 170 R ®AREA 15,222 0.35 3.3011 TOTAL PERVIOUS 182,364 2.91 40.63% TOTAL 4481822 9.03 100.0% *03pervio0:T PervioCML l S ®re Tmtage iEB ® 10 over i@ DOW [Re area oO71J00 ® ID da W a Dull Oargin oCA0error L •I dE ing dralIN INT W SO10OL ATTIONAL BUILDING DATA BUILDING #1 REEAMA ®EAREIRS® 61,317 SO ® 1S07RO 33® OASSREEMS 56 O� 3,007 SO EREPRTIAD S 1,1® S(� BUILDING #2 ®Olm 26,000 SO ® 1 S(SRO 26 111" CROSS BIID.DDNGTOTAL 87,317 SF FAR CALCU ATIOPI 0.19 PARKING DATA REQ PROV ❑ffi11 PR OTLAQmm 0/3005M ❑ ❑ RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL 1 :ONEAT 0IMCIE AROOM�07]73 m /®SSREEMO L8 0/25GS12 P103 13PD3II.Y 11AEPEEU10 S 0 1❑ 118 CAMP ® ®®.m 7 7 TOTAL 269 273 REQ PRUV LJEADSPA0312EM50 2 3 1 1 ❑tASORE MEA= 1 1 �PA03 IS ®+Am omm 15 25 LANDSCAPE POINTS -. EPEIDSPAm®2 1A03i❑AP1P 111,630 SO _ R ®OIlAIS❑IPEP 15 POIIIS PER 100 SO 16,713 PE7III3 LOCAT/ONMAP N 0' 20' %7%m:7 40' 80' 120' 160' JOB NUMBER DATE 12.1107 12 -17 -12 Scale: 1" = 40' -0" North DESIGNED DEH DRAWN APPROVED Ni DEH JOB NUMBER DATE 12.1107 12 -17 -12 REVISIONS 01 -30-13 03 -16-13 04 -26-13 I9 O.M. SP .DWG • Landscape Architects Land Planners Environmental Consultants 1934 Commerce Lane Suite 1 Jupiter, Florida 33458 561.747.6336 • Fax 747.1377 w .cotleurheadng.com Lic# LC- C000239 -r SW J\ 'vwU M0 ,,V f1u� U N E V fo d v Rj 1 QC DESIGNED DEH DRAWN APPROVED NBP DEH JOB NUMBER DATE 12 -1107 12 -17 -12 REVISIONS 01 -30-13 03 -15-13 04 -2613 April 26, 2011 9:28:49 a.m. Drawing: 10 -1212 5P.DWG SHEET Z OF 3 ®COREUR& HFARNG, INC. IP 44 Y ,yfS ArfS Arcs Aas V VP ll V Ul CX 14NDI PMnwGSIGN �" BLACK VINYL COATED TOP RAIL POST TIE WIRES H` PEnA REWIREMENrs 18. caons: I2T NOE: S1TMWLTO BE a• TYPE: MADRAX 5 LOOP HEAVY DUTY WINDER CHAIN LINK FENCE TIE WIRES ru' Dane P m TOP 6maD� a eanDER -vnmE WIDE WHITE mM�C TERMINAL ® 15" CENTERS SIDEWNK `w"�51°' / Landscape Architects EDGE OF PAVFNEM;FIL3H WnH SIDEWAD( BOTTOM TIXT &eDRDER =BIAIX PAINT ON PAVEMENT OR ® 24' TOPOMBACONND D= �''e°� 1• WIEN-D PAVERS. COLOR: POWDER POST LINE POST TOP BACKND=B =WMTIE 36' / \, / \�� /n. TmI� ®AENANatcw CENTERS Land Planners sraus 4Y FINISH: POWDER COAT Environmental Consultants vemE 1934 Commerce Lane STRETCHER O 6" Es�IeiaaeoaDac. elAaciR• BAR Suite 1 BA UND =w Jupiter, Florida 33458 a'mvsoxu.BwESwra ia• v `�, .vC `�'�� - �` c ��J ` vY 561.747.6336 •Fax 747.1377 PER wor wDEx www.cotleuTheadng.com r PAmT ®IewEJ Srxaa � < � i � ,. ,� L� X{ �C�� Lic#LGC000239 r D CURS DETAff SH CAN DETA/L HOOK BOLTS PAFI@IG SPFQ -y� 'Y �. t;:!ti^ / .. y z RAD 6" " "�� ' III = III T =III —I f 111=1 II —III =1 PAVEMENT 6 BRACE RAIL 36 MIN. xMmrrP wuumr�s � - 18" •. M PFA aDE kv� -8 "� 10' MAX 1 E CONCRETE c M�w'I�ICF PAWtpI inisne raae FLAG POLE DETA /L Ch �� ri►�,,�, Vii► I, �7`i(pe4� � � _ •,��ir�� �`� °,!!°°°i�"� �����,� ` ��'�f ���in.'. =.� r "r ,.,�,,,,,�.,.�,w,.�.,,"b�, �- +mss\. -�, ® ` .111111 � ¢� ti � ��I � 1 '•r. 15J'• © �Ia 1. T °�or�Jo`O/ rogn�ap�o.'ox ;o�u;� • ,- �♦� °,,. Doo 000 Doo�•�.;� o�. o END C��wINZA ,I�_ � � � � �o° cco �;`.'� , �OOO 'r1�1117��r7�✓1C��7���7�� ��nnl f�i '/ / / /���/ •1��JJFF ���1L�1�`YIk1l�ftii�" I - �i. ■ - - - - _� • � -. � �+ ,�, file . —.� �� ' �.. •. �``i���� "���+ `�� �I�I�I�� Imo' Ii����� ,. ��� ��i�`'��►�' (� ���-= ;���.5't�����1�e���t�F� .�.��s'.�Rit'IL �' � � .. ; � � *�i �i1�1 �s �. altiel _ wli�S2..is� M .f +• e,. \Ai +l.�'� +� �i ;iii�a�i�� .�iit• �, �li�i R ■' 1 , . - •�- �• ,.. �. ._._ '7���.h ww�-w.,,.,..,,,,1�,,,� ' j� �lL9�/I,11'1.1 Cotleur & Hearing Landscape Architects Land Planners Environmental Consultants 1934 Commerce Lane Suite 1 Jupiter, Florida 33458 561.747.6336 - Fax 747.1377 www.cotleurhearing.com Lic# LC- 0000239 C� .N f � O L1.. O _ d � fv W � U a� V � fv a v v, m� W DESIGNED DEN DRAWN RW APPROVED DEH JOB NUMBER 12-1107 GATE 12 -17 -12 REVISIONS 01 -29-13 03 -1513 042513 Apra 26, 2013 6:57:1• a.m. D.a.my: 12 -1107 LP.DWG SHEET 1 OF 3 0 COTIEURI HEEMING, INC. �bE, u.Ibmii �am�popmo� M 9M. b M•9 M� N, aw4 Fm6k.N �pmA.aParbinNid FPL EASEMENT LB. 10528, PG. 1533 LB. 10225, PG. 1532 LU:I ZN: Ml VAfd.T CLEANOUTJ I Existing Office ui/d'ing Building # 1 -Story 26' -2" HTI CONC. PAD WITH WELL RUMP a TOT 1600 SF ASEMENT 'EASEMENT 38, PG 1486 BACKFLOW PREVENiOR . IATER METER - nrwwo„ CONNECl1 - - - - -" TO PARK _ — . _r .. _ _ UNPL4TTED) I — I LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND ON SITE MEETING WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UPON THE COMPLETION OF EXOTIC AND NUISANCE VEGETATION REMOVAL AND PRIOR TO THE AM OF NEW SUPPLEMENTAL/ REPLACEMENT LW E. I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I F ® rL % 1 I I I •I 1 I Landscape Plan- o, 15' 30' 60' 90' 120' Scale: 1" = 30' North Cotleur & Hearing Landscape Architects Land Planners Environmental Consultants 1934 Commerce Lane Suite 1 Jupiter, Florida 33458 561.747.6336 - Fax 747.1377 www.cotleurhearing.com Lic# LC- C000239 C�w\ V` SV U1O1 O _ O v5 fa (w L U [D N � \ m V f0 v DESIGNED DEH DRAWN RW APPROVED DEH JOB NUMBER 12-1107 pA7E 12 -17 -12 REVISIONS 01 -29-13 03 -15-13 042613 ApOr i,g:012 1107 LP.DWC SHEET 2 OF 3 e C0ILEOR 6 NFARNG, INC. be iu�tra�'re.�maer� ran 1111 ' .I 4 loll. 10.111 1 NOOLDS01 IXVI 15 FROM PAIN SEND o.0SERTHAN 1V MOM SUP, UTILITIES I 1 REPASSED 9AAA0,11111 sill USE AREAS AU- AREAS SHALL BE �Y IRRIGATED IN ACCORDANCE � THE REWIREMENIS OFTHE OTf OFP" BEI THE IRRIGATION SiSTEM SMILE BE AND LOCAL REMIREMENIS, NO VERTEX CONMUCtION OR PLANTINGS WtI. BE PLACED IVnHUN 'rHE 2D-R)OT LAIIE MAINTENANCE EkSEMW, AND I•a = I. Fj 111,3111 � • i_ .1 16746 TOTAL REQUIRED LANDSCAPE POINTS 26425 TOTAL P0.OPO6ED LANDSCAPE PNMS 9,679 TMALADDLYMNALIANCSGPEPOINIS MG PREFERED SPECIES PAIROU RrcE LRm% LANDSCAPE POINTS 111,6]0 60 r. ` AsLffl TREES PALMS %NATIVE O 72.650 500 % DROUGHT TOLERANT (••) ®.600 Ia.00 F"N7 L757 SLRIb Gil:.! u1 R RI .Puyl i G ....I. e m, T� • � L:��' I1 PREVIOUSLY ROOT' PRUNED SMALL OBTAIN 11)11.1 IlaLl - \J. ISO GROMIN � AND ttlll SHALL BE WATERED AS N� OR VVmffN 24 HOURS AFIIR NOTIFICATION BY THE Iy itlli�jl II i, 1 1+ LUECRUJI llal+ o so �EWMM PLXED IN THE HOLE DURING RANTNE. 70P DRESSING MY 3 NOT . -rllll l _ !II WEWWMr USUAL MD AVITERUL- FOR SOIL MMENDMR(M AND HImILVER I'RNT IS TO INSURE z. PLANra1D TREf3 all 0 as 1010 1 "M VNITHIN 3' OF SIUMS. SUILCIURE 1 PLANT WATEtTHOROUGHLY FOLIAGE ABOVE MUI DURING POUDDS OF HOT 9.)N AND/OR VIAND AT TIME OF MARTINS, PROVIDE PROFIEMEIVE O� LMVNBI HOURS PRIOR TO LA!fINM. WPOKDED STANDARD PLUMNIG Mg M FINISH DESIGN BEVATIONS, ROU. PREPARED LKAN SURFAM as- PER1 SK l� ••I i 1] d 1 4 f •L 'al �'. 1 QTY FROA 3 OIL 1%3 UL 3 139MAREDA ■ ■ ■IIIIL• RIEIIIII' ■ SEIM 1I AROEHR C .III■ 1•$CALIf91 2LB410CAl.Net 2PBT 1'C11IPBt 6- AND WiGEt 30617OTL1Pe2 2PERI- CALIPER, T� • � L:��' I1 PREVIOUSLY ROOT' PRUNED SMALL OBTAIN 11)11.1 IlaLl - \J. ISO GROMIN � AND ttlll SHALL BE WATERED AS N� OR VVmffN 24 HOURS AFIIR NOTIFICATION BY THE Iy itlli�jl II i, 1 1+ LUECRUJI llal+ o so �EWMM PLXED IN THE HOLE DURING RANTNE. 70P DRESSING MY 3 NOT . -rllll l _ !II WEWWMr USUAL MD AVITERUL- FOR SOIL MMENDMR(M AND HImILVER I'RNT IS TO INSURE z. PLANra1D TREf3 all 0 as 1010 1 "M VNITHIN 3' OF SIUMS. SUILCIURE 1 PLANT WATEtTHOROUGHLY FOLIAGE ABOVE MUI DURING POUDDS OF HOT 9.)N AND/OR VIAND AT TIME OF MARTINS, PROVIDE PROFIEMEIVE O� LMVNBI HOURS PRIOR TO LA!fINM. WPOKDED STANDARD PLUMNIG Mg M FINISH DESIGN BEVATIONS, ROU. PREPARED LKAN SURFAM as- PER1 SK l� ••I i 1] d 1 4 f •L 'al �'. 6.0 1 QTY FROA FEE 6 BN 139MAREDA ■ ■ ■IIIIL• RIEIIIII' ■ SEIM 1I AROEHR C .III■ A.S. IIIIII■ ■ ■111• TOTAL 111■ N • 111111111111111 •■IIIIIIRII ONEDASAIm PREFERRED PREFERRED ODAMAIREPS ■■ 1111 EIRE'[ ■I■ "8 515M M ■III■ A.S. 01 ■111■ POINTS POINTS SPECIES LIST SPECIES QTY SM BOTANICALA64ME COMMONA14NE SjZE SPA C17VG A ■ 1 10 14 CANOPY I AEEIAEM PAESI IEMA ■■ ■1111 A.S. Elm ■111■ 1 211 ■1008 VOILA 1EEE SAME = ■ =[A=■ AEI• 1211D613, E E A.S. EE[Im ErPO 61 15 . A 4 CA aI1EPE1EEEM ERASMMESEJ EY • DILULL ■ EC CECIL E 1115 ■r .• ■ A.S. D.11..' mPQ aE]O 11] 167.0 Et 10 r. EIIERA =IA E..■. .OmE ••f. 1Y ... ■. EAR. SOL IIL.. NIIL:• 1......... 1116. A.S. 11L-.HI. 1 5 6 A 6 CS ■1'•4. ES 1'V ■1:111. IICEIL ■ ■PRI II111• A.S. IIIIII ■1 ■11111011 ■'• MA 11111 E 11310 .■■■E..E.E111 ■1111■IIP 1■I! • ■D ■• ■ ffT -U ■• INr ■. ■ • A.S. [HELL. 11• ■ 1 5 • A 4 311 EM 111' "L 1111: 16 •' ■l. ■■R111tlP' • I2uSI--R.SlI D ■ A.S. 10111■• ■■• 1 ■■EI1A • Ee ANNE 1 A I Wp,, C LEY EEE I! 111 ■IIP E• 1F 1 1' E1111i11■ ■ E Aq D1111 ■• ■■• ■ [BEEP 30 110 .■ A 68 SAV" SOEOIDDERA ARCERTIM E•nnnu 11N1E. ERE •'E ■IL M EREM E' ■ ■11E• EIN1 1:'•■ A.S. MEI[E'E ■• ■11 i'. ■E• IDIOM ■11111: EL 61 15 • EMRSAEEM ■• uuunlE:. 'EE■P••E. EREUIJERM •■■■E'•E. 1.11IIE' E.■1'•EI'O'■ A.S. ■EC ■111■ 311) 172 172 Vs [1100111M ■. • EE. ■ •N1E. umm■N =f.• SO m ID' SIASOPDITTI 1293DEEA, EE A.S. u90M 1N 15 3 =0:5 ORDITTA E• UM EA . 12ED5 --2.511 [III 1 A.S. ECISO 11 555 is 37 37 QV*,w EOMEf. ■1:0111!E' IIIIIEE. 12EEC2.5n E•E A.S. ■IEMOCE'• SIIDO 1,1100 1 5 2 SF =E31A SPEEOIBA 00 =0 SP 11111111 IIIOEIIO. ED5 P■ A.S. 111111E'EE'■ •IIIWII. ■E■•E111. 1'11118 E•••114 SOMIR E'E •11■■'■■ 120MPq 1'• A.S. 1IL•EI11E 6.0 1 6 A 6 BN 139MAREDA ■ ■ ■IIIIL• RIEIIIII' ■ SEIM 1I AROEHR C .III■ A.S. IIIIII■ ■ ■111• 1.0 111■ N • 111111111111111 •■IIIIIIRII ONEDASAIm EB 1.50.50 2MO EES■111■ ODAMAIREPS ■■ 1111 EIRE'[ ■I■ "8 515M M ■III■ A.S. 01 ■111■ 3.0 1 3 3 CH EFAMAE]REPS E■ 11PL CEREP[AOIACIPAON 51BEM M ■III■ A.S. IIN • E' 30 ■ 1 10 14 CV ' 0 ■0. • E'. • ■VEER E. AEEIAEM PAESI IEMA ■■ ■1111 A.S. Elm ■111■ 1 211 ■1008 ' PERMA ■CIO. 1. ACEEA= PAGM ICUEA E I III 10[11• ■ ■111■ CUE] ■111■ 27.0 EL .IIII EIS LL.EN.• EU■ RMOEEEIK EI I' 1111.• 111• . ■I' E" Ii 100m, VIII • A.S. Ill• ■III■ 167.0 Et 10 r. EIIERA =IA E..■. . EE. EEEE OA EA IIIIP IIP REEAEPAEM 100m, 2CIOA. A.S. EmSEILA " IIIO E • ■1 MA EEO[ 532.0 7.3 73 A 73 E-SP*,, SAEAEPAEM SAEAEPAOH I.0 01312PIODEQ SmO A.S. OSEIII■ E 11310 .■■■E..E.E111 I: E•• 8 SAIAEPAIM II1■ IIII .1011E SmO A.S. ■ D ■ ■f. (1 E 1111• OSA Et IG7 •uo'••E. MAEEI ■' EIIIEIEEC R EA ■• ■n = ■■8 PA EM =0 A.S. •Ill•EILIE Ee ANNE 1 A I Wp,, •. EIIIEIIEP'■EE.L. E. EIIIOEEB •e 111 1 ENI■ Aq 111111 E!EE'■ 1350 1 1,350 A Ip350 CIA EE1.fEEE1. III'■ EMEBO ROOOP ■EE 111 E[ 2TIZO 2.5000 1010 ■0111■ 1 2011 111■ N • 111111111111111 •■IIIIIIRII ONEDASAIm EB 1.50.50 2MO EES■111■ 0■■IOD EII01KA SEAERAPEI ■: E1 ■ 3EDO 011 ■III■ A 64,196 SOD IS.M EEC' ■' • •1013• ■l S.EDSEI A ■ ■f. Ellif. ■• SEEISPEES oft Elr I ■ 11111■1r' o. EDE 1r' E• unr E o • ■ I e ■ 004 CIM ■•' E ■ ■ ■■ [Rim ■r •IIEL • A.S. ■ IS ■III■ ■ 1 10 14 CV [IN CAR. =MADDEERESCREI30ER ■■■■ [Mau EI •IIEL ■ A.S. 1101[■ ■ .111E 1 1 211 ■1008 SPA030SEEPPER ■[ 20120 2=13 10[11• ■ ■111■ ■ 1 so .IIII EIS LL.EN.• EU■ ■ ■■nl.P ...111. ■. a 29MO 2.SE930 .O.L ■■■1u EZ I E r. EIIERA =IA E..■. P01E]0II-RA E: 20MO 2DOO 111.11E Timm IIOt■ IOC ■' IIP EE' 11111: • ■• ■ ■• ■III ■r 3.5011A. A.S. EIEEO■ TELL!■ 1310 1 11310 .■■■E..E.E111 •■■■E..E. Ois 111E0 EIEEIE•fE111■ •uo'••E. MAEEI •EE■ER•■. 125, Eno E■m•omE SEEEEDMRA A • u• 1uE ■• ■nuu o ' v" 1u• ■u ouu9E' E[ m ■ 2.50013 ■ e ,■ 1 .■ A 68 SAV" SOEOIDDERA ARCERTIM E•nnnu u'•EC •1m OM 0ELIMI ' E: 1.2ER.20 2.5030 mmf mnf 150 1 150 EMRSAEEM ■• uuunlE:. IACAEA E E. 2E12O 2.5000 mm 172 1 172 172 Vs [1100111M ■. • EE. ■ CTA033 CmREEM ■: 2111213 2EEiO nnlEl mn■ 176.21 1 263 PIS Into. MACREP IEIIL 0•■I■11o■ ■'OE9B■■EII11E. ■[ E 11311 111.11 ■0111■ 6111 1 684 1VAs~ 1111111• IItEL 1ff16■■••III ■■•-EE'■•■■fEll[II f[ f ■11f 111111■ ■IIII■ E■ 1 2011 111■ N • 111111111111111 •■IIIIIIRII ONEDASAIm EB 1.50.50 2MO EES■111■ GRASSES 16001 1 . f 05 A 64,196 SOD IS.M EEC' ■' • •1013• ■l S.EDSEI A ■ ■f. Ellif. ■• SEEISPEES oft Elr I ■ 11111■1r' o. EDE 1r' E• unr E o • ■ I e ■ off 0 uEnunnnP EE. PAEIN ■f ■■ E' • Eu. R.1n1r R o ' mne. 00 1. u■nunnnr o. OZ 011 0.8 = . E1: e E 3 -MULCH FORM SAUCER WITH 3- CONTINUOUS EARTHEN RIM AROUND PLANTING HOLE PUNTING PIT DEPTH SHALL BE 4.41' GREATER THAN ROOT BALL PLANTING PIT WIDTH SHALL BE TWICE THE DAAETER FOR ROOT BALLS T AND UNDER OR S LARGER IN DIAMETER FOR ROOT BALA OVER Z. BACK FILL AROUND ROOT BALL WITH STANDARDPLANTNGNIX ELIMINATEAiR POOD:'TS. PLACE TOP OF ROOT BALL 2•ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PLACEROOTB ATBOTTOMOFPLANnNGPIT SHRUB /GROUNDCOVER PLANTING DETAIL Af/5 i Y T Tt T� l„ • r•,.1����. r,,.lr I tryl LARGE TREE PLANTING DETAIL Af/S L III 3- MULCH FORM MUmi WITH 4'b• CONTINUOUS EARTHEN RIM AROUND PLANTING HOLE 2Bt4•KN• WOOD STAID: RB44IIlQif 3' ABDVEGRADE ra ROOT BARRIER DETAIL PLAN WEIV All ROOT BARRIER DETAIL ,t TREE PROTECTION DETAIL PLAN VIEIV ATM TREE PROTECTION DETAIL SECITON VIEN ,v6- 2. AU-RODT BOARDS SHALL BEA WKWUM RIOM 2. ALL ROOT DIARIES SHALL K AMNIMU14 HRQMAIIS� 4. MINIMUM M' DEffl, API'RDOED l =-- - C11 Is _a Landscape Architects Land Planners Environmental Consultants 1934 Commerce Lane Suite 1 Jupiter, Florida 33458 561.747.6336 - Fax 747.1377 www.cotleurhearing.com Lic# LC- C000239 `Fa ca ® LL O Ln �Ic �vU V U fu (� m /f V W v DESIGNED DEH DRAWN RW APPROVED JOB NUMBER DEH 12-1107 DATE 12 -17 -12 REVISIONS 01 -2313 03 -16-13 0426 -13 �r ROOT BARRIER DETAIL PLAN WEIV All ROOT BARRIER DETAIL ,t TREE PROTECTION DETAIL PLAN VIEIV ATM TREE PROTECTION DETAIL SECITON VIEN ,v6- 2. AU-RODT BOARDS SHALL BEA WKWUM RIOM 2. ALL ROOT DIARIES SHALL K AMNIMU14 HRQMAIIS� 4. MINIMUM M' DEffl, API'RDOED l =-- - C11 Is _a Landscape Architects Land Planners Environmental Consultants 1934 Commerce Lane Suite 1 Jupiter, Florida 33458 561.747.6336 - Fax 747.1377 www.cotleurhearing.com Lic# LC- C000239 `Fa ca ® LL O Ln �Ic �vU V U fu (� m /f V W v DESIGNED DEH DRAWN RW APPROVED JOB NUMBER DEH 12-1107 DATE 12 -17 -12 REVISIONS 01 -2313 03 -16-13 0426 -13 a a.m. LP.DWD SHEET 3 DP 3 C OOTLEURBHEAAIAL INC. m..ddwwyfiqy, I. P=o•VHIm.6xe.dm Mm Ie vMH•4arire mmtlMP�io�! M4+nvM1n..11q Mhtlre VtlLllPm4bry molLmmm.mwn wssT AREA CAL CUM UOMS I CATEGORY TOTAL SITE PERVIOUS IMPERVIOUS OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPE SOD PROPERTY BOUNDARY 448,819.99 12.17.12 REVISIONS 01 -2313 BUILDING 86,935.41 SIDEWALK, PLAZA 21,839.54 VEHICULAR USEAREA 157,682.78 RECREATIONAL USE 26,410.49 26,410.49 UTILITY EASEMENTS 29,09247 29,092.47 INTERIOR GREEN SPACEAND BUFFERS 111,638.78 111,638.78 111,638.78 RETENTION AREA AND LAKE 15,222.31 15,222.31 $OD (Mo. 40% OF "OPEN SPACE LANDSCAPE "I 63,434.43 TOTAL 1 448,819.99 1 182,364.05 1 266,457.73 I 182,364.05 1 111,638.78 63,434.43 MAC= LLQ555.51 AREA CALCULATIONS UNDER BY 1.79 SF DUE TO HUMAN CAD OPERATOR ERROR. EIIII 1Cj771712 I'. i.. AV dF • Landscape Architects Land Planners Environmental Consultants 1934 Commerce Lane Suite 1 Jupiter, Florida 33458 561.747.6336 • Fax 747.1377 www.cotleurheadng.00m Lic# LC- C000239 SW J\ LL ® U) fu rvwU U N c\� E V fQ v 4 Q DESIGNED DEH DRAWN RW APPROVED DEH JOB NUMBER 12-1107 DATE 12.17.12 REVISIONS 01 -2313 03 -16-13 0426-13 SHEET 1 OF I 00DJREEvIR &HEWNG,iNC. mmimbeuedbem�amei pqw� q pr,ra m wiug wm m. came. e,ereamy moimYemwramnem�me. ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN SITE LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE FIXTURE DESIGNATION UFACTURER CATALOG NO. MOUNT 1. (1)2' CONDUIT FOR BRIGHT HOUSE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A 17'X30'%24' PULL BOX AT VOLTS REMARKS NO. ATTS TYPE St COOPER GSM- A"(X- MPMTdVTF'G POLE I 1 I 40U I MP400111f 1 277 12,P It S2 COOPER (2)GSW Md MPAMT- PG POLE 1 2 1 4W I Nit 1 277 1241 POLE TENON GROUNDED INTERNAL OF POLE VIA GROUNDING CLAMP US132TIl -H PRESTRESSED CONCRETE POLE EPA CAPACITY = 22.8 WIND SPEED =150 MPH Vult EXPOSURE'* 12 GUST FACTOR 2010 FBC 1509 81819 ASCE 7 -10 RISK CATEGORY II LOAD FACTOR 1.3 MINIMUM BREAK STRENGTH =2,4W# CONCRETE= 6,500Ibs@28 DAYS POLE WEIGHT =Z220 LBS GROUND WIRE =#6 STR. COPPER STRAND= .500' @TO% ULTIMATE TENON=2 3/8' OD X 5' HEIGHT COLOR = NATURAL CONCRETE THIS POLE WITH THE 4.3 EPA ATTACHED EMBEDDED INTO SOILS WITH AN ALLOWABLE PASSIVE PRESSURE OF 30OPCF IS STRUCTURALLY ADEQUATE TO RESIST THE LOCAL WIND SPEEDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY PER THE 2010 FBC 1608, 1819 TAPERED CORE TO SERVE AS (POWER) RACEWAY TO FEED LIGHTS 5'X2 3180 DO TENON 242 HAND HOLE 9B' FROM BUTT 18' I1 18' ® — INLET6'60FROM V , BASE CORE 11.15 BACKFILL AND COMPACT IN 8' LIFTS TO 100% SEAL INLET PRIOR TO BACK FILLING TIP TIP RGD CONSULTING ENGINEERS .VrcNMCnt I E IC?0.1uL I PLUMB ING I FIRE Pn0rz=ON I ST4ArnJRAI .r „.mAcneinoen.Cum .ui,o IN Fro usA 1232 INDIANTOWN F.D. SORB 1W. RUTIMR. PL 33158 15611 763-0165 321 W ULIMILRAFAU(O ROROAP.ENO.T 812 EtECiRlfll ENGINEER CERfOFAU1N 5151 GATE 3.18.2013 O 06 ao 14 Lo t` .-i h c� n O � O � > P. a� AS: � r Nit O C> ro v P a d 3 O O 00 U L J LL O L > C E U Cu o (D =� Cl 0 ce) f0 '^ a) U) m A2 E CIO 'wrW 1..V commission 212076 date: 12-17 -2012 revision date no. © 03/15/13 drawing copyright 2012 me coureNrs or rnese uocuuexrs, Mot tW EDF me DesIGN PRe COPYRIGHT® A4D PROPwerAFY. me PRLnIIFLTSn41 use EN Wf AveNUeB AvNUBIero PRDf[Cf D Y IN WRITINNRIGHT. PNl LS[NOT NRNOR@D IN G BYTHE ARGHIIEGT Is PROHI&I83. ELECTRICAL NOTES 1. (1)2' CONDUIT FOR BRIGHT HOUSE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A 17'X30'%24' PULL BOX AT ALL 90 DEGREE BENDS FOR EACH CONDUIT. THE CONDUITAT THE ROADWAY SHALL TERMINATE IN A 24'%38'X24' PULL BOX. CONDUIT SHALL BE ROUTED TO THE MAIN IT ROOM INSIDE THE BUILDING. 2. EXISTING SITE LIGHTING CIRCUITS CURRENTLY TERMINATED IN THIS LOCATION; CIRCUITS SHALL BE EXTENDED TO PANEL HSB, CIRCUITS HSB48M, HSB -32G4, HSB-3613B, AND HSBd0142. ALL EXISTING SITE LIGHTING POLES SHALL REMAIN OPERABLE. 3. GENERAL NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SURVEY THE EXISTING SITE LIGHT FIXTURES ATTHE SITE. ALL SITE LIGHT FIXTURES MOUNTED ON POLES SHALL REMAIN; IF IT OBSERVED THAT ANY OF THE SITE LIGHT FUTURES ARE DAMAGED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE WITH NEW MATCHING THE SPECIFICATION OF THE NEW FIXTURES, THE ONLY MODIFICATION TO THE NEW SPECIFICATION FOR REPLACEMENTS WOULD BE VOLTAGE, ITAPPEARS EXISTING FIXTURES ARE 48OV. GONTRACTORTO CONFIRM PRIOR TO ORDER 4. EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO BE RELOCATED AS INDICATED. TENON GROUNDED INTERNAL OF POLE VIA GROUNDING CLAMP US132TIl -H PRESTRESSED CONCRETE POLE EPA CAPACITY = 22.8 WIND SPEED =150 MPH Vult EXPOSURE'* 12 GUST FACTOR 2010 FBC 1509 81819 ASCE 7 -10 RISK CATEGORY II LOAD FACTOR 1.3 MINIMUM BREAK STRENGTH =2,4W# CONCRETE= 6,500Ibs@28 DAYS POLE WEIGHT =Z220 LBS GROUND WIRE =#6 STR. COPPER STRAND= .500' @TO% ULTIMATE TENON=2 3/8' OD X 5' HEIGHT COLOR = NATURAL CONCRETE THIS POLE WITH THE 4.3 EPA ATTACHED EMBEDDED INTO SOILS WITH AN ALLOWABLE PASSIVE PRESSURE OF 30OPCF IS STRUCTURALLY ADEQUATE TO RESIST THE LOCAL WIND SPEEDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY PER THE 2010 FBC 1608, 1819 TAPERED CORE TO SERVE AS (POWER) RACEWAY TO FEED LIGHTS 5'X2 3180 DO TENON 242 HAND HOLE 9B' FROM BUTT 18' I1 18' ® — INLET6'60FROM V , BASE CORE 11.15 BACKFILL AND COMPACT IN 8' LIFTS TO 100% SEAL INLET PRIOR TO BACK FILLING TIP TIP RGD CONSULTING ENGINEERS .VrcNMCnt I E IC?0.1uL I PLUMB ING I FIRE Pn0rz=ON I ST4ArnJRAI .r „.mAcneinoen.Cum .ui,o IN Fro usA 1232 INDIANTOWN F.D. SORB 1W. RUTIMR. PL 33158 15611 763-0165 321 W ULIMILRAFAU(O ROROAP.ENO.T 812 EtECiRlfll ENGINEER CERfOFAU1N 5151 GATE 3.18.2013 O 06 ao 14 Lo t` .-i h c� n O � O � > P. a� AS: � r Nit O C> ro v P a d 3 O O 00 U L J LL O L > C E U Cu o (D =� Cl 0 ce) f0 '^ a) U) m A2 E CIO 'wrW 1..V commission 212076 date: 12-17 -2012 revision date no. © 03/15/13 drawing copyright 2012 me coureNrs or rnese uocuuexrs, Mot tW EDF me DesIGN PRe COPYRIGHT® A4D PROPwerAFY. me PRLnIIFLTSn41 use EN Wf AveNUeB AvNUBIero PRDf[Cf D Y IN WRITINNRIGHT. PNl LS[NOT NRNOR@D IN G BYTHE ARGHIIEGT Is PROHI&I83. Ae(gEVN1O6 UI • LYdArm caz. uxoarz aoa swctue GIIB.. CfY6011ER'IfYIfS �' Lw - crcetsr lWlY£ AMC• mgerz oa. ¢m Ioox rx• sIN xtWxrt no•rwo rsi.- s<aMSU mIm a Llvrt V.. IOM WE w •mrAr L0.. R51I RW Le . twls2 emxa Lr . Lort Paf IS .lLER4.5WYEY OY. Y:A91E0 W . YWdE WIM.•IFM1141 YA1q 0.88•ffi9ll MFCP BOq( IF9�1 • IpIi1pN PIW 6E/OI LWRY 00WOKffiNi WIqT A PA- P8 Mi B]IM P". Na IoeAt:Mr R.0.M. • 0 -W-TAY "R-� KAI M rz w¢ 131.5 y w . vw Lurt Pa£ sw . sMrtAMr uuAMef M -swllPa+au rnfwo¢Mxeut stW . s *aaI LLY16f re . tMASC � N • lUirC lWt PUf N . y m o uE. • EfSFIM W . OLYO PLeE M . OON MNtY MLLE K: \UST\154242 \78- 135 \12 - 118 - 410 \12 - 118- 410.don 3/15/2013 8:04:23 AM xm Mr yy ,1 �P NO `+ OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY I= FILE ID.! D6. 2013.002589 XEX. 71 t THAT SAD PROPERTY SNAIL BE CONSIDERED • ONE ROT AND PARCEL OF LAD, AND THAT NO EX 41 RAT BOOK 55, PACE I60 • SOLD, TRASERRE0.0EVISED, OR ASSIGNED SEPARATELY E8.51 RAT BOOK 78, PILE 5S PARCEL OR LAD. • EX 61 COVENANTS • RESTRICTIONS • 1 EX 7) OR& 8273, PO.594 x • EX 8) OR& 96631 PC. 51St OAB. 12094. PC. 278 • EX 9) ORB. 9730. PG. 1751 ORB. 11613. PG. 514 ® EX DI OAR. 9733, PG. 13901 O.R.B. D225, PC. WI OA8. 10528. PG.533 ORB. 8940. P0.181M OA& 12038. PG. 1485 • OA2.20265a PC. 512 • EX ro CAL 22953, PC 1631 • EX 12) OR& 23099 P0. 351 • EX 5) OJM 16657, P& BE • EX 141 OR& 6318. PG. 583 • EX 5) OA& 6581, PG. 1614 • 1 EX 5) ORB. 3115, PG. 1716 XEX. 71 t THAT SAD PROPERTY SNAIL BE CONSIDERED AS ONE ROT AND PARCEL OF LAD, AND THAT NO PORTION OF SAID 0.01 AD PARCEL OF LAD SNAIL BE SOLD, TRASERRE0.0EVISED, OR ASSIGNED SEPARATELY EXCEPT N ITS ENTIRETY AS ONE PLOT OR PARCEL OR LAD. F TA'J=V7A4lelAi t THIS 6 A BOUNDARY SURVEY AS DEFINED N CHAPTER 5J-D.050,FLORDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. 2. SURVEY BASED ON THE PLAT OF P.CANATDWL COMMERCE PARK PLAT N0.2 3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION WAS FIIRNSIED BY CLIENT 4. BEARFO BASS1N88'3P4rW ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF MATT DRIVE 5. THE SUSECT PROPERTY LES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE &PER FLOOD NSRACE RATE YIP NO. IM210003 C, BATED JANUARY 6, MB 0. TOTAL AREA • 11.30 ACRES.MORE OR LESS. 7. EASEMENTS OR RESTRICTIONS SHOWN WERE FURNISHED BY OLD REPUBLIC NATDNA TITLE NSRACE COMPANY FUD FILE NUMBER' 06.2013.00 89 EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY N, 205 0 1:00 P11. 0. THIS 91MY FALLS WHTHN THE SUBURBAN CATEGORY AS CLASSIFIED N CHAPTER 5J•17B5E FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. ALL FELD•NEAS RED CONTROL MEASUREMENTS EXCEEDED THE ACCURACY REOIEEMENTS FOR TINS OLASSIFCATDN. 9. ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED ON N.G.V.D.OF 1929 D. THIS SURVEY 5 PREPARED ONLY FOR THE PARTIES LGTEO BELOW AND 6 NOT ASSIGNABLE. °> PREPARED FOR: HIATT SCHOOL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT,LLC \ °- NATIONAL COMPANY THE KOPELOWITOSTOW FI PA L•25u ` tLgCOPYPoprt 205 BY UOBERG LAD SURVEYAO.OD. -THE SKETCH OF SURVEY AND SURVEY REPORT COMPRISE THE COMPLETE SURVEY. so�2rn M ms SURVEY 6 NOT VALID UNLESS THE SKETCH AND REPORT ACCOMPANY EACH OTHER REPRODUCTIONS OF THIS SRVEY ARE NOT VALID WITHOUT THE ORICNA RAISED SEAL OF A FLORA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND HIPPER EMPLOYED BY LDBERG LAND SAKYNG. W. 'c r DATE OF DVEMBER 2IL2012 s UWcOmwom PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER 10' UTILITY EASEMENT 1 1 (O.R,B. 10197, PG. 720) >O Ii 11 /1' USIGNiF N EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE MANHOLE (TYP.) 10' FPL EASEMENT O.R.B. 10528, PG. 1533) II II BALLENISLES EXISTING CATCH BASIN (TYP.) O.R.B. 10225, PG. 1532) I € � II II I DR. PROPOSED 24' STOP BAR (2). "STOP° PROPOSED TWO (2) CARD f III 11 II I 12' S.U.A. UTILITY EASEM T I I ( PROPOSED 750 GAL. GREASE TRAP SIGNS (FACING EAST) & (2) DO NOT READING PEDESTALS I II (O.R.B. 12038, PG. 1486) e°y I PER S.U.A. REQUIREMENTS ENTER" SIGNS (FACING WEST) PROPOSED 6' BLACK VINYL CHAIN I € 11 I i, I L 12' D.E. 10' FPL EASEMENT LINK FENCE 0 SITE PERIMETER I ( If it i I (O.R.B. 11940, PG. 1810) ('IYP.) EXISTING SAN. MANHOLE 1 1 // N01027'190E 8_44.3 I Ed .c _ -� --- �- --- - --- ---- 30' 30' 1 AKE BLVD. w PROPOSED F.D.C. I III -- - "�- -• ------ 1�L__ - -__ s d �°"° M 2' «^ 224'R._ -•t iv 10 _-- - -__ -- - € 4w . II I I z w ~ � 150'R i 4;dY.� m� h - - - - - - - _ - - ,,,,. a1 I II E_--- __ - -_ -O'R. Cg o-- - - - -- - 1 - - - -- '- 1 II II 1 II II I EXISTING 6' C -900 '•r -�_ -- - ------- -_ -___ ( SAN. SERVICE zl 4 \ � U U ^y U U U U = = 11 11 c2 _ _� PROPOSED TYPE °D° CURB (IYPJ � � / II o EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE W/ EXFILTRATION TRENCH (TYP.) t PROPOSED CONCRETE WHEEL STOP ('TYP.) Z = O n n IT n n T I I EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 1 1 " I I = �^ I i 11 11 11 n n II 11 1 1 °_� I 1j I SECTION 15 TOWNSHIP 42S., RANGE 42E, 30' BUFFER STRIP & U.E. 1`+ 'B.5'' g• 2 = I EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING I I I _ I I + IIHI = - PROPOSED (2) BUILDING #2 / 1 -STORY 12' S.UA. UTILITY EASEMEN I m 1 LJI_IIT.ILJIJLJLJIJ 1 -J I € I I1 I (P.B. 55, PGS. 160 -161) /I 110'= ^n„ III = HANDICAP SIGN 26' -2" HIT. / 26,000 S.F. (O.R.B. 12038, PG. 1486) L I rll-It11T1f11- (F'TT' -117 I = =�I _LOCATION MAP PROPOSED 8"X6" TAPPING SLEEVE, ) F I II 1 { I `� = I PROPOSED 24" STOP BAR PROPOSED TYPE °D" CURB (TYP_ I I II II II I) II II II I I _ I 11 I I NOT TO SCALE 6" GATE VALVE, 60 D.D.C.VA ffi T I €I = I I _ & "STOP" SIGN I 1€ 1 I I 10' FPL EASEMENT 6" D.I.P. FIRE LINE I ( $ I I I > �' I PROPOSED BIKE RACK - °� = I EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE u II�Y���,' 10' FPL EASEMENT U U U (1 _ i I I II 11 I _ EXISTING FIRE HYDRANTS (O.R.B. 11940, PG. 1810) = --I I I I (O.R.B. 10528, PG. 1533) !r EXISTING 8` P.V.C. SEWER I I I I y 11 I EXISTING STORM INLET (TYP.) I I 1 0_R.B. 10225, PG. 1532) EXISTING 8" D.I.P. W.M. I-I PROPOSED BRICK PAVERS (TYP.) __� jtu € 1 1 I N'c WATER MANAGEMENT TRACT °C' I I II I€ I I _ 1 - - L I "LL },$ I II 1 SED PGA RESORT COMMUNITY PLAT OF CYPRESS POINT I 1 I ?' .9„a I _ _ n II n n n n n I I - - - - -- [_] 1- TT T =_�� - TI f - -- ^ II 40 20 0 40 80 P.B. 42, PGS. 156-1 58 1 I II € U7 I a I1llI'I ° ��' - ® m I m ® T - - - I — - -H- IHI -N-- N--{I -n- r- 1€ 1. I I PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL ARROW (TYP.) 1 I I € I � .n. - �� 1+m�� .�\ ,� I Lil "-I1 - �-)I'-� y •p 11 / — .— SCALE IN FEET EXISTING 8" D.I.P. W.M. �® o- . - --1�1 \ - II- n"- II'II -7F�- it -IF'i I — — 1 11'il� IOROPOSED CONCRETE FLUME P -- _ ly — I e10 2 1 € I — — .0 �U JL']L_If .u.._ U JL uJL ,tom^ — _ _d «+ II II II 11 II II 11 11 I f` ci I I .1 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK _ _ . 4 1LU -11- UJI -0 ^" U U U U U U i U � _ 1 11 Q PROPOSED GATE (TYP -) N I I III I _ T` =`-'- /ry - a. +'.% i� ,p s a - I 1< I I I q 1e \ "P•) I —N —��11 pp'J�"� y®�"— _•'°'� y :° .el° Bey 4w •,` I I II -0% — — — — 1 I I II €I 1 I ^ - 1"i , om aoy 5 tr, I — — — PROPOSED STORM SEWER �®® a-- _ - ° ° ' o� 1 R„ a s " I I AND CATCH BASIN oll I I I 1 # a tr, t, I I 1 nll € I III I I f - - _ - _ m - - - - 4 ( ^ .$ /reov ° Fl I 0' U.E. -161 55, EXISTING GATE VALVE (TYP.) / 1b I III I L €J = m r- PGS. 160 -161) �./W� DIRECTION OF FLOW z I �I sj EXISTING BOLLARD -NP. I_ r�"-r % °�a$` s ;. 97• I 1 =-� z II II I PROPOSED HINGED -^Mh- DIRECTION OF SWALE EXISTING 10 "XS" REDUCER a 1 (TO BE REMOVED) I I I (I "11 1 o-o- s% € - I s 11 GATE. SWINGS X"1..H P PROPOSED HIGH POINT I I ° a `, 1=I 11 -r' r- a�1 1 t ' ,as , .. - I I = --I I �`' it I INWARD (TYP.) __ I II I II I = PROPOSED 6' BLACK VINYL ' +11I €_� I I I = =_ ^° •+ e 1 I PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT m z 1 CHAIN LINK FENCE q m a a ,' I \\ I PROPOSED CONCRETE I I I €1 S- sr III 101 PROPOSED EQUIPMENT PADS W PROPOSED 4' FENCE - I PROPOSED BRICK PAVERS II (� - a _ _ -= 5 BLACK VINYL FENCE'- -d 1 1 I E I€ I = I "y I _ 9e j 1 -1 I u}€ III 11 PROPOSED CONCRETE oo a o PROPOSED DETECTABLE WARNING �' I II I SAWCUT &REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE, PROPOSED 6' BLACK VINYL I l - - 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK _ I €I I I WHEEL STOP o 0 0 0 I 1 III 120'R. AS CONCRETE SHOWN Pte.) ASPHALT, WALLS, ETC. CHAIN LINK FENCE �) IIC �) °000OO SURFACE PROPOSED TYPE 'D' CURB (T'P.) o- R CR T10N s +l •ly,. 9`� y,€ 11k II/ %� SAWCUT &REMOVE IXISTING 0 \� 20. -" �I €1 rI 11g I I PROPOSED DIRECTIONAL IMPROVEMENTS a ,z 10'R. ` 3 - I I +, ro= ARROW P I 3 I 4 4 BUILDING 1 / 1 -STORY 33' -4" HT. PROPOSED STEPS I :, - 5' I == I m€ II I I ) PROPOSED IXFILTRATION TRENCH PROPOSED TYPE "D" CURB (TYP.) I @ \ \ \ v 61,317 S.F. / F.F.E. T.B.D. _6 R• _ \ PROPOSED HANDICAP RAMP �- (ACTUAL LENGTH & SIZE TO BE \ \ "I = �',,� y EXISTING 6" D.I.P. FIRE 9 °_� /� SAWCUT &REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT, 15' ROSOAEDUTILITY EASEMENT ) I u1l I ` __ 'EXISTING 2' WATER SE1iVICE �'.. -... III = -� 1 11 W/ DETECTABLE WARNING DETERMINED DURING FINAL DESIGN) _ I I 11 STRIP S ACCORDANCE W/ 22' D.E. & U.E. (P.B. 55, € � \ \ o M - - -- PROPOSED (3) AGO)P8O, ES 1486) I� N I "I c =�� == EXISTING �STO BAR &^ "STOP" SIG q 1 j = -� z li � I I A.DA SPECIFICATIONS y SEWER SERVICE W/ CLEAN -OUT CURB, ETC. AS SHOWN (TYP) I I I_ m I I I I I I I I (TN'•) "^ O� �� rq,�,,"" PROPOSED BENCH & I I I I FIRE HYDRANT W/ GATE VALVE PGS. 160 -161) 1 I I I \\ ,�� / vvo v.l'a�'_{t' -i� H CAN TYP. ( _ I €I I II II/ I PROPOSED 12" CONCRETE + I I \ \ \__ -_ -_ �°� ,�� -o U> q.3v- ^'T�" v -''°— _ �" ( I = I f PROPOSED SANRARY SEWER / 1 o"i II I € I I^ \ %l �\ \ a 0. °- a ?o - '° `rte "I Ill c I -- 1 . 19.5 - I = I II II II I HEADER CURB (TYP.) LINE & MANHOLE WATER SERVICE & R.P.Z. U U Al iF► U U U .:z U U U U -U c �O UPI U U •U - U U app.. � •e%-- .o- e _ _ I I 11 I SERVICE TSINGLE �R TER EXITING 10 D.I.P. W.M. INSTALLATION DETAIL.) 5I `Q1TI }°- v ° — € I II EXISTING SIGN PROPOSED BENCH &TRASH CAN o- o- .,n n L EXISTING E.O.W. — — — — — € II II If If II II II II II II x,11 II II It 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 n n n n U n U n n I U p n ° y p U € n n n n n n U� °"� I 1 I I (TO REMAIN) ®0 ( ) a Br oTHERs Id ��JLJI_u _a -if— L{JJ uJ_Y���_�y� ��JL LJ J� L� "' I� I� II II II II II II F (tr 911 11 11 11 11 11 11 If III6 {1 II II Ii�ll II II Tj I, ?I II EXISTING T.O.B. — — -&&fi Ile* _IL 1L ..11_IL/.L Jl JI =1L TL JI_IL UL�zJL JI,�1L Jl JI_1�JL JI_1L I I \I� 11 _ PROPOSED BIKE RACK MATCH LINE THIS SHEET I� \�� �.— — _ _ _ � — — ` — "` — — — — — � (Br OTHERS) �� -_�— _ , .,, .- _ ,«— "„-- ,.„ —,,,, �..— :v — ", ", — — — — — 11 I ( ®_ PROPOSED 24" STOP BAR & (�y" =50') — '— _-- '- -..— �(s II "STOP" SIGN o II a II III _ _ -- v-_ - _ M_— m' `� m'� `o,Y- — _ - -__— _ I ^. � — -- _ -- —m— GE PIPE IIt S II III I BUFFER EASEMENT °— — — - - - -'— _ -- -- — _ _ _ _ _ =v = - -- - -_ I _ _ .m ,,, 4„ ,m s I O EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE PG. 1390 --- - - -- -- — — — -I— -•+� EXISTING WATER MAIN --- - - - -__ --------- - - - - - -- — —� ---- --- - -- _ —'�- 12' S.U.A. UTILITY EASEMENT Ila U I LI -- - - - -------------- S02'38'S4°W�844sy ° - - _ _ — --- - - -- -- ICI II I II It I I _ _ - -- - - -_-- _ _ - _ _ 1, ap (O.R.B. _ 486) —v„— EXISTING SEWER MAIN % __---------_'-____----- IT EXISTING T "O.B. 15' WATER MANAGEMENT EASEMENT o- - - - - - -- _ �° \ 30' 30 a — — — — — _� EXISTING FORCE MAJN EXISTING E.O.W. N FAVOR OF N.P.B.C.LD. (P.B. 55, PROPOSED GATE -- - - - - -_ �e s "�e NI a I Pcs. 160-161) - - -- ------- - - - -`� - - - - -- �'' € I� 11 — — — — — — — — - qa I It I 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) EXISTING STORM DRAINAGE W/ EXFILTRATION TRENCH TYP.)II 22' UTILITY &WATER MANAGEMENT 4' I I Till MAINTENANCE EASEMENT (P.B. 55, CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS EXISTING 6" P.V.C. SAN. SERVICE I( € 11 11 I II a I # 1 PGS. 160 -161) RECREATIONAL PARK UNPLATTED) I 1 -,' I 1 0 11 ( EXISTING 8 "' P.V.C. SEWER I 1I I I I \ I ` 12' S.U.A. UTILITY EASEMENT I I I I I THIS DESIGN IS CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT 70 CHANGE BASED ON 11 a \ \ (O.R.B. 12038, PG. 1486) EXISTING t0" D.I.P. W.M. it 11 II ItI € II II I FINAL DESIGN. \ \ I I I, EXISTING D.D.C.V., WATER METER & R.P.Z. I I I I `1I \ \\ \ \\ \ li II Y J I III IY I EXISTING ENDWALL I III I�ti. f`j \ \ \ III %1 ! III II �N III Y It I U I I III 11 « \�\ � m �\; •�\ \ � ii a V I Iii II I €I I � I III I II/ I �� `mss �`.; \ �� ` � / u I I � i I €I '• II I %I a I \ \ \111IIlII i 1 II HIA1T RivE=-==---- - - - -__ � -_ - -- - -� ,� ,� III I =UT J I I I I �• - MATCH LINE THIS SHEET (1 ° =40') --- -_ ------- —_ - -- - - -- ° m I I I _ ATE OF � •�� __--11— _�____ - -� _�7 � I �I, ( }� °—_� /j741/f111111111AVV\``� °=a= a ° I II ___ -_ RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL I NOTE: CARS IN QUEUE OMITTED T( SHOW DIRECTIONAL ARROWS (TYP. ALL DIRECTIONAL ARROWS) MATCH EXISTING CROSSWALK & PED SIGNAL HIATT DRNEi� I r I I ' J- SITE HIATT DR. V CUP BLVD. SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 42S., RANGE 42E, LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE LEGEN PEDESTRIAN ROUTE O TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL CONES FOR TRAFFIC CONTROL DURING PEAK DROP -OFF /PICK -UP TIMES ONLY TRAINED STAFF MEMBER FOR FLOW CONTROL TEACHERS/TRAINED STAFF ASSISTING WITH STUDENT LOADING /UNLOADING ® PARENT CARS IN QUEUE (225 TOTAL) MINED STAFF SUMMARY 11 ERE: THEE DROP-0 AND PICK-UP PROCEDURE ASSISTING WITH LOADING AND UNLOADING OF CHILDREN WILL VARY FOLLOWING OPENING OF SCHOOL AND ASSESSMENT OF NEEDS 2/3 ASSIST CHILDREN; CONTROL THE FLOW AND MERGING OF THE EXITING 'PLATOON" OF 31 CARS FROM 3 LANES TO 2 LANES f4 STATE ING�H AEDD CROSSING GUARD ASSISTS CHILDREN f 5 STATE CERTIFIED CROSSING GUARD ASSISTS CHILDREN CROSSING HIATT OR. AT NORTHLAKE BLVD. EMEND SIDEWALK & INSTALLS I II j i / � CROSSWALK FOR CONTINUOUS I I � '• �CORtQ: ! `���� BIKERS AY FOR WALKERS & I I t �✓V//�lgnnn +l���\\` ANALYSiS\12096A01 sd:dwg, 4/2620131:19:2'/PM, Daniel ..... .. .. . . . .. . . i REVISIONS 1 1 °v .•', "• �. �,• ��+. �� mss. _ _ j .t r 1H - • � I • ��1 I I i II I I - r - 7 • SIC' ' . m1 - - - YAAV1'OCADPIIP81'1O1T1IMW .BbbdWsMbg&B ycbRomlMymLd.&42 613210 PKDEM 4 = Yt -Ry I r, M tit v f = -II- � o ❑ 1 II tlt a4 if a4 1 I � _ top .:,v 1 AIL SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 425., RANGE 42E. LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE N 60 30 0 60 120 SCALE IN FEET 1"=60' LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE IMPROVEMENT PLANS \12096(OI)S01- 3.dwg, 4715/2013 3:56:04 PM, Daniel INDEX OF SHEETS SHEET N0, DESCRIPTION 1 TITLE SHEET 2 -3 OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS I I I / I to — _ _ _ _ A - 6' SOLID WHITE B - 8" SOLID WHITE C - 127 SOLID WHITE D - 18" SOLID WHITE E - 24" SOLID WHITE F - 6" SKIP WHITE TYP. (10' -302) G - 6" SKIP WHITE TYP. (6' -10') H - 6" SKIP WHITE TYP. (2' -4') 1 - 6" SOLID YELLOW J - 18" SOLID YELLOW K - 6" DOUBLE YELLOW L - 6" SKIP YELLOW TYP. (10' -301) M - 6' SKIP YELLOW TYP. (6' -101 N - 6" SKIP YELLOW TYP. (2' -4') P - R.P.M. BI- DIRECTIONAL AMBER /AMBER R - F.D.P. WHITE S - F.D.P. YELLOW T - R.P.M. BI- DIRECTIONAL WHITE /RED U - R.P.M. BI- DIRECTIONAL RED/YELLOW NOTES - 1.) ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY TYPICAL DRAWING NO, T -P -10 -001. 2.) ALL SIGNS SHOWN ARE PROPOSED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.) F.D.P.'S SHALL BE SPACED 3' APART. WHITE SHALL BE USED. 20 10 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 1 " =20' SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 42S., RANGE 42E. LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE . o 1a. 1.) CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO COORDINATE ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATES, SUPPORT, RELOCATIONS AND NOTIFICATIONS REQUIRED WITH ALL APPLICABLE UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDES. Y:\AUTOCAD FILE =012 \12- 096\OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS\l2096(O1)S01- 3.8wg, 4/252013 3:55:51 PM, Daniel m�M --------------------- n n n n n n n n If n II n if II II n hnl II if n it u If n if n p II l II 11 11 11 11 II II _JL— JJ__11 —_II _ II__II if II n II II Il I! II II I II II I II I I � II II II II II II p n 11 ll__IL- 11__JJ _ IL_j 11 1 - -- --u X - /= m _ m —m_-4- II n n n n n n n n if if II 11 n it ii it IL II II II II II II II II 11 F I I m 11 n n II 11 II II r� —4— - -- I — -- — I I I I I I I I I I ' I I I I 111 / g I If — ---- - - - - -- �1vp T 9. le$ \ At os_ a \\ l )\ 1 rn m rn �rn —rn —m i ,per �j bb1 y— _! � - - ---- - 1--"" -' - -� - ---- ���-�� 36t, tam / r � � b - - - - - -- �-- � X49 — °— �--- - - - - -' da - -' _ 0 i ■ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING BROWARD , P" BEACH • #AZW RIVER ST. LUCE�A(ARI/N CONWIES 1- 800 -432 -4770 SMAW SWE I C4LL UNDERGROUND U71177ES AVARCAT/ON CENTER t 1 t _ oo97>i �...... T 9. le$ \ At os_ a \\ l )\ 1 rn m rn �rn —rn —m i ,per �j bb1 y— _! � - - ---- - 1--"" -' - -� - ---- ���-�� 36t, tam / r � � b - - - - - -- �-- � X49 — °— �--- - - - - -' da - -' _ 0 i ■ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING BROWARD , P" BEACH • #AZW RIVER ST. LUCE�A(ARI/N CONWIES 1- 800 -432 -4770 SMAW SWE I C4LL UNDERGROUND U71177ES AVARCAT/ON CENTER t 1 t _ oo97>i I I I I I L - - - ---7- / y� --- - - - - -- -tea q fl I Nov ALISTER BLVD. ---- - - - - -- _.Taal b - aqa d----- -- --- ---I' e- -- - ---�t� II l r, e III I I I I I I I 111 ppp I I I II l y II III I II Ol l II III I II III I II II II oil I h._ ll AI or I I Illl 7aI o oil I I [it I �i dl I I I Ji l l I "a, i I IIII I Itt III I I I I4 IIII Jill I i oil (I IIII l I � IIII I Jill I I l I I � i pll II. Jill I I nll I l I � III I I nli I 1 � IIII I I � I III I Y:IAUTOCAD FUXS120IM12 -096 \OFF -SITE IMPROVEMENT e "1 I ye 15 I<� °w 4252013 3:55:40 PM. Daniel I P' J m J Y O Z I I� I III 1 III I I� I I fl I III 11 I� I III I I I I i I I I ?I TRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND DEPTH OF ALL EXISTING PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY TS. R SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO LATE ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATES, SUPPORT, RELOCATIONS AND TIONS REQUIRED WITH ALL APPLICABLE UTILITY SERVICE PROVIDES. Kk — —— _7—_ - - - - -- _ w �7' — -_ • HIATT DR. H iT( YP J i II kl i_Itt�v I I I II q�a II I I I I I I I II Ij I II I I I I I I II I� II I I I I it I I I I I I I Il II ii i ICI I'. II I I !I II I Iw III oY, ,l I II I I I III 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING 6ROWARO • PAY mF " /NOAH RIVER Sr. WaE " UVNN =NnES MLMm 1 -800- 432 -4770 UNDE ROUND U TIES M077RWION CENTER w m SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 42S., RANGE 42E.I LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE STRIPING KEY A — 6" SOLID WHITE B — 8" SOLID WHITE C — 12" SOLID WHITE D — 18" SOLID WHITE E — 24" SOLID WHITE F — 6' SKIP WHIE TYP_ (10' -30D G — 6" SKIP WHITE TYP. (6' -106) H — 6" SKIP WHITE TYP. (2' -4') I — 6" SOLID YELLOW J — 18" SOLID YELLOW K — 6" DOUBLE YELLOW L — 6' SKIP YELLOW TYP. (10' -30') M — 6" SKIP YELLOW TYP. (6' -10') N — 6' SKIP YELLOW TYP. (2' -4') P — R.P.M. BI— DIRECTIONAL AMBER /AMBER R — F.D.P. WHITE S — F.D.P. YELLOW T — R.P.M. BI— DIRECTIONAL WHRE /RED U — R.P.M. BI— DIRECTIONAL RED/YELLOW 1) ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY TYPICAL DRAWING NO. T —P -10 -001. 2.) ALL SIGNS SHOWN ARE PROPOSED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.) F.D.P.'S SHALL BE SPACED 3' APART. WHITE SHALL BE USED. II I I I I � j I II II. II II I I III LI I � III ll I i I� II 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING 6ROWARO • PAY mF " /NOAH RIVER Sr. WaE " UVNN =NnES MLMm 1 -800- 432 -4770 UNDE ROUND U TIES M077RWION CENTER w m SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 42S., RANGE 42E.I LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE STRIPING KEY A — 6" SOLID WHITE B — 8" SOLID WHITE C — 12" SOLID WHITE D — 18" SOLID WHITE E — 24" SOLID WHITE F — 6' SKIP WHIE TYP_ (10' -30D G — 6" SKIP WHITE TYP. (6' -106) H — 6" SKIP WHITE TYP. (2' -4') I — 6" SOLID YELLOW J — 18" SOLID YELLOW K — 6" DOUBLE YELLOW L — 6' SKIP YELLOW TYP. (10' -30') M — 6" SKIP YELLOW TYP. (6' -10') N — 6' SKIP YELLOW TYP. (2' -4') P — R.P.M. BI— DIRECTIONAL AMBER /AMBER R — F.D.P. WHITE S — F.D.P. YELLOW T — R.P.M. BI— DIRECTIONAL WHRE /RED U — R.P.M. BI— DIRECTIONAL RED/YELLOW 1) ALL PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND REFLECTIVE PAVEMENT MARKERS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PALM BEACH COUNTY TYPICAL DRAWING NO. T —P -10 -001. 2.) ALL SIGNS SHOWN ARE PROPOSED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.) F.D.P.'S SHALL BE SPACED 3' APART. WHITE SHALL BE USED. REMOVE EXISONO WINOOW6 REMOVE NG EXISTING STOREFRONT TO BE ENLARGE OPENING FOR NEW 0008 STOREFRONT& INFBLOPENING REPLACED WI NEW STOREFRONT COLOR LEGEND OSHERWINWILLIAMS: SW 8385 DOVER WHITE OSHERWINWILLIAMS: 2 SW8100 PRACTICAL BEIGE OSNERWINWILLUMS: SW SAM DANA B. AO14' ,i� SHERWINWILLIAMS: . -F A SW 8880 HONEY BLUSH OSNERWI11OLLLIM& SINQMSPORTYBLUE Q 2 NO 5 1. ALL STOREFRONT SYSTEMS AN O WINDOW FRAMES ARETO BE BLUE MATCH EXISTING). — — W� —� - -� Ala ���� — _ - __ — slim RR9 ea l7B ea _ 99 ea 9® as J® DO ea l78 ee ® F 01i ea � DO as _ DE ee C1E ea f79 ea DO ea &9 i P7 @ ■N P7 9e A P9 i REMOVE EXISONO WINOOW6 REMOVE NG EXISTING STOREFRONT TO BE ENLARGE OPENING FOR NEW 0008 STOREFRONT& INFBLOPENING REPLACED WI NEW STOREFRONT COLOR LEGEND OSHERWINWILLIAMS: SW 8385 DOVER WHITE OSHERWINWILLIAMS: 2 SW8100 PRACTICAL BEIGE OSNERWINWILLUMS: SW SAM DANA B. AO14' ,i� SHERWINWILLIAMS: . -F A SW 8880 HONEY BLUSH OSNERWI11OLLLIM& SINQMSPORTYBLUE Q 2 NO 5 1. ALL STOREFRONT SYSTEMS AN O WINDOW FRAMES ARETO BE BLUE MATCH EXISTING). BMW STO EFRONfTO BE RBU.CFDWINEWSTO EFRONT 01 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING 1 8GAE'"`XT'V - ;- WEN RAISED PAWL CROWN, TYP. r NBN1PlIIIMD17BAD r RFAAS11101E/NINDINNIG �� NEW RAl9 ®PANIl &CROWN, TYP. /3PA° EL E 65 PG � { T.O. VM1L 02 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SCALE 1118' • 1'1r E78SRNGVMITEAILK rMXtl GAT3RI.00YMlIWT REIOYEEIOSTNGROOF rRB&OJEEXISIB1000gt REMONEEXLSFBD ROOF CANOPYTOREANKTYP. / TORBNK7W. ACCFSSIAOOER II &INALOPENIG E nm� ACCESS LADDER RBDOEEIOSRNOWALL 'R— MMEEBBTBIGROLLDONN L RENOVEEXZTINGLETAL &BOLLARD% %. DOOR&TI&&2CBUIE@t,TYP. BTAR&PAWNG,TYP. �L REICYEEIOSTNG LOADING RALPS FL Errs, alma 0 _ J^ CIF EL9TV EGSM FKGRADE 03 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION BUILDING 1 �91V'1'� 04 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SC LE 111° "'$ O v V b � S� m Cum m C4 u C a V co U U) Cf) L Ch J O j LL w cc ` N N = �� E N O _ 0. U � E C U M m Cu f!1 � .Cu a C cos 212076 date: 12 -17 -2012 no. 1 -29-13 3 -15 -13 0 drawing A3.1 copyright 2012 M GONE pli5 O[ M'Y PO4W GP9. IMNAIV[ OtM Oplp AX[ L9[ILpNm ANO �XOlIX[fAR1'. M AlLnriCT9WLV% ALL IIfX AV[NIIG! AVAIUpI[ 3p INt6f SVG tlO[I'IX(M. ANYIq[NOf AVRq® IN N1XRX6 R!M APp1R[R6 nGrxOXm. — Ala RBDOEEIOSRNOWALL 'R— MMEEBBTBIGROLLDONN L RENOVEEXZTINGLETAL &BOLLARD% %. DOOR&TI&&2CBUIE@t,TYP. BTAR&PAWNG,TYP. �L REICYEEIOSTNG LOADING RALPS FL Errs, alma 0 _ J^ CIF EL9TV EGSM FKGRADE 03 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION BUILDING 1 �91V'1'� 04 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SC LE 111° "'$ O v V b � S� m Cum m C4 u C a V co U U) Cf) L Ch J O j LL w cc ` N N = �� E N O _ 0. U � E C U M m Cu f!1 � .Cu a C cos 212076 date: 12 -17 -2012 no. 1 -29-13 3 -15 -13 0 drawing A3.1 copyright 2012 M GONE pli5 O[ M'Y PO4W GP9. IMNAIV[ OtM Oplp AX[ L9[ILpNm ANO �XOlIX[fAR1'. M AlLnriCT9WLV% ALL IIfX AV[NIIG! AVAIUpI[ 3p INt6f SVG tlO[I'IX(M. ANYIq[NOf AVRq® IN N1XRX6 R!M APp1R[R6 nGrxOXm. I S� REMAN ILL'f�86lAODER ROOF NSiLOFew I; 1: ACCESSLADDER EXISTINGWHIlEALUM. - EIBSTTNDAWM.DON!MOW CANOPY TO REMAIN, TYP. TOREAWN,TW. I L--curopENmmRNEwD= Mrs M �M ©i®M i ©E I M �L REMM EF711SRNG RENWE EOSRNGROLLDONN REMOVE EXISTING - REMOVE E%ISTIN METAL MR AIDE LOADItGRAIpS DOW&TRIMIR PER,TYP. WALL &BOLLMDS,TYP. STAIR &RAIING, TYP. 01 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION TITTTT T T\T! 1 SGTEDIR.4d EL 171'r .Sim T.O. WALL a1aBa . I4L R Fk GRADE 02 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SCALE WIF-1''4 EL nrr -Z 'i 'i R -i *-i w Fi o;. � REMOVE EXISTINGWINOOW& ENLARGE OPENING FOR NEW DOOR @irsim— T.OWALL a1oBa -� FN Ni 1 E1O511NGSTOREFRONTTOHE REPLACED Wi NEW STOWEFRONT 03 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SCALEV78'.ra FASMCWINEW.TYP. 04 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SCALE VIr =1a COLOR LEGEND OSHERWINWILLAMS: SW 8335 OOVER WHITE OSHERWIN WILLIAMS-. 2 SW 8100 PRACTICAL BEIGE OSHERWIN WILLIAMS, SW 800 BL d SHERWIN WILLAAIS: SW fi8B0 HONED BLUSH OSXERWINWILLIAMS: SW 8522 SPORTY BLUE Q 2 NO S: 1. ALL STOREFRONT SYSTEMS AND WINDOW FRAMES ARE TO BE BLUE (MATCH EXISTING). � h U � C � O eo o h m U oo °tee o �v m �m � n G iU-H .V y A 0. Y 3 0 Uco M L (h 1 > `L +y+ ca L N E U c� _ c0 o CL V it E r Mca co cn m N E ca a conuniRsion 212076 no. A 1 -29-13 & 3 -15 -13 A 0 0 0 d--ing A3.2 copyright 2012 THe — Or— oDLWCNni, IN-1 -orT —GN NQ CO1'r1�GNiro MD I'ROPnRNiV.ItK ARCHIRR SHVL Use •u urx nvauun •vuw�e ro nmcr sun cornannr. ury we uor unnae® Iu xxrnNG s me u�cnmcr � vRaraTeO. Ren&Tndk ALA REIPP - � �. - -��- m ml- �L REMM EF711SRNG RENWE EOSRNGROLLDONN REMOVE EXISTING - REMOVE E%ISTIN METAL MR AIDE LOADItGRAIpS DOW&TRIMIR PER,TYP. WALL &BOLLMDS,TYP. STAIR &RAIING, TYP. 01 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION TITTTT T T\T! 1 SGTEDIR.4d EL 171'r .Sim T.O. WALL a1aBa . I4L R Fk GRADE 02 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SCALE WIF-1''4 EL nrr -Z 'i 'i R -i *-i w Fi o;. � REMOVE EXISTINGWINOOW& ENLARGE OPENING FOR NEW DOOR @irsim— T.OWALL a1oBa -� FN Ni 1 E1O511NGSTOREFRONTTOHE REPLACED Wi NEW STOWEFRONT 03 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SCALEV78'.ra FASMCWINEW.TYP. 04 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SCALE VIr =1a COLOR LEGEND OSHERWINWILLAMS: SW 8335 OOVER WHITE OSHERWIN WILLIAMS-. 2 SW 8100 PRACTICAL BEIGE OSHERWIN WILLIAMS, SW 800 BL d SHERWIN WILLAAIS: SW fi8B0 HONED BLUSH OSXERWINWILLIAMS: SW 8522 SPORTY BLUE Q 2 NO S: 1. ALL STOREFRONT SYSTEMS AND WINDOW FRAMES ARE TO BE BLUE (MATCH EXISTING). � h U � C � O eo o h m U oo °tee o �v m �m � n G iU-H .V y A 0. Y 3 0 Uco M L (h 1 > `L +y+ ca L N E U c� _ c0 o CL V it E r Mca co cn m N E ca a conuniRsion 212076 no. A 1 -29-13 & 3 -15 -13 A 0 0 0 d--ing A3.2 copyright 2012 THe — Or— oDLWCNni, IN-1 -orT —GN NQ CO1'r1�GNiro MD I'ROPnRNiV.ItK ARCHIRR SHVL Use •u urx nvauun •vuw�e ro nmcr sun cornannr. ury we uor unnae® Iu xxrnNG s me u�cnmcr � vRaraTeO. Ren&Tndk ALA REIPP no. A 1 -29-13 & 3 -15 -13 A 0 0 0 d--ing A3.2 copyright 2012 THe — Or— oDLWCNni, IN-1 -orT —GN NQ CO1'r1�GNiro MD I'ROPnRNiV.ItK ARCHIRR SHVL Use •u urx nvauun •vuw�e ro nmcr sun cornannr. ury we uor unnae® Iu xxrnNG s me u�cnmcr � vRaraTeO. Ren&Tndk ALA REIPP r EWNSDODRSa WWDWSro REIAAPl,TYP. V A T.aWAu EXiaTWIDOWN POUTSM RELAW. TW. 05 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION BUILDING 2 ALE tRIr- '� EXISR VMffEALUN. 8.IaS GNOP`ITO RFAWNTYP. Effm Y T.awru . -- 01 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 06 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 02 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING 2 SCUVIV =1W BUn DL TG 2 SCALE+na =ra BOSONRV*MNISL E ATM DOYMSPOUBro Ex7SIP1G OOORSi EaSTM DOORS& EXLSONGADDRESS am" roRBa^rv. RaA W,TYP. WWOWSTORB11S {T'VP WR91oWSTO REWA. TYP, SIGN TO RBMN I I aflSY / ToBIWG I Q -� alms alma am E FK FLOOR 07 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION BUILDING 2 SCALE ItIr • 1'd 08 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION BUILDING 2 SCALE IRS' - 1'-Q` 03 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 2 SCLE111 (r=1'� 04 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 2 SG1E7 "°''1'`V w O 00 n a � n � gv . h v A ro m 'S b 0. 3 0 0 U � M 0 J > w � .H. Cu ` N m r Cc 'o 2 U L E C U (a fh N Cl) m T E 0 d commission 212076 revision date no. /1 1 -29 -13 A �A 1=" copyright 2012 Tf! coRrwr3 ar mOt wcuaens. iccuxBVe a Tne ogwx ne wnivanm IJIO PADrFlRAM. TK Mi111RGf FW11EC Au urx �vaw •vuue�ro nmxT v.�o cornerart. ,vm ux xor,wnn® IH wxmHC mme runrta-r Is neaxerlm. COLORLEGEND OWERWNWILLIAMS: SW 8365 OOVER WHITE OSHERWINWILLIAMS: Y SW 61DO PRACTICAL BEIGE SHERWINWILLIAMS: O 64 G SHERWIHWIL LaMS: O SW fiBBO HONEY BLUSH NOTES: 1. ALL STOREFRONT SYSTEMS AND WNDOW FRAMES ARE TO BE BLUE (MATCH E)aSRNGI. EXIW WDIEALUII cANDPrroREWAn.rm. � a . i EIOSTiNG WMfEAWY. CANOPYroRB VJKTYP. e-w4r atma MOM RRRWR 05 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION BUILDING 2 ALE tRIr- '� EXISR VMffEALUN. 8.IaS GNOP`ITO RFAWNTYP. Effm Y T.awru . -- 01 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION 06 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 02 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING 2 SCUVIV =1W BUn DL TG 2 SCALE+na =ra BOSONRV*MNISL E ATM DOYMSPOUBro Ex7SIP1G OOORSi EaSTM DOORS& EXLSONGADDRESS am" roRBa^rv. RaA W,TYP. WWOWSTORB11S {T'VP WR91oWSTO REWA. TYP, SIGN TO RBMN I I aflSY / ToBIWG I Q -� alms alma am E FK FLOOR 07 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION BUILDING 2 SCALE ItIr • 1'd 08 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION BUILDING 2 SCALE IRS' - 1'-Q` 03 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 2 SCLE111 (r=1'� 04 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 2 SG1E7 "°''1'`V w O 00 n a � n � gv . h v A ro m 'S b 0. 3 0 0 U � M 0 J > w � .H. Cu ` N m r Cc 'o 2 U L E C U (a fh N Cl) m T E 0 d commission 212076 revision date no. /1 1 -29 -13 A �A 1=" copyright 2012 Tf! coRrwr3 ar mOt wcuaens. iccuxBVe a Tne ogwx ne wnivanm IJIO PADrFlRAM. TK Mi111RGf FW11EC Au urx �vaw •vuue�ro nmxT v.�o cornerart. ,vm ux xor,wnn® IH wxmHC mme runrta-r Is neaxerlm. E7 s 3 s z z EXISTINGWINDOW EXISTING ALUM. STOREFRONT TO REMAIN, TYP. SYSTEM TO REMAIN TYPICAL NORTH & WEST SIDE'e^ ' Ol BUILDING I LV O .-i h w n o � O n � Nh _-C m�G °011 r b 0 � o u r .a F 3 G N Or i 00 U U) c�i L M J U. O ,N L C � \ 0 E U C6 _ rm 0 N V `0- U M (� m E a W conunission 212076 date: 12 -17 -2012 revision date no. Q 3 -15 -13 0 0 0 0 0 drawing 1.1 copyright 2012 THE CONTENTS OF ME5E DOCUMENT5. wcw51VE OF THE DESIGN AM COR GHTM AND FMFBJETPRY. THE ARCHITECT 5HAU V5E ALL LEGAL AVENUES AVAILABLE TO FROTOCT 5AIO COPYRIGHT. ANY USE NOT AUDIOKZ IN WRITING BY THE ARCHITECT 15 PROHIBITED. RenA Teralla AIA, REFP o�p / 4 INTERIOR TO BE REMODELED PER SEPARATE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS NEWALUM. STOREFRONTSYSTEM TYPICAL SOUTH & EAST SIDE NEW STOREFRONT ENTRY / / / / NEW STAIR & RAMP - 4 I J - \ INTERIOR TO BE REMODELED 1 PER SEPARATE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS � J EXIST. UMINUM CANOPY, TYP. J NEW A UM. STOREFRONT SYSTEM TYPIC L SOUTH &EAST SIDE T; l J l I J I J l J 2 NEW STAIR & RAMP 100' -0' 40W 224' -r 305 -0' Ol BUILDING I LV O .-i h w n o � O n � Nh _-C m�G °011 r b 0 � o u r .a F 3 G N Or i 00 U U) c�i L M J U. O ,N L C � \ 0 E U C6 _ rm 0 N V `0- U M (� m E a W conunission 212076 date: 12 -17 -2012 revision date no. Q 3 -15 -13 0 0 0 0 0 drawing 1.1 copyright 2012 THE CONTENTS OF ME5E DOCUMENT5. wcw51VE OF THE DESIGN AM COR GHTM AND FMFBJETPRY. THE ARCHITECT 5HAU V5E ALL LEGAL AVENUES AVAILABLE TO FROTOCT 5AIO COPYRIGHT. ANY USE NOT AUDIOKZ IN WRITING BY THE ARCHITECT 15 PROHIBITED. RenA Teralla AIA, REFP ELns9' WSBNG T.O.WAUL L EXIST. CANOPY ABOVE, TYP. 26P -0' ' FLOOR L BUILDING 2 E)NSTINGSCUPPER& DOWNSPOUTTO REMAIN, TYP. � ALUM. CANOPY BELOW, TYP. D.S. O.S. D.S. D.S. O.S. / D.S. D.S. D.S. O.S. n D.S. D.S.a11ir D.S. /D.s. EXISTING EXISRNGSCUPPER& J T.GWALL DOWNSPOUTTO REMAIN, TYP. 02 BUILDING 2 D.S. u D.S. D.S. D.S. E. 125.2 FXISBNG T.O.WAUL 101 & Wei ilk MAP OR lmc O.S. ALUM. CANOPY BELOW, TYP. NOTE: NO ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE USED. O O 0 Qo U U) ce) M J 0 ' > LL w Co L vi c EL 115.5 EL 0Z Bum EYJSBNG T.O.WALL T.O.WAIL °8 0 0 W 0 6 cD N > F R N V EXISTING ROOF EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN � TO REMAIN n F o y 0 0 0 0 m z z z u F a E1125.2 'u5 EL 125 -7 'uS EASI ING EXLSONG T.O. WALL T,O.WALL G o m�a a Nc I.J.. aim D.S. D.S.a11ir D.S. /D.s. EXISTING EXISRNGSCUPPER& J T.GWALL DOWNSPOUTTO REMAIN, TYP. 02 BUILDING 2 D.S. u D.S. D.S. D.S. E. 125.2 FXISBNG T.O.WAUL 101 & Wei ilk MAP OR lmc O.S. ALUM. CANOPY BELOW, TYP. NOTE: NO ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE USED. commission 212076 date: 12 -17 -2012 revision date no. 0 drawing Al .2 copyright 2012 mE CONTO T5 OE THEE DOCUMENT5. WCWSVE OF mC DESIGN ARE COPYRIGHTED AND PROPRIETARY. THE ARCHII5HAU D5E ALL EGAL AVENUES AVAIIABIE TO PP.OTECT 5AID COPYRIGHT. ANY U5E NOT AURIORI2ED IN WRITING DY RIC ARCHI I'15 PROHIBITED. O O 0 Qo U U) ce) M J 0 ' > LL w Co L vi c c E U o� GO a� = cD CL U M o� CIO N -y h 4 '('n^ v! G o m�a a Nc I.J.. aim n: � a E a commission 212076 date: 12 -17 -2012 revision date no. 0 drawing Al .2 copyright 2012 mE CONTO T5 OE THEE DOCUMENT5. WCWSVE OF mC DESIGN ARE COPYRIGHTED AND PROPRIETARY. THE ARCHII5HAU D5E ALL EGAL AVENUES AVAIIABIE TO PP.OTECT 5AID COPYRIGHT. ANY U5E NOT AURIORI2ED IN WRITING DY RIC ARCHI I'15 PROHIBITED. O O Qo U U) ce) M J 0 ' > LL w Co L vi c c E U o� GO a� = cD CL U M co CIO N Cfl '('n^ v! G m a Nc I.J.. commission 212076 date: 12 -17 -2012 revision date no. 0 drawing Al .2 copyright 2012 mE CONTO T5 OE THEE DOCUMENT5. WCWSVE OF mC DESIGN ARE COPYRIGHTED AND PROPRIETARY. THE ARCHII5HAU D5E ALL EGAL AVENUES AVAIIABIE TO PP.OTECT 5AID COPYRIGHT. ANY U5E NOT AURIORI2ED IN WRITING DY RIC ARCHI I'15 PROHIBITED. 01 BUILDING 1 O O 00 U) M L M J L ; ENLARGE OPENING FOR NEW DOOR STOREFRONT &INRLL OPENING %1 �uFwlr RAUn�I �\ �1 �Rrol ecc AUiF Awulur- �1 �\ 01 EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING I SCALE IN6' =1' -0• HFIUCAIEO ROOF ACCESS LADUER NEW RAISED PANEL& CROWN, TYP. of SEEMED I�r��_r���-r��-- ir�v�� N ,t 00 U O X00 0 = 7u O a mum �Alli J o >C EXSMG V L C Y pl TOWALL M EL Wl C� E 0 U _ /v lnY 0 v h E r.o.wALL O � cu O � (n d: E; i tp y �J ti v 212076 ox� date: 12 -17 -2012 am date - 5 b 0 — -- O O O - .r 01 O r©E`0�410 rO� � ® a _gyp_ 97ti �� �`I �� ' o� ®® ®o °�—• eD H !91B O9 Q� Q� LO �� 99 i .91 919 rr B91 ®® ®u® ��l® 02 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING I SCALE I /I =r-0 IXISTiNG WHITE ALUM. EXISTING ALUM. DOWNSPOUT REMOVE EXISTING ROOF REMOVE EXISTING DOOR REMOVE EXISTING ROOF Q1-NEW 12' BAND O `J REMOVE EXISTING WALL & BOLLARDS, TYP. REMOVE E%ISTING ROLL DOWN L REMOVE EXISTING METAL DOOR& TRUCK BUMPER TYR STAIR &RASING, TYP. Q REMOVE IXIGTING LOADING RAMPS UW NU FIN. GRADE 03 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION BUILDING I SCALEiHfi'=P -0' O11r NEW RAISED PANEL &CROWN, TYP. l--C I NEW 12' BAND l N ,t 00 U M � J o >C EXSMG V L C Y pl TOWALL M EL Wl C� E U _ /v lnY 0 v h E r.o.wALL O � cu O � (n d: E; i tp y �J ti v 212076 ox� date: 12 -17 -2012 am date - 5 b 1 -29 -13 — -- — - - .r rO� � ® a _gyp_ I M ' T .0 1,�� --- II ...III. { - - -- _ J. - - --R _ - _ �IS O OR - E_ - I II n 11 - _ _ _ _ _ _ D_ 96-0' h Q1-NEW 12' BAND O `J REMOVE EXISTING WALL & BOLLARDS, TYP. REMOVE E%ISTING ROLL DOWN L REMOVE EXISTING METAL DOOR& TRUCK BUMPER TYR STAIR &RASING, TYP. Q REMOVE IXIGTING LOADING RAMPS UW NU FIN. GRADE 03 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION BUILDING I SCALEiHfi'=P -0' O11r NEW RAISED PANEL &CROWN, TYP. l--C I NEW 12' BAND l U `J SYSTEM,TYP. `;f \J `ll v MECHANICAL SCREENING,TYP, U SYSTEM,TYP. COLOR LEGEND OSHERWIN WILUAIMS: SW 8385 DOVER WHRE OSHERWINWILLIAMS: 2 SW 6100 PRACTICAL BEIGE 3 SHERWINWILLIAMS: SW 6803 DANU el 4 SHERWINWILLW.15: SW 6E60 HONEY BLUSH OSHERWINWILUAMS: SW 8512 SPORTY BLUE 2 NO S. 1. a STOREFRONT SYBf EMS AND WINDOW FRAMES ARE TO BE BLUE (MATCH E]GSTING). 00 U M � J o >C 'V V L C Y pl TOWALL M EL Wl C� E U _ /v lnY 0 v h E O � cu O � (n d: E; i tp y �J ti v 212076 ox� date: 12 -17 -2012 am date 5 b 1 -29 -13 .r rO� � a _gyp_ I M ' .0 1,�� � II ...III. { U `J SYSTEM,TYP. `;f \J `ll v MECHANICAL SCREENING,TYP, U SYSTEM,TYP. COLOR LEGEND OSHERWIN WILUAIMS: SW 8385 DOVER WHRE OSHERWINWILLIAMS: 2 SW 6100 PRACTICAL BEIGE 3 SHERWINWILLIAMS: SW 6803 DANU el 4 SHERWINWILLW.15: SW 6E60 HONEY BLUSH OSHERWINWILUAMS: SW 8512 SPORTY BLUE 2 NO S. 1. a STOREFRONT SYBf EMS AND WINDOW FRAMES ARE TO BE BLUE (MATCH E]GSTING). 0 3 -15 -13 0 0 drawing A3.1 copyright 2012 mE CONTENTS Or THESE COLUMEMS, INCLU5IVE OFT rPE5IGN ARE OOP Gh7D AND PROPRIETARY. T EARCHITECT511AUUSE ALL IfGAL AVENUES AVAIt4BtE TO PRO= 5AID COPYRIGHT. ANY U5E NOT AURIOP.2® IN MnNG BY THE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. Rena Ter illa AIA, REFP 00 U M � J o >C 'V V L C Y pl YC w C� E U _ /v lnY 0 v h E O � cu O � (n d: E; i tp y �J ti v 212076 ox� date: 12 -17 -2012 am date 5 b 1 -29 -13 .r � a M 0 3 -15 -13 0 0 drawing A3.1 copyright 2012 mE CONTENTS Or THESE COLUMEMS, INCLU5IVE OFT rPE5IGN ARE OOP Gh7D AND PROPRIETARY. T EARCHITECT511AUUSE ALL IfGAL AVENUES AVAIt4BtE TO PRO= 5AID COPYRIGHT. ANY U5E NOT AURIOP.2® IN MnNG BY THE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. Rena Ter illa AIA, REFP 00 U M � J o >C U) �}� C\A L C Y r y Q C� E A `) _ /v lnY 0 v E CO cu cu N (n m E; commission 212076 date: 12 -17 -2012 revision date no. Q 1 -29 -13 0 3 -15 -13 0 0 drawing A3.1 copyright 2012 mE CONTENTS Or THESE COLUMEMS, INCLU5IVE OFT rPE5IGN ARE OOP Gh7D AND PROPRIETARY. T EARCHITECT511AUUSE ALL IfGAL AVENUES AVAIt4BtE TO PRO= 5AID COPYRIGHT. ANY U5E NOT AURIOP.2® IN MnNG BY THE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. Rena Ter illa AIA, REFP EM SSIIGNTOREMAIN� FT. ACCESS IADDERG ROOF II &IINNFFLLLOPENING DOOR ACCCESSLAD ERG ROOF BI -W — CUTOPENING FOR NEW DOOR Mal PROPOSED BUILDING SIGNAGE LOCATION, SEE DETAIL OWA12 E0. E . p NEW17BANO I 3 r1 - —r – NEW STAIR &RMUNG - RENAISSANCE CHARVER SCHOOL - ' 05 PROPOSED SURFACE MOUNTED SIGN MANUFACTURE & INSTALL SURFACE MOUNTED CHANNEL LETTER OF ALUM, CONSTRUCTION WIACRYLIC FACES &TRIM CAP FACE RETAINERS. ALL LETTERS WILL BE NEON ILLUMINATED. ALL TRANSFORMERS WILL BE CONCEALED BEHIND WALL. EA ALLOWABLE PROPDBED 9 COLORS: ■ LETTER FACES = WHITEACRYLIC W/ 3M #36M,11 BLUEVINYL OVERLAY SCALE,R=,'-0' REMOVE EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING ROLL DOWN REMOVEEXISTING �� LREMCVEEXISRNG METAL RN.GRA LOADINGRAMPS DOOR &TRUCK BUMPER TYP. WALL & BOLLARDS, TYP. STAIR &FAILING, TYP. 01 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SCALE 111I' =1'-' NEW RAISED PANEL & CROWN, TYP. NEW 17 BAND ��NG T pFJppO.WALL RAMP &RAILING L SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR NEW ALUM. STOREFRONT � Y 2 p p NEWSTAIR&RAILING NEW DOOR y EWACCESS RAMP &RAILING FIN CiMOE MECHANICAL SCREENING. TYP. SYSTEM, TYP. 02 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SrALE,I,li M.1 COLOR LEGEND 4C_T° ���4� 4���<O� OSHERWINW&lIAM3 SW 8386 DOVER WHRE ®fit— MURIVIS. 4� OSHERWIN SW 8100 PRACT,CALBEIGE MSTIN13 WHITE ALUM, CANOPYTOREMAIRTYP. EXISTING ALUM.00WNSPOUT TO REMAIN,- O SHERNIN W&WTAS: SW6803DANU BI -W — CUTOPENING FOR NEW DOOR Mal PROPOSED BUILDING SIGNAGE LOCATION, SEE DETAIL OWA12 E0. E . p NEW17BANO I 3 r1 - —r – NEW STAIR &RMUNG - RENAISSANCE CHARVER SCHOOL - ' 05 PROPOSED SURFACE MOUNTED SIGN MANUFACTURE & INSTALL SURFACE MOUNTED CHANNEL LETTER OF ALUM, CONSTRUCTION WIACRYLIC FACES &TRIM CAP FACE RETAINERS. ALL LETTERS WILL BE NEON ILLUMINATED. ALL TRANSFORMERS WILL BE CONCEALED BEHIND WALL. EA ALLOWABLE PROPDBED 9 COLORS: ■ LETTER FACES = WHITEACRYLIC W/ 3M #36M,11 BLUEVINYL OVERLAY SCALE,R=,'-0' REMOVE EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING ROLL DOWN REMOVEEXISTING �� LREMCVEEXISRNG METAL RN.GRA LOADINGRAMPS DOOR &TRUCK BUMPER TYP. WALL & BOLLARDS, TYP. STAIR &FAILING, TYP. 01 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SCALE 111I' =1'-' NEW RAISED PANEL & CROWN, TYP. NEW 17 BAND ��NG T pFJppO.WALL RAMP &RAILING L SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR NEW ALUM. STOREFRONT � Y 2 p p NEWSTAIR&RAILING NEW DOOR y EWACCESS RAMP &RAILING FIN CiMOE MECHANICAL SCREENING. TYP. SYSTEM, TYP. 02 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SrALE,I,li M.1 4C_T° ���4� 4���<O� ®fit— =� 4� mm �I/1 NOR _—�1C40 ■� Em ��1� \�■�� tl1l■1'���� \�ll� �� \�1I� i �I� ��0111m ��X 0011 Ell rol ral 91 I0111•r,Iu0111► Irrrz110 9 F-6 4, Or=- 0 11111 90 111 ■111■ Ary �� Z1111 Nc 9. . 1 11- -IIIIII._ 00 99 ►�e 911 11111111111111_ -1111- oo 99 511 1,_-111111 00 99 U I�PN� 3� ra'rall 11111 ■1111111, mm�c�IJ� ���• --III- 00 99 cc 6 a 00 99 � 00 99 �� 00 99 �,�((��� LLI' ����� ®lJ ®��ud�F ��F ������ ®IJ® � �����1� oo 99 ®b � l Lac 99 ,�9 ©lP ������ oo – 99 _ w����� oo � �� ®LIB �0 �9 �I �I�������� 0 9LIIJ� Leo 99 � II IIIIIIi! -s 1�( ' BI -W — CUTOPENING FOR NEW DOOR Mal PROPOSED BUILDING SIGNAGE LOCATION, SEE DETAIL OWA12 E0. E . p NEW17BANO I 3 r1 - —r – NEW STAIR &RMUNG - RENAISSANCE CHARVER SCHOOL - ' 05 PROPOSED SURFACE MOUNTED SIGN MANUFACTURE & INSTALL SURFACE MOUNTED CHANNEL LETTER OF ALUM, CONSTRUCTION WIACRYLIC FACES &TRIM CAP FACE RETAINERS. ALL LETTERS WILL BE NEON ILLUMINATED. ALL TRANSFORMERS WILL BE CONCEALED BEHIND WALL. EA ALLOWABLE PROPDBED 9 COLORS: ■ LETTER FACES = WHITEACRYLIC W/ 3M #36M,11 BLUEVINYL OVERLAY SCALE,R=,'-0' REMOVE EXISTING REMOVE EXISTING ROLL DOWN REMOVEEXISTING �� LREMCVEEXISRNG METAL RN.GRA LOADINGRAMPS DOOR &TRUCK BUMPER TYP. WALL & BOLLARDS, TYP. STAIR &FAILING, TYP. 01 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SCALE 111I' =1'-' NEW RAISED PANEL & CROWN, TYP. NEW 17 BAND ��NG T pFJppO.WALL RAMP &RAILING L SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR NEW ALUM. STOREFRONT � Y 2 p p NEWSTAIR&RAILING NEW DOOR y EWACCESS RAMP &RAILING FIN CiMOE MECHANICAL SCREENING. TYP. SYSTEM, TYP. 02 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SrALE,I,li ■ LETTER TRIM CAP =T BLUE JEWELITE ■ LETTER RETURNS= MATCH PMS#661 BLUE ■ LOGO FACE =WHITE ACRYLIC W/ 3M #3630-33 RED VINYL OVERLAY ■ LOGO TRIM CAP =FRED JEWELITE ■ LOGO RETURNS MATCH PMS #186 RED ■ LOGO FACE= WHITE ACRYLIC WI 3M 43630.26 GREEN VINYL OVERLAY ■ LOGO TRIM CAP 1- GREEN JEWELITE ■ LOGO RETURNS= MATCH PMS#341 GREEN REPNCEBLUEAWNING NEW 17 BAND LETTER NEON =6500 WHITE ELECTRICAL NOTES: -ALL MATERIALS AND FASTENERS TO MEET 3004A. -ALL ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS TO BE UL LISTED. - SIGNAGE TO BE GROUNDED PER NEC 600.7. 3 -SIGN TO BE MANUFACTURED PER NEC 600. -(1) 20 AMP CIRCUIT PER 16 AMP LOAD. -(1) VISIBLE EXTERIOR 20 AMP DISCONNECT PER SIGN. 2 - VOLTAGE: 120 i L REMOVE E3SRNG WNDOW & ENLARGE OPENING FOR NEW DOOR — ` EXISTING STOREFRONT TO BE REPLACEDW /NEW STOREFRONT 03 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SCALE111E =1' -0• r :. u. r► ' Y ►- �rl� M.1 4C_T° ���4� 4���<O� ®fit— =� 4� Lmm �I/1 NOR _—�1C40 ■� i ��1� \�■�� tl1l■1'���� \�ll� �� \�1I� i �I� ��0111m ��X 0011 Ell rol ral 91 I0111•r,Iu0111► Irrrz110 9 F-6 4, Or=- 0 11111 90 111 ■111■ Ary �� Z1111 Nc 9. . 1 11- -IIIIII._ 00 99 ►�e 911 11111111111111_ -1111- oo 99 511 1,_-111111 00 99 U I�PN� 3� ra'rall 11111 ■1111111, mm�c�IJ� ���• --III- 00 99 cc 6 a 00 99 � 00 99 �� 00 99 �,�((��� LLI' ����� ®lJ ®��ud�F ��F ������ ®IJ® � �����1� oo 99 ■ LETTER TRIM CAP =T BLUE JEWELITE ■ LETTER RETURNS= MATCH PMS#661 BLUE ■ LOGO FACE =WHITE ACRYLIC W/ 3M #3630-33 RED VINYL OVERLAY ■ LOGO TRIM CAP =FRED JEWELITE ■ LOGO RETURNS MATCH PMS #186 RED ■ LOGO FACE= WHITE ACRYLIC WI 3M 43630.26 GREEN VINYL OVERLAY ■ LOGO TRIM CAP 1- GREEN JEWELITE ■ LOGO RETURNS= MATCH PMS#341 GREEN REPNCEBLUEAWNING NEW 17 BAND LETTER NEON =6500 WHITE ELECTRICAL NOTES: -ALL MATERIALS AND FASTENERS TO MEET 3004A. -ALL ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS TO BE UL LISTED. - SIGNAGE TO BE GROUNDED PER NEC 600.7. 3 -SIGN TO BE MANUFACTURED PER NEC 600. -(1) 20 AMP CIRCUIT PER 16 AMP LOAD. -(1) VISIBLE EXTERIOR 20 AMP DISCONNECT PER SIGN. 2 - VOLTAGE: 120 i L REMOVE E3SRNG WNDOW & ENLARGE OPENING FOR NEW DOOR — ` EXISTING STOREFRONT TO BE REPLACEDW /NEW STOREFRONT 03 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SCALE111E =1' -0• r :. u. r► ' Y ►- �rl� M.1 4C_T° ���4� 4���<O� ®fit— =� 4� Lmm �I/1 NOR _—�1C40 ■� i ��1� \�■�� tl1l■1'���� \�ll� �� \�1I� i �I� ��0111m ��X 0011 Ell rol ral 91 I0111•r,Iu0111► Irrrz110 9 F-6 4, Or=- 0 ■ ■�rtio>•■r■�rz■� r���r■�rr■■r■�■�■ I�PN� 3� �� ec a �, ���• cc 6 a MN h 9. o0 99 — 00 99 �,�((��� LLI' ao 99 ljFQ ������ oo h 99 �� M oo 99 ®b � l Lac 99 ,�9 ©lP ������ oo – 99 _ w����� oo � �� ®LIB �0 �9 00 99 �I�������� 0 9LIIJ� Leo 99 � II IIIIIIi! -s 1�( ' 2 2 2 L REILACCWINEWATM NG I 04 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION BUILDING 1 SCALE 1116• =,'-0' 4 SHERWIN WIWAMS SW 8880 HONEY BLUSH OSHERWINW RTY.L SW 8522 SPORTYBWE 2 NO S: TALL STOREFRONT SYSTEMS AND WINDOW FRAMES ARE TO BE BLUE (MATCH LOOSTING). O m t\ h V Q � O CIO t` V/ icp o m a v o.� �Pm qm ~ry C C S-1 a v U00 U) M L CM J o if w M C' (, E C) a� _ CL M Cu m E CIO CIO ^L �W commission 212076 date: 12 -17 -2012 revision date 3 -15 -13 Q 4 -25 -13 LA IL IL drawing copyright 2012 TXE CONS 015 OFTXESE WCUMENTS, TXE OE51GN AR£ COPrWGHTHI ANO PROPPJETAu . TXf ARCXffER5XAIL USE ALL co AGf AVAIIAWETO PftOTEOf IN I -TING By ME my M.CXnER 5 PF.OXIBITED. EXISTING DOORS S WINDOWS TO REMAIN, TYP. � EXISTING DOWNSPOUTS TO RQAAIN, TYP.� rEXISTINGWHITEALUM. I CANOPY TO REMAIN, TYP. a 1zs -r ,,a 05 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION BUILDING 2 NEW RAISED ACCENT r NEWRASEDACCENT PANEL, TYP. / TILE, TYP. SCALE 1118' = TO' NEW RAISED ACCENT TILE, TYP. EXISTING WHITE ALUM. I CANOPYTO REMAIN, TYP. 06 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION BUILDING 2 EXISTING WHITE ALUM, CANOPYTOREMAIN,TYP. SCALE 1116' =1b' NEW RAISED ACCENT 1 NEW it BAND, TYP. PANEL, TYP. x.126 -r 0 TD.wAu EXISTING DOWNSPOUTS TO EXISRNGDOORS3 REMAIN, TYP. --\ WINDOWS TO REMAIN.TYP.� PLUM. N, TYP. FXTSII — T.DWALL O GV O 0 co E.1TUG T co co FROM mw=� EfISBNG ... o h MAR 1 w w C E U c'2 7t h o N =� ME o °O n U L c: CV) m N F N h cn T.O. WALL fl.1ara Ld P. U o��0 1.1.. �m 212076 I 12 -17 -2012 revision �I�I � � �o ~ r-1 � C EXISTMGWHTIE T4 OWAl�I. a E y CMIOPYTOREMAI EL iar-0' IW � B.1ar-0' Fx FlN. FLOOR �EtlS, iING,. 05 EXISTING EAST ELEVATION BUILDING 2 NEW RAISED ACCENT r NEWRASEDACCENT PANEL, TYP. / TILE, TYP. SCALE 1118' = TO' NEW RAISED ACCENT TILE, TYP. EXISTING WHITE ALUM. I CANOPYTO REMAIN, TYP. 06 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION BUILDING 2 EXISTING WHITE ALUM, CANOPYTOREMAIN,TYP. SCALE 1116' =1b' NEW RAISED ACCENT 1 NEW it BAND, TYP. PANEL, TYP. x.126 -r 0 TD.wAu EXISTING DOWNSPOUTS TO EXISRNGDOORS3 REMAIN, TYP. --\ WINDOWS TO REMAIN.TYP.� PLUM. N, TYP. FXTSII — T.DWALL O GV O 0 co E.1TUG T co co FROM mw=� J o h MAR 1 w w C E U c'2 EL tOB-0' WSTING h o N =� ME o °O n U L c: CV) m N F N h cn T.O. WALL fl.1ara Ld P. U o��0 1.1.. �m 212076 I 12 -17 -2012 revision � � �o ~ r-1 � C � a HN. nwN 07 EXISTING WEST ELEVATION BUILDING 2 - , OMAN �0'111���v� SCALE 1116'= I'-V NEW RAISED ACCENT TILE, TYP. BUILDING 2 SCALE 1116'=1'-0° PA ROCR a. 1166' 0 TO WALL COLOR LEGEND OSHERWIN WILLIAMS: BW6385 DOVER WHITE OSHERWIN WILLIAMS: SW 6100 PRACTICAL BEIGE OSHERWIN WILLIAMS: W,B: O W EYMS SH NOTES: 2 1. ALL STOREFRONT SYSTEMS AND WINDOW FRAMES ARE TO BE BLUE (MATCH EXISTING(. EL 19-T A Ol EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING 2 SCALE1116' =I' -W NEW 12- BAND, TYP. NEW RAISED ACCENT NEWRAISEDACCENT r TILE, TYP. / PANEL, TAP. EL 1263 ,l T.D.WALL EXISTING DOORS 6 WINDOWS TO REMAIN, TYP. Q 02 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING 2 SCALE 1116'= l'-T EXISTINGADDRESS SIGNTOREMAIN EL12B'r ,6 ....._.._ T.OTF.LO.WAl1� T.O.WALL 03 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION BUILDING 2 SCALE1116'=l'-V 1011 r NEW RAISED ACCENT P / PANEL, TYP. Fl Ilp.Y i (D 0 NA. 1 )Luxubmistillol 1 , P, i d: O GV O 0 co U T co co FROM mw=� J o h MAR 1 w w C E U c'2 h o N =� ME o °O n U L c: CV) m N F N h cn O Ld P. U (D 0 NA. 1 )Luxubmistillol 1 , P, i d: no. 0 1 -29 -13 Q 3 -15 -13 0 drawing 3.3 copyright 2012 THE CONTENT5 OFi, E5E OOCUMENT5. INCLU5IVC OF THE VE IGN ARE OOFYRIGNTEU AND PROPRIETARY THE ARCHNECT 5HALL U5E ALL LE DAL AVMUE5 AVAIIABt TO PROTECT 5AID COPYPJGI4. ANY U5E NOT MT10 RED N W TING BY TnE ARCHHUCT Is PROMDJ1 U. O GV O 0 co U T co co J o h w w C E U c'2 h o N =� o °O n U L c: CV) m N N h cn O Ld P. U o��0 1.1.. �m 212076 date: 12 -17 -2012 revision date �o ~ r-1 � C � a E y no. 0 1 -29 -13 Q 3 -15 -13 0 drawing 3.3 copyright 2012 THE CONTENT5 OFi, E5E OOCUMENT5. INCLU5IVC OF THE VE IGN ARE OOFYRIGNTEU AND PROPRIETARY THE ARCHNECT 5HALL U5E ALL LE DAL AVMUE5 AVAIIABt TO PROTECT 5AID COPYPJGI4. ANY U5E NOT MT10 RED N W TING BY TnE ARCHHUCT Is PROMDJ1 U. O O co U T co co J o L > TA L C E U c'2 o N =� a U L c: CV) m N N m cn E cu (Z 1.1.. commission 212076 date: 12 -17 -2012 revision date no. 0 1 -29 -13 Q 3 -15 -13 0 drawing 3.3 copyright 2012 THE CONTENT5 OFi, E5E OOCUMENT5. INCLU5IVC OF THE VE IGN ARE OOFYRIGNTEU AND PROPRIETARY THE ARCHNECT 5HALL U5E ALL LE DAL AVMUE5 AVAIIABt TO PROTECT 5AID COPYPJGI4. ANY U5E NOT MT10 RED N W TING BY TnE ARCHHUCT Is PROMDJ1 U. CLASSROOM 140 / DATA MF.= 3lacc.$a 13M ELEC.. m CLASSROOM 136 EC CORRIDOR 136 20 BM3F. =M� ® ® CLASSROOM SROOM M 134 20 �p M1 SF. =311 m 3ij . CLASSROOM CLASSROOM'0� ® SIK 135 M1 SF. =91000 20 500 BY13231000. ® FE Sg.° 149 M RESTROOM CLASSROOM 133 155 1308 JAN. CORK 601&F. _ a - alocc' CLASSR( 130C 001H 301 SF ' =31001 20 146 fiMSF. M1&F. = 31000. CLASSROOM _. 10 CBRWDOR 001G ® AASSROOM Mts,P131 =31 OW, .� M CLASSROOM 144 607u. F370CC. 20 129 1�1 ® 'V DDIF SNSSF. -30 ® r7 ARTLAB CLASSROOM 128 MD&F. =30000. 10 CLASSROOM 127 MISR x CLASSROOM 126 1UO3.F. =.00C. 21 124 6028..F. =31001 M 20 70(180) CLASSROOM FEC 123 60DSF. � I CLASSROOM SM&F. CLASSROOM 121 ) 6020 =31IX �{ P CLASSROOM 120 fi0l 19'F' =M� IJI � CLASSROOM 118 86020 F.F. =300M 33(1M)_ ( CLASSROOM 116 WOSF. MOC1 21 A CLASSR001 114 a B7 FIL BUSINESSMFA= U'=31IXC IDD CLASSROOM 112 20 110 SIS0 CLASSROOM ID II 21 CLASSROOM 106 _SF. =MOOD CORRIDOR 102 145 ' - 19DCC. / 119 603u. 20 SCIENCE LAB 141 7008F = 11000. 50 fC011U1ERu 142 705' = 15000. SCIENCE LAB 161 700SF. 50 CLASSROOM 720 CLASSROOM �g Ms.Fl 163 STOR MUSIC LAB CLASSROOM 165A 165 =.00C. MSSF164 R1rcr.W '19000. �I CLASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM TEACHER pLANNJ" 147 149 151 153 155 157 160 MOSF. _ 97 -.00G M13F. _ - 3100C. 301 SF ' =31001 20 M1 SF =31000. M1&F. = 31000. M1 SUF =31 OCC. F. =7001 a TOTALREOUIRED: a $ j W' 3a � j � s j ELEC. 1W It ,59FE 4 „/ 00 CLASSROOM M 148 9001F. =180M GDO . =MO' X43 so STORAGE > 143B LN / 143A i 01 CLASSROOM 117 20 IMP J CLASSROOM w l 115 I MOSF. 20 .(I8% 20 60 = 31000. A CLASSROOM 1 31(180) 113 J A 31(,.) CLASSROOM J MI BE � 91000. m 001 S.F. =)1001 20 CLASSROOM st(In 109 F0p J A l 31(18) CLASSROOM J BMSF. - 31000. 26 W' &' =31001 . CLASSROOM 3I(IM)105 J VA l 31(180) CLASSROOM J 104 F' =31001 cusal<u"M CLASSROOM CLASSROOM CLASSROOM ByF, �� 152 154 156 WDSF. _ BMSF. _ M2S.F. 727RAVIlDIST 20 - 33000. -Ma1 =31000. LIFE SAFETY PLAN CLASSROOM 158 NO ' = MITCC. SCALE: 1' =20' -V T PLUMBING FIXTURE CALCULATIONS (PER2010FBCPLUMBINQ USE E0UKATON(QSASSEMBLY(A4)& BUSINESS(B) BUSINESS OCCUPANCY 0 OCWPANCY:1,MS(E) 62BB K LTWURPDSERM.(42)687 FACULTY (B) PERTABLE103.1 U) WATERCLOSETS: MALE FEMALE DRINKING FOUNTAIN: WALL. REFER TO WALL TYPES FOR UL NUMBERS REQIIRED(Ek '".) 18(1130) REQUIRED (E} 18(11700) REQURED(h2k 2(1175) 20 5) REQUNEDIA2k 1(12.) TOTALREOUIRED: 18 18 TOTALREOUI= 1(79.1 TOTALPROVIOED: 19 IS TOTAL UIRED: 1S REQUIREO(Sk MALE FEMALE TOTALPIi0V10@ 1B TOTAL REQUIRED: 2(728:1150) 2(12&11W) 212076 TOTAL PROVIDED: 2 2 LAVATORIES: MALE FEMALE SERVILE SINK REWIREDn 16(11.) 18(1150) REQUIRED (4 1 REQU RED OA-2k 7(12.) 1(7200) REQUIRED (A-2): 1 TOTAL REQUIRED: 17 1T REOUIREDIBk 0 TOTAL PROVIDED: 17 17 2 REQUIRED(Sk MALE FEMALE TOTALPROVIDED: 2 TOTALREQUIRED: TOTALPROVIDED: 2(1140:10) 2 2(IMIA0) 2 PAO O 41 ® °r )RR 310 ® MULTI - PURPOSE ROOM �I ,69 1 40115 ,�OCC. 15 1*360) _P KITCIENAREA= 1418SF. =80, 2M 0 w h Fi U o � o °O am S-4 c. 3 0 BUSINESS OCCUPANCY 0 KITCHEN OCCUPANCY V 00 U) co CODE & LIFE SAFETY INFORMATION j o co U- N WALL. REFER TO WALL TYPES FOR UL NUMBERS - vi FBCMII- EDUCATION ow'u mPEWIRHw3Y15: IdFL00R = 61,317 SF 20 SF PERPEA90N UHO,UroRY: WBFPERPERBON GROSS e.I.(TOTAL)= 61,317 SF AccFSSOayUSE: N1NNE99: 1W 9FPERPERSON CNP.SDESIGN DATA N. MSFPERPEP�H TYPE B CONSTRUCTION ABRBRLT 15BPERPEA90N ((1 STORY d KITCHEN: 2.SFPERPERSON S�KIERED OCCUPANCY: AWENSLYW tA220CCwAMB ASSBE (B): 2WO,,CU ANI6 BU9INEB (B): BOCWPANTS IO1CHte1: BOCCIIPNOS rmw lyesaLCwAxrs 1. FRONfAGENCRFASEPEREWAMM& I-N IIMINGPERMEIERTHATFRONISMMUCWAYOROPENSPACE MAWNF£ETMNNM= 1BOFT.IW&PERUET MBUIL KING= 1B5Fr.MFAINCRFABEFACION= WIN 2 PERFBCWSSAUTWATCBPoNNFRSY3IEMINCRKSLl -3 X14,EWSF-14,5OOSF.LLitIWANEFROM TANEXO•U$OOSFTOTALALLOWED PFR FIA FORA 1WOSrog1'BIDG PER WOE FROMTABLESM. 3. PEREDW110N S1rOTALARFANL01t 'Ep PERSiIX1Y =B7.MBBF CHP.BCIXMSIRUCIGNREDUREMENIS dIP. 10 -MEANS OFEGRE59 REWIPFAEMS STRUCfUR11FM - OHRRMINGREWIRED 1M.1 .2NCN PEROCGIP. FNi EGPE93COMtlNENG b. SENRNG WAIL4 DHRRATNGREWIRED JINCHPEROCWP. PoAUAAAAYs FLONE OH.RATNORGXWED A CIXWDOR5;21NCHPER OCWPl0 __071!_ I ROOF: O HRMTNGREpUIRED rOMEMPROOPSPROYGW RILLYBFlONOERED B. 9fARWAYS:3 PKHPER0OMUP1S270CWP.= B- 292TRE/1 (29-210 VIDE STARY7AYS PR W NEO CHP.7- FlREABMdO:REWIRE2AENIS (tI1tlV WIDE9TORWAYPHWIDW CORROdi WA11S SMOIEPARI MTNGRC-0URED PEA iA8LE 1600.1 M,.1 IN FULYSPNNMERED LIFEBAfEfYSYSTEM: E -gency Ughling Wd EX Mgm MY. El NI EXIT REQUIREMENTS: FYa IN-end Smoke Defectlan Syeleou 0 Yee ❑ NO D end llmNanatlmum rondlSon 20 Feet Penk: Hard- MY. C3 No TreMdhft_be:Mmedn ..Mi8an200 Feat LIFE SAFETY SYMBOLS LEGEND NOIES: t. ALL PENETRATIONS OF RATED WALLS, WALLEXTENSIONS, FLOORAND ROOF SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A UL SYSTEM. ALTERNATE OR ADDITIONAL PENETRATION PROTECTION SYSTEMS MUST BE TEST CERTIFIED AND SUBMITTED AS ASHOP DRAWING FOR REVIEW. 2. PROVIDE STENCILING ON WALLS ABOVE CEILING FOR PROTECTED WALLS STATING1 HR OR 2 HRFIRE RATED WALL PROTECT ALL OPENINGS' (TYPICAL FOR ALL RATED WALLS). FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AND FIRE BLANKET PROVIDE FOR ROOMS SHOWN ON THE PLANS: 1. FLAMMABLE AREAS (SODIUM BICARBONATE 40 BC) SCIENCE LABS AIRHANDLINGUNIT ROOMS FLAMMABLE LIQUID STORAGE AREAS TEACHER LCUNGES KITCHENS INSTALL ALKALINE DRY CHEMICAL EXTINGUISHER(IYPE K) FOR SAPONIFICATION OF GREASES, WITHIN 15' OF COOKING EQUIPMENT 2, HAZARDOUS AREAS (4A60BC) WOODWORKING AND CONSTRUCTION SHOPS STORAGE ROOMS WHERE WOOD OR PAPER PRODUCTS ARE STORED ELECTRICAL ROOMS 3. LOW HAZARD AREAS (2A -10BC) CORRIDORS AND REMAUNING ROOMS CLASS A OR B FIRE AREAS 4. ELECTRONIC LAB AREAS (CARBON DIOXIDE, CLASS C, IOBC) 5. PROVIDE FIRE BLANKETS IN LABORATORIES BUSINESS OCCUPANCY KITCHEN OCCUPANCY SMOKE PARTITION CON81RMM WALL ALLOPENINGS AND E MECHANICAL PENETRATIONS SHALL BE PROTECTED TO MAPRAIN - - - - -- THE INTEGRIttOF THESMOKE PARTITION CONSTRUCTIONFORTHE N WALL. REFER TO WALL TYPES FOR UL NUMBERS P PRIMARY MEANS OF EGRESS ® EMERGENCY EMT LIGHT TWO SIDED WI DIRECTION ARROW C: EMERGENCY EXITUGHT(WALL MITT.) WI DIRECTION ARROW F_ OCCUPANTLOAD OPENING EGRESS CAPACITY n^ FIRE EXTINGUISHER BCABINET FEC �(' V) 0 WALL HUNG FIRE EXTINGUISHER O DOOR FIRE RATING IN MINUTES NOIES: t. ALL PENETRATIONS OF RATED WALLS, WALLEXTENSIONS, FLOORAND ROOF SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH A UL SYSTEM. ALTERNATE OR ADDITIONAL PENETRATION PROTECTION SYSTEMS MUST BE TEST CERTIFIED AND SUBMITTED AS ASHOP DRAWING FOR REVIEW. 2. PROVIDE STENCILING ON WALLS ABOVE CEILING FOR PROTECTED WALLS STATING1 HR OR 2 HRFIRE RATED WALL PROTECT ALL OPENINGS' (TYPICAL FOR ALL RATED WALLS). FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AND FIRE BLANKET PROVIDE FOR ROOMS SHOWN ON THE PLANS: 1. FLAMMABLE AREAS (SODIUM BICARBONATE 40 BC) SCIENCE LABS AIRHANDLINGUNIT ROOMS FLAMMABLE LIQUID STORAGE AREAS TEACHER LCUNGES KITCHENS INSTALL ALKALINE DRY CHEMICAL EXTINGUISHER(IYPE K) FOR SAPONIFICATION OF GREASES, WITHIN 15' OF COOKING EQUIPMENT 2, HAZARDOUS AREAS (4A60BC) WOODWORKING AND CONSTRUCTION SHOPS STORAGE ROOMS WHERE WOOD OR PAPER PRODUCTS ARE STORED ELECTRICAL ROOMS 3. LOW HAZARD AREAS (2A -10BC) CORRIDORS AND REMAUNING ROOMS CLASS A OR B FIRE AREAS 4. ELECTRONIC LAB AREAS (CARBON DIOXIDE, CLASS C, IOBC) 5. PROVIDE FIRE BLANKETS IN LABORATORIES no. 0 1 -29 -13 drawing LSl.l copyright 2012 couTDrts oPTnrsf oocuueNTS, wslvf osmf oeslGN ARe coP+RlonTm ANTI PROPmfTARY.'RIE APLnnTo SHALL V5E 5A lEGP1 AVENUE• NY U5E NOTO PROTECT oC1 -151 T. ANY USE NOT AUMOWZro IN N'miING BT THE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. C E U O N E C: CO a) ICU n^ m �(' V) E C ryryM LL NCD Of commission 212076 no. 0 1 -29 -13 drawing LSl.l copyright 2012 couTDrts oPTnrsf oocuueNTS, wslvf osmf oeslGN ARe coP+RlonTm ANTI PROPmfTARY.'RIE APLnnTo SHALL V5E 5A lEGP1 AVENUE• NY U5E NOTO PROTECT oC1 -151 T. ANY USE NOT AUMOWZro IN N'miING BT THE ARCHITECT IS PROHIBITED. rf'ais ,s- a*ce Charter Scho I r f 1 / 3 C i c� � ourte111a1�c 1 archilerls CSC k o -vt- . .y L_-Renaissance Charter School ti'Lfl ='� o_ o � V j courtelnxid]e 7 arrhilcrts Renaissance Charter School -r-- -- te c i h courteMan, & architects K. - oe o enaissa-n-6e Charter school tercilla courtemanche architects enaissance Charte CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: May 14, 2013 Petition: PCDA- 12 -12- 000013 Subject/Agenda Item: PGA Office Center PCD Amendment Recommendation to City Council: A request by Florida Power & Light and Spearfisher Partners, LLLP. for an amendment to the PGA Office Center Planned Community Development (PCD) (f.k.a. 5A / PGA Corporate Center) to approve 993,000 square feet of office space and accessory uses. The 86.34 -acre site is located east of Military Trail, west of Alternate A1A, and is bisected by Kyoto Gardens Drive. [X] Recommendation to APPROVE [ ] Recommendation to DENY Revie ed by: Originating Dept.: Finance: PZAB Action: Di n r of Planning & Zo Planning & Zoning: Project Hager Accountant [ ] Rec. Approval [ ] Rec. Approval w/ Conditions. at Vie M. Crowley, AICP City Attorney Sarah Varga Fees Paid: Yes [ ] Rec. Denial [ ] Continued to: Nat lie rowley, AICP Dir for of Planning & Zoning Funding Source: [X] Quasi — Judicial R. Max Lohman, Esq. [ ] Legislative [ ] Operating Development Compliance [X] Public Hearing [X] Other N/A Advertised: [X] Required [ ]Not Required Attachments: . Development Application Budget Acct. #: N/A Bahareh Wolfs, AICP Date: 05/03/2013 Paper: Palm Beach Post Effective Date: N/A • Project Narrative • Location Map • Development Plans Approved By: City Manager Expiration Date: N/A Affected parties: [X] Notified [ ] Not Required Ronald M. Ferris Meeting Date: May 14, 2013 PCDA- 12 -12- 000013 Page 2 of 9 A request by Florida Power & Light and Spearfisher Partners, LLLP. for an amendment to the PGA Office Center Planned Community Development (PCD) (f.k.a. 5A / PGA Corporate Center) to approve 993,000 square feet of office space and accessory uses on the 86.34 -acre site. Staff is recommending approval of the petition. In 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance 34, 2005 and Resolution 166, 2005. Ordinance 34, 2005 rezoned the subject parcel from Research and Light Industrial Park (M1) and Planned Development Area (PDA) to a Planned Community District (PCD) Overlay with an underlying zoning designation of Research and Light Industrial Park (M1). Resolution 166, 2005 approved PGA Office Center site plan, which included 240,000 square feet of office use, 600,000 square feet of light industrial use, and 42,000 square feet of ancillary commercial use on 17 individual lots. In 2008, the subject site was platted through the adoption of Resolution 80, 2008. In 2011, the City Council adopted of approval related to the timing acre preserve. LAND USE & ZONING Resolution 31, 2011, which modified one (1) condition of the installation of supplemental plantings in the 10- The PGA Office Center PCD has an Industrial (1) future land -use designation and a zoning designation PCD Overlay with and underlying zoning designation of M1. Site Details The PGA Office Center PCD Plan is comprised of four (4) Parcel C (preserve and open acres. Meeting Date: May 14, 2013 PCDA- 12 -12- 000013 Page 3 of 9 is 86.34 acres in size and is largely vacant. The Master parcels; Parcel A is 50.78 acres, Parcel B is 4.25 acres, space) is 11.01 acres, and Parcel D (lake area) is 12.30 No vertical buildings have been constructed on site. Kyoto Gardens drive and RCA Center Drive have been constructed which provide access to and around the site. An existing 10 -acre preserve area that is part of the PUD located north of Kyoto Gardens drive remains today along with the existing lakes. No changes are proposed to the existing lakes or preserve area. Subject Request The applicant proposes to modify the approved master PCD plan to provide for 993,000 square feet of office space and accessory uses. The main campus within the PCD will contain 913,000 square feet on the 50.78 -acre parcel (Parcel A). The 4.25 acre parcel (Parcel B) is proposed to have up to 80,000 square feet of office space. The proposed PCD amendment will approve the base Master Plan for the project. The applicant will be required to go through the site plan approval process and will need to go through the re- platting process prior to the commencement of any construction on- site. Traffic The site was granted a conditional concurrency certification on December 11 2000 for the development of 240,000 square feet of general office use and 600,000 square feet of industrial use. In 2005, the traffic approval was amended to reflect 240,000 square feet of general office use and 600,000 square feet of industrial use. On November 7, 2008, the site received concurrency approval (petition CONC- 08 -08- 000011) from Palm Beach County for a 200 -room hotel, a 60 -room hotel, 450,000 square feet of general office and 450,000 square feet of research and development with a build out date of 2014. On March 8, 2012, the City approved an amendment to the traffic approval through an equivalency for 993,000 square feet of general office. The Build -Out date is December 31, 2014. Meeting Date: May 14, 2013 PCDA- 12 -12- 000013 Page 4 of 9 Design Guidelines Design Guidelines will be adopted as part of the development order, which will set forth the regulations and development standards for the PCD. The Design Guidelines address setbacks, height, landscaping, signage, lighting, uses, architecture, and screening. Many of the proposed standards exceed the City's code requirements for the M1 zoning district. Please see attached "Design Guidelines" dated April 2013. Building Height The Applicant is proposing a maximum building height of 90 feet for Parcel B and 165 feet (12 -15 stories) for the main campus (Parcel A). The proposed plan takes into consideration the existing residential uses north of the site and has proposed a tiering plan so that the buildings with the most height are oriented toward Interstate -95 and PGA Boulevard. The proposed height is consistent with the Height Visioning Workshops held by the City in 2006. Additional setback requirements are also proposed for each parcel and buildings taller than 50 feet. A waiver is being requested as part of PCD amendment. Parking The proposed parking ratio for the PCD is proposed to be one (1) parking space per 300 square feet of gross building area. All parking spaces will be provided in accordance with City Code. Landscaping The previously approved PCD landscape buffers and preserve area are proposed to remain in place. The Applicant has committed to providing 90 percent native trees and shrubs on the site. Each individual site plan is required to provide a landscape plan, which will be reviewed against the City's landscape regulations at that time. Since The signage throughout the PCD shall be consistent. The applicant will be submitting a master signage program at a later time. Architecture Section B of the Design Guidelines addresses the architecture style of the project. The guidelines are applicable to all commercial and office uses within the PCD, including any future outparcels. The guidelines promote buildings that solicit visual interest, are scaled to the surrounding area, contain public spaces and amenities, provide a variety of entrances, windows, and balconies, and provide pedestrian shelter elements such as awnings, arcades, roof overhangs, and porticos. Uses The proposed permitted uses within the PCD are attached as Exhibit 'A' to the proposed PCD amendment. Meeting Date: May 14, 2013 PCDA- 12 -12- 000013 Page 5 of 9 Helistop The Applicant is proposing a helistop as a permitted use within the PCD. The proposed helistop is a transportation facility necessary to FPL's operations, specifically during times of inclement weather. The helistop will not be used for overnight parking, refueling, or maintenance purposes. The proposed helistop will not be accessible to the general public and no public vehicle access is proposed. It is solely for the use of the owner of Parcel A. The helistop will exceed all applicable setback requirements from residential uses. Additionally, the Applicant is proposing several measures to mitigate any potential noise created by the helistop. The Applicant is proposing an 800 -foot setback from any residential neighborhoods. FPL has successfully operated a helistop at its Juno Beach campus, which is located between 560 and 600 feet from the adjacent residents. Flight routes and heights have been adjusted to minimize any noise experienced from the helistop. As a result, FPL maintains a good relationship with the surrounding communities. Additionally, FPL applies the "Fly Neighborly" program, which calls for helicopter to fly as high as practical and to avoid residential areas. Typically, helicopters use by FPL fly at approximately 1,500 feet. At this height, there would be far less impact than that produced other operators, such as law enforcement, hospital, or news helicopters, which fly at about 500 feet. FPL has successfully implemented the "Fly Neighborly" program at its headquarters in Juno Beach, which is also adjacent residential neighborhoods. The program is established by the Helicopter Association International, which is a voluntary noise reduction plan for helicopter operators. In accordance with the "Fly Neighborly" program, FPL is committed to avoiding late night and early morning flights. Aviation lighting for the helistop will be provided pursuant to federal safety regulations. No other lighting is proposed. The helistop will need to comply with all federal and state regulations, including F.S. Chapter 330. Staff is supportive of including the helipad as a permitted use. Waiver Request Meeting Date: May 14, 2013 PCDA- 12 -12- 000013 Page 6 of 9 consideration the existing residential uses north of the site and has proposed a tiering plan so that the buildings with the most height are oriented toward Interstate -95 and PGA Boulevard. Additional setback requirements are also proposed for each parcel and buildings taller than 50 feet. The proposed height is consistent with the Height Visioning Workshops held by the City in 2006. The proposed height is also consistent with existing buildings along the PGA Corridor. Staff recommends approval of the subject waiver. • - • I E 1 • • • •� The subject petition has been reviewed by the DRC. At this time, all certification issues have been satisfied. • • N N a • • Staff recommends APPROVAL of petition PCDA- 12 -12- 000013 with the following conditions: Planninq & Zoning 1. Prior to the scheduling of City Council, all outstanding issues from the DRC memo dated 4/23/13 must be addressed. 2. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for vertical construction on Parcel "A ", Buffer `C' shall be completed and accepted by the City. 3. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for vertical construction on Parcel "A ", the fountain within the 1.48 acre lake section of Parcel D shall be installed and operating and the existing two fountains in the 10.82 acre lake shall be in complete operation and functioning. 4. The Applicant, its successors, or assigns shall be responsible for the landscape and irrigation maintenance of the medians and road shoulders within RCA Center Boulevard from Kyoto Gardens Drive to PGA Boulevard. 5. The Applicant, its successors, or assigns shall be responsible for the maintenance of the shorelines under the Kyoto Gardens Drive bridge from the water's edge to the bridge structure, and along the 1 -95 waterway associated with Parcels "A" and "D ", including removal of non - native plants (aquatic and terrestrial), debris, and trash. 6. Prior to the issuance of the each vertical building permit, the Applicant shall comply with Section 78 -262 of the City Code relative to Art in Public Places. If the Applicant is providing public art on site, the art shall be installed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, or as determined by the application for approval of the art and shall be done as part each individual site plan approval process. Meeting Date: May 14, 2013 PCDA- 12 -12- 000013 Page 7 of 9 7. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy on site, the Applicant shall obtain approval of a Master Signage Program for the Property. 8. The development on site shall be limited to a maximum of 993,000 square -feet of general office use, or equivalent thereof. 9. Uses in the PCD shall be limited to the list of permitted uses contained as Exhibit `A' in the Development Order. 10. During the period of effectiveness of this development order, the Applicant shall annually provide the City with a status report on all the approved elements of the PCD, including a summary of completed construction, a schedule of proposed construction over the remaining life of the development order, and verification of compliance with all conditions of approval. The annual report should be provided each year prior to the anniversary date of the approval of this Resolution. 11. The Public Access - Easements that provide access to certain parcels from Kyoto Gardens Drive shall have sidewalks on both sides, with a minimum width of five (5) feet. 12.After removal of the exotics from the ten (10) acre preserve, installation of the supplemental landscaping within the ten (10) acre preserve shall be required prior to the issuance of the first building permit for vertical construction on Parcel 5A. 13. Prior to land clearing, the Applicant shall obtain a tree removal permit from the Planning and Zoning Department. 14. The Applicant, its successors, or assigns shall be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaping within (1) the portion of Kyoto Gardens Drive from Military Trail to Alternate A1A; (2) the western road shoulder and one -half (1/2) of the median of Alternate A1A from PGA Boulevard to the northern boundary of the Property; and (3) the northern road shoulder and one -half (112) of the median of PGA Boulevard from Alternate A1A to Interstate 95. 15. If permitted by FDOT, the landscaping within the western road shoulder of Alternate A1A from PGA Boulevard to the northern boundary of the Property and the Alternate A1A median from PGA Boulevard to Kyoto Gardens Drive shall be installed within six (6) months of the issuance of the first alteration permit for an individual parcel within the PCD. A one -time extension may be granted by the Director of Planning and Zoning. Meeting Date: May 14, 2013 PCDA- 12 -12- 000013 Page 8 of 9 shelf with a slope no steeper than one (1) foot vertical to ten (10) feet horizontal (1:10) to a distance no deeper than two (2) feet below the control elevation. 17.All trees planted within the littoral zone areas shall be restricted to the 10:1 littoral shelves and must be approved by the City Forester. Trees shall be planted in clusters no greater than 30 feet wide; and cluster trees cannot be closer than 40 feet to another cluster; and single or cluster trees shall not be planted closer than 75 feet to a drainage structure. 18. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, digital copies of the approved plans for record shall be submitted to the GIS Manager. Engineerinq 19.At the time of replatting, the City and Applicant shall revisit the location of the current dedicated 10' x 30' easement along Kyoto Gardens Drive for a bus /trolley shelter. If the applicant or City deems that a more suitable location for this easement is necessary based on site plan conditions, then the applicant shall relocate the easement on the replat. Within sixty (60) days of a written determination from Palm Tran or the City Council that a bus /trolley shelter will be utilized on the subject site, the Applicant, its successors, or assigns shall submit an application for an administrative approval to allow for review and approval of the site plan, landscape plan, and building elevations for the bus shelter. The bus shelter design shall be consistent with the City Council's previous approval of such shelters. The Applicant, its successors, or assigns shall be responsible for the construction of a bus shelter in a timely manner to accommodate Palm Tran's or the City's needs for the bus shelter. The bus shelter shall be constructed within six (6) months of the approval of the administrative amendment, unless another time frame is established in the administrative approval. 20. The build out date for this project is December 31, 2014, or as otherwise extended in accordance with the City's Land Development Regulations. 21. Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the Applicant shall provide written authorization from all appropriate utility agencies for the construction /landscaping /lighting within the respective utility easements. 22. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, reflectors per FDOT Index 17349 shall be constructed at the temporary dead end of the north -south roadway within the PGA Office Center PCD (if the roadway construction is not fully completed to the south). elements for the onsite and infrastructure, landscaping and dated, signed and sealed by a registered in the State of Flori combined City approved cost (Engineering) Meeting Date: May 14, 2013 PCDA- 12 -12- 000013 Page 9of9 offsite improvements for the project for the irrigation costs. The cost estimates shall be professional engineer and landscape architect da. Surety will be based on 110% of the total estimates and shall be posted with the City. 24.At all times during construction activities, the Applicant shall provide all necessary construction zone signage, fencing and screening in order to keep the site safe and prevent vandalism as required by the City Engineer. 25. The Applicant shall comply with all Federal EPA and State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection NPDES permit requirements, including, but not limited to, preparation of a stormwater pollution prevention plan and identification of appropriate Best Management Practices, as generally accepted by the Environmental Planning Agency (EPA) and /or local regulatory agencies, for construction activities, submission of a Notice of Intent to EPA or its designee, implementation of the approved plans, inspection and maintenance of controls during construction, and submission of a Notice of Termination. 26. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit for each site plan, the Applicant shall provide a paving, grading, and drainage plan along with surface water management calculations and hydraulic pipe calculations for City review and approval. The paving, grading, and drainage plan and calculations shall be signed and sealed by a professional engineer licensed in the State of Florida. 27. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant shall schedule a pre - permit meeting with City staff. 10500 North Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 (561) 799 -4243 Fax (561) 799 -4281 F,Planned Unit Development (PUD) [X'AAmendment to PCD, PUD or Site Plan !Conditional Use F'Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan F' Administrative Approval Administrative Appeal ,Annexation ['Rezoning ;,,Site Plan Review F'jConcurrency Certificate ( —,Time Extension F' Miscellaneous Other Date Submitted: February 29, 2012 Project Name: NEXTera (f.k.a. Parcel 5a /PGA Corporate Center) PCD Amendment Owner: Florida Power & Light Company and Spearfisher Partners LLLP Applicant (if notOwner): Applicant's Address: 700 Universe Blvd, Juno Beach, FLdTelephoneNo.561- 697 -8000 Agent: Ken Tuma and Urban Design Kilday Studios and Brian Seymour of Gunster Law Firm Contact Person: Ken Tuma or Marty R.A. Minor E -Mail: ktumapudkstudios.com and mV Agent's Mailing Address: 477 S. Rosemary Avenue, #225, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Agent's TelephoneNumber: 561- 366 -1100 Application $ Receipt Number: •. • •► Date & Time Received: Engineering$ Architect: Glidden, Spina & Partners Engineer: Kimley Horn and Associates Planner: Urban Design Kilday Studios La ndsca pe Architect: General Location: Address: Section: 1 /6 Urban Design Kilday Studios East of Military Trail, West of Alternate A1A, north and south of Kyoto Gardens Drivi Township: 42S Range: 42E/43E PropertyControl Number(s): 52424201240230000/52424201240150000/52424201240160000 52424201240000010 /20/30/40/50/60 /80/90/100/110/ 120/130/140/150 /160/170 86.34 acres PCD (M -1) Acreage: Current Zoning: Flood Zone B RequestedZoning: No Change Base Flood Elevation (BFE) -to be indicated on site pla Current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: Industrial /ROS Existing Land Use: vacant Requested Land Use: Corporate Office Campus Proposed Use(s) i.e. hotel, single family residence,etc.: N/A Proposed Square Footageby Use: 993,000 square feet of office space Proposed NumberandType of Dwelling Unit(s) i.e. singlefamily, multifamily, etc. (if applicable): N/A K Information concerning all requests (attach additional sheets if needed.) {Section 78 -46, Application Procedures, Land Development Regulations.{ 1. Explain the nature of the request: This is a request to amend the approved Planned Community Development for the 86.34 acre site f.k.a. PGA Corporate Center (Parcel 5a) for a new development program proposed by NEXTera. The applicant proposes to modify the concurrency certification and Master Plan to provide a 993,000 square foot corporate office campus with ancillary uses. It is the desire of the applicant to create an attractive campus environment, encouraging pedestrian use, open space, enhanced setbacks, and proposes to direct building heights away from neighboring residential uses. 2. What will be the impact of the proposed change on the surrounding area? The applicant is proposing design guidelines for the campus that provide enhanced building setbacks and open space, and proposes to direct building heights away from neighboring uses, thus minimizing impacts to the surrounding area and neighboring residents. This request is consistent with the site's Future Land Use designatii 3. Describe how the rezoning request complies with the City's Vision Plan and the following elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Infrastructure, Coastal Management, Conservations, Recreation and Open space, Intergovernmental Coordination and Capital Improvement. . The proposed amendment to the Planned Community Development development program is consistent with the City's Vision Plan and Comprehensive Plan and the proposed office use is consistent with the site's Future Land Use designation. Please refer to the Project Narrative, submitted as part of this request, for additional information. (c 4. How does the proposed project comply with City requirements for preservation of natural resources and native vegetation (Section 78 -301, Land Development Regulations)? As conditioned by Resolution 1, 2001, a ten (10) acre are of preservation (Parcel C) has been provided for on the site. Parcel C is located in the northeast section of the Planned Community District. 5. How will the proposed project comply with City requirements for Art in Public Places (Chapter 78 -261, Land Development Regulations)? The applicant proposes to comply with all Art in Public Places on the site. Art in Public Places will be more specifically addressed during the site plan review portion of the development approval process. 6. Has project received concurrency certification? Yes, however a request to concurrently modify the approved Concurrency Certification is included. Date Received: 2008 -2009 I • • • 011"MIT ME (Attach additional sheets if needed) Or see attached deed for legal description. The subject property is located approximately 0 mile(s) from the intersectionof PGA Blvd. and Alternate A1A , on theF] north zeast, southIlwest side of PGA Boulevard and the 1 -95 Entrance Ramps. (street /road). M 2. t w r `,� • • °r &IMPer g M �R Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared who, being by me first duly sworn, on oath deposed and says: That he /she is the fee simple title owner of the property described in the attached Legal Description. That he /she is requesting City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. That he /she has appointed as authorized agent on his /her behalf to accomplish the above project. Name of Owner: Signatureof Owner StreetAddress P. O. Box TelephoneNumber E -mail Address Sworn and subscribed before me this My Commission expires: By: Name/Title City, State, Zip Code City, State,Zip Code Fax Number day of 5 Notary Public in the to act I /We affirm and certify that I /we understand and will comply with the land development regulations of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. I We further certify that the statements or diagrams made on any paper or plans submitted here with are true to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Further, I /we understand that this application, attachments, and application filing fees become a part of the official records of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and are not returnable. Applicant is: Signatureof Applicant F'', Owner Ken Tuma Print Name of Applicant I' Optionee 477 S. Rosemary Avenue [' Lessee F7 Agent F' Contract Purchaser Street Address West Palm Beach, FL 33401 City, State, Zip Code 561 - 366 -1100 TelephoneNumber 561 - 366 -1111 Fax Number ktuma @udkstudios.com E -Mail Address k '! Permit # Palm Beach Gardens Planning and Zoning Department 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 561- 799 -4230 Financial Responsibility Form The owner understands that all City- incurred professional fees and expenses associated with the processing of this application request are ultimately the responsibility of the owner. A security deposit shall be deposited in an interest - bearing account with any accrued interest to be retained by the City of Palm Beach Gardens. The owner and /or designee shall be invoiced on a monthly basis for professional fees such as, but not limited to, consultant engineering services, legal services, advertising costs, and /or any other costs attributable to the processing of the permit for which the City incurred during the previous month. The owner and /or designee shall reimburse the City within thirty (30) days from date of invoice. If payment is not received, the City may utilize the security deposit for re- imbursement purposes. All activities related to the pending permit(s) will cease until any outstanding invoices are paid. The owner /designee further understands that transfer of this responsibility shall require a completed form, signed and notarized by the responsible party, and delivered to the City Planning and Zoning Department if the name and /or address of the responsible party changes at anytime during the application review process. Owner signature Owner printed name DESIGNEE /BILL TO: �0111r-AllI0•]9 COUNTY OF Date Property Control Number Designee Acceptance Signature NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT hereby certify that the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 20_, by . He or she is personally known to me or has produced as identification. Notary public signature Printed name State of at -large My Commission expires: PROJECT NARRATIVE PGA Office Center Planned Community Development Amendment April 1, 2013 Request /Location urban kilday Urban Planning and Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics Please accept this request, on behalf of Florida Power and Light Company and Spearfisher Partners, LLLP, for an amendment to, and new development program for, the PGA Office Center Planned Community Development (PCD). The project is generally located east of Military Trail, west of Alternate A1A and north and south of Kyoto Gardens Drive. The subject site is largely vacant and consists of approximately 86.34 acres. The property has Industrial (1) and Recreation Open Space Future Land Use designations and a PCD (M -1) zoning designation. It is located within the City's Bioscience Research Protection Overlay. In 2005, the subject site received PCD approval for 17 developable lots and 240,000 square feet of office use and 600,000 square feet of industrial use, including 42,000 square feet of ancillary commercial use. The development plan has not been constructed. However, the roadway network, consisting of extensions of Kyoto Gardens Drive, connecting Military Trail to Alternate A1A, and RCA Center Drive through the site, has been constructed and is in use. The applicants propose to modify the project's concurrency certification and master plan to provide for a total of 993,000 square feet of office space and accessory uses. The main campus within the PCD will consist of 913,000 square feet of offices on the 50.78 -acre Parcel A. Parcel B, which is 4.25 acres in size, is requested to have up to 80,000 square feet of professional office space. Parcel C of the PCD is the 10 -acre upland preserve site and Parcel D is an 11.83 acre lake and open space site. As part of its request, the applicant is seeking to have a helistop approved as a permitted use within the PCD. The applicant is aware that a helistop is typically a Major Conditional Use. Because it would be a permitted use within the PCD, the applicant is providing enhanced setbacks from residential areas. Further, as support for the approval of the helistop, with the enhanced setbacks, as a permitted use within the PCD, the applicant will demonstrate compliance with the Major Conditional use requirements (discussed below). It is the applicant's desire to create an attractive campus environment that encourages pedestrian use, employs enhanced setbacks and open space, and directs building height away from nearby residential neighborhoods. Targeted Expedited Permitting Program Section 78 -57 of the City's Land Development Regulations establishes a Targeted Expedited Permitting Program (TEPP) for qualifying businesses that bring economic deyelopmewt.a.nd value - added jobs to the City. One of the criteria for qualifying for the TEPP `is :t6,,be,sanctioned by an economic development organization. The Business Development 1309rd of PP rb ,4exh, County (BDB), which is the local economic development organization, has sanctioned this proposal and has recommended it for expedited review within the City. We request the City review this application through the TEPP process. The subject property was granted a conditional for the development of 240,000 square feet of use or their traffic equivalents. In 2005, the PCD 240,000 square feet of office use and 600,000 2008, Palm Beach County approved conditional 60 -room hotel, 450,000 square feet of general development with a build out date of December concurrency certification on December 11, 2000 office use and 600,000 square feet of industrial was approved with the development program of square feet of industrial use. On November 7, concurrency for the site for a 200 -room hotel, a office and 450,000 square feet of research and 2014, The applicant is seeking to amend the concurrency certification, in addition with this PCD amendment request, to allow for 993,000 square feet of office use. On March 8, 2012, the City issued its traffic concurrency approval for the proposed 993,000 square feet of office space. History The property's 86.34 acres was originally owned by The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and was identified as Parcel 5A. The property was part of the 1999 Forbearance Agreement and was designated for Industrial Uses. The City Council had also designated approximately 11,83 acres of the northern portion of the site as having a Recreation and Open Space (ROS) Future Land Use designation as a means of providing a buffer between the future development and the Garden Woods and Winchester Courts residential neighborhoods. As described above, the property received concurrency certification in 2000. On February 1, 2001, the City Council adopted Resolution 1, 2001 providing for the approval of a 10 -acre upland preserve on the subject site. As approved in Resolution 1, 2001, the 10 -acre preserve meets the upland habitat preservation requirement for this property (Parcel 5A), and also Parcel 5B and Parcel 28.01 (Legacy Place). In 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance 34, 2005 and Resolution 166, 2005 which created the PGA Office Center PCD, The PCD consisted of 17 developable lots and approval of 240,000 square feet of office uses and 600,000 square feet of light industrial uses, including 42,000 square feet of ancillary commercial use. In 2008, the MacArthur Parcel 5A plat was approved for the site and recorded. In 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution 31, 2011, which amended condition of approval #13 of Resolution 166, 2005 to modify the timeframe for the installation at the supplemental plantings for the 10 -acre preserve. No vertical building construction has occurred on site. However, the public roadways, Kyoto Gardens Drive and RCA Center Drive, were extended through the site to provide an internal roadway network for the site. Access Direct access to the site will be provided from Kyoto Gardens Drive and RCA Center Drive. Additional access to Parcels A and B within the attached PCD Master Plan will be provided through a 30 -foot wide access easement from Kyoto Gardens Drive. � EXISTING USE ZONING FUTURE LAND USE SUBJECT PROPERTY: Planned Community Development Industrial (1) and Recreation Open Existing - Vacant (PCD) with underlying zoning of Space (ROS) Requested — Office Campus Research and Light Industrial (M -1) TO THE NORTH: Gardens Woods Residential Residential Low Density -3 (RL -3) Residential Low (RL) Development Winchester Courts Residential Residential Medium RM with a Development Planned Unit Development overlay TO THE SOUTH: Interstate 95 On -Ramp, PGA Research and Light Industrial Park Mixed Use (MXD) Boulevard and PGA Professional & (M -1) with Planned Unit Design Center (Parcel 5B) Development overlay TO THE WEST: Residential Medium (RM) with PUD Residential Medium (RM) & Interstate 95 /Military Trail overlay & General Commercial Commercial (C) Gardens Lakes Residential (CG -1) with PUD overlay Develoment & Doubletree North TO THE EAST: Alternate A1A Planned Community Development Professional Office (PO) Regional Center Development of (PCD) /Commercial (C) /Residential High Regional Impact (RH) Development Regulations and Site Analysis With this application, the applicant is submitting a master plan, landscape buffer plans, PCD Use List, and Design Guidelines as the proposed governing documents for the PCD. Section 78- 155(c) of the City Code permits the provision of design guidelines as the regulations for the development of specific PCDs. The goal of the proposed Design Guidelines is to create a framework for an attractive and sustainable campus setting for the variety of uses that comprise an office setting for the Primary Campus (Parcel A). The PCD will be designed to facilitate economic activities while limiting impacts to adjacent properties and the City. The development regulations proposed in the Design Guidelines exceed code requirements with regards to the provision of open space, setbacks and landscaping buffers. The proposed building height is consistent with the six (6) to 12 stories envisioned at the City's 2006 Height Visioning Workshops. This project will also comply with the Workshop recommendations to taper or step down the building heights in the areas of the site closest to residential. PGA Office Center PCD Amendment April 1, 2013 Project Narrative Page 3 of 15 As indicated in the table below, the ability to achieve the proposed building height is dependent upon specific criteria regarding lot size, additional setbacks and separation from residential districts. For example, all buildings in the PCD shall be separated from any residential zoning district by 400 linear feet which is more than five (5) times the City - required separation of 75 feet between industrial buildings and residential zoning districts. Additional building height is also mitigated through increased setbacks from adjacent rights -of -way. The proposed development program is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations with regards to the proposed use and development parameters. Below is an analysis of how the proposed Master Plan and Design Guidelines relate to City standards: City's M -1 Property (Research and PGA Office Center PCD Development Light Industrial) 2005 PCD Approval Master Plan & Consistent with Regulation District Design Guidelines City Code? Regulations Min. Building Site 10000 10,000 for Office Exceeds Code Area Sq. Ft. 15,000 for Industrial 1 Ac. Minimum Minimum Lot Width 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet Yes Exceeds Code Minimum Lot Depth N/A N/A 200 feet Minimum 40% for Office Max. Lot Coverage 40% 40/ o for PCD Yes 60% for Industrial 1 40% for PCD Exceeds Code Min. Open Space p p 36% Minimum 20% with PCD 15% per parcel 90 feet for building on parcels less No. Height and than 5 acres in size. mitigation Max. Building Height 50 Ft. 50 ft. measures are (Ft) 165 feet for buildings on parcels 5 addressed in acres and larger and meeting the the Design required enhanced setbacks. Guidelines. Min. Building Setback from Residential 75 feet 400 feet Exceeds Code District N/A Minimum Setbacks* for Parcels less than 5 acres in size Front Side Side (Street Facing) 25 feet 25 feet 30 feet Rear 15 feet 15 feet 30 feet Exceeds Code *Setbacks to be measured 15 feet 15 feet 30 feet Minimum from right -of -way lines, lot 20 feet 20 feet 30 feet lines, property lines and access easement lines. City's M -1 Property (Research and Development Light Industrial) 2005 PCD Approval FGA Office Center Consistent with ` Regulation District City Code? Regulations Setbacks* for Parcels greater than 5 acres in size Front Side Side (Street Facing) 25 feet 25 feet 50 feet - from Kyoto Gardens Drive 15 feet 15 feet 30 feet 15 feet 15 feet 30 feet - from PGA Boulevard, Interstate 95, RCA Center Drive, Exceeds Code Rear Alternate A1A, and access Minimum *Setbacks to be measured easement lines. from right -of -way lines, lot 20 feet 20 feet 30 feet lines, property lines and access easement lines. South from the Kyoto Gardens Additional setbacks* Drive right -of -way: for building heights taller than 50 feet. A maximum 50 -foot high building at 50 -foot setback. For each additional foot of building height, the setback from Kyoto Gardens Drive shall increase 1.5 feet. As an example, an 80 -foot high building N/A N/A shall be located a minimum of 95 N/A feet from the Kyoto Gardens Drive. A maximum 165 -foot tall building shall be setback from Kyoto Gardens Drive a minimum of 222 * Setbacks to be measured feet• from right -of -way lines, lot lines, property lines and From Interstate 95, PGA access easement lines. Boulevard, and RCA Center Drive right -of -ways: A maximum 50 -foot high building Uses Allowable uses are listed within the attached List of Permitted Use. Building Height Decisions regarding building height within the City have been established to balance between economic growth in the community and the mitigation of possible impacts of the height. In the fall of 2006, the City hosted two community planning sessions /charrettes on building height, which are known as the Height Visioning Workshops. As outlined in the report on the charrettes, additional building height was directed to the Interstate 95 corridor and PGA Boulevard. Within the Final Height Contours Map created during the Visioning Workshops, the subject site was identified as having the capacity of hosting building heights from six (6) to 12 stories along PGA Boulevard, 3 to 5 stories in the `middle' of the site, and one (1) to two (2) stories along the site's northern boundary, adjacent to existing residential neighborhoods. The PCD's underlying zoning designation of M -1, Research and Light Industrial Park, has a height standard of 50 feet. Within the proposed PCD Design Guidelines, all buildings will be separated from any residential neighborhood by a minimum of 400 linear feet. No buildings will be located north of Kyoto Gardens Drive. The Master Plan and Design Guidelines have been designed to place taller buildings on larger parcels that are able to provide the additional setbacks, building tiering and open space needed to facilitate the proposed building heights. For parcels less than 5 acres in at the 30 -foot setback A maximum 165 foot high at 75- footsetback From 30 -foot wide access easement and internal lot lines: 50 -feet high at 30 -foot setback For each additional 1.5 feet of building height, the setback shall increase by one foot. For example, a 165 -foot high building shall be set back a minimum of 106 feet from the access easement. City's M -1 Property (Research and Development Light Industrial) 2005 PCD Approval PGA Office Center Consistent with Regulation ` District City Code? Regulations Maximum Lot Coverage for N/A N/A Building in excess 50 feet in height N/A Additional Height shall not exceed 15% of the parcel. Uses Allowable uses are listed within the attached List of Permitted Use. Building Height Decisions regarding building height within the City have been established to balance between economic growth in the community and the mitigation of possible impacts of the height. In the fall of 2006, the City hosted two community planning sessions /charrettes on building height, which are known as the Height Visioning Workshops. As outlined in the report on the charrettes, additional building height was directed to the Interstate 95 corridor and PGA Boulevard. Within the Final Height Contours Map created during the Visioning Workshops, the subject site was identified as having the capacity of hosting building heights from six (6) to 12 stories along PGA Boulevard, 3 to 5 stories in the `middle' of the site, and one (1) to two (2) stories along the site's northern boundary, adjacent to existing residential neighborhoods. The PCD's underlying zoning designation of M -1, Research and Light Industrial Park, has a height standard of 50 feet. Within the proposed PCD Design Guidelines, all buildings will be separated from any residential neighborhood by a minimum of 400 linear feet. No buildings will be located north of Kyoto Gardens Drive. The Master Plan and Design Guidelines have been designed to place taller buildings on larger parcels that are able to provide the additional setbacks, building tiering and open space needed to facilitate the proposed building heights. For parcels less than 5 acres in size, building heights will be limited to 90 feet or less in height. Within these parcels, additional setbacks and building tiering are required. The Interstate 95, PGA Boulevard, Alternate A1A and associated flyovers and ramps are located along the southern portion of the property. The proposed taller building heights will be located closer to the transportation facilities and away from the residential neighborhoods to the north. The site will feature buildings of varying heights. The maximum building height, generally located along the south edge of the property, will be 165 feet, e.g., a maximum of 12 stories at 15 feet per story. Additional setbacks have been established for buildings taller than 50 feet. South of Kyoto Gardens Drive, a 50 -foot setback has been proposed and a 50 -foot high building would be limited at that distance from the roadway. For each additional foot of building height above the 50 -foot limit, the setback from Kyoto Gardens Drive will increase by 1.5 feet. As an example, an 80 -foot high building would be located a minimum of 95 feet from Kyoto Gardens Drive right -of- way. A maximum 165 -foot tall building would be located a minimum of 222 feet from the southern Kyoto Gardens Drive right -of -way line. Helistop The applicant is requesting a helistop to be a permitted use, with enhanced setbacks, within Parcel A. The helistop would be limited to the landing and take -off of helicopters visiting the site. The helistop shall not have any facilities associated with the repair, refueling or overnight parking of the helicopter. The helistop will also be located a minimum of 800 feet from any residential neighborhood. This enhanced setback is eight times the required distance between industrial uses and residential areas. Because a helistop is typically a Major Conditional Use, if approved independently of a PCD, the applicant has reviewed those regulations to determine whether the proposal would otherwise meet those criteria. Although not directly applicable as part of a PCD approval, as discussed herein, the proposed helistop would otherwise be independently approvable as a Major Conditional Use. Consistent with Section 78 -52(d) of the City Code, the criteria for reviewing and approving a conditional use have been replicated below and our confirmation of compliance with each criterion follows. In addition to the application requirements listed above, a development order application for a minor or major conditional use approval shall demonstrate compliance with the criteria listed below. (1) Comprehensive plan. The proposed use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The site of the requested PCD Amendment has an Industrial (I) Future Land Use designation. Policy 1.1.1.9. of the Future Land Use Element of the Palm Beach Gardens' Comprehensive Plan April 1, 2013 Page 7 of 15 states that office parks are one of the "predominant uses" of the Industrial designation. The office park proposed by the applicant, Florida Power & Light (FPL), is consistent with this designation. The requested helistop use is a necessary transportation facility for FPL, especially during weather emergencies. The helistop will not be utilized for overnight parking or for refueling, maintenance or repairs. The proposed location of the FPL offices, with its accessory helistop, in Palm Beach Gardens is consistent with the City's economic development goals (such as Goal 13.1 of the Economic Development Element) and objectives (such as Objective 1.3.11 of the Future Land Use Element). For the reasons outlined above, the proposed use is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. (2) Chapter requirements. The proposed use is consistent with all applicable requirements of this chapter. The proposed helistop complies with all City standards, as outlined in the response to Criterion #3 below. The proposed helistop also complies with all setback requirements from residential uses. Section 78 -153 of the City Code requires a minimum 90 to 100 foot setback between industrial uses and residential zoning districts. The applicant is proposing a minimum 800 foot setback for the helistop from the residential zoning district. This is at least eight (8) times the length of the required separation. By setting the helistop so far back from the residential communities, the applicant is helping to mitigate any adverse impacts the use may have. (3) Standards. The proposed use is consistent with the standards for such use as provided in section 78 -159 The proposed helistop will meet the City standards outlined within Section 78 -159, Note 60, as discussed below. Helistops. Helistops shall comply with the requirements listed below. a. Compliance with the requirements of F.S. Chapter 330. The helistop and its use will comply with all applicable federal and state regulations, including F.S. Chapter 330. r. r s r r i i rs 110 i 0 1 0 . r' April 1, 2013 Page 8 of 15 No refueling, maintenance or repairs of helicopters are proposed. Those activities will occur off -site. c. Shall not be utilized for overnight parking of aircraft. No overnight parking of helicopters is proposed. Helicopters serving the project will be parked off -site. d. Shall establish and utilize a standard approach and departure route that minimizes impact on adjacent properties. The Helicopter Association International has established a "Fly Neighborly" program, which is a voluntary noise reduction plan, for its helicopter operators. The highlights of the plan include the following goals: • Fly at an altitude that is as high as practical. • Avoid residential areas when possible. • Fly over industrial areas and major roadways to mask the sound of helicopters. • Avoid late night /early morning flights. • Identify noise sensitive areas and adjust routes to avoid them to the extent possible. The applicant has successfully applied the "Fly Neighborly" program at the Florida Power & Light headquarters in Juno Beach, which is directly adjacent to the Juno Isles and Seminole Country Club residential neighborhoods. Flight routes and heights have been adjusted to minimize any noise experienced by the adjacent neighbors. As a result of implementing the program, FPL enjoys a good relationship with its residential neighbors. The applicant will also implement the "Fly Neighborly" program at the PGA Corporate Center site. e. Shall not be used for commercial purposes, such as regularly- scheduled commercial flights for the transportation of passengers or products. The proposed helistop is proposed for the use of the owner of the site and not for commercial purposes. access: The proposed helistop will not be accessible by the general public and will not be connected to the public sidewalk system. However, pedestrian access will be provided internally to and from the helistop. Please note that the PCD will connect to the public sidewalk system. The proposed helistop will not be open to the public and no public vehicular access to the use is proposed. The helistop will be accessed from the internal office campus on Parcel A. The proposed PGA Office Center PCD meets all traffic concurrency and vehicular access requirements. c. Providing for an adequate roadway system adjacent to and in front of the site; The proposed helistop is not open to the public and no public vehicular access to the use is proposed. It is solely for the use of the owner of Parcel A. Therefore, it will not have any impact on the roadway system separate from the overall PGA Office Center PCD, The PGA Office Center PCD is bisected by two public streets, Kyoto Gardens Drive and RCA Boulevard, which provide direct vehicular access to the site from the surrounding roadway network. The proposed PCD amendment results in less traffic than what is currently approved for the site. As stated, the project meets all traffic concurrency requirements. d. Providing for safe and efficient onsite traffic circulation, parking, and overall control; and The proposed helistop is not open to the public and no public vehicular access to the use is proposed. It is solely for the use of the owner of Parcel A. Therefore, it will not have any impact on the roadway system separate from the overall PGA Office Center PCD. As described above, the majority of traffic improvements required for the approved project and proposed amendment has been constructed. As such, the capacity on the area roadways has been increased prior to the impacts of the approved development. The proposed helistop will not increase the traffic impact of the project. The proposed helistop is an integrated part of the overall PGA Office Center PCD, The City Police and Fire Departments have reviewed the approved PCD and this proposed amendments and have confirmed that they will be able to serve this project, including the proposed helistop. Please note that the proposed helistop will meet all safety requirements with its location and construction. The final location, based on the criteria included in the proposed Design Guidelines, of the helistop will comply with the City's Site Plan Review process. (5) Screening and buffering. The proposed use utilizes such techniques as landscaping, screening, buffering, site or building design, or business operation procedures to mitigate impacts on surrounding properties, including such impacts as: a. Noise; The applicant is proposing several measures to mitigate any potential noise created by the requested helistop use. First and foremost, the applicant is proposing an 800 foot setback from any residential neighborhood. As stated above, this is eight (8) times the City Code - required setback distance between industrial and residential uses within the City. Florida Power & Light has successfully operated a helistop at its Juno Beach campus for numerous years. The Juno Beach campus helistop is located between 560 and 600 feet from three adjacent residential neighborhoods (Seminole Landing, Juno Isles and The Waterford). Flight routes and heights have been adjusted to minimize any noise experienced by the adjacent neighbors. As a result of implementing the program, FPL enjoys a good relationship with its residential neighbors. As discussed earlier, the FPL applies the "Fly Neighborly" program to its use of helicopters. The program calls for helicopters to fly as high as practical and to avoid residential areas. Typically, helicopters used by FPL fly at about 1,500 feet where there would be far less impact that law enforcement, medical or news helicopters, which typically fly at 500 feet. The "Fly Neighborly" program would be implemented for the proposed helistop. As the result of these measures, the proposed use will meet all applicable noise performance standards found in the City's Code of Ordinances. . Glare® The requested use will not cause any glare to any of the surrounding properties. c. Odor; The requested helistop will not create any adverse odor. Please note that no refueling, repairs or maintenance is proposed or will be allowed with this requested use. d. Ground -, wall -, or roof - mounted mechanical equipment; All associated mechanical equipment will be screened from the view of any on -grade public right -of -way. e. Perimeter, interior, and security lighting; Aviation lighting for the helistop will be provided, pursuant to federal safety regulations. No other lighting will be associated with the requested use. f. Signs; No signage is proposed related to the requested helistop. g. Waste disposal and recycling; The requested helistop will not impact waste disposal or recycling on the site as there will not be any refueling or repairs occurring on site. h. Outdoor storage of merchandise and vehicles; No overnight parking or storage of helicopters will be permitted with this requested use. i. Visual impact; and Because of the nature of the requested use, where helicopters need a clear area to take -off and land, the helistop will have no or limited visual impact to surrounding properties. j. Hours of operation. As described above, FPL follows the "Fly Neighborly" program established by the Helicopter Association International. Along with its other noise- reduction practices, the "Fly Neighborly" program calls for the avoidance of late night /early morning flights. During FPL's 25 -year experience with its successful operation of its helistop, non - daytime use have been extremely rare and associated with large, weather emergencies. This is the intent for the requested use within the subject PCD. (7) Dimensional standards. The proposed use meets or exceeds all dimensional requirements required by the chapter. As stated above, the proposed 800 foot setback is eight times larger than the City separation standard between industrial uses and residential zoning districts. The requested use complies with this criterion. (8) Neighborhood plans. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, and standards of neighborhood plans. This criterion is not applicable as there are no neighborhood plans which affect the subject site. (9) Compatibility. The overall compatibility of the proposed development with adjacent and area uses, and character of area development, The subject site is surrounded on three sides by elevated, high - volume, roadways. The requested use is compatible with these other transportation facilities. On the project's northern boundary are the Garden Woods and Winchester Courts residential communities. Extended buffers and setbacks have been provided between the communities and the proposed uses to ensure compatibility. The historical planning for the subject Industrial site and its relationship to the adjacent residential area has provided for an upland preserve and a lake with a heavily landscaped berm on the northern quarter of the project. More than 23 acres of landscaped open space, preserve and lake is located between the residential communities and Kyoto Gardens Drive. In addition, the applicant has committed to an 800 foot setback for the proposed helistop from the residential neighborhood. This setback will insure the helistop will be located in the southern portion of the project, near the adjacent elevated roadways. The buffers and enhanced setbacks confirm the compatibility of the requested use with adjacent and area uses. (10) Patterns of development. The proposed use will result in logical, timely, and orderly development patterns. The requested use will be part of an overall, planned, office park. The development of this office park will follow a logical, timely and orderly development pattern. (11) Purpose and intent. The proposed use will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter and the goals, objectives, and policies of the city. The proposed helistop will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Land Development Regulations which is to provide for the "public health, safety, and welfare of the residents and property owners of the City of Palm Beach Gardens." The helistop is an accessory to the planned FPL office park, which, as noted above, meets the goals, objectives, and policies of the city. (12) Adverse impact. The design of the proposed use and structures will minimize any adverse visual impacts or impacts caused by the intensity of the use. The proposed 800 foot setback from residential areas, the practices of the "Fly Neighborly" program, and the fact that there will be no refueling, repair, or overnight parking will minimize any adverse impacts created by the helistop. (13) Environmental impact. The design of the proposed use minimizes any adverse impacts that may be created, including impacts on environmental and natural resources including air, water, stormwater management, wildlife, vegetation, and wetlands. The requested use will have no adverse impacts to the surrounding environment. Please note that a 10 -acre upland preserve currently exists on the subject site and will remain. Signage As outlined in the proposed Design Guidelines, the PCD will have an attractive and consistent signage program throughout the project. The PCD has more than 11,000 linear feet of frontage. The formula found in the City Sign Code would therefore allow for up to 16 monument signs for the project. Each monument sign will meet City Code requirements with regarding to size and content. The monument signs will be a maximum of 10 feet high and 15 feet wide. Because of the site's unique location adjacent to Interstate 95, PGA Boulevard and Alternate A1A, building signage will be an important component in the creation of the office campus. Each PGA Office Center PCD Amendment April 1, 2013 Project Narrative Page 14 of 15 building within PCD will be allowed to have two building identification /major tenant signs at the top of the building. Each building identification sign /major tenant sign shall be limited in size to 90 square feet. Building identification /major tenant signs at the top of the building shall not face the residential neighborhoods to the north. Each building will also have a tenant /department sign, no higher than the second floor elevation, associated with the entrance to the building. This tenant sign shall be limited to 70 square feet in size. Logos and federally- registered trademarks, style and colors may be permitted within the signage within the project. If buildings within the PCD are linked by covered walkways, pedestal buildings or other structures, each building tower above the building connections shall be considered separate buildings for these signage regulations. The upland preserve requirement for the PCD was satisfied when the City Council adopted Resolution 1, 2001. The resolution designated 10 acres of upland habitat on the subject site for preservation and is depicted as Parcel C on the proposed master plan. Consistent with the approved resolution, the 10 -acre area satisfies the upland preservation requirements for this site, the PGA Professional & Design Center (Parcel 513), and the Legacy Place project. Landscape Buffers The applicant is proposing 25 -foot landscape buffers around the majority of the PCD perimeter, unless a lake or upland preserve is provided. Along the eastern boundary of the site, adjacent to the Florida East Coast railway, a 20 -foot wide buffer is proposed. An 8 -foot wide landscape buffer is proposed along adjacent parcels. Along Kyoto Gardens Drive, RCA Center Drive, and the access easement, a 15 -foot wide landscape buffer is proposed. The Design Guidelines proposes that landscaping with the PCD be 90% native plant material. Proposed landscaping will be provided in an informal, campus style with clusters of landscaping and defined green spaces. Proposed shade trees will be located along pedestrian areas which are not sheltered by other means. it Permitted uses within the PGA Office Center Planned Community Development shall include: Urban Planning and Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics PGA Office Center PCD Use Listing P = Permitted C* = Conditional Major C = Conditional Minor Accessory Commercial/ Cafeteria /Restaurant Space P Accessory Helistop (located 800 feet from residentially -zoned land) P Accessory Medical office P Employee Health Center (including clinic, fitness center, employee assistance programs and other health - related facilities within the office campus. Not available to the general public.) P Office P Data Center p Data Processing Service P Laboratory, Dental or Medical P Laboratory, Research and Development P Lift Stations P Medical and Dental supply Sales P Office, Professional and Business P Orthopedic Brace Manufacturing and Repair P Passenger Station C* Picture Framing P Printing and Publishing P Professional Office P Radio /Television Broadcast Studio P Restaurant, General P Satellite College or University C Satellite Dishes and other Telecommunications Equipment P Schools, Public and Private C* Travel Agency P Utilities, Minor (including electrical substation for Primary Campus) P Utility Plant and Major Substation C* Wireless Tele- communication Facilities P NOTE: All uses shall comply with the approved Design Guidelines and applicable sections of the City's Land Development Regulations. IP Jr ., PI, CD ce nt r P,i e e w 7 Desi gn ui a es 1. i f � � u - - i� w AMA April 2013 I IM GS P A. SITE PLANNING DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. PURPOSE AND INTENT ............................................ ............................... 7 2. DEFINITIONS .............................................................. ..............................7 2. SCOPE, APPLICABILITY AND EFFECT ................... ............................... 3. DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS .............................. ............................... 8 a. Amendments ............................................................. .............................10 4. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ....................................... ............................... 4. PARKING ...................................................................... .............................10 a. Parking Ratios .......................................................... .............................10 20 b. Passenger Stations ................................................... .............................10 20 c. Parking Dimensions .................................................. .............................10 21 5. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ......................................... .............................10 22 6. HELISTOP ..................................................................... .............................11 22 7. LANDSCAPING ............................................................ .............................11 22 a. Buffers ...................................................................... .............................11 22 b. Preserve ................................................................... .............................11 23 c. Foundation Landscaping .......................................... .............................11 d. Site Landscaping ...................................................... .............................11 23 8. LINKAGES .................................................................... .............................11 23 9. LIGHTING ..................................................................... .............................12 10. SIGNAGE ................................................................. ............................... 12 a. Monument Signage .................................................. .............................12 b. Wall Signage .......................................................... ............................... 12 c. Logos ..................................................................... ............................... 12 11. SUSTAINABILITY MEASURES .................................. .............................12 B. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. PURPOSE AND INTENT ....................................... ............................... 19 2. SCOPE, APPLICABILITY AND EFFECT ................... ............................... 19 3. BUILDING DESIGN PRINCIPLES ............................. ............................... 19 4. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ....................................... ............................... 20 a. Building Design Elements ...................................... ............................... 20 1. Facade /wall height transition .......................... ............................... 20 2. Design Treatments ......................................... ............................... 21 3. Preferred building exterior wall materials ....... ............................... 22 4. Pedestrian Entrances ..................................... ............................... 22 5. Gutters and downspouts ................................ ............................... 22 6. Covered parking structures ............................ ............................... 22 b. Preferred Roof Styles ............................................ ............................... 23 1. Mansard roofs .................................................... .............................23 2. Roof Treatments .............................................. ............................... 23 c. Materials for Sloped Roof Areas ............................ ............................... 23 d. Building Colors ......................................................... .............................23 5. PARKING GARAGES ................................................... .............................23 • r� • I.gklt� r 16. rte- . r r � C R � � w � jf K7 SECTION A.1 - PURPOSE AND INTENT The purpose and intent of these Design Guidelines is to create the development standards to facilitate the creation of the PGA Office Center Planned Community District as an attractive, quality, sustainable, and efficient office campus within the City. The PCD will consist of a large Primary Campus over the majority of the site. In creating the overall campus environment, these guidelines provide and encourage pedestrian use, plentiful open space and expanded setbacks in order to ensure a quality development. Pedestrian gathering areas will be provided within protected areas either within buildings or under canopies or shade trees. The campus will feature building separation, setback, and open space standards in excess of City Code requirements. In addition, specific setback and height requirements within these Guidelines will promote the tiering of building heights. It is the intent of the campus to engage the employees and provide a positive visitor experience through qualitative and sustainable design elements. The goal of these development regulations is to create a framework for an attractive and efficient campus setting for the variety of uses that comprise an office setting. The campus and outparcels will be designed to facilitate economic activities while limiting negative impacts to adjacent properties and the public right of way. Graphics and photographs within this document are strictly examples to illustrate design concepts or standards. SECTION A.2 - DEFINITIONS a. Accessory Uses - A use or structure on the same lot with and of a nature customarily incidental and subordinate to the principal use or structure. b. Building Height - Building heights shall be measured from grade to the top of roof structure for flat roofs or the midpoint of roof structure for sloped roofs. The height restriction within these guidelines shall not include spires, silos, antennas, penthouses and domes not used for human occupancy, nor to chimneys, water tanks, architectural design features and necessary mechanical appurtenances usually carried above the roof level and any parapets and screening, if necessary, for these features. These features, however, shall be erected only to a height as is necessary to accomplish the purpose they are to serve and shall be limited to the City Code standard of 20% of building footprint. c. City- City of Palm Beach Gardens. d. Lot lines -The lines creating or forming the boundary of a lot as follows: • Front lot line means the lot line fronting the street right -of -way, except, in the case of a corner lot, the shortest lot line adjacent to a street right -of -way shall be the front lot line. • Rear lot line means the lot line opposite the front lot line. In the case of a lot irregularly shaped or pointed at the rear, the rear lot line shall be an imaginary line within the lot, not less than ten feet long, parallel to and at the maximum distance from the front lot line. • Side lot line means any lot line other than the front lot line or rear lot line. Aside lot line located on a street right -of -way is a side corner lot line. A side lot line separating a lot from another lot is an interior side lot line. e. Primary Campus -Parcel A as identified within the PGA Office Center PCD Master Plan. f. Setbacks -A required open space unoccupied and unobstructed by any structure or portion of a structure above the general ground level of the graded lot upward, except for fences, walls, and other customary yard accessories as provided in these regulations. Setbacks to be measured from right -of -way lines, lot lines, property lines and access easement lines. g. Tenant Signage - Signage for the purpose of identifying individual occupants within a building or departments or subdivisions within a larger campus for one user. SECTION A.3 - DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS The PCD shall consist of one large, primary campus (Parcel A) with surrounding outparcels which are separated from the campus by either a public right -of -way, access easement or separate ownership. Due to its location adjacent to Interstate 95, PGA Boulevard, Alternate A1A and the associated flyovers, building height beyond that allowed in the underlying zoning category is appropriate within the Primary Campus. As indicated in -able A.1, additional building height is dependent upon specific criteria regarding lot size, additional Aft as I Graphic Table A.1 -Property Development Regulations Property Development PGA Office Center PCD Regulation Min. Building Site Area 1 Acre Minimum Lot Width 100 feet Minimum Lot Depth 200 feet Max. Lot Coverage 40% for PCD 60% per par cel Min. Open Space 40% for PCD 15% per parcel Max. Building Height (Ft) • Buildings on parcels less than 5 acres in size are limited to 90 feet in height. • Buildings on parcels 5 acres and larger and meeting the required setbacks may be up to 165 feet in height. Min. Building Setback from 400 feet Residential District Setbacks for Parcels less than 5 acres in size Front 30 feet Side 30 feet Side (Street Facing) 30 feet Rear 30 feet Setbacks for Parcels greater than 5 acres in size Front 50 feet from Kyoto Gardens Drive Side 30 feet Side (Street Facing) 30 feet from PGA Boulevard, Interstate 95, RCA Center Drive, Alternate A1A, and access easement lines. Rear 30 feet Additional setbacks South from the Kyoto Gardens Drive right -of -way; for building heights taller than • A maximum 50 -foot high building at 50 -foot setback 50 feet. 0 For each additional foot of building height above 50 feet, the setback from Kyoto Gardens Drive shall increase 1.5 feet. As an example, an 80 -foot high building would be located a minimum of 95 feet from the Kyoto Gardens Drive. A maximum 165 -foot tall building would be setback a minimum of 222.5 feet. Reference Graphic A.4.1 From Interstate 95, PGA Boulevard. and RCA Center Drive rights -of -way: • A maximum 50 -foot high building at the 30 -foot setback • A maximum 165 foot high at 75 -foot setback Reference Graphic A.4.2 From 30 -foot wide access easement and internal lot lines: • 50 -feet high at 30 -foot setback • For each additional 1.5 feet of building height above 50 feet, the setback shall increase by one foot. For example, a 165 -foot high building would be set back a minimum of 106.6 feet. Reference Graphic A.4.3 setbacks and separation from residential districts. All buildings within the PCD shall be separated from any residential zoning district by a minimum 400 linear feet. Additional building height as permitted will be mitigated through increased setbacks as described herein. Section A.3.a -Amendments The provisions of the PGA Office Center PCD, including these Design Guidelines, may be amended with the approval of the property owner. Review of the amendment shall conform to the criteria and standards found in Section 78 -49 of the City Code. SECTION A.4 - PARKING ,ection A.4.a - Parking Ratios Parking for buildings within the PCD shall be provided at a ratio of one (1) parking space per 300 square feet of allowable gross floor area. Parking facilities may be constructed to serve multiple buildings, including future buildings. At no time, shall the number of parking spaces exceed 110% of the project's overall parking requirement. Section A.4.b - Passenger Stations If a passenger station is constructed within % mile of the PCD, (See Graphic A.11.1) the applicant may provide a parking study to determine an updated parking requirement. The parking study shall be conducted buy an engineer, registered in the State of Florida, and implemented through the site plan approval process. Section A.4.c - Parking Dimensions Dimensions of parking spaces within the project hall be a minimum of 9 -feet in width. All parking spaces shall be a minimum of 9 feet x 18.5 feet 10 with 26 foot drive aisle. Other parking dimensions shall comply with City parking space standards. Parking spaces shall be single- striped or, with the approval of the City Engineer, delineated by contrasting paving materials. SECTION A.5 - MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT & SITE ELEMENTS a. Covered parking structures shall comply with Section 78 -374 of the City Code or seek approval from the City for any deviations from the City standard. b. Any public telephones, vending machines, newspaper racks, and facilities dispensing merchandise or services on private property should be screened from public view with a physical structure orlandscaping. Landscaping and design of screen walls should be compatible with the materials of the principal structure. Any newspaper racks shall comply with all the requirements of the applicable sections of the City Code. c. Loading areas, service areas, solid waste, recycling facilities and otherservice areas should be placed to the rear or side of the building in visually unobtrusive locations. Screening should prevent direct views of these service areas and their driveways from adjacent properties and from public rights of way. Screening and buffering to visually obscure the service area contents and facilities should be achieved through the use of walls, fences, and landscaping. d. All refuse and waste containers, recycling or compacting containers, dumpsters, oil tanks, bottled gas tanks, service yards, storage yards, and loading docks should be located in the rear or side areas of buildings. All such service equipment and service areas should be screened from view from adjoining properties and public right of ways by means of a wall, landscaping, or other methods approved by the City. SECTION A.6 - HELISTOP A helistop is a permitted use on the Primary Campus and shall be limited to the landing and take -off of helicopters visiting the site. The helistop shall be setback from the northern boundary of the PCD by a minimum of 800 linear feet. The helistop shall not have any facilities associated with the repair, refueling or overnight parking of the helicopter. The use of the helistop shall comply with the applicable provisions of the Florida Statutes Chapter 330. SECTION A.7 - LANDSCAPING Ninety percent of the trees and shrubs on site shall be of a native species. Landscaping shall be provided in an informal, campus style with clusters of landscaping and defined green spaces. Shade trees shall be provided along unsheltered pedestrian areas. Section A.7.a - Buffers Landscape buffers shall comply with the approved PCD buffer sections. Section A.7.b - Preserve The adoption of Resolution 1, 2001 on February 1, 2001 established the required upland preserve area for the site, along with Parcels 5B and 28.01. The resolution identified the 10 -acre preserve area at the northeast corner of the site. The approved 10 -acre preserve area shall be maintained and no additional preservation is required. Section A.7.c - Foundation Landscaping At least one shade tree or palm cluster shall be installed for each 30 linear feet, or fraction thereof, of facade width. A minimum of one tree per facade shall be planted, and the remainder of the landscape area shall be treated appropriately with plantings and pedestrian accessways. Trees and palms shall be of an installed size relating to the height of the adjacent wall or fagade. Fagades of 25 feet or less in height shall provide shade trees 14 feet or less in height or palms 14 to 18 feet in height. Facades of 26 feet or more shall provide shade trees 18 feet in height or palms 22 to 28 feet in height. Foundation planting beds shall be a minimum of 5 feet for one -story buildings and 10 feet for multi -story buildings. Section A.7.d - Site Landscaping Unless otherwise described within these Design Guidelines, landscaping within each parcel shall conform with the City Landscape Code. SECTION A.8 - LINKAGES In order to maintain a secure and safe campus, the pedestrian and vehicular linkages within the project will have security clearance locations. This will create two distinctive, but inter - related, linkage systems within the project: public and private. Vehicular access to the site will be restricted to curb cuts from the internal roadway system consisting of Kyoto Gardens Drive and RCA Center Drive. No direct vehicular access will be provided from Interstate 95, PGA Boulevard or Alternate A1A. The curb cuts from Kyoto Gardens Drive and RCA Center Drive will lead to internal driveways and access easements. Each driveway and access easement from the adjacent roadway system shall have at least one sidewalk, a minimum of five feet in width, consistent with Kyoto Gardens Drive. Driveway and access easement widths shall conform to City unless waived during the site plan review process. Each building's main entrance shall be connected via sidewalks to the project's pedestrian system and ultimately to the City's public pedestrian network. SECTION A.9 - LIGHTING Lighting within the PCD for pedestrian and vehicular areas will conform with the following tandards: • 1.5 footcandle average; • 0.6 footcandle minimum; • and 10.0 footcandle maximum. Unless addressed above, lighting within the PCD shall comply with the City's lighting regulations found in Section 78 -182 of the Land Development Regulations at the time of the PCD approval. SECTION A.10 - SIGNAGE Section A.10.a - Monument Signage The PCD shall have a consistent signage program throughoutthe project. The PCD may have up to 16 monument signs for the project. Each monument sign shall meet City Code requirements with regard to size and content. Parcels less than five (5) acres in size are permitted one (1) monument sign per parcel. Section A.10.b - Wall Signage Because of the site's unique location adjacent to Interstate 95, PGA Boulevard and Alternate A1A, building signage is an important component in the creation of the office campus. Each building within the PCD shall be allowed to have two building identification /major tenant signs at the top of the building. Each building identification sign /major tenant sign shall be limited in size to 90 square feet. Building identification /major tenant signs at the top of the building shall not face the residential neighborhoods to the north. Each building may also have a tenant sign, no higher than the second floor elevation, associated with the entrance to the building. This tenant sign shall be limited to 70 square feet in size. Section A.10.c - Logos Logos and federally- registered trademarks, styles and /or colors are permitted within any sign. If buildings within the PCD are linked by covered walkways, podium buildings or other structures, each building tower above the podium shall be considered separate buildings for the purposes of these signage regulations. (Reference Illustrative Graphic B.4.2 ) SECTION A.11 - SUSTAINABILITY MEASURES It is the desire of the Applicant to incorporate energy- efficient and sustainability measures within the PGA Office Center PCD master plan. To achieve this goal, each parcel within the PCD shall incorporate at least four (4) of the following sustainability measures. a. Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Reduce pollution from construction activities by controlling soil erosion, waterway sedimentation and airborne dust generation. Create an erosion and sedimentation control plan for implementation during construction of the project. b. Public Transportation Access Buildings are located within 1/2 -mile distance of an existing or planned and funded commuter rail, light rail or subway station or buildings are located within 1/4 -mile distance of one ormore stops for public, campus, or private bus lines usable by building occupants. (Reference Illustrative Graphic A.11.1 for 1/4 and 1/2 mile offsets) c. Bicycle Storage and Changing Rooms Provide secure bicycle racks and /or storage within the project for building users; and provide shower and changing facilities within the primary campus. d. Low - Emission and Fuel- Efficient Vehicles Provide transportation amenities such as alternative -fuel refueling stations or preferred parking for low- emission and fuel- efficient vehicles. e. Parking Capacity Minimize parking lot/garage size by meeting but not exceeding minimum local zoning requirements, and /or provide preferred parking for carpools or vanpools. f. Maximize Open Space Select a suitable building location and design the building footprint to minimize site disruption. Strategies include stacking the building program and tuck -under parking to maximize the amount of open space on the site. Reduce the development footprint and /or provide vegetated open space within the project boundary such that the amount of open space meets or exceeds 25 %. g. Stormwater Design — Quantity Control Implement two (2) of the following: • Limit disruption of natural hydrology by either reducing impervious cover, increasing on -site infiltration, reducing or eliminating pollution from stormwater runoff/ contaminants. • Implement a stormwater management plan that prevents the post development peak discharge rate and quantity from exceeding the predevelopment peak discharge rate and quantity for the one and two year 24- hour storm events. • Design the project site to maintain natural stormwater flows by promoting infiltration. • Specify vegetated roofs, pervious paving and other measures to minimize impervious surfaces. • Reuse stormwater for non - potable uses such as landscape irrigation, toilet and urinal flushing, and custodial uses. h. Stormwater Design — Quality Control Limit disruption and pollution of natural water flows by managing stormwater runoff. Implement a stormwater management plan that reduces impervious cover, promotes infiltration and captures and treats the stormwater runoff from 90% of the average annual rainfall using acceptable best management practices. Heat Island Effect — Non -roof Place a minimum of 50% of parking spaces under cover with any roof used to shade or cover parking to have a solar reflectance index (SRI) of at least 29, or be a vegetated green roof or be covered by solar panels. Alternatively, provide shade over 50% of the site hardscape, and /or provide shade from structures covered by solar panels that produce energy; and /or provide shade from architectural devices or structures that have an SRI of at least 29; and/ or use hardscape materials with an SRI of at least 29; and /or use an open -grid pavement system (at least 50% pervious). Heat Island Effect —Roof Minimize impacts on microclimates and human and wildlife habitats by installing light- colored, vegetated, or reflective roofs or solar panels to reduce heat absorption. Covered parking structures shall comply with Section 78 -374 of the City Code or seek approval from the City for any deviations from the City standard. Light Pollution Reduction Minimize light trespass from the building and site, reduce sky -glow to increase night sky access, improve nighttime visibility through glare reduction and reduce development impact from lighting on nocturnal environments. Adopt site lighting criteria to maintain safe light levels while avoiding off -site lighting and night sky pollution. Minimize site lighting where possible, and use computer software to model the site lighting. Utilize technologies to reduce light pollution, such as full cutoff luminaires, low- reflectance surfaces and low -angle spotlights. Water Use Reduction Employ strategies that, in aggregate, use 20% less water than the water use baseline calculated for the building (not including irrigation). This may be achieved through the use of high - efficiency fixtures (e.g., water closets and urinals) and dry fixtures to reduce potable water demand. WaterSense- certified fixtures and fixture fittings should be used where available. Consider using alternative on -site sources of water (e.g., rainwater, stormwater, and air conditioner condensate) and graywater for nonpotable applications, such as custodial uses and toilet and urinal flushing. m. Water Efficient Landscaping Reduce potable water consumption for irrigation by 50% from a calculated midsummer baseline case. Perform a soil /climate analysis to determine appropriate plant material and design the landscape with native or adapted plants to reduce or eliminate irrigation requirements. Where irrigation is required, use high - efficiency equipment and /or climate - based controllers. n. Innovative Wastewater Technologies Thirty (30 %) of the landscaped area associated with the building shall use drought - tolerant plantings that require limited or no irrigation. When used, irrigation systems shall use high - efficiency equipment and /or climate -based controllers. Alternatively, this criterion is met by the use of reclaimed water for landscaping irrigation. i A x _ _ INV ��� �� -fib- ,�'�;�"�P,:,• ���I�,.'��` ���11,� � SECTION 41. RC 'HITEC7TURALD IGN GDELINES ­ .- e � r i ,�* � -•.�� r fir• 4..e - r + �C _ v r� `ts � �T A SECTION B.1 - PURPOSE AND INTENT The purpose and intent of these Architectural Design Guidelines is to provide the parameters for the quality development of a harmonious architectural style or styles within the PGA Office Center PCD. It is the intent of these Guidelines to ensure a desired degree of design consistency and compatibility with regard to the overall architectural style, including colors, materials and details. These guidelines provide options of desirable architectural treatments which will assist building designers to formulate creative and innovative solutions for future project designs rather than imposing a specific intention. Graphics and photographs within this document are strictly examples to illustrate design concepts or standards. These Guidelines identify the architectural standards and requirements which will apply to the PCD throughout its development. The applicability of various architectural design standards will be determined based on function, security and prominence of each particular building. The architectural style detailed within the submittal of the initial architectural plans for Parcel A shall continue through the development of that parcel and all outparcels. SECTION B.2 - SCOPE, APPLICABILITY AND EFFECT These Guidelines shall apply to all commercial and office uses within the overall PCD, including Parcel A, Parcel B, and any other future outparcels. SECTION B.3 - BUILDING DESIGN PRINCIPLES Illustrative Graphic 13.3.1 a. Buildings shall have architectural features and patterns that provide visual interest. Facades should be designed to break down large elements of mass & scale where appropriate. Building wall offsets, including projections, recesses, etc., shall be used to add architectural interest and variety, and to relieve the visual effect of large blank walls (See Illustrative Graphic B.3.1 for an example of building projections and recesses) b. Exterior (public and semi - public) spaces, such Illustrative Graphic 13.3.2 as courtyards and plazas, shall be designed to enhance the surrounding buildings and to include pedestrian amenities, such as landscaping, art, lakes, benches, trellises, gazebos, and /or fountains, etc. (See Illustrative Graphic B.3.2 for and example of exterior spaces) c. Building facades shall be designed to be harmonious with their surroundings. Harmony shall be achieved through the appropriate use of scale, proportion, materials, texture, and color. d. Buildings shall relate to adjacent public spaces by providing a variety of entries, windows, indentations, and /or balconies along public pathways. Ground floor facades should have an appropriate degree of visual "transparency" to encourage interaction between external activities and those activities within the building. e. Buildings should reinforce a "human scale" in details and massing at the lower levels. f. Appropriate portions of building exteriors should provide for relief from extensive summer sun exposures. The use of special glazing systems, sun shades, porticos, awnings, arcades, and roof overhangs can be used as appropriate. (See Illustrative Graphic B.3.3 for an example of possible shading techniques) g. Building massing shall be used to emphasize the location of primary building entries. For example, greater height can be used to accentuate entries in the form of tower elements, facade indentations, and /or special architectural features. h. Buildings or structures that are part of an un- built Phase shall have character and design that is compatible with the positive design features of an adjacent existing building as appropriate. i. Buildings shall provide transitions to adjacent buildings in a compatible manner. Examples of this include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Harmonizing the scale of buildings by the use of gradual changes in height and form; 2. Creating unifying horizontal base massing elements at one or more floors - that link adjacent buildings; 3. Creating horizontal lines of fenestration to create architectural banding that brings the appearance of two buildings together All building elevations or portions thereof facing public Rights of Way should receive design treatment as generally outlined in these Guidelines, including architectural elements, facade treatments and landscaping. This does not apply to building elements that are internal or that are suitably screened from public view such as internal buildings, loading and service areas, etc. SECTION B.4 -ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN Section B.4.a. - Building Design Elements Section B.4.a.1 - Facade/Wall Height Transition AL Buildings that are located within 100' of other buildings, and that are more than twice the height of the adjacent building, should provide intermediate massing elements to provide a transition in height between the existing buildings of lower height and the taller building. (See Illustrative Graphic B.4.1 & B.4.2 for an example of building height transitions) Section BAa.2 - Design Treatments In addition to the basic design requirements in these Guidelines, buildings within a given phase of the PCD shall incorporate a minimum of four BLDG. B 75' Optional Podium Building Element "Dimension for example only Illustrative Exterior Elevation: "Facade/Wall Height Transition" (NTS) Illustrative Graphic 13.4.2 Illustrative Graphic 13.4.4 of the following design elements (these elements could be included on any of the buildings within a given Phase): a. Canopies or porticos, integrated with the building's massing and /or extensive overhangs proportional in size to the mass of the building; b. Covered pedestrian arcades, with minimum eight feet (8') of clear width; (See Illustrative Graphic B.4.3 for an example of covered pedestrian arcades) c. Pitched roof forms over special architectural elements incorporating roof elements such as gable and /or hip roofs; (See Illustrative Graphic B.4.4 for an example of incorporating special roof elements) d. Decorative ornamental and /or structural architectural elements, which are integrated into the building structure and overall design (such as ornamental grille work, sun screens, etc); (See Illustrative Graphic B.4.5 for an example of decorative elements) 75 "or more (orgreater than 50% BLDG. A Transitional of Bldg. A height) 150'' e ementt's—\ �r BLDG. B 75' Optional Podium Building Element "Dimension for example only Illustrative Exterior Elevation: "Facade/Wall Height Transition" (NTS) Illustrative Graphic 13.4.2 Illustrative Graphic 13.4.4 of the following design elements (these elements could be included on any of the buildings within a given Phase): a. Canopies or porticos, integrated with the building's massing and /or extensive overhangs proportional in size to the mass of the building; b. Covered pedestrian arcades, with minimum eight feet (8') of clear width; (See Illustrative Graphic B.4.3 for an example of covered pedestrian arcades) c. Pitched roof forms over special architectural elements incorporating roof elements such as gable and /or hip roofs; (See Illustrative Graphic B.4.4 for an example of incorporating special roof elements) d. Decorative ornamental and /or structural architectural elements, which are integrated into the building structure and overall design (such as ornamental grille work, sun screens, etc); (See Illustrative Graphic B.4.5 for an example of decorative elements) Illustrative Graphic 13.4.5 I i e. Decorative tower elements; f. Articulated exterior facades involving appreciable vertical and horizontal articulation; g. Amply sized window openings on appropriate elevations facing open public spaces; h. The use of at least four basic architectural materials; The use of at least 4 building material colors. For example: two colors of stucco, 1 color of glass, and 1 color of trim would meet this requirement. (See Illustrative Graphic B.4.4 for an example of building color use) Any other architectural treatment that meets the intent of this section, as determined by the City Section B.4.a.3 - Preferred building exterior materials The following are preferred materials to be used for building exteriors: a. Stucco (textured or smooth); b. Natural stone; c. Architectural pre -cast concrete; d. High quality decorative metal or porcelain panel systems, not including metal siding or pre- fabricated metal structure e. Glass - Clear, tinted or reflective f. Brick: in limited quantities - less than 20% of building elevation; Wood or simulated (cementitious) wood: in limited quantities - less than 20% of building elevation h. EIFS (Exterior Installation & Finishing Systems) - Accents and trim may be provided with EIFS Section B.4.a.4 - Pedestrian Entrances Primary building entrances should be emphasized and should have clearlydefined, highly - visible user entrances that include appropriate plaza areas (in proportion to the building size) that incorporate one or more of the following elements: a. Benches or other seating components; b. Decorative landscape planters; c. Structural or vegetative shading elements Section B.4.a.5 - Gutters and Downspouts While internal roof drainage systems are preferred, gutters and downspouts may be used at the exterior facades of buildings which are not visible to public Rights of Way. When used, they should be routed internally where feasible. However, if attached to the wall of a building, they should be painted to match the surface to which they are attached, and organized to reinforce the rhythm of any architectural treatment on that wall such as reveals on expansion joints. Section B.4.a.6 - Covered parking structures The design of any freestanding, covered parking structures, etc. should include aesthetically pleasing materials. Well- proportioned support columns of permanent material, such as masonry/ concrete should be used. Long, extended stand- alone carports are discouraged. Multi -level parking is permitted under buildings less than three (3) stories in height. No multi -level parking shall be located under buildings of three (3) or more stories in height. Covered parking structures shall comply with Section 78 -374 of the City Code or seek approval from the City for any deviations from the City standard. Section B.4.b - Preferred Roof Styles Section B.4.b.1 - Mansard Roofs Mansard roofs are strongly discouraged Section B.4.b.2 - Roof Treatments Variations in roof lines should be used to add interest to and reduce the mass of buildings higher than 50 feet. Sloped roof features should be in proportion with a building's mass and should complement the style /character of that building. Roofing should be constructed of durable, high - quality materials in order to enhance the appearance and attractiveness of the architecture. Section B.4.c - Materials for sloped roof areas 1. The following are preferred materials for sloped roofs: a. Glazed or unglazed ceramic tile; b. Concrete or clay tile; c. Slate; d. Pre - finished metal roofing panels 2. The following are discouraged materials for sloped roofs: a. Asphalt shingles; b. Wood shakes; c. Rustic metal roofing Section B.4.d - Building Colors 1. Building materials and colors should be selected from a complimentary family, and should minimize stark contrasts, unless part of a specific design /color theme. 2. Color transitions should occur, whenever possible, at inside building corners, as opposed to exterior corners. SECTION B.5 - PARKING GARAGES a. Parking Garages are encouraged to be designed to increase open green space. The design of parking garages should include plan and design considerations that soften the large massing effect as much as possible, while maintaining the efficiency of economical garage design and the benefits of open space. b. Exterior facades of parking garages should be designed to break up any long building planes with design features at least once every 100 feet, using elements such as nominal architectural projections, projected trellises or planters, decorative metal components, etc. The exterior edge at the top floor or roof line should also be varied in order to break the horizontal plane- at least once every 100 feet - using similar elements. Larger garage footprints should utilize insets and offsets at building corners (where parking spaces are not required)- in order to soften the massing impact of large garage buildings. c. A top, unroofed, parking level of any parking garage shall provide shade trees in pots or planters. The minimum shade tree spacing for top level of the garage shall be that the center of any parking space is not more than 40 feet from the center of the shade tree. If any top level of a garage includes solar technology in the future, the garage shall be excluded from this landscaping requirement. d. Lighting shall be oriented towards the interior of the garage floor areas- both at the roof level as well as at typical floors- in order to block direct views of lighting sources along exterior openings. e. At least one shade tree or palm cluster shall be installed for each 30 linear feet, or fraction thereof, of parking garage facade width. A minimum of one tree per facade shall be planted, and the remainder of the landscape area shall be treated appropriately with plantings and pedestrian accessways. Trees and palms shall be of an installed size relating to the height of the adjacent wall or fagade. Fagades of 25 feet or less in height shall provide shade trees 14 feet or less in height or palms 14 to 18 feet in height. Facades of 26 feet or more shall provide shade trees 18 feet in height or palms 22 to 28 feet in height. f. Exterior elevations on parking garages shall utilize a variety of materials and /or colors. Understanding that the primary material is likely to be painted or coated concrete, there should be accents of other materials including decorative metals, textured stucco or precast concrete, natural stone, or other materials approved by the City. A\ r L40 rn 't I I I I I I I I Site Data I i II ,a SV[eAET°Mn IPa n1PCiiEx VWRS,aEMaFASEW%r ali,J,k uNOSCAPa - Parcel "B° a° a rPaR 4.25 ACRES GrmP.YFYY� v �Eti.uv X Current Zoning PCD (Mt) Proposed Zoning PCD (M1) Current Land Use Winchester Courts,-- Proposed Land Use (1) Industrial & (ROS) - Zoning RM - - 1/42 S/42 E I i -� - an Use RL Land U - _ � tM r o Y �-r w -11�� -a1 ■ -,.' =� -� f-- o-o-rF �11�7� ." ■ N'sRUU'xAnx - - - - -_ / wA,mssEw�°Oa+E.isu _ --- _ - -� 2 mPtl"1Ee`wsen T-T Checked By. KT ch-k A f W Parcel D W � ' Lake �B9nACP�VarAW 1125.11 NAM MEW REVIEW 1 / 10.82 ACRES / as I, w ParcelD �� _ ��wprrxraeaerr (ROS) um Land Open Space Future Land Use Category 01.12.12 SCM Subm %PCA Amendment 05.07.12 SCM Resubmit MID Amendment nA r ACRES` �Y ASV,ett N+lemi 11.48 p3FiFAR4n � 1 1 E ll 1 i Y 0 7 0 �aa ,Atwo - c / ,sMSaAG`- mN.°PeR, I i II ,a SV[eAET°Mn IPa n1PCiiEx VWRS,aEMaFASEW%r ali,J,k uNOSCAPa - Parcel "B° a° a rPaR 4.25 ACRES GrmP.YFYY� v �Eti.uv X Current Zoning PCD (Mt) Proposed Zoning PCD (M1) Current Land Use (1) Industrial & (ROS) Proposed Land Use (1) Industrial & (ROS) Total Site Area 86.34 Ac. Section/Township /Range 1/42 S/42 E i i 6/42 S/43 E Site Area Breakdown urban design 36 �, kilday 7 Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture _ Communication Graphics _A \ The Lobs at City Place 477S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 I I i oaP.iosAA.Pa�ilis \ \ \ \ \ C21 °s.u\ P 561- 366 -1100 \ \e.7,1�isR'aw l F 561 -366 -1111 www.udkstudioscom wng s�FWei EnsFUErn \ \ \ \ All 9ht 1yS110.PAW � I \ \ wit BsaWA, 'sV All ntl yns, amn0emenls,andplans i \ _a nm.wlul yAW=aAaee rep.es W b.peny., tId-jarepnd by \ \ axsauPawl ana the property pr,ned�iBner, ana wRre Parcel C : °A _' °�;�� createtlfmMeeaptpslvepaep,Ne , pedficl � °A8,�4W.,9r project Thex itleas, tlesigns, artanganenls or glare shall not be used by, er disclosed SNMmx a- o \aE�W Preserve and Open Space 11.01 AC. °u AWN1T o�rSynw, FASNEM ENS RIGHT OF WAY �PoVE �" KYOTO GARDENS DR. AND z RCA CENTER DRIVE = 7.99 AC.- -/ Parcels 'aY byL 13iMb'- r'rNLw 1 (' WARAAmE£Afx 6FrLEASm AIfM1EA 1aB.:iF1B.V 49nEWWf YOp 10.Oj ale' AilmfAi dt11,PG.111 unNY ASE,FM�! �3 I: 1 �PaA1fIDF5FNM1TUnM' ° 1 Te SE " AMal a.4Aen aeFASFD Ar pFP1AT PBnI,A4mmAEAaB3FA1A@�F 4.25 Ac. i lI n � 1r5,6A � fSrygtPr can A,PHNi nI aSENNSruIUn�' rFAA N.AE r Pit -rr I! ' I Aa'r'A'�AianAT ii w. ®asaa.�exT.r� Parcel "A' i i 50.78 ACRES (1) Industrial Future Land Use Category @S:NIyW(Nn11Y WAIFNARWFAedAFxr P.e,n wnlroeE� I ,I SrN1YFA5 EM 1P i 4� . 1 i0 PB mE�r nr _"To. RaFAS®ATREnAT .. .. �a.Pfq61F�5599 I �!/ aaasm - � N ,`9VLM51 bMf��1y' p,Prwva --:: RwrenSY ".I" �B.cer ArtEssEnnrAa>tnr 2 mPtl"1Ee`wsen T-T Checked By. KT ch-k i ii >IA,�PEw�FA�Em Parcels .a/ Parcel A - 50.78 Ac. Parcel B - 4.25 Ac. Parcel C (Upland Preserve and Open Space) -11.01 Ac. Parcel D (Lakes) - 12 "30 Ac. Rights of Way 7.99 Ac. Total (Per Plat) 86.34 Ac. g,ANSC.PE I P81,�PG.1n.Ai AAE -- yppnFpPIXH16AATF E�pAa;P �amslsarmlAl -_ - --L/ ax�Ar�AWw�E ySrAmunn,m'[AmRrtE, �I pwCµ /, $ 1 u,Y FASEMI A�hS� II � l/ P8111. v^s / P1.It PG111 Open Space Calculations Total Site Area 86.34 Ac. Required Open Space (20% Min. Required) 15.67 Ac. (Open Space C Iwlatlen does net include 7. %acres of dedicated ROW)) Provided Open Space 31.55 Ac. (40.3 %) Preserve Area 10.00 Ac. Lakes and Open Spam Tracts 13.31 Ac. 15% of area South of Kyoto Gardens Ave. -8.24 Ac. sf 1 1 • ` Irk 195 -Ramp A r eA _ u Development Proaram Parcels Parcel A- (Office) 913,000 SF Parcel B - 80,000 SF Total 993,000 SF FWyyTJ � l \ 1111 aalie.w�ai /��}111/11 I Apr' �l sulfa, a 1�ao1 / ,mn till , I Il l ll ll l w:B ll l I 111 / ll l I I a V s C d V r i AI a Gardens Mall DRI o N Zoning PCD Q m a / Land Use DRIIPCD ♦^^n 1.1. a a a Loc tion Map IKYOTO GAROENS DRIVE Q / NORTH 0 50' 100' 200' Scale: 1" =11 00'-0" r JGP of 1 .a/ roanyp - -1 firm,oarmrparahon vn o f Me wdvm permissi no,the tlnigner. p np�x °e. F 1a "15.11 Project No.: SBL39.005 / / Onianetl By: eY: NAM t;FUart Checked By. KT ch-k Suhm "mat W[ea: Comments 1125.11 NAM MEW REVIEW 1 / / 12D5.11 SCM Preappric ' Me-" .¢text 01.12.12 SCM Subm %PCA Amendment 05.07.12 SCM Resubmit MID Amendment 10 .12 SCM Revise phn 1221.12 SCM '2 plan 1 1 E ll 1 / I 13 03.12. SCM Resubm %PCOAmenamam FWyyTJ � l \ 1111 aalie.w�ai /��}111/11 I Apr' �l sulfa, a 1�ao1 / ,mn till , I Il l ll ll l w:B ll l I 111 / ll l I I a V s C d V r i AI a Gardens Mall DRI o N Zoning PCD Q m a / Land Use DRIIPCD ♦^^n 1.1. a a a Loc tion Map IKYOTO GAROENS DRIVE Q / NORTH 0 50' 100' 200' Scale: 1" =11 00'-0" r JGP of 1 It li ■ Lake Dec. 23, 2011 SHEET DESCRIPTION TYPE Al BUFFER'A1'- INTERSTATE 95 RAMP 25' BUFFER & SUA EASEMENT L -1 BUFFER KEY: LEGEND/ SHEET INDEX / PLAN Drawn By: SCM TYPE BUFFER'A2% INTERSTATE 95 RAMP 25'BUFFER PBGResubmittal SCM L -3 BUFFER'A2' - INTERSTATE 95 RAMP - PLAN / SECTION PBG Resubmittal SCM TYPE BUFFER'B' - INTERSTATE 95 25'BUFFER L -5 EXISTING BUFFER 'C' - PINE TREE BOULEVARD - PLAN I SECTION TYPE BUFFER'C'- NORTH PROPERTY LINE PRESERVE AREA L -6 BUFFER 'D' - ALT A1A & FEC RAILROAD - PLAN / SECTION TYPE BUFFER'D% EAST PROPERTY LINE 20' BUFFER & SUA EASEMENTS L -8 BUFFER'F' - RCA CENTER DRIVE - PLAN / SECTION TYPE BUFFER 'E'- KYOTO GARDENS DRIVE 15' BUFFER & SUA EASEMENTS L -10 BUFFER'H' - PARCEL A & PARCEL B - PLAN / SECTION TYPE F BUFFER'F'- RCA CENTER DRIVE LANDSCAPE AREA & SUA EASEMENTS L -11 EXISTING STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE PLAN - KYOTO GARDENS DRIVE WEST- PLAN TYPE G BUFFER'G'- PARCEL A & PARCEL B LANDSCAPE AREA & SUA EASEMENTS L -13 EXISTING STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE PLAN - RCA CENTER DRIVE - PLAN TYPE BUFFER 'H'- PARCEL A & PARCEL B LANDSCAPE AREA, UTILITY EASEMENTS & SUA EASEMENTS It li ■ Lake Winchester Courts Residential s �" PUBLIC BUS STOP ®, EASEMENT =11 ;'k.„; P.B. 111, PG.171 (SEE DETAIL) 2,451' rn 578 Parcel A Parcel B y KYOTO i If ft* �ARpENs DRIVEE ®® ®® Air �Jarr� a ®� `" m ra OP ti> e ®®® LIFT STATION )SEE DETAIL) /Q Q5 �I : L Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics The offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.0 ikstudios.com #LCC000035 Copyrghe All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and Me ptoperty of Me designer, and was created for Me exclusive use of Me specified project These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation without Me written permission of Me designer. L d E Iz O �L Q �rJ U V o U O �^ Y � Q P so 'L e O LL ^N s Y Y L a T M� Y W L E E " CL me Date: Dec. 23, 2011 SHEET DESCRIPTION 11 -042.005 Designed By: L -1 BUFFER KEY: LEGEND/ SHEET INDEX / PLAN Drawn By: SCM L -2 SUFFER'A1' - INTERSTATE 95 RAMP - PLAN I SECTION KT PBGResubmittal SCM L -3 BUFFER'A2' - INTERSTATE 95 RAMP - PLAN / SECTION PBG Resubmittal SCM L -4 BUFFER 'B' - INTERSTATE 95 - PLAN / SECTION L -5 EXISTING BUFFER 'C' - PINE TREE BOULEVARD - PLAN I SECTION L -6 BUFFER 'D' - ALT A1A & FEC RAILROAD - PLAN / SECTION L -7 BUFFER 'E' - KYOTO GARDENS DRIVE - PLAN / SECTION L -8 BUFFER'F' - RCA CENTER DRIVE - PLAN / SECTION L -9 BUFFER 'G' - PARCEL A & PARCEL B - PLAN / SECTION L -10 BUFFER'H' - PARCEL A & PARCEL B - PLAN / SECTION L -11 EXISTING STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE PLAN - KYOTO GARDENS DRIVE WEST- PLAN L -12 EXISTING STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE PLAN - KYOTO GARDENS DRIVE EAST - PLAN L -13 EXISTING STREETSCAPE LANDSCAPE PLAN - RCA CENTER DRIVE - PLAN L -14 EXISTING STREET CROSS - SECTIONS - KYOTO GARDENS AND RCA CENTER DRIVES Winchester Courts Residential s �" PUBLIC BUS STOP ®, EASEMENT =11 ;'k.„; P.B. 111, PG.171 (SEE DETAIL) 2,451' rn 578 Parcel A Parcel B y KYOTO i If ft* �ARpENs DRIVEE ®® ®® Air �Jarr� a ®� `" m ra OP ti> e ®®® LIFT STATION )SEE DETAIL) /Q Q5 �I : L Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics The offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.0 ikstudios.com #LCC000035 Copyrghe All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and Me ptoperty of Me designer, and was created for Me exclusive use of Me specified project These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation without Me written permission of Me designer. L d E Iz O �L Q �rJ U V o U O �^ Y � Q P so 'L e O LL ^N s Y Y L a T M� Y W L E E " CL me Date: Dec. 23, 2011 Project No.: 11 -042.005 Designed By: SCM Drawn By: SCM Checked By: KT Revision Dates: 12- 23 -11: Client Review SCM 01- 12 -12: Submit PCDAmendment SCM 06-07- 120woermview NAM ID4412 PBG Resubminal NAM 12 -21 -12 PBGResubmittal SCM 03-16 -13 PBG Resubmittal SCM PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOLS COMMONNAME BOTANICAL NAME HEIGHT SPREAD CANOPYTREES: At Planting At Planting 0 LIVE OAK Quemus virginiana 12' -18'HT 5'7' SOUTH FLORIDA Pinus elliottil'Dcu sa- Existing SLASH PINE SOUTH FLORIDA Pinus elHottll'Densa' 12' -16' Proposed 5' SLASH PINE UND EER�R1��{{STTOORY TREES: 0 EAST PALATKA HOLLY Ilex aHenuata'East Palatka' 12' HT 5' PROPOSED SOUTH .JJ GEIGERTREE Cordia sebestena 12' HT 5' FLORIDA SLASH PINE SABAL PALMS EMOTING SLASH PINE TO PALMS: 3e SHRUBS PARCEL A &B REMAIN (IF FEASIBLE AS DETERMINED BY PROJECT SHRUB: URGE MASS PLANTINGS GROUNOCOVER 1aoOcw.[<ce. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT] SUCH AS WAX MYRTLE. WILD COFFEE, MYRSINECOCOPLUM, SAW CANOPY TREES UNDERSTORY TREE PALMETTO A &FAKAHATCHEE SABALPALM Sabot palmetto 8'.14 -CT Hurricane Cut <¢ SHRUBS' d. ewoGu w WAX MYRTLE Myrica cedfem 7 23 ® COCOPLUM Chrysobalanus I"co V41'11T 2' -3' ..... MYRSINE Rapanea punctata 2'-T HT 2'4' •}',` •`a RI ® WILDCOFFEE Psycoteria nervosa 2'3'HT -2' BAMASOD O W> f DWARF SAW PALMETTO Sabal minor 23'HT .+�•' ®+. •''`cINPFdivbli'E`•` FAKAHATCHEE GRASS Tdpsacum dactyloldes 2'J'HT 1,5' -2' 1 -95 SOUTH BOUND ON RAMP TYPE BUFFER'A1' - SOUTH PERIMETER 750'LINEAR FEET Al GROUNDCOVERS _ PLAN VIEW SCALE: 1 "= 20' -0" COONTIE Zamia pumila (1'4' HT TYP.) DWARF YAUPON HOLLY Ilex vomitoda INDIAN HAWTHORN Raphlolepis lndiea DWARF FAK. GRASS Tdpsacum floridanum EXISTING SLASH PINE TO REMAIN ' (IF FEASIBLE AS DETERMINED BY PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) UNDERSTORYTREE NATIVE SHRUB INFILL LARGE MASS SABAL PALMS PLANTINGS SUCH AS Vd LD COFFEE,ay COCOPLUM, SAW PALMETTO B��� FAKAHATCHEE GRASS PL NATIVE GROUNDCOVER CANOPYTREES LOCATION MAP BAHIA SOD G' SHRUBS it /1-95 OUTH BOUND E 5' SERVICE ROAD OR ELEVATED ON -RAMP Y 25' DEVELOPABLEAREA PARCEL 'A' SUA U.E. LANDSCAPE WIDTH VARIES BUFFER Q r TYPE PERIMETER BUFFER "Al" - SOUTH PERIMETER LOOKING EST Mdd 25' -0" BUFFER CROSS SECTION SCALE: 1" = 10' -0" J j Q Q ~ PGA BLVD. t9 This c Sheet G kildar STUDIOS Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics The Offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366,1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudios.com #LCC000035 Copyright All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and Me property of the designer, and wee crerted for the exclusive use of the spetified project. These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation without Me written Permission of Me designer. i! ^O W �L■ Q }■ U O EL ■ ® v Q A� ® Q M p so i O Mason LL g N s e so r ; L Q e 0 O z 0 saw a � � s m N g MFG I= 2 P a m; 1 '1111111 a' Date: Dec. 23, 2011 Project No.: 1"42.005 Designed By: SCM Drawn By: SCM Checked By: KT Revision Dates: 12- 23 -11: Client Review SCM 01- 12 -12: Submit RED Amendment SCM 05-07 -12 PCD City Comment Resaone NAM 90 -20.12 PBG Resubmittal NAM 1281-12 PBG Resubmittal SCM PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOLS COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME HEIGHT SPREAD CANOPY TREES: At Planting At Planting LIVE OAK Quercus virginlana 12' -iS'HT 5'7' _ SOUTH FLORIDA FIRMS elliottil'Densa' Existing SLASH PINE SOUTH FLORIDA Pinus efilottil'Densa' 12'.16'Proposed 5' SLASH PINE UNDERSTORY TREES: snaaL Palms PARCEL 3a'SHRUBS- onLLo .e. • =e• PROPOSED W UGH EAST PALATKA HOLLY Ilex attenuata'East Palatka' 12' HT 5' GROVNDCOVER FLORIDA SLASH PINE EXISTING SLASH PINE TO REMAIN CANOPYTREES (IF FEASIBLE AS DETERMINED BY GEIGER TREE Candle sebestena 12' HT 5 PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) ie SHRUB: LARGE MASS PLANTINGS SUCH AS PALMS' Ij WAx MYRTLE. WILD COFFEE, MYRSINE, COCOPLUM, SAWPALMEriOBFAI0,4ATCHEE IN Iv GRASS . mu SABALPALM Sabot palmetto e' -14'CT Hurricane Cut ry GLL. T VNOERSTORV iftEE 2 WE . . "... SHRUBS: ✓— W�PROPERTY LINE ISO WAX MYRTLE Mydca centers 3" 2' -3' 1 -95 SOUTH BOUND ON RAMP ® MYRSIN UM Repaired p n ctat aco 2'-0' HT 2'3' MYRSINE Rapanea punctata 2' 41'HT 2'41' ® WILD COFFEE Psycoteda nervosa 2'4* FIT TYPE PERIMETER BUFFER'A2` -SOUTH PERIMETER 1,304' LINEAR FEET DWARF SAW PALMETTO Sabal minor 2-THT 5'2' PLAN VIEW SCALE: 1" = 20' -0" FAKAHATCHEE GRASS Tdpsacum dactyloides 23' HT 1.5'2' GROUNDCOVERS' COONTIE Zamia pumlla (1'3' HT TYP.) DWARF YAUPON HOLLY flex vomiloda INDIAN HAWTHORN Raphiolepts indica DWARF FAK. GRASS Tdpsacum Boridanum EXISTING SLASH PINE TO REMAIN (IF FEASIBLE AS DETERMINED BY PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCH.) UNDERSTORYTREE SHRUB LARGE MASS SABAL PALMS PLANTINGS SUCH AS WILD COFFEE, COCOPLUM SAW PALMETTO & FAKAHATCHEE lzr GROUNDCOVIER GRASS A ' I CANOPY TREES LOCATION MAP V BAHIA SOD Q.. �''� *j'� 6" SHRUBS P i, 1 -95 SOUTH BOUND ELEVATED ISLAND 25' LANDSCAPE DEVELOPABLE PARCEL A BUFFER OR DEVELOPABLE AREA TYPE PERIMETER BUFFER `A2® - SOUTH PERIMETER LOOKING WEST 25'-0" BUFFER Q SECTION SCALE: 1" = 10' -0" Q f J Q Q � ~ PGA BLVD. This c�c Sheet G kilda r STUDIOS Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics The Offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366,1111 www.udkstudios.com #LCCOD0035 Copyright All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by This drawing are owned by tl Me property or Me designer, and vIere created for Me exclusive use or Me spedfied project These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation without Me written Permission of Me designer. W Q O W L > T e� U V 0 sea Cu O Q V r n\ a O Q I LL 5 �L 6 m s" N i - d N L Q 0 O w' gym` a 0 V E M m L m A /� L Y� E Dee CO Date: Dec. 23, 2011 Project No.: 11 -042.005 Designed By: SCM Drawn By: SCM Checked By: KT Revision Dates: 12.23 -11: client Review SCM 01- 1242: Submit no Amendment SCM 0507-12 Ovmer Review NAM 10 -20.12 PSG Resubmittal NAM 12 -2112 PBG Resubmmal SCM TYPE (I SABAL PALMS 36" SHRUBS PARCEL A OR B GROUND TREES E I CANOPY PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOLS COMMONNAME BOTANICAL NAME HEIGHT SPREAD CANOPYTREES. At Planting At Planting LIVE OAK Ouerws virginiana 12' -15'HT 5. -7. PROPOSED SOUTH FLORIDA SLASH PINE EXISTING SLASH PINE TO REMAIN SOUTH FLORIDA Pmus eilktui'Deosw Existing (IF FEASIBLE AS DETERMINED BY SLASH PINE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) SHRUB: LARGE MASS PLANTINGS SUCH AS WAX SOUTH FLORIDA Pinus eilioM m i'Dsa' 12'-16' Proposed MYRTLE, WILD COFFEE, b' SLASH PINE MYRSINE, COCOPLUM, SAW PALMETTO & FAKAHATCHEE GRASS, UNDERSTORY TREES: BUFFER' EXISTING SLASH PINE TO REMAIN (IF FEASIBLE AS DETERMINED BY PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) UNDERSTORY TREE NATIVE SHRUB INFILL: LARGE MASS PLANTINGS SUCH AS WILD COFFEE, COCOPLUM, SAW PALMETTO & FAKAHATCHEE GRASS NATIVE GROUNOCOVER I -95 2s' LANDSCAF 5' BUFFER SECTION EAST PALATKA HOLLY Ilex attenuata'East Palatka' 12' HT 5• GEIGERTREE Gordis sebestena 17 HT 5• to W - -- — —_ .. 14 SHRUBS: -1 m OOW WAX MYRTLE Mynca centers 31 Za• p Ch ,W A 60D �. �... :... ' -� .. .. :' . MYRSINE COPLUM purposes punctata icaco 2J• HT 2.3• ... WILD COFFEE Psycotena nervosa osa ERTYLINE ® ® -95 DWARF SAW PALMETTO Saba l minor 23 -HT 1S' -Y FAKAHATCHEE GRASS Tripsacum dadyloides 2-4- HT 1.5' -2' TREES 097 .M PARCEL A OR B SCALE: 1" = 10' -0" COONTIE Zamia Fronds (V41 -HT TYP.) DWARF YAUPON HOLLY Ilex vUmitaria BE INDIAN HAWTHORN Raphiolepis Ind" DWARF FAK. GRASS Tripsacum lloridanum v kilda STUDIOS Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics The Offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudics.com #LCC000035 Copyright: All ideas, designs, arrangement, and plans represented by this thwarts are owned by and the property of Me designer, and were created for the exclusive use of the spedfied projeR These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall not be used by, or disclosed! W any person, firm, or corporation without Me written permission of Me designer. rr W E CL AO H[ W\ �a T a^ U INS V Q i Q Q L s O um a i s .Na.� ID T L m $ M 0 _ O t 4 y,=1, aav�r /V� L ,V Cl)yye m L a m° Date: Dec. 23, 2011 Project No.: 11-042.005 Designed By: SCM Drawn By: SCM Checked By: KT Revision Dates: 12- 23 -11: Client Review SCM 01- 12 -12: Submit no Amendment SCM 05-07 -12 Owner Review NAM 1044 -12 PBG Resubmittal NAM 12 -21 -12 PBO Resubmittal SCM SABALPALM S Sabal palmetto S S -AWCT H Hurm:ane Cut W TREES 097 .M PARCEL A OR B SCALE: 1" = 10' -0" COONTIE Zamia Fronds (V41 -HT TYP.) DWARF YAUPON HOLLY Ilex vUmitaria BE INDIAN HAWTHORN Raphiolepis Ind" DWARF FAK. GRASS Tripsacum lloridanum v kilda STUDIOS Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics The Offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudics.com #LCC000035 Copyright: All ideas, designs, arrangement, and plans represented by this thwarts are owned by and the property of Me designer, and were created for the exclusive use of the spedfied projeR These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall not be used by, or disclosed! W any person, firm, or corporation without Me written permission of Me designer. rr W E CL AO H[ W\ �a T a^ U INS V Q i Q Q L s O um a i s .Na.� ID T L m $ M 0 _ O t 4 y,=1, aav�r /V� L ,V Cl)yye m L a m° Date: Dec. 23, 2011 Project No.: 11-042.005 Designed By: SCM Drawn By: SCM Checked By: KT Revision Dates: 12- 23 -11: Client Review SCM 01- 12 -12: Submit no Amendment SCM 05-07 -12 Owner Review NAM 1044 -12 PBG Resubmittal NAM 12 -21 -12 PBO Resubmittal SCM 0 w 30 Oo Wm ow of WRIGHT OF WAY FOR PINE TREE BOULEVARD PROPERTY LINE SECTION CUT J W ~ w aQ2 Qw <3M ow NORTHERN PALM BEACH COUNTY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT CANAL C) W w w_ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — TYPE e L 3 } l 4� \� h � EXISTING UPLAND �o- PRESERVE AREA — EXISTING SOUTH FLORIDA SLASH PINE TREES 1- & NATIVE UNDERSTORY R'C' - PINE TREE t, s, TYPE EASEMENTc I I = 20• -0° ACRE PRESERVE EXISTING TO REMAIN The Offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudios.com #LCC000035 Copyright All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and the property of the designer, and were created for the exclusive use of the specified project. These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation without the mitten permission of the designer. Does O as L all .N V E V O U ® 'a Q � a � Q IM eo Lee LL to m � U L M = O o a WORK M m mCJ) L E xxxxod a m Date: Dec. 23, 2011 Project No.: 11-042.005 Designed By: SCM Drawn By: SCM Checked By: KT Revision Dates: 12- 23 -11: Client Review SCM 0142-12: Submit PCD Amendment SCM 05-0142 Ovmer Revvew NAM 10 -24 -12 PBGResubmittal NAM 128142 PBG Resubmittal SCM 03 -1513 PBG Resubmittal SCM 0 TKUM NI 1— - = a m i; n /-NO LANDSCAPE UNDERSTORY TREE CANOPY TREES BUFFERADJACENT TO THE PRESERVE EXISTING SLASH PINE TO REMAIN GROUNDCOVER (IF FEASIBLEAS DETERMINED BY 36" SHRUBS PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) PARCEL A / C SABAL PALMS SHRUB: LARGE MASS PLANTINGS SUCH AS WAX MYRTLE, VdLD COFFEE, MYRSINE, COCOPLUM, SAW PALMETTO &FAKAHATCHEE GRASS. PROPOSED SOUTH FLORIDA SLASH PINE TYPE BUFFF PLAN VIEW I EXISTING SLASH PINE TO REMAIN LANDSCAPE - DETERMINED BY I 5 PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) I � .,,. UNDERSTORY TREE SABAL PALMS NATIVE SHRUB INFILL: LARGE MASS Af PLANTINGS SUCH AS WILD COFFEE, COCOPLUM, SAW PALMETTO & yyS FAKAHATCHEE GRASS CANOPYTREESl" '- s NATIVE GROUNDCOVER 36" SHRUBS BAHIA SOD R I I 15 10' I 10' PARCEL A / C I 20 SUA EASEMENT EASEMENT EASEMENT +Ir _ LANDSCAPES BUFFER NO LANDSCAOE 14 BUFFER ADJACENT TO i THE PRESERVE S' OVERLAP 7 jjjrjTWff�"AWrmAjff Well 685 LINEAR SCALE: I" n= RAILROAD TRACKS 100' -0 FEC RAILROAD 20' -0" BUFFER SCALE: 1" = 10' -0" SYMBOLS COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME HEIGHT SPREAD CANOPY TREES: At Planting At Planting 0 LIVE OAK Ouerous virginiana 12'- Ifn HT 5.-T. 0A SOUTH FLORIDA Plnus elllottii'Densa' Existing SLASH PINE SOUTH FLORIDA Pinus elllottil'Densa' 12' -16' Proposed 5' SLASH PINE EAST PALATKA HOLLY ilex attenuata'East Palatka' 12' HT 5' GEIGER TREE Cord[a sebestena 12' HT 5' SABAL PALM Sabal palmetto e' -14' CT Hurricane Cut 0000 WAX MYRTLE Mydca cedfera 3- Ta- COCOPLUM Chrysobalanus iwco 2' -3' HT 2 %T 21-3' ® MYRSINE Raptures puncbr a 2' -3' HT ® WILDCOFFEE Psyaoterla nervosa 2'41'HT 1.5'2' DWARF SAW PALMETTO Saba[ minor 2J14T goFAKAHATCHEE GRASS Tripsrcum dactyloldes 2'J'HT COONTIE Zama pumila DWARF YAUPON HOLLY Ilex vomltoda ME INDIAN HAWTHORN Raphlotepis lndica DWARF FAK. GRASS Tdpsacum floridanum 1 -95 SOUTHBOUND ELEVATED ON -RAMP FROM ALT Al (V 'HTTYPJ The Offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstud[os.com #LCC000035 Copyright: All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and Me property of Me designer, and were created for Me exclusive use of Me specified Project. These ideas, designs, amendments or plans shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, fins, or corporation without Me written permission of Me designer. new W E CL O A® W LM ` 0 V E V O V 00 ^V a 1..1.. Q .M LM V O LL N G d 0 O 9 Own t�6 � d m = t4 CL m Date: Dec. 23, 2011 Project No.: 11 -042.005 Designed By: SCM Drawn By: SCM Checked By: KT Revision Dates: 1283 -11: Client Review SCM 01- 12 -12: Submit PCCAmendment SCM 06-07 -12 Owner Review NAM 10 -2412 PSG Resubmidal NAM 12 -21 -12 PBo Resubmittal SCM 03-1 &13 PBGResubmiltal SCM § 11 KYOTO GARDENS DRIVE 3: SOD Q f J /f F W r =W O to - Oul Our IHII TOim `—UNDERSTORYTREE EXISTING SLASH PINE TO REMAIN (IF FEASIBLE AS DETERMINED BY PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) SHRUB: LARGE MASS PLANTINGS SUCH AS WAX MYRTLE, WLD COFFEE, MYRSINE, COCOPLUM, SAW PALMETTO B FAKAHATCHEE GRASS. PROPOSED SOUTH FLORIDA SLASH PINE TYPE E EXISTING SLASH PINE TO REMAIN (IF FEASIBLE AS DETERMINED BY PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) SABALPALMS CANOPY TREES 36 "SHRUBS PARCEL A SYMBOLS COMMONNAME BOTANICAL NAME HEIGHT SPREAD CANOPYTREES: At Planting At Planting 0 LNEOAK Ouemus vlrglilana 12' -18'HT 5. -7. SOUTH FLORIDA Pinus elHottil'Densa' Existing ;Jl',il' SLASH PINE CURB SOUTH FLORIDA Pinus ellloHll'Densa' 12'-16' Proposed 5- SLASH PINE 5' SIDEWALK EXISTING ya...' RIGHTOFWAYLINE Myna centers 3' �y t S COCOPLUM Chrysobalanus Icaco 243' HT ST. AUGUSTINETLORITAM' SOD ✓`i y; �r� "�y Rapanea punctata 2'3' HT 213' ® —_ -- _ - -_ -- 2'3'HT 1.5' -2' ERIE'. t 0' a�- SUA EASEMENT 15' BUFF 5 L OVERLAP PARCEL A NATIVE SHRUB INFILL: LARGE MASS PLANTINGS SUCH AS WILD COFFEE, COCOPLUM, SAW PALMETTO 6 FAKAHATCHEE GRASS NATIVE GROUNDCOVER 1:liIG1 CANOPYTREES GROUNDCOVER 36"SHRUBS SABALPALMS RIVE SCALE: 1" = 10' -0" KYOTO GARDENS DRIVE l i EXISTING PLANTINGS 15' -0" BUFFER SCALE: 1 "= 10' -0" EAST PALATKA HOLLY Ilex attenuata'East Palatka' 12' HT 5' GEIGERTREE Cordia sebestena 12'HT 5' SABALPALM Sabal palmetto 8'-14'CT Hurricane Cut (1'3' HT TYP.) The Offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudios.com #LCC000035 Copyright All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and the Property of the designer, and were created for Me exclusive use of the specified pm)mt These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or omporafion without the written permission of the designer. �E/a� idle O LM �\ i / .o on , V E V_ O ■ P ' v �Q (a AV EL i Q S L s O LL. 5 e Lev LU $ C a V V i � � d m m sI: y4ee _ W T d Date: Project No.: Designed By: Drawn By: Checked By: WAX MYRTLE Myna centers 3' 2'41' DWARF YAUPON HOLLY Ilex vomitoda COCOPLUM Chrysobalanus Icaco 243' HT 2'3' ® MYRSINE Rapanea punctata 2'3' HT 213' ® WILD COFFEE Psycoteria nervosa 2'3'HT 1.5' -2' DWARF SAW PALMETTO Saba) minor 23'HT 1.5' -2' FAKAHATCHEE GRASS Tripsacum dactyloides 2'3' HT 1.5' -2' (1'3' HT TYP.) The Offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudios.com #LCC000035 Copyright All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and the Property of the designer, and were created for Me exclusive use of the specified pm)mt These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or omporafion without the written permission of the designer. �E/a� idle O LM �\ i / .o on , V E V_ O ■ P ' v �Q (a AV EL i Q S L s O LL. 5 e Lev LU $ C a V V i � � d m m sI: y4ee _ W T d Date: Project No.: Designed By: Drawn By: Checked By: Dec. 23, 2011 11 -042.005 SCM SCM KT COONTIE Zamia Pumila 12.23.11: Client Review DWARF YAUPON HOLLY Ilex vomitoda Im 05-07 -12 Owner Review INDIAN HAWTHORN Raphlolepls lndlca 104412 PSG Resubmival NAM 12 -2142 PBG Resubmitial SCM DWARF FAK. GRASS Tnpsacum floridanum (1'3' HT TYP.) The Offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudios.com #LCC000035 Copyright All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and the Property of the designer, and were created for Me exclusive use of the specified pm)mt These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or omporafion without the written permission of the designer. �E/a� idle O LM �\ i / .o on , V E V_ O ■ P ' v �Q (a AV EL i Q S L s O LL. 5 e Lev LU $ C a V V i � � d m m sI: y4ee _ W T d Date: Project No.: Designed By: Drawn By: Checked By: Dec. 23, 2011 11 -042.005 SCM SCM KT Revision Dates: 12.23.11: Client Review SCM 0142 -12: Submit PCO Amendment SCM 05-07 -12 Owner Review NAM 104412 PSG Resubmival NAM 12 -2142 PBG Resubmitial SCM MEDIAN / - ,'— SOD EXISTING FOXTAIL PALMS-- RCA CENTER DRIVE 3 SOD O 5' SIDEWALK 0 m L SOD ®® ®RIGHTOF WAYLINE 1- om o < m w _ SOD CANOPY TREES W W Q. O _ sta 3k ow ]to a° yi ° + + p N Z m U. ++ ? "fl111n i l �'y2m EXISTING SLASH PINE TO REMAIN (IF FEASIBLE AS DETERMINED BY PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECI PROPOSED SOUTH FLORIDA SLASH PINE I RIGHT PLAN VIEW EXISTING SLASH PINE TO REMAIN (IF FEASIBLE AS DETERMINED BY PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) SABAL PALMS —` EXISTING UNDERSTORY TO REMAIN TYPE PARCEL A - FER'E' - RCA TREES PARCEL A EASEMENT J s LANDSCAPE PL BUFFER 5'OVERLAP so Jill 11 1111 ST. AUGUSTINE SOD MEANDERING SIDEWALK 1 k PALMS & � REMAIN SCALE: 1" = 1 D' -0" RCA CENTER DRIVE TREES MEANDERING afflMum EASEMENT PA IRCEL A R LANDSCAPE —�P BUFFER 5'OVERLAP 1 " =10 1-01, Ills A SYMBOLS COMMONNAME BOTANICAL NAME HEIGHT SPREAD CANOPY TREES: At Planting At Planting 0 LIVE OAK Ouercus virginiana 12'- 1 8t HT 5'-7' �p SOUTH FLORIDA Pints elllottil'Densa' Existing * t SLASH PINE SOUTH FLORIDA Pinus elliottll'Densa' 12-46. Proposed 5' SLASH PINE IDI�ERRy�{1S�TTORY TREES: y� EAST PALATKA HOLLY Ilex attenuata'East Palatka' 12' HT 5' GEIGER TREE Cordia sebestena 12' HT 5' SABALPALM Sabal palmetto 8' -04'CT Hurricane Cut CCOO WAX MYRTLE Mydca centers 3' 2'3' COCOPLUM Chrysobalanus Icaco 2'3' HT 2 - -3' 2'3' ® MYRSINE Raptures punctata 2'3' HT ® WILD COFFEE Psycoteda nervosa 2'3' HT DWARF SAW PALMETTO Ballast minor 23'HT FAKAHATCHEE GRASS Tdpsacum dactyloides 2'3' HT 1.5' -2' DUNDCOVERS COONTIE Zamla pundits (1'3' HT TYP.) DWARF YAUPON HOLLY Ilex vomiloda Im INDIAN HAWTHORN Raphlolepis lbdica DWARF FAK. GRASS Tripsacumfloddanum ki I ddy Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics The Offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave-, Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudios.com #LCC000035 Copyright All ideas, designs, arrangement, and plans represented by this drawing are awned by and Me property of Me designer, and were rested for Me exclusive use or the specified project These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation without Me written permission of Me designer. Also W E a O t11aa® d L 9 CD •L V V � U O D a Q «s EL V aL "s O LL "s s" N x C s � s LL 0 a V V a t6 � m � L A �a E e CL mo III M Date: Dec. 23, 2011 Project No.: 11 -042.005 Designed By: SCM Drawn By: SCM Checked By: KT Revision Dates: 12- 23 -11: Client Review SCM 0142 -12: Submit PCD Amendment SCM 05-07 -12 Owner Review NAM 10 -2412 PBC Resubminal NAM 12 -21 -12 080 Resubmittal SCM 03.16 -13 P60Resubmittu SCM PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOLS COMMONNAME BOTANICAL NAME HEIGHT SPREAD CANOPY TREES' Al Planting At Planting 0 LIVEOAK Quemus virginlana 12'. 1S'HT 5' -7' SOUTH FLORIDA Pinus elliottil - Densa' Existing SLASH PINE SOUTH FLORIDA Pines elllottll'Densa' 12' -16' Proposed S. SLASH PINE UNDERSTORY TREES: PARCEL B EAST PALATKA HOLLY Ilex attenuate 'East Palatka' 72' HT 5' GEIGER TREE Cotdla sebestena 12' HT 5' 500 SOD c ++ ++ PALMS: q + PROPERTY LINE + Sabel palmetto e' -14'CT Hurricane Cut + ++ SABAL PALM °. + + O3 SODS — _ — — — — — 't SHRUBS OCOO WAX MYRTLE Myriwcenters 3' T� PARCEL A COCOPLUM Chryso s 2'J' HT 2'a' PROPOSED SHRUBS CANOPY TREES ® MYRSINE Rapanea pun punctato ta 2'41' HT 2•41' ® WILDCOFFEE Psycoteria nervosa 2' -3 -HT EXISTING SLASH PINE TO REMAIN DWARF SAW PALMETTO Sabel minor 2J'HT TYPE PARCEL A & B BUFFER V - 16' SHARED BUFFER 1,073 LINEAR FEET PLAN VIEW SCALE:1 10' -01• FAKAHATCHEEGRASS Tdpsacum daclytoldes 2'3'HT GROUNDCOVERS' COONTIE 2:arn a pumila (1'41' HT TYP.) DWARF YAUPON HOLLY Ilex vomitorla INDIAN HAWTHORN Raphlolepis Indies DWARF FAK. GRASS Tdpsacum 6orldanum EXISTING SLASH PINE TO REMAIN LOCATION MAP (IF FEASIBLE AS DETERMINED BY PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT) " This IT CANOPY TREES - STAGGERED Sheet BAHIA SOD PROPOSED SHRUBS Q Q PARCEL A PARCEL B e• -o- P e• -o' J LANDSCAPE L —LANDSCAPE Q BUFFER BUFFER F- >- PGA BLVD. of i Q ON TYPE PARCEL A F R'G' - 1 ' SHARED BUFFER - LOOKING EST J SECTION SCALE: 1 " = 1 0' -0" The Offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1101 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudios.com $LCC000035 Copyright: All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and Me property of she designer, and were created for Me exclusive use of Me specified project. These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall not be used by, or disclosed be any person, firm, or corporation manhunt the written permission of Me designer. IMI L E om 0 A® t W` T e� U V 0 U Q � 0 a � Q V L O LL g 6 s m 0 C ; Oa t V (j ear• F E 4� E a ca Date: Dec. 23, 2011 Project No.: 11 -042.005 Designed By: SCM Drawn By: SCM Checked By: KT Revision Dates: 12- 23 -11: Client Review SCM 0142 -02: Submit POC Amendment SCM 05-07 -12 Owner Review NAM 10 -2112 PBC Resubmitlal NAM 12 -21 -12 PSG Resubmittal SCM 03 -15 -13 PSG Resubmitted SCM PARCEL A TYPE PP 0F LAN PROPOSED SHRUBS I 0 CANOPY TREES SCALE: 1" = 10' -0" SYMBOLS COMMONNAME BOTANICAL NAME HEIGHT SPREAD CANOPY TREES' At Planting At Planting 0 LNEOAK Ouercus vlrginlana 12' -18'HT V -7. 1 31 SOUTH FLORIDA Pious elllottli'Densa' Existing SLASH PINE SOUTHFLORIDA Pinus ellionli'Densa' 12'46'Proposed 5' SLASH PINE EAST PALATKA HOLLY Ilex attenuata'Easl Palatka' 12' HT 5' GEIGERTREE Cordia sebestena 12'HT 5' SABAL PALM Sabal palmetto 8'44'CT Hurricane Cut WAX MYRTLE Myrica cerlfera 3' w }} f COCOPLUM }+ am w w 2'4' 2' -3' ® MYRSINE Z LL Z ® J m Psycoteria nervosa a } N_ DWARF SAW PALMETTO Sabal minor SOD — — — _ — — — ----------- --- > 1 -5' -2' GROUNDCOVERS: 1–Z Z J w j w SOD Zamia pumila IT -Z' HT TYP.I N DWARF YAUPON HOLLY Ilex vomitoda � INDIAN HAWTHORN Raphiolepis Indlca w _ — — _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Tdpsacum floddanum N F am 30' ACCESS EASEMENT O w m — SOD _ _ _ — _ — _ SOD _ w }f }} UK } N W Q LL z� Jm }} } f} f !n� Yr--- i SOD TYPE PP 0F LAN PROPOSED SHRUBS I 0 CANOPY TREES SCALE: 1" = 10' -0" SYMBOLS COMMONNAME BOTANICAL NAME HEIGHT SPREAD CANOPY TREES' At Planting At Planting 0 LNEOAK Ouercus vlrginlana 12' -18'HT V -7. 1 31 SOUTH FLORIDA Pious elllottli'Densa' Existing SLASH PINE SOUTHFLORIDA Pinus ellionli'Densa' 12'46'Proposed 5' SLASH PINE EAST PALATKA HOLLY Ilex attenuata'Easl Palatka' 12' HT 5' GEIGERTREE Cordia sebestena 12'HT 5' SABAL PALM Sabal palmetto 8'44'CT Hurricane Cut CANOPYTREES- STAGGERED — CANOPY TREES- STAGGERED -} PROPOSED SHRUBS ST. AUGUSTINE SOD I ST. AUGUSTINE SOD PROPOSED SHRUBS � — PARCEL A OR B I 30' ACCESS I I I PARCEL A EASEMENT LANDSCAPE SEACOAST UTILITY LANDSCAPE BUFFER UTILITIES EASEMENT BUFFER EASEMENT 30' ACCESS EASEMENT s; SCALE: 1" — ki I ddy STUDIOS Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics The Offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366 -1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudlos.com $LCC000035 Copyright: All ideas, designs, anangements, and plans represented by this drawing are awned by and Me property of the designer. and vere Bated for Me exclusive use or Me specified project These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation wiNout the written permission of Me designer. L® E Caz O W` L / 0 O U o � Q � Q 0 Imam L s wY� 5 W 6 L � g s oA \wo, W L MW E W L % M� € a co o Date: Project No.: Designed By: Drawn By: Checked By: WAX MYRTLE Myrica cerlfera 3' 2'2' SCM COCOPLUM Chrysobalanus loaco 2'43'11T 2'41'14T 2'4' 2' -3' ® MYRSINE Rapanea puncta[a ® WILD COFFEE Psycoteria nervosa 2'J'HT 1 -5' -2' DWARF SAW PALMETTO Sabal minor 24'HT 1.5'2' FAKAHATCHEEGRASS Tdpsacum clactyloides 2' -3'HT 1 -5' -2' GROUNDCOVERS: COONTIE Zamia pumila IT -Z' HT TYP.I DWARF YAUPON HOLLY Ilex vomitoda INDIAN HAWTHORN Raphiolepis Indlca DWARF FAK. GRASS Tdpsacum floddanum CANOPYTREES- STAGGERED — CANOPY TREES- STAGGERED -} PROPOSED SHRUBS ST. AUGUSTINE SOD I ST. AUGUSTINE SOD PROPOSED SHRUBS � — PARCEL A OR B I 30' ACCESS I I I PARCEL A EASEMENT LANDSCAPE SEACOAST UTILITY LANDSCAPE BUFFER UTILITIES EASEMENT BUFFER EASEMENT 30' ACCESS EASEMENT s; SCALE: 1" — ki I ddy STUDIOS Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics The Offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366 -1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstudlos.com $LCC000035 Copyright: All ideas, designs, anangements, and plans represented by this drawing are awned by and Me property of the designer. and vere Bated for Me exclusive use or Me specified project These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans shall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation wiNout the written permission of Me designer. L® E Caz O W` L / 0 O U o � Q � Q 0 Imam L s wY� 5 W 6 L � g s oA \wo, W L MW E W L % M� € a co o Date: Project No.: Designed By: Drawn By: Checked By: Dec. 23, 2011 11 -042.005 SCM SCM KT Revision Dates: 12- 23 -11: Client Review SCM 01- 12-12: Submit MD Amendment SCM 0509 -12 Owner Reviaw NAM 10 -2412 PBG Resubmittal NAM 12 -21.12 PBG Resubmittal SCM ICU L L Live Oak Quercus vifginiana Property Line i b�2o. X Im RAM Dec. 23, 2011 Project No.: 11 -042.005 Designed By: Sabid Palms Drawn By: SCM Littoral Sabal . Sod it S PIZ Me 'p Alexander Palm �- � o m`�° ro• n -m i 400'setback C i n o from Winchester in Courts residential -- fyp / Landy aP e r7_ Buffer T / NOTE: Streetscape Planting is / Littoral i Plantings / / Existing and Shown For Informational Sod / 20' Lake Access & Purposes Only Drainage / Sabal Palms / Dminag¢ / Sahel nalmelto 5' Sidewalk Sod m u! �fi n m =mm � a i 1 rl 1 esE60 ob e � d Tool eban Oslo be 1� U ^gonad SW Lift Station Sod Ground Cover -- ` d N N O P 'G m =y \ \ Ea \L Sod 1 Nv CZ m o� in m I /�� 15' 7YP �// Landscape �// _ Butter 2 r, r , Preserve c rJ Sod Saba] Palms -- Cowplum- Sabal palmetto Chrysobatanus icaco o t' V! N �< P m m m 5' Sidewalk Sod per m e, UPN 0 O y m ^ % re Existing Landsca Live Oak Quercus virginiana Crepe Myrtle 4;A* Lagerstmemia ini ica T4N. Y Bismark Palm a Bismarckia nobilis 4nAtrk* Sabal Palms Sabal palmetto Alexander Palm Plychospemta elegans gohao Shrubs Groundmver Location Map THIS - SHEET kilda STUDIOS Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics The Offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561366.1111 wuw.udkstudios.com #LCC000035 C Pyngrd: All mean, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawitg are owned by and fire property of the designer, and were created for the exclusive use of the specified project. These ideas, designs, a" Nemens, or plats shall net be used by, or disclosed to any person firm, or wmorxfion without the wriLLen permission of the designer. Date: Dec. 23, 2011 Project No.: 11 -042.005 Designed By: SCM Drawn By: SCM Checked By: KT Revision Dates: M M 0 a 1B' uE l5'Lan 'Atha 5 OyeAaP \ \\ kadday urbanlor&l desig \ STUDIOS \ \ \ Urban Planning & Design \ \\ Landscape Architecture \ \ l Communication Graphics \\ \ \ The Offices at City Place ).� 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 \ \ West Palm Beach, FL 33401 \ 561.366.1100 FAX 561.366.1111 www.udkstucios.com #LCCD00035 CopyngfR \ 1 All ideas designs, arrangements and plans \ represented by M¢ dmvang are owned by and \ Me property of the designer, and were created forms exclusive use of no specified project. These ideas, designs, arrangements or pars \ \ shall net be used by, or disclosed b any person, \ firm, or corporation wkineuf Me written permission of the designer. i, i _.._ Q. z z \ \ O a CL \ 50' � . REEMER Samoa LL E N N a a� / \ 0 V 7-0' 1YPe G i i \ \ ■ i 0 tC � 8 Landscape 4111111111 s L s CD 1 "a \ \\ \\ Q m C : i ell .s N E ' cC K \ \ Q a W a NORTH Date: Dee, 23, 2011 .. .. .. .. .. .. l . Project No.: 11- 042.005 Designed By: SCM Drawn By: SCM Checked By: KT Landscape Legend Location Map Revision Dates: THIS 12 -2111: client Review ScM Live Oak Q 0142 -12: SteurknDAmerMment SCM Cuercus virginiana SHEET F 0507-12: Gwner Review scm Q 10.2412 PBG Rewbmitbl NAM Crepe Myrde 12 -21 -12 PBG ResubmdFal SCM tagerstroemia indiw -N x Bismark Palm 3 Bismarckia nobilis � Saba[ Palms Saba[ palmetto } IY H Alexander Palm � Ptychospenna elegans oS io b� i]rTR Shrubs O '' ' Groundcover \�^Train Tracks WI l / Landscape Buffer JJ p °m o � ♦ � � � e � �. L_LJ ii ♦ ♦ T9 ° ♦ ♦ ♦ �� J 11 :� r c m \ \ ♦ \ \ \ ti .\ �� JJ y m JJJ JJ Foartaid Palms JJ 20' TypD J-1 Landscape Wodyet a bifurcate J J �- Buffer JJJ X JJJ -1 J-1 Sod JJ 5' Sidewalk - J-1 JJ iJJ KJJJJ JJJJ f JJ 6 �3m Aso 7 0 ^ae Parcel A JJJJ /��� JJJ 25'Type'A2' Lan -- JJJ dscape JBuffer - -5' Sidewalk JJJ,d NOTE: Streetscape Planting is J;J Existing and Shown For Informational / JJJ-J- Sod Purposes Only JJ /JJJJ JJ ♦ / JJJ ♦ Ir. 12' SUA Easement JJJ\ to be abandoned. --� Kill — -. �.� Sod JJJJ_. (� JJJJJ ` ♦♦ JJ IJJ ; to+3 ® _ JJJJJ o i m _JJJ JJJJJJJJ' N ✓ / JJJJJJJJ r. � � � JJJJJJJJ d JJJJJJJJ:. ._.!..1.1_1...1 ... 1...1.. y. ♦\ N JJJJJJJJ , J J_.1 _.I- .L..L..1_J JJ J. J / ... JJ _JJJJ_IJ J ff JiJJ Existing Landsca o o- JJJJJJJJ ' j i4 dl JJJ. � rob Live Oak 7 � Ouemus virginiana p i Crepe Myrtle Lagerstroemia Indira A" 9s Bannark Palm 3 Bismamkia nobilis Sabel Palms Sabel palmetto Alexander Palm Ptychospenna elegant; 1 00 Shrubs Yl ////f. Groundrnver Location KYOTO GARDENS DR. Q ki I (Jay STUDIOS Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics The Offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.3661100 FAX 561.3661111 www.udkstudios.com #LCC000035 copyright: All ideas, designs, arrangementS, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by add Me property of the designer, and were created for the exch¢ive use of the specified prated. Thra ideas, designs, ar2ngemen[s or plans shall net be dead by, or disclosed to any person, bad, or wrporaEon without Me wnden permission of the designer. .NI W 0L ^O W` L / U E V 0 U QY � � a Q p � x �g O N LL N � tC L ` 0 S M a co i �o SWININ E N e 'x E Q= w Date: Dec. 23, 2011 Project No.: 11- 041005 Designed By: SCM Drawn By: SCM Checked By: KT KYOTO GARDENS DRIVE - ABUTTING PRESERVE (LOOKING WEST) Property Line Property line Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics The Offices at City Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 FAX 561,366,1111 wvvw.udkstudos.wm #LCC000035 Copyright All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans represented by this drawing are owned by and Me property of the designer, and were created far Me exclusive use of the specified pri These ideas, designs, arrangements or plans stall not be used by, or disclosed to any person, firm, orrnrporafion w0fwu[ Me written permission of the designer. BUFFER LANDSCAPING WILL SATISFY REQUIRED LANDSCAPING FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SITE. SITE CLEARING AND LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION SHALL OCCUR WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INDIVIDUAL SITE. t � cGa 1' p PARCEL A 15.0' PROPOSED WATER MAIN IN NORTHERN PORTIONS 5' OVERLAP VARIES FROM 2 TO 5' BEHIND CURB PER SUA STANDARDS KYOTO GARDENS DRIVE - ABUTTING LAKE (LOOKING WEST) �`�f� PROPOSED GRAVITY LINE TO NEW LIFT STATION RCA CENTER DRIVE BUFFER LANDSCAPING WILL SATISFY REQUIRED LANDSCAPING FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL SITE. SHE CLEARING AND LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION SHALL OCCUR WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INOIVIDUAL SITE. 30° ACCESS EASEMENT E OVERLAP 15.0' LANDSCAPE v j Au O 0 QM 1 Iasi • • E E V Lee O LL vi c LM L i V /W m E a A P it N a L 5 G 5 ma C M y W Y L $ co =, ^�^o anew IL E X s w� Date: Project No.: Designed By: Drawn By: Checked By: Dec. 23, 2011 11- 041005 SCM SCM KT Revision Dates: 12 -2311: Cfient Review SCM 01- 12 -12: Submit PCD Amendment SCM 05 -07 -12 Owner Review SCM 10.20.12 PBGResubmibal NAM 12 -21 -12 PBGRewbmical SCM PIB2 111 1 PG, 171 TLAND Kyoto Gardens Avenue Public Bus Stop Detail CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: May 14, 2013 Petition: MISC- 13 -02- 000093 Subject/Agenda Item: Legacy Place Master Signage Plan Amendment Recommendation to City Council: A request by Miami Children's Hospital partnering with the Nicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation for the consideration of an amendment for the commercial portion of the Legacy Place Planned Community Development's (PCD) master signage package to allow for Miami Children's Hospital to have one (1) additional wall sign for a total of three (3) signs, utilize their corporate color logo, and have two (2) lines of additional copy on each sign for a total of four (4) lines of copy per sign. The Legacy Place PCD is located on the southwest corner of PGA Boulevard and Fairchild Gardens Avenue. [X] Recommendation to APPROVE [ ] Recommendation to DENY ReviewO by: Originating Dept.: Finance: PZAB Action: Direc o( of Planning & Zoni Planning &Zoning: Accountant [ ]Rec. Approval Project Manager [ ] Rec. Approval w/ Conditions. [ ] Rec. Denial Natlig M. Crowley, AICP Sarah Varga Peter Hofheinz, AICP [ ] Continued to: Planner Fees Paid: Yes City Attorney [X] Quasi — Judicial [ ] Legislative Funding Source: R. Max Lohman, Esq. [X] Public Hearing [ ] Operating Devel pment Compliance [X] Other N/A Advertised: Attachments: f [X] Required Budget Acct. #: • Development Application hbreh Wolfs, AICP [ ] Not Required N/A Date: 5/3/2013 • Waiver request Paper: Palm Beach Effective Date: memorandum Post N/A • Sign location map Approved By: Expiration Date: • Signage details City Manager Affected parties: N/A [X] Notified [ ] Not Required Ronald M. Ferris Meeting Date: May 14, 2013 MISC- 13 -02- 000093 Page 2 of 5 j. The subject request will allow the Miami's Children Hospital in partnership with the Nicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation to utilize their nationally recognized corporate logos and colors on their proposed wall signs in the portion of the Legacy Place PCD that healthcare facility will occupy. The development order (Resolution 129, 2004) adopted by City Council for the Legacy Place PCD commercial portion approved a Master Signage Program (MSP) that restricts permitted colors, number of signs, and lines of copy for signage. The Applicant is requesting one (1) additional wall sign, the ability to utilize their corporate colors and logo, and to include two (2) additional lines of copy. �rT:Zi111 � I �7 On May 3, 2001, the City Council adopted Ordinance 10, 2001, approving the rezoning of approximately 74 acres of land from Planned Development Area (PDA) to Planned Community Development (PCD), and the master site plan for Legacy Place. On July 1, 2004, the City Council adopted Resolution 129, 2004, approving an amendment to the site plan to allow for the construction of a mixed use development consisting of 399,000 square feet of commercial space, and 69,000 square feet of office space and a master signage package for the project. On August 4, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution 108, 2005, approving an amendment to Resolution 89, 2005 to specify certain times for the installation of Art in Public Places, and to amend certain conditions of approval related to landscaping. On September 6, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution 94, 2006, approving the elimination of certain conditions of approval related to the provision of shared parking in the PCD. On August 20, 2009, the City Council approved Resolution 35, 2009, approving the placement of 58 banners in the commercial portion of the PCD. On May 11, 2012, an Administrative Amendment was approved to allow the construction of a pedestrian bridge between the eastern most Parking Garage and Building H. The pedestrian bridge allows access to Building H for vehicles parking on the second floor of the parking garage. (The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.) Meeting Date: May 14, 2013 MISC- 13 -02- 000093 Page 3 of 5 The Legacy Place project has a zoning designation of Planned Community District (PCD) and a future land -use designation is Mixed Use (MD). ..• 3 Site Details The subject PCD is approximately 74 acres in size and is located on the southwest corner of PGA Boulevard and Fairchild Gardens Avenue. The site has vehicular access from PGA Boulevard, Fairchild Gardens Avenue, and Alternate AIA. Subject Request The Miami Children's Hospital in partnership with the Nicklaus Health Care Foundation is located in Building H of the Legacy Place PCD which is a rehabilitation facility for children. In an effort to provide way finding and navigation for parents bringing children to the facility under normal and potentially critical conditions, the Applicant is proposing building signage to the proposed facility. The proposed plan deviates from the approved master signage package for the commercial portion of the Legacy Place PCD. The Applicant is proposing signs that will be easily identifiable and recognizable for patients. Specifically, the Applicant is requesting to have one (1) additional wall sign, the ability to utilize their corporate logos, and two (2) additional lines of copy. The Applicant is requesting three (3) waivers for the proposed signage. Meeting Date: May 14, 2013 M I SC- 13 -02- 000093 Page 4 of 5 Waiver Request The Applicant is requesting three (3) waivers with this petition. 78 -285, Table Two (2) signs per One (1) One (1) 24, Wall Sign One (1) sign per multi- frontage additional additional Approval for Ground tenant bay tenant wall sign wall sign Floor Uses Federally Federally Non- Non- registered signs registered signs Federally Federally 78- 287(e), permitted but must can have registered registered Approval Logos be consistent with registered color corporate corporate color scheme of scheme colors colors sign program 78 -285, Table 24, Wall Sign Maximum two (2) Maximum two (2) Four (4) lines Two (2) lines Approval for Ground lines of copy lines of copy of copy of copy Floor Uses 1) The Applicant is requesting a waiver from City Code Section 78 -285, Table 24, Wall Sign for Ground Floor Uses. Ground floor uses are allowed one (1) wall sign per tenant space or bay. The City Council adopted Resolution 129, 2004 approving the Legacy Place MSP that included a waiver to allow signage for ground floor users and principal tenants located in specific buildings with additional street frontage to have two (2) signs per tenant. Approval of the waiver request will allow the Applicant to have one (1) additional wall sign for a total of three (3) signs. Staff supports the waiver request. 2) The Applicant is requesting a waiver from City Code Section 78- 287(e), Logos. Logos or federally- registered trademarks may be permitted as part of a sign if it is consistent with an approved color scheme of the master sign plan. The City Council adopted Resolution 129, 2004 approving the Legacy Place MSP that included a waiver allowing federally registered trademarks and logos with a registered color scheme to be permitted within the commercial portion of the PCD. Both the Miami Children's Hospital and Nicklaus Health Care Foundations logos are federally - registered; however, the color schemes were not part of the registration. Approval of the waiver request will allow the Applicant to utilize the Miami Children's Hospital and Nicklaus Health Care Foundation's colored logos. Staff supports the waiver request. 3) The Applicant is requesting a waiver from City Code Section 78 -285, Table 24, Wall Sign for Ground Floor Uses. Wall signs for ground floor uses are allowed a maximum of two (2) lines of copy. That Applicant is proposing to have four (4) lines of copy to identify the health care facility. Approval of the waiver request will allow the Applicant to four (4) lines of copy for each sign. Staff supports the waiver request. Meeting Date: May 14, 2013 MISC- 13 -02- 000093 Page 5 of 5 The Applicant's request was considered by staff to be consistent with approvals given to other mixed -use developments in the City. The variety of signage within mixed -use developments is appropriate because of the combination of different uses. The Miami Children's Hospital in partnership with the Nicklaus Health Care Foundation are providing a high quality healthcare and rehabilitation facility for children. Due to the nature of the use and the potential critical situations in which parents with children and emergency responders will need to locate the facility signage and way finding are very important. The sign proposed on the east elevation will only be visible from the Fairchild Gardens Avenue right -of -way. It will allow vehicles accessing the site from Fairchild Gardens Avenue to quickly identify and locate the facility. The sign on the north elevation will only be visible to people who park in the on- street parking spaces and behind the buildings across Legacy Avenue. The proposed sign on the south elevation will only be visible to people parking in the parking garage directly behind the building. All three (3) signs are being placed in locations that provide essential visibility for people needing to find and locate the facility quickly. The intent of the signage code is to facilitate the effective use of signs as a means of communication and to avoid visual clutter. The proposed locations allow the signs to be visible from each of the three (3) main directions of approach to the facility which will assist people to the facility's entrances quickly (refer to sign location map). The Applicant's proposed colors, logos, size, and architectural design are consistent with the quality and standards for the Legacy Place PCD. They communicate a safe and legible message to parents bringing children to the facility. The signs work to present a unified awareness of both non - profit organizations in connection with the facility. Staff supports the Applicant's request waivers. a .• •. • �. On March 20, 2013 the subject petition (MISC- 13 -02- 000093) was reviewed by the DRC. At this time, all certification issues have been satisfied. • • ■ - -• • • • I U l 1111• Request. Planned Community Development (PCD) jPlanned Unit Development (PUD) [ jAmendment to PCD, PUD or Site Plan Conditional Use �jAmendment to the Comprehensive Plan EAdministrative Approval f7;Administrative Appeal Project Name: Legacy Place Owner: GLL US Retail, L.P. Lei I r Annexation F'.Rezoning []Site Plan Review ( %'Concurrency Certificate []Time Extension ✓;Miscellaneous F'Other Date Submitted: Feb 7, 2013 _...._....___._.... ..... ...,_.._._ .................. _I ........ _ .......... ...... Applicant (if notOwner) :Variety Children's Hospital d /b /a Miami Children's Hospital ,ZO� 1RAFFI,11 7 Applicant's Address:3100 SW 62nd Ave., Miami, FL 331*TelephoneNo.800- 432 -6837 k $q 9 l Agent:Variety Children's Hospital d /b /a Miami Children's Hospital ContactPerson: Nikole Sanchez - Rubiera E -Mail: Nikole.Sanchez- Rubiera(c mch.gfi Agent's Mailing Address:3100 SW 62nd Ave., Miami, FL 33155 Agent's Telephone Number:800- 432 -6837 Application $ Receipt Number: Date & Time Received: Engineering$ Architect: Engineer: Planner: LandscapeArchitect: General Location. : Legacy Place, south side of PGA Blvd. between Victoria Gardens Ave. & Fairchild G Address: 11310 Legacy Ave., Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Section: Township: PropertyControl Number(s): 52- 43- 42- 06 -20- 001 -0000 Acreage: Flood Zone Current Zoning: Range: RequestedZoning: Base Flood Elevation (BFE) —to be indicated on site plan Current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation_ Existing Land Use: Requested Land Use: Proposed Use(s) i.e. hotel, single family residence,etc.: Proposed Square Footageby Use: Proposed NumberandType of Dwelling Unit(s) i.e. single family, multifamily, etc. (if applicable): N Information concerning all requests (attach additional sheets if needed.) {Section 78 -46, Application Procedures, Land Development Regulations.} 1. Explain the nature of the request: We request a miscellaneous amendment to the Legacy Place Master Sign Plan, waiver exclusive to Nicklaus Outpatient Center, for signage as in the attached elevation images -3 exterior signs (each with four lines of text, indicated colors, graphic logos containing registered trademarks of Miami Children's Hospital and Nicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation, in the typeface and colors according to their corporate branding guidelines and Exhibit B of Sublicense Agreement between them, a copy of which is attached), and 1 exterior sign with two lines of text, name and logo of Jupiter Medical Center. 2. What will be the impact of the proposed change on the surrounding area? Exterior signage on the north, south, and east walls of 11310 Legacy Avenue, building H. to include logos and up to four lines of text per sign. 3. Describe how the rezoning request complies with the City's Vision Plan and the following elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Infrastructure, Coastal Management, Conservations, Recreation and Open space, Intergovernmental Coordination and Capital Improvement. N/A il 4. How does the proposed project comply with City requirements for preservation of natural resources and native vegetation (Section 78 -301, Land Development Regulations)? MA $• How will the proposed project comply with City requirements for Art in Public Places (Chapter 78 -261, Land Development Regulations)? N/A 6. Has project received concurrency certification? N/A Date Received: ...................... ........ . ....... .... _ ........... ........_...... ......... ................... _.. ........ _. .... ...... ., jai Descriptionof the Subject Prope (Attach additional sheets if needed) Or see attached deed for legal description. The subject property is located approximately before miles) from the intersectionof dens Ave. & Fairchild Gardens A , on theQ north, east, southwest side of PGA Blvd. (street /road). M Victoria G III I I rim 601teAC4 Fm Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared GLL US Retail, L.P. who, being by me first duly sworn, on oath deposed and says: That he /she is the fee simple title owner of the property described in the attached Legal Description, miscellaneous amendment to the Legacy Place Mastei . 2. That he /she is requesting in the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. I That he /she has appointed as authorized agent on his/her behalf to accomplish the above project. Name of Owner: GLL US Retail, L.P. 1 tC Si natureof Owner 200 South Orange Ave, Suite 1920 StreetAddress P. O. Box 407 - 233 -1900 TelephoneNumber info @gll- partners.com E -mail Address Sandra Murdolo, Vice President By: Name/Title Orlando, FL 32801 City, State, Zip Code City, State, Zip Code 407 - 233 -1955 Fax Number to act Sworn and subscribed before me this dayygf b2aeugg=Y IF 2-o) III My Commission expires: AtA:2c5;.T of Z019 0 W s Applicant's I /We affirm and certify that I /we understand and will comply with the land development regulations of the City of Patin. Beach Gardens, Florida. I We further certify that the statements or diagrams made on any paper or plans submitted here with are true to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Further, I /we understand that this application, attachments, and application filing fees become a part of the official records of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and are not returnable. Applicant is: v " �'�,,` Signatureof Applicant Owner Variety Children's HosoitaLd /b /a Miami Children': Print Name of Applicant O tionee 3100 SW 62nd Avenue p StreetAddress r7 Lessee Miami, FL 33155 City, State,Zip Code jJ! Agent 800 -432 -6837 TelephoneNumber j-: Contract Purchaser Fax Number ,iditzWSanch z4ZubWa@m sue- E -Mail Address G Palm Beach Gardens Planning and Zoning Department 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 561 - 799 -4230 Permit # Financial Responsibility Form The owner understands that all City - incurred professional fees and expenses associated with the processing of this application request are ultimately the responsibility of the owner. A security deposit shall be deposited in an interest- bearing account with any accrued interest to be retained by the City of Palm Beach Gardens. The owner and /or designee shall be invoiced on a monthly basis for professional fees such as, but not limited to, consultant engineering services, legal services, advertising costs, and /or any other costs attributable to the processing of the permit for which the City incurred during the previous month. The owner and /or designee shall reimburse the City within thirty (30) days from date of invoice. If payment is not received, the City may utilize the security deposit for re- imbursement purposes. All activities related to the pending permit(s) will cease until any outstanding invoices are paid. The ownerldesignee further understands that transfer of this responsibility shall require a completed form, signed and notarized by the responsible party, and delivered to the City Planning and Zoning Department if the name and /or address of the responsible party changes at anytime during the application review process. Owner printed name DESIGNEE /BILL TO: Miami Children's Hospital 3100 SW 62nd Avenue, Miami, FL 33155 Att: Nikole Sanchez - Rubiera STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF Miami -Dade �a a 52- 43- 42- 06 -20- 001 -0000 Property Control Number Designee Acceptance Signature I h�reby certify that the foregoing to the or has produced public signature Printed name State of ® Ot( C ' C at -large went(` as acknowledged before me this day of C A k C �"� He or she is personally known as identification. My Commission expires: QkIls MIAMI 0 CHILDREN'S(�!'� HOSPITAL Nicklaus Outpatient Center MEMORANDUM To: City of Palm Beach Gardens From: Mark Greenspan, Director Architecture & Construction Date: April 5, 2013 Re: Miscellaneous Development Application for Signage at Legacy Place Miami Children's Hospital Nicklaus Outpatient Center Thank you for the opportunity to explain our request for a waiver of some of the standards and requirements applicable to signage in the Legacy Place site for the Miami Children's Hospital Nicklaus Outpatient Center. Our goals for this site include partnering with the Nicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation to provide world -class pediatric healthcare to the surrounding area and the City of Palm Beach Gardens. Our request is for a miscellaneous amendment to the Legacy Place Master Sign Plan, waiver limited to the Nicklaus Outpatient Center, for signage as shown in the attached elevation images. All proposed signs contain registered trademarks of Miami Children's Hospital and the Nicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation, in the typeface and colors according to their corporate branding guidelines for enhanced recognition, readability, and safe navigation to the facility. City Criteria: As requested by Richard J. Marrero, Principal Planner for the City, the following responds specifically to the factors for such a waiver, followed by remarks addressing the comments provided by City staff. We understand that a request for the City Council to approve a waiver from one or more of the standards and requirements applicable to a planned development, PUD, or PCD shall comply with a majority of the criteria listed below: 1. The request is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. The request is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies according to the City's comprehensive plan. The Miami Children's Hospital Nicklaus Outpatient Center is an urgent healthcare and rehabilitation facility for children. Residents and visitors to the City who use such a healthcare location may need to quickly and safely find, navigate to, park nearby, and approach the entrances. Often, parents and drivers seek such an urgent healthcare facility for children, for the first time, when the situation is urgent. b. The proposed three signs allow them to see signage from each of the three main directions of approach to the facility: (i) the northern elevation s((g�p�,� U4 , G�4• r Boulevard, (ii) the western elevation sign faces Fairchild Gardens p `t,1Voa ti -flhj i J c,�ij eastern elevation sign faces the parking garage. 44�i!! APR 06 4013 Page 1 of 4 Miami Children's Hospital & Nicklaus Foundation - signage waiver justifications c. Accordingly, the request promotes the City's goal to ensure a high quality living environment and maximize Palm Beach Gardens' resources while enhancing the health, safety, and welfare of the City's citizens, especially their children. 2. The request is consistent with the purpose and intent of this section. a. The requested signs are consistent with other signage throughout the City, and are not a detriment to adjacent properties. b. Three signs: The proposed three signs promote safe and prompt navigation from each of the three main directions of approach to the facility. c. Four lines of text: Parents and drivers with ill or injured children need signs for the children's healthcare facility that are quickly, easily, and safely legible from the three main directions of approach. The requested four lines of text provide the enhanced recognition of well -known brands, matching the logo, signage, and marketing of which people are already aware. d. Colors and logo: The requested colors and graphic logo also have similar advantages for the children's healthcare facility that are quickly, easily, and safely legible from the three main directions of approach, including enhanced recognition and legibility. e. Maximum letter size: The requested sign offers an architecturally balanced appearance which matches the size of the wall space and faces the broad and busy PGA Boulevard. f. Without the requested variance, parents and drivers may need to slow down on PGA Boulevard, and /or Fairchild Gardens Avenue to locate the healthcare facility, or may pass the site and consider a potentially dangerous U -turn, or may abruptly change lanes when they approach the location. In the special case of a healthcare facility for children, safety and accessibility considerations speak for granting the requested variance. g. The urgent healthcare treatment mission of the facility in proximity to large streets like PGA Boulevard and Fairchild Gardens Avenue, yet with current signage that is inadequate, presents a unique situation in favor of the requested variance. 3. The request is in support of and furthers the City's goals, objectives, and policies to establish development possessing architectural significance, pedestrian amenities and linkages, employment opportunities, reductions in vehicle trips, and a sense of place. a. The requested signs are consistent with existing architecture, and do not detract from the architectural quality of Legacy Place. The proposed variance will not substantially diminish or impair property values within the vicinity, because the requested signs will fit within the existing areas which accommodate such signs, and the stucco and paint will likewise match the existing wall treatment. 4. The request demonstrates that granting of the waiver will result in a development that exceeds one or more of the minimum requirements for PUDs. a. This factor was positively addressed during the PUD approval process. 5. The request for one or more waivers results from innovative design in which other minimum standards are exceeded. a. The requested signs are high quality, professional, and state of the art, including lighting. In addition, the requested signs combine the names and trademarks of the two founding not - for - profit organizations which are partnering to build and operate the children's healthcare facility. The requested combination signs thus presenting a unified awareness of both organizations in connection with the facility. Page 2 of 4 Miami Children's Hospital & Nicklaus Foundation - signage waiver justifications 6. The request demonstrates that granting of the waiver will result in preservation of valuable natural resources, including environmentally - sensitive lands, drainage and recharge areas, and coastal areas. a. This factor was positively addressed during the PUD approval process, and the request has no impact on the environment. % The request clearly demonstrates public benefits to be derived, including but not limited to such benefits as no -cost dedication of rights -of -way, extensions of pedestrian linkages outside of the project boundaries, preservation of important natural resources, and use of desirable architectural, building, and site design techniques. a. As described above, the requested signs provide safe, legible, attractive signage for parents bringing children to the facility. The requested signs are architecturally compatible, and have similar construction to other signs at Legacy Place. 8. Sufficient screening and buffering, if required, are provided to screen adjacent uses from adverse impacts caused by a waiver. a. This factor was positively addressed during the PUD approval process. 9. The request is not based solely or predominantly on economic reasons. a. Miami Children's Hospital and the Nicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation are both not- for - profit organizations, dedicated to improving pediatric healthcare. The entire purpose of the Miami Children's Hospital Nicklaus Outpatient Center is to promote public welfare, treat pediatric illness and heal injuries to children. The request is for signage to promote this goal, and is not based solely or predominantly on economic reasons. 10. The request will be compatible with existing and potential land uses adjacent to the development site. a. This factor was positively addressed during the PUD approval process. 11. The request demonstrates the development will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this section, and that such waiver or waivers will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. a. The requested signs provide attractive and legible location information placed on the three main elevations of the existing building for approach to the facility, so they will not obscure, diminish, or otherwise be detrimental to the public welfare or other property or establishments nearby. b. The proposed variance will not substantially increase congestion in the public streets. Indeed, the requested signage will reduce congestion by allowing drivers to more easily and safely find an urgent healthcare facility for their children. Accordingly, the request improves public safety by avoiding sudden, unexpected, or possibly unsafe maneuvers by drivers trying to find and navigate to the urgent pediatric care facility. The requested signs also match the attached Exhibit B of the Sublicense Agreement between Miami Children's Hospital and the Nicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation, a copy of which is attached. Page 3 of 4 Miami Children's Hospital & Nicklaus Foundation - signage waiver justifications 2. Planning and Zoning Department a. The staff commented on the following sign above: (i) four lines, (ii) three signs, and (iii) b. The staff requested the measurement of revised drawings. c. The staff inquired about the requested disruption of the current occupants. The require extensive and disruptive drilling, at 2. Building and Community Services Department age requirements, all of which are addressed maximum letter height. the building facade, which is shown in the cabinet sign, which was selected to avoid use of flush- mounted channel letters would approximately 40 points. a. Upon approval of the present waiver application, the applicant will apply for the required permits. Page 4 of 4 Miami Children's Hospital & Nicklaus Foundation - signage waiver justifications May 14, 2013 Applicant Presentation Nicklaus Outpatient Center Our vision is “To Be Where the Children Are”. Consistent with our vision, the hospital maintains a distributed network of outpatient centers. Facility opened in 2012 Affiliated with the Nicklaus Children’s Healthcare Foundation Center Location: 11310 Legacy Avenue 22,500-square-foot facility offering after-hours urgent care services, rehabilitation services, pediatric subspecialty appointments and diagnostic imaging. North Face South Face East Face Applicants Request for Waivers Our request is for a miscellaneous amendment to the Legacy Place Master Sign Plan, waiver limited to the Nicklaus Outpatient Center. Request for a waiver to allow three building signs The proposed signage allows parents to quickly and safely identify the facility from each of the three main directions of approach. Waivers Request for a waiver to allow 4 lines of text, use of color and logos Four lines of text: Parents and drivers with ill or injured children need signs for the children’s healthcare facility that are quickly, easily, and safely legible from each of the directions of approach. Colors and logo: The requested colors and graphic logo also have similar advantages for enhanced recognition and legibility. Maximum letter size: The requested sign offers an architecturally balanced appearance which matches the size of the wall space and faces the broad and busy PGA Boulevard. Waivers Continued The requested signs are consistent with existing architecture, and do not detract from the architectural quality of Legacy Place. The requested signs are high quality, professional, and state of the art, including lighting. In addition, the requested signs combine the names and trademarks of the two founding not-for-profit organizations which are partnering to build and operate the children’s healthcare facility. City Hall MuniCipal CoMplex PPUD-13-04-000049 Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board May 14, 2013 City Hall Municipal Complex Mi l i t a r y T r a i l Burns Road Johnson Dairy Road Request  Rezone to a Planned Unit Development Overly - Public / Institutional (P/I) underlying zoning to remain  Site plan update to accommodate public radio communications monopole  Request includes three (3) waivers Rezoning  Consistent with Comprehensive Plan & surrounding zoning districts  Underlying Zoning Designation of Public or Institutional (P/I) to remain site CHanges  Monopole to be located approximately 118’ to 120’ from Military Trail right- of-way  Buffered by security fence and landscaping  All ground equipment is located within the EOCC building WaiveRs Code Section Requirement Proposal Waiver Staff Support 78-159, Note 64(i), Setbacks 132 feet (110 percent of proposed height) 120 feet 12 foot deviation Approval 78-159, Note 64(j), Separation Towers separated by one (1) mile ½ mile separation ½ mile deviation Approval 78-159, Note 64(l), Height Height is limited to 100 feet for towers with one (1) users 120 feet tall 20 foot deviation Approval  Setback – Distance from underground conduit connection is critical.  Separation – Needs to be located in close proximity to the EOCC building for the required connection.  Height – 120 feet height is necessary for City-Wide coverage. Staff Supports the waiver requests.  No commercial use on monopole  Critical public safety infrastructure ReCoMMendation Staff recommends APPROVAL of petition PPUD-13-04-000049 with three (3) waivers. PGA Office Center PCD (Parcel 5A) PCDA-12-02-000013 Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board May 14, 2013 Request •Amend the PGA Office Center PCD to allow 993,000 square feet of office space and accessory uses •Design Guidelines •List of Uses Public Notice •Required public notice was met –Property signs posted –Newspaper ad published –Mailers sent to property owners within 500 feet Background •2005 – Subject site was rezoning from Research and Light Industrial Park (M1) and Planned Development Area (PDA) to PCD / M1 •2005 – PGA Office Center site plan was approved to include 240,000 sf of office, 600,000 sf of light industrial, 42,000 sf of ancillary commercial use •2008 – Subject site was platted •Existing site is largely vacant PCD Master Plan PCD Master Plan •86.34 acres •4 sub-parcels •993,000 sf office space with accessory uses •Parcel A proposed to contain 913,000 sf •Parcel B proposed to contain 80,000 sf •Site access from Kyoto Gardens Drive and RCA Center Drive Design Guidelines Setbacks Height Landscaping Signage Lighting Uses Architecture Screening Parking ratios Design Guidelines •Landscaping o Previously approved PCD Landscape Buffers will remain in place o Previously approved preserve area will remain in place o 90% native vegetation will be provided on site o Each individual site plan will be reviewed in accordance with the City’s landscape regulations •Signage o Will be consistent throughout the PCD o Master signage program will be submitted at a later time •Parking o 1 space per 300 SF of gross building area Design Guidelines •Architecture o Guidelines are applicable to all commercial and office uses within the PCD, including any future outparcels o Guidelines promote buildings that Solicit visual interest Scaled to adjacent building and surround areas Contain public spaces Provide a variety of entrances Contain multiple windows and balconies Provide pedestrian shelter (awnings, arcade, roof overhangs, porticos) Uses Helistop o Proposed approval does not allow for site plan approval of Helistop o Site Plan approval from City Council required o Will not be used for overnight parking, refueling, or maintenance o Not accessible to general public o Restricted to use by owner of Parcel A only o Proposing 800-foot setback from any residential neighborhood o Flight routes and heights have been adjusted to minimize any noise experience from the helipad o Institute the “Fly Neighborly” program o Transportation facility necessary to FPL’s operations, specifically during inclement weather Location Map Waivers Code Section Requirement Proposal Waiver Staff Support 78-153 Table 12 50 feet Parcel A - 165 feet Parcel B - 90 feet Parcel A – 115 feet Parcel B – 40 feet Approval •Buildings will be designed in consideration of the existing residential areas to the north of the subject site through the tiering plan. •Height is consistent with 2006 Height Visioning Workshops held by the City •Consistent with existing buildings along PGA Corridor o Parcel A maximum height of 165 feet (12-15 stories) o Parcel B maximum height of 90 feet o Tallest buildings will be located toward I-95 and PGA Blvd o Shortest buildings located closest to residential area o Consistent with the 2006 Height and Visioning Workshops o Additional setbacks required for buildings taller than 50 feet Recommendation Staff recommends Approval of petition PCDA -12-02-000013 Land Development Regulations Amendment LDRA-13-01-000045 Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Request •Amend various sections of the City’s LDR’s –Eliminate inconsistencies –Remove duplicate verbiage –Simplify restrictions –Relocate certain sections for better organization –Address items currently not addressed in code Proposed Changes •Public Notice –Added notice provisions for PUD / PCD Amendments, Major / Minor Site Plans, Major / Minor Site Plan Amendments –Allow mailers for non-adoption hearings to be sent 1st class mail •Height Restrictions –Simplified language Existing: Maximum height of 2 Story / 36 ft. Proposed : Maximum height of 36 ft. Proposed Changes •Waivers –Eliminated ability to waive uses •Chart of Permitted Uses –Added use category for Microbrewery and Counseling Services & corresponding definition •Seasonal Lighting –Simplified existing language to a fixed time frame –No permit required Proposed Changes •Fences/Walls –Increased allowable height for perimeter fences from 6’ to 8’ •Sign Code –Added minimum distance requirements between monument signs –Allow menuboard signs for drive-through facilities –Added category for Canopy Directional Signs for drive-through facilities (ex. banks, hospitals, medical office buildings) –Added category for Traffic Directional / Parking Control Signs Proposed Changes •Nonconforming Uses –Simplified the time frame related to the cessation of a nonconforming use Existing: 6 consecutive months or for 18 months in 3 consecutive years Proposed: 6 consecutive months Recommendation Staff recommends approval of petition LDRA-13-01-000045 MiaMi Children’s hospital at legaCy plaCe MisC-13-02-000093 planning, Zoning, and appeals Board May 14, 2013 request Amendment to the Legacy Place Master Signage Program, specifically for the Miami Children’s Hospital (Building H) to allow:  One (1) additional wall sign  Utilize corporate colors  Two (2) additional lines of copy for each sign BaCkground 2001 – Master Site Plan for Legacy Place approved (Ordinance 10, 2001) 2004 – Master Signage Package approved with Resolution 129, 2004 2012 – Pedestrian bridge approved between parking garage and Building H projeCt details Proposing three (3) wall signs. Each sign only visible from respective right-of-way signage elevations n orth  North sign will face Legacy Avenue (internal to PCD)  Provides way finding & navigation for patients utilizing parking across the street signage elevations  South sign will face parking garage behind Building H  Located on ground floor elevation  Important visibility for patients parking in the garage south signage elevations east  East sign will face Fairchild Gardens Avenue  Located on second floor elevation  Important visibility for patients and emergency vehicles from Fairchild Gardens Avenue right-of-way Waivers Code Section Requirement Approved with Master Signage Package Proposal Waiver Staff Support 78-285, Table 24, Wall Sign for Ground Floor Uses One (1) sign per tenant bay Two (2) signs per multi- frontage tenant One (1) additional wall sign One (1) additional wall sign Approval 78-287(e), Logos Federally registered signs permitted but must be consistent with color scheme of sign program Federally registered signs can have registered color scheme Non-Federally registered corporate colors Non-Federally registered corporate colors Approval 78-285, Table 24, Wall Sign for Ground Floor Uses Maximum two (2) lines of copy Maximum two (2) lines of copy Four (4) lines of copy Two (2) lines of copy Approval  Resolution 129, 2004 approved Master Signage Package which included two (2) waivers  One (1) additional wall sign for East Elevation  Utilize corporate color and logo  Include two (2) additional lines of copy Waivers Staff Supports Waiver Requests: Signs visible only from respective elevation direction Provides essential visibility of the facility’s location from each of the three (3) main directions of approach Design is consistent with the quality and standards for Legacy Place PCD reCoMMendation Staff recommends APPROVAL of petition MISC-13-02-000093. Mission critical public safety component Hardening of communications infrastructure Vital back-up as part of emergency ops plan Increase integrity of police radio system Provides direct connection with 9-1-1 dispatch Avoid single point of failure in emergencies Part of countywide microwave coverage ring No commercial lease space; public safety only Countywide Ring 120 ft. monopole 4 ft. base screened & landscaped from view Tapered to 18 inches at top 175 mph wind rating Two microwave antennas (3 ft & 4 ft) Two ‘broom-handle’ pole antennas (6 ft) 20 ft. north of EOCC 120 ft. east of Military Trail City of Palm Beach Gardens Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Public Hearing May 14, 2013 PGA Office Center PGA Office Center Location PGA Office Center Location 86.34 acres ROS - Recreation and Open Space I – Industrial C- Commercial MXD – Mixed Use DRI – PO (Professional Office) PO RL – Residential Low PGA Office Center Location o 1999 – Parcel 5a included as part of the Forbearance Agreement – Designated for Industrial uses with an intensity up to 0.35 FAR, which equals 1.3 million square feet of Industrial uses. o 2000 – Traffic Concurrency granted: o 240,000 SF of Office Use o 600,000 SF of Industrial Use o 2001 – 10 Acre Upland Preserve Established - to meet preserve requirements for Legacy Place, Parcels 5a and 5b. o 2005 – Parcel 5a PCD approved 240,000 SF of Office, including 42,000 of commercial/retail 600,000 SF of Industrial Space o 2008 - Palm Beach County approved a concurrency amendment o 200 Room Hotel o 60 Room Boutique Hotel o 450,000 SF of Office o 450,000 SF of Research and Development o 2011 – Condition of approval modified to indicate change in timing for supplemental planting for 10-acre preserve PGA Office Center History o Amend Development Plan – o 993,000 SF of Office Use o Revise Master Plan- o 2 development parcels o Parcel A – Owned by FPL – up to 913,000 SF of office use o Parcel B – Owned by Spearfisher – up to 80,000 SF of office use o Reduces approved trip generation for project o Create Design Guidelines o Requires additional architectural enhancements o Allows taller building heights with additional building setbacks o Create predictability in the quality of design PGA Office Center Request o 2005 – Parcel 5a Planned Community Development Approved. o 240,000 SF of Office Use (including 42,000 SF of commercial) o 600,000 SF of Industrial Use o 17 development parcels o 2011 – Condition of Approval Modified - underlying zoning from Public/Institutional (PI) to Mixed Use (MXD) to be consistent with Future Land Use designation PGA Office Center Approved Master Plan PGA Office Center Requested Master Plan o Establishes Master Plan for future office campus – o No buildings are proposed o Site Plan Review by City required o Established Building Heights with additional Building Setbacks - o Parcel A – 10-12 stories with maximum building height of 165’ o Parcel B – 90 foot maximum building height o Taller buildings located closer to I-95 and PGA Boulevard fly-over o No buildings within 400 feet of existing neighborhoods o Limit Permitted Uses o Only Office and accessory uses permitted o No Industrial, Warehousing or Manufacturing Uses proposed o Accessory uses include helistop, cafeteria, employee health center PGA Office Center Request PGA Office Center Design Guidelines o Act as land development regulations for project. o Establish maximum building heights o Establishes parking o Establishes uses o Signage o Architectural standards o Sustainability PGA Office Center Building Height and Setbacks •Minimum 400’ building setback from residents •Tiered building heights with transitional building massing PGA Office Center o Request of Helistop as a Permitted Use o Siting to be determined during Site Plan Approval o Major conditional use o Not used for overnight parking, repairs or refueling o Helistop is needed to: o Transport employees to facilities and power plants o Use to prepare for and access damage after emergency Helistop PGA Office Center What is a Helistop? Code states: “Helistop or helipad means an area used for landing or takeoff of helicopters or other aircraft capable of hovering, excluding any facilities for repair, refueling, or short- or long-term parking.” Helistop FPL Juno Beach Campus PGA Office Center Helistop PGA Office Center Helistop to be a Minimum of 800 feet from Residential Neighborhood This enhanced setback is eight times the required distance between industrial uses and residential areas. Helistop PGA Office Center FPL has committed to the “Fly Neighborly” program for the PGA Office Center project. This program, created by the Helicopter Association International, calls for: •Fly at an altitude that is as high as practical; •Avoid residential areas when possible; •Avoid late night/early morning flights; •Identify noise sensitive areas and adjust routes to avoid them to the extent possible. FPL uses this program at its Juno Beach campus. Helistop PGA Office Center Helistop 550 feet 800 foot setback zone Juno Beach Town Hall confirms that they have not received any complaints regarding helicopter noise or use. PGA Office Center o Monument sign to meet city standards o Each signage facing PGA Boulevard and Interstate 95 o Each building sign limited to 90 SF o No building signs facing North Signage PGA Office Center Traffic o Current Concurrency Approval o Traffic Improvements already constructed o Four-lane Kyoto Gardens Drive o Future Traffic Improvements Land Use Daily Trips (New Net External Trips) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Approved 8,608 1,124 933 191 1,048 213 835 Proposed 7,032 1,059 932 127 926 157 769 Difference -1,576 -65 -1 -64 -122 -56 -66 PGA Office Center Landscape Buffers 516’ Across Buffer and ROW 743’ Across Buffer and ROW PGA Office Center Questions? PGA Office Center Landscape Buffers •Minimum 90% native trees •Buffers meet and exceed city requirements •10 acre preserve •Elevated roadways surrounding site PGA Office Center Building Height and Setbacks In 2006, the city held several workshops regarding building height in the city. PGA Office Center PGA Office Center Architectural Design Standards o Transitional Massing of adjacent Building Heights o Buildings within 100 feet of each other with one being twice the height must provide intermediate massing elements Graphic illustration only Graphic illustration only Graphic illustration only PGA Office Center Architectural Design Standards o Preferred building materials identified for exterior elevations. o Stucco, stone, concrete, metal, glass allowed. Graphic illustration only Graphic illustration only Graphic illustration only PGA Office Center Architectural Design Standards o Architectural Features Provided, such as: o Canopies/Arcades o Architectural elements o Four different building materials o Decorative Tower features Graphic illustration only Graphic illustration only Graphic illustration only PGA Office Center Architectural Design Standards o Sustainability Measures Provided, including: o Construction Anti-Pollution Prevention o Bicycle Storage o Fuel Efficient Vehicles o Additional Open Space o Storm Water Quality o Water Use Reduction Graphic illustration only Graphic illustration only Graphic illustration only PGA Office Center Building Height and Setbacks PGA Office Center Building Height and Setbacks City of Palm Beach Gardens Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Public Hearing May 14, 2013 PGA Office Center PGA Office Center Location PGA Office Center Location 86.34 acres ROS - Recreation and Open Space I – Industrial C- Commercial MXD – Mixed Use DRI – PO (Professional Office) PO RL – Residential Low PGA Office Center Location o 1999 – Parcel 5a included as part of the Forbearance Agreement – Designated for Industrial uses with an intensity up to 0.35 FAR, which equals 1.3 million square feet of Industrial uses. o 2000 – Traffic Concurrency granted: o 240,000 SF of Office Use o 600,000 SF of Industrial Use o 2001 – 10 Acre Upland Preserve Established - to meet preserve requirements for Legacy Place, Parcels 5a and 5b. o 2005 – Parcel 5a PCD approved 240,000 SF of Office, including 42,000 of commercial/retail 600,000 SF of Industrial Space o 2008 - Palm Beach County approved a concurrency amendment o 200 Room Hotel o 60 Room Boutique Hotel o 450,000 SF of Office o 450,000 SF of Research and Development o 2011 – Condition of approval modified to indicate change in timing for supplemental planting for 10-acre preserve PGA Office Center History o Amend Development Plan – o 993,000 SF of Office Use o Revise Master Plan- o 2 development parcels o Parcel A – Owned by FPL – up to 913,000 SF of office use o Parcel B – Owned by Spearfisher – up to 80,000 SF of office use o Reduces approved trip generation for project o Create Design Guidelines o Requires additional architectural enhancements o Allows taller building heights with additional building setbacks o Create predictability in the quality of design PGA Office Center Request o 2005 – Parcel 5a Planned Community Development Approved. o 240,000 SF of Office Use (including 42,000 SF of commercial) o 600,000 SF of Industrial Use o 17 development parcels o 2011 – Condition of Approval Modified - underlying zoning from Public/Institutional (PI) to Mixed Use (MXD) to be consistent with Future Land Use designation PGA Office Center Approved Master Plan PGA Office Center Requested Master Plan o Establishes Master Plan for future office campus – o No buildings are proposed o Site Plan Review by City required o Established Building Heights with additional Building Setbacks - o Parcel A – 10-12 stories with maximum building height of 165’ o Parcel B – 90 foot maximum building height o Taller buildings located closer to I-95 and PGA Boulevard fly-over o No buildings within 400 feet of existing neighborhoods o Limit Permitted Uses o Only Office and accessory uses permitted o No Industrial, Warehousing or Manufacturing Uses proposed o Accessory uses include helistop, cafeteria, employee health center PGA Office Center Request PGA Office Center Design Guidelines o Act as land development regulations for project. o Establish maximum building heights o Establishes parking o Establishes uses o Signage o Architectural standards o Sustainability PGA Office Center Building Height and Setbacks •Minimum 400’ building setback from residents •Tiered building heights with transitional building massing PGA Office Center o Request of Helistop as a Permitted Use o Siting to be determined during Site Plan Approval o Major conditional use o Not used for overnight parking, repairs or refueling o Helistop is needed to: o Transport employees to facilities and power plants o Use to prepare for and access damage after emergency Helistop PGA Office Center What is a Helistop? Code states: “Helistop or helipad means an area used for landing or takeoff of helicopters or other aircraft capable of hovering, excluding any facilities for repair, refueling, or short- or long-term parking.” Helistop FPL Juno Beach Campus PGA Office Center Helistop PGA Office Center Helistop to be a Minimum of 800 feet from Residential Neighborhood This enhanced setback is eight times the required distance between industrial uses and residential areas. Helistop PGA Office Center FPL has committed to the “Fly Neighborly” program for the PGA Office Center project. This program, created by the Helicopter Association International, calls for: •Fly at an altitude that is as high as practical; •Avoid residential areas when possible; •Avoid late night/early morning flights; •Identify noise sensitive areas and adjust routes to avoid them to the extent possible. FPL uses this program at its Juno Beach campus. Helistop PGA Office Center Helistop 550 feet 800 foot setback zone Juno Beach Town Hall confirms that they have not received any complaints regarding helicopter noise or use. PGA Office Center o Monument sign to meet city standards o Each signage facing PGA Boulevard and Interstate 95 o Each building sign limited to 90 SF o No building signs facing North Signage PGA Office Center Traffic o Current Concurrency Approval o Traffic Improvements already constructed o Four-lane Kyoto Gardens Drive o Future Traffic Improvements Land Use Daily Trips (New Net External Trips) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Total In Out Total In Out Approved 8,608 1,124 933 191 1,048 213 835 Proposed 7,032 1,059 932 127 926 157 769 Difference -1,576 -65 -1 -64 -122 -56 -66 PGA Office Center Landscape Buffers 516’ Across Buffer and ROW 743’ Across Buffer and ROW PGA Office Center Questions? PGA Office Center Landscape Buffers •Minimum 90% native trees •Buffers meet and exceed city requirements •10 acre preserve •Elevated roadways surrounding site PGA Office Center Building Height and Setbacks In 2006, the city held several workshops regarding building height in the city. PGA Office Center PGA Office Center Architectural Design Standards o Transitional Massing of adjacent Building Heights o Buildings within 100 feet of each other with one being twice the height must provide intermediate massing elements Graphic illustration only Graphic illustration only Graphic illustration only PGA Office Center Architectural Design Standards o Preferred building materials identified for exterior elevations. o Stucco, stone, concrete, metal, glass allowed. Graphic illustration only Graphic illustration only Graphic illustration only PGA Office Center Architectural Design Standards o Architectural Features Provided, such as: o Canopies/Arcades o Architectural elements o Four different building materials o Decorative Tower features Graphic illustration only Graphic illustration only Graphic illustration only PGA Office Center Architectural Design Standards o Sustainability Measures Provided, including: o Construction Anti-Pollution Prevention o Bicycle Storage o Fuel Efficient Vehicles o Additional Open Space o Storm Water Quality o Water Use Reduction Graphic illustration only Graphic illustration only Graphic illustration only PGA Office Center Building Height and Setbacks PGA Office Center Building Height and Setbacks Charter Schools = Public Schools Today Our Future Renaissance Schools: A-Rated Success X Agreed To Traffic Mitigation Before First Day of School Warning Yellow Flasher Two State Certified Crossing Guards Police Officer at Northlake Blvd. and Hiatt Drive (if desired) Prior to Enrollment Exceeding 675 Hiatt Drive Improvements Future Re-Timing Traffic Signal (Palm Beach County initiates) Right Turn Lane on Northlake Boulevard (if you want it) Simmons & White, Inc. Robert F. Rennebaum, P.E. Traffic and Civil Engineering Tonight’s Presentation •PBC Traffic Performance Standards •Hiatt Drive •On-Site Operations Traffic Performance Standards Project meets all PBC TPS on Northlake Boulevard and the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive Aerial Location Site Plan Hiatt Drive •2L POA Roadway •24’ Pavement •25 MPH Posted Speed Limit •Very Low Volumes •Weekday Office, Industrial, Montessori School, Chatsworth Uses •Weekend and Weekday Evening City Park Activities •Existing Sidewalk Hiatt Drive Volumes & Capacity Phase 1 – 675 Students Capacity Total w/ School V/C Daily AM Peak PM Peak 15,200 880 880 3706 295 178 25% 33% 20% Phase 1 Trip Comparison 675 Student Trip Generation Daily Trips: 1674 AM Peak Hour Entering: 133 PM Peak Hour Exiting: 68 1607 200 187 Permitted Square Footage Phase 1 Improvements – 675 Students 1. School Signs 2. Sidewalk & Crosswalk 3. State Certified Crossing Guards Phase 1 Improvements – 675 Students 1. School Signs 2. Sidewalk & Crosswalk 3. State Certified Crossing Guards 4. Pedestrian and Bicycle Route + Registration 1. School Signs 2. Sidewalk & Crosswalk 3. State Certified Crossing Guards 4. Pedestrian and Bicycle Route + Registration 5. Advanced Warning Flasher and School signs on Northlake Blvd Phase 1 Improvements – 675 Students 1. School Signs 2. Sidewalk & Crosswalk 3. State Certified Crossing Guards 4. Pedestrian and Bicycle Route + Registration 5. Advanced Warning Flasher and School signs on Northlake Blvd No School Zone Flasher Recommended 6. No Flasher Recommended Phase 1 and Phase 2 Operational Plan •Morning Care and After Care •Staggered Start Times •Siblings •No Buses •Aggressive Carpool Registration •On-Site Stacking •Comprehensive Parent Education Process UNPRECEDENTED 225 VEHICLE ON-SITE STORAGE FOB SYSTEM Phase 1 and Phase 2 Operational Plan 31 VEHICLE PICK UP/ DROP OFF 40 VEHICLE STAGING AREA Phase 1 and Phase 2 Operational Plan Hiatt Drive Volumes & Capacity Total Enrollment – 1140 Students Capacity Total w/ School V/C Daily AM Peak PM Peak 15,200 880 880 4859 387 225 32% 44% 26% Future Improvements (Prior to Enrollment Exceeding 675 Students) EASTBOUND LEFT TURN LANE INTO SCHOOL DUAL SOUTHBOUND LEFT TURN LANES AND SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS 3-LANE HIATT DRIVE City Staff requested the Palm Beach County Traffic Division to re-evaluate the previous TPS approval •NO RIGHT TURN LANE REQUIRED •MEETS SAFETY STANDARDS Northlake Boulevard Westbound Right Turn Lane Northlake Boulevard Westbound Right Turn Lane Applicant will construct an advanced warning sign with flasher •Slow Speeds •Eliminate “NATURAL ACCELERATION” Concerns •Increase Safety FDOT/PBC Sight Distance Standard for 55 MPH is 495’ PGA Boulevard (Less than 500’) Northlake Boulevard (Greater than 1500’) From Intersection Looking East Northlake Boulevard Westbound Right Turn Lane PGA Boulevard (Less than 500’) Northlake Boulevard Westbound Right Turn Lane Northlake Boulevard (Greater than 1500’) At 1500’ •Over 3 times required Sight Distance •Grade MAXIMIZES Sight Distance with “Stadium Effect” •Northlake Boulevard is very “Directional” •Low Westbound traffic in AM peak hour •Low Westbound traffic during early afternoon dismissal prior to PM peak hour of Northlake Boulevard Northlake Boulevard Westbound Right Turn Lane •Weekend City Park use during sporting events similar to weekday school use •3-year historical accident analysis revealed NO accidents due to lack of right turn lane •Safety is everyone’s priority •Weekday evening City park activities currently occurring during PM peak hour of Northlake Boulevard Northlake Boulevard Westbound Right Turn Lane Simulation Model Confirms safe and efficient operation Conclusions •Project meets PBC TPS •Palm Beach Garden’s intersection requirements met •100% on-site vehicle storage •FOB system •Phase 1 traffic similar to permitted traffic •Hiatt Drive reconstructed to 3-lanes •School is committed to on-going monitoring and mitigation program to ensure safe and efficient operations •No demonstrated need for a right turn lane on Northlake Boulevard based on Safety Tercilla Courtemanche Architects Rene Tercilla, AIA Architecture Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. Donaldson Hearing, ASLA Site Plan & Landscape Architecture Landscape Plan Plant Pallete Hiatt Drive Median Rendering Request: Recommend Approval with Conditions Staff Proposed Conditions As Written 1-17 and 19-25. Staff Proposed Conditions with modifications 26, 27, 29, and 30. Change only to provide that conditions met prior to enrollment exceeding 675 students. Additional Conditions Agreed to by Applicant (if desired) Provide Police Officer at Northlake/Hiatt intersection during drop off and pick up until Hiatt Modifications completed. If City and County determine Right Turn Lane required in future, pay proportionate share for lane. Renaissance Charter School PUDA-12-12-000047 CUMJ-12-12-000026 Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board May 14, 2013 Request •Site Plan amendment to the PGA Commerce Park PUD for the Renaissance Charter School •Major Conditional Use approval for 1,140- student charter school (K-8) •1 waiver Location Map Subject Site PGA National Northlake Blvd. Tu r n p i k e Montecito BallenIsles Steeplechase PGA Commerce Park Northlake Blvd. Tu r n p i k e Hiatt Drive PGA Commerce Park City Park PGA Commerce Park Tu r n p i k e Hiatt Drive City Park Northlake Blvd. Lot 7 Lot 8 Background •1986 – PGA National Commerce Park PUD approved within the PGA National DRI •1997 – Site plan for Lot 7 of the Commerce Park PUD was approved for 14,000 SF office and 12,000 SF warehouse •1999 – Site plan for Lots 7 and 8 of the Commerce Park PUD was approved for 127,317 SF office and warehouse –One office building and warehouse building exist on site –One unbuilt office building –All buildings are currently vacant –Previously occupied by Stainsafe and Global Care Solutions (vacated around 2009) –There is an open Code Enforcement case for the subject site for construction and maintenance of parking and landscaping areas Site Plan •10.30 acres •1,140-student (K-8) Public Charter School •Current Approvals Warehouse 61,317 sf Office 26,000 sf Office 40,000 sf •Proposed School 61,317 sf Accessory uses 26,000 sf •Outdoor recreation areas •Access via private roadway owned by the Commerce Park POA Proposed School Elevations Building #1 33’4” South Elevation West Elevation 33’4” North Elevation East Elevation Proposed School Elevations Building #1 East Elevation West Elevation 26’2” 16’9” Proposed School Elevations Building #2 North Elevation South Elevation Proposed School Elevations Building #2 Traffic Circulation - Cars •Staggered drop-off o 6:30am – Early drop-off o 7:30 – 5-8 Classes o 8:30 – K-4 Classes •Staggered pick-up o 3:00pm – K-4 dismissed o 2:30pm – 5-8 dismissed o After-care until 6pm •FOB system proposed Traffic Circulation - Cars •Capable of stacking 225 cars on- site •Trained Staff Members located at “pick-up/drop-off” area and at crosswalk •31 pick-up/drop-off spaces •No buses proposed Traffic Circulation - Pedestrians •Hiatt has an existing sidewalk on one side of the roadway •Applicant proposing to extend a small portion of the existing sidewalk to connect to the subject site Proposed Traffic Improvements •Dedicated eastbound left-turn lane on Hiatt Drive turning into the site •Second westbound through-lane on Hiatt Drive •Dual southbound left-turn lanes on Hiatt Drive turning onto Northlake Blvd. Proposed Traffic Improvements Eastbound Left-Turn Lane Proposed Traffic Improvements Second Westbound Through- Lane Proposed Traffic Improvements Dual Southbound Left-Turn Lanes Waivers Code Section Requirement Proposal Waiver Staff Support 78-313(b) Min. Landscaping Max. sod area of 40% 57% sod area 17% Approval •The Applicant is increasing the existing green areas on the site and exceeding the total number of landscape points required by City Code. A large landscape area is proposed on the east side of the warehouse building where the existing loading docks are located. The addition of landscaping in this area as well as a tot lot and a recreational field would be a supportive element to the proposed use. Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment •Traffic Impacts of Proposed Use •Impacts to Adjacent Property Owners •Impacts to Landscaping on Hiatt Drive •Proposed Phasing •Proposed Architecture Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Traffic Impacts Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Traffic Impacts •The proposed school use has a substantially greater traffic impact than the existing warehouse / office uses •The school would generate more than 5x as many daily trips as the existing use. •Over 1,000 more trips generated during the AM peak-hour •The traffic study submitted by the Applicant was reviewed by PBC Traffic Division and the City’s traffic consultant for compliance with the County’s TPS •County TPS requires the analysis of the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Hiatt Drive, but the impacts to Hiatt Drive are not a required element of the Applicant’s traffic study, since it is a private roadway Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Traffic Impacts Hiatt Drive Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Impacts to Adjacent Property Owners Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Impacts to Adjacent Property Owners •Majority of businesses arrive on site during the school’s drop-off time frame •100% of traffic generated by the school would travel on Hiatt Drive to get in and out of the site •All traffic must use the private 2-lane roadway Tu r n p i k e Hiatt Drive City Park Northlake Blvd. Subject Site Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Impacts to Adjacent Property Owners Tu r n p i k e Hiatt Drive City Park Northlake Blvd. Subject Site •Unbuilt entitlements will generate additional impacts and increase potential conflicts between the school and the existing businesses LRP 64,985 SF of office use 45,100 SF of warehouse use Chatsworth 64,955 SF (56 beds) of ALF Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Impacts to Adjacent Property Owners Tu r n p i k e Hiatt Drive City Park Northlake Blvd. Subject Site Chatsworth EMS Calls Weekly Avg. = 3.9 Monthly Avg. = 15.5 Yearly Avg. = 130 Calls since 01/2012 = 224 Midnight-7am = 55 calls 7am – 10am = 37 calls 10am – 3pm = 48 calls 3pm – 6pm = 25 calls 6pm – Midnight = 59 calls Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Impacts to Existing Landscaping •Current signal contains an exclusive left-turn lane and a through / right-turn lane Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Impacts to Existing Landscaping •Applicant proposing dual left-turn lanes a through / right-turn lane •Additional signal head would need to be added •Signal timing would nee to be adjusted by Palm Beach County Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Impacts to Existing Landscaping Oak Tree Palm Tree Shrubs located in the affected areas are also proposed to be removed Main entrance to the City’s park Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Impacts to Existing Landscaping Existing Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Impacts to Existing Landscaping Proposed Existing Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Impacts to Existing Landscaping Proposed Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Proposed Phasing Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Proposed Phasing •The Applicant is requesting the City to accept a phased enrollment schedule •Expecting 675 students in year 1 •Proposes to delay off-site improvements until the start of year 2 •Phasing approach is not an enforceable measure •Staff is not supportive of the school opening without all traffic improvements being completed Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Proposed Architecture Building #1 •The proposed architecture is not consistent with the City’s Design Guidelines for Non-Residential Development •No variety in roof line •Buildings have not be modified to reflect pedestrian-scaled architecture •Large spans of blank walls •Pedestrian coverings are not scaled to be useful for pedestrians •Monotonous exterior wall finishes. No variety in finishes. •Minimal recesses provided Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Proposed Architecture Building #2 Issues with Proposed PUD Amendment Proposed Architecture •The proposed architecture is not consistent with the City’s Design Guidelines for Non-Residential Development •Minimal variety in roof line •Buildings have not be modified to reflect pedestrian-scaled architecture •Large spans of blank walls. Lack of windows. •Pedestrian coverings are not scaled to be useful for pedestrians •Monotonous exterior wall finishes. No variety in finishes. •No recesses provided Major Conditional Use •The proposed school use does not meet the Major Conditional Use criteria listed in Section 78-52 of the City’s Code. Overview •The proposed school would generate significantly more trips than the existing use •The proposed school would impact Hiatt Drive and the surrounding property owners within the commerce park •The proposed traffic improvements would cause signature landscaping at the City’s park entrance to be eliminated •Improvements are proposed to be completed prior to the second school year –School would operate with 675 students under current roadway conditions (2- lane road, non-exclusive left-turn signal) •Proposed architecture does not meet the City’s standards Recommendation Staff recommends Denial of petitions PUDA -12-12-000047 and CUMJ-12-12-000026 Issues with Proposed Site Plan Amendment Impacts to Existing Landscaping Issues with Proposed Site Plan Amendment Impacts to Existing Landscaping Issues with Proposed Site Plan Amendment Impacts to Existing Landscaping Existing Traffic Light •Current signal contains solid green lights, no exclusive turn arrows exist today •Traffic exiting Hiatt to go eastbound on Northlake must yield to Montecito traffic •Current signal gives 25 sec. of green time to Hiatt Drive •With NO delays due to oncoming traffic, approximately 10 cars would clear the left -turn lane during the AM and PM peak- hour •Applicant is proposing to open the school with the current signal conditions Proposed Traffic Light Scenario •Applicant proposing 12 sec. of green time for the dual left-turn lanes during AM peak-hour •The signal head would be modified to include exclusive left-turn arrows •With these changes, approximately 23 cars would clear the left-turn lanes (based on 12 sec. of green time) •The school is proposing to release 31 cars at a time from the on-site queue, which would take two (2) light cycles to clear the left-turn lanes (based on 12 sec. of green time) •PBC ultimately sets the amount of green time given to Hiatt Drive during permitting Proposed Traffic Improvements •Dedicated eastbound left-turn lane on Hiatt Drive turning into the site o Proposing 220 feet of storage with 50-foot taper o Applicant is proposing to complete the improvement prior to the second year of school •Second westbound through-lane on Hiatt Drive o Significantly impacts existing landscaping o Applicant is proposing to complete the improvement prior to the second year of school •Dual southbound left-turn lanes on Hiatt Drive turning onto Northlake Blvd. o Proposing 250 feet of storage with 100-foot taper o Requires modification of signal to add an exclusive left turn arrow o Requires modification of signal timing o Significantly impacts existing landscaping o Applicant is proposing to complete the improvement prior to the second year of school Traffic •Hiatt Drive is a 2-lane private roadway o Owned by PGA Commerce Park POA o Provides access to approximately 9 properties •To mitigate impacts to Hiatt Drive, the City is requesting the following improvements: o Dedicated eastbound left-turn lane on Hiatt Drive turning into the site o Dual southbound left-turn lanes on Hiatt Drive turning onto Northlake Blvd. o All improvements must be completed prior to the school opening •Measurements of turnpike overpass Pl e ase Print Name: Address: City: Comments From The Public Request to Address City Council Subject: f '-'A /UA T/tJ!f/d L. C () m m {.--:-tt c 4-fl A R. k. <¢( Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" Portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the C ity Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: Address: COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council City: ----------~rf-~--'-'1>£ Subject: · e{A;ji---5'(LL;( ~( rylembers of the public may address the City Council du~ing the "Comments by the Public" _.portion of t~e agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council. must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: City: Su~t: . w ( COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City· Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public He·ari.ngs". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: Address: COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council . . "" City: ___ __.B,.....lo!IJL:::....!...(..L::.~~~..t?~~.=...::::..:....:~~~~~-_..;.. ---41'--pc_:__ _______ ------"----~ Subject: ·{kkb. ~ I P6--A . Nt~-,f,'W'vt fw~ <s tA-~ Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public:Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting . The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council J:i~J<?=r~ .. > GJ-l!)ss k1 <an AddreS$: /£/ · --/A",a ·c:M\~.11' . --;;};).,..-· City: -r/:5 &- I Subject: I .-~· r-....... / ~ Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the · agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: Address: City: Subject: =:t~ COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council .. Members· of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" _.portion of ttie agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council. must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is ·limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: Subject: Comments From The Public Request to Address City Council lY\IG~ut\ fAv6 Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" Portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: Address: Subject: -:\\ Comments From The Public Request to Address City Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" Portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name : COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council .. rylembers· of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" .'portion of t~e agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council. must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Name : }2:t CH,A(..J? Pv g.g Address : City: \..J~u.1....JE6.0.....:~w41__:F=---..::L=---------------------- Subject: ~ ·~· . ,· Members· of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" .·portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This. Request to Address the City Council. must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is ·limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: Address: Comments From The Public Request to Address City Council City: ___ ]!~~_6 ______________________ ~,· Subject: /U?r:dJ7:%'~ ~ ~\ Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" Portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City-Council Please Print Name: ,_/ t' W\ )J a v f-;_ lit ; Address: g 6u j-/;!1-r L J2a I ve- E~ ~ g~ ~ (ltfllv~s City: Subject: tb ~ l Pv e-> 7 Pu A P~ (L 'b ~vv.w<.-(.z_ A 'f. <;o ~ ~ "h'""- fylembers of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" .-portion of t~e agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council _ must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is -limited to three (3) minutes. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print 1\ _ Name: _<.,..;:o,o)~e_n..;._n_\_fr.__·..;.__..;_~......:.,..._....;....=......=..;;..;;~fL--__________ _ Address:_~_O __ IS __ -=g~o~N __ l ~-~----~B~~~~---------------------------------­ City:_...;....f1_P<LM __ ..!.,;;;,~...;....:.....;;;.._:_.....,l~..:::;..J......~·--=-------.;....._-------- O_e "IJA:~ ~ ~ 1 1~nl Su~ect: __ ~~~~~--~--~------~~~~~~==~~~~~~-=~~---------------------------- -/F-( Se-HJJl, ffilr:~-~ ~ '?vNt!\16- Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: Address: City: Subject: COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: Address: City: Subject: ----~----·----- Comments From The Public Request to Address City Council J Jl! Members of the public may address the C ity Council during the "Comments by the Public" Portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: Address: City: Subject: Comments From The Public Request to Address City Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" Portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: Address: City: Subject: Comments From The Public Request to Address City Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" Portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council ~ '7-A-CA-JS T::.o ,.J e. Address:· tl __ L£.;//-iJ 6 TD"-J /FH-Jc f.&t. # ~ City: __ f>~~...,=....(O~--------------------- Subject: ~ ~trl-oo 1 ~ ~4~~·· Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City· Council Address:. I D ?..7'2-A-j I t1 ·~ ~~r;( 5 8 f vet( City: ~)\A-. 6~/.... Ut~-2 Subject: .. ~.-. Members· of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" .·portion of t~e agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council. must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is ·limited to three (3) minutes. ~------------------------ COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: J3~~ S:MI!!:!J Address: \1, lQO .tJ. {J.._-~ ;....._...... Cizy: ____ lt1B~~_G_?~----------------------------------------------- Subject: r2L .r--.MJJ'~A 'e ,. Members· of the public may address the Cizy Council during the "Comments by the Public" :portion of t~e agenda and during "Public Hearings". This. Request to Address the Cizy CounciL must be delivered to the Cicy Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: [ J/za b,ih ·t*tulZhall) Subject: Members· of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" .'portion of t~e agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council. must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is ·limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: Address: City: Subject: Comments From The Public Request to Address City Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" Portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please P?J_ } _ J , Name: .d}_V~ ~5 s Addres:;: 5_S:V?> z./)/-~;__Zbff: -jjf /L -_ , CITy: jfJVJJ ---;9.= ~-~5 ff 5?JYJ<P su~&vc;s~!iftf!!lh/ £b£$rrls~ ·~aA-~ ~bl ·· Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" .·portion of tfJe agenda and durtng "Public Hearings". This. Request to Address the City Council. must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is ·limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: Address: City: Subject: Comments From The Public Request to Address City Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" Portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. X Please Print Name: Address: City: Subject: 7u\lloo( Comments From The Public Request to Address City Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" Portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. X: Please Print Name: Address: City: Subject: Comments From The Public , Request to Address City Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" Portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name : Address : City: Subject: COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting . The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: Address: City: Subject: Comments From The Public Request to Address City Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" Portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City· Council Address: ~ 6000 f(f)/S 10 f. 1 f!J£) C.iR.,. City: P&LM8&~--~~~~-~~~~~--------------------­ Subject: t.H~~ rylembers· of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" ."portion of t~e agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council. must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting . The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. ------·-------------------- Comments From The Public Request to Address City Council Please Print -" Name: E~ ,S ~ ¥:vvr Address:Dov~~ 30(()5 ~ City: A evttGa1~ Subject: Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Pu b lic" Portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: Address :· /{)_0~,5 JQ la.nJ:....· City: Palm 'f!x:__ac!A ~ (jord em J F(_, Subject: · C h{Ll(k£ c5cft 0 c) / B3C/YP Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Heari.ngs". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of th~ meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Address=--------------------------------------------------------------- Su~ect=---------------------------------------------------------------- Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: \J'Oltvi~ S~8,> AddreS$: J 000 fr 05p£x i'-!-¥ QoJc 5' (J)LU-t City: r~vn Beach tbJd.PDS) FL 33410 Subject: :]JnQl S5UJ'\U . ~t£.¥: SchJ)OL ~-.. , Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during. "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: Subject: COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public He·arings". This Request to Address the GUy Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print /1 "A Name: 0ot1oAJ '-'k;t{Q;/ (" Address: !P;o ~ f{rf 2EL /fri~ City: 0 -<g -r-{._. Subject: ff~ L Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City-Council Members of the public may address the City ~ouncil during the "Comments by the PUblic" portion of the agenda and during "Public He·arings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: Subject: COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. April 28. 2013 To The City Council Members, Jon Ferreira 6064 Seminole Gardens Circle Palm Reach Gardens~ FL 33418 I am writing on behalf of all the families in my similar situation and in support of the Renaissance Charter School. I am a huge supporter of the town of Palm Beach Gardens. My family docs a tremendous amount ofbu.-;iness in the town and as a landscaper; a majority of my customers are Palm Beach Gardens residents. In addition. we support many of the local small businesses within the area. 1 also support public school education. I grew up in the public school system and had a favorable experience during my school years. However, in my immediate situation. my home falls bef\\.·ecn cities and where we are zoned for unacceptable public schools. Simply put.. my 4 digit extended zip code does not give me an , option. I live in Woodbine and was given a Palm Beach Gardens address and zip code. but, as a .. resident", I am considered Riv_icra Beach. I am half in one town and half in another but when it comes to schools J dun •t have a choice. Renaissance is our choice and I am hoping that you can understand our situation. Time is of the essence now and 1 hope you \\ill make the best choice possible for the upcoming school year. Our children arc depending on it. Received 5/14/2013 Page 1 of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 ~ Valerie Staggs <Valerie@rwads.com> April22 , 2013 8 :17AM To: <rpremuroso@pbgfl.com>, <mtinsley@pbgfl.com>, <jrusso@pbgfl .com>, <ejablin@pbgfl .com>, <dlevy@pbgfl.com>, <rferris@pbgfl.com> Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West Dear Palm Beach Gardens City Council Members: As a concerned parent and Palm Beach Gardens resident, I am writing to implore you to move forward on the approvals for the Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West. My son is currently at Allamanda Elementary School and although the school is A-rated, I feel it has not successfully served the needs of my son. As he moves into sixth grade this fall, I have similar concerns about the middle school for which we are zoned. The option to send him to a school like Renaissance Charter School right in the city in which I live will give me with the opportunity to further my son's education beyond what can currently be provided in the Palm Beach Gardens schools. Bringing Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West to Palm Beach Gardens will serve to strengthen the city's commitment to its residents by showing your dedication to providing the best educational options possible to your constituents. When I moved to Palm Beach Gardens from Boynton Beach two years ago, I chose this city because of what I saw as a progressive approach by its leadership to building a municipality that served the needs of its residents with the best resources possible. Please demonstrate this progressive mentality once more by welcoming Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West to Palm Beach Gardens. Thank you for commitment to education and to my family. Valerie Staggs Valerie Staggs 2600 Prosperity Oaks Court Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 President Ryan William's Agency P. 561.588.6336 F. 561.588.6223 www.rwads.com AAF Fourth District NSAC Chair www.4aaf.com Past President/Treasurer Palm Beach AD Fed www.palmbeachadfed.com Past President Executives' Association of the Palm Beaches www.palmbeachexecs.com Received 5/14/2013 Page2 of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to tbe City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 Patricia Weaver <PWeaver@pbcgov.org># May 1, 2013 1 :26 PM To : "scottlaurahanley@bellsouth.net" <SCOttlaurahanley@bellsouth.nel> Letter 1 Attac;:tvnent, 461 1<P Attached is the letter you requested. We have also emailed it to the City officials as well. Trish Weaver Administrative Assistant to Commissioner Hal Valeche Direct #561 355 4433 Office #561 355-2201 Fax # 561 355-6094 Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records . If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a publ ic records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead , contact th is office by phone or in writing. P.O. Boor. 1'189 'Welt Palm-. fl. 3)402·1989 1561)~2001 RIX: (561) ~­ www.pbqoY.com • --c-., _.,c-ty ta ' h~~~e n Halllllaled>e c....tJ' n I I I utua -- February 27, 2013 Honorable Bert Premuroso City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Dear Mayor Premuroso: As a Palm Beach Gardens resident, furmer City Council Member, Palm Beach County Commissioner and as a parent who appreciates the availability of choice in our children's' education. I wanted to express my support fur the proposed Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West. Charter Schools USA has established a great reputation within the State of Florida and is now expanding into several other states. They have a strong board of directors and a fiscally sound management plan. With Scripps and Max Planck growing, and other economic development projects in the works, the demand fur quality schools in the area is very high. I believe Renaissance will have a very positive impact on our community, and I am hopeful that you will act fil.vorably on their proposal and when the new school year begins, we will be able to Received 5/14/2013 welcome new students, parents and teachers to Palm Beach Gardens. Page3 of35 Sincerelv. I Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 Oflicial Electronic Lenerhead ~~Vtkck- County Commissioner District I Cc: City Council Members Received 5/14/2013 Page4of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 My !lil~ is--------and I am a Gardens Resident, I live at ________ _ I am VERY excited the City of Palm Beach Gardens is looking to the future of education and having Charter Schools enhance our community. With better schools com~s more business and higher property values and the incredible opportunity for our children. I am pleased to see forward thinkers on our Council and this Board and I look forward to the opening this year of Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West. Please help expedite the process so our kids can begin the school year in their new educational home. I urge you to VOTE \ YES today for Renaissance approval. Thank you. Received 5/14/2013 Page5of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 ~ I aJYJ (t5.vn fJg f/3 ~ sdz,.o(}/ Thu I[ J+¥1/1· f2 q4rV] Received 5/14/2013 Page6of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 Julianne Silva <jasdesigns@hotmail.com> March 17, 2013 10:13 PM To: <rpremuroso@pbgfl.colll>, <IT1tinsley@pbgfl.com>, <jrusso@pbgfl.com>, <ejablin@pbgfl.com>, <dlevy@pbgfl.colll>, <rferris@pbgfl.colll> Support Renaissance Charter @ Gardens West To the City Council Members of Palm Beach Gardens, I would like to begin by thanking each one of you for taking the time to read my email. I understand that your time is valuable to you, thus I appreciate your choice in hearing about why I support the Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West. My husband and I live in an area where we are zoned for an "F" rated elementary school that our daughter is to attend next fall. We have become extremely proactive in the search for better education for our children. Our research into other schools has spanned across the past year and a half and has been pure frustration. We seem to fall into a category where the options are very limited and close to none. Since the repeal of the "No Child Left Behind" act, our concerns have escalated. We have contacted most, if not all, the local elementary schools in the city only to find out that we do not qualify for placement, as we are outside the "zoned" limits. We have looked into the "Choice Programs" and have also learned that we do not qualify for placement through that program. Our daughter has not been diagnosed with an IEP or deemed "gifted" so we again do not qualify for placement through those standards. We have looked into several other charter schools only to find that they are not up to the quality standards that are represented by Renaissance Charter schools. In addition, the ones that are potential options require a substantial amount of drive time during the course of a day. The suggestion of a private school is not a fair one during a time when most families are trying to make ends meet and keep up to date with mortgages. We do not feel that we should have to settle for a school merely because there are no other options available for better education in our surrounding areas. We have spent much time learning about Renaissance Charter Schools. It is just what we have been looking for in a school and we were over joyed when we learned of the prospect of such a phenomenal school opening up in our community. It was a tremendous weight lifted off our shoulders and a relief to know that the city truly understands our concerns for the benefit of our children. Not only would this school have a direct positive impact on our children, but it would also be an asset to our community and for the potential of our future leaders. We are aware that our situation is not a unique one. We are also aware that many other states and cities are struggling with the same choices. Why not make this city an example of creating an even better educational system by expanding our options? Again, we thank you for your time and consideration. Julianne Silva Jon Ferreira Received 5/14/2013 Page7 of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 ~ ---------------------------- April28, 201J To The City Council Members, Julianne Silva 6064 Seminole Gardens Circle Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418 I have written a letter previously and would just like to show my support once again for Renaissance Charter School. Since my last letter, I have had the opportunity to visit the construction site of the new Palms West campus. The Garden's campus will be designed similar to the one at Palms West. l';ot only is the facility state of the art but it was impressive to see such professionalism and team dedication on everyone· s part for the ultimate goal of creating a school. This school has a proven track record ·in education, qualified teachers and staff: This sch<x>l would enhance the immediate sUITOundings in its Gardens location and it would also be an overall benefit to the entire to\\n as a whole. As a mother of a child just beginning her academic experience in the sch<x>l system, I am strongly encouraging the City Council to please not delay the opening of this school because of unresolved issues. This is my daughter's chance at a great education and I want to do it right from the start. T would encourage you to visit the construction sites also. Seeing is believing and it might help to answer any questions that you may have. Received 5/14/2013 PageS of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 ~ Genie Smith <gsmith@thegeneralledger.coi'Tl> May 13, 2013 1:58PM To: <rpremuroso@pbgfl.coi'Tl>, <mtinsley@pbgfl.com>, <jrusso@pbgfl.coi'Tl>, <ejablin@pbgfl.com>, <dlevy@pbgfl.coi'Tl>, <rferris@pbgfl.coi'Tl> Renassaince Charter School at Gardens West Good Afternoon Council of PBG, My name is Genie Miner Smith and I was born and raised in PBG ... Gardens Hospital once had a maternity ward ©. My family lives in PBG as do my parents and we are all business owners as well. My children attend The Benjamin School (my 5 year old is in pre-k and my one year old has not yet started of course) I believe Michael is your son Mr. Russo, he graduated from Benjamin a year after I did. I was excited to hear about the Renasssaince Charter School as a possible option. With the way the economy is heading I am concerned about being able to afford the Benjamin School in the future, as are a lot of other parents there and we need to know that there are options. I worry so much about everything since I have had children but I worry the most about where they will go to school as it is one of the most important and influential aspects of their lives. I have heard SO many bad things about the public school system. I really hope you all are able to help move along things so that the charter school may open in time. There is a need for more schools in the area ! ! Please know how much this Gardens lifelong resident would appreciate your helping Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West proceed with opening on time. Genie Miner Smith Received 5/14/2013 Page9 of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 ~--- April 29, 2013 RE: Renaissance Charter Schools To Whom It May Concern: This letter is to show my support for the town of Palm Beach Gardens and for Renaissance Charter School. · I have lived in Palm Beach Gardens for approximately 20 years and as a resident and local business owner, have been proud to call the town my home. The Gardens has so many unique features to offer residents and tourists that I feel, in addition to the great hospitality, dining, shopping and entertainment amenities, the Gardens is making progress in being able to boast about its educational system. I support all that Renaissance Charter School has to offer. From its superb location to its top of the line teaching and administrative staff and to all of those who fall within the scope of the school. I believe that Renaissance is what the town needs. As a single mother of a daughter who has since graduated college, I found the educational years to be extremely stressful. I had the ability to provide private education for my daughter, but that is not the case for all or the right choice for all. The standards for private schools is not up to par with what it used to be years ago. Let's encourage Renaissance for providing another opportunity in education for the families in and around Palm Beach Gardens. Sincerely, Michele Fanget Received 5/14/2013 Page 10 of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter,FL33478 ~ Terri P.olimeni 728 Maritime Way Palm Beach Gardens, Fl 33410 April29, 2013 RE: Renaissance Charter Schools To Whom It May Concern: My name is Terri Polimeni and I am writing in favor of the Renaissance Charter School in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. I reside in Palm Beach Gardens, as I have for many years. I, along with my ex- husband, each own our own businesses in Palm Beach Gardens. Our daughter is currently enrolled as a student at St. Marks School. We made the decision a few years ago to enroll her at a private institution because we were not satisfied with our local public school. Even though we are happy with our decision, the expense of a private school is substantial and does not give us a guarantee for our daughter's education. Not all families can consider private as an option. If we had the chance to consider a school such as Renaissance Charter School our decision for placement may have been different. I support Renaissance Charter School in the Gardens as another option for education and for the choice that they have now presented to numerous families. Education is the greatest thing we can provide our children and as parents we should have a choice. Palm Beach Gardens is extremely lucky to have been selected for such an amazing opportunity. Fondly, Terri Polimeni Received 5/14/2013 Page 11 of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jup;ter,FL33478 g_ ----------------·------------------------- Palm Beach Gardens City Council 10500 N Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Re: Proposed Charter School at 354 Hiatt Drive To Whom It May Concern, March 25111, 2013 My name is Jarrett Brock, I am the Director of leasing for Brock Development Corporation. We are a family owned developer/owner of several well known Commercial Properties throughout Palm Beach County. Our properties include Donald Ross Village and the Publlx Center at 4200 Northlake Boulevard known as Gardens Towne Square. I want to pledge my support for the charter school. The location is ideal being it neighbors the recreational park, and the charter school use is beneficial to the community. We need more school choices in Palm Beach County, and this particular Charter School Operator seems to have an impeccable record. To attract world class professionals for the world class institutions in Palm Beach Gardens and Jupiter, such as Scripps and Max Plank, we will need better education options for their children. Given the proximity to residents, and the park, I would hate to see this property be used in an industrial or other similar nuisance. Sincerely, ~ Jarrett Brock Brock Development Corp. 4650 Donald Ross Road, Ste 200 Palm Beach Gardens, Fl33418 I Received 5/14/2013 Page 12 of35 Roberta Pre .r.R.df_(~ Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 Tracy Carrano <tracycarrano@gmail.com> To: rferris@pbgfl .com Bee: scottlaurahanley@bellsouth.net Renaissance Charter School-Gardens West Dear Mr. Ferris , March 20, 2013 12:52 PM As a parent, a Palm Beach Gardens resident and as one of your constituents , I am writing this letter to you to ask your assistance with the plans of Charter Schools USA to open one of its newest schools on Hiatt Drive in Palm Beach Gardens-Renaissance Charter Schoo l at Gardens West . I am asking that you would facilitate the approval process for this school so that its opening will be on time and ready for students this fall. The children and the community in general would benefit greatly from a school with the kind of program Renaissance will be offering. These schools have a proven track record of success and present a unique and quality education for the K-Sth grade students in our area. I sincerely hope to have Renaissance as a school choice for my children in August . Thank you.· Tracy Carrano lf fo 2-3 5 ct, v c;...r e..-L a. le-e-P r. 1-g 6 . Pc 33VI() Received 5/14/2013 Page 13 of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter,FL33478 ~ V. Claire Wyant-Cortez <claire@hilleywyantlaw.com> To: Marcie Tinsley <mtinsley@pbgfl.com> Re: Support of Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West May 9, 2013 10:12 PM I live in North Palm Beach; however, I also own a house on Dogwood Avenue, Palm Beach Gardens, FL. I lived on Dogwood Avenue in Palm Beach Gardens for 10 years, from 1998 to 2008. Both my mom and my mother in law live in our house on Dogwood Avenue and we maintain strong ties to the Palm Beach Gardens community. Thank you for reaching out to me as an interested parent in favor of this new charter school in northern Palm Beach County! Regards, V . Claire Wyant-Cortez On May 9, 2013, at 9 :44PM, "Marcie Tinsley" <mtinsley@pbgfl.com> wrote: Thank you for your email. where exactly do you live? Best Regards , Marcie Tinsley Palm Beach Gardens City Councilmember From: V. Claire Wyant-Cortez [claire@hilleywyantlaw.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 20,201312:11 PM To: Robert Premuroso; Marcie Tinsley; Joseph Russo ; Eric Jablin; David Levy; Ron Ferris Cc: scottlaurahanley@bellsouth.net Subject: Support of Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West I am writing this email correspondence to you to ask for your support and assistance with Charter Schools USA newest school on Hiatt Drive in Palm Beach Gardens -Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West. As the parent of children in both elementary and middle school, with limited public funded school options in the northern Palm Beach County area, a state of the art school with quality teachers and a quality program for K-8 grades is something our area needs. I support this school and hope that all of you will as well! Regards , V. Claire Wyant-Cortez CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS E-MAIL DISCLAIMER: PLEASE NOTE: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from local officials regarding city business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your e-mail communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure. Received 5/14/2013 Page 14of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 May 1, 2013 Dear City Council Member, It has come to my understanding that you are holding a meeting tomorrow night to discuss the construction of Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West. I am a parent of two who has opted to have her children in private school up until now due to less than adequate public schools. As you can imagine, this has not been an inexpensive avenue. We are all very excited about the possibilities and educational program Renaissance has to offer. While I am no longer a resident of Palm Beach Gardens, three of my sons' grandparents are, and we all hope that you will do whatever is necessary to make sure this facility is granted the necessary permits for construction to begin and the school to open on time. Thank you in advance for your attention to this very important community matter. Sincerely, Nicole McBride Received 5/14/2013 Page 15of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter,FL33478 ~ Nicole M. <mcbridenik@yahoo.com> March 19, 2013 6:16PM To: "rpremuroso@pbgfl.com" <rpremuroso@pbgfl.com>, "mtinsley@pbgfl.com" <mtinsley@pbgfl.com>, "ejablin@pbgfl.com" <ejablin@pbgfl.com>, "jrusso@pbgfl.com" <jrusso@pbgfl.corn>, "dlevy@pbgfl.com" <dlevy@pbgfl.com>, "rferris@pbgfl.com" <rferris@pbgfl.com> Reply-To: "Nicole M." <mcbridenik@yahoo.com> Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West March 19, 2013 Dear City Council Member, As a parent of current fifth and third grade boys, I am thrilled with the opening of Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West. Up until now, my sons have attended private school because of the poor public schools that are available in the county. My oldest is off to middle school next year and I find myself fretting over the decision of where to send him. I do not hear good things about local public middle schools and the other charter schools leave much to be desired in regards to location and facilities. You can imagine my excitement when I heard of this new charter school opening just down the street from me! The possibility of my child receiving a good education in a safe and nurturing environment-AND FINALLY TUITION FREE-is fantastic and long overdue! Not only is Renaissance able to offer experience in charter-school education, but in a state-of-the-art facility that students can feel comfortable in for years to come. As you can imagine, students beginning at a new school, especially middle school, are sure to feel more than a little anxious about the change. To help alleviate this anxiety, I am hoping that the building will be ready and my son's first weeks at Renaissance can be relaxed and settling. No one (teachers, parents, students or administrators) wants to deal with the stresses of a new school not being ready for occupancy at the start of the new year. I am confident that as a City Council Member you will do everything in your power to help make Renaissance a success on the scheduled opening day of the 2013-2014 school year. Thank you in advance for your attention to this very important community matter. Sincerely, Nicole McBride Received 5/14/2013 Page 16of3S Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 U---- _>..:· Palm Beach Gardens City Council 10500 N Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Re: Proposed Charter School at 354 Hiatt Drive To Whom It May Concern, January 29th, 2013 ' My name is Ashlee Crunk, I am a Undergraduate Biology Student at Florida Atlantic University, and a Palm Beach County Resident. I wanted to pledge my support for the proposed charter . . . -. -. . -.. .. -. Received 5/14/2013 Page 17 of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 school in Palm Beach Gardens. Many ot tne unaergraauates In tne !>C1ence programs at t-AU would be interested in continuing their education in Palm Beach County, unfortunatelya lack of school options for our children, and a lack of Science related jobs has led myself and fellow students to look outside of Palm Beach County and Florida for continuing education/career opportunities for ourselves, and educational opportunities for our children. More school options are badly needed by current Palm Beach County residents as well as attracting new residents. Sincerely, Ashlee Crunk 14U Kltely Avenue Boynton Beach, FL 33436 Palm Beach Gardens City Council 10500 N Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Re: Proposed Charter School at 354 Hiatt Drive To Whom It May Concern, May 3rd, 2013 My name is Benjamin Bruner, I recently purchased a home in Palm Beach Gardens. 1 am 26 years old, and work in Real Estate. I grew up in Palm Beach County, and my father Is the Vice Presidents of Philanthropy for Scripps Research Institute. The lack of decent education options in Palm Beach County is alarming, if you tour Scripps or Max Plank you will notice that barely any of the high level researchers and staff are native Floridians. (My father included.) We were forced to move to Boca instead of R · ed 511412013 Page 18 of 35 somewhere in North Palm Beach County doser to Scripps beca use of the lack of education eceav options. I can tell you first hand, that world class scientists have extremely rigorous standards for their children's education, and the current school choices In Palm Beach County makes It Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. · ···-·--··· Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 g___ extremely ditticult to attract tne cauoer ot researchers needed by these institutions. From a Real Estate perspective, there have been numerous empirical studies that prove a positive correlation between quality schools and rising real estate values. Besides this, the alternative uses for the site could potentially negatively affect both neighboring commercial and residential property values. Noise, traffic from 53' tractor trailers, not to mention potential environmental contamination(s) are major concerns. In addition, the alternative industrial uses and related tractor trailer traffic mixes terribly with the Montessori preschool and public park and is a traffic fatality waiting to happen. Thank you for taking the time to review this letter, and I hope you will pledge your support for the Hiatt Drive Charter School. Si n ~~ Benjamin Bnlner 561-573·7137 BnlnerBenjamin@lgmail.com Palm Beach Gardens City Council 10500 N Military TraH Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Re: Proposed Charter School at 354 Hiatt Drive To Whom It May Concern, April29111, 2013 My name is Benjamin Hartman, and I am a Luxury Residential Real Estate Agent in North Palm Beach County. One of the first questions Buyers and Prospective Tenants ask me is about the quality of schools in the Palm Beach Gardens area. Numerous dients have shied away from the area due to the lack of quality public schools, and the waiting lists/high prices of private schools. There are numerous studies that show quality schools positively affect real estate values . Furthermore, the use of this location as a school versus one of the potential industrial uses will be a positive for the community. The traffic/noise/potential environmental issues from an industrial use could have a very serious negative Impact on local residential real estate values. Received 5/14/2013 Page 19of35 C>int",.r..tv Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 _,,_ ..... _.,, ~~#h Benjamin Hartman Broker Associate Barrett Welles Property Group (310)-850-2386 bhartmanflbarrettwelles.com Fra.:.ichael falk I Colpany LLC 561<4789059 Palm 8eiiCII Ganfens City Council 10500 N Military Tnl Palm Beach Gardens. FL 33410 To Whom It May Concern, 05/03/2013 17 :15 1006 p. 001/001 May 3rd, 2013 My name Is DanieHe ""-e. lam 22 years old, rn.rrled with two YQUill children,. and li¥e in Palm Beach County. My husband and I currently live in loca, but have been Jookln&to purthase Oil' first home. We reilly II Iced Palm Beach Gardens, but due1D the A!IHit.tfan of Palm leach Gardens pubic schoo" 1!1'1 hweshled _.,from Palm Beach G;irdens. SChools Ike this one. and the Franklin School wiD make Palm Beach Gardens more attractive 10 ¥0UIIB famUies lllce mine Sincerely, ~~ DanieDe loose A COl_,.. Palm 8uc:h Courltr Relldent Received S/14/2013 Page20of3S Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 V-- ----·-··-·--·-----·----··----------------------, Palm Beach Gardens City Council 10500 N Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Re: Proposed Olarter School at 354 Hiatt Drive To Whom It May Concern, January 29111, 2013 My name is Gino Rivera, I am a 2S year old young professional in Palm Beach County. I am married with two young children, and in the process of purchasing our first home. During our search for a house, we were forced to stay away from Palm Beach Gardens due to the lack of school options. That being said, I wanted to pledge my support for the proposed charter school in Palm Beach Gar:dens. We do not want to leave Palm Beach County, but due to the lack of public schools, and the lack of space at the established private schools. we might have to leave Palm Beach County altogether. I hope you will vote In support of the Hiatt Drive Charter School. Gino Rivera 561-929-5431 rgcgino@lgmail.com ::·· Received 5/14/2013 Page21 of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 Palm Beach Gardens City Council 10500 N Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Re: Proposed Charter SdMKII at 354 Hiatt Drive To Whom It May Concern, May 3rd, 2013 My name is Ruben Lopez, I am a Palm Beach County Resident, with three children and one grandchild. By profession, I am a residential real estate agent. As both a father and as a R~al Estate Professional, I implore you to approve the charter school at 354 Hiatt Drive. I have seen the lack of quality schools through my own parenting, as well as professionally. Our community cannot grow without better and more school options. Besides the need for more school options, the proposed aesthetically ple_asing conversion of 354 Hiatt Drive to a charter school with a bridge connecting to the park, will increase local real estate values more than the permitted industrial uses will Sincerely, Ruben Lopez Highlight Realty Rubenl..opez54@Yahoo.com Received 5/14/2013 Page22 of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to tbe City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 ------------------- Palm Beach Gardens Plannlna & Zonlnc 10500 N Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Re: Proposed Charter School at 354 Hiatt Drive To Whom It May Concern, January 19111, 2013 My name is Sean Moody and I am a residential real estate agent specializing in luxury properties in Palm Beach Gardens. I wanted to pledge my support for the charter school. We need more school choices in Palm Beach County, and the charter school operator seems to have an Impeccable record. To attract world class professionals for the world dass institutions popping up in Palm Beach Gardens and Jupiter we will need better education options. Not to mention for those already living in Palm Beach County. Furthermore, from my understanding of the case studies done on the subject of charter schoors effects on real estate values are extremely favorable in approving the school. Warm regards, Sean Moody Realty Associates 4650 Donald Ross Road, Ste.220 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418 Received 5/14/2013 Page23 of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 betsylds@gmail.com March 18, 2013 8:41 PM To: "rpremuroso@pbgfl.com" <rpremuroso@pbgfl.com> Cc: "scottlaurahanley@bellsouth.net" <scottlaurahanley@bellsouth.net>, "Dan (Gina) Shalloway" <dan.shalloway@svn .com>, Betsy Savery <betsylds@gmail.com> Renaissance at Gardens West 3/18/13 Mr. Premuroso, I am both a parent and an educator who has enrolled my two sons for the new charter school that will be opened by Charter Schools USA in August. I am excited for my children, and for the other children in the area, to take advantage of the fine educational program , state of the art facilities, and excellent teaching staff this coming school year. The 2013-2014 school year brings great excitement to Palm Beach Gardens and the surrounding communities as we welcome the members of the Renaissance team and invite each to educate and excite our youth, the future of our nation, with a proven reputation of excellence . Please do all that is necessary, and quickly, to ensure that this wonderful new school will open its doors in August. I had the pleasure of attending the impressive ribbon cutting ceremony and festivities at the West Palm Beach location on Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard at the beginning of this school year. I left that event envious of the City of West Palm Beach for having such a school and of the many students who were able to attend . I was also encouraged that a Renaissance school would soon be created in the north end of the county. Fortunately for my children, the time has come. I couldn't be happier that my children will have the opportunity to attend, participate, and become part of the Charter Schools USA family of Renaissance schools. Please see that the green light is given, that the ground is broken, and that the doors are opened to enable this wonderful, tree education for our children in August. I saw what Charter Schools USA was able to accomplish in just a few short weeks to open the West Palm Beach campus so quickly, and I am confident that it can , and will , be done again in Palm Beach Gardens. Thank you for your assistance and recognition that creating this fine educational environment for our children is a wonderful decision. Sincerely, Betsy Lehman Savery MA SentfrommyiPhone Received 5/14/2013 Page24of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 Betsy Norris <baby-girl-925@hotmail.com> To: rferris@pbgfl.com Gardens West Charter School Ron, March 18, 2013 9:27PM I wanted to take a moment to let you know that I am excited and looking forward to the Renaissance Gardens west charter school. I want and need this school in my area. I wanted to thank you and the rest of the Gardens Council for giving me a choice in my daughters education . Please move quickly on the approvals of the paperwork so my child, Madison, can start school in August at this school. Thanks again!! Sylvia Norris President of Talent Acquisition Kennedy Jackson Group 561-889-2798 office KennedyJacksonGroup@gmail.com Sent from my iPhone Received 5/14/2013 Page 25 of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 David Johnson <d.a .johnson82@gmail.com> March 20, 2013 10:19 AM To : Bpremuroso@pbgfl.com, Mtinsley@pbgfl.com, Jrusso@pbgfl.com, Ejablin@pbgfl.com, Dlevy@pbgfl.com, rterris@pbgfl.com Cc: scottlaurahanley@bellsouth.net Renaissance at Gardens West Good Morning Gardens Council and Manager, I am excited to write this letter to you to request your assistance with Charter Schools USA newest school on Hiatt Drive in Palm Beach Gardens -Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West. Please do all that is necessary to ensure that this wonderful school, with it's proven track record of success behind it, be ready and able to open it's doors in August, 2013. Charter Schools USA has a reputation as being a state of the art school program, with quality teachers and a quality program which will be K-8 grades is just what our area needs! As parents of a child going into 3rd grade this upcoming year, we sincerely hope to have Renaissance at Gardens West as a choice for our ch ild. We support this school strongly. My wife Judy and I, look forward to placing our trust and confidence into the mentoring education of our daughter, Leila F. Johnson, to Gardens West. Thank you for your support and consideration, David & Judy Johnson David.Johnson@comcast.net Judy. Estacio .Johnson @comcast.net 3 7 5" 0 c o.J-"-l L cl\-6-. R ~ ?'B b .. F L 33 f L O Received S/14/2013 Page26of3S Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to tbe City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 Sara Garofalo <Salnsara@comcast.nel> March 19, 2013 2:02PM To: jrusso@pbgfl .com, rpremuroso@pbgfl .com, mtinsley@pbgfl.com, ejablin@pbgfl.com, dlevy@pbgfl.com, rferris@pbgfl.com Cc: salnsara@comcast.net Renaissance Charter School Dear Sirs, We are writing this letter to you to ask for your assistance in helping Charter Schools USA open their newest school on Hiatt Drive in Palm Beach Gardens -Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West. Please do all that is necessary to ensure that this wonderful school, with it's proven track record of success behind it, will be ready and able to open it's doors in August, 2013. A state of the art school, with quality teachers and a quality program which plans to go through 8th grade is just what our area needs. As the parents of a child going into middle school this year, we sincerely hope to have Renaissance as a choice for our daughter to begin middle school this coming August. Thank you in advance, Sara and Salvatore Garofalo Palm Beach Gardens -Residents and Small Business Owners w~~e.fZet ~ \:>r />L 33Y /0 Received 5/14/2013 Page27 of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, JupHer, FL 33478 ~ Debimcfarland <deb imcfarland@ aol.com> March 20,2013 9:34PM To: rpremuroso@pbgfl.com , mtinsley@pbgfl.com, jrusso@pbgfl.com, ejablin@pbgfl.com, dlevy@pbgfl.com, rferris@pbgfl.com Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West Dear Gardens Council , Wei are excited to write this letter on behalf of the Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West. This is the newest school of Charter Schools USA which is slated to be housed on Hiatt Drive in Palm Beach Gardens . Our request is that you do all that is necessary to ensure that th is wonderful school, with ifs proven track record of success behind it, be ready and able to open ifs doors in August, 2013 . A state of the art school, with quality teachers and a quality program which wiH be K-8 grades is just what our area needs. As the parents of a child going into 3rd grade this year, we sincerely hope to have Renaissance as a choice for our son, Jackson. We strongly support this school without hesitation. Sincerely, Dr. and Mrs. Scott McFarland 561-601-6602 Debimcfarland debimcfarland @aol.com 5" ~~'i (.J~;r kc .. i<<J \<.-~. ~0 (, '{:L 33Y/<{ I Received S/14/2013 Page28 of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 ---------------------- Uza Merkman <red6801 @gmail.com:> April20, 2013 12:45 PM To: rpremuroso@pbgfl.com, mtinsley@pbgfl .com, jrusso@pbgfl.com, ejablin@pbgfl.com, dlevy@pbgfl.com, rferris@pbgfl.com Bee : scottlaurahanley@bellsouth.net Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West Dear Sir !Madam, I live in Palm Beach Gardens and I have a 5 year old and she loves to learn will be starting school in August at the Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West, I am was so excited when I found out there was a new Renaissance Charter School opening in . Palm Beach Gardens. I want to express that my feelings towards the opening and completion of the school by the start of the school year August 2013, this school will provide my child with the education that she will need to have a successful and prosperous future. Best Regards. Liza Merkman c:-c 3Ji/b Received 5/14/2013 Page29of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter,FL33478 ~ Jennifer Rollins <jennifer.rollins@palmbeachschools .org> March 20,2013 9:52AM To: scottlaurahanley@bellsouth .net, rpremuroso@pbgfl.com, mtinsley@pbgfl.com, jrusso@pbgfl.com, ejablin@pbgfl .com, dlevy@pbgfl.com, rferris@pbgfl.com Opening of Renaissance in Gardens I am writing this letter to you to ask for your assistance with Charter Schools USA newest school on Hiatt Drive in Palm Beach Gardens -Renaissance Charter School at Gardens West . Please do all that is necessary to ensure that this wonde rf ul school , with it's proven track record of success behind it, be ready and able to open it's doors in August, 2013. A state of the art school, with quality teachers and a quality program which will be K-8 grades is just what the area needs. As the parent of a child going into Kindergarten this year, I sincerely hope to have Renaissance as a choice for my son to begin Kindergarten this coming August. I support this school strongly. Having a great school with great educators as the foundation of the starting of my son's education means everything to me. Thanks, Jennifer Rollins m he Latest School District News : Have an enjoyable and restful Spring Break! Disclaimer: Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing . Received 5/14/2013 Page30of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 ~ April 29, 2013 Marilyn Lewis 9376 Silent Oak Circle Wellington, FL 3341 1 ATfENTION: Palm Beach Gardens City Council Members TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I am writing you today, as I have been told of possible delays in the opening of the Renaissance School in the Gardens. 1 am currently in the process of purchasing a large apartment complex in the Palm Beach Gardens area, and being in this business for over 25 years I know the most important item on every renters mind is having a good school in the area. So as an apartment building owner this is of great concern to me, as we take all of this into account before purchasing our properties. I feel it would be a great dissatisfaction to the entire community if the Renaissance School did not open on time and any concerns should be resolved quickly, as this will truly benefit all in the area and it would ease my mine~, as we will be soon joining this great city. We look forward to the opening of this great school, for our family and all of our future tenants' children. Thank you for your time~ Marilyn Lewis Received 5/14/2013 Page31 of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Juplte•, FL 33478 cy___ -------------------------·-----··----- May 1, 201 3 To Whom It May Concern; I am writing to you today because I am a concerned grandparent who is interested in quality education for today's children. My granddaughter has been accepted to Renaissance Charter School in Palm Beach Gardens. The whole family is really excited because for two years we have been struggling as to where my granddaughter would attend kindergarten. They live on the line of Palm Beach Gardens and Riviera Beach; as you are aware the puplic school that she would be required to attend is an F rated school. I visit Palm Beach Gardens 3 to 4 times a year and have several friends that live there. We have discussed the schools that are available to the children in that area many times and we all feel that an F rated school is not an option. We also feel that this new school would be a wonderful addition to the residents of Palm B~ach Gardens and the surrounding areas. The children would be afforded a tremendous opportunity to receive such quality education. I live in Cape Cod Massachusetts and have many friends whose children attended the Sturgis Charter School. As you may be aware, this school was rated number three in the country because of the quality education provided there. I believe the same type of Received 5/14/2013 Page32 of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL33478 4------ • --------------- quality education would be received at Renaissance as they have reputable track record. My reason for writing at this time is in hope that there would not be any fu rther delay in opening this school on time in August. Palm Bea ch Gardens is very fortunate to have such a wonderful school in their community. Sincerely, Carolyn Silva Received 5/14/2013 Page33 of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478 ~ ~---------~---------BruneriPresser 561..S88-9562 Roberta Presser 2Sl9 NW 40* Street Boca Raton. FL 33434-4448 (S61)988-9S62 (home); (561)926-1585 (cell) robertapresser@gmai1.com May 3,2013 Palm Beach City Council 1 0500 North Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 3341 0 RE: Proposed Charter Schools USA at 354 Hiatt Drive To Whom It May Concern: p.1 1 am writing in support of the establishment of a new charter school in Palm Beach Gardens. When I moved here from New York in 1999 for my husband's new job in West Palm Beach, I searched fur a school for my twelve-year-old son before even thinking about where to live. As a teacher and cuniculum developer for the New York City Board of Education, I was well aware of the cruc:ia1 influence the learning environment has on the intellectual and emotional development of our children. My search yielded nothing in Palm Beach County. The few private schools already had full enrollment in my son's grade. and the public schools bad already filled their magnet programs, leaving only very large classes, some of them with numbers greater than that contractually allov..'ed in New Yorlc. Obviously, there was a need for educational reform, some of which has since been addressed by mandating class size limits, which bas since come under criticism. The need for innovative educational rcfo.nn, along with the hiring of qualified tcachas, 1m1ains.. I believe Charter Schools USA addresses this need. The concept of individual portfolios v."BS proven to be an effective measure of student achievement at The International High School at La Guardia Community CoUege, where I counseled students on preparing their graduation portfolios. When I moved to Palm Beach County, I participated in a \\'Orkshop at the Weiss School on students' individual learning styles, focusing on how best to address the needs of each student. 1be portfolio method, an integral port of the educational philosophy of the ohartcr school, effectively addresses this need. Received 5/14/2013 Page34of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter,FL33478 ~ ------------------Bruner/Presser 561-988-9562 p.2 Page2 Charier Schools USA will enhance 1he education of all Palm Beach County students. Its location ensures that the student body wi11 include children whose parents may be scientists with Scripps Florida, the Max Planck Institute, or the F AU campuses nearby, allowing the school to formulate programs utilizing loc:al academic enrichment programs and leading the way for WI the schools in Palm Beach County. It will be a '\\.in-win situation for all of us in the region. Very truly yours, 4~ y /--7'/-£~~---;.....,-._ Received 5/14/2013 Page35of35 Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board Mtg. Provided to the City Clerk's Office by: Laura Hanley, 16338 Alexander Run, Jupiter, FL 33478