Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda P&Z 071007Please Print Name: L COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council C ko-PZ Address: -2 / . !�r H U .DS D I"y B 4 � D City: -P 5 G Subject: C AR D EtV 5 -f �- I4- � �- f U DA- - O 7 -� Q� - OOGIO67 Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings ". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print �{ Name: c-,$ v 2 v Address: �(� tJ�� SGC�� # ?k City: F/5 Subject: l UD Oc 1 -0-�> Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings ". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: l' c k.D O K) C Nr ftT L( K. Address: 7(-5 N y 0 S ort-) 5 14 DR— city: P 5G 1 Subject: ?U o - 6 q -0 3 L e66ey s A-TT 7% 6#eLw1as Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings ". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. Please Print Name: COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council -1;J19 h Address: ll x to City: Subject 4( �. 6— ��'�r��� -� �D�� %cr��'t,� ✓ter .� c'A1""[ %c ff (�'� ✓ l (�.� < <:..r�t S" (�Ir � G 44 �- �-r ��' P e�'�t�- �l f t lr't ' � ';- , ( " Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings ". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. t JUCY 10, 2007 Randooh Hansen Dennis Solomon Craig Xunkle Michael Panczak Douglas Pennell Barry Present ,Jonathan D. Rubins ,Joy Hecht (is' .Alt.) .Amir Xanel (2"'' Alt.) IL Agh CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS 10500 N. MILITARY TRAIL • PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410 -4698 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 10, 2007 TO: Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board Members FROM: Growth Management Department SUBJECT: Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board Meeting Tuesday, July 10, 2007 - 6:30 P.M. Enclosed is the agenda containing the items to be presented on Tuesday, July 10, 2007. This meeting will be held in the Council Chambers, Palm Beach Gardens Municipal Building, 10500 North Military Trail, beginning at 6:30 p.m. Enclosed with this memorandum are the following items: • 1. An agenda for the meeting; and 2. A compact disc containing PowerPoint presentations 3. A Growth Management Department staff report for the items to be heard. As always, the respective Project Managers' telephone numbers and e-mail addresses have been provided in case you have any questions or require additional information on any petition. This will help us offer better staff support in the review of these applications. Nina Sorenson, Administrative Specialist I1, will call to confirm your attendance. Growth Management Administrator CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM TO: Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Members DATE: July 3, 2007 FROM: Richard Marrero, Planner W1 SUBJECT: Gardens Plaza PUD Amendment CC: Brad Wiseman, Planning Manager Kara Irwin, Growth Management Administrator Petition No: PUDA- 07- 06- 000007 Please be advised that there is no staff report associated with the Gardens Plaza Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment at this time. However, the Gardens Plaza site plan petition will be presented by the applicant at a workshop during the July 10, 2007, PZAB meeting (please see attached plans). This PUD request is for a 4.5 -acre parcel located at the southeast corner of PGA Boulevard and Fairchild Gardens Avenue. Staff will be present to answer any questions that the PZAB may have. Please contact Richard Marrero, Planner, at 799 -4219 if you have any questions or require additional information. CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD • Agenda Cover Memorandum • Date Prepared: July 3, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition CUMJ 07- 05- 000009 SUBJECT /AGENDA ITEM Petition CUMJ 07 -05- 000009: Redevelopment of Allamanda Elementary School Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council: A request by the School District of Palm Beach County for a Major Conditional Use Overlay to allow the demolition of the existing elementary school and the construction of a new single story educational facility, on the 14.9 -acre Allamanda Elementary School site, generally located at the southwest comer of the intersection of Allamanda Lane and Nogal Circle. [X] Recommendation to APPROVE. [ J Recommendation to DENY Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Finance: PZAB Action: Growth Finance [ ] Approved City Attorney Management: Administrator: [ ] App. w/ conditions Christine P. Tatum Project Pro J ter- Manager— N/A [ ] Denied Allan Owens [ ]Rec. approval Todd Miller, AICP [ ] Rec. app. w/ coeds. [X] Quasi— Development r) ``--�� Building [ ] Rec. Denial Compliance Judicial Accountant: [ ]Continued Bahareh Keshavarz- Wolfs, [ ] Legislative By N/A to: AICP [X] Public Hearing K. Labossiere Advertised: Attachments: Fees Paid: [N /A] Growth Manag t Date: 6/29/07 Date: A. Conditional Use Administrator Paper: Palm Beach Criteria Analysis Kara Irwin, AI P Post B. Section 1013.33 (F.S.) C. Site Plan Approved By: City Manager [X] Required Budget Acct. #: D. Landscape Plan [] Not Required N/A E. Elevations Ronald M. Ferris Affected Parties: [X] Notified [ ] Not Required Date Prepared: July 3, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition CUMJ 07 -05- 000009 0 BACKGROUND In 1963, the MacArthur Foundation dedicated the subject property to the Board of Public Instruction of Palm Beach County, which constructed the existing elementary school in 1964. The existing school is 70,323 sf in size (excluding corridors), and has a current enrollment of 695 students. The School District of Palm Beach County (the "District ") is proposing to demolish the existing elementary school and construct a new education facility consisting of 4 interconnected buildings totaling 122,497 square feet, which will serve as the new Allamanda Elementary School. The proposed school will have a program capacity (student stations) of 745. The property is 14.9 acres in size, and is located at the southwest corner of Allamanda Lane and Nogal Circle. LAND USE AND ZONING The subject site has a Public (P) future land -use designation and a zoning designation of Public or Institutional (PI). 2005 FLORIDA STATUTES In accordance with Section 1013.33, Florida Statutes (F.S.), entitled Coordination of planning (Educational facilities) with local governing bodies (attached), the District is required to request a determination from the City that a site plan for a proposed educational facility is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City shall determine, in writing within 45 days after receiving the .necessary. information and the school board's request for a determination, whether the proposed educational facility is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and consistent with local land development regulations. If the determination is affirmative, school construction may commence and further City approvals are not required, except as provided in Section 1013.33, F.S. Failure of the City to make a determination in writing within 90 days after the District's request for a determination of consistency shall be considered an approval of the District's application. Further, the City may not deny the site application based on adequacy of the site plan as it relates solely to the needs of the school. If the site is consistent with the comprehensive plan's land use policies and categories in which public schools are identified as allowable uses, the City may not deny the application. The City may only consider the site plan and its adequacy as it relates to environmental concerns, health, safety and welfare, and effects on adjacent property. Standards and conditions may not be imposed which conflict with those established in Section 1013, F.S., or the Florida Building Code, unless mutually agreed and consistent with the interlocal agreement required by Section 1013.33, F.S. CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Future Land Use Element The following are policies set forth in the Future Land Use element of the City's Comprehensive Plan relating to school facilities with which the proposed site plan for the School is consistent: • Policy 1.1.1.7.: The City shall ensure the availability for suitable land for public and institutional uses necessary to support development by: 2 • (Policy 1.1.1.7. continued) Date Prepared: July 3, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition CUMJ o7- o5- 000009 2. Allowing public /institutional uses in certain land -use categories subject to limitations and locational criteria as identified in this Plan. Such locational criteria shall include the following standards: (c) Public /Institutional Uses shall be limited in intensity to maximum lot coverage of 40% of the site and a maximum building height of 50 feet. Staff Comments: The proposed School has maximum lot coverage of 19.5% of the site and a maximum building height of 34' — 6" to the tallest point. (d) Schools shall be considered as compatible and allowable in areas designated with any residential land -use category (RR20, RR10, RVL, RL, RM, RH). Further, schools shall be considered public /institutional uses and be allowable within areas designated Industrial (IND) and Public (P) on the Future Land Use Map. Staff Comments: The subject site has a Public (P) future land -use designation. • (e) Public /Institutional Uses shall be buffered from adjacent land uses and shall be set back from adjacent roadways. Buffering for noise, odors, glare and lights shall be provided. Setbacks shall be a minimum of 25 feet in the front, 15 feet in the sides and rear and buffers shall be a minimum of 5 feet. Buffers and setbacks may be increased depending on the characteristics of the proposed public /institutional use. Stadiums, outdoor recreational facilities and similar support facilities shall be located and buffered on the proposed site to minimize impacts on adjacent properties. Staff Comments: The proposed site plan incorporates a 487' front setback adjacent to Allamanda Lane, a 25' side setback from the western property line, a 42' rear setback from the southern property line, and a 93' side setback from the eastern property line. The applicant has met the plan requirements by designing an approximately 380' deep conservation area along the northern property line, a 15' landscape buffer along the east property line, a 25' landscape buffer along the southern property line, and a 8' landscape buffer along the western property line. Public School Facilities Element The following are policies set forth in the City's Public School Facilities element of the Comprehensive Plan relating to the siting and development review process for public school facilities, with which the proposed site plan for the School is consistent: Objective l 1.1.4.: To establish a process of coordination and collaboration between the County, local •governments, and the School District in the planning and siting of public school facilities in coordination with planned infrastructure and public facilities. Date Prepared: July 3, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition CUMJ 07 -05- 000009 •Policy 11.1.4.1: The City of Palm Beach Gardens shall coordinate and provide for expedited review of development proposals with the School District during the development review process to ensure integration of public school facilities with surrounding land uses and the compatibility of uses with schools. Staff Comments: Staff has made every attempt to expeditiously review the District's development proposal in accordance with the City's LDRs to ensure the integration of the School facility with surrounding land uses. Policy 11.1.4.2: There shall be no significant environmental conditions and significant historical resources on a proposed site that cannot be mitigated or otherwise preclude development of the site for a public educational facility. Staff Comments: Staff has determined that the proposed site plan poses no threats to the environmental resources on site. No historical resources exist on site. Policy 11.1.4.3: The proposed site shall be suitable or adaptable for development in accordance with applicable water management standards, and shall not be in conflict with the adopted or officially accepted plans of the South Florida Water Management District, or any applicable Stormwater Utility or Drainage District. Staff Comments: The District has indicated that all necessary development permits have already been • acquired. CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Section 78 -159 of the City's LDRs, entitled Permitted uses, conditional, and prohibited uses, requires "Schools, Public and Private," to be granted conditional use approval by the City Council. Demonstration of the project's compliance with the City's conditional use criteria established in Section 78 -52 is attached hereto. PROJECT DETAILS Overview The District is proposing a 122,496 square -foot elementary school on the existing 14.9 -acre Allamanda Elementary School site. The school consists of four (4) interconnected buildings. In addition, the site plan incorporates sports fields for basketball, soccer, and baseball, 3 playgrounds, and a conservation area containing an existing retention pond. Traffic Concurrence The new school design will increase capacity at the school from 695 students to 745 students in the program capacity (student stations), and 964 students in the core facilities (future expansion). The applicant has provided a Traffic Concurrency Impact Analysis, and the City's Traffic Consultant has performed a coordinated review with the Palm Beach County Traffic Division. The City's Traffic •Consultant has indicated they will be issuing concurrency approval conditioned upon the installation of a westbound turn lane on Allamanda Lane. Therefore, staff has provided a condition of approval providing that, if required by the County, the Applicant shall construct a westbound, left turn lane into F1 Date Prepared: July 3, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition CUMJ 07 -05- 000009 the school site at the central main entrance prior to the opening of school. Access and Traffic Circulation Currently, vehicular access is provided to the elementary school via a driveway connection off of Allamanda Lane along the west property line, and bus traffic is provided via Nogal Circle on the east side of the property. The applicant is proposing to redesign the site to provide parent drop off and visitor access via a new connection from Nogal Circle to a new "eastern" parking lot and drop off loop on the site. In addition, the applicant is providing another new connection between the eastern parking lot and Allamanda Lane. Lastly, the applicant is proposing to maintain the existing connection from Allamanda Lane along the western side of the property, which will serve as a bus drop off loop, and access to a "western" parking lot for visitors and staff. City staff have encouraged the applicant to look at all means available to provide as much stacking on site, as is possible. In furtherance thereof, staff has requested the applicant provide an Operational Analysis of the traffic flows. In addition to the subject petition, the applicant has applied for a right -of -way permit for constructing a driveway connection from Nogal Circle to the eastern parking lot, and for a driveway connection from the eastern parking lot to Allamanda Lane. Parking Parking requirements for schools are established by Chapter 423 of the Florida Building Code. Specifically, the proposed elementary school is required to provide 140 parking spaces, and has provided a total of 148 spaces. (See table below.) Type of Parking Required Provided Faculty & Staff 120 128 Service Staff 10 10 Visitors 1 per 100 940 Core STU ETA 10 10 Total 140 148 Landscaping The School District is limited in the amount of landscaping they can provide by State mandated requirements for Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CEPTD). Therefore, the District has worked with the City Forester in order to come up with a landscape plan that addresses the City's major concerns and maintains the safety standards and budgetary constraints of the District. Common species proposed on the landscape plan include Live Oak, Cabbage Palm, Foxtail Palms, Buttonwoods, etc. Lighting The District will be providing lighting around each building and the parking lots. The District has provided a photometrics plan which indicates the lighting will meet Palm Beach County lighting requirements, which are compatible with the City's lighting regulations. •Architecture The District is proposing a style of architecture which is Modern in flavor, and is consistent with other schools within the City. The construction type is "tilt -up ", and the building includes such features as 61 Date Prepared: July 3, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition CUMJ o7- o5- 000009 •metal shading, smooth and dark finish combinations, and aluminum detailing. In addition, the applicant has provided additional articulation through the use of color, integrated rain gutters, and a flat roof for the building. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE The City's Development Review Committee performed a review of the project and provided comments and conditions of approval. PUBLIC NOTICE In accordance with Section 78 -54 of the City's Land Development Regulations, entitled Public Notice, the City sent notice of this public hearing via US mail to all property owners within 500 feet of the site, and the City staff has posted the property. Staff has scheduled the petition for a public hearing for this meeting. PUBLIC WORKSHOP A public workshop for the subject petition was held on June 26, 2007. At the meeting, members of the public asked questions of the School District regarding landscaping, traffic patterns, ingress /egress points, mitigating construction noise and dust, and lighting. The District responded by stating the impacts to the ecological education area will be minimized, and •the new driveway through the ecological education area will be landscaped. The District also indicated the property would be surrounded by dust screens during demolition and construction, and that all construction activities would occur within the hours permitted by the City for construction. Lastly, the District indicated all lighting would be low level security lights, and they would not be in operation after hours. STAFF RECOMMENDATION In accordance with the aforementioned Florida Statutes, staff has reviewed the proposed site plan and considered its adequacy as it relates to environmental concerns, health, safety and welfare, and effects on adjacent property. Staff has determined that the proposed site plan does not raise any environmental concerns; it ensures the health, safety and welfare of the students and faculty on the school campus, as well as that of the surrounding residents and visitors to the site; it minimizes negative effects on adjacent properties; and it is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as stated herein. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of Petition CUMJ- 07 -05- 000009, subject to the conditions of approval listed below. Planning; and Zoning 1. Concurrent with the site plan approval and prior to initiation of construction, the Applicant shall install a six -foot tall construction fence with a privacy tarp around the entire property line. (Planning & Zoning) 2. At no time shall staging of construction vehicles and/or service vehicles occur within a public • right -of -way. All vehicular construction activities shall use a construction access off of Riverside Drive. 3. The Applicant shall coordinate and receive approval from the Growth Management 31 Date Prepared: July 3, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition CUMJ o7- 05- 000009 • Administrator prior to the closing of any public sidewalk. Forestry 4. Within 90 days of site plan approval, the Applicant shall restore the 25 foot wide natural landscape buffer at Nogal Circle damaged during construction to the City of Palm Beach Gardens satisfaction (including restoration of the sod, irrigation, pavement and sidewalks). A right -of -way use permit from the City of Palm Beach Gardens shall be required for this work. The City shall be responsible for the maintenance of the landscape buffer. Engineering 5. Prior to scheduling this petition for City Council review, the Applicant shall provide the City with an Operational Analysis of how traffic flow and stacking will function. The Analysis shall be subject to review and approval by the City's Engineer and Police Chief. (Planning & Zoning) 6. The Applicant shall copy to the City all applicable permit applications, permits, certifications and approvals. (City Engineer) 7. The Applicant shall provide all necessary construction zone signage and fencing as required by the City Engineer. (City Engineer) 8. Within 180 days of site plan approval, the Applicant shall plat the site the site to include all existing and proposed easements and like encumbrances, in accordance with LDR Section 78- 446 for City Council approval. Should the Applicant fail to satisfy this condition within 180 days of site plan approval the City shall suspend any right -of -way access permits. (City Engineer and Planning & Zoning) 09. The Applicant shall construct a westbound, left turn lane into the school site at the central main entrance with a minimum of 290 feet deceleration and stacking distance prior to the opening of school, or September 1, 2008 (whichever comes first). Nogal Circle is to remain closed to all school traffic, other than construction traffic until the turn lane has been constructed (City Engineer) 10. The construction, operation and/or maintenance of any elements of the subject project shall not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage of surrounding areas. If at any time during the project development it is determined by the South Florida Water Management District that any of the surrounding areas are experiencing negative drainage impacts caused by the project, it shall be the Applicant's responsibility to cure said impacts in a period of time and a manner acceptable to the City prior to additional construction activities. (City Engineer) 11. The applicant shall provide a letter of authorization from the utility easement owners authorizing encroachment of the landscape buffers within their respective utility easements. (City Engineer) 12. The Applicant shall comply with any and all Palm Beach County Traffic Division conditions as outlined in PBC Traffic Division equivalency and concurrency approval letters. (City Engineer) 13. The Applicant shall provide to the City letters of authorization from the applicable utility companies allowing landscaping and light poles to be placed within the utility easements. (City Engineer) 14. Prior to initiation of construction, the Applicant shall schedule a pre- construction meeting with City staff. (City Engineer iMiscellaneous 15. The Applicant shall notify the City's Public Works Division at least 10 working days prior to 7 Date Prepared: July 3, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition CUMJ 07 -05- 000009 • the commencement of any work/construction activity within any public right -of -way within the City of Palm Beach Gardens. In the case of a city right -of -way, the applicant has at least five working days to obtain a right -of -way permit. Right -of -way permits may be obtained at the Building Division. Failure to comply with this condition could result in a Stop Work Order of all work/construction activity within the public right -of -way and the subject development site. (Public Works) CONDITIONAL USE .ANALYSIS ATTACHMENT A City of Palm Beach Gardens LDR Section 78 -52 • (1) Comprehensive plan. The proposed use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Sta f Analusis: As demonstrated in the staff report for this petition, staff has determined that the proposed school is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. (2) Chapter requirements. The proposed use is consistent with all applicable requirements of this chapter. Sta f Analysis: Section 78 -159 of the City's LDR's, entitled Permitted uses, conditional, and prohibited uses, requires "Schools, Public and Private," located within a Public or Institutional (PI) zoning district to acquire Major Conditional Use approval from the City Council. The subject property has an underlying zoning of PI; therefore, staff has requested the application be processed as a Major Conditional Use. The proposed development plans are generally consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. (3) Standards. The proposed use is consistent with the standards for such use as provided in Section 78 -259• isSta f Analysis: The proposed use is consistent with the additional standards provided in Section 78- 15901)• (4) Public welfare. The proposed use provides for the public health, safety, and welfare by: a. Providing for a safe and effective means of pedestrian access; b. Providing for a safe and effective means of vehicular ingress and egress; C. Providing for an adequate roadway system adjacent to and front of the site; d. Providing for safe and efficient onsite traffic circulation, parking, and overall control; and • e. Providing adequate access for public safety purposes, including fire and police protection. Staff Analysis: Staff has determined that the proposed use provides for the aforesaid standards and, therefore, provides for the public health, safety, and welfare. (5) Screening and buffering. The proposed use utilizes such techniques as landscaping, screening, buffering, site or building design, or business operation procedures to mitigate impacts on surrounding properties, including such impact as: a. Noise; b. Glare; C. Odor; d. Ground -, wall-, or roof - mounted mechanical equipment; e. Perimeter, interior, and security lighting; f. Signs; g. Waste disposal and recycling; h. Outdoor storage of merchandise and vehicles; • L Visual impact; and j. Hours of operation. Stg Analysis: As provided in the staff report, City staff has continually urged the District to make every attempt to minimize the negative impacts of the project on the adjacent properties, including the issues listed above. In response, the District has identified specific construction and design practices they will be implementing to ensure the impacts on surrounding properties will be minimized. (6) Utilities. The proposed use minimizes or eliminates the impact of utility installation, including underground and overhead utilities, on adjacent properties. Staff Analysis: As provided in the staff report, the District has made every attempt to minimize the negative impacts of the project on the adjacent properties. (7) Dimensional standards. The proposed use meets or exceeds all dimensional requirements required by the chapter. Sta Analysis: The proposed site plan is generally consistent with the requirements of this • chapter. (8) Neighborhood plans. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, and standards of neighborhood plans. • Sta Analysis: N/A (9) Compatibility. The overall compatibility of the proposed development with adjacent and area uses, and character of area development. Sta Analysis: The site has functioned as a school since 1964. Furthermore, the proposed design of the school site, in staffs opinion, is compatible with the surrounding areas. (10) Patterns of development. The proposed use will result in logical, timely, and orderly development patterns. StaffAnalusis: As mentioned above, the site has operated as a high school since 1964. (11) Purpose and intent. The proposed use will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter and the goals, objectives, and policies of the City. Staff Analysis: Staff has reviewed the proposed use and found it to be in harmony with the intent of the City's LDRs and the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. (12) Adverse impact. The design of the proposed use and structures will • minimize any adverse visual impacts or impacts caused by the intensity of the use. Staff Analysis: As provided in the staff report, the District has made every attempt to minimize the negative impacts of the project on the adjacent properties. (13) Environmental impact. The design of the proposed use minimizes any adverse impacts that may be created, including impacts on environmental and natural resources including air, water, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, and wetlands. Staff AnalQsis: Staff has reviewed the proposed development plan and determined that there will be no adverse impacts on environmental and natural resources. LJ Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2006- >Ch1013- >Secti Select Year: 2006 '< >` ff Go' The 2oo6 Florida Statutes ATTACHMENT B Title XLVIII Chapter 1013 View Entire Chapter K -20 EDUCATION CODE EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES 1013.33 Coordination of planning with local governing bodies. -- (1) It is the policy of this state to require the coordination of planning between boards and local governing bodies to ensure that plans for the construction and opening of public educational facilities are facilitated and coordinated in time and place with plans for residential development, concurrently with other necessary services. Such planning shall include the integration of the educational facilities plan and applicable policies and procedures of a board with the local comprehensive plan and land development regulations of local governments. The planning must include the consideration of allowing students to attend the school located nearest their homes when a new housing development is constructed near a county boundary and it is more feasible to transport the students a short distance to an existing facility in an adjacent county than to construct a new facility or transport students longer • distances in their county of residence. The planning must also consider the effects of the location of public education facilities, including the feasibility of keeping central city facilities viable, in order to encourage central city redevelopment and the efficient use of infrastructure and to discourage uncontrolled urban sprawl. In addition, all parties to the planning process must consult with state and local road departments to assist in implementing the Safe Paths to Schools program administered by the Department of Transportation. (2)(a) The school board, county, and nonexempt municipalities located within the geographic area of a school district shall enter into an interlocal agreement that jointly establishes the specific ways in which the plans and processes of the district school board and the local governments are to be coordinated. The interlocal agreements shall be submitted to the state land planning agency and the Office of Educational Facilities and the SMART Schools Clearinghouse in accordance with a schedule published by the state land planning agency. (b) The schedule must establish staggered due dates for submission of interlocal agreements that are executed by both the local government and district school board, commencing on March 1, 2003, and concluding by December 1, 2004, and must set the same date for all governmental entities within a school district. However, if the county where the school district is located contains more than 20 municipalities, the state land planning agency may establish staggered due dates for the submission of interlocal agreements by these municipalities. The schedule must begin with those areas where both the •number of districtwide capital- outlay full - time - equivalent students equals 80 percent or more of the current year's school capacity and the projected 5 -year student growth rate is 1,000 or greater, or where the projected 5 -year student growth rate is 10 percent or greater. Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : ->2006->Ch 10 13 ->Section 33 : Online Sunshine Page 2 of 6 •(c) If the student population has declined over the 5 -year period preceding the due date for submittal of an interlocal agreement by the local government and the district school board, the local government and district school board may petition the state land planning agency for a waiver of one or more of the requirements of subsection (3). The waiver must be granted if the procedures called for in subsection (3) are unnecessary because of the school district's declining school age population, considering the district's 5 -year work program prepared pursuant to s. 1013.35. The state land planning agency may modify or revoke the waiver upon a finding that the conditions upon which the waiver was granted no longer exist. The district school board and local governments must submit an interlocal agreement within 1 year after notification by the state land planning agency that the conditions for a waiver no longer exist. (d) Interlocal agreements between local governments and district school boards adopted pursuant to s. 163.3177 before the effective date of subsections (2) -(9) must be updated and executed pursuant to the requirements of subsections (2) -(9), if necessary. Amendments to interlocal agreements adopted pursuant to subsections (2) -(9) must be submitted to the state land planning agency within 30 days after execution by the parties for review consistent with subsections (3) and (4). Local governments and the district school board in each school district are encouraged to adopt a single interlocal agreement in which all join as parties. The state land planning agency shalt assemble and make available model interlocal agreements meeting the requirements of subsections (2) -(9) and shalt notify local governments and, jointly with the Department of Education, the district school boards of the requirements of subsections (2) -(9), the dates for compliance, and the sanctions for noncompliance. The • state land planning agency shall be available to informally review proposed interlocal agreements. If the state land planning agency has not received a proposed interlocal agreement for informal review, the state land planning agency shall, at least 60 days before the deadline for submission of the executed agreement, renotify the local government and the district school board of the upcoming deadline and the potential for sanctions. (3) At a minimum, the interlocal agreement must address interlocal agreement requirements in s. 163.3180(13)(8), except for exempt local governments as provided in s. 163.3177(12), and must address the following issues: (a) A process by which each local government and the district school board agree and base their plans on consistent projections of the amount, type, and distribution of population growth and student enrollment. The geographic distribution of jurisdiction -wide growth forecasts is a major objective of the process. (b) A process to coordinate and share information relating to existing and planned public school facilities, including school renovations and closures, and local government plans for development and redevelopment. (c) Participation by affected local governments with the district school board in the process of •evaluating potential school closures, significant renovations to existing schools, and new school site selection before land acquisition. Local governments shall advise the district school board as to the consistency of the proposed closure, renovation, or new site with the local comprehensive plan, Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :->2006->Ch 10 13 ->Section 33 : Online Sunshine Page 3 of 6 •including appropriate circumstances and criteria under which a district school board may request an amendment to the comprehensive plan for school siting. (d) A process for determining the need for and timing of onsite and offsite improvements to support new construction, proposed expansion, or redevelopment of existing schools. The process shall address identification of the party or parties responsible for the improvements. (e) A process for the school board to inform the local government regarding the effect of comprehensive plan amendments on school capacity. The capacity reporting must be consistent with taws and rules regarding measurement of school facility capacity and must also identify how the district school board will meet the public school demand based on the facilities work program adopted pursuant to s. 1013.35. (f) Participation of the local governments in the preparation of the annual update to the school board's 5 -year district facilities work program and educational plant survey prepared pursuant to s. 1013.35. (g) A process for determining where and how joint use of either school board or local government facilities can be shared for mutual benefit and efficiency. (h) A procedure for the resolution of disputes between the district school board and local governments, which may include the dispute resolution processes contained in chapters 164 and 186. • (i) An oversight process, including an opportunity for public participation, for the implementation of the interlocal agreement. (4)(a) The Office of Educational Facilities and SMART Schools Clearinghouse shall submit any comments or concerns regarding the executed interlocal agreement to the state land planning agency within 30 days after receipt of the executed interlocal agreement. The state land planning agency shall review the executed interlocal agreement to determine whether it is consistent with the requirements of subsection (3), the adopted local government comprehensive plan, and other requirements of law. Within 60 days after receipt of an executed interlocal agreement, the state land planning agency shall publish a notice of intent in the Florida Administrative Weekly and shalt post a copy of the notice on the agency's Internet site. The notice of intent must state that the interlocal agreement is consistent or inconsistent with the requirements of subsection (3) and this subsection as appropriate. (b) The state land planning agency's notice is subject to challenge under chapter 120; however, an affected person, as defined in s. 163.3184(1)(a), has standing to initiate the administrative proceeding, and this proceeding is the sole means available to challenge the consistency of an interlocat agreement required by this section with the criteria contained in subsection (3) and this subsection. in order to have standing, each person must have submitted oral or written comments, recommendations, or objections to the local government or the school board before the adoption of the interlocal agreement • by the district school board and local government. The district school board and local governments are parties to any such proceeding. In this proceeding, when the state land planning agency finds the interlocal agreement to be consistent with the criteria in subsection (3) and this subsection, the Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :->2006->Ch 10 13 ->Section 33 : Online Sunshine Page 4 of 6 interlocal agreement must be determined to be consistent with subsection (3) and this subsection if the • local government's and school board's determination of consistency is fairly debatable. When the state land planning agency finds the interlocal agreement to be inconsistent with the requirements of subsection (3) and this subsection, the local government's and school board's determination of consistency shall be sustained unless it is shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the interlocal agreement is inconsistent. (c) If the state land planning agency enters a final order that finds that the interlocal agreement is inconsistent with the requirements of subsection (3) or this subsection, the state land planning agency shall forward it to the Administration Commission, which may impose sanctions against the local government pursuant to s. 163.3184(11) and may impose sanctions against the district school board by directing the Department of Education to withhold an equivalent amount of funds for school construction available pursuant to ss. 1013.65, 1013.68, 1013.70, and 1013.72. (5) If an executed interlocal agreement is not timely submitted to the state land planning agency for review, the state land planning agency shall, within 15 working days after the deadline for submittal, issue to the local government and the district school board a notice to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to submit an executed interlocal agreement by the deadline established by the agency. The agency shall forward the notice and the responses to the Administration Commission, which may enter a final order citing the failure to comply and imposing sanctions against the local government and district school board by directing the appropriate agencies to withhold at least 5 •percent of state funds pursuant to s. 163.3184(11) and by directing the Department of Education to withhold from the district school board at least 5 percent of funds for school construction available pursuant to ss. 1013.65, 1013.68, 1013.70, and 1013.72. (6) Any local government transmitting a public school element to implement school concurrency pursuant to the requirements of s. 163.3180 before the effective date of this section is not required to amend the element or any interlocal agreement to conform with the provisions of subsections (2) -(8) if the element is adopted prior to or within 1 year after the effective date of subsections (2) -(8) and remains in effect. (7) Except as provided in subsection (8), municipalities meeting the exemption criteria in s. 163.3177 (12) are exempt from the requirements of subsections (2), (3), and (4). (8) At the time of the evaluation and appraisal report, each exempt municipality shall assess the extent to which it continues to meet the criteria for exemption under s. 163.3177(12). If the municipality continues to meet these criteria, the municipality shalt continue to be exempt from the interlocal agreement requirement. Each municipality exempt under s. 163.3177(12) must comply with the provisions of subsections (2) -(8) within 1 year after the district school board proposes, in its 5 -year district facilities work program, a new school within the municipality's jurisdiction. (9) A board and the local governing body must share and coordinate information related to existing and isplanned school facilities; proposals for development, redevelopment, or additional development; and infrastructure required to support the school facilities, concurrent with proposed development. A school Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :->2006->Ch 10 13 ->Section 33 : Online Sunshine Page 5 of 6 board shall use information produced by the demographic, revenue, and education estimating . conferences pursuant to s. 216.136 when preparing the district educational facilities plan pursuant to s. 1013.35' as modified and agreed to by the local governments, when provided by interlocal agreement, and the Office of Educational Facilities and SMART Schools Clearinghouse, in consideration of local governments' population projections, to ensure that the district educational facilities plan not only reflects enrollment projections but also considers applicable municipal and county growth and development projections. The projections must be apportioned geographically with assistance from the local governments using local government trend data and the school district student enrollment data. A school board is precluded from siting a new school in a jurisdiction where the school board has failed to provide the annual educational facilities plan for the prior year required pursuant to s. 1013.35 unless the failure is corrected. (10) The location of educational facilities shalt be consistent with the comprehensive plan of the appropriate local governing body developed under part II of chapter 163 and consistent with the plan's implementing land development regulations. (11) To improve coordination relative to potential educational facility sites, a board shall provide written notice to the local government that has regulatory authority over the use of the land consistent with an interlocal agreement entered pursuant to subsections (2) -(8) at least 60 days prior to acquiring or leasing property that may be used for a new public educational facility. The local government, upon receipt of this notice, shall notify the board within 45 days if the site proposed for acquisition or lease is •consistent with the land use categories and policies of the local government's comprehensive plan. This preliminary notice does not constitute the local government's determination of consistency pursuant to subsection (12). (12) As early in the design phase as feasible and consistent with an interlocal agreement entered pursuant to subsections (2) -(8), but no later than 90 days before commencing construction, the district school board shall in writing request a determination of consistency with the local government's comprehensive plan. The local governing body that regulates the use of land shall determine, in writing within 45 days after receiving the necessary information and a school board's request for a determination, whether a proposed educational facility is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and consistent with local land development regulations. If the determination is affirmative, school construction may commence and further local government approvals are not required, except as provided in this section. Failure of the local governing body to make a determination in writing within 90 days after a district school board's request for a determination of consistency shall be considered an approval of the district school board's application. Campus master plans and development agreements must comply with the provisions of ss. 1013.30 and 1013.63. (13) A local governing body may not deny the site applicant based on adequacy of the site plan as it relates solely to the needs of the school. If the site is consistent with the comprehensive plan's land use policies and categories in which public schools are identified as allowable uses, the local government ismay not deny the application but it may impose reasonable development standards and conditions in accordance with s. 1013.51(1) and consider the site plan and its adequacy as it relates to environmental concerns, health, safety and welfare, and effects on adjacent property. Standards and conditions may • • Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2006- >Chl013- >Section 33 : Online Sunshine Page 6 of 6 not be imposed which conflict with those established in this chapter or the Florida Building Code, unless mutually agreed and consistent with the interlocal agreement required by subsections (2) -(8). (14) This section does not prohibit a local governing body and district school board from agreeing and establishing an alternative process for reviewing a proposed educational facility and site plan, and offsite impacts, pursuant to an interlocal agreement adopted in accordance with subsections (2) -(8). (15) Existing schools shall be considered consistent with the applicable local government comprehensive plan adopted under part II of chapter 163. If a board submits an application to expand an existing school site, the local governing body may impose reasonable development standards and conditions on the expansion only, and in a manner consistent with s. 1013.51(1). Standards and conditions may not be imposed which conflict with those established in this chapter or the Florida Building Code, unless mutually agreed. Local government review or approval is not required for: (a) The placement of temporary or portable classroom facilities; or (b) Proposed renovation or construction on existing school sites, with the exception of construction that changes the primary use of a facility, includes stadiums, or results in a greater than 5 percent increase in student capacity, or as mutually agreed upon, pursuant to an interlocal agreement adopted in accordance with subsections (2) -(8). History. - -s. 23, ch. 2002 -296; s. 828, ch. 2002 -387; s. 129, ch. 2003 -1; s. 18, ch. 2005 -290. Copyright © 1995 -2006 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement • Contact Us CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD • Agenda Cover Memorandum Date Prepared: July 3, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PPUD 06 -09- 000010 SUBJECT /AGENDA ITEM PPUD 06- 09- 000010: Monet Office Building — Rezoning and Site Plan Approval Recommendation to City Council: A request by Mr. Marty Minor, of Urban Design Studio, on behalf of Monet Road, LLC, for rezoning from Professional Office (PO) to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay with underlying PO and a site plan approval to allow the development of a 38,064 sf building for professional and medical office uses, to be referred to as the "Monet Office Building." The approximately 2.57 -acre parcel of land is located south of RCA Boulevard and west of Prosperity Farms Road. [X] Recommendation to APPROVE with two (2) waivers and conditions of approval [ ] Recommendation to DENY Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: FINANCE: PZAB Action: Growth Management: Finance [ ] Approved City Attorney Christine P. Tatum Project Administrator: [ ] App. w/ conditions Mana er' g [ ] Denied Finance Administrator Todd M. Miller, AICP Allan Owens [ ] Rec. approval Allan Owens Principal Planner [ ] Rec. app. w/ conds. ] Quasi — Judicial Building Accountant: [ ] Rec. Denial Development ntCompliance x [ ] Legislative gy [ ]Continued to: Bahareh Keshavarz - Wolfs, [X] Public Hearing K. Labossiere AICP Fees Paid: [ ] Advertised: Attachments: Growth Manag a Date: 6/29/07 Date: A. Application B. Project Narrative Administrator Paper: Palm Beach Post C. PBC Traffic Kara Irwin, Al P concurrency letter [X] Required [ ] Not Required Budget Acct-#: D. Site, Development Plans Approved By: City Manager N/A E. Color Site Plans, Elevations, and Cross Sections Affected Parties: [X] Notified Ronald M. Ferris [ ] Not Required • Date Prepared: July 3, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PPUD- o6 -o9 -io BACKGROUND The subject 2.57 acre parcel was rural residential land in unincorporated Palm Beach County until 1984, when the City passed Ordinance 3, 1985 approving the annexation and rezoning of the parcel to Commercial Professional Office. However, the residential uses remained in place even while the property to the east was redeveloped from a school and residences to a professional office complex (Village Square Crossing). Currently, the owner of the subject parcel is requesting a rezoning from Professional Office (PO) to a Planned Unit Development Overlay with underlying PO (PUD /PO) to permit the development of a 38,064 square foot office building. LAND USE & ZONING The land -use designation of the Site as shown on the City's Future Land Use Map is Professional Office (PO). The site currently has a designation of Professional Office (PO) zoning. The applicant is requesting approval of a rezoning to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay with an underlying zoning of Professional Office (PO). The existing land uses and zoning designations of properties surrounding the Site are provided in the following table: ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS, LAND -USE DESIGNATIONS Subject Property Professional Office Professional Office Two residential dwelling units. (PO) (PO) North Professional Office Commercial (C) Courtyard Gardens Office Complex (PO) Planned Unit South Club Oasis Development (PUD) Residential Low Overlay with (� ) Substance Abuse Treatment underlying Residential Low, 3 RL3 Planned Unit East Development (PUD) Professional Office Village Square Crossing Office Complex Overlay with (PO) underlying Professional Office (PO) Planned Unit West Development Overlay Oaks East with underlying Residential Medium Residential Low (RL) Date Prepared: July 3, 2007 Meeting Date: July to, 2007 Petition: PPUD- 06 -o9 -io • CONCURRENCY Traffic On April 18, 2005, traffic concurrency for the Monet Office Building was approved for 16,064 square feet of general office use, and 22,000 square feet of medical office use. (See Attachment). City traffic concurrency was granted on July 6, 2007. PROJECT DETAILS The proposed commercial development will consist of a 38,064 square feet two (2) story office building. Architecture The proposed building is done in stucco with a flat tile roof, arched windows and entrances, second floor balconies, and the use of awnings. Both the north and south elevations are mirror images of each other, and the applicant has provided a covered arcade area over the primary entrances on the north and south elevations. The architecture is compatible with the adjacent Village Square office complex buildings. Landscaping - The landscaping is dominated by Live Oaks, Christmas Palms and Sabal Palms. The landscape plans exceed the minimum required landscape points. Specifically, the project is required 3,856 points, and the applicant has provided a total of 8,452 points. In addition, the applicant has provided more open space than is required (15% required versus 23% open space provided). Also, the required 8' landscape buffers have been provided along all property lines. Parking Per Code, the proposed use requires 164 spaces. The applicant is providing 166 parking spaces. Specifically, the approved uses require: S image The applicant is proposing one monument project sign at the ingress /egress point at the northeast •corner of the site. The requested stucco sign is 6' in height and 12' in width, with a sign area of approximately 3' by 8'. These dimensions are consistent with Section 78 -285 of the City Code, entitled "Permitted signs ". 3 :•i::: - : W.•.•::::. •..::.•.:.•.•:::.• ::::::::::::. R:. :: i7�Sji{::• j:{ Y:? :t::::i::ii::ii::i::i::ii�::: :: .. .{ .y.}�y ...................... v: •. w::.::. ti:: v: .. i � ' 2::CL:::iY ....... - .:. .. .. i4:�:4i:•:•:•h :::: +.fi::4i: is ii:J:�ii ::1,{' .!: }fit•': • : � ' ;:j• •i :y :• + i::::::: is •: :: :: :: :::•i:•i:•:ivi$iiiiiiii ..........:..... ... .. ....... ................ ii: ....... X...: • :i:•i:'ii.: •: x: i:::.. :i: i :i •: • . :::i:: ?:: :: :::: :::;:: }:::.: :.. ::.. ;... .......i...:.:.::•::.i::: -: iiiii: .;• '• ; ., .:,,.::: ::::::::::::::. ,y��ry�{� pap 16 064 1 r 300 e sf 54 55 1`±}i✓<< 22,000 1 pe r 200 sf 110 111 38,064 164 166 S image The applicant is proposing one monument project sign at the ingress /egress point at the northeast •corner of the site. The requested stucco sign is 6' in height and 12' in width, with a sign area of approximately 3' by 8'. These dimensions are consistent with Section 78 -285 of the City Code, entitled "Permitted signs ". 3 Date Prepared: July 3, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PPUD- o6 -o9 -10 •However, Section 78 -285 permits monument signs for properties with a minimum of 300' of road right -of -way frontage only. The subject property does not abut a public right -of -way, but instead has legal ingress /egress to Prosperity Farms Road via an access easement through the Village Square property. Therefore, the applicant has requested a waiver to Section 78 -285 to permit the installation of a single monument sign on the property, which will not be visible from any road right -of -way. Access Currently, the two residential homes on the property have legal ingress /egress via an access easement connecting the property with RCA Boulevard to the north. In addition, there is another access easement providing legal ingress /egress to Prosperity Farms Road, which crosses the Village Square Offices to the east. The applicant is proposing to abandon the access easement currently being used to provide access to RCA Boulevard, and to develop the access to Prosperity Farms Road through the Village Square Offices. While the County and City Engineers are in support of maintaining the access to RCA, neither Engineer has required the easement be retained and improved. CPTED Compliance Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design ( CPTED) is a branch of situational crime prevention that maintains the basic premise that the physical environment can be designed or •managed to produce behavioral effects that will reduce the incident and fear of crime. The Police Department has reviewed the site plan for the subject property, and has provided staff with several comments pertaining to security on site and adherence to the CPTED principles. These comments will be included in the development order as conditions of approval. WAIVER REQUESTS The aDDlicant is reauestine the followine two (2) waivers (Dlease see attached waiver iustificatinn)- Code Section Required Provided Recommendation No monument I monument sign Section 78 -285 entitled Permitted signs for properties with for a parcel Signs less than 300' of without any Approval (1) road righ -of- -way Public righ -of- frontage way frontage Section 78 -315 entitled 1 landscape island 1 island per 26 Landscaping and Screening for for every 9 spaces on southern property Approval (2) Vehicle Parking Areas parking spaces line 1. Section 78 -285 of the City Code - Waiver to permit a monument sign on a parcel of land without any road right -of -way frontage. •Applicant's Justification: The applicant is requesting to be allowed a monument sign on property which does not have any public right -of -way frontage. Section 78 -285 permits 4 Date Prepared: July 3, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PPUD- o6 -o9 -10 • monument signs on properties which have a minimum of 300' of public right -of -way frontage. The applicant has indicated the request is to ensure that users are efficiently and safely directed to the offices. Staff Recommendation: The intent of the code requirement is to prevent the proliferation of roadside monument signs which could occur as a result of several properties with limited road frontage. Without this provision, monument signs could be placed every 100 or 200 feet along a road right -of -way, thereby adversely impacting the streetscape of the corridor. However, the applicant's property has no road frontage. As a result, there will be no negative impact on road rights -of -way. In addition, the applicant is proposing a monument sign smaller than code permits. Specifically, the applicant is proposing a 12' by 6' high sign, whereas the code permits ground signs to be 15' wide by 10' tall. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of the waiver request. 2. Section 78 -315 of the City Code — Waiver to reduce the requirement for one parking island for every 9 parking spaces along the southern property line. Applicant's Justification: The applicant is requesting a waiver from the requirement that a landscape island be provided between every nine parking spaces. The waiver is being requested to accommodate the preservation of the largest on -site Oak tree, a 35 foot tall Live Oak, with a 28 inch caliper trunk located on the southern property line. The applicant has designed the single parking island around the base of the tree to be 16' deep and 16' wide to • accommodate the tree. Staff's Recommendation: Staff is in agreement with the applicant's justification. Staff also notes that the City Code identifies the preservation of valuable natural resources as a criteria for granting a waiver. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of the waiver request. Please note that staff has determined that, since the property does not have any road right -of -way frontage, a front setback does not apply. Therefore, no waiver for a front setback is necessary. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of Petition PPUD- 06 -09- 000010 with three (3) waivers and the conditions of approval listed below. Planning and Zoning 1. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the Applicant shall submit a Master Signage program for review and approval of the Planning and Zoning Department. (Planning & Zoning) 2. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant shall comply with Section 78 -262 of the City Code relative to Art in Public Places. The Applicant shall provide art on site or make a payment in lieu thereof. The Art in Public Places Advisory Board shall review and make a recommendation to the City Council on any proposed art on site. If the Applicant is • providing public art on site, the art shall be installed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, or as determined by the application for approval of the art. (City Forester) 5 Date Prepared: July 3, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PPUD- o6 -o9 -10 • Landscapiny- 3. In accordance with Section 78 -305 (c) 7 k of the LDR, a conceptual irrigation system plan shall be provided prior to presentation to City Council. (City Forester) 4. Prior to any land alteration permits, the city shall have the option to salvage any vegetation in harms way for public use that will not be used in the future landscaping on the site. (City Forester) 5. Prior to issuance of the first clearing permit, the Applicant shall provide a plan acceptable to the City Forester for tree protection and replacement requirements in the event of loss of any trees that remain on site. (City Forester) 6. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, all utilities shall be placed underground in accordance with section 78 -510 of the Land Development Regulations. (City Forester) 7. Prior to the first land alteration permit, funds shall be placed in escrow, or a surety bond provided, for an amount equal to 110% of the estimated cost for landscaping. (City Forester) 8. All removal of exotic plant species from the site shall be completed before the first Certificate of Occupancy. (City Forester) Engineering 9. Applicant shall copy to the City all permit applications, permits, certifications and approvals. (City Engineer) 10. Applicant shall provide all necessary construction zone signage and fencing as required by •the City Engineer. (City Engineer) 11. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the Applicant shall provide a cost estimate for the project, including public infrastructure and all landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the City in order to establish surety. The cost estimate shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and landscape architect registered in the state of Florida. Surety will be based on I 10% of the total combined approved cost estimates and shall be posted with the City, prior to the issuance of the first building permit. In accordance with Section 78 -309 & 78 -461 of the LDR. (City Engineer) 12. Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the Applicant shall plat the site to include all existing and proposed easements and like encumbrances, in accordance with LDR Section 78 -446 for City Council approval. (City Engineer and Planning & Zoning) 13. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, Applicant shall provide cost estimates in accordance with LDR Section 78 -309 and 78 -461 and for on -site project improvements, not including public infrastructure, or landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the City. The cost estimates shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and landscape architect registered in the state of Florida and shall be posted with the City, prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit. (City Engineer) 14. The construction, operation and/or maintenance of any elements of the subject project shall not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage of surrounding areas. If, at any time during the project development, it is determined by the City that any of the surrounding areas are experiencing negative drainage impacts caused by the project, it shall be the Applicant's responsibility to cure said impacts in a period of time and a manner acceptable • to the City prior to additional construction activities. (City Engineer) N Date Prepared: July 3, 2007 Meeting Date: July io, 2oo7 Petition: PPUD- o6 -o9 -io • 15. Prior to issuance of the first land alteration permit, the Applicant shall submit signed/sealed/dated construction plans (paving/grading /drainage and water /sewer) and all pertinent calculations for review and comment. (City Engineer) 16. The build -out date is December 31, 2010. No building permits shall be issued after that date. 17. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the Applicant shall schedule a pre - permit meeting with City staff. (City Engineer) 18. Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the Applicant shall provide to the City letters of authorization from the applicable utility companies allowing landscaping and light poles to be placed within the utility easements. (City Engineer) 19. Applicant shall notify the City's Public Works Division at least 10 working days prior to the commencement of any work/construction activity within any public right -of -way within the City of Palm Beach Gardens. In the case of a city right -of -way, the Applicant has at least five working days to obtain a right -of -way permit. Right -of -way permits may be obtained at the Building Division. Failure to comply with this condition could result in a Stop Work Order of all work/construction activity within the public right -of -way and the subject development site. (Public Works) 20. Only pipe materials allowed by City Code shall be utilized. (City Engineer) 21. Handicap signage shall conform with all FDOT regulations and City Code requirements. (City Engineer) Police • 22. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, all on -site lighting shall be installed, including all exterior pedestrian walkway lighting, which shall utilize 12 foot pedestrian scale light poles. All on -site lighting shall consist of metal halide or equivalent lighting approved by the Police Department. (Police Department) 23. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the building, an inspection by City staff shall determine that lighting locations and building addresses do not conflict with landscaping, including long -term tree canopy growth. (Police Department) 24. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the building, the Applicant shall provide a timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting above or near entryways and adjacent sidewalks for said building. (Police Department) 25. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the building, all entry doors shall be equipped with a metal plate over the threshold of locking mechanism and case hardened deadbolt locks on all exterior doors with minimum one (1) inch throw; door hinges on the interior side of each door, and the main entries to the building shall be wired for closed - circuit digital camera surveillance system. (Police Department) 26. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant shall submit a construction site security and management plan for review and approval by the Police Department. Noncompliance with the approved security and management plan may result in a stop -work order for the PUD. (Police Department 27. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the building, all numerical addresses shall be placed at the front of the building. Each numerical address shall be illuminated for nighttime visibility, shall provide bi- directional visibility from the roadway • (when applicable), shall consist of twelve (12) inches in height, and shall be a different color than the color of the surface to which it is attached. The rear doors of a building with multiple tenants shall have an illuminated 6 inch suite number on or along side door. (Police 7 Date Prepared: July 3, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PFUD- o6 -o9 -10 •Department) 28. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the building, elevator cab interiors which are not completely visible when door is open, shall have shatter resistant mirrors placed in a location approved by the Police Department. (Police Department) 29. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the building shall have roof top numbers placed parallel to the addressed street, only visible from the air. The numerals should be white blocked lettered, weather resistant material, four feet in height and 18 inches wide. (Police Department) 30. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for each building, interior stairwells doors shall have glazing vision panels, five inches wide by 20 inches in height. Areas beneath stairways at ground level shall be fully enclosed. Fully enclosed stairways with solid walls shall have shatter resistant mirrors at each level and landing placed to provide visibility around corners. (Police Department) • Miscellaneous. 31. Required digital files of the approved plat shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Division prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, and approved civil design and architectural drawings shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. (GIS Manager, Development Compliance Office). 0 ATTACHMENT MENT A CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Planning and Zoning Division Growth Management Department CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS 10500 North Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 (561) 799 -4243 Fax (561) 799 -4281 Request: _Planned Community Development (PCD) ✓Planned Unit Development (PUD) — Amendment to PCD, PUD or Site Plan —Conditional Use _ Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan _Administrative Approval Administrative Appeal Project Name: Monet Office Building Annexation Rezoning _Site Plan Review ✓Concurrency Certificate _Time Extension Miscellaneous _Other Date Submitted: _0711812006 Owner: Monet Road LLC Address: 260 Fortuna Dr, PBG, FL 33410 Applicant (if not Owner): n/a Applicant's Address: n/a Agent: Urban Design Studio Contact Person: Marty Minor Telephone No. (561) 863 -8501 E -Mail: mminor @UDSonline.com Agent's Mailing Address: 477 S. Rosemary Avenue, Suite 225, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Agent's Telephone Number: (561) 366 -1100 Fax Number: (561) 366 -1111 Petition Number: Fees Recived Application $ Receipt Number: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date & Time Received: Engineering $ SCI' 15 2006 s GDNS PLANNING & ZONING DIV • Architect: Randy Hanson, Interplan Architects Phone Number: (407) 645 -5008 _ Engineer: Paul Buri, Simmons & White Phone Number: (5611478 -7848 Planner: Marty Minor, Urban Design Studio Phone Number: (561) 366 -1100 Landscape Architect: Urban Design Studio Phone Number: (561) 66 -1100 Site Information• Note: Petitioners shall submit electronic digital files of approved projects. See attachment for details. General Location: South of RCA Boulevard, west of Prosperity Farms Road Address: 10960 Monet Rd Section: 08 Township: 42 Range: 43 Acreage: 2.57 ac Current Zoning: PO Requested Zoning: PUD Flood Zone B Base Flood Elevation (BFE) — to be indicated on site plan Current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: PO • Existing Land Use: Two Single Family Homes Requested Land Use: One Office Building Proposed Use(s) i.e. hotel, single family residence, etc.: Office Building Proposed Square Footage by Use: 22,000 sf Office, Medical & 16,064 sf Office, Business or Professional Proposed Number and Type of Dwelling Unit(s) i.e. single family, multifamily, etc. (if applicable): __n /a_ _ __......_.... Justification Information concerning all requests (attach additional sheets if needed.) {Section 78 -46, Application Procedures, Land Development Regulations) 1. Explain the nature of the request: The applicant proposes to rezone a 2.57 acre parcel from the Professional and Office (PO) district to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow for the establishment of a two -story office building and associated surface parking on the site. The gross floor area of the office building will be 38,064 square feet (sq ft) and will comprise of 22,000 sq ft of Medical Office use and 16,064 sq ft of Business or Professional Office use. The site will be accessed fiam Piuspeilty Farms Road via C311 udziul I le[It acruss art adjacent office property (Village Square Crossing), which is directly east of the site. It should be noted that with 2 the site meets the standards set forth in the Land Development Regulations for the PO district. While the actual building will meet the required front setback of 25 feet, the • stairwell is minimum of 20 feet from the lot line. To allow for the preservation of an approximately 35 foot tall Oak tree with a 28" caliper trunk on the southern boundary of the site, the applicant is also requesting a waiver from Sec. 78- 315(b) to allow more than nine parking spaces in a row without a parking lot island. a applicant is requesting a PUD due to these slight modifications. 2. What will be the impact of the proposed change on the surrounding area? The proposed office building will have a layout and architecture similar to the office meets the required 75 foot setback from residential uses to the west and south. Further, the site has been designed to position the smallest profile of the office building towards the residential uses to the west. 3. Describe how the rezoning request complies with the City's Vision Plan and the following elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan — Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Infrastructure, Coastal Management, Conservation, Recreation and Open space, Intergovernmental Coordination and Capital Improvement. The Future Land Use and current zoning designation of the site is Professional /Office (P a site currently contains two single- family dwellings, which are non-conforming uses. The applicant's proposal will comply with the City's Vision for the site by establishing an office use on the site, which does not exceed the recommende-d35ToTo1 coverage or exceed the maximum building height of 36 feet. 4. How does the proposed project comply with City requirements for preservation of natural resources and native vegetation (Section 78 -301, Land Development Regulations)? The site does not meet the applicability requirements for Section 78 -301 of the Land Development Regulations. However, the site design does allow for the preservation of 17 existing trees on -site. • • 5. How will the proposed project comply with City requirements for Art in Public Places (Chapter 78 -261, Land Development Regulations)? The applicant recognizes this requirement and will work with the City to locate an appropriate piece of art on the site which fulfills the Art in Public Places requirement. 6. Has project received concurrency certification? Concurrency certification for the site is currently being requested. Date received: n/a • Legal Description of the Subject Property (Attach additional sheets if needed) Or see attached deed for legal description. is 4 • Location The subject properly is located approximately 9•1 mile(s) from the intersection of RCA Blvd & Prosperity Farms Rd. , on the _ north, _east, _south, Xwest side of Prosperity Farms Road (street/road). Property Control Number(s) of the subject parcel(s): 52-43-42-08-00-000-3020 Statement of Ownership and Designation of Authorized Agent • Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared James Paisley, officer of Monet Road LLC who, being by me first duly sworn, on oath deposed and says: 1. That- he /she is the fee simple title owner of the property described in the attached Legal Description. 2. That he /she is requesting approval of a Planned Unit Development in the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. 3. That he /she has appointed Urban Design Studio to act as authorized agent on his/her behalf to accomplish the above project. Name of Owner: James Paisley, officer of Monet Road LLC Signature ier By: Name/Title 260 Fortuna Dr. • Street Address n/a P. O. Box (561) 863 -8501 Telephone Number n/a E -mail Address Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 City, State, Zip Code n/a City, State, Zip Code (561) 863 -8502 Fax Number Sworn and subscribed before me this \cam ay of _ � �`1 , Z�b J11_1�Lj0t)J Notary Pdblic My Commission expires: i � , 2x0 gti�rYrvo SHARON CAMPBELL �,� MY COMMISSION # DD 519794 '?pi Vot EXPIRES: February 16, 2010 1.900 -3- NOTARY FL Nolwy Discount Assoc. Co. • • Applicant's Certification I/We affirm and certify that I /we understand and will comply with the land development regulations of the City of Palm Beach Gardens; Florida. UWE further certify that the statements or diagrams made on any paper or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Further, I /we understand that this application, attachments, and application filing fees become a part of the official records of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and are not returnable. Applicant is: AV Signature of pplicant _Owner Urban Design Studio Print Name of Applicant _Optionee 477 South Rosemary Avenue, Suite 225 Street Address Lessee West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 City, State, Zip Code X Agent (561 ) 366 -1100 Telephone Number _Contract Purchaser (561 ) 366 -1111 Fax Number mminor @UDSonline.com E -Mail Address 7 C [Y OF PALM BCN GDP(5 JUI 0 31007 ftNING & iONINU DIV JECT NARRATIVE MONET OFFICE BUILDING REZONING REQUEST TO PUD & CONCURRENCY REQUEST July 18, 2006 (updated May f 5, 2007) (updated June 12, 2007 Request ATTACHMENT B urban Urban Design Urban Planning Land Planning Landscape Architecture The applicant requests to rezone a 2.57 acre parcel located south of RCA Boulevard and west of Prosperity Farms Road in the City of Palm Beach Gardens, from the Professional and Office (PO) district to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow for the establishment of a two -story office building and associated surface parking, to be known as the Monet Office Building. The applicant also requests a Concurrency Certificate for the project. Existing Conditions and Surrounding Uses The subject parcel currently contains two single - family dwellings, constructed in 1948 and 1976. • Currently, access is provided to the parcel and the single- family dwellings via a gravel road, which connects the site to RCA Boulevard. The gravel road is contained in an access easement that crosses through the Courtyards Office Condo Complex to the north of the parcel. The existing dwelling units will be razed as a result of the proposed Monet Office Building, and the current access easement across the property to the north connecting the site to RCA Boulevard will no longer be utilized. The zoning designation and Future Land Use (FLOP) designation of the subject parcel and the surrounding parcels are as follows: EXISTING USE ZONING FUTURE LAND USE SUBJECT PROPERTY: Professional Office (PO) District Professional Office (PO) TO THE NORTH: Professional Office (PO) District Commercial (C) Courtyard Gardens Condo Office complex TO THE EAST: Professional Office (PO) District Professional Office (PO) Village Square Crossing Office complex 477 S. Rosemary Avenue Suite M25 - T e Lofts at City Place (i:Uubs \Puixlcy OpSlUlll HumcsU'Hli Pn�p \lubwilhJ llucs� -12 -U7 Submisxiuu - waivcradded fur+igullLcviscd Prujcct Nnaahvc UJ.w LCU35 West Palm each, FL 33401 is 561.366.1100 "561.366.1111 tax www.UDSonline.com LCC35 LJ Monet Office Building July18, 2006 (updated June 12, 2007) Page 2 TO THE SOUTH: Residential low density (RL3) Residential Low (RL) Club Oasis Substance abuse treatment TO THE WEST: Residential medium density (RM) Residential Low (RL) The Oaks Residential Community Single- family detached Description of Request As indicated above, the FLUP designation and current zoning designation of the site is Professional /Office (PO). The site currently contains two single - family dwellings, which is not in harmony with the FLUP designation and non - conforming to the site's zoning designation. The applicant's proposal will comply with the City's vision for the site by establishing an office use on the site. The proposed Monet Office Building will have a total gross floor area (GFA) of 38,064 square feet (sq ft) and will comprise of 22,000 sq ft of Medical Office use and 16,064 sq ft of Business or Professional Office use. • The proposed office use is compatible with the office uses directly to the north, northeast and east of the site. Particularly, the layout and architecture of the Monet Office Building will be similar to the office buildings directly to the east and northeast of the site, known as Village Square Crossing. The seven office buildings that comprise Village Square Crossing and the Monet Office Building will all be two -story linear buildings with pitched roofs, and will have associated surface parking surrounding the buildings. The Monet Office Building site will be accessed via an easement provided through the Village Square Crossing property on an existing drive aisle and will serve to connect the subject property to Prosperity Farms Road. A building identification sign will be located on the subject parcel adjacent to the access road leading to the Monet Office Building. A community of single - family detached dwellings (the Oaks PUD) exist to the west of the subject site, and a substance abuse center exists to the south of the subject site. The proposed office building exceeds the required 75 foot setback from these residential uses and provides a 86 ft and 140 ft setback to the west and south, respectively. Further, the site has been designed to position the smallest profile of the office building towards the residential uses to the west, which has the smaller of the two provided setbacks. The Monet Office Building is anticipated to be office condo units. Accordingly, the office building will have ten points of entry on the ground floor with a sidewalk around the building perimeter connecting all entry ways. The second floor office units will be access via an internal • (i:Vubs \Paisley Cuxlmu HumuST136 Prup\Submillcd Uucs\6.12 -07 Submissiuu - waiver added fur sign\Kcviscd Yrujuct Narmlivc 6.12-07.wpd LCC35 0 C� Monet Office Building July18, 2006 (updated June 12, 2007) Page 3 elevator and stairwell. Surface parking will be provided around the building and allows for continuous circulation throughout the parking field. Twenty one (21) existing Oak trees will be preserved on -site, including an Oak with a 24 inch caliper, two Oaks with a 26 inch caliper, and one Oak with a 28 inch caliper. The site will be landscaped with additional trees at the perimeter as well as with foundation plantings. Compliance With the exception of the monument sign request and the spacing of parking lot islands, the site is in compliance with the Land Development Regulations (LDRs) as illustrated below. PUD REQUIRED/ PROVIDED CONSISTENT PERMITTED Minimum Size 1 acre 2.57 acres Yes Open Space 15% 22% Yes PO DISTRICT Min. Lot Width 100 feet 333 feet Yes Max. Lot Coverage 35% 17% Yes Max. Building Height 36 feet 36 feet Yes Min. Building Setbacks Front N/A N/A N/A Side 15 feet 140 feet Yes Side (street facing) 15 feet 86/20 feet Yes Rear 15 feet 78 feet Yes Parking - Total 164 spaces 166 spaces Yes Medical Office 110 Business /Professional 54 Loading 1 space 1 space Yes • 0:Vubs \Paisley Custuut HumusTH i Ptvp \Submitted Vut:06.12 -07 Submissiuu -waiver added rursiguUtevised Project Narrative 6- 12- 07.wpd LCC75 • Monet Office Building July18, 2006 (updated June 12, 2007) Page 4 Waivers Requested The applicant is requesting two waivers from the Land Development Regulations (LDR). Section 78- 315(b) Landscape Islands - The applicant is requesting a waiver from the requirement that a landscape island be provided between every nine parking spaces. Of the twenty two (22) Oak trees that are being preserved on site, the largest is an approximately 35 foot tall Oak with a 28 inch caliper trunk. This Oak is located on the southern boundary of the site. To allow for the preservation of this tree, the applicant is providing a landscape island at that location. Fourteen (14) parking spaces in a row to the west of the landscape island, and twelve (12) parking spaces in a row to the east of the landscape island result from the placement of the landscape island. Section 78 -285 Permitted Signs - The applicant is requesting a waiver from the Code provision that permits one ground sign on the site for the first 300 lineal feet of ROW. The subject property is uniquely situated and does not have any ROW, but instead will be accessed from Prosperity Farms Road through the adjacent Village Square office complex. To ensure that users are efficiently and safely directed to the Monet Medical and Professional Offices, the applicant is requesting a waiver to allow a ground sign at the point of ingress /egress to the site, as indicated on the Site Plan and Landscape Plan. The proposed ground sign will comply with all other Code provisions for ground signs. Traffic Concurrency Certificate The applicant is requesting a Certificate of Concurrency for the proposed project. Accordingly, a Traffic Impact Analysis has been prepared for the site by Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. and is included in the application package for your review. (i:Uubs\Paislcy Custum H0111Cs\P80 Piup \Submitted UucA -12 -0 Submissiuu - waiver added fur sigiARevised Pruject Nanativc 6.12-U7.wpd LCC35 XCII �L01111 April 25, 2007 ATTACHMENT C Department of Engineering and Public Works Ms. Judy Dye, PE. Assistant City Engineer PO. Box 2122() City of Palm Beach Gardens West Palm Beach. FL 33416 -1229 3550 S.W. Corporate Pkwy. (561) 684 -4000 Palm City, FL 34990 Fax: (561) 000 -0000 RE: Paisley Offices www.pbcgov.com Project it: 061029 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW Dear Judy: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the revised traffic study and the supplemental analysis for the proposed project entitled; Paisley Office, pursuant to the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Land Board of County Development Code. The project is summarized as follows: Commissioners Addie L. Greene. Chairperson ( Location: West Side of Prosperity Farms Road, south of RCA Boulevard. Palm Beach Gardens •Municipality: Jeff Koons. vice Chair PCN #: 52- 43- 42 -08 -00 -000 -3020 Existing Uses: None Karen T. Marcus Proposed Uses: 16,064 SF General Office, and 22,000 SF Medical Offices. Warren H. Newell New Daily Trips: 1,065 New PH Trips: 93 AM and 120 PM Mary McCarty Build -out Year: 2010 Burt Aaronson Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the proposed project meets Jess R. Santamaria the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. It is however suggested for the City to consider keeping the existing site access to the existing 26111 Tier in order to relieve Prosperity Farms Road from unnecessary trips especially on the NBL movement of the RCA intersection. No building permits are to be issue by the town after the build out date, specified above. The County traffic concurrency approval is subject to the County Administrator Project Aggregation Rules set forth in the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684 -4030. Robert Weisman Sincerely, Masoud Atefi, MSpt TPS Administrat25r, Municipalities - Traffic Division CC: Kimley -Horn & Associates Inc. All F.yuo /O/rpoilunrq' :tfformans- e Action Fmplgyer' File: General - TPS - Mun - Traff ic Study Review F:\TRAFFIC\ma\Admin\Approvals\2006\061029.doc Wprinted on recycled paper • • CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD Agenda Cover Memorandum Date Prepared: June 17, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 LDRA- 07 -04- 000014 Subject/Agenda Item: LDRA- 07 -04- 000014: LDR Text Amendment: Parking Rate for Drugstore or Pharmacy, General, with Drive - Through Service. Public Hearing & Recommendation to City Council: A request by Brian Cheguis of Cotleur & Hearing, Inc., on behalf of Joel Prince, applicant, for an amendment to the City's Land Development Regulations ( "LDRs") to establish a parking rate for drugstores or pharmacies with drive - through service for consistency with the parking demand as observed locally for such uses. U Recommendation to APPROVE ] Recommendation to DENY Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: FINANCE: PZAB Action: Growth [ ] Approved Planning Manager Management: Bu' Account . [ ]A p. w/ conditions Bradley Wiseman Project Manager [ ]Denied By: K. Labossiere [ ] Rec. approval City Attorney Richard Marrero Fees Paid [ ]Rec. app. w/ conds. Christine P. Tatum, Esq. Planner [ ] Rec. Denial [ ] Quasi- Judicial Costs: [ ]Continued Development Compliance [X] Legislative $ N/A to: NA [X] Public Hearing Total Bahareh Wolfs, AICP Advertised: Attachments: Growth Mana#CP Date: June 29, 2007 N/A a Applicant's Administrator Paper: Palm Beach Current FY Narrative Kara L. Irwin, Post . parkin Demand g [X] Required Funding Source: Study • Parking Demand Study Executive [ ] Operating Summary Approved By: • McMahon Ronald M. Ferris [X] Associates memo Affected parties: [ ] Notified Other N/A dated May 10, 2007 City Manager [X] Not Required • Applicant's response dated Budget Acct. #: June 12, 2007 NA • McMahon Associates memo dated June 15-, 2007 Date prepared: June 17, 2007 Meeting Date: July 1o, 2007 LDRA- 07 -04- 000014 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed applicant - initiated amendment to the City's LDRs will establish a parking rate of one (1) parking space per 250 gross square feet of area or four (4) spaces per 1,000 gross square feet of area, for drugstores or pharmacies that contain drive- through service. Currently, the LDRs do not distinguish a different parking rate for drugstores or pharmacies with drive- through service. The current code contains a general parking rate of one (1) space per 200 gross square feet of area, or five (5) spaces per 1,000 gross square feet of area, for all drugstores and pharmacies, regardless of whether or not they contain drive - through service. The current parking rate for drugstores or pharmacies was codified into the LDRs in 1995 when such uses were not as common as they are today and they generally did not contain drive - through service. The proposed amendment is supported by a comprehensive parking demand study that has been accepted by the City's traffic consultant and is more specifically described herein. BACKGROUND Section 78 -751 of the LDRs defines a "Drugstore or Pharmacy, General ", as "a retail store which sells or dispenses drugs, pharmaceuticals, medical supplies, items for personal hygiene, and a wide variety of convenience or consumer goods such as beverages, pre - packaged foods, books and magazines, beauty products, tobacco products, and alcoholic beverages." • Table 33 of the LDRs, entitled "Required Off - Street Parking Spaces," requires that "Drugstore or Pharmacy, General" uses provide a minimum of one (1) parking space per 200 square gross square feet of area or five (5) spaces per 1,000 square gross square feet of area. PARKING DEMAND STUDY The applicant currently has a site plan application under review with the City's Growth Management Department, a portion of which contains a Walgreens store that is classified a as a "Drugstore or Pharmacy, General." Accordingly, the parking rate that would be applied to the Walgreens store is one (1) parking space per 200 gross square feet or five (5) spaces per 1,000 gross square feet. It is the applicant's position that such amount of parking is excessive for the Walgreens use and its associated square footage. Consequently, the applicant contracted the services of Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc., to submit a Parking Demand Study ( "Study ") of existing uses of the same nature as the Walgreens use within the City and its surrounding areas in order to observe the parking demand of such uses. The Study summarizes an analysis of the observed parking demand for nine (9) pharmacy /drug stores, all of which contain drive through service. Parking counts for the nine (9) stores were taken on a typical Wednesday and Friday from 11 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. at half -hour intervals by aerial photos taken by helicopter. The study was conducted on Friday, October 20, 2006 and Wednesday, October 25, 2006. Since the parking observations were performed outside the peak season, a conversion factor of 1.21 and 1.19 respectively were applied to the actual counts to generate a peak season 2 Date prepared: June 17, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 LDRA- 07 -04- 000014 • maximum. The results of the Study demonstrate that the peak season, maximum parking demand observed for all nine (9) sites was 2.87 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet. Please see enclosed Study as well as the Parking Demand Study Executive Summary also prepared by Kimley -Horn for more detailed information. STAFF REVIEW OF PARKING STUDY Staff has submitted the Study to the City's traffic consultant, McMahon Associates, for a technical review. After a comprehensive review of the Study and additional information supplied by the applicant, McMahon Associates has issued a comment memorandum dated June 18, 2007, stating that the Study has been deemed acceptable (please see attached comment memorandums). PROPOSED LDR TEXT AMENDMENT The results of the Study demonstrate that the observed maximum parking demand for drugstores or pharmacies with drive - through service within the City and its surrounding areas is less than three (3) spaces per 1,000 gross square feet. The applicant's position is that the current LDR requirement of five (5) spaces per 1,000 gross square feet is inconsistent with the observed parking demand of such uses in the area. • The current LDR parking ratio for drugstores or pharmacies has at least remained unchanged since 1995. One could assert that due to the proliferation of and changes to these uses in recent years that the parking demand has potentially changed since the current applicable section of the LDR was codified. As an example of the changes, Walgreens opened its 3000th store in Chicago in 2000 and it operates more than 5,600 retail stores today. Likewise, CVSlPharmacy Stores grew to about 3,900 stores in 1997 and today it operates over 6,200 stores. Similarly, the incorporation of drive - through service in the mid- 1990's has changed how pharmacy stores typically operate. Walgreens opened its first drugstore with a drive - through pharmacy in 1992 and the parking demand of such uses is not as intense on a per- square -foot basis as in the mid- 1990s. Therefore, an examination of parking demand for drugstores and pharmacies with drive - through services is an appropriate response to changing situations. The applicant examined the parking demand through the Parking Demand Study prepared by Kimley -Horn. The results of the Study demonstrate that the current parking rate established in the LDRs for drugstores or pharmacies requires more parking than the observed parking demand for such uses that contain drive - through service. It is for the reasons mentioned above that the applicant is requesting an amendment to the City's LDRs to create a new parking rate for drugstores or pharmacies that contain drive - through service at one (1) space per 250 gross square feet, or four (4) spaces per 1,000 gross square feet. It is important to note that the existing parking requirement for drugstores or pharmacies that do not contain drive- through service is not proposed to be amended by way of this petition. It is proposed that a new 3 Date prepared: June 17, 2007 Meeting Date: July xo, 2007 LDRA -0 7 -04- 000014 • category for such uses and the associated parking requirement be created within Table 33 of the LDRs as follows: It should be noted that the Study demonstrates that the observed parking demand for such use is 2.87 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet or less. It should also be noted that although the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Parking Generation Report, 3rd Edition reports an average supply of 4.9 spaces per 1,000 gross square feet of area, the average parking demand is a rate of 2.02 parking spaces per 1,000 gross square feet for such uses. The Institute of Transportation Engineers' Parking Generation Report, Yd Edition also indicates the maximum parking demand in their research is 3.67 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. In an effort to maintain a parking requirement that would afford the resident the convenience of locating a parking space, the requested amendment establishes a rate of four (4) spaces per 1,000 gross square feet and is limited to those drugstores or pharmacies that contain drive- through service. The applicant's proposed parking rate requires more parking spaces per gross square feet of area (4) than the Study (2.87) and the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Parking Generation Report, Yd Edition (3.67) suggests is the maximum parking demand for the uses. • STAFF ANALYSIS The applicant has demonstrated to the City that the current parking rate for uses such as Walgreens requires more parking than the observed parking demand for such uses within the City and its surrounding areas and the maximum parking demand rate observed by engineering professionals in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Parking Generation Report, 3rd Edition. When adequately supported by analyses undertaken by professionals utilizing professionally- accepted standards, periodic amendments (or in this case additions) to certain aspects of the City's LDRs are necessary in order to maintain their consistency with ever - changing situations. The subject amendment is a justified example of such needed change. It is well supported and will be a benefit to the City and its residents because it will reduce the number of potentially unused parking spaces that can be better utilized for other uses within the site. It should be noted that the proposed parking rate for drugstores or pharmacies with drive - through service, one (1) space per 250 gross square feet of area, is consistent with the existing parking rate for general retail uses within the City. Staff feels that this is noteworthy given the fact that future buildings /sites that are designed utilizing the proposed parking rate for drugstores or pharmacies with drive - through service have the potential of being occupied by a variety of retail uses in such case where such building(s) at some point in the future is no longer occupied by the drugstore with drive - through use. 4 Date prepared: June 17, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 LDRA- 07 -04- 000014 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends APPROVAL of the LDRA- 07- 04- 000014 to establish a new parking rate for drugstores or pharmacies that contain drive through service. JUSTIFICATION FOR LDR TEXT AMENDMENT Parking Requirement for 40 Drugstore or Pharmacy, General, with Drive -Thru April 25, 2007 Reques t Cotleur & Hearing, Inc., on behalf of Joel Prince ( "Applicant "), applicant for Petition PUD -04- 03: Legends at the Gardens Planned Unit Development Amendment, hereby respectfully requests an amendment to the City of Palm Beach Gardens ( "City ") Land Development Regulations ( "LDRs ") to update the parking requirement for drugstores or pharmacies with drive -thru service for consistency with today's real -world parking demand as observed for such use within the City and its surrounding areas. Executive Summary The proposed amendment to the City's LDRs will establish a parking rate of one (1) parking space /250 square feet of space, or 4.0 spaces /1,000 square feet, for drugstores or pharmacies that contain drive -thru service. Currently, the LDRs do not contain a parking rate for drugstores or pharmacies with drive -thru service, only a blanket parking rate of one (1) space /200 square feet, or 5.0 spaces /1,000 square feet, for all drugstores and pharmacies, regardless of whether or not they contain drive -thru service. The current parking rate for drugstores or pharmacies was instituted into the LDRs in 1995 when such uses were not as common as today and did not contain drive -thru service, both of which reduce the parking demand thereof. The proposed amendment is thoroughly supported by a comprehensive parking demand study that is more - specifically described herein. Background Section 78 -751 of the LDRs defines a "Drugstore or Pharmacy, General ", as "a retail store which sells or dispenses drugs, pharmaceuticals, medical supplies, items for personal hygiene, and a wide variety of convenience or consumer goods such as beverages, pre - packaged foods, books and magazines, beauty products, tobacco products, and alcoholic beverages." Table 33 of the LDRs, entitled "Required Off - Street Parking Spaces," requires that "Drugstore or Pharmacy, General" uses provide a minimum of one (1) parking space /200 square feet of space or 5.0/1,000 square feet of space. Petition PUD -04-03 In 2004, the Applicant submitted a request to the City for an amendment to the approved site plan for the commercial portion of the Legends at the Gardens Planned Unit Development to allow for the construction a free - standing Walgreens building ( "Subject Store ") and a two (2) story office building. During the initial review of the application, the Subject Store was considered a "Retail" use by the City and was designed accordingly with a parking ratio of ���� � McMAH1 1 ASSOCIATES, INC. S'M 6360 NW 5`^ Way I Suite 301 I fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 p 954 - 771 -0776 1 f 954 - 771 -1754 . . www.mcmtrans.com PRINCIPALS Joseph W. McMahon, P.E. Rodney P. Plourde, Ph.D., P.E. Joseph J. DeSantis, P.E., PTOE John S. DePaima i TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM William T. Steffens ASSOCIATES Casey A. Moore, P.E. Gary R. McNaughton, P.E., PTOE John J. Mitchell, P.E. Christopher J. Williams, P.E. John F. Yacapsin, P.E. TO: Judy Dye, P.E., Assistant City Engineer City of Palm Beach Gardens FROM: John P. Kim, P.E., PTOE, Senior Project Manager McMahon Associates, Inc. SUBJECT: Parking Study - LDR Amendment Review McMahon Project No. M06344.04 DATE: May 10, 2007 McMahon Associates, Inc. (McMahon) has reviewed documentation and the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Kimley -Horn Associates, Inc., dated April 2007 for the Land Development Regulations Text Amendment. The applicant wishes to modify the City's code to reduce the number of parking spaces required for pharmacies with drive - through service windows from 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet to four (4). The City should consider the following given that the parking study is the basis for changing the City's Code: 1. The study was not performed in the heart of the peak season, but rather in the month of October which is the first month of the peak season for the City. Although Florida Department of Transportation peak season factors were used, these are relative to traffic volume patterns and do not necessarily translate to parking utilization for pharmacies. Performing the study during the month of December or January would be preferable to verify peak parking demand. 2. The study did not include any of the data collection used to determine the peak demand periods or values. Therefore, the study could not be thoroughly reviewed and cannot be approved. 3. There were three cases where two of the analyzed sites were across the street from one another. That is, the demand on each of the two was offset by the other. The data could be interpreted to reflect a much higher potential demand for one site if the other site were not across the street. AAA Boston PA Fort Washington I Exton I Mechanicsburg N,I Yardville FL Palm Beach Gardens I Fort Lauderdale I Fort Myers I Miami Parking Study - LDR Amendment Technical Memorandum May 10, 2007 . Page 2 The parking study cannot be approved unless all of the data is included and reviewed by McMahon. Note also that the average parking supply ratios of the sites included within the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation data for Pharmacy /Drugstore with Drive - Through Window, which was included as an appendix to the parking study, was 4.9 spaces per 1,000 square for the 11 sites studied. This is consistent with the City's current parking requirement of 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have concerning this review. JPK /jth cc: Trent Ebersole, P.E., Senior Project Manager F: \FL \06344M \06344M_04 - Parking Demand Study LDR Amendment\ Admin\ Parking Demand Study - LDR Amendment 0n0m.doc 0 • LP7 Kjmlej1 -� ...... and Associates, Inc. Memorandum To: John P. Kim, P.E., PTOE, McMahon Associates, Inc. From: Frederick W. Schwartz, P.I. Poorna I.. Bhattacharya, AICP Date: June 12, 2007 Re: Parking Demand Study — Response to McMahon Comments Palm Beach Gardens This memorandum provides our responses to the comments included in your technical memorandum to the City of Palm Beach Gardens dated May 10, 2007 along with additional information that you have requested. The information is • consistent with discussions in our meeting at City Hall yesterday. Comment 1 -- Date ofParking Counts The study was not performed in the heart of the peak season, but rather in the month of October which is the first month of the peak season for the City. Although Florida Department of Transportation peak season factors were used, these are relative to traffic volume patterns and do not necessarily translate to parking utilizations for pharmacies. Performing the study during the month of December or January would be Preferable to verify peak parking demand. The parking study was conducted in accordance with the methodology submitted to the City on October 6, 2006. Parking observations were performed on Friday, October 20, 2006 and Wednesday, October 25, 2006, which are still within the peak season. In order to account for the heart of the peak season, peak season conversion factors of 1.21 and 1.19 were applied to the counts taken on October 20, 2006 and October 25, 2006 respectively. Though these peak season conversion factors recommended by the Florida Department of Transportation apply for traffic counts, there is an underlying assumption that the traffic patterns are closely related to parking patterns. Roadway peak season conversion factors reflect the increase in roadway traffic due to the seasonal migration of residents to South Florida. As a result, it is assumed that the pharmacy, which is sales based, will also experience an increase in traffic. According to the Palm Beach County Trip Generation Rates, 40% of the . traffic generated by a pharmacy with a drive- through is pass -by traffic. Hence it can be reasonably assumed that the increase in traffic on the adjacent roadway will impact the parking demand during the peak season. TEL 561 845 0865 FAX 561 863 8175 4431 EmbemWem Me West Palm Beach, Fladda 33407 j Kimley -Horn i and Associates, Inc. John P. Kim, P.B., PTOB, Page 2 Peak season conversion factors are generally not available specifically for parking counts. In the absence of peak season data, FDOT peak season roadway adjustment factors were used, which we feel is appropriate and the best available data. Comment 2 — Absence ofRaw Data The study did not include any of the data collection used to determine the peak demand periods or values. Therefore, the study could not be thoroughly reviewed and cannot be approved. Aerial images of highest parking demand at each site for the two respective count dates were provided in the Appendix. of the Parking Demand Study. In addition, yesterday we gave you the requested support data in the form of a CD and a binder with aerial photos taken at half -hour increments from 11 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. on Friday, October 20, 2006 and Wednesday, October 25, 2006 for every site. Comment 3 — Proximity of Candidate Sites There were three cases where two of the analyzed sites were across the street from one another. That is the demand on each of the two was offset by the other. The data could be interpreted to reflect a much higher potential demand for one suite if the other site were not across the street. • It is agreed that there are three cases where two drug stores are located right across from each other, which includes the drug store pairs — C2 & W3, C5 & W4, and C6 & W5. However, if the maximum parking demand was determined after removing the six sites mentioned above, the resulting maximum parking demand would still remain the same since the calculation is based on the maximum observed parking demand and not the average demand. The results of removing the above mentioned six sites are shown in the following table. However, we believe that the other six sites are also good candidates .for the parking demand study. Due to the increase in the number of drug stores in the recent years, it is not uncommon to find drug stores located at very close proximity to each other. The observed maximum parking demand for the other six sites is also provided below for reference. As shown in the table, the maximum observed parking demand of 2.68 is very close to the maximum observed parking demand of 2.87 from the previous table. • Square Available Peak Parking Peak Season Max. Peak Peak Season Parking Demand Feet Parking Demand Parking Demand Rate (per 1,000 S.F.} 20-00-05 25-00-08 0 12 0 006 20-Oct-06 25-00,06 CVS 12,500 49 18 1 22 22 26 1.74 2.09 d100MBNa ry Traif CVS (C4) 91200 87 12 18 15 21 1.58 2.33 45W Donald Ross Road Waigreens (W2) 20 700 80 48 50 56 60 2.69 2.87 1800 W. Indiank»vn Rd. Maximum 2.69 2.87 However, we believe that the other six sites are also good candidates .for the parking demand study. Due to the increase in the number of drug stores in the recent years, it is not uncommon to find drug stores located at very close proximity to each other. The observed maximum parking demand for the other six sites is also provided below for reference. As shown in the table, the maximum observed parking demand of 2.68 is very close to the maximum observed parking demand of 2.87 from the previous table. • Kimley Hom _ and A%oaates, Inc. John P. Kim, P.E., PT01i, Page 3 Comment 4 — Reference to TTE Parking Supply The parking study cannot be approved unless all of the data is included and reviewed by McMahon. Note also that the averageparking supply ratios of the sites included within the ITE Parking Generation data for Pharmacy /Drugstore with Drive - Through Window, which was included as an appendix to the Parking Study, was 4.9 spaces per 1,000 square feet for the 11 sites studied. This is consistent with the City's current parking requirement of 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. frE's Parking Generation report shows an average parking supply for the 11 drug is stores that were studied. It should be noted that this is not a recommendation of parking supply provided by ITE. It merely suggests that the drug stores that were studied at the national level have provided an average of 4.9 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA. It also shows that there is significant discrepancy with the average parking demand of 2.02 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA observed on a weekday. This is consistent with our observation that the parking supply required by the City is significantly higher than the maximum observed parking demand (2.87 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA) from the study of drug stores in Palm Bcach County. Additionally, parking supply does not have a direct correlation with parking demand since parking supply is usually based on policies adopted by respective municipalities. The existing Palm Beach Gardens requirement of 5.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA has remained unchanged since at least 1995. Due to the recent proliferation of drug stores in recent years and the incorporation of drive -thru service in recent years, the actual parking demand of such uses is not as intense on a per square foot basis as in the mid 1990s. Should you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact either Poorna or myself at 561 -845 -0665. • PA1440 \63000TEIG comments \061207 McMahon memo.doc Square Available Peak Parking Peak Season Max. Peak Peak Season Parking Demand Feet Parking Demand Parking Demand Rate (per 1,000 S.F.) 20- Oct-06 23.00-06 ' jumv. 20.Oct -08 25-0ct-06 CVS (Q) 12,500 61 23 22 28 26 2.23 2.09 573 W. Indlantown Rd cvs (CS) 14,000 91 11 13 13 15 0.95 1.11 3188 NoMiake WWI. US (C6) 11,000 61 18 15 22 18 1.98 1.62 312 N. Uka Blvd. Waigreens (iN3) 18,000 75 28 33 34 39 1.88 2.18 439 W. Indiantm" Rd. Walgreens (W4) 18,600 70 28 30 34 36 1.83 1.93 3083 No"ka 8W. Walgreens (W$) 12,000 49 23 27 28 32 2.32 2.66 230 us Highway 1 maximuml 2.32 2.68 Comment 4 — Reference to TTE Parking Supply The parking study cannot be approved unless all of the data is included and reviewed by McMahon. Note also that the averageparking supply ratios of the sites included within the ITE Parking Generation data for Pharmacy /Drugstore with Drive - Through Window, which was included as an appendix to the Parking Study, was 4.9 spaces per 1,000 square feet for the 11 sites studied. This is consistent with the City's current parking requirement of 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. frE's Parking Generation report shows an average parking supply for the 11 drug is stores that were studied. It should be noted that this is not a recommendation of parking supply provided by ITE. It merely suggests that the drug stores that were studied at the national level have provided an average of 4.9 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA. It also shows that there is significant discrepancy with the average parking demand of 2.02 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA observed on a weekday. This is consistent with our observation that the parking supply required by the City is significantly higher than the maximum observed parking demand (2.87 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA) from the study of drug stores in Palm Bcach County. Additionally, parking supply does not have a direct correlation with parking demand since parking supply is usually based on policies adopted by respective municipalities. The existing Palm Beach Gardens requirement of 5.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA has remained unchanged since at least 1995. Due to the recent proliferation of drug stores in recent years and the incorporation of drive -thru service in recent years, the actual parking demand of such uses is not as intense on a per square foot basis as in the mid 1990s. Should you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact either Poorna or myself at 561 -845 -0665. • PA1440 \63000TEIG comments \061207 McMahon memo.doc MCOcMAHON McA1 1 FN ASSOCIATES, INC. 6360 NW 5`" Way I Suite 3001 I Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 p 954- 771 -0776 1 if 954- 771 -1754 `_ ' • ' • www.mcmtrans.com • PRINCIPALS Joseph W. McMahon, P.E. Rodney P. Plourde, Ph.D., P.E. Joseph J. DeSantis, P.E., PTOE John S. DePalma TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM William T. Steffens ASSOCIATES Casey A. Moore, P.E. TO: James Orth, P.E., Assistant City Engineer Gary R. McNaughton, P.E., PTOE City f Palm Beach Gardens John J. Mitchell, P.E. y Christopher J. Williams, P.E. John F. Yacapsin, P.E. FROM: John P. Kim, P.E., PTOE, Senior Project Manager McMahon Associates, Inc. SUBJECT: Parking Study — LDR Amendment Review McMahon Project No. M06344.04 DATE: June 15, 2007 CC: Dan Clark, P.E., City Engineer McMahon Associates, Inc. (McMahon) has reviewed the supplemental materials submitted by Kimley -Horn Associates, Inc., on June 11, 2007. The applicant wishes to modify the City's Land Development Code (LDR) to reduce the number of parking spaces required for pharmacies with • drive - through service windows from five (5) parking spaces per 1,000 square feet to four (4). A study was performed at the very beginning of the peak season for the City of Palm Beach Gardens. Data collection during the heart of the peak would have been preferable; however, the request to reduce the number of required parking spaces appears to be reasonable and should not cause parking problems. The City should condition the first five (5) future applicants who design their parking based on this reduced rate to perform a parking accumulation study during the months of December or January, after the site has been in operation for at least one (1) year. Failure to do so should result in a revocation of the certificate of occupancy. The parking studies for the first five (5) sites will be used to determine the impacts of the reduced parking rate. The request can be approved with the aforementioned condition of approval or as determined by the City of Palm Beach Gardens. Kimley Horn Associates, Inc. is advised that McMahon will require a methodology meeting for all future parking studies. This is required to ensure that the methodology and format of future parking studies will be acceptable. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have concerning this review. JPK FAFL \06344M \06344M_04 - Parking Demand Study LDR Amendment \Admin \Parking Demand Study - LDR Amendment 061507.doc • MA Boston RA Fort Washington I Exton I Mechanicsburg NJ Yardville Fl. Palm Beach Gardens I Fort Lauderdale I Fort Myers I Miami Date Prepared: June 18, 2007 1 ORDINANCE _, 2007 4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM 5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO 6 THE PALM BEACH GARDENS CODE OF ORDINANCES BY 7 AMENDING CHAPTER 78, "LAND DEVELOPMENT," ARTICLE V, 8 "SUPPLEMENTARY DISTRICT REGULATIONS," DIVISION 9, "OFF - 9 STREET PARKING AND LOADING," SECTION 78 -3 "NUMBER OF 10 PARKING SPACES REQUIRED," TABLE 33, UIRED OFF - 11 STREET PARKING SPACES," TO ESTABLISH ING RATE FOR 12 DRUGSTORE OR PHARMACY, GENERAL, IVE- THROUGH 13 SERVICE; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATIO N OVIDING AN 14 EFFECTIVE DATE. 15 16 WHEREAS, Section 78 -345, Table 33 of Chapter 78 of th ty's Code of 17 Ordinances, entitled "Required Off - Street Parking Spaces," establishes a ing rate of 18 one (1) parking space per 200 gross square feet of area for "Drugstore Pharmacy, 19 General" uses, as defined in said Chapter, within the City; and 20 21 WHEREAS, said Section d ntain a specific parking rate for drugstores 22 or pharmacies that contain drive -thr and hr 23 WHEREAS, the City has recei XCR A- 07 -04- 000014) from Brian 0 Cheguis of Cotleur & Hearing, Inc.alf of el Prince, Applicant, for an 26 amendment to the City's Land Develoulations to establish a parking rate for 27 drugstores or pharmacies with drivservice for consistency with parking 28 demand observed for such uses within Cl nd its surrounding areas; and 29 30 he Growth Management Department has reviewed said application, 31 has d fined t sufficient, and has recommended its approval; and 32 33 EREAS, this -, d Development Regulations amendment petition (LDRA -07- 34 01 -000 was review° y the Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board at a public 35 hearing o 10, 2007, hich recommended its approval by a vote of _ -_; and 36 37 WHER h t Council has determined that adoption of this Ordinance is in 38 the best interest o sidents of the City of Palm Beach Gardens. 39 40 41 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 42 OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA that: 43 44 SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and ratified. 45 i� U 1 OK 4 5 6 L 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 • Date Prepared: June 18, 2007 Ordinance 2007 SECTION 2. Section 78 -345, Table 33 of Chapter 78 of the City's Code of Ordinances entitled "Required Off - Street Parking Spaces" is hereby amended to establish a parking rate for "Drugstore or Pharmacy, General," uses, as defined in said Chapter, that contain drive - through service as follows (deleted language is stF+skeR thFough; new language is underlined): SECTION 3. Codification of this Ordinance is hereby authorized and directed. SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall 2 immediately upon adoption. le is intentionally left blank] i i 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 PASSED this day of PASSED AND ADOPTED this second and final reading. CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS BY: Joseph R. Russo, Mayor AT' API LE( David Levy, Vice Mayor Date Prepared: June 18, 2007 Ordinance _, 2007 , 2007, upon first reading. day of , 2007, upon FOR AGAINST ABSENT Christine P. Tatum, City Attorney 3 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING, ZONING & APPEALS BOARD Agenda Cover Memorandum • Date Prepared: June 20, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PUD -04 -03 • 11 Subject/Agenda Item: PUD- 04 -03: Legends at the Gardens MXD PUD Amendment Public Hearing & Recommendation to City Council: A request by Don Hearing of Cotleur & Hearing, on behalf of Joel Prince, to allow for an amendment to the Legends at the Gardens Mixed - Use Planned Unit Development (PUD) and a major conditional use for a drugstore. The applicant is proposing to amend the master site plan to allow for the development of a 14,729 square -foot drugstore building with a drive- through (Walgreens) and an 11,200 square -foot general office building on an approximately 3.82 -acre site. The 21.72 -acre subject PUD is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Central Boulevard and Donald Ross Road. [X] Recommendation to APPROVE with 4 waivers [ ] Recommendation to DENY Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: FINANCE: N/A PZAB Action: Growth [ ] Approved Planning Management: Costs: $ N/A [ ] APP. w/ conditions Manager Brad Wiseman Pro ect I M Total Denied [ ] Manager [ J Rec. approval City Richard Marrero $ N/A [ ] Rec. app. w/ conds. Attorney Planner Current FY [ ] Rec. Denial Christine Ta [X] Quasi — Judicial [ ]Continued Fina [ ] Legislative Funding Source: to: Ketty Labossiere, ]Public Hearing Attachments: Accountant [ ] Operating 8 Development Advertised: Palm Beach Post [X] Other NA • Project Narrative • Site Plan and Compliance Bahareh Wolfs, AICP June 29, 200 Details [X] Required • Landscape Plan Budget Acct. #: and Details Growth Manage N/A • Elevations and Administrator Floor Plans Kara Irwin, AIC • Ordinance 7, 2003 • Conditional Use Approved By: Analysis Ronald M. Ferris • Parking Demand Study Affected Parties: [X] Notified • Parking City Manager [ ] Not Required Contingency Plan • Project Application • Photometric Plan Date Prepared: June 20, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PUD -04 -03 -Page 2 - BACKGROUND • n March 6 2003 the City Council adopted Ordinance 7 2003 which approved the Legends at the O Y p pp g Gardens Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (PUD). The master plan provided for the development of 19,375 square feet of professional office use, 19,375 square feet of Neighborhood Commercial (CN) use, 186 multi - family dwelling units, a cabana house, and a swimming pool on a 21.72 -acre site. Per Ordinance 7, 2003, adopted on March 6, 2003, the approved site plan for the commercial neighborhood portion of the PUD consists of one building, which includes 19,375 square feet of retail use on the first floor and 19,375 square feet of professional office use on the second floor. Currently, the applicant is requesting approval for a PUD amendment to allow for a major conditional use for a 14,729 square -foot two -story drugstore building with a drive- through ( Walgreens) and an 11,200 square -foot two -story general office building in -lieu of the previously approved 38,750 square feet of non - residential uses. Approval of the subject petition would supercede the existing approved site plan. LAND -USE & ZONING The subject site is currently zoned Mixed -Use (MXD)/Planned Unit Development (PUD) and has a future land -use designation of Mixed -Use (MXD), and is designated Residential Medium (RM) on the Vision Plan. • CONCURRENCY The applicant received concurrency approval for the proposed development plan of 19,375 square feet of commercial retail, 19,375 of office use, and 186 multi - family units on August 27, 2002. The build -out date for the project was December 31, 2004. The applicant received an administrative time extension to extend the build -out date to December 31, 2007. The applicant has submitted a revised traffic impact equivalency analysis based on the proposed development plan, which has been reviewed and accepted by the City Engineer and Palm Beach County. PROJECT DETAILS The applicant is requesting approval for a PUD amendment to develop a 14,729 square -foot two - story Walgreens drugstore (major conditional use) and an 11,200 square -foot two -story office building. Master Site Plan The commercial building and the residential development share an access off of Central Boulevard. The drugstore and the two -story office building are situated in the southwest corner of the site and 40 are buffered from Donald Ross Road and Central Boulevard by a 100 -foot upland preserve area. Date Prepared: June 20, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PUD -04 -03 -Page 3 - According to Section 78 -159, Permitted, Conditional, and Prohibited Uses, a general drugstore or pharmacy is a major conditional use in the Commercial Neighborhood (CN) zoning district. Therefore, the applicant has submitted a conditional use analysis based on the criteria provided for in the LDRs. This analysis has been reviewed and rejected by staff (please see attached). Conditional Use Analysis It is staffs professional opinion that all the criteria in the conditional use analysis have been adequately justified (please see attached conditional use analysis). The applicant has demonstrated a compatible design with the adjacent uses and has also mitigated the potential adverse impacts of the drugstore and drive- through in the proposed site plan and architecture. The applicant has integrated landscaping, enclosed trash compactors, bollard -type lighting, and large sidewalks to buffer the commercial uses from the residential section of the PUD and keep the residential nature of the site intact. The applicant has followed the direction of staff and the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board to ensure safe and efficient circulation, parking and pedestrian connectivity. The utilities are proposed to be located underground, which will further mitigate potential impacts to the community. Community Design The commercial buildings are proposed to be similar in design and color to the residential buildings. All buildings on -site consist of a Spanish - Mediterranean architectural style. The architectural style is consistent with the residential buildings on -site. • Pedestrian Linkages The commercial site includes a cohesive pedestrian circulation system. Pedestrian connectivity is further enhanced between the residential and the non - residential areas of the site and to Central Boulevard through sidewalk and pathway connections. Also, the applicant has utilized decorative pavers throughout the commercial portion of the site to further enhance the connectivity areas between the two buildings. Wall Si ns The applicant is proposing a wall sign on the north and east elevations of the drugstore building, which each face a major right -of -way. Also, the applicant requests two additional principal tenant signs for the office building (two on the east elevation and one on the south elevation) in addition to the one allowed per Code. These requests require a waiver for the additional signage, since the building is only allowed one per City Code (please see waiver section). Currently, the two -story office building illustrations depicts three tenant signs above the first -floor line, one on the south elevation and two on the east elevation. The applicant has requested a waiver from the City Code to allow for two additional signs above the first -floor line (please see waiver section). • Date Prepared: June 20, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PUD -04 -03 -Page 4 - Directional SiQnage • The applicant is proposing two directional signs for the site which are consistent with City Code in PP P P g Y terms of number, size, and height. Monument Sign The applicant is requesting one monument sign located at the project's Donald Ross Road entrance, and is not proposing to utilize any tenant identifications on the existing monument sign at the entrance on Central Boulevard. The proposed monument sign does not meet the minimum 50 -foot setback from non right -of -way property lines as required by Code (please see waiver section). Landscaping /Bu(' erin The PUD is responsible for the landscaping, irrigation, and maintenance of the roadway shoulders and medians on Central Boulevard and Donald Ross Road, per condition of approval in Ordinance 7, 2003, which would be carried into the development order for this amendment. The buffers adjacent to Central Boulevard (eastern boundary) and Donald Ross Road (northern boundary) are 100 feet in width and incorporate preserve areas. This design is unchanged with this amendment. The applicant has provided a landscape island planted with Live Oaks for every three spaces, in lieu •of the required every nine spaces, adjacent to the residential property line. However, the applicant has requested a waiver from providing a landscape island for 10 spaces adjacent to the drugstore building (please see waiver section). Please note that a six -foot concrete wall exists between the residential and non - residential uses. Parking The current City Code requires that the proposed development plan provide 111 parking spaces for a general drugstore or pharmacy, however, the City Code does not take into account the presence of a drive- through for the pharmacy use. The applicant has submitted a parking demand study and has demonstrated to the satisfaction of staff that the current parking regulations are not consistent with observed parking demands for general pharmacy or drugstores with drive - through services (please see attached study). In addition to this petition, the applicant has also submitted a Land Development Regulation (LDR) amendment, processed concurrently with this petition, to allow for pharmacy with drive - through lanes to be parked at a ratio of one (1) space per two hundred fifty (250) square feet. Staff supports the proposed text amendment as submitted by the applicant. Please note that the City's traffic consultant, McMahon and Associates, does not raise any objections to the proposed text amendment (please see attached letter). Please note that if the applicant's text amendment (Petition LDRA- 07 -04- 000014) is not approved, the site subject site will be deficient 14 spaces. The applicant has submitted a contingency plan which requires the removal of the drugstore's drive - through lanes. Please note that staff has serious feconcerns of enforcing the removal of the drive - through lanes from an existing business. Date Prepared: June 20, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PUD -04 -03 -Page 5 - Drainage • The surface water J management system is under the jurisdiction of the South Florida Water g Management District (SFWMD) and Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District (NPBCID). The on -site drainage system consists of a series of catch basins and pipes, which direct run -off to the on -site lake located in the residential portion of the PUD. CPTED Compliance Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design ( CPTED) is a branch of situational crime prevention, which has its basic premise that the physical environment can be changed or managed to produce behavioral effects that will reduce the incident and fear of crime. The Police Department has reviewed the master site plan and has provided staff with several comments pertaining to security on -site and adherence to the principles of CPTED (please see conditions of approval). CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Property is classified as a residential MXD; therefore, it is required to comply with the residential MXD intensity measures established in Policy 1.1.1.3. of the City Comprehensive Plan and reiterated in Section 78- 157(g) of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDR's). •Policy 1.1.1.3. of the City's Comprehensive Plan requires that at least 51 percent of the gross square footage of the Commercial use within a non- residential MXD be contained in buildings having a two -(2) story character containing some actual two (2) story space. The proposed site plan is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policy 1.1.1.3., as the commercial neighborhood uses (Waigreen's building) are contained in a building with actual two -story space. Waivers The previously approved Planned Unit Development (PUD) included the following five waivers: (* Indicates waiver specific to the commercial site) APPROVED WAIVERS PER ORDINANCE 7, 2003 Code Section Required Provided Waiver Section 78 -285 Signage Maximum of one sign face per 2 1 development Section 78- 154(g)(7) Minimum Development Area Min of 50 acres 21.72 28.28 acres Section 78- 344(1)(1) Parking Stall and 10'x 18.5' stall Bay Dimensions dimensions 9' x 18.5' 1 foot* 0 Date Prepared: June 20, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PUD -04 -03 -Page 6 - 78 -252 Upland Preserve Mitigation Min. of 25% Waiver Code Section Required viable upland 2.55 2.79 acres Number preservation on- mitigated off -site site Section 78 -285 Signage Section 78- 157(f) Residential MXD Non vertical 1 signs Intensity Measures and Special integration of the none No vertical Definitions o min. 20% RH integration land allocation The applicant is requesting approval of the following four waivers: RE USTED WAIVERS WITH THIS APPLICATION Waiver Code Section Required Provided Waiver Staff Number Rec Section 78 -285 Signage Walgreens 1 signs 1 ( Walgreens Building & One per building Bldg - 1 Approve Office Bldg) Sign Section 78 -285 Signage 2 signs Cannot be located ( Walgreens) 1 sign 2 above the second 1 sign Approve floor line (office 1 sign building) Section 78 -285 Signage Min. 50 foot 3 setback from non- 15' setback 35' Approve ROW property lines 78 -315 Landscaping and One landscape 10 spaces in 4 Screening for Vehicular island every nine 1 space Approve Areas spaces a row Waiver Criteria: Section 78 -158 (1). Criteria. A request for the City Council to approve a waiver from one or more of the standards and requirements applicable to a planned development, PUD, or PCD shall comply with a majority of the criteria listed below. 1. The request is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. The request is consistent with the purpose and intent of this section. 3. The request is in support of and furthers the city's goals, objectives, and policies to establish developments possessing architectural significance, pedestrian amenities and linkages, employment opportunities, reductions in vehicle trips, and a sense of place. 4. The request demonstrates granting of the waiver will result in a development that exceeds one or more of the minimum requirements for PUDs. 5. The request for one or more waivers results from innovative design in which other minimum standards are exceeded. • 6. The request demonstrates that granting of the waiver will result in preservation of valuable Date Prepared: June 20, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PUD -04 -03 -Page 7 - natural resources, including environmentally - sensitive lands, drainage and recharge areas, • and costal areas. 7. The request clearly demonstrates public benefits to be derived, including but not limited to such benefits as no -cost dedication of rights -of -way, extensions of pedestrian linkages outside of the project's boundaries, preservation of important natural resources, and use of desirable architectural, building, and site design techniques. 8. Sufficient screening and buffering, if required, are provided to screen adjacent uses from adverse impacts caused by a waiver. 9. The request is not based solely or predominantly on economic reasons. 10. The request will be compatible with existing and potential land uses adjacent to the development site. 11. The request demonstrates the development will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this section, and that such waiver or waivers will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. Waiver Analysis: (1) Waiver from LDR Section 78 -285, Signage, states that each principal tenant is allowed a flat/wall sign. Staff Anlaysis: The applicant is requesting a waiver to the signage regulations in the Code, which limit buildings to one tenant sign that is set below the second floor line of the building. The applicant is requesting one additional principal sign for the Walgreens building (east elevation). The applicant has agreed to reduce the signage on the east elevation of the Walgreens building by twenty -five percent (25 %) of the size of the signage on the north elevation, as depicted on the elevations (please see attached elevations). Staff recommends APPROVAL of the additional Walgreens sign. (2) Waiver from LDR Section 78 -285, Signage, limits the location of signage on a building to the area below the second floor line. Staff Anal: Although the Code does not specifically limit the height of principal tenant signs, it has been staffs policy to limit the height of all signage to the first -story unless otherwise approved by City Council. Staff has reviewed the proposed location of the principal tenant/building ID for the Walgreens and office building sign, and is of the opinion of staff that the signage location is consistent with other signage recently approved by the City. Staff recommends APPROVAL of the waiver request. (3) Waiver from LDR Section 78 -285, Signage, requires that non - residential monument signs shall be setback from non right -of -way property lines by a minimum of fifty feet. It is staffs professional opinion that the request for the reduced setback for the non - residential monument sign be granted because it would be difficult for vehicular traffic to see the monument sign if it were setback at the required distance. The sign will be adjacent to an FPL substation and will not have negative impacts on the surrounding area. Furthermore, the applicant is permitted one sign per Code and staffs opinion is that although the sign is • located closer to the right -of -way than allowed, the sign is placed in the most suitable Date Prepared: June 20, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PUD -04 -03 -Page 8 - location on the site. Staff recommends APPROVAL of the waiver request. • (4) Waiver from Section 78 -315, Landscaping and Screening for Vehicular Areas, requires one landscape island every nine parking spaces. The applicant has provided ten spaces in a row in one location along the eastern facade of the drugstore building. In -lieu of the required nine spaces with an island in this location, the applicant has provided landscape islands for every three spaces along the southern property line between the residential and the commercial to further increase the aesthetics between the two uses. Please also note that ten landscape islands would normally be required and the applicant is proposing a total of fifteen landscape islands. Staff recommends APPROVAL of the waiver request. The proposed waivers are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the intent of the Land Development Regulations. It furthers the City's goal to have mixed -use developments that benefit the surrounding areas and incorporate additional architectural design considerations to improve the aesthetics and compatibility with the adjacent developments. Staff supports these requested waivers because the applicant has demonstrated consistency with Section 78 -158 of the LDRs, Waivers to Planned Development District Requirements, which states, "The use of innovative and creative techniques and concepts may require one or more waivers to the development standards applicable to such projects. The City Council may grant one or more of the requested waivers, provided community benefits such as architectural design, pedestrian amenities... are demonstrated. " In this case, the applicant has provided increased architectural details and enhanced landscape plans within the proposed project that provide increased • compatibility and continuity with the adjacent residential portion of the PUD and the surrounding area. Overall, the proposed site plan has been enhanced through the use of waivers to the City's development standards, and maintains the City's high development standards. PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD fPZAB) The Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board (PZAB) reviewed the subject petition at a public hearing on September 27, 2005 and as a workshop item on March 14, 2006, and the PZAB requested the applicant to address the following comments (staffs responses are in italics): 1. The PZAB stated that it was concerned with the one -way traffic going against the drive -thru traffic between the drugstore building and the office building. The applicant has revised the configuration of the parking area between the Walgreens and the two -story office building to provide a one -way circulation pattern for all traffic. 2. The PZAB stated that the possibility of angled parking be explored in order to improve circulation throughout the site. The applicant has revised the parking configuration and has provided angled parking along the eastern facade of the two -story office building. 3. The PZAB stated that the buffer between the residential and the commercial uses appeared to be inadequate. The applicant has provided 17 foot tall or better Live Oak tress instead of the Gumbo Limbo trees. The applicant and the City Forester have determined that the Live • Oak trees will provide a thicker canopy and buffer the residential portion of the project Date Prepared: June 20, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PUD -04 -03 -Page 9 - . much more effectively. 4. The PZAB stated that it would not support the waiver for nine -foot wide parking spaces. The applicant has revised the site plan to reflect nine and a half foot wide space as well as ten foot wide spaces throughout the subject site. 5. The PZAB stated that it did not support any additional signage other than what was already approved for the project along Central Boulevard. The applicant has revised the plans to reflect that the monument sign is placed on the northern property line of the subject site along Donald Ross Road. 6. The PZAB stated it had concerns with the architecture of the buildings. The applicant has revised the plans to reflect to incorporate the use of decorative tower elements on the Walgreen's building and further enhanced the fenestration of the windows and doorways of the office building. 7. The PZAB stated that the landscaping needed to be increased throughout the site. The applicant has revised the plans to include increased foundation plantings around the buildings as well as the utilization of Live Oak trees throughout the landscape islands on the subject site. STAFF RECOMMENDATION • Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the Legends at the Gardens Planned Unit Development (PUD- 04 -03) with the conditions and waivers maintained from the previously approved development order, as well as the following additional conditions: Conditions o Approval: Prior to scheduling for City Council: 1. Prior to scheduling for City Council, the Applicant shall submit a revised photometric plan that demonstrates conformance with the City's lighting codes. (Planning & Zoning) 2. Prior to scheduling of City Council, the Applicant shall provide documentation demonstrating the areas designated as open space for the property in CAD format on CD- ROM. The CAD file will contain the DWG, DXF, and DGN file extensions in version 2004 or earlier. The CAD file shall contain a separate layer for each of the following categories: property boundary, impervious areas, pervious areas, and areas designated as open space. Open space shall further be separated into lake tracts, preserve areas, perimeter buffers, easements, recreation area, and open space used in the calculation or required landscape points. Each layer shall be clearly labeled using the categories listed above. All drawings shall be defined as closed polygons. (City Forester) 3. Prior to the scheduling of City Council, the Applicant shall revise the site plan Open Space Calculations Table and the Site Data Table to accurately demonstrate the amount of area for • buildings, open space, pervious and impervious areas. (City Forester) 4. Prior to the scheduling of City Council, the Applicant shall revise the site plan and the Date Prepared: June 20, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PUD -04-03 -Page 10 - . landscape plan to demonstrate that the air conditioning units for the office building are located on the roof of the building, not in the landscape buffer behind the building. (Planning & Zoning) Landscaping and Maintenance 5. Prior to the issuance of the first permit for vertical construction on the commercial portion of the site, the Applicant shall erect and maintain barriers to protect the preserve areas. (City Forester) 6. Prior to the issuance of the clearing permit for the commercial portion of the site, fencing with opaque screening shall be placed around the south side of the property to the satisfaction of the city staff, so as to secure the area, and control dust and debris. (Planning & Zoning 7. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for vertical construction for the commercial portion of the site, funds shall be placed in escrow, or a surety bond provided, for an amount equal to 110% of the estimated cost for landscaping. (City Forester) 8. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the commercial portion of the site, the Applicant shall remove all prohibited and invasive non - native plants from the site. Once all removal work has been completed, the Applicant shall work with the City Forester to install native material within the preserve to reasonably fill in gaps left from the removal of exotic vegetation. (City Forester) • Transportation 1 Traffic Concurrency 9. The Applicant shall comply with any and all Palm Beach County Traffic Division conditions as outlined in the PBC Traffic Division equivalency and concurrency approval letters. (City Engineer) Police Department & Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) 10. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for each building, lighting locations and building addresses shall not conflict with landscaping, including long -term tree canopy growth. (Police Department) 11. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the drugstore and office buildings, the Applicant shall provide a timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting above or near entryways and adjacent sidewalks for said building. (Police Department) 12. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the drugstore building, all entry doors shall be equipped with a metal plate over the threshold of locking mechanism and case hardened deadbolt locks on all exterior doors with minimum one (1) inch throw; door hinges on the interior side of each door, and the main entries to the drugstore building shall be wired for closed- circuit digital camera surveillance system. (Police Department) 13. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for each building with an elevator, elevator cab interiors which are not completely visible when door is open, shall have shatter . resistant mirrors placed in a location approved by the Police Department. (Police Department) Date Prepared: June 20, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PUD -04 -03 -Page I 1 - • 14. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, non - residential buildings with a total square footage of at least 10,000 square feet shall have roof top numbers placed parallel to the addressed street, only visible from the air. The numerals should be white blocked lettered, weather resistant material, four feet in height and 18 inches wide. (Police Department) 15. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for each non - residential building, interior stairwells doors shall have glazing vision panels, five inches wide by 20 inches in height. Areas beneath stairways at ground level shall be fully enclosed. Fully enclosed stairways with solid walls shall have shatter resistant mirrors at each level and landing placed to provide visibility around corners. (Police Department) 16. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant shall submit a construction site security and management plan for review and approval by the Police Department. Noncompliance with the approved security and management plan may result in a stop -work order for the Legends at the Gardens PUD. (Police Department) Non - Residential: 17. The applicant shall construct the development in accordance with Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles, which consist of the following: (Police): (a) Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (including long -term tree growth); (b) A timer A timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting shall be installed above • or near entryways to residences and all sidewalks; (c) Street and pedestrian walkways shall use lighting that is no greater than 14 feet in height; and (d) Numerical addresses shall be illuminated for nighttime visibility, shall have bi- directional visibility from the roadway, shall not be obstructed, and shall be a minimum of six inches in height; and (e) Building address numbers shall be a minimum of 12" Arabic numerals. Drug store/ Pharmacy (Additional to previous non - residential requirements): 18. Non -glare building lighting shall be places around the perimeter on all building sides and on pedestrian walkways, yet shall be sensitive to the residential development within the planned unit development. 19. Glass perimeter doors shall be equipped with case hardened guard rings to protect the mortise lock cylinder. 20. Rear door shall have 180- degree peephole or security window. 21. Dumpster locations shall not allow for easy concealment, nor create blind spots or hiding areas. 22. Mail boxes shall be placed in a high activity and conspicuous location for enhanced safety and natural surveillance of users. 23. Landscaping shall not obstruct view of windows, building address numbers, and walkways. • Date Prepared: June 20, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PUD -04 -03 -Page 12 - Engineering 24. The Applicant shall copy to the City all permit applications, permits, certifications and approvals for the commercial portion of the site. (City Engineer) 25. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit for the commercial portion of the site, the Applicant shall provide cost estimates in accordance with LDR Section 78 -309 and 78 -461 and for on -site project improvements, not including public infrastructure, or landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the City. The cost estimates shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and landscape architect registered in the state of Florida and shall be posted with the City, prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit. (City Engineer) 26. Prior to issuance of the first building permit for the commercial portion of the site, the Applicant shall submit signed, sealed and dated construction plans (paving, grading & drainage and water& sewer) and all pertinent calculations for review and comment. (City Engineer) 27. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for vertical construction of the commercial portion of the site, documents identifying the cross access and maintenance agreement and restrictions as necessary shall be furnished by the applicant to the City Attorney for review and approval prior to such documents being recorded in the Public Records of Palm Beach County. (City Engineer) 28. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first building permit for vertical construction of the commercial portion of the site, the Applicant shall provide written • authorization from the appropriate utility companies approving landscaping and light poles within their utility easements. (City Engineer) 29. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first building permit for the commercial portion of the site, the Applicant shall provide a drainage plan with calculations for the project as shown on the master plan. Said drainage plan and calculations shall accommodate the ultimate design with pavement sections as proposed. (City Engineer) 30. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first building permit for the commercial portion of the site, the Applicant shall schedule a pre - permit meeting with City staff. (City Engineer) 31. The Applicant shall provide all necessary construction zone signage and fencing as required by the City Engineer. (City Engineer) 32. The construction, operation and/or maintenance of any elements of the subject project shall not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage of surrounding areas. If, at any time during the project development, it is determined by the City that any of the surrounding areas are experiencing negative drainage impacts caused by the project, it shall be the Applicant's responsibility to cure said impacts in a period of time and a manner acceptable to the City prior to additional construction activities. (City Engineer) 33. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the commercial portion of the site, the Applicant shall connect the proposed sidewalk to the existing sidewalk at the northwest corner of this project and obtain approval from Palm Beach County & the Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District (NPBCID). (City Engineer) 34. The Applicant shall be required to notify the City's Public Works Division via fax at least ten (10) working days prior to the commencement of any work/construction activity within • any public right -of -way within the City. In the case of a City right -of -way, the property Date Prepared: June 20, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PUD -04 -03 -Page 13 - owner has at least five (5) working days to obtain a right -of -way permit. Right -of -way permits may be obtained at the Building Division. Failure to comply with this condition may result in a stop -work order of all work/construction activity within the public right -of- way and the subject site. (Public Works) 35. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for the commercial portion of the site, the Applicant shall re -plat the commercial portion of the Legend at the Gardens to include all existing and proposed easements and like encumbrances, in accordance with LDR Section 78 -446 for City Council approval. (City Engineer and Planning & Zoning) 36. The Applicant shall comply with all Federal Environmental Protection Agency and State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection permit requirements for construction activities. (City Engineer) 37. Prior to the issuance of the first clearing permit for the commercial portion of the site, the Applicant shall provide construction plans, including, but not limited to, paving, grading, and drainage plans along with surface water management calculations and hydraulic pipe calculations for City review and approval. The paving, grading, and drainage plan and calculations shall be signed and sealed by an engineer licensed in the State of Florida. (City Engineer) Miscellaneous 38. All on -site lighting shall be cast downward and shielded from adjacent properties. (Planning & Zoning) 39. If the Applicant is proposing Art in Public Places on -site, and the art is not installed prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy or by the date included in the approved art resolution, the City shall have the option of withdrawing the escrow. (Planning & Zoning) 40. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for each building on the commercial portion of the site, all roof top mechanical equipment shall be screened from view. (Planning & Zoning) 41. At no time shall staging of construction vehicles and/or service vehicles occur within a public right -of -way. All vehicular construction activities shall use a construction access off of Donald Ross Road. (Planning & Zoning) 42. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall submit the property owner association documents for the City Attorney's review and approval. These property owner association documents shall reflect unity of control for all common areas within the PUD, including, but not limited to, parking, landscaping and drive aisles. (Planning & Zoning) 43. The Applicant shall coordinate and receive approval from the Growth Management Administrator prior to the closing of any public sidewalk. (Planning & Zoning) 44. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for vertical construction of the commercial portion of the site, digital files of the approved plat shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Division. Approved civil design and architectural drawings, including floor plans, shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the drugstore and office buildings. (GIS Manager, Development Compliance Officer) 45. The Applicant shall be required to notify the City's Public Works Division via fax at least ten (10) working days prior to the commencement of any work/construction activity within any public right -of -way within the City. In the case of a City right -of -way, the property Date Prepared: June 20, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: PUD -04 -03 -Page 14 - owner has at least five (5) working days to obtain a right -of -way permit. Right -of -way permits may be obtained at the Building Division. Failure to comply with this condition may result in a stop -work order of all work/construction activity within the public right -of- way and the subject site. (Public Works) 0 Wa /greens @ Legends at the Gardens by Joe/ Prince Site Plan Approval Project Narrative Introduction (Updated 2 -02 -2007) (Updated 5-08 -2007) (Updated 6 -11 -2007) The Applicant is requesting site plan approval for the 3.82 acre commercial site located within the approved Legends at the Gardens PUD in the City of Palm Beach Gardens. The site is situated on the southwest corner of Donald Ross Road and Central Boulevard. The applicant is proposing to finalize the buildout of the PUD by developing up to 27,929 square feet of commercial and office uses within two buildings. A two -story stand alone office building is proposed at the west end of the property, adjacent to a vertically integrated mixed use Retail and Office building. The mixed use building will incorporate up to 2,000 square feet of Professional Office on the second floor while the main floor shall integrate approximately 1,400 square feet of general pharmacy, and neighborhood serving retail use. Additionally the Petitioner is proposing a separate 1 1,200 square foot Professional Office building located adjacent to the Retail /Office building. The • residential portion of the PUD has been previously approved and is fully developed with one hundred and eighty-six (186) multi - family residential units at a gross density of 8.56 residential units to the acre which has been horizontally integrated into the subject site. The Commercial portion of the development was originally conditioned to include up to 39,500 square feet of Retail and Office uses. This petition is requesting up to 27,929 square feet of Retail and Office use (a reduction of up to 30% from the original development order approval) in keeping with the neighborhood commercial intensity serving the adjacent residents. The horizontal integration of the adjacent Residential use to the commercial site has been addressed by way of additional landscape buffering located between the subject site and the residential component, and the proposed site program respects these conditions (additional landscaping in buffers and additional tree islands in parking located along the southern boundary of the site). A comprehensive pedestrian sidewalk system has been incorporated into the site design from the adjacent residential portion of the PUD as well as from Central Boulevard and Donald Ross Road. The previously approved 1.4 acre on -site preserve area (comprising up to 36% of the gross site acreage) remains fully intact and unaffected as a part of this petition approval request. Moo /ficatiorrs to Pans ann'Petitiorr Since the last meeting with Staff in late December, the Applicant has made multiple modifications to the plans for the purpose of reducing waiver requests and improving the access to the site and reducing any off -site impacts for the adjacent residents. The modifications include the deletion of four (4) waiver requests: CITY OF PALM Orly GDNS JUN 12 2007 'G DIV LANINI ! & ZONIN Walgreens @ Legends At The Gardens Project Narrative 2 • Deletion of Waiver requesting additional light levels at the drive - through for security is purposes. Petitioner shall comply with Code maximum light levels of 10.0 foot candles in this area. • Deletion of Waiver requesting five (5) foot wide pedestrian connection to residential and adjacent right -of -way. Petitioner shall provide eight (8) foot wide sidewalk connections per Staffs request. • Deletion of Waiver requesting the use of the drive- through lanes as part of the required parking calculation for the purpose of meeting the on -site parking requirement. • Deletion of Waiver requesting removal of vertical integration of uses between retail and office uses. The Petitioner shall provide for a two (2) story office building totaling 11,200 square feet and will provide vertical integration of office use within the second (2nd) floor of the commercial building. This modification satisfies the requirements of 78- 157(f) Table 18 and will provide the integration of uses so desired by Staff for Mixed Use projects within the City. The Applicant is proposing a total of 2,000 square feet of Professional Office (1,588 s.f.), which includes the ADA required elevator and emergency egress stairway (412s.f.). Other modifications include the revision of landscaping to address the above referenced changes. The plans have been updated accordingly. Pro, ject History isThe overall 21.72 -acre site was comprised of two separate parcels (4.01 and 4.10) that had separate Future Land Use designations. Parcel 4.01 (located at the southwest corner of Donald Ross Road and Central Boulevard) was the subject of a Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Amendment that converted the approximate 8.19 -acre site from a Commercial (C) designation to mixed -use (MXD). Parcel 4.10 (adjacent to parcel 4.01) consisted of the remaining 13.53 acres of property and was already designated mixed -use (MXD) on the City's Future Land Use Map. Both parcels were zoned Planned Development Area (PDA), but now possess a Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning district designation. The original commercial designation for this site (prior to adoption of Ordinance 07, 2003) would have allowed up to 173,000 square feet of General Retail use which would have been required to park at 4 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of retail development. • Genera! Project Description The site, located on the southwest corner of Donald Ross Road and Central Boulevard, is generally square with an angular portion missing in the southeast corner of the site due to the shared driveway access from Central Boulevard which is shared with the adjacent residential dwellings located to the south. The site is adjacent to two major Palm Beach Gardens arterial roadways on the north and east boundaries. The 80 -100 foot wide parkway buffer and native upland preserve area created along the north and east boundaries of the development between Donald Ross Road and Central Boulevard, respectively have been integrated into the design as originally approved (no changes proposed). The west property line borders a Florida Power and Colleur& Hearing 2 1934 Commerce lane, Bide 1 Jup'ter, Ronda 33458 561 747 6336 Fax 747 1377 c �.n e n ,. a n•. Walgreens @ Legends At The Gardens Project Narrative 4 P Signs fo r ground floor rSignage ove first 285 table users to not be located Principal building W. w for 24 above second flo or line or and/or tenant signage ough above bldg. parapet above second floor perimeter preserve for line both prin ci al buildings PERMITTED SIGNAGE Relief of 35' Minimum 50 foot setback from required setback for from non -ROW property Requesting 15 foot safety and visibility Sect. 78 -285 table line setback from non- considerations adjacent to 24 ROW property line the preserve located to the west LANDSCAPING & SCREENING FOR VEHICULAR Landscape island Relief of one space from the requirement PARKING AREAS Sect. 78- 315(b) Landscape island required located at tenth parking space in one location due to the proposed every nine parking spaces on the site at the front of location and proximity to a large preserve and located in a row the principal building the additional islands provided adjacent to residential portion of the PUD Waiver justifications: • Waiver #1 Due to the existence of a significant preserve buffer between the commercial building and both Donald Ross Road and Central Boulevard, the request to raise the signage to the second story on architectural tower elements is appropriate to ensure the development is sufficiently recognized from both rights -of -way. Both buildings are located over 192 feet from Donald Ross Road and over 180 feet from Central Boulevard, further justifying the need to raise the signage to a height that will assist in identifying the site's commercial and office use principal tenants. Waiver #2 The reduction in the required setback for the sign is necessary for locating the identification signage in close proximity to the entrance so that eastbound traffic does not drive past the only point of entrance located on Donald Ross Road. This reduced setback is adjacent to a property that possesses a residential low underlying land use with an industrial use (FPL substation) and not any residential uses, therefore the off -site impacts are non - existent. This request will further the safety of drivers attempting to access the site while eastbound on Donald Ross Road as they will slow down and turn at the appropriate location to access the site. The existing condition was further exacerbated when the previous property owner (as part of the original PUD approval) dedicated right -of -way to the City for the right turn lane on Donald Ross Road which created an unusual property boundary angle at the northwest corner of the property. Cotteur 8 ►searing 4 1934 Commerce Lane, aide 1 Jupiter, Florida 33458 561 747 6336 Fax747 1377 F]Project Documents103 -0913 Walgreerts - Legends at the GardensWarrativeWatgreens6 -11 -2007 with Wafgreens @ Legends At The Gardens Project Narrative 5 Waiver #3 is requested due to the excessive buffering afforded to the two fronts of the project which incorporate both required landscape buffers and a minimum eighty (80) foot wide preserve area along these frontages. The request is for one row of parking located at the front of the commercial building to have up to ten (10) parking spaces in a row. The Petitioner has submitted this configuration to Staff on numerous iterations of the plan and it has been accepted due to the provision of numerous landscape islands located between the residential portion of the PUD and the subject site for the purpose of increasing the vegetative buffer between the two properties. The location of this requested waiver will have no on- or off -site impacts for surrounding property owners and /or passers -by. Surrounding Land Uses BOUNDARY EXISTING USE LAND USE ZONING NORTH Roadway /Abacoa DRI (FAU /Retail /Office) MXD (Town of Jupiter) MXD (Town of Jupiter) SOUTH RL / PUD (High School / Residential) RL / PUD P/I / PUD WEST FPL Substation / Preserve RL PDA EAST Mixed Use - MXD /C PUD Reta iVOffice /Residentia I Currently, the surrounding properties to the west are designated as preserve lands with a Florida Power and Light substation located due west of the property. Abacoa DR] within the Town of • Jupiter exists across Donald Ross Road to the north which consists of the Abacoa Plaza (retail shopping center, the Abacoa Golf Club and FAU Campus. The newly developed Don Ross Village is finalizing construction to the east across Central Boulevard and the Benjamin High School site to the south has been completed. • This request for site plan approval js consistent with the Land Development Regulations of the City of Palm Beach Gardens and with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Commercial and Professional Office development shall serve the surrounding residential developments located to the north (in Abacoa), the south and to the east. The Applicant has made significant site programming modifications to ensure the traffic circulation effectively moves users to their destinations and through the site. The architecture has been modified to present an attractive building facade for customers, clients and passers -by. The development incorporates vertically integrated office space within a commercial building with a two story configuration, and all uses can be sufficiently parked. Coueur 8 Fkanng 5 1934 Commerce lane, mite 1 Jupter. Ronde 33458 561 747 6336 Fax 747 137 • Wednesday, October 17, 2006 (Revised Tuesd, June 19, 2007) Walgreens @ Legends at the Gardens Conditional Use — Pharmacy Located in a Commercial Zoning District Introduction: Joel Prince, (the "Applicant ") is requesting a Conditional Use approval from City Council for the development of a 14,729 square foot general pharmacy. The pharmacy use will be integrated into a two story building that will also include 2,000 square feet of second floor Professional Office space. An additional 11,200 square feet of Professional Office use will be located in an adjacent two story building at the west side of the site. The actual area used for pharmacy purposes within the 14,729 square -foot building is less than 1,200 square feet. This request is necessary as general pharmacy uses are designated as a Conditional Use in the Neighborhood Commercial Zoning District. This site was originally designated to be a neighborhood commercial use at the time of the approval for the Master Plan for the part of the PUD associated with the Walgreens building. Project History: In 2003, the Legends at the Gardens Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development • (PUD) was approved by City Council. The master plan approved the development of 19,375 square feet of professional office use, 19,375 square feet of Neighborhood Commercial (CN) use, 186 multi - family dwelling units, a cabana house, and a swimming pool. The retail portion of the PUD consisted of a commercial building which included 19,375 square feet of retail use on the first floor and 19,375 square feet of professional office use on the second floor. The applicant has recently requested approval for an amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD), which consists of a 14,729 square foot retail building (Walgreens) with 2,000 square feet of Professional Office use on the second story and an 11,200 square -foot (2 story) general office building in lieu of the previously approved 38,750 square feet of non - residential uses. Pharmacy Use within the Donald Ross Corridor and Overlay: Staff, in a recent policy finding, has made the determination that the proposed use for the site, Walgreens, does not fit within the use -by -right Retail use for the PUD. Therefore the Applicant must request a conditional use to allow for General Pharmacy within the area designated as Neighborhood Commercial. As indicated above, Pharmacies are designated as Conditional Uses within the Neighborhood Commercial zoning category within the City of Palm Beach Gardens Land Development Regulations (Section 78- 159(1) Table 21), and therefore must be approved by City Council. Donald Ross Road exists as one of the City's principal east -west corridors and contains a wide range of land uses. At • • the location of the subject site, a Pharmacy is an appropriate use and is consistent with the mix of retail, professional office, and residential uses that exists in close proximity to the site. Conditional Use Criteria (1) Comprehensive plan. The proposed use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. This request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Pharmacy use is a primary need of the City's residents. There are no other pharmacies within this mixed use project. A pharmacy with retail uses will serve the adjacent residents and fulfill the neighborhood commercial intent of this portion of the PUD, as provided for in the City's Comprehensive Plan. (2) Chapter requirements. The proposed use is consistent with all applicable requirements of this chapter. The site plan for the proposed use has been presented to staff and the Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board. Staff has recommended approval for the plan and agreed that it is consistent with all requirements of the land development chapter of the code. (3) Standards. The proposed use is consistent with the standards for such use • as provided in section 78 -159. There are no specific standards associated with Pharmacy use within section 78- 159. (4) Public welfare. The proposed use provides for the public health, safety, and welfare by: a. Providing for a safe and effective means of pedestrian access; b. Providing for a safe and effective means of vehicular ingress and egress; c. Providing for an adequate roadway system adjacent to and in front of the site; d. Providing for safe and efficient onsite traffic circulation, parking, and overall control; and e. Providing adequate access for public safety purposes, including fire and police protection. Each of the above public welfare criteria has been met within the site plan. This includes (but is not limited to) over -sized sidewalks, bollard lighting, and complete vehicle circulation through out the site. The site plan for the proposed use has been presented to staff and the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board. Staff has supported approval for the site plan. The site will be parked to code with the recent submittal and pending approval of a zoning text amendment that will create a specific parking rate for drugstores or pharmacies within the City that contain drive - through service (please refer to staff report for Petition LDRA -07- • • 04- 000014 for more information regarding said zoning text amendment).. (5) Screening and buffering. The proposed use utilizes such techniques as landscaping, screening, buffering, site or building design, or business operation procedures to mitigate impacts on surrounding properties, including such impacts as: a. Noise; b. Glare; c. Odor; d. Ground -, wall -, or roof - mounted mechanical equipment; e. Perimeter, interior, and security lighting; f. Signs; g. Waste disposal and recycling; h. Outdoor storage of merchandise and vehicles; i. Visual impact; and j. Hours of operation. Screening and buffering have been provided around all elements of the proposed site which may become unsightly for the public, such as the dumpster, mechanical equipment surrounding the building, lighting and signage. It should be noted that all waste will be contained within a completely enclosed space that contains two (2) trash compactors. • (6) Utilities. The proposed use minimizes or eliminates the impact of utility installation, including underground and overhead utilities, on adjacent properties. All utilities are proposed to be underground for this project as noted on the site plan and engineering plans. (7) Dimensional standards. The proposed use meets or exceeds all dimensional requirements required by the chapter. All required setbacks and minimum lot dimensions have been met within the proposed site plan. This site plan has been reviewed and supported by City Staff. (8) Neighborhood plans. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, and standards of neighborhood plans. There is not a neighborhood plan for this area of the City. However, the Applicant did want to ensure that the residential tone within the PUD continued on this site. The master plan for the Legends at the Gardens was approved with +I- 38,750 square feet of neighborhood commercial use. The project was intended to have a use that would serve the residents of the neighborhood. Pharmacy use is a prime example of a commercial use that would best serve the community. is • (9) Compatibility. The overall compatibility of the proposed development with adjacent and area uses, and character of area development, The proposed development is compatible with each of the uses within the immediate area. The pharmacy building was designed to ensure that the architectural elements of the adjacent townhouses within the residential portion of the PUD played a large part within the building facades. Bollard type lighting, landscaping and large sidewalks were also planned to keep the residential nature of the site intact. However, it should be noted that the development is located on Donald Ross Road, a significant east -west corridor of Palm Beach Gardens. All of the development that fronts onto Donald Ross between Military Trail and Central Boulevard is commercial in nature. This includes a supermarket, a gym, gas stations, banks and other retail related businesses. (10) Patterns of development. The proposed use will result in logical, timely, and orderly development patterns. As mentioned previously, all of the property on Donald Ross Road has been built or is presently being built. As for the Legends at the Gardens Master Plan, this • will be the last phase of development. The non - residential component of the mixed use PUD was always designed, contemplated and approved at the corner location as presented. (11) Purpose and intent. The proposed use will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter and the goals, objectives, and policies of the city. The purpose and intent of this project is to provide a service and medically related goods to the residents within the residential portion of the Legends at the Gardens PUD and to other residents within the City. The Applicant believes that this goal is consistent with the purpose and intent of the Land Development Chapter of the code. (12) Adverse impact. The design of the proposed use and structures will minimize any adverse visual impacts or impacts caused by the intensity of the use. The intensity of the pharmacy use was taken into account when designing the structure for this project. The architect and other project team members have made an effort to assure the design of this project is consistent with the structures surrounding the property. The design elements for the structure were based on the residential units surrounding the site. Large landscape buffers were • . integrated into the site plan as well as a preserve area that sits adjacent to Donald Ross Road. (13) Environmental impact. The design of the proposed use minimizes any adverse impacts that may be created, including impacts on environmental and natural resources including air, water, stormwater management, wildlife, vegetation, and wetlands. The property on which the project will be developed has been previously reviewed and approved by the City Forester. Stormwater plans have been submitted for this site plan to the City's engineering consultant and approved. The site development for Pharmacy use will have a minimal environmental impact on the property. Conclusion: The proposed Pharmacy use is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, complies with the overall purpose and intent of the land development regulations and is compatible with existing surrounding land uses on the adjacent properties to the west, north and east of the site. The Applicant is requesting the approval of this request for Conditional Use • • CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Planning and Zoning Division Growth Management Department CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS 10500 North Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 (561) 799 -4243 Fax (561) 799 -4281 Request: _Planned Community Development (PCD) _Planned Unit Development (PUD) _Amendment to PCD, PUD or Site Plan _Conditional Use — Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan _Administrative Approval _Administrative Appeal Project Name: — Walgreen's - Legends at the Gardens _ Annexation —Rezoning .X .Site Plan Review _Concurrency Certificate _Time Extension _Miscellaneous _Other Date Submitted: Owner: Joel Prince Address: Applicant (if not Owner): Applicant's Address: Telephone No. Agent:- Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. Contact Person: _ Brian Chequis, Senior Land Planner E -Mail: bchequis @colteur- hearing.com Agent's Mailing Address: 1934 Commerce Lane, Suite 1, Jupiter Fl. 33458 Agent's Telephone Number: (561) 747 -6336 x 127 Fax Number: (561) 747 -1377 Petition Number: Fees Received pplication $ _ eceiut Number: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date & Time Received: ,3v JUN 12 Engineering $ SIN Architect: Marc Weiner Architects, Inc. Phone Number: (561) 750 -4111 • Engineer: Jeff H. Iravani, Inc. Phone Number: (561) 575 -6030 Planner: Brian Chequis / Cotleur & Hearing. Inc. Phone Number: (561) 747 -6336 x 127 DIV • • Landscape Architect: Donaldson Hearing /Cotleur & Hearing, Inc.Phone Number: (561) 747 -6336 x 120__ Site Information: Note: Petitioners shall submit electronic digital files of approved projects. See attachment for details. General Location: Soutwest comer of Donald Ross Road and Central Boulevard in Palm Beach Gardens Address: TBD - VACANT SITE Section: _ 25 Township: Property Control Number(s): 52- 42- 41- 25 -10- 001 -0000 Range: 42 Acreage: _ 2.26 acres Current Zoning: MXD Requested Zoning: MXD Flood Zone C Base Flood Elevation (BFE) — to be indicated on site plan, Current Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation: MXD Existing Land Use: _ VACANT Requested Land Use: Proposed Use(s) i.e. hotel, single family residence, etc.: PHARMACY & PROFESSIONAL OFFICE COMMERCIAL Proposed Square Footage by Use: 14,729 SF PHARMACY & 13,200 SF PROFESSIONAL OFFICE Proposed Number and Type of Dwelling Unit(s) i.e. single family, multifamily, etc. (if applicable): N/A TO THIS REQUEST Justification Information concerning all requests (attach additional sheets if needed.) { Section 78 -46, Application Procedures, Land Development Regulations) 1. Explain the nature of the request: SEE ATTACHED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT 2. What will be the impact of the proposed change on the surrounding area? SEE ATTACHED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT 3. Describe how the rezoning request complies with the City's Vision Plan and the following elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan — Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Infrastructure, Coastal Management, Conservation, Recreation and Open space, Intergovernmental Coordination and Capital Improvement. NOT APPLICABLE TO THIS REQUEST • 4. How does the proposed project comply with City requirements for preservation of natural resources and native vegetation (Section 78 -301, Land Development Regulations)? SEE ATTACHED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT 5. How will the proposed project comply with City requirements for Art in Public Places (Chapter 78- 261, Land Development Regulations)? SEE ATTACHED JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT • 6. Has project received concurrency certification? • THE PROPERTY RECEIVED CONCURRENCY ON AUGUST 27, 2002 • Date received: Legal Description of the Subiect Property (Attach additional sheets if needed) Or see attached deed for legal description. Location The subject property is located approximately _ 0 mile(s) from the intersection of Donald Ross Road & Central Blvd. , on the _ north, _east, X south, _west side of Donald Ross Road (street/road). • Statement of Ownership and Designation of Authorized Agent Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared who, being by me first duly sworn, on oath deposed and says: • 1. That he /she is the fee simple title owner of the property described in the attached Legal Description. 2. That he /she is requesting Site Plan within a Planned Unit Development in the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. 3. That he /she has appointed _ Brian Cheguis /Don Hearing - Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. _ to act as authorized agent on his/her behalf to accomplish the above project. Name of Owner: Joel Prince Signature of Owner _ 17 Central Parkway Street Address P. O. Box • Telephone Number By: Name/Title Stuart, Florida _ City, State, Zip Code City, State, Zip Code Fax Number • E -mail Address Sworn and subscribed before me this day of , My Commission expires: • Notary Public • L` Applicant's Certification I/We affirm and certify that I /we understand and will comply with the land development regulations of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. I/WE further certify that the statements or diagrams made on any paper or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of my /our knowledge and belief. Further, I /we understand that this application, attachments, and application filing fees become a part of the official records of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Flori n are not returnable. Applicant is: Siei atmr of A _Owner _ Brian Cheguis, Senior Land Planner Print Name of Applicant _Optionee _ 1934 Commerce Lane, Suite 1 Street Address _Lessee _Jupiter, Florida, 33407 City, State, Zip Code X, Agent _ (561) 747 -6336 x 127 Telephone Number _Contract Purchaser (561) 747 -1377 Fax Number _ bcheguisocotleur- hearinq.com E -Mail Address r� • CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD Agenda Cover Memorandum Date Prepared: June 18, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: MISC- 07 -01- 000022 Subiect/Agenda Item: Petition MISC- 07 -01- 000022 - PGA Financial Plaza Building Signage Waiver Recommendation to City Council: A request by Bertie Russo, agent, on behalf of Twenty - Fifth Palm Beach, LLC, for approval of a waiver to allow four tenant signs to be located above the second floor line of the northeast and southwest elevations of the PGA Financial Plaza Building (f.k.a. MacArthur Center Office Building), located at 3399 PGA Boulevard, within the Regional Center Development of Regional Impact (DRI). ] Recommendation to APPROVE [ X ] Recommendation to DENY Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Finance Dept.: Planning, Zoning, & Growth Management: N/A Appeals Board City Attorney: Project Allan Owens Action: Manager: Jackie Holl an, AICP Administrator [ ]Recommend Aprvl. Christine P. Tatum, Esq. Planner gu' counta t: [ ] Rec. Approval with/ Development Compliance: N/A conditions [ l Recommend Denial Bahareh K. Wolfs, AICP Ketty Labossiere [ ] Continued to: Principal Planner: [ X J Quasi - Judicial Fees Paid: [ X ] Yes [ J Legislative [ ] Public Hearing Todd Miller, AI Funding Source; Planning & Zoning Director; [ ]Operating [X] Other NA Talal M. Benothman, AICP Growth anagement Budget Acct. #: Attachments: Admi i ator: Advertised: No NA A - Applicant's Request 4 Date: Paper: w /photographs B — Location Map Ka Irwin, AICP [ X J Not Required C — Existing & Proposed Approved By: Signage City Manager: Public Notice: D - Resolution 21, 1998 [ ] Yes w /approved Site Plan & [ X ] Not required Elevations Ronald M, Ferris Date Prepared: June 18, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: MISC- 07 -01- 000022 • EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The subject petition is a waiver request from Section 78 -285 of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs) to allow the display of four tenant signs above the second -story floor line of the northeast and southwest elevations of the PGA Financial Center (f.k.a./ MacArthur Center Office Building). There are already two existing building identification signs with the words "Chase" and a "Chase" logo on these same elevations. It is staff's professional opinion that Section 78 -285, Table 24, "Flat/Wall Sign for Ground Floor Users," is intended to address signage for those retail tenants who are located on the ground floor and have separate entrances into retail buildings and commercial shopping centers. Staff typically has no objection to more than one building identification sign, when adequately justified, provided the signs have the same name and are for the same tenant. However, it is staff's professional opinion that multiple signs for different tenants on office buildings create an undesirable and cluttered appearance. Furthermore, it is staff's opinion that multiple signs for a multitude of tenants is contrary to the intent of the City's LDR regarding tenant signage. In addition, such signs constitute a form of advertising instead of providing a means of "way finding" to a particular destination. Therefore, staff does not support this waiver request. BACKGROUND On March 19, 1998, the City Council adopted Resolution 21, 1998, which approved the development of a four -story, 76,112 square -foot office building known as the MacArthur Center Office Building, located within the Regional Center DRI at 3300 PGA Boulevard. The approval included waivers pertaining to the 62 -foot building height, the front setback for the ground sign, and the location of the two existing building identification wall signs above the second floor line. LAND USE AND ZONING The subject site is within the Regional Center DRI and has a future land -use designation of Professional Office (PO). The zoning district classification is Planned Community District Overlay (PCD) with an underlying zoning of Professional Office (PO). SIGNAGE REQUEST The four tenant signs are proposed to be located between the second and third stories on the northeast and southwest elevations of the PGA Financial Plaza. In a letter dated May 16, 2007, the applicant discusses the reasons the application is in compliance with a majority of the criteria contained in Section 78- 158(1) of the City's LDR. (Please see Attachment A.) • In another letter dated April 24, 2007 (Attachment A) the applicant states the names of the future tenants are not known at this time. However, as leases expire, they wish to offer 2 signage identification buildings along PGA visibility from PGA businesses. Sign Details Date Prepared: June 18, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: MISC- 07 -01- 000022 to prospective tenants in order to be competitive with other office Boulevard. Furthermore, the applicant states there is a need for Boulevard, which would help promote and better market their The proposed signs consist of 24" high, internally illuminated, letters. The signs will match the color and font of the existing "Chase" building identification wall signs, which are white with blue channels or edges. Waiver Request: City Code Allowed Proposed Waiver Requested Staff Recommendation Section 78 -285, 1 per tenant space or 4 tenant wall signs To allow 4 tenant Denial (1) Table 24: bay. No maximum displayed between the signs displayed above Permanent number. 2 "d & 3 d stories of the the 2nd floor lines on Signs: northeast and the northeast and FlatMall Sign Signs shall not be southwest elevations southwest elevations for Ground located above second Floor Users floor line or above building parapet. Sign must face ROW or primary entrance. Uniform type, color, material, shape & style. Letters NMT 24 inches. Max. 2 lines of copy. NMT 5% of area of elevation of tenant space or bay. (1) Staff Analysis: Section 78 -285, Table 24, "Flat/Wall Sign for Ground Floor Users," is intended to address signage for retail users located on the ground floor with separate entrances into retail buildings and commercial shopping centers. Staff normally has no objection to more than one building identification sign, when adequately justified, provided the signs have the same name, and are for the same tenant. It is staff's professional opinion that multiple signs for different tenants create an undesirable and cluttered appearance. Furthermore, such signs constitute a form of advertising instead of providing a means of "way finding" to a particular destination. Date Prepared: June 18, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: MISC- 07 -01- 000022 • It is staff's goal to protect the integrity of the PGA Boulevard corridor, consistent with the requirements and intent of Section 78 -221 of the City's LDR. Specifically, the intent of these guidelines is to create a unique, high quality and special identity for this boulevard. The guidelines also call for the preservation of the visual character of the corridor. However, permitting an increase in the number of signs on traditional office buildings along PGA Boulevard is incompatible with the character of the corridor. Therefore, for the reasons stated above, staff recommends denial of this waiver request. • is STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends DENIAL of Petition MISC- 07 -01- 000022. Jh /Case Files /PGA Financial Center /PGA Financial Center-files/Staff report PZAB.doc M • Attachment A 40 i Lost Tree Village Corporation May 16, 2007 Ms. Jackie Holloman, AICP, Planner City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 RE: Petition MISC -07 -01 -00022 PGA Financial Center Signage Dear Ms. Holloman: Pursuant to our telephone conversation I transmit this letter for your consideration in support of the above referenced application. • Please note that the proposed signage will not utilize race ways and shall be integrated into the building design such that prestigious corporate tenants may identify their presence to the public. In accordance with the provisions of the Code of Ordinances for the City of Palm Beach Gardens, the application of PGA Financial Center for a waiver in signage requirements is requested as it complies with a majority of the criteria for approval contained therein as follows: 78- 158(i) Criteria. A request for the city council to approve a waiver from one or more of the standards and requirements applicable to a planned development, PUD, or PCD; shall comply with a majority of the criteria listed below. (1) The request is consistent with the city's comprehensive plan. Response: Objective 13.1.1 of the City's comprehensive plan states that the city "shall maintain and expand a diversified economy by encouraging growth in targeted cluster industries that provide high wage employment ... " As a Class A office building, PGA Financial Plaza's strong national, regional and local tenants represent the medical, real estate, banking, investment and development industries. These industries are well known for their payment of significantly above average wages and benefits and attract employees and clients with high education levels and incomes, and location within the City should be encouraged. 3399 PGA Boulevard, Suite 260, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Office: (561) 626 -9711 Fax: (561) 626 -9641 • Policy 13.1.1.2 provides that "the City shall assist the retention and growth of existing businesses within the City, particularly those that provide high - wage employment or that support or complement those employment sectors." For reasons that will be discussed in responses below, the additional signage supports the businesses that are the tenants of PGA Financial Plaza, in keeping with the intent of this Policy. Objective 13.1.2 is to "Moderate Seasonality in Employment." The tenants of PGA Financial Plaza do not seasonally adjust their employment, but rather strive for long term employment of their professional employees and support staff. For these reasons the requested waiver is consistent with the comprehensive plan, encouraging development incorporating aesthetics and functionality to promote viable economic development. (2) The request is consistent with the purpose and intent of this section. Response: The stated the purpose and intent of Section 78 -158, is to encourage projects that are innovative, creative and utilize planning, design and architectural concepts that will be of benefit the City. The development of PGA Financial Plaza as part . of a PCD led to a building design that has two fronts and no back. The building was designed to be attractive from all directions because it has predominate road frontage on three sides (PGA Boulevard, Fairchild Gardens Avenue and Mall Perimeter Road). So while the building may be identified by motorists from PGA Boulevard, a substantial number of visitors identify their destination while traveling on Mall Perimeter Road and all visitors access the property from Mall Perimeter Road. A typical office building would have a front with substantial architectural detail, one or two sides with lesser detail and a back with no detail. PGA Financial Plaza four -sided design benefits the City by multiple attractive and expensive -to- construct facades. (3) The request is in support of and furthers the city's goals, objectives, and policies to establish development possessing architectural significance, pedestrian amenities and linkages, employment, opportunities, reductions in vehicle trips, and a sense of place. Response: A location on PGA Boulevard and at the Gardens Mall was not intended, nor is it suitable for substantial pedestrian access. PGA Boulevard was designed with multiple lanes of traffic in each direction, high traffic counts and vehicles traveling at relatively high speeds. There is a great deal of development and activity in the area, which bombards the motorist with many moving and static images. 3399 PGA Boulevard, Sure 260, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Office: (561) 626 -9711 Fax. (561) 626 -9641 As a result the motorist must be able to quickly identify his destination from a distance in order to safely cross travel lanes and turn at the proper locations. Traveling on PGA Boulevard is not the time to be forced to look for inconspicuous or nonexistent identifying signage. Proper signage is actually a safety issue. The requested waiver will provide for wall signage for two additional major anchor tenants in the building. The signage will furnish a visual marker for the public to locate these business locations, resulting in better circulation by eliminating traveler confusion. (4) The request demonstrates that granting of the waiver will result in a development that exceeds one or more of the minimum requirements for PUDs. Response: The existing property originally was permitted for more parking spaces than required, has greater setbacks than required, and its open areas are greater than that required. In addition, the property was heavily landscaped when it was developed and has been well- maintained since it was landscaped resulting in attractive, mature growth, exceeding landscape requirements. (5) The request for one or more waivers results from innovative design in which other minimum standards are exceeded. . Response: The design with road frontage on three sides resulted in a building with multiple attractive sides, but one that did not provide for adequate identifying signage for each of the frontage roads. It should be noted that the request is not to place all of the signage on a single fagade of the building, which would be cluttered and unattractive. Instead, the request is to place some additional signage on each of two facades so that there is identifying signage at the main access points. There will be no viewpoint that would enable seeing the increased signage on the two facades at the same time. (6) The request demonstrates that granting of the waiver will result in preservation of valuable natural resources, including environmentally- sensitive lands, drainage and recharge areas, and coastal areas. Response: (not applicable) (7) The request clearly demonstrates public benefits to be derived, including but not limited to such benefits as no -cost dedication of rights of way, extensions of pedestrian linkages outside of the project boundaries, preservation of important natural resources, and use of desirable architectural, building and site design techniques. Response: The placement of the requested signage will offer public benefits through the identification of principle tenants for pedestrian and vehicular travelers outside of the property boundaries. This will encourage more efficient circulation by eliminating destination uncertainty. 3399 PGA Boulevard, Suite 260, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 3 Office: (561) 626 -9711 Fax: (561) 626 -9641 The signage is proposed to face the major travel ways (PGA Boulevard and Mall Perimeter Road). The location below the third floor is requested, as this is the only level devoid of Sornamentional banding on the building exterior. In addition, these locations place the signage where it is in the line of sight for travelers, but does not have a significant effect or presents when the building is viewed from a distance. (8) Sufficient screening and buffering, if required, are provided to screen adjacent uses from adverse impacts caused by a waiver. Response: As illustrated on the proposed elevations the existing site landscaping will buffer and screen the visual impact of the proposed signage. This will soften and filter the view from adjacent uses. It should be noted that the proposed signage is consistent with the signage already in place on adjacent properties. (9) The request is not based solely or predominantly on economic reasons. Response: While there is an economic element for the requested waiver, it is not the sole or predominate reason. Major tenant occupants are not adequately identified to the public. For example there are currently two additional tenants in the building who occupy as much or more building area as does the one tenant whose name is presently on the building. The waiver to allow building signage for such tenants will promote greater public convenience in finding their destination and minimizing circulation conflicts from destination. The sign code was designed for the typical office building that has frontage on one road, so that it is only necessary to identify the destination from one direction. The sign code did not consider a situation where there is significant frontage on three roads. There is simply insufficient signage when access is from multiple directions. (10) The request will be compatible with existing and potential land uses adjacent to the development site. Response: The land uses adjacent to the property are of like use and in fact contain building signage consistent with this requested waiver. Please refer to submitted exhibits of signage on adjacent buildings. The area is fully developed, so potential adjoining land uses are not a consideration. (11) The request demonstrates the development will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this section, and that such waiver or waivers will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. (Ord. No. 17 -2000, & 92, 7- 20 -00; Ord. No 17 -2004, & 5, 6 -3 -04) Response: The requested waiver is consistent with the general purpose and intent of Section 78 -158 as enumerated herein. The requested waivers, if granted will not be injurious to the area or detrimental to public health, safety and welfare, but rather will promote public convenience, and facilitate greater safety through the identification of major destinations. 3399 PGA Boulevard, Suite 260, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 4 Office: (561) 626 -9711 Fax. (561) 626 -9641 • The proposed signage is consistent with existing signage on adjacent properties. Please feel free to contact me if you require additional information or have any questions regarding this application. I shall provide you with a copy of the Power Point presentation prior to the June 12th Planning and Zoning meeting. Yours truly, R'0- -e Russell J. Burke, AICP cc: Bertie Russo, LTV LLC Doug Marek, Esq. Guy C. Pelletier, R.A., Strassler Architects, Inc. 3399 PGA Boulevard, Suite 260, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Office: (561) 626 -9711 Fax: (561) 626 -9641 PARKING D E MA 1"N' D� April 2007 Drug Store /Pharmacy with Drive Thru Prepared by rl !M r1j Kimley -Horn Kimley -Horn ►. ___ and Associates, Inc. • SECTION TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION.............................................................. ..............................1 SITESELECTION ...................................................................... ............................... 2 PARKING DATA COLLECTION ............................................. ............................... 4 PARKING DATA SUMMARY .................................................. ............................... 7 CONCLUSION.......................................................................... ............................... 10 • APPENDICES .................................................. ............................... Following Page 10 • Page i PPP7 Kimley -Horn hhh.,' and Associates, Inc. • is C LIST OF FIGURES Fi_gure No. Title Page L Candidate Site Locations .................................. ............................... 3 2 Peak Parking Demand Rates ............................. ............................... 9 LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title Pa_qe I Parking Demand Study Candidate Sties ........... ............................... 2 2 Parking Occupancy — Friday, October 20, 2006 ............................. 5 3 Parking Occupancy — Wednesday, October 25, 2006 ..................... 6 4 Summary of Observed Peak Parking Demand . ............................... 8 Page ii Kimfey -Horn and Associates, Inc. • INTRODUCTION Kimley -Elorn and Associates, Inc. has undertaken a parking demand study at various retail drug stores in northern Palm Beach County. The intent of the study is to establish a parking demand rate which can be applied to retail drug stores or pharmacies with drive thru facilities. The City of Palm Beach Gardens Land Development Code requires 5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of drug store /pharmacy. This parking study was conducted to assess the actual parking demand for a drug store /pharmacy use, by conducting parking counts at nine drug stores /pharmacies in northern Palm Beach County and will be used • as technical justification for an amendment to update the parking requirement for a "Drugstore or Pharmacy, General, with Drive Thru ". LJ Page 1 PPP'- Kimley -Horn • hh..- and Associates, Inc. SITE SELECTION The nine candidate sites for this parking demand study, three of which are located in the City of Palm Beach Gardens, were selected based on their size and whether they had a drive -thru window. The following nine sites were identified as potential candidates: ■ Military Trail & Frederick Small Road - CVS Pharmacy • Military Trail & Donald Ross Road - CVS Pharmacy • Military Trail & Indiantown Road - CVS Pharmacy • Military Trail & Indiantown Road - Walgreens • North Lake Boulevard & Congress Avenue - CVS Pharmacy • North Lake Boulevard & Congress Avenue — Walgreens • • North Lake Boulevard & US I - CVS Pharmacy ■ North Lake Boulevard & US I - Walgreens • Indiantown Road & Maplewood Drive - Walgreens • Data from the nine candidate sites are presented in the Table 1 and their locations are illustrated in Figure 1. Table 1 Parking Demand Study Candidate Sites Store Location SSF Drive -Thru Candidate C2 Military Trail & Indiantown Road 12,500 Yes Yes C3 Military Trail & Frederick Small Road 12,500 Yes Yes C4 Military Trail & Donald Ross Road 9,200 Yes Yes C5 North Lake Boulevard & Congress Avenue 14,000 Yes Yes C6 North Lake Boulevard & US 1 11,000 Yes Yes W2 Indiantown Road & Maplewood Drive 20,700 Yes Yes W3 Military Trail & Indiantown Road 18,000 Yes Yes W4 North Lake Boulevard & Congress Avenue 18,500 Yes Yes W5 North Lake Boulevard & US 1 12,000 Yes Yes Page 2 • • N we s I i 0 4,000 8,000 Feet PARKING DEMAND STUDY Figure 1 Candidate Site Locations 0 Candidate Site Locations flKim" -Hom amd Associates, Inc. 144063000 —11,n„ / Kimsey -Horn • hb.— ___ _ and Associates, Inc. PARKING DATA COLLECTION Parking counts were collected for each of the nine candidate sites on Friday, October 20, 2006 and Wednesday, October 25, 2006. The parking counts were recorded in half - hour increments from 1 l a.m. to 8:30 p.m. by aerial photos taken from a helicopter. The actual number of occupied parking spaces and the vehicles in the drive -thru were compiled by visual inspection of the photos. The parking counts from the nine candidate sites for each half hour for the two days are summarized in Tables 2 and 3. The aerials photos of the peak half -hour occupancy of each of the nine sites are provided in Appendix A. • The CVS drug store (C5) at the intersection of North Lake Boulevard and Congress Avenue is located in close proximity to a fitness center, LA Fitness. The parking • occupancy in the southwestern side of the parking lot is far from the drug store entrance and was consistently occupied by the patrons of the fitness center. These vehicles were removed from the parking demand counts to be representative of actual drug store demand. A car wash facility is located adjacent to the Walgreens pharmacy (W2) at the intersection of Indiantown Road & Maplewood Drive. The rear aisle of the parking lot at this site was consistently occupied by the employees of the car wash facility. These vehicles were removed from the parking demand counts to be representative of actual drug store demand. Page 4 0 � k $� � � � k @ ! \ k ! ! ! / f | ) } ! k }{ � ikf ! |$§ \ }\ !!z !!� �f «\` t ®2){]! !! ;!! =_■ „ a «eae = = =,�2�� �! !� 3i DL!■agm ;;R =mm,= =qqt ;= Z. ! ;»2l�,,,,,�, \gym „ @@mom* ;m■,mgmmgR 77 \\\ (#)k/ � ]) ■¥; ;� ;!!l ;g�� ;gmmq% :,,,,��=,32■ =�32 ;��� ; ®j)f �)}- ;! \) 2,�,��� ;,�,� �. 42 > °! |)52m == m■m; == 2m«lC2I ;w &!! ] §!!20���.� �k }k �!• ® e=== = =,� = =s, =��2 ;) |�{ °\ \j !!!!!q!R8R828Rig k @ ! \ k ! ! ! / f | ) } ! k }{ � ikf ! |$§ \ }\ !!z � !| � � 2] �_ ■! ++,,,,�������� ®) ®« - ���� ;]f§ f 2 mq■ ° ° :�� �kkj! f AmGm»,A ;@mRm;m, }�))ƒ | =2 ,R ,R o °\ ±k §)= ==al = ;m,e =Gm ;;;m ■m o NNNmq;nl ;q ; ;G!@s,m EEC) ! „�� 1 2 2 „����.� 2 2 2 -��, §�! a) { ` =e =lelg■=&�,�© R! S; ! l.aaaaaaaeg8;eaaa #aaa | T 2 ) �! o }} ;| )! }| {{ = ❑ Kimfey -Horn M and Associates, Inc. PARKING DATA SUMMARY The peak parking demand observed at each of the nine sites on each of the two dates was converted to a parking demand rate based on the size of the store at the candidate sites. This rate was factored up to account for peak season fluctuations using the peak season conversion factor recommended by the Florida Department of Transportation. Peak season conversion factors of 1.21 and 1.19 were used for the parking counts observed on October 20, 2006 and October 25, 2006, respectively. The parking supply and the peak parking demand rates are summarized in Table 4. The peak season adjusted peak parking demand rates for the candidate sites is illustrated in Figure 3. The peak parking demand rate of all the nine candidate sites observed is 2.69 parking • spaces per 1,000 square feet of drug store /pharmacy and 2.87 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of drug store/pharmacy for October 20, 2006 and October 25, 2006, Ir1 i.J respectively. The 85th percentile of the parking demand rate for all the nine candidate sites observed is 2.29 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of drug store /pharmacy and 2.44 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of drug store /pharmacy for October 20, 2006 and October 25, 2006, respectively. A demand -based analysis was also performed in which parking requirements for the drug store /pharmacy land use was determined based upon the typical demand ratios from the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Parking Generation, Third Edition report. According to this report, the average peak period parking demand for a drug store /pharmacy with a drive -thru window is 2.02 spaces per 1,000 square feet of drug store /pharmacy on a weekday. (see Appendix B) Page 7 • T W 08 CD Q E -O Y ca C 11 1/ • fl _( cn F c Y L a C 0 0 (0 N Y �a a� m L 0 U O m 3 N O `o U �9 C O N N C O c N 0_ �- N C E U' o r U O O O O co Cl) N 00 co 00 ' h; 01 .— CO 00 00 .— O O O I Q O N N N N CV N O LO CM N ; C r L m CL O ; Y N U co N c}' co LO LO 6') 00 0) O Cp M 00 Cl) 00 N co 01 ; 01 cG ; N o N O N a ' N ; 1 Y N C ; d 'a O CD � E CL C— LO N N N - O co M M K; U K m IC N ; 0 a. O Cn (n C ;LO ' co i p 1 n co N � co N c0' V V c0 ' Y dN p N N N LO M co N ; m N ' (D a. O ' ' 1 ; to O 1 ' ' CD U N N 00 co LO O co O r— ; C O N N LO M M N ' 1 ' N a ' O 1 m ; a co 00 N M O M 00 co � � Q N 1 o ; N ' ; 0) LL: 1 rn M ( 1 ; C p co O N O CO It O Ln LO LO co co M � O 1 ; cn 'AL � 1 a ' ; 1 O LO O 07 1 R 00 O) O O ti � V m a 1 ' a ; 1 ; O O O O O O O O O y O O O O O O O (D O ' L a+ L LQ N O O_ � C I.C) O 1 7 C\j O U- .N- N A�C/T� vJ ; 1 1 I — O c 3 9 It V) ? m D �' N 3 M 3 > 3 m N m 3 ; 1 1 N V M V V p V �r iA () fD (� N N C p VJ c f/1 Y fn L 1 c�a m v a v L M 41 d N d 2 i L — L L o L 1 U U o U o 0 () Z 00 () Z 0) _ CA CA Z M 0) M ; ; p �N- M l0 CD fC M O O N 1- M c 1 - C 0 0 (0 N Y �a a� m L 0 U O m 3 N O `o U �9 C O N N C O c N 0_ �- N [7 • ci o E u a C m c,j E IM 0 LL Y L m a Y m 0 IL U� M LO N U co N r OWN 6UDIJed U� O O N ca N C N N DI m M ti N O1 ^ (0 O N N N N V N O Of � m C >y N l9 cn 0l U rte+ T U a = o C) U N 0 LO N U U cn o U C (0 0 U > U c� U_ U U_ n J J wCN cn N N M M OI O0 o 00 r m Nr w N N rn r in a M tco Nr as v o i. N r N N , U� M LO N U co N r OWN 6UDIJed U� O O N ca N C N N DI m M ti N O1 ^ (0 O N N N N V N O Of � m C >y N l9 cn 0l U rte+ T U a = o C) U N 0 LO N U U cn o U C (0 0 U > U c� U_ U U_ n J J P" - „ Kimley -Horn M — and Associates, Inc. CONCLUSION Nine drug stores /pharmacies with drive -thru windows were studied on a typical Wednesday and Friday from 11 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. at half -hour intervals to observe the parking demand characteristics. The maximum parking demand observed during the peak period for all the nine sites was 2.87 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of drug store /pharmacy. The 85th percentile of parking demand observed during the peak period of all the nine sites were 2.44 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of drug store /pharmacy. The results from the parking study support a parking occupancy of less than 3.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet of drug store /pharmacy. Therefore, the rate of 4.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet of drug store /pharmacy will provide more than adequate parking supply for a drug store /pharmacy with drive thru land use in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. Page 10 Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. APPENDICES Page I l a � ❑ Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. • Parking Data Collection APPENDIX A, N V V • Co In C`7 C`7 J LL i N .Q ry s= O s= C6 s= ti LO M � t 1 } 1 OVA, 1 I LI R T� AMP 1 , a G -� mom i � 6 v - ~ t i 00 LO It M M J L.L • i a 0 M LO t0 0 0 N L N w W m O F- U O E i N • V � � (6 V � (a O O Ir- d' • i a 0 M LO t0 0 0 N L N w W m O F- U O E • 00 T- It C`7 C`7 J LL u c Cll L C6 L U .-. Co Cll V m V Cn U) O ry m c O M O O LO It CL 0 • 11 00 c1r) LL CU 70 L- (10 1 0 0 Co CO E -01 U) U) of of I 0 0 n C) 0 • .�. • V V M O It C'7 C'7 J LL N L- m IM, U (Cf N m E cu n m CU m J L O Z 00 r C`7 • • C) M M J LL (n N i R3 u L .-� M LO N V m U) — U a0 a� c� J L- 0 Z r M a O M N t0 O O N Sri N w m O H U O i� • u co C) CY) LL -C� CO cu O cn E co 0 >z a) -�d cu —i 0 Z CY) I-] L • • 00 C) It CY) CY) —j LL E ...... CU CO 0- L) > z 0 L) 70 > co (1) -se J 0- Z a CY) PIWI V .� a. O O O W C13 0 0 • u 00 LO ,It k" cy') CY) —i LL N CL W -0 . N LLJ U _j 0 C) C) 00 T- 1) IN a: CD i - NN Lu 0 i �4F O • Ul ftJA to 00 LO 9 Joe cle) CY) —j ig" A LL 3: CL Z W zt Lu _0 C: CD CD 00 LO CD 04 LU 0 Mp tLLJLA 10 JP • 00 LO It M M J Li- M p W � C7 � J p Q � (Y) d- r: co LO ml- CY) CY) -j U- co Z W 70 UJ cr w c 0 � J 0 < 4-0 c cu 7C) C: CY) 0, 7 t v IL A. LU CD 0 • 11 • CY) CD M CY) -i LL Cli _0 co Iq -D U) (2) co Z cn LLJ uu E w cu Q-0 > cn J 0 Z co (D C) co — Fi Ali CD ,n T- 04 w LLI m 0 A T+ • r C'e) O M CY) co 00—% C., C) Cl) ( co Z rn W LU E w co 2: ch w. cu ol Z, Cfl C) co �4 LO w CD 0 CN Lci C14 w LU co 0 0 r. 16� j I A. 11 . tit- F -� 2 'a1 O M N r CO O O N O N w W m O U Me 00 It M CY) J LL LO C/) Z W E W CZ � J 0 Q z O N 16� j I A. 11 . tit- F -� 2 'a1 O M N r CO O O N O N w W m O U Me • 0 00 C) qqt (Y) CY) LL LO to (1) cn Z E uu — UJ CU Qt 0 z ov lag his 4k ■ i If ti O O CN C4 L6 N w LLI m 0 0 i r �„ Kimley -Horn • h — _ and Associates, Inc. APPENDIX B Parking Generation Manual – Pharmacy Use • 0 Land Use: 881 Pharmacy /Drugstore with Drive- Through Window Land Use Description Pharmacies /drugstores are retail facilities that primarily sell prescription and non- prescription drugs. These facilities may also sell cosmetics, toiletries, medications, stationery, personal care products, limited food products and general merchandise. The drug stores in this category contain drive- through windows. Pharmacy /drugstore without a drive - through window (Land Use 880) is a related use. Database Description Average parking supply ratios: 4.9 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA (11 study sites) and 3.0 spaces per employee (three study sites). Average employee density: 1.6 employees per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA (three study sites). Study SitesNears Henrietta, NY (1999); Honeoye Falls, NY (1999); Norristown, PA (1999); Philadelphia, PA (1999); Pottstown, PA (1999); Rochester, NY (1999); Springfield, PA (1999); Webster, NY (1999); Whitpain, PA (1999) In9f7Wte of TransporhOw Enghwm 237 Pgriang Gene�ar� 3rd E N 0 • is Land Use: 881 Pharmacy /Drugstore with Drive - Through Window Average Peak Period Parking Demand vs: 1,000 sq. ft. GFA On a: Weekday Weekday Peak Period Parking Demand 0 50 - -- 40 -- - - - - -- _� -- - -- > 30 - _ - -- - - - -- - -- + • 20 + ti 10 - - - - — - - Ts- 11 a 0 - - -�-- - -- 0 5 10 15 x =1,000 sq. ft. GFA Institute of Transportation Engineers • Actual Data Pants 238 Pinking Genera�an, 3rd f�dfon Peak Period 4:00 -6:00 .m. Number of Stud Sites 15 Avera a Size of Stud Sites 10,900 ft. GFA Avera a Peak Period Parking Demand 2.02 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA Standard Deviation 0.72 Coefficient of Variation ' 36% Range 0.79 -3.67 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA 85th Percentile 2.48 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA 33rd Percentile 1.74 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA Weekday Peak Period Parking Demand 0 50 - -- 40 -- - - - - -- _� -- - -- > 30 - _ - -- - - - -- - -- + • 20 + ti 10 - - - - — - - Ts- 11 a 0 - - -�-- - -- 0 5 10 15 x =1,000 sq. ft. GFA Institute of Transportation Engineers • Actual Data Pants 238 Pinking Genera�an, 3rd f�dfon t Land Use: 881 Pharmacy /Drugstore with Drive - Through Window Average Peak Period Parking Demand vs: 1,000 sq. ft. GFA On a: Saturday Saturday Peak Period Parking Demand 50 40 - -- - — -- ' - - as > 20 a 10__ - -- u IL 0 0 5 10 15 x = 1,000 sq. ft. GFA Institute of Transportation Engineers • Actual Data Points 239 ft" G&wvbN 3rd Edrdon 11:00 a.m. 2:00 .m. ud Sites 7...n...t, 14 Average of Stud Sites 10,900 sq. ft. GFA Period Parkin Demand 2.10 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA Standard Deviation 0.65 Coefficient of Variation 31% Range 0.97 -3.58 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA 85th Percentile 2.59 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA 33rd Percentile 1.87 vehicles per 1,000 sq. ft. GFA Saturday Peak Period Parking Demand 50 40 - -- - — -- ' - - as > 20 a 10__ - -- u IL 0 0 5 10 15 x = 1,000 sq. ft. GFA Institute of Transportation Engineers • Actual Data Points 239 ft" G&wvbN 3rd Edrdon Date Prepared: March 6, 2003 ORDINANCE 7, 2003 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR A REZONING OF AN APPROXIMATELY 21.72 -ACRE PARCEL OF LAND FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA (PDA) TO A RESIDENTIAL MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) OVERLAY, TO BE KNOWN AS "LEGENDS AT THE GARDENS," BY APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION OF 19,375 SQUARE FEET OF BUSINESS OFFICE USE, 19,375 SQUARE FEET OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (CN) USE, 186 MULTI- FAMILY DWELLING UNITS, AND ASSOCIATED AMENITIES, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DONALD ROSS ROAD AND CENTRAL BOULEVARD, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR WAIVERS; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Palm Beach Gardens received an application (PUD- 02 -01) from Cotleur Hearing, agent, for approval of a rezoning of approximately 21.72 acres of land from Planned Development Area (PDA) to a Residential Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay to allow for the construction of 19,375 square feet of Professional/Business Office Use, 19,375 square feet of Neighborhood Commercial (CN) Use, 186 multi - family units, a pool house, a swimming pool, and a tot lot, located on the southwest corner of Donald Ross Road and Central Boulevard, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application and determined that it is sufficient; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application and determined that it is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has recommended approval of the Residential Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (PUD) known as "Legends at the Gardens "; and WHEREAS, on November 26, 2002, the City's Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing and recommended approval of the rezoning and the master plan of development; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined the adoption of this Ordinance to be in the best Date Prepared: March 6, 2003 . Ordinance 7, 2003 Page 2 of 10 interest of the citizens and residents of the City of Palm Beach Gardens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, THAT: SECTION 1. The foregoing "WHEREAS" clauses are hereby ratified and confirmed as being true and correct and are hereby made a specific part of this Ordinance upon adoption hereof. SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, hereby approves the rezoning of approximately 21.72 acres of land from Planned Development Area (PDA) to a Residential Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay to allow for the construction of 19,375 square feet of Professional/Business Office Use, 19,375 square feet of Neighborhood Commercial (CN) Use, 186 multi - family units, a pool house, a swimming pool, and a tot lot, located on the southwest corner of Donald Ross Road and Central Boulevard, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. SECTION 3. Said Planned Unit Development is approved subject to the following conditions, which shall be the responsibility of the applicant, its successors or assigns: Landscaping and Maintenance 1. The applicant shall be required to submit the median and roadway shoulder beautification plans for Central Boulevard to the City for approval prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the Legends at the Gardens Planned Unit Development. (City Forester) 2. Lighting, landscaping and irrigation within medians, adjacent roadway shoulders, and pedestrian pathways for Central Boulevard and Donald Ross Road shall be installed within six months of the issuance of the first clearing permit. (City Forester) 3. The applicant shall be required to provide pedestrian scale (maximum twelve foot (12') height) lighting along the pedestrian pathways along Donald Ross Road and Central Boulevard. The lighting plan for the meandering pedestrian sidewalk within the parkway /preserve area shall be submitted within 30 days of approval. (Planning & Zoning) 4. The petitioner, successors and assigns shall be responsible for the lighting, landscape, irrigation, and maintenance of Donald Ross Road and Central Boulevard per Ordinance 36, 2002 (aka Roadway Beautification Plan). (City Forester) 5. All the PUD buffers shall be installed within six months of the issuance of the first land - clearing permit. The Growth Management Department shall inspect the supplemental planting for the preserve areas and buffers where voids in groundcover and shrubs occur in order to screen the first 6' - 8' of all structures within the project. The City Forester and Landscape Architect of Record shall work together on a plan, if necessary, to fill any voids with additional landscaping as required by the City Forester to achieve said screening. (City Forester) 6. The recreation area and entry road landscaping shall be completed prior to issuance of the Date Prepared: March 6, 2003 Ordinance 7, 2003 Page 3 of 10 ninety -third (93) residential Certificate of Occupancy. (City Forester) 7. Prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall remove all exotic vegetation from the preserve areas. No non - native plant may be established in a preserve area. (City Forester) 8. The entry road landscaping shall be completed prior to issuance of the first residential Certificate of Occupancy. (City Forester) 9. Exhibit `B" shall be used as a guideline for the location of approximately 3.47 acres of upland preserve set aside. Prior to the issuance of any clearing permit for Parcels 4.01/4.10 (AKA Legends at the Gardens), a conservation easement shall be publicly recorded over the Sandtree PUD Plated Lots 31 through 52. Said "Sandtree PUD" conservation easement shall be dedicated to a private or public entity for maintenance responsibilities. (City Forester) 10. Prior to the issuance of any clearing permit for Parcels 4.01/4.10, the petitioner shall obtain staff's approval of the Upland Preserve Management Plan for the "Sandtree PUD" conservation easement, which shall include an upland Oak Hammock plant community restoration plan 'as approved by the City Forester. (City Forester) 11. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the area contained within the "Sandtree PUD" conservation easement shall be restored to an upland Oak Hammock plant community. (City Forester) 12. Within three (3) months of the City Council's decision on the specific location and design of the City entryway sign applicable to the Legends at the Gardens PUD, the applicant shall file an administrative amendment petition with the Growth Management Department to include said entryway sign. The specific location may be the southwest corner of Donald Ross Road and Central Boulevard. The applicant shall construct and maintain said entryway sign(s) within twelve (12) months of the City Council's approval of the entryway sign program. (Planning & Zoning) Transportation / Traffic Concurrenc_y 13. The project build -out date is December 31, 2004. (City Engineer) 14. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, an exclusive right -turn ingress lane with 320 feet of stacking storage at the Donald Ross Road driveway shall be completed, approved by the City Engineer and accepted by the County. (City Engineer) 15. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, an exclusive right -turn ingress lane with 445 feet of stacking storage at the Central Boulevard driveway shall be completed, approved by the City Engineer and accepted by the County. (City Engineer) 16. No more than 4,445 net new external trips (any combination of land uses) may be permitted until contract has been let for the expansion of Hood Road from Military Trail to Alternate A 1 A to a four -lane- divided cross - section. The applicant shall submit a traffic summary showing the amount of traffic generated for each building with each building permit submittal in order to monitor this condition. (City Engineer) 17. Prior to issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant, successors, or assigns Date Prepared: March 6, 2003 Ordinance 7, 2003 ' Page 4 of 10 shall monitor traffic operation studies of the Donald Ross Road and Central Boulevard intersection beginning- during peak season after the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy and every six months thereafter until the build -out date. Should such study indicate a need for any roadway /intersection improvements as determined by the City Engineer, the applicant, successor, or assigns shall be required to provide a pro -rata share of installation costs as determined by the City Engineer. (City Engineer) 18. For all improvements that are not assured construction, the developer shall enter into a Public Facility Agreement (PFA) with Pahn Beach County for funding of the roadway improvements in a form acceptable to the County Engineer, within six (6) months of the issuance of the development order, and before the first building permit is issued. (Palm Beach County, City Engineer) 19. Within 60 days of the effective date of this development order, the applicant shall submit a traffic equivalency statement reflecting the intensity /density of the approved master plan for approval by the City Engineer. Once the equivalency is approved, the applicant shall petition Palm Beach County and the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) to have the excess trips removed from the affected roadways. This must be completed prior to issuance of the first building permit. (Planning & Zoning, City Engineer) 20. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, FPL's driveway modification site plans and construction plans shall be approved by the City and surety for the improvements shall be posted with the City. (City Engineer) Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) 21. The applicant shall provide metal halide lighting within the commercial /office portion of the development. (Police) 22. The applicant shall provide metal halide lighting within the entire amenity (recreation) area and along the entryway leading into the recreation area. The applicant may provide high- pressure sodium lighting within the remainder of the residential community. (Police) 23. The applicant shall construct the development in accordance with Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles, which consist of the following: (Police) (a) Landscaping shall not conflict with lighting (including long -term tree growth); (b) A timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting shall be installed above or near entryways to residences and all sidewalks; (c) Street and pedestrian walkways shall use lighting that is no greater than 14 feet in height; and (d) Numerical addresses shall be illuminated for nighttime visibility, shall have bi- directional visibility from the roadway, and shall be a minimum of six inches in height. Miscellaneous 24. Prior to the issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall: Date Prepared: March 6, 2003 Ordinance 7, 2003 Page 5 of 10 (a) Provide a street address system depicting street names and residential numericals for emergency response purposes. Address system depiction shall be in 8.5" X 11" map format. (Police); and (b) Install and have operational, temporary roadways and fire hydrants approved by the City Engineer and Fire Department for all of the dry models. (Engineering and Fire). 25. Prior to the issuance of the first residential Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall submit the Property Owners Association and Homeowners Association documents for review and approval by the City Attorney. (City Attorney) 26. Six (6) months after issuance of the first residential building permit and semiannually thereafter until issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant, successors, or assigns shall submit a report showing the number of approved permits and certificates of occupancy issued to date. (City Engineer) 27. Prior to December 31 of every year following said project's approval, the applicant, successors or assigns shall submit to the Planning and Zoning Division, an annual report of the status of the project, including but not limited to the compliance or status of any conditions of approval placed on the project by this approval and any future approval until the project is completed. (Planning & Zoning) 28. The applicant shall provide all necessary construction zone signage and fencing as required by the City Engineer in the construction plans. (City Engineer) 29. Any modifications to the conceptual approval of the commercial portion of the development shall require a major amendment to the Planned Unit Development. (Planning & Zoning) 30. All permitted uses allowed within the Commercial Neighborhood (CN) zoning district as provided in the City's Land Development Regulations shall be permitted by right within the Planned Unit Development (PUD). All proposed conditional uses shall require conditional use approval by the City Council. (Planning & Zoning) 31. No medical office use shall be allowed within the allocated professional / business office use square footage of the Planned Unit Development (PUD). (Planning & Zoning) 32. Prior to the issuance of each occupational license or building permit for interior renovations of tenant spaces, the applicant or its agent shall submit a breakdown by use of the gross square footage for lease for approval by the Planning & Zoning Division. A minor change of up to 5% to the approved allocation of uses for the retail /office building (i.e. 19,375 square feet of Professional/Business Office Use and 19,375 square feet of Neighborhood Commercial (CN) Use) requires administrative review and approval of a parking and traffic equivalency analysis by the Planning and Zoning Division. Any major modifications (greater than 5 %) to the allocated uses shall require review and approval by City Council. (Planning & Zoning) 33. The applicant shall construct the required Unit 2 perimeter berm in the first phase of development. (City Engineer) SECTION 4. The following waivers are hereby granted with this approval: 1. Section 78 -285 Signs for Residential Development, to allow two sign faces on the entrance Date Prepared: March 6, 2003 • Ordinance 7, 2003 Page 6 of 10 signage. The Land Development Regulations allow a maximum of one (1) sign face per development. 2. Section 78- 154(g)(7) - Minimum Development Area, to allow a maximum development area of 21.72 acres. The Land Development Regulations require a minimum of 50 acres. 3. Section 78 -344 (1), Parking Stall and Bay Dimensions, to allow for 9'X 18.5' standard parking stalls. The Land Development Regulations require 10' X 18.5' parking stall dimensions. 4. Section 78 -252 Upland Preserve Mitigation, to allow for the off -site mitigation of a portion of the required 25% upland preserve set aside. The Land Development Regulations require a minimum 25% viable upland preservation on -site. 5. Section 78 -157 (f). Residential MXD Intensity Measures and Special Definitions, to allow for the non - vertical integration of the minimum 20% residential high land allocation within a residential mixed -use development. The Land Development Regulations require the minimum residential high land -use to be integrated vertically with non - residential uses. SECTION 5. Construction of the Planned Unit Development shall be in compliance with the following plans on file with the City's Growth Management Department: 1. January 17, 2003 Cover Sheet by Cotleur & Hearing, Sheet 1 of 14. 2. December 5, 2002 MXD Land -Use Allocation by Cotleur & Hearing, Sheet 2 of 14. 3. February 28, 2003 Master Site Plan by Cotleur & Hearing, Sheet 3 of 17. 4. February 28, 2003 Site Plan by Cotleur & Hearing, Sheet 4 of 17. 5. February 28, 2003 Site Plan by Cotleur & Hearing, Sheet 5 of 17. 6. February 28, 2003 Enlarged Site Plan by Cotleur & Hearing, Sheet 6 of 17. 7. June 10, 2002 Typical Unit Site Plan by Cotleur Hearing, Sheet 7 of 14. 8. February 28, 2003 Site Details by Cotleur & Hearing, Sheet 8 of 14. 9. June 10, 2002 Entry Hardscape Details by Cotleur & Hearing, Sheet 9 of 14. 10. February 28, 2003 Landscape Plan by Cotleur & Hearing, Sheet 10 of 17. 11. February 28, 2003 Landscape Plan by Cotleur & Hearing, Sheet 11 of 14. 12. February 28, 2003 Landscape Plan by Cotleur & Hearing, Sheet 12 of 14. 13. February 28, 2003 Typical Unit Landscape Plan by Cotleur & Hearing, Sheet 13 of 14. 14. January 17, 2003 Landscape Details by Cotleur & Hearing, Sheet 14 of 14. 15. January 21, 2003 Floor Plans, Roof Plans, Elevations, & Details by Centex Homes, 14 sheets (BL.01 - BL.05, BLL.01 - BLL.04, CA.01- CA.03, D.01) 16. March 3, 2003 Preliminary Engineering (Conceptual w/ Details) by Schnars, 2 sheets. 17. December 20, 2002 Photometric Plan by Brannon & Gillespie, 2 sheets (El -P through E2 -P). 18. January 2003 Preserve Area Management Plan by Cotleur- Hearing. SECTION 6. All Ordinances or Parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. SECTION 7. If any clause, section, other part or application of this Ordinance is held by any court 4 Date Prepared: March 6, 2003 Ordinance 7, 2003 Page 7 of 10 of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid, in part or application, it shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions or applications of this Ordinance. SECTION 8 _ This Ordinance shall become effective upon the effective date of Ordinance 6, 2003. [This are intentionally left blank] Date Prepared: March 6, 2003 Ordinance 7, 2003 Page 8 of 10 PLACED ON FIRST READING THE 20`x' DAY OF JANUARY 2003. PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS (6"DAY OF 2003. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 61� DAY OF/-" 2003. I� ATTEST: PATRICIA s ER -;-C' Y--CLERK. VOTE: MAYOR JABLIN VICE MAYOR SABATELLO COUNCILMEMBER CLARK COUNCILMEMBER RUSSO COUNCILMEMBER DELGADO A IMEREBY CERTIFY that I have approved this ORDINANCE as to form. CITY ATTORNEY AYE NAY ABSENT c/ EXHIBIT A PARCEL 4.01 Date Prepared: March 6, 2003 Ordinance 7, 2003 Page 9 of IO A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 41 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS* BEGINNING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF DONALD ROSS ROAD AND THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CENTRAL BOULEVARD: THENCE SOUTH 00.48'04" WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, (THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CENTRAL BOULEVARD IS ASSUMED TO BEAR SOUTH 00.48'04" WEST AND ALL OTHER BEARINGS REFERENCED HEREIN ARE RELATIVE THERETO). A DISTANCE OF 49L30 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 00.48'04" WEST A DISTANCE OF 347.64 FEET TO SAID RIGHT OF WAY'S INTERSECTION WITH A NON - TANGENT CURVE HAVING A RADIAL BEARING OF NORTH 04.41'11" EAST. A RADIUS OF 840.06 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 55.12'02": THENCE PROCEED WESTERLY AND NORTH —&Y RANG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 809.34 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE SOUTH 89' 50106" EAST A DISTANCE OF 223.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 010 20137" EAST. A THENCE l9i.66 FEET; 50'06" EAST THENCE DISTANCE 01- OF 436.80 ~FF& DISTANCE THE POINT FEET; BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT CERTAIN RIGHT OF WAY DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9567. PAGE 761. PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. FLORIDA. PARCEt 4.10 A PARCEL OF LAID LYING IN SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 41 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY. FLORIDA. ,MD BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: � COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF DONALD ROSS ROAD MIN THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CENTRAL BOULEVARD: THENCE SOUTH 00.48'04" WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, (THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CENTRAL 69ULEVARD IS ASSUMED TO BEAR SOUTH 00' 48'04" WEST AND ALL OTHER BEARINGS REFERENCED HEREIN ARE RELATIVE THERETO) A DISTANCE OF 838.94 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIED PARCEL; THENCE SOUTH 00.48'04" WEST A DISTANCE OF 430.37 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89.51'04" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 923.93 FEAT TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 25: THENCE NORTH 01' 2017" EAST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 844.68 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89.50'06" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 252.09 FEET TO A CURVE HAVING A RADIAL BEARING OF NORTH 59' 53'13" EAST A RADIUS OF840.06 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 55.12'02 "; THENCE PRO&& ALONG THE ARC OF SAIb CURVE. A DISTANCE OF 809.34 ME T -TO THE END OF SAD CURVE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL. �L , i i I a EXHIBIT B Date Prepared: March 6, 2003 Ordinance 7, 2003 Page 10 of 10 S 1 • Lost Tree Village Corporation April 24, 2007 Jackie Holloman, AICP, Planner City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 Re: Petition MISC- 07 -01- 000022 PGA Financial Center Signage Dear Jackie, Please find enclosed updated information on my signage proposal per your request. First, the reason for the request is that I have been getting numerous requests from tenants and prospective tenants to add their name to the outside of the building. In order to stay • competitive in this market I need to be able to compete with the surrounding buildings in my area. Of these buildings, many have 2 -3 tenants on the face of their building. Please find the following pictures of these buildings attached: Picture 1 is of 11505 Fairchild showing Gehring Group and AG Edwards Picture 2, 3, and 4 are of 3501 PGA, Grand Bank building, showing Grand Bank Center, Grand Bank & Trust and Fidelity Investments Picture 5, 6 and 7 are of 3001 PGA, Sea Coast Building, showing Seacoast Banking Centre, CH2Mhi11 and Prudential Florida WCI Reality (signs do not match in color or font) Picture 8, 9, and 10 are of 3801 PGA, which show Virtual Bank and UBS as tenants Each of these buildings are located within one half ('/2) mile of the PGA Financial Plaza and all have more than one name on the building. As current tenants leases expire, we need to be able to offer this signage right to prospective tenants to be competitive with like buildings, shown above, that are able to offer this right. Also, the entry to the PGA Financial Plaza is on the mall access road. Our monument sign is located on the mall access road and is not visible from PGA. Our tenants need to 3399 PGA Boulevard, Suite 260, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Office: (561) 626 -9711 Fax: (561) 6261 -9641 • have visibility from PGA. This would not only help the Traffic Flow, but will help promote their business and keep our economy strong. As an example of what we are looking to do, please find attached Northeast and Southwest Elevations showing existing signage and proposed signage, a color photo estimating the proposed signage, and a site plan. We would like to put two (2) additional signs on the South side of the building, PGA side just above the 2nd floor windows and two (2) photos on the North side of the building, Mall side, also just above the 2nd floor. want to be able to offer this signage space to anyone coming into the building. Using the same colors, and sign specifications as existing. I believe you already have my legal description that was e- mailed this past February. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly at (561) 626 -9711. Respectfully, Bertie L. Russo, RPA • Lost Tree Village, LLC As Property Manager for Twenty -Fifth Palm Beach, LLC �I Cc: Russ Burke, AICP Lost Tree Village, LLC, Vero Beach 3399 PGA Boulevard, Suite 260, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Office: (561) 626 -9711 Fax: (561) 626 -9641 � r ��� !. �,. - `- � �� , 1. 1 � :e� ` }� ♦' �" 4 Q Im6 K :. x., f all r- � 0 11 7:7. 40 Awl Ao CJ8 fi WORM MR' (11 _. ���� \ \� \����\ . 0 � \� / \ � �� ]k � � \�,� I I t 1 0';60 ` ,.• oor a 4� �•r �,iy ¢ .inn. . p�� •7 r ' t 113 Ii 11 OMW i 6, fit 1�i 11 l� 11 i rte. on-MR �I • � - y�1 _.uu_ IP w1� 7 Rl 'v � 01. 1 oil 01 � oil oil P MMF7-.� �13 1 �1 rb 722 11 RM MY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64� �ox MMF7-.� �13 1 �1 rb 722 11 RM MY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64� 4 It 8 '.1.. O � 15 0 0 0 wx 0 9 ), y A i o �v Y ��� ��0 �' s�� ��� Petition MISC- 07 -01- 000022 PGA Financial Plaza Signage Exterior - Existing Signage Sign #: 1 Action Code Existing Sign Type Description Height Above Grade Illuminated Existing - South side L I F -W BO -36 -s 36" Cap. Ht. - Illum. Channel letters, Blue 720 Internally Illuminated Sign M 2 & 3 Add two signs below 3rd Action Code: Floor Existing Sign Type: LIF- WBO -36 -s 24" Cap. Ht. - Illum. Description: Channel letters, Blue Height Above Grade: 26' 9" Illuminated: Internally Illuminated Page 1 of 3 �r 3 1. New Signage to match existing signage in color and font. Size and name will be difference. • Petition MISC- 07 -01- 000022 PGA Financial Plaza Signage Exterior - Existing Signage Sign M 4 Action Code: Existing - North side Existing Sign Type: LIF- WBO -36 -s 36" Cap. Ht. - Illum. Description: Channel letters, Blue Height Above Grade: 720 Illuminated: Internally Illuminated Sign M 5 & 6 Add two signs below 3rd Action Code: Floor Existing Sign Type: LIF- WBO -36 -s 24" Cap. Ht. - Illum. Description: Channel letters, Blue Height Above Grade: 26' 9" Illuminated: Internally Illuminated Page 2 of 3 New Signage to match existing signage in color and font. Size and name will be difference. • Petition MISC- 07 -01- 000022 PGA Financial Plaza Signage Exterior - Proposed Signage Page 3 or 3 Sign # Type Description 1 1 LIF- WBO -36 -s (36" Cap. Ht.) Illum. Channel letters (Blue) Existing - Leave alone 4 LIF- WBO -36 -s (36" Cap. Ht.) Illum. Channel letters (Blue) Existing - Leave alone 2, 3 LIF- WBO -24 -s (24" Cap. Ht.) Illum. Channel letters (Blue) New Sign 5, 6 LIF- WBO -24 -s (24" Cap. Ht.) Illum. Channel letters (Blue) New Sign 2 & 3 axvs,•alsraoo slmC (9S)xva ml, anv ,orccv� tau '�ovaevrnatsaro•aruanvanrto ELMS Om r- 1 . vmaaw'srnaavoxovaa `viva jo el -7 Ia I I I I � lk 5 " ley 1 / t / s 4a • I I 1" I I " •3 i o-�C C Y C2 yq � \e � 1/ 140. lIf �ARpEt45 AVENUE . J N • Attachment B PGA Financial Center *I 61 is 11810 3634 3602 3630 3600 11701) 11802 3620 3620 > {11800 3610 3610 11700 L w DOWNTOWN AT GARDENS d 3503 J 11701 0: 11701 ALL 11701pa 1 t 545) 3502 1 / GRAANK C�IVTERI 35ot 1 r 3x01 3503501 340, 3401 k3801 1 \�._— It 'Ali P_GAP�' 111360 �1380� 11360 11370 —11385 11385 11340 11345 'A, 11340 11345 ''y fr 11330 11320 11296 LEGACY_AV. X11310 11285 T11300 1131011; V; 11290 3551 (2P 11290 v '` 11280 III 1280 11199 1131 11260 3503 Copyright (c)2007 City of Palm Beach�Gardens Is'1-„at9 � 0 $42ft f 101911014 PGA Financial Center 3109. 3105 310131101- 10,3101 310' 310' 3101 \! _ 3101 ,fr 310131013101 3101 3101 3101 31013101` 31013101 .3101 3101 3101 3101 310131013101 3101310 10131 3111 3101 V3101 3101 310' 3101._ 31013101 310i31�101 `3101 - �. L31SO 7 GA RD M L L RTHUR OFFI 43399 3399 /3250 332550' 3185 TENS PL 3195 3330 1 FAIRCHIL 3W1�3601 3co1 u PGA BLVD_ a 3188 IY 11303 O a' M Page 1 of 1 O w 2�?B9 3160 1 a D D f� D DISCLAIIL�AIIII All inform without ei used as < intended Printed: C • Attachment C 0 0 • • I Z _0 Q Q Z W J � W (� L.LJ Q C/) w0 = a- �-- 0 0 a. Z J V • rI z OW P: Q Q Z W � (n W W to �O = o- �O O a- J U 0 w CD Q z CD �H I1 V z H 1rw4-1 ui `W O CL CL z O H \Q LU J w uiV / Q 2 w O z Z. 0 H w a w F V1 ii z °� LU (D < z 0 (D U') < (D > LU LLJ ui ui UJ 0 0 V) lc6bl IC-1 1 3111mens SV 034011dd� ,4wNn wmj� 2 F-4 1. coo) • Attachment D 0 • RESOLUTION 21, 1998 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN OFFICE BUILDING ON A 5.31 ACRE LOT WITHIN THE REGIONAL CENTER DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; PROVIDING FOR WAIVERS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens has received an application to approve a site plan for the construction of 76,112 square -feet of office on a 5.31 + /- acre site within the Regional Center Development of Regional Impact; and WHEREAS, the City's Growth Management Department has determined that approval of said application is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA. Section 1_ The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens hereby approves a site plan • for the construction of 76,112 square -feet of office facility on 5 3 l +/- acres at the northeast corner of PGA Boulevard and Fairchild Gardens Avenue within the Regional Center Development of Regional Impact. Section 2 Construction of said development shall be in accordance with following plans on file with the City's Growth Management Department* I March 4, 1998, Site Plan, Smith and Moore Architects, INC , Sheet A -1. 2 March 4, 1998, Site Plan with Adjacent Properties, Smith and Moore Architects, INC , Sheet A -2 3 February 27, Zoning Map, Future Land Use 2010 Map, Vicinity Map, Project Identification Sign, Dumpster Enclosure Details, Dumpster Enclosure Wall Detail, Parking Stall Detail, Smith and Moore Architects, INC: , Sheet A -3 • 4. February 27, 1998, Building Elevations, Smith and Moore Architects, INC., Sheet FEW,] 5. February 27, 1998, Building Elevations, Smith and Moore Architects, INC , Sheet A -5 6 March 5, 1998, Landscape Plan, Howard F Ostrout Jr, and Associates, Sheet L -1 7 March 5, 1998, Landscape Legend/ Planting Diagrams & Specifications, Howard F Ostrout Jr , and Associates, Sheet L -2. 8 March 2, 1998, Paving and Drainage Details, LTL Associates, INC , Sheet 4 of 5 9 March 2, 1998, Paving and Drainage Notes, LTL Associates, INC., Sheet 5 of 5 10 March 4, 1998, Paving and Drainage Plan, LTL Associates, INC., Sheet 3 of 5. 11. March 4, 1998, Horizontal Control Plan, LTL Associates, INC., Sheet 2 of 5 • Section 3 Said site plan approval shall comply with the following condition. 1 Prior to the issuance of the Building Permit, the applicant is required to obtain a Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District Permit 2 Prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit, the petitioner shall provide public access dedication for the proposed sidewalk connecting PGA Boulevard to the Gardens Mall 3 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the petitioner shall provide updated plans deleting all references to covered parking Section 4 The following waivers are hereby granted with this approval- Resolution 21, 1998 40 Page 2 r� �J I Waiver of the requirement pertaining to the number of loading spaces, 2 Waiver of the requirement pertaining to the dimensions of the parking stalls, 3. Waiver of the requirement pertaining to the building height limit; 4 Waiver of the requirements pertaining to the front setback for the signs and the requirement pertaining to the location of the wall signs. Section 5. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS I6AY OF ARCH. 1998 60— AUSSO, MAYOR ATTEST LINDA V KOSIER VOTE MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR FURTADO COUNCILMAN SABATELLO COUNCILMAN JABLIN COUNCILMAN CLARK \bk planning: \shortr-- 1 \sp9718 re Resolution 21, 1998 Page 3 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY CITY ATTORNEY AYE NAY ABSENT ✓ ✓ t✓ • L • E777����� - L__J ie5 1 ® I a„ f f I 11 6 o riiu iii° l r � r a I; I RCH7LD GARDENS AVENUE fA1 07--7 yf I I I I II �$u F C/3 4 zz I'1 '1 : 11, 1 1 . I' 9 P Q ,,.x? ... °•,. < -.£�s; cap,,..: , ...,bwmfs? i <l?�. �.�r.'S�t..:A .t.s,rWmrt,�`.`�Fs..urt�e3e�.�' n4 ti ,...� .!' :�"i�.t�. � � -s,.. vmiiLna'dtadiivo iova9lrYr� l - .Q . LO'lL v.,e � r,'d' `: • ouain�nf � a• aaaoa�ar � I . F C/3 4 zz I'1 '1 : 11, 1 1 . I' 9 P Q ,,.x? ... °•,. < -.£�s; cap,,..: , ...,bwmfs? i <l?�. �.�r.'S�t..:A .t.s,rWmrt,�`.`�Fs..urt�e3e�.�' n4 ti ,...� .!' :�"i�.t�. � � -s,.. . "Ara '• O_I.11._.1._IIY.O�!■N !1 III relll �� I�I�IO ■0 ■iill� ■ii■1 ■iill�MII vra III ■�11� ■�� ■��'1b1 ®� _ .d[I■._�0_I 0 i 11 R ■ ®1O ■wlON ME IN IIN MimIIDI. .0eI = _I_l l mm� m �7_■ [ I.I 10.E lO CI■1[ Ii■m■iiI101Om ■ER 0101■0111a1�� ■11:1111110111IIDIC[ __. [I. ._I I0._.� =_.l I.C�._I1Y._._ 0�:1[II�:� ■�:II01�1� ■E111 ■t ■■o11a1L�+ �i1:1[� ■iim ■11:1101��] -_. [I._M._1.10.gE __. [ I.__._I I O.� m ■�:I111IN MnLI01 =.1 ■111 ■� ■�Ila I.1[IIIN ' I.IID Immil I® mill ii ' i �el ■lI H. 4 k 4 -, jAw i�l �I t Y i i r i k i CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD Agenda Cover Memorandum Date Prepared: June 18, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: MISC- 07 -01- 000022 Subiect/Agenda Item: Petition MISC- 07 -01- 000022 - PGA Financial Plaza Building Signage Waiver Recommendation to City Council: A request by Bertie Russo, agent, on behalf of Twenty - Fifth Palm Beach, LLC, for approval of a waiver to allow four tenant signs to be located above the second floor line of the northeast and southwest elevations of the PGA Financial Plaza Building (f.k.a. MacArthur Center Office Building), located at 3399 PGA Boulevard, within the Regional Center Development of Regional Impact (DRI). ] Recommendation to APPROVE r X 1 Recommendation to DENY Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Finance Dept.: Planning, Zoning, & Growth Management: N/A Appeals Board City Attorney: Project Allan Owens Action: Manager: Jackie Holl an, AICP Administrator [ ] Recommend Aprvl. Christine P. Tatum, Esq. Planner Bu' ' counts t: [ ] Rec. Approval with/ Development Compliance: conditions N/A [ ] Recommend Denial Bahareh K. Wolfs, AICP Ketty Labossiere [ ] Continued to: Principal Planner: ( X ] Quasi - Judicial Fees Paid: [ X ]Yes [ ] Legislative [ ] Public Hearing Todd Miller, AI Funding Source: Planning & Zoning Director: [ ] Operating [X] Other NA Talal M. Benothman, AICP Growth anagement Budget #: Acct. Attachments: Admi i ator: Advertised: No NA A - Applicant's Request 4 Date: Paper: w /photographs B — Location Map Ka Irwin, AICP ( X ] Not Required C — Existing & Proposed Approved By: Signage Public Notice: D - Resolution 21, 1998 City Manager: [ ] Yes wlapproved Site Plan & [ X ] Not required Elevations Ronald M. Ferris Date Prepared: June 18, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: MISC- 07 -01- 000022 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The subject petition is a waiver request from Section 78 -285 of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs) to allow the display of four tenant signs above the second -story floor line of the northeast and southwest elevations of the PGA Financial Center (f.k.a./ MacArthur Center Office Building). There are already two existing building identification signs with the words "Chase" and a "Chase" logo on these same elevations. It is staff's professional opinion that Section 78 -285, Table 24, "Flat/Wall Sign for Ground Floor Users," is intended to address signage for those retail tenants who are located on the ground floor and have separate entrances into retail buildings and commercial shopping centers. Staff typically has no objection to more than one building identification sign, when adequately justified, provided the signs have the same name and are for the same tenant. However, it is staff's professional opinion that multiple signs for different tenants on office buildings create an undesirable and cluttered appearance. Furthermore, it is staffs opinion that multiple signs for a multitude of tenants is contrary to the intent of the City's LDR regarding tenant signage. In addition, such signs constitute a form of advertising instead of providing a means of "way finding" to a particular destination. Therefore, staff does not support this waiver request. BACKGROUND On March 19, 1998, the City Council adopted Resolution 21, 1998, which approved the development of a four -story, 76,112 square -foot office building known as the MacArthur Center Office Building, located within the Regional Center DRI at 3300 PGA Boulevard. The approval included waivers pertaining to the 62 -foot building height, the front setback for the ground sign, and the location of the two existing building identification wall signs above the second floor line. LAND USE AND ZONING The subject site is within the Regional Center DRI and has a future land -use designation of Professional Office (PO). The zoning district classification is Planned Community District Overlay (PCD) with an underlying zoning of Professional Office (PO). SIGNAGE REQUEST The four tenant signs are proposed to be located between the second and third stories on the northeast and southwest elevations of the PGA Financial Plaza. In a letter dated May 16, 2007, the applicant discusses the reasons the application is in compliance with a majority of the criteria contained in Section 78- 158(1) of the City's LDR. (Please see Attachment A.) In another letter dated April 24, 2007 (Attachment A) the applicant states the names of the future tenants are not known at this time. However, as leases expire, they wish to offer 1 Date Prepared: June 18, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: MISC- 07 -01- 000022 signage identification to prospective tenants in order to be competitive with other office buildings along PGA Boulevard. Furthermore, the applicant states there is a need for visibility from PGA Boulevard, which would help promote and better market their businesses. Sign Details The proposed signs consist of 24" high, internally illuminated, letters. The signs will match the color and font of the existing "Chase" building identification wall signs, which are white with blue channels or edges. Waiver Request: City Code Allowed Proposed Waiver Requested Staff Recommendation Section 78 -285, 1 per tenant space or 4 tenant wall signs To allow 4 tenant Denial (1) Table 24: bay. No maximum displayed between the signs displayed above Permanent number. 2nd &3 d stories of the the 2nd floor lines on Signs: northeast and the northeast and Flat/Wall Sign Signs shall not be southwest elevations southwest elevations for Ground located above second Floor Users floor line or above building parapet. Sign must face ROW or primary entrance. Uniform type, color, material, shape & style. Letters NMT 24 inches. Max. 2 lines of copy. NMT 5% of area of elevation of tenant space or bay. (1) Staff Analysis: Section 78 -285, Table 24, "Flat/Wall Sign for Ground Floor Users," is intended to address signage for retail users located on the ground floor with separate entrances into retail buildings and commercial shopping centers. Staff normally has no objection to more than one building identification sign, when adequately justified, provided the signs have the same name, and are for the same tenant. It is staff's professional opinion that multiple signs for different tenants create an undesirable and cluttered appearance. Furthermore, such signs constitute a form of advertising instead of providing a means of "way finding" to a particular destination. 3 Date Prepared: June 18, 2007 Meeting Date: July 10, 2007 Petition: MISC- 07 -01- 000022 It is staff's goal to protect the integrity of the PGA Boulevard corridor, consistent with the requirements and intent of Section 78 -221 of the City's LDR. Specifically, the intent of these guidelines is to create a unique, high quality and special identity for this boulevard. The guidelines also call for the preservation of the visual character of the corridor. However, permitting an increase in the number of signs on traditional office buildings along PGA Boulevard is incompatible with the character of the corridor. Therefore, for the reasons stated above, staff recommends denial of this waiver request. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends DENIAL of Petition MISC- 07 -01- 000022. Jh /Case Files /PGA Financial Center /PGA Financial Center files /Staff report PZAB.doc 4 Attachment A Attachment B PGA Financial Center -. 362 3630 3630 WO { 11802 3620 3620 �o0 3610 3610 11700 DOWNTOWN AT GARDENS 3503 NK 138,01 � tt50�1 1505' D1 34013401 1 to 11360 11370 1385 11340 113450 11345 f4 11340 11330 11320 11295 OACItAV 130 1310 11285 , 11310 11: C► 11290 3561 0.11290 X11280 11199 1 1280 I s -I 11260 3503 Copyright (c)2007 City of Palm Beach Garden- Aj 642�e'1 1819 ft 1019'1101 PGA Financial Center _1013101 310131013101 3 01 3101 31f 3101 3101 3101' 31010131015 IC31013101 91M 3101 3101 1010 3101 3101 31013101 3101 ' 3101 013101 3101 `__u!a0W310t013t0 M3399 3196 300 3001 1 3001 RGA LV8 R. 3188 , 11 Page 1 of 1 2989 �� u 3160 1 M DISCLAII All inform without ei used as intended Printed: C Attachment C Z _OW F- O > Z W (� J W U) �.o (n W WO r IL I- O O CL J u.i, z OW 1= C� as >z Lu W� (n W W () �O = n- �O on- U) 0 LLI J U �u w C7 a z z I-- X w 0 LU O a a z O a w J W a LL O z i z a w a w F. ow� x; ae zzz f l vw LU (D z (D IM Ul) P--1 x LU 0 ui 0 DC CL z 0 LLJ -1 LU F- V) W 3: r D 0 U) MMON4 SW 03AOVddV O Fr Attachment D N RESOLUTION 21, 1998 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN OFFICE BUILDING ON A 5.31 ACRE LOT WITHIN THE REGIONAL CENTER DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; PROVIDING FOR WAIVERS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens has received an application to approve a site plan for the construction of 76,112 square -feet of office on a 5.31 + /- acre site within the Regional Center Development of Regional Impact; and WHEREAS, the City's Growth Management Department has determined that approval of said application is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA. Section 1_ The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens hereby approves a site plan for the construction of 76,112 square -feet of office facility on 5 31 +/- acres at the northeast corner of PGA Boulevard and Fairchild Gardens Avenue within the Regional Center Development of Regional Impact. Section 2 Construction of said development shall be in accordance with following plans on file with the City's Growth Management Department, I March 4, 1998, Site Plan, Smith and Moore Architects, INC , Sheet A -1. 2 March 4, 1998, Site Plan with Adjacent Properties, Smith and Moore Architects, INC . Sheet A -2 3 February 27, Zoning Map, Future Land Use 2010 Map, Vicinity Map, Project Identification Sign, Dumpster Enclosure Details, Dumpster Enclosure Wall Detail, Parking Stall Detail, Smith and Moore Architects, INC , Sheet A -3 4. February 27, 1998, Building Elevations, Smith and Moore Architects, INC., Sheet A -4 5. February 27, 1998, Building Elevations, Smith and Moore Architects, INC , Sheet FEW 6 March 5, 1998, Landscape Plan, Howard F Ostrout Jr, and Associates, Sheet L -1 7 March 5, 1998, Landscape Legend/ Planting Diagrams & Specifications, Howard F Ostrout Jr , and Associates, Sheet L -2. 8 March 2, 1998, Paving and Drainage Details, LTL Associates, INC , Sheet 4 of 5 9 March 2, 1998, Paving and Drainage Notes, LTL Associates, INC., Sheet 5 of 5 10 March 4, 1998, Paving and Drainage Plan, LTL Associates, INC., Sheet 3 of 5. 11. March 4, 1998, Horizontal Control Plan, LTL Associates, INC., Sheet 2 of 5 Section 3 Said site plan approval shall comply with the following condition. 1 Prior to the issuance of the Building Permit, the applicant is required to obtain a Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District Permit 2 Prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit, the petitioner shall provide public access dedication for the proposed sidewalk connecting PGA Boulevard to the Gardens Mall 3 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the petitioner shall provide updated plans deleting all references to covered parking Section 4 The following waivers are hereby granted with this approval- Resolution 21, 1998 Page 2 I 1 Waiver of the requirement pertaining to the number of loading spaces, 2 Waiver of the requirement pertaining to the dimensions of the parking stalls, 3. Waiver of the requirement pertaining to the building height limit, 4 Waiver of the requirements pertaining to the front setback for the signs and the requirement pertaining to the location of the wall signs. Section 5. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS �6AY OF ARCH . 1998 �—� _ r (JO AUSSO, MAYOR ATTEST LINDA V KOSIER • / ,- VOTE MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR FURTADO COUNCILMAN SABATELLO COUNCILMAN JABLIN COUNCILMAN CLARK \bk planning: \shortr-- 1 \sp9718 re Resolution 21, 1998 Page 3 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY CITY ATTORNEY AYE NAY ABSENT fl iIH.LAI�� iIf1H.Li�b'�`dW � Q m a'7�av� W R V o� E aa 441 3/ 4;/ Y; ,' a/s ekt- c, o , c nni 4c �/ \el, r a / � eP y �3 1_ i �eyf N Z 3 .ac�.sz Skkikk 4 4 k F 8:8�IN i v3x y3 . . _ 4 i B 1`.1 1jEFl jfo, jfOF, u r 3� vii k�gF6�$$' W R V o� E aa 441 3/ 4;/ Y; ,' a/s ekt- c, o , c nni 4c �/ \el, r a / � eP y �3 1_ i �eyf N Z 3 .ac�.sz Vii,: i I � I I I I I MVMMMI&'1�11071 O I II a y k d I� u r n 1 84 dP .. i l e t I I R I I I •' i � I I' "I I i �I IL I` I I I I • IW e li `J I I 3 I � Vii,: i I � I I I I I MVMMMI&'1�11071 O I II a y k d I� .. vmuaAt'Armaavo rovae Erna -�,zp� +��;;9� iI�1.N�� �If]Fi.L2IHJt�IN `°J'� � Ewa Mow, yo- z I\ � 1 1 1 1 i 1 � 1 I I , I I I I 1 I � � I � i I I� � II I I � I II I II zzo ,_ b w� A F � a .. 11 i i i 'd3LAI3D MaR L2IVDdYQ me am 7 +.wlloelYw 6 BS�S,`�y n�allnan� sr a3�oy��r C w r �r FL�.L�Ii111,��1 !" � ■ ■IEI ■ ® ■ ■ ®IIIaI�® �!�'lI ■'� ■ ■I�lIlO�Mawl � ■�IEI ■ ®■ ®IIIaI�■ �� ■i:fll ■i: ■�ia�lOt! °l IN IN IillO� !�l �— t■1'EI ■ ■ ■■■Illal�■ LIN'i[I ■!� ■ ■lNII01 l�tiiil ' �� ■'[L��.�lil0 ■�api �I�1[I ■I °° ■ ■I�rl�le�l ■iEl ■ ■ ■■ ■1118 �■ ii�[I ■Ii ■ ■iil�0��� !I� ■ ■IiEI ■ ■■I■ ■FIAT ■■ iii:�ll ■ii�iail����� ���■ f I�I�IA.�1�I n■���■ ;K y 4 it)', Ni I if b a�€ A 41 " A 611 'it S W pw 3 � P- AWA, ..�t�r 4,� YJyr J .; ray ��. „� j,\ �., i, s 3 r s4fA r .1 u� k ^,4 x,1;5! s' *� yes I,III I p ID ! ! I ID ;K y 4 it)', Ni I if b a�€ A 41 " A 611 'it S W pw 3 � P- AWA, ..�t�r 4,� YJyr J .; ray ��. „� j,\ �., i, s 3 r s4fA r .1 u� k ^,4 x,1;5! s' *� yes I NJ /„�, �OLIIII�.IIOL�II�I��l Imm 1 � 11 op M-m mills l!iim ■ ON ! I IN ISM no MM OEM iillmmmm= C'oIN l=i[iii'oM I I NEIIIEN mill i,millill, IN IM1,11 IN IN �ol ME SEEM[ 101:1 H ■ 011 m mill 101111 IN IN of INS INN 101111 IN U 00=0 • IN 1111l NJ MOVIE[ I. JUNE I NJ PRN CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS , . 10500 N. MILITARY TRAIL • PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410 -4698 IMF` MEMORANDUM DATE: July 10, 2007 TO: Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board Members FROM: Growth Management Department SUBJECT: Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board Meeting Tuesday, July 10, 2007 - 6:30 P.M. Enclosed is the agenda containing the items to be presented on Tuesday, July 10, 2007. This meeting will be held in the Council Chambers, Palm Beach Gardens Municipal Building, 10500 North Military Trail, beginning at 6:30 p.m. Enclosed with this memorandum are the following items: 1. An agenda for the meeting; and 2. A compact disc containing PowerPoint presentations 3. A Growth Management Department staff report for the items to be heard. As always, the respective Project Managers' telephone numbers and e-mail addresses have been provided in case you have any questions or require additional information on any petition. This will help us offer better staff support in the review of these applications. Nina Sorenson, Administrative Specialist II, will call to confirm your attendance. Growth Management Administrator for 7I ° m m mj ,a � I iWl -Q'WI� s I I� AlD y� g1nlm �n Flo oim F � �la 22 O y � Al�j jm l_.cgN v r �Id 'IT A2 �iN W< Zz IpIdO 9 OI m ° lazy N O va °O 't 10 yy 9N^�Y 03 r ° Pic� g�4 I I m I z I' m 66 �. a l (C .lam v, 1n fy'ti �+ A HF 4 � L 9 3 W� g n 0 oc m�?o�mZ ag �nyvi g° �O\ 3 E 0 A [Q��+ O O jG( JO $o 12 a N i OJ i I I i S� x a a 7 syo?ti 1 C �t�m o °H O n�1FmY$ z n m• ��aP A �K�Piz2 s = =g�yy 'K�Riyr� O 2 Z a p 5 a m 0 CID D r-- _. s �vmgnoZ n• m� m N C � b � 3 9��ozm 00 � 5y ,g=2 rO o sA N ^ g s S P P Q^ m _s j ~s °gz A � � g 30 b A `V n � Q 00 J�yz$ ii �_ �jn r' a 8� a Gz x iii -Pim �jn CQm �j�"o m &yPm �<at�Bm��P,mm� 3 WmPrQQ °P P R O Nyy Q6 G O S S 2 00�5r (1 "i. AAa A Aj>� OS OG,m -�nm y ° P j�n PI aN �8 s 8� 8'oQ� oim 4 �OCyOOVpoQ OZA R f- i� ib \cy d Z �b �d Rim 4 I i l ; n ► I° s � c] C -7ardens Plaza(PUV) 0 O ?` `' Palm Beach Gardens Florida m V ;CpB Z - �gpQ �g s f- i� ib \cy d Z �b �d Rim 4 I i l ; n ► I° C -7ardens Plaza(PUV) 0 O ?` `' Palm Beach Gardens Florida r on�V��a� � m n A m m AToRaypF` T FAIRCHILD GARDENS AVENUE ptio �= 2 c O 0 � I m m I I n ° 41 �- (D M It u o � z � I i n Z �It 5 ",X i Zn T off• �'° 47 Lo y O A mH 2 � � = N Km zi p R Y 22 s m N A� aY r t V T zz F mwo 1-0 GARDENS AVENUE o3s N o . z o � � � g z N 0_ F� 0 2� 4� s� �F m� 3 m= 919 °" "Sim a� o SR �s Z - �K g� S r O x QUp P J 3 � J r1 '� {n c+c Yn' O yT YbQQr � > A Zxo�SS c� - J i� i2svZGptga ✓! 4� D T� O S P S�f[�!^(1 C T g'sg �~ ?Aq p Sg > 6 -g eii �� >v 19 Q €4 Si[i b s NT � 0 81 Ii 0 rL o Gardens Plaza (PUV) /� lV Q + a a I `' m Palirn Beach Gardens Florida m ��gGn A r rn I ' I I I W 1 5 ",X i Zn T off• �'° 47 Lo y O A mH 2 � � = N Km zi p R Y 22 s m N A� aY r t V T zz F mwo 1-0 GARDENS AVENUE o3s N o . z o � � � g z N 0_ F� 0 2� 4� s� �F m� 3 m= 919 °" "Sim a� o SR �s Z - �K g� S r O x QUp P J 3 � J r1 '� {n c+c Yn' O yT YbQQr � > A Zxo�SS c� - J i� i2svZGptga ✓! 4� D T� O S P S�f[�!^(1 C T g'sg �~ ?Aq p Sg > 6 -g eii �� >v 19 Q €4 Si[i b s NT � Ii 0 rL Gardens Plaza (PUV) /� lV Q + a d .C+ `' Palirn Beach Gardens Florida m n eQ Ln Ln � w �S A 0 1 I I I I S r, / d/ i� a Z ® FR �`n 0 Izz n O1 \ O I _ g v �b O ` � I v 3 � oE� FAIRCHILD GARDENS AVENUE { m x2 4 m� �I �I s i t I .. ................. J. �J- jqq�ja OI of cq i - 0= I TT FT L nm 0, ^ea =o 0��m��y O •gip :�, �..$��� p pn� m y+�Magi faj p•ftop�2 s >s c � ZIR D�> n < yjg� ;=� i 0 v m O m y Jan sY�^' m i - T RS�m ig� a• YN Z �m rn C, i n ti yip$p �m 4t X'O c z 0 p m z g M m %:1 Y 3 h gN$ > N a ti =aA� fi otiz h Z � n mNV� oR FA�R�N��O GARDENS AVENGE `n) Ild]I. 0 m 8 2 3 g 3 n p a n cam= o� dg fF z C] O If ss �� f g° g 190 m 2 a ic A 3y N ° �pJI n O 2 O O In b lC/� o ? m g= S2 't T °Fp ? a o u w8 8Q c � ? x o V ; W p Gardens Plaza(PUV) 2 a Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 2 Oi of d a i ' P n m c n m = _ y <N A 2 O O AQ m C a Q f°r bi. �QRQ m D^ A n NO I R1 SP C a �s i J c 6 o ° e R 0 A m T n n n mog O> A D ap gg 7 C O H O C 2 VJ 0 Z O C y O 2 d y 11 ti !I 0--o Z =O .0 C m D O� <> T z O r ;m m z Zm <Z < Dp �a ` Sc o X ~ Aa m n= �y c� n i N z zp m C: Z O C y O 2 d y 11 ti I o� m 2 O � � A y D Z m _ N i N A R I 3 °� m mm yQ, 1 � ;R a €gym �A m�,z T � m N 1 14 !I 0--o Z =O .0 C Zz D O� <> T z O r ;m m z Zm <Z < Dp b ` Sc o X ~ Aa m n= �y c� n i N z zp m C: I o� m 2 O � � A y D Z m _ N i N A R I 3 °� m mm yQ, 1 � ;R a €gym �A m�,z T � m N 1 14 d T a .1] D mz Dc >N =E o-i mC) —'D i� !I z�Am Z =O .0 C s a s? p 1 al(� <> mz nz 0'. o ^ m =z to mz ,� y P' - m r I� 0 9 D ri b oor ~ Aa m n= �y STANDARD `y PARKING SPACE i N z i .. v yIi lox i� � STANDARD `� N gA, 1�. PARKING SPACE i 9 � 8 T f d T a .1] D mz Dc >N =E o-i mC) —'D i� A m I P o I ppA 4 2 n Z F � O 2 �D N pp m b z�Am Z =O .0 C s a s? p = <> z timNf g r I� A m I P o I ppA 4 2 n Z F � O 2 �D N pp m b d y r I� U �a h� a y - STANDARD u I PARKIN s SPACE - -- -1 <> O s timNf g i I� 0 9 D IAm f E R P 6I=mIm ~ Aa m n= �y d y r I� U �a h� a y - STANDARD u I PARKIN s SPACE - -- -1 I a m i I� Gadr -cfens Plaza (PUD)� > IAm f E R 6I=mIm ~ Aa m n= �y STANDARD `y PARKING SPACE i N z i .. yIi i� STANDARD `� N gA, 1�. PARKING SPACE i 9 � 8 1a�5 mw = a m i I� Gadr -cfens Plaza (PUD)� 6I=mIm Palm Beach Gardens, Florida STANDARD `y PARKING SPACE '•�T�`.1 i� STANDARD `� \ 1�. PARKING SPACE i B 1a�5 mw r��3N I i Gadr -cfens Plaza (PUD)� 6I=mIm Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 1-55,. z � �z N Ci= Z,Z / G m PROENS R m ^arm IUD � 5 Cn " ° V; NJ I■e it z 0 I� ro n Z b C �j I� 36 �i 7 g i oA 2 $n 6 ° .D � D z O C r rn D 1 � Am � i a�� m i Ypp� m i AP 9B ^y 3 3 F N� �7? � l J v �. �i 'k 5 ,�., R ° ° Gardens Plaza (PUD) /T A Q 4� Palm Beach Gardens, Florida u N � N N N N C) rl� c�tia aaa� �C C Ca yZ O a �o F Q cn o -4 I� b 0 a a z -T - - -._ I a @' m �a3� 3 6,31-ilens P1Plaza (PUV)-- Palm Beach Gardens, Florida II�� =mom 0 AT 2 i' 1 #AST 4r �■1 -xxYa� � F ° F N 44 Fg � �' b Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 0 O a mu Lun y 'ICI i� r g g ptq S t 5 T A T d � oQ Efi ��lR iY Xg ^RAAiCCCAAA'f ;ax- a�gtas;,g c -Ys z� ",.�si�" "�a��c..s "aA6i� =E�Rga 3'0 x _.......... ",. "..., .. ........ ... .._ win n.. .. ...... .. ...... �o r. -k �w �g��ta��s�e•yrgl;ttrg�Ec. ",xs•. I�.- N:a.c ".,.._ "..�... .r. �;,b, C R gig I n co 5i 4��vYV: o o �y�Y99��P9pH on000nn��n o0 E�EEE�E��EE�EE, a QQ�$Q�QQQ �I %r Z��ry4y�7iF,Mky NYY NYY nooH000 'nonnn EUEE E lg�ill U H PWM11199? mija §11111QQQQQQ3�QQ3ttQQ�� C HU P a ��uM � Q N NNNONNNNNNY�MNNNN aifs X38 4 � ii21, C :i CL nFjii -m4 CCS sNo-di> M Pq rti v! 1 a 0 s�G G6 's'' Idols D ID, � y e . a• a� a: b� :.uis ?6 :� �� tit �� +,f °. 9�Y ^ � $R ■R �� :�S sr AZ { 9i 5 9A i 8 {$ 8di Rig Sf l @f C 6a St a- _pY S R �� S� � lY a K k r is i. SAY■ � K R' $X ��g�6 *^ R e : � { C .. � , 9 � K4 ■4 4A�P4q .� g�'f _ •7 5 v :. 3� � R •aR �s' K S'__ ,� gre r'lf: p s£ 6Yx x ■ � _ a g e n S> � rr5 ;¢t sg$p rz v, a X ■F � �7� "�� �sy far R e � �L� r � �Z �c.a"R� � � f. �d � � ■i � �ti�� �ba° k � � 'e� s� yRs ; ♦a$� �� � Q Pe�� � �� � }9 gq � E sc� yr 6 � �iE i�� °:.S 4{ "v��• 81 9Z1'9 ¢P ia�i i �RE 6F q ` =o a o °� q ■ a 'L(g � �' "5: � � � a` �RBAJ� "F R ��t �k� Ki ➢�_ 6 R '�� ¢ e s�:y t 4f � }�i ^y'a�9a� Nrap V Zli 44 G,3ra(ens1?1i3Z,3 (PUD)� �- �' b Palm Beach Gardens, Florida A I 1 0 CO ZZ CD u m 2! V) r'n O m 2!.IZ oN > rn m zo 0 ;o 0 m i / 71A AN/1, /,�� ,/ , ,: 4, 16– PI ............. ... - - - - -- - -- — --- 0 --I 0 Ln rn OTT.- ;pir Ga,rclens Plaza (PUD) I� ail Palm Beach Gardens, Florida o a 00 0 O N �j m� �r w + w UI 0 n � ttto \ o E \ v H m � r r I 1 t Q D m OD � m m y c �zm �m m � om of { 5 � m n m o Y 4 o s Monet Office Building 3a� Palm Beach Gardens, Florida OXw Conceptual Landscape Plan133 3a r Z r M O O 1 D T� N m v m a D z v 0 00 M0 vc 0z Cv —10 =j0 z< Om cn cn v r z Z C) m v M v M gmVv m; RpmItp89 a �mCA �C CTw C4 ;1�A A �r � �CQmOm wCE�j o <Ot Pm�O�FF< CO �cc<A'6 £ z i�ow oF; 5m4 mar A °Ni mF FN ; w m m Doti10 $R mZ0 mAm mw m0 m O pmo m �O f $m fill, Ijliar, Ella fit ` r.n 1 � I �6 f 1 6 i L z N D r D r m r Z ^Z LI J r V I V I oCo r z ^z Y / 0 I 7 --a 1 EIO M m� ; Nuu mmN�9Nm N r 93Z m~ 09ATnC 'ot iron° mss ON- C ; 9 COm zym mEiq myy i ? Nor ;� "° x$` m °3 €y� xmm 'm� ° �< ZrVppa T Z m Cr m r2 pO�iO xZ ,i �A m�pNOy `nyp rm m mOm i_ ^p11 b r°C0 8 z�m ;O ° "i3f Nmm `: >' m Fr 3 °C ° 09> Z$�g` Ax> rnr 4; m^ z i,°iy� - sN � ^FyOZ� �AT� �� 9OF Yd.' O R >9 SZ�Z F >A N yyDmN m�0� y8N yp 0° aF oSQ p A sr . t NT Z! r CCCC c ro zz ° rnm �W 4 N M 8 N FOR a' �N M m Icy S O O Q N A r m O u C , << y m ° 8 c$ O � m "g O p N A o 9 00 ; O 9O = Z 20 O n O Q~ = z . ' > 00 yS sr T O O y a F m p �p z, ip4 x E 8� Z A .1 S O $ m. > A! A P D yyy ' ypp yy y O C Z Z z 11 "O T m w- �iZ ;42';rvzfir >m- i g ^ ? z o -zi z QP A N �T m rnm �W 4 N M 8 N FOR a' �N M m Icy S O C Monet Oice Bquildin ^' o WPalm Beach Gardens, Florida r Details N N M C D 90 9 C r 1 ry m TTI :, /V OC CC zD vz o° M r O mF pgs �ATm 08 AA AF mx m� ry r0 F pappAm 5m OOOp m N o to �Nt x k y N upr O ; A T smip me m N oz o Z m o H-s$ 3 S Dram �^ _= N A f-y11 a. m QC T r CA N °C m NAr N pN C w � i m "z s7 Z OyA 2 c Z ti Z N A m �z m k<m F° O �yH a OOL <Z O C U izm 0000Z "� �m i Ali mm iy r$ O mmZ z0 "O of C9pZ•p+ RI 'w rgwm� mm+� OCrw ?m $x mz O" SpSpmxByy A~ >mZ N D O �Owc O> w z Z w yy m < Cm1 Q? mp myAy 2p; �Q m �m•�.4 RR yoy y tpZC m L <mm Z yy GAA n ya ;� z yTgjO O� ONNNA m r4DS C u O m< '" Dxm SD T< � m "g 2 C�v ppl1 yi AO,> 00 wSC Z 20 61J jymyF Z TA mo (nom = m Opam 8 0 M C) Amm m. W m �0�y�U�UnA °myamiTB .�o ZFA �' "'o'4'z ^yiAmsoym •y 0- m 8 $ m m w- �iZ ;42';rvzfir >m- i g ^ ? z o -zi z _y yA> $� N �T m O C Monet Oice Bquildin ^' o WPalm Beach Gardens, Florida r Details N N M C D 90 9 C r 1 ry m TTI :, /V OC CC zD vz o° M r O mF pgs �ATm 08 AA AF mx m� ry r0 F pappAm 5m OOOp m N o to �Nt x k y N upr O ; A T smip me m N oz o Z m o H-s$ 3 S Dram �^ _= N A f-y11 a. m QC T r CA N °C m NAr N pN C w � i m "z s7 Z OyA 2 c Z ti Z N A m �z m k<m F° O �yH a OOL <Z O C U izm 0000Z "� �m i Ali mm iy r$ O mmZ z0 "O of C9pZ•p+ RI 'w rgwm� mm+� OCrw ?m $x mz O" SpSpmxByy A~ >mZ N D O �Owc O> w z Z w yy m < Cm1 Q? mp myAy 2p; �Q m �m•�.4 RR yoy y tpZC m L <mm Z yy GAA n ya ;� z yTgjO O� N D ONNNA m r4DS O A >N>ms u O m< '" Dxm SD T< � m "g OrrFpmo ;mOND C�v ppl1 yi AO,> 00 wSC mm; 20 P jymyF -r�i ArA =D TA mo (nom = m Opam 8 mC o= M 0_�_g OkiA y Amm m. m" .�o ZFA ZO •y 0- m 8 $ m m w- �iZ � z V r $� m m A O ; z O {l > )pr ACC A n Z gl�z 2m i my A O S Fv yLQ m r°k [s ZO 7 n !n ° r, N D tiO 09 0 z mrN �F S 9i 6 S � i g I ;s1H II :e 1 mm � r v� ' w p m cv, �c m= ' � m "g L E�¢S� %�• � 9 m m P v$ N r S02 mm°oc N m m o m" N •y 0- m 8 $ m rO z Z < x z m z O {l > )pr ACC A n tiO 09 0 z mrN �F S 9i 6 S � i g I ;s1H II :e 1 mm � r v� ' w p m cv, �c nk e�i a1 ��8m3 3 a � E�¢S� %�• � 9 m P ^D� om� v �O D N m z N W W • • • fi`ISm'os mu:• $ns a ° -'?'A •o 5 D U J• ?Qt mPo� � g c to . x m �ad b c d J$ i C q O c D > dN d3 S �° ? 8`�c ?w cc c] o- nn d n- iv S �m om ' $ o#`m 5� J �4 m$�3 , .5 S g`d . .• 7 m fA aJ F °a _' $ $Q Sy R a wW J 7 °9 .' w �p io a 'a m te d� zw o oR $J $ 3c Y PJ M. 8 d O o m D m q Q 3 8-w . j � P pp $r $ R r m 2 n r -� 9 4 Jdo n - Z m$ ' S �m g�^m $ m = J m A m ; c �owR rR Q_g y o _ �y Y �J-mR �_ g $=d f>3 •¢o$y �a- $ aJm-3 � w ]_ 8i 'w ^o c o0a1s .e q_ a . o d$ ma.< "�$$ �-o � g m N a m y H - wH J v3 0 $ ¢ - $ w m g� $"$1 :m 's _ m x $ O F g w H �-S • v m - -m c'" E F Z m oD O n a 0w d 1 npS w•v� J m $ 2$ v c$R O $ y T 'n >w • y yO 2 r z Y p- Z Jm O -D �9 Zm m G) yCz q 3m o _ 3 BE O 5 O o H o w g _.a� m S�`0 0 ° Q F �vmc $ � ]g _.g2 maomd� �° m n � ? $2'QQ�O `O mJ_ m$ 13 CT Y.2 $ m R Y n _. 0,2 S Qy�< da �Sni d �?.n $m _g_ �^ ML 3`bT �3 ad a's n a d t .'0 m F o7m s q $ . R v x ' n�S 3o . ' ° `° 0 Mgn3 � � w 3 0 3d o g �o 0_ J.00 30 o 3 W' W ° � " d°nE C a og NN B � S S y W a S a o a 0 $ 05 o �n x N O O m Y j 5 $ 4 � .g a 4 W W P$go Am o �v° o 'n m1o° o D f) y C) 8 Z Y& m 0 i° o' °- d o m R v 0 ti n o v aJ^ D aJ m c�< HN3� $ A �� 2 m orm 5 f� n� z5 m n m O a^ a3bT C'm'm X d gym' P v vo 0 (/m y nd iQmm$ . 3gd ?� wwr�a�m'0 -:pJ ^, to o< S Jy r dam J�$ °9 v m b' $ J m g ` ,< S N_ w< m R Sr V W < w n y fi: d$ O y y P y Z w J d Z o O c30 H -o $ J:, c N'A yw y my 3 i w °-'o•o $.m n�' Z no mm- t'oo db�„o az `nL1 yr F A a c �pJG S%X LF a-.•y q 7 07 o a4 J c� J: y 's P ate.- y a m a5 fn omw ; m n'-�$�y ~ a D 3 wo`� me nw Jp J ° m3� O RR y obi Pmm m2nY D aoo =m R' p ^� 3m3 do 3 my r 3. $O �$ 01 i�x°E m D m 3 3 3 m yr w z m o a J 3 a c f 3 ,2 n n S d D X _ v FF a Jc mq a oY m w 4 c 5 m 3� -ai c' d=r N $3`Bn wc_� aq W3 3 3 wo $ 53 m Jv yy+Pw 5.. F�N�� A w C g ~m q _g a� J $. m 7 m ci yy ] y�mmc 3o mP `I m� vm ] m S xc 7+, `m �'. �3a°r' n°,ZC p °- '��.'�3ar� O �.m`g 3 m 2�$`v.R'�3'�� A a N g -$ 2 c5 $m n•• •�'}R.Y °$o "= S�3v °_ 3d_d �'c.g iB'�o3n°Ym,n- X y$- mB�oct3oR9i�$n 5 B �. �_� }Q _amp Fm v x kgR n m °mw� SG (°�$ Ao<3a�mm�m3 w_'o w -ZI °v �+y x� y .. °-' r� N Qmr ��� j $ $i $J ag 3agm J Nry (� �p �l _ �Cp1 p 8 Q8j d ._ Q -. f y O ] d tD p D p Q W a 3 N w C� O �O 3. yy � 'S 6 d H �1 O^ ?� 4' � =. �� v7 �� N g p !li m� p m pJ •n Sw m m'3.m" °1 cad $o J. ^ -.$3g c� m$ o���m� -,$d& �� d RSA v cvv vP L+3fEm�_ !^3. 3J mmgt =94 SJ=�a5 �� R ��aa.33 .5 �v� "R g° 3 �'.J�$� �'' y �R.q �_°,� m ov y �C q 'SS o33. ='� $ 3.mo Oo $.E�$iYSvgy q p�3,Q�wmma'3g �:Q opt r �0?'3• N ° �' P 3 m m =n 3 t�i`.3 09 qc° �3 dv�v� mN. � �g d yyr�mpp���.�$w.. H o $aN 4 6.. 2 s ^H3h.5 3 Q''pp�' j a$ o m owv n 5`$F �aQ ��Nma - mww-'*-m a N $ Ong �i ol°"cX3 mn D,do$oi53 $m '� SPm -]c m�_. �r3n $Q J �<v?aA $ @. � o m $ m� �•x�$^�� o°�'mO J_$mn'�vm .5 $ dQ'� amm�y m M ° 3 3'j r'�SSi <$ - $ of ^'$Sao_° -3' a � < ° ?Y $d a g$Om a_�i 3°� $Em y a$W �gd eTTVia�$ y a � ^�m $� d n w3 $mm H $� �'� $ mau R dy.$ d d < �� °.mw_ d R< m - o= $J m $r 3 of)a 3mR.P BF p2mn. $Sy(o.H'J d c'°<ammOmul<b' ? m j.o ]01y$mfa$ ryryp py � 5' �m� y m^ 01 lD w J j d d 0' O ( wp d .0.1 C +� _ SO> - y' Q S^ S. w w m w° 3 a t ry d m C w (pd� f7i Y d m�,n Y p S m Q 01 t' w 2. ff �. N a �p ii =n ° >_� mo an $33� $3m$. -Y -'Y°; Nd 3�$gd j N 4 20W .aJ. O_•oL+'. S`VW o _ �� g..G�'''.c m g mm.$ av] n of J or 3 °gam° S RmPm m,g ° S �.`�.umi°1� v $ a RWog H °n'<a'$5 M $ S a - '' E_ m y v gm Q3 QQx N gel d $, m 2 n ? U b N °v v a T P ,• Jm' .� _.� J $_.�o. c p a22 o'c p g 3 q v e g J_ n 2 o a o ° 7. 9 5 1 v NE c A t0 to d 7 d 3 N m m N P d w D ?o 4 � a yo =0-' S v c ' v $ R Dg� 2;� Em oa �P d v od.F 8$ao $� �o ym yg''� �o �n o3� �0 �3 �t cw_ ewe II p °6no 3i.DO°J�' � wm8yo�'n o H_.S -��o1 m m�om a Na 3 So$� y >;�a`S $ y� $ °, �ptiv° �y� c �n� y r '_i v w5y� m 5- t m �i ryry n5p ppDd tNo ] F.y :3$ d m' p mJ o c. �T n m sg� m y c Qo Op ; Oi w a- SO. 0 ' N i m j m D P° S v? O. T°j m Si 2 m f� = N n S m S w m^ [$ P O fO w J 3 w w m I Z r O J F J a 3 _? ] "I E z avo o g F ^'F ° x ^�N � cS � 3 �o �$ ? a'o °.RL Jn E,c c m'F _ d xw o"3�v O d oai o -osi � A m3- ?c� 39aJ+ Jmw3 d _w m3 _ A yvo g .59 r.n_. dRo' dJ a 9 `� A mJ_mo'_nmm $m a m R w�.. }. �wo°i =' X0'34- -g� o�wy 4.��mc m vv �.��$g rcI .$ m'a' oJ_ �$ m�' dm$ A cYm$ `°HOO = ° .N_yJ S 3 m w amD w� ;"a dg3wP �° Smf a _i Fo..%� 3 x.5 Y, rG g _m mm5 w w �S`� C1 fmf 3 Co a� �� 9° "°H a8�S's �3.�� �3� °a �` g0v3� m.Q^ HYP3: S� °p y gR�� H QQ S n �$o < gi `g 833�O° o' nd Hn =$ gm ro_ SAS •..d m a3i n.. c aDv dk m Jd �a� m `�a o$ �`a�$ 3cN md. `° dN $om�$ 3� °. ym$ wv. aJ =', -� w J O 3 O m$ (D R N 2 d �vo3. $SoJ a ¢o£$ °g3 mo a o m �R H •-I� m d ^S]�' O $ a < C._(gdn CO �� ^ V Q� yam 0� ryJq d C a <S C mS N C INC J ° y. J_ J� ]5 m a >' a„ ' N m NG pf Qn 1 p v m �'vi eo' nSyJ/ >4� y{pF p3D wo�Z a gn °Am'a Hc°a' $Q� yOS gj =, r/m'� 3�°° $7Qdm `°`^ 3 $?wm (w�$ 0Y1 y3 ? O RN 7 SZ J 2 j 3' F trtrpp JP. O Cd m °1R �. 3FOddP ] ] mJ mP�O b d 0 C O 3 m $ n $ m$ n >; S F •c` w v 3 R $ 3 oln a w _ a < u d c P m d am R- y d.g mm`c n19 rvQ?v H x'n =2'�T mmo <a `off' J•� ° $ a da yn5g3 _ o F_3 'R, v m a. J m$ $ ] a d 3 m R m H m a m _ m _ < co m m a a m x P ° H n a_ �_. .. a _ $ erg^ d� P s$ S `$$�ORG c J 3a= $dv oa w E�2 WW- 951 �^ m o N a a Y mS m �+ ^ m' n c$ S'< i m $ aJ o J° `° �i c ]v E 8 P °_'. �' y �° o m. m 3. m F CE 6 3 9L D a m w o^ vy F ?$ m $ to S m 3 o c n R v $ m �n 3 y w v a m v 3 m 3c�� g3c P m�v n qq wF P= n S y m G1 O d J J m S J d m$ `7 o g n $$a -� mm n o $ $o J $ iy� S$.$� y� °!cll 3. 3H m_ < =m m. dm 3.c'g oXoa`��aa3 H� $E ` ?n -� n 5m_ w 2 Qyy3 c m m ry ° Q D a r ii Asa „ • • • �o oa aura- O z 0 00 -1i T i D �Dp9N y O SA.n cr a O r fT1 O D N N RApi 0n Z Al "D DOr L OD •`I; y T a m a m F S 3D;K 7 N gSYJ'R ti w w a D T 2D mom; DN Om TmZm pi 2y o ggn $ a es o 5 =33,m m 5' °mom' o, � R.�o m. °`W�a_ y� _O -1 'O SE � v M y n0' TO >y Zto H!� DD0 mO D 3 J Q n r 3vmo'^ y .�''$o� �'a^d o'$01 ma r7am D cmv S a s "0' �N O AZn O �T R @ 3 �a m .<gg J� <3'm ww ° e m .m 2 'M* S 2A iAA A� mi 2!>D3 Am ai T `' 8 S S SSvc z g 3 -Sm <n; in �� ?°D�a �°a - a z yi �o� ifc s> iym= coo m� m d °� a��mv8 Q$° n N _i Ala' a2 N Z Aft nyf) _m N H C D O J .�' m Z m� m >•nm d T50 m < Z nr HS Z �p 'r2=O S V y v s m o_ 3.m3a� n ^Y>Q m- N O O i; 2 D P- 'k. G=1 A r p'� N f) f m^. S' w 5' m Q m n a d S 5-:5 . oci Y aa F A O? i�r �f iy rDD r _Tr m g w a o `.mmn v dg$ !$S $3 oT '<01O z CA Q T D ii i m <r 3 D Anj p D y e 3 S d °a $� �o g y � 8d 3 aD m Q 3' Q- (D 7 �p 2y 2i N b A r AO < n T w of d.J 95 Z -2. c n '<� n 3 c yZ-' rm G1r AAX m 09 v 2 m° a�v -n m ov 4. m gg o 3�r Sy m y A �a o a� oo a °� i y0 $ R o;s�nd "a.�� $�'a 8 oo :w, 8 a O C rS Omi "* W yCf A A O e�i c 3 E� °v m '�$m m v.im 3a �`' 3a m N _ i Z i T N 2 m '. w $ < J F. g e a w R m] S m °�' H ZT i ;0 m� D OC70 i i0 q .� y^ g m Fa >>n3$ S m a 3a 3 z s A' i T W i n f) O y r� TyS 5T rm .0-'-0 T Si O 8_-i io a!omR S N n. }pRt°� 02'd y`ggo O mm J m? O T r f N i f1 p Z m i f m A i r O 2 �i S 3 6�r m >• C° m �' ° 3. " o A c i zm mm> �y =i �1Tiz° c0ip o H yg"oz299 � A D r D�, O'r m0 m r S; S. m'.< $y $f° pnj m 2 faf< S� A m�.rm ZyN T CD 1e W o o n $Pm C H T < o i S Z SE a CD n0 f)= a� r O.tiA im 4 � F'M1 �^ ° pr% $ Jq� g �, 3 °- A -9io =mm ni z= zn� X �� m �v ?(a'' o 0 a; nn 22 iy 0z 'C' m mD 0 m z sib im _ M n= 2-.1 D� i0< y m mm Om p y 0 ib m ZA w O S Q �] 633: Fd �' n m R W °' ear D 0 yTn i A Z T T A y m c ,z y J $ O J o n y ypb �p y0 0 -1 3 wn Qm5 m� Q T T Z G f1 (3. i N T A y rr- A x C 0 N z i o F a Monet g Buildi i B �Sl�g� g8 myP F� 0 B n YS;ayy, t�u=m- 3 c pb�e:3 s�"d AO 3as� Beach Palm Gardens, xY_ _p8�3_ � ns, s s° ���, a� d m� Specifications ecifi u � 0 0 0 illy VA 9� limilmlimliml Ell I 1 III 1 1 a c n 0 0 0 �N m e �II� _�= '((�IIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIINi�1 s � 6 A 0 N D m $ oL n p z n �d �n ° `rp00 D 2'i Z; mfg >00(zr� Q PLC; 8OM ED m Z 0 N ° �5 ! =n V1 O m � t N w O NC A Z z -q C) C) Zmarm N ^ M °rw m .-p-0 i A �=0 v � A O A mNO O 0 Zy.' 0 > O ZN °ZFDD � O rrn ov in°m avi - - - yy�1�'a ifs• x�: �m J m m O� KO Alm U Op <Z Vi QC m O �O z A p m m umi z VI A m z 0 z z z o� m C+ Nm ►Z N y -I - �I I pV b _ N o r 0 t. Z 0 y mm o c m A v � A O CO O 0 Zy.' 0 > O ZN °ZFDD � - rr208 m _ Al �_- c ±� tiAA =m S I N w� m N �- � 2 j� �1 JD A A O Oyy A o II z� �A °° ^��n° �i no ;C O O �� i z ti p �m '%- > . �� soYn oo Zo �Z o 0 �6 0 x mo °m° I z z o� m C+ Nm ►Z N y -I - �I I pV b _ N o r 0 t. Z 0 y mm o c m A v � A O CO O 0 Zy.' 0 > O ZN °ZFDD � n � m m _ �_- c ±� tiAA =m S I N w� I �- FA n- 0 ii nm O can E� ➢D 20 ��` A A O O A A O Oyy A o x N A �A °° ^��n° �i no ;C O O 0 0 0 z ti p NC, z� soYn oo Zo �Z o 0 0 0 0 x mo °m° A m z °° a o on z z ; o z Du p o 2 O F m O o z ti ° Zo . n1 f y Cam A 2 m s D 2 O z C z C .4; 0 7z xx� A ° F z x Zr, 9 O Z xy a p° p= m" 5 o Y C» m PE wE S r r ° 1 1 p L 2 N G E� � v z o� m C+ Nm ►Z N y -I - �I I pV b _ N o r 0 t. Z 0 y mm o c m A O CO O 0 Zy.' 0 > O A S n � m m _ z o� m C+ Nm ►Z N y -I - �I I pV b _ N o r 0 t. Z 0 y mm o c m I ild�sro^ \ fp D N 2 Z nn1111 q, ffff� S PROPERTY FA -di7 = CO Zy.' AZ �m x0O �_- c oZ OZ S I N w� I U ry VI 1X/ ❑� III I O p N I ild�sro^ \ fp D N 2 Z nn1111 q, ffff� S PROPERTY FA -di7 = s R 7-m m� m nz 00 � N a N U N UO O IN fz n a n mx v z n rn v f a N Iz IN m G A A �1 ti U0 r N N n m m i O P�P an Z � F D I v 1 Z � � n V I i yV A O ° � m A D D y g D 0n 0 10 0 co ul yy z O A n pi of A m _ raN 0 O N A ;u m K B °z j Ro A m I_A if 1,-1 y�j A A D m m Z1 U U ti rs1� ' nZ +IC m Z UM 3 U C .ZI v 6 ~_ om A =m nm m U ti rrj (7 A A m m "o _O O C7 (n O - ab >npp0 DZ'�Z� � AM> mZ 0 m U N C_ ;O Oz r >n mN 'D ZNDZ mE <cZi > Z� nS $ ivy mom aq1� W � Z O 1W mw v r -� l-.t, CINIRA, IL v D 1e MILI1APr ifeA1L r 0 ALT MA J 1 + + O cn fV -n 0 O , .''. moat O O�' It Q A It CENTRAL BLVD 0 ;I 0 0 � Q / Wa reens PUD o � � � o � d t .b `; 0° Led ends at the Gardens T ~ V �4� Palm Beach Gardens Florida J • O ^' V SIP J 1 + + O cn fV -n 0 O , .''. moat O O�' It Q A It CENTRAL BLVD 0 ;I 0 0 � Q / Wa reens PUD o � � � o � d t .b `; 0° Led ends at the Gardens T ~ V �4� Palm Beach Gardens Florida J • ling 1*6*1! Hwk MIKE, am?, Nil II ee II � Ilwl mat am?, Nil II ee II � Ilwl 4 k g -- -- -- - -- ------ - - -- :MARCWIENER�A.I;A.;-- F WALGREEN S lJ 9V(ClifiE�il9,r 1.CAt�JINCz:-- c LEGENDS @ .......... .AK8001686: o� PALM BEACH GARDENS -------------- ? -�6 ""5"`E" ,�'° N 4 docA tutora:aoluoA i �-rJO -rht �FK+W- al� 3 II o . if ON &IN B BI FIN. ,kae • • I I — — — BI r r s i�_ — —_ __ s ` WIM I ON El s 110 I .r nil do t s I Ion In • 1 115 up of U: �/C I I U U U if I II i ii..... E EE , ,„ p• i ' ( (I s i Ell ; of H HUR a a U. �t _ Od _ e eE'seeeeM'� 0E.E u to 4r E E.. i it � �ilt�ali ( If t� = =f I no IF II I of no I I Ea low L —� I I — U Ur. In !� I � UV � �> E , �� rl P` L I _ _ �i8 I I ` `II • U. no I . .EEC lam •r�;{ � ME �� _ • I� l w I C I sE:." II h°,` a- ------ - - -- :MARCWIENER�A.I;A.;-- F WALGREEN S lJ 9V(ClifiE�il9,r 1.CAt�JINCz:-- c LEGENDS @ .......... .AK8001686: o� PALM BEACH GARDENS -------------- ? -�6 ""5"`E" ,�'° N 4 docA tutora:aoluoA i �-rJO -rht �FK+W- al� 3 0 0 0 03110 t_'I. I 1 - 07.0M1 20 I'l 117.UM1.IM I N y <oz I � 1 [1 r 1C N I fD, � � �i. IP b W t� ' D C r ��I g .t1 0 vT_ F rti 01 a� mrm A 4 r ^ 1 1 1 a 1 1 I 1 F am m c» N 4 I 't/ O r � I I m I N y <oz o I I fD, � � �i. IP b W t� ' D C r ��I g rti 4 A 4 xl- m r -�, m m.� PL : _6.06 � E | � ! � � � � � � � � j2k £ ; !> Mi »% �`\ 2, °��� | (7() � > \ / ()(((§( {�/§} E §( |( | ) k \ §7! m $§ ] \ 7 ;I 9VA A| !( ■ !§ ! |7$ -- - - k ■ ; $ �§ ■ � 2 � | ) ; 1 -- -- -- --- - - }= = -- — - — - — - — - — - — -- - -- -- - - -- - - -- --- - - - - -- -- - — - — - -- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- — "' o ;❑{ C rZn � y� 2 2 y�~ G ~ zzvgo- > m s �� R° ay° f om> vt 3 o I - mmm OO> Z mG z on LA s Jim Arn »igC¢ ¢ R �9 op r9 - -m N_uPP D T�yM LFifl Y�j�Ypl{iq i n`� N OJGm NP P pypS 1�ip �,,�,� f�2� .h$ � ,p [ R if =ymlq Ca 74 I 0NO�mmNO� 190 ; nR �RF �^ �� €nm Q � °� �ox , IPA 0000- ora -�. cZii;€ all F � ;i R RI i Smi ob>uinii..om � b GN— PJmmNN i 6 A4 14 ad i,4 ''s�6s {gyre- I a: AF ERR" �; n mE CA O u y i o{ is GE i b� M (UA "' o ;❑{ C rZn � y� 2 2 y�~ G ~ zzvgo- > m s �� R° ay° f om> vt 3 o I - mmm OO> Z mG z on LA s Jim Arn »igC¢ ¢ R �9 op r9 - -m N_uPP D T�yM LFifl Y�j�Ypl{iq i n`� N OJGm NP P pypS 1�ip �,,�,� f�2� .h$ � ,p [ R if =ymlq Ca 74 I 0NO�mmNO� 190 ; nR �RF �^ �� €nm Q � °� �ox , IPA 0000- ora -�. cZii;€ all F � ;i R RI i Smi ob>uinii..om � b GN— PJmmNN i 6 A4 14 ad i,4 ''s�6s {gyre- I a: AF ERR" �; n mE R.6yF E m�O Fps` Tm 11 MH y i o{ is GE i b� M ar 41 a s $ s Y 7 �a "a'6€ a u-5€ €oE;0 = ag�a F eel o€ . 6 � m g. dYBm P! AA o � w � N M ti 2 M N U O o D z 2 2 D P N U z z m m 0 (D D ' Z� O (n ° o � O n 11, ME 1!.,.d "h"OJA L C) � C LEGENDS ® Jeff H. Iravani Inc. SITE PLAN ' A�' ConsuFdng En�neers �T` ,o a>E f>m 01GYN '34 COMMERCE LANE, SUITE 5 (561) 575-6030 THE GARDENS 1934 COMMERCE LANE, SUITE 5 (561) 575 -6030 JUPITER, FLORIDA 33458 FAX 575 -6088 f!flfff 06 -10 -2003 1' =J0' JHI ZAK PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA Jfl"d th.net 1llii ilf still 0 1 . 0 .­ 0 Af 6' I I x I I I ° I P m o_ X I z I L—�ar D I I z ° a gD r D � T. q D D 00 Cu j o$ cil � N - - - - -- g D --- cl _ I " 0� M Y D � Z M O m a��A 0 qtr C r T. m (mj Z m W mz mz z r° D "- - - - - -- m `" °. g o �g a O z ° a gD r D � T. q D I b D j o$ cil - N N A EP g I b D j - �m M Phi's � g D 1 0 c !D 0� M Y D � I b ti c j - �m c-0 c 0 M M 7 xa X — -- -- A R 4 m (mj m m W mz mz A m m g o � O z 3 C m V1 m ' o 3 R S m •z A m 8 R g 0 m Q m o 91 M m u m��maO�O�m am�n�Y'�i - o I S g S Z ? o 3. a $ o n n L r If + N U1 x ao 01 D z 6) in D r r in ± All Am I I I I I I I I I o 1 1 I I M ti c j - 0 M M 7 xa X — -- -- xe n A $ o z V1 E�E @ 7W Ia I: r gT K33 33 Ir If I pp ) ; a ■T] -nnQa `nn n� Nv �N rn vC1..r -+im m,pix +J C o r" o b b _ x� "$ ' POW ME9 RN T u' �gcm GGo <= LA 5 3 3s5 � i ;zzo ig O Lsv E ° nr g g z a b+ .0 -po,N u 0 0* b z r- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I� I� I I I I I I I L- .211 a h !3,l a:, 9 LEGENDS IM Jeff R Iravani, Inc. is§ g$g' DETAILS g�414� ` AT Conautdng Er�neersx WE OE"N er er THE GARDENS 1934 COMMERCE LANE, SUITE 5 (561) 575 -6030 ����$���] JUPITER, FLORIDA 33458 FAX 575 -6088 06 -10 -2003 1' -30' JHI ZAK PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA J#Mdsouth.nel ------ ----- -- - it = 7,W =71 = =7 0 O PIP N Q�rr PI �4 gaaoz Fcfisl >xgx"- '�'�Engo°o55zzzzp o -z u 2�OO� ,J'vxcAtmimtmi�'^�� �pi`a� C 8r AAZr7C �n ^' mZ $c: c: m z ippn$ mo'ac< <'^F<<a m xmpmrmmrm y0��mm9 mmNN�r9m ZmA2 rr�yp y O GGm�<C�Ny ? O r R 1 m D y> 'It" '% 'w t r'� I I I I ► I Ir 0 LLn 'It" '% 'w t r'� I I I I ► I F CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEGENDS ® Jeff H. Iravani, Inc. ar�44 AT consufti1g Wneers u � ilm I WE sc...c oevcr+m � orurN � '1`1 lI. ��ARDRNS 1934 COMMERCE LANE, SUITE 5 (561) 575 -6030 ����,��� 9 JUPITER, FLORIDA 33458 FAX 575 -6088 BV`�yA�7 06 -10 -2003 1' =.70' JHI Z�vc PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA Hftde th..et Ir F CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN LEGENDS ® Jeff H. Iravani, Inc. ar�44 AT consufti1g Wneers u � ilm I WE sc...c oevcr+m � orurN � '1`1 lI. ��ARDRNS 1934 COMMERCE LANE, SUITE 5 (561) 575 -6030 ����,��� 9 JUPITER, FLORIDA 33458 FAX 575 -6088 BV`�yA�7 06 -10 -2003 1' =.70' JHI Z�vc PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA Hftde th..et I II =. e m . �o$o I a a a T n V iu 0 ° mmmm e UOUNO 0000 DIA r °.0 0 a 3r m ;f^c s y 0 3 JNOI Um� gQ0 O 0 b D N m C-) _Q O Z N 0 0 F 2 N L A N z m A m 0 Nn Z u ; a® n Z A � � L D 11 TRUCK ROUTING LEGEND S ® Jeff H. Iravani Inc. g� PLAN AT Consulting EVneeem 92s 11A WE scut W"M e, 1 WAr BY THE GARDENS 1934 COMMERCE LANE, SUITE 5 (561) 575 -6030 aji N JUPITER, FLORIDA 33458 FAX 575 -6088 06 -10 -2003 1'=70' JHI ZNC PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA JMlmel°outhmet p'� 7 � 0 u -� L - ' NINE I I limp � I I II =. e m . �o$o I a a a T n V iu 0 ° mmmm e UOUNO 0000 DIA r °.0 0 a 3r m ;f^c s y 0 3 JNOI Um� gQ0 O 0 b D N m C-) _Q O Z N 0 0 F 2 N L A N z m A m 0 Nn Z u ; a® n Z A � � L D 11 TRUCK ROUTING LEGEND S ® Jeff H. Iravani Inc. g� PLAN AT Consulting EVneeem 92s 11A WE scut W"M e, 1 WAr BY THE GARDENS 1934 COMMERCE LANE, SUITE 5 (561) 575 -6030 aji N JUPITER, FLORIDA 33458 FAX 575 -6088 06 -10 -2003 1'=70' JHI ZNC PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA JMlmel°outhmet p'� � 0 u -� L I II =. e m . �o$o I a a a T n V iu 0 ° mmmm e UOUNO 0000 DIA r °.0 0 a 3r m ;f^c s y 0 3 JNOI Um� gQ0 O 0 b D N m C-) _Q O Z N 0 0 F 2 N L A N z m A m 0 Nn Z u ; a® n Z A � � L D 11 TRUCK ROUTING LEGEND S ® Jeff H. Iravani Inc. g� PLAN AT Consulting EVneeem 92s 11A WE scut W"M e, 1 WAr BY THE GARDENS 1934 COMMERCE LANE, SUITE 5 (561) 575 -6030 aji N JUPITER, FLORIDA 33458 FAX 575 -6088 06 -10 -2003 1'=70' JHI ZNC PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA JMlmel°outhmet p'� Gwtib1t4p e� ae- eBC6 &� � I > ;y '• Cfi � � I Op �ry���'- °• a DEB l ory,� Maas:. ee� . ►,� a €� e� I , � e� � Fa �% E io Op @B e� , -M�WIMIM W-11 j.w ` el� c� a a►► ea t ";' - C. r. E a EL7 Cis C<~ CD CB FG �G ✓ r / 6D P y .✓ .,,,. �' �� � Nom• i F � �` - �N Q wa .. � <rL L 'i,',_ °<:.: - ,zJ //. 4 %;G�od�: r /iLn //.12 �•,��i i� °i,:� r� >ar son a� III,. b PA I�f� 19 F 9 log €_ as cx 88 °¢ 8E�F A Rig gF � s � S$ � �I • bb€ x jE yo" Q R m 4 e° Q� �Y & R• 1n 3 Go '� "g9y- y o _ JR jAA :2 a� g 1� N a a 4 Q Wa/ reens PUD T o }�a,Y Legends at the Gardens v boP Row b b Palm Beach Gardens Florida y P .l. J Y,, r UL "r y l i • t ti � � �� � � ���: +' v Il,�i lil � I.�'� �� �j.I' i' /// ,.u^t � �� � � ,• - ��. �i. � �� .. . -,�,., �+ _ _ _ i _ �.� / �' _ ` __. ��� L�`' � ✓� � �..n. 4 . ,. � � � � � t t Y � w. �•,. m��K � . �,� r INV 1 wt "tow i low, "I ziag I Aw At 17 P... 0 1111111111111WAW 0 01 WAAW1 P [A 0, SUMMARY OF DATA Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. has undertaken a parking demand study at various retail drug stores in northern Palm Beach County. The intent of the study is to establish a parking demand rate which can be applied to the proposed Walgreens with 14,729 square feet of pharmacy /drug store and 13,200 square feet of office space. Nine pharmacies /drug stores with drive -thru windows were studied on a typical Wednesday and Friday from 11 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. at half -hour intervals to observe the parking demand characteristics. The results from the study are summarized below: Peak Parking Demand observed a 2.87 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet (Wednesday, October 25, 2006) • 2.69 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet (Friday, October 20, 2006) The results from the parking demand study support a parking occupancy of less than 3.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet of building. Furthermore, the Institute of Transportation Engineers' Parking Generation report, 3rd Edition • suggests a rate of 2.02 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet for a weekday. Therefore, the rate of 4.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet of pharmacy /drug store will provide more than adequate parking supply for the proposed Walgreens pharmacy /drug store at the south- west corner of Central Boulevard and Donald Ross Road in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. Notice that the site data on the facing page confirm that parking for the Walgreens meets the rate of 4.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet. The conclusion set forth above does not take into consideration the benefits of sharing of parking spaces between the office and the drug store. It should also be noted that additional customers can be served from the two drive -thru windows that can queue up to a maximum of 14 cars. Palm Beach Gardens Code Requirement: General Retail 4.0 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA Pharmacy /Drugstore 5.0 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA Data Collection & Literature Recommendation: Pharmacy /Drugstore 3.0 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA • 0 • �i parking Study /� K I:igorr 2 z •oo Cr „did.,tc Site Luc.,tiun+ � oso Fx� Candidate Sites Store Location Size (SF) Drive -Thru C2 Military Trail & Indiantown Road 12,500 Yes C3 Military Trail & Frederick Small Road 12,500 Yes C4 Military Trail & Donald Ross Road 9,200 Yes C5 North Lake Boulevard & Congress Avenue 14,000 Yes C6 North Lake Boulevard & US I 11,000 Yes W2 Indiantown Road & Maplewood Drive 20,700 Yes W3 Military Trail & Indiantown Road 18,000 Yes W4 North Lake Boulevard & Congress Avenue 18,500 Yes W5 North Lake Boulevard & US 1 12,000 Yes 4 9 O C Y R a 1 0 Summary of Observed Peak Parking Demand 1. Peak season conversion factor of 1.21 was used to factor the rate to peak season count. 2 Peak season conversion factor of 1.19 was used to factor the rate to peak season count. Peak Parking Demand Rate 2.87 2.68 • 2.33 2.09 2.18 3 \ 1.93 2.32 - -- --- - - - - -- I S3 1.83 1.74 1.58 1.11 1.62 7.45 CVS (C2) CVS (C3) CVS (C4) CVS (C5) CVS (C6) Walgreens (W2) Walgreens (W3) Walgreens (W4) Walgreens Candidate Sites �- Demand (Oct 20, 2006) -6- Demand (Oct 25, 2006) I Square Available Peak Parking Peak Season Max. Peak I Peak Season Parking Demand Feet Parking Demand Parking Demand Rate (per 1,000 S.F.) 20- Oct -06 25- Oct -06 10/20/20061110/25/200621 20- Oct -06 I 25 -Oct -06 CVS (C2) 12,500 51 23 22 28 26 2.23 2.09 575 W. Indiantown Rd CVS (0) 12,500 49 18 22 22 26 1.74 2.09 4100 Military Trail CVS (C4) 9,200 87 12 18 15 21 1.58 2.33 4500 Donald Ross Road CVS (C5) 14,000 91 11 13 13 15 0.95 1.11 3168 Northlake Blvd. CVS (C6) 11,000 61 18 15 22 18 1.98 1.62 312 N. Lake Blvd. Walgreens (W2) 20,700 90 46 50 56 60 2.69 2.87 1800 W. Indiantown Rd. Walgreens (W3) 18,000 75 28 33 34 39 1.88 2.18 439 W. Indiantown Rd. Walgreens (W4) 18,500 70 28 30 34 36 1.83 1:93 3063 Northlake Blvd. Walgreens (W5) 12,000 49 23 27 28 32 2.32 2.68 230 US Highway 1 Maximum ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.69 2.87 --------------- -------- - - - - -- 85th Percentile - ---- ------ -- - - -- 2.29 --------------- -- - -- 2.44 1. Peak season conversion factor of 1.21 was used to factor the rate to peak season count. 2 Peak season conversion factor of 1.19 was used to factor the rate to peak season count. Peak Parking Demand Rate 2.87 2.68 • 2.33 2.09 2.18 3 \ 1.93 2.32 - -- --- - - - - -- I S3 1.83 1.74 1.58 1.11 1.62 7.45 CVS (C2) CVS (C3) CVS (C4) CVS (C5) CVS (C6) Walgreens (W2) Walgreens (W3) Walgreens (W4) Walgreens Candidate Sites �- Demand (Oct 20, 2006) -6- Demand (Oct 25, 2006) I PARKING DEMA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Prepared by Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is an executive summary of the detailed Parking Demand Study submitted to the City of Palm Beach Gardens for the proposed Walgreens. Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc. performed a parking demand study of various retail drug stores to establish a parking demand rate for the proposed Walgreens at the southwest corner of Central Boulevard and Donald Ross Road in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. Nine pharmacies /drug stores in the area with drive -thru windows were studied on a typical Wednesday and Friday from 11 a.m. to 8:30 p.m. at half -hour intervals to observe the parking demand. The maximum parking demand observed during the peak period for all the nine sites was 2.87 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of building. Therefore, the rate of 4.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet of pharmacy /drug store will provide more than adequate parking supply for the proposed Walgreens drug store. KIMLEY HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Frederick W. Schwartz, P.E. Senior Vice President CJ V• SITE DATA - Walgreens at Central Boulevard and Donald Ross Road Total Parking Spaces = 103 spaces provided 13,200sf Office @1 space /300 sf = 44 spaces for office Remaining Available for Drugstore = 59 spaces for drugstore 14,729sf Drugstore = 4.0 spaces per1,000sf of drugstore Donald Ross Road 1 1 - - .r -- - ----------------- - - - , --------------------- I a j 1 _ '•� - I� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M i, PRESERVE AREA 1.38 Ac _�;__, - -___ - - ,?►- T_ Of 222u C I I p I 1 ZQJ it¢P.icd� , , = '_E b BOLD nRC�w, M9 r tx 4 t- O rmvm M oo ° DZD ? >p K— t2d � _ 0mo N r�0 =N L40 1 LL49M r0 om- os Lo �- y d ° t2d t2d t4 cn y 10 y M C - �y tmMM4 � >a F-rn Z0 N o '7 (=I � t4 q) tmMM4 r-C d �s R° c, Q z No REVISION B D.te GARDENS PLAZA �., Keshavarz & Associates, Inc. COVER SHEET `�,, CONSULTING ENGMEMS - SURVEYORS (PUD) 711 North Dixie Highway, Suite 701 1. DATE 06 /25/07 DESIGNED RS CHECKED ACa West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida SCALE NA/A DAD SH APPROVED MK ;;' Td: (561) 669 MM Fm (561) 689.7476 is rsm W N 0 z�� o d c� Fik; Kk2ON\06-M&Wpl PhM 9\dvq\060M-004-GPDdwq amoinos v9d CONCEPTUAL L REVISION By Date GMMS PLAZA GRADING, PAVMG ARMPNOWD "M "R Keshavarz &Associates, Inc. -SURWYOM (PUD) DRAINAGE PUN CONSULTING ENGRAMRS z 711 North Dixie Highway, Suite 201 DATE Oro/Z5/07 1 DESIGNED RS- CHECKED Ac� West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 ]Palm Beach Gardens, Florida CAD ZYH APPROVED "K Tel: (561) 689-86M Fm: (561) 6W7476 LB 4W ",< F1 r. \shoe \u`Sl�rLW Ph. y� M v Y - LYYY© u ix ;7 -r` - RX � x P e eel a WI M O env #°� R j =i €x • a i Fir U a E °° i Ga�AH S�sys 'g R !o ;I ° 0o N i v e nINA 91f.90 .�r �44� w C•e> rgop: a °go. �:• ;:nr Roer Nqp� • °n" f•1 ^pos•'«G ��a01°r# pep e'rav Age3 Yw2 tSS N eoia ieSp; wi pr 01 V ai Y Fe• f•• e i' 3� �`i :, j' it : P;� ;sus es Yi::�€ Fit asp ;.o ;��'s1 te ia: £¢ ° �° N ASS ��sZ`� �!� • • 24 88 g v is IL gFPy tggM S_SO Rss_ N��s� e a R 9 p i �j 90 $�q q� gi RI y� t� p s ��g k3 ° a�a 4 To Be Po/d For Under The CaMroot Unit P/!oe For /Nets, Moftlos Or Arctlon Boxes, F-A. ro se a ( Rl"r Rl" shInlet )T* T S R rsnoe T J� m� ` o P. e Sf' 3gra �a��o m e�0 Referent Bottom Ski) Depth„ F P f r r r t' -T i i i 1p F i go 0 e1 Jill 6i all 1181 gig ;11 w= � o ff' "` S R gig hh ft -4 b. jj�j g „ < K< 1 11 0 0 a� ?g i o f SS61EIp o Mg 7K 4 9 Ig ',011 i18 is Rq 91 '! H im 2. lit m I a R 166 1 MI �� €i' Rif �� € m gal is AI It K s s ,.„ , 7 ,o v FIRN 6 Fl t i Asp o 1 �I p� �T $ PPP q IIINNN IF 2 q ox E 91 K 113. d fir w 0 <X P4 0 M s a - Keshavarz & Associates, Inc. � ° GARDENS PLAZA GRADING, PAVING AND ( - _ - � _ -- � `' °. I (P�) DRAINAGE DETAILS j `�S`F %� coxsu� �xans - SURVEYORS 7 1 Norm n;xie Hi way, Suite 201 ° ? a�Te o6i25io� ues�crreu Rs ceec�o AG bleat Palm Bearh, ands 33401 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida sca,B ti.T s. — SH � APPROVED MK m j ! °•.� Te �s�gse9e600 r>z cs�i)�� +� r �av� eirr 111 WOMB L YrY^ L hhl�nn Y - LYYY© u ix ;7 -r` - RX � x P e eel a WI M O env #°� R j =i €x • a i Fir U a E °° i Ga�AH S�sys 'g R !o ;I ° 0o N i v e nINA 91f.90 .�r �44� w C•e> rgop: a °go. �:• ;:nr Roer Nqp� • °n" f•1 ^pos•'«G ��a01°r# pep e'rav Age3 Yw2 tSS N eoia ieSp; wi pr 01 V ai Y Fe• f•• e i' 3� �`i :, j' it : P;� ;sus es Yi::�€ Fit asp ;.o ;��'s1 te ia: £¢ ° �° N ASS ��sZ`� �!� • • 24 88 g v is IL gFPy tggM S_SO Rss_ N��s� e a R 9 p i �j 90 $�q q� gi RI y� t� p s ��g k3 ° a�a 4 To Be Po/d For Under The CaMroot Unit P/!oe For /Nets, Moftlos Or Arctlon Boxes, F-A. ro se a ( Rl"r Rl" shInlet )T* T S R rsnoe T J� m� ` o P. e Sf' 3gra �a��o m e�0 Referent Bottom Ski) Depth„ F P f r r r t' -T i i i 1p F i go 0 e1 Jill 6i all 1181 gig ;11 w= � o ff' "` S R gig hh ft -4 b. jj�j g „ < K< 1 11 0 0 a� ?g i o f SS61EIp o Mg 7K 4 9 Ig ',011 i18 is Rq 91 '! H im 2. lit m I a R 166 1 MI �� €i' Rif �� € m gal is AI It K s s ,.„ , 7 ,o v FIRN 6 Fl t i Asp o 1 �I p� �T $ PPP q IIINNN IF 2 q ox E 91 K 113. d fir w 0 <X P4 0 M s a - Keshavarz & Associates, Inc. � ° GARDENS PLAZA GRADING, PAVING AND ( - _ - � _ -- � `' °. I (P�) DRAINAGE DETAILS j `�S`F %� coxsu� �xans - SURVEYORS 7 1 Norm n;xie Hi way, Suite 201 ° ? a�Te o6i25io� ues�crreu Rs ceec�o AG bleat Palm Bearh, ands 33401 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida sca,B ti.T s. — SH � APPROVED MK m j ! °•.� Te �s�gse9e600 r>z cs�i)�� +� r �av� y \Wd4d WW. Ph— fl ad, \0605e_Ci I- rs_CP0_DnS. o.q T ?tTOno> a � L I J o 0 Ll 53 3a m 4. m m o 0 3` o ° Sri it m 0 2 m H n � !T n N I T UN., .w y a c Q N N I f Li N Obbb- p 000co- 0 �� O 0 0 - N N _ v N $ 0 0 0 O pmmp i' 1F� T $e 3 _I R �o i �$ L o ti jg N L � � Z�t � O Na REVISION By D.t $ GARDENS PLAZA GRADING, PAVING AND 6 �" E' Keshavarz & Associates, Inc. ., CONSULTING ENGINEERS - SURVEYORS (P�) DRAINAGE DSTAIIS ` z �e 711 West Palm Beach, Florida 3340201 DATE 0(0/25/07 DESIGNED RS CHECKED Palm Beach Gardens, Florida SCALE ti.T.S. CAD 5H APPROVED MK % S" Tel: (561)689"8600 Fu: (561)09 -7a76 LB 4M mmommo PA.,, q \O.q \M59_CII- I?_G✓'D_DTLS,C.q $ 1 3 7 30' lop. fill �� Co l w o 0 0 p �1 3-3/4• �' �@ Onm D ff jQ� M N N N I g~ _T _ m ° 2-3/C i l D O f lr �•�A, N I3— /-4-I• PIC gv i i� > r. rac 4 D o k Rig g� �0 0� ii mm �$OQ k O� MI 6 3Di � t w roc a w 511 Hip p, . N — — —� o — — -- 0 41 1� No REVISION By Date $� GARDENS PLAZA GRADING PAVING AND ��" '�, Keshavarz & Associates, Inc. �► PUD CONSULTING FNOME tS - SURVEYORS DRAINAGE DSTAIIS 711 North Dixie Highway, suite 201 DATE oroi25ioT DeslcneD Rs CHECKED aU f;A� West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida SCAIE T.S. CAD 5H APPROVED MK ��s� Td: (561)689 -6600 Fu: (561)689.7476 LB 4897 _ N � N e e 4y � � 888111 � e e o � 4� 44 'P. 4 ..Elm min i M-M- m-- I a.. 4 Vs. Amb w4pw L A r) r O M � t7l l J 0 z x 9 r r z O C m EEO O z m H n td r d z p MII� :1 ■i 4'q ,0 _ _ C�R��NS PvENU� - - _ FNvlc ILD FAIRCHILD GARDENS AVENUE U • I ■ ■ ■ • I • ■ • V) ■ fD W --- -- - - -- O TT \V b 0 tad o cJ 1 i2 • l] t c r m D t,►jj Gardens Plaza (PUO) + i z a�� Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 0 9 0 S eP� _ A _ m co � _o a r ay m a n z r^ n V1 a 1�•,�1 d m z r d a a � v . N U � v�CCJ . $ P e +11",-�lll m� A w w � I r=D crd e r� G A N P . $ P e ry �I P FU D ` P r C� H —i 0 `D r_ 0 CD 0 w 0 o c v co o ? E c � a � m L� � y � � d a 6 9 ? A P P n O C r c� s � j Ys + cl V . �x G bo y�o �• Y n � • A U CID � 0000000 vp �4C mood ~� z O� N A -d lA 00 Fd. �I P FU D ` P r C� H —i 0 `D r_ 0 CD 0 w 0 o c v co o ? E c � a � m L� � y � � d a O C r c� bo n � U v � 0000000 vp �4C mood -4 ON CO O� N A -d lA 00 Fd. m�f _ n - m ,s p gyros to C) �> a D� n c� a I�•I m 7. T V a i x m OD A A m � 7 r m W .•� W N 0 G� 0 NOW P" P" m IN ME ii L fi i t I. " m D Mo 0 O m q c • Z rq m OD A A m � 7 r m W .•� W N 0 G� 0 NOW P" P" m IN ME ii L fi i t I. �W- > R9 M �r IT, -M > I E"I M li!5 m > ir- Z rn sloIF L • • • • • so— > vof � _ n ° ;n c — m co � ep9 m �• O rroe 0 b a r cd rri a n x a I•,••I �r T, 0 / V a + Cl 13 2 m o m D g�w Z -4 iY z m e.e• 9 0 0 00 a� D dos -= m �o iq9 � O � NA b a u a n x n a d z r D Now 25 + n �^ ■ m D yi O i a � 1� ■ Z m • • am' y n aC• �+ A —CO � m0 � T� vim• 0 r� po, .� • tll -0 > a V a x a ►-d �r z d� a 9 .�� €_= m m D - a Y '_ �m M m Z m 2 • • D W � of ? _ n wow + —co m a r oc m 11J a n z r� V1 T� �17� �C� +C3 y' • BYO D zm J a 9 J � A w e � • e s � s $ r ^, �C G' r� F� o � IFS s 9 FIR _ o .� H m l'D fi fD fD (D Q�i CD S L: n P r C � O m .� ppqq P t=J o f9 0 (D f9 0 O d S H A S H o m m N N 00 .p 10 10 10 N G o a- D ,o p _ n = m eo � omv m O fn w 'C r m 11J S '^ n v1 D �r0 m z r z V D C = + 0"o x� -� > Kf� • 3 ' � w • Z m D o eof � _ n °in c - m om� � 0 N Y u VuTj ' Y I ' w n Vl1 Y r �N a +nv o ggg$$$¢R Y > Z gl Pajl � $ C m Z rn �R t f t -f t t t 0� dip 4b 49 69 to 9C OZ. � _ n = m co � ep9 • +• O aNO � .. • tll q r p� v m a n x a �r z r O �\ 7d M a p(X� jS� O �` • Z m t • • 1?0 oo{ ? .cam — A ° ;n C �-I 1 D rTl y r. Z T� n �1 a �r z d� a �gxx + n v $ > _ €_" m m D e�= n zN z x .zm Pa Pq ■ P PV li '9 S I I I i I ,1 94 nq I 1 0 0 0 N 01.42'45" E 664.16' _� 4 { RmEa i �� yw x m TRACT '0 -I" N§ -. g {� Q` - THE OAKS, OAKS CAST, PUi } $ c " n A I C� ; °IA sy PLAT BOOK 69. PACE i6 -19 IA r 9:'- A� 4 an m �gl� PALM BEACH COUNTY, CLORIOA v� v\ Rti Z # iair€i g ON I n +( N� or N: i '� Z �X$c q� ,� nw ♦�� ���n �� n rya 4 �mu \` �N I'�V � I I N i \ mA a ...... y...... L... ......_.................,...... .y v� 1 e, ......N• rc., : .............',.— C..... x — .� n I"' 4_ N 02'00'�0� ROCK ROAD .19 9� • Nr .a AY - / i / I • -�_ I Tom- �--� }__�� - �.T \ —` T_ ---� -N 67� � I � N 0200'20 E 333.20— �- m wmmm>Q m� o 0 — - -- t nDylr D a =`m z J A 01a I�i�O10m .Om A II N X N II II I A II 11 II N II I N A lI X n n A n n ncomnnoC�O>y�E'C NEfI 9_n - -Na m'1g AZ SA >mNAS� AAS � mEO f mAC�Anti V r S A ~ n A 2 19 DOPO� f Af mA� A y t1 A FFDF D�DFDpF DD DDVADD -1Z Cc calm srsi[ E[mo rn Z {� C f A �o py.1 tm assga \ \aN \NE9 IAei 2y O p�N� oZA nO �CZ�r+ lal'n c� ' .-ion �j \.\ l i � S o'q RpK��� m =A Z m: 1 \\ Zy a I Qou GG SOUR V�OQ TA 1 it UITIWTC NKJ+T W WAY 8010 PLAT I.XE I — BOW 2 PALC�I ]6) - - -T NCD A ZZZlcZlcc ° m I I NO2'OB 10 E BO•. - -- - _ N 020610" E 333.59' (C)_ _ _ IDMID -'O r5 N 1�i1 -9 (NO732'21•C NW0 PUt BOOK rp 01a I�i�O10m .Om A II N X N II II I A II 11 II N II I N A lI X n n A n n ncomnnoC�O>y�E'C NEfI 9_n - -Na m'1g AZ SA >mNAS� AAS � mEO f mAC�Anti V r S A ~ n A 2 19 DOPO� f Af mA� A y t1 A FFDF D�DFDpF DD DDVADD -1Z Cc calm srsi[ E[mo rn Z {� C f A �o py.1 tm assga RAE °- O p�N� oZA nO �CZ�r+ lal'n c� ' Z m FIB t^L m =A Z m: iP O^ A' A'1 wvK Zi{ V�OQ F�FFFFFFFc vA" )O ,♦, lrr NCD A ZZZlcZlcc ' f D_AZ m A = O Cn �' ., z l, � o y � O(O'f IDMID -'O r5 N 1�i1 -9 rp vmDi~ 9D [L3 r A 9 OAm NA� Z1't = Z rZ'l In m N j AiO EEyy� r t'f�N SC A `P �'21n m ~o CI N m nv 01a I�i�O10m .Om A II N X N II II I A II 11 II N II I N A lI X n n A n n ncomnnoC�O>y�E'C NEfI 9_n - -Na m'1g AZ SA >mNAS� AAS � mEO f mAC�Anti JN�OlOm ys-'! F?OiAAA^r^mmm rZi �AA 95 ~Zfl x A I'1 Z2t 5+^45 I A WONmUNDm v0l tAaUN Z T -0 yA A �� xooxF n A FFDF D�DFDpF DD DDVADD -1Z Cc calm srsi[ E[mo rn Z {� � xrrxrxN �o py.1 �> Fi�i�oFr�r DDS m� D MM-Elm F�rrF° W 9 JC JC JC VNO�V V�OQ F�FFFFFFFc A ZZZlcZlcc !!Z !LZ!!Zcc ZZ '—'--T-N 363.65' 'LAI BOOK 2. PALO 136) I �A F�s��AFFFFFFFFFFF >Fr�FF° ZN n� A mmLm O z /�1 An 9 l T N O m m C Or A< .Om A II N X N II II I A II 11 II N II I N A lI X n n A n n ncomnnoC�O>y�E'C NEfI 9_n m'1g AZ SA >mNAS� AAS � mEO f mAC�Anti O1O OX�T r4N�OlOm.4i OU1 tr"n�4N- O10'N'N Ny ys-'! F?OiAAA^r^mmm rZi �AA 95 ~Zfl x A I'1 Z2t 5+^45 I A WONmUNDm 0 F= �2 DDmm Amm Dm m>m> mmO m �N Z ODO O OOD >D D DOI� FxxrrrFF rrr yA A �� xooxF n A FFDF D�DFDpF DD DDVADD -1Z Cc calm srsi[ E[mo rn Z {� (Tl ¢��x�gig��r�x�lr!_ 1 _ _ r II n M 4 I II �i II it n II + II II n °z °i ° f C r �o ! v n mo Ao 4 � mo a r= i Z G u>i D D: y Dcc V D D S fppm c C WI^ `0H Off' T rfn 2 2 mo O O LN 9D D A �C. �'? PN �m�ppZ O vii o� VI m u2bm >m N�OrO ODmTV�immm OlOm .+ C I9'1 n Ap pnp p pDOO ♦aO�pDa mD � � DN� ve o p °xxgFxrgoFFFr FrF r II//�� A �z °s D° nn °FSSSS a9 i�a ul ulm%p C Amnrn L AAZS CTi z - >Or g�p m i own nNln og�so= I- gA - [� fim ! ^Z mm� � R7 vZi 1?n o�� soo � r'C, z v�rmm^ =O2 z 7,-A m- to m A p A O n m N t 11 Am ZOO NA, O6g SO �vgm>nV; m 3 N n n n m Z A U1 ! r m N A�l x c� L) .T1 o -D n = m rn g �n D 4 .Om W.PiP �O�m.Nirn 0 z iQiliix >N�i ¢��x�gig��r�x�lr!_ m Fi�i�oFr�r F�rrF° r� L FFFFFFFFF�FFF SV VNO�V V�OQ F�FFFFFFFc VOO�A�A F- ZZZlcZlcc !!Z !LZ!!Zcc ZZ 1 _ _ r II n M 4 I II �i II it n II + II II n °z °i ° f C r �o ! v n mo Ao 4 � mo a r= i Z G u>i D D: y Dcc V D D S fppm c C WI^ `0H Off' T rfn 2 2 mo O O LN 9D D A �C. �'? PN �m�ppZ O vii o� VI m u2bm >m N�OrO ODmTV�immm OlOm .+ C I9'1 n Ap pnp p pDOO ♦aO�pDa mD � � DN� ve o p °xxgFxrgoFFFr FrF r II//�� A �z °s D° nn °FSSSS a9 i�a ul ulm%p C Amnrn L AAZS CTi z - >Or g�p m i own nNln og�so= I- gA - [� fim ! ^Z mm� � R7 vZi 1?n o�� soo � r'C, z v�rmm^ =O2 z 7,-A m- to m A p A O n m N t 11 Am ZOO NA, O6g SO �vgm>nV; m 3 N n n n m Z A U1 ! r m N A�l x c� L) .T1 o -D n = m rn g �n D 4 NEW ENTRY FPL SUBSTATION 2Dw ZDW II 20W ID u a. b. ellp s. m 0 PFypV I DE g6 o- OSDMIA J C13 QJ H Z W U • U St ■ ■■■■■■ COVER AND GROUND • U It t ;ED to 2 to z RIGHT. ■ ■ ^1 59 SD II F U ANCHOR EINFORCING STEEL L 1 I I l w }b -� ---- > O yI I ae v 11 STATE OF FLORIDA AS i Ln .% ; " 1 PRESERVE LJ I.w.,• AREA x z. SEAL >1 a j .j 1.38 Ac 2Dw ZDW II 20W ID u a. b. ellp s. m 0 PFypV I DE g6 o- OSDMIA J C13 QJ H Z W U le ] 9 a) a ■ ■■■■■■ COVER AND GROUND LUG BEHIND COVER. ;ED ASE COVER. SEE NOTE S. RIGHT. ■ ■ ^1 59 SD II F U ANCHOR EINFORCING STEEL L 1 I I l is i.P i ___ _ -_________ -� ---- ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE 11 STATE OF FLORIDA AS a) lab+ bnsq.nN I.w.,• u) D•ero., x z. SEAL >1 t v u ) v wpm to t»[ . r�,IOI tm rsmucnva � -) ) -a : -a t u -x..o orals A an0 OIl 2 rx -.po -tom °)_ RE �J sm ICU® fM 1vT1631 • ) c -x nn 1) 15 ) . . -� . SIF -.. 1 nTlO rx- .eD- W -Y7 -4L WL °aIM1FD L!/ 1z9 t SJ ae 9n.0 e.e iv .0 ] a R . PBVII. PISPCT. COOM - V. ]. no ).e L11 nn• 671{2- 1. 1' 31J 17 ]t i.7 1. 20 2-0 -L am 1.3 n0 SJ ab•••✓✓✓ S. 1! lJ i.9 19 1. 11 f 0 19 7.2 7.1 a5 LO 1.2 S1Naf tlOD nT+• N1p.alA1; WM afA9 ,d . CaQ Naf Wa l]0 )S. ¢0 KA KA 111 t0 tp S Rabb K PAL G••ry, R P.9.Ctr re lI•b 1.rr Myiypq l.J 1. . 1 s•Itu esm 6750 e.c -tOD -w uqQ nh( iMU iw�wu ]p -1 • e.b a. Se ).i t,l 93 7A ,.e0 - ° � „m a. �t Je is sw2 6 0 e N -�� B a•Ol wporT 1. 1.5 12 Si 4S S 0 S1 H 45 46 47 .S S S S 5 S a2 - - - -- �� s ]I 4.6 i.a U TO S 1) Sl 21 tx m. scut 70 Ste- n7so mrloo-l.t A l MMw 2 14 i.) l.f S. Sa n3 tlx! S0 i:A ]e N ! mL is i.J i. 1e ]. Amr U) to 55 54 >e 1A i Sp a. ❑ 53 • Sx s �r 5 p b. l.! OL ) el S♦ f_WM 2 -STORY 5 2 • f- . e 1J .• Is ve 7ie 15 r' COMMERCIAL BUILDING 51 �3 v xe xe ze. u x1�. i.e le le v It �y OFFICE 2ND FLOOR 5° 10 14 RETAIL 1ST FLOOR l 1.6 4.2 1p 17 _ _ _ _ _ 5 13 . 2 5 ) 2] 1! 10 i.e 756 . J 52 ° "ve S) is St is 5 11 a %-2 t J2 J1 6B .� 1 Sx Ss S) 1. 1. 6 fe SZ 225 t ).0 11 ).e 1 t _r i 0, ]p Sp .E! le 1.3 3.0 ae ] e e Sp {p - J 1J t.et i 1 ti, 1p 1J 16 i.2 .n .2 .2 1.2 n0 `n! -t ¢! tt 1.. 1.1 to 13 1.a 10 13 1e at 1. a2 i.. i.1 12 6 11 S3 V. 1 . -2t ii ml ) a73i9 15 n9 �.i.Q l.> le .2f -_13 to ). nJ a0 aR 1 9 ) • t �1�.� sLZ -::iii 1a ie 22 2Dw ZDW II 20W ID u a. b. ellp s. m 0 PFypV I DE g6 o- OSDMIA J C13 QJ H Z W U POLE CAP, FURNISHED- AND INSTALLED BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR I w -r FLOOD LICHT _ooD ucHT BRACKET, SE ENLARGED CROWN DETAIL E NOTE 7. WARE STRAIGHT STEEL POLE ACCESS HOLE WITH ■ ■■■■■■ COVER AND GROUND LUG BEHIND COVER. ;ED ASE COVER. SEE NOTE S. RIGHT. ■ ■ ■■■■■■■ ROWN. TOP OF CONCRETE II F U ANCHOR EINFORCING STEEL L 1 I I l RE ;w-j ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE 11 STATE OF FLORIDA AS a) lab+ bnsq.nN I.w.,• u) D•ero., SEAL M lOOILT W .l1 1M T )R¢M6 w1T e[ s,z wpm to t»[ . r�,IOI tm rsmucnva -) ) -a : -a t u -x..o orals A an0 OIl 2 rx -.po -tom °)_ RE sm ICU® fM 1vT1631 • ) c -x nn n 2 x ) so -� . SIF -.. s,NU .p•po nTlO rx- .eD- W -Y7 -4L WL °aIM1FD L!/ a TP IYN. .^f Ai/� wMM . PBVII. PISPCT. COOM - slat nn• 671{2- >)ti.e/•z y �wec. am 1.3 n0 KA KA m 10 w..nrALLRmQ - C•er• BL f .{� f al S1Naf tlOD nT+• N1p.alA1; WM afA9 ,d . CaQ Naf Wa l]0 )S. ¢0 KA KA 111 t0 tp S Rabb K PAL G••ry, R P.9.Ctr re lI•b 1.rr Myiypq ) eQ s•Itu esm 6750 e.c -tOD -w uqQ nh( iMU iw�wu at• t,l .J ,.e0 2)i >A S Je is sw2 J.00 ¢7s• u•• -sa. a•Ol wporT ebww.. au a2 ..0 r.5. 2m m• s t tx m. scut ®0 n7so mrloo-l.t -v -E MMw lu 7.1 n3 tlx! Je.so N ! ! aApo. oeKnlo. ee1G)Ee RTLFGTw IrITAtG1 ` tt/06 /26m Amr U) POLE CAP, FURNISHED- AND INSTALLED BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR I w -r FLOOD LICHT _ooD ucHT BRACKET, SE ENLARGED CROWN DETAIL E NOTE 7. WARE STRAIGHT STEEL POLE LIGHTING STANDARD ELEVATION E0.1 NOT TO SCALE /3 TIES 12' O.0 VERTICAL 2 -t/2- SECTION A-A S� ®RT7Rl7l�l� FACIL��DESIGN' ENGINEERING 200 WILMOT ROAD DEERFIELD, IL 60015-0616 PRCT�PE DRAWINGS I SPECFICATKX6 BY: ❑ WALGREENTCONSULTANT ® LANOLORD'S CONSULTANT ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK, UNLESS NOTED OTNERWW_ BY: ❑ WALGREENS CONTRACTOR ® LANDLORDS CONTRACTOR (TURNKEY CONSTRUCTION) STORE BUILDING NEW ....... ® NON-24 HR STORE. REMODELING... ❑ NEW.......... RELOCATION... ❑ EXISTING ...... ❑ OTHER........ ❑ NBNSHELLONLY. ❑ CITY O� PALM 8GH GLX -1 'JUN 19 2007 PI AWNP` �, 70NINP sal , 11 -17-06 RAD REVISION TO PHOTOMETRICS 11-0245 ales REVISION TO PHOTOMETRICS 1 092506 RAD REVISION TO PHOTOMETRICS 1]005 RAD REVISION TO REAR COMPACTOR AREA 2.1605 RAD PHOTOMETRICS FOR CANOPY a DW VE -TH 1 1i -1601 RAD REVISION TO SITE A PHOTOMETRICS NO. I DATE I BY DESIMPTTON REVISIONS r FQTIMI ATN sun -11 ` ACCESS HOLE WITH ■ ■■■■■■ COVER AND GROUND LUG BEHIND COVER. ;ED ASE COVER. SEE NOTE S. RIGHT. ■ ■ ■■■■■■■ ROWN. TOP OF CONCRETE BASE TO SHED WATER. ANCHOR EINFORCING STEEL LIED NISH GRADE INSTALL CONDUIT LIGHTING STANDARD ELEVATION E0.1 NOT TO SCALE /3 TIES 12' O.0 VERTICAL 2 -t/2- SECTION A-A S� ®RT7Rl7l�l� FACIL��DESIGN' ENGINEERING 200 WILMOT ROAD DEERFIELD, IL 60015-0616 PRCT�PE DRAWINGS I SPECFICATKX6 BY: ❑ WALGREENTCONSULTANT ® LANOLORD'S CONSULTANT ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK, UNLESS NOTED OTNERWW_ BY: ❑ WALGREENS CONTRACTOR ® LANDLORDS CONTRACTOR (TURNKEY CONSTRUCTION) STORE BUILDING NEW ....... ® NON-24 HR STORE. REMODELING... ❑ NEW.......... RELOCATION... ❑ EXISTING ...... ❑ OTHER........ ❑ NBNSHELLONLY. ❑ CITY O� PALM 8GH GLX -1 'JUN 19 2007 PI AWNP` �, 70NINP sal , 11 -17-06 RAD REVISION TO PHOTOMETRICS 11-0245 ales REVISION TO PHOTOMETRICS 1 092506 RAD REVISION TO PHOTOMETRICS 1]005 RAD REVISION TO REAR COMPACTOR AREA 2.1605 RAD PHOTOMETRICS FOR CANOPY a DW VE -TH 1 1i -1601 RAD REVISION TO SITE A PHOTOMETRICS NO. I DATE I BY DESIMPTTON REVISIONS r FQTIMI ATN sun -11 ` I■■ ■ ■■■■■■ I■■ ■■■■■■■ • to SO ■ ■ ■■■■■■■ Wp I■rinr"aa` ;w-j ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE 11 STATE OF FLORIDA AS ■ ■ ■ ■�ii'SriFhf11 SEAL a e VNC I.V. tNRR71I PROJECT NAME WALGREENS STORE SWC- CENTRAL BLVD. a DONALD ROSS DR.. PSG PALM BEACH GARDENS, P. B. COUNTY, FLORIDA DRAWING TITLE PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN a DATA CADD PLOT: SCALE: AS NOTED DRAWING NO. 091607 S DRAWN BY: WGCRTTERA: RAD 2007 DATE JIM MR E 0. 1 A g PROJECT NO: m.•,. REVIEWED BY: FPL SUBSTATION NEW f U 11 20 2 ze z L I DRAWINGS I SPECIFICATIONS BY: ❑ WALGREENS' CONSULTANT ® LANOLORDS CONSULTANT I I STORE BUILDING NEW .......... ® NON -24 HR STORE . REMODELING ... ❑ HEW.......... RELOCATION ... ❑ EXISTING ...... ❑ OTHER........ ❑ NEW SHELL ONLY. ❑ Q O ' l 0 51 6 W w PRESERVE AREA a J l R� // �� I .r 1.38 Ac ].e 1 b v a ^"S a9 S0 -�• 59 60 /'� 0.5 a/ a _ ___ T -• - mot--------- ______ 5LE 2 2 S) V. It 1Rr a.] to >.+ L0 >.x a. i + L S+ !] a1 ip a.e ' ap 7.J a0 7.J a.l 1 2 11 iJ L/ LO 19 •b`,_ -� , + XD iJ z i5 SD 19 U 1. 11 15 15 1] a.6 14 LD ).0 Lt 14 a.. .s 16 31] ]) 11 St 16 19 �1M!!�7 19 17 S] L) 14 19 iR 15 12 Se L] )4 L/ LJ 19 1.. 6 1 03 1 ib !B la 15 1 SJ \9 1 14 It 1 3 S9 >.x 7,4 L5 6.0 9.2 ) L/ at S/ L 93 79 v �' ,1 y a ° e i • u Y a�] 11 i.J a.] s s ° a.. a.s. 12 St 4D 1t 41 45 - _ - :4 a•,♦ 2 le 14 a+ iO s s I6 47 45 e ; L. .a 11 if 2 Ii II` x Sa i.9 S6 S] 'o Y, n) T - _ - - _ -i 5 m - 1] a.] a.0 1a 1. 5 isil _ V. tU 5 ,) i 12 Ss�J✓ T ❑ >e 42 a� t. 1/ 0.t 53 N *I} n r` 9 ` a.t a.l S) R.] SASE -� 52 Die a] v ]. 2-STORY 51 9 .�i�:�'i.o as 1] COMMERCIAL BUILDING a19 M ze za x9 OFFICE 2ND FLOOR a.e 1s Se v 11 zD z. } • _ _ _ _ _ _ �+ 43 e 2 RETAIL 1ST FLOOR 43 / a./ a.x ao v s wz v la ae 7 52 92 5 1St i+ a a.2 eSD aL 1 1 12� 11 1. at ) ' _�.}.. 5 529 1 + a0 S+ 7.a 1 D- 19 S9 - ti.I� la a.] 5.0 ►6'! • I ;-�. ')u `l.) 1.6 lu > 1 + a. 19 1] .Ra S/ a2 - LT3R a.t 14 `I r !•. �f7 a7 1.D ns 9a5 +a l.. l.t +D 12 ,n zD 1] 1. a.+ a.. a2-A. a4 a.a 12 e ! >.l SJ a,0 ] - - r[_ �zl L ns 2a 17 n7 .L _L9 +.5 -9.e� +.) ze �f - - -,�x 1a 15 le 1> sa L+ >4 a] LD V, 1 _i~. zs na _ t + t _ t.e ).9 zo 10 s2- .+•4 a 4 + - S) X a Y l.a- .1 .. :j. 3�•, 1 �`� 3i i/ 1. ix ':SW s_ - z5w mW z5W zoW o• I 1 1 I I 1 2 PROVIDE B8. o- OSDMH J m H Z W U POLE CAP, FURNISIED- AND INSTALLED BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR I m�U 0�z N z FOw <Fw 7 i LIGHT BRACKET. ENLARGED CROWN DETAIL IGHT STEEL POLE �Wff TYPE DRAWINGS I SPECIFICATIONS BY: ❑ WALGREENS' CONSULTANT ® LANOLORDS CONSULTANT I I STORE BUILDING NEW .......... ® NON -24 HR STORE . REMODELING ... ❑ HEW.......... RELOCATION ... ❑ EXISTING ...... ❑ OTHER........ ❑ NEW SHELL ONLY. ❑ NOTE B FOR POLE SELECTION. -�► iWW -- � =a� i I�►r -- J l R� // �� I l"plf IN I I I 1 I t v1 les/ Mq+�l lw,... W 0.vW9w r-- M SDaCT r 4ll 11P[) Yfa1111.3 W]7 e2 �o L t sIJ -2.90 oflas 3-3a06 n>so REVISION TO REAR COMPACTOR AREA SIE -] • -] 2 -3 110.fD A Ill[ • 9DaIRM (SII f61RUC ➢O4 2 -164DS COVER AND GROUND PHOTOMETRIC$ FOR CANOPY S DRIVE -TH 1 12 -1561 aw REVISION TO SITE S PHOTOMETRIS mr x rx- .pD- 9,..r -a2 seE> rra]aom .N mtl.9sy °o_ SEE ENLARGED CROWN OF RIGHT. REVISIONS SIE -) a10► LA am - 2 GL- 400-1.ti11T_SU r.R.tt Sf1r1rY ' ROWN. TOP OF CONCRETE a >tF -9r 91nf 400DO am [Al- .ao- w -YT -aL rtu wN,m lr� 4kTw. uw. aw r 1•v/1�, rNl 1 1'ba+ P1speTe COOPER FOUR (4) ANCHOR BOLTS SUPPLIED A A 91st .0020 am 1Sn9)- H/C.aw//t uR .rr.rca rc am a] m atA >• 10 aw 14 1,.re vAL!AIp6g _ C911l0 6L A {� f ae Sr6F 9200 aTSO pD1W41]Il; rM aE.. >m a fA¢ 4,9f ay.wmy f. 4.10 114 Qa aw Nw Sh 10 q Rrr R( I.B. W9WR 2L P.B.CIY CONCRETE BAS E ) eoL 911aE Yoo nne wr -loo-w umu Dref n.0 nn9w,e ft ll9 11J ..] st 16r. 9Rwtt BELOW MIN. 30') VERTICAL I C(ONTRACTOR REE F FIXtM n)sB MR -501 ypp fyq) Ow•s,e ft L15 a2 to tSt im 1a/ a ! fnpxstBD t2 ID. 992 eeaD a>5o 2Pa`100- 1.t -v -E .ea Drf2:>,D. 9..GTLS A Mt.sa• i. ]6! ).) a2 1BE ]a!p M ! s • pDTtGitlt MT.t41 -1 11 /IM/2�j f�'•f Y om u POLE CAP, FURNISIED- AND INSTALLED BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR I m�U 0�z N z FOw <Fw 7 i LIGHT BRACKET. ENLARGED CROWN DETAIL IGHT STEEL POLE �Wff TYPE DRAWINGS I SPECIFICATIONS BY: ❑ WALGREENS' CONSULTANT ® LANOLORDS CONSULTANT I I STORE BUILDING NEW .......... ® NON -24 HR STORE . REMODELING ... ❑ HEW.......... RELOCATION ... ❑ EXISTING ...... ❑ OTHER........ ❑ NEW SHELL ONLY. ❑ NOTE B FOR POLE SELECTION. iWW =a� 11 -i7-0e RAO o 114)2-05 lsn, REVISION TO PHOTOME'TRICS �o 5543-06 RAO REVISION TO PHOTOMETF" ACCESS HOLE WITH 3-3a06 RUO REVISION TO REAR COMPACTOR AREA 2 -164DS COVER AND GROUND PHOTOMETRIC$ FOR CANOPY S DRIVE -TH 1 12 -1561 RAD REVISION TO SITE S PHOTOMETRIS LUG BEHIND COVER. DATE °o_ SEE ENLARGED CROWN OF RIGHT. REVISIONS CERTIFICATION AND SEAL ASE COVER. SEE NOTE 6. mOi� ROWN. TOP OF CONCRETE BASE TO SHED WATER. z ? FOUR (4) ANCHOR BOLTS SUPPLIED A A EINFORCING STEEL ,1 WITH POLES. 1 r3 TIES - STORE NO. 00000 PROJECT NAME WALGREENS STORE SWC- CENTRAL BLVD. d DONALD ROSS DR. PSG PALM BEACH GARDENS, P. B. COUNTY, FLORIDA DRAWANG TIRE PHOTOMETRIC SRE PLAN t DATA NISH GRADE 12. O.C. DRAW' NO E 0.1 A CONCRETE BAS E DATE Jun 2007 REVIEWED BY_ - - INSTALL CONDUIT FROST LANE S B�ELE�CiRICAL BELOW MIN. 30') VERTICAL I C(ONTRACTOR REE F FIXtM MFARKS) i1 TO OTHER FIXTURES. 2 -1�2• SECTION A -A A A �+ LIGHTING STANDARD ELEVATION E0.1 NOT TO SCALE E� i FACILITIES 200 WILMOT ROAD DEERFIELD, IL 600154616 TYPE DRAWINGS I SPECIFICATIONS BY: ❑ WALGREENS' CONSULTANT ® LANOLORDS CONSULTANT ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE• BY: ❑ WALOREENSCONTRAcroR ® LANDLORD'S CONTRACTOR (TURNKEY CONSTRUCTION) STORE BUILDING NEW .......... ® NON -24 HR STORE . REMODELING ... ❑ HEW.......... RELOCATION ... ❑ EXISTING ...... ❑ OTHER........ ❑ NEW SHELL ONLY. ❑ 11 -i7-0e RAO REVISION TO PHOTO►£IRICS 114)2-05 lsn, REVISION TO PHOTOME'TRICS ♦ 5543-06 RAO REVISION TO PHOTOMETF" 3-3a06 RUO REVISION TO REAR COMPACTOR AREA 2 -164DS RAO PHOTOMETRIC$ FOR CANOPY S DRIVE -TH 1 12 -1561 RAD REVISION TO SITE S PHOTOMETRIS NO. I DATE BY DESCRIPTION REVISIONS CERTIFICATION AND SEAL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN AND SPECIFICATION WAS PREPARED BY LE OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER (RIDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA AS SIGNIFIED BY MY HAND AND SEAL A A 1 STORE NO. 00000 PROJECT NAME WALGREENS STORE SWC- CENTRAL BLVD. d DONALD ROSS DR. PSG PALM BEACH GARDENS, P. B. COUNTY, FLORIDA DRAWANG TIRE PHOTOMETRIC SRE PLAN t DATA c AD_ PLOT: OB-IB-07 SCALE AS NOTE) DRAWN BY: RAID DRAW' NO E 0.1 A WG CRITERIA 2007 DATE Jun 2007 REVIEWED BY_ PROJECTNO: �.._ J I II ( I II II II - II II I II J II II )1 II 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i II I I 11 I I I I I I it LL _ 11 II I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II II I� 11 I 11' 11 I 11 II X111 'll 111 11 i11 11 11 11 it 11 11 N GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 60 " . 30' General Notes RAMPS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL SIDEWALK/ RAISED CURB INTERSECTIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITI ADA AND THE FLORIDA HANDICAP ACCESSIBILITY CODE THE LANDSCAPE SHALL AVOID CONVICTS NTH UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE AND UTIUTIES- THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. TREES SHALL BE POSITIONED TO AVCID CONFLICTS PATH SITE UGMTING. ALL LANDSCAPE SHALL CONFORM TO THE REOUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES I.E. TRANSFORMERS. SWITCH BOXES AC CONDENSORS AND ALIKE SHALL BE FULLY SCREENED FROM MEW ON THREE SIDES NTH LANDSCAPING. THE LANDSCAPING SHALL EXTEND TO THE TALLEST POINT OF THE UTILITY EOWPMENT AT TIME O PLANTING. ROOT BARRIER 94ALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL SHADE TREES WITHIN RANTING ISLANDS IN PARKING TRACTS OR ADJACENT TO SIDEWALKS LESS THAN SIX FEET IN MOTH. TYPE 0 RAISED CONCRETE CURB MG SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND ALL PLANTING ISLANDS WITHIN VEHICULAR USE AREAS. ALL AREAS SHALL BE FULLY IRRIGATED IN ACCORDANCE NTH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS LDR'S. ALL SIDEWALKS SHALL BE A MINIMUM O S FEET IN MOTH PER THE LDR•S ALL PAVEMENT MARKING N40 STRIPING EXCLUDING PARKING STALLS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THERMOPLASTIC MATERIALS ALSO. PAVER BRICKS OF APPROPORIATE COLOR SHALL BE USED, IN UEU O PANT OR THERMOPLASTIC MATERIAL ENTRY SIGN SHALL BE ILLUMINATED WITH A GROUND MOUNTED FIXTURE ON PHOTOCELL (BRONZE UTE RSIOOhHF 100 W METAL HALIDE). BULOMG LIGHTING AT ENTRY AND DOORS SHALL BE ON PHOTOCELL THE BUILDING DESIGN SHALL MAXIMIZE THE USE OF ACCEPTED DESIGN PRINCIPLES THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN REFLECTS INITIAL LIGHTING VALUES N ACCORDANCE WITH THE REOUIREMENTS O CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS &'S. AN ACCESS EASEMENT OVER THE INTERNAL ROADWAY NETWORK AND TO THE LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WILL BE PROVIDED IN FAVOR O THE CITY TO PRCMDE ACCESS TO THE INTERNAL LAKES. P16OR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT. THE APPLICANT SHALL PROMOE A LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION FROM ALL APPROPRIATE UTILITY OWNERS PROVIDING FOR PAVEMENT. WALKS PAVERS, LANDSCAPE AND STORMWATER FEATURES WITHIN THEIR EASEMENTS. SIDEWALKS ALONG CENTRAL BOULEVARD AND DONALD ROSS SHALL BE CO- LOCATCO WITH THE REQUIRED UNIT II PERIMETER BERM. ALL HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE RAMPS SHALL MEET ALL ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL REGIONAL. STATE AND FEDERAL ACCESSIBILITY GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS. ANY MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER -O- RECORD. I L "ITE HOT VICINITY MAP SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 42S, RANGE 41E SITE DATA OANewP123.PA -'EEECTONh OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS Y.Q P.RRIfl6 LOT AREA 166,347 SF 3.82 AC PRESERVE AREA 62,726 SF 1.44 AC NET LOT AREA 103.621 SF 2.38 AC 100% BUILDING AREA 25,929 SF 0.59 AC 24.88 IMPERVIOUS AREA 84.801 SF 1.95 AC 82.0% OPEN SPACE RED. 15.550 SF 0.36 AC 15.0% OPEN SPACE PROV. 18.820 SF 0.43 AC 18.0% ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE PROV. 3,270 SF 0.07 AC ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE RED. 1.055 SF 0.02 AC I L "ITE HOT VICINITY MAP SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 42S, RANGE 41E SITE DATA OANewP123.PA -'EEECTONh iG L.JCA9L.Er�O�i Y.Q P.RRIfl6 . St. — LAND U6E 0NlF TION NIVI EAMTNO ]VIRNO m,GHATXX< Pd P.gPOSEDZONNOLFSIFAMTXXI Ptq Pao PE mNO.: TaD ROODZOE PAMEl NO ROODZOnf 1l0KAn! e TOTALaREAAFA PROPOSEDODMYEPCNL PROP051:D RE«FNTWI O LMG WTS REPOM.NL ME I PROJECT LENiTYMTE euAw.DerDRis TsTOVfs MXO LANDIiE CMICIAATIDN RE&OTITML 1 MAA EO\I COMMBiML oPENSP.Q DRe11 »I ax J rvrf aF oWNERwP PeN.rz TUFRO DEIERAYKIN IAND USf KLOGTON T— ITEAREA ne, OPENSP. C.LCLAATKYl! .un wNeTAL en PRESERVE CALCUA " INN PARNND CALNIARONS ARaoemL�Ee Hxe+. �� RoJr ^� COMI01GMl vw, l •AIR KPrHRLw .. n WANlR —.a— iG L.JCA9L.Er�O�i CXUIRl MCNT — vnovoeao Ci Tfl'ITpN eel,•�o s.Lar.Aee Te -.Ne ..P.R D Gwn. Tn. v.n.,n^ ReR. N.... . P..ee» PN.v P...a.. � uLA.v.ro � P w� ..�o.�.R eew� ai�...v. r• Yv. icP.�cuvw ..cwpw.�,o'ra .a Te -D 1 Ln. R.«,nv RP.�« , «...R ,n . ��• • •« •pLp'�•pe.xnna K mG1 TR.Ala NNCCTONi a Tn 1. ..............,• Jr ..... M.w. � �rq..q 1.ea^ �a ' M.P.. .aYRCe v.wHJw w. bR 1.1 dl- P . ...man .... c.......,�,., .�.... M n...ro .....Pr ».n .... IRAQ PR.^n.vr.....N v.. e. F PALM 'BCI 1NG & ZON 3 REVISIONS Ll V '000 00 m I I eN G NN `V r v tv C N 7 ] !2 c V) � 'a �n § G w O w 0 ® O W ne m' ® z 0 PSI W LL w H z w Cr 00 S U F�1 w ¢ W CO J a W I rKQ z w r I— 7 J Q r ^ ^ O �J L1 j+ n z IXi n n°o a_ O I °�atA o SEAL S/IEET 40, SP -1 COMMERCIAL M iJi -11 0.? C�5 11 :7 1-6 :3 11 ic 0�9 C 7 a 6 G1.5 05 0.6 11.6 1.15 16 .5 )il ai 0-6 05 0.5 '35 :5 '35 C5 Ii J5 ;.j D.8 C.7, 0.5 0.4 C.4 -,3 -33 3 urtun a3 n - - -- - - - -- - _ -- -- - -- - -- - - - _ - -- - ' - 3.2 23 13 6 1 c.3 ?.3 2.4 Rz 2.'. �?2 �2 21 2.0 Is 1 0 i 3 .2 23 1,7 2.1 2 U 2.2 ea 0 -.0; Z5 "8 .8 23 5 Urban Planning & Design ?.3 2IIi -.1 C 22 1 !'2 3 24 22 1 2 e,j 2m2l q C Landscape Architecture 2 19 -8 ; Communication Graphics 49 32 E.2 19 i�3 L9 19 Im9 i9l 2�: 23 2.4 5 25 2 ?.5 26 R.G 2.5 2.3 2.J 3 ?3 24 23 22. 22 4 -,3 21 f": POLE DETAIL 5 22 1 imm : , '-LJC4ff - 17 1--!- - - . ENTICAL The Loft at City Place 15 aw 477 S Rosemary Ave., S.ft 225 -4 40 28 2? 1S :3 19 1? 1 EmC _u 22 2.3 2- 26 2m7 E- si� 2.6 e.5 23 ? 23 2.3 23 23 23 3 ?3 2.3 2.3 2 1 West Pa;m Beach. FL 33401 20 1 7 15 I 561.366 -1700 Fs, 561 366.1111 3, 21 1 2 D 2�! 2 t! 0 2C c_ 2 7 29 -7 2 i �!.6 25 2.1 22 s F 2.4 4 P- P= 81 -211 2. Email CADCD.d ... I.-c.. c 25 2 :1 22 a 9 20 2D 2- 2' t 2�1 2 3.9 38 21 42.3 -4 2 F. 22 9 4.9 2.9 2�4 2-',,,' 2., 12 23 2m4i 25 6 2�il E A 2 -,2 62 3m7 2.6 2.2 22 3 6 P- 4.5 3.2 - 2.4 v I 2.9 51 t.P --5 ?.7 �8 a6 1 ?7 P8 28 2 3 29 23 2m9 ?.7 23 2,- 21, -5 2 _1� 2,& 2�7 26 ik, G 3 1 3-, , . - I rM 14A,mm I i 2,3 2.2 22 ---25 '94 as 2�3 LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS 34 I L I PER CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS rDDE-:X;D 0tvaoPmENT �l 2.1 21 22 0: I MIN AVERAGE FOOT CANDIES MAINTAINED IN VEHICULAR USE AREAS SKAL BE 1.5 Fr 8; 1 2m MAX AVERAGE FOOT CANDLES MAINTAINED N MEHICULAR USE AREAS SNAIL BE IO.n FC. _7 3. MAY FOOT CANDES ALLOWED V iiEhPCijVR AREAS SHALL BE tOLO FC. 0 :1 G 2.5 22 2.! 22 4, MIN AVVWF FOOT CANDLES MAINTAINED IN PEDESTRIAN AREAS SHALL BE 1.0 FC. 2.2 5. MAX AVERAGE DOT CANDLES MAINTAINED IN PEDESTRIAN ARiAS SHALL BE 10.0 ;,Cm .9 rS ALLOWED 94 D 6- MAX FOOT CANDUE EDEITRM AREAS SKALL aF iOD FC. al 2 5 �8 I i R T. MAX AVERAGE 'DOT CANDLES "NTA14ED ON PROPLRITY LINE SHALL BE 2.0 FC. ;.5 E!ml 2� - LIGHTING FIXTURE LEGEND UGHTING ANALYSIS LIGHTING ANALYSIS I - B. MAX FOO: CANDLES ALL(NIED ON PRO-�Ef?rr LINE 54A-L BE 5Z FC PARKING LOT a PROPEFITY LINE 9. MAX POLE HEIGHT IN PARKINn AREAS SHALL 2E 25 FEET. 21 2.; 2i 61 2,-.0 LITHONLA LIGHTING KVF 400M k5YLN EHS :F7 corts d5ts 10. VA PCLF HEIGHT IN PIDESTRM ARM ;4ALL BE 12 FEET Lmp(s) MH400/U B'038RI?001ij�T(4- FOOTCANDLES LES Z: 4 11 MAT OVERSPILI. ON ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS SHALL 3E 015 FC. H*RIZONIAL FOOTCANO ;5-Fa c itdt,t, file Kvf---tk943I.,e$ A-tr. Z-2 2�1 2 5 5, 4 G: Pit, itn-iie. 36000 1.! 1.-, w Wric Ile OL4 M-imum 4 -3 1,7 '-ht Loss ftictr C. 70G. 467 Minirriu.m. 1.1 13.0 41 2- ai < :C 4 3 tit iiIso- 20 .9 Avg. Mir 2-02 .2-6 2 3 2.1 2-' a. 3 mth,:�i,t 4.45 3 4 1 LLIT L401JNTING HEIGHT PER SYMBOI T, C-f V., 0.24 q=:L Eel LLJ 2-0 2.0 2.? t5 C LITHO114A LIGHTING KVF 400M ASID, -FIXTURE OUANTIre AND ARRANG;MENT. ■ ianp(s): MH4OO/U LIGHTING ANALYSIS 3 VARY PER PLAN. MoJNrNC HECHTS 2.0 9 at PER 1.11,11i, FIXTURE hors 0 123 3- PEDESTRIAN WALXWAYS 1 .3 1 1.,911 �.l PF--'*!,�'��- 9 IS 43, (f,_ 4 J4 titt .4f_ 20 HORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES 2.0 1. f 2 3 2.5 2 7 MC),JW'.NG WIGHT PER SYMBOL TC LEFT 5.4 1 .3.6 ■ I Mirii,utvi 1.3 a.4 --- 9 1.8 1 15, PIPE 71E.w-IN is 21 2 E Avg:Min 1.92 1 CAST NTO POLE. 24' YIN. Mox;M'n 4.15 2.3 2.3 Coof 0.35 1 0.7 • ! 4 3! = 0 01. 3 1.7 LE PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED SAOP DRAWING (1-IRTIFYING THE POLE ASSZMBLv FLORIDA BLDG COX 3EI! r. WILL WITHSTAND THE SOUT14 3 2,7 2.1 1.8 1.8 LE AND ASCU. CHAPTER 6 WIND VELOCITY: 146 MPH /4 INCLUDING 3-SECOND GUST FL 0 1; 25 2.2 !i 13 i 21 0.6 T! . 21 2.0 1.9 2 E 2 2.1 1.5 1.6 1 2.0 i.- 2 7 1; 2.1 a; - ---' - -- - CD -1" " 2.0 I.S, 2.1 2-4 4.1 0 a 3 ; 1 1" 24 2 3.7 2.3 2.0 21 2.4 2.5 2.6 2 5 2,2 2.1 2.1 1.9 1,7 1.9 2.3 7, 2 2 2 IX 9 1.9 3 2 2 ;J 3 C3 i j: 1.4 16 0.7 -- __ - I a 2 2.3 ! 9 P 0 2 i 2.9 2.7 12.2 2.4 2 3 3 3/4' P41^ a. 0 3 1 19 10 TYPE PRE STRESSED i2 Z 2.3 2. 1 4 2.3 4 2 t 6 2:1 2:1 21 25 :E 3 11 2:- 2 ,0 C(*,CR:,E POLE a ------ N I-E ALUMINUM JUNCTION 801 U.3 CWAIT�H'� U COVER GOULD SHANMUT *5 2 P 1 2 3 °l 21 2.2 2 4 2.4 2.5 26 2 2 q • 2 6 25 2 3 2.2 2 2 F 2 4 E 6 2 E- 2 2 7 -ii 2..S 2 2. 2.S 2 2 ?.0 1 7 GE9-11 -11 WUNE FUSE HOLDER W7.4 2-8307 a's LDER5 LOA FILMES &A OR 8309 3007 K 2.2 8 '20- -7- C/) 2 0 F 3 F-5 E-7 2.5 2 F. G 20 20 21 2 4 ?.5 2.6 2-8 2 6 a. 9. 7 7 2 5 2.5 25 2.4 3 2 2 P 5 2.6 2 6 2.5 2-5 2.� 3 FiNtSH GRACE 2.1 0.9 ? 3 i 7 P 0 25 3.4 34 22 i 19 19 21 21 5 2.7 2A 2 IS 2 4 ?.4 2.4 2.5 2 4 24 2 4 2.6 Z 2 P.4 2.4 --,3 2 CU 5 19 4.2 24 - 2-- -2 2A 8 3.0 4 2 32 , 2,� -, 2�4 2-- 2- 2.j 2.4 2� 24 Z 2.1 :.1 2.� 2- i2 ��6 F 3 2.2 is 2/0 CL: 2 3 _7 - 2.67 23 2.3 2. 1 7 R 2.5 2.1 20 L! L7 -B 146 33 2.4 1.9 2.0 4,2 24 .2.4 2 4 2 F 2 .5 20 1.9 CL L6 21 2 1; P 5 22 20 21 1.9 sag 4 2-2 t.5 13 L9 2.4 2.� L. GRCUND ROD 5/8"NA 10*-0' 03. ?C 7 3 2,2 22* 2 3 23 23 -2 4 1,4 11 4: 2 P 22 2.- 3 �41 a.' 19 CuPi CLAD 27 2.0 2 t.5 Le 2 3 2 2. 2',4 22 2.1 19 2 n T,9 211 0 1 La 2 C P-1 1. 1 21 22 21 1 !�9 . 6 :1 2.6 a P 8 15 13 ! -• i.- i 21 19 6 1 LIGHT POLE DETAIL 1 4 1. (1 1 � -- - nA 1.1 15 1 3 18 2 2 2.- 22 20 19 15 13 12 12 Ia 1 !.2 1.3 1.5, 18 18 18 17 1E Is I"? R 4 -k-z 1.6 s .6 16 1 19 13 2 3 22 2Z 22 20 17 5 4 1.3 1.4 i 1 13 1,3 1.3 1.5 1.- IS 16 16 1-9 1.8 1 iii 19 i 6 '6 ti 21 21 a 2i 7 E 2 P4 2,2 !.9• 4 1,5 16: +-,.4 1 15 16 2-2 16 i1 IT 2-7 IF 4.1 �5 2.3 ?6 2.0 16: 1.7; 4-14 i- I 1 5 ts :911 i!a 2.2 13 tu!p( -Al c W engineering &. _ . -.I -. I Scale: 176' -1•A' OONSMTANTS 8 2 4 1 A 3Z il. 4 3 15 C a 2 f. 6 Zi.? ME! C 2 a 03 1- J.- 3 3 Z 3 2 C 3 a.a a o, REOWIRKTION NUMBERS RESIDENTIAL Sheet 1 of 2 SITE DATA 2.57 AC Petition No. 38,064 SF Petition No. Tan Existing ZWng PO Proposed Zoning PUD(PO) Existing Land Use PO Proposed Land Use PO Proposed Use Medical 8 Professal Office Prerty Township. Range op e. 12, l3 Property Control Number 5143d2-08-00-0063020 Taal Site Area: 2.57 AC Gras Floor Area: 38,064 SF Medical OMce 22,000 SF Professional Office 16,064 SF From Setback Required: 25 it Front Setback Provided: 30 M See Setback Required: 15 fi Minimum Side Setback Provided: 90 6 Ricer Setback Required: 15 h Mktk,tum Rear Setback Provided: 86 it Lol Coverage Permined: 35% La Coverage Proposed: 17% Open Space Required: .39 AC - 15% Open Space Proposed: .57 AC - 22% Sidewalks .18 AC Other Pervious .39 AC Total Open Space .57 AC. Building Coverage .44 AC - 17% RoadICurbrParldng 1.56 AC -61% Taal Site Area 2.57AC - 100% Building Height Permitted Max. 3611 BukeV Heigh l Proposed 2 Stodes/Max 36 R Parking Required: 164 Spaces r" Medical Office (7 sp sf) 110 Spates Professional Office (1 spr" sf) 54 Spaces Parka g Provided: 166S Parking Size 10 X 18.5 Loading Spaces Required: 1 Space Loads g Spaces Provided: 1 Space Handicap Spaces Required: 6 Spaces Handicap Spaces Provided: 6 Spaces Bicycle Parking Regkied: 9 Spaces Bicycle Parkhg Provided: 9 Spaces r� LEGEIIp ws Aar • n4AIC rtwcsa arrw . KAr4osoA. Aar wac to rAwrcwte eAena* urban n 25.Q ACCESS EASEMENT SM , TO BE ABANDONED Courtyard Gardens Condo Office Complex Urban Planning & Design 25.0 SEACOAST EASEMENT Crnba slrw]uM Landscape Architecture r r TO REMAIN Zoning - Professional Office (PO) District clear Zone Communication Graphics O.RB. 2-5 PAGE 895 Future Land Use - Commercial (C) Exlsbrg po`°e' The Lofts at City Place Extolling Pole Np 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 8' Wood Fmwe Proposed West Palm Beach, FL 33401 O 1 Ir 1 Conba' Structure - Stop Sign and Stop Bar 561.366 -7100 b be installed by wo- Fax 561.366.1111 - 9.0' Lendecape Bulls kgnt pole bov IYp 'CURB - Email CAD�utlsonline.com +7 _ ` -1. CURB coora9m 11 I B ( O ` O C O .60r� olio bra wdy Uh and �^g an wn.o Ma II C( t0 2 ((C( - d t • e �J 60' x IAC es4gase 1I R30' II _ R50' F77FR5 SCN�P. t0'ryp R30 Or "II I'I'�"'a I I I loo �,, ma.lona nw e.agwtnau� Hc 11 Sea Dew 24 IF � STOP SIG'� 8 II R3U.0 E.'sbrg oak 86' Mir, I M z X Y 50 II - Trce lMpl 8.0 8.0 _l -CUR STOP BAR u�=ar.t baw IY 11 I TYR ���p^p HC Ramp 1115104 Y. d I I-9 O II i -_ 80 HC RAMP II - k •� S. Sidewalk -0' CURB SIGN: LOADING 2()rIE z, 7 NO PARKING TYP CUR 5 0 ! it 23.8 5.0 TYP. g O 18.5 24 0 -/- 18 5' --PROJECT SIGN 6' X 12- high P- - - 'El _ Lands lcavll Area I) 5 BICYCLE I 8.0' LandacePe BENCH & AS TRH SPACES ART W Buffer 100 RECEPTACLE PUBLIC t1- -_ PLACES 216.0 30 -i ■ � (f-c ' T :j. (_._ 78 Mm. I pkr i C'� h 11r Exiting _ ;! g R4.8 5- Sidewalk I I 8' Wood Fence 11 II -- 91.3' 0 0 CIO The Oaks Residential Community 0) Single- family detached cuR0 I L Zoning - Residential medium density (RM) 0 �I N D er 1 p I La do ids O Future Landuse_ Residential Low (RL) C) 11 I BICYCLE HG PARKING .rl M SPACES SIGN. TYP. O NO a II 43 - sosd LO Vitt I �_ � 1-7f, O�p q'r co 11 S >5' 60 11 5' Sidewalk -_ -;I t 1 O CN 8' Well i!`i 0 J6 II I Village Square Crossing 11 0 © ' ° © A 1 (n Office complex L I "' -o Zoning - Professional Office (PO) At B.B s c' I S.n J I Future Landuse - Professional Office (PO) R45.0, g © I ® - 24.0 i•✓ 4i�/ --�- s� 9 STOP BAR -� - r, I ^�,M AND Sf 80' R6.0'_ Cc Rt0.0 R3' R20.0' Cc (SS knca tf'P Lop 2. ling air • end M CL PM R20 01 -I-_ .05 R3 1 O 80" 80 ti 80 I I� I RTS' T O 21.0 Exbdng Oak 154 Existing Oak Trro flyp) M28'cakver s 461i p 0 1 S 88028'18" E 335.68' Sul.: 1' . 20.4- -- 0 10• 20' 40' Substance abuse treatment Zoning - Residential low density (RL3) Future LAnd Use - Residential Low (RL) Sheet 1 of 2 Waterers er to a more pa spaces a row t a bouary a the site. Parking let Island at the soudrem nd • Sec 78- 285, waiver to allow a ground sign at the Pond Of ingess / egress W the she. NOTES ALL HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE RAMPS SHALL MEET ALL LE LOCAL. REGIONAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL ACCESSIBILIT ITY GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS. ANY MODIFICATIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER-OF-RECORD. • BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS NOTED ON PLAN PROVIDED BY MIXON SURVEYING. ALL LAND AREAS WITHIN 150 OF THIS SITE ARE ZONED AND HAVE A FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION AS NOTED ON PLAN. ' SEACOAST UTILITY AUTHORITY WILL BE THE SOURCE OF POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICE. • ALL STOP BARS ROADWAY SIGNAGE, CROSS WALKS SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS AND TO BE CERTIFIED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER. SEE ENGINEERING PLANS FOR ALL CURB DETAILS, PAVER DETAILS AND ROAD SURFACE DETAILS. "ALL PAVEMENT MARKING AND STRIPING, EXCLUDING PARKING STALLS. SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH THERMOPLASTIC MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WIITH LDR SECTION 78- 3440. ALSO. BRICK PAVERS OF APPROPRIATE COLOR SHALL BE USED ON PAVER BRICK AREAS, IN LIEU OF PAINT OR THERMOPLASTIC MATERIAL' • ALL CURBS SHOWN ARE TYPE 'ED' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • ALL UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ARE PROPOSED UNLESS NOTED. 'ALL CURB RADII ARE SUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • ALL SURROUNDING INFORMATION IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. • ALL PROHIBITED PUNT SPECIES WILL BE REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND CONTROLED AFTER COMPLETION. r� LEGEIIp ws Aar • n4AIC rtwcsa arrw . KAr4osoA. Aar wac to rAwrcwte eAena* urban n 25.Q ACCESS EASEMENT SM , TO BE ABANDONED Courtyard Gardens Condo Office Complex Urban Planning & Design 25.0 SEACOAST EASEMENT Crnba slrw]uM Landscape Architecture r r TO REMAIN Zoning - Professional Office (PO) District clear Zone Communication Graphics O.RB. 2-5 PAGE 895 Future Land Use - Commercial (C) Exlsbrg po`°e' The Lofts at City Place Extolling Pole Np 477 S. Rosemary Ave., Suite 225 8' Wood Fmwe Proposed West Palm Beach, FL 33401 O 1 Ir 1 Conba' Structure - Stop Sign and Stop Bar 561.366 -7100 b be installed by wo- Fax 561.366.1111 - 9.0' Lendecape Bulls kgnt pole bov IYp 'CURB - Email CAD�utlsonline.com +7 _ ` -1. CURB coora9m 11 I B ( O ` O C O .60r� olio bra wdy Uh and �^g an wn.o Ma II C( t0 2 ((C( - d t • e �J 60' x IAC es4gase 1I R30' II _ R50' F77FR5 SCN�P. t0'ryp R30 Or "II I'I'�"'a I I I loo �,, ma.lona nw e.agwtnau� Hc 11 Sea Dew 24 IF � STOP SIG'� 8 II R3U.0 E.'sbrg oak 86' Mir, I M z X Y 50 II - Trce lMpl 8.0 8.0 _l -CUR STOP BAR u�=ar.t baw IY 11 I TYR ���p^p HC Ramp 1115104 Y. d I I-9 O II i -_ 80 HC RAMP II - k •� S. Sidewalk -0' CURB SIGN: LOADING 2()rIE z, 7 NO PARKING TYP CUR 5 0 ! it 23.8 5.0 TYP. g O 18.5 24 0 -/- 18 5' --PROJECT SIGN 6' X 12- high P- - - 'El _ Lands lcavll Area I) 5 BICYCLE I 8.0' LandacePe BENCH & AS TRH SPACES ART W Buffer 100 RECEPTACLE PUBLIC t1- -_ PLACES 216.0 30 -i ■ � (f-c ' T :j. (_._ 78 Mm. I pkr i C'� h 11r Exiting _ ;! g R4.8 5- Sidewalk I I 8' Wood Fence 11 II -- 91.3' 0 0 CIO The Oaks Residential Community 0) Single- family detached cuR0 I L Zoning - Residential medium density (RM) 0 �I N D er 1 p I La do ids O Future Landuse_ Residential Low (RL) C) 11 I BICYCLE HG PARKING .rl M SPACES SIGN. TYP. O NO a II 43 - sosd LO Vitt I �_ � 1-7f, O�p q'r co 11 S >5' 60 11 5' Sidewalk -_ -;I t 1 O CN 8' Well i!`i 0 J6 II I Village Square Crossing 11 0 © ' ° © A 1 (n Office complex L I "' -o Zoning - Professional Office (PO) At B.B s c' I S.n J I Future Landuse - Professional Office (PO) R45.0, g © I ® - 24.0 i•✓ 4i�/ --�- s� 9 STOP BAR -� - r, I ^�,M AND Sf 80' R6.0'_ Cc Rt0.0 R3' R20.0' Cc (SS knca tf'P Lop 2. ling air • end M CL PM R20 01 -I-_ .05 R3 1 O 80" 80 ti 80 I I� I RTS' T O 21.0 Exbdng Oak 154 Existing Oak Trro flyp) M28'cakver s 461i p 0 1 S 88028'18" E 335.68' Sul.: 1' . 20.4- -- 0 10• 20' 40' Substance abuse treatment Zoning - Residential low density (RL3) Future LAnd Use - Residential Low (RL) Sheet 1 of 2 • • • PARKING SPACE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE it 4' WHITE LINE PARKING SPACE DETAIL WITH OVERHANG NOT TO SCALE 2.5' VEHICULAR T OVERHANG 6" TYPE "D" CURB OR RAISED 4" WHITE SIDEWALK LINE 18.5' 16' I HANDICAP PARKING SPACE DETAIL WITH CURB OR RAISED SIDEWALK NOT TO SCALE /— HC SIGNS 2.5' OVERHANG SIDEWALK HC RAMP, \� WHERE DEEMED I NEEDED BLUE STRIPPING BLUE LINE NOTE: ALL HC PARKING STALLS SHALL MEET THE FLORIDA ACCESSIBILTY CODE FOR BLDG. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PLAN 10' BIKE RACK TREE WELL DETAIL NOT TO SCALE rxsnwc 1aFE Notesa IETANNO MALL TOE cMtST1I OF PRESSURE TREATED U*AMA OR OlEll APPItlYEO EQUAL (leLAR 70 AROFR FARMS PUHDO eAOlFR1 MATERIAL SEIAIL E CLEAR aNO (PA 65 to 7.0) AT TW OF FliHO/OM&IT� � TTON IOIOW Ili ' VEGETAD MM TE OIO rattle 1W TREE MPJW- 10 1' ROOK FU. a1PE7t110US AREAS VOEIt 11E 111EE ORPl1tE MITI ar OF 1/Y _ ALL MIN A Pt+ aF - TO 7.0. NA4( - PIOOR 10 O7 lml }} ptplAY SEPARATOR W TIE 0181E NON SEPARATOR CLAM (liE1E DI WTH DLEm FILL TO PROPOSED STRUCn11A1- 41B tlt.4'IE MATERIAL! ELEVAl101L� GRADE 41 70 PILL iUWK LL m� X=' PROTECTIW RA1S WL E PROW -U) MIERE REOU M E1Eeta1G OIAD ELEVATKM RANGE FROM aY TO a.1' - SEE 3URVEY FOR EXACT ElEVAi10115 PROPOSED TRADES aLL SEE A,opRO1N1A1ELY 7.5' 70 LfT M THE LANDSCAPE AREAS. EAOt OIJ( iREE 70 E PRESERVED ON =FT WILL E EVALUATED eor'DUALLY TO OETERI ME IIP1 YlC/l F ANY 1RFE HELLS 1l1 SE AEOIAAED. tN41 ae. e5 -45 (AE) Ser feu - PMOte4 � t-7i cdyayP- Front Elevation side Elevation NOT TO SCALE fxe�;<lM WOtOriM 5 /9-<u mu.a...q roN re. I ® � ,U• I yu7� II � � n 1 I II +li II II I II I II .II f. II I Plan View HeMi 110. eS -4e (AE) Belev -6rNe fNwtH Io M +H. ) �� T s.x.•v,a. - 1 w.. ieyv i i• Front Elevation S ide ueyat i all aRDERIM6 INFORMATION e�te- 5ielKibnel AOaI- (,p«a« (AO Yc(SOn, fMxrel<Stturi +( Bi k< ticks H.1e�lle. len9'n 3M '.. ;� Beby -EE4S l�LG,I ilp. es- 2600 R e5- A(ACl �'3" 3 e5- a5(AD er e4- .E(AE, • E) es- 4s(A & 85- 66 (AEA •. -,. , e5- as (AD a ax- ee 83-1M (AE) Y eS -'w(AV 12'-9' 11 as, 2S 00 er !S -130(AO 15'-1- td DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PLAN NOT TO SCALE I r . 17- DIAGONAL 12' YLE urban design stuclo Urban Planning & Design Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics The Lofts at Chy Place 477 S. Rosemary Ave.. Suite 225 Weal Palm Beach, FL 13401 561.366.1100 Fax 561. 766-1111 ErnaE CA04@udaOnEnacM cwr•luM Ae ..P,e..nra ev OAS ar..Yq •• o.�.e M uM a. oAwn a w e..piw.. am... q.o elna �t a r.e VY.> el.ae..a u...4n.� vim"+•!^^ a a. ara—. >oe NUme.: �r.r.l11L_ 0) ■ o u- m) = 00 W 2m; m N }i ao Scale: Not to Scale Sheet 2 of 2 I • ALLAMANDA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SDPBC PROJECT NO. 0101 -8227 PGAL PROJECT NO. 714 -06025 MODERNIZATION CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS SUBMITTAL PACKAGE 100% CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE III - RESUBMITTAL JUNE 26, 2007 THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PAUL BEACH COUNTY CHUM MR. TOM LYNCH VILEOVIFERSON MR BILL GRNUM Sl1PERRITE#DBif OF SCHOOLS ART#N C, JOHW RJR BOARD MEIME RS MONROE BE NAU MG DR SANDRA RIOLIDHD MRS PNAETTE SARDILTC DEBRA ROBINSON. MD HR MAW HANSEN PROJECT TEAM OwNut SCHOOL 001AICT OF PAW BEACH COUNTY (SOW ROPBLI FACLM AM CONWR1C11014 MANAGBIENT 3300 FOREST H14 SCUUMA D WEST PAW RAM FLORIDA 33491 ARCHRECT: PIE%M GOODYAI. ALE)MOETt 4 UNVILE. NC 701 PAW OF COMMERCE BOLAEVWO SURE 100 BOLA RATON, FL U497 TEL WI JKAM FAX Se1S1e31)02 STRUCTURAL ENGtgHt9: JOHNSON STRUCTURAL GROUP , INC, 1001) EAST IILSBORO BLVD. DE ERFIELD BEACH. FL 33441 TTY 954MIJM FAX 954.571 Sale MEP ENGINEER& LWI NC 1450 CBfTERPARK BLVD. SUITE 350 WEST PAW BEACH FLORIDA 33401 TEL 5$iJ@12= CNL EMINEEt4 8DTBOTILROW BNB!®W(i, INC. 3W0 NORTAVFBT ITH AVE. RM 1102 FT. LAUDERDALE R 37301 TEL 954M AN FAX 161d11.0137 LANDSCAPE ARCHITELM CURTIS 4 RROGERS DESIGN STUDIO, INC 3250 MARY STRffT SUrrE 301 COCONUT GROVE, FLORIDA 33133 TEL 3054121 T74 FAX 3054/5949/ SURVEYOR HEIM- WEAVER AND SHEREWA 310 SE 1ST STREET, &M 4 DE MY BEACT FLORIDA 33467 TB: W" FAXM1213S777 LOCATION MAP A 1070 ALLAAIAAmA OR., PAW BEACH GA iDUIS, Fl. 33!10 MAMAVAFIf plMtHtif M iOtltWl lWw�6 M pT�6f QAAR11w A1C M AYRII Y] qHi. AAW AA- Ai �A rrpa O M narri.r awwrsA a M watawr awls- a M amwr owes gOpl�MwaT�IHt MI ®NtpU� I1 -es M IOeH ilRi >M AamlAVa�@TOM4NIIMf WYe90 M Aae1W! awe -DM oeAAIIYI awe�10 tlpS tpw-� AOYAµ MI@O Wi.INL AAlAa1 a>Wii.R�A1�M0 A1[8a10 eLLN11Ul0 M�tminwlif�IWMVMV AACIYt•'OA6M 4itYrt101 AADLMOA tnYie SAM AYIY AF/di W�l IMAYlAOI aalm, nmA a)ttr.c tta .oAVI � \It OI L8t STATewff OF COMPLIANCE TO THE BEST OF W WCA MM THESE DRAINIMAN0 THE PRO ECf 3MYNAL ARE COMPERE AND COWILY WITH THE STATE REIXABERT FOR MrATOML FACUTES- RAW AMLE BOTBC RIYm49W 5CH00L -ar THE SCHOOL DISTWCT OF PALM BEAw COIRRY [T] WA34M (FI (581x3401 PGIL 791 PARK OF CCMJMEPXE BLVD. SWE 400 BOCA WON, FLIMM 33487 [T] 56, 9884= (FJ 56, 9883802 AIYIGT1RlA SCFmmooswaTm a)STRMON DOD -990 FFASE 114 RESLIBNRTAL 01014M rleicrmis 18100 ALm11W Or, Pin Beach Gates FL 33410 —W INI a SM7 eIo wMAVAn QT�Y.R/!•i� PHASE III CONSTRUCTION ',DOCUMENTS- SFEET im • • • INDEX OF DRAWINGS p All »e INE W,mA THE SCHOOL DOiTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY M (531N34 -M [F] (561A34-01 PGArbna 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SURE 100 BOCA RATOK FLORIDA 33687 (T] 561 988 4002 (F] 561 988 9002 RmArAn NRasrnllr= Al1AMAd7A EIEMFNTARf SCHCQ 110DSMATION COIL4TF01 nM DODAENIS Pik% IF RESIIBLOTTAL PnoaT �� cloi4 7 PI�IGT IDCASI� 70700 AbInvdl Dr, Palm Bwh Gadem R33410 —M, Ofiw tiAl Jyb mr�rt � m PHASE III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS .�T Trtu INDR SHEET VT7LULE 1 AO-01 UTEST 0LD6 Mn' – lA7ESf BIDC.D®f. s1EETt TIRE ONOfI OL IEVLSDM REASON APPROVAL SHIEEM TIRE ORD0IAL REVISION REV6CN APPROVAL DAZE AMMER DATE DATE DATE KAMER DATE 617E - - - AM COVER SHEET as. 47 - - - AON1 NDEX VOUEI 05.1141 App? GE14 RAL NOTES 05.1147 064147 SURVEY 061147 SURVEY 057147 CIVIL G0 COVER SHEET D611m WATFRAtO SARTARY SL'AEtRAI 6s11m 1 oaDSU7 PAV964TY40WG AD SIGNMf Cc-mP 061147 1 0a2tW 061147 1 OSCiD1 1 147 AVMG AND ORARKIE Aa3 1 1 G1p1 POLLUT1O11 AID EIDSION CDITTROL RAN 061147 1 0a03V07 LANDSCAPE L1 O TREE DISPOSITION RAIL 061147 i 0a25OR 1.1.1 PLANTAR PLAN 061147 ] Oa2507 L12 RAI4TNIG NOTES a OETAlS 05.1141 1 OVAIR 1 1 7 123 RUPSTATIONNCRE3 ARCHITECTURAL 05-1147 1 AlI PMTKLSCTER.W i Alp] PARTIAL SITE PLAN 061147 A1.01 PARTIAL SITE RA/ 064 147 A1.65 SITE SIGNAGE AND PARIRD DETAILS 061147 t A. COVERW AY DET. 1 AIM PLAY COORAD FIELD DETAILS 061147 At PLAY FIELD DETAILS 061147 A1.11 PLAYRXXNRAO FIEIDDETAaB 05.1147 A= adyA LROORRAR 05.114 A2.01A PMT41LPL"PLW 0i IV A2.016 PARTIAL F DOR RAN 061147 ALDIC PARTIAL FLOOR RAM 061147 AU ID PARTIAL FLOM RAN 0611 -07 A241E PARTIAL FLOOR RAN 061147 A2.01F PARTIAL FLOOR RAN 061147 A201G PARTIAL FLO R KM 65.1147 A2-M ROOF PLAN 05.1/41 A201 ROOF DETAILS 05.1147 M.O, EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 05.1147 M. EXTERIOR E EVATIM 061147 M.00 EXTERIOR EiEVATXM 0611 -07 Mp0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 061147 A4m EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 061147 M.OI EXTERIOR EEVATgNS 055.147 M.10 BULDNG SECTIONS 05.1141 A420 WALL SECTIONS 061147 M21 WALL SECTIONS 061147 M3D FLOOR PUN DUALS 061147 ELECTRICAL EW ELECTRIC 1. SITE RAN 061147 I p All »e INE W,mA THE SCHOOL DOiTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY M (531N34 -M [F] (561A34-01 PGArbna 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SURE 100 BOCA RATOK FLORIDA 33687 (T] 561 988 4002 (F] 561 988 9002 RmArAn NRasrnllr= Al1AMAd7A EIEMFNTARf SCHCQ 110DSMATION COIL4TF01 nM DODAENIS Pik% IF RESIIBLOTTAL PnoaT �� cloi4 7 PI�IGT IDCASI� 70700 AbInvdl Dr, Palm Bwh Gadem R33410 —M, Ofiw tiAl Jyb mr�rt � m PHASE III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS .�T Trtu INDR SHEET VT7LULE 1 AO-01 " 174 1;m I FI Ij It lilk I iz T m a 9- • 0 I am OFM c I 0 O 8 �z Zs 0 .8 V x ; PZ El. OVERALL SITE DEMOLITION PLAN imKoncum to a PLAT OF SIENA OAKS A P.UJL M CWMUWFua lummmm PLAT BOOK as, PACE 132-136 *n� ul V IN B@MlNBMK floomaRmumm fmOYaE WLMWJM oMMEIw awria 4 — ---------- X J.:-, y 111 ay' 0 x x . 9 W lA a p OVERALL SITE DEMOLITION PLAN J, r7r m 0 :0 cm wo x " 0 0 30 z 3► i DEMOunON GBEU NOTES .. wreE�sw.ewEraswQDe.wlaswr BEEF= eaDeQeM DEMOUTION CODED NOTES E -- ED El E] uslronnsmElEaomroaa • imKoncum a PLAT OF SIENA OAKS A P.UJL M CWMUWFua lummmm PLAT BOOK as, PACE 132-136 *n� V IN B@MlNBMK floomaRmumm fmOYaE WLMWJM oMMEIw awria 4 J, r7r m 0 :0 cm wo x " 0 0 30 z 3► i DEMOunON GBEU NOTES .. wreE�sw.ewEraswQDe.wlaswr BEEF= eaDeQeM DEMOUTION CODED NOTES E -- ED El E] uslronnsmElEaomroaa • imKoncum a M CWMUWFua lummmm 4w *n� V IN B@MlNBMK floomaRmumm fmOYaE WLMWJM oMMEIw awria 4 — ---------- X J.:-, J, r7r m 0 :0 cm wo x " 0 0 30 z 3► i DEMOunON GBEU NOTES .. wreE�sw.ewEraswQDe.wlaswr BEEF= eaDeQeM DEMOUTION CODED NOTES E -- ED El E] uslronnsmElEaomroaa • imKoncum M CWMUWFua lummmm sumcmmmpmml INUMMIEDENWIM IN B@MlNBMK floomaRmumm fmOYaE WLMWJM oMMEIw awria � 6 00111L i§ ffsommimcl OF moFWXBMCMRM r)mm IF] pqMaj rolncr ?GIL 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOG RATON. R.ORUDA 33497 M 501988 4002 IM 561988 3002 pmw1111e kLAMANDAEBMARY sow mmemim OOBTRL70DODIM AV& W REKSWITAL 01014W I=AbmwdiDr, plim and ordw R. 33410 E cro ovarn slower wiaaa ors o PHASE M tcwSTR cwl STE OBIOLMON PLAN DA.00 • • • 's 'I M 0 "o O z PLAT OF SIE14A OAKS A P.U.M PLAT BOOK 65, PAGE 132-136 SECTOR SECTOR Q A1.01 0-4 - - - - - - muw \7 paw— I I I i i ■•ra•r mica OM T C ---------- 0 0 r - 0.3" % A �O Iz. ., Mmm 'a I Imo. 0 ell -0 .............. M 5 16 6 1 30 4� di v r 0 0 ns - SECTOR C A1.03 G­C SCALE OVERALL SITE PLAN GENERAL DATA 1:=_ .8. AUA*W 0VWM WALKV COMCFETE PAW �AccEss FROPEM T lflE NEWrLFENCE M R ­aw WED " RM—a-0­EM.— •mEE . Rats ai ®E,nrt RNEM_M. THE SCHOOL OUW OF PALM BEACH COWN M (56 )434M ?GAL 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33487 M 561 9BB 4002 IFJ 561988 3002 kiAMANDA EDWARY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION CONSTRUCTION DOWMEWS PHASE 11F RESUBMTTAL (HD14W 10300 A■roxia Dr., Palm Beach C■dem R. 33410 —W- ovw AA_ iemiuia — — — — — — — — — — - 7 tz PHASE Ill CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, PLC WE RM A1.00 go L. F: M 0 z )o w ch 'o G­C SCALE OVERALL SITE PLAN GENERAL DATA 1:=_ .8. AUA*W 0VWM WALKV COMCFETE PAW �AccEss FROPEM T lflE NEWrLFENCE M R ­aw WED " RM—a-0­EM.— •mEE . Rats ai ®E,nrt RNEM_M. THE SCHOOL OUW OF PALM BEACH COWN M (56 )434M ?GAL 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33487 M 561 9BB 4002 IFJ 561988 3002 kiAMANDA EDWARY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION CONSTRUCTION DOWMEWS PHASE 11F RESUBMTTAL (HD14W 10300 A■roxia Dr., Palm Beach C■dem R. 33410 —W- ovw AA_ iemiuia — — — — — — — — — — - 7 tz PHASE Ill CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, PLC WE RM A1.00 • • • Ulm — - I. J, or I w w - , LQMtd----------------------------------------------------------------- ---- - - - - ----------- taatew ----------------------------------------------------- _______ -______ ML, a., 'aj-j WAIL wom w :ter L au'ur FILAAW PARTIAL NORTH Ak a \1 T 11 PARTIAL NORTH ELEVATION im UL.3iiEc,&lW-A -------------------------------------- ----- ---------------------------- I ------- I ----------- ----------------------------------------- --- • um� w FOBOItI W&WAMPL(M4 am 2�w �ml 4 1 ol 0=1 IL It'l, L 1m t ME Wk m�w-- wa "2 ntowu 1/8• =I'-O' NORTH ELEVATION —'t -_ . . . . . . . KEY -PLAN M SCHOOL OMCT OF PALUBEACHODUN7 M MK34-M F 1581]1318851 uiaRCr PGA 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33497 M 561 9884002 [F] 581988 ALLAMANM ElIkENTARY S MODERNIZATION ONISTMC" DOUNUM R" & RESUBMUTAL vto ti PHASE III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS EXiFBCOR A4.01 ALLAApXDk .. AQ IaJ c' AM mat nrenrt = tact maJ im UL.3iiEc,&lW-A -------------------------------------- ----- ---------------------------- I ------- I ----------- ----------------------------------------- --- • um� w FOBOItI W&WAMPL(M4 am 2�w �ml 4 1 ol 0=1 IL It'l, L 1m t ME Wk m�w-- wa "2 ntowu 1/8• =I'-O' NORTH ELEVATION —'t -_ . . . . . . . KEY -PLAN M SCHOOL OMCT OF PALUBEACHODUN7 M MK34-M F 1581]1318851 uiaRCr PGA 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33497 M 561 9884002 [F] 581988 ALLAMANM ElIkENTARY S MODERNIZATION ONISTMC" DOUNUM R" & RESUBMUTAL vto ti PHASE III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS EXiFBCOR A4.01 • • •I mw 4• FLJ>aS 11 I II I PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION ■ ■� WNW Mr.. N !03 101 w W ! , i Nil OWN NO OWN --- ------- ----- dtT: 1/8'=l'-O' ELEVATION SCHOOL THE SCHOOL DUM OF PAW BEACH OD" m(SiKum 19 (561K34-801 PGR 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33497 M 56199 4002 JIM 561988 3002 [o. Tw NiAW" EDOWARY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION MWTkCTK)N DOMtM PHASE & RESLUMAL �w_ I CKClQOn PHASE III CONSTRUCTION 'POCUMENTS _:­': :7- KEY PLAN A4.02 ■ Wom d, o 4 -loom n .-A 1. WNW I WINN V A ,—Mow&\ ■ ■� WNW Mr.. N !03 101 w W ! , i Nil OWN NO OWN --- ------- ----- dtT: 1/8'=l'-O' ELEVATION SCHOOL THE SCHOOL DUM OF PAW BEACH OD" m(SiKum 19 (561K34-801 PGR 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33497 M 56199 4002 JIM 561988 3002 [o. Tw NiAW" EDOWARY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION MWTkCTK)N DOMtM PHASE & RESLUMAL �w_ I CKClQOn PHASE III CONSTRUCTION 'POCUMENTS _:­': :7- KEY PLAN A4.02 ■ Wom z WNW I WINN ,—Mow&\ PARTIAL WEST ELEVATION ■ ■� WNW Mr.. N !03 101 w W ! , i Nil OWN NO OWN --- ------- ----- dtT: 1/8'=l'-O' ELEVATION SCHOOL THE SCHOOL DUM OF PAW BEACH OD" m(SiKum 19 (561K34-801 PGR 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33497 M 56199 4002 JIM 561988 3002 [o. Tw NiAW" EDOWARY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION MWTkCTK)N DOMtM PHASE & RESLUMAL �w_ I CKClQOn PHASE III CONSTRUCTION 'POCUMENTS _:­': :7- KEY PLAN A4.02 • i • . PARTIAL COURTYARD-SOUTH 1/8,1• -0• COURTYARD-SOUTH ELEVATION i.2, --mems, 1,27 4b inX I AU��r NV Is -4 1 a, WW7: 61111, , I PNK ............ 'mmme NEW LOW rt even wanness, mm"'s mnTvftm ►.amemes ART CLASSROOM WEST ELEVATION —'evvisai- owl mCIR 00"Mcnow. AMENT . we Names our�mm PARTIAL COURTYARD-SOUTH 1/8,1• -0• COURTYARD-SOUTH ELEVATION i.2, --mems, 1,27 4b inX I AU��r NV Is A 61111, ............ ART CLASSROOM WEST ELEVATION PARTIAL COURTYARD-SOUTH 1/8,1• -0• COURTYARD-SOUTH ELEVATION i.2, --mems, 1,27 4b ART PATIO NORTH ELEVATION�� � M SCHOOL WTRJL7 OF PALM BEADl COUNTY [T1 W)434M [19 (581)434-01 eeonen PGA 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOCA RATON. RLORVA 33487 M 561 988 4002 [9 56, 988 3002 _T_ ee06TMx AIL410" EIBENTARY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION CONSTM)CRA )OOUM3n ROSE Ilk RUSUBMTTAL 01014W IMOO Allarnanda Dr, Paim Beach Godens FIL 33410 rnaeert ovw eeww oeconn d 110 PHASE III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. EEVATKW KEY PLAN A4103 TN_T.5. inX I AU��r NV Is A 61111, ART CLASSROOM WEST ELEVATION ART PATIO NORTH ELEVATION�� � M SCHOOL WTRJL7 OF PALM BEADl COUNTY [T1 W)434M [19 (581)434-01 eeonen PGA 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOCA RATON. RLORVA 33487 M 561 988 4002 [9 56, 988 3002 _T_ ee06TMx AIL410" EIBENTARY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION CONSTM)CRA )OOUM3n ROSE Ilk RUSUBMTTAL 01014W IMOO Allarnanda Dr, Paim Beach Godens FIL 33410 rnaeert ovw eeww oeconn d 110 PHASE III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. EEVATKW KEY PLAN A4103 TN_T.5. inX I AU��r Is immix 61111, ART PATIO NORTH ELEVATION�� � M SCHOOL WTRJL7 OF PALM BEADl COUNTY [T1 W)434M [19 (581)434-01 eeonen PGA 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOCA RATON. RLORVA 33487 M 561 988 4002 [9 56, 988 3002 _T_ ee06TMx AIL410" EIBENTARY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION CONSTM)CRA )OOUM3n ROSE Ilk RUSUBMTTAL 01014W IMOO Allarnanda Dr, Paim Beach Godens FIL 33410 rnaeert ovw eeww oeconn d 110 PHASE III CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. EEVATKW KEY PLAN A4103 TN_T.5. E • ...:. t, L 'L PARTIAL COURTYARD-EAST ELEVATION ala► LL-11 ZM 0 COURTYARD-EAST ELEVATION cams —w- �_"Ms at Ww"Lm ELEC/MECH KITCHEN WEST ELEVATION 5 REGIIIIECH KITCHEN SOUTH ELEVATION RE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY IT] (5610M IF] (561p441 PGR 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOG RATON. FLORIDA 33487 [TI 561 988 40M In 561 988 3002 ALAMANDA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE 1114 REsuaMnAL 010141227 im mward, Dr, Palm Boodi Godra 8.33410 oum ano fv 7_7 PHASE III CONSTRUCTION 77- 1- 7j POCUMENTS 7. ExTEAwoR KEY PLAN nJ.T.s� A4,04 ■ ad ER] . . . ...... Fm Im t aJmr.Axaa Mir uxamm am PARTIAL COURTYARD-EAST ELEVATION ala► LL-11 ZM 0 COURTYARD-EAST ELEVATION cams —w- �_"Ms at Ww"Lm ELEC/MECH KITCHEN WEST ELEVATION 5 REGIIIIECH KITCHEN SOUTH ELEVATION RE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY IT] (5610M IF] (561p441 PGR 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOG RATON. FLORIDA 33487 [TI 561 988 40M In 561 988 3002 ALAMANDA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE 1114 REsuaMnAL 010141227 im mward, Dr, Palm Boodi Godra 8.33410 oum ano fv 7_7 PHASE III CONSTRUCTION 77- 1- 7j POCUMENTS 7. ExTEAwoR KEY PLAN nJ.T.s� A4,04 ■ 0 • . ON' Nm ------- 07 W -------------- PARTIAL SOUTH ELEVATION 91 B --- - - ------------------------ -T-v r I rl KUL,] PARTIAL SOUTH ELEVATION 4ZIIN SOUTH ELEVATION (SHADES SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY) Is .a ryyd roneiwa,l�lrmrJ wax dlmd COVER PLAY AREA NORTH ELEVATION 9 onal msDc0LDISTRICT OF PALM BEACH ODUNTY M (56IK34-M [F] (561041651 PGAt 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33487 M 561988 4002 [F] 561988 3002 Ma I- ALLAMANDA ELEMENTARY SDM MODERNIZATION aMlRUCnON DOD-WENTS PMK I& RESUBMTfAL 010141w 100 ABari=da Dr, P*n Buch Gardens FL33410 a w� mw wma = Ms PHASE III WMTRUCTION BMTKM KEY PLAN A4.05 Al Mom mm COVER PLAY AREA WEST ELEVATION Is .a ryyd roneiwa,l�lrmrJ wax dlmd COVER PLAY AREA NORTH ELEVATION 9 onal msDc0LDISTRICT OF PALM BEACH ODUNTY M (56IK34-M [F] (561041651 PGAt 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33487 M 561988 4002 [F] 561988 3002 Ma I- ALLAMANDA ELEMENTARY SDM MODERNIZATION aMlRUCnON DOD-WENTS PMK I& RESUBMTfAL 010141w 100 ABari=da Dr, P*n Buch Gardens FL33410 a w� mw wma = Ms PHASE III WMTRUCTION BMTKM KEY PLAN A4.05 • 0 • T.4 rMd ttt EAST ELEVATION .4 .1. Vollrolmmo(oll Wool 1 CM02 mmllmom-31! I alLTytAlO Oa� law -------------------- PMLJW�. - a tad W4W - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------- Z, ------------ ---- mat 4 -nom) 7 —7 — a w riuk A I-- • ---------- ---- -------- - I A.. PARTIAL EAST ELEVATION PARTIAL EAST ELEVATION T.4 rMd ttt EAST ELEVATION .4 .1. Vollrolmmo(oll Wool 1 CM02 mmllmom-31! I alLTytAlO Oa� law -------------------- PMLJW�. - - - - - - - - W4W - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------- Z, ------------ ---- mat 4 -nom) a w riuk A I-- • - I A.. PARTIAL EAST ELEVATION T-L T.4 rMd ttt EAST ELEVATION .4 .1. Vollrolmmo(oll Wool 1 CM02 mmllmom-31! I alLTytAlO Ala ril I IA er_� Oa� law -------------------- PMLJW�. - - - - - - - - W4W - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------- ------------ ---- mat 4 -nom) a w riuk A I-- • - I A.. T-L IE TRUE COURTYARD SOUTH ELEVATION (BUILDING 2) Ala ril I IA er_� CA - -W- )) THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BWH COUNTY Ill 1561KVAM IF] MI 34 -8651 ?GAL 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOCA RATON. FLOWA 33487 IT] 56 988 4002 IF] 56� 988 3002 ALAUMM ELEMENTARY SCIVOI.IWICIDEWATION aXISICTION DOCUMENTS PHASE & RESUBMrFTAL R 3311 no wt ov6v tatfon ... I., small ZR. `-- m- PHASE III CONSTRUCTION 7- 0I)CUMEM e2wmw AL A4.06 Oa� law PMLJW�. mat -nom) I-- • - IE TRUE COURTYARD SOUTH ELEVATION (BUILDING 2) CA - -W- )) THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BWH COUNTY Ill 1561KVAM IF] MI 34 -8651 ?GAL 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOCA RATON. FLOWA 33487 IT] 56 988 4002 IF] 56� 988 3002 ALAUMM ELEMENTARY SCIVOI.IWICIDEWATION aXISICTION DOCUMENTS PHASE & RESUBMrFTAL R 3311 no wt ov6v tatfon ... I., small ZR. `-- m- PHASE III CONSTRUCTION 7- 0I)CUMEM e2wmw AL A4.06 • 'r-] NIL, r�scxoa. � Y A THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUM M (561)4348228 (FI (561)4348651 ?GALAMaCf 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SURE 400 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33467 M 561 SIR 4002 19 56, 986 30M m.ATAiT &LAMANDA ELEI MMY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION OMSTRIC'10 DOCIJE TS PHASE III• RESUWIRAL r1166 �I11 91�am 10300 Atlamsda DI, Pakn Bead) Godeu R 33410 —40aac 062107 aro aeaeon TT ¢rYe� 9B rYLLAl16 TO rAIe ham YRl® � " "� fret ROC,1 MrrP'® �iff y,ara� s-tma• uA.,vety �- etvaaaiao �iOEt �wf c am + PHASE III _ rrr rp CONSTRUCTION h--� --_ DOCUMENTS tr^, f �i .6 ;t�1i� es,tme : I .� EIENAl10N5 KEY PLAN A4r07 N.T.B. 94 e1COlY A a A El,ad ala JOILemn A Jmr a+sr aJr s� JN>< ev saJlr C � -♦ Noa- nT V nea T¢rwe AC A, >A oa N VIwt / A®Il Yfel®OI GI0IQlH A,A mlf.,eTw y ,A'.. C S m T ¢ rA,e Ei�aa• Ei11fl - Ijegf. / IrABLII - 01i - 1R6RYFALIIRJ nM1YfORw111VrJ T.O rAIB mnn.- �� - V �1 rearaml aaaaawa p4,, .� nlaeamrr ;6.. IIOIEBM/ItW FA,reFUTaluta Fm aneiww PE9Jei T-- IEVwl1U pN119RaLJ n.OrDIMwQ ®� IA1 I,ArEYEA4pOl,f Mmf "� •i� ` Moll - �� ±f-c— Torue� ma, � '`E TRUE EAST ELEVATION (BUILDING 3) TIV ELttTS 6 PARTIAL COURTYARD WEST ELEVATION 3 O IL I ,era- vs- -,•-a- ® ® mw+ twJr alit mat �f aatr tr! S1Y ar 4! aaJr T.¢IEC9E 1lTAL sMaf,0 �- arneeeEp,ra erudle�- � — sesmfmmnen micerr ._- - - - - • - ` — femreae - - - - allerlearat0lr _ - _ , sfnee1dL11aJ IESrrrwO¢. J1r6JOf AtpfgnewA®ff a ®a nrarlwa mrtleu —, w>aaa+Eeo - Je•nea a.) caws wai Ln rAte - - - - -- -- - ----- - riY,rr � A - AYm•1� hT.O a� firms J T. O. AR __ - -_- -- - -__ -- - -- - -mMt� y .�_!a?r Rna ma' oIEaAE _ �.'. i' mini ♦ �' u mat n _ + mat � werr�oan war rt¢ow 0� •. - IT- ma+ !' � ma a mr ��' eeeit _. '- a.Yma• �� nlex NIIr/J! pfrrrtmmf �naaal„o�fn ufvralu - loalrmtf� hweAleiaerAn Ifal slanl,leooat m fID TRUE EAST ELEVATION (BUILDING 3) afneee�Cflrq x TRUE COURTYARD SOUTH ELEVATION (BUILDING 4) 4 A aJlf M ittir agar N mar .l a T¢rve rooeiuwmrtfmum fw,iri�a mR,ev♦ ATVIwH AtOIeLYIrraA®ilfe,eJW aair r� FET- Eittfr - - __ - - - -- - - -_ -- - wee T Ind,;, ar¢a,ull,rl ------ - -__ -- T¢rAre , ,a_i e'�, ._ ♦, . fmaa ,� T. o. rave -.�.- �� "�' .'` EoweO+rF - . ,.= _ .;,,,, � :.- - I � .•. nao.,.,w®. Reae �- nT - attv C --- - - - - -_ - a1F8 HIVE mllt� - - - -_- rl -t1TS O ! -7= A n ¢rAle A � Tq QrN6 ♦ - 11 E n � -.: .., ..j .�. =C�q'L _ � I �n t - -ant- 4iloa <r_ • r ..!< � a�trs n.Y,ra• 4 fgA,j�.p. ' — - - rA - '� 'T�]� .F TT I ' i mOli i I 1 1 �t �� XT r ,_�a�, Lam. i�J i-J L4� .. ... _ ®1 Cam- ' nwmim~ °,u wa Lim T� C� acs a emt - ®� �aP ._® ^e" �� - S.l a£snw� •� O +� mfllE. I e�nalmum , d mS wmr 0 i � canwAlo ELEVATION mat y u I A en twoOw } mal mat mal - __ 4• N, r _ 7 T.O 0 1 r�scxoa. � Y A THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUM M (561)4348228 (FI (561)4348651 ?GALAMaCf 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SURE 400 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33467 M 561 SIR 4002 19 56, 986 30M m.ATAiT &LAMANDA ELEI MMY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION OMSTRIC'10 DOCIJE TS PHASE III• RESUWIRAL r1166 �I11 91�am 10300 Atlamsda DI, Pakn Bead) Godeu R 33410 —40aac 062107 aro aeaeon TT ¢rYe� 9B rYLLAl16 TO rAIe ham YRl® � " "� fret ROC,1 MrrP'® �iff y,ara� s-tma• uA.,vety �- etvaaaiao �iOEt �wf c am + PHASE III _ rrr rp CONSTRUCTION h--� --_ DOCUMENTS tr^, f �i .6 ;t�1i� es,tme : I .� EIENAl10N5 KEY PLAN A4r07 N.T.B. 94 e1COlY A a A ala C A A C A C � -♦ ELtm -1P AC y ,A'.. C S m - •:.' .,}; Ijegf. ` _:. ....._ 4rWei; ._,.- mnn.- �� - V rearaml aaaaawa p4,, .� ••. h ;6.. IIOIEBM/ItW FA,reFUTaluta Fm aneiww PE9Jei T-- IEVwl1U pN119RaLJ n.OrDIMwQ ®� IA1 I,ArEYEA4pOl,f Mmf "� •i� ` Moll •� � � Ma+6,InMA�Ir � '`E TRUE EAST ELEVATION (BUILDING 3) TIV 6 PARTIAL COURTYARD WEST ELEVATION 3 IL I ,era- vs- -,•-a- COURTYARD WEST ELEVATION a a twJr alit .. �f aatr tr! S1Y ar 4! aaJr awaf an,r.leia� w aaJr �- arneeeEp,ra — nTUersw mfummar¢wo.wlr — sesmfmmnen micerr ._- - - - - JrnenFnprrJ - - - - - ` — femreae - - - - allerlearat0lr _ - _ , sfnee1dL11aJ IESrrrwO¢. J1r6JOf AtpfgnewA®ff a ®a nrarlwa mrtleu —, w>aaa+Eeo - Je•nea a.) caws wai Ln rAte - - - - -- -- - ----- - riY,rr � / f /• __ - -_- -- - -__ -- - -- - -mMt� y u ` �' u mat T ¢ ,trA� sworn + ♦iea :. - :�- mat a IT- ma+ !' ma, a ��' eeeit - y J � �� B:t•Me9 m fID afneee�Cflrq x A Com FET- T Ind,;, :._:. ._ ♦, . fmaa I,.. -.�.- �� "�' .'` �4aai - . ,.= _ .;,,,, � :.- - I � .•. nao.,.,w®. Reae �- nT V PwHa � C NeilE A H.'t�d a1F8 HIVE mllt� C Irml wn> ® -lelel . ..ea..r O ! A n A ♦ d 11 E -.: .., ..j .�. =C�q'L _ � I �n t - -ant- 4iloa <r_ • r ..!< {rR 1I-,-11 W fgA,j�.p. '� •• - - rA - '� 'T�]� .F TT I ' i mOli i I 1 1 �t �� XT r ,_�a�, Lam. i�J i-J L4� .. ... _ ®1 Cam- ' nwmim~ °,u wa Lim T� C� acs a emt - ®� �aP ._® ^e" �� - S.l a£snw� •� mqi u rel�aiEaalu� +� mfllE. I e�nalmum , d mS wmr i PARTIAL COURTYARD WEST ELEVATION I r�scxoa. � Y A THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUM M (561)4348228 (FI (561)4348651 ?GALAMaCf 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SURE 400 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33467 M 561 SIR 4002 19 56, 986 30M m.ATAiT &LAMANDA ELEI MMY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION OMSTRIC'10 DOCIJE TS PHASE III• RESUWIRAL r1166 �I11 91�am 10300 Atlamsda DI, Pakn Bead) Godeu R 33410 —40aac 062107 aro aeaeon TT ¢rYe� 9B rYLLAl16 TO rAIe ham YRl® � " "� fret ROC,1 MrrP'® �iff y,ara� s-tma• uA.,vety �- etvaaaiao �iOEt �wf c am + PHASE III _ rrr rp CONSTRUCTION h--� --_ DOCUMENTS tr^, f �i .6 ;t�1i� es,tme : I .� EIENAl10N5 KEY PLAN A4r07 N.T.B. .1j► ala V ELY1fS TIV IL I COURTYARD WEST ELEVATION twJr alit .. �f aatr tr! S1Y ar 4! �A0211 TY rME a TfmAlmmnreao �- arneeeEp,ra �.sln�a — sesmfmmnen micerr ._- �rem ,- eflp♦�e[ - ----- - -- -- -- _ - _ - - - - _ _ _ - - - - � m� Atbllel,giA®II - _ _ _ ' - - - - - - - _ - riY,rr � / f u mat T ¢ ,trA� sworn fwlnnan ,.ma= � Ind,;, :._:. ._ ♦, . fmaa I,.. -.�.- �� "�' .'` �4aai - . ,.= _ .;,,,, � :.- - I n,a,,,,>ot nao.,.,w®. Reae �- nT V PwHa � UE61t RA � � NeilE Al,em6 ®a,lme- H.'t�d a1F8 HIVE mllt� Irml wn> ® -lelel . ..ea..r TRUE COURTYARD WEST ELEVATION r�scxoa. � Y A THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUM M (561)4348228 (FI (561)4348651 ?GALAMaCf 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SURE 400 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33467 M 561 SIR 4002 19 56, 986 30M m.ATAiT &LAMANDA ELEI MMY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION OMSTRIC'10 DOCIJE TS PHASE III• RESUWIRAL r1166 �I11 91�am 10300 Atlamsda DI, Pakn Bead) Godeu R 33410 —40aac 062107 aro aeaeon TT ¢rYe� 9B rYLLAl16 TO rAIe ham YRl® � " "� fret ROC,1 MrrP'® �iff y,ara� s-tma• uA.,vety �- etvaaaiao �iOEt �wf c am + PHASE III _ rrr rp CONSTRUCTION h--� --_ DOCUMENTS tr^, f �i .6 ;t�1i� es,tme : I .� EIENAl10N5 KEY PLAN A4r07 N.T.B. • 0 a ADMIN & COURTYARD MEDIA CENTER - WEST ELEVATION a+r err f —W meat m2ta1 —T. T.Qa ALIM am aOialp - - - - - - - - - - ---------- arm SXW� _._jmj --.Wm XT—W T­� CLASSROOM BUILDING WEST SOUTH CORNER TRUE ELEVATION ........... OR- ADMIN - TRUE NORTH ELEVATION tapomms 4 -m-w 4(01 F 7LT=w —vw, �m.m MMUN mwv MM7 _m W� Ira 1 uwlEmm. WCOMMO COURTYARD NORTH ELEVATION ADMIN -TRUE WEST ELEVATION 3 T_ MW IMM S M 7�f -tMM alm p IERin _m am. IK PARTIAL ADMIN & COURTYARD MEDIA CENTER - WEST ELEVATION -- ------------ ------------------ — ------- — -------------------------------------------------------- ol� L Ml 7 7i'd 44=1 LLU ADMIN & COURTYARD MEDIA CENTER - WEST ELEVATION a+r err meat m2ta1 —T. T.Qa ALIM aOialp _._jmj --.Wm CLASSROOM BUILDING WEST SOUTH CORNER TRUE ELEVATION ThE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUM M (XlAu4m IF] polp-ml PGlt 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOCA RATON• FLORIDA 33487 M 561 9881002 56, 988 3002 kiAMANDA IRDENTARY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION PHASE 0311STRUICTON DODAOM & RESUBMrrTAL 01014m 103M Akmw4i Or, Palm Best Gmam FL 33410 _.WW ovw Hamel rlaam mamma . 77 PHASE HI CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ERATIONS LAN 1 A4.08 —T. aOialp ........... OR- ADMIN - TRUE NORTH ELEVATION ThE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUM M (XlAu4m IF] polp-ml PGlt 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOCA RATON• FLORIDA 33487 M 561 9881002 56, 988 3002 kiAMANDA IRDENTARY SCHOOL MODERNIZATION PHASE 0311STRUICTON DODAOM & RESUBMrrTAL 01014m 103M Akmw4i Or, Palm Best Gmam FL 33410 _.WW ovw Hamel rlaam mamma . 77 PHASE HI CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS ERATIONS LAN 1 A4.08 0. E ;21 A Rd en wa°w TRUE SOUTH ELEVATION a-- r,4 % . —W...0— T miii7.7- — "A PARTIAL COURTYARD & MEDIA CENTER - EAST ELEVA / w / �- mmm� m-�m- w NUNN ow 0 WE EA, l I =Wftu 1/8-11-(r T Lk- Qr—CH THESOMDETW OF PALM BM COUNTY M (MY,14= ?GIL 791 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD. SUITE 400 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33487 M 561 9884002 19 56, 988 3002 COVITeeI ALLWANDA aBJENTARY 90100. MODERNIZATION CDERX71ON DOCUMBn PHASE Ilk RESUBMfFTAL olm4wwees 1 AbTarda Dr., Pmh Beach Gardene FL 334 10 emcee COURTYARD & MEDIA CENTER - EAST ELEVATION Jaw mr, T. PHASE III CONSTRUCTION 0 A- W-7 --------- --- DOCUMENTS • WERIOR Have aEVATUa TRUE PLAYGROUND EAST ELEVATION (BUILDING 2) TRUE SOUTH ELEVATION (BUILDING 3) F,--, - —.- —(�) KEY PLAN N.T.S. A4.09 • r • PROPOSED RENDERING OF FRONT ELEVATION (MAIN ENTRY) N.T., 1ML06 11O PHASE 11 CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS