The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda P&Z 072407-i,t, Y Of f a� L� ,� ^ r im tlBBtlrI e JUCy 24, 2007 Rando ph Hansen Dennis SoComon Craig XunkCe N ichaeCPanczak DougCas PenneCC Barry Present Jonathan D. Rubins Joy Hecht 0" Aft.) Amir XaneC(z "' Aft.) IL F_ -I L-A MEMORANDUM DATE: July 24, 2007 TO: Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board Members FROM: Growth Management Department SUBJECT: Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board Meeting Tuesday, July 24, 2007 - 6:30 P.M. Enclosed is the agenda containing the items to be presented on Tuesday, July 24, 2007. This meeting will be held in the Council Chambers, Palm Beach Gardens Municipal Building, 10500 North Military Trail, beginning at 6:30 p.m. Enclosed with this memorandum are the following items: • 1. An agenda for the meeting; and 2. A compact disc containing PowerPoint presentations 3. A Growth Management Department staff report for the items to be heard. As always, the respective Project Managers' telephone numbers and e -mail addresses have been provided in case you have any questions or require additional information on any petition. This will help us offer better staff support in the review of these applications. Nina Sorenson, Administrative Specialist II, will call to confirm your attendance. 4,-,P , Kara L. Irwin, AICP Growth Management Administrator • 11LL IVV.VVJ V(IIJ V( VV -.)L 1L•VI \VHI'J LLJ1laIL JIVL)1U FHA -VV1 JVV 1111 rHUt 1/ 1 0 July 19, 2007 Ms. Kara Irwin, AICP Growth Management Director Growth Management Department City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military 'Frail Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 •t Urban Design Urban Planning Land Planning Landscape Architecture RE: REQUEST TO WITHDRAWAL PETITION MISC -07 -02- 000024 - PGA COMMONS PARCEL. 1 PUD OUTDOOR SEATING REQUEST Dear Ms. Irwin, As we discussed yesterday, please accept this letter as otrrrequest to withdrawal our Miscellaneous application (Petition ## MISC- 07 -02- 000024) for the PGA Commons Parcel I Planned Unit Development. With this letter, we are withdrawing our request to eliminate Condition of approval #30 of Ordinance 7, 1999. Thank you for your assistance in this matter and with the overall PGA Commons project. Should • you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely, Urban Design Studio Marty R.A. Minor, AICP Senior Project Plan= c: Joel Channing .Ton Chaining Todd Miller, AICP 477 S. Rosemary Avenue Suite 225 - The Lofts at City Place r West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 561.366.1111 fax www.UDSonfine.com LCC36 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD • Agenda Cover Memorandum Date Prepared: July 13, 2007 Meeting Date: July 24, 2007 Petition # MISC- 07 -03- 000026 • SUBJECT /AGENDA ITEM MISC 07 -03 -000026: PGA Commons: Miscellaneous request for light -pole mounted banners Recommendation to City Council: A request from Marty Minor of Urban Design Studio, as agent for Joel Channing, Trustee of the PGA Commons Land Trust, for approval to install pole mounted banners throughout the PGA Commons PUD. [X] Recommendation to APPROVE with conditions of approval. [ ] Recommendation to DENY Originating Dept.: [X] Quasi — Judicial FINANCE: N/A PZAB Action: Growth Management: [ ] Legislative Finance Accountant [ ] Approved Principal Planner: [ ] Public Hearing N/A [ J App. w/ conditions Ketty LaBossiere [ ] Denied Costs: $ N/A [ ] Rec. approval Todd iller, AICP Total [ ] Rec. app. w/ conds. [ ] Rec. Denial Reviewed by: Advertised: [ ] Notified $ N/A [ ] Continued to: Development Compliance: [X] Not Required Current FY Affected Parties: Attachments: [ )Notified Funding Source: 1. Project Narrative and Ba areh Keshavarz- Application Wolfs, [X] Not Required 2. Typical banner AICP [ ] Operating photographs Growth Management [X] Other NA 3. Site plans indicating Admi strator: Budget Acct. #: banner locations N/A Kara Irwin, AICP City Attorney: Christine Tatum Approved By: Ronald M. Ferris City Manager Date Prepared: June 21, 2007 Meeting Date: July 24, 2007 MISC 07 -03 -000026 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The mixed use project PGA Commons Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved in 1999, via Ordinances 7, 8, and 9, 1999. Currently, the owner is seeking to provide a distinct branding for the project in order to unify the PGA Commons theme and identity along PGA Boulevard. In order to accomplish this, the owner is proposing to provide banners on the existing pedestrian scale light poles throughout the developments. However, Section 78- 284(h)(2) of the City Code requires City Council approval for pole mounted banners. Therefore, the applicant has requested approval for the installation of the banners. BACKGROUND The PGA Commons Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved in 1999, via Ordinances 7, 8, and 9, 1999. In order to provide a distinct branding and identity for the mixed use development, the applicant is proposing to provide banners on the existing pedestrian scale light poles throughout the development. In all, there is a total of 72 pedestrian scale light poles, to which the proposed banners could be attached. The banners are brown in color, are 2' x 7' in size, and have a geometrical representation of a butterfly and the name of the Commons phase (i.e. PGA Commons West). The poles themselves are dark green in color, and are 16 feet high. (See Attachments 2 and 3) Staff is concerned, however, with the commercial signage nature of the banners, and the sheer number of banner proposed. While the proposed banners will provide the branding the applicant is seeking, branding is a form of advertising. The addition of the name of the Parcel to the banners clearly qualifies the banner as signage per the definition of a sign described in Section 78 -751 of the City's LDRs, and is not consistent with the intent of the PGA Boulevard Overlay special setback area •to ensure new and redevelopment projects enhance the visual character of the corridor. In addition, the provision of 39 + signs within the special setback will create visual clutter. Specifically, Section 78-221 of the City Code requires new and redevelopment projects to "preserve and enhance the existing visual character of the corridor", and prohibit such elements as objects which "are frivolous, distracting, or not in harmony with the overlay landscape and design goals." The only other location where banners have been provided on light poles within the City is in the plaza at the City Hall Municipal Complex. However, the banners are not visible from the adjacent rights -of- way, and are forms of public art. The banners are provided to showcase artistic talent of local high school students, and to highlight the City's Art in Public Places program. In keeping with the banners provided at City Hall, and to preserve the visual character within the 55' special setback area, staff recommends a condition of approval that no banners be permitted within the 55 -foot special setback area. LAND USE AND ZONING The property has a Mixed -Use (MXD) land use designation, and has a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MXD, PUD) zoning classification. DRC REVIEW Staff has distributed the application to the applicable DRC committee members, and has not received any adverse comments. FA Date Prepared: June 21, 2007 Meeting Date: July 24, 2007 MISC 07-03 -000026 STAFF RECOMMENDATION • Staff recommends APPROVAL of Petition MISC 07 -03- 000026, subject to the following condition. Planning and Zoning 1. ^ No banners shall be permitted on light poles within the 55 -foot special setback area. • • • March 9, 2007 Mr. Richard Marrero Planner Growth Management Department City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 A11-ACHMENT 1 Ak -oil Urban Design Urban Planning Land Planning Landscape Architecture RE: MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENT TO ALLOW BANNERS WITHIN PGA COMMONS PARCELS 1, 2 AND 3 Dear Richard: Please accept this Miscellaneous amendment request to allow for banners within the common areas of PGA Commons Parcels 1, 2 and 3. This is a request to provide quality, decorative banners within the plaza and parking areas of PGA Commons. Section 78- 284 of the City's Land Development requires City Council • approval for the placement of banners within the City. The banners will be attached to the decorative light poles within the project. Banners have been used throughout successful communities as a means of creating an attractive and unifying connection and identification for districts and neighborhoods. Such banners have been used through district and neighborhoods in Palm Beach County and are now currently being used within the Palm Beach Gardens Municipal Complex. The banners requested will help identify the PGA Commons mixed use districts in an attractive and pleasing manner. Banners generate pedestrian activity and community identity and are recommended by the National Main Street program. We believe the use of banners will enhance the atmosphere at PGA Commons and, therefore, the community as a whole. Attached for your review are the following documents: • Application Fee of $1,500.00 477 S. Rosemary Avenue • • Development Application Suite 225 - The Lofts at City Place West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561.366.1100 561.366.1111 fax www.UDSonline.com LCC35 • Color photo illustration of example banner • Should you have any comments or questions, please feel free to contact me at any time. Sincerely, Urban Design Studio Marty R.A. Minor, AICP Senior Project Manager c: Jon Channing Joel Channing • • .7 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Planning and Zoning Division Growth Management Department 10500 N. Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 (561) 799 -4243 FAX (561) 799 -4281 Request ❑ Planned Community District (PCD) ❑ Annexation • Planned Unit Development (PUD) ❑ Rezoning • Amendment to PCD, PUD or Site Plan ❑ Site Plan Review • Conditional Use ❑Concurrency Certificate ❑ Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan ❑Time Extension ® Miscellaneous ❑Administrative Approval ❑ Other (Explain) Date: March 9, 2007 Project Name: PGA Commons Parcel 1 - Banners with the Plaza Owner: Joel Channing, Trustee of the PGA Commons Land Trust, Applicant (if not Owner): Applicant's Add: 5520 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200, PBG, FL Tel. No. 561- 630 -8630 Agent: Urban Design Studio Contact Person: Marty Minor Email: mminor Qudsonline.com Agent's Mailing Address: 477 So. Rosemary Avenue, Ste. 225, West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Agent's Telephone Number: 561- 366 -1100 Fax Number: 561- 366 -1111 Petition Number: Fees Received Application $ FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date & Time Received: Engineering $ • II I� identification for districts and neighborhoods. Such banners have been used through district and neighborhoods in Palm Beach County and are now currently eing used within the2laza of the • Palm Beach Gardens Municipal Complex. The banners requested will help identify the PGA Commons mixed use districts in an attractive and pleasing, manner. Banners have been used to generate erate pedestrian activity and community identity and are recommended by the National Main Street program. 2. What will be the impact of the proposed change on the surrounding area? There is no impact on the surrounding, area. 3. Describe how the rezoning request complies with the City's Vision Plan and the following elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan — Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Infrastructure, Coastal Management, Conservation, Recreation and Open space, Intergovernmental Coordination and Capital Improvement. This is not a rezoning request and therefore is not applicable. • 4. How does the proposed project comply with City requirements for preservation of Natural resources and native vegetation (Chapter 78 -261, Land Development Regulations)? Not applicable with this request. 5. How will the proposed project comply with City requirements for Art in Public Places (Chapter 78 -261, Land Development Regulations.)? Not Applicable 6. Concurrency Certification? Not Applicable Date Received: Not Applicable • i I = ' I F , 0 0 0 , *qb , r 4 • 0 • • '— 7�. < D v y C r ra '7 = i o T 0 0 r �� a GG {ggg -t D T = »� ■. ' LvM Fevlsions: D 1 Z 41i iI Z � u F , qtr: • s 10 > A � gg n D r z I Z -, r E J. O n O I , a 0 G i i i t I I j � I < CD� - - -� i i D _ 1 CD - i- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - -\- # w o rn II o m 0 0 N • r 07'x% U r 5' ao r A d o' g w � y C r ra '7 = i o T 0 0 r �� a GG {ggg -t D T = O Fevlsions: 1 O ■ rz 0 > drawn by checked by: s 10 > A X n r z l Z -, r z .P J. O n O a r S r D -4 I, ` zz XX Qt = = � gezo> ir Z (n n i 0 v i —o O A c ®��q (F I �< � �,� � ° 13 6 8E r y Z a Z < 4 �c � < r o o Z 7 ?zz :4- O s oo ii O i r no. _ o n cv > n n i0nj > p n a 7 C> II I�IW,•1 i c I� oil r Iz �■ � - i Ir A ' !t'��I��ii � f' r 07'x% U r 5' ao r A d o' g OLIVER • GLIDDEN & PARTNERS A F 1 11 1 1 V I f I: H I: I y T F R I 0 R O F S I (i N • 1.01 FORUM WAY. SUrTF100 WEST PALM BhA(11. FLORIDA 37401 561 M4"441 FAX 5A1L114 "l • E -MAIL' •pplhMl�ilPOl.mm w � y C r ra '7 = i o T 0 0 r �� a GG {ggg -t D T = O Fevlsions: 1 O ■ rz 0 > drawn by checked by: s 10 > A X n r z l Z -, r z .P J. O n O a r S r D -4 n s + cc ` zz XX Qt = = � gezo> ir Z (n n i 0 v i —o O A c ®��q (F I �< � �,� � ° 13 6 8E r y Z a Z < 4 �c � < r o o Z 7 ?zz :4- O s oo ii O i r no. _ o n cv > n n i0nj > p n a 7 C> OZr O j r Iz 0a0 Q 8.� • N®' 4 ► X Q n n Z > a I's n ad A � a n n vo n a A o K �n D -•� E F a■ : . SH A r A C O Z F [Y i r'4 8 {0 C 3 p E 2�S Z -4 -O •� N n 7 a D g lit o th (>O a , 01 0 o X• ' D r y T O Wp > > r V V jT A N a P N aT T G 1° � O N V a a T x x OLIVER • GLIDDEN & PARTNERS A F 1 11 1 1 V I f I: H I: I y T F R I 0 R O F S I (i N • 1.01 FORUM WAY. SUrTF100 WEST PALM BhA(11. FLORIDA 37401 561 M4"441 FAX 5A1L114 "l • E -MAIL' •pplhMl�ilPOl.mm Si hee t title: fie Ee ' 't ES #��n��q name: �� a GG {ggg Project no date: Fevlsions: �+y drawn by checked by: _gRYb�x OLIVER • GLIDDEN & PARTNERS A F 1 11 1 1 V I f I: H I: I y T F R I 0 R O F S I (i N • 1.01 FORUM WAY. SUrTF100 WEST PALM BhA(11. FLORIDA 37401 561 M4"441 FAX 5A1L114 "l • E -MAIL' •pplhMl�ilPOl.mm J 9 9 0 fill y z 6� D { N C I� I ` �OPtb'26Z ID) YD,�sT'Yll (Yl 1 1 1 / ,I r J s8 t II el 1 8 � I Y t a a v 1 9 r I 1 1 , I / I Y,,,III�� ••rr¢y YA 3 n lam INS. Li 11 I � I I-0 Cn 1 � • Inv � N I a H O r 7=7 -> 4 D >. vi M 0 M I D Lo N! pi I I . II lu I I� Ile`; I s I �I L . y lit N I ai Ls - 1 a a� IF • O N - I I I'T �\li, 1 vo m �i 1 I I I I I I I j l r f I � 1 � I I I v I I'E I 3_ £ .I I I Iltll g< I I I I I � ill I 1 •IIID� -I I CD k fa G' I I < '�� a .tea g• II 2 M 1Cd � I I I CD a L N0171�TY[ � 12T.T6� R9t71m1 I Hal 1,1 I C i _L Iirmp )l ppq 1z 0 project no: 89017 date: 06/,5/98 revisions: 06/07/01 2/16 0 r D p Z M pZ Z <z Z N A S Z I f QXA91x 1p1S1 cc Mir OA)y Oyrr °i�lyC 1 > checked by: J $$ �; < w r f'1 p C A A ppmt OA Om > @ A Z dg dm d I Q IT p a A ' s? P � O C W " < I 0Iz w w m 10 N! pi I I . II lu I I� Ile`; I s I �I L . y lit N I ai Ls - 1 a a� IF • O N - I I I'T �\li, 1 vo m �i 1 I I I I I I I j l r f I � 1 � I I I v I I'E I 3_ £ .I I I Iltll g< I I I I I � ill I 1 •IIID� -I I CD k fa G' I I < '�� a .tea g• II 2 M 1Cd � I I I CD a L N0171�TY[ � 12T.T6� R9t71m1 I Hal 1,1 I C i _L Iirmp )l ppq 1z 0 project no: 89017 date: 06/,5/98 revisions: 06/07/01 2/16 0 r D p Z M pZ Z <z Z N A S Z I f QXA91x 1p1S1 cc Mir OA)y Oyrr °i�lyC 1 > checked by: J alm N < w r f'1 p C A A ppmt OA Om Ci m Lrn� Z dg dm d I o IT p o ' s? P � O C W " < w w m f71 {Z L S— L c ; �s ol — - - -- a r > Q c y :O p > c I�i 2 p o �H 0 D 1 �O, T > ti 0 In M r D A o > > m l D s N A m rrI Z4 C) � N m� r N al r�f� •u�l� I I lit m ♦N f/1 r T T aD u. 1 >< K I CD sheet title: PARCEL 2 SITE PLAN filename: TC-SP3"20101.DWG �eIMI' 3 �€ All deb: t A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT P.G.A. COMMON S project no: 89017 date: 06/,5/98 revisions: 06/07/01 2/16 0 drawn by: a1JDS �t ;2 -,rob O o oox O N om � O O � QXA91x PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA checked by: J alm N < w ICS � � ; �mN�cT A � �f A � m � m � � pZp A �O � � 2 m A �- e � N 0 8 z AD 1 ty LfONOO 0 N i]r � V < Q ${ f.r N O qq `� 2G 1� pNOfwl T T 1R 1 1 — — -- 1.1 1 OLIVER' GLIDDEN & PARTNERS A R C H I V E C T U R E I N T E R I O R U E S 1 0 N ■ IQ1 FORUM WAY. SUITE Im • WEST PALM UGCK MIA)DA 7JWI 561.br1ib�1 F AX''61-bF4Ap90 . F. -MAR: oof i(owW H 1 ~~ � 1 � ��ZO � � y yy nn O o oox O O o om � O O � � c cc � a alm N N � C n Lrn� — — -- 1.1 1 OLIVER' GLIDDEN & PARTNERS A R C H I V E C T U R E I N T E R I O R U E S 1 0 N ■ IQ1 FORUM WAY. SUITE Im • WEST PALM UGCK MIA)DA 7JWI 561.br1ib�1 F AX''61-bF4Ap90 . F. -MAR: oof i(owW 0 0 0 J Sheet title: PARCEL 3 SITE PLAN filename: TC•SP23.DWt3(SP &80A) q j gjRxR �v ° F a$ v lx!x A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT P.G.A. COMMONS PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL ORIDA no: 98017 date: 06/15/98 drawn d checked rwimons: 06 /07/01 DS �: . ,p• ao-� — oe 1,i16 s-1106 'z I �y _D N g I T , I— 1 Z ® ■ D r T I Ali m 4 CC \ T1 W W 2q€ I a II ' U I _ "/ sl r � 1 r... — --- -- - - -- I 1 , a 0 • ICI II "A �I 1 n i i � b D BI A." ju 17. go I III ' I I I � III l 1 1 li i i I I U r q�. i G7 D CD O C m 0 a n � I I� I II � II i g m o- 6 F rA - 0 o ZZ 0 x+ a,rn O • m }p�L y I fTl A n O 2 C v T m W >C !A >> r m y m >9 2{8` C Q K W Z $ v tl$C N Ti R '.o C f*1 Z m CI rL �^ � <8 H m �2a,1 In t f O Z ; Fy ti Z T �Qf O c m � �� z m > j Q D Cl) I a 9 !AY `d I; i R c, T 4� m > C to < Z F R z °° >z t3 M n °m Z _ T {� m rn A r � -1 X rn yy fR 'ar u or vto ear 111 • WPFgect S Sheet title: PARCEL 3 SITE PLAN filename: TC•SP23.DWt3(SP &80A) q j gjRxR �v ° F a$ v lx!x A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT P.G.A. COMMONS PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL ORIDA no: 98017 date: 06/15/98 drawn d checked rwimons: 06 /07/01 DS �: . ,p• ao-� — oe 1,i16 s-1106 OLIVER • GLIDDEN & PARTNERS A R C M I T F. C T U R F. I N T E R I O R ° F 6 1 0 N 1401 FORUM WAY. WnT 100 WET PALM BEACH. FVSRIDA 11101 561- 6{46M1 FAX. fA1.681 -N# P -MAIL o0M l0),.ol— r 0 0 0 ■ I � fA IIn D rr,,z 1 nm 'R: t— m m (Ai Z O i> C7 Cn 0 rn I L r� - ®' r F I o n 8 m k C O� 0 B � I L f l f i� I, v ,,III 1a! a. __/ T. Mi. j j 0° rr yp3 ;z yy3 xs 0 ;iOip m o 2 m C� p 0 O Z qmN p n a5�zi G h� gA SO rt�1 m > \\Z m r Ome C m tyyt� n N y X i m 1 0 m v Om yy y y c = z am Iom ou 0 A t0 F. gg j in in o i ao o D ( ?� N 3 bV T m ieie qRo D 1 W rll sheet title: PARCEL 3 SITE PLAN filename: 7GSP23.DWG(SP3fi06) ■ y 419 Xglix 9 1A A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT P.G.A. COMMONS PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA Project no: 9 80 17 date: 06/15/98 drawn by: R17 checked by: JG revisions: 06 /07/01, 12/16/02 — Uos��E� oJ, Z.,,a o06Oo- iz: "u88 �II II I h �' II LII t 1 1 o, I` ' 11� II III I i I I I 1 OF I %- r rn' R7 LA tro r m o' LA A I 7 nll < O n 11 rmm y S fly u(/�� TT T TT OLIVER • GLIDDEN & PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T U R E 1 N T E R 1 0 R U F S I G N ■ 1401 FORUM WAY. SITE 100 WEST PAW RFAgI, FLORIDA 3N01 S61.6µ.6661 f•A% %1.6µ.66q0 - &MM.: -04"164-w- X o m C O D D I D n RI r W D m C au 1 � n N y X i m Q s 0 m v yy y y c = z am Iom ou 0 A t0 F. gg j in o i ao o D ( ?� N 3 m D O� TIT aC Uf.`C O T T r OF I %- r rn' R7 LA tro r m o' LA A I 7 nll < O n 11 rmm y S fly u(/�� TT T TT OLIVER • GLIDDEN & PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T U R E 1 N T E R 1 0 R U F S I G N ■ 1401 FORUM WAY. SITE 100 WEST PAW RFAgI, FLORIDA 3N01 S61.6µ.6661 f•A% %1.6µ.66q0 - &MM.: -04"164-w- X o m C O D D I D n RI r W CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD isAgenda Cover Memorandum Date Prepared: June 29, 2007 Meeting Date: July 24, 2007 Petition CUMJ 06 -12- 000008 • • SUBJECT /AGENDA ITEM Petition CUMJ 06 -12- 000008: Redevelopment of Palm Beach Gardens Elementary School Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council: A request by the School District of Palm Beach County for a Major Conditional Use to allow the demolition of the existing elementary school and the construction of a new one and two story educational facility, on the 11.44 -acre Palm Beach Gardens Elementary School site, generally located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Riverside Drive and Holly Drive. [X] Recommendation to APPROVE. [ ] Recommendation to DENY Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Finance: PZAB Action: Growth Finance [ ] Approved Management: Administrator: [ ] App. w/ conditions City Attorney Christine P. Tatum Pro ect N/A [ ] Denied Manager � Allan Owens [ ] Rec. approval Todd Miller, AICP [ ] Rec. app. w/ conds. [X] Quasi — Judicial Development Compliance Building [ ] Rec. Denial Accountant: [ ]Continued Bahareh Keshavarz- Wolfs, [ ] Legislative By N/A to: AICP [X] Public Hearing K. Labossiere Advertised: Attachments: Fees Paid: [N /A] Growth Manag Date: 7/13/07 Date: A.Conditional Use Administrator Paper: Palm Beach Criteria Analysis Kara Irwin, AIC Post B. Section 1013.33 (F. S.) C. Color Plans Approved By: City Manager [X] Required Budget Acct. #: D.Site Plan [] Not Required N/A E. Elevations F. PBC Traffic Concur•rency Ronald M. Ferris Affected Parties: [X] Notified [ ] Not Required Date Prepared: June 27, 2007 Meeting Date: July 24, 2007 Petition CUMJ o6- 12- 000008 BACKGROUND • In the early 1960s the MacArthur Foundation dedicated the subject property to the Board of Public Instruction of Palm Beach County, which constructed the existing elementary school in 1962. Currently, the School District of Palm Beach County (the "District ") is proposing to demolish the existing elementary school and construct a new education facility consisting of 2 interconnected buildings totaling 112,668 square feet, which will serve as the new Palm Beach Gardens Elementary School. The property is 11.44 acres in size. The school is located at the northeast corner of Riverside Drive and Holly Drive. LAND USE AND ZONING The subject site has a Public (P) future land -use designation and a zoning designation of Public or Institutional (PI). 2005 FLORIDA STATUTES In accordance with Section 1013.33, Florida Statutes (F.S.), entitled Coordination of planning (Educational facilities) with local governing bodies (attached), the District is required to request a determination from the City that a site plan for a proposed educational facility is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City shall determine, in writing within 45 days after receiving the necessary information and the school board's request for a determination, whether the proposed educational facility is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and consistent with local land •development regulations. If the determination is affirmative, school construction may commence and further City approvals are not required, except as provided in Section 1013.33, F.S. Failure of the City to make a determination in writing within 90 days after the District's request for a determination of consistency shall be considered an approval of the District's application. Further, the City may not deny the site application based on adequacy of the site plan as it relates solely to the needs of the school. If the site is consistent with the comprehensive plan's land use policies and categories in which public schools are identified as allowable uses, the City may not deny the application. The City may only consider the site plan and its adequacy as it relates to environmental concerns, health, safety and welfare, and effects on adjacent property. Standards and conditions may not be imposed which conflict with those established in Section 1013, F.S., or the Florida Building Code, unless mutually agreed and consistent with the interlocal agreement required by Section 1013.33, F.S. CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Future Land Use Element The following are policies set forth in the Future Land Use element of the City's Comprehensive Plan relating to school facilities with which the proposed site plan for the School is consistent: Policy 1.1.1.7.: The City shall ensure the availability for suitable land for public and institutional uses • necessary to support development by: 2 Date Prepared: June 27, 2007 Meeting Date: July 24, 2007 Petition CUMJ o6- 12- 000008 (Policy 1.1.1.7 continued) 02. Allowing public /institutional uses in certain land -use categories subject to limitations and locational criteria as identified in this Plan. Such locational criteria shall include the following standards: (c) Public /Institutional Uses shall be limited in intensity to maximum lot coverage of 40% of the site and a maximum building height of 50 feet. Staff Comments: The proposed School has maximum lot coverage of 23.8% of the site and a maximum building height of 35' to the tallest point. (d) Schools shall be considered as compatible and allowable in areas designated with any residential land -use category (RR20, RR10, RVL, RL, RM, RH). Further, schools shall be considered public /institutional uses and be allowable within areas designated Industrial (IND) and Public (P) on the Future Land Use Map. Staff Comments: The subject site has a Public (P) future land -use designation. (e) Public /Institutional Uses shall be buffered from adjacent land uses and shall be set back from adjacent roadways. Buffering for noise, odors, glare and lights shall be provided. Setbacks shall be a minimum of 25 feet in the front, 15 feet in the sides and rear and • buffers shall be a minimum of 5 feet. Buffers and setbacks may be increased depending on the characteristics of the proposed public /institutional use. Stadiums, outdoor recreational facilities and similar support facilities shall be located and buffered on the proposed site to minimize impacts on adjacent properties. Staff Comments: The proposed site plan incorporates a 55' front setback adjacent to Riverside Drive, a 90' side setback from Holly Drive, a 85' rear setback from the northern property line, and a 193' side setback from Ironwood Drive. The applicant has met the site plan requirements by designing a 20' landscape buffer along the northern property line adjacent to the existing industrial development, a 8' landscape buffer along the western property line adjacent to Riverside Drive, a 10' landscape buffer along the southern property line adjacent to Holly Drive, and a 10' landscape buffer along as much of the eastern property line adjacent to Ironwood Drive as was possible. Public School Facilities Element The following are policies set forth in the Public School Facilities element of the City's Comprehensive Plan relating to the siting and development review process for public school facilities: Objective 11.1.4.: To establish a process of coordination and collaboration between the County, local governments, and the School District in the planning and siting of public school facilities in coordination with planned infrastructure and public facilities. •Policy 11.1.4.1: The City of Palm Beach Gardens shall coordinate and provide for expedited review of development proposals with the School District during the development review process to ensure 3 Date Prepared: June 27, 2007 Meeting Date: July 24, 2007 Petition CUMJ o6- 12- 000008 integration of public school facilities with surrounding land uses and the compatibility of uses with • schools. Staff Comments: Staff has made every attempt to expeditiously review the District's development proposal in accordance with the City's LDRs to ensure the integration of the School facility with surrounding land uses. Policy 11.1.4.2: There shall be no significant environmental conditions and significant historical resources on a proposed site that cannot be mitigated or otherwise preclude development of the site for a public educational facility. Staff Comments: Staff has determined that the proposed site plan poses no threats to the environmental resources on site. No historical resources exist on site. Policy 11.1.4.3: The proposed site shall be suitable or adaptable for development in accordance with applicable water management standards, and shall not be in conflict with the adopted or officially accepted plans of the South Florida Water Management District, or any applicable Stormwater Utility or Drainage District. Staff Comments: The District has indicated that all necessary development permits have already been acquired. CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS • Section 78 -159 of the City's LDRs, entitled Permitted uses, conditional, and prohibited uses, requires "Schools, Public and Private," to be granted conditional use approval by the City Council. Demonstration of the project's compliance with the City's conditional use criteria established in Section 78 -52 is attached hereto as Attachment A. • PROJECT DETAILS Overview The District is proposing a 112,668 square -foot elementary school on the existing 11.44 acre Palm Beach Gardens Elementary School site. The school consists of two (2) interconnected buildings, one and two stories in height. In addition, the site plan incorporates sports fields for basketball, soccer, and baseball; and 2 playgrounds. Traffic Concurrency The new school design will increase capacity at the school from 556 students to 736 students in the program capacity, and 964 students in the core facilities. The applicant has provided a Traffic Concurrency Impact Analysis, and the City's Traffic Consultant has performed a coordinated review with the Palm Beach County Traffic Division. The County has granted concurrency with a buildout of 2010, but has suggested further analysis. The applicant has addressed the remaining minor comments from the City's Traffic Consultant relative to City concurrency, and City concurrency will be issued prior to the public hearing. Date Prepared: June 27, 2007 Meeting Date: July 24, 2007 Petition CUMJ o6 -12- 000008 Access and Traffic Circulation •Currently vehicular access is provided to the elementary school via two driveway connections off of Riverside Drive along the west property line, and a bus loop is provided at the northwest corner of the property, also off of Riverside Drive. The applicant is proposing to redesign the site to provide parent drop off and visitor access via a new connection from Ironwood Drive to a new "eastern" parking lot and drop off loop on the site. In addition, the applicant is providing a new bus loop connection from Holly Drive. Lastly, the applicant is proposing to develop a one -way parent drop off connection from Riverside Drive (northwest corner of the site) to the eastern parking lot. Parkin Parking requirements for schools are dicated by Chapter 423 of the Florida Building Code. Specifically, the proposed elementary school is required to provide 140 parking spaces, and has provided a total of 149 spaces. (See table below.) Type of Parking Required Provided Faculty & Staff 120 129 Service Staff 10 10 Visitors 1 per 100 (940 Core STU ETA) 10 10 Total 140 149 Landscapini; •The School District is limited in the amount of landscaping they can provide by State mandated requirements for Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CEPTD). Threrefore, the District has worked with the City Forester in order to come up with a landscape plan that addresses the City's major concerns and maintains the safety standards and budgetary constraints of the District. Common species proposed on the landscape plan include Live Oak, Cabbage Palm, Bald Cypress, Alexander Palms, Gumbo Limbos, etc. Lighting The District will be providing lighting around each building and the parking lots. The District has provided a photometrics plan which indicates the lighting will meet Palm Beach County lighting requirements, which are compatible with the City's lighting regulations. Furthermore, the District has indicated there will be no nighttime use of the school, such that parking lot and sports lights will be left on at night. Architecture The District is proposing a style of architecture which is Modern in flavor, and is consistent with other schools within the City. The construction style is "tilt -up ", and the building includes such features as smooth and rough finish combinations, and aluminum detailing. In addition, the applicant has provided additional articulation through the use of color, integrated rain gutters, and a flat roof for the building. DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE • The City's Development Review Committee performed a review of the project and has provided 5 Date Prepared: June 27, 2007 Meeting Date: July 24, 2007 Petition CUM.J o6- 12- 000008 comments and conditions of approval. • PUBLIC NOTICE In accordance with Section 78 -54 of the City's Land Development Regulations, entitled Public Notice, the City sent notice of this public hearing via US mail to all property owners within 500 feet of the site, and City staff has posted the property for the public hearing. STAFF RECOMMENDATION In accordance with the aforementioned Florida Statutes, staff has reviewed the proposed site plan and considered its adequacy as it relates to environmental concerns, health, safety and welfare, and effects on adjacent property. Staff has determined that the proposed site plan does not raise any environmental concerns; it ensures the health, safety and welfare of the students and faculty on the school campus, as well as that of the surrounding residents and visitors to the site; it minimizes negative effects on adjacent properties; and it is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, as stated herein. Therefore, staff recommends APPROVAL of Petition CUMJ- 06 -12- 000008, subject to the conditions of approval listed below. Planning and Zoning 1. Prior to scheduling for City Council, the applicant shall revise the color palette to be consistent with the earth tones approved for the Palm Beach Gardens High School. More specifically, the applicant shall modify the bright blue and orange accent colors to be consistent with the high •school application approved by City Council. 2. Concurrent with the site plan approval and prior to initiation of construction, the Applicant shall install a six -foot tall construction fence with a privacy tarp around the entire property line. (Planning & Zoning) 3. At no time shall staging of construction vehicles and /or service vehicles occur within a public right -of -way. All vehicular construction activities shall use a construction access off of Riverside Drive. 4. The Applicant shall coordinate and receive approval from the Growth Management Administrator prior to the closing of any public sidewalk. En ineering 5. Prior to the opening of school, or September 1, 2008 (whichever comes first), the Applicant shall construct the following road improvements: i. A northbound right turn lane and southbound left turn lane at the intersection of Riverside Drive and Driveway #1. (City Engineer) ii. A northbound left turn lane at the intersection of Ironwood Drive and Driveway #2. (City Engineer) 6. The Applicant shall provide manned traffic control, either at the City's request or whenever the need for traffic control becomes evident, as detenmined by the City Engineer. (City Engineer, Police) 7. The Applicant shall copy to the City all permit applications, permits, certifications and approvals. (City Engineer) *8. The Applicant shall provide all necessary construction zone signage and fencing as required by the City Engineer. (City Engineer) 6 Date Prepared: June 27, 2007 Meeting Date: July 24, 2007 Petition CUMJ o6- 12- 000008 9. Within 90 days of site plan approval, the Applicant shall provide a boundary plat of the site to • the City for review and approval. The plat should include all existing and proposed easements and like encumbrances, in accordance with LDR Section 78 -446 for City Council approval. (City Engineer and Planning & Zoning) 10. The construction, operation and /or maintenance of any elements of the subject project shall not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage of surrounding areas. If at any time during the project development it is determined by the South Florida Water Management District that any of the surrounding areas are experiencing negative drainage impacts caused by the project, it shall be the Applicant's responsibility to cure said impacts in a period of time and a manner acceptable to the City prior to additional construction activities. (City Engineer) 11. The applicant shall provide a letter of authorization from the utility easement owners authorizing encroachment of the landscape buffers within their respective utility easements. (City Engineer) 12. The Applicant shall comply with any and all Palm Beach County Traffic Division conditions as outlined in PBC Traffic Division equivalency and concurrency approval letters. (City Engineer) 13. The Applicant shall provide to the City letters of authorization from the applicable utility companies allowing landscaping and light poles to be placed within the utility easements. (City Engineer) 14. Prior to initiation of construction, the Applicant shall schedule a pre - construction meeting with City staff. (City Engineer) Miscellaneous 15. The Applicant shall notify the City's Public Works Division at least 10 working days prior to • the commencement of any work/construction activity within any public right -of -way within the City of Palm Beach Gardens. In the case of a city right -of -way, the applicant has at least five working days to obtain a right -of -way permit. Right -of -way permits may be obtained at the Building Division. Failure to comply with this condition could result in a Stop Work Order of all work/construction activity within the public right -of -way and the subject development site. (Public Works) • 7 • ATTACHMENT A CONDITIONAL USE ANALYSIS City of Palm Beach Gardens LDR Section 78 -52 (i) Comprehensive plan. The proposed, use is consistent with the comprehensive plan. StaffAnalusis: As demonstrated in the staff report for this petition, staff has determined that the proposed school is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. (2) Chapter requirements. The proposed use is consistent with all applicable requirements of this chapter. Staff Analysis: Section 78 -159 of the City's LDR's, entitled Permitted uses, conditional, and prohibited uses, requires "Schools, Public and Private," located within a Public or Institutional (PI) zoning district to acquire Major Conditional Use approval from the City Council. The subject property has an underlying zoning of PI; therefore, staff has requested the application be processed as a Major Conditional Use. The proposed development plans are generally consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. (g) Standards. The proposed use is consistent with the standards for such use as provided in Section 78 -159• • Staff Analysis: The proposed use is consistent with the additional standards provided in Section 78- 1590)• (4) Public welfare. The proposed use provides for the public health, safety, and welfare by: a. Providing for a safe and effective means of pedestrian access; b. Providing for a safe and effective means of vehicular ingress and egress; C. Providing for an adequate roadway system adjacent to and front of the site; d. Providing for safe and efficient onsite traffic circulation, parking, and overall control; and • e. Providing adequate access for public safety purposes, including fire and police protection. Staff Analysis: Staff has determined that the proposed use provides for the aforesaid standards and, therefore, provides for the public health, safety, and welfare. • (5) Screening and buffering. The proposed use utilizes such techniques as landscaping, screening, buffering, site or building design, or business operation procedures to mitigate impacts on surrounding properties, including such impact as: a. Noise; b. Glare; C. Odor; d. Ground -, wall-, or roof - mounted mechanical equipment; e. Perimeter, interior, and security lighting; L Signs; g. Waste disposal and recycling; h. Outdoor storage of merchandise and vehicles; • i. Visual impact; and j. Hours of operation. Staff Analysis: As provided in the staff report, City staff has continually urged the District to make every attempt to minimize the negative impacts of the project on the adjacent properties, including the issues listed above. (6) Utilities. The proposed use minimizes or eliminates the impact of utility installation, including underground and overhead utilities, on adjacent properties. Staff Analysis: As provided in the staff report, the District has made every attempt to minimize the negative impacts of the project on the adjacent properties. (7) Dimensional standards. The proposed use meets or exceeds all dimensional requirements required by the chapter. StaffAnalysis: The proposed site plan is generally consistent with the requirements of this chapter. • (8) Neighborhood plans. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, and standards of neighborhood plans. StaffAnalysis: N/A 2 • (9) Compatibility. The overall compatibility of the proposed development with adjacent and area uses, and character of area development. Staff Analysis: The site has functioned as a school since 1962. Furthermore, the proposed design of the school site, in staffs opinion, is compatible with the surrounding areas. (10) Patterns of development. The proposed use will result in logical, timely, and orderly development patterns. Staff Anal sis: As mentioned above, the site has operated as a high school since 1962. (11) Purpose and intent. The proposed use will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this chapter and the goals, objectives, and policies of the City. Staff Analysis: Staff has reviewed the proposed use and found it to be in harmony with the intent of the City's LDRs and the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. (12) Adverse impact. The design of the proposed use and structures will minimize any adverse visual impacts or impacts caused by the intensity of the use. •Staff Analysis: As provided in the staff report, the District has made every attempt to minimize the negative impacts of the project on the adjacent properties. (13) Environmental impact. The design of the proposed use minimizes any adverse impacts that may be created, including impacts on environmental and natural resources including air, water, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, and wetlands. Staff Analysis: Staff has reviewed the proposed development plan and determined that there will be no adverse impacts on environmental and natural resources. 40 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2006- >Ch1013 - >1, Select Year: 2006 1 Go <� The 2oo6 Florida Statutes ATTACHMENT B Title XLVIII Chapter 1013 View Entire Chapter K -20 EDUCATION CODE EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES 1013.33 Coordination of planning with local governing bodies. -- (1) It is the policy of this state to require the coordination of planning between boards and local governing bodies to ensure that plans for the construction and opening of public educational facilities are facilitated and coordinated in time and place with plans for residential development, concurrently with other necessary services. Such planning shall include the integration of the educational facilities plan and applicable policies and procedures of a board with the local comprehensive plan and land development regulations of local governments. The planning must include the consideration of allowing students to attend the school located nearest their homes when a new housing development is constructed near a county boundary and it is more feasible to transport the students a short distance to an existing facility in an adjacent county than to construct a new facility or transport students longer • distances in their county of residence. The planning must also consider the effects of the location of public education facilities, including the feasibility of keeping central city facilities viable, in order to encourage central city redevelopment and the efficient use of infrastructure and to discourage uncontrolled urban sprawl. In addition, all parties to the planning process must consult with state and local road departments to assist in implementing the Safe Paths to Schools program administered by the Department of Transportation. (2)(a) The school board, county, and nonexempt municipalities located within the geographic area of a school district shall enter into an interlocal agreement that jointly establishes the specific ways in which the plans and processes of the district school board and the local governments are to be coordinated. The intertocal agreements shall be submitted to the state land planning agency and the Office of Educational Facilities and the SMART Schools Clearinghouse in accordance with a schedule published by the state land planning agency. (b) The schedule must establish staggered due dates for submission of interlocal agreements that are executed by both the local government and district school board, commencing on March 1, 2003, and concluding by December 1, 2004, and must set the same date for all governmental entities within a school district. However, if the county where the school district is located contains more than 20 municipalities, the state land planning agency may establish staggered due dates for the submission of intertocal agreements by these municipalities. The schedule must begin with those areas where both the • number of districtwide capital- outlay full - time- equivalent students equals 80 percent or more of the current year's school capacity and the projected 5 -year student growth rate is 1,000 or greater, or where the projected 5 -year student growth rate is 10 percent or greater. httn- /A7,nxnai laa ctatP fl nc /Stat11tPC /in(1Px cfm?Ann mndP= l)i.cnlav StntutP.ri!Senrch Strinn 6/29/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2006- >Ch1013- >Section 33 : Online Sunshine Page 2 of 6 (c) If the student population has declined over the 5 -year period preceding the due date for submittal • of an interlocal agreement by the local government and the district school board, the local government and district school board may petition the state land planning agency for a waiver of one or more of the requirements of subsection (3). The waiver must be granted if the procedures called for in subsection (3) are unnecessary because of the school district's declining school age population, considering the district's 5 -year work program prepared pursuant to s. 1013.35. The state land planning agency may modify or revoke the waiver upon a finding that the conditions upon which the waiver was granted no longer exist. The district school board and local governments must submit an interlocal agreement within 1 year after notification by the state land planning agency that the conditions for a waiver no longer exist. (d) Interlocal agreements between local governments and district school boards adopted pursuant to s. 163.3177 before the effective date of subsections (2) -(9) must be updated and executed pursuant to the requirements of subsections (2) -(9), if necessary. Amendments to interlocal agreements adopted pursuant to subsections (2) -(9) must be submitted to the state land planning agency within 30 days after execution by the parties for review consistent with subsections (3) and (4). Local governments and the district school board in each school district are encouraged to adopt a single interlocal agreement in which all join as parties. The state land planning agency shall assemble and make available model interlocal agreements meeting the requirements of subsections (2) -(9) and shall notify local governments and, jointly with the Department of Education, the district school boards of the requirements of subsections (2) -(9), the dates for compliance, and the sanctions for noncompliance. The •state land planning agency shalt be available to informally review proposed interlocal agreements. If the state land planning agency has not received a proposed interlocal agreement for informal review, the state land planning agency shall, at least 60 days before the deadline for submission of the executed agreement, renotify the local government and the district school board of the upcoming deadline and the potential for sanctions. (3) At a minimum, the interlocal agreement must address interlocal agreement requirements in s. 163.3180(13)(8), except for exempt local governments as provided in s. 163.3177(12), and must address the following issues: (a) A process by which each local government and the district school board agree and base their plans on consistent projections of the amount, type, and distribution of population growth and student enrollment. The geographic distribution of jurisdiction -wide growth forecasts is a major objective of the process. (b) A process to coordinate and share information relating to existing and planned public school facilities, including school renovations and closures, and local government plans for development and redevelopment. (c) Participation by affected local governments with the district school board in the process of • evaluating potential school closures, significant renovations to existing schools, and new school site selection before land acquisition. Local governments shall advise the district school board as to the consistency of the proposed closure, renovation, or new site with the local comprehensive plan, httn• /Axnznv IPa 05;ta fl iic /.Ctnt1itPS /inriPY r.fm ?Ann mnrlP= f)isnlav Statiite&.Search String 6/29/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2006- >Ch1013- >Section 33 : Online Sunshine Page 3 of 6 •including appropriate circumstances and criteria under which a district school board may request an amendment to the comprehensive plan for school siting. (d) A process for determining the need for and timing of onsite and offsite improvements to support new construction, proposed expansion, or redevelopment of existing schools. The process shall address identification of the party or parties responsible for the improvements. (e) A process for the school board to inform the local government regarding the effect of comprehensive plan amendments on school capacity. The capacity reporting must be consistent with laws and rules regarding measurement of school facility capacity and must also identify how the district school board will meet the public school demand based on the facilities work program adopted pursuant to s. 1013.35. (f) Participation of the local governments in the preparation of the annual update to the school board's 5 -year district facilities work program and educational plant survey prepared pursuant to s. 1013.35. (g) A process for determining where and how joint use of either school board or local government facilities can be shared for mutual benefit and efficiency. (h) A procedure for the resolution of disputes between the district school board and local governments, which may include the dispute resolution processes contained in chapters 164 and 186. • (i) An oversight process, including an opportunity for public participation, for the implementation of the interlocal agreement. (4)(a) The Office of Educational Facilities and SMART Schools Clearinghouse shall submit any comments or concerns regarding the executed interlocal agreement to the state land planning agency within 30 days after receipt of the executed interlocal agreement. The state land planning agency shall review the executed interlocal agreement to determine whether it is consistent with the requirements of subsection (3), the adopted local government comprehensive plan, and other requirements of law. Within 60 days after receipt of an executed interlocal agreement, the state land planning agency shall publish a notice of intent in the Florida Administrative Weekly and shall post a copy of the notice on the agency's Internet site. The notice of intent must state that the interlocal agreement is consistent or inconsistent with the requirements of subsection (3) and this subsection as appropriate. (b) The state land planning agency's notice is subject to challenge under chapter 120; however, an affected person, as defined in s. 163.3184(1)(a), has standing to initiate the administrative proceeding, and this proceeding is the sole means available to challenge the consistency of an interlocal agreement required by this section with the criteria contained in subsection (3) and this subsection. In order to have standing, each person must have submitted oral or written comments, recommendations, or objections to the local government or the school board before the adoption of the interlocal agreement • by the district school board and local government. The district school board and local governments are parties to any such proceeding. In this proceeding, when the state land planning agency finds the interlocal agreement to be consistent with the criteria in subsection (3) and this subsection, the }1ttn- / /1in1nxr iPrt etatP f1 11Q /.CtAt11tPQ /1nr1PX rfm`JAnn mnrlP= ni.cnlav Stntut P.&Se2rch Strinp 6/29/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2006- >Ch1013- >Sect1on 33 : Online Sunshine Page 4 of 6 interlocal agreement must be determined to be consistent with subsection (3) and this subsection if the local government's and school board's determination of consistency is fairly debatable. When the state land planning agency finds the interlocal agreement to be inconsistent with the requirements of subsection (3) and this subsection, the local government's and school board's determination of consistency shall be sustained unless it is shown by a preponderance of the evidence that the interlocal agreement is inconsistent. (c) If the state land planning agency enters a final order that finds that the interlocal agreement is inconsistent with the requirements of subsection (3) or this subsection, the state land planning agency shall forward it to the Administration Commission, which may impose sanctions against the local government pursuant to s. 163.3184(11) and may impose sanctions against the district school board by directing the Department of Education to withhold an equivalent amount of funds for school construction available pursuant to ss. 1013.65, 1013.68, 1013.70, and 1013.72. (5) If an executed interlocal agreement is not timely submitted to the state land planning agency for review, the state land planning agency shall, within 15 working days after the deadline for submittal, issue to the local government and the district school board a notice to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to submit an executed interlocal agreement by the deadline established by the agency. The agency shall forward the notice and the responses to the Administration Commission, which may enter a final order citing the failure to comply and imposing sanctions against the local government and district school board by directing the appropriate agencies to withhold at least 5 •percent of state funds pursuant to s. 163.3184(11) and by directing the Department of Education to withhold from the district school board at least 5 percent of funds for school construction available pursuant to ss. 1013.65, 1013.68, 1013.70, and 1013.72. (6) Any local government transmitting a public school element to implement school concurrency pursuant to the requirements of s. 163.3180 before the effective date of this section is not required to amend the element or any interlocal agreement to conform with the provisions of subsections (2) -(8) if the element is adopted prior to or within 1 year after the effective date of subsections (2) -(8) and remains in effect. (7) Except as provided in subsection (8), municipalities meeting the exemption criteria in s. 163.3177 (12) are exempt from the requirements of subsections (2), (3), and (4). (8) At the time of the evaluation and appraisal report, each exempt municipality shalt assess the extent to which it continues to meet the criteria for exemption under s. 163.3177(12). If the municipality continues to meet these criteria, the municipality shalt continue to be exempt from the interlocal agreement requirement. Each municipality exempt under s. 163.3177(12) must comply with the provisions of subsections (2) -(8) within 1 year after the district school board proposes, in its 5 -year district facilities work program, a new school within the municipality's jurisdiction. • (9) A board and the local governing body must share and coordinate information related to existing and planned school facilities; proposals for development, redevelopment, or additional development; and infrastructure required to support the school facilities, concurrent with proposed development. A school kttn• / /Aznznz/ laa Ztata fl nc /.Ctatntec /index cfm2Ann mnrle= Disnlav Statute &Search Strine... 6/29/2007 Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2006- >Ch1013 -> Section 33 : Online Sunshine Page 5 of 6 board shall use information produced by the demographic, revenue, and education estimating • conferences pursuant to s. 216.136 when preparing the district educational facilities plan pursuant to s. 1013.35, as modified and agreed to by the local governments, when provided by interlocal agreement, and the Office of Educational Facilities and SMART Schools Clearinghouse, in consideration of local governments' population projections, to ensure that the district educational facilities plan not only reflects enrollment projections but also considers applicable municipal and county growth and development projections. The projections must be apportioned geographically with assistance from the local governments using local government trend data and the school district student enrollment data. A school board is precluded from siting a new school in a jurisdiction where the school board has failed to provide the annual educational facilities plan for the prior year required pursuant to s. 1013.35 unless the failure is corrected. (10) The location of educational facilities shall be consistent with the comprehensive plan of the appropriate local governing body developed under part II of chapter 163 and consistent with the plan's implementing land development regulations. (11) To improve coordination relative to potential educational facility sites, a board shall provide written notice to the local government that has regulatory authority over the use of the land consistent with an interlocal agreement entered pursuant to subsections (2) -(8) at least 60 days prior to acquiring or leasing property that may be used for a new public educational facility. The local government, upon receipt of this notice, shall notify the board within 45 days if the site proposed for acquisition or lease is •consistent with the land use categories and policies of the local government's comprehensive plan. This preliminary notice does not constitute the local government's determination of consistency pursuant to subsection (12). (12) As early in the design phase as feasible and consistent with an interlocal agreement entered pursuant to subsections (2) -(8), but no later than 90 days before commencing construction, the district school board shall in writing request a determination of consistency with the local government's comprehensive plan. The local governing body that regulates the use of land shall determine, in writing within 45 days after receiving the necessary information and a school board's request for a determination, whether a proposed educational facility is consistent with the local comprehensive plan and consistent with local land development regulations. If the determination is affirmative, school construction may commence and further local government approvals are not required, except as provided in this section. Failure of the local governing body to make a determination in writing within 90 days after a district school board's request for a determination of consistency shall be considered an approval of the district school board's application. Campus master plans and development agreements must comply with the provisions of ss. 1013.30 and 1013.63. (13) A local governing body may not deny the site applicant based on adequacy of the site plan as it relates solely to the needs of the school. If the site is consistent with the comprehensive plan's land use policies and categories in which public schools are identified as allowable uses, the local government • may not deny the application but it may impose reasonable development standards and conditions in accordance with s. 1013.51(1) and consider the site plan and its adequacy as it relates to environmental concerns, health, safety and welfare, and effects on adjacent property. Standards and conditions may httn- //unxnu lPa state fl ins /Statutes /index cfm7Ann mode= Disnlav Statute &Search Strine... 6/29/2007 • • • Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes :- >2006- >Ch1013- >Section 33 : Online Sunshine Page 6 of 6 not be imposed which conflict with those established in this chapter or the Florida Building Code, unless mutually agreed and consistent with the interlocal agreement required by subsections (2) -(8). (14) This section does not prohibit a local governing body and district school board from agreeing and establishing an alternative process for reviewing a proposed educational facility and site plan, and offsite impacts, pursuant to an interlocal agreement adopted in accordance with subsections (2) -(8). (15) Existing schools shall be considered consistent with the applicable local government comprehensive plan adopted under part II of chapter 163. If a board submits an application to expand an existing school site, the local governing body may impose reasonable development standards and conditions on the expansion only, and in a manner consistent with s. 1013.51(1). Standards and conditions may not be imposed which conflict with those established in this chapter or the Florida Building Code, unless mutually agreed. Local government review or approval is not required for: (a) The placement of temporary or portable classroom facilities; or (b) Proposed renovation or construction on existing school sites, with the exception of construction that changes the primary use of a facility, includes stadiums, or results in a greater than 5 percent increase in student capacity, or as mutually agreed upon, pursuant to an interlocal agreement adopted in accordance with subsections (2) -(8). History. - -s. 23, ch. 2002 -296; s. 828, ch. 2002 -387; s. 129, ch. 2003 -1; s. 18, ch. 2005 -290. Copyright ©1995 -2006 The Florida Legislature • Privacy Statement • Contact Us httn• /Axnanxu lav 02tP fl me /Ctatnte.c /inriPx cfm ?Ann mode= Disnlav Statute &Search String... 6/29/2007 Department of Engineering and Public Works P.O. Box 21229 West Palm Beach, FL 33416 -1229 (561)684.4000 www.pbcgov.com Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Addie L. Greene, Vice Chairperson • Karen T. Marcus Jeff Koons Warren H. Newell Mary McCarty Burt Aaronson County Administrator Robert Weisman • "An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer' OD- V-,6 printed on recycled paper ATTACHMENT F November 8, 2006 Ms. Judy A. T. Dye Assistant City Engineer City of Palm Beach Gardens - LBFH Inc. '9 3550 S.W. Corporate Pkwy. Palm City, FL 34990 RE: Palm Beach Gardens Elementary School Expansion TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS. REVIEW Dear Judy: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic study for the proposed school project entitled; Palm Beach: Gardens Elementary School Expansion, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. The project is summarized as follows: Location: North side of Holy Drive, just east of Riverside Drive. Municipality: Palm Beach Gardens. PCN #: 52- 43- 42- 07 -00- 000 -5050. Existing Uses: Elementary School for 658 Students Proposed Uses: Addition of 348 Students New Daily Trips: 355 New PH Trips: 105 AM and 91 PM Build -out: 2010 Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the proposed school expansion project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. It is however suggested for the consultant to conduct a peak hour traffic operations analysis for both school opening and closure periods. This analysis should include evaluation of adequacy of the existing vehicle storage at the drop -off /pick -up areas, using existing plus newly forecasted trips, and application of a PHF of 0.5. No building permits are to be issued by the City, after the build -out date, specified above. The County traffic concurrency approval is subject to the Project Aggregation Rules set forth in the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. If you have any questions regarding the above comments, please contact me at 684 -4030. Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY _NGINEER Masoud Atefi, M CE TPS Administrato , unicipalities - Traffic Division CC: PTC Inc. File: General - TPS Mun. Traffic Study Review F:I TRAFFIC1malAdmin \Approvals1061022.doc d 6� . III 0 HP-1, 10 TIM, !p a3p C 9 as r Ily lill NP lei ^sk, 41 a o m itrt; sa, >acr R81338g 13; € b F m is m O HIM m n A00H 8 z o L =o£ g P— D-- 44 4 � o r n a 0 Z 12 0 rnIm cum �r 2 C-rnrn o 1 Z z rn D °> o � o e 3 0 po o T . � I rD ,,kh[ N c N o li °o p Q1 0 O v D V Z3 _ z cA m ♦► `11 0 Z0' �0 x =v O O ° Z C) N O Cl) r- 1 3 03 8 1M., g A Hut O` $I �8m °'m v -922; 8 i �g �g 0 8� m� yI a m A W S is m O i 9 C z 4 � o r n a 0 Z 12 0 rnIm cum �r 2 C-rnrn o 1 Z z rn D °> o � o e 3 0 po o T . � I rD ,,kh[ N c N o li °o p Q1 0 O v D V Z3 _ z cA m ♦► `11 0 Z0' �0 x =v O O ° Z C) N O Cl) r- 1 3 03 8 1M., g A Hut O` $I �8m °'m v -922; 8 i �g �g 0 8� m� yI a m N N a o - 3 WY Al ABA • m p All 0 N b Z • • • � ....................... RIVERSIDE DRIVE ,,» wM,..�,,,...,v,,,,. .,., ,»: ........ ........:.,. .,.. ,.,. .,.,,,.,.,,..,.,....... ..:., .... ....................... RVERSIDE DRIVE i i I I y I Y ' v i R. I pp pg r- i 7 Zs i� fN I i \ ILI, 999 \ a I I n ICI r o o I II 2 d� i �Q °m IN �Z I fill, I g! �$ AAR 5 $ � �€ Ra $ a m �m mm rHC s.. C=O D n 0 r c' q m i s b • • � � r 4 r" M co cv M; O I 6 d� s • gal 0, jIll s 0 gg Rnw GaaCw�nQggNmrbr 6 Lent TIP 2:3i 5R CD 4 NY AVENUE • ? J� IRIS AVENUE 0 0 0 RIVERSIDE DRIVE (45TH AVENUE) Pak 4 al Av Mill ag A— 6 L.W1. AMA mm9w 1 9.1 I-If 19 � / S � t a � ( 0 0 0 Em MH | / § - || |®f$ ® -�w� § ■ §@B § \ :( CM0 . ■ ,22 ■ � < � � 2 | |' || §@§ � $ § 0 0 0 I i IL b' rP� Z 2 N i l_ Jr _ / Y � 0 s r V 6� op 0 Ri o t • m il E IRIS AVENUE ■ al I (� |� 0 0 2 3 5� -,-,,7r H -I t � _ � e � | - §� E� �\ `)( }�2 \ § � � }.\ © • § % Lo o > � , \ j) f ;\ . — 0 0 2 3 5� -,-,,7r H -I t � _ � e � | - §� E� �\ `)( }�2 \ § � � }.\ © • § % Lo o > 0 m O m 1 z 2 i fA 0 0 0 4� � h 4b4b �I �I F I � I I I K y O c x m O z 2IA401 3IA401 i/ =A1 III � l u I N ® an.modmexwmors��w. 3 I d wb 4m g'g 1 i R 4 4 T I� I d y� E 14 m1 ;Q g 44 rx sro a >a 0 C m m u z D v > — Oz ym _ y rN ` I � - I I I tE5 !Ea �l i ot II rr yu I I 1` — I f l vAam � I 1i I C.0 t�II oilI w w0 we CD 0a m tl f� v 1vr � �w ,I 's >1 �•._ �. _r_ y T O y +j IT RI O O III = i 2 I I I II A F A A 0 G - � R II II yy �1 y g i/ =A1 III � l u I N ® an.modmexwmors��w. 3 I d wb 4m g'g 1 i R 4 4 T I� I d y� E 14 m1 ;Q g 44 rx sro a >a 0 C m m u z D v > — Oz ym _ y rN ` I � - I I I tE5 !Ea �l i ot II rr yu I I 1` — I f l vAam � I 1i I C.0 t�II oilI tl b A 'y 4 L �4 II Ill 5 f9 f ed il'A' B4 f Sr. f � vv� � ep� $�� 99 �� a THE, FIR N H 1 w w0 we CD 0a m f� v 1vr er �w � z III II G - � R tl b A 'y 4 L �4 II Ill 5 f9 f ed il'A' B4 f Sr. f � vv� � ep� $�� 99 �� a THE, FIR N H 1 0 0 0 T m m r m D O z IX (N N, '� � ■ P �€ P"o P "o xs �' sa tr ra r'ra ra sa r ra • r 9 L z z z 'J i � . .cg 9 s gg s w CT 0 I y� �LJ T m m r m D O z IX (N ;M if _J_ N c 0 s r P=A4M 0 31mm D 1 m m CA m r D Z 4 i W '� � ■ P �€ P"o P "o xs �' sa tr ra r'ra ra sa r ra • r v JIF40 . .cg 9 s gg s a4 n -1 if a F f� q { O � 'I >` -I 'a iI I f>` t g a P G lyay — d ;M if _J_ N c 0 s r P=A4M 0 31mm D 1 m m CA m r D Z 4 i W I``III'II'� F I 4� Ile �I m� 4�� t 6 .. �, ,r ilia I v JIF40 . .cg 9 s gg s a4 n -1 if a F f� q I``III'II'� F I 4� Ile �I m� 4�� t 6 .. �, ,r O m m D r r m m m' z z ,r i A 41 P Jf f 1 f� yA402 3/A4.02 9$ b ti � ti ti ti 5?mm� p m o Jig a � ilia I O m m D r r m m m' z z ,r i A 41 P Jf f 1 f� yA402 3/A4.02 9$ b ti � ti ti ti 5?mm� p m o Jig a � i I I� I Af00 � fi II t o I it I o. I �� II I I Z tt - I II I C 11x1 1 1 L 1 y by l jf h ��O j' {4 ff ml \ D h M 4 I11 I M I D 1 -II�4 ill � I ill a rf� r I,I All 11 y y I a� pl I tl 4 ag a� J gg �f z' =44 c ga a I -IM f cr IF J a _1— T I z 0 0 II e � I q � K I« �I I y I yX- M r 4 D I M 1 D ZI - 6 W z 0 x M r 0 z 0 r P � P §� 4b _ z_4.o3 1/A403 b A z 0 r r r r x r'I Igo $ z �I bt a -w rr r•v wr r I 4 ;.. 4 4 III I I _ I II V } 01 . IWO IEE9 Lid a g a M I I al� ., P� Pfdp P;Pgo - _ ,T�1, YTSY aa• Y fr Y 2 \ m ar � r 9 Ti 4 - 0 y Z rr - OR l I jj � T 14 I y �' TS ]d r+j iIB yr�� fd Itr fd r r � TiP 114 lie C. 7 ;4" - Mm Gorram AMwmr 6 LImA� � � �gga�Ep;��'rtitsG f � t- • ri Vo to I III I!i FT_ F7 E j 1IL 1 �� L_ I -'_ � �� II ll; F-11 I. I 114 I II III F—T F-T L. -74 2 oil I:- 9A x is m z . g m 0 4p- to P. m cn __4 m 0 z 9 Z Aj E 0 0 I 1 9 m ch --I m Or- rn Z A,5 Z 0 m m m < 44 4 0 z 14 1 m Cf) --A m m > I 0 Z U) 0 m r- m *1 0 Z iV :53a L Mm amn 0 CO z O U) m 0 z 0 0 9 s i 4$ a� a� wa ea Y ma I E_ �g 6 L 171, -nulr i co 0 z O U) m 9 0 z } Alflhki I I _ I1�IIIIIII. a 4 � (C (� �0000►� z o=oo 3 � r 8 W N N + 1; 'm 01 fill K rn 0 C S mm O z i1a ra iv� m D m D _1 O z i 1 2 1 D z m z { m m C) O z .r b I v i a �- -- QI yJ r m D m D _1 O z i 1 2 1 D z m z { m m C) O z .r b I v i i` —tW1 t Pt{ aa 4ip 3 R •� y G m 1 m m D O z r Rg( a 9� 6p 9p l A 9 aa s a a.R.Gh. amine.,sum ic CA 0 c ;� it o z° �j? •��` �- -- yJ r i` —tW1 t Pt{ aa 4ip 3 R •� y G m 1 m m D O z r Rg( a 9� 6p 9p l A 9 aa s a a.R.Gh. amine.,sum ic CA 0 c ;� it o z° �j? •��` D • • • .._.,- _— .__..._.._ -_�. tl' ♦. rte 9 36 1 9IAal 55 7 :,T91m2 4 0FCvV: 13m0 0 _au ma 9,& Y!� ° §9& 9439§ 43 ° §�43 °J�5�43u §N =s485�9Y98 §$ §P I I I i '0 9 N Ia !➢ Z i�� a O 0� j 9 9 L C ? � � I a s x xw 00 So T 3" i' 9E' fB1uHl1 LJ\ I 1 9 36 1 9IAal 55 7 :,T91m2 4 0FCvV: 13m0 0 _au ma 9,& Y!� ° §9& 9439§ 43 ° §�43 °J�5�43u §N =s485�9Y98 §$ §P I I I i '0 9 N Ia !➢ Z i�� a O 0� j 9 9 L C ? � � I a s x xw 00 So T 3" i' 9E' fB1uHl1 i �F e iP i )gig v o p ly AiE�N I wglx,i I t j � �gi ; $11, �� I OILVence Ooodwh Ak=RCWP& UrAk oil 9�oo�1 mmx • EM oz g 0 O E7 OC cn .-,I 0 0 0 rG cool I] lr 0 0 0 s gels 33 Rig 9� g33A�gqg 8�' i 4 � a a k RMU �MIYrdr 6li.r _ n 03 i. coHSUCiiNC — fn � m • cv�vmv TAE M=1m MF!g m zv oo, �o mo �o imDQ; - �zm �m SLD in oZ F, p ,� z m Z m Am Ln D 08 2 0 m N m Z6�z m oc �\ D M>, D X O j 0 Z m „ 0 va ;> D A� +D+� A '4 I'1 Z Om DSO z � v =F m O r D ;K ,ZO D� n 0j1 D m 0 >gs I u R 9 0 0 w „m I T - Itl � l l 7• uao �n> INA �ediiNYOidr iu.r — rE i— / 8 � 1 —- / / a� H 11M 111 111 a,�g !,I I 'Jil 1 � �I 19 111 a� � �I I no & Y N E Y UN— F, �vTm 777 .oi� i8 Yy7z 8 �O y 0 0 0 0 0 0 'g pl Q Q�� 8 Q Q QQQQ�i�i� s 2 I A X IDO V F O z AZ�OQ O � �mo 00 DmDCOc�� Omm ° Di ZR zN Vl�m Sm O < {r, Z °_m m >m? m ;o° pmmF A0o D Z JC 00 ZO Z O0 Z—WA nn <; N D D m D Agz� °zo N m Zij Z P O D mmz >o� Z " O T OOrS N D r- 1010 Osr i, Z V �N< n >� ' 0 O rnz0 n °ate D CDpyp >0> mz v e I al s �o f11A 4 F. Fcil�R� v v v v — 11III bx4 � I I m =fin I g �Ar 99p�i (516 MWNUE) will P _ I I I I Y I I I I�Q A6QP I I - 93 R p}Q,R� (2W AANLK) G ;�'jo.' J III. i _ II IrI I CY ! I ' sY . 5a Q i I I d I �la r'I 4 y7 p / / de =s \ / / a 33 / A� V- A-__— fib �§ gig g ( oil file �a4 f € o i oil e 1 A -R i • 3 d � 4 E �� `a$ s�lp�p! s'£is U R Ev tCNi Q2��i£is'3v� °rye CONSIILIINC Z a a a 9 RL g 55�e5 - L66SCC " -_` -66 6b "- _6 "`55 565G5 " " -_5 6- 'x56555 "_6 6r 6 665 6 i+e'a6 6 6 x aGGG 'a S 6a6G 66$ � & fiGG'a666 s666G 6G6y G 6 -6 a &665G i G6 aG "a G - 6 G 6s G 66Gz 6S 66gg a 6I 6 65 6s 6 6 6G 6 65G6aa "a 9a6 S5 S 6 g&& V- A-__— fib �§ gig g ( oil file �a4 f € o i oil e 1 A -R i • 3 d � 4 E �� `a$ s�lp�p! s'£is U R Ev tCNi Q2��i£is'3v� °rye CONSIILIINC Z 0 0 0 i III J 11gII 6 Mom zDONo F!5 =1;0 a mzvp0 0 �m of m 0�vn mii zo m ;"p p o -)"Nf ,�0(�pp > m -4 Z Z. <A ~o =gyp o 8. m�vC nD D~ p�s� A D Z _U D ZO p Ln vzp� NN-1 DDm z n D f Zv, 077 m N p1D VI F 11°10 o;c L"zv phi ND�e0 rnZ0 rnmn 0 y V D CDp= >Z> 0 ,m i PPS 11 ! I If PB � B� I aJl ; I r, qyyy __ tl�tli i 4" c cd '54 _a MM'FIIUC vat V an ic K 59 zz 1 B3 (21O M4 IrA ole V I J a n 1 9 � oaf O -- ists C7 9 6 p }pF�mD� �gi y }�g75 °� o i71 NSA , s8 I�i �_ Zi X� m Bull 11108 II 1111:10 000000010010000000000000000100000000 vv v ooao�a �I� � msaa�_ aes�s� o r�s B MUSUMMUSES-0 B8011001000:1 SIMON 11111111118 n 1 9 � oaf O -- ists C7 9 6 p }pF�mD� �gi y }�g75 °� o i71 NSA , s8 I�i �_ Zi X� m 0 0 0 N S M X A '>QW2 E;Foi mZO -o, mo$o �m os m E A m� 1 F f7 �m Z� D L Z ?' <_�g o°= oox� � H N nn m�oc O Z 11 ]lOU �mT Z. 0y O A K D z wn i I — a 9 yr AVOM a +� � I i r, i V it 1YG i mm mom— Alai 4L, � ` I �X- I I I I ,I �i II Z/x i i i i n_ m NPR � _CC � � Apps 6 i n h p } r ✓ f n n ggg' s 8 � pp Jul u S]m G �7°i M i ] RrgF3��Rry B 'I VA If a ¢� IMP ,a all _ ILU�bnNeairB lai _- _ C ___ lu- C.b qq g`9 x �� Tni i�� CCNSIILTINGg ;� O P _ • s N C i •. 4b i • s f ggqq j$ � mom it fA fA C i � lk-!. r; �3 is mme a _ THE 1 n° CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD Agenda Cover Memorandum • Date Prepared: July 9, 2007 Meeting Date: July 24, 2007 • Subject /Agenda Item: MISC- 07 -05- 000030: Gardens Commerce Center Master Signage Program Recommendation to City Council: A request by Brian Cheguis of Cotluer and Hearing, Inc. on behalf of the applicant, Pishon Partners, LLC, for approval of a master signage program as required by Resolution 18, 2007. The Gardens Commerce Center is a Targeted Expedited Permitting Process petition and is located on the west side of Riverside Drive, east of Interstate I -95, north of Plat 5 and approximately 300 feet south of Burns Road. [X] Recommendation to APPROVE with 1 waiver [ ] Recommendation to DENY Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Finance: PZAB Action: Growth Management: [ ] Approved Planning Manager project B d' countan [ J App. w/ conditions Brad Wiseman, AICP Manager S� [ ]Denied y; K. Labossiere Stephen Mayer [ J Rec. approval City Attorney Sr. Planner Fees Paid [Yes] [ ] Rec. app. w/ conds. per memo 7/9/07 [ ] Rec. Denial Christine Tatum [X] Quasi — Judicial [ ] Continued to: Dev lopment Compliance [ ] Legislative Funding Source: [ ] Public Hearing Bahareh Keshavarz- Wolfs, [ ] Operating Attachments: AICP Advertised: [ ] Required [XJ Other NA • Applicant narrative Gro h Management [ X ] Not Required • Master signage A istrator Budget Acct. #: program and reduced NA plans Kara Irwin, AICP • Resolution 18, 2007 Approved By: Affected parties: Ronald M. Ferris [ ] Notified [ X ] Not Required City Manager • C7 • Date Prepared: July 9, 2007 Meeting Date: July 24, 2007 BACKGROUND On December 5, 2006, the Gardens Commerce Center was approved as a Targeted Expedited Permitting Process (TEPP) petition. On March, 1, 2007, the City Council approved the site plan through the adoption of Resolution 18, 2007, to allow the development of the Gardens Commerce Center Planned Unit Development (PUD), consisting of three buildings with 41,577 square feet of light industrial use and 27,718 square feet of accessory professional office use on a 4.45 -acre site. The Gardens Commerce Center is located on the west side of Riverside Drive, east of Interstate I -95, north of Plat 5 and approximately 300 feet south of Burns Road. The signage program addresses condition number five of Resolution 18, 2007. LAND USE & ZONING The subject site has Future Land -Use and Vision map designations of Industrial (I) and has a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay with an underlying Light Industrial (MIA) zoning district designation. PROJECT DETAILS Signage Request The applicant is proposing two principal tenant signs for the project. Both are for "Thies Distributing" and located on the west and south facades of building one. The applicant is also proposing a tenant wall sign which reads, "The Gardens Commerce Center ", located on the east fagade of building two and one for "Protech Radiation Safety Products ", located on the north fagade of building three. The applicant is also proposing tenant signs for the individual bays in building three, which will be located above each respective tenant's entryway and this signage will be limited to one wall sign per tenant. In the event a tenant occupies two bays within one entrance tower, then the tenant is only entitled to a single sign centered on the tower feature. Pursuant to City Code, the individual tenant signs are limited to 21.5 square feet in signage area. Also, these tenant signs are to be uniform in color, but with the approval of the requested waiver (please see waiver section), the tenant signs may be designed with a variety of font styles. The individual signage details of the master signage program are below: Building One: Wall sign for principal tenant (Thies Distributing) * Waiver granted per Resolution 18, 2007 Proposed Allowed Number 2 2* Letter Size 24" 36" Signage Area (West fagade) (South fagade) 57.6 sf 74.88 sf 90 sf 90 sf * Waiver granted per Resolution 18, 2007 • Date Prepared: July 9, 2007 Meeting Date: July 24, 2007 Building Two: Wall sign for princip al tenant The Gardens Commerce Center) *Calculation does not include space in- between sign text as it is preserving an architectural banding Building Three: Wall sign for principal tenant Protech Radiation Safety Products) Proposed Allowed Number 1 1 Letter Size 24" 24" -Signage Area 61.38 sf * 90 sf *Calculation does not include space in- between sign text as it is preserving an architectural banding Building Three: Wall sign for principal tenant Protech Radiation Safety Products) *The calculation factored in the logo (6 so as separate from the text box (84 so Building Three: Wall signs for ground floor tenants Proposed Allowed Number 1 1 Letter Size 24" 24" -Signage Area 90 sf* 90 sf *The calculation factored in the logo (6 so as separate from the text box (84 so Building Three: Wall signs for ground floor tenants • *See condition of approval to reduce the signage area The applicant is requesting a waiver for uniform type, color, material, shape and style of wall signs for principal and tenant signs. The applicant is proposing a different color and style on Building One. The applicant was granted two waivers on building one pursuant to Resolution 18, 2007, which allows the two principal tenant signs above the first floor. However, the applicant is proposing the signs on building one be green, while the signs on building two and three are bronze. The tenant signs on building two and three will maintain the same color (bronze), but the applicant is also requesting an allowance for different styles or fonts. (Please see waiver table). Suite numbers are located in an acceptable location in accordance with the City's GIS Manager and Police Department. The building address numbers will be backlit in accordance to Police Department policy, addressing building identification at night. [This space is intentionally left blank] Proposed Allowed Number One per tenant One per tenant Letter Size 24" 22" -Signage Area 43.42 sf 21.49 sf • *See condition of approval to reduce the signage area The applicant is requesting a waiver for uniform type, color, material, shape and style of wall signs for principal and tenant signs. The applicant is proposing a different color and style on Building One. The applicant was granted two waivers on building one pursuant to Resolution 18, 2007, which allows the two principal tenant signs above the first floor. However, the applicant is proposing the signs on building one be green, while the signs on building two and three are bronze. The tenant signs on building two and three will maintain the same color (bronze), but the applicant is also requesting an allowance for different styles or fonts. (Please see waiver table). Suite numbers are located in an acceptable location in accordance with the City's GIS Manager and Police Department. The building address numbers will be backlit in accordance to Police Department policy, addressing building identification at night. [This space is intentionally left blank] is Date Prepared: July 9, 2007 Meeting Date: July 24, 2007 WAIVERS (1) Staff supports the waiver to allow two different sign colors within the development. The applicant is proposing a green sign color for both principal tenant signs on the Thies Building (building one). The applicant is also proposing wall signs for building two and Three to be bronze. Since the signs are part of a uniform signage program and the two colors are consistent with the architecture of the buildings, staff finds that the variety of is color of the Thies signs with the signs on building two and three will not detract from the aesthetics of the architectural elevations. The difference in color is between the Thies building and the overall color of the tenant signs on building two and three and staff believes it may help distinguish the primary tenant of the PUD with primary frontage on I- 95 with the smaller tenants facing Riverside Drive. The appearance of the site from the Riverside Drive right of way is not affected by the variety of colors, as the Thies signs are facing I -95 and internal parking. Staff recommends approval. (2) Staff supports the waiver to allow a variety of styles on building three of the principal and tenant signs allowed per City Code Section 78 -285. Staff finds that the variety of font styles of the tenant signs on building two and three will not detract from the aesthetics of the architectural elevations. The individual tenant signage is not directly fronting or facing the Riverside Drive right -of -way and is partially internal to the site, with only limited visibility from the right -of -way. Staff recommends approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Petition MISC- 07 -05- 000030 without conditions of approval. 40 4 Uniform type, color, Different Color material, shape and and style within No Yes (1) Permitted Signage style development Sec. 78 -285 (Table 24) Uniform type, color, Different style material, shape and on building No Yes (2) style three (1) Staff supports the waiver to allow two different sign colors within the development. The applicant is proposing a green sign color for both principal tenant signs on the Thies Building (building one). The applicant is also proposing wall signs for building two and Three to be bronze. Since the signs are part of a uniform signage program and the two colors are consistent with the architecture of the buildings, staff finds that the variety of is color of the Thies signs with the signs on building two and three will not detract from the aesthetics of the architectural elevations. The difference in color is between the Thies building and the overall color of the tenant signs on building two and three and staff believes it may help distinguish the primary tenant of the PUD with primary frontage on I- 95 with the smaller tenants facing Riverside Drive. The appearance of the site from the Riverside Drive right of way is not affected by the variety of colors, as the Thies signs are facing I -95 and internal parking. Staff recommends approval. (2) Staff supports the waiver to allow a variety of styles on building three of the principal and tenant signs allowed per City Code Section 78 -285. Staff finds that the variety of font styles of the tenant signs on building two and three will not detract from the aesthetics of the architectural elevations. The individual tenant signage is not directly fronting or facing the Riverside Drive right -of -way and is partially internal to the site, with only limited visibility from the right -of -way. Staff recommends approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Petition MISC- 07 -05- 000030 without conditions of approval. 40 4 Cotleur& =Hearing 1934 Commerce Lane - Suite 1 • Jupiter, Florida • Mr. Stephen Mayer, Senior Planner City of Palm Beach Gardens Growth Management Department 10500 North Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 1- d <c PuteiturF ILandPlannei' 11 (-)!,1 1 t_;i __- I-,_ „It..I,T 33458 • Ph 561-747.6336 • Fax 561.747.1377 • Lic. #LC- C000239 June 15, 2007 Re: Miscellaneous Petition Application for Signage Re- submittal Packets CH #05 -1220 Dear Stephen: On behalf of the Applicant, we are pleased to provide you with eight (8) sets of the revised Miscellaneous Petition Applications for Signage (Master Sign Program) associated with the proposed Flex- Industrial Use development known as Gardens Commerce Center. The Applicant has included color copies of the principal signage for each building and an analysis of the 70% maximum sign area requirement for these signs, as well as ancillary documentation as provided in the attached re- submittal packets. These items have been revised to address additional comments in your 05 -15 -07 correspondence. Included for your re- review are the following: • Color sign packet • Sign area calculation graphics • Justification Statement with area calculations and sign verbiage (w/ one waiver request) • Written Sign Specification for typical tenant signage • On behalf of the Applicant and the design team we are looking forward to Staff's continued review of this plan and moving ahead to the Planning and Zoning Board of Appeals. Please contact us should you require any additional information or should you require clarification of any materials submitted herein. Sincerely, Brian Che uis, S nior Land Planner Cotleur & He ft, Inc. Enclosure: See above cc: Glenn Straub / Dan Cecil / Don Hearing l �j F: \Project Documents \05 -1220 RIVERSIDE DRIVE INDUSTRIAL PARCEL - STRAUB \MISCPet- Signage \CoverLtr 6- 15- 07.doc ow � AA C, �_J History: Brian, "Stephen Mayer" To "Brian Cheguis" <bcheguis @colleur - hearing.com> <smayer @pbgfl.com> cc "Ryan Johnston" <rohnston @johnstongroupinc.com> 05/15/2007 02:46 PM bcc Subject Gardens Commerce Center Master Signage petition a This message has been forwarded. We have the following comments: 1) There is no address displayed on any of the external building drawings. Please denote where the addresses will be located and the size of the numbers 2) The white vinyl address numbers are displayed but without a size notation. Please add the size of the numbers for review. (page 5 and 6 of GCC sign criteria) 3) Staff recommends removing "THE" or relocating "THE" to the second line of copy on "The Gardens Commerce Center" sign on the east elevation of building three, or request a waiver for having over two lines of copy. Alternatively, you may request a waiver to allow a third principal sign that may have three lines of copy. Staff recommends removing the third line of copy, in order to limit the number of waivers. 4) Staff notes that the master signage program shall have a uniform type, color, material, shape and style. The signage proposed has two different colors and letter styles. Staff recommends choosing a uniform color and style, or request a waiver to allow the different colors and styles. Again, staff recommends limiting the number of waiver requests 5) The illustration on page 4 of the GCC sign criteria shows two signs per entrance tower, but it does not indicate that the entrances are for two separate tenant bays. Please illustrate that the flat/wall signs for ground floor owner /lessees shall be limited to one sign per tenant space or bay. Staff just wants to make sure this is clear to a reader of the master signage plan without having to refer to the site plan. If you have any questions, please give me a call, Sincerely, Stephen Mayer Senior Planner Long Range Planning City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida (561) 799 -4217 office (561) 662 -3346 cell (561) 799 -4281 fax CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS E -MAIL DISCLAIMER: Please note: Florida has a very broad public records law. Most written communications to or from local officials regarding city business are public records available to the public and media upon request. Your e -mail communications may therefore be subject to public disclosure. Cotleum Hearing 1934 Commerce Lane • Suite 1 • Jupiter, Florida • • 40 33458 Ph 561.747.6336 Fax 561.747.1377 Lic. #LC- C000239 The Gardens Commerce Center Miscellaneous Petition for Master Sign Program Monday May 07, 2007 Revised June 15, 2007 Introduction Pishon Partners LLC, the applicant, is seeking approval for a Miscellaneous Petition request for the Master Sign Program for The Gardens Commerce Center site. The project was approved by City Council on March 01, 2007 by way of Resolution 18 -2007. As part of Resolution 18 -2007, two waivers were approved related to the signage. The first, Section 3 — 3 of the resolution, allows for two signs to be located above the second -floor line. The second, Section 3 — 4 of the resolution, allows for one additional principal tenant sign. An additional waiver is also being requested to allow for a variety of font styles to be utilized on the tenant signage. The Applicant is requesting this item be expedited through the process for final consideration by Staff, the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board, and City Commission. Specific Requests and Fees Miscellaneous Petition (Base Fee) $1,500.00 Total Fees $1.500.00 Project Contact Cotleur & Hearing, Inc. Donaldson Hearing / Brian Cheguis 1934 Commerce Lane, Suite 1 Jupiter, FL 33458 (561) 747 -6336 (561) 747 -1377 bcheguis cotleur- hearing.com Justification The Petitioner is proposing a mix of sign typologies for the various stand -along users and for the general tenants within the multi- tenant buildings. The Gardens Commerce Center Sign Criteria package (attached herein) was submitted with the original site plan and reviewed by Staff at that time and was found to be in compliance with the standards outlined in Section 78 -285 of the City's LDRs. The principal tenant signage meets the area requirements as established by Section 78 -285 and as presented below: V. STATUS REQUEST TEXT WIDTH HEIGHT AREA PERCENT North Proposed New Sign "PROTECH Radiation Safety Products" 21.5' 7.2' 155 S.F. 22% South Proposed New Sign "THIES DISTRIBUTING" 11.38' 6.58' 75 S.F. 13% East Proposed New Sign "THE GARDENS COMMERCE CENTER" 18.41' 5.83 107 S.F. 15% West Proposed New Sign "THIES DISTRIBUTING" 14.12' 4.08' 58 S.F. 2% The individual tenant's signage is proposed to be located above each respective tenant's doorway. This signage will be limited to one wall sign per tenant. Tenant signage will be of consistent color and material. The applicant is, however, requesting the following waiver to allow for these tenant signs to be designed with a variety of font styles: Waiver Request — Flat /Wall Sign Font Specific Waiver Request Per Section 78 -285 Table 24 Permanent Signs WAIVER APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT! PROPOSED DEVIATION REQUEST CODE ALLOWANCE SECTION Wall Signs Sec. 78 -285 Uniform type, color Variety of font More than one (1) for Ground Table 24 material, shape & styles font style for interior Floor style ground floor tenant Tenants signage •The applicant is requesting a waiver to allow for a variety of font styles on the FlatNVall Signs for ground floor user tenants. This waiver would allow for each tenant to have the flexibility of designing and utilizing individualized fonts in their signage and provide variety within the development. The material and color of each tenant sign will remain uniform throughout the project and shall be the unifying characteristic on the signage. This waiver is justifiable in that these tenant signs are internal to the project and will not be seen by the residential development to the south across the canal or from the Riverside Drive. The request allows for visual interest for patrons and visitors to the site and adds an element of character and individualization for each respective tenant. Due to the internalization of these signs it will not have any external impacts to surrounding properties. Conclusion The request for approval of the Master Sign Program for The Gardens Commerce Center is consistent with the City's Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan of Palm Beach Gardens. The proposed new signage will not create negative visual impacts on or off -site. The petitioner believes that premier tenant occupancy is directly tied to their ability to have clear identification of their facilities to the general public. The petitioner shall work closely with Staff to ensure they have all the necessary information and material to review and recommend approval of this request. • 2 F: \Project Documents \05 -1220 RIVERSIDE DRIVE INDUSTRIAL PARCEL - STRAUB\MISCPet- Signage \051220 Justification State Rev 061507.doc The Gardens Commerce Center Sign Criteria Intent and Purpose The purpose of this declaration is to specify sign and visual issues relative to this development. The Ooject is located within the city of Palm Beach Gardens and is subject to the rules and specifications f its sign ordinance. At no time shall the sign and visual guidelines for this development contradict or be in violation of the Palm Beach Gardens sign regulations. OWNER/LESSEE IDENTIFICATION The following establishes a uniform policy for all Owner /lessee Identification. SIGNS: The Owner /lessee shall not affix or display any signs, pictures, lettering advertisements, awnings or merchandise on any interior or exterior glass door or window, or on any other exterior portion of the leased premises, including adjacent grounds, without the prior written consent of the Property Owner /lessee's Association (POA). Owner /lessee shall bear the cost of removing any of its signs and the costs of any damage caused by such removal. Any and all signs to be located on the exterior doors, walls, glass or anywhere else on the property or on the owned premises shall be purchased by the POA and paid for by the Owner /lessee. A. PROPERTY OWNER/LESSEE'S ASSOCIATION (POA) APPROVAL 1. Owner /lessee's primary identification shall be manufactured by the sign company selected and approved by the POA. 2. No sign shall be manufactured or installed without prior approval in writing by the POA. 3. 3 copies of sign drawings are to be submitted to Property Manager. One (1) approved copy will be returned to Owner /lessee with any necessary modifications indicated by the POA. One is to be given to sign company by the POA. One will be retained by the POA. Submission to include: I. Drawings to scale is2. Illustrated construction specifications 4. Owner /lessee's failure to comply with the POA- approved sign design and location may result (at POA's sole discretion) in Owner /lessee's bearing the cost of sign relocation, remanufacture, replacement or any such repairs deemed necessary by the POA. 5. POA has assigned to each Owner /lessee, specific sign locations. 6. Typeface style is restricted and subject to the POA approval prior to any fabrication. Use of Logo - marks on primary identification signs is subject to the sole and absolute discretion of the POA. 7. All sign displays are to be centered within the appropriate sign surface assigned allowing adequate space from borders. 8. Signs or hanging plaques on windows, mullions or doors other than those specifically assigned and outlined herein are not permitted. 9. No advertising placards, banners, pennants or other temporary materials shall be fixed to any part of the building or located on any common area. 10. All signs, colors and other designs are subject to the POA's written approval at the POA's sole and absolute discretion prior to fabrication. 11. All installations, repairs and fabrications to be by licensed and insured sign contractors using industry accepted material and workmanship with approvals and permits from the appropriate government agency. • 12. POA reserves the right to alter these specifications or make exceptions from time to time. Page 2 B. Signage Opportunities • 1. Each Owner /lessee is permitted three signage opportunities, subject to government approvals. i) Primary identification ii) Storefront entry door and rear entry door signage Bi. Primary Identification 1. Each Owner /lessee is required to install and continuously maintain a primary identification sign. 2. Primary identification signs will be compised of solid letters in bronze color to match mullions. 3. All primary identification signage will be of uniform materials and color as determined and approved by the POA. 4. No primary identification signage will have lettering greater than 24 inches in height for a single line of copy or more than two lines of copy on the designated sign sign area. • Sign letter are not illuminated except by general illumination provided by POA. • Sign is for Owner /lessee identification purposes only. • No more than one name or message may be included. • Cost to create, install and maintain these signs is Owner /lessee's responsibility. • Cost to remove, restore and repair sign area upon vacating to the POA's satisfaction is Owner /lessee's responsibility. 5. Letters will be applied to wall in a designated location centered in area above allotted, above the doorway as per the attached illustration. 6. All primary identification signage will be located no higher than second floor. • 7. Cabinet signs are prohibited. 8. Owner /lessee shall be entitled to one (1) primary identification sign occupying no more than 5 % of the area of the elevation. Bii. Storefront Signage Window signs are not allowed in The Gardens Commerce Center. 2. Only entry door signage is allowed and is limited to no more than the lesser of 100 sq.ft. or 20% of the gross glass area. 3. Each Owner /lessee will be allowed the following lettering in white vinyl on the entrance door only (see depiction, approximately 5' above bottom of door). • Owner /lessee business name, letters no more than 4" in height or two lines of copy. • Owner /lessees phone number and web address, letter no more than 3" in height • Hours of operation, letters no more than 2" in height • All of the above shall be centered vertically on door 4. Security service identification may be installed not to exceed 2" in height or two lines of copy. 5. Rear door signage to be self- adhesive vinyl lettering, bronze in color centered horizontally on rear door (not on overhead rolldown door). Name of business and phone number only. Center signage vertically at 5' above bottom of door. 6. All storefront & rear entry door signage will be provided at Owner /lessee's expense. • 7. The POA will grant exceptions or consider variations in storefront signage on an individual basis. P?ige 4 Example of Flat/Wall Signs for Owner/lessees: • Solid letters of composite material finished in bronze color to match mullions Letters are no more than 24" high and no more than two lines of copy Note: No more than one flat /wall sign shall be permitted per tenant space or bay. In the event a tenant occupies two bays with one entrance tower for their entrance, then the tenant shall be entitled to center their sign within such entrance tower. • P Igc 5 Example of Storefront Entry • All lettering in white vinyl 5 foot • • Door Sign: Supplied by POA No more than 4" in height, one line of copy No more than 4" in height or more than two lines of copy No more than 3" in height No more than 2" in height or three lines of copy No more than 2" in height or two lines of copy Page 6 *ample of Owner/lessee's Rear Entry Door Signage • Supplied by POA No more than 4" in height, one line of copy No more than 4" in height or more than two lines of copy All letters bronze color to match mullions No more than 2" in height or two lines of copy A- 18 DAvis LABORATORY Safetyco Alarm 561 -555 -1212 Supplied by POA No more than 4" in height, one line of copy No more than 4" in height or more than two lines of copy All letters bronze color to match mullions No more than 2" in height or two lines of copy Page 7 4RXample of Front is Entry Door Signage with FOR SALE OR FOR LEASE SIGN installed Specifications: Sign size limited to no larger than 18 inches by eighteen inches, white background, black letters only. Three lines of copy only, typeface is Kabal Bold comprised of the words: FOR SALE or FOR • LEASE on two lines and the phone number on one line. Date Prepared: January 25, 2007 •1 RESOLUTION 18, 2007 2 3 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM 5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA APPROVING THE GARDENS 6 COMMERCE CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) TO 7 ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF THREE BUILDINGS CONSISTING 8 OF 41,577 SQUARE FEET OF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL USE AND 9 27,718 SQUARE FEET OF ACCESSORY PROFESSIONAL OFFICE 10 USE ON A 4.45 -ACRE PARCEL, AS DESCRIBED MORE 11 PARTICULARLY HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR WAIVERS; PROVIDING 12 FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND PROVIDING AN 13 EFFECTIVE DATE. 14 15 16 WHEREAS, the City Council, as the governing body of the City of Palm Beach 17 Gardens, Florida, pursuant to the authority in Chapter 163 and Chapter 166, Florida 18 Statutes, and the City's Land Development Regulations, is authorized and empowered 19 to consider petitions related to zoning and land development orders; and 20 21 WHEREAS, the City received a request from Ryan Johnston of the Johnston 22 Group Land Development Consultants, Inc., on behalf of Riverside Development, LLC, 4W2_ 3 for an approval of the Gardens Commerce Center Planned Unit Development (PUD) to 4 allow for the development of three buildings consisting of 41,577 square feet of light 25 industrial use and 27,718 square feet of accessory professional office use on a 4.45- 26 acre parcel, which is located on the west side of Riverside Drive, east of Interstate 95, 27 north of Plat 5, and approximately 300 feet south of Burns Road, as more particularly 28 described herein; and 29 30 WHEREAS, the subject site has been rezoned by Ordinance 7, 2007 to a 31 Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay with an underlying zoning of Light Industrial 32 (M -1A). The subject site has a future land -use designation of Industrial (1); and 33 34 WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application, 35 has determined that it is sufficient, and has recommended its approval; and 36 37 WHEREAS, the Business Development Board and the City's Economic 38 Development Manager have endorsed the Gardens Commerce Center project as part 39 of the Targeted Expedited Permitting Process (TEPP); and 40 41 WHEREAS, the Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board reviewed said petition at 42 its January 23, 2007, public hearing and recommended its approval by a vote of 7 -0; 43 and 44 A • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 •23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 •45 Date Prepared. January 25, 2007 Resolution 18, 2007 WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the evidence and testimony presented by the Applicant and other interested parties and the recommendations of the various City of Palm Beach Gardens review agencies and staff; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that adoption of this Resolution is in the best interests of the citizens and residents of the City of Palm Beach Gardens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA that: SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and ratified. SECTION 2. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment application of Ryan Johnston of the Johnston Group Land Development Consultants, Inc., on behalf of Riverside Development, LLC, for an approval of the Gardens Commerce Center Planned Unit Development (PUD), to allow for the development of three buildings consisting of 41,577 square feet of light industrial use and 27,718 square feet of accessory professional office use on a 4.45 -acre out parcel, which is located on the west side of Riverside Drive, east of Interstate 95, north of Plat 5, and approximately 300 feet south of Burns Road, subject to the conditions of approval contained herein, which are in addition to the general requirements otherwise provided by ordinance: LEGAL DESCRIPTION GARDENS COMMERCE CENTER BEGINNING THE QUARTER CORNER ON THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN NORTH 89 057'00" EAST, ALONG THE EAST -WEST QUARTER SECTION LINE A DISTANCE OF 619.62 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID QUARTER SECTION LINE AND THE CENTER -LINE OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE; THENCE SOUTH 10 033'45" EAST ALONG THE CENTER -LINE OF SAID RIVERSIDE DRIVE A DISTANCE OF 236.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG THE CENTER -LINE OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE AS SAID CENTER- LINE FORMS A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 512.28 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 11025'48" A DISTANCE OF 102.20 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 °57'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 32.20 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 89 °57'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 511.90 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF 1 -95; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF 1 -95, WHICH DESCRIBES A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 3969.83 FEET HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01027'54" A DISTANCE OF 101.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY OF THE CURVE; THENCE SOUTH 00 °13'45" WEST ALONG THE WEST RIGHT -OF -WAY 2 Date Prepared: January 25, 2007 Resolution 18, 2007 • 1 LINE OF 1 -95 A DISTANCE OF 179.95 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST 2 RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF 1 -95 WITH THE NORTH RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF 3 THOMPSON RIVER AS SHOWN ON PLAT NO. 5 OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH 4 GARDENS, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 27, PAGE 95, PUBLIC RECORDS OF 5 PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 89 047'45" EAST ALONG SAID 6 NORTH RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 248.53 FEET TO THE POINT OF 7 CURVATURE OF THE NORTH RIGHT- OF -WAY LINE OF THOMPSON RIVER; 8 THENCE ALONG THE SAID RIGHT- OF -WAY LINE WHICH DESCRIBES A CURVE 9 CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1564.34 FEET THROUGH 10 A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23 022'02" A DISTANCE OF 637.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 11 33 053'49" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE 12 NORTHWEST RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF BUCKEYE STREET A DISTANCE OF 43.91 13 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF RIVERSIDE DRIVE; 14 THENCE NORTH 56 006'11" WEST, ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE A DISTANCE 15 OF 212.66 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE; 16 THENCE CONTINUE ALONG THE SAID SOUTHWESTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY 17 WHICH DESCRIBES A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A 18 RADIUS OF 542.28 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 35 022'55" A 19 DISTANCE OF 334.87 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL BEING THE 20 NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 42 21 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST. 22 W3 CONTAINING 69,295 SQUARE FEET OR 4.45 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 24 25 SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 26 hereby approves the following six (6) waivers: 27 28 1. Section 78- 151(d), Setbacks adjacent to residential zoning districts, to allow 29 a 65.1 foot setback adjacent to the residentially zoned Thompson River. 30 31 2. Section 78- 306(d), Landscape buffer /utility easement encroachment, to 32 allow an additional 10 feet of encroachment on the west property line and 2 33 feet of encroachment on the south property line. 34 35 3. Section 78 -285, Permitted signs, to allow for two signs located above the 36 second -floor line. 37 38 4. Section 78 -285, Permitted signs, to allow for one additional principal tenant 39 sign. 40 41 5. Section 78- 508(b), Separation of driveways, to allow a proposed driveway 42 that has a 102 -foot separation from an existing driveway. 43 44 6. Section 78 -427, Timing of plat recordation, to allow the plat to be approved 45 prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. • 3 Dale Prepared: January 25, 2007 Resolution 18, 2007 • 1 SECTION 4. This approval is subject to the following conditions, which shall be 2 the responsibility of the Applicant, its successors, or assigns: 3 4 Planning and Zoning 5 6 1. In addition to the uses prohibited in Section 78 -159, Permitted, Conditional, 7 and Prohibited Use Chart for the Light Industrial zoning district, the 8 following uses shall also be prohibited: "Automobile Repair, General," "Auto 9 Service Station and Minor Repairs," "Motorcycle Sales and Service," 10 Auto/Truck Body Repair Shop," and "Boat Repair". (Planning & Zoning) 11 12 2. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant shall post 13 escrow or make payment in lieu for Art in Public Places in accordance with 14 the City Code. If the Applicant is proposing art on site, an application for 15 art approval shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the first building 16 permit for vertical construction, and the art shall be approved prior to the 17 issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. If the art is not approved 18 prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the City shall 19 have the option of withdrawing the escrow. (Planning & Zoning) 20 21 3. At no time shall staging of construction vehicles and/or service vehicles 22 occur within a public right -of -way. (Planning & Zoning) • 4 •23 24 4. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for vertical construction, the 25 Applicant shall install a six -foot tall construction fence with a privacy tarp 26 around south, east, and north property lines. (Planning & Zoning) 27 28 5. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for signage, the Applicant shall 29 submit a master signage program for the City Council's review and approval. 30 (Planning & Zoning) 31 32 6. All on -site lighting shall be cast downward and shielded from adjacent 33 residential properties. This includes any interior building lights within building 34 three. (Planning & Zoning) 35 36 7. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, all on -site lighting 37 shall be installed and consist of metal halide or equivalent lighting approved by 38 the Police Department. (Planning & Zoning) 39 40 8. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for each building, each 41 building shall screen all roof mechanical equipment from view. This 42 includes views from 1 -95 and consists of a horizontal line of sight. 43 (Planning & Zoning) 44 45 • 4 5 Date Prepared: January 25, 2007 Resolution 18, 2007 • 1 9. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant 2 shall submit the property owners association documents for the City 3 Attorney's review and approval. These property owners association 4 documents shall reflect unity of control for all common areas within the 5 PUD, including, but not limited to, parking, landscaping, and drive aisles. 6 (Planning & Zoning, City Attorney) 7 8 10. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for vertical construction, the 9 Applicant shall submit a plat for review. Prior to the issuance of the first 10 Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall have a plat for the subject 11 property approved by the City Council. No conveyance of any portion of 12 the property shall occur prior to Council approval of the plat. (Planning & 13 Zoning) 14 15 11. The permitted uses shall consist of light industrial (41,577 square feet) and 16 accessory professional office (27,718 square feet). The on -site accessory 17 professional office uses shall not exceed 27,718 square feet, unless a 18 traffic impact analysis is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and 19 Palm Beach County; and adequate parking is provided for, consistent with 20 the City Code. (Planning & Zoning) 21 22 12. The Applicant shall submit a tabular summary that includes each tenant •23 and the square footages for all uses on site. This summary shall be 24 updated and submitted each time an interior tenant renovation permit and 25 occupational license are submitted to the City for review and approval. 26 (Planning & Zoning) 27 28 City Engineer 29 30 13. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, a public access 31 easement shall be granted for all public sidewalks within the property 32 boundary. (City Engineer) 33 34 14. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land 35 alteration permit, the Applicant shall provide written authorization from the 36 appropriate utility companies (easement holders) allowing landscaping 37 within their respective existing and /or proposed easements. (City 38 Engineer) 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 • 5 9 Date Prepared. January 25, 2007 Resolution 18, 2007 • 1 15. Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the Applicant shall 2 provide a cost estimate for public infrastructure, landscaping, and irrigation. 3 The cost estimate shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and 4 landscape architect registered in the State of Florida. The cost estimate 5 shall be based on 110% of the total combined approved cost estimates and 6 shall be posted with the City prior to the issuance of the first building 7 permit. (City Engineer) 8 9 16. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land 10 alteration permit, the Applicant shall provide cost estimates in accordance 11 with LDR Sections 78 -309 and 78 -461 and for on -site project 12 improvements, not including public infrastructure, or landscaping and 13 irrigation costs for review and approval by the City. The cost estimates 14 shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and landscape architect 15 registered in the State of Florida and shall be posted with the City prior to 16 the issuance of the first land alteration permit. (City Engineer) 17 18 17. The Applicant shall comply with all Federal Environmental Protection 19 Agency and State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection permit 20 requirements for construction activities. (City Engineer) 21 22 18. Prior to construction plan approval, the Applicant shall schedule a pre - •23 permit meeting with City staff. (City Engineer) 24 25 19, The Applicant shall furnish to the City copies of all complete permit 26 applications, certifications, and approvals for the project to and from all 27 regulatory agencies. (City Engineer) 28 29 20. Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the Applicant shall 30 submit signed, sealed, and dated construction plans (paving, grading & 31 drainage, and water & sewer) and all pertinent calculations for review and 32 comment. (City Engineer) 33 34 21. The construction, operation, and /or maintenance of any elements of the 35 subject project shall not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage 36 of surrounding areas. If at any time during the project development it is 37 determined by the City that any of the surrounding areas are experiencing 38 negative drainage impacts caused by the project, it shall be the Applicant's 39 responsibility to cure said impacts in a period of time and a manner 40 acceptable to the City prior to additional construction activities. (City 41 Engineer) 42 43 22. The Applicant shall provide all necessary construction zone signage and 44 fencing as required by the City Engineer. (City Engineer) • 45 9 7 Date Prepared: January 25, 2007 Resolution 18, 2007 • 1 23. The build -out date for Gardens Commerce Center shall be December 31, 2 2008, unless extended per City Code Section 78 -61. (City Engineer) 3 4 City Forester 5 6 24. The Applicant shall coordinate and receive approval from the Growth 7 Management Administrator prior to the closing of any public sidewalk. (City 8 Forester) 9 25. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant 10 shall install all required buffer plantings in accordance with the approved 11 landscape plan. (City Forester) 12 13 26. Prior to the issuance of any land alteration permits, the Applicant shall 14 provide the City with the opportunity to remove and utilize for public use 15 any vegetation which will not be used in the future landscaping on the site. 16 (City Forester) 17 18 27. A public access easement along Riverside Drive shall be dedicated on the 19 plat, and the maintenance and utility easement on the south property line 20 shall be vacated on the plat. (City Forester) 21 22 28. Prior to the first land alteration permit, funds shall be placed in escrow or a 024 3 surety bond provided for an amount equal to 110% of the estimated cost for landscaping. (City Forester) 25 26 29. Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall be 27 responsible for installing landscaping and irrigation along the Riverside 28 Drive right -of -way road shoulder adjacent to the property in accordance 29 with the approved landscape plan. (City Forester) 30 31 30. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the landscaping and 32 irrigation along Riverside Drive right -of -way road shoulder adjacent to the 33 property. (City Forester) 34 35 Seacoast Utilities 36 37 31. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant shall provide a 38 30 -foot wide easement between the 1 -95 right -of -way and Building one, 39 south to the change in direction of the sewer line. (SUA) 40 41 32. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant shall apply for 42 the proper permits to relocate the sewer line. (SUA) 43 44 33. The Applicant shall provide vehicular access for Seacoast Utilities over the •45 sewer line adjacent to 1 -95 right -of -way. (SUA) 7 0 45 Date Prepared: January 25, 2007 Resolution 18, 2007 • 1 2 Police Department 3 34. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, lighting locations 4 and building addresses shall not conflict with landscaping, including long - 5 term tree canopy growth. (Police Department) 6 7 35. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant 8 shall provide a timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting above or 9 near entryways and adjacent sidewalks. (Police Department) 10 11 36. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant shall provide a 12 street address system depicting street names and numerical addresses for 13 emergency response purposes. Address system depiction shall be in 8.5" x 14 11" map format. (Police Department) 15 16 37. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant shall submit a 17 construction site security and management plan for review and approval by 18 the Police Department. Non - compliance with the approved security and 19 management plan may result in a stop -work order for all construction 20 activities. (Police Department) 21 22 38. Prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for each building, the •23 numerical address shall be placed on the front elevation. Each numerical 24 address shall be illuminated for nighttime visibility, shall provide bi- 25 directional visibility from the roadway (when applicable), shall consist of 8 26 inches in height, and shall be a different color than the color of the surface 27 to which they are attached. (Police Department) 28 29 Miscellaneous 30 31 39. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, digital files of the 32 approved plat shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Division, and 33 approved civil design and architectural drawings, including floor plans, shall be 34 submitted prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. (GIS 35 Manager, Development Compliance Officer) 36 37 40. The Applicant shall notify the City's Public Works Division via fax at least 38 10 working days prior to the commencement of any work /construction 39 activity within any public right -of -way within the City of Palm Beach 40 Gardens. In the case of a City right -of -way, the Applicant has at least five 41 working days to obtain a right -of -way permit. Right -of -way permits may be 42 obtained at the Building Division. Failure to comply with this condition 43 could result in a stop -work order of all work /construction activity within the 44 public right -of -way and the subject development site. (Public Works) 0 45 Date Prepared: January 25, 2007 Resolution 18, 2007 •1 SECTION 5. This Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment approval shall 2 be constructed in compliance with the following plans on file with the City's Growth 3 Management Department: 4 5 1. Gardens Commerce Center Site Plans and Detail Plans, Sheets 1 through 6 4 of 6, by Cotleur and Hearing, Inc., last revised on January 25, 2007, and 7 received and stamped by the City on January 26, 2007. 8 9 2. Gardens Commerce Center Landscape Plans, Sheets 5 through 6 of 6, by 10 Cotleur and Hearing, Inc., last revised on January 25, 2007, and received 11 and stamped by the City on January 26, 2007. 12 13 3. Gardens Commerce Center Architectural Elevations, Floor Plan, Roof Plan, 14 and Electrical Site Plan, Sheets A1.1.a, A1.1 b, A1.1 c, A1.2, A1.3a, A1.3b, 15 A3.1, A3.2, and A3.3 by Tercilla Courtemanche Architects, last revised on 16 January 25, 2007, and received and stamped by the City on January 26, 17 2007. 18 19 4. Gardens Commerce Center Photometric Plan, Sheet SL -1, by Cotleur and 20 Hearing, Inc., last revised on February 9, 2007, and received and stamped 21 by the City on February 13, 2007. 22 3 5. Gardens Commerce Center Boundary Survey, sheet RPBGI, by Lidberg 4 Land Surveying, Inc., last revised on December 15, 2006, and received and 25 stamped by the City on December 29, 2006. 26 27 SECTION 6. This approval shall be consistent with all representations made by 28 the Applicant or Applicant's agents at any workshop or public hearing. 29 30 SECTION 7. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. 31 32 33 (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank) 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 •45 E •1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 0 2 3 4 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 • Date Prepared: January 25, 2007 Resolution 18, 2007 PASSED AND ADOPTED this I J-F day of itikct.{tci , 2007. ATTEST: BY: , Patricia Snider, CMC, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY BY: Zn C nstine . atum, City Attorney VOTE: MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR BARNETT COUNCILMEMBER JABLIN COUNCILMEMBER LEVY COUNCILMEMBER VALECHE CITY OF PALM B U -YA Russo, Mayor AYE NAY ABSENT -Z G:\ attorney _share \RESOLUTIONS \gardens commerce center - reso 18 2007.doc 10 •=;I c2Z/- o � �i♦ m' N ,•��•. rn �, 0)300 w W � CD CID rn w00Z cn c t0 S (D — 0 -n 2 Z o m O CD o C a° � w W CA J N (J C y 1 M J O A01 C OCD a C7 C CD C7 CID 3 = FUH W 2 C CD w c w 3 N y V_1 O _ m CD ? O 0 CD W CD I� D N C CJ O � I� z 0 0 a W a Q —j 0 w MV) _0 N.� CID $ Z? CID C o 0 3 0 CA r n� ED �I� iTf --f cn rn z �°n C-) o � �i♦ m' N ,•��•. rn �, 0)300 w W � CD CID rn w00Z cn c t0 S (D — 0 -n 2 Z o m O CD o C a° � w W CA J N (J C y 1 M J O A01 C OCD a C7 C CD C7 CID 3 = FUH W 2 O w c w 3 N y m CD ? O A W CD I� D N C CJ O � I� z 0 a a W a Q —j 0 MV) _0 N.� CID $ Z? C a C o 0 3 0 Z 3y CID A < OCD a L CD C7 CID 3 W CD FUH W 2 — /11 T O�M. w S Fill N io L O a N y W d ? O A W CD I� N C CJ O � I� z a a M a Q —j CO CO W 18" 5'10" �O 16" 24„ M a a � 0 r) a < I 1 H N IT n r C: 0 M r+ .+ IT 4P rM z rM Mq I I` ao IM rM ;z Iy IM < O D N II n �. �� C ^ �� n °� C O SDI M o n S p r1 0 (D -i a y aC, c TI C 2 3 D 0 M D O O a C o o 0 o D n r O c= D a= Ll a a a +� W a n °T M o o �M N ai - N O `�° Da N o r r o z N o m a 3 XC (D C "O O N < — 3`,<3 3a3 �,v�x in ID (D Vt O I ?. N to ID J O r) v �' ID r d X 'yD W Lq (D rD 7 7 rrp r CO (D rD O (�D (D pp •+ W T a C r* J M > rp N N O v, A v �r-(D 0- a AN ;� Ili T f0 It �. C. T x �.D y a rD (D w a Ln .+ n in C c W X O rD n ((D a O . + D w LAJ O D 3 -0 Ul t1 w 3 -T, (D (D L I � I 1 d „z /LS,h£ p a ©Copynght 2006 This design ;engineering is to remain Atlas Sign Industries exclusive property until approved and accepted thru purchase by client named on drawing. No pad of design and or specifications maybe duplicated without written authorisation of Atlas Sign Industries. Cn to N_ m w c 3 N � N =r p T. N N D CD — 0 CD N 7 n o O O 7 n> m D N $ to $ C zI 0 0 cD Z s 3< 3 ° r DC w p �D 3O7 70 fi 1 rn m c75 a w � O O ,.�..:' N 1. N O rn y o o 3 0 w CD m 0 z cn 0 c co ? to — 0 -n Z o ° v oa °cFM ° W � cn J O 30 N ? t 1VD A N mCOD Cn to N_ O w c 3 N � N =r p .. N N D CD — O n o O n> 0 D N $ to $ C zI 0 0 1 CD Z s 3< 3 ° 2La C$ CID a N w a w Co 00 o �� C Co o J < CD N �✓ CD m � OO 3 CAD X17 m m m l 1 w O a CD o a� w �o m0 �;3c o o p � 161/2" LA Do C 0 r 0 O C n n N r1 a 3 Is c -n I�D Z ID a � ; � Z on ,fn 0 o �0 C n z to to N 7 M S— M M O < o w rc i' 0- rD rF n O N N Co 1 x -0 n a (D � W 0 w ro o o D r M to _� S 0 - N r (o -� `D (D ro 0 a c D Q N O K O Z,O„ J Z U 0 '{ S M < OI _ O a 0 0 ( �o 0 _ n LA P I 10 ISL rr ., t L C - ® Copyright 2006 This design I engineering is to remain Atlas Sign Industries exclusive property until approved and accepted thru purchase by client named on drawing. No part of design and or specifications maybe duplicated without wntan authorization of AUw Sign Industries. a N 41 =r p .. N N CD — O n o 0 cc s a C- a D a Co 00 o �� C Co o �o m0 �;3c o o p � 161/2" LA Do C 0 r 0 O C n n N r1 a 3 Is c -n I�D Z ID a � ; � Z on ,fn 0 o �0 C n z to to N 7 M S— M M O < o w rc i' 0- rD rF n O N N Co 1 x -0 n a (D � W 0 w ro o o D r M to _� S 0 - N r (o -� `D (D ro 0 a c D Q N O K O Z,O„ J Z U 0 '{ S M < OI _ O a 0 0 ( �o 0 _ n LA P I 10 ISL rr ., t L C - ® Copyright 2006 This design I engineering is to remain Atlas Sign Industries exclusive property until approved and accepted thru purchase by client named on drawing. No part of design and or specifications maybe duplicated without wntan authorization of AUw Sign Industries. C n c o w 3 c m CD D 0 W 0 (D 0 a Cr Q Z O O 0 3N cn cn < ,M 2 V7 mo ` Om D p M v .■■� z 0 D N 3 � W 0 0 M _ 0� MM m e G1 Y ■ D d 2 Ica O 4 y O O s C CD = 1 7 O fC O 3 0 V 1 O d N m Zc S O — z 0 O m s U D Cr Cn � N � C v N 0 0 co W r m � ➢ C �FM to m Z n D7 O J w (D rn W Z N O C 0=4 (D y N — O -= Z 5(p 0 o a° C� O Wwcn J W < a N A v O N ' m rn C n c o w 3 c m CD D 0 W 0 (D 0 a Cr Q Z O O 0 3N cn cn < ,M 2 V7 mo ` Om D p M v .■■� z 0 D N 3 � W 0 0 M _ 0� MM m e G1 Y ■ D VC O : r 3 o r c N O O B I ID n o m _ o (D a L 0 LA r17 c in ;°, Z O Q a a* c r D r�D i O � , • f1 S Y iiiID O Lt rD 7 ID in O 'D D — 3 E O0 rD n _ -3 ID Z-`_� a o c 3 m LA 3 O � o 3 (D Ln s r� W '* O 44 00 � C n Q (D 54' -0" 6' -0" En --Il m E r D m O z O rn � ti M � N C \ O \/I b m p C9 41'-4" Copyright 2006 This design / engineering is to remain Atlas Sign Industries exclusive property until approved and accepted thru purchase by client named on drawing. No part of design and or specifications maybe duplicated without written authorization of Atlas Sign Industries. d 2 Ica O 4 y O O s N = = 1 7 O fC O 3 s9 V 1 O d N m Zc S O — z 0 s U D Cr Cn � N � C v N VC O : r 3 o r c N O O B I ID n o m _ o (D a L 0 LA r17 c in ;°, Z O Q a a* c r D r�D i O � , • f1 S Y iiiID O Lt rD 7 ID in O 'D D — 3 E O0 rD n _ -3 ID Z-`_� a o c 3 m LA 3 O � o 3 (D Ln s r� W '* O 44 00 � C n Q (D 54' -0" 6' -0" En --Il m E r D m O z O rn � ti M � N C \ O \/I b m p C9 41'-4" Copyright 2006 This design / engineering is to remain Atlas Sign Industries exclusive property until approved and accepted thru purchase by client named on drawing. No part of design and or specifications maybe duplicated without written authorization of Atlas Sign Industries. T s o CD m m Wap 3 Cn� N W O d ID Z N O C (0 ? (D — o -n 2 Z 61, O Co 1 o a � C O N W J W — J N A a N A cn Cn 0 w c n C O 3 m (D D 0 d 18" 0 m� 3 °^ y D Z� o_0 w Q 0 m N x (D 0 A a CD `� 30 0' 3 �M9 v 1� 7 w 0 CDm Cn o a fv r 0 m CO c C N m 0 d 6 Iy a H t N l7 CO � ,w � O f = A 3 3 m n I C'! l� a Is Ca o o0 o O m N c rD Z3 3 rD CD ID W r D W o� � C�n d° FM --4 Cn- z T s o CD m m Wap 3 Cn� N W O d ID Z N O C (0 ? (D — o -n 2 Z 61, O Co 1 o a � C O N W J W — J N A a N A cn Cn 0 w c n C O 3 m (D D 0 d 18" 0 m� 3 °^ y D Z� o_0 w Q 0 m N 0 A a CD `� 30 X -� 3 �M9 v 1� 7 w 0 CDm Cn o a fv r r CO c C N m 0 d 6 Iy a H t CO � ,w � O f = A 3 3 m n I C'! l� a Is Ca o o0 o 18" O 2, M 010 °0 r r CO c C N X0 o a C 0 N c rD Z3 3 rD ID a kA v(D r �_ Q ""' Z rD „T O r.D r 0 C N n° 0 y 0 r) =°* Of m o :3 m m 1 N r N ID M • •• �, r 7 M (D 0 fn x r T. a� `D x� .. " • < 3 - x a n rD °c U Vo LA 0 � � 0 = I I � o C (D a (D n (.71 r. CO N o O n o 0- II a IT c c c x p rD d (D w N P M II I'D D = rD r � CO rD rD Z O i' a` 7 x — O p� V a a- n O rD o o rD O � a ;� 0 o � E- ro L 3 0 c ID M r* T Q rD 32'0' M d L m - -- -- r� 0 ° O 'a O CL n O 0 I. of cl�_ 0 N1 Q Copyright 2006 This design/ engiineenng is to remain Atlas Sign Industries exclusive property until approved and accepted thru purchase by client named on drawing. No pan of design and or specifications maybe duplicated wdhout written authorization of Atlas Sign Industries. Cn C7 C In (n O w 3 c m m D 0 d 0 3° Kn x& ~ N N &W Y (n tZ � U CD • lJ V V " ii7 3 CO CD n/ I�i1Ll ^\ LI Ll� LJ ZT w m 1I �FF7R� _ _t � v � o a �I DO 0 0 a 0 m CD 1p D n o � (nM (n rnn n -v �. s o f 1�.. MO o � J 07 W J w :E 3 cn m (D m W Z o 0 c W ?m — o -n Z a m O Co a° CrM o W cc --I w Q N A M J O N A IT1COj Cn C7 C In (n O w 3 c m m D 0 d 0 3° Kn x& ~ N N &W Y (n tZ � U CD • lJ V V " ii7 3 CO CD n/ I�i1Ll ^\ LI Ll� LJ ZT w m 1I �FF7R� _ _t � v � o a �I DO M S E o m a N 7 CO) Will 0 CID N m 3 O I� A O N C) O 3 ai F n co m — c+ z I� � o 3 4 n a a � � D> TO ° v 1 c ° 2' 7V6" �o o 00 ID � m 0 :E '° N 4A O LA A o c M- 'C F M a S N vi (D m C ii a Q I'D 0 r m 0 I'D 0 C Z o o CD CL c C �-1v F;, d = 0+ y CO t � b 0 m WN ((D m II' N ^ — P N O X � � X 7 a �j X S ,l N d F II 7 � arD � w 3 ; X O rD c C in d N �+ * I'D N O ff Da o -TI n ID CD N O * - O D C C Oo Q I'D a X ° o .C+ o O II m A \ D Ln N C 3 c a C C 3 m Z O S M m a O 7C 7 R. L I t�D aO °`� L A7 a a o o 3 I i f O = w Z E Copyright 2006 This design i engineering Is to remain Atlas Sign Industries exclusive property until approved and accepted thru purchase by client named on drawing. No part of design and or specaficaeons maybe duplicated wittwut written author --ion of Atlas Sign Industries. Cn c � N O 3 (D � D 0 w O ID 3 °^� �N D ZR a m N Q' (� `gym N o' CD U O. CD � D <' CD 3 m / � 7 it JJ (D co JJ (D a w co y c I� N N 7 N � cn N C V o' D C7 ° o A 3 ^ I� n ° d n (D W n o � (n M Z �+ n T • RIMINI W m rn � v � ►I 3 Cn� m wao rnp00Z w o c co ? (D — 0 -n = Z o !D O OD a ° C o Wwcn J w < d N A v O M cp A w m N c Cn c � N O 3 (D � D 0 w O ID 3 °^� �N D ZR a m N Q' (� `gym N 0 A � O CD U O. CD � D <' CD 3 m / � 7 it JJ (D co JJ :3 U cn T FR (�J a w co y c I� N N 7 N � cn N C V C7 ° o A 3 ^ I� n ° n ■ 16„ O IM, v D N o -0 c �, N o C O (D E �a a S N N ro 'V p rl (D —I a c T1 a rn = C � 0 0 ID 0 L Z 0 m C 0- 00a W r F L m o .. WN �m .. 11= N-�+ iv r N O %,D X (D ---, X 7 0) N X S O1 0 7 I �� 0- (D N W N W N W O (D Uj 0 N 0� N O (D Vn fL D o r�D a N p O �D C C 00 (D %C) CL x O o C O O II N 00 A � w �D a D to E n � c a C T 3 rD rD Z 0 ll M (D a O Q x CL COD /(9 ,Z S I I Ii I C W I A i i II Q Copyright 2006 This design engineering is to remain Atlas Sign Industres exclusive property until approved and accepted thru purchase by client named on drawing. No part of design and or specifications maybe duplicated without written author"bon of Atlas Sign Industries. 54' -0" 6'7" N O 105 /a" 3' /4" 2'0" O c o N 2 M M 10" r N m C -D-{ - a O � O rn 7 tA tt n 0 07 O �D r I'D M_ 2'0' I I A Q rn M z C tA i o .♦ M ~ � N p �■■■n ° C v D N O m�ooi0 r c LA O C � a 0 N a = n N rD n c N eD m H y r2 n v (D T w W _ rD 0 °7 °7 0 Ln (D D� � :N oTa o a a r n a d o 00 61 CD N M a o (a n n 3 v to 3 nfD n c �? m D 00 K� s W D o X -- - -- -- - -- N rn - c :� x W W 0 0 °. , v 00 W o rD o 00 0 n (71 ° II d rD D O m rD oo w O m 0000 X C •* N 7 �rD �V rD � W O n rt II o rD 00 :3 c o tD 3 0 _ X v 3 c o - 3 o 0 � LA rn c 0° d r) CD 0 D O (^' = O � N c a ro r�D N i z < v O; O; 00 r�m o y w D D m N rn R 3 . y _ m n 0 p z— n z n n z p O > m D O n D O n C m O 0 O rinX P n C D O Z. 0 .. z ~ C i 6A ti O 0 n 9 m C� tnn o g i y gN m Z-, m �D � p N Z S vo z o qn ^ 4 O D 25 0 2 CD 4 O 41'-4" IL Q Copyright 2006 This design I engineering is to remain Atlas Sign Industries exclusive property until approved and accepted thru purchase by client named on drawing. No part of design and or specifications maybe duplicated without written authorization of Atlas Sign Industries. cn � w c o 3 � co D m 0 0 N IIR MT z� 3 °-� ` `& L a 0 0 Om ` D p ° mm < v z (n m CD �W M �^ �C) _ M _ M _ ED r D� O m 307 37 IT M 0 D FF , 0, 0 J (P J `■�� O � w m rn a] z N O C o ?m — o -n 1: Z o m O o a° c� O W W N A a Zi h) O A p w N m CA 54' -0" 6'7" N O 105 /a" 3' /4" 2'0" O c o N 2 M M 10" r N m C -D-{ - a O � O rn 7 tA tt n 0 07 O �D r I'D M_ 2'0' I I A Q rn M z C tA i o .♦ M ~ � N p �■■■n ° C v D N O m�ooi0 r c LA O C � a 0 N a = n N rD n c N eD m H y r2 n v (D T w W _ rD 0 °7 °7 0 Ln (D D� � :N oTa o a a r n a d o 00 61 CD N M a o (a n n 3 v to 3 nfD n c �? m D 00 K� s W D o X -- - -- -- - -- N rn - c :� x W W 0 0 °. , v 00 W o rD o 00 0 n (71 ° II d rD D O m rD oo w O m 0000 X C •* N 7 �rD �V rD � W O n rt II o rD 00 :3 c o tD 3 0 _ X v 3 c o - 3 o 0 � LA rn c 0° d r) CD 0 D O (^' = O � N c a ro r�D N i z < v O; O; 00 r�m o y w D D m N rn R 3 . y _ m n 0 p z— n z n n z p O > m D O n D O n C m O 0 O rinX P n C D O Z. 0 .. z ~ C i 6A ti O 0 n 9 m C� tnn o g i y gN m Z-, m �D � p N Z S vo z o qn ^ 4 O D 25 0 2 CD 4 O 41'-4" IL Q Copyright 2006 This design I engineering is to remain Atlas Sign Industries exclusive property until approved and accepted thru purchase by client named on drawing. No part of design and or specifications maybe duplicated without written authorization of Atlas Sign Industries. cn � w c o 3 � co D 0 W IIR MT z� 3 °-� ` `& L a �m m A < , M z U) mO Om ` D p ° mm < v z (n m nD � O00 �W M �^ �C) _ M _ M _ M D C Mo mm m 0 D FF FF iw 0 - y W O J u O O CL O J O i3 CO V C1 O — Z ra c '� 'N a_ n an V cn V o + Q O CD 54' -0" 6'7" N O 105 /a" 3' /4" 2'0" O c o N 2 M M 10" r N m C -D-{ - a O � O rn 7 tA tt n 0 07 O �D r I'D M_ 2'0' I I A Q rn M z C tA i o .♦ M ~ � N p �■■■n ° C v D N O m�ooi0 r c LA O C � a 0 N a = n N rD n c N eD m H y r2 n v (D T w W _ rD 0 °7 °7 0 Ln (D D� � :N oTa o a a r n a d o 00 61 CD N M a o (a n n 3 v to 3 nfD n c �? m D 00 K� s W D o X -- - -- -- - -- N rn - c :� x W W 0 0 °. , v 00 W o rD o 00 0 n (71 ° II d rD D O m rD oo w O m 0000 X C •* N 7 �rD �V rD � W O n rt II o rD 00 :3 c o tD 3 0 _ X v 3 c o - 3 o 0 � LA rn c 0° d r) CD 0 D O (^' = O � N c a ro r�D N i z < v O; O; 00 r�m o y w D D m N rn R 3 . y _ m n 0 p z— n z n n z p O > m D O n D O n C m O 0 O rinX P n C D O Z. 0 .. z ~ C i 6A ti O 0 n 9 m C� tnn o g i y gN m Z-, m �D � p N Z S vo z o qn ^ 4 O D 25 0 2 CD 4 O 41'-4" IL Q Copyright 2006 This design I engineering is to remain Atlas Sign Industries exclusive property until approved and accepted thru purchase by client named on drawing. No part of design and or specifications maybe duplicated without written authorization of Atlas Sign Industries. Cn � (O N SU C O~ 3 N D m m O S Cl) o C', a (D T Z7�,' o0 0 Z 3°^� 3<° cD n to as N 7 A .Z7 G ,M = C/) mo m D W � 0 -13 C) MT � �n 0 M � W mD mom ;,Qz cn T Z D W r DC W r�i °M t Z-�z n Io O EcD N 0 J rn w cn wao (D CO m CO Z cn c tD ? m — o -n = Z om o a° C� W co cn -Ij J W < N ? Q D J O (p A w m N Cn Cn � (O N SU C O~ 3 N D 0 m 0 Cl) o C', a (D T Z7�,' o0 CF Z 3°^� 3<° =ti to as N A .Z7 G ,M = C/) mo m D W � z o =of m m z -13 C) MT � �n n= M � W mD mom ;,Qz cn T Z D FITQ _ Io tnn CO O m � O _ O 3 I � CD v rii F I� < � o I� n Q v lit cv 24„ X O ■ ■ ■ O FOD m v O D O r cn C n O r r r r ;0 W TI ;U O W D m m m m m(n mXD to M W T �f zcn m p m 0 m m m m m n c O 11 D Z � -n O D m Z cn A Ox m m D O D T x r m z C c? M N X n cn ��p m A —4 N m e x D = Z rn Cl) -i (.n C > IM O O II II --4 II o rn C D D E:: r- 0 -< F- CD m m 70 0 [� < n _ m O r m D D � x � M n czn>m z _ W m -n D m o 00 z Ooh r- 0 II n m w C m M z -� m � m m m N m ={ rn n p z m o ?gin rn W D Z A O m m n z m m II � m O ;'D r M z m r C m D o M z m zm M r- 0�Cn O< W *O X = r D Z r r D p m C yM M z r X r cn tA A A N 41' -4" 8'-4" M M M m D O z rn n ril o 'lei v � N C M 0 N Chi cn N N CO I w „l ,b ZO C O C O in D D Ag m - a O n C m0 D ZOO r= ZO n D Z () O gmmn yD D D 0 Z N i F:LI C p 0 m N R O y y % o Z o s z m A Z y O m D m m mm 90 n £ n O n r Z 8 m R 0 z 54' -0" o i l ° IL Q Copyright 2006 This design I engineering is to remain Alias Sign Industries exclusive property until approved and accepted thru purchase by client named on drawing. No part of design and or specifications maybe duplicated without written authorization of Atlas Sign Industries. 1 J V7 PGA Commons Petition MISC 07 -03- 000026 City of Palm Beach Gardens Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board July 24, 2007 �5� 1 _ S w J Banner Design • The proposed banners utilize a geometrical "butterfly" design, and incorporate the name PGA Commons onto the banner. � fl I tiy'mhyl PRD-1EG"r DATA - PAkri -L 1 I APE+. {IMKT 127P1•LKLkL . AAUlH PGA ties! [.iphling Ls1Cuti.3a4 P7MNCiir.'kc�'fl[t �Maer. RaT T9 d�Err r,ne er.l BHOPM[rw1L 1z1 W IF 1, SitiIIRAN MURF. UTps.e` R xst, rr 1 "MWMC]u 1PTAL PAOM.El SUMMA1%7 tN@Nl Mj!OjMNTtW rsrfc FAA MC H= I 1 MpCMPtC rv+rl '" 196 LOLDIXP sPICC4 Wavu xw5 TT b'CY9LC SFwrpr II III ++�r+�wnwcw ewoxaun svPpsmsw� -reAv 'OY"bmr. AREA AUMMAKT- .. iOTrMiPk[& 31 Dis. FMMIOr! AMA INLOUe9 F1Pl !1,771 0, 'IC 4NNPiA9 PARN;INQ 6UMMAR• _ PEN Rlnroy7 tDtk ... E= neap rs,e _"--- la 411141' 1p IY w �5 hl! uMlr g IA a ry K. a uNr ly w PAV PAhkIM6 5x1 4 TaTu A1':A TLTALS 0. TMIL UFPrCWrrTA1L IT 2M 8F. .. TLn'wmr. Agn BI.MSF.. 1+X0 AMC ]wig sr. !7594 ACh[51 L6'- iy9YCRAGC Frut.elNR 6 kAae 55. +ap pr 17 h 74R�IIVL1um are+. I'GA966 aP. N x Lwu nAaP� PIM1S�YA" eml PLRli[C{.8 ANEa KAM 5F ]• e ' mare wens QP[k 4Pa( ;c F41 WIlF£ o Py Nlnu LA-C d�lE_I1s1�L(x &pE �[ LE6ENNwIIr.'48 bU1CtIWG L! ®�- �rr.ya ra _ rurn la f "T J7, ...tsn rAw.a eu ly _�Av 54rX{TiW.r+l'•hreerrt ruriTaa.s `531M PON UG'hL rF7 r0 {f Pr1kwA..,�os - n +r•eAa� Pfl01RrJ wru sun �fif wr. r r.+en 9r�wP r+rie rM� gr61[ru. r+Y � �pyq NF��L L01 r1md 5�F t5�AAS }ealifU�•C4M1hID�d4f1 i44t. 0 VU YxL f+HNlm I ,t y IL an n. � I ,9 .7 'r I k T . 4 I� i1 ;� it `.� J ■� �Ir —' � �— X' ^J— . rtrt33 1 Outdoor 5ervire Aroa Qetall hTS �.7 . ------ 5 t' ,�4 ,T � I I I 1 I I i i f� I I . J. YT ' ]A L ^.SI Aix srn ri IN! +� 1mAit scrap Welty 9Mlae.'�4'slrriiSifK UrhR — xussR a+xxrt �s LE♦a utan oemm SKM Er;Jrl, 71=� Z7 Tp::.� M.-. PI.P il:4wl .1 AREA 7CITAI4 Al --m U Ilk %& !777 -- CANAL L---j "N k4 1-4 )A L. IAM AU Mp?x:1Duhm!ol Am, P.v; — A: PO MI'. ey FW<ND FINIgAfey ;rv, Rmm—isi'. 0-- PC il:4wl .1 AREA 7CITAI4 Al --m U Ilk %& !777 -- CANAL L---j "N k4 1-4 .A 0 II II ri 4a IIIA" ial m .A 0 II II ri 4a IIIA" ial 0: f 13 0 LJ -Y Ut 'W I IF. AD_ L PANI's. n !3ymbL'l I :. gh r i ng I .x:: i in I is v L II �x, L;iMENU ri LTI ri TCIM4ic,r �tmdmv LIMIDWE W�14G 4%j) l,T V .1 Au Al 4 1 4 —IMTA 1� .1 4 LM .,'mw lnA m !1ti -,mT UPA PIG- 19P AT KW V� z r 7 1 L SITE RM E:E%E- n-r-. 'j wlra di I SITE PLAN I I sp- PAKEL 3 - WEST N� V -Y Ut 'W I IF. AD_ L PANI's. n !3ymbL'l I :. gh r i ng I .x:: i in I is v L II �x, L;iMENU ri LTI ri TCIM4ic,r �tmdmv LIMIDWE W�14G 4%j) l,T V .1 Au Al 4 1 4 —IMTA 1� .1 4 LM .,'mw lnA m !1ti -,mT UPA PIG- 19P AT KW V� z r 7 1 L SITE RM E:E%E- n-r-. 'j wlra di I SITE PLAN I I sp- PAKEL 3 - WEST U0.1 .qvlllhnl & eh �2— 1;2 mr, - ks Q& � 141, 1 M10,62, w -1, ilk, �F ---ac I i h 3ARG-L 'I IT; 1 T. TYQ 13 wilo-d- �Ajwflq- �PEh MTA F UWSMG ,em armed' lM,,:ra- iN. erl kA I., 0 Rill.R.I. FMrl ILI" LU-M -1 ILI ANAN mr.t ianViLMU, SITE PLAN PARM3-EAST �5� 1 k \may -ry yyJ'. r IFY A< M 6i � II Staff Recommendation • Consistent with the intents and purposes of the PGA Blvd. Corridor, staff is recommending that no banners be permitted on light poles located within the 55 -foot special setback area. is Staff recommends approval of MISC- 07 -03- 000026, subject to the above stated condition. 9 J r..« M1 5 d � fl Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board MISC 07 -05- 000030 July 24, 2007 Gardens Commerce Center Master Signage Program AMLL. AD AII r 1 � I r� •r� � ~ ly a _ 44 - - N a ry ■City Council approved Resolution 18, 2007, a PUD for 3 buildings on March 1, 2007 as part of TEPP: ■Building #1: Thies Distributing (39,920 SF); ■Building #2: Flex warehouse /office (8,030 SF); ■Building #3: Flex warehouse /office (21,345 SF). ■ The City Council approved two waivers for signage ■Thies building has two principal tenant signs (facing south and west) ■The principal tenant signs are permitted above the first story. ■Master signage program is required per condition #5 of Resolution 18, 2007 ■Staff supports the 1 waiver request to allow two colors within the PUD and variation of font styles on building 3. ■Staff recommends approval for the master signage program "IT E ii S c wID I STR I BUU ING TIIIE5 DISTRIBUTING •ITHE GARDENS {COMMERCE CENTER rr b Pmpdded 1SRee m LltCh=d Lffmm 1' -1' SGUAREFOOTAGE: Al—bb- R1.ge0.YWR7 Ui95VY24W.2k"C7D%.2MS32 -LIl Sq a' %51Y.1N15S�In FMt ►.p..d&md F.5Ypi�tlieak5M1l'% FY lSgw�R.l ml �� %� �r 115.14 Sq Iw f5t OES IPTION:{Gadatlapnnenx OaldJ wMareveene InMJ1I nlJeterpWekaeS. usxJJmbemw' everW Nuneun IeuJrJmxJ.eanmrcwn�RxA JnJpin no.lo-dm IvSdYg OESGiIPTON:ISdsee wedgy wwd.m.e.w hell (I:stdewwselech.nel IeUeaJefJwmaaM.[hm m IedNuefn.ememtuetuJOerledam hetleJrleee.Jlltledm Be In1en.L5UueinJnd 1dtll Wlle ntan.Nl ntalmlebnnenMllle n5nele Wed OOLOR SOEOULE: 0 Ieenn0e..dkh- �1. GMOBZ A IF r � lwl4q�ynGyn . P R� RnM.GwIM. ��``b. ATLAS a_..Jd _ THE �- > 5Hb SIGN � gAT d LRIr J.1.. URRM15e (�iMYWLLECLL V.ICYV IILLIE Yew Al ° .IyeSN 1p1.Rmn5M Mw•Rin Rwtli B.d•., flwli 51.1 s�• �!IPROTECH kIRadiation Safety Products PMpWlPIMeIM11C lY.1� SQUARE FOOTAGE irar 111mehks faNhat•5959 —F-f lftYKplTmma Prvpwd5q F V UWX215- 9L145q —Fief OESGIPTIORi_ aFeKmm...,a w1.9m h.mubtlwRCf vrr�Ke�. Klr.�.eelw.ra..,�oeKan�enl,�wxr - Ilueh— .%dWwrL COLOR SCHEDULE lwwrw,mow�mraoK� 1 a �-6: ATLAS °�,� a S alaxlxouaTxF a Ra&atLon PROTECH Wety Produds Al Mr�r K1r 9lpyYw S/en F11w•el5e o9n • Fwns�nareKa ROYre n+�ialar �1 � lyy JyJr i Building One: Wall sign for principal tenant (Thies Distributing) Number Letter Size Signage Area (West fagade) (South fagade) Proposed Allowed 2 2 24" 36" 57.6 sf 90 sf 74.88 sf 90 sf Building Two: Wall sign (The Gardens Commerce Center) Proposed Allowed Number 1 1 Letter Size 24" 24" Signage Area 61.38 sf * 90 sf *Calculation does not include space in- between sign text as it is preserving an architectural banding �� lyy JyJr i Building Three: Wall sign (Protech Radiation Safety Products) Proposed Allowed Number 1 1 Letter Size 24" 24" Signage Area 90 sf* 90 sf *The calculation factored in the logo (6 sf) as separate from the text box (84 sf) Building Three: Wall signs for ground floor tenants Number Letter Size Signage Area Proposed One per tenant 24" 21.32 sf Allowed One per tenant 22" 21.49 sf r,x -JOHNSON14 I 111 E HAN I ALIR � C } SQUARE FOOTAGE: -, 3!''](327-= 4M.Nx511= i,AlSgwnRxt ArtwYhigrrr RXltw. L 1.2m MrPnrY itlrXr RXXtSCl11'al,i3' =],!2 SgrXe Raj OESd11pmmi { Mn�ft[4nani rrY1[1]ir[bpglr ItllXriltlOrsbheroubtloutoflN 'AYM�Xn. i IrXrtm Ntr dnmde Bm„u XtlpYi ne,netlm W Idr,a COLOR ECHEOULE: ■ I.nRn D,ia,litlk tubs >l ,. — .. Nnm6NrUXl•�rSnrtl C.rniWbrVhr =,• Xu XXYInX�pu'i m a aaMr9+ THE aam �` nan .��= ATLAS (� t 11�•• � � ��e�J 1i,6 ar lNwmwl� SIGN IMSUBTRI B. l4� 1- lnvuMEEKE CENVElhi tl� r1r s X�1GN 1p1XX�rV1.Mw•XinXW�Brd•y IbYY r�}iirXlX 9' Elementary School Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Meeting July 24, 2007 Petition CUM] 06 -12- 000008 Request The School District of Palm Beach County has requested: —A Major Conditional Use approval for the Modernization of the Palm Beach Gardens Elementary School at the northeast corner of Holly Drive and Riverside Drive. Land Use and Zoning •The subject property is currently zoned Public /Institutional, and has a Future Land Use designation of Public. by a Ifs - °, a s,• '.e� � - F� �I�,. � I� yep 7 � � 1, °•.} s'� stk �('e �� °.� e.5... 5 1-5—: .] Ie 7 t y "k r 1 ✓ q.'7 s, rr { -o fry W P� 'sL ssL •x •%% L sk ars g s•' y s'L I +6 � i��r. z S+f �'Y .ea� .� T , �sL s''•t s'•�'S1� - �. -~•k v 5 5�1 ..Cr' _ • Y .. I �, �: ° 's . -� u b i °.r L• L I 1 •o is r 4',' sLs,�s 2 se sl s s14 } k ' Lati '.1 :MEMO M s� °esL 5L s e 1y. _ I - "OLLY CAF IE r ID r e — .. da , • � � s'e,. �• a L'•`L � 'sl r4 v�.L a5 Copyright (c)2007 Gfty of Palm Beach Ga rd$ nse I FL 4 7$ft ?GAL PALM BEACH GARDENS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE PLAN Peru Goodwin Akrender 6 tiI NEW e WIFIR .. e r e . e e . merce Blvd. Suite 400 -Boca Raton, Florida 33487 - [T] 561988 4002 [F] 561988 3002 This document is the exclusive property of Pierce Goodwin Alexander & Linville (PGAL). The document and information it contains may not be reproduced or used for other than the specific project for which H was prepared without the explicit consent of PGAL Architects Reviewing Standards •Section 1013.33, Florida Statutes (F.S.) District requests determination from City that site is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. •Section 78 -159 of the City's LDR - "Schools, Public and Private, ff must be granted conditional use approval by Council. History School District applied for a conditional use approval in accordance with Section 78 -159 of the City's LDR. ■Staff worked with District to address the major issues. mOn March 27, 2007 the School Board presented the project to the PZAB at a public workshop. Project Details ■ Landscaping: City Forester as is possible design. The applicant has worked with the to accommodate as much landscaping given the State guidelines for school ■ Lighting: The applicant will be lighting the parking and pedestrian areas. ■ Architecture: The applicant is proposing a more contemporary architectural design for the buildings. IP VTAI,UERS L�Tld— , Fe CM < '46 IN, Access &Circulation ■ The proposed plan has three points of vehicular access. One from Ironwood Drive, one from Riverside Drive, and one from Holly Drive. The three access points will provide: — A bus loop accessed via a new ingress /egres off of Holly Drive. — A parent drop off loop accessed from the ingress /egress point off of Ironwood. — An ingress only access point from Riverside Drive. Staff Recommendation ■ Staff has worked closely with the School District to address issues of concern and improve the proposed redevelopment plans. Staff recommends approval of the petition subject to the conditions of approval listed in the staff report.