HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda P&Z 082807.August 28, 2007
Randolph Hansen
Dennis SoComon
Craig XunkCe
NichaeCPanczak
Douglas PenneCC
Barry Present
Jonathan D. Rubins
Joy Hecht (is, Aft.)
-Amir XaneC(z^`` Aa.)
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
10500 N. MILTARY TRAIL • PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410 -4698
MEMORANDUM
DATE: August 28, 2007
TO: Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board Members
FROM: Growth Management Department
SUBJECT: Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board Meeting
Tuesday, August 28, 2007 - 6:30 P.M.
Enclosed is the agenda containing the items to be presented on Tuesday, August 28,
2007. This meeting will be held in the Council Chambers, Palm Beach Gardens
Municipal Building, 10500 North Military Trail, beginning at 6:30 p.m.
Enclosed with this memorandum are the following items:
• 1. An agenda for the meeting; and
2. A compact disc containing PowerPoint presentations
3. A Growth Management Department staff report for the items to be heard.
As always, the respective Project Managers' telephone numbers and e-mail addresses
have been provided in case you have any questions or require additional information on
any petition. This will help us offer better staff support in the review of these
applications.
Nina Sorenson, Administrative Specialist II, will call to confirm your attendance.
Kara L. Irwin, AICP
Growth Management Administrator
�J
is
•
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Date Prepared: July 27, 2007
Meeting Date: August 28, 2007
Petition: PUDA- 07 -03- 000005
Subject/Agenda Item:
Petition PUDA- 07 -03- 000005: Waterford/Wyndham Garden Hotel Planned Unit
Development (PUD) Amendment
Public Hearing & Recommendation to City Council: A request by Cotleur & Hearing,
Inc., on behalf of Pinnacle Hospitality, Inc., to amend the Waterford/Wyndham Garden
Hotel PUD to allow a structural addition between two existing buildings to provide a new
entry, central lobby, and drop -off area; eliminate suites in order to increase the number
of hotel rooms from 77 to the 90 previously approved; eliminate a public restaurant; add
an exit at the north end of the site; add architectural enhancements to existing building;
and provide a courtyard garden. The 1.85 -acre parcel is located on the east side of U.S.
Highway 1, approximately one -tenth of a mile south of PGA Boulevard.
[ X ] Recommendation to APPROVE with one additional waiver
[ ] Recommendation to DENY
Reviewed by:
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
Planning & Zoning
City Attorney:
Growth Management
N/A
Action:
Allan Owens
Project
[ ] Approved
Manage .
Jackie Holl an, AICP
Administrator
[ ] App. w/ conditions
[ ] Denied
Christine P. Tatum, Esq.
Development Compliance:
Planner
ount ant:
] Rec. approval
961)
ftc
] Rec. app. w/ conds.
[X] Quasi — Judicial
[ ] Rec. Denial
Ketty Labos ere
Bahareh Wolfs, AICP
[ ] Legislative
Fees Paid: [ X ] Yes
[ ) Continued to:
Principal P nner:
[X] Public Hearing
Advertised:
[ X ] Required
Attachments:
• Applicant Narrative
Todd Miller, AICP
Date: Aug. 17, 2007
• Location Map
Growtf nagement
Admintor:
Paper: Palm Beach
Post
• DRC Comments
• Reduced Plans
Property Posted
w /Sign:
Date: Aug. 13, 2007
• Ordinance 13, 2005
• Resolution 44, 2005
• Ordinance 14, 1996
Kara Irwin, AICP
Approved By:
City Manager:
• Ordinance 18, 1992
Affected parties:
[X] Notified 8/17/07
• Ordinance 53, 1988
[ ] Not Required
Ronald M. Ferris
• EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
•
Date Prepared: July 27, 2007
Meeting Date: August 28, 2007
Petition: PUDA- 07 -03- 000005
The subject petition is a request to allow the expansion of the 77 -room Waterford Hotel
by adding a new 2,436 square -foot lobby structure that will connect two existing
buildings. The proposed structure will include a covered drop -off area with a bypass
lane. Thirteen suites will be converted back to single rooms, which will increase the
number of rooms to 90, as originally approved. The existing restaurant will change from
public use to a breakfast bar and lounge area for hotel guests. Also included are facade
improvements to the existing buildings, minor site plan improvements, and a new
landscaped courtyard adjacent to the new lobby. In addition, a new exit will be added
on the north side of the site for emergency purposes.
Four waivers were previously approved through the adoption of Resolution 44, 2005.
With this petition, the applicant is requesting one additional waiver to reduce the size of
the loading zone area.
Staff recommends approval with conditions and one additional waiver to reduce the size
of a loading zone.
BACKGROUND
On February 16, 1988, the City Council adopted Ordinance 53, 1988 approving the four-
story Garden Suites Hotel PUD with a total of 90 rooms. On February 21, 1991, the
City Council approved Resolution 22, 1991, which allowed an additional building sign for
the hotel. On August 6, 1992, the City Council adopted Ordinance 18, 1992, which
allowed the construction of a swimming pool facility.
Ordinance 14, 1996 approved an amendment that permitted the demolition of a bank on
the property, and approved construction of a 7,507 square -foot two -story ancillary
building with an underground parking garage. The uses permitted in the ancillary
building included meeting space, professional office, and a continental breakfast service
for hotel guests.
On May 5, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance 13, 2005, which amended
Ordinance 53, 1988, Ordinance 18, 1992, and Ordinance 14, 1996, and also transferred
the site plan and related conditions to Resolution 44, 2005. This resolution approved, in
part, the restaurant use and allowed 13 suites, which reduced the number of hotel
rooms from 90 to 77. Previously, outdoor seating and outdoor musical entertainment
associated with the public restaurant had been a concern of the Twelve Oaks residential
community located immediately east of the site within unincorporated Palm Beach
County. Three conditions prohibiting these activities were included in Resolution 44,
2005, and are proposed to remain in effect.
2
Date Prepared: July 27, 2007
Meeting Date: August 28, 2007
Petition: PUDA- 07 -03- 000005
• LAND USE & ZONING
The subject site has a future land -use designation of Commercial (C), and it is zoned
Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay with an underlying zoning of General
Commercial (CG -1). Please see Table 1 for adjacent property uses and zoning
designations.
CONCURRENCY
Traffic
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement for the
proposed modifications to the hotel and has determined that these changes do not have
a significant impact on the adjacent roadway network. This County traffic concurrency
approval is contingent on a build -out date of December 31, 2008.
Drainaqe
A drainage statement from the applicant indicates that the surface water storage
remains the same for all areas of the site, except the proposed building addition and the
proposed landscape courtyard area. The overall pervious /impervious areas are
consistent, and the storage volumes for the proposed site development exceed that
• which currently exists on the site.
•
PROJECT DETAILS
Access
The subject site currently has a two -way driveway for ingress and egress to the site. A
second exit for emergency vehicles is proposed at the north end of the site. Because of
the addition of the lobby structure, minor vehicle area modifications are proposed.
Parking
As required by Section 78 -345, 1.1 parking spaces are required per hotel room, for a
total of 99 required parking spaces. The required parking spaces have been provided,
with 86 spaces being aboveground and 14 spaces in the underground parking area. An
additional four handicap parking spaces have been provided aboveground on the east
side of the site. The existing multi - purpose area is utilized as storage, an exercise room,
and as a gathering space for patrons staying at the hotel, for which no parking is
required. The space that was previously used as a public restaurant is proposed to be
used only as a breakfast bar and lounge area for hotel guests. Thus, no additional
parking is required for this space.
3
Date Prepared: July 27, 2007
Meeting Date: August 28, 2007
Petition: PUDA- 07 -03- 000005
. Landscaping
A landscape plan has been provided that utilizes both existing and new landscaping
materials consisting of ornamental trees, palms, large and medium shrubs and accent
plants, vines, and groundcovers. In order to accommodate the site modifications, some
existing trees and other landscape materials will be relocated to other areas on site.
Additional landscape materials are being added, which will supplement the existing
plantings within the buffers and along the building foundations.
A new landscaped courtyard east of the proposed lobby building will consist of 2' x 2'
square pavers with 6" sod between the pavers. A new fountain and an 8 -foot wall will
provide privacy at the east end of the courtyard. In addition, a landscaped buffer and a
6 -foot high privacy wall already exist along the east property line, which provide visual
and sound barriers between the site and the Twelve Oaks condominium development.
The landscape plan has been reviewed by the City Forester, and he is satisfied that all
outstanding issues have been addressed.
Architecture
The architecture of the new connecting lobby structure will continue the "Spanish
Mediterranean" theme and character of the two existing buildings. These two buildings,
• which currently feature towers, pre -cast bandings, and scoring, will also have
architectural enhancements to the facades. The new drop -off area will feature a portico
with columns and a tower feature, which the applicant states has been designed to
contribute to a more commanding "sense of presence" on U.S. Highway One. The body
color of the buildings will be Sherwin Williams "GO145 Optima Yellow" and "OC90
Harvest Gold" trim with white accents. The earth tones of the tile roofs will be continued
with the new addition.
Signa.ge
There is an existing monument sign
is being proposed with this petition.
intended for hotel patrons only, no
existing monument sign.
Previously Approved Waivers
at the main entry to the site. No additional signage
Because the breakfast bar and lounge area are
signage for such functions will be allowed on the
The following four waivers were previously approved through the adoption of Resolution
44, 2005:
1. Section 78 -344, Construction and Maintenance, to allow for 53, 9.5 -foot wide
parking spaces.
•
11
Date Prepared: July 27, 2007
Meeting Date: August 28, 2007
Petition: PUDA -07 -03- 000005
• 2. Section 78 -153, Nonresidential Zoning District Regulations, to allow for a 41 -foot
front building setback.
3. Section 78 -153, Nonresidential Zoning District Regulations, to allow for a building
height of 50 feet.
4. Section 78 -153, Nonresidential Zoning District Regulations, to allow an eight -foot
waiver (for a 7 -foot wide) landscape buffer adjacent to residential.
The applicant requests the above waivers be continued and that one additional waiver
be approved regarding a reduction in size of the loading zone. Please see Table 2.
Additional Waiver Request
'
{�g`X {
F1'?
&
q
+ ti"'i L y P
�� '
I'll
. `: p
g $ L d• .` '
c
. '
}
i
•
•
• • •
(1) The applicant states that this existing loading space has served the site since
the previous approval and would, therefore, like to continue its use with the
• current dimensions. It is staff's opinion that by providing additional
landscaping and a courtyard amenity the applicant has provided an innovative
design which justifies the continued use of the existing loading space. Staff
has no objection to this waiver request.
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC) COMMENTS:
Attached are the most recent comments received from the DRC members, along with
the applicant's responses. Included are comments from Fire Rescue and Police
Department representatives, who state they no longer have any concerns or issues.
Furthermore, the applicant has revised the landscape plans to address comments by
Seacoast Utility Authority.
LBFH, Inc., the City's engineering consultant, has reviewed the revised plans and is
satisfied that all certification issues have been addressed.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Previously, outdoor seating and outdoor musical entertainment associated with the
public restaurant had been a concern of the Twelve Oaks residential community located
immediately to the east in unincorporated Palm Beach County. Three conditions
prohibiting these activities were included in Resolution 44, 2005, and are proposed to
• remain in effect.
5
Date Prepared: July 27, 2007
Meeting Date: August 28, 2007
Petition: PUDA- 07 -03- 000005
• Staff recommends APPROVAL of Petition PUDA- 07 -03- 000005, with one additional
waiver and the following conditions:
En_gineerinq:
1. Applicant shall copy to the City all permit applications, permits, certifications and
approvals. (City Engineer)
2. Applicant shall provide all necessary construction zone signage and fencing as
required by the City Engineer. (City Engineer)
3. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration
permit, the Applicant shall provide cost estimates in accordance with LDR Sections
78 -309 and 78 -461 and for on -site project improvements, not including public
infrastructure, or landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the
City. The cost estimates shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and landscape
architect registered in the State of Florida and shall be posted with the City prior to
the issuance of the first land alteration permit. (City Engineer)
4. Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the Applicant shall provide a
cost estimate for public infrastructure, landscaping, and irrigation. The cost estimate
shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and landscape architect registered in the
• State of Florida. The cost estimate shall be based on 110% of the total combined
approved cost estimates and shall be posted with the City prior to the issuance of
the first building permit. (City Engineer)
5. The construction, operation and /or maintenance of any elements of the subject
project shall not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage of surrounding
areas. If, at any time during the project development, it is determined by the City that
any of the surrounding areas are experiencing negative drainage impacts caused by
the project, it shall be the applicant's responsibility to cure said impacts in a period of
time and a manner acceptable to the City prior to additional construction activities.
(City Engineer)
6. Prior to issuance of the first land alteration permit, applicant shall submit
signed /sealed /dated construction plans (paving /grading /drainage and water /sewer)
and all pertinent calculations for review and comment. (City Engineer)
7. Applicant shall comply with any and all Palm Beach County Traffic Division
conditions as outlined in PBC Traffic Division equivalency and concurrency approval
letters. (City Engineer)
8. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration
permit, applicant shall schedule a pre - permit meeting with City staff. (City Engineer)
0
6
Date Prepared: July 27, 2007
Meeting Date: August 28, 2007
Petition: PUDA- 07 -03- 000005
• 9. Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit the applicant shall provide to
the City letters of authorization from the applicable utility companies allowing
landscaping and light poles to be placed within the utility easements. (City Engineer)
10. Applicant shall notify the City's Public Works Division at least 10 working days prior
to the commencement of any work/construction activity within any public right -of -way
within the City of Palm Beach Gardens. In the case of a city right -of -way, the
applicant has at least five working days to obtain a right -of -way permit. Right -of -way
permits may be obtained at the Building Division. Failure to comply with this
condition could result in a Stop Work Order of all work/construction activity within the
public right -of -way and the subject development site. (Public Works)
Building:
11. Separate permit and application will be required for: paving, drainage, water and
sewer improvements, landscaping, irrigation, site lighting, signage, fire sprinkler and
fire alarm. (Building)
Police CPTED:
12. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, lighting locations and
building addresses shall not conflict with landscaping, including long -term canopy
• growth. In addition, landscaping shall not obstruct the view of windows, building
address numbers or walkways. (Police Department)
13. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the Applicant shall provide
a timer clock or photocell sensor engaged lighting above or near entryways and
adjacent sidewalks. (Police Department)
14. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant shall provide a street
address system depicting street names and numerical addresses for emergency
response purposes. Address system depiction shall be in 8.5" x 11" map format.
(Police Department)
15. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant shall submit a
construction site security and management plan for review and approval by the
Police Department. Non - compliance with the approved security and management
plan may result in a stop -work order for all construction activities. (Police
Department)
16. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, all on -site lighting shall be
installed, including the existing underground parking garage, and shall include all
exterior pedestrian walkway lighting, which shall utilize 12 foot pedestrian scale light
poles. All on -site lighting shall consist of metal halide or equivalent lighting approved
• by the Police Department. (Police Department)
7
Date Prepared: July 27, 2007
Meeting Date: August 28, 2007
Petition: PUDA- 07 -03- 000005
is 17. Prior to the Issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the lobby addition
building, the Applicant shall provide a timer clock or photocell sensor engaged
lighting above or near entryways and adjacent sidewalks for said building. (Police
Department)
18. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the lobby addition
building, all entry doors shall be equipped with a metal plate over the threshold of
locking mechanism and case hardened deadbolt locks on all exterior doors with
minimum one (1) inch throw; door hinges on the interior side of each door, and the
main entries to the lobby addition building shall be wired for closed- circuit digital
camera surveillance system. (Police Department)
19. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the lobby addition
building, all numerical addresses shall be placed at the front and rear of each
building. Each numerical address shall be illuminated for nighttime visibility, shall
provide bi- directional visibility from the roadway (when applicable), shall consist of
twelve (12) inches in height, and shall be a color different than the color of the
surface to which it is attached. The rear doors of a building with multiple tenants
shall have an illuminated 6 -inch room number placed on or along side door. (Police
Department)
• 20. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for each building, elevator
cab interiors which are not completely visible when door is open, shall have shatter -
resistant mirrors placed in a location approved by the Police Department. (Police
Department)
21. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the existing four -story
building on the north end of the site shall have street address numbers placed on the
roof -top parallel to U.S. Highway One. Such numbers shall only be visible from the
air. The numerals shall be white blocked letters of weather resistant material, four
feet in height, and 18 inches wide. (Police Department)
22. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for each building, interior
stairwell doors shall have glazing vision panels, five inches wide by 20 inches in
height. Areas beneath stairways at ground level shall be fully enclosed. Fully
enclosed stairways with solid walls shall have shatter resistant mirrors at each level
and landing placed to provide visibility around corners. (Police Department)
Planninq & Zoning:
23. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant shall post escrow or
make payment in -lieu for Art in Public Places in accordance with the City Code. if the
Applicant is proposing art on site, an application for art approval shall be submitted
• prior to the issuance of the first building permit, and the art shall be approved prior to
E
Date Prepared: July 27, 2007
Meeting Date: August 28, 2007
Petition: PUDA- 07 -03- 000005
. the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. If the art is not approved prior to the
issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the City shall have the option of
withdrawing the escrow. (Planning & Zoning)
24. At no time shall staging of construction vehicles and /or service vehicles occur within
a public right -of -way. All vehicular construction activities shall occur on the hotel
site. (Planning & Zoning)
25. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the Applicant shall demonstrate safe
access and segregation of the construction areas from the public areas. (Planning &
Zoning)
26. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for vertical construction, the Applicant
shall install a six (6) foot tall construction fence with a privacy tarp surrounding the
construction area of the property. (Planning & Zoning)
27. The Applicant shall coordinate and receive approval from the Growth Management
Administrator prior to the closing of any public sidewalk. (Planning & Zoning)
28. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each phase, digital files of the
approved plat shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Division, and approved
civil design and architectural drawings, including floor plans, shall be submitted prior
• to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for each phase. (GIS Manager)
29. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, required digital files of the approved plat
in its entirety transformed to NAD 83 State Plan Coordinate System shall be
submitted. Prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, approved civil
engineering as -built design and architectural drawings shall be submitted in digital
format. (Planning & Zoning)
30. No general public restaurant, bar, or lounge use shall be allowed on the premises. The
breakfast bar and lounge shall be for hotel patrons use only, and no signage shall be
allowed on the entry monument sign advertising a restaurant, bar, or lounge.
(Planning & Zoning, Code Enforcement)
Resolution 44, 2005 - Revised Conditions of Approval:
1. All mechanical louvers shall be painted to match the surrounding wall. (Planning &
Zoning)
2. Musical entertainment, including, but not limited to, bands, instruments, and
speakers shall be prohibited in all outside areas on site. (Planning & Zoning, Code
Enforcement)
. 3. Outdoor seating for the restaurant breakfast bar and lounge area shall be
9
Date Prepared: July 27, 2007
Meeting Date: August 28, 2007
Petition: PUDA- 07 -03- 000005
• prohibited, no food and beverage service shall be permitted in any outside area,
and the all existing outdoor seating and food and beverage service operation shall
cease immediately upon the adoption of this Resolution. (Planning & Zoning, Code
Enforcement)
rff�rrmnl"a Erna.
.._
6. Within 45 days from the effective date of this Resolution, the applicant shall convert
the existing meeting room area to a multi - purpose space to be utilized for hotel
guests. (SATISFIED). This multi - purpose space shall be limited to lobby space,
storage, an exercise area, or to address the needs of guests staying at the hotel.
No outside meetings, such as banquets or receptions, shall be permitted on site.
(Planning & Zoning, Code Enforcement).
7. The parking area below the ancillary building shall be 100% clear of all hotel and
restaurant storage, including the walled -in area located in the rear of the
underground parking area, immediately following the adoption of this Resolution.
• The walled -in storage area shall be converted into two parking spaces immediately
following the adoption of this Resolution. (Planning & Zoning, Code Enforcement)
8. Within six months from the effective date of this Resolution, the applicant shall
construct two additional vertical feet to its existing concrete wall located along its
eastern boundary line. The existing concrete wall separates the applicant's
property from the Twelve Oaks Condominium Association, Inc. The applicant shall
apply for and obtain all necessary permits. The two -foot addition shall be built and
painted to match the existing wall. (SATISFIED)
9. The applicant shall use its best efforts to secure all necessary consent and permits
to construct a fence to secure the approximately fifteen feet of unsecured property
along the southeast corner of the applicant's property to prevent pedestrian traffic
between its property and the Twelve Oaks Condominium Association, Inc. Said
concrete wall or fence shall be built to the same vertical height of the existing
concrete wall located along its eastern boundary line. Said wall or fence may
include a lockable gate. If said wall is constructed of concrete, it shall match the
existing concrete wall and painted to match the existing wall. (SATISFIED)
10. The applicant shall prohibit swimming past dusk and use its best efforts to prevent
excessive noise between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.
• jholloman /case files/Wyndham akaWaterford /Staff report PUDA -07 -03 -00005 PZAB.doc
Bull
•
Subject Propert y
Waterford/Wyndham
Garden Hotel
North
Wendy's
Date Prepared: July 27, 2007
Meeting Date: August 28, 2007
Petition: PUDA- 07 -03- 000005
Planned Unit Development/ Commercial
General Commercial
(PUD /CG -1)
General Commercial I Commercial
(CG -1)
South Planned Unit Development/ Professional Office
The Towers Office Professional Office
Building (PUD /PO)
U
West
U.S. Highway One &
Northern Trust Bank
East
Twelve Oaks
Condominiums
r�
U
Planned Unit Development/ Commercial
General Commercial
(PUD /CG -1)
Residential High — Palm Residential High —
Beach County Palm Beach County
11
•
7
•
Date Prepared: July 27, 2007
Meeting Date: August 28, 2007
Petition: PUDA -07 -03- 000005
Minimum Site Width
300.8 feet
Yes
100 feet:
(measured at front
building setback line)
Maximum Building Lot
20.81%
Yes
Coverage: 35%
Maximum Building Height:
50 feet
Waiver previously
36 feet
approved
Setbacks:
Front: 45.7'
Waiver previously
Front: 50 feet
North Side: 53.8'
approved for 41 -foot front
Side: 15 feet
South Side: 59.5'
setback
Rear: 15 feet
Rear: 52.7'
Parking Required: 99 spaces Yes
99 spaces
Parking Space Size: 9.5' x 18.5' Waiver Previously
10'x 18.5' Approved
Landscape Buffer 7 -foot Waiver Previously
Adjacent to Residential: Approved
15 -foot
12
�J
•
U
Cotleur&
Hearing
1934 Commerce Lane • Suite 1 • Jupiter, Florida
August 20, 2007
Landscape Architects I Land Planners I Environmental Consultants
33458 • Ph 561.747.6336 • Fax 561.747.1377 • Lic. #LC- C000239
To: Jackie Holloman, City of Palm Beach Gardens
Cc: Kenneth Ufkin, Twelve Oaks Condominium Association, Inc.
Eleanor Wehrman, Twelve Oaks
Barry Norton, Twelve Oaks Jim Geiger, Titan
Don Hearing, Cotleur & Hearing, Inc.
From: Ali Kalfin, Cotleur & Hearing, Inc.
Re: Wyndham Garden Hotel
Meeting Minutes 8.20.07
The meeting was held at 10 AM at the Twelve Oaks club house. Ken Ufkin, Eleanor
Wehrman and Barry Norton attended from Twelve Oaks. Don Hearing and Ali Kalfin
attended on behalf of Wyndham Garden Hotel. Jim Geiger, the owner of the hotel, was
also in attendance.
Don Hearing reviewed the site plan and architectural addition proposed for the future
Wyndham Garden Hotel with Ken, Eleanor, and Barry. He explained that Jim Geiger
was requesting these improvements to attract a quality hotel flag for the property. To
secure a flag like Wyndham versus a Motel 6, the hotel must have internal connections
from the guest suites to the amenities in the other building. The hotel must also have a
central lobby area.
The homeowner association manager and the homeowners understood these
requirements but wanted to make sure that both the noise and smell elements from
the hotel would be limited. They had issues with the previous owners regarding both
loud music and outside grilling. Jim confirmed that outside grilling, happy hours, etc.
would not occur on his property and that loud music would not be played outside.
Eleanor and Barry explained that they were happy that the space would now be well
used and occupied by a good element. They said they realized that people would be
outside but requested that the noise and smell factors were kept at bay.
Construction of the addition was also discussed. Jim Geiger confirmed that the hours
of construction would be limited to day time only and limited on weekends. He also
added that 32 security cameras had been recently installed on the property.
Eleanor and Barry said they would attend the PZAB meeting on the August 28th, 2007.
•
Cotleur&
Hearing
Windsor Gardens Hotel
(a.k.a. Waterford Hotel)
Site Plan Amendment
Justification Statement
Introduction
February 26th, 2007
The 1.85 -acre property located on U.S. Highway 1 in the City of Palm Beach Gardens is
currently approved for a 77 room hotel and a +/- 1,700- square foot restaurant open to
the public. The property was recently sold to Pinnacle Hospitality who would like to
return the site to its original approval of straight hotel with no public rest�nt m5-Q,. The
applicant is requesting a major amendment to a PUD to perms 0 otel rooms and hotel
accessory uses. The applicant is also proposing several upgrades to the subject property
to improve the current site conditions. The upgrades included within this request are:
• 1. Structural addition between existing buildings to provide for new entry, central
lobby and drop -off area
2. Facade improvements to existing buildings
3. New courtyard to be located between existing buildings as site amenity
4. Minor vehicular area modifications
5. A second exit to U.S. Highway 1
Specific Requests and Fees
PCD or PUD Amendment $2,250.00
Total Fees $2,250.00
APPLICANT
Pinnacle Hospitality
Attn: Jim Geiger
11231 US Highway 1, Suite 381
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33401
Cotleur&
Hearing
ryr
Windsor Gardens Site Plan h :ndment
2.26.07 Justification Statement
Project Team
• AGENT / PLANNER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
Cotleur & Hearing, Inc.
Attn: Don Hearing / Alessandria Kalfin
1934 Commerce Lane, Suite 1
Jupiter, Florida 33458
P: 561 - 747 -6336 ext. 128
F: 561 - 747 -1377
ARCHITECT
Ames Design International
Attn: Shane Ames
203 Dixie Boulevard
Delray Beach, FL 33444
P: 561- 274 -6444
F: 561- 274 -6449
CIVIL ENGINEER
Michael B. Schorah & Associates, Inc.
Attn: Martha Carter
1850 Forest Hill Blvd, Suite 206
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
P: 561 - 968 -0080
• F:561- 642 -9726
TRAFFIC ENGINEER
Kimley -Horn & Associates, Inc.
Attn: Adam Kerr
4431 Embarcadaro Drive
West Palm Beach, FL 33407
P: 561 - 840 -0874
F: 561- 863 -8175
General Project Description
The subject property is a 1.85 acre property located on the east side of U.S. Highway 1,
just south of the PGA Boulevard intersection. The property possesses a Commercial PUD
zoning designation and consistent Commercial comprehensive land use designation. The
parcel is surrounded by properties with compatible commercial land use and zoning
designations with the exception of the property to the east, which is located within
unincorporated Palm Beach County and holds the Twelve Oaks Condo community. The
most recently approved site plan permitted a 77 room hotel and a +/- 1,700- square foot
restaurant open to the public. The property was recently sold to Pinnacle Hospitality
who would like to return the site to its original approval of straight hotel with out
restaurant use. Pinnacle Hospitality, the applicant, is also proposing several upgrades to
• the hotel property to improve the current conditions of the run -down business.
Cotleur&
Hearing
Windsor Gardens Site Plan A_ ..;ndment
2.26.07 Justification Statement
• The Applicant is proposing to make an amendment to the currently approved site plan
for the 1.85 acre parcel. The modifications with the request include:
1. The elimination of restaurant use
2. The addition of thirteen (13) hotel rooms
3. An additional structure and courtyard on the ground floor to connect the existing
buildings
4. Fagade improvements to existing buildings
5. Minor vehicular area modifications
6. A second exit to U.S. Highway 1
The overall square footage of the hotel structure is to remain the same; the applicant is
eliminating hotel suites to attain the thirteen additional hotel rooms. The addition
between the two existing structures will be for lobby and concierge space, an essential
element of the hotel business. Tl raa that- was -prre.Yiously, fQj�.the public restaurant= is
proposed to �e.�.Sed. as -a, breakfast bar and lounge area for hotel guests only, The new
exit onto U.S. Highway 1 has been provided to alleviate the possible congestion
provided by the elimination of the drive aisle between the existing buildings.
Vehicular Circulation & Parking:
The overall program of the site will remain consistent with the previous site plan
approvals. The parking area has been modified insignificantly to accommodate improved
ADA conditions, additional landscape, and code - abiding parking spaces (including
previously approved waivers). The circulation between the two existing buildings on -site
has been eliminated for the proposed lobby and courtyard area. A second exit has been
• added to the north side of the site to alleviate the congestion that would possibly
accumulate due to the proposed lobby and courtyard. The one -way exit has been
preliminary approved by FDOT and will be formally applied for once site plan approval is
issued by the City. The existing entrance /exit in the central area of the site is to remain,
however the configuration of the traffic flow once inside the site has changed slightly
due to the proposed structure. The proposed structure will include a new drop -off area
for guests that will be covered and will have a by -pass lane to prevent stacking
problems. This area will also be managed by the hotel to ensure that cars do not park or
sit idle preventing traffic to move harmoniously.
Architecture:
The architecture of the new structure will be consistent with the character and
architecture of the existing buildings on the site. The architectural treatments and
colors to the new and existing structures are a large improvement to what existed prior.
The addition will be most noticeable at the sites frontage and will provide a new central
entry to the hotel. The structure will add significant presence to the U.S. Highway 1
corridor.
40 Cotleur&
Hearing
Windsor Gardens Site Plan A, ...ndment
2.26.07 Justification Statement
• COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 78- 49(b):
AMENDMENTS TO APPROVED DEVELOPMENT ORDERS:
MAJOR AMENDMENTS
(1) Increase of intensity. Any change in nonresidential intensity which, in combination
with prior minor amendments, cumulatively exceeds the limitations or standards listed
below.
An increase in hotel rooms is requested; however the elimination of restaurant use will
negate increased effect by these additional rooms.
a. Relocation. Any proposed relocation of the approved number of gross square
footage which is equal to or greater than five percent of the approved gross
square feet of all nonresidential structures.
Not applicable
b. Decrease in required parking. Unless otherwise provided in this chapter, any
proposed decrease of the existing number of parking spaces which is the greater
of five percent of the existing parking spaces or 20 parking spaces. Decreases in
required parking otherwise requiring action by the planning, zoning and appeals
board or the city council shall not be considered a major amendment for the
purpose of this section.
• Only four (4) parking spaces are eliminated from the approved site plan due to the
use change. The proposed 99 parking spaces is what currently exists on site.
c. Increase in the number of structures. Any proposed increase in the number of
principal or accessory structures that changes the overall intent of the original
approval.
The additional structure proposed to connect the ground floor of the existing
buildings will not change the intent of the original approval; it will improve the
current site conditions by providing internal access from one building to the other.
d. Any proposed reduction of heavily utilized parking spaces as determined by the
growth management director.
Not applicable
(2) Increase in density. Any increase in the approved number of residential units.
Not applicable
(3) Increase in building height above the height permitted in the applicable zoning
district.
• Not applicable
Cotleur&
Hearing
Windsor Gardens Site Plan i- ..— mdment
2.26.07 Justification Statement
• (4) Utility facilities. Any addition or relocation of outdoor utility facilities, including, but
not limited to, the following: chillers, air - conditioning units, above - ground fuel tanks
including propane or natural gas, electrical equipment such as junction boxes, and
ground- mounted service boxes for public utilities such as telephones and cable
television, which are deemed to be substantial by the growth management director. This
shall not apply to single - family lots or duplex lots.
Not applicable
(5) Boundary changes. Any proposed boundary change of the approved development
plan.
Not applicable
(6) Traffic impact. Any increase in overall traffic impact, except as may be provided in
this chapter.
A traffic impact statement has been included within this application. The statement
concludes that no significant traffic impact will be created due to the changes in use or
the additional exit.
(7) Character and appearance. Any amendment which would negatively impact the
character or the appearance of an approved development.
is The structural addition was designed to be completely consistent with the existing
buildings on site and will not negatively impact the character or appearance of the
development.
(8) Amenities. Any amendment which would materially decrease the number or size of
amenities in all or a portion of any residential or nonresidential development.
The applicant is adding a courtyard amenity to the site with this application request.
Amenities will not be decreased by any means.
(9) Residential unit types. Any change in the approved mix of residential dwelling unit
types that would require alterations of an approved plat.
Not applicable
(10) Architectural style. Any change in the approved architectural style of residential
dwelling unit types or nonresidential structures which results in:
a. An architectural style that is out of character with the approved or existing
architecture (e.g., change from Mediterranean style to neo- classical).
The architectural style for the addition is consistent with what currently exists on site.
• b. New residential models that are substantially different from approved models.
Cotleum
Hearing
Windsor Gardens Site Plan r_...:,ndment
2.26.07 Justification Statement -
• Not applicable
(11) Building materials. Any significant changes in exterior building materials that
result in a downgrade as determined by the growth management director.
The applicant has improved the building materials that were previously used for the
existing buildings on site and has used these new materials for the addition as well.
(12) Changes to phasing or conditions. Any changes to an approved development
phasing plan or any condition of development approval.
A change to the development order is being requested to amend the approved uses for
the site from hotel and restaurant to hotel only. The applicant proposes to eliminate a#
conditions from Resolution 44 2005 that directly relate to the previously approved
restaurant use. The applicant also proposes a revision to the development order that
would permit up to 90 hotel rooms.
(13) Changes to developer's agreements. Any changes to an approved developer's
agreement.
Not applicable
• Conclusion
This request for a PUD major amendment is in harmony with the City's Comprehensive
Plan and Zoning Code, and is consistent with the existing surrounding land uses and
original land development approvals for the site. The request meets all adopted levels
of service within the City. The Applicant looks forward to meeting with City
representatives to discuss the revisions and improvements to the site plan and respond
to any outstanding comments or issues that staff may have.
• Cotleur&
®Hearing
ES #2438
Michael B. Schorah and Associates, Inc.
ENGINEERS *SURVEYORS *DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS
WINDSOR GARDENS HOTEL
WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS
SUITE 206
1850 FOREST HILL BLVD.
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33406
PHONE (561) 968 -0080
FAX (561) 642 -9726
Land Uses Proposed Area Existing Area Net Change
Building /Pool Area
0.46 acres
Pavement Area
0.96 acres
Green Area
0.43 acres
Total Area
1.85 acres
0.41 acres
0.05 acres
1.05 acres
-0.09 acres
0.39 acres
0.04 acres
1.85 acres
0.00 acres
WWW.SCHORAH.COM
Surface storage remains the same for all areas of the site except the proposed building
addition and the proposed landscape courtyard area. Storage volumes for these areas are
as follows:
Proposed:
Building Area = 0.05 acres el. 16.0 min.
• Green Area = 0.04 acres el. 14.0 to el. 15.5
Surface Storage at elevation 16.0 = 0.04 ac. -ft.
Soil Storage (> 4' above GWT) = 0.04 ac. x 10.9 in. x 0.75 = 0.33 ac. -in. = 0.03 ac. -ft.
Total Storage Volume = 0.04 ac. -ft. + 0.03 ac. -ft. = 0.07 ac. -ft.
Existing:
Pavement Area = 0.09 acres el. 14.53 to el. 15.90
Surface Storage at elevation 16.0 = 0.04 ac. -ft.
Soil Storage = 0.00 ac. -ft.
Total Storage Volume = 0.04 ac. -ft. + 0.00 ac. -ft. = 0.04 ac. -ft.
The overall pervious /impervious areas are consistent and the storage volumes for the
proposed site development exceed that which currently exists on the site.
Martha H. Carter, P.E.
Florida Registration No. 47589
• Dated:
D7
CIVIL - STRUCTURAL - DRAINAGE - HIGHWAYS - WATER a SEWER - SURVEY
o`
Al
Holly Ln
Reaon or W Monet Dr /10
N French
Ue7arrir 2 Dens Passage
Niki Jo Ln
Palm Harbor
Laurel Li
Inland Cove I
O�
COtiCUr &
Hearing
\�
Florida Blvd
Atlantic
Rd
T
d,
r
L
0.
f
m
'n
d
o-
n
CD
3
=1
N
�
m
D
CD
co
Carib Cir
Bay Cir
Azure Cir
PROJECT SITE
W, Rolling Green Rd
3 O s asi
a
Crafton Rd
c;
N Juno Isles Blvd
Ardley Rd
0
N
w Seminole Blvd
Universe Blvd
Pleasant Dr
Ocala Rd
Juno Rd
Len Dr /
a o
qO
c�
yr
CL w. Canal Rd ,❑
E c E
U -J LL Carolind Dr n `
o Rca Blvd F 70 Oaks -a, Monet Rd McLaren\f2d
C7r o Lake forth 0(p
L
tF
Tall Oaks Or o (L Garden Ln
o Burns Rd
D 01 o O
to
O ads �
U ;
O Palm Ln 0 c6
03 U° �rlook O'
� p Or fr .
E C
m
Q 0 \ CD
01 y Ironwood Rd. Shore Rd N aO,
w
Marlin Rd .> 0.
No►th m Beach Lighthouse Dr a
Kingfish Rd
d m lbls: InletRd \f Rd tlantic
o �'
CL ay W °. u bbflde D o
v Q °_
Gu \\ G� E v.
Z Guava St v
W N E
1 inch equals 0.5 miles
Map Document: (F:1AmMap_Pmjec1s106 -0620 WATERFORD MOTEUBASE.mxa)
212212007 - 3 34:04 PM
palm Way?
Nose
m m
CD
Village Rd
Location Map
Waterford Hotel
COtiCUr &
Hearing
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
1934 Commerce Lane
Suite 1
Jupiter, FL 33458
Phone: 561- 747.6336
Fax: 561- 747 -1377
v b
KI
t. i •$M
a
ray t . B
.T 1
l
b �p
!. 4
`6
3
R
t �• r
Pat
$ li►
A a
�Y
*t�rs;�•.. a
�Y ?R
w g 1 e
K A•.
t!
t
SR•:r I_ � j ��
rr►51. `�i� s.. , ,.
4t '�
�q "R4.T�App!A�Mer D/
r
h� P
t ;
Cotleur &
Hearing
is1934 Commerce Lane • Suite 1 • Jupiter, Florida
To: Jackie Holloman
Cc: Jim Orth
From: Alessandria Kalfin
Date: August 1, 2007
Landscape Architects I Land Planners I Environmental Consultants
33458 • Ph 561.747.6336 • Fax 561.747.1377 • Lic. #LC- C000239
Subject: Wyndham Garden Hotel (f.k.a. Waterford Hotel)
Please accept the following responses to the LBFH comments from Jim Orth dated
July 25th, 2007.
4. Not Satisfied.
a. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall revise the walk width, which is shown on
the engineering plan to be four (4') feet wide, to be a minimum five (5') foot clear walk,
measured from the back of curb, for conformance to the requirements of Section 78-
230 of the LDR.
• Response: The site plan, engineering plan and architectural site plan have been
revised to reflect this change. Please see the revised plans included within this
resubmittal.
17. Not Satisfied
a. — d. Parking garage
Response: Per the team lighting consultants correspondence with Jim Orth, today
August 1 st, 2007, LBFH has agreed that Comment #17 pertaining to the garage photometrics
does not apply to Site Approval, and shall be addressed during the hotel's interior renovation
phase. Jim Orth has confirmed that the garage photometric plans will be addressed during the
interior phase.
CRY OF PAIM BCH GDNS
•�lG - 2 2001
PLANNING & ZONING Did;
Cotleur&
® Hearing Landscape Architecture Land Planners I Environmental Consultants
934 Commerce Lane • Suite 1 • Jupiter, Florida • 33458 • Ph 561.747.6336 Fax 561.747.1377 • Lic. #LC- C000239
July 20; 2007
Ms. Jackie Holloman
Planning & Zoning Division
City of Palm Beach Gardens
10500 North Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
RE: Waterford/Wyndham Garden Hotel PUD Amendment
Dear Ms. Holloman:
We offer the following comment on your transmittal dated July 17, 2007 concerning the
referenced project. The applicant needs to revise the landscape plans and provide a root
•barrier at the backflow preventer and meter located in the southerly Seacoast easement.
`L A 58" root barrier has been added to the plan, a minimum of 4' from the backflow
-�C preventer.
Please call if you require additional information.
Sincerely yours,
Cot�leur & Hearing, Inc.
All Kalfin, Land Planner
it A
Cotleur &
HearingLandscape Architects I Land Planners I Environmental Consultants
• 1934 Commerce Lane • Suite 1 • Jupiter, Florida - 33458 - Ph 561.747.6336 • Fax 561.747.1377 - Lic. #LC- C000239
TO: Jackie Holloman
FROM: Alessandria Kalfin
DATE: July 13`h, 2007
FILE NO. 16792
SUBJECT: Waterford Hotel
Response to LBFH 6.7.07 Comments
PUDA- 07 -03 -05
4. Not Satisfied. While the applicant dimension the elements of the plan including; the
radii of the entry rotary area, the entrance drive to the underground parking, etc. for
conformance with Section 78 -46 of the LDR. However;
• a. The applicant shall revise the walk width, which is shown on the engineering
plan to be four (4') feet wide, to be a minimum five (5') foot clear walk,
measured from the back of curb, for conformance to the requirements of
Section 78 -230 of the LDR.
Response: The sidewalk has been revised to a width of S feet from the back of curb on the
engineering plans.
b. The applicant shall dimension the sidewalk abutting the handicap stalls, on the
east side of the building, for conformance with Section 78 -230 of the LDR. As
the applicant proposes handicap ramps for this walk, modification of the width
will be required to meet the five (5') foot minimum noted above.
Response: The sidewalk has been dimensioned on the engineering plans as 5-feet. The site plan
had previously dimensioned this sidewalk at 5-feet.
c. The applicant shall revise the architectural plan (Sheet P2), landscape plan,
engineering plan, site plan and photometric plan for consistency. The
architectural plan, landscape plan and photometric plan show a walk along the
rotary, north of the garage entrance, whereas the engineering plan and site plan
do not propose a walk at this location.
• Response: The site plan, landscape plan and engineering plan have been consistent in showing
JUL 16 2007
Ms. Jackie Holloman
Wyndham Gardens Hotel (f.k.a. Waterford Hotel)
Response to LBFH
June 13, 2007
Page 2 of 7
. a planted area to the north of the garage entrance. The architectural site plan and photometric
plan have been revised to eliminate the walk and add the planting area.
5. Not Satisfied. While the applicant clarified the size of the loading area (Sheet 1 of 5),
which does not scale to agree with the requirements of Section 78 -362 of the LDR.
The applicant notes that the space was not constructed in compliance with the
previous approval, which required the loading space size be 12' x 35' per the LDR.
However, the applicant is requesting a waiver to permit the utilization of the current
10.5' x 32.5' loading space as shown.
Response: The applicant acknowledges this comment.
7. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall revise the loading space sign (Sheet i of 5) to
clearly indicate that it is a loading space, as shown in Figure 2B -16 of the MUTCD.
However,
a. While the applicant has indicated that a loading zone sign is required, the
applicant shall specify the sign designation and/or provide a detail conforming
to the MUTCD sign guidelines, either on the plan view or the detail page.
Response: A detail conforming to the MUTCD sign guidelines have been added to the detail
. page of the site plan.
17. Not Satisfied. The applicant provided a signed and sealed photometric plan for
compliance with Ordinance 26, 2006 and the City's lighting policy, which amends
Section 78 -182 and Section 78 -751 of the LDR. However,
•
a. The applicant shall provide certified test results that the parking garage meets
the current code or a remediation plan, with a photometric plan, which meets
current code.
Response: The applicant has provided a revised photometric plan which provides test results
for the existing parking garage which meets current code.
18. Not Satisfied. The photometric plan shall identify the proposed lighting levels, as
noted in Table 1 of said Ordinance 26, 2006, of the drive lanes and parking stalls,
portico, pedestrian use areas (including walks and open space, pool, deck, courtyard
area) and the parking garage, etc. However, the applicant shall provide the following,
for conformance with said Ordinance 26, 2006 and the City's lighting standards.
a. The applicant shall provide lighting level data for the pedestrian use areas
including;
i. All walkways and pathways (to back of walk/path).
FAProject DocumentsT6 -0820 Waterford HoteRMAJOR AMENDMEN iIRESPONSES1060820MA_2nd Response.doc
Ms. Jackie Holloman
Wyndham Gardens Hotel (f.k.a. Waterford Hotel)
Response to LBFH
June 13, 2007
Page 3 of 7
• ii. The accessible route from USH 1 to the entry and along the west side
of the garage.
Response: The applicant has added lighting level data for the pedestrian use areas which
include all walkways and pathways as well as the accessible route from US] property
boundary to the entry of the hotel.
b. The applicant shall revise the numeric summary to indicate separate values for
the pedestrian areas, in addition to the property line, parking area and pool
area which are shown.
Response: The numeric summary has been revised to indicate walkway areas .
c. The applicant shall clarify the illumination proposed for the courtyard area.
The applicant currently shows the existing lighting to be removed and
discarded, indicating that no lighting will be provided for this area.
Response:Per note 5 on the photometric plan, low voltage landscape lighting is proposed for
the private, enclosed courtyard.
d. The applicant shall clarify if the courtyard is to be accessible to the hotel
• guests.
Response: The courtyard will be accessible to the hotel guests by the walk located on the
southwest corner of the courtyard. This has been noted on the site plan.
e. The applicant shall provide lighting and associated light level data if the
courtyard is to be utilized by guests.
Response: The applicant has provided lighting in the courtyard and surrounding walkways.
f. The applicant shall revise the engineering plan, site plan and landscape plan
for consistency with the photometric plans as to the proposed location of
lighting fixtures.
Response: The engineering, site and landscape plans have been updated to reflect the most
recent photometric plan revisions.
20. Not Satisfied. The applicant provided a sign to identify that the ingress traffic is to
keep right at the rotary (Sheet 1 of 5). However, the following is noted;
a. We suggest that the applicant consider relocating the "Do Not Enter" sign to
• the rotary island for better visibility to entering traffic.
F: \Project Documents\06 -0820 Waterford Hotel \MAJOR AMEN DMEMIRESPONSES %060820_MA_2nd Response.doc
:7
Ms. Jackie Holloman
Wyndham Gardens Hotel (f.k.a. Waterford Hotel)
Response to LBFH
June 13, 2007
Page 4 of 7
Response: The sign has been relocated to the rotary.
23. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall verify that the proposed CR -10 ramp (Sheet 1 of 3),
for the front entry drop off area, conforms to the requirements noted in FDOT Index
304, specifically, it does not appear that the required four (4') foot landing will be
provided, given the location of the building relative to the curb line. However,
a. While the applicant revised the building plan to provide the required landing
area for the FDOT Type CR -10 curb ramp, the applicant shall revise the plans
for consistency.
b. The architectural plan shows a drop curb and wide ramp for the accessible
entry at the Portico, whereas the engineering plan and other plans show a
FDOT Type CR -10 curb ramp for this location.
Response: The architectural site plan has been revised to be consistent with the site and
engineering plans.
Waiver Requests
• 1. Not Satisfied. The applicant is requesting a waiver from Section 78 -344 of the LDR
regarding parking stall widths. Please note we remain in support of the City's LDR
requirements.
•
Response: This waiver has been granted by previous approval and serves the existing
conditions of the site. The applicant continues to request this waiver.
2. Not Satisfied. The applicant is requesting a waiver from Section 78 -153 of the LDR
regarding setback requirements. Please note we remain in support of the City's LDR
requirements.
Response: This waiver has been granted by previous approval and serves the existing
conditions of the site. The applicant continues to request this waiver.
3. Not Satisfied. The applicant is requesting a waiver from Section 78 -153 of the LDR
regarding building height. Please note we remain in support of the City's LDR
requirements.
Response: This waiver has been granted by previous approval and serves the existing
conditions of the site. The applicant continues to request this waiver.
FAProject Documents \06 -0820 Waterford Hotel \MAJOR AMENDMEN RRESPONSES \060820_MA_2nd Response.doc
Ms. Jackie Holloman
Wyndham Gardens Hotel (f.k.a. Waterford Hotel)
Response to LBFH
June 13, 2007
Page 5 of 7
• 4. Not Satisfied. The applicant is requesting a waiver from Section 78 -186 of the LDR
regarding landscape buffer for commercial parcel abutting residential parcel. Please note we
remain in support of the City's LDR requirements.
Response: This waiver has been granted by previous approval and serves the existing
conditions of the site. The applicant continues to request this waiver.
Additional Waiver Requests
6. The applicant is requesting a waiver from Section 78 -362 of the LDR regarding a 12' x 35'
loading zone with a 12' x 35' maneuvering area. The applicant is proposing to utilize the
existing 10.5' x 32.5' loading zone (as noted in Certification Comment #5). Please note we
remain in support of the City's LDR requirements.
Response: This waiver serves the existing conditions of the site. The applicant continues to
request this waiver.
Non - Certification Issues
• NOTE: All engineering /infrastructure plans are considered conceptual during the
planning and zoning review phase and are subject to further review during the final
construction review. These non- certification comments shall be satisfied prior to
construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit.
1. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall dimension the engineering plan or provide a horizontal
control plan, which provides "complete horizontal control of the project sufficient to
construct the project and determine the dimensions of all site improvements" in accordance
with Section 78 -448 of the LDR. The applicant is advised of the following;
a. The applicant shall revise the label for the "20' R" of the south curb line of the rotary
entry drive does not coincide with the location of the 20' radius.
b. The applicant shall dimension the radius of the west curb on the south side of the rotary,
entering the parking area, is not labeled.
c. The applicant shall dimension the radius of the curb at the north handicap parking stall.
Response: The applicant has labeled and dimensioned the requested areas on the revised plan.
6. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall identify all curb ramps with the appropriate FDOT Index
304 CR numbers for each location. The applicant shall identify the curb ramp numbers for
• the handicap stall locations. The applicant is advised of the following;
FAProject Documents \06 -0820 Waterford Hotel \MAJOR AMENDMENMESPONSES\O60B20_MA_2nd Response.doc
•
Ms. Jackie Holloman
Wyndham Gardens Hotel (f.k.a. Waterford Hotel)
Response to LBFH
June 13, 2007
Page 6 of 7
a. The applicant shall clarify if the south access aisle for the handicap stalls has an existing
or proposed curb ramp. If proposed the applicant shall so label with the FDOT Index
304 CR #.
Response: The applicant has added a note to the plan to identify the proposed curb ramp with
FDOT index 304 CR #.
13. Not Satisfied. Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the applicant shall
provide a copy of the following approved permits, as applicable:
d Not Satisfied. FDOT — Applicant has provided an application for the FDOT Driveway
Connection Permit and indicates they will provide a copy of the permit upon receipt.
Response: The application with FDOT has been revised; the north driveway will now be for
emergency exit only. The plan has been revised to reflect this change. Once correspondence is
received from FDOT it will be provided to the City.
14. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall provide a cost estimate for the project, including public
• infrastructure and all landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the City in
order to establish surety. The cost estimate shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and
landscape architect registered in the state of Florida. Surety will be based on 110% of the
total combined approved cost estimates and shall be posted with the City, prior to the
issuance of the first land alteration permit.
r
SUMMARY OF ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
of Probable Construction Costs
for On -site and Off -site Public Improvements
Grading & Paving
$0.0
Sanitary Sewer
$0.0
Water
$0.0
Storm Water Maintenance
$0.0
Signing & Pavement Markin
$0.0
Subtotal
$0.0
Landscaping
Irrigation
Subtotal
Total
110 %Total Required Surety
F: \Project Documents \06 -0820 Waterford Hote11MAJOR AMENOMENrRESPONSES l060820_MA_2nd Response.doc
Ms. Jackie Holloman
Wyndham Gardens Hotel (f.k.a. Waterford Hotel)
Response to LBFH
June 13, 2007
Page 7 of 7
• The applicant indicates that a cost estimate for public improvements, including landscaping
and irrigation, was included in their submittal. However, it was not received with the
materials provided for this review.
0
Response: The landscape and irrigation cost estimate will be submitted under separate cover
before PZAB.
15. Not Satisfied. The applicant provided a cost estimate for the on -site project improvements,
not including public infrastructure, landscaping and irrigation costs (which were previously
submitted by the applicant) for review and approval by the City. The cost estimate is signed
and sealed by an engineer and shall be posted with the City prior to the issuance of the first
land alteration permit.
SUMMARY OF ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
of Probable Construction Costs
for On -site Non Public Im rovements
Grading
$58,735.0
Sanitary Sewer
$0.0
Water
$1,510.0
Storm Water Maintenance
$5,450.0
Signing & Pavement Marking
$6,778.0
otal
$72,473.0
Response: The applicant is not proposing any public infrastructure. Cost estimate for
landscape and irrigation will be provided under separate cover.
Additional Non - Certification
Items Based on Materials Received for this Review.
17. The applicant shall revise the plans to indicate an acceptable pipe material, such at RCP or
FRCP for drainage pipes under all load bearing pavement areas, with the exception of
exfiltration areas. Specifically, the line from the courtyard to the inlet in the parking area
east of the building.
Response: PBG Code 78- 524(2) states "All storm sewer pipe within public or private rights -of-
jLaj shall be reinforced concrete pipe and comply with applicable FDOT standards." This
pipe is in a private parking area, not a right -of -way.
18. The applicant shall modify the label on the site plan, referencing the paver area of the pool
deck, for consistency with the engineering plan, which indicates that the paver deck is
"existing ".
isResponse: The plan has been modified to indicate the existing paver deck.
F:%Project Documenls\06 -0820 Waterford Hotel \MAJOR AMENDMENT \RESPONSES \060820_MA_2nd Response.doc
Cotleur&
Hearing
• 1934 Commerce Lane • Suite 1 • Jupiter, Florida
•
Officer Julius Barone
Palm Beach Gardens Police Department
10500 N. Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
Landscape Architects I Land Planners 1 Environmental Consultants
33458 • Ph 561.747.6336 • Fax 561.747.1377 • Lic. #LC- C000239
May 21st, 2007
SUBJECT: Response to DRC Meeting April 12, 2007
PUDA- 07 -03- 000005 — Wyndham Gardens (a.k.a. Waterford) Hotel PUD Amendment
Dear Officer Barone:
Police Department - CPTED
Applicant shall provide a detailed Photometric Lighting Plan with types and location of
lights before the issuance of a building permit. This is to include the existing underground
parking garage. All lighting shall at minimum meet or exceed Palm Beach Gardens lighting
codes.
Response. A photometric lighting plan has been included with this resubmittal and has met
the listed requirements. The existing underground parking garage has been omitted from
the photometric plan per discussion with the City engineering department. The applicant is
not proposing to change the existing garage. The existing lighting in the garage will remain
the same. Therefore a photometric plan should not be required.
1. A combination of Metal Halide and High Pressure Sodium Vapor deluxe color lighting
shall be used for all street and pedestrian walkways (12' light poles).
Response: The photometric lighting plan as submitted complies w/ the applicable
codes and requirements.
• Lighting locations should not conflict with landscaping, (to include long term tree
canopy growth).
Response. The applicant has ensured that lighting and landscape do not conflict, up to
long term tree canopy growth.
Provide timer clock /photo cell lighting for nighttime use above or near entryways
and all exits including emergency exits.
Response: The applicant will provide timer clock/photo cell lighting for nighttime use
above or near entryways and all exits including emergency exits.
2. Building lighting shall be around perimeter of all sides and on pedestrian sidewalk
surrounding the building. Non - glare lighting luminaries shall be used.
Response: Lighting for the building has been placed around the perimeter of all sides and
on all sidewalks around the building. Non -glare lighting luminaries have been used.
3. Landscaping shall not obstruct view from windows or walkways.
Response: The landscape plan has been designed to ensure views from windows or
walkways are not obstructed.
4. Directory shall be placed at the ingress point and strategically place directory with arrow
. indicator for building at vehicle driver sight level.
Officer Julius Barone
City of Palm Beach Gardens
Wyndham Gardens Hotel
May 21st, 2007
Page 2 of 3
• Response: Not applicable. A directory is not requested or required.
5. Commercial numbering system:
Shall be illuminated for night time visibility, (photo cell) and not be obstructed by
landscaping with an uninterruptible A.C. power source.
• Shall be placed at front of building, twelve inch Arabic numerals.
• Should have bi- directional visibility from the roadway.
• Shall have roof numbers placed parallel to addressed street, visible only from
air.
Response: The numbering system will be illuminated for night time visibility and will not be
obstructed by landscape and will have an uninterruptible A.C. power source. The
numbering will be placed at the front of the building and will be 12- inches Arabic numerals.
The numbering will be bi- directional qualities to be seen from the roadway. The applicant
will place roof numbers on the building.
6. CPTED fencing (6 or 8 foot wrought — iron fencing) shall be placed on the North Side of
property line or concrete wall shall be extended to complete the surrounding perimeter.
Response: A wrought iron fence, 6 feet in height, has been added to the north property
line on the site plan.
II. Natural Surveillance
1. Provide landscaping that does not create hiding spaces.
Response: The landscape plan has been carefully contemplated to ensure that hiding
spaces are not created.
• 2. Provide clearly marked transitional zones that indicate movement from public to semipublic
through use of brick pavers.
Response: Brick pavers have been used within the courtyard area to indicate a
semipublic space. All other areas (parking area and drive aisles) have been paved and
will be open to the public.
•
3. Windows and exterior doors should be visible from parking area.
Response: All windows and exterior doors will be visible from the parking area.
4. Parking areas should be visible from windows.
Response: The entire outdoor parking area is visible from windows of the hotel.
5. Allow shrubbery to be no more than three feet high for clear visibility in vulnerable areas.
Response: All shrubbery proposed on the landscape plan has been depicted at 3 -feet or
less in vulnerable areas.
III. All Structures should be target hardened, to include but not limited to:
1. Doors shall be equipped with metal plate over thresh- hold of the locking mechanism.
Response: The applicant will equip doors with metal plate over thresh -hold of the locking
mechanism where applicable.
2. Interior rear doors to office suites shall have 180 degree peephole viewers or a vision
panel.
Response: The interior doors to office suites will have a peephole or vision panel.
FAProject Documents \06 -0820 Waterford Hotel \MAJOR AMENDMENT\RESPONSES \5.18.07 CPTED RESPONES.doc
Officer Julius Barone
City of Palm Beach Gardens
Wyndham Gardens Hotel
May 21st, 2007
Page 3 of 3
• 3. Case hardened commercial grade dead bolt locks shall be installed on all interior doors
with minimum of one inch throw into the strike receiving the bolt. The cylinder shall have
a cylinder guard and a minimum of five -pin tumblers.
Response: Case hardened commercial grade dead bolt locks will be used on all interior
doors with the applicable requirements listed here.
4. Door hinges shall be installed on interior side of door or non — removable hinge pins or a
mechanical interlock to preclude removal of door from the exterior.
Response: Door hinges will be installed on the interior side of doors to prevent external
removal of doors.
5. Doors secured by electrical operation shall have a keyed- switch to open the door when in
a closed position, or by a signal locking device.
Response: The electrical glass doors will have a keyed- switch to open the door when
closed.
6. Glazing in interior doors, or 40 inches within of any locking device shall be rated burglary
resistant glazing.
Response: Any interior door glazing will be burglary resistant.
7. Enhance natural surveillance of restrooms by placing them in central areas and reduce
number of tenants sharing a common restroom. Install maze entrances; avoid double
door entry systems.
Response: Restrooms are not being proposed within the lobby addition.
8. It is strongly recommended a digital CCTV system be installed to monitor all pedestrian
• activity including underground parking garage.
Response: The applicant has installed a camera system to monitor all pedestrian activity
on the site (including the garage).
9. Stairwells shall have shatter resistant mirrors at each landing and enclose or restrict
access to areas beneath stairway at ground level.
Response: Mirrors will be added in each stairwell. Areas under stairwells have been
blocked. Please note, cameras are also located in stairwells.
10. All hatchway openings to roof shall be secured from inside with a slide bolt or slide bars.
Outside hinges shall be equipped with non - removable pins.
Response: Hatchway openings on the roof are secured from inside and outside hinges
are equipped with non - removable pins.
On behalf of the applicant, please accept these responses to your DRC comments. Please contact me
with any questions directly at (561) 747 -6336 x 128. .
Regards,
Alessandria Kalfin
Land Planner
Cotleur & Hearing, Inc.
FAProject Documents \06 -0820 Waterford Hotel\MAJOR AMENDMENT\RESPONSES \5.18.07 CPTED RESPONES.doc
bc
• INC.
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS,
SURVEYORS & MAPPERS
CIVIL
P AGRICULTURAL
WATER RESOURCES
ER & WASTEWATER
TRANSPORTATION
SURVEY & MAPPING
GIS
"Partners For Results
Value By Design"
0 S.W. Corporate Pkwy.
Palm City, FL 34990
(772) 286 -3883
Fax (772) 286 -3925
www.lbfh.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jackie Holloman
FROM: Jim Orth, P.E.
DATE: July 25, 2007
FILE NO. 16792
SUBJECT: Waterford Hotel
PUD Review
PUDA- 07 -03 -05
ip p4{ ;pi L
&41 Or- PALM, �, 18l
We have reviewed the following plans and information for the above referenced
project received July 15, 2007:
• Copy of Permit Submittal to FDOT dated July 16, 2007 prepared by Michael B
Schorah & Associates, Inc.
• Copy of Development Plan dated July 16, 2007 prepared by Michael B Schorah
& Associates, Inc.
In addition to the following plans and information received July 19, 2007:
• Applicant's Response to our Prior Comment Memorandum of June 7, 2007,
dated July 13, 2007 prepared by Cotleur & Hearing
• Engineer's Cost Estimate for Non Public Improvements dated (signed) July 12,
2007 prepared by Michael B Schorah & Associates, Inc.
• Conceptual Engineering Plan dated (signed) July 13, 2007 prepared by Michael
B Schorah & Associates, Inc.
• Development Plan (Sheet 1 of 3)
• Paving & Drainage Details (Sheet 2 & 3 of 3)
• Photometric Plan (Sheet E0.3 thru E0.6) dated (signed) July 13, 2007 prepared
by International Consulting Engineers, Inc.
• Site Plan dated (revised) July 13, 2007 prepared by Cotleur Hearing
■ Site Plan (Sheet 1 of 5)
■ Site Detail /Amenity Plan (Sheet 2 of 5)
■ Landscape Plan (Sheet 3 of 5)
■ Landscape Details (Sheet 4 & 5 of 5)
■ Site Plan Area Calculations (Sheet 1 of 1)
• Preliminary Architectural Plan undated prepared by Ames Design International.
• Site Plan (Sheet Pl)
• Floor Plan (Sheet P2 & P3)
• Building Street Elevations (Sheet P5)
• Building Elevations (Sheet P6)
• Floor Plan (Egress) (Sheet 6)
PA\PBGMEM0\16792 \16792 - 20070725 - PUDA- 07- 03- 005.doc
PINC.
•
•
Waterford Hotel
LBFH File No. 16792
We have the following comments:
Page 2 of 10
• The applicant proposes to return the building, located on a 1.87 acre site south
of PGA Blvd on the east side of USH 1, to its original configuration by
removing the restaurant and increasing from 77 to 90 rooms. The applicant
indicates that the work is to include:
• Structural addition between exiting buildings to provide new entry, central
lobby and drop off area.
• Fagade improvements to existing buildings.
• New courtyard to be located between existing buildings as site amenity.
• Minor vehicle area modifications.
• A second exit to USH 1.
• The applicant has previously provided a Traffic Impact Analysis, dated
February 2, 2007, prepared by Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc. which we
forwarded to the City's traffic engineer and PBC Traffic Division for review.
We previously forward their comments to the City on July 17, 2007.
Certification Issues
Comments 1 thru 3 Previously Satisfied.
4. Not Satisfied. The applicant dimensioned the elements of the plan including;
the radii of the entry rotary area, the entrance drive to the underground parking,
etc. for conformance with Section 78 -46 of the LDR. However;
a. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall revise the walk width, which is shown on
the engineering plan to be four (4') feet wide, to be a minimum five (5')
foot clear walk, measured from the back of curb, for conformance to the
requirements of Section 78 -230 of the LDR.
The walk north of the fountain plaza (Sheet 1) is identified to be four (4')
feet wide. The applicant shall revise the walk dimension.
b. Satisfied. The applicant dimensioned the sidewalk abutting the handicap
stalls, on the east side of the building, for conformance with Section 78 -230
of the LDR.
c. Satisfied. The applicant revised the architectural plan (Sheet P2), landscape
plan, engineering plan, site plan and photometric plan for consistency, along
the rotary, north of the garage entrance.
5. Conditionally Satisfied. While the applicant clarified the size of the loading
area (Sheet 1 of 5), which does not scale to agree with the requirements of
Section 78 -362 of the LDR. The applicant notes that the space was not
constructed in compliance with the previous approval, which required the
loading space size be 12' x 35' per the LDR. However, the applicant is
PAP13GMEMO \16792 \16792 - 20070725 - PUDA- 07- 03- 005.doc
Waterford Hotel Page 3 of 10
LBFH File No. 16792
INS.
requesting a waiver to permit the utilization of the current 10.5' x 32.5' loading
0 space as shown.
We show this item conditionally satisfied, pending resolution of the applicant's
request for a waiver.
6. Previously Satisfied.
7. Satisfied. The applicant has provided a detail conforming to the MUTCD sign
guidelines, on the site plan detail page (Sheet 2 of 5).
Comment 8 thru 16 Previously Satisfied.
17. Not Satisfied. The applicant provided a signed and sealed photometric plan for
compliance with Ordinance 26, 2006 and the City's lighting policy, which
amends Section 78 -182 and Section 78 -751 of the LDR. However,
(a,. a. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall provide certified test results that the
- +�Qr`0� parking garage meets the current code or a remediation plan, with a
photometric otometric plan, which meets current code.
P �Aa 5'&—
i. The applicant shall revise the "Statistics" table to show both day and
night lighting levels for the garage.
• ii. The applicant shall provide separate lighting level data, in the
"Statistics" table, for the following areas of the project; pedestrian areas,
parking stall areas, drive aisles, ramps, stairwells, vehicle entrance area
and pedestrian entry areas. The following data shall be specified; the
minimum fc, maximum fc, average fc, max /min ratio, avg/min ratio,
minimum average fc maintained, maximum average fc maintained,
minimum initial fc.
b. The applicant shall clarify whether calculations refer to "maintained" or
"initial" footcandles
c. The applicant shall clarify whether calculations refer to "horizontal" or
"vertical" footcandles
d. The applicant shall revise the "Statistics" table to agree with the information
required by Ordinance 26, 2006 and the City's lighting standards, which are
based on the IESNA design standards. Specifically:
i. For the interior of the parking garage;
1) The applicant shall identify the minimum average maintained, which
• shall not be less than 3.0 fc per Ordinance 26, 2006.
PAPBGMEM0\16792 \16792 - 20070725 - PUDA- 07- 03- 005.doc
Waterford Hotel Page 4 of 10
LBFH File No. 16792
INC.
2) The applicant shall identify the maximum average maintained,
• which shall not be more than 50.0 fc per Ordinance 26, 2006.
3) The applicant shall identify the minimum initial fc required, which
shall not be less than 1.0 fc per the City's lighting standard. This
does not include other areas noted, such as within stairwells.
c. The applicant shall revise the "Statistics" table for conformance with
Ordinance 26, 2006 and the City's lighting standards. The applicant is
advised that;
i. During the daytime, the vehicular and pedestrian exits and entrances
must maintain a minimum average of 50 fc.
ii. Stairwells must maintain 10 fc minimum initial light level (Florida
Building Code), as well as a minimum average of 20 fc 24 hours a day
(City lighting standards).
iii. Ramps, drive aisles, and all other areas of the garage must maintain a
minimum average of 3.0 fc.
d. The applicant shall identify the lighting levels for the walk areas for all
public entrances of the parking garage and stairwells, which shall conform
• to Ordinance 26, 2006 and the City's lighting standards.
18. Satisfied. The photometric plan shall identify the proposed lighting levels, as
noted in Table 1 of said Ordinance 26, 2006, of the drive lanes and parking
stalls, portico, pedestrian use areas (including walks and open space, pool,
deck, courtyard area) and the parking garage, etc. However, the applicant shall
provide the following, for conformance with said Ordinance 26, 2006 and the
City's lighting standards.
a. Satisfied. The applicant provided lighting level data for the pedestrian use
areas including;
i. All walkways and pathways (to back of walk/path).
ii. The accessible route from USH 1 to the entry and along the west side of
the garage.
b. Satisfied. The applicant revised the numeric summary to indicate separate
values for the pedestrian areas, in addition to the property line, parking area
and pool area which are shown.
c. Satisfied. The applicant clarified the illumination proposed for the
• courtyard area.
P:\PBGMEMO \16792 \16792 - 20070725 - PUDA- 07- 03- 005.doc
lbf Waterford Hotel Page 5 of 10
LBFH File No. 16792
hC.
L_J
•
•
d. Satisfied. The applicant clarified that the courtyard is to be accessible to the
hotel guests.
e. Satisfied. The applicant clarified the illumination proposed for the
courtyard area.
f. Satisfied. The applicant revised the engineering plan, site plan and
landscape plan for consistency with the photometric plans as to the
proposed location of lighting fixtures.
19. Previously Satisfied.
20. Satisfied. The applicant provided a sign to identify that the ingress traffic is to
keep right at the rotary (Sheet 1 of 5). However, the following is noted;
a. Satisfied. The applicant relocated the "Do Not Enter" sign to the rotary
island for better visibility to entering traffic.
Comments 21 & 22 Previously Satisfied.
23. Satisfied. The applicant verified that the proposed CR -10 ramp (Sheet 1 of 3),
for the front entry drop off area, conforms to the requirements noted in FDOT
Index 304.
a. Satisfied. The applicant revised the architectural plan for consistency with
the engineering, site plan and landscape plan, regarding the curb ramp.
Comments 24 thru 26 Previously Satisfied.
Waiver Requests
1. The applicant is requesting a waiver from Section 78 -344 of the LDR regarding
parking stall widths. Please note we remain in support of the City's LDR
requirements.
2. The applicant is requesting a waiver from Section 78 -153 of the LDR regarding
setback requirements. Please note we remain in support of the City's LDR
requirements.
3. The applicant is requesting a waiver from Section 78 -153 of the LDR regarding
building height. Please note we remain in support of the City's LDR
requirements.
4. The applicant is requesting a waiver from Section 78 -186 of the LDR regarding
landscape buffer for commercial parcel abutting residential parcel. Please note
we remain in support of the City's LDR requirements.
P:\PBGMEMO \16792 \16792 - 20070725 - PUDA- 07- 03- 005.doc
Waterford Hotel Page 6 of 10
L LBFH File No. 16792
h
5. Previous Waiver Request Withdrawn by Applicant. The applicant is
• requesting a waiver from Section 78 -80 of the LDR regarding requirement for
topographic map with one (1') foot contours. Please note we remain in support
of the City's LDR requirements.
The applicant has provided a topographic map with spot elevations.
Additional Waiver Requests
6. The applicant is requesting a waiver from Section 78 -362 of the LDR regarding
a 12' x 35' loading zone with a 12' x 35' maneuvering area. The applicant is
proposing to utilize the existing 10.5' x 32.5' loading zone (as noted in
Certification Comment #5). Please note we remain in support of the City's LDR
requirements.
Non - Certification Issues
NOTE: All engineering/infrastructure plans are considered conceptual during
the planning and zoning review phase and are subject to further review during
the final construction review. These non - certification comments shall be
satisfied prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land
alteration permit.
• 1. Satisfied. The applicant shall dimension the engineering plan or provide a
horizontal control plan, which provides "complete horizontal control of the
project sufficient to construct the project and determine the dimensions of all
site improvements" in accordance with Section 78 -448 of the LDR. The
applicant is advised of the following;
a. Satisfied. The applicant revised the label for the "20' R" of the south curb
line of the rotary entry drive does not coincide with the location of the 20'
radius.
b. Satisfied. The applicant dimensioned the radius of the west curb on the
south side of the rotary, entering the parking area, is not labeled.
c. Satisfied. The applicant dimensioned the radius of the curb at the north
handicap parking stall.
Comments 2 thru 5 Previously Satisfied.
6. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall identify all curb ramps with the appropriate
FDOT Index 304 CR numbers for each location. The applicant shall identify the
curb ramp numbers for the handicap stall locations. The applicant is advised of
the following;
•
P:\PBGMEMO \16792 \16792 - 20070725 - PUDA- 07- 03- 005.doc
hINC.
U
•
Waterford Hotel
LBFH File No. 16792
Page 7 of 10
a. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall clarify if the south access aisle for the
handicap stalls has an existing or proposed curb ramp. If proposed the
applicant shall so label with the FDOT Index 304 CR #.
The applicant identifies the curb ramp to be a CR #3. However, the
CR #3 has a back curb. As the accessible entry walk to the building is at
this point, a CR #3 will not provide handicap accessibility to the
building. The applicant shall revise the ramp designation to provide
handicap accessibility.
Comments 7 thru 11 Previously Satisfied.
12. Previously Satisfied. The applicant has indicated the structural numbers for the
`Asphalt Section' details on the Engineering Detail Sheet in accordance with
Section 78 -499 Table 41 of the LDR. The applicant provided a table indicating
the layer, material, LBRIFBV, material thickness, FDOT layer coefficient; the
SN for the pavement section, base section, and subgrade section; and the total
SN for the total pavement section and the required SN in accordance with the
FDOT Flexible Design Manual.
a. Previously Satisfied. The applicant previously revised their SN data on the
plan for consistency with the proposed SN of 4.52 as noted in the FDOT
ROW — USH 1 table above.
13. Not Satisfied. Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit, the
applicant shall provide a copy of the following approved permits, as applicable:
a. Not Applicable. SFWMD — Applicant indicates that project fall under "No
Notice" rule.
PAPBGMEM0\16792 \16792 - 20070725 - PUDA- 07- 03- 005.doc
hINC�
U
U
•
Waterford Hotel Page 8 of 10
LBFH File No. 16792
b. Not Applicable. NPBCID — Applicant indicates this project is not within
NPBCID.
c. Not Applicable. PBC - Applicant indicates this project is "Not Applicable."
d. Not Satisfied. FDOT — Applicant has provided an application for the FDOT
Driveway Connection Permit and indicates they will provide a copy of the
permit upon receipt.
e. Not Applicable. PBC Health Department/FDEP- Applicant indicates this
project is "Not Applicable."
f. Not Applicable. NPDES- Applicant indicates this project is "Not
Applicable ", as construction activities of the project totals less than one (1)
acre.
14. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall provide a cost estimate for the project,
including public infrastructure and all landscaping and irrigation costs for
review and approval by the City in order to establish surety. The cost estimate
shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and landscape architect registered in
the state of Florida. Surety will be based on 110% of the total combined
approved cost estimates and shall be posted with the City, prior to the issuance
of the first land alteration permit.
SUMMARY OF ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
of Probable Construction Costs
for On -site and Off -site Public Improvements
Grading & Paving
$0.0
Sanitary Sewer
$0.0
Water
$0.0
Storm Water Maintenance
$0.0
Signing & Pavement Markin
$0.0
Subtotal
$0.0
Landscaping
Irrigation
Subtotal
Total
110 %Total Required Surety
The applicant indicates that there will be no public infrastructure and the
landscape cost estimate will be submitted under separate cover. This item will
remain unsatisfied until the landscaping cost estimate is received and reviewed
by the City.
15. Satisfied. The applicant provided a cost estimate for the on -site project
improvements, not including public infrastructure, landscaping and irrigation
costs (which were previously submitted by the applicant) for review and
approval by the City. The cost estimate is signed and sealed by an engineer and
shall be posted with the City prior to the issuance of the first land alteration
permit.
P:\PBGMEMO \16792 \16792 - 20070725 - PUDA- 07- 03- 005.doc
hINC,
U
•
•
Waterford Hotel
LBFH File No. 16792
SUMMARY OF ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE
of Probable Construction Costs
for On -site Non Public Im rovements
Grading
$56,059.5
Sanitary Sewer
$0.0
Water
$1,840.0
Storm Water Maintenance
$5,450.00
Signing & Pavement Marking
$8,578.
otal
$71,927.5
16. Previously Satisfied.
Page 9 of 10
17. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall revise the plans to indicate an acceptable
pipe material, such at RCP or FRCP for drainage pipes under all load bearing
pavement areas, with the exception of exfiltration areas. Specifically, the line
from the courtyard to the inlet in the parking area east of the building.
City policy requires RCP under all load bearing surfaces. The applicant shall
revise the plans to so indicate.
18. Satisfied. The applicant modified the label on the site plan, referencing the
paver area of the pool deck, for consistency with the engineering plan, which
indicates that the paver deck is "existing ".
Conditions of Approval
1. "Applicant shall copy to the City all permit applications, permits, certifications
and approvals. " (City Engineer)
2. "Applicant shall provide all necessary construction zone signage and fencing
as required by the City Engineer. " (City Engineer)
3. "Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land
alteration permit, applicant shall provide a cost estimate and surety in
accordance with LDR Section 78 -309 and 78 -461 and a cost estimate for on-
site project improvements, not including public infrastructure, or landscaping
and irrigation costs for review and approval by the City. The cost estimates
shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and landscape architect registered in
the state of Florida and shall be posted with the City, prior to the issuance of
the first land alteration permit. " (City Engineer)
4. "The construction, operation and /or maintenance of any elements of the subject
project shall not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage of
surrounding areas. If, at any time during the project development, it is
determined by the City that any of the surrounding areas are experiencing
negative drainage impacts caused by the project, it shall be the applicant's
responsibility to cure said impacts in a period of time and a manner acceptable
to the City prior to additional construction activities. " (City Engineer)
P:\PBGMEMO \16792 \16792 - 20070725 - PUDA- 07- 03- 005.doc
Waterford Hotel Page 10 of 10
LBFH File No. 16792
INC.
5. "Prior to issuance of the first land alteration permit, applicant shall submit
• signed/sealedldated construction plans (paving /grading /drainage and
water /sewer) and all pertinent calculations for review and comment. (City
Engineer)
6. "Applicant shall comply with any and all Palm Beach County Traffic Division
conditions as outlined in PBC Traffic Division equivalency and concurrency
approval letters. " (City Engineer)
7. "Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land
alteration permit, applicant shall schedule a pre - permit meeting with City
staff. " (City Engineer)
8. "Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit the applicant shall
provide to the City letters of authorization from the applicable utility companies
allowing landscaping and light poles to be placed within the utility easements. "
(City Engineer)
9. "Applicant shall notify the City's Public Works Division at least 10 working
days prior to the commencement of any worklconstruction activity within any
public right -of -way within the City of Palm Beach Gardens. In the case of a city
right -of -way, the applicant has at least five working days to obtain a right -of-
way permit. Right -of -way permits may be obtained at the Building Division.
• Failure to comply with this condition could result in a Stop Work Order of all
worklconstruction activity within the public right -of -way and the subject
development site. " (Public Works)
The applicant is requested to return a copy of our comments with the
applicant's acknowledgement of each comment and the response. Compliance
will expedite the subsequent review.
The applicant is reminded that all submittals are to be made to the City of
Palm Beach Gardens Growth Management Department.
JRO /mef
cc: Todd Miller — Palm Beach Gardens (tmiller@pbgfl.com)
•
PAP13GMEMO \16792 \16792 - 20070725 - PUDA- 07- 03- 005.doc
LbF
hINC.
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS,
SURVEYORS & MAPPERS
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jackie Holloman
FROM: Jim Orth, P.E.
DATE: July 17, 2007
FILE NO. 16792
SUBJECT: Waterford Hotel
Traffic Impact Analysis
Palm Beach County Traffic Division and the City's traffic consultant, MTP Group,
Inc., have completed their coordinated review of the Traffic Impact Analysis for the
above referenced project prepared by Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc. dated
February 2, 2007 and received March 22, 2007 pursuant to the Palm Beach County
Traffic Performance Standards and the City of Palm Beach Gardens Land
Development Regulations for the above referenced project. Their review concludes
that the based on the information included in the traffic impact analysis, the project
is in compliance with the City of Palm Beach Gardens Development Regulations.
Additionally,
CIVIL
The build out date is December 31, 2008.
AGRICULTURAL
ATER RESOURCES
WER
& WASTEWATER
A copy of Palm Beach County Traffic Division's comment memorandum, dated
TRANSPORTATION
April 20, 2007 is attached, along with a copy of MTP Group's coordinated
SURVEY & MAPPING
comment memorandum dated April 19, 2007.
GIS
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate
to contact me at (561) 799 -4129.
JOR/mef
"Partners For Results
Value By Design"
cc: Todd Miller — Palm Beach Gardens (tmiller @pbgfl.com)
Maria Tejera — MTP Group — (mtejera @mtpgroup.net)
Masoud Atefi — PBCTD (matefi @co.palm - beach.fl.us)
OF PAL'1A B C H G )N
�ITY
0 S.W. Corporate Pk
r O
1 2�
Palm City, FL 34990
(772) 286 -3883
Fax (772) 286 -3925
��,''
I�y�� }!I� *y�; 1~�l6
.. t.,
www.lbfh.com
PA\P13GMEM0\16792 \16792 - 20070717 - MTP comments to City.doc
� G e�� �,AC$ C
LORI�/
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
P.O. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, FL 33416•1229
(561)684.4000
Fax: (561)000.0000
www.pbcgov.com
8
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
ddie L Greene. Chairperson
0 Jeff Koons, vice Chair
•
Karen T. Marcus
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Jess R. Santamaria
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
'An h-quul Opprrum'),
rl / %irinnn i •e : tr'ni�n /:bip;or •�• "
prin too on recycled paper
April 20, 2007
Ms. Judy Dye
Assistant City Engineer
City of Palm Beach Gardens
3550 S.W. Corporate Pkwy.
Palm City, FL 34990
RE: Waterford Hotel Restaurant
Project #: 070332
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Ms. Dye:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement for the
proposed hotel expansion project entitled; Waterford Hotel Restaurant, pursuant to the
Traffic Performance Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land
Development Code. The project is summarized as follows:
Location: East of US -1 South of PGA Boulevard,
Municipality: Palm Beach Gardens
Existing Uses: 77 Rooms Hotel, and 1,710 SF Quality Restaurant (to be closed) — in
place for over 5 years.
Proposed Uses: Addition of 13 Rooms — total 90 Rooms Hotel
New Daily Trips: Trip Reduction
New PH Trips: 7 AM and Trip Reduction PM
Build -out Year: 2008
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the proposed change does
not have a significant impact on the adjacent roadway network, and therefore, meets the
Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. The County traffic concurrency
approval is subject to the Project Aggregation Rules set forth in the Traffic Performance
St9 dards Orriinl ce If yo,-- hcvs un.r qucsti rely rd!ng this -+eter.nination. l.ea:.-.
._.n -.... n..-.. � •� y.,,,,,,.OriJ ��.yc:�vu�y i�n;i u'v.Cinuuu�,vi�, riGUOG
contact me at 684 -4030.
Sincerely,
/ 1
Masoud Atefi, MSCE
TPS Administrator - ffic Division
CC: Kimley -Horn & Associates, Inc.
MTP Group
File: General - TPS • Mun - Traffic Study Review
F: \TRAFFIC \ma\Admin\Approvals \2007 \070332.doc
0 Memo to File
To: Jackie Holloman, Planner
Through: Mark Hendrickson, City Forester
From: Ray Caranci, Forestry Technician
Subject: PUDA- 03 -07 -05 Waterford Hotel Resubmittal2
Date: June 5, 2007
I have reviewed the Land Development Regulations for the above referenced petition and
provide the following comments:
1. Several existing trees are not shown on the landscape plan that are directly
affected by the proposed alterations to the paved areas. Please indicate and
identify all trees that will be within the scope of construction, and indicate
whether they will be removed or relocated. The mature royal palms at the front of
the building and behind the monument sign are of special concern. There is also
• one oak tree that is directly in the path of the proposed northern exit. Satisfied.
2. In accordance with section 78- 320(a) (4) c. of the LDR, non residential buildings
shall have at least one shade tree or palm cluster installed for each 30 linear feet,
or fraction thereof, of fagade width. Trees and palms shall be of an installed size
relating to the height of the adjacent wall or fagade, as indicated in Table 30.
Please revise the landscape plan to include the required number of trees. or palm
clusters for the west fagade of the north building. We would suggest utilizing the
existing mature Royal palms. Satisfied.
3. In accordance with Section 78 -315 (b) of the LDR, landscape islands are required
for every nine parking spaces located in a row. There are existing diamond
planters located around the parking lot edge that should be utilized at this time to
fulfill this requirement. Also, there are three landscape diamonds abutting the rear
of the pool area that should be shown on the plan with palms or shrubs indicated
in them. Satisfied.
4. In accordance with Section 78 -305 (c) 7 d.[78 -287 (c)] of the LDR, landscaping
requirements for signs, minimum widths of front and side landscaping should
equal the height of the sign. Please provide details to verify the landscape area is
adequate. Satisfied.
is
5. The sizes of the Coconut palms do not meet the minimum required height of 8
• feet GW. Please revise the plan to increase their size to the minimum required.
Satisfied. Given that these have been indicated as relocated existing palms.
6. Please indicate what will be covering the ground in the courtyard area. If it is to
be sod, please label it as such. Satisfied.
7. Please provide a note on cleaning up or replacing any existing landscaping that is
damaged or unhealthy. Mulch is required in all landscaped areas. Satisfied.
Also, please understand that additional information may be requested, and staff may have
additional comments as the review process continues.
•
is
ii
o>
ftl G, y.
1]
0
Mz
U11Y OF PALM;` K" GARDENFS'i
10500 N. MILITARY TRAIL PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 334104698
FIRE RESCUE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jackie Holloman, Planner DATE: July 18, 2007
APPROVED:
FROM: Scott Fetterman, Deputy Chief
RE: PUDA- 070 -3- 000005: Waterford/Wyndham Gardens Hotel
Fire Rescue has reviewed the above referenced revised PUD Amendment
petition and has no adverse comments or concerns. Thank you for your assistance
and consideration in this matter. Please contact me if you have any questions or
any future changes are proposed.
I
PALM BEACH GARDENS POLICE DEPARTMENT
SPECIAL OPERATIONS BUREAU
0
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JACKIE HOLLOMAN, AICP PLANNER
FROM: OFFICER JULES BARONE /OFFICER TARA HEADMAN
SUBJECT: WATERFORD HOTEL PUD AMENDMENT 07 -03- 000005
DATE: JULY 18, 2007
The police department has reviewed the applicant's re- submittal package dated July 17, 2007.
The police department has no adverse comments provided the applicant adheres to all the
previously discussed CPTED requirements including a security site plan which shall be
submitted to the police department prior to commencement of construction.
•
cc: Chief S. Stepp
Files
•
.7
July 20, 2007
Ms. Jackie Holloman
Planning & Zoning Division
City of Palm Beach Gardens
10500 North Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
RE: Waterford/Wyndham Garden Hotel PUD Amendment
Dear Ms. Holloman:
We offer the following comment on your transmittal dated July 17, 2007 concerning the
referenced project. The applicant needs to revise the landscape plans and provide a root
• barrier at the backflow preventer and meter located in the southerly Seacoast easement.
Please call if you require additional information.
Sincerely,
SEACOAST UTILITY AUTHORITY
Bruce Gregg
Director of Operations
M
cc: R. Bishop
J. Callaghan
J. Lance
J. Orth
•
0 0 0
JIM
M
Fri
ZS
a.
■
a
w
j
_m p
■ a /
•�a
i4
Y
Z
Wyndham Garden Hote /o�
c N' mm � ♦ J
o
LI
88
Addition Renovation
D
a v.
Vie'
Palm 8 each Gardens, FL
� m oQ
>
� y
xxT� i� €tNssiom
y"'�`mm nY m
S n
R
S
M �T
" � W
Y fv
U.S. HIGHWAY 1 O .
P IF3
n W —I• o `� J
I�
z `\o
S
z
rncN
C
U.S.H /GH IAY1 - - - - - -_
Ai
o he ��♦ - ♦ 3 //��
n
z I 1
�N� �: � (��� ._� »a✓ v� . � III �o II _
y 9 cN -
�'
0
L II
-
1
L- N_
p g -81A a
4 f m g a p )Z v P m
1 ig o T�� __ N u m 9 ti lu
ti ml li g ? SAC Ro oL'Z
Gzi 7o Ac
C �
o Dr Z n
-
+ r� L) `
y � 1 I�..- I T i Z II
�
o c II
$ II
' NC V t Q
AL 0 II -II
OK �J
i P c (2 �--V
a'
W"
$��°
�Ap s
?� 0
` O
W
Q
� >I
1 �
' � I
I I
I
I
S �
I � i
I
IVO "5/'507 793,08'
a
n�
0
=z
g �O
' m S Ch .0 -1 V <o Nm m0 V r -I<NmI- a 20 '� z z; mm�
nO�D vD O (o�"^.Z1pc3 cam0 Or^mc O com O ccy xx5o
7pC D c �' (� T m O m C -Tn Z< D m o m O F m m D
A m m f7 r C1
2 (� O rmo-C 2
rmnNrvF zN� o�> xczio ONnNm a �Om $rAS3 a OOm cszi Gl
nCa�i X00 �a 1, m I ,mO -',O�Z A CD (n 2z
i Zm rc- D 0 m m 0 2aC 602
In c- 10 c m
m�L+'m�>"+ c� D An m ➢ m A D ZmG1 Yr'i
�� q
y_ Ne n
i y z
Fj D
m W
D O
>
0 a A
r2 a C so ca-
-z o�m m _
N ; A
O A
Im T T VI y T N �' d
zn6�z pz9' O 00000D oOOD
n V, °rnli+0 vin
Q m
- N
v vs
ai C, om
�T�
I�
ado m
m
O
Z A N
z
C
N"
N 2
OmF
mP 0
Wymllum Gardens Hotel
N
F
D
Az C
- --
mT
Ox
N
��
N
yz <
0
y V F
Q�0
in
--
DQ' m
m
Qo m
¢!Nn
In
Ng�
c
mWo
N z
JwgW
N
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
^' m
jjrx
A
y
� ODO A
m y
3
I
N
c
v
F-
mn r
m'o
n m
; �
�
N
Ic 0
� _ IM
M�-8
ZX
�n1
NO pp
N
m
���p777 m
�
np
np�p
0
0 C
4
V
z
it y
O
R
S
M �T
" � W
Y fv
U.S. HIGHWAY 1 O .
P IF3
n W —I• o `� J
I�
z `\o
S
z
rncN
C
U.S.H /GH IAY1 - - - - - -_
Ai
o he ��♦ - ♦ 3 //��
n
z I 1
�N� �: � (��� ._� »a✓ v� . � III �o II _
y 9 cN -
�'
0
L II
-
1
L- N_
p g -81A a
4 f m g a p )Z v P m
1 ig o T�� __ N u m 9 ti lu
ti ml li g ? SAC Ro oL'Z
Gzi 7o Ac
C �
o Dr Z n
-
+ r� L) `
y � 1 I�..- I T i Z II
�
o c II
$ II
' NC V t Q
AL 0 II -II
OK �J
i P c (2 �--V
a'
W"
$��°
�Ap s
?� 0
` O
W
Q
� >I
1 �
' � I
I I
I
I
S �
I � i
I
IVO "5/'507 793,08'
a
n�
0
=z
g �O
' m S Ch .0 -1 V <o Nm m0 V r -I<NmI- a 20 '� z z; mm�
nO�D vD O (o�"^.Z1pc3 cam0 Or^mc O com O ccy xx5o
7pC D c �' (� T m O m C -Tn Z< D m o m O F m m D
A m m f7 r C1
2 (� O rmo-C 2
rmnNrvF zN� o�> xczio ONnNm a �Om $rAS3 a OOm cszi Gl
nCa�i X00 �a 1, m I ,mO -',O�Z A CD (n 2z
i Zm rc- D 0 m m 0 2aC 602
In c- 10 c m
m�L+'m�>"+ c� D An m ➢ m A D ZmG1 Yr'i
�� q
y_ Ne n
i y z
Fj D
m W
D O
>
0 a A
r2 a C so ca-
-z o�m m _
N ; A
O A
Im T T VI y T N �' d
zn6�z pz9' O 00000D oOOD
n V, °rnli+0 vin
Q m
- N
v vs
ai C, om
�T�
I�
ado m
° �Nm TT
Wymllum Gardens Hotel
�3
dS
� _
E4;7Y��t
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
g"
jjrx
3
OCi
LL
0
Ln
—4
A m
C
C3
C
o
1 .1YA X n •
T—
ADM
jig,
mA
CP
'4
or
Waterford Hotel
6, 3
rn .3 1�
LL
0
Ln
—4
A m
C
C3
C
o
1 .1YA X n •
T—
N
ZZ
� Fm-
61
as
R
f
0
— --- 1�
i
---1
.X Ow
�
k
O
as
Ij
ADM
jig,
'4
or
Waterford Hotel
6, 3
rn .3 1�
Cn
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
J�
J
N
ZZ
� Fm-
61
as
R
f
0
— --- 1�
i
---1
.X Ow
�
k
O
as
Ij
ADM
jig,
'4
or
Waterford Hotel
6, 3
rn .3 1�
Cn
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
J�
n
d
��e�� � y We•g�trrg � .. WWI
x
8as33.ya €�as�a2�c�6$Lj�g�
1-.1114
i 11 i
Jill
F
HM 91 g � 1
° dj� €
wwww ?gwwww+ q -• �
'yY
ww�uiy ;uuNUU - nO,YOw
"Y ~o 777 >y�
Nil
°
N.
v
r`4w
9
$Q�
-- I
�I
I
4 ti I 1i.
1.
YYYY ttYYYY YY MY T »t > T \ I
o or op NMpoo �^�^oo �^oo �n NInM��lr in i>n NNNH i T� I c�S
' 2
� I
$ I
5 &g �Y •� > ,•may- R ego R yy a vVV`JJJ
a I:
S LS n
A
R � H a \ g
FF
R�
g�
Nil
Cu J11
o°
coc�
9�
d
I
II
N �
0
r`
` V
RCN
U.S. H/GYMAY 1
M p 9
U.S. HIGHWAY O
AWLJN
L
C v
cn
i
3
3�N
�cn
cn`
�n
> v
>�5go T
_b \
z>
°s
015
o �
0
i
m
a >d n
' ; W
► a�
Wyndham Gardens Hotel
0 ^,
w� �� � 3� C° °
�' 3 �
,o � Yw��
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
DL 3D
Ul
to rzi Z
Z
n
O
:Z
A
b
1
A
2
z
m
W
-0� m
m
�x
D�
C7R
>
DZ
rC
G1D
`—�1
LO emu'
n�
mm
D �D
vJ
'arnn
ii
�I
II
N C)) T
C
vb
•
op.
O
�
I I
I I
I I
ti
I I
I I
I I
I
D
�
cv'i, c`n C
n) D
cn (p 0?5
D
�(n
(P m
`D �3D,GZl
O Z3
n D
O
G)
O
z
4 $b ;Rg R mRm g g° 30 4 fgg£ qg�§
�
'i i $a2
09 18
IMP
q
9
M H
14 fP a _ 29
Q
A Q i 5a S ��
o v € c� �o3a T
R r � � 8 ,� � �s °� R
T�-
Samwi gi
$ egg Po�Go "m4S
�i� 4 4 $ �ej
iE
^p� _�
-2 jig
�i
m
O
I8
I;
A
Wynclham Garalens Hotel
C, "T
J8. 3 lV
_3 R>
1
m
'1
Ln
o9
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
S CD
v € -'�
Y'bMg��
z
N
co
d
�a
00
�i -1P �.AEa
Ill- III
'11111 r 1P �
i1.I
_�
O
M.a
a aF Q
M
M
v
O
M
q
O
z
0
M
D
rh
Zi � E sL 1
1Tj : Ee
e
z R:
rn � 15
Z �
O
O
ti
r
D
�7
O
M
M
M
M
m
D
z
z
O
�e S fiR n�ri
n4�4
z
n
N
Telc
Ego —>
gam.
dR " " =x g 9A
yt;x
C .7
5�re
as
�o
>11 ¢t`
ix a
�Cf a §Eat
5�
i
O
y
N
T�
N
M
M
v
Wynalliam Gardens Hotel
s =� R3 �
O
M
zJ
n
..Q
O
z
0
M
D
F
E
9x
n
N
Telc
Ego —>
gam.
dR " " =x g 9A
yt;x
C .7
5�re
as
�o
>11 ¢t`
ix a
�Cf a §Eat
5�
i
O
y
N
a1�
F �+
8�
Wa:i
Wynalliam Gardens Hotel
s =� R3 �
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
.._
..Q
a1�
F �+
8�
Wynalliam Gardens Hotel
s =� R3 �
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
.._
�i
-Jqj
O
m
z
D
n
m
O
z �
m
0 u)
n �
D D
� n
M m
O Cn
U) O
I
� � I
'I I
I 10
I o
m
I D
I
I
I I
AI
a
e R IF
4 : R
O
D
r
V)
m
D
m
D
v
m
O
v
m
O
C
n
Jill,
WyndhalV Gaalens Hotel
0
3s
& R
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
3
= v e � C
}rpp
Ny�pP
SrrE PLAN
E�l 01 `]?,
r v
r . •
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
WYNDHAM GARDEN HOTEL ADDITION RENOVATION A
.;PA�ES,
LOT 7
PALM BEACH COUNTY
FLORIDA
loommolou
1
09
�p
4j
IIIIIIIIO
.... ......... .
. ... .... . . ....
FLOOR PLAN
to
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
117
7
F
WYNDHAM GARDEN HOTEL ADDITION RENOVATION
AMENS
LOT 7
Ift
PALM
,
rrrFwunau
8 EACH COUNTY
FLORIDA
mz
oc
FLOOR PLAN
to
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
117
7
F
WYNDHAM GARDEN HOTEL ADDITION RENOVATION
AMENS
LOT 7
Ift
PALM
,
rrrFwunau
8 EACH COUNTY
FLORIDA
mz
IIIIIIII�,
'gj
g,
I_
j �Iro 1 I I
II ,� II I II
A i 1
n� �n Vt.:!• I, :1
n i rn (e1�7 Irt Ix
t °- I Jill
M
i. 4 - N
_ r
Z ry III
al 1 1 1 1 11 —
O E
n
IL j
LL L4
a � •II
III I
D i I
IIII IIII
IIII IIII i1
IIII IIII
c
a r
a D
� z
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
WINDSOR HOTEL ADDITION RENOVATION AMES
LOT 7 DESIGN
MFN.,HH4
PALM BEACH COUNTY
FLORIDA
•
IIIIIIII�
z�
je
D
A
d
m
. I
W
�BUII.DING ELEVATIONS
9
A
II Ili
Fits
;r
I
z
m r
F v•
fit
D
L
l T -
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
i
WYNDHAM GARDEN HOTEL ADDITION RENOVATION
AMA
LOT 7
I
DESIGN
MPM�npvµ
PALM BEACH COUNTY
FLORIDA
7
iiiinnu
BUILDING STREET ELEVA
VI -
1
z
z
3>
iin
7Z01 m
11
4
TIONS PRELIMINARY DESIGN
WYNDHAM GARDEN HOTEL ADDITION RENOVATION —A M�E S
DESIGN
LOT 7
PALM BEACH COUNTY
FLORIDA Jh I
011110
Imp
•
•
11151
L-1 I IF1
PRELIMINARY DESIGN
WYNDHAM GARDEN HOTEL ADDITION RENOVATION
LOT 7
PALM BEACH COUNTY
FLORIDA
Date Prepared: March 4, 2005
0, ORDINANCE 13, 2005
2
3
4 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE 53, 1988,
6 ORDINANCE 18, 1992, AND ORDINANCE 14, 1996 RELATING TO
7 THE ZONING FOR THE WATERFORD HOTEL PLANNED UNIT
8 DEVELOPMENT (PUD) TO TRANSFER THE SITE PLAN
9 APPROVAL AND RELATED CONDITIONS TO RESOLUTION 44,
10 2005; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
11
12
13 WHEREAS, on February 16, 1988, the City Council adopted Ordinance 53,
14 1988, thereby approving the Garden Suites Planned Unit Development (PUD); and
15
16 WHEREAS, on August 6, 1992, the City Council adopted Ordinance 18, 1992,
17 thereby approving an amendment to the Comfort Inn PUD to allow for the construction
18 of a swimming pool building; and
19
20 WHEREAS, on November 21, 1996, the City Council adopted Ordinance 14,
21 1996, thereby approving an amendment to the Comfort Inn PUD to allow for the
22 construction of a two -story, 7,507 square -foot ancillary building; and
4 WHEREAS, the City has received a request (PUD- 04 -10) from Mr. Marty Minor
25 of Urban Design Studio, on behalf of Savol of Florida Inc., for approval of an
26 amendment to the Waterford PUD to allow for the inclusion of a 1,710 square -foot
27 restaurant; and
28
29 WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application,
30 and has determined that it is more appropriate that the site plan approval and the
31 conditions related thereto be transferred to Resolution 44, 2005 of the City Council; and
32
33 WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the evidence and testimony
34 presented by the Petitioner and other interested parties and the recommendations of
35 the various City of Palm Beach Gardens review agencies and staff; and
36
37 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that adoption of this Ordinance is in
38 the best interest of the citizens and residents of the City of Palm Beach Gardens.
39
40
41 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
42 OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA that:
43
44 SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and ratified.
45
0 46
Date Prepared: March 4, 2005
Ordinance 13, 2005
eSECTION 2. Section 1 of Ordinance 53, 1988 is amended to read: The zoning
2 of the following described property known as the Waterford Hotel is hereby designated
3 as a A Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay with an underlying zoning of General
4 Commercial (CG -1): be and the same i6_ h8Feby Greated upen the lands known as
5 "GARDENS SLATES HOTEL"
15
16 LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
17
18 ALL THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 7 SECTION 4 TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH
19 RANGE 43 PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA LYING EAST OF THE EAST RIGHT -
20 OF -WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD NO. 5 (U.S. HIGHWAY NO 1), AS NOW LAID OUT
21 AND IN USE LESS THE NORTH 734.42 FEET THEREOF AND ALSO LESS THE
22 SOUTH 274.67 FEET THEREOF AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
4W4
25 COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
26 GOVERNMENT LOT 7 AND THE EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF SAID STATE
27 ROAD NO. 5 THENCE SOUTH 16 051'25" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY,A
28 DISTANCE OF 612.69 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
29 EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,850.09 FEET AND A PARTIAL CENTRAL ANGLE OF
30 04 015'09" THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE,A
31 DISTANCE OF 137.31 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE CONTINUE
32 SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, WITH A PARTIAL CENTRAL
33 ANGLE OF 09 019'36, A DISTANCE OF 301.16 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING
34 274.67 FEET NORTH OF (WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO) AND
35 PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 7• THENCE
36 SOUTH 86 052'35" EAST ALONG THE SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 283.51
37 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 7• THENCE
38 NORTH 01 051'50" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 7, A
39 DISTANCE OF 292.45 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 734.42 FEET SOUTH OF
40 (WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO) AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH
41 LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 7 THENCE NORTH 85 012'07" WEST ALONG
42 SAID PARALLEL LINE, A DISTANCE OF 251.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF
43 BEGINNING.
44
45
D
io
Mai
15
16 LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
17
18 ALL THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 7 SECTION 4 TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH
19 RANGE 43 PALM BEACH COUNTY FLORIDA LYING EAST OF THE EAST RIGHT -
20 OF -WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD NO. 5 (U.S. HIGHWAY NO 1), AS NOW LAID OUT
21 AND IN USE LESS THE NORTH 734.42 FEET THEREOF AND ALSO LESS THE
22 SOUTH 274.67 FEET THEREOF AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
4W4
25 COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
26 GOVERNMENT LOT 7 AND THE EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF SAID STATE
27 ROAD NO. 5 THENCE SOUTH 16 051'25" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY,A
28 DISTANCE OF 612.69 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
29 EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,850.09 FEET AND A PARTIAL CENTRAL ANGLE OF
30 04 015'09" THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE,A
31 DISTANCE OF 137.31 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE CONTINUE
32 SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, WITH A PARTIAL CENTRAL
33 ANGLE OF 09 019'36, A DISTANCE OF 301.16 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING
34 274.67 FEET NORTH OF (WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO) AND
35 PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 7• THENCE
36 SOUTH 86 052'35" EAST ALONG THE SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 283.51
37 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 7• THENCE
38 NORTH 01 051'50" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 7, A
39 DISTANCE OF 292.45 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 734.42 FEET SOUTH OF
40 (WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO) AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH
41 LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 7 THENCE NORTH 85 012'07" WEST ALONG
42 SAID PARALLEL LINE, A DISTANCE OF 251.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF
43 BEGINNING.
44
45
D
Date Prepared: March 4, 2005
Ordinance 13, 2005
•1 SECTION 3. Sections 2 through 8 inclusive of Ordinance 53, 1988; Sections 1
2 and 2 inclusive of Ordinance 18, 1992; and Sections 2 and 3 inclusive of Ordinance 14,
3 1996 are hereby transferred to Resolution 44, 2005. The remaining sections of
4 Ordinance 53, 1988, Ordinance 18, 1992, and Ordinance 14, 1996 shall be renumbered
5 accordingly. Any future amendments to the development plans and /or conditions of
6 approval shall be accomplished by Resolution of the City Council.
7
8 SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
9
10
11
12
13
14 (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank)
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
a 3
4
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
046
3
Date Prepared: March 4, 2005
Ordinance 13, 2005
0 PASSED this P _day of mp-L , 2005, upon first reading.
2
3
4 PASSED AND ADOPTED this S"' day of _ , 2005, upon second
5 and final reading.
6
7 CITY OF P BEAC :'GARDENS
8 I
9 BY: _ i r i 7 19
10 os or
12
13 Eric in, i
15 ayor
14
i ��
16 Dav' evy, C cilmember
18 Cf
19 RaM. Valeche, C uncilmemb
20
21
Jody B melt, uncilmember
3
24
25 ATTEST:
26
27
28 BY:
29 Patricia Sn-ider, CMC
30 City Clerk
31
32
33 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
34 LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
35
36
37 BY: i
38 hristine P. Tatum, City Attomey
39
40
41
42
43
44
FOR AGAINST ABSENT
0 5
6 G:\attorney _share \ORDINANCES \waterford hotel - ord 13 2005.doc
LI
�J
C7
is
Date Prepared: March 4, 2005
Revised Ap617, 2005
1 RESOLUTION 44, 2005
2
3
4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO
6 THE WATERFORD HOTEL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
7 (PUD), WHICH IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1 /10TH OF A MILE
8 SOUTH FROM PGA BOULEVARD ON THE EAST SIDE OF US
9 HIGHWAY ONE, TO ALLOW FOR THE INCLUSION OF A 1,710-
10 SQUARE -FOOT RESTAURANT INTO THE PUD, AS MORE
11 PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR
12 WAIVERS; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND
13 PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
14
15
16 WHEREAS, on February 16, 1988, the City Council adopted Ordinance 53,
17 1988, thereby approving the Garden Suites Planned Unit Development (PUD); and
18
19 WHEREAS, on August 6, 1992, the City Council adopted Ordinance 18, 1992,
20 thereby approving an amendment to the Comfort Inn PUD to allow for the construction
21 of a swimming pool building; and
22
23 WHEREAS, on November 21, 1996, the City Council adopted Ordinance 14,
24 1996, thereby approving an amendment to the Comfort Inn PUD to allow for the
25 construction of a two -story, 7,507- square -foot ancillary building; and
26
27 WHEREAS, on December 1, 2003, the Code Enforcement Special Master
28 determined that the existing restaurant at the Waterford Hotel was not an approved use,
29 and found the Waterford Hotel PUD in violation of City Code Sections 6646 and 78-49;
30 and
31
32 WHEREAS, the City has received a request (PUD- 04 -10) from Mr. Marty Minor
33 of Urban Design Studio, on behalf of Savol of Florida Inc., for approval of an
34 amendment to the Waterford PUD to allow for the inclusion of a 1,710- square -foot
35 restaurant; and
36
37 WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application,
38 has determined that it is sufficient and is consistent with the City's Land Development
39 Regulations, and has recommended approval; and
40
41 WHEREAS, by adoption of Ordinance 13, 2005, the City Council determined that
42 the site plan approvals and related conditions for the Waterford Hotel PUD contained in
43 Ordinance 53, 1988, Ordinance 18, 1992, and Ordinance 14, 1996 shall be transferred
44 to this Resolution; and
45
46
11
•
•
Date Prepared: March 4, 2005
Resolution 44, 2005
1 WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the evidence and testimony
2 presented by the Petitioner and other interested parties and the recommendations of
3 the various City of Palm Beach Gardens review agencies and staff; and
4
5 WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that adoption of this Resolution is in
6 the best interest of the citizens and residents of the City of Palm Beach Gardens.
7
8
9 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
10 OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA that:
11
12 SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and ratified.
13
14 SECTION 2. The amended development plans for the Waterford Hotel PUD are
15 hereby APPROVED on the following described real property, subject to the conditions of
16 approval provided herein:
17
18 LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
19
20 ALL THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 7, SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH,
21 RANGE 43, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING EAST OF THE EAST RIGHT -
22 OF -WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD NO. 5 (U.S. HIGHWAY NO, 1), AS NOW LAID OUT
23 AND IN USE, LESS THE NORTH 734.42 FEET THEREOF AND ALSO LESS THE
24 SOUTH 274.67 FEET THEREOF AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
25 FOLLOWS:
26
27 COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
28 GOVERNMENT LOT 7 AND THE EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF SAID STATE
29 ROAD NO. 5, THENCE, SOUTH 16 051'25" WEST, ALONG SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY, A
30 DISTANCE OF 612.69 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
31 EAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,850.09 FEET AND A PARTIAL CENTRAL ANGLE OF
32 04 015'09 ", THENCE, SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A
33 DISTANCE OF 137.31 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE, CONTINUE
34 SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, WITH A PARTIAL CENTRAL
35 ANGLE OF 09 019'36 ", A DISTANCE OF 301.16 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING
36 274.67 FEET NORTH OF (WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO) AND
37 PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 7; THENCE,
38 SOUTH 86 052'35" EAST, ALONG THE SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 283.51
39 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 7; THENCE
40 NORTH 01 051'50" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 7, A
41 DISTANCE OF 292.45 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 734.42 FEET SOUTH OF
42 (WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO) AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH
43 LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 7, THENCE NORTH 85 012'07" WEST ALONG
44 SAID PARALLEL LINE, A DISTANCE OF 251.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF
45 BEGINNING.
46
•
•
•
Date Prepared: March 4, 2005
Resolution 44, 2005
1 SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida hereby
2 approves the following four waivers:
3
4 1. Section 78 -344, Construction and Maintenance, to allow for 53, 9.5 -foot
5 wide parking spaces.
6
7 2. Section 78 -153, Nonresidential Zoning District Regulations, to allow for a
8 41 -foot front building setback.
9
10 3. Section 78 -153, Nonresidential Zoning District Regulations, to allow for a
11 building height of 50 feet.
12
13 4. Section 78 -153, Nonresidential Zoning District Regulations, to allow for an
14 eight -foot wide landscape buffer adjacent to residential.
15
16 SECTION 4. Said Planned Unit Development is approved subject to the
17 following amended conditions, which shall be the responsibility of the applicant, its
18 successors, or assigns:
19
20 ,'
21 fees as here4naftF designated,
22 payments,
23 ($9,000.00) DGkLARS shall -be
24 paid to the ReGFeation Build D ng and Development Fund ar.Geunl ef the
25 .
26 (b) The total sum of TWENT4 SEVEN THOWDSAND THREE HUNDRED
27 ($27.300.90) DOLLARS shall be paid to the Read lirnpi:eyement Fk"W
28 of the City as follows;
29
30 TWO-11-IR-AND SIX HUNDRED FIFTY ($13,650.00) DOLLARS Ghall
31 be paid;
32
OGGUpanoy the sum of
33 ,
34 DGLLARS shall be paid.
35 in the event that the Geurity of Palm BOaGh Ghall adopt aR OFdonanGe
36
37
38
39 fees imposed above by the Gity 6hall be applied ar. a rredit en aGr.Gu"
40
41
42
43 due to the City.
44
45
46
•
•
•
Date Prepared: March 4, 2005
ResoluUon 44, 2005
1
2
3 Gity gRgi-ROOF and all etheF building F8qUiF8FAeRt6 Of the Palm Bea
4
5 Alec.
6
7 3. The building en the Site RlaR d96ignated a6 a bank now larated on the
8 e6 Fnay be Gontinued ar. a baRk faGility until May 1, 1991. Within 6i)d
9 ays upon twminafion Of 6a.d lea6e, andloF 6aid lea6e option, the
10
iuthody ingFe66 on the site and pFov*de
11
12
13
14 u6es of the StFUGtUFO WhiGh 6hall be peFmitted-.
15
16 ,
17 .
18
19 the plan and drove in farility Femoved no later than three (3) yeaFs frGm
20 .
21
22 4. Signage, both temporwy and pemnanent, and any amendmentr. to the
23
24
25
26 Plan Review Committee rohall not bo required, noF 6hall a publiG heaFiAg OF
27
28 adoption of ruGh Re6olution.
29
30
31 the Gily a Unity of Title in requi6ito foFm to be appFaved by the City Aftorney
32 to the lands der.GFibed *n Exh4Nt "A,"
33
34 6. A'! pharses of development in the neWly GFeated Planned Unit Development
35 ,
36
37 apffOval of 6ub6equent QFdiRaRG,6.
38
39
40 hoW nGliva iss
41
42
43 prior to the i6suanr.o- Pf the first building pormit,
44
45
46
0
Date Prepared: March 4, 2005
Resolution 44, 2005
1
0.
Signage infoFfning mote06ts of additional handiGap being
2
paFking spaGe6
3
4
5
10.
The exi6ting vaGant one GteFy building on the be derneli6hed
6ite shall
and
6
.
7
8
1.
All mechanical louvers shall be painted to match the surrounding wall.
9
(Planning & Zoning)
10
11
2.
Musical entertainment, including, but not limited to, bands instruments, and
12
speakers shall be prohibited in all outside areas on site. (Planning &
13
Zoning, Code Enforcement)
14
15
3,
Outdoor seating for the restaurant shall be prohibited, no food and beverage
16
service shall be permitted in any outside area, and the existing outdoor
17
seating and food and beverage service operation shall cease immediateel
18
upon the adoption of this Resolution. (Planning & Zoning, Code
19
Enforcement)
20
21
4,
The applicant shall reduce the number of hotel rooms to 77 within nine
22
months from the effective date of this Resolution. (Planning& Zoning)
23
24
5.
Each hotel suite shall contain no more than one entrance /exit from the
25
common hotel corridor. (Planning & Zoning)
26
27
6.
Within 45 days from the effective date of this Resolution, the applicant shall
28
convert the existing meeting room area to a multipurpose space to be
29
utilized for hotel guests. This multi - purpose space shall be limited to lobby
30
space, storage, an exercise area, or to address the needs of guests staving
31
at the hotel. No outside meetings, such as banquets or receptions, shall be
32
permitted on site. (Planning & Zoning, Code Enforcement).
33
34
7.
The parking area below the ancillarVbuilding shall be 100% clear of all hotel
35
and restaurant storage, including the walled -in area located in the rear of
36
the underground parking area, immediately following the adoption of this
37
Resolution. The walled -in storage area shall be converted into two parking
38
spaces immediately following the adoption of this Resolution. (Planning &
39
Zoning, Code Enforcement)
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
•
•
•
Date Prepared: March 4, 2005
Resolution 44, 2005
1
8.
Within six months from the effective date of this Resolution, the applicant
2
shall construct two additional vertical feet to its existing concrete wall
3
located along its eastern boundary line. The existing concrete wall
4
separates the applicant's property from the Twelve Oaks Condominium
5
Association, Inc. The applicant shall apply for and obtain all necessary
6
permits. The two -foot addition shall be built and painted to match the
7
existing wall.
8
9
9.
The applicant shall use its best efforts to secure all necessary consent and
10
permits to construct a fence to secure the approximately fifteen feet of
11
unsecured property along the southeast corner of the applicant's property to
12
prevent pedestrian traffic between its orwertv and the Twelve Oaks
13
Condominium Association, Inc. Said concrete wall or fence shall be built to
14
the same vertical height of the existing concrete wall located along its
15
eastern boundary line. Said wall or fence may include a lockable late. If
16
said wall is constructed of concrete, it shall match the existing_ concrete wall
17
and painted to match the existing wall.
18
19
10.
The applicant shall prohibit swimming past dusk and use its best efforts to
20
prevent excessive noise between the hours of 9:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m.
21
22
SECTION 5. Said Planned Unit Development shall be constructed in compliance
23
with the
following plans, as amended herein, and on file with the City's Growth
24
Management Department:
25
26
1.
Master Site Plan, Landscaping Plan and Elevation Plan, consisting of nine
27
(9) sheets and prepared by gbs & h Inc., dated December 13, 1988, and as
28
revised as of February 9, 1989, marked Job No. 88 -1002. , and attaGhed
29
heFetO ar. &Xhibit "13". "GARDENS SUITES NOTEL" shall be develope
30
aGGer4daRGe with said plans,
"13 i
31
32
33
2.
Master Site Plan prepared by Cotleur Hearing and gbs &h architects, dated
34
March 17, 1992, consisting of one (1) sheet.
35
36
3.
North, West and East Elevations of the Pool Building, updated and prepared
37
by gbs &h architects, date stamped April 21. 1992, consisting of one (1)
38
page.
39
40
4.
Floor Plan of the Pool Building, updated and prepared by gbs &h architects,
41
date stamped April 21, 1992, consisting of one (1) sheet.
42
43
5.
November 13, 1996, Site Plan by Cotleur Hearing, Sheet 1 of 2.
44
45
6.
November 13, 1996, Landscape Plan by Cotleur Hearing, Sheet 2 of 2.
46
•
•
r�
Date Prepared: March 4, 2005
Resolution 44, 2005
1 7. November 11, 1996, Front Elevation by J.A.O. Architects and Planners,
2 Sheet A -1.
3
4 8. November 8, 1996, Right, Left and Rear Elevations by J.A.O. Architects and
5 Planners, Sheet A -2.
6
7 9. November 11, 1996, Parking Level Plan by J.A.O. Architects and Planners,
8 Sheet A -3.
9
10 10. November 11, 1996, First Floor Plan by J.A.O. Architects and Planners,
11 Sheet A-4.
12
13 11. August 8, 1996, Roof Plan by J.A.O. Architects and Planners, Sheet A -5.
14
15 12. August 8, 1996, Roof Plan by J.A.O. Architects and Planners, Sheet A -6.
16
17 13. November 11, 1996, Building Sections by J.A.O. Architects and Planners,
18 Sheet A -7.
19
20 14. Updated Lobby Renovation by J.A.O. Architects and Planners. 1 Sheet,
21 date stamped November 14, 1996.
22 —
23 15. Waterford Hotel Site Plan by Urban Design Studio. dated March 8.
24 2005, Sheet 1 of 5.
25
26 16. Waterford Hotel Landscape Plans by Urban Design Studio, dated October
27 15, 2004, Sheets 2 through 5.
28
29 SECTION 6. All future amendments to the Waterford Hotel PUD shall be
30 approved by Resolution.
31
32 SECTION 7. Said approval shall be consistent with all representations made by
33 the applicant or applicant's agents at any workshop or public hearing.
34
35 SECTION 8. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
36
37
38 (The remainder of this page left intentionally blank)
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
7
•
•
•
Date Prepared: March 4, 2005
Resolution 44, 2005
PASSED AND ADOPTED this e4. day of (Aw-j '2005.
2
3
4 CITY OF PALM B C G E , FLORIDA
5
6
7 BY:
8 —6ij s ph R. Russo, Mayor
9
10
ATTEST:
11
12
13
BY:
14
Patricia Snider, CMC
15
City Clerk
16
17
18
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
19
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
20
21
22
BY:
23
Christine P. Tatum, City Attorney
24
25
26
27
VOTE:
AYE NAY ABSENT
28
29
MAYOR R_USSO
.i
30
31
VICE MAYOR JABLIN
.�
32
33
COUNCILMEMBER LEVY
✓
34
35
COUNCILMEMBERVALECHE
✓
36
37
COUNCILM EMBER BARNETT
/
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
\\Pbgsfile\ Attorney \attomey_share\RESOLUTIONS \waterford hotel - reso 44 2005 - revisions 4- 7- 05.doc
8
0
p r =ter
� ra7 I I
7� o,"
°a 1 -o
a
cf
o�Gfio
aA
V
1 p i
•ItT -
s_€ �
s. fjp
Y
jE
F
_V
� ` i'
=tea__,
-.. � .... .. ;:. .. mom.' ti
` D; N
I-Zz,z0
uue" z
i
H >ZO F g' P�g 6E
=xoz F[ In
e OntCi.Z
c o'. u a=
zo`
AIOA�Qxxjl mg HA
oN
m_9" �m�'S " "• $ Ill
Watehrford Hotel
Palim Beach Gardens, Florida
Site Plan
F
n
R
s
o s i
DTgg
M--7
i
� T
D
M
A
s
Gf
m
°m
<3m
Z1
D
X333
Zmm w
_
Na'm
°� f -a
a 3$
'
2.g
m 3 , 3 m
m�
m $ m
a w
a N 9 0
y m m
aRN
0
°s
°n
8oya,�m°
-
D
_
vm�a�d
H�
uuQ
n�N
E � • � �.i,i .�
_ � a
V
a I
0
p r =ter
� ra7 I I
7� o,"
°a 1 -o
a
cf
o�Gfio
aA
V
1 p i
•ItT -
s_€ �
s. fjp
Y
jE
F
_V
� ` i'
=tea__,
-.. � .... .. ;:. .. mom.' ti
` D; N
I-Zz,z0
uue" z
i
H >ZO F g' P�g 6E
=xoz F[ In
e OntCi.Z
c o'. u a=
zo`
AIOA�Qxxjl mg HA
oN
m_9" �m�'S " "• $ Ill
Watehrford Hotel
Palim Beach Gardens, Florida
Site Plan
F
P
R
s
o s i
DTgg
7
IF-j
•
•
I1 R ®IPHEIREI® -0
O m m j D O y A r _
n X > a O n y > 2
x Q m -� p i c v
N > > N 3 T v N T
T M 2
r M
CE M
G)
V
M
T z
0 0 a r
2? T C c i m > y v m
0
x ; m n v a >
O , D Z D ; y F
m
D A
O
d
7�
1-300� OL -
0
101
o�
Go
)
1?
'1000
7n
b
M
0
V
r
D
M
D
r
O
C
s I
zr
<O
4
8 A
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
Landscape Improvement Plan
it
I
l
Mi
V� On
D
v�o0
ccz
0yZ
NTO
I
I
I-n
O
C
z
—I
D
z
D
M
D
W
r
C
0
I f7f 7 7z 7 3a =: -:
1 ;fiiEj�
'go
�
November 15, 1996
. ORDINANCE 14, 1996
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE
COMFORT INN PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 53, 1988, TO CONSTRUCT A
TWO -STORY 7,507 SQUARE -FOOT ANCILLARY BUILDING;
PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES IN
CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, previously
approved Ordinance 53, 1988, creating the Comfort Inn Planned Unit Development; and
WHEREAS, the City has received an application to amend the Comfort Inn Planned Unit
Development; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the amendment is consistent with the
City's Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA.
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, hereby
approves an amendment to the Comfort Inn Planned Unit Development (PUD), authorizing to
demolish an existing one -story 1,880 square -foot commercial building and the construction of a
• two -story 7,507 square -foot ancillary building and other site changes upon the subject property.
SECTION 2. The construction of the two -story building shall be in accordance with plans
on file with the City's Planning and Zoning Department as follows:
1. November 13, 1996 Site Plan by Cotleur Hearing. Sheet I of 2.
2. November 13, 1996 Landscape Plan by Cotleur Hearing. Sheet 2 of 2.
3. November 11, 1996 Front Elevation by J.A.O. Architects and Planners. Sheet A -1.
4. November 8, 1996 Right, Left and Rear Elevations by J.A.O. Architects and Planners.
Sheet A -2.
5. November 11, 1996 Parking Level Plan by J.A.O. Architects and Planners. Sheet A -3.
6. November 11, 1996 First Floor Plan by J.A.O. Architects and Planners. Sheet A-4.
7. August 8, 1996 Roof Plan by J.A.O. Architects and Planners. Sheet A -5.
8. August 8, 1996 Roof Plan by J.A.O. Architects and Planners. Sheet A -6.
9. November 11, 1996 Building Sections by J.A.O. Architects and Planners. Sheet A -7.
10. Undated Lobby Renovation by J.A.O. Architects and Planners. 1 Sheet.
•
•
•
•
ORDINANCE 14, 1996
Page 2
11. March 14, 1996 Existing Building Elevations by J.A.O. Architects and Planners.
Sheet A -8.
12. November 14, 1996 Conceptual Paving and Drainage Plan by Michael B. Schorah &
Associates, Inc. 1 Sheet.
SECTION 3. The amendment is approved subject to the following conditions:
1. A Boundary Plat shall be prepared, approved by City Council, and recorded prior
to the issuance of the first building permit.
2. All mechanical louvers shall be painted to match the surrounding wall.
3. Signage informing motorists of additional handicap parking spaces being located
in the parking garage shall be installed prior to the issuance of the Certificate of
Occupancy.
4. The existing vacant one -story building on the site shall be demolished and removed
within 90 days from approval hereof.
SECTION 4. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict are hereby repealed.
SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be effective upon passage.
PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS ,d DAY OF JULY 1996.
PLACED O EC D ADING THIS 0""bAY OF NOVEMBER 1996.
PASSED A THIS /SfDAY OF NOVEMBER 996.
144A SEPH R. RUSSO C�Ot1NCI� BIND NROE
VICE MAYOR LAUREN FURTADO
CqVVCILMEMBER ERIC JAIJUN
COUNCILMEMBER DAVID CLARK
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK AND SUFFICIENCY
BYE
CI`CY ATTORNEY
VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT
MAYOR RUSSO r
VICE MAYOR FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN MONROE _
COUNCILMAN JABLIN
COUNCILMAN CLARK
.r/ July 14 1992
August 6, 1992
ORDINANCE 18, 1992
• AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH
GARDENS, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 53,
1988, WHICH CREATED THE GARDENS SUITES HOTEL,
NOW KNOWN AS "COMFORT INN ", A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, AND AS SUBSEQUENTLY AMENDED BY
CREATING A SWIMMING POOL BUILDING IN
ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
CONTAINED HEREIN; AND, PROVIDING FOR THE
REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND,
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH
GARDENS, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Ordinance 53, 1988, which created GARDEN SUITES
HOTEL, now known as "COMFORT INN ", a Planned Unit Development and
as subsequently amended is hereby further amended in accordance
with the following plans and specifications:
1. Master Site Plan prepared by Cotleur Hearing and
gbs &h architects, dated March 17, 1992, consisting
of one (1) sheet.
2. North, West and East Elevations of the Pool
Building, undated and prepared by gbs &h
architects, consisting of one (1) page.
3. Floor Plan of the Pool Building, undated and
• prepared by gbs &h architects, consisting of one
(1) sheet.
Section 2. The meeting facility shall be limited to hotel
guests or in conjunction with hotel activities.
Section 3. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in
conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall be effective upon date of
passage.
PLACED ON F ST READING THIS _16TH _ DAY OF JULY 1992
LACED ON SEC D READING THIS Lr DAY OF ��fiitG'L� 1992.
P SSED AND APP OVER THIS (0�' DAY OF Li 0 1992.
MAYOR 7 1 �COUN/ LWOMA
i
VAC YOR COUNCIL N
ATTEST: COUNCILMAN
%i
l l •1 "V, 'F'L) n:
y QF11.1
• LIIfdA V. KOSIER, CITY CLERK AND =IJALaUFF C) ICIENCY
VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT
MAYOR MARTINO �� •�' ' ' '
VICE MAYOR RUSSO
COUNCILWOMAN MONROE
COUNCILMAN KISELEWSKI k-11
W"10 6-
ORDINANCE 53, 1988
• AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS,
FLORIDA, CREATING A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
ON CERTAIN LANDS LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY TO
BE KNOWN AS "GARDENS SUITES HOTEL" WITH USES
THEREOF AS DESIGNATED ON THE ATTACHED MASTER
SITE PLAN, SAID LANDS BEING DESCRIBED IN
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART
HEREOF; PROVIDING FOR PAYMENT BY THE DEVELOPER
THEREOF TO THE RECREATION BUILDING AND DEVELOP-
MENT FUND ACCOUNT AND ROAD IMPROVEMENT FUND OF
THE CITY AND METHOD OF PAYMENT; REQUIRING
THAT THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "A" SHALL
BE DEVELOPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MASTER SITE
PLAN, LANDSCAPING PLAN AND ELEVATION PLAN CON-
SISTING OF NINE (9) SHEETS AND PREPARED BY
GBS b H INC., DATED DECEMBER 13, 1988, AND
REVISED ON 2/9/89, MARKED JOB NO. 88 -1002,
AND ATTACHED HERETO AS EXHIBIT "B" ; PROVIDING
THAT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING
PERMIT THAT DEVELOPER POST EITHER A PERFORMANCE
BOND, LETTER OF CREDIT OR ESCROW AGREEMENT TO
GUARANTEE ALL ON -SITE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS,
DRAINAGE, AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING
FOR A METHOD OF APPROVAL OF SIGNAGE; PROVIDING
FOR UNITY OF TITLE; PROVIDING FOR METHOD OF
AMENDMENT; PROVIDING THAT ANY ORDINANCE IN
CONFLICT BE AND THE SAME IS HEREBY REPEALED;
AND, FURTHER, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE
HEREOF.
• BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
Section 1. A Planned Unit Development be and the same is
hereby created upon the lands known as "GARDENS SUITES HOTEL" located
within the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and more particularly
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. the
permitted usage shall be and the same is hereby designated as set
forth in the Master Site Plan attached hereto and marked Exhibit "B ".
In the event the sale of alcoholic beverages may arise in
the use of the premises, all requests shall be filed with the City
Clerk with such use to be determined by the City Council by a sub-
sequent Resolution. The intervention of the Planning and Zoning
Commission shall not be required nor shall the requirement that publi-
cation in a newspaper of general circulation be required for such
hearing. A variance to the distance requirements to the City
• rr
of Palm Beach Gardens Code between premises upon which alcoholic
• beverages are sold is hereby granted.
Section 2. Attached hereto and made a part hereof is a
Master Site Plan, Landscaping Plan and Elevation Plan, consisting of
nine (9) sheets and prepared by gbs & h Inc., dated December 13, 1988,
and as revised as of February 9, 1989, marked Job No. 88 -1002, and
attached hereto as Exhibit "B ". "GARDENS SUITES HOTEL" shall be deve-
loped in accordance with said plans, and the conditions contained in
that letter dated November 9, 1988, except for Item 6. is attached as
Exhibit 9-1".
Section 3. The Petitioner shall pay to the City of Palm
Beach Gardens, Florida, impact fees as hereinafter designated,
together with amounts of monies and time of payments:
(a) The total sum of EIGHT THOUSAND ($8,000.00)
DOLLARS shall be paid to the Recreation Building and
Development Fund account of the City prior to the
issuance of a Building Permit.
(b) The total sum of TWENTY -SEVEN THOUSAND THREE
• HUNDRED ($27,300.00) DOLLARS shall be paid to the Road
Improvement Fund of the City as follows:
1. Prior to the issuance of a Building Permit
the sum of THIRTEEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FIFTY
($13,650.00) DOLLARS shall be paid;
2. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of
Occupancy the sum of THIRTEEN THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED
FIFTY ($13,650.00) DOLLARS shall be paid.
In the event that the County of Palm Beach shall adopt an
Ordinance providing and requiring collection by the City of road
impact fees imposed by the County for improvements made in munici-
palities and the same shall be in effect prior to the issuance of a
Building Permit, then the road impact fees imposed above by the
City shall be applied as a credit on account of the County fees except
IWM
•
as the project shall impact City local streets, such impact to be
• determined In accordance with the requirements of the City's Ordinance
pertaining thereto. Debits and credits shall be applied by the City
in the determination of such fees due to the City.
Section 4. No Building Permit shall be issued until the
drainage and paving plans for development of the Planned Unit
Development shall be approved by the City Engineer and all other
building requirements of the Palm Beach Gardens Code and requirements
of other governmental agencies shall be met.
Section 5. The building on the Site Plan designated as a
bank now located on the premises may be continued as a bank facility
use until May 1, 1991. Within sixty (60) days upon termination of
said lease, and /or said lease option, the Petitioner shall close the
existing Southerly ingress on the site and provide landscaping in said
ingress area in accordance with the Palm Beach Gardens Code.
Further, upon termination of use as a bank, the drive -in
facility portion of the said structure shall be removed prior to the
following uses of the structure which shall be permitted.
. Professional and business offices as setforthin Chapter
159.088, Paragraphs A (2) and (3) and the use as a bank,
excluding drive -in facilities.
The elevations of the bank building shall be modified in
accordance with the plan and drive -in facility removed no later than
three (3) years from effective date, or as setforth above, depending
which event shall first occur.
Section 6. Slgnage, both temporary and permanent, and any
amendments to the landscaping plan approved hereby, in the event
necessary, shall be reviewed and approved by the City Council
by subsequent Resolution. The intervention or review of the
- 3 -
0
•
Planning and Zoning Commission or the Site Plan Review Committee
shall not be required, nor shall a public hearing or publication
in a newspaper of general circulation be required prior to the
adoption of such Resolution.
Section 7. Petitioner, prior to the issuance of the
first Building Permit, shall deliver to the City a Unity of Title
in requisite form to be approved by the City Attorney to the lands
described in Exhibit "A ".
Section 8. All phases of development in the newly
created Planned Unit Development shall be completed within three
(3) years from the effective date hereof, and the owner /developer
may obtain extensions for good cause shown by approval of subsequent
Ordinance.
Section 9. All references to Petitioner and /or Developer,
• together with all requirements provided herein, shall apply to
and be binding upon its successors and assigns. '
Section 10. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in
conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 11. This Ordinaance shall be effective upon date
of passage.
PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS 15TH DAY OF DECE ER, 1988.
PLACED ON SEC -- READING THIS, 4'x.1. /i DAY OF ,�/ ��i;; �,� 1989.
PASSED AN AD PTED'NTHIS 16 `i' DAY OF �/� �c :,ii . r.� � 1989. '
MAYOE --COUNCILWOMAN
VICE -MAYOR COUNCILMAN
ATTEST:
COUNCILMAN �
<_ .,.- -,'. f
LINDA IND, CITY CLERK,�CMC
•
APPROV§O AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL ICIENCY
C�
CITY ATTORNEY _.__
EXHIBIT "A"
ALL THAT PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 7, SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 43,
• PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING EAST OF THE EAST RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF STATE
ROAD NO. 5 (U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 1), AS NOW LAID OUT AND IN USE, LESS THE NORTH
734.42 FEET THEREOF AND ALSO LESS THE SOUTH 274.67 FEET THEREOF AND MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 7 AND
THE EASTERLY RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF SAID STATE ROAD NO. 5; THENCE, SOUTH
16'51'25" WEST, ALONG THE SAID RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 612.69 FEET TO
THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1850.09 FEET
AND A PARTIAL CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04'15'09 "; THENCE, SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC
OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 137.31 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE,
CONTINUE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, WITH A PARTIAL CENTRAL ANGLE OF
09'19'36 ", A DISTANCE OF 301.16 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 274.67 FEET
NORTH OF (WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO) AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF
SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 7; THENCE, SOUTH 86'5235" EAST, ALONG THE SAID PARALLEL
LINE A DISTANCE OF 283.51 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT
LOT 7; THEN, NORTH 01'51'50" EAST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT
7, A DISTANCE OF 292.45 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE LYING 734.42 FEET SOUTH OF
(WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO) AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
GOVERNMENT LOT 7; THENCE, NORTH 85'12'07" WEST ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE. A
DISTANCE OF 251.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 1.85 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS, AND RIGHTS OF WAY OF RECORD.
THE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION SHOWN HEREON IS AS FURNISHED, AND SAID LANDS HAVE NOT
BEEN ABSTRACTED FOR RIGHTS OF WAY AND /OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD. ANY
REPRODUCTIONS OF THIS SKETCH OF SURVEY ARE NOT VALID UNLESS SEALED WITH THE
EMBOSSED SEAL OF THE CERTIFYING SURVEYOR.
•
r
�J
Major_ Projects
Abacoa DRI Y
Town of Jupiter
Donald
Rd
A`
EeppoiMS ' a Frenchman's
Creek
oar
1 W
J, V
50 `.- C
43
roaoo.p cmm.ayux
ronnm n am
- rre�k tlgtll�vl ypfo�nl Parch �acel 7"o T
IVIIraSO'� 31.01 avo avit 0
31.0 31
' z F `} MC
� W '' PGA Blvd
� ioV BB
.� `,.. 47 Q X1
5 Blvd S
B U
R A IVd
cBurns Rd
PGA National BallenlSles
1� rA
N W
G
1 -ni
Noi
1 4s
Q
o
1\ �
,
f
W E ��
S
Letters under Project Number are the Initials for the Project Planner
P = Pending
R = Returning for additional review
'DRC = Development Review Committee
LPA = Local Planning Agency
® BOD = Build Out Date
ALM BEACH GARDENS See Attachment for Approved projects within the city
A Signature City 4,300 0 4,300 8,600 12,900 17,200 Feet
1
m
im
lako Park
Numbering System does not indicate priority of Review Processing
Important: The schedule listed below is Tentative. Please Contact Planning and Zoning to Confirm Schedule:
561 - 799 - 4243
Concurrency
Concurrency
DRC
Concurrency
NIIIIII
Major Projects
Submittal Date
Certification
DRC'
Certification
Planning &Zoning
City Council
Build out Date
( i)
(Dec 31)
31
mark (P•
December 25, 2000
January 3, 2003
December R 2004
January 24, 2006
Ill
6 131.07)
Mardi 20, 2002
R e, oning from P DA to
° c '° -^ " Con-
Landu.rerhmgrfrwn RHto
MXD4'UD
tact:Jin Gielda Land Design
Mxn
Workshop
South; 561- 395 -6868
Residential High &Mixed Use
Project, 176 multi-famly condo
tax
units, 39,167 sq If office, 24,512
sq It retail,
14,655 sq It restaurant,
21,600 sq It furniture store,
141,706 sgIL 4-story parking
garage w 1409 spac es
38
(Pare::
March 28, 2003
April 18, 2005
May 13, 2004
September 23, 2003
Novem her 6,2007
TM
AMXD)
May 21, 2003
April 13, 2006
Al hargeMXDloRif
MXD toRH.PH
ixr G.: -. - ;:mrted Part
t ° "d art rhange�nm MXU U�
Puhhe Hearing
VReadmg
nership
RH
ReetoCC
December 4,2003
Contact: Urban Design Studio;
June 18, 2103
.tune 28, 2005
MXD to RH, PH
366 -1100
Workshop
2nd Readoig
10,000 sq If Office, 12,000 sq It
Novem her 8, 200.5
Drugstore, 4,000 set itBank,
Pubh,llearing
Deeem her IK2007
15,000 sq fl Restaurant,
Re, k) CC
MXD to RH. PH
2087
11,600 sq It Retail, 252 Taw n
January 24, 2006
2nd Readng
house Units
Rezoning to M XD
June 15, 2006
Workshy
RezontngtoMXD
April 25, 2006
PH
RezoningtoMXD
July 20, 2006
Rec to CC
Rezoningto MXU
PH
43
nehman's Crossing
December R 2004
July 25, 2006
BW
:,od Rd & ALT A1A
September 22, 2005
RezoningtoMXDt
ne Xat;C"I)
PUD
Owner: H. ^.ompany
Workshop
Contact: Jennifer Morton,
Land Design South, (561) 478-
2008
2008
8501
71,650sgIt, Neighborhood
Commercial, 72 dw elhng units,
13,050 sq it Employment Center
Dc.
July 25, 2006
November 2, 2006
BW
Ow
Workshop
I ea R-J.g
Contact: LIDS 366 -1100
I'll
Redesignate Commercial to
De rmhrr 7, 2006
Mixed Use PUD 89,000 sq It
.h:d Rmdm7;
self storage building, two 7,500
sg4t restaurants, and a 3,100 sq
PLl
f t bank
48
December a 2005
TM
Cortact: Kin betty Glas-
Castro, (561) 8384542
180 Tow, nhouse units
49
Nc
May 11, 2006
SM
Ownei �mutn vdart
Contact: Cotbur& Hering,
747 -6336
Redesignate Commercial to
Residential High 158 multi-
family dwelhng units
TM
Contact: Cotleur & Hearing,
747 -6336
Redesignate Residential Law to
Residential Medium 83 multi-
farrty dwelling units
51
Pa ardens
August 23, 2006
JH
W r: sfi.
Ow net Palm Beach Acquisition
Lk C'
Contact: Jan Poison, Cotleur &
Hearing, 747 -6336
Redesignate 495 978 acres
From Residential- R R1 0, Com-
mercial, & industrial
To Industrial (121 acres),Com-
mercial (40 acres) & Conserva-
tion (335 acres
Source Growth Management Department
Palm Beach Gardens, FL Printed 11/292006
$8 00 per copy
60OZ' LC,•gw•o-(3
900Z44 uo[plosea
sawoq wool 4Z 14W unulw.Wn 9 L
PON lc I- qw -o.O
GOOZ'991 uoryllos -a
-
ba l -pm-v4. oa
p u o0o tro
98
SOOT 4E 010
.. ffl U b.00O'ul
)o U'bs 000'009 Pue eoJp p'Y 'bs 000'04Z
.
So0z Z9t.- Mlos-a
S6oz'ZS l uOWVO"a
'Z[
a4un
APwe1RF+W 09ZIna,ewwo0ll be ppp'pl
M/
SOOZ ealeug,O
BOOTIE I- glu•o•O
SOOZ'9L l- Wrl-.a
eaUo wuolssa)wdabs 000 09
Z
SOOZ'LE ea 4-0
9ooZ n u-q wc-N
9OOZ'lc,-gwea-O
SOOZ'c9 uomm—
SOOZ'6l- �,.upo
was OZ'uoid
.u.xe =IS 95E'LSl
Soot .91 ....po
9002 `I I uow Na
exdt ..W. I.uoaasep,d U ba ZCfi'ZZ
X
�O
SOOL-GL I uoTPNa
-cll - -110 R ?P•W U ba 9516 -11--4d
.,
M
•s010 U b. Zez'9 t 'A-w t :Z 6u!Ptne
POOZ'9Luognl•••a
•LOUb- OSO'ol'A,gcL L&WIn9
q
'.a6u1Pl1ne 110 RuOI —J-d
400Z 'Z6 uoTlosea
• J1O RUOlss.p,d U bs
'Pe-
LOOZ IE,egw (]
400Z'EL ea,eug,O
006-01 mli U b. oS661 'Pelsa SZO n
- -
n
'4oaVOY°u.O Pu.p.8 J. u b• fES 49
'qM- 1111-PS. SZZ :l !.,d ° pexltl
LOOZ'lC- gw-o-O
4WZ'961 WWW. -a
sw,n Alas) -mss OZZ
rooz'fic •1•wwo
syl.l N!w•r1U'w 6/z :w•hId earl P•nw
1
LODZ'IC-q---O
tOOZ,9l.Z -.Trio 8
to U be pulslpl. ba
00005 We'.alpp'4 O0000l
1911.1111d ,•ws7 lb-Cl YOd
$
f00Z• »rusu!WO
'Rgw p'U ba 000'051 :P.[wd -w1 P..W
LOOZIC,•gw -o•O
4ppZ'ty• ulpo
esllela,eluj Ubs OOS'Z'es1 RoIPeW
400z,Llzu -WIP-• 1
Uba OSS't I'RwI- wu- 3Ub- SLO'SI' -ads
.1.xR- 11 Nis a p "r)
N
-op 0 U ba OOZ Lf :1,- wd0l-..P -all P-nW
LOOZ'iC -q --0
0O0Z'6Z l uo0nPNa
w'=IS OOD66E
'e JP j Pu 5 000'69 Jow-O • n P•-v4
iv�vawwo0 Id A-61
900Z'IC ,•qw...0
4OOZ'Sf l uopryos-a
6ugpne tn.a 11 bs 6£8 ifl loelad N•lea
'Ind 43 ..,,b .>fryI/,:.1
d
13x9 LO "K 1 -11 -d
LODZ'LC,-gw -x0
EOOZ n l uolnoaea
IRlea U b. 00091 PU.•oIUO Y b. 000'SOl
.nobs I- .11ns.aR
O
sIV•8 0 -17. -J N 000'Ol
wogs -v.luenw�
LODZ'M l -q--O
EOOZ'991 uo!"
'
Pu•.!M. -5 N.)w bs 5Z6'E
BOf R°°61 -1 •b• 699ZY
to 01 Id M•M iosll
N
COOZtz a F-P
woes
1 ,.ow6 W-J wslbs SPED 'LS :w-!Old tq-a
6o0Z'9l k--r
EOOZ'961 uopgo•-a
w. lol.AeO opuoo Pun 991
(t 1'1 Z I -d) 4 ..Purl -a
w
s9.ln Atus WM 991.
LOOZ lc).gw.P-O
EOOZ'L -m P10
poolPgyBIM.I i.1sN w000
O Rq waDs 5LE'6l
u°PnO .W le spw6 s�
�
e7.U0 ss-ulsna l••l w.nb. SLE'6l
root - L£,egw -o-O
OOOZ'4.z,.ug,0
Atw•) MK- 06
.I."ll u.s
H
IOU Ic )-glue Q
Z00Z'9/ _--q -0
Ioolp'y -wood I••1 w-nba Eovoc
P-4-s".9
r
BOOT lc ,"- -o-O
ZOOZ ZE •1Ng1O
s)-n Al.-=I MBulg EEE
13 W-0 u -d PIO
t
spm 6uwl P.ISlss. 91l
LOOT le ,egweoeO
Zo9Z'E- ---P1O
swn APw•l M6ua OOZ
a>t"gy N1.••Iq.9
H
q- 4-pr- O91
W.9 R•1 wslbs 09L'Z
IN .anld
900Z'Ifngw 0
tGUZ'le --WPO
IuuIMI.ea IN) wenb. OOO'S
13nd-11 -Au-g
E)
-olUO I -) --ba Op0'SZ
axw n'il I---d
eye wugss-)aId )N) -d- 000 OZ
6002 1E mgLu -O
Coot 16 uww.a
nu-up 1N1 waft 069'Lg
w- w.wA-M 1--1 w.nbs 542 On
w P,M-a 1-IUwp.roO
j
R-- p4-%0- IN) wslbc 00O9Z
60OZ lE,.gw0
COOZ l9uomlo u
s°enarw.ol SZZ
".0 mog,.N
3
4002 lC I- gwea-O
s)u..gsdy 966
d
IOOZ OSuogllos•a
.M-A u.y - -
LOOZ IE,•gw -o-O
-__-
100Z 4- --!FuO
- wn5 -o--O OES
ax,as °a a, u.wvway
9002 lC1 -qu- c
9OOZ'9fuowgoa-N
900Z' ►1-a,.ulplp
s°v1oIF-nol
A-IS C pu. Z S/Z:1 uldolel•O ROUeq"a
'i0�lt l•yd)uoldw.Ipnoy
8
m-n "-a0 A1PI•lgnW 95l
LOOT Ie,egw -oeO
ZOOZ'CS•-.u* -0
..00 sa-.-S l -q wvnba W06
.b -IRA S V PP wa rO VIM Y 111111
d
1.lo,auau.0 1-6) wwlb. 961961
q.a loo Ppng
uoiwg•s•1Y•ou•uN,O
(%M pu. N°) ° rd s) .6.sll N,y
q -go,d ,ohN
.wpq u s. q- o d p.cea
(uo6ppV d. V4 •u•Pmg 42-49 u6-dlo N13 ata uPAW %o fo,d -f-w
i.
Please Print
Name: /I
Address:
City:
Subject:
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
Request to Address City Council
J
Our
Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public"
portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings ". This Request to Address the City
Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting.
The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
Request to Address City Council
Please Print
Name: ���l���G�� 7-4
Address:
city:
Subject:
Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public"
portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings ". This Request to Address the City
Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting.
The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.