Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Council Agenda 051800• City of Palm Beach Gardens Council Agenda May 18, 2000 • Council Chambers 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Mayor Russo Vice Mayor Jablin Council Member Clark Council Member Furtado ID Council Member Sabatello REVISED • All those wishing to address the City Council need to complete the necessary form (supply located in back of Council Chambers) and submit same to the City Clerk prior to the meeting being called to order. CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MAY 18, 2000 7:00 P.M. I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. ROLL CALL III. ANNOUNCEMENTS: IV. PRESENTATIONS: a. Introduction of 5 New Police Officers b. Landscaping for Riverside Drive V. CITY MANAGER REPORT: a. Strategic Plan b. Construction Update C. Growth Management Report VI. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC: (For Items Not on the Agenda) (Please submit request card to Clerk prior to this Item) VII. CONSENT AGENDA: a. Consideration of approving Minutes from the April 17, 2000 Regular City Council Meeting. b. Consideration of approving Minutes from the April 27, 2000 Special Workshop City Council Meeting. C. Award of Bid for 16 computers or the Emergency Operating Center to Dell Computers, Inc per piggyback GSA contract. d. Award of Bid for EM/2000 Software to Specialized Disaster Systems International, Inc. per piggyback State and County Bid. e. Award of Bid for Plat 4 -Phase I: North and South Banyan Street Drainage Retrofit to D.S. Eakins Construction Corporation per piggyback on Palm Beach County contract. • f. Resolution 37, 2000 — Consideration of authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Memorandum of Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation for the beautification and maintenance of the intersection of PGA Boulevard and State Road 811. g. Resolution 43, 2000 — Consideration of approving the Professional Centre at the Gardens a.k.a. Gertz Office Building Plat. h. Resolution 44, 2000 — Designating May 21st — 27th, 2000 as Fight Fraud Week. VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. Ordinance 8, 2000 — Consideration of providing for amendment of Ordinance 21, 1998, the Development Order for the Golf Digest Planned Community District, by adopting an Amendment Development Order; providing for amendment of the Master Development Plan to reconfigure golf and residential development parcels; providing for modified conditions of approval; providing for severability; providing for the repeal of all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith; and providing for an effective date. b. Ordinance 14, 2000 — Consideration of approving the application of Palm Beach Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership for an amendment of a previously approved Planned Unit Development located at the southwest corner of PGA Boulevard and Interstate Highway 95 by approving an increase in square footage in the Phase 2 Office Building from 82,265 to 82,389 and a reduction in height from ten stories to five stories, and allowing the permitted Phase 2 Parking Structure to have an optional third floor; providing for conditions of approval; providing for waivers. IX. RESOLUTIONS: a. Resolution 33, 2000 — Consideration of approving a site plan of development for entry features within the Golf Digest PCD along PGA Boulevard, the subject property is located along the north side of PGA Boulevard, west of the Florida Turnpike, east of the Loxahatchee slough, and south of Hood Road; providing for conditions of approval. b. Resolution 38, 2000 — Consideration of providing for the approval of a wall sign at BellSouth Switching Station, located approximately 0.2 miles from the southeast corner of Alternate AIA and RCA Boulevard, on the south side of RCA Boulevard as more particularly described herein. C. Resolution 41, 2000 — Consideration of authorizing the acquisition of right -of -way along Burns Road and filing of Eminent Domain proceedings. X. ORDINANCES: (For Consideration of First Reading) XI. ITEMS FOR COUNCIL ACTION: a. Burns Road Widening — Consideration of a motion to move forward with Burns Road Improvements. b. PGA Flyover — Consideration of a motion to move forward with PGA Flyover Improvements. XII. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: a. Bulletin Board Placement at City Hall XIII. ITEMS & REPORTS BY MAYOR AND COUNCIL: XIV. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT XV. ADJOURNMENT. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Florida Statute 86.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodations to participate in this proceeding should contact the Human Resources Department, no later than 5 days prior to the proceeding at telephone number (561) 799 -4200 for assistance; if hearing impaired, telephone the Florida Relay Service Numbers (800) 955 -8771 (TDD) or (800) 955 -8700 (VOICE), for assistance. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Council, with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, they will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose, they may need to ensure that a verbatim record . of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. • a City of Palm Beach Gardens Council Agenda May 18, 2000 Council Chambers 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Mayor Russo Vice Mayor Jablin Council Member Clark Council Member Furtado Council Member Sabatello E7 C City of Palm Beach Gardens Council Agenda May 18, 2000 Council Chambers 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Mayor Russo Vice Mayor Jablin Council Member Clark Council Member Furtado Council Member Sabatello REVISED 0 All those wishing to address the City Council need to complete the necessary form (supply located in back of Council Chambers) and submit same to the City Clerk prior to the meeting being called to order. CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MAY 18, 2000 7:00 P.M. I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. ROLL CALL III. ANNOUNCEMENTS: IV. PRESENTATIONS: a. Introduction of 5 New Police Officers b. Landscaping for Riverside Drive -�06 t��lc►._� /k( V. CITY MANAGER REPORT: 9LO.,* a. Strategic Plan C• v4 M k raaacom b. Construction Update C. Growth Management Report VI. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC: (For Items Not on the Agenda) (Please submit request card to Clerk prior to this Item) VII. CONSENT AGENDA: a. Consideration of approving Minutes from the April 17, 2000 Regular City Council Meeting. b. Consideration of approving Minutes from the April 27, 2000 Special Workshop City Council Meeting. C. Award of Bid for 16 computers or the Emergency Operating Center to Dell Computers, Inc per piggyback GSA contract. d. Award of Bid for EM12000 Software to Specialized Disaster Systems International, Inc. per piggyback State and County Bid. e. Award of Bid for Plat 4 -Phase 1: North and South Banyan Street Drainage Retrofit to D.S. Eakins Construction Corporation per piggyback on Palm Beach County contract. • f. Resolution 37, 2000 — Consideration of authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Memorandum of Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation for the beautification and maintenance of the intersection of PGA Boulevard and State Road 811. g. Resolution 43, 2000 — Consideration of approving the Professional Centre at the Gardens a.k.a. Gertz Office Building Plat. h. Resolution 44, 2000 — Designating May 21st — 27th, 2000 as Fight Fraud Week..,. VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. Ordinance 8, 2000 — Consideration of providing for amendment of Ordinance 21, 1998, the Development Order for the Golf Digest Planned Community District, by adopting an Amendment Development Order; providing for amendment of the Master Development Plan to reconfigure golf and residential development parcels; providing for modified conditions of approval; providing for severability; providing for the repeal of all ordinances or parts o ordinances in con ict herewith; and providing for an effective date. b. Ordinance 14, 2000 — Consideration oi"approving the application of Palm Beach Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership for an amendment of a previously approved Planned Unit Development located at the southwest corner of PGA Boulevard and Interstate Highway 95 by approving an increase in square footage in the Phase 2 Office Building from 82,265 to 82,389 and a reduction in height from ten stories to five stories, and allowing the permitted Phase 2 Parking Structure to have an optional third floor; providing for conditions of approval; providing for waivers. IX. RESOLUTIONS: a. Resolution 33, 2000 — Consideration of approving a site plan of development for entry features within the Golf Digest PCD along PGA Boulevard, the subject property is located along the north side of PGA Boulevard, west of the Florida Turnpike, east of the Loxahatchee slough, and south of Hood Road; providing for conditions of approval. b. Resolution 38, 2000 — Consideration of providing for the approval of a wall sign at BellSouth Switching Station, located approximately 0.2 miles from the southeast corner of Alternate AIA and RCA Boulevard, on the south side of RCA Boulevard as more particularly described herein. C. Resolution 41, 2000 — Consideration of authorizing the acquisition of right -of -way along Burns Road and filing of Eminent Domain proceedings. X. ORDINANCES: (For Consideration of First Reading) 0 XI. ITEMS FOR COUNCIL ACTION: a. Burns Road Widening — Consideration of a motion to move forward with Burns Road Improvements. b. PGA Flyover — Consideration of a motion to move forward with PGA Flyover Improvements. XII. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: a. Bulletin Board Placement at City Hall XIII. ITEMS & REPORTS BY MAYOR AND COUNCIL: XIV. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT XV. ADJOURNMENT. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Florida Statute 86.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodations to participate in this proceeding should contact the Human Resources Department, no later than 5 days prior to the proceeding at telephone number (561) 799 -4200 for assistance; if hearing impaired, telephone the Florida Relay Service Numbers (800) 955 -8771 (TDD) or (800) 955 -8700 (VOICE), for assistance. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Council, with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, they will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose, they may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. • • i 1 m R EPP- CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council DATE May 12, 2000 FROM: Nabar Enrique Martinez, City Managervlw� SUBJECT: Information Items for Regular City Council Meeting of May 18, 2000 City Council Agenda: VII. CONSENT AGENDA: a. Consideration of approving Minutes from the April 17, 2000 Regular City Council Meeting. b. Consideration of approving Minutes from the April 27, 2000 Special Workshop City Council Meeting. C. Award of Bid for 16 computers or the Emergency Operating Center to Dell Computers, Inc per piggyback GSA contract. Staff recommends Award of Bid for purchase of 16 Dell optiPlex GX -100 low profile computers to Dell Computers, Inc. in the amount of $14,688.00 utilizing grant funding. d. Award of Bid for EM/2000 Software to Specialized Disaster Systems International, Inc. per piggyback State and County Bid. Staff recommends Award of Bid for purchase of EM12000 software to Specialized Disaster International, Inc in the amount of $27,680.00 utilizing grant funding. e. Award of Bid for Plat 4 -Phase I: North and South Banyan Street Drainage Retrofit to D.S. Eakins Construction Corporation per piggyback on Palm Beach County contract. Staff recommends Award of contract to D.S. Eakins Construction Corporation for drainage improvements on Banyan Street utilizing $94,150.00 utilizing gas tax funding. f. Resolution 37, 2000 — Consideration of authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Memorandum of Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation for the beautification and maintenance of the intersection of PGA Boulevard and State Road 811. Staff recommends execution of the Memorandum of Agreement with FDOT to beautify and improve the highway right -of -way at PGA Blvd. and SR 811. g. Resolution 43, 2000 — Consideration of approving the Professional Centre at the Gardens a.k.a. Gertz Office Building Plat. Staff recommends approval since there are no engineering concerns. RECOMMENDATION: Consider a motion to approve the Consent Agenda. . VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. Ordinance 8, 2000 — Consideration of providing for amendment of ordinance 21, 1998, the Development Order for the Gold Digest Planned Community District, by adopting an Amendment Development Order; providing for amendment of the Master Development Plan to reconfigure golf and residential development parcels; providing for modified conditions of approval; providing for severability; providing for the repeal of all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith; and providing for an effective date. Staff recommends approval of Golf Digest PCD amendments which include modifications to the master plan, amendments to the parkway cross - sections, revisions to conditions of approval and related changes to other plans and illustrations with condition modifications. The proposed changes do not affect the overall dwelling unit count or mix. b. Ordinance 14, 2000 — Consideration of approving the application of Palm Beach Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership for an amendment of a previously approved Planned Unit Development located at the southwest corner of PGA Boulevard and Interstate Highway 95 by approving an increase in square footage in the Phase 2 Office Building from 82,265 to 82,389 and a reduction in height from ten stories to five stories, and allowing the permitted Phase 2 Parking Structure to have an optional third floor; providing for 10 conditions of approval; providing for waivers. Staff recommends approval of the request from Palm Beach Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership to amend the master plan for the Admiralty PUD with conditions. IX. RESOLUTIONS: a. Resolution 33, 2000 — Consideration of approving a site plan of development for entry features within the Golf Digest PCD along PGA Boulevard, the subject property is located along the north side of PGA Boulevard, west of the Florida Turnpike, east of the Loxahatchee slough, and south of Hood Road; providing for conditions of approval. Staff recommends approval of the Golf Digest Entries Petition with conditions. b. Resolution 38, 2000 — Consideration of providing for the approval of a wall sign at BellSouth Switching Station, located approximately 0.2 miles from the southeast corner of Alternate AIA and RCA Boulevard, on the south side of RCA Boulevard as more particularly described herein. Staff recommends approval of the petition by BellSouth for a wall sign based on the fact that the sign meets all Code requirements and the color of the sign materials matches the material used with the windows. 1 C. Resolution 41, 2000 — Consideration of authorizing the acquisition of right -of -way along Burns Road and filing of Eminent Domain proceedings. Staff recommends approval of acquiring the right -of -way necessary for the widening of Burns Road before the traffic problems begin on PGA Boulevard. XI. ITEMS FOR COUNCIL ACTION: a. Burns Road Widening — Consideration of a motion to move forward with Burns Road Improvements. Staff recommends approval of acquiring the right -of -way necessary for the widening of Burns Road before the traffic problems begin on PGA Boulevard. Additionally, staff seeks approval to move forward with implementing a City road impact fee. b. PGA Flyover — Consideration of a motion to move forward with PGA Flyover Improvements. Staff recommends proceeding with the hiring of special legal counsel and consultants to be paid by the special assessment area and move forward with the PGA Flyover enhancements. XII. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: a. Bulletin Board Placement at City Hall • 0 FM • IV. PRESENTATIONS Introduction of 5 New Police Officers rte`, CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM W� r ��.1JEJ•� TO: Nabar Martinez, City Manager Beth Ingold -Love, Assistant to City Manager DATE: May 12, 2000 FROM: Bob Patty, Director/Public Works -? SUBJECT: Landscape Beautification Projects Each year Public Works schedules infrastructure improvements in City right of ways in conjunction with available funding. At the same time, beautification projects are identified; these projects enhance and beautify green ways, road right of ways or canal right of ways. In an attempt to reduce the disruption or impact on surrounding residents in these areas, the department schedules beautification projects in conjunction with this infrastructure work. This process lends merit to the fact the area is under repair once, and the City does not have to come back at a later date to complete additional work. The Riverside Drive landscape beautification project has been identified as one of those areas which would enable the City to utilize road right of way and canal right of way as a linear park. Funding has been budgeted to improve sidewalk linkage and canal improvements in this area. The Public Works Department has asked the Parks and Recreation Department, if additional funding was available to beautify this area. The total cost to complete this landscape project is $150,000. Public Works has identified $100,000 of the needed funding, and Parks and Recreation has graciously offered the additional $50,000 to complete this project. On April 5h at the Burns Road Community Center the City met with residents from this area to discuss this landscape project and received positive feedback. Frank Meroney, Landscape Architect, was hired by the City to design and present this project to the residents. The City engineers and the Public Works Department have asked Frank Meroney to also present this project to Council for further discussion. If Council so chooses, Public Works will coordinate with the landscape architect to produce an R.F.P. to complete this project with available funding in this year's budget. As always I will make myself available to discuss this at the next available Council meeting. Cc: Dan Clark Jon Iles Bob Glancy File 4 J T,RFH MEMORANDUM Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari & Hellstrom, Inc. TO: Dr. Beth Ingold -Love, Assistant to City Manager FROM: Daniel P. Clark, P.E., Assistant City Engineer -`DP'- DATE: May 10, 2000 SUBJECT: Landscaping Plan Presentation for Linear Park along Riverside Drive I I have coordinated with Frank Meroney of Environmental Design Group and he is preparing a short presentation for Council on the landscaping plans for the park along Riverside Drive on May 18`'. The presentation to Council will be similar to the one he made during the public meeting held on April 5, 2000. Recommendations received from Sergeant J. Spencer, the SEPTED Coordinator, from the residents and from staff have been incorporated. Frank will probably need somewhere between 10 and 15 minutes for his presentation and answering any questions. I am assuming that you or Bob will make the introduction of Frank and discuss the significance of City beautification, enhancing neighborhoods and improving quality of life associated with this project. DPC /dw o cc: Sean Donahue Frank Meroney 3 Carol Gold `1 "Partners for Results —Value by Design" 2090 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., Suite 600, West Palm Beach, FL 33409 (561) 684 -3375 / FAX 689 -8531 \ \pc \Projects \PBGTEMP \Memo to Ingold Re landscaping plan pres.doc e TO: FROM: SUBJECT: CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM Mayor and Council ern DATE: May 12, 2000 Nabar Enrique Martinez, City Managery[A Draft Strategic Plan Included in this Council packet is a draft copy of a proposed three -year Strategic Plan for the City of Palm Beach Gardens. The process to develop the Strategic Plan began in January 2000 with a staff weekend planning session. Following the planning sessions, a smaller steam team developed the plan further, ensuring the plans "fit" within the City's Vision Document. Also incorporated into the plan were additional goals and strategies to ensure the accomplishment of Council stated objectives. The document is intentionally in draft form to provide an opportunity for your input, comments, deletions or additions. The final draft will be prepared and available in two weeks. • NEM:bil • o a"t , - 1 � ./ , 4 14 R w PSv VO4 �. — �X o, • c nn IK ea0 Cr . - `� j' �% 4-0-(w �s A vUV- 0 6k: • L 0 V. CITY MANAGER REPORT b. Construction Update Verbal Report OL- ��� oL o�►. �s c w� 1 4 �L, It 4117 C -CC Add jz, 0 • • • CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM xi (2- TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: May 11, 2000 APPROVED: Nabar Martinez, City Manager FROM: Roxanne Manning, Growth Management Director _ SUBJECT: Growth Management Update Attached please find a brief summary of the following items: a) The Forbearance Agreement, b) The School Concurrency Study. Staff will also provide verbal updates on these items at the May 18th City Council Meeting. -T- • GROWTH MANAGEMENT FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT WORK PROGRAM 0 • Item Status Completion Date Details 1) Hire Temporary staff to meet anticipated workload. a) Part Time/In a) Completed a) February 2000 a) VrVact?lanner eve House view b) Consultant for b) RFP completed b) In process ��sifigljWtant to large projects ev ment review 2) Fill vacant staff Completed: positions J. Norquest March, 1999 Two permanent S. Cramer July, 1999 vacancies both filled. 3) Phase 1 Code Completed. July 1999 Completed adoption Revision of "Glitch list' amendments. 4) Forbearance 120 day suspension For WCI and Period of submittals. Aug 13, 1999 secondary purchasers 5) Concurrency 60 day suspension of Jun 15, 1999 For all projects which Moratorium concurrency review. utilize capacity. 6) Select Consultant Selected Duncan and May 6, 1999. See next item. for Code Associates. Revision 7) Complete Final draft completed Est: final adoption Pending final Code Rewrite. and in review May 2000. approval by City process. Council. 8) Transportation Initial study Initiated: Nov 1999. Joint project with Task Force Study completed, follow up Study presented to P.B.County to work in progress. City Council May 4`h evaluate impacts of 2000 development on transportation. l.J V • • C GROWTH MANAGEMENT FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT WORK PROGRAM 9) Drainage Study Completed, Report to April 16, 1999 Lindhal, Browning. Council, February 2000 10) School Siting and Selected Tishler & Presentation of draft Staff is currently Concurrency Study Assoc. as consultant. to City Council May working with the Initial draft 2000 Consultant and completed. School Board staff. 11) Development Completed and June 14, 1999 Amendments to Review Process; Implemented. review process. Analysis and Improvements 12) Implement Implemented August 1999 Concurrent Processing of Petitions 13) Process NOPC at Completed Completed Regional Center April 2000 14) PB County Completed and July 2000 Process in place Concurrency Review adopted Interlocal Agreement UPDATED: May 11, 2000 OG�� 05/12/00 FRI 10:32 FAX 3013204860 Tischler & Associates to 002 Th,i,au RR & AssoCLUEs, INC 4701 Sangamore Road Suite N210 Bethesda, MD 20816 (301) 320 -6900 Fax: (301) 3204860 80 Annandale Road Pasadea. CA 91105 -1404 (818) 790 -6170 Fax: (818) 790-6235 Memorandum To: Steven B. Cramer, AICP Principal Planner Palm Beach Gardens From: Paul S. Tischler Tischler & Associates, Inc. Date: May 12, 2000 Re: Summary of Findings Pertaining to Public School Pupil Forecasts (800) 424 -4318 Nature of Assignment. Tischler & Associates, Inc. (TA) has evaluated the pupil generation rates and the five year Capital Facilities Plan currently utilized by tischlerassociates.com the Palm Beach County School District and calculated the likely percent utilization of the relevant public schools as they will be affected by new growth in the Palm Beach Gardens area. TA has worked with many school districts and prepared school impact fees in Florida and elsewhere is familiar with various options for pupil generation forecasting. • County Pupil Generation Forecast Methodologies. There are basically two pupil generation rates that exist in the County. The first, utilized by the School District, is a per person pupil generation rate of 0.1398 which is applied against the forecasted increase in population. This figure, which is unrelated to school coneurrency issues, is utilized in conjunction with the School District's cohort survival projection methodology -for near term pupil Forecasts. A second pupil generation forecast methodology is used for concurrency issues, The School District provided TA a draft work product indicating the public school generation rates (multipliers) which will be applied against all new housing units for calculating concurrency. Unlike the current pupil generation rate used in the County, based on population, this is more appropriately based on single family detached or multi- family housing units. The average for single family detached is 0.255 public school children per unit and for multi - family it is 0.156 per unit. 4 New Housing Forecast. Based on specific development projections provided by staff of Palm Beach Gardens and Jupiter, the increase in housing units between 2000 and 2005 is expected to be 6,458 for Jupiter and 5,487 for Palm 13each Gardens. This compares to the residential units projected by the Palm Beach Fiscal impactAnatysis County Planning Department for the same period of 3,170 and 3,458, respectively. Capital facility Analysis The two jurisdictions project an increase of 5,317 more housing units o � .Sl f/ - tmpad Fee Systems year span than reflected in the County forecasts. Growth Policy Plannino Ge�deS C a tQ�- Economic and fdarkct Analysts lo MUNIES, FISCALS 8 CklM Fiscal impact systems tailored (,$ �1 for each eonrcmunity 05/12/00 FRI 10:32 FAX 3013204860 Tischler & Associates Wj003 . Capacity Forecasts. Based on a review of capacity forecasts from the school system and the above information, the greatest increase in public school students for the County schools will be in the elementary, followed by middle schools. Given the anticipated increases in school capacity for those schools affecting Jupiter and Palm Beach Gardens, the schools will be over capacity in 2006 as follows - higl_i school, 4 %; middle school, 3% and elementary school, 4 %. However, it is important to note that if the anticipated expansions to the middle school and elementary schools are not achieved, the percent overutilization for middle school and elementary school would be 44% and 19 %, respectively. It is also important to note that an important funding source for allowing the School District to achieve the capital facility plan is the issuance of "certificates of participation and/or seeking voter approval for an alternative funding source." This funding source, estimated to be over $326 million, will represent over 25% of the total funds needed to implement the capital budget. • • Next Steps. TA recommends that ftmher analysis be conducted to determine the likelihood of the School District obtaining the revenues as reflected in the capital budget and also the specific status of the proposed capital improvements which will affect the middle and elementary school capacities serving Palm Beach Gardens. &L O-L.4 2 Tischler & Associates, Inc. Joseph R. Russo Mayor of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail P.B.G Fl 33410 11 15' P740�� April 1.8 2000 PETITION TO MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO FROM THE RESIDENTS OF GARDEN WOODS Pursuant to our petition dated August 09, 1999, we would like to .respectfully submit another petition in support of changing resolution 147, 1999. The proposed location for the new railway crossing is only 500 ft from our neighborhood and will bring much more noise than the actual PGA railway crossing. It will also impede our real estate values. The location of that railway crossing would require from the PGA Flyover project, a SW ramp railway crossing overpass, a longer ramp approach, and a road intersection at Alt Al and Kyoto Drive, at a cost of approximately 1/2 million dollars. We believe it is a.waste of public money. We therefore also ask for the cancellation of the SW.ramp railway crossing. overpass. We request the location for the new railway crossing to be located south of PGA Blvd, in an undeveloped land. That location, originally presented by the Florida Department of Transportation (F.D.O.T) in their October 1992 plan, also has a direct connection between Alt Al (State Road 811) and Military Trail by going under the PGA Flyover. It would reduce the already very high price tag for the PGA project, and minimize the train horn noise to our neighborhood. We are also asking that there be no linkage roads at the northern and southern ends of Banyan Street, with Divosta's parcel 4.5 (The Isles) to the north and PGA North, Ltd's parcel 5Ala/5A2a to the south. For the parcel 5Ala/5A2a at the southern end of Banyan Street, we are-asking a change from industrial zoning, to office and residential zoning (small buildings). An industrial park would certainly impede the real estate values in Plat 4. It would also increase the traffic on Military Trail. Our neighbors Roger Blangy, Sharon Long, Alex Perez, Gilda Gomez, Manuel Garcia, have volunteered to represent us for. the above matters. We sincerely hope you will take this request in full consideration. The residents of Gardens Woods have signed on the back of this petition. Very truly yo s, Pat rt 3 3 40 30 A14 A75 ,,j a hn Owen 6 4�a- Z/i i<.E\, ir1 $T6s fZ L ►,,-)& NOCA f l b y 8. 146M to cl( s i va 4a /V IA I-oee S7 761 HEH4dCkS7-, 9' U ►774 NV-za, 1�Co��P Allt a- S a4. �erfr c, WWg fz�t T mltfl-l� A LAo I i 1°� 1`s r( srKjE -- �` y V C) 4�e Joseph R. Russo Mayor of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail P.B.G F133410 April 18 2000 PETITION TO MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO FROM THE RESIDENTS OF GARDEN WOODS Pursuant to our petition dated August 09, 1999, we would like to respectfully submit,another petition in support of changing resolution 147, 1999. The proposed location for the new railway crossing is only 500 ft from our neighborhood and will bring much more noise than the actual PGA railway crossing. It will also impede our real estate values. The location of that railway crossing would require from the PGA Flyover project, a SW ramp railway crossing overpass, a longer ramp approach, and a road intersection at Alt Al and Kyoto Drive, at a cost of approximately 1/2 million dollars. We believe it is a waste of public money. We therefore also ask for the cancellation of the SW ramp railway crossing overpass. We request the location for the new railway crossing to be located south of PGA Blvd, in an undeveloped land. That location, originally presented by the Florida Department of Transportation (F.D.O.T) in their October 1992 plan, also has a direct connection between Alt Al (State Road 811) and Military Trail by going under the PGA Flyover. It would reduce the already very high price tag for the PGA project, and minimize the train horn .noise to our neighborhood. We are also asking that there be no linkage roads at the northern and southem ends of Banyan Street, with Divosta's parcel 4.5 (The Isles) to the north and PGA North, Ltd's parcel 5Ala/5A2a to the south. For the parcel 5A1a/5A2a at the southern end of Banyan Street, we are asking a change from industrial zoning, to office and residential zoning (small buildings). An industrial park would certainly impede the real estate values in Plat 4. It would also increase the. traffic on Military Trail. Our neighbors Roger Blangy, Sharon Long, Alex Perez, Gilda Gomez, Manuel Garcia, have volunteered to represent us for the above matters. We sincerely hope you will take this request in full consideration. The residents of Gardens Woods have signed on the back of this petition. Very truly yours, At v H Al G v. I/ �I �/6-iWz�ck j C�2-2-Y ar ( 40 /&419 BAWAJ 117/4- 44-V YA-i -37- -5oc,Y)vIE Fy ll.J' I�Y�Oyt Ir t C6-rt CC kC A , 113 6) 1Y ko r,4 ee*j1 ?����a� � y y3& jr l- )C( C.J4A0rA-e f f 1(170 )14t4--9 e5; /V/p ��C'f�i�ll�J'2 F�EuS 3 � / S f7e.�, Joseph R. Russo Mayor of Palm Beach Gardens April .18 2000 10500 N. Military Trail P.B.G F133410 PETITION TO MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO FROM THE RESIDENTS OF GARDEN WOODS Pursuant to our petition dated August 09, 1999, we would like to respectfully submit another petition in support of changing resolution 147, 1999. The proposed location for.the new railway crossing is only 500 ft from our neighborhood and will bring much more noise than the actual PGA railway crossing. It will also impede our real estate values. The location of that railway crossing would require from the PGA Flyover project, a SW ramp railway crossing overpass, a longer ramp approach, and a road intersection at Alt Al and Kyoto Drive, at a cost of approximately 1/2 million dollars. We believe it is a waste of public money. We therefore also ask for the cancellation of the SW ramp railway crossing overpass. We request the location for the new railway crossing to be located south of PGA Blvd, in an undeveloped land. That location, originally presented by the Florida Department of Transportation (F.D.O.T) in their October 1992 plan, also has a direct connection between Alt Al (State Road 811) and Military Trail by going under the PGA Flyover. It would reduce the already very high price tag for the PGA project, and minimize the train hom noise to our neighborhood. We are also asking that there be no linkage roads at the northern and southern ends of Banyan Street, with Divosta's parcel 4.5 (The Isles) to the north and PGA North, Ltd's parcel 5Ala/5A2a to the south. For the parcel 5Ala/5A2a at the southern end of Banyan Street, we are asking .a change from industrial zoning, to office and residential zoning (small buildings). An industrial park would certainly impede the real estate values in Plat 4. It would also increase the traffic on Military Trail. Our neighbors Roger Blangy, Sharon Long, Alex Perez, Gilda Gomez, Manuel Garcia, have volunteered to represent us for the above matters. We sincerely hope you will take this request in full consideration. The residents of Gardens Woods have signed on the back of this petition. Very truly yours, f VC L fn S y363 h7 9z--iic—L61,e _ y , zo 6141"Uel tkJ / �- sl- e Ck f Sy- C 4- A® Cc)R)A i l Gc ti• MAY- IZI� 116 z l, s� ��f� 4 9 c 11Z -7 � M � jGtr e� �`�-�e�ct 1) &3 8 Cut � c2� U 40 CTO W -I z- -7 5--Y4 z C-c- AUE D rkPi-rHR-\IfV Ct--V�Te- VE 12- E-Al C. - D 4) U 6 H 6?� 7- Joseph R. Russo Mayor of Palm Beach Gardens April 18 2000 10500 N. Military Trail P.B.G F133410 PETITION TO MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO FROM THE RESIDENTS OF GARDEN WOODS Pursuant to our petition dated August 09, 1999, we would like to respectfully submit another petition in support of changing resolution 147, 1999. The proposed location for the new railway crossing is only 500 ft from our neighborhood and will bring much more noise than the actual PGA railway crossing. It will also impede our real estate values. The location of that railway crossing would require from the PGA Flyover project, a SW ramp railway crossing overpass, a longer ramp approach, and a road intersection at Alt Al and Kyoto Drive, at a cost of approximately 1/2 million dollars. We believe it is a waste of public money. We therefore also ask for the cancellation of the SW ramp railway crossing overpass. We request the location for the new railway crossing to be located south of PGA Blvd, in an undeveloped land. That location, originally presented by the Florida Department of Transportation (F.D.O.T) in their October 1992 plan, also has a direct connection between Alt Al (State Road 811) and Military Trail by going under the PGA Flyover. It would reduce the already very high price tag for the PGA project, and minimize the train hom noise to our neighborhood. We are also asking that there be no linkage roads at the northern and southern ends of Banyan Street, with Divosta's parcel 4.5 (The Isles) to the north and PGA North, Ltd's parcel 5A1 a/5A2a to the south. For the parcel 5Al a/5A2a at the southern end of Banyan Street, we are asking a change from industrial zoning, to office and residential zoning (small buildings). An industrial park would certainly impede the real estate values in Plat 4. It would also increase the traffic on Military Trail. Our neighbors Roger Blangy, Sharon Long, Alex Perez, Gilda Gomez, Manuel Garcia, have volunteered to represent us for the above matters. We sincerely hope you will take this request in full consideration. The residents of Gardens Woods have signed on the back of this petition. Very truly yours, 3 "V 0-0 r�,Z, /U H -D -1-41J4 3 h,, 9//-3 (fAmt btm Av e Alv, 5 yo98 Cafal lq A-w-. t��Ng�✓ �'i'T�M/ES'O�/ 40 -7 7 C---$A P6" /4" ¢V6 ��,-,� �G �,� S r cq Zz 0�,, 4y,, /P44 A�� , 14v- fqL. F n y SO4" b a. h a, U Ct �a, /�I,4ie-%lb (ptirevti 1I9 �6 CwfilloA4- 4ve io� c cc 40PO Li L o CA L rq Lo -oPPA fir`, i • _ Joseph R. Russo Mayor of Palm Beach Gardens April 18 2000 10500 N. Military Trail P.B.G Fl 33410 PETITION TO MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO FROM THE RESIDENTS OF GARDEN WOODS Pursuant to our petition dated August 09, 1999, we would like to respectfully submit another petition in support of changing resolution 147, 1999. The proposed location for the new railway crossing is only 500 ft from our neighborhood and will bring much more noise than the actual PGA railway crossing. It will also impede our real estate values. The location of that railway crossing would require from the PGA Flyover project, a SW ramp railway crossing overpass, a longer ramp approach, and a road intersection at Alt A I A and Kyoto Drive, at a cost of approximately 1/2 million dollars. We believe it is a waste of public money. We therefore also ask for the cancellation of the SW ramp railway crossing overpass. We request the location for the new railway crossing to be located south of PGA Blvd, in an undeveloped land. That location, originally presented by the .Florida Department of Transportation (F.D.O.T) in their October 1992 plan, also has a direct connection between Alt AlA (State Road 811) and Military Trail by going under the PGA Flyover. It would reduce the already very high price tag for the PGA project, and minimize the train hom noise to our neighborhood. We are also asking that there be no linkage roads at the northern and southern ends of Banyan Street, with Divosta's parcel 4.5 (The Isles) to the north and PGA North, Ltd's parcel 5A1a/5A2a to the south. For the parcel 5Ala/5A2a at the southern end of Banyan Street, we are asking .a change from industrial zoning, to office and residential zoning (small buildings). An industrial park would certainly impede the real estate values in Plat 4. It would also increase the traffic on Military Trail. Our neighbors Roger Blangy, Sharon Long, Alex Perez, Gilda Gomez, Manuel Garcia, have volunteered to represent us for the above matters. We sincerely hope you will take this request in full consideration. The residents of Gardens Woods have signed on the back of this petition. Very truly yours, Al 0 j)4 J,.) Zz 15 t), ,) - T L-' - 671, � 4Qc etallo.A lee ;+ [AAr � I,\) kul") Av�-- �qf—tl e!2&4go� eovr- qt 6 5 LI.WPL'n! AUL . -Z/ i 4-5 e, �, Ave A 14a &Acor N,)e q 12--� Ce �cw . �A j 4 Q �� e; �� li7ay �'/laooc (-k-c p®cm O) Cw ;l KeRg cl!rD6w Vvt,-, %(Cwlj*�Nq tir3, a,kci4 ST Z/Z, x l 19 Z 7 & -cA'� / l9 /<3 &iee)y s,"- r 19yi '61 sr, C\ A J C�PXX71 61� Opp �1 V 1-9 j7e-v Joseph R. Russo Mayor of Palm Beach Gardens April 18 2000 10500 N. Military Trail P.B.G F133410 PETITION TO MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO FROM THE RESIDENTS OF GARDEN WOODS Pursuant to our petition dated August 09, 1999, we would like to respectfully submit another petition in support of changing resolution 147, 1999. The proposed location for the new railway crossing is only 500 ft from our neighborhood and will bring much more'noise than the actual PGA railway crossing. It will also impede our real estate values. The location of that railway crossing would require from the PGA Flyover project, a SW ramp railway crossing overpass, a longer ramp approach, and a road intersection at Alt Al and Kyoto Drive, at a cost of approximately 1/2 million dollars. We believe it is a waste of public money. We therefore also ask for the cancellation of the SW ramp railway crossing overpass. We request the location for the new railway crossing to be located south of PGA Blvd, in an undeveloped land. That location, originally presented by the Florida Department of Transportation (F.D.O.T) in their October 1992 plan, also has a direct connection between Alt Al A (State Road 811) and Military Trail by going under the PGA Flyover. It would reduce the already very high price tag for the PGA project, and minimize the train hom noise to our neighborhood. We are also asking that there be no linkage roads at the northern and southern ends of Banyan Street, with Divosta's parcel 4.5 (The Isles) to the north and PGA North, Ltd's parcel 5A1 a/5A2a to the south. For the parcel 5Ala/5A2a at the southern end of Banyan Street, we are asking .a change from industrial zoning, to office and residential zoning (small buildings). An industrial park would certainly impede the real estate values in Plat 4. It would also increase the traffic on Military Trail. Our neighbors Roger Blangy, Sharon Long, Alex Perez, Gilda Gomez, Manuel Garcia, have volunteered to represent us for the above matters. We sincerely hope you will take this request in full consideration. The residents of Gardens Woods have signed on the back of this petition. Very truly yours, n/A -4�' l2 '�' l'�G�///H�N 'Sl °ci/ �evL9% s�vMa�rz elfAS,�ni �,Q� C'E�>a�, 7iilc ,/ fi U �AS �2J o qI(3 OA�A)L-)r H,v I - yid n'( a �IIrlDrcl 7) 69 -hA e � c QA ` r yIq3 V/ z1 Ll L5A « -7 n (op q-30�a 43S-7 q3'7,5 Yq-�ne M62- Ftr L 0,,v, Il6ol r`'ir VA fade w4 4�73�� `7 !�; I Joseph R. Russo Mayor of Palm Beach Gardens April 18 2000 10500 N. Military Trail P.B.G F133410 PETITION TO MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO FROM THE RESIDENTS OF GARDEN WOODS Pursuant to our petition dated August 09, 1999, we would like to respectfully submit another petition in support of changing resolution 147, 1999. The proposed location for the new railway crossing is only 500 ft from our neighborhood and will bring much more noise than the actual PGA railway crossing. It will also impede our real estate values. The location of that railway crossing would require from the PGA Flyover project, a SW ramp railway crossing overpass, a longer ramp approach, and a road intersection at Alt Al and Kyoto Drive, at a cost of approximately 1/2 million dollars. We believe it is a waste of public money. We therefore also ask for the cancellation of the SW ramp railway crossing overpass. We request the location for the new railway crossing to be located south of PGA Blvd, in an undeveloped land. That location, originally presented by the Florida Department of Transportation (F.D.O.T) in their October 1992 plan, also has a direct connection between Alt Al A (State Road 811) and Military Trail by going under the PGA Flyover. It would reduce the already very high price tag for the PGA project, and minimize the train hom noise to our neighborhood. We are also asking that there be no linkage roads at the northern and southern ends of Banyan Street, with Divosta's parcel 4.5 (The Isles) to the north and PGA North, Ltd's parcel 5Ala/5A2a to the south. For the parcel 5Ala/5A2a at the southern end of Banyan Street, we are asking .a change from industrial zoning, to office and residential zoning (small buildings). An industrial park would certainly impede the real estate values in Plat 4. It would also increase the traffic on Military Trail. Our neighbors Roger Blangy, Sharon Long, Alex Perez, Gilda Gomez, Manuel Garcia, have volunteered to represent us for the above matters. We sincerely hope you will take this request in full consideration. The residents of Gardens Woods have signed on the back of this petition. Very truly yours, chr�ssy `���ecs Ken n��h �a�nG �J se A -�>-2> //-- s s �J wzai p e)G - ��/ Ave- rn /:ae Iq 1,5a 8 eec� Alt xl/x���JGV7 Pb& 4131 C3 flee ?V-&N �f I ® (o T) e-eck Ate p.0,6. 11 � Ci a &C, Svc. Ave if I 7 Z2 CO I AL • ff • 1"1 Ork G)i v wt)DJ A\1e- j wZ4ii W3-30 `l E Ss- F Qv.Z"ry �I m � S �,Vy oe �Rla?v Joseph R. Russo Mayor of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail P.B.G F133410 April 18 2000 PETITION TO MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO FROM THE RESIDENTS OF GARDEN WOODS Pursuant to our petition dated August 09, 1999, we would like to respectfully submit another petition in support of changing resolution 147, 1999. The proposed location for the new railway crossing is only 500 ft from our neighborhood and will bring much more noise than the actual PGA railway crossing. It will also impede our real estate values. The location of that railway crossing would require from the PGA Flyover project, a SW ramp railway crossing overpass, a longer ramp approach, and a road intersection at Alt Al and Kyoto Drive, at a cost of approximately 1/2 million dollars. We believe it is a waste of public money. We therefore also ask for the cancellation of the SW ramp railway crossing overpass. We request the location for the new railway crossing to be located south of PGA Blvd, in an undeveloped land. That location, originally presented by the Florida Department of Transportation (F.D.O.T) in their October 1992 plan, also has a direct, connection between Alt Al (State Road 811) and Military Trail by going under the PGA Flyover. It would reduce the already very high price tag for the PGA project, and minimize the train horn noise to our neighborhood. We are also asking that there be no linkage roads at the northern and southern ends of Banyan Street, with Divosta's parcel 4.5 (The Isles) to the north and PGA North, Ltd's parcel 5Ala/5A2a to the south. For the parcel 5Ala/5A2a at the southern end of Banyan Street, we are asking .a change from industrial zoning, to office and residential zoning (small buildings). An industrial park would certainly impede the real estate values in Plat 4. It would also increase the traffic on Military Trail. Our neighbors Roger Blangy, Sharon Long, Alex Perez, Gilda Gomez, Manuel Garcia, have volunteered to represent us for the above matters. We sincerely hope you will take this request in full consideration. The residents of Gardens Woods have signed on the back of this petition. Very truly yours, 1 N i /V fi d4 2S S l �� if/r4 T Lk dT- T-2) 4-j J414Z B��C Ef- WNW \\J ax C t4 t6 sAAWC4 oq -7 C OES77Y v -r � SREN D^ Coo KE e'e�14 L p5 um T,w5-r K)'Nes,<zAlf 41q2 FLm ME , �1I'S'P3'CQI��I X;:� �'�� i� �n�` �( R� P 6 Y-�q 0 1 (un1 C, sft*� 90 � � Au e Avi� (cl��Z9-0j PC-, I ti-7 as 4& 5� Joseph R. Russo Mayor of Palm Beach Gardens April 18 2000 10500 N. Military Trail P.B.G F1 334 10 PETITION TO MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO FROM THE RESIDENTS OF GARDEN WOODS Pursuant to our petition dated August 09, 1999, we would like to respectfully submit another petition in support of changing resolution 147, 1999. The proposed location for the new railway crossing is only 500 ft from our neighborhood and will bring much more noise than the actual PGA railway crossing. It will also impede our real estate values. The location of that railway crossing would require from the PGA Flyover project, a SW ramp railway crossing overpass, a longer ramp approach, and a road intersection at Alt Al and Kyoto Drive, at a cost of approximately 1/2 million dollars. We believe it is a waste of public money. We therefore also ask for the cancellation of the SW ramp railway crossing overpass. We request the location for the new railway crossing to be located south of PGA Blvd, in an undeveloped land. That location, originally presented by the .Florida Department of Transportation (F.D.O.T) in their October 1992 plan, also has a direct connection between Alt Al (State Road 811) and Military Trail by going under the PGA Flyover. It would reduce the already very high price tag for the PGA project, and minimize the train horn noise to our neighborhood. We are also asking that there be no linkage roads at the northern and southern ends of Banyan Street, with Divosta's parcel 4.5 (The Isles) to the north and PGA North, Ltd's parcel 5Ala/5A2a to the south. For the parcel 5Ala/5A2a at the southern end of Banyan Street, we are asking .a change from industrial zoning, to office and residential zoning (small buildings). An industrial park would certainly impede the real estate values in Plat 4. It would also increase the traffic on Military Trail. Our neighbors Roger Blangy, Sharon Long, Alex Perez, Gilda Gomez, Manuel Garcia, have volunteered to represent us for the above matters. We sincerely hope you will take this request in full consideration. The residents of Gardens Woods have signed on the back of this petition. Very truly yours, r� err f?Ol., r:% L.-J �UQ %it/J C „V AA lcbtIt 6, Vey,/ ?3tecti S+ 8 t p- C'L �,4-, s ,/ �-yw �-o,ez 1 1 -1 Oct vU (o w�lS� V Joseph R. Russo Mayor of Palm Beach Gardens April 18 2000 10500 N. Military Trail P.B.G Fl 33410 PETITION TO MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO FROM THE RESIDENTS OF GARDEN WOODS Pursuant to our petition dated August 09, 1999, we would like to respectfully submit another petition in support of changing resolution 147, 1999. The proposed location for the new railway crossing is only 500 ft from our neighborhood and will bring much more noise than the actual PGA railway crossing. It will also impede our real estate values. The location of that railway crossing would require from the PGA Flyover project, a SW ramp railway crossing overpass, a longer ramp approach, and a road intersection at Alt A I A and Kyoto Drive, at a cost of approximately 1/2 million dollars. We believe it is a waste of public money. We therefore also ask for the cancellation of the SW ramp railway crossing overpass. We request the location for the new railway crossing to be located south of PGA Blvd, in an undeveloped land. That location, originally presented by the Florida Department of Transportation (F.D.O.T) in their October 1992 plan, also has a direct connection between Alt Al (State Road 811) and Military Trail by going under the PGA Flyover. It would reduce the already very high price tag for the PGA project, and minimize the train horn noise to our neighborhood. We are also asking that there be no linkage roads at the northern and southern ends of Banyan Street, with Divosta's parcel 4.5 (The Isles) to the north and PGA North, Ltd's parcel 5Ala/5A2a to the south. For the parcel 5Al a/5A2a at the southern end of Banyan Street, we are asking a change from industrial zoning, to office and residential zoning (small buildings). An industrial park would certainly impede the real estate values in Plat 4. It would also increase the traffic on Military Trail. Our neighbors Roger Blangy, Sharon Long, Alex Perez, Gilda Gomez, Manuel Garcia, _ have volunteered to represent us for the above matters. We sincerely hope you will take this request in full consideration. The residents of Gardens Woods have signed on the back of this petition. Very truly yours, C� I IV' T Al',l�� E- 5 THER FR C Y x� IV / -eO Z 2- ,,'/k/S 1*%arwc l F, � `4 y�s3 L b)S�II A 17 4 i /0,6& - Joseph R. Russo Mayor of Palm Beach Gardens April 18 2000 10500 N. Military Trail P.B.G F133410 PETITION TO MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO FROM THE RESIDENTS OF GARDEN WOODS Pursuant to our petition dated August 09, 1999, we would like to respectfully submit another petition in support of changing resolution 147, 1999. The proposed location for the new railway crossing is only 500 ft from our neighborhood and will bring much more noise than the actual PGA railway crossing. It will also impede our real estate values. The location of that railway crossing would require from the PGA Flyover project, a SW ramp railway crossing overpass, a longer ramp approach, and a road intersection at Alt A I A and Kyoto Drive, at a cost of approximately 1/2 million dollars. We believe it is a waste of public money. We therefore also ask for the cancellation of the SW ramp railway crossing overpass. We request the location for the new railway crossing to be located south of PGA Blvd, in an undeveloped land. That location, originally presented by the Florida Department of Transportation (F.D.O.T) in their October 1992 plan, also has a direct connection between Alt Al (State Road 811) and Military Trail by going under the PGA Flyover. It would reduce the .already very high price tag for _the PGA project, and minimize the train horn noise to our neighborhood. We are also asking that there be no linkage roads at the northern and southern ends of Banyan Street, with Divosta's parcel 4.5 (The Isles) to the north and PGA North, Ltd's parcel 5Ala/5A2a to the south. For the parcel 5A1 a/5A2a at the southern end of Banyan Street, we are asking a change from industrial zoning, to office and residential zoning (small buildings). An industrial park would certainly impede the real estate values in Plat 4. It would also increase the traffic on Military Trail. Our neighbors Roger Blangy, Sharon Long, Alex Perez, Gilda Gomez, Manuel Garcia,. - _ have volunteered to represent us for the above matters. We sincerely hope you will take this request in full consideration. The residents of Gardens Woods have signed on the back of this petition. Very truly yours, PRINT NAME o-c,�;7 61 �eww �4p',\-N-�X. A \4 \o,s�o5 I onnoz- �'pp Pie 0 � -Ws s 516 NATUR5 rot awC�. lV /2 6S"/ Joseph R. Russo Mayor of Palm Beach Gardens April 18 2000 10500 N. Military Trail P.B.G F133410 PETITION TO MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO FROM THE RESIDENTS OF GARDEN WOODS Pursuant to our petition dated August 09, 1999, we would like to respectfully submit another petition in support of changing resolution 147, 1999. The proposed location for the new railway crossing is only 500 ft from our neighborhood and will bring much more noise than the actual PGA railway crossing. It will also impede our real estate values. The location of that railway crossing would require from the PGA Flyover project, a SW ramp railway crossing overpass, a longer ramp approach, and a road intersection at Alt Al and Kyoto Drive, at a cost of approximately 1/2 million dollars. We believe it is a waste of public money. We therefore also ask for the cancellation of the SW ramp railway crossing overpass. We request the location for the new railway crossing to be located south of PGA Blvd, in an undeveloped land. That location, originally presented by the Florida Department of Transportation (F.D.O.T) in their October 1992 plan, also has a direct connection between Alt Al (State Road 811) and Military Trail by going under the PGA Flyover. It would reduce the already very high price tag for the PGA project, and minimize the train hom noise to our neighborhood. We are also asking that there be no linkage roads at the northern and southern ends of Banyan Street, with Divosta's parcel 4.5 (The Isles) to the north and PGA North, Ltd's parcel 5A1 a/5A2a to the south. For the parcel 5A1a/5A2a at the southern end of Banyan Street, we are asking a change from industrial zoning, to office and residential zoning (small buildings). An industrial park would certainly impede the real estate values in Plat 4. It would also increase the traffic on Military Trail. Our neighbors Roger Blangy, Sharon Long, Alex Perez, Gilda Gomez, Manuel Garcia, have volunteered to represent us for the above matters. We sincerely hope you will take this request in full consideration. The residents of Gardens Woods have signed on the back of this petition. Very truly yours, i Pfd ANT N AMF-7 SRARON B. LONG CicZO�- C tic-r � r✓�s Li 6A S,T•, T� ® *26.7 L(N�t i W�_ �a a �- �,,(n ito- 4 �4*, l i a S Q �- mbc L% 19),3 #Z:Yn c.0C1-f 57- 119 010 -ern I vc tc -s+ J [� cl'� UF_ NAJ I S \T WEE LgUAB�P��e 1 I gds �G� IV,9RX 12 XU41­7 c- . Rlll D 4. #'qC06CMIew -Do, P,, IN Joh'al G%eryl Jc) Ef2.5e /fE c_ W _ / /e ;'q //X)l tl e,V Lc c K 114107 � o r (91(1 ---64mONt. t1g32 gA�Yk f&NA-Tu RE (JA /V )'IfA) s� 1e(2- ; 40J.Wee. F�M�' v"mema.-M Joseph R. Russo Mayor of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail P.B.G F133410 / � / / S- 147Z,2 April 18 2000 PETITION TO MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO FROM THE RESIDENTS OF GARDEN WOODS Pursuant to our petition dated August 09, 1999, we would like to respectfully submit another petition in support of changing resolution 147, 1999. The proposed location for the new railway crossing is only 500 ft from our neighborhood and will bring much more noise than the actual PGA railway crossing. It will also impede our real estate values. The location of that railway crossing would require from the PGA Flyover project, a SW ramp railway crossing overpass, a longer ramp approach, and a road intersection at Alt A I A and Kyoto Drive, at a cost of approximately 1/2 million dollars. We believe it is a waste of public money. We therefore also ask for the cancellation of the SW ramp railway crossing overpass. We request the location for the new railway crossing to be located south of PGA Blvd, in an undeveloped land. That location, originally presented by the Florida Department of Transportation (F.D.O.T) in their October 1992 plan, also has a direct connection between Alt Al (State Road 811) and Military Trail by going under the PGA Flyover. It would reduce the already very high price tag for the PGA project, and minimize the train horn noise to our neighborhood. We are also asking that there be no linkage roads at the northern and southern ends of Banyan Street, with Divosta's parcel 4.5 (The Isles) to the north and PGA North, Ltd's parcel 5Ala/5A2a to the south. For the parcel 5Ala/5A2a at the southern end of Banyan Street, we are asking .a change from industrial zoning, to office and residential zoning (small buildings). An industrial park would certainly impede the real estate values in Plat 4. It would also increase the traffic on Military Trail. Our neighbors Roger Blangy, Sharon Long, Alex Perez, Gilda Gomez, Manuel Garcia, have volunteered to represent us for the above matters. We sincerely hope you will take this request in full consideration. The residents of Gardens Woods have signed on the back of this petition. Very truly yours, PRN-C NAME uK SE Tr A VIA, 10C �r- �� Od 5 Ott aIZ-1s / R ' 73 a44 • �`� `f 3 9 �-/, /L Z- v c/c ! % !/�i�aNtc6q S✓1/�d�,E d k-• N 2�2;�~ l 8 CFILObo� S7 � 0 Vl-\ Ja V4L I f3. Mu $14N f--o kt,— �t�. o4 [k�w -folpo [ � r/ e ���G fi C��O� ���D�i�A� �l3� �10r�► Y Oo 6w �� i� Joseph R. Russo Mayor of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail P.B.G F133410 l4 � /s lar,2 April 18 2000 PETITION TO MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO FROM THE RESIDENTS OF GARDEN WOODS Pursuant to our petition dated August 09, 1999, we would like to respectfully submit another petition in support of changing resolution 147, 1999. The proposed location for the new railway crossing is only 500 ft from our neighborhood and will bring much more noise than the actual PGA railway crossing. It will also impede our real estate values. The location of that railway crossing would require from the PGA Flyover project, a SW ramp railway crossing overpass, a longer ramp approach, and a road intersection at Alt Al and Kyoto Drive, at a cost of approximately 1/2 million dollars. We believe it is a waste of public money. We therefore also ask for the cancellation of the SW ramp railway crossing overpass. We request the location for the new railway crossing to be located south of PGA Blvd, in an undeveloped land. That location, originally presented by the Florida Department of Transportation (F.D.O.T) in their October 1992 plan, also has a direct connection between Alt Al (State Road 811) and Military Trail by going under the PGA Flyover. It would reduce the already very high price tag for the PGA project, and minimize the train horn noise to our neighborhood. We are also asking that there be no linkage roads at the northern and southern ends of Banyan Street, with Divosta's parcel 4.5 (The Isles) to the north and PGA North, Ltd's parcel 5A1a/5A2a to the south. For the parcel 5Ala/5A2a at the southern end of Banyan Street, we are asking .a change from industrial zoning, to office and residential zoning (small buildings). An industrial park would certainly impede the real estate values in Plat 4. It would also increase the traffic on Military Trail. Our neighbors Roger Blangy, Sharon Long, Alex Perez, Gilda Gomez, Manuel Garcia, have volunteered to represent us for the above matters. We sincerely hope you will take this request in full consideration. The residents of Gardens Woods have signed on the back of this petition. Very truly yours, �flf /7A/ne Z Alen S�tine��e� /tiv,4110 Moull r, 0045 ll / %Yp Xcj77_. t/UTS� /167 11 ovu± er-n4ct 11899 g�- �►� 13 L�1�f ����1 si. I M ,l) ��19•riv cv��t�' /� l�6 .P*,KY 9-#-w �vo /Silt �lliaw,- c142 A5 ST. j % 9tia Ash S +• 11 18,1 (J�h JL // PX-Y /YS// Sr I C4:1- 6� Joseph R. Russo Mayor of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail P.B.G F133410 April 18 2000 PETITION TO MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO FROM THE RESIDENTS OF GARDEN WOODS Pursuant to our petition dated August 09, 1999, we would like to respectfully submit another petition in support of changing resolution 147, 1999. The proposed location for the new railway crossing is only 500 ft from our neighborhood and will bring much more noise than the actual PGA railway crossing. It will also impede our real estate values. The location of that railway crossing would require from the PGA Flyover project, a SW ramp railway crossing overpass, a longer ramp approach, and a road intersection at Alt Al and Kyoto Drive, at a cost of approximately 1/2 million dollars. We believe it is a waste of public money.. We therefore also ask for the cancellation of the SW ramp railway crossing overpass. We request the location for the new railway crossing to be located south of PGA Blvd, in an undeveloped land. That location, originally presented by the Florida Department of Transportation (F.D.O.T) in their October 1992 plan, also has a direct connection between Alt Al (State-Road 811) and Military Trail by going under the PGA Flyover. It would reduce the already very high price tag for the PGA project, and minimize the train horn noise to our neighborhood. We are also asking that there be no linkage roads at the northern and southern ends of Banyan Street, with Divosta's parcel 4.5 (The Isles) to the north and PGA North, Ltd's parcel 5A1a/5A2a to the south. For the parcel 5Ala/5A2a at the southern end of Banyan Street, we are asking .a change from industrial zoning, to office and residential zoning (small buildings). An industrial park would certainly impede the real estate values in Plat 4. It would also increase the traffic on Military Trail. Our neighbors Roger Blangy, Sharon Long, Alex Perez, Gilda Gomez, Manuel Garcia, have volunteered to represent us for the above matters. We sincerely .hope you will take this request in full consideration. The residents of Gardens Woods have signed on the back of this petition. Very truly yours, :- 9�1-1 17� - Aawods rrI/9RiA C'ftlpe -rton 1i88S 86y6r�ry��, Sr. �m�cheale bldeycn 11885 6d4beyr4 � hurt7 CacAe/c Bg �. /I srs` Bky N KilEa- bzieka,.t 6+�4rry sF. f1�A2iA wE2 q &Vbi (( Mara =AV* lae- V C14 � 4 6�c- G/l y /7 oZ, Pka �% SY* Mrs Bobbie Herakovich City Manager of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens F133410 August 09 1999 PETITION FROM THE RESIDENTS OF PLAT 4 Due to future developments of Parcel 5Ala/5A2a and Parcel 4.05, the residents of Plat 4 are asking the following: 1) Because of repeated floods in 1995 and 1999, a box culvert must be installed as soon as possible at Hood road on the canal west of the Rail road to permit the free flow of flood water going north. In the near future a flood gate must be built south of Hood road to connect with the Colony canal going east to the Inter - coastal to accommodate flood water of new developments in the area. 2) Because a nearby industrial area would certainly impede our real estate value, zoning in parcel 5Ala/5A2a must be changed to eliminate industrial use and make it office buildings and residential buildings only (Height must be restricted). We would appreciate very much if the City could avoid a long delay for the change of zoning in order to accommodate Catalfumo Company. 3) Railroad crossings between Hood road and PGA Blvd coming from Parcel 5Ala/5A2a or Parcel 4.05 must be eliminated or be of the overpass type to avoid train whistling day or night. We would like to point out that the train traffic has increase about three folds since the development of Plat 4 in 1980. It will probably increase again in the future. 4) Beautification of the median on Military trail from Hood road to the I -95 overpass to be done in cooperation with Divosta Company development of Parcel 4.05. The North East entrance to I -95 at Military Trail is also to be replanted with trees that were destroyed when the overpass was built in 1986. Very truly yours, Residents of Plat 4 have signed in the back of this letter. CC: Kenneth Blair, Catalfiimo Company MR & MRS ROGER BLANGY Chuck Hathaway, Divosta Company 11658 HEMLOCK ST Lennart E. Lindahl, City Engineer PALM BEACH GARDENS FLORIDA 33410 Roxanne Manning, Zoning Director Robert Patty, Public Works Director Pete Pimentel, Northern PB County Improvement District Carl Higgins DOT District Maintenance Ft Lauderdale Beth Ingold, Public Information Officer November 8, 1999 RESOLUTION 147,1999 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, SUPPORTING A RAILROAD CROSSING AT KYOTO GARDENS DRIVE/ STATE ROAD 811; AND AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR SAID FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILROAD CROSSING; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the PGA Boulevard/Alternate AIA (State Road 811) urban interchange design provides for a re- located railroad crossing at Kyoto Gardens Drive; and WHEREAS, the City desires said railroad crossing to replace the PGA Boulevard at- grade crossing; and WHEREAS, said crossing is necessary to implement the City's `linkages' plan and conceptual thoroughfare plan; and WHEREAS, the current property owner and proposed developer, PGA North, Ltd_, has expressed the desire for said crossing and will assist the City in the permitting and construction processes. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens supports the railroad crossing at Kyoto Gardens Drive/State Road 811 and authorizes the Interim City Manager to submit an application to the Florida Department of Transportation. Section 2. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS �� DAY OF 1999. ATTEST: f2ND . nOSffiR, CMC, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFI CY CITY ATTORNEY W sn a .r. t 2r. srisz !.� ,e man #1 W 1r •_ r eq � rl �1 Y /� r r .. , f f r f 1 ff 1 i If . 311 j' I I r in � J I I r !� CL � ^I v x I I I I .- • -- - - — — - — — - - - - - - -- - - — - it it It t I it • it 1 1 1 � 1 1 1 .- _. � p 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � 11 W sn a .r. t 2r. srisz !.� ,e man #1 W 1r •_ r eq � rl �1 Y /� r r .. , f f r f 1 ff 1 i If . 311 j' I I � J I I c� CL CL v x I I I I i ; it it It t I it • it � � ii .- _. � _ t � � — � - -- _— _------------ -- r ___ ,— __— __— __— s► _— __— �_R__I_-- _ —__ —_ 1 !- 1• Q► ' I I ♦ ♦ ♦ 1 � f IS I t I . ♦♦ L 1 I I ♦♦ ♦ 1 1 \r_______ Q 1 1 • s � 1 t W W 1 � 8 4 z� Q 0 4 GARDENS AVE :� ' ' A h O �: 070 34!80 0'a8 Ix \1 11% c �II1 d� o � O �Qt QQ a� ti / r an � an �Q v as ---- ----------------------- ---- .----- "a------ . - - - -- - -- ---- - - - - - - - - - - - � m � IL CIL Jv"vF- r�- - -=- 1 \- •Y,.�Lt2r�- 4�4�• KJ�® C3� S — -- ��a�l.a.a'�- "c'%$��6�!X' — -- -19 -9-9 aRA - - - -- - - - -- - - - -- - - -- Fb 0 T- k9 -0- PIL- �-. Q.�— �.ea•( P. 1 } l CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING April 17, 2000 The April 17, 2000, Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, was called to order at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex located at 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida; and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: The City Clerk called the roll and the following elected officials were found to be in attendance: Mayor Joseph R. Russo, Vice Mayor Eric Jablin, Councilmember David Clark, and Councilmember Carl Sabatello. Councilmember Lauren Furtado was absent from the meeting. CITY MANAGER REPORTS: Construction Manager Report: Building Official Jack Hanson reported work was continuing on the air conditioning to make it quieter, insulating the ceiling of the Council chambers was proposed, and outdoor grading work was anticipated to be finished the first part of June. Recreation Director Sue Miller requested a change order to amend the Bell South contract to hire a telephone consultant. Mayor Russo requested research to determine whether this item had been included in the contract with Mr. Casto's firm. Gardens Park Issues - Recreation Director Sue Miller provided a presentation on Gardens Park Issues design flaws. Mayor Russo requested that the City Manager determine responsibility for each item in the report. City Hall Landscaping - City Forester Mark Hendrickson introduced City Landscape Architect Debra Northsea and presented plans for revised City Hall landscaping, estimated to cost $170,000 to $217,000 with funding from bond proceeds. Additional items of irrigation, uplighting, and specimen plants would be presented at a later meeting. Traffic Enforcement Update: Sgt. Glen Brown, Traffic Unit Supervisor provided a presentation regarding traffic enforcement. Discussion ensued regarding slowing traffic on Military Trail and QNorthlake Boulevard. Vice Mayor Jablin recommended traffic speed displays that would attach to telephone cis for which County Commissioner Marcus had offered to pay half the cost, and for which Chief Fitzgerald expressed support. Burns Road/PGA Flyover Update: City Attorney Rubin reported right -of -way issues were still being pursued. A presentation was made which included seven projects for the Burns Road/PGA Flyover construction. Time schedule for activities on PGA Boulevard was estimated at three years. Options for improving Burns Road to move traffic off PGA Boulevard during the flyover construction period were presented. Options for funding for the improvement of Burns Road were discussed, including possible impact fees. Direction to staff was to further research funding. Christ Fellowship Church Management Plan Update: Joseph Ryan, Consultant for the church, announced the new facility would open in two weeks. Growth Management Director Roxanne IsManning reported the management plan was working and improvements were being made. 0 1 10 2 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, 4/17/2000 COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC: Sam Carsillo - Mr. Carsillo expressed pleasure regarding the traffic enforcement presentation. Mr. Carsillo requested that sidewalk construction be resumed. Mr. Carsillo commented on Resolution 35, 2000 which would provide financing for various capital improvements through a loan from Republic Security Bank, and stated that he had believed the developers were going to become involved with payment for the fire stations. Mr. Carsillo commented regarding ts" . &&^ whistles on the FEC railroad that a noise law had been passed in Washington, D.C. Mr. Carsillo requested more motorcycles be used for enforcement of traffic limits. Joan Altwater - Ms. Altwater thanked the Police Department for enforcing speed limits, and reported that County Commissioner Marcus had indicated if the City would enforce speed limits on Northlake Boulevard she was willing to consider dropping the limit to 45 mph, and requested City Council support for this issue. Ms. Altwater questioned access to the hospital during construction of the PGA flyover. Ms. Altwater suggested the City and the County revisit the impact fee structure to determine use of present facilities and perhaps restructure impact fees accordingly, which might contribute some funding for the flyover project. RE -ORDER AGENDA: Vice Mayor Jablin made a motion to re -order the agenda to consider item (b) of the Consent Agenda - Consideration of awarding bid for Bank Line of Credit - after Resolution 35, 2000. Councilman Clark seconded the motion. Motion carried by unanimous 4- 0 vote. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Clark moved approval of the Consent Agenda. now is consisting solely of item (a). Vice Mayor Jablin seconded the motion. Motion carried 4 -0. The following items were approved on the Consent Agenda: a. Approval of Minutes of 3/30/00 Special City Council Meeting. RESOLUTIONS: Resolution 28, 2000 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, Authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to Execute an Agreement with Palm Beach County for the Interlocal Agreement for the North County District Park; and Providing for an Effective Date. Terms of the agreement and the conceptual concept for the park were discussed. The City Attorney explained there were three documents consisting of the interlocal agreement, amendment to the lease purchase and amendment to the option agreement, and the lease agreement. The City Attorney explained that the amendment changed the parties because now the property was owned by CFC and not the Foundation, reduced the price by 15 %, and the only other substantial changes the City and CFC would grant each other were mutual easements for utilities, which would be worked out later. The City Attorney stated that part of the Council's approval would be authorizing the City Manager to execute the amendment to the agreement. The City Attorney clarified that the only change he requested was to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the interlocal agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute the amendment to the lease purchase option agreement. Councilman Sabatello commented the terms of the agreement had changed. Concern was expressed regarding the 50 -year term; however, it was reported that the County had indicated they would be willing to discuss that issue later. Councilman Clark made a motion to approve Resolution 28, 2000 with the amendments read into the record by the City Attorney. Vice Mayor Jablin seconded the motion that carried by unanimous 4 -0 vote. 06 3 0 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, 4/17/2000 Resolution 32, 2000 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, Providing for the Approval of an Application from Frenchman's Creek Golf Course for an Amendment of a Previously Approved Site Plan by Approving the 4,421 square foot Expansion of the Existing Clubhouse and the Addition of a 15,261 square foot Fitness and Tennis Center Located in the Center of the Frenchman's Creek Planned Community District (PCD) at the Southeast Corner of Alternate AlA and Donald Ross Road, as more Particularly Described herein; Providing for Conditions of Approval; Providing for a Waiver; and Providing for an Effective Date. Following comments by staff, a video presentation, and presentation on behalf of the petitioner by Donaldson Hearing, Councilman Clark made a motion to approve Resolution 32, 2000. Motion was seconded by Vice Chair Jablin and carried by unanimous 4 -0 vote. Mayor Russo thanked Frenchman's Creek for their donation of a van to the City. Resolution 35, 2000 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens,Florida; Authorizing the Issuance of a Promissory Note of the City in the Principal Amount of Not to Exceed $10,000,000 to finance Various Capital Expenditures of the City; Approving the Form of a Loan Agreement; Providing that such Note Shall Not be a General Obligation of the City but shall be Payable only from Certain Non -Ad Valorem Revenues and Other Monies as Provided Herein; Providing for the Rights, Securities and Remedies of the Owner of Such Note; Providing for the Creation of Certain Funds; Making certain Covenants and Agreements in Connection Therewith; and Providing an Effective Date. Finance Director Olson explained how the line of credit worked, and that initial borrowing of approximately $3 million would be used for Fire Station No. 3, a fire truck for Fire Station No. 3, and purchase of additional 33 acres for the District Park. Richard Orman made comments not in favor of the line of credit. Mike Martino was also not in favor of the line of credit. Discussion ensued regarding public perception of borrowing $10,000,000. Councilman Clark made a motion to approve Resolution 35, 2000 with the following amendments: To substitute the sum of $3,000,000 for $10,000,000 wherever it appeared including in the title and in all of the operant provisions and in the promissory note, and with the additional amendment at the appropriate point in the Resolution specifying that the $3,000,000 is to be used only for the three approved budgeted items of Fire Station No. 3, a fire truck for Station No. 3, and purchase of an additional 33 acres for the District Park. Vice Mayor Jablin seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 4 -0 vote. Awarding Bid for Bank Line of Credit - Councilman Clark made a motion to approve the award of the bid for the $3,000,000 loan to Republic Security Bank. Vice Mayor Jablin seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 4 -0 vote. Resolution 36, 2000 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, Authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to Execute an Air Stripper Discharge Agreement with Seacoast Utility Authority; and Providing for an Effective Date. Councilman Clark made a motion to approve Resolution 36, 2000. Vice Mayor Jablin seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 4 -0 vote. ORDINANCES: Ordinance 14, 2000 - Presented for Consideration of First Reading - An Ordinance of the City 0 v • CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, 4/17/2000 Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, Providing for the Approval of the Application of Palm Beach Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership for an Amendment of a Previously Approved Planned Unity Development located at the Southwest Corner of PGA Boulevard and Interstate Highway 95 as More Particularly Described Herein by Approving an Increase in Square Footage in the Phase 2 Office Building from 82,265 to 82,389 and a Reduction in Height from Ten Stories to Five Stories, and Allowing the Permitted Phase 2 Parking Structure to have an Optional Third Floor; Providing for Conditions of Approval; providing for waivers; Providing for Severability, Providing for Conflicts; and Providing for an Effective Date. Principal Planner Jim Norquest presented the request. Al Malefatto, agent, and Pete Spina, Oliver Glidden & Partners spoke on behalf of the applicant. Access to Tanglewood and traffic concerns was discussed. Frank Maroney, Architect, described proposed improvements. Traffic Engineer Joe Pollock clarified points regarding a deceleration lane not yet approved by FDOT that could alleviate stacking problems. Direction was to leave the existing access to Tanglewood but not to grant access from the parking garages. Councilman Clark made a motion to place Ordinance 14, 2000, on First Reading by title only. Vice Mayor Jablin seconded the motion, which carried by 3 -1 vote. The City Clerk read Ordinance 14, 2000 on First Reading by title only. \ o {{ ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: Modular News Racks - Code Enforcement Director Paul Friedman presented for consideration a concept of using modular news racks throughout the City to eliminate the unsightly appearance of numerous multicolored different sized racks in poor repair. Direction was to consult the Finance Director regarding placing this item in next year's budget. Policy Governing Public Use of City Meeting Facilities - Information Officer Beth Ingold Love reported an inter - departmental team had made the following recommendations: To make available the Police Department's Community Room for public use; to make available Parks & Recreation Community Centers at both Burns and Riverside for staff - attended or City- sponsored meetings only; to make available the Council Chambers for Council meetings or large City - sponsored training (no food or beverage to be served in this room), and to explore use of the Council Chambers for educational seminars. Staff would explore an agreement with local schools for space for use by the Seniors Program during summer months. The lobby was be used for holiday functions and Gardens Art receptions. Re -Order Agenda - Councilman Clark made a motion to re -order the agenda to move the City Attorney's Report to be next on the agenda. City Attorney Rosenthal advised that item (b) on the agenda under City Attorney's Report would be delayed to another meeting. Vice Mayor Jablin seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 4 -0 vote. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT: Petition for Contraction - Attorney Andrew Pineiro reviewed the petition for Contraction filed by Thomas J. Kessner and Shari L. Kessner, which was a request to de -annex the Vavrus tract, Cordani tract, and the municipal golf course, and explained that the City had undertaken a feasibility study of that contraction in accordance with State statute, and had determined that the petition should be rejected. Attorney Pineieo explained that the Kessners were neither owners or residents of the Cordani tract or the municipal golf course property, and therefore had no standing to include those parcels in their petition; and that de- annexing only the Vavrus property 0 01 5 0 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, 4/17/2000 would make the Cordani tract no longer contiguous to the City, which was against Florida statute. Thirdly, Florida statutes required that only properties not meeting the criteria for annexation may be de- annexed and the Vavrus tract did meet the annexation requirements. Richard Neill, Jr. attorney for Thomas J. and Shari L. Kessner and Charlie Vavrus, distributed handouts to the City Council to indicate that this matter warranted further study. Mr. Neill stated he had received information that this request had been denied. Councilman Clark made a motion to ratify staff recommendation to reject the Petition for Contraction filed by Thomas J. Kessner and Shari L. Kessner. Vice Mayor Jablin seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 4 -0 vote. ITEMS AND REPORTS BY MAYOR AND COUNCIL: Councilmember Sabatello - Councilmember Sabatello requested clarification regarding the Recreation Department design flaws presented earlier in the meeting, to which the City Manager responded that direction was to proceed with correction of the items and to come back with who was responsible, working with the Finance Director and the City Attorney. Councilmember Sabatello expressed safety concerns in Recreation and concern regarding unresolved items in the new complex, and explained that he wanted assurance of when things would be done. Mayor Russo requested of the City Manager for the next meeting a status report of who would be responsible for each item and when it would be done. The City Manager reported he had assigned Building Official Jack Hansen to coordinate all unfinished items and items for corrections. Councilmember Sabatello requested support from the other members of the City Council that they concurred with moving ahead to fix things, which they indicated. is Vice Mayor Jablin - The Vice -Mayor reported on progress with the sound and video system, and his support for Jack Hansen being in charge of coordination. Councilman Clark - Councilman Clark reported he was no longer affiliated with the company that took over from the former Equestrian Task Force, in case anyone else was interested in becoming a representative. Mayor Russo - Mayor Russo reported he had attended the Frenchman's Creek charity function, a CRA meeting attended by local banks and Mayors from surrounding cities, and the Chamber of Commerce Governmental Concerns meeting. Mayor Russo announced the Neighborhood meeting scheduled for the next night. Mayor Russo reported meeting with Commissioner Marcus and DOT regarding the Prosperity Farms and PGA Boulevard intersection. The Mayor cautioned everyone to be careful since things were happening so fast, and expressed appreciation for all of staff's work. Councilmember Sabatello - Councilmember Sabatello suggested writing a letter of appreciation to the Seniors, who would be leaving this year. Jack Hansen, Building Official, announced the podium would be re -built to accommodate the new electronic equipment. Mr. Hansen stated he intended to carry out corrections beginning with the City Council Chambers and then the other items inside and outside. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to discuss, upon motion by Vice Mayor Jablin, seconded by Councilman Clark, carried 4 -0, the meeting was adjourned at 11:02 p.m. APPROVAL: 0 MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO 0 CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, 4/17/2000 VICE MAYOR ERIC JABLIN CHAIRMAN PRO TEM CARL SABATELLO COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK COUNCILWOMAN LAUREN FURTADO ATTEST: Carol Gold, CMC Is City Clerk 1�1 no • CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORKSHOP MEETING APRIL 27, 2000 The April 27, 2000, Special Workshop Meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, was called to order at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex located at 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida; and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: The City Clerk called the roll and the following elected officials were in attendance: Mayor Joseph R. Russo, Vice Mayor Eric Jablin, Councilperson David Clark, Councilperson Lauren Furtado, and Councilperson Carl Sabatello. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: Proposed Land Development Regulations Dated March 5, 2000 Articles V - VIII - Growth Management Director Roxanne Manning explained that the proposed changes were intended to strengthen and clarify the existing code. Consultant Marty Hodgkins reviewed substantive changes. Page 184. Procedures for special events were clarified. Page 215. Provided an option of off -site mitigation for environmentally sensitive lands. Page 227. Increased the developer contribution for Art in Public Places. Page 236. A proposed change would permit wall signs near the top of a building. Councilman Clark expressed his opinion that this would be a major reversal of policy and favored not making this change. It was the consensus of the City Council not to change this language. Page 246. Changes were proposed so those political signage and free speech signs would follow recent Court rulings. Page 307. Provided for reduction of shared parking spaces with specific uses. Page 332. City Engineer Lindahl recommended recordation of plats before issuance of a building permit, with which the City Council agreed. Page 333. City Engineer Lindahl recommended recordation of boundary plats before issuance of a building permit, with which the City Council agreed. Page 377. Provided that easements within subdivisions be separate and not a part of any lot. Page 382. After the Fact Subdivisions: A boundary plat would be required for the perimeter of the property with appropriate unity of control, after which interior lots would be established by metes and bounds. Page 409: Provided City Council with the option to delay or eliminate the current code requirement that all uses existing as of August 18, 2000 cease, and allow them to continue. Mr. Hodgkins requested that discussion of adult uses be delayed until a recommendation had been received from the Planning & Zoning Commission. Growth Management Director is Manning reported the pattern book had been renamed and would be called a design manual -1 10" G(1 F 1 CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL WORKSHOP MEETING, 4/27/2000 2 and that a completed first draft would be presented to the City Council for review. City Attorney Leonard Rubin clarified that language would be added to the code providing that the City Council could deny a project that met traffic concurrency if there were traffic problems associated with a development site. Councilmember Furtado expressed concern that consistency had not been applied regarding stacking requirements, since some projects on internal roads had been required to have stacking while some projects on major roads had none. Mr. Hodgkins reported work was still in process regarding items discussed at the last meeting Henry Skokowski expressed appreciation that staff had worked very well with him regarding application procedures. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to discuss, upon motion by Councilperson Furtado, seconded by Councilperson Clark, carried 5 -0, the meeting was adjourned at 7:35 p.m. APPROVAL: MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO VICE MAYOR ERIC JABLIN CHAIRMAN PRO TEM CARL SABATELLO COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK COUNCILWOMAN LAUREN FURTADO ATTEST: Carol Gold, City Clerk • 0 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum 0 • Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: May 8, 2000 Purchase of Computers for new Emergency Operating Center. Subject /Agenda Item Staff recommends award of bid for the purchase of sixteen (16) Dell optiPlex GX -100 low profile computers to Dell Computers, Inc. by "piggy backing" off the GSA Contract in the amount of $14,688.00 and authority to execute an agreement for same. Recommendation/Motion: Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ 14,688 Council Action: City Attorney Fire - Rescue Total [ ] Approved Finance $ 50,000 [ ] Approved w/ Current FY conditions ACM [ ] Denied Human Res. Advertised: N/A Other Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Date: [ ] Operating Attachments: Paper: [ X ] Other: State Grant Attached Staff Report Submitted b [ X ] Not Required De rtmen 4-fead Affected parties [ ] Notified Budget Acct. #:: 01 -1200- 522.5210 [ ] None Approved by: City Manager [ X ] Not required BACKGROUND: See attached Staff Report. l,' 0 J • • • CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM �h- x t TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: May 8, 2000 APPROVED: Nabar Enrique Martinez, City Managerp`/$ FROM: Peter T. Bergel, Fire Chie SUBJECT: Purchase of Computer Equipment for Emergency Operating Center. Background In November 1998 the City, through Griffin Grantwriting and Consulting prepared and submitted a grant to fund the construction of the new Emergency Operating Center in the renovated Fire Station. Unfortunately, this grant request did not score high enough at the State level and as a result was not funded. Again, in November 1999 the City through Griffin Grantwriting and Consulting prepared and submitted a grant to fund the software and associated equipment for the new Emergency Operating Center in the renovated Fire Station. The grant was awarded to the City in January 2000 in the amount of fifty thousand (50,000) dollars. Discussion Staff has researched recent bids awarded and determined that the enclosed bid is the most recent GSA pricing. This particular equipment is almost identical with the exception of the monitor of the equipment located in the Palm Beach County Emergency Operating Center. The bid price for this equipment is $ 14,688.00. The grant requires that this specific software be purchased as requested in the grant proposal submitted by the City. Once the hardware is purchased the City will be reimbursed for the purchase. This purchase would be made out of Account # 01- 1200 - 522.5210 and the funding source will be a grant. Recommendation Staff recommends award of bid for the purchase of sixteen (16) Dell optiPlex GX -100 low profile computers to Dell Computers, Inc. by "piggy backing" off the GSA Contract in the amount of $14,688.00 and authority to execute an agreement for same. enc. cc: file C�`? State & Local Government E Deals: Customizing Your System Page 1 ot'2 1 -800- 416 -3355 Current Orderform I Retrieve E -Qu {ill I p State & Local Governmen sP Dell OptiPlex GX100 Low - Profile Desktop Dependable performance for the value conscious is exactly what the GX100 delivers! GX100 follows through by offering I Chipset with 4MB display cache. The 810 chipset employs Intel's integrated 3D Graphics with Direct AGP for vivid 2D and and images. The 810 Chipset also offers Dynamic Video Memory Technology (DVMT) which allocates a portion of system ` enhance graphics and video operations, and enables equivalent performance of 8MB video memory. GX100 also delivers Intel Celeron Processors and includes an integrated 3COM NIC, ATA/66 EIDE Controller for hard drives, and options for enhancements. Best of all, the GX100 is designed to work within your budget. Optiplex GX100 500 MHz Celeron To configure your system: 1. Select from the options listed to configure YOUR Dell system. 2. Click "Update Price" button at the bottom of the page to make the pricing reflect any changes you have made. 3. Click "Add to Orderforrn" button at the bottom of the page to add your system to your Order Form, Custom Views: C drop -down list view r view all system options % Detail View (read only Price *: $918 36 Month Business Lease * *: $35 ursday, April 27, 2000 8:34:08 PM CST RC964783 �IeronT[m 500MHz Processor, 128K Cache ,X1L - [220 -3253] MB (1 DIMM) d - [311 -2532] lietkev (SDacesaver) QK - [310 -3552] 17" (16.0" viewable, .27dp) Dell M770 M770 - [320 -0360] Integrated Intel 3D graphics with Direct AGP and 4MB Display Ca NTVID - [320 -3920] 3.4GB EIDE Hard Drive (5400 RPM) 34 - [340 -6140] 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive 3 -1340-61381 Nindows 2000 Workstation with CD using FAT32 N2KEC -1420- 1796][422 -4019] Microsoft IntelliMouse (wheelmouse) for Windows 9X and Window M - [310 -3556] ntegrated 3Com Etherlink 10/100 with ACPI and Remote Wake -u NTNIC - [430-30611 20/48X IDE CD -ROM �1348 - [313 -0614] xpansion Riser (3 PC[ slots) 2PCI - [430 -0200] 3 Yr Next Business Day On -Site Parts & Labor,IGS 30S -1902- 3612][902 -4610] Vo Installation Option JOINSTL - [900 -9987] Vlouse Pad APAD - [310 -3559] thank you for purchasing a Dell OptiPlex! 3LG - [460 -8735] Dell E Deals 'ROMO - [460 -4565] 36 Month Business Lease * *: $35 Add to Orderform http: / /rco mmerce. us. del l.com/rcomm /config.asp ?o rder_ code= rcRC964783 -25 759 4/27/00 Catalog Number: OptiPlex GX100 Low - Profile Desktop: Memory (Non -ECC SDRAM): Keyboard: Monitor: ideo Card Upgrade: Hard Drive: Floppy Drive: Operating System: Mouse: Network Card: Removable Media Options: Riser: Standard and Business Critical Services: Installation Services: Mouse Pad: OptiPlex Tracking: dditional Software & Accessories: Price *: $918 ursday, April 27, 2000 8:34:08 PM CST RC964783 �IeronT[m 500MHz Processor, 128K Cache ,X1L - [220 -3253] MB (1 DIMM) d - [311 -2532] lietkev (SDacesaver) QK - [310 -3552] 17" (16.0" viewable, .27dp) Dell M770 M770 - [320 -0360] Integrated Intel 3D graphics with Direct AGP and 4MB Display Ca NTVID - [320 -3920] 3.4GB EIDE Hard Drive (5400 RPM) 34 - [340 -6140] 1.44MB 3.5" Floppy Drive 3 -1340-61381 Nindows 2000 Workstation with CD using FAT32 N2KEC -1420- 1796][422 -4019] Microsoft IntelliMouse (wheelmouse) for Windows 9X and Window M - [310 -3556] ntegrated 3Com Etherlink 10/100 with ACPI and Remote Wake -u NTNIC - [430-30611 20/48X IDE CD -ROM �1348 - [313 -0614] xpansion Riser (3 PC[ slots) 2PCI - [430 -0200] 3 Yr Next Business Day On -Site Parts & Labor,IGS 30S -1902- 3612][902 -4610] Vo Installation Option JOINSTL - [900 -9987] Vlouse Pad APAD - [310 -3559] thank you for purchasing a Dell OptiPlex! 3LG - [460 -8735] Dell E Deals 'ROMO - [460 -4565] 36 Month Business Lease * *: $35 Add to Orderform http: / /rco mmerce. us. del l.com/rcomm /config.asp ?o rder_ code= rcRC964783 -25 759 4/27/00 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL 0 Agenda Cover Memorandum lr� u • Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: May 8, 2000 Purchase of Emergency Management Software for new Emergency Operating Center. Subject /Agenda Item Staff recommends award of bid for the purchase of EM/2000 software to Specialized Disaster Systems International, Inc. by "piggy backing" off the State and County in the amount of $27,680.00 and authority to execute an agreement for same. Recommendation/Motion: Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: S 27,680 Council Action: City Attorney Fire - Rescue Total [ ] Approved Finance 50,000 [ j Approved w/ - -'� Current FY conditions ACM [ ] Denied Human Res. Advertised: N/A Other Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Date: [ ] Operating Attachments: Paper: [ X ] Other: State Grant Attached Staff Report Submitted b [ X ] Not Required Departme ead Affected parties [ ] Notified Budget Acct. #:: 01- 1200 - 522.5210 [ ] None Approved by: City Manager [ X ] Not required BACKGROUND: See attached Staff Report. 0 • CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM �Ytt TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: May 8, 2000 APPROVED: Nabar Enrique Martinez, City Manager,0- FROM: Peter T. Bergel, Fire Chie SUBJECT: Purchase of Emergency Management Software. Background In November 1998 the City, through Griffin Grantwriting and Consulting prepared and submitted a grant to fund the construction of the new Emergency Operating Center in the renovated Fire Station. Unfortunately, this grant request did not score high enough at the State level and as a result was not funded. Again, in November 1999 the City through Griffin Grantwriting and Consulting prepared and submitted a grant to fund the software and associated equipment for the new Emergency Operating Center in the renovated Fire Station. The grant was awarded to the City in January 2000 in the amount of fifty thousand (50,000) dollars. Discussion Staff has researched recent bids awarded and determined that the enclosed bid is a piggyback off of the State and County purchases. This particular bid is the identical emergency management software utilized by several municipalities, Palm Beach County and the State Division of Emergency Management. The bid price for this software is $ 27,680.00. The grant requires that this specific software be purchased as requested in the grant proposal submitted by the City. Once the software and hardware is purchased the City will be reimbursed for the purchase. This purchase would be made out of Account # 01- 1200 - 522.5210 and the funding source will be a grant. Recommendation Staff recommends award of bid for the purchase of EM/2000 software to Specialized Disaster Systems International, Inc. by "piggy backing" off the State and County Bid in the amount of $27,680.00 and authority to execute an agreement for same. enc. cc: file 0 04_<� • • • Apik -06 -00 13:32 S.O -S. Inc_ Specialized Disaster Systems International, Inc. System Integrators To the Emergency Mauagrm -nt Industry April 6, 2000 Mr. Pete Bergel Palm Beach Gardens Fire & Rescue 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 PROPOSAL 225 774 2621 P.01 2140 $ignell Dain Blvd- Suitt: 302•B Iakc (_Yuri. N40 65049 . 57 31365- 7373 • Fix: 5731365 -2163 • Email: sine @lakeorark.nct SUS EM/200OTM EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE Configuration — SDS EM12000t' Server License and 17 Workstations ITEM: SOFTWARE* 1 ea. SDS EM/2000TM Lan Server License Package 7,000.00 Includes: 1 LAN Server License I Workstation License with development. tools 2 Workstation Licenses without development tools 1 Systems Administration Manual 3 EM/2000TM Getting Started Guides 1.4 ea. SDS EMI_9000TM Workstation Licenses without development tools t S 500.00 per licem-)e, 11,,300.00 SUB -TOTAL SOFTWARE $ 18,200.00 Less 10% SNAPS Discount 1,820.00 TOTAL SOFTWARE $16,380.00 INSTALLATION AND TRAINING I On -site installation and configuration 01,000.00 per day (est_ 3 days) $ 3,000.0n, 1. On -site SDS EAf/2000T'4Applicaiionc Administratior. Training $2,000 ea. Eight (8) hours of hauids -on wining for up to 3 students. 2,000.00 1 On -site SDS EtV211Wm User Training Tx%vJve (12) hours of training over two (2) days for up to eight (8) students 2,500,00 SUB -TOTAL INSTALLA.TtON AND TRAINING 8 7,500.00 Less 10% SNAPS Discount 750.00 TOTAL INSTALLATION AND TRAINING 5 6,750.00 Note: All trainers' travel and related expenses are pre -paid and billed to the client for prompt reimbursemen I l.0L'3 • [7 Ap.- -06 -00 13:33 S.D -S. Inc. 225 774 2621 P.02 ANNUAL SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE, 25% of the EM12000rM Software List Price $ 4,550.00 Includes telephone support seven days per week, 24 hours per day, 865 days per year. Includes all SDS, Inc. E11L OOOTm enhancements at no additional charge. TOTAL, MAINTENANCE $ 4,650.00 TOTAL PROPOSAL $ 27,£80.00 `'Shipping and Handling Costa of ENIl2000TH software and materials will be billed separately to the customer with supporting documentation. TERMS: Net Upon Receipt PRICES AU VALID FOR 00 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS PROPOSAL, APPROVED BY: TITLE: DATE: OUR MOST VALUED ASSET —A SATISFIED CUSTOMER III 0 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum • Date: May 5, 2000 Subject/Agenda Item: Awarding of bid for Plat 4 — Phase I: North and South Banyan Street Drainage Retrofit Recommendation /Motion: Consider motion to award contract to D.S. Eakins Construction Corporation per piggy -back on contract number 99- 1201CB, Palm Beach County Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Costs: $94,150.00 Council Action: Total City Attorney [ ] Approved Finance KR0 $ 200,000 [ ] Approved wcorditio.s ACM Current FY [ ] Denied Human Res. Other Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Advertised: NA Attachments: Date: [ ] Operating Paper: [ x ] Not Required 'Other S l fi X Submitted by: �� Bob Patty Affected parties [ ] Notified Budget Acct #:: /&- 3WO --5-34 ' [ ] None Approved by: [ x ] Not required BACKGROUND: The Plat 4 drainage system was designed in the early 1960s. Storms in '95 and '99 highlighted the need for drainage improvements. Discussions with the Plat 4 neighborhood last fall included a schedule for implementation of improvements. This work is consistent with that schedule. DISCUSSION: A drainage retrofit for Plat 4 has been designed consistent with the City's standards for level of service to the residents, which includes providing water quality benefit. The system has been designed to decrease the amount of standing water in the streets, improve flow to the inlets, and add additional storage. Due to funding issues, the retrofit of Plat 4 will be broken down into phases, with the 002141 . first phase consisting of Banyan Street. Phase I construction proposes to provide drainage improvements on the north end of Banyan Street, and partial improvements on the south end of Banyan Street. Funding is available for phase I IN Gas tax Account # 16- 3000 - 539.5265. 0 • Attached are estimated construction costs for the proposed Phase I, prepared by D.S. Eakins Construction Corporation. This construction quotation /contract from D.S. Eakins is based on a contract D.S. Eakins has with Palm Beach County. We are piggy- backing on Palm Beach County's contact number 99- 120/CB, awarded to D.S. Eakins Construction Corporation. RECOMMENDATION: Award contract to D.S. Eakins Construction Corporation per piggy -back on contract number 99- 120/CB, Palm Beach County in the amount of $94,150.00. • • • CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM TO: Beth Ingold -Love, Assistant to City Manager DATE: May 8, 2000 FROM: Bob Patty, Director/Public Works �10 SUBJECT: Phase I Drainage Improvements Plat 4 (Garden Woods) Attached is the Council Agenda Memorandum and justification for Plat 4 Drainage Improvements, Phase I. Funding for this phase of improvements is available in Gas Tax Account #16- 3000 - 539.5265. The Public Works Department and the City Engineers are currently working on possible funding from FEMA to complete the remainder of the drainage improvements in Plat 4, Garden Woods. The FEMA Grant Application, if approved, will cover approximately 80% of the needed funding for this project in next year's budget. If you have any questions or concerns, I will make myself available the the next council meeting. Cc: Nabar Martinez, City Manager Dan Clark, City Engineer File qty` =O F • A � °tip 'tic ` °GO • • PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 24, 2000 SUBJECT /AGENDA ITEM Consideration of Approval: Resolution 37, 2000, a request to approve a Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Resolution 37, 2000. Reviewed by: ' _ ) Originating Dept.: Costs: $ Total Council Action: City Attorn L� Growth Management [ ] Approved Finance NA $ [ ] Approved w/ ACM Current FY conditions Human Res. NA [ ] Denied Other NA Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Advertised: Attachments: Date: [ ] Operating OS-07-00 r% -Od per: [X] Not Required [ ]Other • Resolution 37, 2000 w/ exhibit Submitted Growth M a agement I Affected parties Budget Acct. #:: Director [ ] Notified [ ] None Approved by: City Manager [X] Not required REQUEST The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) is requesting our participation in the future landscape maintenance of the PGA Boulevard intersection with State Road 811 (Alt. A1A), also known as the PGA Boulevard Flyover. This is a typical FDOT agreement for landscape maintenance. City staff has received the ninety percent (90 %) complete landscape and irrigation plans from FDOT for the beautification of the PGA Boulevard Flyover. Upon execution of this agreement, funds will be set as side for landscaping and irrigation this project. RESOLUTION 37, 2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE BEAUTIFICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE INTERSECTION OF PGA BOULEVARD AND STATE ROAD 811; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to beautify and improve the highway right -of -way at PGA Boulevard and State Road 811 through the installation of landscaping; and WHEREAS, the Florida Department of Transportation will provide funding to install the landscaping provided that the City agrees to the maintenance of landscaping along the public right -of -way. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the District Four Highway Beautification and Maintenance Memorandum of Agreement for State Project 930001, PGA Boulevard and State Road 811, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A." Section 2. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. RESOLVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF MAY, 2000. MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO ATTESTED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR JABLIN COUNCILMAN SABATELLO COUNCILWOMAN FURTADO COUNCILMAN CLARK • PACPWin\ HIST0RY \000417A \43F.1D \stm(1501.000) Exhibit "A" DISTRICT FOUR (4) HIGHWAY BEAUTIFICATION and MAINTENANCE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT DSF- MAINTENANCE THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 19, , by and between the STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, a component agency of the State of Florida, hereinafter called the "DEPARTMENT" and the CITY of PALM BEACH GARDENS, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, existing under the Laws of Florida, hereinafter called the "AGENCY ". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS,as part of the continual updating of the State of Florida Highway System, the Department, for the purpose of safety, protection of the investment and other reasons, has constructed and does maintain a six (6) lane highway facility as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, within the corporate limits of the AGENCY; and WHEREAS, the AGENCY is of the opinion that said highway facilities that contain landscape medians and areas outside the travel way to the right of way line, excluding sidewalk, shall be maintained by periodic trimming, cutting, mowing, fertilizing, litter pick -up and necessary replanting; and WHEREAS,the parties hereto mutually recognize the need for entering into an Agreement designating and setting forth the responsibilities of each party; and WHEREAS, the AGENCY by Resolution No. dated , 1 9 , attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, desires to enter into this Agreement and authorizes its officers to do so; NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual benefits to flow each to the other, the parties covenant and agree as follows: 1. The DEPARTMENT hereby agrees to install or cause to be installed landscaping on the highway facilities as specified in plans and specifications hereinafter referred to as the Project; and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B" 2. The AGENCY, agrees to maintain the landscaping within the medians and areas outside the travel way to the right of way line, excluding sidewalk, by periodic trimming, cutting, mowing, fertilizing, litter pickup and necessary replanting, following the Department's landscape safety and plant care guidelines. The AGENCY's responsibility for maintenance shall include all landscape /turfedareas and areas covered with interlocking pavers or similar type surfacing (hardscape) within the median and areas outside the travel way to the right of way line, excluding sidewalk, on Department of Transportation right -of- wa)Cv"iF)the . limits of the Project. Such maintenance to be provided by the AGENCY is specifically set out as follows: To maintain, which means the proper watering and fertilization of all plants and keeping them as free as practicable from disease and harmful 'insects; to properly mulch the plant beds; to keep the premises free of weeds; to mow and/or cut the grass to a proper length; to properly prune all plants which includes (1) removing dead or diseased parts of plants, or (2) pruning such parts thereof which present a visual hazard for those using the roadway. To maintain also means removing or replacing dead or diseased plants in their entirety, or removing or replacing those that fall below original project standards. All plants removed for whatever reason shall be replaced by plants of the same size and grade as specified in the original plans and specifications. To maintain also means to keep the hardscape areas free from weeds and replacement of any areas becoming in disrepair so as to cause a safety hazard. To maintain also means to keep litter removed from the median and areas outside the travel way of the right of way line. Plants shall be those items which would be scientifically classified as plants and include but are not limited to trees, grass, or shrubs. The above named functions to be performed by the AGENCY, shall be subject to periodic inspections by the Department. Such inspection findings will be shared with the AGENCY and shall be the basis of all decisions regarding, repayment, reworking or agreement termination. The AGENCY shall not change or deviate from said plans without written approval of the Department. 3. If at any time after the AGENCY has assumed the landscaping installation and/or maintenance responsibility above - mentioned, it shall come to the attention of the Department's District Secretary that the limits or a part thereof is not properly maintained pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, said District Secretary may at his option issue a written notice that a deficiency or deficiencies exist(s), by sending a certified letter to the of AGENCY, to place said AGENCY on notice thereof. Thereafter the AGENCY shall have a period of thirty (30) calendar days within which to correct the cited deficiencies. If said deficiencies are not corrected within this time period, the Department may at its option, proceed as follows: (a) Maintain the landscaping or a part thereof, with Department or contractor's personnel and invoice the AGENCY for expenses incurred, or (b) Terminate the Agreement in accordance with Paragraph 6 of this Agreement and remove, by Department or contractor's personnel, all of the landscaping installed under this Agreement or any preceding agreements except as to trees and palms and charge the AGENCY the reasonable cost of such removal. 4. It is understood between the parties hereto that the landscaping covered by this Agreement may be removed, relocated or adjusted at any time in the future as determined to be • necessary by the Department in order that the adjacent state road be widened, altered or 2 0 3b • otherwise changed to meet with future criteria or planning of the Department. The AGENCY shall be given sixty (60) calendar days notice to remove said landscaping after which time the Department may remove same. 5. The Department agrees to enter into a contract for the installation of landscape project for an amount not to exceed $ 1,200,000 as defined in Attachment "C ". The Department's participationin the project cost, as described in Attachment "C" is limited to only those items which are directly related to this project. The agencies landscape architect or designee shall assist the Department in final inspection and provide written acceptance of the Project. 6. The AGENCY agrees to reimburse the Department all monies expended for the project, should the landscaped area fail to be maintained in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 7. This Agreement may be terminated under any one of the following conditions: (a) By the Department, if the AGENCY fails to perform its duties under Paragraph 3, following ten (10) days written notice. (b) By the Department, for refusal by the AGENCY to allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by the AGENCY in conjunction with this Agreement. 8. The term of this Agreement commences upon execution. 9. To the extent permitted by law, the AGENCY shall indemnify and hold harmless the Department, its officers and employees from all suits, actions, claims and liability arising out of the AGENCY's negligent performance of the work under this agreement, or due to the failure of the AGENCY to maintain the Project in conformance with the standards described in Section 2 of this Agreement. 10. The AGENCY may construct additional landscaping within the limits of the rights -of -ways identified as a result of this document, subject to the following conditions: A. Plans for any new landscaping shall be subject to approval by the Department. The AGENCY shall not change or deviate from said plans without written approval by the Department. B.All landscaping shall be developed and implemented in accordance with the current Florida of Department of Transportation Roadway and Traffic Design Standard index 546, 3 6� • C. Clear zone/horizontal clearance as specified in the Plans Preparation Manual- Metric Volume 1, Chapter 2 must be adhered to as outlined on relevant sheets Exhibit D, D. Landscaping shall not obstruct roadside signs or permitted outdoor advertising signs, E. If irrigation is to be installed, the Department shall be provided accurate as built plans of the system so if in the future there is a need for the Department to preform work in the area, the system can be accommodated as much as possible, F. If it becomes necessary to provide utilities to the median or side areas (water /electricity) it shall be the AGENCY'S responsibility to obtain a permit for such work through the local maintenance office, G. During the installation of the project and future maintenance operations, maintenance of traffic shall be in accordance with the current edition of the MUTCD and the current Department Roadway and Traffic Design Standards (series 600), H. The AGENCY shall provide the local maintenance office located at , a twenty -four (24) hour access telephone number and the name of a responsible person that the Department may contact, I. If there is a need to restrict the normal flow of traffic it shall be done on off peak hours (9AM to 3PM) J. The AGENCY shall be responsible to clear all utilities including the signal system communication cable with in the project limits, K. The AGENCY shall notify the local maintenance office forty-eight (48) hours prior to the start of the project, L. The AGENCY agrees to comply with the requirements of this Agreement with regard to any additional landscaping installed; M. No change will be made in the payment terms established under item number five (5) of this Agreement due to any increase in cost to the Department resulting from the installation of landscaping added under this item. _ 11. This writing embodies the entire agreement and understanding between the parties hereto and there are no other agreements and understanding, oral or written, with reference to the subject matter hereof that are not merged herein and superseded hereby. 12. The Department, during any fiscal year, shall not expend money, incur and liability, or enter into any contract which, by its terms, involves the expenditure of money in excess of the amounts budgeted as available for expenditure during such fiscal year. Any contract, verbal or written, made in violation of this subsection is null and void, and no money may be paid on such contract. The Department shall require a statement from the Comptroller of the Department that funds are available prior to entering into any such contract or other binding commitment of funds. Nothing herein contained shall prevent the making of contracts for periods exceeding 1 year, but any contract so made shall be executory only for the value of the services to be rendered or agreed to be paid for in succeeding fiscal years; and this 4 paragraph shall be incorporated verbatim in all contracts of the Department which are for an amount in excess of $25,000.00 and which have a term for a period of more than 1 year. 13. The Department's District Secretary shall decide all questions, difficulties and disputes of any nature whatsoever that may arise under or by reason of this Agreement, the prosecution or fulfillment of the service hereunder and the character, quality, amount and value thereof, and his decision upon all claims, questions and disputes shall be final and conclusive upon the parties hereto. 14. This Agreement may not be assigned or transferred by the AGENCY in whole or part without the consent of the Department. 15. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. In the event of a conflict between any portion of the contract and Florida law, the laws of Florida shall prevail. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed the day and year first above written. AGENCY Chairperson Attest: (SEAL) Clerk Approval as to Form • Date STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION .21 District Secretary Attest: (SEAL) Executive Secretary Approval as to Form 5 Date • • .7 EXHIBIT "A" PROJECT LOCATION SECTION NO.93001 FIN NO.(s): 2297715201 COUNTY: Palm Beach S.R. NO.: 786/811 PGA Boulevard from Station 100 + 75 (west of 1 -95) east to Station 118 + 50 (east of Farichild Gardens Avenue) and S. R. 811 from Station 443 + 20 ( north of RCA Drive) to Station 456 + 25 ( Gardens Boulevard) 0 • SECTION NO.: FIN NO: COUNTY: S.R. NO.: EXHIBIT "B" 93001 _22977115201 Palm Beach 786/811 The Department agrees to install the Project with a contractor in accordance with the plans and specifications attached hereto and incorporated herein. Please see attached plans. �J • 7 035— SECTION NO.:93001 FIN NO: 22977115201 COUNTY: Palm Beach S.R. NO.: 786/811 ATTACHMENT "C" (GENERAL) PROJECT COST This Exhibit forms an integral part of the Highway Beautification Grant Agreement between the State of Florida, Department of Transportation and the AGENCY. Dated Landscaping and irrigation I. PROJECT COST: $1,200,000 • CAW PDOC"M[NMDSF.MA[(,m7 /6/95) 8 0 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum • Date: Meeting Date: May 18, 2000_ Subject/Agenda Item Professional Centre at the Gardens Plat (a.k.a. Gertz Office Building) Recommendation /Motion: There are no Engineering concerns with this plat therefore approval is recommended. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ 0 Council Action: Growth Management (Total) City Attorney Finance [ ] Approved $ 0 [ ] Approved w/ Finance Current FY conditions [ ] Denied ACM Advertised: Funding Source: ( ] Continued to: Other Date: [ ] Operating Attachments: a Paper: [ X ] Not Required ( ] Other Memorandum Submitted by: 5�a nonahue, P.E. Department Director Affected parties [ ] Notified Budget Acct. #: [ )None Approved by: City Manager [ X ] Not required BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. o3 l INC. (UNSULIING CIVIL ENGINEERS, MEMORANDUM SURVEYORS & MAPPERS TO: Carol Gold FROM: Sean C. Donahue, P.E. DATE: May 8, 2000 FILE NO. 98 -4016 CIVIL AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES SUBJECT: Professional Centre at the Gardens WATER & WASTEWATER A.K.A. Gertz Office Building) TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING & MAPPING GIS Attached please find a copy of the plat for the referenced project on Mylar prepared by Lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc. received on May 4, 2000. Also attached are three paper copies of identifying portions of the plat. We have reviewed this plat for technical compliance with Chapter 177 of the Florida Statues and the City of Palm Beach Gardens requirements: We have no engineering concerns with this plat and therefore recommend its approval. is SCD/ cc: Roxanne Manning Jack Hanson Bahareh Keshavarz Ed Tombari Rob McSorley- Lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc. "Partners For Results P:\PR01ECTS\PBGMEM014016\4016v Value by Design" >it1 S.A1 COipoimc Pkwy. P.tlm City, 1 1- .34900 1501 I 280-388 1 I .iv (-)011 -180-)925 • • C7 w H -qt� W H W U �I 0 Cf) M W N OZ ZW Q � I Q 0 a N W N m as � T a Z ILL J. .00 a O }cc - Q F,. } 0 V LL QI-Z Ono N U ZEN..= °Ma U n m co W LL O Z V Q N ZZCL W UJI } ...1 W N Z J Z LL _ O� W Q Q ILW Q U) -:c 0- a <0 W S Q LLI cn m a S v N Q J � F' Z N O w F= V a W N J � r� o d 0 �� M OD ti .r O in 0 CD I- n cl2 /I / I c / IT \ IA O >A V I- I I �ifl .S r���g LAi 3 to � I I I I I I I I i i I I I I I I I I I I I i III I i I i I I i I I � III I I i I 1 I I I I I jI ll I I I I I I 1 I jI ll N I I , I I i �i I I � I I I I I III I I I I I , I I Iii I I I , I , I , I,I I , I , I , I I 1 � I,I I , I , I , I � I � a� I .i IQ I i I IiO I II I I I I I I I I I I �I I I 3 � I III J J D37 h m � a h J N n �o m �- � vN � III I i I i I I i I I � III I I i I 1 I I I I I jI ll I I I I I I 1 I jI ll N I I , I I i �i I I � I I I I I III I I I I I , I I Iii I I I , I , I , I,I I , I , I , I I 1 � I,I I , I , I , I � I � a� I .i IQ I i I IiO I II I I I I I I I I I I �I I I 3 � I III J J D37 • • • a �U Oa UW Nm 0) Q T N IL Z4-a oc o a O tp U L- Qf-Z LL M 1000 (0) N Z f. _ 0 O j w Uj.j m Za- O -UQ M L& go W uj J � Z Z F- V J Z LL = OF- -j 3 W as aw a O \ 0 w (f) (f) w° H -JO O f 4D • • w x W H W =2 O �A" Cf) cn co W N (g Z ZW a° ac °C a �U O N a W N m V aJ =a CL Z LL a 3o°- O } cc PF..J mZ5LL 4c "- Z LL M mOV N Z�-= P?Q V j W W m Zaa —U ZZa J W a~ Z— LL i Of" J W as aW a O ga ag £ a ZS P-4 �0- w Qa AO a 4.2 iv XX yytt } C3 w W �, ~pQQ. A Q Ld 1 W a r H a�! �aI��rnaa W `� bb U a cam -p�'�oj� a �i 1~ilU�gBQ W, LL O r W W Z co � �oJ 1- �1 Q Z wV W 3 N rt L w O O N OU nNC� w W W O a=a�w _ U U 6 0 mY -3% ` =a= O U U1NJ° F(nN/ -fir F}- W U(/IZZ U�J�iW U ova °a{�..�� � i44�1l'aw�F�LZ1�11 ~ m U= 0 2 °�• UOa W^ W g = OQ]a. V<l 1.Ul U pp�" NgO W Q� N O V-. °=° VV ° �QUW a <a< R a> 3 V ¢�Wow O E-4 UFU1�SFN �m \ 41 I.��ZWW Clt W 1 oz w O (� = a 6�ZI- J \ Z d�NO r�p x go1oF-ffi?d ? 1.. as QZ ~a °Q KYZF4f0 O ` W Z N 1+1 ZNO_w z 80 <UZ� N. d 7 H►�1 f= NOf= -2 09 W CZ-W 1p US< <p � V= OU 4 -WW z Z n UWZ= f (O =Y - NO < rnO�a n Wp Np=WU W Z lw� iO 1=O-wWO p p w O .n c < W�WKIWi�3 �vKvffNaJ2�ZWat -ZZJWZW ZT nWO �L� ~ p��n =��<DOwo�U1-O�cW.�SmF���OHWi � bWWpN.1- FWWUZJ�OVI >:o4�WJa FZ QYO�Op1F JO�CJ � VIrZ7O7- 04���J -- <6v"- y� n�ghZ��M WZZ� <(�Qt/iZ . RESOLUTION 43, 2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE PROFESSIONAL CENTRE AT THE GARDENS PLAT (A.K.A. GERTZ OFFICE BUILDING); AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Engineer has reviewed the Professional Centre at the Gardens Plat; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has determined that the proposed plat meets all the technical requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations and Chapter 177, F.S. and recommends the approval of the plat; and WHEREAS, the Plat is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and LDRs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby directed and authorized to execute the Mylar of the Professional Centre at the Gardens Plat, consisting of two (3) sheets dated April, 2000, prepared by Lawson, Noble and Webb, Inc. Engineers Planners Surveyors, attached hereto as Exhibit "A ". SECTION 2. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF Joseph R. Russo, Mayor ATTEST: Carol Gold, CMC, City Clerk VOTE: Mayor Russo Vice Mayor Jablin . Councilwoman Furtado Councilman Clark Councilman Sabatello APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY. City Attorney AYE NAY ABSENT RESOLUTION 44, 2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, DESIGNATING MAY 21sT —27 TH 2000 AS FIGHT FRAUD WEEK; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, WHEREAS, financial fraud and abuse cost both organizations and citizens of the United States of America more than $660 billion each year, and perpetrators of fraud successfully receive money from victims nearly sixty percent of the time; and WHEREAS, more than half of America's citizens have experienced financial fraud, and any citizen may become the victim of fraud, even when least expected, since perpetrators may be friends, family members, co- workers, well - dressed executives, or street criminals; and WHEREAS, fraudulent behavior knows no bounds and has no respect for its victims in terms of age, race, income level, education, or gender; and WHEREAS, law enforcement officials now label financial fraud as a growth industry because of the increasing caseload; and WHEREAS, over 45,000 Floridians sought help from state agencies for possible financial fraud last fiscal year; and WHEREAS, consumer awareness is considered one of the best defenses against financial fraud; and WHEREAS, a strong need exists to bring attention to this increasing problem in the State of Florida so citizens may work in tandem with state authorities, such as the Department of Banking and Finance, Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Department of Insurance, Office of the Attorney General, Office of Statewide Prosecution, and with other law enforcement officials to impede the progress of financial fraud; and WHEREAS, due to the increasing elder population, the State of Florida is committed to support programs like TRIAD, where law enforcement and seniors work together to reduce crime and fraud against the elderly; and WHEREAS, the Strike Force Against Fraudulent Enterprises (SAFE) initiative strives to develop effective prosecution strategies to combat financial fraud and has established lines of communication among agencies by sharing specialized resources and technology including future designs for a State Call Center with one toll -free number for consumers to report fraud. • NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens do hereby declare the week of May 21 -27, 2000 as FIGHT FRAUD IN FLORIDA WEEK And urge all citizens to take heed and be on their guard against those who would commit this crime in our community. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF ATTEST: Carol Gold, CMC, City Clerk VOTE: Mayor Russo Vice Mayor Jablin Councilwoman Furtado Councilman Clark Councilman Sabatello Joseph R. Russo, Mayor APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY. City Attorney AYE NAY ABSENT TO: THRU: APPROVED: FROM: CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM The Mayor and City Council Nabar Enrique Martinez, City Manager Len Lindahl City Engine SUBJECT: Golf Digest DATE: May 16, 2000 additional language. My review of the staff report revealed that the following comment did not get incorporated into the "concerns/issues" portion of the text: With regard to the water management system, Hood Road wellfield will have an impact on the project's lakes, particularly those lakes located in the east basin. The proposed control elevation for lakes in the east basin is 16.8 feet NGVD. Based on a 10 year period of modeling results for the initial conditions of development, lake elevations will be lower than the 16.8 feet NGVD approximately 70% of the time, below 14.8 feet NGVD (2 feet lower than control) approximately 35% of the time and below 13.8 feet NGVD (3 feet lower than control) approximately 18% of the time. The duration of these lower elevations can be months long. If a planned water use permit is obtained for the project and pump stations installed to recharge the lakes, the duration of lower elevations will improve. Other basin improvements in the Loxahatchee Slough could also result in improved stability of lake elevations. The fluctuation in lake elevations are disclosed so that Council will be aware of the potential for future residents in the project becoming upset when these lower elevations are experienced. GAShort Range \gdlenlet5l6.doc lei UA " 't" eon opt bo ' � P CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: May 17, 2000 APPROVED: Nabar Enrique Martinez, City Manager� FROM: Roxanne M. Manning, Growth Management Director SUBJECT: Golf Digest As you know, this project has been placed on the May 18, 2000 City Council agenda for second reading and adoption. Golf Digest has a long and complex review history and an enormous amount of work has gone into the project. Both staff and the petitioner are working hard to keep the project moving through the process. As recently as yesterday, negotiations continued on a few _ important points between the petitioner and the City. Fortunately, all issues have now been resolved, with one important exception. City staff and the petitioner continue to disagree on the design of the project's lake littoral zones. In essence, the petitioner is contesting the requirement for the provision of a littoral shelf as stated in the City code. Following extensive negotiations with City staff, the petitioner has filed request for a waiver from the littoral zone requirement. Staff is recommending denial of the waiver. This item will be discussed during the hearing on Thursday evening. Due to ongoing negotiations, a few of the conditions of approval have been revised. Attached to this memorandum is a final set of the conditions. LK 11 % o-W s k , U OF- Z �-,- l a. •ads c G 69k �6 ,w. r,oT 62- 0 -U - Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order Project Plans and Uses 1. The height of the office use shall be subject to design and site plan review for final determination and shall be limited to no more than 60' from average elevation at the base of the building to the top of the parapet. 2. Prior to the issuance of the first residential building permit, development of commercial retail uses at the 12 -acre commercial parcel will be prohibited. The commercial retail uses allowed shall be those uses identified under the CG -1 - General Commercial District in effect at the time of the adoption of this ordinance. 0 3. Lots shall not include parkways, landscape easements or buffers, lake maintenance areas or any water management area, golf course or any other community - serving open space. 4. The gatehouse, sales center and entrance features, including the Golf Club Drive 100 -foot cross - section, shall undergo site plan review and consideration by the City Council, without review of the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee. The sales center shall be limited to sales and resales of homes within the Golf Digest project. 5. Permitted uses within the `community facility' parcel include daycare center, church, recreation and/or community center, and municipal government uses. Retail commercial uses are specifically excluded. The uses shall be limited to a total of 10,000 s.f. and 793 total daily trips. • • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 6. Parcel access illustrated on the master plan are conceptual in nature and shall be subject to site plan review and modification for geometry, operational and safety design details. Parcel accesses onto Palm Beach County roadways must also be approved by the County. 7. Public road cross - sections, to be dedicated to Palm Beach County, are conceptual in nature and shall be subject to joint review by Palm Beach County and Palm Beach Gardens. 8. At a minimum, the developer shall contract with Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA) for enough reclaimed water to irrigate the golf courses and landscaped areas designed for the PGA corridor. The storage and distribution of the reclaimed water shall be consistent with a surface water management system approved by South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the City. Environmental Preservation and Landscaping 9. The applicant shall maintain all landscaped areas in compliance with landscape maintenance performance standards that may be established by the City Forester. 10. All preserve areas, native vegetation and trees to be preserved shall be identified with protective fencing. The Department shall conduct a site visit prior to commencement of land alteration or clearing to confirm that the areas identified pursuant to Chapter 102- . Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 10(5)e and the approved Preservation/Relocation Plan are protected. 11. Prior to construction plan approval or commencement of land alteration, whichever occurs first, a preservation or relocation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Department for the numerous oak trees, dahoon holly and other native canopy species which exist throughout the property in areas slated for development, i.e., outside the proposed upland and wetland preserve areas. 12. Lighting consistent with a future city- selected design for parkways, if and when necessary according to photometric analysis, shall be installed along all parkway • pathways /sidewalks concurrent with pathway /sidewalk installation. Lighting plans shall be submitted for City review concurrent with the submittal of beautification/landscape plans as outlined in conditions 13 and 14. 13. Within nine (9) months of the effective date of this amended development order, the applicant shall submit a PGA Boulevard right -of -way beautification plan, consistent with the PGA Boulevard Corridor Overlay and Parkway Overlay, for City Council approval. Council approval shall include requirements for the timing of the completion of said right -of -way beautification improvements, which shall occur no later than the timing of the parkway improvements as specified on the Common Area Phasing Plan. The maintenance of the landscaping shall be the obligation of the applicant and/or its successors and assigns. Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 14. Within nine (9) months of the effective date of this amended development order, the applicant shall submit detailed road right -of -way and parkway/buffer landscape plans for all public roads and adjacent common space areas, including pump station screening, for City Council approval. Further, landscapingibeautification plans for the North -South Parkway, from the north side of the rotary, north of PGA Boulevard, to a line parallel with the southern boundary of Parcel D, shall necessitate Planning and Zoning Commission review and recommendation prior to City Council consideration. The landscape plans for public roadways shall include conceptual median landscape details. The maintenance of the landscaping shall be the obligation of the applicant and/or its successors and assigns. Said landscaping shall be installed consistent with the Common Area Phasing Plan. 15. Detailed road right -of -way landscape plans for non - public roadways shall be reviewed and approved by the Department prior to issuance of a permit to construct said road or phase thereof. 16. Prior to commencement of land alteration/construction of any golf courses, a conceptual landscape plan and grading plan for the entire golf area (fairways /roughs, cart path areas, etc.) to be constructed shall be reviewed by the Department, in consultation with the City • Environmental Consultant. The plans shall detail and locate all golf cart and maintenance pathways, bridges, golf course structures, utility easements, vegetation to be preserved or 0 0 Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order relocated, and new landscaping. 17. Within nine (9) months of the effective date of this amended development order, the applicant shall submit detailed PCD buffer plans for City Council approval. The maintenance of the landscaping shall be the obligation of the applicant and/or its successors and assigns. Buffers shall be installed consistent with the Common Area Phasing Plan. 18. There shall be a minimum 25' buffer between all parcels and the adjacent collector road frontage within the western gated residential area. 19. Landscape buffer, in addition to the minimum 40' Parkway buffer /easements, shall be provided within development parcels, outside the Parkways, so that the following minimums are achieved: Awl 0 C. There shall be a minimum 15' landscape buffer along 50% of the commercial parcels frontage of the North -South Parkway. There shall be a minimum 15' landscape buffer along the non -water frontage of Parcels A, B and D where they abut the North -South Parkway. Landscape buffers within development parcels shall be a component of the plan details required by Condition 14 43. Said landscaping shall be 0 installed concurrent with the adjacent parkway improvements or with the development of each individual parcel, whichever occurs first. During Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order each parcel's site plan review, additional screening, if necessary, will be added to the 15' landscape buffer. d. The 15' landscape buffer shall be maintained by the same entity responsible for the parkway landscaping maintenance. 20. All internal buffer details shall be submitted and approved by the Department concurrently with the associated parcel or common area site plan. 21. Preserves and buffers shall be unencumbered by maintenance, utility or drainage easements, except as otherwise approved in the cross - sections or as may be permitted in certain locations subject to Department approval. 22. Within twelve (12) months of the effective date of this amended development order, the applicant shall submit a project signage program for City Council approval. 23. All utilities shall be placed underground and within public road rights -of -way, unless specifically approved by the Department. 24. Native vegetation within the road rights -of -way shall be protected, where possible. Clearing shall not occur until road cross - sections (construction plans) are approved by the Department. In order to receive a clearing permit, the applicant and/or its successors and assigns shall identify for Department approval areas where existing vegetation can be Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order preserved within the road rights -of -way. 25. Prior to burning of vegetative debris, the applicant and successors and/or assigns shall secure all necessary permits and approvals from the City and all other applicable agencies provide at least 48 hours written notice to the governing boards of the Eastpointe Homeowners Association, Old Marsh Homeowners Association and PGA National Property Owners Association. Dedications / Improvements 26. The applicant and/or its successors or assigns shall be responsible to construct a 9100 s.f. fire /police station pursuant to City design requirements on the parcel illustrated on the master plan. Upon completion and issuance of certificate of occupancy, the station shall be dedicated to the City (fully operational with all utilities). Such dedication shall occur prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, (excluding the sales center, and golf maintenance shed), and/or opening of a golf course, whichever occurs first. 27. The applicant shall be responsible for park and recreation impact fees in the following manner: a. The applicant and/or its successors or assigns shall construct a 15 -acre park (on the parcel illustrated on the master plan), subject to City design standards, and shall dedicate said improved park to the City prior to issuance of the 500th residential certificate of occupancy. The park Ordinance S, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order improvements, which may be modified by the City Manager, shall include the following: O a half mile -long jogging trail with vitae course along the perimeter of the site with pedestrian level lighting O 2 lighted multi -use (100 yard x 70 yard) fields O 1 lighted softball field O 6 fenced/lighted regulation sand volleyball courts O 1 1,600 s.f, play structure with safety surface O 2 pavilions and clustered picnic areas, with maintenance storage capabilities and public restrooms at one pavilion O 4 basketball courts • a lighting system adequate to illuminate the four (4) basketball courts • parking lot (lighted) constructed in accordance with city requirements • landscaping (perimeter and interior), turf and irrigation b. Said park design shall be approved by the City Manager with review by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Upon approval of the Park design, the applicant shall provide a detailed estimate of all costs related to the construction of the Park. Upon dedication of the 15 -acre park, the cost of the park improvements and land shall be credited against park and recreation impact fees due for the project. Construction costs shall be determined by the submission and approval of detailed cost estimates to 40 the Director of Parks and Recreation. In no event shall the credit received Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order be more than 115% of the approved detailed cost estimates plus the agreed upon fair market value of the land. The agreed upon fair market land value has been determined to be $720,000. Park lighting design and specifications shall be approved by the City, FPL- leased lights shall not be permitted. Parkway improvements and lighting installation shall be the responsibility of the applicant. C. Upon issuance of this amended development order, the applicant is entitled to issuance of up to 499 residential certificates of occupancy without a park and recreation impact fee payment. After the 499th certificate of occupancy has been issued, no residential building permits shall be issued until the park improvements are complete and the park land has been dedicated to the City. d. The applicant and/or its successors or assigns shall also provide the City with a cash payment in lieu of improved recreation land equivalent to the 14.5 acres due pursuant to Section 114 -421 of the City's Codes. These monies shall be due prior to issuance of the 1,000th residential certificate of occupancy and shall be paid to the City in a total lump sum, however, in no event shall the aggregate amount of the park land, park improvement costs and lump sum payment exceed the $2,867,400 impact fee due. • 28. The applicant and its successors and/or assigns shall provide the School District of Palm Beach County with a warranty deed for the 32 -acre school site by December 31, 2000. Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order The developer shall plat and dedicate the school site to the Palm Beach County School District prior to conveying the deed, and shall have satisfied each of the following conditions prior to deed conveyance: a. Applicant to provide a title policy insuring marketable title to the Palm Beach County School District. b. All ad valorem real estate taxes and assessments for the year of closing shall be pro -rated at the day of acceptance of the deed for the civic site; acceptance date to be determined by the School District Planning and Real Estate Department. C. School site shall be free and clear of all trash and debris at the time of 0 acceptance of the warranty deed. d. The applicant shall provide perimeter landscaping around the school site including the east boundary in accordance with City requirements prior to the opening of the first school. e. The 90 -foot parkway, including the pathway, shall be designed and landscaped by the applicant in accordance with City requirements and School District's review and completed prior to the opening of the first school. f. The site shall be a developable site free of environmental constraints. g. Applicant shall provide all retention, detention, and drainage required for any future development of the proposed school site by the School District. Applicant shall specifically address the following issues: Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 1. The discharge of surface water from the proposed school site into the Applicant's water retention basins. 2. Provide for easements across the Applicant's property from the proposed school site to the retention basins, if required. h. Applicant to prepare school site to buildable grade under the School Districts Program Management Department supervision. i. Applicant to provide water and sewer stubbed out to the school site property line. j. Applicant to provide a 15 -foot stabilized easement to provide for secondary access to the elementary and middle schools. The Applicant shall provide the School District with an Environmental Assessment Statement, which describes the environmental conditions of the property including Wellfield Protection Zones by November 15, 2000. 29. The following conditions shall be satisfied as terms of conditional concurrency certification: a. No more than 10,367 net new external daily trips shall be generated from the referenced project prior to widening Alternate AlA to a 6 -lane roadway from Hood Road to PGA Boulevard. b. No greater than 17,504 net new external daily trips shall be generated from the referenced project prior to the construction of a second eastbound left turn lane and a second westbound left turn lane at the intersection of Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order Donald Ross Road and Alternate AIA. C. With regard to Hood Road and Alternate AIA intersection improvements: 1. No more than 10,367 net new external trips shall be generated from the referenced project until a signal warrant analysis has been performed for the intersection of Hood Road and Alternate AIA. This signal warrant analysis shall be continued on an annual basis until the signal is warranted or buildout of the referenced project, whichever occurs first. The analysis shall be submitted to and approved by the City. 2. An intersection capacity analysis shall be performed to determine the need for additional turn lanes including, but not limited to, second northbound left turn lane and second eastbound right turn lanes. 3. Within six (6) months of the analysis showing the signal is warranted at the intersection, a contract shall be let and a notice to proceed shall be issued for installation of a traffic signal at this intersection including all appropriate lane geometry (as determined in the above referenced intersection capacity analysis), pavement markings, signage, lighting, etc., as approved. Said installation shall be completed and fully operational within 6 months of the 0 letting of the contract. d. Compliance with Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards is • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order contingent upon restricting membership to the private golf course(s) to residents of the development. Modification to the private status of the golf course(s) shall require a Development Order modification and shall require the review and approval of the Palm Beach County Traffic Division. 30. The following shall be the required lane geometry and signalization at the project entrances. The specified improvements shall be completed concurrent with each project entrance. a. Hood Road and Project Entrance: Northbound 1 Through Lane 1 Right -Turn Lane Southbound 1 Through Lane Westbound 1 Left -Turn Lane 1 Right -Turn Lane b. PGA Boulevard and East Project Entrance: Traffic Signal Northbound 1 Through Lane 1 Right -Turn Lane Southbound 1 Left -Turn Lane 1 Through Lane Eastbound 2 Through Lanes • Westbound 1 Left -Turn Lane 2 Through Lanes • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 1 Right -Turn Lane c. PGA Boulevard and West Project Entrance: Traffic signal if warranted on or before the specified build -out date contained in the traffic impact analysis prepared by Kimley -Horn and included as Exhibit number 16. Northbound 1 Through Lane 1 Right -Turn Lane Southbound 1 Left -Turn Lane 1 Through Lane Eastbound 1 Left -Turn Lane 1 Through Lane 1 Right -Turn Lane Westbound 1 Left -Turn Lane • 1 Through Lanes 1 Right -Turn Lane Further, subject to DOT approval, a pedestrian cross -walk crossing PGA Boulevard shall be provided at the Ryder Cup Boulevard/western project entrance. 31. The 200 -foot rotary section geometry, striping and signage shall be approved by the City Engineer during construction plan review. 32. No more than 16,733 net new external daily trips shall be generated from the referenced project until the following improvements are constructed at the intersection of Prosperity Farms Road and PGA Boulevard: Dual left turn lanes East and West Approach. • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 33. a. In order to comply with the mandatory Traffic Performance Standards, the applicant shall fund and/or cause commencement of the construction (let a contract and issue a notice to proceed) of PGA Boulevard as a four lane divided roadway on or before January 31, 2004 or prior to issuance of building permits which generate more than 17,276 net new external daily trips based upon the traffic impact analysis prepared by Kimley Horn, referenced as exhibit 17 in Section 4 of this ordinance, whichever occurs first. The applicant shall prepare the construction plans for the four laning of PGA Boulevard from the Avenue of the Champions to Ryder Cup Boulevard and obtain the necessary permits in a time frame to allow the road construction to commence on or before January 31, 2004 or prior to issuance of building permits which generate more than 17,276 net new external daily trips, whichever occurs first. The applicant shall enter into an escrow agreement with Palm Beach County that will cause to be placed in an escrow account road impact fee monies which are due at the time of obtaining building permits for development within the project. The monies accumulated in the escrow account will be used to fund the plans preparation and construction costs of the road improvement. b. If the monies in the escrow account are insufficient to adequately fund plans preparation and/or construction costs, the applicant will advance the payment of road impact fee monies and any other monies sufficient to cover the necessary expenditures. • • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order C. To guarantee plans preparation and construction of the four lane PGA Boulevard improvement, the applicant may request that the existing surety with the City be released after replacement surety is provided to Palm Beach County which is in a form acceptable to the City and which approximately retains the City's interest in said surety which shall be in the amount of 110 percent of the estimated cost for plans preparation and construction of the PGA Boulevard four lane improvement. 34. The applicant shall dedicate the Jog Road right -of -way by October 31, 2000 or upon recordation of the first residential plat, whichever occurs first. Right -of -way landscaping shall remain the installation and maintenance responsibility of the applicant and/or its successor and assigns. 35. During the course of development, all property within the PCD shall be platted. Surface Water Management 36. No construction of any portion of the surface water management system shall be undertaken without first submitting to the City's plans, specifications, and supporting computations for review and approval by the City. Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 37. Any proposed changes to the South Florida Water Management District Conceptual Surface Water Management permit shall be concurrently submitted to the City for review and City approval. 38. The applicant has represented to the City and to South Florida Water Management District that the project area will be a unit of the Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, excluding permits for infrastructure improvements, all criteria required by law to assess, operate, and maintain said unit must be confirmed in writing to the City by Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District. 39. The applicant shall comply with all Federal EPA and State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection NPDES permit requirements, including but not limited to, preparation of a stormwater pollution prevention plan and identification of appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP) for construction activities, submission of a Notice of Intent to EPA or their designee, implementation of the approved plan, inspection and maintenance of controls during construction, and submission of a storm water Notice of Termination. 40. The applicant shall diligently process its application to SFWMD ( SFWMD #990129 -8) for a water use permit to withdraw, via pump, 10.4 MGD Maximum Daily Flow (MDF) from the C -18 Canal/Loxahatchee Slough into the project lakes. This application shall be consistent with (1) the water use permit issued to SUA to increase the allocation for the • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order • Hood Road Wellfield from 10.4 MGD Average Annual Daily Flow (AADF) up to 13.8 MGD AADF and (2) the augmentation of groundwater /wellfield recharge. 41. The construction, operation and/or maintenance of any elements of the subject project shall not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage of surrounding areas including but not limited to East Pointe, Old Marsh, Hood Road, PGA Boulevard, and the Turnpike. If, at any time during project development it is determined by the City that any of the surrounding areas are experiencing negative drainage impacts caused by the project, it shall be the applicant's responsibility to cure said impacts in a period of time and in a manner acceptable to the City. 42. Until such time as a water use permit for a minimum rate of 7.0 MGD MDF, or such lesser amount agreed to by the applicant, SFWMD, City Engineer and SUA, is issued to the Applicant by SFWMD to provide water from the C- 18 /Loxahatchee Slough (the "Water Use Permit ") to the project and facilities are constructed and operational to transfer said water into the water management system consistent with the ERP, the existing east/west canal or an approved equivalent alternate gravity conveyance acceptable to SFWMD and the City (the "Gravity System "), shall remain in service as a recharge facility to SUA's Hood Road wellfield. • 43. Any temporary construction associated with phasing the proposed surface water management system improvements shall be undertaken so as not to impact native • • �J Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order vegetation in designated buffer areas, preserve areas, and parkway areas. 44. All areas designated for maintenance of the surface water management system shall be no less than 20, wide (minimum) with graded slopes no steeper than 8:1 (horizontal: vertical), or as may be otherwise required by the Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District. No construction or landscaping shall be permitted in the maintenance areas that will in any way restrict, impede, or otherwise limit the use of these areas for their intended purpose. 45. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, excluding permits for infrastructure improvements, the applicant shall provide surety acceptable to the City in the amount of 110% of the estimated cost of constructing the surface water management system included in the South Florida Water Management District Conceptual Environmental Resource permit for this project. 46. Prior to issuance of building permits for construction of residential homes, golf club facilities and/or commercial areas, a contract shall be let and a notice to proceed shall be issued by the applicant for construction of that portion of the surface water management system such that legal positive drainage, required levels of service, and performance standards for flood protection in accordance with the City's codes and ordinances are achieved so that in the event the project is temporarily delayed or permanently discontinued, the partially constructed system will meet all required surface water Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order management system levels of service and performance standards. No Certificates of Occupancy will be issued until the approved phased portion of the Surface Water Management System has been completed, certified by the engineer of record, and determined acceptable by the City Engineer, Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District ( NPBCID), and SFWMD. 47. No construction/land alteration shall occur until a environmental resource permit for construction and operation of the water management system, or portions thereof are issued by SFWMD and approved by the City. • 48. If necessary and beneficial, as determined by the City Engineer, the Applicant and/or NPBCID shall implement the "Isolated Lake Plan" contained in the conceptual ERP and shown on the attached exhibit entitled 1999 Conceptual Water Management Plan Revision #9 and dated 3 -27 -00 when directed by the City Engineer. 49. The water management system shall be designed to accommodate and accept a minimum of 8.1 cfs of discharge from the Turnpike drainage system into the Golf Digest project until such time as an alternative discharge route is available outside the project (to be provided by others) or a discharge is not necessary as determined by the City Engineer, and subject to Condition No. 41. Additionally, the conveyance system will gate off flows into the Turnpike ditches when water levels exceed 15.0' NGVD or as otherwise set forth in an operational schedule to be formulated by the City, SUA and NPBCID and as 0 Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order is • permitted by SFWMD. The gated structure will be operated by NPBCID. If necessary, as determined by the City Engineer, a pump shall be installed by the applicant and/or NPBCID to accept the Turnpike discharge. 50. The water management system shall continue to be analyzed and designed using a dynamic analysis acceptable to the City, accounting for piping systems and flood routing in order to establish minimum road, berm and finished floor elevations. These elevations shall be documented in tabular form including sub -basin number and master plan parcel identification on the drainage plans approved by the City. Water surface elevations determined from the dynamic model analysis shall prevail and supersede those contained in the SFWMD conceptual Environmental Resource Permit. A building permit for a permanent sales center may be issued when the results of the dynamic model are accepted by the City. Water and Sewer 51. The existing 10" SUA PVC reclaimed water main, located in the PGA Blvd. Right -of- way, shall be relocated concurrent with the project's PGA Boulevard improvements. The location of the main shall be coordinated with the City Forester, prior to final approval of the construction plans, to avoid conflicts, where possible, with landscaping. 52. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, excluding building permits relating to infrastructure improvements, golf course maintenance facilities, sales center, gatehouse, 0 Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order entry features (landscape, project identification walls and the like), applicant shall provide documents satisfactory to the City and Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA) that modifies Condition number 30 in the conceptual South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) permit and Condition #9 in the COE Permit such that it clearly allows SUA the right to access, operate, maintain and repair the utility lines in the area known as Nursery Lane without having to obtain any additional permits to work in and/or disturb designated preservation areas; reference Application drawing number 41- 2 -32 -21 as prepared by Mock -Roos and dated September, 1999. 53. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, excluding building permits relating to infrastructure improvements, golf course maintenance facilities, sales center, gatehouse, entry features (landscape, project identification walls and the like), the applicant shall conclude arrangements mutually satisfactory to the developer, SUA and the City that provide an easement or right -of -way for the construction and operation and access for maintenance and repair of a transmission main from the Northwest corner of the SUA WWTP site to Hood Road. 54. NPBCID Plan of Improvement for this project shall include all elements of the master surface water management system including but not limited to the mitigation plan, isolated lake plan and turnpike pumping station. Said plan of improvements meeting this requirement and adopted by NPBClD shall be supplied to the City prior to issuing the 1st building permit, excluding infrastructure improvements. Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 55. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, excluding building permits relating to infrastructure improvements, golf course maintenance facilities, sales center, gatehouse, entry features (landscape, project identification walls and the like), the applicant shall: (1) modify the conceptual ERP to include acceptance of drainage from the SUA WWTP site including wet weather discharge from the percolation ponds and (2) provide assurance acceptable to the City that the existing conditions of drainage for the `Bonnett Property" and Hood Road are not negatively impacted by the development of the project. 56. Upon receipt of all necessary approvals (the cost of which shall be born by the applicant as a "cost to cure ") and prior to acceptance of the surface water management system, or any portion thereof, by NPBCID and the City, the applicant shall construct a water control structure for the SUA WWTP and fill the SUA WWTP site to a minimum elevation of 17.5 NGVD or as otherwise determined from the dynamic model and (2) relocate the existing SUA WWTP perimeter landscaping or implement an alternative landscape plan acceptable to the City. 57. The access road to SUA treatment plant site shall be designed to local road specifications with a minimum crown of road to be at a level of flood protection consistent with a 25 year, one day storm. • 58. The applicant and/or pp NPB ID shall C s a 1 furnish and install continuous lake stage recorders . Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order including telemetry equipment meeting NPBCID guidelines. In addition, the stage recorders and telemetry equipment shall be configured such that the City shall have the capability to install separate transmitters to monitor lake stages. Installation shall be concurrent with the acceptance of the water management system by NPBCID for all, or any portion of the system. The locations and number of stage recorders shall be in accordance with a monitoring plan mutually acceptable to the City and NPBCID. 59. Prior to the City's acceptance of the dynamic model of the surface water management system, the drainage areas (1) stated in the SFWMD conceptual environmental resource permit, (2) as shown on the 1999 Conceptual Water Management Plan, Revision #9 and isdated 3- 28 -00, and (3) included in the Conceptual Water Management Calculations must be reconciled to the satisfaction of the SFWMD and the City. Public Safety 60. The applicant and/or its successor and assigns shall provide on -site private security until the roadways are completed to deter construction theft. 61. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles established through cooperation with the City's Crime Prevention Division shall be utilized during the site planning of the development parcels. • 62. The applicant and/or its successor and assigns shall provide a stabilized road base, Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order subject to City standards, for fire /emergency access to each development parcel prior to the start of construction within said parcel. Disclosure 63. Pursuant to School Board requirements, a sign shall be posted in all sales offices /model homes which provides notice of annual school boundary assignments for students of this project. This 11"x17" notice shall be provided by the School Board. 64. A prominent statement, such as the one shown below, shall be included in sales and 65 M [7 marketing materials and property owners association documents: Golf Digest (or specific property location) is located within 4.5 miles of North County Airport, a general aviation reliever airport. Airplanes operating to, from and/or near North County Airport will be noticeable and airplane noise may be objectionable. A disclosure shall be included in sales and marketing materials and property owner's association documents which identifies that the N -S Parkway and E -W Parkway will be dedicated to Palm Beach County in the future, and that these thoroughfares have the potential of becoming six -lane facilities. The disclosure document shall be approved by resolution of the City Council prior to the first residential sale. Disclosure shall be provided to all potential home buyers and a statement shall be contained in all property owners association documents and initial sales documents which identifies the proximity of the Seacoast Utility Authority Wastewater Treatment Facility and the potential odors that may be emitted therefrom. The disclosure document shall be • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order approved by resolution of the City Council prior to the first residential sale. 67. A prominent statement acceptable to the City shall be recorded into the public records of Palm Beach County and contained in all property owners association documents and sales documents which identifies that the levels of all water bodies in the surface water management system may fluctuate dramatically during very wet or very dry periods and that the priority purpose of these water bodies is to fulfill surface water management, not aesthetics. The disclosure document shall be recorded and approved by resolution of the City Council prior to first residential sale and subsequently recorded in the public records. Performance Standards 68. The golf course(s) shall be designed and constructed by a nationally - recognized golf entity for the first five (5) years of operation, and maintained at the direction of a head golf professional who shall be a class A member of the Professional Golfer's Association of America or other national certification of equal value, who shall have at least five (5) years of experience in the Southern region. The golf management services /administration personnel shall include professional turf consultants, entomologists, plant biologists and such other professional specialists required to care and maintain the course(s). 69. Prior to the issuance of the first residential building permit, the master property owners association documents and restrictions shall be furnished by the applicant to the City Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order Attorney for review and approval prior to such documents being recorded in the Public Records of Palm Beach County. Buildout 70. Consistent with Chapter 118 -46, recordation of all plats, installation of all infrastructure, common area improvements and landscaping, and dedication of facilities, rights -of -way and easements shall be completed prior to December 31, 2004. Time extensions are subject to the criteria set forth in Chapter 118 of the City's Land Development Regulations, and any time extension request shall include a Traffic Impact Analysis to soidentify additional roadway improvements which may be required to extend the buildout of the project. Additional roadway improvements, if any, shall be incorporated into the Development Order. Monitoring 71. An annual report shall be submitted to the Growth Management Department by February Fourteenth of each year, until the project has reached buildout, that describes the project's current status and compares its progress with the provisions of the development order. • _� CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum • • Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: May 11, 2000 Subject/Agenda Item: Public Hearing /Second Reading: Ordinance 8, 2000 — Golf Digest PCD Amendments. Recommendation /Motion: Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 8, 2000 with 71 conditions. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $_0 Council Action: City Attorney Planning & Zoning Division Total [ ] Approved ACM $ 0 [ ] Approved w /conditions Current FY Other N/A [ ] Denied Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Advertised: Attachments: Date: [ IOperating U U Paper: [ x ] Not Required [ ] Other N/A Ordinance 8, 2000 Submitted by: P&?!�90 Growth Mgt. Director Affected parties [ ] Notified Budget Acct. #: [ 1 None Approved by: City Manager [ ] Not required - REQUEST: Hank Skokowski, agent for Taylor Woodrow Communities, is requesting an amendment to the Golf Digest Planned Community District approved October, 1998. The proposal includes modifications to the master plan, amendments to the parkway cross - sections, revisions to conditions of approval, and related changes to other plans and illustrations. The proposed changes do not affect the overall dwelling unit count or mix of uses. The 2,305 -acre site is located north of PGA Blvd, west of Florida's Turnpike, east of the Loxahatchee Slough and south of Hood Road. (3, 4 &5- 42S -42E and 32, 33 &34 -41S -42E) C : 3 • location map BACKGROUND: At its February 17th, 2000 meeting, the City Council approved the subject ordinance on first reading. City Council had no major concerns at this time. However, staff has been waiting for comments and conditions from South Florida Water Management District and subsequent review by the City Engineer. The City Engineer has now offered conditions which address SFWMD's comments and concerns. The primary modification to the master plan is the incorporation of 27 -holes of golf, designed by golf course architect Arthur Hills, into the southwestern residential community. The 27 holes are to be private, restricted to members that will be residents of the project. All residential development parcels located in the southwestern community have been re- designed so that each lot will have frontage on either golf or water. Golf related amenities (clubhouse, fitness center, tennis and pool facility) have also been incorporated into the southwestern community. The northeastern residential community has also been re- designed to provide water frontage for all lots. Private recreation areas are also being planned for each of these areas. 2 The surface water management plan is proposed for revision to change from the diked reservoir system to a lake system. The parkway cross - sections are being modified to locate utilities outside the road right -of -way (and within the parkway easement). Also, an additional curb is being located on the median side of the roadway pavement to allow landscape materials to be planted closer to the roadway at the time the initial improvements are constructed. The phasing of development is to generally follow a similar pattern of two phases but development is intended to occur throughout the entire project from the start. Initial site plan applications will include several residential parcels in both the southwest and northeast communities, the western PGA Blvd entrance, the sales center and gatehouse, as well as the Golf Digest Campus. All lakes and golf course holes are part of the first phase of development. COMPARISON OF APPROVED PLANS TO PROPOSED PLANS Overall the design concept of the master plan remains the same with the Golf Digest Campus and public golf course centrally located within the site, a gated residential community in the southwest area, a residential community in the northeast adjacent to the school and park sites, and a centrally located residential community adjacent to the Golf Digest Campus. The locations of the Parkways and the commercial, park, school, and golf digest maintenance parcels have all remained the same. The following is the comparison of the previously approved Master Plan and the plan currently under review for approval: O The golf courses have been designed to incorporate 27 holes of private golf into the private communities located in the southwest area of the project. O The private course has been designed to provide all lots in the southwest community with golf or water frontage. This modification will increase the value of these lots and increase the tax base of the City. O A 26.7 acre recreation area with a clubhouse, tennis and pool facilities has been added to the southwest community. • The 1.12 acre Community facility has been relocated to the area just north of the commercial parcel. • The sales center has been relocated to avoid conflicts with the entrance. • The corporate lodges proposed at the Golf Digest Campus have been removed and Club Cottage units have been added. • Golf Villas are being proposed as part of the Clubhouse parcel ( #17) located in the Southwest community. O Due to the relocation of the golf holes, the residential areas in the central area of the project have been re- designed. • O The number of High- density parcels that front the Parkway have been reduced from 4 parcels to 3 00,..1-5 • • I parcel. O Direct access, from residential parcels to the Parkway, has been limited to one parcel. O The number of curb -cuts on the North -South Parkway have been reduced from 14 to 8 allowing for continuous Parkway landscape treatments. O Total wetland/upland/preserve areas have been increased. O Community serving open space has been increased. O Individual recreation areas for the Northeast and Central communities have been provided. O A golf maintenance facility has been added to the southwest community to provide golf maintenance for the private golf courses. • The Parkway sections have been modified to locate the utility easements outside the right -of- way and to note the locations of utilities within the right -of -way. • Minimum Parkway buffers adjacent to water management tracts have been increased in size. • The minimum and average East -West Parkway Buffer widths have been increased. O Development parcels in the Southwest community have been shifted north, further away from PGA Boulevard. El liV °yU o _ 2.i _ as :: 7:i = slit xi ... 'lag -3s _ � it lit- 4 iii oil � 1�J Uzi W � W a� CL a� 4 LL fZ Qn no x s � C UO I 5c : W < A. ® aag C, (} '7 `1 r 11 YYY YYY � Y $ !j _ 2.i _ as :: 7:i = slit xi ... 'lag -3s _ � it lit- 4 iii oil � 1�J Uzi W � W a� CL a� 4 LL fZ Qn no x s � C UO I 5c : W < A. ® aag C, (} '7 `1 r 0 Site Data • CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL As part of the PCD amendment application, the petitioner requests that certain conditions be modified to take into account the delays associated with the modification of the project. There are also several conditions that reference Parcels that have been renamed, and conditions that relate to site conditions that no longer exist. The developer would also like to clarify the language of Condition number 45. The following is a list which represents the Condition modifications that are being requested and/or new conditions which the petitioner and staff have agreed upon: (deletions have been noted as: °*^Ats , new language is noted in: italics) The following condition modifications and deletions are based on condition numbers reflected in Ordinance 21, 1998 (original Golf Digest approval) Condition #1 The height of the office use shall be subject to design and site plan review for final • determination and shall be limited to no more than 60' -65' from average elevation at the base of the building to the top of the parapet. CO 9 APPROVED _'; PROPOSED" "AWE HO Residential Area 519.4 ac/ 22.5% 435.5 ac / 18.9% School Site 32.0 ac / 1.4% 32.0 ac / 1.4% Golf Digest Campus 24.5 ac / 1.1% 13.4 ac /.6% Private Clubhouse ----- - - - - -- 26.7 ac / 1.1 % Park & Recreation 31.0 ac / 1.4% 28.4 ac / 1.3% Community Facility 3.2 ac /.1% 3.1 ac /.I% Commercial Area 12.0 ac 1.5% 12.0 ac /.5% Wetland/Upland/Preserve 818.65 ac / 35.5% 845.6 ac / 36.7% Golf & Misc. Open Space 541.31 ac / 23.5% 553.66 ac / 24.0% Lakes /canals /reservoirs 245.6 ac / 10.7% 268.2 ac / 11.6% Road R.O.W. 69.6 ac / 3% 79.8 ac / 3.5% R.O.W. Dedication 5.03 ac /.2% 5.03 ac /.2% Dwelling Units 2145 2145 Community Service Open Space 1332 ac / 57.8% 1525 ac / 66.1% CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL As part of the PCD amendment application, the petitioner requests that certain conditions be modified to take into account the delays associated with the modification of the project. There are also several conditions that reference Parcels that have been renamed, and conditions that relate to site conditions that no longer exist. The developer would also like to clarify the language of Condition number 45. The following is a list which represents the Condition modifications that are being requested and/or new conditions which the petitioner and staff have agreed upon: (deletions have been noted as: °*^Ats , new language is noted in: italics) The following condition modifications and deletions are based on condition numbers reflected in Ordinance 21, 1998 (original Golf Digest approval) Condition #1 The height of the office use shall be subject to design and site plan review for final • determination and shall be limited to no more than 60' -65' from average elevation at the base of the building to the top of the parapet. CO 9 r� Condition #2 Prior to the issuance of the first residential building permit, development of commercial retail uses at the 12 -acre commercial parcel will be prohibited. The commercial retail uses allowed shall be those uses identified under the CG -1 - General Commercial District in effect at the time of the adoption of this ordinance. Condition #3 Lots shall not include parkways, landscape easements or buffers, lake maintenance areas or any water management area, golf course or any other community - serving open space. Condition #4 The gatehouse, sales center and entrance features, including the Golf Club Drive 100 foot cross - section, shall undergo site plan review and consideration by the City Council, without review of the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee. The sales center shall be limited to sales and resales of homes within the Golf Digest project. Condition #7 The length of cul -de -sacs shall not exceed 1500 feet except with intermediate turnaround facilities acceptable to the City Engineer. Condition #9 The golf eoarse(s) skull be :rrigateu with, reclaimeu .;'titer. At a minimum, the developer shall contract with Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA) for enough reclaimed water to irrigate the golf courses and landscaped areas designed for the PGA corridor. The storage and distribution of the reclaimed water shall be consistent with a surface water management system approved by South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the City. Condition#10 'Me 1;...,,,+ ^e'::,;..'le''`T°" tha* ., -, rthe - A';o,. +.,. ,..o.�.,;� o,,,.,,,,-.be a,av aaYY„vu„� u , ubv.� u Yva„v„ va u,,,vvaed by that ceftam Lease bet ,,cen the l' lae A h'.;r .T_ i�aivati .g T ^.�* a :a *he C.ty of D •1,,,'�eael� i u,aa, ...� 1-- d--n. . uuted D°ee,"'ber 20, 1990 , uv n de u, and +1 ------ Condition # 12 Drier to construction plan approval ^- comm.encen:e .t of l ::,d alteratio :.• l•,iel:e. er occurs firs* ^tion or relocation plan sh :',l be —1—++-A n-A b•' the De^^'{ ner., avr the num - cross cak, *_ee^ d hoop holly and other native canopy run u,av,a< <a .,, u species. which ,,,,,st, +.Lroughout the property in a.c.;„ slated for tie :'eivp:::e .t, :.e., viit�iiuv the nori . 1.,.. a , „u :: eiluaid pre^ier`v'e are :s. Condition #13 All preserve areas, native vegetation and trees to be preserved shall be identified with protective fencing. The Department shall conduct a site visit prior to commencement of land alteration or clearing to confirm that the areas identified pursuant to Chapter 102- 10(5)e and the approved 6 CCi�C 0 Preservation /Relocation Plan Condition #12 are protected. Condition #15 Within 9 months of the effective date of this amended development order crdm nce, the applicant shall submit a PGA Boulevard right -of -way beautification plan, consistent with the PGA Boulevard Corridor Overlay and Parkway Overlay, for City Council approval. Council approval shall include requirements for the timing of the completion of said right -of -way beautification improvements, which shall occur no later than the timing of the parkway improvements as specified on the Common Area Phasing Plan. The maintenance of the landscaping shall be the obligation of the applicant and/or its successors and assigns. Condition #16 Within 9 months of the effective date of this amended development order ordin—ance, the applicant shall submit detailed road right -of -way and parkway/buffer landscape plans for all public roads and adjacent common space areas, including pump station screening, for City Council approval. Further, landscaping/beautification plans for the North -South Parkway, from the north side of the rotary, north of PGA Boulevard, to a line parallel to the southern boundary of Parcel D shall necessitate Planning and Zoning Commission review and recommendation prior to City Council consideration. These The landscape plans for public roadways shall include conceptual median landscape details br all public roadway .s. The maintenance of the landscaping shall be the obligation of the applicant and/or its successors and assigns. Said landscaping shall be installed consistent with the Common Area Phasing Plan. Condition #17 Detailed road right -of -way landscape plans for non - public roadways shall be reviewed and approved by the Department prior to issuance of a permit to construct the land clearing said road or phase thereof. Condition #19 Within 9 months of the effective date of this amended development order crdinna ce, the applicant shall submit detailed PCD buffer plans for City Council va uaaauaavv approval. The maintenance of the landscaping shall be the obligation of the applicant and/or its successors and assigns. Buffers shall be installed consistent with the Common Area Phasing Plan. Condition #21b There shall be a minimum 15' landscape buffer along the non -water frontage of Parcels 1`:, O, P, ;^, 11 and V =s A, B, and D fi-ontage of where they abut the N -S Parkway. Condition #21c There skull be a .aaanim.0 . ' . 5' landscape lv— u f ^ Dr^_I AX-, t —f ^ ^Fth. µ v.5 i — ­.­5- e B -W Parkway, shculd the usec of the ar i be other than single- um;Iy dot: shed housing. • Condition #21d There shall be a aaa...aa. um. 15' landsoa^ec buffer oleo^ the sale-. oentc. -s f o::tage 7 0 0 • Condition #21f Condition #21g of the E W Park.: a', and *'�° westel.l entrance u.:ve. V J' u 11l V Y, s uii °_aided 1^""� Y°_flecting the reivvai 3f the 1`'' "+I"`� ^" alid 5' sidewalk t,ILLLLJ reflecting t.KLLL,.K� shall be iubin fitted vY'iti LL On An— d s of the ayYrvvai of +his vrd^aa"lce, inviudul� the Cv LL n n i Lvu Piiwi ng Piala and tie Lii " LL v . ° ng .. ::l,r mentli. In a to ,r, +h° green abu +t;., , ° ^;de ntial ^r,.°l, the IT . vru_L LLLKnai nil._ the g'i__LL uYu__ 111LL�, L_JL Yul__LJ, 1 Y,tL,.. ay °hall be loe a + -A __ the �;de -P+1,- AT.,, -tl, Q-,,+I, DPI ..a.. uulY,uy J w _LL J V l,Va1LL uVUlaa .. L,uaul_Jt uY.aj llVlll LeJlu_LLllul u_._a_t.11a_Lll. Condition #21h ^Lme n,� °a 1 ^ „� rf ° °t:,, , tl,° °1 , t:.., „Ir the T ')' ., ^tl,,,. °,, ana 41 ^:a °,,. uVU P.anJ refl__Llllg 111V 1VLV VULLV LL VL LL 2./ulll ., u,' 4 V Jlu_,.alk sl,.,ll be submit+°.1 within OO .1., „f+L,° 1 i,ftl,in !lr li„ � ULlllll VV UKV111111V4 Y,L 11 /V VKY 'J V LLl_ uFFl ,'K Vl ILLLJ V1 LL1111LLL__, 111VLK\11r1 the Co Li on Ar ea Phasin^ Pali nild +11 °_ +;—; —l`~ Lb L ul b L rl Condition #22 All internal buffer details shall be submitted and approved by the Department concurrently with the associated parcel or common area site plan. Condition #23 Preserves and buffers shall be unencumbered by maintenance, utility, or drainage easements. <l ^ls an exception, perpendicular easelilent cr;,ssings 3f buff-c., ^rlova � treatl�lents cr stands of native vegetation , except as any , pKll_.. Ky L otherwise approved in the cross - sections or as may be permitted in certain locations subject to Department approval. Condition #24 Within twelve months of the effective date of this amended development order ordinance, the applicant shall submit a project signage program for City Council a pp roval. The golf _Krll^l KJ g'`^ t +L1l1° V VILJ LVLLL D1 !V'! 1n 1 LUV,K1LV„ Y^KI V a entrance, if approved Y Vr to V pJect � + L=. I porary- aiu .niuvJ__L to fuftherr L_Ya_Y, ul L Flvj__L Jlbllub_ i vg'ia^.LL"aa. Condition #25 All utilities shall be placed underground and, where feasible, within public s rights -of -way. ^they location :nay be aYp:cved, if detel''.-' °a 1 �'y +''° LLla_u LLL_ fie” ^�iu °_lit Livt iv be ii -`fiict " " +h ^rl" " ^" tr eut nieliw laaid.".,va"^ buf ors c r°°°r"° areas. r t,a_J_l Y_ Condition #28 The applicant and/or its successors or assigns shall be responsible to construct a 9100 s.f. fire /police station pursuant to City design requirements on the parcel illustrated on the master plan; upon completion and issuance of certificate of occupancy it shall be dedicated to the City (fully operational with all utilities). Such dedication shall occur prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, excluding the sales center, and a golf maintenance shed, and/or opening of a golf course, whichever occurs first. r: 0 Condition #29 The applicant shall be responsible for park and recreation impact fees in the following manner: a. The applicant and/or its successors or assigns shall construct a 15 -acre park (on the parcel illustrated on the master plan) with tl:e X11 ^ ^ - ^� ° ......b . -p. o : emend, subject to City design standards, and shall dedicate said improved park to the City prior to issuance of the 500`x' residential b;:ildi 15 k ::pit Certificate of Occupancy. The park improvements, which may be modified by the City Manager shall include the following: X a half mile -long jogging trail with vitae course along the perimeter of the site with pedestrian level lighting. X 12 lighted reee multi -use (100 yard x 70 yard) field X I lighted softball field X 6 fenced/lighted regulation sand volleyball courts X 1 1,600 s.f. play structure with safety surface X 2 pavilions and clustered picnic areas, with maintenance storage capabilities and public restrooms at one pavilion X 4 tennis basketball courts X a lighting system to illuminate the four (4) temis basketball courts X 100 space concrete Parking lot (lighted) constructed in accordance with city requirements X landscaping (perimeter and interior), turf and irrigation b. Said park design shall be approved by the City Manager with review by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Upon approval of the park design, the applicant shall provide a detailed estimate of all costs related to the construction of the park. Upon dedication of the 15 -acre park, the cost of the park improvements and land shall be credited against park and recreation impact fees due for the project. Construction costs shall be determined by the submission and OC��3 approval of detailed cost estimates to the Director of Parks and Recreation. In no event shall the credit received be more than 115% of the approved detailed cost estimates plus the agreed upon fair market value of the land. The agreed upon fair market land value has been determined to be $720,000. W 1,^, IZ Q,O�0 be shall credited against an recre-,tio es due for impact park, n f1b p. ojject . Park lighting design and specifications shall be approved by the City, FPL -leased lights shall not be permitted. Parkway improvements and lighting installation shall not be the responsibility of the Ct� applicant. Tl:e cc�t of 1 "1 ^ te. ^ ^ — c -urts k 1'., ..+ _C_ ^st of the lighting n tem, +I,- �uSe�µll �elu —A the t n;l tr ..1. 11 be the -. ;.bi1;t ,� t1,e Q-1, , ,1 L; .a n� :.a pro Yveu t,, .�v .... uaa .uvi., vv v iv."iYvn.�ava. i �j' v ., v ­.a ..a aav . ­- t applicant, ant, ;„ 1'eu of sc h ;ol ;m—pact, Fee ,.;t„ ­A , °.,t.^„ - ,-A ;+, creu.t". h_ �..... 9 OC��3 • c. The --ppE ,ant and!--- wash a °v nt in i ; °vu of ;; n ^' ^�' °a " °Br °vut ;v n ia;'ad v ,• ,lont t. the IL n due 1pay. pro . ed re qui . al.en . o a acres ue pursuant to u °vet L-L i i � �2 i of the v;t j vv desi. These ;uvnies -hail be AUU to issuance of l,o 1 1100h CS;�1ont ;.,1 1,u;IA, -- ---;+ .,d -1,nll be .,n; l to th.. Yr ;ca v a.,.auuaavv va a.aav a,v rv., auvaauua uaaab Yvaaaaaa uaa uaauaa ruau w v l,,-- .,f'Q1 A00 AM Tl,i, --+ 1­1 11 be vaa� as u auaaar ., uaaa v .y a,�vi, —. a v u nivuaaa, —A va—V; ub"— i,a pa.L and ntio ,.t F l„o F tl,o t aa. aaa.. avvreu�avai ;aiay as a ivcs due iva uav project. C. Upon issuance of this amended development order, the applicant is entitled to issuance of up to 499 residential certificates of occupancy without a park and recreation impact fee payment. After the 499`h certificate of occupancy has been issued, no residential building permits shall be issued until the park improvements are complete and the park land has been dedicated to the City. d. The applicant and/or its successors or assigns shall also provide the City with a cash payment in lieu of improved recreation land equivalent to the 14.5 acres due pursuant to Section 114 -421 of the City's Codes. These monies shall be due prior to issuance of the 1, 000'h residential certificate of occupancy and shall be paid to the City in a total lump sum, however, in no event shall the aggregate amount of the park land, park improvement costs and lump sum payment exceed the $2,867,400 impact fee due. . Condition #30 The applicant and its successors and/or assigns shall provide the School District of Palm Beach County with a warranty deed for the 32 -acre school site by Ja :ua.y 31, 201001. December 31, 2000. The developer shall plat and dedicate the school site to the Palm Beach County School District prior to conveying the deed, and shall have satisfied each of the following conditions prior to deed conveyance. ...(Conditions a through j to remain as written)... The applicant shall provide the Scheel District with a certified of the proposed ^ ^h^ ^1 site by Septle. ber 1 191(191 CUn,c., aqua ivy va pavpv�vu .av vva .,aav by uvY avaaavva a, iii, u y 01'--111 reflect the boundary and :to and t v avuvva v boundary wrvba urauvua ur ea,w v aaav S., and thu sur .,cy shaii ai ect iii ;ai ;"'u"' TBC1'ui;cai vtaiadar d."i ivr u �icuaidui j vui vey aaj u.6. The applicant shall provide the School District with an Environmental Assessment Statement, which describes the environmental conditions of the property including Wellfield Protection Zones by I a :ua: y 15, 2000 November 15, 2000. • Condition #31. Compliance with Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards is contingent upon restricting membership to the private golf course(s) to residents of the development. Modification to the private status of the golf courses) shall require a Development Order modification and shall require the review and approval of the Palm Beach County Traffic Division. 10 1 Condition #31d Further, subject to DOT approval, a pedestrian cross -walk crossing PGA Boulevard shall be provided at the Ryder Cup Boulevard/western project entrance. Condition #32 The following shall be the required lane geometry and signalization at the project entrances. The specified improvements shall be completed concurrent with each project entrance. c. PGA Boulevard and West Project Entrance: Traffic signal if warranted on or before the specified build -out date contained in the traffic impact analysis prepared by Kimley -Horn and included as Exhibit number 16 Northbound 1 Through Lane 1 Right -Turn Lane Southbound 1 Left -Turn Lane 1 Through Lane Eastbound 1 Left -Turn Lane . 1 Through Lane 1 Right -Turn Lane is Westbound 1 Left -Turn Lane 1 Through Lanes 1 Right -Turn Lane Condition #34c To guarantee p'.a.s preparation a.d construction of the our lane PGA B0ul.C'a d i er e.t +he applicant, S"ull „vidC the O ; +y :.itli s,lrety, .it,l�, .'..11, , � t,r., ...1.. .� , acceptable to tl�e C. ,', :. the �1:'.o'u t of "n 11.. Y.l....�..1 t1ann. �° "ration ua ^d cvia.^atra,'activli of th °v Dv A Rvuiv�'urd lvui �a"i.v „al. t.l �.l.all al /K\ ..,.,.a +1,^ —C +u a °4F +;..° uiiYiv �'clii °visa.., �. lulus van k—I 111Va1u1J vl vuvvu v v uuw v Yluvl order vi uYvll 1JJKaa11VV _r +L. ireat''i::iiuilig YVa- -, Yv.l.l� excluding w for sith b awuuvaaxly i.iYr­.a.u1V1uJ, :. hichever a"..a..a.u1J first. Condition #35 The applicant shall dedicate the Jog Road right -of -way by Dccc: fiber 31 1999, October 31, 2000 or upon recordation of the first residential plat, excluding the Golf Cottage., .d Corporate Lodges, whichever occurs first. Right-of-way bVJ � Y�.al b„J, g Y landscaping shall remain the installation and maintenance responsibility of the applicant and/or its successor and assigns. 11 r C Condition #38 Once issued Any proposed changes to the South Florida Water Management District Conceptual Surface Water Management permit shall be concurrently submitted to the City for review and City approval. Condition #41 - -u`y' i of to °v v°f vcti � °v uut °v of +i a"iii°c-c- i elop.aaent vrAcr, the The applicant shall diligently process its application to SFWMD (SFWMD 9990129 -8) for a water use permit to withdraw, via pump, 10.4 MGD Maximum Daily Flow (MDF) from the C -18 Canal/Loxahatchee Slough into the project lakes. This application shall be ; corm .aced consistent with (1) the water use permit issued to applicaI . hled by SUA (SFWMD #("4120;' 10 #50- 00365 -9) to increase the allocation for the Hood Road Wellfield from 10.4 MGD Average Annual Daily Flow (AADF) and (2) the augmentation Of groundwaterlwellfield recharge. Condition 942 The construction, operation and/or maintenance of any elements of the subject project shall not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage of surrounding areas including but not limited to East Pointe, Old Marsh, Hood Road, PGA Boulevard, and the Turnpike. If, at any time during project development it is determined by the City that any of the surrounding areas are experiencing negative drainage impacts caused by the project, it shall be the developers responsibility to cure said impacts in a period of time and in a manner acceptable to the City. Condition #43 Until such time as a water use permit fora minimum rate of 7.0 MGD MDF, or such lessor amount agreed to by the applicant, SFWMD, City Engineer and SUA, is issued to the Applicant by SFWMD to provide water from the C- 18ILoxahatchee Slough (the "Water Use Permit') to the project, the existing east/west canal that co -.- +t Q—+T, Flc ua ";'ater T%X— ^ °„ ° ^* n; +i4 C ' r Ca :al :.'ith +I,- :':: pile boo —to::' canal or an approved equivalent alternate gravity conveyance acceptable to SFWMD and the City (the "Gravity System'), shall remain in service as a recharge facility to Seaeeast -amity i utuc t °i E°iu ui uit °rute s-- u w ui- vi. -o j cviwiiuc ed A °' +i v C at g su .w tc fun ,. ^....�' :�u. tc cr be +ter than +:e . ..b SUA 's Hood Road wellfield. Condition #45 All areas designated for maintenance of the surface water management system shall be no less than 45' 20' wide (minimum) and with graded slopes no steeper than 8:1 (horizontal:vertical) or as may be otherwise required by the Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District. No construction of landscaping shall be permitted in the maintenance areas that will in any way restrict, impede, or otherwise limit the use of these areas for their intended purpose. 12 r:r;n 00 -Jo Condition 946 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, excluding permits for infrastructure improvements, the applicant shall provide surety acceptable to the City in the amount of 110% of the estimated cost of constructing that portion of the surface water management system included in the South Florida Water Management District Conceptual Sur ace 1,11ate. Tlfanagefftent Environmental Resource permit for this project. Condition #47 Prior to issuance of building permits for construction of residential pare; is homes, golf club facilities and/or commercial areas, a contract shall be let and a notice to proceed shall be issued by the applicant for construction of that portion of the surface water management system such that legal positive drainage, required levels of service, and performance standards for flood protection in accordance with the City's codes and ordinances are achieved so that in the event the project is temporarily delayed or permanently discontinued, the partially constructed system will meet all required surface water management system levels of service and performance standards. No Certificates of Occupancy will be issued until the approved phased portion of the Surface Water Management System has been completed, certified by the engineer of record, and determined acceptable by the City Engineer, Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District (NPBCID), and SFWMD. of th-c balance „r the 1VV VL ,. UUL Ll4VV Y,K u£, V111VL11 J�''J lVlll JVl LLL UL L,LL -c%Y,u,+. J L :5.,11.°LLt f,el^: It. Condition #48 No construction/land alteration shall occur until a surf -ce :rate: ma-ragerlent environmental resource permit for construction and operation of the water management system, or portions thereof are issued by SFWMD and approved by the City. acceptable tv aQ rAXrAXL —A the vita' i , uYpio °vd. Condition 949 Failure to obtain a .rater M.—on--b—cm—C.—ft, SFxxrh n and the IL v Q , 1104 vll� v� vvvallvva i V Jaa v,LUJV J vl Laal41lvv V u.ulvaaauuvual) uLL11Vu to the Ci r. u lcil nsiderution. Condition #50 The apphoa t shall enter into :. m=tcr sc :'er =: , ::'titer ^^� ��^,� ^* :: ,th S;,acoasl -LLit, n LL-it" fur the entire nrr� ^ na , ,,.; to u ^ said ^ ° °-„ent t J L ..L, .. pL V . lu. , op j' ,xbl.. 111 O the �.t, r: or to the of pct ;vc date of this Develop —ment ^iuer- t,lll� 111 Condition #52 xx'itl:in An days of the ; f active date of this ord� :once; Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles shall be established through cooperation in canJ'uLction with the City's Crime Prevention Division. - These design rin -c les shall be utilized during the site planning of the bll pllll.,lpl., g P g development parcels. 13 • Condition #57 Disclosure, acceptable to the City, shall be provided to all potential home buyers and a statement shall be contained in all property owners association documents and initial sales documents which identifies the proximity of the Seacoast Utility Authority Wastewater Treatment Facility and the potential odors that may be emitted therefrom. Condition 958 A prominent statement acceptable to the City shall be recorded into the public records of Palm Beach County and contained in all property owners association documents and sales documents which identifies that the levels of all water bodies in the surface water management system may fluctuate dramatically during very wet or very dry periods and that the priority purpose of these water bodies is to fulfill surface water management, not aesthetics. The following are entirely new conditions which have been added since the original approval. The numbering system reflects the numbering in the new development ordinance (Ordinance 8, 2000): Ordinance 8, 2000 Condition 31: The 200 -foot rotary section geometry, striping and signage shall be approved by the City Engineer during construction plan review. iOrdinance 8, 2000 Condition 48: If necessary and beneficial, as determined by the City, the Applicant and/or NPBCID shall implement the "Isolated Lake Plan" contained in the conceptual ERP and shown on the attached exhibit entitled 1999 Conceptual Water Management Plan Revision #9 and dated 3 -27 -00 when directed by the City Engineer. Ordinance 8, 2000 Condition 49 The water management system shall be designed to accommodate and accept a minimum of 8.1 cfs of discharge from the Turnpike drainage system into the Golf Digest project until such time as an alternative discharge route is available outside the project (to be provided by others) or a discharge is not necessary as determined by the City Engineer, and subject to Condition No. 40. Additionally, the conveyance system will gate off flows into the Turnpike ditches when water levels exceed 15.0' NGVD or as otherwise set forth in an operational schedule to be formulated by the City, SUA and NPBCID and as permitted by SFWMD. The gated structure will be operated by NPBCID. If necessary, as determined by the City Engineer, a pump shall be installed by the applicant and/or HPBCID to accept the Turnpike discharge. 14 e r' , • Ordinance 8, 2000 Condition 50 The water management system shall continue to be analyzed and designed using a dynamic analysis acceptable to the City, accounting for piping systems and flood routing in order to establish minimum road, berm and finished floor elevations. These elevations shall be documented in tabular form including sub -basin number and master plan parcel identification on the drainage plans approved by the City. Water surface elevations determined from the dynamic model analysis shall prevail and supersede those contained in the SFWMD conceptual Environmental Resource Permit. Ordinance 8, 2000 Condition 51 The existing 10" SUA PVC reclaimed water main, located in the PGA Blvd. Right -of -way, shall be relocated concurrent with the project's PGA Boulevard improvements. The location of the main shall be coordinated with the City Forester, prior to final approval of the construction plans, to avoid conflicts, where possible, with landscaping. Ordinance 8, 2000 Condition 52 Prior to the issuance of any building permits, excluding Infrastructure improvements, golf course • maintenance facility, sales center, gatehouse and entry features, the applicant shall provide documents satisfactory to the City and Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA) that modifies Condition number 30 in the conceptual South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) permit and Condition #9 in the COE Permit such that it clearly allows SUA the right to access, operate, maintain and repair the utility lines in the area known as Nursery Lane without having to obtain any additional permits to work in and/or disturb designated preservation areas; reference Application drawing number 41- 2 -32 -21 as prepared by Mock -Roos and dated September, 1999. Ordinance 8, 2000 Condition 53 Prior to the issuance of any building permits, excluding infrastructure improvements, golf course maintenance facility, temporary sales center (no permanent construction), gatehouse, entry features (landscape, project identification walls and the like), the applicant shall conclude arrangements satisfactory to the developer, SUA and the City that provide an easement or right -of -way for the construction and operation and access for maintenance and repair of a transmission main from the Northwest corner of the SUA WWTP site to Hood Road. Ordinance 8, 2000 Condition 54 NPBCID Plan of Improvement for this project shall include all elements of the master surface water management system including but not limited to the mitigation plan, isolated lake plan and turnpike • pumping station. Said plan of improvements meeting this requirement and adopted by NPBCID 15 e shall be supplied to the City prior to issuing the I" building permit, excluding infrastructure improvements. Ordinance 8, 2000 Condition 55 Prior to the issuance of any building permits, excluding infrastructure improvements, golf course maintenance facility, sales center, gatehouse and entry features, applicant shall (1) modify the conceptual ERP to include acceptance of drainage from the SUA WWTP site including wet weather discharge from the percolation ponds and provide assurance acceptable to the City that the existing conditions of drainage for the `Bonnett Propert/, ' and Hood Road is not negatively impacted by the development of the project. (4) Relocate the existing SUA perimeter landscaping or implement an alternative landscape plan acceptable to the City and (5) Provide resolution of drainage for the "Bonnett Property" and Hood Road that is satisfactory to the City and doesn't worsen the existing Conditions. Ordinance 8, 2000 Condition 56 Upon receipt of all necessary approvals (the cost of which shall be born by Golf Digest as a "cost to cure ") the applicant shall construct a water control structure for the SUA WWTP and fill the SUA WWTP site to a minimum elevation of 17.5 NGVD or as otherwise determined from the dynamic model and relocated the existing SUA WWTP perimeter landscaping or implement an alternative landscape plan acceptable to the City prior to acceptance of the surface water management system, or any portion thereof, by NPBCID and the City. Ordinance 8, 2000 Condition 57 The access road to SUA treatment plant site shall be designed to local road specifications with a minimum crown of road to be at a level of flood protection consistent with a 25 year, one day storm. Ordinance 8, 2000 Condition 58 The applicant and/or NPBCID shall furnish and install continuous lake stage recorders including telemetry equipment meeting NPBCID guidelines. In addition, the stage recorders and telemetry equipment shall be configured such that the City shall have the capability to install separate transmitters to monitor lake stages. Installation shall be concurrent with the acceptance of the water management system by NPBCID for all, or any portion of the system. The locations and number of stage recorders shall be in accordance with a monitoring plan mutually acceptable to the City and NPBCID. Ordinance 8, 2000 Condition 59 Prior to the City's acceptance of the dynamic model of the surface water management system, the drainage areas (1) stated in the SFWMD conceptual environmental resource permit, (2) as shown 16 on the 1999 Conceptual Water Management Plan, Revision #9 and dated 3- 28 -00, and (3) included in the Conceptual Water Management Calculations must be reconciled to the satisfaction of the SFWMD and the City. Ordinance 8, 2000 Condition 68 The golf course(s) shall be designed and constructed by a nationally - recognized golf entity for the first five (5) years of operation, and maintained at the direction of a head golf professional who shall be a class A member of the Professional Golfer's Association of America or other national certification of equal value, who shall have at least five (5) years of experience in the Southern region. The golf management services /administration personnel shall include professional turf consultants, entomologists, plant biologists and such other professional specialists required to care and maintain the course(s). Ordinance 8, 2000 Condition 71 An annual report shall be submitted to the Growth Management Department by February Fourteenth of each year, until the project has reached buildout, that describes the project's current status and compares its progress with the provisions of the development order. CONCERNS /ISSUES . O Due to the reconfiguration of the golf courses, Golf Digest now has less of a presence in the project. It was this major golf entity and its reputation that made the project attractive from the start. Council =s concern for the quality of the golf operation is evidenced in Condition #62. Staff will be seeking a policy determination from the City Council has to whether the developer is in compliance with the provisions of the condition with the redesigned project. O The parkway cross - sections are still averaged to achieve a width consistent with the comprehensive plan requirement of 300'. Now, more water is used within the North -South Parkway to achieve the adequate (averaged) width. The City' s parkway system has been recognized as an urban component of the Florida Greenways System. As this label suggests, the intent was to create linear greenways within the City versus waterways. O The re- configuration of the pods renews staff' s concerns about the length of the roads without adequate turnarounds for public safety and utility vehicles. Condition #7 limits the length of roads to 1500 feet, consistent with general subdivision regulations. O At a February, 1999 City Council meeting, the Council directed staff to instruct the petitioner to modify plans so that PGA Boulevard could be shifted in a northerly direction away from the existing PGA National residences. The petitioner has refused to shift the right -of -way, but has worked with FDOT to shift the four -lane cross - section within the right -of -way. The short-term result is a 4 -lane cross - section located within the northerly portion of the right -of -way. However, • the 2020 Plan identifies the need for a six -lane arterial to Ryder Cup Boulevard. The petitioner's 17 `�tvi • proposal will not resolve the long -term issue of potential negative impacts to the PGA g p National residents due to the arterial. O Staff notes that improvements will need to be provided consistent with the Common Area Phasing Plan which will necessitate the submittal of landscape plans in the near future, however, we will agree to the time extension provided by the modified language in the conditions of approval. O The Golf Digest application for a PCD Plan Amendment is also accompanied by a proposal to change the approved surface water management system. Because the proposed changes are substantial, there has been a major effort on the part of the applicant, South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA), and the City at working through very complex technical issues in seeking acceptable solutions for all affected parties. Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District (NPBCID) has not been as active in the "process" to date; however they are keenly aware of the issues and City representatives are in constant communication with their staff. The structure of a development order for this project regarding surface water management is probably the most significant resource decision confronting the City since its existence. RECOMMENDATION 1-0 Staff recommends approval of the amendments to the Golf Digest PCD master plan and development order. • The ordinance has been prepared as an amended and restated development order that contains the development order in its entirety. This will assist in the monitoring and will avoid confusion in the future. 18 0 clot,-( lot, -( 1/23/00 2/11/00 5/18/00 ORDINANCE 8, 2000 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF ORDINANCE 21, 1998, THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE GOLF DIGEST PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT, BY ADOPTING AN AMENDED DEVELOPMENT ORDER; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF THE MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO RECONFIGURE GOLF AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PARCELS; PROVIDING FOR MODIFIED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on October 15, 1998, the City Council adopted Ordinance 21, 1998, which approved the rezoning of lands located between PGA Boulevard and Hood Road, west of Florida's Turnpike, known as "Golf Digest" to Planned Community District ( "PCD "); and WHEREAS, the City of Palm Beach Gardens has received an application from TWC /Golf Digest Ltd. to amend the development order for the Golf Digest; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department (the "Department ") has reviewed said petition and determined that is sufficient; and WHEREAS, the PCD amendment is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: SECTION 1 The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida hereby approves the application of TWC /Golf Digest Ltd. for amendments to the approved Golf Digest Planned Community District. The development order, as amended, is herein restated OGG3 Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order and modified accordingly: A. The master plan is reconfigured to incorporate a private golf course into the southwest residential community; B. The surface water management system is revised from a reservoir system to a lake system; C. Conditions 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 13, 15, 16, 17, 19, 21b, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, 29, 31, 31d, 32, 35, 38, 41, 42, 43, 45, 46, 47, 48, 52, 57, 58 as adopted by Ordinance 21, 1998 are modified herein. In addition, Conditions 10, 12, 21c, 21d, 21f, 21g, 21h, 34c, 49 and 50 have been deleted and fifteen new conditions, numbered 27c, 27d, 31, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 68 and 71, have been added to the development order, conditions have been renumbered accordingly. D. Exhibits have been modified to depict A and B above, as necessary. SECTION 2. The following provisions shall apply in this ordinance: A. For purposes of this ordinance, the term Applicant shall refer to TWC /Golf Digest Ltd. The Applicant shall be the sole party responsible for the obligations herein, unless such obligations are specifically and expressly assigned by the Applicant, in whole or in part. At such time as the master Property Owner's Association (POA) is duly formed and incorporated, the POA shall be made responsible for those obligations relating to • environmental preservation, landscape maintenance, including buffer, parkway and 2 Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order easement areas, and other related aesthetic improvements as shall be agreed upon in the POA documents. B. Development of this project shall be in conformity with all codes, ordinances, rules and regulations of the City as such may be amended from time to time, including, but not limited to, the City's landscape and natural resources requirements. In the event of conflict between the provisions of this ordinance and a code, ordinance, rule or regulation of the City, the provisions of this ordinance shall prevail. SECTION 3. The following waivers are hereby granted with this approval: A. PCD Master Plan Submission Requirements • 1. Section 118- 50(2)a6 (total land area/open space) 2. Section 118- 50(2)al5 (signage locations) 3. Section 118- 50(2)n (landscape plan) Subsequent site plan review and approval shall be required for: 1) the location and amount of open space included in each residential and nonresidential area; 2) signage locations; 3) detailed landscape plans in compliance with Chapter 98 for buffers, entrance features and common areas; 4) elevation of landscaping/screening around pump stations; 5) cross - section/landscape plan for road to the Seacoast Utility Authority plant; 6) details on the areas between parcels; and 7) details for common areas or other sites not defined within a parcel (sales center, gatehouse, entrance features). • B. Subdivision Design Standards 3 I;UJ Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 1. Section 114 -213 (sidewalks) to allow sidewalks on one side only of streets. Sidewalks shall be installed consistent with the Sidewalk Location Plan. C. Zoning Supplementary Regulations 1. Section 118 -278 (height limitations) to allow a maximum potential height of 65' for the office use from the code limitation of 36; 45' for the commercial use from the code limitation of 36; and 50' for residential high (RH) pods from the code limitation of 45'. SECTION 4. Said Planned Community District is approved subject to the following conditions which are the obligation of the applicant and its successors and/or assigns (the conditions listed in this Section supercede and replace the conditions listed in Section 4 of Ordinance 21,1998: Project Plans and Uses 1. The height of the office use shall be subject to design and site plan review for final determination and shall be limited to no more than 60' -65' from average elevation at the base of the building to the top of the parapet. 2. Prior to the issuance of the first residential building permit, development of commercial retail uses at the 12 -acre commercial parcel will be prohibited. The commercial retail uses allowed shall be those uses identified under the CG -1 - General Commercial District in effect at the time of the adoption of this ordinance. 4 �CL�� • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 3. Lots shall not include parkways, landscape easements or buffers, lake maintenance areas or any water management area, golf course or any other community - serving open space. 4. The gatehouse, sales center and entrance features, including the Golf Club Drive 100 -foot • cross - section, shall undergo site plan review and consideration by the City Council, without review of the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee. The sales center shall be limited to sales and resales of homes within the Golf Digest project. 5. Permitted uses within the `community facility' parcel include daycare center, church, recreation and/or community center, and municipal government uses. Retail commercial uses are specifically excluded. The uses shall be limited to a total of 10,000 s.f. and 793 total daily trips. 6. Parcel access illustrated on the master plan are conceptual in nature and shall be subject to site plan review and modification for geometry, operational and safety design details. Parcel accesses onto Palm Beach County roadways must also be approved by the County. 7. The length of cul -de -sacs shall not exceed 1500 feet except with intermediate turnaround facilities acceptable to the City Engineer. 5 G Ordinance 8, 2000 • Golf Digest Development Order 8. Public road cross - sections, to be dedicated to Palm Beach County, are conceptual in nature and shall be subject to joint review by Palm Beach County and Palm Beach Gardens. 9. At a minimum, the developer shall contract with Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA) for enough reclaimed water to irrigate the golf courses and landscaped areas designed for the PGA corridor. The storage and distribution of the reclaimed water shall be consistent with a surface water management system approved by South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the City. Environmental Preservation and Landscaping 10. The applicant shall maintain all landscaped areas in compliance with landscape maintenance performance standards that may be established by the City Forester. 11. All preserve areas, native vegetation and trees to be preserved shall be identified with protective fencing. The Department shall conduct a site visit prior to commencement of land alteration or clearing to confirm that the areas identified pursuant to Chapter 102 - 10(5)e and the approved Preservation/Relocation Plan are protected. 12. Lighting consistent with a future city- selected design for parkways, if and when necessary subject to photometric analysis, shall be installed along all parkway pathways /sidewalks 6 C . Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order concurrent with pathway /sidewalk installation. Lighting plans shall be submitted for City review concurrent with the submittal of beautification/landscape plans as outlined in conditions 12 and 13. 13. Within nine (9) months of the effective date of this amended development order, the applicant shall submit a PGA Boulevard right -of -way beautification plan, consistent with the PGA Boulevard Corridor Overlay and Parkway Overlay, for City Council approval. Council approval shall include requirements for the timing of the completion of said right -of -way beautification improvements, which shall occur no later than the timing of the parkway improvements as specified on the Common Area Phasing Plan. The maintenance of the landscaping shall be the obligation of the applicant and/or its successors and assigns. 14. Within nine (9) months of the effective date of this amended development order, the applicant shall submit detailed road right -of -way and parkway/buffer landscape plans for all public roads and adjacent common space areas, including pump station screening, for City Council approval. Further, landscaping/beautification plans for the North -South Parkway, from the north side of the rotary, north of PGA Boulevard, to a line parallel with the southern boundary of Parcel D, shall necessitate Planning and Zoning Commission review and recommendation prior to City Council consideration. The landscape plans for public roadways shall include conceptual median landscape details. 7 Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order The maintenance of the landscaping shall be the obligation of the applicant and/or its successors and assigns. Said landscaping shall be installed consistent with the Common Area Phasing Plan. 15. Detailed road right -of -way landscape plans for non - public roadways shall be reviewed and approved by the Department prior to issuance of a permit to construct said road or phase thereof. 16. Prior to commencement of land alteration/construction of any golf courses, a conceptual landscape plan and grading plan for the entire golf area (fairways /roughs, cart path areas, etc.) to be constructed shall be .reviewed by the Department, in consultation with the City Environmental Consultant. The plans shall detail and locate all golf cart and maintenance pathways, bridges, golf course structures, utility easements, vegetation to be preserved or relocated, and new landscaping. IT Within nine (9) months of the effective date of this amended development order, the applicant shall submit detailed PCD buffer plans for City Council approval. The maintenance of the landscaping shall be the obligation of the applicant and/or its successors and assigns. Buffers shall be installed consistent with the Common Area Phasing Plan. • Cii i Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 18. There shall be a minimum 25' buffer between all parcels and the adjacent collector road frontage within the western gated residential area. 19. Landscape buffer, in addition to the minimum 40' Parkway buffer /easements, shall be provided within development parcels, outside the Parkways, so that the following minimums are achieved: a. There shall be a minimum 15' landscape buffer along 50% of the commercial parcels frontage of the North -South Parkway. b. There shall be a minimum 15' landscape buffer along the non -water frontage of Parcels A, B and D where they abut the North -South Parkway. • C. Landscape buffers within development parcels shall be a component of the p P p plan details required by Condition 13. Said landscaping shall be installed concurrent with the adjacent parkway improvements or with the development of each individual parcel, whichever occurs first. During each parcel's site plan review, additional screening, if necessary, will be added to the 15' landscape buffer. d. The 15' landscape buffer shall be maintained by the same entity responsible for the parkway landscaping maintenance. 20. All internal buffer details shall be submitted and approved by the Department concurrently with the associated parcel or common area site plan. 9 Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 21. Preserves and buffers shall be unencumbered by maintenance, utility or drainage easements, except as otherwise approved in the cross - sections or as may be permitted in certain locations subject to Department approval. 22. Within twelve (12) months of the effective date of this amended development order, the applicant shall submit a project signage program for City Council approval. 23. All utilities shall be placed underground and, where feasible, within public road rights- of-way. 24. Native vegetation within the road rights -of -way shall be protected, where possible. Clearing shall not occur until road cross - sections (construction plans) are approved by the Department. In order to receive a clearing permit, the applicant and/or its successors and assigns shall identify for Department approval areas where existing vegetation can be preserved within the road rights -of -way. 25. Prior to burning of vegetative debris, the applicant and successors and/or assigns shall provide at least 48 hours written notice to the governing boards of the Eastpointe • Homeowners Association, Old Marsh Homeowners Association and PGA National 10 r f �� Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order Property Owners Association. Dedications / Improvements 26. The applicant and/or its successors or assigns shall be responsible to construct a 9100 s.f. fire /police station pursuant to City design requirements on the parcel illustrated on the master plan. Upon completion and issuance of certificate of occupancy, the station shall be dedicated to the City (fully operational with all utilities). Such dedication shall occur prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, excluding the sales center, and a golf maintenance shed, and/or opening of a golf course, whichever occurs first. 0 27. The applicant shall be responsible for park and recreation impact fees in the following mariner: a. The applicant and/or its successors or assigns shall construct a 15 -acre park (on the parcel illustrated on the master plan), subject to City design standards, and shall dedicate said improved park to the City prior to issuance of the 500'' residential certificate of occupancy. The park improvements, which may be modified by the City Manager, shall include the following: O a half mile -long jogging trail with vitae course along the perimeter of the site with pedestrian level lighting O 2 lighted multi -use (100 yard x 70 yard) fields 11 C�''3 V41 • • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order O 1 lighted softball field O 6 fenced/lighted regulation sand volleyball courts O 1 1,600 s.f. play structure with safety surface O 2 pavilions and clustered picnic areas, with maintenance storage capabilities and public restrooms at one pavilion O 4 basketball courts O a lighting system adequate to illuminate the four (4) basketball courts O parking lot (lighted) constructed in accordance with city requirements O landscaping (perimeter and interior), turf and irrigation b. Said park design shall be approved by the City Manager with review by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Upon approval of the Park design, the applicant shall provide a detailed estimate of all costs related to the construction of the Park. Upon dedication of the 15 -acre park, the cost of the park improvements and land shall be credited against park and recreation impact fees due for the project. Construction costs shall be determined by the submission and approval of detailed cost estimates to the Director of Parks and Recreation. In no event shall the credit received be more than 115% of the approved detailed cost estimates plus the agreed upon fair market value of the land. The agreed upon fair market land value has been determined to be $720,000. Park lighting design and specifications shall be approved by the City, FPL- leased lights shall not 12 . rl i C ii • • • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order be permitted. Parkway improvements and lighting installation shall be the responsibility of the applicant. C. Upon issuance of this amended development order, the applicant is entitled to issuance of up to 499 residential certificates of occupancy without a park and recreation impact fee payment. After the 499`h certificate of occupancy has been issued, no residential building permits shall be issued until the park improvements are complete and the park land has been dedicated to the City. d. The applicant and/or its successors or assigns shall also provide the City with a cash payment in lieu of improved recreation land equivalent to the 14.5 acres due pursuant to Section 114 -421 of the City's Codes. These monies shall be due prior to issuance of the 1,000`h residential certificate of occupancy and shall be paid to the City in a total lump sum, however, in no event shall the aggregate amount of the park land, park improvement costs and lump sum payment exceed the $2,867,400 impact fee due. 28. The applicant and its successors and/or assigns shall provide the School District of Palm Beach County with a warranty deed for the 32 -acre school site by December 31, 2000. The developer shall plat and dedicate the school site to the Palm Beach County School District prior to conveying the deed, and shall have satisfied each of the following conditions prior to deed conveyance. 13 �l:J Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order a. Applicant to provide a title policy insuring marketable title to the Palm Beach County School District. b. All ad valorem real estate taxes and assessments for the year of closing shall be pro -rated at the day of acceptance of the deed for the civic site; acceptance date to be determined by the School District Planning and Real Estate Department. C. School site shall be free and clear of all trash and debris at the time of acceptance of the warranty deed. d. The applicant shall provide perimeter landscaping around the school site including the east boundary in accordance with City requirements prior to the opening of the first school. e. The 90 -foot parkway, including the pathway, shall be designed and landscaped by the applicant in accordance with City requirements and School District's review and completed prior to the opening of the first school. f. The site shall be a developable site free of environmental constraints. g. Applicant shall provide all retention, detention, and drainage required for any future development of the proposed school site by the School District. Applicant shall specifically address the following issues: 1. The discharge of surface water from the proposed school site into the Applicant's water retention basins. 14 C i "'1 tl • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 2. Provide for easements across the Applicant's property from the proposed school site to the retention basins, if required. h. Applicant to prepare school site to buildable grade under the School Districts Program Management Department supervision. i. Applicant to provide water and sewer stubbed out to the school site property line. j. Applicant to provide a 15 -foot stabilized easement to provide for secondary access to the elementary and middle schools. The Applicant shall provide the School District with an Environmental Assessment Statement, which describes the environmental conditions of the property including Wellfield Protection Zones by November 15, 2000. 29. The following conditions shall be satisfied as terms of conditional concurrency certification: a. No more than 10,367 net new external daily trips shall be generated from the referenced project prior to widening Alternate AIA to a 6 -lane roadway from Hood Road to PGA Boulevard. b. No greater than 17,504 net new external daily trips shall be generated from the referenced project prior to the construction of a second eastbound left turn lane and a second westbound left turn lane at the intersection of Donald Ross Road and Alternate AIA. 15 a Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order C. With regard to Hood Road and Alternate AlA intersection improvements: 1. No more than 10,367 net new external trips shall be generated from the referenced project until a signal warrant analysis has been performed for the intersection of Hood Road and Alternate AIA. This signal warrant analysis shall be continued on an annual basis until the signal is warranted or buildout of the referenced project, whichever occurs first. The analysis shall be submitted to and approved by the City. 2. An intersection capacity analysis shall be performed to determine the need for additional turn lanes including, but not limited to, second northbound left turn lane and second eastbound right turn lanes. 3. Within six (6) months of the analysis showing the signal is warranted at the intersection, a contract shall be let and a notice to proceed shall be issued for installation of a traffic signal at this intersection including all appropriate lane geometry (as determined in the above referenced intersection capacity analysis), pavement markings, signage, lighting, etc., as approved. Said installation shall be completed and fully operational within 6 months of the letting of the contract. d. Compliance with Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards is 16 r • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order contingent upon restricting membership to the private golf course(s) to residents of the development. Modification to the private status of the golf course(s) shall require a Development Order modification and shall require the review and approval of the Palm Beach County Traffic Division. 30. The following shall be the required lane geometry and signalization at the project entrances. The specified improvements shall be completed concurrent with each project entrance. a. Hood Road and Project Entrance: Northbound 1 Through Lane 1 Right -Turn Lane Southbound 1 Through Lane Westbound 1 Left -Turn Lane 1 Right -Turn Lane b. PGA Boulevard and East Project Entrance: Traffic Signal Northbound 1 Through Lane 1 Right -Turn Lane Southbound 1 Left -Turn Lane 1 Through Lane Eastbound 2 Through Lanes SWestbound 1 Left -Turn Lane 17 � la W • • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 2 Through Lanes 1 Right -Turn Lane c. PGA Boulevard and West Project Entrance: Traffic signal if warranted on or before the specified build -out date contained in the traffic impact analysis prepared by Kimley -Horn and included as Exhibit number 16. Northbound 1 Through Lane 1 Right -Turn Lane Southbound 1 Left -Turn Lane 1 Through Lane Eastbound 1 Left -Turn Lane 1 Through Lane 1 Right -Turn Lane Westbound 1 Left -Turn Lane 1 Through Lanes 1 Right -Turn Lane Further, subject to DOT approval, a pedestrian cross -walk crossing PGA Boulevard shall be provided at the Ryder Cup Boulevard/western project entrance. 31. The 200 -foot rotary section geometry, striping and signage shall be approved by the City Engineer during construction plan review. 32. No more than 16,733 net new external daily trips shall be generated from the referenced project until the following improvements are constructed at the intersection of Prosperity Farms Road and PGA Boulevard: Dual left turn lanes East and West Approach. 18 n Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 33. a. In order to comply with the mandatory Traffic Performance Standards, the applicant shall fund and/or cause commencement of the construction (let a contract and issue a notice to proceed) of PGA Boulevard as a four lane divided roadway on or before January 31, 2004 or prior to issuance of building permits which generate more than 17,276 net new external daily trips based upon the traffic impact analysis prepared by Kimley Horn, referenced as exhibit 17 in Section 4 of this ordinance, whichever occurs first. The applicant shall prepare the construction plans for the four laning of PGA Boulevard from the Avenue of the Champions to Ryder Cup Boulevard and obtain the necessary permits in a • time frame to allow the road construction to commence on or before January 31, 2004 or prior to issuance of building permits which generate more than 17,276 net new external daily trips, whichever occurs first. The applicant shall enter into an escrow agreement with Palm Beach County that will cause to be placed in an escrow account road impact fee monies which are due at the time of obtaining building permits for development within the project. The monies accumulated in the escrow account will be used to fund the plans preparation and construction costs of the road improvement. b. If the monies in the escrow account are insufficient to adequately fund plans preparation and/or construction costs, the applicant will advance the payment of road impact fee monies and any other monies sufficient to cover the necessary 19 • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order expenditures. 34. The applicant shall dedicate the Jog Road right -of -way by October 31, 2000 or upon recordation of the first residential plat, whichever occurs first. Right -of -way landscaping shall remain the installation and maintenance responsibility of the applicant and/or its successor and assigns. 35. During the course of development, all property within the PCD shall be platted. Surface Water Management • 36. No construction of any portion of the surface water management system shall be undertaken without first submitting to the City, plans, specifications, and supporting computations for review and approval by the City. 37. Any proposed changes to the South Florida Water Management District Conceptual Surface Water Management permit shall be concurrently submitted to the City for review and City approval. 38. The applicant has represented to the City and to South Florida Water Management District that the project area will be a unit of the Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, excluding permits for infrastructure improvements, all criteria required by law to assess, operate, 20 �'Q)�_ • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order and maintain said unit must be confirmed in writing to the City by Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District. 39. The applicant shall comply with all Federal EPA and State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection NPDES permit requirements, including but not limited to, preparation of a stormwater pollution prevention plan and identification of appropriate Best Management Practices (BMP) for construction activities, submission of a Notice of Intent to EPA or their designee, implementation of the approved plan, inspection and maintenance of controls during construction, and submission of a storm water Notice of Termination. 40. The applicant shall diligently process its application to SFWMD (SFWMD #990129 -8) for a water use permit to withdraw, via pump, 10.4 MGD Maximum Daily Flow (MDF) from the C -18 Canal/Loxahatchee Slough into the project lakes. This application shall be consistent with (1) the water use permit issued to SUA (SFWMD #50- 00365 -W) to increase the allocation for the Hood Road Wellfield from 10.4 MGD Average Annual Daily Flow (AADF) and (2) the augmentation of groundwater /wellfield recharge. 41. The construction, operation and/or maintenance of any elements of the subject project shall not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage of surrounding areas including but not limited to East Pointe, Old Marsh, Hood Road, PGA Boulevard, and 21 �; U3 Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order the Turnpike. If, at any time during project development it is determined by the City that any of the surrounding areas are experiencing negative drainage impacts caused by the project, it shall be the developers responsibility to cure said impacts in a period of time and in a manner acceptable to the City. 42. Until such time as a water use permit for a minimum rate of 7.0 MGD MDF, or such lessor amount agreed to by the applicant, SFWMD, City Engineer and SUA, is issued to the Applicant by SFWMD to provide water from the C- 18 /Loxahatchee Slough (the "Water Use Permit ") to the project, the existing east/west canal or an approved equivalent alternate gravity conveyance acceptable to SFWMD and the City (the "Gravity System "), shall remain in service as a recharge facility to SUA's Hood Road wellfield. 43. Any temporary construction associated with phasing the proposed surface water management system improvements shall be undertaken so as not to impact native vegetation in designated buffer areas, preserve areas, and parkway areas. 44. All areas designated for maintenance of the surface water management system shall be no less than 20, wide (minimum) with graded slopes no steeper than 8:1 (horizontal: vertical), or as may be otherwise required by the Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District. No construction or landscaping shall be permitted in the 22 • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order maintenance areas that will in any way restrict, impede, or otherwise limit the use of these areas for their intended purpose. 45. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, excluding permits for infrastructure improvements, the applicant shall provide surety acceptable to the City in the amount of 110% of the estimated cost of constructing the surface water management system included in the South Florida Water Management District Conceptual Environmental Resource permit for this project. 46. Prior to issuance of building permits for construction of residential homes, golf club • facilities and/or commercial areas, a contract shall be let and a notice to proceed shall be issued by the applicant for construction of that portion of the surface water management system such that legal positive drainage, required levels of service, and performance standards for flood protection in accordance with the City's codes and ordinances are achieved so that in the event the project is temporarily delayed or permanently discontinued, the partially constructed system will meet all required surface water management system levels of service and performance standards. No Certificates of Occupancy will be issued until the approved phased portion of the Surface Water Management System has been completed, certified by the engineer of record, and determined acceptable by the City Engineer, Northern Palm Beach County Improvement • District (NPBCID), and SFWMD. 23 r' 0- i! u , • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 47. No construction/land alteration shall occur until a environmental resource permit for construction and operation of the water management system, or portions thereof are issued by SFWMD and approved by the City. 48. If necessary and beneficial, as determined by the City, the Applicant and/or NPBCID shall implement the "Isolated Lake Plan" contained in the conceptual ERP and shown on the attached exhibit entitled 1999 Conceptual Water Management Plan Revision #9 and dated 3 -27 -00 when directed by the City Engineer. 49. The water management system shall be designed to accommodate and accept a minimum of 8.1 cfs of discharge from the Turnpike drainage system into the Golf Digest project until such time as an alternative discharge route is available outside the project (to be provided by others) or a discharge is not necessary as determined by the City Engineer, and subject to Condition No. 40. Additionally, the conveyance system will gate off flows into the Turnpike ditches when water levels exceed 15.0' NGVD or as otherwise set forth in an operational schedule to be formulated by the City, SUA and NPBCID and as permitted by SFWMD. The gated structure will be operated by NPBCID. If necessary, as determined by the City Engineer, a pump shall be installed by the applicant and/or HPBCID to accept the Turnpike discharge. 24 Cl�uv Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 50. The water management system shall continue to be analyzed and designed using a dynamic analysis acceptable to the City, accounting for piping systems and flood routing in order to establish minimum road, berm and finished floor elevations. These elevations shall be documented in tabular form including sub -basin number and master plan parcel identification on the drainage plans approved by the City. Water surface elevations determined from the dynamic model analysis shall prevail and supersede those contained in the SFWMD conceptual Environmental Resource Permit. Water and Sewer 51. The existing 10" SUA PVC reclaimed water main, located in the PGA Blvd. Right-of- way, shall be relocated concurrent with the project's PGA Boulevard improvements. The location of the main shall be coordinated with the City Forester, prior to final approval of the construction plans, to avoid conflicts, where possible, with landscaping. 52. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, excluding Infrastructure improvements, golf course maintenance facility, sales center, gatehouse, entry features, Applicant shall provide documents satisfactory to the City and Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA) that modifies Condition number 30 in the conceptual South Florida Water Management District ( SFWMD) permit and Condition #9 in the COE Permit such that it clearly allows SUA the right to access, operate, maintain and repair the utility lines in the area known as Nursery Lane without having to obtain any additional permits to work in and/or disturb 0 25 CUc� • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order designated preservation areas; reference Application drawing number 41- 2 -32 -21 as prepared by Mock -Roos and dated September, 1999. 53. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, excluding infrastructure improvements, golf course maintenance facility, temporary sales center (no permanent construction), gatehouse, entry features (landscape, project identification walls and the like), the applicant shall conclude arrangements satisfactory to the developer, SUA and the City that provide an easement or right -of -way for the construction and operation and access for maintenance and repair of a transmission main from the Northwest corner of the SUA WWTP site to Hood Road. 54. NPBCID Plan of Improvement for this project shall include all elements of the master surface water management system including but not limited to the mitigation plan, isolated lake plan and turnpike pumping station. Said plan of improvements meeting this requirement and adopted by NPBCID shall be supplied to the City prior to issuing the 1St building permit, excluding infrastructure improvements. 55. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, excluding infrastructure improvements, golf course maintenance facility, sales center, gatehouse and entry features, applicant shall (1) modify the conceptual ERP to include acceptance of drainage from the SUA WWTP site • including wet weather discharge from the percolation ponds and provide assurance 26 e r �; o3 . Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order acceptable to the City that the existing conditions of drainage for the `Bonnett Property" and Hood Road is not negatively impacted by the development of the project. (4) Relocate the existing SUA perimeter landscaping or implement an alternative landscape plan acceptable to the City and (5) Provide resolution of drainage for the `Bonnett Property" and Hood Road that is satisfactory to the City and doesn't worsen the existing Conditions. 56. Upon receipt of all necessary approvals (the cost of which shall be born by Golf Digest as a "cost to cure ") the applicant shall construct a water control structure for the SUA WWTP and fill the SUA WWTP site to a minimum elevation of 17.5 NGVD or as otherwise determined from the dynamic model and relocated the existin g SUA WWTP perimeter landscaping or implement an alternative landscape plan acceptable to the City prior to acceptance of the surface water management system, or any portion thereof, by NPBCID and the City. 57. The access road to SUA treatment plant site shall be designed to local road specifications with a minimum crown of road to be at a level of flood protection consistent with a 25 year, one day storm. is 27 • • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 58. The applicant and/or NPBCID shall furnish and install continuous lake stage recorders including telemetry equipment meeting NPBCID guidelines. In addition, the stage recorders and telemetry equipment shall be configured such that the City shall have the capability to install separate transmitters to monitor lake stages. Installation shall be concurrent with the acceptance of the water management system by NPBCID for all, or any portion of the system. The locations and number of stage recorders shall be in accordance with a monitoring plan mutually acceptable to the City and NPBCID. 59. Prior to the City's acceptance of the dynamic model of the surface water management system, the drainage areas (1) stated in the SFWMD conceptual environmental resource permit, (2) as shown on the 1999 Conceptual Water Management Plan, Revision #9 and dated 3- 28 -00, and (3) included in the Conceptual Water Management Calculations must be reconciled to the satisfaction of the SFWMD and the City. Public Safety 60. The applicant and/or its successor and assigns shall provide on -site private security until the roadways are completed to deter construction theft. 61. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles established through cooperation with the City's Crime Prevention Division shall be utilized during the site planning of the development parcels. Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 62. The applicant and/or its successor and assigns shall provide a stabilized road base, subject to City standards, for fire /emergency access to each development parcel prior to the start of construction within said parcel. Disclosure 63. Pursuant to School Board requirements, a sign shall be posted in all sales offices /model homes which provides notice of annual school boundary assignments for students of this project. This 11 "x17" notice shall be provided by the School Board. 64. A prominent statement, such as the one shown below, shall be included in sales and marketing materials and property owners association documents: Golf Digest (or specific property location) is located within 4.5 miles of North County Airport, a general aviation reliever airport. Airplanes operating to, from and/or near North County Airport will be noticeable and airplane noise may be objectionable. 65. A disclosure shall be included in sales and marketing materials and property owners association documents which identifies that the N -S Parkway and E -W Parkway will be dedicated to Palm Beach County in the future, and that these thoroughfares have the potential of becoming six -lane facilities. 66. Disclosure shall be provided to all potential home buyers and a statement shall be • contained in all property owners association documents and initial sales documents which 29 �. • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order identifies the proximity of the Seacoast Utility Authority Wastewater Treatment Facility and the potential odors that may be emitted therefrom. 67. A prominent statement acceptable to the City shall be recorded into the public records of Palm Beach County and contained in all property owners association documents and sales documents which identifies that the levels of all water bodies in the surface water management system may fluctuate dramatically during very wet or very dry periods and that the priority purpose of these water bodies is to fulfill surface water management, not aesthetics. • Performance Standards 68. The golf course(s) shall be designed and constructed by a nationally - recognized golf entity for the first five (5) years of operation, and maintained at the direction of a head golf professional who shall be a class A member of the Professional Golfer's Association of America or other national certification of equal value, who shall have at least five (5) years of experience in the Southern region. The golf management services /administration personnel shall include professional turf consultants, entomologists, plant biologists and such other professional specialists required to care and maintain the course(s). 69. Prior to the issuance of the first residential building permit, the master property owners . association documents and restrictions shall be furnished by the applicant to the City 30 ecir, Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order Attorney for review and approval prior to such documents being recorded in the Public Records of Palm Beach County. Buildout 70. Consistent with Chapter 118 -46, recordation of all plats, installation of all infrastructure, common area improvements and landscaping, and dedication of facilities, rights -of -way and easements shall be completed prior to December 31, 2004. Time extensions are subject to the criteria set forth in Chapter 118 of the City's Land Development Regulations, and any time extension request shall include a Traffic Impact Analysis to identify additional roadway improvements which may be required to extend the buildout of the project. Additional roadway improvements, if any, shall be incorporated into the Development Order. Monitoring 71. An annual report shall be submitted to the Growth Management Department by February Fourteenth of each year, until the project has reached buildout, that describes the project's current status and compares its progress with the provisions of the development order. • 31 �' 3 Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order SECTION 5. Construction of the Planned Community District shall be in compliance with the following plans on file with the City's Growth Management Department: 1. May 4, 2000 Master Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 2. May 4, 2000 Common Area Phasing Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 3. May 4, 2000 Development Phasing Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 4. January 21, 1997 Hood Road Perimeter Buffer, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 5. May 20, 1998 Littoral Planting Adjacent to Selected Areas, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 6. April 11, 2000 North -South Parkway System, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 7. October 13, 1999 PGA Boulevard & East West Parkway System, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 8. November 15, 1999 Roadway /Access Easement Sections, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 9. May 4, 2000 Roadway / Buffer Section Location Map, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 10. (A) October 13, 1999 Roadway / Buffer S ections -- Section A -Al', A -A2' & B -B', Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet (B) October 13, 1999 Roadway / Buffer Sections -- Section C -C' & D -D', Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet (C) October 13, 1999 Roadway / Buffer Sections -- Section E -E' & F -F, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet (D) November 15, 1999 Roadway / Buffer Sections -- Section G -G', H -H' & I -I', Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet (E) September 24, 1998 Roadway/Buffer Section - East -West & North -South Parkway 4 Lane Ultimate ROW, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 11. September 29, 1997 Seacoast Utility Site Buffer (Scheme A &B), Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 12. May 4, 2000 Sidewalk Location Map, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 13. January 21, 1997 Turnpike / Reservoir Buffer & 25' Wetland Buffer Adjacent to Residential, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 14. June 17, 1998 Water and Wastewater Master Plan for Golf Digest, Carnahan - Proctor and Associates, 5 Sheets 15. August 19, 1998 Eastern Retained Property Conceptual Water Management Plan, Higgins Engineering, Inc., 3 Sheets 16. July, 1998, as revised July 30, 1998, September 2, 1998, and by the October 7, 1998 `growth rates revision' letter to Dan Weisberg from Joseph Pollock„ Jr. Traffic Impact Analysis - Golf Digest - Palm Beach Gardens, Kimley -Horn and Associates, Inc., 46 Pages. 17. September 11, 1998 Conceptual 15 Acre Park Development Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet. 18. July 12, 1999 Typical Residential Buffer Plan (40' Parkway & 15' Buffer), Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheets. 19. July 12, 1999 Typical Residential Buffer Section (40' Parkway & 15' Buffer), Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheets. 32 C �? 4 • LJ • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 20. October 14, 1998 Typical Residential Buffer Elevation (40' Parkway & 15' Buffer), Urban Design Studio, 1 sheet. 21. October 13, 1999 Typical Parkway 4 lane Ultimate R -O -W Section, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet. 22. September, 1999 Typical Maintenance Pathway Section, Mark Roos and Associates, Sheet 3 of 3. Other supporting materials which provide additional back -up, data and analysis and/or justification for the aforementioned materials, and petition in general, include: 22. March 1996 AERIAL, 7 Sheets 23. March 11, 1996 TOPO, Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc., 1 Sheet 24. August 31, 1996 Boundary Survey, Mock.Roos, Engineers. Surveyors. Planners, 2 Sheets 25. November 21, 1996 Seacoast Utilities Hood Road Wellfield Location Map, Howard L. Searcy Consulting Engineers, Inc., 1 Sheet 26. October 1996 Preliminary Market Overview, Cotton & Company, 7 pages +August 1996, Palm Beach County Market Study, WCI Communities, 40 Pages 27. July 13, 1995 Option Agreement For Sale And Purchase, Between John D. MacArthur Foundation and The Nature Conservancy, 5 Pages 28. October 10, 1996 Mitigation Agreement, Board of County Commissions, 10 Pages 29. May 20, 1996 Application Form of Golf Digest- Loxahatchee Slough, WCI Communities Limited Partnership, 4 Pages 30. November, 1996 Application for Alternation of Environmentally Significant Lands Environmental Assessment, Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc., 15 Pages + Map A Site Location Map, Higgins Engineering, Inc., 1 Sheet Map B Aerial Photography, 1 Sheet Map C Existing Terrestrial And Aquatic Vegetation. Map D Preservation Plan, 1 Sheet Map E USDA/SCS Soils Map, Higgins Engineering, Inc., 3 Sheets 31. December 19, 1996 Environmental Assessment Response to Sufficiency Review / Palm Beach Gardens, Kevin L. Erwin consulting Ecologist, Inc., 26 Pages 32. January 3, 1997 Environmental Assessment- Response to Sufficiency Review / Palm Beach Gardens, Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc., 26 pages 33. January 24, 1997 Environmental Assessment - Sufficiency Review, Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc. 4 Pages 34. January 28, 1997 received by City of P.B.G., Environmental Assessment Transparent Overlays, Urban Design Studio, 28 Sheets 35. April 30, 1997 Environmental Review of the Proposed Golf Digest PCD, James F. Schnelle, JR., PE, 14 Pages 33 G CC'5 Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order 36. March 28, 1995 South Florida Water Management District Jurisdictional Determination for Parcels 18 and 30 of the MacArthur Foundation & Vegetation Map, Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc., 11 Sheets 37. September 30, 1996 Eastern Retained Property Conceptual Water Management Plan &. Details, Howard L. Searcy Consulting Engineers, Fazio Golf Course Designers, Edward D.Stone and Associates & Higgins Engineering, Inc., 3 Sheets 38. November 1996 Eastern Retained Property Topographic Map And Predevelopment Drainage Map, Higgins Engineering, Inc., 1 Sheet 39. December 1996 Conceptual Surface Water Management Calculations, Howard L. Searcy Consulting Engineers, 45 Pages 40. December 1996 Water Budget Model Analysis, Tornasello Consulting Engineers, Inc., 12 Pages 41. December 20, 1996 Interim Report Water Level Monitoring Results, Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing, Inc., 5 Pages 42. March 14, 1997 Eastern Retained Property Conceptual Water Management Plan &. Details, Howard L. Searcy Consulting Engineers, Fazio Golf Course Designers, Inc. & Edward D. Stone, Jr. and Associates Planners and Landscape Architects, 3 Sheets 43. November 1, 1996 Eastern Retained Property Relative Wetland Quality Map, Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc., 1 Sheet 44. November 12, 1996 Eastern retained Property Refined Plan Wetland Impact Analysis, Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc., 1 Sheet 45. January 8, 1997 Loxahatchee Slough, Higgins Engineering, Inc., 26 Pages 46. January 28, 1997 received by City of P.B.G., Eastern Retained Property Refined Plan Wetland Impact Analysis By FLUCFCS, 4 Pages 47. March 18, 1997 received by City of P.B.G., Eastern Retained Property Project Wetland (WL) And Other Surface Water (SW) Summary, 8 Pages 48. January 17, 1997 Eastern Retained Property Vegetation And Listed Wildlife Species Map, Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc., 1 Sheet 49. March 18, 1997 received by City of P.B.G. Coverage By Exotic Species Within The Eastern Retained Property, The Loxahatchee Slough, the Eastern Retained Parcel and Loxahatchee Slough, 5 Pages 50. March 16, 1995 U.S. Corps of Engineers Jurisdictional Determination for Parcels 18 and 30 of the MacArthur Foundation ( Deter. No. 199501610) & Vegetation Map, Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc., 11 Sheets 51. November 11, 1996 Mitigation Areas Map, Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc., 1 Sheet 52. November 12, 1996 Eastern Retained Property Site And Preservation Plan, Kevin L. Erwin Consulting Ecologist, Inc., 1 Sheet 53. June 22, 1999 PGA Boulevard Roadway Sections, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet. 54. August 2, 1999 Typical Parkway Buffer, Water Management Tract Adjacent to Preserve or Golf Course and Commercial Parcels, Krent Wieland Design, Inc., 1 Sheet. 55. August 2, 1999Typical Parkway Buffer, Water Management Tract adjacent to Residential 34 n ,� Qt1,�v • LJ Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order Parcel, Krent Wieland Design, Inc., 1 Sheet. 56. October 28, 1999 Parkway Buffer, Water Management Tract Adjacent to Turnpike (4 sheets), Krent Wieland Design, Inc., 1 Sheet. 57. Golf Digest 1999 Conceptual Water Management Plan and Details (3 sheets), Higgins Engineering, Inc, Sheet 1 dated December 8, 1999, Sheet 2 dated November 22, 1999, Sheet 3 dated December 16, 1999. SECTION 6. The final approval of any on -site and/or off -site plans for improvements shall require the applicant to deposit with the City Manager surety in the amount prescribed by the City, in accordance with industry standards for the purposes of assuring the completion of all improvements including on -site roadways, drainage, utility improvements, common area landscaping/buffer and entry features. The required documentation thereof shall be in requisite form and approved by the City Manager. The executed mylar of a plat shall not be accepted until the required bond, letter of credit or deposit is filed with and approved by the City Manager in accordance with industry standards. The amount of the surety shall be in an amount to be determined by the City Engineer and City Forester to be sufficient to assure completion of the required improvements. From time to time, as improvements are completed and approved by the City of Palm Beach Gardens, the City Manager may reduce the amount of the surety by a proportionate amount. SECTION 7. If any part or portion of this Ordinance is found to be void or defective, the remainder of the Ordinance shall continue in full force and effect. SECTION 8. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby 35 Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order repealed. SECTION 9. This Ordinance shall be effective upon adoption. PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS ( I "tA DAY OF �p '2000. PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS DAY OF , 2000. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 52000 MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO VICE MAYOR LAUREN FURTADO ATTEST: CAROL GOLD, CMC, CITY CLERK eTA • 36 COUNCILMAN ERIC JABLIN COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK COUNCILMAN CARL SABATELLO APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY. CITY ATTORNEY r0Z" U • Ordinance 8, 2000 Golf Digest Development Order VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR FURTADO COUNCILMAN JABLIN COUNCILMAN CLARK COUNCILMAN SABATELLO 37 • • I A 4t�- rD&� CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum 8 Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 28, 2000 SUBJECT /AGENDA ITEM: PUD 99 -02 Second Reading /Public Hearing: Ordinance 14, 2000, a request to amend the Master Plan for the Admiralty II Planned Unit Development (PUD) to increase the square footage of the approved second phase office building from 82,265 to 82,389, reduce its height from 10 stories to 5 stories, and add an optional third floor to the approved parking structure. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 14, 2000, with conditions. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ Council Action: Total City Attorney Growth Management [ ] Approved Finance NA ,,, r $ [ ] Approved w/ �(,�J Current FY conditions ACM [ ]Denied Human Res. NA Advertised: Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Attachments: Other NA Date: [ ] Operating Paper: [ ] Other • Ordinance 14, 2000 • Site plan • Landscape plan • Sign elevation • Feb. 29, March 10 waiver justifications • Feb. 8 waiver justification & summary • O 00 [X] Not Required Submi ed b : Gro Affected parties Budget Acct. #:: Dir [ ] Notified [ ] None Approved by: City Manager [X] Not required • • City Council Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 28, 2000 Petition PUD -99 -02 REQUEST Alfred J. Malefatto, agent for Palm Beach Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership, is requesting to amend the master plan for The Admiralty planned unit development (PUD). The 12.5 -acre site currently contains an 82,265 square -foot office building, a parking structure for 559 cars, a hotel containing 160 units, an 8,000 square foot restaurant with 200 seats, and an 814 square -foot mechanical building. The second phase of the site, which consisted of an additional 82,265 square feet of office and another parking structure for 229 cars, has not yet been built. This amendment proposes to increase the square footage of the approved office building from 82,265 square feet to 82,389 square feet ( +124 s.f.), reduce its height from 10 stories to 5 stories, and permit the approved parking structure to have an additional story (for a total of three stories). The site is located on the southwest corner of PGA Boulevard and Interstate Highway 95. (12- 42S -42E) BACKGROUND The PUD, known as the "Admiralty Il," was created by Ordinance 15, 1987, and subsequently amended, most recently by Ordinance 26, 1996 on February 6, 1997. The Admiralty II PUD was approved for 164,530 square feet of office, a 162 -room hotel, 4,300 square feet of retail, 8,000 square feet of restaurant, and a 3,600 square -foot bank. The development is completed except for the Phase 2 office tower and 2 -story parking garage. The currently approved site plan for the Phase 2 office tower shows a 10 -story structure. As shown on the site plan, a 5 -story building is now planned with a slight square footage increase from the previous approval (from 82,265 square feet to 82,389 square feet). Some architectural details for the proposed tower are similar to those on the existing buildings. The primary color and material scheme for the proposed tower will match that of the existing buildings. The floor plate and architectural styling, however, have been modernized. This applicant originally requested only a time extension, but later expanded the request to include the changes described above. LAND USE AND ZONING The subject site is zoned General Commercial (CG -1) with a PUD overlay, has a future land use designation of Commercial (C), and is listed as Commercial (C) on the Vision Plan. For a complete listing of adjacent uses, land use designations and zoning districts, see Table 1 (attached). Table 2 examines how consistent the proposed project is with the City Code and future land use designation for the site. 2 . City Council Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 28, 2000 Petition PUD -99 -02 CONCURRENCY The proposed project received concurrency certification on September 27, 1999, which included concurrency for traffic, drainage, solid waste, sewer and water. PROCEDURE This is a request to amend an approved PUD. The request is reviewed by the Development Review Committee (DRC), who forwards comments and recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Acting in an advisory role, the Commission considers the recommendations of the DRC and City Staff and makes a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council reviews the request for an amendment to an approved PUD, and makes a final determination of approval, approval with conditions, or denial. PROJECT DETAILS Building Site The 12.5 -acre site currently contains Phase 1 of The Admiralty project, consisting of a 10- • story office building with a drive - through bank, an Embassy Suites hotel, a restaurant, and a parking structure. The second phase of the site has not yet been built. The applicant proposes to increase the square footage of the approved office building from 82,265 square feet to 82,389 square feet (an increase of 124 square feet), decrease the height, and permit the approved parking structure to have an optional additional story (for a total of three stories). Site Access The site has an ingress /egress along PGA Boulevard, which will be expanded to provide a right turn lane. There is also access from Military Trail via a permanent easement and road across First Union Center (formerly Admiralty). At the time of its original approval, three additional access points were mandated by the City Council, connecting the site to the Tanglewood Apartment site to the south. The original development order (Ordinance 15, 1987) contains a condition stating: "The parking garages shall be constructed to have both exit and entrance lanes on the south side facing Tanglewood Planned Unit Development. The said garage openings shall be chained off from use and remain in such status until the City Council shall by Resolution direct otherwise." Two of the access points have been built, including a narrow road west of the parking garage (egress only -into Tanglewood) and an access point through the existing parking garage. The • garage access is currently chained off. 3 2­1 • City Council Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 28, 2000 Petition PUD -99 -02 The applicant has requested that the two garage access points be eliminated. (The owner of Tanglewood wants all three access points to be removed.) The Planning staff and the City Engineer are amenable to the removal of the garage access points if the petitioner will agree to preserving the ground link and to expanding it to accommodate two -way vehicular traffic in the future at the discretion of the City. The City would also like to see the lane widened and striped or otherwise clearly marked for safe pedestrian and bicycle use. It should be noted that this property is within the PGA Corridor Overlay (see discussion below) and one of the Overlay principles is that "Neighboring properties are encouraged to link their parking lots together and to share common driveways." The City Engineer has consulted with the City's traffic consultant on this matter. His recommendation is that the existing and proposed garage access points could be eliminated. The westernmost (ground level) access point, however, should not only remain but should be expanded to accommodate two -way vehicle movement. Signage • Ground Signs: The site has approximately 1,539 feet of public road right -of -way frontage; therefore the site can have up to 2 ground signs. The site already contains one ground sign with four tenants, and they are proposing a second ground sign with three tenants. Four tenants on one sign would not be allowed by today's code, but since a specific approval was granted for it (Resolution 145, 1994) it is a valid nonconformity which can remain. The proposed ground sign meets code. • Wall Signs- Existing: This property also contains a number of wall signs. The City approved a signage program for this entire property via Resolution 61, 1988, and most of the existing signs conform to that plan. An apparent exception is the sign on the existing office building. Resolution 61, 1988 calls for this sign to be no higher than the second floor, but today it is above the tenth floor. Unless the applicant can establish that the City approved this change, this sign would be considered illegal, and would have to be removed. Another option is for the applicant to request a waiver as part of this application for this sign, which they have now done. Mr. Jack Hanson, the City's Building Official, is certain that the relocation of the sign to the 10th floor was properly permitted, although he cannot find the documentation. • Wall Signs- Proposed: The proposed building exhibits two signs. On the north facade is a sign at the fifth floor level. Under today's code this sign could be no higher than the fourth floor line. The approved signage program allowed a sign at the tenth floor level for this building, but since the proposed sign is in a different location the previous approval is not valid for it. Therefore the applicant has requested a waiver for this sign. 4 C1 =3 • City Council Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 28, 2000 Petition PUD -99 -02 The applicant is also proposing a fifth floor sign on the south facade of this building. The approved signage plan allows only a second floor tenant identifier sign at this location, and today's sign code also allows only a second floor -level wall sign. Therefore this sign cannot be approved unless by waiver, which the applicant has requested. PGA Boulevard Corridor Overlay This project falls within the PGA Corridor Overlay District. The project complies with the landscape and open space guidelines of the Overlay. The building design guidelines of the Overlay call for new buildings in existing complexes to "have a unity of character and design." Other guidelines suggest seeking "visual order through the consistent use of compatible color palettes ", and require that all building elevations receive equal architectural treatment. It should be noted that the Overlay requires that all new, relocated, or reconstructed utilities be placed underground. Phasinq All of Phase 2 will be built at once, except that the applicant may not add the (optional) third level onto the parking garage until later. See "Parking" below for discussion. • Parkinq It should be noted that the City is in the process of revising its Land Development Regulations, and that this project will be subject to these new regulations. One of the proposed changes subjects projects which request parking above code requirements to special processing. Any request for a parking increase of more than 10% over required parking requires a waiver from the City Council. The need for the additional parking must be justified. This project requires such a waiver for its additional parking request. The required number of parking spaces in Phase 2 is 275 (1 space /300 s.f.). The proposed parking structure would contain 297 at two stories (8% over required) and 433 at three stories (58% over required). The applicant has requested a waiver request for the additional parking, and has provided a justification (attached). Leqal Nonconformities As noted earlier in the "Signage" section, the existing ground sign with four tenant names is a legal nonconformity because it would not meet today's code but received specific approval by the City. Waivers . The applicant initially requested several waivers, including: 5 • City Council Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 28, 2000 Petition PUD -99 -02 1. Specialty pavers, currently not allowed by right. 2. 9' parking spaces in place of the standard 10' spaces 3. Number of loading spaces; code requires 3 for this use, applicant is proposing 2 4. PUD setback: on south side, code requires 20' setback. Applicant is requesting a waiver to match the existing garage's 15' setback 5. Elimination of 6' wall: on south side, code requires a 6' wall separating commercial from residential. Applicant feels that the parking garage in effect acts as 6' wall 6. Number of flagpoles; code allows three but four already exist 7. Timing of platting; code requires platting prior to C.O., which is acceptable to applicant. However code is being revised to require platting prior to building permit, which applicant does not want. Waiver filed as a precaution in case code is changed before their final approval 8. Signage on north side of proposed building; code limits to fourth floor line, but applicant wants sign at top, which is above the fifth floor As the project has developed, the applicant has added two additional waivers: 9. Signage on existing office building; according to this project's approved signage plan, this building was to have a sign at the second floor level. Today the sign is above the tenth floor 10. Signage on south side of proposed building; code limits to second floor line, but applicant wants sign at top, which is above the fifth floor The applicant has also requested a waiver for having over 10% more parking than their use requires, as discussed earlier in this report. DRC COMMENTS (meeting held January 27, 2000) Planninq Division The Planning Staff reviewed this petition and offered the following comments: 1. This application started as a time extension, but that request has now been incorporated into the PUD amendment request. 2. The sign colors on the new building should match the sign colors on the existing buildings. 3. The old conditions of approval from past approvals are being reviewed and will be updated, deleted, or carried forward as appropriate. 4. Staff will evaluate the applicant's request to close all access points between Admiralty and Tanglewood and offer a recommendation at a later date. cis, City Council Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 28, 2000 Petition PUD -99 -02 5. Phase 1 of this project did not have enough parking to meet code, and utilized a shared parking study. Due to parking and possible traffic concerns, Phase 2 may have a prohibition on medical office use. Police See attachment dated February 4, 2000. City Engineer No major concerns. See attached memos of December 17, 1999, January 26, 2000, and March 9, 2000. It should be noted that the City Engineer does not support removing all of the connections to Tanglewood PUD. Seacoast Utility Authority Several requests; see attached letter of December 15, 1999. The following agencies have offered no comments or concerns on this project. City Attorney, Public Works, Code Enforcement, Parks and Recreation, Public Information, Solid Waste Authority, Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District, School Board, City Environmental Consultant, Fire Marshal. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION This project was reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission as a workshop on February 22, 2000. No major concerns were raised by the Commission, and staff was directed to prepare the application for a public hearing. On March 14, 2000 this application was heard in a public hearing after due public notice. Discussion focussed on the project signage. Finally it was resolved that the petitioner would not seek specific signage approval with this application, but would return later with a petition for approval of their sign package. They did ask the Commission for a recommendation of approval on their requested signage locations, however. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of this application, subject to staffs recommended conditions of approval. Their recommendation included approval of the requested waivers, except for the applicant's request to be able to plat prior to C.O. rather that building permit. The Commission recommended to Council that only the westernmost (ground) vehicular connection should be maintained between this property and Tanglewood. Finally, the Commission recommended that a new condition of approval be added requiring that the applicant come back to the City for approval of City Council Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 28, 2000 Petition PUD -99 -02 their detailed signage package at a later date, although the locations of the signs were approved as a part of this petition. CITY COUNCIL FIRST READING This project was reviewed by the City Council as a first reading on April 17, 2000. Discussion centered around access and circulation issues. Councilman Sabatello requested that the City Engineer and the project engineer take another look at the entrance to the project from PGA Boulevard to see if internal circulation can be improved. The cross access point with Tanglewood was debated; most council members favored the elimination of the garage access points if the petitioner would widen the ground level connection west of the garage to two -way. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of PUD- 99 -02, subject to the following conditions: 1. All conditions of approval from all previous ordinances and resolutions relating to this PUD are still in full force and effect unless specifically modified or deleted herein. • (Development Compliance) 2. The sign colors on the new building should match the sign colors on the existing office building (dark bronze). (Development Compliance) 3. No medical or dental office use shall be allowed in this project. (Planning) 4. Within three months of final approval, the applicant shall remove all exotic vegetation from Phase 2. The area shall be graded, sodded or sown with grass seed, and maintained until the commencement of construction. (City Forester) 5. The applicant shall be responsible for maintenance of the landscaping along PGA Boulevard and the 1 -95 on -ramp. (Public Works) 6. The applicant shall revise the plans and site data to account for the proposed ground connection between the garages and the subsequent loss of parking. (Planning) 7. This project shall be platted prior to the issuance of a building permit. Engineering, Planning) 8. This project shall return to the Planning & Zoning Commission and City Council as a miscellaneous petition for the approval of the text of its signage. (Planning) 9. The vehicular connection points in the parking garages between this project and Tanglewood may be eliminated. The existing ground level vehicular connection point west of the parking garage shall be expanded to allow two -way vehicular traffic, including proper signage and pavement marking to foster safe pedestrian and bicycle use, at the request of the City. (Engineering, Planning) 10. This project's buildout date is December 31, 2001, as referenced in the traffic impact analysis. For purposes of this condition, the project shall be considered built out if all 8 C�Uf City Council Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 28, 2000 Petition PUD -99 -02 building permits have been issued and the applicant is actively engaged in the development of the site. (Development Compliance) WAIVERS Based upon staff analysis of the project's circumstances and the applicant's justification statements, staff also recommends the approval of waivers 1 -6 and 8 -11: 1. Specialty pavers, currently not allowed by right. 2. 9' parking spaces in place of the standard 10' spaces 3. Number of loading spaces; code requires 3 for this use, applicant is proposing 2 4. PUD setback: on south side, code requires 20' setback. Applicant is requesting a waiver because the existing garage has a 15' setback 5. Elimination of 6' wall: on south side, code requires a 6' wall separating commercial from residential. Applicant feels that the parking garage in effect acts as 6' wall 6. Number of flagpoles; code allows three but four already exist 7. Timing of platting; code requires platting prior to C.O., which is acceptable to applicant. However code is being revised to require platting prior to building permit, which applicant does not want. Waiver filed as a precaution in case code is changed before their final approval THIS WAIVER REQUEST HAS BEEN WITHDRAWN 8. Signage on north side of proposed building; code limits to fourth floor line, but applicant wants sign at top, which is above the fifth floor 9. Signage on existing office building; according to this project's approved signage plan, this building was to have a sign at the second floor level. Today the sign is above the tenth floor 10. Signage on south side of proposed building; code limits to second floor line, but applicant wants sign at top, which is above the fifth floor 11. The applicant has requested a waiver for having over 10% more parking than their use requires by code. OUTSTANDING ISSUES As of this writing, all significant outstanding issues on this petition have been resolved. W Cl�6 • • • City Council Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 28, 2000 Petition PUD -99 -02 ,W.r.;....,.«. .,.aF.•.« Subject Property_ CG -1 /PUD: General Admiralty 11 Commercial (with a Commercial Planned Unit Development (C) Overlay) North CG -1 /PUD: General DoubleTree Hotel Commercial (with a Commercial Planned Unit Development (C) Overlay) South RH /PUD: Residential — Residential — High Density Tanglewood Apartments High Density (with a Planned Unit Development Overlay) West CG -1: General Admiralty I Commercial Commercial (C) East Interstate 95 N/A N/A 10 • City Council Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 28, 2000 Petition PUD -99 -02 - fth CocieRequ� ement °� V,ProposedPlan,� Consistent Site = CG -1 /PUD Hotel and Office Yes Minimum Building Site 12.5 acres Yes Area for CG -1: 1 acre Minimum Site Width for 667 feet Yes CG -1: 100 feet Maximum Building Lot 33.57% Yes Coverage for CG -1: 35% Maximum Building Height 133 feet* Yes for CG -1: 36 feet (with previous PUD "existing approved hotel building approval) Front Setback for CG -1: Front Setback: Yes 50 feet 98 feet Side Setback for CG -1: Side Setback: Yes 15 feet 93 feet Side Setback Facing a Side Setback Facing a Yes Street for CG -1: Street: 49 feet 40 feet Rear Setback for CG -1: Rear Setback: Yes 15 feet 15 feet g /short: pud9902. cc.doc /jn 11 cli ij • • March 31, 2000 April 7, 2000 ORDINANCE 14, 2000 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION OF PALM BEACH HOTEL AND OFFICE BUILDING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR AN AMENDMENT OF A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PGA BOULEVARD AND INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 95, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, BY APPROVING AN INCREASE IN SQUARE FOOTAGE IN THE PHASE 2 OFFICE BUILDING FROM 82,265 TO 82,389 AND A REDUCTION IN HEIGHT FROM TEN STORIES TO FIVE STORIES, AND ALLOWING THE PERMITTED PHASE 2 PARKING STRUCTURE TO HAVE AN OPTIONAL THIRD FLOOR; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; PROVIDING FOR WAIVERS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Palm Beach Gardens received an application from Palm Beach Hotel and Office Building Limited Partnership for approval of an amendment to a previously approved planned unit development located at the southwest corner of PGA Boulevard and Interstate Highway 95, in order to construct an 82,389 square foot office building and add an optional third floor to the previously- approved parking structure on the 12.5 - acre site, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the 12.5 -acre "Admiralty 11" site is currently zoned General Commercial (CG -1) with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application and determined that it is sufficient; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application and determined that it is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has recommended approval of the amendment of the planned unit development (PUD) known as "Admiralty II "; and 1 17__� WHEREAS, the City's Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed said application and recommended that it be approved with certain waivers and subject to certain conditions stated herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida hereby approves an amendment to the "Admiralty II" PUD located at the southwest corner of PGA Boulevard and Interstate Highway 95, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. Said Planned Unit Development is approved subject to the following conditions which shall be the responsibility of the applicant, its successors or assigns: 1. All conditions of approval from all previous ordinances and resolutions relating to this PUD are still in full force and effect unless specifically modified or deleted herein. (Development Compliance) 2. The sign colors on the new building shall match the sign colors on the existing office building (dark bronze). (Development Compliance) 3. No medical or dental office use shall be allowed in this project. (Planning ) 4. Within three months of final approval of this development order, the applicant shall remove all exotic vegetation from Phase 2. The area shall be graded, sodded or sown with grass seed, and maintained until the commencement of construction. (City Forester) 5. The applicant shall be responsible for maintenance of the landscaping along PGA Boulevard and the 1 -95 on -ramp. (Public Works) 6. The applicant shall revise the plans and site data to account for the proposed ground connection between the garages and the subsequent loss of parking. (Planning) 7. This project shall be platted prior to the issuance of any building permit. (Engineering, Building) 8. This project shall return to the Planning & Zoning Commission and the City Council as a miscellaneous petition for the approval of the text of its signage. (Planning) 2 7_� 9. The vehicular connection points in the parking garages between this project and Tanglewood may be eliminated. The existing ground level vehicular connection point west of the parking garage shall be expanded to allow two -way vehicular traffic, including proper signage and pavement marking to foster safe pedestrian and bicycle use, at the request of the City. (Engineering, Planning) 10. This project's buildout date is December 31, 2001, as referenced in their traffic analysis. For purposes of this condition, the project shall be considered built out if all building permits have been issued and the applicant is actively engaged in the development of the site. (Development Compliance) SECTION 3. The following waivers are hereby granted with this approval: 1. Specialty pavers currently not allowed by right, to be allowed in selected areas. 2. Sec. 118 -475 (a), Parking Stall and Bay Dimensions, which requires 10' wide parking spaces, to allow 9' wide parking spaces. 3. Sec. 118- 569,Number of Loading Spaces Required, which requires three for this use, to allow two. 4. Sec. 118- 213(h), Planned Unit Development Setbacks Required, which requires 20' setback on the south side, to allow a 15' setback. 5. Sec. 118- 279(h), Yards, which requires a 6' wall or fence on the south side on south side, to eliminate this requirement along the south side of the parking garages. 6. Sec. 110 -2(b), General Regulations and Restrictions and Prohibitions, which allows a maximum of three flagpoles, to allow four. 7. Sec. 110- 37(b), Flat/wall Signs, which limits sign to below fourth floor line, to allow a sign at the top of the building, which is above the fifth floor. 8. Signage on existing office building; according to this project's approved signage plan, this building was to have a sign at the second floor level. Today the sign is above the tenth floor 9. Sec. 110- 37(c), Flat/wall Signs, which limits occupant with space directly accessible from ground level to a sign no higher than second floor line, to allow a sign at top of the building, which is above the fifth floor. 10. Sec. 140(d)(1) (new code) Required Parking, which limits C1 13 0 applicants to a maximum of 10% over code required parking, to allow up to 58% over code required parking for Phase 2. SECTION 4. Construction of the Planned Unit Development shall be in compliance with the following plans on file with the City's Growth Management Department: 1. May 10, 2000 Site Plan, Oliver Glidden & Partners, (1 sheet) 2. February 21, 2000 Floor Plans & Sections, Oliver Glidden & Partners, (1 sheet) 3. March 10, 2000 Roof & Garage Plan, Oliver Glidden & Partners, (1 sheet) 4. February 21, 2000 Elevations, North /South /East/West, Oliver Glidden & Partners, (1 sheet) 5. February 21, 2000 Garage Roof Plan & Elevations, Oliver Glidden & Partners, (2 sheets) 6. February 21, 2000 Photometric Plan, Oliver Glidden & Partners, (1 sheet) 7. May 11, 2000 Landscape Plans, Environmental Design Group, (2 sheets) 8. May 11, 2000 Plant List & Details, Environmental Design Group, (1 sheet) 9. March 24, 1999 Topographic Map, Robert E. Owen & Associates, (1 sheet) 10. January 20, 1999 Boundary Survey, Robert E. Owen & Associates, (1 sheet) 11. May 10, 2000 Paving Grading & Drainage Plan, Messier & Associates, (1 sheet) 12. May 10, 2000 Water Distribution & Sanitary Sewer Systems Plan, Messier & Associates, (1 sheet) SECTION 5. If any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holding shall not affect the remainder of the Ordinance. SECTION 6. All ordinances or parts of ordinances of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, which are in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 7. This Ordinance shall be effective upon adoption. • r� PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS 17th DAY OF April 2000. PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS DAY OF 200 . PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 200_. MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO VICE MAYOR ERIC JABLIN 0 COUNCILWOMAN LAUREN FURTADO COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK COUNCILMAN CARL SABATELLO ATTEST BY: CAROL GOLD CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY BY: CITY ATTORNEY • • VOTE: AYE MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR JABLIN COUNCILWOMAN FURTADO COUNCILMAN CLARK COUNCILMAN SABATELLO • • NAY ABSENT CIC D MILITARY TRAIL , I � , A 7� 4 if Hill, 1 t T ' r � • I � ` •, � � rya o � ,1rc • ./ i 14 L' CC T9€IM T11-❑I (1--n _ _ r (A 1 ' y �`�` • r . rn fir' � ' '••- i E = j9l —it iT 47 � � it 47 1 t I al i� II Mill tL it 7. = J _ i—.� �a ,�� i l � y °� :• �^ r N U Efl- _ ADMIRALTY - PHASE It .1;� .... PAD.[ OCACH CAROCHS. 17LORIOA - �j TOwHS1,P 42 SOUni SCCnO" 12 RAHGC {2 CASs ... ---.. ........_..- - ....` — — <.tic«< t� 3, ,I�11' 11.• 14 1 \ t `_. N IZ=V. . 61 2 ' �• � � ` =`�� rl ;�c �' '' �, Zl 111 1 - � fTl tl� 1 7 � is '_ - 1' �� •��/ E` �` it <� �_.., cQ ate•, ° � Q is —¢ ca *oom4e%o . _ . o a jo , a Oa •O o l f 76 Admiralty _ w =� / Palm Poach Gacdc7— t } ^ J♦ \ t 2 ' �• � � ` =`�� rl ;�c �' '' �, Zl 111 1 - � fTl tl� 1 7 � is '_ - 1' �� •��/ E` �` it <� �_.., cQ ate•, ° � Q is —¢ ca *oom4e%o . _ . o a jo , a Oa •O o l f 76 Admiralty _ w =� / Palm Poach Gacdc7— t ROOF 5TH FLOO 4TH FLOO 3RD FLOO 2ND FLOG IST FL(" 1319 s f 91 5f =1% _ 25% 1 SIGNAGE ELEVATION SGALE/ l' -20' -0' project no_ l 97127 date: r, ADMIRALTY - PHASE 11 03/14/00 0UVER • GUDDEN & PARTNER.S PALL( BEACH GARDENS. FLORDA drawn by ARCN1 TEC PURE - I HTERIOR OESIGN TOWSW42SOUTU SECTION 12 RANG£ 42 EAST 1(H ■ checked by ultaasul - rnx: x�6sa� � Gftnn�p^cr�'I�^~^mltwi j� • OLIVER • GLIDDEN & PARTNERS ARCHITECTURE • INTERIOR DESIGN April 7, 2000 Jim Norquest, Principal Planner City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 -4698 RE: Admiralty Phase II Project No. 97147 VIA: Facsimile, 799 -4281 Dear Mr. Norquest: Ed Oliver �j John Glidden Daniel Brown City Of P.B. Gardens Keith Spina 12 - GRUWIH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT We understand that the City is in the process of amending the parking section of the land development regulations and that our project is subject to the prospective requirements. At the request of Barbar Springthorpe we are providing this additional justification language for your use: Waiver No, 11 Parking As shown on the submitted site plan, we are requesting approval of a three story garage on the south eastern end of the property. This will result in an increase in the number of provided parking spaces greater than ten percent of the required parking for this phase of the PUD. The required number of parking spaces is 275 and with a two -level garage, we will provide 297 parking spaces. With the optional 3rd level at the garage, we could provide 433 parking spaces. Construction of the third level would only take place when and if there is a prime corporate tenant that has a real and actual demand for the additional parking. Additionally, the originally approved project required and provided 299 spaces in the Phase II. Therefore our total additional parking request is for only 134 additional cars which would give us a total ratio of 5.2 per 1,000 SF - a requirement that is _very common among corporate users. Also, the previously approved garage was a 3 '/2 story garage of 255 feet in length. Our optional 3rd level would make us only a 3 level garage of 265 feet in length. (Same width). The property Owners are actively involved in marketing the property at this time and are attempting to make the property as attractive as possible to prospective tenants for use as corporate headquarters. Based on the owners' experience, adequate parking is an important component of a thriving commercial project and, therefore, a three -level gara e 1401 FORUM WAY, SUITE 100 • WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 • 561- 684 -6841 • FAX: 561- 684 -6890 • E -MAIL: ogp68410ao1.Com Lic. No. AA C000669 • IB 0000977 • • Page 2 for Phase Il is requested. We believe that the garage may enhance the opportunities to attract high -end national corporations to the City of Palm Beach Gardens. Please contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information. Thank you. Ve t yours, JO 14 GLIDDEN enior Partner cc: Sam Kleiner, Esq. Al Malefatto Barbara Springthorpe Joseph Pollock Frank Meroney Timothy Messier Gary Gottlieb David Layman Keith Spina JG:Ijm\ project\ active \97\adm- 7127\supportl n-0407.Itr City of P.B. Gardens i:i'r 12 2000 GRUWIH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT } Q n L.� li LL 11 �- � o0 o0 o0 Ln N Q Q V) Cn CD z z 0 W Q 0 Q Q O U J O 00 J N 1-_ Q d- Q N .- ' C� Q Of U F— z Q O Q 0 ~ X- U) c� O ^ to > \ z Q LJ O Um Li u < Q o ct)w O of 0 of 0 z U 0 0 W o cn Q° O O O O O N J J J J J J D' L, LL- Ll-- L- LL Z af C) O = _ ° ° F- (If J F- F- Of Z (n 0 LL- tf) d N) N CD V) Cn CD z z 0 Of Q 0 Q Q O U J O 00 J N 1-_ N Li w Gn co co O NO V) Cn (n 0 Of Q Q Q Q U U U U 00 00 N 1-_ d- Q N .- Li w Gn co co O NO O M 0 ^ W (14 O CD 00 Q (n J LLJ Q Of U F— Q O Q 0 ~ X- U) c� O ^ to > \ z Q LJ O Um Li u < Q o ct)w O Z Q C) C) w z U 0 w W W o m Q° O (n O J � 0 N J ° ::D CD U = D =O (n =U Z Y Z af C) W 0:� I ° -0c) w (n N w z z z U J J Y Q J Y Y 0_ Y >> W Of ° i M O O d _J o Q Q Q Q J J z z_ 0- Q 0- 0- Y O U Z 0 Q O J N Q U N Li (n N w ° O Of 0- J Q F- O E-- City of P Ir. r.. B_ Carde»S . ; -12 GRuVy! <<'tlU a1gNAGEMH �IPA RTIHENTT C� z 0 Q O J N U� U� Q Q U U M J Q Li_ Z � O_ t- O Q J Q z O w o Q 0 .J ~ w LLJ w J z .2 3 t I w 0 O Of (n J LLJ Q U F— Q O w 0 ~ X- U) O ^ to > \ z Q LJ O Um u < Q o ct)w o Z Q (7 of (n U 0 w Y z U LU Q 0- 1 m Q° (n O J 0- W cn N J ° ::D CD U = O � =O (n =U Z Y Z af I ° -0c) w j X O_ Of (3) 0_ W W N z ° i M O O d _J w Of af a_ LL- O O O Q �- z_ z wm Y Y Q o% Q 0' Q co w Q LL. O Q Q U ° ° ° ((n Z W Q C lag Q X _ _ * W WIMH � IIIfl��IG AlfirA J. Mik(AR0 561650 -7908 MACLMOA@g(lIW.Cotu February 29, 2000 VIA HAND DELIVERY Mr. James Norquest, AICP Principal Planner City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 North Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Re: Petition PUD- 99 -02, Admiralty II, Phase II Dear Mr. Norquest: As a follow -up to the February 22' workshop before the Planning & Zoning Board ( "P &Z), and as preparation for our public hearing before P &Z on March 14, we hereby request the following additional waivers. Waiver No. 9 - Signage There is an existing wall sign on the ten -story office building. The signage program approved for the property was adopted via Resolution 61, 1988. According to the staff report prepared for the February P&Z workshop, the sign `vas supposed to be no higher than the second floor, but today it is above the tenth floor. Unless the applicant can establish that the City approved this change, this sign would be considered illegal, and would have to be removed. Another option would be for the applicant to request a waiver as part of this application." A waiver is hereby requested for the following reasons: (1) the approval for the sign height above the tenth floor has not been found primarily due to the status of the city files and the on -going relocation to the new city hall. (2) there was code enforcement action in 1995/96 by the city against the property owner related to unauthorized changes in some on -site signs (changes were made by a tenant without the express permission of the property owner or city). Additionally, .a request to amend the hotel signage and a PUD amendment to repaint the buildings was prod around the same time. A thorough staff review of the approved signage for Ahe egtir ✓a �OfjOB��C11 GREENBERC TRAURIC, CA_ P.O. Box 20629 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 334t6-(Q24__ S61 -650 -7900 FAX 561 -6SS -6222 www.6tlaw.Com 1 v 777 SOUT(( FLACLER DRIVE Su(TE 300 EAST WEST PALM BEACH, FLOR(OA 33 01\ / M(AM[ NEW YORK WASH(NCTON, D.C_ ATLANTA PHILAOELCH[A TYSONS CORNER �CfJA�O�' - - -- - SAO PAULO FORT LAUOERO ALE WEST PALM BEACI( ORLANDO TALLAIIASSEE BOCA RATOON - • LJ • Mr. James Norquest, AICP February 29, 2000 Page 2 project took place during this period. No mention of any violation for the existing sign above the tenth floor was made at that time. The applicant believes that if a violation existed for the signage, it would have been brought to the attention of the property owner during the PUD amendment process. Resolution 85, 1995 (attached) addresses only the hotel sign changes, and the required sign changes for Admiralty Bank. Because it is difficult to establish at this time when the City allowed the sign at the existing height, a waiver is hereby requested. Waiver Flo. 1Q - Signage The applicant requests a waiver for the wall sign on the south facade of the proposed five - story building. It is requested that a building identification or tenant sign be allowed at the fifth floor level. Due to the elevation of the building and its close proximity to Interstate I -95, a sign at the second floor level, currently allowed by code, would not be clearly visible and would defeat the purpose of the sign. Please incorporate these waivers into our current application. Please contact me if you have any questions or need any additional information. Thank you. Enclosure cc: Sam Kleiner, Esq. Mr. John Glidden, AIA Mr. Joseph Pollock, P.E. Mr. Frank Meroney, ASLA Mr. Timothy Messler, P.E. Mr. Gary Gottlieb David M. Layman, Esq. Barbara Springthorpe, AICP G 1(cEN61aic T [(AUKIc Q 0.82 • • is Wlfiffl A T T O R N E Y S A T L A W Alfred J. Malefatto 561 -650 -7908 MalefattoA@gdaw.cofn February 8, 2000 VIA HAND DELIVERY Mr. James Norquest, AICP Principal Planner City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 North Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Re: Petition PUD- 99 -02, Admiralty II, Phase II Dear Mr. Norquest: Attached please find eight (8) copies of our response to the staff comments discussed during the January 27, 2000, DRC meeting. The site, landscape and civil engineering plans have been revised and will be forwarded to you under separate cover by the end of the day. It is our understanding that this proposed development will be placed on the February 22 Planning & Zoning Board workshop agenda. Please contact me if you need any additional information or copies in order to process this request. Thank you. Enclosure cc: Sam Kleiner, Esq. Mr. John Glidden, AIA Mr. Joseph Pollock, P.E. Mr. Frank Meroney, ASLA Mr. Timothy Messler, P.E. Mr. Gary Gottlieb David M. Layman, Esq. Barbara Springthorpe, AICP W P B/S P RINGTI t0 RP EB25532G5hOc011. DOCr2tO8/00/ 1 8910.020000 GREEN13ERG TRAURIG, P.A. P.O. Box 20629 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33416 -0629 561- 650 -7900 FAX 561 -655 -6222 www.gtlaw.com ( \n^ r 777 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE SUITE 300 EAST WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 330-1 MIAMI NEW YORK WASHINGTON, D.C. ATLANTA PHILADELPHIA TYSONS CORNER CHICAGO SAO PAULO FORT LAUDERDALE WEST PALM BEACH ORLANDO TALLAHASSEE BoCA RATON Y J�. So . Sean D. Donahue, P.E. comments • We have reviewed the applicant's responses to our previous comments: the applicant's responses to the City's memorandum: and the revised Site Plan and Landscape Plans received on January 20. 2000. We have the following comments that are based on — our December 171 1999 memorandum; 1. Previouslv Satisfied. No response necessary. 2. Previously Satisfied, No response necessary. 3. Previously Satisfied. No response necessary. 4. Previously Satisfied. No response necessary. 5. Not Satisfied. The applicant is proposing 9 -feet wide parking spaces. The Citv's (_DRs require the standard Darkina space to be a minimum of 10 -feet wide by 18.5 -feet deep. We continue to support the City's LDR requirements. If 9 -feet wide spaces are accepted by the Citv Council. then the spaces will be need to be double striped, A waiver for this requirement has been requested. The applicant proposes to double - stripe the parking spaces. 6. Previously Satisfied. No response necessary. 7. Conditionaliv Satisfied. The applicant lists 3 loading spaces in the Droiect data table of the Site Plan. which meets the minimum number of loading spaces. per LDR Section 118 -569: however there are only 2 loading spaces shown on the site plan. The applicant has requested a waiver for the number of loading spaces, 1<1 g , A waiver for this requirement has been requested. The project data table h n reviFed to" reflect 2 loading spaces. V cp CO $, The applicant will need to revise the loadina spaces to include maneuvering aprons with the dimensions of 12 -feet wide by 35 -feet Iona behind the loading spaces. We recommend moving the spaces to the north to make up the distance needed for the apron. The apron should be shown on the site Plan. The site plan has been amended to include maneuvering aprons. 9. Previously Satisfied. No response necessary. 1p, Previouslv Satisfied. No response necessary. 11. Previously Satisfied. No response necessary. 12. Previously Satisfied. No response necessary. 13. Previously Satisfied. • No response necessary. 14, Not Satisfied. Curbina has been added to all but one of the landscaping islands. The landscap_ ina island near the north dumpster located to the east of the existina_ hotel is missing a curb on the Site Plan and Landscape Plans. The site plan, landscape plan and engineering plans (sheet C -1) have been revised to reflect the required curb. 15. Conditionally Satisfied. The applicant will need to add a note to the Site Plan to describina the directional sians near the circular drive. This note is included on the building plan, but is not on the site plan due to the scale of the site plan. 16. The Site Plan shows a hatched laver alona the entrance drive to the Phase II- Office Building. The applicant needs to identifv the entrance drive if it is to be paver bricks with . flush header curbs or remove the hatchina. This should also be reflected in the Legend and be included on the Landscape Plans. K The site plan legend has been amended to identify the entrance drive with paver bricks and flush header curbs. The landscape and engineering plans have also been amended. A waiver for the paver bricks is included below. 17. If the applicant decides to use paver bricks in the entrance drive. the stop bars must be revised to use white Daver bricks or another alternative other than thermoplastic. If the applicant decides not to use Daver bricks. the Legend should indicate that the stop bars are thermoplastic and not painted. The site plan has been amended to show that the applicant will incorporate DOT pavers for the stop bars. No thermoplastic paints will be used in paver areas. 18, The applicant will need to add notes to explain the proposed changes to the entrance drive off of PGA Boulevard. See Page SP - 1 of the site plan for notes of explanation on the entrance drive changes. 19. The catch basins that are shown on the Landscape Plans are in the wrong_ locations and Some have been omitted. 0 The landscape plan has been amended to reflect the civil engineer's drawings. 20, The Landscape Plans show a Washinaton Palm that appears to be located directly on top of a catch basina that is connected to the roof drain of the building. More sDecifically. the fourth Dalm to the north of the building appears to be located on the catch basin. The landscape plan has been amended to reflect the proper proposed location of the Washingtonian Palm. 21. The Pavina. Gradina and Drainage Plan received on January 20. 2000 shows two catch basins located under the ramp to the parkina garage. Messier and Associates. Inc. .5ubmitted a revised Pavina. Gradina and Drainaae Plan on January 24. 2000 that notes that the catch basins will be removed. The removal of the catch basins will cut off the connection of the southern exfiltration trenches to the retention area. The plan should be revised to show the connection in a different location. We have revised the plans to remove the catch basins under the ramp to the garage and have added two new catch basins west of the ramp. These new catch basins tie into the exfiltration system and will be used as the outfall for this system. 0 3 22. The revised Paving. Gradina and Drainaae Plan received on January 24. 2000 shows i that an inlet will be converted to a manhole at the northwest comer of the reconstructed panting lot. The runoff direction arrows show proposed grading_ towards the Droposed manhole. We have revised the plans to show the flow arrows pointing in the correct direction, which is towards the inlet and not the converted inlet. 23. The T000arao_ hic Map and the Boundary survey are in conflict with respect to the swale, that borders the south side of PGA Boulevard. One map shows two swales and a Separation with a culvert and the other map shows one swale. Based on field observations. the Topoaraphic Map appears to be correct. The applicant needs to revise the plans to show the correct confia_uration. We note that the Paving. Grading_ and Drainaae Plans are also in error. The site plan and drainage plans have been amended to reflect the existing situation. 24. In order to clarify_ the issue of the turning lane off of PGA Boulevard and traffic concurrence. the Palm Beach Countv Traffic Engineering Department and the City's traffic consultant. MTP Group. determined that this conditions is required to achieve 40 traffic concurrence. We will support the Countv's condition for the turning lane. • Attached is a copy of the letter from Daniel Weisberg, Palm Beach County Engineering Department, confirming the turning lane is not a concurrency issue. As discussed at the DRC meeting, the applicant may need to obtain a waiver from FDOT on the length of the turning /deceleration lane. 25. The applicant's response to the Citv's memorandum dated January 5. 2000 states that the applicant wishes to withdraw the proposed bridge in the parking_ garage. The applicant will need to remove the bridae from the Site Plan and Landscape Plan. The site plan and landscape plan have been revised to reflect the deletion of the bridge. 4 C r -( 0 Mark Hendrickson comments: I have reviewed the above - referenced petition submitted January 19. 2000. The following are. my comments and recommendations for the January 27. 2000 DRC meetina: As a condition of the approval for the time extension. I recommend that all exotic vegetation be removed from the phase two area within three (3) months. The area shall be araded and araas seeded within four (4) months of the time extension approval. The petitioner continues to agree, to this condition. As noted above, the applicant agrees to this condition. The petitioner has requested waivers from Sect. 118 -213. entitled PUD Planned Unit Development Districts. which requires a 20 feet setback is required between commercial and residential land uses to buffer the uses. and Sect. 118 -279. entitled Yards. which requires a six- foot tall wall is required between commercial and residential uses. $tall is recommending. in addition to the proposed landscaping. a chain -link fence in -lieu of a -wall (aates as needed) between the parking_ a_araaes and from the eastern garaae to the 1 -95 fence. The applicant has no objection to providing a chain -link fence with gates as needed in these two areas of the site. There are three parcels (A. B & C) that provide for connections from the Admiralty II project to Tanalewood PUD. Parcels A and B have Davement connections to the Tanalewood PUD road system. Ordinance 15. 1987. section 6(a) requires the parkina aaraaes to be connected to the Tanalewood PUD. It also states "The said aaraae openings shall be chained off from use and remain in Such status until the Citv Council shall by R8s01ution direct otherwise." Preliminarily. staff is in suDDort of the elimination of the connection between the new aaraae and the Tanalewood Apartments site. and the removal of the existina connection between the old garage and Tanalewood. The one -wav road connection needs to have a leaal cross access agreement between property owners for no less than pedestrians traffic. The owners of both the Admiralty and Tanglewood properties believe the existing surface connection should be completely terminated, particularly since Tanglewood intends to limit access as part of its redevelopment plans. The proposed entrance reconfiguration has too much asphalt and would eliminate some native existina veaetation. Please consider modifvina_ the proposal to keep the native plants and lessen the asphalt area. �jlct 5 The site plan has been amended to reflect this comment. 0 • The number of existing flaa poles would need a waiver. Please see waiver request below. Please provide an alternate location for art closer to a public right -of -way, The applicant will defer to the Art in Public Places Commission regarding placement and will continue to maintain the option to relocate or to make a financial contribution as the situation develops. The reauired /or000sed riaht turn lane off of PGA Boulevard mav_ involve relocatina auide wires or utilities, which in turn mav affect some existina streetscape trees. Please locate on a plan these items and double check any potential conflicts. Please see revised site plan. Please be aware that staff will be generating a condition of approval that will involve the maintenance of off -site landscaoina along PGA Boulevard and 1 -95. The applicant has no objection to this. II • James Norquest comments (verbal during DRC meeting) Applicant shall review all previous conditions of approval and submit the conditions to staff, Applicant has reviewed previous conditions of approval and met with staff. We will provide the conditions to staff on disk once the conditions have been finalized. Is there bike Darkina on -site? Bike parking has been added. See revised site plan. Color consistency of proposed sianaae with existina sianaae will be required. Applicant agrees to change the building sign to match either the hotel sign color or the Phase I office sign color. if there will be two around signs. we may be limited to the same 3 tenant names on each sign. . It is the applicant's understanding that three additional tenant names may be placed on the proposed Phase II sign. • 7 • • Police Department representative comments (verbal during DRC meeting) For security ourrooses . fencing (wit h gates ?) s ho uld be provided on east _ side of property alpng 1 -95 and between the aaraaes. As stated above, the applicant has no objection to providing a chain -link fence with gates as needed in these two areas of the site. Liahtina should be provided around retention area. The applicant will provide lighting around retention area. The lighting fixtures will be approximately two to three feet high. Will buildina have alarm? The building will be equipped with an alarm system. Convex mirrors must be Dlaced in garage stairwells. Applicant will provide convex mirrors in garage stairwells. 0 C I :_ 3 • • Fire Marshal comments (verbal during DRC meeting) New fire Dumps will be required for this phase of the project. New fire pumps will be provided for this Phase II project. 9 CI: 0 WAIVERS The following waivers have already been submitted for staff review. • Waiver No. 1 - parking space size. Waiver No. 2 - loading spaces. Waiver No. 3 - 6' high wall. Waiver No. 4 - rear setback. Waiver No. 5 - signage on building. REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL WAIVERS Based on the applicant's recent discussions with staff, and the comments received at DRC meetings, the following additional waivers are requested. Waiver No. 6 - Plat As discussed during the DRC meetings, it is likely that a boundary plat with easements will be required as a condition of approval. It is the applicant's understanding from the last DRC meeting that Section 114- 36.(c)of the existing subdivision code is undergoing review at this time for possible amendments. This section of the code currently requires that boundary plats be recorded prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy ( "CO "). It is possible that this section will be amended in the near future to require that boundary plats be recorded prior to building permit issuance. The applicant, therefore, requests a waiver to record the boundary plat prior to the issuance of the CO, in the event that the code is changed during the approval process for this PUD. It is the applicant's intent to commence the platting process shortly, but as a precaution, we would like to have the assurance that the boundary plat may be recorded prior to CO issuance. Waiver No. 7 - Pavers The code does not allow for unit pavers. The applicant would like to have colored concrete pavers in the driveways, as shown on the proposed site plan. These pavers will be similar to the existing pavers in Phase 1. Waiver No. 8 - Number of Flao Poles Currently there exists four (4) flagpoles on the property. A maximum of three (3) poles are allowed (Section 110 -2.b). The applicant requests that it be allowed to continue to have the four flagpoles. WPB /SPPoNGDK">EW53632I`Ax Ot1.00C/2N8r00 ie970.020000 10 City Council Meeting aQ'p sc"S May 18, 2000 Petition MISC -99 -18 1 1.11, .__ • CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum • Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: May 12, 2000 SUBJECT /AGENDA ITEM: Petition MISC -99 -18 Resolution 33, 2000 (Golf Digest Entries), a request for site plan approval of the entry features and landscape for the Golf Digest PCD. The request is submitted by Urban Design Studio, agent, on behalf of Taylor Woodrow Communities /Golf Digest, Ltd., owner /developer. Recommendation/Motion: Staff recommends annmval of Resolution 33. 2000_ with nnnditinnc Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ 0 Council Action: Total City Attorney Growth Management [ ] Approved_ Department Finance N/A $ 0 [ ] Approved w/ ACM Current FY conditions Human Res. N/A [ ] Denied Other N/A Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Advertised: Date: N/A [ ] Operating Attachments: Paper: N/A [ ] Other N/A • Resolution 33, 2000 • Site Plan • Elevations • County Letter • City Engineer comments • City Forester - [ X ] Not Required comments SFu4;9e4n-- Gh Affected parties Budget Acct. #:: Department [ ] Notified Approved by: City Manager [ X ] Not required BACKGROUND: The Golf Digest PCD is located along the north side of PGA Blvd., west of the Florida Turnpike, east of the Loxahatchee Slough, and south of Hood Road. (3, 4 &5- 42S -42E and 32, 33&34-41S-42E). The Golf Digest entries, east and west, are located along PGA Blvd. The east entry is approximately 1000 feet west of the Florida Turnpike, while the west entry is approximately at the . center of the PCD along PGA Blvd. By condition of the PCD, the entry features associated with these two entries are to be approved by the City Council. Ci..v 1 City Council Meeting May 18, 2000 Petition MISC -99 -18 LAND USE AND ZONING: The following table contains the land use designations and zoning classifications of the subject property and surrounding land within the immediate vicinity of the Golf Digest PCD: ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS & LAND USE DESIGNATIONS EXISTING USE ZONING LAND USE Subject Property Planned Community District PCD CD North Palm Beach County Single County Single Family Family Residential Residential and Residential Transitional South PCD (PGA National) PCD West Conservation Conservation East Planned Development Area Residential Medium PDA) PROPOSED REQUEST: The request for the site plan approval consists of landscape as well as hardscape. The hardscape includes one rotary and two lake fountains at each entrance. The rotary fountains are proposed to be located within the County's right -of -way. Palm Beach County has not objected to the placement of the proposed landscape and hardscape within its right -of -way, but has attached conditions to its approval. The conditions call for sight distance analysis, pedestrian facilities, and street lighting. Please see attachment for specific language and details per each condition. PROCEDURE: Condition # 4 of the Development Order of the Golf Digest PCD specifies that the entrance features shall undergo site plan review and consideration by the City Council, without review of the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee. STAFF COMMENTS: The proposed entry features have been reviewed by the City Forester, the City Engineer, the Planning Department, the Building Department, the Police Department, and Palm Beach County. The only substantive comments came from the City Engineer and from Palm Beach County Engineering and Public Works. The City Engineer has concerns about some of the details of the plans such as curbing, signage, cross walks, and the lake maintenance easements. Palm Beach County will permit the features subject to several conditions of approval, as detailed in their letter to Mock, Roos & Associates dated February 22, 1999 (attached). Staff recommends that the above concerns and conditions be addressed by the City with conditions as part of this approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Golf Digest Entries petition, subject to the following conditions: 2 City Council Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Petition: MISC -99 -18 ............. ............................... 1. The petitioner must satisfy all conditions of approval referenced in Palm Beach County's letter to Mock, Roos & Associates, Inc. dated February 22, 1999. 2. Prior to construction plan approval, the petitioner must address all comments and concerns raised by the City Engineer in his memo dated May 11, 2000. G:Talal/MISC- 99 -18 -st 1 • � All� RESOLUTION 33, 2000 April 20, 2000 May 12, 2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT FOR ENTRY FEATURES WITHIN THE GOLF DIGEST PCD ALONG PGA BLVD. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF PGA BLVD., WEST OF THE FLORIDA TURNPIKE, EAST OF THE LOXAHATCHEE SLOUGH, AND SOUTH OF HOOD ROAD; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received an application from the TAYLOR WOODROW COMM UNITIES /FOLF DIGEST, LTD., to approve a site plan for the construction of entry features along PGA Blvd. for property located along the north side of PGA Blvd., west of the Florida Turnpike, east of the Loxahatchee Slough, and south of Hood Road; and WHEREAS, the City's Growth Management Department has determined that approval of said application is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida hereby approves a site plan for the development of entry features for the Golf Digest PCD along PGA Blvd. The subject property is located along the north side of PGA Blvd., west of the Florida Turnpike, east of the Loxahatchee Slough, and south of Hood Road. Section 2. Said site plan approval shall comply with the following conditions which shall be applicable to the applicant, its successors, assigns, and /or grantees: 1. The petitioner must satisfy all conditions of approval referenced in Palm Beach County's letter to Mock, Roos & Associates, Inc. dated February 22, 1999. 2. Prior to construction plan approval, the petitioner must address all comments and concerns raised by the City Engineer in his memo dated May 11, 2000. • Section 3. Said approval shall be consistent with plans filed with the City's Growth Management Department as follows: 1. Entry Feature Hardscape/ Entry Features by Krent Wieland Design, Inc:, Sheets 1 through 6, April 25, 2000. Section 4. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS ATTESTED BY: • CAROL GOLD VOTE: MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR JABLIN COUNCILWOMEN FURTADO COUNCILMAN CLARK COUNCILMAN SABATELLO G:Talal /M ISC- 99- 18- re.doc • DAY OF 2000. JOSEPH RUSSO, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY: CITY ATTORNEY AYE NAY ABSENT 4 iL CO 0 ONSUI1IN J CIVIL ENGINEERS. SUR\ INORS K MAPPERS CIVI AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES WATER & WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING & MAPPING GIS • "Partners For Results Value by Design" 10-1 50 S.W. Corporate Pkwy. Palm City, FL 34990 (561) 286 -3883 Fax: (561) 286 -3925 www.Ib(h.Coll MEMORANDUM TO: Ed Tombari FROM: Sean C. Donahue, P.E. C-:;;LO DATE: May 11, 2000 FILE NO. 00 -4119 (Petition No. MISC- 99 -18) SUBJECT: Golf Digest- PGA Boulevard Entries We have reviewed the East Entry Site Plan, West Entry Site Plan, Detail Elevations, landscape cross - sections, and the Entry Feature Details and Notes plans received on March 31 and April 27, 2000. We have the following comments, which are based on our March 6, 2000 memorandum: 1. Comment Withdrawn. 2. Comment Withdrawn. 3. Not Satisfied. The applicant will need to submit a.-preliminary drainage plan. 4. Not Satisfied. The applicant needs to include stop signs and stop bars at the appropriate locations on the site plans. 5. Not Satisfied. The applicant needs to show handicapped ramps and cross walk locations on the site plans. The applicant will also need to show a handicapped ramp detail on the site plans. 6. Not Satisfied. The applicant will need to show the existing curbing, if any in the public right -of -way of PGA Boulevard, and how the applicant will transition the entry curbing into the existing curbing. 7. Not Satisfied. The applicant will need to indicate the type of curbing that is proposed and include the appropriate curb details on the site plans. 8. Not Satisfied. The applicant will need to include the appropriate street signage on the site plans. �. 1 Golf Digest -PGA Boulevard Entries Page 2 of 2 LBFH File No. 00 -4119 9. Not Satisfied. The applicant will need to include roadway and roundabout cross - sections on the site plans. 10. The applicant needs to provide an accessible 20 -feet wide lake maintenance tract completely around each of the lakes, including the sections with retaining walls. The lake maintenance tract needs to be show with a slope no steeper than 8:1. No large trees or permanent structures will be permitted in the lake maintenance tract. 11. The applicant needs to remove the 90° bends in the existing lake maintenance tracts. Further, the applicant needs to provide access to each of the lake maintenance tracts. 12. The applicant needs to label all sidewalk widths, including the sidewalks that branch off of the 12 -feet wide parkway bike path. The applicant is requested to return a copy of our comments with the applicant's acknowledgement of each comment and the response. Compliance will expedite the subsequent review. SCD/ cc: Roxanne Manning Jim Norquest PAPROJECTS\PBGMEMOW 119\4119b • C ? 2 � � Department of Engineering and Public Works P.O. Box 21229 Vest Palm Beach. FL 33416 -1229 (561) 684 -4000 www.co.paim- beach. fl.us E Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Maude Ford Lee. Chair % ren H. Newell, Vice Chairman . Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Roberts Mary McCarty Burt Aaronson Tony Masilord County Administrator Robert Weisman • An Equal Oppmrruracy if nKrrr Action Empi 3.y&' - -Oct. .'CK - ROOS FIEB 2 6 1999 �; A. 01a February 22, 1999 Route to: Robert Cain Seen by. (�►-- /1 rp Mock, Roos & Associates, Inc. Retum to: 5720 Corporate Way West Palm Beach, FL 33407 RE: GOLF DIGEST - PROPOSED JOG ROAD ROUNDABOUTS Dear Mr. Cain: I am writing to follow up on your recent conversation with Charlie Walker concerning the beautification of the above - referenced Jog Road roundabouts. While the County would not ordinarily approve the installation of features such as fountains within the medians of roundabouts on County roadways, the roundabouts planned to be constructed within the Golf Digest project are sufficiently large to safely accommodate such features. Palm Beach County would permit such fountains and landscaping within the medians of these roundabouts subject to the following conditions: • Pedestrian facilities are to be provided within the right -of- way for Jog Road around the roundabouts. • Acceptable street lighting is to be provided at each roundabout. • The minimum setback from the face of "F" curb to the proposed fountain structure is to be 20'. c, y ,611 I� ors 9�r Fryy y �� The proposed underground utilities are to be located at a point that is to be 10' (minimum) from the gutter line, as had been previously shown on the typical section. No paved walking areas that will encourage pedestrian activity in the central island of the roundabouts are to be provided. A sight distance analysis will be required to demonstrate that the proposed median features will not interfere with required stopping sight distance. C1:3 i ��ACi•� C �OR1�� February 22, 1999 page 2 • An agreement covering maintenance, indemnification of the County, removal of the features, etc., will be required. All of the proposed landscaping and water feature improvements to be contained within the central island of the roundabout are to be reviewed and permitted by the Palm Beach County Engineering Department. If you have any questions concerning this matter please contact me. Sincerely, OFF1C F H O N ENGINEER i� Andrew S. Hertel, AICP Traffic Division ASH:meo PC: George T. Webb, P.E., County Engineer Edwin A. Jack, P.E., Deputy County Engineer G. Haney Frakes, Jr., P.E., Assistant County Engineer Omelio Fernandez, P.E., Director, Roadway Production Division Charles R. Walker, Jr., P.E., Director, Traffic Division Marlene Everitt, Assistant County Attorney Jim Peters, Land Development Division File: Roads - Jog Road S/D - Golf Digest ash\cain.mr n. 3 C l 4 E 0 III 4% ca 'ell 0 01 r , Ail a 12r 0 p 'P 0 'P o ...'A 0 0 �-, \-AJ lilt lilt lilt H11 1* o f] till, I M lilt]; .1, 3.w till[ ENTRY FEATURES - ALTERNATE LANDSCAPE LqTK)VEWw PLAN • m (nm RAN A TAYLOR W(X-)DROW COMMUNITIES m LF DKSEST ri-)CD Q � C PALM i GARDENS, FI-01i J1 a SS 431 44 i io P cn a P 4% ca 'ell 0 01 r , Ail a 12r 0 p 'P 0 'P o ...'A 0 0 �-, \-AJ lilt lilt lilt H11 1* o f] till, I M lilt]; .1, 3.w till[ ENTRY FEATURES - ALTERNATE LANDSCAPE LqTK)VEWw PLAN • m (nm RAN A TAYLOR W(X-)DROW COMMUNITIES m LF DKSEST ri-)CD Q � C PALM i GARDENS, FI-01i J1 a SS 431 io P cn a P o 4% ca 'ell 0 01 r , Ail a 12r 0 p 'P 0 'P o ...'A 0 0 �-, \-AJ lilt lilt lilt H11 1* o f] till, I M lilt]; .1, 3.w till[ ENTRY FEATURES - ALTERNATE LANDSCAPE LqTK)VEWw PLAN • m (nm RAN A TAYLOR W(X-)DROW COMMUNITIES m LF DKSEST ri-)CD Q � C PALM i GARDENS, FI-01i 0 r t • • 0 0 o 0 tn R m rn a 'P "T V z; 4-4 1 g;' quo cu m 1,0 CF) Qq 7 0 0� 2N. ENTRY FEATURES ALTERNATE LANDSCAPE RN)ROVEMENT PLAN E m TAYLOR WOODROW COMMUNRIES m GOLF DGEST P(CD PALM BEACAI GARDENS, FLORIDA • • cl 0 < �I Aill fill 0 > II �) ; Z m t==El r- m > ii -01 0 7, ma , ENTRY FEATURES TAYLOR WOODROW COMMUNITIES C ! I M zz GOLF U0, EST PCD C) PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA m m -u m X 8 1 �F cf) > cz) m Aill fill 0 > II �) ; Z m t==El r- m > ii -01 0 7, ma , ENTRY FEATURES TAYLOR WOODROW COMMUNITIES C ! I M zz GOLF U0, EST PCD C) PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA • • I� s' 4' D nQQ ®o zmo cn. , �o go go t I 1 � M • • .7r L 4r% 0 11 il ENIRY FEATURES — ALTERNATE LANDSCAPE WROVEWNT PLAN TAYLOR WOOMOW COMMUNITIES T CD GOLIF DGES P PALM BEACH GARDENS. FLORIDA IF t IT Is 0 C. A A TW M,- r I V. 0),2 11 il ENIRY FEATURES — ALTERNATE LANDSCAPE WROVEWNT PLAN TAYLOR WOOMOW COMMUNITIES T CD GOLIF DGES P PALM BEACH GARDENS. FLORIDA IF t IT Is 0 C. • A TW M,- r I V. 0),2 C) is f7 n • 0 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 27, 2000 SUBJECT /AGENDA ITEM Consideration of Approval: Resolution 38, 2000, a request for approval of a wall sign on the BellSouth Switching Station. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Resolution 38, 2000. Reviewed by: City Attorney (� Finance NA ACM Human Res. NA Other NA >� O - - O 0 Submitted by: Growth Management Director Approved by: City Manager fl REQUEST Originating Dept.: Costs: $ Council Action: Total Growth Management [ ] Approved $ [ ] Approved w/ JCurrent FY conditions Funding Source: [ ] Denied [ ] Continued to: Advertised: Attachments: Date: [ ] Operating Paper: [ ]Other • Resolution 38, 2000 *Elevation & Sign Detail [X] Not Required Affected parties Budget Acct. #:: [ ] Notified [ ] None [X] Not required Rod A. Feiner, Esquire, agent for BellSouth, is requesting approval for a wall sign on the telephone utility /switching station. The site is located on the south side of RCA Boulevard, approximately 0.2 miles east of the intersection of RCA Boulevard and Alternate Al A. (7- 42S -43E) 0 % '5-,' �J C7 City Council Petition MISC -00 -04 Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 27, 2000 BACKGROUND BellSouth (formerly known as Southern Bell) received site plan approval on August 16, 1969. Building Division plans show that an addition was done in October 1973; this addition approximately doubled the size of the building to its current size (23,094 square feet). The building is a switching station, and provides services for the Palm Beach Gardens area as well as other municipalities and unincorporated areas throughout the entire southeast. Because of the population growth in the southeastern area, including the growing use of home fax machines, cellular phones and digital pagers, an expansion increasing the size of the building from a 23,094 square -foot 1 -story building to a 47,231 square -foot 2 -story building was approved through the adoption of Ordinance 53, 1999 on January 6, 2000. LAND USE AND ZONING The subject site is zoned Residential — Medium Density (RM) with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay, has a future land use designation of Residential — Medium Density (RM), and is listed as Commercial ( C ) on the Vision Plan. For a complete listing of adjacent uses, land use designations and zoning districts, see Table 1 on the following page. Table 2 on page four (4) examines how consistent the proposed project is with the City Code. CONCURRENCY The previously approved building expansion received concurrency certification on September 28, 1999, which included concurrency for traffic, drainage, solid waste, sewer and water. Concurrency review for the proposed wall sign is not required. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SERVICES Because of the nature of this petition, the only members of the City's Development Review Committee (DRC) that were notified regarding this minor petition were the City's Building Division and the City Engineer. Their comments are listed under "Staff Comments." 2 • City Council Petition MISC -00 -04 Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 27, 2000 3 C�:�j East Amara Shrine General Commercial (CG -1) Commercial (C) 3 C�:�j • • Residential - Medium Density (RM) Public Road Right -Of -Way Frontage Needed For A Wall Sign: 100 feet Sign Letter Height: < 36 inches Sign Face Area: 90 square feet Sign Projects From Wall Face: <_ 12 inches Number Of Messages Permitted On Sign: 3 Permitted Type Of Lighting: Backlighting, Internal Lighting, or Permanently Fixed & Encased Face Lighting From Below The Sign Surface Sign Height: < top of building parapet Planned Unit Development (PUD) — telephone utility /switching station 200 feet Sign Letter Height: 16 inches Sign Face Area: 17.3 square feet 2Y2 inches 2 (name and symbol) No Sign Lighting Of Any Type Below Building Parapet 4 City Council Petition MISC -00-04 Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 27, 2000 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes �4 City Council Petition MISC -00 -04 Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 27, 2000 PROCEDURE This is a request for approval of a wall sign. The request is reviewed as a miscellaneous petition by City Staff and the Development Review Committee, who forward comments and recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Acting in an advisory role, the Commission considers the recommendations of the DRC and City Staff and makes a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council reviews the request for a wall sign, and makes a final determination of approval, approval with conditions, or denial. Public hearings are not required. PROJECT DETAILS The proposed wall sign will be made of dark brown, aluminum channel lettering; the color matches the new window materials. The sign will be 1 foot, 4 inches in height, and 13 feet in length. The sign face will be 17.3- square feet in area. The proposed wall sign will not be illuminated. STAFF COMMENTS is Building Official Jack Hanson has stated that the proposed sign meets all code requirements, and City Engineer Sean Donahue voiced no objections regarding this petition. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this petition at their April 11, 2000 meeting. The Commission voiced no major concerns regarding this petition, and unanimously recommended approval. RECOMMENDATION Based on the fact that the proposed sign meets all code requirements, and that the color of the sign material matches the material used with the windows located on the same elevation, Staff recommends approval of Petition MISC -00 -04. g /john: misc0004.cc • G 1 �i 0 April 27, 2000 RESOLUTION 38, 2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION FROM BELLSOUTH FOR A WALL SIGN AT BELLSOUTH SWITCHING STATION, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 0.2 MILES FROM THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ALTERNATE A1A AND RCA BOULEVARD, ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RCA BOULEVARD, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Palm Beach Gardens received an application from BellSouth for approval of a wall sign on the 1.56 -acre BellSouth Switching Station site, approximately 0.2 miles from the southeast corner of Alternate Al and RCA Boulevard, on the south side of RCA Boulevard, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the 1.56 -acre BellSouth Switching Station site is currently zoned Residential — Medium Density (RM) with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay, and a future land use of Residential — Medium Density (RM); and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application and determined that it is sufficient; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application and determined that it is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has recommended approval of the wall sign; and WHEREAS, the City's Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed said application and recommended that it be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida hereby approves the BellSouth wall sign at the BellSouth Switching Station site located at the southeast corner of Alternate A1A and RCA Boulevard, on the south side of RCA Boulevard, as more particularly 6 ��510 • • Resolution 38, 2000 Petition MISC -00 -04 Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 27, 2000 described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. Construction of said wall sign shall be in compliance with the following plans on file with the City's Growth Management Department: 1. January 28, 2000 Site Plan, Roux Architect, Drawing Number A -200 (1 sheet total). 2. January 28, 2000 Exterior Elevations, Roux Architect, Drawing Number A-400 (1 sheet total). 3. January 28, 2000 Signage Legend and Details, Roux Architect, Drawing Number A -503 (1 sheet total). SECTION 3. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 2000. MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO ATTEST BY: CAROL GOLD CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY BY: CITY ATTORNEY VOTE: AYE MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR JABLIN COUNCILWOMAN FURTADO COUNCILMAN CLARK COUNCILMAN SABATELLO g /john: misc0004.res 0 7 NAY ABSENT Resolution 38, 2000 Petition MISC -00 -04 Meeting Date: May 18, 2000 Date Prepared: April 27, 2000 EXHIBIT "A" A PAR:,EL OF LAlV W 5ECTIC11 1, TCI:IZ"IP 41 S XW. RAWF 43 EAST. PALM BEACI4 CO-NTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTKILAR-Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWe, CGt J-tET 1W-x AT UE NORTv -LEST COf; -R OF SECTICN 1, T011, 5 IP 42 60UM, RA4r 43 EAST, T1T-?-L>= 8. 88'10'00' E (FOR TI-E FU:;I BE CF TNI5 DE3CRJf'TIQl TIE Th;E BEART6 CF TIE NOR714 Llt,F- CF SECTICN 1, BMW ON 6a-AR 06URVATICM, 16 S. 88' WOO' E) ALCWj T1E 6AID NORM Ltd CF 5ECTICN 1, A D15TA2,CE OF 1028.44 FEET TO T14E IKTERSECTION OF THE CENTER11W OF T14E R.ORJDA EAST COAST RAILWAY RG14T -OF-WAY IUT14 T14E SAID NORTH LVE CF 6ECTICN 1, DC4CE CCNTNM 8. 88'10'00' E ALCWj TI-E SAID NORTH LINE OF 6ECTICN 1, A DISTANCE OF 46I.M FEET TO TNi= POINT CF BEGIMIM, SAID POINT BEItY 300 FEET EASTERLY (1'1>=A%Fd D ALCW TWE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 1, Ff?Ct1 TWE EASTERLY RSGW -CF -WAY LIt`E CF 106 FOOT ULTf1 LATE RV- 44T -CF -WAY CF STATE ROAD ALTEfJIATE A -I -A SAID POINT Al-50 BEWj TI-E N0RT".LE5T COfZ ER CF TI-E 1-E rN DESCR1BED PARML, TTY 6.01'50'00' W, AT RY14T AWjLE6 TO TFE SAID NORTH LSE CF BECTICN 1, A DISTANCE OF 34020 FEET. T14<NCE S. 88'10'00' E AT RSG141 AW-SLES TO T1E LAST DESCRIBED CGJf25E, A DISTANCE OF 20020 FEET, THENCE K 01' 50'00'E AT Rr3l -lT Af4JLES TO T14E LAST DESCRIBED COIF, A DISTANCE CF 34020 FEET, MOFE OR LESS TO Tl-C SAID NORTH LINE CF SECTION 1, TWI- N- K W'10'00'10. ALGNG TI4E SAID NORTH UZE OF SECTIOR 1, A D15TMCE OF 20020 FEET, f SOFE OR LE39, TO T1$ POINT CF BEGtM W-i CCNTAMMG 681WOD1 6q. Ft OR 156 A.CFE$ MORE OR LE55 LE66 TIE RY30T -CF -WAY OF RGA 1301"ARD. • • • C 1-15 -9 • 0 zI 6O.-)o O IiIiI iNll W . �Qp i�� 0 � > } Il / -- � j. ���i■ - > ` ` ��^ §< : /d a o z.# _ �I %& // oRG / s§ \d ~ ILLJ/ // \ ƒ , «4 e �� a - 0 � > } Il / CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL • Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: 05/08/00 Meeting Date: 05/18/00 0 • Subject/Agenda Item Resolution 41, 2000, Authorizing the Acquisition of Right -of -Way along Burns Road Recommendation /Motion: Consider a motion to approve Resolution 41, 2000. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ 0 Council Action: City Attomey Finance (Total) [ ]Approved $ 0 ( ] Approved w/ Finance Current FY conditions [ j Denied ACM Advertised: Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Other Submitted by: Kent R. Olson K�o Department Director Approved by: I Date: Paper: [ X ] Not Required Affected parties [ ] Notified City Manager VV I [ X ] Not required BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. [ ] Operating ( ] Other Budget Acct. #: Attachments: Memorandum [ ] None 0/6a «i2�Ll. � CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS r MEMORANDUM �� who *-o TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: May 8, 2000 APPROVED: Nabar E. Martinez, City ManagerNA FROM: Kent R. Olson, Finance Director no SUBJECT: Resolution 41, 2000 BACKGROUND The widening of Burns Road will require the acquisition of right -of -way to accommodate the expansion. Resolution 41, 2000 will provide the necessary authority to move forward with this acquisition. DISCUSSION In order to widen Burns Road, the City needs to acquire property along mainly the • south side of Burns Road. Resolution 41, 2000 authorizes the City to acquire the needed property in order that the construction will be completed before the traffic problems begin on PGA Boulevard. The City must adopt this Resolution at the May 18 meeting if we are to meet this timeline. • RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 41, 2000, authorizing the City to acquire the right -of -way necessary for the widening of Burns Road. 0163 RESOLUTION 41, 2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF RIGHT -OF- WAY ALONG BURNS ROAD AND THE FILING OF EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, as authorized by chapters 73 and 74, Florida Statutes, and sections 166.401 and 166.411, Florida Statutes, the City may exercise its right and power of eminent domain to acquire rights -of -way for streets and roadways when the acquisition of such property is in the interests of the public health, safety and welfare of the City and its residents; and WHEREAS, due to rapid development within the City and the anticipated improvements to PGA Boulevard, including, but not limited to, the construction of the PGA Flyover, the City Council has determined that it is a public necessity and in the interests of the public health, safety and welfare to add additional lanes of traffic to Burns Road, thereby effectuating east -west traffic movement throughout the City; and WHEREAS, in order to construct these extra lanes of traffic, the City Council deems it to be a public necessity to acquire absolute possession and unencumbered fee simple title to that real property described in Composite Exhibit "A" attached hereto free and clear of any claims of interest, liens, estates, encumbrances, or occupancies, for the purpose of expanding the existing Burns Road right -of -way, all such property located within the City's corporate limits. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA THAT: Section 1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated as though fully set forth herein. Section 2. The City Council hereby declares it to be a public necessity to acquire absolute possession and unencumbered fee simple title free and clear of any claims of interest to that certain real property more particularly described in Composite Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this references for the purpose of acquiring additional right -of -way for the widening of Burns Road. Section 3. The City Council hereby authorizes the acquisition or discharge of any and all leasehold and other claimed interests in that real property more particularly described in Composite Exhibit "A" by negotiated purchase and /or by exercising its power of eminent domain as granted by sections 166.401 and 166.411, Florida Statutes, and as permitted by chapters 73 and 74, Florida Statutes, as amended, or such other proceedings as may be necessary to clear title to that property described in Composite Exhibit "A" of any and all claims of interest or occupancies. 01 (P y Resolution 41, 2000 Page 2 Section 4. Under the direction and supervision of the City Attorney, the law office of Paul R. Golis, P.A. is hereby authorized and directed to negotiate or alternatively to institute eminent domain proceedings in the Circuit Court in and for the Palm Beach County, Florida, or such other proceedings as may be necessary to acquire absolute possession and unencumbered fee simple title free of all claims of interest. Section 5. Under the direction and supervision of the City Attorney and City staff, the law office of Paul R. Golis, P.A. is authorized to retain the services of appraisers and other experts deemed necessary for the adequate and complete preparation of an action in eminent domain or such other proceeding as may be necessary to acquire absolute possession and unencumbered fee simple title absent negotiated settlement of the acquisition. Section 6. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. RESOLVED AND ADOPTED this day of 2000. 0 MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO ATTESTED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY VOTE: MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR JABLIN COUNCILMAN SABATELLO COUNCILWOMAN FURTADO COUNCILMAN CLARK AYE NAY ABSENT PACPWin \HIST0RY\000417A \43F.1 C\stm(1501.000) U—] 0165- / 65- i P.O.C. WEST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 7/42/43 EAST /WEST 112 SECTION LINE 7/42/43 BURNS ROAD BEARING BASE S88'43'1 6"E S01'33'35 "W (VARYING R/W WIDTH) 30.00' 434.53' M PERPETUAL UTILITY EASEMENT S88'43'1 6"E O.R.B. 7246, PG. 1833 S88'43'16 "E — 110.97' + _ _ NO 1'1 644 E —S88' 5 V41 "W 4.69' I I 10' ISOUTH R/W P.O.B. LINE OF J N.W. CORNER n BURN'S ROAD I O.R.B. 7619, Pt �t 7'�- �0 I 0 U w L, 0 L I w Z I I IOFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 7619, PAGE 1319 LEGEND d PARENT TRACT I.D. 52434207000007290 P_O.C_ =POINT OF I Q' COMMENCEMENT. P.O.B. =POINT OF I m 1 BEGINNING. 1 R/W = RIGHT OF 16 SECTION 7 WAY. 0 TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH O. CENTERLINE. w RANGE 43 EAST O.R_B.= OFFICIAL w RECORDS BooK. PG. =PAGE. PALM B EACH CO U NTY, FLORIDA I � w 2000 LBFH Inc. SURVEYOR AND MAPPER'S SIGNATUPE 1. UNLESS IT BEARS THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED SELL CF A FI,ORIOA LICENSED SU OR ANO MAPPER, THIS MAP /REPORT IS ; Otl :NFOP,MA'tI7n:AL PURPOSES Y ANO IS NOT 2. NO S�O THE C COROS HAS BEEN Mk9E BY THIS OFFICE. /� -- )OH " A. WILSON, PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER T E OF FLORIDA NO. 5157 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS. SURVEYORS 8 MAPPERS "Partners For Results, INC. Value By Design" 3550 S.W. Corporate Parkway, Polm City. Florida 34990 (561) 286 -3883 Fax: (561) 286 -3925 BPR do F8PE License No: 959 www.Ibfh_com THIS IS NOT A SURVEY E-I O z PROJECT NAME: BURNS ROAD WIDENING WEST PHASE Sccic: 1 " =40' REVISIONS: 4/26/2000 TEP R ?r`P.ING Sheet 1 Of 2 Field Book: N/A I Page: N/A` , N/A Computed: ,JAW I Date FILE NO. Checked: OHD 104/21/2000 P- 729.OWG Project No. 00 -4107 L „"_Zft SURVEYOR'S NOTES: 1. THE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY AS DETERMINED FOR THE PORTION OF BURNS ROADS FROM MILITARY •TRAIL TO RIVERSIDE DRIVE INTERPRETED FROM: A) RIGHT OF WAY MAPS FOR INTERSTATE 95, VILITARY TRAIL B) PALM BEACH COUNTY SURVEY DEPARTMENT S TOWNSHIP AND RANGE SURVEY CONTROL MAPS C) EXISTING RECORDED INSTRUMENTS FOR PARCELS AND EASEMENTS COMPILED FROM A SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS PERFORMED BY SOUTH FLORIDA TITLE SERVICES, INC., 215 EAST OCEAN BLVD.. STUART, FLORIDA. THE SEARCH WAS DOCUMENTED WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF MARCH 28, 2000 AT 5:00 P.M. 2. THE BEARING BASE FOR THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND SKETCH AS SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO THE EAST —WEST QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, SAID LINE IS ASSUMED TO BEAR SOUTH 88' 43' 16" EAST AND ALL OTHER BEARINGS ARE RELATIVE THERETO. DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN A PORTION OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID PARCEL COMPRISING A PORTION OF LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK (ORB) 7619, PAGE 1319 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE WEST ONE— QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 7, THENCE SOUTH 01'33'35" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE OF BURNS ROAD (VARYIN•3 WIDTH); THENCE SOUTH 88'43'16" EAST, DEPARTING SAID WEST LINE AND ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 434.53 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE AFORESAID PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN ORB 7619, PAGE 1319 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 88'43' 16 "EAST ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 110.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88'51'41" W, DEPARTING SAID SOUTH RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1 1 1.07 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL AS DESCRIBED IN ORB 7619, PAGE 1319; THENCE NORTH 01'16'44" EAST ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 4.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 260.0 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. © 2000 LBFH Inc. PROJECT NAME: BURN'S ROAD WIDENING THIS IS NOT A SURVEY WEST PHASE _bf CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS do MAPPERS "Partners For Results. INC. Value By Design' 3550 S.W. Corporate Parkway. Palm City. Florida 34990 (561) 286 -3883 FoX: (561) 286 -3925 8PR dr F13PE License No: 959 www.lbfh.com Scale: N/A Sheet 2 Of 2 REVISIONS: Field Book: N/A Page: N/,A ­ _ . u: NIA I Computed: JAW I Date FILE NO. Project No. Checked: OHD 1 04/21/2000 P- 729.DWG 00 -4107 i EAST —WEST 1/4 SECTION LINE _. - I \ S86-01-22"W DELTA — 00- 16'04" RADIUS — 3969.83' LENGTH — 18.56' BURNS _-ROAD (RIGHT —OF —WAY WIDTH VARIES) SOUTH RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE S88-43'15"F N88'43'1 5"W PROPOSED R/W (_EAST RIGHT —OF —WAY LINE OF I -95 PARCEL 5, 61 0.129± WEST- LINE OF = O.R.B.6553, PG.579 x H SO V1 6*42"W 18.47' BEARING BASE S88'43' 15 "E re 303.26' I 1 I 1 I 1 I O.R.8.7200, PG.1645 � UTILITY EASEMENT I I 742 -1 8 S. F. 12 -L- I ACRES WEST LINE OF O.R.B.1637, PG.579 z OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6553, P. PARNT TRACT I.D. 5243420700uuui4Zu SCALE: > "= 50' I SECTION 7 TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH RANGE 43 EAST PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGEND: O.R -B.= OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK PG.= PAGE S.F.= SQUARE FEET © 2000 LBFH Inc. I THIS IS NOT A SURVEY SURVEYOR AND MAPPER'S SIGNATURE PROJECT NAME: 1. UNLESS IT 8 THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAiSEG !;C/.L LF a FLORIDA LICENSED SU AND MAPPER, THIS MAP /REPORT !-- F0 z INFt0A!JAT1%VA, BURNS ROAD WIDENING PURPOSES ON IS NOT VALID. 2. NO SEAR O / %i�UBUC�S BEEN :dnL£ t�Y THIS OFPSi.E. WEST PHASE - IOHN WILSON PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR Ec MAPPER TAT OF FLORIDA NO. 5157 CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results, INC. Value By Desig- ' 3550 S.W. Corporate Parkway, Palm City, Florida 3499 (561) 286 -3883 Fax: (561) 286 -3925 BPR & FBPE License No: 959 www.(bfh.com 50' :beet 1 Of 2 0 Computed: TEP Checked: OHD i O( REVISIONS: 4/26/2000 TEP "nRRECT - TYPO'S Field Book: N/A Page: rl d: N/A Date FILE NO- Project No. 4/21/2000 P- 742.OWG 00 -4107 SOUTH RIGHT-OF- :vAY BURNS ROAD 4 N RIGHT -OF -.'JAY WIDTH VARIES BURNS ROAD S88'29'38 "E (BASE BEARING) S88'29 *38 "E - 490.26' 00 T N88-29'38 "W I I 494.23' 00 I � 12' a N01'30'22 'E 23.54 FLORIDA POWER 0 &. LIGHT CO. °^' EASEMENT Q.R.B. 3248 m PG. 21 0 Iw Z IJ OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 7983, PAGE 1788 (A PARENT TRACT I.D. 524242- 2000005030 I EAST /WEST 1/1- SECTION LINE 12/42/42 DELTA - _ RADIUS LENGTH RB) / K'! � ,, 579' 42' 23:,w PROPOSED R/W LINE (PARCEL 503 -11 11,559.3 S.F. 0.271 ACRES 00.20'28" 3219.60' 19.17'_ -Ir -- 2I SO1'30.22 4.79' c� a MI ml 0 wl z J :- (A Q E!J SURVEYOR'S NOTES: ix H 1. THE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY AS DETERMIN D FOR THE PORTION OF BURNS ROADS FROM MILITARY TRAIL TO RIVERSIDE DRIVE INTERPRETED FROM: - z A) RIGHT OF WAY MAPS FOR INTERSTATE 95, MILITARY TRAIL B) PALM BEACH COUNTY SURVEY C-7- 'RTMEN"S TOWNSHIP RANGE SURVEY CONTROL MAPS SCALE. C) EXISTING RECORDED INSTRUMENTS FOR P;.RCELE AND EASEMENTS COMF '_ED FROM A SEARCH Or THE PUBLIC RECORDS PERFORMED BY SOUTF' FLORIDA TITLE SERVICES, INC., 215 EAST OCEAN BLVD., STUART, FLORIDA. THE SEARCH WAS DOCUMEI:TED WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF MARCH 28, 2000 AT 5:00 P.M. 2. THE BEARING BASE FOR THE LEGAL DESC IPTION AND SKETCH AS SHOWN HEREON IS REFERENCED TO THE EAST -WEST QUARTER SECTION LINE OF ';ECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, SAID LINE IS ASSUMED TO BEAR SOUTH 88' 43' 16" EAST AND ALL OTHER BEARINGS ARE RELATIVE THERETO. DESCRIPTION THE NORTH 23.54 FEET OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 7983, PAGE 1788 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 11,559.3 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. SECTION 12 LEGEND TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH RANGE 42 EAST O.R.B. = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK. R/W = - RIGHT -OF -WAY. PALM BEACH COUNTY PG.= PAGE S.F. _ SQUARE FEET FLORIDA C/L = CENTERLINE. RB = P;DIAL BEARING. OC 2000 LBFH Inc. THIS IS NOT A SURVEY SURVEYOR AND MAPPER'S SIGNATURE 1. UNLESS IT BEARS THE SIGNATURE AND ORIGINAL RAISED S'Et.L `if*, A 4LORIDA LICENSED SURVEYO ANO MAPPER, THIS MAP /REPORT IS FO'_ '.NFORMATIOK61 _ PURPOSES ONLY 0 S NOT VALID 2. NO SEARoi�7 HAS BEEN A79DE L•'! THIS OfFiCE. JOHN A� ILSON,PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR & MAPPER 'TATE r FLORIOA NO. 5157 mCONSULTING rp CIVIL ENGINEERS, Cale: 1 80' SURVEYORS & MAPPERS "Partners For Results. :'iheet 1 Of 1 C value By Design.•' 3550 S.W. Corporate Parkway, Palm City. Florida 14990 FC °�?Puted: JAW (561) 286 -3883 Fax: (561) 286 -3925 8PR do FBPE License No- 959 www.lbfh.com t- hecked: OHD PROJECT NAME: BURNS ROAD WIDENING WEST PHASE REVISIONS: 4 26 2000 TEP Field Book: N/A Page: N/A Date FILE NO. 4/21/2000 P- 503.OWG 0 - -J'S N/A Project No. 00 -4107 • is d CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: 05/08/00 Meeting Date: 05/18/00 Subject/Agenda Item Burns Road Improvements Recommendation /Motion: Consider a motion to move forward with Burns Road improvements. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ 0 Council Action: (Total) City Attorney Finance [ ] Approved $ 0 [ ] Approved w/ Finance Current FY conditions [ ] Denied ACM Advertised: Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Other Date: [ ] Operating Attachments: Paper: [ X ] Not Required [ ] Other Memorandum Submitted by: DA Kent R. Olson KNV Department Director Affected parties [ ] Notified Budget Acct. #: [ ] None Approved by: City Manager N [ X ] Not required BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. Mimi • • �-1 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM -Xtr TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: May 8, 2000 APPROVED: Nabar E. Martinez, City Managerpp- FROM: Kent R. Olson, Finance Director i `i o SUBJECT: Burns Road Improvements BACKGROUND The construction of the PGA Flyover and the resurfacing of PGA Boulevard to Prosperity Farms Road during the next few years will have a significant negative impact upon east -west traffic movement within the City of Palm Beach Gardens. The widening of Burns Road from Military Trail to Riverside Drive (west end) and from Gardens East Drive to Prosperity Farms Road (east end) will provide significant relief if the project is undertaken quickly. Further, the current traffic volumes show that the two lane sections of Burns Road are at, or approaching, level of service failure. DISCUSSION The estimated cost for the Burns Road improvements is $7 million. The City has $784,000 in previously collected road impact fees that can be utilized for the project. The County has $341,000 left in its Burns Road improvement account that also may be used, plus possibly an additional $300,000 in impact fees that are not yet committed. The County funding needs to be secured with an Inter -local Agreement. This leaves a balance of between $5.6 to $5.9 million needed to fund the remaining costs of the road improvements. Below I have outlined the options available to close this gap. 1. Request developers pay their County road impact fees upfront to fund the project. At its current level of service, Burns Road will fail shortly with the additional trips from new development. If developers raise the funds to cover the shortfall in funding ($5.9 million), the widening project can proceed and concurrency can be met. The developers will receive County road impact fee credits for the contributions they make for the Burns Road improvements. These funds would be paid to the City, and we would be responsible for completing the project. At the Regular Council Meeting of May 4, County Engineer George Webb endorsed the idea of the developers providing the funding voluntarily and receiving impact fee credit, noting it would be a more favorable method than the traditional collection of impact fees. -o171 • 2. Activate Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District Unit 28 to fund the construction improvements. This alternative would have the Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District ( NPBCID) fund the widening of Burns Road. NPBCID would issue bonds (probably with a 20 year repayment) to finance the $5.9 million gap and manage the construction project. The advantage of this approach is that the City would not be utilizing any funds beyond the $784,000 it has on hand. The downside is that the landowners in Unit 28 would pay for the improvements over a twenty -year period with non -ad valorem taxes. This means our future residents would pay a portion of the cost of these improvements, rather than the developers, as these future residents purchase their new homes. The NPBCID would need 190 days before they could issue debt, thus the City may need to provide some interim financing until Northern issues the bonds for the project. 3. Adopt a City road impact fee and provide for a combination of options 1 and 2. There are several thoroughfare linkages outlined in the Transportation Task Force Study presented at the May 4 Regular Council Meeting. The total improvements to City roads through buildout, including Burns Road, is estimated at just over $17.1 million. A City road impact fee would generate the funds needed to provide these improvements. The City could issue City road impact fee credits for the parcels which contributed upfront to the Burns Road improvements (either directly or through the activation of Unit 28). These City road impact fees would generate funds for these future linkages and not reduce the amount of County road impact fees that would be available for the area. A City road impact fee would require a study that would take three to four months to complete and cost between $10,000 and $15,000. 4. Issue general obligation bonds to fund the construction of improvements. This option was suggested at the April 17, 2000 Regular Council Meeting. If we assume we were able to get this issue on the ballot for November 2000, and the referendum passed, we would not have enough time to complete the improvements before the worst of the traffic problems occur on PGA Boulevard. If we choose to take this issue to referendum, we should plan to construct the improvements after the PGA Flyover and PGA Boulevard resurfacing projects are completed. This will also postpone development since some projects will fail to get concurrency. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends on proceeding with the right -of -way acquisition for the Burns Road improvements now in order to alleviate traffic problems due to the PGA construction work. Additionally, staff seeks approval to move forward with implementing a City road impact fee. 0 1 %,r�- 0) 01 n S n� m N Cf rt s A N O O O O Ul i!9 N N V O O O O n to C 0 r. m O r 0) m -1 y m 0 'O o 0 3 07 w m O W v 3 O Z O CL CL rt 7 CL CD Q m � x ,0.' C m n O N 3 m - t o m O 0 m m � , W a < 3 o x C p 07 '�' w 3 x m 0 d 3 H O w N 3 d OM 3 j A N M A A A A m d m V a a d 00 O O O OD O O O O O C Q A) O O O O O i!9 N N V O O O O n to C 0 r. m O r 0) m -1 y m 0 'O v m 0 3 07 w m O W W m n •< c 7 3 CL x ,0.' C m n O N 3 m - t o m O 0 m m � , W a < 3 o x C p 07 '�' w 3 x m -T1 d 3 H O w N 3 d OM 3 j A N n C o 3 a m d m V a a d co y .N+ N N O C Q A) 0) a N go 7 A m W = 3 m c a m 3 - a to d C — 3 _ M a .x► mN m a a c� 69 N — b9 ffl f GJ A_ w J W W w " W 6s ffl w� of w cn CT f00 O CD m N C(0 � O O ul A p` O O O co O O O O O O O CD O O O O O O O Cl CD O CD O CD O O Cl CD CD O O O O O O a O O O O O O O O N A o W 6j v p x CA C O e�1 0 O O0 ,n 0 ( O\ (r 0 Sp CD W p � v N Q -p .y. ° v Q x N O m O m � -� O N 7 CD <' m m y m o D ( n iu CD m m C1 va, c CD M. 'o CD n 0) D '0 'a O �' Cn = � C CD 1 w r CD N �_• � v (O SU _ o �_ s m CD O v Q S fl) O (n ID (D a CD _� w CD D w c v 3 CD n 0 c` o v < = m m c 3 O � -n :3 Ch < Go ap CD CL CD � n � n CL M i v m 52 m - c CL m Q) = v n CL CD CD �D cfl cQ o o (p a 0 a, < 69 m N CD 00 • V CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: 05/08/00 Meeting Date: 05/18/00 Subject/Agenda Item PGA Flyover Improvements Recommendation /Motion: Consider a motion to move forward with PGA Flyover improvements. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ 0 Council Action: (Total) City Attorney Finance [ ] Approved $ 0 [ ] Approved w/ Finance Current FY conditions [ ] Denied ACM Advertised: Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Other Date: [ ] Operating Attachments: Paper: [ X ] Not Required [ ] Other Memorandum Submitted by: �j Kent R. Olson K f\V Department Director Affected parties [ ] Notified Budget Acct. #: ( ] None Approved by: City Manager [ X ] Not required BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. • �J * CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: May 8, 2000 APPROVED: Nabar E. Martinez City e Mana g FROM: Kent R. Olson, Finance Director KRO SUBJECT: PGA Flyover Improvements BACKGROUND The City of Palm Beach Gardens has asked the Florida Department of Transportation to include certain improvements for the PGA Boulevard Flyover project scheduled to begin next year. The FDOT has asked the City to provide funding for some of these improvements requested. If the City wishes these improvements to be included in the final specifications, the City must provide FDOT with the needed funds ($4.3 million) no later than October 31, 2000. The City has explored various options to obtain the necessary funds. However, a decision is needed at the May 18 Regular Council Meeting to provide us with enough time to implement a plan to meet the October 31 deadline should the Council choose to proceed. Below I will discuss the funding options available for this project. DISCUSSION The City must pay $4.3 million to the Florida Department of Transportation on or before October 31, 2000. The City has the following options for funding this cost. 1. Contribution from the MacArthur /Catafulmo right -of -way dispute. The dispute over the title to the right -of -way required by the State will likely reduce the payment the MacArthur Foundation receives due to its inability to provide a clean title for the property to the State. Unfortunately, it doesn't appear likely that the situation will result in the City receiving a donation or exaction from this dispute large enough to satisfy our obligation with the DOT. Of course, if the dispute is not resolved shortly, it is very likely the Flyover project will be postponed until the issue is resolved and funding is again appropriated by the State. 2. Contribution or exaction from the landowners which will benefit from the construction of the Flyover. • The City created the Flyover Task Force a year ago with representatives from commercial interests (Catafulmo Construction, Gardens Mall, etc.) that will benefit by the beautification proposed for the project. We could ask these interests to provideohl' • City with the funds necessary to pay for the improvements which they have helped design and guide. However, it is unlikely that these landowners will agree to pay the full cost of the improvements, leaving the City to fund a portion of the costs. 3. Create a special assessment area that defines the benefiting property owners and issue debt that will be repaid from a non -ad valorem tax upon these properties annually, overlaid by a tax increment financing district to pay for the City's share of the improvements. The special assessment district can also be set up to provide an annual funding source for maintenance of the improvements. This option would require the City to hire attorneys and consultants to determine the justification, methodology and amount of the improvements which shall be borne by each benefiting property. The City would issue debt backed by the non -ad valorem taxes paid by the property owners. The tax increment financing (TIF) district would allow the increased assessed value of these same benefiting properties (as they are developed) to be used to pay back the debt. The TIF establishes a baseline property value (for example, the assessed value as of January 1, 2000) that will continue to be utilized to pay the taxes levied by the City to go toward continuing operations as if these properties had their assessed value frozen. The assessed value above this baseline would pay the taxes levied by the City, but these tax monies would go to fund the TIF District. The City can decide how much of the taxes raised by the TIF District will go towards the repayment of the debt. For example, the City could decide to have 100% of the funds raised be used to retire the debt or only 50% of the funds raised to be utilized. 4. Borrow funds and repay from general revenues or a pledged revenue source. The City could borrow money and repay the funds from general revenues or a specific revenue source (e.g., sales tax or electricity franchise revenues). However, such an option would ultimately raise taxes since any revenue pledged would have to be replaced with another revenue source in the budget. This option would spread the cost of the Flyover improvements to all the taxpayers of the community. 5. Receive additional funds from the State. With the Legislative Session ended on May 5, the likelihood of additional funds prior to the October 31, 2000 deadline is virtually non - existent. There is a chance the State may provide an appropriation to help fund (fully or partially) the project during next year's legislative session. While this may reduce the ultimate cost of the project, we will still need a plan to generate $4.3 million by October 31, thus this is not a feasible option to solve our predicament. RECOMMENDATION • Staff recommends proceeding with the hiring of special legal counsel and consultants to be paid by the special assessment area and move forward with the PGA Flyover enhancements. o l 7 • CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: May 11, 2000 Meeting Date: May 18, 20000 Subject/Agenda Item Bulletin Board(s) for City Hall Recommendation /Motion: Determination of Bulletin Board Placement Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ Council Action: To be determined after City Attorney Administration receiving Council [ ] Approved direction. Finance $_ [ ] Approved w/ Current FY conditions ACM [ ] Denied Other Funding Source: ( ] Continued to: Advertised: Construction Budget Attachments: Date [ ] Operating Paper: Post [ ] Other Memorandum [ ] Not Required X Submitted by: Carol Gold Department Director Affected parties [ ] Notified Budget Acct. #: [ ] None Approved by: City Manager [ X ] Not required BACKGROUND: It has come to my attention that this facility does not have a specific area for posting City notices for public information such as meeting notices, etc. I would like to purchase one or more bulletin boards for that purpose. For legal sufficiency, we could post notices on the interior or exterior of this building. We may also use more than one location in or on the exterior of this building. • C M E M O R A N D U M WATTERSON, HYLAND & KLETT, P.A. To: Carol Gold, City Clerk From: Leonard Rubin, City Attorney Subject: Bulletin Board File No: 319.058 Date: April 28, 2000 I am in receipt of your memorandum dated April 24, 2000, wherein you requested guidance as to the placement of bulletin boards within the City Hall complex. As you are aware, the posting of notices and calendars on bulletin boards within the municipal complex is a customary way of providing notice of events occurring within the City, most notably meetings of the City Council and various City boards and commissions. In fact, there are certain circumstances under which notices posted at City Hall are required to satisfy specific statutory notice requirements, such as the posting of notices of code violations pursuant to Chapter 162, Florida Statutes. There is little, if any, legal guidance as to the placement of the bulletin boards within City Hall. However, given that the bulletin boards are utilized to provide notice to members of the public and satisfy the City's obligations under the Sunshine law, they should be placed in areas readily accessible to members of the public. While an exterior bulletin board placed at the primary entrance to the municipal complex would provide the most effective means of public notice, I am not aware of any requirement that bulletin boards be accessible at all hours. However, given the multiple entrances to City Hall, it may be advisable to utilize more than one bulletin board. In order to satisfy due process concerns there must be at least one primary location dedicated to the posting of public notices. I suggest that you formulate multiple proposals as to the location of the bulletin boards for presentation to the City Council and all applicable advisory boards. Should you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. PACPWin \History \000417A \443. MC(scw) (319.058) t� 7 -47 VL U J j c (L o U 2' j U) pm LL I Cl) 41 V WaNi co E N IZ a Z C � ll U 0 U a �J \v V r_ M 1 w to v ✓• v V U C > � E N a� � � o Q c o E � c a a� � E a �r0� _ i i (1) o M = L 'i O N O L. 4-J 1 O N N { O Y CU a) ro i N 1 co c L N O of L 1 ro O i N 4 }i 1 o E i _ N 1O E �O n. U IC- j L- I co E N IZ a Z N N 'a Q U +.; 7 cn U C > � E N a� � � o Q c o E � c a a� � E a �r0� _ i i (1) o M = L 'i O N O L. 4-J 1 O N N { O Y CU a) ro i N 1 co c L N O of L 1 ro O i N 4 }i 1 o E i _ N 1O E �O n. U IC- U_ J_ C ao WV � U o U) a U- Q O Z +' Wa O °C U rJ N V t .� c 'L N *' N a) a) N a) o a � a Z Q U cn U C IL aa)i a) *' E +z' N N N 70 O C Q O 0 a) E U � c cr a� E � = O � s U U o M C L- 3 a) L O a) i o 0 U 0 a. o'a�. �C o -lie � _ -0 Cl ;� Q0 -0 0 41 t! o E N o E m m �O E Q0 t H } U J C ao wV T ~C N G N a: '0 LL Q 1 Z *' wa C2' o G W CC U U m a c (D *' E u m .0 � o cQc E 0 0) E N U c p' N °CEN C t U s '0 .. V to O M m C I- :3 N i O N U Q w 4` = Y o N a v E r m N = N .0 +j -0 'a O � � O Q L ro �-+ O � 3 E o E N O 0 '0 0 E Q U H U � � U a s jc EL N N O lac � U o C o N U O cc U � T LL Q a: E �� 1 (): Z 4-J+ r; rn oCO o U ro ° a+j a) o o U +' N [ N 0 Co Z N "Np N 0 co +- 0. Z Q U N 4a U � � U a s � N N O lac o o N U U � � ici a: E �� (): E rn oCO o U ro ° a+j a) m o U +' N [ N 0 Co N "Np N +- a) 41 O 4a 7 E N o E — N N Q o 'C o a 0 s F U m •U I ao WV F— U N L Q o Z *' w Om U c a N co 0 a G J E Z 0 Q U cn U c � N � N � O � Q C O U � c cm --cc " MA V cn o Cl) c rn U o. C s .c U C -0 -'a J E co I- 0 CL N � O m t, o � E LoE�, arc -E o U c 4 C. U f- J ED 7 Q• 7 U � U Go cr Q No Z� W 20) 2� 0 U c a z � t3 a� N T � O Q C O +� N U C m0) N �s v *' c c � o � v �•a� �O 4J N -0 o N •a c� Q�' o4 N o E a o av City of Palm Beach Gardens Three -Year Strategic Plan 2000 -2003 pgAFT CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS THRICE -YEAR STRATEGIC PLAN (FY �2,w�;'�Q -2003) Strategic planning is a continuous process that permits an or g anization to move f orward toward an ' identified result and effectively adapt to changes in the world around us. INTRODUCTION ' The City of Palm Beach Gardens Strategic Plan presents a three -year program that will serve as a guide to moving the City closer to the attainment of a vision for excellence. The document is a compilation ' of all preparatory work necessary to lay the foundation to proceed, as well as a blue print for how to achieve the goals over the next three years. It represents the collective work of staff during strategic planning sessions followed by the work conducted by a strategic planning team. It is a living document ' and, as such, will be amended and augmented as the City progresses toward accomplishment of the Plan. ' Senior staff, including department managers, assistant department managers, and division managers participated in a 1 and %2 day strategic planning session to produce the core draft of the City's Strategic Plan. In preparation for the planning sessions, departments conducted an assessment and analysis of ' their departmental mission and goals, resource, timelines, and the means of evaluation. The strategic planning sessions were conducted with a mind towards developing a single, Citywide comprehensive strategic plan which all department plans would emulate. During the 1 and '/2 day planning session, facilitators led staff through a variety of exercises designed to produce the essence of the plan. The exercises assisted in analysis of the City's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats; development of the City's strategic intent and mission statements; and identification of key result areas, with objectives and strategies. From this group Section I of this document was developed. Following this planning session, a smaller staff team volunteered to take the information from the planning session and compile it into an easily understandable outline. From this group the collation of supportive initiatives for the key result areas from individual departments was also accomplished. These will be seen in Section II of this document. The "acid test" used throughout the planning process can be summarized as "customer- service centered." Every discussion, decision or dilemma was concluded or resolved by measuring the value added to our customer - centered focus, with its emphasis on service to our residents. What Is Strategic Planning? Strategic planning is "a disciplined effort to produce fundamental decisions and actions that shape and guide what an organization is, what it does, and why it does it." Through strategic planning, public and nonprofit organizations can: 2 ❑ Examine the environment in which they exist and operate ❑ Explore the factors and trends that affect the way they do business and carry out their roles ' ❑ Seek to meet their expectations and fulfill their missions Y ❑ Frame the strategic issues they want to address ❑ Find ways to address these issues by re- examining and reworking organizational realities whether ' they be product or service levels, financing, or management and organization ❑ To be effective, strategic planning must be action oriented and must be linked to tactical and operations planning. ' The ABCs of a Continuous Living Process ' Throughout a strategic planning process, there are three fundamental questions that an organization must ask itself: ' A. Who and what are we, what do we do now and why? B. What do we want to be and do in the future and why? ' C. How do we get there from here? Asking and answering these questions requires an ongoing, interactive conversation among strategic ' planning team members and other involved parties. As time goes on and circumstances change, new answers to one question can be expected to change previous answers to other questions. ' The Benefits of Strategic Planning Strategic planning is intended to enhance an organization's ability to think and act strategically. The ' potential benefits from the process are numerous and include: ❖ Increased effectiveness. ' The organization's performance is enhanced, its mission furthered and its mandates are met. In addition, the organization responds effectively to rapidly changing circumstances. I 4- Increased efficiency. The same or better results are achieved, with fewer resources. ' ❖ Improved understanding and better learning. The organization understands its situation far more clearly. It is able to rethink and reformulate options, if necessary, and to establish an interpretive framework that can guide strategy ' development and implementation. •'• Better decision - making. • A coherent, focused, and defensible basis for decision - making is established, and today's decisions are made with the understanding of possible future consequences. 2 ❖ Enhanced organizational capabilities. ' Broadly based organizational leadership is improved and the capacity thought and action is enhanced. F T ;ic ' ❖ Improved communications and public relations. Mission, vision, goals, strategies and action programs are communicated more effectively to key stakeholders. A desirable image for the organization is established and managed. ' This is the beginning of an ongoing strategic planning process. The City has made great strides in formalizing a planning process that identifies issues and mandates accountability. The plan will be ' updated on a periodic basis as we move toward institutionalizing strategic planning throughout every City department. This strategic plan is very straightforward. It starts with a Strategic Intent statement, of how we want to see our City in an ideal world. It incorporates a Mission Statement of what are ' organization is about. From brainstorming our Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats, six Key Result Areas (KRA's) were recognized as priorities. Contained within those KRA's are the ' strategies and initiatives to enable the City to move ahead. Every strategy or initiative is focused on results. Departments and contact people are designated for each initiative. In addition each initiative is timebound with inception and completion dates. ' The Plan attempts to focus on issues that are at the crux of making and maintaining this City as a premier place to live and work. With change and growth, the City was viewed as both as an individual ' entity and as a major municipality in Palm Beach County. As we face future challenges, we must optimize our strengths, correct our weaknesses, manage any threats and pursue opportunities, wherever feasible. This Strategic Plan helps us structure our ability to take a leadership role, gain closure on ' issues of City importance, and move us closer to realizing our vision. While the Key Result Areas identify the broad issues, the strategies selected show how the City will move toward accomplishment. MISSION STATEMENT Through the variety of strategic planning exercises, participants identified traits and characteristics by ' which they believed the City should be identified. The following traits and characteristics were identified as the top priorities: effective, progressive, and professional, while exhibiting integrity and ' integrating technological enhancements. Through additional planning exercises, these traits were developed into a proposed Mission Statement for the City. An effective Mission Statement includes the scope of services of the City and includes the listing of broad categories of service. The proposed Mission Statement for the City of Palm Beach Gardens is as follows: A commitment to provide a superior level of services to the community with qualified and responsive personnel, through innovative planning, effective use of technology and responsible management of natural resources. 3 4 STRATEGIC INTENT STATEMENT DKP Strategic Intent reflects the Mission Statement. Strategic Intent also present the preferred image of the ' City in an ideal world. The Strategic Intent should also be a statement that exhibits the following characteristics: it is simple, easily remembered, unequivocal (no doubt about it), and should be goal - focused in that the City must strive to reach it. ' The Strategic Intent for the City of Palm Beach Gardens was developed in conjunction with the development of the Mission Statement. The same priorities that comprise the Mission Statement also ' underlie the Strategic Intent. The proposed Strategic Intent: Achieving Excellence... Make It Happen ' and Imagine the Possibilities ' Strengths, Weaknesses Opportunities, and Threats ' Facilitators led staff through the SWOT exercise as a means of brainstorming the City's known strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. The characteristics identified were then narrowed to ' the top five or six for each of the four categories — strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. The list was then again narrowed to identify the top six items of all categories combined. The top five were easily identified and then discussed in greater detail to determine and elaborate future direction for ' these key areas. It was discussed that an additional KRA might be warranted as more of the groups' thoughts were formalized. That indeed took place and a sixth KRA was added later. The items identified comprise the Key Result Areas (KRAs) as the core of the strategic plan. KRAs are broad categories of initiatives that need to be addressed to accomplish the City's Mission and Strategic Intent. They are the road the City must travel to realize the attainment of our vision. ' The six Key Result Areas also include a rationale statement that provides the justification for the critical role that the item will play in the City's future. Each Key Result Area is then further clarified or mapped out in terms of specific objectives as well as time -based actions (strategies) to achieve those ' objectives. All Key Result Areas are placed in the context of a customer - centered focus, i.e. maintaining or developing a superior level of service for our residents. 4 Key Result Areas PSAF, ■ To provide for the proactive exchange of information and sense o munity among City staff, elected officials and members of the public. • To continually identify community needs and priorities and develop a financial plan that is compatible with their expectations. • To become proactive in implementing the latest technology in providing quality services to the community. • To provide high quality services by maintaining a well- trained and experienced workforce. • To provide effective capital facilities for the optimal provision of services. • To provide a safe, secure and attractive environment incorporating partnerships between the City and its communities, businesses and citizens. 5 liclill 0 POFT r F T To provide for the proactive exchange of information among City staff, elected officials, and members of the community so as to enhance the delivery of Citv services. The exchange of information is a critical component of effective government. (OBJECTIVE Al To solicit and evaluate information from the community and community groups to identify level of service expectations. STRATEGIES 1. Maintain quarterly community meetings. Responsibility: Public Information and Citizen Services Timeline: Ongoing; three times a year 2. Complete compilation of HOA survey (previously conducted) and distribute findings. Responsibility: Public Information and Citizen Services Timeline: Begin: January 1999; Complete: July 2000 3. Conduct citizen survey. Responsibility: Public Information and Citizen Services Timeline: Begin: October 2000. Complete: December 2000 4. Expand City services survey to include the business community. Timeline: Begin: October 2001. Complete: December 2001 5. Conduct citizen survey every or every other year following initial survey and compare to baseline survey. Timeline: Begin: Every October or every other October. Complete: Every December or every other December. 7 8 OBJECTIVE BI To inform community groups in a timely manner of Citywide issues importance to ensure a complete understanding of City operations and functions. STRATEGIES 1. Take full advantage of Citywide community meetings to share information on upcoming issues. Responsibility: Public Information and Citizen Services Timeline: Ongoing; three times a year 2. Utilize Public Participation Plan as outlined in the City's Communication and Marketing Plan. Responsibility: Public Information and Citizen Services Timeline: Begin: March 2000; Complete: 2003 3. Develop a speaker's bureau program. Responsibility: Public Information and Citizen Services Timeline: Begin: July 2000; Program in place by September 2000 and ongoing 4. Offer assistance to neighborhoods seeking to organize which will assist the City in the effort to disseminate information. Responsibility: Public Information and Citizen Services Timeline: Begin Development of plan: July 2000; Implement by October 2000 OBJECTIVE To improve the exchange of information among members of City staff in order to accomplish the City's mission. STRATEGIES 1. Share issues of importance stemming from department staff meetings with all other departments through the use of informational emails. Responsibility: All Department Directors Timeline: Begin: Immediately; Ongoing; include in yearly performance evaluations. 2. Conduct training of all staff in need of email training. Responsibility: MIS Division Timeline: Begin: July 2000; Complete by October 2000 8 3. Revise performance evaluations to include communication effectiven s Responsibility: Performance Evaluation Team established by er 9 Timeline: Begin: February 2000; Complete: October 200 (OBJECTIVE DI To develop an effective partnership between City staff and elected officials to facilitate the formulation of City policy. STRATEGIES 1. Respond to City Council's requests for information within 24 hours. Responsibility: All Departments Timeline: Begin: Effective Immediately; Ongoing 2. Ensure that responses to Council requests made at Council meetings are answered at the next City Council meeting, in addition to providing a 24 -hour individual response. Responsibility: All Departments Timeline: Begin: Effective Immediately; Ongoing 3. Ensure that City Council receives timely notification and invitations to all City events. Responsibility: City Manager's Office; Department Directors Timeline: Begin: Effective Immediately; Ongoing (OBJECTIVE 4 To promote the City's mission and portray a positive City image. STRATEGY: 1. Implement the Communication and Marketing Plan. Responsibility: All Departments Timeline: Begin: Effective Immediately; Ongoing with all elements of the plan in operation by 2003 6 gAFT Identify community needs and priorities and develop a Financial Plan that is compatible. The critical aspect of this initiative is to determine what the community wants and directly link their ' needs to a planned program for identifying revenue sources and projecting the expenditure of public funds. I JOBJECTIVE Al ITo seek community input to determine needs and priorities. ' STRATEGIES 1. Analyze data from Homeowner's Association survey. ' Responsibility: Public Information and Citizen Services Timeline: Begin Analysis: June 2000; Complete; July 2000 2. Include neighborhood - related questions in Citywide resident survey. Responsibility: Public Information and Citizen Services Timeline: Begin: October 2000; Complete: December 2000; thereafter yearly or ' every other year 3. Seek community input through additional means such as Council meetings and staff attendance ' at HOA monthly meetings. Responsibility: All Departments Timeline: Begin: Immediately; Complete: ongoing ' 4. Encourage neighborhood organization to facilitate communications (as mentioned in KRA #1). Responsibility: Public Information and Citizen Services ' Timeline: Begin plan development: July 2000; Implement: October 2000 10 I (OBJECTIVE BI ITo identify all available existing and alternative sources of funds. ' STRATEGIES 1. Seek grants and other forms of financial aid. ' Responsibility: All Departments Timeline: Begin process: April 2000; Ongoing 2. Develop new sources of revenue. Responsibility: All Departments Timeline: Begin process: April 2000; Ongoing 3. Examine potential uses of debt funding. Responsibility: Finance Department Timeline: Begin: Immediately; Complete: August 2000 ppAF1 4. Examine existing resources and their correlation to community needs and priorities. Responsibility: City Manager; Finance; Assistance from all Departments Timeline: Begin: March 2000; Complete: October 2000; ongoing (OBJECTIVE C To develop a financial planning process that recognizes the competition for funds in meeting community needs and provides flexibility in allocation of funds during the planned period based on changing needs (and a process that is correlated with the needs identified by the community). STRATEGIES Use an interdepartmental work group to evaluate individual department budgets and their synergy and/or impacts on other departments. Responsibility: Budget Team as appointed by the City Manager Timeline: Begin: May 2000; Complete: September 2000 2. Develop a budget process that provides for quarterly review and re- allocation of funds to meet unanticipated expenditures and changing community needs. Responsibility: Finance Department Timeline: Begin: October 2000; Ongoing 11 F T To become proactive in implementing the latest technology in providing quality services to the communitv. The utilization of technology should continually improve and support the quality of service delivery. (OBJECTIVE Al To enhance the dissemination of information to and from the community. STRATEGIES 1. Develop a city -based web site for interactive communication, service delivery models, and city information. Responsibility: Public Information and MIS Timeline: Begin: April 2000; Complete: January 2001 and ongoing 2. Achieve interactive elements on City web site. Responsibility: MIS and Public Information Timeline: Begin: January 2002; Complete: December 2002 OBJECTIVE .# To develop the City's Wide Area Network system (W.A.N.). STRATEGIES 1. Conduct a departmental needs assessment and establish timeline for implementation. Responsibility: MIS Timeline: Begin: April 2000; Complete: September 2000 12 2. Secure funding sources through budget and grants and alternative so 3 Responsibility: Finance and MIS Timeline: Begin: July 2000; Complete: October 2000 OBJECTIVE C To broadcast City meetings /City programming on cable access television - broadcast web casts. STRATEGIES 1. Secure public access /government/community channel, through cable franchise agreement Responsibility: Growth Management staff Timeline: Begin: March 2000; Complete: January 2001 2. Evaluate staffing needs to ensure coordination of City programming. Responsibility: Staff team assigned by City Manager Timeline: Begin: October 2000; Complete: January 2001 3. Implement City programming. Responsibility: Staff team assigned by City Manager Timeline: Begin: January 2001; Complete: March 2002 13 F � To provide high quality services by maintaining a well- trained and experienced workforce. The loss of experienced employees will negatively impact the delivery of services and performance of the organization. (OBJECTIVE Al To enhance performance management and accountability. 1. Research, develop and institute a Citywide comprehensive employee appraisal system. Responsibility: Human Resources with assistance from Employee Appraisal Team established by the City Manager Timeline: Begin: February 2000; Complete: June 2001 2. Communicate and agree to clear goals and objectives for the employee and department. Responsibility: Human Resources and all Departments Timeline: Begin: October 2000; Complete: September 2001 3. Research and develop a program designed to empower and encourage all employees to increase productivity. Responsibility: Human Resources and assigned staff Timeline: Begin: October 2000; Complete: December 2000 IOBJECTI VE BI To develop comprehensive policies and procedures. 1. Ensure that the organizational policies and procedures manuals are distributed to the workforce. Responsibility: Human Resources Timeline: Begin: April 2000; Complete: September 2000 2. Create policies that are reviewed and updated annually to promote interdepartmental equity. 14 Responsibility: Human Resources; Labor Attorney Timeline: Begin: April 2000; Complete: January 2001 OBJECTIVE C1 To improve retention and recruitment practices. �pFT 1. Conduct a compensation and benefits study. Responsibility: Human Resources and Outside Consultants Timeline: Begin: April 2000; Complete: July 2000 2. Develop an education and training plan for each employee. Responsibility: Human Resources Timeline: Begin: January 2001; Complete: January 2002 3. Expand the teamwork awards program to recognize outstanding performance. Responsibility: Human Resources with assistance from Communication Team Timeline: Begin: July 2000; Complete: December 2000 15 F T To provide efficient and effective facilities for the oimal provision i services. In order to provide a superior level of service, an assessment of all existing City facilities must be conducted to determine current capacity and future needs. OBJECTIVE Al To Conduct Needs Assessment of all City facilities. 1. Create a City Facilities Team. Responsibility: Public Works Department with assistance from other City staff. Timeline: Begin: July 2000; Complete: October 2000 2. Obtain data and input (citizens, departments, and employee input). Responsibility: Public Works Timeline: Begin: July 2000; Complete: October 2000 3. Prioritize survey data and input. Responsibility: Public Works Timeline: Begin: July 2000; Complete: October 2000 OBJECTIVE BI To develop plan for implementation of identified priorities. 1. Identify funding, exploring all options, including innovative uses of existing facilities. Responsibility: Public Works Timeline: Begin: July 2000; Complete: October 2000 2. Acquire property and/or identify locations. Responsibility: Public Works; Finance; City Attorney Timeline: 3 -6 Months, depending on decisions for facilities 3. Complete design phase. Responsibility: Public Works, Finance; City Attorney, City Engineer; Contractor Timeline: 6 -9 Months, depending on decisions for facitities 16 4. Complete bid process. Responsibility: Public Works, Finance, City Attorney Timeline: 3 Months 5. Complete construction. Responsibility: Contractor Timeline: Varying, depending on project. pOFT 17 F T To provide a safe, secure, and attractive environnWnt incorporating partnerships between the City and its communities, businesses, and citizens. A safe and secure environment that is aesthetically pleasing is one that flourishes and possesses a quality of life that will make citizens proud. OBJECTIVE Al To enhance the physical safety and security of our citizens and their property through information dissemination and innovative programs. See Part II Organizational Strategies for individual initiatives. OBJECTIVE BI To improve and maintain the City's physical environment through streetscape designs, open space planning, and continuity in residential and commercial areas. See Part II Organizational Strategies for individual initiatives. OBJECTIVE To focus efforts to encourage partnerships with a variety of City interests to positively impact the City's appearance and quality of life. See Part II Organizational Strategies for individual initiatives. 18 %16m J2 dam COD elm ' Q ' O C V � C � M �WED� x bA 'C o � 6 " ON 1 r by ❑ Q y • '.. N O CN QL O � O t. CL AMEN at � O AO ti N � r A` ❑ by �� � •N O � N� N r N to Q N .� N O a �W o C a� °'. o o w a n° o i v -°'o E r - b o °�' o 0 A. °' 0 — U _ ago° �k,N n0 0 r °o cv? a O ,. c°CD °v os o O o U ° U U Cd �, U '�' U w' co r • , .0 cd O ❑ iL .ri R �j t., N c�!�" .w «S � y Aw w r �. ago w 3 wN n w W 3 a ° C4 b 3 cn o o f a .r RS v1 U U Vl �-. CC VJ 1 N � G C14 / 0 \ � < � 7 \/ Fcf 0 /~ . \ � G k Q w \A � 3 o § o [ ® a § � § \a G� � ± ; t /% k# G\ � G C14 `L U W ' zH a� 1 �p 1 w�N � gu � Hti O � a w � o 1 a 1 1 � 1 on.� 'b 'b •c 0 bq O. ti 3 F, 3 �� o a� Q >, U on.� 'b 'b •c 0 �� 3 �•� 3 a•L 3 �� o a� Q on.� 'b 'b •c �� 3 �•� 3 a•L 3 �� o a� Q M N Q o �° g45 a•o 3.�o o0 -�s ° •c .� -o o .� b ° 3 4 C 3 3 U U a ¢ as cd � o 3 aj 40. 3 a, ci on 3 ,�,a '� V) �.� cn a > a 0: E a f a a •� 0 3 M N I-r C14 \ 0 / § k $ �3\ k 2 2 k m # Q u /w \ 2 2 Q \ / � K »§ �§ �/5 2 § )t 7 G / \ f /� % §40/ ƒk2 \ 4. tw \ \ / ■ C e C 1 F F l' aW H \ H O W� l O CIO O a n N s~ bn.� � � •O O P o Q O U O O O O O N N N 'b bA 'perp on aW aW �s V] v Cd °o "1 a� � .a 0 In Q b ti b O b FE ° U O y s°� s� cd ti a�i o A. °co,? � � V�w F-11 L � q \ \ > /Q / \ � / / » \ � \/ k . C $ � 6 a k § 4 k o aE Q�q / /c \�# �\� § \ 2•§ 7 ©5 / d d k % § ®) t as a 2 to 'S. & m e § §_ � _ k ° c U © e 2 , t�J§A < a t S E / u 2 ]�� C3 Q \ � k / ra of / o c « b;$jg� §&ate O o 0 e S �bo . 2 "E 0 e o 0.0 a c 2 > ± e \\ \ /d / F-11 L � q `L U � C7 ao yH aU w 1 �o � a a w ' O pp b b b p CD 'C7 O "' b4 O❑ bA O O bq O Q O N (D p y0 NO D O D O D O y N >+ cl N N N w 9 � O >, >1 O S O ti ti ti ti O °o op °o po po N N N N N V] C? I I Qcd i a w .N a" w N p" 40, ..UN, a co t°v U y N U U aUi U U a v v U r- C14 bo I f I I I I i i ti U y N U y N U U aUi U U O -U v v U U U O co I V1 W" fC i/� W" I R I Vi al I � c� O W C � • c� U � ac cl �-x w O v�.� c �n •a. .d n� V) w o Q. o ,� r- C14 00 N V�w L ?: o y w �> 0 a� a� own °' CO aQ v) O O 1 N �O+ U414 E O ti ' U N O Ile N O U QaN � U O O o a cv Q U � O U o N_ p �z g opp� N d 69 idd ' � N o c 2 � >' W a 010 z a cd vOi o c -c U rn u L ?: o y w �> 0 a� a� own °' CO aQ v) OA N E O U p Ile N O O O QaN O N L ?: o y w �> 0 a� a� own °' CO aQ v) O U � ~ w Q V 4 U O O o a cv N U -fl N V L ?: o y w �> 0 a� a� own °' CO aQ v) i rn N o a cv b o oq ° o N_ p o ' W C ' cv a> . � a -= a W w° H cv co c'a O s. t a U �, V :d a" . .5 0 aXi vii .2 10 10 a0i O to O to U N v� y C g W W cd Q ' o a o W o o i rn N W, lt,171 a I' U Q bq C bq �O �O 0 A 0 NC bOA ¢ N O O O N N O Hh � °a 1 � w ' O s a I' M Q bq C bq �O �O 0 A 0 NC bOA ¢ N O O O N N O G, U M c�O �O �O caC> ca(0 N O N N N N G, � ar Ob -� Cd U O O O O U U U U U U � b b O O O z z b boo o Cd F. O O LL V a> C tZ 4, "0 p +°. " L) O t= O y Uy a� Au H =1 W n ice, F- . awi W N 3 o —0 ; Vol . b o ce Al o a o b �;U C.)U °o.�00w aa)i cd 0 E 42 p �-' ��' ca O p ' ° O O N W H v p O^ H. L O y H Ts y y 3 W e O O, v U M C 2 O w ^� y > O to o O 6 °tea cn t ' b o w a. 3 i; U ° c Obi c ° U a� a n i s U P. U U M o 00 2 a �o w v bA bA >~ wo p � 0 0 p O o O O o 00 2 a �o w v w v w v >~ wo �. w . wb o (D � v N U S N 0 o U a o U a. w a U a U U 1 I ---------- 4--- 4 I a N M o (D ❑ cd � p cd a 0 � th > O a� � .� � ., > *. >, > O Q 0. o7o.0 � W U U Q a� O a> cc a> M t0 Y O 0 C b 0 e 0 `e '" 0. O O C� '"•� i C" 0 A o ' � b .b • aCi > O. > a >~ a a �a >> c a Div U W U W �cX A a 5 o E ai ai cad c0i v o ° 0 In 0 3 0 0wa U U r b O y c0 O O 1. O 0 y w •� 0 � U sNs�� �N. � y id � L'• � 0 as N M � � � k \ c L \ 5 \ � r o w . r £ . = G Sk u � / u \ \ 3 / Cf C 7 & I ƒ¢ \a / rro / / # -10:3 «2 2 "Cl § a\ & » u 7 b 9A 23 \g0 =0"J \ / \ / E > $ % © k ® g { o �- { U t O » c % o m S° » met§2§ �,» u 0— \/I �k§k)/ @ `L U 1 �U aAo � �ao � �w 1 �o � a w � O 1 a M 1 1 Nb0A O pOn bn � p O O O O C k. O L,, •o c� k, v c� Gi. cd v oo > > a° ao O O 0 0 0 0 0 boon�c o E 0 o >C > Nc v �o O b�oaa� o > Q .a U b � a ca �' E ° yCc> O o E E 3 r. Cd 0 O O O O � Ln N N X v crs a> v p ?! O w Ira M �t- 1 a° ,, w r w� U � •5 b r to bq � O O M O � O � N M 3 a w " ' � c ° U v � o p: cn a° GG =; '� a ... a > U •b U r a p°q ow.� � one• �•� � 3 .54 U > U O p ' r w 3 w c 3> cd r w o . E w .� 0� O }. U N ti O c� Y N N" rW c`c W cad a 1 a° ,, w r w� U � •5 b r to bq � O O M O � O � N M 3 a w Z d'd 0 3 2 a� o U �� U >�USn, O 5 ' .5 a uo O t- 6s c ° U o U U p: cn a° GG =; '� a ... w Z d'd 0 3 2 a� o U �� U >�USn, O 5 ' .5 a uo O t- 6s b cd cd � 3 a� U O b � � a U 4)"a42U CA Ln w ti 0 a� C* O a> W 0 U w •o C ycn � c W U tn M > Wit'' U a > U •b U ❑w ° 0 3 .54 > U O p ' w 3 w c 3> b cd cd � 3 a� U O b � � a U 4)"a42U CA Ln w ti 0 a� C* O a> W 0 U w •o C ycn � c W U tn M Ir i i i i 0 0 N M b O Q� G' O .N N a � w b as U O WPr v O O O l` cn M 69 O O U � cO b �. �'•+ bA o Q N .Li U o •° y w. a: •� N U r o A•, °'t4^ ci J o a�i o co o 91) � y ark �v o a 3ab orb a� U a�� L U�� aE�o■ ■ ■ ■ ■ w 4, o y •� 4,i T �t in �, Q qy U Q O N N N U N iU-. U CL vUi `L C: F" U gu �* W : � zH a °a 1 a w ' O 1 a ' � y M O w � 3 a 0 0 "' 0 ' o a' Ln So �a So .moo c ,fob 0 �UW � 3 � a U 0 U r. a4 C. U 0 0 oA 3 0 o 2 0 O b to N C'T 7a CA CO b M � v ° c� �: on o' r- M Y T ° Q w a O a p y > Q O > sa b A O = > " U Q u a � v �, � � . � v, U �n GL O U w 4) °° y GG a c 4) o tz � ,c � Cd° on U � P. U G a w U E A a U 0 w .O m w o o a r- M Y T ° Q w a O a p y > Q O > sa b A O = > " U Q u a r- M Y T ° b w a C p y G \ r- M �O 0 ~ O a O �O 0 O C w U M O 0 N O O N a� dw u 0 p pw0 p pw 1 �O •�O 0UC7 o o C7 o oUC7 o a0 0 0 bpA 0 ' U U U � o O O i k k" U ~ w o N N N N O ' EA 6 a �O 0 ~ O a O �O 0 O C w U M O 0 N O O N a� dw u ti 42 O ^C o •'S C 'p c as .0 N N b N O V b y > iy , y y .fl ') N ++ n C by m O N o .0 E b p p cl w ca 40. w C N �' b 42 ° 0 O p 0 C :� + cd t w p 0 v v o O O. > :c c a0i � � ? C y > o� .� .� a B o > 6 c � E W 0; p U o W o O p s. ,� W c� .W 00 Cl?) 0 p pw0 p pw 0UC7 o o C7 o oUC7 o oUC7 0 0 0 a 0 � � o tz U U i i k k" U 3 o o N N 3 O EA 6 69 ❑ ❑ ❑ i CA i N GO o N E r. N N o c c °a' i r o o o o � 42 O ^C o •'S C 'p c as .0 N N b N O V b y > iy , y y .fl ') N ++ n C by m O N o .0 E b p p cl w ca 40. w C N �' b 42 ° 0 O p 0 C :� + cd t w p 0 v v o O O. > :c c a0i � � ? C y > o� .� .� a B o > 6 c � E W 0; p U o W o O p s. ,� W c� .W 00 Cl?) 00 Cl?) v, M IrI o°A O ' O OO O Lz. b C, A 0 O ri °o °o N N M �p O O IN M M vw w vw 0 a� ❑�+ N ' V. Cd ot' oA C t� y 4) to °' CL � o n °' `g" . y a0i w b � G � 3 0 cv -0 O r. vO w U iL y O q t., H 3 C -d CC y .� N tom, U •O k •D ° N �" N O. tU. _O •4. Hi U tH N 6' iL y y •�•+- .U. p a. O X O uR O O U .�.J y N a CL N N a+ CL U vUi O H �• O in U= ' Q 3 w° 3 °' a to � 00 c� °' � � � k � ° � u „ v � �• o0A O. c� o > o`boua.�w mow. r�¢QUv ors: a�a U Y O o •� 0 0 N O O O N O �U w � ti 0 N N U 4. CL U U b zw U W N y N N N O 0 bA L." w o .�? ° o o N „p U as U W O ¢ 0 Itt O O N 1 � D\ Z O I O M O O O O N O C� O O N N I � N N r bq C wl � � O w U I o � o M O O O. ,OO O ar y N �O > w o o a.. Q W m O w y �"'' C1. 'O �•' O N y U co +� O y G O N ❑. ra -dp b ^o 0 b U v cd A[ b U CJ fopp v W w ' sa. Q m E �.„ �� a a>i a�i a�i co N � a�i aii 3 o co ' O N U �.� V O ❑a7 C O r. b a0 O ' 0 to O > O > O w E Op 0� 0; �O.O ' U u O on U . W 0 00 °o 00 ° N N N N r O U M� U > N z 0 O N N� > Cl o ti 0 Y V 3 a b � b b a U U U U C w w w w V O V O V O Q a' W C-4 W W N z 69 94 bA .14 V) U bA 4pp., U 4, G" N o 4, 40. CO •o °r w 3 E rA o °o, a�i cv v L In > .b ° N U � zH �o 1 a � w � O ■ 0 00 °o 00 ° N N N N r O U M� U > N z 0 O N N� > Cl o ti 0 Y V 3 a b � b b a U U U U C w w w w V O V O V O Q a' W C-4 W W N z 69 94 bA .14 V) U bA 4pp., U 4, G" N o 4, 40. CO •o °r w 3 E rA o °o, a�i cv v L In > .b ° N o O N U O r� O N b a a) G S iw N No U Op `� s9 M O aNi �, p 0. a0i cl G O O Cs. Op �O Q) N N > N U ai N a�i N M O z /+ U Q m CA F. ti p O Q > >, N w A w y 0 .0 cd CD vO ON �'O ON a�a, a� V O �'O N O o O c a o > a z CJO 0 In a � u v O. �x y 0 0 WQ v)� a�i W A.'rn cn 0 CZ Cd a ¢ a Cd 4co 1 c�Ud "� V cad N O cd y N w w w w a w w w o. .0 >, 0 a c' N n o °A p0° > � O � >a) � a`"i � � � O C U cO 0o q uC) p ai Q b b u w z u w M 69Q a>� r.S roq � � fit G W p U a. ' v� O U v O M O aNi �, p 0. a0i cl G O N Cd Q) a� y o cd p 0 O w +' Q G .b m CA F. y t.' p O Q > >, N w A w y 0 .0 cd `do � a� a�a, a� 3 E4 2 o O c a o > a o -o 0 In a � u v O. �x 0 0 WQ v)� a�i W A.'rn cn 0 CZ Cd Cd 4co 1 c�Ud "� V cad N O cd y N ' .r o ? co a N 7t o. .0 >, 0 a � i � o > � ' � a`"i � � � c W W cd GL w fit G W p U a. ' v� O w v O O N O N O N �° O C v° 0 N 44,, � � O rr O 4- 4. Y N Q N Cc 6s v�vj U�� U�� �6 �� t Q ' U U w w c co I I I crus I I ppO w v .o o � Q 0 a I I I I -o 3 a� •� � cd I 'too O i. .0 w ' 3 i to co o Ca E N Q N E O N �° O C v° 0 N 44,, N N N O 4- 4. N CO Cc 6s v�vj U�� U�� �6 �� CA =$ c co I I I I I ppO N Q Q 0 a I I I I Q I I I I I I O i. O b COi vOi b � •y •v Q A. Q Q p. w° W a�i U G. Q Q Q O O N ti N O O Q N � y U ir. 0° �° �° v° O v° 0 � C) 44,, W W Op0 O Open 4- 4. w� CO Cc 6s v�vj U�� U�� �6 �� 'It 0 =$ c co a I I I I I I w O i. O b COi vOi !� a Q A. Q L1, w p. w° W a�i U G. co a a� Y 5 ono Q k OZ 0 a.aw C c d "ll UU" ., y U > O ^0 N �y�' In N •> F,�•" U H AE > w we ice.. x wk° 'It C) o ° o o v ° M M M N O a`i yN n yN yN N N N ¢ N N b tD to � to N C a co W Q G' w i w w w w oO ° °° O � yC V O O v"iC NO ° cd6s o °U� U� U Uoo GIs G 'IT � a� c� a� b y by a>i L � > rn A w w a �U ' E z ' an o b 0 ; b o ° a'� ° a U 42 00 :b � a. �" i Oo �'•o� C's 'b Oo cli W, 5 0 3 U b ° W a °. U U c W j °' ' c� o U c`d . o � w 3 �q i U ' F U W a �W y� a gz b O O O 7 '0 N O C O cv 0 O O. O a Al w t O x O ■ O 04 �D M N b O O O 7 '0 N O C O cv 0 O O. O Al 0 a W x O M N O C\ y y �' tNt� N Q a O O oU O. C O U N O C. N Al U O a W x U a. a a a a a 0 No Q o o z z wo b b N O b4 U rn rn C ° � cd > Q > Z O Z � w 0 cd y 1. 0. > 2 e z a> W US O. U can O z > z 0 > p H 0 Q vii c> VJ •� _ f: •�+ O ice. '�+ 0 •U bA q y y > y y Q +. o co vi U � .+ CIS a> H a a U i Cd .-. _ O O co „ a a � � U O 0 � ,r � o , 4 �, o � ��. CA a> ' a bon bon ¢ oo too to bon oon to bon O O N O O O Oo O O r. a O to ��. cq N (V /-. 112 'E S S S S S S o a C7 C7 ao z b z 0 � b U '° a a � � U 0 a� 0 C„ Cd p. 0 S v ti U Z � W 1 R 2 GG cad as a i aC v�oi bN i bno�, °.3 cap•'�� a O O� 3 3 o aUtn a a uco o aoi c w U — w _ y :c o Q. =d N vb > $. 40 >' 1 rA .. ; „ o .. 0 r. N - 0 C6> N m > OD co c 0 N CO o o A o o 1 a� >, 3 o° 1 V r— IT on b bn . .� a an o on b bn b bn o on o on r— IT p ' a�i pip N � 0 o O o O f'1 N b0A N b�A O O o U O a+ O N rA Cd �O 0 O o r.� N p ' a�i pip N � o O N b0A N b�A O O o U O a+ O p O O ^" y N Cd r+r o N U Q 'z c U C7 0 0 z H 0 b b b b b b 0 Q U .�-a' � .s > U >� �N ' Cd y 3 a � as w w w'3 b `�°� to QO c � o Qn �u a > H a n� � U U'>U > V a >Q U U V' >U w o, w o co o Z: 4, o ao C: o .. w ao`. � � � � � o & # � « w $ `% d f .0 ? / \ 2q 0 + I 2O \tE \cG "Cl a 2 k f) 2:13 / 2 � & a / 2 � I O*N # » ® w © w $ Qq d A 2O \tE \cG "Cl a 2 k f) \/ � I O*N # 00 bA O Q b U O O N o 'ti a� N �y ocn a� �w O O O N N O U a O U O O N c .2 O a b � � ¢ o S `� d M ,.,o 0 0 Q Q Q °O "y N o °o z z z CN A' 41 � N � o o 0 40� � o 0 � U c, �Ur p3 WAS y 00 d N N N EL� o O aA o 0 U U WAS N N U 0 �y N • a� ❑ o � N a a 0 on � � o ft7 }" N U � � L" •b U 0 00 Q 'b � a is a� W b O i. 0 y U a0i H O w .Z 00 bA O Q b U O O N o 'ti a� N �y ocn a� �w O O O N N O U a O U O O N c .2 O a b � � ¢ o S `� d M ,.,o 0 0 Q Q Q °O "y N o °o z z z CN A' 41 � N � o o 0 40� � o 0 � U c, a WAS EL� o aA o 0 U WAS i a� ❑ o 0 0 on ft7 }" N U � � L" •b U 0 00 Q 'b � a is a� W b O i. 0 y U a0i H O w .Z Cl) N `�" y 0 0 U .b O � O O ' w0 °3 .0 U U a.+ ' 0 o 0 o U c, i WAS o aA o 0 U WAS i a� ❑ o 0 0 on ft7 }" N U � � L" •b U 0 00 Q 'b � a is a� W b O i. 0 y U a0i H O w .Z i N N O O 'd y p 'U G N ¢ C1 N O Q 1 z �� z U W U' 0 Q � U z �b-0� z z z z N o Q O Q Q Q ON z � z z z z O 1 ryN as aoi e 1 ,o bA voi as o E .o Q � � z z i> OCd W b V] U V] z Ob z z z z to N bq Q 1 1 W 0 z �b-0� z z z z �w b i 1 � 0 3 as aoi e voi as o E .o z z z i> OCd W b V] U V] 1 to N bq WVN o o U o •U 1 � N i.a � � H '� � � W � � �+ i 'o y 0 y N ,� OU N�� .a > ov3 >w � U" O >¢c •° p p eq 3 aoi o p a a0i O C) 0 W > a o = > 5; c O O O N N Q o� a, w ' ca a� a� g5 w � Q bA :b O N �O ti w Q M c�7 ' z z M tn c-o 0 w N w , CL C o°'? zaZz°�`- a,a K ' Q O• U 40. U U ' (1) i � U •C 0 N O a `n y `d M tn c-o 0 w N w , CL C 0 co o N ��•' N Q o > O• U 40. U U ' (1) i � U •C p o i � y W Q. M tn U ' � F ' a � t gu� 1 �o 1 a w � o 1 a 1 1 � 1 ItT 0 C> o c -- N p O O O p p O O p p O O N ( O O N N O U Q �C* 'z Q o O O O p O U � 0 60 bA 4: to N O C O' O N a' O 'd may+ 0 •G 'G q� :.� > = bA D Gl� Q N O U fa G O O U b E w U U O O cd a> . Q. W d U b n 1, �� w « Ln Cd > o �oao �C� c t xo ° o c w a w F° v � S ca 0 a a `�3 O Wo 3�8 O O 2 y U •> U x O N O O O O O O O O O CIA 00 Q �'i O, i O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C t N N N N N M N M N N N .U, U " 44. C c 0 3 wo a •� .� 3 A o ' x ``" n 'ti c i,° ° CO " w ;�oC 00 to N o � _v O o•o ° oh o o o �io � o v a W v 'o E s ° •o �°v a N N .b w U � v o. to ° m O b C � -c >, o v O > ``C � a ao � � a Q iO , > � a 4) W C A 0 b , W w Q) A G or- � c� ', vUi 'b v b b ��• N C n .4 cri co 00 •O _ O U iL F'. 0 C O. O O. a> ° 0 3• cn c CA ., U a� �' o . i o. fn a o U �i a i C u W `' aAi w 'b W �' ; Q ° GL i w W) 0 0 0 0 °o ° ° o o CD °o °o 0 0 0 N C14 C14 v � It 1 4 z z Q a � � x i ' o ¢ a tn z z o ° 3 cc o aoi o ° co �' a U 4) 0 U O. ^O o c� > oA U to a� w o 9 U o b o .o b y y U ou eaa� o� c. U C U C. o b ti > sU- ' 00 i = : o to a�i ai ❑�❑ O U b b y y $ $ C O r o o o U U 3 a a> a W W n. 8 o U U •zi o (L) � � .o c 0 o O c N M M a+ N O O U � O O O aW Id v r , H O U � (W l gu h�l N+�1 O o W F* C O `n �uu Q 1� 0 o O c N M M a+ N O O y � O O O cd Id v O O a+ N y dd 46 cd Id v W U U dd 46 o W C O `n O Q v'i C C) U CG i ' �0 v7 QOq Z m U 609 +� " •9. v as d Cd 'b O 4. e ca; 3 o ►,n 4� C ;. - .2 a cs ; co Q c a� 0 S = pp O o w d o y ob o CG ^o 'd iv w v aoi o o E a E O� �aU wa oU o 3 °4° CIA r o o� on o. (D � "a moo, 40. K 4s `o, u o, y U b 4. v) o3 z w 0, j w 0 C�, s � 9 z U K L: C .�C Z ° o b abi v _ Q U 0 o ; as � A " C �V•! y •ir W4" 0 A - o E U Cd .0 Ir 0 M O O O M a z E.; a Q z 0 0 0 O O O �O O OO N w wa U 0.o 0 0.0A 0 E.S60.5 N O Y Y 3 o °o as O 14 b~A ' o 0 to o00 ' ftf U N 0 o on a� 3 ,cam •., a>i 4, 0 O 0, > C U a� O > O ca y r aoi o U o �° 00 .� on N. Qj N •a+ cC 'U U. o o U °n' vro, a. U E w 'O b 0 U a~i O o y U ,b U •U H it W � o w y o O > i a�i O to ?? Q�cn.a�x��aa U 00 W) °o a an (0 O 5 kn z w 0 CO 4 414 a�i y y U v ti b b� Y Y Q a�i C C', o`b N O Y Y 3 o °o as O 14 b~A ' o 0 to o00 ' ftf U N 0 o on a� 3 ,cam •., a>i 4, 0 O 0, > C U a� O > O ca y r aoi o U o �° 00 .� on N. Qj N •a+ cC 'U U. o o U °n' vro, a. U E w 'O b 0 U a~i O o y U ,b U •U H it W � o w y o O > i a�i O to ?? Q�cn.a�x��aa U 00 W) O 0, > C U a� O > O ca y r aoi o U o �° 00 .� on N. Qj N •a+ cC 'U U. o o U °n' vro, a. U E w 'O b 0 U a~i O o y U ,b U •U H it W � o w y o O > i a�i O to ?? Q�cn.a�x��aa U 00 W) 'O b 0 U a~i O o y U ,b U •U H it W � o w y o O > i a�i O to ?? Q�cn.a�x��aa U 00 W) 0 0 M 1 � O ' O O z �x a ' o 0 0 0 o U w N U v > U N y W O N CO O 1 41) 4 o '� U 'w o i> O. 0 1 O iU. N y 0.0 U O y Ncf y � •N o 0 M M O O O O � O � b � O U N a a `dAa�c� 'z ; a0i cd .0 U O 0 a i c. i4 J 0 a>i O U eno b � a0i cd .0 U O 0 a i c. J 0 a>i O U N c� N N C's .•. a � rYn G 3 b b 3 y U •° to "4 In o W D ci. CA v c 3 U y O cd O N '> O tko 'C b y E OD O boo a� O 0> D (It O c b O ,� a p o w e Y E N .-+ v N • � bA U .2 .2 E. U H O i O by i CL Old .ti b � a0i cd .0 U O 0 a i c. J 0 a>i O U N N N C's .•. 4-i cd O ••r G T� En G 3 b b 3 y U •° to "4 In W D ci. CA v a� FU„ • cC Q Ll W U rn C) C) 1 O O 0 O r. O N z � z A Q a a a ' o a va Cl) 60% v> > m ow c� r3� Q3v Qo3i i ¢ cz o o o o 0 Cd a� o 0 0 y o a� - oa� a�ob °cti�°" �Ubo a � on � a C cd ►, V) tw wo r. ' oa i k l ' G z i I O O aW O bA O O O O O r , bA . Y to ��• O p Cl) O lam. p O cn C O C p C l V1 ' gul l � O M O M FrT�, O O O M O O i k G z i I O O U O a> O_ O bA O O O O O p M bA . Y to ��• O p Cl) O lam. p O cn C C p C Q O i k C O O p C C p C 00 N M O M O O O M O O t: O h p C> p N O p O O fA 46S co cw o cc c co 0 bb to 0 U Q. * Q a ° to �3co a� CO .c w 2 o ° �. cd U a� o¢x Ln O p ; w 00 7EL Cl) 05 SUcnu0 w a v�v�v� c7 w or �"al �w aSxa as 0 to Q .' +r-i ❑ .. is U y ,S." 0 U �" U _y of ' ctS �"' C� a- b .fl sU. 'C ,5 M .a N b4 3� 3 W a) O E E Ci b N ; y Q. Eel y O v v � � C14 m fro ux o g ./0\ / # f ? / C) CA k { \ § ƒ / \ % 5 § a = a § \ 2 & - . \ ° 2 0 aV ± \f § [ G 0 \// �§0 / t � 0 � 2 0 k C14 m dr lF l' V w 1 C7 z O � ice° av of a� O O O O N O N N N O O N o �o 1 N N a � w � o Y 1 a It a CV O ivU ice° of Q O O O O N O N N N O O N o Q N N `^d O w° Y n r O O oo o O O� a "c o O a U o .a v) U 3 3 N O O O O U U U U ¢ O to a> a R V U U 3 a O' U H A O N U .r A Q W �, ° a a a to asa48„ a a U an on ao cn on to W W W W W W x N o x 00 o � r COS Qq a� a CV ivU ice° of O Q � C40) `^d O w° n r O oo o O oo° a "c o a U o .a v) U 3 3 CA U to a> a R V U U y O' U H A O N U .r A Q W �, ° U �» e o V U o 0 M