Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Council Agenda 110200V. CITY MANAGER REPORT a. Engineering Report • • • tA3A PUBLIC Nov Public Information Related Ac )N REPORT 000 ► Some of the written coverage included (over 40 articles from Oct. 1 to October 22, 2000): • Monthly PGA C.A.N. Article • C.A.N. article on Statistics and History City of Palm Beach Gardens • C.A.N. article on City Development and Recreation City of Palm Beach Gardens • Meeting to discuss Burns road widening (Jupiter Courier) • Truancy sweep nets six, Thursday (Jupiter Courier) • Budget hearing set for Monday (Jupiter Courier) • Gardens council ok's tax increase (Jupiter Courier) • Letter from Mayor Russo to the residents of Palm Beach Gardens (Weekday) • Jupiter Courier editorial Middle Ground on Martinez (Jupiter Courier) • Palm Beach Post Editorial on the Gardens • PBG: People aren't threatened by contaminants (Jupiter Courier) • Police tell neighbors of sexual offender (Jupiter Courier) • Gardens developers sue residents over possible building delay (Palm Beach Post) • State gives grades to Gardens and Dwyer high schools (Jupiter Courier) • Police hold sexual offender workshop (Jupiter Courier) • City, residents meet on Burns Road (Jupiter Courier) • Burns Road on the path from banal to beautiful(Neighborhood Post) • City to consider outdoor eating (Jupiter Courier) • Gardens to consider flyover assessment (Jupiter Courier) • City residents meet on Burns Road (Jupiter Courier) • Palm Beach Post editorial Gardens moving on • Ex -Lantana official gets interim (Palm Beach Post) • Gardens names interim city manager (Jupiter Courier) • Construction of PBG flyover could start next August (Jupiter Courier) • Findings said to back drainage challenge (Jupiter Courier) • 'Great Escape' drill in PBG, Wednesday (Jupiter Courier) • Railroad crossing work to close a portion of PGA Boulevard (Jupiter Courier) • School safety features will be upgraded to meet current codes (Jupiter Courier) • Gardens kicks off Fire Prevention Month 'world's largest fire drill'(Weekday) • Gardens council appoints Interim City Manager (Weekday) • "Toughest cop' shines at international tourney (Neighborhood Post) • P.B. County schools ranked second in fire code offenses (Palm Beach Post) • Cities' need for more money hikes some property tax bills (Palm Beach Post) • Jupiter Courier editorial A time of transition for local towns • Under inspection — Fire Department picture (Jupiter Courier) • Firefighters promoting safety measures in PBG (Jupiter Courier) • Municipal complex grand opening (Palm Beach Post) • PGA traffic crunch worsens • Two Grand Opening Ads — TGI Friday and Neighborhood Post • Flyover Presentation to Chamber (North Palm Beach Chamber Communicator) ■ Grand Opening of Gardens Municipal Complex (NPB Chamber Communicator) • Public Information Related Activities Continued ► Television Coverage • Channel 25 report on Municipal Complex Grand Opening October 22, 2000 • Channel 12 report on Municipal Complex Grand Opening October 22, 2000 • Channel 12 report on PGA CRALLS and City meeting ► Special Event Permits Processed: 5 • Ilex Circle Neighborhood Garage Sale September 30, 2000 • Palm Beach Community College Job Fair October 25, 2000 • Church in the Gardens Preschool Fall Festival October 28, 2000 • Palm Beach Gardens High School Homecoming Parade November 3, 2000 • District Marching Festival Dwyer High School November 4, 2000 ► Special Projects • Public Info /IS Division have completed City Website to be presented at the November 2, 2000 City Council meeting • Held Grand Opening of the Municipal Complex, approximate attendance 1200 • Published 19,200 City Line and sent to all residents and businesses in the City. • Communication Team meetings held — several ongoing projects. • City Gateway sign completed. • Notifications ► Sent 360 notices to Plat 4 residents regarding Public Hearing on City Center Linkage Plan ► Sent approximately 500 invitations and fliers to residents for the Grand Opening. Citizen Services Related Activities ■ Requests for service (from September 1 to September 23, 2000: 137. ■ Neighborhood Meetings Held: ♦ Cookout with residents of Holly Drive, etc (PGA Golf Club Estates neighborhood) on drainage project ■ Held Gardens Neighborhood Association meeting 0 • "Buy Into the Gardens" Program: ► Total Purchases for the month of October (up to October 22, 2000): $825 ► Total to date: $22,400.00 Volunteer Program (From October 1 to October 22, 2000) • Total hours: 238 • Current National Rate: $14.30 • Total savings to the City: $3,403.40 • Number of Volunteers currently referred to Departments for interviews: 1 Employee- Related Communications ► Published monthly employee newsletter, City Hall Gazette ► Provided presentation to new employees at Employee Orientation ► With the Communication Team, hosted an Employee Luncheon on Halloween to achieve the following goals: • meet the Interim City Manager • view the new City Website • learn about Employee suggestion boxes • celebrate Halloween ► Coordinating weekly Spanish lessons for Employees (Tuesdays, from 5:15 to 6:15 P.M.) Upcoming in November: • Findings from Customer Service Mystery Shopper Program to be presented to Council. • Training to Department contacts in Civic Tracker database, the system the City purchased for the tracking of all Citizen Requests for Service. • Neighborhood Program Meeting to be held to provide transportation information to residents. • Meeting with residents of Garden Woods to be held to provide information on the issue of train whistle noise and City Center Linkage plan. • News Highlights City of Palm Beach Gardens WELCOME Current Council Meeting Agenda: Click here to download as PDF file. (Acrobat Reader Required) Click here for other On -Line Documents Copyright© 2000- City of Palm Beach Gardens I Home I Legal Disclaimer & Privacy Statement s��nne:e 27. sppo • • ' hie D tl Qidnr . a + NICIP OMPLE. • �44 more info... Current Conditions Temperature: 73 °F Humidity: 73% Zip:33410 weatherguys.com V. CITY MANAGER REPORT d. Growth Management Report CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING October 5, 2000 The October 5, 2000, Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, was called to order at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex located at 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida; and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: The City Clerk called the roll and the following elected officials were found to be in attendance: Mayor Joseph R. Russo, Vice Mayor Eric Jablin, Councilmember David Clark, Councilmember Lauren Furtado, and Councilmember Carl Sabatello. REORDER AGENDA: Councilwoman Furtado made a motion to move Item for Council Action - Appointment of Interim City Manager - to immediately follow the City Manager Report. Councilman Clark seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 5 -0 vote. PRESENTATION: Cancer Survivor Park - Dale Bufaney, Vice President and Regional Director of the H &R Block Foundation, presented the Cancer Survivor Park concept, proposed to be located at the corner of Burns Road and Military Trail. Dedicated to cancer survivors, the park would be constructed at no cost to the City. The message of the park would be not to equate death with cancer. Elements of the park would include a series of sculptures by a renowned Mexican sculptor; a computer containing the names of local 5 -year cancer survivors, a positive mental attitude path with plaques displaying inspirational messages and suggestions to fight cancer, and a road to recovery with plaques explaining how to overcome cancer. Requirements were that the location must be an area of high visibility, that it be a park unto itself, and be less than 2 -1/2 acres. Upon approval by Mr. and Mrs. Block, $250,000 for construction and $100,000 for maintenance would be granted and the total value of the grant would be $1 million. The City would be required to designate the location to this use, design the park, and decide upon a theme. Staff was directed to proceed with this project. Modification to Community Center on Burns Road - A conceptual plan was presented by staff for the roadside footage that would be used in widening Burns Road. Trees were proposed to be moved back, access to the parking area would be reconfigured directly across from the fire station, and parking spaces would be relocated within the site. Councilman Clark suggested dispensing with the proposed long access road to the parking by the shuffleboard area. CITY MANAGER REPORT: Public Information Report - Beth Ingold Love announced that due to inclement weather last week the meeting with residents regarding the Holly Drive drainage project had been rescheduled to this coming Tuesday at 5:30. Approximately 1,000 residents had been notified of a public information meeting regarding Burns Road widening, and businesses located along RCA and Burns Road had been notified to suggest they provide alternative schedules to accommodate the FEC railroad crossing closure. Plans were proceeding to hold the grand opening for the municipal center on October 22. Mayor Russo noted there had been miscommunication regarding an event approved by the City Manager as a salute to veterans paid for by the Mark Foley campaign, and members of the CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, 10/5/2000 2 opposing political party who had complained had been offered use of the facilities to hold a similar event. Construction Update - Jack Hanson, Building Official, reported only five major items remained. Signage was scheduled for completion the week of October 13; landscape plans had received final approval and landscaping of the main facility was planned for completion by the grand opening; irrigation RFP was ready to begin the bidding process and concurrent completion of both the irrigation system and pumping station were anticipated; ADA hearing equipment would be ordered during the next week; and the four marble commemorative plaques from the old City Hall were to be installed the next day on the east wall of the main complex. Mr. Hanson reported that the postal kiosk was now fully operational. Mr. Hanson commented he would be staying with the City, and Vice Mayor Jablin thanked him for his work on this project. Growth Management Report - Principal Planner Steve Cramer announced that the Transportation Forum for the North County was scheduled for the weeks of November 13 or 27 at FAU, and the Council and other cities would be contacted regarding possible dates. Councilwoman Furtado requested a workshop on the canal report at the Special Meeting on October 11, with review of the report by the City Engineer. Mayor Russo noted that award of a contract for a Planning Consultant was on the Consent Agenda, selected from proposals submitted through an RFP. Discussion ensued regarding the fees paid to the consultant and whether they would be passed through to the developers who were offered this option to speed the approval process. Staff was requested to research and report on this item. ITEMS FOR COUNCIL ACTION: Appointment of Interim City Manager - Attorney Watterson reported that on September 25, 2000 a Resolution of removal with cause and suspension of City Manager Nabar Martinez had been passed by the City Council, and Attorney Len Rubin had been appointed Interim City Manager on that date. Attorney Watterson reported he had consulted with a number of people regarding their availability to serve as Interim City Manager until the removal and suspension process could be completed and a new City Manager could be chosen, and presented a proposed contract with Mr. Ronald M. Ferris, formerly City Manager of Lantana, for the position. Mr. Watterson reviewed the terms of the proposed contract. Councilmember Clark made a motion to approve the proposed employment agreement with Ronald M. Ferris. City Attorney Rubin noted that he had prepared Resolution 94, 2000 which contained the employment agreement, but it was not on the agenda. Motion was seconded by Vice Mayor Jablin. During discussion of the motion, Councilmember Furtado requested and received clarification from City Manager Rubin that the Resolution to suspend the City Manager had not been on the agenda but had been voted on at the meeting of September 25, 2000, and was put into written form and signed the next day. Councilman Clark clarified that the motion was simply to approve the proposed employment contract rather than to approve the Resolution, since the Resolution was not on the agenda. Motion carried by unanimous 5 -0 vote. Mayor Russo welcomed Mr. Ferris, who expressed his enthusiasm to begin work. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC: Roger Blangy - Mr. Blangy, representative of Garden Woods, explained that he and other representatives of Garden Woods had requested a public hearing for Plat 4 and suggested it be held at the October 19 meeting for the linkages plan. Following discussion, staff was directed to notify the Garden Woods residents who had attended a previous hearing and were told they would be advised of future hearings on this issue. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, 10/5/2000 3 There was a consensus of the City Council to request that those who had signed up to speak regarding the former City Manager not speak in order to begin a healing process, unless they had an item regarding future management of the City. No one came forward to speak. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilman Clark moved approval of items (a) (b) (c) and (e) on the Consent Agenda. Vice Chair Jablin seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 5 -0 vote. The following items were approved on the Consent Agenda: 1. Consideration of approving Minutes from the September 7, 2000 Regular City Council Meeting. 2. Consideration of approving Minutes from the September 14, 2000 Workshop City Council Meeting. 3. Consideration of awarding contract for Planning Consultant. 5. Consideration of refurbishing Rescue Unit. Discussion ensued on the following items that were not approved on the consent agenda: 4. Consideration of awarding bid for Grant Writing Services - Councilmember Clark questioned regarding item (d) Consideration of awarding bid for Grant Writing Services why the high bidder had been chosen instead of the low bidder. Tom DeRita, Resource Group, reviewed the rating system criteria, and explained that Langton Associates had been picked based on their years of experience and their track record. Discussion ensued regarding lack of backup information in the packets, and Councilman Clark requested the backup information be provided on this item and that more backup information be provided in the future. Councilman Sabatello made a motion to approve award the bid for Grant Writing Services to Langton Associates. Councilwoman Furtado seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 5 -0 vote. 6. Resolution 87, 2000 - Consideration of approving the Engineering Agreement - Councilwoman Furtado requested clarification on part-time and in -house engineering. Discussion ensued regarding closely monitoring costs. Councilmember Clark made a motion to approve Resolution 87, 2000. Vice Mayor Jablin seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 5 -0 vote. 7. Resolution 89, 2000 - Authorization to Execute Joinder to Drainage Easement - Councilwoman Furtado explained that since there was a question of whether platting for Gardens Mall had ever been approved and recorded, she was not comfortable approving anything regarding the mall and surrounding areas. Consensus was to delay consideration of Resolution 89, 2000 until that question was answered and the as -built for Gardens Mall. was provided. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Ordinance 21, 2000 - Hibiscus Restaurant Outdoor Seating. Mayor Russo declared the public hearing open, held on the intent of Ordinance 21, 2000 - an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, providing for an Amendment to the Existing Planned Unit Development known as "Hibiscus Restaurant" (Formerly Bridge Center PUD) Located at the Northwest corner of PGA Boulevard and Ellison Wilson Road, as originally approved by Ordinance 11, 1995, to allow outdoor seating and service adjacent to the Waterway; providing for conditions of approval; providing for severability; providing for conflicts; and providing for an effective date. Petitioner's representative Attorney Lawrence Smith requested approval conditioned upon granting the City Council total discretion to revoke the approval if there were complaints from neighbors, if CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, 10/5/2000 4 they deemed it appropriate after hearing the restaurant owner's case. Petitioner proposed a public meeting to review the situation in any case in May 2001. Petitioner described proposed screening of adjacent property. Jim Brindell spoke on behalf of the owner. Richard Arnold, neighbor adjacent to the property, expressed opposition and expressed concerns regarding noise, lack of privacy, and decreased real estate'values. Neighbors Thomas Fink, Norman Chabre, and Don Colvin, also spoke in opposition. Hearing no further comments from the public, Mayor Russo declared the Public Hearing closed. Following discussion, the following amendment was read into the record by the Acting Interim City Manager Len Rubin: The grant of outdoor seating shall be automatically revoked should the Lessee /Operator at time of approval, which is The Breakers, cease to operate a restaurant on this site. Councilman Clark made a motion to approve the amendment to Ordinance 21, 2000 as read into the record by the Acting Interim City Manager.Rubin. Vice Mayor Jablin seconded the motion, which carried by 4 -1 vote, with Mayor Russo opposing the motion. Councilmember Clark moved that Ordinance 21, 2000 be placed on second reading and approved as amended. Vice Mayor Jablin seconded the motion. Motion carried by 4 -1 vote, with Mayor Russo opposing the motion. The City Clerk read Ordinance 21, 2000 on Second Reading by title only. Ordinance 27, 2000 - Capital Project Assessment. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, Relating to Capital Improvements Providing a Special Benefit to Local Areas within the City, Providing Definitions and Findings; Providing for Title and Citation; Providing for the Creation of Assessment Areas; Authorizing the Imposition and Collection of Special Assessments to Fund the Cost of Capital Improvements Providing a Special Benefit to Local Areas within the City; Establishing Procedures for Notice and Adoption of Assessment Rolls and for Correction of Errors and Omissions; Providing that Assessments Constitute a Lien on Assessed Property upon Adoption of the Assessment Rolls; Establishing Procedures and Methods for Collection of Assessments; Authorizing the Issuance of Obligations Secured by assessments; Providing for Various Rights and Remedies of the Holders of Such Obligations; Providing that such Obligations will not Create a General Debt or Obligation of the City; Providing for Codification; Providing for Severability; Providing for Conflicts; and Providing an Effective Date. Staff presented the Ordinance. Hearing no comments from the public, Mayor Russo declared the Public Hearing closed. Councilman Clark moved to place on Second Reading by title only and to approve Ordinance 27, 2000. Vice Mayor Jablin seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 5 -0 vote. The City Clerk read Ordinance 27, 2000 by title only on Second Reading. RESOLUTIONS: Resolution 76, 2000 - Principal Planner Steve Cramer presented Resolution 76, 2000 - A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, Providing for the Approval of a Major Site Plan Amendment for Construction of 115 parking spaces and two covered parking areas on a portion of Lot 10 of South Park Center A/K/A 4600 East Park Drive within the Northcorp Planned Community District; providing for waivers; providing for conditions of approval; providing for conflicts; and providing for an effective date. Hank Skokowski, agent for the petitioner, spoke on behalf of the petitioner. Councilman Clark made a motion to approve Resolution 76, 2000. Vice Mayor Jablin seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 5 -0 vote. Resolution 86, 2000 - Initial Assessment Resolution for PGA Flyover. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, relating to the Construction of Certain Local Improvements within the Proposed PGA Flyover Assessment Area; Determining the Estimated CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, 10/5/2000 5 Capital Cost of the PGA Flyover Enhancements; Establishing the Terms and Conditions of the Proposed Special Assessments, Establishing a Public Hearing to consider imposition of the Proposed Assessments and the method of their collection; Directing the provision of Notice; and Providing an effective date. Acting Interim City Manager Len Rubin. advised that staff had requested this item be pulled from the agenda. Mayor Russo requested that Councilmember Sabatello follow up on this item and that it be brought before the City Council. ORDINANCES: Ordinance 28, 2000 - Planner John Lindgren presented the project information for The Isles - Parcel 4.05, Ordinance 28, 2000 - An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, Providing for the Approval of an Application from DiVosta and Company for a Planned Unit Development by Approving the Construction of 379 Residential Units, a 5,300 square -foot Town Center, a 1,600 square -foot Swimming Pool, 4 Tennis Courts, and a 400 square -foot Maintenance Building Located at the Southeast Corner of Military Trail and Hood Road, as more particularly described herein; Providing for Conditions of Approval; Providing for Waivers; Providing for Severability; Providing for Conflicts; and Providing for an Effective Date. Rick Greene, Vice President, DiVosta Company, presented a power point presentation. Ensuing discussion included, among other items, drainage issues and littoral plantings. Conditions of approval and waivers were discussed with the applicant, and changes were noted by staff to be included on Second Reading. Councilman Clark made a motion to place Ordinance 28, 2000 on First Reading by title only. Vice Mayor Jablin seconded the motion, which carried by unanimous 4 -0 vote. The City Clerk read Ordinance 28, 2000 on First Reading by title only. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: WCI Parcel 4.03 / 4.06 - Nancy Graham presented the project known as Evergrene on behalf of the petitioner and reviewed the master plan. Hank Skokowski noted that the three issues of this presentation were flexibility of design standards, a Comprehensive Plan amendment issue, and controlled access. Innovative housing styles and their relationships to the surrounding open space, roadways, alleyways, etc. were described. Mr. Skokowski requested support for on- street parking, alleyways, reduced setbacks, increased lot coverages, and unconventional housing styles. Mr. Skokowski noted that the Comprehensive Plan included a thoroughfare that was in conflict with the project design and requested an indication of whether the City would support an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Consideration of a plan to control access to the community was requested to avoid potential problems of Dwyer high school students coming from across the street to the lake area. Staff explained that this thoroughfare would not affect the CRALLS issue. Petitioner was requested to revisit design of the parks, and to address bus stops and guest parking setbacks. A different spelling of the name Evergrene was suggested. petitioner commented they would be happy to pay for review by an outside consultant. The petitioner was complimented on the design and other areas using this type of design were discussed. ITEMS & REPORTS BY MAYOR AND COUNCIL - Vice Mayor Jablin requested support for a petition the Northlake Neighborhood Coalition was preparing to present to the Governor opposing the turnpike interchange on Northlake Boulevard. Mayor Russo requested this item be delayed until Councilwoman Furtado was present, and stated she had left because she was sick. Joan Elias, representing the Coalition, requested support from the City Council. Consensus was to have the City Attorney draw up a Resolution in support of the petition. Tom DeRita, Resource Group, advised he would be happy to work on this issue. Mr. DeRita's charges and scope of contract were CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, 10/5/2000 discussed. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, 10/5/2000 7 Ms. Elias thanked the City for the volunteer recognition party. Councilmember Sabatello requested a list of issues be presented to the City Manager to be prioritized. Councilmember Sabatello suggested the City support a teen center at the cinema location at Loehman's Plaza, and the Recreation Director reported she was looking into this situation. Mayor Russo reported he had met with Dr. Marlin, who had indicated that the Jupiter elementary school would be opened next year, the middle school opened the following year, and that many schools within the City were getting partial renovations; and had explained that capacity was figured without considering the portables. Dr. Marlin had said the level of service within the City could not be increased, but expressed concern about classroom size. Mr. Marlin had apologized for the alternative school situation and lack of communication, but felt that school was good for this program. Mayor Russo reported Leo Noble would be back before the City Council in November. Mayor Russo requested a list of equipment for maintenance of the ballfields. Mayor Russo indicated decisions were needed regarding how to recruit a permanent City Manager, and someone to help the City Council with management of the City. Consensus was to hold on the study of the City that had been previously authorized until after the new City Manager and Mr. Watterson had a chance to consult on this issue. Councilmember Sabatello referred to a graphic of the flyover and suggested looking at proposed traffic signal locations that did not improve traffic flow. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, upon motion by Councilman Clark, seconded by Vice Mayor Jablin, carried 4 -0, the meeting was adjourned at 11:30 p.m. APPROVAL: MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO VICE MAYOR ERIC JABLIN CHAIRMAN PRO TEM CARL SABATELLO COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK COUNCILWOMAN LAUREN FURTADO ATTEST: CAROL GOLD CITY CLERK CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, 10/5/2000 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 23, 2000 SUBJECT /AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of approval of Resolution 84, 2000, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Agreement with Seacoast Utility Authority for Joint Participation and Project Funding for the Construction of Burns Road Improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution 84, 2000 Reviewed by: City Attorney Originating Dept: City Attorney Costs: Not Applicable Council Action: [ ] Approved [ ] Approved with conditions Funding Source: [ ] Denied [ ] Continued to: Advertised: Submitted by: City Attorne 6Z, Date: Paper: Not applicable [ X] Not Required Attachments: Approved by: Affected parties: Resolution 84, 2000 City Manager Joint Participation [ ] Notified Agreement [ X] Not Required Explanation: Seacoast desires to construction certain water and sewer improvements in conjunction with the City's widening of Burns Road. This Agreement provides a mechanism whereby the Seacoast improvements are constructed at the same time as the City's improvements, with each party bearing its own costs and expenses. RESOLUTION 84, 2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYORAND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH SEACOAST UTILITY AUTHORITY FORJOINT PARTICIPATION AND PROJECT FUNDING IN CONNECTION WITH THE WIDENING OF BURNS ROAD; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City will be commencing construction activities related to the widening of Burns Road; and WHEREAS, Seacoast Utility Authority desires to make improvements to its water distribution and sewage transmission facilities located within the Burns Road right -of -way; and WHEREAS, in order to make the best of use of public resources, the City and Seacoast wish to enter into a Joint Participation Agreement whereby Seacoast's improvements will constructed as part of the widening of Burns Road and Seacoast will reimburse the City for all costs attributed to the construction of such improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Joint Participation and Project Funding Agreementwith Seacoast Utility Authority relating to the construction of improvements within the Burns Road right -of -way. A copy of this agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. RESOLVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF ATTESTED BY: CITY CLERK -1- 2000. MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: CITY ATTORNEY VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR JABLIN COUNCILMAN SABATELLO COUNCILWOMAN FURTADO COUNCILMAN CLARK -2- AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS AND SEACOAST UTILITY AUTHORITY FOR JOINT PARTICIPATION AND PROJECT FUNDING IN CONSTRUCTION OF BURNS ROAD WIDENING PROJECT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 2000, by and between the CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, a Florida Municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY" and SEACOAST UTILITY AUTHORITY, a separate Florida legal entity, hereinafter referred to as the "AUTHORITY". and W ITNESSETH: WHEREAS, CITY intends to construct improvements to Burns Road, hereinafter "Project'; WHEREAS, AUTHORITY desires to construct water distribution and or sewage transmission systems, utility adjustments and other utility system improvements, hereinafter "Improvements"; and WHEREAS, CITY and AUTHORITY desire to jointly participate in the construction of the Improvements and the Project in order to make the best use of the CITY and AUTHORITY resources; and WHEREAS, Section 163.01, Florida Statutes, allows governmental units to make the most efficient use of their powers by enabling them to cooperate with other localities on the basis of mutual advantage and thereby provide services and facilities that will harmonize geographic, 1 economic, population and other factors influencing the needs and development of local communities; and WHEREAS, both CITY and AUTHORITY declare that it is in the public interest that the Improvements be constructed with the Project; and NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the Parties agree as follows: 1. The purpose of this Agreement is to clarify the parties' roles and obligations regarding procurement, construction and funding of AUTHORITY's Improvements to be constructed in conjunction with the Project. 2. AUTHORITY agrees to fund and pay directly to CITY costs attributable to construction of the Improvements along the right -of -way of the Project as outlined and shown in the Bid Documents for City of Palm Beach Gardens Project # 3. Said cost for the Improvements is ($ ), in accordance with the attached bid tabulation (Attachment "A ") and summary of the Improvements (Attachment "B "). 4. Costs shall be adjusted to actual contract costs for the Improvements using contract unit prices and actual construction quantities. Said quantities shall be measured by CITY's Engineering and Public Works Department in conjunction with AUTHORITY's Engineer and reviewed by AUTHORITY at the time of the contractor's monthly pay application. AUTHORITY shall return to the CITY said monthly pay application(s) within five (5) working days of receipt of same from the CITY. 2 5. AUTHORITY agrees to remit periodicpayment(s) for the Improvements as set forth in Paragraphs 2 through 4 above within thirty (30) days of receiving written notice from the CITY that payment is required. 6. CITY is to be responsible for administering the funds in accordance with this Agreement. 7. AUTHORITY is to be responsible for, and agrees to provide or cause to be performed all inspection services related to the Improvements during construction of the Improvements, including certification of the Improvements. 8. CITY shall obtain AUTHORITY's written approval which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld for any change orders which change the cost attributable to the construction of Improvements. AUTHORITY shall notify CITY of its intent to approve or deny the change order within five (5) working days of CITY's notice to the AUTHORITY of the necessity for a change order relating to the Improvements. AUTHORITY shall be responsible for any costs caused by AUTHORITY's delays, including but not limited to Project delays. CITY shall be responsible for any costs caused by CITY's delays, including but not limited to Project delays. 9. In the event that the parties determine that additional Improvements and additional funding are required, for the satisfactory completion of the Improvements, the additional cost attributable to the construction of the Improvements, as outlined in the specifications for this project, is the responsibility of AUTHORITY. In the event of an "under run" attributable to said construction of the Improvements, AUTHORITY will be credited or refunded the excess amount. 10. The parties to this agreement shall not be deemed to assume any liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of the other party. Nothing contained herein shall be 3 construed as a waiver by either party of the liability limits established in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes. 11. In the event a claim or lawsuit is brought against CITY its officers, employees, servants, or agents, AUTHORITY agrees, without waiver of limitation as provided for in Section 768.28, Florida Statues, and to the extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless CITY, its officers, employees, servants or agents from and against any claims, losses, demands, damages, liabilities or causes of action of whatsoever kind or nature that CITY, its officers, employees, servants or agents may or could sustain as a result of or emanating out of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement arising out of any act, omission or fault whether active or passive of AUTHORITY or anyone acting under its direction or control, or on its behalf in conjunction with or incidental to the performance of this Agreement. 12. In the event a claim or lawsuit is brought against AUTHORITY, its officers, employees, servants, or agents, CITY agrees, without waiver of limitation as provided for in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, and to the extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless the AUTHORITY, its officers, employees, servants or agents from and against any claims, losses, demands, damages, liabilities or causes of action of whatsoever kind or nature that the AUTHORITY, its officers, employees, servants or agents may or could sustain as a result of or emanating out of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement whether arising out of any act, omission or fault whether active or passive of the CITY or anyone acting under its direction or control, or on its behalf in conjunction with or incidental to the performance of this Agreement. 13. All provisions of this Agreement calling for the expenditure of money by either CITY or AUTHORITY are subject to annual budgetary funding and should either Party fail to fund any of their respective obligations pursuant to this Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated. However, once the construction of Improvements commences this Agreement shall be binding upon 4 the parties and shall no longer be contingent upon the availability of funds for the proposed Improvements. AUTHORITY shall not have the right to terminate this Agreement for the reason that sufficient funds are not available for the Improvements. Further, once the CITY commences construction of Improvements, the Improvements shall be prosecuted to completion, unless the AUTHORITY notifies CITY in writing that further work on the Improvements shall cease. In that event AUTHORITY shall be responsible for all costs incurred relating to the Improvements. 14. Any and all notices required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be deemed received when hand delivered or three (3) days after same are deposited in U.S. Mail sent via certified mail, return receipt requested. All notice to the AUTHORITY shall be sent to: Seacoast Utility Authority 4200 Hood Road Pahn Beach Gardens, 17133410 Attn: Richard Bishop, Executive Director All notice to the CITY shall be sent to: City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 North Military Trail Pahn Beach Gardens, 17133410 Attn: . City Manager and copy to: Watterson, Hyland and Klett, P.A. 4100 RCA Boulevard Pahn Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Attn: Leonard G. Rubin, City Attorney 15. Any costs or expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, associated with the enforcement of the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be borne by the respective party who incurred same provided, however, that this clause pertains only to the parties to this Agreement. 16. Except as expressly permitted herein to the contrary, no modification, amendment E or alteration in the terms or conditions contained herein shall be effective unless contained in a written document executed with the same formality and equality of dignity herewith. 17. This Agreement shall be construed and governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Any and all legal action necessary to enforce this Agreement shall be held in Palm Beach County. No remedy herein conferred upon any party is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy and each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given hereunder or now or hereinafter existing at law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. No single or partial exercise by any party of any right, power or remedy hereunder shall preclude any other or further exercise thereof. 18. The preparation of this Agreement is considered a joint effort of the parties and the resulting document shall not as a matter of judicial constraint be construed more severely against one of the parties than the other. 19. CITY and AUTHORITY agree that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, sex, national origin, disability, religion, ancestry, martial status or sexual orientation, be excluded from the benefits of or be subjected to any form of discrimination under any activity carried out by the performance of this Agreement. 20. In the event that any section, paragraph, sentence, clause or provision hereof is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this Agreement and the same shall remain in full force and effect. 21. This Agreement represents the entire understanding between the parties and supersedes all other negotiations, representations or agreements, either written or oral, relating to this Agreement. 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this agreement on the day and year first above written. SEACOAST UTILITY AUTHORITY, by its Governing Board Ii Gail F. Nelson, Chair ATTEST: Mary Ann Stiles, Authority Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY Phillip C. Gildan, Authority Attorney I \PBGSUBOR \CrrY- SUA.wp:081600 7 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, by its City Council By: Joseph R. Russo, Mayor ATTEST: Carol Gold, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY By: Leonard G. Rubin, City Attorney CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 11, 2000 SUBJECT /AGENDA ITEM Consideration of Approval: Resolution 99, 2000, a request to amend the signage plan for the PGA National Planned Community District (PCD), in order to allow for a new street sign program along major spine roads throughout the PCD. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Resolution 99, 2000, which contains conditions of approval. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ Council Action: Total City Attorn Growth Management [ ] Approved Finance N t--r $ Current FY [ ] Approved w/ ACM conditions Human Res. NA [ ] Denied Other NA Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Advertised: Attachments: Date: [ ] Operating Paper: [ ] Other • Resolution 99, 2000 • Street Sign Elevations • Community Awareness Network [X] Not Required Letter Submitted by: I!T Growth M nai nJJt Affected parties Budget Acct. #:: Director ��a" -AAA [ ] Notified [ ] None Approved by: City Manager [X] Not required Page 1 of 5 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 11, 2000 Petition MISC -00 -15 I. REQUEST Dawn Levinstein, agent for PGA Property Owners Association, Inc., is requesting an amendment to the PGA National Planned Community District (PCD). The proposed amendment would allow for a new street sign program along major spine roads throughout the PCD. The PGA National PCD is bounded by PGA Boulevard, Florida Turnpike, Northlake Boulevard and the C -18 canal, and is located within Sections 9,10,15,16- 42E -52S. II. BACKGROUND A. History The PGA National Planned Community Development (PCD) was approved for an overall signage program by Resolution 73, 1990 and amended by Resolution, 26 1996. The approved signage program provided for a street sign program utilizing the existing metal blade with black background and white lettering design. The petitioner also received administrative approval for a new street sign design in 1999, to replace the existing design with a new design for the Glengary subdivision only. The petitioner is proposing to utilize the Glengary street sign design for the overall PCD spine road design theme. B. Land Use and Zoning The PGA National community has a future land use designation of RL - Residential Low and zoning of Planned Community Development. C. Concurrency Not applicable. D. Development Review Committee The Development Review Committee (DRC) members, representing public and private agencies affected by the proposed development were notified of the proposed amendment to the PGA National PCD. No adverse comments were received from the DRC members. Page 2 of 5 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 11, 2000 Petition MISC -00 -15 E. Procedure This is a request to amend the Planned Community Development. The request is reviewed by City Staff and the Development Review Committee, who forward comments and recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Acting in an advisory role, the Commission considers the recommendations of the DRC and City Staff and makes a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council reviews the request for an amendment to a PCD, and makes a final determination of approval, approval with conditions, or denial. III. PROJECT DETAILS A. Site Location and Existing Conditions The PGA National PCD contains four (4) major spine roads, Avenue of the Champions, Tournament Boulevard, Ryder Cup Boulevard, and Avenue of the Masters. The intersection between these roadways and local streets throughout the PCD currently utilize the metal blade with black background and white lettering design. The petitioner would like to replace this with the new sign design at these intersection locations. IV. COMMENTS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC) Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District owns and maintains the spine roads throughout the PGA National PCD. Northern has issued a permit dated August 28, 2000 for the replacement of street signs within their right -of -ways. This permit is on file with the Growth Management Department. Fire Department No comments City Engineer The City Engineer has requested more detailed site location specifications for the street signs. The petitioner has responded that they would do so. The petitioner has responded with the information requested, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. In addition to the standard Development Review Committee comments, the petitioner has also submitted a letter of approval from C.A.N!, the PGA National Community Awareness Network. City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 11, 2000 Petition MISC -00 -15 PGA NATIONAL PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT X — INTERSECTIONS PROPOSED FOR NEW SIGNAGE V. OUTSTANDING ISSUES There are no outstanding issues. 4 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 11, 2000 Petition MISC -00 -15 VI. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this project at its October 11, 2000 meeting. The Commission voted 4 -0 to recommend approval to the City Council with the condition that all outstanding Engineering concerns be addressed prior to scheduling for City Council consideration. VII. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Resolution 99, 2000 with no conditions. \ \FILE_SRV\COMPROG \Short Range \misc0015cc.doc h� U October 11, 2000 RESOLUTION 99, 2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE MASTER SIGNAGE PLAN FOR THE PGA NATIONAL RESORT COMMUNITY PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT (PCD), AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Palm Beach Gardens received an application from PGA National Property Owners Association for approval of an amendment to a previously- approved master signage plan in order to replace street signs along major "spine" roads within the PGA National PCD; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application and determined that it is sufficient; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application and determined that it is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has recommended approval of the amendment of the master signage plan for the PCD known as PGA National Resort; and WHEREAS, the City's Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed said application and recommended that it be approved. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida hereby approves an amendment to the master signage plan for the PGA National PCD, as approved by Resolution 73, 1990 and amended by Resolution 26, 1996, to permit the replacement of street signs along major "spine" roads within the PCD. SECTION 2. Construction of the above mentioned street sign program shall be in compliance with the following plans on file with the City's Growth Management Department: Resolution 99, 2000 Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 11, 2000 Petition MISC -00 -15 Official Exhibits: 1. G.M. Date Stamped September 1, 2000, Outline Specification for Fabrication of Road Name Signs, Signing America, Corp., Contractor, 2 Sheets 2. G.M. Date Stamped September 1, 2000, Double Blade Elevation View, Signing America, Corp., 3 Sheets 3. September 9, 1999 Memorandum, Sign Replacement Locations, 2 Sheets 4. G.M. Date Stamped September 1, 2000 PGA Street Sign Location Map, 1 Sheet SECTION 3. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 2000. MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO ATTEST BY: CAROL GOLD CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY BY: CITY ATTORNEY VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR JABLIN COUNCILWOMAN FURTADO COUNCILMAN CLARK 2 Resolution 99, 2000 Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 11, 2000 Petition MISC -00 -15 COUNCILMAN SABATELLO EXHIBIT "A" PGA National Planned Community District 3 e City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 23, 2000 Petition VAR -99 -07 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 23, 2000 SUBJECT /AGENDA ITEM Resolution 47, 2000, approving variances from front setback and street frontage requirements for an existing ground sign at 2700 PGA Boulevard. The variance request seeks relief from the 300 -foot street frontage requirement and from the 15 -foot front setback requirement. The City Council continued the public hearing for this petition to October 19, 2000. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Resolution 47, 2000. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ Council Action: City Attorney 41�?7 Growth Management Total [ ] Approved Finance NA $ [ ] Approved w/ ACM Current FY conditions Human Res. NA [ ] Denied Other NA Advertised: Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Attachments: Date: June 1, 2000 [ ] Operating Paper: Palm Beach Post [ ]Other • Resolution 47, 2000 [] Not Required • Renderings ted by: wth Management Affected parties Budget Acct. #:: Director [X] Notified [ ] None Approved by: City Manager [] Not required 1 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 23, 2000 Petition VAR -99 -07 SUMMARY OF PREVOUS CITY COUNCIL ACTION: The applicant requested the City Council to continue the public hearing to November 2, 2000. The purpose was so that the petitioner could adequately address the concerns raised by the Council during the public hearing held on September 21, 2000. The applicant has modified the sign considerably to resemble Gardens Mall ground sign. It is acceptable in appearance than the existing sign on site or the previously proposed sign modification reviewed by the Council on September 21, 2000. The applicant has provided elevations and three - dimensional drawings of the proposed modifications to the sign, including the material and color scheme. Please see attachments. REQUEST: The petitioner, Quentin Partners Co., requests a variance to allow an existing ground sign to remain on site and at its current location. The site is located at 2700 PGA Boulevard (Blvd.), just east of Palm Beach Community College. The subject sign does not meet the minimum 15 -foot front setback and 300 -foot street frontage requirements. The sign has been made non - conforming by the revised sign code, which was adopted on January 17, 1990. The applicant was notified of the non- conforming status of the subject ground sign, as part of the non - conforming sign notification procedures. BACKGROUND: The petitioner received a site plan approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission on January 21, 1983. The approved site plan depicts a ground sign located on PGA Blvd. approximately 34 feet away from the property line to the west. The front setback, as reflected on the approved site plan, was approximately 4.5 feet away from the front property line. The shape of the approved sign was in a shape of an isosceles triangle, but with two sides only. The subject sign is located approximately 65 feet away from the west property line to the west. The front setback is approximately two feet away from the front property line, compared to its original front setback, which was approximately 4.5 feet. The current shape of the sign remains as originally approved, which is a concrete wall in the shape of a triangle with two sides facing the street and the open side facing the building. (Please see attachment.) According to the applicant, the subject sign also serves as a shield wall for a utility box (backflow preventer) located immediately behind the sign. The primary function of the structure is to shield/screen the backflow preventer. Section 98- 72(g)(1) of the City Code requires that a wall of solid materials on three sides with the open side facing the building structure be used to screen the backflow preventer. The applicant has since placed the number of the building on this structure. According to the definition of a sign in the City Code, this action makes the structure a sign because it identifies information. The general description of this sign is a concrete wall structure with a height of 4.2 and a length of 13.6 feet with one message on it identifying the number of the building. 2 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 23, 2000 Petition VAR -99 -07 The applicant has claimed a hardship on the basis that removing the sign would create "an undue hardship on the general public, cause a traffic problem, and deprive Quentin Partners Co. and its tenants of rights commonly enjoyed by others..." LAND USE & ZONING: The future land -use designation of the site is Commercial. The zoning for the site is General Commercial (CGl). Properties adjacent to the subject site are designated Commercial (C) to the east and west, Mobile Home to the north, and Residential High (RH) to the south. PROCEDURE: The City's existing land development regulations designate the authority of reviewing and granting sign variances directly to the City Council. As with other variances, a petitioner must demonstrate hardship. Section 110 -72, Variances, states that "The hardship shall not be economics or natural obstructions on adjacent land, but shall be a hardship whereby an applicant cannot reasonably enjoy and utilize the intended benefits provided in this chapter." VAR-99-07,2700 PGA SIGN VARIANCE REQUEST GROUND SIGN CODE REQUIREMENTS WITH WHICH THE SUBJECT SIGN IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE A. Ground Sign Frontage Requirement: Code Requirements: Chapter 110 -36. Ground signs. (a) "Any property with at least 300 feet of a property line abutting a public right -of -way shall be allowed a ground sign..." Present Condition: A ground sign was approved for the subject site on January 21, 1983. However, the property does not have 300 feet of frontage. The parcel has only 100 feet of frontage. Request: Applicant requests a variance for 200 feet of frontage to allow the existing ground sign along located along PGA Blvd. to remain on site. B. Setback Requirement: Code Requirements: Chapter 110 -36. Ground signs. (c) "Ground signs shall be placed no closer than 15 feet from the front property lines..." Present Condition: The subject sign is approximately two feet away from the front property line. Request: Applicant requests a variance for 13 feet of setback. STAFF COMMENTS: The City Engineer's office does not support the requested variance and has suggested that the petitioner can reconfigure the sign to comply with the 15 -foot setback requirement and still achieve the same existing visibility. The Building Division has raised no objections and supports the requested variance by the applicant. Public Works Department has raised no comments. Staff comments are attached. Staff has received no public comments regarding this petition at this time. RECOMMENDATION: Following City Council direction, staff has worked with the applicant to provide an acceptable replacement or modification to the existing sign based on two important criteria. The sign must be comparable to other and recently approved monument signs located along the City's most important arterial, PGA Blvd., in addition to complying with all sign regulations specified in the Code. The newly proposed modifications to the sign appear to resemble the Gardens Mall ground sign and are in 3 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 23, 2000 Petition VAR -99 -07 compliance with the sign regulations in the Code for which the applicant is not requesting variances. Accordingly, staff recommends approval of the requested variances. The recommendation is based on the following: • Relocating the sign further back, and east of its current location may be difficult because parking spaces are located immediately behind it and across the entire site in the east -west direction. In addition, compliance with the 15 -foot setback may make the sign less visible to motorists headed east on PGA Blvd. due to the vegetation on the property to the west of the subject site. Removing the sign entirely would make it fairly difficult for motorists to identify the buildings on site because the closest building to the public right -of -way is set back approximately 147 feet from the north property line on PGA Blvd. This distance from PGA Blvd. makes the alternative of allowing only a building identification sign (wall sign) and removing the ground sign less viable because motorists would not be able to see the wall sign until they approach the site's driveway. From a safety standpoint, the existing location of the sign is properly the most suitable. Motorists headed east on PGA Blvd. are able to see the sign and identify the building from a reasonable distance without having to make sudden stops or right turns into the driveway of the site. The applicant has agreed to replace the sign with an acceptable one, in accordance with the Council's request. It should be noted, however, the applicant has not satisfied the hardship requirement and the facts, as presented in this petition, appear to be in contradiction with the facts as recorded in City approved plans regarding the subject site and sign. The following is a summary of the facts and an analysis as to why the hardship test has not been satisfied: The applicant has not satisfied the hardship test. The applicant has stated that removing or relocating the sign would result in a hardship on the general public, cause traffic problems, and deprive Quentin Partners Co. and its tenants of rights commonly enjoyed by others. According to the applicant, the general public (motorists headed east on PGA Blvd.) will not be able or may have difficulty seeing a ground sign set back at least 15 feet way from the property's front line due to the vegetation on the Palm Beach Community College property. The likelihood that the public will not be able to see the sign because of the vegetation places a hardship on the general public, according to the applicant. However, this is not a hardship as defined in the Code. The vegetation represents a natural obstruction to the subject sign. Section 110 -72 of the Code states that "the hardship shall not be ... natural obstructions on adjacent lands ..." • The claim that the existing sign is actually a structure required by Code to screen the backflow preventer is not accurate because the Code does not require the existing "wall" as a screen for the backflow preventer in this particular case. Section 98- 72(g)(1) requires the wall structure only if the backflow preventer is large. In this case it is 1.5 by 1.7 feet, whereas the "wall" or sign is 4.2 4 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 23, 2000 Petition VAR -99 -07 feet in height and 13.6 feet in length. Due to the small size of the backflow preventer, Section 98- 72(g)(2) permits screen landscaping as opposed to a wall structure. • The wall structure was approved as a sign and not as a screen wall. The approved site plan depicts the same structure as a ground sign at a different location than the current one. G:Talal/var -99 -07 61 Prepared on: October 23, 2000 Public hearing on: November 2, 2000 RESOLUTION 47, 2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, GRANTING TWO VARIANCES TO THE 15 -FOOT FRONT SETBACK AND 300 - FOOT STREET FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR AN EXISTING GROUND SIGN LOCATED AT 2700 PGA BOULEVARD; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF RESOLUTIONS IN CONFLICT; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Quentin Partners, owner and applicant, have filed a petition for two sign variances from the minimum 300 -foot linear frontage on a public right -of -way and the 15- foot front setback requirements, as set forth in Section 110 -36 of the City Code; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 110 -72 of the City Code, the City Council finds that the petitioner has sufficiently demonstrated an undue hardship whereby the petitioner can not reasonably enjoy and utilize the benefits provided in the City sign regulations; and WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that the variances meet the general intent and purpose of the City sign regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: Section 1. Two variances to the requirements of Section 110 -36, entitled "Ground signs," are hereby granted for one existing ground sign at 2700 PGA Boulevard in the City of Palm Beach Gardens, as more specifically defined as follows: a. A variance to the requirement of the minimum linear frontage on a public right -of -way needed to allow a ground sign. The subject property has approximately 100 feet of linear frontage on PGA Boulevard. The Code requires a minimum of 300 feet of linear frontage along a public right -of -way for allowing one ground sign at a site. Therefore, the variance granted is for 200 feet of linear frontage along PGA Boulevard. b. A variance to the requirement of the minimum setback for a ground sign from the front property line. The current setback of the subject ground sign is approximately two feet. The Code requires that a ground sign be set back at least 15 feet from the front property line. Therefore, the variance granted is to reduce the front setback from 15 feet to two feet from the front property line along PGA Blvd. Prepared on: October 23, 2000 Public hearing on: November 2, 2000 Section 3. Said approval shall be consistent with the attached exhibit filed with the City's Growth Management Department as follows: 1. Elevations and three - dimensional Renderings of the subject sign prepared by Sign Craft and received on October 10, 2000 by the Planning and Zoning Division. Section 4. All resolutions in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 5. This resolution shall be effective upon adoption. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 2000. ATTEST: An CAROL GOLD, CITY CLERK VOTE: MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR JABLIN COUNCILWOMAN FURTADO COUNCILMAN CLARK COUNCILMAN SABATELLO G:TaIaINAR- 99- 07- re -wpd 2 JOSEPH RUSSO, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY. LEONARD RUBIN, CITY ATTORNEY AYE NAY ABSENT CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: 10/20/00 Meeting Date: 11/02/00 Subject/Agenda Item Resolution 86, 2000, Authorizing the Initial Assessment Resolution for the PGA Flyover Assessment Area. Recommendation /Motion: Consider a motion to approve Resolution 86, 2000. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ 0 Council Action: (Total) City Attorne Finance [ ] Approved $ 0 [ ] Approved w/ Finance Current FY conditions [ ] Denied ACM Advertised: Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Other Date: [ ] Operating Attachments: Paper: [ X ] Not Required [ ] Other Memorandum Submitted by: Kent R. Olson Department Director Affected parties [ ] Notified Budget Acct. #: [ ] None Approved by: City Manag [ X ] Not required BACK OUND: See attached memorandum. CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: O bier 20, 2000 APPROVED: Ronald M. Ferris, Interim City Manager FROM: Kent R. Olson, Finance Director W SUBJECT: Resolution 86, 2000 — Initial Assessment Resolution BACKGROUND The City of Palm Beach Gardens hired Government Services Group and Nabors, Giblin & Nickerson at the May 18, 2000 Regular City Council Meeting to devise a plan for funding the PGA Flyover enhancements. As you may recall, the City of Palm Beach Gardens will be issuing debt to fund these improvements, paying our share of the cost directly to the Florida Department of Transportation. The consultants recommended and the Council agreed to move forward with a Special Assessment Area overlayed with a Tax Increment Financing District. Ordinance 27, 2000 provides the City with the authority to levy a special assessment. Resolution 86, 2000 specifies, among other things, the area to be included in the assessment as well as how the assessment will be distributed. A final assessment resolution will be prepared for the November 2 Council Meeting. At that meeting, the final resolution will subject to a public hearing before it is adopted. DISCUSSION Resolution 86, 2000 provides the specifics for the assessment area and the Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District that will fund the amenities for the PGA Flyover. The assessment area will include only commercial properties along the PGA Boulevard corridor from I -95 to the Intracoastal waterway. The TIF will contribute 50% of the growth in existing properties toward the repayment of the debt for the project. However, the TIF will be adjusted to exclude any increase in property value due to new improvements in the first year that these new improvements are reflected on the tax rolls. The remainder of the annual debt service will be distributed among the assessment area properties. Based upon historical trends, these assessments will decline annually, likely going down to zero after four years. The annual maintenance cost for the landscaping is estimated to be approximately $84,000 per year. This estimate was provided by Total Maintenance Services, which currently maintains the landscaped medians throughout the City. The City will also be required to maintain the decorative lighting and pay for the energy costs for these lights as well. The City Engineer has estimated this cost to be $60,000 per year. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Resolution 86, 2000, providing for an assessment area for the PGA Flyover project. CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA PGA FLYOVER ASSESSMENT AREA INITIAL ASSESSMENT RESOLUTION ADOPTED OCTOBER 5, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION SECTION 1.01. DEFINITIONS ........ ............................... 1 SECTION 1.02. INTERPRETATION .... ............................... 8 SECTION 1.03. GENERAL FINDINGS . . ............................... 8 ARTICLE II NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING SECTION 2.01. ESTIMATED CAPITAL COST .......................... 12 SECTION 2.02. ASSESSMENT ROLL . ............................... 12 SECTION 2.03. PUBLIC HEARING ... ............................... 12 SECTION 2.04. NOTICE BY PUBLICATION ........................... 12 SECTION 2.05. NOTICE BY MAIL ... ............................... 13 ARTICLE III ASSESSMENTS SECTION 3.01. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AREA ...... 14 SECTION 3.02. PGA FLYOVER ENHANCEMENT FUNDING ............ 14 SECTION 3.03. IMPOSITION OF ASSESSMENTS ...................... 15 SECTION 3.04. COMPUTATION OF ASSESSMENTS ................... 16 SECTION 3.05. APPLICATION OF ASSESSMENT PROCEEDS ............ 18 ARTICLE IV GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 4.01. METHOD OF COLLECTION .......................... 19 SECTION 4.02. SEVERABILITY ..... ............................... 19 SECTION 4.03. INTENT FOR REIMBURSEMENT FROM BOND PROCEEDS. 19 SECTION 4.04. EFFECTIVE DATE ... ............................... 20 1 APPENDIX A MAP OF PGA FLYOVER ASSESSMENT AREA APPENDIX B MAP OF TAX INCREMENT AREA APPENDIX C FORM OF PUBLISHED NOTICE APPENDIX D FORM OF MAILED NOTICE ii RESOLUTION 86, 2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, RELATING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN LOCAL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE PROPOSED PGA FLYOVER ASSESSMENT AREA; DETERMINING THE ESTIMATED CAPITAL COST OF THE PGA FLYOVER ENHANCEMENTS; ESTABLISHING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS; ESTABLISHING A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER IMPOSITION OF THE PROPOSED ASSESSMENTS AND THE METHOD OF THEIR COLLECTION; DIRECTING THE PROVISION OF NOTICE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS: ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS AND CONSTRUCTION SECTION 1.01. DEFINITIONS. As used in this Resolution, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context hereof otherwise requires. "Adjusted Tax Increment" means the amount computed each Fiscal Year pursuant to Section 3.04(B) hereof. "Annual Debt Service Component" means the amount computed for each Tax Parcel pursuant to Section 3.04(F) hereof. "Annual Debt Service Factor" means the factor computed pursuant to Section 3.04(E) hereof. "Assessment" means an annual special assessment imposed against certain property located within the PGA Flyover Assessment Area to fund the Project Cost of the PGA Flyover Enhancements, and related expenses, computed in the manner described in Section 3.04 hereof. "Assessment Area" means the proposed PGA Flyover Assessment Area described in Section 3.01 hereof. "Assessment Roll" means a non -ad valorem assessment roll relating to the Project Cost of the PGA Flyover Enhancements, and related expenses. "Base Year" means the calendar year commencing January 1, 2001, the year in which construction of the PGA Flyover Enhancements will commence. "Capital Cost" means all or any portion of the expenses that are properly attributable to the acquisition, design and construction of the PGA Flyover Enhancements and imposition of the Assessments under generally accepted accounting principles; and including reimbursement to the City for any funds advanced for Capital Cost and interest on any interfund or intrafund loan for such purposes. "City" means the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. "City Council" means the City Council for the City. 2 "City Clerk" means the official custodian of all City records and papers of an official character, or such person's designee. "City Manager" means the City's Manager, or such person's designee. "Collection Cost" means the estimated cost to be incurred by the City during any Fiscal Year in connection with the collection of Assessments. "Collection Cost Component" means the amount computed for each Tax Parcel pursuant to Section 3.04(G) hereof. i "Commercial Property" means commercial property within the Assessment Area for which the PGA Flyover Enhancements will provide enhanced commercial viability. "Commercial Property" will include Tax Parcels to which the Property Appraiser has assigned DOR Codes of 10 through 49 (commercial and industrial). "Commercial Property Percentage" means the percentage of the PGA Flyover Enhancements' Capital Cost that is attributable to Commercial Property, as determined pursuant to Section 3.02(A)(2) hereof. hereof. "Debt Service Amount" means the amount computed pursuant to Section 3.04(A) "DOR Code" means a property use code established in Rule 12D- 8.008, Florida Administrative Code, as applied by the Property Appraiser. 3 "Final Assessment Resolution" means the resolution described in Section 2.07 of the Ordinance which shall confirm, modify or repeal this Resolution and which shall be the final proceeding for the imposition of the Assessments within the Assessment Area. "Fiscal Year" means the period commencing on October 1 of each year and continuing through the next succeeding September 30, or such other period as may be prescribed by law as the fiscal year for the City. "Funding Agreement" means the agreement pursuant to which the City agrees to deliver the Obligations against payment therefor by the purchaser or underwriter of such Obligations. "Government Property" means the property owned by the United States of America, the State of Florida, a county, a special district, a municipal corporation, or any of their respective agencies or political subdivisions. "Government Property Percentage" means the percentage of the PGA Flyover Enhancements' Capital Cost that is attributable to Government Property, as determined pursuant to Section 3.02(A)(1) hereof. "Grant" means any sum of money received by the City from any public or private agency as or on account of a grant or contribution for construction of the PGA Flyover Enhancements, that is restricted as to use and not repayable by the City. M "Local Improvement" means a capital improvement program or plan for the construction or installation by the City for the special benefit of a neighborhood or other local area, for which special assessments may be imposed pursuant to the Ordinance. "Modified Debt Service Amount" means the amount computed pursuant to Section 3.04(D) hereof. "Obligations" means Original Obligations or Refunding Obligations. "Ordinance" means Ordinance No. 27, 2000, the Capital Project Assessment Ordinance. "Original Obligations" means bonds or other evidence of indebtedness including but not limited to, notes, commercial paper, capital leases or any other obligation issued or incurred to finance a portion of the Project Cost of the PGA Flyover Enhancements and secured, in whole or in part, by proceeds of the Improvement Assessments. "PGA Flyover Enhancements" means the additional improvements to the flyover at the intersection of AIA and PGA Boulevard that are expected to enhance the commercial identity of the surrounding area and improve the unattractive appearance of a standard elevated road structure including, but not limited to, decorative pylons, streetlights and railings, bridge facade, planter walls, fountain, additional landscaping and irrigation as more particularly described in the Joint Participation Agreement between the City and the Florida Department of Transportation. 5 "Project Cost" means (A) the Capital Cost of the PGA Flyover Enhancements, (B) the Transaction Cost associated with the Obligations attributable to the PGA Flyover Enhancements, (C) interest accruing on such Obligations for such period of time as the City deems appropriate, (D) the debt service reserve fund or account, if any, established for the Obligations attributable to the PGA Flyover Enhancements, and (E) any other costs or expenses related thereto. "Property Appraiser" means the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser. "Refunding Obligations" means a series of bonds or other evidence of indebtedness including but not limited to, notes, commercial paper, capital leases or any other obligations of the City issued or incurred to refund all or any portion of the Original Obligations or any indebtedness issued to refinance the Original Obligations. "Statutory Discount Amount" means the amount computed for each Tax Parcel pursuant to Section 3.04(H) hereof. "Tax Increment Area" means the property located in the current predominantly developed area of the City, as more specifically identified in Appendix B attached hereto. "Tax Increment Credit" means the amount computed each Fiscal Year pursuant to Section 3.04(C) hereof. "Taxable Value" means the value used to compute ad valorem taxes for any Tax Parcel, as shown on the Tax Roll used by the Property Appraiser to certify the taxable value of real property not exempt from taxation within the City pursuant to Section 200.065(1), on Florida Statutes; provided, however, the "Taxable Value" for Government Property shall be the value for such property as listed in the Tax Roll. "Tax Parcel" means a parcel of property to which the Property Appraiser has assigned a distinct ad valorem property tax identification number. "Tax Roll" means the real property ad valorem tax assessment roll maintained by the Property Appraiser for the purpose of the levy and collection of ad valorem taxes. "Transaction Cost" means the costs, fees and expenses incurred by the City in connection with the issuance and sale of any series of Obligations, including but not limited to (A) rating agency and other financing fees; (B) the fees and disbursements of bond counsel; (C) the underwriters' discount; (D) the fees and disbursements of the City's financial advisor; (E) the costs of preparing and printing the Obligations, the preliminary official statement, the final official statement, and all other documentation supporting issuance of the Obligations; (F) the fees payable in respect of any municipal bond insurance policy; (G) administrative, development, credit review, and all other fees associated with any pooled commercial paper or similar interim financing program; and (H) any other costs of a similar nature incurred in connection with issuance of such Obligations. "Uniform Assessment Collection Act" means Sections 197.3632 and 197.3635, Florida Statutes, or any successor statutes authorizing the collection of non -ad valorem assessments on the same bill as ad valorem taxes, and any applicable regulations promulgated thereunder. 7 SECTION 1.02. INTERPRETATION. Unless the context indicates otherwise, words importing the singular number include the plural number, and vice versa; the terms "hereof," "hereby," "herein," "hereto," "hereunder" and similar terms refer to this Resolution; and the term "hereafter" means after, and the term "heretofore" means before, the effective date of this Resolution. Words of any gender include the correlative words of the other gender, unless the sense indicates otherwise. SECTION 1.03. GENERAL FINDINGS. It is hereby ascertained, determined and declared that: (A) Pursuant to Article VIII, Section 2(b) of the Florida Constitution, and Sections 166.021 and 166.041, Florida Statutes, the City Council has all powers of local self- government to perform municipal functions and to render municipal services except when prohibited by law and such power may be exercised by the enactment of legislation in the form of City ordinances. (B) The City Council may exercise any governmental, corporate, or proprietary power for a municipal purpose except when expressly prohibited by law, and the City Council may legislate on any subject matter on which the Legislature may act, except those subjects described in (a), (b), (c), and (d) of Section 166.021(3), Florida Statutes. The subject matter of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of Section 166.021(3), Florida Statutes, is not relevant to imposition of assessments related to Local Improvements within the City. (C) The City Council has enacted the Ordinance to provide for the creation of Assessment Areas (as defined in the Ordinance) and authorize the imposition of assessments to fund the construction of Local Improvements to benefit the certain property located therein. (D) The City Council desires to create the PGA Flyover Assessment Area as an Assessment Area under the Ordinance to fund the Project Cost of the PGA Flyover Enhancements. The PGA Flyover Enhancements constitute a Local Improvement, as defined in the Ordinance and herein. (E) Construction of the PGA Flyover Enhancements will provide a special benefit to Commercial Property located within the Assessment Area by enhancing their commercial identity as the commercial center for the City, thus promoting the desirability of the Assessment Area as a place to conduct commerce and trade. (F) Enhancing the Assessment Area's identity as a commercial center is expected to result in additional business for commercial enterprises, thus increasing the marketability and increasing the value of Commercial Property located in the Assessment Area. (G) Based upon the foregoing, Commercial Property located within the Assessment Area will derive a special benefit from construction of the PGA Flyover Enhancements. Accordingly, the City Council hereby finds it reasonable to allocate the Capital Cost to each Tax Parcel containing Commercial Property based on each Tax Parcel's relative value compared to the aggregate value of the Assessment Area. E (H) Since the PGA Flyover Enhancements are intended to enhance the commercial viability of Commercial Property located in the Assessment Area, special assessments will be imposed only against Commercial Property. (I) The boundaries of the Assessment Area are based upon natural boundaries or major roadways separating the predominately commercial area from predominately residential areas. All Commercial Property located within the Assessment Area will derive a special benefit from construction of the PGA Flyover Enhancements. Commercial Property located adjacent to the Assessment Area but outside of its boundaries is different in character and does not derive a special benefit from construction of the PGA Flyover Enhancements. (J) The City acknowledges that the Assessment Area includes property owned by public bodies that cannot be compelled to pay special assessments. The City intends to fund the Government Property Percentage of the debt service on the Obligations issued to fund the Capital Cost of the PGA Flyover Enhancements and impose Assessments to fund the Commercial Property Percentage of debt service on such Obligations. (K) The City recognizes that enhancing the Assessment Area's identity as the commercial center for the City and surrounding areas, thus increasing the marketability and increasing the value of Commercial Property located in the Assessment Area, will provide a secondary benefit to the City as a whole by increasing the tax base attributable to the Assessment and fostering additional development, which will increase the tax base in the Tax Increment Area. 10 (L) In recognition of these secondary benefits and the City's obligation to pay the Government Property Percentage of debt service on the Obligations, the City has determined that it would be equitable to provide a Tax Increment Credit equal to fifty percent (50 %) of the Adjusted Tax Increment, first to fund the City's obligations and second to reduce the special assessments that would otherwise be payable by the owners of Commercial Property within the Assessment Area. (M) Since the City will be required to provide its regular municipal services to improvements appearing on the ad valorem tax roll for the first time in years following the Base Year, it is reasonable to add the initial year value of such improvements to the aggregate Taxable Value for the Base Year for purposes of computing the Adjusted Tax Increment, thus excluding such value from the Tax Increment Credit. (N) The City Council hereby finds and determines that the Assessments, to be imposed in accordance with this Resolution, provide an equitable method of funding construction of the PGA Flyover Enhancements by fairly and reasonably allocating the cost based on the special benefit derived by Commercial Property, in the manner hereinafter described. 11 ARTICLE II NOTICE AND PUBLIC HEARING SECTION 2.01. . ESTIMATED CAPITAL COST. The estimated Capital Cost for the PGA Flyover Enhancements is $3,500,000. The Project Cost of the PGA Flyover Enhancements will be funded through the imposition of Assessments against Commercial Property located in the Assessment Area. SECTION 2.02. ASSESSMENT ROLL. The City Manager is hereby directed to prepare a final estimate of the Capital Cost for the PGA Flyover Enhancements and to prepare the preliminary Assessment Roll in the manner provided in the Ordinance. The City Manager shall apportion the Project Cost among the parcels of Commercial Property within the Assessment Area as reflected on the Tax Roll in conformity with Article IV hereof. The estimate of Capital Cost and the Assessment Roll shall be maintained on file in the offices of the City Clerk and open to public inspection. SECTION 2.03. PUBLIC HEARING. A public hearing will be conducted by the City Council at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as the matter can be heard, on November 2, 2000, in the City Council Chambers at 10500 N. Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, to consider (A) creation of the Assessment Area, (B) imposition of the Assessments, and (C) collection of the Assessments pursuant to the Uniform Assessment Collection Act. SECTION 2.04. NOTICE BY PUBLICATION. Upon completion of the Assessment Roll, the City Clerk shall publish a notice of the public hearing authorized by 12 Section 2.03 hereof in the manner and the time provided in Section 2.05 of the Ordinance. Such notice shall be in substantially the form attached hereto as Appendix C. SECTION 2.05. NOTICE BY MAIL. Upon completion of the Assessment Roll, the City Clerk shall, at the time and in the manner specified in Section 2.06 of the Ordinance, provide first class mailed notice of the public hearing authorized by Section 2.03 hereof to each property owner proposed to be assessed at the address indicated on the Tax Roll. Such notice shall be in substantially the form attached hereto as Appendix D. 13 ARTICLE III ASSESSMENTS SECTION 3.01. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AREA. The proposed Assessment Area shall include certain property located in the City Center Overlay Planning District, as more specifically identified in Appendix A attached hereto. The Assessment Area is proposed for the purpose of enhancing the business value of Commercial Property located therein by funding construction of the PGA Flyover Enhancements. SECTION 3.02. PGA FLYOVER ENHANCEMENT FUNDING. (A) The City acknowledges that there is a significant amount of Government Property located within the Assessment Area that may derive some benefit from construction of the PGA Flyover Enhancements. The City intends to fund the Government Property Percentage of the debt service on Obligations issued to fund the Capital Cost of the PGA Flyover Enhancements and impose Assessments to fund the Commercial Property Percentage of debt service on such Obligations. (1) The "Government Property Percentage" shall be 12.75 %, which was computed by dividing (a) the aggregate Taxable Value of Government Property in the Assessment Area on the date of this Resolution by (b) the sum of (i) the aggregate Taxable Value of Government Property in the Assessment Area on the date of this 14 Resolution and (ii) the aggregate Taxable Value of Commercial Property in the Assessment Area on the date of this Resolution. (2) The "Commercial Property Percentage" shall be 87.25 %, which was computed by dividing (a) the aggregate Taxable Value of Commercial Property in the Assessment Area on the date of this Resolution by (b) the sum of (i) the aggregate Taxable Value of Government Property in the Assessment Area on the date of this Resolution and (ii) the aggregate Taxable Value of Commercial Property in the Assessment Area on the date of this Resolution. (B) In addition to contributing the Government Property Percentage of debt service on the Obligations, the City will contribute 50% of the Adjusted Tax Increment to reduce the Assessments against Commercial Property; provided however, that the amount generated by 50% of the Adjusted Tax Increment shall be applied first to payment of the Government Property Percentage of debt service on the Obligations. The Tax Increment Credit shall be applied and Assessments computed in the manner set forth in Section 3.04 hereof. (C) The proceeds of any Grant received by the City shall be used to reduce the Capital Cost of the PGA Flyover Enhancements if received prior to the issuance of Obligations. After the issuance of the Obligations, proceeds of any Grant shall be used to redeem Obligations. SECTION 3.03. IMPOSITION OF ASSESSMENTS. The Assessments shall be imposed against all Tax Parcels containing Commercial Property located within the Assessment Area for each Fiscal Year in which the Obligations remain outstanding, the 15 amount of which shall be computed in accordance with this Article IV. When imposed, the Assessment for each Fiscal Year shall constitute a lien upon such Tax Parcels, pursuant to the Ordinance. SECTION 3.04. COMPUTATION OF ASSESSMENTS. The Assessments will be imposed for each Fiscal Year in which Obligations remain outstanding and collected on the ad valorem tax bill in the manner authorized by the Uniform Assessment Collection Act. The annual Improvement Assessment shall be computed for each Tax Parcel containing Commercial Property in the manner set forth in this Section 3.04. (A) DEBT SERVICE AMOUNT. A "Debt Service Amount" shall be computed for each Fiscal Year as the amount which would be payable in respect of the Obligations in accordance with a debt service schedule prepared under the following assumptions: (1) the principal installments equal those established in the Funding Agreement, and (2) the Obligations bear interest at a rate one full percentage point in excess of the actual rates; provided, however, that the "Debt Service Amount" for any Fiscal Year shall not exceed the principal amount of Obligations then outstanding plus interest thereon. In the first Fiscal Year the Assessments are imposed, the City may use an estimated debt service schedule, provided that the Funding Agreement will be executed before the end of such Fiscal Year. (B) ADJUSTED TAX INCREMENT. An "Adjusted Tax Increment" shall be computed for each Fiscal Year by dividing (1) the amount computed by subtracting (a) the amount of ad valorem taxes which would have been levied within the Tax Increment Area by applying the same millage rate to the sum of (i) the aggregate Taxable Value of 16 Commercial Property in the Assessment Area for the Base Year, and (ii) the initial year value of improvements appearing on the ad valorem Tax Roll for the first time in years following the Base Year, from (b) the amount of ad valorem taxes levied by the City within the Tax Increment Area for such Fiscal Year, exclusive of any amount from any debt service millage, by (2) the factor of 0.95. (C) TAX INCREMENT CREDIT. A "Tax Increment Credit" shall be computed for each Fiscal year by (1) multiplying (a) the Adjusted Tax Increment by (b) the factor of 0.50, and (2) deducting the Government Property Percentage of the Debt Service Amount. If the Government Property Percentage of the Debt Service Amount exceeds the amount computed by multiplying the Adjusted Tax Increment by the factor of 0.50, the "Tax Increment Credit" shall be zero. (D) MODIFIED DEBT SERVICE AMOUNT. A "Modified Debt Service Amount" shall be computed for each Fiscal Year by subtracting (1) the Tax Increment Credit, from (2) the Commercial Property Percentage of the Debt Service Amount. (E) ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE FACTOR. An "Annual Debt Service Factor" shall be computed for each Tax Parcel by dividing (1) the Taxable Value for such Tax Parcel by (2) the aggregate Taxable Value of Commercial Property in the Assessment Area. (F) ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE COMPONENT. The "Annual Debt Service Component" shall be computed for each Fiscal Year for each Tax Parcel by multiplying (1) the Modified Debt Service Amount by (2) the Annual Debt Service Factor for such Tax Parcel. 17 (G) COLLECTION COST COMPONENT. The "Collection Cost Component" shall be computed each Fiscal Year for each Tax Parcel by (1) dividing (a) the Taxable Value for such Tax Parcel by (b) the aggregate Taxable Value of Commercial Property in the Assessment Area, and (2) multiplying the result by the Collection Cost. (H) STATUTORY DISCOUNT AMOUNT. The "Statutory Discount Amount" shall be computed for each Tax Parcel as the amount allowed by law as the maximum discount for early payment of ad valorem taxes and non -ad valorem assessments, such amount to be calculated by deducting (1) the sum of (a) the Annual Debt Service Component and (b) the Collection Cost Component, from (2) the amount computed by dividing (a) the sum of (i) the Annual Debt Service Component and (ii) the Collection Cost Component, by (b) the factor of 0.96. (I) ASSESSMENT. The annual Assessment for each Tax Parcel shall be computed as the sum of (1) the Annual Debt Service Component, (2) the Collection Cost Component and (3) the Statutory Discount Amount. SECTION 3.05. APPLICATION OF ASSESSMENT PROCEEDS. Proceeds from the Assessments received during each Fiscal Year shall be applied by the City for payment of the Collection Costs, payment of any Transaction Costs not funded from proceeds of the Obligations, payment of interest due on the Obligations, and payment of principal due on the Obligations. Any remaining proceeds will then be used for prepayment of the Obligations. ARTICLE IV GENERAL PROVISIONS SECTION 4.01. METHOD OF COLLECTION. The Assessments shall be collected pursuant to the Uniform Assessment Collection Act, provided however, that any Assessments imposed against Government Property shall be collected pursuant to Section 3.04 of the Ordinance. SECTION 4.02. SEVERABILITY. If any clause, section or provision of this Resolution shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason or cause, the remaining portion of said Resolution shall be in full force and effect and be valid as if such invalid portion thereof had not been incorporated herein. SECTION 4.03. INTENT FOR REIMBURSEMENT FROM BOND PROCEEDS. The City is hereby authorized to temporarily advance funds for the payment of the Capital Cost of the PGA Flyover Enhancements, such advances to be reimbursed from proceeds of tax - exempt Obligations. The City intends this Section 4.03 to satisfy the "Official Intent Requirement" described in U.S. Treasury Regulations Section 1.150 -2 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Internal Revenue Code "). The City declares that it reasonably expects that the Capital Cost for the PGA Flyover Enhancements will be reimbursed with the proceeds of bonds (as defined in Section 150 of the Internal Revenue Code). The maximum principal amount of bonds expected to be issued for the Capital Cost of the PGA Flyover Enhancements is $4,000,000. 19 SECTION 4.04. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of November, 2000. ATTEST MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY CAROL GOLD, CMC, CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR JABLIN COUNCILMEMBER FURTADO COUNCILMEMBER CLARK COUNCILMEMBER SABATELLO 20- APPENDIX A MAP OF PGA FLYOVER ASSESSMENT AREA [TO BE ATTACHED] ^ y L 51 y I I I � 1.1 ; t1 it OCT 25 '00 06:19PM GOVT SERV CES lti P.2/2 k7 7 F m �r '-n Zq� 4E, llyirg 7-7 T0 Ul. L :71 ."Sam, ``• '� - -- .._.( �i �ii��, % t I ��, � ' a _'� - _ -_ _ - . � - -� �� - -��• ' � 1' j it Li APPENDIX B MAP OF TAX INCREMENT AREA [TO BE ATTACHED] �n� APPENDIX C FORM OF NOTICE TO BE PUBLISHED To Be Published , 2000 [MAP OF PGA FLYOVER ASSESSMENT AREA] NOTICE OF HEARING TO IMPOSE AND PROVIDE FOR COLLECTION OF NON -AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, will conduct a public hearing to consider creation of the PGA Flyover Assessment Area, as shown above, and to impose non -ad valorem assessments against certain property located therein and collecting the assessments on the ad valorem tax bill. The hearing will be held at 7:00 P.M. on December 7, 2000 in the City Council Chambers at 10500 N. Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons needing a special accommodation or an interpreter to participate in this proceeding should contact the City Clerk's office at (561) 799 -4120 at least 48 hours prior to the date of the hearing. All affected property owners have a right to appear at the hearing and to file written objections with the City Council within 20 days of this notice. Any person wishing to appeal any decision of the City Council with respect to any matter considered will need a record and may wish to ensure that a verbatim record is made. The assessments have been proposed to fund capital costs for construction of flyover enhancements to the AIA/PGA Boulevard flyover to serve the PGA Flyover Assessment Area. The assessment for each parcel of commercial property within the PGA Flyover Assessment Area will be based upon the taxable value of the parcel. Each year the City will calculate a credit equal to fifty percent of the annual growth in the surrounding area. In determining the credit, annual growth would not include the initial year value of improvements added to the tax roll in subsequent years. The City will apply this credit first to pay the assessment attributable to government property located in the assessment area and second to reduce the assessment payable by commercial property located in the assessment area. A more specific description is set forth in the Initial Assessment Resolution adopted by the City Council on November 2, 2000. Copies of the Initial Assessment Resolution, the plans and specifications for the project, and the preliminary assessment rolls are available for inspection at the offices of the City Clerk, located at 10500 N. Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. Annual capital assessments to fund the PGA Flyover Enhancements will be collected on the ad valorem tax bill for a period of 20 years, commencing with the tax bill to be mailed in November 2002. Failure to pay the assessments will cause a tax certificate to be issued against the property which may result in a loss of title. If you have any questions, please contact the Director of Finance at (561) 799- 4163. PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA C-1 APPENDIX D FORM OF NOTICE TO BE MAILED * * * ** THIS IS NOT A BILL * * * ** NOTICE OF HEARING TO IMPOSE AND PROVIDE FOR COLLECTION OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS IN THE PGA FLYOVER ASSESSMENT AREA _,2000 [Property Owner Name] [Street Address] [City, State and zip] Re: Tax Parcel Number [Insert Number] PGA Flyover Assessment Area Dear Property Owner: The PGA Flyover Assessment Area is being created to construct enhancements to the AIA/PGA Boulevard flyover (the "PGA Flyover Enhancements "). The construction costs of the PGA Flyover Enhancements will be funded by assessments against commercial property located within the PGA Flyover Assessment Area. The assessments for each parcel of property are based on the taxable value of the parcel. Each year the City will calculate a credit equal to fifty percent of the annual growth in the surrounding area. In determining the credit, annual growth would not include the initial year value of improvements added to the tax roll in subsequent years. The City will apply this credit first to pay the assessment attributable to government property located in the assessment area and second to reduce the assessment payable by commercial property located in the assessment area. A more specific description of the assessment program is set forth in the Initial Assessment Resolution adopted by the City Council on November 2, 2000. Copies of the Initial Assessment Resolution, the plans and specification for the PGA Flyover Assessment Area, and the preliminary assessment rolls including the special assessments are available for your review at the offices of the City Clerk, located at 10500 N. Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. Information regarding the assessment for your specific property, including the taxable value and frontage assigned to your property, is attached to this letter. The City intends to issue bonds to finance the capital costs of this assessment project. In order to reduce the total borrowing cost, the City will initially finance the capital cost by issuing variable rate bonds. At a later time, the City intends to convert the bonds to a fixed -rate anticipating that interest rates will be lower than those presently D -1 available. This financing plan will permit the capital cost attributable to your property to be amortized over a period of 20 years. The annual assessment will include: your share of the principal and interest on the bonds (after application of the annual credit); & your share of the collection cost of the assessments; and the maximum discount allowed for early payment under the Uniform Assessment Collection Act. The City expects to collect approximately $ per year for the purposes described in this notice. The City intends to include annual assessments on your ad valorem tax bill, commencing with the tax bill to be mailed in November 2002. Failure to pay your assessments will cause a tax certificate to be issued against the property which may result in a loss of title. The City Council will hold a public hearing at 7:00 P.M. on November 2, in the City Council Chambers at 10500 N. Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, for the purpose of receiving comments on the proposed assessments, including collection on the ad valorem tax bill. You are invited to attend and participate in the hearing. You may also file written objections with the City Council prior to or during the hearing. If you decide to appeal any decision made by the City Council with respect to any matter considered at the hearing, you will need a record of the proceedings and may need to ensure that a verbatim record is made, including the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be made. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need a special accommodation or an interpreter to participate in this proceeding, please contact the City Clerk's office at (561) 799 -4120 at least 48 hours prior to the date of the hearing. 4163. If you have any questions, please contact the Director of Finance at (561) 799- D -2 PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA * * * * * SEND NO MONEY NOW. THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE * * * * * PGA FLYOVER ASSESSMENT AREA [PROPERTY OWNER NAME] Tax Parcel Number [INSERT NUMBER] Taxable Value attributed to property: Annual Assessment: Number of annual payments: Expected date of first bill: Total amount of annual payments: [INSERT NUMBER] $[INSERT AMOUNT] 20 November 2002 $[INSERT AMOUNT] * * * * * SEND NO MONEY NOW. THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE * * * * * CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 23, 2000 SUBJECT /AGENDA ITEM: Consideration of approval of Resolution 100, 2000, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Embankment Easement in favor of Palm Beach County in exchange for compensation in the amount of $1,982.00. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Resolution 100, 2000 Reviewed by: City AttorneyCP;1 Submitted by: City Attorney Approved by: City Manager Originating Dept: City Attorney Advertised: Date: Paper: [ X] Not Required Affected parties: [ ] Notified [ X] Not Required Costs: Not Applicable Funding Source: Not applicable Council Action: [ ] Approved [ ] Approved with conditions [ ] Denied [ ] Continued to: Attachments: Resolution 100, 2000 Embankment Easement Back up Materials M E M O R A N D U M WATTERSON, HYLAND & KLETT, P.A. To: Hon. Mayor and City Council From: Leonard G. Rubin, City Attorney Subject: Northlake Boulevard Embankment Easement Date: October 23, 2000 This is a request for approval of Resolution No. 100, 2000, authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Embankment Easement in favor of Palm Beach County. By letter dated August 18, 2000, Palm Beach County notified the City that it was seeking to acquire right -of -way for the widening of Northlake Boulevard. Specifically, Palm Beach County is seeking an easement for an 8 footwide strip of land located on the City Golf Course property adjacent to the north side of Northlake Boulevard. The property acquired by the easement will be used for a perimeter berm. In exchange for the grant of the easement, Palm Beach County will pay the City the sum of $1,982.00. Please be advised that Palm Beach County has filed a Petition for Eminent Domain for the taking of said property and that the sum set forth above represents the County's determination of the value of same. Should the City Council agree to the execution of the easement, the County will pay the City the agreed upon sum and the easement will be recorded, thereby resolving the eminent domain action. The proposed easement and compensation have been reviewed by both the City Engineer and the Acting Growth Management Director, who had no comments. Please be advised that the City may contest this matter and seek additional compensation. However, given the negligible impact on the City property, the sum offered appears to be reasonable. Should you have any questions relative to the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact me. P: \CP W i n \History\000306A \446.23 (scw)(319.055) RESOLUTION 100, 2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYORAND CITY CLERKTO EXECUTE AN EMBANKMENT EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF PALM BEACH COUNTY IN EXCHANGE FOR COMPENSATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,982.00; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City received notification from Palm Beach County that it would be initiating an eminent domain action to effectuate a taking of an Embankment Easement along the City Golf Course property, in connection with the widening of Northlake Boulevard; and WHEREAS, Palm Beach County offered compensation to the City in the amount of $1,982.00 for the proposed taking and has filed a Petition for Eminent Domain; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that it is in the best interests of the City to execute an Embankment Easement in favor of Palm Beach County in exchange for the compensation offered by the County. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute an Embankment Easement in favor of Palm Beach County, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference, in exchange for compensation in the amount of $1,982.00. Section 2. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. RESOLVED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 2000. MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO ATTESTED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: CITY CLERK CITY ATTORNEY -1- VOTE: MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR JABLIN COUNCILMAN SABATELLO COUNCILWOMAN FURTADO COUNCILMAN CLARK AYE NAY ABSENT -2- L l INC. CONSUMING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & ,0APPERS CIVIL AGRICULTURAL WAFER RESOURCF', WATER & WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING & NIAPPING CIS "Partners For Results Value by Design" 3550 S.W. Corporate Pkwy. Palm City, FL 34990 (561) 286 -3883 Fax: (561) 286-3925 wwwJbfh.com MEMORANDUM TO: Len Rubin FROM: Sean C. Donahue, P.E. DATE: September 22, 2000 FILE NO. 00 -4136 SUBJECT: Northlake Widening Adjacent to the PBG Golf Course Attached please find a copy of an embankment easement release form for the referenced project. The embankment easement is for an 8 -feet wide strip of land containing 0.247 acres located on the Golf Course property adjacent to the north side of Northlake Boulevard. We have reviewed the documents and we have no significant engineering concerns with the release of this property for the construction of an embankment. The construction plans for this project show that this area will be filled with '/2 of a perimeter berm associated with the widening of Northlake Boulevard. If the embankment easement is acceptable to the City, please help with the preparation of a Consent Item to be placed on the next available City Council Agenda. SCD/ cc: Roxanne Manning Len Lindahl, P.E. Dan Clark, P.E. PAPROJECTSTBGMEM0\4136W 136a C�tde�s Moth � Return to: Right -of -way Acquisition Section Iiame: Palm Beach County Engineering Post Office Box 21229 Address: West Palm Beach, Florida 33416 Attn: JOYCE M. BOYER Acct. No.:001- 360 -4240 This Instrument Prepared by: Name: Paul F. King, Assistant County Attorney Palm Beach County Address: Post Office Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416 P.C. No.:52- 41- 42- 14 -00- 000 -1010 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR PROCESSING DATA (Corporation) TO BE RECORDED WITHOUT BOARD OP COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCEPTANCE DATE SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR PROCESSING DATA PROJECT NO:1995507 ROAD:NORTHLAKE BLVD / COCONUT BL TO IBIS BL PARCEL NO: 206 EMBANKMENT EASEMENT THIS EASEMENT, made this day of , 2000, between CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION the parties of the first part, and PALM BEACH COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, as the party of the second part. WITNESSETH: That the parties of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of ONE ($1.00) dollar and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grant (s) unto the party of the second part, its successors and assigns, an embankment easement over, upon, under, through and across the following described land, situate in Palm Beach County, Florida, to- wit: Property more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME unto the party of the second part, its successors and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties have hereto set their hand(s) and seal(s) the day and year first above written. (CORPORATE SEAL) Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS (Signature of two witnesses required by Florida law) Typed or printed name of Corporation Witness Typed or printed name of witness tness Typed or printed name of witness STATE OF COUNTY OF BY: ITS PRESIDENT Typed or printed name of president 10500 N. MILITARY TRAIL PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410 -4634 Mailing address ATTEST: ITS SECRETARY Typed or printed name of secretary BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared AS PRESIDENT, AND AS SECRETARY who is /are personally known to me or who has /have produced as identification and who did /did not take an oath, executed the foregoing instrument as such Officer(s) on behalf of the said Corporation for the uses and purposes therein expressed. WITNESS my hand and official seal this day of , 2000. Signed: Notary Public in and for the County and State aforementioned NOTARIAL SEAL 259 -LGL Rev. 01/12/00 W 0 c z M 0L MIS M old z rl I4� o r'- v N � z W °0 V L az m � N C c 7D5.82'� 1. 687.82' t I in co to l" 0 m o LEGEND: cc 50'R - STATION RIGHT OF BASELINE N M IJXHIBIT "A" 501 - STATION LEFT OF BASELINE :n = R= - RADIUS a I C= - CENTRAL ANGLE 71 1 O A= - ARC LENGTH STA - STATION v � `D m. R/W - RIGHT -OF -WAY 100.00' P, w N N0211'19 "E PBC or PBCo - PALM BEACH COUNTY ORB - OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK _ NORTH -SOUTH QUARTER SEC11%j P.B. -PLAT BOOK P.O.0 10.00' I LINE OF SECTION 14, T42S, R41E E.E. - EMBANKMENT EASEMENT -8.00' II NORTH J!-6 PARCEL 208 FT SCALE: 1"=100' THIS SKETCH IS �I m LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOT A SURVEY I R LINE I, (ORB 6546) An embankment easement in Section 14, being: 110.00* (PAGE 1206) Township 42 South, Range 41 East, the North 8.00 feet of the South 705.82 feet of -' the West One -half of the East One -half of said Section 14. 00 �'- L20'DRAINAGE Containing 0.247 acres (10,770.9 square feet), N EASEMENT more or less. TO P.B.Co. o I (ORB 6772) NOTES: rn I ( (PAGE 163) Bearing basis: N89'02'40'W along the North right- of-way line of Northlake Boulevard. 100.00' co ca CO I`D DJ = 0 0 N I THE DESCRIPTION SKETCH AND THE DESCRIPTION TEXT L o v o COMPRISE THE COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. P THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT VAUD UNLESS BOTH ACCOMPANY EACH OTHER. � � REPRODUCTIONS OF 1HIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT VALID m w Fn WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL CA to RAISED SEAL OF THE FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER NOTED BELOW. bW%6 5aFVEjf99 coa�sutTAarrs, rrr�, LB6853 8.00' EAST LINE OF THE WEST 1/2 10.04 S01'50'04 "W OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SEC.14 100. �� a .I o .°o CA BY: r I + MARK D. BROOKS -i to I r= CO PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR tV (A 00 j F I No. 3426 STATE OF D �on o 1 co I DATE: PROJ NO. 95 -507 a N Aessler & Associates SCALE 1 " =100' I m o f 11211 Prosperity Farms Road, Suite C -301 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 18 PATE 5/18/00 !TI � � _ � Phone (561) 627 -2226 Fax (561) 624 -1569 - SHEET i of 1 L4 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION No.LB3616 M �ACx c�G ORI�� September 5, 2000 Department of Engineering and Public Works P.O. Box 21229 West Palm Beach, FL 33416 -1229 Mr. Sean Donahue, Consulting Engineer (561) 684 -4000 City of Palm Beach Gardens www.co.palm- beach.fl.us 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 -4634 Re: Northlake Boulevard / Coconut Blvd. to Ibis Blvd. P.B.C. Project No. 199507 Palm Beach County Parcel 208 Board of County Embankment Easement Commissioners Maude Ford Lee. Chair Dear Sean: Warren H. Newell, Vice Chairman Per our telephone conversation today, I have enclosed copies of the documents Karen T. Marcus that have been sent to the City of Palm Beach Gardens previously, in regards to Carol A. Roberts the above captioned roadway construction project. Mary McCarty you stated you were familiar with the project through Messler's office. I am Burt Aaronson sorry there has been confusion as to who at the City would have possession of Tony Masilotti the offer letters that I have sent in June, and again in August. Unfortunately, the Florida Statutes have changed and decreased the amount of time that we have to deal with the property owners. County Administrator If you have any questions regarding the enclosed, please don't hesitate to contact me at 684 -4124. I decided to hand - deliver this personally, and I will Robert Weisman pick them up from you, upon settlement of this issue. Thank you for your help Sean. Sin rely, Joyce Nt.— Boyer, Right -of -Way Specialist Right -of -Way Acquisition "An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer- Enclosures Wprinted on recycled paper �tiACA �'O �LURI Department of Engineering and Public Works P.O. Box 21229 West Palm Beach. FL 33416 -1229 (561) 684 -4000 www.co.paim-beach.fl.us N. Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Maude Ford Lee, Chair Warren H. Newell. Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Roberts Mary McCarty Butt Aaronson Tony Masilotti County Administrator Robert Weisman -An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer' Wprinted on —yc %d paper August 18, 2000 City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 -4634 CERTIFIED MAIL NOTIFICATION AND OFFER LETTER RE: PROJECT NO.: 1995507 PROJECT NAME: Northlake Boulevard JOB LIMITS: Coconut Boulevard to Ibis Boulevard Coconut Boulevard South 1900' PARCEL NO.: 208 TYPE OF TAKING: Embankment Easement Dear Property Owner: Palm Beach County is in the process of acquiring the needed right -of -way for the widening /new construction for the above referenced roadway construction project. Public records indicate that you own property required for this project. It has been determined that a portion of your property will be needed by the County for this roadway project. If you no longer own the property, please advise us immediately. We have had your property appraised by a certified Real Estate Appraiser. Our appraiser has certified to us that the market value of your property required by the County is in the total amount of $1,982.00. The County hereby offers you the amount of $1,982.00 to purchase your property needed for the project. The following represents a breakdown of this total figure: LAND: $ -0- DAMAGES: $ -0- IMPROVEMENTS: $ -0- COST -TO -CURE: $_ -0- PERMANENT EMBANKMENT EASEMENT: $1,982.00 1 ACN c G a •c .A . �LORI�% This offer from Palm Beach County, based on the opinion of experts, represents full compensation for the property required from you. We have enclosed a Warranty Deed for the property that we need, and if you find the amount agreeable, please sign and return it to our office within the next 30 calendar days. A sheet of instructions for completing the Warranty Deed is included in this package. Payment for the parcel will take approximately six to eight weeks after we receive the deed (and any appropriate releases, if applicable). If we cannot agree on a purchase price, Palm Beach County does have the legal right to file a condemnation proceeding (as per statute) 30 days after this offer. If you decide not to accept this offer, and would like to submit a counteroffer, please do so within 30 days of receiving this offer. You also have the right to submit to the County a complete appraisal report on your property to be taken. We ask that you submit your appraisal report as soon as possible. This report should contain all the data upon which your appraiser's conclusions are based and should be prepared by an appraiser with appropriate qualifications for the type of project involved. The County will use this appraisal report, along with its own appraisal reports, in determining the acceptance or rejection of the counteroffer. If you would like a copy of the County's appraisal report, construction plans, parcel acquisition maps, or other documents that depict the taking, we will be glad to provide them, to the extent available. However, we would ask that you please submit your request to us in writing. The County will provide the documents requested to you within 15 business days of receipt of your request. RIGHTS GRANTED TO YOU AS A PROPERTY OWNER BY LAW: • The County will make an offer to purchase your property and must negotiate with you in good faith to reach a settlement. If we cannot agree on the purchase price, we can file a condemnation proceeding 30 days after your receipt of this offer. • Our offer of compensation includes full compensation for the property to be taken. Full compensation includes, but is not limited to the value of the property to be acquired, reasonable attorneys fees and costs for appraisals and other services. Where we seek to acquire a portion of your property, we also must compensate you for damages to the remaining property. • Where there is more than one owner of the property, notice to one owner constitutes notice to all owners. If there is a change in ownership of this property after the first notice, the County does not have to give notice or a written offer to subsequent owners. • You have the right to copies of appraisals, construction plans, maps and other documents to the extent available, as stated above. 2 KC A.4 a ►c �LORI�� PRE -SUIT MEDIATION: In order to encourage settlements before a proceeding is filed, the new laws allow the parties to submit their issues to non - binding mediation. This can occur if a settlement cannot be reached during negotiations. Both parties must agree to submit their issues of compensation to a mediator certified under Section 44.102. A mediator is a neutral third party who will assist the parties in reaching a mutual settlement. ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS You may elect to obtain an attorney to represent you during the negotiation phase of this project. If so, please have the enclosed Representative Authorization form completed and returned to us immediately. The County shall pay attorney's fees as provided below, as well as all reasonable costs incurred by you, including but not limited to reasonable appraisal fees, and when business damages are compensable, a reasonable accountant's fee. You will be required to submit copies of reports and complete invoices to receive such reimbursements. These reimbursements will take place at or after the closing and are in addition to that which is agreed to as the fair market value of your property. The law does place limitations on the amount that can be paid to you for an attorney. ( Due to such limitations, you could be liable for the difference from the amount allowed, so please review the information below carefully). If we reach a settlement prior to filing a condemnation proceeding in Circuit Court, we will pay attorney's fees based on a reasonable number of hours and reasonable hourly rate. If the County files a condemnation proceeding, the attorney's compensation shall be based solely on the benefits achieved for you in accordance with the schedule in Section 73.092, (2) C, of the Florida Statute attached herewith. "Benefits" are defined as the difference, exclusive of interest, between the final judgement or settlement and the last written offer made by the County before you hire an attorney. If the case is not settled and a condemnation proceeding is filed, you or your attorney may make an offer of judgment no sooner than 120 days after you file your answer to the lawsuit. This is called the defendant's offer of judgment. Please note that this amount is limited to a maximum of $100,000.00. If we reject your offer of judgment and the court award, excluding interest, is equal to or more than your offer of judgment, your attorney's fees will be paid based on the hourly rate the court would ordinarily expect to pay if the County were not responsible for payment. 3 ti �4 Y ✓� R, If you do not make an offer of judgment or the judgment is less than your offer of judgment, your attorney's fees will be paid based on a percentage of the benefit, as earlier defined, that your attorney achieved for you. There is no interest paid on fees and costs. Costs maybe limited if the County files an offer of judgment no sooner than 120 days from your answer to the condemnation proceeding. If you reject the County's offer and the judgment is equal to or less than the County's offer of judgment, you will be responsible for all costs, including Attorney's costs, that you incur after the date you reject the County's offer of judgment. The Court may also consider non - monetary benefits obtained for the client by his attorney. If you are a business owner, please see the "Notification Letter to Business Owners "enclosed. If your property is leased or rented, please complete the form that is enclosed and return it within 15 days of receipt of this letter. Also included in this package, you will find copies of the Florida Statutes that apply to Eminent Domain. In the case of any conflict or difference between the contents of this letter and the Florida Statutes, the Florida Statutes will govern. Palm Beach County is always willing to try to negotiate with owners to reach an agreeable settlement when acquiring the property needed for its projects. If you have any questions or comments, or need more information, please call the Right -of -Way Section at (561) 684 -4124 and Joyce M. Boyer, Right -of -Way Specialist, will be happy to assist in any way. Thank you for your cooperation. Sincerely, Tanya N. McConnell, P.E. Five Year Road Program Manager Roadway Production Division cc: Omelio A. Fernandez, P.E., Director, Engineering & Pub.Works Operations 2 PARCEL 208 - CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PROJECT NUMBER 95507 PROJECT NAME: NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD PREPARED FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS P.O. BOX 21229 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33416 -1229 AS OF APRIL 1, 2000 APPRAISERS PHILIP M. HOLDEN, MAI STATE - CERTIFIED GENERAL APPRAISER #0001666 AND SHARON L. MORGAN STATE - CERTIFIED GENERAL APPRAISER #0000626 S. F. HOLDEN, INC. 8259 NORTH MILITARY TRAIL, SUITE 10 PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410 JOB NO. 1817.3 REAL ESTATE APPRAISERS AND CONSULTANTS Licensed Real Estate Broker Square Lake Centre, Suite 10 8259 North Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410.6352 S.F.HOLDEN,INC. X5611 626-2004 Fax (561) 622-7631 PALM BEACH COUNTY CERTIFICATION OF VALUE Parcel No.: 208 Owner: City of Palm Beach Gardens Project: Northlake Boulevard, #95507 We certify that, to the best or our knowledge and belief: 1. The statements of fact contained in this report are true and correct. 2. The reported analyses, opinions, and conclusions are limited only by the reported assumptions and limiting conditions, and are our personal, unbiased professional analyses, opinions, and conclusions. 3. We have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject of this report, and we have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved. 4. Our compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined value or direction in the value that favors the cause of Palm Beach County, the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event. 5. Our analyses, opinions, and conclusion were developed, and this report has been prepared in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. 6. We have made a personal inspection of the property that is the subject of this report. 7. No one provided significant professional assistance to the persons signing this report. That our opinion of the market value of the property being appraised as of April 1, 2000, is shown as follows: , Appraised Value Market Value – Parent Tract (as vacant, undeveloped land) $1,401,500 Market Value – Remainder Parcel (as vacant, undeveloped land) $1,399,518 Value of Taking: Parcel 208 – Embankment Easement: 10,770.9 sq. ft. $1,982 Improvements 0 Plus Damages and /or Cost to Cure 0 Just Compensa ' $1,982 1— 1-- ad4o_x) 4v ?"S/4 Philip . H Date Sharon L. Morgan -/ DD -Ate, Stat ertified G eral Appraiser #0001666 State - Certified General Appraiser #0000626 Serving Florida since 1964 Commercial ♦ Industrial ♦ Agricultural ♦ Eminent Domain ♦ Litigation Westerly view of Parcel 208, embankment easement on City of Palm Beach Gardens ownership. Easterly view of Parcel 208. Project No. 95507 Northlake Boulevard Palm Beach County PARCEL 208 — CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS 1 This is a complete appraisal developed in a summary format for the purpose of estimating market value. Included in this appraisal by reference is a Data Book which contains details on the following: ♦ Definitions of interest appraised and value sought ♦ Scope of the appraisal ♦ Assumptions and limiting conditions ♦ All topics relating to, and analysis of, highest and best use ♦ Sales data ♦ Qualifications of the appraisers This report is intended for use by Palm Beach County, the client, in acquiring the property interests appraised. Parent Tract Owner of Record: City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 North Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 -4634 Legal Description: West % of East '/2 of Section 14, Township 42 South, Range 41 East, less the south 687.82 feet, Palm Beach County, Florida Location: The City of Palm Beach Gardens tract is located on the north side of Northlake Boulevard about 4 '/4 miles west of State Road 710, in the western part of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida Access: Access is available directly from the road frontage. Sale History: No sales in past five years. Zoning: P /I, Public /Institutional, by the City of Palm Beach Gardens Land Use Plan Designation: Golf Project No. 95507 Northlake Boulevard Palm Beach County 2 PARCEL 208 — CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS (CONTINUED) Parent Tract (Continued) Current Use: Municipal golf course Configuration: Rectangular with 1,346 feet of frontage on Northlake Boulevard and a typical depth of 4,650 feet Area: 140.15 acres Topography: Basically level, but rolling surface contours have been created as part of the golf course improvements. Major soil types are Riviera sand, a poorly drained sandy soil; jand Riviera sand, depressional, a similar soil in low areas. Improvements: Typical municipal golf course improvements Utilities: Electricity and telephone only Easements /Encroachments: None noted Assessment and Taxes: Control No.: 52- 41- 42- 14 -00- 000 -1010 1999 Assessed Value: $2,564,534 1999 Taxes: Municipal property — tax exempt Highest and Best Use As Vacant: Residential development at the maximum permitted density (see discussion in Data Book) As Improved: Continued use as a golf course r. Project No. 95507 Northlake Boulevard Palm Beach County 3 PARCEL 208 — CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS (CONTINUED) Parent Tract (Continued) APPRAISAL METHODOLOGY We have employed the sales comparison approach in valuing the subject. This approach involves a direct comparison of the subject with other similar properties which have recently sold in the same or reasonably similar market areas. The sales are compared to the subject on a price per acre basis, using elements of comparison such as date of sale and physical characteristics. Qualitative comparisons are made between the comparable properties and the subject reflecting dissimilarities between them. This process results in a value indication for the subject. We have valued the land underlying the City of Palm Beach Gardeps' municipal golf course as if it were vacant and subject to .the land use plan designation which is typical for similar parcels in this area, namely RR -10 (allowing one unit per ten acres). VALUATION We have identified three sales of properties which can be utilized to value the subject. The transactions occurred in the time period between June 1998 and October 1999. The key characteristics of the sale properties are summarized in the facing page table; complete detail on the transactions is included in the Data Book. The elements of comparison considered in analyzing the sale properties include property interest conveyed; conditions of sale; financing; date of sale; location; access; size; configuration; topography and soil conditions; availability of utilities; zoning /land use plan designations, and any development approvals in place. The property interest acquired in all cases was the fee simple estate; conditions of sale were reasonably typical and arm's length; financing terms, if any did not affect the price; there have been changes in market conditions during the relevant time period of Sales 3 and 5 that occurred in 1998. Therefore these sales are shown as inferior. Sale 3 required downward adjustments to the sale price for this property's smaller land area and absence of wetlands. Overall, this property is considered superior to the subject. SUMMARY OF COMPARABLE SALES AND COMPARISON WITH PALM BEACH GARDENS Sale No. Subject Sale 3 Sale 5 Sale 23 OR Book/Page N/A 10531/1541 10471/349 11189/1670 Location N side of Northlake Boulevard about 4 X miles W of SR 710 W side of South Road, 4% miles W of SR 7 NW corner of Northlake Blvd. and Memorial Park Rd SW corner of Jog Rd. and Flavor Pict Rd. Sale Date N/A July 1998 June 1998 June 1989 Sale Price N/A $695,000 $1,100,000 $833,880 LUP (ARR 10 RR -10 In RR t ituonal LR -3 Size 140.15 Acres 59.41 Acres 112 Acres 53.098 Acres Price /Acre N/A $11,698 $9,821 $15,704 QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS Property Interest Conveyed Similar Similar Similar Conditions of Sale Similar Similar Similar Financing Similar Similar Similar Date of Sale Inferior Inferior Similar Location Similar Inferior Superior Access /Exposure Similar Similar - Similar Size Superior Similar Superior Configuration Similar Inferior Similar Utilities Similar Superior Similar Topography Superior Similar Superior LUP Similar Superior Superior Approvals in Place Similar Similar Similar Overall Comparability Superior @ $11,698 per Acre Similar @ $9,821 per Acre Very Superior @ $15,704 per Acre Project No. 95507 Northlake Boulevard Palm Beach County PARCEL 208 — CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS (CONTINUED) Parent Tract (Continued) VALUATION (CONTINUED) 4 Sale 5 is superior to the subject for its access to water and sewer service and its potential for a higher density land use plan designation. It is inferior because of its irregular configuration and location abutting a cemetery. Overall, Sale 5 is considered similar to the subject. Sale 23 is much smaller than the subject and also has no wetlands, requiring downward adjustments. Additionally, it is better located and has a superior land use designation. This sale's indication is rated overall very superior to the subject. The sales indicated a range of potential values for the subject of $9,821 to $15,704 per acre. We have concluded at $10,000 per acre. The total value of the City of Palm Beach Gardens parent tract (land only) is calculated as follows: 140.15 Acres @ $10,000 per acre = $1,401,500 r < M Project No. 95507 Northlake Boulevard Palm Beach County PARCEL 208 — CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS (CONTINUED) Embankment Easement Property Description: Parcel 208 is an embankment easement 5 Location on Parent Tract: It is located along the southern boundary of the parent tract. Area and Configuration: It is eight feet wide and about 1,346 feet long, with an area of 10,770.9 square feet, or 0.247 acre. A sketch and legal description of this parcel is shown on the following page. Improvements in Taking: Term of the Easement: Valuation: Site improvements within Parcel 208 are not valued as it is assumed that they will be undisturbed or restored to a condition equal to or better than their current condition upon termination of road construction. We have assumed that the existing fencing and entrance improvements will not be affected by this acquisition. Permanent In the case of an embankment easement, it is our opinion that the property owner loses the great majority but not all of the bundle of rights accruing to the fee owner. For example, the parcel encumbered by the embankment easement can be included in the property's land area for density determination purposes. We have estimated that the fee owner will lose 80 percent of the value of the parcel encumbered by the embankment easement. The value of the parent tract has been estimated at $0.230 per square foot. The just compensation due the property owner for the embankment easement is calculated as follows: Easement Area Land Value Loss Percentage 10,770.9 square feet X $0.230 X 0.8 Value of Embankment Easement = $1,982 C) LEGEND: 50'R — STATION RIGHT OF BASELINE CD M C> 50'L — STATION LEFT OF BASELINE fv C.0 = R= — RADIUS N I i I C= — CENTRAL ANGLE MP I m ° I w;0 A= — ARC LENGTH M "' + STA — STATION ° a 4iO0 R/W — RIGHT —OF —WAY PBC or PBCo — PALM BEACH COUNTY ° 100.00' r N NO2'1 I'll 9 "E ORB — OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK _ NORTH —SOUTH QUARTER SECTION P.B. — PLAT BOOK P.O.C. ��l LINE OF SECTION 14, T42S, R41E E.E. — EMBANKMENT EASEMENT 10.00' 8.00' 1� � N ORT1 -I PAR(:EL 208 I 705.82'1 rr SCALE: 1" =100' THIS SKETCH IS o I LEGAL DESCRIPTION NOT A SURVEY I R W LINE IJ , (ORB 6646) An embankment easement in Section 14, m I 110.00 (PAGE 1.206) Township 42 South, Range 41 East, being: I I 0 687 82' ! } the North 8.00 feet of the South 705.82 feet of ti the West One —half of the Ecrst One —half of said M N t Section 14. o 00 20 'DRAINAGE Containing 0.247 acres (10,770.9 square feet), 0 Z �? N N I f EASEMENT more or less. C1 0 o TO P.B.Co. _ _ 1' (ORB 6772) NOTES: M M j 1 PAGE 163) Bearing basis: N89'02'40 "W along the North right - 10Q.00' of —way line of Northlake Boulevard. I 0 X �'to C3 f o THE DESCRIPTION SKETCH AND THE DESCRIPTION TEXT I Ln 0 0 o COMPRISE THE COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. o rl r*i THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS NOT VAUD UNLESS BOTH . g ACCOMPANY EACH OTHER. REPRODUCTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT VALID M w ! WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL 4S. RAISED SEAL OF THE FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND o ' i MAPPER NOTED BELOW. � � BJLD014S SuJ�Y��I'Nc� C4NSttLTfi'N75, TTtC. LB6853 EAST LINE OF THE WEST 1/2 10.00' - S01'50'04 "W OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SEC. 14 100.00' o BY: C13 = I o + MARK D. BROOKS 1 I r ca PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ►� o �r STATE OF ELADA No. 3426 o j 19 DATE: o D N Ressler & Asseclates 'ROJ NO. 95 -507 I D 0 I 11211 Prosperity Farms Road, Suite C -301 �cnLE 1" =100' I m r ° i-I Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 )ATE 5/18/00 f cn Phone (561) 627 -2226 Fax (551) 624 -1569 31EET i OF 1 I v CERTIFlCATE OF AUTHORIZATION No.LB3616 Project No. 95507 Northlake Boulevard Palm Beach County PARCEL 208 — CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS (CONTINUED) The Remainder Area and Dimensions Highest and Best Use Effect of Taking on the Remainder: The remainder still contains 140.15 acres but is encumbered with an embankment easement. The highest and best use of the parent tract does not change as a result of the taking. Therefore, the remainder retains the same highest and best use as the parent tract. Value estimate before taking Less: value of taking Value estimate after taking Value of the Remainder: The value of the remainder is estimated at $1,401,500 $1,982 $1,399,518 $1,399,518 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: 10/23/00 Meeting Date: 11/02/00 Subject/Agenda Item Resolution 102, 2000, Appointinq Huqh William Perry to the Board of Trustees of the Fire Fighters' Retirement Pension. Recommendation /Motion: Consider a motion to approve Resolution 102, 2000. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ 0 Council Action: (Total) City Attorn y Finance [ ] Approved $ 0 [ ] Approved w/ Finance Current FY conditions [ ] Denied ACM Advertised: Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Other Date: [ ] Operating Attachments: Paper: [ X ] Not Required [ ] Other Memorandum Submitted by: Kent R. Olson'' 6 Department Director Affected parties [ ] Notified Budget Acct. #: [ ] None Approved by: City Manager [ X ] Not required BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council APPROVED: Nabar E. Martinez, City Manager FROM: Kent R. Olson, Finance Directorkko SUBJECT: Resolution 102, 2000, Appointment to the BACKGROUND DATE: October 23, 2000 ' Pension Board The City's defined benefit pension plan for firefighters is governed by a Board of Trustees consisting of five members. The City Council appoints two residents to the Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund to serve as employer trustees. The firefighters elect two trustees, and these four trustees choose a fifth trustee to provide the Board with five members. All trustees serve for a two -year term and may succeed himself or herself. DISCUSSION Hugh William Perry has served as a City of Palm Beach Gardens trustee for the Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund for over six years. Bill's term will expire on November 7, thus the City Council needs to make an appointment to the pension board. Bill would like to continue serving, and we have no applications on file from other interested citizens at this time. Mr. Perry is a local attorney whose legal insight and background has been extremely helpful in the management of the Pension Fund. Bill will continue to be an asset to the pension board if re- appointed. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 102, 2000, appointing Hugh William Perry to the Board of Trustees for the Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund. RESOLUTION 102, 2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF ONE (1) MEMBER TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS FIREFIGHTERS' PENSION TRUST FUND; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 38 -53 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances provides for the appointment of members to the Board of Trustees of the Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 38 -53 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances, Hugh William Perry is hereby appointed as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Firefighters' Pension Trust Fund for two (2) years, which term of office shall expire on November 7, 2002. Section 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its adoption. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of November, 2000. ATTEST: CAROL GOLD, CMC, CITY CLERK VOTE: AYE MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR JABLIN COUNCILWOMAN FURTADO COUNCILMAN CLARK COUNCILMAN SABATELLO MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY. WATTERSON, HYLAND & KLETT, P.A. CITY ATTORNEY NAY ABSENT \\FILE SRV\FINADMIN\KENT\ ORDINANCES& RESOLUTIONS \RESOLUTION1022000.DOC CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: 10/23/00 Meeting Date: 11/02/00 Subject/Agenda Item Resolution 103, 2000, Appointing_ Kenneth Altman to the Board of Trustees of the Police Officers' Retirement Pension. Recommendation /Motion: Consider a motion to approve Resolution 103, 2000. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ 0 (Total) Council Action: City Attorne Finance [ ] Approved $ 0 [ ] Approved w/ Finance Current FY conditions [ ] Denied ACM Advertised: Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Other Date: [ J Operating Attachments: Paper: [ X ] Not Required [ ] Other Memorandum Submitted by: Kent R. Olson Department Director Affected parties [ ] Notified Budget Acct. #: [ ] None Approved by: �1,r City Manager / [ X ] Not required BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: October 23, 2000 APPROVED: Nabar E. Martinez, City Manager FROM: Kent R. Olson, Finance Director 00 SUBJECT: Resolution 103, 2000, Appointment to the Police Pension Board BACKGROUND The City's defined benefit pension plan for police officers is governed by a Board of Trustees consisting of five members. The City Council appoints two residents to the Police Officers' Retirement Trust Fund to serve as employer trustees. The police officers elect two trustees, and these four trustees choose a fifth trustee to provide the Board with five members. All trustees serve for a two -year term and may succeed himself or herself. DISCUSSION Kenneth Altman has served as a City of Palm Beach Gardens trustee for the Police Officers' Retirement Trust Fund for the past two years. Ken's term will expire on November 7, thus the City Council needs to make an appointment to the pension board. Mr. Altman would like to continue serving, and we have no applications on file from other interested citizens at this time. Ken, an enrolled actuary, is the former Executive Director of the New York State Employees Retirement System and Police and Firefighters' Retirement System. Ken will continue to be an asset to the pension board if re- appointed. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 103, 2000, appointing Kenneth Altman to the Board of Trustees for the Police Officers' Retirement Trust Fund. RESOLUTION 103, 2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF ONE (1) MEMBER TO THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS POLICE OFFICERS' RETIREMENT TRUST FUND; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 50 -82 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances provides for the appointment of members to the Board of Trustees of the Police Officers' Retirement Trust Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 50 -82 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances, Kenneth Altman is hereby appointed as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Police Officers' Retirement Trust Fund for two (2) years, which term of office shall expire on November 7, 2002. Section 2. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon its adoption. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of November, 2000. ATTEST: CAROL GOLD, CMC, CITY CLERK VOTE: AYE MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR JABLIN COUNCILWOMAN FURTADO COUNCILMAN CLARK COUNCILMAN SABATELLO LAKENT\ ORDINANCES& RESOLUTIONS\RESOLUTION1032000 .DOC MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY. WATTERSON, HYLAND & KLETT, P.A. CITY ATTORNEY NAY ABSENT e/ CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 20, 2000 SUBJECT /AGENDA ITEM First Reading: Ordinance 30 , 2000, a request to re -zone a 50 acre parcel of land from Planned Development Area to Public /Institutional with an overlay zoning of Planned Unit Development (PUD). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 30, 2000, which contains seven (7) conditions of aDDroval. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ Total Council Action: City Attorne Growth Management [ ] Approved Finance NA $ [ ] Approved w/ ACM Current FY conditions Human Res. NA [ ] Denied Other NA Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Advertised: Attachments: Date: [ ] Operating Paper: [ ] Other • Ordinance 30 , 2000 [X] Not Required • Legal Description u it by: rowth Management Affected parties Budget Acct. #:: Director [ ] Notified [ ] None Approved by: City Manager [X] Not required I. REQUEST Urban Design Studio, agent for The Benjamin Private School, Inc., is requesting a rezoning to Planned Unit Development (PUD) from the existing Planned Development Area zoning for the development of a high school campus. The site is located approximately %2 mile north of Hood Road, west of Central Boulevard. The 50 -acre site City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 20, 2000 Petition PUD -00-01 will contain 187,671 square feet of educational building space as well as athletic fields and amenities. (7- 42S -43E) II. BACKGROUND A. History This is a vacant parcel of land with Planned Development Area zoning. There have been no previous approvals by the City which affect the site, except for the requirement for a thoroughfare plan road to the south. B. Land Use and Zoninq The subject site is currently zoned Planned Development Area (PDA). The petitioner is proposing a Planned Unit Development zoning with an underlying zoning of Public /Institutional. The Comprehensive Plan requires that all lands currently zoned PDA be rezoned to either Planned Unit Development or Planned Community District. The property presently has a future land -use designation of Residential Low (RL), and is listed as Residential Low on the Vision Plan. The Comprehensive Plan requires that the City change the land use to Public during the next round of "staff- initiated" Comprehensive Plan amendments following PUD approval. For a complete listing of adjacent uses, land -use designations and zoning districts, see Table 1 below. Table 2 on page four (4) examines how consistent the proposed project is with the City Code and future land -use designation for the site. Subject Property: I Planned Development Area I Residential Low Benjamin High School North I Planned Development Area I Residential Low Vacant South Planned Unit Development Residential Low San Michele Underlying Zoning RL -3 West Planned Development Area Residential Low Vacant East Public /Institutional/ Public Dwyer High School/ Planned Development Area Residential High Vacant E City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 20, 2000 Petition PUD -00 -01 C. Concurrency The petitioner received concurrency certification on April 28, 2000 for traffic, drainage, water and sewer. Traffic concurrency is certified until the buildout date indicated in the Traffic Impact Analysis, which is December 31, 2004. Should the square footage indicated in the TIA not be constructed by such time , then the petitioner must undergo an additional concurrency review prior to construction. Concurrency has been certified with no conditions. D. Development Review Committee The Development Review Committee members, representing public and private agencies affected by the proposed development, reviewed this petition on June 22, 2000. A listing of various departmental comments is attached. The applicant has submitted revised plans and other documents in response to DRC comments. E. Procedure This is a request to rezone to Planned Unit Development. The request is reviewed by City Staff and the Development Review Committee, who forward comments and recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Acting in an advisory role, the Commission considers the recommendations of the DRC and City Staff and makes a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council reviews the request for, and makes a final determination of approval, approval with conditions, or denial. III. PROJECT DETAILS A. Site Location and Existing Conditions The proposed project is located on a 50 -acre tract of land on the western side of Central Boulevard, approximately Y2 mile north of Hood Road. The tract is presently heavily wooded, consisting primarily of Upland Pine Woodland System. This consists primarily of slash pine tree story and saw palmetto understory. There is also a small wetland located on the eastern side property, adjacent to Central Boulevard. To the north, south and west are vacant lands. To the east, across Central Boulevard, are a vacant tract and the William T. Dwyer Public High School. To the south is vacant land, which has recently received development approval for the San Michele residential community, consisting of 90 single family homes. This land was owned by the MacArthur Foundation , was part of the sell -off to WCI, and is subject to the stipulations set forth in the Forbearance Agreement. The Benjamin School now owns the property. The petitioner is proposing a 187,671 square foot educational facility which will include classrooms, a performing arts facility, administrative and media centers, 3 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 20, 2000 Petition PUD -00-01 physical education facilities, food service facilities, field house facility, a soccer /track field, softball field, baseball field, football field and four tennis courts. B. Compliance with Land Development Regulations, Section 76 Site = Public /institutional Minimum Building Site Area = 2 2,178,000 sq. feet Y Yes 15,000 sf Minimum Site Width= 9 900 feet Y Yes 100 feet Maximum Building Lot 9 9% Y Yes Coverage 40% Maximum Building Height = 5 53 feet N No 45 feet Front Setback = 1 155 feet Y Yes 25 feet Side Setback = 2 200 feet Y Yes 15 feet Side Setback Facing a Street = 1 128 feet Y Yes 15 feet Rear 15 feetck = I 202 feet I Yes I C. Waiver Requests The petitioner is requesting waivers from the following code requirements: • Section 76, to allow for a 53 foot high structure to exceed code requirement by 8 feet. • Section 256, to allow for a sidewalk on only one side of the "Conceptual Thoroughfare Road ". • Section 180 (3) Number of Parking Spaces in excess of 10% required parking. • Section 282, Lake Maintenance Tract, to allow for vertical structures within the required lake maintenance easement. Justification: See attachment. 4 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 20, 2000 Petition PUD -00-01 D. Proposed Building The property is intended to be developed as a 50 -acre private high school campus which will include 69,846 square feet of classrooms, 30,305 square feet of performing arts facilities, 18,362 square feet of administrative and media center facilities, 39,247 square feet of physical education facilities, 11,225 square feet of food service facilities, 18,684 square feet in field house facilities, one soccer /track field; one softball field; one baseball field; a soccer /football field; and four tennis courts. Approximately 490 students are expected to attend the private high school. The performing arts facility has a seating capacity of 490 seats. The performing arts facility and the athletic field will not be used simultaneously or during school hours. The high school is designed in a contemporary style featuring stucco buildings with towers and flat concrete tile roofs. The roof styles include mansard and hip. All rooftop equipment will be screened. The color scheme of the buildings will be peach and white. The school facilities will be one and two stories in height. The gymnasium and performing arts center will be greater in height. Art in Public Places The petitioner has been informed of the "Art in Public Places" program, should the cost of development exceed $1,000,000. The petitioner has indicated that they would like to designate an area on the site plan for an "Art in Public Places" location. The petitioner shall provide a note on the site plan indicating that exact location is to be determined in conjunction with the Art Advisory Board, after City Council approval. E. Siqnaqe The petitioner is proposing to bring back a sign package for review and approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council at a later date. F. Landscaping and Buffering Section 102 of the Code of Ordinances requires a 25% preservation of all upland native communities located on site. Environmental consultant Jim Schnelle has determined that this required preservation area equivalent to 7.92 acres (memo dated November 18, 1999). The petitioner shall be providing 7.92 acres of preserved upland native community. In addition to the upland community preservation, the petitioner is proposing to preserve an existing wetland area. 41 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 20, 2000 Petition PUD -00-01 The petitioner shall be providing a total of 83,853 landscaping points. The landscape code requires 72,048.2 points of landscaping. The proposed development provides for a surplus of 11,804.8 points of landscaping. Of the 83,538 points provided, 52,900 points, or 63.3 %, are provided by existing vegetation preserved as upland native community and wetland. The petitioner has been notified that they will be required to provide littoral zone plantings. The City Forester has requested that the petitioner refrain from identifying littoral zone plantings and cross sections at this time, as these requirements are subject to change in the near future. Staff shall provide the petitioner with direction on how to meet the code requirements for littoral planting zones prior to City Council approval. Central Boulevard Parkway The proposed development is located along the Central Boulevard Parkway, as defined in Section 106 of the LDRs. This section requires that the developer preserve a 90 foot "parkway easement" of upland native system within the subject site, adjacent to the Central Boulevard right -of -way. Within the parkway shall be a six or twelve foot multi- use pathway shall be provided , pedestrian path, landscape medians, linear parks, greenbelts and landscaping buffers. The petitioner has provided for the 90 foot parkway easement, consisting of upland native system and meandering six foot multi - pathway system. The petitioner has also provided for landscaping within the median and road shoulder, consistent with the upland native community system theme as specified in Section 106 of the LDRs, titled "Parkways ". G. Parking Based on the revised LDRs Section 180 specifies that High Schools provide one space per classroom, plus one space per 250 square feet of office plus one space for every three students. The petitioner is proposing approximately 50 classrooms, 18,364 square feet of office space and 490 students. This would equate to approximately 288 parking spaces required. The petitioner is proposing 328 parking spaces. These spaces shall be located in two areas, adjacent to the administrative and academic buildings, and adjacent to the field house and athletic facilities. The total number of spaces provided is approximately 13.8% above code requirement. The excess parking is being provided for "visitor" parking. The petitioner is requesting a waiver for exceeding more than 10% of the number of spaces per code requirement (see attached waiver justification). 6 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 20, 2000 Petition PUD -00-01 H. Site Access and Circulation The petitioner is proposing three entrances, two of which shall connect to a roadway, to be constructed by the petitioner, which will run perpendicular to Central Boulevard. This yet to be named roadway is a segment of the Conceptual Thoroughfare Plan. This roadway will eventually run from Donald Ross Road to Alternate A1A, as specified in the Comprehensive Plan. A third entrance shall connect to Central Boulevard. This entrance will have controlled access, and will connect the parking area adjacent to the field house and sports complex. The petitioner will be providing a 6' foot multi -use pathway along Central Boulevard as well as a 5 foot meandering sidewalk along the future east -west road. This will be part of an overall pedestrian /bike system, which will tie in to an overall Citywide system. I. Drainage Drainage concurrency has been approved. Legal positive outfall from this site will be from the northern end of the site, into a Northern Palm Beach County improvement District Canal. The conceptual drainage plan indicates that there will be three retention facilities on site. The water feature in front of the academic campus will accommodate runoff from the proposed roadway (Conceptual Thoroughfare Plan Roadway) and from the parking and drive areas in front of the campus. The wetland will receive runoff from the academic campus area and back portions of the main parking lot. The retention pond in the rear of the property will receive runoff from the academic facilities and the front water feature. Outfall from the site will run from the rear retention pond to the Northern canal along the northern boundary of the site. This development shall be subject to the Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District Unit 2 condition of approval. J. Lighting The petitioner is proposing parking lot lighting throughout the c a petitioner is proposing stadium lighting for the athletic playing fields. submitted a lighting plan, which indicates that the highest footcandle future residential property (to the west) is 0.45. Additional shielding on be required once future residential development is initiated. J. Leqal Non - Conformities There are no legal non - conformities on site. 7 mpus area. The The petitioner has reading bordering light fixtures may City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 20, 2000 Petition PUD -00-01 K. Platting The petitioner is proposing to plat and record this parcel, consistent with the approved site and master PUD plan, prior to the issuance of the first building permit. L. Phasing The petitioner has indicated that the development will be constructed in one phase. IV. COMMENTS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC) This petition has received DRC certification. DRC certification indicates that all major outstanding issues have been resolved. Planninq and Zoninq Division Staff is not supporting a waiver from Section 256 of the LDRs entitled "Sidewalks ". Staff is not supporting this waiver based on concerns that this will create a "missing link" once development to the west occurs. To ensure that the western developments will have a continuous link to Central Boulevard Parkway system, staff considers this sidewalk segment to be essential. Therefore, this segment should be completed at this time. Staff has recommended that the petitioner provide irrigation and electrical service to the Central Boulevard medians as part of the City's Citywide Median Improvement Program. This program envisions upgrading the existing Native Upland Community System to include irrigated annuals, flowering species and lighting. The petitioner has indicated that they must "jack and bore" a conduit under Central Boulevard at the northern end of the site in order to extend water and sewer lines from the existing main. Staff is requiring that the petitioner add irrigation and electrical service to the Central Boulevard medians via this conduit and an "open cut" conduit connecting the north and south medians. Also as part of the overall City beautification program, staff is requiring that the petitioner utilize either a paver block system or a "bowmanite" pressed concrete system to delineate the crosswalk at the new "Conceptual Thoroughfare Plan Road ". The petitioner should carry out this construction as part of the overall new construction of this roadway. See Public Works Comments 0 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 20, 2000 Petition PUD -00 -01 City Forester The City Forester has reviewed this project and has made his recommendations on conditions of approval regarding littoral plant requirements, Central Boulevard Parkway plantings, and removal of exotics (memo dated July 17, 2000). The petitioner has responded to the other comments made by the City Forester. They have also revised landscape plans in response to comments made by the Planning and Zoning Commission at the August 8, 2000 workshop. The City Forester has reviewed the revised plans and has no outstanding concerns. City Engineer The petitioner has addressed the City Engineer's concerns by revising the site plans accordingly. The City Engineer shall review and comment on the revisions prior to Planning and Zoning public hearing. The City Engineer's office has reviewed the revised plans and has indicated that all major outstanding concerns have been addressed. The petitioner shall, however, provide for a letter from NPBCID that verifies the release of all ties /or holdings for the southern lake. Buildinq Division No concerns at this time (transmittal dated June 8, 2000) Public Works Jon Iles, Public Works Supervisor, has submitted a memo addressing the Citywide Median Planting Plan and beautification program. These issues are being worked out with the petitioner (memo dated June 12, 2000) This concern is being addressed through Condition of Approval #1. Police Department The Department has submitted their Public Safety Recommendation Matrix. The petitioner has responded to the concerns of the Department in their July 5, 2000 memo (Police memo dated June 20, 2000) 9 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 20, 2000 Petition PUD -00 -01 Fire Department The Site Plan and building elements meet Fire Rescue access standards (memo dated July 12, 2000). Seacoast Utilities Seacoast has reviewed the latest revisions and has made additional comments. Seacoast has identified a conflict between a water main and an exfiltration ditch. The have also identified a conflict between the existing Central Boulevard storm drain and the proposed sanitary sewer line running parallel to Central Boulevard. Seacoast has reviewed the revised plans and has indicated that all their outstanding concerns have been addressed. (Memo dated September 25, 2000) Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District No concerns at this time (memo dated June 13, 2000). V. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION On August 28, 2000 the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on this petition. The Commission voted 7 -0 to recommend approval of this petition to City Council. The Commission also recommended approval of all four waivers requested by the petitioner by a 6 -1 vote. The Commission recommended approval with fourteen conditions, seven of which have been addressed by the petitioner. VI. RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL Staff recommends approval of petition PUD -00 -01 with the following waivers from LDR requirements: • Section 76, to allow for a 53 foot high structure to exceed code requirement by 8 feet. • Section 180 (3) Number of Parking Spaces in excess of 10% required parking. • Section 282, Lake Maintenance Tract, to allow for vertical construction within a Lake Maintenance Easement. Staff also recommends approval of petition PUD -00 -01 with the following conditions of 10 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 20, 2000 Petition PUD -00 -01 approval: (1) Prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant, successors or assigns shall install and maintain in perpetuity, the Parkway System, including landscaping, irrigation, lighting and related amenities to City specifications per the citywide streetscaping beautification program, in the road shoulders and median within the right -of -way, along Central Boulevard and the future East -West Roadway. The developer of the undeveloped residential property along the east side of Central Boulevard, directly across from the subject site, shall, at the time of development order, begin to contribute Y2 of the maintenance costs of landscaping installed by subject petitioner, adjacent to their property. In the event a Special Parkway District is formed by the City of Palm Beach Gardens, or another entity, pertaining to the roadway maintenance around this project, the property owner, or its successors, shall immediately become a member of said District. The exact location of irrigation lines and electrical sleeving shall be determined at time of construction plan approval. (2) Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, all exotic vegetation shall be removed from the site. (3) Prior to site plan approval, the applicant must submit a letter from Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District (NPBCID) that verifies the release of all ties /holdings that NPBCID has or plans to have in the future with the lakes on the Benjamin School site. Therefore, all lakes will be required to remain privately owned and maintained. (4) No building permits except for the clearing of exotic vegetation shall be issued until a revised Surface Water Management System for Unit 2 has received final approval from the City of Palm Beach Gardens and all other applicable governments and agencies, including a schedule for implementing the plan and a definitive commitment for funding from the required improvements. (5) The build -out date of this project is December 31, 2004 as referenced in their March 10, 1999 traffic impact analysis. For the purposes of this condition, the project shall be considered built -out if the student enrollment has reached the level as indicated in the traffic impact analysis, or 50% of square footage approved by this ordinance is completed. Enrollment shall be verified by City Staff prior to the build -out date. (Planning and Zoning) 11 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 20, 2000 Petition PUD -00 -01 (6) Prior to the issuance of the permit for site drainage, the City shall review and approve construction details for littoral zones, including their location, slopes and vegetation. As a requirement, at least 50% of the shoreline shall be planted with wetland trees and /or aquatic plants at ten square feet of littoral zone for every one linear feet of shoreline. There shall be a minimum of one tree for every 80 square feet and plants shall be on three -foot centers, minimum. A sum total of area(s) constituting no less than 15% nor more than 25% of the total shoreline distance shall be constructed as littoral shelf at the ratio of 10 square feet of shelf per running foot of shoreline. (7) Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall submit the Property Owners Association documents to the City for review by the City's legal counsel and the City Forester. The open space /landscape maintenance and environmental preserve management plan will also have to be found sufficient by the City Forester prior to final approval of construction drawings or commencement of land alteration. The City shall review the POA documents for maintenance and management language that meets or exceeds the City's guidelines included in the City's Landscape Handbook and City Codes. Staff is recommending denial of the following waiver request: • Section 256, entitled "sidewalks" which requires both sides of roadways to have a minimum five foot wide sidewalk. The applicant is requesting to build a sidewalk only on the north side of the east -west road. 12 Ordinance 30, 2000 Date Prepared: September 28, 2000 ORDINANCE 30, 2000 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION OF THE BENJAMIN PRIVATE SCHOOL, INC., FOR REZONING OF 50 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF CENTRAL BOULEVARD AND AN UNNAMED FUTURE EAST -WEST ROAD AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA (PDA) TO PUBLIC /INSTITUTIONAL (P /1) WITH A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) OVERLAY, IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A 187,671 SQUARE FOOT PRIVATE HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS; PROVIDING FOR WAIVERS; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Palm Beach Gardens received an application from The Benjamin Private School, Inc., for approval of rezoning of 50 acres of land located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Central Boulevard and unnamed future east -west road from Planned Development Area (PDA) to Public /Institutional (P /1) with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application and determined that it is sufficient; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application and determined that it is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has recommended approval of the planned unit development (PUD) known as "The Benjamin Private Upper School "; and WHEREAS, the City's Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed said application and recommended that it be approved with the requested waivers and subject to certain conditions. Ordinance 30, 2000 Date Prepared: September 28, 2000 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida hereby rezones 50 acres of land owned by The Benjamin School, Inc., located at the northwest corner of the intersection of Central Boulevard and unnamed future road, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, from Planned Development Area (PDA) to Public /Institutional (P /1) with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay, in order to allow the construction of a 187,671 square foot private high school campus. The PUD will be known as "The Benjamin Private Upper School." SECTION 2. Said Planned Unit Development is approved subject to the following conditions which shall be the responsibility of the applicant, its successors or assigns: (1) Prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant, successors or assigns shall install and maintain in perpetuity, the Parkway System, including landscaping, irrigation, lighting and related amenities to City specifications per the citywide streetscaping beautification program, in the road shoulders and median within the right -of -way, along Central Boulevard and the future East -West Roadway. The developer of the undeveloped residential property along the east side of Central Boulevard, directly across from the subject site, shall, at the time of development order, begin to contribute Y2 of the maintenance costs of landscaping installed by subject petitioner, adjacent to their property. In the event a Special Parkway District is formed by the City of Palm Beach Gardens, or another entity, pertaining to the roadway maintenance around this project, the property owner, or its successors, shall immediately become a member of said District. The exact location of irrigation lines and electrical sleeving shall be determined at time of construction plan approval. (Planning and Zoning) (2) Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy, all exotic vegetation shall be removed from the site. (Planning and Zoning) (3) Prior to site plan approval, the applicant must submit a letter from Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District (NPBCID) that verifies the release of all ties /holdings that NPBCID has or plans to 2 Ordinance 30, 2000 Date Prepared: September 28, 2000 have in the future with the lakes on the Benjamin School site. Therefore, all lakes will be required to remain privately owned and maintained. (Planning and Zoning) (4) No building permits except for the clearing of exotic vegetation shall be issued until a revised Surface Water Management System for Unit 2 has received final approval from the City of Palm Beach Gardens and all other applicable governments and agencies, including a schedule for implementing the plan and a definitive commitment for funding from the required improvements. (Planning and Zoning) (5) The build -out date of this project is December 31, 2004 as referenced in their March 10, 1999 traffic impact analysis. For the purposes of this condition, the project shall be considered built -out if the student enrollment has reached the level as indicated in the traffic impact analysis, or 50% of square footage approved by this ordinance is completed. Enrollment shall be verified by City Staff prior to the build -out date. (Planning and Zoning) (6) Prior to the issuance of the permit for site drainage, the City shall review and approve construction details for littoral zones, including their location, slopes and vegetation. As a requirement, at least 50% of the shoreline shall be planted with wetland trees and /or aquatic plants at ten square feet of littoral zone for every one linear feet of shoreline. There shall be a minimum of one tree for every 80 square feet and plants shall be on three -foot centers, minimum. A sum total of area(s) constituting no less than 15% nor more than 25% of the total shoreline distance shall be constructed as littoral shelf at the ratio of 10 square feet of shelf per running foot of shoreline. (Planning and Zoning, Engineering) (7) Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall submit the Property Owners Association documents to the City for review by the City's legal counsel and the City Forester. The open space /landscape maintenance and environmental preserve management plan will also have to be found sufficient by the City Forester prior to final approval of construction drawings or commencement of land alteration. The City shall review the POA documents for maintenance and management language that meets or exceeds the City's guidelines included in the City's Landscape Handbook and City Codes. 3 Ordinance 30, 2000 Date Prepared: September 28, 2000 SECTION 3. The following waivers are hereby granted with this approval: • Section 76, to allow for a 53 foot high structure to exceed code requirement by 8 feet. • Section 180 (3), Number of Parking Spaces in excess of 10% required parking. • Section 282, Lake Maintenance Tract, to allow for vertical structures within the 25 foot Lake Maintenance Easement. SECTION 4. Construction of the Planned Unit Development shall be in compliance with the following plans on file with the City's Growth Management Department: 1. October 3, 2000 Master Site Plan, Urban Design Studio, Sheets SP -1 through SP -3. 2. September 7, 2000 Engineering and Landscape Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet. 3. October 3, 2000 Landscape Plans, Urban Design Studio, Sheets 1 through 6. 4. September 8, 2000 Plant List and Detail Sheet, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet. 5. September 7, 2000 PUD Parkway Plan, Urban Design Studio, 12 Sheets. 6. April 5, 2000 Architectural Elevations and Plans, Schwab, Twitty and Hanser, Sheets A -1.1.1 through A -3.1.3 and A- 3.1.5. 7. August 9, 2000 Architectural Elevations, Schwab, Twitty and Hanser, Sheet A- 3.1.4. 8. July 6, 2000 Sports Complex Lighting Design, Hubbell Lighting, 1 Sheet 9. October 2, 2000 Photometric Plan, AGI , 1 Sheet 10. October 6, 2000 Conceptual Drainage Plan, Scheaffer and Fagan, 2 Sheets. 11. April 13, 2000 Boundary and Topographic Survey, Benchmark Surveying, 2 Sheets. 12. March 10, 1999 Traffic Impact Analysis, Kimley — Horn Associates, 17 pages 13. March, 1999 Environmental Assessment, E.W. Consultants, 16 4 Ordinance 30, 2000 Date Prepared: September 28, 2000 pages. SECTION 5. If any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holding shall not affect the remainder of the Ordinance. SECTION 6. All ordinances or parts of ordinances of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, which are in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 7. This Ordinance shall be effective upon adoption. PLACED ON FIRST READING THE 19' DAY OF OCTOBER 2000. PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS DAY OF 200_. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 200_. MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO VICE MAYOR ERIC JABLIN COUNCILWOMAN LAUREN FURTADO COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK COUNCILMAN CARL SABATELLO ATTEST BY: CAROL GOLD INTERIM CITY CLERK h Ordinance 30, 2000 Date Prepared: September 28, 2000 APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY BY: CITY ATTORNEY VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR JABLIN COUNCILWOMAN FURTADO COUNCILMAN CLARK COUNCILMAN SABATELLO \ \FILE_SRV\COMPROG \Short Range \pud0001or1.doc [.1 C CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 16, 2000 SUBJECT /AGENDA ITEM First Reading: Ordinance 32, 2000, a request to amend and expand the previously approved St. Mark's Church and School Planned Unit Development (PUD). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 32, 2000, which contains conditions of approval. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ Total Council Action: City Attorney Growt Management [ ] Approved Finance NA $ [ ] Approved w/ Current FY conditions ACM [ ] Denied Human Res. NA Advertised: Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Other NA Date: [ ] Operating Attachments: Paper: [X] Not Required [ ]Other • Ordinance 32, 2000 Y Affected parties Budget Acct. #:: Director [ ] Notified [ ] None Approved by: City Manager [X] Not required REQUEST / Fanning /Howey Associates, Inc., agent for St. Mark's Church, Inc., is requesting a planned unit development amendment to expand the previously approved St. Mark's Playing Fields PUD to include the St. Mark's Church and School site on the east side of Gardens East Drive, add an additional school building of approximately 14,000 square feet in size, and expand the church building by 945 square feet. This petition also includes a time extension for the portable trailer on the eastern section of the site that is City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 16, 2000 Petition PUD -00 -02 to be removed after the construction of the school addition. The 11 -acre site is located on the northeast and northwest corners of Burns Road and Gardens East Drive. (7- 42S -43E) BACKGROUND St. Mark's Episcopal Church and School, on the northeast corner of Burns Road and Gardens East Drive, was approved on March 19, 1992 with Resolution 21, 1992. The private school playing fields on the northwest corner of Burns Road and Gardens East Drive, includes an a structure with an open -air pavilion for physical education, concession booth, restrooms, custodian room, storage area, and a room for use by the physical education teacher. On July 1, 1993, a conditional use for a temporary classroom trailer was approved with the passage of Resolution 71, 1993 (see attached). Because of a poorly written resolution, it is unclear if the temporary use of the trailer was to expire in July of 1994 or 1995; nonetheless the temporary classroom trailer was never removed. Resolution 119, 1994 (see attached) confused matters further with condition #6: "No time extension shall be granted for the use of the portable classroom structure on the site as approved by Resolution 71, 1993, until July 31, 1999. After July 31, 1999 the applicant submitted a time extension application for the temporary classroom trailer (which should have been removed at least 4 years prior). The time extension petition was subsequently withdrawn, and the request for the time extension for the temporary classroom trailer was incorporated into this petition. The applicant wishes to remove the trailer when the additional classroom building is completed, or after two (2) years of the approval date, which ever occurs first. The northwest corner was approved as a PUD on June 3, 1999 with Ordinance 24, 1999. The subject property is bound to the north by The Oaks (residential and ROS — Recreation Open Space) and Catalina Lakes (residential). To the west of the site is the Catalina Lakes townhome project. To the south is Gardens East Apartments (residential), Cedar Gardens Office (9,867 square feet of PO - professional office), and Palm Beach Gardens Medical Center (hospital). To the east of the site is Plaza North Medical Centre (a medical office building). LAND USE & ZONING The western section of the subject site is zoned Residential — Medium Density (RM) with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay, has a future land -use designation of Residential — Medium (RM), and is listed as Residential — High (RH) on the Vision Plan. The eastern section of the subject site is zoned Residential — Low Density 3 (RL -3), has a future land -use designation of Residential — Low (RL), and is listed as Professional Office (PO) on the Vision Plan. For a complete listing of adjacent uses, land -use 2 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 16, 2000 Petition PUD -00-02 designations and zoning districts, see Table 1 on page four (4). Table 2 on page five (5) examines how consistent the proposed project is with the City Code and future land - use designation for the site. The following is the key for Table 1 and Table 2: PUD overlay = Planned Unit Development overlay PCD = Planned Community District RL -3 = Residential — Low Density 3 RL = Residential — Low Density RM = Residential — Medium Density PO = Professional Office P = Public CU = Conditional Use CONCURRENCY The proposed project received concurrency certification on August 17, 2000, which included concurrency for traffic, drainage, solid waste, sewer and water. PROCEDURE This is a request to amend and expand a PUD. The request is reviewed by City Staff and the Development Review Committee, who forward comments and recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Acting in an advisory role, the Commission considers the recommendations of the DRC and City Staff and makes a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council reviews the request for amending and expanding the PUD, and makes a final determination of approval, approval with conditions, or denial. PROJECT DETAILS Buildinq Site The 11 -acre site is located on the northeast (4.9 acres) and northwest (6.1 acres) corners of Burns Road and Gardens East Drive. The northwest corner is the site of the playing fields, multipurpose courts, and the ancillary building /pavilion. The northeast corner contains the church and school. The applicant wishes to add an additional school building (approximately 14,000 square feet in size) and expand the church building by 945 square feet; these additions will occur on the eastern section of the site. The school addition would enable the school to increase in size from 490 students to 570 students (from pre - kindergarten through eighth grade). It should be noted, 3 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 16, 2000 Petition PUD -00-02 . ......... __.__. _.__._ ..... - , 1 ,,, ,,, . _ ..... 1 Subject Property West = Playing Fields RM w/ PUD overlay RM East = Church & School RL -3 with CU for church RL and school North Catalina Lakes RM w/ PUD overlay RM The Oaks RM w/ PUD overlay RL South Cedar Gardens Office PO PO Gardens East Apartments PCD with RM underlying RM zoning Palm Beach Gardens PO w/ PUD overlay P Medical Center West Catalina Lakes RM w/ PUD overlay RM East Plaza North Medical PO with CU for clinic and PO Centre sale of artificial limbs 4 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 16, 2000 Petition PUD -00 -02 z 0 Proposed ,Plan 0 istenfi? ,...,., ,. , ,., ,� y,,, :: City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 16, 2000 Petition PUD -00 -02 however, that condition #1 of Resolution 119, 1994 limited the maximum number of students to 460. Site Access Access to both quadrants of the site occurs along Gardens East Drive. Signage The site has two (2) existing ground signs; one sign is on the western section of the site (playing fields) and the other sign is located on the eastern section of the site (church and school). Phasinq The phasing schedule for this petition incorporates the construction of the recently approved playing fields, multipurpose courts, and ancillary building to be located on the western section of the site; this part of the phasing makes up phases 1 and 2. Phase 3 will contain the building of the 14,000 square -foot classroom, and phase 4 will contain the 945 square -foot church addition. The build -out date for this project is the fall of 2001. Waivers The applicant is requesting a waiver for exceeding the required parking by more than 10 %. The applicant is also requesting a waiver for the proposed 8 -foot rear setback when code requires 10 feet. The rear setback waiver was a result of the Planning and Zoning Commission's request for more articulation along the north elevation of the proposed school building addition. Legal Nonconformities The front setback on the eastern section of the site is only 13 feet (code requires 25 feet), however, this is an existing building (the church sanctuary). COMMENTS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC) Planning & Zoninq Division The Planning and Zoning Staff have stated that the entire site will have to be platted prior to the issuance of a building permit, the school will not be able to have more than 570 students, and the temporary classroom trailer shall be removed from the site within two (2) years of the adoption of the ordinance for this petition, or when the 14,000 square -foot classroom building receives its final certificate of occupancy, which ever occurs first. 6 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 16, 2000 Petition PUD -00-02 City Forester Mark Hendrickson stated in his October 4, 2000 memorandum that the following condition of approval should be included in the approval for the proposed project: • The applicant shall maintain the Gardens East Drive landscaping from their east campus to their western recreational property from the north boundary to Burns Road. City Engineering City Engineer Sean Donahue stated in a memorandum dated October 5, 2000 (see attached) that prior to construction plan approval, the applicant shall certify that this project meets the SFWMD water quality requirements. Public Works Jonathan Iles reviewed this petition and has submitted comments (see attached). Mr. Iles' comments reflect the same comment City Forester Mark Hendrickson made regarding the maintenance of the road shoulders along Gardens East Drive abutting the site. To date, no objections have been received from the following departments and agencies: Building Division, Fire Department, Police Department, Parks & Recreation Department, City Legal, Seacoast Utility Authority, Palm Beach County School District, Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District, South Florida Water Management District, Waste Management, and Florida Power & Light. OUTSTANDING ISSUES To date, there are no major outstanding issues regarding this petition. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION The Planning and Zoning Commission heard this petition as a workshop on August 22, 2000. The Commission had the following comments: 1. The architecture is too plain and utilitarian; elevations should be revised. 2. The code numbers in the key identifying the colors and materials for sheets A3.1 and A3.2 are incorrect and need to be revised. 3. Pictures of the existing buildings need to be provided. 4. The downspouts should be removed and replaced with interior roofers. 5. More foundation landscaping should be provided. 6. The arch and gable entry feature is odd and should be reworked. rl City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 16, 2000 Petition PUD -00-02 7. More information regarding the walkways should be provided. 8. A condition limiting the maximum number of students to 570 should be included in any approval for this petition. The applicant responded to these comments be submitting revised color renderings and a photographic survey of the existing site. These items were given to the Planning and Zoning Commission members at their September 26, 2000 meeting. Because Commissioner Craig Kunkle would be unable to attend the October 10, 2000 meeting, he faxed his comments regarding the revised rendering and photographic survey to the Planning and Zoning Division (see attached). Mr. Kunkle stated that the hedge material planted on the inside of the fence should be relocated to the outside of the fence, and should extend the full length of the fence. However, Staff does not support this because the hedge would then be in City owned land, and the City would be required to maintain the hedge. Mr. Kunkle also stated that the completion date for the parking lot next to the playing fields should be agreed upon. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard this petition as a second workshop on August 8, 2000. The Commission recommended approval of petition PUD -00 -02 with Staff's recommendations and the 2 waivers needed by the applicant. The Commission also wanted more articulation along the north and west elevations of the school addition, so that the addition more closely resembles the existing buildings on the site. Finally, the Commission wanted the downspouts on the north elevation of the school addition to be removed. The applicant has satisfactorily addressed all the comments raised by the Planning and Zoning Commission, including the architectural revisions on the north and west elevations of the school addition. RECOMMENDATION Based on the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission, Staff recommends approval of SP -00 -06 with the following conditions: 1. Prior to construction plan approval, the applicant shall certify that this project meets the SFWMD water quality requirements. (City Engineer) 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the entire site shall be platted. (City Engineering) 3. The school shall not have more than 570 students. (Code Enforcement) 4. The temporary classroom trailer shall be removed from the site within two (2) years of the adoption of this ordinance or when the 14,000 square -foot classroom building 8 City Council Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 16, 2000 Petition PUD -00 -02 receives its final certificate of occupancy, which ever occurs first. (Planning & Zoning) 5. The applicant shall maintain the Gardens East Drive landscaping from its east campus to its western recreational property from the north boundary to Burns Road. (City Forester) 6. The buildout date for this project (including the playing fields and parking lot on the west side of Gardens East Drive) is December 31, 2001. (Planning & Zoning) And approval of the following waivers: 1. Maximum amount of on -site parking to equal or exceed 110% of required parking — Section 180(d)(1), which requires that the amount of parking on -site does not exceed 10% of the required parking for the site, to allow for parking on -site to exceed the required amount by 27.6 %. 2. Minimum rear setback — Section 71(c) and Section 75, which require a minimum rear setback of 10 feet, to allow for an 8 -foot rear setback. g /john: pud0002.cc /jl 9 October 16, 2000 ORDINANCE 32, 2000 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF AN APPLICATION FROM ST. MARK'S CHURCH, INC. FOR AN AMENDMENT AND EXPANSION OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BY APPROVING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 14,000 SQUARE -FOOT SCHOOL BUILDING, A 945 SQUARE -FOOT CHURCH ADDITION, AND A TWO (2) YEAR TIME EXTENSION FOR A TRAILER ON AN 11 ACRE SITE, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST CORNERS OF BURNS ROAD AND GARDENS EAST DRIVE, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; PROVIDING FOR WAIVERS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Palm Beach Gardens received an application from St. Mark's Church, Inc. for approval of an amendment to a planned unit development located at the northeast and northwest corners of Burns Road and Gardens East Drive, in order to construct a 14,000 square -foot school building, a 945 square -foot church addition, and permit a two (2) year time extension for a trailer on the 11 -acre site, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto; and WHEREAS, the 11 -acre "St. Mark's Church and School" site is currently zoned RL -3 - Residential Low Density District on the eastern section of the site, and RM — Residential Medium Density District on the western section of the site; and WHEREAS, the applicant is requesting that the Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay currently located on the eastern section of the site be extended to incorporate the western section of the site (the area at the northwest corner of Burns Road and Gardens East Drive); and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application and determined that it is sufficient; and WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application and determined that it is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations; and 10 Ordinance 32, 2000 Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 16, 2000 Petition PUD -00-02 WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has recommended approval of the amendment to the planned unit development (PUD) known as the "St. Mark's Church and School "; and WHEREAS, the City's Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed said application and recommended that it be approved with the requested waivers and subject to certain conditions stated herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida hereby approves an amendment to the "St. Mark's Church and School" PUD at the northeast and northwest corners of Burns Road and Gardens East Drive, as more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, to permit the construction of a 14,000 square -foot school building, the construction of a 945 square -foot church addition, and the approval of a two (2) year time extension for a trailer (on the northeast corner of Burns Road). SECTION 2. Said Planned Unit Development is approved subject to the following conditions, which shall be the responsibility of the applicant, its successors or assigns: 1. Prior to construction plan approval, the applicant shall certify that this project meets the SFWMD water quality requirements. (City Engineer) 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the entire site shall be platted. (City Engineering) 3. The school shall not have more than 570 students. (Code Enforcement) 4. The temporary classroom trailer shall be removed from the site within two (2) years of the adoption of this ordinance or when the 14,000 square -foot classroom building receives its final certificate of occupancy, which ever occurs first. (Planning & Zoning) 5. The applicant shall maintain the Gardens East Drive landscaping from its east campus to its western recreational property from the north boundary to Burns Road. (City Forester) 6. The buildout date for this project (including the playing fields and parking lot on the west side of Gardens East Drive) is December 31, 2001. (Planning & Zoning) 11 Ordinance 32, 2000 Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 16, 2000 Petition PUD -00-02 SECTION 3. The following waivers are hereby granted with this approval: 1. Maximum amount of on -site parking to equal or exceed 110% of required parking — Section 180(d)(1), which requires that the amount of parking on -site does not exceed 10% of the required parking for the site, to allow for parking on -site to exceed the required amount by 27.6 %. 2. Minimum rear setback — Section 71(c) and Section 75, which require a minimum rear setback of 10 feet, to allow for a 7 -foot rear setback. SECTION 4. Construction of the Planned Unit Development shall be in compliance with the following plans on file with the City's Growth Management Department: Exhibits (dates represent date received and stamped in): 1. October 20, 2000 Index/Abbreviations, Fanning /Howey Associates, Inc., Sheet T1.2 (1 sheet total). 2. October 20, 2000 Master Site Plan, Fanning /Howey Associates, Inc., Sheet G1.1 (1 sheet total). 3. October 20, 2000 Phased Site Plans, Fanning /Howey Associates, Inc., Sheet G1.2 (1 sheet total). 4. October 20, 2000 Phase 3 — Site Plan, Fanning /Howey Associates, Inc., Sheet G1.3 (1 sheet total). 5. October 20, 2000 Floor Plan — 1 st Floor, Fanning /Howey Associates, Inc., Sheet Al. 1 (1 sheet total). 6. October 20, 2000 Floor Plan — 2 "d Floor, Fanning /Howey Associates, Inc., Sheet A1.2 (1 sheet total). 7. May 31, 2000 Roof Plan, Fanning/HoweyAssociates, Inc., Sheet A2.1 (1 sheet total). 8. October 20, 2000 North & South Elevations, Fanning /Howey Associates, Inc., Sheet A3.1 (1 sheet total). 9. October 20, 2000 East & West Elevations, Fanning /Howey Associates, Inc., Sheet A3.2 (1 sheet total). 10. October 20, 2000 Section 1, Fanning /Howey Associates, Inc., Sheet A4.1 (1 sheet total). 11. October 20, 2000 Phase #3 /Building #9 Landscape Plan, Roy— Fisher Associates, Inc., (1 sheet total). 12. October 20, 2000 Landscape Details & Notes, Roy — Fisher Associates, Inc., (1 sheet total). 12 Ordinance 32,2000 Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 16, 2000 Petition PUD -00 -02 13. July 19, 2000 Sketch of Boundary Survey, Lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc., Sheet A375 (1 sheet total). 14. September 22, 2000 Sketch of Boundary Survey, Lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc., Sheet A502 (1 sheet total). SECTION 5. The approval expressly incorporates and is contingent upon all representations made by the applicant or applicant's agents at any workshop or public hearing. SECTION 6. If any section, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or word of this Ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holding shall not affect the remainder of the Ordinance. SECTION 7. All ordinances or parts of ordinances of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, which are in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed. SECTION 8. This Ordinance shall be effective upon adoption. PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS 2nd DAY OF NOVEMBER 2000. PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS DAY OF 2000. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF 2000. MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO VICE MAYOR ERIC JABLIN COUNCILWOMAN LAUREN FURTADO COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK COUNCILMAN CARL SABATELLO 13 ATTEST BY: CAROL GOLD CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY BY: CITY ATTORNEY VOTE: MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR JABLIN COUNCILWOMAN FURTADO COUNCILMAN CLARK COUNCILMAN SABATELLO g /john: pud0002.or Ordinance 32, 2000 Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 16, 2000 Petition PUD -00 -02 AYE NAY ABSENT 14 Ordinance 32, 2000 Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 16, 2000 Petition PUD -00 -02 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, TO WIT: FROM THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY AND THE EAST -WEST QUARTER SECTION LINE OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN SOUTH 88'38'15" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST -WEST QUARTER SECTION LINE A DISTANCE OF 51.86 FEET (ACCORDING TO THE RIGHT -OF -WAY AND TRACT MAP OF THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO., SAID CENTERLINE OF THE FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY RIGHT -OF -WAY BEARS NORTH 14'01'00" WEST AT THIS POINT AND ALL OTHER BEARINGS STATED HEREIN ARE RELATIVE THERETO)_THENCE NORTH 75'59'01" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 131.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 283.37 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 15 °22'45 "; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 76.06 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE SOUTH 88'38'15' EAST, ALONG THE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE A DISTANCE OF 616.56 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1682.15 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6'48'15 "; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 199.76 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE: THENCE NORTH 84'33'30" EAST, ALONG THE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 642.21 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14'01'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 30.34 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 14 °01'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 500 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 84.33'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 440.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14.01'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 478.49 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 81'25.30 "; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 35.53 FEET TO THE END OF SAID CURVE; THENCE NORTH 84'33'30" EAST, ALONG THE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 413.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS AND EXCEPT. THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: PARCEL 110.1 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE FOUND PALM BEACH COUNTY BRASS DISC MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 7. THENCE SOUTH 88'43'16" EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SOUTH 1/2 OF SAID SECTION 7, A DISTANCE OF 3474.71 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01'16'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 161.50 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE OF BURNS ROAD, AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 1241, PAGE 259, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 84'30'43" WEST ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 419.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY AND NORTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 81'25'03 ". A DISTANCE OF 35.52 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 14'03'47" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 13.16 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 54.46'32" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 32.61 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84'30'43" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 352.85 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2136.50 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 01'47'02 ", A DISTANCE OF 66.52 "FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST PROPERTY LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 1853, PAGE 992, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 14'03'47" EAST ALONG SAID PROPERTY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 12.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 15 Ordinance 32, 2000 Meeting Date: November 2, 2000 Date Prepared: October 16, 2000 Petition PUD -00 -02 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 7, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 43 EAST, CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PLAT OF TIE OAKS -SUN TERRACE PLAT 3, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 68, PAGES 70 THROUGH 73 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID PALM BEACH COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 88 °34'14" WEST, ALONG THE WESTERLY EXTENTION OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID THE OAKS -SUN TERRACE PLAT 3, A DISTANCE OF 90.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF TIC HEREIN DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE, CONTINUE ALONG SAID WESTERLY EXTENTION, NORTH 88 °34'14" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 167.45 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 14 005'37" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 411.80 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 06 °34'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 370.43 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF BURNS ROAD AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6438, PAGE 668 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID PALM BEACH COMITY; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, THROUGH THE FOLLOWING THREE COURSES, SOUTH 88 °43'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 80.45 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 1,617.15 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 06 048'15 ", A DISTANCE OF 192.04 FEET, TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE NORTH 84 °28'30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 78.18 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GARDENS EAST DRIVE, AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 6709, PAGE 1410 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID PALM BEACH COUNTY; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE, THROUGH THE FOLLOWING FOUR COURSES, NORTH 35 012'27" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 17.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14 005'44" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 136.85 FEET; THENCE NORTH 10 °25'21" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 325.01 FEET, TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE, CONCAVE EASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 400.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29 027'01 ", A DISTANCE OF 205.60 FEET, TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH A NON - TANGENT LINE; THENCE NORTH 14 °05'44" WEST, ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 15.00 FEET WEST OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PLAT OF THE OAKS -SUN TERRACE PLAT 3, A DISTANCE OF 62.13 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°34'14" WEST, ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 15.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PLAT OF THE OAKS -SUN TERRACE PLAT 3, A DISTANCE OF 243.65 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 °2546" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 6.10 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 16 June 29, 1993 July 1, 1993 RESOLUTION 71, 1993 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE TEMPORARY CONDITIONAL USE OF A TRAILER AS A CLASSROOM ON THE ST. MARK'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL /CHURCH SITE; AND, PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ALL RESOLUTIONS OR PARTS THEREOF IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Council of Palm Beach Gardens hereby authorizes the temporary conditional use of a trailer for a classroom on the St. Mark's Episcopal Church /School site at the corner of Campus Drive and Burns Road. LW �inp raYy use may ,continue until a ` :permanent media .` ti 7a . �enter- � /laboratory';classroom; building is constructed and occupied or` WO�yA�2) }year, }unti'1'.7 31/94;': depending'.which; event shall first" ccur.;. The temporary building shall be located and landscaped in accordance with the following plans: June 24, 1993 Site Plan prepared by Stephen Boruff, AIA, consisting of 1 sheet. June 24, 1993 Landscape Plan prepared by Stephen Boruff, AIA, consisting of 1 sheet. June 2, 1993 Elevation Plan prepared by King's Custom Builders, Inc, Sheet 1 of 4. May 26, 1993, Floor Plan prepared by King's Custom Builders, Inc. Sheet 2 of 4. June 3, 1993 Typical Foundation Plan prepared by King's Custom Builder's Inc. Sheet 3 of 4. June 3, 1993 Cross - Section Plan prepared by King's Custom Builder's Inc. Sheet 4 of 4. Section 2. The following conditions are hereby approved: 1. The shrub material shall be thirty (30) inches in height at planting per City Landscape Code. 2. The temporary trail has been located where there would be no trees removed. The one (1) Maple tree proposed to be relocated is not large enough to be classified as a tree, however, if any trees die due to construction or construction practices the following schedules shall be used to replace the trees on >ite: For every inch of tree caliper lost, three inches of new tree caliper shall be replaced with like specie. The minimum replacement tree shall be three inches in diameter. Palms shall be replaced with like specie one for one with a minimum 10' height. 3. Prior to setti I the trailer, trees designated preservation /rc,- .;ation shall be tagged, and the developer shall erect and maintain protective barriers around the drip line of the trees to be protected. All work shall be inspected and approved by the Architect of Record and City Forester prior to the issuance of any Building Department permits. Section 153.20 (Minimum Tree and Plant Installation Standards) shall also be enforced during construction. 4. All tree protection /relocation and landscape work shall be performed using current professional landscaping standards. The Architect of Record shall monitor all tree protection efforts, all tree relocation work, all landscaping work, and any work that affects the outcome of the approved landscaping plans. The Architect of Record shall notify the City prior to any modification to the approved landscape plan. 5. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy the Architect of Record shall certify in writing to the City that the landscaping has been completed per the approved landscape plans. Any major changes to the approved landscape plans shall be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. Once the City has the certified letter from the Architect, the City Forester shall inspect the site for compliance. Once compliance has been confirmed by the City Forester, the City Building Department shall be notified. Section 3. The aforesaid time period may be extended by subsequent resolution of the City Council. Section 4. Upon termination of use the trailer shall forthwith be removed from the location site. Section 5. All Ordinances or Resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 6. This Resolution shall be effective upon date of passage. PI INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS THE /a'DX 2 pF,,3UL;i, 1993. ATTEST: �iK61A V. KOSIER, CITY CLERK VOTE: AYE MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR MONROE COUNCILMAN JABLIN ✓ COUNCILWOMAN FURTADO V COUNCILMAN CLARK ✓ R'' SZifi R. RUSSO NAY ABSENT August 26, 1994 RESOLUTION 119, 1994 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO ST. MARK'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH CONDITIONAL USE, BY APPROVING A SITE PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 13,775 SQUARE FOOT CLASSROOM/MEDIA CENTER BUILDING; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA; Section 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, hereby approves an Amendment to St. Mark's Episcopal Church Conditional Use, by approving a site plan for construction of a 13,775 square foot classroom/media center on the Site of St. Mark's Episcopal Church, located at the northeast comer of Burns Road and Gardens East Drive. Section 2. The site plan approval for the construction shall be in accordance with and subject to the following plans on file in the City Planning and Zoning Department: 1. Site Plan, dated August 1, 1994, by Fanning/Howey Associates, Inc. (One Sheet). 2. Conceptual Planting, dated August 1, 1994, Plan A by Fanning/Howey Associates, Inc. (One Sheet). 3. Building Planting Plan, dated May 22, 1994, by Fanning/Howey Associates, Inc. (One Sheet). 4. Site Planting Plan, dated May 22, 1994, by Fanning/Howey Associates, Inc. (One Sheet). 5. Exterior Elevations Plan, dated May 19, 1994, by Fanning/Howey Associates, Inc. (One Sheet). 6. First and Second Floor Plans Plan, dated May 19, 1994, by Fanning/Howey Associates, Inc. (Two Sheets). 7. Schematic Site Engineering Plan, dated May 23, 1994, by James E. Neuhaus, Inc. (One Sheet). Section 3. The petitioner shall comply with the following: 1. The St. Mark's Episcopal Church School shall not exceed a 460 student population without verification from the City that the increase complies with the City's Concurrency Management Systems Ordinance. 2. Prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the Landscape Architect of record shall certify in writing to the City that the landscaping has been completed per the approved landscape plans. Any major changes to the approved landscape plans shall be approved by the City Council. Once the City has the certified letter from the Landscape Architect, the City Forester shall inspect the site for compliance. Once compliance has been confirmed by the City Forester, the City Building Department shall be notified. 3. All landscape work shall be performed using current professional landscaping standards. The Landscape Architect of Record shall monitor all landscaping work, and any work that affects the outcome of the approved landscape plans. The Landscape Architect of Record shall notify the City prior to any modification to the approved landscape plan. 4. Prior to cleaning or construction, trees, or native areas designated for preservation shall be tagged or roped —off. Prior to land clearing, the developer shall erect and maintain protective barriers around the drip line of the trees to be protected. All work shall be inspected and approved by the Landscape Architect of Record and the City Forester prior to the issuance of any Building Department permit requiring land clearing. Section 153.20 shall also be enforced during construction. 5. All trees or plants designed for preservation/relocation that die during construction or because of construction practices shall be replaced using the following schedule: For every inch of tree caliper lost, three inches of new tree caliper shall be replaced with like specie. The minimum replacement tree shall be three inches in diameter. Palms shall be replaced with like specie one for one with a minimum 10' height. Shrubs shall be replaced with like specie one for one with a minimum 30" height. If the site can not support the total number of replacement trees as required above, City Council may permit the developer to donate excess trees to the City for planting on public lands. 'I , j,Q {tlme xtens on,s all be,'grantecl or':tfie use'of:the;portable;classrooin structure- . te'as'approved by Resplution 71;_ 1993, until�July;31, 1999 " Section 4. The City Council finds that the amendment provided herein is minor in nature and does not require intervention of the Planning and Zoning Commission or a newspaper publicized notice of hearing. Section 5. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1994. DAVID CLARK, MAYOR ATTEST: LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK by APPROVED AS TO THE LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY A34, CITY ATTORNEY u OCT -23 -00 02:27PM FROM- FANNING HOWEY ASSOC, [j��annmg/Howey Associates, Inc. Architects Engineers Consultants October 19, 2000 Mr. John Lindgren, City Planner City of Palm Beach Gardens Parks and Recreation Department 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 5616844516 T -347 P.02/02 F -869 Re: Planned Unit Development Application (PUD 00 -02) St. Mark's Episcopal School Palm Beach Gardens, Florida Architect's Project No. 99012.02 Dear Mr. Lindgren: This letter is intended to serve as a formal request for a variance on the required parking at St. Mark's Episcopal Church and School. Currently, there are 162 parking spaces provided. The code - required parking is 127 spaces. The 22% overage is generated by the need for special event parking for the church, such as Easter Service, Christmas Service, etc. Additionally, the parking on the west parcel was provided for proximity to the school playfields to accommodate event parking for sporting events. We respectfully request approval of this needed request to provide maximum functionality of the site without negatively imposing on the surrounding properties. Sincerely, i M • 0- L ce P. Courtemanche _ -J Project Consultant CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDEN Ic/lo ocT 2 3 2000 PLANNING & ZONING DEPT. 222 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 148 ♦ West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 697 -3660 4 Fax (561) 684 -4516 'm http: / /www.fhai.com OCT -23 -00 02:26PM FROM- FANNING HOWEY ASSOC, �.*iing/Howey Associates, Inc. Architects Engineers Consultants October 19, 2000 Mr. John Lindgren, City Planner City of Palm Beach Gardens Parks and Recreation Department 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 5616844516 T -347 P.01 /02 F -869 Re: Planned Unit Development Application (PUD 00 -02) St. Mark's Episcopal School Palm Beach Gardens, Florida Architect's Project No. 99012.02 Dear Mr. Lindgren: This letter is intended to serve as a formal request for a variance on the required rear setback (North property line) at the St. Mark's Episcopal School. This request was generated pursuant to aesthetic projections requested by The Planning and Zoning Commission on the North elevation of the proposed new classroom building, at the October 10, 2000 Board Meeting. The projections protrude two feet into the required ten foot setback. Therefore, the request would be to allow an eight foot rear setback to accommodate this change. We respectfully request approval of this needed request to provide maximum functionality of this site without imposing unwanted parking on the surrounding properties. Sincerely, FANNING/ A Lanc P. Co rtemanche P ect Consultant Ic/lo IATES, INC. Mg�'c�GP�OENS ��N \NG &lpNW 222 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 148 q west Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 697 -3660 N Fax (561) 684 -4516 '1 http : / /www.fhai.com Memo to File From: Mark Hendrickson, City Forester A /W- Subject: PUD- 00 -02, St. Mark's School Expansion Date: October 4, 2000 I have reviewed the revised landscape plans submitted September 22, 2000 for the above - referenced petition. All of my previous comments have been addressed. I have no further concerns. I recommend the following condition for the Planning & Zoning Commission consideration at the October 10, 2000 meeting: • The applicant shall maintain the Gardens East Drive landscaping from their east campus to their western recreational property from the north boundary to Burns Road. LlbLf INC. CONSUI:IING CIVIL t:N(IINI-I:RS, SURVI_YORS & P11APPfRS CIVIL AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES WATER & WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING & MAPPING GIs "Partners for Results Value by Design" 3550 S.W. Corporate Pkwy. Palm City, FL 34990 (561) 286 -3883 Fax: (561) 286-3925 www.lbfh.com MEMORANDUM TO: John Lindgren FROM: Sean C. Donahue, P.E. \0) DATE: October 5, 2000 FILE NO. 99 -4099 SUBJECT: St. Mark's PUD Amendment We have reviewed the revised site and landscape plans for the referenced project prepared by Fanning/Howey Associates, Inc. received on September 27, 2000. We have no engineering concerns with the proposed building, building expansion or the associated sidewalk extension. Prior to construction plan approval, the applicant needs to certify that this project meets the SFWMD water quality requirements. SCD/ cc: Roxanne Manning Steve Cramer P:\PR0JECTS\PBGM1EM0\4099 \4099j INC. C'()NSUI;IING CIVIL ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & NIAPr [RS CIVIL AGRICULTURAL WATER RESOURCES WATER & WASTEWATER TRANSPORTATION SURVEYING & MAPPING CIS "Partners For Results Value by Design" 35-50 S.W. Corporate Pkwy. Palm City, FL 34990 (561) 286 -3883 Fax: (561) 286 -3925 www.11)fh.corn MEMORANDUM TO: John Lindgren FROM: Sean C. Donahue, DATE: August 17, 2000 FILE NO. 99 -4099 SUBJECT: St. Mark's School Expansion We have reviewed the City's traffic consultant's comments regarding the referenced project received on August 17, 2000. The City's traffic consultant has determined that this project is in compliance with both Palm Beach County and the City of Palm Beach Gardens Traffic Performance Standards. It should be noted that Gardens East Drive and Campus Drive are not included in the analysis since these roads are not required to be evaluated by TPS. However, they may need to be addressed during the site plan review to assure there is available capacity to handle the additional traffic of the proposed school expansion. A copy of the City's traffic consultant's memorandum is attached. SCD/ cc: Roxanne Manning Jim Norquest Talal Benothman P:\PROJECTS\PBGMEMO\4099\4099i B -16 -200 5:09PM FROM MTP GROUP INC WPB FL +1 561 7950230 p P.2 MTP Group, Inc. 12798 &r#st Hill Boulevard, Suit# 303 • 1 West Palm Beach, FL 33414 -4704 Ay— (561) 795.0678 TWO= (561 ) 795 -0230 August 16, 2000 Sean C. Donahue, P.E. Assistant City Engineer City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 North Military Trail. Palm Beach'Gardens, Florida 33410 Re: St. Mark's School .Traffic Performance Standards Review Dear Mr. Donahue: MTP Group, Inc. has completed a review of the traffic impact analysis prepared by Kimley -Born and Associates, Inc. (dated July 7, 2000) for the project entitled St. Mark's School pursuant to Palm Beach County and City of Palm Beach Gardens Traffic Performance Standards. The project is summarized as follows: Location: Northeast quadrant of the. intersection-of Gardens East Drive and Burns Road Proposed Use: School with a total of 570 students' and 945 square feet of church sanctuary expansion New Trips: 249 -daily trips (for radius of development influence consideration: 759 daily trips) Buildout: 2001 1 Existing - 490 students; Approved prior to 1995 = 320 students We find this project in compliance with both Palm Beach County and City of Palm Beach Gardens Traffic Performance Standards UPS). It should be noted that Gardens East Drive and Campus Drive are not included in the analysis since these roads are not required to be evaluated by TPS. however, they may need to be addressed during site plan review to assure there is available capacity to handle the additional traffic impact of the proposed school expansion. Should you hate any questions or comments about this letter, do not hesitate to give me a call. MTP Gib,[i J Inc. Marfa M. Tejerd, P.E. President c:\uop%rCReclrec safirk'•Mvrova2•wpd CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM TO: John Lindgren, Senior Planner DATE: July 24, 2000 APPROVED: FROM: Jonathan Iles, Supervisor SUBJECT: St. Mark's School Expansion The following comments are forwarded as part of my review of the plans received with your memo dated 7/20/00 for the above named project The Department of Public Works has but one comment regarding this PUD. There is a portion of sodded area on the western side of Gardens East Drive that is currently irrigated by pumps located on RCA Blvd., as part of the approval process for The Oaks PUD. This irrigated strip runs in front of the parcel now owned by St. Marks. The Department requests as part of this approval, clarification of the maintenance responsibilities for the portion of property, including irrigation, from the property line to the edge of Gardens East Drive in the area directly abutting the property owned by St. Marks. If there are any questions concerning this memo, please contact me as soon as possible. incergly, Jonathan Iles CC: DRC file 10/02/00 MON 15:35 FAX 5615757799 SUNRISE COMPANIES 0 002 SUNRISE COMPANIES COMPANIES MEMO VIA FAX 799 -4281 TO: Steve Cramer FROM: Craig Kunkle DATE: October 2, 2000 RE: St. Mark's School Application Comments regarding landscape plan: ( from rendering ) 1. The hedge material planted on inside of fence, should plant on outside to screen fence from adjacent property. 2. The hedge material should extend full length of the fence. 3. The rest of the plan looks great. The photograph numbers 11, 12, 13 and 14 show the east parking lot at sports field not completed/ not maintained. Completion date should be agreed upon. C1IYOFPALM BEACH GARDENS OCT 0 2 2000 PLANNING & ZONING DEPT. 275 TONEY PENNA DRIVE • SUITE 7 - JUPITER, FLORIDA 33458 OFFICE (561) 575 -7792 - TELEFAX (561) 575 -7799 1N3NGN3WV 1N3wdO13A30 11Nn 03NNVld Bj°�m DJ Vma01d'SM3UaVO NOV38 Md Ll i��� �1 s.savw •is Jul 1sag3OOSS� lOOHOS lVdOOSld3 AMOj XVm X � NV Id " 3 1�iS � a3isvw � t, i i i a i umi � i � v,u YSZJ a 1N0:5 � o~a HN I Z 'IN al p I y\ _ 9 I \\ m ii{ .f 9 CC O ii yy m7P19 ¢ �O \i NO MW ...... a. »I a 9�a a E � O � a 4 w a o II ,m C7 n _ Z� Z¢ V <Za g�g0Z) 3iNJ g0m 1NJ 0� ai NJ W pp a Saa�aS as to i i a i umi � i � v,u YSZJ a 1N0:5 � o~a HN I Z 'IN al p I y\ _ 9 I \\ m ii{ .f 9 CC O ii yy m7P19 ¢ �O o O UVOa SNU B _ \i NO MW a D U o o0 N � O � a 4 w a o II ,m C7 o m o0 o `<ZO _ Z� Z¢ V <Za g�g0Z) 3iNJ g0m 1NJ 0� ai NJ o O UVOa SNU B _ V'1TNOW 0002 fiF'FF:gi (I 6ntl nut Emn 1 T9 \10�d \20'21066 \ :0 \i 0 a D U o o0 N � O � a oa a W w a o II ,m C7 o m o0 o `<ZO x�i7 Z� Z¢ V <Za g�g0Z) 3iNJ g0m 1NJ 0� ai NJ V'1TNOW 0002 fiF'FF:gi (I 6ntl nut Emn 1 T9 \10�d \20'21066 \ :0 1� 1N3V40N3WV 1N3Wd013A30 11Nn 03NNVld vallfold '9H30HVD HOV38 IIIVd "IOOHOS IVd00Sld3 SI)IHVw is X3mOH/"uluu d SHVId 3118 G39VHd c II 1 1�1 r t ynrninW nnn;l on:cc •cr 11 hnv nm 5mo'saseu,4 t9\ in4 \7o'Zt066\ :n ad 1111H 1,101 X3mOH/"uluu d SHVId 3118 G39VHd c II 1 1�1 r t ynrninW nnn;l on:cc •cr 11 hnv nm 5mo'saseu,4 t9\ in4 \7o'Zt066\ :n CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: 10/23/00 Meeting Date: 11/02/00 Subject/Agenda Item Appraisal of Preserve Lands. Recommendation /Motion: Consider a motion to approve utilizing highest and best use as the appraisal method for appraising preserve lands. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ Council Action: (Total) City Attorney Finance [ ] Approved $ [ ] Approved w/ Finance Current FY conditions [ ] Denied ACM Advertised: Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Other Date: [ ] Operating Attachments: Paper: [ ] Not Required [ ] Other Memorandum Submitted by: Kent R. Olson 00 Steve B. Cramer Affected parties [ ]Notified Budget Acct. #: [ ] None Approved by: City Manage [ X ] Not required BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: tober 23, 2000 APPROVED: Ronald M. Ferris, Interim City Manag FROM: Kent R. Olson, Finance Director h RO Steven B. Cramer, Principal Planner SUBJECT: Appraisals of Preserve Lands BACKGROUND The City of Palm Beach Gardens Land Development Regulations (LDRs) Section 118 provides for alternative forms of mitigation. The intent of allowing these alternative forms is "to provide a public benefit to the city that equals or exceeds the expected benefit that would have been derived from on -site preservation." These forms include off -site mitigation and payment in lieu of preservation. For payment in lieu of preservation, the payment amount shall be established by averaging two appraisals (one paid by the developer, one by the City) conducted by members of the appraisal institute (MAI). Section 118 further states that "cash payments in lieu of preservation of environmentally significant land, based on appraised land value and as determined by the city council, shall be made to a city fund established for the acquisition of land containing similar native vegetation, other environmentally significant lands, or any ecological or environmental improvements to public lands." DISCUSSION On September 28, several members of the staff held a meeting to discuss the issue of appraisal methodology. The several appraisals the City has conducted over the years have utilized the highest and best use approach to determine the property's value. Given that if the preserve is removed the developer conceivably would develop that section of the property, it would be appropriate to value the property on a highest and best use approach. In addition, were we to purchase preserve to replace preserve destroyed under this provision of the LDRs, we would be paying someone else for their property based upon "highest and best use." We spoke by phone with Ralph Monticello of Palm Beach County's Property and Real Estate Management Division. Mr. Monticello stated that the County has this same provision in their Land Development Regulations, and that the methodology used is the "highest and best use" for determining the property's value. Mr. Monticello also stated that the County uses "highest and best use" for appraisals conducted by the County for the purchase of environmentally sensitive lands. We also spoke to an appraiser who has done appraisal work for the City in the past regarding appraisal methodologies for preserves. He recommended that the best method to be utilized for this process is the highest and best use method noted above. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City utilize the highest and best use method for appraising properties under Section 118 of the Land Development Regulations. Att. (4) Density transfer. Utilization of the density transfer provisions in section 115 to allow retention of preserve areas in an undisturbed manner, provided suitable means for maintenance and protection of such areas are established. (5) Retention by owners. Retention of the preserve area by a homeowners' or property owners' association subject to the restrictions listed below. a. Such preserve area shall remain undivided, and a lot unit owner or any other person shall not be able to bring any action for partition or division of any part thereof. Each lot or unit owner's undivided interest shall be preserved, protected, and maintained through recorded covenants running with the land or a developer's agreement. Title of such area shall be encumbered for the perpetual benefit of the public generally, and all future use shall be consistent with the intent and purpose of the preservation of open space, as provided in the city's comprehensive plan and herein. b. A stated obligation on behalf of the association to pay for the cost of care and maintenance of all preserve areas; and C. A management plan, approved by the city, shall be incorporated into the association documents prior to final approval of construction drawings or commencement of land alteration, whichever occurs first. Sec. 118. Alternative forms of mitigation. (a) Purpose and intent. The purpose and intent of allowing the approval of an alternative form of mitigation is to provide a public benefit to the city that equals or exceeds the expected benefit that would have been derived from on -site preservation. (b) Alternative mitigation programs. Altemative forms of mitigation that may be approved by the city include, but shall not be limited to, the programs listed below. (1) Off -site preservation. Off -site preservation of environmentally significant habitat equal to or greater in size than the requirement stated in section 116. (2) Payment in lieu of preservation. a. Cash payments in lieu of preservation of environmentally significant land, based on appraised land value and as determined by the city council, shall be made to a city fund established for the acquisition of land containing similar native vegetation, other environmentally significant lands, or any ecological or environmental improvements to public lands. b. The beautification and environmental committee shall provide recommendations to City of Palm Beach Gardens/Land Development Regulations Adopted July 20, 2000 217 the city council for use of funds obtained in lieu of preservation of environmentally significant lands. C. The total sum of money required in lieu of preservation of environmentally significant lands shall be determined by the amount of land normally required for preservation and the location thereof. The value thereof shall be determined by two property appraisers, who are members of the appraisal institute (MAI). One appraiser is to be appointed by the city and the other by the developer. Each party shall bear the expense of the respective appraiser appointed. Both appraisals shall meet appropriate city standards. The amount of money determined by averaging the two appraisals shall be paid by the developer to the city at the time of final development order approval by the city council or as the city council may authorize. (3) Environmental restoration or creation. Restoration, reestablishment, or creation of artificial environments which may occur within or outside the limits of a proposed development. The applicant shall provide evidence that such mitigation will be beneficial to species designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern. The applicant also must demonstrate the area to be improved is equal to at least one hundred percent (100 %) of the preservation area required by these land development regulations. Sec. 119. Removal of invasive nonnative plants and vegetation relocation. Nonnative plants and vegetation relocation. The standards listed below shall apply to invasive nonnative plant species and to vegetation relocation. (1) Nonnative species prohibited. The installation of invasive nonnative species into any preserve area in the city is prohibited. (2) Removal. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, all invasive nonnative plant species, as defined in section 159, shall be removed from the entire site, including the preserve area. (3) Verification of removal. A certificate of occupancy or other official acceptance of completed work shall not be issued until all required removal of invasive species has been completed and is in accordance with the approved development order or management plan. (4) Removal of native vegetation. Removal of native vegetation shall be minimized in the land development process. When feasible, native material shall be relocated on site. Native vegetation which cannot be transplanted or relocated on -site is encouraged to be offered for donation or to be sold by the applicant. City of Palm Beach Gardens/Land Development Regulations Adopted July 20, 2000 218 City of Palm Beach Gardens Council Agenda November 2, 2000 Council Chambers 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Mayor Russo : / Council Member Clark ✓ Council Member Furtado ,✓ Vice Mayor Jablin ,/ Council Member Sabatello / 11-i3 -oo (2, a to /S yrl ¢ a . 6- g P, All those wishing to address the City Council need to complete the necessary form (supply located in back of Council Chambers) and submit same to the City Clerk prior to the meeting being called to order. I. II. III. IV. V. y C VI. Cj�G,LS e� VII. x� CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING NOVEMBER 2, 2000 7:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS: PRESENTATIONS: CITY MANAGER REPORT: Al 0rdnN*�� *�gNalia�l Cr ��toreh�- a. Engineering Report - kw o k t- - WArvr< hMh,T. - A. 0 r b. Public Information Report -'3-t 4 C. Presentation of the City's Website._ 3-4,t - 141-em d. Growth Management Report - Tra-m a - era.. %,, _ 1�- m sp -&.-� �S � @-s k4. e. Municipal Complex Change Orders - AI)I)I,,D -1 w- ZosiN 413 e xt 1M+$. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC: (For Items Not on the Agenda) (Please L° i.n�r►,i submit request card to Clerk prior to this Item) CONSENT AGENDA: C N a. Consideration of approving Minutes from the October 5, 2000 Regular City Council Meeting. b. Resolution 84, 2000 - Seacoast Utility Authority Joint Participation Agreement. Consideration of authorizing an Agreement with Seacoast Utility Authority for Joint Participation and Project Funding in connection with the widening of Burns Road. P l )1, I + I ) C. Resolution 99, 2000 — PGA National Street Signs. Consideration of approving an amendment to the Master Signage Plan for the PGA National Resort Community Planned Community District. VIII. PUBLIC HEARINGS: o k„ RR -SaA "a a. Resolution 47, 2000 — 2700 PGA Boulevard Sign Variance. Consideration of granting two variances to the 15 -foot setback and 300 - foot frontage requirements of Section 110 -36, entitled "Ground Signs," of the City Code for an existing ground sign located at 2700 PGA Boulevard. (Continued from October 19, 2000 City Council meeting) Fg. IX. RESOLUTIONS: a. Resolution 86, 2000 — Initial Assessment Resolution for PGA Flyover. e". Consideration of a Resolution relating to the construction of certain local improvements within the proposed PGA Flyover Assessment Area; 2 ,�r determining the estimated capital cost of the PGA Flyover enhancements; s- v establishing the terms and conditions of the proposed special assessments; establishing a public hearing to consider imposition of the proposed assessments and the method of their collection. — �- ^ r bo r i--o wt 'Pgca'V%ttf3A"Qv� Aa.^r. b. Resolution 100, 2000 — Embankment Easement. Consideration of ��AA authorizing execution of an Embankment Easement in favor of Palm Beach County in exchange for compensation in the amount of $1,982.00. .J -U C. Resolution 102, 2000 - Appointment to Fire Pension Board — Hugh Perry. ,0,.,,,,,. X7-0 FukrAOv d. Resolution 103, 2000 - Appointment to Police Pension Board — Ken Altman. c s.#,�aK CTNcy %_.&) X. ORDINANCES: (For Consideration on First Reading) a. Ordinance 30, 2000 - Benjamin High School Rezoning. Consideration of approving the application of the Benjamin Private School, Inc., for Cyr,, 94< rezoning of 50 acres of land, located at the Northwest corner of the , a, intersection of Central Boulevard and an unnamed future East -West Road from Planned Development Area to Public /Institutional with a Planned Unit Development overlay, in order to construct a 187,671 square foot private high school campus; providing for waivers and conditions. b. Ordinance 32, 2000 — St. Mark's School Expansion. Consideration of approving an application from St. Mark's Church, Inc. for an amendment and expansion of a Planned Unit Development by approving the construction of a 14,000 square -foot school building, a 945 square -foot church addition, and a two year time extension for a trailer on an 11 acre 4-0 OrLew- T-N D �-ru h 4W u 01- Arj6pJ - h'1oN�rort? ��,-rica `VC��C��goi2NOU9 site, located at the Northeast and Northwest corners of Burns Road and Hardens East Drive, as more particularly described herein; providing for conditions of approval; providing for waivers. XI. ITEMS FOR COUNCIL ACTION: I-Tnli-*j CA" L--AN OAlnrv�-kY,o a. Appraisals of Preserve Lands XII. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION: XIII. ITEMS & REPORTS BY MAYOR AND COUNCIL: XIV. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT: XV. ADJOURNMENT. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Florida Statute 86.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodations to participate in this proceeding should contact the City Clerk's Department, no later than S days prior to the proceeding at telephone number (561) 799 -4120 for assistance; if hearing impaired, telephone the Florida Relay Service Numbers (800) 955 -8771 (TDD) or (800) 955 -8700 (VOICE), for assistance. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Council, with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, they will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose, they may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based 1AVA( -K.)- a1Nl�C�C3 ��st rINCa - U�IS eN� C/4R4 l� (�- �ec,.rC� - NAT(0Nel 0,1, 1 rATO�i �oN - �C:/9rnu�0ltY�- �o��,e��� --rL=-A- v,- IN At,- G� a4 r t r cd ems` C vYI, do cv le 0 V Grt CD 6-10 _ ��► L- LTC Cd144mLrc 41, C9I' ��y> rn RGL_ - 1:CotVC>Mrq- �� �N - �ly(o t-��zc y e L- C ot, S L tr It a (f, 4e /& M E M O R A N D U M WATTERSON, HYLAND & KLETT, P.A. To: Hon. Mayor and City Council From: Leonard G. Rubin, City Attorney 4�1 Subject: Municipal Complex Change Orders File No: 319.072 Date: October 30, 2000 In accordance with the City Council's request, attached please find for your review and approval: • Change Orders 1 OR, 11 R, 12, 13 and 14 (and all supporting documentation) • Application and Certificate for Payment. All of these materials have been reviewed by Ray Casto and Bill Mignogna of O'Donnell, Naccarato & Mignogna, Inc., who recommend approval of same. As indicated at the October 19, 2000 meeting, these Change Orders are the result of extensive negotiations between Suffolk and the City to resolve all outstanding issues relating to the construction of the municipal complex. The Council deferred consideration of these Change Orders until such time as the City staff could provide the Council with all of the necessary documentation. Should you have any questions relative to the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact this office. cc: Stanley D. Klett, Esquire Ron Ferris, Interim City Manager Kent Olson, Finance Director PACPWin\ History\001017A\ABE.AO(Igr)(319.072) V 01DONNELL, NACCRRATO & MIGNOGNA. INC. WILLIAM C. MIGNOGNA, P.E., PRESIDENT October 30, 2000 DWAYNE R. JACKSON, P.E., ASSOCIATE Mr. Stan Klett Watterson, Hyland & Klett, P.A. 4100 RCA Boulevard Suite 100 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 RE: Palm Beach Gardens Municipal Complex Project No.: 998.001 We have reviewed the following proposed change orders and have commented on each. We recommend payment of the attached °Contractor's Application For Payment ". Please find attached enclosed list. Please feel free to contact us if you have any further questions regarding this project. O'DONNEL, NACARRATO & MIGNOGNA, INC. William C. Mignogna, P.E. President CC: Len Rubin Kent Olsen Jack Hanson 321 15TH STREET - SUITE 200 - WEST PALM BEACH, IFL 331410 1 = 551 -835 -9994 - FAx 561- 835 -8255 • WWW.ONM.NET PHILADELPHIA, PA - 215- 925 -3788 O'DONNELL, NACARRATO AND MIGNOGNA, INC. PCO# ORIGINAL AMOUNT —AMOUNT APPROVED COMMENTS Responcibilty Partv 50 3,421.00 669.00 Equipment as specified would not fit in one box ADG 61 3,458.00 1,518.00 Drawings were inconsistent ADG 63 7,812.00 7,812.00 Not provided for on drawings but required by Seacoast ADG 64 7,829.00 7,829.00 Original documents did not provide hurricane glass in fire station ADG 75 50,871.00 20,338.00 Required by Bel south Outside agency 79 13,186.00 13,186.00 Original drawings would not work. Engineer came to site and relocated. ADG 82 - 3,296.00 - 3,296.00 Non - galvanized interior door frames for Police Station city PBG 84 1,814.00 1,300.00 Original design would not work. ADG 86 13,040.00 13,040.00 Contract allows for increases due to outside source. 88 4,328.00 2,715.00 Design was for plastic boxes in sidewalk of the sports complex - due to delivery trucks going to concession stand - they broke. Arch. did not anticipate that owne would drive 90 11,721.00 11,721.00 Grades were wrong on drawings. ADG 93 - 4,318.00 - 4,318.00 Delete file in police station PBG 94 6,905.00 3,715.00 Drawings show transformer. In middle of driveway - extra is for additional wire and labor. ADG 95 21,468.00 13,954.00 Install feeders, no design was provided. ADG 97 6,900.00 6,900.00 1,600 L.F. of wood blocking ADG 100 1 1,863.00 1,863.00 Water rerouting in city hall PBG 103 1,244.00 1,244.00 No masonry wall was shown in drawings. ADG 105 1,023.00 1,023.00 Remove north wail of Files/Storage 134 PSG 106 198.00 198.00 City hall Room 127A - Chase North Wall Deletion PBG 109 1,142.00 11142.00 Required fixture mounts in Police Station PBG 111 9,266.00 9,266.00 Relocation of score keepers boxes and conduits to new location at ball fields PBG 112 440.00 440.00 Installation of additional chase per RFI #442 PBG, 107 3,198.00 2,729.00 Roof drawings as designed would not work. P.S. ADG 113 3,160.00 1,735.00 Same as 107. C.H. ADG 114 1,481.00 1,481.00 If installed as drawn - ceiling height would have been insufficient for use as physical agility room. ADG 115 17,587.00 17,587.00 Change by architect. ADG 116 3,026.00 3,026.00 Requested Ernie Carr. PBG 117 3,062.00 3,062.00 Required by building inspector. PBG 118 608.00 608.00 Required by building inspector. PBG 119 13,518.00 8,432.00 Ceiling plan as drawn had hallway ceiling varying from 8' + to less than 7'. ADG 120 4,959.00 4,959.00 1st location was not large enough to accommodate equipment. ADG 121 264.00 264.00 As designed, wall was not deep enough to hold panel. ADG 122 1,269.00 1,269.00 Design did not allow for ductwork. ADG 123 -63.00 - 500.00 Changed ceiling to accommodate four (4) access panels. ADG 124 2,276.00 2,276.00 Door schedule incorrect. ADG 125 1 576.00 576.00 Request by fire department. PBG Page 1 of 4 O'DONNELL, NACARRATO AND MIGNOGNA, INC. PCO# ORIGINAL AMOUNT APPROVED AMOUNT COMMENTS Responcibilty Party 126 8,712.00 3,448.00 Not shown on drawings. No detail shown as to how to ground. ADG 127 1 1,675.00 1,675.00 End walls against glass window. ADG 128 - 2,500.00 - 2,500.00 Credit for pond foundation PSC 130 13,101.00 13,101.00 Revised Finish Schedule for Susan Bardin P&L 131 103.00 103.00 Per PR #27, to delete scored concrete at 3 areas per drawing from Ray Castro PSG 132 2,651.00 2,651.00 Ceiling schedule and light fixture schedule in confect. ADG 133 3,363.00 3,368.00 Revised Trench Dram System to a Fiber glass Drain, radius pieces with PVC grating PSG 134 1,053.00 1,053.00 Field modification to platform rails in Police Station ADG 135 35,000.00 12,985.00 Driveway as designed would not allow largest thick to turn. ADG 136 4,142.00 4,142.00 Addition of GFI Devises to light poles in Plaza PSG 137 447.00 447.00 Install two additional bollards to protect relocate fire sprinkler riser PSG 138 2,285.00 2,285.00 Relocate door to Evidence office#144 into Evidence Prep #143 PSG 141 481.00 481.00 Ceiling schedule and light fixture schedule in conflict. ADG 142 3,993.00 3,993.00 Install fire sprinkler heads under the overhead doors in the F.S. Apparatus Bay Code Required 143 251.00 251.00 Core drilling for city hall. PSG 144 3,166.00 3,166.00 Request for addition plywood for telephone backer board in Police Station PSG 145 3,166.00 3,166.00 Request for additional plywood for telephone backer board in the Police Station PSG 146 18,401.00 18,401.00 Various electrical changes in the Police Station and City Hall PSG 147 5,298.00 5,298.00 Interior revisions in police station. PSG 148 9,526.00 9,526.00 Required by city. PSG 149 12,163.00 12,163.00 Design called for residential hood -fire department required hood with ansil system to meet code. ADG 15C 1,71 5.00 1,71 5.00 Requested by E. Carr. PSG 151 2,277.00 2,277.00 Required to finish top edge of concrete. ADG 155 965.00 965.00 RFI #493 ADG 156 1,535.00 1,535.00 Building elevation & plaza elevation in conflict. Ramp necessary to meet code. No specs by ADG ADG 157 8,945.00 8,945.00 Required by equipment manual. ADG 158 10,013.00 10,013.00 Requested by fire department. PSG 159 20,979.00 9,220.00 Requested by city. PSG 161 1,727.00 1,727.00 Required by code. ADG 167 1 929.00 929.00 Required by E. Carr. PSG 173 614.00 614.00 Not shown in drawings ADG 174 7,767.00 7,767.00 As drawn, ceiling would have had numerous access panels. ADG 178 3,637.00 1 3,637.00 Elevations on drawings wrong. ADG 180 1 30,453.00 1 15,216.00 System would not work as drawn. JADG Page 2 of 4 O'DONNELL, NACARRATO AND MIGNOGNA, INC. PCO# ORIGINAL AMOUNT APPROVED AMOUNT COMMENTS Resaoncibilty Party 181 315.00 315.00 Conflict between reflected ceiling and light fixtures schedule. ADG 182 306.00 306.00 Temporary cylinders in P.S. & C.H. PBG 183 27,175.00 0.00 Work not performed. 187 4,926.00 4,926.00 Required changes to city managers office area. PBG 188 1,282.00 1,282.00 Not in drawings. Necessary to meet code. ADG 190 711.00 711.00 Revisions to city had walls. PBG 192 1,289.00 1,289.00 Required by Hanson @ Carr PBG 201 462.00 462.00 Required by E. Carr PBG 211 3,707.00 3,707.00 Required by city. PBG 212 4,786.00 2,393.00 Remove debris from move in. PBG 213 22,746.00 22,746.00 Various field changes in police station. PBG 214 40,239.00 40,239.00 Various field changes in city had PBG 215 5,042.00 5,042.00 Required by errors in drawings. ADG 216 7,097.00 7,097.00 Required by city. PBG 217 5,206.00 5,206.00 Errors in drawings. ADG 218 420.00 420.00 Required by city. PBG 220 1,644.00 1,644.00 Required by code. ADG 516.00 0.00 Duplicate of previous C.O. 224 295,410.00 119,801.00 Approved by Len Rubin. 225 1.876.00 1,876.00 Required by city. PBG 226 1 5,876.00 2,500.00 Labor for cleaning & moving attic stock. PBG 227 2,331.00 2,331.00 Required by city. PBQ 229 2,673.00 2,673.00 Electrical changes in fire station. PBG 230 8,793.00 5,703.00 Required by city. PBG 231 195.00 195.00 Required by city.(raifing at police station) PBG 233 802.00 802.00 Required by city. PBG 1,161.00 1,161.00 To facilitate move in. PQQ .234 588700 5-88TOO Required by city. .916 240 6,302.00 6,302.00 Required by City PBG 241 2.044.00 0.00 242 6,110.00 3,652.00 Required by city. PBG 243 5,025.00 4,000.00 1. Rio -Bak time & material charge and tree removal approved. 2. Charge for lower invert on north side os structure #26 approved. Work was completed as per request approval ADG 44 3,282.00 282.0 Work was completed as per request approved. PQQ 245 18,981.00 0.00 Glass replacement, 65 pieces of glass are not within industry standards. PCO GC 246 123,180.00 0.00 Future paving proposal was submitted to the city council in consideration and they did not approve it. GC 247 6,689.00 6,689.00 Repair of communications cable completed 3/18100. PBG 49,744.00 460.0 Civil revisions to the police station and city hall. AQQ 249 447.00 447.00 Tree stump removal approved by city. PBG 250 2,546.00 2,546.00 Extended fencing rental extension was required and approved. PBG 251 1,368.00 1,368.00 Survey for mail kiosk approved per city, Jack Hanson. PBG Page 3 of 4 O'DONNELL, NACARRATO AND MIGNOGNA, INC. PCO# ORIGINAL AMOUNT APPROVED AMOUNT COMMENTS Resnoncibiity Parbir 252 12,339.00 6,750.00 Sewer line under Bums Road, this PCO is not approved. A different way to complete this job and is proposed and being looked at by Tim Messier, Seacoast and Jack Hanson at the Palm Beach Gardens Building Department. ADG 255 4,585.00 4,585.00 Additional fire protection ADG 257 19 678.32 19 678.32 �� and drainage.. - PBG. 258 7,815.50 7,815.50 Remove S replace existing hinges PBG 260 2,478.63 247863 Additional type "D" curbs PBG 261 563.95 563.95 Touch up paint at Police Station PBG 263 - 37,645.00 - 37,645.00 Credit for Landscaping PBG 0 .83 5,350.83 Stamped Concrete p 265 25,000.00 15,353.27 Miscellaneous drywall changes ADG 4,356.73 PBG TOTAL 1,152,026.23 652,273.23 Negotiated Savings 499,753.00 Page 4 of 4 OCT -17 -2000 TUE 05 :53 Pr 9= a Ne H• C T b7 f u n � Cw'r o � r w •� ` n O + eD O n It OA C • n, y iT% r) -,• 1 N p n G v" 7. 7 r r0 � O� Sd G � ✓1 O� O� r U 7 i t r� A ..1 C F v F; M1 U i•. >y�� n 81 f7) K A a n m L3 v Cj n ' Z 1 L i `o 3 C rn a 3 : 0 or Z� �O n (V F AX NO. r) R, ;-"Ow c 5, V CO !> ? v 0 n O n S d O W W ..a N T �-' � ^ ^ & O �Q IV 13 N N N •e -% 00 O O O o 7C p S y Q 6 0 0 0 0 00000 N N 44 St c a 3 z IT b C lb m c L m c O N W A (J1 N 72 r-, ONO)-" r- b � O v G N W A�:t�� N Cnooa o z N W cD O W. (p _+ v W N A A (D CO O 3' 2• 0 0 o c M 7 i Y � R° y S P e •O i .r P � 7x c r z n+ 1�` C j o ,� •n X+ o n Cy7 O �.;M. T A i•, � J f m� v r • O •r. 0 Q (J1 W (G O T N CD (D • c c fV + W O CJ W O O O to io L r f) 7 0 �• O Y ^ / Z 4 m -4 g n 0 � 70 cb ;n n A OQ ,y i O X M/ { D r c 0 W c z N 0 a 4 � M � D n) v m O A A J\ i y rr.. 'I Ci' ' r•. ^ r � — n i� n o' z P^, N N N 1 J J O O N W to (D W W NN(DN W W O O of O A O F r Q Is v �• cn � O G � nn C Lam-, to 2 n 7 T � r � o; S N R � � G � •^ P7 W i - W n O c n 07J 15 -4 O O obi o n � O � ry w 0 X O R I is A 3 A. �. N n n n_ O b .. 51 1) v '° > F m C r 1 1 r C 1 0 T w_ m „ o y► r 0 J� l 7 Y v n C 7. n N O 3' 2• 0 0 o c M 7 i Y � R° y S P e •O i .r P � 7x c r z n+ 1�` C j o ,� •n X+ o n Cy7 O �.;M. T A i•, � J f m� v r • O •r. 0 Q (J1 W (G O T N CD (D • c c fV + W O CJ W O O O to io L r f) 7 0 �• O Y ^ / Z 4 m -4 g n 0 � 70 cb ;n n A OQ ,y i O X M/ { D r c 0 W c z N 0 a 4 � M � D n) v m O A A J\ i y rr.. 'I Ci' ' r•. ^ r � — n i� n o' z P^, N N N 1 J J O O N W to (D W W NN(DN W W O O of O A O F r Q Is v �• cn � O G � nn C Lam-, to 2 n 7 T � r � o; S N R � � G � •^ P7 W i - W n O c n 07J 15 -4 O O obi o n � O � ry w 0 X O R I is A 3 A. �. N n n n_ O b .. 51 1) v '° > F m C r 1 1 r C 1 0 T w_ m „ o y► r 0 J� l 7 Y v n C 7. n N 0 Q (J1 W (G O T N CD (D • c c fV + W O CJ W O O O to io L r f) 7 0 �• O Y ^ / Z 4 m -4 g n 0 � 70 cb ;n n A OQ ,y i O X M/ { D r c 0 W c z N 0 a 4 � M � D n) v m O A A J\ i y rr.. 'I Ci' ' r•. ^ r � — n i� n o' z P^, N N N 1 J J O O N W to (D W W NN(DN W W O O of O A O F r Q Is v �• cn � O G � nn C Lam-, to 2 n 7 T � r � o; S N R � � G � •^ P7 W i - W n O c n 07J 15 -4 O O obi o n � O � ry w 0 X O R I is A 3 A. �. N n n n_ O b .. 51 1) v '° > F m C r 1 1 r C 1 0 T w_ m „ o y► r 0 J� l 7 Y v n C 7. n N O to io L r f) 7 0 �• O Y ^ / Z 4 m -4 g n 0 � 70 cb ;n n A OQ ,y i O X M/ { D r c 0 W c z N 0 a 4 � M � D n) v m O A A J\ i y rr.. 'I Ci' ' r•. ^ r � — n i� n o' z P^, N N N 1 J J O O N W to (D W W NN(DN W W O O of O A O F r Q Is v �• cn � O G � nn C Lam-, to 2 n 7 T � r � o; S N R � � G � •^ P7 W i - W n O c n 07J 15 -4 O O obi o n � O � ry w 0 X O R I is A 3 A. �. N n n n_ O b .. 51 1) v '° > F m C r 1 1 r C 1 0 T w_ m „ o y► r 0 J� l 7 Y v n C 7. n N c 0 W c z N 0 a 4 � M � D n) v m O A A J\ i y rr.. 'I Ci' ' r•. ^ r � — n i� n o' z P^, N N N 1 J J O O N W to (D W W NN(DN W W O O of O A O F r Q Is v �• cn � O G � nn C Lam-, to 2 n 7 T � r � o; S N R � � G � •^ P7 W i - W n O c n 07J 15 -4 O O obi o n � O � ry w 0 X O R I is A 3 A. �. N n n n_ O b .. 51 1) v '° > F m C r 1 1 r C 1 0 T w_ m „ o y► r 0 J� l 7 Y v n C 7. n N y rr.. 'I Ci' ' r•. ^ r � — n i� n o' z P^, N N N 1 J J O O N W to (D W W NN(DN W W O O of O A O F r Q Is v �• cn � O G � nn C Lam-, to 2 n 7 T � r � o; S N R � � G � •^ P7 W i - W n O c n 07J 15 -4 O O obi o n � O � ry w 0 X O R I is A 3 A. �. N n n n_ O b .. 51 1) v '° > F m C r 1 1 r C 1 0 T w_ m „ o y► r 0 J� l 7 Y v n C 7. n N F r Q Is v �• cn � O G � nn C Lam-, to 2 n 7 T � r � o; S N R � � G � •^ P7 W i - W n O c n 07J 15 -4 O O obi o n � O � ry w 0 X O R I is A 3 A. �. N n n n_ O b .. 51 1) v '° > F m C r 1 1 r C 1 0 T w_ m „ o y► r 0 J� l 7 Y v n C 7. n N 1 1 r C 1 0 T w_ m „ o y► r 0 J� l 7 Y v n C 7. n N y► r 0 J� l 7 Y v n C 7. n N OCT -17 -2000 `PUE 05 :53 PM FAX N0. N N N .1 a -4 -h Y N t, W L c n„1A �'• r r AmN tn��mmtntganmw,�oD- N V ;: wf O wf O 0 �mG7G7-�� OI 01 n 7 z a Q O O O O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD O =' a n v z m m ro a 0 s ro y i, i. c r C m b 7t m O° N n A m m E IAD G O O S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °i c- Q° m m 0= o ro r M ♦ m 11 p r.1 Cn cl- N N= C A N V rJ Ql A V b V 11 N _ N -J tND d Ol C m = G7 O p rp Ta O d d of Y 3 O= N_ Z cf T LL R .m R -Ci �+ O Cn F. Y 5 U d ° o a A D 0 0 p tr N CO 0 0 u G O O O O O Cn O O O O a m o o a m m IA Z4 c m .� Dm °mD =z t`"e C m O m D 7 J N �. Ll Ol 0 M a d C7 cr m n IA T �4 U, " O N ^ iO 0013_ Z� O V O O O 00 tr O O O O O • O - -i y A = m z N� 0. CL Z � A C t D i► � N Cf CD CD �v sT a a m m N N y O m 0 N tb N .+ J Y N 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 C. N O N V J O (° QI U �! rD N v A N N V O A Q1 M N m M W Q C O 'NA cN n O n CN UCi 0 0 0 0 O GH O O 1: U C.r -" n N U V N N 00 O O G L O O c� e- C� O O O O cr C• I- C. v U U CU U O O O N NI O O O S O G Lo U V U 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O C) CD C-r O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cm, O O O O C> o p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u • .. .. • • i'- J= i'• i'� B� erg 2e, a e- * d� .. .. z • i- • : e i 's- V O " Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C.� 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O C, U p 0 O O G O O O O O g C. 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P. 333x' 1t3 Z O m m �i n n C1 C7 D a m m -fzA N O Z pn m C O n T r m O A V � r .1 a -4 -h Y t, W L O L r Y Y— w s rh V b O u V m O, er a Y O N in Q N V ;: wf O wf O 0 -. N J O A- m 1.1 4 [M to O O u� O OI 01 N W O 411 O O O O N N N N m W O♦ O O O O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O 10 .2 O O 0 0 0 0 {A V N N O O S O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O N 01 -a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N O CO C O IAD G O O S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i v m m ♦ m 11 p r.1 Cn O -J N A N V rJ Ql A V b V 11 N _ N -J tND d Ol O j- L N v m G J m CO Qf O or -Ci �+ O Cn C O Ln IV A. N -1 W p pp i- Al N U U O W 0 0 p tr N CO 0 0 u G O O O O O Cn O O O O O O to O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m o O A .� Dm °mD =z =m° m an U1 J N �. W Ol O, ni n co V {J t0 2n 4 to O U, " O w N O O V O O O 00 tr O O O O O C.3 O O O 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 C. N O N V J O (° QI U �! rD N v A N N V O A Q1 M N m M W Q C O 'NA cN n O n CN UCi 0 0 0 0 O GH O O 1: U C.r -" n N U V N N 00 O O G L O O c� e- C� O O O O cr C• I- C. v U U CU U O O O N NI O O O S O G Lo U V U 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O C) CD C-r O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cm, O O O O C> o p O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u • .. .. • • i'- J= i'• i'� B� erg 2e, a e- * d� .. .. z • i- • : e i 's- V O " Cl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C.� 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O C, U p 0 O O G O O O O O g C. 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 P. 333x' 1t3 Z O m m �i n n C1 C7 D a m m -fzA N O Z pn m C O n T r m O A V � O � b P n y O O X Z C 0 � Z b r N � i v m m m 11 p O CJ O (A M m A c') mZM, O` N Z O O Z Z rl j o ° D a m m o O A .� Dm °mD =z =m° com°r crcl m D � P it � N 0 0 1 m O n � z z s y A = m m -1 J � - O -L D O m OCT -17 -2000 TUE 05;54 PM FAX N0.9,% a V N _o c; i p1 ^ c o 0 o Pe o Nt o 0 90 a , X 2 0 o w '" o m n m 'T W o o� c, d �' o r o m a o �1 t. > n r. O m m N N S W N m f1 la�ri of foa' N o a yom p a c ,n to N a s W 'n a c a c T <+ �] c T ^ a c 0 m S c i c �• m N c m a c ae to N e pr m 7 m z CL COW- Y'o N (, N OI al N Q N n d r c� u m 0 v, O v, O h O' to u 7 > > w w �. M W y 4 N u � T b 'y f a W m N L• v O W 2 O T a� D r � 3 Wm SS mm N N rC O Z v � D � A O r v b D I M m "a V m a C C m q.. > z D O O O Z 2 2 m'imm o .. m e_ y = Z � m O 3 N � O O � O N O N 0 0 p m 1 r O C) O V U /J U u tr w + N b to V U+ + N -. T J a+ u m C C W N L fr N N O V1 m V O O O N N O V O rr O O N O O O N O O Of b n m r O O 0 0 o C O O p q O O S O O g 008 O O + 0 0 00 S 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 lr o� N o" m O G O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b u O G, p v o v gb ,D v 1. N U fv LA CD N tp [T J N -+ -� N- tT V o -� U 01 D m V N A VI n) (r G U O �! 6 G 0 tr N O :-I HI 10 O J .a h� cic, o,$S8 8H 88$8 tO� 88 Oooc3 C :.c ° � �N� OCR 0 0 0 cc 00 O O O L O U O O v U O O o b o G) p G, ."'C A O 3 S r N O m m � w m � p v o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g 0 0 0 0 0 ° o c, p IA n 0 m m m z G � D t7 o -4 ( p + O ~ > a O (n cu .� N w m V U N + C1 -J Y tj G> }' D o m m m G c, oij0c, C C) C) cbbcc,c,ne., 00 00p0 000000 c v+c, — m p U c) c) C, v c) co n n c� C'% CD [[n O O pp O A 0 0 O O N O 0 O ci C) G> �� n n p g q _ p o o O O p o O O O O U 0 0 0 o ci P G U V J o U G> ci O O O O O O O O O O O G u ct O U O O O O U c, ai .. .. .: .. � ., ,. . :� - .• r :� of a~ �: z;� a= ::; �° a' : "• a= z' o n _ Z z Z cn 0 = m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m J � _ P z ' D n O O G 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 0 0 g O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O G> m a� D r � 3 Wm SS mm N N rC O Z v � D � A O r v b D I M m "a V m a C C m q.. > z D O O O Z 2 2 m'imm o .. m e_ y = Z � m O 3 N � O O � O N O N 0 0 OCT -17 -2000 TUE 05:54 PM FAX NO. P. iLi38 V O O1 O O) C C11 � � A A as mm (O'1 C n n' �j' y $ $ N n C f f�, Q Lo b b `l U: C (/1 7 A A� i!) N N Gi CD: y o n W A •rJ, i ci O O 611 V O t t!1 2 G T� i i7 iu O % %. N 6�r 0 c c n o? n ? y? a;1 M a a o rb. a' a• - a 0 0 0 T W 2$ m P a c c a a H N < r W? 2 = V1 b d A m m m m { a a 3 d d m m o ?? fl C7 0 m a a C Cy1 O 2 a � � r r x t) C, CD V J. w N Cf1 1+ m V N N N Y1 N 10 A 0 0+ W �' M 1 m r wi m V 01 Of O� O W 1 N .< m Oe m T O O YI W L M P iA A A O a s Cn W O W cA cA 0 0 W V W V p 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O T I<A O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O D O O o n o 0 0 O O O O o 0 0 o c o 0 0 o o O o O p O i0 • O r ro N P 7i G d <T 0• V N Ln N N cf m V+ O m A G 7 m •. A <:) O W A <A O O w �{ W v C O O Pp Gn C O 0 0 0 0 O C A r �� O O G v O <p O O O p 0 0 0 0 -• O O O G O O O cI n C O J O v 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O J O O O O O Z' C D M .J .fl z r N T -i rn 0 T i.+ O �c <�rl V 00 0000 0000 0000000 ocoo o c v D D m i 33 b o CIS r rn Z 0 D c O O o n o t� 0 0 0 o c o o 0 0 o c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 O N z Z ;o >O Z C1 u > C CA O m 1 m 3 v� m rt1 0 p 2 V� i C� m -� t. c.� n. cA -• -• m �+ N v+ N rn N tNO rn o o w z n� -� t� m O m) = Z IJ Ol -� to U. J• O W N �J m <h m Ol O O N r- N Ql {.!1 O Ol A .n m 0• :. 1• Q4 LI r•l to Ln V1 O O W V v J O O O O !!1 O O O O O O O --- m C1 C O m (A n r> Ci u— n 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 fs <l — n O O O O O U O m O Ci Cl u G G u 0 0 0 0 O O O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O :] O O i N Z C: W O N n n C•J <� v n C� O O O O n f7 <•� n c> n c•+ c•• C. O 0 0 0 0 G A' c n ej D <� l:J u <� O o 0 0 o O O P 0 6 0 0 �� 0 0 0 0 0 0 G A 0 O D b ? z x rn T O C O c c c . . 0 0 0 O O U O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G = O ZIP I O O c:.. u o 0 0 O O O Ca O O O ri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n 0 0 G v D D m i 33 b o CIS r rn Z 0 D c O O o n o t� 0 0 0 o c o o 0 0 o c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 O N z Z ;o >O Z C1 u > C CA O m 1 m 3 v� m rt1 0 p 2 V� i C� m -� t. c.� n. cA -• -• m �+ N v+ N rn N tNO rn o o w z n� -� t� m O m) = Z IJ Ol -� to U. J• O W N �J m <h m Ol O O N r- N Ql {.!1 O Ol A .n m 0• :. 1• Q4 LI r•l to Ln V1 O O W V v J O O O O !!1 O O O O O O O --- m C1 C O m (A n r> Ci u— n 0 0 0 0 J 0 0 0 0 0 fs <l — n O O O O O U O m O Ci Cl u G G u 0 0 0 0 O O O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O :] O O i N Z C: W O N n n C•J <� v n C� O O O O n f7 <•� n c> n c•+ c•• C. O 0 0 0 0 G A' c n ej D <� l:J u <� O o 0 0 o O O P 0 6 0 0 �� 0 0 0 0 0 0 G A 0 O D b ? z x rn T O C O c c c . . 0 0 0 O O U O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G = O ZIP I O O c:.. u o 0 0 O O O Ca O O O ri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n 0 0 G O ZIP I O O c:.. u o 0 0 O O O Ca O O O ri 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n 0 0 G 'OCT -17 -2000 TUE 05;54 PM FAX NO. X a .c b m m m m V V v OA 21 t.) Ci "44 p A' cos r C) V �• m a b. 3 a s �. p D w o •. r a c r. C M a i ma A = a C p i,3mi G Jf O z p ,� H N D c D T 3 F' a — O m to O O .O cu [.1 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 3 ; O O V O m 0 0 0 0 to O O O O O O O O O A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m m 5 In b to P. I MB gymm. A A S m 0� p D o N w � O z � n O �p � ZIP Ic) O c) -7 V, 0000 0000 0 00 0o vo000 000 > m "44 + � � rOC C) V N O OI V J co m O o o N w 0 0 W CA W Im O O A A O Y W C, iA m m w o m O O .O cu [.1 O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 V 10 O+ O O V O m 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -W * +_ ti v ' 0 u, rn c� v a°i s o urn o cA m cA , o N i'r < m Ca i� C7 n N V n C, w to cc CA O O a to O d CJ �n m m L3 0 _ C % O G O J J <+ n V+ U o O O O O Cp V O cu O O O U C, .A C7 O Z O O o a O O 0 0 0 0 0 O <� c'., r O 7 _ y i.1 'o m n . O O O r.; q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O f1 O 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 O a D 2 m rn 7_o --4i -D1 C r r Ao o mm T n p M Ch . D D C O O O u 0 O O O o O O O O O O O 00 0 0 0 0 0 O 'C H O Z Z Z n z o m m N U + C m D Z N O) N �• O Q, V m S a O W a• O (A m L" O) ti W W m W O O N LA N ..a N+ to tJ cn m -4 r = (n �•+ O i-± C n i.) u C, C , c.a CA m iT 0 p 's a o a 2a o CA Cw [n ip o = m � C o .n U. u, O O O g 0 n n cn J V .n C, + 0 S O v o 0o 0 0 0 0 0 0— n O m m v 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0 C. 0 C. U U Z N � o � j O N � 0 O G u U U o o p o O 0 0 0 G G O O c] O v ' O cc D 11 4! N O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o 0 C7 O 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .? O 2 m � ZIP Ic) O c) -7 V, 0000 0000 0 00 0o vo000 000 OCT -17 -2000 TUE 05.54 PM FAX N01 P. i2Jla i o sD ro so sD f� � Y �: fn (� Y C7 T •O C1 r' -� T � m � ?? A � � n 3 Z $ T A 'O :1 °� H D A � ?! (� =' � D Q A � T1 f! Q m co w T m "' 25 co N S r C m N S C S hr.r Tl 0 Q A r'l N' `° N w �. r W N X �, N m _ �Z CA N C Iv o N �• To•'lo o C.�o Z N G1 m V —n n i t N. W ri N O N S 7 2 7 T r D O C% O O w 0 m V V {.1 V 4/ Y m O C7 m m Q n N ID i• N ry m C. N o N O c r r o p p 0 0 0 m N •a• A tJ r+ O O O O 0 0 0 0 — LA Ln �' N N O O 6 O O ID O V m z ' ° a rn m c> O N a ? N m fl D _ mn. 4si v 3 rzm- � � 9 N CIl ti m -+ r N N �• N m D rT H N O 01 V w N tU V 0 ry 01 N C OO p p w 0 O) ti V w V w Ql Of O U ID A I m o N rn 01 (D W W 00 Cl O U a p0 cc 0 A Q O M r n c i .-> n C+1 O O J+ C. Cn O O 0 0 to O Ca m CD L 00 0 O O z�D ZIW O n t0 Q! A A SS m m W i0 �c O Z O y D� A m roc? J + N N J N C C m V m N D O C% O O w 0 m V V {.1 V 4/ Y m O In • N T ID N w U a W O m C p p 0 0 0 m N •a• A tJ r+ O O O O 0 0 0 0 O m o O m o O O- O P O C. 0 O O O G O O 6 O O ID O V y tip O •1 v 3 � � � 9 N CIl J. L N r r N N .+ w A 0 -+ r N N �• N m S V Cn i.i [J1 (.•1 .. w t m N 0 N O 01 V w N tU V 01 N C OO p p w 0 O) ti V w V w Ql Of O U ID A I m o N rn 01 (D W W 00 Cl O U a p0 cc 0 Q O r n c i .-> n C+1 O O J+ C. Cn O O 0 0 to O Ca m CD L 00 0 O cc O Z C 6 cJ c.. b t. J O C = r N •o m m N m v 9 rQ to 00000000000 0ocwi o 000 0 oomo 000 v D v-- y s y O W M M 0 o m m m 0 n 1 0 0 17) o c 0 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. o C, o Z Z Z oyZr _ to -+ O mac.. Z: N !C� V T rn r m m KI dD N O O 1 O Q c7 C7 f a O 01 V V w N O m V V w a 01 V + O %D A J. N + V1 07 w C7f <O N W L7• a T m 0 C O CC �+ c" 1 O •Cl> A r• CO U` r A W C Z O .. U V r ID O V V— 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0. 0 O U. G 01 C� O w 0 0 0 m O 0 0 0 •7 G O m n = o _ L7 w O N PA ! O 3 11 iv O D U n n n n n n O pp p n O CC. . a O : NNCa o p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 Co C C� C 1 O $ all O O D _ A T Z i O n Ca r 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 O O O O C7 0 0 O O O O O O Ca C. .` m Ln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 O 0 0 V O O o o O . OCT -17 -2000 TUE 05;55 PM FAX NO. �, AIM6 ut Q S rD to T 'j ^' f% m•2r m- c^ R 0 =t $ a C c T N N N [C C 0 N N N -• C C Q 1 .� Y O m w Y O rte. ii 7 � .�•r .~i .Ni �2� 3���$iiiFawes�m�4 ���iao;,Dnm�y y a;> ) h ro y a�:aN D.a00 o o Ct(7p3 x_25 g 52 Gt n m 7 m < Lot ^I n m o M o o£i r Y d>> D }n w w 0 G a 0 ' y o c 0 d; a U '� o ++ N _ -+ + N 2 O N m N H 4. N N N O w" 0 Z Y w, " A 10 N m V N S o m r �. o h o O O O O O O O b b n m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 ro °o be o °o °o °o °o o° o o° o °0 00 °o °o °o °o °o °o °o o °o 1 C a z as 0 11 y < r- c h N pp O ++ N _ -+ + N N J ... N _ J N + N C 4. N N N O w" 0 Z Y w, " A 10 N m V N S O m V A m N N m m r o O V O O O O O O O b b O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m °o be o °o °o °o °o o° o o° o °0 00 °o °o °o °o °o °o °o o °o — m 3 h 0 N ! ri -• + N + N N+ N N+ N m T O 4 M1 N N N C7 V Vt O, V A m N N¢ p < J CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t"+ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c� r� rn o v c• p 0 CV o o G O O G O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C. O n 0 0 0 O 0 o 0 0 o H o D O J O Cl U c.D U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n Z C 0 � 9 S r m ma m 0 0 cn n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 yrm„ CpCC 000 flit Mann O r r z <e c.r, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < ZZz o D O z C h u �Di o m m CA O O -.4 v y D O M Dry m D = s• ,+ N + N N+ r N N+ + N '� -G -.� n Cs r• n n f� 0 0 C C O O C o g n c�++ n 0 0 0 C C C O — m ci C O m U u J p v O 0 0 0 0 0 G G O b c) h O O O O V tS U U o J O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C O N n C� h J 6 u c• c:.v c.� c «7 G 0 0 0 O O G O U v n q a 0 O O O O �'i 0 0 p A Cl .0 o :� ..• ;a ;. n u �' . .� i• 2• 3� b• E4 �Y . o= r : e ." e� o • O O D _ h T b z Z z y h = m C1 :3 U O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O G O O O o O n O O O D '' i 0 G m O O O G O c7 O A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cl O n bCT -17 -2000 TUE 05;55 PM FAX NQ, P, W18 f/i T n C7 T N T C'7 T T A 4 g c nc)c7ncno --go0F c��_c c ��_ c l7 [f � (nCm o m« o aa� Cm a m ag Gy1 G) a � S � c i'l- a « ° � ° � aZ• 3f �` a• a ??_ -1 a� $$c m m c -ai -� G' ac-. a a; °: r~- -a a '0 z m Nb b i m '0= CA fn to ? i9 q� m ti 7 ti ? C N a�i rn m d N m 7 P C 7* m PT' C _ ] 0 d = 0 N r. O O � Z t rm p ![ 7C D � ow a w 0 tD O N O V O o ul �l O r li N O w p N V Op C�bp w cn O O W Lm v O tH 0 W O U O O V OO N cn % 8 0 0 0 0$ U O O O O N O 0 C 0 cat O O O O O C', n c l +� C n G U O U O O O O O O u U E 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 O O C.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -4 ; 9 z r- 4 M m M 0 w i.l C O C+ 4 b 0 0 0 0 O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 CDC 0 0 0 0 0 0 t7 b D a 0, CA m a O Z 9 000U) m0 7o -lyZ�� �00 0 O r. c'l 0 0 M O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O o 0 O r r z Z Z Z u a 0 C O z A u�i m C o m m m m :J ... Ul C1 Ol t0 a n v N Op N �! to Cf t.N T m r p m n O i. w �•, . N r m al Ct O N J n cc O v (A O O l.e N -I o 0 r'J v 0 L" 0 0 0 00 0 C D m G y v, c> n O O O O O O o n n g O O O O O N n v n O p C O O r: p u u o O O O O ci G C. V O 0 0 0 0 0 0 t^ O O V U O o 0 0 0 0 0 G 0 3 Y D N < C � O 0 0 0 0 0 [� v n 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ci ee O c�i n 0 0 0 0 0 0 C-D 0 00 0 go u C� O O G O O G U 0 o O O O O O O G u 0 ci U O O C� 0 0 0 0 0 0 (� N LY " c u a 2= - 3� o ii u e o T r3Y= u° o•' S J • • ''° C0') O oa s b Z Z = �n O G U G U O O G O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O p O 0 0 0 0 G 0 = m m o D _ G) 0 o a o c•r� o o u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m n <z .. G G G O O Q O u .+ A a v ur :w N Cl O G C C 0 G O C el M N+ to low V N O a O t0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 uA 0 0 0 0 _ N t.+ N in m 41 V N O ►a M N m rn 0 0 CA 0 0 0 0 0 0 m C C C1 m r m 0 D � ow a w 0 tD O N O V O o ul �l O r li N O w p N V Op C�bp w cn O O W Lm v O tH 0 W O U O O V OO N cn % 8 0 0 0 0$ U O O O O N O 0 C 0 cat O O O O O C', n c l +� C n G U O U O O O O O O u U E 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 O O C.) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -4 ; 9 z r- 4 M m M 0 w i.l C O C+ 4 b 0 0 0 0 O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 CDC 0 0 0 0 0 0 t7 b D a 0, CA m a O Z 9 000U) m0 7o -lyZ�� �00 0 O r. c'l 0 0 M O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O o 0 O r r z Z Z Z u a 0 C O z A u�i m C o m m m m :J ... Ul C1 Ol t0 a n v N Op N �! to Cf t.N T m r p m n O i. w �•, . N r m al Ct O N J n cc O v (A O O l.e N -I o 0 r'J v 0 L" 0 0 0 00 0 C D m G y v, c> n O O O O O O o n n g O O O O O N n v n O p C O O r: p u u o O O O O ci G C. V O 0 0 0 0 0 0 t^ O O V U O o 0 0 0 0 0 G 0 3 Y D N < C � O 0 0 0 0 0 [� v n 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ci ee O c�i n 0 0 0 0 0 0 C-D 0 00 0 go u C� O O G O O G U 0 o O O O O O O G u 0 ci U O O C� 0 0 0 0 0 0 (� N LY " c u a 2= - 3� o ii u e o T r3Y= u° o•' S J • • ''° C0') O oa s b Z Z = �n O G U G U O O G O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O p O 0 0 0 0 G 0 = m m o D _ G) 0 o a o c•r� o o u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m OCT -17 -2000 TUE 05:55 PM FAX NO. O M D rn � C7 � f7 Cl Q C'f C7 m O_ O O A y N ro A to [o O_ O O O O_ O_ W c0 N O t9 a. r. c � Z .� � � it � •� m to to Vi to Vi Cn N N O O O O O O ... _ •. •.. N � F" � C. L f9 fD N N N t9 @ w a z m w n� y P w m L u u m m n v v-'Sv7R fnCCn1' �1 fn} 1 ua Y- y N r -1 r y ^ y c Z n^ a m o r, r, :. i Q to m c a 0 - 0 3 3 a m t a d D T 7 -• a m C ^ m f0 d ^ C 1.. m �. o vvm.vN n �Dm ao" IOw S T N p 'Z m rL � •• i it � 7 O d o) T yr O ri. x N )p. o n N a N U N d .� A r -+ N.► N V J♦ .+ J a N cn W a+ 10 Y L -+ N C Q N 4 V O O O O O O a W O O O LJ V V O N U O N OI V lJ1 O Q N N O O O O S S O LA 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lb 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn W O S N M O O cJ U v r1% �O O r a Gn LI, -+ U tJ, Cal Q, tJ � -� i Y m U V -- 10 O ID N Y 10 m Ol W O V fl1 N �. L Qj V U. C -N•. O � m ...� 7) it O U N . 10 H> + c! m N f a, 10 N to N .4 10 4+ V L.g P O U '7 V N O O, W O N 0 P_: 0 0 . (� 0 �1 G O I V O V O O C> n N Ln f•1 N L•.9 O V f n 0 O °, N N Y 6 N V 0 V O ZCAO 0oao.- d 0 C,C UU C,QC,00Lnao000n'Aa00L" ncnocC0 0 Lr = r H M m 6 1. rn 1 (: �o 0 0 o c o 0 0 o n ono 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o c o 0 0 0 0 0 I-,;) C, C: O O O c C O C O O O O C O O O O O C O 0 O O C O 0 0 0 0 0 rJ C O c p O Ln •Y� co LC N m N V 1L> W t.) � J c. cl O J N c T V O Cn O C7) ­4 �4 C p 2 p N F. pp U O) U C1 f� M N N V O O Cn O O O C O O N G Ca U 0 P U CJ O In O O O O C) 0 0 0 m H a m D O Z -4 H -4 p0Amy'� m Z o c 1 H O 1 H O O -1 � 1 c 0 A= 9 0 m D m v m D T m v r m O v U1 n Qv•` c• � u • c .. r. cy: cu ,u irk v ,Sr obu .€u +a � • • Sih git Ei �o` ao` cd�• �e` >'j �te pn R 0 cG-, � cZY a a c� zciv� > Jc, ` °yi 4o io .• °` o�oo o n !e O A T_ Z7 Z H m 0 C•, C. r? r,) rJ Cl C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 O Z c A z n O O c> O O U C.> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O m P. 15/16 m tmo A S =. 00 m m Z Z W m r C O ? � n D n Q 3 b M b D D Z m v m 070�� `m Z z z O O Z 2 C. m < m ° m c .. = Z D m 3 N � O O 0 O OCT -17 -2000 TUE 05:55 PM I. 0000 000 ;s6 6 rA r-nvro•o rrom7 -C -V v -0 mvvv -0 17TH r nOOOC)C-)0 c) c) C-1 C)03p, 0000000000C)•Io O O O O O 0 O C) 0 O U 0 x O O O O O 00 O O O ova y 0 w W W W N N N N N N (v N ..� .+ + ..� .� O N) W Io 0 V— w .1 01 CA 1. w co �( m C)1 A W N r� N S C3 Q m u N+ r 27 �: 7 (n p n f) O D O j 2 m 0 N m :J i' m D Z C) to .p_ < r T m 0 0 0 Z m m m N D® M d 3 41 (1 o © D i, O 0 F y rn y m q -C-I z N 2 y 0 0 a DAm�431 m ~ nm�� Yin =Mrr-- 0X�ZO< 0 gnnz I2o� °° rn�' c"ic"�rc'�n�DZrrn Inz rttU�'mNmwC)Z-0r -M0 -4 j5 rzz t��nzmr-0A0 „ ^MrDO5tipz -m lo o -yzcm Ap0C'$m` �io���� nc. C is �mr 1 �Mmc�zi O -4 v) C I�PDD -INN �m o z (A`� n� ?ACA z 1 =,020 n m0. -Irr- c u o Z i to `= I 0 r 01 to ..► lC N W U N N W C,) 01 CJD V co ► O f� t. 0 0. 0o N (L 4 VLy, W C) N Cp C.1 P C>o -4 u+ W w •:, O: l/I -.. J UI O V a (n cj N w O) W W Ol 011 �I A m W V N .+ lD C:I Cn U) V N m 0 (O W n !>• A O M j j N o A : A 0 0 0 Oe N ib L coil v t. n C O O 0) N C' V w n IV 10 W Ci Gl V O VI CA r N 0 .II tC r '•n O` U, -. O L ti v f. (JI n N U'm W w O Ol V o W W O N O s. .O t, to -f f.J 0 U cn � '0.2 m Cl :I N co to CO W L A L w M 0 V O 10 O O o c, C, O O O O O O O O O O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co M 0 0 0 :] O O C O O O O O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p O Gi N N N Vl (/t Cn w n Cf (n N vf. V VI •/i ^ VI u7 (/. N CI Z. V W to 41 W C CT N I N w _.•. ) U c..: �:1 O) Cn �1 Co Z. 0 A N� A 0 0 0 b N Lb t 1. `. -. U .'> m O � . W m J O Cn fI + w) : 6, V (n O N C7) W O W V d W C, �j O C7 (JI (o O O') Qf V N Oe m I i -n , or, oa n oO ct� - G > a cC.r 00 c 0cC,) 00 000 , ) onrfn U 0 0 0 0 i� O C) O O Gp. U Co C O �` � Y • Q' u Y O � C•� � v .. Y � O �� I� L� 4 • �y O'` QO�' � � U i.� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G FAX NO. c ;a c 9 a a m N m v m m o iL y d W O£i .0 u7 n m m y A M N � N m 9 � m w [D Vf 0 c O m O N s CD m g w O 0 Co • m E n m � rn n >m (JD O to W V J CT m r V O O m CT m co O m PIP 4 gS0Soo ° A V O 0 r a n v -4 o O 0 v C Z C O r m 1 M o ^' N a 0 m e o 0 0 o c o d 9 i � M C-4 2 m A z m = D 0 r 00 O O O O O O { N A + O { D 9 p m 0 m Z r- 1 �) CM v �. f• D O m D m m0 -y r m C11 °o o d O O O^ O C U C� e eP e a Q a ell d° O ;co ; Z Z = O O O O O O C O = .1 10 O 0 O (: Cl n 0 0 O Q) b o p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0l 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 P. 16/16 a°� mm i Y D m m z z VI H r C O Z n v � D a r . cl te a -i Ozaa D O Z o D a C co < m m -4 2 S = m 31 ` 3 N D { C, pq u o N J O OCT -17 -2000 TUE 05:56 PM FAX N0. F. 17/16 Z 0 0 0 00 0 O m V - vM- OMvvmmTmmTm-0t'��v„�v o v��vvv��v�vv n�vv� C) C) C) 0 C) C) 0 C'30 C) n cf C') n C)�! 0 0 0 0 0 C) O O O O 0 O 0 O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 0 O () m 4 t V V "CIS- 10 W v. (� 4> L7 f.. u O O a ti DI C. W -4 a+' O -I N O= V N N -• N C• V N N C' OI m -f Of L C) .. G M (.n m 0 m T T (� ' x m b D S T .I r CA O pp m��� -' CA U� Z xs•r - u c;jj -n CJTC)mNmx n.17�v�mZ!n o-4M X a °on- m O O p ;u r• rn m X r) m r S In m> D C3 ;U '!.. ? p X r M G O ;n 3' ._ r' O O p Q X< -1 r- r Z m m p O z z 0+ -1 0 O 0� Q C m w> C O ac r. � m oN �U� D O C �pOm� � ��C)C�coC7 tcl.p(n �n�fn�o> co Dpi Q �6M ��mm-1- nC)mD):.M Z - IC)z...CC? T z r -4O mrn n1 Z TC.>i1� -�V z'n (�+ >Cn7TacoQ��npN;1� mp M ONrU �zm �yozo <r�zzc)m?� -nrn en D �n��1>Om'``_ °p' O '9 r.i Cn D CA C y 71 O m m G7 N C) n m r r ?i T O 1J O [) O r rtl O Z r- 1 O •� N CJ CD ►rmn �y7 r CA 1 T n C Z y M �D7 .Z) Z -4 3- Cn CA z > D CA ff, M in .o En N 1 7) 7C > -4 T M p m tl O Q N m X O tOi, x °' ° -r 1 C) CA x O r(��? ogTm�� ��- -Y+0�� -4 rn'M 7- ZWnZm ?� °�-- 4zzzzn m a, r a m ? 7 C) M 0n m O 3, M n T m C, y C) 0 p� C? O G) m O y n S C) Z7 v --.4 O TI 7C m n Z Oz ti A© Z r D Z Vmj Cn O Z n7orwnnm co r, Z =�M rtlmG7mAZ y00 : :E e- 7,� Tl O v N M n l M G) O x Y A -+ C) i z x m D x Y C rn ' cn m m -4 a C07 o "� 7_ Vi m cn a O 2 m v M rA O T N Y. -• W VI tD .+ -+ N A V V N !O ki N V Q, w N 4i O _ O A i m fD p- .91) !_1 M m N s. n l.. -• -. L N .+ O Cn (., iV N O W CA N O ['+ N L7! N N O M O M O v O, U O c.n CA i (.!1 U1 m O O O V U. C ( O N y 0 Vt N C71 K> O �• Ol (., N — NJ P h O („) V• •O N N V QI lD N J O_ _ O A A (J i m W T .� N O W tU,�1 Ln O O N M N N 0 T O M� O V W Lt O Vt M O O 7C A) Cn L QI V .+ U v [e U) C] C'! W G C V LA O W m O. C (7 0 0 0 0 U C! h 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V. M (n Ch a CV (D N U V V �' O O U O V• N 1D O O V Z C O 2 r 4 M M M O tG N L l= !� L n. r O V• Y N m L f- N U. C^ C'. o m c. tD N C Ul O L, W W— O cn N W W.9 CA D O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O C O C C O C C, O v � n ° Z 1 rn -4 0 0 A m M T m Z Mo O CG O O C) 17, O O C� Cn n O G O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cn n o a vi i.1 in H Cn cn <n m D M o r D N fn N rn _ (A (A ul V. V. N iA v U ( o w In V. Cn cn to cn N N (/1 V. Cn W 41 - + - m � �. N V• f. -a (,� •n V. V/ O cn N L V H V U N O N ++ N r.) DI 1D (.n W O (fs fl. C7 !. J. Q. (D N O. V = M C N f. in �� -• yy w7 -+ O UI V N N C7 w U (A O O N CT N N O W O 01 C7 M Ca 4- f. U. w ['. O )+ R. L .J N O .<i N N j. C -J O V W cn O -• u to O o r K O 0. (n m n O O C cn N fA W G m D. i u d 61 C" L 0 {D Ut Cn W V V O V+ O O N O �D O G� J O ry O a7 •"'+ 11 C-. C'i 0 0 0 8 O O O O A c C') C? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G n Cc C1 n r+ O G 0 0 0 U ... Ca Cn C' O R O o G d c: Ca v 0 0 r? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C:. O Cv O C� Cf O C' O O O n ? O Q O Z m a z y 0 x M C-d C1, C? O O Co O O CU O CU O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C CU O 5 J i ii v � vv N N O z Iff C) a a > TI v�aal O ?1 v v M C111 O 2 Z D O z m D i d < m m J � � = 2 M C a T D w' 0 0 O O C O O O O c o Cl C7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C7 O o O O O O O O O o o O O O O O O O O U O I 1 1 Jp l �J�.J � OCT -17 -2000 TUE 05:56 PM FAX N0, F. I8/28 V D ofn 0o m on s zzz00000 xx C7nf7 x 00 non GTf l� N c C m < A m C D O O r =nN CC cl O2 ramp yCrvvi v v� r < ti { S ` O > > � rn O pp r' 0— G) r- > z c7 O z cn n N N O 3 -4n m V p O c a rt� C) r 0 m m O > T C7 4 O N T NJ N M+ O n < o 1V U a tp m C n 00-0 ro�i<o�wv me r- D o c i. m �. - m 66 O, O D U O N as � o ror � o m C ro e 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 c O S r y 4 °mm m •r N i 0 u, OAi P v m`�'�o L4 '0 O C. W p p - -(aX> 0p9� o00Nm mpc�n o RI Z N may' °o oaoOCOOCO oc <<^ 2 Oz22 Go > o -+v� O mjma in N N N v A can V, H+ D O m a m = j j O U to V Oi t0 OD u W C r r m a m u i] C7 h N N W V 0 iC v n n !n `9, o = m v C C o d m m a c v v v v o° a D P4 i v O O D U G p O O O$ Gp O N O O o a A T c zx of C1 o O O o o O o O o o p O T m 0 := D cp M O C J g O m -+ O O O G O O O O C O p r J CHANGE ORDER Contractor's Job Number — 9858 t r PROJECT: Palm Beach Gardens Municipal Complex City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 TO CONTRACTOR- Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. 3801 PGA Blvd., Suite 1002 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 OWNER ■ ARCHITECT ■ CONTRACTOR ■ OTHER ■ CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: lOR DATE: January 28, 2000 ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO: 562- 96/2.21 CONTRACT DATE: June 15, 1998 CONTRACT FOR: Renovations/New Municipal CpIx. The Contract is changed as follows: Change Orders Number 10, 11, and 12 are voided. Funish all labor, equipment, inataub, and supervision for the followmg work PCO 482 NuiVilvanized interior door frames for Police station and City Hall.._ .............. ........ . ................................. ............................... ................. (S 3.296.00) POO #93 Deletion ofou c wall and Door tile in Room 235. ............_........_..__..__._.__............_..._......................................... ............................... (S 4 ,318.00) PCO 4128 Credit for Pond Fountain .................._....._._.. ............. _........_............ _................._.............._..._................... ............... .... (S 2.500.00) Credits ($ 10,114.00) P00:105 Remove north wall of Files/StorW 134 ............................................................................................................................. ............................... S 1.023.00 POO :106 City Hall Roam 127A — Chore North Wall Deletion.. . ........... .................................... ............................................................................... S 198.00 PCO 0109 Required fistuam mounts in Police Station ..................... ................ . ......... -- ............................................... ........................ ............................... S 1.142.00 PCO :111 Relocation of scam keepers beaus and eooduits to new location at hall fields ................................................................... ............................... S 9.266.00 POO 112 installation of additional chase per RFl # 422 ...................................................................................................................... ............................... S 440.00 POO 0130 Revised Finish Schedule by Staan Badit- ......................................... ...... ..... ................ -- . _......................................... ............................... S 13.101.00 P00:131 Per PR 027. to delete aeamd concrete a 3 eras per drawing fim Ray Casto. ....... ---- ................................................... ............................... S 103.00 PC0:133 Revised Trwch Dram System to a Fiberglass Drain, radius piers with PVC grating ....................... ......... ................. ................................. S 3.6.00 PCO:134 Field modi5ation to platform rails in Police station ........ ............................... .............................................................. ............................... $ 1053.00 PCO 136 Addition of GFl devices to light poles in the Plm ....................... ....- .............. ................................... ........................ .............. ............ ............ S 4.142.00 PCO 0137 Imtall two addtianal bollards to protect teloosted fire sprinkles rises...........--- ............................................................. ............................... S 44700 PCO #138 Relocate door to Evidence office :144 into Evidence Prep. : 143 .......... ............................................................. — .............................. ............ S 2.285.00 PCO:142 Imaall Fie Sprmkla hells under the overhead doors m the F.S. Apperst s Bay ...................... .................................. ............................... $ 3.993.00 PCO 44 Request for additional plywood for tekphooe backer board m the Police Sntioa ............._ ..................................................................... S 3.166.00 PCO :146 Varian electrical rhnges in Police station and City Hall ............................... ............................... ........ ............................... ............................ S 18.401.00 Cantor S 62,123.00 Not valid until signed by the Owner, Architect and Contractor. Original Contract Sum was ....................................................... ............................... S 13,132,520.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ................. ............................... S (1,877,569.00) The Contract Sum prior to this Change Order was .................... ............................... $ 11,254,951.00 The Contract Sum will be changed by this Change Order in the amount of .............. S 52,009.00 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be ..... ............................... $ 11,306,960.00 The contract time will be (ineFeesed) (deeteased) (UNCHANGED) by ..................... 0 days Date of Substantial Completion (isged te), (remains the same) ......................... February 10, 2000 NOTE: This attnmary does not refloct changes in the Contract Sum, Convad Time or Guaranteed Maxmu= Price, which have been authorized by Consbuction Change Dirwiive. Architects Design Group, Inc. ARCHITECT 333 N. Knowles Avenue Addiaaa Winter Park, FL 32789 By evin tigan, President D O/ Suffolk Construction Company CONTRACTOR 3801 PGA Blvd., Suite 1002 Addrm Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 By Date AIA Decumust G"I a Chge order a 1997 EDMON a AIAO.01917 EDMON a City of Palm Beach Gardens OWNER 10500 N. Military Trail Addren Palm Bep4 Gardens, FL 33410-4698 By Date SALES TAX SAVINGS CHANGE GIRDER Contractor's Jas Number -9858 PROJECT: Palm Beach Gardens Municipal Complex 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 TO CONTRACTOR: Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. 3801 PGA Blvd., Suite 1002 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 The Contract is changed as OWNER ■ ARCHI'T'ECT ■ CONTRACTOR ■ OTHER ■ CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: S.T.S. CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: DATE: ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO: CONTRACT DATE: 11R 3 January 28, 2000 562- 96/2.21 June 15, 1998 CONTRACT FOR: Renovations/New Municipal Complex Reduction of Contract Amount to facilitate the Sales Tax Savings Procedure in the purchase of materials for the construction of the above designated project. Contractor's Project #9858 Purchase of materials in this manner in no way relieves the Contractor of any of his Contractual Obligations as defined in the Contract Documents for this project. To include, but not be limited to: Material procurement, quality, quantity, scheduling, fabrication, handling, installation, protection and warranty. SOURCE: See Attached List PURCHASE ORDER # N/A Not valid until signed by the Owner, Architect and Contractor. Tax Savings Amt. Original Contract Sum was .................................................. ............................... $ 13,132,520.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ........... ............................... S (1,825,560.00) The Contract Sum through Change Order #10R was ............ ............................... S 11,306,960.00 The Contract Sum will be changed by this Change Order in the amount of ......... S (919,714.88) $ 52,059.34 The new Contract Sum including this Change Order will be ............................... $ 10,387,246.12 Total Tax Savings, to date, including this Change Order .......................................... ............................... $ 162,181.95 The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order is UNCHANGED and is: 2 -10-00 NOTE: This summary does nest refled changes m the Conrad Sum, comnd Time or Guaranteed Maxmwm Price, vrhich have been authorized by Cow"c iea Chaage Directive. Architects Design Group, Inc. ARCHITECT 333 N. Knowks Avemse Adds Whda Pa& FWn& 327119 Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. CONTRACTOR 3801 PGA Blvd., Suite 1002 Addre: Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 0 City of Palm Beach Gardens OWNER 10500 N. Military Trail Addy Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 DM ��� � Date Date d su. Domom atom • Qwp ordv • t9t7ItDMON • MA to • o IM EDMON • C.rycFPr- LmEG-Gr =RDENS PACE 03 BE:- 14-900 Tat ! :29 AM A4 HC. FAZ H0. 407 6, .525 P. L �Lii1994 t % :ob �6i :.alal23 C:rvCFPALNS�A�IS 3 PAM AZ '. 5:7>tYL`I.IC CC�fYTRLiC:20lf at{FA)47 10500 B. NZLMRT TRAIL PM24 MUN WADM , FL 3 3 410 361 -991 -9673 Proposed Change Order •CAN% D=CCT FOR !ALBS TAX SAv7zNGS P"I Drs j e c C : PALM BXACH GARD=S NCLiI CI PAL CONPLF.X Job: $954 Z2 I'Y CP VAZX BrACM e2agn=s �61 14 10 S Oa XCRTY NILITMT TRAIT. 1999 PAZX saAcsr GARDENS, TL 33410 FTvaa vendor 3CC104 Iiz Reterance To / / started. Campleted, ZS A DMCTION MN TUt 3-,JFTCLX CCT ION CD "T2ACT MR TME—SAUS TCAX SAVINGS PROCIBAM IKPL1 MW= BY ?Sit CITY OF PALM BEACH GAR EM. THIS TA=a == ACCOUtf. ALL PAYZI NTS XAnX BY THI =IT TO V=ORS TRAOOM o '99. n 30 SEX ATTACH= SPEADSHZZ T FOR LIST OF PCRC3AS8 ORDERS Alta PAYM�= T= CITY FMS PAID zxv ZCXS TOTALnVG ............... .......s 2,703,032, 3 MZ aAL83 TAX rcR T =SE srt mIc38 ........r .................. s 3 162J )►1, �5 I q�1,50 p� LB:SS ?AIOR DBDCCTIONB FOR P1lYKCffS AM 27UC S7IVZHCL4 ........ S TOTAL DBMC=ION TO TRX CONTRAC ... :........................ \ ^ ' --qjj Cost: r f By. CITY O .L' !1 Byi '- ..ate: JUN 2 3 Kn. ' )IC-IC-99 F?I } :-.., 59.77-1023 ?• 3 • .?, .a, _ __ _ -, _z 56177E-- ITYGFPaL4HC K-a RDE' " Oksd Palen ms to Suflcik Sapgeecs - 12114" 1996 Bond issue Data Vendor O"Ovlion Amount Acct 0 0925196 Arnehcan Concrete Ind. Sewer and Drainage Supplies =15.098.00 20.6200 _ 10108/96 Masco Lighting BalMeld Ught Strucxrre Syszer, $289.900.00 ZO -2021 20-6200 10/23/98 V.S_Concrete Plpe Concrete Ice $38.052.24 20 -202.1 20 -8200 10rZ3M Tarmac America Construction Supplies $9.255.84 20 -202.1 20 -6200 10/23/98 Arnerk w Concrete Ind. Sewer and Drainage SuppRea $12,595.00 20.6200 1 2388 U.S. Concrete Pipe Concrete 58,508.64 20-6= 11106198 CSR Rinker Concete Blocks 210,498.89 20 -8200 11/0688 Md4nsey Steel b supph Stock Materials 33.156.22 20 -8200 11/0688 Engltlaering Specialities Co. Hollow Metal $10,000.00 20 -6200 112085 CSR Rinker Concrete Blocks 320,340.20 20 -6200 112086 Hughes Supply Inc. 136.5 tons of Rabat $28,31279 20 -8200 1120196 Marlyn Steel Della Galvanized Oecx $9.066.70 204200 112088 McKinsey St" & Supply Stock Materials $8.257.08 2o-&= 112088 Tarmac America Construction Supplies S38249.00 20200 112085 Tarmac America Construction Supplies $11,416.00 2046200 1120198 U.S.F. Fabrication Fabricate & Deaver $4,495.00 20-6200 1120/96 Valley Joists 81.24 tone JolsZ $23.126.69 20.6200 112t>t95 Sabel Steel City Hail Material $8,5,8.63 20.6200 12!04/95 Delta Steel aty Hal Material 52,84454 20-0200 12/04!95 Delta Steel City Han Material .$2,005.85 204200 12104/96 U.S. Concrete Pipe Concrete Pipe 5580.00 20 -6200 1211&0 CSR Rinker Concrete Blocks $8,771.15 204200 12M885 CSR Rinker Concrete Mocks $41.715,46 20 -6200 12!15/95 Delta Steel Suppaft ' 520.61736 20 -8200 12MSM Delta Steel Supplies 519.904.53 204= 12MOM TannaicAmerics Construction Supplies $940.00 20 -15=1 12n8f9dTarmaeArnettes confection supplies 518,672410 20.6200 12118195 TarmwAmerica Conatruction Supplies S9,776J10 20-6200- Total 1998 Bond Issuance Costs 3631.512.22 - - 1997 Bond Issue Date Vendor Description Amount Aux. 9 1210486. MclGnsay Steel d Supply City Hall Embeds S4 ,70024 21.6200 12/15/96 McKhmey Steel & Supply DRAT 518,085.57 21 -6200 1213185 American Concrete Ind. Supplies 5985.00 21 -8200 01/14M Assoctated Air Products Construction Supplies S2 ,720.00 21.6200 01113189 /1/1/0/163 Supply Ina 136.5 tons of Rebar 529.15420 21-8=0 01/151W Merlyn Stall Decks Gakq nbmd Deck 5705.80 21.8200 01/15199 mcialu y Steel &supply Fire Station Materials S8 .137.96 21 -8200 01/15199 Tarmac America Construction suppaea S20,T40.00 21 -6200 01/15/99 Tarmac Anwica Construction supplies 525,946.00 21 200 01115199 U.S. Concrete Pipe Concrete Pipe 5434 -00 21 -8200 01/15199 Valley Joists Construction Supplies 582,123.52 21 -8200 01/15M valley Job" Furnish& deliver deck 515,1303.50 21-CM 01/15/99 Englneering Specialities Co. Furnish metal. /rood doors $10.000.00 21 400 O1n5/99 SoudW* tam Wire Supplies $75.880.02 21.8200 0111589 A ooduat HVAC Supplies 512,351.00 21-6= 01/15/99 CSR Rinker supplies 54454 21 -6200 01/15/99 CSR Rinker Concrete Bodes $8 ,569.00 21 -6200 01/29/99 CSR Rinker Construction Supplies $9.825.45 21 -6200 0129199 U.S. Concrete Pips Hanlrvae Supplies $483.00 21-6200 01128199 Erpinee Specialities Co. Hsrdrrae Supplies $8.700.00 21.6200 01/2989 Metal Mart Syata re HVAC Supoes $22.034.00 21 -8200 01/29/99 Associated Air Products Sprat Duct 55,550.00 114200 01/2989 York bternetloaW i1YAC Supplies $85.504.00 21 -6200 0129199 Bradco Supply Ca Roa ft & insulation $8.445.46 21.8200 01!29199 Bob Sinna d'l omy Landscapimp. Trees 54,828.35 214MW 012989 Marley Gardrra Trees $5.945.00 214MM 0129/99 6ac.%WW SuppNs Inc_ LW*V Fbdure Package $97,325.00 21 -6= 01/29/99 lbeTme C,armneclon WestminGtonlan Palms $8,075.00 21.6200 ?. 02112W Uatal AAert SVMwm HVAC Suq Acs 312.039.00 21 -6200 4 -ar` ,"?s 4:47 N 5E'77-3102", PAGE 04 $653.253.03 A - -° - ' - - -- 7. PACE 05 02112M Sectirad Su+p0m Inc 02!12M Landscape .md WMas 02112!99 Osprey Building Materials 01/12/99 York International 02/12199 Associated Air Products 02/12199 Leslie Industries Inc. 02111.199 Autoduct 0228/99 Electrical Supplies Inc 0228/99 The Tree Connection 02126/99 York International 0129/99 Tarmac America 02T28199 Ts+mec America 0226/99 Tarmse America 02r26M Hughes Supply Inc. 02128/89 Souis7eesterm Wire 02126199 CSR Rinker 02ltel99 CSR Rinker 0226/99 Tarmac America 03/12199 Hughes Supply Inc. 03M2199 Electrical Supplies Inc. 03/17/99 Metal Mart Systems 03/12/99 Autoduct 03/12199 Tarmac America 03112/99 Marian Gardens 03112/99 Osprey Bullding Materials 03/28/96 Osprey Building Materials 031213/99 Tarmac AmwIca t>3r18/68 Associated Air Products 03418A9 TarTmmsc America 04AO9199 AssoclaW Air Products 04/09/99 CSR Rkmker 04/09199 Tarmac America 041 ?.3199 Bradco Supply Corp 04/23P9A 9mi newbV SpeclMes CO. 04123199 Osprey BOildlrq Matwfals 0N27A9 Tarmac America 04123199 CSR Rinker . 04MM Electrical Supplies Inc. 08104199 Osprey BubdkV Materials ToW 1997 Bond Issuance Costs 1998 Bond Issue Date Vendor 03128199 Associated Air Products 03/28199 CSR Rinker 03/28/99 ElecWk:W Supplies Inc 04123199 Metal Mart Systems OSVM CSR Rinker 05106199 Osprey Building Materials 05!08199 Tarmac America 0521/99 Consdidsted Electric Supp1 05/21/99 Electrical Suppies•Inc. 05121/98 Metal Mart Systwns !3521/99 Pro Mack Suppy, 05/21/99 Osprey Building Materials 0521M Soulhesster VWe 08/034/69 American Concrete 08/04/96 CSR Rinker 081904/99 Electrical Supplies Inc, W04/99 Osprey Building Materials 06/04199 Tarmac America 05/18/96 Tarmac Alerka =_ 08118199 AssociaMd Air Plmdiuds , ' J )3. -1$ -9S n--- 4:4$ N Trees Canstruct!cn Supplies HVAC Supplies Spiral Duct Construction Supplies HVAC Supplies Ughting Supplies Landscaping HVAC Supplies Construction Supplies Construction Supplies Construction Supplies Construction Supplies Supplies Construction Supplies Construction Supplies Construction Supplies Construction Supplies Ughtine Supplies HVAC Supplies HVAC Supplies Construction Supplies Trees Constructlon Supplies Construction Supplies Construction Supplies Duct Supplies Construction Supplies Construction supplies Consbucoon Suppose Constnicilm Supplies Construdton SuppAee Conatrudon Suppose Furnish nrotai. woad doom Construction Supplies Construcdan supplies ConstnxillOn Supplies L1ghdrV Supplies Constriction Supplies Description Duct Supplies Construction Supplies Lighting Supplies GeNanized Ductwork Construcdon Supplies Construction Supplies Construction Supplies Electrical! Equipment Galvanized Ductwork Construction Supplies Construction Supplies Construction supplies Con3truc9011 Supplies Constr ucdon Supplies SupP11" Construction Supplies Conatrucew Suppim C.onstrucdon Supplies E"wgy Recovery shit EE.7731023 I $51,760.00 21.6200 $25,470.00 114200 W,715.11 21 -0200 $7,032.00 21 -6200 66,025.00 21 -6200 $52,827.3e 21.6200 $12.381.00 21 -8200 $1,800.00 21 -6200 $1,700.00 21-0200 $86,827.00 21 -0200 $16,455.00 21-0200 $9.061.00 21 -0200 $15,448.00 21-6200 $12,213.99 21 -0200 $19,818.11 21 -6200 $9.301.98 21 -6200 S99 -82 21 -8200 $8,04200 21 -6200 $997.50 21.6200 $37,500.00 21 -8200 $7.935.00 21 -8200 522.858.00. 21 -6200 $834.00 21 -6200 58,980.00 214MOO $941.64 21.8200 51233.98 214CM 55,590.00 21.8200 520,81100 21 41200 $5,148.00 21 -6200 $23A5S.00 2148200 51.133.73 2142D0 $8,092:1!2 2141200 $18,828:00 21.8200 S37.2062Z: 2148200 $6.825.00 21.8200 $8,211.82 214MOO S7,589A0 2148200 53.790.38 21-6= $800 -00 21 -6200 S2.783A3 214200 $1,137,175.38 Amount ACat * $ 10,312.00 224MM $1.70510 224MM $78.150.00 22 -6200 $16.842.00 22-0200 $1,983.40 22-a= 54,05828 22 -6zoo 55.790.00 224MOO $74,000.00 22-0200 $7.600.00 22 -0200 $10,350.00 2Z -0200 53,319.13 22 -0200 58.637.44 22-0200 59,83268 22—CM $3,540.00 22 -OM $2.290.83 22 -OM $6,000.00 22-02W $7,188.88 22 -6200 $7,147.00 M-BZOC $5,269.00 22 -6200 $6.310.00 22-0200 $1,887,308.48 $1,835.376.89 ?. 5 -- -- PAGE 06 06/18/89 CSR Rinker Construction Supplies $1,044.08 22 -6200 08118/M9 Osprey Building Materials Construction Supplies $8,119.03 Z2 -6200 06/18/99 Pro Made Supply Construction Supplies $3,634.06 22 -6200 08/18199 Bradco Supply Corp Construction Supplies $42,12823 22 -6200 07101199 CSR Rinker Construction Supplies $731.03 22 -6200 07101M Tarmac Amenca Construction Supplies 55,107.00 22-6200 07101/99 Pro Made Supply Construction Supplies $2.33428 22 -6200 07/01/99 U.S. Concrete Pipe Construction Supplies $3,744.86 22 -0200 08/13199 Florida Detroit Diesel Generator $ 19,199.97 22 -8200 07/29M Pro Mack Supply Construction Supplies $4,953.99 22 -8200 07/29199 Osprey Building Materials Construction Supplies $17,521.44 22.8200 070199 Electrical Supplies Inc. Supplies $5.290.00 22 -8200 0789/99 Osprey Building Materials Construction Supplies $8.723.97 22 -8200 0789/99 Tarmac America Construction Supplies $219.50 22 -6200 08/13199 Associated Air Products Construction Supplies $17,395.00 22 -6200 08/13199 American Concrete Ind. Construction Supplies $189.00 22 -6200 08/13= Osprey Budding Materials Construction Supplies $4,873.08 22 -8200 06/13/99 Pro Mack Supply Constriction Supplies $9,774.72 22.8200 08/13/99 Rexei Consolidated Supplies $252.50 22 -6200 0827109 Dal Tile BaM=m Tile 54,871.82 22 -8200 0887199 Associated Air Products Construction Supplies $16,060.00 22 -6200 06WM Osprey Budding Materials Construction Supplies X985.17 22.8200 08027199 K 11 M Electrical Electrical Supplies $8,201.00 22 -8200 0887199 Engineering Specialties Co. Construction Supplies $20,376.00 22 -6200 OGMOMI OW Tile Battxoom Tqe 54,890.88 22 -8200 09/10/99 K 3 M Electrical Electrical Supppe3 $4,843.00 224200 08/10188 Pro Made Supply Construction Supplies 52.407.32 22.8200 0911G99 U.S. Concrete Pipe Construction Supplies 5265.32 22 -8200 ToW 1998 Bond Issuance Costs $492.001.81 $2.280,889.41 1999 Bond Issue Dabs vendor Description Amount Acct tt 09173196 Osprey Building Materials Construction Supplies $4 ,30287 23 -6200 0921M Tarmac America Construcilon Suppfies •5309.50 23.6200 0923199 Sectrical Supplies Inc Supplies $5,600.00 23 -8200 00r'23R9 Aeousdca l DW# bjwm. Inc le suladon $699.71 23 -8200 10p7199 Dal Tile Construe lon Suppiles 54,558.59 23 -202 10107199 Tarmw America Cor.- *w1onSuppltes 512,779.50 23-202 10(07199 Osprey Sulding Materials Construction Supplies $ 10,182.25 23 -202 10007199 K 6 M Electrkai Electrical Supplies S2,156.00 23 -202 10(07/99 CSR Rinker Construction Supplies $11,593.30 23 -202 10/22/99 CSR Rk*or Construction Supplies $10.50 23 -202 11105/99 Florida Detrok Diesel Generator $113,525.03 23-6200 11/05/99 Consolidated Electric Suppl Electrical Equipment 5659.01 23 -8200 11/05199 -Tannac Ametica Construction Supplies 5990.00 23 -8200 11/19199 Dal Tae Construction Supplies $876.00 23 -8200 11119/99 Engineering Specialties Co. Construction Supplies $177,105.00 23 -8200 11/19/99 Osprey Budding Materials Construction Supplies $6,564.73 23 -6200 11119199 Bradca Supply Co. Construction Supplies S74,383.23 23 -6200 1 iW99 Tarmac Amain Construction Supplies 5122200.00 23 -8200 11/19/99 American Concrete Ind. Construction Supplies $2,491.00 234200 11/19/98 Celotex Corporation Construction Supplies $1,358.80 23-6M 23 -8200 52,703,032.43 23 -6200 _: b Total 1999 Bond Issuance Costs $442,343.02 Total Cocks Issued By the City 52,703,032.43 TcW Sales Tax Savings 5762.181.96 CHMGE ORDER OWNER ❑ CmiVactor's doh: Nurnber - 9858 ARCHITECT ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ FIELD AIA DOCUMENT 6701 OTHER D PROJECT: Palm Beach Gardens Municipal Complex CHANGE ORDER NUMBER TWELEVE (12) City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail DATE: March 1, 2000 Palm Beach Gardens. FL 33410 TO CONTRACTOR: ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO: 562 - 96/2.21 Suffolk Construction Co., Inc. 3801 PGA Blvd., Ste. 1002 CONTRACT DATE: June 15, 1998 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 CONTRACT FOR: Renovations /New Municipal Cplx. The Contract is changed as follows: Furnish all labor, equipment, materials, and supervision for the following work: PCO # 123 Credit for material for ceiling change ................................... ............................... ($ 500.00) PCO # 104 Roof tile vent .................................................................. ............................... ($ 0.00) Not valid until signed by the Owner, Architect and Contractor. ($ 500.00) $ 669.00 $ 1,863.00 $ 1,244.00 $ 2,729.24 $ 1,733.00 $ 3,026.00 $ 3,062.00 $ 8,432.00 $ 4,959.00 $ 264.00 $ 1,269.00 $ 576.00 $ 5,298.00 $ 965.00 $ 1,535.00 $ 8,945.00 $ 772.00 $ 47,341.24 $ 46,841.24 The original (Contract Sum) was ................................................... ............................... i 13,132,520.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders (11 R) .................. ............................... $< 2,745,274.88> The (Contract Sum) prior to this Change Order was .......................... ............................... $ 10,387,245.12 The (Contract Sum) will be (increased) by this Change Order in the amount of .................... $ 46,841.24 The new (Contract Sum) including this Change Order will be ............... ............................... $ 10,434,086.36 The Contract Time will be (unchanged) by ........................................ ............................... (0) days. The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is ................ 2110100 NOTE: This summary does not reflect changes in the Contract Sum, Contract Time or Guaranteed Maximum Price which have been authorized by Construction Change Directive. Architects Desion Grout), Inc. Suffolk Construction Co.. Inc. City of Palm Beach Gardens Architect Contractor Owner 333 N. Knowles Avenue 3801 PGA Blvd., Suite 1002 10500 N. Military Trail Address Address Address Winter Park, Florida 32789 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 By. Date By Date By Date AIA DOCLOLWT G761 - CHAt+SE ORDER - I 9 EDITION - AIA - 1987 - THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS 6701 -1987 Credits PCO # 50 Additional distribution panel to meet code ............................ ............................... PCO # 100 Reroute water line in Lobby of City Hall ............................. ............................... PCO # 103 Add concrete beam at SW comer of Police Station to support window ...................... PCO # 107 Redesign of roof drains at Police Station ............................. ............................... PCO # 113 Redesign of roof drains at City Hall ................................... ............................... PCO # 116 Exposed electrical panels in hallways required lockable doors .. ............................... PCO # 117 Existing holes in ceilings and walls of fire Station required filling .............................. PCO # 119 Ceiling height adjustments for the installation of HVAC ductwork ............................. PCO # 120 Relocation of fire riser at Fire Station per Fire Department request ......................... PCO # 121 Install chase around exposed fire alarm panel in Fire Station ... ............................... PCO # 122 Ceiling was changed from plaster to drop in to accommodate access panels............ PCO # 125 Added electrical outlet for refrigerator in Fire Station .............. ............................... PCO # 147 Changes to physical agility room ........................................ ............................... PCO # 155 Added fire dampers to HVAC to meet code .......................... ............................... PCO # 156 added handicap ramp at Police Station to meet code ............. ............................... PCO # 157 Grounding for computer floor ............................................ ............................... PCO # 179 Added door sweeps to doors at Fire Department request ........ ............................... Costs Total Not valid until signed by the Owner, Architect and Contractor. ($ 500.00) $ 669.00 $ 1,863.00 $ 1,244.00 $ 2,729.24 $ 1,733.00 $ 3,026.00 $ 3,062.00 $ 8,432.00 $ 4,959.00 $ 264.00 $ 1,269.00 $ 576.00 $ 5,298.00 $ 965.00 $ 1,535.00 $ 8,945.00 $ 772.00 $ 47,341.24 $ 46,841.24 The original (Contract Sum) was ................................................... ............................... i 13,132,520.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders (11 R) .................. ............................... $< 2,745,274.88> The (Contract Sum) prior to this Change Order was .......................... ............................... $ 10,387,245.12 The (Contract Sum) will be (increased) by this Change Order in the amount of .................... $ 46,841.24 The new (Contract Sum) including this Change Order will be ............... ............................... $ 10,434,086.36 The Contract Time will be (unchanged) by ........................................ ............................... (0) days. The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is ................ 2110100 NOTE: This summary does not reflect changes in the Contract Sum, Contract Time or Guaranteed Maximum Price which have been authorized by Construction Change Directive. Architects Desion Grout), Inc. Suffolk Construction Co.. Inc. City of Palm Beach Gardens Architect Contractor Owner 333 N. Knowles Avenue 3801 PGA Blvd., Suite 1002 10500 N. Military Trail Address Address Address Winter Park, Florida 32789 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 By. Date By Date By Date AIA DOCLOLWT G761 - CHAt+SE ORDER - I 9 EDITION - AIA - 1987 - THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS 6701 -1987 CHANGE ORDER. OWNER ❑ Contractors Sob Nuertber - 9858 ARCHITECT ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ FIELD ❑ AIA DOCUMENT G701 OTHER PROJECT: Palm Beach Gardens Municipal Complex CHANGE ORDER NUMBER THIRTEEN (13) City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail DATE: March 16, 2000 Palm Beach Gardens. FL 33410 TO CONTRACTOR: ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO: 562 - 96/2.21 Suffolk Construction Co., Inc. 3801 PGA Blvd., Ste. 1002 CONTRACT DATE: June 15, 1998 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 CONTRACT FOR: Renovations/New Municipal Cplx. The Contract is changed as follows: This Change Order is for the following proposed change orders, as indicated in attached letter to O'Donnell, Naccarato 8 Mignogna, Inc., dated April 12, 2000 and attached PCO log. Proposed Change Orders: 61, 63, 64, 75, 79, 84, 86, 88, 90, 94, 95, 97, 114, 115, 118, 124, 126, 127, 132, 135, 141, 143, 148, 149, 150, 151, 158, 159, 161, 164, 167, 171, 173, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 182, 187, 188, 190, 192, 201, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, 216, 217, 218, 220, 224A, 225, 226, 227, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 237. The Balance of PCO #224 ($175,609.00) still under *eview. Total value of this Change Order to be $ 437,213.00 Not valid until signed by the Owner, Architect and Contractor. The original (Contract Sum) was ................................................... ............................... $ 13,132,520.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ( 12) .................. ............................... $< 2,698,433.64> The (Contract Sum) prior to this Change Order was .......................... ............................... $ 10,434,086.36 The (Contract Sum) will be (increased) by this Change Order in the amount of .................... $ 437,213.00 The new (Contract Sum) including this Change Order will be. . ...... ................................ $ 10,871,299.36 The Contract Time will be (changed) by ........................................ ............................... (140) days. The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is ................ 7101100 NOTE: This summary does not reflect changes in the Contract Sum, Contract Time or Guaranteed Mapmum Price which have been authorized by Construction Change Directive. Architects Design Group, Inc. Suffolk Construction Co.. Inc. City of Palm Beach Gardens Architect Contractor Owner 333 N. Knowles Avenue 3801 PGA Blvd., Suite 1002 10500 N. Military Trail Address Address Address Winter Park, Florida 32789 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 By Date By By Date Date AIA DOCUMENT GJPar! - CHANGE ORDER - 1987 EDITION - AIA - 1987 - THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS G701 -1987 CHANGE ORDER OWNER ❑ Contractor's Job Number - 9858 ARCHITECT ❑ CONTRACTOR ❑ FIELD ❑ AIA DOCUMENT G701 OTHER ❑ PROJECT: Palm Beach Gardens Municipal Complex CHANGE ORDER NUMBER FOURTEEN (14) City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail DATE: October 12, 2000 Palm Beach Gardens. FL 33410 TO CONTRACTOR: ARCHITECTS PROJECT NO: 562 - 96/2.21 Suffolk Construction Co., Inc. 3801 PGA Blvd., Ste. 1002 CONTRACT DATE: June 15, 1998 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 CONTRACT FOR: Renovations /New Municipal Cplx. The Contract is changed as follows: This Change Order is for the following proposed change orders, as indicated on the attached PCO log signed by Ray Casto of O'Donnell, Naccarato & Mignogna, Inc., dated October 10, 2000. Proposed Change Orders: 240, 242, 243, 244, 247, 248, 249, 250, 251, 252, 255, 257, 258, 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265 Total value of this Change Order to be $ 121,282.00 Not valid until signed by the Owner, Architect and Contractor. The original (Contract Sum) was ................................................... ............................... $ 13,132,520.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ( 12) .................. ............................... $< 2,106,018."> The (Contract Sum) prior to this Change Order was .......................... ............................... $ 10,871,299.36 The (Contract Sum) will be (increased) by this Change Order in the amount of .................... $ 121,282.00 The new (Contract Sum) including this 'Change Order will be ............... ............................... $ 10,992,581.36 The Contract Time will be (changed) by ........................................ ............................... (0) days. The date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is ................ 7101100 NOTE: This summary does not reflect changes in the Contract Sum, Contract Time or Guaranteed Mabmum Price which have been authorized by Construction Change Directive. Architects Design Group, Inc. Suffolk Construction Co.. Inc. City of Palm Beach Gardens Architect Contractor Owner 333 N. Knowles Avenue 3801 PGA Blvd., Suite 1002 10500 N. Military Trail Address Address Address Winter Park, Florida 32789 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 By By Date Date By Date AIA DOCUMENT G701 • CHANGE ORDER • 1987 EDITION • AIA • 1987 • THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS G701 -1987 '^ I' ST0 �II V` 'I //"A N P I �1 IC I U 1 L SCHI • SL 3 11,1 IlLN 3P G # 9 m r H ASE 3 PALM t EACH GAR)E 1'lIS FLOmPlA ARCHITECTS: • FANNING/HOWEY ASSOCIATES, INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: FANNING/HOWEY ASSOCIATES, INC. LANDSCAPE/IRRIGATION DESIGN: ROY-FISHER ASSOCIETES, INC. O N 9 C" N WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA ORLANDO, FLORIDA MICHIGAN CITY, INDIANA s ;rming/Howey INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA � Associates,Inc. COLUMBUS, OHIO E Architects Engineers Consultants CELINA, OHIO 'o¢ WILLIAMSTON, MICHIGAN Y 222 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 148 PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 697-3660 Fax. (561) 684-4516 McLEAN, VIRGINIA Lic. #AA CO01552 MENOMONIE, WISCONSIN , ARCHITECTURAL AND STRUCTURAL ABBREVIATIONS ARCHITECTURAL MATERIAL SYMBOL LEGEND ARCHITECTURAL DRAWING SYMBOLS LEGEND Y r .aeRrnnws T/SED VI Mem.IN GENERAL ARE MOO BELOW.REFER iD CSI DONLIDO TO 1-4 ♦�a9 k Ea o .,, DAM NO+EMRER FOR MT/9BRENAiMIn u5E0 ON ME ORextxR Bul NOT usiFD 9ELOx. ,mx,Ei I `I I Ga4a dt snE —%—k— COOS OA p.µ.FOR1 1 _ Et.slxc coxtq. 1 , iliiiiii AL AIR oueornaiNa TV net Rost alle• Ilsu WIN —TM 'w�ni mmevm Imw PD.vwe T tyt tesr eonND•xw 4 m��� COWL R,oR m q, r a a.. �w+r IR1.gOY.IS NET WN'iM N.0 OP PETAL RcNN 8 PR ABLVE MOP.ELPOR MI FOLINOO. RCP .10020 OCTatrt PIPE Or ,pnew u»c Pwmw su Lia,?s1 ..R... ® w-oa(w scla+l \e A' Emtw vcxll urv,tuv Rr "`. �, NEM Pa..Em„.N .7 .4.rziouar gar s I_--L .1M.CmM.nE Ste Al ALVIOWL, pc ORE u CRP. x`�,rt.lu• ® �— Iv 9sar:sEC I lo+ Roal.N.wrn r...yG.�i noAm O ime APP. APPRO.. CA WIZ deLy uo.2cNwU .x.cm ( y..,. W....1 ..n MARA. O' .NWx/,NwE,.PE OR.,ERE P oncti •o• ++*^-^t-••• •yy mEeal WNaEIE .u..ewWN �� Wm N,,..Ex OJ 40 AW131.4 IRK 0.0.,.,.DmDR E Nm.«. e ® Wa °°° a 0, STMT.ORD 0,000 w a N, ® ...R.�.• MWU NOR. �(!7°o Cl No. IT.A.RE -= m o.,x�xx�R,E,<RN, �' _,-.�..� i .W.,..,N«...,..E 0—REV NOT(REFER ro NE.ale IE.E.) 1C v w sa BM ion eau= SECT stn.D.N▪ w/Ew E x WNa 0200 u m I .axm�,o SwDgx Na D iw wr �9.N M D PACER w Ce Ind EOS WIMP N.w Nror ..wt t , swu�,u U 0.▪ OTOI nrs kg 070 SA SPAM NEN.,. ,PE.I.1 toNrn �I II ROM RoDe..,:I ,N)`"t I/— eR w�.wlE..,E °” ©—EoDWneN..m..xE»r ma..°.,.N iw wxx M.,L ERE m H°—' U out .1-0 eau VS PAWS 9. SPEPAPA gar P' ,R,,,,..DN Dx rOlDxe ®—soure ruEw,e i.xmntgx TO (n I.dj W ■ ,,,,,,Iw x ow .0.1.0. W SO SpISI ro/.r ..... t13.Ct'_u' '-'xnMFNi.¢uunm .-- wWSnc nu¢Y.0 SOONE YAMS Igx/N.MtE SS7 StVYlB MO. . E O• us,TM ping MIER. ST n�`m a Wu .a .ND,P x,..,... W. . x. a MIME .P.P up pope pep,,00 �.. E .N s.Eanoa CO• CLEAPOOT n.l ^TM Al co. caterrE - up ,22/0 Tee male mo CAOLNE W./WN.xNE a Eu LL VA LOAD T MT, C.au. oueural ov to.La voma. Te TOP or cue 00To [M.A. ID. TELITROK L. Loma .x TAP TM. O .,Warr[,o E.a,.xx a rucc C.FEET by., .040 TOO Toe Or te0RETE WO CV Am CUSP Co.. IT adARKER.10 AS MP OE SILLI. a =D a. CO.....W,aa Z .uNr tws Etc) to r PM weleACTUNOT o NOM - 0 PLIAWDELP rd MOM LP, .17 NEMPLAIIV OM= Roc 14201102ovi let .PIPTIM a INDEX OF DRAWINGS 3r�ii o DE, MAIL .I, xEiN N P„// r. Nr0I n Nun w' 3 COYER rr7T5i o ;,;.° Ors N.m e.,.E MI ran/petpn./.mul/um. 77 os woo.. OM �1 v. °" T..WM`°°" n ..NE.E LANDSCAPE �4 to wax as0131 .., Sew.ra T../.NU.wM ARCHITECTURAL•M.,I I. ./ >m Ns CVVV/uIII�•••PUN 12. .000 Pr onowate NA MI ma.-ERE n. [�0 PV.ACME L MI fleet PE.-I6 Nea i 11 Item RAI-La OMR • P..rt,P,.o Pt wrt,Ra,a•u[ we 04311.CLOSET/.c O.. -- ■CT 1 0e2tt RA MMU S S 17 ell e.Di SEC./1 RP 0004 Kerr▪ M.A.rt.�N TD Z 8 f Ps PRO.020.sue. Ali .. .�D we FMK F. -i I_ ® /o `° "'°n"°""Err CalEleoP P9 ■CVMS PER 540/6 I. Em EVER. W y E -- e.°�" m A. P.,oAM a i x N i I'nwm `ROY-FISHEF ASSOCIATES,IN L•...;,:/E.� 1.,„ j i - QTY. BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING �� --.A.--� DSTING CHAIN USN FENCE WITH FLAME NNE I. lino..� NINE m BE REMOVED) 43 TRIPSACUM DACTYLOIDES FAKAHATCHEE GRASS #3 FULL 4' O.C. EXISTING PINES 252 CHRYSOBALANUS ICACO'Hoax DWF.COCO PLUM #3 FULL 24' O.C. LANDSCAPE U s-SABAL PALMS 57 VIBURNUM SUSPENSUM VIBURNUM SUSPENSUM #3 FULL 24" D.C. ARC pI, Q LAND i xt /]FANANATCHEE 31 MYRSINE GUTANENSIS MYRSINE #7 FULL 3K O.C. • GRAM UNDER STORY 15 SABAL PALMETTO SABAL PALM 12'-14'C.T. ax.,>arAmm PLANTING H'O.C.) 2 ILEX GASSING DAHOON HOLLY 8'HLx 5'SPR,FULL P E'•)"0 3 QUERCUS VIRGINIANA LNE OAK 14'-16'18'4'CAL (eitii;iim'N°)t O 1185 DECORATIVE GRAVEL WITH WEED-BARRIER SQUARE FEET VERIFY ON SITE 16-/)MYRSINE(]'D.� ! 750 CYPRESS MULCH WITH WEED-BARRIER SQUARE FEET VERIFY ON SITE 0 2 STEPPING STONE 2'x2' 1-DWDON HGLL /J / CO C !.�� carvcacE wNz iliii, \ / wsD s0.n.CYPRESS MULCH S� ,�r1�l ` \ RH wi.F1.-BARRIER YP e '.,,,,d%1‘ K-/]NBURNUM SUSPfrvSUM ........i rw'�1��. i RGD ARSMDWN co...... W I \• EXISTING OVtS ✓>BSI6NBDRY W �R� SR l•Ia• ` CADOW4 5-SABAL PALMS NBDR ,N NDM 5D5P NS� ':: :_. 1 165 SO.FT. �-_. \ I1 ECO�TNE GRAVEL j".N - • t0]-pRF L L TH WEED-BARRIER I :‘,;j: 1 UNDER STORY PNRNG(a'D.C.).i `V0.11 / 150-DWF.COCO 0.04 NBUNNUY SUSPENSOR 4•' W t-DAHOON HOLLY . IN,� �.1 EXISTING Q , /� � i MISTING P■ 1 i \`, NBURNUM o --. - vist-t..... r'N ,.T,���1I 1-r - a'-�� I MSTI SUSPENSUM. all cu OUIIIIIIIIIIIIFOi���,_ I I I /�� I DUSTING PINES 11 r �KRw GHNN FENCE NMI I 1 • \1--'' ;I' I - j �� UNIA NE(NNE f.• l-STEPPING STONE ]-UNE ONL(T5'O.C.) .-. tc, I v: • • I BE REMOVED) TO'. I PROPOSED CV i5-N MYRSINE(]'QL.) 1 1i' // II I 'I 0 EXISTING ditS BUILDING (n I 5-Sri.PALMS \r-\ ❑ I 1 II r'' �I I �I Olt_ J,' —1 � ! k I I' / r��� i O an I - . x °, 1_.L-i, ATCH LINE 1,33,- L _ --14 PTCH LINE) ) : Ds�CA�E a �v'2 i a N LANDSCAPE LIMITS �s \ I SITE PLAN o o/ ro \ O cn PHASES BUI�DI\G9 SCALE: 1 50'-0" cn a p SCALE: 1"=16'-0" w 0 x o Di0 m O w r OY-FISHE• ASSOCIATES,IN a�A�` �i/�`, 1,tlb' 41 PI,W"•■ OlnpvS: MEASDREMENTS qcw ow o LANDSCAPE -revs and P ee wdn accept.),mote' sign material shall be removed from plantsg - -Height _-u from the group ° height w ro aos[n w ARCRQIpLIVRE& -Cane bs o n-ol to disturb P m from the center of the trunk xrs(v<p ill be measured e ue -6 above grade '/ rip r/�_s/a'n LAND PIANNQAG u^ilCare ...Cos tlu moge any underground c or Y Sp E R)of w I� GG sell be rep..Any a `eon•s se tCOrtroctar tln n d by stn r.Whereof er Snrubarvnc g e- II be v a to F ntl.Spread anvil be meeaured tote ZggypA-q q,))fig cndeg expense o d sworn panting`motene s`d tl N 1n a or b nr9 uoly a un e s sub mcaa MOW of THE PALS sap MEOWS awaeg U Il pins plans,new locations stroll be ap-rove by the LandscooepA.c+sea c°`once w. e k(C f.)x - ` FAX. 0611 Mmst Cltrt a Ceo:dmo:e to k ondscope C for md.ur gad trunk L s me Immu.0 e green pad of the trunk or head�n woo,the xv scawmf on sunl¢o fmmxs shall 1�ngswwn ce ova lase N 'n from ens 9 �-A � � s urcrts p6l wpu Way. of zprm4-s bases cooly the moat+...hoc. o .,-'cnd_<aoe.c N ca a wrvde 't on mud oil g t(O.A.)anon ae necz..eo rrcm the prountl f°Ine 19 of[re p ned re.vedYe,r�xs S En. eV ` MATERIALS L Reuv oa r s�r 6uzw _ ondsceoeS Contractors .'be r ponsible I mate,..al _ t C>.�r n coo g shell brava. coral 55uttR CA.Part,pion silo,the pant list.6.n.,pvv y al soda an da mu.h snarl be venfid c precedence over _A3AN"EE'9 de n¢SE5 N=il- A i"Ip_„ - - l b =i=:` '11411=I1°I=1' e rye me r .Plant n=ir Il-n- ArERUL d ew year =11=1 11=11 -Plant species enc size Snail conform to Mose mogoteil o n me o-crofnas. Nomenclature shell conform o SANCARp PLANT - sedn pybv %mtll" ecCcnt !Cod a age =11- = y0 �tTlll=11=11=11=1x111 CASTING suxwnE GRADES A STANCARDSU LR NURSERY RANTS. - rejection a Sup onafhd s =11=11=11=11- gCV.Y lotest edition pubs..by Me Flo,. C. Deportment Asric.l!ree and Consumer Semites All during t lreparr demdge t Wants or!ovens pqy�®gy plants not cirrervise spear,.as Florida y� Np on replacements of no aeoto+m cost tY(rm) BRAWN SY Pldr sn ono outstond_ - by tgrt - - - and aaL�m-lanon at waste+atenol.dC'•a and rubbish site clean and x..from PALM PLANTING DETAIL SON° DARR vggd. _ ere insect e39a°__ for, l healthy, (EXCEPT FOR EABALS) s�wrX H°D adequate mot systems Trees ord shrubs for plont.ng rows shah be uniform s size a. SM vv ore om tree from subject roof Liar, pants turns ee snot be d her a. -iroee aFCI p¢mulcM1ev wr.Fin]<ncure wrtF]-e'u.mu'eh ca sing a the soot boll. d shot ever surface,staggered x octterr,Sod will so green in col.cod in-All cont.,.amen materiel Droll be heolcy.vigorous.wes-mot.ognts du+d c insects.asease and.ass than rOx c oo osev mlln p �...All gap Mit be farce Nth tt& xvs nn�• sedn moos.roil Wliat DI L'' rp AU no er gwnrw s l0 5',L I40 nnvE wvp uASi>m Arun nJ+mw aontar .per,Roct e.c d plants r, peon cep.ed en a„vev,rem rve Landscape Architect srakingugme,re_s shows ere not leaz.bk due approval with cona�hdne raM Tr ii-awr F w To isoma =� °+e'm as ea re All •reutvw ra n•e � 5T6Fi y arts mete of sncll pe c p y wed f om rav 601 PRIOR to ol�nt'ng it aw°!E!p PR...to:,rMmxs -, s_UY tom)acts glrnz U cerwell seed sosra Iranfor Jcoconuts. Coconuts shvl be Nosy.o C ee+ xxAS p e6r�iesw/gpoeMxYw,s �'��b, ,-ter 'x is w REFS me for Florida ur..1 tree s rxe arrzw¢ _ --.ca���1►.,Ir._„ rMnr yams stnling sir s of one n altl dle°eer.Branches oregca y --- '.:l '11=11=11-=1 ctu ;st e m 111=11= 11=11 g a leader or greater Cvmvetn branches =1111 I_�111 ° Lee competing accept.,of they occur__ Cx(FO he ! e e =- 1�1 zs"- o should Y paarcvnanaarL x.(�. the overall n! I m/t�`us ° - obeW;o cara�bo exclWed),but nwrt be rntacr wit °wc the degree)bow 1=11=11-n-1=;rr s'as RJ. of(leading)0-4. .11=11=11�=11- sn mom axu Po°TO...a evens(atagge(ea,ahem ring)t g Ine tree brunch- IY(TM r .. na comer roan a n SAHAL PLANTING DETAIL SRnepayneamvn nd eanrc wdn"tree up P at m;;41 a'eA trm' mg ti coon normal lewevyt 7,t7 gn :tint∎Arc,ee rocs.root o,c csarg.p ant es,amaper f.-- cV -AT trees a above grade(1 Sr S)° securely stoked o a be loo manner o mulch within the first.I-. Yu a nth -e' d l trunk n sRoot hell ty�nq topaz remove from run one p of boll mu PLE TRUNK TREES m¢woM s rrsisvnp FNaNSs LI MUTreea hosing no doting(I rank Sr...trees uc 9-nd "X CD RELOCATED TREES: similar rn sire.Canopy should be lull and underm. (Y VS pqr xis );1%j IS/PSS'T moo' JW'�1�•ys CleMe WINK.SS IT not on o grades and standards.Yet do r quality cdterd } -C,a• rn,0.W PLASM.Awpxlo _� F(i [ry rtn- O 3 an ° an fety d t. r.(cod Perw� mcy `O6Or�rtvmnAbirom I 1 t'r-e_ a 6u�A 1 PvxrNR�r "O¢rA^"V`� MD • )- meant we a pt.,. r t.on a ex h sum ?• I I,V,.N relocated by whtoh trees ow,County.Stole rrr.gov rather pyq r. .S 6 wnd� IS W relocatae dead t`<eeweez v pruning z NOT Dv+roandd soecrea epuo.p Exsx 16CrL ra I/-aww swam isuux qX �e �, U al Trees leach ar require a moor°..try"th ern d ___. �.,�, .a Can Tee a Landscape nrcn;em Ill�f"" `°--...w. - iT1=11=11 ,;"p--1= s.- troos O - d are man 0vS of the foliage should b lo.v reason 1=II-II-g-g-Il-- LI(,I pygOf a... Y ABM stop[ nrn6 ls=-'= Q w-r Pa'ms)mTreea: any drtm adz, ° II-I ,.11=n=� (e L. Qesc alma Sa 11= le, xt Suer.. -.II- b'_' ypost,vi�a en- apege broaching or branching aou plmay act human safety issues a Wed,.town. I=II'=11-11-L-.E- w..asst. J.-Ir X11 1 - s v SYB�s"s r/J eawo¢wins INIMIla° rune o acceptable. Y IT�Y-s, SA ILL F IMI Of � a ,,m o-rnnM,, qiM g 1%s R"LL.sr 1°I°�t/5 1MSCa O Q sawsvgwer Tenets y ^FgDlcrmoye to the tnrx/Eranehsa nil net e.cndciCR of the LunN dtvmeter arq a•rn 5 sF� / wtE r/soo_ OMENS OF M.ass,t-0 =6w. wvx N Ar-ea.lmaia.limb or canopy pruning wall be a-a''ree and Performed by a Caddied SHRUB k CRD[1NDCGVER PLANTING DETAIL TREE PLANTING DETAIL M z ID -50S qs: a en�a°ens Owner Trended suba,nw.an,.net be indicated b,_ me,.ahheet o `� o o Z ca o ca cn cn Li E-4 F+ C4 B, A ' ,00.001""--.TALRf 1'IAKEB I I II �� 2+NI�IG _ P D ,."---- 1 1 RE:gENTIAL 1 ; SITE DATA j L R 'I I ,oAr ��� 1 LU=RM PARKIN A.ACm Mm T. 1316 1 _ "��,,,,.:." 4� ' .uswa r�saan.c a.o I / o • � !r:,1 KNH A rN m i� :• �If Fi MACES MOVIOE0 EAST PARCEL WANT., , . I Isi. ,iiiiillik, 11""''' • ! COMMIES IMMEM n ,, SCHOOL CAPACITY two aruMKTa AMM < H �� � •cePPL Toga m O La w:I I `.�.I I .N 17.1•110/711167E1 ......PNr•TIT° =. ,Z C I 1 •/ U7 U Z L J I , ...i SITE AREA Si W - i1 a ":1 -1: �•lrew r o EC g 1 'j �,mMU.•PTAM ii 1�lj� M.EA.r�.AmAFFUC¢ ...:i• I .4 J< a, m y . M 1♦ 1 A Cr f.7 Z 5I , ,u ■ BuILD AAA 1-a= w I ir4.•_ M..RP"° �r ♦ ! Ur.AAK6 IFVCT.11.TM R7 f.1 Z a_ GARDENS EAST 1 II O ----- '' O< Q a 2.MAIM NALL APARTMENTS 1 III - THE OAKS w'�- U. d 0 ZONING = PCD i' D . SUN TERRACE .:,611116: 1 J LU=RM 1 ; FLAT m;:.' as > 11 4 - — b...M,.CLAMMY .PI SLAM; .M W a o - ‘011111111110 11 THE OAKS di RESIDENTIAL C.UooTVMIT& s 0. 4 12 � i ��' ZONINGi�Rivri �:MI ::°:_ �� 1 �� IU=RL ...:aF. Y q I ;_ ----j. .. .� `I LOT COVERAGE siEntarEMEWr 4.71;1:1:1.i.L.IM i'I1�. / ` • su3° i '� I f MM.M. l2•27107 1167.,*CMS MAMA CEDAR GARDENS OFFICE t 15? ZONING = PO 1 ,L , ;.AL- u PHASE SCHEDIRE wra 23.1131 6F. LU=PO - _.;1.�v��I�.'ii ` PHASE/ RECREMIONAL SITE i a S..w.•Hall MK11iM. L' /�1y� � 11 [.....\.'I THE OAKS PP PN4m8E pIVE °�/! - �,• ; ': ZONING = RM _ 10 NS EAST p E , _' ' w= ,u ;; LU=ROS PNAMOMS M MIA OM .67 ME MAMMON GARpE "� p RECREATIONAL-OPEN SPACE PHASE 4 MOS 116711 . U - 1' i ... s I I TRACT L MM.NAME.AMMON To wmx•uwTU..r C o R 9'9''- IA 0,,rot V.SITE)•-.66 NOTE, wcM Me.111.6 MALL SS PSS xn. 1 y �i 11 3 ;,t;et I c.°3 oI F s ., i •T11T.L....��a.T•.a.L M NN.cm 3~V4 MN N I a ;1. 10,,,..... :, 1 _ E�IR - ; . N I' _� I ,I, OF PALM BEACH GARDENS DJ :I ' - 1 i OAKS PARK tt{{ I Fii CCCJJJ Q j I,t+ GMURGA II,r+` i t..... I CV ..-L i t.::-rer III. t 1. ii,..._ ,,,, ,; I ,,, .; ,,n iIa l� 1 1 �' —ONINGo 3i{lL31 p�j 3 1111 {IS 1� _, '71 1RES.LOW DEM t ` PALM BEACH GARDENS __ mS`'"m"° IILU=RL MEDICAL CENTRE 3-Silk b_b t ACRES.LOW DEN' j 1 1 II s ZONING = PUD/PO ;� 1 - , V LU=P Prj i 1 Ty---:i z .4 t p :D a 1 I 'N✓ PLAZA NORTH MEDICAL CENTER CO J E `` ivk Il/�o': S;1'fi -'' °3II+,aH° ZONING _ PO ~ - • 1111 LU=PO o m a w MO s lE VI CU I �� E • - ►'__ SITE PLAN .,.� Li. I IV O:\99012.02\PLOT\G1 2P0ases.cwg Wed Sep 27 11:43:15 2000 MONICA -------' '71---'"INA t - -.-,--•-•_... --11.\:, -,-- ---=-------'-'- '- — 4,..e., 4 l '''.'. 0 1.11111% i —777.' .1.9 -1:-,1--. iitir7r.j.i.----711\ ' . \s:, IWIHII- 1-_ -.or i , \ 11117--77" .. Wet \1111 ' -•". . . Ami, 11 l'N -7:-A l' \\ \ / °III i \ .1' TOOL '''' ,., Am °PSI k 11W_—-_1_,.... ...\)‘,,,y1 1\ vis, \ ., 1 , i, 1116 -i____,,,,----. ...,::‘,4■ : go' \ ,..0 ' - I—-------,„ kV:1 ••J i 1 ni - r-----e•-•-•""1.....Li li;1, • \ wig OS WO ilillielliSri \ \ 910 % ' tilliiii.1.111111011 \k \ c____. . 1. e , 1 L ' `1�'1L1i''1 \ 'r i t 6 \ t.i, I, -_ A ._.--_—J I Fa�„J 1 F ' m I I JiF c.,. ---- 3 . i , ‘ ., \\s„. „,___,„, _________H-:::;,___\ 1 m m W • W w„.Ark _ frimilll I 1 n i _______ ___,, .___. ‘ \ _,___, r . 1 ;49,„ 1,1 C 0 \-2___,----N 0 tr4 ________________ er_r_ndiere,--.1e.r4:,.,7,-- _ ..._. n ---= _....7,„ .._ _: ,_...„4....„25r,...,;_._,_ _ __„.... ,...._. ..._.,____:____:_, _Ii,...11 .:., ,.._.„4.0 .„—7—, sis .. i-- Iii-ii, ,, V\tl 1 0 `I �` )4 ` F' 1 it 11 la ---,--.!'n 4 1.3 IF ! • \ ,, I 1 lari,,,..-= ....;_vo, 1 gir ',„„,,i‘ \ •l_ \-A,, ► \ -1� \\\:1\‘ 1 t , moo \\2\ c.....„ \ ., \ .‘31.1 \ — 1 . . \ 101111. R. 'L 1L:1 "11 . ' IIII 110 'R, —:=_—_-----:-__ --- -7-E-------21 2', c r-n. 0, —1 1---7------1 11 \ \ __Jidi fli g 1. / , 0 0 r \ ., ...1 ;,_, ,,, 1 . ,.„ . ,_ , 1 _. i (1 \s, 1 •A l l_ I F N 1 ., , IT_ I l is ° rte • I O tL PHASED SITE PLANS I�IQf� ST.MARK'S 10°x`_ ° MLO"�c1 e� Ism A =-,,.=” 111�71F�nning/HOwey EPISCOPAL SCHOOL LJ LJ Associa�Inc PALM BEACH GARDENS,FLORIDA G1 2 ---— Architects Engineers Consulrents PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT ..,.....,,V ••«•r•• CONCRETE ENOWALL Y �--- 0 -—-44D.n t 104'-a' BS•-IE r a I ❑DRAINAGE CONTROL STRUCTURE 1 I pii:•i Ji i:•i:�iii:0ii❖i:ci:� III nNG BJ7TFMY o :%�i:i4•iiii:�:i:r•:i•::�:�: , O BE p-NOTED I EMSENG AAIIALT EXISTING P071Aa[ :::PROPOSED r.i':'i:•:': ��i a: I ■ C9 I +T F. CLASSROOM BUILDING St:4•�4r, 1 II I e �0•14,000 S.F.+:44:4•:r'�::::iP. I 1 tOAL N •�•:4❖:•S:•:r ❖:44444s�••i • •I ; GNL]EA PAD ' SIDEWALK ,.:4••4444❖W..•••i:••,A,,4❖d,•4.4 ''MANHOLE\ DRAINAGE r.�:02r..•s.�:':ososo2ryrro:'r� i a 0 IY 1 I WATER PUMP L.J 1i U- _ �� cn o 1' CATG BS, —I— _ t, ON—V t, w 11 II FAST Cl 01140 M BLDG.14 FAST nASSROlW BIDE.15 II C7 E-- DUSTING DRIVE —3 - II o a 6 a 1 _ - CASTING t J 2 t Cl III II FUYtliWNO AREA II o CA I NOT TO CO DISTURBED ;,o m F w U 1 ` N W TO■ 1 1� CATCH BASIN E%rs11NC FENCE >�;1 CO I J 1 d I EUSTIMG%AIDING _ RELOCATD7 MG PIXEL I 1Y//// FxIST.1STORY BLDG. _ _ It _I- ATCI CAST � FpSDNG BUILDING WA R MEIER J \ W CNFLOW PRO 410R OW 1'\ L EA1rnXG 4 ;1 BRDING] U I 1 Innr— ✓ - 11 / b 4 CATCH BASIN I I F] ING .C c, W 0 V O o \11 BINDING 2 / 5 57 TOTAL ,\ CU PAAI(ING \ 6 m I II RAIDING TACOS) I C=] C�J �/�/ `9ACE5 ;1 O 6 ■ 1 1 . 11.\r41 cl 'WA 1 / 147j 00o r / \ o00 /Ir\___,J TI , a '11‘ 1 01 1 3 I B LpNC 1 a 8q Y r''' I 6 r2 i a e ! rx -- '.JO V 11 W M• [vo \ SITE PLAN tr.,. _01 lip a 'E (O rn I a ------------------------------ —EL--- BURNS ROAD — --------------- o I'EX O:\99012.00\plat\A1-1.dwg Fri Oct 20 13:06:32 2000 MONICA oa as 110.4 r r-r I e-r {r-{ rn ir I re 4 r-0 wa ,.A„ us s i ,-, ,,.,i =? Mill .......... 4 •,u•i iii )- IIIIII it•• •- IlimHuililllllll Immarama r,• =Iii= § - Q 1-I-� '1111m - —— ® r :91I�I�a_ , ® 4 ,-- • ; Ii!iuu!I .,., p..`∎:, 11111111111 .' 7, 1 i 1 ED ' X x ,..� $ PI Iiiill Ili, �l a = �la i r r-r � e 72 II a tt q •E o ell s n I _ i . 1 §� �® § —-- ------ I b O = II 5 11 1) ; 4 :. 411 i 11 II 1 1 .. TN 1 > ® � 11 a II $'i 1, 0 1 II II II® 1 a { r1 II 111 4' AA ann,. Ia-r -1 A,'-r AJ L 6 II Mir' A, II ;_ o IIIIIIIIIl11-NE` a 0, L. I g " X11111 �• - �a y_w0 - `. ; T lid i. - edlllllll1111111I11I11II1111I111111I111111111111 •IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIDie a mmmeum,u,.. f . uea I i II i Z flu R47 ■n tiIiii I Fii iuiiuiiiiiuin ®kizeMBM�Rfi.,■1 r nom,rut *room BUILDING I 9 ql I ,.,,,,x ,OM NO, n011oo I Ir711 m 1imng/Howey ST. MARK'S LJ YJLJ A$V sates,Inc. EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ..".4 Y Architects Engineers Consultants M.1 PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA D:\99012.00\plot\A1-2.dwg Fri Oct 20 13:32:10 2000 Vincent • — ii--® f , i.II Il lllllllllll lll11.7.7ml...11llllll ,..1 A =101 11111110.11l''".....m"r....m"itt,,,�I'!,1 . `�p!I_i IIIII I�II11II1II1111111111II111111III 1IIII11I'' ' 1 .I r = �i- ._—it= 11_!l! 11A11 ell ��i . x x ._. J T. a n-` rd o� I'IENIIII III 111111 pippin" FmIIIIm nIIIIIIIIIIIImllll.11lll.l Z V a a i; all y 0 O - I I IIIIIIIII IIII IILIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII!IIIIIIIIIIIIIIImmmIIIIIllllHHI I A e a1 2 O a a 7-1 le l3 b ®II b � I_ $ I ""l" Y. V, j 1— .T _I� . b = :'7,.... I. II 1 ! licit I 4 II 1�_.1 , ii MN! l i rI IIm Ilmmlmm 13' ---Z 11 ulllllillllllllumnnlnnllllll�I I_Illlill i 8 �1r `III[IIl1 e1 l � 9i n® `4✓� " II- 1nL[III111111 I 4111IIIIM1IBMIIIII1111NIIIII 11IEMB11MIIII1NNIBMIIIN lulu. l ■a■_4 "a 1: II ll [I v-. Illllll l — FLOOR PLAN.xw r.00x BUILDING A 9 I comma ZOOM rlwxnlcx..allaum.c I .g �.��—xIR o J FJnrung/Howey ST. MARK'S Associates,Inc. EPISCOPAL SCHOOL A1.2 Architects Engineers Consultants PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 0:\99012.00\plot\A3.1.dwg Fri Oct 20 13:15:29 2000 MONICA a } 6 es, ill ell , 11, E r _ , _2 ' - (1' 7 r II ' (, ° lel 7 El Fig u. 041 gi A P 0 m 1111 IOW O O2 h'.[5J 80 0 lA ti RI 1 l O 6 D vie .'1 1 ii te L__1 '1-4 0© f ,I 111 e0 � I ilk a 104,PI 0 7 ''' its 7 „' ° 6 19 111141 L r z. 0 m®®®®ommmmmmm mm©®mmmmeoeme® o©®®®®®o®mm®m®m®®©®mmmmmm®oo®od © ® ®®©®®o®o ooae000 0 m 3 €z Olds a 91 8 3 E -,;Hi- Gd aa1I=,C a �R11 �'� a9 � , � aC � E� a [>!i Br 3 E � � B "�� � '�, d� r 14! I : �' t 1E gaa a a! IuiiiIlliir lg r aA 8 azi g ,1 4 a 'NORTH&SOUTH ELEVATIONS' BUILDING I e L��'®e n�wr..m.m�I MI .,..r .x .''m'® k6n^ning/Howey/ ST. MARK'S (yssociae,Inc. EPISCOPAL SCHOOL "" ....DAM-r"w— Architects Engineers ComuNants A3.1 PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA ■I1■■ KEYNOTE LEGEND — g (7)ari gra a ra r K 0 513.3 AST Fe."TO 5.1.1 M. 0 ZW.MIUTYVVP%.7.41:4 I 0...xx....pm le naca.euZsic 0•447 434 um. I . C)r 0.88 moron an(3.1.13 1 a.aL • —1 0 0-\ V 1 t8 Z.•1.8 0 r au••■mamrk an 88•8800r,•.r. 0 r au.8 am mute.mem.art 0 mowicIr•11.41 p p.p.pp e r ou A a n a 54 0 ,4",”44,A 1 '-\\ = t MNO 0 en"Da 88.I..xxxteru an onnwnerr•lr n • 0 saftem sm waa,•88 m smouta 3.3 8 5311 PP 33P I0 514130P.31133 6 Pig 3130.1....ma p.n.m snamu.my < .1 0 r VT 91.3 PM.3 013 xeco.etogso e 1.131<owl no boa TO snucatm woo 0 CC- 0 _==!___ . 5,,, e Nome NA oxx poo,8 slum.am.) _I WI ,KoL,L114...t, (3' GI 0 zw 0 @ gra 2 glai 454 mai Aut tam m ST.MARKS e„...... .. MIDDLE SCHOOL g..,, ... 0 IX % ' , T>1.- —. - . ■ j l" ---e.,',... @.13.rasemc 0...13 h/003 0 yp10.10■31.3.110 A P..U. g 0 i 0.1100........ e 1311331.1 CO 3.....01/3.1 2 o LL, 0.1.13-1/1.14.13.0.1 < 0 PM 0713 CP a_ 8...... 8.....,...—.........—..., 8.....m-4 8........ EAST ELEVATION e.. 0=rpm v 800 sum.3.1 AP SE. 0,y 7 WM NAE4-FNO4 AM.441,5 4r 1 G Ai 0■,/,'..... 0',.... 0.tri-7141F.,LS 0 j,4"1...%+Vi.P.M ® 0,....... 0 0...gp....p... .3( 0 0 41. 0 0 0 0 ... C.-1 ,,,;24,4 6 oulancua tan mw mm ex.88 osm.8.80 •—■ ••■••■••■■■■■•■••••■■•■ 6 rm,,,,m8■••■••■•8"......wm., Mriligillill 0 03.3 S..93139 0 . 4166,.. d ea.11=1 0.8 ma o 6 a.rmom•ammo . 0—,—....... 0,-41 . 0-- 3 gl 0 ILT:=47.r4."'"•°"""' 0.,, -, 111131r co,—nor.ve norro 8.8...8.1 Z.a/ 0 1 rrj E. MN 6•84.8r esierf foram O FAO Ko• ,..,..7a, 8,,,,.„,.„, < 0....=. CNJ 0 0 sum 8.8,8n Ef] a ST.MARKS -,-, 0 14NAINusina mon ID MILE 4N 01310 OM lEii ., u MIDDLE SCHOOL 0 P.m au mis CO 0 ye nom of 8-E•88 co 35ff rut sno ram. • ,..,, % MM ' j 0 woo•rm 08•88‘an onmoome m•as e ma rl 1 L., I IN 1 0 8r Is maw 8.84 i— En 0 3 . 2 3 I. 0 8 o . _k. A Es 1 -- CI.—. cl. ,..- c:3 WEST ELEVATION 4 CI au.q.--1-o. 4 a gg j4 . 2 l cn --- I II 4 17 1 Li • KEYNOTE LEGEND II 0 MiricFrana"'" Vg..V r 0 MOM MT OVIO TO 11.107K 00.1417 0.V.21:FAMISI=lag. I 0=our la•pm TO nun.moo '3‘1. 0 -.7.71771.t (21 raw°immix.rsepotoonom•ir Lc W. 0 8..ow comma.ode woman.u.go • • II IS _i% ./dr 1Przfe> 0 rate... g r au oloom so 1 0 ni-tal twa-17 wator co Qi 0 ,num,mamma an mmurzorri,. 1, • \0 \g` 0 g.z..„,........,,,,,,,,,,,,.., 0( p n, , 0 c,Stai.1 flini 7o 7-77.u.,7 our. a.o.eta.sue a....ma 0.71111 Moms.ravy 0 ealw,t•Ammo vox multo mo a•••no 0 op,,,mm moan am r•ra 10 nom.* < Et 0 111,..”,m maw.pup To sm..pqma, 0 209 . 202 9 IMO Sy OM(0 ID MM.7,* —1 INIL 7.4.=, 0 mono moo.OEM It MOM.0416124 1.7_ Ad IV N.9 S 0=MI toLoi Nma o nmou,..mums) -I _ i c7,Cf 3 i ') \ • . i _ „„. 0090 ... e f \0 0 j ll I \® g Pr loco tuo. g....m....... (9 M W R \® z 0 mtuv.o,nem..v-an.m wk.wt., t ° t0 ix on eomo mural own m.0•0 Km wee V 112 • CO COV DOR CU \ /0 0 vr C....MT.woe Mmes.•.•..omm, U)M < LJ „,.,.......rm.sow. 0 AV.LAT-17 WM 09 KRUM 0/79 1,41 0—E3 t1—@ <8.mom.orto am cam DE.EcTm.■••mm0 —.I 0 km.[moo w a g anwook ca. 0 mons 3-1,tru mon•ar...rt.mg mum. ®M.711,577 P.M.Srl... g mum w•co• 0 omm, BUILDING SECTION 01 @ mowoors 7 1.4 SILCC4.1350■■...I scut 1/4-1-0 0 1171.Ma Mau..mg.7717.07T Main•7,0.CiOkl a..--- 0"max sum-sa co. a—— a 929040909 0 0 77,7.7.77.,o7.7 92.29 ®WIN tona 0 0 92024204 7.7.777 77o,To.77.7c.,..7* Z 0 0 WM MU mu tr..ow utoonial M 0 moms sow on som 0 m mown SO KTFP 0.7777¢071 ci 0 comas own" >.0 Ll.1 o ,,,,,,,,,‘„“,K,,,,.,. 909204201 CO ,:, 0 rat,kin?:5/1.ow OM 74r777 nom mynas 202 ...-, 0 tom n,mow•,o etocurusmo 0....Imo.. (Ti 0 nun am..row . 0,,,,,,,,,,,•,,,,,,,,, -1-.. 0 sum cs..son ,9 U I G-■ I .3 O 0 mum ww.UM 0111.ID=KO WY WM Cal) = 0 Pomo au 1.1 A C._ 0 yr esm swelmon•roe mama,a ir•L e oft 1 L., 0 ur co ormno mom 3▪• 1:3 1 , .< .= ..., Z o ,E2 i 1 - 0_ -- 0 CN1 • i •■1: .., 11cn ..-- . . 6 111:17 1 ..