HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Council Agenda 021998CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 2/19/98
XI. RESOLUTIONS: Continued
Resolution 14, 1998 - Consideration of Approval of an Amendment to the Damerau Office
Planned Unit Development to Allow for a Time Extension.
Resolution 16, 1998 - Consideration of Approval of Appointments of Members to the Education
Advisory Board.
Resolution 17, 1998 - Consideration of Appointments of the Election Officials for the General
Election to be held in the City on 3/10/98 and the run -off election on
3/24/98 if same shall be necessary.
Resolution 19, 1998 - Consideration of Approval of the "Commons" Developer's Agreement.
XII. ORDINANCES:
Ordinance 4, 1998 - Consideration of Approval Providing for Amendment of the
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Palm Beach Gardens as Set Forth in
Exhibit "A "; Providing for Transmittal and For Codification in the
Comprehensive Plan (Consideration of First Reading)
XIII. ITEMS FOR COUNCIL ACTION
XIV. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION
XV. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
XVI. ADJOURNMENT
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Florida Statute 286.26, persons with disabilities
needing special accommodations to participate in this proceeding should contact James Waldron, Jr., no later than
5 days prior to the proceeding at telephone number (407) 775 -8255 for assistance; if hearing impaired, telephone
the Florida Relay Service Numbers (800) 955 -8771 (TDD) or (800) 955 -8700 (VOICE), for assistance. If a
person decides to appeal any decision made by the Council, with respect to any matter considered at such meeting
or hearing, they will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose, they may need to ensure that a
verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the
appeal is to be based.
3
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Date: February 19, 1998
Subject/Agenda Item
Consideration of approval for petition SP- 97 -16, a request by Steve Tendrich, agent for Devonshire
Associates, Ltd., for an amendment to the approved site plan for Parcel M -22 within PGA National
Resort Community. The proposed amendment includes:
landscaping and phasing modifications,
addition of 6 parking spaces,
addition of 90 covered parking,
elimination of the resident drop -off area at Phase II building,
addition of sidewalks.
The 22.49 acre site is located Yz mile north of the intersection of Ryder Cup Boulevard, on the west
side of Ryder Cup Boulevard, within PGA National Planned Community District.
Recommendation /Motion:
Staff recommends that Resolution 13, 1998 be approved with 14 conditions.
Reviewed by:
Originating Dept:
Costs: $
Council Action:
Total
City Attorney
Growth Management
[ ]
Finance NA
$
[ ] Approved Wicondaions
ACM
Current FY
[ ]Denied
Human Res. NA
Funding Source:
[ ] Continued to:
Advertised:
Other NA
Attachments:
Date:
[ ] Operating
Paper:
[ ] Other
Resolution , 1998
[ x ] Not Required
Site Plan
1
Submitted by:
Growth Management Director
Affected panties
[ ] Notified
Budget Acct #::
[ ] None
Approved by:
City Manager
[ x ] Not required
BACKGROUND:
Devonshire is a 337 unit life care unit with accessory facilities located on parcel M -22, within PGA
1
National Planned Community District.
The project was first approved by Resolution 110, 1987 (December 17, 1987) and substantially
redesigned by Resolution 42, 1991 (March 21, 1991) and Resolution 106, 1992 (November 19,
1992). A minor revision to the architectural plans was made by Resolution 60, 1995 (May 18,
1995) to permit enclosure of balcony areas. The site plan was further amended by Resolution 86,
1996 (June 6, 1996) to demolish the existing 77 -unit apartment complex on the site and propose
a new wing, change Phase I construction schedule to built seven additional units and reduce seven
units from Phase II with a total number of unit of 337, other modifications were also made by
Resolution 86, 1996, such as increasing the lot coverage, open space, proposing 82 covered
parking, increasing the size of the central amenities building from 45,186 square -feet to 48,368
square -feet, and other minor modifications.
The petitioner is requesting an amendment to the approved site plan and landscape plan for
Devonshire Life Care. In order to amend the approved landscape plan, the petitioner needs to
eliminate Conditions #4 and #12 of Resolution 42 -1991.
Condition #4 states: "The north, south and east buffers, where shown on the site plan, are to be
planted and irrigated within thirty days of the building permit."
Condition #12 states: " The following contingency plan shall be enacted to replace those trees
and palms that die during or from construction within the preserve /buffer area as inventories in
condition # 3 and relocated per condition # 5: three inches of new caliper will replace every one
inch of caliper lost; palms to be replaced one for one. Replacement shall be done prior to the last
building Certificate of Occupancy or as deemed appropriate by the City Forester and Landscape
Architect of Record."
The modifications will also include: Addition of 30 carports at the north property line parking lot
between new building Phase I -B and Phase II residential building, addition of 22 carports at the
northwest corner of the site , addition of 12 carports at the western boundary by the preserve area,
addition of 20 carports at the southern boundary by the "Dunbar Woods Condominium ", addition
of 6 carports by the covered entry drop -off at the amenity building, elimination of resident drop -off
area at Phase II building to provide additional landscape area, addition of sidewalks by Phase 1
Residential southwest parking lot to provide link into approved pedestrian walkway, and an increase
of total parking from 359 spaces to 365 spaces. In addition, the revised plan proposes to increase
the number of units in Phase I from 224 to 228 and decrease the number of units in Phase II from
113 units to 109.
The petitioner has indicated that the proposed modifications will not affect the parking layout or
vehicular circulation.
The City Forester has reviewed the proposed landscape plans. He has stated that this petition was
triggered by his code enforcement action, citing that the petitioner has removed a portion of the old
Ryder Cup Boulevard buffer trees and shrubs protected by the approved landscape plan, and that
the three landscaped buffers on the north, south and eastern boundaries should have been
installed in July of this year per Condition #4 of Resolution 42, 1991. The buffers have not been
installed to date.
The petitioner is proposing to install a privacy fence where the existing security fence is now to
2
screen the construction site in lieu of installing the buffer landscaping per Condition 4. The
petitioner has not specifically proposed mitigation for the vegetation removed along Ryder Cup
Boulevard, but simply requests that the new landscape plan and all the site improvements amend
any past approvals, due to the difficulty in complying to previous approval. The proposed
landscape plan has more landscaping than originally approved.
The City Forester has stated that the new landscape plan proposes removal of the remaining
existing Ryder Cup buffer trees to implement the new landscape design. He has no problem with
the proposed landscape plan, but he is recommending denial of the petitioner's request to waive
Condition 12, because the northwest landscape buffer between the project and The Island of PGA
National development still remains. He has no concern with a privacy fence concept for screening
the construction site.
The City Forester also points out that there were some discrepancies between the approved site
plan and the approved landscape plan that are being clarified with this petition. Specifically, the
petitioner does not intend to install the nature trail in the northwestern landscape buffer area.
The PGA National Homeowner's Association has reviewed the proposed amendment and has
approved the plans with some minor changes to the new landscape plan.
At its January 13, 1998 meeting, the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee voted
unanimously (7 -0) to recommend approval of petition SP -97 -16 with the following conditions:
1. The support services within the central facility shall be available for the use only to residents
of the life care facility. Dining room facilities may also be used by guests.
2. No external signage regarding the support services as referenced shall be allowed for the
uses within the central facility.
3. Barriers shall be placed around the vegetation to be preserved (prior to and during the
construction phases) for protection.
4. The removal of all exotics (melaleuca, brazillian pepper and australian pine) from the site
and assurance of their elimination in perpetuity through the project's landscape
maintenance program shall be required.
5. To the extent that the density of the northwest buffer is diminished when the exotics are
removed, the developer will replace same with additional foliage of some type to the
satisfaction of the City Forester so as to maintain the buffer area.
6. The following contingency plan shall be enacted to replace those trees and palms that die
during or from construction within the northwest landscape buffer area: three inches of new
tree caliper will replace every one inch of caliper lost; palms to be replaced one - for -one.
Replacement shall be done prior to the first building Certificate of Occupancy or as deemed
appropriate by the City Forester.
3
7. Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for each building, the landscaping and
amenities around the building shall be inspected by the City Forester, and the Landscape
Architect of record.
8. Prior to scheduling this petition for a City Council meeting, the petitioner is required to
revise the landscape plan per PGA National Home Owner's Association's comments.
9. Prior to scheduling this petition for a City Council meeting, the proposed modifications have
to be reviewed and approved by the Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District.
10. Three (3) additional specialty paving details have been added to the paving plan prepared
by Corral- Howard Collaborative. The three details need to be revised to more specifically
call out the specifications noted in the "Grading and Drainage Notes on Sheets 10 of 13 of
the approved Engineering Plans" prepared by C.C.L. Consultants, Inc.
It should be indicated that in response to condition # 8, the petitioner has submitted revised
landscape plan per PGA National Home Owner's Association's comments. The petitioner has also
obtained approval from Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District and Seacoast Utility
Authority. Therefore, conditions # 8 and # 9 will be eliminated.
It should also be noted that the following conditions of Resolution 86, 1996, have been added to
the conditions recommended by the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee:
11. The new covered entry on the southeast corner of the building and the gatehouse shall
provide a clearance height of 13' -6 ", the same as all other entryways.
12. The security gates shall provide a clear opening width of 14 feet and shall be equipped with
a KNOX key switch for emergency access.
13. Project signage shall return for review and approval by the City's Growth Management
Department.
14. If the grass parking reserve is going to be utilized prior to being paved, the applicant shall
comply with Section 118 -478 entitled "Grassed Parking" of the City's Land Development
Regulations.
15. Water levels in the lakes shall be maintained by a methodology satisfactory to the City Staff
and City Engineer.
16. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, a lighting plan for the parking lot
which meets the criteria set forth in Section 118 - 474(4) entitled "Lighting ", of the City's Land
Development Regulations shall be provided.
4
4400 PGA Boulevard,
Suite 900
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
THE JOHN D. AND CATHERINE T.
MACARTHUR FOUNDATION
February 19, 1998
The Honorable Joseph R. Russo,
Mayor
City of Palm Beach Gardens
Local Planning Agency
10500 N. Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
Telephone: (561) 626 -4800
Re: Public Hearing February 19, 1998 Regarding EAR -Based Amendments and
Proposed Ordinance 4, 1998
Dear Joe,
The Foundation has reviewed and previously provided comments to your staff regard-
ing the EAR -based amendments. Substantial progress has been made through work-
ing with your staff on many issues. However, there are several issues that we still have
concerns over and which adversely affect the financial value of Foundation land hold-
ings. We request that the City Council sitting as the Local Planning Agency incorporate
the following recommendations and direct staff to continue working with Foundation
staff to resolve these issues. It is our expectation that during the Department of Com-
munity Affairs review, that additional changes will be possible. Below is a list of our
concerns:
Future Land Use Element - Mixed -Use Development (MXD) Page 1-4 and Pol-
icy 1.1.1.3, page 1 -11.
a) In our opinion, the mandatory requirement of residential land use in all
MXD developments may cause unintentional consequences. Residen-
tial uses may, in fact, be in conflict with existing uses. For example,
Foundation Parcel 5B that is located east of Loehmann's Plaza and
north of North Corp would be severely limited by this residential re-
quirement. Historically this area has been planned and developed as a
commercial /industrial area. Introducing residential into this area is in-
compatible with the commercial /industrial nature of this area and, in our
opinion, should be avoided instead of encouraged.
Secondly, the goals of MXD development, i.e., reduced traffic, integrated
land uses, and pedestrian orientation can be achieved without requiring
the residential component. For example, the Embassy Suites complex,
which consists of retail, office and hotel, meets many of the intended
functions of MXD but does not have a residential component.
b) Our second MXD -Use Development concern is in regard to the granting
of a waiver provision allowed in the current city comprehensive plan, but
not included in the EAR -based amendments. In the current plan, the
following provision provides a waiver opportunity:
... "However, the City Council may waive this provision upon a finding
that the intent of the MXD district can be met by a development with less
than three (3) use types. Such exceptions may include a single
owner /occupant of an entire (site) designated as MXD."
As you know, there are not many undeveloped sites in the City that allow
for new single -user office developments, i.e., Professional Office land
use designation. The MXD waiver provides a mechanism that allows a
major professional high wage - paying employer to relocate to the City
without a one -year wait to process a land use change.
The flexibility allowed by this current provision allows the Foundation to
respond to the market place and sell land. For example, recently AT &T
considered relocating 1,200 jobs to a Foundation parcel designated
MXD located in the City. The Foundation was able to offer this MXD -
designated site since the waiver provision would have allowed them to
proceed, if approved by the City Council. Although AT &T eventually de-
cided to relocate to Abacoa, there are other major corporations inter-
ested in moving to this community. We believe they would benefit from
this provision.
In our opinion, the current provision allows the City to be flexible and
proactive on certain parcels of land that have the location, roadway ac-
cess and other attributes to be major employment and commercial cen-
ters. Thus, we believe that the waiver provision should be included in the
new MXD.
2. Future Land Use Element DRI Vesting Language.
We request that language be incorporated into the comprehensive plan
that vests developments approved pursuant to Chapter 380.06 Florida
Statues, i.e., Developments of Regional Impacts (DRI) and amendments
to DRI's that are not substantial deviations.
Our primary concern is the Regional Center. The Regional Center DRI
has certain vested entitlements and assumed certain development order
obligations. There are several provisions in the proposed comprehen-
sive plan that will hamper development of Regional Center and not allow
it to be developed as currently approved.
Specifically, the maximum residential density of 12 dwelling units per
acre is less than the 15 dwelling units per acre approved in the DRI. If
the proposed maximum of 12 units per acre were imposed on the Re-
gional Center, the development will not be able to achieve the 1,600
residential units approved.
Another concern is the limit of two stories of professional offices adja-
cent to residential areas. Several Regional Center development parcels
are approved adjacent to residential areas. If these pods are limited to
two stories, there is not enough land to build the remaining one million
square feet of office space.
3. Land Use Element Policy 1.1.6.5(a).
In our opinion, the timing of the CRALLS request should be tied to the
letting of a construction contract for the PGA Blvd. /Alternate A1A urban
interchange as opposed to completion as currently proposed in the EAR
Based Amendments. We request that this be changed to be consistent
with the County Traffic Performance Standard ordinance and further will
allow the CRALLS request to be made two years earlier (2000/2001) as
opposed to 2002/2003 for completion.
4. Land Use Element Professional /Office, Pages 1 -2.
In our opinion, the maximum building height criteria of 36 feet is overly
restrictive. We believe that the building height should be equivalent to
the maximum, not greater than, the commercial land use building height.
5. Transportation Element Objective 2.1.2, Map O and Table 12A.
We believe that policies affecting roads identified on the Conceptual
Thoroughfare Plan should have additional flexibility. We recommend
that the option of being designated public or private should be incorpo-
rated into the policy, if the adjacent lands are owned by a single land
owner. In many cases, the roadways are located on Foundation hold-
ings that we believe are more likely to be developed as private gate -
housed communities. As you know, public roadways are not appropriate
nor compatible with gated communities.
6. Transportation Element Policy 2.1.3.1 - On- Street Parking Prohibited Neighbor-
hood Collectors.
On- street parking should be permitted and encouraged on neighborhood
collector roadways, not prohibited as now proposed. Current planning
trends, Florida Department of Transportation, and other state agencies
now encourage on- street parking. Security of residential neighborhoods
and traffic - calming techniques are additional reasons for encouraging
on- street parking.
7. Transportation Element Policy 2.1.6.2 and Map A, Future Land Use Map and
Map I, Conceptual Linkage Map.
We recommend that Hood Road Parkway between Prosperity Farms
Road and Florida's Turnpike should be limited to a 55 -foot width park-
way on both sides of the rights of way and not the 300 -400 feet as pro-
posed. Precedence has been established for a narrower parkway with
the approval of several recent projects such as Gardens Presbyterian
Church and the Temple Judea redevelopment plan. Further, there are
many existing developments (Westwood Gardens, KOA Campgrounds
and Seacoast Utility) that make it impossible to create a unified func-
tional parkway.
As a result of these existing developments, it will impossible to provide
the functionality intended for a 300 -400 foot parkway. As demonstrated
along PGA Boulevard east of Central Avenue, the 55 -foot parkway pro-
vides pedestrian and bike pathways as well as landscaping needs.
3
In regard to item seven of this policy, Future East -West Artery north of
PGA Boulevard and south of Hood Road, we recommend that the park-
way also be limited to 55 feet on both sides of the roadway, assuming
that the roadway will be needed.
8. Transportation Element Policy 2.1.6.4 - Parkway Widths.
In our opinion, parkway widths should be reduced from 300 -400 feet to
widths that will provide the functionality intended for the parkway. The
City should evaluate the need for these widths and determine if a 55-
foot parkway can provide the same benefits. As stated above, PGA
Boulevard east of Central Boulevard functions well in only 55 feet. It is
beautifully landscaped and the bike /pedestrian path provides ample lin-
ear park functions.
9. Infrastructure Element Reference to Policy 9.1:4.2. (d).
The requirement of a super- majority vote of the City Council to allow al-
ternative service mechanisms should be reconsidered. Further, in this
regard, an item in the comprehensive plan that requires a super - majority
is not necessary in our opinion. A simple majority, as is for the majority
of Council decisions, should be adequate for any comprehensive plan
items. Most major decisions, including the City's budget, are done on a
majority basis.
10. Conservation Element Policy 6.1.4.2 - Prohibited Commercial Mining.
Commercial fill operations are needed in the north county area to pro-
vide efficient and economical fill needs of the community. Currently, be-
cause of a lack of commercial mining operations in our area, much of
the fill used for construction of homes, offices, roadways and public
projects is imported from Palm City, Martin County and /or St. Lucie
County. Total prohibition of fill excavation inherently means less afford-
able housing, more expensive roads and public projects, as well as more
air pollution and diesel fuel to haul fill from areas outside the county. We
believe the City should provide fill mining operations to support the
community development needs.
The Foundation has potential fill sites and would be willing to collabora-
tively identify sites. With proper restrictions, the commercial mining op-
erations can be good neighbors and provide the fill needs for north
county developments.
11. Conservation Element Policy - Allowing Removal of Fill From Loxahatchee
Slough.
We recommend that a policy be incorporated that allows the removal of
fill and additional mining of fill from the C -18 canal located within the
Loxahatchee Slough. In fact, restoration of the slough may require re-
moval of fill from the C -18 Canal.
Secondly, as part of the financial compensation of the sale of Loxa-
chatchee Slough to the County, the Foundation retained a contractual
right to remove fill from the C -18 Canal. Thus, not allowing removal of
the fill is a financial loss to the Foundation. We request that the City in-
4
corporate a policy that recognizes and allows this mining -type operation
in that portion of the C -18 Canal located within the Loxahatchee Slough.
Although the Foundation believes we have completed a comprehensive review and
have identified most of the issues, we reserve the right to provide additional comments.
As stated in the first paragraph of this letter, we would like to continue working with you
and your staff during the Department of Community Affairs' review.
The Foundation recognizes that substantial progress has been made in resolving our
concerns. However, we believe that if the EAR -based amendments are adopted as
currently proposed, they would be contrary to contemporary development practices,
create inordinate burden on the Foundation, and thus dramatically reduce the Founda-
tion's ability to sell its property at current market value.
Sincerely
\Xk-,�Q
r
Dale E. Smith
Director of Florida Operations
cc: Vice Mayor Lauren Furtado
Councilwoman Linda Monroe
Councilman Eric Jablin
Councilman David Clark
City Manager Bobbie Herakovich
✓Director of Growth Management Roxanne Manning
Principal Planner Kimberly K. Glas- Castro
City Clerk, Linda V. Kosier
5
ERRATA
The following changes are additions to or modifications of those shown in st �1kc- :l-aug : and
underline format in the 2/19/98 Council packet. Staff recommends approval of these changes which
should be noted as modifications to the Comprehensive Plan (and Exhibit "A" of Ordinance 4, 1998)
in any motions made by the LPA or City Council.
Policy 7.1.2.1: The City shall cnacL continue a fully operational impact fee program
i Anv, and shall supplement recreation and open space needs through interlocal agreements,
operational practices, user fees, incentives, and public /private cooperative efforts. The City shall
also develop a comprehensive implementation program with priorities, responsibilities, and
schedules based on the adopted level of service standards (improved park land) and the ideal
recreation facilities standards by 3armary 4-,4-99-2 September 1, 1998.
Policy 2.1.2.3.: The City shall implement the Conceptual Thoroughfare Plan (Map O) to ensure
that there is an adequate network of public streets (City Collectors, Neighborhood Collectors and
Local Roads) to efficiently move traffic within the City and serve as a backup system to the County
thoroughfare roads . Actual alignments for these. public roadways will be established as part of the
development review process.
Transportation Element, definitions
TPSO Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, Supplement
Flo. 4. 10 -96
Policy 1.1.5.1.(a).1: For that area bounded by Florida's Turnpike to the east, PGA Boulevard
to the south, and the former (June 13,1989) city limits to the west, which generally coincide with
the eastern boundary of the Loxahatchee Slough and generally the northern alignment of the
Donald Ross Road extension, the City shall impose the following requirements, and shall maintain
- - - a -- _ - L - -- land
111 QI.%.V111Q11VG W1LL1 JV�r 11V11 1VJ.JLVL, 1'.J., 1C VJL%,W, QIlu 1GVIJV W11G1G 11�.�rGJJQ1 �',
development regulations necessary to implement these requirements.
1. All proposed development shall include a minimum of 250 acres which shall be rezoned
to Planned Community District (PCD) and contain, at a minimum, a master development
plan and supporting documentation which describes what the development is to include and
how it is to proceed (phasing). All proposed collector roads within the development shall
be shown as part of the PCD master plan. A waiver from the minimum size threshold may
be eranted by the City Council for recognized parcels of lesser size, or other hardship
circumstances..
I
n
2. Individual development "pods" within an approved PCD shall undergo site elan review
L. �___�_.1 a_ Tl____a TT_.a _�a TTT
VG 1GGV11cd to 11cuu1GLL Vlul LGYG1ViJU1G111 �� VD) which shall include, at a minimum, site
plans, landscape plans, and all proposed local roads.
3. The overall density of PCDs in this area shall not exceed the maximum density permitted
under the land use category.
4. Up to 2% of the gross land area of a PCD may be developed for commercial or office use.
5. Up to 5 % of the gross land area of a PCD may be developed for commercial or office use
if significantly large areas (10% or more) of native ecological habitats are preserved within
the PCD over and above those preserve or open space areas which may be required as a
minimum. Such habitat preservation areas shall be confined to only a few large areas,
rather than scattered throughout, and shall be connected to the _parkway i u%�iiiaili11aLuiv
Thy system.
6. If the entire area covered in this policy is developed under one PCD master development
plan, an additional 50 acres of commercial land use may be permitted over and above the
2 % and 5 % criteria described previously.
7. Up to 2% of the gross land area of a PCD may be developed for industrial uses.
8. All PCDs shall be subject to the provisions of the Conceptual Linkage Plan for Northwest
Palm Beach Gardens as described in this Future Land Use: Transportation. and
Conservation elements.
9. The master development _plan shall be consistent with and implement the City's Conceptual
Thoroughfare Plan.
Policy 1.1.5.3.: For that area designated as Industrial on the Future Land Use Map bounded by
PGA Boulevard to the south, the Florida East Coast Railroad to the east, and I -95 to the west, the
City shall impose the following requirements, and shall maintain , 111 Wiul scaivou
T-1 C4 ____:_ � ___.__ ___L___ y, land development regulations which are
1VJ.JLVG 1'.J. 1GY1GW Q114 1GY1JG W11G1G 11000JJCU
necessary to implement these requirements:
1. No vehicular access shall be permitted across the north boundary of the site.
2. Site design shall incorporate significant setbacks from the surfacewater area formally
designated open space (ROS) u%-;;uj--L%-,aL%-,u YuN-LIc casc111G.111, which separates the parcel from
those to the north, and include buffering techniques to mitigate impacts on adjacent land
uses.
el ..
f
N
Policy 9.1.4.2.(a): The City hereby adopts the following Level of Service Standards (LOS) and
will use them in reviewing the impacts of new development upon facility provision. The Dual Level
of Service Standards shall be applied in the respective urban and rural areas, consistent with the
Urban Growth Boundary nhilosonhv established in the Future Land Use Element:
TRAFFIC CIRCULATION
Facilitv Tvne
Neiehborhood Collector
Citv Collector
Countv MipQr Arterial
State Minor Arterial
State Principal Arteri?j
FIRS Roads
Excepted Links De; Taklp 2A
SEWAGE SERVICE
SOLID WASTE
Generation Der capita:
Collection:
DRAINAGE
WATER SERVICE
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
URBAN AREA
RURAL AREA
LOS for Peak Period in Peak Season
D D
D D
D D
E E
D D
D D
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
PUBLIC SAFETY
Fire /EMS
Police:
SANITARY SEWER
107 eallons D_ er day_
Der capita
7.13 1bs Der dav
Twice per week
3 day. 25 vear event
POTABLE WATER
191 eallons _per dav
Der capita
3.7 acres of improved
neiehborhood and
community Darks
Der 1.000 Dermanent
residents
5 minute response
time to 90% of all
calls. on a district basis
1150 service calls Der officer
Der vear:
Communitv Policine PhilosoDhv
SEPTIC TANKS
Per DEP and Public
Health Department Regulations
7.13 lbs Der day
Once Der week
3 day. 25 vear event
WATER WELLS
Per DEP and Public
Health Department RegWations
Park and recreatioiR
facilities will be located
to serve the entire city _
Dopulation. and in most
cases will be in the urban area.
Reauire well -based
sprinklers for all
siructures: fire service with tanker
trucks: 8 minute averaee response
time,, - -
Zone Datrol based on ru ral
crime control strateeies
LPA Public Hearing
EAR -Based Amendments
Recommendation to City Council
(See packet under Ordinance 4, 1998)
V
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
Growth Management Department
Planning and Zoning Division
Comprehensive Planning and Special Projects Section
MFMORANDUM
Date: February 5, 1998
TO: Linda Kosier
City Clerk
Greg Dunham
Assistant City Manager
From: Kim Glas -Castro
Principal Planner
Subject: Legal Advertisement
The attached public notice is being hand delivered by Growth Management staff to the Palm
Beach Post for publication.
LPA/City Council meeting:
Agenda Item:
February 19, 1998
Public Hearing - EAR -Based Amendments
Remember, the LPA will need to convene, hold a public hearing on the petition, and make a
recommendation for Council consideration.
NOTICE OF CHANGE OF LAND USE
AND POLICIES GOVERNING THE USE OF LAND
PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
STATE OF FLORIDA
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that a Public Hearing will be conducted by the Local
Planning Agency of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, on Thursday, February 19, 1998 at
7:30 P.M. or as soon thereafter as can be heard, in the Council Chambers at the Municipal Complex,
10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, for the purpose of making formal
recommendation to the City Council concerning changes to the Palm Beach Gardens Comprehensive
Plan. Under consideration are EAR -based amendments which affect policies and regulations
governing the use of land within the City, as well as changes in land use designations. The proposed
amendments potentially affect all of the City, as shown on the map:
(Insert Map Here)
Site - specific land use changes include:
• designation of Frenchman's Forest ecosite with Conservation land use
(a change from RL land use to CON land use on ±157 acres)
• designation of Loxahatchee Slough ecosite with Conservation land use
(a change from RR10, RR20, RL, CR, VLR, and IND land uses to CON land use on ±5,410
acres)
• designation of Lilac Street park with Recreation and Open Space land use
(a change from RM land use to ROS land use on +10 acres)
• designation of `HillTop' acquisition with Public land use
(a change from RM land use to P land use on ±6 acres)
• correction of a scrivener's error on the Nativity Lutheran Church property
(a change from C land use to RM land use on ±2.5 acres)
• depiction of existing I- 95/Donald Ross Road interchange
WAIN
77�--
elimination of the PDA Land Use Overlay
The Local Planning Agency will make a formal recommendation to the City Council on the
proposed amendments and the transmittal of these Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan for the
City of Palm Beach Gardens to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for their
Determination of Compliance /Consistency with Statutory Requirements.
Following the Public Hearing, the City Council will hold a public hearing to consider the Local
Planning Agency's recommendation and to transmit the Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
for the City of Palm Beach Gardens to the Florida Department of Community Affairs.
All documents pertaining to said petition are on file in the Planning and Zoning Division of the
Growth Management Department and may be reviewed by members of the public during normal
business hours, 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. All members of the public are
invited to attend and participate in said meeting.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any interested person desires to appeal any
recommendation made by the City Council with respect to any matter considered at this hearing,
such interested persons will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal is to be based.
LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC
CITY CLERK
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLEASE PUBLISH: February 12, 1998
The Palm Beach Post
Advertisement shall be no less than 2 columns wide by 10 inches long, placed in a portion of the
newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements do NOT appear, and the headline in the
advertisement shall be of type no smaller than 18 point.
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
10500 N. MILITARY TRAIL • PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 334144698
INTER OFFICE MEMO
Date: January 27, 1998
To: Bobbie Herakovich, City Manager
From: Peter T. Bergel, Acting Fire Ch'
RE: Public Education Award
This memo is written to request the Fire Department be placed on the February 19th
Council Agenda for the purpose of receiving the Award for Excellence in Community
Public Education Programs from the Florida Fire Chiefs Association. I have arranged for
a representative from the Fire Chiefs to be in attendance at this meeting. I thank you in
advance for your anticipated cooperation in this matter. Should you have any additional
questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
cc: file
V. Wade
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Presentation of Public Education Award
Subject/Agenda Item
Recommendation/Motion:
Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Costs: $ 0
City Attorney FIRE Total
Finance $
Current FY
ACM
Human Res. Advertised: Funding Source:
Other
Date: [ ] Operating
Paper. [ ] Other
Date: January 27, 1998
Council Action:
[ ] Approved
[ ] Approved wi, ..=6—
[ ] Denied
( ] Continued to:
Attachments:
I
Submitted by: [K ] Not Required
Peter Bergel
Department Director Affected parties Budget Acct #::
Approved by: [ ] Notified [ ] None
City Manager [ ] Not required
BACKGROUND:
Presentation to Fire Department of Award for Excellence in Community Public
Education Programs. Award will be presented by the Florida Fire Chiefs
Association
-�
OPP-
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
Agenda Item & Cover Memorandum
Date: February 09, 1998
SubjectlAgenda Item: Award of Bid and Approval of Agreement with Center for Family
services for EAP Program
Recommendation/Motiow Award of Bid and Agreement for Services - Year 1/1/98 thru
12/31/98. Attached Signature Page for City Mgr / Designee.
Reviewed By:
Originating
COST: =$8,112.00
City Council's Action:
Dept.:
— - - - - -__
[X]City Attorney:
Current FY.Amt.
[ ]Approved
Human Resources
Within Budget
[X]Finance:
Funding Source:
[ ]Approvedw/Conditions^
Budget - 1997 -98
(See Attached Conditions /Directives)
(X]ACM:
[OPERATING
[ ] Denied
[X]Human Res:
Date
[ ]Continued To:
( ]Other:
[OTHER
Date
Submitted By: James T.
Advertised:
Budget Acct*
Attachments: (List by Letter or
Waldron / Directo
Paper:
01 -0300-
Number)
[ X ] Required
513.3150
Approved By:
Affected Parties:
[ X ] Notified
Date: 02/09/98
(EAP - Rep.)
[ ] Not Required
BACKGROUND: The Center for Family Services` Employee Assistance Program exist to
create a safe and productive workplace by enhancing the individual's quality of life through
education, counseling and related services.
REQUEST:
1. Approval by City Manager/Designee of attached agreement with The Center for Family
Services for the Contract Year of January 1, 1998 through December 31, 1998, with no
(3) Agenda Cover Memo - Cont.
increase in fees per employee as written in attached 1998 - Agreement, Section -VIII.
2. Signature of City Manager or Designee on Two(2) Copies of the Original Contract.
3. Contact the Human Resources Department when prepared for signature and distribution.
4. Cost is an estimate based on a projection of previous years usage which includes, the
number of actual sessions, and other treatment.
(4) Agenda Cover Memo- Cont.
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
10500 N. MILITARY TRAIL • PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410 -4696
TO: CITY COUNCII,
THRU: CITY MANAGER
FROM: JIM WALDRO HL OF HUMAN RESOURCES
DATE: February 09, 1998
SUBJ: AWARDING OF BID / AGREEMENT WITH THE CENTER FOR
FAMILY SERVICES
As you are aware, the City has bid this service in the past and found that there are not enough
agencies available, with:
1.) the variety of employee services and
2.) adequate locations to render comprehensive service to the employees of the City, and
3.) at a rate that is within budget.
This year the City bid this service and only two interested persons called, and only one agency
submitted a bid, "The Center For Family Services ".
The proposal form confirms my conversation as reported earlier, that there will be no increase in
the fee of $2.60 per employee per month, and all other terms and conditions of our current
Agreement remain in effect.
The beginning date of this contract is from January 1, 1998 thru December 31, 1998. See
attached backup documents.
The services rendered to employees have been commendable, based on feedback which I have
received. Additionally, all services of this agency are slated for review and improvements based
on my recent conversations with the executive Director, and Co- Director.
Signature page is 46 of the backup document after appropriate approvals.
I recommend that the City Manager and City Council approve this Agreement.
I have notified a Representative of the organization to be available for questions regarding the
services of the agency if calendar(s) will allow.
cc: City Council
City Mgr.
EAP File 98
HUMAWRESOURCESiP.B.G. Fax:14077751025 Jan 7 '98 16:48 P.11
PROPOSAL FORM /
In completing the information questions below, if additional space is needed, attachments to this
form are acceptable.
( ) Individual ( ) Partnership ( x ) Corporation ( ) Other (Specify)
CO>tipany The Center for Family Services of PBC, Inc. ,_ Organized Date 1961
(Or Individual)
471 Spencer Drive West Palm Beach FL
Address City - State
Phone ## (561) 616 -1222 Tax I.D. ## 59- 1084179
Proposer's Representative David A. Vacca _
Title President / Executive Director
33409 - _ _
Zip Code
Fee per employee per month S 2.60
Supervisory training sessions, other than the initial session
provided for in Section C(4) $ 150 hriy
Additional services. including employee seminars $ 150 hrly
PRICES SET FORTH ABOVE ARE FIRM PROPOSALS AND ARE NOT SUBJECT TO PRICE
ADJUSTMENT EXCEPT AS DEFINED IN THE GENERAL AND TECHNICAL
SPECIFICATIONS.
ATTEST:
Shirley Henderson, LMHC, CEAP, CAP
zj"
Signature
Co- Director, EAP
Title
January 31, 1998
Date
(Corporate Seal)
PROPOSER:
David A. Vacca
Signature
President / Executive Director
January 31Ti1y98
Date
i
HUMAN-RESOURCES/P.B.G. Fax :14077751025 Jan 7 '98 16:49 P.12
APPENDIX A
IDRUGFREE WORKPLACE FORM
The undersigned vendor in accordance with Florida Statute 287.087 hereby certifies that
The Center for Family Services of PBC, Inc. does 0 e not (circle appropriate
response):
(Name of Business)
1. Publish a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution,
dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the workplace and
specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition.
2. Inform employees about the danger of drug abuse in the workplace, the business's policy of
maintaining a drug -free workplace, any available drug counseling.
10
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM
Mission Statement:
The Center for Family Services' Employee Assistance Program exists to create a safe and
productive workplace by enhancing the individual's quality of life through education,
counseling and related services.
Vision Statement:
The Center for Family Services' Employee Assistance Program is committed to partnering
with employers to provide a safe and productive workplace through confidential counseling,
training, conflict mediation, crisis intervention services and management support.
What is an EAP?
An Employee Assistance Program is an employer sponsored program for employees and
their immediate family members (dependents) to obtain help with personal problems that
can and do affect work and home life.
l
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (EAP)
MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
CITY PALM BEACH GARDENS
James T. Waldron, Jr.
Human Resource Department
10500 N. Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, 775 -8200
The Center For Family Services of Palm Beach County, Inc.
Employee Assistance Program
Shirley Henderson, LMHC, CEAP, C.A.P.
Thomas Connelly, M.Ed., LD.A.C.D., CAP.
Co- Directors- Employee Assistance Program
471 Spencer Drive
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
(561) 616 -1250 FAX (561) 616 -1230
February 3, 1998, 2:00 p.m.
.60r7WC -4.0 mil'` V e/
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM (EAP)
MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
LETTER, OF TRANSMITTAL:
THE CENTER FOR FAMILY SERVICES OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, INC., (here in called
The Center) per your request, wishes to submit a proposal to CITY OF PALM BEACH
GARDENS (herein called The City) to provide a full service Employee Assistance Program
(EAP) and Drug -Free Workplace Program (DFWP) for the benefit of THE. CITY Employees
and/or dependents. The Center will provide these services in a professional and timely manner.
Those persons authorized to make representations for THE CENTER FOR FAMILY
SERVICES OF PALM. BEACH COUNTY, INC. are:
Halsey Smith, Jr., President - Board of Directors
The Center for Family Services
505 South Flagler Drive, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 833 -6650
David A. Vacca, President / Executive Director
} The Center for Family Services
471 Spencer Drive
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 (561) 616 -1250
Shirley Henderson, LMHC, CEAP, CAP Co- Director — EAP Program
Thomas Connelly, M.ed., I.D.A.C.D., C.AP.- Co4hrector — EAP Program
471 Spencer Drive
The Center for Family Services
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 (561) 616 -1252
The above named individuals are the principals representing THE CENTER FOR
FAMILY SERVICES OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, INC. This proposal is made
without collusion with any other person or entity.
David A. Vacca
President / Executive Director
Date
The Center for Family Services is the oldest and largest FULL SERVICE Employee
Assistance Program (EAP) based in Palm Beach County. The Center has been
offering EAP services for over fourteen (14) years and currently serves over 150
organizations in the county, covering over :100,000 employees and dependents.
The Center's EAP corporate customers range in size from ten (10) employees to over
fifteen thousand (15,000) employees and represent a broad diversity of firms (e.g.
health care, manufacturing, utilities, government, banking, education, transportation,
and Comm_ _unications). With fourteen (14) years experience, the Center has gained an
understanding and appreciation of the complexity and unique needs of each
organization served.
The Center's approach and philosophy is based on a belief that EAP services must be
customized to meet the specific needs of each EAP client / organization. This
commitment to meeting client needs has proven effective as seen by the fact the
Center for Family Services has a 98% EAP CONTRACT RENEWAL RATE OVER
THE LAST THREE YEARS. (Exhibitl)
Since the inception of the Employee Assistance Program, the Center has conducted
ongoing follow -up client satisfaction surveys. These surveys reveal that 96% rank
their overall EAP services satisfaction as excellent or good. Ninety -eight percent
(98 %) of these employees surveyed indicate they would recommend the Center's
EAP to their co- workers or families. In addition to a long history of employee
satisfaction and an exceptional renewal rate, supervisors and managers continue to
express a high level of satisfaction when making management referrals.
A recent MANAGEMENT REFERRAJ, SATISFACTION SURVEY of corporate
managers and supervisors making referrals ranked the EAP staff's handling of the
referrals as excellent (68%) or good (32 %). Manager comments in this survey
included:
"It's therefor people who need it and the result over the years has been
favorable. "
"Additional resource to assist me in the effective managing of our Human
Resources. "
"Having available professionals to provide confidential help, located close to our
employees, is one of the best offered benefits. "
"The responsiveness of the EAP staff and quality of services provided are
excellent —keep up the great _ job. Thank you! "
"Good service, ability to assist within a reasonable period of time. " (Exhibit 2)
0"',
A. DEFINITIONS
1. ELIGIBILITY
The Employee Assistance / Mental Health services covers all full -time employees
of The City of Palm Beach Gardens and eligible family members. Family
members include employee's spouse, an employee's unmarried children under the
age of 19, and an employee's unmarried children under the age of 21 who are full-
time students. Employee / eligible family members shall be entitled to a total of
six (6) counseling sessions per family per contract year.
2. EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
The Center's EAP is designed to assist the employee or dependent (client) to
access their EAP benefits as smoothly as possible. The client calls one telephone
number and speaks directly to a master's level professional who will determine
the best therapist suited for the individual's problem, the most convenient CFS
office location for the individual and make the appointment at the same time.
There are also outpatient substance abuse programs at three of our offices. The
therapists work for the same agency as the EAP department. The EAP
department is made up of two co- directors and support staff whose sole focus is
employee assistance. The EAP staff is available to the employer and / or client
twenty -four hours.
The Center's EAP is based on a social model to encompass family community
and other issues such as work, childcare and elder care. The Center's EAP is
concerned with employee and employer interdependence as well as the endemic
problems of the organization, such as downsizing, cultural diversity, and
violence in the workplace.
B. SCOPE OF T" EAP SERVICES
Provide Assessment,, Diagnostic & treatment or referral ServiceQ
The Center offers a full range of counseling, assessment and / or referral services to
address behavioral, medical, substance abuse, mental health, family, financial, legal or
other personal problems.
All of the above are provided directly by The Center with the exception of legal issues
and financial concerns. Clients' legal issues are referred to the Palm Beach County Bar
Association Lawyer Referral Service (Exhibit 3). Clients with financial difficulties are
referred to the Consumer Credit Counseling Services (Exhibit 4), also a United Way
Agency. When other types of outside services are clinically appropriate, employees and
their families will be referred to the most cost effective service possible.
1. Management Referrals
The EAP administrators will provide quality case management by monitoring the
treatment progress made by management referred employees in programs to which they
have been referred. Consultation with an employee's supervisor, as laws of confidentiality_
oermit, will occur to communicate compliance with a recommended course of action on
Pk
management referrals. A description of referral procedures and case management
policies are provided (Exhibit 5).
2. Case Management
There are several different case management processes to ensure that services have been
delivered appropriately. It involves both the clinical and administrative oversight and
review.
EAP Co- Director ensures that The Center delivers services to EAP recipients in
compliance with the employer's contract / agreement.
■ The Quality Assurance Team reviews cases for assessment, diagnosis, treatment,
prognosis and outcomes.
• The EAP Co- Director provides quality case management by monitoring the
treatment progress made by management referred employees in programs to which
they have been referred. Consultation with an employee's supervisor, as laws 9f
Confidentiality hermit, will occur to communicate compliance with a recommended
course of action on management referrals.
• The Center's Substance Abuse Professional (SAP) provides case management in
compliance with Title 49 CFR, Part 40, DOT.
• The EAP Co-Director provides case management for cases that develop into extended
treatment beyond the short term counseling perimeters.
3. Family Related Counseling
With the family problems that today's family members face, we are aware of the
tremendous impact on an employee and his ability to function optimally both at home and
at work. Those situations can be caused by marriage / divorce problems, difficult parent /
child situations, elder care responsibilities and other concerns. Our services address these
situations, up to and including domestic violence and drug and alcohol dependencies.
4. Work Related Counseling
In the workplace, employee face myriad stressors, such as: bum out, conflict with peers,
productivity problems, the stress of shift work, and even traumatic stress secondary to
workplace crises and violence.
5. Critical Incident Stress Debriefing
The Center has a CID (Critical Incident Stress Debriefing) team available. This clinical
team is trained and experienced in dealing with traumatic events in the workplace (e.g.
employee fatality at work, bank robberies, natural disasters) and can respond on short
notice. Last year the CID team provided work site debriefing and counseling over fifteen
times. The Center's CID response has been an invaluable service to our EAP
corporations at rimes when employees have been exposed to traumatic situations.
6. Drug -Free Work Place
Provides turnkey Drug -Free Workplace Programs that offer education, assessment,
treatment and support to be in compliance with State of Florida Statute 440.102. Meet
Florida Department of Labor Objectives and Standards and U.S. Department of
Transportation Regulations. Drug -Free Workplace Act 1988, Title Omnibus
Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991, 41 USCA Section 70, Drug -Free
,¢�-,pcX",� ��
Workplace requirements for federal contractors, and Department of Transportation, Title
49 CFR Part 40.
The Center's Drug -Free Workplace mission is to assist Palm Beach County employers in
providing a drug -free work environment which will benefit the employer, the employee
and the community by adding competitive value to business functions, enabling
employers to operate at lower costs, and to provide a safer work environment.
We are proud of the opportunity to provide for Palm Beach County employers the tools
necessary to establish and maintain a drug -free workplace environment for employees
and customers. The Center is licensed by the Florida State Department of Health and
Rehabilitative Services as an outpatient drug and alcohol treatment facility. The Center's
Employee Assistance Program (EAP) provides managers and supervisors with a
constructive way to help employees, while reducing the high cost to the company when
these problems interfere with an employee's job performance. More specifically the
Center offers Drug -Free Workplace services which include:
• Comprehensive Drug -Free Workplace start -up manual (see Appendix for
manual outline) which includes all policies and forms required by law
• Employee and supervisory training workshops (Exhibit 6)
• Video on legal requirements of Drug -Free Workplace (DFWP)
• Reduced rates for The Center's state licensed Employee Assistance Program
• Reduced rates for drug testing by qualified National Institute of Drug Abuse
(NIDA) lab
• Telephone consultation, as needed
• On -site program compliance review and consultation
• Camera ready logo and promotional materials
• Up to five percent (5 %) discount on Workers' Compensation rates for
qualifying programs U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulations
reasonable suspicion training for supervisors (Title 49 CFR, Part 40)
• Comprehensive clinical substance abuse assessment and treatment, when
indicated, for employees either self- referred or management referred
C. OTHER EAP SERVICES
EAP training can be provided by the Center (Exhibit 7). Of special importance is training
in regard to reasonable suspicion of controlled substance abuse and/or alcohol misuse as
mandated in the Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act (OTETA) of 1991, Title
49, Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 391 and 40, as well as assisting the City in
complying with all mandates to Drug- Free Workplace Act 440.102 Florida Statutes.
Technical assistance in the development of EAP policies & procedures
Case management (coordination of community resources, follow -up and case
advocacy)
Referral to specialized services offered by The Center, but required by an
em ployee/eligible family member
19Trx a r4.-;p49
• One 2 -hour Supervisory EAP Training and one 2 -hour Drug Free Workplace
Training Session for supervisory personnel to sensitize them to the services of The
Center and to instruct them on using the services (Exhibit 8)
■ Telephone consultation with EAP staff or The Center as necessary
• On -site consultation by The Center staff in those cases where The Center deems it
necessary
• Priority for EAP appointments
• One employee EAP Orientation and Training
Workplace Orientation and Training (Exhibit 9)
• EAP Newsletter (Exhibit 10)
• EAP Promotional Materials (Exhibit 11)
and one employee Drug-Free
D. TERMS OF THE ENGAGEMENT
The term will commence on April 1, 1998 and terminate on September 30, 1999.
E. SERVICE LOCATIONS
To assure accessibility and convenience for the City's employees, The Center for Family
Services operates five clinical offices in Palm Beach County. The following are their
location:
5499 North Federal Highway, Suite E
Boca Raton, Florida 33487
114400 Okeechobee Rd., Ste. 216
Royal Palm Beach, Florida 33411
471 Spencer Drive 12300 Alternate Route AlA, Ste. 203
West Palm Beach. Florida 33409 Palm Beach Garden$, Florida 33410 -
Positively Speaking
607 South Main Street, Ste. 102
Belle Glade, FL 33430
The Center has counseling offices in Palm Beach GardenA, Wes_ t jPa M BpACh_ Boca "qn
Royal Palm ,$each, Belle Glade and an administrative office in West Palm Beach; the staff
numbers 70. Counselors have Ph.D. or Masters degrees in clinical areas of psychology,
marriage and family therapy or social work.
F. METHOD OF INTAKE
The Center provides employees and their families a live answered twenty -four hour
telephone service for initial contact, referral information and crisis intervention. This
service is provided by on -call Masters level clinical staff twenty -four hours per day,
seven days per week. All staff are licensed and trained in the areas of alcohol, drug and
mental health problems and clinical emergencies. A telecommunication device for the
deaf is available for the hearing impaired. During normal hours of operation, employees
needing to be seen on an emergency basis are seen the same day. Within 24 hours of an
initial call, the proposer will notify employees/eligible family members of an
appointment time to occur within five (5) working days. In addition to The Center's
twenty -four hour telephone service for employees and their families, the EAP
Department staff is available (via beeper) to management for consultations on a twenty -
four hour emergency basis.
The Center provides office hours Monday through Thursday, 9:00 A.M.- 9:00 P.M.;
Friday, 9:00 A.M. -5:00 P.M.; and Saturday 9:00 A.M. -2:00 P.M. Our experience has
shown that providing evening and weekend hours are essential to assure accessibility.
The offices are adequately staffed and are capable of ensuring that appointments can be
given within 24 hours of the request; employees in clinical crisis will be seen that day.
G. EMPLOYEE AWARENESS
The Center will provide customized literature to publicize the EAP benefits among
employees and dependents. Literature will be provided for all new employees. Every
effort will be made to help the employees feel confident that confidentiality must be
adhered to at the Center as mandated both in state and federal statutes. Taking into
account that this measure of trust does not occur immediately. The Center will provide to
each employee an EAP Newsletter. The articles are focused on current workplace issues.
H. REPORTING
The Center's computerized office automation system logs, incoming calls, notifies the
appropriate counselors, allows for appointment scheduling, provides the form for
telephone intakes, provides the database management for all treatment and case
management. The system allows the counselor to match the most appropriate resource to
the client's needs immediately, provides reporting, and is networked from an IBM AS400
main frame computer. These are backed up nightly. Software includes Peachtree, Word
for Windows, Microsoft Office, Excel, and a BTI program designed for The Center. The
office management system was upgraded in 1996. EAP personal computers are IBM
compatible, 586, 120 MHz. Client files are level- password protected, and only
authorized persons may access the case files or a particular client file.
The Center will provide annual status reports to monitor and document the effectiveness
of the EAP benefits. The annual status report will be in a format that maintains strict
confidentiality regarding individual participation. The annual status report will include
but is not limited to the following types of data:
• The number of employees and dependents participating in the program by employee
group.
• The number of voluntary self - referrals as distinguished from the number of formal
management referrals.
• The number of males/females participating in the program.
• The types of problem diagnosis broken down by category.
• The results of treatment by category including the number
• Total new cases for the contract year
• EAP cases open at the end of the contract year
• Completing treatment
• Cases referred to EAP benefits
,ej WCX 70�/�
• Cooperating with treatment
■ Cases referred for non -EAP benefits
■ EAP counseling sessions provided during the contract year
■ EAP cases closed during the contract year
The annual status report will be utilized to demonstrate the effectiveness and success of
the EAP benefits.
Monthly reports will be provided and will include:
• Existing clients
• New clients
• Clients closed
• Total clients open at end of month
• Total sessions provided in the current month
• Contract year to date new clients
• Contract year to date total sessions
Quality Assurance Utilization Review - The Center for Family Services has a strong
commitment to provide quality services to its clients. The Center's quality assurance plan
is an ongoing process which monitors and evaluates EAP clinical services.
The three primary goals of the Quality Assurance Program are:
■ To ensure that the quality of given to clients is consistently high.
■ To ensure geographical, temporal, financial and psychological Accessibility to Center
services.
• To identify and correct deficiencies in the delivery of Center services.
A complete description of the EAP Quality Improvement Plan, peer review and
utilization review (Exhibits 12, 13, 14).
L CONFIDENTIALITY
Confidential files are maintained on all clients using The Center's services. The Center
for Family Services has extensive policies and procedures which safeguard client
confidentiality. These procedures are authorized under Florida Statues 395.202; Federal
Register 42 The Center, Part 2; and Florida parental consent laws.
All confidential client files are maintained in a secured filing cabinet in a locked office
when unattended. All confidential client files that are obsolete and/or confidential data
are shredded prior to being discarded.
Contents of client's confidential files cannot be disclosed without the client's knowledge,
approval and written consent. Except in the case of known child abuse and/or clear and
imminent danger to self or others. In such cases reporting can only be done on a need to
ktow basis, as the law permits.
wv.i,,Ou ,C,W� #i z
Perhaps the best indication of The Center's commitment to client confidentiality is the
fact that, in the 34 -year history of this agency, no litigation has occurred against The
Center for breach of client confidentiality (Exhibit 15).
J. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PARTIES
The Center's relationship to the City created by this Proposal is that of an independent
contractor and not an employee, agent, partner or joint venturer with the City. The City
is only interested in the results of the Center's performance under this Agreement. No
agent, employee or servant of the Center, including the EAP Director will be or will be
deemed to be, the employee, agent or servant of the City and the City agrees not to hire
any such individual during the course and duration of this Proposal. The Center shall
assume all responsibility for the payment of wages and benefits to its agents, employees,
and servants, if any, for services performed by them under this Proposal. None of the
benefits provided by the City to its employees, including, with limitation, compensation
insurance and unemployment insurance, will be available to the Center or its agents,
employees or servants. The Center will assume full responsibility for the payment of all
federal, state and local taxes or other contributions imposed or required under
unemployment, social security and income tax laws, with respect to the Center's
engagement by the City under this Proposal.
K. CONTINUATION OF SERVICES
Should the counseling needs exceed the designated number of sessions allowed pursuant
to Section K or should this Proposal terminate pursuant to Section K or by non - renewal,
employees/eligible family members may elect to convert to the Center's fee schedule
without interruption of counseling sessions and shall be responsible for their own fees.
Upon termination of an employee, the employeeteligible family member receiving
services may also convert to the Center's' fee schedule and shall be responsible for
her/his own fees.
1. TERMINATION
This Proposal is subject to termination, prior to its expiration, upon either party
delivering to the other a written notice of intention to terminate this Proposal, which shall
become effective ninety (90) days thereafter. Unless otherwise terminated by either
party, this Proposal is to be renegotiated at the end of each contract period.
M. ASSIGNMENT
The Center for Family Services shall not assign or subcontract its rights or obligations
under this proposal without the prior consent of the City.
x7 1,3
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Date: January 26, 1998
Subject/Agenda Item
purchase of 1 ton dump truck for Roads & Drainage Division of Public Works -
Recommendation /Motion:
Purchase vehicle for $29,586.00 from Ed Morse Fleet Sales'Off of P.B. C6unty
contract 498- 035 /PP
Reviewed by:
Originating Dept:
Costs: $ 29 � 586.00
Council Action:
City Attorney
Public Works
Total
[ ]Approved
Finance
$ 30,0 00.00
ai
[ ] Approved wi mnau
Current FY
ACM
[ ] Denied
Advertised:
Funding Source:
[ ] Continued to:
Human Res.
Attachments:
Date:
(] Operating
Other
Paper.
[X] Not Required
[ Iq Other Fleet
Management Fund
Submitted by: �� `7
Bob Patty
Department Director
Affected parties
[ ] Notified
Budget Acct #:: 031 -
3020- 539.4610
[ ] None
Approved by:
City Manager
[ x] Not required
BACKGROUND:
yl
TO:
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
10S00 N. MILITARY TRAIL • PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 334104698
MEMORANDUM
Greg Dunham, Assistant City Manager
FROM: Bob Patty, Director of Public Works R 1'.')
DATE: January 26, 1998
SUBJECT: Purchase of vehicle for Roads & Drainage Division of Public Works
We have two vehicles left to purchase for the 1997/1998 fiscal year. One is for the
Public Works Department, which is a one ton class dump truck. This vehicle is available
under contract through Palm Beach County Fleet Management. Per their contract #98-
035/PP we can purchase the vehicle from Ed Morse Fleet Sales for $29,586.00.
The Fleet Management Fund has budgeted $30,000.00 under account #031 -3020-
539.6410. The vehicle is to be used by the Roads & Drainage Division. The vehicle
exceeds all of our minimum specifications.
I am therefore requesting that Council consider a motion to approve the purchase of this
vehicle from Ed Morse Fleet Sales at a cost of $29,586.00. As always, I will make
myself available as necessary to answer any questions you may have in this matter.
cc
Al Perkins, Supervisor of Vehicle/Equipment Maintenance
file
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
CITY COUNCIL
WORKSHOP MEETING
JANUARY 29, 1998
The January 29, 1998, Workshop Meeting of the City Council of the
City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, was called to order at 6:30 p.m.
in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex located at
10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida; and opened
with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL: The following elected officials were found to be in attendance: Mayor
Joseph R. Russo, Vice Mayor Lauren W. Furtado, Councilwoman
Linda Monroe, Councilman Eric Jablin and Councilman David Clark.
PRESENTATIONS:
Municipal Complex Update City Manager Herakovich stated that representatives from Architect
Design Group were in attendance tonight to present a progress report
and review specifics of the layout of the municipal complex and
answer-any questions.
Kevin Ratigan with Architects Design Group presented the Council
with an agenda of the items to be discussed. The first item on the
agenda was the status of the project and an update, second item were
issues associated with the council assembly chamber, minority
business bidding process and the roof. Mr. Ratigan stated that Bill
Mignogna the construction manager was in attendance and Paul
Friedman, Management Administrator, who would discuss the
minority bidding procedures.
Mr. Ratigan stated that the schedule had been revised after a meeting
with staff and the construction manager. He stated that staff would
be reviewing the work in more detail for the City. Mr. Ratigan stated
that the schedule was generated in order to start the recreation facility
after the season ends using that as the drop dead date to began
construction, and also to determine the time frame for issuance of
permits in order to have them in place before the start of construction.
Mr. Ratigan stated that the formal submittal to Planning and Zoning,
which will be reviewed by the Development Review Committee at
February 3, 1998 meeting, would be presented to the Planning and
Zoning Commission at the February 10, 1998 meeting. Mr. Ratigan
stated that they would like to return to the City Council on February
19 or February 26 for site plan approval. Mr. Ratigan stated that an
a
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP 1/29/98
Page 2
update of the documents have been submitted to Bill Mignogna's firm
for review. He stated that Mr. Mignogna assessed that the documents
were between 75% and 80% complete. Mr. Ratigan stated that the
project should be issued for bid by the end of March. Mr. Ratigan
stated that the firm had met with City Attorney Bill Hyland to discuss
the construction contract. Mr. Ratigan stated they would like to
present the Council with a contract to award construction for approval
at the beginning of May and after award of the contract, began
construction of the baseball fields the first of June.
In response to a questions by Mayor Russo, Mr. Ratigan stated that
the tennis courts would be lost the end of May and that the baseball
fields should be completed by the end of December. He stated that
barring any unforeseen disasters, the baseball fields should be
completed by the end of December.
In response to a question by Mayor Russo, Mr. Ratigan stated that the
bid would be bid as one contract. He stated that they would consider
asking for separate bid prices for the recreation facility improvements
so that if the bid came in over budget, construction on the recreation
facility would not be delayed.
In response to a question posed by Councilwoman Monroe, Mr.
Ratigan stated that the staging area would house construction trailers,
plumbing and electrical contractor's stock material, construction steel,
as well as other materials.
In response to a question by Councilwoman Monroe, Mr. Ratigan
stated that one of the possible uses for the church would be to house
fire department staff in order to vacate the fire station which would
allow the contractor to go in and complete the fire station without
having to work around existing operations.
City Manager Herakovich stated that staff would continue to look at
alternatives for keeping the existing tennis courts at their current
location longer as long as possible.
William Mignogna, construction manager, stated that if the staging
area were separate from the construction site, it would add dollars to
the budget.
Vice Mayor Furtado expressed her dissatisfaction with staff for not
planning ahead for the relocation of the tennis programs and other
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP 1/29/98 Page 3
services that may have to be dislocated during the construction. She
stated that the City of Palm Beach Gardens is a recreation oriented
community and that these issues should have been addressed earlier
in the planning process. Vice Mayor Furtado stated that she does not
want to see any more mayor issues arise that have not been planned
for and that we should not make commitments to residents that can
not be kept.
City Manager Herakovich stated that monthly updates of the
municipal complex would be included in the monthly report to the
Council. Ms. Herakovich also stated that until the geometry of the
site was established, the boundaries of the site were not known. She
stated that staff and the architects had gone through a survey process
and prepared a legal description of the site. Ms. Herakovich stated
that until overlays were prepared, there was no way of knowing how
things would fit on the site.
Kevin Ratigan stated that different scenarios would be looked at as the
project evolved and that construction of the municipal complex was
a complicated project.
Mayor Russo stated that the Council would like staff to provide an
update on the project at each Council meeting.
City Manager Herakovich stated that once the phasing project had
been determined that staff would add the monthly update of the
municipal complex as an item on the agenda.
Dale Caippetti presented the Council with a diagram and description
of the proposed Council assembly room and also provided an update
on the Council assembly functional plan including the arrival /gathering
entry, assembly entrance, Council dais, audio /visual control, presenter
options, assembly and large video display.
RECESS: The City Council recessed the Council Workshop at 7:45 p.m.
RECONVENE: The City Council reconvened the Council Workshop at 8:57 p.m.
Kevin Ratigan stated that at the last meeting with the Council they had
presented some advantages and disadvantages with the clay tile roof,
S- shaped metal roof and concrete roof. He stated that ADG had
proceeded with the construction documents detailing the roof around
the clay tile roof.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP 1/29/98 Page 4
In response to a question by Councilman Clark, Mr. Ratigan stated
that he believed that the budget would allow for the clay tile and
recommended that the Council bid the s- shaped metal roof as an
alternate.
After much discussion regarding the different types of roof tiles, it was
the consensus of the City Council to bid. the clay tile in the base bid
and to bid the s- shaped metal roof as an alternate.
MINORITY BUSINESS Paul Friedman, Management Administrator, stated that the
Construction Manager, legal staff and MCAT discussed the minority
bidding process of the project and recommends that there be an
excerpt within the RFP that would state "the encouragement for all
general contractors to utilize certified and registered minority women
and black businesses for the construction of this project."
CONSTRUCTION
MANAGER Bill Mignogna stated that they his firm was in the process of reviewing
the drawings and specification of the RFP.
ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned
at 10:15 p.m.
APPROVAL:
MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO
VICE MAYOR LAUREN W. FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN LINDA MONROE
COUNCILMAN ERIC JABLIN
COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK
ATTEST:
CINDY HARVEY, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
CITY COUNCIL
JOINT MEETING WITH
THE CITY COUNCIL OF RIVIERA BEACH
JANUARY 29, 1998
The January 29, 1998, Joint Meeting with the City Council of the City
of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and the City Council of the City of
Riviera Beach, Florida, was called to order at 7:45 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex located at 10500 North
Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida; and opened with the
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL: The following elected officials were found to be in attendance. for the
City of Palm Beach Gardens: Mayor Joseph R. Russo, Vice Mayor
Lauren W. Furtado, Councilwoman Linda Monroe, Councilman Eric
Jablin and Councilman David Clark.
The following elected officials were found to be attendance for the
City of Riviera Beach: Mayor Williams, Councilperson Confrey,
Councilperson Hurley, Councilperson Becton, Councilperson Moffitt,
and Councilperson Burrs. Staff in attendance were: City Manager
Hunter, City Attorney DeGraffenreidt, III, and City Clerk Ward.
Mayor Russo welcomed the City Council and staff of Riviera Beach
to the City of Palm Beach Gardens.
Mayor Russo introduced Commissioner Karen Marcus and thanked
her for attending the meeting.
City Manager Herakovich introduced City staff who were in
attendance at the meeting: Police Chief FitzGerald, Assistant City
Manager Greg Dunham, Growth Management Director Roxanne
Manning, Principal Planner Kim Glas, City Attorney David Acton and
Deputy City Clerk Cindy Harvey.
Staff from the City of Riviera Beach introduced themselves: Interim
Fire Chief Troy Perry, Council Liaison Rose Ann Brown, City
Engineer Lyle Smadi, Director of Community Development Steve
Cramer, City Attorney DeGraffenreidt, City Clerk Cari War, and City
Manager William Hunter.
City Manager Herakovich stated that she and City Manager Hunter
had met and discussed issues that were of joint concern to both cities
JOINT MEETING WITH RIVIERA BEACH 1/29/98
Page 2
and also discussed north county as a whole. Ms. Herakovich stated
Palm Beach Garden's City Council wanted to express to Riviera
Beach City Council some issues that arose during that planning
process of the Congress Avenue extension. She stated that
Commissioner Marcus was in attendance tonight to address any
questions about the current progress of the project.
NORTH/SOUTH ROAD City Planner Kim Glas distributed a map of the Northlake reliever.
Ms. Glas stated that there were three different road issues discussed
at the time of the Congress Avenue extension: the CRALLS, Level of
Service F on Northlake Boulevard and the alignment of the Northlake
reliever. Ms. Glas stated the Palm Beach Gardens City Council had
concerns about adopting a lower level of service on Northlake
Boulevard. She stated that the City of Riviera Beach and Town of
Lake Park entered into an interlocal agreement with Palm Beach
County but that Palm Beach Gardens did not. Ms. Glas stated Palm
Beach Gardens does not recognize the lower level of service on
Northlake Boulevard and that the City adopted Level Service D in
their comprehensive plan to use for concurrency purposes. Ms. Glas
stated that Palm Beach. Gardens was still optimistic that something
would occur and the City would not have to adopt Level of Service
F on Northlake Boulevard.
Ms. Glas stated that Palm Beach Gardens supported the southerly
alignment for the Northlake reliever primarily due to safety issues.
Ms. Glas stated the northerly alignment went pass the elementary
school and that was a concern to the City of Palm Beach Gardens.
She stated that the southerly alignment was in Palm Beach Garden's
future annexation area.
Lyle Smadi, Riviera Beach City Engineer, stated that Riviera Beach
does not support the southerly alignment for the following reasons:
located immediately north of Leal Lane, the S curb after I -95 divides
the lands at an odd angle, where it is proposed to intersect at
Congress was very close west of the expansion of a subdivision and
the distance between the two were not sufficient for traffic lights, and
the Leal Lane property owners objected.
Commissioner Karen Marcus stated that the reason that the County
renewed as the original alignment after County staff met the
neighborhood and the church who expressed their concerns.
Commissioner Marcus stated that the County looked at Leal Lane,
and there were a dozen reasons why that route would not work
JOINT MEETING WITH RIVIERA BEACH 1/29/98
Page 3
including being too far south, it crossed I -95, too close to Silver
Beach Road, and the neighbors. Commissioner Marcus stated the
County staff recommended the southerly alignment to the Commission
because it took it out of the neighborhood and would have resolved
the school issue, and also would have been cheaper. Commissioner
Marcus stated that the current route selected by the Commission
would impact the industries financially.
Commissioner Marcus stated that the Notice to Proceed for final
design for the Northlake reliever was December 4, 1997 and
scheduled to be 35% complete by June 1998. She stated that the
alignment does affect Congress Avenue and that if the southerly
alignment was used, Congress Avenue would have to be redesigned.
She stated that the construction of Congress Avenue had already been
delayed because the Town of Lake Park had not designated its
CRALLS designation. Commissioner Marcus stated that the Town of
Lake Park had not decided what they want their western area to look
like, which Congress Avenue maybe a part of, and therefore, may
want the County to postpone final plans until they have planned their
western boundary.
Mayor Russo recommended that Palm Beach Gardens and Riviera
Beach have a joint meeting with their staff, County staff, and FDOT
to determine if all issues surrounding the southerly alignment could be
resolved and revisit the southerly alignment which would work better
for all parties.
IMPACT OF V.A.
HOSPITAL Interim Fire Chief Perry stated that there was no significant impact
from the V.A. Hospital on Riviera Beach services. Ms. Herakovich
stated included in the packet was a memo from Acting Fire Chief
Bergel stating that there was no significant impact from the V.A.
Hospital on Palm Beach Gardens City services.
ADDRESS ISSUES:
POST OFFICE/
OTHER COMMUNITIES City Manager Herakovich stated that the City of Palm Beach Gardens
as well as other North County municipalities were concerned because
municipal boundaries does not match post office boundaries. She
stated that a person might live in Riviera Beach but have a Palm Beach
Gardens address and wanted to know if the City of Riviera Beach was
experiencing the same problem.
JOINT MEETING WITH RIVIERA BEACH 1/29/98
Page 4
Councilperson Becton stated that the City of Riviera Beach had
experienced the same problem and that they have found that it affects
the number of dollars received from the State.
Commissioner Marcus stated that both Riviera Beach and Palm Beach
Gardens should call their individual congressmen as a group to seek
assistance to address the problem.
Mayor Russo stated that the issue should be brought to the Municipal
League's attention to see if they could assistance also.
OTHER BUSINESS Councilperson Becton stated that they have been having monthly
collaborations with the School District and some members of Police
Departments to come up with a collaborative plan of activities for
school children. Ms. Becton stated that children do not recognize
municipal boundaries and that there was a need to provide activities
for youth in the north area to participate in when they were not in
school.
Vice Mayor Furtado stated the City of Palm Beach Gardens had
started a PAL'S program which children from all of North County
participate in.
Councilman Jablin stated that the Education Advisory Board would
like to have a joint meeting with Riviera Beach's Education Advisory
Board to discuss the school situation. He stated that from there
maybe they could put together a North County summit for all the
parties that are concerned with school issues.
Mayor Russo stated that Palm Beach Gardens would like to continue
to have joint meetings with the Riviera Beach and recommended
having a meeting in approximately nine months at the City of Riviera
Beach to continue discussing issues of concern to both cities.
Councilperson Burrs inquired about the specifics of the Palm Beach
Gardens PAL's program. City Manager Herakovich stated that she
would have Police Chief FitzGerald contact Councilperson Burrs to
discuss the program.
ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned
at 8:51 p.m.
JOINT MEETING WITH RIVIERA BEACH 1/29/98
APPROVAL:
MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO
VICE MAYOR LAUREN W. FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN LINDA MONROE
COUNCILMAN ERIC JABLIN
COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK
ATTEST:
CINDY HARVEY, DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Page 5
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
FEBRUARY 5, 1998
The February 5, 1998, meeting of the City of Palm Beach Gardens Local
Planning Agency was called to order at 7:34 P.M. in the Council
Chambers of the Municipal Complex located at 10500 North Military
Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida; and opened with the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL The roll was called by the City Clerk and the following members were
found to be in attendance: Mayor Joseph R. Russo, Vice Mayor Lauren
Furtado, Councilwoman Linda Monroe, Councilman Eric Jablin and
Councilman David Clark.
Soverel North
Land Use
Amendment Kim Glas, Principal Planner, briefed the Local Planning Agency regarding
a petition known as " Soverel North" amendment to the Comprehensive
Land Use Plan. Ms. Glas stated that staff recommended approval of the
petition based on Comprehensive Plan criteria and because the proposed
land use was less intense then the current zoned land use would allow.
Ms. Glas pointed out that Palm Beach County objected to specific site
issues
Ms. Glas stated that, as part of the record for File #LU9702, there was a
petition from Idlewild Road residents, the County objection and letters of
objections from individual residents. However, Ms. Glas stated that staff
was recommending approval without any new text additions. Ms. Glas
stated that one of the main concerns regarding this petition was the heavy
traffic on Idlewild Road from the industrial area, and pointed out that if the
project's sole access was on Idlewild Road, concurrency would not be met.
Councilwoman Monroe stated that she always had a problem providing a
land use designation without making sure capacity was available on
roadways. Ms. Glas pointed out that today's land use would not be
supported by the 2015 Plan.
It was the consensus of the Local Planning Agency that the land should be
annexed into the City and the site plan should be reviewed by the City to
allow the City would have more control over this area.
Hank Skokowski of Urban Design Studios asked that the Local Planning
Agency consider approval of the petition based on the land use issues
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY, 2/5/98 2
alone and pointed out that the City Council would have the opportunity to
approve a site plan once the land was annexed.
Mayor Russo declared the public hearing open, which was duly advertised
1/29/98. The following residents addressed the Local Planning Agency
with their concerns: City Attorney Acton advised the City Council that the
procedure being followed was legal.
Betty Britch, 2339 Idlewild Road, was opposed to the density of the
proposed project.
Patricia Kaeding, 2381 Idlewild Road, was opposed to the project as she
felt it was not in the best interest of the residents and opposed direct access
on Idlewild Road.
Michael Martino, 320 Balsam Street, opposed the procedure used by the
City for this petition, feeling that an amendment to the City's
Comprehensive Plan should not be done on property not yet annexed by
the City.
The following residents addressed the Local Planning Agency in favor of
the petition:
Ray Flack, LaPorte Drive, stated he owned a marina slip at Soverel
Harbour and was in favor of the project.
Lee Erickson, 2312 Idlewild Road, stated he was not opposed to the
project, however, pointed out various drainage problems in the area in
hopes that the project would not worsen those problems.
There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Russo declared
the public hearing closed.
A motion was made by Councilman Clark, seconded by Vice Mayor
Furtado, to recommend approval of submittal to the Florida Department of
Community Affairs for the Soverel North Land Use Change from Palm
Beach County Low Residential 3 (LR3) and Palm Beach Gardens
Commercial (C ) to Residential Medium (RM) on 1.52 Acres and
Residential High (RH) on 5.74 Acres. The motion was carried by a vote
of 3 ayes and 2 nays, with Mayor Russo and Councilwoman Monroe
casting the nay votes.
ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at
8:17 P.M.
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY, 2/5/98
APPROVAL
MAYOR JOSEPH R.RUSSO
VICE MAYOR LAUREN FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN LINDA MONROE
COUNCILMAN ERIC JABLIN
COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK
ATTEST:
LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK
3
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 5, 1998
The February 5, 1998, Regular Meeting of the City Council of the
City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, was called to order at 8:17
P.M., subsequent to the adjournment of the February 5, 1998,
meeting of the Local Planning Agency, in the Council Chambers of
the Municipal Complex located at 10500 North Military Trail,
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida; and opened with the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
ROLL CALL The roll was called by the City Clerk, and the following elected
officials were found to be in attendance: Mayor Joseph R. Russo,
Vice Mayor Lauren Furtado, Councilwoman Linda Monroe,
Councilman Eric Jablin and Councilman David Clark.
PRESENTATIONS
Employee of the Year City Manager Bobbie Herakovich made a presentation of the City's
First Annual 1997 Employee of the Year Award to Marguerite
Wederath of the Human Resources Department.
Neighborhood Initiative
Task Force
Dr. Richard Ormond, Chairman of the Neighborhood Initiative
Task Force, made a presentation to the City Council on the
progress and activities of the Task Force and asked that the City
Council consider an extension of that body to allow specific tasks
to be accomplished. Dr. Ormond felt that the City should start
small with the program "Neighbors Helping Neighbors" and also
asked that the City Council consider funding a full -time position in
the next fiscal year such as "Neighborhood Services Coordinator ".
Dr. Ormond asked that the City organize a City wide
Neighborhood Conference.
Mayor Russo suggested that half of the collected Code
Enforcement fines be used to fund improvements for the Neighbors
Helping Neighbors program.
CITY MANAGER REPORT City Manager Herakovich updated the City Council on the progress
of obtaining land for a future tennis facility, stating that the City
Council would consider acceptance of a Letter of Agreement with
the John D. And Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation later on the
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, 2/5/98 2
agenda for the purpose of purchasing land for the facility. City
Manager Herakovich stated that 2 appraisals would be in by the
end of the month on this property. City Manager Herakovich
reported that the Tennis Action Group would meet again next
week.
City Manager Herakovich reported that Bill Mignogna had been
given the task of finding a site to locate construction trailers for the
new municipal complex and a preliminary vegetation assessment
was currently underway.
City Manager Herakovich stated that an ad for the position of Fire
Chief had been placed nationally, and the firm hired to screen all
applications had received 57 applications to date. The closing date
for acceptance of applications is February 6, 1998.
City Manager Herakovich stated she would be meeting next week
with the City Attorney regarding C.B. radio problems; announced
that the speed trailer would be delivered on February 6, 1998, and
it would be located in the older section of the City first in hopes of
reducing speeding problems in that area.
AWARDING OF BIDS
Landscape Services Councilman Clark made a motion, seconded by Councilman Jablin
to approve the staff recommendation for Landscape Services, to 4
firms, as follows: 1) Urban Resource Group of Vero Beach; 2)
Post, Buckley, Schuh & Jernigan of West Palm Beach; (3) Roy -
Fisher Associates of Tequesta; and (4) Bermello - Ajamil & Partners
of Ft. Lauderdale. The motion was unanimously carried.
Fleet Maintenance Software Councilwoman Monroe made a motion to approve the awarding of
a bid for Fleet Maintenance Software Programs to D P Solutions,
Inc. In the amount of $14,950. The motion was seconded by Vice
Mayor Furtado and unanimously carried.
ITEMS BY MAYOR
AND CITY COUNCIL
Vice Mayor Furtado Vice Mayor Furtado suggested that the City consider advertising
for police officers outside the State of Florida to attract some
quality officers.
Councilwoman Monroe Councilwoman Monroe thanked the Public Works Department for
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, 2/5/98
landscaping work done at I -95 and Northlake Boulevard.
Councilman Clark Councilman Clark reported on a quarterly meeting of the
Intergovernmental Coordination Program that he attended on
Monday, and a meeting on Wednesday of the Beautification and
Environmental Committee.
Mayor Russo Mayor Russo reported he attended a meeting on Monday of
Eastward Ho and attended a meeting of the Tennis Action
Committee.
CONSENT AGENDA Councilwoman Monroe requested that Item 2 on the Consent
Agenda be pulled for amendments.
Councilman Clark made a motion to approve Items 1 and 3 on the
Consent Agenda. Councilman Jablin seconded the motion, which
was unanimously carried. The following items were approved on
the Consent Agenda:
1. Approval of 1/22/98 City Council Special Meeting Minutes
2. Resolution 11, 1998, Approval to provide support of the Palm
Beach County Hazardous Materials Ordinance.
Councilwoman Monroe made a motion to approve the Minutes of
the 1/22/98 City Council Regular Meeting with an amendment to
page 4 as follows: last paragraph, second line, after "Committee"
add "and secured a position on the task force for the City of Palm
Beach Gardens. The task force is.... ". The motion was seconded
by Councilman Clark and unanimously carried.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Soverel North CLUP Councilman Clark made a motion, seconded by Vice Mayor
Furtado, to approve the submittal of a petition for land use
amendment for Soveral North to the Florida Department of
Community Affairs. The motion was carried by a vote of 3 ayes
and 2 nayes, with Mayor Russo and Councilwoman Monroe
casting the nay vote.
RESOLUTIONS:
Resolution 2, 1998
3
Roxanne Manning, Growth Management Director, reviewed the
Petition for Site Plan Approval for NorthMil Plaza. Ms. Manning
stated that the petitioner had agreed to 17 of 18 conditions for this
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING; 2/5/98 4
project, objecting to the parking calculations being done for
restaurant usage. Attorney Larry Smith; representing the petitioner,
introduced experts for the petitioner and offered 63 exhibits into
the record. Attorney Smith also offered a 64th exhibit, the color
rendering of the project. Attorney Smith stated that the petitioner
requested that the parking calculations be based on requirements
for a shopping center and not include calculations for restaurant
usage. Hank Skokowski, representing the petitioner, reviewed the
project, including landscaping, traffic circulation and elevations.
The following residents expressed their opposition to the proposed
project because of traffic concerns, safety and drainage:
Mike Martino, 320 Balsam Street
Betty Petnl7.7i, 4383 Bamboo Street
Carolyn Savarese, 9135 Bamboo Drive
Ray Celedinas, 4289 Northlake Boulevard, stated that he was in
favor of the project; however, he was concerned with traffic and
circulation problems.
Attorney Larry Smith offered into the record Exhibit #65, a memo
from Lanette Lanning to Richard Walton, and Exhibit #66, a letter
from Kayhart Pinder to Lanette Lanning.
After a suggestion by Vice Mayor Furtado, Attorney Smith stated
that his client was willing to hire a crossing guard during afternoon
school hours for the safety of children crossing the ingress /egress.
The Council expressed concern with the ingress /egress on Military
Trail, and the height of the proposed sign. The Council felt that the
height of the sign would inhibit view for children on bicycles from
incoming traffic. Councilwoman Monroe did not feel the
petitioner offered,RY66-h creativity on rear elevations.
54�t
It was the consensus of the City Council to bring Resolution 2,
1998, back at the next Regular Meeting of the City Council for
further consideration as there were a number of issues yet to be
resolved and not enough time to discuss some of the Council's
concerns. Attorney Smith objected to the City Council not voting
at this meeting.
Resolution 3, 1998 Councilwoman Monroe made a motion, seconded by Councilman
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, 2/5/98
Clark, to approve Resolution 3, 1998, extending the Neighborhood
Initiative Task Force for six months, ending August 5, 1998. The
motion was unanimously carried.
Resolution 10, 1998 Councilman Clark made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman
Monroe, to reappoint the following members to the Planning and
Zoning Commission: Joel Channing, Diane M. Carlino, Thomas E.
Pastore and John Glidden. The motion was unanimously carried.
ORDINANCES
Ordinance 48, 1997 Councilman Clark made a motion to place Ordinance 48, 1997,
annexing into the City certain lands known as Soverel North, on
first reading, by title only. The motion was seconded by Vice
Mayor Furtado and unanimously carried. Councilwoman Monroe
made a motion to reconsider Ordinance 48, 1997, seconded by
Councilman Clark and unanimously carried. Councilman Clark
made a motion to place Ordinance 48, 1997, on first reading, by
title only. The motion was seconded by Councilman Jablin and
carried by a vote of 3 ayes and 2 nayes, with Councilwoman
Monroe and Mayor Russo casting the nay votes. The City Clerk
read Ordinance 48, 1997, on first reading, by title only.
Ordinance 49, 1997 Councilman Clark made a motion to place Ordinance 49, 1997,
amending the Comprehensive Land Use Plan for Soverel North
annexation, on first reading, by title only. The motion was
seconded by Councilman Jablin and carried by a vote of 3 ayes and
2 nays, with Councilwoman Monroe and Mayor Russo casting the
nay votes. The City Clerk read Ordinance 49, 1997, on first
reading, by title only.
ITEMS FOR COUNCIL
ACTION
Letter of Agreement Councilman Clark made a motion, seconded by Vice Mayor
Furtado, to accept the Letter of Agreement between the City and
the John D. And Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation for the
purchase of property for the use of a tennis facility. The motion
unanimously carried.
ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was
adjourned at 11:20 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING, 2/5/98
APPROVAL:
MAYOR JOSEPH R.RUSSO
VICE MAYOR LAUREN FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN LINDA MONROE
COUNCILMAN ERIC JABLIN
COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK
F410W16
LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK
6
February 13, 1998
RESOLUTION 12, 1998
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR AN
EXPRESSION OF ITS VIGOROUS OPPOSITION TO FLORIDA
HOUSE BILL 3291, THE "TELECOMMUNICATIONS RIGHT -
OF -WAY ACT ", OR ANY SIMILAR LEGISLATION WHICH
WOULD HAVE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT UPON
LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S AUTHORITY OVER ITS PUBLIC
RIGHTS -OF -WAY AND THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS
PROVIDERS WHO MAY WISH TO UTILIZE SAME;
PROVIDING FOR DISTRIBUTION; AND PROVIDING AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens has been informed with
regard to proposed House Bill 3291 which is also known as the "Telecommunications Right -of-
Way Act",
WHEREAS, this proposed legislation has significant adverse impacts with regard to a local
government's authority over its public rights -of -way as well as its authority over the
telecommunications providers who may wish to utilize same,
WHEREAS, this proposed legislation will severely diminish revenues now provided
through franchise fees levied for the use of these rights -of -way and will infringe on local
governments' home rule powers, and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens believes this proposed
legislation represents an unfunded mandate which, together with the reduction of money now
collected through franchise fees, would create a shortfall in revenues generally collected and
potentially result in property tax increases to residents in order to recover such lost revenues.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens vigorously opposes House
Bill 3291 ( "Telecommunications Right -of -Way Act ") or any other similar legislation which would
have the effect of eliminating a local government's ability to control utilization of rights -of -way
located within its jurisdiction as well as limiting the type and amount of compensation a local
government can charge for the use of this limited resource.
Resolution 12, 1998
Page 2
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to distribute this Resolution
to the Palm Beach County Municipal League, Inc., the Palm Beach County Legislative
Delegation, and the Florida League of Cities.
Section 3. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption.
INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF FEBRUARY 1998.
ATTEST:
LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK
VOTE:
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN MONROE
COUNCILMAN JABLIN
COUNCILMAN CLARK
JOSEPH RUSSO, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
AND SUFFICIENCY
CITY ATTORNEY
AYE NAY ABSENT
FROM: P.B.County Municipal League PHONE NO.: (561 ) 355 -4484 Jan 29, 1998 11:16 AM P2/3
RESOLUTION NO. 98 -1
A RESOLUTION OF THE PALM BEACH COUNTY MUNICIPAL LEAGUE,
INC, EXPRESSING ITS VIGOROUS OPPOSITION TO HOUSE BILL 3291
WHICH IS SOMETBAES CITED AS THE "TELECOMMUNICATIONS RIGHTS -
OF -WAY ACT" OR ANY SIMILAR LEGISLATION SINCE SUCH ACT OR
LEGISLATION WOULD HAVE SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS WITH
REGARD TO A LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S AUTHORITY OVER ITS PUBLIC
RIGHTS -OF -WAY AS WELL AS ITS AUTHORITY OVER THE
TELECOMMUNICATIONS PROVIDERS WHO MAY WISH TO UTILIZE
SAME, PROVIDING FOR DISTRIBUTION OF THIS RESOLUTION;
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
WHEREAS, the Palm Beach County Municipal League, Inc. has been fully informed with
regard to proposed House Bill 3291 which is also known as the "Telecomm»n +_cations Rights -of-
Way Act"; and
WHEREAS, both the Board of Directors and the General Membership of the Palm Beach-
County Municipal League, Inc. which includes all thirty -eight (38) municipalities within Patrn Beach
County have been fully informed with regard to this legislation; and
WHEREAS, this proposed legislation has significant adverse impacts with regard to a local
government's authority over its public rights -of -way as well as its authority over the
telecommunications providers who may wish to utilize same; and
WHEREAS, this proposed legislation will severely diminish revenues now provided through
franchise fees levied for the use of these rights -of -way and will infringe on local govemments' home
rule powers; and
WHEREAS, the Palm Beach County Municipal League, Inc. believes this proposed
legislation represents an unfunded mandate, as well since the reduction of money now collected
through franchise fees would create a shortfall in revenues generally collected thus, potentially
resulting in property tax increases to residents in order to recover such lost revenues.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, INC. THAT:
Section 1: The Board of Directors and the General Membership of the Palm Beach
FROM: P.B.County Municipal League PHONE NO.: (561) 355 -4484 Jan 29, 1998 11:16 AM P 3/3
County Municipal League, Inc. which includes all thirty-eight (38) municipalities located within
Palm Beach County vigorously OPPOSE House Bill 3291 known as the "Telecommunications
Right -of -Way Act" or any other similar legislation which would have the effect of eliminating a
local government's ability to control utilization of rights -of -way located within its jurisdiction as
well as limiting the type and amount of compensation a local government can charge for the use of
this limited resource.
Section : This Resolution shall be submitted to the Palm Beach County Legislative
Delegation and to the Florida League of Cities.
Section 3: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of _ , 1998.
Attest:
Gale M. English, Secretary/ Treasurer
FAdocs\Municipal League\reso1u17.wpd
-2-
PALM BEACH COUNTY MUNICIPAL
LEAGUE, INC.
Ron T. Mackail, President
(Seal)
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
10SOO N. MILITARY TRAIL • PALM BEACH GARDENS. FLORIDA 334144698
INTER OFFICE MEMO
Date: January 27, 1998
To: Bobbie Herakovich, City Manager
From: Peter T. Bergel, Acting Fire Ch'
RE: Draft Resolution for South Tech Fire Academy
Recently the Superintendent of Palm Beach County Schools announced that they intend
to divest Palm Beach County Schools from the responsibility for post- secondary
education and vocational training programs by transitioning� these programs to Palm
Beach Community College. However, there has never been a written plan developed by
either agency detailing how, when, or under what circumstances the transition will take
place.
As you are aware the fire department has contracted South Tech for all our training and
testing needs. This transition as we know it today will jeopardize what we have worked
on for two years to develop. I have enclosed a draft resolution from the Fire Chiefs
Association of Palm Beach County that addresses the lack of planning and our
opportunity to review and comment on this transition. I am requesting that this draft
resolution be reviewed by counsel and scheduled for the next available Council Agenda
so that it may be passed and forwarded to the Superintendent of Palm Beach County
Schools. Should you have any questions or comments concerning this matter, please do
not hesitate to contact me.
cc: file
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Date: January 27, 1998
Resolution for Fire Academy at South Technical Center
Subject/Agenda Item
Recommendation /Motion:
Reviewed by:
Originating Dept:
Costs: $--2—
Council Action:
Total
City Attorney
FIRE
[ ] Approved
Finance
3
(] Approved w
Current FY
ACM
[ ] Denied
Advertised:
Human Res.
Funding Source:
[ ] Continued to:
Attachments:
Other
Date:
[ ] Operating
Paper.
[ ]Other
i
Draft Resolution
Submitted by:
(x ] Not Required
Memo to CM
Peter Bergel
Department Director
Affected parties
[ ] Notified
Budget Acct #::
[ ] None
Approved by:
City Manager
[ ] Not required
BACKGROUND:
Resolution to Palm Beach County District Schools concerning transition of
of Fire Academy to Palm Beach Community College.
February 19, 1998
RESOLUTION 15, 1998
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, REQUESTING THAT
THE PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD WITHHOLD
THE DECISION TO DIVEST THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR
\EFFECTIVE NDARY EDUCATION AND VOCATIONAL
PROGRAMS TO THE PALM BEACH
TY COLLEGE UNTIL A WRITTEN PLAN HAS
VELOPED AND DISTRIBUTED TO ALL
ITIES AND POLITICAL JURISDICTIONS WITHIN
COUNTY FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT;
R DISTRIBUTION; AN DING FOR AN
DA E.
WHEREAS, the Palm Beac Gardens
comprehensive fir e suppression, fire reven
hazardous materials' incident response an
City of Palm Beach Gardens,
WHEREAS, the efficient
practical simulation,
WHEREAS, the Fire
Boynton Beach, is the only f,
WHEREAS, the log
State of Florida for Fire F
'Department is involved in the delivery of
pre - hospital emergency medical services,
i, and other emergency functions within the
1
cy services requires specialized training and
,my, on the campu�of South Technical Training Center in
equipped for this training in Palm Beach County,
Academy facilities also me&,tthe extensive requirements of the
recruit training and certification,,
WHEREAS, the ity of Palm Beach Gardens, through its Fire Department, also uses these
facilities and service extensively for training and education of incumbent Fire Fighters,
Paramedics, Hazardous'Materials and Technicians, and Line Officers,
WHEREAS, the City of Palm Beach Gardens also uses the services and instructional
capability of the Fire Academy for other training programs required in fire and police services
dealing with confined space entry and safety, blood borne pathogen training, self contained
breathing apparatus training, and fire respondent hazardous materials training,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach is very interested in the creation
of vocational magnets and supports the Palm Beach County School Districts efforts to make room
for such a program.
WHEREAS, the Superintendent of the Palm Beach County School District has recently
announced an intention to divest Palm Beach County District Schools from the responsibility for
post- secondary education and vocational training programs, by transitioning these programs to
Palm Beach Community College, and
Resolution 15, 1998
Page 2
WHEREAS, no written plan has yet been developed by either the Palm Beach County
School District or Palm Beach Community College detailing how, when, or under what
circumstances the transition of these programs will occur; or what will become of the current
facilities, simulators, equipment and programs which now are available at the local Fire Academy.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens correspond request that
the School Board of Palm Beach County withhold action on its plan to transition responsibility for
the Fire Academy until a detailed, written plan has been developed and distributed to every
municipality and political jurisdiction within Palm Beach County for review and comment; that
the School Board take no action on the Superintendent's proposal with reference to the Fire
Academy, its programs, and services until a review has been completed by the Fire Academy
Advisory Board, the Fire Chiefs Association of Palm Beach County, and the City Managers
Association of Palm Beach County; and that the School Board schedule a public hearing on any
proposed transition plan so that input may be officially received from municipalities, other
political subdivisions, constituent groups, and the general public.
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to distribute this resolution
shall be submitted to the Superintendent of the Palm Beach County School Board, Palm Beach
County Municipalities, Fire Academy Advisory Board, and the Fire Chiefs Association of Palm
Beach County.
Section 3. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF FEBRUARY 1998.
JOSEPH RUSSO, MAYOR
Resolution 15, 1998
Page 3
ATTEST:
LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK
VOTE:
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN MONROE
COUNCILMAN JABLIN
COUNCILMAN CLARK
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
AND SUFFICIENCY
CITY ATTORNEY
AYE NAY ABSENT
February 13, 1998
RESOLUTION 15, 1998
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, REQUESTING THAT
THE PALM BEACH COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD WITHHOLD
THE DECISION TO DIVEST THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR
POST - SECONDARY EDUCATION AND VOCATIONAL
TRAINING PROGRAMS TO THE PALM BEACH
COMMUNITY COLLEGE UNTIL A WRITTEN PLAN HAS
BEEN DEVELOPED AND DISTRIBUTED TO ALL
MUNICIPALITIES AND POLITICAL JURISDICTIONS WITHIN
PALM BEACH COUNTY FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT;
PROVIDING FOR DISTRIBUTION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Palm Beach Gardens Fire Department is involved in the delivery of
comprehensive fire suppression, fire prevention, pre - hospital emergency medical services,
hazardous materials' incident response and mitigation, and other emergency functions within the
City of Palm Beach Gardens,
WHEREAS, the efficient delivery of emergency services requires specialized training and
practical simulation,
WHEREAS, the Fire Academy, on the campus of South Technical Training Center in
Boynton Beach, is the only facility equipped for this training in Palm Beach County,
WHEREAS, the local Fire Academy facilities also meet the extensive requirements of the
State of Florida for Fire Fighter recruit training and certification,
WHEREAS, the City of Palm Beach Gardens, through its Fire Department, also uses these
facilities and services extensively for training and education of incumbent Fire Fighters,
Paramedics, Hazardous Materials and Technicians, and Line Officers,
WHEREAS, the City of Palm Beach Gardens also uses the services and instructional
capability of the Fire Academy for other training programs required in fire and police services
dealing with confined space entry and safety, blood borne pathogen training, self contained
breathing apparatus training, and fire respondent hazardous materials training,
WHEREAS, the Superintendent of the Palm Beach County School District has recently
announced an intention to divest Palm Beach County District Schools from the responsibility for
post - secondary education and vocational training programs, by transitioning these programs to
Palm Beach Community College, and
WHEREAS, no. written plan has ,yet been developed by either the Palm Beach County
School District or Palm Beach Community College detailing how, when, or under what
circumstances the transition of these programs will occur; or what- will become of the current
facilities, simulators, equipment and programs which now are available at the local Fire Academy.
Resolution 15, 1998
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: .
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens correspond request that
the School Board of Palm Beach County withhold action on its plan to transition responsibility for
the Fire Academy until a detailed, written plan has been developed and distributed to every
municipality and political jurisdiction within Palm Beach County for review and comment; that
the. School Board take no action on the Superintendent's proposal with reference to the Fire
Academy, its programs, and services until a review has been completed by the Fire Academy
Advisory Board, the Fire Chiefs Association of Palm Beach County, and the City Managers
Association of Palm Beach County; and that the School Board schedule a public hearing on any
proposed transition plan so that input may be officially received from municipalities, other
political subdivisions, constituent groups, and the general public.
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to distribute this resolution
shall be submitted to the Superintendent of the Palm Beach County School Board, Palm Beach
County Municipalities, Fire Academy Advisory Board, and the Fire Chiefs Association of Palm
Beach County.
Section 3. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF FEBRUARY 1998.
JOSEPH RUSSO, MAYOR
Resolution 15, 1998
Page 3
ATTEST:
LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK
MA
VOTE:
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN MONROE
COUNCILMAN JABLIN
COUNCILMAN CLARK
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
AND SUFFICIENCY
CITY ATTORNEY
AYE NAY ABSENT
February 13, 1998
RESOLUTION 18, 1998
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR
SUPPORT OF PERMANENT AND CONSISTENT FUNDING FOR
REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCILS; AND, PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens strongly supports
continuation and full funding of regional planning councils in the State of Florida,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens recognizes the value added
to the regional and local planning process through the work of regional planning councils,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens recognizes that regional
planning councils are required to perform numerous growth management, local technical assistance,
and interlocal dispute resolution functions, as well as other important statutory duties in support of
local initiatives,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens believes that failure to fund
regional planning councils fully and consistently will adversely impact the quality of future growth,
development, and interlocal relationships in South Florida, and
WHEREAS, having to compete for funding annually out of dwindling revenue sources is not
an efficient allocation of public resources and dedication of staff time and energy to support renewal
of annual funding, and reduces the amount of time dedicated by regional planning councils to support
local initiatives.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens hereby requests that the
Florida Legislature support the Governor's budget recommendation for regional planning councils
recurring and appropriate recurring funding for regional planning councils as a $2.7 million line item
in the Department of Community Affairs base budget.
Section 2. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens hereby authorizes and directs
the City Clerk to distribute copies of this resolution to Governor Lawton Chiles; the Martin, Palm
Beach, St. Lucie, and Indian River County Legislative Delegations; the Treasure Coast Regional
Council; and all Palm Beach County municipalities.
RESOLUTION 18, 1998
Page 2
Section 3. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF FEBRUARY 1998.
ATTEST:
LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK
Im
VOTE:
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN MONROE
COUNCILMAN JABLIN
COUNCILMAN CLARK
JOSEPH R. RUSSO, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
AND SUFFICIENCY
CITY ATTORNEY
AYE NAY ABSENT
.._ _...._ _... _ . .
recvure
COCIA
1 regional
planning
council _
FEB 51998
MEMORANDUM
To: Council Members, Alternates, and Treasure Coast Region Local Governments
From: Michael J. Busha, Executive Director
Date: January 23, 1998
Subject: Resolution in Support of Funding for Regional Planning Councils
At its January 16, 1998 meeting, Council requested that its local governments adopt a
resolution in support of State ftmding for your regional planning council. Attached is a
model resolution for your review and consideration. If you would like to carry this
forward to your respective board please feel free to contact me for any information and
assistance you may need.
Thank you.
Attachment
3228 s.w. martin downs blvd.
suite 205 • p.o. bolt 1529
palm city, Honda 34990
phone (561) 221 -4060
so 2694060 fax (561) 2214067
RESOLUTION .
A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMISSION /COUNCIL OF
OF COUNTY, FLORIDA,
SUPPORTING PERMANENT AND CONSISTENT FUNDING
FOR REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCILS
WHEREAS, the Commission/Council of ,
strongly supports continuation and full funding of Regional Planning Councils in the
State of Florida; and
WHEREAS, the Commission/Council of
recognizes the value added to the through the work of regional
planning councils; and
WHEREAS, the Commission/Council of
recognizes that regional planning councils are required to perform numerous growth
management, local technical assistance, interlocal dispute resolution functions, and other
important statutory duties in support of local initiatives; and
WHEREAS, the Commission/Council .of
believes that not funding regional planning councils fully and consistently will adversely
impact the quality of future growth, development, and interlocal relationships, in South
Florida as a whole, and
WHEREAS, having to compete for funding annually out of dwindling revenue
sources is not an efficient allocation of public resources and dedication of staff time and
energy to support renewal of annual funding, and reduces the amount of time dedicated
by regional planning councils to support local initiatives.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE
COMMISSION /COUNCIL OF OF
COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section 1: The Commission/Council of
hereby requests that the Legislature support the Governor's budget recommendation for
regional planning councils recurring and appropriate recurring funding for regional
planning councils as a $2.7 million line item in the Department of Community Affairs
base budget.
Section 2: The Commission/Council of
Secretary is directed to distribute copies of this resolution to the Honorable Governor
Lawton Chiles; the Martin, Palm Beach, St. Lucie, and Indian River County Legislative
Delegations; the Treasure Coast Regional Council; all County
municipalities; and members of the Commission/Council of
Section 3: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon adoption by the
Commission/Council of
ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 1998.
ATTEST:
WR
Chairman
Transmittal Public Hearing
EAR -Based Amendments
(See packet under Ordinance 4, 1998)
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Date: February 19. 1998
Subject/Agenda Item:
Developer's Agreement -"The Commons"
Recommendation /Motion:
Staff recommends approval of the agreement which allows PUD processing concurrently
with land use change.
Reviewed by: I Originating Dept: Costs: $ 0 Council Action:
City Attorney
ACM
Other N/A
Submitted by:
eivvvu, �riyi. unc�;.vt
Approved by:
City Manager
BACKGROUND:
Planning Division
Advertised:
Date:
Paper:
[ x ] Not Required
- Affected parties
[ ] Notified
[ x ] Not required
Total
$ Q
Current FY
Funding Source:
[ ] Operating
[ ] Other N/A
Budget Acct #:
[ ] Approved
[ ] Approved Wi condki«u
[ ] Denied
[ ] Continued to:
Attachments:
Resolution 19, 1998
'The Commons'
Developer Agreement
[ ] None
This is a request to process PUD petitions simultaneously with small -scale land use
amendments. (These are actually three separate petitions.) Typically, staff reviews
comprehensive plan amendments on the merits of the land use itself, without wanting to
see specific site plans. In this case, because Mixed Use Development (MXD) land use
is being requested, staff feels that the site plans help justify the requested land use
designations. By concurrently processing the PUD petitions, it can be se,
een how the
mix of uses will be integrated, not only within the project itself, but with the surrounding
existing neighborhoods.
In order to process concurrent PUD petitions, Resolution 148, 1996 requires that a
developer's agreement be approved between the City and petitioner.
February 17, 1998
RESOLUTION 19, 1998
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH
GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND CHANNING CORPORATION XXX
CONCERNING LANDS OWNED BY THE MACARTHUR FOUNDATION ALONG
PGA BOULEVARD AT AVENUE OF THE PGA AND HICKORY DRIVE, KNOWN
AS "THE COMMONS" PARCELS 1, 2 AND 3; PROVIDING AUTHORIZATION FOR
THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SUCH AGREEMENT; AND
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Resolution 148, 1996 prevents the Growth Management Department from
receiving or reviewing concurrent petitions for development approval unless the City Council
approves same through a Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City has received a request from Channing Corporation XXX for
concurrent processing of PUD petitions together with Comprehensive Land Use Plan change
petitions filed December 1, 1997; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that concurrent review of PUD petitions
will result in more comprehensively planned projects.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The Development Agreement between the City of Palm Beach Gardens and
Channing Corporation XXX concerning lands owned by the MacArthur Foundation along PGA
Boulevard at Avenue of the PGA and Hickory Drive, known as "The Commons" Parcels 1, 2 and
3, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A ", is hereby approved.
Section 2. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized.and directed to execute said
Development Agreement on behalf of the City of Palm Beach Gardens.
Section 3. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF
ATTEST:
LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK
MAYOR
, 1998
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
BY:
CITY ATTORNEY
Resolution 19, 1998
Page 2
VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT
COUNCILMEMBER RUSSO
COUNCILMEMBER FURTADO
COUNCILMEMBER MONROE
COUNCILMEMBER JABLIN
COUNCILMEMBER CLARK
02- 13 -1 ? ?8 03:2a °"1 =RAM IWJ�41SD'I 73 7751314 P.32
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS DEV!F1.OPMENT AGREEMYNT ('Agreement') made this day of January, 1998,
pursuant to Section 163.9220, Florida Statutes, by and between the CITY OF PALM BEACH GARnENS,
a Florida M11nicipal corporation CCity') whose address is 10500 North Military Trail, Psthn Beach Gardens,
Florida 33410, sad CHANN7NG CORPORATION ?GIX, a Florida corporation ( 'Chaswino whose address
is 4214 I�Torthzd 60th Drive, Boca Raton, Florida 33496.
I
RECITALS:
TIHEREAS, the City is empowered to and authorized to enter into this Agreement, pursuant to
Sections! 163.3220 and 165.3243, Florida Statutes;
' MEREAS, The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, an Tlhnois not- for -profit
corporation, whose address is 4400 PGA Boulevard, Suite 900, Paln} Beach Gardens, Florida $3410
( "Foundation") has consented to this Development Agreement as the owner iu fee simple of the Subject
Property, which is described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof;
WIM, REAS, Channing desires to submit an Application for:, concurrent processing of PUD
Approval Applications for residential and *mZed uses within the Subject Property together with the
Compre&nsive Land Use Plan ( "CLUP ") Amendment Petitions filed December 1, 1997, which uses are
identified on the map or illustration attached hereto as Exhibit "B ".
WHFREAS, Channing acknowledges and agrees that the review and approval of the CLUP
Amendments must occur prior to, or concurrent with approval of the aforementioned PUD Approval
App"ns;
WMREAS, Charming acknowledges that the City shall not commence concurrent processing of
PUD Approval Applications unless and until the CLUP Applientions are deemed euffncient and are
otherwise found complete by the City;
WLWJUL49, Cl±An-ing acknowledges and agrees that such concurrent processing is proceeding
and is contingent upon the fual approval by the City Council of the CLUP Applications and that the Site
Development Order for the PUD Approval Appli�,-kiotns must be cotimsteat with such actions, and that the
PUD Approval Applications will not be approved before final action' is taken by the City Council regarding
the CLUP Applications and small -scale amendment appeal period pursuant to 168.3187.2C has expired;
WEiEREAS, the City and Channing acknowledge and agree that con current review of thePUD
Approval Applications will result in a more comprehensively pl-ned project, as more particill —ly set forth
herein, Aid that allowing such concurrent review is in the best interest, of the City and Charming;
WHEREAS, the City finds as a matter of fact, that processing of the concurrent PUD Approval
Applications with the CLUP Applications is consistent with Resolution 148, 1996 of the City of PAi— Beach
Gardens; Florida;
53M (02/10/98) , ;
4: \C0AY=1.;q \lLT=PX3MT 'AGA.XXX
i -
02 -17 -1998 IWH1 S]N T'3 ? ^51:714 P.03
KOW,j THEREFORE, the City and Chanting for Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and
valuable consideration; including the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the receipt and sufficiency
of which is hereby acknowledged by each, hereby agrees as follows:
I. RECITATIONS. The recitations, statements and agreements set forth above are
acknowledged by the City and Charming to be true statements and agreements, and
correct, and are incorporated as a substantive and material part of this Agreement.
2 CONCURRENT..PRACESSING. The PUD Approval Applications shall be
reviewed and processed concurrently with the CLUP Applications for the Subject
Property. No other PUD Approval Applications shall be concurrently processed
with the CLUP Applications, except with the prior appror-al of the City Council.
3. PUD APPROVAL APP�44PAPQN9. The PUD Approval Applications shall
include all those items required pursuant to $ 118 -50 (4) of the City's land
Development Regulations.
4. TERM. This Agreement shalt continue for a period of twenty four months unless
earlier'terminated either by Foundation pursuant to the consent provisions set
forth below, or by the City in the event Planning and Zoning issues remain
unresolved in the concurrent processing of the CLUP Applications and the PL'D
k Approval Applications after the expiration of the twenty four month period:
IPARC: Additimnally. a?± -muld a fgrn+A! �rritten objection to the CLUP Applit--ctt±ons
be filed throuall -ARC (Intergovernmental Plan Amendment Review Qn*► - ittee)
Pursuant to that Interlocal Agreement entered into *the. City purse ■ -nt to.
Resolution 81, 1998, concurrent processing will terminate ipursuant to terms of
Resolution 148., 199,$, until such time as the for�±a1 written objection han been
wifhdrewn or resolved.
6. COMPLIANCE: Charming acknowledges and agrees that enn-irrent proeea'k+nd
as approved by the City Council shall at all tees be contingent upon compiliAnce
with all provisions of Resolution 148. 1996 and rhAt fain to so —ply with said
Resolution shall-result, in termination of concurrent procp-q?+ng.
i
7. AMENDMENTS. This Agreement may be amended' only by mutual written
consent of the parties.
8. SUCCE9801{� IN INTERF -5 T. This Agreement and any rights and
responsibilities hereunder are binding and inure to the benefit of the City,
Chanting and Foundations, as well as their respective successors and interests; and
aggian�
9. RZCQIiDING. After the City Council has approved this Agreement, the City
shall cause the Agreement to be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court in
P-1- Beach County. Chanting will be responsible for '
the costs of recording same.
10. GOVERNING � AW. This Agreement shAn be governed by the laws of the State
of Florida and judicial review and jurisdiction of any actions between the parties
to this Agreement shall be in Palm Beach County, Florida.
ssee (021W'pa),
A. \csaxaaA6\DEV=0PM Pr AGR.xxx
i;
02 -13-1998 03:30PM FROM MAT-iI3ON TO 7751014 P.04
i
I
i I
IN WIT N FM, WMRWF, the parties have hereunto set their hands and seals this day
Of January, 199C,
ATTES'I�: °CITY"
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA
By.
Linda Koeaer, City. Clerk Joseph Rum, Mayor ..
City Attorney
Approved as to form and legal sufficiency
3
"CHANNING (40RFORATION MW
CHANNING CORPORATION XXX
a Florida corpo don
JOEL CHANNING -
Ita: Presidebt
32 -13 -1333 33-31PM FROM MPTHISON TO 7751314 D.35
CONSENT
THE JO�N D AND CATHERINE T. MacARTHUR FOUNDATION, an Minos dot- for - profit
corporation ("Foundation ") hereby consents to this Agreement, as owner in fee simple of the Subject
Property subject �Co tbe) right of Foundation to tw-inRte this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written
notice to city anq} Chaoning in which event all zoning andlor other land, use applications being processed
by City with respect to the Subject Property shall be deemed withdrawn.
WrIWESSES: , "FOUNDATION'
Print Name
THE JOHN D. ,AND CATHEMIE T.
Mac ARTHUR FOUNDATION, an
n1inois not - for - profit corporation
By:
Its
i
STATE OF FWAMA
COUNTY OF PALL BEACH
I HERESY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer dulrauthorized in the State afor —id
and inthe Countyafore;�aid to take acknowledgements, appeared
[ ] personally tome known or ( j who has produced _
as identi%ation and acknowledged to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing
instrument.
i
WITNESS my hand and official seal in the County and State aforesaid this day of ,
199
(sew I
NOTARY PUBLIC
is
Sex (07/10/98) i+
A. NC3ANNIDIC \DRP$S49WM AGR. YRX
f
i
Print Name of Nouuy
Cc- -i—ion No.
My Commission Expires
4
02-10-1999 03:31PM =ROM MAT -IISON TO 7751014 P.06
STATE OF FLORIDA:'
COUNTY OF PAILM BEACH
I.
I HERE CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer d*authorized in the State aforesaid
and in the Count' -v' afbresaid to take acknowledgements, appeared
01 1
I 1perw- y ton�eknqwrior-[ ] who hasproduced
as identifimtion 4nd acknowledged to me to be the person described id and who executed the foregoing
insthmment-
W=Nzs6 my hand and official seal in the County and State aforesaid this day of
NOTARY PUBLIC
Print Name of Notary
No.
my Commission Expires
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PM BEACH
I kZREHY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly=thorized M the State aforesaid
and in the CourtWaforepaid to take wkzowledgementg, appeared
I pers=aUy t,6 me known or [ I who has produced
as ideutdlcaiiou ziad acknowledged to me to be the person described it and who executed the foregoing
instrument,
wrrNIks , S my hand and official seal in the County and State aforesaid this day of
199
At
(seal)
j'.
NOTARY PUBLIC
Print Name of Notary
Co--;,Xsioa No.
My Commi.don Expires
M
TOTPL P.06
02 -10 -1998 0c 39PM FROM MPT64ISON TO
,l
THE COH-MONS
i
;ff
i Parcel 1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
December 01, 1997
7771014 P.02
A parcel of loud situate in Section 11, Township 42 South. Range 42 Ecst. within the i
municipal fi' 't5 of the City of Polm Beach Gardens, POIm Beach County, rr lorida, and t
being more particularly described as follows
Bounded on the North by the South right-of-way line of P.G.A. Boulevard: bounded on
the Gvst b the West line of that certain parcel of land described in Officioi Records Hook
2539, of p e 93, public records of Poirn Beach County, Fiorido: bounded on the West
by the Eas r+Qh:t of way line of Avenue of the P.G.A. os shown on; the Plot One of i
Hansen -JON 0. AND (CATHERINE T. MACAF2THUR FOUNDATION, according to
the olat th eeof recorddQ in Plot Book 64 of oages 67 through 81; and bounded on the
South by t'e following described line: commencing at the northwest corner of that said
Parr of �e 'd described in Official Ktecord gook 2539, Page 93: thence South 01. 37'27"
West along the West line of said parcel described in Official Record; Hook 2529, Page 93
a distance f 419.97 feet: thence North 88' 21'42' West a distance of 100.00 feet: thence
South 62* 51'08" .West a distonce 'of 110.00 feet: thence South 88° 27'07" West
o distance f 141.77 feet: thence North 22' 30'17" West o distance of 192.57 feet thence
North 58' 2'33 West a distance of 115.00 feet to o point on the East line of said Avenue
of the P.G.Q.
Contoining ih oil5.188 acres rnpre ar less.
J
32 -10 -1999 02:40Pr1
i
1'
I
(
,
}
1
i
TO
FROM MAT' -i 190"
THE COMMONS
Parcel Z
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
December 01, 1997
7751014
4 parcetaf land ty" in Section 11, Townsnio 42 South. Range 42 East, Potrn Seoen
County, Florida, being more parLCularly vescr,oed as lot1cws;
P.03
COMr*ienc1n9 at the northeast corner of so.* Section it, thence Nor,U 4812-33" Nest
long. the ortn line of sold SeCbOn Ii (the North hne of ,aid Section 11 is assumed to
aeor 'North 8a' 22'33" West and allother bearings stated herein or'e relotive thereto) o
distance of 169.87 feet. thence aepartin4 said section ute South Or 37'27" west a
dstorict of 60,00 test to a point on the Norin right-of-way fine cf,P.G,A.8outevord and
the P,OIN7 OF SEGINNV4G of the hereinafter descnbea parcel of land: ihe++ce South
01' 31'22" west parallel with the fast tine of said Section n c distance of 169.61 feet to
a point on the West ridnt-Of-way tine of A4cicor Orive as shown an the plot thereaf.
recorded in Plot Book '777, Pages 122 and 123. Public Records of Pete, Eeoch County,
Florida, saiQQ RQqaft lying on a curve concave to the East, having a radius of 120 feet, a
i:entratanglt of 75.0'1/" and a rodielbearin of South 34.16'50" Colt. thence southerly
olong the are of said curve a distance of 1$7.30 feet to o point 61 compound curvature of a
curve concave to the East,navina a radius of 351.20 feet and a centralar+gle of 01' 40'37 ":
thence southerly along the arc of said curve a distance of 16.41 feet: thence deport n9 •ad
right•of -woy tie North 88.22'33" West a distonee o1 517,64 feet to a point on the East
line of o parcel of land described in OfficiolRecord gook 2539. Page 103, Public
Records of Palm Beach Cann v. Floridc: thence North Of' 37'33" East along the Eost fine
of. said porcelo distance of 35.00 feet to the northeast corner of laid Parcel: thence 5oufh
88'22'23" East along the South right-o( -wov tine of P.G,A. 8oulevoid a distance of
,552.74 feet to the POINT OF BCGfNNING.
1
i,Containing in o03.988 acres more or less.
HABIT "A"
Page 2
1 1
i
i
1
i
f
f
i
i
f
{
�I
{
1
i
i
}
i
4
1,
i
cl
w
t
72 -10 -1998 02:40PM, =ROM MAT,HISON TO 7751014 P.04
1 ,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
? December 01, 1997
I ;
A parcelaf land tying in Section 12. Townshio 42 South. Range 42 East. Pafm Beach
'County. Florida, being more oartictAcrty 0e3eribed os fonows-
Con+mancinQ at the northwest corner of laic Section 12: thence South 88. 37'35" East
olanq the North line of soil Section 12 (the North tine of sold Section 12 is 037Urned to
beor South Eta' 37135" Eost ono 0110ther bearings stated neroin are relative thereto) o
distance 'of 29 -82 feet: thence deporting scud Section line South 01. 22 "rS" 'Nest o
dhtlanee of 60.00 feet to the point of intersection of the South right-61-way time of P.G,A
9ovlevord with the East r�'ght-of -we ine of Hic><ory Dri "e oecording to the plot thereof,
recorded in Plat Boob 77. Pa es 122 and 123. Pubic Records! of Pont Beach County.
FlaredQ: thence South 88.37'5" East oionq the South right•cl•woy )ine.of P.G.4,
Sou)e`or5l a distance of 1799.64 feet to :+e northwest corner of a partefof land described
in Of(ici Record Boot. 3615, Page 1717. Pubic Recoras of Parn 'beach County.
Flarrd7: thence South 01' 33'39" West along the west tine of said parceto distance of
)72.87 feet: thence South 67' 37'39" West a distance of 335.09 feel to the point of
Survature of o our�e concave to the North. hovinq a radius of 95.00 feet. and a central
ongfe. of 32100'00". thence westerly clon , the or: of soic corve o distance of 53 06 feet to
the point of tohgency: thence North 80' 2_ "_1" West o distan4e of 300.00 feel to the 0oint
6f'aurvature of a cvtvea concave to the North, havingq a raariis of 95.00 feet and a central
onale of 25. 26'00 ": thence westerly along •ne orc of sold svrve o distance of 42.17 feet to
the point of tongency: thence North 54' "'21" west a distance of 155.04 feet: thence
South 82' 13'39" West o distance of 648.74 feet: thence South 01.31'35" west o distance
of, 25.02 feet to a North boundofV corner of P G.A. NabonalColf Club Estates. as
recorded in Plot Book 27. pages 206 ono 207, Public Recorda of Polm . Hooch Covnty,
Fforrdp: thence continue South 01' 31'35" West mono the West line of said plot o oistonce
of 38 81 feet; thence North 88' 28'25' West a distCnce of 326.73 feet: thence North
C1. 3r2''• East a distance of 258.09 feet to the POINT OF 8EG)NNINC.
Cantoin" rn olf 9.600 acres niore or leas
—TOTAL P.04
I p . .jj Hlibl 'Cl k.; �,rr ��ri'�NU �� �O(I'ti5u:a:�,IG J:)n.lo;,•'.�•
w k
m �
Ul
M �
R
hut log E it i1 b
j J Ila a a 3
so :
f Ll \
f
l �
apt: = #_
Z
f�
i M
W
c d 11-ON £t:ST 8661'01'ZO SdM OIOfilS NOIS30 Ndsan W021d
� I
I• I � Q
I I �
I I
C
I �
J
i
I
-Q
I c
11
fir, m
SosItAP.J%.IaA:IU.,
f
s
t
oo
ul
1 if I it
1 +1
8dM oian15 N9I530 Nus8n WOd3
91:ST 8661'8T'Z0
'
M
°3
i
m
cc
N
m "
r Q
CD
m
W
f
s
t
oo
ul
1 if I it
1 +1
8dM oian15 N9I530 Nus8n WOd3
91:ST 8661'8T'Z0
10
t
. A
41
r
,
i
t
,
I �
,
' a
,
r
£ 'd TT'ON OTIST 8661'0T'i0
I - 11 M
6 = -- --
edm OIOf115 HSIS30 NdeNn WOad
Cti N4 tt 1t(jbl bt
Q��
" lilii� ;;`•.hUi�dl;pll�sbuINeJP \.i;ln u;
�
co
�
s
t
cc
CQ
!
J
`
?
`�
d
'it
e
F
i1
0
s
Will
Q
J
I
�--
!
C
i
x
cc
In a
41
r
,
i
t
,
I �
,
' a
,
r
£ 'd TT'ON OTIST 8661'0T'i0
I - 11 M
6 = -- --
edm OIOf115 HSIS30 NdeNn WOad
February 18, 1998
Palm Beach Gardens City Council
10500 North Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, Fl. 33410
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
The Longwood Condominium Association together with the Condominium
Associations of Tamberlane, The Woodland Lakes, Camberwell and the homes
of the JDM hereby protest any and all approvals to change the zoning
designation of RH and RM to a mixed shopping and housing development on the
plots of land designated along the Avenue of the PGA and the PGA Boulevard.
Any such attempts to alter the long range plans of the City of Palm
Beach Gardens will be a matter for legal proceedings on our part.
We stand ready to meet with the Council planning and zoning Board to
state our objectives to the building of strip stores and rental units which
would seriously change the character of the development in this area.
We ask that we be informed about any and all meetings as a matter of
courtesy.
Very truly yours,
LONGWOOD CONDO ASSN.
� ' ..LaCt/St' / v 1, (�1.- ..++mss".+,. .[✓'url.G rC... ✓r
TAr ERIE CONDO MSN.
WOODLAND LAKES CONDO ASSN.
CAMBERWELL COND6 ASSN.
HOMES OF THE JDM
cc:
5 City Council Members
1 City Manager
1 City Clerk
ORDINANCE 1, 1998
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA,
PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 38-
88, SUBPARAGRAPH (a) OF THE CODE, ENTITLED
"CODES AND STANDARDS ADOPTED" OF
CHAPTER 38 ENTITLED "FIRE PREVENTION AND
PROTECTION ", TO UPDATE REFERENCES TO
STANDARD CODES; PROVIDING FOR
CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the City's Fire Prevention and Protection Code
needed to be amended to reflect a more recent reference to Standard Fire Codes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. Section 38 -88, Subparagraph (a) of the Code, entitled "Codes and
standards adopted" shall be amended to read as follows (added words underlined; deleted words
struck):
Sec. 38 -88. Codes and standards adopted.
( a) the Standard Fire Prevention Code, f 994 edition latest edition; the city fire
prevention standards, the rules and regulations of the state fire marshal; together
with any subsequent amendments or addenda are hereby adopted by reference and
made a part of this article as if fully set out herein.
SECTION 2. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby
repealed to the extent of such conflict.
SECTION 3. It is the intention of the City Council that the provisions of this ordinance
shall become and be made a part of the City of Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances.
SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall be effective upon adoption.
PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS DAY OF , 1998.
PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS DAY OF '1998.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 1998.
ORDINANCE 1, 1998
PAGE I OF 2
MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO
COUNCILWOMAN LINDA MONROE
VICE MAYOR LAUREN FURTADO COUNCILMAN ERIC JABLIN
COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND
LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK SUFFICIENCY.
VOTE:
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN MONROE
COUNCILMAN JABLIN
COUNCILMAN CLARK
CITY ATTORNEY
AYE NAY ABSENT
ORDINANCE 2 , 1998
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 2 OF THE
ORDINANCE 14, 1997 FOR A WAIVER OF THE ART IN
PUBLIC PLACES IMPACT FEE REQUIREMENT; AND,
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens approved a Planned Unit
development by Ordinance 14, 1997 for the expansion and renovation of former Holiday
Inn/MacArthur Vineyard currently known as DoubleTree Hotel located at the northwest corner of
PGA Boulevard and Interstate 95 Interchange;
WHEREAS, Amstar Texas Pool, LTD. has requested that a waiver of the requirements of
Ordinance 12, 1993, Art in Public Places, be granted for DoubleTree Hotel; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens hereby amends the
development order for the DoubleTree Hotel as originally approved by Ordinance 14, 1997 to include
the following condition of approval:
The Art In Public Places Impact Fee shall be waived.
Section 2. This Ordinance shall be effective upon adoption.
PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS DAY OF 11998.
PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS DAY OF , 1998.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF , 1998.
JOSEPH RUSSO, MAYOR
VICE MAYOR LAUREN FURTADO
COUNCIL WOMAN LINDA MONROE
COUNCILMAN ERIC JABLIN
ATTEST:
LINDA V. KOSIER
VOTE:
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN MONROE
COUNCILMAN JABLIN
COUNCILMAN CLARK
\bk
Ordinance 2, 1998
Page 2
COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND
SUFFICIENCY.
CITY ATTORNEY
AYE NAY ABSENT
ORDINANCE 3, 1998 2/9/98
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA,
PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO DIVISION 3
OF CHAPTER 2 OF THE PALM BEACH GARDENS
CODE OF ORDINANCES ENTITLED "EDUCATION
ADVISORY BOARD ", SPECIFICALLY SECTION 2 -132
"COMPOSITION; APPOINTMENT; TERMS ", SECTION
2 -135 "DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ";
PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, adopted
Ordinance 14, 1994, which created the Education Advisory Board, and subsequently amended
said Ordinance by Ordinance 6, 1995, and Ordinance 22, 1997;
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, has
determined that additional amendments need to be made to assist in, efficient operations for the
Education Advisory Board; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, has
determined that it would be beneficial to the Education Advisory Board to make requested
amendments.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, hereby
amends Section 2 -132 of Division 3 of Chapter 2 of the City of Palm Beach Gardens Code of
Ordinances, entitled "Composition; appointment; terms ", to read as follows: (added words
underlined; deleted words
Sec. 2 -132 Composition; appointment; terms.
( a) The education advisory board shall be composed of 15 regular members and 4
alternates, appointed by the city council for terms of two years, except that the
members of the first board to serve shall be appointed so that seven members shall
serve one -year terms, and five members shall serve two -year terms. Their
successors shall be appointed to two -year terms. No member may serve more
than - � - - - - - -* � ; «l�s four consecutive years on this board. All persons who
serve on the education advisory board as a regular member for a period of four
consecutive years, shall not be eligible for appointment to the board until the
ORDINANCE 3, 1998
PAGE 2 OF 3
expiration of the fifth vear from the date the person was appointed to the
education advisory board. However. the city council ;shall have the right to waive
the foregoing reauirement in the event no eligible candidate shall be available to
fill the, vacancy created on the board. Elis_ibility of a xenlacement candidate shall
be determined by the city council.
( b) The education advisory board shall include a "Student Coalition' to be composed
of students from schools listed in Section 2 -134. The student coalition shall elect
one, student as a spokesman for the purpose of casting a vote afforded to said
student coalition regarding all matters coming before the education advisory board
for a formal vote.
SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, hereby
amends subparagraph (11) of Section 2 -135 "Duties and responsibilities" to read as follows:
(11) Provide comments to the city council regarding proposed residential
developments and their impact LL�JVU LL1G lAVlal UMLLLIVG VL JVUVVIJ.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to ensure that the contents of this
ordinance be codified as part of the City Code of Ordinances.
SECTION 4. Should any section or provision of this ordinance, or any portion,
paragraph, sentence, or word thereof, be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be
invalid, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, but only
that part declared Lto be invalid.
SECTION 5. All Ordinances or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be effective upon adoption.
PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS DAY OF
PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS DAY OF
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF
, 1998.
)1998.
, 1998.
ORDINANCE 3, 1998
PAGE 3 OF 3
MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO COUNCILWOMAN LINDA MONROE
VICE MAYOR LAUREN FURTADO COUNCILMAN ERIC JABLIN
COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND
LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK SUFFICIENCY.
VOTE:
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN MONROE
COUNCILMAN JABLIN
COUNCILMAN CLARK
CITY ATTORNEY
AYE NAY ABSENT
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
Department of Growth Management
DATE: February 13,1998
TO: Bobbie Herackovich, City Manager
City Council Members
FROM: Roxanne Manning, Growth Management Director
RE: Petition SP- 97 -01: NorthMil Plaza Concerns & Revisions
The following concerns were raised at the February 5, 1998 Council Meeting regarding the NorthMil
Plaza petition. These issues have been addressed by staff and the petitioner as follows:
(1) A concern was raised regarding the appropriate nature of a Military Trail median cut so close
to the intersection with Northlake Boulevard. The petitioner stated that the median cut for
the shopping center entrance was required by the City as part of the traffic concurrency
review. Staff has on file an application to the State Department of Transportation for the
median cut from the petitioner dated several months before the petitioner applied to the City
for traffic concurrency. Although the City did not require the median cut as part of the
concurrency review, the concurrency was granted based on an analysis which included this
median cut. Staff is currently working to determine if additional concurrency review would
be needed should the median cut be deleted from the plan. Staff will have a definitive
answer by the next Council meeting.
It must also be noted that the right -of -way for Military Trail in this location may not be
located within the City's municipal boundaries. Staff is investigating this issue and will
have a definitive answer by the next Council meeting.
(2) The petitioner has agreed to condition # 19 providing for a crossing guard at the Military
Trail entrance crosswalk at the morning and afternoon hours designated for the Grove Park
Elementary School zone.
(3) The petitioner has addressed the concerns regarding the sight line conflict with the ten (10)
foot high sign in the Military Trail entrance median. The petitioner is proposing to replace
this sign with a two -sided "chevron" sign in a landscaped area to the north side of the
entrance road. (see attached) City Forester Mark Hendrickson and Building Official Jack
Hanson have no objections. Staff is recommending condition # 20 which states that "within
thirty (30) days of site plan approval, the petitioner shall amend all applicable plans to reflect
the proposed "chevron" monument sign on the north side of the Military Trail entrance."
cc: Greg Dunham
G: \Short Range \sp9701.meml.wpd
?► •
......END 6' ........:iT:fPRECAST
..:.�Ti_ 1,aGC+i„ ,.:_: •;- ::i::_.:.,..-." :.. <.- ?s:,.,.:�i::_.: •.:::i....::�z:
so
WUMETE
fig -� w►�' • �' ' •' � . _ ., � �.
♦ i • �� r
•
ui
000 %.
UJ •
•
.�
�/ .. • ♦ l
1�.��1r•'.fO _c_'_.�.a.f:.t
�Ij�f�� /l��tll��' 1� �I�Ll�IIW����
-- - -.�� /�C ��► ..�
�j 297.00
6' CHAINLINK-PANEL VIEW FENCE
_� •..
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Date: February 19.19$9
Subject/Agenda Item:
Consideration of Approval: Petition SP- 97 -01, by Henry Skokowski, agent for Northlake
Partners, is requesting a Site Plan approval for a proposed 91,063 square foot shopping
center to be named NorthMil Plaza. The proposed center will be anchored by an
"Albertson's" supermarket and will contain three "out- parcels" for future development. The
shopping center is to be located on a 11.5 acre parcel with a CG -1 General Commercial
zoning designation. The parcel is generally located at the northeast corner of Military Trail
and Northlake Boulevard (13- 42S -42E).
Recommendation/Motion:
Staff recommends aDDroval of Resolution 2. 1998_ with twenty tigm rnnrlifinnc of onnrnvml
Reviewed by:
Originating Dept.:
Costs: $_0
Council Action:
Total
City Attorney
Growth Management
[ ] Approved
Finance N/A
$ Q
[ ] Approved w/condwms
Current FY
ACM
[ ] Denied
Advertised:
Human Res. N/A
Funding Source:
[ ] Continued to:
Attachments:
Other N/A
Date:
[ ] Operating
Paper:
[ ] Other N/A
Resolution 2, 1998
Site Plan
Landscape Plan
Map: Site Area
Narrative: Revisions
Memos: City Manager,
Building Official, City
Engineer, City Forester,
Seacoast Director, Fire
Dept., Police Dept.
Sound Study Report
Letter: Albertson's
[ x ] Not Required
Letters: Homeowner
Submitted by:
Growth Management
Affected parties
Budget Acct. #::
Director
[ ] Notified
[ ] None
Approved by:
City Manager
[ x ] Not required
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Page 2
BACKGROUND:
Location. Zonina. and Land Use
Date: February 19, 1998.
Henry Skokowski, agent for Northlake Partners, is requesting a Site Plan approval for a
proposed retail center to be named NorthMil Plaza. The 11.5 acre site has a zoning
designation of CG -1 General Commercial. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation
Js Commercial. The site is bounded on the north by the Palm Beach Square residential
subdivision with an RL -1 Low Residential zoning designation; to the east by the Palm
Beach Square residential subdivision with an RL -1 Low Residential zoning designation and
commercial retail with a CG -1 General Commercial zoning designation; to the south by
commercial retail with a Palm Beach Gardens zoning designation of CG -1 General
Commercial and commercial retail with Palm Beach County zoning designation CN
:.Neighborhood Commercial; to the west by commercial retail with CG -1 General
Commercial designation. The subject site is bounded by Military Trail on the west and
Northlake Boulevard to the south.
Proposed Use
The proposed center will be anchored by a 50,157 square foot Albertson's Supermarket.
The center will also contain 28,306 square feet of additional retail space. The shopping
center will also contain three (3) outparcels. The two parcels along Military Trail are 0.77
acres and 0.59 acres in size and the outparcel along Northlake Boulevard will contain a
3500 square foot drive -thru restaurant. The outparcels are intended to be developed at a
later date as a restaurant without a drive thru, a financial institution with a drive thru or a
retail building. The total area for the main center and the three outparcels will be 91,063
square feet.
Agenda Cover Memorandum
15 feet
Date: February 19, 1998.
Page 3
Rear,
8 feet
8 feet
Front
50 feet
477 feet
yes
:. :
: :.....:........:...... redtA�v::::.:::.:::..::..;.;:.
;Prttxide�#.::::.:::::::::::::.
,::::::::::::, :.:.:.;::.::.; x.
e; :::: ..:::.::.
:.
Side
15 feet
51 feet
F
yes
�
Side Facing Street
40 feet
152 feet
yes
Rear
15 feet
66 feet
yes
t. X
..... : :::
1,380 feet of R.O.W. =
two ground signs
Required Number
393 (Disabled 8)
393 (Disabled 8)
yes
Stall Size
10 feet by 18.5 feet
10 feet by 20 feet
yes
>:
;:
:; . ....gip.... ..
1i; %
:': 3iiTyasii:
i? ii:? i`$':;i;:`•Y` ?::>
?ii2iii < ?i`::: iii% %:`•.`� #iii:'r:::i:: ? % ?: %i ?::':
Points
14,027
15,346
yes
Landscaped Buffers
property line
Front
15 feet
15 feet
yes
Side
15 feet
15 feet
yes
Side on R.O.W.
15 feet
15 feet
yes
Rear,
8 feet
8 feet
yes
Parking Areas
Every parking stall
Every parking stall
yes
within 40 feet of tree
within 40 feet of tree
Preservation
Section 98 -1 intent
One (1) Banyan tree
yes
preserved,
24 +/- Sable Palms
Ground Signs
1,380 feet of R.O.W. =
two ground signs
yes
two (2) ground signs
Setbacks
15 feet front property
15 feet
yes
line;
Greater than 50 feet
50 feet from side
property line
Dimensions
length =15 feet max.
length= 15 feet max.
yes
height--10 feet max.
height--10 feet max.
Area =60 square feet
Area =27.4 square feet
max.
max.
Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19, 1998.
Page 4
Wall Signs
1 per tenant elevation
1 per tenant elevation
yes
facing a R.O.W.
facing a R.O.W.
/� M : .::: .:.::.:: :i:::.
-Jift ....................... .. .. ..:.
ii:^ iiii: ti4:• iiiiiii4iiiiiiii 'v*:•ii:•iii:h:•
::v::. .. . �*
. a.. 7�(..:.... ..:... .f/.7 ►.......
•ii:viiiii:.i:i.i:.iiii': S:v:' iiiii::< ^i:h iiii }iX+ ^ ?i'Jii: � ii
:::>:: R:::`.:,::::::::::::: i:::::
:iiiiiii:i:::iiii ?i:'?
" " "i::::: iiiiiii:v'•:
i:: y.`.::_ i:' t:::: xi!............t it %%:RM;:::::::::::::cii:::: +:::
Color
Sec. 110- 37(c): "All
All letters to be
yes
signs shall be of
fabricated aluminum
uniform type, color and
channel letters with
material
blue acrylic faces and
internally illuminated
with white neon tubing.
Lighting
Sec. 118 -474 (4)
Average footcandle in
yes
Minimum 0.6
parking area = 3.78fc
footcandles in outdoor
Max. off site= .13 fc
areas, 1.0 footcandles
in vehicle use area
Buildina and Materials
The main retail center will contain 78,463 square feet, including the Albertson's
supermarket and other retail spaces. This building will have a maximum facade height of
36 feet. The west and south facing elevation will have a "light beige 1065" stucco exterior
for the main facade with "white 869" raised stucco banding along the top of the parapet
and below the tenant sign facade.
The covered walkway will be supported by columns running the length of the front retail
area. The two (2) foot concrete columns will have a "light beige 1065" stucco exterior with
a one (1) foot base with "Dark beige 1291" color six inch "light beige 1065" banding just
above. The top of the column will have a "white 869" colored band. The interior of the
covered walkway will have a "dark beige 1291" stucco finish. The aluminum storefront
frames will be colored "white 869." The main facade will feature circular architectural
accents two (2) feet in diameter and colored "1219 dark beige." The roof facade will
consist of a barrel the roof with a four (4) color blend mix of terra cotta and grey color
schemes.
The rear facing elevations will consist of "light beige 1065" exterior walls with a stucco
finish. There will also be several "white 869" aluminum "down spouts" running vertically
down the exterior walls. Rooftop equipment will be screened with an extension of the
stucco wall, which will run the length of the rear facing elevations.
Sianaae
Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19, 1998.
Page 5
Signage at NorthMil Plaza will consist of two monument ground signs and wall signs (one
(1) per tenant) on the main retail center. The Albertson's supermarket store sign will have
# 3630 -167 medium blue and #3630 -36 dark blue lettering with white outlines. All other
tenant signs will have blue acrylic faced lettering. All signs will consist of metal channel
letters with bronze trim caps.
The two identical monument ground signs will consist of an aluminum sign cabinet with a
"beige #1219" smooth stucco finish. Both signs will have the words " Albertson's" and
"NorthMil Plaza" on their copy area, with space allowing for one other tenant name. The
sign base will be covered with 12" x 12" ceramic tiles, the top row being "dark beige 1219"
.and the bottom two rows " light beige 1219." The lettering for " Albertson's" will include an
internally illuminated #732 white plexiglass letter faces with #3630 -167 medium blue and
#3630 -36 dark blue vinyl overlay. The lettering for "NorthMil Plaza" will include internally
illuminated sans -serif style letters with a #7328 white plexiglass letter faces with #3630 -36
dark blue vinyl overlay.
Jack Hanson has recommended approval for all signage for the site.
Parking
The number of required spaces for the proposed 78,463 square foot main retail building
is 393. The petitioner is proposing 393 spaces. The number of parking required for the
main retail building was calculated by the petitioner using the "Shopping Center"
classification found in the Land Development Regulations. This standard requires one
space per 200 square feet of gross floor area, excluding theaters. Parking standards using
the "Restaurant" criteria, however, require one space for each three seats plus one space
per employee on the shift of greatest employment. Staff is recommending that this criteria
be applied to any free standing restaurant constructed in any one of the three outparcels
to help alleviate parking space shortages in the future.
Landscaping
The petitioner has provided 15,346 points of landscaping. The Code requires 14,027
points of landscaping. The petitioner has provided 15 -foot landscaped buffers along public
right -of -ways and all other property boundaries in accordance with the Code. The petitioner
has also met the requirement that all parking spaces on site will be within 40 feet of a tree.
The petitioner has met the intent of the Code by preserving one (1) strangler fig tree and
24 +/- sabal palms.
In response to comments by the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee, the
landscape plan was revised to indicate column locations along the promenade and five (5)
Sabal palms along the northern elevation of the Albertson's. In addition, the landscape
Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19, 1998.
Page 6
plan has been revised to show an increase from 12 foot to 14 -16 foot trees along the
residential perimeter. The tree spread has been increased to 20 -25 feet and the caliper
increased from 5" to 51/2."
Traffic
Conditional traffic concurrency was determined by Assistant City Engineer Lynnette
Lanning in her memo dated October 23, 1996. Traffic concurrency was conditioned upon
the buildout date being no later than December 31, 1999.
The site plan includes dimensions for the right turn lanes and right -of -way dedications on
Military Trail.
Drainaoe
The petitioner has submitted a drainage statement which determined that legal positive
outfall will be achieved by using a "weir bleeder system which will connect to the existing
inlet located at the northeast comer of the site." In her October 23, 1996 memo, Assistant
City Engineer Lynette Lanning granted conditional drainage concurrency based on whether
or not the proposed outfall system can meet the City's performance standards.
The petitioner has also responded to site plan committee questions regarding wet retention
water treatment. The treatment used will be a combination of dry pre- treatment through
exfiltration trenches and the use of pollutant baffles at the drainage inlets throughout the
site.
The City Engineer had a concern that the 40- year -old drainage outfall system (existing on-
site inlet and piping) may have deteriorated to the point where it would inadequately drain
the developed site. The petitioner's engineer proposed that the development of the site
would actually decrease the volume of runoff into the outfall system. As requested by the
City Engineer, the petitioner submitted a videotaped surveillance of the outfall system to
verify its integrity. In addition, the petitioner submitted detailed drainage calculations to
verify that the volume of water flowing through the outfall system would decrease as a
result of site development. Assistant City Engineer Tammy Jacobs has indicated that the
drainage pipe appears in good condition. However, she does note that there is tree root
infestation in an existing catch basin on the site. She is recommending that this be cleared
and any structural damage repaired.
Lighting
The petitioner has submitted a photometric site plan showing the distribution of lighting foot
candles. The highest foot candle reading in the adjacent residential area is .13 foot
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Page 7
Date: February 19, 1998.
candles, below the minimum .6 foot candle required on site. The highest on -site foot
candle reading is 9.77 fc, located on the drive -aisle directly in front of the main retail
building (west elevation). The lowest foot candle reading is 0, located along the eastern
boundary, behind the main retail plaza. The code requires that there be an average foot
candle reading of 0.6 for general parking and pedestrian area and 1.0 in the vehicle use
area only. For this site, the average foot candle readings are 4.36 fc for the drive aisles,
and 3.78 fc for the parking areas. The average foot candle figures exceed the minimum
required by code. Ms. Jacobs has signed off on the revised lighting plan in her memo
dated August 12, 1997.
Staff has a concern that the 30 foot high parking lot light poles are too high due to the
adjacent residential area. The petitioner has responded to these concerns by lowering the
light poles along the northern and eastern boundaries to 20 feet.
Other Issues
The surrounding residents in the "Palm Beach Square" residential subdivision have
expressed concerns about the necessity of the development proposed for the property
adjacent to them. The petitioner has held several meetings with area residents concerning
this project. A neighboring City resident, Linda Peters of 1016 Woodfield Circle, has
expressed a concern for the necessity of an additional retail plaza in this vicinity (see
attached). Linda Garcia, another neighboring resident also expresses her concern about
additional commercial development along Northlake Boulevard (see attached).
Other concerns by residents and property owners, expressed at the Site Plan and
Appearance Review Committee, included:
1. Further congestion reducing access to Military Trail at Arbor Way and Northlake
Boulevard at Keating Drive.
2. The addition of a high traffic volume curb -cut along Military Trail and its interaction
with the existing sidewalk (utilized daily by Grove Park Elementary schoolchildren).
3. Safety concerns regarding the large wet retention area located on the eastern end
of the site.
4. Noise associated with loading activities in the rear of the shopping plaza.
5. Easy accessability to neighboring homes from the proposed development
(regarding criminal activity).
6. Overall intensity of commercial density along Northlake Boulevard is having a
detrimental effect on nearby City residential neighborhoods.
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Page 8
Date: February 19, 1998.
7. The adjacent commercial property owner on North lake Boulevard has expressed
concern to staff that the site's easternmost ingress along Northlake Boulevard is too
close to their westernmost egress and this could be a potential traffic hazard. The
conversion of the site's easternmost ingress /egress to a westbound egress -only
situation would alleviate the property owner's concern.
Staff Cgmmonfs
Planning and Zoning
As of the last City Council meeting, several issues were still of serious concern to Staff.
They are as follows:
(1) Tree Preservation:
Staff has a concern that the petitioner has not made every effort to meet the intent of
Section 98 -1 of the landscape code, which requires the preservation of trees. The
petitioner has proposed the preservation of (1) one strangler fig and the relocation on site
of +/- 24 sabal palm trees. The City Forester has commented, however, that the petitioner
has not done everything possible to prevent the removal of an old growth stand of slash
pine trees in the northeast corner of the site (see attached memo).
City Forester Mark Hendrickson has reviewed the petition and has commented in his
memo dated December 2, 1997 (see attached exhibit). The following is a summary of his
concerns:
(1) Additional landscaping should be added to the Northlake medians
(2) . Additional space is needed for the strangler fig preservation, especially now that the
Boston Market is no longer proposed.
(3) Additional tree preservation could be managed on site, particularly the stand of old
pine trees at the northeast corner of the site.
(4) Additional tall plantings could be managed along the front of the retail plaza to
create a more unified effect.
The petitioner has addressed the concern regarding the conflict between the conceptual
drainage plan and the preserved strangler fig.
The. Site Plan Appearance and Review Committee did not recommend conditions of
Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19, 1998.
Page 9
approval based on the City Forester's comments. Optimally, staff would like to see some
of Mr. Hendrickson's concerns addressed by way of a condition(s) of approval.
(2) Noise and Associated Nuisances:
Staff had a concern that loading and unloading activities may be disruptive to neighboring
residents due to their close proximity to the rear of shopping center and that this activity
will exceed the decibel levels permitted in Section 118 -299, Performance Standards. City
staff conducted a preliminary noise study at a comparable Albertson's site on Indiantown
Road in Jupiter. The results of the study indicate that noise levels produced by on -site
activity at a distance equivalent to the adjacent homes at NorthMil site exceed the
maximum decibel levels allowed by the City's performance standards. City staff hired an
independent acoustical engineer to conduct a sound study using data from both the subject
site and the test site at Indiantown Road. The City's engineering consultant has reached
the following conclusion:
The initial reading from the test site indicated LEQ (average) readings of 59.2 dB, in excess
of the code maximum of 55 dB. However, this reading was in absence of any type of noise
barrier or operational mitigation. The City's consulting engineer ;agreed that the noise level
readings could be reduced to below the maximum daytime levels required through
additional physical improvements to the site including:
a. The installation of an eight (8) foot wall along portions of the east and north
property lines
b. Enclosure of the loading area truck well
C. The installation of two (2) foot high sound absorption material as described
in the site plan dated January 6, 1998 along the eight foot wall
d. The installation of pavement markings and signage along the eastern and
northern drive aisles prohibiting the idling of delivery vehicles.
The petitioner has made the necessary revisions to the site plan to achieve the
recommended mitigation.
In addition to these improvements, staff is recommending the following conditions of
approval to mitigate excessive noise levels:
(a) All deliveries shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
(b) All refrigerated trucks shall be required to switch off refrigeration equipment while
on site.
(c) All vehicles shall be prohibited from stopping or standing with engines idling on the
Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19, 1998.
Page 10
north and east sides of the shopping center.
(d) The petitioner will agree to limit garbage collection to the hours between 8:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, to the best ability of the City's waste
collector, Waste Management, Inc.
(e) . Design and Operation of the property shall be conducted in such a manner so as
to avoid pure tones and impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and east
property lines, and mechanical and electrical equipment selected for the project
shall not emit pure tones or impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and
east property lines.
The City's Sound Consultant, Fernando Levi of Levi Engineering Corporation, has signed
off on the petitioner's sound mitigation plan.
(3) Parking
Staff feels that calculating parking for future "stand alone" restaurants utilizing the shopping
center criteria will not provide for adequate parking on the site, particularly if additional
restaurants open in the shopping center. To properly address this concern, staff is
recommending the following condition of approval:
(1) When the "future development areas" designated for restaurants are developed, the
parking calculations shall be based on the "Restaurant and Grill" criteria as defined
in Section 118 -476 of the City's LDRs.
(4) Pedestrian Safety
Planning and Zoning staff, neighborhood residents, and the Police Department have
expressed concern over pedestrian safety. Police Sergeant Jay Spencer has responded
to neighborhood concerns about pedestrian /vehicular conflicts, particularly at the proposed
Military Trail exit. Neighbors are concerned because this segment of Military Trail sidewalk
is used by children attending the Grove Park School. The Police Department has
documented evidence of accidents involving pedestrians at a similar exit onto Military Trail
at Gardens Park Plaza. To address these concerns, the Police Department is
recommending the relocation of the crosswalk at the Military Trail access road from
adjacent to Military Trail to a point midway between Military Trail and the parking lot. Also,
brick pavers should be utilized at the crosswalk point to emphasize the pedestrian crossing
area (this method was applied at Promenade Plaza). Sgt. Spencer also recommends
school crossing signage to caution drivers exiting the shopping center at the crosswalk
point (see attached). Thick vegetation and /or decorative barricades should also be utilized
to prevent pedestrians from crossing where there is no designated crosswalk. This design
Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19, 1998.
Page 11
has been endorsed by the Florida chapter of Crime Prevention Through Environmental
Design (CEPTED).
The petitioner has responded to these concerns by proposing a similar configuration to
what was suggested by the Police Department and the Planning and Zoning staff, as
shown in the January 6, 1998 site plan. The Police Department feels that this configuration
sufficiently addresses their concern.
In addition, staff is recommending the following conditions of approval be added to protect
pedestrians utilizing the Military Trail sidewalk during the time of construction of the
shopping center:
(1) Any modifications to the sidewalk on Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard shall be
done on an after -hours basis so as not to interrupt continuous pedestrian use of
those sidewalks during the day.
(2) The speed hump shall be indicated on the construction plans to be extended across
both ingress and egress travel lanes prior to construction plan approval.
Engineering
Assistant City Engineer Tammy Jacobs has reviewed the petition and notes in her
December 17, 1997 memo that all issues are satisfied or conditionally satisfied with the
exception of the entry design at the Military Trail entry drive (see attached comments, issue
#11). Ms. Jacobs has indicated her satisfaction with the recommended condition of
approval regarding the speed hump.
Building
Building Official Jack Hanson has examined the drawings and documents regarding
signage and recommends approval of both the project identification signs and the wall sign
criteria. He endorses the tenant sign guide lines as presented (see attached exhibit).
Police
See "pedestrian safety"
Fire Department
No further concerns at this time.
Seacoast Utilities
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Page 12
No further concerns at this time.
Date: February 19, 1998.
At its September 2, 1997 meeting, the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee
recommended approval by a 4 -3 vote with the condition below. The dissenting members
indicated their concerns with the outstanding safety issues and whether a new shopping
center was needed. Staff recommended denial of the petition to the Committee. The
Committee recommended approval with the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall dedicate the 10 feet of right of way along Military Trail to the
FDOT prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit.
2. The applicant shall dedicate the six feet of additional right of way along Northlake
Boulevard to Palm Beach County prior to the issuance of the first building permit.
3.. The applicant shall provide detailed design calculations for onsite drainage
improvements as well as possible outfall improvements before construction plan
approval.
4. The applicant shall submit a boundary plat, suitable for recording, for review and
approval by the City Council before the issuance of the building permit.
5. When the Future Development Area #1 and Future Development Area #2 are
constructed, the vehicular access for each parcel shall be limited to the internal
north -south drive aisle.
6. Any modifications to the sidewalk on Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard be done
on an after -hours basis so as not to interrupt continuous pedestrian use of those
sidewalks during the day.
Recommendation
Staff has attempted to identify and address all the concerns related to the construction
of this project. Because the applicant has met all staffs requests, with the exception of a
complete site redesign, and addressed staffs concerns through agreeing to the attached
conditions, the proposed project meets all applicable City Codes. Because this project site
has existing Commercial zoning and land use, and because the project meets all
applicable City codes staff must recommend approval of this project with the following
conditions:
(1) The applicant shall dedicate the ten (10) feet of R.O.W. along Military Trail to the
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) prior to the issuance of the first
Building Permit. (Building Division, Development Compliance Officer)
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Page 13
Date: February 19, 1998.
(2) The applicant shall dedicate the 6 feet of additional right of way along Northlake
Boulevard to Palm Beach County prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of
Occupancy. (Building Division, Development Compliance Officer)
(3) The applicant shall provide detailed design calculations for onsite drainage
improvements as well as possible outfall improvements before construction plan
approval. (City Engineer, Building Division)
(4) The applicant shall submit a boundary plat, suitable for recording, for review and
approval by the City Council before the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.
(City Engineer)
(5) When the "Future Development Area # 1" and "Future Development Area #2" are
constructed, the vehicular access for each parcel shall be limited to the internal
north -south drive aisle. (City Engineer, Planning and Zoning Division)
(6) Prior to Construction Plan approval of the "Typical Exfiltration Trench Detail" and
data in Exhibit "c" shall be reconciled. (City Engineer, Development Compliance
Officer)
(7) The existing drainage inlet (catch basin number 5) shall be replaced with a new inlet
or properly cleaned of tree roots and any structural drainage repaired prior to
certification of occupancy. (City Engineer)
(8) Any modifications to the sidewalk on Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard be done
on an after -hours basis so as not to interrupt continuous pedestrian use of those
sidewalks during the day.(Building Division, Development Compliance Officer)
(9) The applicant shall secure a permit from F.D.O.T. for the sidewalk to be placed
outside the Military Trail R.O.W. prior to construction plan approval. (Development
Compliance Officer, City Engineer)
(10) The Boundary Plat shall convey public access to the sidewalk to be placed outside
the Military Trail R.O.W. prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.
(Development Compliance Officer, City Engineer)
(11) The speed hump shall be indicated on the construction plans to be extended across
both ingress and egress travel lanes prior to construction plan approval. (City
Engineer)
(12) All deliveries shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. (Development
Compliance Officer, Code Enforcement)
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Page 14
Date: February 19, 1998.
(13) All refrigerated trucks shall be required to switch off refrigeration equipment while
on site. (Development Compliance Officer, Code Enforcement)
(14) All vehicles shall be prohibited from stopping or standing with engines idling on the
north and east sides of the shopping center. (Code Enforcement, Development
Compliance Officer)
(15) The petitioner will agree to limit garbage collection to the hours between 8:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, to the best ability of the City's waste
collector, Waste Management, Inc. (Code Enforcement, Development Compliance
Officer).
(16) Design and Operation of the property shall be conducted in such a manner so as
- to avoid pure tones and impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and east
property lines, and mechanical and electrical equipment selected for the project
shall not emit pure tones or impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and
east property lines. (Code Enforcement, Building Department)
(17) When the "future development areas" are developed, the parking calculations shall
be based on the criteria as defined in Section 118 -476 of the City's LDRs for each
individual use. (Planning and Zoning Division)
(18) All shopping center signage shall be internally - illuminated blue acrylic -faced
lettering.
(19) The applicant shall provide, at their own expense, a crossing guard certified by the
City of Palm Beach Gardens Police Department at the shopping center's Military
Trail entrance crosswalk during the morning and afternoon school hours, as
designated for the Grove Park Elementary School zone.
(20) Within thirty (30) days of site plan approval, the petitioner shall amend all applicable
plans to reflect the proposed "chevron" monument sign on the north side of the
Military Trail entrance.
\eat
G: \Short Range \SP9701.ST3.wpd
RESOLUTION 2,1998
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR
APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A 91,063 SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER TO BE
NAMED NORTHMIL PLAZA AND LOCATED ON AN 11.6
ACRE PARCEL AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
MILITARY TRAIL AND NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD;
PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND,
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the petitioner, Northlake Partners, is requesting site plan approval for the
construction of a 91,063 square foot shopping center to be named Northmil Plaza and located on
an 11.6 acre parcel at the northeast corner of Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard;
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed petition is consistent with
the City's Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The City Council hereby approves the site plan for a 91,063 square foot shopping
center to be named Northmil Plaza and located on an 11.6 acre parcel at the northeast comer of
Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard, as described in attachment "A ", which is incorporated as
part of this resolution.
Section 2. Said construction shall be in accordance with plans on file with the City's
Planning and Zoning Division as follows:
1. January 6, 1998 Site Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet
2. January 6, 1998 Landscape Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet
3. December 12, 1997 Detail Sheet, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet
4. January 6, 1998 Landscape Details, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet
5. July 3, 1997 Military Trail Landscape Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet
6. October 9, 1997 Architectural Elevations, Ted Davis and Associates, Sheet A -1
7. August 19, 1997 Architectural Elevations, Ted Davis and Associates, Sheet A -2
8. January 6, 1998 Architectural Elevations, Ted Davis and Associates, Sheet A -3
9. January 27, 1997 Architectural Elevations, Ted Davis and Associates, Sheets A-4 and A -5
10. October 10, 1997 Sign Details, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet
11. December 12, 1997 Lighting Plan and Notes, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet
12. December 21, 1997 Conceptual Drainage Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet
13. February 11, 1998 NorthMil Plaza Sign Relocation, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet
Section 3. Approval is based on the following conditions of being met:
(1) The applicant shall dedicate the ten (10) feet of R.O.W. along Military Trail to the Florida
Department of Transportation (FDOT) prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit.
(Building Division, Development Compliance Officer)
(2) The applicant shall dedicate the 6 feet of additional right of way along Northlake Boulevard
to Palm Beach County prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. (Building
Division, Development Compliance Officer)
(3) The applicant shall provide detailed design calculations for onsite drainage improvements
as well as possible outfall improvements before construction plan approval. (City Engineer,
Building Division)
(4) The applicant shall submit a boundary plat, suitable for recording, for review and approval
by the City Council before the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. (City Engineer)
(5) When the "Future Development Area # 1" and "Future Development Area #2" are
constructed, the vehicular access for each parcel shall be limited to the internal north -south drive
aisle. (City Engineer, Planning and Zoning Division)
(6) Prior to Construction Plan approval of the "Typical Exfiltration Trench Detail" and data in
Exhibit "c" shall be reconciled. (City Engineer, Development Compliance Officer)
(7) The existing drainage inlet (catch basin number 5) shall be replaced with a new inlet or
properly cleaned of tree roots and any structural drainage repaired prior to certification of
occupancy. (City Engineer)
(8) Any modifications to the sidewalk on Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard shall be done
on an after -hours basis so as not to interrupt continuous pedestrian use of those sidewalks
during the day.(Building Division, Development Compliance Officer)
(9) The applicant shall secure a permit from F.D.O.T. for the sidewalk to be placed outside the
Military Trail R.O.W. prior to construction plan approval. (Development Compliance
Officer, City Engineer)
(10) The Boundary Plat shall convey public access to the sidewalk to be placed outside the
Resolution 2, 1998
Page 2
Military Trail R.O.W. prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. (Development
Compliance Officer, City Engineer)
(11) The speed hump shall be indicated on the construction plans to be extended across both
ingress and egress travel lanes prior to construction plan approval. (City Engineer)
(12) All deliveries shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. (Development
Compliance Officer, Code Enforcement)
(13) All refrigerated trucks shall be required to switch off refrigeration equipment while on site.
(Development Compliance Officer, Code Enforcement)
(14) All vehicles shall be prohibited from stopping or standing with engines idling on the north
and east sides of the shopping center. (Code Enforcement, Development Compliance Officer)
(15) The petitioner shall agree to limit garbage collection to the hours between 8:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m. Monday through Saturday, to the best ability of the City's waste collector, Waste
Management, Inc. (Code Enforcement, Development Compliance Officer).
(16) Design and operation of all improvements on the property shall be conducted in such a
manner so as to avoid pure tones and impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and
east property lines, and mechanical and electrical equipment selected for the project shall not
emit pure tones or impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and east property lines.
(Code Enforcement, Building Department)
(17) When the "future development areas" are developed, the parking calculations shall be based
on the criteria as defined in Section 118 -476 of the City's LDRs for each outparcel use
individually. (Planning and Zoning Division)
(18) All shopping center signage shall be internally - illuminated blue acrylic -faced lettering.
(19) The applicant shall provide, at their own expense, a crossing guard certified by the City of
Palm Beach Gardens Police Department at the shopping center's Military Trail entrance
crosswalk during the morning and afternoon school hours, as designated for the Grove Park
Elementary School zone.
(20) Within thirty (30) days of site plan approval, the petitioner shall amend all applicable plans
to reflect the proposed "chevron" monument sign on the north side of the Military Trail
entrance.
Section 4. This resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
Resolution 2, 1998
Page 3
INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF FEBRUARY 1998
MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND
LINDA V. KOSIER SUFFICIENCY.
VOTE:
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN MONROE
COUNCILMAN JABLIN
COUNCILMAN CLARK
Resolution ,1998
Page 4
CITY ATTORNEY
AYE NAY ABSENT
G: \Short Range \SP9701.RE3.wpd
RESOLUTION 13, 1998
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR AN
AMENDMENT OF RESOLUTION 86,1996 AMENDING THE
APPROVED SITE PLAN FOR PARCEL M -22 OF PGA
NATIONAL, PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT, BY
MODIFYING LANDSCAPING AND PHASING PLANS,
ADDING SIX (6) PARKING SPACES, COVERING 90
PARKING SPACES, ELIMINATING THE RESIDENT DROP -
OFF AREA AT PHASE II BUILDING, AND ADDING
SIDEWALKS; PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE
APPROVED SITE PLAN FOR PARCEL M -22; REPEALING
SELECTED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ADOPTED IN
RESOLUTION 86,1996, AND CORRECTING CONDITIONS
OF APPROVAL; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens adopted Resolution 110,
1987 which was subsequently amended by Resolution 42, 1991 and Resolution 106, 1992 which
subsequently redesign the approved project; Resolution 60, 1995 which approved a minor revision
to the architectural plans; Resolution 86, 1996 which approved the Devonshire Life Care Facility;
and approved other modifications and Resolution 41, 1997 which approved a replat of Devonshire
of the PGA National Resort Community.
WHEREAS, the Devonshire Associates, Ltd. Company is requesting to amend Resolution
86, 1996 by modifying the landscaping and phasing plans, adding six (6) parking spaces, covering
90 parking spaces, eliminating the resident drop -off area at phase II building and adding sidewalks;
WHEREAS, the City's Planning and Zoning staff has reviewed the petition and determined
that it is sufficient; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed amendment is consistent with
the City's Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
Section L. Resolution 86, 1996 is hereby amended by modifying the landscaping and
phasing plans, adding of six (6) parking spaces, covering 90 parking spaces, eliminating the resident
drop -off area at phase II building, and adding sidewalks.
Section 2. Construction of said development shall be in accordance with the following plans
on file with the City's Planning and Zoning Department:
1. December 17, 1997 Entry Feature, Mouriz Salazar, 1 Sheet
2. December 9, 1997 Site Plan, Mouriz Salazar, 1 Sheet.
3. January 9, 1998 Site Paving Plan, Corral - Howard Collaborative, sheet LH -1.
4. February 8, 1998 Site Planting Plan, Corral- Howard Collaborative, sheet LP -1.
5. November 21, 1997 Pool & Courtyard Paving Plan, Corral- Howard Collaborative, sheet
LH -2.
6. November 21, 1997 Pool & Courtyard Dimensioning Layout, Corral- Howard
Collaborative, sheet LH -3.
7. November 21, 1997 Pool & Courtyard Details, Corral- Howard Collaborative, sheet LH4 .
8. November 21, 1997 Grading Plan: Pool & Courtyard, Corral- Howard Collaborative, sheet
LG -1.
9. November 21, 1997 Main Turn- Around Planting Plan, Corral'- Howard Collaborative, sheet
LP -2.
10. November 21, 1997 Pool & Courtyard Planting Plan, Corral - Howard Collaborative,
sheet LP -3.
Section 3. The conditions of approval set forth in Section 2 of Resolution 86, 1996, are
hereby corrected and the following conditions shall replace them, with site plan approval conditioned
upon compliance with the following:
1. The support services within the central facility shall be available for the use only to residents
of the life care facility. Dining room facilities may also be used by guests.
2. No external signage regarding the support services as referenced shall be allowed for the uses
within the central facility.
3. Barriers shall be placed around the northwest landscape buffer (prior to and during the
construction phases) for protection.
4. The removal of all exotic plants (melaleuca, brazillian pepper and australian pine) from the
site and assurance of their elimination in perpetuity through the project's landscape
maintenance program shall be required.
5. To the extent that the landscape /vegetation density of the northwest buffer is diminished
when the exotic plants are removed, the developer will replace same with additional foliage
Resolution 13, 1997
Page 3 2
of some type to the satisfaction of the City Forester so as to maintain the buffer area.
6. The following contingency plan shall be enacted to replace those trees and palms that die
during or as a result of construction within the northwest landscape buffer area: three inches
of new tree caliper will replace every one inch of caliper lost; palms to be replaced one -for-
one. Replacement shall be done prior to the first building Certificate of Occupancy or as
deemed appropriate by the City Forester.
7. Prior to the issuance of Certificate of Occupancy for each building, the landscaping and
amenities around the building shall be inspected and approved by the City Forester, and the
Landscape Architect of record. V
6 l 5`� rn
8. Three (3) additional specialty paving details have bee added to the paving plan prepared by
Corral- Howard Collaborative. The three details n to be revised to more specifically call
out the specifications noted in the "Grading and D ainage Notes on Sheets 10 of 13 of the
approved Engineering Plans" prepared by C.C.L. Consultants, Inc.
9. The new covered entry on the southwest comer of the building and the gatehouse shall
provide a clearance height of 13' -6 ", the same as all other entryways.
10. The security gates shall provide a clear opening width of 14 feet and shall be equipped with
a KNOX key switch for emergency access.
11. Project signage shall return for review and approval by the City's Growth Management
Department.
12. If the grass parking reserve is going to be utilized prior to being paved, the applicant shall
comply with Section 118 -478 entitled "Grassed Parking" of the City's Land development
Regulations.
13. Water levels in the lakes shall be maintained by a methodology satisfactory to the City Staff
and City Engineer.
14. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, a lighting plan for the parking lot
which meets the criteria set forth in Section 118- 474(4)entitled "Lighting ", of the City's
Land Development Regulations shall be provided.
Section 4. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF FEBRUARY 19, 1998.
Resolution 13, 1997.
Page 3 3
ATTEST:
LINDA V. KOSIER
BY:
JOSEPH RUSSO, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND
SUFFICIENCY.
CITY ATTORNEY
VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN MONROE
COUNCILMAN JABLIN
COUNCILMAN CLARK
Resolution 13, 1998
Page 4
G: \SHORTR- 1 \SP9716.RE 4
I
I �- .tee.,• PHA3E r �
/r I
r,�11
g
co
ril
X
t�
u u
_ _- -- § ' i
pop
V
t+D MOURIZ w ! DEVONSHIRE - SITE PLAN
1 AR'A\t�./wZAR � row wnau�
CHITECTS 3 PLAINER '•w da a C*a Roam&
�: = s ==k-�.
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Date: February 19, 1998
Subject/Agenda Item:
Consideration of Approval of Resolution, 1998 (Petition MISC- 97 -27), a request for an
amendment to Section 5 of Resolution 28, 1996 which reads "the Planned Unit
Development shall have the recordation of all plat(s) and the installation of all
infrastructure and common landscaping prior to December 31, 1997' to allow for a two
(2) year time extension for the total build -out of the project, including the installation of all
infrastructure and common landscaping prior to December 31, 1999. The 2.94 acre site
is generally located at the southwest comer of RCA Boulevard and Prosperity Farms Road
(8- 42S -43E).
Recommendation /Motion: ,
Staff recommends approval of Resolution 1 I I , 1998.
Reviewed by:
Originating Dept.:
Costs: $ 0
Council Action:
Total
City Attorney
Growth Management
[ ] Approved
Finance N/A
$ p
[ ] Approved w /conditions
Current FY
ACM
[ ] Denied
Human Res. N/A
Funding Source:
[ ] Continued to:
Advertised:
Other N/A
Date:
[ ] Operating
Attachments:
Paper:
[ x ],Not Required
[ ] Other N/A
Resolution , 1998
Memo: City Forester
Submitted by:
Memo: City Engineer
Justification Statement
Department Director
Affected parties
[ ] Notified
Budget Acct. #:
[ ] None
Approved by:
City Manager
[ x ] Not required
BACKGROUND:
Urban Design Studio, agent for Dr. Mark Damerau, is requesting a two year time extension
for the four office building, 33,300 square foot Planned Unit Development. The resolution
adopting this PUD, Resolution 20, 1996, required that the platting, landscaping and
infrastructure be completed before December 30, 1997. The petitioner is requesting that
Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19, 1998
Page 2
an additional two (2) year time extension beyond this date be granted for the complete
buildout of the project.
The petitioner has provided the required "good faith criteria" to staff. The petitioner
indicates that he has spent approximately $135,000 dollars for site improvements and
associated soft costs. In addition, the petitioner has indicated that they have secured
permits from the Army Corp of Engineers and have submitted plans to Seacoast Utilities,
Palm Beach County, South Florida Water Management District and the City's Engineering
Consultant. The submittal of the "good faith criteria" complies with the City Code.
The traffic generation for this project is less than 1,000 average daily trips. If a project is
less than 1,000 average daily trips, the City Engineer's Office has indicated that a revised
traffic analysis is not required.
Location, Zoning and Land Use
The current land use for this site is Professional Office (PO). The current zoning
designation for this site is Professional Office (PO). For a complete list of adjacent existing
uses, land uses and zoning districts, please see Table 1.
........
Subject Property:
Professional Office (PO)
Professional Office (PO)
Vacant
North:
Palm Beach County
Palm Beach County
Mobile Home Park
Residential Mobile Home
Residential Mobile Home
South:
Professional Office (PO)
Professional Office (PO)
Vacant
East:
Village of North Palm
Village of North Palm
Sanctuary Cove
Beach Residential R -3
Beach Residential R -3
Apartments
West:
Professional Office (PO)
Professional Office (PO)
Vacant
Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19, 1998
Page 3
Zoning:
Required /Allowed Provided Compliance Waiver
PUD /PO
Requested
Underlying Land
Consistent with Future Professional Office yes
Use/
Permitted Use
Land Use Element of the (PO)
Comprehensive Plan
Development Area
No minimum size 2.94 acres yes
required
Open Space
15 percent gross area 41% yes
Requirements
of the Planned Unit
Development
Zoning: PO
Required /Allowed Provided Compliance
Building Site Area
minimum of 15,000 126,324 yes
square feet
Building Site Width
minimum lot width of 395 feet yes
100 feet
Building Lot
Maximum Building Lot 17.4% yes
Coverage
Coverage of 35%
Building Height Limit
No structure shall 29.5 feet yes
exceed 36 feet
Setbacks
Front = 35 feet 2 stories Yes
41.4 feet
Side and Rear = 2 stories Yes
first 2 stories = 15 feet Side = 25 feet
above 2 stories = 12 Rear = 15 feet
additional feet
Parking
Required Number
111 111 yes
Stall Size
18.5 feet X 10 feet 18.5 feet x 10 feet yes
I
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Page 4
Date: February 19, 1998
Landscaping
Points
5,082
6,371
yes
Landscaped Buffers
8 feet, 15 feet along
8 feet, 15 feet along
yes
ROW
ROW
Parking Areas
Every parking space
Every parking space
yes
within 40 feet of a tree
within 40 feet of a tree
Preservation
Section 98 -1 "intent"
4 existing live oak
Yes
trees, tree preservation
buffer
Signs
Ground Signs
635 feet ROW frontage
1 ground sign
Yes
= 1 ground sign
permitted
Setbacks
15 feet from the front
15 feet from the side
No
yes
property line , 50 feet
property line, 29 feet
from the side property
from the side property
line.
line
Dimensions
15 foot length
12 foot length
Yes
10 foot height
6 foot height
60 sq. ft. face area
40 sq. ft. face area
max
Wall Signs
No tenant wall signs
Yes
approved
Staff Comments
Planning and Zoning
Planning and Zoning staff has a concern that the landscape plan approved by Resolution
28, 1996 will not be successful due to requirements placed on -site by the South Florida
Water Management District. Due to the fact the site is highly susceptible to flooding, the
District is requiring an elevation increase of 36 inches. Due to their close proximity to
proposed buildings and parking areas, raising the site to this level may kill existing live oak
trees which were proposed to be kept on site. Staff is recommending that, as a condition
to the time extension approval, the petitioner submit a new landscape plan which will
indicate how tree preservation will be maintained with the proposed elevation increase.
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Page 5
City Engineer
See Attached.
Building
No comments
Seacoast Utilities
No comments
Fire Department
No comments
Police Department
No Comments
Northern PBC Improvement District
No comments
Date: February 19, 1998
Staff Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of this petition with the following condition:
(1) Within thirty (30) days of approval of this resolution, the petitioner shall submit a
landscape plan showing adequate tree preservation which meets the approval of
the City Forester.
156174602'-'2 -8= 1H 1JF I TER
NIENIOP. -kyDUM
TO: Marty Minor
FROM: Tammy Jacobs
DATE: February 4, 1998
13-S °02 728 05 '88 09:21
SUBJECT: Village Square Professional Park (fka Damerau Office Park) (#95 -2035)
We have reviewed the application for a time extension for the completion of the referenced
development as stated in Section 5 of Resolution 28, 1996.
Section 5 of Resolution 28, 1996 states the following:
"The Planned Unit Development shall have the recordation of an plat(s) and the
installation of all infrastructure and common landscaping prior to December 31, 1997."
The applicant is requesting that Section 5 be modified as follows:
"The Planned Unit Development shall have the recordation of all plat(s) and the
installation of all infrastructure and common landscaping prior to December 31, 1999."
We offer the following comments:
1) Section 118- 46(f)(3)b. states that the City Council may approve a time extension not -to-
exceed two (2) years. Therefore, the two (2) year maximum allowable time for the
completion of this project computes to December 31, 1999.
2) The Traffic Generation for this project is less than 1000 average daily trips. We are of the
opinion that a new Traffic Impact Analysis is not required as part of this consideration
which complies with Section 1'18- 46(f)(2)3.(i).
3) The applicant has provided a narrative verifying the "good faith" efforts of the developer
which complies with Section 118- 46(f)(2)3.(ii).
Iri
PApbpucmoa03 _ J
c: Greg Dunham
Roxanne Manning
City Of P.B.G.
FE'1 5 1998
VLANNiNG
t�
ZONING
DAMERAU OFFICE PARK
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
DECEMBER 22 , 1997
This request is for a two year time extension for compliance with Section 5 of Resolution 28, 1996
which requires the recordation of plats and the installation of infrastructure and common landscaping
by December 31, 1997. This application is also a request for a two year time extension of the
ultimate build out date for the project to December 1999.
In accordance with Section 118 -46 (f)2(3)ii "Good Faith" criteria, please accept the following:
■ Since the approval of this PUD Dr. Damerau has employed the services of two law
firms, 2 project consultants, 2 traffic engineers, a soils engineer, a civil engineer, a
land use firm, a construction company, a trucking company, and 2 land clearing
companies. Since the approval of the project he has spent approximately $ 135,000.
These consultants were retained to prepare the necessary paperwork to prepare the
plats and engineering plans, to secure the necessary permits and approvals, and to
prepare the property for development.
■ Currently the project has secured its Army Corp of Engineers approvals and permits,
and has submitted the engineering plans and plats for review and approval to
Seacoast Utilities, Palm Beach County Engineering department, South Florida Water
Management and the City of Palm Beach Gardens Engineering consultant.
■ To date the project has received approval for the clearing of the exotic vegetation and
the demolition of an existing building. Dr. Damerau is prepared to proceed with
compliance with all requirements for dedications, site improvements and
establishment of surety as required by the City in accordance with the review and
approval process associated with the approval of the engineering plans and plat.
■ Dr. Damerau has had several interested parties in the purchase and/or joint venture
of the project including the potential purchase of the property to the south of the PUD
which would have provided the funding for the infrastructure. This purchase was
contingent on the development of an ACLF which was ultimately denied by the City.
Ongoing negotiations are currently in progress which may produce a sale for the land
south of the PUD as well as the uncommitted lots within the PUD, all of which are
contingent on the time extension.
Through a series of unfortunate incidents the ability of Dr. Damerau to complete his project has been
delayed. He has committed a great deal of time, energy and money into the review, approval and
development of the project since its approval. Dr. Damerau continues to be very committed to the
concept of the project and is anxious to proceed. He has hired a project manager to oversee the
construction process and is very close to having all issues addressed and resolved regarding the final
approval of his engineering plans and plat. It is anticipated that final approval of the plans could be
accomplished within the next 90 days. The City Councils consideration of approval of this request
is greatly appreciated.
M
Memo to File
From: Mark Hendrickson, City Forester fit 1 d—
Subject: MISC- 97 -27, Damerau Office Park Time Extension p
Date: January 22, 1998
I have reviewed the application for the above - referenced time extension. It has come to my
attention, over the past year of working with Dr. Mark Damerau, that the engineer's paving and
drainage plans are in conflict with the Oak tree protection approved by the landscape plan.
Specifically, the proposed final floor elevation will require more dirt fill on site than anyone
imagined during the site plan process. At this time, I have a major concern that the approved
landscape can not be accomplished, or to engineer the protection of 'the four large Oak trees is
impractical considering. the close proximity of the buildings and parking lots within Phase II.
Phase I ( Dr. Damerau's office) appears to be free of any Oak tree conflict.
Having said this, I continue to support this project and in no way want to prevent the approval of
the time extension. Therefore, I recommend the following condition of approval to address my
afore- mentioned concern:
Prior to the issuance of the second building permit, the petitioner shall submit detailed
paving and drainage plans /tree protection plans specifically for the preservation of the
four Oak trees shown on the approved landscape plan to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and City Forester. If one or more Oak trees cannot be saved as originally
approved, the City staff may require a new landscape plan generated by the petitioner and
submitted for the review and approval by City Council.
r
June 20, 1996
RESOLUTION 28, 1996
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, ASSIGNING
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ZONING TO
PROPERTY KNOWN AS DAMERAU OFFICE PARK
AND APPROVING DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY
CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANS SUBMITTED.
WHEREAS, the City has received an application seeking to assign a Planned Unit
Development zoning to the subject property; and
WHEREAS, the proposed zoning and the development of the property consistent with the
plans submitted would be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, hereby approves
a Planned Unit Development (PUD) known as Damerau Office Park.
SECTION 2. Said development chail be constructed in accordance with the following plans
on file with the City's Planning and Zoning Department:
1. June 10, 1996 Site Plan by Urban Design Studio. 1 Sheet.
2. June 10, 1996 Landscape Plan by Urban Design Studio. 1 Sheet.
3. June 10, 1996 Phase One Preliminary Landscape Plan by Urban Design Studio. 1 Sheet
4. June 5, 1996 Details and Specifications by Urban Design Studio. 1 Sheet.
5. Building Elevations of Medical Office Building for Dr. Mark Damerau prepared by
unknown and received by City on May 5, 1995. 1 Sheet.
6. October 6, 1995 Detail and Section drawing by Land Design South. 1 Sheet.
7. June 20, 1996 Proposed Tenant Signage by Urban Design Studio. 1 Sheet.
SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens hereby grants the
following waivers:
1. The number and size of required loading spaces.
2. Minimum landscape requirement for each parcel.
3. The 15 ft. minimum, 25 ft. average upland buffer from the wetland and barrier.
SECTION 4. The planned unit development is approved subject to the following
conditions:
ti
I
The theme of the development shall be for each building to be constructed to resemble
a residential unit in accordance with the design guidelines attached hereto as Exhibit
..A„
2. Each parcel shall return to the City for approval of the architectural, foundation
landscaping, site irrigation and site improvements by the Site Plan and Appearance
Review Committee, except for Lot 4 which is approved with this petition.
3. A permit or a binding wetland determination shall be obtained from FDEP prior to the
issuance of the first building permit for the project (SFWMD Dredge and Fill Permit
and/or ERP's Wetland Delineation).
4. A waiver of the 15 -foot minimurn, 25 -foot average upland buffer from the wetland and
barrier, as described in City Environmental Consultant James Schnelle's March 15,
1996, letter attached hereto, is granted pending apermit for a binding wetland
determination from FDEP, provided to the City regarding the wetland delineation
boundaries and the use of a structural barrier in lieu of an upland buffer to prevent
impacts to the wetlands.,
5. The minimum 15 -foot right -of -way (R.O.W.) Landscape buffer/natural area within Lots
2, 3, and 4 shall be dedicated as an easement to the Property Owner's Association
(P.O.A.). If the mangrove area is removed, all or in part, the R.O.W. buffer plan, as
depicted on the approved landscape plan, shall be installed by the P.O.A. within 60 days
of a City request.
6. The mangrove trees shall be maintained in a natural condition and shape. The
mangroves shall not be hatracked or reduced in height even though it may be permitted
by State codes.
7. If the foundation of a building is less than 15 feet from the top of the bank, the
construction drawings shall show how the top of the bank will be permanently secured
and not subject to erosion or other physical modifications.
8. The delineation and use of the Shared Access Easements shall be shown and described
on a Record Plat of the subdivision, and the safe corner at the northeast comer of the
property shall be dedicated to Palm Beach County, prior to the issuance of the first
building permit.
9. A sidewalk is not required to be constructed adjacent to this property on Prosperity
Farms Road and RCA Boulevard. In lieu of constructing a sidewalk, funds in the
amount of $6,664.00 shall be provided by the developer to the City to be utilized for
pedestrian pathways elsewhere in the City. These funds shall be provided to the City
prior to the issuance of the first building permit.
10. Easements and Property Owners documents shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Attorney prior to the issuance of a building permit.
11. The Property Owner's Association shall be responsible for the landscape maintenance
within the entire Planned Unit Development, including but not limited to, any
undeveloped area prior to development.
12. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the existing building on site
shall be demolished.
13. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, all prohibited (invasive
exotic) plants shall be removed from the entire Planned Unit Development.
14. Prior to any land alterations, the City shall be in receipt of all applicable environment
permits for the relocation of the entrance road and demolition of the existing access
road. The City shall review and approve the mitigation/restoration plan for compliance
to City Codes. The City may require mitigation/restoration for the purposes of
screening the site as referenced on the approved landscape plan.
4.
15. Tenant Identification ground signs shall be prohibited in the subject Planned Unit
Development and the Detail and Section drawing dated October 6, 1995 shall be
amended to delete this detail.
16. A covenant QhA1 be recorded prior to the first building permit with the property
documents to run with the land which provides that all properties whether professional
office buildings or medical office buildings shall meet City parking requirements.
17. Petitioner shall amend the site plan within 30 days of approval to demonstrate
compliance with Items 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, and 7 as referenced in the June 13th memorandum
from Lynette Lanning.
18. The June 20, 1996 proposed tenant signage plan prepared by Urban Design Studio shall
be amended within 30 days to show no more than three (3) signs per building.
SECTION 5. The Planned Unit Development shall have the recordation of all plat(s) and the
installation of all infrastructure and common landscaping prior to December 31, 1997.
SECTION 6. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS Y F 19 6.
6 1 Rt. RU§SO', MAYOR
ATTEST:
LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND
ST-JF!Ff1QENC Y.
OMAS J. B , C ORNEY
VOTE:
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN MONROE
COUNCILMAN JABLIN
COUNCILMAN CLARK
AYE NAY ABSENT
v
vr-
RESOLUTION 14,1998
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE DAMERAU
OFFICE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW FOR
A TIME EXTENSION OF TWO YEARS TO CONSTRUCT
33,300 SQUARE FEET; PROVIDING FOR A CONDITION OF
APPROVAL; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens originally approved the
Damerau Office Planned Unit Development by Resolution 28, 1997;
WHEREAS, the City has received a petition to amend Resolution 28, 1996 to allow for a
further time extension for the construction of 33,300 square feet of office space;
WHEREAS, the City's Planning and Zoning staff has reviewed the petition and determined
that it is sufficient; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed petition is consistent with
the City's Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens hereby approves a time
extension for two years for the development of the Damerau office planned unit development, and
amends Section 5 of Resolution 28, 1996, as follows (new text underlined, deleted text str=k):
"The Planned Unit Development shall have the recordation of all plat(s) and the
installation of all infrastructure rior to December 31, 1997
1999." COOP -'-fl %o-U- L, Ar &o-r fa ` u, i55 of S7 rs4, C O
Section 2. Said time extension is approved subject to the following condition:
(1) Within thirty (30) days of approval of this resolution, the petitioner shall submit a
landscape plan showing adequate tree preservation which meets the approval of
the City Forester.
Section 3. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF FEBRUARY 1998.
JOSEPH RUSSO, MAYOR COUNCILWOMAN LINDA MONROE
VICE MAYOR LAUREN FURTADO COUNCILMAN ERIC JABLIN
ATTEST:
LINDA V. KOSIER,CMC,CITY CLERK
BY:
COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND
SUFFICIENCY.
CITY ATTORNEY
VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN MONROE
COUNCILMAN JABLIN
COUNCILMAN CLARK
\eat
p1anningAshortr- 1\mis9727.res
Resolution 14, 1998
Page 2
February 13, 1998
RESOLUTION 16, 1998
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE
APPOINTMENT OF FOUR (5) REGULAR MEMBERS AND
THE APPOINTMENT OF TWO. (3) ALTERNATE MEMBERS
TO THE EDUCATION ADVISORY BOARD OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Section 2 -132 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances provides for
the appointment of members to the City of Palm Beach Gardens Education Advisory Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Pursuant to Section 2 -132 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances, Ron
Sadaka and Dr. Alan Sara and are hereby reappointed as regular members of the Education
Advisory Board, for terms that shall expire on February 15, 2000.
Section 2. Pursuant to Section 2 -132 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances,
Monika Adams is hereby appointed as a regular member of the Education Advisory Board to fill
the unexpired term of Stasia Datchko, which term shall expire on April 20, 1999.
Section 3. Pursuant to Section 2 -132 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances, Jan
Porter is hereby appointed as a regular member of the Education Advisory Board to fill the
unexpired term of Dr. Caroline Amazon, which term shall expire on August 7, 1999.
Section 4. Pursuant to Section 2 -132 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances,
Nona Helsel is hereby appointed as a regular member of the Education Advisory Board to fill the
unexpired term of Abraham Toubail, which term shall expire on August 7, 1999.
RESOLUTION 16, 1998
Page 2
Section 5. Pursuant to Section 2 -132 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances,
Murtaza Kakli is hereby appointed as an alternate member of the Education Advisory Board to fill
the unexpired term of Bernard Levine, which term shall expire on October 9, 1999.
Section 6. Pursuant to Section 2 -132 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances,
Anne S. Berg is hereby appointed as an alternate member of the Education Advisory Board to fill
the unexpired term of Brenda Martin, which term shall expire on October 9, 1999.
Section 7. Pursuant to Section 2 -132 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances,
is hereby appointed as an alternate member of the Education Advisory
Board to fill the unexpired term of Nona Helsel, which term shall expire on October 9, 1999.
Section 8. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF FEBRUARY 1998.
ATTEST:
LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK
VOTE:
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN MONROE
COUNCILMAN JABLIN
COUNCILMAN CLARK
JOSEPH R. RUSSO, MAYOR
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
AND SUFFICIENCY
CITY ATTORNEY
AYE NAY ABSENT
CURRENT MEMBERS
EDUCATION ADVISORY BOARD
(15 Members - 2 Year Terms)
(4 Alternates - 2 Year Terms)
TERM
MEMBERS TERM EXPIRES
Ron Sadaka (2 yrs) 2/15/98
edu- bd.mem
01/21/98
2/15/98
2/1/99
2/1/99
2/1/99
DATE
APPOINTED
2/15/96
Appt. 9/4/97 (Alt.)
Appt. 12/4/97
11/3/94
4/3/97 reap.
11/3/94
4/3/97 reap.
11/3/94
4/3/97 reap.
4/20/99, 4/20/95
Reappt. 5/29/96
Reappt. 9 /4/97
4/20/99 4/20/95
Reappt. 5/29/96
Reappt. 9/4/97
4/20/99 Appt. 2/15/96
Reappt. 5 /29/97
Reappt. 9 /4/97
2200 -B Vision Drive 33418
Home: 624 -9911
Work: 833 -9100
Dr. Alan Sara
(2 yrs)
34 Rabbits Run 33418
Home: 627 -0961
Work: 694 -7245
Alan Adams
(2 yrs)
9614 Cypress Street 33410
Home: 626 -0911
Fax: 626 -8256
Mary Y. Inglis
(2 yrs)
320 Riverside Drive 33410
Home: 627 -7570
Work: 795 -4921
Lisa Ridgely
(2 yrs)
11030 Oak Way Circle 33410
Home: 627 -5579
Scott Blake
(2 yrs)
1915 19th Lane 33418
Home: 694-9938
Work: 694 -7300
Stasia Datchko
(2 yrs)
22 Dunbar Road 33418
Home: 627 -5746
Wayne Anderson
(2 yrs)
10240 Allamanda Circle 33410
Home: 626 -9225
Work: 881 -8050
edu- bd.mem
01/21/98
2/15/98
2/1/99
2/1/99
2/1/99
DATE
APPOINTED
2/15/96
Appt. 9/4/97 (Alt.)
Appt. 12/4/97
11/3/94
4/3/97 reap.
11/3/94
4/3/97 reap.
11/3/94
4/3/97 reap.
4/20/99, 4/20/95
Reappt. 5/29/96
Reappt. 9 /4/97
4/20/99 4/20/95
Reappt. 5/29/96
Reappt. 9/4/97
4/20/99 Appt. 2/15/96
Reappt. 5 /29/97
Reappt. 9 /4/97
Vacant, Alternate (2 yrs)
Nona Helsel, Alternate (2 yrs)
105 1st Lane 33418
Home: 626 -4513
Student Coalition
edu- bd.mem
01/21/98
8/7/99
8/7/99
8/7/99
8/7/99
11/3/99
11/3/99
10/9/99
10/9/99
10/9/99
10/9/99
Appt. 9/4/97
Appt. 9/4/97
Appt. 9/4/97
Appt. 12/4/97
Appt. 12/4/97
Appt. 12/4/97
Appt. 12/4/97
Appt. 12/4/97
Appt. 12/4/97
Dr. Caroline Amazon
(2 yrs)
One Bermuda Lake Dr., 33418
/(NE1�
Home: 691 -4435
Work: 691 -4435
Deborah A. Martel
(2 yrs)
202 Canterbury Drive 33418
Home: 625 -9991
Abraham Toubail
(2 yrs)
�lGAX,b
4361 Linden Avenue 33410
Home: 622 -7303
Work: 689 -0043
Leslie Miller
(2 yrs)
10252 Hunt Club Lane 33418
Home: 775 -1799
Work: 640 -5086
Karen Robinson
(2 yrs)
807 Windermere Way 33418
Home: 624 -4215
Work: 624 -6015
Dr. Ilene Gerber
(2 yrs)
3674 Dijon Way 33410
Home: 624 -9494
Bernard Levine, Alternate
(2 yrs)
% S�L�D
247 Coral Cay Terrace 33418
Home: 626 -9391
Tesula Stewart, Alternate
(2 yrs)
17 Via Aurelia 33418
Home: 627 -4865
Work: 838 -2363
Vacant, Alternate (2 yrs)
Nona Helsel, Alternate (2 yrs)
105 1st Lane 33418
Home: 626 -4513
Student Coalition
edu- bd.mem
01/21/98
8/7/99
8/7/99
8/7/99
8/7/99
11/3/99
11/3/99
10/9/99
10/9/99
10/9/99
10/9/99
Appt. 9/4/97
Appt. 9/4/97
Appt. 9/4/97
Appt. 12/4/97
Appt. 12/4/97
Appt. 12/4/97
Appt. 12/4/97
Appt. 12/4/97
Appt. 12/4/97
Wan adama
4 626 -8256
N'! TMtm
fth 98 0 cam, Ft 3VII
811123/98
Call- Li
'04� 1-ird �
AO
010:15 AM D212
January 11, 1998
City of Palm Beach Gardens
Education Advisory Board
10500 N. Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 -4698
Attention: Alan Adams, Chairman
Dear Mr. Adams:
Due to being out of town over the holidays, I have not had
the opportunity to contact the board regarding my
appointment as an alternate to the Education,Advisory Board.
Due to my recent appointment to the DATA Advisory Board, I
will not be able to provide the time that your organization
would require thus, I must decline this appointment.
Thank you for this consideration and good luck in your
future endeavors.
Sincerely,
Brenda Martin
10142 Aspen Way
Palm Beach Gardens, Fl. 33410
Y'1
R e��'
Revised: 01/21/98
EDUCATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE APPLICANTS
APPLICATION
DATE APPLIED EXPIRATION DATE APPLICANT
12/15/96 12/15/98 Arline Weiner
12/16/96 12/16/98
12/18/96 12/18/98
12/20/96 12/20/98
12/21/96 12/21/98
1/6/97 1/6/99
10/9/97 10/9/99
10/13/97 10/13/99
10/17/97 10/17/99
375 Kelsey Park Drive 33410
Home: 775 -3291
Ivan Oneill
2514 25th Lane 33418
Home: 691 -9230
Work: 561- 863 -0431
Baqir Murtaza Syed, M.D.
148 Oakwood Lane 33410
Home: 776 -0010
Work: 626 -7606
Andrew A. Pecoraro
2007 Bedford Drive 33403
Home: 625 -0665
Judith M. Hanrahan
40 Edinburgh Drive 33418
Home: 627 -1546
Work: 775 -7226
Dr. Sandra J. McNeal
10687 Hidden Lake Circle 33418
Home: 627 -7935
Marcy Tucker
1714 17th Lane 33410
Home: 627 -1150
Work: 694 -7300 Ext. 8758
J. Burke Culler, Jr.
814 8th Court 33410
Home: 627 -9332
Work: 832 -2238
Joseph M. Zelinske
114 11th Terrace 33418
Home: 622 -3607
10/27/97
10/28/97
10/28/97
11/7/97
11/15/97
11/17/97
11/23/97
11/24/97
12/1/97
edu- app.lst
page 3
EDUCATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
STUDENT APPLICANTS
10/27/99
Derrick Furtado (Student)
4318 Crestdale Street 33410
Home: 622 -3924
10/28/97
Lauren Elizabeth Baer (Student)
2 Carrick Road 33418
Home: 625 -3434 or 622 -5161
10/28/99
Kara Neimark (Student)
16 Surrey Road 33418
Home: 625 -4060
11/7/99
Adam D. Allgood (Student)
2252 Quail Ridge North 33418
Home: 627 -7748
11/15/99
Daniel Simon (Student)
3337 Pine Hill Trail 33418
Home: 626 -8531
11/17/99
Rachel C. Jablin (Student)
184 Thornton Drive 33418
Home: 627 -4947
11/23/99
Jordan Evert (Student)
151 Thornton Drive 33418
Home: 624 -3671
Work: 379 -4469
11/24/99
Michael P. Machtinger (Student)
2101 Canterbury Drive 33418
Home: 625 -3138
12/1/99
John Joseph DeCaro (Student)
11743 Hemlock Street 33410
Home: 627 -6167
10/20/97 10/20/99
11/14/97 11/14/99
11/18/97 11/18/99
2/10/98 2/10/2000
1
Murtaza Kakli
5270 Travelers Way 33418
Home: 622 -5031
Work -
Anne S. Berg, Ph.D.
931 Augusta Pointe Drive 33418
Home: 622 -6827
Julie Rosow
9043 Cypress Hollow Drive 33418
Home: 694 -7593
Work: 627 -7797
George E. Mastics, Jr.
10109 Hunt Club Lane 33418
Home: 624 -6147
Work: 286 -5212
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Date: 2119/98
Subject/Agenda Item
Resolution 17, 1998 - Appointing Election Officials
Recommendation /Motion:
Approval of Resolution 17, 1998
Reviewed by:
Originating Dept:
Costs: $ N/A
Council Action:
City Attorney
City Clerk
Total
[ ] Approved
Finance
$
[ ] Approved w/ conditions
Current FY
ACM
[ ] Denied
Advertised:
Human Res.
Funding Source:
[ j Continued to:
Attachments:
Other
Date: N/A
[ ] Operating
Paper: N/A
[ ] Other
I
S otted y� :4
[ ] Not Required
e artment Directto`rr
Affected parties
[ ] Notified
Budget Acct #::
[ ] None
Approved by:
City Manager
[ ] Not required
BACKGROUND:
Per the City Charter the City Council must appoint officials to work the precincts for an election when the County does
not have an issue on the ballot at the same time. The City now has 18 precincts and they must be staffed according to
the number of registered voters in that precinct. Staff recommends approval of Resolution 19, 1998.
RESOLUTION 17, 1998
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, APPOINTING THE
ELECTION OFFICIALS FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION TO
BE HELD IN THE CITY ON TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 1998,
AND FOR THE RUN OFF ELECTION ON MARCH 24, 1998, IF
SAME SHALL BE NECESSARY; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH
GARDENS, FLORIDA:
$FECTION 1. The following Clerks, Inspectors and Deputies are hereby designated and
appointed by the City Council for the purpose of conducting the General Election to be held in
the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, on Tuesday, March 10, 1998:
PRECINCT 31
CLERK
Cecile Champagne
ASSISTANT CLERK
Teresa Herbert
DEPUTY
Christy Gurto
INSPECTORS
David Haas
Geraldine Stanco
Jacquelyn Bryant
Anna Dedominicis
PRECINCT 31 A
CLERK
Doris Gormley
ASSISTANT CLERK
Evelyn Anderson
DEPUTY
Charles Gruber
INSPECTORS
Margaret Cannon
Dorothy Hibbert
Pauline Hrehovick
Jeanette Wright
RESOLUTION 17, 1998
PAGE 2 OF 5
CLERK
DEPUTY
INSPECTORS
CLERK
DEPUTY
INSPECTORS
CLERK
ASSISTANT CLERK
DEPUTY
INSPECTORS
CLERK
DEPUTY
INSPECTORS
CLERK
ASSISTANT CLERK
DEPUTY
INSPECTORS
PRECINCT 31 B
Richard Campion
Ernest Volonte
Donovon Carr
Thomas Jeffrey
PRECINCT 31C & 3 I
Bette Levine
George Wright
Phyllis Mumford
Mary Day
Rose Cullen
PRECINCT 3 1 D
Eleanor Sirkis
Priscilla Salmon
Harvey Stern
Marion Volonte
Barbara Sager
Elsie Austin
PRECINCT 3 1 E
Joseph Sirkis
Philip Incao
Barbara Patti
Kai Henriksen
PRECINCT 42
Arliss Heath
Jane Scheer
Arthur Burley
Jane Willey
Julia Hydro
Joyce Wilson
Anna Saalbach
RESOLUTION 17, 1998
PAGE 3 OF 5
CLERK James Gallaher
DEPUTY TO BE SHARED WITH DEPUTY FROM PRECINCT 42
INSPECTORS Lucy Uzzi
Sevgin McAuley
Elinor Fisher
CLERK
ASSISTANT CLERK
DEPUTY
INSPECTORS
CLERK
ASSISTANT CLERK
DEPUTY
INSPECTORS
CLERK
ASSISTANT CLERK
DEPUTY
INSPECTORS
.. ,
Claudia Bestland
Annette Courtemanche
Paul Biadasz
Theresa M. Biadasz
Edna Olsen
Lawrence Har ehausen
Janice Anderson
PRECINCT 45A
Sally Truesdale
Barbara Thompson
Mary Ann Mondello
Claire Price Groff
Mary Brauch
Mildred Ruth
PRECINCT 47
Rita Simcich
Dorothy Gallaher
Lee Hubbard
Jean Jamison
Doris Light
Joanne Solarek
Joan Edelman
RESOLUTION 17, 1998
PAGE 4 OF 5
PRECINCT 47A
CLERK
Jeanne Larsen
ASSISTANT CLERK
Janet Maynard
DEPUTY
Julia England
INSPECTORS
Patricia Friedberg
Grace Leabu
Edna Braider
Leona Grant
PRECINCT 47B & 3Ili
CLERK Frank Allemana
DEPUTY Milton Bigham
INSPECTORS Bette Bigham
Marion Little
Phyllis Leddy
PRECINCT 47C & 31 G
CLERK
Gus Constantine
ASSISTANT CLERK
Rose Robideau
DEPUTY
Richard Gottlieb
INSPECTORS
Beverly Gottlieb
Betsey Yerry
Catherine Constantine
Mary Ruth Chilstrom
PRECINCT 47D
CLERK Margaret Witherow
DEPUTY William Roche
INSPECTORS Sylvia Surowitz
Raffaela Pennacchia
Lois Roche
SECTION 2. In the event no candidate shall receive a majority of the votes cast in said
General Election, a run -off election shall be held on March 24, 1998, and the above officials be
and they are hereby designated and appointed by the City Council for said run -off election if such
RESOLUTION 17, 1998
PAGE 5 OF 5
becomes necessary.
SECTION 3. In the event any of the above pollworkers cannot work at either the March
10, 1998, election or the March 24, 1998, run -off election, another qualified pollworker shall be
appointed by the City Clerk.
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1998.
MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO
ATTEST:
LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND
SUFFICIENCY.
CITY ATTORNEY
VOTE: AYE NAY
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR FURTADO
COUNCILWOMAN MONROE
COUNCILMAN JABLIN
COUNCILMAN CLARK
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Meeting Date: February 19, 1998
SUbject/Agenda Item:
Transmittal Hearing - Comprehensive Plan EAR -Based Amendments
Recommendation /Motion:
Staff recommends approval of the Transmittal of the proposed changes to DCA.
Reviewed by:
Originating Dept:
Costs: $ 0
Council Action:
n
Total
y(n
city m
Attoe �NI�A I
planning &Zoning Div.
[ ]Approved
Finance
$ 0
( ] Approved w/ cmdftm
Fire
Current FY
Police
[ ] Denied
Pks & Rec
Funding ource:
g
[ ]Continued to:
Advertised:
ACM
Attachments:
Human Res. N/A
Date: 2/12/98
[ ] Operating
Ordinance 4, 1998
Other N/A
Paper: Palm Beach Post
[ ]Other N/A
Proposed Elements and
(] Not Required
Support Documents
Submitted by:
'l
Growth g . Director
-Affected parties
[ x ] Notified:
Budget Acct #:
[ ] None
Approved by:
MacArthur Foundation
CPARC
IPARC
City Manager
[ ] Not required
BACKGROUND:
Attached are the EAR -based Amendments which staff has been workshopping with the
Council the past few months. The proposed changes reflect the Evaluation and Appraisal
Report recommendations, 'vision' ideals, and input from the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment Review Committee.
Staff would like to point out the following changes which 1) have been made since a
workshop, or 2) are significant changes from the current Plan provisions.
Future Land Use Maq - 2015
Map changes include:
• designation of Frenchman's Forest ecosite with Conservation land use
(a change from RL land use to CON land use on +157 acres)
• designation of Loxahatchee Slough ecosite with Conservation land use
(a-change from RR10, RR20, RL, CR, VLR, and IND land uses to CON land use
on ±5,410 acres)
• designation of Lilac Street park with Recreation and Open Space land use
(a change from RM land use to ROS land use on +10 acres)
• designation of 'HillTop' acquisition with Public land use
(a change from RM land use to P land use on +6 acres)
• correction of a scrivener's error on the Nativity Lutheran Church property
(a change from C land use to RM land use on +2.5 acres)
• depiction of existing I -95 /Donald Ross Road interchange
• elimination of the PDA Land Use Overlay
Future Land Use Element
Policy 1.1.1.3 and MXD definition (p. 1-4) have been revised to provide density /intensity
thresholds per 9J -5 and to require residential as a component of any Mixed Use project.
Please note that it is proposed that any neighborhood commercial use include
residential above the ground floor.
Policy 1.1.5.1.(a).2 has been revised to reduce the minimum size threshold from 250
acres to 90 acres to provide an incentive for the unincorporated properties along
Northlake to annex into the City and develop per City regulations.
Policy 1.1.5.2.(a) has been revised to eliminate a minimum size threshold east of the
Turnpike.
Policy 1.1.5.4.(a) and PDA Land Use Overlay definition (p. 1 -6) have been revised to
eliminate the PDA Overlay. The PDA zoning district is maintained and affected
properties are still required rezoning to PCD or PUD. Staff feels that the growth
management strategy that was promoted by the PDA Overlay is no longer needed due
to the Urban Growth Boundary, dual level of service standards and existing PDA
zoning.
Policy 1.1.5.4.(b) has been added to designate an Urban Growth Boundary.
Transportation Element
Map O has been prepared to provide a conceptual thoroughfare plan for new local
roads in the vacant areas of the City.
Housino Element
Objective 3.1.6 and the related policies provide new policy for addressing affordable
housing needs. Tables 4 -15 through 4 -18 in the support document summarize the
Shimberg Center data which we are required to utilize.
Infrastructure Element
Level of service standards for water and sewer have been revised to reflect SUA's
actual demand /usage levels (revised per SUA recommendation).
Recreation Element
The level of service standard is revised. This does not reflect the 'vision' standards, but
is an increase over the current standard.
Intergovernmental Coordination
Objective 8.1.5 and the related policies have been added to address the 'vision'
strategies for quality education.
Staff has reviewed the County Education Element and feels that our Future Land Use
and Intergovernmental Coordination Elements provide similar policies. School
concurrency is not a component of the County's Element, nor our Plan.
Public Safety
Policy 10.1.2.1. has been revised to promote LOS on a district basis versus citywide
basis.
Caoital Improvernents
Policy 9.1.4.2.(a) has been revised to establish dual level of service standards for the
'urban' and 'rural' areas.
Policy 9.1.4.2.(b) has been reviewed by Growth Management staff and the City
Attorney to evaluate its effectiveness. It has modified since the workshop.
Policy 9.1.4.6 has been discussed further with Kent Olson. Staff recommends the
proposed policy as it had been presented to you.
January 23, 1998
ORDINANCE 4, 1998
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR
AMENDMENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS AS SET FORTH IN
EXHIBIT "A "; PROVIDING FOR TRANSMITTAL AND FOR
CODIFICATION IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; AND,
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has adopted an Evaluation and Appraisal Report pursuant to
Chapter 163.3191(1) which was found to be 'sufficient' by the Department of Community
Affairs;
WHEREAS, the City has adopted a community 'vision' of the future encouraged by
Chapter 163.3167(11);
WHEREAS, resident and public input has. been received! through a Comprehensive
Plan Amendment Review Committee and public meetings;
WHEREAS, proposed text and land use amendments have been prepared pursuant
to the Evaluation and Appraisal Report, 'vision' and public input and have been reviewed
by City Staff who have determined that they meet all criteria set forth by §163.3187, Fla.
Stat. (1996 Supp.); and
WHEREAS, the City Council is the duly constituted land planning agency for the City
which, after public hearing, has recommended the proposed text and land use
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan of the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The Comprehensive Plan of the City is hereby amended as set forth
in Exhibit "A ".
Section 2. The City Growth Management Director is hereby directed to ensure
that this ordinance and all other necessary documents are transmitted to the Florida
Department of Community Affairs and, together with the City Clerk, to ensure that this
ordinance is codified as part of the Comprehensive Plan of the City.
Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective upon adoption, provided that the
subject comprehensive plan amendments shall become effective in accordance with
§163.3189(2), Fla. Stat. (1996 Supp.).
PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS DAY OF
PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS DAY OF
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF
JOSEPH R. RUSSO, MAYOR
LAUREN FURTADO, VICE MAYOR
1998.
'1998.
'1998.
LINDA MONROE, COUNCIL MEMBER
ERIC JABLIN, COUNCIL MEMBER
DAVID CLARK, COUNCIL MEMBER
ATTEST:
LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK
1"
VOTE:
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR FURTADO
COUNCIL MEMBER MONROE
COUNCIL MEMBER JABLIN
COUNCIL MEMBER CLARK
g:longrange /ord.earamendmts
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
AND SUFFICIENCY:
CITY ATTORNEY
AYE NAY ABSENT
EXHIBIT "A"
Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Palm Beach Gardens are depicted on the
following pages in JL►l11V i. -%-jug and underline All maps have been revised/updated with
`best available' data.
Changes to the Future Land Use Map 2011 'V 2015 include:
• designation of Frenchman's Forest ecosite with Conservation land use
(a change from RL land use to CON land use on +157 acres)
• designation of Loxahatchee Slough ecosite with Conservation land use
(a change from RR10, RR20, RL, CR, VLR, and IND land uses to CON land use on +_5,410
acres)
• designation of Lilac Street park with Recreation and Open Space land use
(a change from RM land use to ROS land use on +10 acres)
• designation of `HillTop' acquisition with Public land use
(a change from RM land use to P land use on ±6 acres)
• correction of a scrivenor's error on the Nativity Lutheran Church property
• (a change from C land use to RM land use on ±2.5 acres)
• depiction of existing I- 95/Donald Ross Road interchange
• elimination of the PDA Land Use Overlay
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Date: March 5, 1998
Subject/Agenda Item
Consideration of approval for petition SP- 97 -17, a request by Henry Skokowski, agent for Northcorp
Development Inc., for site plan approval of a 40,000 square foot office building located on lot 3
within Northcorp Planned Community District (PCD). The 3.08 acre site is located at the northwest
corner of Burns Road and Riverside Drive. (7- 42S -43E)
Recommendation /Motion:
Staff recommends that Resolution , 1998 be approved with 2 conditions.
Reviewed by:
Originating Dept:
Costs: $
Council Action:
Total
City Attorney
Growth Management
[ ]
Finance NA
$
[ ] Approved Wl condefans
ACM
Current FY
[ J Denied
Human Res. NA
Other NA
Funding Source:
[ } Continued to.
Advertised:
Attachments:
Date:
[ ] Operating
Paper:
[ ] Other
Resolution , 1998
[ x ] Not Required
Site Plan
t
Submitted by:
Growth Management Director
Affected parties
[ ] Notified
Budget Acct. #::
[ ] None
Approved by:
City Manager
[ x ] Not required
BACKGROUND:
Lot 3, South Park Center is located within Northcorp Planned Community District. The Northcorp
PCD is bounded to the north by RCA Boulevard, to the south by Burns Road to the east by FEC
Railway and to the west by Interstate 95.
On September 21, 1989, City Council approved the plats for "The Northcorp Center" and "The RCA
Boulevard Center", by Resolution 82, 1989 and Resolution 83, 1989. On January 18, 1990, City
1
Council approved the plat known as "West Park Center" by Resolution 1, 1990 and the plat known
as "South Park Center" by Resolution 2, 1990. Also on January 18, 1990, Ordinance 1, 1990 was
adopted by the City Council approving the Northcorp Planned Community District.
The petitioner is proposing a 40,000 square foot 2 -story office building on lot 3, within the South
Park center of Northcorp Planned Community District.
The proposed 2 -story building will be 35 feet in height. The building materials are stucco and pre-
cast concrete and the proposed colors are "Mushroom Cream" for the stucco and " Sour Cream"
for the pre -cast concrete.
The project is proposed to be completed in a single phase. In accordance with Condition 22 of
Ordinance 1, 1990, the petitioner has provided a trip generation study considering all other existing
and proposed development to assure that the PCD will not exceed 6063 daily trips. Condition 22(IV)
also requires all parcels within the Plat of South Park Center to provide a signal warrant study to
determine if signalization is required at the intersection of Burns Road with Riverside DriveMest
Park Drive. The study has been provided by the petitioner and reviewed by the Traffic Engineer.
The petitioner has indicated that in an effort to preserve as many trees as possible, and provide
sufficient number of parking spaces, the parking stall size is being proposed to be reduced to
9'x18.5', a waiver of the requirement regarding the dimensions of parking stalls has been requested
by the applicant. The petitioner is also requesting for a waiver of the requirement pertaining to the
number of loading spaces. Code requires 2 loading spaces for this project, whereas, due to the
nature of deliveries expected at the office building and the applicant's desire to preserve trees, the
proposed site plan provides for only 1 space at 12'x35'. However, the City Engineer supports the
City's LDR requirements pertaining to the number of loading zones. Assistant City Engineer Tammy
Jacobs has reviewed the petition and has suggested modification of the entrance to include a 3'
wide concrete bull nose extending approximately 42' from the curbed entrance island to prevent left
turns by the incoming vehicles. However, the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee,
agreed that the petitioner's proposal for the entrance is satisfactory.
Access to the site will be from Riverside Drive. A project identification sign has been proposed at
the entrance to the site. Building Official Jack Hanson has reviewed the plans and has indicated
that the sign must be brought further to the south in order to comply with the 50' side yard setback.
The petitioner has requested for a waiver of the sign side setback requirement. Building Official
Jack Hanson has no objections to the request for a waiver of setback requirement for ground signs.
The petitioner has also requested a waiver to allow six (6) messages on both sign faces of the
ground sign.
Building Official Hanson is recommending denial of the waiver request to allow six messages. Mr.
Hanson has indicated that the signs can be placed on the building. Building Official Hanson has
reviewed the wall signs and recommended approval. The petitioner had originally requested for a
waiver, however, Mr. Hanson has noted that the wall sign is in compliance with the code.
At its January 27, 1998 meeting, the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee voted
unanimously (7 -0) to recommend approval of petition SP -97 -17 with the following conditions:
Prior to scheduling this petition for a City Council meeting, the traffic warrant study will need
0)
to be submitted by the petitioner and reviewed and approved by the City.
2. The approval of this petition is contingent with the approval of the following waivers:
a. Waiver of the requirement pertaining to the number of loading spaces (Sec. 118 -569).
b. Waiver of the requirement pertaining to the dimensions of the parking stalls (Sec. 118 -
475a.).
c. Waiver of the requirement pertaining to the side setback for the signs (Sec. 1 10-36c) and
maximum message allowed on ground signs (Sec. 1 10-2e).
3. The applicant is required to meet the "Undeveloped Lot Drainage Standards" prepared by
Keshavarz & Associates and accepted by the City Engineer.
All those wishing to address the City Council need to complete the necessary form (supply located in back
of Council Chambers) and submit same to the City Clerk prior to the meeting being called to order.
LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
FEBRUARY 19, 1998
7:30 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
II. ROLL CALL: Mayor Russo, Vice Mayor Furtado, Councilwoman Monroe, Councilman
Jablin, Councilman Clark
III. PUBLIC HEARING:
1. Public Hearing, Adv. 2/12/98, Providing for a Recommendation to the City Council for EAR -
Based Amendments.
IV. ADJOURNMENT:
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
FEBRUARY 19, 1998
7:30 P.M.
Subsequent to the Adjournment of the Local Planning Agency
I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
II. ROLL CALL: Mayor Russo, Vice Mayor Furtado, Councilwoman Monroe, Councilman
Jablin, Councilman Clark
III. ANNOUNCEMENTS
Monday, February 23, 1998, Art Advisory Committee
Tuesday, February 24, 1998, Planning and Zoning Commission
Thursday, February 26, 1998, Joint City Council Meeting with the Plannin & Zoning Commission
IV. CITY MANAGER REPORT
V. PRESENTATIONS
1. Presentation of Award for Excellence in Community Public Education Programs by the
Florida Fire Chiefs Association to the Palm Beach Gardens Fire Department.
2. Presentation to Janice Rausch for Service on the Code Enforcement Board from 11/94 to
11/97.
3. Presentation to William Mignogna for Service on the Planning and Zoning Commission
from 9/93 to 11/97.
VI. AWARDING OF BIDS
1. Awarding of RFP for Employee Assistance Program
2. Awarding of Bid to Purchase a Dump Truck for the Public Works Department.
VII. ITEMS BY MAYOR AND COUNCIL
CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 2/19/98
VIII. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC (Please submit request card to Clerk prior to this Item)
IX. CONSENT AGENDA
1. Approval of 1/29/98 City Council Workshop Meeting Minutes.
2. Approval of 1/29/98 Joint Meeting with City of Riviera Beach Minutes.
3. Approval of 2/5/98 Local Planning Agency Minutes.
4. Approval of 2/5/98 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes.
5. Resolution 12, 1998 - Consideration of Approval For an Expression of Opposition to Florida
House Bill 3291.
6. Resolution 15, 1998 - Consideration of Approval Requesting that the Palm Beach County
School Board withhold the Decision to Divest the Responsibility for Post - Secondary Education
and Vocational Training Programs to the Palm Beach Community College.
7. Resolution 18, 1998 - Consideration of Approval Providing for Support of Permanent and
Consistent Funding for Regional Planning Councils.
X. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Consideration of Approval to Submit to Department of Community Affairs the Staff Initiated
EAR- Based Amendments (Public Hearing, Adv. 2/12/98).
Ordinance 1, 1998 - Providing for an Amendment to Section 38 -88, Subparagraph (a) of the
Code, Entitled "Codes and Standards Adopted" of Chapter 38 Entitled
"Fire Prevention and Protection ", to Update References to Standard
Codes (Public Hearing Adv. 2/4/98; Consideration of Second Reading
and Adoption).
Ordinance 2, 1998 - Consideration of Approval Providing for a Waiver to Art in Public Places
for Doubletree Hotel (Public Hearing Adv. 2/4/98; Consideration of
Second Reading and Adoption).
Ordinance 3, 1998 - Consideration of Approval Providing for an Amendment to Division 3 of
Chapter 2 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances Entitled
"Education Advisory Board ", Specifically Section 2 -132 "Composition;
Appointment; Terms ", Section 2 -135 "Duties and
Responsibilities "(Public Hearing Adv. 2/4/98; Consideration of Second
Reading and Adoption).
XI. RESOLUTIONS:
Resolution 2, 1998 - Consideration of Approval of a Site Plan for NorthMil Plaza.
Resolution 13, 1998 - Consideration of Approval Providing for an Amendment to Resolution 86,
1996, Amending the Approved Site Plan for Parcel M -22 of PGA
National Planned Community District, by Modifying Landscaping and
Phasing Plans, Adding Six (6) Parking Spaces, Covering 90 Parking
Spaces, Eliminating the Resident Drop -Off Area at Phase II Building and
Adding Sidewalks; Providing for an Amendment to the Approved Site
Plan for Parcel M -22; and Providing for Additional Conditions of
Approval.
2
City of
Palen Beach Gardens
Comprehensive Plan
Adopted January 4, 1990
Amendment Adopted August 1, 1991
Amendment Adopted September 5, 1991
Amendment Adopted December 5, 1991
Amendment Adopted October 22, 1992
Amendment Adopted December 2, 1993
Amendment Adopted December 2, 1993
Amendment Adopted November 3, 1994
Amendment Adopted October 5, 1995
Amendment Adopted December 7, 1995
Amendment Transmitted February 5, 1998
Amendment Transmitted February 19, 1998
CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ELEMENT
FUTURE LAND USE
Future Land Use Categories
Goals, Objectives and Policies
TRANSPORTATION
HOUSING
INFRASTRUCTURE
Sanitary Sewer
Solid Waste
Stormwater Management
Potable Water
Aquifer Recharge
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
CONSERVATION
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
SECTION
ONE
1 -1
1 -9
TWO
THREE
FOUR
4 -1
4 -2
4 -4
4 -7
4 -10
FIVE
SIX
SEVEN
TABLE OF CONTENTS 12197 i -2
ORD , 1998
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Goals, Objectives and Policies
Capital Improvements Implementation
Monitoring and Evaluation
PUBLIC SAFETY
PROCEDURES FOR ACCOMPLISHING MONITORING
AND EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS
EIGHT
NINE
9 -1
9 -8
9 -17
TEN
ELEVEN
TABLE OF CONTENTS 12197 i -3
ORD , 1998
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
2A Traffic Circulation - Level of Service Standards
213 Generalized Peak Hour Directional Volumes
2C Generalized Two -Way Peak Hour Volumes
2D Maximum Volumes for non -FIRS County
Thoroughfare Roads
2E Maximum Volume for City Roads
2F Radius of Development Influence
9A Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements
12A Proposed Thoroughfare Roads
PAGE
2 -3
2 -4
2 -5
2 -6
2 -7
2 -8
9 -12
Following Map O
TABLE OF CONTENTS 12197 i -4
ORD , 1998
MAP
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
FUTURE LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION MAP SERIFS
Future Land Use Map 2015
Waterwells and Cones of Influence
Analysis of Land for Development Suitability
Emergent Wetlands
Flood Zones
Coastal Areas
General Ecological Communities
Wildlife Observations
Conceptual Linkage Plan
Potential Future Annexation
Projected 2015 Traffic, LOS & Proposed Laneage
Existing Traffic Circulation
Regional Roadway Network
Mass Transit with Trip Generators & Attractors
Conceptual Thoroughfare Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS 12197 i -5
FOLLOWING
PAGE
11 -2
page intentionally left blank for insertion. of Adoption Ordinance
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1210 i -6
FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT
Future Land Use Categories
Future land use for Palm Beach Gardens is depicted using a total of 15 -+3 land use categories
including general land uses and recommended improvements associated with specific land uses.
Map +--3 A presents future land uses for Palm Beach Gardens. The map provides for the projected
land use needs to the year 2015 2010.
The Future Land Use Map represents a 2015 '21'010 land use scenario. The map designates an
urban growth boundary, u lrban land uses are designated to the east of this boundary for all areas
that are not environmentally sensitive. Western lands are designated with rural or low intensity
land uses. The primary reason for this was to provide a long -term positive and realistic
expectation of LLLL_aLU_i V L1c__1LL ____ :- 1-- 117.aL 11 _ . � L_ _
uJG LLl L11L. <.LLy. . ♦1' LLLL an ai G0.J di- aignaLGLL, JGL Y L"a %,an LJI. IJL V Y LU%.0 LLI
an orderly service provision €ashien, concurrent with the impact of development.
The following is a description of Future Land Use Categories. These categories are further
explained and supplemented by the goals, objectives, and policies of this element.
Rural Residential (RR10 and RR20): Lying outside of the eastern, compact, Urban
service area, vacant properties have been designated with one of two rural sub - categories:
Rural Residential 10: one dwelling unit per ten acres
Rural Residential 20: one dwelling unit per twenty acres
Rural areas that are extremely wet are designated Rural Residential 20 to protect the wetland
values. The intent of the rural residential designations is to provide low intensity development in
these areas while encouraging more intense, compact growth in the eastern areas and to prevent
urban sprawl.
In the Rural Residential sub - categories, limited agricultural uses are expected to co -exist with
residential uses. Agricultural uses permitted within the Rural Residential category must be
compatible with the environmental characteristics and natural resources, as well as with the
lifestyle and quality of life of the residents.
Residential Very Low (RVL): The RVL category allows predominantly single family detached
residential development up to 1.0 unit per gross acre. The RVL category is also allows clustered
developments which preserve vast amounts of open space and natural resources. Thus, large,
planned community areas are permitted within this district even if they contain several types of
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -1
EAR -based Amendment
development so long as the overall gross density of the development is consistent with that
permitted under the RVL category.
Residential Low (RL): The RL category allows predominantly single family detached residential
development up to 4.0 units per gross acre. The RL category is intended to accommodate
.developments comparable to PGA National, Steeplechase, and the older residential parts of the
City. Thus, large, planned community areas are permitted within this district even if they contain
several types of development as long as the overall _gross density of the development is consistent
with that permitted under the RL category.
Residential Medium (RM): The RM category is primarily located along the western side of
Central Boulevard between PGA Boulevard and Hood Road, and along the I -95 corridor between
PGA Boulevard and Northlake Boulevard. Maximum density permitted within the RM category
is 7.0 dwelling units per gross acre. Again, planned community areas may contain residential
developments of higher net densities so long as the overall density of the area is consistent with
the RM category.
Residential High (RH): Property designated RH is intended to assist the private sector in
providing affordable housing in Palm Beach Gardens. It allows up to 10.0 dwelling units per
gross acre and is primarily located adjacent to major employment areas or contiguous to major
arterials which may accommodate mass transit facilities in the future.
Mobile Home (MIT): The City has not proposed any new mobile home sites on the Future Land
Use Map; however, mobile homes parks are a permissible use in mixed use districts. The existing
mobile home park located at the northwest corner of PGA Boulevard and Prosperity Farms Road
is shown on the Future Land Use Map as a mobile home land use. Maximum density permitted
in the MH designation is 7.0 mobile homes per gross acre. Individual mobile homes and
manufactured homes are permitted on lots in all residential categories - see Policy 3 ,1, 3.8,
Commercial (C): They C designation is intended to accommodate a wide range of retail and
general commercial uses. It is a site - specific designation that depicts existing commercial uses and
proposes future commercial areas at primary intersections. The specific regulations and uses
associated with development within the areas designated C will be determined during the zoning
of the properties. Commercial land use activities will be limited in intensity to a maximum lot
coverage of 35 % of the site and a maximum building height of 50 feet. The land development
regulations may further restrict intensities.
Professional /Office (PO): Property designated PO is for future or existing business and office
centers. The PO category was included in the plan to distinguish office uses from more intensive
commercial uses such as retail. Professional Office land use activities will be limited in intensity
to a maximum lot coverage of 35% of the site and a maximum building height of 36 feet. The
land development regulations may further restrict intensities.
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -2
EAR -based Amendment
Industrial (I): Future industrial development is designated north of PGA Boulevard between I -95
and Alternate AlA, and south of PGA Boulevard near the Beeline Highway in the western part
of the City. Property designated I is to be used in an industrial park arrangement. Development
of such areas will promote a well landscaped environment with internal circulation and buffering
from existing and future surrounding land uses. Industrial land use activities will be limited in
intensity to a maximum lot coverage of 607o of the site and a maximum building height of 50 feet.
The land development regulations may further restrict. intensities,
Public /Institutional (P): The P land use category designates existing and proposed public and
institutional facilities such as schools, libraries, fire stations and government offices. These uses
shall ha-vc a 1110.AU11u111 uleasity- be limited in intensity to a maximum lot coverage of 40% of the
site and a maximum building heiLyht of 50 feet .85 F.A..R.. Among the sites designated are the
existing City Hall at the intersection of Military Trail and Burns Road, existing school sites, and
the Palm Beach Community College and North County Courthouse on PGA Boulevard. Public
and institutional uses are allowed in all land use categories subject to limitations and locational
criteria identified in this Plan and /or outlined in the Palm Beach Gardens Zoning code. These uses
will be delineated on the Future Land Use Map at the next subsequent amendment process.
Public /institutional uses will be approved as conditional uses pursuant to the Palm Beach Gardens
Zoning Code if the specific rules and locational criteria governing individual conditional uses are
complied with. Certain intensive public /institutional uses will not be allowed in residential areas,
such as land fills, airports and wastewater treatment plants.
Recreation /Open Space (ROS): The ROS category is 111t1d1U4U t0 designates public parks and
recreation complexes, and protected open spaces. These activities will be limited in intensity to a,
maximum lot coverage of 407o of the site and a maximum building height of 45 feet. The land
development regulations may further restrict intensities,
Commercial Recreation (CR): The CR designation has been provided to reflect and
accommodate major public and private commercial recreation facilities that meet a portion of the
recreational needs of residents and tourists. Many of these facilities were conceived as profit -
making enterprises and /or are in private ownership. Uses permitted within this category include
golf courses, outdoor and indoor recreational facilities such as tennis clubs, amusement and sport
centers, outdoor amphitheaters, hunting and gun clubs, and outdoor wildlife attractions.
Commercial recreation uses shall be approved and developed as a Planned Community District or
Planned Unit Development. Maximum intensities shall be consistent with the final development
plan,
Conservation (CONS): The Conservation designation applies to areas identified as
environmentally sensitive or environmentally significant which have been set aside as protected
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -3
EAR -based Amendment
preserves. Limited development, such as passive recreation or ecotourism activities are permitted
TL_ : -, a _'C '1__ _.1__:��_a: _.� : 'L_a _ a,. /Y!\ATV
within this category. 111, 111LG11L Vl Lll, L1GJ1g11aLivu 1J LV G11Ju1G LuaL al--- LL,Jls11alGLL \ IJlTJ a1G
Yii�vi v,u vl u,v,lvY,u 111 a 111aiu1,1 ulaL io 1%13Yv1131vi, LV vu -OILV c1Jviiviuil%u%a1 ivuaiialilts.
___:aL:� ____ /41 -%WT1' _L_11 _1 _ .]: F 1 /�
LJGVGIV�./lll,lll W1L11111 a1,aJ u,J1r1laLGU VVl \J Jllall 11V1 ,A,G,U a u,11Jliy Vl 1.V uw,uulg UIIJLL Pct
28- aeees. Any development that does occur should preserve environmentally sensitive areas by
clustering development as appropriate.
Golf (G): The G category portrays areas specifically intended or used for golf courses. This
designation can include public and private golf courses.
Mixed Use Development (1!EXD): The MXD designation is designed for new development which
is stirrannded characterized by a variety of existing integrated land use types. The intent of the
district is to provide for a mixture of uses on single, large parcels in order to develop sites which
are sensitive to the surrounding uses, desired character of the community, and the capacity of
public facilities to service proposed developments. This future .land use designation is also
intended to foster infill and redevelopment efforts. deter urban sprawl -and encourage new
affordable housinLy opportunities, as well as lessen the need for additional vehicular trips through,
the internalization of trips within a neighborhood or project, To create a functioning. multi-
faceted type of development. mixed use development is dependent on the successful integration
of distinct uses. Integration is defined as the combination of distinct uses on a single site where
impacts from differing uses are mitigated through site design techniques. and where impacts from
differing uses are expected to benefit from the close immediate proximity complementary uses.
All reauests for development approval based on a mixed use concept must be able to demonstrate
functional horizontal integration of the allowable uses, and where applicable, vertical integration
as well. The following are the minimum criteria to be used for development of sites designated as
MXD:
1. An MXD shall be developed as a Planned Community District or a Planned Unit
Development. However, land development regulations adopted to implement this
Comprehensive Plan shall 11A-11LULL1 a maintain mixed -use supplemental regulations 2tg
distriet to provide further criteria for the development of sites with MXD Future Land Use
designations. including parking rea_uirements, permitted, uses, setbacks and other
considerations.
2. MXDs shall have frontage on at least one arterial. The City's Conceptual Thoroughfare
Plan shall be accommodated to expand the roadway network through the provision of new
local streets which serve new neighborhoods in the City's develonin_e areas. and shall be
JU11VU-'_1_' L__ W _ L__ •� 1_ 3 __ _ [T_L:___1__ _. 1_.._7 �„
11U,LL V.' lllvl, wan Vll, ,A10 Llllb' lallu u5%, Ly ,. v v m%._ulal a„GJJ lV lV,al JLi GGW
L_11 ._. L_ _a L _— _:a.... :aL -- XXX7T%
JUall 11VL V, j1G11111LL,U 11 V111 J1L,J W 1L11 all 1v1A1L1 LLGJ1r,11a LW11.
3. MXDs shall include a minimum of three (3 two (2) of the other Future Land Use
Categories described in this element. Residential must be one of these uses. No single use
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -4
EAR -based Amendment
may comprise more than 60% of the area. Recognizing that mixed use projects have
varving characteristics intensity measures are indicated below which provide flexibility
in terms of minimum and maximum land allocations. However, The City Council may
waive this the maximum nonresidential height limit for employment center buildings
located at the intersection of two arterials, p,vviaiva upvu a I inuilig llai Llll, o tii
7►dVTI J'_a�..a _� L_ W_a L,. .].__._1 L 1 0_1
1Y1L11J uis Liil.< %,au VV 111L,L uy a ubVbiVIJi11bi1L Wlul 11.,55 ulaii LLUCC kJ) USV i.'IJ4J. 3U%.11
f _� _�_ _1___.rli_a_.1 __ 1�RVJ'
L,AL,G�J L1V115 llia�' 111L,luuL, a Siiirlt, V Wilt,l/ VL,L,ulJallL VL all Giilll LV uL,5l�lla LL,u as lv1l11J.
General Mixed Use Future Land Use Category Intensitv Measures
Land Use
Land Allocation
Lot Coverage
Height
Open Space
Min 15%
Neighborhood
Min 2%
Max 70%
Min 2 Fl
Commercial
Max 30%
Max 4 Fl
Residential High
Min 20%
Max 50%
Min 2 Fl
Max 60%
Max 4 Fl
Residential Low
Min 0%
Max 50%
Max 2.5 Fl
Max 60%
Employment Center
Min 2%
Max 70%
Max 4 Fl
Max 30%
Special Definitions:
Neighborhood Commercial land shall be used for community- serving retail, service, office
and business uses. At least 25% of the net building area shall be designated for residential
use and shall be located above the ground floor.
i Residential High land shall have a maximum density of 15 units /acre.
Employment Center land shall be used for corporate offices, light industry, hotels,
warehousing, and similar uses. Employment Center lots shall generally be grouped together.
4. The individual uses, buildings and /or Bdevelopments pods within MXD districts shall
include interconnecting pedestrianways and plazas and shall provide connections to the
Parkwav Svstem, Nonresidential uses shall have an internalized relationship with the
residential component and multi -modal accessibility.
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -5
EAR -based Amendment
Density Reduction Land Use Overlay: A portion of the area commonly referred to as TAZ 848,
generally located north of PGA Boulevard, east of the Loxahatchee Slough and west of the SUA
wastewater treatment plant, is the subject of a land use overlay. The density within this Overlay
is reduced by fifty percent from the underlying land use designation's potential density. This
density reduction is necessitated by the environmental constraints of the property and potential
roadway capacity deficiencies. The result of the density reduction is a gross density potential of
two dwelling units per acre. Development within the Overlay shall be concentrated to the least
sensitive areas and shall be supported by public facilities. No bonus density is applicable in this
Overlay area. While a variety of uses and use densities /intensities may be approved as part of a
residential PCD, the overall impact of the density/intensity shall not exceed that generated by a
gross density of two dwelling units per acre. Other requirements and regulations of the Palm
Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances and Comprehensive Plan are applicable where not in conflict
with the provisions of this Overlay.
Tl__��_J !
A -_- /TT\ 1 \ T -_JI TL._. \____l -___ All
1 h1��LGLL iJGVG1Vil111GI1L LylGa �1 "tlkj LallU VJG %lVGllay• All Ul1LLGVG1V1JGU 11V1YGV11JG1 VQL1V11 1Qi�u
• L_ __ -_. -r A1I______ A 1 A 1L rT1/� A T)___1 _____� �� _r .L_ T) __l.__ TL'.`L__.____ 1
lll U1G Ql G0. WGJL Vl L711,111Q LG L- 11L"1, "ULU1 VL 1 VC111vU1GValu, anu GQJL' VL Li1G 17L.G1ll1G 111611Way, anu
1L F
111 AT l_l_l__ T__- 7__ -_-a a r aL_ TT._L___ - -. Lll, al,a 1VIU1 Vl livulGValu, WGJL Vl L11G 11161WQy
0.11U W,JL Vl L11G
T _� _J L
LVLLQlla LG11,G olvur11, wima1 11avG 11V a,L1VG U, VG1V�7111G111 VLUGl vt VLll,i V,JLGU JLaLuJ 6lal1LGL1 Vy
L_ _ 7'%_1- T___L i`I____L J__:a _] aL .. TllJ Tlt A /T1T1 A \ T - -A TT
UQ1G L.1Ly Vl 1 Qll11 1JGQG11 %- Ou11Ly 1J u%,a L6L1aLGU aJ U1G 1 lawn u LJGVGIVPIII% IIL L"11G0. `i 1JL7f L0.11u VsG
Overlay.
NIT' I--*- aL_ ___1L -- _ -__ aL_ 1lTl A T -J TT__ 1__ _11 aL_� 1 A
VV 1111111 L11G ui Vail al,a, L t%, i11r1 Lailll VJG lJVGllay Jllall aFpty lV all FLV�JG1 LLiVJ 111LJiG Mall 1V aci7es
_Lu %, _ _ IIi i J__._l -�W _��
111 51z- anu Jllall VG l,6al LL,u QJ a 11Vlulllb' LV11G u11L11. U,VGIV�J111G11L VL u1L, JQ1U ta11UJ 1J 1,LiuGJLGu
aL_ /"1Ia__t_ !�_�_��_L _�_____ Tll_r TL_ /l___�l�_. L_11 L_ 7_-_ - -a_J L-_ L_ Tl7% A
Plu1Ju0.11L LV Lll, C-ItC J \.,Vlll�Jt G11G11J1VG 1 tall. 111, VvGllay Jllall V, impiG111,11L%,u Vy Ll1G 111!1
LVlllil� LL1J Ll iGt.
L_ Tl71 A _ J:_a _*_ aL_ _ _L_11 _7J_ 1_ r_W.1__
1116 1JG11111LL,u LLJGJ U11U,1 L11G 1I1L"1 L.Vlllilr, U1J L11GL 111 L11G u1Va11 alca Jllall 111,iuIdi, Jw6i%,- iamIIy
_J_� -__ aL_ J_�_• r _ J__._77'�� __ _� /1 /�\ .
1GJ1LLG11G,J
at u1G U,11Jlly Vi VILG UW,lIIIIr, WILL F%,L lGll `1Vf m-a Ga, puV11G 1/atl\J anu il,l,iiaiivll
r....:L•�S__ _n _:_J_�__IL_1 LLuL 1 .] LIL _L__�_L __ __L-_/_
1aG111L1GJ, a11LL QJ GV11u111V110.1 UJGJ 0.r11GLL11Ut a1 0.11LL ll1J L1LUL1V11Q1 LLJ,J JLL,11 aJ ,11U1 G11GJ, J,11VV1J and
1- ----1 ___ 1_77 _7__J_ ----I- r_�:1_. _:J _a
1116 JKLL1V11J. 1 G11111LLGU LiJGJ 111 Lit, !plat a1Ga Jllall 111,1UUG Jl riI,-1Q11111Y 1,J1UG11 „J
at a uG11J1Ly
_' L aL_ T' T J TT__
GV11JIJ LG11L WIM U1G l ULUI, lianu UJ, w- air.lIQUVIl j1 uu/ 1V aG Vl 1 uU /Z.Va, /, aK11,u1LUIG and IJUV11%.
A
JQ1,LV , L_17 L_ I _ J 1 G _ iV
11 1aG1111J. AY11GU1LUIG UJGJ Jllall 11VL VG JGL111LLGU 111 ,11VUVi1111,i1L0.11y -JG1111VC Va
_L:- aL_ 1NTl A -�__ J__a�: _a _L_11 L_ 1___a_� -J
Ql G0.J. l.lG V G1V�J111G111 W 1LLllli L11G i I1L'1 GVLLLL1r, U1JUlGL Jllall UG GILLJLGI,LL a W ay L1 V111 G11V It V11111,11Lally
• L_..
JG11J 111vG a1G0.J
anu. 1i1 1116 Ul Vall. aiGa, Jllall VG alIPPULL%.0 Vy FVLa Ul,_ waL%,l, aaiuialy JGWGL Qllu
- r__•l7a]__ --; -- r__]13a: ,•..
0.U1_%11aLG ivauway 1aGLL1L1,J, JJUL1GG ailu IIIG 1Ga1ruG aGi viGG, auu Fa111J anu 1GG1GQLlv11a1 LaI inuGJ.
ll__a_- a__t__ L_. 11 L_ ___L7L:a_J _ r__ _�JI__. J___1 _'� 1_ r_�:1__ ��,_:.]_�_ -,. TT__.. ]� �L .. v._�
UGFLIG Lalll\il J110.11 VG iJ1V111V1LGLL G11,GiJl 1V1 111LL1vtuUal Jlllb'1,- tallllly 1GJ1U%, ,%,a UJGJ 111 L11G lUlal
1-all :aL L_ J..�a_J 1,. -.,,1 r __ _ -J--A
a1Ga J11Q11 1G,G1 VG JGt VI„J GV11J1JLG11L WIL11 L11G auv17L%,u i,vG1 VL 3%,A V1GG JLailuaiuJ
TL_ __'J .]:..- _.__,.,J
1116 JQ1LL JJl V�JGL LI,J play VG U, VGIV1JGLL, Vu1G1 Ulall aJ 1n%,vxVLLJly ulJGUJJGU, Vllly ai LGl a L,GVlllll�',
appro_J L__ /"�_�_ /'•- __�__1 Tl_�__J !'7_W �___�_ T\__a -__a _� 7l1_��,�A TT_]a
v,u by %-JLLy VVUil,ll, lV a r1a1111GLL L,Vi11111u111Ly LJ1Ju 1GL Vl 1 lalul,u V111L 1JG VG1V�J111,11L. 111E
_L_11 ____:J__ aL_ r_11 ___.'__ __,a____ __.L_. �___. ____: TlilTl - -J TITTTI
l...lLy 1.,VLL11Gil 31142111- V11J1uG1 U1%, 1V11VW111r, G111Gl1a W11,111Gv1,W111r, 11.11 anu A V11 1GLiLLGJL0 �WILIIIII
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -6
EAR -based Amendment
L - TT A T __a TT__
u1G 1 1Jl1 Lauu V JG %a V Gl lay .
0....._1 -_�__a 1_.
v 111E iGL.VlluIr,, anu JuVJGLjuG11L LLGVGIV�J111GI11, Jllall vl.lrui villy w11G11 ulG JG1viGGJ aLILI
__ - 0.L- ]_a_ _. C ___ L 0.__._7_.______ __.,/1 L_ 1___
laL.L11L1w 11000JJaly LU auYYviL L11G LILLGLIJIL.' Vl JUGll LLG VGLV�J111G111 W111 UG ill FMCC GVIIGUL1GLll
0. 0._
,w! L L
1uL L11G uilpaCto Vl L11G uGVG1VjJLUGLIL;
J
1-- -'" -1- --- -L-11 _ _"' -
V 1116 IGGVLLIIIE_ III 1116 ul Vall alga, Jllall 161!1 GJGllI 1116 JJIL)rLGJJ1vG GApa11J1V11 Vl LILG GA13Lll16
_ _ _ TT - _- -1-.c* _all UG GV11J1JLG1lL W 1LLI LIIG V 1 Vall Vl V W Lll LJVullualy kJGG LLGLIILUIV11 LVG- 17 V - - W -- h LLL00._ 1 Ql Ga 0.1 14 JLa_11 ___- \.
TL_ ___ -• _L_11 _ __ -_ 1__- t __ 0.____1 -_�_ -a ___L._L L_.
V 1116 1 GL.Viunr, Jllall 11V L 1J1 VL11V LG 1Ga1J -lt Vr, UG V G1VFIII;,11L, W 111611 VGGUA J W llklil 11%.,W
0. ___1_ - -__- _.a_0. C ___ -- _ L .__ _ /___ 0._r -70.]_- L_7 __
LIGVGLV1J111Gl11 1J JLLGLL away 110111 all GAiJL111r, ulvall JGl V1GG aitia IJGG uG111L1L1V11 UGIV JV },
7------ -'-� -� - - - -- _7_ 1___a_a 7 -� _7 ____ a L_
Uy1J0.JJ111� vaG0.111 1!0.1 GGLJ 1VGalGLL 111 VL G1VJGl LV u1G UL Vall JGL V1GG aiGa;
T -_ 1_ -0._ 1___ _a __ -C1k A10._ -,- A 1 A L CTIn A .__0. a _
V 1 V1 lama 1VGaLGu WGJL VL Lvlllllaly ball A1LGLuaLG L"11l1, 1101111 Vl 1 VL7 tJVulGValu a11U Gast
C T}1_�_0._1_ T____.71._ 11 _ _a 0.__._1_ - -__ -a __ L7- Tlf�Tl _ TTTTI a L___
Vt 1'1Vllua J lULL11JiK%,, an FLV1JVJGVI U$- VG1V1J111G11L W1111111 a 1 VlJ Vi 1 Vl-, L11UJL Lia a
_C Cn
uliiluuuui ai4%,, vt ✓v w -i%,o,
T__ 1_ -0._ 1___x_0. _ C T`1_�70...1_ T__- - -71__ _ -0. - _0.L _C nf' A T7 ___1 ---__a _al -C
V 1 V1 lands 1VGaLGLL WGJL 01 1 "lvilua J 1L11111Jm -k, anu nui Lu Vl 1 VLl 1JVu1Gvaiu, Vl JVLLLit VL
"t/ A T7___1_____0. a C L_ T
1 VL'L 1JV UIG 00.1u QLiu WGJL Vl LL1G LVAauaLG11GG J1Vur11, all LLGV%,ivjj i%,nL Jllall 1LIG1ULIG a
C,1CA _ __ __.L__L _1_11 L_ ___a 'n-1T%
1111UMIUtll Vi bJv aGi GJ WL11G11 Jllall UG 1GGV11GLL LV 11.1!.
A 11 -� -_ a 0.____1_ -�,_- _L_11 L_ C _L _�__a__ 7_0._ ♦ L 0.L_ t___L _ -f 1�_�_lf
lJ All UlV VVJGLL UGVG1V1J111G11L Jllall UG vi %,naiaGLG1 GV11313LG11L W1L11 L11G .u1Va11 Vl iuial
_0.7_ -_ a_L1._L_0. L_. 0.L_ TT -L_- /_____0.L n__0. /T1 -77 1 1 G A /L\
ulJ 1111GLIVLIJ GJLa U11J11Gu uy UIG uivau V1vwL11 LJVullual y %r v11Gy 1.1.J.`1'.S V J�.
T- __.]_.� a_ 0.7___ 1__- r___ 0._____1_- __._ -a I l!0._. /- 1_- - - -71 _L_11 _
111 V1LLGL LV u1JGVuia6G 1GaF -11V� LLGVG1V1J111G11L, %.1Ly %_vuu%, l Jllall LIVL GV11J1L %,l 1GGV1LtIIrp UILIGJJ
L:_ _ L_1C 71_ C 0.1_ : 0.7 L _- _ TL_ _ __L_r
ULG JuUJGGI 1J1 V1JGL ly LJ W illllll viii--hall 1i111G it L11G GAlaLlil6 ulvall a1Ga.. 111%. GAiatiur, ulvall area
L_71 _ •a - -0.7_1 L:_ L_ /"'a__ ___L__L L_,. - �L _C C!V
sliall VG uGiui%,u aJ a 1GJl%1G11LLa1 ai Ga W1U1i11 UK, %_Ay WL11G111LaJ a hill unulll 1nLL11UG1 Vl -,v uwCulllg
' 7aL ___ __� 0._ -_70. C _ _0. /_� -� -_ __7 0.___0._7_1 _ 0.•a_ 0.• 1
Li111LJ W lul a wini111LL111 LLG1131Ly VI V11G U111L Fv-L aG1G a11V1/ 01 GV11L111G1G1a1, lllULLJLllal V1 1110L1LULLVL1al
C 1 nn nnn _ _ C_ _a
Ju u\,iui \,a iu l,A\,Ga3 vl 1vv,VVV Jlivai{, 1%,%,L. --
TL_ ___a ___- C___LL'_ C___1_a___ 7- _ _� __ ---A T.T%A _1_/1 L_ _ 70.L 0.L_ TT_L_-
1116 GALG11J1V11 VL 1/40116 10.G111L1GJ tutu a1G0.J GV11Gu 1 iJL7 Jllall VG Gv11310LG11L W 1L11 1116 V 1 vall ,jl V W }.11
n___ -J____ ___7- -
ilVU11u0.1 V. 11L0.A1111iGG 1116 uJG Vl GA1JLillb' 1aG111L1GJ allu JGl V1GGJ� G11GV Ula�G \,vlilFa%,i U Uall
UGVGIV1J1L1GLIL MILL u1JGVULar,G u1G 1J1vI11Glauvu Vl ulvall opiaw1. 1116 1JUU11% :iaGlLll1GJ anu UL111uGJ
.-L-11 L_ 1 --- 0._0. 'a_ - ____.�•_._ 0.L_ ____ __a _CG _'_ -___ _C _____•___ - __._70._0. - _:_:�: 70._ ___a_ __ 1
Jllall VG lVG0.LGV1 LV 11MAL1111L,G LILL, LLJG al1LL GILLL,1G11Gy Vt JG1 V LGGJ 1J1 V V 1%J%,U, 11111MULGG ILO GVJLJ anu
• 0.L_ __ __/ _ a
MUILu11iGG iW LuiFa\,ia vii L11G llaiuial GilV11VILlIIVIlL.
VULG1 1G%juu-_ 11G1AJ anu LGrula LLvLLJ. Vl L11G I aun tjGa%,u %jalui no %-vuG Vl %_numa11GGJ aliu
<,V11L1J1 G11L,11J1_VG l Ian at,-, a1J1J1LG0.UiG Wll%.1G 1LVL 111 GV111111r1 wL u1G 1JLVv1JLV11J Vi u11J VVGllay.
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -7
EAR -based Amendment
In addition to presenting the Future Land use categories described above, the Future Land Use
i c i--i -1 ticii transportation components. The Transportation Tra€fr
Map also includes two tia e
Chien Element of this Comprehensive Plan provides further details on these components.
Interchange (o): The Future Land Use Map designates seven eight interchanges within the City.
l vui
_ Five of the interchanges shown on the map are existing: I -95 and Northlake Boulevard; I -95
and PGA Boulevard; I -95 and Military Trail: I -95 and Donald Ross Road; and the Turnpike and
PGA Boulevard. The PGA Boulevard and Alternate AlA urban interchange is currently under
design and is programmed by FDOT for construction in 2000/2001, Three Two future
interchanges shown for I -95 and Central Boulevard, PGA DucLLlcvaru alnu AIA, and Northlake
Boulevard and the Turnpike will not be needed within the first five -year planning timeframe.
However, they are designated in order to anticipate their right -of -way requirements construction
and to recognize their potential impact on surrounding future land uses.
Parkway (0000): The Parkway designation is shown along some of the major arterials within
the City. The intent of the Parkway designation is to identify and preserve a corridor of between
300 and 400 feet within which the arterial roadway can occur along with bikeways, pedestrian
paths, native vegetative greenwa_ys, linear parks, and landscaping. The parkway cross - section will
provide an aesthetically pleasing buffer between highly traveled arterials and surrounding
residential areas. as well as a safe byway for alternative modes of transportation. The Parkway
System has been designated as an urban component of the Florida Greenway_ System. It is described
in more detail in the Conservation and Transportation Elements
One major objective of designating Parkways is to eliminate the perceived need of using strip
commercial as a buffer between arterials and residential areas. Therefore, the Parkway concept
is integrated into the philosophy of designating commercial and employment areas at intersections
or "nodes ", eliminating the need for strip commercial use.
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -8
EAR -based Amendment
Goals. Obiectives and Policies
GOAL 1.1.: CONTINUE TO ENSURE A HIGH QUALITY LIVING ENVIRONMENT
THROUGH A MIXTURE OF LAND USES THAT WILL MAXIMIZE PALM BEACH
GARDENS' NATURAL AND MANMADE RESOURCES WHILE MINIMIZING ANY
THREAT TO THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF THE CITY'S CITIZENS
THAT IS CAUSED BY INCOMPATIBLE LAND USES AND ENVIRONMENTAL
DEGRADATION.
Objective 1.1.1.: 1i --- ".Y V.I. The City shall continue to
111 Q�.�,Vl UQ11�.G W 1{.11 JG�.61V11 Ile -It fi, 1' l7•, '
maintain re v:u- -viv-, aiu 1 _ c _ -v 1J.0 _v_r_lLlcl _ c _, land development regulations to manage future
growth and development in a manner that provides needed facilities and services, protects
environmental resources, and discourages the proliferation of urban sprawl.
Policy 1.1.1.1.: The City shall c v �c w , aiiu i c v 1;%, w uci c iiccc „al y , continue to maintain land
development regulations to ensure that they contain specific and detailed provisions intended to
implement the adopted Comprehensive Plan, and which as a minimum:
a. Regulate the subdivision of land;
b. Regulate the use of land and water consistent with this element and ensure the compatibility
of adjacent land uses and provide for open space;
C.. Protect areas designated Conservation on the Future Land Use Map and further described
in the Conservation, Coastal Management, and Recreation and Open Space Elements of
this Comprehensive Plan;
d. Minimize the impacts of land use on water quality and quantity and regulate development
which has a potential to contaminate water, soil, or crops;
e. Regulate areas subject to seasonal and periodic flooding and provide for drainage and
stormwater management consistent with the Infrastructure Element of this Comprehensive
Plan;
f. Protect potable water wellfields and aquifer recharge areas;
g. Regulate .signage;
h. Ensure safe and convenient on -site traffic flow and vehicle parking needs;
i. Discourage urban sprawl through the following strategies:
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -9
EAR -based Amendment
�l) establishing moderate densities and varied housing opportunities in urban areas
0 mixed -use and clustering requirements
(3) promoting urban infill development and redevelopment
(4) locational requirements
(5) establishing an urban growth boundary and distinct urban and rural service areas
(6) directing public investment to existing urban areas, and
(7) annexation and extraterritorial planning agreements.
j. Require landscape buffers and gardens using predominately native species and other
appearance measures to maintain a high visual quality;
k. Provide that development orders and permits shall not be issued which result in a
reduction of the levels of service for the affected public facilities below the level of service
standards adopted in this Comprehensive Plan; and
Provide for the assessment of impact fees or dedication of land and facilities to off -set costs
assumed by the City or other governniental agencies for the provision of facilities or
services required by new development.
m. Cooperate with Seacoast Utility Authority through cooperation on the Seacoast Utility
Board to insure the maximum utilization of their water and wastewater transport plan so
as to implement the economic expansion of facilities within definitive service boundaries.
Policy 1.1.1.2.: The City shall rc;ik_w, an" %,vi;� wi %,1 ii ccssaiy, maintain land development
regulations which permit residential development only at densities equal to or less than the
following:
a. Rural Residential 20 (RR20) - up to a maximum of 0.05 dwelling units per gross acre, or
one unit per twenty acres;
b. Rural Residential 10 (RR10) - up to a maximum of 0.1 dwelling units per gross acre, or
one unit per ten acres;
C. Residential Very Low (RVL) - up to a maximum of 1.0 dwelling units per gross acre;
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -10
EAR -based Amendment
d. Residential Low (RL) - up to a maximum of 4.0 dwelling units per gross acre;
e. Residential Medium (RM) - up to a maximum of 7.0 dwelling units per gross acre;
f. Residential High (RH) - up to a maximum of 10.0 dwelling units per gross acre; and
g. Mobile Home (MH) -. up to a maximum of 7.0 mobile homes per gross acre; and
L ^ -_ - - -- /'007.7''
11. <,V11aG1 VaL1V11 `\.l fl\vf - up LV a 111aii1111U111 VI 1.V UWGlllll6 u111L jJGl L.V.V &1VJa aG1G3.
T_1!.___ 1 1 1 IN L_
1 V11GJ' 1.1.1.lr.U. 111E 1G31LL%,IlUa1 lams uJG F-la1Vlla Vl u1G 1olNLV G0.LGrviy GCa1611amu vll L11G al Ga
vii��iwiuy iCic ii�u iv aJ u1\, -.-vivam Y uliLaty aii, luvunii u uy ul%, U.,11113 vi a vca%u,u rights
i_L-] 1_. aL /� ��� L_� ____ Tl _
0. 1GG111Gl11 L1a'GU July 1, 177J. 111E rvala, VUJGGLlvGa anu �JV11G1Ga Vl u1G \..Vlll�Jl G11G11alvG i Ian, as
17 aL_ - ___-_] __ L'.__Ll_ L_�__ � a 11__. _ _�L L7-,
well as L11G IJlvvlalvila Vl u1G %-vuG Vl %- nul11a11GGJ, alG aj[jjjnGav1G W11G1G 11vL 111 \,viu11GL w1L11 Lllla
agree=' ..
Policy 1.1.13.: The City shall l�vl�w, anu i%viw% wu%ic i1cccssary, maintain land development
regulations which permit a Mixed Use Development (MXD) district which shall implement the
following concepts:
1. An MXD shall be developed as a Planned Community District or a Planned Unit
Development. However, land development regulations adopted to implement this
Comprehensive Plan shall inelude a maintain mixed -use supplemental regulations gyring
distriet to provide further criteria for the development of sites with MXD Future Land Use
designations. includinL- parking rea_uirements, permitted uses, setbacks and other
considerations.
2. MXDs shall have frontage on at least one arterial. The City's Conceptual Thoroughfare
Plan shall be accommodated to expand the roadway network through the provision of new
local streets which serve new neighborhoods in the City's developing areas. and shall be
� vi_ lauIu lauu uaG Lyp%,. v Gun .u_a-.l � a_ GGGaa Lv 1vGa1
ai�a al11 V111udGU ] by m VrG uL0._1a 1_1 __ 1_1 %
1-11 - _.. L_ a_A l _� -_�__ ____aL __ 11,7X771
suail 11VL UL �JL.11111W.0 11Vin siWo Vvlux all 1v1LA11 w air IML1V11.
3. MXDs shall include a minimum of three (3 two (2) of the other Future Land Use
Categories described in this element. Residential must be one of these uses. No single use
may comprise more than 607o of the area. Recognizing that mixed use projects have
varvine characteristics intensity measures are indicated below which provide flexibility
in terms of minimum and maximum land allocations 11 " Cv:,r, t The City Council may
waive ulls the maximum nonresidential heiLyht limit for employment center buildings
located at the intersection of two arterials, yl V V lalvll UF%Jil CL lliuiilr iilaL III'- 111LG11L VL is
*(VT\ -3 '� _ L_ __ L__ __aL 1_ L -- L___ /7\ Cl-. _l 1v1L110 Uist 1Ga
Gall UG 111GL U.' a U%,v%1vjJ111G11L Wlul 1GJa Ulal'1 uu GG lJf uaG Ly F%,a. ou%,,,
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -11
EAR -based Amendment
%ri%C Yiivi-iS iiiay jum auuv a magi%, vwin,li v%,%,uYauL vi an ciaLiii, uwiguau u as 1viAL.
General Mixed Use Future Land Use Category Intensitv Measures
Land Use
Land Allocation
Lot Coverage
Height
OUen Snace
Min 15%
Neighborhood
Min 2%
Max 70%
Min 2 Fl
Commercial
Max 30%
Max 4 Fl
Residential High
Min 20%
Max 50%
Min 2 Fl
Max 60%
Max 4 Fl
Residential Low
Min 0%
Max 50%
Max 2.5 Fl
Max 60%
Employment Center
Min 2%
Max 70%
Max 4 Fl
Max 30%
Special Definitions:
Neighborhood Commercial land shall be used for community- serving retail, service, office
and business uses. At least 25% of the net building area shall,be designated for residential
use and shall be located above the ground floor.
Residential High land shall have a maximum density of 15 units /acre.
Employment Center land shall be used for corporate offices, light industry, hotels
warehousing, and similar uses. Employment Center lots shall generally be grouped together.
4. The individual uses, buildings and /or (developments 'nod$ within MXD districts shall
include interconnecting pedestrianways and plazas and shall provide connections to the
Parkway System. Nonresidential uses shall have an internalized relationship with the.
residential component and multi -modal accessibility.
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -12
EAR -based Amendment
Policv 1.1.1.3.: The City shall encourage `linkages' which connect or gather residents and
business owners of different neighborhoods and promote a sense of community. This shall be
accomplished through 1) implementation of the Conceptual Linkage Plan (Map I) and Parkway
System. as described further in the Conservation and Transportation Elements; 2) connection of
neighborhoods. shopping, schools and parks through an expanded sidewalk /pathway system,
discussed further in the Transportation Element: 3) promotion of `gatherine' (people) places in
new development projects: and 4) installation of entry features alonL- maior arterials, including
sisnaLye. art and landscaping which identify Palm Beach Gardens as a city and community_ .
Policy 1.1.1.4.: The City shall maintain i� vi%�rv, and i��i;� wi �1� , -1 �� „Qiy, land development
regulations which provide for a Planned Community District (PCD) which shall implement the
following concepts:
a. The intent of a Planned Community District (PCD) is to permit a large area to be
developed under one master plan that includes different land use types at several different
levels of intensity. Collector roads and development "pods” are shown as part of the
master development plan. Supporting documentation is also included which describes the
development intensities assigned to each pod and any restrictions in use or site design
requirements. The pods are then developed as individual site plans Planned Unit
b. Although a variety of uses and use intensities may be approved as part of a residential
PCD, the overall density must be consistent with the underlying Future Land Use
designation of the area. For the purposes of this Comprehensive Plan, the City Council
may approve the following bonus densities shah apply to th- i Uiui% T -- A ai��vii��
u25-iiucu YicvivU3iy iii Liia iciii� iii for areas developed as PCDs:
Rural Residential 20 (RR20): Up to 0.05 units per gross acre.
Rural Residential 10 (RR10): Up to 0.1 units per gross acre.
Residential Very Low (RVL): Up to 1.0 units per gross acre.
Residential Low (RL): Up to 5.0 units per gross acre.
Residential Medium (RM): Up to 9.0 units per gross acre.
Residential High (RH): Up to 12.0 units per gross acre.
C. In addition to the above, PCDs with an underlying Future ' Land Use designation of RH
may have densities permitted up to 15.0 units per gross acre, based on one additional unit
of density allowed for every 10% of native ecological habitat put into a preserve within
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -13
EAR -based Amendment.
the PCD up to a maximum of 15.0 units per gross acre. These preserve areas would be
over and above the minimum preservation and open space areas provided in accordance
with standard PCD requirements, and must be incorporated into the Parkway Pedestria
XT
,,aiui% Trailways system.
d. In addition to the above, PCDs with and underlying Future Land Use designation of RH
may have densities permitted up to 15.0 units per gross acre for the provision of affordable
housing, as defined in this Plan, or for an Adult Congregate Living Facility (ACLF),
except in Coastal High Hazard Areas that are the Category 1 Hurricane Evacuation Zones.
L. Through the PCD's flexibility, the City Council may grant waivers to the non - residential
intensities described previously,
L Site plans for pods which are developed within Planned Community Districts shall be
developed according to the densities and intensities assigned to them under the Planned
Community District master plan documentation,
Policy 1.1.1.5.: The City shall r� �� w , diiu r%, v ia%, wlicic, ilczcssa y , maintain land development
regulations which provide for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) technique which shall
implement the following concepts:
a. The intent of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) is to ensure the desired character of the
community is furthered or enhanced on development sites within the City, particularly on
sites where the development proposed is rather intense. Master plans for Planned Unit
Developments include, at a minimum, site plans showing all local roads and landscaping
plans. Supporting documentation is also to be included which indicates, at a minimum,
development phasing and a list of permitted uses for commercial and industrial PUDs.
b. In exchange, for the extra review requirements imposed by the PUD process, developers
may propose plans that would not otherwise be permitted under by -right zoning districts.
These may include a mixture of uses not found within any of the by -right zoning districts
and /or density bonuses and /or waivers to non - residential intensities described previously..
For the purposes of this Comprehensive Plan, the City Council may approve the following
bonus densities aiaii aYYL i iiiy I, .aud TT__ idugviiiS uc�%iiucu Yicvivu�ij ii iia
ele= for areas developed as Planned Unit Developments:
Rural Residential 20 (RR20): Up to 0.05 units per gross acre.
Rural Residential 10 (RR10): Up to 0.1 units per gross acre.
Residential Very Low (RVL): Up to 1.0 units per gross acre.
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -14
EAR -based Amendment
Residential Low (RL): Up to 5.0 units per gross acre.
Residential Medium (RM): Up to 9.0 units per gross acre.
Residential High (RH): Up to 12.0 units per gross acre.
Tl -_� -� TT�:a T1a L'..L �__] a T. -L�: _�
4. 1 10.1ll14LL V 111E 1.J4 V 41V�J111411W W 111411 0.14 L14 V 41Vt/4LL W lUllll 1.10.11114LL L.V111111U111Ly 1.J1JL114L5
1L-11 L._ ------ _ aL .. .]_�_:a. _ ..A a
Snail VG LL4VG1Vp%,u 0.44VLLL111r, LV L114 LL411J1L14J 0.11L1 111L411J1L14J 0.JJ1r114LL L , L114111 U11L141 L114
i laimcd VV111111LL1ll Ly 1J1JL114L 1110.JL41 IJ10.11 UV4UM%,11LQL1V11.
cd. In addition to the above, PUDs with an underlying Future Land Use designation of RH
may have densities permitted up to 15.0 units per gross acre for the provision of affordable
housing, as defined in this Plan, or for an Adult Congregate Living Facility (ACLF),
except in Coastal High Hazard Areas that are the Category 1 Hurricane Evacuation Zones.
Policy 1.1.1.6.: The City shall rc v ic w , aind r: v Esc wh CrC ii����;ary , maintain development
regulations which address the location and extent of non - residential land uses in accordance with
the Future Land Use Map and the policies and descriptions of types, sizes, densities, and
intensities of land uses contained in this element.
Policy 1.1.1.7: The City shall ensure the availability of suitable land for public and institutional
uses (as defined on page 1 -3) necessary to support development by:
L Designating land on the Future Land Use Map for public /institutional use. The City shall
sunnort and facilitate coordination of school planning with the School District of Palm.
Beach County for the location and development of public education facilities. The City
shall identify sufficient land to accommodate Public Educational Facilities as necessary to
serve the current and projected student nonulation. At a minimum. nronosed school sites
shall meet the State Requirements for Educational Facilities (SRFF). plus a ten percent
capacity flexibility allowance, and shall be sized to ' accommodate all needed utilities,
sunmort facilities and adequate buffering of surrounding land uses,
2 Allowing public /institutional uses in certain land use categories subject to limitations and
locational criteria as identified in this Plan. Such locational criteria shall include the
following standards:
(a) Public /Institutional buildings shall be specifically prohibited in areas
designated as Conservation and other environmentally sensitive lands,
including wetlands, 100 -year floodplains, groundwater aquifer recharge
areas, areas set aside by development to meet the 25 percent preservation
of native ecological communities and wildlife habitats. New or Expanded
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -15
EAR -based Amendment
Public /Institutional Facilities shall not be encouraged within the coastal area
and shall meet the requirements of the Coastal Management Element.
(b) Public /Institutional Uses shall be located in areas where there are
adequate transportation facilities to support the proposed use based on the
adopted level of service standard for traffic circulation. Preference shall be
given to the location of such uses and facilities along City collectors and
arterials as may be appropriate.
(c) Public /Institutional Uses shall hac � a i��a- AUHU��� ut,;isity; be limited in
intensity to a maximum lot coverage of 40% of the site and a maximum
buildinLy heiLyht of 50 feel .85 F.A.:.
(d) Schools shall be considered as compatible in areas designated as low
density residential on the Future Land Use Map. Other institutional uses,
such as, libraries, ehoeis, fire stations and government offices. including
educational facilities, shall be considered compatible in medium and high
density residential areas and all non - residential land use categories in which
such uses are not specifically prohibited as cited in this comprehensive plan.
Public /institutional uses may. be permitted within all residential Planned
Unit Developments and Planned Community Districts, subject to master
plan approval and limitations and locational criteria as identified in this
Plan.
(e) Public /Institutional Uses shall be buffered from adjacent land uses and
shall be set back from adjacent roadways. Buffering for noise, odors, glare
and lights shall be provided. Setbacks shall be a minimum of 25 feet in the
front, 15 feet in the sides and rear and buffers shall be a minimum of 5 feet.
Buffers and setbacks may be increased depending on the characteristics of
the proposed public /institutional use. Stadiums. outdoor recreational
facilities and similar support facilities shall be located and buffered on the,
proposed site to minimize impacts on adjacent properties. Communication
towers on school or other public propertv shall be consistent with the siting
and safety criteria contained in the Land Development Regulations and shall
reauire City Council approval,
(f) Landfills, airports, wastewater treatment plants, universities and
regional hospitals shall not be allowed in residential areas and shall require
a comprehensive plan amendment to the Public /Institutional (P) land use
designation prior to zoning and site plan approval.
(g) Public /Institutional sites shall be capable of accommodating adequate
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -16
EAR -based Amendment
parking and onsite traffic circulation requirements to satisfy current and
projected site - generated vehicular demand.
Policy 1.1.1.8.: The City shall evaluate whether its feasible to further 'Laid LLl V\ 1�J1J111G1a
regulatiom L. �_____. ,1 _J��a -� �_•_a a __ L [.. -a_ -� 1L�1 7rf n.1 /�\ T [� _L_1
LV UG 1GVIJGLL Q11LL QLLVIJLGL1 GV11J1JLG11L W1U1 JGGL1V11 1VJ.JG\VG `1 1'.J. J11Q11 simplify and
streamline the existing regulatory programs of the City. and shall continue existing establish a
mechanisms to monitor the effectiveness of the regulatory programs. At a minimum, land
development regulations shall be evaluated every five years. c_ oinciding with the EAR - based
amendments to the comprehensive plan.
Objective 1.1.2.: Development orders and permits for development or redevelopment
activities shall be issued only if the protection of natural resources is ensured and consistent
with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Conservation. Infrastructure and Coastal
Management Elements of this Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 1.1.2.1.: Development activities within areas designated on the Future Land Use Map as
Conservation shall be comparable with the allowable activities for such areas as described in this
element.
Policy 1.1.2.2.: Species of flora and fauna listed in the Conservation and Coastal Elements of this
Comprehensive Plan as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern shall be protected
through the development review and approval process.
Policy 1.1.2.3.: The City shall protect potable water wellfields and prime aquifer recharge areas
through the implementation of the Palm Beach County Wellfield Protection Ordinance.
Policy 1.1.2.4.: Proposals for development within the 100 -year floodplain as identified by the
Federal Emergency Management Agency shall conform with local regulations for development in
such areas.
Policy 1.1.2.5.: The Citv shall maintain stormwater management Development regulations te+e
auVYt:.0 1rV11J1J1G111 ------ 1 ��- W111�3.32�2 kid, . _11- all which require that development is carried
out in a manner that recognizes and preserves the region's natural drainage systems, including the
Loxahatchee Slough and interconnected flow -ways. consistent with South Florida Water
Management District rules and regulations found in Chanter 40E-4. 40E -40. and 40E -400, F.A.C,
Policy 1.1.2.6.: The developer /owner of any site shall be responsible for the management of
run -off consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Stormwater Management
Drainage Sub- Element of this Comprehensive Plan.
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -17
EAR -based Amendment
Policy 1.1.2.7.: - -' - ,tL L_
163 • "An /1 The
1. V11J1JLGllI WlUl L11L, Lll11G:11 Q111Li �J1V VlLLL.LL U�' Utrbl1V11 1VJ.JGVG `1 }, 1 .J. L
City shall adept maintain development regulations containing specific standards and criteria
designed to protect environmentally sensitive lands consistent with the goals, objectives and
policies of the Conservation Element.
Policv 1.1.2.8: The City shall adopt regulations consistent with the Boat Facility Siting Plan for
Palm Beach Countv which restricts m4rine- oriented uses as follows New multi - family projects
with marina facilities and new dry storage facilities are not permitted. The total number of new
wetslips per jurisdiction are limited to a maximum of 50 slips, provided that the local government
has demonstrated a need for additional public access in the comprehensive plan. One additional
single -lane public boat ramp with a limit of 15 parking spaces for vehicles having a trailer may be
permitted per jurisdiction, provided that the local government has demonstrated a need for the
additional public access in its comprehensive plan.
Objective 1.1.3.: Development orders and permits for development and redevelopment
activities shall be issued only in those areas where suitable topography and soil conditions
exist to support such development. .
Policy 1.1.3.1.: All proposed development of other than individual residences shall include a soils
analysis prepared by a professional licensed to prepare such an analysis which shall include the
ability of the soil structure to support the proposed development.
Policy 1.1.3.2.: All proposed development shall be located in a manner such that the natural
topographic features of a site are not adversely altered so as to negatively affect the drainage of
neighboring properties or visual aesthetics of the area.
Objective 1.1.4.: Development orders and permits for development and redevelopment
activities shall be issued only in areas where public facilities necessary to meet level of service
standards (which are adopted as part of the Capital Improvements Element of this
Comprehensive Plan) are available concurrent with the impacts of development.
Policy 1.1.4.1.: Consist cat L aL_ L__ 1L7 '1r1(Y1 /I '% T
t.V11J1J L�..LL vvlul U1L. 11111GLLaRll. Fivvluliu Vy Jtrl.LLVll 1VJ.JL.VL: `1J, 1 .J,L. The City
shall maintain adept development regulations to provide that public facilities and services be
available concurrent with the impacts of development to meet the level of service standards
established in the Capital Improvements Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Concurrence_
Manasement Svstem reauirements shall include the following:
1) Demonstration that the impacts from a proposed development comply with the adopted level
of service standards in the City,
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -18
EAR -based Amendment
2) Determination of concurrency prior to the processing of the application for a development
hermit.
3) Certification of concurrency shall be secured prior to an applicant receiving a development
order. this may be in the form of certificate of exemption, certificate of concurrency reservation,
or certificate of conditional concurrency reservation
4) Certification of concurrency shall be valid for the time set forth -in the development order and
any amendments thereto, otherwise the certificate is valid for two years. If a time extension is not
granted. the concurrency certificate shall automatically expire, and no further development activity
can occur without obtaining an appropriate concurrency certificate.
Policy 1.1.4.2.: Public facilities and utilities shall be located to:
a. Maximize the use and efficiency of services provided;
b. Minimize their costs;
C. Minimize their impacts on the natural environment; and
d. Maximize consistency with the goals, objectives, and policies of this Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 1.1.4.3.: Prior to .major annexation, a facilities and services extension plan shall be
prepared and adopted. This plan shall:
a. Establish the location, level of service standards and phasing for each facility and service
to be extended by the City;
b. Require all development or redevelopment activities to occur in conjunction with the
provision of the community facilities and services without exceeding the level of service
standards established in the Capital Improvements Element of the Plan;
C. In order to encourage infill development and reduce urban sprawl, future annexation
ordinances shall reserve the right of the City to discourage development and redevelopment
activities within proposed future annexation areas until such time as facilities and services
are extended in accordance with the plan, even if facilities and services are offered by a
developer in advance of the plan phasing.
d. A com_rehensive Dlan amendment shall be undertaken by the property owner during the,
City's next round of amendments to incorporate the parcel into the Plan. Upon the,
effective date of the comprehensive plan amendment. rezoning to a City zoning district
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -19
EAR - based Amendment
shall be initiated.
Policy 1.1.4.4.: The City shall consider appropriate means, such as bonding through the Northern
Palm Beach County `:'atci CV1Ai011 Improvement District, to guarantee that the
rights -of -way /easements required for Parkways are identified, acquired, and improved, arld to
L:_ a W_: _�- l L_ TL-__1___
QJJU111G VW11G1 J1111J 0.11LL 111Q111LG110.11GG Vl U1G 1 GLLGJL11Q1L 1`I0.LU1G 11Q11WayJ.
Policy 1.1.4.5.: The City shall encourage partnership between the private and public sector in the
provision of public facilities.
Objective 1.1.5.: Future growth, development, and redevelopment,'shall be directed to areas
as depicted on the Future Land Use Map, consistent with: sound planning principles; minimal
natural limitations; the goals, objectives, and policies contained within this Comprehensive
Plan; and the desired community character.
Policy 1.1.5.1.(a).1: For that area bounded by Florida's Turnpike to the east, PGA Boulevard
to the south, and the former existing (June 13,1989) city limits to the west and generally the
northern alignment of the Donald Ross Road extension, the City shall impose the following
requirements, and shall maintain , 111 QGGV1uQ11GG W1U1 JGGL1V11 1V,.,L.VL., 1 ". J., 1GV 1G W, and 1GV1JG
- -° --y , land development regulations necessary to implement these requirements.
W11GLG 11000JJ0.1
1. All proposed development shall include a minimum of 250 90 acres which shall be rezoned
to Planned Community District (PCD) and contain, at a minimum, a master development
plan and supporting documentation which describes what the development is to include and
how it is to proceed (phasing). All proposed collector roads within the development shall
be shown as part of the PCD master plan. A waiver from the minimum size threshold may
be granted by the City for recognized parcels of lesser size, or other hardship
circumstances,.
2. Individual development "pods" within an approved PCD shall undergo site plan review
ti it kic �c;zncd to 1armcd Uli iUD) which shall include, at a minimum, site
plans, landscape plans, and all proposed local roads.
3. The overall density of PCDs in this area shall not exceed the maximum density permitted
under the land use category.
4. Up to 2% of the gross land area of a PCD may be developed for commercial or office use.
5. Up to 5 % of the gross land area of a PCD may be developed for commercial or office use
if significantly large areas (10% or more) of native ecological habitats are preserved within
the PCD over and above those preserve or open space areas which may be required as a
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -20
EAR -based Amendment
minimum. Such habitat preservation areas shall be confined to only a few large areas,
rather than scattered throughout, and shall be connected to the Pedestrian/Nature Trailway
system.
6. If the entire area covered in this policy is developed under one PCD master development
plan, an additional 50 acres of commercial land use may be permitted over and above the
2 % and 5 % criteria described previously.
7. Up to 2% of the gross land area of a PCD may be developed.for industrial uses.
8. All PCDs shall be subject to the provisions of the Conceptual Linkage Plan for Northwest
Palm Beach Gardens as described in ulia Future Land Use. Transportation. and
Conservation elements.
2 The master development plan shall be consistent with and implement the City_ 's Conceptual
Thorouthfare Plan.
Policy 1.1.5.1.(a).2: For all properties west of the urban growth boundary (Loxahatchee Slough)
L:- aL_ L.._._]_0. L__ 1LT_rLl_l__ T__.1 __._�� aL_ ._ _aL T\_�_1.1 Tl___ Tl__..7 _ aL
W1LL1111 Lin, a1Ga uGuuu4u vy 19V1LLua1%.G 1JVU1,,valu LV LL1L, avuLn, 11vna1LL vwaa 1\V0.0 L,ALL.11K1V11 LV UM;
L _ -0. aL_ C__W__� _ _ 1'�_7a_ /T._ -_ 1-1 1AOfl\ a A_ _ __LS_L L__._ _ 0.____1_.�W
llvl Lll, 0.11u LLMI 1V1111L,1 Lilly L1111W kJU11L, 1J, 1707) LV L11G CraaL, w111Ld1 nav L, nu a"iv L, ul, v%,i0pME -In
_]_� _� _aL .,� _.__a_0. _a �_�a_0. L__ aL_ !"�:.�. _�.Tl_/W "___L l��._�a..
Vl U%,l Vl VLL1G1 VL,a LVLL OMLUa S1a11LL,LL Vy un, < ny Vl ra11111JL.a%,n \ voulnny, the City shall impose the
following requirements, and shall maintain , 111 a� uivail�% Wiul a�C,%iuil ;.;202, .S., i view,
__.:_ L___ _ land development regulations necessary to implement these
allu 1l, V 1KL, W 11G1L, 11L.l,L,aQaly ,
requirements.
1. Development shall be consistent with rural densities and intensities and shall receive.
services consistent with the adopted level of service standards for the rural area. All
proposed development shall include a minimum of 2..50 20 acres which shall be rezoned to
either: 1) Planned Community District (PCD) and contain, at a minimum, a master
development plan indicating all proposed collector roads and supporting documentation
which describes what the development is to include and how it is to proceed (phasing); or
2) Planned Unit Development (PUD) which shall include, at a minimum, site plans
landscape plans. and all proposed collector and local roads. All site plans 1' -i ''s
developed within PCDs shall be subject to the densities and intensities assigned to them
under the PCD master plan documentation. A waiver from the minimum size threshold
may be granted by the City Council for recognized parcels of lesser size, or other hardship
A 11 _� 0.____1__�__�a _L_ll l__0._ _ ..W L I1Gll _ L._1
Circumstances. All �JI V1JVKL,u u%,VL,ivpnt%aLL Knall mCiudC a llun"llulll V1 aci Ga w111Ld1
L_.11 L_ __] Tll_»__1 r1 _�_�_..� T1'_a�._a Tl�T1\ -0.. _
allall tA, 1L,GV11LrLL LV 1 1aAaCu i-vulinunny lJla LllbL `1 V1.1) anu L,V11La11, aL a llll ninulll, a
0.____1_��_�a -l_- _ -0. _L 0.___•L .. .. __a aL
lllaaLL,l U ;C10 JlUC11L pan and 0UFJJV1L111r, uVL.u1uG11LaLlVU W111L,11 ul:al,l lVL,a WllaL LL1G
A 11 .] .. ..11__a_�
U%,VG1VJJ111L,11L la Lv LAduG%, anu uvVY 1L lK LV FIVLrGGU �Jlla3Mr,). All YivYvaiu wu�L,w1 lvaua
W IMLaL_ _L_ll L_ _ _CaL_ Tbt1V% a_� 1_
ll L11L, uLi VL.1VF111%,111 Klan VV a11Vwn as pall Vl UK. 1 fill 111aaL1,1 filail.
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -21
EAR -based Amendment
2. Individual development "pods" within an approved PCD shall undergo site plan review
uc 1czoi�cu to Ma-iA-a%-,u UruL which shall include, at a minimum, site
plans, landscape plans, and all proposed local roads.
3. The overall density of PCD /PUDs in this area shall not exceed the maximum density
permitted under the land use category.
4. Site design shall be sensitive to the natural resources and environmental characteristics of
the' property.
5. All PCD /PUDs shall be subject to the provisions of the Conceptual Linkage Plan for
Northwest Palm Beach Gardens as described in uus the Future Land Use. Transportation.
and Conservation element.
6. The master development plan shall be consistent with and implement the City's Conceptual
Thoroughfare Plan.
Policy 1.1.5.1.(b): A land use overlay is hereby established and depicted on the Future Land Use
Map. This Density Reduction Land Use Overlay shall reduce the density potential within the
residential area of what is commonly referred to as TAX 848 by fifty percent, resulting in a
maximum gross density potential of two dwelling units per acre, with no provision for a density
bonus. Although a variety of uses and use intensities may be approved as part of a residential
PCD, the gross density shall be consistent with the density restrictions of this Overlay and shall
not exceed the impact of that generated by two dwelling units per acre. Development within the
Overlay shall be clustered to the least environmentally sensitive areas and shall be supported by
adequate facilities. The regulations and requirements of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of
Ordinances and Comprehensive Plan are applicable where not in conflict with the provisions of
this Overlay, including Policy 1.1.5.1(a).
Policy 1.1.5.2(a): For those areas which were annexed into the City in 1988 and which are
located within that area bounded by Donald Ross Road to the North, PGA Boulevard to the South,
Central Boulevard to the east, and Florida's Turnpike to the west, the City shall impose the
following requirements, and shall maintain ,ire acc�ruar�c� wii i 0c%,LLVLI i�3.3`�2, F.�., i%.vi%w,
anu rcvisc w'11 ire iicccssary, , land development regulations necessary to implement these
requirements.
1. All proposed development shall u�c�uuc a ���Lu��u��� cf 5� a%,r%;, which _1L
all be rezoned to
either: 1) Planned Community District (PCD) and contain, at a minimum, a master
development plan indicating all proposed collector roads and supporting documentation
which describes what the development is to include and how it is to proceed (phasing); or
2) Planned Unit Development (PUD) which shall include, at a minimum, site plans,
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -22
EAR -based Amendment
landscape plans, and all proposed collector and local roads. All site plans BLS
developed within PCDs shall be subject to the densities and intensities assigned to them
under the PCD master plan documentation.
2. With Citv Council approval of a densitv bonus. -Tthe overall density of PCDs or PUDs
in this area shall not exceed: 5.0 units per gross for those areas designated as RL; 9.0
units per gross acre for those areas designated RM; and 12 units per gross acre for those
areas designated RH.
3. In addition to the above, PCDs with an underlying Future Land Use designation of RH
may have_densities permitted up to 15.0 units per acre if significantly large areas (10% or
more) of native ecological habitats, in addition to the otherwise required open space and
preserves, are preserved within the PCD. One additional unit of density may be allowed
for each 10% of habitat which is preserved, up to a maximum of 15.0 units per acre.
These preserve areas would be over and above the minimum preservation and open space
areas provided in accordance with standard PCD requirements, and must be linked
irteerperated into the 1 GLLGJ1110.1L1 \0.LLL1G ilaaways Parkway system.
4. Up to 3 % of the gross land area of a residential PCD or PUD may be developed for
commercial or office use. However, these uses shall be restricted to neighborhood
commercial uses as they are defined in the City's least intensive commercial zoning
district.
5. Up to 5 % of the gross land area of a residential PCD may be developed for commercial
or office use if significantly large areas (10% or more) of native ecological habitats, in
addition to the otherwise required open space and preserves, are preserved within the PCD
over and above those preserve or open space areas which may be required as a minimum.
Such habitat preservation areas shall be confined to only a few large areas, and be
r a ._:__,,.,_�___ T__.,______ parkways stem. These uses shall be
connected to the rcu��ulall/1�a�u1G Llauway _ y
restricted neighborhood commercial uses as they are defined in the City's least intensive
zoning district.
6. If the entire area designated as RM on the Future Land Use Map on the west side of
Central Boulevard between I -95 and PGA Boulevard is developed under one PCD master
development plan, an additional 10 acres of commercial land use may be permitted over
and above the 3 % and 5 % criteria described previously.
7. All PCDs or PUDs shall be subject to the provisions of the Conceptual Linkage Plan for
Palm Beach Gardens as described in flris the Future Land Use. Transportation, and
Conservation element.
8.. The master development elan shall be consistent with and implement the Citv's Conceptual
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -23
EAR -based Amendment
Thoroughfare Plan.
Policy 1.1.5.2(b): For those areas which are located within that area bounded by Donald Ross
Road to the north, PGA Boulevard to the south, Alternate AlA to the east and Central Boulevard
to the west, the City shall impose the following requirements, and shall maintain n aeeordance
> r o __.__-- • -- -L ---, land development regulations
W 1LL1 UbLi L1Vi1 1VJ.JLVL, J".U., 1GY1{rW Q11LL 1V Y1Jb W11V-- 11L.L. ----1
necessary to implement these regulations.
1. All proposed development shall be rezoned to either: 1) Planned Community District
(PCD) and contain, at a minimum, a master development plan indicating all proposed
collector roads and supporting documentation which describes what the development is to
include and how it is to proceed (phasing); or 2) Planned Unit Development (PUD) which
shall include, at a minimum, site plans, landscape plans, and all proposed collector and
local roads. All i pis site plans developed within PCDs shall be subject to the densities
and intensities assigned to them under the PCD master plan documentation.
2. With Citv Council approval of a density bonus Txhe overall density of PCDs or PUDs in
this area shall not exceed: 5.0 units per gross acre for those areas designated as RL; 9.0
units per gross acre for those areas designated RM; and 12 units per gross acre for those
areas designated RH.
3. In addition to the above, PCDs with an underlying Future Land Use designation of RH
may have densities permitted up to 15.0 units per acre if significantly large areas (10% or
more) of native ecological habitats, in addition to the otherwise required open space and
preserves, are preserved within the PCD. One additional unit of density may be allowed
for each 10% of habitat which is preserved, up to a maximum of 15.0 units per acre.
These preserve areas would be over and above the minimum preservation and open space
areas provided in accordance with standard PCD requirements, and must be linked
in to the LjLQ�lwQy, Parkway system.
4. Up to 3% of the gross land area of a residential PCD or PUD may be developed for
commercial or office use. However, these uses shall be restricted to neighborhood
commercial uses as they are defined in the City's least intensive commercial zoning
district.
5. Up to 5 % of the gross land area of a residential PCD may be developed for commercial
or office use if significantly large areas (10% or more) of native ecological habitats are
preserved within the PCD over and above those preserve or open space areas which may
be required as a minimum. Such habitat preservation areas shall be confined to only a few
large areas, and be connected to the x i airway Parkway system where
possible. These uses shall be restricted neighborhood commercial uses as they are defined
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -24
EAR -based Amendment
in the City's least intensive zoning district.
6. All PCDs or PUDs shall be subject to the provisions of the Conceptual Linkage Plan for
Palm Beach Gardens as described in this the Future Land Use, Transportation, and
Conservation element.
7 The master development plan shall be consistent with and implement the City's Conceptual
Thoroughfare Plan.
Policy. 1.1.5.3.: For that area designated as Industrial on the Future Land Use Map bounded by
PGA Boulevard to the south, the Florida East Coast Railroad to the east, and I -95 to the west, the
City shall impose the following requirements, and shall maintain , in accordancc with seetIoll
L7 jL o __._ __ 1 _ __ L___ _ y, land development regulations which are
1VJ.JGVL, r, J., LV Y1l.W, --A 11.V1J1. W1R-- 11 -----
necessary to implement these requirements:
1. No vehicular access shall be permitted across the north boundary of the site.
2. Site design shall incorporate significant setbacks from the dedicated public easement,
which separates the parcel from those to the north, and include buffering techniques to
mitigate impacts on adjacent land uses.
Policy 1.1.5.4.(x): The City shall assign a maintain planned development area (PDA) zoning
vra,llQy 1Qllu use cat cg;,r;y to all undeveloped non - conservation lailLL West VL A0{VL11Ql\. ALA Qrlu
_YaL _1. x A „___,_____1 for which a development plan has not been approved by the City. The
11V1 LL1 Vl 1 VA 17VU1�.VQ1
"I A
1 J.JA VV_rl 1 Qy 1Qr11U .3 aL_ : TT A
LLsc bQa 6gVly J11Q11 VV WL11VLL�11 LLll11JA G_ Vlillg ual]s_au�l7a
. The PDA
zoning arlu overpay la- -u use catcgo ie, shall apply to all properties over 10 acres in size and in the
urban area, shall be regarded a "holding zone" until development of the said properties is
requested pursuant to the comprehensive plan. At the time of the rezoning of the land from PDA
to PUD or PCD, the underlying land use shall guide the intensity and type of development. All
nronosed development shall be of character consistent with the `urban' or `rural' distinctions
established by the Urban Growth Boundary (Policy 1.1.5,4.(b)), The permitted uses, in the urban
Brea, under the PDA district shall include single - family residences at the density of one dwelling
unit per ten acres, public parks and recreation facilities, and as conditional uses agriculture and
institutional uses such as churches and fire stations. Permitted uses, in the rural area shall include
single - familv residences at a density consistent with the Future Land Use designation (I du /10 ar.
or 1 du /20ac). agriculture and public safetv facilities. Agricultural uses shall not be permitted
in environmentally sensitive preservation areas. Development within PDA shall be clustered and,
in the urban area, shall be supported by potable water, sanitary sewer and adequate roadway
facilities. Septic tanks shall be prohibited in the urban area in the PDA except for an individual
single family residence. however. in the rural area. septic tanks are the standard. Uses In the
rural area shall receive services consistent with the adopted level of service standards. The
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -25
EAR -based Amendment
rezoning of PDA to PUD or PCD shall occur only when the aDDlicable urban and rural services
and facilities necessary to support the intensity of such development'will be in place concurrent
with the impacts of the development. Suci Siaii v%,%,ui iii a juldalulcr wliC i rcYic,cll S
Yiv�iwaiv� �nYa�l�ivil vi u1c �,nlOililZ; u vail aLCao auu aiiaii LIOL Yivlilvw Rap -live ucv�,ivY1u%ilt.
The extension of public facilities into areas zoned PDA shall be consistent with the urban and rural
level of service standards, maximize the use of existing facilities and services, encourage compact
urban development and discourage the proliferation of urban sprawl. Concurrent with rezoning
to PCD /PUD. any uses not Dermitted by the underlvin_c land use cate_cory shall cease consistent
with the Dhasine Dlan of the aDDroved PCD /PUD
Policy 1.1.5.4.(b): In order to prevent urban sprawl and promote cost effective and efficient
service delivery. the City shall designate an Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) which generally
coincides with the eastern boundary of the Loxahatchee Slough. The UGB shall be designated on
the Future Land Use Map (Map A). The UGB divides the City into distinct areas, urban and rural.
These two distinct areas shall be designated with land uses (densities and intensities) consistent with
urban and rural characteristics and shall receive public services and facilities at levels appropriate
for such urban and rural uses, as defined in the Capital Improvement Element
Policy 1.1.5.5.: In a:vvrua:lcv wiLi �%1iL11V11 ��;.j202, t The City shall maintain revieva -,
___.:__ ___L___ _____ �, land development regulations requiring residential neighborhoods to
Q11LL 1GV1JG W11G1G 11000JJQI ,
be designed to include an efficient system of internal circulation, including the provision of
collector streets, to feed traffic onto arterial roads and highways., New development shall
accommodate new local roads depicted on the Conceptual Thoroughfare Plan.
Policy 1.1.5.6.: In QGGVL.]_a__ _ _it _ — 1_111 Innn, 1-. The City shall maintain Lev-ievr-,
LLQIIGG W1U1 JGGl1V11 1VJ.JLVL 1' U.
a ____:__ __.L___ y, land development regulations requiring subdivisions to be designed
al1U 1GV1JG W11G1G 11000JJQI
so that all individual lots have access to the internal street system, and lots along the periphery are
buffered from major roads and incompatible land uses.
1 V11\..y 1.1.J. / .. 1116 1..1L�' GL1GVUl Qb'GJ U1G 1VGQL1V11 Vl Q 111QJV1 U1JLILULG Vl 11t6111_,1 GULLGQL1V11 W 1L11111
L11G t.1L�y Vl 1LJ lULU1G QL111GAQL1V11 aL%;a.
Policy 1.1.5.7$.: By the year 2000, the location of a district park shall be selected: acquisition
negotiations shall be established with the Droperty owner; recreational facilities shall be identified;
and funding strategies shall be determined in conjunction with Palm Beach County. loeated within
"/_a` __ t _�_ L._ _.1 _�a__� C aL_ Tll__ L_ /'.: a__ 1_11 .]_a __.�_:i- 11,,,
VV 1_111111 LWV �'GQLJ 11V111 L11G aukipt1V11 Vl L11G 11Q11, U1G \.1LY J11Q11 LLGLG1111111G LI1G
L____L21_ti_ _ A._a____� -/_ _ L_ L..__. _� _. Z L_ T _ _L _._L __ (''1____L _ ,1 T!"� l
1GQJ1 V111Ly V1 1VGQL111r, Q U1JL11GL FairL QL ULG 11V1L11LiQJL GV111G1 Vl U1m, LVAQIiaM.,1 GG U1Vuru Q11LL 1 VA
Policy 1.1.5.$9.: Owners of property containing uses not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
and Land Development Regulations will be notified that their use is nonconforming and will be
required to come into compliance or be eliminated no later than 7 years from the date the use
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -26
EARL based Amendment
became nonconforming. The City Council may, on a case -by -case basis, exempt a non-
conforming use only after a public hearing is held to consider its compatibility with surrounding
properties. The City Council may require additional buffering, screening and modifications to
bring the property more into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development
Regulations. These uses will not be allowed to expand, and if damaged or destroyed by more than
50% of their value, will not be allowed to be reestablished. `scc.Ud_LIILILIVLI �M OUFFVI L
DeeumentW. Nonconforming uses are defined as lots, structures, and uses of land and structures
that were lawful before the adoption or amendment of a regulation, but which would be prohibited,
regulated or restricted under the terms of the regulation or future amendment
Objective 1.1.6.: The City's economic base shall be expanded by promoting commercial and
industrial activities as planned and illustrated on the Future Land Use Map, by ailfieXHIg ilew
areas Vr iuLUiv rivrrii, and by ensuring adequate sites and timely provision of public
'utilities and services to stimulate such growth.
Policy 1.1.6.1.: Development orders and permits for future development and redevelopment
activities shall be issued only in areas possessing the appropriate Future Land Use designation and
that are consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of this Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 1.1.6.2.: All proposed commercial and industrial development requiring a change on the
Future Land Use Map in order to be approved shall submit a market study indicating the economic
feasibility of the development and the locational advantage over existing commercial and industrial
lands.
Policy 1.1.6.3.: The City shall coordinate future annexation areas (Map J) with the affected land
owners, governments, and agencies for the future annexation and land uses of these areas.
Policy 1.1.6.4.: New commercial properties shall be developed in nodes, at intersections rather
than strips. A mix of uses within commercial developments shall be encouraged, including
residential, and parks and open space.
Policy 1.1.6.5.: PGA Boulevard shall be developed as the "Main Street" of Palm Beach Gardens
using the following techniques:
a. FollowinLy completion of the PGA Boulevard /Alternate AlA urban interchange, a new
CRALLS (Constrained Roadway at a Lower Level of service) -A Level of Service Standard
for PGA Boulevard shall be determined in coordination with Palm Beach County, the
Regional Planning Council, and the State Department of Transportation with the maximum
number of lanes being six;
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -27
EAR -based Amendment
b. The Citv shall maintain the PGA design guidelines as regulations A strcascap,c u-s —Yea„
shall uc u%vcIopcu uy 13» which require the utilization of shall utiliz landscaping,
boulevard strips, pedestrian walkways, bikeways, buffers, and setbacks to emphasize the
various functions of PGA Boulevard as a divider of different land uses and as a center of
the City;
Policv 1.1.6.6: Within two years after it has been determined that the Tri -Rail will utilize the
FEC tracks and serve northeastern Palm Beach County , the City shall undertake a study of the
vacant lands lying within one quarter mile of the FEC railroad line paralleling Alternate AlA.
The purnose of this study is to determine the location(s) best suited for a future train station and
appropriate uses for vacant lands in order to promote transit- oriented development. The findings
shall be incorporated into the Evaluation and Appraisal Report and any desired changes to the Plan
shall be identified as future EAR -based amendments. The study shall consider desired forms of
development patterns outlined in the Treasure Coast Strategic Regional Policy Plan.
Policv 1.1.6.7.: The City shall initiate proactive efforts to expand the economic base of the City,
workinLy within the framework of existinL, economic agencies and groups, such as the North
County Mavors Economic Development Group, the Palm Beach County Business Development
Board and County Economic Development Department. Strategies shall include considering the.
creation of a Citv Economic Development Advisory Board to create an economic element of the.
comprehensive plan: improving communication and forging alliances with major property owners
in order to coordinate efforts in attracting new businesses: accelerating the development approval
process: encouraging redevelopment of distressed properties; and maintaining points of contact
with economic development agencies.
Objective 1.1.7.: 2 ��W _r�_W _ _ L -_ ,,. Th
rr1W1111 LIM 611116llMIM IJlVVIUGU Uy UGC11V11 iVJ.JlrVf+ �i�I L3. i_ eClty
shall maintain adapt land development regulations containing standards and provisions which
encourage the elimination or reduction of uses inconsistent with the City's character and
future land uses.
Policy 1.1.7.1.: Expansion or replacement of land uses which are incompatible with the Future
Land Use' Plan shall be prohibited.
Policy 1.1.7.2.: Regulations for buffering incompatible land uses shall be set forth in the City's
land development regulations.
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -28
EAR -based Amendment
Objective 1.1.8.: The City shall improve coordination with affected and appropriate
governments and agencies to maximize their input into the planning and development process
and mitigate potential adverse impacts of future development and redevelopment activities.
Policy 1.1.8.1.: The Future Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan shall locate
residential areas and establish densities in coastal areas in a manner consistent with the Palm Beach
County Peaeetime Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan.
Policy 1.1.8.2.: The City shall cooperate with the Palm Beach Countywide Intergovernmental
Coordination Procram and /or Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council i iaiuuiig CCur�c11 to
settle land use disputes between the City and adjacent municipalities 'or unincorporated areas.
Policy 1.1.8.3.: Requests for development orders or permits shall be coordinated, as required,
with Palm Beach County, adjacent municipalities, the Countywide Intergovernmental Coordination
Proeram. Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, ;?laruu��� C;,u�,�ll, South Florida Water
Management District, and state and federal agencies.
FUTURE LAND USE 12/97 1 -29
EAR -based Amendment
TRANSPORTATION " 1A1 iC CARL%- . ,r, i I ELEMENT
The following abbreviations and acronyms are used throughout this Transportation Element:
AADT Average Annual Daily Trips
County Palm Beach County
FDOT Florida Department of Transportation
FIHS Florida Intrastate Highway System as defined in s. 338.001 F. S.
MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization
TPSO Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, August ,1995
Goals, Objectives and Policies
GOAL 2.1.: THE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM IN PALM BEACH GARDENS SHALL
BE CONVENIENT, SAFE, AND EFFICIENT FOR ALL PERSONS LIVING IN AND
TRAVELING THROUGH THE CITY.
Objective 2.1.1.: 'T'- - ' -- -- ' -" To maintain specific level of service OS
J 1116 1 VQUrr Qy Jy JLGlli JuQll P (L
standards on the roadways.
Policy 2.1.1.1.: Level of service standards shall be as shown on Table 2A 2 -7 and shall be
applicable to the urban and rural service areas. Level of service for a%i1i%ivs v–R tl�� rotate ailu
r___ TT:_L______ Cl__ -__ FIHS roads will be measured utilizing the FDOT Generalized Peak Hour
VVU11ly lllb'llway Sy JLG111J g
Directional LG V GI Vl 0 V 1GG 1V1aJ11anni1 Volumes for Florida's Ur��,J'Urbanlzed Areas (Table 2B 2_
$), or FDOT Generalized two -way Peak Hour Volumes for Florida's Urbanized Areas (Table 2C -2_
9), or as calkLUatcd, b- u�� Ci%y, utilizing the FDOT Florida Highway System Plan Level of Service
Standards and Guidelines Manual (FDOT Manual) and the 1994 Highway Capacity Manual
(HCM) procedures contained in the Special Report 209.3`d Edition. 1994.. Level of service for non-
FIHS roads that are part of the County thoroughfare system will be measured utilizing the volumes
provided in the 1997 Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element (Table 2D
2 -10), or utilizing the methodologies provided in the TPSQ. Level of service for city roads will be
measured utilizing the service volumes and capacities adopted in the City's Traffic Performance
Standards Ordinance (Table 2E 2 -11) or as ca�cula «u by ZR1, �i%y utilizing the FDOT Manual and
1994 +985 HCM procedures.
Note to reader: Policy 2.1.1.1 will be revised prior to final adoption to reflect the 1997/98 HCM to be released in March,
1998.
Policy 2.1.1.2.: The City will amend its comprehensive plan and land development ordinances as
needed to maintain consistency between its accepted methods of measuring the level of service on
FIHS or County thoroughfare roads and the most current methods adopted by the FDOT or County,
r - n 1 - -11 1 ----- _ - - -1 - --'.t_ A_
respectively. LG G1 l Vr L nUGl -VLGG staiidaids LVl Statc \VauJ J1Q1 VG GVV1u110.LGU
w1L11 L11G 1'1V11ua
T` -- -- - - - - -� - r'T'--- --- --- --� -�' --- --- 1-- ---- - -_i1 -- -- a_L1] -1 - -A --- -J__J_ J_rr --- C- - - -- .1 - - -- -ra__ rn -- -=J-
1JGrJ0.1L111Gl11 VL 110.11JIJV1l0.L1V11 w11G11G VGl L11G GJL0.V11J11GL1 JlQ11U0.1L1J Ul'11G1 11 Vlll L11VJG Vl L11G 11V11Ua
T
D/ _ ____s a1U11Glll V _rT -_ -_�_
PL 110.L1JJJV1L0.L1V11.
Policy 2.1.1.3.: The City shall review all development proposals Proposed LLV YlilV�J111G11W fr�j��ts
for consistency with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of this element plan including consistency
with the traffic circulation plans and the level of service standards. An assessment of the projected
TRANSPORTATION 2198 2 -1
EAR -Based Amendments
The impact of tra€fie proiect generated traffic U a PtcPoscu fr`cct on the roadway network
_ 1 _�
within and serving the City shall be obtained,. 11casurG.1 L Vg_JG_U on The net amount of project trips
projected at projeet build out will be used as a guideline for determining by Yia,c; arlu on the
radius of development influence. At a minimum, road seements within the appropriate radius
as noted J1 of,vin on Table 2F 246 will be analyzed. The Droiect's impacts will be projected for
each phase of the proiect through the estimated date of completion,
Policv 2,1,1,4,; Per Countywide Traffic Performance Standards, and notwithstanding Policy
2.1.1.1. the Level of Service D for the links listed on Table 2A which have a volume to capacity
ratio of greater than 1.00 therein may be exceeded by up to a total of five percent (5 % ) of Level
of Service D as computed on an AADT basis. These roadway links elidble for the excess fiv,,,
percent will be presumed to pass the average peak hour test. This five percent shall be the,
cumulative traffic from all proiects or project amendments approved increasing or redistributing
traffic for which application was made on or after February 1. 1990 based upon a model run,
inpludine the $ocio- economic data from such development. This excess five percent shall be
allocated on a first - come - first- served application -filed basis; provided no project may use more.
than three -fifths (3 /5ths) of the five percent available on any other link based upon the project's
traffic impact study. Notwithstanding the three percent (3 %) limitation as stated at the bottom of
Table 2F, net proiect trips within the maximum Radius of Development Influence shall be
accumulated toward the five percent allocation.
Policy 2.1.1.5.: By 2000, in cooperation with the County and neighboring jurisdictions, the City shall
evaluate the potential benefits of various transportation demand management strategies and
transportation system management strategies in improving the capacity of roadways in the City
without the addition of lanes. An example of a strategy that might be evaluated is negotiating
agreements with area employers to stagger their work hours. From this evaluation, a list of strategies
of potential benefit will be developed.
Policy 2.1.1.6.4.-: The City shall pPrepare, in conjunction with the MPO and other governmental
agencies, a bi- annual a report that i4ilk"Ll identifies City collectors which have no excess service
volume; and develop a list of improvements, transportation demand, and transportation system
management strategies to increase that service volume. Before adding improvements for constrained
or physically- limited roadways to the Capital Improvement Program or before adopting a lower
level of service standard for the roadway, the City will attempt to improve roadway capacity by
implementing the transportation demand and transportation system management strategies identified
as of greatest potential benefit by the evaluation referred to in Policy 2.1.1.4.
Policy 2.1.1.7.5-.: The City shall dDevelop, on an annual basis, a Capital Improvement Program for
roadway improvements within the City. The findings of the annual report prepared under Policy
2.1.1.4 shall be utilized in developing the Capital Improvement Program.
Note to reader: The County-wide Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance was adopted in 1990. City Land
Development Regulations adopted 8/18/94 are consistent with the requirements of the TPSO.
T_1•___ 1 1 / _Tl__ !i_�_ _L _11 � 7 mil__ T nn _�___�___�_ T_1•__
1 V11G�' A, . A. A. V.. 111, %-LLY 3110.11 LGYLGW 0.L1U 1CiY13G W11G1- 11G,GJJ0.1y '111- LIJU 310.11Uai.U3 111 1 Vll,y
rl 1 1 1 ____ ___:a1_ ___1_�_______
6.1.1.1. LV ,V111V1111 W1111 L11G ,V Ulll�' -W1UG 11[1111, 1 G11V11110./1,G U10.11UQ1 UJ, W11G11 CL11U 11 QUVJIIGU.
TRANSPORTATION 2198 2 -2
EAR -Based Amendments
Policy 2.1.1.8.x.: Proposed roadway projects will be reviewed and ranked in order of priority
according to the following guidelines:
a) Whether the project is needed to protect public health and safety, to fulfill the
County's legal commitment to provide facilities and services, or to preserve or
achieve full use of existing facilities;
b) Whether the project increases efficiency of use of existing facilities, prevents or
reduces future improvement cost, provides service to developed areas lacking full
service, or promotes in -fill development;
TRANSPORTATION 2198 2 -3
EAR -Based Amendments
TABLE 2A: LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
Facility Type Peak Hour Level of Service Standard
Neighborhood Collector
City Collector
Non -FIHS roads that are part of the County Thoroughfare Plan:
C ual,y C�,. 11caor
County Minor Arterial
State Minor Arterial
State Principal Arterial
FIHS roads
T
LiIJULAV,U AVVGJJ 1'CRilllly
Excepted Links:
State Principal Arterial: PGA Boulevard between U.S. 1
and Alternate A 1 A: and between Alternate A 1 A and I-
95
--------------- - - - --
State Minor Arterial: Military between Northlake
Blvd and I -95
Citv Collector: Burns Road from I -95 to Military Trail
r TRANSPORTATION 2198 2-4
EAR -Based Amendments
LOS "F " with 55,200 daily
trips and 73,000 daily trips,
respectively, until PGA
Blvd/Altemate A 1 A urban
interchange is constructed.
Interchange improvement
expected in Year 2001 -2005.
See Policy 1.1.6.5.
LOS "F" with 63,900 daily
trips until December. 1999.
+-------------------------------
LOS "F" until I -95 is
widened & Burns can be
expanded. I -95 improvement
expected in Year 2011 -2015
- TABLE
2B
GENEItA.L-IZED PE.A X HOUR DIRECTIONAL VOLLTNMS FOR FLORIDA'S
URBANIZED AREAS*
STATE TWO -WAY IRTERJAIS
FREEWAYS
U4t%'r13 JtLri to 17-OW
Group 1(witlsin arbani=d area over 500.000 and leading to or witbin
Unsignalized
5 miles of primary city seatral business district)
Level OI Service
Level of Service
Laces A B C D
E
Lanes A B C D E
4 1.I00 1.760 2.640 3.350
4.040
2 Undiv. 460 %20 980 1.ZW 1,710 -
6 1,660 2.640 3.970 5.030
6_3-W
4 Div. 1.110 1.350 2.590 3.110 3,700
8 2-110 3.530 5 .290 6.-,W
8.460
6 Div. 1.670 1730 3.890 4.660 5550
10 2.760 4.410 6.620 3.380
10.570
12 3.160 5.050 7580 9.610
12.100
l2NTERR1rrMD FLOW
Group 2 (within urbanized arc and trot in Group 1)
C1233 la (>0.00 to 2.49 signalized intersections per mile)
Level of Service
Level of Service
Canes A 8 C D
E
Lanes A•• B C. D... E`•'
4 1.060 1.740 :50 "-o
3,r•m
2 Undiv. 560 310 380 ?00 C
5 1.500 =60 :.340 1.560
4 Div. 1.370 1.760 1.390 1.390 L
8 2.130 3.410 5.1 I0 o.4S0
3. i 70
A Div. 2.:30 :.660 =340 2.340 A
l0 :.670 4260 6.300 3:100
!0.210
3 Div. - :.3.10 3 230 3.430 3.480 S
13 3.0!0 4.8+0 ;.310 (1.2-0
11.5on
S
�
Class lb (:..50:o 4.:0 signalized intersections per mile)
NON -STATE ROADWAYS
Level of Service I
MAJOR CrrY /COUNTY ROADWAYS
uncv A" B•• C D E
: Undiv. - 460 760 8•W
Level of Service
4 Div. - - 1.020 1.640 1.800
Lanes A" B" C D
E
6 Div. - - 1.550 2.510 3,710
2U8div. - - 560 730
300
3 Div. - 1.890 3.060 3.320
4 Div. - - 1 .260 1.660
1.71-0
6 Div. 1,950 2.450
2.600
Class U (more than 4-50 signalized intersections per mile and not
OTHER SIGNALIZED ROADWAYS
within primary city central business district of urbanized
(signalized intersection analysis)
area over 500,000) C
Level of Service
Level of Service L
Latta A" B" C D
E
Lanes A" B•. Ca• D E A
3Undiv. - - 370 530
600
Undiv. - ... 620 800 S
4. Div. - 500 1.170
i
1?
TABT -F 2C
GEN1'ERAUZED TWO -WAY PEAK HOUR VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S
URBANIZED AREAS*
II 1 111
STATE TWO -WAY ARTERIALS
l.•YLYrERJt or=FLOW
Li asgnallzed
Lanes A
2 Undiv. 810
4 Div. 1.950
6 Div. 2,930
Level of Service
B C D
1.270 1,720 2.260
3,260 4,560 5,470
4,390 6,840 8,210
E
3,010
6.510
9,770
LYIERRLrik-u
FLOW
Class la (>0.00 to 2.49 signalized intersections per mile)
Level of Service
C
Level of Service
A
Lanes A"
B C D -•'
E'••
2 Undiv. -
1,170 1,420 1550
1,580
4 Div. -
2.590 3.100 3.320
3-330 C
6 Div. -
4,020 4.690 5.000
:.000 L
3 Div. -
5,010 3.770 6.1'_0
5.120 A
2.440
3,070
S
Class lb (250 to 4.50 signalized intersections per mile)
s
4.650
0
t
Lanes A" B • •
2 Undiv -
4 Div - -
6 Div. -
8 Div. -
Level of Service
C D
830 1,330
1.790 2,890
Z720 4,420
3.330 5.390
E
1.480
3,160
4,780
5,850
Class II (more than 450 signalized intersections per mile and not within
primary city central business district of urbanized
Level of Service
C
area over 500,000)
A
B
L
D
Level of Service
4
A
Lanes A• B•■
C•■ D
E
S
2 Undiv. - -
- 1.090
1,400
S
4 Div. - -
2.440
3,070
3.700
6 Div. - -
- '3.750
4.650
0
8 Div.
4570
5.690
11.600
14,300
18.600
12
5,600
Class III (mom than 4.50 signalized intersections per mile and within
13580
primary city central business district of urbanized
21.300
C
area over 500,000)
Lanes
L
2
L.cvel of Service
A
Lanes A" El"
C•• D
E
s
2 Undiv.
- I.=0
1.370
s
4 Div. - -
- 2.710
3.000
6,000
6 Div. - -
4.130
4.530
It!
8 Div. -
5.030
5.530
3.600
A
MEL -WAYS
Group I (within urbanized 1 e4 over 500,000 and le4ding to or passing
_ n i ■ i io li i ■
• TN■ uPSe Je nr avw■w a asi■W s,■1 WrYI Ir rn1,.Nr ■+r `wnsl plan■w� spp1 -±• -�i TIM ornpMrr ■■�1e4 trawl .■.eL i�a WM r JerfrwJ Yrr W Iva rtsd IM ware sp■nic plwwwC applKSnwi
TIM uHM rY Jnw■C awp ■s ■■tkr mat sw A ww) N raw.►• n ■■wrCHw m[T .t,e. w,wr R1LII,I MIO ■■q1A saaw YNe sl■.►w sn nw.v■r A+aI. wMwwd to.ar.w ItM tow HiSOva� Gann
Manus) Upia■ ral F1ti■L IA(ne. ■m0►sr "sRn Irma■ J■o T. wernn ■\ uwuJ III .L,y en(Re w Iw■m ,ns■ •alwa m" M Ji-kd 1ty caw app Vm.e K._ (aCY.f (wunwg: a• ft4 "It A Ors■
r. Sa,1r arstrie n�■.; s ICw wwr� Ns .ww11. TLr urw■'s �M■ •slus s■wnp■w se.l fa+�sl.J Mn.c■ .nMns spput .w W IMCL
•• Cann. ti ahtr d
••• V,.I.u.,aa Ms aa.wpuJW 1MCa,s■ ,nMrrn.w up.ere v■ nac;t-L "TUT
1f0.1M od
S..nr: FknJs DrOsnws ■I.J Trwp.ln.w Iw7.
within 5 miles of primary city antral business district)
,NWOR u i Y /COUNTY ROADWAYS
Level of Service
Level of Service
Lanes
A
B
C
D
E
4
1.900
3.100
4,700
5,900
7,100
6
2.800
4,400
6.700
8.500
10.700
8
3.700
5.000
8,900
11,300
14.200 .
10
4,900
7.300
11.600
14,300
18.600
12
5,600
3.900
13580
16.000
21.300
Group 2 (within urbanized area and not in Group 11
(alter corresponding two-way volume indicated peroent)
Lanes
Median Left Turn Bays Adjustment Factors
2
Level of Service
2
Lanes
A
B
C
D
E
4
LOW
3.000
4-500
5.700
6,000
6
2.700
4.300
6.400
8.200
10.300
3
3.600
5.700
3.000
10,000
13. %00
10
4,700
7.500
11.300
14,300
18.000
l2
5,400
8.600
12,900
16.300
20.600
_ n i ■ i io li i ■
• TN■ uPSe Je nr avw■w a asi■W s,■1 WrYI Ir rn1,.Nr ■+r `wnsl plan■w� spp1 -±• -�i TIM ornpMrr ■■�1e4 trawl .■.eL i�a WM r JerfrwJ Yrr W Iva rtsd IM ware sp■nic plwwwC applKSnwi
TIM uHM rY Jnw■C awp ■s ■■tkr mat sw A ww) N raw.►• n ■■wrCHw m[T .t,e. w,wr R1LII,I MIO ■■q1A saaw YNe sl■.►w sn nw.v■r A+aI. wMwwd to.ar.w ItM tow HiSOva� Gann
Manus) Upia■ ral F1ti■L IA(ne. ■m0►sr "sRn Irma■ J■o T. wernn ■\ uwuJ III .L,y en(Re w Iw■m ,ns■ •alwa m" M Ji-kd 1ty caw app Vm.e K._ (aCY.f (wunwg: a• ft4 "It A Ors■
r. Sa,1r arstrie n�■.; s ICw wwr� Ns .ww11. TLr urw■'s �M■ •slus s■wnp■w se.l fa+�sl.J Mn.c■ .nMns spput .w W IMCL
•• Cann. ti ahtr d
••• V,.I.u.,aa Ms aa.wpuJW 1MCa,s■ ,nMrrn.w up.ere v■ nac;t-L "TUT
1f0.1M od
S..nr: FknJs DrOsnws ■I.J Trwp.ln.w Iw7.
NON- STA'L'E ROADWAYS
,NWOR u i Y /COUNTY ROADWAYS
Level of Service
Lanes
A" B•• C D
E
2 Undiv
- 990 1 '�90
1.410
4 Div.
- - Z=O Z820
3,030
6 Div.
- - 3,440 4 ,320
4,570
OTHER SIGNAT 17ED ROADWAYS
(signalized intersection analysis)
Level of Service
Lanes
A" B■■ C D
E
2 Undiv
- 470 930
1.060
4 Div.
- - 1.030 21060
2.290
ADJUSTMENTS
DIVIVED ltvarvtDED
•
(alter corresponding two-way volume indicated peroent)
Lanes
Median Left Turn Bays Adjustment Factors
2
Divided Yes +5%
2
Undivided. No -20,70
Multi
Undivided Yes -5%
Multi
Undivided No -255C
ONE -WAY
(alter corresponding two-way volume indicated percent)
One -Way Corresponding Adjustment
Lanes Two-Way Lanes Factor
2 4 40%
3 6 -40+b
4 8 -40%
5 8 .25x0
_ n i ■ i io li i ■
• TN■ uPSe Je nr avw■w a asi■W s,■1 WrYI Ir rn1,.Nr ■+r `wnsl plan■w� spp1 -±• -�i TIM ornpMrr ■■�1e4 trawl .■.eL i�a WM r JerfrwJ Yrr W Iva rtsd IM ware sp■nic plwwwC applKSnwi
TIM uHM rY Jnw■C awp ■s ■■tkr mat sw A ww) N raw.►• n ■■wrCHw m[T .t,e. w,wr R1LII,I MIO ■■q1A saaw YNe sl■.►w sn nw.v■r A+aI. wMwwd to.ar.w ItM tow HiSOva� Gann
Manus) Upia■ ral F1ti■L IA(ne. ■m0►sr "sRn Irma■ J■o T. wernn ■\ uwuJ III .L,y en(Re w Iw■m ,ns■ •alwa m" M Ji-kd 1ty caw app Vm.e K._ (aCY.f (wunwg: a• ft4 "It A Ors■
r. Sa,1r arstrie n�■.; s ICw wwr� Ns .ww11. TLr urw■'s �M■ •slus s■wnp■w se.l fa+�sl.J Mn.c■ .nMns spput .w W IMCL
•• Cann. ti ahtr d
••• V,.I.u.,aa Ms aa.wpuJW 1MCa,s■ ,nMrrn.w up.ere v■ nac;t-L "TUT
1f0.1M od
S..nr: FknJs DrOsnws ■I.J Trwp.ln.w Iw7.
TABLE 21): MAXIMUM VOLUMES FOR non -FIRS COUNTY THOROUGHFARF
ROADS
Tv_ pe of road
2lanes undivided
LOS D Threshold
AADT/ Peak Hour
14.300/1.330
LOS E Threshold
AADT/ Peak Hour
15,900/1480
3 lanes two -way
15,000/1,400
16,700/1,550
2 lanes one -way
18,700/1,730
20,400/2,000
3 lanes one -way
28,500/2,650
30,800/2,870
4lanes undivided
23.300/2,170
25.500/2,370
4lanes divided
31.100/2,890
34.000/3,160
5 lanes divided
31,100/2,890
34.000/3.160
6lanes divided
47,500/4,420
51.400/4.780
Blanes divided
58,000/5,390
62,900/5,850
4lanes expressway
67,000/5,900
80.800/7,100
6 lanes expressway
100,600/8,500
126.900/10,700
8 lanes expressway
134.100/11,300
169,200/14,200
10 lanes expressway
167,700/14,800
211.400/18,600
Source: Palm Beach County Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element Test One Level
of Service Thresholds Tables, June 5, 1997
TRANSPORTATION 2198 2 -7
EAR -Based Amendments
"Note to reader: These are from the current City ordinance, not current TCRPC or FDOT standards -
TABLE 2E: MAXIMUM VOLUMES FOR CITY ROADS
GENERALIZED DAILY TWO -WAY SERVICE VOLUMES AND CAPACITIES
"TT1TIM" 7 TA .TTT\
`V 1 A L' A\ l/AIVAA A I
Level of
Service
2 -Lane
road
4 -Lane
divided
arterial
6 -lane
divided
arterial
8 -lane
divided
arterial
6 -lane
expwy.
8 -lane
expwy.
10 lane
expwy.
A
9,800
22,500
1 34,800
45,000
71,000
94,600
118,200
B
11,500
26,300
1 40,600
52,600
83,600
111,100
138,800
C
13,100
30,000
46,400
60,000
95,000
126,700
158,300
D
15,800
36,500
55,800
72,000
114,000
152,000
190,000
E
17,400
40,000
61,900
80,000 j
126,700 j
168,900 j
211,100
GENERALIZED PEAK HOUR TWO -WAY SERVICE VOLUMES AND CAPACITIES
/T TT171TT1 T TI�.TTT\
V, %.)a A x" x%. LAlVAA A I
Level of
Service
2 -Lane
road
4 -Lane
divided
arterial
6 -lane
divided
arterial
8 -lane
divided
arterial
6 -lane
expwy.
8 -lane
expwy.
10 lane
expwy.
A
880
2,025
3,130
4,050
6,390
8,785
10,640
B
1,035
2,365
3,655
4,735
7,525
10,000
12,490
C
1,180
2,700
4,175
5,400
8,550
11,405
14,245
D
1,420
3,240
5,020
6,480
10,260
13,680
17,100
E
1,565
3,600
5,570
7,200
11,403
15,200
19,000
0 ___�___ T__'____7 !'�_________t_________ Tl___ T/"1T)T!"� A____'I 1A 100^7
0.3- RxClgloila1 CoinpicI1G11J1ic 1 lall, l l.il-1 ,-, C1j/111 /-V, 170/
City of Palm Beach Gardens Traffic Performance
Standards (Ordinance 45 -1988)
TRANSPORTATION 2198 2 -8
EAR -Based Amendments
i civic 240 TABLE 2F: i ;n ; L^, i ;' u,i
C) Whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities and services within a
designated urban service area; and
d) Whether the project will contribute to the achievement of level of service volumes
set forth in Policy 2.1.1.1.
Policy 2.1.1.9.: The City Council shall retain the right to adopt LOS "E" for roads or specific
segments of roads within transit oriented developments, where to do so would be consistent with
established planning practice in promoting a pedestrian/transit oriented environment.
Policy 2.1.1.10.9.: City Council shall retain the right to adopt alternative Level of Service standards
for specified roadway links, which, due to circumstances beyond their control, are currently or are
projected to exceed the Level of Service standard in Policy 2.1.1.1., or if improvements to a roadway
link or intersection will be prohibited due to physical, environmental, historical, or aesthetic
constraints. Alternate levels of service shall be, to the maximum extent feasible, consistent with the
State and County standards.
Policy 2.1.1.11.: The City shall investigate possible mechanisms for removing "ghost trips" from
City roads. "Ghost trips" arise when development proceeds at a lower intensity than that at which
it was approved. The City shall include a provision in all new development orders specifying that.,
under certain conditions, the City may down -zone a project to reflect the actual intensity at which
the project was built. The intent of this policy is to prevent "ghost trips" from decreasing the amount
of roadway capacity a new project can rely on in obtaining a County traffic concurrency certificate.
Obiective 2.1.2: The City shall establish a network of streets that,provide multiple routes for
intra community trips and alternate routes for external travel so that neighborhood collector
streets can be maintained as two -lane streets, adequate ineress and egress is available for
police, fire and emergency evacuation, and no one neighborhood is unduly burdened by
providing more than its fair share of roadway capacity,
Policy 2.1.2.1.: The hierarchy of City streets and their functions shall be as follows-
City Collectors - (example Burns Road) collect and distribute traffic from neighborhood to
neighborhood throughout the City and provide back -up routes to the County
thoroughfare system, may be greater than two lane and are always public. The goal
is to have a network sufficient to maintain these roads at no more than four lanes,
Neighborhood Collectors - (example Holly Drive) collect and distribute traffic within a
Planned Unit Development or from limited access subdivisions, will be maintained
as low speed, two lane public roads suitable for fronting residential development,
institutional, or neighborhood commercial development.
Local Roads - (example Buttercup) all other City roads, may be public or private
TRANSPORTATION 2198 2 -10
EAR -Based Amendments
Policy 2.1.2.2f.: Minimum right -of -way requirements for new roadways shall be:
a) Arterial roadways - right -of -way based on County
and State standard;
b) City Collector roadways - 120' right -of -way;
C) Neighborhood Collector roadways - 80' right-of-way
de) Local roads - 60' right -of -way (swale drainage);
and 50' right -of -way (curb and gutter).
gd) Parkways - 300 -400' right -of -way.
Policy 2.1.2.3.: The City shall implement the Conceptual Thoroughfare Plan (Map O) to ensure
that there is an adequate network of City Collector streets to efficiently move traffic within the City
and serve as a backup system to the County thoroughfare roads . Actual alignments for the City
Collector roadways will be established as part of the development review process.
Policy 2.1.3.4.: The City shall modify its land development regulations to incorporate the minimum .
standards for Neighborhood Collector roadways to ensure that neighborhood collectors can remain
two -lane roadways through build -out of the County. Actual alignments for these roadways will be
established as part of the development review process.
Policy 2.1.23.5.: �y�cc« c 2. .2.: By jj1, Rights -of- -way needs shall continue to be formally
identified at the time of development approval and a priority schedule for acquisition or reservation
shall be established .
PolicPolio2.1.2. r__ _____in__ __________ �_1- _F... _. As a condition of plat approval the City
y A'vl a�LiUll ulb ilc�w�cuy 11g11Lw -vl -way, ,
shall require mandatory dedications of rights -of -way, easements, or fees in fien of when the required
ROW is not under the same ownership as the property being platted, as a Gviiuiiivn vi piaL ayyivvai.
Policy 2.1.2.73.: The City shall require that adequate roadway capacity, at the adopted level of
service standards, is or will be available when needed in order to serve new development.
Policy 2.1.2.8.: By 2000, the City shall complete a study to assess the need for impact fees to fund
local (city) roadway capital improvements.
Policv 2.1.2.9; The City shall continue to encourage the County. State and surrounding local
iurisdictions to elan for a new Intracoastal Waterway (ItYWW) crossing between PGA Boulevard
and Donald Ross Road,
Note to the reader: A study of ICWW crossing potential was initiated by the County in 1990. However, the RMS
exploratory engineering report of 5/10/90 did not identify a new ICWW crossing.
1 1 '1 D_. Van& 4r. T�a�.. _....... a..l [I7,.a....._.,._. !Tr[[1[T7X
V L/J{. �.Ll ♦\. a/.i.J.. "j 1 /JJ� Q 1V\.RL1Vll 1Vl a 11v1/ ill Ll LLbVast" -1 ♦♦ALL.1 V1Qy `iv♦• ♦1I L.1V00I11S
__.L .. �.. L..a__.___ ind" A TD .. _. 1.._...�-1 ...-1 T\..�..1 -3 7]--- T1- .7 -L._11 L,.:.7 ..�a7r...1
&VPM r�111v1c LP L.LVV L/Vli 1 VA LVY1L.�fllY NIlY iJV11LL111 i \VJ7 i\V(1Y Dllall "J 1Y &AAXC%A.
TRANSPORTATION 2198 2 -11
EAR -Based Amendments
«C,.LI w U: G.11 lGLL11J W «� , L.S. Y -4r-l--
uVlll L11G'p%JJJG.11 UVl Llly !V1:aL..Y . aUL "1%, .. �V,..L. L«LItiL.. , aLLL 1 G VOaLU,.aLG.. , «,] U: «s � 11V.. G,.L..L1 /
.....1:..a ..._.. __.L .. _..,...1 .] L.. «...i:a L_... ., ..
J Tf" 117117 LLL1JLLly L1V11J YV 11V VY VL.LIU Vy1lGlll V�' a lll.r YV JL%- TV V♦ yl VJJllIr:
D,.l_.._. 'W 1 '? '1
1 Vile, ir.1.J.lr.. L�' 1/ /L, Uly Vlly J..u.. yV- J�JV11JV1, VV1L11 VLIIl l LLLlyyLl.•U JU11JLL1G11V11J, K JLULL�' Lti
LLL,Ly1111111L+ U1G 11yyLL 1V1 V11G Vl 111V1G Vl Llll. 1V11V .Lg.
Ala......, ,, a:_.,. Tl�11711T
GLJ AXLy111LLLIVy 1\i VV VV G1VJJllls 1VGaL1V11J.
L\ l�.... _.7:. -.. a: ...- _ .:aL A_ !'1,.....a /3.... _.7 ...7: 1:. ,. -1
V f % rM"1U111"L1V11 VV 1L11 Llll t WV L V UGILU 1\..SLLL LLlll� 11AGLl
11V i.liJ LUL
\ TL.. . rV ,.a „« a..,. Fes .. '_.,..1.. a: ,.« ..F.. F.,,.,]
Gf 111G yl1GGL Vll UaL11G y11GU1LLL1V11 Vl a L1AGU Jpall
L_: .7,_„ ,.a Y'%___1 A T)___ 73--A --..7 aL.. T!'1117AT7 .. «.7 -i
VIILISG aL 1JVllalll 1 \VJJ 1 \Nal4 Lulu L11G LV VV VV , LL11u aL
V L11G1 G1VJJ111�, 1V GULl V113.
Objective 2.13.4.: In accordance with section 163.3202, F.S., the City shall maintain US
L__ 1AA1 7 __ • 7_ ____ -
uy 177JL auu ���;� wu�l ucvvaaai y, land development regulations for the provision of
motorized and non - motorized transportation.
Policy 2.13.4.1.: The City shall prohibit on -street parking on all arterial, City and Neighborhood
collector roads.
Policy 2.1.34.2.: $y-1992, tThe City shall continue its efforts ii-LitiaLC a %vi,l to
�
establish city -wide continuity of bikeways, particularly between major sources of and destinations
for vehicle trips gcacrat6is au U-1 aLLLa\ toia in the City.
Policy 2.1.34.3.: The City shall review all proposed development for its accommodation of bicycle
- a---'- -- - t' -- --- - r- �'-- -- r ^ -t'- -- "1 1 Art
an pedestrian traffic needs [LL1U UGLG1111111G GV111y11a11GG YViL11 L11G lJLILUlJLLro VL L V11G�' L. l.`T.L.
Objective 2.1.45.: The Iu avc.-j, uauce w: u saaI 1U3,32U2, .0., tali City shall rcviEVV-by-19}t;
auu ici:au wuviu ixecessaty, maintain and development regulations which set -to include
requirements for safety and aesthetics in the transportation system.
Policy 2.14.5.1.: The City shall continue to enforce its adopted design standards
which, to al -- = a l'___]Ll_ _1 L__•-__a_ '1_ -- -- 1_'_1_ 1 - I
LL1G la-Max-11-J-51 1U111 GAlG11L LGaJ1 V1G, clua111aLG Vl minimize �oadway UGJ1g11J VY111G11 1Gau
to hazardous conditions -by:
a) Requiring the provision of adequate storage and
weaving areas;
b) Providing turn lanes with adequate storage;
C) Limiting direct access from residential driveways
and local roads onto high -speed traffic lanes;
d) Reducing conflicts between roadway and pedestrian
or rail traffic;
e) Providing adequate capacity for emergency evacuation;
TRANSPORTATION 2198 2 -12
EAR -Based Amendments
f) Providing standard signing and marking for roadways,
bikeways, sidewalks, and intersections;
g) Controlling access between dissimilar land uses; a«u
h) Regulating the length of cul- de- sacs;and
3 Road drainage.
Objective 2.15.6.: To continue coordinating rans oration Tz a�� �;� �u.at,�u planning
g p Tannin���
be com din with the future land uses shown on the Future Land Use Map of this plan, the
FDOT Five Year Transportation Plan, plans of neighboring jurisdictions, and Palm Beach
County transportation and future land use plans.
Policy 2.1.56.1.: The City shall review subsequent versions of the FDOT Five Year Transportation
Plan and Palm Beach County Five -Year Road Improvement Program in order to update or modify
this element, if necessary.
Policy 2.1.56.2.: The City shall review for compatibility with this element, the transportations
cjr�u1a«c,i-. plans and programs of the unincorporated County and neighboring municipalities as they
are amended in the future.
Policy 2.1.5.3.: The City shall coordinate with State and County traffic agencies to change the
classification of Holly Drive on plans and models to that of a neighborhood collector.
Objective 2.1.6.: To continue to plan for parkways, pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
Policy 2.1.6.1.: ��� �c« . ; .: The City shall require that specific corridors be constructed as
parkway facilities.
Policy 2.1.6.27.1.: The parkways are shown on Maps A and I and include the following facilities
�iiait v%, ivaiii%am%,u as yainway.5.
1) PGA Boulevard from Beeline Highway to Central Boulevard.
2) Central Boulevard from PGA Boulevard to Donald Ross Road.
3) Donald Ross Road from Prosperity Farms Road westward to the Palm Beach
Gardens city limits.
4) Beeline Highway from PGA Boulevard to the Caloosa subdivision.
5) Hood Road from Prosperity Farms Road Cci-Atral Bouicvaid to a future North -South
Artery west of Florida's Turnpike.
6) Future North -South Artery west of Florida's Turnpike.
7) Future East -West Artery north of PGA Boulevard and south of Hood Road.
Policy 2.1.6.37.2.: The parkways shall include pedestrian ways within the additional rights -of -way.
Policy 2.1.6.4.7.3.: The designated rights -of -way for parkways shall be 300 -400 feet.
TRANSPORTATION 2198 2 -13
EAR -Based Amendments
Objective 2.1.7$.: The City shall encourage the use of public transit, bicycle, and pedestrian
paths al'ti uaLlve i iVucJ c, Ll Q1lJjJV1 LQLLVLL within City its boundaries and in conjunction with
surrounding municipalities through use of the Parkway System and support of Palm Tran and
Tri -Rail.
Policy 2.1.7$.1.: The City shall continue to require L11L V U611 L11%, appiu v ai yivic,i Uhat new
developments to construct bicycle and pedestrian ways within and on roadways adjacent to those
developments and to identify future on -site centralized transit pick -up /drop -off points.
r_12 --- 1 1 in _ n__ 1lVlC t -- !"�•�- _7__17 _--- _ --_ -- 1 -- a a_t 1___ -il_ _1`1_x_ --_1_ -"--t - - _t- _a-' --- _
1 V1LLG,' !r•1.V•!r.• 1-).' 177-1, U1G t,l L.' 3110.11 111G1%1a3G U1G LVLaJL 1G11rLLI Vi V1G�'G1G anu l.JGLLG3L11Q11 way3,
wlilllll u1G l.liy, Vy JV F%,LGGIIL UV14 GAl3L11g.
Policy 2.1.7.2.0..: The City shall continue to provide PalmCloTran, the local transit authority, with
employment and development activity on projects within the City in order to identify potential
sources of and destinations for people using transit a uu; LVis CUIU -- -_ or; and assist them in the
extension of transit service in the City as ridership need is identified.
Policy 2.1.7.3.: The City shall coordinate efforts with Palm -Tran to increase public awareness of
the expanded Palm -Tran service through the following efforts
1. Work with identified area attractors (examples: Gardens Mall, Government Center
libraries) to produce public information displays on how to access the attractors by
Palm -Tran.
2. Provide displays in all City offices and parks indicating the location and stop number
of the closest Palm -Tran stop.
3. Include information on the location and number of the closest Palm -Tran stop in
advertisement of all City sponsored public events.
Policy 2.1.7.$.4.: The By 1995,the City shall continue to participate with the MPO in a study of
the feasibility of a semi - local, independent shuttle or transit system within the north county area City.
Policy 2.1.7.$:5.: The City shall continue to make uu«aL� a 3LU Ly iii aut.,u1ua %,%, wiLU i viit. -y 2.1.4.2.
,Ll1vus aLIU �,VOLs V;: p1VV1U,iir, continuity between pedestrian paths in the older
portions of the City a priority in the Capital Improvement Element.
Policy 2.1.7.$:6.: The City shall continue to require u Lii % iai
parkway system improvements s aad Tra�-way,, as defined in the Future Land
Use Element of this Comprehensive Plan, to be introduced into newly developed areas to incor_norate
have pedestrian ways iiiz,vipviaLlwu UILV L11%,111.
Policy 2.1.7.$.7.: The City shall continue to require, U L V Ur uic uv v civpiu�iiL aypi v v ai pivvv��, uiai
elements of the parkway system to connect to existing road facilities aa—' Lv pTvpvD�;;u
i cuca uiau/i ,4atc i iaiiway3 so that a continuous pedestrian system occurs.
TRANSPORTATION 2198 2 -14
EAR -Based Amendments
Policy 2.1.7.8.: The City shall coordinate with the Town of Jupiter in an effort to identify
appropriate bike trail linkages between the PBCC campus in Palm Beach Gardens and the proposed
Florida Atlantic University campus in the Abacoa development in the Town of Jupiter.
Policy 2.1.7.9.: The City shall support efforts to extend the Tri- County Commuter Rail on the FEC
railroad track.
TRANSPORTATION 2198 2 -15
EAR -Based Amendments
HOUSING ELEMENT
Goals. Obiectives and Policies
GOAL 3.1.: THE PROVISION OF AN ADEQUATE MIX OF SAFE AND SANITARY
HOUSING WHICH MEETS THE NEEDS OF EXISTING AND FUTURE PALM BEACH
GARDENS' RESIDENTS.
Objective 3.1.1.: The City shall assist the private sector to provide housing of the various
types, sizes, and costs to meet the housing needs of all existing and anticipated populations
of the City. Toward this objective, the City shall maintain 21ew aiiu i E ise , ;e
necessary, land development regulations, consistent with Section 163.3202 (1), F.S., to
facilitate public and private sector cooperation in the housing delivery system.
Policy 3.1.1.1.: The City shall continue to provide information, technical assistance, and
incentives to the private sector to maintain a housing production capacity sufficient to meet the
required projected demand.
Policy 3.1.1.2.: When necessary, the City shall develop public- private sector partnerships to
improve the efficiency and expand the capacity of the housing delivery system.
Policy 3.1.1.3.: The City shall r: —1cw ensure proposed ordinances, codes, regulations, and
changes to the permitting process do not create voi ui%-, puiYvSi, of %--1h - iaiiiig excessive
requirements, and the Citv shall continue to amending or adding other requirements in order to
maintain or increase private sector participation in meeting the housing needs, while continuing
to insure the health, safety, and welfare of the residents.
Policy 3.1.1.4.: The City shall maintain development regulations which include site selection
criteria for the location of housing which shall consider accessibility, convenience, and
infrastructure availability.
Objective 3.1.2.: Continue to identify .and assess any substandard units located within the
City limits.
Policy 3.1.2.1.: The City shall continue code enforcement activities through inspections of the
housing stock, and institute special concentrated code enforcement activities where warranted.
Policy 3.1.2.2.: The City shall assist neighborhood improvement projects by providing code
enforcement assistance, encouraging neighborhood self -help, removing blighting influences, and
concentrating capital and /or operating budget improvements in such neighborhoods.
HOUSING 1/98 3 -1
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
Objective 3.1.3.: By continuing to designatging adequate sites with appropriate land use and
density on the Future Land Use Map, the City shall ensure that adequate supply of land exists
in the City for the private sector to provide for the housing needs of the very low, low and
moderate income families and the elderly.
Policy 3.1.3.1.: The City shall ainu zciie maintain an appropriate amount of land
designated for high density residential use to provide for 12 to 15 units per acre to facilitate the
construction of housing for low and moderate income families.
Policy 3.1.3.2.: Designation of high density residential areas intended for the construction of
affordable housing in the City shall take into consideration the proximity of such areas to major
employment centers.
Policy 3.1.3.3.: .. � lh-un vruc yca; um ule, auupLivri ;,f u�c Cc��LYrchei1z;v%' 1ar�, the City shall
ucvcllop s cc-i c maintain and continue to evaluate additional incentives to encourage the
production of housing for persons with special housing needs including the elderly, the
handicapped, and those in need of affordable housing.
Policy 3.1.3.4.: The City shall reprise maintain development regulations in accordance with
Section _163.3202 (1), F.S., to include site selection criteria for the location of housing for the
elderly, which shall consider accessibility, convenience and infrastructure availability.
Policy 3.1.3.5: The City shall continue to provide a voluntary density bonus program for
Planned Community Districts (PCDs), Planned Unit Developments (PUD)s and other large
developments that set aside a certain percentage of units for very low, and low income families.
Alternatively, residential development participating in the program may build affordable housing
off -site. Off -site development shall be at the direction of the City Council.
The voluntary density bonus program wound also allows for the voluntary payment by residential,
commercial and industrial development in exchange for greater density or intensity in specific
projects. The criteria for and amount of the voluntary payment shall be established by the City
Council. However, in no event shall this amount be less than the cost of producing these units.
This payment in lieu of housing production shall be made into the County Housing Trust Fund.
For off -site development, it shall be at the direction of the City, so long as the location is
convenient and proximate to the need.
Development that is eligible for the voluntary density bonus must:
o demonstrate its ability to meet all concurrency requirements at the level of impact
HOUSING 1/98 3 -2
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
calculated at the "bonus" density or intensity; and
o demonstrate proximity to public transportation and employment opportunities; and
o legally ensure that the units remain affordable, in perpetuity, to households which, by
definition, meet the income guidelines for very low, and low income.
o be found consistent by the City Manager or his designee, for consistency with this policy.
The City Council shall be responsible for recommending the maximum density /intensity allowed
under this program.
Policy 3.1.3.6: .J:t �i« ui, wi� an�c fruviucu uy C �aY«r �5 _Y. .J2�2i1), F.S., tThe Land
Development Regulations shall continue be - amended to allow manufactured and modular structures
and buildings in all residential zoning districts.
Policy 3.1.3.7: With recommendation of the City Council, the County's Commission on
Affordable Housing 11�u�1 ��� 1 L Fuiiu, or its successor, may be utilized for the payment of
impact fees for newly constructed housing units for very low- and low- income families, and for
the amortization of impact fee payments for newly constructed housing units for moderate - income
TL_ T�__a i unu Payments shall be made directly to the
amities. � «� 11VUJ111� i i uJ� i uiiu �iiaii iiian�, Y y y
appropriate Impact Fee Trust Funds when financing such impact fee payments.
Policy 3.1.3.8: `.IU11-1 u1- L1_1_, CU_A;, YLVVIUV u uy Cj aY«r 1"^ 202, F.S., tThe City shall
amend maintain its Land Development Regulations to permit the placement of individual mobile
or manufactured homes and conventionally built residences within single- family and multiple -
family residential districts provided that the homes: (1) comply with all City building,
construction, design and housing codes, hurricane velocity regulations and U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development body and frame construction requirements as applied to
Hurricane Resistive Design Standards; and (2) be subject to any Council or staff reviews as
provided in the City of Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances. The structural capabilities of
homes located within the City shall be verified by a Florida Registered Professional Engineer.
The engineer shall certify that said home has the structural capacity to withstand hurricane force
winds as prescribed for the geographical area as designated in the Standard Building Code.
HOUSING 1/98 3 -3
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
Objective 3.1.4.: The City shall provide for adequate .sites for group homes and mobile
homes to ensure that the needs of persons requiring such housing are met.
Policy 3.1.4.1.: By- 992, tThe City shall estabfis maintain non- discriminatory standards and
criteria in the Land Development Regulations addressing the location of group homes and foster
care facilities consistent with Chapter 419, Florida Statutes.
Policy 3.1.4.2.: The City shall caunu n%-.,Rd, as ��cccs�a�y, maintain the zoning code so that
different classes of group homes are permitted in residential neighborhoods of different types, and
that no residential neighborhood is closed to such facilities.
Policy 3.1.4.3.: The City shall provide for other community -based residential care facilities
needed to serve group homes and the clients of other programs, located at convenient, adequate,
and non - isolated sites within the residential or publichnstitutional areas of the City. Adult
Congregate Living Facilities (ACLFs) shall be permitted to have up to 15.0 units per acre in the
Residential High future land use designation in conjunction with a Planned Unit Development or
a Planned Community Development except in Coastal High Hazard Areas that are the Category
1 Hurricane Evacuation Zones.
Policy 3.1.4.4.: The City, shall allow mobile home development as an acceptable use in the
"Mixed Use" areas as shown on the Future Land Use Map of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Objective 3.1.5.: Through continued monitoring and enforcement of building and housing
codes, the City shall strive to conserve and extend the useful life of the existing housing stock
and stabilization of older neighborhoods.
Policy 3.1.5.1.: The City shall continue to enforce the City's housing and health codes and
standards relating to the care and maintenance of residential structures and facilities so as to
conserve the existing housing stock and improve the quality of housing and neighborhood
environment.
Policy 3.1.5.2.: The City shall continue to schedule and concentrate on public infrastructures and
supporting facilities and services to upgrade the quality of.existing neighborhoods.
Policy 3.1.5.3.: The City shall continue to encourage property owners to increase private
reinvestment in housing by providing information, technical assistance programs, and incentives.
Policv 3.1.5.4.: Priorities for structural and aesthetic improvements to existing housing shall
be determined through community involvement in conjunction with the Neighborhood Initiative
Task Force,
HOUSING 1/98 3 -4
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
Obiective 3.1.6.: The Citv shall continue to investigate housing implementation programs and
other means to ensure affordable housing is provided to residents of all income ranges,
Policv 3.1.6.1: The Citv shall continue to encourage the private sector to provide housing in a
range of prices. including those affordable to the very low and low income groups, through further
streamlinine of the review process. promoting the density bonus program, and providing flexible
land development code provisions.
Policv 3.1.6.2,; By 2003, the Citv shall update housing needs projections in the support document
based on the 2000 Census. and shall investigate alternative means of ensuring housing affordable
to low and very low income groups such as entering into an interlocal agreement with a
neighboring iurisdiction.
Policv 3.1.6.3.: The City shall increase its support and reliance on the Commission on Affordable
Housing as the entity for promoting affordable housing and recommending incentives for the
development of new affordable units,
Policy 3.1.6.4.: The City shall continue to be party of Interlocal Cooperation Agreements with
Palm Beach County for the nurooses of implementing Community Development Block Grant,
Home Investment Partnerships Program. and other entitlement funds or program income activities,
as outlined in the Consolidated Plan,
Policv 3.1.6.5: By 1999. the City shall initiate a review of the Land Development Regulations to
determine whether there are further op_ portunities to streamline the review and permitting process
for affordable housing.
HOUSING 1/98 3 -5
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT
Goals. Objectives and Policies
SANITARYSEWER
GOAL 4.A.1.: PROVIDE ADEQUATE CENTRAL SANITARY SEWAGE FACILITIES
FOR RESIDENTS AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY.
Objective 4:A.1.1.: The City will require all submittals for development, to obtain a statement
of available capacity from Seacoast prior to site -plan approval. The issuance of a building permit
will require an executed developer agreement with Seacoast and a certificate of occupancy will not
be issued prior to acceptance by Seacoast of the sanitary sewer facilities, which service the
building.
Policy 4.A.1.1.1.: The City will supply the Seacoast Utility Authority with -tm data from this
Comprehensive Plan and site specific development approvals to use to forecast capacity
,f will. L_ ['______a TTa77:a__ A__aL _�:+
requirements a11LL W 111 sublillL ull. 1V1L L.aStS LV Lw- UL.aL.VaJL V Lllll�' 11LLlilVl lty.
Policy 4.A.1.1.2.: The City will document any moratoriums caused by insufficient or inadequate
treatment /disposal capacity.
Policy 4.A.1.1.3.: The City shall adopt an average annual daily sanitary sewage flow level of
service standard of 107 38 gallons per City resident per day, until such time as it is revised by the
Seacoast Utility Authority. This shall serve as the level of service standard for the urban area.
The rural area shall utilize septic tanks, unless alternative service provision is approved by the
Citv Council consistent with Policv 9.1.4.2.(a) -(d).
Policy 4.A.1.1.4.: The City shall adopt a peak month, average day sanitary sewage flow level
of service standard of 118 91 gallons per City resident per day, until such time as it is revised by
the Seacoast Utility Authority.
Policy 4.A.1.1.5.: The City shall adopt a minimum sanitary sewage treatment plant capacity level
of service standard of 118 91 gallons per City resident per day, until such time as it is revised by
the Seacoast Utility Authority.
Policv 4.A.1.1.6: The Citv shall coordinate with Seacoast Utility Authority to adjust sanitary
sewer service provision plans and to establish policies preventing urban sprawl, consistent with
the Urban Growth Boundary concept,
INFRASTRUCTURE 12/97 4 -1
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
Objective 4.A.1.2.: By-1995—,t The City, in coniunction with the Seacoast Utility Authority
and Palm Beach County Public Health Department, will continue to monitor have identified
residences and other facilities identified as using septic tanks within the City.
A A 1 q 1 _ TL- !'�:1.._ '_ •�• ____,L L_ [1______a TTa_ /:ti_ A__,L__:a_. L1__L __ L:..1
1 UM-J 'l.tf. 1.lr.1.. 1111, L.1Ly, 1111rvi1ju111.L1V11 Wlul LmL U1,a%,VQJL %_)tnny !'1uu1V11Ly, L,JLa Vllall W111L.11
a11,a3 aN 11VL air W1,1GU anu Wllll,ll la%,111L1L:5 a1L, 11VL L,V1ll1L,L,L1,LL LV GA1JL111r, 0L,WL,1 J.
Policy 4.A.1.2.1-.2.: The City shall direct all inquiries for new septic tank installation to the
LJli""' DESE (Palm Beach Health Department Uiui). All malfunctions of existing septic tanks
will be reported to the Health Department UILUL for information and enforcement of corrective ac-
tion.
Policy 4.A.1.2.2.3•: The City, :aL. 1L_ [4- ___ - -1 TTa_1'a__ A__a--- :1__ b 1QQ Q will
1111,V11JU11L,11V11 wiLul un, �JGa1,VaJL VL111Ly r-XUU1V11Ly _ ///
develop policies for an assessment program and make it available as an option for financing the
provision of--a sewer service Y1ain w Yry V iuc to areas not in compliance with state statutes.
Policy 4.A.1.2.3,4:: The use of innovative technology, such as septic tank effluent pump (STEP)
systems will be considered on their technical and functional merit.
Policv
_ 4.A.1.2.4.4. • ^LJ: G _L1vG 4.A.1.3.: X995 -, _ The Ci ty will continue regulations that
prohibit not approy new development using septic tanks on lots that do not comply with the size
set forth in state statutes.
T..1!..__ A A 1 9 1 _ -_-__ L_ .L:., ,.1___. _1_11 L_ _-A
1 v1l% -,y '*.CX.1.J.1.. VL LLl11a11L,L,J LV a1,m%,vL, ull, VVJ%,%,LlVG Jllall V1, 1IivmuiraLVu allu auUPL%,U.
SOLID WASTE
GOAL 4.B.1.: PROVIDE ACCESS TO SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL
FACILITIES FOR THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS THROUGH THE
PLANNING PERIOD OF THE YEAR 2015 20055.
Objective 4.B.1.1.: By 1991, the The City will have continue to acquire and compiled the
solid waste background data to quantify solid waste generation rates and types by land use
and population. Data will be made available to the Solid Waste Authority VIVA" ;C.
Policy 4.B.1.1.1.: The minimum level of service for the City, as recommended by the SWA is
as follows:
INFRASTRUCTURE 12/97 4 -2
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
1. Provide biweekly residential collection of garbage. in the urban area.
2. Provide bulky trash collection once every two weeks. in the urban area.
3. Provide weekly collection of commercial business waste.
4. Require subscription for collection service to residences and especially commercial
businesses.
5. Provide regulations to enforce the utilization of tarps to cover trash loads.
Objective 4.B.1.2.: The City shall coo_erate and assist the Solid Waste Authority in the
im_ulementation of its Master Plan and waste reduction goals. By '1»2, thk, Clty M.a have
UGTGIV+GU AV11U i7asLG 111al1arG111G11L -1---
1Q11J 111 L,V11•LL11L.L1V11 TTllll L 1G L7TT Il, Q1IU L11G LG1111J �Jl LhG
Y Y �J
T1._�! -3_ ['�._1!J TT7__A_ w,r__�.____�_�A __� T7_.l__W .. T_�___A!_� A ..A ..B 1A00 TL_ _l._ -- ---!Ill ! _1__A.
X 1Vlllla L7V1lU TT a3LG 1/'lallag'G111G11L al1LL ♦ V111111G 1 \GULLL.L1V11 t1L,L Vl 1700. 1116 1Jla11J W111 ult -luUG
1GTGla Vl JGl T1L,G al1Ll allllU TTa3LG TV1LLL11G 1GULLL,L1V11 G11Vl La U,' L11G \dLJ'.
TL_ 1�!__ _1L_11 -'l!_ 11L_ J_a_ C--- A T7 7 1 __,1 _.1_a _�_�___ _l.L
111G 1..1Ly Jllall UL111GL, u1L: uaLa 110111 Vup,"ivi, - rdx.I.I. allu J711VL 3LUU1L.a V1 L11%,
0117 A _L7:_L aL_ l___.:L:l.a__ __.7 _L ... _l __1:_7
0 TT A LV G3LaV11011 U1L. 1G0.a1u111Ly ailU 1.VaLa V1 aVU1L.L. a,- palaL1V11 VI aVILU WaaLG.
Policy 4.B.1.2112.: The Solid Waste Authority shall implement recycling and reduction programs
necessary to meet at least the 30% level, as directed by State law Uy January 1, 1993, and the
Authority shall continue to expand its recycling and reduction programs to maximize reduction.
Policy 4.B.1.2.23.: The City shall continue to coordinate and cooperate with the Palm Beach
County Solid Waste Authority in up- dating and implementing the county -wide Solid Waste Master
Plan. To this end, the City puts special emphasis on the development of a recycling program to
include public education and voluntary separation by residents of recyclables and disposables. A
formal contract for curb -side collection by the Solid Waste Authority for recyclables has already
been entered into.
GOAL 4.B.2.: DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGE-
MENT PLAN FOR THE CITY.
Objective 4.B.2.1.: By 1999 4992, the City, lr1 \,Vr1J l -&II'- IVr1 TVIL h �TT:7h, M K I V,aaurc Gast
_7 AL_ T�1W T___L J'v ___�A__ TT_�IAL TT_-d _ 1___�
1 \Gg1V11Q1 1 lalillllli I.V LLl1L,11, al1LL L11G 1 allll LGal,ll I..VUlILy liGalLll J.11L, will have de;ellopeu
incorporated the countvwide Emereencv Management Plan arl emuergziicy r es cixse iarl into
the Palm Beach Gardens hurricane and disaster _plan lr1 uarli,E vri% h % hE SuYUrf:;rlu
A _A_ _ ___3 A _A ZO A T A \ _B 1 AaL T!11- TTY AA /"ITT T_YA 9r7A
21LIM 11U111G11LJ allU 1\GL1L1L11V11J.aL1V11 CfL,L kL7t�l \t1), Vl 1700, 1 ALM 1119 '4V Vl' 1\ 1 al L J / V.
INFRASTRUCTURE 12/97 4 -3
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
Policy 4.B.2.1.1.: The City shall continue to participate in the Northern Area Mutual Aid
Consortium (NAMAC) and offer hazardous- materials response and mutual aid to the surrounding
o u o vy rx, Lu,_ ii%a�ui- va3L i\%rlvilai iiaiuuilcommunities. ia a wiu icYic3a iiiiv f ic �
!'1
�__�__7 aL_ il_1-_ T)._ -_L /"�__4�. TT --I,L TT-!, --A L_ �_ t_.a_.7 WL_ _r 'L-
t.vuncll, LL1G i allll 1JbaLd1 L.vu11Ly 11ca1L11 ULM, allu L11L. 1crulaLGu u1GL11UV1J 01 Lllc L/uaiRCS3
wliuiiuiuiy Lv w, vkavp a %,uumy -w lu%, LLaL.aluvua. 111a1L.11a1J 111a11ar,L.111c11L 1Jlall.
Policy 4.B.2.1.2.: The City shall continue to utilize data updates from SWA and the DEPR, along
with building permits and occupational license data collected by the City to identify the location
of hazardous materials or hazardous wastes.
Objective 4.B.2.2.: By 2000 4995, the City shall have codified the hazardous materials
management plan for the City in accordance with Objective 4.11.2.1. above.
Policy 4.B.2.2.1.: The plan shall include elements for protection of wellfields and watersheds.
Policy 4.B.2.2.2.: The plan shall include provisions for spill prevention control and
countermeasures (SPCC) plans at regulated business.
Policy 4.B.2.2.3.: The plan shall include provisions for the periede annual inspection by fire
Inspectors cVLLL. l.luVlL,.c111b11L V111L.G1 J, L11L. 11 L,LiuG11L.y Of Wllll.11 1J lV VC, a llllllllllulll Vl V111.L. cV%rly
three months.
STORMWATERF MANAGEMENT
GOAL 4.C.1: PROVIDE ADEQUATE CITY -WIDE DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT FOR ALL PROPERTY IN THE City.
Objective 4.C.1.1: By 2000 4993 the City, in conjunction with SFWMD, NPBC v % D wid
Pale, ;ucac %Aviiaty, will have completed the City of Palm Beach Gardens Surface Water
Management Plan.
Policy 4.C.1.1.1: The City, through its consultants and staff, will establish the drainage facility
improvements needed within the City and the priority thereof.
Policy 4.C.1.1.2: The City will continue to pursue actions and recommendations that would result
L rc�vl�u�lcrlu ulat improvements to SFWMD structure S-44 and Canal C -17 to more adequately
meet flood control level of service tic inauc a- JVva aS possible.
Policy 4.C.1.1.3: The level of service standard (LOS) for new development will be to have the
finished floor above the flooding from a 100 -year. 3 -day storm with zero discharge, including
INFRASTRUCTURE 12/97 4 -4
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
conveyance and retention/detention designed for a 3 day /25 -year storm for developments greater
than or equal to ten (10) acres or for a 1 day /25 -year storm for developments less than ten (10)
acres in size. Additionally, the LOS for new development shall require that off -site discharges
are limited to historic (predevelopment) discharges and retention/detention requirements shall be
the first 1" of run -off or 2.5 inches x the percent of impervious area for the project, whichever is
greater, if wet storage is utilized and 75% of wet detention, if dry storage is utilized "
it __ All of the above shall be in accordance with SFWMD Rules and
ii ui,y oivia��. i� u�uic,cu.
Regulations, Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) Applications Volume
; r', XiQiagcili�il� a��u ���ragc �f Sup acs �.'Q�el�. The LOS for redevelopment shall conform with
the requirements for new development. The minimum LOS for existing development shall be a
surface water management system that - protects existing finished floor elevations from flooding
during a 1- day / 100 -year storm."
Policy 4.C.1.1.4: The surface water management plan will prescribe methods of increasing or
maintaining groundwater recharge.
INFRASTRUCTURE 12/97 4 -5
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
Objective 4.C.1.2: By the year 2010 2005, the City will have implemented the
recommendations of the Surface Water Management Plan. In the interim, the City will
continue to give guidelines and review applications for development approval on the basis of
the City of Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances and the South Florida Water
Management District, Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Permit (ERP)
IF
pplications Vu
ll11G IL VI, l�l
♦ culcaSG1l1GILL AllU 176V1 Qr,C Vl L7U11QC.G ♦ 1 aLUI A. In each case a
proposed project will need to demonstrate the availability of positive legal outfall for the off
site discharge of stormwater and the hydraulic capability thereof.
Policy 4.C.1.2.1: New development within the City shall make all improvements to the off -site
surface water management system(s) to adequately store and /or convey any additional stormwater
discharges.
Policv 4.C.1.2.2.: The City will continue to coordinate. cooperate and implement, in conjunction
with NPBCID and SFWMD, the results of a study on the events of the October, 1995 floods and
develop recommendations to prevent similar flooding situations from occurring in the future.
Obiective 4.C.1.3.: The Citv shall adopt stormwater duality standards consistent with state
water policy established in Florida Administrative Code 62- 40.432(1) -(4). South Florida.
Water Management District criteria pursuant to ERP Rules . and the Citv shall achieve the
`effective Drohibition' and `maximum extent _practicable' standgrds:from Section 402(P) (3)(B)
of the Fedcral Clean Air Act,
Policv 4.C.1.3.1.: By 1999. the City shall develop a Stormwater Management Program which,
achieves overall water duality standards consistent with applicable, federal, state and regional rules
and regulations. This program shall include pollution prevention measures. treatment or removal
techniaues. stormwater monitoring. use of legal authority. and other appropriate means to control
the aualitv of stormwater discharged from the municipal separate storm sewer system.
Policv 4.C.1.3.2; The Stormwater Management Program shall include controls necessary to
effectively prohibit the discharge of non - stormwater into municipal separate storm $ewers, and
reduce the discharge of _pollutants from the municipal separate storm sewer to the maximum extent
practicable,
Policv 4.C.1.3.3; Water aualitv standards within surface water management system$ shall be
consistent with water duality criteria set forth in SFWMD rules governing the issuance of
Environmental Resource Permits,
INFRASTRUCTURE 12/97 4 -6
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
GOAL 4.D.1.: THE PROVISION OF A SAFE, HEALTHY AND DEPENDABLE POTABLE
WATER SUPPLY TO ALL RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES IN THE CITY.
Objective 4.D.1.1.: The potable water facilities levels of service standards established in this
element shall be maintained throughout the City, until such time as they are revised by the
Seacoast Utility Authority.
Policy 4.D.1.1.1.: The City shall adopt an average annual daily potable water consumption level
of service standard of 19192 gallons per City resident per day. 'This shall serve as the level of
service standard for the urban area, The rural area shall utilize water wells, unless alternative
service provision is approved by the Citv Council consistent with Policy 9.1.4.2.(a) -(d).
Policy 4.D.1.1.2.: The City shall adopt a peak 24 -hour potable water consumption level of
service standard of 258 130' gallons per City resident per day.
Policy 4.D.1.1.3.: The City shall adopt a minimum potable water treatment plant capacity level
of service standard of 25$ 1308 gallons per City resident per day.
Policy 4.D.1.1.4.: The City shall adopt a minimum potable water storage capacity level of service
standard of 34.4 gallons per City resident per day.
Policy 4.D.1.1.5. The City shall adopt a minimum water pressure level of service standard of 20
pounds per square inch.
Policy 4.D.1.1.6.: The City shall not approve development permits which, if approved, would
cause potable water facilities servicing the City to operate at levels below the levels of service
standards established in Policies 4.D.1.1.1.- 4.D.1.1.5. of this element.
Policv 4.D.1.1.7: The City coordinate with Seacoast Utility Authority to adjust potable water
service provision plans and to establish policies preventing urban sprawl, consistent with the,
Urban Growth Boundary concept
INFRASTRUCTURE 12/97 4 -7
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
Objective 4.D.1.2.: In accordance with section 163.3202, F.S., the City, 141 1.vrlJuila,ilvrl Wii i
via the Seacoast Utility Authority, will have a cross - connection control program.
Policy 4.D.1.2.1.: T__L1__Y L_77 L_ :_ L TlT'Tl _1_ /7L __�_� GGA
Li110.V1111 V1u111a111rGJ Jllall VV 111 al%.,vLua111.G WiLn Lliil\ lull. l.11a�J Ll.l 1 / -JJV,
T'A t" __1 L_ _ __:__ _a. __1_a'_._ C aL_ n__.____ TT -*I-*,-- A__aL_-_
anu llll. JG1Vl%rb JLLJJLuaLLV11J Vl ulb Jl.al.Va5t Vt111Ly r_..' —vi lty The City. through its
membership in the Seacoast Utility Authority (SUA) consortium, will encourage SUA to continue
its acgressive cross - connection procram.
T)..1!_ -_ A T 1 1% �1 _ /".:a__ __A_ _-Z ------- _CC:__�_ _ _.1/ _JW:_:_a_ aL_
1 VllV.y �.JJ.l.lr.f�.. t.1Ly I.VLLIr G111V11rG111Gl11 VL11l.G1J WILL auninuama'uK, viumall%XkJf.
Objective 4.D.1.3.: By 1992 The City, in ion will continue to coordinate with
Seacoast Utility Authority and the Palm Beach County Department of Environmental
Resource Management, w:::: aye luerl« ed in the indentification of existing and future
We
•11
le dS and w111 11QTG 111V 11111GLL dlr..d modify he City will proposed land uses to protect the
_ _
wellfields.
Policy 4.D.1.3.1.: As new wellfields are identified. land uses will be evaluated and, if
incompatibility is determined, C compatible land uses or restrictions on activities will be identified
in future Comprehensive Plan amendments.
Objective 4.D.1.4.: By 995 -t The City will continue to monitor !County Health Department
reports regardinLy l ma ave &Ler 11GLL the facilities using on -site domestic wells that do not
comply with state statutes and emu: �a.r, uv.2�6ped the City will assist the Health Department
and Seacoast Utilitv Authority implement a plan to provide approved water supplies to these
parcels of non - compliance.
Policy 4.D.1.4.1.: The potential for well contamination will be examined as the City County
Health Department determines who is using on -site domestic wells that do not comply with state
statutes. ThiJ iJlall lV by 177J WILL VG UL VL.1VF%,U Uy Jlaff WILLI Ullc, assistancc of a
eonsultant.
Policy 4.D.1.4.2.: The City will crlact ail oiuirlailCc encouarge. via its status as a member of the
SUA consortium. that the SUA adopt a policy requiring connection to an approved public water
supply within ninety (90) days of that supply being available.
INFRASTRUCTURE 12/97 4 -8
EAR - BASED AMENDMENT
Objective 4.D.1.5.: The City shall establish procedures to coordinate the extension and
increase in the capacity of potable water facilities to meet future needs.
Policy 4.D.1.5.1.: The City will require all submittals for development to obtain a statement of
available capacity from Seacoast Utilities prior to site plan approval.
Policy 4.D.1.5.2.: The City will not issue a building permit in the urban area without an
executed agreement for service between the developer and Seacoast Utility Authority. or alternate
trovider.
Policy 4.D.1.5.3.: The City will not issue a certificate of occupancy in the urban area without
written acceptance of the water facilities by Seacoast Utility Authority, or alternate provider.
GOAL 4.D.2.: THE CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION OF PUBLIC DRINKING
WATER SUPPLIES.
Objective 4.D.2.1.: By 199rt The City will .a.� :l�lp,.�l�l��,LVU all Wrui�laace continue to
encourage new development and redevelopment to reduce the per capita consumption of
drinking water 'LP,-Y- v c �iu a La,a.V.0 v.11 1 tuL1, As rN%�U 1lG.._V_U;_1 1 v1 Ovivi• %,v VaLa1J11!a_1L1G.. U 1 Luy LO3,_a %.VaaL l
Utilities in 1987 and encourage the switch to water conserving plumbing fixtures in existing
structures through education of the consumer.
Policy 4.D.2.1.1.: The City shall continue to require water conserving plumbing fixtures in new
construction and through its land development regulations s mall jL%.,via%, L11, YiulMunir cvu% vy July
l 19911 : 1_�_�a tL_
Vl 177G LV u11�J1Glll,lll u1G
Policy 4.D.2.1.2.: The City shall discourage the use of potable water and encourage reclaimed
water for irrigation in new developments through the review process and will work with the
regional utility to define methods to discourage potable use for irrigation in existing developments.
Objective 4.D.2.2.: By 1995, The City. as a member of the SUA consortium, shall
encourage the utility to continue tG sllilall evaluate the feasibility of implementing various
alternative water treatment and reuse systems.
A T 11 11 1 _ TL_ /"1:a__ L__ 199/1 _1_11 �_�__ 7___a_ a1_ l
1 Vll,y •'l. iJ.lr.lr. 1.. 111, %_ny uy 177L Jllall aumv11GG a aLUUY LV 4valuaw Lll, ua%, Of rl,y watt,
L__ _A aL___ _ - 1__ : -_ _7___1 _ __ L_.______ _ _7 _ _a........ TL
ayalcilis by 111Lllvluual JLLU,LUL, anu Li1VJG 111vV1vmr, Gual yl mr, u,Lw„11 JGv,lal JL1u,LU1GJ. 111,
el: ti_ 1_11 ___ a1_ �_ __1: ------ -- _7 1__a:��_ : 1_- ..� L_ �__ _7_a:___ �1.,
t.1Ly Jllan ljaaa u1, 11,v%,aaai y uLuLjLuu ,GJ a11u 1-- OUIUl1V110 LV 1111111G111G11L Lll, 1„V11u11G11UaL1V11J of 1116
INFRASTRUCTURE 12/97 4 -9
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
Policy 4.D.2.2.1 -2.: The City �y X9732 Wil, faSS ail vru�iiancc shall continue, in its land
development regulations, to requir6ng golf courses to investigate methods to conserve irrigation
water and shall establish the use of treated wastewater effluent as the first priority source of
irrigation water for golf courses. if reclaimed water is available..
Policy 4.D.2.2.23.: The City on or LVc'Lv —ic Jaiiaa:y, i>;i shall continue to encourage -by
resolutio n via its membership in the SUA consortium, the Seacoast Utility Authority to investigate
additional sources of potable water and to develop alternative treatment systems. (including reverse
osmosis) where necessary to maintain a potable water supply sufficient to serve the projected
population of the service area of the level of service adopted by this and other municipal
comprehensive plans having jurisdiction in the service area.
AQi ERJZECW ME
GOAL 4.E.1: INCREASE GROUNDWATER RECHARGE WHERE PRACTICABLE.
Obiective 4.E.1.1: Within three _years after completion by $FWMD, the City shall use the
recommendations of the Lower East Coast Water Supply Plan to evaluate and amend the
comprehensive plan to address its groundwater recharge policies.
Policv 4.E.1.1.1: The Citv shall continue to regulate land use and development activities so as to
minimize impacts on the quality of aquifer resources and wellfield zones, expecially those
activities which may affect natural recharge areas or surfacowaters.
A T 1 1_
T__ 1AAC aL. t-4!A__ _ _!AL AL_ C4V�TTT1&ZV% - --3 C1_ -.. ._L TTA!I!A -_ W RIJUILIVU Y.L' .1.1. ".Y
1770, LIIU %ALLY, 111 I.V11JL111I.L1V11 VV1L11 LIIU Jl' VV 1V11J allU OUM.VQJL IJL1l1Ly
/ __AL..-la__ ___!11 L..__.. __�_L1l..L_.1 - �___�d____�_� J._L..L...._ A_ _11 �_ �..___..W ..�a _t �_..L ._��..
LIULIIV11Ly, VV111 11aVG VaLa1/11J1IUU a rIVUIIUW"LGI UaLQVaJG LV al1VVV aaaUaai11G11L Vl lCl.11al �G•
T1..T!___ A T 1 1 1- TL_ _4' _�
A Vll,y 'T.L' .1.1.1. 111, Vlty 0110.11, W1U1111 vll, y,0.1 a1L,1 all VIL113DIVIL Vl 1W I.V111Fl1,LlG11J1VG 1J1a11,
_]_�a 1___1 ,1 ____1__�_�a ___L!_L aL_- a _ 11/1\
adopt laud u,v,lVYlu,lu 1,ru1aLLV11D W111,11 lLLJUII%, JJiujc%ia gicaici ulall Lcll k1u) acid III KZ%., Lv
aM__a _�_ _� _L._71 ____ ____'D_� W_�•a_�'�_ ____71_ ___L _�_ _a_a7_
,V11JLruct Vll, Vl 111V1, suanV W aliull,l 111V1J1tV1111r, W,11J W11,1, JL0.tl, Wau i i,v,1J 0.1, LV UL:
micaJUl,u gival L,l ly .
A V1 1 1 11_ R+L_ -_.- _______. _a .a_ ___1
A Vu,y 'V.A1.1.1.A1. 111, Vlty WILL IJIUV1L1, Lail raur,,.7 aL 1W Fuuu, Ja1,Ly auu 1jUUI L. WVll\J la,ulL1,3
. aL_ !'1'a__ Tl_a_ __11,_a__� ___'ll L_. _____7___ aL aL_ V1r"K1T71RTl
111 Ul, t.11y. LaLa ,Vll „L1V11 Will V, ,V V1 LL111aL,LL W1Ul LLl, Jl VY lY1L.
A V1 1 1 1_ TL_ /'l;a__ _ -_7 aL_ 0T"11T1L K7-% ___.11' __�_.7_ aL_ _ 4,
1 Vll,y 7.1:J.1.1.J. 111, 'k-LLy 0.11u Lll, Jl” VY 1Y11J W 111 Lim, 111vinwi 11r' UaLa.
!1L2__t2 ___ A T 9 •1_ T__ •%AAA aL_ d�!a__ •- • ..�!_� •�L a.L_ [1______a, TTL!I! —_ 1 -L_ila.__
V1/JU%- LIVG 'T.L.J.A,. Ly AiVVV, L11G LILY, ill I.VI1JUIII.L1V11 VVILII L11G JGaI.VAJL vLluLy CfliL11V11Ly and
INFRASTRUCTURE 12/97 4 -10
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
AL_ cIrnxrl&KT •11 L.___ __W _!1_J ��J ._�_1___..J W_�!�_�!�_ -�l._� J��_ a� a!C__
L11G l71' VV1VA"q VVlll 11avu L.V1111J11GLL a11U llllal,'L.GLL 111V1111V1111� 1J1Q11 UaLQ W LjUamllj r1VU11UVV4LG1
L,_�_._ -_7 .1!__L _��_ 1.... for a.__�_1 ___3 Ya!i'!__!�l __ L���_ /J -•'__L _�..W�
1 GL.11Q1 �G Q11LL !V!�L11Q1 �'G 1 aLGJ 1V1 11QLL11 Ql allLL al L1111,1Q1 1 G\dlal rG/ UlJl.11al �'G J,'JLGl11J•
A T '1 11 1_ TL_ __ 1a'1 L_7_____ ___.11 ____ L L__:�_ _ L____
LL V11L.,' 'T•L' •J •!r•J., 111G allaLy Li%,al LL,Ld1111LjUC5 W111 UJL, SUU- U0.J111J 0.J 1L,L,lla1 �L. UV LL11ua11L,J W11L.LG
A T '1 1% '1_ T_a__a'_W_ r C _ �____a__ _1_11 , ,7 ____1_.
> vua y •+.i..a.�..�.. r Vw1u1V111L uiL au11aL w vl �lvunuwaLG1 ailu auilaw Wai�i allall uG uL vL 1u�JeL1
to Yivvluu a rgiaYlii% icYi%SciiLaiivu vi i%Cilair-,c ai1L,l uia-�.liaig% aicaS.
A T 7 11 '1_ TL_ _ 1_a] L r r
1 VIlL,J' •T•L' •J•!r•J• 111L, 1L.lal1VG 1Glrllal�V 1alGJ Vl ulLl%,LL,lll LY U%.J VI Juila%,G waLLl 1110.11artG111k,11L
_1_11 L_ _ __1___a__7
J�'JL�,111J Jllall VV GV0.1LL0.LGU.
INFRASTRUCTURE 12/97 4 -11
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT
Goals. Obiectives and Policies
GOAL 5.1.: ENSURE THE SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND ENVIRONMENTAL
RESOURCES OF THE PALM BEACH GARDENS COASTAL AREA ARE MAINTAINED
AND ENHANCED THROUGH THE REGULATION OF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
THAT WOULD DAMAGE OR DESTROY SUCH RESOURCES, OR THREATEN HUMAN
LIFE AND CAUSE UNNECESSARY PUBLIC EXPENDITURES IN AREAS SUBJECT TO
DESTRUCTION BY NATURAL DISASTERS.
Objective 5.1.1.: 111 aC.C,vidaiICE; n-:,L;i 163Y.JLr02d, K .5., tThe City shall review, and
e sc -V-V 'JLJLC-LV 11ECEssa1y, continue to maintain land development regulations which regulate
development in the coastal area in a manner which preserves, protects, or enhances the
remaining coastal area resources. The City's coastal high hazard area is defined a$ the
Cateeory 1 Hurricane evacuation area. consistent with F.S. 163.3178 (3) (c) (2).
Policy 5.1.1.1.: The City will continue to maintain land -Ddevelopment regulations to be adopted
1.v11J1JU.11l wiul �cc«v�l 1�3.32�2(1�, F.S. which shall limit erosion control measures to those that
do not interfere with normal littoral processes or coastal natural resources.
Policy 5.1.1.2.. TL_ T a __Y._� /1_a. —_—_.. — CaL_ l�:ti_ a L_ ___: _a _a,__a_a _. _
111V 1.aitu��,a u1 vtu111au�.a, vl un.. %—uy w vc i%.vmc.0 allu auvYu.0 �.vi1J13u,11L vviul
i, �� r hal, The Citv shall maintain, within its land development regulations,
UIi�. L1V11 1VJ.JLVL 1 1'.U. Jllall _ _
reauirements to ensure that landscaping in the coastal area requiring site plan review shall consist
of a minimum of 90% native vegetation.
Policy 5.1.1.3.: The vegetation removal permit issued to a new development in a coastal area shall
require that, during construction, all new development within the coastal area shall remove all
nuisance and exotic vegetation, sucbl as including. Australian pine, Brazilian pepper, and
Melaleuca be remove from the site.
Policy 5.1.1.4.: In an effort to minimize the impact of development activities on the estuarine
water quality and productivity, the Citv's land development regulations to tvc auvY�cu cv�l�is�crl�
WIL11 Ocaiv11 1�3.���2 k�I, S. shall be maintained to include specific provisions controlling the
building setback from the shoreline and requiring that a native vegetation buffer be preserved or
established along the shoreline and access to a water body be provided in such a way as to
minimize the impact on the shoreline vegetation and the littoral zone.
Policy 5.1.1.5.: The following criteria shall continue to be applied to all proposed marinas
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 2/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 5 -1
during the preparation of marina siting plans:
a. Preference shall be given to sites which have been legally disturbed or identified as suitable
in local marina siting plan elements as opposed to sensitive areas such as Aquatic
Preserves, Outstanding Florida Waters and Critical Manatee Habitat.
b. Non -water dependent uses (such as bait and tackle, restaurants, etc.) shall be situated on
uplands.
C. Marina sites shall be located in areas where upland support services are available and
where there is sufficient upland area to accommodate all needed utilities and marina
support facilities, including parking.
d. Docking facilities shall be approved only if minimal or no dredging and /or filling is
required to provide access by canal, channel, or road.
e. Marina basins shall be approved only when the locations have adequate depths to
accommodate the proposed boat use.
f. Dock and decking design and construction shall ensure light penetration sufficient to
support existing shallow water habitats.
g. Sewer pump -out service shall be made available at all marinas capable of servicing or
accepting boats inhabited overnight or boats which require pump -out service.
h. In the event marina fueling facilities are developed, adequate and effective measures shall
be taken to prevent contamination of area waters from spillage or storage tank leakage.
i. Prior to operation of marina fueling facilities, the developer shall concurrently submit to
the city a copy of the application for a terminal facility and the applicable portion of the
DNR "Florida Coastal Pollutant Spill Contingency Plan." The plan shall describe the
methods of fuel storage, personnel training, methods to be used to dispense fuel, and all
the procedures, methods, materials, and emergency response contractors to be used in the
event of a spill. The plan shall be approved by the city Fire Chief prior to final
development approval.
j . Marina areas shall be compatible with the Future Land Use Map and applicable land
developments regulations in terms of the types and intensities of uses that are permitted.
k. Landscape buffers and setbacks shall be included to mitigate impacts upon adjacent land
uses.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 2/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 5 -2
1. Marinas shall prepare hurricane plans which describe measures to be taken to minimize
damage to marina sites, neighboring properties, and the environment. This hurricane plan
shall be reviewed and approved by the Emergency Management Director and Planning
Director.
m. Marinas shall identify which docking facilities are to be rented and which are to be sold.
Areas available to the public shall be identified and maintained as such.
n. All applications for marinas shall include a market study indicating the need, market area,
and user profile of the marina and which shall include projected' costs and revenues proving
the economic feasibility of the marina.
o. Dry slip use shall be maximized in order to minimize impacts on water quality and
minimize the areas extent of disturbance of the estuary.
p. New marina facilities shall be designed to maximize the water quality benefits of existing
water circulation and shall not adversely affect existing circulation patterns. Improvement
of circulation shall be a preferred consideration when expanding or upgrading existing
facilities.
q. All new and expanded marinas shall provide a demonstration of compliance with State
Water Quality Standards by maintaining a water quality monitoring program approved by
the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (FDER).
Policy 5.1.1.6.: Coastal wetlands shall be protected through regulations that require:
a. Site plans for new development to identify the location and extent of wetlands located
on the property;
b. Site plans to provide measures to assure that normal flows and quality of water will
be provided to maintain wetlands after development; and
C. Alteration of wetlands to be mitigated for by restoring the disturbed wetlands or by
creating additional wetlands within the coastal area in compliance with the Federal,
State and SFWMD regulations.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 2/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 5 -3
Objective 5.1.2.: 11 - ' - --- J �' " r 11-he City shall
111 Q�,�,V14Q11�.G VYllll JG�.L1V11 1VJ•Jf+Vlr, 1'.�7., review, and
rEvlse ziecessary, maintain land development regulations which require all development
along the tidal ditches to preserve a native vegetation buffer.
Policy 5.1.2.1.: The land development regulations shall ulc;ude continue to maintain provisions
for the preservation of the tidal ditch vegetation.
Policy 5.1.2.2.: Drainage systems associated with new development shall not cause a significant
fluctuation in water quality or quantity in the tidal ditches so as to create a marked change in either
the flora or fauna of the tidal ditch area.
Policy 5.1.2.3.: By +992 2000, the City shall prepare complete a Master Drainage Plan for the
entire City that will identify the minor drainage outfalls and their respective basins. The plan shall
identify. the disturbed natural drainage systems which can be restored to the extent economically
feasible. For such disturbed drainage systems, the plan shall recommend remedial actions.
Objective 5.1.3.: t_ " ° t —The City shall
111 QI.%.V11iQ11�.G YY 1111 JG�.11V11 1VJ•JlrVlr, 1' •V•, review, and
re.:s� .�r� -- essary, maintain land development regulations which ensure that the marine
habitat in and the water quality of Little Lake Worth and the Intracoastal Waterway
including the associated estuarine systems, are enhanced.
Policy 5.1.3.1.: Drainage regulations shall ensure best management practices are used to
prevent surface run -off from degrading the water quality of Little Lake Worth or the ICWW.
Policy 5.1.3.2.: By .1991 Through the land development regulations, the City shall pass -a
regulatic continue to requiring require all marinas and docking facilities located in the City to
maintain and submit to the City a fuel spillage contingency plan. Any new marina development
proposed in the City shall include a fuel spillage contingency plan in the application for
development approval.
Policy 5.1.3.3.: The City shall continue to propose to the -sState that rip- rap or other similar
measures be used in the ICWW to increase the marine habitat. Additionally, the City shall support
the Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resources Management in its habitat
protection program in all applicable areas, including the Intracoastal Waterway.
Policy 5.1.3.4.: In order to reduce non -point source pollutant loading's and improve the
functioning of the City's drainage system, the City shall .by- 1»1, �s;mbl�s` continue to enforce
regulations to prohibit dumping of debris of any kind, including yard clippings and trimmings,
into drainage ditches, stormwater control structures, the ICWW and Little Lake Worth.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 2/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 5 -4
Policy 5.1.3.5: The City staff shall review on an ongoing basis, and coordinate with, the policies
and programs proposed by other local governments for the protection of estuaries that are within
the jurisdiction of the City and such local governments. The coordination shall be conducted on
an informal basis to ensure adequate sites for water - dependent uses, prevent estuarine pollution,
control surface water runoff, protect living marine resources, reduce exposure to natural hazards,
and ensure public access.
Objective* 5.1.4. By 1995, iln coordination with other agencies, the City shall identify
continue to collect informatipn on all species of special concern that either inhabit or
transit the coastal area and adopt specific regulations to provide for their protection.
Policy 5.1.4.1.: The City shall continue to compile an inventory all known nesting sites,
feeding areas, breeding grounds and areas of transit for species of special concern.
Policy 5.1.4.2.: The City shall rcv w, a�lu I��isc „� ��� �l--- sary, maintain land
development regulations to provide for the maximum protection of all species of special
concern identified in the coastal area and their habitats.
Policy 5.1.4.3: The City shall cn;ui7c ulat Uy 1991, assist Palm Beach County_ to ensure that all
known manatee areas are adequately posted with manatee warning signs. If the problem of boat
speeding persists in spite of the warning signs, the City shall pads a rcgula«cii encourage
reaulatory agencies to redueing reduce boat speeds in the known manatee areas.
Objective 5.1.5.: r_ t `' -- "' '''^' r " tThe City shall
111 11l.1.V14Q11�.G YYILII AG�.L1V11 1VJ•JlrVlr, X.O., review, and
rZ ise i'Llury 11G{ G „aiy, maint2lin land development regulations which provide for the
protection, preservation, and reuse of public and private historic resources.
Policy 5.1.5.1. T_ accordance _ 1 C'f 'f'f/Yl T
y . ill accordance wilth JG1.L1V11 1VJ.JL.VL., 1 .U., 1—The City shall maintain the
following in the land development regulation:
a. Adept eCriteria for the identification of historic resources; and
b. Adept TRegulations for the protection and preservation of historic sites and structures that
may be identified in the City.
Policy 5.1.5.2.: Iy992, tThe City shall continue to:
a. Determine if any structures or sites meet the City's, state, or federal criteria for historic
resources and so designate and map those that do;
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 2/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 5 -5
b. Submit a list of designated historic resources to the Florida Department of State, Division
of Historic Resources, and U.S. Department of the Interior for inclusion on the Florida
Master Sites List and National Register of Historic Places; and
C. Eentinually uUpdate the list of historic resources as appropriate.
Objective 5.1.6.: L - -_ ___SQL r, c tThe City shall review, 111 a1- %.V14a11R.G VVIL11 OUI -L1V11 1VJ.JbVlr U •0 _
-i-i- :-E: U- DiEcEssa y, continue to maintain land development regulations which ensure that
building and development activities are carried out in a manner which minimizes the danger
to life and property from hurricanes and floods.
Policy 5.1.6.1.: The land development regulations shall continue to require that new and
replacement sanitary sewer facilities in flood zones are flood - proofed to prevent inflow and
insure that raw sewage does not leak from sanitary sewer facilities during flood events.
Policy 5.1.6.2.: Regulations shall ensure that new development and redevelopment within "A
Zones" as designated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency employ building
construction techniques which are consistent with the requirements of the Federal Emergency
Management Agency Flood Insurance Program.
Policy 5.1.6.3.: The land development Rregulations shall require continue to maintain that land
use types and intensities within the coastal area are consistent with:
a. The Future Land Use Element and Map;
b. Vested development rights;
c. The hazard mitigation annex of the l:,cal p' lan 1995
Comprehensive Emer_cencv Mana_Lyement Plan and the Treasure Coast Hurricane
Evacuation Study;
d. Those which maintain a hurricane evacuation time as established in the Palm Beach County
n _ � r-_ 1995 Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. r cacamn, y i JL
e. The goals, objectives and policies of this element and the Conservation Element of this
Comprehensive Plan concerning the protection and preservation of natural resources.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 2/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 5 -6
Policy 5.1.6.4.: 1)Gbllllllllr 111 1771, L11G %__ ny a 10.11 111JL1LLi Lam, all 0.1u ual L1GG
__� - �____W ____ L___�_1 __ ._ __��___a_J
ll llllllldi PTOg'10.111111 W111G1► 0. JLLl YG.' VL W 111L1L111 V W11110.L.0.1 LLJ 1J GVIILLLLGLGLL ailu aFF1 VI1110.LG iL1GGJ
rca-ioicu o1 iiiiiuilciL The Citv's Public Works Department shall continue its program to regularly
provide trimminc and nrunine of Citv street trees and trees on Citv_ pro_nerty as a pre- hurricane
precaution to windthrown hazards.
Objective 5.1.7.: The City shall cooperate with Palm Beach County in maintaining the
hurricane evacuation time as established in the Palm Beach County i L-;ai,I-F;Lili1G li1GirV110_y
Pla�l Comprehensive EmerLyencv Management Plan.
Policy 5.1.7.1.: The City shall coordinate with the county to determine the most efficient
evacuation routes and shelter space.
Policy 5.1.7.2.: The city shall maintain densities in the existing residential developments in
coastal areas as approved in the development plans. Residential densities in the mewlq future
armexed annexation coastal areas shall be established consistent with the above Objective.
Objective 5.1.8.: The City shall provide immediate response to post- hurricane situations.
Policy 5.1.8.1.: After a hurricane, a special meeting of the City Council shall be convened to
hear preliminary damage assessments, appoint a Recovery . Task Force, decide if a temporary
moratorium is necessary on building activities to protect public health, safety, and welfare.
Policy 5.1:8.2.:, The City shall name a Recovery Task Force to include the City Manager,
department directors, and other members as directed by the City Council. Staff shall be provided
by the departments whose directors sit on the Task Force. The Task Force shall be disbanded
after implementing its responsibility.
Policy 5.1.8.3.: The Recovery Task Force shall have the following responsibilities: review
and decide upon emergency building permits; coordinate with state and federal officials to
prepare disaster assistance applications; analyze and recommend to the City Council hazard
mitigation options including reconstruction or relocation of damaged public facilities;
develop a redevelopment plan; and recommend amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, ;.kcal
n____a.__ r_________ .,,__ City Emercencv Manacement Plan and other appropriate policies
1 G0.GGLll11G 1i111G1�G11G.' L 10.11 _ _ _ _ ,
and procedures.
Policy 5.1.8.4.: The City shall pursue the following post- emergency activities: immediate
repairs to potable water, wastewater, and power facilities; removal of debris;
stabilization or removal of structures about to collapse; . and minimal repairs to make dwellings
habitable. These actions shall receive first priority in permitting decisions. Long -term
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 2/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 5 -7
redevelopment activities shall be postponed until the Recovery Task Force has completed its
tasks.
Policy 5.1.8.5.: The City shall revise continue to maintain land development regulations pursua
w SG1,Lion ��3.���2 k1), F.S. to require structures which suffer damage in excess of fifty percent
of their appraised value, to meet all current requirements including those enacted since
construction of the structure.
Policy 5.1.8.6.: The City shall is via% iailu u%vvivYiliiili iiruiaiivila Yuiauaili LV 0%,L,LIVL1 1VJ.JGVG
k1 j, F.S. continue to require structures which suffer repeated damage to pilings, foundations,
or loadbearing walls to rebuild landward of their current location or modify the structure to
delete the areas most prone to damage.
Policy 5.1.8.7.: The Recovery Task Force shall review all interagency hazard mitigation
reports as they are produced and make recommendations for amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan accordingly.
L- 1 A _ T__ 7IAAC �L_ !'�!�.__ _�_PP L._ll -3 �- t �_ 41-- !'�!� 11!1 P_ ,
lJ1JJGL,LlYG 0.1.7.. L,' 1770, LIM %-ILy JLall Jllall jll GjJMU aIIU jJl GJG11L LV LIM %,ILy L.VLlllt.0 1Vl
T1._� 3 1_- 1 -2 ____1_»_ -a __l_a!___ __ -3W_ -1,_ AL_d
ajljJl VYaI, l,VllljJl G11G11J1YG llall allu lallu UV Y GIVjJ111G11L 1GS UlaL1V11J aIIIUIIUl11G11LJ L11aL
..�.... __ -___ _�J
G11L,VUlage arm la%ALIILaLG LIM UG Y GIVjJ111G11L Vl YY aLGl- UGjJG11UG11L MAU vvaMa -1 G1aLGU USES Vv ILlilll
LIIG \.VaJLal al Ga•
r_1!___ TL_ /"�_�_. _a_Cr _L_11 ,.l ____1_- ___1 - aL_ /•'�. a__. /'1 ___ -_.1 _
1 V111.J' 0.1.7.1•. AM, l-.1Ly JLall Jllall utivLdVjl anu 1J1L.3G11L LV LM, L.1Ly %_vu %,n aJ all a111t IIUIII1:11L
aL _. /1_� -__L ._�..: _._ T7_� _1 L_ti___ 1.. -A -a aL___ L_
lV u1L. L.vu1jJ1 L;.11G11JlvV 11x11, a L,VLLJLal alba luLU1L, lallu uJG L,a LL,rVLy alms u vai., aicaJ LU UV
u%,5iS la LGU aJ such.
n._ll..__ C 1 A •1 _ TL_ /'1.`_ _L_11 _1____.l_� _ -� - �_.._ -a a_ aL_ !"�.a_. /'�___ -_.1 _ �W_ -a a_ a
1 umq J•1.7•!r•. 111%, L.1Ly Juan u�.Yl.1VjJ a11L1 jJ1L„JG11L LV L11%, L.1LY \.vuul,u aJ an amV'ilulucit LV the
GVWng L,VL1L:, L11L, lvllVWM6 waJLal 0.1Ga L,%jnmr,' l.0. LL,�V11LiJ, VL Jululal L.alG�V11L.J, auu Lim, a1L.QJ
_ L_ _1____�_a__7 _ __L
LV a dcs-Ig la LGU as Such.
$ \ V11u11G1L,la1-111a1111CL u131111,L 1V1 lAlly u%,v%,ivF%,u lilai nia uaGJ. A inualy uJL,J Jllall uC
l.�.a_� a_.
111111LGU LV L,vnALuG1L,1a1 Wall„1- uGjJL,11uL.11l UJL,J Wllll UIC; LVIIVW111r, jJ11v11Ly lalll -mr,.
1\ -__L1.
A f pliulx%, uJG 111aLuiaJ,
Lf L,V11ll11G1L,1a1 11Jllulg�
.J f vulcl wai�.i viiiili16.,u la.i,L%aUVII, a11u
4) WaLGl- LL,latcd uics.
]� 'Coinn _�_ -_1 ___a_/ _1._a�._a l__ 1___ . .____ __. ._1 -.a_A __. T�. -__�_. __ L_1/ L
U- 1.V111111L.1 L.la1 -L,V0.J UL1 u13L111,L 1V1 1GJJ 111LLr11JL,, WaLGI- i%,laLbu uJ1,J. A iu11aLy uava Jllall VC.
._
lulu LL,U LV L,V11u111:1L,1a1 allu 1L,L,ll,aLIV11a1 waLLil- LLGjlL.11uLrllL allu waLL,l -i L,laL{ru uaGJ.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 2/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 5 -8
____._a_1 a__a_'_a a_ L_ _____t__a __ ____a <-a__1 �.-. _ 1 \t,J lULllUa1- t,VaJLai UlJL11L.L LV U%, VvcllayLu Vll cAlJLlur, lwlucuual �
LV LLt LG1111111G
L_11 L_. 1.W.a_a
LLGG11JlLy. 1 innaly uJGJ Jllall V1, LunILGLL LV 1c0lucllUal W1Ul at,t,t,JJVly waLld- t1ti,JC11t1td1L Vi
1_a_a __
wa cr- rclalcu uses rc uii7e d.
7 _ /"i_- ___a_-a _ L aL_ a•�_ L _�_ - a_a L__ 1l -7 7"1/tn /1\ T V a1__ /'1_a__
1 Vlll,y J•1.7 •J•. %.V11010LC11L WlUL Ulc Lllllcllalllc JJLVVlIR,tl Vy Ut:V L1Vl1 1VJ.JGVG `Lb 1.U., Ulc %-LLy
51_11 __]_-a 1_ —a a___- 1__�__ -a ____1_a:_ -_ _�:�- : a. C__ ___L1! - __ - -__
Jllall auvlJL, lams Ul.vclv1Jlu6;;11L 1crulaLlVliJ 1t,%JUlLUlr, Vl JJ1VVlulllr, JVJ pUV11L, accC:JJ UlLVUr'll 11t,W
TV ilYaLC tic VC1Vjlll%,l1L Vi JitbJ Lv all %.&l3L111r, WaLGi- W.,,Jt,llLLClll IJUUllc i%,%,D_aiivRa
_1_
laCuRy 1Vt,aLGU al ux%, Jllvlcl111 -
1• 1 A A . TL_ 1_ -a a____7 - - -_ -a 1 _a._ -_ - a__-a_ _1L_11 aL_a _11
1 Vlll,y J•1.7 •'*•. lllb lams L%,rula L1V11J a111tll%lll1td1W Jllall %,nault, ulaL all WaLt,l
aL_
LL{r�Jt,11uc11L anu waiGi- LClalctl uacJ l.Vll1Fly Wlul Luc VVJct,LlvcJ anu VL L1110 clt,lllt,lll.
T_1!___ C 1 n L. _ TL_ P7_a__ _L_11 - aL_ _ aL- _1___1 L_ ,. ,.,I
1 VllL,y J•1.7 •J•. lm, t,lLy Jllall pivi5VJC LV UK, Cvuiny U1aL all 11LLtillvt,al arly v 11td1L VG Jirm u
_ aL_ L_ - iGaa _A] ---- a L aL_
lcgarul-lg Lllc IJlainimr, Vl Lllb uuil,v1JViaibu bvaaLal a auJa%,%nL V
Lllt, t,lly.
Obiective 5.1.9: The Citv shall maintain and imulement the Palm Beach Countv Boat Facilitv
Sitine Plan to ensure the protection of manatees in and around the City's coastal areas and
waterbodies.
Policv 5.1.9.1: The Citv shall assist and cooperate with Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
and all relevant agencies with the implementation of the Palm Beach County Boat Facility Siting
Plan.
Objective 5.1.10.: "- °- !- r!___1 lnnn ,nA, tThe level of service standards
1)G�'llliilll� 111 11JL.Q1 ,'Glal 177V -1771,
adopted for the entire City in the Capital Improvements Element and other elements of
this Comprehensive Plan shall continue tp be applied to the traffic circulation and
infrastructure facilities of the coastal area whenever development orders or permits
are requested. The service area and phasing of such facilities shall be consistent with
the goals, objectives, and policies of this and all other elements of this Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 5.1.10.1.: The City shall apply the level of service standards adopted elsewhere in
this Comprehensive Plan for facilities in the coastal area and the additional standards under this
objective whenever development orders or permits are requested.
Policy 5.1.10.2.: As part of the development approval process, the City shall require
developments which would cause public facilities to operate below their adopted levels of
service standards to provide for, either in the provision of fees or infrastructure
constructed to City standards, the facilities necessary to maintain the adopted levels of
service standards concurrent with the impacts of the development.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 2/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 5 -9
Policv 5.1.10.3: The City shall encouraLye the location of public infrastructure away from the high,
hazard coastal areas. and shall limit the amount of public expenditures in this area.
COASTAL MANAGEMENT 2/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 5 -10
CONSERVATION ELEMENT
Goals. Obiective$ anal Policies
GOAL 6.1.: THE NATURAL RESOURCE OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
SHALL BE PRESERVED OR MANAGED IN A MANNER WHICH MAXIMIZES THEIR
PROTECTION, FUNCTIONS, AND VALUES.
Objective 6.1.1.: Air quality in the City shall continue to meet or exceed the minimum air
quality levels established by DEP 'JU
f 1 1 1 _ TL_
L_ 11 La_.� L_ Tl:__.___- r7`�__:�__W _� _1 V___�___ _�.1 T'��:�__�_
1 Ulll.y U.1.1.1.. 111E t.1Ly Jllall VULalll uxt., 111V1Jiv11 Vl l_A1V11V1u11G11Lai JL.1G1lccs al1LL Lill�llll.l.1111�
raL_ "-1— Tl___L TT__1a1L TT_]a A_
Vl Li1L. 1 ailll 1lGa%,n %-v Ullly 11%.0.141 V111L Cillllual IX%,IJV1L baldl p_aL anu %,unilia1G. 1L W1L11 L.A1JL111r, all
_l.0.__
giizu1Ly JIQUUaluJ lV wl.avuJU Liu, 1LiVl:1`Jf Vl bv111�J11ai1Vti aLL0.111111ent.
Policy 6.1.1.2 1.: In accordance with section 163.3202, F. S . , the City shall rc �:c w , arlu i c iac
w; crc rlcccssai-y, continue to maintain land development regulations to provide for fuel- saving
techniques such as promoting car - pooling, public transit, bicycling, and walking. This shall be
acheived through the implementation of the parkway system, the installation of sidewalks for all
new developments. the retrofit of neighborhoods with sidewalks and the repair of existing
sidewalks. and requirements such as provision of bicycle racks.
Policy 6.1.1.3 2.: In an effort to reduce reliance on automobile travel, the City shall implement
T , _ T-11 -- _.__J__a ___ a__:,______
e 1.1:li age 1 10.11 1rV11J1JL111r vi p u%.,aL11a1L 110.LU1 V L1 aii W ay S Darkway system, as the vacant newly
armexed areas are developed; eoopera assist wit : r mill iiicai> i %_vuu%y ii1 ucvc'cfing a
the Metropolitan Planning Organization in the implementation of its
l.Vlll 11r11L.11J1 V V Llli 1r1G t 10.11 _
Transit Study and Bicycle Facilities Plan; and coordinate with CvPalmTran to increase the public
transportation service in the City.
Policy 6.1.1.4 3.: The City shall cooperate with county and state agency programs to reduce air
pollutants on a regional level.
Policy 6.1.1.5 4.: All proposed point sources of pollution shall present evidence of compliance
with the DEP D : regulations prior to being approved. No proposed point source of pollution
shall be approved which exceeds the level of air quality established by the State Implementation
Plan.
CONSERVATION 1/98
EAR - BASED AMENDMENT 6 -1
Objective 6.1.2.: VVIL11 1116 L1111G11Qi11G y1vV1UUU vy LL7U%,L1U11 kAJ,K.0.y fThe
City shall adept continue to maintain development regulations to manage surface and
sub - surface water resources in a manner which ensures their viability as natural habitats and
utility for recreational and potable water uses. Furthermore, the regulations shall protect
the quality and quantity of waters that flow into estuarine waters in the City.
Policy 6.1.2.1.: In accoruancc with J�r1r11V11 i�3.32C2, .S., tThe City shall r� ri%w, auu rcvialwo
w J'LJL%-1rc Accessary continue to maintain drainage regulations to ensure best management practices
are required.
Policy 6.1.2.2.: In wit: 0—CA-AllJ11 163.3202, F.S., tThe City shall rcvicw, ailu r%v13%
wh C-rC �1�����ary , continue to maintain land development regulations to ensure that:
a. Site plans for new development identify the location and extent of wetlands located on the
property;
b. Site plans provide measures to assure that normal flows and quality of water will be
provided to maintain wetlands after development;
C. Where alteration of wetlands is necessary in order to allow reasonable use of property,
either the restoration of disturbed wetlands will be provided or additional wetlands will be
created to mitigate any wetland destruction;
d Y,___ r__ �____,_Yin__t_ Land Alteration or development within the proposed
�,71LG 1a11J LVl LLG VGIV 111G11W
Loxahatchee Slough restoration area (ecosite) or the adjacent lands within the Loxahatchee
watershed are consistent with SFWMD policies for water quality and quantity and
SFWMD plans for modifying the hvdroneriod and water levels in the area;
e. Proposed developments comply with the Wellfield Protection Program adopted by the
county; and
f. Site plans identify floodplain areas and incorporate appropriate flood mitigating measures
that comply with regulations promulgated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
Flood Insurance Program.
Policy 6.1.2.3.: The City shall require the review of all proposed wetlands development with the
Florida DEP J/L' Flcr:ua L1K.:, SFWMD, TCRPC, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to
ensure compliance with dredge and fill permitting processes.
Policy 6.1.2.4.: Through the continued implementation of land development regulations to be
a__._a _________t ._ 163 -3x.,2. .1. T the City shall ensure that new developments are
QLLV�ILGLL �l LL1JLLQ11L LV JGGL1V11 1VJ.JLVL `1 J, 1�.U.,
designed in such a manner as to minimize the impact of such developments on the quality of
CONSERVATION 1/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 6 -2
surface and ground water resources, and to further ensure that new, developments do not exceed
the capacity levels for potable water and /or sanitary sewer services.
Policy 6.1.2.5.: By 1995, tThe City shall pai—Licil,atc jai a ,tuuy %,un"innig continue to encourage
the placement of a salinity dam in the tidal ditches along RCA Boulevard to prevent salt water
intrusion into the shallow aquifer.
Policy 6.1.2.6.: in ac%,vi uan%G%, w iii. , . S . , ahe City shall rc � is w , anu i% v is%,
continue to maintain land development regulations to ensure such regulations are
consistent with and implement the county Wellfield Protection Program.
Policy 6.1.2.7: By implementing the provisions of the county Wellfield Protection Ordinance,
the City shall continue to ensure that no new uses are established within the zones of influence of
existing or proposed wellfields that could adversely affect the quality of water resources in the
water recharge area. The City shall also ensure that new potable water wells and wellfields are
located in areas where no regulated materials (e.g. hazardous or toxic materials) are used, handled,
stored or produced within the projected zones of influence of such wells or wellfields.
Policy 6.1.2.8: The City shall cooperate with the SFWMD and Palm Beach County in their
efforts in restoring the Loxahatchee Slough and, managing the Loxahatchee Slough Sanctuary.
The City in conjunction with the SFWMD and Palm Beach County, shall review any development
adjacent to the Sanctuary for.possible adverse impact on the Sanctuary during the development
approval process.
Objective 6.1.3.: By 1991, tThe City, in conjunction with Seacoast Utility Authority,
NPBC::'^,ID, and the SFWMD, shall ueiE'li p, au &Nt, and continue to monitor and enforce
provisions for monitoring and regulating water use in order to prolong freshwater availability
pursuant to land development regulations,
Policy 6.1.3.1.: The City shall provide technical assistance to and cooperate with the SFWMD
in preparing and adopting an emergency water management conservation plan.
Policy 6.1.3.2.: hn accsuanc;, Wit: s%A L1U!1 163.3202, . S . , tThe City shall � � � �� w , al-Lu
continue to maintain land development regulations which require water
conservation strategies which are consistent with programs promulgated by the Seacoast Utility
Authority, NPBC::'%ID, and SFWMD, and other viable programs such as:
a. Wastewater reuse for irrigation if economically feasible;
b. Separate metering for irrigation with potable water;
CONSERVATION 1/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 6 -3
c. A reduction in use of potable water for irrigation; and
d. A more efficient operation of irrigation systems including the incorporation of such devices
as soil water tensiometers and xeric landscaping where appropriate.
Policy 6.1.3.3.: The City shall cooperate with the SFWMD in developing and implementing
programs for the further education of the public regarding various methods of water conservation
at the household and small business level.
Objective 6.1.4.: I,1 &a.9.vi daimix `VVah 3GL.L1V11 —VAllVfk .L7., tThe City shall review, and,
revise n here 11GCG33-ary, continue to maintain land development regulations to ensure the
control of soil erosion.
PolicPolio 6.1.4.1.: TL_ L_„ :_ The City shall continue to maintain
y 111E \ 11y �11a11 1111rvJLpvraL%, i11L appiopiiatc y
land development regulations which implement Palm Beach County Soil and Water Conservation
District guidelines ir1L0 r%-,gu1a«v1-15 on development activities and land clearing.
Policy 6.1.4.2.: All commercial mining practices shall be prohibited throughout the incorporated
area of the City.
Objective 6.1.5.: ir1 a%A-vr uail%V, vvi% i ;V;,f ;,11 AV0.aA1V,&, .S., tT-he City shall nevi v;-xnd
re ia-� where rkcessary, continue to maintain land development regulations to ensure that all
ecological communities, wildlife, and marine life, especially endangered and rare species, are
identified, managed, and protected.
Policy 6.1.5.1.: The City's land development regulations s ihall will continue to ensure that:
a. All endangered and threatened plant, animal and marine populations are protected;
b. Habitat of critical value to regional populations of endangered and threatened species is
preserved;
C. Nuisance and invasive exotic vegetation (i.e. Brazilian Pepper and Melaleuca) is removed
by the developer at the time of development or redevelopment of a site; and
d. Removal of native vegetation is minimized in the land development process; and, where
it is economically feasible, removed material is relocated on site.
e. Environmental Assessments are provided for any land development /alteration proposal or
properties containing environmentally sensitive lands.
CONSERVATION 1/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 6 -4
Policy 6.1.5.2.: Development orders and permits for development and redevelopment activities
shall be issued only if the protection and conservation of wildlife, marine life and natural systems
are ensured consistent with the goals, objectives., and policies of this Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 6.1.5.3: The City shall continue to cooperate with the SFWMD, and Palm Beach County,
through the exchange of technical information and informal coordination, in order to make a
concerted effort to protect and conserve unique vegetative communities that exist in the
Loxahatchee Slough area and which fall under multiple local jurisdictions.
Policy 6.1.5.4: V11J1JLGllI Wll1
\ ll �J1VV1J1V11J Vl UG\ L1V11 1VJ.J/rVL kih F.S., -The City shall
adept maintain land development regulations containing specific standards and guidelines for the
protection of environmentally sensitive lands containing one or more of the following:
a. A habitat of critical value to regional populations of threatened and endangered species;
b. A rare and unique upland community such as coastal scrub;
C. Functioning and jurisdictional wetlands and deepwater habitats;
d. Any part of the Loxahatchee Slough Sanctuary;
e. Sites of historical or archaeological significance;
L Xeric hammock or xeric scrub;
Z, Tropical hammock;
h. Low hammock, temperate hammock. or mesic hammock;
L Mixed hardwood swamp or hydric hammock;
js Pond apple slough;
k Cvpress swamp;
1,. Freshwater marsh;
m. Mangrove swamp;
ns Oak forest:
o. Pine flatwoods. mesic and hydric;
CONSERVATION 1/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 6 -5
Scrubby flatwoods;
-q-. Coastal dune and strand;
r. Wet prairie;
Native habitats other than those listed above may also be designated as environmentally significant
if thev are actively used by or likely to support or contain U.S.- listed endangered, or threatened
species and /or state listed - endangered or threatened species, or species of special concern;
Policy 6.1.5.5.: The City shall require that an environmental assessment be prepared prior to
alteration of the land consistent with the provisions of the Natural Resources and Environmentally
Significant Lands Couc section of the land development regulations.
Policy 6.1.5.6.: To ensure protection of environmentally sensitive areas and listed species, the
City shall implement the following criteria either in combination or sinszly for anv proposed
alteration of lands designated as environmentally significant pursuant Comprehensive Plan policy
6.1.5.4;
1 The project design provides for the protection and preservation of the most valuable or
unique existing natural resources. listed species and environmentally significant lands on
site;
2. If no listed species have been determined to exist on the site or on -site preservation would
yield a preserve area that is less than the preferred minimum of ten acres or unavoidable
impacts to wetlands occur, an alternative form of mitigation acceptable to the City Council
is implemented:
U.�.O.6: 3a. The City than frcJcrvc, as a A minimum, 25% of upland native plant
communities intact with canopy, understory and groundcover (e.g. pine sand scrub, xeric
oak forest, hardwood hammock, pine flatwoods) is set aside as a preserve or;
3b. In cases of lots of less than 40 acres or where the quality of habitat on any size parcel does
not warrant preservation of upland habitat on -site, preservation of such habitat on -site is
not otherwise required by policy or ordinance, and upland habitat of equivalent type and
area is available elsewhere in the City, the developer shall preserve similar communities
off -site, provide monies for the acquisition of similar or better quality native plant
communities, or restore similar plant communities. Off -site ,preservation and restoration
of communities may be required at a greater ratio;
CONSERVATION 1/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 6 -6
4a. Wetland habitats are set -aside as preserves, and development is prohibited in wetlands
except under the following circumstances consistent with Treasure Coast Regional
Plannine Council Policy 6.6.1.1):
1) Such an activitv is necessary to prevent or eliminate a public hazard;
2) Such an activity would provide direct public benefit which would exceed those lost as
a result of the modification;
3) Such an activity is proposed for habitats in which the functions and values currently
provided .are significantly less than those typically associated with such habitats and cannot
be reasonably restored;
4) Due to the unique geometry of the site, it is the unavoidable consequence of
development for uses which are appropriate given site characteristics, or:
5) The functions and values provided by wetland habitats to be destroyed are already
completely and fully replaced prior to occurrence of the proposed impact to existing
habitat,
4b. Wetlands shall be protected by a density transfer program to upland areas. Where
development occurs within wetlands, the developer must mitieate the function and value,
of those wetlands. Development activities shall occur at a density of no more than one
dwelling unit per five acres, shall be clustered to the least environmentally sensitive
portion of the site and shall include design considerations to protect the wetland functions
of the rest of the site. Consistent with SFWMD regulations, a minimum 15 -foot upland
buffer composed of native vegetation shall be preserved or established around wetland
areas.
5 For a site on which listed which listed species are known or suspected to be present, ono
of the following criteria shall be satisfied:
1. It shall be successfully demonstrated that the proposed land alteration/development
activity will not preclude the continued survival and viability of those listed species
located on site; or
2. A plan for relocation, either on -site or off -site, for those listed species. shall be
approved by all appropriate agencies.
CONSERVATION 1/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 6 -7
Policy 6.1.5.7: Public /Institutional buildings shall be prohibited in the Conservation land use
designation and within other environmentally sensitive lands, including wetlands, 100 -year
floodplains, groundwater aquifer recharge areas, areas set aside by development to meet the 25
percent preservation of native ecological communities and wildlife habitats.
f 1 C O_ _1-_11 L_ __] L_- —_1__,]
1 Vium Jj V.1.0.0. TV GL1a11L1a allali UG FJLVIGGIGU uy a LLG11J1LY uai1J1G1 pivSialll lV uplallu aiGaa.
.___: _a__a _ --- L ['+l^[S 711 A'T _La!___ • _� 1C r__a -__1__J L__rr__ �
_r
\..V11J1JLGllI W1U1 01- VT lY11J LGb'U10.L1V11J, 0. lllllillllulll 1✓ -1VVL UFJla11U VUl1G1 GV111FJVJGLL V1 i1QL1VG
a_a!__ _L_11 L_ _L_� _a __.:11 not L _
VG�GLaL1V11 Jllall VG FJIGJGI VGU Vl GJLQV1lJ11GU 0.1VU11LL WGL1Q114 R1G0.J. 1JGVG1VFJ111Gl11 W111 11VL UG
_l1______1 !_ ____al__'_ ___ -_ -a ____]_T aL_ _!�___�_a_____ ILL %.'v..i
0.11V WGLL 111 WGUa11LLJ, GJLGGFJL U11LLG1 L11G 1V11V W111� G11GU111J {.[L11GGJ `GV11J1JLG11L W1L11 11G0.JU1G l.V0.Jl
!7___ -_!1 T_17__- 1/\ 1 1 1 \_ 1\ ____L __ __a!___a__ _
1 \Gr,ivua1 i 1Q1 mir, \..V L111G11 1 V11G�' iv..L..L.I j. 1 f JuGll all a"iv1L�' 1J 11000JJal.' LV FL1,VG11L Vl
L;___�_l L___r_a __.L!_L __.___1.1
G11111111a LG a FJUUIIG 11QGalu, G� JLLGll all aGL1V1Ly WVUlu F IVV1uG LLuI:GL FJL1U11G UGL1G11L w111G11 wvu1L1
_ aL___
GAGGGU .7 L11VJG 1VJl aJ a iGaulL V1 Li1G 111VUl11Gauvu, ✓� aul.0 an 0.GLlvlly 1J Invi/VJGl1 lvl uaulLaLJ 111
W 111611 111E 1u11GUVl1J allu values Gu11G11L1.' FJ1VVilLGU 0.16 3ir1u11Ga1u1y 1GJJ Man U1VJG LyJJil.auy
_____ -_a_ -7 _a L_ �______Ll_. �__a_�__] A\ A___ a_ aL_ ___!____. .__- �_a___ .. r
associaLGU Wllil Owai 11aU1LaLJ a11u Galul'I UG 1Gaavllauiv 1wL.v1GU, '7'J UUG LV u1G LL111LFUG r'G.V111GU.' V1
�- --- 1_ -�__a __ --- - __L'_L
L11G aMj 1L 13 L11G u11QVV1uaulG GV11aGLFLLGIIGG Vl uG VG1VFJ111Gl111Vi LLJGJ W1uG11 a1%;; appivi111aLG rivLn
G___a! _� _ ____
J1LG G11Q10.G1G11J L1GJ, 0.11LL JJ L11G 1U11G LLV1IJ a11LL V Q1uGJ FJ1 V V luGU U.' W %,Lla11u 11au1La LJ LV uG UV OLL V�'Gu
- l�__,1 -- 7_a_t__
0.lG all G0.uy GV111FJ1GlGly 0.11LL hilly 1GFJ1aGGLL iJl 1V1 lV VGGUll G11GG Vl u1G FJl ViIVJGLL ll11FJQGl LV GJL1J 1111
L_L]a_a
110. U1LaL. 1.;,Aa 11FJ1Ga Vl 3llu0.L1V11J W11%,1%, L11GJG GAGGFJl.1V113 wvulu aF piy aiG LUU11L1 lil L11G im,-6 ilai
!l_W_�_L _ -_!_._ Tl_1!__. "l_�
1...V111FJ1Gh%a61vG 1 vuGy 110.11 `rviRy iv.1.1.1.f. YY11G1G UL.vG1VFJ1uGUL VGGUIJ w1L11111 VVGUauuJ, L11Gi
.1__._1___- W aL_
LLG VGIVFJGI 111LLaL 111111�0.LG U1G LU11GL1V11 0.114 Value Vl U105G WGL10.11UJ. 1lLVG1VFJ111G11L QGLIVIUGJ Jllall
_] l� 1___a
VGGUl al CL LLG11J1L.y Vl 11V 111V1G Man V11G L1WG111116 Ullll F %,l Hv%, aGIGJ, Jllall uG l.1uaLG1 GLl 'LO llly 1GaJL
Gi1v11V1u11G11Lally ak.,IMiiivG FJVLLlvll Vl u1G J1lG a11u Jllall L1L.luLLG u%,airii GV113iLLG1aL1V113 LV FJl VLGGL L11G
_al__� L___a_ _
wGL1Q11LL LLL11L.L1V11J Vl L11G 1GJL VI L11G 31lG.
Objective 6.1.6.: By 1992, the City, in conjunction with the SWA, shall develop a hazardous
waste management program for the proper storage, recycling, collection and disposal of
hazardous wastes.
Policy 6.1.6.1.: The City shall work closely with and seek technical assistance from the DEP
"111. and SWA in identifying . small quantity hazardous waste generators in the City and in
developing the program for the proper disposal of such hazardous waste.
Policy 6.1.6.2.: The City shall cooperate with the SWA in sponsoring Amnesty Days to collect
household hazardous waste for proper disposal.
Objective 6.1.7.: - -- -7A1V .� tThe City shall , and
111 QGL.Vl L1Q11L,G W1111 JGL.1.1V11 1VJ•JlrVf+ 1'.V•
re-iise w JLJLV;-U continue to maintain land development regulations and development
policies to ensure the provision of conservation measures on newly annexed lands in
accordance with the goals, objectives, and policies of this Comprehensive Plan.
CONSERVATION 1/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 6 -8
Policy 6.1.7.1.: The City shall review the master development plans of all subdivisions approved
by the county but later annexed by the City for the provision of conservation/ preservation areas
as required by the original development order.
Policy 6.1.7.2.: Where development orders granted by another governmental agency are silent,
the comprehensive plan, land development regulations, and policies of the City of Palm Beach
Gardens shall apply.
Objective 6.1.8.: Prior to the issuance of any development orders for that area included in
the Conceptual Linkage Plan presented in the Future Land Use Element of this
Comprehensive Plan, a the plan for all or a part of the 11 aLu� V TI tux vv Parkway
sSystem shall be approve implemented by the City.
'T_l!..__ f 1 O 1 _ TL- -:1 ------- 1_ 1_11 -1__,1 ,. ..0 -11
1 V11,J' V.1.V •1.. 111, L1Q11WaYO pian J11Q11 111,1ULL, all 111V,11L%JLY Vl all J1611111,aia V,r",La L1V11,
1_-�_ _�� :1d1_C._ . Ii 1_.,.1,,,.1 CC....0 u _..1 L_- �L
W,L1Q11LLJ, 0.11LL W11LL111, ,VllLL11Ulll L1,J 111,1ULL,LL Wlllllll all„L,u �/V1 L1V11J Vi Lll, Ql G0. ,V VG1,LL V.Y Lll,
T _ 1__._ T1l_- TL_ _
L.Vll „tJ1110.1 L111Aar,, I: 10.11. 111, %.,ny Jllall Vll\.vuiar,, u1V ul,lUJwn 01 ul,J, 1.V11ll11U1llL1,3 ill LLl, V�lV-
syacc allu Ll all w ay Jy Jwlll Y1vYw,L1 lu ul, u, v clVyul,lu.
Policy 6.1.8.1.: The City shall continue to maintain land development regulations to ensure the
implementation and design of the Parkway : crlay System.
Policy 6.1.8.2.: The ti ail w ay s parkways shall be designed, developed and maintained to serve
a multitude of functions including:
a. Preservation of significant native ecological communities in greenways along the City's
maior corridor$;
b. Separate bicycle and pedestrian circulation through and between land uses within and
adjacent to the areas included within the Conceptual Linkage Plan presented in the Future
Land Use Element of this Comprehensive Plan;
c. Mitigation areas for natural areas disturbed elsewhere within the area included within the
Conceptual Linkage Plan presented in the Future Land Use Element of this Comprehensive
Plan, where applicable;
d. The buffering of adjacent roadways, land uses and developments, where applicable; and
CONSERVATION 1/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 6 -9
e. The provision of public access to the restored Loxahatchee Slough arlu the laigc ii,LcIILIVIi
L- - _� _ aL- _ -_] .t aL ,. .. _t__,_-2 ------ L:_ aL_ /'�„ „�„ „a_ ..1 T :�7__�..
a1Ga LV UG GVIIJUUGLGU Vll LID, W,JL ,1111 V1 U1G 0.1Ga Ill,lUU,U W 1L11111 Ul, l..Vll„ilLUal I_Hul arC;
Tl_� -__] :� aL:_ T!._a__-- T _�_I TT__ T!1___._�a _L aL_ !�._W��_L _. „,���... Tll ..
i laa Pi7csCatcd 111 h1J 1'ULU1, La11u VJ, Li1G111Gl1t VL Lll, \.V1111J1,11,11J1V, l lalll where
applicable.
f. Preserve urban beauty through right of way landscaping requirements;
Provide residents with a safe and multi -use pathway sv_ stem which is recognized as an
urban component of the Florida Greenways System;
h. Eliminate a perceived need for usinLy strip commercial as a buffer between arterials and
residential areas; and
i. The Dhasina of the establishment of the Darkways shall. at a minimum. be relative to the
Dhasiniz of development in the area included within the Conceptual Linkage Plan presented
in the Future Land Use Element of this Comprehensive Plan..
T..11.. -_ L 1 O '1 _ TL_ -1_- _L_11 : _t __A__
1 Vll,y V.1.17.0.. 111E 1 C:u1-JL11ami,4aLu14 I.LauwayJ i/lall Jllall 111Gluul..
A �� 7___1 ,]___.:. a_ _t _11 L._ -*-------.-A _ aL_
a. A Julvc�' allu lcgal uGZ1LIIFLw11 Vl all aiGaJ LV UG 111,VLFvia%.,u 111LV Ill, Liallway J�'JL,1111
L TL_ - L....:_� of aL .. �L l:_LW_aa .l
U . 111, iJ1laJ Hir, Vl UK, 1GJLV10.LIV11 Vl ,J L0.UllJlull,llL Vl LIL, LLallwayJ l,lau VG LV LL1G iJ110.J111b' Vl
aL __ _1___]_.l :aL:- aL_ !'1_,__�� _1 T :�l____ Tll_-
u, V,1ViJ111,11L 111 L11G a1Ga 111,lUUGU W 1111111 Lu, t.Vll„iJLual Lllllrar,, 1 Lau 1Jl,JG11LGll 111 Lll,
T _ -A TT__ 7-1- L ._tea ._l aL:__ /"�_���,_L ._�_:_._ Tll_�
1 L1LUl, Lallu VJ, L.11,111G11t Vl L111J %_vM1J1G11G11J1 V, 110.11.
_.L1. �____1 ______��a
,. 1116 Giliiiy 1GJi7V11J 1U1, 1V1 ul, u, V,lVillll,llt Vl Luc LiallwayJ- JYJLGllI;
_7 A 1:_a .l _� aL_ !l -------
U r 11JL Vl liscs i1G111111WU 111 LID, LL allWayO 111,1UUIIIr, ally 1a,111L1,J lV Uc 1,LVVlucu 1V1
�_.��.. _. a:-�
1G,1GaL1V11 VL 1juDil, a,G,JJ allu LI1G G11L1Ly 1,3i/V1131U1, 1V1 LIL, ,VIIJLlu,L1V11 allU 111au1LG110.11GG
�C aL___ L- _:l:a___�.
Vl U1,J, 1a,111L1G01
A 11 -_11a_ .t �__L1:_ ______ a_ aL- a�__1__.__.- - _._a_�_
G.. All iJV 111W Vl vim, a,,,JJ Lv ulc uallwayJ Jy JLGlll,
t All L_ _]...1: ___a_J L_ _1 all l L -__. a_ L_ L_1.1 L__ a`��.,, __L1. _.
1. !'111 VL u1VJG lalluJ Lv V, u,ul,awu iv ulc ,11:y anu 11 Vl u1wG: LV U, 11,1LL vy Othcl 1JUV11G V1
Yiivaic iuiCriv�i�.
Objective 6.1.9.: WasI13LGllli VVIL11 6116 11111G11a111G FAVViUCU vy L07C;%,LAV11 1VJ.JbVlr kij, 1 .LC7•, The
City shall adept maintain land development regulations which, in conjunction with the efforts
of other regulatory agencies having jurisdiction, shall ensure the protection and preservation
of native habitats, and maximize the provision of open space for this purpose.
CONSERVATION 1/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 6 -10
Policy 6.1.9.1.: The City shall udcfliiie maintain open space requirements in all appropri the
land development regulations with specific reference to conservation and preservation land area
requirements.
Policy 6.1.9.2.: The City shall endeavor to "collect and concentrate" open space conservation
areas to amass significantly large land areas that will be left in their natural settings for public
dedication and use through land development regulations.
Policy 6.1.9.3.: Through the site plan and subdivision review process, the City shall endeavor
to connect open space and conservation/preservation areas with Y%ucstiiau/iia,ui c tiaillways the
Parkwav System wherever possible.
Policy 6.1.9.4.: The City shall require all developers to identify all conservation/preservation
areas and submit all appropriate information to regulatory agencies.
Policv 6.1.9.5: The City shall maintain the following minimum requirements to all required .
preserve areas for environmentally significant lands.
Lands to be set aside in preserve areas shall be:
a. Identified based on the quality of habitats, the presence of listed species, proximity
to other natural areas and other relevant factors.
b. Preserved in viable condition, with intact canopy, understor_y, and ground cover, and
maintained without infringement by drainage or utility easements.
cs Platted as separate parcels of land.
d. Of highest quality, capable of functioning within itself or in conjunction with
manmade features.
e. Clearly defined, protected and managed in such a way that it serves a purpose to the.
communities around it.
f. Contiguous, wherever possible, to an adjacent preserve, public park, school site, or
human-made open space or combination thereof.
g Maintained as large open or green areas with the intent of preserving large areas to
promote self - sustaining, balanced plant growth, biodiversity, and wildlife
enhancement and shall be connected with other preserve areas to conceptually
function as wildlife corridors.
CONSERVATION 1/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 6 -11
h. One - hundred - percent protected from alteration during site construction.
i. Compact in nature, avoiding strip or noncontiguous patterns and arranged in a
continuous fashion where possible. The use of preservation areas as long, narrow
buffers is discouraged.
Protecting and preserving of all endangered and threatened plant, animal and marine
populations and the habitat of critical value to regional populations of endangered
and threatened species.
k. Consistent with South Florida Water Management District regulations, such that a
minimum 15 -foot upland buffer composed of native vegetation shall be preserved or
established around wetland areas landward from the edge of the wetland in all places
and shall average 25 feet of width from the landward edge of the wetland.
1. Cleared of invasive nonnative vegetation (e.g., Brazilian pepper, Australian pine and
Melaleuca), except as otherwise authorized by the city, by the developer at the time
of development or redevelopment of a site.
Lands that are set aside in a preserve status may be included in open space calculations for
nurrnoses of meeting open space requirements of the city's planned community district or
planned unit development ordinances if the canopy, understor_y, and ground cover vegetation
are left intact. However, such preserved lands shall not make up more than 50 percent of the
total required open space, unless it is determined by the city council that a greater portion of
the required open space should consist of preserved area because of special site constraints
or preservation opportunities. .
(2) Alteration within the preserve shall require City approval, and shall be limited to:
1. The construction of boardwalks, pervious walkways, and other passive
recreational or educational facilities.
2. The construction of firebreaks, fire lanes, or fence lines and the removal of
invasive nonnative species and their replacement with native species. The use
of native plant communities, existing roads and trails, etc., as firebreaks is
preferred to the construction of new access roads or fire lanes, which would
result in the introduction and spread of invasive nonnative plant species.
3. Primary_ public /institutional buildings shall be prohibited in the conservation
land use designation and within other environmentally sensitive lands,
including wetlands, 100 -_year floodplains, groundwater aquifer recharge areas,
areas set aside by the development to meet the 25- percent preservation of
CONSERVATION 1/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 6 -12
native ecological communities and wildlife habitats, unless otherwise
approved by the city council.
Policv 6.1.9.6: The City shall maintain the following minimum requirements to require a.
manaLyement plan for all preservation areas and/or conservation lands.
j A management plan of the preserve area and/or any other conservation areas within the city
shall include but not be limited to long -term protection of the preserve /conservation area,
continued removal of and protection from litter and debris, avoidance of activities or land
alteration which may disturb the preserve area, eradication and continued monitoring and
removal of invasive nonnative plant species, control of off -road vehicles, and maintenance
of hydrological requirements. Periodic prescribed burning or other mechanical methods that
would simulate the natural processes of the natural historic fire regime may be required for
some areas.
Each management plan shall be approved, pursuant to Comprehensive Plan Policies and land
development regulations by the department, before final approval of construction drawings
or commencement of land alteration, whichever occurs first, and /or incorporation into the
city as a conservation area, open space, greenway, or wildlife corridor.
U Deed restrictions.
(1) For those lands identified for preserve status, appropriate deed restrictions shall be
placed on the lands and recorded in the public records of the county, or they may be
dedicated to a public entity or approved private conservation group for the purposes
of preservation, or appropriate restrictive conservation easements granted in
perpetuity may be established, or such other similar protective measures may be
established, as determined by the city council, upon completion of all review
processes.
A conservation easement shall be established for a preserve area on a single - family
residential lot five acres or greater in size. The deed restriction or conservation
easement shall be dedicated to the appropriate entity,.such as the property owners
association, or a state or local government or agency.
The perpetual maintenance and protection of designated preserve areas shall be established
by a legally binding, recorded instrument.
CONSERVATION 1/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 6 -13
Policv 6.1.9.7: The City shall provide for a voluntary density bonus program for land use
designations of residential high (RH) to permit densities up to 15.0 units per gross acre, based on one
additional unit of density allowed for every ten percent of native ecological habitat put into a
preserve within the planned community district (PCD) up to a maximum of 15.0 units per gross acre.
These preserve areas shall be over and above the minimum preservation and open space areas
provided in accordance with standard PCD requirements.
Policv 6.1.9.8: The City shall maintain in the land development regulations requiring the removal
of invasive nonnative species from preserve areas and development tracts.
CONSERVATION 1/98
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT 6 -14
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT
Goals, Objectives and Policies
GOAL 7.1.: ADEQUATE RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE FACILITIES AND AREAS
OFFERING A BROAD RANGE OF ACTIVITIES, CONVENIENT ACCESS,
APPROPRIATE IMPROVEMENTS, AND SOUND MANAGEMENT SHALL BE
PROVIDED TO ALL CITIZENS OF PALM BEACH GARDENS WITH ACTIVE AND
PASSIVE RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES IN THE INTERESTS OF PERSONAL
HEALTH, ENTERTAINMENT, AND CONSTRUCTIVE USE OF LEISURE TIME.
Objective 7.1.1.: The City shall provide active and passive recreation facilities and areas for
residents of Palm Beach Gardens in a timely manner so as to comply with the level of service
standards set forth by this element and to maintain such compliance in subsequent years.
Policy 7.1.1.t.: The City shall adopt a level of service standard of 15 3_7 acres of improved
neighborhood and community parks for each 1,000 permanent City residents. Parks and recreation
facilities shall be located to serve the entire city population, which in most cases will be in the urban
area.
Policy 7.1.1.2.: The City shall achieve the level of service standard set forth in this element through
an equitable and systematic land acquisition program and impact fee program.
Policy 7.1.1.3.: iii ucc;.ru�,:.cc via 1 Jl Vl1Vll 1VJ.JLVL, F.S., t -The City shall rc �::,v�, wid rc V I l Xl
:.cc: ;;a: y, continue to provide land development regulations tc ::.corpG ate which contain recreation
and open space definitions as defined below and level of service standards as defined above.
Neighborhood Park
The neighborhood park is a "walk to" park. generally located along streets where people can walk or bicycle without
encountering heavy traffic. It serves the population of a neighborhood in a radius of up to one -half mile and generally
has 2 acres for each 1,000 population. The desirable size is 15 acres.
Because the service areas of a neighborhood park and an elementary school often coincide, it is desirable for the
neighborhood park to physically join the elementary school when feasible. Both park and school serve the same basic
nonulation, share compatible land uses, and maintain recreation facilities that are of mutual benefit.
Since recreation needs vary one neighborhood to another, site design should be flexible in order to meet the
particular recreation needs of a neighborhood. Site design should also reflect the character of a neighborhood and
incoroorate compatible elements of both passive and active types of recreation. The park area should be suitable for
intense recreational activities. Typical facilities developed in a neighborhood park may include play apparatus,
RECREATION 7-1
AND OPEN SPACE 7/97
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
recreation buildings, multipurpose courts, sports fields, picnic areas, and free play areas, Additional facilities may be
added depending on the recreation demands of a neighborhood..
Community Park
A community park is a "ride to" park located near major streets or arterials. It is designed to serve the needs of four to
six neighborhoods - which may be said to constitute a community - and serves community residents within a radius of
up to to three miles. Non - vehicular access to community parks is an important aspect of these parks. Non - vehicular
access can be enhanced by bike paths and pedestrian walkways. A minimum of 25 acres for each community park is
recommended, with acreage needs based on an optimum standard of 5 acres per 1,000 population. A community park
offers a wide range of programs and facilities for individuals and families. Just as a neighborhood park fulfills the
recreation needs of a neighborhood, a community park is designed to meet the recreation needs of an entire community.
The park area should be suitable for intense recreational activities. Typical facilities at a community park include
swimming pools, ball fields, tennis courts, play areas, picnic areas, multi - purpose courts, recreation buildings. and sports
fields. Additional recreation facilities may be included to meet a particular recreation demand in a community.
Adequate off - street parking may be needed to contain parking overflow. Two important elements of every
park are the use of landscaping and the provision of passive recreation areas.
Urban - District Park
While maintaining a level of neighborhood and community parks, the City also wishes to include one or more district
parks into the recreational system, An urban - district park is designed to serve the recreation needs of several
communities, or a city and usually provides areas and facilities that are resource based. The park area may contain
natural or aesthetic quality for outdoor recreation, such as picnicking. boating. fishing, swimming. camping and trail
uses, as well as active play areas. A secondary objective may be the conservation and management of the
natural /cultural environment, providing- opportunities for viewing. studying nature acid wildlife habitat, The minimum
desirable size for an urban - district park is 200 acres.
The most imnortant aspect of an urban - district park is that it provides recreational opportunities that are resource based.
Design and development of all outdoor recreation resources and facilities should promote an atmosphere of beauty and
serenity that is based directly on the natural environment.
Specialized Recreational Facilities
These sites will vary widely in size and the number of residents served. Examples of specialized facilities would include
marinas, libraries, swimming pools, zoos, nature centers, outdoor theaters and publicly -owned golf courses. Specialized
facilities may be appropriate in combination with a community or urban - district park.
Objective 7.1.2.: Public funds, gifts and contributions, mandatory fees and /or deductions, and
other means shall be used to meet the recreation and open space needs (defined by the level of
service standards above) of Palm Beach Gardens.
RECREATION 7-2
AND OPEN SPACE 7/97
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
Policy 7.1.2.1.: The City shall cnact continue a fully operational impact fee program by T_ y :,
and shall supplement recreation and open space needs through interlocal agreements,
operational practices, user fees, incentives, and public /private cooperative efforts. The City shall
also develop a comprehensive implementation program with priorities, responsibilities, and
schedules based on dual level of service standards (park land and recreation facilities) by 3anuary
1, 1992 September 1. 1998.
Policy 7.1.2.2.: The City shall maintain a detailed recreation and open space inventory which
indicates the general location of existing and proposed sites and facilities as well as functional
classifications, nature of improvements, and usage, size, priority, and other appropriate
considerations.
n I! _ . " 1 ^f R . :« t « 4L a:..« 1 L'1 911 L11 r O aL.. ,.:a_. _1_11 —A.. «a
1 uJLIP,j /.1.lr.✓.• 111 GLL+L+VlLaw1LILJ YV llll JLi L+ll Vll 1VJ.JLVL, 1 .LJ., Llll+ LilLy J11U11 GLLLVFL wl V1 U111LL11L.Li VV111L+11
:,7,. «a:C.,... T !1Q ..,_ ..:_,..,,,, «4,. t ..: ...7 «..Lt:— ------ 4:,.« F ..:t:a: -- a_ L._ « .:,t...] : ,_LL....L..._. t
lUlil1L1114J L\l LJ 1L,LJL111L,111Li11LJ LV1 1111FIV V VU 1JUV11LJ 1L.Li1 L.LLUVlI "111L1VJ LV VV FLv V lULiU III 11Li1611VV111VVLI
Ul1U L+Vllllll Ulll L�' 1./(1113.
Objective 7.1.3.: The City shall provide vehicular and pedestrian access to all public, active,
recreation facilities, including barrier -free design features at entrance points to the facility
such as buildings used for group assembly, spectator seating areas, and restrooms.
Policy 7.1.3.1.: The City shall acquire and. develop access easements or rights -of -way as required
to provide adequate access for public recreation facilities, and construct access ways which are
compatible with the character and needs of the facility, as well as being harmonious with
surrounding development patterns.
Policy 7.1.3.2.: The- City shall coordinate with Palm Beach County and surrounding municipalities
to achieve public access to Atlantic Ocean beaches.
Objective 7.1.4: The City shall improve and coordinate efforts with all levels of government
and the private sector to provide recreational opportunities.
Policy 7.1.4.1: By 1991, The City shall assess t .c : usihi:ity cf ; :ltc:i:lg i:lto an continue
interaeency agreements with the School Board for the joint use of school recreation facilities located
in the City.
RECREATION 7-3
AND OPEN SPACE 7/97
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
Policy 7.1.4.2: The City shall enforce the dedication of park and recreation area through the
_U -3 a.0 �u0u:V:3iorl land development regulations' development approval process. As a
minimum, residential projects shall set aside 489 600 square feet per dwelling unit for public parks
and recreation purpose. Non - residential projects shall set aside a percentage of the gross project
area as established pursuant to Policy 7.1.4.4. Money in lieu of land dedication, subject to City
Council approval, shall serve as an alternative where suitable land is not available within
development projects for public park purposes; minimum park thresholds, as defined in Policy
7.1.1.3., cannot be achieved; or off -site land is not appropriate to serve the recreation and open space
needs of the subject development.
Policy 7.1.4.3: The City shall seek land donations from property owners and financial contributions
from the private sector for the development of recreational opportunities.
Policy 7.1.4.4: By March, 1999, the City shall conduct a user survey of park and recreation facilities.
The data from the survey shall be used to determine the percentage of land non - residential projects
shall contribute as recreation dedication requirements. At a minimum, the survey shall document
use of city parks and recreation facilities by residents and nonresidents, and the origin and
destination of each user before and after the park/recreation facility use.
RECREATION 7-4
AND OPEN SPACE 7/97
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT
Goals. Obiectives and Policie$
GOAL 8.1.:: ESTABLISH EFFECTIVE COORDINATION MEASURES AMONG ALL
PERTINENT PUBLIC AND QUASI - PUBLIC ENTITIES SO TO BEST MAINTAIN PALM
BEACH GARDENS' QUALITY OF LIFE AND EFFICIENT USE OF RESOURCES.
Objective 8.1.1.: �'- nnn i_W2 -L The Citv shall continue to maintain formal specific
B 1776, Galal/llall _ ,
means of coordination with adjacent municipalities, the county, state, and federal agencies
who have permitting and regulating authority, and quasi- public entities which provide
services but lack regulatory authority in Patin Beach Gardens.
Policy 8.1.1.1.: The City, through its involvement with Seacoast Utility Authority and in
conjunction with the City Engineer, shall review all plans for water and sewage systems when
these improvements are to be maintained by the city after construction.
Policy 8.1.1.2.: The City shall notify Palm Beach County and surrounding municipalities in
writing (prior to the application being considered by the City Planning and Zoning Commission
Beard) of all development applications received by the City requiring a Development Review
Committee meeting.
Policy 8.1.1.3.: Palm Beach Gardens shall request that the state regulatory agencies create
liaisons with the City. For example, the SFWMD recently implemented a program which has
assisted liaison within the county.
Policy 8.1.1.4.: Through the City Council, the City Manager shall be responsible for ensuring
an effective intergovernmental coordination program for Palm Beach Gardens.
Policy 8.1.1.5.: The City shall utilize request -timt the Palm Beach Countywide Intergovernmental
Coordination Process provide as a regular formal forum in which to deal with issues unique to
Palm Beach County and the municipalities therein.
Policy 8.1.1.6.: The City shall request that the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
(TCRPC) play a more active role in issues between the City and Palm Beach County, and between
federal and state agencies and Palm Beach Gardens.
Policy 8.1.1.7.: Palm Beach Gardens shall assist with cooperative education programs between
the City, the county, and regulatory agencies to inform the public and development community
INTERGOVTAL COORDINATION 8 -1
11/97 EAR -based Amendment
I
about applicable laws and regulations. This could be accomplished by including brief
informational pamphlets in utility bills or other means of widespread general circulation.
Policy 8.1.1.8.: Palm Beach Gardens shall identify and coordinate anticipated future annexation
areas with the county and surrounding municipalities.
Policy 8.1.1.9: The City shall use the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's informal
mediation process to resolve disputes or conflicts, including annexation issues, with other local
governments, if not resolved through the Palm Beach Countywide Intergovernmental Coordination
Process. When the City's efforts fail to resolve a dispute with any local government, the City shall
notify the Regional Planning Council in writing about the dispute, requesting the Council's
mediation. The City shall also notify the local government that the City has dispute with, about
the City's request to the Regional Planning Council.
Policy 8.1.1.10: The City shall cooperate with the County's Commission on Affordable Housing
to implement countywide affordable housing programs, including the use of Housing Trust Fund
monies.
Objective 8.1.2.: Boy 177v, W1u1una 1 Q 1111.a.11cuuJ11 vi Through 17PARC. TCRPC and informal
communications. the Citv shall continue coordinating all levels of service standards' which
affect surrounding municipalities and counties.
Policy 8.1.2.1.: The City shall monitor the implementation development of county-wide traffic
performance standards.
Policy 8.1.2.2.: The City shall coordinate the timing, location, and capacity of public facilities
to ensure that required services will be available when needed.
Policy 8.1.2.3.: The City shall involve the TCRPC in informal mediation when level of service
issues cannot be resolved by the city and the service provider.
Objective 8.1.3.: Ly �»U, Estau:ls ; Through IPARC. TCRPC and informal
communications. the City Shall continue a written procedure to request coordination with the
comprehensive plans of adjacent municipalities, the county, and other units of local
government such as the school board, who provide services but do not have regulatory
authority over the use of land.
Policy 8.1.3.1.: The City shall file a written request with each adjacent municipality and the
county to receive and review copies of all proposed comprehensive plans or plan amendments that
INTERGOVTAL COORDINATION 8 -2
11/97 EAR -based Amendment
are adjacent to Palm Beach Gardens' boundaries.
Policy 8.1.3.2.: The City shall request the School Board of Palm Beach County, Northern Palm
Beach Chamber of Commerce, Palm Beach County Planning Council, South Florida Water
Management District, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, Seacoast Utility Authority,
Northern Palm Beach County Improvement Water-Eeatral District, and Florida Power and Light
Company to designate a specific liaison to provide expertise from .their various disciplines into
planning and development - related activities.
Policy 8.1.3.3.: The City shall, in conjunction with other affected parties, evaluate the Capital
Improvements Element when it is undergoing annual review to determine if current funding is
proportional to services rendered.
Policy 8.1.3.4.: The City shall request joint planning between city staff and the School Board on
proposed locations of future schools in relation to the projected population.
Objective 8.1.4.: ;y 193V, % �2 C:ty ;aU esL Ins ; Through IPARC. TCRPC and informal
Gpmmunications, the Citv shall continue an intergovernmental coordination process to ensure
full consideration is given to the impacts of developments proposed in the City
Comprehensive Plan or by other governmental entities which affect the city.
Policy 8.1.4.1.: The City shall cooperate with the Palm Beach Countywide Intergovernmental
Coordination Process established in 1993 for the purpose of facilitating intergovernmental
coordination.
Policy 8.1.4.2.: The city shall support the development and adoption of interlocal agreements
with the affected municipalities to coordinate the management of the Intracoastal Waterway and
the Loxahatchee Slough.
Policy 8.1.4.3.: The City Council shall continue to work with the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council to identify regional issues and to assist in the periodic updating of the
Eneherisive Strategic Regional Policy Plan.
Policy 8.1.4.4.: The city shall support the development of interlocal agreements with affected
parties and the Northern Palm Beach County Improvement District to coordinate
the funding of infrastructure in the North County area.
Policy 8.1.4.5: The City shall forward copies of the City's proposed Comprehensive Plan or plan
amendment to each adjacent city, Palm Beach County, the School Board of Palm Beach County,
Palm Beach Countywide Intergovernmental Coordination Process, South Florida Water
Management District, Seacoast Utilities Authority, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council,
and the Department of Community Affairs for their review and comments. The City shall take
INTERGOVTAL COORDINATION 8 -3
11/97 EAR -based Amendment
into consideration comments received from the above entities prior to the adoption of the Plan or
plan amendment.
Obiective 8.1.5.: Through IPARC. TCRPC. the Citv's Education Advisory Board and
informal communications, the Citv shall encourage the provision of anality education through
world class curriculum to ensure all children are prepared for real world exp_ eriences_. hold
necessary skills for iobs. and continue to pursue knowledge.
Policv 8.1.5.1.: The City shall undertake efforts to encourage and promote a quality educational
experience tailored to individual students needs, through communications with the School Board
and local school administrators. and urge that the followinLy should be provided: diverse learning
styles tailored to students' abilities: magnet schools and special. programs; skilled, devoted
teachers: involvement of volunteers and community resource$, Similarly, programs, strategies
and practices such as the following will be encouraged: reduction of school and individual
classroom size: selection of administrators with strone leadership and managerial skills; proper
allocation of fiscal resources: teaching focus on basic iob and em_plovment skills: and proMotion .
Of parental involvement and awareness.
Policv 8.1.5.2.: The City shall promote and encourage through communications with the School
Board. with assistance from the City's Education Advisory Board and coordination with
neighboring eovernments through the Interlocal Plan Amendment Review Committee and Issues
Forum. a form of school concurrencv to ensure educational facilities are available when and where
needed. and the division of the county school district into separate, smaller districts,
Policv 8.1.5.3.: To implement Obiective 8.1.5 and Policies 8j.5.1 and 8.1.5.2, the City shall _
assume an active role in reforming the education system. The City shall formulate consensus,
through resident input. on the maior educational issues for the Citv and meet regularly with the
School Board to advise them of the City's needs and recommend strategies or programs to address
the identified needs. Further. the City will assert itself as an outspoken leader. and utilize the
talents and influence of the community to urge changes to the educational system. At a minimum.
the City shall continue to monitor its activities which have potential impact on the educational
process and will coordinate accordingly with School Board staff.
Policv 8.1.5.4.: The City shall coordinate the location of new and expanded sites for Public
Educational Facilities with the School Board in order to ensure compatibility and consistency with
the Citv's Comprehensive Plan. in accordance with 235.193. F.S.. and to maintain and enhance
Joint planning processes and procedures for coordination and development of public school
facilities concurrent with residential development and other services. Public educational facilities
shall be sited as discussed in the, Future Land Use Element.
INTERGOVTAL COORDINATION 8 -4
11/97 EAR -based Amendment
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ELEMENT
Goals, Objectives and Policies
GOAL 9.1.: PALM BEACH GARDENS SHALL UNDERTAKE ACTIONS NECESSARY
TO ADEQUATELY PROVIDE NEEDED PUBLIC FACILITIES TO ALL RESIDENTS
WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION SO AS TO PROTECT INVESTMENTS IN EXISTING
FACILITIES, MAXIMIZE THE USE OF EXISTING FACILITIES, AND PROMOTE
ORDERLY, COMPACT DEVELOPMENT.
Objective 9.1.1.: The City of Palm Beach Gardens shall use the Capital Improvements
Element of this Comprehensive Plan as a means to ensure the construction of Capital
Facilities, necessarily to accommodate desired growth with the Future Land Use Element, and
to replace obsolete or worn out Facilities.
Policy 9.1.1.1.: The City shall include in Five -Year Schedule of Capital Improvements all capital
facility projects(renewal and replacement) needed for level of service maintenance which are over
T._il.___.: «,_ aL., CL%4%. «a:._« LIA10
f$n50,000 In estimated costs L V11V YY lllg LLlV uLLV1J L1V11 Vl LLl1J �Vllll,l V11V11J1YV 11GL11, LLlV �1L�' J11U11
Vonsu1L Lla lV �1LJ,J %- aplaLai i1111J1 V Y V111V11LJ 1J1V111L 11L FlIVI iv Lla l�l uiJiL V V rLI vi Ully iaYiLUI 1111y1 V Y V111V1IL
..r.._.,._ Q+CA AAA : «a,. «,7 ,_.7 a.. ,._. ._ «,7 ,.....,. 1--- ._._ :a._1 4r--:I.'4:
,...
1111LLllVllls VL LJYVl .v ✓V,VVV 1lILV11LLVLL LV VAyLLL1LL Vl "'Fl"A, VuIJ1LU11uV111L1V.J and the City shall review
said Schedule during the preparation of the annual budget.
1D.. 1 :.__. n 1 1 It T I _1_.,7.�. « «,1 ..a._,]:..,.... . a,.: «i....Y .. «a «..t: ,.: ,.,. ,:aL:_.. a1_- _
1 G C_ /.1.1.i... 111V111L1V FI%JrILUIIa LLLILL JLL%41%,a 11VVVJJUI �' LV I1111J1V111V11L F%JILV1VJ VYILLIIII "IV YUL1VUv
!'�,...... «- ,.L... «.,:_... Ttl..« O._L....1._l._ ..r T.« «..,__.._.Y
V 1V111V11LJ Vl LLlV l.�VllliJl V11V11J1 V V 1 lull 111 LLlV UVIIVLLL.LIV V11111FluY I 11VJV 1JLVS1LLL11J CULL JLLLIIlVv
shall(ail L.. «_.:....:a:.....,] _..UI"VLLILy
VV y11V1111LVLL LJUJVLL Vll JyVV111VLL LGLLSVL LLGLLVJ 1V1 VVlllylV L1V11, LLlV LLV GLllu V1111�' VL 1V V V11LLV LV 1LLL14
aL ,_,. ,_ « „a,. «,] .. ..a: ...« _ .:aL aL._ ...a,...a: ..« ,_ral_ _ «._Li:..l„ L. 141- __4C'_ «.] _ -141 --
LL1VJV 1JIVJVVLJ, LLL1LL assocIUL1V11 VYlLll LllV Ill LJLVVLILJII Vl LllV 1JLLVIIV J 11VU1L11, JLLLVLy1 L11LL YYVIL"LV.
in ..1 :..�. 'a 1 1 It . TL- ,._.._L ,. ,1 ,. «a: ,,« ,_r aL:,. 1,.« ._ -._.. a,. - !'�._ «:a._1. L« «,.,._,,...._�. «a.. !'+,..«..«:aa,_,.
1 VllV, /.1.1.J.. 11LLVUs11 L4LIVIJL1V11 Vl LLI10 1J1cL11, VIVULV u %,"F1LU1 L1111J1V VV111V111J l.J Vllulu LLVV
r a1_ 'C1\ d « ,11 :a .1 !L---A- ._L_ r
VV111 oscd Vl LlV V1Ly Iv Lanagc L,L«ll ULl uFFr'3P- 7I"LL. Li V1LLLL11V1«a 11VULLJ,
1V1 LllV 1JLLLIJVJV Vl VYUlu LLLllls
«,1 «l.: «� -A-- ,.r « ..:a_. „a.. ,..1 4r-- ,_t__.,:,.« a1__ C V,.,... C�„L._.1_,1.. ,.r
ullLL 1LLL11%.Ing 111 V1LLV1 Vl 1J1LVLILJ 1JLVjVVLJ FI%JFVJVLL 1V1 111V1uJ1V11 111 ulV ✓- 1 VcaL LJ Viibuuib Vl
T« «a
luli:/iv v \.lil\.11LJ.
Policy 9.1.1.24.: Proposed capital improvement projects shall be evaluated and
ranked in order of priority according to the following guidelines:
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -1
EAR -Based Amendments
1) Whether the project is financially feasible and is needed to protect public health and safety,
to fulfill the city's legal commitment to provide facilities and services, or to preserve or
achieve full use of existing facilities or to eliminate existing capacity deficits;
2) Whether the project increases efficiency of use of existing facilities, prevents or reduces
future improvement cost, provides service to developed areas lacking full service, or
promotes infill development; and
3) Whether the project represents a logical extension of facilities and services.
4) Whether the project is consistent with the location needs based on the projected growth
patterns, the accommodation of new development and redevelopment facility needs, and the
plans of state agencies and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) that provide
public facilities within the City's jurisdiction.
5) Whether the project is consistent with the Urban Growth Boundary of urban vs.
rural characteristics and service provision.
Objective 9.1.2.: Future development shall bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements
necessitated by the development in order to maintain adopted LOS standards.
Policy 9.1.2.1.: The City shall continue to collect a countywide transportation impact fee to assess
new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance transportation improvements
necessitated by such development and shall consider adopting a city road impact fee for
neiahorborhood collectors and local roads of City responsibility.
Policy 9.1.2.2.: The City shall continue its YYiii, " LL1111 %" Y"" vi cA`%JF 1V11, ullylVlllVllt u program
of ;:r mandatory dedications or fees in lieu of as a condition of development approval for the
provision of recreation and open space.
Policy 9.1.2.3.: �I 7 "L:.. ll% , F a Y,: _ Y y- L n� ,The City shall periodically
YY 1LL1111 VllV VGLL Vl GNAV L1V11 Vl LLlV �Vlll 1V11%111J1 Y L, 1 1CLL1
�:::� vvllll�llVl�t ��uA j Lv review the ila u �� adequacy of impact fees levied to fund the following
capital facilities needed to support new growth:
1) Park and recreation sites and facilities; and
2) Law enforcement and emergency services; and
JJ 1 1.LV11\+ Vli11U111SJ.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -2
EAR -Based Amendments
Objective 9.1.3.: The city shall manage its fiscal resources to ensure the provision of needed
capital improvements for previously issued development orders and for future development
and redevelopment.
Policy 9.1.3.1.: The City's Capital Improvements Program shall include funding for those capital
facilities and programs which do not exceed the city's fiscal capacity.
Policy 9.1.3.2: The City will adopt a Capital Improvements Program covering at least 5 fiscal
years and annual capital budget as a part of the City's budgeting process.
Policy 9.1.3.3.: The City will make efforts to secure grants or private funds whenever available
to finance the provision of capital improvements.
Policy 9.1.3.4.: L,.L. LL - : ll« ls - +1__ « «- ,, --- +L..• :,.._:,1 I- --
L1L1 IiV Y V1VF111411L C4FIJ1V YCLI V L Il, %-I L. YY .
111 1Lr LJLL11Le ICU r,V LLL YL 1Vtl111L 11W
--- :ILI- 1► d.. « :,.: «._7 0,..-.:..., T....: «,_ T T « : +.. /11 dOTT L.\ .. «.7
LV LLLL1lLL., YY 11L,11L. Y L.1 LL.CLJl V1Li, LYl LLillLiltlGL1 V Vl Y 1L,Li 1 GLAllls V i11LJ `1Y1V 1 V Jj CL11L4 lYl LLL1141j,JGLL V Vl Y 1NL.J
D,. «,.�+ T T «: +.. /A XODT T..\ ,.,. «,. ,_ +L ...7.. rl: «�. «,. : «„ .... '+,.1 :...,. _�._. .,,�.. «+,,.,. «_1
LL,11Ln114 V1LLJ `1YIVLVJf LLJ 111L+LL1VUJ VL LL11GLLll.uls L+U�,JlLLU u11y1V YL,111V11WLLLlll The City budget process
shall include the planning, development and review of projects which provide for the replacement
and renewal of capital facilities.
Policy 9.1.3.5: Through capital improvement programming, the City shall use its fiscal policies to
direct expenditures for capital improvements which are consistent with the goals, objectives, and
policies of other elements of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 9.1.3.6: 'TL.....__._L _.a+L _ «a __ a.,..y +L,. _.�_ ___ ,.r,,.,.,.,
11LLVLL�',11 LL.Li11111LiC11 L�VV1U111CLL1V11 YY1L11 CLLlli L UUF%11"LLV1111V111 L11%. VCCIJ%J L LLLilLJ Vl 1VY uI
SV YLi111111L.11L, LLLLll L�' L/Vlll�/GLL11L�J CLLll1 L11L1 t/11YCLLL. 0%A LVl, LL1Li %114.' YY111 1LLL111L11.' CULL.& 1111FI1,111L+11L NVJL-
cf ,cti.c t;,;,: l ,dues : ;; L111CL11Ld111 public L"cilit:c3. Should the bond referendum, identified as the
fundine source for needed capital improvements, Table 9A, fail the City shall amend the
comprehensive plan to identify alternative funding sources or to take other actions.
Objective 9.1.4.: Decisions regarding the issuance of development orders and permits shall
be based upon coordination of the development requirements included in this Plan, the land
development regulations, and the availability of necessary public facilities concurrent with the
impact of developments.
Policy 9.1.4.1U: The City of Palm Beach Gardens will maintain , consistent with Section
163.3202 (1), F.S., ar, uucKuutc uiciiiLico Gr"Inancc a concurrency management system to ensure
that, at the time a development order or a permit is issued, sufficient facility capacity is available or
will be available concurrent with the impacts of the development. These code requirements
or ..nL ncc will also ensure that adequate public facilities are available to serve developments for
which development orders were issued prior to the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -3
EAR -Based Amendments
Policy 9.1.4.1(b): The City shall require, through the concurrency management system, that the
burden of showing compliance with the level of service requirements be upon the anplicant fora
development permit. Where capacity cannot be shown, the following methods may be used to
maintain the adopted level of service:
L. The developer may provide the necessary improvements to maintain the level of service.
2. The proposed project may be altered such that the projected level of service complies with
the adopted level of service standard.
3. The proposed project may be phased such that the projected level of service at the conclusion
of each phase complies with the adopted level of service.
Policy 9.1.4.1(c): For the purpose of issuing a development order or permit, a proposed project may
be deemed to have a de minimis impact and may not be subject to concurrency requirements,
consistent with Countvwide Traffic Performance Standards, and notwithstanding Policy 2.1.1.1.
Specifically. the Level of Service D for the links listed on Table 2A which have a volume to
capacity ratio of greater than 1,00 therein may be exceeded by up to a total of five percent (5 %)
of Level of Service D as computed on an AADT basis. These roadway links eligible for the
excess five percent will be presumed to pass the average _peak hour test. This five percent shall
be the cumulative traffic from all proiects or project amendments approved increasing or
redistributing traffic for which application was made on or after February 1, 1990 based upon a.
model run. including the socio- economic data from such development. This excess five percent
shall be allocated on a first -come- first - served application -filed basis. provided no proiect may use
more than three -fifths (3 /5ths) of the five percent available on any other link based upon the.
proiect's traffic impact study. Notwithstanding the three percent (3 %) limitation as stated at the
bottom of Table 2F, net project trips within the maximum Radius of Development Influence shall
be accumulated toward the five percent allocation,
Policy 9.1.4.2.(a): The City hereby adopts the following Level of Service Standards (LOS) and
will use them in reviewing the impacts of new development upon facility provision. The Dual Level
of Service Standards shall be applied in the respective urban and rural areas, consistent with the
Urban Growth Boundary_ philosophy established in the Future Land Use Element:
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -4
EAR -Based Amendments
LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
PUBLIC SAFETY
Fire /ENT$
Police:
3.7 acres of improved
neiehborhood and
community perk$
Der 1.000 Dennpgnt
residents
5 minute resDon$g
time to 90% gf all
calls. on a district basis
1150 service calls Der officer
per vear;
Communitv Policine Philosonhv
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -5
EAR -Based Amendments
Park and recreation
facilities will be located
to serve the entire citv _
DoDulation. and in most
cases will be in the urban area.
Encouraee well - based
sDrinklers for all
structures: fire service with tanker
trucks: 8 minute avera¢e response
time.
Zone Datrol based on rural
crime control stpt�,gies
URBAN AREA
RURAL AREA
TRAFFIC CIRCULA'T'ION
Facility Type
LOS for Peak Period in Peak Season
Neiehborhood Collector
D
D
Citv Collegtgr
D
D
Countv Minor Arterial
D
D
State Minor Arterial
E
E
State Principal Arterial
D
D
FIHS Rgid$
D
D
Excepted Links per Table 2A
SEWAGE SERVICE
SANITARY SEWER
SEPTIC TANKS
107 eallons Der day
Per DEP and Public
Der capita
Health Department Reeulatign$
SOLID WASTE
Generation per capita;
7.13 lbs per dav
7.13 lbs Der day
Collection:
Twice Der week
Once per week
DRAINAGE
3 day. 25 vear event
3 day. 25 vear event
WATER SERVICE
POTABLE WATER
WATER WELL$
191 eallons Der dav
DEP and Public
per caDitA
Health Department Regulations
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
PUBLIC SAFETY
Fire /ENT$
Police:
3.7 acres of improved
neiehborhood and
community perk$
Der 1.000 Dennpgnt
residents
5 minute resDon$g
time to 90% gf all
calls. on a district basis
1150 service calls Der officer
per vear;
Communitv Policine Philosonhv
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -5
EAR -Based Amendments
Park and recreation
facilities will be located
to serve the entire citv _
DoDulation. and in most
cases will be in the urban area.
Encouraee well - based
sDrinklers for all
structures: fire service with tanker
trucks: 8 minute avera¢e response
time.
Zone Datrol based on rural
crime control stpt�,gies
Policy 9.1.4.2.(b): Public safety level of service standards are not a formal comnonent of the
concurrency management system required by Rule 9J- 5.0055. FAC, however, the Citv will monitor
the standards during the development review process. Anv project that necessitates expansion of
Public safety services beyond those provided in anv given fiscal _year, shall be required to participate,
in the burden of expanding police and fire /ems services to serve the subject property, or shall b;.
phased consistent with City plans to expand such services. Public safety facilities and/or capital
equipment that will provide the proposed development sufficient services based on the LOS for
police and fire /ems facilities may be required pursuant to a Developer's Agreement. Public safety
facilities and/or capital equipment dedicated to the City pursuant to a Developer's Agreement shall
be credited against impact fees.
Policy 9.1.4.2.(c): In 2000, the City shall evalvat? and consider adopting the ideal facility standards
as a component of the parks and recreation level of service standard and concurrencv management
system.
Policy 9.1.4.2.(d): With a super - majority vote of the City Council, alternative service mechanisms
or provision of services at 'urban' levels may be approved in the rural service area
Tn A T.`T!Tl" I-ITT) f" T TT A TT/IILT
11\L- 1111\i t.11 \IiVL[ -111 V1`I
L'._._: L'a_. T_. «... T /ld l - n,.,_L 0..,......11
1 GLV 111 L.' L YF%' LV V 1V1 1 VLLl\ 1 V11VLL 111 1 VLL11 UVUJVll
.,1Ly \,311L,NtVr
D
!" ,__. «a_, /"1._11._.. +.
n
V VLLLIL.' \- V11VVLV1
L
D
\iVLLL1LJ L71L%1II"L
V LULU IY1111LJ1 L71 LV11LL1
L
V L(1LV 1 1111V1JJLLl [ -11 LV11LL1
L
L11111LVL1 ALVVVJJ 1 LLV111LJ
L
C A ATTT A TIN/ C�TTT7TT7
U1 -11 \11L "11 \1 UL YY Ll�
/V gal!G11J /l1LL.' /`FIL"
0 r%T TT\ ITT A QTT'
UV L1L
YT AV 1L
%_J LL U"&., - /.VJ 1V. 1 LLU.' /VCJJ1Lu
1 GLLLL LLV VIIJ- 1.1V 1V. 1 capita
LV Y V1V j.JlllVll LJ Sl VLLLVl LL1GLL1 1 V GLVI VJ - ✓ LL4� � L✓- �'�VLLL V Y VIlL
aL._« 1 n ... car .._ 1-y
LV Y V1VtJ111V11 LJ 1VJJ LL1K11 1 V GLVl VJ - 1 LLGL,' � L.✓ -� VLLL V Y Vllt
nl1T A T)T U ITT A TT,7
1 V 1 11L LL V L-11 Ll%.
nom► ,...11., «,. /a,__. /�.._: +„
lL SC111V11J /LLGLJ /VGLFILU
n T71-17-1 T7 A'rrnAT AATTI /lT)T?TLT On A r17'
1W li1WL711V1\ L71 \L VA LA VA
T«.. «..,._.....] ..LL... -L ._...] «.l «a. -1_.. «..L: 7 R G 1 Ann
11111./1V YVd ncig 1VV111VVLL LLL1Ll VV111111LLL11L.' F LLl\J VV111V11IV4- ✓.✓ LLVI ICJ �JVl I,VVV �/V1111LLL1V11L
:A «4
1VJlliV11L3.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -6
EAR -Based Amendments
nT TT1T Tf" O A TT'TXJ
l %Ji JLL%_ V[-LA Ll 1
n.._n..1_nT CnnCG /1\/..\ TAn : +: ._ ♦ +L ++L 1 _. 1 C . _a _a + L1: L_a:
1 VL 1 \Lily ✓- ✓.VVJ ✓�l��u�, 1 l-1\-, 14, 1J 11VL 11L, L, L,JJUi �' LL1uL LL1L, 1L,YL,l VL JL,1 Y1L,L, JLGLLlucLL UJ L,J LLlV11J11L,u 111
n 1 It A ..F+L.. n..Lt:.. 0_r a . 171___ L,....�,.a �_: 4.. +L ..:........ ..C..
�JV 11L,1L,J 1 V.1 .L.1 -1 V.1.L.T VL Lum, 1 LLVlllr VLLLLi LJ L1Lr111L,11L VV 111L,L P11V1 LV LL1L, 1JJL1GL111,L, VL LL %4 S Y%1l%JF111L,llL
a :+
%Jl%A% 1 GLLlu JJV1iu1L.
Policy 9.1.4.3.: The City shall, consistent with Section 163.3202 (1), F.S., uucY< a l V:LaL111GLllt �r
maintain regulations that will allow phasing of a development and issuing of a development order
for projects that are phased to ensure that the necessary public facilities and services are available
prior to the completion of the proposed development.
Policy 9.1.4.4.: Certificates of occupancy will be issued only after all required public facilities
needed to meet the adopted level of service standards are in place.
Policy 9.1.4.5.: As a result of the annual capital improvement programming process in which a
previously scheduled improvement project drops in priority and was the basis for the approval of a
development order, affected developments may proceed subject to the requirement established in
Policy 9.1.4.4 above. No such previously scheduled improvement project shall be removed from
this element's Schedule of Improvements or delayed more than once unless it can be proved the need
no longer exists. Any delay in the funding of any scheduled improvement shall not exceed one
program year.
Policy 9.1.4.6: The City shall limit its total debt service expenditures to no more than 20% of total
revenue and limit total outstanding indebtedness to no more than 10% of its property tax base, 'A::c.
,.:a_.. %JL C4% ,.._+:.... ,.laL%, !"�.....,..__,.L,.....:_.,. I LU4 .. +..1.1:.,1..
VlL�' YY 111, YY111111 V11L, yL. L.L1 Vl uuViJ LlVal VL LL1L, \i V111�J1 L,11L,11J1YL, 11GLL1, L,J LGLV11J11.
I N T :...,.,a :..__ __ +1__ . ..1 ..,._.,........ L.._a,. - ..a - .r +- +..1 ,1„L+
1 J L11111LUL1V11J Vll LL1L, LLJL+ Vl 1L, YN1ILLL, VV11L10 GLJ GL �/L,1 L,L,11L VL LVLGLL uL,VL.
L� lY1GLAl111LLL11 1GLL1V VL IV IGLl uL, V L LV LV lGLL
')\ A,T.._.:.Y._...,. ..F....l_. __a:_- :�a...L +_a_,.,... +._ .- ....i +__. L..--
J f LV,GLAl111LLL111GLLl%J VL %J"LJLGLLl%Alllr� 111L4L0VLN%ALl%100 LV JJLVF. XL,' LC 000%1.
AN 11 1:-:-- r _ 1L. �t �+ -a t _r
f
T A V11L,1L,J LVl L11L, 1L,t/1GLL,V111L,11L CLLlll 1L,11NYYCLl VL %,UF1LCLL 1.uL1111L1L10.
Policy 9.1.4.7.: The City shall evaluate proposed plan amendments and requests for new
development or redevelopment according to the following guidelines as to whether the proposed
action would:
1) Contribute to a condition of public hazard as may be described in the Sanitary Sewer, Solid
Waste, Drainage, Potable Water, and Natural Groundwater Recharge (Infrastructure)
Element, and Coastal Management Element of this Comprehensive Plan;
2) Exacerbate any existing or projected condition of public facility capacity deficits, as may be
described in the support documents of the Transportation �': "'LLIy Element;
Sanitary Sewer, Solid Waste, Drainage, Potable Water, and Natural Groundwater Recharge
(Infrastructure) Element; Public Safety Element; and Recreation and Open Space Element
of this Comprehensive Plan;
3) Generate public facility demands that may be accommodated by capacity increases planned
in the 5 -Year Schedule of Improvements; and
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -7
EAR -Based Amendments
4) Conform with future land uses as shown on the Future Land Use Map of the Future Land
Use Element of this Comprehensive Plan.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION
This section addresses public facility deficiencies for which the city has financial responsibility in
accordance with Rule 9J- 5.005(1)(c) and 9J- 5.016(4), Florida Administrative Code. As
discussed in the other elements of this Comprehensive Plan, there are only limited facilities for
which the city has financial responsibility. These include all local roads and two collectors,
a limited drainage network, police, fire /ems, and recreational facilities. Major transportation
links and potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, and drainage systems are under the
jurisdiction of other public agencies. Thus, while some of these systems have existing and projected
deficiencies, they are the financial responsibility of other agencies. As a result, these system
deficiencies will not be addressed in this section.
T: Rf Ci. CUJLaL:;,n Transportation
All arterial roads within the city belong to either the county or the state. The city is responsible for
only the local streets and two collectors. 'N'Gric Only one of these city facilities have either an
existing deficiency or a deficiency projected within the next five years. As is discussed further
in the Transportation Element, Burns Road cannot be expanded to its planned cross - section until I -95
is widened and the Burns Road underpass is of a width appropriate fora 4 -lane collector. This I -95
improvement will not occur within the next five _years, therefore Burns Road is a temporarily
constrained facility. The only expenditures necessary for the city -owned street system are ongoing
maintenance. The maintenance costs are covered under the operations portion of the city budget
and do not meet the cost threshold ($50,000), established by this Comprehensive Plan to be
classified as capital improvements.
The City's traffic standards, concurrency management system and the Countywide Traffic
Performance Standards require deficiencies and needs to be met prior to additional impact. Should
project - generated roadway needs occur in the future, the City shall require as a condition of
approval, all improvements to be programmed for completion or be carried out by the specific
development(s).
Sanitary Sewer and Potable Water
The potable water and sanitary sewer systems within the city are owned by the Seacoast Utility
Authority (Utility Authority). The Utility Authority was previously under private ownership but
was reeent4y purchased by a consortium of cities, including Palm Beach Gardens, and the county.
However, the Utility Authority is a separate entity with its own revenues, expenditures, and staff.
Therefore, the City of Palm Beach Gardens has no fiscal responsibility concerning the
operation, maintenance or expansion of the potable water or sewer systems.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -8
EAR -Based Amendments
Solid Waste
Through the use of an independent contractor, the City of Palm Beach Gardens provides residential
solid waste pick -up. However, under statutory agreement, all solid waste generated in the city
must be taken to facilities owned and operated by the Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County
(SWA). Thus, the city has no financial responsibilities for any solid waste disposal facilities.
Drainage Surface Water Management
The city owns portions of a small drainage system located in the oldest portions of the city. No
existing deficiencies have been identified, as the existing development meets the established level
of service standards. While the areas served by the facilities are almost builtout, any redevelopment
or new development will conform with the level of service standards established for new
development. Therefore, no deficiencies are projected. Sub -basin drainage studies and post- October
1995 flood system assessments may identify improvements needed to maintain level of service. A
few of these improvements may be needed in the City's limited portion of the surface water
management system. 71 lic At this time, the only expenditures necessary for the system are ongoing
maintenance.
The maintenance costs are covered under the operations portion of the city budget and do not meet
the cost threshold ($50,000), established by this Comprehensive Plan to be classified as capital
improvements.
The remainder of the drainage system in the city is under the jurisdiction of the Northern Palm
Beach County Improvement `:'"LCL CiVll`I -G! District (NPBC`v, QD) who is responsible for the
system operation, maintenance, and expansion. Existing development conforms with the
established level of service standards, therefore, no deficiencies have been identified. All future
development areas of the city are expected to be serviced by NPBC`: 'CID systems. These systems
shall meet the level of service standards for new development.
Recreation
The City of Palm Beach Gardens is entirely responsible for providing recreation facilities to
residents of the city. The county provides some regional facilities in areas near the city; however,
the recreation level of service standard established by this plan includes only city -owned
neighborhood and community facilities. Therefore, the city is solely responsible for insuring
the level of service standard is met.
Table 7 -45 in the Recreation and Open Space Element Support Document of this Comprehensive
Plan indicates the city will have needs for additional improved park land during the next five _years.
'„ L. __._ ,_ I L c __I, , __ YL_,.:1 nnc As discussed in that element, this deficit is to be made -up
GL YY 111110.YV - 1V.V ---- -111 1�1J 111 1195.
through new development dedications and fees collected through the recently enacted a prGpG3;,u
recreation impact fee, tu JJ11W1 iv i
: iluv . The recreation impact fee is to be designed such
that all new development will contribute land and/or funds at a level necessary to maintain the
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -9
EAR -Based Amendments
adopted level of service of 3.7 3.5 acres of park land improved with recreation facilities per 1,000
permanent residents.
Table 9A indicates the amount of acreage and expenditures needed to address the projected narks
and recreation deficit. As the table shows, there are some land needs beginning in the year 2000.
This deficit may be eliminated through the improvement of an 8 -acre parcel on Howell Lane that
was dedicated to the City for recreation purposes, _yet remains vacant. The City also has a 9 -acre,
parcel which it just purchased on Lilac Street which is being planned for recreation facilities.
Improvement of this site will eliminate the projected deficiency in 2001, and reduce the need in
2002. L ..__ 1..,. :« 4L,. r,C , 4._ ._., :4 ,. _....,.. 1 (1l1C
1J V11V U�,ll JLU �JILLJ 1n10L111s ul LIlV l-LLJ LV VLLLIJ 1L Llu VUrll LUC �'VLLL iliJ
, 1 YYILL1V Ul
PairLL.FrV Y Vllcnts. cult' uuLL1L1 VL1GL1
The acreage needs are calculated by multiplying the projected population for
each year by the adopted level of service and then subtracting the inventory from the previous
year. The population projections are for the permanent population as shown in Table 1 -1-2 of the
Future Land Use Element. The precise location of the proposed park improvements cannot be
shown at this time since the park sites will be acquired and developed as the vacant land is
developed. Almost all of the park improvements shown in Table 9A are expected to be located east
of the Florida's Turnpike with a majority located east of I -95. All of the recreational improvements
as shown in Table 9A, are consistent with other elements of the Comprehensive Plan.
The cost per acre presented Table 9A is calculated by adding the projected land costs plus
improvement costs. For the purposes of this calculation, land is estimated to average $60,000
per acre and improvements at $95.000 W200,00� per acre for a total of $155.000 W2600,000 per acre
improved recreation facilities. The land costs used herein are based on the average value of an
acre of land within the City. LVV..„4 1._ «a 4- 4L._ ._:4.. 4r•..._Y ..
VllI 1GUlU %A%J11LLL1V11 LV 111V %,ALy 11Vall U yll'YL4LV 1VJ1LLV11L1CL1 LLV Y V1Vyl11l+lll.
The facility improvements costs are based on the estimated development costs of an acre of park
land according to calculations derived for the parks and recreation impact fee. 0L u lazgc acrd
• . - -1. ,. «.7 : „„ 1._,7.. 1,. „.7 ,.1.... -: «,_ L,.114:,.1.7.. ..._�,_ ., +:,.« ,_ „ +.... ..1
VV111111LU11 A llI�, JYY 111u11 JL.r LLV VV1,
1 __ -1 -1.: L_.. 4r --- ylUySV« V_Y4+ , W�. «5. LLLILL LILL1y UL 11 W.. «• ,.1:4:..... T..1 - --
11IVJV L.,0L1111UL4J YYVlV VVLU111VLL L1V111111LL11 %1IF1L11 L1VJ 1111 Ullll
D,.,.,.L /'�.... «a_. : «,_1__.7: «,_ LII, % -LLy ._rn..irl- n --- U..- .7,. „,. Depending on the amount of land and
1J VUV11 �VlLlll�', /11V1ULL111s 11 - vll�' VL 1 Ullll 1J---L VUl LLV11J.
number of facilities obtained and improved at any one time, economies of scale are expected that
may either reduce or exceed these projected costs.
O: „..,. 41__ « ,.,7...] ----- :._„ l ..:1:4:,.,. ._.. ,...a....] 4,. L._ ..1__.,_1,_ „._.7. ..r __ . I- ,,,. -I”
LJlllVV LLlV 11VVLLVLL 1VV1VUL1V11 lUVlll LIVJ UlV VA1JVVlVLL LV VV UV YV1Vj.JVLL UJ Flu;, Vl 11V YY lUl�',V -JVUlV
,7.__...1�. «„,... «a.. aL..:- 1,.....a:.. «,. ,. „.7 ..:._..• . „1_ „,...,« ..4 4L:,, a:.,«._ TL.. ,.:�. ,. „al_. L,.,. ,. ..,.1
LLV Y V1VtJ111V11LJ, LL1V11 1VVUL1V11a 1411LL J1L.V "I%., LlL1L%11V YY11 UL LL11J LllllV. 111%, V1LJ VLL11 V11LI y 11UJ JV Y Vl Ul
„4 ....._.... ....... ,...4: ..„ ,_F4L,_ ,_:4_, +L,.a ._ ,]....: .` „..4...7 4r--
_ :.]._ „a: ,.1 ..1 ._ „..:4: ....
YUVLLIlI LLL VUJ 111 LLlV 11VI LLIVl 11 �.lVl L1V11 VI. LLlV Vll.7 LLILLL ILLY 4VJ1�1IULVLL IVl YCLLILJUJ 1VJ1L1V11LI u LLV11J1LLVJ
« T --A TT__ Tt X-« Ta :..:« 4L ..,_.. .. .. aL._a .Y._..4 .,r 4L
Vll LLlV 1 ULLLLV LLU1LL VJV 11ALLF. LL 10 111 LLlV.7V arcas LL1UL 111VJL Vl L11V 11VVLLVLL 1VVIVULLVII lUVlllLLVJ
..a...] 4,. L,_ ._.. «..a..._,.4,..7 TL,_ 1......7 __.:11 ,.:aL..- L,_ ,7:- ,...al_. J _,7:._..a._.7 L_..7,._.,.1.. ««..,. „4
arc Cxpcc LVLI LV VV VV11J Ll UVLV LL. 111V lUl1LL YYlll V1LL1Vl VV %A11VVLIJ LLVLLIVULVLL V.Y LLV YVIV�J111V11L 111 LLlV
1:.... ,.Fr ,.,. ,__ ....,.L._..._.7 L_, aL ,_ ..a.. _: L 4V___
..11....a...7 �........ ,7,...,.1 ,. „.Y .. „+., aL _.... ,..L ,...a 4L ,.
UlVU 111 llVU VL 1VVJ Vl �J LLL VIIUJVLL V�' LLlV Vll.' YYlLll LVVJ VV1lVVLVLL 11V111 LLV YV1%JFIIIV11LJ LL11VUr,1IVUL LIaV
,.: C+L ,.._1.] aL- -- L.. ,7 ,._,._l �. „._.7 1..- -- Ti.. „ „,. ,7 ...., :1,.- +,_ 4L,_ T!1 A
VIV. IJ11VU1L1 LllV ULVUJ VV LLVYV1Vr/VLL UJ YVl�' lU1 &V 1 La lllclA %- %JILL111LLLI1LIVJ, 311111111 LV LLlV 1 VA
AT._4 :.. «..1 .7.__„_l._ «a 4L,. 1.. „.] ,7,. «,.a:._ «.. / „......L,. - - ,. 1:1.,.1.. 4... L._ «a.. -4r ) 1 ,_
11UL1VllUl LLV YV1VrJlllVlll, LLlV 1LL11LL LLV111UV11J /1J 111 V11UJVJ r..V 111\V1�' LV VV 111 IUIIVLLLILJ Vl JV UVl VJ Vl
greater. Larger -sized parks are more in keeping with the city's current desire to develop more
large -scale, full service community centers. The City is currently working on a parks and recreation
master plan which will identify future park sites and desired facilities.
The loss of the municipal complex park and recreational facilities contributes to the ongoing capital
need. Table 9 -4 identifies the ideal level of improvements that the City would like to offer to its
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -10
EAR -Based Amendments
residents. These are objectives which are used for facility planning and annual budgeting purposes
The City would like to be in a situation where it can adopt these objectives as formal level of service
standards in the comprehensive plan. Until the facilities that are eliminated due to the municipal
complex are replaced, the City is not prepared to formally adopt these objectives.
Public Safety
The Future Conditions section of the Public Safety Element Support Document identifies fire
stations, police facilities and equipment that will be required as capital projects to maintain the
adopted levels of service as Palm Beach Gardens develops (Tables 10 -4 and 10 -8). These level of
service standards will not be a formal requirement of the concurrency management program, but will
be evaluated during development review..
Approximately 70° 61 % of the City is currently vacant or undeveloped. The development of these
areas, with the inclusion of parcels through annexation, will necessitate additional public safety
services and facilities. The City shall undertake measures to ensure that adequate land and
equipment is available for police, fire and emergency assistance facilities to serve its current and
future residents. The Police and Fire Departments are funded primarily through ad valorem taxes.
The use of impact fees is the preferred method to ensure that new development offset the need for
public services created by such development.
A .. «:+..1 ,.a.....,. «t.. T,.L1- n A ..-A r.-- ,_« .1
!-1JJ L41111116 "%J 111UJV1 %1"F "L 111 v NJ LL11V11LJ, lUVIV -` 011V YVJ i/1VJ%1%"%%lL r/Vll", L"" "L%1 VF%-1l LLills LUI%A
L,Ui.Il LCLL L,Ai.JL,1ILLILLLL L,J LVl Ull, 1IVAL llv V -J'L,w FL,11VLL. 1 LdlJVlull,l GLL1LL Vi./I,l ULU1� \,VJLJ 11CLYLd VVVll 40L1111G4LVLL
._7 : ,_Fn0/ «.] CO/ ,.a:_,,.1_. !'�.. «:a._7 « ,.4,. ,. ._+1 . ,:+L .. CO/ ..1
VvlLLl Glll wlll LCLl lilllVGLJV Vl .1 /U ,..ILL ✓ /V, 1L.JFL,L1L1 YL,L y . %-"F/LGLL F1VJL.L,LJ CL1L, FlVJL,%, vv lulu .J /v "Lulu l
- A:..,. +..... ,. «a TL._ T.':.... T%--- «+.,.,. ,. «a On /nn �,_.._.. .1:,. «1.._... +L._ .. ..;+: ..« ..Cti_.,. ,.
CLLIJ LLJLi11L,11L. -L'", 1 lll, l--"1 JGUL1l1L,1lL 0l / ,IV 11r LLLL, 41Jjl1CLJ'J L11%, CLLsli L41J1L1V11 Vl LvvV L,11�',llll,J.
Additional capital expenditures will be necessary to maintain the adopted levels of service (Table
9A5). These have been projected based upon the adopted urban level of service standards of 1150
service calls /responding officer and a 5 minute response time to 90% of all calls. Response time is
measured as the time from receipt of a dispatched call until the first due unit arrives at the scene.
!',. «...-- ..L.. «,.:_... n1._ «1„ _-1-+.- - '._._a: ..« TL. ,. ,,,, :+..1 .,... -A- /T,_t_1 _ n C% ,_ -._ .. 1..,,1..4. --1 L_.
�V111�J1 L,11L,11J1Y1r 11CLL1J F%JF 41GLL1V11 iJ1VJL.L,LL 0113. 1111, L,GLiJ1LGLl 11L,L,LLJ `1CLVIL, J -✓% Ull, L,CLlV"lULC.Ll VJ'
...: «,- .- ,. +,..7 « ..1,.+:,.... l .. ,. ,.L _ .. L_. +L... T /lO +L,.« ......__1+. «1_.: «- aU-+ « -A I— +L-
111LL1L1FJL.yLlls L114 ill VJ try LVU �JVt/ULULIV111V1 cavil Yca LJ L11%, LVLJ, L11L,11111u1Ll1J1J'llls L11CLL 11Lr L,LL VJ' LAIN,
cstaautcu %1UF:LCL: %,ost. Police and fire capital costs have most recently been estimated for Palm
Beach Gardens in a "Fire/EMS, Police and Park Impact Fee Study" 11T-- LLL:11
1 L.L,11111\.•Gll 111L,111V1CLL1LLLLl11 Vll LL1L.
1Vl%`Ll %J4J LV %iLLL%,UICLLI, 1111yCLL,L 1 VL,J" prepared by James Duncan And Associates, May, 1997.
J CLL11L0 J
n AT:..L,.,,.,. nLn >, ,r.. -..L 1 nnn These costs are expected to be met by fees collected through
%. 1`I1L,11VI".3, 11111, Iv1CLLl,11, LJJV.
is ropo3c,d police and fire /ems impact fees. The new station needed to serve District 3 is expected to
be funded via a bond issue. Should the bond issue fail, the City will need to fund this capital project
with general revenues which will most likely necessitate a tax increase. A Distrct 5 station will also
be needed in the near future. At this time, a need for this station is not foreseen in the next five
years. Development proposals may impact level of service and necessitate the need for Station #5
sooner than the City's capital program budgets it. In this case, a developer will need to contribute
the needed fire station.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -11
EAR -Based Amendments
T:_._ T._a l ,... __.:11 L,. :_ .__
1 Vll♦rV GLL14 1 ilr ....F"UL ivVJ W111 VV All l x t /1LL1116LL1VV VvlilVll YY111 b'V VV1V1V LLlV �ll� t.V LLllV 11
F.....7._�a:...� L_. aL._ --A ..F i nni
1V1 GNAV�/I.1V11 U.' 111V V11LL Vl 1l/ I.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -12
EAR -Based Amendments
.�
1-.
1-,
,-,
1-,
,-,
„ a
0
U
� � a
as
U
�
U
U
U
Q
Q
W 0 'p
�
aa
Q
O o
--
w
w
CV
w
0
w
U
(� O
w
.�
1-.
1-,
,-,
1-,
,-,
..
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
w
w
cL:
w
w
w
w
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
o�
as
b
b
b
b
b
b
CA
Gn
H
y
N
Cy
N
r+
N
Cy
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
a
W
P
C7
x
z o
x
¢
o
a
o
GO)
a
A
a
C 0 0 0 wl
cq � .- N O M CA
44 � ,. N 69 6s 64 69 64 6 cy � C
as U
v
4)
CN
ON
OB o
4604 a C
rA
y 4;
C
°O �b
o0I ° O C
N C)
'd °O
U3
+� N i
U C
z, td
co
0
W
Q m of +� �O •^" U fy +� O y f
z U o E„ jS� 6' 4 U O Y
00
vi
Q
U
LC
N
Cd
w
O
U
ai
0
3
x
N a
a�
U V
V
O w
w
ai 0 0
0 V
V 0
0 V
V �
�
w w
w
O O
O O
O
O o
o O
O a
a
0 0
CD O
O O
O U
U
pOl 0
0°0 %
%0 N
N O
c' 6
6 6
6
O
N E
Es 6
69 o
oq �
� t
rn
a�
C o
°O
o o
o °
a
�•c p"a O
O c
c °
° °
° a
3
G� Ln FBI t
fA- -
-; G
N i
i N
N
t, f
5s C
G N
6s O
O •
•C N
0 0
°o °
0 0
0 O
O o
o O
O
c as O
O °
o o
o °
°o °
o
00
vi
Q
U
LC
N
Cd
w
O
U
ai
0
TABLE 9-4
Projected POIiC'e t Fire Operating and Capital Expenditures
FT 91/92
21,057,547.00
S417,384.00
163,000.00
i1,537,931:�
FT9VV3
21,152, .00
K , . 254.00
46$,150.00
51,657,130.00
FT
21,256,471.00
1460,166.00
169,458.00
21,786,095.00
i
i
FT 94/95
21,369,554.00
&483,175.00
S72,930.DC
11,925,659.00
POLICE OPERATING EXPENSES
\
FT $9190
F 90/91
Persorrtiel - Adj 9% ear
FIRE CPERAT EXPENSES
12,992,09 .00
23,261,384.00
53,554,909.00
23,874,851.00
i4,223,587.CC
Operating - Adj SX year
2255,094.00
Persomet - Adj 9% r `'
=890,116.00
5970
226.00
Operating - Adj 5% year
i37a,580.00
1397
509.00
Capital Projects
15,000,00
160,
00.00
Total Fire Operating
!1,383,696. `•21,427,
5.00
Totat Police Operating
FT 91/92
21,057,547.00
S417,384.00
163,000.00
i1,537,931:�
FT9VV3
21,152, .00
K , . 254.00
46$,150.00
51,657,130.00
FT
21,256,471.00
1460,166.00
169,458.00
21,786,095.00
i
i
FT 94/95
21,369,554.00
&483,175.00
S72,930.DC
11,925,659.00
POLICE OPERATING EXPENSES
Persorrtiel - Adj 9% ear
.00
12,992,09 .00
23,261,384.00
53,554,909.00
23,874,851.00
i4,223,587.CC
Operating - Adj SX year
2255,094.00
1267,84 0
81,241.00
$295,303.00
$310,068.00
$325,572.00
Capital Projects - Adj 5%
575,000.00
178, 00
.00
s86,822.00
191,163.00
S95,721.00
Totat Police Operating
63,075,136.00
13 8,694. 0
53,625,313:00
S3, 937, 034.00
54,276,082.00
1:,644,8,? Ll. CO
Source: City of Paim,Beach Gardens
Decenber, 1990
D:\COMrPLAN \POLFIRE. :KI
1 Q1/14 / -J
1 \444J LV l.iN111 L"Llli
1J4 ♦41 Vl V41 .144 VLRal4al L�'J
ATT?T, Tl c
,_,7.711 lF:...l
�•• •• • 1 yv1144 v11144r3* - -- - -- - -- - -- - --
uLLLL 1 1114 JLUL1V1lJ - -- - -- - -- - -- - --
eie TL._ ........].. :.1.__a:f'._.] l - a1__ T)..1:,_,. T-%- -- _- «a --- L._,_,_.] a1__ T !lc ..F 1 G _,rr _._ -.. /1 Ann
1114 1144UJ 1LL411L1114U LVl LL14 1 V1144 L/4yLL1L111411L CLL4 VCLJ4LL Vll LL14 LVLJ Vl 1.✓ VL11441J/ 11VVV
TlaL.. !'1 :4.-....:,_L._,_ a ... .......... aL_ :-]- -I ,.4r11 G .,CC,.,. -.,/1 nnr1.
yVyUluLLVll. 11 LL14 V1L�' YY1J114J LV yLUJU4 ul4 lU4GL1 Vl L.J VLL1441J/ 1,VVV y41JV11J, uLLLL1L1V11"41 y41JV111141
VV III V4 1144LL4U.
,.,. :a,_1 .�.....],. F ...C. -,_ .........a L._ ,_,.a:..«.,a,.,] ,..� .. ..:ti. _ �,7�. L..,.:,. T.0 .7,._...1.. «.Y.. «a
1114 4GLy1LLL1 1144LLJ LVl 1114 AlluaL U4 4JL1111CLL4LL Vll GL 41L�' -YYlU4 U"ala• it LL4Y41Vy111411 L, LLL1LL L114
La .. «a....4._.] _..:LLII %JILL%..« .. aLCALIULI0 _ %, L111...
14JLL1 Lllls yVyuluL1V11, 1J 4V114411LL U14LL YY 1L1LL11 CL 44116111/ yVl UV11 Vl L114 lit L�', LL JLLLLl Vll J 14J1JV11J4 L11114
aL._ T C'iO «.] a..: - 4r,_-:1:4_ -.]
111CL,' 4A444U LL14 LV LJ CLL1U LL 1s641 K 114 YY 1CL4111 L.Y 1144U.
A f, 1 nn')
LJVLLL44. %-1Ly VL 1 "Lill J.vrm 11 VG11U411J, lvI Xj, 1
TAnr T a L
1 L"1111J 1•. / -U
L'1LLL11L1VLl6Ll V61�11L41 I..VJl�
YT___ Ta _a_r_ a 7►T a
LRJL.4 VJ1V1114411 LL11441 \444.7
'91 '92 '93 '�� fAr
n u,
L vu41.' - -- - --
1 114 - -- - --
4-31 '71 A 01
4CLy1LCLL 4V0L y41 yV1144 V111441 - 4PL1, /.J'T.VJ
«:a._1 ..a « _ S".-- ..a,.a:.._ 01 n 1 L LLL L17
4CLy1LCL1 4VJL y41 1114 JLLLLLVll
/":a_. rn- 1_..,. n._.._L lnnn
LJV LL144J. VlLy VL 1 CLllll LJ44A4ll VCLlLL411J, L444111U41, 1JJV
71 d._aL. A_ a.. f" _l,__.1._a_ T____4. 1r _,_..11 L_. T._.Y_
L 44111114GLL 1Y14111V1"LL1LL LLLll Vll LL14 IYL4LL1\JU0 LV %lCLL4LL1CLL4 LLIIFCL4L 1 44J V�' JCLL114J
1 AAA
L \14 /1L/1"10, LYLCLL4111 1 /lV
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -16
EAR -Based Amendments
tn's
faA tn�
T11 -%nT TT A TT/l1LT
1 VL VLAL1Vl\
..1,_a: ......
1 A 011
'1 1 nn
X11 '1 ^?
1 A Cn
'1'10.1
yVyL11CLL1V11111414LLJ4
I_TVL
JIVV
L1JJ
1T✓/
JLV
1 A0'1
AGOO
7
010n
11 A411
4LL1I1LLICLLIV411141 \.CLJ4
1TVa.
T✓VV
V /L1
VLVV
ll'YVa.
ATT?T, Tl c
,_,7.711 lF:...l
�•• •• • 1 yv1144 v11144r3* - -- - -- - -- - -- - --
uLLLL 1 1114 JLUL1V1lJ - -- - -- - -- - -- - --
eie TL._ ........].. :.1.__a:f'._.] l - a1__ T)..1:,_,. T-%- -- _- «a --- L._,_,_.] a1__ T !lc ..F 1 G _,rr _._ -.. /1 Ann
1114 1144UJ 1LL411L1114U LVl LL14 1 V1144 L/4yLL1L111411L CLL4 VCLJ4LL Vll LL14 LVLJ Vl 1.✓ VL11441J/ 11VVV
TlaL.. !'1 :4.-....:,_L._,_ a ... .......... aL_ :-]- -I ,.4r11 G .,CC,.,. -.,/1 nnr1.
yVyUluLLVll. 11 LL14 V1L�' YY1J114J LV yLUJU4 ul4 lU4GL1 Vl L.J VLL1441J/ 1,VVV y41JV11J, uLLLL1L1V11"41 y41JV111141
VV III V4 1144LL4U.
,.,. :a,_1 .�.....],. F ...C. -,_ .........a L._ ,_,.a:..«.,a,.,] ,..� .. ..:ti. _ �,7�. L..,.:,. T.0 .7,._...1.. «.Y.. «a
1114 4GLy1LLL1 1144LLJ LVl 1114 AlluaL U4 4JL1111CLL4LL Vll GL 41L�' -YYlU4 U"ala• it LL4Y41Vy111411 L, LLL1LL L114
La .. «a....4._.] _..:LLII %JILL%..« .. aLCALIULI0 _ %, L111...
14JLL1 Lllls yVyuluL1V11, 1J 4V114411LL U14LL YY 1L1LL11 CL 44116111/ yVl UV11 Vl L114 lit L�', LL JLLLLl Vll J 14J1JV11J4 L11114
aL._ T C'iO «.] a..: - 4r,_-:1:4_ -.]
111CL,' 4A444U LL14 LV LJ CLL1U LL 1s641 K 114 YY 1CL4111 L.Y 1144U.
A f, 1 nn')
LJVLLL44. %-1Ly VL 1 "Lill J.vrm 11 VG11U411J, lvI Xj, 1
TAnr T a L
1 L"1111J 1•. / -U
L'1LLL11L1VLl6Ll V61�11L41 I..VJl�
YT___ Ta _a_r_ a 7►T a
LRJL.4 VJ1V1114411 LL11441 \444.7
'91 '92 '93 '�� fAr
n u,
L vu41.' - -- - --
1 114 - -- - --
4-31 '71 A 01
4CLy1LCLL 4V0L y41 yV1144 V111441 - 4PL1, /.J'T.VJ
«:a._1 ..a « _ S".-- ..a,.a:.._ 01 n 1 L LLL L17
4CLy1LCL1 4VJL y41 1114 JLLLLLVll
/":a_. rn- 1_..,. n._.._L lnnn
LJV LL144J. VlLy VL 1 CLllll LJ44A4ll VCLlLL411J, L444111U41, 1JJV
71 d._aL. A_ a.. f" _l,__.1._a_ T____4. 1r _,_..11 L_. T._.Y_
L 44111114GLL 1Y14111V1"LL1LL LLLll Vll LL14 IYL4LL1\JU0 LV %lCLL4LL1CLL4 LLIIFCL4L 1 44J V�' JCLL114J
1 AAA
L \14 /1L/1"10, LYLCLL4111 1 /lV
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -16
EAR -Based Amendments
Implementation Programs
The most obvious tool to implement the Capital Improvement Element is the capital improvements
program which the City will update on a regular basis. Additionally, in accordance with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the elements of this Comprehensive Plan, the city will maintain or
adopt new land development regulations and procedures to insure the levels of service standards
adopted by this plan are met or exceeded_ by :guy 1, 1 ^ ^0. These regulations and procedures will
require that all public facilities necessary to service new development at the adopted levels of
service standards are available prior to or concurrent with the impacts of the new development.
Furthermore, the regulations will be designed to simplify and streamline the existing regulatory
programs.
The regulations and procedures to be maintained or newly adopted include, but are not limited to:
• traffic (city road impact fees _yet to be adopted) and recreation impact fee ordinances;
o revised development application procedures which require an assessment of the ability
of existing facilities to accommodate proposed development;
• regulations which permit the phasing of development in concert with the provision of
necessary public facilities;
o the preparation of a capital improvements budget as part of the city's annual budget to insure
all facility deficiencies are identified and addressed;
• an annual monitoring and evaluation process to update the capital improvements element
and any deficiencies addressed therein;
o the prioritizing of capital expenditures to insure facility deficiencies take priority over
non - health and safety capital projects;
• an assessment of the city's fiscal capabilities to schedule and implement capital
improvement projects; and
o an annual review of the Comprehensive Plan for significant changes in growth projections
and/or facility requirements.
These regulations and procedures are identified in more detail in the goals, objectives, and policies
section of each element of this plan plus other sections of the text of this element. In all cases,
the city will not approve development which would cause the public facilities addressed by this
Comprehensive Plan to operate below their adopted levels of service standards.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -17
EAR -Based Amendments
IV. MONITORING AND EVALUATION
Chapter 163 of the Florida Statutes requires the Capital Improvement Element to be
continuously monitored and evaluated. Therefore, this element will be reviewed on an annual
basis to ensure that required fiscal resources will be available to provide the public facilities
needed to support the adopted level of service standards.
The annual review will be the responsibility of the City Manager, the City Finance Director, the
Local Planning Agency, with assistance by the Growth Management Department and a Ci y �:,1lllVii
'"`Ca '''`'��"'a " `'"'0�J' "�--`° ="- This group's findings and recommendations will be
ayyVlllwu �1�1L411JAb1Y1JV1�' liVllilllll�VV. gr p g
presented to the Mayor and City Council at a public meeting. The City Council will then direct
staff to take appropriate actions based upon the review committee's findings and recommendations.
The City, in conducting its annual review of the Capital Improvements Element, will consider
the following factors and will amend the element accordingly:
1. Any corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources;
acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the element; or the
date of construction of any facility enumerated in the Element;
2. The Capital Improvement Element's consistency with other elements of the
Comprehensive Plan and its support of the Future Land Use Map;
3. The priority assignment of existing public facility deficiencies;
4. The City's progress in meeting those needs determined to be existing deficiencies;
5. The criteria used to evaluate capital improvement projects in order to ensure that
projects are being ranked in their appropriate order of priority;
6. The City's effectiveness in maintaining the adopted LOS standards;
7. The City's effectiveness in reviewing the impacts of plans and programs of state agencies
and water management districts that provide public facilities within the city's jurisdiction;
8. The effectiveness of impact fees for assessing new development a pro rata share of the
improvement costs which they generate;
9. The impacts of special districts and any regional facility (DRI) and service provision upon
the City's ability to maintain its adopted LOS standards;
10. Efforts made to secure grants of private funds, whenever available, to finance the
provision of capital improvements;
11. The transfer of any unexpected account balance;
12. The criteria used to evaluate proposed plan amendments and requests for new
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -18
EAR -Based Amendments
development of redevelopment; and
13. Capital improvements needed for the latter part of the planning period, for inclusion in
the 5 -year Schedule of Improvements.
In an effort to make the annual Comprehensive Plan review efficient and effective, the
Council will require it to be completed prior to the beginning of the annual budgeting process.
All departments within the city will be directed to provide up -to -date information and to make staff
available to assist in the review. Formal recommendations for Comprehensive Plan amendments
will be made in conjunction with the submittal of the annual budget.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 2/98 9 -19
EAR -Based Amendments
PUBLIC SAFETY ELEMENT
Goals, Objectives and Policies
Goal 10.1: CONTINUE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE FACILITIES TO ENSURE THE
PROVISION OF AN EFFECTIVE PUBLIC SAFETY PROGRAM.
Objective 10.1.1: `TIT"I ull VIM ycai V� Q4VJR,1V11 V1 L111J l Agin G1G111G11L, i The City shall devtlap
continue to promote, alternative funding methods to ensure that new development pay its
proportionate share of the cost of providing public safety facilities, equipment and land
necessitated by the development.
Policy 10.1.1.1: The City prefers the use of police and fire impact fees as the method to more
equitably distribute the costs for public safety services.
Objective 10.1.2: Upon Plan adoption, the City shall provide public safety facilities in a timely
manner so as to comply with the level of service standards set forth by this element and to
maintain such compliance in subsequent years.
Policy 10.1.2.1: The City shall provide an initial emergency fire and rescue response to all of the
urban service area in an average time of 5.0 minutes or less. This standard shall be met in 90%
of all calls and shall be measured on a district basis. The rural service area shall have an average
8.0 minute response time.
T._1_-__ 1A 1 1 1_ TL.. /1_�__ _L_/1 �_• a__ __lC'___�a
1 Vllt.,' 1V•1.6.6. 111V %_ny J11Q11 1110.111L0.111 JLL1111r11r11L JJV1R.G �JV1JVJJUJ%,J LV Q1.1w v%;; Q 1QLLV Vl 1.J
1GJ V11LL111 Vl 11rG1J JJl3 1VVV 1JVf LL10.L1V11.
Y � Y Y 1J
Policy 10.1.2.23: The City shall maintain an acceptable service standard index not to exceed 500
J, 150 calls per officer per year to serve the urban area. Community Policing philosophy shall be
utilized in the urban area and rural crime control strategies shall be utilized in the rural area..
Policy 10.1.2.34: The Police and Fire Departments shall report the status of level of service
standards to the City Manager on a quarterly basis.
Policy 10.1.2.45: Per Rule 9J- 5.0055(1)(a), FAC, it is not necessary that the level of service
standards established in policies 10.1.2.1 - 10.1.2.34 be met prior to ulb i „LLalcc of a uc_ci�Yil-JLCrlt
orucr aau Ycl—juut for determination of concurrency. but the City shall maintain and ensure that new
development does not create impacts that exceed the established standards. (See Policy 9.1.4.2. (b))
PUBLIC SAFETY 7/97 10 -1
EAR -BASED AMENDMENT
PROCEDURES FOR ACCOMPLISHING MONITORING
AND EVALUATION REQUIREMENTS
Introduction
This report addresses the requirements and procedures that will be followed in the preparation
of the required five -year Evaluation and Appraisal Report (EAR) for the city of Palm Beach
Gardens. Section 9J -5.005 (7) Florida Administrative Code (FAC) has been referenced in
preparing this report. By PVIQy 1, 1994, u1G city InuaL Y:uuuc� an w u� �vaLuatcs u1G
/� _L_ -:___ T1_— _ a aL_ `_C Aof%
l..Vlll�)1 G11G11J1VG imu 5UUl11 LLGLL LV ulG Li%,Fai L111G11L Vl VV11ll11U1ll LY rxi.La11J Vll juiy /, 17(77.
The City submitted the EAR. which evaluated the 1990 Comprehensive Plan. to the Department
of Community Affairs (DCA) on August 20. 1996. The EAR was found sufficient by DCA in
December. 1996. This report with any revisions will be adopted as part of the revised -1989 1990
Comprehensive Plan, which will be transmitted to DCA in March. 1998. This report will be
consulted and followed in preparing the 4994 2001 EAR.
Citizen Participation
Citizen participation and input will play an important role in the preparation and adoption of the
EAR. After a draft of the EAR has been prepared it will be presented to the Local Planning
Agency (LPA) in at least one advertised public hearing. Any citizens with comments on the EAR
will be allowed to speak during this meeting. The LPA will then forward the EAR with a
recommendation for approval to the City Council. The City Council must adopt the EAR in an
advertised public hearing within 90 days following receipt of it from the LPA. Following
adoption the City Council will then forward the EAR to the Department of Community Affairs
(DCA) for their review.
Data Update
Baseline data used in the preparation of the plan will be reviewed. The EAR will recommend
which data should be changed, updated, added, or deleted. In addition, measurable objectives
which were to be followed during the preceding five years of the plan will be reviewed. Those
objectives which need to be revised will be identified.
Accomplishments
MONITORING & EVALUATION 2/98 11 -1
All of the plan's goals, objectives, and policies (GOPs) will be reviewed and the degree to which
they have been successfully accomplished will be noted. This information may be presented in
the form of a graph or matrix.
Negative Influences
Obstacles or problems which negatively affected the degree to which some GOPs were
implemented will be identified. These may be outside factors which the city cannot control, such
as national economic trends or severe weather conditions. The potential for re- occurrence of these
factors will be determined.
Revisions to GOPS
Following the identification of deficiencies in the GOPs or changed conditions which affected the
GOPs, new or revised GOPs will be recommended. These will not become part of the plan but
they will be considered and included as part of the plan update. The new or revised GOPs should
reflect the negative conditions, accomplishments, and updated data identified in the previous
sections.
Monitoring and Evaluation
The city's Comprehensive Plan is a dynamic document which needs to be continuously reviewed.
As conditions and influences change, so should the plan.
At least once a year, the plan will be reviewed in several ways. First, the baseline data will be
reviewed including economic assumptions and financial information. This. will include a thorough
review of the Capital Improvements Element and any infrastructure 'improvements which have
been made.
Next, a cursory review of the GOPs will be made to identify any major deficiencies. If major
deficiencies are found, the plan will be amended. Otherwise, any minor problems will be noted
for inclusion in the five -year EAR.
Finally, the Future Land Use Element, including the Future Land Use Map, will be reviewed for
consistency with the rest of the plan and any land development which may have occurred. This
effort will include a review for consistency with the city's
zoning ordinance and other land use regulations.
MONITORING & EVALUATION 2/98 11 -2
FUTURE LAND USE AND TRANSPORTATION
MAP SERIES
Mingo
�� �
�� I
�rt'r�•
- 'i ( fl 11 �
_
bra
1v' ,� ■ ■
1 Ili
+ \A1�1,
\
Willif
rtil�l�titi�
rrs
luui'r
,H��IL1�������J
r��
HOW-
Will
I I . I
I
'
I
�
is
0
��
b'
ii I
41:
v
CL
w
to
WIN
Or In
Kwzv
val
J
10 •
tin
ii I
41:
v
CL
w
to
Or In
Kwzv
77
lu-
Cd
Er-
/8j
±|
q
A
',J
E
Col.
gn
E
ea
El
TIVVIAM
\ II
II I
I V
- - - - - - - - - - -
c
S
o E
0 O:D CL
o'-w w
0 LO
a
M—CIL u CL
WQQ c c a
5:55
LL
11 1
II
a
.2
75
ca
cn.
x
LU
..........
it ...
co
TABLE 12A
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PROPOSED THOROUGHFARE ROADS
1. Burma Road extension to Northlake Boulevard Reliever.
2. Fairchild extension from Northcorp Parkway /RCA Boulevard to Campus Drive.
3. Alternate AIA bypass (west of Alt. AIA) from RCA Boulevard to north of PGA
Boulevard, connecting Military Trail turnout.
4. Gardens Boulevard from Alternate AlA to Prosperity Farms Road.
5. Flamingo Road from Prosperity Farms Road (Frenchman's Landing) to Hood
Road /Alternate AIA.
6. Hood Road extension to Prosperity Farms Road.
7. Donald Ross Road. extension from 69th Drive to Alexander Run/Jupiter Farms.
8. Alexander Run from Beeline Highway to future Donald Ross Road.
9. Coconut Boulevard extension from Northlake Boulevard to Beeline Highway.
10. Future 101st Street from Seminole Pratt Whitney Road to Coconut Boulevard.
11. Shady Lakes extension to 117th Court North.
12. 117th Court North from Florida's Turnpike to Shady Lakes.
13. Hood Road protected as six -lane ultimate section
(Turnpike east to Prosperity Farms Road).
14. Florida Boulevard from Lone Pine extension to Central Boulevard.
15. New facility midpoint of Donald Ross Road and Hood Road from Alternate AIA to west
of Central Boulevard and north to Donald Ross Road.
16. Elm Avenue. extension to Hood Road.
17. Right -of -Way for I95 /Central Boulevard Interchange.
18. BallenIsles Drive extension north to 117th Court North extension.
19. Banyan Street extension north to Florida Boulevard extension.
Gft
vv vv
:vv
171
tz
::r R
rA
CD
co
rp
zz 00 ►•
MCA
vv vv
:vv
MCA
I.
Ili
CENTR LHLI.
MCA
NA
G � �
`1
w
�!�� l�
CO
CS
c
o
--
CIS
s D
O
a
D
CIO
o o
w
N
�P
00 o
Q
� "�
pia,.
_ �I�
♦ ♦�!�♦
aQ 0
sa
gg 7
D a b
ndmrmy��rJO
u.,
i
3 3
o C w
m o
N N
III
J F
N N C N
y N
NA
G � �
`1
w
�!�� l�
-
'
b� '� �`�
� "�
pia,.
_ �I�
♦ ♦�!�♦
NA
G � �
`1
w
�!�� l�
a 0O, ppG
O
a� ryry
�a
�T
e
I �
e
n
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
• I
I
I
I I
I•
�LySF
0
I
I
I
I
a
o�
a 0O, ppG
O
a� ryry
�a
�T
e
I �
e
n
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
• I
I
I
I I
I•
I
I
I
I
M
malls"i.111
Immim
FIX"
ff I P�i
wrl
Nfffiffr—m ToRM—M—M
01077 p - Zllm�
7,
mill
J5I'l
MIND
11 o Alwo
•
� AAM Ll
�L
olimmak'now4m,®
............. as
IL
..............
%h
I-
•
r
1'
♦
/r
n
—
/
/
n
V
.{
/
n
0
r
ih
r
•,
r'- =�
.
Il,
.�.rrrlwVV.
Pli
CD
as
d A p'
tz
w � �
ti
1
S'
m'
A
Q:
o^
td
�i
°o
�gg
�K
N
O
Z
. 1.4 g
I
I
I
I
I
I
9� II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f
I
EWER
Ll I
-1. kona,
-grow
CD
90
>
CD
0
A
- - -
- - -
- - - - -
EWER
Ll I
-1. kona,
-grow
..........................
_. .................
o
0
Q
Q<
N co
•--� v�
r + U
x_
cqs
cz
Cd
0
Q
a�
�o
INS
o
o~
�A
o.°
IFS
o.°
Cd
,.
OQ
N
0.- k
to
0
U i —U
N
cd G�
U
1�v�
c�
N
N
i >U
>U
i U
CS
C,
'O
tO'
"C
U
c,
cd
ocn
cd
o
E -
two
F. R!
w
o r,
tU. Q [�
i V m
U
.fl
o
����
VSO
U-9 H
aF-���
aro
o
0
Q
Q<
N co
•--� v�
r + U
x_
Cd
Q
,O—
INS
o
�A
IFS
Cd
,.
OQ
N
0.- k
to
0
U i —U
N
cd G�
U
cn
aro
o
0
Q<
N co
•--� v�
r + U
x_
N
a
cis
°
°
>a
Cd
Go
rn
N
O
o�
�z
OW
0.2:
aA
'z
� W
a�
cw
J Cl)
d �
7
w
7
LL W
V
H
U
W
A
d
a
z
A
W
H
0
0
.,
O
;
o
won
i
° Cd
°
>� >aic�
X.
a
C13 a�
0 to
�U U�M
.
� 4t 4-
��
>C
N
U
0 O y
U
U�D
X
rA CA
�U
w E—�
V y
y y pp Qj
P.
4 b
..
_.
N
En
.,
o y
O
�.
b
00
LO
:O
�A
��
�•f,,,
--\
i U U
r
A-�
O.�
i
Obi
i"Cl
� a
au
:! •�"i
O" U
OHO
00
l+t.. .. u, is
N
V
O
.
�z
ow
�°
CL
°• Q
cn w
Cd
ova
C�
U
u
A
_
=w
rx
w
LL w
0 0
ry �
a�
a�
t
-o •°
.n
°
� o
�
crs
0
0
O
cq o
�N
Qo
aQa�
H
O a�i
.� O
�t4-4
o a
° ° >
> ..
'Cd
Q
a >,
U
-+
O
Cd
=$ ...
° 0
O
U
cis
-v
s. o
O U
O
O - O
U En
aNi °?
cd cn
000
a�
to w o
r» �n
-- ycVar,�N
rn
0 0
ry �
a�
a�
t
-o •°
a�
°
o
crs
0
0
O
cq o
�N
to A
o ;3
O a�i
.� O
..
U
tt y V
0 U
o
CA ° o
O
O O" b4 ,_,•,
aNi °'
U o
�.¢
U �
ooh
N
� •�
U U
•� c� p..
to w o
r» �n
0 0
ry �
a�
a�
b
°
a
0
a�
C
C txo
N
U
o
o
bA
C4-4
`�
.,
0 0
O
O
U
40
o
a °03
° > ..
a�
�o
O
r �O U
UMI
a
m O 3 cs
- U y o
cn tn
-a;
O
O 71
'C
a�
U
Ei
0)
U?
T-
N
U
O
D �
�z
OW
CL
CL A
'z
N W
m
N
'C A
C W
mCl)
J �
L' rQ
LL W
t
-o •°
0 TJ
o
crs
0
0
C,
rn
N
.-
.� O
O O
I
,Cd
c U
•
b
b
°
a
0
a�
C
C txo
N
U
o
o
bA
C4-4
`�
.,
0 0
O
O
U
40
o
a °03
° > ..
a�
�o
O
r �O U
UMI
a
m O 3 cs
- U y o
cn tn
-a;
O
O 71
'C
a�
U
Ei
0)
U?
T-
N
U
O
D �
�z
OW
CL
CL A
'z
N W
m
N
'C A
C W
mCl)
J �
L' rQ
LL W
t
0 TJ
crs
0
0
C,
rn
b
°
a
0
a�
C
C txo
N
U
o
o
bA
C4-4
`�
.,
0 0
O
O
U
40
o
a °03
° > ..
a�
�o
O
r �O U
UMI
a
m O 3 cs
- U y o
cn tn
-a;
O
O 71
'C
a�
U
Ei
0)
U?
T-
N
U
O
D �
�z
OW
CL
CL A
'z
N W
m
N
'C A
C W
mCl)
J �
L' rQ
LL W
t
0 TJ
oG0
b
°
a
0
a�
C
C txo
N
U
o
o
bA
C4-4
`�
.,
0 0
O
O
U
40
o
a °03
° > ..
a�
�o
O
r �O U
UMI
a
m O 3 cs
- U y o
cn tn
-a;
O
O 71
'C
a�
U
Ei
0)
U?
T-
N
U
O
D �
�z
OW
CL
CL A
'z
N W
m
N
'C A
C W
mCl)
J �
L' rQ
LL W
E
"O
N .N •�
M
>,
o,
"O
N .N •�
M
>,
r
O
cm
IL
Co
CD
N
V
O
D �
�z
OW
c. 2:
CL
'z
N W
d�N
'a Q
C W
J co
d W
7
LL W
�Umm•►
� A 4 M
�
43 v
A
p
ON A A
�W014J
.�b0m41
o
,..�
�-
o b 0 •�,
M41
U o .
um
���ora
DU
V ��4 N
0
F
43
.0 41 0 0
+'°'
a
m
vi
Q.
`�
�1
to ° b
c N
0 a°
0
L
b a �, V w
4J
43
a
cJ
s
�
a
4.
ao m
4) -A A
q-
4) AEiJA
+►
p
00
7r A
.H
j-
44 S E
w
o to 0
'
of
41
A
m9ty+Naa
.
4))
b
4J
A
0
bm q
OH
r
P4
Rf
z
b
•r1
u
:j
cn
d
4) U C) m m -A
zo xb 0 0
F4
O
V
M 0
a�
a
aP'a �
H�
OX
IN 00
00 04
O
Si *'
00
u 0
a
Q
�
U
O)
A
O
0
E7
Z
L
d
0
ROM
Z
d
c�
a
1°
u�
V)
2
0
U
0)00 *—
V�'40
A0
.9 � 0
�
tp +�
b r4 0
�NV�+1
•,fib vb
gU m
U ;"
0•i um
4 Q 0
u
tp 0
b0 m
°d
.p m 0
��b0 14 Of
"4
.0
�0
MV0Wm
N0WN
V 0
U O A
as
O) A
r,
41 0
44 ��H
Oto:.0
0r.tr$0i w
14 0 90 01
gOIV "1mq
z =xb00
o
�
S
J
a
�
N
N
z
4
u
Q
�
U
O)
A
O
0
E7
Z
L
d
0
ROM
Z
d
c�
a
1°
u�
V)
2
0
U
0)00 *—
V�'40
A0
.9 � 0
�
tp +�
b r4 0
�NV�+1
•,fib vb
gU m
U ;"
0•i um
4 Q 0
u
tp 0
b0 m
°d
.p m 0
��b0 14 Of
"4
.0
�0
MV0Wm
N0WN
V 0
U O A
as
O) A
r,
41 0
44 ��H
Oto:.0
0r.tr$0i w
14 0 90 01
gOIV "1mq
z =xb00
41Umm•�
4J H A�
� m
.�a O
'b •0-I -A m O
V �A
O
'rq b old
���m•.0
U P, •�
a >1
ari u
�0" X41 Ox
04 v \ N 454A a
0 14
°m° N o b m
a°a"
la bona °a
�rd bVm
Ox
P 014 W r4 44
41 Fi- a�
41
le
Um�•.1
a
a m
ofol
4J E4
a mm
O �ZZ, 44A SAE
O
4j E4 0
41 N U $4401,�mQm
N 41 .. 4! 41 P' •� • of 41
b 41 p >r •n A 0I >� ••� A ;3
N z 4 U w Z= x47 00
H 0
au
�u
p0p�� 0
iw M
b
�o
a
0
4j
O0
0
u 9
a
0 0 0 0-
.0 .,i A Am
4J r-I 4J
� 0
0
r.. 8
b� A 41
�•
.'i00
14J
Ogm
0
gu
0 (0�0.�
b� o�
Abu
. a�i � .�
u
X41
V410''m
W 44
14 w
�y
0
0 14 A
tj
ON 0,0
IV V 0 W
k 43 14 14
a
b a,r�+w
u
s . °° 4J
A004u
O
tea) "44"4
41P 4J 4J
0
V
4W A �E
�.
N
0--
O to ce 00
4-)
v,r.a+Ntra
rI
0
b
•�
f30ro�mq
P4
z
10
4
•�
u
:1
w
4!00041•.1
43= 4300 0 0
4) U 0 0-
4;iAAll
I c CJ+ 4a
_ m
l7 R O O m
o �
ct Itr4 41 41
•r4 •V m 0
•mob � ub
a��m�
Y
a 0 �' rj 4) m .0 ''i
Uto A4j N
41 Cif 4) O .!
i� 4 -) 0
A
E� (N11ONO�
0
it 4J 0 A
41 � �' c® � a4j Mw
a a am
VH �+ �
0
•� {a 44
z
O
V m m ta
N tNA U kGOIAmgm
P4 z 4 u w �� z= xb M 0
H
u
v�
N O
a�
41
"q
E� 0
�m
C m
"
a
Wb
t0
O
0
O
um
m
a
ao�
H ! 0
P4
0
as '�
a
�m
m
0
U m
oa
v
,a
1
c
4
9J
H
O
W
U
v 41
a
z v
cn
NUmdl••
V.�iA0
tP 44
� m
0
!T 0 0
.H -A m 0
$4U00
U� O q O
l p rr
O 040.4
U go "4 U
r-o
>1 v
4J
to 41 m
�°a
•
a
iob,°01
w
0 '� p' 0
tvV 0 A
P 0 14 14
b 0040Hw
At 4A
v
U -ri
cj
0 43
aaa�mm
WA 041E
O NC
3 N 0 kON
r-I Po A $4 V4 43 a
Q0toH0
WU4!m0 -H
Z - xbaa