Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Council Agenda 030598All those wishing to address the City Council need to complete the necessary form (supply located in back of Council Chambers) and submit same to the City Clerk prior to the meeting being called to order. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS MARCH 5, 1998 7:30 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE U. ROLL CALL: Mayor Russo, Vice Mayor Furtado, Councilwoman Monroe, Councilman Jablin, Councilman Clark [II. ANNOUNCEMENTS Tuesday, March 10, 1998, Planning and Zoning Commission Wednesday, March 11, 1998, Education Advisory Board IV. CITY MANAGER REPORT V. PRESENTATIONS 1. City Signs - Mark Fuller VI. AWARDING OF BIDS 1. Awarding of RFP for Grant Writing Services. VII. ITEMS BY MAYOR AND COUNCIL VIII. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC (Please submit request card to Clerk prior to this Item) IX. CONSENT AGENDA 1. Approval of 2/19/98 Local Planning Agency Minutes. 2. Approval of 2/19/98 City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. 3. Approval of 2/26/98 Joint Meeting with Planning and Zoning Commission 4. Proclaiming March 5, 1998 as "Sam Carsillo" Day. 5. Resolution 24, 1998 - Consideration of Approval to Authorize the City Manager, Mayor and Legal Counsel to Negotiate the Purchase of Park Land form the MacArthur Foundation. X. PUBLIC HEARINGS: XI. RESOLUTIONS: Resolution 2, 1998 - Consideration of Approval of a Site Plan for NorthMil Plaza. Resolution 20, 1998 - Consideration of Approval Amending the Site Plan for Parcel 19A, Orchid Cay, Located within the BallenIsles PCD, as Originally Approved by Resolution 106, 1997, For Entry Feature, Sign and Landscaping. Resolution 22, 1998 - Consideration of Approval of a Site Plan for a 40,000 Square Foot Office Building Located on Lot 3 within NorthCorp Planned Community District. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 3/5/98 XI. RESOLUTIONS: (Continued) Resolution 23, 1998 - Consideration of Approval to Appoint a Member to the Education Advisory Committee. XII. ORDINANCES: Ordinance 5, 1998 - Providing for Amendment of Section 78 -2 of the Code of Ordinances, Entitled "Definitions ", by Amending the Definition of "Restaurant" and by Adding a Definition of "Outdoor Seating "; Providing for Enactment of Section 110-44 of the Code of Ordinances, Entitled "Menu Boards "; Providing for Amendment of Section 118-44 of the Code of Ordinances, Entitled "Administrative Amendments to Approved Development Plans "; by Adding a Provision for Enactment of Section 118 -311 of the Code of Ordinances, Entitled "Outdoor Seating" (Consideration ofFirst Reading). XIII. ITEMS FOR COUNCIL ACTION XIV. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION XV. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT XV1. ADJOURNMENT In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Florida Statute 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodations to participate in this proceeding should contact James Waldron, Jr., no later than 5 days prior to the proceeding at telephone number (561) 775 -8255 for assistance; if hearing impaired, telephone the Florida Relay Service Numbers (800) 955 -8771 (TDD) or (800) 955 -8700 (VOICE), for assistance. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Council, with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, they will need a record of the proceedings, and for such purpose, they may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. '2 PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, Sam Carsillo has been a resident of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, since 1969; WHEREAS, on March 5, 1998, Sam Carsillo, will be married to his wife for 59 years; WHEREAS, on March 28, 1998, Sam Carsillo will be 81 years young; WHEREAS, Sam Carsillo has raised six (6) children while living in the City of Palm Beach Gardens and enjoys 8 grandchildren and 2 great grandchildren; and WHEREAS, Sam Carsillo along with 6 other fathers coached softball for 14 teams before there was a Palm Beach Gardens Youth Athletic Association, and provided the children with free lessons, equipment and uniforms and which teams ranked 3rd in the nation for a City with a population of 1,000; WHEREAS, the success of Sam Carsillo's softball efforts resulted in the City of Palm Beach Gardens inviting him to join with the City in offering softball programs; WHEREAS, Sam Carsillo crusaded to bring the City of Palm Beach Gardens its first post office; and WHEREAS , because of the efforts of Sam Carsillo, as a result of an injury to his granddaughter, the. Palm Beach Gardens Medical Center became an emergency center, and years later, because of his persistence, constructed a helipad for emergency landings; WHEREAS, Sam Carsillo fought to bring to the City of Palm Beach Gardens it's first regional library; WHEREAS, Sam Carsillo has gone to Washington DC to fight for safety laws for employees, especially those that were members of a union; WHEREAS, Sam Carsillo served for over 13 years as a member to the City's Code Enforcement Board and Zoning Board of Appeals; and WHEREAS, Sam Carsillo consistently brings potential problems and recommended solutions to the attention of the City Council and City Manager; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Joseph R. Russo, Mayor of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, proclaim Thursday, March 5, 1998, as SAM CARSILLO DAY in the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and urge all citizens to join in expressing appreciation for the dedication and persistence Sam Carsillo has shown in securing a quality of life we have all come to enjoy. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,,I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, to be affixed on this 5th day of March in the Year of Our Lord, Nineteen Hundred and Ninety Eight. Mayor Joseph R. Russo ATTEST: Linda V. Kosier, CMC, City Clerk CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Date:-Feb. 26,1998_ Subject/Agenda Item Grant Writing Service Recommendation/Motion: Approve GGW&C as Grant Consultant Reviewed by: City Attorney Finance ACM Human Res. Other W entby: Director Approved by: City Manager BACKGROUND: Originating Dept.: Police Advertised: Date: Feb.7, 8, Paper: [ ] Not Required Affected parties [ ] Notified [ ] Not required Costs: $ 80,000 Total $ 80.000 Current FY Funding Source: [ ] Operating [ x ] Other Personal .Ser. Budget Acct. #:: Council Action: [ J Approved [ ] Approved W, conditns [ ] Denied [ ] Continued to: Attachments: [ ] None In January 1998 we became aware of a Police technology grant with a projected grant release date of February 28, 1998. The potential proceeds from this Federal grant for police technology is.between $750,000 and $1,000,000 for our City. The Police Depa «rent called Palm Beach County and the City of West Palm Beach about their grant plans for the upcoming Police Technology grant. Both agencies advised that they were hiring a grant writer to perform this service for this grant and other grants that may be available. The City of West Palm Beach advised that their grant writer would also be pursuing other grant potential for other city functions under their contract. Our City, as many other municipalities, does not have a trained grant writer on staff nor do we have the support staff at this time to assign the task of writing grants. On February 7,8, 1998 we advertised and did four mailings of our Request For Proposal (RFP) seeking proposals from grant writers. The closing date for proposals was on February 20, 1998. At that time three proposals had been received. The three responding vendors were GGW &C Inc., Craig A. Smith & Associates, and John L. Adams & Co. Inc. Evaluation The three proposals were reviewed on the following criteria: cost of service, experience, technical proposal, and references. Cost: Of the respondents, GGW &C provided the lowest documented cost of $80,000 for a two (2) year contract with a guarantee of one million dollars ($1,000,000) within the contract period. All fees charged to the City would be refunded if these criteria were not met. As part of the contract, GGW &C ensures a performance bond of the entire retainer fee for services described in their proposal. Other proposers offered no guarantees for performance. Experience: Although all companies appeared to have experience in writing grants GGW &C documented more successes in writing grants in the last ten (10) years. They were the only respondents that provided excellent documented results in the area of law enforcement. Technical Proposal: Proposals documented varying levels of organizational efficiency to work through grant acquisitions. GGW &C documented an efficient process and time line to work through the grant processes both prior to and after grant identification. Their proposal clearly indicated staffing levels for grant administration and support. Time lines for grant development was clear and concise. References: All respondents listed references, however, only GGW &C showed substantial law enforcement involvement. Summary After reviewing all proposals and completing the evaluation form, it was noted that GGW &C exceeded other respondents in all areas, especially in the area of financial benefit vs. risk. Funds are presently available in police personal services account. These funds are available as a result of shortages in police officer staffing. Although we are presently attempting to hire new officers past attempts have been only partly successful because of the lack of qualified applicants. There is approximately $135,000 unused accumulated funds from October through February in the Police Department personal services account. Recommendation Although this is a non budgeted item in the 1997/1998 budget there is financial justification to support this item with little to no risk to the City. It is staff's recommendation that Council award this contract to GGW &C for grant writing services 2 CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY FEBRUARY 19, 1998 The February 19, 1998, meeting of the Local Planning Agency was called to order was called to order at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex located at 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida; and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: The roll was called by the Deputy City Clerk and the following elected officials were found to be in attendance: Mayor Joseph R. Russo, Councilwoman Linda Monroe, Councilman Eric Jablin and Councilman David Clark. Vice Mayor Lauren W. Furtado was absent from the meeting. EAR -BASED AMENDMENTS: Kim Glas, Principal Planner, stated that this was a public hearing for consideration of a recommendation to the City Council for transmittal of the EAR -Based Amendments. Ms Glas stated that the amendments were based on the Evaluation Appraisal Report as well as the City's vision. Ms. Glas presented the Council with the adopted portion of the Comprehensive Plan which consisted of the goals, objectives and policies as well as the future land use map and future transportation map. Ms. Glas also presented the Council with a copy of documentation which consisted of supporting data and analysis required by 9J5. Ms. Glas stated that the staff reported included summarized changes as requested by the Council and changes recommended by staff. Ms. Glas also presented the Council with an ERATA Sheet. Ms. Glas stated that the Comprehensive Plan was being updated from a 2010 plan to a 2015 plan and that most of the changes were in the goals and objectives policies. She stated that there were a few land use changes which reflect the County's acquisition and eco -sites and the City's acquisitions of park and public areas. Ms. Glas stated that the only private type property being changed was the Nativity Lutheran Church on Holly Drive, from Commercial to Residential Medium. Ms. Glas stated that the Police Department had hired new computer specialists and have a better idea of the number of service calls they have historically as well as the ability to project future service calls. Therefore, will review their numbers and would possibly come LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY 2119/9$ Page 2 back before Council adopts the amendments to recommend changes to the Police Department's level of service. Ms. Glas stated that after the amendments are transmitted to DCA, they have 90 days to review them. She stated that the amendments would not be brought back before the City Council for consideration of adoption until June. Mayor Russo declared the public hearing open, which was duly advertised on February 12, 1998. Ms. Glas stated that the City used the IPARC process and that the Town of Jupiter was the only entity who reviewed the amendments. Ms. Glas stated that the MacArthur Foundation had an interest in how the amendment would affect their property. Ms. Glas stated that the amendments were reviewed by the Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Committee which was a subcommittee of the Planning and Zoning Commission. In response to a question by Councilwoman Monroe, Ms. Glas stated that she had no problem with leaving the minimum number of acres to 250. Ms. Glas stated that others could request a wavier if there was a legit parcel today under the 250 acres. Rick Warner, MacArthur Foundation representative, stated that the Foundation had worked with staff to discuss their concerns. He stated that the City staff felt that the remaining issues by the Foundation were Council policies and/or DCA policies. Mr. Warner presented the Council with a letter from the Foundation outlining their areas of concerns and asked that it be entered into the record. Mayor Russo suggested that staff schedule a workshop with the Foundation to discuss their concerns. City Manager Herakovich stated that a workshop could be scheduled the 2nd or 4th Thursday in March. There being no further comments from the public, Mayor Russo declared the public hearing closed. Councilman Clark made a motion to recommend the EAR -Based Amendments of the Comprehensive Plan to the City Council for approval with the amendment on Pages 1 -20 and 1021, changing 90 acres to 250 acres in Policy 1.1.5.1.A.1. and Policy 1.1.5.1.A.2 and LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY 2/19/98 Page 3 also in both provisions changing the last sentence that refer to a waiver from the minimum size threshold to read as follows: "a waiver from the minimum size threshold maybe granted by the City Council for existing parcels of lesser size as of February 19, 1998, and changes on the ERATA Sheet. Councilman Jablin seconded the motion which carried unanimously with a vote of 4 -0. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 7:55 p.m. APPROVAL: MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO VICE MAYOR LAUREN W. FURTADO COUNCILWOMAN LINDA MONROE COUNCILMAN ERIC JABLIN COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK ATTEST: CINDY HARVEY, DEPUTY CITY CLERK CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 19, 1998 The February 19, 1998, Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, was called to order at 7:56 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex located at 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida; and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: The following elected officials were found to be in attendance: Mayor Joseph R. Russo, Councilwoman Linda Monroe, Councilman Eric Jablin and Councilman David Clark. Vice Mayor Lauren W. Furtado was absent from the meeting. I RESOLUTION 2, 1998 In response to a question by Mayor Russo, David Acton, City Attorney, stated that i was Council's decision exclusively whether or not hear Resolution 2, 1998 tonight. He stated that the position of the petitioner would be a good thing for the Council to obtain before it =A-e-&-a decision about whether to postpone Resolution 2, 1998. PAL Larry Smith, representing the petitioner requested that the Council postpone Resolution 2, 1998 until Council � a a�rl'�ble. It was the consensus of the Council oof hear testimony from the residents tonight due to the absence o Vice Mayor Furtado and that Resolution 2, 1998 be postponed until March 5, 1998, when a full Council would be available. Mayor Russo stated that Vice Mayor Furtado was absent tonight because of a death in her family. Councilwoman Monroe made a motion to postpone Resolution 2, 1998 to the meeting of March 5, 1998. Councilman Clark seconded the motion which carried unanimously. PRESENTATIONS: Award of Excellence to the Fire Department Pete Bergel, Acting Fire Chief, introduced Vicki Wade, Public Education Specialist, and Richard Slawson, founder of the Slawson Foundation for Children. Ms. Wade stated that her job was to train the public in fire safety and injury prevention. She stated that the award was won in a partnership with Richard Slawson of the Richard CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 2/19/98 Page 2 Slawson Foundation for Children. Ms. Wade stated that Mr. Slawson had joined and supported the Fire Department in the Drowning Prevention Program and County -wide Poster Contest. Richard Slawson stated that it was a privilege and an honor to work with the community and the Fire Department, in particular Vicki Wade, who comes up with tremendous ideas which his firm believes help save lives, prevent drowning, prevent fires and educate our children so they can also help in the prevention of injuries. Craig Hauhn, Florida Fire Chiefs Association, presented an awards to the Palm Beach Gardens Fire Department and the Slawson Foundation for Children and a check in the amount of $500 to the Fire Department for their outstanding efforts. Mr. Haughn introduced Larry Skobida, Executive Director, and Bob Ware, South East Regional Director. City Manager Herakovich and Mayor Russo presented Linda Kosier, City Clerk, with a 15 year service award pin. Ms. Herakovich stated that Ms. Kosier has worked for the City since 1983. City Manager Herakovich and Mayor Russo presented Janice Rausch with a plaque who served as a member of the Code Enforcement Board from November 1991 until November 1997. City Manager Herakovich and Mayor Russo presented William Mignogna a plaque who served as a member of the Planning and Zoning Commission from September 1993 until November 1997. CITY MANAGER REPORT: City Manager Herakovich stated that a tour of Frenchmens Forest had been scheduled for Saturday, February 21, 1998 at 10 a.m. She stated that the Annual Fire Department Open House was scheduled for Saturday, February 21, 1998 from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m., as well as the opening day of Little League baseball. Ms. Herakovich stated a workshop was scheduled for February 26, 1998. She requested an Executive Session to discuss I.A.F.F. bargaining unit contract with the Council on February 26. The Executive Session was scheduled for Thursday, February 26, 1998 at 7 p.m. Ms. Herakovich stated that a reception to recognize City volunteers, CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 2/19/98 Page 3 advisory board committee members, and outgoing Councilwoman Monroe had been scheduled for March 11, 1998 from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Ms. Herakovich stated that a public hearing had been scheduled by FDOT for the PGA Boulevard and Alternate AlA reconfiguration which would be held on February 26 and March 12. Ms. Herakovich stated that staff would be attending the meetings. Ms. Herakovich stated that she attended the PGA CAN meeting and that there was a request to place the consideration of no objection to the issue of PGA gates on an upcoming agenda. Ms. Herakovich stated that Paul Friedman, Management Administrator, attended the Boca Raton meeting on the FEC train whistle. Mr. Friedman presented a brief report of the meeting to the Council. Mr. Friedman presented an update on the Municipal Complex project. He stated that staff had received the 95% drawings which were being reviewed by Jack Hanson, Building Official, and Bill Mignogna's firm. Mr. Friedman stated that they would be meeting with the Art Advisory Board soon to discuss art in public places. He stated that the City Engineer and ADG's Civil Engineer had met to discuss site plan issues. Mr. Friedman stated that the Technical Services Committee was evaluating hardware choices. Mr. Friedman stated that positive meetings had been held with the Fire Department to discuss relocating the fire staff to the church property until the completion of the remodeling of the fire station. He stated that the Fire Department staff would be moved into the church property by May 15, 1998 so that construction could start concurrently. Ms. Herakovich stated that ADG would be at the February 26, 1998 workshop to present an update of the project. Mr. Friedman stated that the construction documents were being reviewed by the City Attorney as well as being reviewed by another firm. He stated that the City Forester had been working with the landscape architecture. Mr. Friedman stated the construction manager would be reviewing invoices from the architects and all vendors before they are submitted for payment. Staff, MCAT and ADG will hold a 95% completion meeting on March 3, 1998. Mr. Friedman stated that a general contractor from Bill Mignogna's firm, who had a CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 2/19/98 AWARDING OF BIDS: Page 4 tremendous amount of construction experience and had worked on numerous number of public projects, had been added to the MCAT Team. Mr. Friedman stated that the City had to contract out for an outside asbestos abatement investigation and as a result of the investigation learned that asbestos was present in all buildings at minimal levels. Mayor Russo requested that Council be presented with an absetos report at the next meeting. Mr. Friedman stated that there were two formats of absetos; air borne which was of danger and nonfriable which is found in ceilings, tiles, linoleum, dry wall compound which is where it has been located. He stated that along as the nonfriable absetos was not disturbed, there was no problem. EAP Request for Proposal Councilwoman Monroe made a motion to approve the awarding of the RFP for Employee Assistance Program to The Children and Family Services of Palm Beach County, in the amount of $8,112. The motion was seconded by Councilman Clark and unanimously carried. Dump Truck Councilwoman Monroe made a motion to approve staff's recommendation to piggy -back off Palm Beach County Fleet Management contract and award the bid for a one ton dump truck to Ed Morse Chevrolet in the amount of $29,586. The motion was seconded by Councilman Clark and unanimously carried. ITEMS BY MAYOR & COUNCIL: Councilwoman Monroe Councilwoman Monroe stated that there was a beautiful palm beaches grant opportunity available and presented staff with the information. In response to a question by Councilwoman Monroe, Ms. Herakovich stated that the mockup version of the City sign would be presented at the February 26, 1998 Council workshop. Councilman Jablin Councilman Jablin stated that he attended the CAN Annual meeting and that City Manager Herakovich and staff did a great job of presenting where the City was with the municipal complex project. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 2/19/98 Page 5 Mayor Russo Mayor Russo stated that he attended a Tennis Committee meeting and that the Committee supported the City 100% to build the courts on the site near Duncan Middle School. Mayor Russo stated that the attended a Municipal League Meeting and briefed the Council on the discussion that took place. Mayor Russo stated that the City would host the General Membership Meeting on April 22, 1998 at the Burns Road Community Center. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC CONSENT AGENDA: Councilwoman Monroe requested that Item #4 and Councilman Jablin requested that Item #6 on the Consent Agenda be pulled for amendments. Councilman Clark made a motion approve the Consent Agenda with Items #4 and #6 removed. Councilman Jablin seconded the motion which unanimously carried. The following items were approved on the Consent Agenda: 1. Approval of 1/29/98 City Council Workshop Minutes. 2. Approval of 1/29/98 Joint Meeting with City of Riviera Beach Minutes. 3. Approval of 2/5/98 Local Planning Agency Minutes. 5. Resolution 12, 1998 - Consideration of Approval for an Expression of Opposition to Florida House Bill 3291. 7. Resolution 18, 1998 - Consideration of Approval Providing for Support of Permanent and Consistent Funding for Regional Planning Councils. Councilman Clark made a motion to approved the Minutes of 2/5/98 with an amendment on Page 4, three paragraphs from the bottom as follows: delete the word "much" and replace with the word "sufficient ". The motion was seconded by Councilwoman Monroe which unanimously carried. Resolution 15, 1998 It was the consensus of the City Council that the Education Advisory Board draft a resolution to support vocational magnet schools to present to Council for their approval which would be forwarded to the Palm Beach County School Board. Councilman Jablin made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Monroe to approve Resolution 15, 1998. The motion carried unanimously. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 2/19/98 Page 6 PUBLIC HEARINGS: EAR -Based Amendments Mayor Russo declared the public hearing open, which was duly advertised on February 12, 1998. Kim Glas, Principal Planner, stated that the public hearing was to consider the Local Planning Agency's recommendation to transmit the EAR -Based amendments and requested that the proceedings of the Local Planning Agency meeting be made a part of the record for the public hearing so that all of the testimony and discussion does not have to be repeated. Ms. Glas stated that staff recommended approval of the EAR -Based Amendments as modified by the ERRATA Sheet and modified by the Local Planning Agency in policies 1.1.5.A.1 and 1.1.5.1.A.2. Councilwoman Monroe made a motion, seconded by Councilwoman Monroe to submit the EAR -Based Amendments to the Department of Community Affairs of the staff initiated EAR -Based Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. The motion carried unanimously. Resolution 19, 1998 Kim Glas, Principal Planner, stated that this was a request for concurrent processing. She stated that staff received three petitioners for small scale amendments on December 1, 1997. Ms. Glas stated that the three petitions were still in the sufficiency stage and where not complete applications that had been moved to the review process. Ms. Glas stated after meeting with the petitioner, staff felt that it would be helpful for the specific site plans for the parcels to be processed concurrently with the land use amendments. She stated that the use of the land being processed was a mixed use. Ms. Glas stated be seeing the proposed concept plans, it would help staff to understand what was being proposed by the petitioner. Ms. Glas stated that in this case staff was advocating that the City consider concurrent processing of the site plan with the land use changes. She stated that the Council policy established by Resolution 148, 1996 which prevent concurrent processing without Council approval. Ms. Glas stated that Council's approval would come by means of a developer agreement which had been prepared by way of Resolution 19, 1998. Ms. Glas stated that staff recommended that the petitioner work with the surrounding residents at the preapplication stage which was why there was so much interest in the petition at this early stage. In response to a question by Mayor Russo, David Acton, City CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 2/19/98 Page 7 Attorney, stated that the approval to allow staff to proceed with both of the petitions simantenously does not mean that the Council would see any of the site plans, and that only staff would see the site plans at the same time as seeing the amendments being processed but would not be brought to Council until the amendments were presented for consideration first. Roxanne Manning, Growth Management Director, stated that they would present the petitions to Council together and that if the Council did not approved the land use change, the zoning changes would not be approved either. In response to a question by Mayor Russo, Ms. Glas stated that staff supports the concurrent process request because it was mixed use and the size of the parcels. Ms. Glas stated that it was not clear that a mix of uses could be accomplished on the parcels until staff saw a concept plan. Hank Skokowski, representing the petitioner, stated that the properties that were the subject of the three language plan amendments were on PGA Boulevard and were already subject to the overlay district and were mandatory planned unit developments. Mr. Skokowski stated that the City was in the process of developing standards and guidelines and controls that would guide the City in the future to accomplish mixed use. He stated that the best vehicle of understanding how to properly regulate the guide to this type of development was to look at it in its physical form. Mr. Skokowski stated that the petitioner was very clear that they were at risk and that by Council allowing them to concurrently process these petitions would not mean that they Council was under any obligation to approve the zoning application. Mayor Russo stated that Council received a letter from the different homeowner associations and that residents were in attendance to speak before Council. Jay Adolph, 10690 PGA Boulevard, requested that the Council take not action until the petitioners has provided the residents with additional information. Dan Schusterman, BallenIsles resident, voiced his concern about there being no criteria for mixed use and agreed with all parties to tonight regarding how to proceed with the petitioners request. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 2/19/98 Page 8 Joe Orlando, 5500 Tamblerlane, requested that the staff taken into consideration the traffic count into consideration when reviewing the petitions. Ms. Manning stated that the next Planning and Zoning Commission meeting had been canceled and that staff would hold a public information meeting on Tuesday, February 26, 1998 at 7:30 p.m. to discuss the concept of "The Commons ". Mayor Russo stated that staff would notify the homeowners of where the meeting would be held. Resolution 19, 1998 was postponed until the March 19, 1998 City Council meeting. Ordinance 1, 1998 Mayor Russo declared the Public Hearing open, which was duly advertised 2/4/98 and held on the intent of Ordinance 1, 1998, providing for an amendment to Section 38 -88, Subparagraph (a) of the Code, Entitled "Codes and Standards Adopted" of Chapter 38 Entitled "Fire Prevention and Protection ", to Update Reference to Standard Codes. There being no comments from the public, Mayor Russo declared the Public Hearing closed. Councilwoman Monroe made a motion, seconded by Councilman Clark, to adopt Ordinance 1, 1998 and to place it on second and final reading by title only. The motion was unanimously carried, and the Deputy City Clerk read Ordinance 1, 1998, by title only, on second and final reading. Ordinance 2, 1998 Mayor Russo declared the Public Hearing open, which was duly advertised 2/4/98 and held on the intent of Ordinance 2, 1998, providing for a Waiver to Art in Public Places for Doubletree Hotel. There being no comments from the public, Mayor Russo declared the Public Hearing closed. Councilwoman Monroe made a motion, seconded by Councilman Clark, to adopt Ordinance 2, 1998 and to place it on second and final reading by title only. The motion was unanimously carried, and the Deputy City Clerk read Ordinance 2, 1998, by title only, on second and final reading. Ordinance 3, 1998 Mayor Russo declared the Public Hearing open, which was duly CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 2/19/98 RESOLUTIONS: Page 9 advertised 2/4/98 and held on the intent of Ordinance 3, 1998, providing for a an amendment to Division 3 of Chapter 2 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances Entitled "Education Advisory Board ", Specifically Section 2 -132 "Composition; Appointments; Terms ", Section 2 -135 "Duties and Responsibilities. There being no comments from the public, Mayor Russo declared the Public Hearing closed. Councilman Jablin made a motion, seconded by Councilman Clark, to adopt Ordinance 3, 1998 and to place it on second and final reading by title only. The motion was unanimously carried, and the Deputy City Clerk read Ordinance 3, 1998, by title only, on second and final reading. Resolution 13, 1998 Councilman Clark made a motion to adopt Resolution 13, 1998 with the change to Condition #8 as follows: deleting the word "need to" and substituting the word "shall" and inserting the language "prior to issuance of the building permit ". Councilwoman Monroe seconded the motion which unanimously carried. Resolution 14, 1998 Councilman Clark made a motion to approved Resolution 14, 1998, seconded by Councilwoman Monroe. Councilman Clark made a motion to withdraw the motion, seconded by Councilwoman Monroe. The motion unanimously carried. Councilman Clark made a motion, seconded by Councilman Jablin, to adopt Resolution 14, 1998 with the amendment as follows in Section 1, second paragraph: delete the wording "and common landscaping ", and adding a new sentence to read: Common area landscaping shall be installed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy or prior to December 31, 1998 whichever comes first." The motion unanimously carried. Resolution 16, 1998 Councilman Jablin made a motion to adopt Resolution 16, 1998 with the amendment as follows: delete Section 7 in its entirety and by appointing the following members: Ron Sadaka, Dr. Alan Sara, Monika Adams, Jn Porter, Nona Helsel, Murtaza Kakli and Anne S. Berg. Councilwoman Monroe seconded the motion which unanimously carried. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 2/19/98 Page 10 Resolution 17, 1998 Councilwoman Monroe made a motion, seconded by Councilman Clark, to adopt Resolution 17, 1998, consideration of Appointments of the Election Officials for the General Election to be held in the City on 3/10/98 and the run -ff election on 3/24/98 if same shall be necessary. The motion unanimously carried. ORDINANCES: Ordinance 4, 1998 Ordinance 4, 1998 was postponed until the March 5, 1988 Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 10:45 p.m. APPROVAL: MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO VICE MAYOR LAUREN W. FURTADO COUNCILWOMAN LINDA MONROE COUNCILMAN ERIC JABLIN COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK ATTEST: CINDY HARVEY, DEPUTY CITY CLERK CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS WORKSHOP MEETING FEBRUARY 26, 1998 The February 26, 1998, Workshop Meeting of the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, was called to order at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex located at 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida; and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL The roll was called by the City Clerk and the following elected officials were found to be in attendance: Mayor Joseph R. Russo, Vice Mayor Lauren Furtado, Councilwoman Linda Monroe, Councilman Eric Jablin, and Councilman David Clark. Councilwoman Monroe left the meeting at 9:30 p.m. JOINT MEETING WITH PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Roxanne Manning, Director of Growth Management, reviewed the authority and responsibilities of the City Council, the Landscape Review Committee of Adjustments, the Planning and Zoning Commission, Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee and the Zoning Board of Appeals. Marty Minor, Principal Planner, reviewed the process for zoning, site plan and planned unit development approval. Kim Glas, Principal Planner, reviewed the process for amendments to the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Mayor Russo stated that he hoped this joint meeting would provide for a better understanding of shared responsibilities between the Commission and the Council. Mayor Russo expressed that he wanted the Commission to be very strong and the best organized board in the City and asked that the members of the Commission be tough and thorough. Vice Mayor Furtado felt that it was important for the Commission and the Council to be in sync with philosophies on growth and development in the City. Joel Channing felt that the Commission tried to stick to the rules and rarely bent them for development. Mr. Channing stated that the members of the Commission were mystified when they missed CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP, 2/26/98 2 something, especially when there were drastic changes to a project once it left the Planning and Zoning Commission and received City Council approval. Councilman Clark, referencing the recent church project, stated that it was clear to the City Council that even though it had a negative recommendation, it came to Council with proper conditions. John Glidden felt that the Commission failed on the church issue by recommending denial instead of sending the project on to City Council with proper conditions. Mayor Russo stated that if the Commission denied a project, efforts should still be made to improve the project, and pointed out that if a petitioner would not work with the Commission and forced a denial, he would vote against the project. It was suggested, and agreed upon, that Planning and Zoning Commission recommendations would include their reasons for the recommendation, especially on controversial issues. It was further decided that the Commission would discuss needed Code revisions on agendas that were not crowded with projects. It was further agreed that petitioners would not be placed on an agenda when their submittals were not complete. Mr. Glidden suggested, and the Council agreed, that petitioners would be required to submit a three- dimensional drawing with every project over a certain size and submit full color elevations as well as reduced submittal plans to be included in agenda packets. Councilwoman Monroe asked that rear elevations include some aesthetic creativity, pointing out that the Council has always been sensitive to this issue. Members of the City Council expressed their opinion that a project should never be approved over the objection of the City Engineer. It was also pointed out by Councilman Clark that on projects where the Planning and Zoning Commission makes the final decision they needed to be especially tough because a precedent could be set for the City. CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP, 2/26/98 New Complex Phasing Plan Kevin Radigan of Architects Design Group addressed the City Council regarding the phasing plans for the new municipal complex. Mr. Radigan stated that one phasing alternative would maintain 6 of the 8 tennis courts until March, 1999, by redoing the phasing of the ballfields. The phasing of the entire project would provide for the following order of completion: Gardens Park/Fire Station; Police Department/City Hall; City Center/Parking/Plaza. Mayor Russo expressed his displeasure with not knowing the additional cost for maintaining the tennis courts by leaving the completion of the one ballfield until later in the development plans. Vice Mayor Furtado agreed with Mayor Russo, stating that future reports to Council should contain all the facts, including costs. Councilman Clark and Councilwoman Monroe stated that they preferred that alternatives be presented for Council consideration before ADG worked cost estimates. Mr. Radigan stated that the cost estimated for the entire project, based upon the 75% complete plans was under budget at a cost of $15,163,645.00. Mr. Radigan pointed out that they had been working with a figure of $15,248,211.00, however, the project now had $210,000 in alternates. Mr. Radigan stated that at the next meeting with the City Council he would discuss the Sales Tax Savings Exemption Plan. It was suggested that another workshop meeting be held on March 26, 1998. 800 MHZ North County Communication Tower Location Audrey Wolfe, Director of Facilities Development for Palm Beach County, made a presentation to the City Council regarding the need for a tower to complete the County's 800 MHZ trunked radio system to reduce congestion and coverage inadequacies of the existing radio systems and to provide communications between the Sheriff's Office, Fire Rescue and local government agencies for joint operations and mutual assistance. Ms. Wolfe presented three sites that were determined to meet the needs for the proposed tower. These sites include the North County Courthouse Annex, Burns Road (immediately east of the City's soccer fields) and Seacoast Utilities on Hood Road. Several suggestions were made, including locating a tower on the CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP, 2/26/98 roof of the VA Hospital on 45th Street. It was the suggestion of the City Council that the County research other possible sites within the City that would serve their purpose, but would not impact residents. Ms. Wolfe was directed to again meet with City staff to research other sites within the City that would not impact residents and would meet the criteria set forth by the City's communication tower ordinance. 4 City Sign Re- Design Greg Dunham, Assistant City Manager, presented a miniature example of the re- designed City Sign. Mr. Dunham pointed out that the message was bigger with letters being increased by 50% and that a white background was added to make the sign stand out. The Council directed staff to present the re- design to the Beautification and Environmental Committee at their next meeting and to show the sign to Councilwoman Monroe before the next City Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m. APPROVAL MAYOR JOSEPH R.RUSSO VICE MAYOR LAUREN FURTADO COUNCILWOMAN LINDA MONROE COUNCILMAN ERIC JABLIN COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP, 2/26/98 ATTEST: LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK RESOLUTION 24, 1998 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR, CITY MANAGER AND BILL HYLAND OF THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE TO NEGOTIATE WITH THE JOHN D. AND CATHERINE T. MAC ARTHUR FOUNDATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY TO BE USED AS A CITY PARK; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council desires to purchase property to be used as a City park, including possible tennis courts; and WHEREAS, the John D. And Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation has signed an agreement to negotiate the purchase of property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: SECTION 1, The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, hereby authorizes the Mayor, City Manager and Bill Hyland of Watterson, Hyland and Klett, the City's legal counsel, to negotiate the purchase of property from the John D: And Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, to be used as a park, including possible tennis facilities. SECTION 2.. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF MARCH, 1998. ATTEST: LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK VOTE: COUNCILMAN RUSSO COUNCILWOMAN FURTADO COUNCILWOMAN MONROE COUNCILMAN JABLIN COUNCILMAN CLARK MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency. City Attorney AYE NAY ABSENT Corrections by Councilman Clark and City Attorn.e_y_Act.on CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY FEBRUARY 19, 1998 The February 19, 1998, meeting of the Local Planning Agency was called to order was called to order at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex located at 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida; and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: The roll was called by the Deputy City Clerk and the following elected officials were found to be in attendance: Mayor Joseph R. Russo, Councilwoman Linda Monroe, Councilman Eric Jablin and Councilman David Clark. Vice Mayor Lauren W. Furtado was absent from the meeting. EAR -BASED AMENDMENTS: Kim Glas, Principal Planner, stated that this was a public hearing for consideration of a recommendation to the City Council for transmittal of the EAR -Based Amendments. Ms Glas stated that the amendments were based on the Evaluation Appraisal Report as well as the City's vision. Ms. Glas presented the Council with the adopted portion of the Comprehensive Plan which consisted of the goals, objectives and policies as well as the future land use map and future transportation map. Ms. Glas also presented the ' Council with a copy of documentation which consisted of supporting data and analysis required by 9J5. Ms. Glas stated that the staff reported included summarized changes as requested by the Council and changes recommended by staff. Ms. Glas also presented the Council with an errata sheet ERATFA Sheet. Ms. Glas stated that the Comprehensive Plan was being updated from a 2010 plan to a 2015 plan and that most of the changes were in the goals and objectives policies. She stated that there were a few land use changes which reflect the County's acquisition and eco -sites and the City's acquisitions of park and public areas. Ms. Glas stated that the only private type property being changed was the Nativity Lutheran Church on Holly Drive, from Commercial to Residential Medium. Ms. Glas stated that the Police Department had hired new computer specialists and have a better idea of the number of service calls they have historically handled t=ide c1 as well as the ability to project future service calls. Therefore, staff will review their numbers and would possibly come back before Council adopts the amendments Corrections by Councilman Clark and City Attorne CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY FEBRUARY 19, 1998 The February 19, 1998, meeting of the Local Planning Agency was called to order was called to order at 7:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex located at 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida; and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ROLL CALL: The roll was called by the Deputy City Clerk and the following elected officials were found to be in attendance: Mayor Joseph R. Russo, Councilwoman Linda Monroe, Councilman Eric Jablin and Councilman David Clark. Vice Mayor Lauren W. Furtado was absent from the meeting. EAR -BASED AMENDMENTS: Kim Glas, Principal Planner, stated that this was a public hearing for consideration of a recommendation to the City Council for transmittal of the EAR -Based Amendments. Ms Glas stated that the amendments were based on the Evaluation Appraisal Report as well as the City's vision. Ms. Glas presented the Council with the adopted portion of the Comprehensive Plan which consisted of the goals, objectives and policies as well as the future land use map and future transportation map. Ms. Glas also presented the Council with a copy of documentation which consisted of supporting data and analysis required by 9J5. Ms. Glas stated that the staff reported included summarized changes as requested by the Council and changes recommended by staff. Ms. Glas also presented the Council with an errata sheet ERATA Sh . Ms. Glas stated that the Comprehensive Plan was being updated from a 2010 plan to a 2015 plan and that most of the changes were in the goals and objectives policies. She stated that there were a few land use changes which reflect the County's acquisition and eco -sites and the City's acquisitions of park and public areas. Ms. Glas stated that the only private type property being changed was the Nativity Lutheran Church on Holly Drive, from Commercial to Residential Medium. Ms. Glas stated that the Police Department had hired new computer specialists and have a better idea of the number of service calls they have historically handled handed as well as the ability to project future service calls. Therefore, staff will review their numbers and would possibly come back before Council adopts the amendments iCORRECTIONS PER COUNCILMAN CLARK CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 2/19/98 AWARDING OF BIDS: Page 4 tremendous amount of construction experience and had worked on numerous number of public projects, had been added to the MCAT Team. Mr. Friedman stated that the City had to contract out for an outside asbestos abatement investigation and as a result of the investigation learned that asbestos was present in all buildings at minimal levels. Mayor Russo requested that Council be presented with an asbestos report at the next meeting. Mr. Friedman stated that there were two formats of asbestos; air borne which was of danger, and nonfriable, which was found in ceilings, tiles, linoleum and dry wall compound. wlucl-1 -is w1��rV� i� I�aa been located. He stated that as long as the nonfriable absetos was not disturbed, there was no problem, in that the asbestos found at City Hall was of the nonfriable kind. EAP Request for Proposal Councilwoman Monroe made a motion to approve the awarding of the RFP for Employee Assistance Program to The Children and Family Services of Palm Beach County, in the amount of $8,112. The motion was seconded by Councilman Clark and unanimously carried. Dump Truck Councilwoman Monroe made a motion to approve staff s recommendation to piggy -back off Palm Beach County Fleet Management contract and award the bid for a one ton dump truck to Ed Morse Chevrolet in the amount of $29,586. The motion was seconded by Councilman Clark and unanimously carried. ITEMS BY MAYOR & COUNCIL: Councilwoman Monroe Councilwoman Monroe stated that there was a Beautiful Palm Beaches grant opportunity available and presented staff with the information. In response to a question by Councilwoman Monroe, Ms. Herakovich stated that the mockup version of the City sign would be presented at the February 26, 1998 Council workshop. Councilman Jablin Councilman Jablin stated that he attended the CAN Annual meeting and that City Manager Herakovich and staff did a great job of presenting where the City was with the municipal complex project. CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 2/19/98 ' Page 5 Mayor Russo Mayor Russo stated that he attended a Tennis Committee meeting and that the Committee supported the City 100% to build the courts on the site near Duncan Middle School. Mayor Russo stated that the attended a Municipal League Meeting and briefed the Council on the discussion that took place. Mayor Russo stated that the City would host the General Membership Meeting on April 22, 1998 at the Burns Road Community Center. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Ray Beledinas, Sr. Ray Beledinas, Sr., business owner on Northlake Boulevard addressed the Council regarding the formation and purpose of the Northlake Boulevard Task Force. Councilwoman Monroe provided a brief history of the formation and purpose of the Task Force. She stated that the next meeting would be held on March 11, 1998 in the Council Chambers at North Palm Beach. CONSENT AGENDA: Councilwoman Monroe requested that Item #4 and Councilman Jablin requested that Item #6 on the Consent Agenda be pulled for amendments. Councilman Clark made a motion approve the Consent Agenda with Items #4 and #6 removed. Councilman Jablin seconded the motion which unanimously carried. The following items were approved on the Consent Agenda: 1. Approval of 1/29/98 City Council Workshop Minutes. 2. Approval of 1/29/98 Joint Meeting with City of Riviera Beach Minutes. 3. Approval of 2/5/98 Local Planning Agency Minutes. 5. Resolution 12, 1998 - Consideration of Approval for an Expression of Opposition to Florida House Bill 3 29 1. 7. Resolution 18, 1998 - Consideration of Approval Providing for Support of Permanent and Consistent Funding for Regional Planning Councils. Councilman Clark made a motion to approved the Minutes of 2/5/98 with an amendment on Page 4, three paragraphs from the bottom as follows: delete the word "much" and replace with the word "sufficient ". The motion was seconded by Councilwoman Monroe which unanimously carried. Resolution 15, 1998 It was the consensus of the City Council that the Education Advisory CORRECTIONS PER COUNCILMAN-CLARK-' CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 2/19/98 Page 9 Councilwoman Monroe made a motion, seconded by Councilman Clark, to adopt Ordinance 2, 1998 and to place it on second and final reading by title only. The motion was unanimously carried, and the Deputy City Clerk read Ordinance 2, 1998, by title only, on second and final reading. Ordinance 3, 1998 Mayor Russo declared the Public Hearing open, which was duly advertised 2/4/98 and held on the intent of Ordinance 3, 1998, providing for a an amendment to Division 3 of Chapter 2 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances Entitled "Education Advisory Board ", Specifically Section 2 -132 "Composition; Appointments; Terms ", Section 2 -135 "Duties and Responsibilities. There being no comments from the public, Mayor Russo declared the Public Hearing closed. Councilman Jablin made a motion, seconded by Councilman Clark, to adopt Ordinance 3, 1998 and to place it on second and final reading by title only. The motion was unanimously carried, and the Deputy City Clerk read Ordinance 3, 1998, by title only, on second and final reading. RESOLUTIONS: Resolution 13, 1998 Councilman Clark made a motion to adopt Resolution 13, 1998 with the change to Condition #8 as follows: deleting the word "need to" and substituting the word "shall" and inserting the language "prior to issuance of the building permit ". Councilwoman Monroe seconded the motion which unanimously carried. Resolution 14, 1998 Councilman Clark made a motion to approved Resolution 14, 1998, seconded by Councilwoman Monroe. Councilman Clark made a motion to withdraw the motion, seconded by Councilwoman Monroe. The motion unanimously carried. Councilman Clark made a motion, seconded by Councilman Jablin, to adopt Resolution 14, 1998 with the amendment as follows in Section 1, second paragraph: delete the wording "and common landscaping ", and adding a new sentence to read: Common area landscaping shall be installed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy or prior to December 31, 19998 whichever comes first." The motion unanimously carried. CORRECT_IfONS. PER COUNCILMAN`- CLARK CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING 2/19/98 Page 10 Resolution 16, 1998 Councilman Jablin made a motion to adopt Resolution 16, 1998 with the amendment as follows: delete Section 7 in its entirety and by appointing the following members: Ron Sadaka, Dr. Alan Sara, Monika Adams, Jn Porter, Nona Helsel, Murtaza Kakli and Anne S. Berg. Councilwoman Monroe seconded the motion which unanimously carried. Resolution 17, 1998 Councilwoman Monroe made a motion, seconded by Councilman Clark, to adopt Resolution 17, 1998, consideration of Appointments of the Election Officials for the General Election to be held in the City on 3/10/98 and the run -off election on 3/24/98 if same shall be necessary. The motion unanimously carried. ORDINANCES: Ordinance 4, 1998 Ordinance 4, 1998 was postponed until the March 5, 1988 Council meeting. ADJOURNMENT: There being no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 10:45 p.m. APPROVAL: MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO VICE MAYOR LAUREN W. FURTADO COUNCILWOMAN LINDA MONROE COUNCILMAN ERIC JABLIN COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK ATTEST: CINDY HARVEY, DEPUTY CITY CLERK CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover. Memorandum Date: February 19. 1998 Subject/Agenda Item: Consideration of Approval: Petition SP- 97 -01, by Henry Skokowski, agent for Northlake Partners, is requesting a Site Plan approval for a proposed 91,063 square foot shopping center to be named NorthMil Plaza. The proposed center will be anchored by an "Albertson's" supermarket and will contain three "out - parcels" for future development. The shopping center is to be located on a 11.5 acre parcel with a CG -1 General Commercial zoning designation. The parcel is generally located at the northeast comer of Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard (13- 42S -42E). Recommendation/Motion: Staff recommends approval of Resolution 2, 1998, with twenty (20) conditions of approval. Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Costs: $ 0 Council Action: Total City Attorney Growth Management Finance N/A ACM Human Res. N/A Advertised: Other N/A Date: Paper: Submitted by: [ x ] Not Required Growth Management Affected parties Director Approved by: [ ] Notified City Manager [ x j Not required [ ] Approved_ $ 4 [ ] Approved wi i, Current FY [ ] Denied Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: [ IOperating [ ] Other N/A Budget Acct #:: Attachments: Resolution 2, 1998 Site Plan Landscape Plan Map: Site Area Narrative: Revisions Memos: City Manager, Building Official, City Engineer, City Forester, Seacoast Director, Fire Dept., Police Dept. Sound Study Report Letter: Albertson's Letters: Homeowner [ ] None Agenda Cover Memorandum Page 2 BACKGROUND: Location. Zonina. and Land Use Date: February 19, 1998. Henry Skokowski, agent for Northlake Partners, is requesting a Site Plan approval for a proposed retail center to be named NorthMil Plaza. The 11.5 acre site has a zoning designation of CG -1 General Commercial. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation is Commercial. The site is bounded on the north by the Palm Beach Square residential subdivision with an RL -1 Low Residential zoning designation; to the east by the Palm Beach Square residential subdivision with an RL -1 Low Residential zoning designation and commercial retail with a CG -1 General Commercial zoning designation; to the south by commercial retail with a Palm Beach Gardens zoning designation of CG -1 General Commercial and commercial retail with Palm Beach County zoning designation CN Neighborhood Commercial; to the west by commercial retail with CG -1 General Commercial designation. The subject site is bounded by Military Trail on the west and Northlake Boulevard to the south. The proposed center will be anchored by a 50,157 square foot Albertson's Supermarket. The center will also contain 28,306 square feet of additional retail space. The shopping center will also contain three (3) outparcels. The two parcels along Military Trail are 0.77 acres and 0.59 acres in size and the outparcel along Northlake Boulevard will contain a 3500 square foot drive -thru restaurant. The outparcels are intended to be developed at a later date as a restaurant without a drive thru, a financial institution with a drive thru or a retail building. The total area for the main center and the three outparcels will be 91,063 square feet. : .::. :..:.:::: :.::::.:..:::.:::. «: . Pi..1�k7. ...: .: : .::.:..................:::. , :::::::..:::::............. .. ............................... Zoning: CG -1 Required(Allowed Provided Compliance Building Site Area Minimum Site Area of 1 11.5 acre yes acre Building Site Width Minimum 100 feet 175 feet yes Building Lot Coverage Maximum of 35% 18.1% yes Height Limit Maximum 36 feet 36 feet yes Agenda Cover Memorandum Page 3 Date: February 19, 1998. 1, Front 50 feet 477 feet yes Side 15 feet 51 feet yes Side Facing Street 40 feet 152 feet yes Rear 15 feet 166 feet yes Required Number 393 (Disabled 8) 393 (Disabled 8) yes Stall Size 10 feet by 18.5 feet 10 feet by 20 feet yes Points 14,027 15,346 yes Landscaped Suffers Front 15 feet 15 feet yes Side 15 feet 15 feet yes Side on R.O.W. 15 feet 15 feet yes Rear 8 feet 8 feet yes Parking Areas Every parking stall Every parking stall yes within 40 feet of tree within 40 feet of tree Preservation Section 98 -1 intent One (1) Banyan tree yes preserved, 24 +1- Sable Palms Ground Signs 1 1,380 feet of R.O.W. = two ground signs yes two (2) ground signs Setbacks 15 feet front property 15 feet yes line; Greater than 50 feet 50 feet from side property line Dimensions length=1 5 feet max. length=15 feet max. yes height-- 10 feet max. height--1 0 feet max. 1 Area =60 square feet Area =27.4 square feet max. max. Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19, 1998. Page 4 Wall Signs 1 per tenant elevation 1 per tenant elevation yes facing a R.O.W. facing a R.O.W. eca f >:::: ><:: >::::::;: >:::: >::: >:: :<::::; Color Sec. 110- 37(c): "All All letters to be yes signs shall be of fabricated aluminum uniform type, color and channel letters with material blue acrylic faces and internally illuminated with white neon tubing. Lighting Sec. 118=474 (4) Average footcandle in yes Minimum 0.6 parking area = 3.78fc footcandles in outdoor Max. off site= .13 fc areas, 1.0 footcandles in vehicle use area Buildina and Materials The main retail center will contain 78,463 square feet, including the Albertson's supermarket and other retail spaces. This building will have a maximum facade height of 36 feet. The west and south facing elevation will have a "light beige 1065" stucco exterior for the main facade with "white 869" raised stucco banding along the top of the parapet and below the tenant sign facade. The covered walkway will be supported by columns running the length of the front retail area. The two (2) foot concrete columns will have a "light beige 1065" stucco exterior with a one (1) foot base with "Dark beige 1291" color six inch "light beige 1065" banding just above. The top of the column will have a "white 869" colored band. The interior of the covered walkway will have a "dark beige 1291" stucco finish. The aluminum storefront frames will be colored "white 869." The main facade will feature circular architectural accents two (2) feet in diameter and colored 111219 dark beige." The roof facade will consist of a barrel tile roof with a four (4) color blend mix of terra cotta and grey color schemes. The rear facing elevations will consist of "light beige 1065" exterior walls with a stucco finish. There will also be several "white 869" aluminum "down spouts" running vertically down the exterior walls. Rooftop equipment will be screened with an extension of the stucco wall, which will run the length of the rear facing elevations. Sianaae Agenda Cover Memorandum Page 5 Date: February 19, 1998. Signage at NorthMil Plaza will consist of two monument ground signs and wall signs (one (1) per tenant) on the main retail center. The Albertson's supermarket store sign will have # 3630 -167 medium blue and #3630 -36 dark blue lettering with white outlines. All other tenant signs will have blue acrylic faced lettering. All signs will consist of metal channel letters with bronze trim caps. The two identical monument ground signs will consist of an aluminum sign cabinet with a "beige #1219" smooth stucco finish. Both signs will have the words "Albertson's" and "NorthMil Plaza" on their copy area, with space allowing for one other tenant name. The sign base will be covered with 12" x 12" ceramic tiles, the top row being "dark beige 1219" and the bottom two rows " light beige 1219." The lettering for "Albertson's" will include an internally illuminated #732 white plexiglass letter faces with #3630 -167 medium blue and #3630 -36 dark blue vinyl overlay. The lettering for "NorthMil Plaza" will include internally illuminated sans -serif style letters with a #7328 white plexiglass letter faces with #3630 -36 dark blue vinyl overlay. .tack Hanson has recommended approval for all signage for the site. Parkin The number of required spaces for the proposed 78,463 square foot main retail building is 393. The petitioner is proposing 393 spaces. The number of parking required for the main retail building was calculated by the petitioner using the "Shopping Center" classification found in the Land Development Regulations. This standard requires one space per 200 square feet of gross floor area, excluding theaters. Parking standards using the "Restaurant" criteria, however, require one space for each three seats plus one space per employee on the shift of greatest employment. Staff is recommending that this criteria be applied to any free standing restaurant constructed in any one of the three outparcels to help alleviate parking space shortages in the future. Landscaping The petitioner has provided 15,346 points of landscaping. The Code requires 14,027 points of landscaping. The petitioner has provided 15 -foot landscaped buffers along public right -of -ways and all other property boundaries in accordance with the Code. The petitioner has also met the requirement that all parking spaces on site will be within 40 feet of a tree. The petitioner has met the intent of the Code by preserving one (1) strangler fig tree and 24 +/- sabal palms. In response to comments by the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee, the landscape plan was revised to indicate column locations along the promenade and five (5) Sabal palms along the northern elevation of the Albertson's. In addition, the landscape Agenda Cover Memorandum Page 6 Date: February 19, 1998. plan has been revised to show an increase from 12 foot to 14 -16 foot trees along the residential perimeter. The tree spread has been increased to 20 -25 feet and the caliper increased from 5" to 51/2." Traffic Conditional traffic concurrency was determined by Assistant City Engineer Lynnette Lanning in her memo dated October 23, 1996. Traffic concurrency was conditioned upon the buildout date being no later than December 31, 1999. The site plan includes dimensions for the right turn lanes and right -of -way dedications on Military Trail The petitioner has submitted a drainage statement which determined that legal positive outfall will be achieved by using a "weir bleeder system which will connect to the existing inlet located at the northeast comer of the site." In her October 23, 1996 memo, Assistant City Engineer Lynette Lanning granted conditional drainage concurrency based on whether or not the proposed outfall system can meet the City's performance standards. The petitioner has also responded to site plan committee questions regarding wet retention water treatment. The treatment used will be a combination of dry pre- treatment through exfiltration trenches and the use of pollutant baffles at the drainage inlets throughout the site. The City Engineer had a concern that the 40- year -old drainage outfall system .(existing on- site inlet and piping) may have deteriorated to the point where it would inadequately drain the developed site. The petitioner's engineer proposed that the development of the site would actually decrease the volume of runoff into the outfall system. As requested by the City Engineer, the petitioner submitted a videotaped surveillance of the outfall system to verify its integrity. In addition, the petitioner submitted detailed drainage calculations to verify that the volume of water flowing through the outfall system would decrease as a result of site development. Assistant City Engineer Tammy Jacobs has indicated that the drainage pipe appears in good condition. However, she does note that there is tree root infestation in an existing catch basin on the site. She is recommending that this be cleared and any structural damage repaired. Lighting The petitioner has submitted a photometric site plan showing the distribution of lighting foot candles. The highest foot candle reading in the adjacent residential area is .13 foot Agenda Cover Memorandum Page 7 Date: February 19,1998. candles, below the minimum .6 foot candle required on site. The highest on -site foot candle reading is 9.77 fc, located on the drive -aisle directly in front of the main retail building (west elevation). The lowest foot candle reading is 0, located along the eastern boundary, behind the main retail plaza. The code requires that there be an average foot candle reading of 0.6 for general parking and pedestrian area and 1.0 in the vehicle use area only. For this site, the average foot candle readings are 4.36 fc for the drive aisles, and 3.78 fc for the parking areas. The average foot candle figures exceed the minimum required by code. Ms. Jacobs has signed off on the revised lighting plan in her memo dated August 12, 1997. Staff has a concern that the 30 foot high parking lot light poles are too high due to the adjacent residential area. The petitioner has responded to these concerns by lowering the light poles along the northern and eastern boundaries to 20 feet. The surrounding residents in the "Palm Beach Square" residential subdivision have expressed concerns about the necessity of the development proposed for the property adjacent to them. The petitioner has held several meetings with area residents concerning this project. A neighboring City resident, Linda Peters of 1016 Woodfield Circle, has expressed a concern for the necessity of an additional retail plaza in this vicinity (see attached). Linda Garcia, another neighboring resident also expresses her concern about additional commercial development along Northlake Boulevard (see attached). Other concerns by residents and property owners, expressed at the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee, included: 1. Further congestion reducing access to Military Trail at Arbor Way and Northlake Boulevard at Keating Drive. 2. The addition of a high traffic volume curb -cut along Military Trail and its interaction with the existing sidewalk (utilized daily by Grove Park Elementary schoolchildren). 3. Safety concerns regarding the large wet retention area located on the eastern end of the site. 4. Noise associated with loading activities in the rear of the shopping plaza. 5. Easy accessability to neighboring homes from the proposed development (regarding criminal activity). 6. Overall intensity of commercial density along Northlake Boulevard is having a detrimental effect on nearby City residential neighborhoods. Agenda Cover Memorandum Page 8 Date: February 19,1998. 7. The adjacent commercial property owner on Northlake Boulevard has expressed concern to staff that the site's easternmost ingress along Northlake Boulevard is too close to their westernmost egress and this could be a potential traffic hazard. The conversion of the site's easternmost ingress /egress to a westbound egress -only situation would alleviate the property owner's concern. Staff Comments Planning and Zoning As of the last City Council meeting, several issues were still of serious concern to Staff. They are as follows: (1) Tree Preservation: Staff has a concern that the petitioner has not made every effort to meet the intent of Section 98 -1 of the landscape code, which requires the preservation of trees. The petitioner has proposed the preservation of (1) one strangler fig and the relocation on site of +/- 24 sabal palm trees. The City Forester has commented, however, that the petitioner has not done everything possible to prevent the removal of an old growth stand of slash pine trees in the northeast corner of the site (see attached memo). City Forester Mark Hendrickson has reviewed the petition and has commented in his memo dated December 2, 1997 (see attached exhibit). The following is a summary of his concerns: (1) Additional landscaping should be added to the Northlake medians (2) Additional space is needed for the strangler fig preservation, especially now that the Boston Market is no longer proposed. (3) Additional tree preservation could be managed on site, particularly the stand of old pine trees at the northeast corner of the site. (4) Additional tall plantings could be managed along the front of the retail plaza to create a more unified effect. The petitioner has addressed the concern regarding the conflict between the conceptual drainage plan and the preserved strangler fig. The Site Plan Appearance and Review Committee did not recommend conditions of Agenda Cover Memorandum Page 9 Date: February 19, 1998. approval based on the City Forester's comments. Optimally, staff would like to see some of Mr. Hendrickson's concerns addressed by way of a condition(s) of approval. (2) Noise and Associated Nuisances: Staff had a concern that loading and unloading activities may be disruptive to neighboring residents due to their close proximity to the rear of shopping center and that this activity will exceed the decibel levels permitted in Section 118 -299, Performance Standards. City staff conducted a preliminary noise study at a comparable Albertson's site on Indiantown Road in Jupiter. The results of the study indicate that noise levels produced by on -site activity at a distance equivalent to the adjacent homes at NorthMil site exceed the maximum decibel levels allowed by the City's performance standards. City staff hired an independent acoustical engineer to conduct a sound study using data from both the subject site and the test site at Indiantown Road. The City's engineering consultant has reached the following conclusion: The initial reading from the test site indicated LEQ (average) readings of 59.2 dB, in excess of the code maximum of 55 dB. However, this reading was in absence of any type of noise barrier or operational mitigation. The City's consulting engineer agreed that the noise level readings could be reduced to below the maximum daytime levels required through additional physical improvements to the site including: 7 a. The installation of an eight (8) foot wall along portions of the east and north property lines b. Enclosure of the loading area truck well C. The installation of two (2) foot high sound absorption material as described in the site plan dated January 6, 1998 along the eight foot wall d. The installation of pavement markings and signage along the eastern and northern drive aisles prohibiting the idling of delivery vehicles. The petitioner has made the necessary revisions to the site plan to achieve the recommended mitigation. In addition to these improvements, staff is recommending the following conditions of approval to mitigate excessive noise levels: (a) All deliveries shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. (b) All refrigerated trucks shall be required to switchr off refrigeration equipment while on site. (c) All vehicles shall be prohibited from stopping or standing with engines idling on the Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19, 1998. Page 10 north and east sides of the shopping center. (d) The petitioner will agree to limit garbage collection to the hours between 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, to the best ability of the City's waste collector, Waste Management, Inc. (e) Design and Operation of the property shall be conducted in such a manner so as to avoid pure tones and impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and east property lines, and mechanical and electrical equipment selected for the project shall not emit pure tones or impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and east property lines. The City's Sound Consultant, Fernando Levi of Levi Engineering Corporation, has signed off on the petitioner's sound mitigation plan. (3) Parking Staff feels that calculating parking for future "stand alone" restaurants utilizing the shopping center criteria will not provide for adequate parking on the site, particularly if additional restaurants open in the shopping center. To properly address this concern, staff is recommending the following condition of approval: (1) When the "future development areas" designated for restaurants are developed, the parking calculations shall be based on the "Restaurant and Grill" criteria as defined in Section 118 -476 of the City's LDRs. (4) Pedestrian Safety Planning and Zoning staff, neighborhood residents, and the Police Department have expressed concern over pedestrian safety. Police Sergeant Jay Spencer has responded to neighborhood concerns about pedestrian /vehicular conflicts, particularly at the proposed Military Trail exit. Neighbors are concerned because this segment of Military Trail sidewalk is used by children attending the Grove Park School. The Police Department has documented evidence of accidents involving pedestrians at a similar exit onto Military Trail at Gardens Park Plaza. To address these concerns, the Police Department is recommending the relocation of the crosswalk at the Military Trail access road from adjacent to Military Trail to a point midway between Military Trail and the parking lot. Also, brick pavers should be utilized at the crosswalk point to emphasize the pedestrian crossing area (this method was applied at Promenade Plaza). Sgt. Spencer also recommends school crossing signage to caution drivers exiting the shopping center at the crosswalk point (see attached). Thick vegetation and /or decorative barricades should also be utilized to prevent pedestrians from crossing where there is no designated crosswalk. This design Agenda Cover Memorandum Page 11 Date: February 19, 1998. has been endorsed by the Florida chapter of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CEPTED). The petitioner has responded to these concerns by proposing a similar configuration to what was suggested by the Police Department and the Planning and Zoning staff, as shown in the January 6, 1998 site plan. The Police Department feels that this configuration sufficiently addresses their concern. In addition, staff is recommending the following conditions of approval be added to protect pedestrians utilizing the Military Trail sidewalk during the time of construction of the shopping center: (1) Any modifications to the sidewalk on Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard shall be done on an after -hours basis so as not to interrupt continuous pedestrian use of those sidewalks during the day. (2) The speed hump shall be indicated on the construction.plans to be extended across both ingress and egress travel lanes prior to construction plan approval. Engineering Assistant City Engineer Tammy Jacobs has reviewed the petition and notes in her December 17, 1997 memo that all issues are satisfied or conditionally satisfied with the exception of the entry design at the Military Trail entry drive (see attached comments, issue #11). Ms. Jacobs has indicated her satisfaction with the recommended condition of approval regarding the speed hump. Building Building Official Jack Hanson has examined the drawings and documents regarding signage and recommends approval of both the project identification signs and the wall sign criteria. He endorses the tenant sign guide lines as presented (see attached exhibit). Police See "pedestrian safety" Fire Department No further concerns at this time. Seacoast Utilities Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19,1998. Page 12 No further concerns at this time. At its September 2, 1997 meeting, the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee recommended approval by a 4 -3 vote with the condition below. The dissenting members indicated their concerns with the outstanding safety issues and whether a new shopping center was needed. Staff recommended denial of the petition to the Committee. The Committee recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall dedicate the 10 feet of right of way along Military Trail to the FDOT prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. 2. The applicant shall dedicate the six feet of additional right of way along Northlake Boulevard to Palm Beach County prior to the issuance of the first building permit. 3. The applicant shall provide detailed design calculations for onsite drainage improvements as well as possible outfall improvements before construction plan approval. 4. The applicant shall submit a boundary plat, suitable for recording, for review and approval by the City Council before the issuance of the building permit. 5. When the Future Development Area #1 and Future Development Area #2 are constructed, the vehicular access for each parcel shall be limited to the internal north -south drive aisle. 6. Any modifications to the sidewalk on Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard be done on an after -hours basis so as not to interrupt continuous pedestrian use of those sidewalks during the day. Recommendation Staff has attempted to identify and address all the concerns related to the construction of this project. Because the applicant has met all staffs requests, with the exception of a complete site redesign, and addressed staffs concerns through agreeing to the attached conditions, the proposed project meets all applicable City Codes. Because this project site has existing Commercial zoning and land use, and because the project meets all applicable City codes staff must recommend approval of this project with the following conditions: (1) The applicant shall dedicate the ten (10) feet of R.O.W. along Military Trail to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. (Building Division, Development Compliance Officer) Agenda Cover Memorandum Page 13 Date: February 19, 1998. (2) The applicant shall dedicate the 6 feet of additional right of way along Northlake Boulevard to Palm Beach County prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. (Building Division, Development Compliance Officer) (3) The applicant shall provide detailed design calculations for onsite drainage improvements as well as possible outfall improvements before construction plan approval. (City Engineer, Building Division) (4) The applicant shall submit a boundary plat, suitable for recording, for review and approval by the City Council before the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. (City Engineer) (5) When the "Future Development Area # 1" and "Future Development Area #2" are constructed, the vehicular access for each parcel shall be limited to the internal north -south drive aisle. (City Engineer, Planning and Zoning Division) (6) Prior to Construction Plan approval of the "Typical Exfiltration Trench Detail" and data in Exhibit "c" shall be reconciled. (City Engineer, Development Compliance Officer) (7) The existing drainage inlet (catch basin number 5) shall be replaced with a new inlet or properly cleaned of tree roots and any structural drainage repaired prior to certification of occupancy. (City Engineer) (8) Any modifications to the sidewalk on Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard be done on an after -hours basis so as not to interrupt continuous pedestrian use of those sidewalks during the day.(Building Division, Development Compliance Officer) (9) The applicant shall secure a permit from F.D.O.T. for the sidewalk to be placed outside the Military Trail R.O.W. prior to construction plan approval. (Development Compliance Officer, City Engineer) (10) The Boundary Plat shall convey public access to the sidewalk to be placed outside the Military Trail R.O.W. prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. (Development Compliance Officer, City Engineer) (11) The speed hump shall be indicated on the construction plans to be extended across both ingress and egress travel lanes prior to construction plan approval. (City Engineer) (12) All deliveries shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. (Development Compliance Officer, Code Enforcement) Agenda Cover Memorandum Page 14 Date: February 19, 1998. (13) All refrigerated trucks shall be required to switch off refrigeration equipment while on site. (Development Compliance Officer, Code Enforcement) (14). All vehicles shall be prohibited from stopping or standing with engines idling on the north and east sides of the shopping center. (Code Enforcement, Development Compliance Officer) (15) The petitioner will agree to limit garbage collection to the hours between 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, to the best ability of the City's waste collector, Waste Management, Inc. (Code Enforcement, Development Compliance Officer). (16) Design and Operation of the property shall be conducted in such a manner so as to avoid pure tones and impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and east property lines, and mechanical and electrical equipment selected for the project shall not emit pure tones or impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and east property lines. (Code Enforcement, Building Department) (17) When the "future development areas" are developed, the parking calculations shall be based on the criteria as defined in Section 118 -476 of the City's LDRs for each individual use. (Planning and Zoning Division) (18) All shopping center signage shall be internally - illuminated blue acrylic -faced lettering. (19) The applicant shall provide, at their own expense, a crossing guard certified by the City of Palm Beach Gardens Police Department at the shopping center's Military Trail entrance crosswalk during the morning and afternoon school hours, as designated for the Grove Park Elementary School zone. (20) Within thirty (30) days of site plan approval, the petitioner shall amend all applicable plans to reflect the proposed "chevron" monument sign on the north side of the Military Trail entrance. \eat G: \Short Range \SP9701.ST3.wpd CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS Department of Growth Management DATE: February 13, 1998 TO: Bobbie Herackovich, City Manager City Council Members FROM: Rosanne Manning, Growth Management Director RE: Petition SP- 97 -01: NorthMil Plaza Concerns & Revisions The following concerns were raised at the February 5, 1998 Council Meeting regarding the NorthMil Plaza petition. These issues have been addressed by staff and the petitioner as follows: (1) A concern was raised regarding the appropriate nature of a Military Trail median cut so close to the intersection with Northlake Boulevard. The petitioner stated that the median cut for the shopping center entrance was required by the City as part of the traffic concurrency review. Staff has on file an application to the State Department of Transportation for the median cut from the petitioner dated several months before the petitioner applied to the City for traffic concurrency. Although the City did not require the median cut as part of the concurrency review, the concurrency was granted based on an analysis which included this median cut. Staff is currently working to determine if additional concurrency review would be needed should the median cut be deleted from the plan. Staff will have a definitive answer by the next Council meeting. It must also be noted that the right -of -way for Military Trail in this location may not be located within the City's municipal boundaries. Staff is investigating this issue and will have a definitive answer by the next Council meeting. (2) The petitioner has agreed to condition # 19 providing for a crossing guard at the Military Trail entrance crosswalk at the morning and afternoon hours designated for the Grove Park Elementary School zone. (3) The petitioner has addressed the concerns regarding the sight line conflict with the ten (10) foot high sign in the Military Trail entrance median. The petitioner is proposing to replace this sign with a two -sided "chevron" sign in a landscaped area to the north side of the entrance road. (see attached) City Forester Mark Hendrickson and Building Official Jack Hanson have no objections. Staff is recommending condition # 20 which states that "within thirty (30) days of site plan approval, the petitioner shall amend all applicable plans to reflect the proposed "chevron" monument sign on the north side of the Military Trail entrance." cc: Greg Dunham G: \Short Range \sp9701.meml.wpd 0 P i i i a w I� w O ¢ 0 _z z m > I I - END 6' PRECAST CONJETE WALL LB T • 1 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT >►� Ir � �'• AREA io I �� • i _ I T wwq (SI -1) w CL -} (SEE DETAIL) O ,. . II -�� T am a • DEVELOPMENT AREA I r dim � ►. I�3 _ � _ ��. ��• ��� III. ���`�I�,.. 297.00 43- CHAINLINK'-PANEL VIEW FENCE DARK GREEN I I = 1- io�s�eeotwMpwj i I Ir � S h100L CROSSING io I f rm#q %mr-iW& SIGN: I Jo (SI -1) w CL -} (SEE DETAIL) O PAVEMENT 6p �vEaC�yP•) MAnKING II -�� I' ±w�� - � I •'- IIIIIIIiI 0(-)0 am a • DEVELOPMENT AREA I r dim � ►. I�3 _ � _ ��. ��• ��� III. ���`�I�,.. 297.00 43- CHAINLINK'-PANEL VIEW FENCE DARK GREEN I� I Ir � � I I Jo w CL -} I J � W 0(-)0 I wo mzo OOQ ( � I � O > O I z I " a� am a • DEVELOPMENT AREA I r dim � ►. I�3 _ � _ ��. ��• ��� III. ���`�I�,.. 297.00 43- CHAINLINK'-PANEL VIEW FENCE DARK GREEN RESOLUTION 2,1998 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 91,063 SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER TO BE NAMED NORTHMIL PLAZA AND LOCATED ON AN 11.6 ACRE PARCEL AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MILITARY TRAIL AND NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the petitioner, Northlake Partners, is requesting site plan approval for the construction of a 91,063 square foot shopping center to be named Northmil Plaza and located on an 11.6 acre parcel at the northeast corner of Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard; WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed petition is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Council hereby approves the site plan for a 91,063 square foot shopping center to be named Northmil Plaza and located on an 11.6 acre parcel at the northeast corner of Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard, as described in attachment "A ", which is incorporated as part of this resolution. Section 2, Said construction shall be in accordance with plans on file with the City's Planning and Zoning Division as follows: 1. January 6, 1998 Site Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 2. January 6, 1998 Landscape Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 3. December 12, 1997 Detail Sheet, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 4. January 6, 1998 Landscape Details, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 5. July 3, 1997 Military Trail Landscape Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 6. October 9, 1997 Architectural Elevations, Ted Davis and Associates, Sheet A -1 7. August 19, 1997 Architectural Elevations, Ted Davis and Associates, Sheet A -2 8. January 6, 1998 Architectural Elevations, Ted Davis and Associates, Sheet A -3 9. January 27, 1997 Architectural Elevations, Ted Davis and Associates, Sheets A -4 and A -5 10. October 10, 1997 Sign Details, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 11. December 12, 1997 Lighting Plan and Notes, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 12. December 21, 1997 Conceptual Drainage Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 13. February 11, 1998 NorthMil Plaza Sign Relocation, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet Section 3, Approval is based on the following conditions of being met: (1) The applicant shall dedicate the ten (10) feet of R.O.W. along Military Trail to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. (Building Division, Development Compliance Officer) (2) The applicant shall dedicate the 6 feet of additional right of way along Northlake Boulevard to Palm Beach County prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. (Building Division, Development Compliance Officer) (3) The applicant shall provide detailed design calculations for onsite drainage improvements as well as possible outfall improvements before construction plan approval. (City Engineer, Building Division) (4) The applicant shall submit a boundary plat, suitable for recording, for review and approval by the City Council before the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. (City Engineer) (5) When the "Future Development Area # 1" and "Future Development Area #2" are constructed, the vehicular access for each parcel shall be limited to the internal north -south drive aisle. (City Engineer, Planning and Zoning Division) (6) Prior to Construction Plan approval of the "Typical Exfiltration Trench Detail" and data in Exhibit "c" shall be reconciled. (City Engineer, Development Compliance Officer) (7) The existing drainage inlet (catch basin number 5) shall be replaced with a new inlet or properly cleaned of tree roots and any structural drainage repaired prior to certification of occupancy. (City Engineer) (8) Any modifications to the sidewalk on Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard shall be done on an after -hours basis so as not to interrupt continuous pedestrian use of those sidewalks during the day.(Building Division, Development Compliance Officer) (9) The applicant shall secure a permit from F.D.O.T. for the sidewalk to be placed outside the Military Trail R.O.W. prior to construction plan approval. (Development Compliance Officer, City Engineer) (10) The Boundary Plat shall convey public access to the sidewalk to be placed outside the Resolution 2, 1998 Page 2 Military Trail R.O.W. prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. (Development Compliance Officer, City Engineer) (11) The speed hump shall be indicated on the construction plans to be extended across both ingress and egress travel lanes prior to construction plan approval. (City Engineer) (12) All deliveries shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. (Development Compliance Officer, Code Enforcement) (13) All refrigerated trucks shall be required to switch off refrigeration equipment while on site. (Development Compliance Officer, Code Enforcement) (14) All vehicles shall be prohibited from stopping or standing with engines idling on the north and east sides of the shopping center. (Code Enforcement, Development Compliance Officer) (15) The petitioner shall agree to limit garbage collection to the hours between 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, to the best ability of the City's waste collector, Waste Management, Inc. (Code Enforcement, Development Compliance Officer). (16) Design and operation of all improvements on the property shall be conducted in such a manner so as to avoid pure tones and impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and east property lines, and mechanical and electrical equipment selected for the project shall not emit pure tones or impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and east property lines. (Code Enforcement, Building Department) (17) When the "future development areas" are developed, the parking calculations shall be based on the criteria as defined in Section 118 -476 of the City's LDRs for each outparcel use individually. (Planning and Zoning Division) (18) All shopping center signage shall be internally - illuminated blue acrylic -faced lettering. (19) The applicant shall provide, at their own expense, a crossing guard certified by the City of Palm Beach Gardens Police Department at the shopping center's Military Trail entrance crosswalk during the morning and afternoon school hours, as designated for the Grove Park Elementary School zone. (20) Within thirty (30) days of site plan approval, the petitioner shall amend all applicable plans to reflect the proposed "chevron" monument sign on the north side of the Military Trail entrance. Section 4. This resolution shall be effective upon adoption. Resolution 2, 1998 Page 3 INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF FEBRUARY 1998 MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND LINDA V. KOSIER SUFFICIENCY. CITY ATTORNEY VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR FURTADO COUNCILWOMAN MONROE COUNCILMAN JABLIN COUNCILMAN CLARK Resolution , 1998 Page 4 G: \Short Range \SP9701.RE3.wpd CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: March 5, 1998 Subject/Agenda Item: Consideration of Approval: Petition MISC- 98 -01, Nader Salour, agent for Ballenlsles Development Company, is requesting an approval for Ballenlsles Parcel 19A, to be known as Orchid Cay, entry feature, with associated landscaping, and signage within the Ballenlsles Planned Community District. (13- 42S -43E) Recommendation /Motion: Staff recommends aooroval of Resolution 20 1998 Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ 0 Council Action: City Attorney Total ( ] Approved Growth Management Finance N/A $ 0 ( ] Approved w/ conditions Current FY ACM [ J Denied Human Res. N/A Advertised: Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Other N/A Date: [ J Operating Attachments: Paper: ( x ] Not Required [ ] Other N/A Resolution 20, 1998 Resolution 106, 1997 Submitted by: Affected parties Budget Acct. #: Map: Site Area Site Plan & Elevations Department Director [ ] Notified Landscape plan [ ] None Approved by: City Manager [ x ] Not required BACKGROUND: Location, Zoning and Land Use Nader Salour, agent, is proposing to install an entrance feature, landscaping, and signage for the site at Pacel 19A, to be known as "Orchid Cay ", located within Ballenlsles PCD. Parcel 19A was approved October 9, 1997 by Resolution 106, 1997 for 66 zero lot line detached single family homes, and did not include approval of the entry feature. However, the approved plans did indicate the proposed location of the project signage. The one inconsistency between this petition was with the approved landscape plan due to the water feature. A new landscape plan for the entry features is part of this petition. The proposed entry features will be located at the northern access to the community off of Fairwinds Avenue and the southern access off of East Island Drive. The Fairwinds Avenue entry feature is a decorative water fountain and sign located within the community's street median. The fountain wall is beige and the sign is verde green in the typical style of the Ballenisles community signage. The East Island Drive entry feature contains a wall sign on the western side of the entrance, and a single decorative column on the east side of the entrance. Both are in the same style and colors as the northern feature, minus the fountain. The landscaping has been enhanced to accent the new features. Building Official Jack Hanson has reviewed the plans and has no adverse comments. City Forester Mark Hendrickson, has reviewed this petition and has no adverse comments. RESOLUTION 20 , 1998 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE SITE PLAN FOR PARCEL 19A, ORCHID CAY, LOCATED WITHIN THE BALLENISLES PCD, AS ORIGINALLY APPROVED BY RESOLUTION 106,1997, FOR ENTRY FEATURE, SIGN AND LANDSCAPING, AND PROVIDING FOR THE EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 106, 1997, approving a site plan for Parcel 19A, located within the BallenIsles Planned Community District; and WHEREAS, the original approval for 66 zero lot line detached homes did not include approval of an entry feature and sign; and WHEREAS, an application has been submitted seeking to amend the approved site plan and landscape plan to include an entry feature and sign; and WHEREAS, the City's Growth Management Department has reviewed this application and has determined that the amendment to the site plan and landscape plan is consistent with the approved plans, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: Section 1, The City Council of Palm Beach Gardens hereby approves an amendment to Resolution 106, 1997, approving a site plan for Parcel 19A, known as Orchid Cay, located within BallenIsles PCD, for the construction of an entry feature and sign with associated landscaping. Section 2. Said construction and installation shall be consistent with plans on file with the City's Growth Management Department as follows: October 28, 1997 Layout/ Material Plan, Krent Weiland Design, Inc., Sheets L -1 to L -3. 2. January 7, 1998 Planting Plan, Krent Weiland Design, Inc., Sheets L -1 to L -4. Section 3: This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF FEBRUARY 1998. MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO ATTEST: LINDA V. KOSIER VOTE: MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR FURTADO COUNCILWOMAN MONROE COUNCILMAN JABLIN COUNCILMAN CLARK APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY AYE NAY ABSENT RF SOLI" TION 106, 1997 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS. FLORIDA. PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF 66 SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED UNITS ON 19.66 ACRES ON PARCEL 19A IN THE BALLENISLES PLANNED CONINWNITY DEVELOPMENT; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City has received an application to approve a Site Plan for the construction of 66 single family detached units on 19.66 acres on Parcel 19A within the Ballenlsles Planned Community Development, and WHEREAS, the City's Growth Management Department has determined that approval of said application is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PAUN1 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: Section. 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens. Florida, approves a site p!a n for the construction of 66 sin-zle family detached units on 19.66 acres on Parcel 19.E located �%:Iihin the Ballenl;les Planned Community Development. ,cc t, _', Sal npproval shall he consistent with plans tiled with the City's Gro%N,th \ l,tnavcmerrt Decal tniert as S.ptember 1). I 9s)7 Site Plan, Urban Design Studio. 1 Si:eet July l 1. 1 k)')7 Landscape Plan, Krent Wieland Design, Inc:.. Sheet L -': a:_•u�t �, l9')7 Roadway tandscape Pla,i. Kr eat Wie'.and Design. Irc.. 4 Sheets 4 11,?. i Preliminar, Landscape Plan for Sabate!lo Homes. Arthur J. \tlson. Landscape :architect. I Sheet .lone 1'. ! �1�)'• `lode! .� Floor Plaa, Kunik K associates, Sheet ?► !u!y 1 -)7 lode! A Architectural Elevations, Kunik & Associates. Sheet A July _. 1, L) 7 Viodel B Floor Plan and .architectural Elevations, Kunik R Associates. Sheets _k; & A5 ' . Aw —rust 31j, 1997 .\todel C Floor Plan and Architectural Elevations, Kunik A, .-ssrciates. Sheets Al & A6 Section 3. Said site plan approval shall comply with the fol!;itivin` conditions: r�► 'rhe minimum crown of road for Pod 19A, served by lake 4. shall be established at or above Lake 4 peak stage for the 10 year, ! day storm. No t�ko adjacent fumes shall have the same combination of exterior wall and trim color. Section 4. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS THE DAY OF OCTOBER, 1997. PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS THE DAY OF . 1997. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS THE DAY OF _��. %4� , 1q97. r ATTEST: APP VEDAS TO LEGAL FORM AND LINDA V. KOSIER S ICIENCY. BY. WL4 ORNEY VOTE- AYE_ NAY ABSENT N,1 AYOR RUSSO ✓ _ __ �_. �'1(7E MAYOR FI RT DO COUNCILWOMAN 1•ION ROE COUNCiL`i.ati JABLIN COUNti II-NIAN CLARK Resolution 106. 1997 Page 2 0 J F- I �IN w� V uJ (V�J z Q �N 4c �Ys vt kD J F- I �IN w� V uJ (V�J z Q �N I I I i Ph � I � -------- --- ------------ --- - -- 3 rx 51 i Sow i . go �YJ x 6 I I I� Ib I 5 I w I i 3 I I • I � i GOP / El- I / i I � I � I I � I � A n ap � 3 y 4 • go.s a;g og sa �$ a= ar . 8 g a 7 12- v m ° e n .v O• Y m CL O o �.. •s n� aX � :Ei ooa Zw HE e; m v m 9.a 26.4 o8g lag 1 41 °� aJ m 8Es Y Yh r� S id s S All 41 tp A O O z Z � S z,t z .o // 9 13 �Z kZ n z� i z z < � n X. s ti 0 N't r v Z. T s go s� $� • a X s c 3 g's gg A n ap � 3 y 4 • go.s a;g og sa �$ a= ar . 8 g a 7 12- v m ° e n .v O• Y m CL O o �.. •s n� aX � :Ei ooa Zw HE e; m v m 9.a 26.4 o8g lag 1 41 °� aJ m 8Es Y Yh r� S id s S All 41 tp A O O z Z � S z,t z .o // 9 13 �Z kZ n z� i z z < � n X. s ti 0 N't r v Z. T �© ■r�! Q� i r �� ON Won wont .... � -psi�� �!!��►� •V 1, one ® W,AIP-PA- LM®RS• b -a r - -- I _ -- - - - - - -�. -- -,: - - - -- - - - .- I PETITION MISC- 98 -01: BALLENISLES PARCEL 19A ENTRY FEATURE SITE NIAP CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: March 5, 1998 Subject/Agenda Item Consideration of approval for petition SP- 97 -17, a request by Henry Skokowski, agent for Northcorp Development Inc., for site plan approval of a 40,000 square foot office building located on lot 3 within Northcorp Planned Community District (PCD). The 3.08 acre site is located at the northwest corner of Burns Road and Riverside Drive. (7- 42S -43E) Recommendation /Motion: v Staff recommends that Resolution 22, 1998 be approved with 2 conditions. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ Council Action: Total City Attorney Growth Management [ J Finance NA $ [ J Approved w /c«,dwws ACM Current FY [ ]Denied Human Res. NA Other NA Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Advertised: Date: [ ] Operating Attachments: Paper: [ ] Other Resolution 22, 1998 [ x ] Not Required Site Plan I Submitted by: Growth Management Director Affected parties [ ] Notified Budget Acct. #:: [ ] None Approved by: City Manager [ x ] Not required Y_uld "A- 1:Ze11111ab; Lot 3, South Park Center is located within Northcorp Planned Community District. The Northcorp PCD is bounded to the north by RCA Boulevard, to the south by Burns Road to the east by FEC Railway and to the west by Interstate 95. On September 21, 1989, City Council approved the plats for "The Northcorp Center" and "The RCA Boulevard Center", by Resolution 82, 1989 and Resolution 83, 1989. On January 18, 1990, City Council approved the plat known as "West Park Center" by Resolution 1, 1990 and the plat known as "South Park Center" by Resolution 2, 1990. Also on January 18, 1990, Ordinance 1, 1990 was adopted by the City Council approving the Northcorp Planned Community District. 1 PROPOSED BUILDING: The petitioner is proposing a 40,000 square foot 2 -story office building on lot 3, within the South Park center of Northcorp Planned Community District. The proposed 2 -story building will be 35 feet in height. The building materials are stucco and pre- cast concrete and the proposed colors are "Mushroom Cream" for the stucco and " Sour Cream" for the pre -cast concrete. TRAFFIC GENERATION: The project is proposed to be completed in a single phase. In accordance with Condition 22 of Ordinance 1, 1990, the petitioner has provided a trip generation study considering all other existing and proposed development to assure that the PCD will not exceed 6063 daily trips. The study has been reviewed and approved by the Traffic Engineer. Condition 22(IV) also requires all parcels within the Plat of South Park Center to provide a signal warrant study to determine if signalization is required at the intersection of Bums Road with Riverside DriveMest Park Drive. The study has been provided by the petitioner and reviewed by the Traffic Engineer. Staff is recommending a condition of approval requiring the provision of signalization if warranted, prior to the issuance of the Building Permit. PARKING: The petitioner has indicated that in an effort to preserve as many trees as possible, and provide sufficient number of parking spaces, the parking stall size is being proposed to be reduced to 9'x18'6 ", a waiver of the requirement regarding the dimensions of parking stalls has been requested by the applicant. City Forester Mark Hendrickson has indicated that the petitioner's proposal of 9'x18.5' parking spaces has increased open space, which in turn provided room for the Oak tree protection. Therefore, the proposed 9'x18.5' parking stalls are acceptable to staff. The petitioner is also requesting for a waiver of the requirement pertaining to the number of loading spaces. Code requires 2 loading spaces for this project, whereas, due to the nature of deliveries expected at the office building and the applicant's desire to preserve trees, the proposed site plan provides for only 1 space at 12'x35'. However, the City Engineer supports the City's LDR requirements pertaining to the number of loading zones. Assistant City Engineer Tammy Jacobs has reviewed the petition and has suggested modification of the entrance to include a 3' wide concrete bull nose extending approximately 42' from the curbed entrance island to prevent left turns by the incoming vehicles. However, the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee, agreed that the petitioner's proposal for the entrance is satisfactory. SIGNS: Access to the site will be from Riverside Drive. A project identification sign has been proposed at the entrance to the site. Building Official Jack Hanson has reviewed the plans and has indicated that the sign must be brought further to the south in order to comply with the 50' side yard setback. The petitioner has requested for a waiver of the sign side setback requirement. Building Official Jack Hanson has no objections to the request for a waiver of setback requirement for ground signs. The petitioner has also requested a waiver to allow six (6) messages on both sign faces of the ground sign. 2 Building Official Hanson is recommending denial of the waiver request to allow six messages. Mr. Hanson has indicated that the signs can be placed on the building. Building Official Hanson has reviewed the wall signs and recommended approval. The petitioner had originally requested for a waiver, however, Mr. Hanson has noted that the wall sign is in compliance with the code. At its January 27, 1998 meeting, the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee voted unanimously (7 -0) to recommend approval of petition SP -97 -17 with the following conditions: 1. Prior to scheduling this petition for a City Council meeting, the traffic warrant study will need to be submitted by the petitioner and reviewed and approved by the City. 2. The approval of this petition is contingent with the approval of the following waivers: a. Waiver of the requirement pertaining to the number of loading spaces (Sec. 118 -569). b. Waiver of the requirement pertaining to the dimensions of the parking stalls (Sec. 118 - 475a.). c. Waiver of the requirement pertaining to the side setback for the signs (Sec.110 -36c) and maximum message allowed on ground signs (Sec.110 -2e). 3. The applicant is required to meet the "Undeveloped Lot Drainage Standards" prepared by Keshavarz & Associates and accepted by the City Engineer. 4. The project shall be limited to a maximum of one ground sign with. a maximum of six tenant names per side for the entire site. Staff is recommending that the waiver request for the additional messages on the ground sign be denied. However, if the City Council wishes to approve the waiver request, staff would recommend a condition of approval limiting the number of messages to six. In addition, per Resolution 2, 1990, staff is recommending the following condition of approval: Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any undeveloped lots in the Plat of South Park center, the contract shall be let for installation of a traffic signal at the Burns Road and Riverside Drive/ West Park Drive intersection including all appropriate pavement markings, signing, lighting and the like as approved, if warranted. Prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy for any land uses in undeveloped lots of the Plat of South Park Center, the traffic signal at the intersection of Burns Road and Riverside Drive/West Park Drive shall be fully operational, if warranted. RESOLUTION 22, 1998 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN OFFICE BUILDING ON 3.08 ACRES ON LOT 3 OF SOUTH PARK CENTER WITHIN NORTHCORP PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens has received an application to approve a site plan for the construction of 40,0000 square -feet of office on 3.08 + /- acres on lot 3 of South Park Center within the Northcorp Planned Community District; and WHEREAS, the City's Growth Management Department has determined that approval of said application is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens hereby approves a site plan for the construction of 40,000 square -feet of office facility on 3.08 + /- acres on lot 3 of South Park Center generally located at the northwest corner of Riverside Drive and Burns Road, within the Northcorp Planned Community District, Section 2. Construction of said development shall be in accordance with following plans on file with the City's Growth Management Department: 1. February 6, 1998, Site Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet. 2. January 9, 1998, Landscape Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet. 3. December 12, 1997, Vegetation Assessment, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet. 4. December 23, 1997, Plant Detail Sheet, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet. 5. December 29, 1997 Site Lighting Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet. 6. January 12, 1998, Conceptual Drainage Plan, Keshavarz & Associates Inc. Sheet lofl. 7. January 20, 1998, Building Elevations, Oliver. Glidden & Partners, Sheet A -2. 8. January 9, 1998, Floor Plans & Roof Plan, Oliver. Glidden & Partners, Sheet A -1. Section 3. Said site plan approval shall comply with the applicable conditions of Ordinance 1, 1990 and the following condition: 1. The applicant is required to meet the "Undeveloped Lot Drainage Standards" prepared by Keshavarz & Associates and accepted by the City Engineer. 2. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any undeveloped lots in the PLAT OF SOUTH PARK CENTER, the contract shall be let for installation of a traffic signal at the Burns Road and Riverside Drive/West Park Drive intersection including all appropriate pavement markings, signing, lighting and the like as approved, if warranted. Prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy for any land uses in undeveloped lots of the PLAT OF SOUTH PARK CENTER, the traffic signal at the intersection of Burns Road and Riverside Drive/West Park Drive shall be fully operational, if warranted. $ectipn 4. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS Resolution 22, 1998 Page 2 DAY OF MARCH 5, 1998. JOSEPH RUSSO, MAYOR ATTEST: LINDA V. KOSIER Im APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY. CITY ATTORNEY VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR FURTADO COUNCILWOMAN MONROE COUNCILMAN JABLIN COUNCILMAN CLARK \bk planning: \shortr— 1 \sp9717.re Resolution 22, 1998 Page 3 r t oTm 1 1' 1� 9 m s'n rnl I v D Northcor Lot 3 i}��1�1�i " "'I`I' 2 p t itfi�� �� r t Section 7, Township 42, Range 43 Paim'Beach Gardens, Florida SITE PLAN Z 'd f 'ON ff+Ol 866i'tL'I0 8dm OI4f115 NSI530 Nuedn WOMB ip O���D �� CSI Cif ►I � � as > Iq p � p =1 , 9 m s'n rnl I v D Northcor Lot 3 i}��1�1�i " "'I`I' 2 p t itfi�� �� r t Section 7, Township 42, Range 43 Paim'Beach Gardens, Florida SITE PLAN Z 'd f 'ON ff+Ol 866i'tL'I0 8dm OI4f115 NSI530 Nuedn WOMB February 24, 1998 RESOLUTION 123, 1998 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF ONE (1) ALTERNATE MEMBER TO THE EDUCATION ADVISORY BOARD OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Section 2 -132 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances provides for the appointment of members to the City of Palm Beach Gardens Education Advisory Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: Section 1. Pursuant to Section 2 -132 of the Palm Beach Gardens Code of Ordinances, is hereby appointed as an alternate member of the Education Advisory Board to fill the unexpired term of Nona Helsel, which term shall expire on October 9, 1999. Section 2. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF MARCH 1998. ATTEST: LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK I: VOTE: MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR FURTADO COUNCILWOMAN MONROE COUNCILMAN JABLIN COUNCILMAN CLARK JOSEPH R. RUSSO, MAYOR APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY CITY ATTORNEY AYE NAY ABSENT CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: March 5, 1998 SubjecVAgenda Item First Reading: Petition TXT -97 -01 Outdoor Seating Ordinance, by City of Palm Beach Gardens Staff, to amend the City's Land Development Regulations to allow for outdoor seating and dining areas within nonresidential and residential districts, excluding single family homes. Recommendation /Motion: Staff recommends City Council approves Ordinance 5, 1998 on its first reading. Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: Costs: $ Council Action: City Attorney Growth Management Total [ ] Finance NA $ [ ] Approved wicm,dinoe, ACM Current FY [ ] Denied Human Res. NA Other NA Funding Source: [ ] Continued to: Advertised: Date: [ ] Operating Attachments: Paper: [ ] Not Required [ ] Other Ordinance 35, 1998 Submitted by: Growth Management Affected parties Budget Acct #:: Director [ ] Notified [ ] None Approved by: City Manager [ ] Not required BACKGROUND: Staff is requesting that the City amend its Land Development Regulations to allow for outdoor seating areas for the purpose of outdoor dining. The need to address outdoor seating areas in the City's Land Development Regulations derives from a code enforcement issue, in which several area restaurants were cited for and warned about illegal dining areas located outside of buildings. 1 Currently, the only reference made to dining facilities by the City's Land Development Regulations is a definition of "Restaurant" in section 78 -2, which is as follows: "means an establishment where food is ordered from a menu, prepared and served for pay primarily for consumption on the premises in a completely enclosed room, under the roof of the main structure or in an interior court. A drive -in restaurant as defined in this section is not a restaurant. A cafeteria shall be deemed a restaurant." In addition, the City's CG -1 (General Commercial) zoning district, where the majority of the City's restaurants are located, has a requirement that "sales, display, preparation and storage is to be conducted within a completely enclosed building ... (Section 118- 206(h))" These two code provisions prohibit outdoor seating and specifically dining as a use within the City. However, it should be noted, that some outdoor seating was approved as part of a site plan approval. For example, the Waterway Cafe was approved with outdoor seating as part of its site plan approval. Staff recognizes that businesses, restaurants, employers and customers desire to provide outdoor seating, particularly in light of the favorable climate for outdoor activities. While staff has an interest in allowing for outdoor seating, it also has concerns regarding this type of activity. Such concerns have led the City to develop an ordinance which would allow for outdoor seating while protecting the health, safety and general welfare of the public. Major concerns to staff regarding outdoor seating include: (1) Parking. The provision of outdoor seating, particularly that of restaurants for the purposes of outdoor dining, may create an expansion of a business' use, therefore expanding the need for parking. Lack of regulation of outdoor seating could allow for businesses to expand their use without demonstrating that adequate parking will still be provided. (2) Public safety and accessibility. The location of furnishings associated with outdoor seating in common open spaces and pedestrian walkways presents safety and accessibility issues regarding pedestrian access, persons with disabilities, emergency services, and natural disasters. Lack of regulation of outdoor seating could lead to violation of federal and state accessibility laws, property damage and personal injury. (3) Nuisances. The intent of the ordinance is to regulate the activities taking place within outdoor seating areas so there will be no interference with the enjoyment and use of property. The proposed ordinance includes provisions for maintaining areas in a clean and safe condition at all times and prohibiting encroachment upon other tenant spaces without their consent. At its July 17, 1997 meeting, the City Council had several concerns regarding outdoor seating, including limits of administrative approval, color compatibility, and encroachment into adjacent tenant space. Staff has revised the ordinance to address these concerns. The proposed ordinance would require outdoor seating in which food and/or beverage are served (waiter service) to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission/Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee and City Council by site plan approval or Planned Unit Development amendment. Outdoor seating without waiter service and enlargements to previously approved 2 outdoor seating areas may be administratively approved by the Growth Management Director or her designee. Specific standards and limitations are also proposed to be placed on outdoor seating areas. Those are: Outdoor seating must be arranged to allow not less than six (6) feet adjacent to every seat and table. Six (6) feet must be left for all passageways. Outdoor seating shall not encroach on any sidewalk, passageway or other property of any other person or business unless the petitioner receives written consent of the other person or business and is administratively approved by the City. Outdoor seating shall not occupy any area designated for parking. Outdoor seating areas shall be separated from other areas by fencing, planter boxes or other approved divider. Outdoor seating shall be compatible in color and style with the exterior of the building and shall not contain any sign, lettering or advertising. However, menu boards are allowed and regulated in the draft ordinance. Food and beverage service in an outdoor seating area would be prohibited between 10 p.m. and 7 am. from Sunday through Thursday and between 11 p.m. and 7 a.m. Friday through Saturday. No music or other performances of any kind, live or recorded, are permitted with any outdoor seating area. Outdoor seating which increases the total number of seats of an establishment shall provide additional parking to meet the need created by the additional seats. Outdoor seating which does not increase the total number of seats available for an establishment will not be required to provide any additional parking spaces. Proposed and existing, but unapproved, outdoor seating areas would have to conform with the standards and limitations in the code. 3 February 26, 1998 ORDINANCE 5, 1998 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF SECTION 78 -2 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, ENTITLED "DEFINITIONS ", BY AMENDING THE DEFINITION OF "RESTAURANT" AND BY ADDING A DEFINITION OF "OUTDOOR SEATING "; PROVIDING FOR ENACTMENT OF SECTION 110-44 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, ENTITLED "MENU BOARDS "; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT OF SECTION 118-44 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, ENTITLED "ADMINISTRATIVE AMEND- MENTS TO APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLANS ", BY ADDING A PROVISION CONCERNING "OUTDOOR SEATING "; PROVIDING FOR ENACTMENT OF SECTION 118 -311 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, ENTITLED "OUTDOOR SEATING "; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF CONFLICTING ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Code of Ordinances of the City of Palm Beach Gardens presently does not contain any provisions regulating the manner in which outdoor seating may be provided and utilized by restaurants, hotels, and other businesses within the City; WHEREAS, the manner in which outdoor seating is provided and utilized generally affects the health, safety, and welfare of residents of the City and specifically affects the health, safety, and welfare of patrons and customers of restaurants, hotels, and other businesses within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare of City residents and others who patronize the restaurants, hotels, and other businesses within the City by regulating the manner in which outdoor seating may be provided and utilized. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: SECTION 1. Section 78 -2 of the City's Code of Ordinances, entitled "Definitions ", is hereby amended by amending or inserting, in alphabetical order, the following terms and definitions (added words underlined; deleted words str udr -0: Outdoorseatino means the chairs. stools. benches. and otherfumishinas which are desianed primarily for a person to sit upon. located outside the walls of a building in which a restaurant. lounae. hotel. or other commercial business. establishment. or institution is being operated. and includes all other furnishinas similarlv located for use in coniunction with such seatina. such as tables. umbrellas. menu boards. service carts, and decorative items. Restaurant means an establishment where food is ordered from a menu, prepared and served for pay primarily for consumption on the premises in a completely enclosed room, under the roof of the main structure. or at outdoor seating immediately adjacent to the main structure or in an interior court surrounded on all four sides by the main structure. An establishment where food is prepared or served for pay, but not primarily for con- sumption on the premises, including a drive -in facility felt as defined in this section, is not a restaurant. A cafeteria shall be deemed a restaurant. SECTION 2. Section 110-44 of the City's Code of Ordinances is hereby enacted, as follows: Sec. 110 -44. Menu boards. (a) A menu board is a removable sign used to inform the public of the list of dishes or foods available in a restaurant along with the corresponding prices, and may include other information about the restaurant such as its telephone number, hours of operation, and acceptance of credit cards. Ordinance 5, 1998 Page 2 (b) A menu board must be constructed of durable material, such as wood, metal, or plastic, and may not be constructed of paper, cardboard, pressboard, or similar material. (c) A menu board may have one face, or may have two faces of identical size, and may be constructed as a sign mounted on a pole or as a sandwich -board type sign. (d) A menu board shall not be more than five feet high, measured from the ground, and shall not be more than three feet wide (e) A menu board must be stored within the restaurant using it whenever the restaurant is closed to the public. (f) One menu board may be displayed by a restaurant which has outdoor seating, unless the restaurant has two or more outdoor seating areas which are separated by a wall at least six feet high or which are otherwise not visible from each other, in which case one menu board may be utilized or displayed in each separate outdoor seating area of the restaurant. SECTION 3. Section 118-44 of the City's Code of Ordinances is hereby amended, as follows (added words underlined; deleted words ztr uck* Sec. 118 -44. Administrative amendments to approved development plans. Under this article, minor amendments to approved development plans may be approved by the Growth Management Director in consultation with other city staff, as appropriate. The following types of amendments shall not be considered minor and shall require formal review by the Planning and Zoning Commission /Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee and /or City Council as required for development approval in this chapter. Ordinance 5, 1998 Page 3 (13) Anv amendment which would create or add outdoor seatina that involves the service of food or beveraaes of anv kind within the outdoor seatina area. enlarae the area for such outdoor seatina by more than five percent of the outdoor seatina area. or materialiv alter the character of such qutdoor seatina. $F,GTION 4. Section 118 -311 of the City's Code of Ordinances is hereby enacted, as follows: Section 118 -311. Outdoor seating. (1) Applicability. Outdoor seating shall be permitted as an accessory use to a building in which a restaurant, lounge, hotel, or other commercial business, establishment, or institution is operated, provided that: (a) The outdoor seating area is immediately adjacent and contiguous to, and has direct access through a doorway to, that portion of the restaurant, lounge, hotel, or other commercial business, establishment or institution which is inside the building; (b) The outdoor seating is located on property which is either owned or leased by the adjacent restaurant, lounge, hotel, or other commercial business, establishment or institution; (c) The outdoor seating can be accomodated without impeding the access of the general public, including persons with disabilities, to the portion of the restaurant, lounge, hotel, or other commercial business, establishment or institution which is located inside the building, or to any other commercial business or other use within the same building; and Ordinance 5, 1998 Page 4 (d) The outdoor seating can be accomodated without creating a need for additional parking spaces which could not be provided on the same site as the building for which the outdoor seating would be an accessory use or would create a non - conforming status for existing parking provided for such building. (2) Permitting process. An applicant for approval of outdoor seating. may include the proposed outdoor seating as part of an overall application for a development order, or may seek amendment of an existing development order to allow for outdoor seating, pursuant to the applicable provisions of this Code. Every application involving outdoor seating shall include the following, in addition to and not in place of anything else which may otherwise be required by any other provision of this Code: (a) A list of the names and addresses of every other occupant of the same building and every other owner and tenant of property within 500 feet of the property for which outdoor seating is proposed, together with certification that a notice was mailed to each such occupant or owner stating that the applicant has requested approval by the City for outdoor seating. (b) A site plan, drawn to scale, which shows at least the building for which outdoor seating will be an accessory use, the location of the restaurant, lounge, hotel, or other commercial business, establishment or institution which will use the outdoor seating, the location of the outdoor seating and all related fencing, screening, or dividing materials, the location of any sidewalks or other pedestrian walkways or passageways which are adjacent to or will be affected by the outdoor seating, and the location of all existing or additional parking for such building. Ordinance 5, 1998 Page 5 (c) A copy of the written consent of any person or business who owns or leases any property, including any sidewalk or other public passageway, which would be encroached upon by the outdoor seating, which consent shall include indemnification of the City for any liability for personal injury and property damage due to the approval or existence of the outdoor seating. (d) Photographs, renderings, or samples showing the style and color of all furnishings, menu boards, and fencing, screening, or dividing material to be used for or in conjunction with the outdoor seating. (3) Conditions of outdoor seating. Outdoor seating shall comply at all times with the following conditions: (a) Outdoor seating shall be arranged, when in use, in a manner that allows a pedestrian walkway of not less than 6 feet in width adjacent to every seat and table. (b) Outdoor seating located on a pedestrian walkway which provides access to more than one occupant of a building, as in a shopping center, shall be arranged, when in use, in a manner that maintains a straight passage of not less than 6 feet in width immediately adjacent to, but not through, the outdoor seating area. (c) Outdoor seating shall not encroach upon any sidewalk, passageway, or other property of any other person or business ent- e rso o business and_is -adm nLlcatiyely .pWove_d_ lay- �it . (d) Outdoor seating shall not occupy any area designated for parking. Ordinance 5, 1998 Page 6 (e) Outdoor seating which is not within an inner court, and which is used for the service of food or beverages of any kind within the outdoor seating area, shall be physically separated and visually distinct from any immediately adjacent public passageway or walkway by means of approved fencing or screening material which is not less than 3 feet in height, by means of one or more planter boxes and other plant containers, by means of some other approved divider, or by any combination of such means, but not including tables, chairs, or other seating. (f) Outdoor seating shall be compatible in color and style with the exterior of the building and shall not contain or have affixed to it any sign, lettering, or advertising of any kind, except for menu boards and' small labels permanently affixed to the furnishings in order to identify ownership for security purposes. (g) Outdoor seating shall be stored whenever the restaurant, lounge, hotel, or other commercial business, establishment or institution using it is closed to the public. (4) Limitations on use. Except for outdoor seating located in an inner court: (a) All sales and service of food and beverages in an outdoor seating area are prohibited between 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. from Sunday through Thursday, and between 11:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. from Friday through Saturday. (b) No music or other performances of any kind, live or recorded, shall be permitted within any outdoor seating area. (5) Parking requirements. Outdoor seating which increases the total number of seats available at a restaurant, lounge, hotel, or other commercial business for the service of food or beverages of any kind shall be considered an expansion of use which Ordinance 5, 1998 Page 7 requires additional parking, and such outdoor seating shall be included in any calculation of the total number of seats provided by the restaurant, lounge, hotel, or other commercial business. SECTION 5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to ensure that the contents of this ordinance be codified as part of the City Code of Ordinances. $EQTIQN 6. Should any section or provision of this ordinance, or any portion, paragraph, sentence, or word thereof, be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such declaration shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, but only that part declared to be invalid. $EGTIQN 7. All ordinances and resolutions of the City, or any part thereof, which are in conflict with this ordinance are hereby repealed. $EGTION $. This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after it is adopted. PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS DAY OF MARCH, 1998. PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS DAY OF, 1998. PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF, 1998. JOSEPH R. RUSSO, MAYOR LINDA MONROE, COUNCIL MEMBER LAUREN FURTADO, VICE MAYOR ERIC JABLIN, COUNCIL MEMBER ATTEST: LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK Ordinance 5, 1998 Page 8 DAVID CLARK, COUNCIL MEMBER APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND SUFFICIENCY: BY: CITY ATTORNEY VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR FURTADO COUNCIL MEMBER MONROE COUNCIL MEMBER JABLIN COUNCIL MEMBER CLARK P: \CP \HI STORY\1090\39. DOC (319.059) Ordinance 5, 1998 Page 9 Mp,r- 05-98 07 :29A Professional Engineer: Professional Land Surveyor: EDUCATTON CURRICULUM VITAE ARNOLD RAMOS, P.E., Y.L.S. Florida Registration Number: 8031 Mississippi Registration No.: 8456 Florida Registration Number: 1975 Bachelor of Science - Civil Engineering Major in Sanitary, Environmental and Highway Engineering University of Florida, 1960 PRESENT AFFILIATTONS • Member, Florida Engineering Society. _ • Member, Florida Society of Professional Land Surveyors • Member, National Society of Professional Engineers • Board of Supervisors, Old Plantation Water Control District PAST AFFILIATIONS • President, Fort Lauderdale/Broward County Chamber of Commerce • Board of Directors, Landmark Bank of West Broward • Honorary Trustee, Broward Community College • Board of Directors, Hospice Care of Broward • Broward Central Examining Board of Engineering Construction Trades • District Engineer, Plantation Acres Tmprovement District • Advisory Board, American Automobile Association • Advisory Board, Leadership Broward • Metropolitan Planning Organization (T.C.C.) Mt HVEVEMENT$ Selected as "Young Engineer," Florida Engineering Society, 1969 Selected as one of the "Five Outstanding Young Men of Fort Lauderdale," by the Fort Lauderdale Jaycees, 1971. F.02 ffy,�J 6 L,F OF-7 Maur- O,• -98 07 :29A Arnold Ramos, P.E., P.L.S. Page Two PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 1983 to Present Keith and Schnars, P.A. Executive Vice President: A multi- disciplined firm offering professional services in the fields of engineering, planning and surveying. The firm serves a broad range of clients including municipal, county, state and federal agencies, as well as private and public corporations, and possesses expertise in civil, environmental, geotechnical, structural and traffic engineering -o well as construction supervision. Corporate offices are located in Fort Lauderdale, Lakeland, Miami, Stuart, Fort Myers, Jacksonville and Orlando. 1978 to 1983 Mid South Engineering Company President and Chairman of the Board: A consulting firm with expertise in several engineering related work areas, particularly highway design, traffic engineering, structures, planning, surveying and construction supervision. Provided active input in "the complex engineeringprojects; —also pr `vide -d the necessary governmental coordination activities for projects during review and approval phases, as well as expert witness testimony for various transportation and land use cases. Made frequent appearances on television and radio, as well as before concerned citizens groups, Chambers of Commerce, and county and city groups to discuss transportation needs. 1973 to 1977 Gulrstream Land & Development Corporation Executive Vice President: Responsible for all engineering and construction of highway systems, water and sewer facilities, utilities and environmental studies for four new communities in Florida, totaling 21,000 acres. Also was responsible for all state and county approvals of Developments of Regional Impact and the general operations of the communities. 1968 to 1973 Florida Department of Transportation, District IV District Engineer: Responsible for overall management, coonlination and budgeting of transportation needs and facilities for the nine - county Southeast Florida area. Conducted planning and design public hearings relative to environmental impact studies for various improvements and their subsequent review and approval by federal transportation and environmental agencies. P -03 Mar.- 0,5 - 98 07 9A _. P.04 . ,.. Arnold Ramos, P.E., P.L.S. Page Three 1%6to1 Florida Department of Transportation Stai�e Construction Engineer: Responsible for overall construction programs for the State of Florida; efficiency of construction operations, meeting deadlines, working with contractors, adv}aing Districts in overall procedures, and assisting in problem areas. 1964 to 1965 Florida Department of Transportation, District U Assistant District Construction Engineer: Supervised the sixteen -county area comprising the Second District, including a $25.000.000 Bond Program in Tallahassee. 1960 to 1962 Participated in the Florida Department of Transportation In- Service Training Program on all phases of transportation. PETITIONER'S E?MIBIT LIST NORTHMIL PLAZA 1. Application for Certificate of Concurrency Reservation under cover letter from Urban Design Studio to Bristol Ellington dated July 2, 1996 and attached materials. 2. Application for Site Plan Review and attached materials dated January 24, 1997. 3. Letter, from Urban Design Studio to Mr. Marty Minor dated March 7, 1997. 4. Memo from Urban Design Studio to Ed Tombari dated March 18, 1997. 5. Memorandum from Edward Tombari, City Planner, to Hank Skokowski, Urban Design Studio dated March 31, 1997. 6. Letter from Lawrence W. Smith of Gary, Dytrych & Ryan, P.A. to David A. Acton, Esq. dated April 21, 1997. 7. Memorandum Staff Report from Planning and Zoning Staff to Site Plan Review and Appearance Committee dated June 19, 1997 (for meeting dated June 24, 1997). 8. Interoffice Memorandum from Jack Hanson, Building Official to Ed Tombari, City Planner dated July 10, 1997. 9. Memorandum and Staff Report from Planning and Zoning Staff to Site Plan Review and Appearance Review Committee dated July 17, 1997 (for meeting dated July 22, 1997). 10. Letter dated July 25, 1997 from Urban Design Studio to Mr. Edward Tombari. 11. Memorandum and Staff Report dated August 7, 1997 from Planning and Zoning Staff to Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee (for meeting dated August 12, 1997). 12. Letter from Urban Design Studio to Ed Tombari, City Planner dated and received by the City of Palm Beach Gardens August 20, 1997 responding to Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee comments from August 12, 1997 workshop. 13. Memorandum and Staff Report from Planning and Zoning Staff to Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee dated August 28, 1997 (for September 2, 1997 meeting). 14. Memorandum from Ed Tombari, City Planner to Hank Skokowski, Urban Design Studio dated September 4, 1997. 15. Interoffice Memorandum from Bobbie Herakovich, City Manager to Mayor and Council re: resident concerns re: NorthMil Plaza dated September 12, 1997. 16. Letter from Marty R. A. Minor, AICP, City of Palm Beach Gardens, to Mr. Hank Skokowski, AICP dated September 23, 1997. 17. Memorandum from David A. Acton, Esq. to Bobbie Herakovich, City Manager, dated September 24, 1997. 18. Letter from Urban Design Studio to Bobbie Herakovich, City Manager dated October 1, 1997 re: NorthMil Plaza - Response to Your Interoffice Memo Dated 9/12/97. 19. Memorandum from Kimley -Horn and Associates, Rocky Biby to Mr. Marty Minor /Miss Tammy Jacobs dated October 2, 1997. 20. Letter from Gary, Dytrych & Ryan, P.A., Lawrence W. Smith to David A. Acton, Esq. dated October 8, 1997 re: NorthMil Plaza - Holland School - Liquor Store Issue - Revised Plans. 21. Letter from Gary, Dytrych & Ryan, Lawrence W. Smith to Marty Minor dated October 8, 1997 re: NorthMil Plaza - Holland School /Liquor Store Issue - Revised Plans. 22. Letter from Urban Design Studio to Mr. Marty Minor re: NorthMil Plaza dated October 10, 1997. 23. Letter of Transmittal dated October 13, 1997 to Tammy Jacobs from Edward Tombari. 24. Memorandum from Henry Skokowski, Urban Design Studio dated October 14, 1997 re: NorthMil Plaza City Council Workshop Meeting. 25. Memorandum to Marty Minor from Tammy Jacobs dated October 23, 1997, Subject: NorthMil Plaza. 26. City of Palm Beach Gardens City Council Agenda Cover Memorandum (Staff .Report) dated November 20, 1997 re: Workshop: Petition SP -97 -01 for November 20, 1997 City Council Meeting). 27. Letter from Gary, Dytrych & Ryan, Lawrence W. Smith, to Bobbie Herakovich, City Manager dated November 20, 1997. 28. Memorandum from City of Palm Beach Gardens, Edward Tombari, City Planner, to Hank Skokowski, Urban Design dated December 2, 1997 and attached Memorandum to file from Mark Hendrickson, City Forester, Subject SP- 97 -01, NorthMil Plaza dated December 2, 1997. 29. Memorandum to Hank Skokowski, President, Urban Design Studio from Roscoe L. Biby, P.E. dated December 3, 1997 re: NorthMil Plaza. 30. Letter from Urban Design Studio, Hank Skokowski, to Ms. Roxanne Manning, Growth Management Director dated December 3, 1997 re: NorthMil Plaza. 31. Letter from Urban Design Studio, Henry Skokowski, AICP, to Mr. Edward Tombari, City Planner, dated December 8, 1997 re: NorthMil Plaza. 32. Memorandum from City of Palm Beach Gardens, Edward Tombari, City Planner to Hank Skokowski, Urban Design Studio, dated December 9, 1997 re: SP- 97 -01: NorthMil Plaza. 33. Letter from Urban Design Studio, Henry Skokowski, AICP, to Mr. Edward. Tombari, City Planner, dated December 12, 1997 re: NorthMil Plaza. 34. Letter from Gary, Dytrych & Ryan, Lawrence W. Smith, to Ms. Bobbie Herakovich, City Manager, dated December 17, 1997 re: NorthMil Plaza - Scheduling. 35. Memorandum from Tammy Jacobs to Marty Minor dated December 17, 1997, subject: NorthMil Plaza. 36. Interoffice Memorandum from Sergeant Jay Spencer to Ed Tombari, Planner dated December 22, 1997, Subject: NorthMil Plaza. 37. Letter from Urban Design Studio, Henry Skokowski, AICP, to Mr. Edward Tombari, City Planner, dated December 22, 1997 re: NorthMil Plaza. 38. Letter from City of Palm Beach Gardens, Roxanne M.. Manning, AICP, to Mr. Lawrence W. Smith, dated December 23, 1997 re: NorthMil Plaza - Scheduling. 39. Letter from City of Palm Beach Gardens, Edward Tombari, City Planner to L. Fernando Levi, Project Engineer, Levi Engineering Corporation dated December 28, 1997. 40. Letter from Gary, Dytrych & Ryan, Lawrence W. Smith, to Ed Tombari dated January 7, 1998. 41. January 6, 1998 Site Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 sheet. 42. January 6, 1998 Landscape Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet. 43. December 12, 1997 Detail Sheet, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet. 44. January 6, 1998 Landscape Details, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet. 45. July 3, 1997 Military Trail Landscape Plan, Urban Design Studio, l Sheet. 46. October 9, 1997 Architectural Elevations, Ted Davis and Associates, Sheet A -1. 47. August 19, 1997 Architectural Elevations, Ted Davis and Associates, Sheet A -2. 48. January 6, 1998 Architectural Elevations, Ted Davis and Associates, Sheet A -3. 49. January 27, 1997 Architectural Elevations, Ted Davis and Associates, Sheets A -4 and A -5 and A -6. (Sheets A -5 and A -6 dated January 24, 1997). 50. October 9, 1997 Sign Details, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet. 51. December 12, 1997 Lighting Plan and Notes, Urban Design Studio, 2 Sheets. 52. December 21, 1997 Conceptual Drainage Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet. 53. Preliminary Official Zoning Map, City of Palm Beach Gardens, dated February 1967. 2 Sheets. 54. Ordinance 28, 1978 of the City of Palm Beach Gardens. 1 Sheet. 55. Memo from Sergeant Jay Spencer to Edward Tombari dated December 22, 1997 re: NorthMil Plaza Cross Walk and accompanying fax sheet from Ed Tombari to Hank /Anne dated 1/7/98. 56. Letter from Urban Design Studio to Edward Tombari dated January 6, 1998. 57. Noise Survey Report from Levi Engineering Corp. to Mr. Edward Tombari dated January 13, 1998 together with fax cover sheet from Levi Engineering corp. dated January 13, 1998. 58. Letter dated January 20, 1998 from Dunn & Associates, Stanley E. Dunn, to Roxanne Manning re: NorthMil Plaza Noise Assessment. 59. Letter dated January 19, 1998 from Frank Mowitz of Albertsons, to Roxanne Manning. 60. Letter from Marty R.A. Minor to Concerned Residents dated January 21, 1998. 61. Agenda Cover Memorandum (Staff Report) dated February 5, 1998, Subject /Agenda Item: Considerations of Approval: Petition SP- 97-01 by Henry Skokowski. 62. Draft of Resolution 2, 1998, City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. 63. Letter from Lawrence W. Smith to Marty Minor dated February 5, 1998. 64. Composite Exhibit Urban Design Studio Colored Boards and Drawings (Items 1 through 7) 65. September 26, 1996 Memorandum from Lynnette Lanning to Richard Walton 66. September 3, 1996 letter from Kahart Pinder, David Plummer & Associates to Lynnette Lanning, Lindahl, Browning 67. August 2, 1996 letter from Kahart M. Pinder, AICP of David Plummer & Associates, Inc. to Ms. Lynnette Lanning, Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari, et al 68. August 29, 1996 letter from Kahart M. Pinder, AICP of David Plummer & Associates, Inc. to Ms. Lynnette Lanning, Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari, et al 69. September 18, 1996 Memo from Anne Booth of Urban Design Studio to Bahara Keshevarz 70. October 3, 1996 letter from Henry Skokowski, AICP of Urban Design Studio to Ms. Bahara Keshevarz of The City of Palm Beach Gardens 71. October 3, 1996 letter from Andrew S. Hertel, AICP of Palm Beach County Dept. of Engineering and Public Works to Anne Booth of Urban Design Studio 72. May 2, 1996 letter from Department of Transportation to Mr. Joseph Pollock, P.E. of Kimley -Horn Associates, Inc. 73. October 30, 1996 Memorandum from Ed Tombari, City Planner, City of Palm Beach Gardens to Henry Skokowski, Urban Design Studio 74. January 29, 1997 Memorandum from Sergeant Jay Spencer to Edward Tombari, City Planner, City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 75. February 10, 1997 Memorandum from Linda Mazziotti of Lindahl, Browning to Richard Walton 76. Palm Beach Gardens Police Department Crime Prevention Unit Matrix Charge 77. August 28, 1997 Memorandum from Tammy Jacobs, Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari & Hellstrom to Marty Minor of the City of Palm Beach Gardens 78. June 18, 1997 Memorandum from Tammy Jacobs, Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari & Hellstrom to Kim Glas 79. August 14, 1997 Fax Transmission Memo from Ed Tombari, City of Palm Beach Gardens, to Tammy Jacobs, Lindahl, Ferrari 80. October 14, 1997 Memorandum from Sergeant Jay Spencer to Edward Tombari, City Planner, City of Palm Beach Gardens 81. August 20, 1997 letter from Henry Skokowski, AICP, Urban Design Studio to Mr. Edward Tombari, City Planner, The City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 82. October 29, 1997 Memorandum from Henry Skokowski, Urban Design Studio to Andrew Brock, Peter Brock, Frank Mowitz, Rocky Biby, John Preston, Yvonne Ziel, Garren Owens, Sandra Parks and Greg Johnson 83. November 5, 1997 Memorandum from Rocky Biby, Kimley -Horn to Hank Skokowski, Urban Design Studio 84. December 9, 1997 letter from Edward Tombari, City Planner, City of Palm Beach Gardens to Hank Skokowski, Urban Design Studio 85. December 12, 1997 Memorandum from Sergeant Jay Spencer, Palm Beach Gardens Police Department to Ed Tombari, City of Palm Beach Gardens 86. December 18, 1997 Memorandum from Byron Pepitone, Code Enforcement Supervisor, City of Palm Beach Gardens, to Roxanne Manning, Growth Management Director, City of Palm Beach Gardens 87. December 23, 1997 letter from Henry Skokowski, AICP, Urban Design Studio to Mr. Edward Tombari, City Planner, City of Palm Beach Gardens 88. January 6, 1998 letter from Henry Skokowski, AICP, Urban Design Studio to Mr. Edward Tombari, City Planner, City of Palm Beach Gardens 89. January 7, 1998 fax from Ed Tombari, City of Palm Beach Gardens to Hank Skokowski /Anne Booth, Urban Design Studio 90. December 29, 1997 Memorandum from Sergeant Jay Spencer, Palm Beach Gardens Police Department to Edward Tombari, City Planner, City of Palm Beach Gardens 91. January 6, 1998 Memorandum from Tammy Jacobs, Lindahl, Browning to Marty Minor, City of Palm Beach Gardens 92. Traffic Impact Analysis - Northlake Commons prepared for Northlake Partners by Yvonne Ziel Traffic Consultants, Inc. 93. February 19, 1998 Agenda Cover Memorandum (staff report) re: NorthMil Plaza and attached proposed Resolution 21 1998 94. NorthMil.Plaza Sign Relocation dated February 11, 1998, Ref. No. 16124.14 95. Letter from Henry Skokowski to Roxanne Manning dated February 12, 1998 and attached Sign Relocation Plan 96. Memorandum from Roxanne Manning to Bobbie Herakovich, City Manager and City Council Members dated February 13, 1998 2104c LINDAHL, BROWNING, FERRARI & HELLSTROP0. INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS. PLANNERS & SUR%ENORS MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Walton FROM: Lynnette Lanning `x,�4b, Coro DATE: September 26, 1996 SUBJECT: Northlake Commons Shopping Center Concurrency � #96 =2)04 ) We have reviewed the application for Concurrency Certification for the referenced project. We offer the following comments: 1. Conditional Drainage Concurrency. The applicant has submitted a signed and sealed Drainage Statement, prepared by Roscoe L. Biby, P.E. which states that "legal positive outfall will be controlled using a weir/bleeder system which will connect to the existing inlet located at the northeast corner of the site ". Also, water quality and attenuation will be provided by an on -site wet detention area and subsurface exfiltration trenches designed in accordance with SFWMD Best Management Practices and the City of Palm Beach Gardens regulations. However, it is not determined whether the proposed outfall system can meet the City's performance standards. Therefore, conditional concurrency is satisfied subject to detailed design and possible outfall improvements. 2. SUA Concurrency - Satisfied. The applicant has submitted a letter from Seacoast Utility Authority, dated June 28, 1996, signed by Rim Bishop, stating that the referenced project lies within the water and sewer service of the SUA and that water and. sewer capacity is available as of the date of the letter. Therefore, water and sewer concurrency has been established. 3. Traffic Concurrency - Not Satisfied. The applicant has submitted a revised Traffic Impact Analysis, dated August 30, 1996, prepared by Yvonne Ziel Traffic Consultants, Inc. Kahart Pinder has reviewed the T.I.A. and recommends approval on the following conditions in his September 3, 1996 letter: 1. A westbound right turn lane on Northlake Boulevard at the Project's entrance. 2. A northbound right turn lane and a southbound left turn lane on Military Trail at the Project's entrance. EXHIBIT 3. A buildout date no later than December 31, 1998. POST OFFICE BOX 727, JUPITER, FL 33468 -0727 210 JUPITER LAKES BOULEVARD, BUILDING 5000, SUITE 104 (561) 746 -9248 FAX:(561) 746 -0272 WEST PALM BEACH JUPITER STUART FORT PIERCE OKEECHOBEE �y. �J Northlake Commons Page 2 4. However, we recommend that concurrency not be established until the applicant can demonstrate that the first two (2) items listed above can be approved by Palm Beach County (No. 1) and the Department of Transportation (No. 2). SWA Concurrency - Satisfied. The Solid Waste Authority has issued a letter, dated January 25, 1996, signed by Marc C. Brunner, Director of Planning & Environmental Programs, stating that capacity is available for the coming year and through the year 2021. Therefore, solid waste concurrency has been established. Enclosure LML /db cc: Bobbie Herakovich Jack Hanson Kahart Pinder DAVID PLUMMER &ASSOCIATES, INC. f�` ••t�O1 TRANSPORTATION - CNIL - STRUCTURAL - ENVIRONMENTAL September 3, 1996 RECEIVED SEP 0 9 1996 Ms. Lynette L?nning Lindahl. Erorming, Ferrari Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari et. al. s Hellstrom. Inc. 210 Jupiter Lakes Boulevard. Building 5000, Suite 104 Jupiter, FL 33468 Re: Northlake Commons - #96872.01 Dear Ms. Lanning: On September 3, 1996, we received a revised report dated August 30, 1996, for the above refergnced project. This current report has addressed all of our previous comments. After a review of the revised traffic report we have one additional comment. Page 13 of the report states that there are no Test 2 deficient roadways within the project's impact area and that the project does not have a 3% impact on any linlm— Northlake Boulevard from I -95 to MacArthur Boulevard and Military Trail from PGA Boulevard to Northlake Boulevard are both Test 2 deficiencies. The project does not have a 3% impact on any Test 2 deficient links. However, the directly accessed link of Military Tram from Holly Drive to Northlake Boulevard is a Test 2 deficient link. Section 15. (1) D.2(B)2 of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code (ULDC) provides that a single project may use up to three -fifths (3/5) of 5% of the Test 2 LOS "D" service volume. Therefore, the maximum daily volume available for Northlake Commons on Military Trail from Holly Drive to Northlake Boulevard is 1,464. The project is utilizing 1,310 daily trips and therefore meets the Test 2 requirements. The County has confirmed that these trips are available. The project can be approved with the following conditions: 1. A westbound right turn lane on Northlake Boulevard at the Project's entrance. 2. A northbound right turn lane and a southbound left turn lane on Military Trail at the Project's entrance. 3. A buildout date no later than December 31, 1998. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact this office.. 1 PALM BEACH, CORAL GABLES, FORT MYERS 001 NORTHPOINT PARKWAY, SLPTE 108, WEST PALM BEACH. FLORIDA 33407 TELEPHONE: 407 686-1100. FAX. 407 086-9970 EXHIBIT EXrFFn"G EXPECWI0r4 le DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. 'SANS ?C3Tgf'Cpi C Vlt L --ZL C -'-,At .`•ti "iC .. [ August 2, 1996 Ms. Lynnette Lanning Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari et. al. 210 Jupiter Lakes Boulevard Building 5000, Suite 104 Jupiter, FL 33468 Re: Northlake Commons - #96872.01 Dear Ms. Lanning: EXHIBIT I �7 RECEIVED AU-4 0 6 1996 Lindahl. Browning, Forrad & hallstrom, Inc. We have completed our review of the Traffic Impact Analysis (dated Revised June 25, 1996) for the above referenced project. This report was submitted to the City on July 2, 1996. At this time we have the following comments: • The peak hour Internal/External trips need to be balanced. • The Pass -by rate for a Fast Food Restaurant is 30% not 45%. • The volumes shown for the link of Northlake Boulevard east of McArthur Boulevard are not the same in Figure 3 and Table 7. Please correct this discrepancy. • Tables 7 and 8 have not been included in the report. • The Growth Rate Calculations for Northlake Boulevard should be calculated for 1993 -1995. • The background growth rates for the intersections need to be documented. The Northlake Boulevard /Military Trail growth rate appears high and the Northlake Boulevard/I -95 interchange appears low. • The Project, as proposed, generates in excess of 1,000 daily trips. Therefore, a determination by Palm Beach County that the project is in compliance with the Countywide Traffic Performance Standards is required. The above issues need to be addressed and agreed upon before a determination can be made if the project meets the City's Traffic Performance Standards. Do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions. Very y ogr`s,,- /Kahart M. Pinder, AICP KMP /ms PAlrn MAC'1. C - :NAl GABLES. FOBI anYE ?; YCE = ^ING 001 NCRfHrY�:rl' IMKEVAY. SUIT, IOd. �, %Ea'A;,,% ?EACH. Ff'_ %r:; i.. ,.. FF � _'E ^IT fElc HCriE SOi ��.� 1. ?t`U.:AX :IO /.nao ?:,.;^ c:(FE --- AFCNS _. _.._ 497- 746 -0272 I .BF&H JUPITER " 665 P03 ? 04 '96 14 X50 DAVID PLUMMER & ASSOCIATES, INC. EXHIBIT loST3ANSP'CR:A?ICh . •ANC • S ?P.C'Ti,QN . CNMRCIN1q(NiAt - August 29, 1996 Ms. Lynnette Lansing Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari et. al. 210 Jupiter Ickes Boulevard Building 5000, Suite 104 Jupiter, FL 33468 Re: Northlake Commons - #96872.01 Dear Ms. Lanning: Over the past weeks, we have been working with the applicant's traffic consultant to develop applicable historic growth rates. I have also been coordinating with the County as to the applicable historic growth rates for roadway links and intersections. The following growth rates are recommended: Northlake Boulevard West Beeline Highway 17.63 Beeline Highway Haverhill Road 3.77 Haverhill Road Military Trail 10.27 Military Trail Site 3.57 Site I -95 3.57 I95 MacArthur Boulevard 0.28 MacArthur Boulevard East 3.86 All other links will be as shown in the fax of August 23, 1996. At this time, it is appropriate for the Traffic Impact Study to be revised to reflect these historic growth rates. This would include revised link analyses as well as intersection analyses. In addition, the following specific issues need to be addressed. • The AM peak hour internal trips need to be balanced. Also the numbers of trips seem high. Revise accordingly. • The project trip distribution should be as shown in the revised report dated 8/31/96. • The base year traffic count should be 1995 not 1996. balance of the report. o If you have any questions, please call. PA11N BEACH. CORFU CA LE S. FORI MYERS 00t NORMYOINT PARKWAY, SUUt 108. WE31 PAW UACM. f(CRIPA 33407 (EtEPHONE: 407 8861300, FAX. 407 0808!10 This will provide consistency with the RECENED �� ,"'.� Q�U• fro SEP 2 1996 c; "I "It ti liltda�tl, •�R �� .• &liens gym, 6st�., �- EUEEDINa COECiATONS . FROM URBAN DESIGN STUDIO VPBr� r�err�o TO: BAHARA KES RZ FROM: ANNE BOOTH DATE: SEPTEMBER 18, 1996 09,18 19961 EXHIBIT !J M 10 50 NO, 6 P, ` 1 u Vk ban �A i n �L s o + Urban Design Urban Planning Land Planning Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics RE: ISSUANCE OF CERTIFICATE OF CONCURRENCY RESERVATION FOR NORTHLAKE COMMONS . OUR REF. #16124.05 This memo is a follow up to our phone conversation regarding the status of the issuance of a Certificate of Concurrency Reservation for the Northlake Commons project. As per Lynnette's memorandum dated July 24th, this project has satisfied it's concurrency requirements with the exception of traffic which was under review by Kahart Pinder. On September 4th we submitted an amended traffic analysis in accordance with the review and comments of- Kahart Pinder. On September 6th, your office received a letter of approval from the County with regard to the amended traffic report. It is my understanding that you have spoken to Lynnette and that she is in the process of issuing a letter indicting that we have met our traffic Concurrency requirements. As we discussed, the applicant is anxious to proceed with the review of this project and would like to be scheduled for a DRC meeting in time to be heard at the October 8th Planning and Zoning Board meeting. Realizing how busy you are, please do not hesitate to let me know if there is anything that I can do to help you coordinate with Lynnette regarding the processing of this application. Thank you for alllQf.your help. cc: Lynnette Laaning Northlake Partners Tom Hamilton Charlie Ring Rick Warner Post-it, Fax Note 7671 Oats P- ,g2ss-► 66#5, From A K t 47�C f' Co./Dept Co. Pflone 8 _�•j d. d Phone N Fux N Fax N X WOMMON 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suits 600 The Concourse West Palm Beach, Florida 334094582 407.589.0088 407.689.0531 tax Stuart, Florida 407.283.0022 San Juan Capistrano, CA 714.489.8131 W Q`Z� _�•j d. d 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suits 600 The Concourse West Palm Beach, Florida 334094582 407.589.0088 407.689.0531 tax Stuart, Florida 407.283.0022 San Juan Capistrano, CA 714.489.8131 _ SEP -05 -1995 16:36 stet► .1 . Marcus Carol A. Roberts Warren K Newell Mary McCarty Maude Ford Lee PBC TRAFFIC - a� x TELECOPIER TRANSMITTAL COYER SHEET TRAFFIC DIVISION FAX NUMBER: [4071 478 -770 TRANSMITTAL DATE: Ot 15 /q b PLEASE DELIVER THE FOLLOWING TELECOPIEO MATERIAL T0: RECEIVER'S NAME:__ - LL�9L��N OFFICE NAME: p 6:2- p -21- 407°478 5770 P. 01!03 a Department of Engineering and Public Works OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER:__( -- ) - ' - - - -_ -- -L -. OFFICE FAX NU14BER: ( 1 7-7 ICJ I SUBJECT: A/d 7 M _t-/� h Cc,, .41 uiV SENDER'S NAME:- - �� f�C J E l5 r-� OFFICE TELEPHONE NUMBER: :: w# �►##### �fst###! ti*l ttt######## t!+* totttt!! t ! # # ### #o ###ii #t!#!t! # # # ##:�t : :a TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (including this transmittal cover sheet): PLEASE CALL TO VERIFY RECEIPT OF MAT L: YES ( I NO -t NAME OF FAX OPERATOR: rJ (���� _ 'An Equal Opperrtunity_• Affirmativc Aaiun Empl� »►K' cs a �n.�erewrp.a.. 110x212" Wcst Pt)m $ctcl% Florida 33416 -1229 (407) 6"40W cttiw o� I?.a.c. Sip 5 196 +PLANNING towMG �w SEP- 05= 1996:_16:37 PBC TRAFFIC Department of Engineering and Public Wbrht P.O. Box 21229 West Palm Leach, PL 55416-1229 (561) 684.4000 Palm Beach county board of cownty Commissioners Ken L. Foster, Chairman Butt Aaronson, Vice Chairman Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Roberts Warren H. Newell Mary McCarty Maude Ford Lee County Admi dotsator Robert Weisman. P.& "An EgW1OyP_ad*fy Ah -OlMd" Action amyropa- September 5, 1996 Mr. Rich Walton Planning and Zoning Department City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 334104698 RE: NORTHLAKE COMMONS Dear Mr. Walton: 407 478 5770. P.02iO3 c,�� 1596 The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic impact study for the project entitled Northlake Commons, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Section 15 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. The proposed uses of the project and the trips associated with those uses are shown below: Use Size Net Trips Fast Food Restaurant 3,500 sq. ft. 1,394 Drive in Bank 3,600 sq. ft. 464 General Retail 89,619 sq, ft. 3,580 Total 5,438 The project will generate 5,438 net daily trips. Please note that this trip generation is more than the 5,240 net trips shown in the traffic study. I have made this change because the internal, rates used in the traffic study is too high for daily traffic. This change does not change the results of the study because the rate used is reasonable for peak hour traffic, the key aspect of the study is peak hour traffic. The build -out is 1998, Because Military Trail from Northlake Boulevard to PGA Boulevard is identified as a Test 2 failure, Palm Beach County will reserve 1,310 trips for this project on this section of Military Trail. The Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. If you have any questions, please contact me at 684 -4030. Poo on mcw" , Post( -it►° -F(ax Note � �.(.�7671 Fro Date 9 — 1 _ct _ IPagges� Z ITo N \_IM From `P�- eA_..i. Co./Dept. Co. Phone # Phone # Fax # Fax # a I ^ SEP -05 19% -X15 37 PHC TRAF7F C 407 473 5770 Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Dan Weisberg, P.E. Senior Registered Civil Engineer cc. Kahart Pinder, Davis Plummer. & Assoc. Yvonne Ziel, Yvonne Ziel Traffic Consultants File: New - TPS - Traffic Study Review g: \user\dweisber\wp5Oltps \pbg23 45 13 ti4 TOTAL P.03 1 FROF URBAN DESItiN STUDIO WPB EXHIBIT 70 October 3, 1996 Ms. Bahara Keshevarz The City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 "'—"1311'996 1: 4$ N0, 5 . P. 1 RE: NOR.THLAKE COMMONS CONCURRENCY PETITION #PUD 96 -05 - OUR REF116124.05 Dear Bahara, Urban Design Urban Planning Land Planning Landscape Architecture Communication Craphies Please accept the attached documentation as our response to Item ^, Traffic Concurrency, in Lynnette Lannings September 26, 1996 memorandllm. 3. TrafFe Concurrency - Not Satisfied. The applicant has submitted a revised Traffic Impact Anglysis dated August 30, 1996, prepared by Yvonne 2iel Traffic Consultants, Inc. Kahart Pinder has reviewed the TIA and recommends approval on the following condition ; in his September 3, 1996 letter: 1. A westbound right turn lane on Northlake Boulevar.l at the Projects entrance. 2. A northbound right turn lane and a southbound left tur. i. lane on Military Trail at the Projects entrance. 3. A buildout date no later thAn December 31, 1998. However, we recommend that concurrency not be established until the applicant can demonstrate that the two (2) items listed above can be approved by Palm Beach County (No.1) a_ nd the Department of Transportation (No.2). Attached please find a letter dated October 3, 1996 from Andrew S. Hert►:l, AICP, Engineering Assistant III - Palm Beach County Traffic Division which indicates that the prop(.sed driveways are acceptable subject to: • C btgining a permit for construction. •L` esigr►;ng the pavement return for the eastern driveway so that it does not extend beyond the project's property line. The conveyance of 6 additional feet of right -of -way along Northlake. •The construction of a right turn lane (including the relocation of the sidewalk and utilities) between the 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard projects two entrances. Suite 600 The Concourse NWOMMON West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 -65F 407.689.0066 407.689.0551 fax Stuart, Florida 407.283.0022 San Juan Capistrano, CA 714.489.81' e -FROM URBAN DESIGN STUDIO WPB Ms. Bahara Keshavarz October 3, 1996 Page Two 19,03,1996 12;49 NO, 5 P. 2 The applicant has indicated that they are willing to meet the conditions of the County and we are prepared to Amend the PUD Master Site Plan accordingly. Also attached please find a copy of a letter from the Florida Department of TranGportation which approves a variance for the construction of the right turn and left turn lanes on Military Trail. In speaking with Lynette regarding the Military Trail turn lanes, she indicated that she would like to see the configuration of the left turn lane and understand if there would be any impact to the abutting residents to the north of the project. Attached` please find a sketch which was prepared by Kiml!ey -Horn which shows the configuration of the left turn lane. The proposed design can be accommodated within the existing right -of -way and will not require any additional dedications. There will be a shift of the existing curb within the right -of -way by approx;mately 1 foot along the frontage of the first lot north of the site. The existing sidewalk, however, will not be Affected. In that we have demonstrated that the turn lanes can be approved by Palm Beach County An d the Department of Transportation as requested by Lynnette, we therefore believe that we have satisfied the requirements of concurrency. We would appreciate the expedition of our concurrency approval and subsequently being scheduled for a DRC meeting as soon as possible in order to be heard by the Planning and Zoning Board at their October 22 meeting. Please let me or Anne know if you have any questions in regard to the attached. Thank you for your help. Sincerely, A .04, 1 00, Hefiry Skokowski, AICP Principal cc: Lynette Lanning Bobbie Herakovich Northlake Partners Tom Hamilton Charlie Ring Rick Warner Knh.w t Pinder NLCOMMON N O5 FROM URBAN DESIGN STUDIO WPB oepartmene of cngtneering and rublic Works P.O. BOX 21229 West Palm Beach. FL 33416.1224 (561) 684.4000 ■ Palm Beach County Board of County Comndssloners Ken L. Foster. Chair=% Burt Aaronson. vice Chauman Karen T. Marcus Carol A. Robers Warren H. Newell Mary Mccarty. Maude Ford Lee County Administrator Rabe -T Weisman. Y.E. 'An E7ua! pppornmiry A&marlve Amon Employer' prftod on re .-W pypar 19, 03,1996 "2149 NO.. S :.,P:,> 3 .... EXHIBIT October 3, 1996 Anne Booth Urban Design Studio The Concourse 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. Suite 600 West Palm Beach, FL 3409 SUBJECT: NORTHLAK9 COMMONS Dear Ms. Booth: This is to amend my letter of October 1, to you on this subject. The County's comments with regard to the two proposed right turn -in and out driveways to serve this project on Northlake Boulevard as follows: The locations of the proposed driveways are acceptable, subject to: o Obtaining . a .permit from the County to allow their construction o The pavement return for the eastern driveway is not to extend beyond the project's property line. o The Conveyance of 6 additional feet of right of way for Northlake Boulevard, across the project's frontage. o The construction of a right turn lane (including the relocation of the sidewalk and utilities) between the project's two driveways. Please note that it is the intent for the additional right of way ,to the west of the project's west driveway to be utilized by the County to accommodate part of the future.right turn lane to serve Military Trail. 0OP4 URBAN DESIGN STUDIO WPB ,'83;.1996 r_� 2, 59 ;N�, P,°4 October. 3, 1996 page 2 I hope that this information is of use to you. Please contact, me if you have any questions. Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER Andrew S. Hertel, AICP Engineering Assistant III.- Traffic Division . t; ASH:meo 1 pc: Charles R. Walker, P: E. - Director - Traffic Division Jim Peters - Land Development File: Roads - Northiake Boulevard } i ASHWake.com rOrAL. P.031 ,FROM -URBAN DESIGN STUDIO WPB FLORIDA L^VAV% CH1L" GOKMOR 10.03.1996 '2:58 N0, 5 P, 5 KlMLE1 -HORK , - - - EXHIBIT .-, DEPA OF ON •� Pennits Office , ♦at 3400 West Commercial Boulevard Fr. Lauderdale, Florida 33309 -3421 Telephone (954) 777 -4383 _ May 2, 1996 .::;rli•� -,.0 Mr. losech Pollock. P•E. Kimley -Horn =d associates, Inc. MAY n 6 1996 4431 Embareadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 Dear hit. Pollock: SubjNt: state Highway VeMcil!-ar Access Connection Permit State Section 93150, State Road $09, Access Class Interim, Connection Caugory E Posted Speed 35 m.p_h., Urban Section, In the City of P51m Brach Gardens Datr. nf Pro aapiiaatleDt Rrview March 21, 1996 Location: Military Trail between Northlake Blvd. and .Arbor Way Property Owner. Centrecorp Management Services Applicant: Ceatrecorp•Managernent Services Variance Request: A right -in, right-out, lob -in at a VAC directional median opening 570' nom of Northiake and 54& south of Arbor Way. The:minimum standard is 660'- 570'= 90' for a 1404 variance also a.660' - 54W =12W a I S% variance. The request is: Approved Distpprovcd (J Conditionally Approved( j Comments: AAPlrt•. 6,s 6•ee:.. Y^n rc . 4r 4' rG _iLv. V' T4i1IJJ:S+- � � 1. 1t Ej' +-vt.; t G •.s _ A'-Ir* 4*4' 1,:,, •�t��- i n CneN� �h[.c.�4 sns t"�'_ t..G� i13�L+1 �. . _ _ V ••� t _ A ruling by the Variance Commmittee only dei'ities the number and tyye of aces points and associated feauues.that may be ptrmltted and is not the final action in your VAC permit process. Committee approval or other favorable ruling generally means that the prope_'ty owner• may develop- plus complying with the riding and submit the a, within six monrhs, to the Department for permit processing. Depwancst permits personaol have the duties of checking the viabitity of the design plans In terms of standards compliance and comtructtbility and also of assuring that: the plans substantially comply with the engiaeering drawings approved'by the Committee. Committee approvals or rulings which arc at variance with Dcpat=erlt rules or standards are not binding in the permitting process far more than six momhs. Please submit a copy of this letuf with your permit application. lit DISTIU ` AIVUU iCE C0M!ViITFEE With the above g I: /J Agree Disagree Frank Gordon. zind _ O'[�11 `�_ May 2, 1996 District Design r ! %" William Lewis, P.E. Gf// - _ J May 2, 1496 District Traffic 0pei2 s 1 agiacer Sacbars Ray, P_E. AAC 1 x miry:!, 1996 A= sistant Diiwict atntenaace Enginder CDT, jma cc: Clark D. Turberville. P.E. Jonathan Overton, P.E. Alan Rothmanu Andy Vaillancourt .. _.. _. ....... -- ......ant.. -� -„ FRi1M` URM 6ESIGN STUDIO APB '`� 10,83.1996 251 :° N0, "p. • I 11 j ti Ijj II Il ! 11 I 11 �. •- -• - ( I II II III II II I t II jj 11 1 II I jj II 1 • I � II ' I III ( 11 II pt X11 1 11 I I I t 1 �11 tl I 1 OoJIt 1 I 11 11 II � 0411 II nit It 11 ILI it I .. g • ,11 •• I �� it . _ - �, '. • : �. I III ;; I 1 II $ I It r II I u T' �I 11 It --q ' I1 ' 1 41 111. I 1 `• � i \I I �S y 4' EXHIBIT CITY OF PALM BEACH G 11 — J 10500 N. MILITARY TRAIL • PALM BEACH GARDENS..FLORIDA 33410-4698 MEMORANDUM DATE: October 30, 1996 "-' "' K, 3oJgb a TO: Henry Skokowski . FROM: Ed Tombari, City Planner RE: Petition -96 -05 - Northlake Commons Shopping Center The application for concurrency has been reviewed by the City Engineer. Both Seacoast Utility Authority and Solid Waste Authority Concurrency has been satisfied. Drainage and traffic concurrency has been satisfied conditionally. Please see the attached memo for further details. In addition, the following information is necessary to proceed with review of the above referenced project: (1) Code requires .the perimeter walls to be set from property lines sufficiently to include landscaping on the outside of the walla (2) Provide typical perimeter wall details. (3) Show existing landscaping surrounding the property line within 50 feet. (4) Provide a conceptual irrigation plan. (5) Provide typical landscape island diamond details. (6) The parking lot in the rear of the retail building requires -additional trees to meet code requirements (all parking spaces must be within 40 feet of the center of a shade tree. (7) Please indicate all wall terminuses on site and landscape plans. (8) Please explain the significance of the existing catch basin located in the northeast corner of the property. (9) The City has landscaped the median on Military Trail where there is a proposed left turn lane. Please show all of the median landscaping affected by this proposal. (10) There is a building east of this project that is not shown on the site plan. Please revise the plans to show all buildings within 100 feet of the project. (11) Please provide a narrative and aerial photo /landscape overlay of existing vegetation explaining how this plan meets the City's tree protection as required in Section 98 -5 (c)(3) of the Code of Ordinances. (12) Please include acreage for future development parcels 1 through 3 on both the site and landscape plans. (13) Please include building footprints, parking layouts and traffic circulation for all future development areas. Also, identify proposed activity (Rest. W/ Drive Thru, Financial Inst. W/ Drive Thru, Retail or.R�st. W/ Drive Thru) for each future development area. (14) Please include sign details (size, location and materials) for all three future development sites. (15) Please indicate on the site plan the ultimate roadway design for Northlake Blvd., including left turn lanes and median cuts for site ingress and egress. Also, indicate the width of Northlake Blvd. (16) Please include directional arrows on all intersections of site ingress and egress with Military Trail and Northlake Blvd. (17) The City Engineer is currently reviewing the site plan for engineering sufficiency. At this time, comments from the City Engineer are forthcoming. We will notify you if any additional information is necessary. Until the above - referenced deficiencies have been satisfied, the petition will not be scheduled for a Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting or a Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. A DRC meeting can be scheduled ten (10) days after all sufficiency requirements have been met. Police and fire officials will review the petition once the sufficiency has been met. Please include a narrative describing the changes to the project with all submittals. Please note that the petitioner may be required to provide additional information as the review process continues. &C 0- 21044 LINDAHL, BROWNING, FERRARI & HELLSTRON1, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PLANNERS & SURVEYORS MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Walton FROM: Lynnette Lannin DATE: October 23, 1996 SUBJECT: Northlake Commons Shopping Center Concurrency ( #96 -2104) We have reviewed the application for Concurrency Certification for the referenced project. We offer the following comments: 1. Conditional Drainage Concurrency. The applicant has submitted a signed and sealed Drainage Statement, prepared by Roscoe L. Biby, P.E. which states that "legal positive outfall will be controlled using a weir/bleeder system which will connect to the existing inlet located at the northeast corner of the site ". Also, water quality and attenuation will be provided by an on -site wet detention area and subsurface exfiltration trenches designed in accordance with SFWMD Best Management Practices and the City of Palm Beach Gardens regulations. However, it is not determined whether the proposed outfall system can meet .the City's performance standards. Therefore, conditional concurrency is satisfied subject to detailed design and possible outfall improvements. 2. SUA Concurrency - Satisfied. The applicant has submitted a letter from Seacoast Utility Authority, dated June 28, 1996, signed by Rim Bishop, stating that the referenced project lies within the water and sewer service of the SUA and that water and sewer capacity is available as of the date of the letter. Therefore, water and sewer concurrency has been established. 3. Conditional Traffic Concurrency. The applicant has submitted a revised Traffic Impact Analysis, dated August 30, 1996, prepared by Yvonne Ziel Traffic Consultants, Inc. Kahart Pinder has reviewed the T.I.A. and recommends approval on the following conditions in his September 3, 1996 letter: 1. A westbound right turn lane on Northlake Boulevard at the Project's entrance. 2. A northbound right turn lane and a southbound left turn lane on Military Trail at the Project's entrance. 3. A buildout date no later than December 31, 1998 POST OFFICE BOX 727, JUPITER, FL 33468 -0727 210 JUPITER LAKES BOULEVARD, BUILDING 5000, SUITE 104 (561) 746 -9248 FAX:(561) 746 -0272 WEST PALM BEACH JUPITER STUART FORT PIERCE OKEECHOBEE We previously requested additional information from the applicant concerning access to the site, and they submitted preliminary approval letters from Palm Beach County and the F.D.O.T. along with a sketch of the proposed widening of Military Trial. Since these are site related issues (1 and 2) and not concurrency issues, we will grant traffic concurrency with the condition that these improvements (1 and 2) and their impacts be addressed during site plan review. 4. SWA Concurrency - Satisfied. The Solid Waste Authority has issued a letter, dated January 25, 1996, signed by Marc C. Brunner, Director of Planning & Environmental Programs, stating that capacity is available for the coming year and through the year 2021. Therefore, solid waste concurrency has been established. LML /db cc: Bobbie Herakovich Jack Hanson To: Edward Tombari, City Planner From: Sergeant Jay Spencer Subject: Northmill Plaza -- Crosswalk Date: January 29, 1997 EXHIBIT I have reviewed the comments from city engineer Tammy Jacobs concerning the Military Trail crosswalk for the Northmill Plaza. Her comments are very good. There is, however, one comment I do not share concurrence with. I am referring to the comment stating that the ingress lanes and median cut should not have a speed hump. In order to provide the utmost safety of the pedestrians, especially the school kids, the speed hump needs to cross both the ingress and egress lanes and the median cut. To have the speed hump only cross the egress lane defeats the purposes of having a speed hump in the first place. The main reason for having a speed hump is to compel and cause vehicular traffic to slow down and yield to pedestrians. This safety measure must apply to both the egress and ingress lanes. Also, it is not practical to particially implement a safety measure. In addition, having the speed hump cross the egress and ingress lanes will achieve uninterrupted uniformity and consistency for the pedestrians as they traverse on the speed hump. Having a contour or elevation change in the speed hump could cause tripping or falling of pedestrians at an already unsafe location. It has been verbally pointed out that stacking may result in the ingress lane if a speed hump is placed across it. However, stacking will occur at some point anyway, either with or without a speed hump because of projected traffic flow. Inevitably, stacking will occur also because of pedestrians using the crosswalk at the same time vehicles are entering the plaza. With these factors in mind, there is limited merit in not having a speed hump. Further, having an elevated speed hump provides better visual identification of pedestrians for motor vehicle drivers entering the plaza. In addition, the proposed Military Trail deceleration lanes will help compensate in alleviating stacking of vehicles entering the plaza. I have noticed also in observing the ingress points with other plazas that they serve as mini speedway zones. This problem could be substantially reduced with a speed hump. While a speed hump will cause motor vehicle drivers to slow down and use extra caution, it will not cause them to completely stop. It is my opinion that the safety benefits provided to pedestrians by having an elevated 10' speed hump crossing the median cut and ingress lanes would out weigh stacking concerns. cc Chief FitzGerald Assistant Chief O'Rourke Captain Bunch Sergeant Brown EXHIBIT LINDAHL. BROWNINC;, FERRARI & HELL5TR01 CO�SLLiING E:N( I,NEERS, PLANNERS \ SLR %ENOKS 6 ` MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Walton G• QO. ,991 FROM: Linda Ma7>;otti 4r�( DATE: February 10, 1997 SUBJECT: Northmil Plaza ( #96 -2104) We have reviewed the Site Plan, prepared by Urban Design Studio dated January 24, 1997, and received January 28, 1997. We offer the following comments: 1. The Site Plan needs to show the proposed westbound right turn lane, as required to meet traffic concurrency, at the western entrance off Northlake Blvd. This facility was conceptually approved by Andy Hertel of Palm Beach County on October 3, 1996. 2. The Site Plan needs to show the proposed northbound right -turn lane, as required to meet traffic concurrency, at the southern entrance off Military Trail. The FDOT Variance Committee granted approval of the proposed directional left -turn lane on May 2, 1996, but the right -turn lane was not addressed in said variance. 3. The project entrances off the two (2) arterial roadways need to have 40 -foot turnout radii, per LDR Sec. 114 -215(c ). 4. We recommend the following Condition of Approval: The applicant will need to dedicate the 6 feet of additional R.O.W. along Northlake Blvd. to Palm Beach County prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. 5. The applicant will need to submit a lighting plan per LDR Sec. 118 -474 (4). 6. The Site Plan needs to show the location of wheelstops or raised header curbing to protect the proposed landscaped strips and islands from vehicular encroachment, per LDR Sec. 98 -68( c). 7.a. The proposed "Retention Area" top of bank should be delineated. b. The "Retention Area" should be noted as a wet detention area to conform with the Drainage Statement. POST OFFICE BOX 727, JUPITER, FL 13168 -0727 210 JUPITER LAKES BOULEVARD. BUILDING 5000. SUITE 101 (561) 716.9218 FAX:(56I) 736.0_721 WEST PALM BEACH JUPITER STUART FORT PIERCE OKEECHOBEE Memo to Richard Walton, Northmil PIA—, 96 -2104 Page 2 of 2 c. The existing inlet at the northeast corner should be noted as the proposed legal positive outfall to conform with the Drainage Statement. d. The applicant should submit a conceptual drainage plan with preliminary calculations to verify that the proposed legal positive outfall will be of sufficient capacity and structural integrity. e. It is undetermined whether the proposed outfall system can meet the City's performance standards. Conditional drainage concurrency was granted to this project, provided the applicant submits detailed design calculations for onsite improvements, as well as possible outfall improvements before construction plan approval. 8. a. The Site Plan needs to show a "Do Not Enter" sign at the bypass lane for the drive - through lane serving the Boston Market. b. The location of stop signs/stop bars needs to be shown for our review. 9. The applicant will need to submit a certified Boundary Survey, a Topographic Survey and an aerial photo, per LDR 118- 50(5)(a)(1),(c ). 10. a. The locations of vehicular access to "Future Development Area #1" and "Future Development Area #2" should align with the parking lot drive aisles and be limited to one access per area. b. The access to "Future Development Area #1 ", immediately to the west of Military Trail, should be eliminated to provide ample onsite stacking .distance. c. The 35 -foot access pavement width off Military Trail should be reduced to 24 -feet for uniformity. 11. We recommend the following condition of approval: The applicant shall submit a boundary plat, suitable for recording, for our review and approval by the City Council before the issuance of the building permit. LTM/dw PAPBGmrnw12104f cc: Greg Dunham Jack Hanson bcc3 EXHIBIT 7X IV CAO 3 O D n N N N ""� a 0 a • -- °��' --a �, a ° �, o °a o ,o m < G O sm so o CA op H R p �D cn UQ oa o. �w99.R��o 0 5.A 'o o y X• ,O O go CD N N 'C7 A cp W b 0. 8 Q O ;C 7L. _ 0. 7C Ai vOi C N A� R 7O wo f� N s. � ^o a n 'Cy O 3 3 �! �o m m be �0 0 � o �� T W - N UO O O C'n -z 0 (^9 7' c^9 O O `C 0. "�1y O^ CL 0 O� 9 OQ O � O a .at O co ai G. N5 y ty� A c N uoro ,"', a• y N �„' ° Oft. < � p• � A �. �• in Z+, N rO7� O 'CJ EXHIBIT 7X IV CAO 3 O D n N N N ""� a 0 a • -- °��' --a �, a ° �, o °a o ,o m < G O sm so o CA op H R p �D cn UQ oa o. �w99.R��o 0 5.A 'o o y X• ,O O go CD N N 'C7 A cp W b 0. 8 Q O ;C 7L. _ 0. 7C Ai vOi C N A� R 7O wo f� N s. � ^o a n 'Cy O 3 3 �! �o m m be �0 0 � o �� 0 �o coo Er A At Gt ° 0 N vA~i O. ►� 7c' CA ih ca pp A '1 N O7 •t% O CD r+ �f G N o A 0 pr CD �° `c'•c 0 5'� Wig 10 . OR '�' „may A �t Gi. C�' p CM CD F'e � �'7 CD � � d0 N "� O. Er N (or V a z o A y >t rz A (p O „�� �Cq 7 e0 N • "CJ v�a CO °r o '° O ° M rA ... R d A O N c� 4 fA QQ r* o a o co O A Vi 0 N OQ : y $to �' S CA CO I' E Co R. 0 CA gn cn 01 "q A p N O = G. n cy9 O D N ca ai A y V co Lh l �+ LINDAHL, BROWNING, FERRARI & HELLSTR EXHIBIT CONSULTING ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPE V MEMORANDUM TO: Marty Minor FROM: Tammy Jacobs �7Q DATE: August 28 1997 SUBJECT: Northmil Plaza (#96 -2104) We offer the following comments in response to the "Northmil Plaza: Additional Comments" submitted by the City of Palm Beach Gardens Police Department dated June 30, 1997: 1. We have no engineering objections to the use of school crossing signage in addition to the stop sign and stop bar at the Military Trail ingresslegress. 2. However, "strategically placed speed humps" could create an abnormal driving experience that may confuse the motorist more than alert the motorist. TJ /paz PA1P13CImemo\21041 c: Mark Hill Greg Dunham WEST PALM BEACH City Of P.8,G AV9 29 1997 pjAIM !" ZONING POST OFFICE BOX 727 JUPITER, FLORIDA 33468 -0727 210 JUPITER LAKES BOULEVARD, BUILDING 5000, SUITE 104 (561) 746 -9248 FAX(561)746-0272 JUPITER STUART FORT PIERCE OKEECHOBEE f - Lh TO: Kim Glas LINDAHI, BROWNING, FERRARI & .._LLSTROM, I CONSi:[ I ING ENGINEERS. PLANNIRS & SURIAYCRS MEMORANDUM EXHIBIT /0 FROM: Tammy Jacobs�� DATE: June 18, 1997 all 0 i UN s� S ON UBJECT: Northmil Plaza (1196- 2104) ! = , WAJ V0116 We have reviewed the response of the applicant dated June 3, 1997, to our memo to y'ou- datp_4--' March 18, 1997, in the form of a narrative and revised Site Plan dated June 3, 197. We of er the following comments: 1) Previously Satisfied, 2) Conditionally Satisfied. The applicant has submitted a copy of a letter from Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) dated April 2, 1997, which disapproves the northern Vehicular Access Connection (VAC) along Military Trail but approves the right -in, right -out, left -in southern VAC along Military Trail with the right turn lane. The Site Plan has been revised with the northern 'VAC eliminated. However, the Site Plan should be revised with the dimensions of the right turn lane and R.O.W. Dedication along Mlitary Trait shown graphically. The applicant shall dedicate the additional R.O.W. along Military TrO to Palm Beach County prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. 3) Previously Satisfied. 4) Conditionally Satisfied. We recommend the following condition of approval: The applicant shall dedicate the six (6) feet of additional R.O.W. along Northlake Boulevard to Palm Beach County prior to the issaxaee of the first Building Permit. 5) Not Satisfied We have reviewed the submitted lighting plan dated March 18, I991 prepared by Urban Design Studio which exceeds the minimum requirements of LDR Section 118- 474(4). However, it appears that the spillover illumination of the adjoining residential areas', is excessive. Po,ii crFicr uox 7.7 I611,1R. rLORIPA ;A48 ;1717 11O Jt)P111 R LAKES POLiLEVf%RI!, 13UILr)lh< 50003 1:111 ;Ji •lh i 1 7Vj-91n$ 1 AX (.%I) 746.0171 WEST P.V .H OCACH ;L1P1i1R STUART rC7R1 PIERCE OKtK,lOBrf., 'vorthmil Plaza 2 Project No. 96 -2104 6) Not Satisfied. The Site Plan shows the location of Type ' F" curbing to protect the proposed landscape strips and islands from vehicular encroachment, per LDR Section 98- 68(c). However, wheel stops need to be shown at each 10' x 18.3' parking space / 24' isle width configuration that does not front a landscaped area In addition, wheel stops need to be shown at each parking space adjacent to a sidewalk, per LDR Section 1 1 8- 474(2). 7) a, b and c - Previously Satisfied. d - Not Satisfied, We reconunend that the applicant verify the structural integrity of the aging storm outfall pipe by video camera. e - Conditionally Satisfied. We recommmend the following condition of approval: The applicitat shall provide detailed design calculations for on -site drainage improvements as wen as possible outran improvements before construction plan approval. 8) a and b - Previously Satisfied. 9) Previously Satisfied. 10) a and b - Previously Satisfied. 11) Not SatiAed. The turnout to the parking area at the western Northlake Boulevard entrance has been modified to allow approximately 100 feet of clearance at the entrance before encountering opposing traffic movements. However, the turnout to the parking area at the eastern Northlake Boulevard entrance needs to be similarly modified. The applicant states that, "the volume of traffic at this secondary entrance wUl not warrant this change" However, the volume of traffic is not a deciding factor, but rather the stacking distance off of Northlake Boulevard during parking maneuvers. 12) Conditionally Satisfied. We recommend the following condition of approval: The applicant shall submit a boundary plat suitable for recording, for our review and approval by the City Council before the issuance of the Building Permit. Northmil Plaza Project No. 96-2104 >014i34 JJV 13. °,,3? 13) When the "Future Development Area #1" and 'Future Development Area #2" are constructed, the vehicular access for rach parcel shall be limited to the internal north_ drive aisle TJlpas "BOWCao210ei. cc: Gres DUnham Jack Hanson EXHIBIT CITY OF PALM BEACH GA 10SOO N. MILITARY TRAIL - PALM BEACH GARDENS. FLORIDA - PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT TELEPHONE 407- 775 -8295 FAX 407 -775 -1014 FAX TRANSMISSION MEMO DATE: (I 3 I TIME: Z 5 TO: (,tWIvN Gt Gd LOS l G a 4 y FAX #: FROM: E / �j� �� J c, ` o -t- Pr3q. SUBJECT: N� �r t 2a . ��1 i� 0oy"1 b*qe.4 c COMMENTS: I I � »--► � -n..a� r., r� -�.-e s � C_a wt w, ems+ PIT or--eA - 06vt ir�-Cj- i �,C J---A2 P65OL1 Number of pages: (Including cover sheet) 1 z w Az Mw�l O O 9 a U ww� x d a 8 � N O Z a�i - N ; cz 3 > N O a�i - N ; cz 3 > ..., co b34.)N�° 0 "Cl 0 w 0 c �•= Cd O a a� > � p' �b o O U N Cd t: N U cn • 3 M S vi o '� b a EA o CA •� Q .tom U U 10 :3 cz W a CA Q rA a �• Piz z 9b ^ C13 U b CA CA rA rA A°., 0 0 N rA a N cd o � bb a c O 3 fj O U o .b r,n a, an ^; o �, o O CA W a cn O tb U O rA U Q cr O O Memorandum To: Edward Tombari, City Planner From: Sergeant Jay Spencer, Subj.: Northmill Plaza Date: October 14,1997 EXHIBIT 1 I am in receipt of the proposed changes made by Urban Design Studio, reference addressing our concerns of the cross walks at the ingress and egress points to Northmill Plaza. While they indicated that their changes are D.O.T. safe, stronger safety measures are warranted and needed to ensure the utmost safety of the pedestrians, especially the school children, utilizing the cross walks. Nothing less than the suggestions listed below are acceptable to achieve the highest safety possible. Further, the suggestions have been corroborated by members of the Florida CPTED (Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design) Network Association at their third quarterly meeting/workshop on September 19, 1997, consisting of law enforcement officials and city planners from other cities. Relocate cross walk at the Military curb cut from being immediately adjacent to Military trail to approximately the middle of the ingress and egress lanes, (midway point between Military Trail and the western edge of parking lot). Speaking in terms of a " Danger Zone," it is more of a danger zone having the cross walk adjacent to Military Trail. Putting the cross walk at the proposed location will enhance pedestrian safety. ► Utilize a transitional brick paver zone for all ingress and egress points. ► Add speed humps (not speed bumps), to all ingress and egress points. ► So that pedestrians do not form a cut through path to cross the ingress and egress point at Military Trail, landscape zones should be added. It is important that the landscape zones be large enough to deter pedestrians from walking through them. To aid in this deterrent, the landscape zones can consist of thorny type vegetation such as, the Box Wood or the Crown of Thorns. A non - thorny type vegetation that can be used is the Wax Jasmine. -Each of the types of vegetation mentioned are low lying and attractive. Install a decorative guardrail on both sides of the ingress and egress point immediately adjacent to Military Trail as a pedestrian deterrent to cross at that location. This will force pedestrians to use the proposed crosswalk. ► The eastern curb cut on Northlake Blvd. poses potential traffic ha?Ards. Due to no feasibility of a deceleration lane, the close proximity of the curbcut immediately adjacent and to the east, and lack of definition identifying the curbcut, this location should be used as an egress point only. ► Add signage indicating school times. EXHIBIT August 20, 1997 Mr. Edward Tombari, City Planner The City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 RE: NORTIL IIL PLAZA PUD -97-01 OUR REF. #16124.14 Dear Ed, lc� urban G( V_ CV n S 0 Urban Design Urban Planning Land Planning Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics Please accept the following as our response to the comments made by the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee ( SPARC) at the August 12th workshop and also the comments made by the Palm Beach Gardens Police Department ( PBGPD) in their matrix chart dated July 30, 1997 and the Palm Beach Gardens Fire Department ( PBGFD). I have duplicated the SPARC comments you referenced along with the Police and Fire Departments comments for reference in bold; our responses follow. SPARC Comments 1. Boston Market is in a poor location. The exit only onto the main access road is to close to the intersection with Northlake Boulevard. No changes to the plan were required. 2. The consensus is that there should not be a requirement for landscaping in the median, although some relocation of vegetation from the wet detention area to the median would be. acceptable. No changes to the plan were required. 3. The consensus is that the eastern most entrance may remain as proposed although the City Engineer should attend the next meeting to explain their position on the matter. No changes to the plan were required. 4. The City Engineer shall attend the next meeting to explain their position re g: , e\ drainage outfall structure. No changes to the plan were required. co PBGPD Comments 111 0 1. Post signs indicating "school crossing". 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard The site plan has been amended to show a "school crossing" sign Suite 600 The Concourse__,,' at the Military ail exit. West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 -6582 �' 407.689.0066 407.689.0551 fax Stuart, Florida 407.283.0022 San Juan Capistrano, CA 714.489.8131 NorthMil LCC 35 Mr. Ed Tombari August 20, 1997 Pacre Two 2. Strategically place speed humps (not speed bumps) at the main ingress and egress points. This may entail realigning cross walks. The petitioner believes that the traffic at the main ingress and egress points will already operate at a slow speed. Therefore, the addition of speed humps is not warranted. PBGFD Comments 1. Soften end of landscape islands adjacent to the proposed fire truck route. The site plan has been amended to soften the end of the _landscape islands, as specified by the Fire Department, adjacent to the proposed fire truck route. In addition to the revisions referenced above, the following changes have also been made: ■ We have placed wheel stops at all 10'x18'5" parking spaces. ■ The architectual elevations have been revised to substitute to the words "sign area" for "sign panel ". ■ The landscape plan has been amended to be consistent with the revisions referenced above. Should you need any additional information, please let me know. We look forward to a final review by the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee at their special meeting on September 2nd Sincerely, Urban Design Studio Henry Skokow i, P Principal sp Attachments: Six (6) copies each: NorthMil Plaza site plan, landscape plan, architectural elevations and sign detail sheet cc: NorthMil Partners Rocky Biby, Kimley Horn Joe Pollock, Kimley Horn Ted Davis, Theodore E.Davis Frank Mowitz, Albertson's Roger Birt, Albertson's Greg Johnson, Albertson's NorthMil LCC 35 FROM URBAN DESIGN STUDIO WPB (�'t QQEXHIBIT crlr-°nno 0.3 1997 12:34 TO: SEE DISTRIBUTION LIST FROM. HENRY SKOKOWSKI DATE: OCTOBER 29, 1997 RE: NORTHMIL PLAZA PUD -97- 01 CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP MEETING OUR REP. #16124.14 Distribution List: Andrew Brock John Preston Peter Brock Yvonne Zeil Frank Mowitz Garren Owens Rocky Biby Sandra Parks NO. 12 P. 1 Urban Design Urban Planning Land Planning Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics bcc: Greg Johnson Due to the City of Palm Beach .Gardens' workload, the above referenced project has been removed from City of Palm Beach Gardens City Council Workshop Meeting being held on November 6A at the Palm Beach Gardens Municipal Complex and has been rescheduled for November 20th. We appreciate everyone's patience in the rescheduling of this project. Again, it will be necessary for all of the above referenced individuals to attend that meeting in order to address any issues which may be raised by the Council or any residents who may be present. Again, thank you for your patience and please contact Sandra Parks of our office to confirm your availability. cc: Marty Minor, City of Palm Beach Gardens 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 600 The Concourse ooa r� Dow I' 1;'0r'l" West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 -6582 T x Nom � �J�l 561.689.0066 561.689.0551 fax NMIL1029.MEM 1rY1� r�u �Illlry( LCC 35 Fixt J - - _ Irvine, CA 714.489.8131 Fr ^'IJ PhoneR city Oi P&G. OCT 31 1997, & INP cn ZONING `� FROM URBAN DESIGN STUDIO WPB Kinky -Horn and Associates, Inc. MFMOItANDC31 To: Hank Skowkoski From: Rocky Biby 11.07.1997 P. 2 ( EXHIBIT Via Facsimile 5611649 -0551 rate: November S, 1997 RE: Northmil Plaza Job # 047091.00 A.s you requested, Mr. Joe Pollock and I have :reviewed the proposal from Sergeant Jay Spencer to relocate the cross walk at the Military Trail entrance approximately 15 feet oast of the right-of-way line. The following is a list of concerns we have regarding this proposal: A. In order for the proposed sidewalkrelocation to function properly, a fence or other physical barrier would need to be constructed along the western edge of the side walk. Otherwise pedestrians will continue in a north / south path. It is not anticipated that FDOT would approve of this physical barrier in their right -of -way. B. Two sets of stop bars and stop sighs would be required, one 4 feet east of the travel lane of Military Trail and one 4 feet east of the cross walk. It is not anticipated that high volumes of pedestrian traffic would occur throughout the day but would primarily occur in the .morning and mid- 41temaon during school arrivals and departures. It is our experience that vehicles would tend not to stop at the fast stop bar / stop sign and only stop at the stop bar / stop sign prior to entering Military Trail. This would create a more hazardous vchicle/pedest ian conflict than the single stop bar / atop sign located 4 feet east of the cross walls at the right -of -way line. In sum=ry, it is our opinion that allowing the pedestrian path to rea+Ai*+ in a north/south position in lieu of transitioning the path eastward and westward would be the safer condition. ■ ._TEL bat 562 ?st11 FAX Sal Set 9480 OfpB NHOH- tYih l x r 'C CW0470 100VVK000&=?kSK0K0W VL30G7ljz a $vilt .= Got 21st S;rxl Verc ; each, . --w Ida 323do Z699 C99 406 1dd W CT 08.0 L6/90/11 DATE: TO: FROM: RE: EXHIBIT CITY OF PALM BEACH GAWM 10500 N. MILITARY TRAIL • PALM BEACH GARDENS. FLORIDA 33410 -4698 December 9, 1997 Hank Skokowski, Urban Design Studio Edward Tombari, City Planner r SP- 97 -01: NorthMil Plaza Staff is working to ensure that all outstanding issues of neighborhood compatibility and site des.igh concerning this project are resolved before this petition is scheduled for further review by City Council. In order to properly address these issues, please revise your site plan so that the following is reflected: (1) Lighting. Staff would like to see the 30 foot high light poles along the northern and eastern boundaries reduced to a maximum height of 20 feet. (2) Parking. Staff still has concerns about parking availability associated with the stand alone out - parcel restaurants when using the "shopping center" parking criteria. Please provide a parking analysis utilizing the "restaurant" parking criteria in Section 118 -476 of the LDRs for both restaurant outparcels. (3 ) Future Development Area Kilmher 3. Staff has a concern with showing a parking configuration and drive -thru on the site plan for a use which is defined as a future development area. Please amend the representation of this area so that it is consistent with the other two future development areas. The parcels should be shown as blank until the site plan. is amended. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any other questions, please contact me at 775 -8295. CC: Roxanne Manning Marty Minor \eat CD CD rA V. ' C CD CR co QQ < CA QQ 0 c1 1--c 0 ! z CAD 0 CD 0 0 CA W to W 0 A CA Cb 0 Cl) Cb CO3 (A ( i CD x x X X ----------- — ...... 0 .- 30 A CD C> CD CD Oeb C/i (ON (IQ CD cm Co CFQ rn 10 CD LA LA 00 >? W 0 CD CD El co 00 OR :r w w 0 "0 v 00 co co a CD 0 a co rA W (A rA H W CD M 0 c1 1--c 0 ! z CAD 0 CD 0 0 CA W to W 0 A CA Cb 0 Cl) Cb CO3 (A ( i > CD cD Co CD ga 0 -rj CD CD CD Al 23 0 . ... ...... 0 .- 30 CD CD Oeb C/i (IQ CD cm Co CFQ rn 10 CD CD UQ CD CD 0 CD CD El co > CD cD Co CD ga 0 -rj CD CD w x 0 z b 0 �-3 bd CD O O O a o o_ as P 4�.- ^� 1 w x 0 z b 0 �-3 bd CD O O O a o o_ as P 4�.- ab CN N In o o CD M �-t fA y H CD CD 'z1 V1 co 0.0 (D O yCy QQ Cl) CD CA LA 03 t! N �°o COD N• H .... ' vii N CrQ. LL 1 W LA 01 W C i 1 CA b r. {,.,1 b '0 < 9D 7�C H co (Q GL 'O H N H N '0 CD O (D CA CO G CCD H v CID ab CN CD a o o CD M fA y H CD CD co (D jar- Ice C- e �--x e -X A 0 A .N TI ce 4z v k- -r—VI CL ce-r� rA I!kx so Jk a -1—OL 1 EXHIBIT City of Palm Beach 1i - R 46 CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION DATE: December 18, 1997 lul u�:s►11 lu TO: Roxanne Manning, Growth Management irector FROM: Byron Pepitone, Code Enforcement Sup SUBJECT: Noise survey On December 15' & 161 Code enforcement conducted a noise sampling from behind the Albertsons located in Jupiter at the intersection of A I A and Indiantown Road. These readings are attached. The tests were run to simulate approximately the same conditions as would be encountered at the proposed Albertson location in Palm Beach Gardens. After evaluating the readings collected there does not appear to be any real noise problems with this operation. There is a occasional reading that is above the 55db allowed but it is common practice that in order for a noise to be a violation of a code it must be sustained for a period of time. The noises we encountered were more of the nuisance type, such as a hom or passing car, and are not really a violation of a noise code. CACODENRMEMOS\albertniose 1.wpd 12/15/97 12/16/97 Albertsons - Indiantown Rd, Jupiter Albertsons - Indiantown Rd, Jupiter 3 ft behind the wall in the rear 10 ft behind the wall in the rear Overcast, cool, wind W at 10 knots No Clouds, cool, wind S 5 to 10 knots Men working in the area, unloading Trucks unloading .Base - 45 to 48 db Base - 44-46 db TIME db EVENT TEVIE db EVENT 1138 50 Cars on Indiantown Rd. 0545 48 Semi unloading 1140 52 Car passing 0548 66 Semi starting engine 1141 60 Horn (test) 1/' 0550 57 -62 Semi departing the area 1143 52 Heavy traffic Indiantown Rd 0553 57 Loading door closing 1145 48 0600 47 Normal 1146 46 0602 49 Traffic from bridge 1147 50 Car driving by 0607 54 Train running 1148 50 Car driving by 0608 70 Train Horn from west 1149 58 Truck on Indiantown Rd. 0610 54 Train running 1150 51 Cars on Indiantown Rd. 0615 58 Wind gust - trees 1151 55 Motorcycle t/' 0623 49 Bread truck arrived 1152 48 Man talking 0625 53 Truck backing with a beeper 1153 51 Traffic Indiantown Rd 0626 54 Train running 1154 52 Traffic Indiantown Rd 0627 68 Train horn from the west ✓� 1155 51 -53 Unloading trailer 0632 54 Unloading bread truck 1157 48 Unloading truck 0636 54 Car on bridge 1158 46 0637 59 Semi on bridge t----' 1159 54 Horn on Indiantown Rd 0638 55 Bread truck unloading ✓'� 1200 50 0640 56 Semi on bridge 1201 50 Unloading truck 0641 57 Bread truck door closing 1203 45 No traffic on Indiantown Rd 0645 56 Jet flying over L%� 1204 45 0648 55 Traffic on bridge 1205 47 0650 47 Car driving by 1206 47 Workmen 50ft to the north 0651 51 Traffic on the bridge 1208 49 Workmen 0653 53 Traffic on the bridge 0654 49 Car driving by 0657 58 Traffic on the bridge 0700 62 Harley on the bridge ✓ 0702 48 Car driving by 0705 45-46 Base readings CACODENNAEMOSWbeftiose l .wo 2 December 23, 1997 EXHIBITm urban (E-�- m+H 99 Mr. Edward Tombari, City Planner The City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 RE: NORTHMIL PLAZA (PETITION SP- 97 -01) OUR REF #16124.14 - Dear Ed, Urban Design Urban Planning Land Planning Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics Please accept the following as our response to Item #11 of Tammy Jacobs' memorandum dated December 17, 1997. I have duplicated Ms. Jacobs' comments for your reference in bold; our responses follow. TAMMY JACOBS MEMO OF 12/17/97 �._ 11) Regarding the "Entry Detail ", as shown on the revised Landscape Detail sheet, we recommend that the applicant refer to FDOT index number 17344 as a guideline for design. Specifically we suggest the following improvements. • The pavement striping delineating the ingress lane crosswalk should be extended through the median cut and across the egress travel lane / speed hump. The site plan, entry detail, and landscape plan have been amended accordingly. • The entire crosswalk should be striped showing a minimum width of 10'. The site plan, entry detail, and landscape plan have been amended accordingly. • The proposed 10' speed hump should be located only within the egress lane. The ingress lanes and median cut should not have a speed hump. The site plan, entry detail, and landscape plan have been amended accordingly. • The applicant shall provide a detail of the speed hump in plan view and cross section view. We suggest that the speed hump be constructed such that 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 600 The Concourse West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 -6582 561.689.0066 561.689.0551 fax RSPNS 1223TJMEM.122397 i Irvine, CA 714.489.8131 Mr. Edward Tombari December 23, 1997 Page 2 there is a 10' flat area for pedestrians to traverse. The site plan, entry detail, and landscape plan have been amended accordingly. • A School Crossing Sign (S2 -1) should be added at the egress lane crosswalk location in addition to the proposed "No Stopping On Crosswalk" sign. The site plan, entry detail, and landscape plan have been amended accordingly. • We recommend placing a School Crossing Sign (S2 -1) at the ingress lane crosswalk. The site plan, entry detail, and landscape plan have been amended accordingly. • The proposed pavement marking "SCHOOL CROSSING" shown on the speed hump should be relocated approximately 95' east to the P.C. of the internal drive aisle intersection and the marking should be revised to read "SCHOOL ". The site plan, entry detail, and landscape plan have been amended accordingly. • A School Advance Sign (S1 -1) should be added at the new "SCHOOL" pavement marking location. The site plan, entry detail, and landscape plan have been amended accordingly. • The applicant will need to secure a permit from F.D.O.T. for the sidewalk to be placed outside the Military Trail R.O.W. The sidewalk will be permitted in accordance with FDOT requirements. The Boundary Plan should convey public access to the sidewalk to be placed outside the Military Trail R.O.W. The Boundary Plat will convey public access to the sidewalk. • The Site Plan and Landscape Plan should be revised to reflect the above changes to the "Entry Dertail" as shown on the Landscape Detail sheet. The Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Landscape Detail sheet have been revised to reflect the changes to the "Entry Detail" on the Landscape Detail sheet. RSPNS 1223TJMEM.122397 r 1 Mr. Edward Tombari December 23, 1997 Page 3 In addition, we have added the following note to our Site Plan. "FUTURE VEHICULAR ACCESS TO `FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AREA 1, AND `FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AREA Y SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE NORTH -SOUTH DRIVE AISLE. " Based on the sufficiency of the attached materials, we hope that their review will not result in any further delay to the processing of this petition. If you have any questions or comments with regard to these issues, please feel free to contact me. It is our understanding that we will be scheduled td, . be heard at the January 8' City Council meeting. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. Sincerely, Urban Design Studio Henry Skolcowski, AICP Principal sp Attachments: six (6) copies each of: Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Landscape Detail Sheet cc: Roxanne Manning, Growth Management Director City of PBG NorthMil Partners Larry Smith RSPNS 1223TJMEM.122397 Mr. Edward Tombari, City Planner The City of Palm Beach Gardens 10500 N. Military Trail Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 RE: NORTHMIL PLAZA (PETITION SP- 97 -01) OUR REF #16124.14 Dear Ed, Urban Design Urban Planning Land Planning Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics In response to our meeting of January 5', during which we reviewed the noise related issues for the above referenced project, we have attached eight (8) sets of amended plans which reflect those > `: discussions and the revisions to, which we agreed. The revisions being submitted `today are as' follows: RESPONSE to COMMENTS from MEETING of JANUARY 5, 1998 • The attached plans have been amended, where necessary, to show the enclosure of the loading d6ck at the rear of the Albertsons' store. (See architectural elevations) • The attached plans show the addition of signage on the rear of the Albertsons' store (east elevation) to read "NO IDLING OF TRUCKS WITH MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ". (See architectural elevations and site plan) • The attached plans have been amended to show the addition of signage to the landscape island north of the compactor that reads "NO IDLING OF TRUCKS WITH MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ". (See site plan) • The attached plans have been amended to show the addition of pavement markings to the drive aisle north and east of the Albertsons store that read "NO STANDING/FIRE LANE ". (See site and landscape plans) • The attached plans have been amended to show a portion of the 6' wall adjacent to residential increased to a height of 8'. This is specifically to the north and east of the Albertsons' store. (See site and landscape plans for locations and landscape details sheet for elevations & sections) • The attached detail sheet has be .V e o show 6' and 8' perimeter wall elevati . 's,` a� section RSPNS0106ET.010698 �l 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 600 The Concourse West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 -6582 561.689.0066 561.689.0551 fax Irvine, CA 714.489.8131 Via• y �.— bf �l 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 600 The Concourse West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 -6582 561.689.0066 561.689.0551 fax Irvine, CA 714.489.8131 1 , Mr. Edward Tombari January 06, 1998 Page 2 • The attached plans have been amended to show a 2' band of sound absorptive treatment, having a minimum NRC = .75, added along the top of the 8' perimeter wall elevation and section. • A note has been added to the wall detail indicating "SEAL AND GROUT ALL JOINTS AND SEAMS WITH NON - SHRINK MATERIAL". The attached materials are all as we have previously discussed and specifically agreed to on Monday and are consistent with the recommendations of your, sound consultant. Thank you for your assistance in this regard Sincerely, Urban Design Studio Henry Skokowski, AICP Principal sp Attachments: eight (8) copies each of. Site Plan, Landscape Plan, Landscape Detail Sheet, and Architectural Elevation Sheet A -3 cc: Roxanne Manning, Growth Management Director City of PBG NorthMil Partners Larry Smith Martin Perry RSPNS0106ET.010698 DATE: TO: FAX NO. FROM: SUBJECT: yrr l SET 1 7' 4 5 uc.v EXHIBIT CITY OF PALM BEACH G 10500 N. MILITARY TRAIL • PALM BEACH GARDENS. FLORIDA 334144698 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION PHONE 561- 775 -8295 FAX 561- 775 -1014 I UY0 1, Ed REMARKS: L CQ off^" CrLp--v 'tiA i 1 n 0 u e .p rv, s. S I S S U. Q�2 d, Ctr1t,cQ.l, � o„� ,�U DvA.&A_P-0- 1 acvzss 1-o •ParYrs Number of a es: p g (including cover sheet) r es G Tv,4L- Memorandum To: Edward Tombari, City Planner From: Sergeant Jay Spencer 1 - k t tom`` Subject: Northmill Plaza -- Crosswalk pe«m6 v- Date: kmxzq 29,19? 19 4 7 I have reviewed the comments from city engineer Tammy Jacobs concerning the Military Trail crosswalk for the Northmill Plaza. Her comments are very good. There is, however, one comment I do not share concurrence with. I am referring to the comment stating that the ingress lanes and median cut should not have a speed hump. In order to provide the utmost safety of the ; ;= pedestrians, especially the school kids, the speed hump needs to cross both the ingress and egress" :4 lanes and the median cut. To have the speed hump only cross the egress lane defeats the purposes of having a speed hump in the first place. The main reason for having a speed hump is to compel and cause vehicular traffic to slow down and yield to pedestrians. This safety measure must apply to both the egress and ingress lanes. Also, it is not practical to particially implement a safety measure. In addition, having the speed hump cross the egress and ingress lanes will achieve uninterrupted uniformity and consistency for the pedestrians as they traverse on the speed hump. Having a contour or elevation change in the speed hump could cause tripping or falling of pedestrians at an already unsafe location. It has been verbally pointed out that stacking may result in the ingress lane if a speed hump is placed across it. However, stacking will occur at some point anyway, either with or without a speed hump because of projected traffic flow. Inevitably, stacking will occur also because of pedestrians using the crosswalk at the same time Vehicles are entering the plaza. With these factors in mind, there is limited merit in not having a speed hump. Further, having an elevated speed hump provides better visual identification of pedestrians for motor vehicle drivers entering the plaza. In addition, the proposed Military Trail deceleration lanes will help compensate in alleviating stacking of vehicles entering the plaza. I have noticed also in observing the ingress points with other pla??s that they serve as mini speedway zones. This problem could be substantially reduced with a speed hump. While a speed hump will cause motor vehicle drivers to slow down and use extra caution, it will not cause them to completely stop. It is my opinion that the safety benefits provided to pedestrians by having an elevated 10' speed hump crossing the median cut and ingress lanes would out weigh stacking concerns. cc Chief FitzGerald Assistant Chief O'Rourke Captain Bunch Sergeant Brown t 15617460272 LW&H JUP I TER `' 591 • P01 iO3 JAN ' � `' � 46:47 EXHIBIT LINOAHL, BROWNING, FERRARI & HELLS Consulting Engineers, Planners Survey 290 Jupiter Lakes Boulevard Building 5000, Suite 104 Post Office Box 727 Jupiter, Florida 33468-0727 (561) 746 -9248 / Fax: (561) 746 -0272 TFLEFAX MESSAGE FOR: �� 7SWA9 w -I- AT (TELEFAX NUMBER): FROM: _ �s��1y ✓Aro��,..,, „ DATE.- NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS PA NOTE: IF YOU DID NOT RECEIVE ALL PAGES, PLEASE CONTACT: /!T/77Gf AT (561) 746-19248149. COMMENTS: CQ /cr �Sc��irr� ORIGINAL TO FOLLOW BY MAIL: *YES j J NO ,3 (� 15617460272 LBF&H JUPITER 591 P02/03 JAN 06 'ge 16 :49 Lbke LINDAHL, BR<)WNINC;, FERRARI .� I HAISTRo m, INS'• - t r !NSl 1 1 IN[ I m ANI I fq, I'I :FNNI K} \ • l!N'J! 'ir )f�ti MEMORANDUM TO: Marty Minor FROM: Tammy Jacobs DATE: January 6, 1998 r4: frF -SUBJECT: Northmil Plaza (#96 -2104) We have reviewed the revised Site Plan, Landscape Plan and Details prepared by _Urban Design Studio and received January 5, 1998. We offer the following comments: 1. Previously.Satisf3ed.. 2. Previously Satisfied. 3. Conditionally Satisfied, We recommend the following condition of approval: Prior to Construction Plan approval the "Typical Exfiitration Trench Detail" and data in Exhibit `C' shall be reconciled. 4. Previously Satisfied. 5. Previously Satisfied. 6. Previously Satisfied. 7a. Conditionally Satisfied. We recommend the following condition of approval: Existing catch basin #5 shall be replaced with a new inlet or properly cleaned of tree roots and any structural damage repaired -prior to certification of occupancy. 7b. Previously Satisfied. S. Previously Satisfied, 9. Previously Satisfied. l , 1't1.$f f1t11t'I 11ox 7 `• ivf -Irllt Fl 1f•II�H•117!: !In IUPITU IAKI$ k0tJ•TYARD. OUILDING SOW, tiUTlG 104 01- :1 Ij%K.N017 74ed1!:.: WL11 PALM HtACH IUPIIt.R ;I'IJARr IrIii 1+11'RtT f>A11<I1t)1111 f� 15017400272 LBF&H .JUPITER Northmil Plaza Project No. 96 -2104 0 Page 2 10, Conditionally Satisfied. We recommend the following condition §.of approval. • The applicant shall dedicate the ten (10) feet of R.O.W. along Military Trail to Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. The applicant . shall dedicate the six (6) feet of EL W. ` along Northlak ' Boulevard to Palm :'Beach Co. unty : :prior to the. issuance of the first Building .Permit. • The applicant shall submit a. boundary plat suitable for recording, for approval by the City Council before the issuance of the first Building Permit. • When the"Future Development Arta will n»d "Future Development Area M2" are constructed, 'the vehicular access for each parcel shall be limited to `the internal north- south.drive aisle. 11. Conditionally Satisfied. We have reviewed the memorandum from. Sergeant Jay Spencer received January S, 1998. We have no objection to Mr. Spencer's recommendation to extend the speed hump across both the ingress and egress travel lanes. We offer the following conditions of approval: • The applicant will need to secure a permit from F.D.O.T. for the sidewalk to be placed outside the Military Trail R.O.W. prior to construction plan approval. • The Boundary Plat should convey public access to the sidewalk to be placed outside the Military Trail R.O.W. prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. • The speed hump shall be extended across both the ingress and egress travel lanes . prior to construction plan approval'. 12. Previously Satisfied. TW P��P9Gmemol2lAAp c: Greg Dunham Roxanne Manning .. ,._...�..: ..,..._ ..,a..,,S.. .., rte.,. - �. .. i 1 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS NORTH LA IKE COMMONS Prepared for Northlake Partners Prepared by YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. 918 US HIGHWAY ONE LAKE PARK, FLORIDA 33403 407 - 842 -0907 February 20, 1996 Revised April 29, 1996 Revised June 25, 1996 Revised August 13, 1996 Revised August 30, 1996 EXHIBIT 2phihlG C4. vonne Ziel,. , . . K! :Ci. #t 42132 ` I TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION EXISTING CONDITIONS ....................... ............... ASSURED CONSTRUCTION ................................ ................ ............ MAJOR PROJECTS ........... ............................... 4 TRIP GENERATION 4 TRIP DISTRIBUTION 6 FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC .............. . . . . . . . . ... .................... 6 Growth Rate Analysis .............. ............... ................... ............. 6. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ANALYSIS ......................................... 8 Test One . 8 Alternate Test One 8 Intersection Analysis .............................. ................................... 12 Driveway Analysis .................................. : ............ 13 TestTwo ................. i ............. ......................................... 13 CONCLUSION ................... ....................................................... 13 APPENDIX A - GROWTH RATE ANALYSIS- APPENDIX B - INTERSECTION SUMMATION WORKSHEETS APPENDIX C - INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX D - TRAFFIC COUNT DATA LIST OF TABLES TABLE TITLE PAGE I Existing (1995) Daily Traffic ................................................ 3 2 Existing (1995) Peak- Hour Traffic ........................ ...................... 3 Trip Generation Rates .......... .................. I ............................ . *) 4 Trip'Generation ........ ....... .......... ............................... .3 Iritemal/Extemal Trips .......................................... ............ 5 .6 Passiby and New Trips ....................................................... 5 7 Projected Daily (1998) Traffic .................................. ........... 10 8 Projected Peak Hour (1998) Traffic ............................................. 10 9 Peak- Hour Peak- Season PM Analvs1s., ......................................... 11' ii Fn LIST OF FIGURES FIGURES TITLE PAGE 1 Site Location Map .................................... ................... 2 2 Project Traffic Distribution ............................ ................... 7 3 Future (1998) Traffic Conditions ................................................. 9 4 Peak- Hour Driveway Volumes ................... ...... ................... 14 iii INTRODUCTION r Yvonne Ziel Traffic Consultants, Inc. was retained by Northlake Partners to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis to assess the traffic impact of a commercial development which is proposed to be constructed in the northeast corner of Northlake Boulevard and Military Trail. The project will include a 3,500 square feet (SF) fast food restaurant, 89,619 SF of retail uses and a 3,600 SF drive -in bank. The project location is illustrated in Figure 1. Buildout of the development is anticipated to be in 1998. EXISTING CONDITIONS Northlake. Boulevard is currentl} operating at Level of Service (LOS) D and Military Trail is currently operating at LOS B in the vicinity of the site. Table 1 shows the existing (1995) average daily traffic (ADT) conditions on the impact area roadways and Table 2 shows *the same information for the peak hour. The ADT volumes were obtained from the Palm Beach County (PBC) 1995 Traffic Volumes Map provided by the PBC Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The peak hour volumes were determined by factoring the daily volumes by 0.091. ASSURED CONSTRUCTION Northlake Boulevard is presentl} under construction for six laning from Military Trail to Ryder Cup Boulevard. The widening will include intersection improvements at Northlake Boulevard at Military Trail. i .... _ }... a 4S it Ps r INTRODUCTION r Yvonne Ziel Traffic Consultants, Inc. was retained by Northlake Partners to prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis to assess the traffic impact of a commercial development which is proposed to be constructed in the northeast corner of Northlake Boulevard and Military Trail. The project will include a 3,500 square feet (SF) fast food restaurant, 89,619 SF of retail uses and a 3,600 SF drive -in bank. The project location is illustrated in Figure 1. Buildout of the development is anticipated to be in 1998. EXISTING CONDITIONS Northlake. Boulevard is currentl} operating at Level of Service (LOS) D and Military Trail is currently operating at LOS B in the vicinity of the site. Table 1 shows the existing (1995) average daily traffic (ADT) conditions on the impact area roadways and Table 2 shows *the same information for the peak hour. The ADT volumes were obtained from the Palm Beach County (PBC) 1995 Traffic Volumes Map provided by the PBC Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The peak hour volumes were determined by factoring the daily volumes by 0.091. ASSURED CONSTRUCTION Northlake Boulevard is presentl} under construction for six laning from Military Trail to Ryder Cup Boulevard. The widening will include intersection improvements at Northlake Boulevard at Military Trail. i PROJECT SITE BURNS RD. I HOLLY DR I YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING & PLANNING N.T.S. NORTHLAKE COMMONS SITE LOCATION MAP FIGURE 1 i W O J m m m 0 W U m m m m U co O m m m O O W U m m m m U U J Loi- LL 0) C) u- OQQ rn_(o Cl) (fl(orov cn N V- V' N O V:0) - c'7M00 v)conton 10 .- O O M (oONOOO U �'— F- (on ln(h M--7(n . -.--N NNCOn V NN(14 N In LL rnrLL OYQ V' V'cORv co r- 0)('700 Coco ";I! cc Na) (31toN cn NC70)0 V)N 0)c7(0 to Cl) ION d X -- N c7 c7 V:, v .- -N c' N N F- 0pQco a 0000000 0000000 ?000000 00000 00 0o OogoV m a Oov o000 �000g�g 00000 0000n J' U 0)cn lA V)U�IAN U')tn V1NQ) V Q V V N N V"vl V' co Q7N � C LLJ LL O Z ¢ - 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 Z :O Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 J J J J J J J 00000 O O O O O J J J J J 3t J JJJ JJJJ C (0.(o (o. m (o 0 JJJJJ to (o () to V` 'j .Q c0 co to to c0 V' U LL 7 :J > O > J LL. c0 O > �Q m O0 > J mm �.�aU. F- i LUW>- fr 0: W z �^ S� O r pOYO! Y J SJ)F- O W ❑YO 0 Lr J W NUM:Ln W Y= WS} z w¢ >iz�W m m S r 2 J rn agog S H �w� �� mz�=� 00) mgY� w >�_�(�¢ai ¢crI�D F -�O 1 O W >.J W 0QN LLI<; Qm��O (9�OJ0 F- W mr�N�� W a.mzmto rnU¢ mr�co._2W n.mzm0 o� z (~_o Z? O Oj W _ O O j N J > m J. J m m - � J 'm Q m It J .J. mm z K W n, Q Jlx- S J O YO fr W 0❑ < I. u=i=�- _ > > °igw zw w r-COzi - WW¢J�-mU O��O� (+ mr�(n_� zamzm LL �mS�(o_� ZamZco; O i O J m J Q m . ¢ Cn � W Y It } S It Q O F- Q ~ O ix O z J O cr O z J_ el MAJOR PROJECTS A review of the Palm' Beach County major project map indicates that there are no major projects which will add ten percent of the roadway capacities in the study area during the buildout of the subject commercial site TRIP GENERATION Trip generation was -estimated using the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE), Trip Generation, 5th Edition data. The proposed uses are estimated to produce a total daily generation of 5.,240 new trips. Since the site will incorporate three different land uses. there will be some internalization oftrips among the uses and there will also be a pass -by capture from the existing traffic on the roadway network. Per the request of the City engineer, the AM peak hour trip internalization was adjusted. to nine (9) percent to balance the trips. The trip generation rates are shown in Table 3 and Table 4 shows the total number of trips that the project can be expected to generate. Tables 5 and 6 -show the internalization and pass -by capture. The project is expected to generate approximately 223 AM peak hour and 471 PM peak hour trips. The anticipated ADT traffic translates into a radius of development influence of three (3) miles. 4 :r i K NORTHLAKE @ 1 -95 TABLE 3 TRIP GENERATION RATES 30- Aug -96 TABLE 6 INTERNAL/EXTERNAL TRIPS 03:35:07 PM AM PEAK TRIP INTERNAL TRIPS j PASS -BY AND NEW TRIPS PM PEAK TRIP RATES INTERNAL AM PEAK RATES I AM PEAK AM PEAK ITE ADT PERCENT LAND USE PERCENT LAND USE i CODE TRIP RATES TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT i RESTAURANT -FAST FOOD 834 632.12 55.87 51 49 36.56 52 48 'RETAIL LT 570,000 SF 820 LNT= .625'LNX +5.985 LNT= .589'LNX +2.37 63 37 LNT= .637'LNX +3.55 50 50 iBANKIDRIVE IN /SF 912 265.21 11.16 -56 44 43.63 48 52 3 3 24 11 12 812 TABLE 4 15 134 64 69 46 373 950 TRIP GENERATION 19 .15 87 43 43 8,816 353 199 155 810 405 406 ADT AM PEAK TRIPS PM PEAK TRIPS LAND USE SIZE TRIPS TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT i 1RESTAURANT-FAST FOOD 3,500 - 2.212 196 100 96 128 67 61 RETAIL LT 570,000 SF 89,619 6,599 152 96 56 612 306 306 'BANKlDRIVE IN /SF i a 3,600 955 40 i _22 • 18 157 75 82 TABLE 5 LAND USE RESTAURANT -FAST FOOD :RETAIL LT 570,000 SF BANK/DRIVE IN/SF :TOTAL TABLE 6 INTERNAL/EXTERNAL TRIPS INTERNAL TRIPS j PASS -BY AND NEW TRIPS EXTERNAL TRIPS INTERNAL AM PEAK PM PEAK I AM PEAK AM PEAK PM PEAK PM PEAK LAND USE RATE ADT TOTAL' ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT ADT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT RESTAURANT-FAST FOO 15 332 18 9 9 19 10 9..1.881 PERCENT PASS -BY 178 91 87 109 57 52 ENTER RETAIL LT 570.000 SF 7 475 11 7 4 44 22 22 6,124 141 89 52 568 284 284 i 37 BANKIDRIVE IN/SF 15 143 6 3 3 24 11 12 812 34 19 15 134 64 69 46 373 950 35 19 .15 87 43 43 8,816 353 199 155 810 405 406 3,576 USED 9 PERCENT INTERNAL FOR FAST FOOD AM 125 ' 339 169 170 471 236 236 LAND USE RESTAURANT -FAST FOOD :RETAIL LT 570,000 SF BANK/DRIVE IN/SF :TOTAL 1 TABLE 6 j PASS -BY AND NEW TRIPS ADT I AM PEAK PM PEAK PASS -BY PASS -BY NEW PASS -BY NEW PERCENT PASS -BY NEW TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT 30 564 1,316 53 27 26 125 64 61 33 17 16 76 40 i 37 43 2,639 3,486 61 38 23 80 51 30 245 122 122 323 162 162 46 373 438 16 9 7 18 10 8 61 29 32 72 35 37 3,576 5,240 130 74 56 223 125 99 339 169 170 471 236 236 1 v- TRIP DISTRIBUTION I Trip distribution was based on a TAZ zone analysis, to determine where the trips would occur on the roadway network. Since the three mile study area includes other major shopping opportunities, the trips were assumed to occur within approximately three miles of the site. FUTURE BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Growth Rate Analvsis Future background traffic was determined by applying growth rates to the existing 1995 Palm Beach County ADT volumes. Three year historical traffic count data was obtained from Palm Beach County. This*data was compiled to calculate individual link growth rates since the project is assumed to buildout within three years. The link of Northlake Boulevard from Military Trail to the west showed erratic three year growth because of the opening of Seminole Pratt Whitney Road to Northlake Boulevard and the signalization of the Northlake t access to PGA National. As directed by the City's representative, the 1993 to 1995 data was used to calculate the link growth for Northlake Boulevard from Military Trail to east of McArthur Boulevard and the 1994 to 1995.5 data was used for the links west of the Beeline Highway to Military Trail. The growth rate, analysis are included in Appendix A. 6 c T r- 0 0 0.00 (V O rn r— v r- 0 000 o PARK AVE. SILVER EACH RD. LEGEND 0 = Percent of Project Trips on Link 0 _ i = 0.00 Number of Project Trips on Link , Percent of LOS "D" Capacity j 0 0 0.00 BLUE HERON ' BLVD. 17 YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. TRAFFIC - ENGINEERING & PLANNING Revised 8!13.'96 NORTHLAKE COMMONS PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT FIGURE 2 HOLLY DR 2 105 0.78 ALT. Al A Q . �:. o: ' N -� I- •-Lo ' 262 'ten. 262 O 0.58 N ° 0.58 PGA BLVD. to sf C C) I Co c '2 00 �' 105 N.T.S. BURNS RD. 0.78 16 c T r- 0 0 0.00 (V O rn r— v r- 0 000 o PARK AVE. SILVER EACH RD. LEGEND 0 = Percent of Project Trips on Link 0 _ i = 0.00 Number of Project Trips on Link , Percent of LOS "D" Capacity j 0 0 0.00 BLUE HERON ' BLVD. 17 YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. TRAFFIC - ENGINEERING & PLANNING Revised 8!13.'96 NORTHLAKE COMMONS PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT FIGURE 2 HOLLY DR 2 105 0.78 ALT. Al A Q o: ' N -� I- •-Lo ' nj Q O F to sf C C) I c 26 34 16 1,362 1,782 838 3.03 3.96 1.86 NORTHLAKE BLVD. ECT ffSIJTE ./ � , M Cl c T r- 0 0 0.00 (V O rn r— v r- 0 000 o PARK AVE. SILVER EACH RD. LEGEND 0 = Percent of Project Trips on Link 0 _ i = 0.00 Number of Project Trips on Link , Percent of LOS "D" Capacity j 0 0 0.00 BLUE HERON ' BLVD. 17 YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. TRAFFIC - ENGINEERING & PLANNING Revised 8!13.'96 NORTHLAKE COMMONS PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION AND ASSIGNMENT FIGURE 2 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ANALYSIS Test One h Project traffic was added to future background: traffic and a Test One analysis of the study area AN-as conducted. Each roadway link was assessed according to Palm Beach County LOS standards. Figure 3 illustrates the future 1998 conditions on the roadways within the study area. The future background daily traffic :totals are shown in Table 7; the peak hour volumes are shown in Table 8. Both Table 7 and Table 8 show that the following links fail the Test One standards: Roadwav Frpm Tg ' Northlake Blvd. Military Trail I -95 I -95 McArthur Blvd. Alternate Test One The 1995 peak hour, peak season, peak direction volumes for Test One links which failed were obtained from the Palm Beach County Traffic Division. Table 9 shows the peak season, peak hour, peak direction traffic data for the failed links. Both links include projected background volumes and project traffic. The Alternate Test One anah•sis indicates that the links will meet the peak season/peak direction link standard. 8 LEGEND B = Level of Servi 25,123 = Existing Traffi 114 = Future Growth 1.362 = Project Traffic 26,600 = Total Traffic C 25.12 8,555 1,36, 35,04 PROJECT SITE 1 x i31 39 t •c \. A �y� r i 7 YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING &- PLANNING NORTHLAKE COMMONS FUTURE (1999) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FIGURE 3 .._ - U U.. LL _ Lo m @)O W W =a0 J Y F^Xar io OW z� U W O W a 0 U)lpm0 wWW0 UmUa J (DYQLL 0mOr-N0 m 0M rm � WF-LL tDV WMV rr t- t- tD Q D) (D to N N C'! (D N tr r CL 0cr Nr(7 V V V M (MNMN F- V) m M to O it) N 000- N to mNNr-CD r-tn OD r r r-- Q W (L r N r Oc CL cs pp co mU •a, Vm Cl) Qm to 0)(.) �(O N rm� U tncLL Q V (D V V (O r-- N(7 m0 mSLL 0('100 V V 0(a Na)m to mYQ co N(T 0)(0 N (D m U)N a Fa-• rr NMM�('7 NNNN m a 00000000 0000 )+00 000 000 r. ODU (D rr r (D Nq V Vv7 `77 .,j7 7N co W OZ ppppppp Oppp Q JJ V (D (D to (000 J(DJ JJ JJ 3tJ rD (DlD(DQ O F- 2 O W LL I ' p J J J J W< m mm cF 0 pY0 W = CC J W Z a Q =i LLI Q� Z BUJ w¢J�rnUQ O0-j ms�(n_�w mzm(n p J J J Q m m c W Z c Y0 W 2 w J m g W ZcQ = m(gs2 F_ M W f- ,= Z � tlj' wtwisCJ� rnU (! O -1 �m2M(n_2 amZm p J J m Q Y F- } Q g O O -) W Z I U'LLQ U)V,V, r to tom NOOtDmtDN 00 tOO mmrn(D =OOp- (�t�itDthrr rNrr LU Q U J JU NOU')l(1 tDQ 0(A Nr m (n Q M m 0 Q ONm Oct CC (o (n Q T V (7N mOQ c f+ 0 0N0 NN(7U)QU)Q r-O 0W CV) N(7N F- Ud _ IANNtoN(o(D (D(D(D(D 00 m t- r0(DN mr0pt- ow cl) m MO r�00 U') In (M ITV c a c S co t m(M(7 V O1r0N U)000N co co 0 U)M Q co (D m M U U-) . •'Qw V V m0 - 0�LL mtoc RNO co0m(n ' En LL vm mM(Dm mN(DO 0QQ 0 0r'to(7 M -7 Id co tD 1- Q r c N V V On N N N N ?v - LL 0Q Q 00000 • 8000 000 Q J" U V 0O00000 mU)to v U)U') to to U) N V Q V V V V vm Q V Q N W u 00 N m Y p rn LL W O Q D O p 0 0 p 0 0 0 F =.� J V (D (JD tD CO tD tJD CJD tD (D V F LU 1 O Z Op 00 O_ J j J _ } Q m m m c c W Z SJ~ O pY0 LUX cgw F= Z c 4 c N= _.= Lu �O -1O O 0)U¢ F•- mS�(A_rd W mZm(0 p Q m m CO M F- D LLJ Y Z p p c g LU S a. W J cG F Z W Q c 1-W m N== ZF- W yJ Q W LL WwQ='F rnU �m =�(q_� c��OJ amzm 0 J m Q 6 w c Y f- G H Q O M O cr Z U U.. LL _ Lo m @)O W W =a0 J Y F^Xar io OW z� U W O W a 0 U)lpm0 wWW0 UmUa J (DYQLL 0mOr-N0 m 0M rm � WF-LL tDV WMV rr t- t- tD Q D) (D to N N C'! (D N tr r CL 0cr Nr(7 V V V M (MNMN F- V) m M to O it) N 000- N to mNNr-CD r-tn OD r r r-- Q W (L r N r Oc CL cs pp co mU •a, Vm Cl) Qm to 0)(.) �(O N rm� U tncLL Q V (D V V (O r-- N(7 m0 mSLL 0('100 V V 0(a Na)m to mYQ co N(T 0)(0 N (D m U)N a Fa-• rr NMM�('7 NNNN m a 00000000 0000 )+00 000 000 r. ODU (D rr r (D Nq V Vv7 `77 .,j7 7N co W OZ ppppppp Oppp Q JJ V (D (D to (000 J(DJ JJ JJ 3tJ rD (DlD(DQ O F- 2 O W LL I ' p J J J J W< m mm cF 0 pY0 W = CC J W Z a Q =i LLI Q� Z BUJ w¢J�rnUQ O0-j ms�(n_�w mzm(n p J J J Q m m c W Z c Y0 W 2 w J m g W ZcQ = m(gs2 F_ M W f- ,= Z � tlj' wtwisCJ� rnU (! O -1 �m2M(n_2 amZm p J J m Q Y F- } Q g O O -) W Z I f� i z i LL Q �. Q as (V r" U U) O mm J U O Q N N `- x C% N F U U) W CL o ao °° ch O F CL rnY 0 C U O N r V r m U U- U - tYtL vco F- rn Q U- CDwQ CD-. Z r a H r N O H w w Y V) W O Un Z �a— CO o0 IX O0Q J - U CCO ce) ce) wW0U) mYY~ W pZ FQ-��Z CL g jO (D CO Z O W y J Q ' W Q 0) 0 J Q w [p a � o D w r w Q O � O U rn� CL _J Q IL' cp LL r2 ! J m w � Y � Y7 60 0 H a O O r c9i 0 (X Z i i f i Intersection Analvsis Capacity analysis, using a spreadsheet based on the 1985. Highway Capacity Manual Critical Movement Analysis, was performed for each intersection at the ends of the links which passed Alternate Test One link standards. The intersections studied in this analysis resulted in the following critical movements: INTERSECTION AM PM STATU$ Northlake Blvd. & Military Trail 980 1,152 Under/Under rapacity Northlake Blvd. & I -95 1,172 1,399 Under/Near Capacity Northlak-e Blvd. & McArthur Blvd. 943 1,133 Under/Under Capacity :The intersections are expected to operate at acceptable.levels of service in accordance with Palm Beach County :standards. Intersection summation sheets are included in Appendix B and the capacity analysis worksheets -are included in Appendix C. Traffic count data is included in Appendix D. The 1996 count was used at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and I -95; the 1995 count, was demonstrated to be flawed in a report prepared by David Plummer andAssociates for a Winn -Dixie project. 12 Drivewav Anal $i$ Based on the projected site turning movements, a westbound right turn lane will be required at the site access on Northlake Boulevard. At the entrance on Military Trail, a northbound right turn lane and a southbound left turn lane are needed. The driveway peak hour turning movement diagram is included as Figure 4. Test Two From Table 7, it can be seen that none of the project trips exceed 3% of the Test Two road*a' y capacities and none of the roadways within the impact area are included in the Test Two list, therefore the project meets Test Two Standards. CONCLUSION This project meets the traffic performance standards of Palm Beach County and can be approved 13 0 i LEGEND IA_ 37 (102) 2,953 • — Total Daily Volume PM Peak Hour Volume AM Peak Hour Volume Note: All intersections and driveways include passi-by and new trips 7 YVONNE ZIEL NORTHLAKE COMMONS TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING & PLANNING PEAK HOUR DRIVEWAY TURNING MOVEMENTS FIGURE 4 E N.T.S. 0 N d' LEGEND IA_ 37 (102) 2,953 • — Total Daily Volume PM Peak Hour Volume AM Peak Hour Volume Note: All intersections and driveways include passi-by and new trips 7 YVONNE ZIEL NORTHLAKE COMMONS TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. TRAFFIC ENGINEERING & PLANNING PEAK HOUR DRIVEWAY TURNING MOVEMENTS FIGURE 4 E N.T.S. �ia„sY" APPENDIX A GROWTH RATE ANALYSIS - i I i .. .., . -.. _ ... - a.. ��L,,•sx y strt� L is s k aYr w 1 S K O z p Z Q S O N W 0 Z 0 O . W N C W . Q p o _ W N Y 2 O) C7 r- r, r- r` CD O O LLJ Lf) Cv h- N J0O D ( nO N Q Q� - U, ¢ n N t`m OOOOM cW0 . r` Nn m0 O,fi `+ W j r O M r` n r.'r- W 8 O � c0 Q O) O) - N m (On N r0ON W P- NC)NM ��¢ n r nNO17 rq Oth ON �nNr- O ON O U . t` �C4 to Mw Ora OOn Ot` Q - (V cW� (DON: Np �n (D OOMO - (p�q D v? O W cD f7: '.�(00) In UQi N co Co C-4 O(O J cl O N N W. [� r N 6,f fV (D ' v rfi (D 0 �' QrnM �N e -NNN C4 E19 W W DL6)uj Wp��O� W 01010 V]117 W lnO !n , W N C91, 0 m ._ O110� N O 1�:qq�� tD GD Q w C4 Vi J O (O �cl t O r�: 0 NNQ N�N (7 V N Q u7 m N N N M Z O m N QNM2 NN NNNNNN NN NCV N 03 0 LLI JJ } U - _ J U - O o pj p p Q p J J J J m J J J a' m ¢ m m m cr d' WZ W m w >m W2 }� 2 } >d'JW W. � } Y F F- JWr¢. 2 ¢ m� Z 22 ¢ 2 N N W >JWO¢tD Jrn ¢m rrj W'D !YS Lrn C ¢ ¢ w¢ —�mU¢ ¢ �OJw0 00 =�¢ O C7 w w m2�rn_�w �w �mzmmrp zrn �w z o o >>: o J Jp J J J Jm J _! ¢ a Zma m ¢ m CD ¢ S m m w�: w m Z) pY Y i- F F- FJ WF C M-F !'mzr... Z �F- F-¢ W ,-1 F- H J J N�uWQj,F�U ��u_, 0 0Z)0 -1w 00 Liu_' O Sm2 za. mzmm z z p p LM m J w z < p c Y 0 o w ~ o ¢ to 2 2 r= J _ ~ w H ¢ m O O J J 0 J m _ 1 ¢ I ---------- - NNEW ws APPENDIX B INTERSECTION SUMMATION SHEETS Y INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY NORTHLAKE BLVD & MILITARY TR AM PEAK HOUR/PEAK SEASON TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 1998 TOTAL VOLUMES 274 908 431 193 383 AV 371 646 159 -215 .994 :479 1998 TOTAL VOLUMES 312 779 406-_ 430 1060 635 530 1088 297 152 805 403 l 1995 1998 RAW 1995 1995 ` = 1995 BACKGROUND TM TRAFFIC ADJUSTED APPR BACKGR MAJOR PROJECT TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ADJUST APPR BACKGR MAJOR PROJECT VOLS VOLS VOLS GROWTH PROJECTS TRAFFIC VOLUMES SB - RT SB - RT 1 231 231. 312 43 0 0 274 1261 123 0 0 -TH 2 765 765 1359 143 0 0 908 362 -LT 3 363 363 5 68 0 0 431 -LT WB - RT 4 163 163 520 30 0 0 193 81 0 18 -TH 5 301 301 791 56 0 26 357 250 -LT 6 327 327 10 61 -0 48 388 -TH NB - RT 7 305 305; 774 57 .0 9 362 59 0 31 -TH 8 536 536 975 100 0 9 636 -LT 0 134 13j4 25 -0 0 1.59 EB - RT 10 181 18.1 34 -0 0 215 -TH 11 824 874 1395 154_ 0. 16 978 - LT 12 390 390- 73 0 16 463 GROWTH RATE USED = 5.88 (10.27 +3 -57 +2.29+7.39)/4 1998 TOTAL VOLUMES 274 908 431 193 383 AV 371 646 159 -215 .994 :479 1998 TOTAL VOLUMES 312 779 406-_ 430 1060 635 530 1088 297 152 805 403 l INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY NORTHLAKE BLVD & MILITARY TR PM PEAK HOUR/PEAK SEASON TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ` = 1995 1998 RAW 1995.. 1995 1998 BACKGROUND TM: TRAFFIC ADJUST APPR BACKGR MAJOR PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLS VOLS;! VOLS GROWTH. PROJECTS TRAFFIC VOLUMES SB - RT 1 263 263 49 , 0 0 312 -TH 2 656 656 j 1261 123 0 0 779 - LT 3 342 342 64 0 0 406 WB - RT 4 362 362 68 0 0 430 -TH 5 841 841. 1641 157 0 61 998 -LT 6 438 438 82 0 115 520 NB - RT 7 432 432 81 0 18 513 -TH 8 902 902 1584 169 0 18 1071 -LT 9 250 250 47 0 0 297 EB - RT 10 128 128 24 0 0 152. -TH 11 652 652 1094 122 0 31 774 - LT 12 314 314 59 0 31 373. 1998 TOTAL VOLUMES 274 908 431 193 383 AV 371 646 159 -215 .994 :479 1998 TOTAL VOLUMES 312 779 406-_ 430 1060 635 530 1088 297 152 805 403 l i SEAS. ADJ. FACTOR: 1 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY GROWTH RATE: 1.92 INTERSECTIO NORTHLAKE BLVD & 1 -95 PROJECTED YEAR: 1998 A.M. PEAK PERIOD PEAK- SEASON TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 1996 1998 RAW 1996 1996 1998 BACKGROUND 1998 TM TRAFFIC ADJUST APPR BACKGR COMMITTE PROJEC TRAFFIC TOTAL VOLS VOLS VOLS GROWTH DEVELOP. TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUM SB - RT 1 156 156 6 1 162 163 -TH 2 0 0 490 0 0 0 0 -LT 3 334 334 13 0 347 347 WB - RT 4 164 164 6 0 170 170 -TH 5 689 689 1748 27 20 716 735 -LT 6 895 895 3; 0 930 930 NB - RT 7 959 959 37 0 996 996 -TH 8 0 0 1381 0 0 0 0 -LT 9 422 422 16 9 438 447 EB -RT 10 536 536 21 7 557 563 -TH 11 928 928 1781 36 16 964 979 -LT 12 317 317 12 1 329 330 SEAS. ADJ. FACTOR: 1 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY GROWTH RATE: ' 1.92 INTERSECTION: NORTHLAKE BLVD & 1 -95 PROJECTED YEAR: 1998 P.M. PEAK PERIOD PEAK- SEASON TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 1996 1998 RAW 1996 1996 1998 BACKGROUND 1998 TM TRAFFIC ADJUST APPR BACKGR COMMITTE PROJEC TRAFFIC TOTAL VOLS VOLS VOLS GROWTH DEVELOP.. TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUM SB - RT 1 153- 153 6 2 159 161 -TH 2 0 0 412 0 .0 0 0 -LT 3 259 259 10 D 269 269 WB - RT 4 398' 398 15 0 413 413 -TH 5 1182 1182 2413 46 38 1228 1265 -LT 6 833: 833 32 0 865 865 NB - RT 7 850 850 33 0 883 883 -TH 8 0 0 1467 0 .0 0 0 -LT 9 617 617 24 17 641 657 EB - RT 10 278 ` 278 11 17 289 305 -TH 11 898 898 1515 35 38 933 970 -LT 12 339 : 339 13 2 352 354 i �.a,_ ^• _ .. ... - � �`�'a y s, .' ��m ;`n' z a`@'. f { � -° � „ `yA � 6 s •'N.'s�..�„ > tjC's� � ' - i INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY NORTHLAKE BLVD & MCARTHUR BLVD AM PEAK HOURIPEAK SEASON TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 1995 1998 RAW 1995 1995 BACKGROUND 1,998 TM TRAFFIC ADJUSTED APPR BACKGR MAJOR PROJECT TRAFFIC TOTAL VOLS VOLS VOLS GROWTH PROJECTS TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES SB - RT 1 207 207 13 0 2 220 223 -TH 2 44 44 283 3 0 0 47 47 -.LT 3 32 32 2 0 0 34 34 WB - RT 4 43 43 3 0 0 46 46 -TH 5 1610 1610 1829 102 0 17 1712 1729 --1-T 6 176 176 11 •.0 0 187 187 NB- RT 7 47 47 3 .0 0 50 50 -TH 8 24 24 271 2 0 0 26 26 - LT 9 200 200 13 .0 0 213 213 EB -.RT 10 220 220 14 0: 0 234 234 -.TH 11 147 147 537 9 0. 14 156 170 -LT 12 170 170 11: 0 2 181 :183 GROWTH RATE USED = 2.07 ( -0.334239)12 INTERSECTION TURNING MOVEMENT SUMMARY NORTHLAKE BLVD & MCARTHUR BLVD PM PEAK HOURIPEAK SEASON TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 1995 1998 RAW 1995 1995 1998 BACKGROUND 1998 TM TRAFFIC ADJUST:. APPR BACKGR MAJOR PROJECT TRAFFIC TOTAL VOLS VOLS VOLS GROWTH PROJECTS TRAFFIC VOLUMES VOLUMES SB - RT 1 248 24`8 16 : 0 5 264 268 -TH 2 26 261 334 2 , 0 0 28 28 - LT 3 60 6p: 4 " 0 0 64 64 WB - RT 4 104 104' 7 0 0 111 _ :111 -TH 5 1906 1906 2143 121 :0 33 2027 2060 - LT 6 133 133 8 0 0 141 141 NB-RT 7 32 32 2 ' 0 0 34 34 -TH 8 35 36 200 2 ' 0 0 37 37 -LT 9 133 133 8 0 0 141 '141 EB - RT 10 141 141 9 0 0 150 :150 -TH 11 1484 1484 1958 94 0 33 1578 1611 -LT 12 333 '333 21 0 5 354 359 "rim e� APPENDIX C INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSES y YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. DATE: 35.3oe CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS INTERSECTION. NORTHLAKE BLVD & MILITARY TR ANALYSIS PERIOD: FUTURE TRAFFIC SB TOTAL PEAK HOUR: AM 1,613 ANALYST: LC 1998 INTERSECTION DATA I I WB TOTAL 1,013 : k WnLI= . . 218 LANE HRLY LANE MAXIMUM E6T= GEOM VOL DIST SB RT: 1 274 274 431 THRU: 3 908 303 N-S CRITICAL = LE .=T: 2 431 215 WB RT: 1 193 193 THRU: 3 383 125 LEFT: 2 437 218 NS RT: 1 371 371 THRU: 3 646 215 LEFT: 2 159 80 ES RT: 1 215 '215 THRU: 3 594 331 LEFT: 2 479 240 WB TOTAL 1,013 : k WnLI= . . 218 58 LT= 215 MAXIMUM E6T= EST= 331 NB THm 215 SUM OF CRITICAL CAPACITY TOT= 5 50 TOT= , 431 VOLUMES LEVEL E -W CRITICAL = 550 N-S CRITICAL = 431 0 TO 1,200 UNDER 203 1V9 ' 1 1,201 TO 1,400 NEAR :SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES = 980> 1,400 OVER INTERSECTION: NORTHLAKE BLVD 8 MILITARY TR ANALYSIS.PEMOD: FUTURE TRAFFIC . SB TOTAL PEAK HOUR: PM 1,497 ANALYST: LC . INTERSECTION DATA I ' — Llu 710 55 LT= LANE HRLY LANE E6T= GEOM VOL DIST SB RT: 1 312 312 E -W CRITICAL = THRU: 3 779 260 LEFT: 2 406 203 1V9 ', RT: 1 430 430 THRU: 3 1.060 353 LE-FT: 2 635 318 NB RT: 1 530 530 THRU: 3 1,088 363 LEFT: 2 297 148 EB RT: 1 152 152 THRU: 3 805 268 Lcc7: 2 403 202 — Llu 710 55 LT= 203 MAXIM IUM E6T= 268 NB TH= 363 SUM OF CRITICAL CkPACiTY TOT= 586 TOT= 566 VOLUMES LEVEL E -W CRITICAL = 586 N -S CRITICAL = 566 0 TO 1 2DO UNDER 1,201 TO 1,400 NEAR SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES 1 152 > 1 ,400 OVER LEFT: 2 330 165 A i S i EB TOTAL -• > 979 1 1,872 YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. SUM OF CRITICAL 1 CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS LEVEL , INTERSECTION: NORTHLAKE BLVD 8195 1,201 TO 1,400 ANALYSIS PERIOD: 1998 PROJECTED TRAFFIC OVER WB-LT= AM PEAK NB LT* ANALYST: YZ 368' DATE: 8130/96 CRITICAL= IMPROVEMENTS: TOT= 134 ES LT= SS TOTAL- 510 LANE HRLY LANE I I I GEOM VOL DIST ( 1 ( I TOT= 490' TOT = SB RT: 1 163 163 V THRU: 0 0 0 163 0 347 LEFT: 2 347 174 WB RT: 1 170 170 THRU: 2 735 368 LEFT: 2 930 465 NB RT: 1 996 996 THRU: 0 0 0 LEFT: 2 447 224 EB RT: 1 563 563 THRU: 2 979 490 LEFT: 2 330 165 A A 170 F- 735 <- - WB TOTAL- 1835 I ( 930 (- - I V I 447 0 I A ( 330 i EB TOTAL -• > 979 1 1,872 SUM OF CRITICAL 1 VOLUMES LEVEL , 563 UNDER 1,201 TO 1,400 V > 1,400 OVER WB-LT= 465 NB LT* 134 WB TH= 368' SS TH= 0 CRITICAL= 465 TOT= 134 ES LT= 165 SB LT` 84 ES TH= 490 NS TH= 0 TOT= 490' TOT = 84 A 170 F- 735 <- - WB TOTAL- 1835 I ( 930 (- - I V I 447 0 I A 996 I I I I I i I I I NB TOTAL I ( 1443 MAXIMUM SUM OF CRITICAL CAPACITY VOLUMES LEVEL , 0 TO 1,200 UNDER 1,201 TO 1,400 NEAR > 1,400 OVER E +W CRITICAL + N +S CRITICAL = STATUS? 955 217 1,172 UNDER CAPACITY f - ;A, •.� 5 t,.;?w ice` - �; ..-- ,. dF „`tom' e i r t, ar.;' -t V,'h pA YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC. CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: NORTHLAKE BLVD & 195 1 ANALYSIS PERIOD: 1998 PROJECTED TRAFFIC PM PEAK ANALYST: YZ DATE: 8/30/96 IMPROVEMENTS: LANE SB TOTAL- 430 I HRLY LANE I I A I 413 I _ GEOM I I VOL DIST I I I I I I I 1> I I 1265 <- WS TOTAL- 2,543 SB RT- 1 161 161 V THRU: 0 0 0 161 0 269 i 855 V- LEFT: 2 269 134 WB RT: 1 413 413 - _ _ THRU: .2 1265 632 LEFT: 2 865 432 NB RT: 1 FF 0 THRU: 0 0 0 - LEFT: 2 657 328 EB RT: 1 305 305 THRU: 2 970 485 LEFT. 2 354 177 657 0 FF 354' I I I I EB TOTAL 970 1,629 I NB TOTAL I 305.1 V I 657 WB -LT= 432 NB LT•= 1 MAXIMUM 238 WB TH= i 632 TH= SUM OF CRITICAL 0 CAPACITY CRITICAL= 632 TOT= TO VOLUMES 238 LEVEL i EB "LT= 177 SB LT•= 0 TO 1,200 UNDER EB TH= 485 NB TH= 1,201 TO 1,400 0 NEAR TOT= 485 TOT= > 1,400 44 NEAR -E +W CRITICAL + N +S CRITICAL = STATUS? 1,117 282 1,399 NEAR CAPACITY • REDUCTION BY 90 VEH/HR BASED ON 3 VEH/CYCLE WHICH USE THE 6 SEC OVERLAP PHASE 7. .� f YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS. INC. DATE: 35.308 CRITICAL MOVEMENT ANALYSIS INTERSECTION: NORTHLAKE BLVD & MCARTHUR BLVD ANALYSIS PERIOD: FUTURE TRAFFIC SB TOTAL ' PEAK HOUR: AM 303 'ANALYST: LC 1998 INTERSECTION DATAI I ' I - WB LT= 141 SS LT= E4 LANE HRLY LANE a0 L.1= J4 GEOM VOL DIST SB RT: 1 223 223 SUM OF CRITICAL CAPACITY THRU: 1 47 47 TOT= LEFT: 1 34 34 WB RT: 0 46 - 0 0 TO 1,200 THRU: 3 1,729 592 LEFT: 1 187 187 N9 RT: 1 50 50 -1.400 THRU: 1 26 26 LET: 1 213 213 EB . RT: 1 234 234 THRU: 3 170 57 LEFT: 2 183 91 ' I - WB LT= 141 SS LT= E4 LANE HRLY LANE a0 L.1= J4 MAXIMUM VOL DIST SB EBT= 57 NB TH= 26 SUM OF CRITICAL CAPACITY THRU: 1 TOT= 244 TOT= 60 VOLUMES LEVEL 64 113 E-W CRITICAL = 683. N-S CRITICAL = 259 0 TO 1,200 UNDER ' 2,060 723 LET: 1 1,201 TO 1,400 NEAR NB ''RT: 1 SUM OF CRITICAL VOLUMES - 943 -1.400 OVER INTERSECTION: NORTHLAKE BLVD 8 MCARTHUR BLVD LEFT: 1 141 141 ANALYSIS PERIOD: FUTURE TRAFFIC 1 SB TOTAL - THRU: 3 PEAK HOUR: PM 360 2 359 179 ANALYST: LC INTERSECTION DATA ' I - WB LT= 141 SS LT= E4 LANE HRLY LANE . _B1= 537 NE, 7n= .3 GEOM VOL DIST SB :RT: 1 268 268 0-.01.200 THRU: 1 28 28 NEAR LET: 1 64 64 113 RT: 0 111 0 THRU: 3 2,060 723 LET: 1 141 141 NB ''RT: 1 34 34 THRU: 1 37 37 LEFT: 1 141 141 ES :RT: 1 150 150 THRU: 3 1,611 537 LEFT: 2 359 179 ' I - WB LT= 141 SS LT= E4 L:AXWUM . _B1= 537 NE, 7n= .3 SOM OF CRi7iCAL CAP_CIT, I TOT= 678 TOT= 101 VOLUMES - LEVEL E•w CRITICAL = 903 N-S CRITICAL = 230 0-.01.200 UNCER 1.201 TO 1 400 NEAR SUM OF CRi7ICAL VOLUMES 1.133 > 1 400 OVER - APPENDIX D TRAFFIC COUNT DATA f PA1M BEACH COLIRTI IRU 1: aite Cede PA-41;:1WEPEP. PAGE: 1 1 : -w' Street: NDP.THlA1:i pLVTi I 1 e -S 5tr•ert: MILITARY TRAIL 'N i�iHER CLEAR hVtneTltS I,Y: Ptim)ry DATE: 21071?5 ..-------•------------------------------- -------------------------------------- - - - - -- -- - ---------------------------------------- T Froa Nirth From East Frc.r Sc•uta F" o Nest Vahicle Stein RT THRU LT RT THFIJ LT RT THSL' LT RT TFkRU L1 Total -- - - - - -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7:30 46 762 94 25 123 59 67 114 :1 39 M 6b 1016 7:45 67 211 95 41 141 105 76 143 IS :10 233 95 1293 i:•R TOTAL 113 413 189 66 264 164 143 257 69 89 4d3 159 2369 (10 AM G5 182 90 d5 106 82 74 124 29 57 ]S5 Joe 11`3 x:15 53 110 o "d 52 131 81 :8 155 36 35 154 121 1193 `''Y TOTAL 231 765 S65 i5I 501 327 305 336 1;S 181 S24 340 4720 ""n 19 11:4��G1.E5 FEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FO; T%li PERIOD: 7:30 AM.- 3:30 PAV BEACH CO:RfiTY TRAFFIC ::e Code : WESERIPATARE PAuE: 1 -i Street: NORTHLARE ALVD FILE: 3 -:: Street:: MILITARY TRAIL ( A -.. r.ER CLEAR ♦ ruestr;.s 1..• Ivy: Pruary f 1 G iz:E: 2;0 ?:S: ar From Rotth free i Zst Erse Snutb F r9a "Eit LT0:02 RT THRU LT PT' THRU, 11 RT TH2'J tT RT T•1 "nTJ 1T Tc:a] `.• =4 PM 53 174 10) 56 184 IOd 121 207 55 36 161 74 IS55 800 205 92 90 211 11S 112 271 69 :3 172 73 1533 84 145 B6 90 244 119 96 215 58 31 146 77 13 1 0 46 131 64 96 200 97 103 X09 68 2S 113 :t5 1301 ?OTAI 2b3 655 ,42 �M� � .•62 ad: ,,, 6„ 4.•2 9 ^2 250 123 33.1 .s. 3,4 555 0 -------- - - - - -- --------------------------------------------------------- - - - - ---------------------------------- —------------------ ' i t AY TOTAL i 263 656 33 42 1062 341 138 431 9 2 250 123 652 :14 5:.30 o af►titcl�l: 10 � �►tt"t„E,S PEAK PERIOD .ANAiYS]S J R THE PERIOD: 5:00 P? ; 6:00 PA DIRECTION START FEAT; Hn ........ rGLU11ES •••••••• ••• PERCENTS FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR Rigt,t^ Tt:ru LFft Total :Right Thru Lejt ,prep 5:0 P;; 0.94 263 656 342 1261 21 52 i7 East 5:0:' FM 0.51 3c: 811 418 1631 22 :1 21 South 5:C0 FN 0.06 132 401 250 1'66 t" `1 ]!• nc�t �•v. FM �:.Y6 1, A-52 old IO =u 12 ��• 2 (r,ticf Inte- sec:ior. kortq ;: :n U - Rd % 65c 342 12E1 East 3.62 : =1 433 1e41 22 Sa::th fr. AA .�i 40! 156 15;d 27 `7 16 T ='T D. =5 Y Site Code : 95UNLAN PALE' 1 FIIE: I954NlAM N-S Street: 1 95 WEST SIDE E -V Street: NORTH LAKE BOULEVARD LOCATION : PALM BCH COUNTY Sue of the Prisary ind Secondary DATE: 1/22/96 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 7:00 An ' 9:00 AM DIRECTION START PEAK HR ........... VOLUMES ....... * — — , .. PERCENTS ... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR PEDS. Right Thru left Total PEDS. Ri91d lhru Left ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- North 7:30 AM 0.96 0 163 0. 373 $36 - 30 0 70 East 7:45 AN 0.91 0 0 983 89S 1818 - 0 52 48 South 7:45 AM 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 Vest 7:45 AM 0.95 0 536 1245 0 1781 - 30 70 0 Entire Intersection North 7:45 AN 0.88 0 1$6 0- 334 490 31 0 68 East 0.91 0 0 983 895 1878 0 52 48 South 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 West 0.95 0 $36 1245 0 1781 - 30 70 0 I 95 :WEST SIDE ;...; N -------- - - - - W -+-E: [PEDS -] O ; 156-, 0 ; 334 ; ............ ; O (PEDS .] --------- --- -- - - - - -* *------------------ ..... -. ......... , ....- ••--- ........ - -, 490 - - -- 0 .......... 1139 ' - - -- - - - - - - - - - - ...... ............ , - - -- ... NORTH LAKE BOULEVARD 1878 983 -------------------- ------------------- ' - - - - -- --- - - - - -- 0 -- 895 '! -- •---------- - - - - -- ------------------ 1245 1781 NORTH LAKE BOULEVARD ... --------------- - -- - -- - - • -- - ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - . .................. ' 1579 536 - -- 0; - - -- ...... .......... ............ . ..... -- - - •- - - - - - - - - - - - - -* --------------- - - -- (PEDS - ] 0 : ............ : 0 0 ; 0 0 [PEDS .] 1431 ...; ; I 95 WEST SIDE ; ..� -------- - - - - -- I I PAGE: 1 :ite Code : 95VNLPM FILE: 19SUKLPK N-5 Street: 1 95 WE51 S10E E -1 Street: NORTH LAKE BOULEVARD LOCATION : PAVI BCH COUNTY Sua of the PriUTY and Secondary DATE: 1/22196 ----------------------- - - - - -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•-- PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PH - 6:00 PH ,1 DIRECTION START PEAK:HOUR PEAK HR FACTOR ........... PEDS. Right VOLUMES .......... ihrU Left Total ... PERCENTS PEDS. Right Thru ......• Left FROM ---------------------------------------------------------- North 4 :45 PM 0.88 0 146 0 271 417 - 35 0 65 East 5100 PM 0.96 0 0 1795 833 2618 - 0 68 32 South 5:00 PH 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 Vest 4 :15 PM 0.94. 0 353 1196 0 1549 - 23 77 0 Entire Intersection North 5 :00 PM 0.87 0 153 0 259 412 - 37 0 63 East 0.96 0 0 1795 833 2628 - 0 68 South 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 West 0.96 0 278 1237 0 1515 - 18 112 0 I 95 WEST SIDE ;...; N - W — + —E ,........... S ,........... , 0 (PEDS .J 0 153 ; 0 ; 259 ; ............: 0-[PEDS.) ------------= - - - - -* *------------------ .................. ..._..... .... - -- 412 -- - -- -- 0 .......... 1948 ` ............. .... ' — ---------------- -- .. NORTH LAKE BOULEVARD 2628 1795 ------------ - - - - -- -------=---------- 0 -- �— 833 ------ - - -- -- - - -- ------------------ 1237 1515 ' NORTH - - - - - LAKE BOULEVARD . - . - - - - - - - - T ------ . - . ------------------ ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . 1496 278 -- - -- 0 - - -- ................... ...... .._....... [PEDS ] 0 ; ; O 0 ; 0 ; O (PEDS.) . . _ .......... ,............, , ............, �_..; I 95 WEST SIDE ; I 5ite Code 95ENLAN H-5 Street: 195 EAST SIDE E-4 Street: NORTH LAKE BOULEVARD LOCATION : PALM 8CH COUNTY Sue of the Prism and Secondary PAGE: 1 FILE: 95ENLAM t DATE 6 ----------------- - -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ----------------- ----------------- PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM DIRECTION V w4 .•.-.f t Iwo Y L � �1,9%'� �- _. i _ .. FROM• PEAK HOUR FACTOR PEGS. Right Thru Left Total PEOS. Right Thru left North. Sue of the Prism and Secondary PAGE: 1 FILE: 95ENLAM t DATE 6 ----------------- - -- -------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ----------------- ----------------- PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 7:00 AM - 9:00 AM DIRECTION START PEAK MR ........... VOLUMES ........... ...... PERCENTS ....... FROM• PEAK HOUR FACTOR PEGS. Right Thru Left Total PEOS. Right Thru left North. 7:15 AM 0.00 ------------------------------------------------ 1 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 East: 7:15 AM 0.89 1 164 1584 0 1748 - 9 91 0 5DUth 7115 AM 0.87 3 959 0 421 1381 - 69 0 31 West 7 :45 AM 0.96 0 0 1269 308 1577 .. - 0 80 20 Entire Intersection North • 7:15 AM 0.00 1 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 East 0.89 1 164 1564 0 1748 - 9 41 0 South 0.87 3 959 0 422 1381 - 69 0 31 Vest 0.89 0 0 1095 317 . 1412 - 0 78 22 r r r i 195 EAST SIDE�!...i N -------- - - - - -- �.. ', i4—+ —E r r r S r r ... .. _ ....r i i i i•- 481 ...i [PEGS ) 1 ; 0 ; 0 0 . : -1 [PEDS ) . ............ . ------------- - - - - -* *—---.----------- .................. r r .. ............... - -- 0 - - - -' -- 164 ........ . 2006 . r r . ' --7 _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — ... NORTH LAKE BOULEVARD 1748 1584 ---------- - - - - -- --- •--------- - - - - -i r 317 -- -- 0 r r - - -- ------- - - - - -- ; --------------- - -- 1095 1412 NORTH LAKE_ BOULEVARD ... ' 2054 0 -- - -- 1381 - - -- .............'.' r _. - - - -- - -------*------------------- [PEDS.) 0 ............: 422 0 959 3 (PEDS.) r , r , ;...� I 95 EAST SIDE ; r• .. .:.. .. x F M � .:. !. A - � � �, w ' r ��'"S° ,�*- �r"„t" �'` �e { `j� "�'t 'Y . Site Code 15ENLPH PAGE: 1 N -S Street: 195 EAST SIDE FILE: 9SENLPM E -W Street: NORTH LAKE BOULEVARD :O:ATION PALM BCH COUNTY Sue of the Primary and Secondary / DATE: 1122/96 ------ - - - -•• --------------------- - - - - -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:00 PM - 6;00 PM DIRECTION START PEAK HR ........... VOLUMES ........... ..... , PERCERTS ...... FROM PEAK HOUR FACTOR PEDS. Right Thru left Total PEDS.RipBt Thru Left North 5:00 PM D.00 2 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 East 5:00 PM 0.91 0 398 2015 0 2413 - 16 84 0 South 4:00 PM 0.93 9 906 0 560 1486 - 61 0 39 West 4:45 PM 0.95 0 0 1148 352 1500 - 0 77 23 Entire Intersection North 5:00 PM 0.00 1 O 0 0 0 - 0 0 0' Fast 0..91 0 398 2015 0 2413- 16 84 0 South 0..94 . 0 8SO 0 611 ` 1467 - 58 . 0 42 West- 01-95 0 0 1160 339 1499 - 0 77 23 I 95 EAST SIDE ;...; N -----=-- - - - - -- ' W — + —E ..... , S ,.. ....... , ,... ....... ,. X737 ...; (FEEDS . ] 2 0. 0 0. ............ : 0 [PEDS . ] ---- .-------- - - - - -* *----------- --- ----- - -- 0 — — — — — 398 ..- ._..... 2632 , r . ; ------------------- ... NORTH LAKE BOULEVARD 2413 2015 - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ; ------------------ 339 —`� -- O - - - -- ------ - - - - -- ------------------ 1160 1499 NORTH LAKE BOULEVARD ... --------------------- ---------- - - - - -- - .............. .. 2010 .. 0 -- - -- 1467 - - -- - -- .............. ........ - - - - -- - ------- --_- -* *-------- - - - - -- -- [PEDS.] 0 ;...--- ...... 617 0 850 0 (PEDS.] i 0 , .. I 95 EAST SIDE ; r _ . .... ' Ti4e«Code ELLEP• / :. CLEARY PAL!( BEACH-'COVNTT TRAFFIC PAGE : t :-W Stfeet: NORTHLAKE BL FILE: TEMP -1 I -S Street: MC ALITHUR $l IEATm . CLEAR Movements In Fri4ary DATE: 1/19195 •-------- •----------------- - - - - -- ------------------------------ - - - - -- --- - - - - -, ---------------------------------------- ••--- - - - - -- / ce Free North Free East From South Froe Wtst Vehicle )egin - - - - ------ RT _----- THRU LT - - - - -- ------------------------------------------------ RT THRU 17 RT THRU LT - - RT - --- -- THRU LT Total - - - - -- - - - - -- i------------ ,1:30 55 13 .3 6 336 dl 2 5--------- .8 ------- • • 37- 995-- !1:45 43 4 10 11 358 26 13 6 39 55 352 37 959 iR TOTAL 103 17 13 17 744 67 17 3 97 100 697 74 1954 !2,04 PA .0 16 10 11 442 61 9 9 47 60 3911 42 1150 :2:15 54 11 9 15 424 48 21 7 56 60 337 54 1146 )AY TOTAL 207 44 32 d3 1610 176 47 24 200 220 1477 170 4 25 0 PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 11=30 AK = 12:50 FM PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC ite Code EVER I PATANE PAGE: 1 -W Street; NORTHLAKE BL FILE: TEMP -2 -S Street:: MC AUTHUR SL FATHER: : WAR 1Sovemeuts hy: Prieary DATE: 11191195 tar From North . Frog East From SoL•th Frod West vehicle e; in RT THRU LT RT THRU 17 R1. THRU LT RT THRU LT Total 3:45 53 t ° 23 377 3s 6 i0 34 38 390 73 1060 5:00 Ph 52 6 22 30 522 3! 15 6 31 ;7 360 70 1102 5 :15 76: 8 14 24 540 27 7 1 10 31 29 362 yi 1225 5 :30 67 3 16 22 467 36 4 9 37 37 366 99 1168 AY TOTAL 218 26 6C 104 1906 133 32 35 133 141 1434 333 4635 h9mF,�zc'r,o-j, 71 / — PEAK PERIOD ANALYSIS FOR THE PERIOD: 4:45 PM 5:45 PM S DIRECTION START PEAK HR VOLUMES .•.,.... ...'. PERCENTS .•• FROM PEAK FOUR; FACTOR Right Thru Loft Total Ri91st Thru left North 4:45 PM 0.85 248 26 60 334 74 8 t8 East 4:45 PM : 0.91 104 -1906 133 2143 5 89 6 1 SE04 4:45 PM ` 0.96 32 35 133 200 16 18 66 West 4:45 PM : 9.98 141 1484 333 16959 7 76 IT Entire Intersettio; North 4:45 PIS ' 0.95 24B 26 60 334 74 B )8 East 0.91 104 :906 133 2143 5 89 6 South x•96 32 35 133- ;;00 i6 16 66 We;t 1.cB ldl Ind 3311 195g 7 71 .• PALM PEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC: EtJGINEEF.'INC. VOLUME PEroRT VOl Ume PePOr•t with 24 Hour Totals Fa•:Ie 1 JF k X- dF# aF aF •YF ?E �E• �• �E••iE 7E if # # •X'-0F •iF aF dE,4 +i• iF •�# #•it yk aF if• •fE # •b •tl• �• sr # � s ii• •! 9(• •1F •iF #?t •!F #•1�iE iF iE •)t :t •st• -ft it •)F •cr dE• •JI• � •Kr af• tF %a!• •iF;F 1FdF •iF # �F iF •�•!!• tF Data File DO1 12'007. PRN S t a t i o n : C) C) 0 0 () 0 Q0-2-2Z97 Identification iigoni)ti(,)c.)002C1 Interval 15 - minutes Start date - .Jar, 1^_, 95 Starr time (') 9 15 Stoy, date Jan 1Z, 95 Stop time 09:1° C:it•y /Town SDC County P - R•. COUNTY Lac -- tion : NORTHLAKE PL 5007 W OF I -:+5 ENTR-ANC:E : 4f�!- �FiE' iF�f•' t�t�• iF• f!••I FiF•7 FiF# iF• 1F�i•• iE�t* iF#' 1F• kll �tikk##• ltiFl k+ �F#, Y•• 7FaEi�• 7f• iFiF•1 EiFiF�EiF�EiE•1 FiE', E'„'•• M• �I• ibjF-! F# �•## il• •JF+k•ltiF3.1F9F•!�••eFiF+iiFr. Jar, 12 /Jan 13 Eastbof-Urvd Volume far Lane 2 _----- - - - - -- •------------------------------------- E r, cl T i me 00 01 02 05 06 07 ira 1 0 11 _ - -1` —`i - -7w - - - - - =1S at - 20. iE ' ' 2 447 325 2181 ',7 9 t 1O 405. .1,4 15 6 -'7 =C� 108 ._.c18 436 357 1 .357 1 tt 7�• 26d =�61 414 - 7 17 id 1':: 1�. 2- 61 191 420 3 ;� -. �� 1: .� -= 1 � 414 - - Hr Total 135 .61 56 417 - -67 195 - '5- � 1-411 1515 1--o 34 ' s . 1:1._:t 1._ 1538 • ----------------- End Time 1= 13 14 1 16 17 - - -- i - cc - - --1 d --- `� -_- _ -- -_ -^ - - -- - - - -__- -_- - -__- - - -- E 1 2.2 c•1 -- 15 3'+3 412 •3,E+3 7,94 410 455 409 3+1a1. 211 181 110 78. 30 416 390 368 3 7 S 11 e 43 3 9 7.08 179 178 102 55 45 417 3 - 7 424 43:3 416 426 355 ?E.•S 188. 1 7° 5 4 C �C 377 ZS4 . ._ s o 451 405 454 :11 x:.7••8 177 132 82 5S Hr 'rota 1 -16Q:1 1'5-9 Z 15Z,5 i 65E• 1(--.49 1763 1464 1 151 755 62d 369 -145 --------------------- d Hour Total 2:'c:4A- AM r,c_.al; ho,_tr begi -n-- 07'45 AM peak volUffle : 1717 Peak hoer factor o.96 PM peak, hour- begins 17:00 PM peak volume . 17-68 Peak hour factor 0.97 •� �•.� aF -n• �•ks•x� �,•.k•`•� a. •� •■:•#+f n•-�c � •ft •[••,E•x• �•+E•kdE �• �'�E # iE y-dt• �� iE9E# #�EiE•��'aFac #•� �• � � �� � �:E� �,t,� •� � •�•t�•+E •x• ac•aF•er aF.K..,taF•� aE it Jar, 12 /3ars. 1 Volume for Lane 2 -- -------- - - - - -- - -•- - - - - -- -------------------------- End 'Time CIO t�1 02 0.3 04 05 i6 07 s71. ci'ri 10 11 15 4° 17 :1 17 - -M - -'?0 67 210 '01 5 �,'!i - 0 27 :17 17 g ?5 9-D 287 36.6 279 3122 3 d5 3._, 19 1 h 15 :i4 15�� L95 34ci .'.7f 2 36? ,l Cs 17 _2 9 1'2 21 67 1-68 3144 Z,718 297 3,C�c1 412 - -- - - - -- - - -- - -- - - -- - - -- ; - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - -- - - - -- - - -- - - -- Hr Total 122 7 5 6^ 44 5 -1 16•6 48. 3 1266 1.3-49 213:3 123 _ 1495 End Time 1'2 17 11 15- ----------------------- . -1�. - 1, -- .1_- - - -l.� ----- `'---- `i - - - -`` - - -" 15 l - 1 d0d. :78 :�� =+5 d :~d d45 --- -304 ^•222 21.2 153 - --- 4 1- 44 - 44S. 49: ::7'a :�07 1'97 : i'a 1- l 76 .t5 457 1 i2 389 dd 2 471 523 91 271 1:_ 8 152 60 _ ,122 13-+ 179 46 r- 21 1 200 1A-5 :�a k7 Hr- Total 1F+'a1 15 =' 15':0 1697 179•3 19 7 1567 iQ+•- -(.17 7 29 --------------------------- - - - - -- - -1 'r, o u r Total, 226-j-:. P -M real; hour- begins : 11:'n SAM *Peal -: volume : 161? Peak hour• factor P,4 Peak Nour t.e.jlr,T : 16.:dS PM' p ea6 v,:)t,.,ne - Peav: hour- f'actov- i > -' ?5 •: • s* �• ��x��} �#• ��ata����• a�•:•��x.xas�ss.y.�•�x•��t -i- sit- �- ���- �• �• a.• �• x•�••��.,�••:•,�••�sa,- ,��x�ca� ka- ,���•s�ae•r+t�• *� +��• 9 EXHIBIT CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCI Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19. 1908 Subject/Agenda Item: Consideration of Approval: Petition SP- 97 -01, by Henry Skokowski, agent for Northlake Partners, is requesting a Site Plan approval for a proposed 91,063 square foot shopping center to be named NorthMil Plaza. The proposed center will be anchored by an "Albertson's" supermarket and will contain three "out - parcels" for future development. The shopping center is to be located on a 11.5 acre parcel with a CG -1 General Commercial zoning designation. The parcel is generally located at the northeast comer of Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard (13- 42S -42E). Recommendation/Motion: Staff recommends approval of Resolution 2, 1998, with twenty (20) conditions of approval. _ Reviewed by: Originating Dept: Costs: $ 0 Council Action: Total City Attorney I Growth Management Finance N/A ACM . Human Res. N/A Other N/A . $ 0 Current FY Advertised: Funding Source: Date: [ ] Operating Paper: [ ] Other N/A [ ] Approved [ ] Approved wJ=xot m [ ] Denied [ ] Continued to: Attachments: Resolution 2, 1998 Site Plan Landscape Plan Map: Site Area Narrative: Revisions Memos: City Manager, Building Official, City Engineer, City Forester, Seacoast Director, Fire Dept., Police Dept. Sound Study Report Letter: Albertson's Letters: Homeowner Submitted by: [ x ] Not Required Growth Management Affected parties Budget Acct #:: Director Approved by: [ ]Notified j ] None City Manager [ x ] Not required Agenda Cover Memorandum Page 2 BACKGROUND: Location, Zoning. and sand Use Date: February 19, 1998. Henry Skokowski, agent for Northlake Partners, is requesting a Site Plan approval for a proposed retail center to be named NorthMil Plaza. The 11.5 acre site has a zoning designation of CG -1 General Commercial. The Comprehensive Plan land use designation is Commercial. The site is bounded on the north by the Palm Beach Square residential subdivision with an RL -1 Low Residential zoning designation; to the east by the Palm Beach Square residential subdivision with an RL -1 Low Residential zoning designation and commercial retail with a CG -1 General Commercial' zoning designation; to the south by commercial retail with a Palm Beach Gardens zoning designation of CG -1 General Commercial and commercial retail with Palm Beach County zoning designation CN Neighborhood Commercial; to the west by commercial retail with CG -1 General Commercial designation. The subject site is bounded by Military Trail on the west and Northlake Boulevard to the south. The proposed center will be anchored by a 50,157 square foot Albertson's Supermarket. The center will also contain 28,306 square feet of additional retail space. The shopping center will also contain three (3) outparcels. The two parcels along Military Trail are 0.77 acres and 0.59 acres in size and the outparcel along Northlake Boulevard will contain a 3500 square foot drive -thru restaurant. The outparcels are intended to be developed at a later date as a restaurant without a drive thru, a financial institution with a drive thru or a retail building.. The total area for the main center and the three outparcels will be 91,063 square feet. Zoning: CG -1 I Building Site Area Required/Allowed Minimum Site Area of 1 acre 1 Provided 11.5 acre 1 Compliance yes Building Site Width Minimum 100 feet 175 feet yes Building Lot Coverage Maximum of 35% 18.1% yes Height Limit Maximum 36 feet 36 feet yes Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19, 1998. Page 3 Front 50 feet 477 feet yes :: ;:: •: v���,:.....::i.. ;•::. . :.:• : ::: : ::::::.........1.•�Y, is }:. }:.:i................ v:: C. }::i Y. „vv :. ...::: :.::::: :.:: n..: ;•:.: Side 15 feet 51 feet yes Side Facing Street 40 feet 152 feet yes Rear 15 feet 66 feet yes ......:......... Required Number 393 (Disabled 8) 393 (Disabled 8) yes Stall Size 10 feet by 18.5 feet 10 feet by 2b feet yes :. ::. : :.{.{:Y,..:.;hv r...{.:v }:• } }L;:• :.:: .'?.I.v:.Y:: }i. } ?m:: Y: }:: LLL <.. :...:•::•:.Y:h:. ��w/ f :n v ..... n.v:::::: • .::......::.v:.v. {...... x::::: n... :•.nv:::: w:::'::.;•Y i•Y } }:i;.iv . n•: ii::>:• Y: •YYi:.:,.hri}.:::t::::::::::•:: . -. vv } } }Y•i::e::: r .:: .. n.: .. , r:n ..... ........... :.... ..v... v;. }v: w:::; :•::• ::::::. w::.w;: :..: .f... x::::n iti�ir:{•}.v :::: ,•.•:h ?r:.:•Y ....:. ... :.vei ?:•ii:• } }arr .::ir'?iY •+i: �1::::r. : >.•: .. r. ?• ::Y'l ?v,4:'• }'• } } }: i:. :i; rY..4 :. . :: ::. : .... ..Fix• {.•: � Yi:tt:rih,.. ..Yywr. ?.. }.v �..- ::::.:� :::::::::::.. r..::: f.•.v: ::: x. r..v.. r..:::vv }::: }.4...i:.v:::::::v.:v:: ......... n....... .. :::::: nv ::::::: ?v :. :.:.:.v:::::::::• :: , .:.::.:::..... r::::.::...........::...::.::. .::::: :.}:r.'.<i};.}Y }:L: ? { {:. }::•: :; r ...::.: :::.v::...::.... :.?Y:Ltivv..v:.v:::. x...... ' �..:::: :::•rn:.:�:::r•::::.::•:: :::.Y: ............... . Fi:.v • ✓,.}v- ;:,;.. v.. : 4. :.... v... :< Y .: x4.. $} ... ... ' •. :.L2.:r.•+.+� Pmt., g:::... :..i ?..;•..r.: :3,i } /, ?;v:w: } +:. ........................ ......::....................III Points 14,027 15,346 yes Landscaped Buffers Front 15 feet 15 feet yes Side 15 feet 15 feet yes � t. � � F� - .. ..... .. �L .....•.. ......... ...... {. ........ ......... Side on R.O.W. 15 feet 15 feet yes Rear 8 feet 8 feet yes Parking Areas Every parking stall Every parking stall yes within 40 feet of tree within 40 feet of tree Preservation Section 98 -1 intent One (1) Banyan tree yes preserved, 24 +/- Sable Palms Ground Signs 1,380 feet of R.O.W.= two ground signs yes two (2) ground signs Setbacks 15 feet front property 15 feet yes line; Greater than 50 feet 50 feet from side property line Dimensions length =15 feet max. length= 15 feet max. yes height--10 feet max. height-- 10 feet max. Area =60 square feet Area =27.4 square feet max. max. Agenda Cover Memorandum Page 4 Wall Signs I 1 per tenant elevation facing a R.O.W. Color Sec. 110- 37(c): °AII signs shall be of uniform type, color and material Lighting Sec. 118474 (4) Minimum 0.6 footcandles in outdoor areas, 1.0 footcandles in vehicle use area Buildina and Materials Date: February 19, 1998. 1 per tenant elevation facing a R.O.W. All letters to be fabricated aluminum channel letters with blue acrylic faces and internally illuminated with white neon tubing. Average footcandle in Parking area = 3.78fc Max. off site= .13 fc yes yes yes The main retail center will contain 78,463 square feet, including the Albertson's supermarket and other retail spaces. This building will have a maximum facade height of 36 feet. The west and south facing elevation will have a "light beige 1065" stucco exterior for the main facade with "white 869" raised stucco banding along the top of the parapet and below the tenant sign facade. The covered walkway will be supported by columns running the length of the front retail area. The two (2) foot concrete columns will have a "light beige 1065" stucco exterior with a one (1) foot base with "Dark beige 1291" color six inch "light beige 1065" banding just above. The top of the column will have a "white 869" colored band. The interior of the covered walkway will have a "dark beige 1291" stucco finish. The aluminum storefront frames will be colored "white 869." The main facade will feature circular architectural accents two (2) feet in diameter and colored "1219 dark beige." The roof facade will consist of a barrel tile roof with a four (4) color blend mix of terra cotta and grey color schemes. The rear facing elevations will consist of "light beige 1065" exterior walls with a stucco finish. There will also be several "white 869" aluminum "down spouts" running vertically down the exterior walls. Rooftop equipment will be screened with an extension of the stucco wall, which will run the length of the rear facing elevations. Sianaae ,t. Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19, 1998. Page 5 Signage at NorthMil Plaza will consist of two monument ground signs and wall signs (one (1) per tenant) on the main retail center. The Albertson's supermarket store sign will have # 3630 -167 medium blue and #3630 -36 dark blue lettering with white outlines. All other tenant signs will have blue acrylic faced lettering. All signs will consist of metal channel letters with bronze trim caps. The two identical monument ground signs will consist of an aluminum sign cabinet with a "beige #1219" smooth stucco finish. Both signs will have the words " Albertson's" and "NorthMil Plaza" on their copy area, with space allowing for one other tenant name. The sign base will be covered with 12" x 12" ceramic tiles, the top row being "dark beige 1219" and the bottom two rows " light beige 1219." The lettering for " Albertson's" will include an internally illuminated #732 white plexiglass letter faces with #3630 -167 medium blue and #3630 -36 dark blue vinyl overlay. The lettering for "NorthMil Plaza" will include internally illuminated sans -serif style letters with a #7328 white plexiglass letter faces with #3630 -36 dark blue vinyl overlay. Jack Hanson has recommended approval for all signage for the site. Parking The number of required spaces for the proposed 78,463 square foot main retail building is 393. The petitioner is proposing 393 spaces. The number of parking required for the main retail building was calculated by the petitioner using the "Shopping Center" classification found in the Land Development Regulations. This standard requires one space per 200 square feet of gross floor area, excluding theaters. Parking standards using the "Restaurant" criteria, however, require one space for each three seats plus one space per employee on the shift of greatest employment. Staff is recommending that this criteria be applied to any free standing restaurant constructed in any one of the three outparcels to help alleviate parking space shortages in the future. Landscaping The petitioner has provided 15,346 points of landscaping. The Code requires 14,027 points of landscaping. The petitioner has provided 15 -foot landscaped buffers along public right -of -ways and all other property boundaries in accordance with the Code. The petitioner has also met the requirement that all parking spaces on site will be within 40 feet of a tree. The petitioner has met the intent of the Code by preserving one (1) strangler fig tree and 24 +/- sabal palms. In response to comments by the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee, the landscape plan was revised to indicate column locations along the promenade and five (5) Sabal palms along the northern elevation of the Albertson's. In addition, the landscape Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19, 1998. Page 6 plan has been revised to show an increase from 12 foot to 14 -16 foot trees along the residential perimeter. The tree spread has been increased to 20 -25 feet and the caliper increased from 5" to 51/2." Traffic Conditional traffic concurrency was determined by Assistant City Engineer Lynnette Lanning in her memo dated October 23, 1996. Traffic concurrency was conditioned upon the buildout date being no later than December 31, 1999. The site plan includes dimensions for the right turn lanes and right -of -way dedications on Military Trail. Drainaae The petitioner has submitted a drainage statement which determined that legal positive outfall will be achieved by using a "weir bleeder system which will connect to the existing inlet located at the northeast comer of the site." In her October 23, 1996 memo, Assistant City Engineer Lynette Lanni ng granted conditional drainage concurrency based on whether or not the proposed outfall system can meet the City's performance standards. The petitioner has also responded to site plan committee questions regarding wet retention water treatment. The treatment used will be a combination of dry pre- treatment through exfiltration trenches and the use of pollutant baffles at the drainage inlets throughout the site. The City Engineer had a concern that the 40- year -old drainage outfall system (existing on- site inlet and piping) may have deteriorated to the point where it would inadequately drain the developed site. The petitioner's engineer proposed that the development of the site would actually decrease the volume of runoff into the outfall system. As requested by the City Engineer, the petitioner submitted a videotaped surveillance of the outfall system to verify its integrity. In addition, the petitioner submitted detailed drainage calculations to verify that the volume of water flowing through the outfall system would decrease as a. result of site development. Assistant City Engineer Tammy Jacobs has indicated that the drainage pipe appears in good condition. However, she does note that there is tree root infestation in an existing catch basin on the site. She is recommending that this be cleared and any structural damage repaired. Lighting The petitioner has submitted a photometric site plan showing the distribution of lighting foot candles. The highest foot candle reading in the adjacent residential area is .13 foot ,l tltN Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19, 1998. Page 7 candles, below the minimum .6 foot candle required on site. The highest on -site foot candle reading is 9.77 fc, located on the drive -aisle directly in front of the main retail building (west elevation). The lowest foot candle reading is 0, located along the eastern boundary, behind the main retail plaza. The code requires that there be an average foot candle reading of 0.6 for general parking and pedestrian area and 1.0 in the vehicle use area only. For this site, the average foot candle readings are 4.36 fc for the drive aisles, and 3.78 fc for the parking areas. The average foot candle figures exceed the minimum required by code. Ms. Jacobs has signed off on the revised lighting plan in her memo dated August 12, 1997. Staff has a concern that the 30 foot high parking lot light poles are too high due to the adjacent residential area. The petitioner has responded to these concerns by lowering the light poles along the northern and eastern boundaries to 20 feet. Other Issue$ The surrounding residents in the "Palm Beach Square', residential subdivision have expressed concerns about the necessity of the development proposed for the property adjacent to them. The petitioner has held several meetings with area residents concerning this project. A neighboring City resident, Linda Peters of 1016 Woodfield Circle, has expressed a concern for the necessity of an additional retail plaza in this vicinity (see attached). Linda Garcia, another neighboring resident also expresses her concern about additional commercial development along Northlake Boulevard (see attached). Other concerns by residents and property owners, expressed at the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee, included: Further congestion reducing access to Military Trail at Arbor Way and Northlake Boulevard at Keating Drive. 2. The addition of a high traffic volume curb -cut along Military Trail and its interaction with the existing sidewalk (utilized daily by Grove Park Elementary schoolchildren). 3. Safety concerns regarding the large wet retention area located on the eastern end of the site. 4. Noise associated with loading activities in the rear of the shopping plaza. 5. Easy accessability to neighboring homes from the proposed development (regarding criminal activity). 6. Overall intensity of commercial density along Northlake Boulevard is having a detrimental effect on nearby City residential neighborhoods. ss��4rt�f� Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19,1998. Page 8 7. The adjacent commercial property owner on Northlake Boulevard has expressed concern to staff that the site's easternmost ingress along Northlake Boulevard is too close to their westernmost egress and this could be a potential traffic hazard. The conversion of the site's easternmost ingress /egress to a westbound egress -only situation would alleviate the property owner's concern. Staff Comment$ Planning and Zoning As of the last City Council meeting, several issues were still of serious concern to Staff. They are as follows: (1) Tree Preservation: Staff has a concern that the petitioner has not made every effort to meet the intent of Section 98 -1 of the landscape code, which requires the preservation of trees. The petitioner has proposed the preservation of (1) one strangler fig and the relocation on site . of +/- 24 sabal palm trees. The City Forester has commented, however, that the petitioner has not done everything possible to prevent the removal of an old growth stand of slash pine trees in the northeast corner of the site (see attached memo). City Forester Mark Hendrickson has reviewed the petition and has commented in his memo dated December 2, 1997 (see attached exhibit). The following is a summary of his concerns: (1) Additional landscaping should be added to the Northlake medians (2) Additional space is needed for the strangler fig preservation, especially now that the Boston Market is no longer proposed. (3) Additional tree preservation could be managed on site, particularly the stand of old pine trees at the northeast comer of the site. (4) Additional tall plantings could be managed along the front of the retail plaza to create a more unified effect. The petitioner has addressed the concern regarding the conflict between the conceptual drainage plan and the preserved strangler fig. The Site Plan Appearance and Review Committee did not recommend conditions of Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19, 1998. Page 9 approval based on the City Forester's comments. Optimally, staff would like to see some of Mr. Hendrickson's concerns addressed by way of a condition(s) of approval. (2) Noise and Associated Nuisances: Staff had a concern that loading and unloading activities may be disruptive to neighboring residents due to their close proximity to the rear of shopping center and that this activity will exceed the decibel levels permitted in Section 118 -299, Performance Standards. City staff conducted a preliminary noise study at a comparable Albertson's site on Indiantown Road in Jupiter. The results of the study indicate that noise levels produced by on -site activity at a distance equivalent to the adjacent homes at NorthMil site exceed the maximum decibel levels allowed by the City's performance standards. City staff hired an independent acoustical engineer to conduct a sound study using data from both the subject site and the test site at Indiantown Road. The City's engineering consultant has reached the following conclusion: The initial reading from the test site indicated LEQ (average) readings of 59.2 dB, in excess of the code maximum of 55 dB. However, this reading was in absence of any type of noise barrier or operational mitigation. The City's consulting engineer agreed that the noise level readings could be reduced to below the maximum daytime levels required through additional physical improvements to the site including: a. The installation of an eight (8) foot wall along portions of the east and north property lines b. Enclosure of the loading area truck well C. The installation of two (2) foot high sound absorption material as described in the site plan dated January 6, 1998 along the eight foot wall d. The installation of pavement markings and signage along the eastern and northern drive aisles prohibiting the idling of delivery vehicles. The petitioner has made the necessary revisions to the site plan to achieve the recommended mitigation. In addition to these improvements, staff is recommending the following conditions of approval to mitigate excessive noise levels: (a) All deliveries shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. (b) All refrigerated trucks shall be required to switch off refrigeration equipment while on site. (c) All vehicles shall be prohibited from stopping or standing with engines idling on the Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19, 1998. Page 10 north and east sides of the shopping center. (d) The petitioner will agree to limit garbage collection to the hours between 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, to the best ability of the City's waste collector, Waste Management, Inc. (e) Design and Operation of the property shall be conducted in such a manner so as to avoid pure tones and impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and east property lines, and mechanical and electrical equipment selected for the project shall not emit pure tones or impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and east property lines. The City's Sound Consultant, Fernando Levi of Levi Engineering Corporation, has signed off on the petitioner's sound mitigation plan. (3) Parking Staff feels that calculating parking for future "stand alone" restaurants utilizing the shopping center criteria will not provide for adequate parking on the site, particularly if additional restaurants open in the shopping center. To properly address this concern, staff is recommending the following condition of approval: (1) When the "future development areas" designated for restaurants are developed, the parking calculations shall be based on the "Restaurant and Grill" criteria as defined in Section 118 -476 of the City's LDRs. (4) Pedestrian Safety Planning and Zoning staff, neighborhood residents, and the Police Department have expressed concern over pedestrian safety. Police Sergeant Jay Spencer has responded to neighborhood concerns about pedestrian/vehicular conflicts, particularly at the proposed Military Trail exit. Neighbors are concerned because this segment of Military Trail sidewalk is used by children attending the Grove Park School. The Police Department has documented evidence of accidents involving pedestrians at a similar exit onto Military Trail at Gardens Park Plaza. To address these concerns, the Police Department is recommending the relocation of the crosswalk at the Military Trail access road from adjacent to Military Trail to a point midway between Military Trail and the parking lot. Also, brick pavers should be utilized at the crosswalk point to emphasize the pedestrian crossing area (this method was applied at Promenade Plaza). Sgt. Spencer also recommends school crossing signage to caution drivers exiting the shopping center at the crosswalk point (see attached). Thick vegetation and/or decorative barricades should also be utilized to prevent pedestrians from crossing where there is no designated crosswalk. This design Agenda Cover Memorandum Date: February 19, 1998. Page 11 has been endorsed by the Florida chapter of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CEPTED). The petitioner has responded to these concerns by proposing a similar configuration to what was suggested by the Police Department and the Planning and Zoning staff, as shown in the January 6, 1998 site plan. The Police Department feels that this configuration sufficiently addresses their concern. In addition, staff is recommending the following conditions of approval be added to protect pedestrians utilizing the Military Trail sidewalk during the time of construction of the shopping center: (1) Any modifications to the sidewalk on Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard shall be done on an after -hours basis so as not to interrupt continuous pedestrian use of those sidewalks during the day. (2) The speed hump shall be indicated on the construction plans to be extended across both ingress and egress travel lanes prior to construction plan approval. Engineering Assistant City Engineer Tammy Jacobs has reviewed the petition and notes in her December 17, 1997 memo that all issues are satisfied or conditionally satisfied with the exception of the entry design at the Military Trail entry drive (see attached comments, issue #11). Ms. Jacobs has indicated her satisfaction with the recommended condition of approval regarding the speed hump. Building Building Official Jack Hanson has examined the drawings and documents regarding signage and recommends approval of both the project identification signs and the wall sign criteria. He endorses the tenant sign guide lines as presented (see attached exhibit). Police See "pedestrian safety" Fire Department No further concerns at this time. Seacoast Utilities Agenda Cover Memorandum Page 12 No further concerns at this time. Date: February 19, 1998. At its September 2, 1997 meeting, the Site Plan and Appearance Review Committee recommended approval by a 4 -3 vote with the condition below. The dissenting members indicated their concerns with the outstanding safety issues and whether a new shopping center was needed. Staff recommended denial of the petition to the Committee. The Committee recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall dedicate the 10 feet of right of way along Military Trail to the FDOT prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. 2. The applicant shall dedicate the six feet of additional right of way along Northlake Boulevard to Palm Beach County prior to the issuance of the first building permit. 3. The applicant shall provide detailed design calculations for onsite drainage improvements as well as possible outfall improvements before construction plan approval. 4. The applicant shall. submit a boundary plat, suitable for recording, for review and approval by the City Council before the issuance of the building permit. 5. When the Future Development Area #1 and Future Development Area #2 are constructed, the vehicular access for each parcel shall be limited to the internal north -south drive aisle. 6. Any modifications to the sidewalk on Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard be done on an after -hours basis so as not to interrupt continuous pedestrian use of those sidewalks during the day. Recommendation Staff has attempted to identify and address all the concerns related to the construction of this project. Because the applicant has met all staffs requests, with the exception of a complete site redesign, and addressed staffs concerns through agreeing to the attached conditions, the proposed project meets all applicable City Codes. Because this project site has existing Commercial zoning and land use, and because the project meets all applicable City codes staff must recommend approval of this project with the following conditions: (1) The applicant shall dedicate the ten (10) feet of R.O.W. along Military Trail to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. (Building Division, Development Compliance Officer) Agenda Cover Memorandum Page 13 Date: February 19, 1998. (2) The applicant shall dedicate the 6 feet of additional right of way along Northlake Boulevard to Palm Beach County prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. (Building Division, Development Compliance Officer) (3) The applicant shall provide detailed design calculations for onsite drainage improvements as well as possible outfall improvements before construction plan approval. (City Engineer, Building Division) (4) The applicant shall submit a boundary plat, suitable for recording, for review and approval by the City Council before the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. (City Engineer) (5) When the "Future Development Area # 1" and "Future Development Area #2" are constructed, the vehicular access for each parcel shall be limited to the internal north -south drive aisle. (City Engineer, Planning and Zoning Division) (6) Prior to Construction Plan approval of the "Typical Exfiltration Trench Detail" and data in Exhibit "c" shall be reconciled. (City Engineer, Development Compliance Officer) (7) The existing drainage inlet (catch basin number 5) shall be replaced with a new inlet or properly cleaned of tree roots and any structural drainage repaired prior to certification of occupancy. (City Engineer) (8) Any modifications to the sidewalk on Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard be done on an after -hours basis so as not to interrupt continuous pedestrian use of those sidewalks during the day.(Building Division, Development Compliance Officer) (9) The applicant shall secure a permit from F.D.O.T. for the sidewalk to be placed outside the Military Trail R.O.W. prior to construction plan approval. (Development Compliance Officer, City Engineer) (10) The Boundary Plat shall convey public access to the sidewalk to be placed outside the Military Trail R.O.W. prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. (Development Compliance Officer, City Engineer) . (11) The speed hump shall be indicated on the construction plans to be extended across both ingress and egress travel lanes prior to construction plan approval. (City Engineer) (12) All deliveries shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. (Development Compliance Officer, Code Enforcement) r� 3 Agenda Cover Memorandum Page 14 Date: February 19, 1998. (13) All refrigerated trucks shall be required to switch off refrigeration equipment while on site. (Development Compliance Officer, Code Enforcement) (14) All vehicles shall be prohibited from stopping or standing with engines idling on the north and east sides of the shopping center. (Code Enforcement, Development Compliance Officer) (15) The petitioner will agree to limit garbage collection to the hours between 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, to the best ability of the City's waste collector, Waste Management, Inc. (Code Enforcement, Development Compliance Officer). (16) Design and Operation of the property shall be conducted in such a manner so as to avoid pure tones and impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and east property lines, and mechanical and electrical equipment selected for the project shall not emit pure tones or impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and east property lines. (Code Enforcement, Building Department) (17) When the "future development areas" are developed, the parking calculations shall be based on the criteria as defined in Section 118 -476 of the City's LDRs for each individual use. (Planning and Zoning Division) (18) All shopping center signage shall be internally - illuminated blue acrylic -faced lettering. (19) The applicant shall provide, at their own expense, a crossing guard certified by the City of Palm Beach Gardens Police Department at the shopping center's Military Trail entrance crosswalk during the morning and afternoon school hours, as designated for the Grove Park Elementary School zone. (20) Within thirty (30) days of site plan approval, the petitioner shall amend all applicable plans to reflect the proposed "chevron" monument sign on the north side of the Military Trail entrance. \eat G: \Short Range \SP9701.ST3.wpd RESOLUTION 2,1998 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 91,063 SQUARE FOOT SHOPPING CENTER TO BE NAMED NORTHMIL PLAZA AND LOCATED ON AN 11.6 ACRE PARCEL AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF MILITARY TRAIL AND NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the petitioner, Northlake Partners, is requesting site plan approval for the construction of a 91,063 square foot shopping center to be named Northmil Plaza and located on an 11.6 acre parcel at the northeast corner of Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard; WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the proposed petition is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: Section 1. The City Council hereby approves the site plan for a 91,063 square foot shopping center to be named Northmil Plaza and located on an 11.6 acre parcel at the northeast comer of Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard, as described in attachment "A ", which is incorporated as part of this resolution. Section 2. Said construction shall be in accordance with plans on file with the City's Planning and Zoning Division as follows: 1. January 6, 1998 Site Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 2. January 6, 1998 Landscape Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 3. December 12, 1997 Detail Sheet, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 4. January 6, 1998 Landscape Details, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 5. July 3, 1997 Military Trail Landscape Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 6. October 9, 1997 Architectural Elevations, Ted Davis and Associates, Sheet A -1 7. August 19, 1997 Architectural Elevations, Ted Davis and Associates, Sheet A -2 8. January 6, 1998 Architectural Elevations, Ted Davis and Associates, Sheet A -3 9. January 27, 1997 Architectural Elevations, Ted Davis and Associates, Sheets A-4 and A -5 10. October 10, 1997 Sign Details, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 11. December 12, 1997 Lighting Plan and Notes, Urban Design Studio, I Sheet 12. December 21, 1997 Conceptual Drainage Plan, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet 13. February 11, 1998 NorthMil Plaza Sign Relocation, Urban Design Studio, 1 Sheet Section 3. Approval is based on the following conditions of being met: (1) The applicant shall dedicate the ten (10) feet of R.O.W. along Military Trail to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. (Building Division, Development Compliance Officer) (2) The applicant shall dedicate the 6 feet of additional right of way along Northlake Boulevard to Palm Beach County prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. (Building Division, Development Compliance Officer) (3) The applicant shall provide detailed design calculations for onsite drainage improvements as well as possible outfall improvements before construction plan approval. (City Engineer, Building Division) (4) The applicant shall submit a boundary plat, suitable for recording, for review and approval by the City Council before the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. (City Engineer) (5) When the "Future Development Area # 1" and "Future Development Area #2" are constructed, the vehicular access for each parcel shall be limited to the internal north -south drive aisle. (City Engineer, Planning and Zoning Division) (6) Prior to Construction Plan approval of the "Typical Exfiltration Trench Detail" and data in Exhibit "c" shall be reconciled. (City Engineer, Development Compliance Officer) (7) The existing drainage inlet (catch basin number 5) shall be replaced with a new inlet or properly cleaned of tree roots and any structural drainage repaired prior to certification of occupancy. (City Engineer) (8) Any modifications to the sidewalk on Military Trail and Northlake Boulevard shall be done on an after -hours basis so as not to interrupt continuous pedestrian use of those sidewalks during the day.(Building Division, Development Compliance Officer) (9) The applicant shall secure a permit from F.D.O.T. for the sidewalk to be placed outside the Military Trail R.O.W. prior to construction plan approval. (Development Compliance Officer, City Engineer) (10) The Boundary Plat shall convey public access to the sidewalk to be placed outside the Resolution 2, 1998 Page 2 Military Trail R.O.W. prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. (Development Compliance Officer, City Engineer) (11) The speed hump shall be indicated on the construction plans to be extended across both ingress and egress travel lanes prior to construction plan approval. (City Engineer) (12) All deliveries shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. (Development Compliance Officer, Code Enforcement) (13) All refrigerated trucks shall be required to switch off refrigeration equipment while on site. (Development Compliance Officer, Code Enforcement) (14) All vehicles shall be prohibited from stopping or standing with engines idling on the north and east sides of the shopping center. (Code Enforcement, Development Compliance Officer) (15) The petitioner shall agree to limit garbage collection to the hours between 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday - through Saturday, to the best ability of the City's waste collector, Waste Management, Inc. (Code Enforcement, Development Compliance Officer). (16) Design and operation of all improvements on the property shall be conducted in such a manner so as to avoid pure tones and impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and east property lines, and mechanical and electrical equipment selected for the project shall not emit pure tones or impulsive sounds which are audible at the north and east property lines. (Code Enforcement, Building Department) (17) When the "future development areas" are developed, the parking calculations shall be based on the criteria as defined in Section 118 -476 of the City's LDRs for each outparcel use individually. (Planning and Zoning Division) (18) All shopping center signage shall be internally - illuminated blue acrylic -faced lettering. (19) The applicant shall provide, at their own expense, a crossing guard certified by the City of Palm Beach Gardens Police Department at the shopping center's Military Trail entrance crosswalk during the morning and afternoon school hours, as designated for the Grove Park Elementary School zone. (20) Within thirty (30) days of site plan approval, the petitioner shall amend all applicable plant to reflect the proposed "chevron" monument sign on the north side of the Military Trail entrance. Section 4. This resolution shall be effective upon adoption. Resolution 2, 1998 Page 3 INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS DAY OF FEBRUARY 1998 MAYOR JOSEPH R. RUSSO ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND LINDA V. KOSIER SUFFICIENCY. CITY ATTORNEY VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT MAYOR RUSSO VICE MAYOR FURTADO COUNCILWOMAN MONROE COUNCILMAN JABLIN COUNCILMAN CLARK Resolution ,1998 Page 4 G: \Short Range \SP9701.RE3.wpd EXHIBIT February 12, 1998 Ms. Roxanne Manning Growth Management Director CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS Planning and Zoning Department 10500 N. Military Trait Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410 RE: NORTHMIL PLAZA (PETITION SP- 97 -01) OUR REF #16124.14 Dear Ms. Manning: Urban Design Urban Planning Land Planning Landscape Architecture Communication Graphics The attached Sign Relocations plan is our response to the concerns expressed by the City Council at the February 5`'' meeting. This plan addresses the impact of the free standing sign on the visibility of pedestrians at the Military Trail entrance. This plan offers a relocation of the monument sign to the north side of the. entrance on Military Trail. We have reviewed, as carefully as possible, this amendment and find it to be not only workable and acceptable, but responsive to the concerns of the City Council. Subject to your review and consideration of this revision, we are willing to accept a condition of approval that limits the placement of the monument sign on Military Trail to the north side of the entrance as per the attached drawing dated February 11, 1998. We would npprecinle your review of this nllr.rnme plan ns sntNl as passible and here to get yotlr Department support on this change at the February 19" City Council meeting. Thank you for your assistance in this matter and please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Urban Design Studio Henry Skokowski, AIC Principal sp cc: Jay Spencer Len Lindahl NorthMil Partners Larry Smith Greg Johnson Attachment: Six (6) copies of Sign Relocation plan WNSSIGNMILTRAiL.021298 LCC 35 12K 2000 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard Suite 600 The Concourse West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 -6582 561.689.0066 561.669.0551 fax Irvine, CA 714.489.8131 r .:ii'{'•.;.f >ifii�.• Yti•..,r -.. fii•cv.f7i•.• .•iTu.• afSia,fr(i�rl i. •. .f �Tv..:._iii._; .•...f. .:Ti ��•. •zfsrcii Ti r• •Ti i1 •`Tv'i ur[• u•..i n•..i� ur:�•'. �..- �s . F. �. ►� :..ice ZINN; MA • • r •• Li c , 0 i li► 'F • �fzg 11 AI "MI I� DARK GRFEN DATE: TO: FROM: It h:: CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS Department of Growth Management February 13, 1998 Bobbie Herackovich, City Manager City Council Members Roxanne Manning, Growth Management Director I Petition SP -97 -111: NorfliNlil Plaza Concerns & Itevisiuns EXHIBIT The following concerns were raised at the February' 5, 1998 Council Meeting regarding the NorthMil Plaza petition. These issues have been addressed by staff and the petitioner as follows: (1) A concern was raised regarding the appropriate nature of a Military Trail median cut so close to the intersection with Nortlllake Boulevard. The petitioner stated that the median cut for the shopping center entrance was required by. the City as part of the traffic concurrency review. Staff has on file an application to the State Department of Transportation for. the median cut from the petitioner dated several months before the petitioner applied to the City for traffic concurmicy. Although the City did not require the median cut as part of.the concurrency review, the concurrency was granted based on an analysis which included this median cut. Staff is currently working to determine if additional concurrency review would . be needed should the median cut be deleted from the plan. Staff will have a definitive answer by the next Council meeting. It must also be noted that the right-of-way for Military Trail in this location may not be located within the City's municipal boundaries. Staff is investigating this issue and will have a definitive answer by the next Council meeting. (2) The petitioner has agreed to condition # 19 providing for a crossing guard at the Military Trail entrance crosswalk at the morning and afternoon hours designated for the Grove Park Elementary School zone. (3) The petitioner has addressed the concerns regarding the sight line conflict with the ten (10) foot high sign in the Military Trail entrance median. The petitioner is proposing to replace this sign with a two -sided "chevron" sign in a landscaped area to the north side of the entrance road. (see attached) City Forester Mark Hendrickson and Building Official Jack Hanson have no objections. Staff is recommending condition # 20 which states that "within thirty (30) days of site plan approval, the petitioner shall amend all applicable plans to reflect the proposcd "chevron" nion►►niriil sign on the norll► side of Ilse Military "frail entrance." cc: Greg Dunham G: \Short Range \sp9701.meml.wpd ri V H C 1p4q0 a � Poo v N � N o m a14 P4 a m o 0 o N um a ' � U m mom• m 0 �a00 0 �p0 °° .U4Ogm OU 0 U N � � •i�i N� v� J 0�1 m 'r� L U IVAA bl 41 0 _10 V4N0m ta 44 to N Ub 14 0 NA d a0 ro r4J 41 o M m P 0 m o b a4j vw m A A 4+ +� 4J 0 4J pi W A E }� o to 0 a N }! N r- a►N 010 N .. N .. 4) d! E' 01 •p 0 � O (0 0 b � A 0-4 rd N z b 4 •rq U Vl N U 4) m m -A 2 xb 0 0 L J � � S IN r.� J N a z 4 v G! 0 0 0- A•HAAm 4-J rI y A0 9 44 m �ais0� �rl q� 'O •,� •r1 0 O O �0 �Vmrl U �0� b � v ri �b u U 4xxN �0�00 41 04J • bo3A rt+JOA� >1 0 0 0 b a4j r-4 w 0 43 0 r4 .r4 41 A aa, -A 4 A 43 44 r�H 0 to b to a+ N b+ as �UOrol00 z- xqo 00 H -A V V N O a� A as '� as � HfA � as O a, N b a0 O 5� 00 u 04 CL R ctJ N a a) N w z al U 0 0 A•rq AArf d 4J r-4 4� A df 1 0 b •�+ •� 0 O •mob o0 CC n U o 03 0 b u 0 X�41 ttl , O rl UIVAy14 cLP 4.0 ° 0 7 �4J (A • W0k.0o a a C(z r w0vw T al A rj C .� CIO UL r O 4J 0 4f 'J 44 A A E 0 ..�_ .. 4j to0 . 4) U1 U .. $400030 b V A 0. Nb NHm � U u �Vx47 q•q 0) U dl 0 — 4 IQ A � m 0 O rfF +� b•. 41 so � k 0 41 'Vb O q m V 'O •4g rl 0 v JbV a u �ti a tr 0 PA 4J A 0 oA av L1 a., V m 4' m �0 NOI.O00 ggoo o� p 'a 10P 0M m U w 41 w N -,,.0 4j 41 4+ a a � � a4) "4A.� P 64 V V >1 ° .°o r. •rq Cs- 0 H p 0 w 10 N • • • d—< N U $4 40!90.030 ro 0 k 7+ •n A 8 w •� 4 0 r-4 b b •H 0 �UGrol00 -A a z u cn z= mod m0 H U V� H O a� Po ,, pq r4 a� x� Om b ao O 41 O91 V • a NU4141.. 4J H 4� � m b•�•� m O Ubpm a V m 41 lu �" •� to VH >+'O V �"q uro��m .4 r. In 4 p tO 44 to o 0 b o �•wa QV, POp 0 0 0 0 b 13443 r W •UH�� rq P-4 :J LL dl 4J - 41 O• A W $4 d 0 to : RJ W N +J N r. 03 14 t7l0 Cl N d N d!U •ri > •1 +1 4) a b V A Rororrli0A r-1 b b •rq WO 4) m m •ri a z 4 v cn z= xb08 rq V U N 0 a� D P, 1a "� as � H� x� om o b to o 51 ON vro m a a j .� l d Q �1 z f'a G! N U a z U cn 0)000— r-4 0 M .. R�pOm .r, = a •rq -A 00 U�;1m G 41 0b040'� U 0. rd , 0 x+10 V 4-)0 U�0�W V FA 44 bola °a b � 0 .W p 0 w k b 040r"w Ot v • � � 10, q u rl -PE�� 44 o 0@-+ ONC,O �- a" �Ob�mA Ud00 -A Z xb 00 H u a H ari pa � u a� m e Ole to Iii O Q +' C N um a G1Umm•• 4J H 4J — a om a3 41 41 b• P40O U � o Ole agu�P4 ob u 3 to >q v •� o�+4+om A m 4 vNioNO°' b� CU +J O .W O P4J NH �- M= mu4) O W •� O .� � N. b W.. .. .0 N m N w U $400.000 C�1 b A Q0bmmq r-1 b b •r1 ^� N u w m m �1 P4 z u z= xo q q GlUdl41.. ,, •H A A rf 4J r-I 4� �aaoo br.H03 •�+ •� m o 4+ UtoOgm b0 •� 04J U b p• 4J M b • V u a >b u b�0AO� aV m u D 4 • pqU 41 �41 m E''vl Q a Nw N o O FA 0 �r- pON ab "b AA; b 0 mo ro p roo4'mo A�aV� a aamo `4 V E-0 �+ 6 M ,, V �+ 00 W }� O N G b O Gl Ell UN) U $4 Gl 9 m A m r4 to "q 4j f 0 U 0 q a z b •4 (i U) 4) 41 0 z' xb 0 0 .'1 •rl u u� HC paq � 41 a • a� 41 O 05 um a a� r OJ � m .. � b P4 z sx, c .. •• N U b A A � U � GlUdlm.. .q •� A �7 co 0Om O• 0 0 b•�•�rlmO 14 V �0 •Hb� °o r u m ) O V 040.1 oF4 >1 b 4 U b .0 4j m 4x 41 d �� m '0 0 A w to ••.1 0 10 4J o.W �0 00 to a 41 r-I rd 0= ova U •,4 �'•H .rq 41 4j E4 4J 0 WA 41H ° to : b m 9 03 N b► W 14 0) q m q 0 4 •H > •r1 0 $4 •ri 4 q Ob. -Imq Ol U dl dl dl -ri =xb00 ri U u� H 0 a� p� 0 a �m m b a 00 o 5141 0 00 um m a GlUmm•• ,O •� A A M a•► r-4 0 A Ac0Om m0 • ,j b Ub 0gc°�m� U� - O•rj iv. U r-I u Im m •� b�a w . ma a 4° 4J ma LO 44 to V w v 0 as IV ore m +ANN �I b j �i a, rmi w m � 0 0 44 43 H •� O N b w •• •• N m • N Ul u H N g m q F4) -I b b •ri m m • '.� Gl U Cl rl P4 z u X= w 9 0 0 0 u � Ho au a P4 04 wU E0 x � Om N b b 00 � E 4) *' oa V0 �r 0 X G) 0 0 0.• A •rq A �7 trf 4J r bN P4 0164 b 9 rq $3 •,-I •r1 0 O k0�41 •�+ 10 1 old � �U 0 1 O Ai Uro 0.1 4J 0 01 u uro�+'N f �V 0 N A IA 44 0 a L O O go ,A A �. bo4010 bVO.W0 O >,0 0 O a„ H w a- 0 4A �! A �aurf �• `c 44 � E O N N -.0 '6! 04 0 N U 11G9Ibmmb0 O G) IEI •r♦ 0 •rl 0 V P A Ob.�Imq b b •,1 a 41 U N 0 0 -A P4 z 4 u fn z= wod 00 rq u N O au �04 0 as '� fA � 0 14 tic b ao o 41 00 V 0 a GlU00.. O m I �•�v00 •mob ub s 0coim u °'� a0. v ,A 1' u �• ty, 4J 104 14 43 0 ,4) o a ` m w 0 o N H 0 N O d 10 b 1 10 V o x fJ �,o � mo �. 0�E4� O 0 -� O N +� N R ON N 0% a r•1 b b -r1 O G! U C! 0 0 •.4 134 z 4 u m= x93 00 N 0 V N O pau D � a41 ov '� �u m x� Om b to O 510 0 00 0 m 04 A •�+ A A �n .�_ �0m 4 b b•rq -A m O pq0�41 'V'OOAa g U R>r > u U bA� m 4 x +°� a 4--) V • (A °b0,o 0� AN < b �° 90 4J ore b a�MW +1 o � ,4 4J H 43 0 V O m 41 A � W E }� ° N C b a N 41 W R ON IN ON I0 b n A� �r4� N p >r 0 b b � �Um • 4))mr4 a z 4 U cn Z= xbgo H v u� M O au a a 4, a m b 00 �o S '' 0 00 V m a NUmm•• A •1 A A erf 4J ­4 4� 0 m tP 044 is o •,� •.1 m O � uom� 0 ci to iv 0 �b u m m �1 u ty, 0 v a) 0 a M 44 0 14 a N�'m14n b+ ox m o0 mo u'� J � A 4j 4j �V Cl O a m VP m C1 w f•1 w ° N N U IN- N 9 0 A m �. � rq 0 N m b b U m • a z 4 u En z= xbgq 4) 000•• ,d •ri A A d1 41 H 41 AA m .r 0OL t7% ++ ;4J b•H•q 0 O �NV�41 0 • 0 041 0 P4 ~O Cl mA a� L tp to A 4'N P4 4) o A i a in E4 M 44 to 0 14 0 o� �o04ab �f b41 0A • 0 0 a0 ++ a b044-0uw 4J �- m 41 VVaa0r4 4 A rq �I a 04 ou a,444� 4J E 11 0 0 • ? J w A E+ W I 41 W I.Tw N tyl0 0 N fa >i •n A R p -A 41 O � g b � 0 � m - 000•ro N z 4 U 0 -- xb 0 0 r•1 V V M a� 41 a OX b a O 41 O N U m a 0U4f0 ,C •� A �I eh V H 4d �• tp 2 +J m .rq = 8 O 10� 40r♦ q�+� •rl •rl m O $4 010 O 'mob 1 Vb U m P4 0 04 a b A it rl >410' V u (d .4J 0 m �1 a) °1 a + 40 01 0 .N a b CO 2 4-) O .W k0k14 U '''4 �• Hl J ,.0Au a • 4.)E�� r A 4E 0 . O .. 4-) N 9 ON 11 lT e N N G) G) II •4 10 44 0 0 q q b b 41 oroH0A U r fd P4 z 4 •H u En 4) 0 0 •rl = xb 00 V V H O papqq � a h pp04q EO 00 o b 00 R O 1� O O V o a 0 U 0 0 ,� •� A �I rf 4.)� 40 j 4J V V m 4J rl 8 •.� U 1 on bAV� >1 V r. s t3m 4J U IV A _ --c m 2 a' a N W '0 q3 k-If w �°ea° O q 10 4J Off! o $4 4J H N a41uw° n = m 41 O �'�•1 � U iJ 4J O o r. C� £ WA 41 E4 }� O 9 t7114 t7o (a ro .. a� 44) 0 .. 4 a�i .,.., a�i •r s •q +o+ ro ro 4>1 0 �oro mq QlU0oo -A a z 4 v cn = xb 00 H V V H 0 au 41 pau N � N O m 943 m O N V m a Gl U al dl �• 4-) 4� ago° M 00 b• X00 4J U� O q m V 0 1 0 U b,0 0rl >410, 4J 0 U N.0 m AA 00 4.) 4.) • ONIONON k b a) * 14 A 10 0 04 000 to 0A ° $4 A N H b w�r4%4 U UFO 40 4M v- +� 4 0 •� 44A BAH $4 O 4J 0 Gl U NaO0 N a • 0 b AOo0N V A NH0 q H ro b •-4 :3 N U G! dl 0 -A P4 z 4 u En - xb00 ID �� Fs —x, F. -.I 3-0J i!t■ia -1lrr. r)Jn■i�:' =`!'tL�.1ia r.e'i:..__.f�t ti::t c�1Jd ��1� �1 � ►�a.�r -iTi r►' -fir `iii' �i � �► - ��7�a��11► !p j • in � • F r%' • • •' ► • 0 �\ u. ■ 1Q s �.■■ v ■■ n ■■ ee a r■ irr. • .r■ r err r m- ■ m.v rrr. a nr .■ sr - �� °� r.T ryr:i n +.lx .ry r rrTr s __ err fir. c.nT ■