HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda P&Z 032409
A G E N DA
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
TUESDAY, MARCH 24, 2009 AT 6:30 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, MODIFICATIONS
REPORT BY THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATOR: KARA IRWIN
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
January 13, 2009
January 27, 2009
February 10, 2009
February 24, 2009
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
Regular Members: Alternates:
Craig Kunkle (Chair) Donald Krzan (1st Alt.)
Douglas Pennell (Vice Chair) Joanne Koerner (2nd Alt.)
Barry Present
Randolph Hansen
Michael Panczak
Joy Hecht
Amir Kanel
Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board
March 24, 2009
2
1. Public Workshop
PPUD-08-12-000022: PGA Corporate Center – Parcel 5A
A request by Brian Cheguis of Cotleur & Hearing, agent for the applicant, for a rezoning
to Planned Unit Development (PUD) and site plan approval to allow for the development
of 450,000 square feet of research and development and 450,000 square feet of general
office. The subject site is located between I-95 and Alternate A1A, north of PGA
Boulevard and south of the Winchester Courts development.
Project Manager: Richard Marrero, Senior Planner rmarrero@pbgfl.com (799-4219)
Recommendation to City Council
2. Ex Parte Communication (Public Hearing)
CPTA-09-02-000016: Comprehensive Plan Text And Map Amendment
A request by Urban Design Kilday Studios, agent for The Lester Family Investments,
L.P. et al. and Palm Beach County, for a text amendment to the City’s Comprehensive
Plan Text to provide a new subcategory to the existing Mixed Use Land Use designation
for BioScience Mixed Use Developments, and a City-initiated request to amend the
notation on the City’s Future Land Use Map pertaining to the permitted land use densities
and intensities established by Ordinance 7, 2005 for approximately 708.14 acres located
south of Donald Ross Road, north of Hood Road, and east and west of Interstate 95.
Project Manager: Natalie Wong, Planning Manager nwong@pbgfl.com (799-4233)
3. OLD BUSINESS
4. NEW BUSINESS
5. ADJOURNMENT
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Florida Statute 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodations to
participate in this proceeding should contact the City Clerk’s Office, no later than five days prior to the proceeding, at telephone number (561)
799-4120 for assistance; if hearing impaired, telephone the Florida Relay Service Numbers (800) 955 -8771 (TDD) or (800) 955-8770 (VOICE),
for assistance. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board, Local Planning Agency, or Land
Development Regulations Commission, with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, they will need a record of the
proceedings; and for such, they may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Exact legal description and/or survey for the cases may be obtained from the f iles in the Growth
Management Department.
Common/pz agenda 03.24.2009doc
1
2
03
6
7
8
1%
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
ClTY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 13,2009
The regular meeting was called to order at 6.30 p.m. by Chair Craig Knnkle
I. CALL TO ORDER
11. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLLCALL
PRESENT Craig Kunkle, Char; Douglas Pennell, Vice Chair; Randolph Hansen; Michael
Panczak; Joy Hecht; Amir Kanel, Donald Knan (for Barry Present).
ABSENT: Bany Present
ALSO PRESENT: Growth Management Adminisbator Kad'Im'k,,,Planning Manager Nilsa
Zacarias, Senior Planner Stephen Mayer, Planner Richard ..Marrero, Interim City Attorney R.
Max Lohman
N. - None.
V.
Randolph Hansen made a motion nominatmg Craiz Kunkle
Joy Hecht seconded.
Motion passed 7-0.
Craig Kunkle made a motion nominati
Randolph Hansen seconded.
APPOINTMENT OF CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR
Growth Management Administrator Irwin final adoption of the Evaluation and Appraisal
Renort (EAR) based Amendment. vri. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Chair Kunkle made a motion to accept the July 22,2008 minutes.
~~
Vice Chair Pennell seconded.
Motion passed 7-0.
Michael Panczak ma
Vice Chair Pennell seconded.
Motion passed 7-0.
Those planning to give testimony in the hearings were sworn in.
Ex parte communication was reported by Chair Kunkle, Vice Chair Pennell, Randolph
Hansen, Michael Pa
VIII. PUBLIC HE
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
1. Ex Parte Communication (Public Hearing)
CPTA-06-12-000008: PGA Corporate Center (Parcel 5A): A request by Jeff Marshall on
behalf of Catalfumo Construction and Development, Inc., for a Comprehensive Plan text
amendment to the Future Land Use Element to add a definition and provide criteria for areas
highly suitable for increased office intensity; and provide policies to increase the DIU
thresholds for office, encouraging development that will expand the economic base of the
City.
The following individuals commented on this agenda item: Jeff Marshall, Senior Planner
Stephen Maver.
pt the September 9, 2008 minutes.
oy Hecht, Amir Kanel and Donald Krzan.
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING
01-13.09
PAGE 1
1
2 PUBLIC COMMENTS
3
4
5
6 Randolph Hansen seconded.
7 Motion passed 7-0.
8 RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
9 2. Ex Parte Communication (Public Hearing)
Chair Kunkle opened the public hearing.
Eileen Tucker, Shady Lakes, Palm Beach Gardens,
Chair Kunkle closed the public hearing.
Vice Chair Pennell made a motion for approval.
10
11
Petition ANNX-07-08-000002: Frenchman’s Crossin?: Request to,annex a ten-acre parcel
of land currentlv located within unincorporated Palm Beach County: jj_
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
The following individuals commented on this agenda item: Jemifer Tiphe, Senior Planner
Stephen Maver.
Chair Kunkle opened the public hearing.
Chair Kunkle closed the public hearing.
Randolph Hansen made a motion for approval.
Donald Krzan seconded.
Motion passed 7-0.
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
3. Ex Parte Communic
CPMA-07-08-000007: Fre
use map amendment to ch
Palm Beach County Me
Commercial (C).
Chair Kunkle opened the,,
Chair Kunkle closed the
Randolph Hansen made
Vice Chair Pennell second
Motion passed 7-0.
RECOMMENDATION
4.
PPUD-07-08-000018: Frenchman’s.Crossinp: A request by Jennifer M. Tighe on behalf of
Live Oak Land Hood Road, LLC, for rezoning to a Planned Unit Development (PUD)
Overlay with underlying General Commercial (CG-1) zoning district and a site plan approval
to allow the development of a 45,600 square-foot retail grocery store and 16,600 square feet
of general commercial uses on-site. The ten-acre parcel is located on the northwest comer of
Hood Road and Alt
Chair Kunkle opened the public hearing.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Carolyn Chaplik, 715 Hudson Bay Drive, Palm Beach Gardens; Jim Keeley, 380 Columbus
Street, Palm Beach Gardens.
Chair Kunkle closed the public hearing.
Randolph Hansen made a motion for approval.
Vice Chair Pennell seconded.
Motion passed 7-0.
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
5. Ex Parte Communication (Public Hearing)
ten-acre parcel hm
Ex Parte Communication (Public Hearing)
PLANNING, ZONINGANDAPPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING
01.13.09
PAGE z
1 0:
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
21
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
0 26
0
PUDA-08-08-000019: Gardens Medical Center: A request by Anne Booth, agent for Urban
Design Studio, on behalf of Health Care Property Investors, Inc., for approval of an
amendment to the development order of the Gardens Medical Center PUD to renovate the
existing site and expand an existing major conditional use Emergency Care Department by
6,431 square feet, expand the mechanical area by 1,500 square feet, and make minor
modifications to improve circulation, parking, and landscaping. The subject site is generally
located on the southeast comer of Bum Road and Gardens East Drive and is approximately
22.2 acres in size.
The following individuals commented on this agenda item: Anne Booth, Urban Design
Chair Kunkle opened the public hearing.
Kilday Studio. . , '. .,
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Donna Cannon, 3518-B Gardens East Dnve, Palm Beach Gardens.
Chair Knnkle closed the public heanng.
Vice Chair Pennell made a motion for approval.
Joy Hecht seconded.
Master Signage Program
g, on behalf of NorthCorp
endment to the Master
ity Development (PCD),
generally bounded by the Gardens Station PUD to the n
Road to the south, and th lway to the..east.
The following individual ted on this agenda item:
the Northcorp Properly Owners Association, Jim Griffin. property developer, Senior
Planner Richard Marreto.
Joy Hecht made a motion
Donald Krzan seconded.
Motion passed 4-3, Rando
RECOMMENDATION ?O CITYCOUNCIL
7. Ex Parte Communication (Public Hearing)
REZN-08-07-000003: Loxahatchee Slouch Natural Area: A joint CityKounty-initiated
rezoning of several parcels of real property within the Loxahatchee Slough and Sandhill
Crane Natural Areas from Planned Development Area (PDA) to Conservation (CONS)
zoning. Said parcels oomprise approximately two thousand twenty-four (2,024) acres in size
and are. owned by Palm Beach County, and are located in three general locations west of the
Turnpike, and north of Northlake Boulevard.
The following individuals commented on this agenda item: Senior Planner Stephen Maver.
Chair Kunkle opened the public hearing.
Chair Kunkle closed the public hearing.
Vice Chair Pennell made a motion for approval.
Amir Kana1 seconded
Motion passed 7-0.
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
8. Ex Parte Communication (Public Hearing)
Michael Panczak and Donald Krzan dissenting.
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGUWR MEETING
01-13.09
PAGE 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
REZN-08-07-000004: Northlake Congress Plaza: A City-initiated rezoning for a parcel of
real property known as the Northlake Congress Commercial Center from Residential Medium
(RM) to Commercial General (CGl) zoning district. This property comprises approximately
one and 37/100 (1.37)* acres in size, is located on the north side of Northlake Boulevard
approximately one mile east of 1-95 at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Congress
Avenue, and is owned by Northlake Venture L.C.
The following individuals commented on this agenda item: Senior Planner Stephen Maver.
Vice Chair Pennell made a motion for approval.
Amir Kana1 seconded.
Motion passed 7-0.
M. OLD BUSINESS
Vice Chair Pennell requested the status of Downtown at
Growth Management Administrator Kara Irwin sta
be resubmitting on Friday.
Vice Chair Pennell requested the status of the Thorougfifare Plan.
Growth Management Administrator Kara Irwin stated there is no
anything.
X. NEW BUSINESS
Vice Chair Pennell requested that Board members be g
Growth Management Administrator Kara Irwin agreed.
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING
01.13.09
PAGE 4
1 0; 4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 0 ;;
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40 41 42
43
44
45
46
47
48
XI. ADJOURNAMENT
Chair Kunkle adjourned the meeting at 9:23 p.m. The next regular meeting will be held
January 27,2009.
APPROVED:
Craig Kunkle, Chair
Douglas Pennell, Vice Chair
Bany Present
Randolph Hansen
Joy Hecht
ATTEST:
Debbie Andrea
Public Information Coordinator
Note: These minutes are prepared in compliance with 286.011 F.S. and are not verbatim
transcripts of the meeting.
All referenced attachments are on file in the Office of the City Clerk. - Note: The Public Information Coordinator swore in those preparing to give testimony.
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING
01*13.09
PAGE 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 27,2009
The regular meeting was called to order at 6:30 p m. by Chair Craie Kunkle.
I. CALL TO ORDER
11. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
111. ROLL CALL
PRESENT:
Michael Panczak. Jov Hecht Amlr Kanel.
Chair Craig Kunkle, Vice Chair Douglas Pennell, Randolph Ransen, Barry Present,
12 ABSENT: None.
13 ALSOPRESENT: Growth Management Admmstrator Kara Inurn, Senior Planner Stephen
14 Maw. Planning Manager Nilsa Zacanas, Interim City Attorney R. Max Lohman.
15 IV: REPORT BY XARA IRWIN, GROWTH-MAN AGEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
16
17
18
19 V. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND MODIFICATJONS
20 None
On January 19,2009 City Council meehng had first reading of The Waterway Cafe application for
rezonmg. The City Council adhered to the recommendahon of the Plmg, Zoning and Appeals
Board on the LA Fitness signage petition.
21 VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
22 None.
23 VII. PUBLIC HEARINGS
24
25
Ex parte communication regarding Ballen Isles was declared by Vice Chair Pannell, Joy Hecht,
Amir Kanel. Randolph Hansen, and Michael Panczak.
26 RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
27
28 1.
29
30
31
32 Drive.
33
34 Studios, Mark Fuller, artist.
35
36
37
38 Randolph Hansen seconded.
39 \lotion p;isscd -4.
40 RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
41
42
43
44
4s
Ex parte Communicoti.tii (Public Ilmrin:)
MISC-08-08-(10(1017: Gardens Medical Center: .\laster Siznace Program. A request by
Anne Booth of lirban L)c,igii Studio. on Iw1i:ilfof I.Iecllthcare Property Invcstors, Inc, for approval of
the Master Sicnay Program for the Palm I3e;ich Gardens Medical Center Planned Unit Development
(PUD), generally locatc.d nt the soiitlie~st comer of the intersection of Hums Road and Gardens East
The following individuals commented on this agenda item: Anne Booth, Urban Design Kilday
Chair Kunklr opened the public hearing
Chair Kiinkle closed the public hearing.
Douglas Pritnell made a motion for approval.
Fu Pirtc Cornmimication (Public Hearing)
2. CPSS-07-U$-000001: Ballenlsles Wet Ournarcel (Parcel 13.01) A request by Cotleur &
Heanns. In<., agent for E \\', Outparccls, I.I.C, for a Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Map
Amenclment to modify the Future Land Use Map to change the designation from a Residential Low
(RL) Future Land Use category to a Professtonal/Oltice (PO) Future Land Use category of an
0 PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING
01.27.09
Page 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
21
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
31
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
approximately 7.31-acre vacant parcel of land, known as the Balledsles West Outparcel, generally
located at the southwest comer of the intersection of PGA Boulevard and Balldsles Drive.
The following individuals commented on this agenda item: Donaldson Hearing, Cotleur &
Hearing, Senior Planner Stephen Maver.
Interim Citv Attornev R. Max Lohman stated the site plan could not be considered tonight, only
the land use designation.
Growth Manavement Administrator Kara Irwin discussed the level of service analysis.
Chair Knnkle opened the public hearing.
Anne Booth, 477 South Rosemary Avenue, West Palm Beach, David'Panlsen, 27 St. George
Place, Palm Beach Gardens.
Chair Kunkle closed the public bearing.
Interim Citv Attornev R Max Lohman stated the recomm
application must be reviewed for compatibility of land use.
accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. Should the.:C
applicant can resubmit an application after one year. .
Interim Citv Attornev R. Max Lohman reiterated.that the
recommendation to the City Council of the applicant's quest to change the parcel with a current
land use designation of residential low (RL) to professional offie (PO).
Vice Chair Pennell made a motion for
Michael Panczak seconded.
Motion passed 5-2, Joy Hecht and Ami
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
None.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
None.
a legislative act and the
I ..i
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING
01.27.09
nally le$ blank.)
Page 2
2
3
4
5
6
I
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 ;:
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43 44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
X. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Kunkle adjourned the meeting at 8:16 p,m.
The next regular meeting will be held Februaly 10,2009.
APPROVED:
Craig Kunkle, Chair
Bany Present
Randolph Hansen
Michael Panczak
ATTEST
Debbie Andrea
Public Information Coordinator
- Note: These minutes are prepared in compliance with 286.011 F.S. and are not verbatim transcripts of the
meeting.
All referenced attachments are on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
-The Public Information Coordinator swore in those preparing to give testimony.
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING
01 .27 .09
Page 3
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 e ;;
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 10,2009
The regular meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chair Craig Kunkle.
I. CALL TO ORDER
11. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
In. ROLLCALL
PRESENT:
Michael Panczak. Jov Hecht. Amu Kanel.
Chair Craig Kunkle, Vice Chau Douglas Pennell, Randolph Elansen, Barry Present,
ABSENT: None.
ALSO PRESENT: Growth Management Admimstrator Kara Irwin, Senior Planner Stephen
Mayer, Planning Manager Nilsa Zacarias, Interim City A
IV.
At the February 5, 2009 City Council meeting the Waterway Cafe application for rezoning was
approved. The Northlake BoulevarcUCongress rezoning, Loxahatchee Slough rezoning, applicant-
initiated change to the MI-A zoning district to allow studio uses and the Palm Beach Gardens
Medical Center Expansion were approved on first reading
V. ADDITIONS. DELETIONS Am.MODIFICATIONS
None.
VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Douglas Pennell made a motion for approval of the Oct
Amir Kanel seconded.
Motion passed 7-0.
Douglas Pennell made am on for approval of the‘october 28,2008 meeting minutes.
Amir Kanel seconded.
Motion passed 7-0.
V11. PUBLIC HEARINGS
All those preparing to give testimony were sworn in.
No ex parte communication was decl
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
Ex parte Communication (Public Hearing)
1. CUMJ-08-06-000013: Gardens Shul - Maior Conditional Use and Site Plan Approval to
Allow a Relizious Institution. A request by Ali Kalfin of Cotleur and Hearing, Inc., on behalf of the
Chabad of Palm Beach Gardens, Inc., for a Major Conditional Use to allow a 110-seat religious
institutional use, known as the “Gardens Shul” within an existing 4,486 square-foot building,
formerly known as “Gardens Home’ Management”, and a site plan approval to provide for the
renovation of existing structures, and improvements to the site. The approximately 0.6-acre site is
located at 7025 Fairway Drive, and is generally located on the north side of Fairway Drive, south of
PGA Boulevard and west of the Florida Turnpike.
The following individuals commented on this agenda item: Ali Kalfin, Cotleur & Hearing.
Interim Citv Attornev R. Max Lohmao a parcel must be able to sustain the parking for its use on
site.
Growth Management Administrator Irwin the application is being treated like every other
application in the City. The limitations are based on what the applicant can sustain.
Chair Kunkle opened the public hearing.
R. Max Lohmm,
REPORT BY KARA IRWIN. GROWTH MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATOR
14,2008 meeting minutes.
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING
02 .10.09
Page 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Michele Dickstein, 15 Cambna Road East, Palm Beach Gardens; Allyn Pier, 2602 26Ih Court,
Jupiter.
Chair Kunkle closed the public hearing.
Douvlas Pennell made a motion for approval.
Amir Kanel seconded.
Motion passed 7-0.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
None.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
None.
(The remainderofthisp
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING
02 .10.09
Page 2 0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
IO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 ;:
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42 43 44
45
46
41
48
49
50
X. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Kunkle adjourned the meeting at 7:16 p.m.
The next regular meeting will be held Fehruaj 24, 2009
APPROVED:
Craig Kunkle, Chair
Douglas Pennell, Vice Chair
Barry Present
Randolph Hansen
Michael Panczak
iy Hecht
ATTEST
Debbie Andrea
Public Information Coordinator
- Note: These minutes are prepared in compliance with 286.011 F.S. and are not verbatim transcripts of the
meeting.
All referenced attachments are on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
Note:The Public Infomation Coordinator swore in those preparing to give testimony.
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING
02 .10.09
Page 3
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
38
47 0
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 24,2009
The regular meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chair Craig Knnkle
I. CALL TO ORDER
11. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
In. ROLLCALL
PRESENT:
Michael Panczak, Joy Hecht, Amir Kanel.
Chair Craig Kunkle, Vice Chair Douglas Pennell, Randolph &men, Barry Present,
ABSENT: None.
ilson, Director of
Planning Manaeer Natalie Wong distributed a copy of Ordinance 5, 2009 to Board members,
directed any questions to the City Clerk and explained that an Executive Summary will be
forthcoming. Interim Citv Attorney R. Max Lohrnan explained reshucturing to five members and
two alternates through attrition.
Planning Manager Natalie Wong dis information regarding the upcoming transit-orientd
charrette and Palm Beach Gardens Medical Ce d the Master Signage Program was approved
at the February 19,2009 City Council meeting.
Planning Manager Natalie Wong stat
V. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND MODIFICATIONS
None.
VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Vice Chair Pennell made a motion for
Michael Panczak seconded.
Motion passed 7-0.
VII. PUBLIC INGS
All those preparing to give testimon
No e9 parte communication was declared.
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL
Ex parte Communication (Public Hearing)
1. PPUD-07-08-000016 Regions Bank Planned Unit Develooment - Maior Conditional Use
with Site Plan. A request from Andrea Cardo, the agent for Regions Bank, to approve the Regions
Bank Planned Unit development (PUD) and Major Conditional Use on a 1.54 acre parcel previously
occupied by the Scalisi Brothers Produce Market, located at 3855 Northlake Boulevard,
approximately 500 feet east of 1-95, The proposed PUD and Major Conditional Use includes a 3,820
square foot bank with four (4) drive-thru lanes and one (1) additional lane for drive-up ATM use.
The following individuals commented on this agenda item: Andrea Cardo. Planning Manaeer
Natalie Wong. Planner Kathryn Wilson.
Chair Knnkle opened the public hearing.
Patricia Coloma, 3812 Van Cott Street, Lake Park, FL; Kim Freeze, 3836 Van Cott Street,
Lake Park, Florida.
Chair Kunkle closed the public hearing.
Vice Chair Pennell made a motion for approval without the East wall sign.
regarding questions about Briger.
the November 10,2008 meeting minutes.
PLANNING, ZONINGANDAPPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING
02 .24.09
Page 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Amir Kanel seconded. 0
Motion passed 6-1, Bany Present dissenting.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
Barry Present, Vice Chair Pennell requested a status on the missing link fiom Shady Lakes to
11 7th Court North.
Status on Maureen Barber’s petition for a fence variance at Evergrene was denied in December.
Amir Kanel requested the status on Downtown at the Gardens.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
None.
(7’he remaindero/thispage ini
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING
02 .24.09
Page 2 0
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 ;:
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
41
48
49
50
0
X. ADJOURNMENT
Chair Kunkle adjourned the meeting at 7:30 p.m.
The next regular meeting will be held March 10,2009.
APPROVED:
Craig Kunkle, Chair
Douglas Pennell, Vice Chair
Bany Present
Randolph Hanse
Michael Panczak
-
A
ATTEST
Debbie Andrea
Public Information Coordinator
- Note: These minutes are prepared in compliance with 286.011 F.S. and are not verbatim transcripts of the
meeting.
All referenced attachments are on file in the Office of the City Clerk. Note: The Public Information Coordinator swore in those preparing to give testimony.
PLANNING. ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD REGULAR MEETING
02 .24.09
Page 3
.i L0. PARAPET (HIGH PO`NT1
COP'fi�GH7E0 ?A08
'RpS ARCHI7EC7URAL DRAYRNC IS GYbEh IN CONFlDA'C
Np USE OR OISSEMINAliON MAY EE A1A?E YATHOUT PRI�R
NR�7TfN CONSENT CF 1?;E ARCHI7ECT. nt1 CLIi{bON I.nW
F5GH75 OF CQPYRIGHT ANQ O7HSR547SE ARE HERWY
SPEGtICRLLY RESEftVEO.
LEFT ELEVATION
3/32" = i'-0'
Y �V, _ —0'-4'
RIGNT E�EVATlON
b/32' = t'-0"
ft�vI510N5 � BY
RRR m
O � ^
� � i
..�. ' � ���
� U <��
� � � � v
O O O j L
m
0.�
T �
� � 3
T p�
� X�
.� ��
��
c
��� p is�.
� I f.{'li
����Il�i'�
.n1t
I,N,�,�;., -
,:�:�;; I
' �uuu �
_ jiiii111� ;
i�liilli '
illlr�' I
. ��
.q,
�nl,l� •
. lilfill� � :
11t�lll� I ' .
Q
Q
LY
Q
J
LT
�
Z
W
�
�
Q
� �
� � Q C)
`-' � L¢i3
I—z�m
� � � �
-� a _,
C5� m Q �
. �
� I I i
1 I I 1 ; I I I i 1
I I
- - - � - - - - '^: - � - � - - - -I- - m____._ _ ___-�. ... ��� .__. _ ___�_ - -� -I _ ;_
I I ., -s ��' \`��� i ! I i �� i/� \�ti �r � i I
^ Tne �� \�\ y I � I � ��// �` r.ae� � 7
� � � nh.aia5-a� � ,�`.�
/! �� � // RW \\ I TA ANW�Ef // Y(.L \\ / // �
i � .� .v� �i \ �� ` � �r ♦\ I I I � i �` � r G "i ��` � ,, _m �
APNVR� '/ RW.L�\ / \ ���.W.L \ .0.TMUFE7
/ � F/' `
_ � �. _ � //// ' ..... ,_ _ �II y _^_ _�z p' L ` — _ - __!___ KW. .._ ....._. �� j{ _ _ _. _ ``\\ , \\\ � �'
�� /�� �� / �� � �;\ � {
� �/ i� / � / �� \ / �
+ `\ � �i //J � il � / I�� � `\\\ �,, I
i � i 11 eaor� cuiae� 7 iocsn i(i i �*� �i 1
i I i illl / �� I
f ll / II �` �
// � u ; u � \ I
f
� , �,
f
3 �� I I I ("--"" -'-"' � I I \�� I
— � ` i �/ ' — — � — — — � — � — — f — I — — � — — — — � — — --t� �\`` I—
1 � i I I ��� � � t � I �� s�n�iw a�`��{a�rr �(ryim ar�� I i � �
/ � erJ(p 8P, pIXR t Ji@, �# .1DPk15 uWn071T W�t��1�J �^SR�i� I \, 1
f � � p$i+l�A � 1FALL§16A , O�r ff 1 LAYER iff.�4N9AAiKk 54lR9 BAff + \ �
�� / I � 9tQTiYcaUdDClllYiAShMmiOkEIHCTRI
� i GiFi15 6 CASRY-N AM1 A 9RF/F<NiFR 6 j � \� �
DxIAQAS Y�RAA SUff/.CFb, YRGItD &�U1YN
/ � � '-' GP 9ffEf,Vt KINpW1Y gi IN NLL MCPPNCS �
� � I I � C � �� ff T1PE-3 5hP ASRUlT R2 FeC Iff�iS � � �
\ � g ¢tv.+,r�'-a•� I uark�tioi,u����rsro ( \\ �
I ♦ f� � � r.c. rAw�cr cm �v.e cpa s�tn, rw eaLw war waaurrc.) ( � ♦\ ry �
��1C itLi-0� \
'uo. PNVR'! - i ! fl
� i ` T.
� \\ � � � � � � � � � �/ �
T I T ,� PoCd WQ[� 11'+E /
� � £L£i * F fl4'-e' /
I \ �
� � i �i
1 ,�� 1 I " i I ! I i� I
i �
� ` $ /
,.� �� y �� r� -a
t0. PFAFPET • � / i � � / L0. P691AEi
/
i I ��`\ /� i i �' R00.�'iOPEQUI QiT:QCA71 � � f�� / I I
i
/
\�'„� �\ I — a.w.� �� � �I �.w.� — i� \�//` I i
_ ...�1 _ _ �L _ � ''--'"====cs= — --
-- __=---_ i
___.....�._�. _ _�__��_. ry-�i� n�� — — �ZV.t — ___—_ — _�_` _ _ _• _ I_
� � _�= ._._ � �__� - —�-.- � ..._..._._ ' ��_. __.__ I µ i
nrv. +,:r-n• — sin. .,u�-m �
r.o. r,u�cr � � � v� � ta ra�r
I 1 I i � I
, � n�v. �ns--0 .
... �. _ _. ____�_ ,_ _ _� _ _ _. �... _ �.. � xa auwer A __ � ._ ,_ u� ._ _. � — � ._ — �I _. _
� -- !- ;
1 1 i I I I I I I !
I � I I I I I
ccavaicH�v 2ooe
iMIS ARCf:I7EC?t;RPl DP.A\V1NG IS C�V:N IN CCNflDFJJC�
!:0 Usc OR OISS£M11InA710N uAY 8E MAp� v�1'iNOUT PR�OIt
Wf21TiEN CONSSNT GF lHE ARCNi�CT. AU. fAIAMDN L4W
ftW^HTS OF COP'fRIGHi AN� OiryERW15E ARE HcReBY
SPEGFICALLY ftES:RYEO.
_. � ... S x-.....'V`'x?�' .. . .. , .
R00� Pi�AN
x�: ,��- � , -�-
��!
:��i
�
��1
��
���
��
�
i.
�j���i��i�i�
- �'!(;�'i �
�Ifi�'f,l
' �twiyl
IfNI� I
�, i .
�:,h,r:i .
�uiiiu�} -
` 9II���`,
uil
��!VUt,
: ����ii � � �
. �pi�, � : :
4
Q
�
�
._1
ii
�
Z
Lu
C
�
d
� �
i �
���c:
Q
� � � �
�— � J T1
{1� o U g
� .�
�<Q
G�m,i�
aR.avm�
C�-+EOKED
�ATG
ri 24 ea
SCALC
AS NOTEG
�aa Na,
SHEET
!� ..— l a
� � �J
R� SHE�TS
i�t.l
C�]
�
�
_
C.7
�
.-_ ,�-;..._..
��oNT
..
�J
.,
N
COPI'aiC�f{lED 2006 �
THIS ARCH17fCTURA� ORA.HtN6 IS G1YEP7 Iti COYFlOENCE
NO IJSE OR ���cEMiNA110N MAY BE b'.�lE Y7.'M�XIi ?R:OR
1Y21TTc7J �CJNSEN7 OF TriE ARCHI3ECT. ALL COMA�CN f.AlV
ftIGH`S �F CAP:'RIGHi nN0 tlTHERNiSE ARE HEF?EBY
SPECf�ICALIY RESERVED.
�IRST FLOOR GARAGE PLaN
3/32" = t'-0'
s t �r
��
f---
Ls,..
W
J
��'.
��;
-�:
_�'
-..
-.
�.'
��
m
� �
y y �
�
� � 6 ��
V �V1 N � rG
O 'D O L�
�
N
O �
P �
T � "1
� ��
Q��
Ey�
a
- I���������I
IIj�ill
lu,dn�
I116� �;
. AIIIIIII. �
,. �'�4II:IIN �
���''i��� �
����:a� _
_ ip. ��;ii�l
= ir,�;�,°.
)'��i:� ��ii I
iI;!tI:IGiP
I ti"jili!
_ ��1�:�,
p�Yn �1!��
- �i�+iiilr � -
Q;i,im�ul�f
Q
a
�
O
�
�
�
Z
�
� p
� �
� Q
� r� �
L� �' .� C:
���¢
�
�---- z -� m
� � V �
-� � J
CCi 0:1 LL. ¢
DRAWN
CHEGKEp
DATE
11/24/08
SCALC
AS NOTED
.IOB NO.
SHEET
I \ __ l
%�� �
� s�-�="ats
� �
\J W
��?-- —
CU--- -
�-- —
�— _
� C07YRI.,N^�,T.#U 2008
i 7Y.IS ARGHI'R'CiUNA� OR�NtflG 15 f'VQJ � W CONFlDENCE
i NQ USE CR OI5Sr.MINAiION IdAY Bc i1A0f }51THWT PRIOfi
v,�ir�r+ cohsair oF n+e aRCtn�cr. nu ca+taov uw
WGHT5 0� COPIRIGHT AN� p7HERt49$E ARE HEREBY
5?ECIFlCnLtY RE`.�Ri/E0.
�� Y � � �' � � iQ
. :
: �� r____,�_,�.___��—�
�
I I I I 1 � � I I i � !
S�COND FLOOR GaRi�GE PLAN
5/32° � 1'-D'
�
RE�'�SIONS BY
m
o � �
W � i
.:' c ° �4�
v+ �'
t - � �9•-
(„t (�1 N �
m n V
P '7 p —
N
6
��F�
T ^ rt
� ��{�
Sy
��
�Ilnlill� !
: �a119�
Ii���i�
: � I�u�;�� � _
� imm;b
' �Ilil!:
: Ij ir'i11��
_ �;iy�r.�
�.,:
�t,i'�,�,
:,Im,i �
;�,i �
;�o,,,
!°��� - _
Q
0
�
G
�
�
�
Z
W
� n
. �
� �
� i.v
� �
� � Q CJ
� �� � �
I— Z ;m
� � C�.,� �
� � J
�O m � �
DF2AWN
GhiECKED
CF.YE
1i/24/OS
SCAi-E
_ AS NQTEO
JOS NO,
5�-iEEY
!—'� — L
PF SMV�_T':.'
C
�— _
� -
� v
�
� —
IXWIRIGN7E� 2P79
lHl& ARCHIIECiURFI, DRAYANG IS G��tN I� CONFlDENCE
NO USE 0.R DI° .RiA710Y MAY 8E WAC1E NilHW7 PRtQ4
WRITTQJ CONSEC7T OF 1}k' ARCHITEu^T. AlL COkMOM l,f.Y/
ftIGNTS Oi CO?1RIGHT hN0 07HER'MSE ARE HERE6Y
SPEGflCALLY RESERVEO,
I � I I I � I � 4 �
i H1RD FLOOR D�FICE PL,�N
3/32° « r-o• FOURTH �ND FI�TH FLQOR PLANS SiMILAR
—�:
��
:��.
�_�.
—�:
_�.
_�
a
M
.�. m �`^�
U N
.+ L � ��r.
� v
U N � ��^tp
� N N v
O 'O O �
`m
o "
mx
rs R
� ��
��
��
�!�!P:�i!PII�I
- i,,�,;;,
- ,i';�:.:.,.;
.;; �r: �;:,
: :ii; . �� ;; �.
i4a•��.;;�
'�'j: In£� ij
+:;.,,,,�,�
_ ��il�a�,� �I
� i;:;�:l..�iri
�,: r�� �,; ,;
`i�' . Wn
. �Ili'.;if, ��
- I';!iiii�Ll
Iil;;� 11,;
' ���I�I� i�
�'���i�:�l�j
Q
�
Ln��..
�
J
L�
VI
�
�
� Q
�' �
� �rA
V
��/ �' T
L..L � Q (�
� �.n �n Q
I---- z J m
����
r. � J
� � � a
� � � � � � � � � �
I I I I 1 I 1 I I I
i
i
Ir --- ----------_.._v.------ ._�........------ �
AD--- — —1 — — — — — — L�— —�� " , — — — — — — — — — — — � — —
I i I � I I . I � I � 1 1 I
I� � _ ------ � :.-w�=== -__ �- ��-�--- =�___-------L�
� i i ��__�_____- I� ---- - --- �� ---_____-� ; i I
I
i i i ' i i i
�� �� �� �� �� ,�
�_ _ �� �� ,; � �� �� �� _ , _ �
� I.� ii JI 1; ^ 11 U '� 'L il _ il I� �� 1 _�'
� — 1 ^R-- � � II II 1
1 II 11 II 11 II 11 11 ��I Ili il �•' 1 II 1 VI
U11 II i{ il 11 II II il 11 II �I
11 11 II 11 11 p � II 0 II II �i 11 11 I tl
il P f p 11 11 II {i
� {I �� 11 II � 11 11 11 11 II ll �1 11 1 11
' i ' ii ii ii ii � ii �ii ni ii � ii ii ii i � ii (
1 -_'_=_=v" ii I 11 il II 1I ;I �I I{ !� 1; ii ii i I ii :_aaoccc-e'
I �
� � � � , � � �
��=c===�=�_= I I I I -________== I
I i I I '�--`-"-- � I ( I
------------
4_.___ _ - ______ ^.. � � — — — — —s,-- — — i e�ev. — t r — ; — — � — — — � — =_- =_---_ _ ,.�
� , ; ; �d =� E � , � ;
�a ! I I i EL�V. ��rr � I I ���,
I ( sr�,iR �, , ,; �
�,
�,
,,
_= ��
� - �
�____ _ _ _ _
� ��
, _-____�_�__ :
�
I � l
� '°___°__°_= �' �
� � �,� »
11 11 11
❑ �I II
11 II II
11 II (1
il 11 li
I( 11 II
o-.'_ _ _! u n u ��,
E. 1 II � u
�i �
; � �
J �
G---- - � --I - - ! - - -
i i i
SIXTN FLOOR 0��=10E PLAl�i
af32- _ ,•-o•
COPYFIGNtED .00S .
TilS ARCHITECNRAI.CRhW'.NG IS GlVE4 IN CONFiOENCE
NO USE OR OISSOAINA'ItOA taAY 9E MADE YfliNW7 PAIOR
1VRIT1Er1 CONSRJ7 OF �liE AI?CHITECT. rt(.L. COSiF1DN l;.W
RIGhITS OF COPY"iiICNT AyG OiNER\NSE hRE HERE9Y
$?EpFlCALLY F_=SEk�ED.
s�FiR �,i
'�_ -------- �i ;i
------------ �
� t� _�
� � � i � �
--�- _ --�-- - - - _ �-.-- - -- �-- - - - -� - - - ---�- - -
�
� � � � � ______-____ ;
i I i 1
I I I i i �, ____,_,_,__ 1
„ „ ,� , :; �
1� II 11 T II 11 /I 11 II II 11 1�
II II II 11 II II 11 II 11 11 11 1�
p I� II N 11 II II 11
II II II il 11 II il 11
11 11 It 11 11 il 1 I� II 0 11 11
II 11 11 11 il 11 11 ll
II 11 tl 11 II II �� t� 11 It 11 11
_ ii_.�_..-.� _ �� — � � ._ �� � �ii- — ii�_ _ �� � .�..ii-r_ a n � _ � _ _
�� � �I " n 0 i� �� II _�' '"' �� ^ �I
� „ �. . �; � �
,�
,
; , '=-_ .�, _- = - � ,' � � �
� � - - I - -I- -
- , � _ - F-=----_ _----_-__ _ � _ _ _ -
�r--�--- — -�--- _ i
� ---------- ---------------_____ ----___--- � � � �
__. _ . .._.__...
,
R�V'ISIONS : BY
�
f
�
I.
pi��I�i��I�
I�:�r��n
; u�,,;l'I
- i�u�,:u�
� -:^„
; I�i ����,�.d
NpIN�!
,�;:'i
_ �;li�u,+ii
� !,r!.�. :�
- ���'�����
: r����;i:,,
�I�I! � li;
�i !IEm
i ;illUr
� ���li�c
IIN' ' =
�
G
�
Q
�
�
�
�
��
�
��
� `�
>-- `�
,�
� � � u
� � �� �
I--��m
i����
� (�' J
� Q Q
Cfl m � d
of2AWN
VHECK�O
�O1ATE p
71 L� �V
SCALE
AS NOTED
JOB NO.
sHeeT
,A - �-
D= SMEET�'
T.�RAPET_(HIGH PCINT)
'°Y �v. m +as'—a-
r.�ELV, o +79'_4•
�6U F'LOOR OfFlCE
ELEV. _ +54�_2•
� $th rZ00R OffICE
Y E1EV. _ +49'-0' �
�4th Ft00R OFFlCE
ELfV. m +33'-10'
� 3ni FLDOR OFRtl_
�-g'
�. 2nd h100R GARAGE
1P ELEV. _ +9,_0"
�ist FLOOZ GARAGE
f4�V, _ -0'-8"
�T.O. PARRAET (HIGFI ?OINTj
ELEV, m +88'_4•
,� i.G. RODF �
ELE'Y J. � +7g'-g 7
�___.. &t.h F'uOQR OFFlCE
�� 2EV. = t6A•-Z•
� 5th Fl.aOR OfFlCE
1�—fLEV. _ +49•_0•
,{. au, �.oat omC�
ELEQ V, _ �33'-;p'
�3rd f�L00R OFfICE
tCEY V, m +7$'-S`
�2nd ROOR GARAGE
EIEV. = t9•_�,
� 1st F10CR GARAGf
F3£V. _ _p•_4•
FRONT �C..EUATION
a/3z� m r-o�
RE,qR EL�VA I irJN
a��r = r_o-
w=raicr+r�o zoos
1H15 FftCHI�CNftAL ORANiNC IS CV"cN W CONFlOEN^rE
-NO USE CR pI55ElAiNA710N M�Y B£ MAOE K1IWOUT PftIW2
S'JRI7^EN ;AY�hli CF TFiE PRCHt1ECT. AU. COMMON I.AW
RICHTS 0% CAPYRICHT ANb 07H:RCAS FRE MER£3Y
S?ECiffCAtlY RESE2�0.
��m
���
—.
—.
�■�
_�
—.
�..
m
v � n
� � n
U N
rt�+ C � ��^
� U
O 'G O v
�
o �
c�
.o �5 s
r� �
` §�
'i� � d
��
��
01111�'
_ h�m'a
IR�,G
�etu -
• Vliu�n�
��i il�
����iG`
- UI6i1i
Iu�N�,
��u�� -
= '�u�� .
NI �
Q
n
�
O
�
��
�
Lc.l
CLj r�
.—� �
`� ¢
� � —r-
Cr `- 4 �
Cu;�.nW
I— � .� m
� � U �
' � �
C� m � c�
CCPIRIGHTEp 2006
THIS ARGHI'(�CiURAL ORpA9p1G 35 GIVEM IN CONFlDENCE.
NO UST OR �ISSfMM�At10M1 MAY 8E iAhtlr KS7NCU7 PRIOR
VF.2tT�EN CONSEtdT 0.° THE Aft�."�iIiECT. hL'. COMMCK LASV
RIGHTS Cf COPIRIGHT PND OiriEftYr7SE ARE HEREBY
SFC•dFICALLY RE'S�'RVE�.
sa!r,r�,uraaTar,.s.-nF r.m•:.:�- : �,s:�.scr_ur�.�c:�esr�...�..;�.-^�
,;, ;.o. anane`r inicn �o�„
� Ei.EV. _ +88'_4•
�`:.0. 4tlOf
�v. m ,,9�_a.
h Sth FLODR OFFiCE
�LE'J. _ +84'-2'
� 5:f� FLOOR CFfiCE
� ELEV. _ +49'-�"
� 4th ROOR OFflCE
� EIEV. m +33'-10" .�_
�. Jrd E100R Or'F10E
� ELEV. a *16•-9•
J� 2nc FI.COR GARAG"c ,�
ELN. _ +9,_0•
is! FLOOR GARAGE
FiFV. _ -o'-n"
� L0. PARAPET (NIGN P01'1'p
� EIEY, o }$g•_;"
� T.O. R60F
,� fIEV. � +79,_d•
_b._6th FLOCR 9fflCE
1' ELV. = 464'-2'
_� S;n Fl.COR �FFlQ
EI.EY. _ +45'-0"
4th PI,OOR O��C:
ELEV. m +33'-10"
_ ._ � �. r.� .- .._ � - 'i' {"� T - � - ._ _ �
1.- =. _.. _ .....' _ - - ___. _ _. ._... ...._ ._ _ ._. ._. u- - - ,
, '_
,
, ,
�
_ _ _ ;.._ _I._ _ _ .._. _ _ - - - - - ,- - - - - - ;�__ � _._ ._._.. ._., _
LEFT SIDE E�F `JATIO�I
3/32• = 1•_0�•
_ — � .._ � _... _.. tr-y -q— ....... �. � _ .� -�- � _..._ .-..._ _., ..._ _.
e�v.�+is—e• — ------- �—�._ _ -------
— T
{ pn
, _
2nd it00R GARAGE � � �,
� ELEV. _ +9'-G" � �.... ..._... � � —'{ i — — — — — — — — _.._ �
i � 1 i -� �.) �
i ; �
_� . t;t FLOO,C CAftkG£ � f _ � � �
�_ _ i I
ELEV. _ -p•-8•
R{LHT �;DE ELEVATION
3/32" = i'-0"
��;
—�:
—..
;-�
—.
—.:.
_.:
_.
��
m
� � n
� � �
U �
O �
.�i C ' � �
� U
V �N h � tC
� � v
`o a o g
�
n
rn#
p� �
r
� 8�
��
�
��
._.�_
x
i Cg
� � £°i
� z � �i
= 9
� � o ��
a
� �a
� 6 Q��
� s ��
;�. , � �.�
Q
Q
�
�
J
�
�
�
�1]
� �
_ �
� 4
� �
"`) _
O�`��
I— z -� m
t�av�
-�? C� _..I
C9 m o�.. �
� � � � O � � 6 s ,o�
, I � � �
i 1 1 I i i I I I I
� r 1 r -I i
�
�}— ' — _ -� � _ ._ .... , .... _ _ "✓d F40ai 9EJC � , ,_ — _ , _, _ .... 7 _ _ � _ � _ _._.._.
.�.� ��m
� i i � � � �
i .4 �AIf'^ �
{ � k7fJ. f8� 9'�'� I
9fl<'-4' � � 1 T.Q P;MX c'i• I El£l. r-t' �
( , t -4• I P.6 PIAIPE(
i.0. PNIH'�R , „ ( T.A PAAtPF.[
I I i r.�_._._.._ � �..,._,..........._��__-J..._W_��M.»..._:--� I I I
--------T --�._��� t-
,__—_ � —="- j ,�_ ------ r_._.__,..._._...
r\ _ —I � �.. �... � w� � �. ' — � � W I � �� ,�, A w � �.c�.� I 1� _ � .-.�� .—_.� .` I
\G t— I ^ `...� .'�.`� ` � � �
' �'� _^.:.." �-� ; __...__�.._ R.1V.4 ' � .N'.L �
� �� �.,�.� i i � / � i i i� w.� , i
� ipp i i � � �'�
i ,i i
�� I .� � RQOF7@� EWIP�OCA� � � I I �
i �
I � i i
� �gp I 1 ( I I I ;� I
I 'N I � I ( I
� ' I
I ' ;� �
� � l I i ;�{===7� �------- � I I �� �
fl�._. _ � .... .... �1� _ _ _ — —t--il— --i+— — ( — — � — — -- — !� �
_ � � � S� �I j 1 � � ,I
I� � I� �� 4 � =� _�
� I I � �� � � � ' T.O. PRRaPEf � � �.� �, �
( � �i ;� I �� I �
� ' ��----�1 I
� i 4___J � _ _J �
� � �� ' __
�, 3'x5'-8` R00.'' � i j
'j I � � C���FLtSfi 600R A.YD& i �
, _�
1 � - � 1k5fiA;1 d %P. 7dRE5HqD — � �
� � i
i._
� � � �� � ? ; i � —_
� ^ ��
nc +e -A RQ.^F R!CGE l NE � �'"--
� � � .."pws u6vWiE Fl9-aa IiOC�D 817W-�.' i � i
C EtEV. = E BD-9' qax srsiw a�u�ttF�prt npUUro aava� I e.ev. nt•-,•
I I �( OR i4t R-IV INLdAT�Ii gpldp p4'p � i !� Lp. P
' I ° � ' tam�, '+s�a �u� � t�vr.ua�'�uxxlm e,�;. ; �i
I I 'I , s�rycawx�uYS�mmnrcL�c.roc I�
utivu m� a.as+,x-x +ia x.�sus urm a � � i �i I
I I I IX 1 � DYIU.fLlS f{N'R4C `.iRSF�A YOpifFD &TU¢N .
a G7 SIEt7 Nt IItOf�9UNLY i( 8 ftil. Yi'.�JI;S � � � ��
Cf ',WE-3 SIkP ASGiiJLt 4'E4 fHC �'SY5
� �' � i hfNl YNtiiAC1�R5 �W0�A717LS SISiFIt W 3 ��
� �; �su� ta�.acv� oaoe xv.��ar�s ! j I
I I (za xtn oun emn. n� oai.�¢ �rt+x+ativrr.) � �� �
�
i i i� � ' � �� � #i ,, i i
I �i l� i �� � �
� �� jf • ri P OI11PAlEN'iLOCn710`! �1 �� .�
� R.W,4 �� �k
� _ 1 — � — ft9i.L �
E -� i —��^ __ �, � ?-r---�.�S,r�w.L � ,�� I _ \ \ \� , { ( R1Y.l I _..�.. ==-.�c.- ,I
� �,� ' �
� , I = '= -_.�z- �—�-
------- ------- �' ---- ----- .... _ �.
� � ' �' — — — — �
' 6s'Y. tF�'-a•
. t.0. PAMfEf ry. NN'�.F'
� ' � T.Q PA'MP�T
o- - -) --i - - � - - -
I
ooa'rRicHro zooe
ItiiS ARCNITEp7URAL DftAV49NG IS pYrN iN CCNFlDETCE
NO USE Of. piSSfIdINATI�N ldAY BE laA�E N7THOUt PPoOR
14RTiEN CONSENT CF iNE ,SRCHf(ECT. .4.1. COMAIP'i LAW
PoGNTS OF 0.'�?Y�tIGM7 AWO OTHERW,SE AR: HEREBY
SPEGFlCALLY RESEiiVFA.
Roo� P�a�
�/az- = r-o•
�� , � -- �
��rc. R.Yi.I � P..W.: „-1 '�
� I � -- EL�VVi87-t'
" � .�.._ __ � i'"f l �.��. � YA.. FRA^ET
-., � . i0. aM1PEi `Y'� � I i
-r__________________ ;--° � � - - -I- �
-i - - -' ax �oa+ �,as cEUw - - �- - - - - - i � 1 —
I ; ��..�_.• , ;
� ' ' � �
—�:
—�
—�.
���
_�
�
.
i �IIuiI;II
i dlifD
_ I���� �!i
, I �iil ;i
�m;�
�71fili:l
,I. ��.'�
- 4iiili�i
� Ili�lli �
' llJ""i
li� jp
�J
- p�Illp
fI�I II���I �; _
I I���IICil�il
d
G
L�
O
._1
Li
�
2
� W
C:.J
v-- �
J �
�� z
����
j—��t0
C�7 ca � �
_' � �
� � � �
CCPIRIGH7E0 2C08
� 11ii5 .4RCHITECRIRRL QRANiNG IS GIV3J !Y tONFltlENCE
; HO USE Ofi DlSS"eMIWtTiON IdAY BE MAOE W91tWU7 PRI0.R
! WRIi7ETl CONSEN� OF 1HE ARCJ117EC7. ALL COIiMON tTW
q(GF{T$ pK CpPYRiG47 AND OTHEft1ViSE ARE HQtEBY
SPECiFlCN1.Y Re"SERVEO.
�LOOR PLAN
,/e- r-o•
LEGEND
TYPICAL CONCRcTE i1LT pANEt GR EX'tcRtOR SNO W�1l.l
_--__--_ FUNRE 7ENAN71MPR01"'cMENi tAYOUT (UNp;ft 5ePERATE PERMI'1�
_ .. .
:��'
.��:
�
—�
:���•_
�:
i�
�.
o N ��
� � ,
V � N
� � � ���
U � y ���
N N
O 'D O J i
N
a.,
rn�
9 � g�
� e�
� ��
��
&�
' �!1011�
�IIUy i
�°';���
;nuup
: illliib
i��� �
: HiBIG� -
����:
AI
71un
- iRpif�
�h
If� � . : .
Q
r ^� 0
� �
z °
� �
C
; �
- �
� `�'
Q
� �
d
c.�
CC'�Q�
� v
O;�"�'w
}.� � � m
I� Q c�
V 1 J y �
� '� Q
� W� G'..
.� �. +22.-�•
��=i�'—°=
7.0. PARAPEi'
�, �. +,�._o.
t.o. Pn�Et
1�v.�a o�
F[N. fL2
A
LEFT S1DE �LEVATfON
1JeP � ,,_a.
COP'RIGHIEO 20U8
iN15 ARCHI�CNRAL ORAIYiNG IS GI'YEN IN C9NfI�ENCE.
f10 USE OR DIS,SJ�,IINA710N FiAY BE MAOE YR7HpU7 PRIOR
� 45RIT'it;d CON5�'..t�7T �F itfE ARCHITECi. ALL CqNNON L4W
R(GH75 0+ COPYH(GHT AND 07HERWSE AR£ HEREBY
S4^ECIFICAi1Y RESEP.VEL1.
.. � ..... .. . . . .
RE,�R ���vaT�oN
,/e• _ ,._�.
E! �V. -t22'-0' �.
FR�NT r LEV,�iION
i/e' = r—e"
RGHT
��s° _ ,•—o
SIDE ELEVF�TION
_�� ��v. �+�2z�-n�° _
TA. P,if2ppE7�ir
aev. +���-a- �,
7.0.�
�R. o a �
K7M. FLN.
REv�s�an�s ev
1
i
i
o � �
� y �1
t0
� � ���
C U
Q1
V p' y p��
o '�'U O � [
M
2,,,
O� �
'O � S
T �
� yS
��
��
��f:flill,�?
;r,°, �
i i„i:N i!
- 1�44�,�.��1
i'i�i
ili��i;!; .
��il�'i;:ii��i
..'�li�il�lil�' � .
. i�lliii: !; ��
� �!ili�i-�i
' � I Cfu� li
��ii �6,
;�.119�(�
- I�ull�ii�
�iIIIG�` -
Im�mi
Q
�
� �
z °
� �
�
� �
� �
-1 W
......., p
m �
<
C.�
� �
� U
� � � Q
O �_!�
nW
U
J � �
� Q <C
�mQ�
C�7PYRIGHIW 20�'S
T}i15 ARCHI7EC7URAl �RAM7N3 I5 GIYEN IN i.ONFI�IENCE�
NO USE'0� Di�'iE1dMATiON tdAY BE A{qp� y/�7{WT PEiIOF
WRtYIEN CONSENT OF TNE pRCHitECT. AtL CONFiON IJ.Y7
N1CHi5 tlF COPYRIGHT .WD OTHERNISE ARE HEREBY
SPEi7FlCALLY fifSERVfD.
R.LV.L
ROOFfOP E U� IPt�ENT L�i�
/ �
ROCJF PL�N
,�6° � ,�-o-
�
�
a
n
\
w
a
O
J
N
J6!;MS
�M;E:rii�:m
er,�
TVO
R CF
u�m wuntA+�Tr.)
/ �
ROOFTOP EQUIPASfNT LOCATION
R�v�5:Cn5 BY
1
M
o �
� y 1
�Nyyb
.� C � 3'(.�
� � U
V N y �x�p
O 'O O �
c '
v� L
as a
` �e�
.�, � ,
��
5�
&�
RIUII�
�
n,���d
oiw;'
,iriw{
: IN7i
: ;oii�1
IIY�i '
" Itmw
!;Ilini
'; lo!
• �lil�li
��BD�� - �
uuui =
Q
�
U �
� o
— �
�
� �
� z
� �
m �
¢
c�
%` � �
�
O�`�"�
� -w
����
���
� �c ¢
c-- m n. c�
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Meeting Date: March 24, 2009
Date Prepared: March 10, 2009
Subject/Agenda Item:
CPTA-09-02-000016 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENT
A request by Urban Design Kilday Studios, agent for The Lester Family Investments, L.P. et al.
and Palm Beach County, for a text amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan to provide a
new subcategory to the existing Mixed Use Land Use designation for BioScience Mixed Use
Developments, and a City-initiated request to amend the notation on the City's Future Land Use
Map pertaining to the permitted land use densities and intensities established by Ordinance 7,
2005 for approximately 708.14 acres located south of Donald Ross Road, north of Hood Road,
and east and west of Interstate 95.
[X] Recommendation to APPROVE
[ ] Recommendation to DENY
Reviewed by: Originating Dept.: FINANCE: N/A LPA Commission
Growth Management: Action:
Planning Manager A roved
Natalie Wong, AICP Costs: $ N/A �� pP
Project Total [] App. w/ conditions
Manager [ ] Denied
City Attorney Natalie Wong, AICP � N�A [] Rec. approval
R. Max Lohman, Esq. Current FY [] Rec. app, w/ conds.
[ ] Rec. Denial
Development Compliance Funding Source: [] Continued to:
_N/A
Bahareh K. Wolfs, AICP � [] Operating
Advertised: [X] Other NA
Attachments:
Growth M ment • Location Map
Administrator Date: March 13, 2009 • Ordinance 7, 2005
Kara Irwin, AICP • Existing Future Land
Paper: Palm Beach Post Budget Acct.#: Use Iv1ap
NA • Proposed Future Land
[ ] Not Required Use Map
Approved by: • Traffic Equivalency
City Manager Affected parties: Statement
Ronald M. Ferris [ X] Notified • Ad
[] Not Required • Biotech article dated
9/26/03
[ ] None
Date Prepared: March 10, 2009
CPTA-09-02-000016
Page 2 of 15
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The subject request is a City-initiated petition to amend the notation on the City's Future Land
Use Map pertaining to the existing land use densities and intensities granted by Ordinance 7,
2005 consisting of approximately 708.14 acres located south of Donald Ross Road, north of
Hood Road, east and west of Interstate-95 ("I-95").
The petition also includes a request from Urban Design Kilday Studios, agent for The Lester
Family Investments, L.P. et al. and Palm Beach County, who have applied for a Comprehensive
Plan Text amendment to provide a new subcategory to the existing Mixed Use Land Use
designation for BioScience Mixed Use Developments ("MXD").
Subsection 380.06 (6), Florida Statues, establishes the process for processing a Development of
Regional Impact Application and concurrent Comprehensive Plan amendments. The proposed
Comprehensive Plan text and map amendments will be processed in accordance with these
established procedures.
The proposed Comprehensive Plan text amendment will provide an appropriate category to
meet the needs for the Scripps Phase II/Briger Development of Regional Impact ("DRI"). The
City-initiated amendment will clarify the existing distribution of the intensity caps established
currently noted on the Future Land Use Map for the Briger Tract and surrounding parcels. Staff
is recommending approval of the subject petitions.
MAP AMENDMENT OVERVIEW
On June 16, 2005, the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens approved Ordinance 7,
2005, a City-initiated request for an amendment to the Future Land Use Map of the City's
Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amendment modified the land use designations of
Residential Low (RL) and Commercial (C) for approximately 708 acres located immediately
east of the Florida Turnpike, north of Hood Road and south of Donald Ross Road. The densities
and intensities were limited to the following: 8 million square feet of Research and
Development (including a 300-bed research clinic); 1,000 multi-family workforce units; and
50,000 square feet of commercial or the equivalent thereof (Emphasis added).
On January 16, 2009, the City of Palm Beach Gardens received an Application for Development
Approval ("ADA") for a DRI for the Scripps Florida Phase II/Briger Tract Project ("Project").
The project area is a 681-acre mixed use development, and includes 1.6 million square feet of
biotech research and development for The Scripps Research Institute ("TSRI"), 2.4 million
square feet of related biotechnological/biomedical, pharmaceutical and ancillary uses, 500,000
square feet of commercial/retail, and 2,700 residential units. The proposed project is anticipated
to develop over a 20 year time frame.
The applicant for the Briger DRI has demonstrated that the proposed DRI intensities and
densities are within the limitations of Ordinance 7, 2005 based on an equivalency analysis
reviewed and approved by the City's traffic engineer (see attached). The existing notation on the
Future Land Use Map ("FLUM") will be updated to reflect the proposed program for DRI, which
will provide clarity and consistency between the Comprehensive Plan and the DRI.
Date Prepared: March 10, 2009
CPTA-09-02-000016
Page 3 of 15
Furthermore, since the proposed DRI includes only a portion of the area that was included with
Ordinance 7, 2005, iive (5) additional notations will be added to the FLUM to provide specific
intensity and density limitations (a/k/a "Cap") for the five (5) parcels that are currently subject to
Ordinance 7, 2005, but not part of the DRI. For the purposes of this report, these parcels will be
referred to as "outparcels". The cap for these outparcels will be reflected on the FLUM as
"MXD authorized uses producing a maximum of AM and PM Net New Peak
Hour Trips". A summary of each parcel, their size, and their respective trip distribution is
provided below.
STAFF ANALYSIS: MAP AMENDMENT
The area included in Ordinance 7, 2005 is currently serviced by the City of Palm Beach Gardens,
Seacoast Utility Authority, Solid Waste Authority and Northern Palm Beach County
Improvement District. The proposed modification to the notation on the FLUM will not create
any additional intensity, and the proposed new subcategory to the MXD land use category will
not create any new additional levels of services. However, as part of the application review
process, the applicant was required to demonstrate that the proposed program is within the
existing limitations of the land use cap.
The following chart demonstrates the trip equivalencies for the Briger DRI based on the existing
Cap from Ordinance 7, 2005 and the proposed DRI program:
Table 1: Briger Trip equivalency
The following chart demonstrates the additional trips to be distributed to the east and west
outparcels based on their appropriate acreage. These AM/PM peak hour trips will be reflected as
five (5) separate note amendments on the City's FLUM. A copy of the proposed FLUM is
attached to the staff report.
Table 2: Remaining trip distribution for 5 additional parcels under Ord. 7, 2005
Date Prepared: March 10, 2009
CPTA-09-02-000016
Page 4 of 15
TEXT AMENDMENT OVERVIEW
The City of Palm Beach Gardens has been committed to economic development by
accomplishing key initiatives, which include approving the creation of an Economic
Development Element of the Comprehensive Plan, creating the Bioscience Research Protection
Overlay (BRPO), establishing a Targeted Expedited Permitting Process (TEPP), and fostering
quality development to support Class A office and laboratories within the PGA Overlay.
The City's existing Economic Development Element encourages efforts to expand the economic
base of the City, in order to provide for value-added employment opportunities for City
residents, and to make the City a sustainable community where residents can live, work, learn,
and play.
The current tax base of the City reflects a dependence on residential tax assessments.
Approximately 80 percent of ad valorem taxes are generated by the residential component.
Currently, the City's land-use base is pre-dominantly residential (46 percent), which places a
heavy burden on residential tax payers to maintain all of the City's level of service standards.
The City continues to support opportunities for a diversified tax base that promotes a strong
economic environment that provides a job base for residents and a sustainable economy.
The proposed amendment to the Future Land Use Element would modify the existing MXD
designation to create a new category to allow for bioscience uses. Currently, the MXD
designation includes two (2) existing subcategories: Residential MXD's and Non-Residential
MXD's. The new subcategory would be geared toward bioscience users that would be reviewed
and regulated under appropriate standards that are not otherwise existing in the City's
Comprehensive Plan today. These proposed standards are necessary for the successful
recruitment of bioscience companies seeking to locate within the City of Palm Beach Gardens.
The proposed standards also provide for the ability for clustered design and critical mass to be
able to support public transit in the future. Therefore the proposed amendment furthers the
Goals, Objectives and Policies of the City's Comprehensive plan.
Below is the proposed amendment to Future Land Use Element Policy 1.1.1.15. The proposed
amendment is represented with underlines and °*r'�R�.
Policy I.I.1.15: Mixed Use Development (MXD):
The Mixed Use Development is designed for new development which is characterized by a
variety of integrated land use types. The intent of the category is to provide for a mixture of uses
on single parcels in order to develop sites which are sensitive to the surrounding uses, desired
character of the community, and the capacity of public facilities to serve proposed developments.
This future land use category is also intended to foster infill and redevelopment efforts, to deter
urban sprawl and to encourage new affordable housing oppo�tunities, as well as lessen the need
for additional vehicular trips through the internalization of trips within a neighborhood or
project. To create a functioning, multz faceted type of development, mixed use development is
dependent on the successful integration of distinct uses. Integration is defined as the combination
of distinct uses on single site where the impacts from differing uses aNe mitigation through site
design techniques, and where impacts from differing uses are expected to benefit from the close
immediate proximity of complementary uses. All requests for development approval based on
Date Prepared: March 10, 2009
CPTA-09-02-000016
Page 5 of 15
mixed use concept must be able to demonstrate functional hoNizontal integration of the allowable
uses, and where applicable, vertical integration as well.
The compatible zoning district for this category shall be the Mixed Use Development zoning
district. The Mixed Use Development category is a site specific designation and shall be have
frontage on at least one arterial. The following are the minimum criteria to be used for
development of sites designated as Mixed Use Development.
1. A Mixed Use Development shall be developed as a Planned Community District or a
Planned Unit Development. However, land development regulations adopted to
implement this Comprehensive Plan shall maintain mixed-use supplemental regulations
to provide further criteria for the development of sites with Mixed Use Development
Future Land Use categories, including parking requirements, permitted uses, setbacks
and other considerations.
2. Mixed Use Developments shall have frontage on at least one arterial. The City's
Conceptual Thoroughfare Plan shall be utilized to determine expansion of the roadway
network through the provision of new local streets which serve new neighborhoods in the
City's developing area.
3. Mixed Use Development shall include a minimum of two (2) of the other Future Land
Use Categories described in this element. Residential must be one of these uses, unless it
is determined by the City Council that the proposed development meets the criteria below
established to waive the residential requirement. No single use may compNise more than
60% of the area. Recognizing that mixed use projects have varying characteristics,
intensity measures are indicated below which provide flexibility in terms of minimum
land allocations. These intensity measu�es apply only within Mixed Use Development
projects. The City Council may waive the maximum nonresidential height limit for
employment center buildings located at the intersection of two arterials.
A. Criteria for a Non-Residential Mixed Use Development.•
The City Council may waive the mandatory residential requirement for any Mixed
Use Development that meets any two of the following conditions:
1. The parcel represents in-fill development and is surrounded on three sides by
non-residential land uses including man-made and natural barriers such as
canals and major arterial roadways.
2. The density/intensity of existing or future land uses zmmediately surrounding the
parcel are compatible with non-residential uses.
3. The adjacent surrounding planned and approved or existing built environment is
over 60% residential, and non-residential uses are determined to provide fo�
greater horizontal integration of uses.
Date Prepared: March 10, 2009
CPTA-09-02-000016
Page 6 of 15
4. Due to size or configuration of the parcel, the abilzty to provide an economically
feasible, sustainable, integrated residential component that functions to enhance
and complement the other Mixed Use Development uses is limited.
B. Gene�al Mixed Use Land Use Component Intensity Measures for Residential Mixed Use
Developments:
Land Use Component
Open Space
Neighborhood
Comme�cial
Residential High
Residential Low
Employment Center
Land Allocation
Min. 1 S%
Min. 2%
Max. 30%
Min. 20%
Max. 60%
Min. 0%
Max. 60%
Min. 2%
Max. 30%
Lot Coverage
Mc�. 70%
Max. SO%
Max. SO%
Max. 70%
Height
Max. 4 FL
Max. 4 FL
Max. 3 FL
Max. 4FL
In orde� to ensure that the combination of residential and commercial uses within the Mixed Use
Development will create an aesthetically pleasing and livable environment, the following criteria
provide guidance to property owners and develope�s of Mixed Use Developments.
1. Key design elements to consider are: compatibility with the existing architectural
character of the neighborhood; providing continuity of building scale and
archztectural massing; transitioning to adjacent developinents; providing
detailing treatment of the street-level and upper-level architecture; and using
buildings to define public spaces such as plazas, other open spaces and public
parking. Where there are multiple buildings in the Mixed Use Development, the
structure should be of varying heights to create visual interest from the street.
2. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) shall be utilized to
minimize opportunities for crime and to increase public safery.
3. The site and buildings shall be designed to provide direct and safe access between
the site and adjacent land uses in order to provide convenient and pleasant
pedestrian connectivity, and the site and building shall be built to a human scale
for pedestrian access, safety and comfort.
4. Open space shall be accessible to the public. In addition, the open space areas
should be surrounded by attractively designed buildings and landscaping
elements as well as uses that effectively shape and energize the open space so as
Date Prepared: March 10, 2009
CPTA-09-02-000016
Page 7 of 15
to create a focal point for activity. The location and design of open space is
cNitical to ensure quality of open space.
Special Definitions:
The Neighborhood Commercial land use component shall be used for communiry-
serving retail, service, office and business uses.
The Residential High and land use component in Mixed Use Development projects
shall have a maximum density of I S units/acre as a bonus for consideration of
planned, multi faceted development. The area allocated for Residential Low land and
Residential High land shall not exceed the 60% limitation, inclusive of both
residential types.
The Employment Center land use component shall be used for corporate offices,
Nesearch and educational facilities, light industry, hotels, warehousing, and similar
uses. Employment Center lots shall generally be grouped together.
The Open Space and Residential Low land use components are defined as set forth in
the Future Land Use Element, with the exception of special land allocation, lot
coverage and height requirements specified for Non-Residential Mixed Use
Developments.
C. General Mixed Use Land Use Component Intensity Measures for Non-Residential Mixed Use
Developments.
Land Use Components
Open Space
Commercial Recreation
Commercial
IndustNial
Institutional
Land Allocation
Min. 1 S%
Min. D%
Max. 30%
Min. 0%
Max. 60%
Min. 0%
Max. 60%
Min. 0%
Max. 60%
Lot Coverage Height
Max. 50%
Max. SO%
Max. 60%
Max. SO%
Professional Office Min. 2% Max. 70%
Max. 60%
Max. 4 FL
Max. 4 FL
�r : . , I
Max. 4 FL
Max. 4 FL
Date Prepared: March 10, 2009
CPTA-09-02-000016
Page 8 of 15
In oNder to ensure the combination of commercial uses within a Mixed Use Development will
c�eate an aesthetically pleasing and livable environment, the following criteria provide the
guidance to property owners and developers of Mixed Use Developments.
1. Key design elements to consider are: compatibility with the exzsting architectural
character of the surrounding neighborhood; providing continuity of building
scale and architectural massing; transitioning to adjacent developments;
providing detailed treatment of the street-level and upper-level aNChitecture; and
using buildings to define public spaces such as plazas, other open spaces and
public parking. Where there are multiple buildings in a Mixed Use Development,
the structure should be of va�ying heights to create visual inte�est from the street.
2. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) shall be utilized, and
encouraged to minimize opportunities for crime and to increase public safety.
3. The site and buildings shall be designed to provide direct and safe access between
the site and adjacent land uses in order to provide convenient and pleasant
pedestrian connectivity, and the site and building shall be built to a human scale
for pedestrian access, safety and comfort.
4. Open space shall be accessible to the public. In additzon, the open space areas
should be surrounded by attractively designed buildings and landscaping
elements as well as uses that effectively shape and eneNgize the open space so as
to create a focal point for activity. The location and design of open space is
crztical to ensuNe quality of open space.
Special Definitions:
Land Uses components such as Open Space, Commercial, Professional Office,
Residential High and Residential Low are defined as set forth in the Future Land Use
Element, with the exception of special land allocation, lot coverage and height
requirements specified for Non-Residential Mixed Use Developments.
The individual uses, buildings and/or development within Mixed Use Developments
shall include interconnecting pedestrian ways and plazas and shall provide
connections to the Parkway System. Non-residential uses shall have an internalized
relationship with the residential component and multi-modal accessibility.
D. General Mixed Use Land Use Component Intensitv Measures �'or BioScience Mixed Use
Develo mp ents:
A BioScience MXD shall include at a minimum, Open Space and BioScience and Research and
Development related uses. Uses within a BioScience MXD shall be located to encourage
clusterin� or the purposes o scientifc and economicallv productive exchange among
Nesearchers scientists administrators students and others involved in the BioScience industries
A BioScience MXD shall be designed to create an urban, pedestrian-oriented envi�onment;
provide for a mix of uses such as commercial, transportation, o�ce, laboratorv research,
Date Prepared: March 10, 2009
CPTA-09-02-000016
Page 9 of 15
educational and residential uses for the dailv needs of the residences and workforce; and
encoura�e walking biking� and other modes of non-vehicular transportation to reduce the need
,for local vehicular traffic.
Land Use Component
Ot�en Space
Commercial
Residential High
Residential Low
Employment Center
Land (Acres) Allocation
Min. 20%
Min. 2%
Max. 30%
Min. S%
Max. 40%
Min. 2%
Max. 40%
Min. 20%
Max. 60%
Lot Covera�e
Max. 70%
Max. SO%
Max. 50%
Max. 70%
HeiQht
Max. 4 FL
Max. 4 FL
Mc�. 3 FL
Max. 4 FL * *
** The hei�ht limit or Emplovment Center Buildin�(as de�ned below) located within the
BioScience MXD shall be a maximum o 1 SO feet if the Emplovment Center Building�s meet all of
the ollowin� criteria:
A. Located within the desig-nated BioScience Research Protection OveNlav ("BRPO ");
B. Include of a minimum of 100 conti�uous ac�es within the designated BRPO;
C. Located within a Development of Reg�ional Im�act;
D. Located east and immediatelv adjacent to Interstate 95;
E. Located on an existing undeveloped vacant parcel; and
Special De anitions:
Emplovment Center Buildings shall be defined as those buildings used for bioscience
technologv research and development, laborato�ies, corporate offices, medical offices,
research and educational facilities, light industrv, hospitals, and conference hotels.
STAFF ANALYSIS: TEXT AMENDMENT
In order to determine the potential impacts and benefits of the proposed Comprehensive Plan text
amendment, staff has reviewed which parcels, or group of parcels within an existing project,
could be eligible for the increased height based on the proposed criteria. The following map
illustrates all those parcels currently part of the City's BRPO Overlay:
Date Prepared: March 10, 2009
CPTA-09-02-000016
Page 10 of 15
Date Prepared: March 10, 2009
CPTA-09-02-000016
Page 11 of 15
The following table summarizes all those parcels within the BRPO and all the required criteria
listed within the proposed subcategory Bioscience MXD to qualify for the increased height of up
to 150 feet:
Table 3: Bioscience MXD criteria and eligible parcel within the BRPO.
Staff's review of the criteria illustrates that the only site that meets all the criteria currently in the
City that would allow for an increased height of 150' is within the Briger Tract DRI. Since the
Briger Tract is currently limited by the intensity cap, no additional density or intensity would be
permitted even with the additional height allowance.
ADDITIONAL HEIGHT OPTION FOR BIOSCIENCE MXD CATEGORY.•
The proposed additional criteria allows for an added height bonus of up to 150 feet for
employment center buildings, including research and development and biotech buildings. The
ability to provide an increased height allowance is extremely important for bioscience and
related uses. Please refer to the attached article dated September 26, 2003, that includes factors
to consider in the design of biotech buildings, including the need to have taller floor-to-floor
height requirements that range typically from 14-16 feet in height. The TSRI has speciiically
indicated that 150 feet is necessary to accommodate their desire for a proposed seven-story
biotech laboratory building on site, leaving room for a rooftop penthouse for the housing of
considerable rooftop mechanical equipment for the Scripps Phase II buildings. The additional
height allowance will provide a security measure to allow for the successful recruitment of other
biotech and research and development users to the Briger Tract.
Date Prepared: March 10, 2009
CPTA-09-02-000016
Page 12 of 15
Furthermore, the additional increased height allowance will allow for the ability to cluster
environmentally sensitive areas and open space. The two (2) existing MXD categories currently
include a 15% open space requirement. The proposed bioscience MXD cate�orv is the only
categorv that provides for a potential height increase for employment center buildin�s as defined
in the MXD bioscience subcate ory, and accordingly, the proposed code requirement for open
space is 20%.
The proposed MXD bioscience category also requires a minimum employment center land
allocation of 20%. The proposed Briger Tract DRI employment center area is 170 acres, and
therefore meets this land allocation. The minimum land allocation is intended to provide an
emphasis requirement on those uses that will provide value added employment, consistent with
the existing economic development goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan.
The additional height allowance will also provide opportunity to create density and critical mass
that is can sustain a pedestrian friendly environment suitable for mass transit and functional
urban design. It will also provide for consistency with the existing buildings and structures in
the immediate area. The existing 365,000 Phase I building, located on the Abacoa/Jupiter
immediately north of Donald Ross Road across from the BRPO area on the Briger Tract, is
approximately 134 ft. Therefore, any building to utilize the increased height allowance provided
for in the MXD bioscience category within the Briger Tract BRPO will be generally consistent
with the existing conditions in the area.
It is also important to note that a number of existing non residential buildings/structures within
the City that approach or exceed 150 feet including:
• Seacoast Water Tower —186.25 feet
• Marriot Hotel — 169 feet
• UBS Building —151.4 feet
• Admiralty Building —148 feet
• Merrill Lynch Building — 137.1 feet
• Doubletree Hotel — 92 feet
Finally, all development petitions proposing to utilize the increased height allowance will still
need to go through the zoning review process through the City of Palm Beach Gardens. As part
of that review, any potential negative impacts of the additional height to adjacent parcels will be
mitigated through design standards and compatibility standards. Concepts such as tiering,
increased setback standards, increased landscape buffers, building locations, and other design
considerations will be considered and utilized when reviewing zoning requests for how the
additional height could impact the adjacent parcels within the DRI.
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY WITH SURROUNDING AREA:
The MXD designation allows for a variety of uses, including research and light industrial,
research clinic, and residential uses. The proposed text amendment will not modify the existing
land use designation. The modification of the notation on the map is consistent with the existing
intensities of those listed in Ordinance 7, 2005.
Date Prepared: March 10, 2009
CPTA-09-02-000016
Page 13 of 15
CONSISTENCY WITH CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
The proposed text and map amendments are consistent with the overall intent of the Goals,
Objectives and Policies ("GOPs") contained within the City's Comprehensive Plan. The
following GOPs demonstrate this:
FUTURE LAND USE
GOAL 1.3.: CONTINUE TO PLAN FOR FUTURE NEEDS TO PROMOTE LIVIBLE
COMMUNITIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT FOR BIOSCIENCE USERS, TRANSIT ORIENTED
DEVELOPMENT, AND OTHER EFFORTS TO PROMOTE SUSTAINABLE GROWTH.
������
Objective 1.3.4.: Maintain a Bioscience Research Protection Overlay (BRPO) for the
purpose of promoting Bioscience Uses and deterring the conversion of those uses to
commercial or residential uses.
Policy 1.3.4.1.: Biosciences Uses shall be permitted and encouraged within the BRPO. The City
shall adopt by December 31, 2010 and maintain land development regulations which encourage
Bioscience Uses. The uses prohibited within the BRPO are those uses prohibited in the
underlying land use designation, excluding those uses set forth in the Bioscience Use definition.
The BRPO does not limit the uses currently allowed consistent with the property's existing land
use designation and zoning designation, including uses allowed pursuant to planned development
approvals and development of regional impact approvals.
Policy 1.3.4.2.: The City shall encourage Bioscience Uses within the BRPO to achieve, in
coordination with the County and adjacent municipalities, a clustering of Bioscience Uses and
thus promote intellectual exchange among researchers, scientists, students, and others in the
Bioscience industry workforce.
Policy 1.3.4.3.: By December 31, 2010, the City shall adopt and maintain land development
regulations that provide incentives for Bioscience development and encourage a predominance
of Bioscience Uses to develop a cluster of the industry within the BRPO.
Policy 1.3.4.4.: By December 31, 2010, the City shall adopt and maintain land development
regulations that do not permit rezoning of lands within the BRPO that would eliminate
Bioscience Uses without the vote of four members of the Palm Beach Gardens City Council. The
limitation on conversion of uses does not apply to permitted, conditional, and approved uses
allowed in a planned development and/or development of regional impact. Nothing in this policy
shall be interpreted to abrogate rights that have been vested under law for uses that are not
Bioscience Uses. The City land development regulations shall establish an administrative process
to review claims of vested rights under this policy.
Date Prepared: March 10, 2009
CPTA-09-02-000016
Page 14 of 15
Objective 6.1.8.: Maintain land development regulations which, in conjunction with the
efforts of other regulatory agencies having jurisdiction, ensure the protection and
preservation of native habitats, and maximize the provision of open space for this purpose.
Objective 13.1.1.: Balanced and Diversifed Economy
Palm Beach Gardens shall maintain and expand a diversified economy by encouraging growth in
targeted cluster industries that provide high-wage employment and complement changing
economic conditions by supporting existing business and by retaining and improving resource-
based sectors, such as tourism, retirement, and recreation.
Staff analysis: The Future Land Use, Conservation, and Economic Development Elements of the
City's Comprehensive Plan contain objectives and policies that support utilizing the land
development process in order to attract quality economic development. The additional increased
height allowance proposed in the BioScience MXD will provide for the ability to cluster
environmentally sensitive areas and open space. The additional height allowance will also
provide opportunity to create density and critical mass that is can sustain a pedestrian friendly
environment suitable for mass transit and functional urban design. The minimum land
allocation is intended to pNOVide an emphasis requirement on those uses that will provide value
added employment, consistent with the existing economic development goals and objectives of
the Comprehensive Plan.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE PALM BEACH COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Policy 2.9-e: The County shall adopt and maintain land development regulations that provide
incentives for bioscience development and promote a predominance of bioscience
research/biotechnology uses so as to develop a cluster of the industry in proximity to the TSRI
campus at Abacoa/Briger.
Policy 2.9-c: Within the Overlay, residential uses shall be prohibited and commercial uses shall
be prohibited unless clearly accessory or ancillary to bioscience research/biotechnology uses or
as have been or may be approved in connection with a land use mix for a planned development
and/or development of regional impact.
Staff analysis: The County's Comprehensive Plan contains policies that encourage the provision
of incentives to develop a cluste� of industry that would suppo�t the Scripps Research Institute
(TSRI) campus at Abacoa/Briger. The proposed BioScience MXD code is a direct incentive to
attract and promote bioscience research/biotechnology. The land allocations and the additional
height allowance pr�oposed in the Bioscience MXD code will provide the necessary framework to
successfully recruit biotech users. The proposed amendment is consistent with the County's
Comprehensive Plan.
CONSISTENCY WITH THE STRATEGIC REGIONAL POLICY PLAN
The proposed comprehensive plan amendments are consistent with the overall Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council's Strategic Regional Policy Plan. The Strategic Regional Policy Plan
supports economic development, specifically providing incentives that support the development
a cluster of industry to support the Scripps Research Institute (TSRI) campus at Abacoa/Briger.
Date Prepared: March 10, 2009
CPTA-09-02-000016
Page 15 of 15
NEARBY LOCAL GOVERNMENT COMMENTS/OBJECTIONS:
On March 12, 2009 the Palm Beach County Intergovernmental Plan Amendment Review
Committee (IPARC) received the proposed amendment and the City has received no objections
to date.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The proposed amendment is consistent with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, the State
Comprehensive Plan (i.e. Rule 9J-5, F.A.C, Rule 9J-11 F.A.C) and the City of Palm Beach
Gardens Comprehensive Plan and Code of Ordinances.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed land-use amendment petition CPTA-09-02-000016
based on the following findings of fact:
The proposed amendment is consistent with the existing Goals, Objectives, and Policies
of the City's Comprehensive Plan;
The proposed amendment is consistent with the existing Goals, Objectives and Policies
of the Treasure Coast Regional Council Strategic Policy Plan; and
The proposed amendment is consistent with the existing Goals, Objectives and Policies
of the State Comprehensive Plan.
`'``. � °'� w,� � ,�m � � � ' �'��`��'��'" '„�.�.' �t'�$�^'�� v€� % c ey � ,� t ` ; t�� �q „✓" _ .
�<�«u �. ! '�,..d l� �� '��,q Y�r`� ���� � � �P;1 � `� ' .a�iN�l ` t ��� ��`,
� �y � � �• � . `�, � . '`�` �` � g ��a'�� ,�
F� � �, � , � , ��" "� � � �r�� ��. € e� "����€ i : � '' �'�� " ��� �' �
� � ��y'� �f� �
�fkf 4 ; {, e��§ ° �e�4 �` �4�� � �� ,� � `� �%tib �y,: ���" �k f ����,�. � � � � ¢ �a�.J � �h
F s' '➢ ta
✓� �i . �� �a� tv ' ,� � �'�t e t� s��¢8 � ��-,�� � 4 r"�� ��i.�'� C�` i� ��., k .{;, g �.�`kS � � � �;a
�t���� �r�;�, '`az., ,i.f � e?�� t . P��y� µ 4 `� *a �
,� v � �y� g�x��„�, °°�j�"` �
��p � �( �'h:
�eF � � �� � "� ��* q�� � '��R'"Y�3� � �� �2� ��
� � ��� ,� .�:k � +�� F n , �t tt a �� i c � .� ' .„,� k �
a � r � � � z 6Y � � ?'ek . �2y 's� ��, � a �$ » t z � �'? 1 � .3��-�` `�u�i
r -{�
�`�`` � %� r.+e �'�$ a�� � i� " a�°c.�»�•�` w�°8�i � ��'" ; "t" � ��* it ��� .E � ���� �' E � ��" S � �'�
���� ��, V � ' �.�� '` � � }.�����.��a �� ..y�r} 1�����`��� A�,«
�� ',� � �� ' � �'€� � �` ' ��,`��� �� � �� �� �� ��� ��� �, � p � } � '°.�'�°
g �:fK�^���k �s��f ? f Si `w� �3dF� ..Y¢ s��3.` k'7� '�,}��P f f� �' ��w.
{ � � "`a"`"FYr" �g. . � � �" '. s�k � `�.'"_"° ., �� :� 't,�.� x� �ru *� y w .� � _ .. v
� € ii
� �� '� 3� '� `�' . ,�"3
+ � t � •
a
� � a�` � � .g�t ru � r ` �� s � � - � . � : : .�7 . '�.�"�� a�, ¢ t` . '
�
� pe ». � �� �� {. � �4 � � ` 6� �a .�«^,..*w i"s�� ., ��� . f. `.���I
� ``������ � ��,.� � �" °�s,�^���'��'4 46+t3$ -� ��c .� r � � t ..{.
� � �,.�� °� � � ���� � ��F��.�� �a� . � �" � �°f�: ���. f ..�
( � °� �( ���E"� 6 i$ ���� � �� � �
Y�Y ��✓ � �� :,� /sa eY�`�� a,� � x g�'���.� F9 e dr'i . � r...
f? �
,�'' +� '�,w�, _ r �� �, s,�� xr *` g�'. .��, �.,� _�,� �,� � �,�a � � .
�������� w �� � gs � �^' � �• �� ts�g+°� ` `� �°�.s r +r�. � rx ��re - �g� .a"�r
� �&..�..��'' '°. . o-�?�i�•N. � �. ... ..'P'�erEV'rP-*z.R�.. �' e�. ��° >�. � t. :., . . . � :�.!. `�. � �.>�_ �.i �� �r� .�. ..o c ����ts ��'�
�-
� � ��. �� j ��
4�
�.. °�� '.�:. � ' �� ... b ^� '� & � �t
�, _ � t; �� ��'.��
w,.�, s
� 3 r � �
�v ti �
� � � ' � � �
�s. a� � �""^�t s�+�k"'"�g
�i�� �g�
�� . ';�� � "�
,
�� `
..: � 2 c : s. '
i
z��
� 9 c+�� SC�`i�� �� r�`i � �
�"V � �� ��;� . . '�� �
$ �+� ��
�� �. �
� �Y �
��-��i'"��y �'�_�.-', ' � �
�.
�� ����,�
z�
�' � � ��„
�� ��... . . . . .
�, �'� ��_ ov".�'y� ����.
j £\
g �
i
v �� , . ��';; _.
u,, . .. --�-' ,-� `:» .,,.� ..
� �
� # t
� �`��
�,,-
� ��� A
�
.R ��� .
� ���' � �
� ,�
� � � Y�`r"
�.� �
/ ... "l�. � � � � , :
s t, 3's
Ye �
�
� �x�
r ,
� , r,� e.i� � ,�i '�^ ,
e R � �. ,�� `� � .
� � i. �'�'� pt
� ��f s ,
�a' �i ti � �..�;
� .. . ��,. rt,. �r, :�,,,...�_ � �.� �
� ��e�,. ,
� .� . �"�,
�, �
i� � ��
��
��� �'" ��° �'' ,�"�:.
�� ,��t � ,�x �
2
4
6
7
10
11
12
l3
14
15
16
Date Prepa�ed: January 13, 2005
ORDINANCE 7, 2005
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR A LAND-USE MAP
AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY �F
PALM BEACH GARDENS REL.ATING TO CERTAIN PROPERTIES
CON51ST1NG �F APPROXIMATEL.Y 708.14 ACRES, GENERALLY
LOCATED AT THE NORTH EAST SIDE OF THE INTERSECTlON OF
HOOD ROAD AND THE FLORIDA TURNPIKE AND SOUTH �F
DONAi.D ROSS ROAD, COMMONLY REFERRED TO AS "BRtGER
TRACT," TO CHANGE THE LAND-USE DESIGNATION FROM
COMMERCtAL (C) AND RESIDENTIAL LOW (RL) LAND-USE
DESIGNATION TO MIXED-USE (MXD) LAND-USE DESIGNATION;
AND PROVIDING AN EF�ECTIVE DATE.
17
18 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Pafm Beach Gardens authorized the
19 staff to initiate comprehensive plan amendments necessary to effectuate the City's
20 economic development goals and objectives; and
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to the Future Land-Use Map amendment
furthers the goals, objectives, and policies of the recent{y-adopted Economic
Development Element; and
WHEREAS, fihe City Council adopted the City ofi Palm Beach Gardens
Comprehensive Plan on January 4, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the City is proposing to madify"the future land use designation from
its current Commercial (C) and Residential Low (RL) land use designations to Mixed-
Use (MXD) land use designation of a 708;14-acre, more or less, parcel known as the
"Briger Tract," lacated at the northeast �orner of the intersection of Hood Road and the
Fforida Turnpike, immediately south of-'Donald Ross Road; and
35 WHEREAS, the Brig�r firact was annexed inta the City of Palm Beach Gardens
36 from unincorporated Patm Beach County through Ordinance 16,1990; and
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
WHEREAS, the Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board, as the duly constituted
Lacal Planning Agency for the City, conducted the required public hearing on February
8, 2005, after due notice and has made its recommendations to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City: Gouncil finds that the subject amendment is consistent with
Sections 163.3184 and 163.31$7, Florida Statutes; and
Date Prepared: January 13, 2005
Ordinance 7, 2005
1 WHEREAS, the City Council acknowledges that this amendment is subject to the
2 provisions of Sections 163.3184(9) and 163.3189, Florida Statutes, and that the City
3 shall maintain compliance with all provisions thereof; and
4
5 WHEREAS, the City has received public input and participation through public
6 hearings before the Local Planning Agency and the City Council in accordance with
7 Section 163.3181, Florida Statutes; and
8
9 WHEREAS, after due notice and public hearing, the City Council of the City of
10 Palm Beach Gardens deems it in the best interest of the present and future residents of
ll the City of Paim Beach Gardens that the proposed Cornprehensive Plan Amendment
12 be adopted.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
N�W, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL,ORIDA that:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and ratified.
SECTION 2. The Future l.and Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of
Palm Beach Gardens is hereby amended to change the future land-use designation for
the following described 708.14-acre property, generally located immediately east of the
Florida Turnpike, north of Hood Road, and south of Donald Ross Road, from a
Commercial (C) and Residential Low (RL) land-use designation to a Mixed-Use (MXD)
land-use designation limited to 8 million square feet of Research and Development
(including a 300-bed researc�i clinic), 1,000 multi-family workforce units, and 50,000
square feet of commercial or the equivalent thereof:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
THAT PORTION OF SECTIONS 26 AND 35 IN TOWNSHIP 41 SOUTH, RANGE 42
EAST, IN PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL.ORIDA, DESCRIBED IN PARCELS AS
FO�LOWS:
PARCEL 1: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 26;
THENCE S 01°20'0�" W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION A DISTANCE
Of 75.02 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND SOUTHERLY 75.00
FEET FROM THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT
OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT A�SO BEING ON THE SOUTH L.INE OF DONALD
ROSS ROAD; THENCE S 01 °20'00" W ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF
2,544.68 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER
OF SAID SECTION 26; THENCE S 01°17'04" W ALONG SAID EAST LINE A
DISTANCE OF 2,619.78 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION
35; THENCE S 00°47'26" W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 35 A
DISTANCE OF 1,373.01 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF HOOD ROAD; THENCE N
8°06'39" W AI.ONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 639.82 FEET TO THE EAST
1
2
3
4
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
za
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Date Prepared: January 13, 2005
Ordinance 7, 2005
LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN B(2) IN THE ORDER OF TAKING REC�RDED
IN OFF(CIAL RECORD B�OK 4296, PAGE 1151 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF
PALM BEACH COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID B(2) N
01 °53'21" E A DISTANCE OF 70.00 FEET; THENCE N 88°06'39" W A DiSTANCE OF
32.20 FEET; THENCE N 83°32'10" W A DISTANCE 4F 52.96 FEET; THENCE N
01°53'21" E A DISTANCE OF 15.OQ FEET; THENCE N 83°32'10" W A DISTANCE OF
140.45 FEET; THENCE S 01°53'21" W A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE N
83°32'10" W A DISTANCE OF 308.19 FEET; THENCE N 88°06'39" W A DISTANCE
OF 117.30 FEET; THENCE N 00°48'46" E A DISTANCE OF 291.35 FEET;
THENCE N$9°11'14" W A DISTANCE OF 7Q.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST
CORNER UF SAID B(2) BEiNG ALSO ON THE WEST LINE �F THE EAST 40.00
FEET OF THE NOF2THWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SA1D
SECTION 35; THENCE N 00°48'46" E ALONG SA1D WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF
941.91 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE N 89°25'19" W
ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 658.25 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF
THE EAST 40.00 FEET OF THE W�ST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE S 00°49'27" W
AL4NG SAiD WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 459.48 FEET {CALCULATED TO BE S
00°Z9'47" W 540.34') TO THE NORTHEAST LINE OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN A
(1) OF SAID ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN SAID OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
4296, PAGE 1151; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEI� A(1) N
28°00'42" W A DISTANCE OF 625.78 FEET (CALCULATED TO BE S 28°00'42" W
615.60') TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE N 28°00'42" W
ALONG SAID BOUNDARY A DlSTANCE OF 3,541.97 FEET; THENCE N 24°00'40" W
ALONG SAID BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 546.71 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A
CURVE THEREIN CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, HAVING A RADIUS OF 5,635.58
FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY A DISTANCE OF 544.10 FEET ALONG SAID
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 05°31'S4"; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG
SAID BOUNDARY N 18°28'47" W A DISTANCE OF 543.08 FEET; THENCE N
14°39'55" W A DISTANCE OF 177.27 FEET; THENCE N 11°28'43" E A DISTANCE OF
190.38 FEET; THENCE N 63°46'49" E A DISTANCE OF 190.36 FEET; THENCE N
89°55'06" E A DISTANCE OF 301.8$ FEET; THENCE N 87°37'31" E A DISTANCE OF
296.35 FEET; THENCE N 89°55'25" E A DISTANCE OF 302.02 FEET; THENCE N
00°04'35" W A DISTANCE OF 6.OQ FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF
THE LAND DESCRIBED IN B(3) IN SAID ORDER OF TAKING; THENCE ALONG
THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID B(3) N 89°55'25" E A DISTANCE OF 514.52 FEET;
THENCE N 82°47'55" E A DISTANCE OF 201.56 FEET TO SAID LINE PARALLEL
WITH AND SOUTHERLY 75.00 FEET FROM THE N�RTH LINE OF SAID SECTION
26; THENCE N 89°55'25" E ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE A DISTANCE OF 242.59
FEET; THENCE N 89°55'10" E ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE, A DISTANCE OF
2,668.72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTA(NING 475.69 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
PARCEL 2: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 26;
THENCE N 00°36'10" E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAfD SECTION A DISTANCE
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
4S
46
Date Prepared: January 13, 2005
Ordinance 7, 2005
OF 4,365.77 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE LAND
DESCRIBED AS A(1) IN THE ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN OFFICIAL
RECORD BOOK 4296, PAGE 1151 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID PALM
BEACH COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY S 34°24'11" E A DISTANCE
OF 112.84 FEET; THENCE S 33°15'24" E A DISTANCE OF 493.78 FEET ALONG
SA1D BOUNDARY TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE THEREIN, CONCAVE
SOUTHWESTERE.Y, HAVING A RADIUS O� 11,365.16 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY A DtSTANCE OF 813.16 FEET ALONG SAID CIJRVE THROUGH
A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 04°05'58"; THENCE S 29°09'26" E A DISTANCE OF 1,199.39
FEET; THENCE S 2$°00'42" E AL.ONG SAID BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 2,426.49
FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SA1D SECTION 26; THENCE CONTINUE S 28°00'42"
E ALONG SAID BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 1,464.33 FEET; THENCE N$9°03'55"
W ALONG SAID BOUNDARY AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE LAND
DESCRIBED !N B(1) OF SAID ORDER OF TAKING, A DISTANCE OF 339.11 FEET;
THENCE S 86°53'19" W ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 401.53 FEET
TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF HOOD ROAD; THENCE N 88°06`39" W ALONG SAID
NORTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 518.02 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 35; THENCE N 00°50'24" E ALONG SAID EAST LINE
A DISTANCE OF 627.76 FEET T� THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SA4D
SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE N 89°02'58" W A DISTANCE OF 658.30 FEET
TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAIQ SOUTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE S
00°50'39" W AL4NG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER A
DISTANCE OF 616.97 FEET TO SAID NORTH LINE OF HOOD ROAD; THENCE N
88°06'39" W ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 643.06 FEET; THENCE N
89°03'24" W ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 673.72 FEET TO THE
WEST LINE OF SAID SECTI(JN 35; THENCE N 00°51'10" E ALONG SAID WEST
LINE A DISTANCE OF 9,263.58 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTA1NfNG 206.94 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
TOGETHER WITH:
THE EAST 40 FEET OF THE WEST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 41 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, LESS
THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO COUNTY OF PALM BEACH FOR ROAD RIGHT-OF-
WAY FOR HOOD ROAD IN DEED BOOK 1142, PAGE 337, PUBLIC RECORDS OF
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
CONTAINING 0.538 ACRES.
TOGETHER WITH;
THE WEST 250 FEET OF THE EAST 290 FEET OF THE SOUTH 330 FEET
THEREOF, LESS THAT PART IN HOOD ROAD;
4
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
zs
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
3b
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
4S
46
date Prepared: January 13, 2005
Ordinance 7, 2005
TOGETHER WITH:
ALL THAT PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHEAST 1/4 �F SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 41 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM
BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYiNG NORTN OF THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
OF HOOD ROAD, LESS AND EXCEPTING THERE FROM:
THE EAST 40 FEET THEREOF, AND
COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER 4F THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE
NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 41 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST;
THENCE RUN N 88°07'24" W, A DISTANCE OF 1,266.77 FEET TO THE POINT 0�
BEG4NN{NG OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY; THENCE N 01°52'36" E, A
DISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET; THENCE N 88°07'24" W, A DISTANCE OF 340.26 FEET;
THENCE N 28°00'12" W, A DISTANCE OF 1,477.07 FEET; THENCE N 89°24'43" W,
A DISTANCE OF 423.66 FEET; THENCE S 28°00'12" E, A DISTANCE OF 1,465.33
FEET; THENCE N 89°04'42" W, A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET; THENCE S 01°52'36"
W, A DISTANCE OF 227.32 FEET; THENCE S 88°07'24" E, A DISTANCE OF 332.50
FEET; THENCE S 28°00'12" E, A DISTANCE OF 1,380.87 FEET; THENCE S
87°56'10" E, A DISTANCE OF 429.84 FEET; THENCE N 28°QO'12" W, A DISTANCE
OF 1,365.72 FEET; THENCE N 89°00'S1" E, A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET; THENCE
N 0'I°52'36" E, A DISTANCE OF 154.56 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGiNNING.
CONTAINING 13.96 ACRES.
TOGETHER WITH:
THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 O� THE NORTHEAST 1l4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF
SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 41 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA, L.ESS AND EXCEPT RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR HOOD ROAD.
CONTAINING 9.42 ACRES.
THE ABUVE-DESCRIBED PARCELS OF LAND CONTAIN AN AREA OF 708.14
ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SECTION 3, The City's Growth Management Administrator is hereby directed to
#ransmit the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment and supporting data, analysis,
and other relevant material, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, to the Department of
Community Affairs of the State of Florida and other appropriate public agencies, and
upon adoption of this Ordinance is fiurther directed to ensure that this Ordinance and all
other necessary documents are forwarded to the Florida Department of Community
Affairs and other agencies in accordance with Seetion 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Date Prepared: January 13, 2005
Ordinance 7, 2005
SECTION 4. The effective date of this pian amendment shall be the date a final
order is issued by the Department of Community Affairs or Adrninistration Commission
finding the amendment in campliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(1)(b),
Florida Statutes, whichever is applicable. If a final order of noncampliance is issued by
the Administration Commission, this amendment may nevertheless be made effective
by adoption of a resolution affirming its effective status, a copy of which resolution sha{I
be sent to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Division of Community
Planning, Plan Processing Team. An adopted amendment whose effective date is
delayed by law shall be considered part of the adopted plan until determined to be not
in compliance by final order of the Administration Commission. Then, it shall no longer
be part of the adopted plan unless the local government adopts a resolution affirming its
effectiveness in the manner provided by law.
(The remainder of this page left intentionally blank)
C�
Date Prepared: January 13, 2005
Ordinance 7, 2005
.7�
1 PASSED this ��day of ��312V �y , 2005, upon first reading.
2
3 PASSED AND ADOPTED this �(��day of �� vrv �l , 2005, upon
4 second and finai reading.
5
b
7 CITY OF PAL B�CH A DENS FOR AGAINST ABSENT
8
9
10 BY: ✓
11 J h ay
12 -^
13 � :/
14 ri ' , ' ayo
15
16 ��� ./
17 David , Councilm mber
18 _/ i
19 (� ✓�
20 -,al . V che, ouncilmember
21
22 �
23 Jody Ba e, ncilmember
24
25
26 ATTEST;
27
28
29 BY:
30 Patricia Snider, CM
31 City Clerk
32
33
34 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
35 LEGAL SUFFIGIENCY
36
37 ' , �._,L--
38 , BY: • �l
39 Christine P. Tatum, City Attomey
40
41
42
43
44
45
46 G:\attorney_share\ORDINANCESICOMP PLAN - FLUM flnal-ord 7 2005.doc
7
TABLE 1
TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS - BUILDOUT SCENARIO
OKDINANCE 7, 2005
AM PEAK HOUR
PM PEAK HOUR
(1) Palm Beach County Rates except where noted. ��� LY �� i\.i '
� , ..i� L „ .1. �I
(2) Trip generation rate of 0.981 Irips per 1,000 squaze feet based on Briger DRI methodoLogy 2009.
(3) Trip generation rate of 0.807 trips per 1,000 squaze feet based on Briger DRI methodology 2009.
F1FLi06344Mi06344M 45 Bnger T2ctlComp PIanlTrip Gen JPK 030409.x1s
Analyst JPK
Date Mar-09
Land Use A: Research and Development Cenfe�
I7E Land Use Code 760
Enterfrom Extemal Size 8,000,000 SF
6467
f-
_� Total Iniemal Extemal
� Enter �:6513��. 46 6467
Exit i334 45 1289
ErRtoE#emal Total � 7847 91 7756
1289 % 100% 1.2% 98.8% `�
Demand
f. 20%�'�. 267
Balanced
13
Demand
,; .40%.:� 13
Enter from Extemal
11
-►
Erit to Extemal
11
Demand
�,10%'�: 651
Ba/anced
�
Demand �7
�;.:10%'�.: � I
TABLE 2
AM PEAK HOUR INTERNAL CAPTURE CALCULATION
ORDINANCE 7, 2005
Demand Ba/anced Demand
15%+, 977 34 10%;; 34
Name of Devlpt Briger Tract - Ord 7, 2005
Time Period Buidlouf - AM Peak Hour
Land Use 8: Residential
ITE Land Use Code 21Q230
Size 1,000 DU Enterfrom Extemal
Demand Ba/anced Demand
15%, 200 �8 10%;', 8
Demand
1�%, 51
Balanced
0
10%'; 133 Demand
Balanced 25°/,',' 8
24
Deman
10% 24
Demand
Balanced
10
D�emand \\ Demanmd
10% 8 10% 10
Balanced
�
Land Use C: Shopping Center Demand
30%i 6
and Use Code 820
Size 50,000 SF Demand Balanced Demand
z�'r � 0 z�f�: 2
Intemal
21
9
30
Demand Balanced Demand
2%:': 0 �0 . 2%`, 5
Net Exferna! Trips for Mulfi-Use Deve/opment
Land Land Land Lanc
Use Use Use Use
Intemal
Source: McMahon Associates, Inc. based on Temp/ates from the ITE Tiip Generation Handbook, Chapter 7, March 2001
F:IFL106344M106344M 45 Briger TracflComp PlanlAM Peak Hour lntemalization.xls
Demand
! 2%i 7
Ba/anced
�
Demand
` 2%; 5
68
.�
-►
Exitto Extema/
293
Demand
2%; 2
Balanced
0
Demand
2%'; 2
nd Use D: Hospital I I
�
ITE Land Use Code 6i0
Size 300 Beds Enter from Eatemal
208
Total Infernal 6cternal �
Enter ' :237�: 29� 208 _�
Exit ��:102 13 89
Total �� 339 41 298 Exit to Extemal
% 100% � 12.2% 87.8% 89
s U�
� 4RkM5fORTA9'IQNE3dfi1NEER5&�:PiANA1FR5
TABLE 3
PM PEAK HOUR INTERNAL CAPTURE CALCULATION
ORDINANCE 7, 2005
Analyst JPiC
Daie Mar-09
Name of Devlpt Bnger Tract - Ord 7, 2005
Time Period Burldout - PM Peak Hour
Land Use A: Research and Development Center Land Use e: Residential
Ente�bom Exfemal
904
�
Exit to 6:temal
5363
Demand
� 20%S 1,098
Balanced
7s
Demand
40�; 76
� .rui il bz � �►
!TE Land Use Code 820
Enter trom Extemal Size 50,000 SF Demand Balanced Demand
83 :2%�:: 4 �4 2%-' S
_� Tota/ Intemal Extemal �
Enter 190��. 107 83
Erit 206:. 59 147
ExittoExtemal Total 396 166 230 Demand Ba/anced Demand
147 % 100% 42.0% 58.0% j2%J 4 3� 2%�: 3
NetExternal Trips forMulti-Use
Use I I Use I I Use
Sourc�: McMahon Associates, Inc. based on Temp/ates irom the ITE rrip 6eneratron Handbook, Chapter 7, Ma�ch 2001
F:IFL106344M106344M 45 Bnger TractlComp PIanIPMPeakHourintemaliza6on.xls
Use
Land Use Code 6>0
Size 300 Bed:
Enter from Extemal
273
� `
Frit to Extemaf
134
Demand
2%! 7
Balanced
0
Demand
2%u 5
Enter from Eztemal
120
t-
E�rit to 6ctemal
216
:��: m
� � TkRNSPCRTAttON £Pd6liJEER$ $ pRANitlEP¢
TABLE 4
PEAK HOUR TRIP CALCULATION
ORDINANCE 7, 2005
* Adopted ordinance trips remaining after subtracting Briger DRI
�.�'�,�.��(�N
** Vehicle trip taken from Susan O'Rourke February 27, 2009 Report �,,.,`.
TABLE 5
TRIP GENERATION ANALYSIS
MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT FOR EACH INDIVIDUAL LAND USE BASED ON ORDINANCE 7, 2005 CAPPED TRIPS LESS BRIGER DRI
"' Uses Briger DRI Trips that were calculated as per DRI methodology (calculated without office & R&D pass-by and 25% retarl pass-by) �
', PM peak hour constraint of 955 trips as per Table 4 y,,,,,,,.,,
TABLE 6
PROPORTIONATE PEAK HOUR TRIPS
ORDINANCE 7, 2005
_ __ _ _ _ _ _
* Parcels remaining from Ordinance 7, 2005 (not including Briger DRI Parcels) ���y�.����
� ..��: ... . _ � . �
'F*Adopted ordinance trips remaining after subtracting Sriger
N� ��
c�� -
�� �o°I
�l�`�l
Biotech real estate needs are highly specialized - Puget Sound Business Journal (Seattle): Page 1 of 2
Members; L� � Not ReglsCered? Reaister for free extra services.
Puget Sound Business Joumal (Seattle) - September 29, 2003
1s eattlelsto ri es/200 �/09/29/foc u s 12. htm I
�13 l".�� A��..�. � ������
I31f+3izt�s Lca ir. (3tL7t,
Friday, September 26, 2003
Biotech real estate needs are highly specialized
Pug�t Sound Business Journai (Seattle) - by Garv Blakeslee
With the recent growth of Seattle's biotech industry, many of today's local reai estate developers are quickly discovering the significant
differences between creating state-of-the-art biotech buildings and traditional office projects.
Commercial developers are increasingly using personalized techniques to address a wide range of challenges exclusive to the biotech-
development process. These tailored methods are often the result of ongoing, strategic input provided by the development team, in
addition to the real estate industry's greater realization of biotech's highly specialized workplace.
The distinction between biotech and traditional office development begins with the constantly changing requirements of high-tech
research space. These dedicated needs, in fact, are predicated by the types of people who occupy today's state-of-the-art biotech buildings.
Creating space for biotech, more than other industries, is an immensely people-driven development activity. And doing it successfully
requires that developers have a thorough understanding of today's biotech scientist, as well as the kinds of research work they conduct on
any given day.
Unlike standard off'ice tenants -- who typically require room for cubicles, executive management offices and administrative and common
areas -- scientists have considerably more complex space needs. These "creative-class" professionals require e�ctremely efficient structures
with specialized labs and procedure areas where critical research will happen. Most important for the developer, these needs tend to
change over time, often during the building's actual development lifecycle.
For example, scientists and other staff inembers that may be originally anticipated for a new biotech building can change positions, or
even companies, during the development process. That's a significant development given the specialized nature of biotech's space design.
Additionally, the development process itself sometimes attracts new scientists, which requires additional revision to the development
plan.
Research procedures once planned for the project can be altered, too, due to new scientific discoveries or other logistical factors that
necessitate an immediate change in architectural plans for the building being developed.
Biotech development also can be volatile from a financial perspective. Many biotech organizations depend on short-term public and
private grants to fund their research initiatives. Unforeseen changes in space requirements can occur when grant sources, FDA approvals,
or venture capital support takes a turn for the worse.
r1 �aex .�sonalized a�proach
As a result of the unpredictable, complex nature of the biotech industry, today's biotech buildings must be conceived, from the beginning,
in a way that allows developers to respond to frequent changes among scientists and their specialized space requirements.
So, rather than applying traditional space-design formulas created for the commercial office environment, many biotech developers now
are basing their building designs instead on best solutions to real estate program requirements. They're taking a less formulaic and
decidedly more programmatic approach to biotech development.
But doing so requires developers to have a clearer picture of how biotech researchers function in their space. Developers must make
efforts to understand how they can provide better, more specialized space that helps to accelerate important, life-saving biotech research.
t:,r�llx�t�o�•ate carl;v axxd oftet�
Many local developers are collaborating with the entire biotech development team -- including scientists, architects, engineers, fnanciers,
building contractors and commercial real estate brokers, to name a few -- with the goal of creating customized development solutions that
ensure a project's success. While team collaboration is not unusual for standard office developments, communication is considerably
more intensive and frequent in the biotech-development environment.
By familiarizing themselves with scientists and their day-to-day technical and aesthetic needs, developers are able to work more
effectively -- and proactively -- with the project architects and other team members to respond to and anticipate each tenant's unique
space requirements.
Spc.cial physical neecLs
This creative, individualized approach is becoming necessary simply because no one biotech project is exactly like the next. Some of the
most fundamental distinctions are physical. Unlike the typical office building, a biotech structure has higher floor-to-floor dimensional
requirements. In fact, it can be built with as much as five feet of additional ceiling height per story to accommodate mechanical equipment
critical to biotech research and development activities.
http://www.bizjournals.com/seattle/stories/2003/09/29/focusl2.html?t=printable 3/19/2009
Biotech real estate needs are highly specialized - Puget Sound Business Journal (Seattle): Page 2 of 2
Intricate ventilation and plumbing systems enable biotech buildings to achieve proper supply and exhaust of air and appropriately
dispose of waste material generated within the highly complex lab environment. These complex systems enable biotech buildings to
maintain the necessary balance between supply- and exhaust-capacity, as well as the consumption of energy.
As a result of these physical allowances, increased floor-to-floor heights diminish the total number of floors that a biotech building can
have and, thereafter, the total square feet available for rent. Fixed costs like land, architectural design and permitting then must somehow
be spread over fewer areas of rentable space in order to avoid substantial increases in rental rates for the biotech tenant.
Scientific instrumentation is increasingly more sensitive to vibration due to the molecular level of research being conducted. Biotech
buildings therefore are more robust from a structural standpoint, using significantly greater amounts of concrete and steel than the
typical office tower. A stiffer building minimizes vibration from both internal and e3cternal sources, a major concern for scientists
conducting lab experiments with e�ctremely low tolerances for sound and other environmentally based vibrations.
Sp.�ce fcsr c�>Itatr€�ra�tiai�
Collaboration is important to the biotech industry, too. Scientists regularly share information with other biotech professionals around the
world in order to push the envelope of research data and discoveries. Given this need, developers are now creating special features that
help encourage collaborative-based activities in and around their biotech projects.
For instance, some developers now include ground-floor retail components to biotech buildings, an idea seldom considered in past
developments. The street-level retail helps to animate the project's edges and, most important, provide places for biotech professionals to
gather and share ideas with fellow employees or members of other local research organizations.
Exterior animation also helps to engage the surrounding community.
Similarly, biotech buildings are increasingly being located near universities and other areas where biotech-research "players" can be
typically found. Since biotech is a profession that requires around-the-clock attention to its research endeavors, many projects are being
developed within walking distance to work-force housing. Biotech has become a work-live-piay industry aligned more closely with the
24/� urban community.
liiotec:ii fi•oxn'the in.side c>u.t
The same ldnds of collaborative efforts are being made for the buildings' interiors. Architects and developers are working closely
alongside biotech professionals to create space that provides places for creative thought and discussion related to the project's planned
research programs.
If the developer knows immediately that a tenant has recently de-emphasized a particular researeh project or product development
efforts, the architect can quickly revise building plans without investing significant time on the previous design schematic. These types of
early-stage changes can mean considerable cost-savings for the tenant and, ultimately, better utilization of its internal project space.
Additionally, by engaging the intellectual resources offered by the entire biotech development team, developers can be more adept at
identifying sales tax relief, federal subsidies, architectural economies of scale, and other creative cost-cutting mechanisms that help offset
rents and other costs inherent to biotech development.
Today, commercial real estate companies realize that creating biotech buildings is considerably more tenant-driven than developing other
commercial real estate products. Research facilities, by nature, carry more risk than a typical office development. And they require greater
understanding of the particular nuances that can make the biotech environment highly productive and increasingly cost-efficient.
Team members within the development community who avail themselves to the vast knowledge of the biotech tenant and seek to
coliaborate frequently with the research community will find themselves in higher demand by clients and at the forefront of biotech
development marketplace.
GARYBLAKESLEE is a deuelopment manager atfull-seruice real estate deuelopment company Harbor Properties. Gary heads day-to-
day deuelopment efforts for Harbor's newest biotech project at 30� Westlake. Information is auailable at www.harborproperties.com.
All contents of this site OO American City Business Journals Inc. All rights reserved.
http://www.bizj ournals.com/seattle/stories/2003/09/29/focus 12.htm1?t=printable 3/19/2009
. ... .. _ „ . . �;��.:, _._, .. _. . .. .. .. .
�y����������� <t' ` �. �. � '
.� .;������������������������� _- gg ► +���J;�. . LL
- , - �1����������������������! lu -� . ��� i. si
L',. '
�.
'�
f§': : .
��'
�' :.
E�1ST#NG �U1'URE LAND USE MA�. . `; - � _ � ,
;..._y ;_ . :, , . �.. �..
_ � . - . � �� � 7T �LAN N FILE -
- . PPROV D �Rf/PCD VNTH MASTER S E P O
- A E
. <!.c -� SE .
� T3 ��� MXD- ��`6U
;_ . .� :.: . , .,, . .. ,:- i ;.
_. .. � ,.� . .�.. , � ' �� �. ' '�. .. •.� � �'�. '� � R?.-Rt�6E �liA;'40Y� .. -C6INNIEBRiAL.r.... �RO� RF9M��� 416N t�EN-SPA_E.. NN7(� � �4R8AN-GROWTHBOUNDARY �;�� .
�r !�! .: , '' -: . �- c, �, r� �4 _ .,,� N
, ; . - . ,: . : �: ..
. _ . �.,.
�
:_ �� .. .. � ��-` . , :�'. . .�. - . , ..--� . ..�" . ',� � � R�IL,+� ��`QENiIA_�;:MEl3nllY1,.' PSS�P$.P���I�NA���,E�Z'P. ....:�:.4*`R Ci0-NnME$i�RL$� -�F.L1T16N3:� RR10�-RORklRE51DENTtALItPER10ACNESf` ' �-.:.� g q ��..- . . ..- �����:�. �. �.DENSITYREDUCTIONOVERLAY �
� �,--- , , . .. -' - '� , i�._ ,.- ;.� , __.,. ... ...� . _.�,,. �._ ., ,_.� 8�6SGIEt1tERE E RCH.PROTECTIONOV�RL9lY(BRPO). � L�
� � -� � �" - - - ' - � � � - � V E BOULFJARD CORFID�R PL tltJif AR[A
. ■j� R.' - . .- . ..�. ' �� l�H�K$�LbENYIl�LNiti!! �1 -�Nf3k13T8I}(�. '.:: '�£QNS COF��R�fAili#Y�:; �: _:�-�_RR20-RURALRESIDENTIALf1PER20ACRESi . � . � - . . .. WFSiERIJ�:ORTHLA: . . . . r. .., ��
_ �{/�{�� 1 e ��.�M{f;MOB1LEHf1NfE '�'3 P=PUBLFC ��fs liQLf ��i �: --RVL-RESIDENTIAI.VERYLOW . - .. PARRI^iAYSYSTEfe7 . �� /
■1il�1P A� ■ �� F��T�URE L/'lND �SE � �, .. . - . . � � MACARTHURBOULEVAROPROTEC710NOVERLAY � . C.
.. . : .:.. � .,y� /. .:- � � � :I��-. � Q � ' �. .. . � �' , .. � . ,. . • `:� . - . , . L - _. . . . .
� ' � \ �. :k . . MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY .
--� - .� �UNINCORPORATED PA M BBACH COUNTV � i,.� -'
�� �l�( � .�.f� �`�"',Yl�� ��B�I�C���.G�'��Ii ��V-�-� � � � � - , � NQRTHUSKEBOUL�IIARDOVERLAYZONE.(NBOZj -
� . � •.., . J . . .., . a: _- . . . . . . . , : � .: . ' .__ ' .• ' ,.� _ -� >�_ __'. . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _- _ _
•, ..: �.�-:..�... ' ' . ... .,.._ . . � .`.. ... .., . . . . . _..:;.' ,._, .:..: :, ". " _ - "
. .. :-�`. . . ..,. •.:;.r:. . . ... , .. . . . .._., :, .,.. . . . ;i;. . �.i�.�. '. : '�-� - � I'. PT .8. " ��.- .-REF&67"OE� EARCH �':
..:;�_.. . .;_. .. , . _ .,. . .. .., .. ` :,�-. . • ��',.-. . "t� � li�D:it$E XD7LAlPW�FJ9 -IGE86�T�PN1,lMfiE_ . 4..I,Y�1,4�1N..Q.U}�..... .969 ..
- . .... .....,. , . .� . . ._:__. _ , - .,._:__ . _.. -
.... , ., . . ,. .. �, ,., �_, . �. . . . . _ - . . . , : .. �-.: . ,.:
<: , .. , ..:.. ,, .- . .: _ _. kr . . , 1b7 .... .. . .. .. . .
; _ _ , _ _. _. _. .._ .,. � �t �p
, _ < �.. h _ _
. ,,... , -: ; .. , ., .; , ., .,
_ . . . _. ; , , � ,.,._.,. . ..
.
.,
ce, `t ri Y.�
_ _� �_ �... . �,. , . .. �:.. , .. . „.. _ - - -
, >_ . , .-� , �,;. 1� M . . �3r�A�.. �
.. ... . ._...-.... ... ... ..... -._ . ... . �. . 7..:., .., .... _ ......�:.,:. . _.. .. ::�.�. .� �. - -
. .' . . �.. ... ,� . . ....... ...-,... y _.. , .. e.... .. ... .. .-... 2: _. :..:..,.. ..R� . - ��#�
�y� ;
,J .
, .- .r. ... ... �. .. .. . ...- ..�.: ...
.. .. ��,_. . . � ... �. , . .., . . Fi �P- .... . . .s_ _� , - _.. � � _. k. �.. . . ,� . , .:. , . y :
..: � ,� -..,: :. , r. .;..,. ,. . � ,.. ��� .. . �.��.�. .rf. ,.. .-,.. � .� �;� �.�.,_.,.,n ��_ r. _ �.:.. � �. ....,.,, .,:..F.:-r.. .�, _'s.. .N - .#�- :r
. , ,. , z . , , � . <<., . , � � � � � ,t .. . r . �� � 3 . � r
.. : . , . .. ..._ �. � , t . ._ y_ � . �� . , , . . � __ � . � �
�. , ., _ , , . ._ <;, , , , .. . . . r. . ,, w . .,� . ... ". .. , n �i. . :� $��`e�! '�,
... . . � .. :.s � ,.'V . ... ..... - �.. _ �. '�. �: . , . . y s. . �, . .. _ ' _ .., . ,� � 3 i. . :� y� - ..y' . ..... � . . ... . �s' ': -��.. ��� Q�'i'!� . K^
. ,.. ... .�.o ...u. ..i._. . ... . . . _, .. f ..�r?+ Li .:, . . . ..- _� .-._ i. a.� . _.. �._,�. ,_..,r..., , .. .. -<....
V �. ..' . .. .. -.. . . - _ ... ',�o.. a.._.s _.:.. . . � , M�.- ._._. a_�w-._a_. .i..viC' _..,.F .. , t _ . .'C"'F . . 4 ...<' _ , . t. ..: ' ��# n�.,. kEi�s��tt% „ . �'1 . . l . ���;_
atm. Beach C�unt �or d� �_ :... . .��.. �� ,��
,Qf� ,... . : . . ._� i �.. .., �.. _,.r;.� .s, �...wi ..y.X. �_'/:��,a:?- T -.- � '-,._ _ -�. _��..� L .�. �H'�:�
�,.. . .. ..� :�:, . 7.. . . .:-� rr'•,.-. :;.._i -w. ,ZC ��-�. ";., t �s•�.,-�,:' r c',.��,' �-.r.�, .�,?.... ..-tb Fs - �, :��. } e-- -; -fi���
. �-.�'. .-.. .:. . . . >�-:i ?. .�.. ..:_ ____ .. .-, ir ' �. ,. � _ - ) ...k
. .' �.� -::�-' �:-� -�- , . r . -..,: .. . :. _.. ....._..._ _. �r� _ .� . �,. .:. �:*� __�`-i` r.= . r. 'x
... . . . :... ... ��-.�.-,.z.. _2. _._ ,...__ , .. .._,. . .,. . ,�,.- ._.. � _ _ .i�;
: ft5�.. -.� .....,. �[+. y -
.-,- .. .. . . .._ . , .. . , ,. .... w � .. . _. 3-. ._._ , w. ... . _ �-�.;. I� ,.c
,.._. . _ �... . ... . __. . . �:_ .... :.r.. .. . -� - .. .. .:-:.. ... . _. < .. .�., _ . _,.� ..._ , �:. _ > .. ��._ 1 _ ......, .. f r�
. .. .: .. :n..,._. .. .t_ ,..V d-... .ea-. �.�_.. .. ..,..� _..,, -e.. ..>. s f.. ,.' _, ...-. .. ._.. .h . ... .a .. �...}w .n.... .},
... . . . .. ..�. .,., . . ::-. .... . ,....._ ....� � ... � .,. ...�,..._..� s ( ...... .�� �.�.._i... __r__.. .�.s. Y ,•. ... .:4 . �..n�i. .�_ . 9.".�' � t+F l. �.: Y', t!_. ..Y._ .i.Y. _ .�2:'�
t . . . . . . . ''.: e-.....A . . .. ... . ky .�+._.. .... _. . , . .:S . _ . ..... 'R ...... .. . . <! . ,..e.. .. . e...._r� �.`_ �.. a.-. _ . r i... v,_7.�� el... -
...� . . . .. ., .. -.�. . .� .. :�. ,.,. -�.....,..� ._.-... .,nY . ..... .. ..: .... ..F.,..._ . ..,..._... . .. .. _ "
.. . .._,., ,. ..�......�. ��.� � . . . . . _ ` . � . . .. . . . . . � . � . - OU ,
,.. . . ... . �. . , . ��� � , _ . _
.. �-,. . .. +. «,.r . , .
-.� : . .. ,.: . : � _ ... ._�s..
r,...., . ,.
,.... �.:..._ . - . . - .. � . :�: ,...�. . ..�. . .. � � , ..r-:._� ' _ . .
. ., ..�_.a ..�._W ._�..�; .... r,:-..c. �- '..,...g fC8`'�{�i�-ii{���1��J�i�
�. T BR�GER�,TRA
�`,' 2 LOS_ARBQR:
�; 3 BRLES; MXD
. . . � � . � � R�?%
� kM,=:
�Af!.:
, � r�..
MAP A.1. FUTURE LAND USE
a r. -�" . . . .
: ' of.Palm Beach Gardens
� ` �m E�each County, Florida :
IAXIMUM QF 5;361 AM %aND_5;
a A:'MAXtMUM OF 12A4.28 pM
�AF.47.13�kM AND 19:99 PM�.�
OF,B6.2b-AM ANO 38.54�PM N
N�IY�PEAKNOUR��TRIPS ''
P.M NET NEWB�AK�HOUR TRIRS �
AK HdUR TRIPS � � -
AK�HOUR TR{RS �� �
PEAK�HOUR TRIPS
'�NEY�(:P.�AKH�[1RTRIF�$ --
� ,�
�
�.T ,
� �. �:�
'�•g�,
�4�`� +a�
`� z t,► ,
;1
'e .
���.
��..;�
ES�IiEN7iA1;LQV1[ �`.�.��,� ¢ES��RC�A(. r ���.0§ REG'NR.Jq'ILQ[ifyP�N�PACE� �� -MXD-FAIXEDUSE � UF8ADIGROWTHBOUNOARV APPROVEDDRI:PCOWITHPIIASTERSITE�PLkIIONFILE /\I
(�'�IDBtiTUAkIN�ES�U.fyE:�-Pq PRQK£l&Bi0lfAL�±'FFI�S:E,�]CR CQMpIER�CeAkRi�REA`UON- -RR10-RURALRESIDEWTIAL{1PER10ACRES) � DENSiTYREDUC710PlOVERLAY � � �
i BIOSCIENCE RESEARCH PROTECTIOM OVERIAY IBRPOI � �
L$)DGN7'flkGBl�y ;,�I 1f{p{!Sj$IAC _ !�qQ�78�C0►i$@RYAT(fNl ,.wRR20-RURAlRE51DENTIAL(1PER20ACRES) . � � WESTERNNORTHLAKEeOULEVAROCORRIDORPLANNIMGAREA %}�
1081�EHQME �P�•PTIBL�IC• �'�G OOIf �� �-RVL•RESIOENTIALVERYLOW . � � � � � - � PARKWAYSYSTEfr1 . �
-� - � - - � - � � . - �� MACARTHUR 80UlEVARO PROTECTION OVERLAY � `�
.. . . , . . . . . . . . . .. . � . . � ��lUWICiPAL EOUiJDAFY \Y
UNWCORPORATED PALPA BEACH COUNTY �
.: � � � � - - � � - " � � � � - � _ � � NORiHLAKE80ULEVARDOVERtAYZONF��N602) � . . . . . � . . . .
0 2;500 '5,000 10,OQ0 15,OOQ 20,000 c�e�ea Fe��,a�yzs, zoos
���� Feet
. � � , . , . . � � � � Source� P9GGrourtn 67gmi
Cit of Palm Beach Gardens
Y
CPTA-09-02-000016
Local Planning Agency
March 24, 2009
Re ue st
q
• City-initiated request to amend the notation on the City's Future Land Use
Map pertaining to the permitted land use densities and intensities
established by Ordinance 7, 2005 for approximately 708.14 acres located
south of Donald Ross Road, north of Hood Road, and east and west of
I nterstate 95.
• A request by Urban Design Kilday Studios, agent for The Lester Family
Investments, L.P. et al. and Palm Beach County, for a text amendment to
the City's Comprehensive Plan to provide a new subcategory to the
existing Mixed Use Land Use designation for BioScience Mixed Use
Developments
City Initiated Map Amendment
Donald Ross Road
Fl
o
r
i
d
a
T
u
r
n
p
i
k
e
Eastpointe
Abacoa
Mirasol
Ce
n
t
r
a
l
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Hood Road
SITE
Westwood Gardens/ Lakes
San Michelle
Benjamin HS
Legends @ the Gardens
Old Palm
Approx. 1 mile
Approx. 1 mile
Ap
p
r
o
x
.
1
¼
m
i
l
e
Background
•June 16, 2005, the City Council approved Ordinance 7, 2005, a City-
initiated request for an amendment to the FLUM -modified the land use
from RL /C to MXD 708 acres.
•Densities and intensities were limited to : 8 million sq ft of Research and
Development; 1,000 multi-family workforce units; and 50,000 square feet of
commercial or the equivalent thereof .
•January 16, 2009, ADA for DRI for Scripps Florida Phase II/Briger Tract for
1.6 million square feet of biotech R&D for 2.4 million square feet of related
biotechnological/biomedical, pharmaceutical and ancillary uses, 500,000
square feet of commercial/retail, and 2,700 residential units.
Background
•Proposed Briger DRI includes only a portion of the area that was included
with Ordinance 7, 2005.
•5 additional notations will be added to the FLUM to provide specific intensity
and density CAP for 5 parcels that are currently subject to Ordinance 7,
2005, but not part of the DRI.
•The cap for these outparcels will be reflected on the FLUM as “MXD
authorized uses producing a maximum of ____AM and ____PM Net New
Peak Hour Trips”.
Ordinance/Project Status Vehicle Trips
Morning Afternoon
Ordinance 7, 2005 (CAP)Adopted 7,615 6,483
Proposed Briger DRI In Process 5,361 5,528
Remaining Trips 2,254 955
Scripps/Briger Equivalency
Parcel Distribution
Parcel Acres Proportionate
Acreage
Proportionate Share
of Remaining Vehicle
Trips
Morning
(2,254)
Afternoon
(955)
Powerplay Sports 13.96 55.07%1,241.26 525.91
Robert Bales 0.53 2.09%47.13 19.97
Danny Baily 0.97 3.83%86.25 36.54
Robert Frances 0.47 1.85%41.79 17.71
Batt School 9.42 37.16%837.58 354.88
Total 25.35 100%2,254 955
Text Amendment
Background
•Proposed amendment would modify the existing MXD designation to create
a new category to allow for bioscience uses.
•Currently, the MXD designation includes 2 existing subcategories:
Residential MXD’s and Non-Residential MXD’s.
•New subcategory would be geared toward bioscience users that would be
reviewed and regulated under appropriate standards that are not otherwise
existing in the City’s Comprehensive Plan today.
•Proposed standards are necessary for the successful recruitment of
bioscience companies seeking to locate within the City of Palm Beach
Gardens.
•The proposed standards also provide for the ability for clustered design and
critical mass to be able to support public transit in the future.
Land Allocations:
Land Use Component Land (Acres) Allocation Lot Coverage Height
Open Space Min. 20%
Commercial Min. 2%Max. 30%Max. 70%Max. 4 FL
Residential High Min. 5%Max. 40%Max. 50%Max. 4 FL
Residential Low Min. 2%Max. 40%Max. 50%Max. 3 FL
Employment Center Min. 20%Max. 60%Max. 70%Max. 4 FL**
Height Criteria
•
**The height limit for Employment Center Buildings (as defined below)located
within the BioScience MXD shall be a maximum of 150 feet if the Employment
Center Buildings meet all of the following criteria:
1.Located within the designated BRPO
2.Include of a minimum of 100 contiguous acres within the designated BRPO;
3.Located within a Development of Regional Impact;
4.Located east and immediately adjacent to Interstate 95;
Special Definitions:
Employment Center Buildings shall be defined as those buildings used for
bioscience technology research and development,laboratories,corporate offices,
medical offices,research and educational facilities,light industry,hospitals,and
conference hotels.
Parcels within the BRPO
#Name Acres
1 Briger Tract 170.0
2 Legends of the Gardens 21.6
3 Parcel 31.06/31.07 41.8
4 Parcel 31.04 50.6
5 The Pointe 9.2
6 PGA Corporate Center (5A)84.21
7 PGA Design Center (5B)26.1
8 NorthCorp 102.7
9 Gardens Station 7.6
10 Riverside/Burns 49.5
11 PGA National Commerce Park 8.5
Tract 100 acres within
BRPO
Located within
DRI
Located
immediately east
and adjacent to
I-95
Briger Tract
Legends of the
Gardens
X X X
Parcel 31.06/31.07 X X
Parcel 31.04 X X
The Pointe X X
PGA Corporate
Center (5A)
X X
PGA Design Center
(5B)
X X X
NorthCorp X
Gardens Station X X
Riverside/Burns X X X
PGA National
Commerce Park
X X X
Height
•Provides the ability to cluster
•A necessary tool to successfully recruit biotech
(higher floor-to-floor requirements)
•Ability to preserve open space and environmentally
sensitive areas
•Provide critical mass to support pedestrian friendly
environment
•Provides density to feasibly support mass transit
•150’ CAP will provide certainty –good for potential
users and good for residents
Current Comp Plan Policy:
•Mixed Use Development (MXD)….The City Council
may waive the maximum nonresidential height limit
for employment center buildings located at the
intersection of two arterials….
Beckhem Building, La Jolla California
Scripps Building A –Jupiter. Lab Space
Donald Ross Road
Fl
o
r
i
d
a
T
u
r
n
p
i
k
e
Abacoa
Mirasol
Ce
n
t
r
a
l
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Hood Road
SITE
Old Palm
Approx. 1 mile
Approx. 1 mile
Ap
p
r
o
x
.
1
¼
m
i
l
e
PGA Boulevard
Mi
l
i
t
a
r
y
T
r
a
i
l
Consistency with Comprehensive Plan
GOAL 1.3.: CONTINUE TO PLAN FOR FUTURE NEEDS TO PROMOTE LIVIBLE
COMMUNITIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
FOR BIOSCIENCE USERS, TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT, AND OTHER
EFFORTS TO PROMOTE SUSTAINABLE GROWTH.
*****
Objective 1.3.4.: Maintain a Bioscience Research Protection Overlay (BRPO) for the
purpose of promoting Bioscience Uses and deterring the conversion of those uses
to commercial or residential uses.
*****
Objective 6.1.8.: Maintain land development regulations which, in conjunction
with the efforts of other regulatory agencies having jurisdiction, ensure the
protection and preservation of native habitats, and maximize the provision of open
space for this purpose.
Staff recommends approval of the proposed land-use amendment petition
CPTA-09-02-000016 based on the following findings of fact:
•The proposed amendment is consistent with the existing Goals, Objectives,
and Policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan;
•The proposed amendment is consistent with the existing Goals, Objectives
and Policies of the Treasure Coast Regional Council Strategic Policy Plan;
and
•The proposed amendment is consistent with the existing Goals, Objectives
and Policies of the State Comprehensive Plan.
Recommendation
Please Print COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: 4 -, r rc, .,!Ai.& j+?./ ! ,,, ,I I Address: Subject: Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: Subject: Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print ~ ~~ Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print ) Name: \~Sd*\ 3 p. Lsob Address: 4270-6 *4&X Ci: -?.%. 6. Subject: (2<toY idJC; B-LLS Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the Ci Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
I r‘i; 0 coqoL+k ~CP+~~~ k@+bL \.le FQ COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print ’PQ-$p - Name: Address: 1!1,d f. Kdd ’/kc- city: P. 4, r - ~v&Gd & d&4 &Ve,7J,, ?2-4a L LAW 1 a?& A&@ i/ / Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.