HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes RAB 092302PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING
MINUTES
September 23, 2002
The City of Palm Beach Gardens Parks and Recreation Advisory Board met on
September 23, 2009- The meeting was called to order at 7:04 P.M.
II. ROLL CALL
Members Present: Jim Maynor, the chair indicated that a letter of resignation from Jim
Maynor will be forthcoming; Tory Buckley, excused; Mary Ann Hedrick, Phil Milton,
excused; Bert Premuroso, Wendy Walker, Dace Lill, Michael Axelrod, excused; and
George Schmidt.
III. INTRODUCTION
Sheryl Stewart, Assistant to the City Manager, introduced Linda Monroe, who is the
Chair of the Blue Ribbon Panel; the Blue Ribbon Panel was established this summer,
through Resolution by council. A committee of residents throughout the city to address
funds for storm water drainage, canal reservoir and a on going maintenance.
a. COMMITTEE STATUS REPORT
Asking residents, to approve a plan, for a ten (10) year period, to pay a fix amount
approximately $60.00 a year.
There are two (2) status: (1) Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU). (2) a
Municipal Service Benefit Unit (MSBU). The MSBU would be a service that will
continue indefinite.
b. JOINT BOND ISSUE PLAN
There will be a meeting on the 19`x', to get input from departments and the public
To help get feed back on the bond issue, before any action is taken.
Motion and seconded that on October 21s` Agenda, with the board's permission,
bring the back -up data that we have been reviewing with the two top consultant
which would be the City Engineer, City Finance and the Chairlady an have a
presentation.
IV. PARK ENCHANCEMENT PROJECT
a. PARCEL PURCHASE
A parcel of land that is under review for development on the eastern side of Mac
Arthur Blvd., where it intersect Northlake Blvd
A proposal would be a restaurant, shops and retail offices; another proposal is a round
a -bout around the Banyan Tree.
A referendum brought by the residents of the city, indicates that the area should be a
park instead of a commercial site, because of traffic congestion on Northlake and Mac
Arthur.
b. PUBLIC FORUM
Motion and seconded that we have a Public Forum Workshop on Saturday, October
19, 2002.
Richard Jackson of "Glatting Jackson ", did an overview of what the Workshop should
focus on.
• A session of various time for people invited to get specific information regarding the
parks (11)
• Propose a Development Plan
• Set -up a Priority List
• It was suggested, A Theme is needed; someone suggested "Our City Our Park"
V. DISTRICT PARK FEASIBILITY STUDY
• Have a Project Background
• Have a Project Objective
• Bottom line, have ideas and what the cost.
• Give as many options as possible.
VI. PARKS DIVISION UPDATE
Field Renovation
Approved a Landscape Contract
Re- Organization for Emergency Management Plan
Skate Park
High School Baseball Field
Sandhill Crane Boat Excess
VII. RECREATION DIVISION UPDATE
Light Poles/ One — Of- A- Kind, Students Banner Exhibition painted from students
of the School of Arts.
2002 -2003 Brochures, Gardens Art Exhibit
Artist Reception on October 24`x', for Tim Prentice, connate sculpture, small
rendition, inside the City's Lobby, it actually moved with sound, the largest
piece of Art that the city owned.
On October 30'', a recognition dinner for volunteers will be held.
Set -up guidelines on policies and fees on the Skate Park
Renovate the Annex Facility/ used for seniors during the day and a wellness at night
Ground Breaking / Marasol , also housed the Honda Classic.
VIII. COMMENTS BY THE PUBLIC
It was suggested that we look for some means of recognizing the William's
Sisters
IX. COMMENTS BY BOARD MEMBER
No comments
X ADJOURN
The meeting was adjourned at 8:44 P.M.
•
L�
CONSULTANT SERVICES AUTHORIZATION
City of Palm Beach Gardens
Park Planning and Design Continuing Services
DATE: September 11, 2002
Revised September 16, 2002
Revised September 20, 2002
SERVICE AUTHORIZATION: 2
CITY PROJECT NO.: 2002 -022
GJ PROJECT NO: 17055
PROJECT TITLE: DISTRICT PARK DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
INTRODUCTION
The City of Palm Beach Gardens (the "City") entered into an agreement entitled Agreement for
Professional Services (the "Agreement ") with Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart,
Inc., ( "Consultant ") on the 4`t' day of September, 2002. This Consultant Services Authorization
( "CSA "), when executed, shall be incorporated in and become an integral part of the Agreement.
All services provided shall be performed under the terms and conditions described in the
Agreement.
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1.1 The project is to analyze and verify the development program for the development of the
District Park site, as well as associated costs and projected revenue.
1.2 Additional Professionals working on the project as subconsultants to Glatting Jackson
include:
Architecture: Thaddeus Cohen Architects, P.A.
Civil Engineering: Williams Hatfield & Stoner, Inc
2.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES
PART I — Site Program and Feasibility Study
2.1 Project Management — In addition to the specific services detailed below, Glatting
Jackson shall coordinate our work with the Client's representative and the Client's
• project team, monitor the project schedule as it relates to this scope, and provide timely
invoicing and reporting of project progress.
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
Pagel of 4
C
2.2 Coordination of the Work of Subconsultants to Glatting Jackson — The Client
hereby acknowledges and agrees that Glatting Jackson will assume responsibility for the
coordination of work produced by any subconsultants to Glatting Jackson as Project
Manager for the project. However, the Client agrees that Glatting Jackson does not bear
any liability for the technical accuracy of work prepared by others. All professional
firms working on the project shall bear separate responsibility and liability for the work
prepared by them.
2.3 Existing Data — The Client will provide Glatting Jackson with the following data for the
site:
• Aerial photograph
• Boundary, topography, site and tree surveys
• Architectural and civil plans completed under previous studies of the District Park
site
Site plan of the existing Tennis Center
• FRDAP grant application prepared for the expansion of the Tennis Center
• Space requirements/ development program for the Municipal Annex
Glatting Jackson will consider all information supplied by the Client as accurate and
• correct. Additional work required due to inaccurate, incorrect, or incomplete
information supplied by the Client shall be completed as an Additional Service.
2.4 Kick -off Meeting— Glatting Jackson and the Client will attend one (1) meeting to
review the existing data, discuss project objectives, review the proposed development
program requirements for the Municipal Annex and generally kick off the project.
2.5 Development Program Memorandum— Glatting Jackson shall review the existing
interlocal agreement with Palm Beach County regarding the development of the District
Park site, the results of the completed needs survey and previous development plans for
the site and prepare a memorandum summarizing a development program for the site. In
addition, Glatting Jackson shall propose a definition for the Park's service area based on
population figures for the City of Palm Beach Gardens. Glatting Jackson shall submit
this memorandum to the Client one (1) time for review. Glatting Jackson shall revise the
memorandum one(1) time.
2.6 Draft Feasibility Study for the Development of the District Park — Based on the
approved development program memorandum, Glatting Jackson shall analyze the
development program for the following:
• Order of magnitude development costs
• Order of magnitude maintenance costs
• Potential for development assistance (grants, partnerships, etc)
• Potential for revenue generators and expected income stream
• • Potential for project phasing
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
Page 2 of 4
•
Glatting Jackson shall submit the Draft Feasibility Study to the Client one (1) time for
review. Glatting Jackson shall revise the Draft one (1) time.
2.7 Presentations - Glatting Jackson shall present the Development Program and Feasibility
Study, and an accompanying PowerPoint slide presentation, at one (1) Recreation
Advisory Board meeting and one (1) City Council meeting. If necessary, Glatting
Jackson shall revise the Development Program and Feasibility Study one (1) time based
on the Client's written review comments.
Deliverables — As a result of these tasks, Glatting Jackson shall produce the following:
• One (1) digital copy and one (1) hard copy of the Draft Development Program
Memorandum
• One (1) digital copy and one (1) hard copy of the Draft Feasibility Study
Memorandum
• Up to two (2) revisions of the Development Program Memo and Feasibility
Study Memo
• Memoranda summarizing comments received at the Public Workshop
• One (1) digital copy and one (1) color copy of a PowerPoint Presentation
is 3.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE
Glatting Jackson is prepared to begin work on the project immediately upon receipt of
this executed Letter of Agreement and a retainer if required under Compensation.
Glatting Jackson, in consultation with the Client, shall perform its work in such a manner
as to comply with an agreed upon schedule.
•
4.0 ASSIGNED PERSONNEL
The following personnel from Glatting Jackson will be assigned to this project, and will
have the responsibilities described:
David Barth - Principal- In- Charge/Principal 3
Richard Durr - Project Manager/Landscape Architect 4
Mike Sobczak - Landscape Architect 4
Chad Atkins - Landscape Designer 1
Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart, Inc.
Page 3 of 4
J
The City of Palm Reach Gardend
Preienti
The fllemander W. Dreyfooi School of the IOU
5(d (lnnual "One -of -a Kind"
Student Banner Exhibition
Friday. September R7`"
G:OOpm - S:OOpm �
PerFormencei by the
Dance & Mu rie Departmentf
Award Ceremony for *ReA* Ranneu
RefreArnentl
City Flail lobby & Plaza
10500 n. Military Trail. Palm Reach Gardena. Ft
Rannerr are juried by The City hell nrt Toilc force & nrt Proseriionol-i From
The Dreyfoor School of the nrti & The middle School of the nrtr
Palm Beach Gardens
Parks Programming Workshops
Draft Workshop Agenda
October 19, 2002
9:00 am Coffee / Refreshments
9:30 am Introductions / Project Background / Project Objectives /
Summary of Previous Findings
10:00 am Session One Breakout Planning Groups:
1. Oaks Park
2. Municipal Pool
3. Lake Catherine Sports Complex, including Lakeside Park and
McArthur Blvd.
4. Riverside Community Center
11:30 am Lunch
12:15 pm Session Two Breakout Planning Groups:
• 1. Burns Road Community Center
2. Municipal Plaza, Amphitheater and Park
3. District Tennis Center
4. Gardens Park
1:30 pm Break
1:45 pm Session Three Breakout Planning Groups:
1. Plant Drive Park, Teen Center and Dog Park
2. PGA Park
3. Sandhill Crane Access Park and Trail
3:15 pm Next Steps and Wrap up
Throughout the Day — Public is welcome to review exhibits and leave behind comment
cards
IqGEti1DH ITEm
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
MEMORANDUM
3. ,4
TO: Mayor and Council DATE: September 4, 2002
THROUGH: Ron Ferris, City Manag�
FROM: Sheryl Stewart, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: Report regarding MacArthur Boulevard
To coincide with the City Council meeting Agenda item on the proposed conceptual plan
for traffic calming/roadway improvements along MacArthur Boulevard, this is to provide
you with the attached three documents:
Attachment 1: overview regarding the neighborhood meeting held on August 27, 2002
regarding the proposed conceptual plan.
Attachment 2: Mr. Michael Martino's letter dated August 15, 2002.
• Attachment 3: Staff s preliminary analysis of the issues that would need to be
considered and addressed regarding the impact of the requests outlined in Mr. Martino's
letter. Staff identified some of the benefits of developing the northeast comer of
Northlake Boulevard and MacArthur Boulevard, as well as the benefits of City
ownership.
Should you have any questions, please advise.
Attachments
•
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Council
ATTACHMENT
DATE: August 30, 2002
THROUGH: Ron Ferris, City Manager 6;�
FROM: Sheryl Stewart, Assistant to the City Manager
SUBJECT: Neighborhood Meeting — Proposed Conceptual Plan for MacArthur Blvd.
On Tuesday evening, August 27, 2002, staff attended a neighborhood meeting held at 340
Riverside Drive. The main purpose of the meeting, facilitated and coordinated by Carol
Estrada, was to discuss the proposed conceptual plan for roadway improvements and
traffic calming along MacArthur Boulevard. The residents at the meeting expressed the
following points regarding the proposed plan that is being presented to City Council on
September 4h:
• Do away with the stamped concrete around the Banyan tree.
• They object to any on -street parking.
• Do not have ingress and egress onto MacArthur Boulevard from the Banyan PUD
developments.
• Concerned about truck traffic caused by the PUD.
• One resident asked for speed bumps, another resident asked for raised brick
pavers rather than stamped concrete.
The main focus of discussion, as a solution to the traffic concerns, was that the City
should purchase the two parcels of property located at the northeast corner of MacArthur
Boulevard and Northlake Boulevard, south of the Lake Catherine Sports Complex. The
goal would be to concentrate on creating a significant entry feature into Plat 1, as well as
to improve the parks and recreation facilities in this area.
The main desire of the residents is to maintain the neighborhood character of the area. In
addition, the suggestion was made that the City also needs to concentrate on entryway
features and beautification at Lighthouse Drive and Holly Drive, just west of Alternate
Al over the FEC railroad tracks.
Overall, there was consensus that the residents at the meeting did not hike the current
conceptual plan. They would like to see more done, as outlined in the attached letter.
• Attachment
Michael Martino
320 Balsam Strut
• Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
Phone: 622 -5862 or 845 -3158
8/15/02
Mayor /City Council
City of Palm Beach Gardens
10500 North Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
Dear Mayor /City Council,
ATTACHMENT: 2
I would like to take this opportunity to strongly suggest that the City Council begin immediate and
aggressive negotiations to purchase the property located at the northeast corner of Northlake Blvd. and
MacArthur Blvd., just south of the Lake Catherine Sports Complex. The benefits to the City and our
existing residents in perpetuating. our quality of life by purchase of this property far outweigh any cost
considerations or negative conversation that can be imagined.
Purchase of this property would put the entire eastern length of MacArthur Blvd. from Riverside Dr. to
Northlake Blvd, in the public domain. It would enhance opportunities to improve the Lake Catherine
Sports Complex, as well as, the possibly of joining with the School Board in an interlocal agreement to
create a recreational complex that would satisfy both governments' needs. It may even give more
credence to the recreational facilities bond referendum that was reported to being considered by the city.
Purchase of this property would significantly improve the traffic problems and concerns in our Plat #I
• neighborhood by reducing the commercial densities and intensities intended to be developed on this
property. Ingress and egress to this property is very confined and difficult while posing significant traffic
problems to Northlake Blvd., MacArthur Blvd., Lighthouse Dr., and the Plat #1 neighborhood in general.
It would provide an opportunity to create a significant entrance feature into one of the original and first
areas of the City to be developed, such as, .the waterfall, that long graced this property. The property could
also be home to a future mini -Fire Rescue/ Police facility and passive park. The discussion of benefits to
the City by purchase of this property go on and on.
Funding sources should be of little concern. With all the new development, impact fees for recreation
should be swelling the Recreation Land and Facilities Account. Funds from the recent sale of the Cultural
and Recreation lands in the Regional Center could be used Some of our tax money could be allotted to
this endeavor. There may be some grant money available. County Commissioner Marcus could be
convinced tb;tt her discretionary funds are viable for this purchase. With imagination, creativity, and the
will to succe44 purchase of this property for the residents of Palm Beach Gardens should be a "no
braW.
In conclusion, I would urge the City Council to give the highest priority to this suggestion. There is no
need for a committee, or delegation to staff for study. It requires the City Council to make a decision to
proceed As a longtime rodent and past Mayor and Councilman I would suggest a publicly advertised
workshop meeting followed by a regular meeting to make your decision.
Thank you for consideration of this important City matter.
S' cexe
1 Martino
•
•
ATTACHMENT 3
Banyan Tree PUD — Parcel 12.04 & 12.05
Other considerations:
➢ Estimated Recreation Impact Fee balance @ 9/30/02 is $1,900,000
➢ $745,000 has been allocated in FY 2003 and 2004 CIP budgets
➢ Possible grant sources — development: FRDAP ($200,000 matching grant); Recreational
Trails Program ($100,000 matching grant); Keep Palm Beach County Beautiful
(beautification dollars for use along Northlake Boulevard — requires 50/50 match)
➢ Possible grant sources — acquisition: Florida Communities Trust/Florida Forever Program
(municipalities must provide a minimum 25% cash match); Florida Greenways and Trails
• Acquisition Program (match may be required)
East (5.21 acres)
West (3.9 acres)
Total
Market Value of Land
$1,453,100
$1,089,733
$2,542,833
$278,000 per acre
Construction Value-
$2,375,000
$2,375,000
Office
Construction Value-
$2,295,000
$3,272,500
$5,567,500
Retail
Construction-
$291,984
$208,016
$500,000
horizontal
Total Value of Land-
$6,415,084
$4,570,249
$10,985,333
If Developed
Loss in Ad Valorem
($38,490)
($27,421)
($65,911)
revenue if taken off
tax rolls and not
developed
Annual Debt if Land
($116,248)
($87,179)
($203,427)
was purchased and
financed for 20 yrs.
Millage required to
.0291
.0218
.0509
fund debt service
Loss of permit fee
($35,264)
($24,736)
($60,000)
revenue
Loss of impact fee
($357,097)
($258,587)
($615,684
Development Costs
$182,350
$136,500
$318,850
(Passive Design) @
$35,000 /acre
Design & A &E fees:
$18,235
$13,650
$31,885
10% of construction
costs
Operating Costs:
- Salaries
$21,673
$16,224
$37,897
-Operating Supplies
$12,480
$9,360
$21,840
-Capital Equipment
$50,000
$50,000
$100,000
-Water Feature Costs
1 $100,000
$100,000
$200,000
Other considerations:
➢ Estimated Recreation Impact Fee balance @ 9/30/02 is $1,900,000
➢ $745,000 has been allocated in FY 2003 and 2004 CIP budgets
➢ Possible grant sources — development: FRDAP ($200,000 matching grant); Recreational
Trails Program ($100,000 matching grant); Keep Palm Beach County Beautiful
(beautification dollars for use along Northlake Boulevard — requires 50/50 match)
➢ Possible grant sources — acquisition: Florida Communities Trust/Florida Forever Program
(municipalities must provide a minimum 25% cash match); Florida Greenways and Trails
• Acquisition Program (match may be required)
�J
1.) Substantial revenue would be lost (both fees and tax
base) under city ownership.
2.) The attached traffic study indicates no additional
traffic trip generation imposed on the properties to the
north beyond the concurrency analysis.
3.) The proposed development would enhance the traffic
patterns at the intersection and beautify the immediate
areas around the namesake Banyan Tree at the
developers expense.
4.) The purchase price of this property is substantial and
may require a referendum.
5.) Drainage would be improved in the entire area at
developers cost by a condition of approval in the P.U.D.
6.) Any and all maintenance of the total properties would
be borne by the developer, this would include both on
and off -site features.
7.) The northerly extension of Congress Avenue is still
being debated by the County Commission and the
impact on this property is unknown.
9
Pj
1.) If developed the property may be used for cut - through
traffic by lightweight vehicles west bound on Northlake
Boulevard due to the ingress- egress on the south
properties.
2.) A passive park would retain line of sight and eliminate
vertical construction.
• 3.) The existing recreational complex could be enhanced
or enlarged.
4.) The City would have a parcel(s) that could be used to
make an entrance statement with signage and
landscaping.
5.) The City would have a "people place" to gather for
baseball/softball tournaments and other events on an
interim basis.
6.) A portion of the parcel could be used for spill over grass
parking -as needed.
0
I-]
02/08/2002 11:36 , 56162499db
rx•. u.rw.. � ..va va.. ....ru ,-.�
v�
d.
YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULT
1 t440 a8th St. North, west Pslm Beach, FlaMe 3U12
February 7, 2002
Mr. Stephen S. Mathison PA
5606 PGA Boulevard
Suite 211
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
Re: South Florida Blood Bank
Dear Mr. Mathison:
INC.
(561) e24.7262 • Faoimile (SO 1) 624.9578
This letter is in response to your concern regarding the traffic from!thc. above referenced project.
The only traffic expected to access the site through MacArthur Boulevard from the north are
those residents living north of the site, These residents currently utAize this road. They may
make a few extra trips when they access the site, or stop at the site bn the way out or back to
their homes. Otherwise the project has no significant impact on thelneighborhood to the north. If
you need any additional information, please call me.
I
Sincerely,
ONNS ZIEL C C SULTANTS, MC.
vo a Ztel, P.E.
President
!
i
Traffic Enginoaring and Planning
I
CITYOF PAL!;! PZ:hC� Gd4�cti�
PLANNING & ZdvING DEPT.
!
1
J
..sari -G4 -02 11:12A
•
n
f�J
•
ROUGH DRAFT CONDITION LANGUAGE
Applicant will monitor tunung movements at the ingress and egress point and median opening
at Phase Two twice a year (peak season and off season) for a period of two years after completion
of the Blood Bank and Phase 2 to assure there are no substantial detrimental impacts to traffic in Plat
1. The monitoring reports will be delivered to the city engineer and Ms. Carol Estrada as
representative of plat 1.
If the monitoring reports indicate such substantial detrimental impacts, Applicant will under
take such efforts, applications and approvals to modify the ingress and egress point (i.e., to a right
turn out only from Phase 2 to Northlake Boulevard) are a means of mitigating same. Any such
revision to the ingress and egress point at Phase 2 shall require the Applicant to provide a revised
TIA to the city engineer for review and approval as to traffic impacts.
P.02
FtECEIVEU lb /UG J: Jyrw,
•
•
*07/1.6/2002 15:20 5614341663
PINDER TROUTMAN
FINDER TROUTMAN CONSULTING, INC.
PAGE 02
Transportation Planners and Engineers 2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1H
West Palm Beach, Fl 33406
(561) 434 -1644 Fax 434 -1663
www.pindertroutman.com
July 16, 2002
Mr. Talal Benothman
City of Palm Beach Gardens
Planning & Zoning
10500 North Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, Fl 33410
Re: Banyan Tree PUD - #PTCO2 -29
Dear Mr. Benothman:
The purpose of this letter is to address condition 19 of Ordinance 41, 2001. This condition requires a traffic
analysis for Phases 2 and 3 of the Banyan Tree PUD.
The Banyan Tree PUD received traffic concurrency based on the traffic analyses prepared for Parcel 12.04
(Phase 3) and Parcel 12.05 (Phases 1 and 2). Both sites were approved with right -in /right -out movements on
Northlake Boulevard and driveway connections on McArthur Boulevard allowing a full complement of left and
right turn movements.
Parcel 12.04 was originally approved for 27,000 SF of Retail use and 25,000 SF of Office use. A traffic
equivalency analysis has been submitted for a proposed development including 24,700 SF of Retail use, a
5,000 SF Quality Restaurant and a 3,900 SF Drive -in Bank. This proposed development program will generate
less net new external daily and less AM peak hour trips than the approved development program. During the
PM peak hour, the number of net new external trips is estimated to be the same for both the approved and
proposed development programs.
Parcel 12.05 was originally approved for 29,000 SF of Retail use, 25,000 SF of Office use and a 3,500 SF
Drive -in Bank. A traffic equivalency analysis dated August 21, 2001 proposed 38,500 SF of Retail and 41,000
SF of Office use. This traffic equivalency analysis, which as been approved, also showed a decrease in net new
external daily trips as well as a decrease in net new external PM peak hour trips.
As currently proposed, the traffic from both Parcel 12.04 and Parcel 12.05 has been reduced. Thus the traffic
impacts on MacArthur Boulevard, from the neighborhoods north of the site, will be reduced.
If you require additional information please contact this office.
Very truly yo
hart . Pinder, AICP
Principal
KMP /Id r
cc: )im Helm
Sean Donahue
terrer Bend "n 02.29 7.16 -02
DTI
•
BANYAN TREE PUD
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
Introduction
Banyan Tree is an approved PUD located both east and west of MacArthur Boulevard and north of _.
Northlake Boulevard in the City of Palm Beach Gardens. The sites have traffic concurrency approval
for a combination of retail and office uses.
Ordinance 41, 2001 (February 21, 2001) of the City approved the rezoning of the sites to Planned
Unit Development and also approved a site plan for a 40,900 SF office building on Phase 1. Phases
1 and 2 are located on the west side of MacArthur Boulevard and Phase 3 is located on the east side
• of MacArthur Boulevard. The subject ordinance also restricted certain ingress and egress
movements.
Trip Generation
Trip generation for the approved uses on Phases 1 and 2 and the proposed uses on Phase 3 are
shown on Exhibits 1A, 1 B and 1 C for the Daily, AM peak hour and PM peak hour respectively. The
current development programs for the PUD are less intense than the traffic concurrency approval.
On a daily basis the trip generation is 23% less than the concurrency approval and during the PM
peak hour the trip reduction is 15 %.
Traffic Assignment
A trip distribution and assignment was developed based on proposed driveway configuration,
previous traffic study approvals and knowledge of traffic patterns in the area. The assignment of
traffic to project driveways and adjacent roadway links is provided on Exhibit 2.
• As a result of the revised driveway geometrics and a reduction in new external project traffic, the
impacts on all roadways is less than that of previous approvals.
Report 02 -29 7 -25 -02 1
•
•
Conclusion
Banyan Tree PUD traffic impacts on MacArthur Boulevard will be less than that shown and approved
in the concurrency traffic analysis.
Report 01 -29 7 -25 -02
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
• RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
AGENDA
September 23, 2002
7:00 PM
Council Chambers — City Hall.
1. Call To Order
2. Roll Call
3. Introduction by Sheryl Stewart, Assistant to the City Manager —
Linda Monroe, Blue Ribbon Panel Chairperson
a. Committee Status Report
b. Joint Bond Issue Plan for March 2003 — Request for
coordination of the two bond issues and campaigns
• 4. Park Enhancements Project
a. Consider — Parcel Purchase Along Mac Arthur Blvd.
b. Public Forum — Saturday, October 19, 2002
5. District Park Feasibility Study — Glatting Jackson Presentation
6. Parks Division Update
7. Recreation Division Update
8. Comments By The Public
9. Comments By Board Members
0 10.Adjourn