HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda PZAB 101006City of Palm Be?:h Gardens
Octo6er io, 2006
%an.didjti Mansen
Dennis Solbman
Craig Xunklk
icheCpanczaL
DuugGzs PenneK
Barry Present
Janathn D. Ru6ins
Joy 3fecfit (1'' Act..)
Amir xaneC(e Act..)
ARDENS "
10500 N. MILTARY TRAIL PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410-4698
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 10,2006
TO: Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board Members
FROM: Growth Management Department
SUBJECT: Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board Meeting
Tuesday, October 10,2006 - 6:30 P.M.
J
Enclosed is the agenda containing the items to be presented on Tuesday, October 10,
2006. This meeting will be held in the Council Chambers, Palm Beach Gardens
Municipal Building, 10500 North Military Trail, beginning at 6:30 p.m.
Enclosed with this memorandum are the following items:
1. An agenda for the meeting; and
2. A compact disc containing PowerPoint presentations with user instructions; and
3. A Growth Management Department staff report for the items to be heard.
As always, the respective Project Managers' telephone numbers and e-mail addresses
have been provided in case you have any questions or require additional information on
any petition. This will help us offer better-staff support in the review of these
applications.
.
Nina Sorenson, Administrative Specialist 11, will call to confirm your attendance.
Growth Management Administrator
8TY OF PALM ACHGARDENS
10500 N. MILTARY TRAIL PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410-4698
AGENDA
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10,2006, AT 6:30 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
0 CALLTOORDER
0 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
0 REPORT BY THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATOR: KARA IRWIN 4
0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 12,2006 & September 26,2006
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
Regular Members: Alternates:
Craig Kunkle (Chair)
Barry Present (Vice Chai;)
Randolph Hansen 1
Dennis Solomon
Michael Panczak
Douglas Pennell
Jonathan D. Rubins
Joy Hecht (1 st Alt.)
Amir Kanel (2nd Alt.)
1.
Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board
October 10,2006
Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council:
Ex Parte Communication (Quasi Judicial)
Petition CUMJ-06-01-000001- Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council: A request by Anne Booth'of
Urban Design Studio, agent for Temple Judea of Palm Beach County, Inc., for approval
of an amendment to an existing Major Conditional Use to allow a 4,359 square-foot
classroom building. The three-acre site is located on the north side of Hood Road 0.2
mile west of Alternate AIA.
Project Manager: Jackie Holloman, Planner jholloman~bnf1.com (7994237)
2. OLD BUSINESS
3. NEW BUSINESS
4. ADJOURNMENT
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Florida Statute 286.26, persons with disabilities needing special accommodations to
participate in this proceeding should contact thc City Clerk's Ofice, no later than five days prior to the proceeding, at telephone number (561)
799-4120 for assistance: if hearing impaired, telephone the Florida Relay Service Numbers (800) 955-8771 (TDD) or (800) 955-8770 (VOICE).
for assistance. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board, Local Planning Agency, or Land
Development Regulations Commission, with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, they will need a record of the
proceedings; and for such, they may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Exact legal description and/or survey for the cases may be obtained from thefiles in the Growth
Management Department.
Common/pz agenda 10- 10-06.doc
2
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
September 12, 2006
MINUTES
The Regular Meeting of the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board of the City of Palm Beach
Gardens, Florida, was called to order by Chair Craig Kunkle, at 6:30 P.M. in the Council
Chambers of the Municipal Complex, 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens,
Florida, and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
REPORT BY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR
Ms. Kara Irwin, Growth Management Administrator, reported that the September 6, 2006
meeting, City Council approved the reappointments of PZA members Craig Kunkle, Randy
Hansen, Barry Present, Dennis Solomon, and Joy Hecht. City Council also approved removal
of shared parking for'legacy Place; the amendment to development order changing platting
requirements for Oak Park Office; and PGA Overlay revisions on first reading.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion was made by Mr. Hansen and seconded by Mr. Rubins to approve the minutes of the
August 22, 2006 meeting as submitted. Motion carried by unanimous 7-0 vote.
ROLL CALL:
Debbie Andrea, Recording Coordinator for the meeting, called the roll for the Planning,
Zoning and Appeals Board:
Present
Chair Craig Kunkle
Vice Chair Barry Present
Dennis Solomon
Randolph Hansen
Michael Panczak
Jonathan D. Rubins
Joy Hecht (1 sr Alt.)
Amir Kanel (2nd Alt.)
Absent
Douglas Pennell
Public Hearina and Recommendation to Citv Council:
LDRA-06-06-000007: Amendment to Subdivision I. AIPP, Sec 78-261: Sec 78-262
Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council: A City-initiated request for
approval of a text amendment to Section 78-261 and Section 78-262, of Subdivision I. Art
in Public Places, Code of Ordinances. This City Code amendment seeks to revise the art in
public places program deBnitions, procedures, and requirements.
Chair Kunkle announced this item had been pulled from the agenda.
Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes
September 12, 2006
Page 2
Public Hearinn and Recommendation to City Council:
CPTA-06-08-000006: Future Land Use Text Amendment for Bioscience Mixed- Use
Public Hearing & Recommendation to City Council: A City-initiated request for an
amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan to create a
Bio-science Mixed-use land-use designation and criteria relative to workforce housing.
Growth Management Director Kara Irwin presented the staff report.
Changes suggested by the board were to show annual median income in the amendment,
considering higher building height in MXD, to change the term at least 51% gross square
footage to read more than 50%; add landscaping, architecture, and other considerations to
the end of the last line in the first paragraph on page 9; in paragraph 3(b) second sentence on
page 9 change the word minimize to enhance; in paragraph 3(d) on page 9 to change same
exterior to something that meant nice and varied. An opinion was expressed that limiting
height to four stories would be a step backwards, particularly along the 1-95 corridor; that
consideration should be given to cost incentives by governmental entities; that commitment
should be made that some rental buildings remain rental; that plans for transportation
corridors should be considered sooner rather than later; and to be careful not to require so
many amenities in the workforce housing that living there would be unaffordable. Ms. Irwin
clarified that all five Interlocal partners had agreed to provide workforce housing but each
was tailoring the process to their own community. Ms. Irwin explained that the 20% would
be more defined in the LDR's, that the waivers required justification and approval, and that
environmentally friendly green building techniques had not yet been considered.
Chair Kunkle declared the public hearing open. Eileen Tucker, Shady Lakes, advised there
was a petition regarding height and density that would be presented to the City; she was
against too many waivers, and stated the overall concept should be understood. Jody Barnett
stated she was speaking as a private citizen and expressed her opinion this was premature and
studies should be done before setting the path for workforce housing. Carolyn Chaplik,
Hudson Bay Drive, noted people commute 1-112 to 2 hours from a job; asked the difference
between residential low and residential high; noted requiring 20% workforce housing would
increase height restrictions; and suggested getting back to the forbearance agreement, and
addressing workforce housing separately from biotech overlay.
Hearing no hrther comments from the public, Chair Kunkle declared the public hearing
closed. Ms. Irwin answered questions from the board, explaining the uses that were protected
by the bioscience overlay, and that the bioscience MXD was designed as an incentive to
encourage developments with a predominance of bioscience uses. Ms. Hecht wanted City
Council to know the percentage for workforce housing had been carefully developed. It was
suggested that this matter be workshopped with staff and City Council, particularly in regard
to changing height limitations; that certain things such as keeping rentals as rentals could not
be controlled by the city, and that green construction be considered in the future. It was noted
this section already existed within the comprehensive plan and only a subsection was
proposed to be added.
Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes
September 12,2006
Page 3
MOTION:
Mr. Present made a motion not to move petition CPTA-06-08-000006 forward. Mr.
Rubins seconded the motion. During a roll call vote, all members voted aye except Mr.
Solomon who voted nay. Therefore, the motion carried by 6-1 vote.
Mr. Solomon asked if this could still be considered by City Council. The City Attorney
clarified that if the intent of the board was to proceed to City Council, the motion should
have been to recommend to City Council that they not move forward, but the motion had
been that this board not move forward. The City Attorney advised if this board did not move
it forward it could not go to the Council, therefore, it would be next year before the City
Council could act upon it. Mr. Present, the maker of the motion, clarified that his
understanding was this board was only a recommending board so therefore by recommending
it not move forward he had not meant not to move it to City Council, because they were the
ones who had the say. His intent in making the motion was he felt this board was not ready to
go, but if this would have a bigger effect the elected officials needed to make a decision. The
City Attorney advised if that had been his intent, to recommend to Council that Council not
move forward, then it could be brought to Council to say that was the board’s
recommendation.
MOTION:
Mr. Present made a motion to rescind the prior motion, seconded by Mr. Rubins.
Motion carried 6-1 with Mr. Hansen opposed.
Discussion ensued.
MOTION:
Mr. Present moved to recommend to City Council that the Council not move forward
with Petition CPTA-06-08-000006 at this time. Mr. Rubins seconded the motion. There
were four nay votes. Mi. Solomon stated he believed there was confusion; that the reason to
move it forward was you could only go to the state for comprehensive plan changes once a
year. The City Attorney advised that it was the duty of the board to move yes or no on things
that come before the board and they could delay to consider further; but in this case that
would be a one-year delay, not a normal delay. Chair Kunkle commented there had been two
motions at opposite ends but both with the result that this board was not ready to move this to
City Council. Mi. Solomon stated he had been under a misconception when he voted-he
had wanted to move it on to City Council whether or not they voted to approve it, and asked
to change his vote. The City Attorney advised he could change his vote-that a motion could
be made to reconsider and have a change in the vote. Mi. Present stated to hrther clarify, that
this was too big an issue and he had not wanted to delay it a year and in their wisdom, the
Council should vote whether to move it forward or not. Following further discussion, Mi.
Solomon stated he was in favor of forwarding this to City Council but was against the
recommendation that they not approve it, which was the cause of his confusion.
Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes h.
September 12, 2006
Page 4
MOTION:
Mr. Solomon moved for reconsideration
'1
and restatement of the motion so that
whatever the outcome, the board would know what they were voting on. Chair Kunkle
stated this was a motion to reconsider the prior motion. Mr. Kanel seconded the
motion. Chair Kunkle stated this motion was to rescind the prior motion that failed by
4 votes to send to City Council. Chair Kunkle asked all in favor to rescind prior motion
say Aye. There were only 2 votes Aye. Chair Kunkle stated that was strike three and it
dies on the vine. The City Attorney stated this could not go forward to Council that was
the result of the vote.
OLD BUSINESS
There was no old business to come before the board.
NEW BUSINESS
There was no new business to come before the board.
Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes
September 12, 2006
Page 5
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:02 p.m. The next regular
meeting will be held September 26, 2006.
APPROVED:
Craig Kunkle, Jr., Chair
- Barry Present, Vice Chair
Dennis Solomon
Randolph Hansen
Douglas Pennell
Michael Panczak
Jonathan Rubins
Joy Hecht
Amir Kanel
Debbie Andrea, Recording Coordinator for the Meeting .
Note: These summary minutes are prepared in compliance with 286.011 F.S. and are not
verbatim transcripts of the meeting. A verbatim audio record is available from the Office' of the
City Clerk. 0
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
REGULAR MEETING
September 26,2006
MINUTES
The Regular Meeting of the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board of the City of Palm Beach
Gardens, Florida, was called to order by Chair Craig Kunkle, at 6:30 P.M. in the Council
Chambers of the Municipal Complex, 10500 North Military Trail, Palm Beach Gardens;
Florida, and opened with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
-
REPORT BY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR
Ms. Kara Irwin, Growth Management Administrator, reported at their September 20, 2006 .
meeting, City Council approved transmittal of the biotech overlay to the Department'of
Community Affairs.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Chair Kunkle announced the minutes of the September 12,2006 meeting had been pulled and
would be re-submitted for approval.
' -"
+ -ROLL CALL:
Debbie Andrea, Recording' Coordinator for the meeting, called the roll for the Planning,
Zoning and Appeals Board:
Present
Chair Craig Kunkle
Vice Chair Barry Present
Dennis Solomon
Randolph Hansen
Michael Panczak
Douglas Pennell
Joy Hecht (1 sr Alt.)
Amir Kanel (2nd Alt.)
Absent
Jonathan Rubins
Public Hearing and Recommendation to Citv Council:
PUD-04-03: Legends at the Gardens
Public Hearina and Recommendation to City Council: A request by Don Hearing of v Cotleur & Hearing, on behalfof Joel Prince, to allow for an amendment to the Legends at
the Gardens Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (PUD), whiclz was approved by
Ordinance 7, 2003 on March 6, 2003. The applicant is proposing to amend the master site
plan to allow a 13,729 square foot retail building (Walgreens) and an 11,200 square-foot
general office building. The 21.72 acre subject site is located at the soutlzwest corner of the
intersection of central Boulevard and Donald Ross Road.
.
Chair Kunkle announced this item had been pulled from the agenda.
Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes
September 26,2006
Page 2
Public Hearing and Recommendation to Citv Council:
Petition LDR-05-08: LDR Test amendment - Development Name and Address Standards
Public Hearing & Recommendation to City Council: A City-initiated amendment to‘ the
City’s Code of Ordinances by amending Chapter 78, “Land Development”, as it relates to
addresses, subdivision names, street names, and the Addressing Committee.
Aries Page, GIS Manager, presented the staff report containing changes since the last
presentation.
Chair Kunkle declared the public hearing open. Hearing no comments from the public, Chair
Kunkle declared the public hearing closed.
In response to questions from the board, Mr. Page explained that staff had met with the
police and fire departments and would research a regulation regarding distance from the road
to the house; confirmed that the text in its entirety had been shown; explained that the
provision for street names to run the entire length of the street was for new development only
and applied even if the roadway continued through another development.
MOTION:
Mr. Solomon made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of Petition LDR-
05-08 as submitted by staff. Motion was seconded by Mr. Pennell and carried by
unanimous 7-0 vote.
Public Hearinn and Recommendation to Citv Council:
CPTA-06-08-000006: Future Land Use Test Amendment for Bioscience Mixed-Use
Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council: A City-initiated request for an
amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan to create a
Bioscience Mixed-Use land- use designation and criteria relative to workforce housing.
Kara Irwin, Growth Management Administrator, explained the comprehensive planning
process, and the process for amendments to the comprehensive plan. Ms. Irwin reviewed the
proposed text amendment, which had been presented at the last meeting.
In response to questions and comments from the board, Ms. Irwin explained that the
proposed 20% requirement for workforce housing sould change through the process, since it
was a determination for a waiver, and that percentage might be changed by City Council.
How that percentage would be allocated and apportioned would be covered in a development
order for a project. Mr. Solomon expressed his opinion that there should be some criteria
addressing this in the amendment. Ms. Irwin confirmed this text amendment did not address
existing definitions of height within the comprehensive plan, and in this case the intensity
and density would be limited by a FAR (Floor Area Ratio) requirement of .6 for bioscience
use and .1 for commercial uses. The qualifying multiplier for income was explained, also
explained was that in this overlay a request could be made of City Couhcil to go higher than
four stories in a MXD residential component, so long as the workforce housing requirement
was met, and the proposed amendment would not waive any other supplemental regulations
Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes
September 26,2006
Page 3
in the LDR's for incoming projects. Ms. Irwin explained the forbearance agreement had not
applied to the Briger site, so they would have to go through the concurrency and CULLS
processes on their own. Staff provided an example of a FAR (Floor Area Ratio) calculation.
Mr. Kanel expressed concern that there were no rules for waivers. Mr. Present expressed his
opinion that housing did not belong in the bioscience centers and he felt this would open the
door for more housing, to which Ms. Irwin responded this was to protect the inventory.
t
Chair Kunkle declared the public hearing open. Carolyn Chaplik; Hudson Bay Drive,
expressed concerns regarding the increase in density and workforce housing, and suggested
the Governor might place rental housing in Save our Homes and homestead exemptions. The
City Attorney clarified for Mr. Solomon that the .6 FAR was the maximum allowed if all
other requirements were met. Eileen Tucker, Shady Lakes, read a letter from the PGA
Corridor Residents Coalition to the City Clerk which was a public information request for all
information regarding the Briger site, Scripps, and workforce housing from September 12 to
the present. Ms. Tucker expressed her opinion it would not matter if this was not passed on
for four months, that workforce housing would still not be affordable for many people, asked
who would monitor the criteria for workforce housing, and stated she believed there were
Kunkle declared the public hearing closed.
"
many more questions to be answered. Hearing no further comments from the public, Chair .I
,*
Mr. Solomon commented the City would have to monitor the income requirement for
workforce housing, commented on the income range for workforce housing, and the height
requirement, and indicated he was satisfied with the proposed ' amendment. Mr. Hansen
clarified this was not a project but would give flexibility to create projects, and expressed
support for the waiver process and for the proposed amendment. Mr. Kanel commented on
public perception. Mr. Pennell clarified this only applied to MXD in the bioscience overlay
and allowed these things to be considered.
MOTION:
Mr. Solomon made a motion to recommend to City Council approval of Petition CPTA-
06-08-000006 as submitted. Mr. Hansen seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Voting aye
were Ms. Hecht, Mr. Pennell, Mr. Solomon, Mr. Hansen, Mr. Panczak, and Chair
Kunkle. Mr. Present voted nay. Chair Kunkle announced the motion carried by a 6-1
vote.
OLD BUSINESS
There was no old business to come before the board.
NEW BUSINESS
Kara Irwin, Growth Management Administrator announced a charrette concerning height
would be held October 25,2006 and November 1,2006 at 6 p.m.
Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board Meeting Minutes
September 26,2006
Page 4
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:Ol p.m. The next regular
meeting will be held October 10,2006.
APPROVED:
Craig Kunkle, Jr., Chair
. Barry Present, Vice Chair
Dennis Solomon
Randolph Hansen
Douglas Pennell
Michael Panczak
Jonathan Rubins
Joy Hecht
1
Amir Kanel
Debbie Andrea, Recording Coordinator for the Meeting
Note: These summary minutes are prepared in compliance with 286.011 F.S. and are not
verbatim transcripts of the meeting. A verbatim audio record is available from the Office of the 0 City Clerk.
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
Agenda Cover Memorandum
PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD . 1_
Date Prepared: September 20,'2006
Meeting Date: October 10,2006
Petition No. CUMJ-06-01-000001
S u biec tlAqe n d a I tem :
9 Allan Owens,
, Administrator a
Petition CUMJ-06-04 -000001 - Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
Public Hearing and Recommendation to City Council: A request by Anne Booth of Urban
Design Studio, agent for Temple Judea of Palm Beach County, Inc., for approval of an
amendment to an existing Major Conditional Use to allow a 4,359 square-foot classroom
building. The three-acre site is located on the north side of Hood Road, 0.2 mile.west of
Alternate AI A.
Action:
[ ]Approved
[ X ] Recommendation to Approve with Conditions
[ ] Operating
[XI Other NA
1 Recommendatic
Attachments
Project Narrative,
Conditional Use Overlay
Analysis, Applicant's
Response to DRC
9 to denv
Reviewed by:
City Attorney:
Christine P. Tatum
Development Compliance:
Bahareh K. Wolfs, AlCP
Growth Manaaement
Kara Irwin, AlCP
Approved By:
City Manager:
Ronald M. Ferris
Originating Dept.:
Growth Management:
Pro%d& Manager
Jackie Hollhnan, AlCP
Planner
[ X] Quasi-Judicial
[ ] Legislative
[ X] Public Hearing
Advertised:
Date: 9/29/06
Paper: Palm Beach
Post
[ X] Required
Finance Dept.: Planning, Zoning, and
Appeals Board
n I [ ] App. w/ conditions
[ ] Denied
[ ] Rec. Approval
[ ] Rec. Approval
wlconditions
[ ] Rec. Denial .
[ ] Continued to:
%
Funding Source:
B ud g e t Acc t .#:
NA
Comments
DRC Comments
o Location Map
Previous Approvals
wlcurrent site plan
Proposed plans
0
0
e
e
Religious Facility
To the North, East, & West:
Evergrene PCD
To the South:
The Isles/Seacoast Utility Authority
Date Prepared: September 20,2006
Meeting Date: October 10,2006
Petition No. CUMJ-06-01-000001
Conditional Use Overlay Residential Medium - RM ~
Planned Community
Development (PCD)
Residential Low/Public or
Institutional - RL-YPI
Residential Medium - RM
Residential Low-RL and
Public or Institutional-.P/I
BACKGROUND
The subject property was originally approved in November of 1976 by Palm Beach County
through a rezoning from AG-Agricultural District to RE-Residential Estate District with a
Special Exception for a Church and Accessory Facilities (comparable to a Conditional Use
approval in the City of Palm Beach Gardens). In October of 1988, the City annexed the
property into the City limits through the adoption of Ordinance 42, 1988.
On November 14, 2003, an Administrative Approval (ADMIN-03-68) was granted for roof
repair and replacement, an outdoor patio enclosure to be used as an office, and enclosure
of the entrance foyer.
At its April 13,2004, meeting, the Planning, Zoning, and Appeals Board voted to approve,
with conditions, a minor site plan amendment (Petition SP-03-04) allowing the construction
of a covered walkway, porte-cochere, new access drive, and other minor site
improvements to the Temple Judea site.
Through adoption of Resolution 85, 2004 on May 6, 2004, the City Council approved the
Plat of Temple Judea.
All previously approved modifications have been7completed.
LAND USE AND ZONING DESIGNATIONS
The current zoning designation of the property is Residential Low Density (RL-1) with a
Major Conditional Use Overlay. The City’s Future Land Use Map identifies the property as
having a future land-use designation of Residential Medium (RM). The existing use as a
“Church or Place of Worship, under 1000 seats” is an approved Major Conditional Use
category in the RL-1 Residential Low Density Zoning District. This use is also consistent
with the Future Land Use Map designation of Residential Medium (RM).
EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
PROJECT DETAILS
The applicant is currently requesting approval of an amendment to an existing Major
Conditional Use to allow an auxiliary4,359 square-foot building with a porte-cochere at the *
2
Date Prepared: September 20,2006
Meeting Date: October 10,2006
Petition No. CUMJ-06-01-000001
rear of the existing Temple Judea synagogue on the northwest corner of the site. The
additional classrooms have become necessary to accommodate classes for the existing
youth and adult synagogue members. It should be noted that the new classrooms shall
only be used for religious teaching purposes and are not intended to be used as a regular
school, which would require a separate Conditional Use approval.
Location of Classroom Building
During the site plan review, staff suggested that the applicant consider other locations for
the classroom addition including the middle of the rear portion of the site and the northeast
corner of the site since the homes to the north and east are separated from the site by a
roadway and do not have rear yards facing the site. The applicant, however, concluded
that the proposed location is most appropriate because (1) a dry detention area can be
placed on the northeast side while preserving the existing picnic area on the west portion of
the site, which is surrounded by mature Slash Pine trees; and (2) it provides for the most
suitable traffic circulation pattern on the site.
The proposed building will be located 50 feet east of the western property line, which will
provide a 75-foot buffer area between the building and the residential lots.
Concurren c v
On January 20,2006, Temple Judea received concurrency certification for traffic, drainage,
solid waste, sewer and water. No additional seats are being added to the sanctuary, and
the proposed classroom addition will generate 43 new daily trips, which meets the Traffic
Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. The build-out date for the project has
been set for December 31,2010.
0
Access and Circulation
Ingress and egress to the Temple Judea site is via two driveways on the north side of Hood
Road. The two existing entrances into the facility will not be affected by the new classroom
building. Hood Road is currently being expanded to four lanes with a new median, which
will include an east-bound left-turn lane into the eastern-most entrance of the synagogue
parking lot.
The locations of the proposed building and the drop-off area have been designed to
complement the existing driveway circulation patterns. There are no modifications being
proposed to any other area of the site, or to either of the existing driveways into the site.
Ph a sinq
The construction of this building will occur in one phase.
3
Date Prepared: September 20, 2006
Meeting Date: October IO, 2006
Petition No. CUMJ-06-01-000001
Architecture
The proposed 21-foot high building with a porte-cochere has been designed to match the
architecture, colors, materials, and characteristics of the existing synagogue building. The ‘
new building will include arches, pre-cast columns, cast stone, and banding. The Spanish
“S” Tejas Borja roof tiles will be a “Centenaria Ground” color. The stucco finish will be
Sherwin Williams Alabaster SW 7008 and Muslin SW 5133, or similar.
Lighting
The applicant has previously replaced all existing parking lot lighting to meet current code
standards. The addition of the drop-off drive aisle required only a small modification to the
existing light on the south side of the landscape area south of the drive aisle. The site
photometric plan has been modified to make the necessary adjustment.
Landscape Plans
The landscape plan has been modified to include the proposed classroom building. All
landscaping material being proposed around the new building is consistent with the
landscape plantings previously approved and planted on the site. The building has been
located to minimize the number of trees that shall be removed, while avoiding conflicts with
underground utilities, and providing convenient access.
The site is surrounded by the Evergrene PCD which has provided a fence and 25-foot
buffer around the north, east, and western perimeters of the site. The applicant has
previously supplemented the existing perimeter landscaping with a hedge and several
trees.
0
The site requires 5,619 landscape points, and 6,963 points have been provided. The
applicant has provided a landscape plan which includes beautification of the Hood Road
shoulder.
Parkinq
Section 78-345 of the City Code requires one space for every three seats in the sanctuary,
plus one space for each 250 square feet of office space and one space for each
classroom. Therefore, the current required parking for the existing building is 75 spaces
(21 1 seats and 931 square feet of office). Seven additional parking spaces are required
met this requirement by providing 82 parking spaces, including 77 paved and 5 grass
parking spaces.
I for the seven proposed classrooms for a total of 82 required parking spaces. The site has
Signage
There is an existing 6’ x 5’4” monument sign at the easternmost entry, which was
A 10” high x 25’ long wall sign is previously approved and will remain unchanged.
4
Date Prepared: September 20,2006
Meeting Date: October 10,2006
Petition No. CUMJ-06-01-000001 .
proposed for the building entrance on the south elevation of the new classroom building.
This sign will cover 53% of the surface to which it will be attached and is, therefore, less
. than the 70% allowed by Code.
Drainaqe
The project is located within flood zone “B” within the Intracoastal drainage basin of the
’ South Florida Water Management District. There is an existing on-site dry retention pond
located in the south portion of the site that discharges into the Hood Road drainage
system. No changes are proposed for this south basin.
The northern portion of the site currently discharges to the Evergrene system. A new dry
retention pond with a “spreader swale” is proposed within the northern portion of the site to
allow the discharge to continue to the north into the Evergrene drainage basin. Drainage
plans are included in this application that have been reviewed and approved by the City’s
engineering consu I ta n ts, LB F H .
WAIVERS
No waivers are being requested with this application.
CONDITIONAL USE ANALYSIS 0 - Attached is a Conditional Use Analysis provided by the Applicant in accordance with
Section 78-52, Conditional Uses, (d) Criteria, of the Land Development Regulations. This
analysis indicates that the proposed classroom addition is consistent with the site’s existing
Conditional Use designation.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends APPROVAL of Petition CUMJ-06-01-000001, subject to the following
cond it ions:
Existing Conditions from Petition SP-03-24 - PZAB Approval Letter Dated April 13, 2004:
1. Within 120 days of approval of the subject petition, the Applicant shall provide a
landscape plan for the northern road shoulder and median of the portion of Hood
Road adjacent to the Temple Judea site for review and approval by the City
Forester. Said landscaping shall be installed by the applicant, or through a separate
agreement acceptable to the City provide bond, surety, or monies based on the
Hood Road landscape plans to have the landscaping installed, within 60 days of the
completion of the Hood Road improvements. (City Forester)
2. The applicant, successors, or assigns shall bear its proportionate share of the cost
of the continued landscape maintenance of the northern road shoulder and one-half
(%) of the median of the portion of Hood Road adjacent to the Temple Judea site.
5
Date Prepared: September 20,2006
Meeting Date: October 10,2006
Petition No. CUMJ-06-01-000001
In the event a special district is formed by the City of Palm Beach Gardens, or
another entity, pertaining to the landscape maintenance of Hood Road, then Temple
the Applicant, its successors, or assigns shall
automatically become a member. This condition may be amended at any time by a
separate agreement between the applicant and the City of Palm Beach Gardens.
(City Forester)
3. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from view. (Planning and
Zoning)
4. If at any time the City determines that the grass parking spaces are in disrepair or
poor appearance due to lack of maintenance, the City may require the owner or
successor to correct the deficiency within 30 calendar days of receipt of written
notice from the City. Upon failure by the owner or successor to comply therewith in
the time provided, the City may require the parking spaces to be totally or partially
paved within 150 days of receipt by the owner or successor of written notice. All
such paving shall be conducted in accordance with the City’s standards at the time
of paving. All such costs shall be the responsibility of the owner or successor.
(Planning and Zoning)
New Conditions: 0 Miscellaneous
5. Should the new classroom building be converted to a regular school in the future, a
new Major Conditional Use approval shall be required. (Planning & Zoning)
6. Required digital files of approved civil engineering, as-built design, and architectural
drawings shall be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Division prior to issuance of
the first Certificate of Occupancy for the “new building. (GIs Manager)
7. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the new building, the
Applicant shall install the buffer along Hood Road adjacent to the Temple Judea
site. An extension may be granted by the Growth Management Administrator upon
review of sufficient justification and receipt of surety acceptable to the City. (City
Forester)
8. Within 60 days of the approval, the applicant shall enter into a cost sharing
agreement with the Isles Homeowners Association for the continued landscape
maintenance for its proportionate share of the cost of the Hood Road median
adjacent to the Temple Judea site. In the event the Isles PUD or the Evergrene
PCD enters into a cost share agreement with the City of Palm Beach Gardens or
other entity, pertaining to the landscape maintenance of the Hood Road median
adjacent to Temple Judea of Palm Beach County, Inc., then Temple Judea of Palm
Beach County, Inc. shall enter into a cost sharing agreement with the City for its
proportionate share. (City Forester) 0
I
6
Date Prepared: September 20, 2006
Meeting Date: October IO, 2006
Petition No. CUMJ-06-01-000001
Citv Engineer 0
9. Applicant shall copy to the City all permit applications, permits, certifications and
approvals. (City Engineer)
1O.Applicant shall provide all necessary construction zone signage and fencing as
required by the City Engineer. (City Engineer)
11. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration
permit, applicant shall provide cost estimates in accordance with LDR Section 78-
309 and 78-461 and for on-site project improvements, not including public
infrastructure, or landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the
City. The cost estimates shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and landscape
architect registered in the state of Florida and shall be posted with the City, prior to
the issuance of the first land alteration permit. (City Engineer)
12.The construction, operation and/or maintenance of any elements of the subject
project shall not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage of surrounding
areas. If, at any time during the project development, it is determined by the City
that any of the surrounding areas are experiencing negative drainage impacts
caused by the project, it shall be the applicant’s responsibility to cure said impacts in
a period of time and a manner acceptable to the City prior to additional construction
activities . (City E ng i nee r)
13.Prior to issuance of the first land alteration permit, applicant shall submit
signed/sealed/dated construction plans (paving/grading/drainage and watedsewer)
and all pertinent calculations for review and comment. (City Engineer)
14.Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration
permit, applicant shall schedule a pre-permit meeting with City staff. (City Engineer)
15. Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit the applicant shall provide to
the City letters of authorization from the applicable utility companies allowing
landscaping and light poles to be placed within the utility easements. (City
Engineer)
16.The Applicant shall notify the City’s Public Works Division at least ten working days
prior to the commencement of any workkonstruction activity within any public right-
of-way within the City of Palm Beach Gardens. In the case of a City right-of-way, the
applicant has at least five working days to obtain a right-of-way permit. Right-of-way
permits may be obtained at the Building Division. Failure to comply with this ,
condition could result in a Stop Work Order of all workkonstruction activity within
the public right-of-way and the subject development site.” (Public Works)
7
Date Prepared: September 20,2006
Meeting Date: October 10, 2006
Petition No. CUMJ-06-01-000001
0 Police CPTED
17.Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall prepare a
construction site security and management plan for approval by the City's Police
Department CPTED Official. (Police)
t
a. The developerlproject manager after site clearing and. placement of
construction trailers shall institute security measures to reduce or eliminate
opportunities for theft. The management plan shall include, but not be limited
to, temporary lighting, security personnel, vehicle' barriers, construction/
visitor pass, reducelminimize entrylexit points, encourage sub contractors to
secure machinery, tools at end of work day and/or any other measure
deemed .appropriate to provide a safe and secure working environment.
(Police)
b. The security management plan shall be maintained throughout the
construction phase of the project. Non-compliance with the approved plan
shall result in a stop-work order for the entire planned unit development.
(Police)
18. Lighting locations shall not conflict with landscaping, including long term tree canopy
growth. (Police)
19. Metal Halide lighting shall be used for all street and pedestrian walkways. (Police)
Jh/Case Files/Temple JudealStaff report PZAB
8
10' x 18.5' Yes
6963.3 Yes
Date Prepared: September 20,2006
Meeting Date: October 10,2006
Petition No. CUMJ-06-01-000001
SITE ANALYSIS
Temple Judea - Classroom Expansion
Open Svace NIA
15,000 SF
48 Yo yes a
3 acres Minimum Site Area
100' 361.5' 'I Minimum Lot Width
Maximum Density
Maximum Building Lot
Coverage
2 ddac
35%
Maximum Building
Height
36 feet Yes 24 feet +/- w 55 feet (Main Facility)
Setbacks
Front 55 feet
Side 15' or 10% of lot width
(3 6')
50 feet (Auxiliary
Building)
Rear 25 feet
Parking
Required 82 (4 accessible) 82 spaces required
(4 accessible)
10 feet x 18.5 feet Stall Dimensions
Ground Signs
Number Allowed 1 for 300 feet of ROW
frontage, + 1 per
additional 700 feet ROW
frontage)
15 feet-from ROW line
50 feet-side property line
1 5 ft length/ 10 ft height
maximum, 60 square feet
face area maximum
Setbach 15' from ROW line, 62'
* from side property line
loft length
8 % ft height
Dimensions
5619.24
9
PROJECT NARRATIVE
TEMPLE JUDEA
CLASSROOM EXPANSION PROJECT 0
January 4,2006
February 21,2006
September 6,2006 Urban Design
Urban Planning
Land Planning
Landscape Architecture
Requestllocation
This is a request for an amendment to an existing Major Conditional Use to allow a modification to
the approved Temple Judea site plan to include an accessory classroom building. The three acre
Temple Judea Synagogue site is located at 43 1 1 Hood Road approximately 1/4 mile east of the
intersection of Hood Road and Military Trail. The properties to the west, north and east of the site
are part of the Evergrene PCD. To the south of Hood Road are the Seacoast Utility Authority
Water Treatment Plant and The Isles PCD.
The proposed site plan amendment is to allow the addition of a 4359 square foot auxiliary
classroom building to the rear of the main facility. This proposed building is for the use of the
existing members for religious classes. Since the move to Palm Beach Gardens, and the
construction of the beautiful new facilities, the younger members of the Temple congregation have
been much more active and the demand for religious classes has increased. The existing classroom
space within the main building has been serving a dual purpose for both adult and children's classes
and logistically has become a problem for the members as they need to move furniture in and out of
the classrooms before each class depending on the size of the occupants. Therefore, the
congregation would like to provide permanent space for both adult classes and children's classes
through the construction of the additional classroom building.
The attached site plan proposes only minor modifications to the approved site plan with the addition
of the new building, a driveway/drop-off area with a porta-cochere, and the associated required
landscape improvements. These proposed changes are in compliance with the City's Land
Development Regulations and will not require any waiver requests. No other changes to the site
plan are proposed at this time.
History
The current zoning designation is RL- 1 with a Conditional Use Overlay and
the Future Land Use Plan designation is RM-Residential Multi Family. This,,, s. Rosemary Avenue
property was originally approved in November 1976 by Palm Beach
County as a Rezoning from AG-Agricultural District to RE-Residential
Estate District with a Special Exception for a Church and Accessory
Gardens). In October 1988 the City of Palm Beach Gardens annexed the
property under Ordinance 42, 1988. In 2003 and 2004, the Temple secured
Administrative and Miscellaneous approval from the city for roof repairs,
Suite 225 - The Lofts at City Place
West Palm
561.366.1100 561.366.1111 fax 1
www.UDSonline.com
LCC35
FL 33401
Facilities (comparable to a Conditional Use approval in Palm Beach
extensive remodeling of the flont facade, interior renovations and upgrades to the landscaping and
lighting for the overall site. All previously approved modifications have been completed.
Future Land Use Plan and Zoning Compliance 0
The existing use as a “Church or Place of Worshp, under 1000 seats” is an approved conditional
use category in the R-1 Residential Low Density District. This is also a use that is consistent with
the Future Land Use Plan designation of RM - Residential Medium.
Traffic/Circulation
The proposed classroom building is for the use of the existing members of the synagogue for
religious classes that are currently being held inside the main facility. There will be no additional
seats added to the sanctuary therefore the proposed modification is only expected to increase the
number of trips to and from the site by three. The attached traffic statement indicates that the three
trips are less than the 2-lane capacity standard for Hood Road and that no further link or
intersection analysis is required.
The location of the proposed building and the drop-off area have been designed to take advantage
of the efficiency of the existing driveway circulation patterns. There are no modifications being
proposed to any other area of the site, or to either of the existing driveways into the site.
Phasing
The building is proposed to be constructed in one phase. The building will include 4359 square feet
lab. Each classroom will include direct access to a restroom.
with 7 classrooms which are approximately 400 square feet each and a 203 square foot computer
Access
Roadway access to the site is from Hood Road. The two existing entrances into the facility will not
be affected by this application request. Hood Road construction has just been recently completed to
expand the two lane roadway to a four lane median divided roadway. The new median includes an
east bound approach left turn lane into the eastern most entrance of the Temple parking lot.
Existing Zoning and Land Use Designations & Site Comparison
1 EXISTING USE
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Religious Facility
TO THE NQRIFHB:
Evergreene PCD
ZONING
RL-1 Residential Low with a
Conditional Use Overlay
FUTURE LAND USE
Rh4
PCD IRM
Temple Judea - Narrative
January 4,2006
EXISTING USE ZONING
TO THE SOUTH.
The Isles/SUAWTP RL3 -PUD and PI
February 2 1,2006
September 6,2006
Page 3
FUTURE LAND USE
RL and P
Evergrene PCD
Evergrene PCD
TO THE WEST:
PCD RM
PCD RM
Comparison (per code Allowed Proposed ' Compliance Waiver unless otherwise noted) Requested
Open Space N/A 48 % Yes
Minimum Site Area 15,000 SF 3 acres Yes
Minimum Lot Width 100' 361.5'
Maximum Density 2 ddac None Yes
Maximum Building Lot 35% 14% Yes
Maximum Building 36 feet 24 feet +/- Yes
Coverage
Height
Front 55 feet 55 feet (Main Facility) Yes
Side 15' or 10% of lot width 50 feet Yes
(36')
Rear 25 feet 25 feet
Required 82 spaces required 82 (4 accessible) Yes
(4 accessible)
Stall Dimensions 10 feet x 18.5 feet 1O'x 18.5' Yes
Temple Judea - Narrative
January 4,2006
February 21,2006
September 6,2006
Page 4
Comparison (per code
unless otherwise noted)
Number Allowed
~~~
Setbacks r
Dimensions
Allowed
1 for 300 feet of ROW
frontage, + 1 per
additional 700 feet ROW
frontage) .
15 feet-from ROW line
50 feet-side property line
15 ft length4 0 ft height
maximum, 60 square feet
face area maximum
Proposed
1
15' from ROW line, 62' from
side property line
loft length
I 8 % ft height
Compliance Waiver I Requested
I Points I 56 19.24 I 6963.3 I
Architectural Style and Special Features 0 The proposed classroom building and porta-cochere have been designed to match the architectural
colors, materials and architectural characteristics of the main building. The proposed classroom
building has been designed to include the use of arches, columns, cast stone, banding, and roof tile,
consistent with the existing synagogue facility.
Lighting
The applicant has previously replaced all existing parking lot lighting to meet current code
standards. The addition of the drop off drive aisle requires only a small modification to the existing
light on the south side of the landscape area south of the drive aisle. The site photometric plan is
being modified to make the necessary adjustment and will be submitted under separate cover.
Landscape Plans
The applicant has modified the previously approved landscape plan to include the proposed
classroom building. All landscaping material being proposed around the new building is consistent
with the landscape planting theme previously approved and planted on the site. The building has
been located to minimize the number of trees that need to be removed while avoiding conflicts with
underground utilities, and providing convenient access.
The property surrounding this site is the Evergrene PCD which has provided a fence and 25' buffer 0 around the north, east and western perimeters of the site. The applicant has previously
Temple Judea - Narrative
January 4,2006
February 2 1,2006
September 6,2006
Page 5
.. 'supplemented the existing perimeter landscaping with a hedge and several trees. At the request of
the city staff, the proposed building has been located 50 feet east of western property line which
will provide a 75' buffer area between the building and the residential lots.
Parking
Parking on the site is provided in accordance with Section 78-345, Table 33, Public and
Institutional, Churches and Places of Worship. This provision of the code requires 1 space for
every 3 seats in the sanctuary, plus one space for each 250 square feet of office space. Based on
this provision, the required parking is 75 spaces (21 1 seats and 931 square feet of office). An
additional 7 spaces are required for the additional 7 classrooms. There are 82 existing spaces
provided, including 77 paved and 5 grass parking spaces. There have been no modifications to the
parking as a result of this request.
Signage
,a The applicant is proposing one (1) building identifier sign for the proposed classroom structure. The
sign is proposed to be consistent with the approved type style used for the ground signage in front
of the main Temple building. The previously approved entrance ground sign has been constructed
and is located adjacent to the eastern most entrance.
Drainage
The addition of the proposed auxiliary classroom building requires the construction of a dry
retention area at the northeast corner of the site. Close attention has been given to the placement of
the retention area to avoid the loss of existing trees.
<
WAIVERS
The applicant is not requesting any waivers.
0
CQNDITIONAL USE OVERLAY ANALYSIS
TEMPLE JUDEA CLASSROOM EXPANSION * Urban Design PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA
APRIL 4,2006
Urban Planning
Land Planning
Landscape Architecture
The Temple Judea Synagogue was most recently approved on April 13,2004 for Minor Site Plan
Review to allow the construction of a covered walk-way, porte-cochere , new access drive, and other
minor site plan modifications. Since that approval, it has been determined by the City of Palm Beach
Gardens, and subsequently modified in the City’s LDRs, that this site is a Conditional Use and all
modifications to the Temple Judea site would have to meet the requirements of a modification to a
Conditional Use
This application is requesting approval for the construction of an auxiliary classroom building to be
constructed at the rear of the site.
In accordance with Section 78-52. Conditional Uses, the following is a Conditional Use Analysis
based on the criteria as set forth in that section.
0 (1) Comprehensive Plan. The proposed use is consistent with the comprehensive plan.
The Temple Judea Synagogue is an existing and approved use. The proposed classroom
building is an expansion of the existing use within the synagogue. The Future Land Use Plan
(FLUP) designation for this property is M-Residential Medium. A religious facility or place
of worship is consistent with this designation.
Chapter requirements. The proposed use is consistent with all applicable requirements of
this chapter.
(2)
The Temple Judea Synagogue is an existingplace of worship which is a conditional use allowed
in the RLl district. This request is for the approval of the construction of an facility to allow the
expansion of a use currently being provided within the main structure. The proposed plan
meets all code requirements and does not require waiversfrom the code for approval.
(3) Standards. The proposed use is consistent with the standards for such use as provided in
Section 78-159.
t
The Temple Judea Synagogue is an existing facility with an approved
site plan. The proposed classroom building is in compliance with all
requirements of the standards in Section 78-159(49). (see below)
477 s. Rosemary Avenue
Suite 225 - The Lofts at City Place
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
561.366.1 100
www.UDSonline.com
LCC35
561.366.1 11 1 fax
\\pbgsfile\Growth_Management\P1anning_and-Zoning\jholloman\CASE FILESTEMPLE JUDEA\UDS C
LCC 35 WUll L1 -e - --
*
Section 78-159 Permitted uses, conditional, and prohibited, Table 21 : Permitted uses,
Conditional, and Prohibited Use Chart, (49) - Churches and places of worship.
+1. a. Less than 1,000 permanent seats or approved capacity may be located as a major
conditional use in any residential zoning district, and in CG-1, CG-2, and P&I zoning
districts.
The Temple Judea Synagogue is an existing facility with less than 1000 seats. The original
facility was in existence prior to the construction of the surrounding residential community.
This application is a request to expand a use within the facility to allow for additional
classroom space for religious teaching. There are 21 1 seats in the synagogue which qualifi this
facility as less than 1000 seats.
b. More than 1,000 permanent seats or approved capacity may be located as a major
conditional use in the following districts: CG-1, CG-2, PI, M-1, M-lA, and M-2.
This Temple Judea facility does not meet this criteria as it is under 1000 seats.
c. Typical uses associated with churches and places of worship include the following:
1. Sanctuaries, assembly halls, or similar large meeting rooms where religious services
are held;
2. Community centers or fellowship halls, which may be the site of religious services, but
also used for community, athletic, fraternal, social, civic, charitable, and recreational
programs;
3. Offices utilized for administrative purposes related to the operation of the church or
place of worship;
4. Religious merchandise or merchandise related to the operation of the house of
worship may be sold in an accessory retail facility;
5. Playgrounds and athletic fields; and
6. Rectory or similar residence for religious officials, limited to one per place of worship.
0
The proposed classroom addition is consistent with the uses identified above.
d. The following uses may be included within any major conditional use approval granted by
the city council to establish a church or place of worship, or as an additional major
conditional use operating as part of the facility:
1. School, elementary or secondary;
2. Day care, child;
3. Day care, adult;
4. Assisted living facility; and
5. Monastery or convent.
\\pbgsfile\Growth~Management\Planning~and~Zoning\jholloman\CASE FILES\TEMPLE JUDEA\UDS CU Analysis 01 urban
LCC 35
This application is not requesting approval for any of these uses at this time. E
e. Additional standards applicable to churches and places of worship are provided below.
1. Up to 50 percent of required parking may be grassed consistent with section 78-373 of
this chapter.
The site currently provides 5 grass parking spaces which does not exceed the allowable
number of spaces.
2. Minimum lot size is two acres.
The site is 3.0 acres.
3. Churches and places of worship with more than 1,000 seats or approved capacity shall
be located on and provide primary vehicular access from the following roadways: city
collector, county minor arterial, state minor arterial, state, or state principal arterial.
The facility has less than 1000 seats.
4. Lighting for athletic fields, parking lots, and security shall be shielded from adjacent
residential zoning districts.
All lighting is shielded from the adjacent residential neighborhood.
5. All day care centers, elementary or secondary schools, monasteries or convents, or
assisted living facilities shall provide primary vehicular access from the following
roadways: city collector, county minor arterial, state minor arterial, state, or state
principal arterial.
The facility does not provide any of these uses.
f. Temporary uses such as special events, outsideservices, seasonal sales, seasonal displays,
other events of a limited nature may require a special events permit or approval-as
required in section 78-187.
This request is for site plan approval of an accessory structure, and does not include a request
for a special event permit.
(4) Public welfare. The proposed use provides for the public health; safety, and welfare by:
(a) Providing for a safe and effective means of pedestrian access;
Pedestrian access is provided through a sidewalk connection from Hood Road into the site,
adjacent to the synagogue and back to the proposed classroom building.
(b) Providing for a safe and effective means of vehicular ingress and egress;
Vehicular access to the site is from Hood Road, there are two access points which allow for
convenient access around the site.
Hood Road is a collector which is currently being expanded to a four lane median divided
section.
(d) Providing for a safe and efficient onsite traffic circulation, parking, and overall control;
(c) Providing for an adequate roadway system adjacent to and in front of the site;
and
Internal circulation and access is convenient and eficient.
\\pbgsfile\Growth_Management\Planning_and~Zoning\jholloman\CASE FILEYTEMPLE JUDEA\UDS CU Analysis 01 urban
LCC 35 deign ,Le .A
0
(e) Providing adequate access for public safety purposes, including fire and police protection.
TheJire andpolice departments have reviewed and approved access into and around the site.
(5) Screening and buffering. The proposed use utilizes such techniques as landscaping, screening,
buffering, site or building design, or business operation procedures to mitigate impacts on
surrounding properties, including such impacts as:
(a) Noise;
The design of the building has oriented the windows awayfiom the closest residential
neighbors.
All parking lot lighting includes reflectors and cutoff luminairs.
The proposed use does not generate odors.
There will not be any roof mounted equipment, and all ground mounted equipment will be
screened with landscaping.
Lighting has been designed to minimize impacts to the surrounding neighbors.
All signage will be oriented toward Hood Road, and will not impact the abuttingproperties.
All waste from the proposed classroom building will be disposed in the existing dumpsters.
The proposed facility does not intend to store merchandise or vehicles.
The proposed structure will be architecturally compatible with the existing facility in design,
color and materials.
(j) Hours of operation;
Classes are currently offered by Temple Judea two (2) days per week, Wednesday 4:00-6:00pm
and on Sundays from 9:30am until 12:OOpm. Classes are not given during the summer months.
(b) Glare;
(c) Odor;
(d) Ground, wall, or roof-mounted mechanical equipment;
(e) Perimeter, interior, and security lighting;
(0 Signs;
(g) Waste disposal and recycling;
(h) Outdoor storage of merchandise and vehicles;
(I) Visual impact;
,
\\pbgsfile\Growth_Management\P1anning_andZoning\jhoIloman\CASE FILES\TEMPLE JUDEA\UDS CU Analysis 040606.doc
LCC 35 urban
Conditional Use Overlay Analysis
Temple Judea Classroom Building 1
April 4,2006 .
Page 5
(6) Utilities. The proposed use minimizes or eliminates the impact of utility installation,
including underground and overhead utilities, on adjacent properties.
The proposed classroom structure has no impacts on current or future utility improvements and
requires only water and sewer connection, already provided on the site.
(7) Dimensional standards. The proposed use meets or exceeds all dimensional requirement
required by the chapter.
The proposed classroom structure meets the dimensional standards as set forth in this chapter.
(8) Neighborhood Plans. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, and
standards of neighborhood plans.
The Temple Judea Synagouge is an existing use and is consistent with the goals, objectives;
policies, and standards of the neighborhood plans. The proposed classroom structure is an
accessory use to the existing facility and therefore is also consistent.
(9) Compatibility. The overall compatibility of the proposed development with adjacent and area
uses, and character or area development:
The Temple Judea Synagouge is an existing use and is permitted as a conditional use within the 0
RLl district.
(10) Patterns of development. The proposed use will result in logical, timely, and orderly
development patterns.
The proposed classroom building will be esthetically compatible to the existing structure on the site
and it 's proximity in the rear of the property will be compatible with the streetscape of Hood Road.
This proposed classroom structure is part of an much needed expansion to continue to provide for
the needs of the members of the Temple.
(11) Purpose and intent. The proposed use will be in harmony with the general purpose and
intent of this chapter and the goals, objectives, and policies of the City.
t
The Temple Judea Synagouge is an existing use and permitted as a coizditional use within the RL-I
district.
(12) Adverse impact. The design of the proposed use and stru,ctures will minimize any adverse
visual impacts or impacts caused by the intensity of the use.
The proposed classroom structure has been adequately screened from the view of the abutting
residential community. The design of the building will be esthetically pleasing and consistent with
Conditional Use Overlay Analysis
Temple Judea Classroom Building
Apiil4,2006 .
'- 0 Page 6 -
the design of the main facility. .?
I' '
f
1 ', . *,
t i
'.
(13) Environmental impact. The design of the proposed use minimizes,any adverse impacts
that may be created, including impact on environmental and natural resources including
air, water; storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, and wetlands.
. -I
LL
There are no environmental impacts as a result of the construction of this priposed classroom
structure. The Temple Judea site is an existing development which has provided for all appropriate
required regulations.
., i . . '%
1 ".
.' ..
X'
August 25,2006
Mr. Michael Sanchez,
City of Palm Beach Gardens
Planning Manager
‘ urban
stu 10 ’
10500 N. Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
RE: TEMPLE JUDEA CLASSROOM EXPANSION Landscape Architecture
Urban Design
Urban Planning
Land Planning
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS
UDS REF # 03-024.02 (0
Dear Mike:
In response to the comments received from you, Bruce Gregg of SUA, Ross Gilmore, PBG
Forestry Technician, and Judy Dye of LBFH, we offer the following responses. For your
convenience, I have duplicated the comments in bold and our responses follow in italics.
COMMENTS FROM MICHAEL J. SANCHEZ, PLANNING MANAGER, GMD, AND
ROSS GILMORE, FORESTRY TECHNICLAN. DATED MAY 02,2006
1. Not Satisfied. In accordance with Section 78-3 13 of the LDR, a minimum of 75 percent of
the plant material proposed shall be from the City’s Preferred Species List for each of the
following categories: trees, palms, shrubs, and ground covers. Please revise the landscape
plan to show this requirement has been met for the entire site. I can provide assistance if
needed. Prior to the scheduling of P&Z, the applicant shall revise the plant list to place
all material, existing and proposed, in one of the following categories: trees, palms,
shrubs, and ground covers. Also, please provide documentation showing the preferred
species has been met for the entire site including existing and proposed material.
The attachedplans have been amended with the assistance of the City’s Forestry Technician
to resolve this comment.
2. Satisfied.
3. Not Satisfied. In accordance with Section 78-314 of the LDR, developments within
residential districts are required to provide minimum landscape points based on the amount
of open space provided as depicted in Table 28. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan
to show 5575.7 points as required for the entire site. Prior to the scheduling of P&Z, the
applicant shall provide CAD drawings for verification of open space with each
submittal. The current submittal proposes changes which may alter the amount of open
space provided. Once open space has been verified, the required amount of points will
need adjusted accordingly.
Please find enclosed an updated Open Space Plan, refectin the477 S. Rosemary Avenue
updated open space calculations Suite 225 - The Lofts at City Place
561.366.1 100
‘FALM \3CH GDNf West Palm Beach, FL 33401
561.366.1 11 1 fax
G UobsATernple Iudea\CU Amendment ZOOSL4pplicaiion Info\.S~\baff and LBFH Response Lir 0825 &d v$ 28 xi06 www.UDSonline.com
LCC35
( Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
August 25,2006 '
Page 2 0
4. Satisfied.
5. Satisfied.
6. Not Satisfied. In accordance with Section 78-306 of the LDR, all existing and proposed
utilities, easements, and light fixtures shall be shown on the landscape plan to'prevent
possible conflicts with the installation of landscaping. The landscape plan will need to take
these locations into consideration and be designed to prevent changes to the plan after City
Council approval. Please revise the site plan and landscape plan to show the location of
backflow preventers and all utilities associated with the proposed building. Conflicts exist
between the landscaping and the proposed water line and sanitary sewer. Prior to P&Z,
the applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to eliminate all conflicts.
The landscape plans have been modified to shift the oak tree to avoid the conflict with the
proposed sanitary sewer line.
7. Conditionally Satisfied.
8. Conditionally Satisfied.
9. Satisfied.
10. Not Satisfied; accordance with Section 78-3 19 of the LDR, a landscape buffer shall be
a minimum of eight feet in depth around the perimeter of a parcel. Also, the maximum
spacing of trees along any perimeter buffer shall be 60 feet. Please update the landscape plan
to increase the amount of plant material and number of trees in the perimeter buffers. As the
current application for a major conditional use, the entire site is open for review. Prior
to the scheduling of P&Z, the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide, at
a minimum, one tree every 60 feet within the required perimeter buffers.
0
Due to conflicts between the overheadpowerlines, and the detention area on the southern
perimeter, the previously approvedplans incorporated additional plant material and trees
into the site as part of an alternative landscape design when the project was originally
approved. With this submission, the attached landscape plans have, however, been further
amended to include additional trees along the eastern, northern and western perimeters of
the site. In addition, the streetscape planting has been amended to include 4 additional
Triple Christmas Palms in the roadshoulder which will blend with the shoulder landscaping
to compliment the existing Temple landscape design.
11. Satisfied.
12. Withdrawn.
13. Satisfied.
G Uobs\Temple ludea\CU Amendment 2M)SApplication InfolStalTand LBFH Response Ltr 082506 wpd
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
August 25,2006
Page 3
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
In accordance with Section 78-319 of the LDR, stormwater detention and retention
areas are prohibited within landscape buffers. Prior to the scheduling of P&Z, the
applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to remove the detention area
from the required perimeter landscape buffer.
The attached plans have been amended to remove the proposed retention area from the
buffer.
Prior to the scheduling of P&Z, the applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape
plan to show the correct conflguration of the two grass parking spaces located east of
the existing dumpster. The existing configuration does not match what is shown on the
site plan or landscape plan.
All of the attachedplans have been amended to reflect the correct configuration of the
existing grass parking spaces located east of the dumpster.
Prior to the scheduling of P&Z, the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to provide
a separate plant list for the material proposed for the road shoulder. Material installed
off-site shall not count toward meeting the required landscape points for the site.
Attachedplease find an amended Streetscape Landscape Plan for the road shoulder. This
plan has been amended to include the additional trees in the shoulder and to reflect that the
median planting has been designed and installed by others. Neither the plant material or
the points for the shoulder planting have been included in the overall plant list for the site.
The plant materialproposed for the roadshoulder is identified separately on the Streetscape
plan.
Prior to the scheduling of P&Z, the applicant shall revises the proposed landscape plan
for the beautification of the road shoulder along Hood Road to include the addition of
trees and/or palms.
Attachedpleasefind an amendedstreetscape Plan for the roadshoulder. This plan has been
amended to include Triple Christmas Palms which will compliment the existing landscaping
at thefiont facade of the Temple.
In accordance with Section 78-181 of the LDR, air conditioning compressors or other
equipment designed to serve the principal structure shall be screened from view of
adjoining properties. I anticipate a Condition of Approval which would require the
applicant to screen the mechanical equipment located on the roof of the existing
building, visible on the north elevation, from view of the adjoining property.
G Vobs\Templc ludea\CU Amendment 200S\Application Info\StafFand LBFH Response Ltr 082506 wpd
f ‘~ . Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
August 25,2006
Page 4 0
It is the applicant’s understanding that the treatment of the roof top equipment was resolved
at the time of the construction of the Temple sanctuary improvements and that this comment
has been withdrawn.
19. In accordance with Section 78-329 of the LDR, irrigation systems shall be designed and
maintained to eliminate staining of buildings, walks, walls and other site improvements
including landscaping. I anticipate a Condition of Approval which would require the
applicant to install rust preventative equipment on the irrigation system for the entire
site.
A note has been added to the Landscape Plans stating that a rust preventative system will
be installed on the existing irrigation system.
COMMENTS FROM BRUCE GREGG, SUA, DATED APRIL 17,2006
1. Th applicant needs to submit a property questionnaire to Seacoast as soon as possible.
It is the applicants understanding that the property questionnaire was submitted and that
SUA has issued a letter of Service Availability. A copy of the Service Availability letter has
been e-mailed to Mr. Gregg for hisfiles.
2. The applicant needs to revise the landscape plans to relocate the existing live oak tree
away from the proposed sanitary sewer service.
The attached landscape plans have been modified to shift the oak tree to avoid the conflict
with the sanitary sewer line.
COMMENTS FROM JUDY DYE, LBFH, DATED APRIL 18,2006
Certified Comments
1. Satisfied.
2. Satisfied.
3. Not Satisfied. While the applicant clarified the site work proposed under this project,
showing the existing work to remain either “shaded” or “ghosted” on the site plan,
some proposed areas are not noted on the site plan. The proposed retention pond and
swale areshown “ghosted”, as are the three proposed grass parkingspaces and utilities.
The applicant shall revise the site plan to clearly identify all proposed work under this
project.
G.Uobs\Temple Judea\CU Amendment 2005\Application InfoStaITmd LBFH Response Ltr.082506 wpd
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
August 25,2006
Page 5
4.
5.
6.
7. 0 8.
9.
10.
The plans have been amend to correct the “sh
modijkation.
dedghosted” areas depicting the areas of
Not Satisfied. While the applicant provided a drainage statement, which is signed and
sealed by an engineer who is licensed in the state of Florida, to support their premise
that the increased impervious area will not additionally impact the site or abutting
parcels, in accordance with Section 78-80 of the LDR, the following is noted:
a. There appear to be typos in the drainage statement titled “Proposed Drainage
Improvements”, which refer to both a retention and detention basin for the
north project area. The engineering plan refers to this area as a detention pond;
however there is no control structure outfall. The applicant shall revise the text
and plan sheet for consistency.
Please see the attached amendedplans. The previous reference of Detention Pond has been
modified to read Retention Pond.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
Not Satisfied. The applicant shall provide an accessible access route from the building
to the public sidewalk in accordance with ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE
DESIGN Section 4.1.2 Accessible Sites and Exterior Facilities: New Construction. An
accessible site shall meet the following minimum requirements: (I’ At least one
accessible route complying with 4.3 shall beprovided within the boundary of the site from
public transportation stops, accessible parking spaces, passenger loading zones if
provided, and public streets or sidewalks, to an accessible building entrance. (See also
Florida Building Code Section 11-4.3.2) 6
While the applicant shows the limits of the accessible route to the porte-cochere, the
applicant shall show it, on the site plan and landscape plan, extended to the proposed
building by indicating accessibility for the north side of the drop off area. The
applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan for conformance with the
engineering plan and architectural plan which show the walk to be flush with the
pavement across the drop off area, the site plan and landscape plan currently show
Type “D” curb through this area.
The site and landscape plans have been amended to more clearly depict the transition from
Type “D”curb to the dropgush curb, on both sides of the entry walkway.
G Uobs\Temple ludea\CU Amendment 200SL4ppIicalion Ido\Staffand LBFH Response Ltr 082506 wpd
e
0
e
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
August 25,2006
Page 6
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
Not Satisfied. The applicant shall revise the width of the pavement on the site plan, at
the southeast corner of the proposed building, to conform to the minimum 24-foot wide
aisle as specified in Table 32 of Section 78-344 of the LDR The applicant currently
shows this area to be 22 feet wide.
Through subsequent communications with Ms. Dye, it is our understanding that this
comment is being withdrawn.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
Satisfied.
The applicant shall provide justification for the assumed Wet Season Water Table
Elevation as indicated on page 4 of the submitted Surface Water Management (SWM)
System Calculations.
Pleasejnd attachedfurtherjustijkation for the assumed Wet Season Water Table Elevation,
as indicated onpage 4 of the submittedsurface Water Management System Calculations and
the attachedpage from the NPBCID Unit 2 Permit. This portion of the Temple Judea site
flows into the Evergrene project which is permitted with a control elevation of 8.0 I, i
The applicant shall revise the Fill Needed for Building calculation as provided on page
10 of the submitted SWM System Calculations to indicate a finished floor elevation of
16.00 feet consistent with the Conceptual Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan and page
5 of the submitted SWM System Calculations.
The conceptual engineering plans have been amended accordingly. Please note the revised
Volumetric Storage Comparison attached.
G Wobs\Temple ludea\CU Amendment 200SL4pplicat1on Info\StatTand LBFH Response Ltr 082506 wpd
(‘ Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
August 25,2006
Page 7
30. The applicant shall clarify the Fill Needed for Building calculation as provided on page
10 of the submitted SWM System Calculations. It is not clear how the depth of fill was
determined.
The conceptual engineering plans have been amended accordingly. Please note the revised
Volumetric Storage Comparison attached.
31. The applicant shall revise the Fill Needed for Buildkg calculation as provided on page
10 of the submitted SWM System Calculations to include the fill required for the
additional driveway and sidewalk improvements associated with the proposed
classroom addition consistent with the Conceptual Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan.
The conceptual engineering plans have been amended to include the $11 required for the
additional driveway and sidewalk improvements as requested. Please note the revised
Volumetric Storage Comparison attached.
Non-Certified Comments
NOTE: All engineeringhfrastruuture plans are considered conceptual during the planning
and zoning review phase and are subject to further review during the final construction
review. These non-certification comments shall be satisfied prior to construction plan approval
and the issuance of the first land alteration permit.
0
Please note that previous Certification Issue #29 has been re-numbered Non-Certification Issue
#l.
1. Not Satisfied. The applicant indicated on tn’e plans the structural numbers (SN) for the
pavement section in accordance with Section 78-499 Table 41 of the LDR
a. The applicant shall revise the minor typo in the SN table. The asphalt layer
should be 1.25” x 0.44 = 0.55 SN, instead of the 0.56 shown. However, this does
not affect the acceptability of the pavement section, as it still exceeds the
required SN (1.5) as indicated in the LDR
The applicant shall clarify the note on the engineering plan (Sheet 4) under
RoadwayParking which indicates the SN should be 2.0.
b.
The conceptual engineeringplans have been amended to reflect the correction of the
noted typographical error, as well as the note on Sheet 4 “ Roadway/Parking” has been
amended for clarification, as requested.
G Uobs\Temple ludea\CU Amendment 2005L4pplication Info\Slaffand LBFH Response Lfr 082506 wpd
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
August 25,2006
Page 8
Conditions of Approval
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
“Applicant shall copy to the City all permit applications, permits, certifications and
approvals. )’ (City Engineer)
“Applicant shall provide all necessary construction zone signage and fencing as required by
the City Engineer. ” (City Engineer)
“Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit,
applicant shall provide cost estimates in accordance with LDR Section 78-309 and 78-461
and for on-site project improvements, not includinn public inji-astructure, or landscaping and
irrigation costs for review and approval by the City. The cost estimates shall be signed and
sealed by an engineer and landscape architect registered in the state of Florida and shall be
posted with the City, prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit. (City Engineer)
“The construction, operation andor maintenance of any elements of the subject project shall
not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage of surrounding areas. $ at any time
during the project development, it is determined by the City that any of the surrounding areas
are experiencing negative drainage impacts caused by the project, it shall be the applicant’s
responsibility to cure said impacts in aperiod of time and a manner acceptable to the City
prior to additional construction activities. ” (City Engineer)
“Prior to issuance of the first land alteration permit, applicant shall submit .
signedsealeddated construction plans dpaving/grading/drainage and waterhewer) and all
pertinent calculations for review and comment. (Ci6 Engineer)
“Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit,
applicant shall schedule a pre-permit meeting with City stafl ” (City Engineer)
“Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit the applicant shall provide to the
City letters of authorization from the applicable utility companies allowing landscaping and
light poles to be placed within the utility easements. (City Engineer)
“Applicant shall notifi the City’s Public Works Division at least 10 working days prior to the
commencement of any worWconstruction activity within any public right-of-way within the
City of Palm Beach Gardens. In the case of a city right-of-way, the applicant has at least five
G Vobs\Temple JudeaKU Amendment 2005L4ppl1cal1on Info\Staffand LBFH Response Ltr.082506 wpd
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
August 25,2006
Page 9
working days to obtain a right-of-way permit. Right-of-way permits may be obtained at the
Building Division. Failure to comply with this condition could result in a Stop Work Order of
all worWconstruction activity within the public right-of-way and the subject development
site. ” (Public Works)
The applicant agrees to all the proposed conditions as set forth by the City’s consulting engineer.
Please note that with this submission, we have also included amended architectural plans, and
that the footprint of the proposed classroom building has been expanded. Taking Fire Code
occupancy limits into consideration, the interior of the building has been modified to more
effectively accommodate the students in each classroom.
Should you have any questions, or need any additional information, please feel free to contact
me. We look forward to being scheduled for consideration by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals
Board at the next available meeting.
Sinmly,
Principal
SP
Attachments > Site Plan, prepared by Urban Design Studio and dated August 25,2006
> Landscape Plans and Detail Sheet, prepared by Urban Design Studio and dated
August 25,2006
> Landscape Open Space Plan, prepared by Urban Design Studio and dated
August 25,2006
Streetscape Landscape Plan, prepared by Urban Design Studio and dated
August 25,2006
> Architectural Elevations and Floor Plan, prepared by Theodore E. Davis
Architect and Associates, and dated August 1 1 , 2006
Storm Water Management System Calculations, prepared by Keshavarz and
Associates and dated August 16,2006
> Exhibit SA of the NPBCID Unit 2 Permit
> Conceptual Engineering Plans(4 sheets), prepared by Keshavarz and
Associates and dated August 16,2006
>
> .
cc: Andrew Brock
Pat Lawson
G:Wobs\Temple ludea\CU Amendment 2M)S\Application Info\Sta8and LBFH Response Lir.082506 wpd
April 4, 2006
0 Mr. Michael Sanchez,
Senior Planner
urban
stu 10
City of Palm Beach Gardens
10500 N. Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
RE: TEMPLE JUDEA CLASSROOM EXPANSION
Urban Design
Urban Planning
Land Planning
Landscape Architecture
RESPONSE TO STAFF COMMENTS
UDS REF # 03-024.02 (CU)
Dear Mike:
In response to the comments received from you, Bruce Gregg of SUA, Ross Gilmore, PBG
Forestry Technician, and Judy Dye of LBFH, we offer the following responses. For your
convenience, I have duplicated the comments in bold and our responses follow in italics.
Comments from Michael J. Sanchez, Planniny Manager, Growth Manavement
Desartment, dated January 30,2006
1. Staff has visited the site and determined that the construction of the classroom
addition in the currently proposed location will require the removal of several
mature Slash Pine trees, under which there exists a shaded gathering area that adds
tremendously to the aesthetic qualities of the rear o the site. Staff suggests that the
building be moved to either the middle of the rear portion of the site or to the
northeast corner of the site. Staff’s suggested locations will (1) move the building
away from the rear yards of the homes to the west that “back-up” to the subject site
(the homes to the north and east are separated from the site by a road and do not
have rear yards facing the site; (2) preserve the mature slash Pine trees in the
northwest corner of the site; and (3) preserve the shaded gathering area on the
northwest corner of the site.
0
The applicant has taken the suggestions of the staffto heart and has analyzed the
possibility of moving the proposed location of the building. While all of staffcomments
have merit, after careful consideration and evaluation the applicant has concluded that
they feel the most appropriate location for theproposed building is in the current
proposed location. There were several factors that contributed to this conclusion,
including the following:
With the addition of the classroom building, the reduction ofpewious area
requires that an additional dry detention area beprovided. Because of the @Iw OF ’A~M BCH GDtS
location of the existing sanitary sewer line in the
center of the grass area, only those areas on the
northeast or northwest corners of theproperty are Suite 225 - The ~ofts at City Place
available for theplacement of the building orfor West Palm Beach, FL 33401
APR 07 2006
mNING 8( 20l\l/& DIV
477 s. Avenue
561.366.1100 561.366.1111 fax
C:\Documents and Settings\abooth\Desktop\Temple\Staff Response Ltr.032706.wpd www.UDSonline.com
LCC35
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
April 4,2006
- Page2
the dry detention. Placement of the building in either location will result
in the loss of trees. By placing the building on the northwest side, and the
dry detention on the northeast side, the picnic area can bepresewed.
b) By locating the building in the northwest corner of the site, it allows
several things to occur:
1) Trafic circulation into and out of the parking area from the drop-
oflareas are optimized for safe and convenient drop-offandpick-
up of the children.
Pedestrian access to and from the main sanctuary to the classroom
building is more convenient.
The classroom building can be monitored more easily by personnel
from the main facility.
The building will be more visible which, will allow signage on the
building to be seen. It is the intention of the Temple to name the
building after the major contributor and benefactor and visibility
of the sign is very important to the Temple and would be greatly
appreciated by the benefactor.
The size of the classrooms can be maintained. Ifthe building was
relocated to the northeast corner, the building would need to be
located closer to the residential property line and the classrooms
would need to be substantially reduced in size in order to avoid
conflicts with the existing sanitary sewer line.
2)
3)
4)
5)
c) Concern for the abutting neighbors has been addressed by:
1) Designing the building so that the classrooms and windows are
oriented toward the north and south, awayfrom the western
property line.
Providing additional plant material (Oak trees) adjacent to the
western property line to further enhance the existing buffer.
Increasing the building setback from the western property line
from 36' to 50' which provides a 91 foot separation between the
building and the closest residential structure. Because the
building will be so in-frequently used, the applicant believes that
there will not be an impact to the abutting neighbors.
2)
3)
2. The applicant shall identify the mean height of the roof of the new building.
The notation of the mean height has been added to the attached architecturalplans.
C:\Documents and Settings\abooth\Desktop\Temple\Staff Response Ltr.032706.wpd
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
April 4,2006 0 Page3
3. The mechanical equipment of the exiting Temple Judea building shall be screened
in accordance with the City’s LDRs.
The applicant would like clarification of what mechanical equipment has not been
properly screened. It is their intent to meet the provisions of the code and it was their
understanding that all equipment had been properly screened.
4. The applicant shall label the location of the mechanical equipment for the classroom
addition.
The attached site plan has noted the location of the mechanical equipment.
5. The applicant shall provide documentation demonstrating that the proposed
expansion of the Conditional Use is consistent with the Condition Use Criteria found
in Section 78-53 of the City’s LDRs.
Please see the attached Conditional Use Analysis which addresses consistency with the
I code.
6. The project narrative states that the expansion will be construed in phases. The.
applicant shall provide development plans (site plan, landscape, and elevations)
depicting how the project will look and function subsequeit to the first phase of
construction.
Comments from Bruce Gregg, SUA, dated January 12,2006 .
1. The applicant needs to submit a property questionnaire to Seacoast.
The applicant has submitted the requested property questionnaire and has received from
Seacoast Utility Authority a letter of Service Availability for this site. Please see attached.
The applicant needs to make a water and sewer submittal to Seacoast. ’
I t
2.
Attached are conceptual engineeringplans which include water andsewerplans. Theseplans
will also be submitted under separate cover directly to SUA for review and approval aspart
of the SUAlpermitting process.
,
C:\Documents and Settings\abooth\Desktop\Temple\Staff Response Ltr.032706.wpd
*
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
Aprii 4,2006 0 Page4
Comments from Ross Gilmore, Forestry Technician, dated March 7.2006
1. In accordance with Section 78-313 of the LDR, a minimum of 75 percent of the plant
material proposed shall be from the City’s Preferred Species List for each of the
following categories: trees, palms, shrubs, and ground covers. Please revise the landscape
plan to show this requirement has been met for the entire site. I can provide assistance
if needed.
The attached landscape plans have been amended th update the list of plant materials
proposed for the classroom addition to indicate that the proposedplant materials meet the
requiredpercentages ofPreferred Species. Theplans have also been amended to include the
list of the existing plant material previously approved.
2. Table 27 on page CD78:252 of the LDR shows the points allowed by code for trees,
palms, shrubs, ground covers, and grass. In order to justify points assigned to palms,
please revise the plant legend to reflect the amount of clear wood on palms in addition
to overall height.
The attachedplans have been amended to indicate the CT height for the palms.
3. In accordance with Section 78-314 of the LDR, developments within residential districts
are required to provide minimum landscape points based on the amount of open space
provided as depicted in Table 28. The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to show
5575.7 points as required for the entire site.
The attachedplans have been amended to reflect requiredpoints of 561 9.24 and provided
points of 6775.3. The calculation of requiredpoints was made as follows: 43% open space
in a Residential District requires 1 Opointsper 100 SF. (43%=S6192.4 /I 00 X 10 = 561 9.24).
Please note that the points provided exceed the points required.
4. In accordance with Section 78-313 of the LDR, not more than 40 percent of the total
landscape area shall be covered by sod or grass. Projects proposing playgrounds, ball
fields, dry detention areas or similar uses may subtract the open space square footage
of these grassy areas from the landscape area calculation for a corrected total. Please
provide documentation showing this requirement has been met.
Pleasejnd attached a graphic plan showing the percentage calculations of landscape areas
to sod ratio for the entire site as well as the total calculation for open space on this site. The
applicant meets the standards as set forth in Section 78-31 3 and does not exceed the 40% sod
requirement.
C:Documents and Settings\abooth\Desktop\Temple\Staff Response Ltr.032706.wpd
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Ternde Judea Classroom Exuansion
Apiii 4,2006
Page 5
5.
6.
7.
8.
In accordance with Section 78-320(a) (4) c. of the LDR, nonresidential buildings shall
have at least one shade tree or palm cluster installed for each 30 linear feet, or fraction
thereof, of faqade width. Trees and palms shall be of an installed size relating to the
height of the adjacent wall or facade, as indicated in Table 30. Please revise the
landscape plan surrounding the proposed building accordingly.
The attached landscapeplan has been amended to include additional trees along the facade
of the building. To meet the requirements of this section, the plan has provided for a cluster
of Sabal Palms at each corner, and an Oak tree and clusters of Christmas Palms along the
side, front and rear facades.
In accordance with Section 78-306 of the LDR, all existing and proposed utilities,
easements, and light fixtures shall be shown on the landscape plan to prevent possible
conflicts with the installation of landscaping. The landscape plan will need to take these
locations into consideration and be designed to prevent changes to the plan after City
Council approval. Please revise the site plan and landscape plan to show the location of
backflow preventers and all utilities associated with the proposed building.
The attachedplans have been amended to clarifL the locations of the existing andproposed
utilities, easements and lightjxtures. The landscape design has been adjusted accordingly.
In accordance with Section 78-330 of the LDR, the applicant shall erect and maintain
protective barriers around the drip line of existing trees adjacent to proposed
improvements. All work shall be inspected and approved by the Landscape Architect
of Record and the City Forester. Please revise the landscape plan to indicate the type of
protective barrier to be used.
The attachedplans have been amended to include a Mirasafe barrier fence detail.
In accordance with Section 78-329 of the LDR, landscaping removed due to its death,
disease, damage or insect-infestation shall be replaced to conform to the approved
landscape plan. Please check the previously approved landscape plan for the property
and ensure that all approved landscaping is present and in good health.
The Landscape Architect of Record has performed an on-site visit to review the current
condition ofplant material at the Temple Judea site. It has been determined that the Black
Olive tree, located at the northern mostparking island of the western parking area has been
damaged and should be replaced. The attached plan reflects a change of species for the
replacement to an Oak. The applicant would like to request that this tree be allowed to be
replaced at the time of the installation of the proposed landscaping for the classroom
addition.
C:\Documents and Settings\abooth\Desktop\Temple\Staff Response Ltr.032706.wpd
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
In accordance with Section 78-329 of the LDR, all landscape areas shall include an
automatic irrigation system providing 100 percent coverage and equipped with a rain
sensor/cut-off switch. Please add a note to the landscape plan indicating the installation
of an irrigation system meeting these requirements.
The attached landicape plans have been amended to include a notation that all landscape
areas will be 100% irrigated and a detail of the rain sensor has been added.
In accordance with Section 78-319 of the LDR, a landscape buffer shall be a minimum
of eight feet in depth around the perimeter of a parcel. Also, the maximum spacing of
trees along any perimeter buffer shall be 60 feet. Please update the landscape plan to
increase the amount of plant material and number of trees in the perimeter buffers.
The attachedplans have been amended to cIariJL the existing conditions versus the proposed
improvements. The southern, eastern and western perimeter buffer configurations are
existing, in accordance with the most recent site plan approval, and are not proposed for
modijcation aspart of this application. Aspart of the proposed mod8cation to the site plan,
additional Oak trees have been added to the landscape plan around the northwestern,
northern and northeastern boundaries of the grassed area to supplement the existing pine
trees and cocoplum hedge. The location of the proposed Oak trees, along with the existing
Pine trees, meets and exceeds the spacing requirements in the code.
The applicant shall revise the landscape plan to remove the approval date from the root
barrier details, as City Council has not approved these drawings.
The attachedplans have been amended to remove the date from the root barrier details, as
requested.
The applicant shall revise the site plan and landscape plan to shift the location of the
proposed building to the east. Centrally locating the building along the north boundary
line will allow the preservation of several existing pine trees and lessen the impact on
surrounding home owners.
Please see the response to comment 1 of the commentsfrom Michael Sanchez.
The applicant shall provide a tree survey for the area between the north property line
and the existing pavement.
The landscape plan reflects the locations of the existing trees in a lighter tone and the
proposed trees in a darker tone. Please note that the proposed site plan also reflects the
C:\Documents and Settings\abooth\Desktop\Temple\Staff Response Ltr.032706. wpd
Ivlr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
locations of the six trees which must be removed for the construction of the proposed
classroom building and the dry retention area. The proposed landscape plan is providing
new trees at a ratio of more than 5:l to the trees that must be removed for the construction
of the building.
Comments from Scott Fetterman, PBG Fire Department, dated January 12,2006
1.
2.
3. e
4.
What are the ages of the children that will be occupying the classrooms?
Temple Judea offers religious classes to children between the ages of 5 through 13 years old.
How often will the classrooms be used?
Classes are currently offered by Temple Judea two (2) days per week, Wednesday 4:OO-
6:OOpm and on Sundays from 9:30am until 12:OOpm. Classes are not given during the
summer months.
Will the building be used as a day-care, pre-school, primary or secondary school?
No. The proposed facility is for religion classes only.
Will the building be protected with fire sprinklers?
No, the building is proposed as a one-story Type 3B building and, as such, it is our
understanding that fire sprinklers are not required.
Comments from Judy Dye, LBFH, dated February 06,2006
Certified Comments
1. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall provide a traffic management plan for the drop off area
of the new building. We have concerns with having two lanes at the drop off requiring that
the student, who is dropped off in the outside lane has to walk in front of the car in the
inside (closest to the building) lane.
The site plan has been modified to re-design the drop-offarea and reduce the number of lanes.
The proposed plan currently has one lane, going in one direction, therefore, the conflict of
pedestrian trasJic has been relieved.
C:\Documents and Settings\abooth\Desktop\Temple\Staff Response Ltr.032706.wpd
i
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
t:;r;,2006
2. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall provide preliminary engineering plans for the project,
which are signed and sealed by an engineer who is licensed in the state of Florida.
Please find attached nine (9) signed and sealed copies of the conceptual engineering plans for
the Temple Judea Classroom Addition.
3. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall clarify the site work proposed under this project,
showing the existing work to remain either “shaded” or “ghosted” on the site plan. Where
work outside the boundaries of the proposed structure is to be altered, the applicant shall
clearly indicate same in accordance with Section 78-46 of the LDR.
The attachedplans have been amended to “ghost” out the existing site and bold the proposed
modijkations.
4. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall provide a drainage statement, which is signed and sealed
by an engineer who is licensed in the state of Florida, to support their premise that the
increased impervious area will not additionally impact the site or abutting parcels, in
accordance with Section 78-80 of the LDR.
Pleasefind attached nine (9) copies of the drainage statement for the Temple Judea Classroom
Addition.
5. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall provide an existing, required and proposed level of
parking, for each use within the entire complex of the main building and the proposed
addition, complying with Table 33 of Section 78-345 of the LDR.
The parking required and provided is consistent with the most recent site plan approval and is
being provided in accordance with the category of “Churches and Places of Worship” which
requires “1 space per 3 seats plus 1 space per 250 square feet of ofice plus requiredparking
for additional use (child or adult day care, elementary or secondary school, etc.) ”
The proposed classroom building is an expansion of a use that currently exists within the
synagogue. The religious classes are for members of the Temple only. The proposed building
does not increase the number ofseats, or ofjce space, and will not be used for daycare, regular
school uses or any other use that would trigger the need for additionalparking.
Parking required is calculated as follows:
211 seats @ 1 spper 3 seats = 71 spaces
931 sf ofice @ 1 sp per 250 sf = 4 spaces
Total required = 75
Total provided = 82 (77paved and 5 grass)
C:\Documents and Settings\abooth\Desktop\Temple\Staff Response Ltr.032706.wpd
i
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
Aprii 4,2006
Page9
6. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall also modify the handicap and bicycle parking
requirements, as required, based on the above.
Based on the above response, there are no additional impacts or requirements for handicap
and/or bicycle parking on this site. Temple Judea has, however, provided addition bicycle
parking at the front of the proposed classroom addition for the convenience of it’s members.
7. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall label and dimension all existing and proposed walks in
accordance with Section 78-46 of the LDR.
The attached plans have been amended to include labels and dimensions for all existing and
proposed walks in accordance with Section 78-46.
’ 8. Not Satisfied. The landscape plan appears to show a sidewalk along the south side of the
proposed building, which is not shown on the site plan. The applicant shall revise the plans
in accordance with Section 78-46 of the LDR.
The plans have been amended to clarifjl the intent of the design. The sidewalk access to the
classroom building will be at the point of entry under the porte-cochere. The area along the
south side of the building will be landscaping and sod.
9. Not Satisfied. The architectural plan shows the minimum width of the above walk, on the
south side of the new addition, to be less than five (5’) feet. The applicant shall modify the
plans to conform to Section 78-230 of the LDR which specifies the minimum width of the
sidewalk shall be five (5’) feet.
The plans have been amended to clarifjl that there will not be a sidewalkprovided on the south
side of the building.
10. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall provide an accessible access route from the building
to the public sidewalk in accordance with ADA STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE
DESIGN Section 4.1.2 Accessible Sites and Exterior Facilities: New Construction. An
accessible site shall meet the following minimum requirements: (I) At least one
accessible route complying with 4.3 shall beprovided within the boundary of the site from
public transportation stops, accessible parking spaces, passenger loading zones if
provided, and public streets or sidewalks, to an accessible building entrance. (See also
Florida Building Code Section 11-4.3.2) While the applicant shows the limits of the
accessible route for the existing area, the applicant shall show it extended to the
proposed building by identifying all proposed handicap ramps.
r
C:\Documents and Settings\abooth\Desktop\Temple\Staff Response Ltr.032706.wpd
/- i.
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
April 4,2006
Theplans have been amended to show the connection to the handicap access route from the
proposed building to the main structure and back out to the Hood Road.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Not Satisfied. The applicant shall label, on the site plan, all proposed and existing curb
ramps as “CR” in accordance with Section 78-46 of the LDR.
The attachedplans have been amended to clearly reflect the labeling of all proposed and
existing curb ramps as “CR”.
Not Satisfied. It is recommended that the applicant remove the CR numbers from the
site plan, as the numbers shown do not conform to the FDOT Index 304 CR numbers.
The attachedplans have been amended to remove the referenced “CR ” numbers. FDOT
index 304 “CR ” numbers have been provided on the engineering plans being submitted.
Not Satisfied. The applicant shall provide a note on the site plan stating, “All handicap
accessible ramps shall meet all applicable local, regional, state, and federal accessibility
guidelines and regulations. Any modijkations shall be approved by the engineer-of-
record
The attachedplans have been amended to include a note stating, “All handicap accessible
ramps shall meet all applicable local, regional, state, and federal accessibility guidelines
and regulations. Any modifications shall be approved by the engineer-of-record. ‘I, as
requested.
Not Satisfied. The applicant shows “proposed” Type “D” curb within the existing
parking lot on the site plan, for the planting diamonds. The applicant shall clarify
existing vs. proposed curb throughout the site, in accordance with Section 78-46 of the
LDR.
The attached plans have been amended to remove the references to the proposed
improvements which have been completed as part of the last site plan approval (‘ghosted).
The proposed improvements are intended to reflect only those modifications that are apart
of the current request (bold).
C:\Documents and Settings\abooth\Desktop\Temple\Staff Response Ltr.032706.wpd
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
April 4,2006
Page 11
15. Not Satisfied. The applicant indicates that the existing Type “D” curb is to be removed
or replaced as needed. The applicant shall clarify the intent of this note, in accordance
with Section 78-46 of the LDR.
The attachedplans have been amended to remove this note.
16. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall label the type of curb proposed for the porte-cochere
area in front of the school building on the site plan, in accordance with Section 78-46
of the LDR.
The attachedplans have been amended to reject the proposed curbing.
17. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall clarify the label on the site plan, near the southeast
corner of the proposed building, which indicates ‘8” curb’, or provide a detail for the .
‘8” curb’ in accordance with Section 78-46 of the LDR.
The attachedplans have been amended to read “D” Curb.
0 18. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall revise the width of the pavement on the site plan, at
the southeast corner of the proposed building, to conform to the phimum 24’ wide
aisle as specified in Table 32 of Section 78-344 of the LDR. The applicant currently
shows this area to be about 21.5’ wide.
1
The attached plans have been amended to relocate the 3 grass parking spaces which were
in conflict with the width of the drive aisle to the east and north of the driveway.
19. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall label the utility shown west of and parallel to the
sewer line on the site plan, at the rear of the existing building, in accordance with
Section 78-46 of the LDR.
The attachedplans have been amended to correct the location of the sewer line. The
previous plans showed two lines in error.
Not Satisfied. The applicant shall show and label the proposed utility locations on the
site plan for the new addition, including but not limited to the sewer and water service
locations, in accordance with Section 78-46 of the LDR.
20.
The attached plans have been amended to include all existing and proposed utilities,
easements, and light fixtures.
C:\Documents and Settings\abooth\Desktop\Temple\Staff Response Ltr.032706.wpd
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
April 4,2006
1 Page 12
21.
22.
23.
0
24.
25.
26.
Not Satisfied. The applicant shall clarify the intent of the crosshatching on the site plan
shown within the pavement area north of the dumpster, which is not shown on the
approved site plan, in accordance with Section 78-46 of the LDR.
The cross hatching in question has been removed. It was shown in error.
Not Satisfied. The applicant shall provide “One Way” and “DO Not Enter” signs, for
north and west bound traffic within the westernmost parking lot, at the exit from the
porte-cochere drive in accordance with Section 78-46 of the LDR.
The attached plans have been amended to reduce the number of lanes under the porte-
cochere, and the appropriate signage has been added at the exit.
Not Satisfied. We recommend providing a “Stop Sign/Stop Bar” and “Left Lane -Left
Turn Only” sign for the exit of the porte-cochere drive, due to two way traffic within
the parking lot, to the east and the south of the exit, in accordance with Section 78-46
of the LDR.
The attachedplans have been amended to include the stop sign and stop bar notation.
Not Satisfied. We recommend providing “Pedestrian Crossing” signs (Wll-2) with
arrows (W16-7p) for the east/west crosswalk from the main building to the proposed
addition in accordance with Section 78-46 of the LDR.
The attached plans have been amended to include notation for the appropriate pedestrian
signage, as requested, at thepoint ofpedestrian crossing, to advise on-corning tra@c of the
proposed crossing.
Not Satisfied. The depth of the northernmost parking stall in the west row of parking,
as measured along its north line, is substandard as shown. The applicant shall modify
the location of the exit curb, of the porte-cochere drive, so that the parking stall is in
accordance with Section 78-344 of the LDR.
The attachedplans have been amended to extend the length of the landscape island adjacent
to the lastparking space.
Not Satisfied. The applicant is proposing to modify the light pole located south of the
proposed porte-cochere area from a single headarm combination to a double head/arm
combination. The applicant shall revise the Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Engineering
Plan to identify the proposed double head/arm combination.
The attachedplans have been amended as requested.
C:\Documents and Settings\abooth\Desktop\Temple\Staff Response Ltr.032706.wpd
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
Layer Materia LBRlFBV Thicknes FDOT Coefficient
1 S
Aprii 4,2006
Page 13
SN
27. Satisfied.
Non-Certified Comments
NOTE: All engineeringhfrastructure plans are considered conceptual during the planning
and zoning review phase and are subject to further review during the final construction
review. These non-certification comments shall be satisfied prior to construction plan approval
and the issuance of the first land alteration permit.
28. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall indicate on the plans the structural numbers for the
pavement section in accordance with Section 78-499 Table 41 of the LDR. The
applicant shall provide a Pavement Section Table listing the material, LBWFBV,
material thickness, FDOT layer coefficient, and SN for the pavement section, base
section, and subgrade section, the total SN for the total pavement section and the
required SN, in accordance with Section 78-499, Table 41 of the LDR. (See 2005 FDOT
FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT DESIGN MANUAL Table 5.4 for Layer Coefficients)
Please see the attached conceptual engineering plans prepared by Keshavarz and
Associates. These plans have been prepared in accordance with the Section 78-499.
Conditions of Approval
1. “Applicant shall copy to the City allpermit applications, permits, certijkations and approvals. ”
(City Engineer)
2. “Applicant shallprovide all necessary construction zone signage and fencing as required by the
City Engineer. ” (City Engineer)
3. “Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit
applicant shall provide a cost estimate for the project, including public infrastructure and all
landscaping and irrigation costs for review andapproval by the City in order to establish surety.
The cost estimate shall be signed and sealed by an engineer and landscape architect registered a
C:\Documents and Settings\abooth\Desktop\Temple\Staff Response Lb.032706.wpd
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
April 4,2006 ‘0 Page 14
in the state of Florida. Surety will be based on 110% of the total combined approved cost .
estimates and shall be posted with the City, prior to the issuance of the first building permit.-In
accordance with Section 78-309 & 78-461 of the LDR. ” (City Engineer) .
4.
5.
6.
“Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit,
applicant shallprovide a cost estimate for the on-siteproject improvements, not includingpublic
infrastructure, or landscaping and irrigation costs for review and approval by the City. The cost
estimate shall be signed and sealed by an engineer registered in the state of Florida and shall
be posted with the City prior to the issuance of thefirst land alteration permit. ” (City Engineer)
“The construction, operation andlor maintenance of any elements of the subject project shall
not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage of surrounding areas. IJ at any time
during the project development, it is determined by the City that any of the surrounding areas .
are experiencing negative drainage impacts caused by the project, it shall be the applicant’s
responsibility to cure said impacts in a period of time and a manner acceptable to the City prior
to additional construction activities. ” (City Engineer)
“Applicant shall comply with all Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and State of
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) - National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (IVPDES) permit requirements, including but not limited to, preparation of
a stormwater pollution prevention plan and identification of appropriate Best Management
Practices, as generally accepted by the EPA and/or local regulatory agencies, for construction
activities, submission of a Notice of Intent to EPA or their designee, implementation of the
approved plans, inspection and maintenance of controls during construction, and submission
of a Notice of Termination. ” (City Engineer)
.
7. “Prior to issuance of theJrst land alteration permit, applicant shall submit signedhealedldated
construction plans @aving/gradingldrainage and waterhewer) and all pertinent calculations
for review and comment. (City Engineer)
8. “Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the jrst land alteration permit,
applicant shall schedule a pre-permit meeting with City stag” (City Engineer)
9. “Prior to the issuance of thejrst land alteration permit the applicant shallprovide to the City
letters of authorization from the applicable utility companies allowing landscaping and light
poles to be placed within the utility easements. ” (City Engineer)
The applicant agrees to all the proposed conditions as set forth by the City’s consulting engineer. We
hope that these responses and attached plans can be certified and we can be scheduled for the next
available Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board meeting.
C:\Documents and Settings\abooth\Desktop\Temple\Staff Response Ltr.032706.wpd
Mr. Michael Sanchez
Temple Judea Classroom Expansion
April 4,2006 0 Page 15
<*
Should you have any questions, or need any additional information, please feel free to contact me.
Sincmy,
Pr inc ip a1
Attachments . Site Plan, prepared by Urban Design Studio and dated April 7,2006 .
Landscape Plan and Detail Sheet, prepared by Urban Design Studio and dated April 7,
Landscape Open Space Plan, prepared by Urban Design Studio and dated April 7,2006
Architectural Elevations and Floor Plan, prepared by Theodore E. Davis Architect and
Storm Water Management System Calculations, prepared by Keshavarz and Associates
Conceptual Engineering Plans(4 sheets), prepared by Keshavarz and Associates and dated
.
2006 . .
Associates, and dated March 3 1,2006
Site Photometric Plans prepared by SJ Bramley, Inc. and dated March 3 1,2006
and dated February 13,2006
March 3 1,2006
. 0.
.
cc: Andrew Brock
.? Pat Lawson
C:\Documents and Settings\abooth\Desktop\Temple\Staff Response Ltr.032706.wpd
I ..
MEMORANDUM
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS,
SURVEYORS &MAPPERS
CIVIL
TRANSPORTATION
SURVEY & MAPPING
‘ GIS
“Partners For Results
Value By Design”
3550 S.W. Comorate Pkwv.
Palm C&, FL 349jO
(772) 286-3883
Fax (772) 286-3925
www.lbfh.com
TO: Jackie Holloman
FROM: Judy A. T. Dye
DATE: September 20,2006
+.
FILE NO. 06-4457
SUBJECT: Temple Judea - Classroom Expansion
CUMJ-06-01-000001
I
We have reviewed the following plans and information received September 1,
2006, for the referenced project:
Response to our prior comments of September 13,2006 prepared by Keshavarz
& Associates, Inc.
0 Revised Volumetric Storage Comparison prepared by Keshavarz & Associates,
InC.
We have the following comments:
Certification Issues
Comments 1 & 29 Previously Satisfied.
30. Satisfied. The applicant clarified the storage lost for proposed site plan
calculation as provided on page 10 of the submitted SWM System Calculations.
Comment 31 Previously Satisfied.
Non-Certification Issues
NOTE: All engineeringhnfrastructure plans are considered conceptual during
the planning and zoning review phase and are subject to further review during
the final construction review. These non-certification comments shall be
satisfied prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land alteration permit. I
I
1% Comment ‘1 Previously Satisfied.
2. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall revise the signing and marking notes (Sheet 2
of 4) as the text is cut off along the right margin.
3. Not Satisfied. The applicant shall provide a detail of the required truncated
dome for the curb ramps conforming”t0 FDOT Index 304 or remove the non
modified curb ramp details (Sheet 4 oft4) and reference the FDOT Index 304.
C:Documents and Settings\jholloman\Lcal Settings\Temporary Internet FiIes\OLK28W457i.doc
I
Temple Judea - Classroom Expansion
LBFH File No. 05-4457
Page 2 of 3
4.
5.
6.
7.
Not Satisfied. The applicant shall provide a detail of the spreader swale, as
noted (Sheet 1 of 4). If it is intended that Section “A-A” is the spreader swale, it
shall be so labeled on the detail sheet (Sheet 4 of 4) and/or Section “A-A”
identified on the plan view (Sheet 1 of 4).
Not Satisfied. The applicant shall label the CR# for the curb ramp within the
porte-cochere, on the engineering plan.
Not Satisfied. We suggest that the applicant review and clarify the
proposedexisting elevations for the exit area (south end) of the porte-cochere
drive, as it appears a low point will be created in the area of the 13.93 elevation
near the intersection of the gutter line and the extension of the north curb. The
applicant shall clarify how this area will drain.
Not Satisfied. The applicant shall provide a note on the engineering plan,
consistent with the site plan, stating, “All handicap accessible ramps shall meet
all applicable local, regional, state, :and federal accessibility guidelines and
regulations. Any rnod8cations shall be approved by the engineer-of record. I’
Conditions of Approval
1. “Applicant shall copy to the City all permit applications, permits; certijkations
and approvals. ” (City Engineer)
2. “Applicant shall provide all necessary construction zone signage and fencing
as required by the City Engineer. ” (City Engineer)
3. “Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land
alteration permit, applicant shall provide cost estimates in accordance with
LDR Section 78-309 and 78-461 and for on-site project improvements, not
inchdin2 public infrastructure, or landscaping and irrigation costs for review
and approval by the City. The cost estimates shall be signed and sealed by an
engineer and landscape architect registered in the state of Florida and shall be
posted with the City, prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit.
(City Engineer)
4. “The construction, operation and/or maintenance of any elements of the subject
project shall not have any negativk impacts on the existing drainage of
surrounding areas. IJI at any time; during the project development, it is
determined by the City that any of the surrounding areas arekexperiencing
negative drainage impacts caused by the project, it shall be the applicant’s
responsibility to cure said impacts in a period of time and a manner acceptable
to the City prior to additional construction activities. ” (City Engineer)
‘ 5. “Prior to issuance of the first land alteration permit, applicant shall submit
signed/sealed/dated construction plans (paving/grading/drainage and water/
sewer) and all pertinent calculations for review and comment. (City Engineer)
C:\Documents and Settings\jholloman\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK28W457i.doc
Temple Judea - Classroom Expansion
LBFH File No. 05-4457
Page 3 of 3
6. “Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land
alteration permit, applicant shall schedule a pre-permit meeting with City
stafJ: ” (City Engineer)
7. “Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit the applicant shall
provide to the City, letters of authorization from the applicable utility
companies allowing landscaping and light poles to be placed within the utility
easements. ” (City Engineer) I
8. “Applicant shall notijj the City’s Public Works Division at least IO working
days prior to the commencement of any worWconstruction activity within any
public right-of-way within the City of Palm Beach Gardens. In the case of a city
right-of-way, the applicant has at least five working days to obtain a right-of-
way permit. Right-of-way permits may be obtained at the Building Division.
Failure to comply with this condition‘could result in a Stop Work Order of all
worldconstruction activity within th,e public right-of-way and the subject
development site. ” (Public Works) ,
The applicant shall provide a written; response to all comments, indicating
acknowledgement of each comment , and how each comment has been
addressed. Compliance will expedite the subsequent review.
The applicant is reminded that all submittals are to be made to the City of
Palm Beach Gardens Growth Management Department.
JATD/mef
cc: Michael Sanchez - Palm Beach Gardens (msanchez@,pbgfl.com)
Anne Booth - Urban Design Studio (ABooth0udsonline.com)
Pat Lawson - Keshavarz & Associates (pat0keshavarz.com)
Robert Canterbury - Keshavarz & Associates (robert@,keshavarz.com)
C:\Documents and Settings‘jholloman\local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK28\4457i,doc
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS,
SURVEYORS & MAPPERS
CIVIL
TRANSPORTATION
SURVEY & MAPPING
GIS
“Partners For Results
Value By Design”
3550 S.W. Corporate Pkwy.
Palm City, FL 34990 0 (772) 286-3883
Fax (772) 286-3925
www.lbfh.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: Jackie Holloman
FROM: Judy A. T. Dye
DATE: September 13,2006
FILE NO. 06-4457
SUBJECT: Temple Judea - Classroom Expansion
CUMJ-06-01-000001
We have reviewed the following plans and information received September 1,
2006, for the referenced project:
Response to our prior comments of April 18, 2006 prepared by Urban Design
Studio
Site Plan (Sheet 1 through 4 of 4)prepared by Urban Design Studio
Streetscape Landscape Plan (Sheet 1 of 1) prepared by Urban Design Studio
Landscape Openspace Plan (Sheet 1 of 1) prepared by Urban Design Studio
Architectural Plan (Sheet A-1 through' A-4) dated August 11,2006 prepared by
Theodore E. Davis Architect and Asso’ciates, P.A.
Conceptual Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan (Sheet 1 through 4 of 4)
prepared by Keshavarz & Associates, Inc.
Storm Water Management Calculations dated August 16, 2006 prepared by
Keshavarz & Associates, Inc.
NPBCID Unit No. 2 Table 2.5-1 Existing and Future Development (Exhibit
,.
- -84
We have the following comments:
Certification Issues
Comments 1 & 2 Previously Satisfied.
3. Satisfied. The applicant revised the site plan to cl
work under this project.
arly identify-all propos 1 .
4. Satisfied. The applicant provided a drainage statement, which is signed and
sealed by an engineer who is licensed. in the state of Florida, to support their
premise that the increased impervious larea will not additionally impact the site
or abutting parcels, in accordance with,Section 78-80 of the LDR.
a. Satisfied. The applicant revised the text and plan sheet for consistency.
Comment 5 to 9 Previously Satisfied.
\\pbgsfile\GTowth_Management\Planning_and-Zoning\jholloman\CASE FILES\TEMPLE JUDEA\LBFH comments 9 13
06.doc
Temple Judea-- Classroom Expansion
LBFH File No. 05-4457 Page 2 of 4
10. Satisfied. The applicant revised the plan to provide an accessible access route
from the building to the public sidewalk in accordance with ADA
STANDARDS FOR ACCESSIBLE DESIGN Section 4.1.2 Accessible Sites
and Exterior Facilities: New Construction.
Comment 11 to 17 Previously Satisfied.
18. Satisfied. The applicant clarified the need for the revised pavement width of 22
feet, at the southeast comer of the proposed building.
Comment 19 to 27 Previously Satisfied.
28. Satisfied. The applicant provided additional justification for the assumed Wet
Season Water Table Elevation as indicated on page 4 of the submitted Surface
Water Management (SWM) System Calculations in the form of the NPBClD
Unit No: 2 Table 2.5-1 Existing and Future Development (Exhibit 8A) which
shows that the Evergrene development has a permitted control elevation of 8.0.
.
29. Satisfied. The applicant has revised the SWM System - Calculations to
consistently indicate a finished floor elevation of 16.00 feet.
30. Not Satisfied.‘The applicant shall clarify the storage lost for proposed site plan
calculation as provided on page 10 of the submitted SWM System Calculations.
It is not clear how the volume lost wasidetemined.
3 1. Satisfied. The applicant has revised the SWM System Calculations to include
the fill required for the additional driveway ’and sidewalk improvements
associated with the’proposed classroom addition consistent with the Conceptual
Paving, Grading and Drainage Plan. These elements are included under the
heading “1 5’ Contour”.
Non-Certification Issues‘
NOTE: All engineering/infrastructure plans are considered conceptual during
the planning and zoning review‘phase and are subject to further review during
the final construction review. These hon-certification comments shall be
satisfied prior to construction plan approval and tlie issuance of the first land
alteration permit.
Please note that previous Certification Issue #29 has been re-numbered Non-
Certification Issue #I. L‘
1. Satisfied. The applicant indicated on the plans the structural numbers (SN) for
the pavement section in accordance with Section 78-499 Table 41 of the LDR.
a. Satisfied. The applicant revised the minor typo in the SN table.
I
\\pbgsfile\Growth~ManagementVlann~ng~and~Zon~ng\~holloman\CASE FILES\TEMPLE JUDEA\LBFH comments 9 1 3
06.doc
*
Temple Judea - Classroom Expansion
LBFH File No. 05-4457
Page 3 of 4
b. Satisfied. The applicant clarified the note on the engineering plan (Sheet 4)
2. The applicant shall revise the signing and marking notes (Sheet 2 of 4) as the
text is cut off along the right margin.
3. The applicant shall provide a detail of the required truncated dome for the curb
ramps conforming to FDOT Index 304 or remove the non modified curb ramp
details (Sheet 4 of 4) and reference the FDOT Index 304.
under Roadway/Parking to indicate that the SN should be 1.5.
4. The applicant shall provide a detail of the spreader swale, as noted (Sheet 1 of
4). If it is intended that Section “A-A” is the spreader swale, it shall be so
labeled on the detail sheet (Sheet 4 of 4) and/or Section “A-A” identified on the
plan view (Sheet 1 of 4).
32. The applicant shall label the CR# for; the curb ramp within the porte-cochere,
on the engineering plan. f
33. We suggest that the applicant review and clarify the proposedexisting
elevations for the exit area (south end) of the porte-cochere drive, as it appears
a low point will be created in the area of the 13.93 elevation near the
intersection of the gutter line and the extension of the north curb. The applicant
shall clarify how this area will drain. 1
34. The applicant shall provide a note on ‘the engineering plan, consistent with the
site plan, stating, “All handicap accessible ramps shall meet all applicable
local, regional, state, and federal accessibility guidelines and regulations. Any
modzjkations shall be approved by the, engineer-ofrecord.
Conditions of Approval
1. “Applicant shall copy to the City all permit applications, permits, certlfications -
and approvals. ” (City Engineer)
2. “Applicant shall provide all necessary construction zone signage and fencing
as required by the City Engineer. ” (City Engineer)
3. “Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land
alteration permit, applicant shall prqvide cost estimates in accordance with
LDR Section 78-309 and 78-461 and for on-site project improvements, not
includini public infrastructure, or lankaping and irrigation costs for review
and approval by the City. The cost estimates shall be signed and sealed by an
engineer and landscape architect registered in the state of Florida and shall be
posted with the City, prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit.
(City Engineer)
4. “The construction, operation and/or maintenance of any elements of the subject
project shall not have any negative impacts on the existing drainage of
surrounding areas. $ at any time during the project development, it is
\\pbgsfile\Growth-Managemen tWlanning-and-Zoning\jholloman\CASE FILESTEMPLE JUDEA\LBFH comments 9 13
06.doc
I Temple Judea - Classroom Expansion
LBFH File No. 05-4457
Page 4 of 4
determined by the City that any of the surrounding areas are experiencing
negative drainage impacts caused by the project, it shall be the applicant’s
responsibility to cure said impacts in a period of time and a manner acceptable
to the City prior to additional construction activities. ” (City Engineer)
*
5. “Prior to issuance of the first land alteration permit, applicant shall submit
signed/sealed/dated construction plans (paving/grading/drainage and water/
sewer) and all pertinent calculations for review and comment. (City Engineer)
“Prior to construction plan approyal and the issuance of the first land
alteration permit, applicant shall schedule a pre-permit meeting with City
sta@ ” (City Engineer)
6.
7. “Prior to the issuance of the first land alteration permit the applicant shall
provide to the City, letters of authorization from the applicable utility
companies allowing landscaping and light poles. to be placed within the utility
easements. ” (City Engineer)
8. “Applicant shall not& the City’s Public Works Division at least 10 working
days prior to the commencement of any worWconstruction activity within any
public right-of-way within the City of Palm Beach Gardens. In the case of a city
right-of-way, the applicant has at least five working days to obtain a right-of-
way permit. Right-of-way permits may be obtained at the Building Division.
Failure to comply with this condition could result in a Stop Work Order of all
workhonstruction activity within the public right-of-way and the subject
development site. ” (Public Works) -
.
1
The applicant shall provide a written response to all comments, indicating
acknowledgement of each comment ‘and how each comment has been
addressed. Compliance will expedite the subsequent review.
The applicant is reminded that all sub,mittals are to.be made to the City of
Palm Beach Gardens Growth Management Department.
JATD/mef
cc: Michael Sanchez - Palm Beach Gardens (msanchez@pbgfl.com)
Anne Booth - Urban Design Studio (ABooth@udsonline.com)
Pat Lawson - Keshavarz & Associates (pat@keshavarz.com)
’Robert Canterbury - Keshavarz & Associates (robert@keshavarz.com)
\\pbgsfile\Growth_Management\Planning-and-Zoning\jholloman\CASE FILES\TEMPLE JUDEA\LBFH comments 9 I 3
06.doc
CITY OF PALM BEACH G'ARDENS
10500 N. MILTARY TRAIL PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410-4698
April 13,2004
Ms. Anne Booth
Urban Design Studio
477 South Rosemary Avenue, Suite 225
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
Re: SP-03-24: Temple Judea Minor Site Plan Review
Dear Ms. Booth:
At its April 13,2004, meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Palm .
Beach Gardens voted to grant approval of the above-referenced petition to allow the
construction of a covered walkway, porte-cochere, new access drive, and other minor site
improvements to the Temple Judea site. Said construction shall be in accordance with
the following plans on file with the City's Growth Management Department:
1. Site Plan, prepared by Urban Design Studio, last revised on March 16, 2004, and
received and stamped by the City on March 16,2004.
2. Landscape Plan and Plant List, prepared by Urban Design Studio, last revised on
March 8,2004, and received and stamped by the City on March 16,2004.
3. Lighting Plan, prepared by Urban Design Studioj last revised on February 16,
2004, and received and stamped by the City on February 19,2004.
4. Sheets Al.1, A5.0, & A5.1: hchitectural Plans, prepared by Douglas Root
Architects, dated December 16,' 2003, and received and stamped by the City on
December 30,2003.
e
I
Said approval is contingent upon the followingconditions which shall be binding on the
applicant, its'successors andor assigns:
e
1. Within 120 days of approval of the subject petition, the applicant shall provide a
landscape plan for the northern road shoulder and median of the portion of Hood
Road adjacent to the Temple Judea site for review and approval by the City
Forester. Said landscaping shall be installed by the applicant, 'or through a
separate agreement acceptable to the City provide bond, surety, or monies based
on the Hood Road landscape plans to have the landscaping installed, within 60
days of the completion of the Hood Road improvements. (City Forester)
2. The applicant, successors, or assigns shall bear its proportionate share of the cost
of the continued landscape maintenance of the northern road shoulder and one-
half (%) of the median of the portion of Hood Road adjacent to the Temple Judea
3.
4.
site. In the event a special district is formed by the' City of Palm Beach Gardens,
or another entity, pertaining to the landscape maintenance of Hood Road, then
Temple Judea of Palm Beach County, Inc., shall automatically become a member.
This condition may be amended at any time by a separate agreement between the
applicant and the City of Palm Beach Gardens. (City Forester)
All rooffop mechanical equipment shall be screened fiom view. (Planning and
Zoning)
;
If at any time the City determines that the grass parking spaces are in disrepair or
poor appearance due to lack of maintenance, the City may require the owner or
notice fiom the City. Upon failure by the owner or successor to comply therewith
in the time provided, the City may require the parking spaces to be totally or
partially paved within 150 days of receipt by the owner or-successor of written
notice. All such paving shall be conducted in accordance with the City's
standards at the time of paving. All such costs shall be the responsibility of the
owner or successor. (Planning and Zoning)
successor to correct the deficiency within 30 calendar days of receipt of written -.
'
This letter officially documents the approval of Petition SP-03-24 allowing for the
construction of a covered walkway, porte-cochere, new access drive, and other minor site
improvements on the Temple Judea site.
Should you require any additional information, please contact Michael J. Sanchez, Senior
Planner, at (561.) 799-4241. 0 P
v-
Chair, Planning and Zoning Commission
C. Tala1 M. Benothman, Planning and Zoning Division Director
Bahareh Wolfs, Development Compliance Officer
Jack Hanson, Chief Building Official
Lisa Scalabrin, Accoutant
Michael J. Sanchez, Senior Planner
a I?
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
10500 N. MILTARY TRAIL PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410-4698
-.
c November 14,2003
Ms. Anne Booth
Urban Design Studio
477 S. Rosemary Avenue
Suite 225 - The Lofts at City Place
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
Re: ADMIN-03-68: Temple Judea - Roof Repair and Structure Enclosures
Dear Ms. Booth:
Upon review of the above-referenced request, the City hereby approves the request for roof
repair and replacement, the enclosure of an outdoor patio for use as an office, and the enclosure
of the existing entrance foyer at the Temple Judea of Palm Beach County located on Hood Road
(formerly the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints). The approved modifications to the
existing structure will result in a net increase of 658 square feet. The City’s Traffic Consultant
has indicated in the attached memorandum that, including the proposed modifications, the
project is in compliance with the City’s Traffic Performance Standards.
The improvements shall be constructed in accordance with the following development plans on
file with the City’s Growth Management Department:
0
1. Sheet A1 .O: Roof Plan, prepared by Douglas Root Architects, received and stamped by
the City on September 24,2003.
2. Sheet A3.0: Floor Plan, prepared by Douglas Root Architects, received and stamped by
the City on September 24,2003.
3. Sheet A5.0: Elevations, Roof Material, & Colors, prepared by Douglas Root Architects,
received and stamped by the City on November 7,2003.
This approval officially documents the administrative amendment for roof repair and
replacement, the enclosure of an outdoor patio for use as an office, and the enclosure the existing
entrance foyer at the Temple Judea of Palm Beach County. Should you have any questions or
comments, please feel free to contact Michael J. Sanchez, Senior Planner, at (561) 799-4243. SLwk
Tala1 M. Benothman, AICP
Principal Planner
City of Palm Beach Gardens 0 c. Charles K. Wu, Growth Management Administrator - Bahareh Wolfs, Development Compliance Officer
Jack Hanson, Chief Building Official
Michael J. Sanchez, Senior Planner
-- -I
L
-.*
? t'
F. 1 I- I
I
IC- -
r
7
\
\
c n
7
4. 0 0
-- -
P 71
I
P
k G
\
I
?
1
I
I- -
C
I
a . I 1 i I I
I
I
I
I
j
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
zr lirn
I I,
I-L
1 i I
5 In
- I Temple Judea
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
Site Plan
Temple Judea
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
Landscape Plan
3 ". n e
I- D
m a
V 9 2 m
I. -+ a-
x) 0
I i I I I I I 1
i
!
I I
1 I I I I
I (--I Ill I
cn 0 0
I Temple Judea
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
Details
I
h ?- F: tD 3 EL
4 Temple Judea
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
Streetscape Landscape Plan
-L
Temple Judea
4 Palm Beach Gardens, Florida
d
0 Landscapelopenspace Plan
P L 8% sg E
I
I
I I
-I I
II I
I
I
I
-1
I
XI
I -
3
I
I '\ I oi '?
1 4
a
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
i
L- .-
MI
.
-. r
- -1 .- -
i I
4311 HOOD ROAD
e e I 4- E i -7 f s Ii I ':
I
I- I.1 ii I
I
, 1 i
I 1
,
I
'!
1: !
I
I ,
4, I
'I
i,i 'I -:--
i
*I 1
c-r- - I I I I
1: - - I-- ? --- - '/ \ '
9 P
10 ;I .-
'
~
~ --
1 -- I
ARCHITECT AND AS
4311 HOOD ROAD
i
i
i
4311 HOOD ROAD
PALM BEACH GAREDMS FLORKlA
ARCHITECT AND ASSOCUTES, PA.
----- __ --- -------
---___
8 O n
D z
?
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
c-
I I // I I / I ,,/
--%
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I I 1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I I
I I
I
/? -*--
---- I
\" w
A L. - I t II ii -7
f 3
Q 3 l! I 3
r--
TEMPLE JUDEA PHASE I
SCHOOL ADDITION
E
4
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
Request to Address City Council
Please Print
Subject : 7”e~fQ 19, ThbE8. co WSTkV ct’:o d
\
id
Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public”
portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City
Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting.
The time.limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes. “F -
- -_ .ad-- . - ~ COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC‘
\ Request to Address City Council
Please Print
Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public”
portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City
Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting.
The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.