HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda P&Z 090908CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
10500 N. MILITARY TRAIL PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410-4698
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 9,2008
TO:
FROM: Growth Management Department
SUBJECT
Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board Members
Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board Meeting
Tuesday, September 9,2008 - 6:30 P.M.
Enclosed is the agenda containing the items to be presented on Tuesday, September 9,
2008. This meeting will be held in the Council Chambers, Palm Beach Gardens
Municipal Building, 10500 North Military Trail, beginning at 6:30 p.m.
Enclosed with this memorandum are the following items:
1. An agenda for the meeting; and
2. A Growth Management Department staffreport for the items to be heard.
As always, the respective Project Managers’ telephone numbers and e-mail addresses
have been provided in case you have any questions or require additional information on
any petition. This will help us offer better staff support in the review of these
applications.
Nina Sorenson, Administrative Specialist 11, will call to confirm your attendance.
I
Karb L. Irwin, AICP
Growth Management Administrator
AGENDA
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 9,2008 AT 6:30 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
0 CALLTOORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
0 ROLLCALL
0
0 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: N/A
REPORT BY THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATOR: KARA IRWIN
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
Regular Members: Alternates:
Craig Kunkle (Chair)
Douglas Pennell (Vice Chair)
Barry Present
Randolph Hansen
Dennis Solomon
Michael Panczak
Joy Hecht
Amir Kanel (lst Alt.)
Donald &an (2”d Alt.)
Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board
September 9,2008
1.
Recommendation to City Council:
Ex Parte Communication (Public Hearing)
SPLA-08-08-000012: The Gardens Mall - Figs Restaurant
A request by Gary K. Ross of Triad Construction, to consider and approve a minor site
plan amendment to allow for the exterior elevation changes to accommodate the 2,208
square-foot restaurant located within the Gardens Mall. The restaurant, known as Fig’s,
is located on the west side of the Macy’s Department Store, and the Applicant is
requesting one tenant wall sign and an exterior trellis feature at the entrance. The
Gardens Mall is located on the north side of PGA Boulevard between Alternate A1A and
Prosperity Farms Road.
Project Manager: Richard Marrero, Senior Planner nnarrero@,pbdl.com (79942 19)
Recommendation to City Council:
Ex Parte Communication (Public Hearing)
Petition MISC-08-04-000042 - The Decorators Unlimited at Northcorp PCD
A request by Johnston Group Land Development Consultants, Inc., agent, on behalf of
South Park Center 11, LTD, for approval to allow the addition of an ornamental tower
element with two signs on the west elevation of the Decorators Unlimited building and
minor modifications to the site and landscape plans for the site. The 3.01-acre parcel is
located in South Park Center, Lot 2, Northcorp Planned Community District, on the west
side of Riverside Drive approximately 300 feet north of Burns Road and adjacent to
Interstate 95.
2.
Project Manager: Richard Marrero, Senior Planner rmaiTero@pbgfl.coin (79942 19)
3. OLD BUSINESS
4. NEW BUSINESS
5. ADJOURNMENT
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Florida Statute 286.26. persons with disabilities needing special accommodations to
participate in this proceeding should contact the City Clerks Office. no later than Jive days prior to the proceeding, at telephone number (561)
799-4120 for assistance; if hearing impaired, telephone the Florida Relay Service Numbers (800) 955-8771 (TDD) or (800) 955-8770 (VOICE),
for assistance. Ifa person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board, Local Planning Agency, or Land
Development Regulations Commission, with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, they will need a record of the
proceedings: and for such, they may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and
evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Exact legal description and/or survey for the cases may be obtainedfiom the files in the Growth
Management Department.
Commodpz agenda 09-09-2008.doc
2
PLANNING, ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD
AGENDA COVER MEMORANDUM
Date Prepared: August 28,2008
Meeting Date: September 9,2008
Petition No. SPLA-08-08-000012
SUBJECTIAGENDA ITEM
SPLA-08-08-000012: The Gardens Mall - Figs Restaurant
Recommendation to City Council: A request by Gary K. Ross of Triad Construction, to consider
and approve a minor site plan amendment to allow for the exterior elevation changes to
accommodate the 2,208 square-foot restaurant located within the Gardens Mall. The restaurant,
known as Fig’s, is located on the west side of the Macy’s Department Store, and the Applicant is
requesting one tenant wall sign and an exterior trellis feature at the entrance. The Gardens Mall is
located on the north side of PGA Boulevard between Alternate A1A and Prosperity Farms Road.
[XI Recommendation to APPROVE with two waivers
[ I Recommendation to DENY
Reviewed by:
Interim City
Attorney
Max Lohman, Esq.
i9LJ Development
Compliance
Bahareh Wolfs,
AICP
Director
Approved by:
Ronald M. Ferris
City Manager
Originating Dept.:
Growth Management:
Manager
Project
Senior Planner
Advertised:
[XI Not Required
Affected Parties:
[XI Not Required
FINANCE: NIA
Tresha Thomas
Costs: $ NIA
Total
$ NIA
Current FY
Funding Source:
[ 3 Operating
[XI Other NIA
Budget Acct.#:
NIA
PZAB Action:
[ ] Rec. Approval
[ ] Rec. App. wl
conditions
[ ] Rec. Denial
[ ] Continued to:
Attachments:
0 Project Narrative
0 Resolution 159,2004
0 Project Application
0 Development Plans
0 Maintenance Plan
Meeting Date: September 9,2008
Date Prepared: August 28,2008
SPLA-08-08-0O0012
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The subject petition involves a request to allow the following improvements to the Macy’s
department store: (1) modifications to the west faqade of the Macy’s building; (2) approval of one
tenant sign for Fig’s restaurant to be located on the west fqade of the building; (3) and modifications
to the site and landscape plans for the areas around the proposed outdoor seating.
BACKGROUND
On February 16, 1984, the City Council approved the development order for the Regional Center
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) through the adoption of Resolution 9,1984. The DRI was
approved for a mixture of land uses consisting of retail, office, hotel, residential, neighborhood
cinema, open space, and community uses.
On November 15,1984, the City Council approved a development order for a “Regional Shopping
Mall” within the Regional Center DRI, to be referred to as the “Gardens Mall,” through the adoption
of Resolution 62, 1984. Said approval provided site plan approval for the construction of retail
shopping mall of no greater than 1,200,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area together with all
incidental uses thereof.
On May 15, 1986, the City Council adopted Resolution 21,1986 amending the development order
for the Gardens Mall (the ‘Mall’) providing for the addition of up to 190,000 square feet of gross
leasable retail floor area, resulting in a maximum of 1,390,000 square feet of gross leasable retail
floor area, and authorizing a parking space reduction from 5.0 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet
of leasable retail floor area, as previously approved, to 4.9 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of
leasable retail floor area.
The City Council approved Resolution 15,2002 and subsequently Resolution 224,2003, thereby
approving the P.F. Chang’s and Brio restaurants consisting of 14,119 square feet, collectively,
located on the southwest portion of the Mall. With the approval of the restaurant buildings, there
exists a balance of 69,607 square feet of gross leasable retail floor area remaining from the 1,390,000
square feet originally approved for the Mall by the City Council.
Most recently, the City Council approved Resolution 159,2004, approving a site plan amendment to
the Gardens Mall property to allow for (1) the construction of a 144,000 square-foot Nordstrom
department store in the location of the existing Burdines building; (2) the expansion of Macy’s
department store by 90,000 square feet; (3) the expansion of the Saks Fifth Avenue department store
by 35,000 square feet; (4) the expansion of the Gardens Mall by 32,000 square feet of gross leasable
area; (5) a reduction in the parking ratio for the Gardens Mall site; and (6) minor modifications to
portions of the Gardens Mall parking lot.
Pursuant to the development program for the Regional Center DRI, restaurant use is a permitted use
2
Meeting Date: September 9,2008
Date Prepared: August 28,2008
SPLA-08-08-000012
and there are no restrictions that regulate the maximum square footages allowed other than the
overall commercial square footage allocated for the Regional Shopping Center. On June 19,2008,
the applicant filed an administrative amendment development application requesting approval of
outdoor seating for the restaurant (Petition no. ADMN-08-06-000236). The administrative
amendment approved the outdoor seating and the associated landscape modifications. With the
administrative amendment application, the applicant proposed modifications to the exterior of the
building and signage which requires City Council approval. Therefore, the applicant has filed the
subject petition requesting approval of the wall sign and exterior modifications.
LAND-USE AND ZONING
The future land-use designation of the subject site as reflected on the City’s Future Land Use Map is
Commercial (C). The zoning classification of the site is Planned Community District (PCD) Overlay
with an underlying zoning of Commercial.
PROJECT DETAILS
Buildinn Site
The site for the restaurant, known as “Figs”, is located on the west side of the existing Macy’s
department store located within the Regional Shopping Mall.
Site Access Circulation
The proposed location for the restaurant can be directly accessed through two (2) driveways leading
to and from Fairchild Gardens Blvd. and Kew Gardens Blvd.
Architectural Stvle
The existing architecture of the Macy’s building will remain unchanged, however, the restaurant
proposes modifications to the exterior in order to accommodate the desired theme and outdoor
seating for the tenant. The modifications proposed to the exterior include: (1) addition of a non-
corrosive metal trellis to be attached to the existing wall that will allow a network of ficus pumila
(commonly known as ‘creeping fig’) to grow; (2) a sign for the “Fig’s” restaurant to be located above
the primary entrance of the tenant space. The applicant has stated that prior to installation of the
trellis, the wall directly behind the trellis will be painted a soft green color to serve as the color
palette until the live greenery has matured. Staff recommends the existing wall color remain
unchanged.
Landscapinz
The subject petition includes landscape modifications to the west faqade of the building adjacent to a
3
Meeting Date: September 9,2008
Date Prepared: August 28,2008
SPLA-08-08-0000 12
and around the proposed outdoor seating for the restaurant. The applicant proposes 12 Cabbage
Palmettos, 12 Sword Ferns, Bougainvillea and Sweet Potato Vines. The applicant has agreed to a
condition of approval to relocate the 4 mature Washingtonia robusta Palms that are proposed to be
removed elsewhere on site. Staff recommends a condition of approval regarding the maintenance of
the Bougainvillea and Creeping Fig in order to ensure the aesthetics of the subject site are preserved
(please see attached maintenance plan).
Parking
Resolution 21,1986 authorized a parking space ratio reduction for the Mall from 5.0 parking spaces
per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area to 4.9 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross
leasable floor area. Through the adoption of Resolution 159,2004, a Mer reduction in the parking
ratio to 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area was approved.
The proposed use, based on the accepted parking ratio for the Gardens Mall, requires 10 parking
spaces. No additional parking spaces are proposed for the addition, since the mall has an excess of
701 parking spaces.
Sianage
The applicant is requesting approval for one (1) wallhenant sign which is constructed as a cabinet-
type sign that is flush-mounted to the wall and located above the first-floor line. Staff has encouraged
the applicant to utilize a reverse-channel letter sign that is flush-mounted to the wall, consistent with
the direction staff has been giving tenants that propose signage within the City. However, there is not
a Code that specifically prohibits the applicant from requesting approval of the proposed cabinet sign
and the applicant feels that the sign is an integral component to the theme of the restaurant. Section
78-285, Table 24, requires that the letter height not exceed 24 inches and be located below the
second-floor line. The applicant proposes a cabinet sign with a letter height of 44.5-inches above the
second-floor line. Therefore, the applicant will need approval of the following two waivers: (1) to
allow for the height of the letters to exceed the maximum allowed by Code; and (2) for the sign to be
located above the second-floor line (please see waiver section).
Drainage
The applicant will use current and existing drainage conditions/pattems on site.
WAIVER REQUESTED
The applicant is requesting approval for two (2) waivers, which is as follows:
Wall Signs: The applicant is requesting two waivers to erect one wallhenant sign with (1)
44.5-inch high letters (2) above the second-floor line.
4
Meeting Date: September 9,2008
Date Prepared: August 28,2008
SPLA-0848-000012
Code Requirement: Section 78-285 of the City’s Land Development Regulations allows for
tenant signs to have a maximum letter height of 24-inches for ground floor users. The
Applicant proposes a tenant with 44.5-inch letters above the second-floor line.
Staff Recommendation: Staff has reviewed the submitted elevations and does not object to
the waiver requests. Staff believes the size of the letters and the placement of the tenant sign
is appropriate due to the size of the building’s faqade. The signs will offer a break in the large
blank wall space that currently exists on-site. Staff recommends APPROVAL of the
requested waivers. However, staff encourages the applicant to utilize reverse-channel letters
that are flush-mounted for the proposed tenant sign for the restaurant.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends APPROVAL of petition SPLA-08-08-000012 with two waivers and the
following conditions of approval:
0 The exterior wall color behind the trellis shall match the existing color of the Macy’s
building.
The maintenance, pursuant to the maintenance plan, of the Bougainvillea hedge and the
Creeping Fig shall be kept in good condition and safe to the public. If it is determined by the
Applicant, successors or assigns that the Bougainvillea hedge or the Creeping Fig needs to be
removed for any reason, the Applicant shall be required to remove the trellis and replace the
plants with a different species through an administrative approval.
0
5
City Council Narrative
Project: Figs Restaurant at Macy’s at Gardens Mall
Background: Macy’s is having an upscale restaurant, Figs, constructed in a
portion of the Macy’s store located at the Gardens Mall. Opening
of the restaurant is scheduled for Fall 2008. When operational, the
evening hours will extend later than the normal business hours of
Macy’s retail department store operation. When the operational
hours of Macy’s retail department store operation and Figs
coincide, the restaurant may be accessed from both the interior
of Macy’s and from an exterior entrance directly into the
restaurant. When the restaurant is open for business later than
the Macy’s business hours, access is limited to the exterior
entrance directly into the restaurant. Identification of this
entrance exclusive to the restaurant only is critical to the
resta u rant‘s success.
Petition: The applicant is petitioning the City of Palm Beach Gardens City
Council for consideration and subsequent approval of two items.
These items are components of Figs’ national branding. Each is
described in detail in the accompanying information package. In
brief, these items are:
01. A sign to be installed on the existing wall of Macy’s that
gives the name of the restaurant and provides direction to
the entrance.
02. A non-corrosive metal trellis, also to be attached to the
existing wall of Macy’s, to allow a network of ficus pumila
(commonly known as creeping fig) vines to provide a green
screen to the wall that has now become the exterior wall of
the restaurant This green screen distinguishes that portion
of the greater Macy’s wall as the restaurant in a subtle and
pleasing manner.
Prior to installation of the trellis the wall directly behind the
trellis will be painted a soft green color to serve as the
color palate until the live greenery has matured.
Thank you for your consideration of this petition.
Date Prepared: July 29,2004
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
RESOLUTION 159,2004
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA APPROVING A SITE PLAN
AMENDMENT FOR THE GARDENS MALL LOCATED WITHIN THE
REGIONAL CENTER DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
(DRI)/PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (PCD) LOCATED
ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF
ALTERNATE AIA AND PGA BOULEVARD, AS MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, TO ALLOW: (1) THE
DEPARTMENT STORE IN THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING
BURDINES BUILDING; (2) THE EXPANSION OF MACY’S
DEPARTMENT STORE BY 90,000 SQUARE FEET; (3) THE
EXPANSION OF THE SAKS FIFTH AVENUE DEPARTMENT
STORE BY 35,000 SQUARE FEET; (4) THE EXPANSION OF THE
GARDENS MALL BY 32,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS
LEASABLE FLOOR AREA; (5) A REDUCTION IN THE PARKING
RATIO FOR THE GARDENS MALL SITE; AND (6) MINOR
MODIFICATIONS TO PORTIONS OF THE GARDENS MALL
PARKING LOT; PROVIDING FOR WAIVERS; PROVIDING FOR
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
CONSTRUCTION OF A 144,000 SQUARE-FOOT NORDSTROM
WHEREAS, on November 15, 1984, the City Council approved a development
order for a “Regional Shopping Mall” within the Regional Center DRI, to be referred to
as the “Gardens Mall,” through the adoption of Resolution 62, 1984, allowing for the
construction of a retail shopping mall of no greater than 1,200,000 square feet of gross
leasabte floor area together with all incidental uses thereof; and
WHEREAS, on May 15, 1986, the City Council adopted Resolution 21, 1986
amending said development order for the Gardens Mall and providing for the addition of
190,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area, resulting in a maximum of 1,390,000
square feet of gross leasable floor area, and authorizing a parking space reduction to
4.9 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area; and
WHEREAS, there currently exists a balance of 69,607 square feet of unbuilt
gross leasable floor area remaining from the 1,390,000 square feet of gross leasable
floor area vested for the Mall site; and
WHEREAS, the City has received a request from Mr. Rick Warner of Warner
Real Estate Advisors, Inc., on behalf of The Gardens Venture, LLC, for approval of a
site plan amendment to the Gardens Mall property to allow: (1) the construction of a
144,000 square-foot Nordstrom department store in the location of the existing Burdines
Date Prepared: July 29,2004
Resolution 159,2004
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 a 25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
building; (2) the expansion of Macy's department store by 90,000 square feet; (3) the
expansion of the Saks Fifth Avenue department store by 35,000 square feet; (4) the
expansion of the Gardens Mall by 32,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area; (5) a
reduction in the parking ratio for the Gardens Mall site; and (6) minor modifications to
portions of the Gardens Mall parking lot; and
WHEREAS, said site plan amendment will allow the construction of the
remaining unbuilt and vested entitlements for the Gardens Mall of 69,067 square feet of
gross leasable floor area; and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application,
has determined that it is sufficient and has recommended approval; and
WHEREAS, the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board reviewed said site plan
amendment petition at its July 27, 2004, meeting and recommended its approval by a
vote of 5-0; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the evidence and testimony
presented by the Petitioner and other interested parties and the recommendations of
the various City of Palm Beach Gardens review agencies and staR and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that adoption of this Resolution is in
the best interest of the citizens and residents of the City of Palm Beach Gardens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA that:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and ratified.
SECTION 2. The amended development plans for the Gardens Mall property are
hereby APPROVED on the following described real property, subject to the conditions of
approval contained herein, which are in addition to the general requirements otherwise
provided by resolution:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
THE GARDENS MALL
LEGAL DESCRIPTION AS FOUND ON THE PLAT OF THE GARDENS MALL
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 70 PAGE 24, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
PUBLIC RECORDS.
CONTAINING 100.367 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
2
Date Prepared: July 29,2004
Resolution 159,2004
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 5: 25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida hereby
approves the following four (4) waivers:
1. Section 78414, entitled Number of spaces required, to allow for a total of
40 bicycle parking spaces on site.
2. Section 78-315(b), entitled Landscape islands, to allow more than nine (9)
parking spaces in a row without the inclusion of a landscape island
certain areas reflected on the approved site plan.
3. Section 78-285, entitled Permitted signs, to allow for two (2) wall signs (on
separate elevations) for the Saks building; three (3) wall signs (on
separate elevations) for the Nordstrom building; and a total of five (5) wall
signs for the Burdines-Macy’s building.
4. Section 78-285, entitled Permitted signs, to allow wall signs in excess of
the 90 square-foot maximum size requirement for principal tenant signs,
dimensions of which are noted on the approved development plans.
SECTION 4. Said approval is subject to the following conditions, which shall be
the responsibility of the applicant, its successors, or assigns:
Enaineerinq
1. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant
shall provide the City with a copy of the recorded easement vacation
documents. (City Engineer)
2. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall provide
a pavement marking and signage plan for the parking areas being
improved as part of the current Mall expansion. (City Engineer)
3. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant
shall provide a letter from the utility owners permitting proposed
landscaping and irrigation facilities within their easements. (City Engineer)
Plannina and Zoning
4. There shall be at least five (5) bicycle parking spaces at each of the three
(3) newly expanded department stores (Saks, Nordstrom & Burdines-
Macy’s), at least ten (10) additional bicycle parking spaces elsewhere on
site, together with the existing fifteen (15) bicycle parking spaces, for a
total of forty (40) bicycle parking spaces on site. (Planning & Zoning)
3
Date Prepared: July 29,2004 Resolution 159,2004
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 a:
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
5.
6.
7.
a.
9.
IO.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall provide
a revised detail of the proposed landscape diamonds, the design of which
shall allow for the adjacent parking spaces to meet the requirements of the
City’s LDRs while providing adequate area for the proposed landscaping.
(Planning & Zoning, City Forester)
The duration of the waiver allowing for more than nine (9) parking spaces
in a row without the inclusion of a landscape island within certain existing
parking areas shall be limited to this site plan amendment approval only.
Any future site plan amendments to the Mall site shall be required to meet
said requirement or request a waiver from the City Council for same.
(Planning & Zoning, City Forester)
All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from view. (Planning
& Zoning)
Lighting shall not conflict with landscaping, including long-term tree
growth. (Police)
All lighting for streets, parking lots, and pedestrian walkways shall be
metal halide. Metal halide lighting shall be used for the multi-use
pathways and sidewalks within the site and shall be lit at a minimum of
0.6-fOOt candles. (Police)
Non-glare building lighting shall be installed around the entire building
perimeter and on pedestrian walkways. (Police)
Entry signage shall be lighted. (Police)
Timer clock or photocell lighting shall be provided for nighttime use above
or near entryways and all exits, including emergency exits. (Police)
Numerical addresses shall be unobstructed, illuminated for nighttime
visibility, and placed at the rear of each business. (Police)
All structures shall use the following target-hardening techniques:
a. Buildings shall be pre-wired for an alarm system.
b. Doors shall be equipped with metal plates over the threshold of the
locking mechanism.
c. Glass perimeter doors shall be equipped with case-hardened guard
rings to protect the mortise lock cylinder.
4
Date Prepared: July 29,2004
Resolution 159,2004
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
d. Rear doors shall have 180-degree peephole viewers.
e. All perimeter doors shall be equipped with hinges that utilize non-
removable hinge pins. (Police)
15. Exterior roll-up doors shall be target hardened. (Police)
16. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall work
with the Police Department to develop a high-resolution, security
surveillance system with monitoring and photo printout capabilities. The
Police Chief shall have final approval on the required number of cameras
and locations thereof within the site. (Police)
Miscellaneous
17. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, required digital
files of the approved plat, civil design, and architectural drawings shall be
submitted to the Planning and Zoning Division. (GIs Manager,
Development Compliance Officer)
SECTION 5. Said improvements shall be constructed in compliance with the
following plans on file with the City's Growth Management Department:
I. ' Nordstrom Architectural Plans, prepared by Callison Architecture, Inc.,
25
26
27
28 2.
29
30
31
32 3.
33
34
35 4.
36
37
38
39 5.
40
41
42
43 6.
44
dated July 2, 2004, and received and stamped by the City on July 14,
2004.
Sheets L-01 thru L-04: Nordstrom Landscape Plans, prepared by Grissim
Metz Andriese Associates, last revised on June 30, 2004, and received
and stamped by the City on July 14,2004.
Burdines-Macy's Architectural Plans, prepared by BHDP Architecture and
received and stamped by the City on July 14,2004.
Sheets L-I .O thru L-3.0: Burdines-Macy's Landscape Plans, prepared by
Grissim Metz Andriese Associates, last revised on June 30, 2004, and
received and stamped by the City on July 14,2004.
Saks Fifth Avenue Architectural Plans, prepared by Crawford McWilliams
Hatcher Architects, Inc., and received and stamped by the City on July 14,
2004.
Sheets LO1 thru L-04: Saks Landscape Plans, prepared by Grissim Metz
Andriese Associates, last revised on June 30, 2004, and received and
stamped by the City on July 14,2004.
5
Date Prepared: July 29,2004
Resolution 159,2004
7. Gardens Mall Expansion Development Plans, prepared by JPRA
Architects, last revised on July 13,2004, and received and stamped by the
SECTION 6. Said approval shall be consistent with all representations made by
SECTION 7. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
3 City on July 14,2004.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 PASSED AND ADOPTED this jv day of WiCOl- ,2004.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18 19 ATTEST: -
20
21
22 BY:
the applicant or applicant’s agents at any workshop or public hearing.
ai:
25
26 LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
27
28
29 BY:
30
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
Christine P. Tatum, City Attorney
31
32
33 VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT
34
35 MAYOR JABLIN J--
36
37 VICE MAYOR RUSSO J--
38
39 COUNCILMEMBERDELGADO ---
40
41 COUNCILMEMBERLEW ---
42
43
44
/
J
G:bttomey-share\RESOLUTIONS\Gardens Mall Reso 159 2004.doc
6
.
CITY PALM BEACH GARDENS
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Planning and Zoning Division
Growth Management Department
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
10500 North Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
(561) 799-4243 Fax (561) 799-4281
Rea uest :
- Planned Community Development (PCD)
- Planned Unit Development (PUD)
- Amendment to PCD, PUD or Site Plan
- Conditional Use
- Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
- Administrative Approval - Miscellaneous
- Administrative Appeal - Other
Date Submitted:
Project Name: TE ECU 5 &It> g&ddq L 6 #= LA% kt rI A-LY'S 6h-s
- Annexation
- Rezoning
- Site Plan Review
- Concurrency Certificate
- Time Extension
I FQPRIS /co~e,~ FLO~~DA ~ebmzer1~5 LIT l"lb
Agent's Mailing Address:
Agent's Telephone Number: Fax Number:
Petition Number:
Fees Received
Date & Time Receive
1
Information concerning all requests (attach additional sheets if needed.)
{Section 78-46, Application Procedures, Land Development Regulations}
mt 1. Explain the nature of the request: Glddrt c? 40 dp'
2. What will be the impact of the proposed change on the surrounding area?
3. Describe how the rezoning request complies with the City's Vision Plan and the following elements
of the City's Comprehensive Plan - Future Land Use, Transportation, Housing, Infrastructure, Coastal
Management, Conservation, Recreation and Open space, Intergovernmental Coordination and Capital
Improvement.
4. How does the proposed project comply with City requirements for preservation of natural resources
and native vegetation (Section 78-301, Land Development Regulations)?
3
1. That he/she is the fee simple title owner of the property described in the attached
Legal Description.
&UNC(L 6.ppPoVAC fin Qwrlxmfi
2. That helshe is requesting 5(6,J~4 a~ -m&Cu 5 in the FEA#e P-T
City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. F145 br rC-VS
A LtkL GSDtw5
3. That he/she has appointed k %5s - Gbr- to act
as authorized agent on hisher behalf to accomplish the above project.
Name of Owner:
e
FNamelTitle mm gyw dGs &mwG!?
Signature of Owner
b -Be>ecAc frteea as 3461 &-A t5X.d
City, State, Zip Code Street Address FbaW 33@8
P. 0. Box City, State, Zip Code
Telephone Number Fax Number
E-mail Address
, 2oQd. lh Sworn and subscribed before me this 26 -- day of /Q U6( )Lr J& J?w
Notary Public
My Commission expires:
I- 17-07
5
Applicant's Certification
I/We affirm and certifL that I/we understand and will comply with the land development regulations of
the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. I/WE further certify that the statements or diagrams made on
any paper or plans submitted herewith are true to the best of my/our knowledge and belief. Further,
I/we understand that this
official records of the City
become a part of the
Applicant is:
Signature of Applicant
- Owner
Print Name of Applicant
- Optionee 3$06 -13 ci?6%f.. P&&A~
Street Address
- Lessee /LTUdT4 Le 5331
City, State, Zip Code
Agent __ (7-70) %I q300
Telephone Number
- Contract Purchaser (770) 401 q4bl
Fax Number
6
Jun .If ut5 u4:svp I KlAU GWNS I KUC; I ION GO.
,
fl
305.932.7938 P. 1
Palm Beach Gardens Growth hfanagemnl Department
10500 North Militaiy Jrail. Palm Beach Gardens, FL 334 10
561-799-4230
Permit #
Financial Responsibilitv Form
The owner understands that all City-incurred professional fees and expenses associated with the
processing of this application request are ultimately the responsibility of the owner. A security
deposit snall be deposited in an interest-bearing account with any accrued interest to be retained by the
City of Palm Beach Gardens.
The owner and/or designee shall be invoiced on a monthly basis for professional fees such as, but not
limited to. consultant engineering services, legal services, advertising costs, and/or any other costs
attributable to the processing of Ihe permit for which the City incurred during the previous month. The
owner andlor designee shall reimburse the City within thirty (30) days from date of invoice. If payment is
not received, the City may utilize the security deposit for re-imbursement purposes. All activities related
to the pending permit(s1 will cease until any outstanding invoices are paid.
The ownerldesignee further understands that transfer of this responsibility shall require a
completed form, signed and notarized by the responsible party, and delivered to the City Growth
andlor address of the responsible party changes at anytime
- 17-08
Owner signature Date
- Owner printed name Property Control Number
n
NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF F~OAly3A
COUNTY OF Lfl n €ACH
I hereby certify that the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this @%?'a, of
to me or has produced
JVNE ,20&8by TTfl~W ck4 I &Vc"ls . He or she is perso-
as identification. cgw Ah& $w
Notary public signafure
- QIA/r/E -bbJOEe5 a 0 KO/./
State of Fc 0 Kt CM at-large
Prinfed name
MY Commission expires: I - I 4 ,-
. .
LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION
As Registered Agent and Managing Partner, ForbeslCohen Florida Properties, Limited Partnership,
I, Sidney Forbes, authorize Thomas Cairnes, Director of Planning and Construction, The Forbes
Company, to sign all planning and permitting documents associated with The Gardens Mall and
Macy's. .
/'
I \/
Sidney Forbes W
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of (h@ I2008,
by Sidney Forbes, Registered AgenuManaging Partner of ForbeslCohen Properties, Limited
Partnership.
/ .s e
State of FLORIDA
County of PALM BEACH
Print, Type or Stamp Commissioned Name
of Notary Public
I. David Scheiner
President & Chief Operating Officer
Macy's Florida
22 East Flagler Street, Miami, Florida 33131 I 305.577.2525 phone 305.577.1386 fax
February 25, 2008
To Whom It May Concern:
Pursuant to our Delegation of Authority Resolution for Macy 's Florida Stores,
LLC, Operating Vice Presidents and higher have the authority to sign on behalf
of the company.
This delegation provides Mr. Frank Molfetto, Vice President with the authority
to represent Macy's as an "owner" to any state, county, city and municipality
for the purpose of applying to buitding and zoning and other agencies related
to new bui [ding, alterations and modifications requiring construction and
related activities.
If there are any questions, you may contact me.
'
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF MIAMI-OAOE
Sworn to and subscribed before me this 25 day of February, 2008, by
J. David Scheiner, who is personally known to me.
\
. &L/
Notary Public (signature)
NOTA!Y PUBLIC-STPJE OF FLORIDA
Barbara Liebeman
Commission # DD610854
Expires: NOV 01,2010
BONDED THRUMLWTIC BONDiNG CO., INC.
(Name of Notary, printed, typed or stamped)
a .- ..- ,. ... ...
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS PLANNING, ZONING, AND APPEALS BOARD 0 Agenda Cover Memorandum
[ ] Operating
[XI , Other NA
Date Prepared: May 12,2008
Meeting Date: September 9,2008
Petition: MISC-08-04-000042
1 Budget Acct.#:
0
0
I
N/A
Bahareh K. Wolfs, AICP
Sub i ect/APenda Item :
Petition MISC-08-04-000042 - The Decorators Unlimited at Northcorp PCD
Judicial
[ 3 Legislative
[ 1 Public
Hearing
Recommendation to City Council: A request by Johnston Group Land Development Consultants, Inc.,
agent, on behalf of South Park Center 11, LTD, for approval to allow the addition of an ornamental tower
element with two signs on the west elevation of the Decorators Unlimited building and minor modifications to
the site and landscape plans for the site. The 3 .O 1 -acre parcel is located in South Park Center, Lot 2, Northcorp
Planned Community District, on the west side of Riverside Drive approximately 300 feet north of Burns Road
and adjacent to Interstate 95.
[ X ] Recommendation to APPROVE 1 waiver
~
NA
X 1 Recommendation to DENY 1 waiver
Reviewed by: 1 Originating Dept.:
0 Resolution 68, 1996
0 Resolution 48, 1996
Ordinance 1, 1990
Growth Management: City Attorney:
Max Lohman, Interim City
Attorney
Development Compliance: I [ X 3 Quasi-
Adm
Kara L. Irwin, 1
Date:
Paper:
I
4Ep I [ X ] Not Required
Approved By:
City Manager:
Public Notice:
[ 1 Yes
[ X ] Not required
Ronald M. Ferris
Finance Dept.:
Allan Owens
NIA
Administrator
Senior Accountant:
Tresha Thomas
FeesPaid: [ ]Yes
Funding Source:
Planning, Zoning, and
Appeals Board
Action:
I [ ]Recommend
Approval
[ ]Recommend
Approval wlconditions
[ 3 Recommend Denial
[ 3 Continued
to:
Attachments:
0 Applicant's
Narrative &
Justification
Plans
0 Resolution 2, 1997
Date Prepared: May 12,2008
Meeting Date: September 9,2008
Petition: MISC-08-04-000042
BACKGROUND
On January 18, 1990, the City Council adopted Ordinance 1, 1990 rezoning Northcorp Center, RCA
Boulevard Center, West Park Center, and South Park Center from Research and Light Industrial (M-1) to
Planned Community District (PCD)/Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) with underlying zoning of M- 1.
Furthermore, Ordinance 1,1990 provided that subsequent approvals shall be by resolution without newspaper
publication or notice being required. Conditions of approval for development of the individual PUDs within
the PCD were outlined in Ordinance 1, 1990.
Through the adoption of Resolution 48,1996 on March 21, 1996, the City Council approved the site plan for
the development of a 28-foot tall, 47,000-square-foot building located on Lot 2 of South Park Center within the
Northcorp Planned Community District (PCD). The plans included 7,500 square feet of future ancillary office
space in a mezzanine above the main floor of the warehouse area.
On April 18,1996, through the adoption of Resolution 68,1996, the City Council approved a reduction in the
size of the building from 47,000 square feet to 45,309 square feet in order to meet open space requirements.
Resolution 2,1997, which was adopted by the City Council on February 6,1997, approved an amendment to
the site plan and also included changes to the ground signs, wall signs, and the addition of two directional
signs. The approval included a 24-inch-high sign for Decorators Unlimited at the northern end of the west
elevation wall facing Interstate 95. There is also one principal tenant sign currently displayed on the east
building elevation facing Riverside Drive.
LAND USE AND ZONING 0
The subject site is zoned Planned Community Development (PCD) Overlay District with a Research & Light
Industrial Park (M-1) underlying zoning district. The future land-use designation ofthe site is Industrial (I).
PROJECT DETAILS
The applicant is requesting approval to add an architectural tower element on the west building elevation
facing Interstate 95 as a means to enhance the appearance of the existing building and to provide a location to
display two principal tenant signs. The applicant states that the existing sign on the west elevation of the
building is no longer visible to motorists due to the recent widening and reconstruction of Interstate 95. The
upper tier of the 24-foot-tall tower will be angled so that its facades are visible to both the north-bound and
south-bound traffic on Interstate 95. The applicant is also requesting approval to relocate the existing
monument sign and associated landscaping.
Architecture
The applicant states several design concepts were considered for the tower element, including a rotunda style,
but contends that the 45-degree angled-tower design was chosen in order to fit the existing building, to provide
a tower faqade large enough to accommodate the proposed signage, and to also provide visibility to motorists
on Interstate 95. (Please see applicant’s attached “Project Narrative” for a detailed explanation.)
The applicant states the proposed 24-foot-tall tower feature has been designed to complement the architectural
style of the existing 28-foot-tall-building. Section 78-1 84 of the Land Development Regulations states that
building height limitations shall not apply to such architectural features not used for human occupancy.
Therefore, the actual building height will remain at 28 feet.
2
Date Prepared: May 12,2008
Meeting Date: September 9,2008
Petition: MISC-08-04-000042
The tower will feature a standing-seam metal roof, deco outrigger brackets, stucco score lines, and 12-inch flat 0
stucco bands. The tower will be constructed of materials and colors similar to those found in the existing
building, which has dark and light taupe colors. The standing-seam metal roof will be a green color to match
the existing building awnings, which are a “Hemlock Green Tweed.”
Signage
Flatmall Sims
The existing principal tenant sign on the west building elevation is proposed to be relocated to the northwest
side of the new tower, and one additional principal tenant sign is proposed on the southwest side of the tower
in order to provide visibility to motorists traveling both north and south on Interstate 95. The additional sign
will require approval of a waiver because the number of signs exceeds the one principal tenant sign allowed by
City Code.
The two proposed signs will have 20-inch high letters, two lines of copy, and a sign area measuring 54 inches
high by 20 feet long, for a total area of 90 square feet for each sign. The font will be New Times Roman, and
the color will be bronze to match the existing signage.
The existing principal tenant sign on the east building elevation facing Riverside Drive will remain unchanged.
Monument Sims
The project was approved for a monument sign that was setback approximately 60 feet from the Riverside
Drive right-of-way. The previously approved monument sign was never constructed and the applicant has
requested to relocate the sign closer to the right-of-way. The proposed monument will cause the relocation of
one existing oak tree. The proposed location requires a waiver from the minimum 15-setback required by Code
(please see waiver section).
0
Landscaping
The original approved landscape plan provided 4,429 landscape points. Several palm trees and shrubs will be
relocated on-site, to the satisfaction of the City Forester, in order to accommodate the new tower element, but
no landscape points will be lost. Furthermore, the minimum required open space of 28% will remain
unchanged.
Parking
The previously approved site plan provided 87 parking spaces. The original parking requirements were based
on the site operating as an industrial use. The parking requirements for the industrial use were 1 space per
1,000 square feet, plus 1 space per employee. The applicant has requested that the parking requirements be
modified to reflect the actual use that is currently operating in the building today. The applicant states that
Decorator’s Unlimited is functioning as a general wholesale use with ancillary office use. The applicant has
provided sufficient information to justify the change of use to staff. The parking requirements for general
wholesale uses are 1 space per 2,000 square feet of wholesale plus 1 space per 250 square feet of an ancillary
office. Thus, the proposed site plan provides 72 spaces and is consistent with the City’s parking requirements.
Because the architectural tower element is not designed for human occupancy, no additional parking spaces
will be required.
3
Date Prepared: May 12,2008
Meeting Date: September 9,2008
Petition: MISC-08-04-000042
With this request, the applicant is requesting approval of minor site plan modifications to the parking area in
order to incorporate a truck maneuvering apron into the design of the parking lot, while maintaining the
e
minimum open space requirement.
Waivers
Code Criteria
Number of
signs
feet from the
Signs
Proposed
- Relocate an
existing principal
tenant sign to the
northwest side of
tower.
- Display one
additional
principal tenant
wall sign on the
southwest side of
tower. - 11 feet
Waiver
To allow one
additional sign to
be displayed on
the southwest
side of tower.
4 feet
Staff
Recomrnenda tion
(1) Denial
(2) Approval
(1) Applicant’s Justification - “At the time the site was originally developed and until around 2005, the
building was clearly visible from Interstate 95. This visibility was one of the primary factors for the
applicant’s decision to purchase the property and was a major determining factor in the valuation of
the parcel. The applicant has had a sign reading “Decorators Unlimited” facing the 1-95 right-of-way
for over 10 years. However, with the recent widening and reconstruction of 1-95, the site has lost all
visibility from the highway and now sits in a “hole” with respect to the height of the adjacent roadway.
“The loss of visibility from 1-95 significantly damages the value of the property and presents an undue
burden on the property owner whose business now has no identification along its primary frontage.
Accordingly, the property owner is compelled to make a substantial investment in the property to
construct improvements that will recapture the lost visibility along the Interstate.
“The proposed additional sign allows for the tower feature to be lower in height and proportional to
the building. If the tower feature included only one sign at a 90-degree angle to the building, it would
need to be taller to capture the line of sight of vehicles traveling past the site in the southbound
4
Date Prepared: May 12,2008
Meeting Date: September 9,2008
Petition: MISC-08-04-000042
direction at 55+ miles per hour. From a design standpoint, the angling of the tower and request for
one sign on each fagade facing 1-95 allows the tower to be lower and more proportionate to the
building.” (Please see applicant’s “Project Narrative” attached)
Staff Analysis - Staff recommends denial of the previously-approved principal tenant sign on the west
elevation being relocated to the top of the new tower element. Furthermore, staff does not support a
second sign to be displayed on the tower. Because both of the proposed signs will be displayed on the
tower at 90-degree right angles, they will be visible at the same time, or from one vantage point, on
Interstate 95. This will give the appearance of a much larger 180-square-foot sign, which is double the
90 maximum square feet allowed by City Code.
The applicant has submitted photographs of other buildings along 1-95 that have signs on two or more
facades. Although the examples submitted are somewhat similar to those proposed with this
application, none is actually located on a small tower feature. In staff’s professional opinion, the
display of more than one sign for the same tenant on multiple elevations, which are visible at the same
time, is redundant and unnecessary, and is intended only to increase the impact of the message or
name. This constitutes a form of advertising instead of a means of way-finding to the building. The
fact that such signs may have been approved in the past should not be considered a basis for additional
approvals. Stafldoes not support this waiver request.
Applicant’s Justification: “The approved location is infeasible based on a lack of visibility from the
right-of-way to the sign due to (1) the sign location’s approximately 60-foot distance from the street
and, (2) the existence of a substantial amount of mature vegetation along the Riverside Drive frontage
of the property. Further, the approved monument sign location conflicts with existing FPL facilities
and an FPL easement that services the property.”
Staff Analysis: Staff recommends approval of the requested waiver and believes the Applicant has
demonstrated adequate justification to support the waiver. Staff has met with the Applicant on-site and
has determined that the proposed location of the monument sign is the minimum necessary to allow
adequate visibility to passer-bys for the sign.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
(2)
0
0
Staff recommends DENIAL of the request to display one additional wall sign on the tower and to
relocate the existing principal tenant sign to the tower because the signs would be visible at one time
or from a particular vantage point, thus giving the appearance of a sign at least twice the minimum 90
square feet allowed by City Code.
Staff recommends APPROVAL of the waiver to allow for the non-residential monument sign to be
located 1 1 -feet from the Riverside Drive right-of-way with the following conditions:
The Oak tree indicated on the plan as being relocated to make room for the monument sign shall not
be moved unless a permit is obtained for the ground sign.
Upon completion of the installation of the monument sign, no removal of existing landscaping near the
sign shall be permitted.
Within 90 days from the date of approval, the Applicant shall complete the changes as indicated on the
site plan to restore the open space.
5
.-. c I I I I I I I
\
\ \ \
/ / / /
1 \ \
/ 2
ra
J-
-I- F-
I
-1'
DECORATOR'S UNLIMITED
PROPOSED TOWER FEATURE
LOT a2 - SOUTHPARK
PALM BEACH GARDE
I
. .. , ... i
#
DECORATOR'S UNLIMITED
PROPOSED TOWER FEATURE
LOT a2 - SOUTHPARK
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA
i
r-
--.. - ' [7] - .f .I. "- . - -.
J
e e i r t
' I I I f 11 I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I qlp ! 7J-p I I I I I I I I I ! I
5 E [
0
a
1 I I I I I I I I I + I I I I I
I I L,
-
-
I I
E
DECORATOR'S UNLIMITED
PROPOSED TOWER FEATURE
LOT e2 - SOUTHPARK
PAW BEACH QARDEWO, FLORIDA
.
1 IIY I
1
a DECORATOR'S UNLIMITED
PROPOSED TOWER FEATURE
LOT 02 - SOUTHPARK
PALM BEACH QARDENS, FLORIDA
. e e
..
r ' -1 I I I I I I I I I I I I -J I a
€
r-i II II II II II II II II
II II II
L, J
-
I
I %r
DECORATOR'S UNLIMITED
PROPOSED TOWER FEATURE
LOT 02 - 8OUTHPARK
-...I --ma.. -----..- -a_.--
. . a r-i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I r------
i,i
-T I I I I I I I I bl I I I I I I I I I
I I I I
P
.
DECORATOR'S UNLIMITED
PROPOSED TOWER FUTURE
LOT mO - SOUTHPARK
PALY BEACH QARDECSZI, FLORUA
J' e e . -9
W
31
Y 851 "' a
I c
.
f !
f
I I
RESOLUTION 2,1997
A RESOLUTION OF THE crTy COUNCLL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, APPROVING AN
AMENDMENT TO THE SITE AND SIGN PLAN APPROVED
FOR SOUTH PARK CENTER, LOT 2; PROVIDING FOR
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND, PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has received an application to amend the Site and Sign Plan,
approved by Resolution 148,1996, and subsequently amended by Resolution 68,1996, for South
Park Center, Lot 2 within the NorthCorp Planned Communi@ District; and
WHEREAS. the City‘s Planning and Zoning Department has determined that said
amendment is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, approves an
amendment to the site plan for South Park Center, Lot 2, located within the NorthCorp Planned
Community District, to include changes to the ground signs, wall signs, and the addition of two
directional signs.
SECTION 2, Said amendment shall be consistent with plans filed with the City’s
Planning and Zoning Department as follows:
1.
2.
3.
February 3. 1997, Directional Sign Elevations. Sign Craft.
February 3,1997, Monument Ground Sign Elevation. Sign Craft.
February 3, 1997, West Elevation Flawall Sign, Sign Craft.
SECTIO N 3, Said amendment shall comply with the following condition:
1. The proposed sign color shall be “Matthews Dark Bronze 4 1-3 1 3 .”
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
c
ATTEST:
LINDA V KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK
AE'PfiOVED AS TO LEGAL FORM
AND SUFFICIENCY
VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT
MAYOR RUSSO L., ---
I
/
J
--- VICE MAYOR FURTAD0
COUNCILWOMAN MONROE
COUNCILMAN JABLIN
COUNCILMAN CLARK
-- ---
y/* ---
Resolution 2,1997
Page
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
1- N. MIUTARY TRAIL PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 334lWl698
February 10,1997
Mr. Kenneth Blair
Catalfbmo Companies
4300 Catalfbmo Way
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
Enclosed is a copy of Resolution 2,1997, approving an amendment to the site and sign plan approved
for South Park Center, Lot.
Resolution 2,1997 was approved by the City Council at the Regular Meeting on February 6,1997.
Sincerely,
Cindy H-wey
Deputy City Clerk
Enclosure: As Stated
THE DECORATORS UNLIMITED
ARCHITECTURAL TOWER FEATURE
& MINOR SITE IMPROVEMENTS
PROTECT NARRATIVE
April 9,2008
Revised: July 21,2008
REOUEST
Johnston Group Land Development Consultants, Inc. (”Johnston Group”), on behalf of
South Park Center 11, LLC (”Owner”), respectfully requests approval of a site plan
amendment to allow for certain architectural, site and signage enhancements to the
existing wholesale facility at 4700 Riverside Drive.
PROTECT SIZE & LOCATION
The subject site is comprised of approximately 3.01 acres and is located at 4700
Riverside Drive within the Northcorp Center Planned Community Development (PCD).
The property is situated on the west side of Riverside Drive with prime frontage along
the east side of Interstate 95.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The subject property is located vithin the Planned Comm inity District (PCD) zoning
district and has a Future Land Use designation of Industrial (I). The site is currently
developed with a 55,000 square foot two-story warehouse/office building which is the
corporate headquarters of The Decorators Unlimited. The Decorators Unlimited, a
premier, high-end design firm specializing in the creation of award-winning, luxury
interiors, has occupied the site since development of the parcel in 1996.
At the time the site was originally developed and continuing until around 2005, the
building was clearly visible from Interstate 95. This visibility was one of the primary
factors for the applicant’s decision to purchase the property and was a major
determining factor in the valuation of the parcel. The applicant has had a sign reading
”Decorators Unlimited” facing the 1-95 right-of-way for over 10 years. However, with
the recent widening and reconstruction of 1-95, the site has lost all visibility from the
highway and now sits in a ”hole” with respect to the height of the adjacent roadway.
To determine the exact elevations of both the building and the 1-95 wall, the applicant
engaged the services of Lidberg Land Surveying to conduct a topographic survey of the
The Decorators Unlimited
Project Narrative
Rev. July 21,2008
Page 2 0
improvements. Accordingly, it was determined that the top of the building parapet is
at Elevation 44.17 NGVD (approximately 28 feet above the ground). The top of the 1-95
wall ranges from Elevation 44.41 NGVD (approximately 28.5 feet above ground level) at
the south side of the site to Elevation 40.64 NGVD (approximately 25 feet above the
ground) at the north property line. At best, the top of the parapet wall is only three (3)
feet higher than the top of the 1-95 wall nearest the north property line. However, due
to the height of the wall above the highway surface, the visible sightline of the building
from passersby is completely eliminated.
The loss of visibility from 1-95 significantly damages the value of the property and
presents an undue burden on the property owner whose business now has no
identification along its primary frontage. Accordingly, the property owner is compelled
to make a substantial investment in the property to construct improvements that will
recapture the lost visibility along the interstate.
PROPOSED BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
Decorative Tower Feature 0
This petition is for approval of an amendment to the building plans to include an
architectural tower feature on the west elevation that will enhance the aesthetic
qualities of the structure while providing visibility from Interstate 95.
The proposed tower feature has been designed to be complementary to the architectural
style of the building. The tower will be constructed using materials similar to those
already found in the building architecture and is color coordinated with the existing
building. The walls of the tower will incorporate the tan and taupe colors of the
building, and the standing seam metal roof feature will be green in color to match the
existing building awnings.
As mentioned above, the key to recapturing visibility from 1-95 is to look at the line of
sight from the highway surface on the approach to the building from both directions, as
well as directly adjacent to the building in both directions of travel. Preliminary
concepts for the subject building improvements contemplated a tower that contained
the signage that was parallel to the roadway. However, due to the height of the wall
between the northbound and southbound lanes of travel directly adjacent to the
building, the aforementioned concept produced a tower that was excessively high and
would be disproportionate to the two-story building. Therefore, in order to allow a
reduction in the height of the tower from the original design, the architect has designed
The Decorators Unlimited
Project Narrative
Rev. July 21,2008
Page 3 0
the tower feature so that the second tier of the structure is turned at a 45-degree angle to
the highway. Signage, bronze in color to match the building’s window frames, will be
added on the two (2) facades of the tower that are angled toward northbound (facing
southwest) and southbound (facing northwest) 1-95. Since the elevation (height) of the
highway wall decreases northward of the project site, visibility to the site by
southbound traffic can be re-established without the need for additional height. In fact,
the applicant is confident that this design will be safer than building the tower at a 90-
degree angle since drivers will not be forced to turn their heads sideways to see the sign
while passing at 55+ miles per hour.
Such signage is consistent with other projects previously approved within the City
along the Interstate 95 corridor including the G4S / Wackenhut Corporation, Doubletree
Hotel and Embassy Suites. Each of these buildings, all of which are in the general
vicinity of the subject property, has signage on dual frontages angled toward the
interstate as exemplified in the following photographs:
G4S Wackenhut, 4200 Wackenhut Drive
View ~orn Interstate 95
The Decorators Unlimited
Project Narrative
Rev. July 21,2008
Page 4 0
DoubleTree Hotel, 4431 PGA Boulevard
View from PGA Boulevard
Embassy Suites, 4350 PGA Boulevard
View from Interstate 95
The Decorators Unlimited
Project Narrative
Rev. July 21,2008
Page 5
PROPOSED SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Parking b Landscaping Configuration
During the course of the review of this project, Staff identified a discrepancy in the
parking lot layout between the approved site plan and the existing configuration of the
parking lot. The originally approved site plan included an approximately 80-foot by
18.5-foot landscape area within the parking row along the north property line which
has been removed since the development of the property. The loss of this landscape
area has resulted in a reduction in the amount of open space below the minimum 28%
required by the PCD development order. According to the current property owner, the
original developer of the property removed the landscape island in order to
accommodate the turning movements of delivery trucks in the loading dock areas along
the north side of the building. Due to the size of the trucks that make deliveries to The
Decorators Unlimited building, there continues to be a need for the extra space to allow
sufficient turning area. Therefore, the applicant is hereby requesting a formal approval
of certain site modifications that incorporate a truck maneuvering apron into the design
of the parking lot while maintaining the minimum required 28% open space.
The removal of the landscape island to allow for the truck maneuvering apron results in
a gross loss in open space provided of approximately 1,480 square feet. To regain the
required open space, the applicant proposes to reclassify the use of the building from
Industrial to Wholesale in order to reduce the number of required parking spaces from
the approved 87 spaces down to 72 spaces. The Decorators Unlimited business is a
wholesale use and a parking ratio for wholesale use was not provided for in the Land
Development Regulations at the time of the original site plan approval. Therefore, the
currently approved site plan calculates required parking based on a rate utilized for
Industrial uses. The proposed site plan calculates parking based on the more up-to-date
wholesale ratio contained within the current version of the Land Development
Regulations. The reduction in parking, however, will not create an adverse parking
situation on the property since much of the provided parking remains unused on a
daily basis.
This reduction in the number of parking spaces will allow the applicant to construct a
new landscape area along the south side of the building in a location which has been
observed to have the least utilized parking on the property. The new landscape island
results in a total recapture of the open space lost as a result of the proposed tower
The Decorators Unlimited
Project Narrative
Rev. July 21,2008
Page 6 0
feature and truck maneuvering area.
property will include approximately 28.1% open space.
With the proposed site modifications, the
Monument Sim
The approved site plan includes a monument sign located at the northeast corner of the
building, set back approximately 60 feet from the Riverside Drive right-of-way. This
monument sign was never constructed because heretofore there has not been a
recognized need for any additional project identification along Riverside Drive.
However, due to (1) the significant set back of the approved sign location from the
street, (2) the existing vegetation on the property which has matured significantly since
its installation over 10 years ago and, (3) a conflict between the approved monument
sign location and the existing FPL facilities for the property, the applicant is proposing
to move the monument sign to a centrally located position along the property’s
Riverside Drive frontage. The new monument sign location will require the relocation
of one (1) existing oak tree which is proposed to be moved to a new landscape island
being created in the north parking lot as part of the truck maneuvering area
improvements. Additionally, the new sign location requires a waiver from LDR Sec. 78-
285 which requires a 15-foot setback from the right-of-way. A monument sign detail is
included for approval with the architectural plans submitted herewith and a waiver
request and justification is included below under the ”Requested Waivers” section of
this narrative. We have also enclosed a copy of the utilities easement agreement
executed by both FPL and the property owner to allow the placement of the monument
sign within the FPL easement recorded in Palm Beach County Official Records Book
9536 at Page 865.
REOUESTED WAIVERS
Identification of Requested Waivers
The following is a list of the two (2) waivers that are requested for the project with a
justification for each requested waiver following in italics typeface:
1. The applicant is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78-285 Table 24
Permanent Signs to allow one (1) additional principal tenant identification
sign.
The project currently has one (1) principal tenant identifcation sign along the Riverside
Drive frontage and one (1) principal tenant identification sign along the I-95 frontage.
The Decorators Unlimited
Project Narrative
Rev. July 21,2008
Page 7 0
The principal tenant identification sign along the 1-95fiontage will be moved to the new
tower feature facing southbound traffic. The applicant is requesting approval of one (1)
additional principal tenant identification sign along the 1-95 fiontage that will be placed
on the new tower feature facing northbound traffic. The proposed additional sign allows
for the tower feature to be lower in height and proportional to the building. If the tower
feature included only one sign at a 90-degree angle to the building, it would need to be
taller to capture the line of sight of vehicles traveling past the site in the southbound
direction at 55+ miles per hour. From a design standpoint, the angling of the tower and
request for one (1) sign on each facade facing 1-95 allows the tower to be lower and more
proportionate to the building. From a safety perspective, the angling of the tower and
request for one (1) sign on each facade facing 1-95 increases visibility of the projectfiom a
distance so that drivers will not be distracted while passing by the site at 55+ miles per
hour.
2.
The applicant respectfully requests a waiverfiom Sec. 78-285 Table 24: Permanent Signs
to allow for an additional principal tenant identification sign on the west elevation (tower
feature) of the building to improve building aesthetics and increase visibility for safety
purposes.
The applicant is requesting a waiver from LDR Section 78-285 Table 24
Permanent Signs to allow a reduction in the minimum setback for ground
signs.
The approved site plan currently shows a location for a monument sign at the northeast
corner of the building. However, the approved location is infeasible based on a lack of
visibilityfiom the right-of-way to the sign due to (1) the sign location's approximately
6O-foot distancefiorn the street and, (2) the existence of a substantial amount of mature
vegetation along the Riverside Drive fiontage of the property. Further, the approved
monument sign location conflicts with existing FPL facilities and an FPL easement that
service the property.
In order to provide identification of the project along Riverside Drive, the applicant
respectfully requests the approval of an approximately 4-foot reduction in the required
setback for ground signs so that a single-face monument sign can be constructed in a
centrally located position alonq Riverside Drive that will be visible to vassers-bu. " " I J
The Decorators Unlimited
Project Narrative
Rev. July 21,2008
Page 8 e
Compliance with Waiver Criteria
Section 78-158(i) of the City’s LDRs lists criteria, a majority with which all waiver
requests must comply. Below are the aforesaid criteria followed by the applicant’s
demonstration that all of the requested waivers meet the criteria for the granting of a
waiver by the City Council (Note: The demonstration of compliance with the criteria
below is the same for all waivers being requested).
1. The request is consistent with the city’s comprehensive plan.
Demonstration of Comdiance: The requests are consistent with the City’s
Comprehensive Plan.
2. The request is consistent with the purpose and intent of this section.
Demonstration of Compliance: The requests are consistent with the purpose and
intent of the City’s Land Development Regulations.
3. The request is in support of and furthers the city’s goals, objectives, and policies
to establish development possessing architectural significance, pedestrian
amenities and linkages, employment opportunities, reductions in vehicle tips,
and a sense of place.
Demonstration of Compliance: The proposed site, landscape and architectural
design furthers the City’s goals, objectives and policies by enhancing the
architectural significance of the project, establishing pedestrian connections,
enhancing the employment opportunities within the City, and establishing a
destination for residents of the City.
4. The request demonstrates that granting of the waiver will result in a
development that exceeds one or more of the minimum requirements for PUDs.
Demonstration of Compliance: The development exceeds more than one of the
minimum requirements of a PUD including open space and landscape points.
5. The request for one or more waivers results from innovative design in which
other minimum standards are exceeded.
The Decorators Unlimited
Project Narrative
Rev. July 21,2008
Page 9 0
Demonstration of Compliance: The waiver request for the additional principal
tenant identification sign is the result of innovative design implemented to lower
the overall height of the proposed tower feature. The proposed tower has been
placed at a 45-degree angle to the road in an effort to increase the aesthetic
qualities of the building by providing architectural interest and to maintain
proportionality of the tower to the overall building by keeping the tower to the
lowest necessary elevation for visibility of signage from the adjacent highway.
The above criterion is not applicable to the setback waiver being requested. The
setback waiver is being requested based on existing conditions on the site.
Specifically, the existing mature vegetation and location of the existing drive isle
along the front property line of the site preclude the monument sign from being
placed 15 feet back from the property line as required by the City Code, thus
requiring a waiver.
6. The request demonstrates that granting of the waiver will result in preservation
of valuable natural resources, including environmentally-sensitive lands,
drainage and recharge areas, and coastal areas.
Demonstration of Compliance: There are no valuable natural resources on the site.
0
7. The request clearly demonstrates public benefits to be derived, including but not
limited to such benefits as no-cost dedication of rights-of-way, extensions of
pedestrian linkages outside of the project boundaries, preservation of important
natural resources, and use of desirable architectural, building, and site design
techniques.
Demonstration of Compliance: The request demonstrates a public benefit with: (1)
the renovation of the existing building that will be a significant improvement
from the design of the existing structure; and (2) the provision of new landscape
areas that will off-set past reductions in the amount of open space and
landscaping on the property.
8. Sufficient screening and buffering, if required, are provided to screen adjacent
uses from adverse impacts caused by a waiver.
Demonstration qf Compliance: No waivers are being requested that will cause an
adverse impact on adjacent properties however, the site currently contains an
The Decorators Unlimited
Project Narrative
Rev. July 21,2008
Page 10 0
abundance of existing vegetation that will continue to screen the site from
adjacent uses.
9. The request is not based solely or predominantly on economic reasons.
Demonstration of Comzdiance: The requests are not based on economic factors.
10. The request will be compatible with existing and potential land uses adjacent to
the development site.
Demonstration of Compliance: The proposed architectural, site and landscape
design has been designed to be compatible with the existing and potential land
uses adjacent to the site.
11. The request demonstrates the development will be in harmony with the general
purpose and intent of this section, and that such waiver or waivers will not be
injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public health,
safety, and welfare.
Demonstration of Compliance: The requested waivers demonstrate that (1) the
development will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the City’s LDRs;
and (2) the waivers will certainly not be injurious to the area or detrimental to
the public health, safety and welfare.
CLOSING
The applicant has been unduly burdened with the recent construction of the Interstate
95 wall in the fact that it has lost all visibility to its signage and visibility along the
interstate. Visibility and signage were the primary reasons for purchasing and
developing the property and locating the applicant’s business to this location. The
applicant is willing to expend considerable resources in order to upgrade the aesthetics
of the building while bringing back the visibility that it expected to keep in perpetuity
during the initial development of the property. Further, the proposed site
improvements will ease the maneuverability of trucks delivering products to the
warehouse facility while maintaining the minimum required amount of open space on
the property. The proposed monument sign location along Riverside Drive will
provide much-needed project identification for the way-finding of clients and deliveries
coming to The Decorators Unlimited business. Accordingly, the applicant respectfully
requests approval of the subject petition.
April 11, 1996
RESOLUTION 68,1996
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE
APPROVED SITE PLAN FOR LOT 2 OF SOUTH PARK CENTER
PLAT W [THIN THE NORTHCORP CENTER PCD
WHEREAS, the City has received an application to amend the Site Plan approved by
Resolution 48, 1996 for a one-story, 47,000 square foot building located on Lot 2, consisting of
3 009 acres and 0.1506 acres of Lot 3, of South Park Center Plat within the NorthCorp Planned
Community District; and
WHEREAS, the amendment is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the revised Site Plan is consistent with the City’s Land Development
Regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA
SECTION 1. Tke City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, approves a Site
Plan for construction of a one-story, 45,309 square-foot building located on Lot 2 of South Park
Center Plat within the NorthCorp Planned Community District
SECTION 2. Said construction shall be consistent with plans on file with the City’s Planning
and Zoning Department as follows.
1.
2
3
4
5.
6
7.
8.
April 11, 1996 Site Plan by Lidberg Land Surveying, Inc. 1 Sheet
April 1 1,1996 Planting Plan LA-1 by Junson, Inc 1 Sheet
April 11, 1996, Landscape Legend LA-2 by Junson, Inc. 1 Sheet
April 9, 1996 Exterior Elevations 1 by Architectural Design Associates 1 Sheet.
November 29, 1995 Roof Plan 4 by Architectural Design Associates. 1 Sheet
September 18, 1995 Electrical Site Plan E-1 by Electrical Design and Engineering,
Inc. 1 Sheet.
September 25, 1995 Site Plan A, B and C by Sign Craft 3 Sheets
August 14. 1995 Replat by Lidberg Land Suweying, Inc 1 Sheet
SECTION 3, The Site Plan herein granted shall comply with the following conditions:
1.
2
3
4.
5.
6
7
8
9
10.
The construction of Riverside Drive (a k a. West Park Drive) as a two-lane section as
well as single northbound, southbound, eastbound and westbound left-turn lanes at the
intersection of Bums Road and Riverside Drive shall be completed and opened to the
public prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy.
The conauction of the extension of NorthCorp Parkway in a two-lane section easterly
to its proposed terminus at East Park Drive shall be completed and opened to the public
prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy
Existing FP&L easements shall be abandoned and replaced with a IO-foot Utility
Easement adjacent to the property line and on the property, not to be encumbered with
landscaping, prior to the issuance of any building permits on Lot 2
The lighting of the parking lot pavement shall provide a minimum maintained horizontal
foot candles of 0 6 and an average overall of 1 .O in the general parking and pedestrian
areas, certif ed to by the engineer-of-record as being provided by the lighting plan, prior
to the issuance of any building permits
Prior to the issuance ofthe certificate of occupancy, the developer shall coordinate with
the Police Department on the acceptability of the placement of landscaping in proximity
to the lighting.
The Construction Plans for Lot 2 shall provide onehalf inch of on-site dry pretreatment
prior to discharge into the master surface water management system by the use of an - e underground &Itration trench system
The traffic impact fees generated by the development of Lot 2 shall be designated by the
Building Ofticial to be placed in Palm Beach County's account €or the widening of
Bums Road.
AI1 roof-mounted equipment shall be screened line of sight, 6om the ground using
materials compatible with the buildings Items on the roof shall not exceed 5'-6" in
height fiom the roof line Ground equipment shall be screened with like landscaping
required around the dumpster enclosure as depicted on the petitioner's site plan
Office space use shall be limited to 25 percent of the 45,309 square-foot industrial
building. With any major change of occupancy, the property owner shall provide
evidence that this item is in compliance for the entire building prior to issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy.
A drainage easement, to dedicate and establish maintenance responsibility for the
existing storm drainage outfall pipe south of the north property line, shall be prepared.
reviewed by the City Engineer, and recorded prior to the issuance of the first building
bermit for the Droiect
In addition, Assistant City Engineer LyMette Laming recommends the following conditions
11. The inlet at the north entrance of the project'on West Park Drive shall be detailed on
construction plans.
The loading area on the south side of the building is to be used only by small delivery
trucks less than 25' in length.
The construction plans will need to show Type "D" curb as "typical" around hkap
areas per LDR 153.17(c).
14. The construction plans shall indicate correct dimensions, alignment and striping of the
adjacent roadway, West Park Drive
0
12
13
15. The constniction plans shall indicate 5' interior sidewalks.
16. The constniction plans shall address water quality for the stonnwater that will collect
in the truckwells
17 Final collStNCtion plans shall show the hits of the swale area. The swale area cannot
conflict with the landscape plans.
18 Strike preserve area
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption
INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS E%F
I&W@-JOSEPH R. RUSSO
ATTEST: /'
LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK APPROVED As TO FORM AND LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY
VOTE AYE NAY ABSENT
v, MAYOR RUSSO --- VICE MAYOR FURTADO L-- COUNCILWOMAN MONROE J
J COUNCILMAN JABLIN --- J COUNCILMAN CLARK ---
..
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS 0
loso0 N. MILITARY TRAIL PALM BEACH GARDENS, -IDA 3341-
April 19,1996
Mr. JdTLis
1540LathamRoad
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
Dear Mr. Lis:
Endosed is a wpy of Resohrtioa 68,1996, amend& the approved site plan br Lot 2 of South Park
Center Plat within the NorthcMp Center PCD.
Resolution 68,1996 was approved a! the City Council Regular meeting on April 18,1996.
Sincerely,
Deputy City Clerk
Enclosure: Asstated
RESOLUTION 48,1996
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, APPROVING A SITE
BUILDING LOCATED ON LOT 2 OF SOUTH PARK CENTER
PLAT WlTHlN THE NORTHCORP CENTER PCD.
PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ONE-STORY,
WHEREAS, the City has received an application for approval of a Site Plan for a one-
story, 47,000 square foot building located on Lot 2 of South Park Center Plat withim the
NorthCorp Planned Community District; and
WHEREAS, the City's Planning and Zoning Department has determined that said
approval is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City's Planning and Zoning Department has further dekrmined that said
Site Plan is consistent with the City's Land Development Regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA: 9
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, approves a
Site Plan for ConstrUCrion of a one-story, 47,000 square foot building located on Lot 2 of South
Park Center Plat within the NorthCorp Planned Community District.
SECTION 2. Said construction shall be consistent with plans on file with the City's
1. March 13,1996 Site Plan by Lidberg Land Surveying, Inc. 1 Sheet.
2. February 12,1996 Plankg Plan LA-1 by Junson, Inc. 1 Sheet.
3. February 12,1996, Landscape Legend LA-2 by Junson, Inc. 1 Sheet.
4. March 15,1996 Exterior Elevations 1 by Architectural Design Associates.
5. November 29,1995 Roof Plan 4 by Architectural Design Associates. 1 Sheet.
6. September 18,1995 Electrical Site Plan E-1 by Electrical Design and Engineering,
7. September 25,1995 Site Plan A, B and C by Sign Craft. 3 Sheets.
8. February 16,1996 Replat by Lidberg Land Surveying, Inc. 1 Sheet.
Planning and Zoning Department as follows:
1 Sheet.
Inc. 1 Sheet.
SECTION 3. The Site Plan herein granted shall comply with the following conditions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
The construction of Riverside Drive (a.k.a. West Park Drive) as a two-lane section
as well as single northbound, southbound, eastbound and westbound left-turn
lanes at the intersection of Burns Road and Riverside Drive shall be completed
and opened to the public prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy.
The construction of the extension of NorthCorp Parkway in a two-lane section
easterly to its proposed terminus at East Park Drive shall be completed and
opened to the public prior to the issuance of any certificates of ocoupancy.
Existing FP&L easements shall be abandoned and replaced with a 10-foot Utility
Easement adjacent to the property line and on the prom, not to be encumbered
with landscaping, prior to the issuance of any building permits on Lot 2.
The lighting of the parking lot pavement shall provide a minimum maintained
horizontal foot candles of 0.6 and an average overall of 1 .O in the general parking
and pedestrian areas, certified to by the engineer-of-record as Wing provided by
the lighting plan, prior to the issuance of any building permits.
Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy, the developer shall coordinate
with the Police Department on the acceptability of the placement of landscaping
in proximity to the lighting.
The Construction Plans for Lot 2 shall provide onehalf inch of on-site dry
pretreatment prior to discharge into the master surface water management system
by the use of an underground exfiltration trench system.
The trafEc impact fees generated by the development of Lot 2 shall be designated
by the Building Official to be placed in Palm Beach County's account for the
widening of Burns Road.
All roof-mounted equipment shall be screened line of sight, hm the ground using
materials compatible with the buildings. Items on the roof shall not cxd 5'4"
in height hm the roof line. Ground equipment shall be scmed with like
landscaping required around the dumpster enclosure as depicted on the
petitioner's site plan.
Office space use shall be limited to7 1 ,750 square feet of the total building. With
any major change of occupancy, the property owner shall provide evidence that
this item is in compliance for the entire building prior to issuance of a Certificate
of occupancy.
A drainage easement, to dedicate and establish maintenance responsibility for the
existing stonn drainage outfall pipe south of the north property line, shall be
prepared, reviewed by the City Engineer, and recorded prior to the issuance of the
first building permit for the project.
A replat of Lots 2 and 3, showing 14.5 feet of Lot 3 added to Lot 2, shall be
approved by Counciland recorded piror to the issuance of any building permits for
Lot 2.
The petitioner shall save the native vegetation along the southern buffer. Prior to
the issuance of the clearing permit, the petitioner shall meet with the City Forester
to designate the protected mas and tag the trees to be relocated per City code.
Prior to the issuance of the building permit, the landscaping plans shall be
modified to reflect the minor change to the west building foundation plantings due
to two proposed sidewalks reflected on the site plan. No net loss of plant material
shall OCCUT.
11.
12.
13.
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS $1
ATTEST
LINDA V. KOSIER, CMC, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL
SUFFICIENCY.
VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT
r/ MAYOR RUSSO ---
VICE MAYOR FURTADO r/--
COUNCEWOMANMONROE - -
COUNCILMAN JABLIN --
COUNCILMAN CLARK --- r/
r/
.*.
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS e
1- N. MIUtARY TRAIL PAW BEACH WDLNI. -IDA u41-
March 25,1996
Mr. Jeff us
CatalfumO
1540 Latham Road
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
Dear Mr. Lis:
Enclosed is a copy of Resolution 48,1996, approving a site plan for the construction of a one-
story, building located on Lot 2 of South Park Center Plat within the Northcorp Center PCD.
Resolution 48,1996 was aped by the City Cuuncil at their Regular Meeting of March 21,
1996.
Sincerely,
Cindy Harvey
Deputy City Clerk
Enclosure: Asstated
J w
January 18, 1990
ORDINANCE 1, 1990
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS,
FLORIDA, MENDING THE CURRENT ZONING FROM M-1,
RESEARCH AND LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO PCO AND PUD ZONING
WITH UNDERLYING ZONING OF M-1, ON ALL LANDS
COMPRISING THE PLATS OF NORTHCORP CENTER, RCA
BOULEVARD CENTER, WEST PARK CENTER AND SOUTH PARK
CENTER (THE ENTIRE LANDS COMPRISING THE FORMER
RCA SITE); AND, PROVIDING THAT SUBSEQUENT APPROVALS
SHALL BE BY RESOLUTION WITHOUT NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION
OF NOTICE BEING REQUIRED; AND, PROVIDING FOR THE
REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN
CONFLICT HEREWITH: AND, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE HEREOF.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The Zoning upon the lands known as "The Former
RCA SiteY located within the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and
more particularly described in Exhibit "A* attached hereto and made a
part hereof 1s hereby amended from M-1, Research and Light Industrial
Park District, to PCD. The underlying zoning shall be and the same is
hereby designated as that set forth in the M-1, Research and Light
Industrial Park District, City of Palm Beach Gardens Zoning Code.
Sectlon 2. Attached hereto as Composite Exhibit rB* and
made a part hereof are plats prepared by Hutcheon Engineers as
follows: Plat of NorthCorp Center, Plat of RCA Boulevard Center: Plat
of West Park Center and Plat of South Park Center.
The PCD consisting of the aforesaid descrlbed plats (Former
RCA Site) heretofore approved by the City, shall be developed In
accordance with the said plats, the Development Orders and Conditions
of approval entered and approved by the City on January 18, 1990.
Further, each lot within the foregoing plats is hereby designated as a
Planned Unit Development and the Individuals Planned Unit Developments
are hereby created.
Section 3. Impact fees shall be paid by the developers of
the individual Planned Unit Developments as set forth In any appli-'
cable ordlnance, law rule or regulation of any governmental body with
jurisdiction over the property development. a
Section 4. Development of the individual Planned Unlt
Devlopments within the Planned Comnunity District shall proceed in
accordance with the said Development Orders and Condltions of Approval
of January 18, 1990 attached to the Plat of West Park Center and the
Plat of South Park Center; and the general conditlons as hereinafter
setforth:
1. Maximum floor area ratio (FAR) on the overall PCD project
shall not exceed 38%.
2. Winlmum front yard setback for all buildings shall be:
A. 25' for a one (1) or two (2) story, or 25' high struc-
ture.
8. An additional one (1) foot setback for each three (3)
additional feet of building height above 25'.
3. Height restrictions:
Lots 4 & 13 (South Park Center) 6 stories
Lots 1 & 2 (RCA Blvd. Center) 8 storles
Northcorp Center Site & Lots
5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 10 stories (South Park Center)
Lot 1
Lots 1
Lot 12
(West Park Center) 6
(South Park Center
(South Park Center)
9 2, 3 12 stories
no development
perm1 tted
unless site is
canpatable to
use of parcels
8,9, and 10, as
approved by the
City Council.
4. Minimum Open Space* requirements: - Storles
1-4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Open Space
28.0%
28.5%
29.0%
29.5%
30.0%
31.25%
32.50%
33.75%
35.0%
*Open Space is defined as living plant material, water, and
5. A. Antennas and microwave dishes shall be subjected to speciflc
PUD review for screenlng.
6. All roof-mounted equipment shall be totally screened.
6. The uses as outllned in Condition 21 shall be limited to 5% of
the total approved square footage for the PCD and at any time
during the development, no more than 10% shall be allowed.
7. No retail or commercial on the first 250' north of Burns Road.
-2-
landscaped plazas, as determined by the City Council.
8. A 30-foot wide landscape buffer along Burns Road with a berm
average three feet in height and planting.
9. Lot coverage (structures) shall not exceed 40% of the Site area for a two (2) story building and shall be decreased by 2.5%
for each additlonal floor of height above two stories (Example:
10 stortes; 50 - 8 (2.5) = 20%).
Alternate A-1-A, shall be constructed or bonded by the property
owner prlor to flnal plat approval.
Beach County Traffic Impact Ordinance.
determine comnunity facilities impact fees and the timing of
papent for:
A. Recreation B. Police
C. Fire
Property owner prior to the first building permit being issued wlthin the PCD, shall pay $75,000 for comnunity impact, which amount
shall be credited against any future police and fire impact fees
assessed against any development within the PCD.
13. The Property Owner of successors must comply wtth the DER
consent order.
14. Bullding floors will be protected from the 100 year - 3 day,
zero discharge storm event. Roadways will be protected from
the 10 year - 1 day storm event. Parking lots will be pro-
tected from the 3 year - 1 day storm event.
applicant will provide the size and location of the culverts along Burns Road and 1-95, and provide for any off-site drainage.
16. The stormwater run-off from RCA Boulevard wlll need to be
directed into the on-site stormwater management system in
the flnal design.
17. The off-site drainage ditches that serve the project will need
to ba cleaned of debrls, vegetation, and backfill prior to
issuance of the first building permit, on any parcel except
the Northcorp Center site.
replaced prior to issuance of the first building permit, on
any parcel except the Northcorp Center site,
retention area on the West side of the project if required
10. A 7' pathway (east/west) along Burns Road, from 1-95 to
11. Trafflc impact fees must be paid in accordance with the Palm
12. City Council, in conjunction with the Developer(s), shall
15. Prior to the final surface water management calculations,
18. The existing corrugated aluminum weir (riser) will need to be
19. The littoral Planting shall be installed along the water
by S.F.W.M.D.
20. The Property Owner wlll continue a uniform streetscape con- tinuity along all R.0.W. A streetscape/buffer plan for this PCD shall be presented to the City Council for approval by
subsequent resolution prior to the issuance of approval of the
f 1 rs t PUD.
-3-
21. The following are uses allowed with the submission of each PUD, in addition to Industrial and offlce and other M-1 uses:
(Please see Condltion 6 for clarity)
1. Retail:
Wearing Apparel
Toys
Sundries
Jewelry
Camera / P ho tos
Florist
Gift Shop Delicatessen
Bakery
Office Equipment
Food and Drug Sales (each food or drug store shall be
limlted to a maximum of 5,000 sq. ft.)
2. Service Establishments:
BarberlBeauty Shop
Shoe Repair
Laundry/Dry C1 eaner Print Shop
Travel AGency
Empl oymen t Off i ce Restaurant
Health Club
a maximum of 120 guest roms or suites or combination of rooms and suites.
4. Art Gallary, Museum, Dance, Art or Music Studio.
5. Retail sale of beer and wine if in conjunctlon with
restaurant or convenience store.
6. Day Care Center.
7. Bar/Llquor Store, when approved by Resolution of the
City Counci 1.
8. Laundromat
3. Hotel/Motel - One allowed in the project, llmited to a
9. car Wash
10. Fraternal Organization
11. Comnercial Recreation including ancillary driving ranges.
22, Kahart Pinder's conditions from his letter dated 1-8-90, and
recomnendatlon 1-18-90, as follows:
I. Plats of West Park Center and Plats of South Park Center
1. The maximum trip generation for new constructlon approved In the Plat of West Park Center together wlth
the development approved In the Plat of RCA Boulevard
Center and In the Plat of South Park Center, shall not exceed six thousand sixty-three (6,063) daily trlps,
or nine hundred sixty-two (962) PM peak hour trips
("Maximum Daily Trips" and "Maxlmum PM Peak Hour Trips",
respectively).
2. Any applicant appearing before the Planning and Zoning
Comnission and the City Council shall provide a calculation of the daily and peak hour trips associated
with the proposed project. A calculation of the daily
and PM peak hour trlps shall be undertaken utllizlng the
Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) "Trip Generation'', Fourth Edition.
-4-
11. Plat of West Park Center
Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any
buildlng for any land use in Lot 1, Plat of West Park
Center, the construction contract shall have been let for
the followlng road improvement and open to the public
prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy on
said Lot 1:
(a) Addition of one (1) eastbound, left-turn lane to provide dual left-turn lanes at the intersection of
RCA Boulevard and Alternate A-1-A.
111. Plat of South Park Center
Prior to the issuance of buildlng permits and/or cer-
tificates of occupancy for any building on certain lots
within the Plat of South Park Center as more fully detailed
below, certaln road improvements shall be under contract
and/or complete and open to the public as follows:
(a) Prior to the issuance of any bullding permits for any land uses on Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7, the Contract let for construction of West Park Drive as a two lane
as well as single northbound, southbound, eastbound and westbound left-turn lanes at the intersection of
Burns Road with Riverside Drive/West Park Drive.
(b) Prlor to the Issuance of any bullding permits for any land uses on Lots 7, 8, Or 9, the Contract let for
construction of the extension of NorthCorp Parkway
In a two lane sectlon easterly to its proposed
terminus at East Park Drive. These improvements shall be complete and open to the public prior to the
ISSUanCt of any certificates of occupancy for land uses on the foregoing Lots 7, 8, and 9.
Prior to the Issuance of any building permits for any
land uses on Lots 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, or 13, the
Contract let for construction of East Park Drive in a two lane section includlng one addltional westbound
right-turn lane as well as single eastbound and
southbound left-turn lanes at the intersection of
Burns Road and East Park Drive. These Improvements
shall be complete and open to the publlc prior to
issuance of any certlficates of occupancy for land uses on the foregoing Lots 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, or
13.
(d) Prior to the issuance of any buildlng permits or series of building permits for any land uses generating more than three thousand, flve hundred sixty-nine (3,569) daily trlps or five hundred
sixty-slx (566) PM peak hour trips for any uses on
the presently undeveloped lots in the Plat of RCA
Boulevard Center, the Plat of West Park Center and
the Plat of South Park Center: Contract let for construction of one eastbound right-turn lane at
the intersection of Burns Road and Alternate A-1-A,
together with an extension of the storage lane for
the single left-turn lane, and one westbound right-
turn lane at the intersection of Burns Road and
Military Trail. These improvements shall be complete and open to the public prior to issuance of any certificates of occupancy for any land uses generating more than three thousand five hundred
sixty-nine (3,569) daily trips or five hundred sixty- six (566) PM peak hour trips from the undeveloped
lots in the above referenced plats.
-5-
(e) Prior to the Issuance of any buildlng permits for any
undeveloped lots In the Plat of South Park Center, the contract shall be let for installation of a traffic
signal at the Burns Road and Rlverslde DrlVe/WeSt Park Drive intersectlon including a1 1 appropriate
pavement markings, signlng, llghtlng and the like as
approved by Palm Beach County, if warranted.
IV. All parcels wlthln the Plat of South Park Center, shall
provide a signal warrant study to detennlne if slgnaliza- tion Is required at the Intersection of Burns Road with
Riverside Drive/West Park Drive. The signal warrant study
shall be based on a tlme frame colncldent wlth the build-
out of all development wlth the Plat of South Park Center,
the Plat of West Park Center and the Plat of RCA Boulevard
Center and shall Include the total traffic generated by all
previously approved projects In the Plat of RCA Boulevard
Center, the Plat of West Park Center and the Plat of South
Park Center as well as traffic generated by those approved
projects included in the trafflc study for these plats.
Only the construction of the eastbound right-turn lanes at the Burns Road/Al ternate A-1-A lntersectlon and the west-
bound rlght-turn lane at the Burns Road/Military Trall
Intersection shall be consldered off-site improvements.
All other improvements are slte related.
Additlonal RIght of Way Dedlcation
In addition to the right-of-way dedicated on the PLAT of SWTH
PARK CENTER, the Developer, prlor to plat recordation, shall
dedicate such additional rlght-of-way as may be required for the reconstructlon of the intersection of Burns Road with A1 ternate
A-1-A generalty descrlbed as a maximum of an additional 35 feet
beginnlng at the Intersectlon for a distance of 400 feet west of the intersectlon with a taper to 0 feet at a polnt approxima-
tely 830 feet west of the intersection. Provlded, however, once
plans are approved for the intersectlon. should any rlght- of-way which Is conveyed not be required for construction of the
intersection, any excess land shall be imnedlately reconveyed
to the property owner or his successors and assigns.
23. Prior to the submlttal of each PUD appllcatlon the Petitioner
or agent will meet on site with the Clty Forester to review the
site conditions which the City forester wlshes to be addressed
in the site plan.
24. Slte Plan Revlew/PUD - No land clearfng or tree removal be allowed without written approval of the Clty Forester. In
addition, pursuant to the PCD Plan, the Owners of the properties
may deslgnate and develop areas not subject to PUD review and approval, only upon field Inspectlon and wrltten approval of the
Clty Forester. As part of the appllcatlon for each PUD approval, the fol1Owing shall be submi tted:
(a) Tree survey and tree analysis prepared by a registered landscape architect or slmi larly qual ified professional,
which for trees with a caliber of three inches or more describes type of tree, location, caliber, and whether it wlll be removed, replaced, or relocated.
(b) All existing Oak trees with a callber of eight inches or greater wlll be preserved and protected during construction.
-6-
25, The Property Owner agrees and is obligated to include or cause to be included the property ("Property") In any unit of develop-
ment, special distrlct, cmunity development district or local unit of special purpose government created by a duly constituted
governmental entlty ("Specla1 District*) for the purpose of
plannl ng , establi shing , acqui rlng , constructing, reconstruct1 ng ,
enlarging, extending, equipping, operating, or maintaining water
management or roads and assoclated facilities, benefiting the Property and all or part of the City of Palm Beach Gardens,
Florida; provided, however, that a1 1 assessments for such facilities shall be imposed on a unlform basis applied pro-rata
to all property benefited by the Special District (i.e., acre by acre or residence by residence) and shall be determined In accordance with the applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regu-
lations of the State of Florida, County of Palm Beach and the
City of Palm Beach Gardens. Provided further, that upon
creation of any Special District it must be demonstrated by
the Speclal District that direct beneflt is accrued to the
Property and the direct benefit to the Property as determlned
by the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida, and any
costs incurred by the Property by reason of other sections of
this requirements shall be credited to the Property by such
Special Dlstrict. The owners of the Property shall be given not less than 120 days prior written notice before formation of any
Speclal District and shall be entitled to participate In all
proceedings relatlng to the Special District Includlng the right
to appeal any determination of benefit to the Property,
26, Prior to recording a Final Plat, 50% of the Cost of construction of an at grade pedestrian crossing and Slgnalizatlon at the
Comnunity Center on Burns Road, must be paid to the City.
27. A Helipad shall be a permitted use In this PCD.
Section 5. Review of subsequent developments on the individual
PUDs shall be by the City's Planning and Zonlng Comnission and by the
City Councll, and approval shall be by Resolution. A Public Hearing and
publication of notice In a newspaper of general clrculation for the
meetings on subsequent Resolutlons shall not be requtred.
Section 6. If any part or portion of this Ordinance shall be
be invalid by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder found
of the Ordinance shall remain in full force and legal effect.
Section 7. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict
herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 8. This Ordinance shall be effective upon date of
passage.
-7-
PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS 4th DAY OF JANUARY, 1990.
PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS 18th DAY OF JANUARY, 1990.
PLACED AND AD OPrfD THIS 18th DAY OF JANUARY, 1990. - “I
JICE MAYOR
ATTEST:
-8-
Fi
g
’
s
@
Pa
l
m
B
e
a
c
h
G
a
r
d
e
n
s
F
L
Fi
g
’
s
@
Fi
g
’
s
@
Lo
c
a
t
e
d
a
t
T
h
e
G
a
r
d
e
n
s
M
a
l
l
Fi
g
’
s
@
PG
A
B
l
v
d
ma
c
y
’
s
Fi
g
’
s
@
Ap
p
r
o
v
a
l
s
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
TR
E
L
L
I
S
-
m
i
n
o
r
m
o
d
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
s
t
o
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
fa
ç
a
d
e
o
f
M
a
c
y
’
s
t
o
i
n
s
t
a
l
l
a
n
o
n
-
co
r
r
o
s
i
v
e
m
e
t
a
l
t
r
e
l
l
i
s
w
i
t
h
v
i
n
e
s
SI
G
N
–
o
n
e
t
e
n
a
n
t
s
i
g
n
o
n
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
f
a
ç
a
d
e
.
wa
i
v
e
r
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
e
d
f
o
r
s
i
g
n
1.
w
a
l
l
s
i
g
n
w
i
t
h
4
4
.
5
i
n
c
h
l
e
t
t
e
r
s
2.
w
a
l
l
s
i
g
n
a
b
o
v
e
t
h
e
2
nd floor line
Fi
g
’
s
@
CO
N
T
E
X
T
Fi
g
’
s
@
CO
N
T
E
X
T
Fi
g
’
s
@
CO
N
T
E
X
T
Fi
g
’
s
@
CO
N
T
E
X
T
Fi
g
’
s
@
CO
N
T
E
X
T
Fi
g
’
s
@
WE
S
T
F
A
C
A
D
E
Fi
g
’
s
@
WE
S
T
F
A
C
A
D
E
Fi
g
’
s
@
WE
S
T
F
A
C
A
D
E
Fi
g
’
s
@
TR
E
L
L
I
S
Fi
g
’
s
@
TR
E
L
L
I
S
Fi
g
’
s
@
TR
E
L
L
I
S
Fi
g
’
s
@
Pl
a
n
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
NO
P
A
I
N
T
–
w
e
s
t
f
a
c
a
d
e
w
i
l
l
n
o
t
b
e
p
a
i
n
t
e
d
be
h
i
n
d
t
h
e
t
r
e
l
l
i
s
NO
B
O
U
G
A
I
N
V
I
L
L
E
A
–
S
c
h
e
f
f
l
e
r
a
ar
b
o
r
i
c
o
l
a
w
i
l
l
b
e
p
l
a
n
t
e
d
a
l
o
n
g
f
e
n
c
e
in
s
t
e
a
d
Fi
g
’
s
@
Pl
a
n
R
e
v
i
s
i
o
n
s
No
P
a
i
n
t
o
n
w
a
l
l
Sc
h
e
f
f
l
e
r
a
a
r
b
o
r
i
c
o
l
a
he
d
g
e
a
l
o
n
g
f
e
n
c
e
Fi
g
’
s
@
TR
E
L
L
I
S
Cr
e
e
p
i
n
g
F
i
g
V
i
n
e
o
n
T
r
e
l
l
i
s
-p
l
a
n
t
e
d
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
o
u
t
m
a
l
l
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
-c
l
i
m
b
s
u
p
t
o
4
s
t
o
r
i
e
s
-g
r
o
w
s
i
n
s
u
n
o
r
s
h
a
d
e
-g
o
o
d
w
a
l
l
c
o
v
e
r
-a
l
w
a
y
s
g
r
e
e
n
-r
a
p
i
d
g
r
o
w
e
r
-a
i
d
s
i
n
e
n
e
r
g
y
c
o
n
s
e
r
v
a
t
i
o
n
–
“
g
r
e
e
n
sc
r
e
e
n
”
Fi
g
’
s
@
SI
G
N
E
X
A
M
P
L
E
Me
t
a
l
f
a
c
e
w
i
t
h
p
u
n
c
h
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
a
c
r
y
l
i
c
l
e
t
t
e
r
s
Fi
g
’
s
@
SI
G
N
E
X
A
M
P
L
E
Me
t
a
l
f
a
c
e
w
i
t
h
p
u
n
c
h
t
h
r
o
u
g
h
a
c
r
y
l
i
c
l
e
t
t
e
r
s
Fi
g
’
s
@
SI
G
N
S
C
A
L
E
Fi
g
’
s
@
SI
G
N
S
C
A
L
E
Fi
g
’
s
@
SI
G
N
Fi
g
’
s
@
CO
N
C
U
L
S
I
O
N
Ci
t
y
o
f
P
a
l
m
B
e
a
c
h
G
a
r
d
e
n
s
No
r
t
h
C
o
r
p
P
C
D
:
D
e
c
o
r
a
t
o
r
’
s
U
n
l
i
m
i
t
e
d
MI
S
C
08
04
00
0
0
4
2
MI
S
C
-08
-04
-00
0
0
4
2
Pl
a
n
n
i
n
g
,
Z
o
n
i
n
g
a
n
d
A
p
p
e
a
l
s
B
o
a
r
d
(
P
Z
A
B
)
Se
p
t
e
m
b
e
r
9
,
2
0
0
8
Su
b
j
e
c
t
S
i
t
e
Su
b
j
e
c
t
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
•
T
h
e
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
i
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
g
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
t
h
e
fl
l
i
Su
b
j
e
c
t
Re
q
u
e
s
t
foll
ow
ing
:
1.
A
d
d
i
n
g
a
t
o
w
e
r
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
o
n
t
h
e
w
e
s
t
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
l
t
i
f
i
I
t
t
t
9
5
elev
a
ti
on
fac
ing
Inter
s
tate
95
2.
R
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
m
o
n
u
m
e
n
t
a
n
d
a
s
s
o
c
i
a
t
e
d
di
s
p
l
a
c
e
d
l
a
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
di
s
p
l
a
c
e
d
la
n
d
s
c
a
p
i
n
g
.
3.
U
p
d
a
t
e
p
a
r
k
i
n
g
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
m
e
n
t
t
o
b
e
c
o
n
s
i
s
t
e
n
t
w
i
t
h
cu
r
r
e
n
t
u
s
e
o
f
t
h
e
p
r
o
j
e
c
t
cu
r
r
e
n
t
us
e
of
th
e
pr
o
j
e
c
t
.
Wa
i
v
e
r
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
•
Th
e
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
i
s
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
g
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
tw
o
w
a
i
v
e
r
s
r
e
l
a
t
e
d
t
o
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
.
1.
Pr
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
T
e
n
a
n
t
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
:
•
Ea
c
h
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
s
t
r
u
c
t
u
r
e
i
s
a
l
l
o
w
e
d
a
fl
a
t
/
w
a
l
l
s
i
g
n
.
Th
e
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
s
t
o
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
a
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
t
e
n
a
n
t
s
i
g
n
t
o
t
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
ap
p
r
o
v
e
d
pr
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
te
n
a
n
t
si
g
n
to
th
e
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
to
w
e
r
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
i
n
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
t
o
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
n
g
a
n
ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
t
e
n
a
n
t
s
i
g
n
a
l
s
o
t
o
b
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
d
on
t
h
e
t
o
w
e
r
.
Wa
i
v
e
r
R
e
q
u
e
s
t
s
(
c
o
n
t
’
d
)
2.
M
o
n
u
m
e
n
t
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
–
Th
e
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
s
t
o
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
a
–
Th
e
Ap
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
pr
o
p
o
s
e
s
to
re
l
o
c
a
t
e
a
pr
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
m
o
n
u
m
e
n
t
s
i
g
n
1
1
f
e
e
t
fr
o
m
t
h
e
r
i
ght
-
o
f
-
w
a
y (RO
W
).
g
y(
)
•
C
o
d
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
s
t
h
e
m
o
n
u
m
e
n
t
s
i
g
n
b
e
s
e
t
b
a
c
k
a
mi
n
i
m
u
m
o
f
1
5
f
e
e
t
f
r
o
m
t
h
e
R
O
W
.
Wa
i
v
e
r
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
•
S
e
c
t
i
o
n
7
8
-
1
5
8
,
W
a
i
v
e
r
s
t
o
p
l
a
n
n
e
d
u
n
i
t
de
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
s
o
u
t
l
i
n
e
s
g
u
i
d
e
l
i
n
e
s
f
o
r
ap
p
r
o
v
i
n
g
w
a
i
v
e
r
s
.
–
“
T
h
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
f
o
r
o
n
e
o
r
m
o
r
e
w
a
i
v
e
r
s
r
e
s
u
l
t
s
fr
o
m
i
n
n
o
v
a
t
i
v
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
i
n
w
h
i
c
h
o
t
h
e
r
mi
n
i
m
u
m
s
t
a
n
d
a
r
d
s
a
r
e
e
x
c
e
e
d
e
d
.
”
St
a
f
f
be
l
i
e
v
e
s
t
h
e
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
’s
d
e
s
i
g
n
l
a
c
k
s
be
l
i
e
v
e
s
th
e
Ap
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
s
de
s
i
g
n
la
c
k
s
in
n
o
v
a
t
i
o
n
a
n
d
d
o
e
s
n
o
t
e
n
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
,
b
u
t
o
n
l
y
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
s
a
p
l
a
c
e
f
o
r
t
h
e
ar
c
h
i
t
e
c
t
u
r
e
,
bu
t
on
l
y
pr
o
v
i
d
e
s
a pl
a
c
e
for the
pr
o
p
o
s
e
d
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
t
e
n
a
n
t
s
i
g
n
s
.
Wa
i
v
e
r
C
r
i
t
e
r
i
a
(
c
o
n
t
’
d
)
•
“
T
h
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
i
s
n
o
t
b
a
s
e
d
s
o
l
e
l
y
o
r
pre
d
o
m
i
n
a
n
t
l
y o
n
e
c
o
n
o
m
i
c
r
e
a
s
o
n
s
.
”
py
–
T
h
e
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
h
a
s
s
t
a
t
e
d
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
w
i
d
e
n
i
n
g
an
d
e
l
e
v
a
t
i
n
g o
f
I
-
9
5
h
a
s
s
e
v
e
r
e
l
y d
i
m
i
n
i
s
h
e
d
g
y
th
e
p
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
v
a
l
u
e
.
St
a
f
f
b
e
l
i
e
v
e
s
t
h
a
t
t
h
e
Ap
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
’
s
w
a
i
v
e
r
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
f
o
r
t
h
e
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
o
n
th
t
i
b
d
l
l
i
th
e
tow
e
r
is
bas
e
d s
o
lely
o
n
e
c
o
n
o
m
ic
re
a
s
o
n
s
.
Wa
i
v
e
r
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
•
S
t
a
f
f
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
D
E
N
I
A
L
o
f
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
to
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
t
h
e
p
r
e
v
i
o
u
s
l
y
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
pr
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
t
e
n
a
n
t
s
i
g
n
a
n
d
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
e
s
t
f
o
r
an
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
t
e
n
a
n
t
s
i
g
n
f
o
r
t
h
e
fo
l
l
o
w
i
n
g
r
e
a
s
o
n
s
:
–
T
h
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
o
f
t
h
e
t
o
w
e
r
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
d
o
e
s
n
o
t
en
h
a
n
c
e
t
h
e
a
e
s
t
h
e
t
i
c
s
o
f
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
a
n
d
i
s
di
s
p
r
o
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
a
t
e
t
o
t
h
e
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
h
e
i
g
h
t
.
T
h
e
i
t
i
b
i
l
d
i
i
2
8
’
d
t
h
t
i
2
4
’
ex
isti
ng
buil
d
i
ng
is
28
’
a
n
d th
e
tow
e
r
is 24’.
Wa
i
v
e
r
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
–
T
h
e
p
r
o
p
o
s
e
d
t
o
w
e
r
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
d
o
e
s
n
o
t
c
o
n
t
a
i
n
an
y
h
a
b
i
t
a
b
l
e
s
p
a
c
e
a
n
d
i
s
m
e
r
e
l
y
f
o
r
an
y
ha
b
i
t
a
b
l
e
sp
a
c
e
an
d
is
me
r
e
l
y
fo
r
ad
v
e
r
t
i
s
i
n
g
.
•
T
h
e
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
h
a
s
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
d
o
t
h
e
r
b
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
s
w
i
t
h
si
m
i
l
a
r
s
i
g
n
a
g
e
,
h
o
w
e
v
e
r
,
n
o
n
e
o
f
t
h
e
s
i
g
n
s
a
r
e
lo
c
a
t
e
d
o
n
t
o
w
e
r
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
s
.
•
St
a
f
f
h
a
s
g
i
v
e
n
t
h
e
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
a
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
d
e
s
i
g
n
s
t
o
•
St
a
f
f
ha
s
gi
v
e
n
th
e
Ap
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
de
s
i
g
n
s
to
th
e
t
o
w
e
r
f
e
a
t
u
r
e
t
h
a
t
c
o
u
l
d
c
r
e
a
t
e
a
m
o
r
e
pr
o
p
o
r
t
i
o
n
a
l
f
e
e
l
t
o
t
h
e
t
o
w
e
r
,
b
u
t
t
h
e
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
h
a
s
ch
o
s
e
t
o
p
r
o
c
e
e
d
a
s
s
u
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
.
Wa
i
v
e
r
A
n
a
l
y
s
i
s
•
S
t
a
f
f
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
a
p
p
r
o
v
a
l
o
f
t
h
e
w
a
i
v
e
r
re
que
s
t
t
o
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
e
t
h
e
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g a
pp
roved
qg
p
p
mo
n
u
m
e
n
t
s
i
g
n
4
’
i
n
t
o
t
h
e
r
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
se
t
b
a
c
k
.
–
S
t
a
f
f
b
e
l
i
e
v
e
s
t
h
e
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
h
a
s
p
r
o
v
i
d
e
d
si
gni
f
i
c
a
n
t
jus
t
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
t
o
s
u
pp
or
t
t
h
e
w
a
i
v
e
r
gj
p
p
re
q
u
e
s
t
a
n
d
h
a
s
e
v
e
n
m
e
t
t
h
e
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
n
t
o
n
-
si
t
e
t
o
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
t
h
e
m
o
s
t
s
u
i
t
a
b
l
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
f
o
r
th
i
th
e
s
ign
.
St
a
f
f
R
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
a
t
i
o
n
•
S
t
a
f
f
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
d
s
D
E
N
I
A
L
o
f
t
h
e
w
a
i
v
e
r
re
q
u
e
s
t
s
p
e
r
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
t
o
t
h
e
p
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
t
e
n
a
n
t
re
q
u
e
s
t
s
pe
r
t
a
i
n
i
n
g
to
th
e
pr
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
tenant
si
g
n
s
.
St
f
f
d
A
P
P
R
O
V
A
L
f
t
h
•
St
aff
r
e
c
o
m
m
e
n
ds
AP
P
R
O
V
A
L
o
f th
e
mo
n
u
m
e
n
t
s
i
g
n
r
e
l
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
.