HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Council Agenda 072005
City of Palm Beach Gardens
Special Council
Meeting Agenda
July 20, 2005
Council Chambers
10500 N. Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
Mayor Russo Council Member Levy
Vice Mayor Jablin Council Member Valeche
Council Member Barnett
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
SPECIAL COUNCIL AGENDA
July 20, 2005
7:00 P.M.
I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
II. ROLL CALL
III. ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, MODIFICATIONS:
IV ANNOUNCEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS:
V. ITEMS OF RESIDENT INTEREST:
VI. CITY MANAGER REPORT:
VII. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC: (For Items Not on the Agenda, please submit
request form to the City Clerk prior to this Item)
VIII. CONSENT AGENDA:
IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Part I – Quasi-judicial
a. (Staff Report on Page 5, Ordinance on Page 136, Resolution on Page 141)
Ordinance 18, 2005 - (1st Reading) Approval of an amendment to the Christ
Fellowship North Campus Planned Unit Development (PUD). An Ordinance of
the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida rezoning a parcel of
land consisting of approximately 20 acres, located on the North side of Northlake
Boulevard approximately one mile West of Military Trail, as more particularly
described herein, from Residential Low Density-3 (RL3) to a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) overlay with an underlying zoning designation of
Residential Low Density-3 (RL3), to be included in the Christ Fellowship North
Campus Planned Unit Development (PUD); amending Ordinance 20, 1997 and
Ordinance 23, 1999 relating to the zoning for the Christ Fellowship North
Campus Planned Unit Development (PUD) to transfer the site plan approval and
related conditions to Resolution 83, 2005; amending the zoning district map; and
providing an effective date.
Resolution 83, 2005 is a companion item to Ordinance 18, 2005 and
will require Council action on second reading
Resolution 83, 2005 - Approval of a master development plan for the Christ
Fellowship North Campus PUD. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida approving an amendment to the Christ Fellowship
North campus Planned Unit Development (PUD), located on the North side of
Northlake Boulevard approximately one mile West of Military Trail, as more
particularly described herein, to incorporate an additional 20 acres and to allow
the development of a 159,180-square-foot expansion to the North Campus;
granting conditional use approval for the expanded Christ Fellowship Campus;
amending certain conditions of approval for the North Campus; providing for
waivers; providing for conditions of approval; and providing an effective date.
b. (Staff Report on Page 5, Ordinance on Page 155, Resolution on Page 160)
Ordinance 19, 2005 – (1st Reading) Approval of an amendment to the Conditional
Use approval for the Christ Fellowship South Campus. An Ordinance of the City
Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida amending Ordinance 30,
1990, Ordinance 34, 1999, and Ordinance 51, 1999 relating to the zoning for the
Christ Fellowship South Campus to transfer the conditional use approval and
related conditions to Resolution 84, 2005; and providing an effective date.
Resolution 84, 2005 is a companion item to Ordinance 19, 2005 and
will require Council action on second reading
Resolution 84, 2005 - Approval of an amendment to the Site Plan approval for the
Christ Fellowship South Campus. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida approving an amendment to the Christ Fellowship
South Campus conditional use and site plan approval, located on the South side of
Northlake Boulevard approximately one mile West of Military Trail, as more
particularly described herein, to allow for the deletion of a condition of approval;
and providing an effective date.
Part II – Non-Quasi-judicial
X. RESOLUTIONS:
XI ORDINANCES: (For Consideration on First Reading)
XII. ITEMS FOR COUNCIL ACTION/DISCUSSION:
XIII. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT:
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any interested party wishes to appeal
any decision made by the City Council with respect to any matter considered at this public
hearing, such interested persons will need a record of the proceedings and may need to ensure
that a verbatim record is made, including the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is
to be based.
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 286.26, Florida Statutes,
persons with disabilities needing special accommodations in order to participate in this
proceeding are entitled to the provision of certain assistance at no cost. Please call the City
Clerk’s Office at 561-799-4122 no later than 5 days prior to the hearing if this assistance is
required. For hearing impaired assistance, please call the Florida Relay Service Numbers:
800-955-8771 (TDD) or 800-955-8770 (VOICE).
NOTE:
All presentation materials must be received by
the City Clerk prior to the presentation to the Council.
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS CITY COUNCIL
Agenda Cover Memorandum
Date Prepared: May 19,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance l8,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance l9,2005/Resolution 84,2005
SUBJECT/AGENDA ITEM
ORDINANCE 18,2005 & RESOLUTION 83,2005: CHRIST FELLOWSHIP NORTH CAMPUS PUD
AMENDMENT & CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL
First Reading: A request by Mr. Doug Rhudy of Palm Beach Gardens Christ Fellowship, Inc., for approval
of (1) an amendment to the Christ Fellowship North Campus Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow for
the incorporation of 20 acres of land lying immediately east of the existing North Campus into the PUD to
facilitate the development of a 159,180 square-foot expansion to the North Campus; (2) a Conditional Use
approval for the expanded Christ Fellowship Campus; and (3) the deletion of certain conditions of approval
of the existing North Campus approval. The existing 20-acre North Campus is generally located on the north
side of Northlake Boulevard approximately one (1) mile west of Military Trail at 5343 Northlake Boulevard.
ORDINANCE 19, 2005 & RESOLUTION 84, 2005: CHRIST FELLOWSHIP SOUTH CAMPUS
CONDITIONAL USE AND SITE PLAN AMENDMENT
First Reading: A request by Mr. Doug Rhudy of Palm Beach Gardens Christ Fellowship, Inc., for
amendments to the site plan and Conditional Use approval for the Christ Fellowship South Campus to allow
for the deletion of certain conditions of approval. The 5.41-acre South Campus is generally located on the
south side of Northlake Boulevard approximately one (1) mile west of Military Trail at 5312 Northlake
Boulevard.
[XI Recommendation to APPROVE with conditions and waivers
[XI Recommendation to DENY certain requests for modifications to conditions of approval
I Reviewedby: I
City Attorney
Finance NIA
Development
AICP
Growth Management
Administrator qd
Charles K. Wu, AICP
Approved By:
Originating Dept:
Manager
Project
Michael J.'S#chez
Planning Manager
[XI Quasi - Judicial
[ ] Legislative
[ ] Public Hearing
Advertised
[ ] Required
[XI Not Required
Affected Parties:
[XI Notified
[ ] Not Required
/
FINANCE: NIA
costs: $3
Total
$N/A
Current FY
Funding Source:
Budget Acct.#:
NtA
Attachments:
Analysis
Conditional Use
Ordinance 20, 1997
Ordinance 23, 1999
Ordinance 30, 1990
Resolution 13, 1991
Resolution 86, 1999
Ordinance 34, 1999
CC Action:
[ ]Approved
[ ] App. w/ conditions
[ ]Denied
[ ] Rec. approval
[ ] Rec. app. w/ conds.
[ ]Rec.Denial
[ ] Continued to:-
Attachments (conk):
Ordinance 5 1, 1999
Resolution 5, 2000
Additional Standards for
Churches
Traffic Concurrency
Approval Letters
Traffic Operation Plan
Drainage Letter
Letter from Applicant
Relating to Uses of New
Buildings
Justification Letter
Emails from Residents
Development Plans
Renderings
Ordinance 18,2005
Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance 19,2005
Resolution 84, 2005
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance 18,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance 19,2005/Resolution 84,2005
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The subject petition involves a request by Christ Fellowship Church (the “Church”) for the
following:
North Campus
1) An amendment to the Christ Fellowship North Campus Planned Unit Development (PUD)
to allow the incorporation of the 20 acres of land lying; immediately east of the existing
North Campus into the PUD to facilitate the development of a 159.180 square-foot
expansion to the North Campus.
(Staffis recommending APPRO VAL of this request with conditions and waivers.)
2) A Conditional Use for the expanded Christ Fellowship North Campus
Churches are allowed in residential zoning districts as Conditional Uses. Staff has
compared the expansion of the existing Christ Fellowship Church against the City’s
Conditional Use criteria found in Section 78-52 of the City’s LDRs and determined that it is
consistent therewith (please see “Conditional Use Analysis ”).
(Staff is recommending APPROVAL of this request.)
3) The deletion of certain conditions of approval for the North Campus
The applicant is requesting the deletion of certain conditions of approval previously imposed
on the North Campus relating to (1) outdoor sound amplification; (2) the number of fixed
seats in the Sanctuary; (3) utilizing other buildings as overflow for sermons conducted in the
Sanctuary; (4) simultaneous broadcasts of sermons conducted in the Sanctuary; and (5) the
number of special events allowed per year (please see “Proposed Deletion of Certain
Conditions of Approval” section of this report for further detail):
(Staff is recommending that three (3) CONDITIONS BE AMENDED and is recommending
DENIAL of the remaining requests to delete certain conditions of approval.)
4) Amendments to the site plan and Conditional Use approval for the Christ Fellowshir, South
Campus to allow for the deletion of certain conditions of approval.
The applicant is requesting the deletion of certain conditions of approval previously imposed
on the South Campus relating to (1) simultaneous broadcasts of sermons to this site; and (2)
the operation of a shuttle bus between the North and South Campus (please see “Proposed
Deletion of Certain Conditions of Approval” section of this report for further detail):
(Staff is recommending APPROVAL of the proposed deletion of one (I) condition and
DENIAL of the proposed deletion of another condition.)
2
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance 18,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance 19,2005/Resolution 84,2005
BACKGROUND
The Christ Fellowship Church Campus is comprised of two (2) sites located opposite each other
along Northlake Boulevard west of Military Trail.
South Campus
The “South Campus” (5.41 acres; south side of Northlake Boulevard) was originally approved as a
conditional use for a 300-seat sanctuary and day-care facility through the adoption of Ordinance 30,
1990. Resolution 13, 1991 provided site plan approval therefor. The adopted ordinance and
resolution were subsequently amended by Resolution 13, 199 1 ; Resolution 4, 1997; Ordinance 34,
1999; Resolution 86, 1999; and Resolution 5,2000 providing for, among other things, an increase in
the number of seats within the sanctuary, temporary modular units, infrastructure improvements,
and further restrictions on the operation of the site. Currently, the maximum number of seats
allowed on the South Campus stands at 576 permanent seats (per Ordinance 34, 1999).
North Campus
The Christ Fellowship North Campus Planned Unit Development (PUD) (19.87 acres; north side of
Northlake Boulevard) (the “North Campus”) was approved through the adoption of Ordinance 20,
1997 providing for the construction of an 85,200 square-foot religious facility comprised of a 1,750-
seat sanctuary and two (2) ancillary buildings (Buildings A and B). The applicant was granted no
waivers as part of the original PUD approval, as the project met all applicable code requirements in
effect at the time. Subsequent amendments to this approval have included five (5) administrative
amendments and an amending ordinance (Ordinance 23, 1999) allowing for minor architectural and
site plan changes to the site and providing further restrictions upon the operation of the site.
Although the City’s LDRs at the time of original approval required churches located within a
residential zoning district to be approved as a Conditional Use, the original development order for
the North Campus was approved only as a PUD with an underlying zoning of Residential Low
Density-3 (RL3). The vacant land upon which the North Campus is located had a Planned
Development Area (PDA) zoning designation prior to the rezoning. At the time of the original PUD
approval, the LDRs required that all lands with a PDA zoning designation rezone to either PUD or a
Planned Community District (PCD). The PUD rezoning was considered to be a sufficient “legal
equivalent” to a Conditional Use by the City staff at the time so as not to also require a separate
Conditional Use approval. Also at that time, there were no additional standards in the LDRs for
churches within a residential zoning district. Thus, churches could be approved as a Conditional
Use within a residential zoning district regardless of the size thereof or number of seats. Upon the
adoption of the current Land Development Regulations in July of 2000, churches with sanctuary
seating in excess of 1,000 seats were restricted to industrial and commercial zoning districts only.
Previouslv Imposed Conditions of Approval
(a) The original conditions of approval
Several conditions of approval were placed on the original approvals of both the South Campus and
the North Campus PUD (the “Campuses”) and subsequent amendments to address neighborhood
concerns that the use was too intense for the residential character of the neighborhood. The limits
3
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance 18,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance 19,2005/Resolution 84,2005
placed upon the operations of the church were expressly intended to preserve the residential
character of the surrounding community. The applicant accepted all conditions at the time of the
original approval of the Campuses, as well as additional conditions placed on subsequent
amendments.
(b) Petition to amend original conditions of approval.
On April 11, 2001, the applicant submitted a petition requesting several amendments to certain
conditions of approval regarding the operational procedures and activities on the Campuses.
During the City Council meetings at which this petition was discussed, it was made known that
Christ Fellowship Church (the “Church”) intended to purchase the 20-acre parcel of land lying
immediately east of the North Campus (the “East 20 Acres”) for expansion of the Church’s
facilities. The petition was last heard at the September 4, 2002, City Council meeting, at which
time the City Council requested that the petition be postponed until such time when the Church
submits a complete development application including the development of the East 20 Acres.
(c) Proposed additional development of East 20 Acres
In January of 2003, the applicant submitted an application for the development of the East 20 Acres;
however, the development plans submitted at that time depicted only building footprints, square
footages, conceptual floor plans, and the layout of the surrounding parking areas and drive isles. No
architectural elevations or final floor plans were provided. It was staffs professional opinion at that
time that the application for the East 20 Acres must include complete site elevation plans in
order to conduct a complete and thorough review of the application. Consequently, in March 2003,
staff brought this issue to a workshop meeting before the City Council. The Council supported
staff’s position that the petition to amend the conditions of approval would not move forward until
such time when a complete development application for the East 20 Acres was brought before the
City Council.
Since that time, the applicant has submitted several revisions to the development plans, traffic
impact analysis and associated documents based on staffs review comments. The application for
the development of the East 20 Acres was reviewed by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board at
a workshop and a public hearing (please see the “Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board” section of
this report) independent of the petition to amend the conditions of approval, as said petition was
previously reviewed by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board (referred to at the time as the
“Planning and Zoning Commission”) at its November 13, 2001 meeting, and the Board
recommended approval of the proposed amendments by a vote of 6-1.
The petition to amend certain conditions of approval on the Campuses and the petition to
allow for the expansion of the North Campus are now being brought together for a
comprehensive review by staff and the City Council. “SECTION 1” of this report will focus
on the proposed amendments to the conditions of approval and staffs analysis and
recommendation thereof. “SECTION 2” of the report will focus on the proposed expansion
and Conditional Use approval of the North Campus.
(The remainder of this page was intentionally left blank.)
4
PROPOSED DELETION OF CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The applicant is requesting the deletion of following conditions of approval previously imposed on
the Campuses (please see attached justification letter from the applicant).
9 (NORTH CAMPUS) Ordinance 20,1997, Condition 9: Sound Amplification
“The owner or successor shall not utilize a loudspeaker, sound amplifier, radio, phonograph, of
similar sound amplifying device to emit any form of sound outside the church sanctuary and
related facilities.”
Applicant’s Request: The applicant has requested that this condition be eliminated.
Staff Analysis: Staffs analysis of the proposed expansion against the City’s Conditional Use
Criteria (please see attached “Conditional Use Analysis ”) concludes that the expansion meets
those criteria based, in part, on the fact that the use utilizes site planning techniques and
business operation procedures (required by the City as conditions of approval) to mitigate
impacts on surrounding properties so that the quality of life of the surrounding residents is not
diminished. This condition was previously imposed by the City to further reduce the impacts of
the use on the surrounding single-family residential neighborhoods. Although the applicant is
required to comply with all applicable noise and decibel requirements set forth in the City’s
Code of Ordinances, the elimination of this condition could conceivably bring forth a variety of
outdoor events on the campus that could cause a further undue burden on the residents of the
surrounding area. Staff recommends DENIAL of the applicant’s request to eliminate Condition
9 of Ordinance 20, 1997.
+:e (NORTH CAMPUS) Ordinance 20,1997, Condition 12: Number of Fixed Seats
“The number of fixed and/or moveable seats within the sanctuary shall at no time exceed
1,750.”
Applicant’s Reuuest: The applicant has requested that this language be eliminated in its entirety.
The applicant has indicated that the restriction on number of seats within the sanctuary has not
limited the capacity of the sanctuary. Many attendees instead stand during services when
seating is not available. The applicant wishes to be able to allow the attendees who would
otherwise stand to sit, by utilizing open areas within the sanctuary for additional seating. The
applicant states that the maximum occupancy in the Sanctuary should be based on the ability of
the site to meet all Code requirements, including parking, traffic concurrency, fire, building and
safety codes. Based only on life safety fire codes, the maximum number of moveable seats
permitted beyond the 1,750 permanent seats would be 534 seats, if approved by the City
Council, bringing the total amount of seats in the sanctuary to 2,284. The site’s traffic
concurrency approval was based on the square footage of the proposed buildings, in accordance
with the standards of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), not the number of seats
within the sanctuary. The proposed site plan contains sufficient parking to allow up to 2,284
seats within the Sanctuary.
5
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance 18,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance 19,2005/Resolution 84,2005
Staff Analysis: Section 78-1 59(j)(49) of the City’s LDRs (attached), entitled Additional
standards (for Churches and Places of Worship), contains standards with which Churches and
Places of Worship must comply. Subsection b. thereof states that such use with more than 1,000
permanent seats or approved capacity may be located as a Conditional Use in commercial and
industrial zoning districts only. At the time that the existing North Campus was approved by the
City, Churches and Places of Worship were permitted in all residential zoning districts as a
Conditional Use regardless of the number of seats. The development order for the existing
North Campus, which is not located within a commercial or industrial zoning district, restricted
the number of seats within the sanctuary to 1,750 seats. Thus, the Church received a legal
development approval from the City allowing for 1,750 seats within the Sanctuary prior to the
LDRs being amended limiting Churches and Places of Worship within residential zoning
districts to 1,000 seats. The use of the Sanctuary Building is considered by the City a legal
nonconforming use of a structure because the number of seats exceeds that allowed for such use
within a residential zoning district by the current requirements of the LDRs.
Section 78-71 6 of the City’s LDRs entitled Nonconforming uses ofstructures or premises, reads
as follows:
Section 78-716. Nonconforming uses of structures or premises.
If a lawful use of a structure or of a structure and premises in combination existing at one
time that is not permissible in the zoning district under the terms of this chapter, the lawful
use may continue so long as it remains otherwise lawful and meets all other land
development regulations, including the standards listed below.
(a) Expansion. An existing structure devoted to a use not permitted by this chapter in the
zoning district in which it is located shall not be enlarged, extended, constructed,
reconstructed, moved, or structurally altered except in changing the use of the structure to a
use permitted in the district in which it is located. A nonconforming structure or
improvement may be expanded if the expansion is consistent with all applicable
requirements of this chapter, subject to approval by the Planning, Zoning, and Appeals
Board .... *****
It is staffs professional opinion that the removal of the seat limitation within the Sanctuary is
inconsistent with the requirements of Section 78-716(a) of the City’s LDRs that nonconforming
uses not be enlarged. The addition of seats that would be allowed by the removal of this
condition would allow for the expansion of a nonconforming use, the Sanctuary, that is directly
contrary to the Code. Staff recommends DENIAL of the applicant’s request to delete Condition
12 of Ordinance 20, 1997.
9 (NORTH CAMPUS) Ordinance 23,1999, Condition 2: Supplemental Seating
“Buildings A and B shall not be used as overflow areas or for supplemental seating for
presentations, programs or sermons conducted in the Sanctuary.”
Amlicant’s Request: The applicant has requested that this language be eliminated in its entirety.
6
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance l8,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance 19,2005/Resolution 84,2005
Staff Analysis: This condition was imposed by the City in order to limit the intensity of the
main use of the Church. Allowing any building on site to be used as overflow or for
supplemental seating for presentations, programs or sermons conducted in the Sanctuary has the
effect of increasing the capacity of the Sanctuary beyond that approved by the City Council.
Based on the analysis presented by staff for the proposed deletion of Condition 12 of Ordinance
20, 1997 (Page 5-6), staff recommends that the CONDITION BE AMENDED, as shown
below, to restrict any building on site fiom being used as overflow or supplemental seating for
presentations, programs or sermons conducted in the Sanctuary.
.. “No buildings on site be used as overflow areas or for supplemental
seating for presentations, programs, or sermons conducted in the Sanctuary. (Planning and
Zoning, Code Enforcement)”
shall
9 (NORTH CAMPUS) Ordinance 23,1999, Condition 3: Simultaneous Broadcasts
“Simultaneous broadcasts of presentations, programs and sermons conducted in the Sanctuary to
any remote location, on-site or off-site, shall be prohibited.”
Applicant’s Request:
entirety.
The applicant has requested that this language be eliminated in its
Staff Analysis: Staff does not have an issue with simultaneous broadcasts of presentations,
programs, and sermons conducted in the Sanctuary to any remote location outside of the North
and South Campuses. However, simultaneous broadcasts of sermons conducted in the
Sanctuary to any other building on the North and South Campus has the effect of increasing the
capacity of the Sanctuary beyond that approved by the City Council. Based on the analysis
presented by staff for the proposed modification to Condition 12 of Ordinance 20, 1997 (page 5-
6), staff recommends that the CONDITION BE AMENDED to read as follows:
“Simultaneous broadcasts of presentations, programs and sermons conducted in the Sanctuary to
any other refffefe location on the North or South Campus- , shall be
prohibited.”
*:* (NORTH CAMPUS) Ordinance 20,1997, Condition 7: Special Events Limited to Six
(6) Per Year
“The church sanctuary and related facilities and surrounding grounds shall be used by members
only for regularly scheduled services, including services on Christmas Day and Easter Day, and
for no more than six (6) additional events per calendar year. The church sanctuary and related
facilities shall not be leased, rented or in any way be made available for use as an auditorium,
theater or similar gathering place for non-member events of any kind. Regularly scheduled
services shall be defined as services occurring on Saturday evening, Sunday morning, and a
mid-week evening.”
Applicant’s Request: The applicant has requested that this condition be eliminated in its
entirety.
7
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance 18,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance 19,2005/Resolution 84,2005
Staff Analysis: Since this condition was imposed on the Church when the North Campus was
approved, the LDRs have been amended to limit the number of special events, as defined in the
LDRs, held at any one (1) location to three (3) per calendar year unless otherwise approved by
the City Council. Staff is requesting that the CONDITION BE AMENDED as follows to
provide consistency with Section 78-1 87 of the City’s LDRs entitled Special events:
“The church sanctuary and related facilities and surrounding grounds shall be used by members
only for regularly scheduled services, including services on Christmas Day and Easter Day, and
for no more than three (3) s-k-@j additional events per calendar year. The church sanctuary and
related facilities shall not be leased, rented or in any way be made available for use as an
auditorium, theater or similar gathering place for non-member events of any kind. Regularly
scheduled services shall be defined as services occurring on Saturday evening, Sunday morning,
and a mid-week evening.”
(SOUTH CAMPUS) Ordinance 34, 1999, Condition 2: Simultaneous Broadcasts
“Simultaneous broadcasts of presentations, programs and sermons conducted at any remote
location to this site shall be prohibited.”
Applicant’s Request: The applicant has requested that this condition be eliminated in its
entirety.
Staff Analysis: Staff does not have an issue with simultaneous broadcasts of presentations,
programs, and sermons conducted in the North Campus Sanctuary to any remote location
outside of the North and South Campuses. However, simultaneous broadcasts of sermons
conducted in the Sanctuary to any other building on the North and South Campus has the effect
of increasing the capacity of the Sanctuary beyond that approved by the City Council and
allowed under the Code’s nonconforming use provisions. Based on the analysis presented by
staff for the proposed modification to Condition 12 of Ordinance 20, 1997 (page 5-6), staff
recommends DENIAL of the proposed deletion of this condition:
e:* (SOUTH CAMPUS) Resolution 5,2000, Condition 1: Shuttle Bus Service
“Immediately upon the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the sanctuary on the
north campus of Christ Fellowship, shuttle bus or any other type of transportation between the
north and south campuses shall cease.”
Applicant’s Request: The applicant has requested that this condition be eliminated in its
entirety.
Staff Analysis: Staff is requesting that the applicant apply to the County to install a traffic light
at the easternmost access point to the North Campus in order to better control traffic flow into
and out of the site and to keep conflicts with traffic along Northlake to a minimum; The
easternmost access point for the North Campus has been designed to line up with the existing
entrance into the South Campus. The addition of the traffic light will facilitate traffic, such as a
shuttle bus, crossing from one campus to another. It is staffs opinion that the use of the shuttle
bus promotes a safe mode of transport between the Campuses and, therefore, recommends
APPROVAL of the applicant’s request to delete Condition 1 of Resolution 5, 2000.
8
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance l8,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance 19,2005/Resolution 84,2005
Residential Low-3 (RL-3)
Planned Development Area
wPUD Overlay;
SECTION 2;
Residentin’ 1 -.-. ID1 \
NORTH CAMPUS EXPANSION AND CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL
NQ&
The Hunt Club Residential PUD
The subject petition involves a request to rezone the property to incorporate the East 20 Acres into
the PUD in order to allow the development of a 159,180 square-foot expansion to the North
Campus, and to allow a Conditional Use approval for the entire North Campus. The East 20 Acres
will retain a Residential Low Density-3 underlying zoning designation with a PUD Overlay,
consistent with the existing North Campus (Note: the South Campus has a Conditional Use Overlay
with a Residential Low Density-1 (RL1) underlying zoning designation and is not a part of the
approved PUD). The entire 40-acre North Campus PUD will include an underlying Conditional
Use approval consistent with the requirements of the LDRs.
(PDA)
Residential Low-3 (RL-3)
wPUD Overlav Residential Low (=)
LAND USE & ZONING
Residential Low-3 (RL-3)
w/Conditional Use Overlay;
Residential Estates
PBC Professional Office
(PO); PBC Agricultural
Residential (AR) with
Special Exception (SE)
The existing North Campus has a Residential Low Density-3 (RL-3) underlying zoning designation
with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay and a land-use designation of Residential Low
(RL). The East 20 Acres has a Planned Development Area (PDA) zoning designation and a land-
use designation of Residential Low (RL).
The existing land uses and zoning designations of properties surrounding the Property are provided
in the following table:
Residential Low (RL)
PBC Institutional (INST)
w/underlying of High
Residential 8 (HR-8); Low
Residential (LR- 1)
ZONING CLASSIFICATIONS, LAND-USE DESIGNATIONS
Residential Low-3 (RL-3)
w/PUD Overlay
I I I EXISTMG USE ZONING LAND USE
Residential Low (RL)
&bjxt Property
Existing North Campus; Vacant II
&!&
Church of the Nmene; Christ Fellowship South Campus;
Horseshoe Acres
East
PB County Senior Center/ Christ Fellowship Special Needs
Center & Place of Hope
West
Cypress Hollow PUD
CONCURRENCY
On July 16, 2004, the Palm Beach County Traffic Division issued a letter affirming that the
proposed North Campus expansion meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County
subject to the following condition: “Conversion of the existing westbound right-turn lane to a
9
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance 18,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance 19,2005/Resolution 84,2005
shared throuflright lane at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Military Trail” (please see
attached traffic concurrency approval letter from the PBC Trafic Division). The Palm Beach
County traffic concurrency approval permits a 160,000 square-foot addition to the existing 85,200
square-foot North Campus and the 21,000 square-foot South Campus and establishes a build-out
date of December 3 1,2006, for the proposed improvements.
The City’s traffic consultant, MTP Group, Inc. (the “Traffic Consultant”) also reviewed the subject
petition and found it to be in compliance with the City of Palm Beach Gardens Traffic Performance
Standards subject to the aforesaid condition imposed by the County. Other recommendations made
by the Traffic Consultant to mitigate the impact of the traffic generated by the proposed
improvements include:
(a) The Sunday service shall be moved from 11 :45 a.m. to 12:OO noon. The required time
between services may be modified by the Growth Management Administrator as necessary
to improve traffic operations.
(b) Traffic circulation on site shall be in accordance with the Traffic Operation Plan (attached)
provided in the traffic impact analysis for the project on file with the City’s Growth
Management Department. Said traffic plan may be amended by the City’s Police Chief
andor City Engineer as appropriate for traffic operations.
(c) The applicant shall, with trained personnel, monitor traffic conditions at the driveways as
well as internal traffic circulation to minimize traffic impact to Northlake Boulevard.
PROJECT DETAILS
The subject petition involves a request to rezone the East 20 Acres to incorporate it into the North
Campus PUD and to allow the development of a 159,180 square-foot expansion to the North
Campus. The proposed expansion will consist of three (3) phases of construction (site plans
depicting all three (3) stages of construction have been included in the Council’s packet):
Phase I will include primarily site work, including paving, grading and drainage, as well as site
lighting and landscaping, all of which will tie in with the existing North Campus. The required
utilities for the future Phase I1 and I11 buildings will be stubbed-out into the building pad areas
at approximate locations on-site. All grassed and asphalt parking areas and drive isles will be
completed. A new main entry drive off of Northlake Boulevard will be constructed to align
with the existing median cut for the South Campus. A westbound deceleration, right-turn lane is
also being proposed. The area upon which the future buildings will be constructed will be
sodded until construction commences on Phases I1 and 111. Also included in Phase I is the
enclosure of an existing covered patio on the northwest corner of the existing Building B. The
architecture of the enclosed patio will match the existing building and the additional square
footage has been accounted for in the project’s traffic concurrency approval.
Phase I1 will consist of the construction of a two (2) story, 115,683 square-foot building that
will accommodate a “youth ministry/multipurpose” room, a “commons” area, a “choir suite,” a
kitchen, several “ministry training” rooms, a “youth department,” and a significant amount of
office space.
Phase I11 will consist of a two (2) story, 41,675 square-foot building that will accommodate a
gymnasium with an indoor track, as well as ancillary office and recreation areas.
10
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance l8,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance 19,2005/Resolution 84,2005
(Note: Please see the attached letter from the applicant containing detailed information as to the
types of activities taking place within the new buildings.)
Site Desian
The proposed design of the East 20 Acres mirrors the design of the existing North Campus. The
proposed buildings have been positioned directly east of existing structures (Buildings A, B and C)
so as to continue the campus-like setting for the site. The existing structures will be connected to
the new buildings through the use of covered walkways and an interior building connection. The
pickup/dropoff area has been relocated from the east side of existing Building A to two (2) separate
areas: the front (south side) of the Phase I1 building and the east side of the Phase I11 building. The
existing parking layout surrounding the buildings, which includes both paved and grassed parking,
has been continued on the East 20 Acres. The site contains a three-isle-wide access drive
surrounding the buildings and a majority of the parking that will assist in moving vehicles into,
through and out of the property. Two (2) additional loading spaces have been placed within a
loading area on the south (front) side of the Phase I1 building adjacent to the kitchen. The loading
area has been screened from view by a wall that matches the color and style of the adjacent
buildings.
The proposed buildings are set back approximately 500 feet from Northlake Boulevard, 290 feet
from the east property line, and 500 feet from the north property line, all of which are consistent
with the requirements of the LDRs for the proposed RL-3 underlying zoning district. The applicant
is proposing an overall building lot coverage of 12.64% of the site; the LDRs limit lot coverage to
35% of the site.
Traffic Circulation
As part of the Traffic Consultant’s review of the project’s conformance with the City’s Traffic
Performance Standards, the applicant was required to submit a traffic operation plan identifying the
traffic circulation during the peak hours of the Church’s operation. The Traffic Consultant, City
Engineer, Police Department and Growth Management Department have worked in conjunction to
modify the submitted traffic operation plan in order to improve traffic flow into and out of the site,
as well as along Northlake Boulevard. The applicant has submitted a revised traffic operation plan
in accordance with the recommendations made by staff. The approving resolution requires the
applicant to adhere to the traffic operation plan once it is approved by the City and provides the
City’s Police Chief and/or City Engineer the authority to amend the plan in the future as appropriate
for traffic operations.
Staff has also requested that the applicant apply to the County to install a traffic signal at the
easternmost entrance to the North Campus to improve traffic flow at peak times of the Church’s
operations. During off-peak times, the signal will be a flashing yellow for traffic along Northlake
and a flashing red for the traffic utilizing the campuses. A condition of approval relating to the
same has been included in the approving resolution.
Architecture
The proposed architecture is generally consistent with the existing North Campus architecture in
11
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance 18,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance l9,2005/Resolution 84,2005
many aspects (i.e. building colors, standing seam metal roofs, roof pitches, roof color, stucco
banding, decorative columns, etc.). However, the newly proposed architecture exhibits more
variety than the existing structures. The applicant has included a mix of flat and pitched roofs,
several tower features, including a 56-foot tall “prayer tower” feature, an art deco-type building
parapet on the north elevation, porches and covered walkways throughout, two (2) new porte-
cocheres, and decorative columns. It is staffs opinion that the horizontal and vertical massing
provided by the applicant helps soften the appearance of the size and mass of the proposed
buildings.
The maximum mean height of the structures, excluding the prayer tower, has been increased from
36 feet to 38’-10” since the PZAB Workshop. The maximum height of buildings within a
Residential Low Density-3 (RL3) zoning district is 36 feet. The applicant has met with Board
member Hansen, who pointed out that the colored elevation renderings did not match the hard-line
(CADD) architectural drawings. In particular, Mr. Hansen noted that he preferred the roofline of
the Commons/Student Ministry Building as depicted in the colored elevations over that depicted in
the CADD drawing. To address this comment, the applicant has revised architectural plans to
create a larger roof mass on the Commons/Student Ministry building. This modification increases
the mean roof height of the building to 38’-10”. While in keeping with the scale, context and
setbacks of the building, the proposed height requires an additional waiver. The applicant has
requested a waiver to allow the CommodStudent Ministry Building at a height of 38’-10”. This
waiver is further discussed in the “Waivers” section of this report.
Landscaving/Bu fferinq
The proposed landscaping on the East 20 Acres will be a continuation of the landscape theme on the
existing North Campus.
Landscaping: Royal Palms will line the new easternmost entrance and will be scattered throughout
the southernmost (front) parking area and along landscape areas adjacent to the south facade of the
new buildings. Mahogany, Laurel Oak, East Palatka Holly, Live Oak, Yellow and Pink Tabebula,
Crepe Myrtle, Cabbage Palm, Washington Palm, Florida Slash Pine and various Ornamental species
comprise the proposed landscape palette for the East 20 Acres.
Buffering: The applicant is proposing an approximately 75-foot landscape buffer with a berm along
Northlake Boulevard, to include amongst other species Live Oak, Mahogany, Cypress, Florida
Slash Pine, and Cabbage Palm. This buffer has been designed to be consistent with the existing
North Campus buffer along Northlake Boulevard, which in staffs opinion provides substantial
screening of the site from Northlake Boulevard. An eight (8) foot wide landscape buffer is being
proposed along the east property line. An approximately 80 foot wide of open space is proposed
along the north property line adjacent to the Hunt Club residential development, including a dry
detention area and a six (6) foot high wall across the entire length of the northern boundary of the
North Campus. At the request of staff, the applicant has added a significant amount of landscaping
to the existing northernmost open space area on the North Campus adjacent to Hunt Club and will
continue this landscape theme along the entire northern border.
12
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance 18,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance 19,2005/Resolution 84,2005
Utility Lines Along Northlake Boulevard
The location of the existing power lines along the Northlake Boulevard frontage of the North
Campus is in conflict with the mature trees within the North Campus buffer. Thus, the utility
companies regularly “cut back” the trees significantly to eliminate any contact with the power lines.
To avoid this in the future, staff is requesting that the applicant place the power lines underground
along the entire North Campus frontage along Northlake Boulevard.
Section 78-5 10 of the City’s LDR’s entitled Utilities, states that all new, reconstructed, or relocated
utilities installed within a subdivision or any development, including but not limited to electric,
telephone, and cable television, shall be placed underground. As part of the development of the
North Campus, the applicant will be installing a new right-hand turn lane into the easternmost
entrance to the North Campus. Staff has requested that the applicant install a right-hand turn lane
onto Hunt Club Drive. The construction of these turn lanes will require the relocation of the
existing utility lines along Northlake. The LDRs require these relocated utility lines to be placed
underground. Staff has included a condition of approval requiring the power lines along the entire
length of the North Campus to be placed underground.
Drainaae -
The applicant has provided a letter (attached) from the project engineer explaining in detail the
design of the drainage system that will accommodate the proposed improvements. The City
Engineer has reviewed the proposed drainage system and has no outstanding concerns relating to
the same.
Parking
Based on the requirements of Section 78-345 of the City’s Land Development Regulations,
Churches and Places of Worship require one (1) space for every three (3) seats, plus one (1) space
for every 250 square feet of office use, plus required parking for additional uses. Due to the fact
that both the existing and the proposed buildings contain a significant amount of space that cannot
be classified into either of the above categories (areas containing a certain amount of seating or
office space), staff has utilized the parking ratio for “Cultural, Entertainment, and Recreational,”
which requires one (1) space for every 200 square feet. Based on the above calculations, the
required number of parking spaces on the entire 40-acre site is 1,845 spaces. The applicant has
provided a total of 1,884 parking spaces on site; 1,086 grassed parking spaces (discussed below)
and 798 paved parking spaces.
Grassed Darking: The existing North Campus has a significant number of grassed parking spaces
that are utilized only during peak demand. The applicant is proposing to continue the mix of paved
and grassed parking for the East 20 Acres in order to reduce the amount of paved area on site.
Section 78-372 of the City’s LDRs contains several criteria that must be satisfied in order to utilize
grassed parking. The applicant has provided the necessary documentation to the satisfaction of staff
and the City Engineer that demonstrates compliance with said criteria.
The 777 grassed parking spaces on the northernmost portion of the plan are being proposed at 9.5
feet wide. The City’s LDRs require that parking spaces be a minimum of 10 feet in width. The
applicant has requested a waiver from said requirement that is discussed in the “Waivers’’ section of
13
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance l8,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance l9,2005/Resolution 84,2005
this report.
The proposed number of grassed parking spaces relative to the number of required parking spaces is
inconsistent with one (1) of the additional standards for Churches and Places of Worship found in
Section 78-159(j) of the City’s LDRs. This section limits the number of grassed parking spaces to a
maximum of 50% of the total number of required spaces on site. The applicant is required to
provide a total of 1,845 parking spaces on site; the applicant is proposing 1,086 grassed parking
spaces (59% of required parking). The applicant has requested a waiver from said requirement that
is discussed in the “Waivers” section of this report.
Sianage
The applicant is proposing two (2) additional monument signs to be located on both sides of the
new easternmost entrance, for a total of four (4) signs on site. The signs will be consistent with the
design and dimensions of the two (2) existing signs at the North Campus. The 40-acre site has
adequate street frontage to allow for a total of four (4) monument signs. The proposed signs are in
compliance with the LDRs.
The applicant has provided a photometric plan that is in compliance with the requirements of the
LDRs. The light poles within the grassed areas will be protected from vehicle encroachment
through the use of wheelstops.
ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR CHURCHES AND PLACES OF WORSHIP
Section 78-1 59(j)(49) of the City’s LDRs (attached), entitled Additional standards (for Churches
and Places of Worship), contains standards with which Churches and Places of Worship must
comply. Subsection b. thereof states that such use with more than 1,000 permanent seats or
approved capacity may be located as a Conditional Use in the following districts: CG-1, CG-2, P/I,
M1, M1A and M2. At the time that the existing North Campus was approved by the City, Churches
and Places of Worship were permitted in all residential zoning districts as a Conditional Use
regardless of the number of seats. The development order for the existing North Campus limits the
number of seats within the sanctuary to 1,750 seats and prohibits the existing Buildings A and B
from being used as overflow areas or for supplemental seating for presentations, programs, or
sermons conducted in the sanctuary.
Section 78-159(j)(49) of the LDRs also list typical uses that are associated with churches and places
of worship:
1. Sanctuaries, assembly halls, or similar large meeting rooms where religious services are
held;
2. Community centers or fellowship halls, which may be the site of religious services, but also
used for community, athletic, fraternal, social, civic, charitable, and recreational programs;
3. Offices utilized for administrative purposes related to the operation of the church or place of
worship;
4. Religious merchandise or merchandise related to the operation of the house of worship may
be sold in an accessory retail facility;
14
Date Prepared: May 31,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance 18,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance I9,2005/Resolution 84,2005
5. Playgrounds and athletic fields; and
6. Rectory or similar residence for religious officials, limited to one (1) per place of worship.
The current requirements of the LDRs do not limit the size of the ancillary uses within a church, but
only limit the number of seats in the sanctuary.
OTHER RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS WITHIN THE CITY
The following table identifies the religious institutions within the City and their corresponding
square footage, number of seats within each sanctuary, and approval status as conditional uses.
*Note: Trinity Methodist Church Master Plan was approved by the City on February 6, 1992,
through the adoption of Ordinance 2, 1992. The approval provided for a new sanctuary building
containing 2,400 seats, which has not yet been constructed. The existing sanctuary building
contains 497 seats and the existing square footage is estimated at approximately 100,000 square
feet.
CONDITIONAL USE ANALYSIS
Section 78- 159 of the City’s Land Development Regulations, entitled Permitted uses, conditional,
and prohibited uses, requires that Churches and Places of Worship be approved as a Conditional
Use within the Residential Low Density-3 (RL3) zoning district.
Staff has compared the expansion of the existing Christ Fellowship Church against the City’s
Conditional Use criteria found in Section 78-52 of the City’s LDRs. The conditional use analysis
demonstrates that (1) the requested expansion of the ancillary uses, in staffs opinion, is incidental
and subordinate to the principal sanctuary use and is thereby consistent with provisions of the
LDRs; and (2) the development plans and the conditions placed upon the operation of the Church
by staff both have been designed and structured such that the proposed expansion of the use
15
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance l8,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance 19,2005/Resolution 84,2005
Code Section
complies with the City’s Conditional Use Criteria established in Section 78-52 of the LDRs.
Required Provided Recommendation
WAIVERS
Section 78-3 15(b) Of the city’s LDR’s?
entitled Landscape Islands
Section 78-414 of the City’s LDRs,
entitled Number of spaces required
(Bicycle Parking)
entitled Residential zoning district
regulations
Section 78-159(i)(49) of the City’s LDRs,
entitled Additional standards
Section 78-344 (1)(1), entitled Minimum
dimensions (of off-street parking)
Section 78-141 Of the city’s LDRs,
The applicant is requesting approval of the following five (5) waivers:
One (1) landscape More than nine (9)
parking spaces a landscape island
Approval (1) island every nine (9) spaces w/out
93 48 Approval (2)
CommonsIStudent
Max Building Height: Ministry Building: 36 feet 38’-10” max mean Approval (3)
height of roof
59% of required parking grassed Approval (4)
777 spaces at 9.5’ 10’ wide wide Approval (5)
Max 50% of required
permitted to
be grassed parking
SUMMARY OF REQUESTED WAIVERS
1. Waiver from Section 78-3 15(b) of the City’s LDRs entitled Landscape Islands, to allow for
more than nine (9) parking spaces in a row without the inclusion of a landscape island. Said
section requires at least one (1) landscape diamond for every nine parking spaces.
Applicant’s Justification: In lieu of providing a landscape island every nine (9) spaces, the
applicant has provided a five (5) foot-wide strip of landscaping adjacent to (in front of) all
paved parking spaces, with the exception of those adjacent to the sidewalks surrounding the
buildings where the applicant has satisfied the requirement for a landscape diamond every
nine (9) spaces (please see attached landscape plan). This design is consistent with the
existing North Campus and provides a significant amount of landscaped area within the
paved parking areas. Further, the applicant has met the requirement of having a shade tree
within 40 feet of every parking space.
Staff Analvsis: Staff does not have an objection to the waiver request as the applicant has
provided a five (5) foot-wide strip of landscaping adjacent to (in front of) all paved parking
spaces, has satisfied the requirement of providing a shade tree within 40 feet of every
parking space, and at the request of staff has provided 35% open space on site. Staff
recommends APPROVAL of the requested waiver.
2. Waiver from Section 78-414 of the City’s LDRs, entitled Number of spaces required, to
allow for a total of 48 bicycle parking spaces on site. The City’s LDRs require 93 bicycle
parking spaces on site.
16
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance l8,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance l9,2005/Resolution 84,2005
Applicant’s Justification: Based on the amount of bicycle traffic currently coming to the
site, the applicant feels that the provision of 48 bicycle parking spaces scattered throughout
the site is sufficient.
Staff Analysis: Staff is in agreement with the applicant’s justification and, therefore,
recommends APPROVAL of the waiver request.
3. Waiver from Section 78-141 of the City’s LDRs, entitled Residential zoning district
regulations, to allow for a maximum mean roof height of 38’-10” on the Commons/Student
Ministry Building. Said section limits the height of buildings within the RL-3 zoning
district to 36 feet.
Applicant’s Justification: The applicant has stated that during a meeting with Mr. Hansen, it
was pointed out that the colored elevation renderings did not match the hard-line (CADD)
architectural drawings. In particular, Mr. Hansen noted that he preferred the roofline of the
Student Ministry building as depicted in the colored elevations over that depicted in the
CADD drawing. To address this comment, the architectural plans have been revised to
create a larger roof mass on the Commons/Student Ministry building. This modification
increases the maximum mean roof height of the building to 38’-10”. The applicant has
indicated that the proposed height is in keeping with the scale, context and setbacks of the
building.
Staff Analysis: It is staffs opinion that the horizontal and vertical massing provided by the
applicant helps soften the appearance of the size and mass of the proposed buildings. The
2’-10” waiver request is minimal in nature and will not create greater negative impact on the
adjacent residents that would a building that met the 36-foot maximum mean roof height
requirement. Further, the maximum height to the 9 of roof of the existing Sanctuary
Building is 43 feet. The maximum height to the Q of the roof of the proposed building is
approximately 44 feet. Staff recommends APPROVAL of the waiver request.
4. Waiver from Section 78-1590’)(49) of the City’s LDRs, entitled Additional standards (for
Churches and Places of Worship), to allow for more than 50% of the required parking to be
grassed. The applicant is proposing 1,086 grassed parking spaces which amounts to 59% of
the required parking on site. Said section limits the number of grassed parking spaces to
50% of the required parking spaces.
Applicant’s Justification: The applicant has stated that the proposed grass parking areas will
only be used during peak hours of the Church’s operation, approximately 11 hours per week.
Due to the infrequent use of these parking areas, the applicant preferred to provide stabilized
grass parking on site so as to limit the amount of paved area.
Staff Analysis: Staff agrees with the applicant’s justification and has included conditions of
approval that ensure the proper maintenance of the grassed parking areas. Staff
recommends APPROVAL of the waiver request.
5. Waiver from City Code Section 78-344 (1)( l), entitled Minimum dimensions (of off-street
parking), to allow for 777 9.5-foot-wide grassed parking spaces on the northernmost portion
of the plan. City Code requires 10-foot-wide parking spaces.
17
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance 18,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance 19,2005/Resolution 84,2005
Applicant’s Justification: The applicant’s traffic circulation plan that has been reviewed and
approved by the City shows three (3) drive lanes along the “loop road” surrounding the
property. Currently there exists only two (2) lanes - the applicant has added the additional
lane to improve traffic flow within the site and keep the disruption to the traffic along
Northlake at a minimum. The applicant had previously proposed to place the additional lane
of traffic on the outside of the existing lanes closer to the Hunt Club development. At the
request of staff, the applicant amended the plan to place the additional lane on the inside of
the existing lanes. At the suggestion of the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board and in
order not to reduce the number of grassed parking spaces on the north portion of the plan,
the applicant has reduced the width of the parking spaces in this area from 10 feet, as
previously proposed, to 9.5 feet in order to accommodate the additional lane.
Staff Analysis: Staff agrees with the applicant’s justification and recommends
APPROVAL of the waiver request with the intent of maintaining the existing open space
width between the loop road and Hunt Club.
PUBLIC NOTICE
Public notices were mailed by the applicant to all properties and property owners within 500 feet of
the 40-acre site and the South Campus, as well as to every property and property owner in the
following residential developments: Cypress Hollow, Hunt Club, Steeplechase, and Horseshoe
Acres.
PLANNING. ZONING AND APPEALS BOARD WORKSHOP OF OCTOBER 26.2004
At its November 13, 2001 meeting, the petition to amend the conditions of approval for the
Campuses was reviewed by the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board (referred to at the time as the
“Planning and Zoning Commission”), and the Board followed the recommendation of the staff of
the City at that time and recommended approval of the proposed amendments by a vote of 6-1. It is
important to note that staffs recommendation on the proposed modifications to the conditions of
approval has changed since the 2001 PZAB meeting.
On May 24,2005, the City’s Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board (PZAB) held a public hearing to
review the proposed expansion and Conditional Use approval for the Christ Fellowship North
Campus PUD (as noted in the “Background section” of this report, the proposed expansion and
Conditional Use approval were reviewed by the Board independently of the petition to amend the
conditions of approval as this petition had already been heard by the Board in 2001). The Board
voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the subject petition to the City Council along with the
requested waivers. The Board’s motion included the following recommendations based on staffs
outstanding issues at the time:
*:* Staff had requested that the applicant provide 35% open space on site, consistent with the
original approval. The Board recommended that the open space provided by the applicant at
that time, 32.6 %, was sufficient. The applicant has since revised the plans to provide
35.2 % open space on site at the request of staff.
*:* Staff had requested that the applicant place the existing utilities along Northlake Boulevard
18
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance 18,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance 19,2005/Resolution 84,2005
underground along the entire length of the North Campus property (please see the “Utility
Lines Along Northlake Boulevard” section of this report). The Board stated that this request
was an undue burden on the applicant and recommended that this condition imposed by staff
be removed. Staff maintains that the utilities are required to be buried if relocated and
should be buried along the entire frontage of Northlake Boulevard in order to eliminate
conflicts with the North Campus landscape buffer. Staff has included a condition of
approval requiring the same.
*:* The Board followed staffs recommendation that applicant place the additional lane of
traffic along the loop road inside of the existing lanes on the northern portion of the property
so as not to further impact the residents of Hunt Club. The Board recommended that the
applicant reduce the grass parking spaces on the northernmost portion of the plan to 9.5 feet
in width to accommodate the additional lane of traffic and recommended approval of a
waiver to allow for the reduced parking stall width. The applicant has modified the site
plan to comply with this request.
*:* Staff had requested that no access be provided to the vacant property owned by the Church
to the northeast of the North Campus that lies within unincorporated Palm Beach County.
Staff had an issue with this access point, as the City has no control over the activities taking
place on said property. The City thus would not have any control over the development of
this property such as an increase of the size of the campus beyond that currently proposed.
Also, this property could be utilized for overflow parking without the City’s control, perhaps
causing undue hardship to the residents of Hunt Club.
The Board recommended that the access point be permitted, but that a condition of approval
be included in the approving resolution that required the access point to be a closed and
locked gate, only to be used for maintenance purposes and that the vacant property not be
used for overflow parking. At the request of staff, the applicant has since revised the
plans to remove said access point, continue the landscape buffer across the previously
proposed access drive, and depict it only as a “future access drive.”
*:* The Board recommended a condition of approval that required any future outdoor
recreational facilities proposed on the North Campus be processed as a Major Amendment
to the PUD, which requires review and approval by the Board and the City Council. Staff
has included a condition of approval requiring the same.
STAFF ANALYSIS
With regard to the proposed amendments to the conditions of approval, staff does not support any
modification that would allow an increase in the capacity of the Sanctuary, as in staffs opinion
such an increase is not consistent with the requirements of the LDRs (please see “Proposed
Deletion of Certain Conditions of Approval” section of this report).
Should the City Council approve the attached resolutions as proposed by staff, the applicant would
be prohibited from (1) increasing the number of seats within the Sanctuary; (2) utilizing any
building on the North or South Campus for overflow areas or for supplemental seating for
presentations, programs or sermons conducted in the Sanctuary; and (3) transmitting any
simultaneous broadcasts of presentations, programs and sermons conducted in the Sanctuary to any
19
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance l8,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance l9,2005/Resolution 84,2005
remote location on the North or South Campus.
safeguards maintain the spirit and intent of the Sanctuary’s capacity at 1,750 seats.
It is staffs professional opinion that these
Churches and Places of Worship permitted as a Conditional Use within residential zoning
districts. A portion of the subject petition involves the expansion of the Church’s ancillary uses on
the North Campus, the size of which are not specifically regulated by the LDRs. Ancillary uses are
allowed to the extent that they continue to be incidental and subordinate to the principal use. The
proposed expansion meets the requirements of the LDRs with the exception of those requirements
from which the applicant has requested a waiver (see “Waivers” section of the staff report), all of
which staff is recommending approval.
Staff has proposed conditions to attempt to ensure that the proposed site plan is designed to mitigate
impacts on surrounding properties so that the quality of life of the surrounding neighborhoods is not
diminished.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends APPROVAL of Ordinance 18, 2005 and Resolution 83, 2005 allowing for (1)
the incorporation of 20 acres of land lying immediately east of the existing North Campus into the
PUD to facilitate the development of a 159,180 square-foot expansion to the North Campus; (2) the
approval of a Conditional Use for the expanded Christ Fellowship Campus; (3) modifications to the
following previously imposed conditions of approval, as reflected below:
*:* Ordinance 23,1999, Condition 3: Simultaneous Broadcasts “Simultaneous broadcasts of
presentations, programs and sermons conducted in the Sanctuary to any other iwmte
location on the North or South Cam~usv ’ , shall be prohibited.”
*:* Ordinance 20, 1997, Condition 7: Special Events Limited to Six (6) Per Year “The
church sanctuary and related facilities and surrounding grounds shall be used by members
only for regularly scheduled services, including services on Christmas Day and Easter Day,
and for no more than three (3) s-HF-(@ additional events per calendar year. The church
sanctuary and related facilities shall not be leased, rented or in any way be made available
for use as an auditorium, theater or similar gathering place for non-member events of any
kind. Regularly scheduled services shall be defined as services occurring on Saturday
evening, Sunday morning, and a mid-week evening.”
*:* Ordinance 23, 1999, Condition 2: Supplemental Seating “No buildings on site Btddmgs
kwd-3 shall I& be used as overflow areas or for supplemental seating for presentations,
programs or sermons conducted in the Sanctuary.”
Staff is recommending DENIAL of the proposed deletion of the following conditions of approval:
*:* Ordinance 20, 1997, Condition 9: Sound Amplification “The owner or successor shall
not utilize a loudspeaker, sound amplifier, radio, phonograph, of similar sound amplifjmg
device to emit any form of sound outside the church sanctuary and related facilities.”
*:* Ordinance 20, 1997, Condition 12: Number of Fixed Seats “The number of fixed and/or
moveable seats within the sanctuary shall at no time exceed 1,750.”
20
Date Prepared: May 3 1,2005
Meeting Date: July 20,2005
Ordinance 18,2005/Resolution 83,2005
Ordinance 19,2005/Resolution 84,2005
It is important to note that Resolution 83,2005 has been prepared to reflect staffs recommendation
relative to the requested waivers and the proposed deletion of certain conditions of approval for the
North Campus (please see the “Proposed Deletion of Certain Conditions of Approval” section of
this report for further detail regarding stafs recommendations).
Staff recommends APPROVAL of Ordinance 19, 2005 and Resolution 84, 2005 allowing for
amendments to the site plan and Conditional Use approval for the Christ Fellowship South Campus
to allow for the deletion of the following previously imposed conditions of approval:
Resolution 5, 2000, Condition 1: Shuttle Bus Service +
Staff recommends DENIAL of the proposed deletion of the following condition of approval:
*:* Ordinance 34,1999, Condition 2: Simultaneous Broadcasts “Simultaneous broadcasts of
presentations, programs and sermons conducted at any remote location to this site shall be
prohibited.”
It is important to note that Resolution 84,2005 has been prepared to reflect staffs recommendation
relative to the requested waivers and the proposed modifications to the conditions of approval for
the South Campus (please see the “Proposed Deletion of Certain Conditions of Approval” section
of this report for further detail regarding stafs recommendations).
21
CONDITIONAL USE ANALYSIS
City of Palm Beach Gardens LDR Section 78-52
(1) Comprehensive plan. The proposed use is consistent with comprehensive plan.
Staff AnaJysis: Staff has reviewed the proposed expansion of use and recommends that the PZAB
consider the following Goal of the Comprehensive Plan:
GOAL 1.1.: CONTINUE TO ENSURE: A HIGH QUALITY LIVING ENVIRONMENT
THROUGH A MIXTURE OF LAND USES THAT WILL MAXIMIZE PALM BEACH
GARDENS‘ NATURAL AND MANMADE RESOURCES WHILE MINIMIZING ANY
THREAT TO THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF THE CITY’S CITIZENS
THAT IS CAUSED BY INCOMPATIBLE LAND USES AND ENVIRONMENTAL
DEGRADATION.
(2) Chapter requirements. The proposed use is consistent with all applicable requirements
of this chapter.
Staff Analvsis: Section 78- 159(j)(49) of the City’s LDRs (attached), entitled Additional standards
(for Churches and Places of Worship), contains standards with which Churches and Places of
Worship must comply. Subsection b. thereof states that such use with more than 1,000 permanent
seats or approved capacity may be located as a conditional use in the following districts: CG-1, CG-
2, PA, M1, MIA and M2. At the time that the existing North Campus was approved by the City,
Churches and Places of Worship were permitted in all residential zoning districts as a conditional
use regardless of the number of seats. The development order for the existing North Campus limits
the number of seats within the Sanctuary to 1,750 seats and prohibits the existing Buildings A and B
from being used as overflow areas or for supplemental seating for presentations, programs, or
sermons conducted in the Sanctuary.
The applicant is requesting to amend the PUD to increase the number of seats within the Sanctuary.
Staff is not in support of this request or any request that increases the capacity of the Sanctuary, as
the request is inconsistent with the aforesaid additional standards for Churches and Places of
Worship within a residential zoning district by exceeding the number of seats permitted in the
district.
Staff interprets the principal use to be the Sanctuary and the requested expansion to continue to be
incidental and subordinate to the sanctuary use. The proposed expansion meets the requirements of
the LDRs with the exception of those requirements from which the applicant has requested a waiver
(see “Waivers” section of the staff report), all of which staff is recommending approval.
(3) Standards. The proposed use is consistent with the standards for such use as provided
in Section 78-159.
StuffAnalvsis: See previous Staff Analysis.
(4) Public welfare. The proposed use provides for the public health, safety, and welfare
by:
a.
b.
Providing for a safe and effective means of pedestrian access;
Providing for a safe and effective means of vehicular ingress and egress;
c.
d.
Providing for an adequate roadway system adjacent to and front of the site;
Providing for safe and efficient onsite traffic circulation, parking, and overall
control; and
Providing adequate access for public safety purposes, including fire and police
protection.
e.
Stuff Analvsis: The applicant has provided a pedestrian access-way from Northlake Boulevard to
the main entrance of the CommonsNouth Ministry Building.
The applicant is providing a turn lane into each entrance of the site to provide an effective means of
vehicular ingress and egress. Staff has included a condition of approval that requires the applicant
to install a turn lane onto Hunt Club Drive from Northlake Boulevard to further enhance the
roadway system in front of the site.
The City’s traffic consultant has reviewed the proposed traffic circulation plan; the applicant is
required as a condition of approval to comply with said plan.
Concerns have been raised that the proposed expansion will further impact the traffic along
Northlake Boulevard during the peak times of the Church’s operations. The management of traffic
for this use is a critical component of ensuring safe and efficient traffic circulation and safe and
efficient access, as traffic before and after activities at the site will create temporary congestion.
The applicant is required as a condition of approval to utilize police or equally trained officials at all
ingress and egress points along Northlake Boulevard for the management of traffic flow and
direction before and after all events, including regularly scheduled events, and is required to monitor
traffic conditions at the driveways as well as internal traffic circulation to minimize traffic impact to
Northlake Boulevard. The Police Department reports indicate that off-duty officers are utilized four
days per week for the regular services of the Church. Although there have been citizen complaints
related to the traffic situation in the past, the City’s records indicate that these concerns have been
addressed by the Church in a timely fashion, and have resulted in no code enforcement proceedings.
The submitted plans have been reviewed by the City’s Fire Department to ensure proper access is
provided.
(5) Screening and buffering. The proposed use utilizes such techniques as landscaping,
screening, buffering, site or building design, or business operation procedures to
mitigate impacts on surrounding properties, including such impact as:
a. Noise;
b. Glare;
C. Odor;
d.
e.
f. Signs;
Ground-, wall-, or roof-mounted mechanical equipment;
Perimeter, interior, and security lighting;
2
g. Waste disposal and recycling;
h.
1. Visual impact; and
j. Hours of operation.
Outdoor storage of merchandise and vehicles;
Staff Analvsis: Staff has required a photometric study to ensure the impacts of glare are addressed.
Noise impacts are addressed by conditions of approval requiring the applicant to (1) comply with
the applicable noise and decibel requirements set forth in the City’s Code of Ordinances; (2) explore
opportunities to utilize sound absorbing/dampening building materials in the new buildings and
provide, in writing, details of the materialdmethods to be utilized to reduce the impact relative to
sound on adjacent properties. The proposed site plan is designed such that impacts on surrounding
properties are sought to be mitigated so that the quality of life of the adjacent communities is not
diminished. Nevertheless, the visual impacts and other impacts on the community will be affected
by the size of the site and the increased activities at the site. Conditions of approval to ensure the
impacts have been mitigated have been proposed to be a part of any approval and are discussed in
the staff report.
(6) Utilities. The proposed use minimizes or eliminates the impact of utility installation,
including underground and overhead utilities, on adjacent properties.
Stuff AnaZvsis: The proposed expansion of the use minimizes any impact on adjacent properties
relative to the installation of utilities as part of the expansion. In fact, the proposed expansion has
been designed to gather and collect some stormwater drainage from the Hunt Club residential
development to the north.
(7) Dimensional standards. The proposed use meets or exceeds all dimensional
requirements required by the chapter.
Stuff Analysis: The proposed expansion is consistent with all dimensional requirements required by
the chapter with the exception of those requirements from which the applicant has requested a
waiver (see “Waivers” section of the staff report).
(8) Neighborhood plans. The proposed use is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies,
and standards of neighborhood plans.
Staff AnaJvsis: There are no existing neighborhood plans with which that the proposed expansion is
inconsistent
(9) Compatibility. The overall compatibility of the proposed development with adjacent
and area uses, and character of area development.
Stuff Analysis: The existing North Campus received development approval fiom the City in 1997,
at which time the use was determined compatible with the adjacent residential neighborhoods and
several conditions of approval were placed on the original development approval and subsequent
amendments to the North Campus, which were generated by neighborhood concern that the use was
too intense for the residential character of the neighborhood. These conditions will remain in full
force and effect should the subject petition be approved.
3
The proposed expansion involves the expansion of the Church’s ancillary uses, the size of which is
not specifically regulated by the City’s LDRs as explained above. There is concern that the
expansion is not in keeping with the residential character of the surrounding residential
neighborhoods and that the proposed use is more commercial than residential in nature. The subject
site has a Residential Low Density-3 (RL3) underlying zoning designation. Section 78-137 of the
City’s LDRs entitled Composition and intent (of the Residential Low Density-3 underlying zoning
district) states that “the district regulations are designed to protect the residential character of the
districts by prohibiting commercial activities, to encourage a suitable neighborhood environment for
family life by including among the uses such facilities such as schools and churches, and to preserve
the openness of the district by requiring certain minimum yard and area standards” [Emphasis
supplied]. The LDRs acknowledge that churches and schools are compatible with residential uses;
however, concern has been expressed that there is a point at which the size of a church and the
ancillary uses reach a magnitude such that it is not compatible with the surrounding residential
neighborhoods. The City’s Fire Department estimates, based on the documents provided, that the
capacity of the new buildings is approximately 3,753 persons (this is a rough estimate and does take
into account restrooms, small purpose rooms, or the existing buildings on site). Combined with the
existing capacity on site, there is the potential for a total on-site capacity to reach approximately
7,000 persons at a particular time.
Staff has proposed conditions to any approval of the proposed site plan to help ensure that impacts
on surrounding properties are mitigated and the quality of life of the adjacent communities is not
diminished. Conditions of approval ensuring the compatibility of the proposed use with the
adjacent neighborhoods are discussed in the staff report.
(10) Patterns of development. The proposed use will result in logical, timely, and orderly
development patterns.
Stqff Analysis: The applicant has provided a phasing plan that will result a logical development
pattern. The applicant’s traffic concurrency approval contains a build-out date of December 3 1,
2006. This will ensure a timely development pattern.
(11) Purpose and intent. The proposed use will be in harmony with the general purpose
and intent of this chapter and the goals, objectives, and policies of the City.
Stuff Ana4ysis: Staff has reviewed the proposed expansion of use and found it to be in harmony
with the intent of the City’s LDRs and the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Comprehensive
Plan.
(12) Adverse impact. The design of the proposed use and structures will minimize any
adverse visual impacts or impacts caused by the intensity of the use.
Stqff AnaZvsis: Staff has required a photometric study to ensure the impacts of glare are addressed.
Noise impacts are addressed by conditions of approval requiring the applicant to (1) comply with
the applicable noise and decibel requirements set forth in the City’s Code of Ordinances; and (2)
explore opportunities to utilize sound absorbingdampening building materials in the new buildings
and provide, in writing, details of the materials/methods to be utilized to reduce the impact relative
to sound on adjacent properties. The proposed site plan is designed such that impacts on
surrounding properties are sought to be mitigated so that the quality of life of the adjacent
communities is not diminished. Nevertheless, the visual impacts and other impacts on the
4
i
community will be affected by the size of the site and the increased activities at the site. Conditions
of approval to ensure the impacts have been mitigated have been proposed to be a part of any
approval and are discussed in the staff report.
(13) Environmental impact. The design of the proposed use minimizes any adverse impacts
that may be created, including impacts on environmental and natural resources
including air, water, storm water management, wildlife, vegetation, and wetlands.
Staff Analvsis: Staff has reviewed the proposed development plan and determined that any adverse
impacts on environmental and natural resources have been minimized.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Based on staffs analyses above (1) the requested expansion of the ancillary uses, in staffs opinion,
is incidental and subordinate to the principal sanctuary use and is thereby consistent with provisions
of the LDRs; and (2) the development plans and the conditions placed upon the operation of the
Church by staff both have been designed and structured such that the proposed expansion of the use
COMPLIES with the City’s Conditional Use Criteria established in Section 78-52 of the LDRs.
5
A T ORDINA
ORDINANCE 20,1997
iCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITl
5/1/97
9/5/97
10/16/97
11/6/97
11120197
OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR
APPROVAL OF THE PETITION OF PALM BEACH
GARDENS CHRIST FELLOWSHIP CHURCH FOR
REZONING OF TWENTY (20) ACRES OF LAND LOCATED
ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF NORTHLAKE
BOULEVARD AND GIBSON ROAD TO A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT, IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A CHURCH
SANCTUARY AND RELATED FACILITIES; PROVIDING
FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND, PROVIDING FOR
AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Palm Beach Gardens received a petition fiom Palm Beach
Gardens Christ Fellowship Church for rezoning of 20 acres of land located on the northeast
corner of Northlake Boulevard and Gibson Road to a Planned Unit Development;
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Department has reviewed said petition and
determined that it is sufficient; and
WHEREAS, the petition is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, hereby
approves the petition of Palm Beach Gardens Christ Fellowship Church for rezoning of 20 acres
of land located on the northeast corner of Northlake BouIevard and Gibson Road to a Planned
Unit Development, in order to construct a church sanctuary and related facilities.
SECTION 2, Said Planned Unit Development is approved subject to the following
conditions:
1. Prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit, a boundary plat shall have been
prepared, approved by City Council, and recorded in the public records of Palm
Beach County.
Ordinance 20,1997
Page 2
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit, all necessary permits shall have
been obtained from South Florida Water Management District, Health and
Rehabilitative Services, and Palm Beach County.
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the property owner or successor
must obtain a driveway connection permit from Palm Beach County for the
Northlake Boulevard entrance.
If at any time the City determines that maintenance of the grass parking area is in
disrepair or poor appearance, the City may require the owner or successor to
correct the deficiency within thirty (30) days of receipt of written notice. Upon
failure by the owner or successor to comply in the time provided, the City may
require the parking area to be totally or partially paved within one-hundred-fifty
(1 50) days of receipt by owner or successor of written notice. All such paving
shall be conducted according to City standards at the time of paving. All costs
shall be the responsibility of the owner or successor.
The landscaping and irrigation of Northlake Boulevard and Gibson Road as
provided for in the plans shall be completed prior to the issuance of the first
Certificate of Occupancy. The owner or successor shall be responsible for the
perpetual maintenance of said landscaping.
The northern open space shall be used for recreational open space. No drive-aisles
shall be extended to the northern green area or off-site to the east without approval
by City Council.
The church sanctuary and related facilities and surrounding grounds shall be used
by members only for regularly scheduled services, including services on
Christmas Day and Easter Day, and for no more than six (6) additional events per
calendar year. The church sanctuary and related facilities shall not be leased,
rented or in any way made available for use as an auditorium, theater or similar
gathering place for nonmember events of any kind. Regularly scheduled services
shall be defined as services occurring on Saturday evening, Sunday morning, and
a mid-week evening.
All applicable municipal and county impact fees shall be payable
contemporaneous with issuance of the first Building Permit.
The owner or successor shall not utilize a loudspeaker, sound amplifier, radio,
phonograph, or similar sound amplifling device to emit any form of sound outside
the church sanctuary and related facilities.
The owner or successor shall utilize police or equally trained officials at all
ingress and egress points along Northlake Boulevard for the management of
Ordinance 20,1997
Page 3
traffic flow and direction before and after all events, including regularly scheduled
events. The petitioner shall maintain a minimum of three (3) police or equally
trained officials at all times for the direction and contol of traffic entering and
exiting the site. As a guideline, traffic on Northlake Boulevard shall not be
stopped for more than 90 seconds during the traffic control period.
1 1. The four trdfic lanes located at the western portion of the site which provide
access to/from Northlake Boulevard shall be utilized as follows:
a) Following all services and events, traffic cones or other similar traflic
devices shall be utilized so as to limit ingress to the site to one (1) lane;
egress shall be provided via two (2) left-turn lanes and one (1) right-turn
lane.
b) During all other times, two (2) lanes shall be used as inbound lanes and
two (2) lanes shall be used as outbound lanes.
12. The number of fixed andor moveable seats within the sanctuary shall at no time
exceed 1,750.
13. Prior to the issuance of the fmt building permit, the petitioner shall submit a
revised lighting photometric plan, indicating a maximum 20-foot high light poles,
for the City’s approval.
14. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the petitioner shall erect a 6-
foot wall along the site’s northern property line.
15. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy, the petitioner shall install a
3-fOOt grass berm adjacent to the northern limit of the paved parking aisle on the
site. No parking shall occur in the area north of the parking lot and berm.
SECTION 3. Construction of the Palm Beach Gardens Christ Fellowship Church
Planned Unit Development shall be in compliance with the following plans on file with the
City’s Growth Management Department:
1.)
2.)
3.)
4.)
5.)
6.)
November 12, 1997 Site Plan, Glen Pate & Associates, Sheet SP-1.0
October 1, 1997 Architectural Elevations, Glen Pate & Associates, Sheets A-1.0 through A-
3 .O
October 28, 1997 Conceptual Floor Plan and Section, Glen Pane & Associates, 2 sheets
November 14, 1997 Landscape Plan, George G. Gentile & Associates, Sheet L-1
January 24,1997 Landscape Elevations, George G. Gentile & Associates, Sheet L-2
February 21, 1997 Landscape Elevations, George G. Gentile & Associates, Sheets L-3
through L-5.
Ordinance 20,1997
Page 4
7.)
8.)
November 3,1997 Irrigation Plan, George G. Gentile & Associates, Sheet 1-1.
September 30,1997 Conceptual Drainage Plan, Kidey-Horn and Associates, Sheet C-1.0
SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall be effective upon adoption.
,1997.
,,;' - -
C!0UNC~L-~~ LINDA MONROE
-L ,-
- COUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND
LINDA V. KOSIER CMC, CITY CLERK SUFFICIENCY.
VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT d
r/
MAYOR RUSSO ---
VICE MAYOR FURTADO ---
COUNCILWOMAN MONROE - r/
COUNCILMAN JABLIN -- /-
COUNCILMAN CLARK J--
G:\SHORTR- 1 WUD9604. OR
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
io500 N. MILITARY TRAIL PALM EACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410-4698
November 24,1997
Pastor Thomas D. Mullins
Christ FelIowship Church
53 12 Northlake Boulevard
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
Dear Pastor Mullins:
Enclosed is a copy of Ordinance 20, 1997, providing for approval of the petition of Palm Beach
Gardens Christ Fellowship Church for rezoning of twenty acres of land located on the northeast
corner of Northlake Boulevard and Gibson Road to a PUD, in order to construct a church sanctuary
and related facilities.
Ordinance 20, 1997 was adopted and approved by the City Council at the Regular Meeting on
November 20,1997.
Sincerely,
u Cindy Harvey
Deputy City Clerk
Enclosure: As Stated
October 27,1997
Amendment to Ordinance 20,1997
The text of proposed Ordinance 20,1997, as approved on first reading, shall be amended as
follows:
A. Amend Section 2, condition #2 by spelling out the abbreviations, so that it shall read:
2. Prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit, all necessary permits shall have been
obtained from EF’?.?vE, E??, South Florida Water Management District. Health and Rehabilitative
Services. and Palm Beach County.
B. Amend Section 2, condition #3, by inserting at the beginning of the sentence “prior to the
issuance of the first Building Permit”, so that it shall read:
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the property owner or successor must obtain a
driveway connection permit from Palm Beach County for the Northlake Boulevard entrance.
C. Amend Section 2, condition #4, by deleting the proposed condition:
D. Amend Section 2, condition #5, by renumbering the condition to #4; inserting after the
first word (if) the words ‘at any time’; deleting the word “finds” on the first line and inserting the
word ‘determines’; deleting on the second and third lines the words “shall notify the property owner
or successor, in writing that,” and inserting the words “may require the owner or successor to correct
the defi~iency’~; deleting on the fourth line the words “said notice the deficiencies shall be rectified”
and inserting the words “receipt of written notice”; deleting on the fifth through seventh lines the
sentence “Should the deficiencies not be corrected within said thirty (30) days, the City may require
the parking area to be totally or partially paved to City standards within one hundred fifty (1 50) days
upon written notification.” and inserting two new sentences which read “Upon failure by the owner
or successor to comply in the time provided, the City may require the parking area to be totally or
partially paved within one hundred fifty (1 50) days of receipt by owner or successor of written
notice. All such paving shall be conducted according to City standards at the time of paving.”: so
that it shall read:
owner or successor to complv in the time provided. the Citv mav require the parking area to be
totallv or partiallv paved within one-hundred-fifty (1 50) days of receipt by owner or successor of
written notice. All such paving shalI be conducted according to City standards at the time of paving.
All costs shall be the remonsibilitv of the owner or successor.
E. Amend the Section 2, condition #6, by renumbering the condition to #5; deleting all
verbiage and replacing it with new language so that it shall read:
F. Amend Section 2, condition #7, by renumbering the condition to #6; inserting the words
“the northern open space shall be used for recreational open space” as a new first sentence; deleting
the word ‘non-sodded’ after the word ‘no’ and before the word ‘drive-isles’; deleting the word
‘open’ and after the word ‘northern’ and before the word ‘green, so that it shall read:
6% The northern open space shall be used for recreational open space. No ;;cz-&kG drive-
isles shall be extended to the northern open green area or off-site to the east without City Council
approval.
G. Amend Section 2, by adding a new condition #7, which reads as follows:
7. The church sanctuary and related facilities and surrounding gounds shall be used by
members only for reqlarlv scheduled services. including services on Christmas Day and Easter Day,
and for no more than six (6) additional events per calendar year. The church sanctuary and related
facilities shall not be leased. rented or in any way made available for use as an auditorium. theater
or similar gathering place for non-member events of any kind. Regularly scheduled services shall
be defined as services occurring on Saturday evening. Sundav mornin?. and a mid-week evening.
H. Amend Section 2, by adding a new condition #9, which reads as follows:
9. The owner or successor shall not utilize a louds-maker. sound amplifier. radio. phonogmnh.
or similar sound amplifving device to emit anv form of sound outside the church sanctuary and
related facilities. -
I. Amend Section 2, by adding a new condition #lo, which reads as follows:
10. The owner or successor shall utilize police or eauallv trained officials at all ingress and
egress points along Northlake Boulevard for the management of traffic flow and direction before and
after all events. includintj regularlv scheduled events. The -petitioner shall maintain a minimum of
three (3) -police or quallv trained officials at all times for the direction and contol of traffic entering
and exiting the site. As a guideline. traffic on Northlake Boulevard shall not be stopped for more
than 90 seconds during the traffic control period.
J. Amend Section 2, by adding a new condition #I 1, which reads as follows:
1 1, The four traffic lanes located at the western portion of the site which provides access
to/from Northlake Boulevard shall be utilized as follows:
a) Following all services and events. traffic cones or other similar traffic devices shall be
utilized so as to limit ingress to the site to one !l) lane: egress shall be provided via two (2) left-turn
lanes and one (1) right-turn lane.
b) During all other times. two f2) lanes shall be used as inbound lanes and two (21 lanes shall
be used as outbound lanes.
K. Amend Section 2, by adding a new condition #12, which reads as follows:
12. The number of fixed and/or moveable seats within the sanctuary shall at no time exceed
1,750.
L. Amend Section 2, by adding a new condition #13, which reads as follows:
13. Prior to the issuance of the first building Demit. the Detitioner shall submit a revised
liehtine Dhotometric ~lan. indicating a maximum 26foot hiuh light Doles. for the City’s amroval.
M. Amend Section 2, by adding a new condition #14. which reads as follows:
14. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. the petitioner shall erect a 6-foot
wall along the site’s northern property line.
N. Amend Section 2, by adding a new condition #15, which reads as follows:
15, Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancv. the petitioner shall install a 3-foot
grass berm adjacent to the northern limit of the paved parkins aisle on the site. No muking shall
occur in the area north of the parkin? lot and berm.
Amendment 1 to Ordinance 20,1997
Page 3
0. Amend Section 3, exhibit 1, to replace the “November 1,1997 Site Plan, Glen Patte &
Associates, Sheet SP-1.0” with “November 12, 1997 Site Plan, Glen Pate & Associates, Sheet SP-
1 .O“; exhibit 2, to replace the “February 14, 1997 Architectural Elevations, Glen Patte & Associates,
Sheets A-1.0 through A- 3.0“ with “October 1, 1997 Architectural Elevations, Glen Pate &
Associates, Sheets A-1.0 through A- 2.0”; to replace the “February 14, 1997 Conceptual Floor Plan,
Glen Patte & Associates, Sheet A-4.0” with “October 28,1997 Conceptual Floor Plan and Section,
Glen Patte and Associates, 2 Sheets; exhibit 3, to replace the “August 28, 1997 Landscape Plan,
George G. Gentile & Associates, Sheet L-1“ with “November 14,1997 Landscape Plan, George G.
Gentile & Associates, Sheet L-1”; exhibit 6, to replace the “August 7, 1997 Irrigation Plan, George
G. Gentile & Associates, Sheet 1-1.” with “November 3,1997 Irrigation Plan, George G. Gentile &
Associates, Sheet 1-1.”; exhibit 7, to replace the “November 1, 1997 Photometric Site Plan, Glen
Patte & Associates, Sheet PSP-1.0”; exhibit 8, to replace the “September 3, 1997 Conceptual
Drainage Plan, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Sheet C- 1 .O” with the “September 30,1997 Conceptual
Drainage Plan, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Sheet C-1 .O”. so that Section 3 will read :
November 12, 1997 Site Plan, Glen Pate & Associates, Sheet SP-1.0
October 1, 1997 Architectural Elevations. Glen Pate & Associates, Sheets A-1 .O through A-
3.0
October 28,1997 Conceptual Floor Plan and Section, 2 Sheets
November 14, 1997 Landscape Plan, George G. Gentile & Associates, Sheet L-1
January 24, 1997 Landscape Elevations, George G. Gentile & Associates, Sheet L-2
February 21, 1997 Landscape Elevations, George G. Gentile & Associates, Sheets L-3
November 3,1997 Irrigation Plan, George G. Gentile & Associates, Sheet 1-1.
September 30,1997 Conceptual Drainage Plan, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Sheet C-1.0
through L-5.
Amendment 1 to Ordinance 20,1997
Page 4
G:\SHORTR-1 \PUD9604.0~3
April 26,1999
May 21,1999
June 24,1999
July 15,1999
ORDINANCE 23,1999
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR
APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 20,
1997 TO PROVIDE FOR MINOR CHANGES IN THE
ELEVATIONS AND FLOOR PLANS OF BUILDINGS A, B,
AND C IN THE CHRIST FELLOWSHIP PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL, AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE
DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has received an application from Christ Fellowship Inc. to amend
ordinance 20, 1997 to provide for minor changes in the elevations of Buildings A, B and C and to
the floor plan of Building A within the Christ Fellowship Planned Unit Development; and
WHEREAS, Christ Fellowship was approved by Ordinance 20,1997; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Growth Management Department has determined that this request is
minor in nature; and
WHEREAS, the City’s Growth Management Department has determined that approval of
said application is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Land Development
Regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, approves an
amendment to Ordnance 20, 1997 to provide for minor changes in the elevations and floor plans of
Buildings A, B and C within the Christ Fellowship Planned Unit Development.
SECTION 2. Said approval shall be subject to the following conditions, which shall be the
responsibility of the applicant, its successors andor assigns:
1. All of the conditions from Ordinance 20, 1997 shall remain in full force and effect.
(Planning & Zoning)
2. Buildings A and B shall not be used as overflow areas or for supplemental seating for
1
presentations, programs, or semons conducted in the Sanctuary. (Code Enforcement)
I
3. Simultaneous broadcasts of presentations, programs, or sermons conducted in the Sanctuary i
I
to any remote location, on-site or off-site, shall be prohibited. (Code Enforcement)
4. Building A shall be limited to a capacity of 452 people. (Code Enforcement)
SECTION 3. Said approval shall be consistent with plans and documents filed with the
City’s Growth Management Department as follows:
1. March 19, 1999 Architectural Site Plan, Glenn Pate & Associates, Sheet SP- 1.
2. May 18, 1999 Building B Elevations (Children’s Education), Glenn Pate & Associates, Sheet A-1
3. June 25, 1999 Building B Floor Plan, Glenn Pate & Associates.
4. May 18, 1999 Building A Floor Plan (Youth Ministry), Glenn Pate & Associates, Sheet A-2.
5. May 18, 1999 Building A Elevations, Glenn Pate & Associates, Sheet A-3.
6. May 18, 1999 Building C Elevations, Glenn Pate & Associates, Sheets A-4, A-5.
7. May 11, 1999 Letter from Glenn Pate & Associates.
,
I
SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall be effective upon adoption.
PLACED ON FIRST WADING THIS 17’ DAY OF June 1999.
PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS
INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED
-
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM !
I
2
VOTE?
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR FURTADO
COUNCILMAN SABATELLO
COUNCILMAN JABLM
COUNCILMAN CLARK
AYE NAY ABSENT
\WSERVER\COMPROG\ShortRange\MISC9909 RE doc
I
I
3
THE PALM BEACH POST
Published Daily and Sunday
West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida
I PROOF OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
Before the undersigned authority personally appear W. Ortado who on oath says that
he is Classified Advertising Supervisor of The Palm Beach Post, a hly and Sunday
newspaper published at West Palm Beach in Palm Beach County, Flonda, that the attached
copy of advertising, being a Notice in the matter of ORDINANCE 23,1999 in the --- Court,
published in said newspaper in the issues of June 30, 1999.
Miant further says that the sad The Post is a newspaper published at West Palm Beach, in
said Palm Beach County, Flonda, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been
conhnuously published in said Palm Beach County, Flonda, dady and Sunday-and has been.
entered as second class ma11 matter at the post office in West Palm Beach, in said Palm Beach
County, Florida, for a penod of one year next precedmg the first publicahon of the attached
copy of advertisement, and affiant further says that shelhe has neither paid nor promised any
person, firm or corporabon any discount rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of
secunng this advertisement for publication in the said newsp per pVW-
Sworn to and subscnbed before hs 30 day of June, A.D. 1299
Personally known a or Produced Identification
Type of Idenhfizon Produced
i = NO. 6677W
I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIWQ
BY THE CITY COUNCIL .-
4 30 i m , eG;btioiho)lGp.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED. Net If anu harh
I i
!
I
I I
I
I
j
!
I
I
I
I
!
I
I
I
i
t
I
I
I
4
i
1 i
I
i !
I i
I
I
i I
J b
December 3, 1990
December 20, 1990
0H)INANCE 30, 1990
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH
GARDENS, FLORIDA, REZONING LANDS DESCRIBED IN
EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO UNDER THE CURRENT
AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL, WITH A SPECIAL
EXCEPTION ALLOWING EXPANSION OF EXISTING
COMMERCIAL HORSE STABLES TO THE CITY'S ZONING
DISTRICT TOGETHER WITH A CONDITIONAL USE OF A
CHURCH AND AN ACCESSORY USE THEREWITH OF A
PRESCHOOL; FURTHER, THE SITE AND ELEVATION
PLAN PREPARED BY GLENN PATE AND ASSOCIATES,
CONSISTING OF THREE (3) SHEETS AND ATTACHED
HERETO AS COMPOSITE EXHIBIT "B" IS HEREBY
CONCEPTUALLY APPROVED; AND, PROVIDING FOR THE
REPEAL OF ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF
ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; AND,
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
PALM amcH COUNTY ZONING DESIGNATION OF
CLASSIFICATION RS-1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL I
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH
GARDENS, FLORIDA:
Section 1. The zoning classification of those particular
lands described in Exhibit "An attached hereto, under the current
Palm Beach County Zoning designation of Agricultural Residential
with a special exception allowing expansion of existing
commercial horse stables are hereby rezoned to the City's zoning
classification RS-1, Single-Family Residential District, together
with a conditional use of a church and an accessory use therewith
of a preschool.
Section 2. The Site Plan and Elevation Plan pertaining
thereto prepared by Glenn Pate and Associates, consisting of
three (3) sheets and attached hereto as Composite Exhibit @'B" are
hereby conceptually approved.
Section 3. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in
conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall be effective upon date of
passage.
6 ' DAY OF DECEMBER, 1990. DAY OF DECEMBER, 1990.
Jc' DAY OF DECEMBER, 1990.
'v: ,< _' i /-2 1' '--
/ /. '
MAYOR MARTIN0
VICE MAYOR ALDRED
ATTEST :
CLERK A~PROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
CITY ATTORNEY
January 30, 1991
RESOLUTION 13, 1991
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS,
FLORIDA, APPROVING THE SITE PLAN FOR THE
IMPROVEMENTS OF THE PALM BEACH GARDENS CHRIST
FELLOWSHIP CHURCH, AND, PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
- Section 1- The City Council hereby approves the Site
Plan, Landscaping Plan and Elevation Plans of the Palm Beach
Gardens Christ Fellowship Church, hereinafter described and
attached hereto as Composite Exhibit "A":
Site and Landscaping Plan prepared by Glenn Pate
and Associates, revised on December 19, 1990,
consisting of Sheet SP1.0.
North and East Elevations prepared by Glenn Pate
and Associates, dated November 13, 1990, consisting
of sheet A2.0.
Undated west and South Elevations prepared by Glenn
Pate and Associates, received by Staff on November
14, 1990, consisting of Sheet A3.0.
Section 2- The following conditions shall be part of
the development plan:
1. The church and caretaker's residence shall tie into
potable water service prior to the issuance of the
first Certificate of Occupancy; and, within 180 days
after sewer lines become available to the subject
property, the church and caretaker's residence shall
tie into them.
2. The petitioner shall obtain a grading and drainage permit from Northern Palm Beach County Water Control
District. A Grading Plan will be required if the slope
or top of bank is regraded or if the exotics are
removed.
3. If the City finds that maintenance of the grass parking
area is in disrepair or poor appearance, the City shall
notify the property owner that within 30 days of said
notice the deficiencies shall be rectified. Should the
deficiencies not be corrected within said 30 days, the
City may require the parking area to be totally paved
to City standards within 150 days upon notification.
applicable re lations, including the removal of all
4. Subsequent phases and expansions shall comply with all
exotics on EI~ r e.
5. Prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupan-
cy, site lighting shall be reviewed and approved by
the Police Department.
1
6.
7.
8.
9.
A dumpster (3' tall, 3' deep, 6-7' wide) shall be
placed at the end of the westernmost drive aisle, at
the edge of pavement, and shall have a concrete slab of
no less than 10' wide and 8' deep.
A 6' fence or wall (to match the church exterior)
shall be erected on three sides of the dumpster with
two S'(minimum) gates.
The exterior of the church shall be painted Pearl Grey
(MAB 309 16P) and the exterior trim, columns, entrance
features and tower shall be painted white (MAB 409 160)
Lighting along the westerly property line shall be
permitted at a maximum of 20', shielded from the
adjacent properties. The City reserves the right to
require the Petitioner to remove lighting along the
westerly property line within 30 days upon written notification.
Section & This Resolution shall be effective upon
date of passage.
INTRODUCED, PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS THE 7 DAY OF FEBRUARY,
1991.
ATTEST :
MICHAEL MARTINO, MAYOR
&pdM3dM% KOSIER, CITY CLE
2
November 2,1999
RESOLUTION 86,1999
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, AMENDING
RESOLUTION 13,1991 APPROVING A SITE PLAN FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS “CHRIST FELLOWSHIP”
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NORTHLAKE
BOULEVARD WEST OF MILITARY TRAIL, IN ORDER TO
APPROVE CERTAIN INFRASTRUCTURE
IMPROVEMENTS; PROVIDING FOR AMENDMENT TO
RESOLUTION 4, 1997 TO GRANT A TIME EXTENSION
FOR THE TEMPORARY CONDITIONAL USE FOR
MODULAR UNITS ; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has received an application from Christ Fellowship Inc. for an
amendment to the approved site plan and other documents for the development known as “Christ
Fellowship” located approximately 3/4 mile west of Military Trail on the south side of Northlake
Boulevard, as more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto, to allow the construction
of additional parking and other infrastructure improvements, and to extend the effective date of the
time extension for the modular units, and
WHEREAS, Christ Fellowship’s conditional use was approved by the City Council by
Ordinance 30, 1990 on December 20, 1990, and amended by the City Council by Ordinance 34,
1999 on September 16,1999, and
WHEREAS, Christ Fellowship’s site plan was approved by the City Council by Resolution
13, 1991 on February 7, 1991, and
WHEREAS, Christ Fellowship’s temporary modular units were approved by the City
Council by Resolution 4, 1997 on January 2, 1997, and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application and
determined that it is sufficient, and
WHEREAS, the City’s Growth Management Department has determined that approval of
said application is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Land Development
, e e
B. Complete all non-landscape site improvements and changes.
C. Remove the modular units from the property.
D. Pave all parking aisles per City code. (DevelopmentCompliance Officer)
4. Within 90 days of the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the sanctuary on
Christ Fellowship’s new campus on the north side of Northlake Boulevard (as referenced in
Ordinance 20, 1997 as amended), the petitioner shall tie this project into the public sewer
system. (Development Compliance Officer)
SECTION 4. Construction of said development shall be consistent with plans and documents on
file with the City’s Growth Management Department as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
June 7, 1999 Existing South Campus Site Plan, Glen Pate & Associates, Sheet SP 1 .O
August 5,1999 Future Phase 2 Site Plan (date stamped October 28, 1999) Glen Pate
& Associates, Sheet SP 1 .O
June 16, 1999 Existing (as-built) Landscape Plan, Glen Pate & Associates, Sheet L-1
October 26, 1999 Proposed Landscape Plan, Glen Pate & Associates, Sheet L-2
September 4, 1999 Stormwater Management Plan (Church Site), Kenneth H. Kruger,
P.E.
September 7, 1999 (date stamp)Conceptual Drainage Plan (Full Buildout), Kenneth
H. Kruger, P.E., Sheets 1-2
August 5, 1999 Future Phase 2 Photometric Site plan, Glenn Pate & Associates,
Sheet ESP 1.0
SECTION 5. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
PASSED AND ADOPTED THIS ‘f DAY
ATTEST:
LINDA V. KOSIER
BY: v
APPROVED AS TQ LEGAL FORM AND
SUFZ@& ,
d
W
CITY ATTORNEY
VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT
- - MAYOR RUSSO J
VICE MAYOR FURTADO --- J
COUNCILMAN JABLIN - r/
J- COUNCILMAN CLARK
COUNCILMANSABATELLO J
omIr I IC
June 24,1999
June 30,1999
August 27,1999
July 2,1999
I, 1s
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GAKDENS, FLORIDA, AMENDING
ORDINANCE 30, 1990 WHICH APPROVED A
CONDITIONAL USE, TO ALLOW AN INCREASE IN THE
MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY AT THE SITE KNOWN AS
“CHRIST FELLOWSHIP” WHICH IS GENERALLY
LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NOKTHLAKE
BOULEVARD WEST OF MILITARY TRAIL, AND TO
AMEND THE APPROVED USE OF THE RESIDENCE
BUILDING TO A YOUTH CENTER; PROVIDING FOR
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND PROVIDING FOR AN
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has received an application from Christ Fellowship Inc. to amend
Ordinance 30, 1990 to allow an expansion of the conditional use and a change in use for the
residence to a youth center for a property more particularly described in Exhibit “A” (attached), and
WHEREAS, Christ Fellowship’s conditional use was approved by Ordinance 30, 1990, and
WHEREAS, Christ Fellowship’s site plan was approved by Resolution 13, 199 1, and
WHEREAS, Christ Fellowship’s temporary modular units were approved by Resolution 4,
1997, and
WHEREAS, the City’s Growth Management Department has determined that approval of
said application is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Land Development
Regulations, and
WHEREAS, the City’s Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended approval of
this request, with conditions,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, approves an
I I
!
I I I
I
i I I I I
I
I
,
I
i
I i i
i
I
I
j
j
1 ! !
! !
i
i
1
!
I
I
I
I
I ! I
I
i i
I
I
I !
I
!
I I
i
I
I I
I
amendment to Ordinance 30, 1990 to amend the conditional use to allow a temporary increase in the
maximum occupancy to 768 seats. This amendment shall be valid only until the issuance of the
Certificate of Occupancy for the sanctuary on Christ Fellowship’s new campus on the north side of
Northlake Boulevard (as referenced in Ordinance 20, 1997 as amended) or until January 1 , 2000,
whichever occurs first.
SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, approves an
amendment to Ordinance 30, 1990 to amend the conditional use to allow a permanent increase in
the maximum occupancy to 576 seats. This expansion shall become effective immediately after the
issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the sanctuary for Christ Fellowship’s new campus on
the north side of Northlake Boulevard (as referenced in Ordinance 20, 1997 as amended) or on
January 2,2000, whichever occurs first.
SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida approves an
amendment to Ordinance 30, 1990 to amend the approved use of the residence to a youth center.This
amendment shall take effect immediately upon adoption.
SECTION 4. Said approval shall be subject to the following conditions, which shall be the
responsibility of the applicant, its successors and/or assigns:
1. Immediately upon the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the new sanctuary for Christ
Fellowship on the north side of Northlake Boulevard (as referenced in Ordinance 20, 1997 as
amended) or by January 2,2000, whichever occurs first, the minimum parking requirement on this
site shall be calculated at a rate of 1 space per 3 seats in the sanctuary. At that time, one hundred
and ninety-two of the seats in the sanctuary shall be permanently removed, leaving a permanent
occupancy of no more than 576 seats, and an affidavit shall be submitted to the City by the petitioner
affirming that the seating has been reduced to 576 or less. (Development Compliance Officer)
2. Simultaneous broadcasts of presentations, programs or semions conducted at any remote location
to this site shall be prohibited. (Code Enforcement)
3. When determined to be necessary by the City of Palm Beach Gardens Police Department, the
petitioner or successor shall utilize police or equally trained officials in numbers determined by the
Police Department at all ingress and egress points along Northlake Boulevard for the management
of traffic flow and direction before and after events.(Code Enforcement, Police Department)
SECTION 5. Said approval shall be consistent with plans and documents on file with the
City’s Growth Management Department as follows:
1.
2.
June 7, 1999 Existing South Campus Site Plan, Glen Pate & Associates, Sheet SP 1 .O
August 5, 1999 Future Phase 2 Site Plan, Glen Pate & Associates, Sheet SP 1 .O
SECTION 6. This Ordinance shall be effective upon adoption.
1999
1999
1999
PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS
PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS
4
OPTEDTHIS /k
H- L3 c23kA w
LA~JREN FURTADO, VICE MAYOR-
I YOUNCILMAN DAVID CLARK I j
COUNCILMA P- AFX SABATELLO
ATTES'T:
LINDA V. KOSIEK ,CMC, CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND
SUFFICIENCY.
CITY ATTORNEY
VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR FURTADO
COUNCILMAN SABATELLO E-
COUNCILMAN JABLIN -- COUNCILMAN CLARK -~
Y-
w
glshort. sp9703.or.doc
/Jtl&jl
gnrra t'i -A- .
I P.4 I
P. d
!
I
!
I I !
I
I i ! I I
I
I I I
i
I
I I
I
I
.I
I
i
I
1
I ! I !
I
1
i
.! I
,
I I
I-
I
1
i
I
1 I
I
I
'I
!
i
1
1
1
I
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
io500 N. MIUTARY TRAIL PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 3341G4698
September 20, 1999
Mr. David Gregg
53 12 Northlake Blvd.
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 334 18
Dear Mr. Gregg:
Enclosed is a copy of Ordinance 34, 1999, amending Ordinance 30, 1990 which approved a
conditional use, to allow an increase in the maximum occupancy at the site known as "Christ
Fellowship".
Ordinance 34, 1999 was adopted and approved by the City Council at the Regular Meeting on
September 20, 1999.
Sincerely,
Ruth Catt
Administrative Secretary
Enclosure: As Stated
I
I
I
!
I I i
I I
i
! i I
I I
ORDINANCE 51,1999
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, AMENDING
ORDINANCE 34,1999 TO ALLOW FOR AN EXTENSION OF
A DATE CERTAIN CONDITION OF APPROVAL, RELATING
TO THE CALCULATION OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS
FROM JANUARY 2,2000 TO APRIL 1,2000 AT THE SITE
KNOWN AS “CHRIST FELLOWSHIP” WHICH IS
GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD WEST OF MILITARY TRAIL;
AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has received an application from Christ Fellowship Inc. to amend
Ordinance 34, 1999 to allow for an extension of the date certain of condition of approval # 1
(relating to the calculation of parking requirements) from January 2, 1999 to April 1,2000; and
WHEREAS, Christ Fellowship’s conditional use was approved by Ordinance 30, 1990; and
WHEREAS, Chst Fellowship’s conditional use was expanded and amended by Ordinance
34,1999, and
WHEREAS, the City’s Growth Management Department has determined that approval of
the requested amendment to Ordinance 34, 1999 is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan
and Land Development Regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, hereby approves
Christ Fellowship Inc’s request for an extension of time and amends condition of approval ## 1 as set
forth in section 4 of Ordinance 34, I999 to read as follows:
1. Immediately upon the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the new sanctuary for
Christ Fellowship on the north side of Northlake Boulevard (as referenced in Ordinance 20, 1997
as amended) or by ,Tzxzry 2 April 1, 2000, whichever occurs first, the minimum parking
requirement on this site shall be calculated at a rate of 1 space per 3 seats in the sanctuary. At that
time, one hundred and ninety-two of the seats in the sanctuary shall be permanently removed,
leaving a permanent occupancy of no more than 576 seats, and an affidavit shall be submitted to the
City by the petitioner afirming that the seating has been reduced to 576 or less.
SECTION 2. Said approval shall be consistent with documents on file with the City’s
Growth Management Department as follows:
7
~
I
I
1. Development Application stamped November 10, 1999.
SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall be effective upon adoption.
PLACED ON FIRST READING THIS 16Ih DAY OF DECEMBER 1999
PLACED ON SECOND READING THIS 20th DAY OFJANUARY 2000
ATTESTED BY: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND
C, CITY CLERK SUFFICIENCY.
J /"
qTY ATTORNEY
VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT
L, -- MAYOR RUSSO
COUNCILMAN SABATELLO
COUNCILMAN JABLIN
COUNCILMAN CLARK
VICE MAYOR FURTADO -- d
/
1
-- -- / --
8
I
RESOLUTION 5,2000
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA, AMENDING
RESOLUTION 86,1999 TO ALLOW FOR AN EXTENSION
OFA DATE CERTAIN CONDITION OF APPROVAL
RELATING TO THE COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS
ON THE SITE KNOWN AS “CHRIST FELLOWSHIP”,
WHICH IS GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE
OF NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD WEST OF MILITARY
TRAIL; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City has received an application from Christ Fellowship Inc. to amend
Resolution 86, 1999 to allow for an extension of the date certain of condition ## 3 relating to site
improvements from January 2,2000 to April 1, 2000 and to allow 30 days after April 1,2000 to
complete all such improvements; and
WHEREAS, Christ Fellowship’s conditional use was approved by Ordinance 30, 1990, and
WHEREAS, Christ Fellowship’s site plan was approved by Resolution 13, 1991, and
WHEREAS, Christ Fellowship’s temporary modular units were approved by Resolution 4,
1997, and
WHEREAS, Christ Fellowship’s amendment to its site plan was approved by Resolution 86,
1999, and
WHEREAS, the City’s Growth Management Department has determined that approval of
said application is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan and Land Development
Regulations, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA:
SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, hereby approves
Christ Fellowship Inc.’s request for an extension of time and amends condition of approval #3 as set
forth in Section 3 of Resolution 86, 1999 to read as follow:
Within 30 days of the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the sanctuary on Christ
Fellowship’s new campus on the north side of Northlake Boulevard (as referenced in Ordinance 20,
1997 as amended) or eff-b~ _Tzzzry 2 May 1,2000, whichever shall first occur, the petitioner shall:
A. Close the access point between this site and the Church of the Nazarene to the west,
7
B.
C.
D.
Complete all non-landscape site improvements and changes.
Remove the modular units from the property.
Pave all parking aisles per City code. (Development Compliance Officer)
SECTION 2. Said approval shall be subject to the following condition which shall be the
responsibility of the applicant, its successors andor assigns:
Immediately upon the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the sanctuary
on the north campus of Christ Fellowship, shuttle bus or any other type of
transportation service between the north and south campuses shall cease.
SECTION 3. Said approval shall be consistent with documents on file with the City’s
Growth Management Department as follows:
1. Development Application stamped November 10, 1999.
SECTION 4. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption.
INTRODUCED, PASSED, AND ADOPTED
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND
CITY ATTORNEY
VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT
L---
L
MAYOR RUSSO ~___
VICE MAYOR FURTADO --
COUNCILMAN SABATELLO --
COUNCILMAN JABLIN --
COUNCILMAN CLARK --
-
Lc
cc
8
(47)
(48)
(49)
LAND DEVELOPMENT Q 78-159
Interior design, including sales. Sale of goods and merchandise is permitted in the PO
zoning district; however, maintaining an inventory or goods and merchandise is
prohibited.
Veterinary office and clinic. Veterinary office and clinic excludes offices with kennels or
overnight boarding facilities unless soundproofed and approved as a conditional use.
Churches and places of worship shall comply with the standards provided below.
a. Less than 1,000 permanent seats or approved capacity may be located as a
conditional use in any residential zoning district, and in CG-1, CG-2, and P&I
zoning districts.
More than 1,000 permanent seats or approved capacity may be located as a
conditional use in the following districts: CG-1, CG-2, PI, M-1, M-lA, and M-2.
mical uses associated with churches and places of worship include the follow-
ing:
1. Sanctuaries, assembly halls, or similar large meeting rooms where religious
services are held;
Community centers or fellowship halls, which may be the site of religious
services, but also used for community, athletic, fraternal, social, civic,
charitable, and recreational programs;
Offices utilized for administrative purposes related to the operation of the
church or place of worship;
b.
c.
2.
3.
4. Religious merchandise or merchandise related to the operation of the house
of worship may be sold in an accessory retail facility;
Playgrounds and athletic fields; and
Rectory or similar residence for religious officials, limited to one per place of
worship.
The following uses may be included within any conditional use approval granted
by the city council to establish a church or place of worship, or as an additional
conditional use operating as part of the facility:
1. School, elementary or secondary;
2. Day care, child;
3. Day care, adult;
4. Assisted living facility; and
5. Monastery or convent.
Additional standards applicable to churches and places of worship are provided
below.
1. Up to 50 percent of required parking may be grassed consistent with section
78-373 of this chapter.
Minimum lot size is two acres.
5.
6.
d.
e.
2.
Supp. No. 10 CD78:143
5 78-159 PALM BEACH GARDENS CODE
3. Churches and places of worship with more than 1,000 seats or approved
capacity shall be located on and provide primary vehicular access from the
following roadways: city collector, county minor arterial, state minor arte
rial, state, or state principal arterial.
Lighting for athletic fields, parking lots, and security shall be shielded from
adjacent residential zoning districts.
All day care centers, elementary or secondary schools, monasteries or
convents, or assisted living facilities shall provide primary vehicular access
from the following roadways: city collector, county minor arterial, state
minor arterial, state, or state principal arterial.
Temporary uses such as special events, outside services, seasonal sales, seasonal
displays, other events of a limited nature may require a special events permit or
approval as required in section 78-187.
4.
5.
f.
Governmental uses. Governmental uses include a city hall, police station, fire station,
branch courthouse, public office buildings, libraries, maintenance buildings, etc.
Hospital, public or private. Public or private hospital includes those institutions
providing primary, secondary, or tertiary medical care, emergency medical services,
including preventive medicine, diagnostic medicine, treatment and rehabilitative
services, medical training programs, medical research, and may include association
with medical schools or other medical institutions.
Post office. Post office means a retail- and service-oriented facility providing individual
post office boxes, sale of stamps and other postal services, receipt and distribution of
mail, and other functions as a distribution, sorting and delivery facility.
Post office, accessory. Accessory post office means a satellite, unstaf€ed facility for
receipt of md, sale of postal products via vending machines, and similar convenience
fLUlCtiOnS.
Schools, public or private. Public or private schools are public or private elementary or
secondary schools conducting regular classes with a course of study approved by the
Florida Department of Education. AU schools shall comply with the standards listed
below.
a.
b.
Shall conform to all city concurrency requirements.
Shall connect to public water and sewer treatment systems, or other systems
approved by the city and the county health department.
Shall be approved as a conditional use.
Shall conform to all applicable environmental standards and requirements.
Shall conform to all city landscaping requirements.
Shall dedicate, at no cost, any necessary rights-of-way or easements for roads,
canals, drainage, or public or private utilities.
c.
d.
e.
f.
Supp. No. 10 CD78:144
r4
OONSUL‘IING (ML ENGINEERS,
SURVEYORS & WPEW
QVIL
AGRTCULTURAL
WATER RESOURCES
WATER &WASTEWATER
TRANSPORTATION
SURVEY & MAPPING
GIS
“Partners For Results
Value By Design”
3550 S.W. Corporate Pkwy.
Palm City, FL 34990
(772) 286-3883
Fax (772) 286-3925
www.lbfh.com
MEMORANDUM
R
TO: Michael Sanche
FROM: Judy A. T. Dye
DATE: March 17,2005 w
FILE NO. 03-4299
SUBJECT: Christ Fellowship Church
Traffic Impact Analysis Review
The City’s traffic consultant, MTP Group, Inc., and Palm Beach County Traffic
Division have completed their coordinated review of the Traffic Impact Analysis
prepared by Imley-Horn & Associates, Inc. dated February 22, 2005 pursuant to
the Palm Beach County Traffic Perfonnance Standards and City of Palm Beach
Gardens Land Development Regulations for the above referenced project.
Based on their review, the City’s traffic consultant and PBC Traffic Division
concur with the analysis presented and provide recommendations as stated in the
attached comment memorandum from MTP Group, Inc. dated March 15,2005.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate
to contact me at (772) 286-3883.
JATDhcl
cc: Tala1 Benothman - PBG (tbenothman@,pbdl.com)
Maria Tejera, P.E. - MTP Group (mtpm-oup@,earthlink.net)
Masoud Atefi - PBCTD (-
Don Hearing - Cotleur Hearing (don hearinn@,cotleur-heariny.com)
Doug Rhudy - Christ Fellowship (doumhudv@,cftodav.org)
\\pc\proj ectsWBGMEM0\4299\4299zp.doc
P. 2 3- 1 6-285 1 D : 38AM FROM MTP GROUP INC WPB FL t1 561 7958230
,’
MTP Group, Irac.
12798 Farest Hill Boulevard. Suits 303
Wellin ton. FL 33414 Phone: (561) 795-0678 Telefax: &6l) 795-0230
i
Co&: Masoud Atefi, MSCE
’ Palm Beach County
To: Judy A. T. Dye
LBFH, hc.
From: Marla M. Tcjera, P.E.
Date: March 15,2005
Palm Beach County and MTP Group have perfomled a coordinated review lor the project
referenced above. We have reviewed a letter prepared by Wey-Horn and Asswiates, Inc.
dated February 22, 2005. The letter includes responses to commaits about a traMic smdy dated
December 2,2004 which was prepared to address the following:
1. A traffic plan identifjlhg trafEc chidation during the peak hour of the church.
2. A traffic study evaluating hadway conditions along the dimtly access segment of
Nortkiake Boiilevard and at the intersection with Militdry Trajl during the peak-
hour of the church.
The study shows that during the peak hour of the chusch, both the eastern and western driveways
are projected to operate at level of service “‘E” using Highway Capacity Maslplal procedures. Using
a different methodology, Syncro, thc level of servicc at both driveways is pjected to be “I>”. It
nmst be noted that these conditions are expected to occur Sunday betweb 11:OO a.m. and 1200
noon. Most likely, the levels of service presented above would od$ occur during 15 to 20
minutes.
The analysis indicates the 11:45 a.m. Sunday seeruice will be moved to 12:OO noon in order to
spread traffic during the peak hour of the church. Also, a traflic management plan is discussed in the December 2,2004 trafFrc study.
We concur with the analysis presented and recoannend the foilowing:
1. Move the 1 1 :45 am. Sunday service to 12:OO moa
2. Include police control during p& periods (e.&. Swr3ay servicc). Four policmm
are needed to control traffic along Northlakc Bodevard (two on each driveway per
direction).
3. Provide trafxic circulation as included in the traffic analysis md attached as
Exhibits 1. and2.
4. Monitor traffic conditions at the driveways as well as iriteinal traffic circulation to-
minimize traffic impact to Northlakc Boulevard.
Should you need additional information, do not hesitate to co~tacl me at (561) 735-0678.
3-16-285 1€3:38AM FROM MTP GROUP INC wpe FL. ti 561 795~250 P. 3
I
EXHIBIT 1
n
3-16-205 18:31AM
I 6,
L
FROM MTP GROUP INC WPB FL t1 561 79582:Q
I
P. d
I
NORTH CAh'IPUS MASTER StTE PLAN Q
t ,I
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS,
SURVEYORS & MAPPERS
CIVIL
AGRICULTURAL
WATER RESOURCES
WATER & WASTEWATER
TRANSPORTATION
SURVEY & MAPPING
GIS
“Partners For Results
Value By Design”
3550 S.W. Corporate Pkwy.
Palm City, FL 34990
(772) 286-3883
Fax (772) 286-3925
www.lbfh.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: MIahael
FROM: Judy A. T. Dye
DATE: January 6,2005 \J
FILE NO. 03-4299
SUBJECT: Christ Fellowship Church
Traffic Impact Analysis Review
The City’s traffic consultant, MTP Group, Inc., and Palm Beach County Traffic
Division have completed their coordinated review of the Traffic Impact Analysis
prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. (dated December 2, 2004) pursuant to
the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards and City of Palm Beach
Gardens Land Development Regulations for the above referenced project. The
City’s traffic consultant and PBC Traffic Division request revisions to the report. A
copy of MTP Group’s coordinated comment memorandum dated January 5,2005 is
attached. Please note this memorandum includes additional comments to MTP
Group’s DRAFT comment memorandum dated December 15,2004.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate
to contact me at (772) 286-3883.
JATD/ph
cc: Tala1 Benothman (via fax (561) 799-4281 w/attachment)
Maria Tejera, P.E. - MTP Group (mtpProup@earthlink.net w/o attachment)
Masoud Atefi - PBCTD (matefi@,co.palm-beach.fl.us w/o attachment)
Don Hearing - Cotleur Hearing (via fax (561) 747-1377-w/attachment)
Doug Rhudy - Christ Fellowship (via fax 561 -622-8445 w/attachment)
1-85-285 4144PM FROM MTP GROUP INC WPB FL t1 561 7958238 P. 2
i ~3.+2c?~
MTP Group, Inc. 12798 Forest Hill Boulevard. Suite 303 Welli on; FL 33414 Phone: (561) 795-0678 Telefax%l) 795-0230
To: Judy A. T. Dye
LBFH, hc. 3ors From.: Maria M. Tejera, P.E.
Date: January 5,2005
Subject: Christ Fellowship Church
Copy: Masoud At&, MSCE
Palm Beach County
Per your request, we have iwiewed a letter prepared by K,imley-Horn and Associates, Inc. dated
December 2,2004. This letter WBS prepared in response to comments dated November 10,2004
regarding the following analyses for the above subject property:
1. A trafh plan idmtifj4ng traffic circulation during the peak hour of the church. The
plan needs to evaluate internal circulation as well as adequacy of existing
driveways, turning lanes and storage, traffic control, and safety devices. 2. A tr&c study evaluating poadway conditions along the directly access segment of
Northlake Boulevard and at the intersection with Military Trail during the peak
hour of the church.
We offer the following comments:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7,
a.
9.
Turning movement counts should be conducted at all project driveways to ckennine both existing traffic and project traffic assignment. This comment was
included in our previous memorandum and it has not been addressed in the letter.
The analysis used to &tennine observed trip generation should be included in the
letter.
Project traffic assignment should be based on existing turning movement counts.
While the letter indicates assignment was based on existing turning movements,
turning movements at the &ern driveway were not considered, as they were not
included in the analysis.
Observed count data was not attached to the copy of the letter we received.
We recommend SurnMarzing existing h-affic volumes and turning movements in a figure in order to expedite the review process.
Provide a figure clearly illustrating Sunday peak hour volumes at dl driveways.
It seems like a peak hour factor of 0.4 was used for project traffic when analyzing
the driveways. It is suggested to apply a growth factor of 60% to project traflic
along Northlake Boulevard and use of a peak hour factor of 0.4 at the driveways.
In order to determine adequacy of turn lane storage, an evaluation needs to bc
conducted to compare available storage versus forecasted queues.
The consultant needs to suggest traffic management mitigation to expand the arrival
and departure times.
Should you need additional infornxition, do not hesitate to contact me at (56 1) 795-0678.
c ~OCW~ d srm~uc~ DOCW-LV~W~~ ~dl0-t~~ ~h&-~~paarm~- a U,,MI
c
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS,
SURVEYORS &MAPPERS
CIVIL
AGRICULTURAL
WATER RESOURCES
WATER & WASTEWATER
TRANSPORTATION
SURVEY & MAPPING
GIs
“Partners For Results
Value By Design”
3550 S.W. Corporate Pkwy.
Palm City, FL 34990
(772) 286-3883
Fax (772) 286-3925
www.lbfli.com
MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael
FROM: Judy A. T. Dye
DATE: November 1 1,2004
FILE NO. 03-4299
SUBJECT: Christ Fellowship Church
Traffic Impact Analysis
The City’s traffic consultant, MTP Group, Inc., has completed their review, and
prepared draft comments, of the letter and updated traffic analysis prepared by
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. dated September 23,2004 for conformance with
the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards and the City’s Land
Development Regulations for the above referenced project. Their review concludes
additional information is required for review. Please note we are awaiting any
comments from the Palm Beach County Traffic Division.
A copy of MTP Group’s comment memorandum dated November 10, 2004 is
attached.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate
to contact me at (772) 286-3883.
JATD/jal
cc: Tala1 Benothman - PBG (tbenothman@pbafl.com)
Maria Tejera, P.E. - MTP Group (mtPaoup@,earthlink.net) -
Masoud Atefi - PBCTD (matefi@,co.palm-beach.fl.us) -
Don Hearing - Cotleur Hearing (don hearindi2cotleur-hearing.com)
Doug Rhudy - Christ Fellowship (dounrhudy@,cftodav.org)
1 1-1 8-284 5:85PM FROM MTP GROUP INC WPB FL t1 561 7950230 P. 2 .
~.. . . . ..
MTP Group, Inc-
12798 Forest Hill Boulevard. Suite 303
Wetfington, FL 33414 Phone: (561) 79W76 Telefax: (581) 795-0230
MEMORANDUM
To: Judy A. T. Dye
LBFH, fnc.
From: Maria M. Tejera, P.E.
Date: November 10,2004
Subject: Christ Fellowship Church
Per yo= request, we hme reviewed a letter preprsd by Kimley-Horn imd Associates, Lnc. &td Septmber
23,2004. This letter was prepared in response to comments on July 2004 which required the following
analyses:
1 - A Mc plan identifying traffic circulation during the peak bow of the church. The plan
needs to evaluate internal circulation as %el1 3s adequacy of existing driveways, turning
lams and storage, traffic control, and safety devices.
2. A traffic study evaluating roadway conditions along the directly access segment of Northlake Boulevard and at the intersection with Military Trail during the peak hour ofthe
church.
The letter clearly identifies the peak hour of the church occurring on Sunday between I 1 :00 am and 12:OO
noon. It also contains an analysis of roadways conditions along Northlake Boulevard in the year 2006
(bbuildout of the project) during the peak hour of the church. It in~l~dss signalized intersection analysis at
the two project driveways along Northlake Boulevard as well as at the intersection of Military Trail and
Northlake Boulevard. However, it does not include the td3c plan required under item 1 above.
We off= the following comments:
1. Turning movement counts should be conducted at all project driveways to determine both
existing traf3c and project Wc assignment.
2. Project trafXic assignment should be based on existing turning movement counts rather than
information included in the approved July 2004 traff;ic study,
3. Existing trip generation should bo compared with that calculated using the ITE Trip
Generation Repor&. The ITE trip generation rate used to estimate trips may not be valid as
the proposed church falls outside the values included in the ITE Trip Generation Report.
A justifiabletrip genemtion rate should be used to estimate trip generation at buildout ofthe
project.
plan identifying trafic circulation during the peak hour of the church should be prepared. The plan needs to evaluate internal circulation as well as adequacy of existing
driveways, turning lanes and storage, trflic control, and safety devices,
5, The analysis assumes both driveways along Northlake Boulevard are signalizsd at buildout
of the project. Is the developer installing the signals? Have they been approved? If not,
please idmtifjl Mc control and safety devices to be used during the peak how of the
church on Sunday.
6. Consistent with the approved traffic study, the Military Trail/Northlake Boulevard
intersection analysis needs to include traffic divorsjons due to the Northlake Reliever.
4, A
Should you need additional information, do not hesitate to contact me at (561) 795-0678.
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS,
SURVEYORS &MAPPERS
CIVIL
AGRICULTURAL
WATER RESOURCES
WATER & WASTEWATER
TRANSPORTATION
SURVEY & MAPPING
GIs
“Partners For Results
Value By Design”
3550 S.W. Corporate Pkwy.
Palm City, FL 34990
(772) 286-3883
Fax (772) 286-3925
www.lbfh.com
TO: Michael Sanchez
FROM: Judy A. T. Dye
DATE: July 30,2004
FILE NO. 03-4299
SUBJECT: Christ Fellowship Church
Traffic Impact Analysis
The City’s traffic consultant, MTP Group, Inc, have completed their review of the
revised Trip Impact Analysis dated July 2004 prepared by Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Inc. for conformance with the Palm Beach Gardens Traffic
Performance Standards for the above referenced project. The site currently
includes 85,200 square feet of development on the north campus and 2 1 , 100 square
feet of development on the south campus. The proposed expansion increases the
north campus to 245,200 square feet while maintaining the existing development
on the south campus. The proposed buildout date of the development has been
analyzed for the year 2006. Therefore, the City’s traffic consultant finds the project
in compliance with the City of Palm Beach Gardens Traffic Performance Standards
subject to the following condition: “Conversion of the existing westbound right-
turn lane to a shared througldright lane, at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard
and Military Trail.” In addition, in order to identify traffic impact to the adjacent
roadways during the peak hours of the church, the applicant shall address the
comments prepared by MTP Group. A copy of MTP Group’s comment
memorandum dated July 28,2004 is attached.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate
to contact me at (772) 286-3883.
JATD/cpr
cc: Tala1 Benothman - PBG (tbenothman@,pbgfl.com)
_~- ~ P. 2 7-29-204 1 0 : 32AM FROM MTP GROUP INC WPB FL tl 561 795823c3 03-%-&Vt - C'
1. 7 '8
MEMORANDUM
To: Judy A. T. Dye
LBFH, Inc.
From: Maria M. Tejera, P.E.
Date: July 29, 2004
Reference: Christ Fellowship Church
Copy Masoud Atefi, MSCE
Palm Beach County
MTP Group has completed a review of a revised traffic impact analysis prepared by Kirniey-Horn and
Associates, Inc. dated July 2004 for the project referenced above pursuant to the City of Palm Beach
Gardens Traffic Performance Standards. Christ Fellowship is located along Northlake Boulevard to the
west of Military Trail. The site currenrly includes 85,200 squm feet of development in the north campus
and 2 1,100 square feet of development in the south campus, The proposed expansion increases the north
campus to 245,200 square feet while maintaining the existing development in the south campus. Buildout
of the development has been analyzed for the year 2006.
We find the project in compliance with the City of Palm Beach Gardens Traffic Performance Standards
subject to the following condition:
1, Conversion of the existing exciosive westbound right-turn lane to a shared throughhight-
turn lane, at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Military Trail.
In order to identify traffic impact to the adjacent roadways during the peak hours of the church, the
following analyses are required:
1. Provide a traffic plan identifying tr.affic circulation during the peak hour of the church
(usually Saturday or Sunday). The plan needs to evaluate internal circulation as well as
adequacy of existing driveways, turning lanes and storage, traffic control, and safety
devices.
2. Provide 8 traffic study evaluating roadway conditions along the directly accesg segment
of Northlake Boulevard and at the intersection with Military Trail during the peak hour
of the church (usually Saturday or Sunday).
Additional eaflc related issues may arise during ~JZQ site plan approva f process. The Ciiy of Palm Beach
Gdem may impose troflc condirionr in the Development Order to mswe safe, convenient undorderbflow
ofvehicular @aflc within the Ciy.
Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to give us a call at (561) 795-0678.
c
CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEERS,
SURVEYORS & MAPPERS
CIVIL
AGRICULTURAL
WATER RESOURCES
WATER & WASTEWATER
TRANSPORTATION
SURVEY & MAPPING
GIS
“Partners For Results
Value By Design”
/’\ w
3550 S .w. c
Palm
Fax
MEMORANDLM
TO:
FROM: Judy A. T. Dy
DATE: August 10, 2004w
FILE NO. 03-4299
SUBJECT: Christ Fellowship Church
Traffic Impact Analysis
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has completed their review of the revised
Trip Impact Analysis dated July 2004 prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates,
Inc. for conformance with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards
for the above referenced project. The site currently includes 85,200 square feet of
development on the north campus and 21,100 square feet of development on the
south campus. The proposed expansion increases the north campus to 245,200
square feet while maintaining the existing development on the south campus. The
proposed buildout date of the development has been analyzed for the year 2006.
The report notes that the Trip Impact Analysis meets the Traffic Performance
Standards of Palm Beach County subject to the following condition: “Conversion
of the existing westbound right-turn lane to a shared throughhight lane, at the
intersection of Northlake Boulevard and Military Trail.” In addition, in order to
identify traffic impact to the adjacent roadways during the peak hours of the
church, the applicant shall address the comments prepared by MTP Group.
A copy of MTP Group’s comment memorandum dated July 28, 2004 was
previously sent on July 30,2004.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate
to contact me at (772) 286-3883.
JATD/mef
cc: Tala1 Benothman - PBG (tbenothman@,pbnfl.com)
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
P.0. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, FL 33416-1229
(561) 684-4000
www. pbcgov. co m
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Karen T. Marcus. Chair
Tony Masilotti, Vice Chairman
Jeff Koons
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Addie L. Greene
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
‘An Epl Opportunity
Afimative Action Employer”
July 16, 2004
Ms. Judy A. T. Dye
LBFH Inc.
Assistant City Engineer
City of Palm Beach Gardens
3550 S.W. Corporate Pkwy.
Palm City, FL 34990
RE: Christ Fellowship Church Expansion
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Judy:
Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic study for the proposed
expansion project entitled; Christ Fellowship Church Expansion, pursuant to the
Traffic Performance Standards in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Land
Development Code. The project is summarized as follows:
Location: Worth side of North!ake Boulevard, East of Hunt Club Lane
Municipality: Palm Beach Gardens
Existing Uses: 85,200 SF Church -- the existing church also includes 21,100 SF
across the siree! on the South side of Northlake Boulevard.
Proposed Uses: Addition of 160,000 SF Church
New Daily Trips: 1,458
New Daily Trips: 116 AM, 106 PM
Build-out Year: 2006
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the proposed expansion
meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County, under the following
condition:
0 Cmversion of the existing excksive west!!oUrid i-ight-turn lax tc 2 siialeci
throughlright turn lane, at the intersection of Northlake Boulevard with Military
Trail. If for any reason, implementation of this change in lane configuration was
not feasible, the developer will need to commit to other improvements at this
intersection, to improve peak hour traffic operations to acceptable levels.
It is also suggested:
A “Traffic Circulation Plan” to be developed providing an analysis of the project
traffic circulation conditions during the church peak demand periods (whish may
be during events un weekends). This plan needs tc evaluate the adequacy of
turn !anes and stxages, as well as traffic control and safety devices.
0 The County is concerned over ihe high Rumber of peak hour ieft-tLii-ns.
forecasted to exit out of the site onto Northlake Reulevard, from both driveway’s
on the northern parcsl. It is suggested that outgoing left-turns be hmiled to one
main driveway, controlled by adequate traffic control and safety devices.
@) printed on recycled paper
c
No building permits are to be issued by the town, after the build-out date, specified
above. The County traffic concurrency approval is subject to the Project Aggregation
Rules set forth in the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
Masoud Atefi. MS '. Sr. Engineer 1 Traff&Dtv&on
CC: Lorin Brissett, P.E. -Kirnley-Horn & Associates
Maria Tejera, P.E. - MTP Group
File: General - TPS - Mun - Traffic Study Review
/
A
U I j j j j j j j j j .j j j j
j
j
j
j
j
j i
j
j
j
j
j
j
I
.I
i
T
T L
-El--@ m
0
8
N I- 0
@
A\\essler & Associatcs
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
7741 N. Military Trail, Suite 5, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
Phone (5611 841-8188 Fax (5611 841-8140
DRAINAGE STATEMENT
CHRIST FELLOWSHIP CHURCH
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL
OCTOBER, 2004
(REV. APRIL, 2005)
The proposed development is an addition to the existing Christ Fellowship Church that will
consist of approximately 157,000 sf of buildings that will house meeting and dining rooms. The
buildings and the required parking will be constructed on approximately 20 acres of land. The
proposed facility will be located adjacent and east of the existing Christ Fellowship Church
building. The project is located within the jurisdiction of Northern Palm Beach County
Improvement District.
The drainage system for the project will consist of conventional water management facilities,
including a series of dry retention areas, grassed swales, inlets, drainage piping and an outfall to
the Ballen Isles master drainage system. In addition to the drainage for this new phase, it is
proposed to receive a portion of the drainage runoff from the existing phase. The existing phase
one currently has periods of time when the outfall system does not function as efficiently as
originally anticipated, therefore the water levels on the property reach stages higher than
anticipated. We believe that the cause of this condition is that the current outfall is through
Northlake Blvd. and the project discharge is subject to conditions within the roadway that delays
the time when the Church’s project can discharge. It is planned to redistribute a portion of the
existing storm water management system and route it through the new phase drainage system.
Once this system is in place this will eliminate the high water levels in phase one.
The proposed outfall system for the new phase two will be controlled through the use of a
control structure located at the northeast comer of the northern dry retention area. The outfall
pipe will be connected to an existing pipe that was installed with the Place of Hope project
developed several years ago and is owned by Chnst Fellowship Church. The existing outfall
pipe is a 36” cmp that was designed to receive the runoff from this new project. The final
outfall is in the Ballen Isles lake system that is maintained and operated by Northern Palm Beach
County Improvement District. The allowable discharge is based on the C- 17 basin allowable
discharge of 62.4 CSM. The proposed project will be routed based on this allowable disch
project.
for this new phase and that portion of the phase one that is to be included with the -8 E:
March 29,2005
Michael Sanchez
Senior Planner
Growth Managemen. Department
City of Palm Beach Gardens
10500 North Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
Re: North Campus Expansion of East 20 Acres and Usage of the Planned New Facilities
Dear Michael,
Thank you for your inquiry as to the usage of the buildings we are proposing to add to
our existing facilities on Northlake Blvd. Basically, it is all about our children! We need
more “indoor” space for our kids’ programs.
The first building to be built, the Student Ministry Center, will be used in the
following manner:
1) Multiple rooms will be added for Middle School age children and for High
School age kids. Rooms for Sunday school, prayer rooms and breakout rooms
will enable us to group (and separate) similar age kids together.
We are now using this same concept in one of our existing buildings which we
call God’s Town. During our regular weekly “adult” services in our main
Sanctuary, we run concurrent services for elementary school children, for fifth
and sixth graders, for middle school and for high school age kids. In an effort to
separate younger children from the older ones, we are adding a Student
Auditorium plus numerous “medium size” breakout rooms to be used at the same
time our normal weekly adult services are taking place.
2) Student Ministry small group worship / theater room
3) Fellowship Hall for families
4) Public meeting rooms for community use
5) Break-out rooms for small group worship
March 29,2005
Page 2
6) Casual areas for pot-luck dinners for families
7) Kids Zone indoor play ground
8) Choir suite for choir practices
9) Administrative ofice areas (primarily upstairs)
Christ Fellowship is very concerned about the safety of our children. By expanding our
North Campus we will be able to accommodate all of our adults and children on the north
side of Northlake Blvd. during regular weekly services, thereby reducing crossover traffic
to our property on the south side of Northlake Blvd.
Phase I of this expansion includes the addition of walls to the porch area in God’s Town.
All zoning requirements have been met regarding parking and engineering for this area.
The elimination of the “outside porch”, along with the addition of the Student Ministry
Center, will enable Christ Fellowship to move our 5& and 6~ grade age children inside for
worship, thus reducing exterior sounds from children playing and worshipping.
The second building to be built, the Family Life Center, will be used in the following
manner:
1) The majority of the square footage is allocated to a gym. Kids and adults from
the community will play basketball, volleyball and other sports in this facility.
2) Dressing Rooms and Work-out Rooms
3) Community Meeting rooms
4) Racquetball Courts
5) Aerobics room for mothers and young children
6) Crafts and other family small group breakout rooms
7) Unfinished areas upstairs will be used for fbture administrative office space,
kids break-out rooms and much needed storage areas
Christ Fellowship owns a small tract of land on Howell Lane (located in the county) that
is adjacent to the northeast corner of the subject East 20 Acre Expansion project. This site
is one of the most special ministries of Christ Fellowship Church. We refer to the barn,
building and horse riding ring as our “Special Needs Ministry.”
Christ Fellowship
Palm Beach Gardens Wellington 561-799-7600 + 561-799-7602 www.gochristfellowship.com
March 29, 2005
Page 3
Almost every Saturday literally hundreds of Special Needs’ children, teenagers and
parents from the community (most do not attend Christ Fellowship) participate in a
“Hippo-Therapy” program. This horse-back riding and animal therapy program has
broken down barriers within families, has given handicapped children and young adults
in our community ways to communicate, exercise, and relate to animals and people of all
ages in unbelievable ways! We plan to continue using this property for our Special Needs
Ministry in the future.
Michael, please call me if you need any additional information. Thank you for your
interest and assistance on this project.
Sincerely, * Director of Development
cc: Don Hearing
Glenn Pate
Ron Ferris
Tala1 Benothman
Christ Fellowship
Palm Beach Gardens Wellington 561-799-7600 561-799-7602 www.aochristfellowship.com
bW OFFICES
BOOSE CASEY ClKLlN LUB~ MARTENS MC6ANE & O’CONNELL
A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS
JOSEPH L. ACKERMAN, P.A.
LINDA DICKHAUS AGNANT, P.A.
BRUCE 0. ALEXANDER, P.A.
JERALD S. BEER, P.A.
WILLIAM R. BOOSE. 111, P.A.
JOHN D. BOYKIN, P.A.
JESSICA M. CALLOW
PATRICK J. CASEY, P.A.
RICHARD R. CHAVES, P.A.
PATRICIA M. CHRISTIANSEN. P.A.
ALAN J. CIKLIN, P.A.
ROBERT L. CRANE, P.A.
RONALD E. CRESCENZO, P.A.
KENT 8. FRAZER
JEFFREY M. GARBER
JASON 5. HASELKORN, P.A.
VIA FAX 799-4281
and U.S. Mail
CHRISTINE M. HOKE
RICHARD A. JAROLEM
BRIAN B. JOSLYN, P.A.
GREGORY S. KINO, P.A.
CHARLES A. LUBITZ, P.A.
JASON c. MAIER
RICHARD L. MARTENS, P.A.
BRIAN M. O’CONNELL, P.A.
PHIL D. O’CONNELL. P.A.
CHARLES L. PlCKElT
MATTHEW N. THIBAUT
DEAN VEGOSEN, P.L.
GARY WALK, P.A.
BERNARD WILLIAMS, JR.
JOHN R. YOUNG, P.A.
CORY S. ZADANOSKY May 3 1, 2005
PHILLIP D. O‘CONNELL, SR. (I 907- I 887)
LOUIS R. MCBANE (RETIRED)
I---
OF COUNSEL
MICHAEL J. MONCHICK, P.A.
MICHAEL J. KENNEDY, P.A.
JOHN L.REMSEN
LEONARD 0. RUBIN
5 I5 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE, STE. I900
WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 3340 1-4343
P.O. BOX 4626
TELEPHONE: I56 I ) 832-5900
FACSIMILE: (56 I ) 820-038 I
Michael Sanchez, Senior Planner
City of Palm Beach Gardens
Growth Management Department
10500 No. Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida 33410
Re: Christ Fellowship Church PUD AmendmedPUD 0 1 -03/Conditions of Approval North Campus
Dear Michael:
We have been asked to update the Church’s position on the Amendment of certain Conditions of Approval by
virtue of an application filed in April 2001. The Amendment was considered by the Planning, Zoning & Appeals
Board (then the Planning and Zoning Commission) on November 13, 2001 and the Board recommended approval
by a vote of 6-1. At the September 4, 2002 City Council meeting, the City Council requested that the Petition be
postponed until they could also consider a Development Application for the east 20 acres which was heard by the
Planning, Zoning & Appeals Board on May 24, 2005 and recommended for approval by a 7-0 vote. The Church’s
position on the requested Amendment to the Conditions of Approval are as follows:
Condition 1: Shuttle Bus. “Immediately upon the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the sanctuary
on the north campus of Christ Fellowship, shuttle bus or any other type of transportation service between the north
and south campuses shall cease.”
With the addition of the ancillary uses contemplated on the east 20 acres, the need for the use of shuttle buses will
be considerably lessened. One of the benefits of adding the east 20 acres to the Christ Fellowship campus is to
minimize the need for cross-over activity on the south campus. There will be some need, however, to continue the
use of Shuttle buses. It was staffs recommendation at the November 13, 2001 Planning & Zoning Commission
meeting that the condition be eliminated in that the Church was providing “for safe transport of Church members
between two sites that comply with all applicable zoning codes.” The Church agrees with the staff recommendation
that the condition be eliminated.
Condition 7: Special Events Limited to Six Per Year. “The church sanctuary and related facilities and
surrounding grounds shall be used by members only for regularly scheduled services, including services on
Christmas Day and Easter Day, and for no more than six (6) additional events per calendar year. The church
sanctuary and related facilities shall not be leased, rented or in any way be made available for use as an auditorium,
theater or similar gathering place for non-member events of any kind. Regularly scheduled services shall be defined
as services occurring on Saturday evening, Sunday morning, and a mid-week evening.” mmpm $Em
PLANNING &ZONING DEPT,
The Church requested that this condition be eliminated. The staffs recommendation was that “the emphasis of any
restriction should be placed on non-religious events.” Staff recommended that the condition be revised accordingly:
The church sanctuary and related facilities shall not be leased, rented or in any way be made
available for use as an auditorium, theater or similar gathering place for non-member events or
events not directly affiliated with the church’s function or ministry.
The Church agrees with staffs recommended revision.
Condition 9: Outside Sound Amplification. “The owner or successor shall not utilize a loudspeaker, sound
amplifier, radio, phonograph, of (sic) similar sound amplifying device to emit any form of sound outside the church
sanctuary and related facilities.”
Staff recommended the following revised condition.
All audible noises on site shall not exceed applicable noise and decibel level requirements set
forth in the Code of Ordinances. Violation of this condition is subject to Code Enforcement
Procedures.
The Church agrees with staffs recommended condition.
Condition 12: Seats in the Sanctuary. “The number of fixed and/or moveable seats within the sanctuary shall at
no time exceed 1,750 seats.”
The Church requested that this condition be eliminated because sanctuary occupancy should be based on the ability
to meet all Code requirements of the City, including parking, traffic concurrency, fire, building and safety codes.
The seat limitation condition was arbitrary and did not relate to any of the applicable Code requirements.
Staff recommended “the elimination of the condition requiring a maximum of 1,750 fixed and/or moveable seats,
and allowance for a number of fixed and/or moveable seats within the requirements of the concurrency approval and
the Land Development Regulations.”
Staff recommended 2,284 seats. The Church agrees to that number of seats in the sanctuary.
Condition 2: Buildings A and B. “Buildings A and B shall not be used as overflow areas or for supplemental
seating for presentations, programs or sermons conducted in the Sanctuary.”
Staffs recommendation was that “the applicant has indicated that Buildings A and B are not used for overflow
seating. Given the additional seating that may be permitted within the sanctuary building as part of this petition
approval, staff does not recommend deletion of this condition.” Based on the increased number of seats requested
by the Church, the Church agrees to leave the condition unchanged.
Condition 3: Simultaneous Broadcasts.
conducted in the Sanctuary to any remote location, on-site or off-site, shall be prohibited.”
“Simultaneous broadcasts of presentations, programs and sermons
The Church requested elimination of this condition. The original intent of the condition was to curtail traffic control
problems at the north and south campuses of the Church. The staff report indicated that “the police department has
reported no problems related to traffic operations at the site after one full year of operation ....” Staffs
recommendation was as follows:
.
Staff found no evidence of traffic control problems at the entrances to both the North and the
South Campus. Both sites have received approval from the City for religious use with certain
square footage and sanctuary seating. The applicant has also provided staff with a traffic
operations site plan, indicating how traffic is controlled from both campuses. It is staffs
professional opinion that activities occurring on both sites simultaneously do not pose a
significant hazard. The condition, as approved, may not have a rational nexus to the safety, health
and welfare of the City, and is not imposed on any other religious institutions within the City.
Therefore, staff recommends deletion of this condition.
The Church believes the condition should be eliminated.
In conclusion, the Church agrees with the staff recommendation prepared for the November 13, 200 1 Planning &
Zoning Commission meeting. The hearing resulted in a 6-1 vote in favor of the condition changes as set forth
herein.
If you have any questions about the foregoing, please don’t hesitate to contact me.
AJC/nc
28498
cc: Dr. Tom Mullins
Doug Rhudy
Don Hearing
Ron Ferris, City Manager (799-428 1)
Charles Wu, Growth Management Director (799-428 1)
Michael Sanchez
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Leanne Demus [Idemus@hotmail.com]
Friday, May 20, 2005 9:45 PM
Charles Wu
Planning & Zonning Meeting, May 23rd
Dear Mr. Wu,
I have been a resident of Palm Beach Gardens for over 3 years. Additionally, I am employed at Landis Strategy &
Innovation also located in Palm Beach Gardens.
I am a member of Christ Fellowship and I believe in what Christ Fellowship is doing and know that the church is making a
positive impact in our community. It is my desire that the city council support Christ Fellowship's plan to develop land on
their current property.
Thank you for your time and attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
Leanne Demus
3100 Giralda Circle East, #204
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
Powerful Parental Controls Let your child discover the best the Internet has to offer.
http://join.msn.com/?Wmarket=en-ca&page=byoa/prem&xAPID= 1994&DI= 1034
&SU= http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market-MSNIS-tag lines
Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN@ Premium right now and get the first two months FREE*.
1
Michael Sanchez
From: Cara Wingert [carabean423@hotmail.~om]
Sent:
To: Michael Sanchez
Subject:
Monday, May 23,2005 8:32 AM
City Council Meeting Tues May 24th
Good Morning:
My name is Cara Wingert and I am a resident of Palm Beach Gardens. I am writing to let you know that I am a regular
attendee of Christ Fellowship. I believe in what Christ Fellowship is doing and know that the church is making a positive
impact in our community. It is my desire that the city council support Christ Fellowship's plan to develop land on their
current property.
Thank your for taking the time to read my request.
Sincerely,
Cara Wingert
Cara Wingert
1
Michael Sanchez
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
cwpurpose@bellsouth.net
Saturday, May 21, 2005 6:14 PM
Michael Sanchez
Christ Fellowship
We are residents of Palm Beach Gardens & members of Christ Fellowship Church.
We support the proposed building expansion on the ministry campus and hope you will too.
Thank you,
Mr. & ME. Clyde Snyder
1
Michael Sanchez
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Leanne Demus [Idemus@hotmail.com]
Friday, May 20, 2005 9:46 PM
Michael Sanchez
Christ Fellowship Expansion
Dear Mr. Sanchez,
I have been a resident of Palm Beach Gardens for over 3 years. Additionally, I am employed at Landis Strategy &
Innovation also located in Palm Beach Gardens.
I am a member of Christ Fellowship and I believe in what Christ Fellowship is doing and know that the church is making a
positive impact in our community. It is my desire that the city council support Christ Fellowship's plan to develop land on
their current property.
Thank you for your time and attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
Leanne Demus
3100 Giralda Circle East, #204
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
Take advantage of powerful junk e-mail filters built on patented Microsoft@ Smartscreen Technology.
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-ca&page= byoa/prem&xAPID= 1994&DI= 1034
&SU= http://hotmail.com/enca&HL=Market_MSNIS-Taglines
Start enjoying all the benefits of MSN@ Premium right now and get the first two months FREE*.
1
Page 1 of 1
Michael Sanchez
From: Dave Ochs [dive@aquasafari.net]
Sent:
To: Michael Sanchez
Subject: PBG Residents in Support of Christ Fellowship Expansion
Monday, May 23,2005 8:28 PM
Dear Mr. Sanchez,
My name is David Ochs. My wife Jane and I are residents of and registered voters in Palm Beach Gardens. We
are also members of Christ Fellowship Church. I am writing to express our support of the work being done by
Christ Fellowship. The work of this church is having a positive impact on not only the city of Palm Beach Gardens,
but also Palm Beach county, south Florida and throughout the world. We are certainly in support of the church’s
plans to expand on its existing land, and we are asking that you support this expansion as well.
Thank you for your time in reading this message.
Sincerely,
David & Jane Ochs
31 8 Commons Way
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418
56 1-694-2452
5/24/2005
Page 1 of 1
Michael Sanchez
From: Americuba2@aol.com
Sent:
To:
Subject: CHRIST FELLOWSHIP CHURCH
Saturday, May 21, 2005 10:34 AM
Hal Valeche; irusso@pbgfl.com; Jody Barnett; Charles Wu; Michael Sanchez; David Levy; Eric
Jablin
Hello,
I am a regular attender of Christ Fellowhip. I believe in what Christ Fellowship is doing and know that the
church is making a POSITIVE impact in our community. It is my desire that the city council support
Christ Fellowship's plan to develop land on their current property. Thank you in advance for your
attention to this matter.
God bless,
Lourdes Prachyl
5/24/2005
Page 1 of 1
Michael Sanchez
From: Tara Wright [TaraW@cftoday.org]
Sent:
To:
Subject: Christ Fellowship
Friday, May 20, 2005 6:06 PM
Eric Jablin; David Levy; Hal Valeche; Jody Barnett; Charles Wu; Michael Sanchez
Dear Palm Beach Gardens City Council Members & Staff,
I am a member of Christ Fellowship. I believe in what Chst Fellowship is doing and know that the
church is making a great and positive impact in our community. I see it take place every weekend. It is
my great desire that the city council support Christ Fellowship's plan to develop land on their current
property. Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Tara Wright
5/24/2005
Page 1 of 1
Michael Sanchez
From: Trudy [Trudyearle@adelphia.net]
Sent:
To: Joseph Russo
Cc: tmullins@cftoday.org
Subject: planning and zoning of Christ Fellowship
I"
Saturday, May 21, 2005 12:44 PM
Dear Palm Beach Gardens City Council Members & City Staff,
My husband and I have lived in Palm Beach Gardens for nineteen years.
We are members of Christ Fellowship and have been attending and
supporting there for over 11 years. We strongly believe in what Christ
Fellowship is doing (creating good moral/Godly citizens in PBG and
surrounding communities). It should be obvious to all that we are having a
positive impact in this community in both adult and children's lives. It's
our desire that the city council support Christ Fellowship's plan to develop
land on their current property.
Thank you for your time and we look forward to a favorable meeting with
you all this coming Tuesday at the planning and zoning meeting.
Sincerely,
Trudy & Earle Megathlin
FREE Emoticons tor your email! Click Here!
5/24/2005
Page 1 of 1
Michael Sanchez
From: Helen Foust [helenrh@adelphia.net]
Sent:
To: Charles Wu
Subject: Christ Fellowship
-" - "x
Monday, May 23,2005 751 AM
I have been a member of Christ Fellowship since 911 1 and it is my hope that you will vote to approve their application for the
new expansion to the Northlake facility. My biggest reason for urging your support is the fiture of Palm Beach Gardens and
the county. Christ Fellowship's dedication to the next generation will be an asset to this community. Our young people
need the purpose and direction that is instilled in them at Christ Fellowship. I urge you to allow this plan to go forward.
Christ Fellowship seeks only the betterment of the community and its future. Thank you very much.
5/24/2005
Page 1 of 1
Michael Sanchez
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Importance: High
Donna & Barry Atwood [dcatwood@adelphia.net]
Sunday, May 22,2005 1053 PM
Joseph Russo; Eric Jablin; David Levy; Hal Valeche; Jody Barnett; Charles Wu; Michael
Sanchez
Christ Fellowship - Support for Youth Building
Honorable City Council Members,
We strongly urge your support Christ Fellowship's plan to develop land on their current
property for the planned Youth Ministry Center. What a fantastic project, not only for the
Church and its members, but also for the community at large.
We are members of Christ Fellowship and have regularly attended services on
Northlake Boulevard for the past four (4) years. We have witnessed the wonderful
programs the Church sponsors not only for its family members, but also for the benefit
of the community at large. The Church truly supports families at a time when families
are under stress.
We are especially impressed with the youth programs. We only wish our own children
could have taken part while they were growing up and before they went off to college.
This planned project is aimed to benefit the young people of Palm Beach Gardens.
Thank you in advance for your support.
Donna & Barry Atwood
5/24/2005
Page 1 of 1
Michael Sanchez
From: Bethany Bates [batesbethany@yahoo.corn]
Sent:
To:
Subject: PBG Planning & Zoning Meeting
I
Sunday, May 22,2005 9:40 PM
Joseph Russo; Eric Jablin; David Levy; Hal Valeche; Jody Barnett; Charles Wu; Michael Sanchez
Dear City Council Members:
I am a Palm Beach Gardens resident and member of Christ Fellowship.
I believe in what Chst Fellowship is doing and know that the church is making a positive impact in our
community.
Please support our plan to develop land on our current property.
Bethany Bates
9129 W. Highland Pines Blvd.
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 3341 8
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail. y ahoo.com
5/24/2005
Michael Sanchez
From: Henk Horn [horn@yoursecurityconnection.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 4:20 PM
To: Joseph Russo
Cc: David Levy; Michael Sanchez; Charles Wu; Eric Jablin; I:'; Hal Valeche
I am a member and/or regular attender of Christ Fellowship I believe in what Christ
Fellowship is doing and know that the church is making a positive impact in our
community It is my desire that the city council support Christ Fellowship's plan to
develop land on their current property.
Palm Beach Gardens City Council Members & City Staff
Henk Horn
Your Security Connection - E6A-154
& Custom &lectronics
(954) 984-9292 Phone
(775) 587-4366 Fa
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This e-mail message is intended onlyfor the person or entiy to which it is addressedand may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. Ifyou are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies ofthe
original message. Ifyou are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communicationsthrough this medium, please so advise the sender immediately
5/24/2005
Page 1 of 1
Michael Sanchez
From: Michael Whaples [starpastor@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 1 :08 PM
To: Michael Sanchez
Subject: Northlake Development
I am a member of Christ Fellowship. I believe in what Christ Fellowship is doing and know that the
church is making a positive impact in our community. It is my desire that the city council support Christ
Fellowship's plan to develop land on their current property.
Thank you.
Michael & Sandy Whaples
12930 N. Normandy Way
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
5/24/2005
Page 1 of 1
Michael Sanchez
From: Michael@thiscomputer2000.com
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 8:22 AM
To: Charles Wu
Subject: May 24th meeting
Dear Council Member,
I have been a member of Christ Fellowship since 1996 and support
what Christ Fellowship is doing to make a positive impact in our community.
I helped with the building expansion of the north campus in the year 2000 and
it is my desire that the city council support Christ Fellowship's plan
to develop land on their current property to better serve the growth of this community.
Regards,
Michael Runyan
Traffic / Security
FREE 6 mb email address @ http://www.thiscomputer2000.com
5/24/2005
~~ Concerned Palm Beach Gardens Citizen Page 1 of 1
Michael Sanchez
From: Robert-Rice [RRice@officedepot.com]
Sent:
To:
Subject: Concerned Palm Beach Gardens Citizen
Monday, May 23,2005 10:33 AM
Joseph Russo; Eric Jablin; David Levy; Hal Valeche; Jody Barnett; Charles Wu; Michael Sanchez
Dear Palm Beach Gardens City Council-
For the past couple years, I have beena member of Christ FellowshipChurch, and a
resident of Palm Beach Gardens. I have two young children, and my wife and I plan
to make Palm Beach Gardens our home indefinitely. We live in our city year round.
I believe in what Christ Fellowship is doing and know that the church is making a
positive impact in our community.
It is my desire that the city council support Christ Fellowship's plan to develop
land on their current property. Please support our church and our program, as I
believe what is important for the church and the residents of Palm Beach Gardens is
important for our city as well.
Thank you for your time, and all that you do for the city we call home.
Sincerely,
Robertand NataliaRice
104 Tranquilla Drive
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418
5/24/2005
Page 1 of 1
Michael Sanchez
From: Michelle Wall [michelle@etc.fm]
Sent: Monday, May 23,2005 9:49 AM
To: Joseph Russo; Eric Jablin; David Levy; Hal Valeche; Jody Barnett; Charles Wu; Michael Sanchez
Subject: Planning & Zoning
To Whom It May Concern:
Good morning! My name is Michelle Wall and I am a new resident of Palm Beach Gardens. I moved into the
Cypress Hollow development in July, 2004. As a member and neighbor of Christ Fellowship Church I wanted to
take the time to express to you my very strong support of Christ Fellowship. I very strongly believe in what they
are doing and I believe they make a very positive impact on our community. I have never before seen a church
staff that cares more about its member’s and most of all about the children of the community. I myself am a single
mother of a 19 month old little girl. I am so excited about what Christ Fellowship does for all of the children in the
community. I look forward to having my daughter involved with the church as she grows and develops into a
young adult. It gives me so much comfort to think that my daughter will grow with a wonderful group of children
and caregivers and have a wonderful place to grow, learn and play!! I think all parents experience the innate fear
of their children growing up in a very unpredictable world. I have much more comfort as I have seen the children
involved with Christ Fellowship. The staff and volunteers at Christ Fellowship love these children so much and
they really give them a wonderful, secure place to mature into adults. I am excited to see my daughter grow up in
this environment and hope she has the same passion and love of the lord that these children have. Religion
aside, they are loved, they are safe, and they are having fun!!
I strongly support Christ Fellowship’s plan to develop the land on their current property. As a parent, a Christian, a
neighbor and a resident of Palm Beach Gardens, it is apparent to me that it is a benefit to all.
Sincerely,
Michelle Wall
5/24/2005
Page 1 of 1
Michael Sanchez
From: whajup@aol.com
Sent:
To:
Subject: Planning and Zoning Meeting re: Christ Fellowship
Monday, May 23,2005 12:35 PM
Joseph Russo; Eric Jablin; David Levy; Hal Valeche; Jody Barnett; Charles Wu; Michael Sanchez
My wife and I are members of Christ Fellowship. We believe in what Christ Fellowship is doing, and
we know that the church is making a positive impact in our community. It is our desire that the city
council support Christ Fellowship's plan to develop the vacant land on its current property.
Bill and Van Aden
6019 Edgemere Ct.
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
5/24/2005
Page 1 of 1
Michael Sanchez
From: whajup@aol.com
Sent:
To:
Subject: Planning and Zoning Meeting re: Christ Fellowship
Monday, May 23,2005 12:35 PM
Joseph Russo; Eric Jablin; David Levy; Hal Valeche; Jody Barnett; Charles Wu; Michael Sanchez
My wife and I are members of Christ Fellowship. We believe in what Christ Fellowship is doing, and
we know that the church is making a positive impact in our community. It is our desire that the city
council support Christ Fellowship's plan to develop the vacant land on its current property.
Bill and Van Aden
6019 Edgemere Ct.
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
5/24/2005
Page 1 of 1
Michael Sanchez
From: Dave Ochs [dive@aquasafari.net]
Sent:
To: Michael Sanchez
Subject: PBG Residents in Support of Christ Fellowship Expansion
Monday, May 23,2005 8:28 PM
Dear Mr. Sanchez,
My name is David Ochs. My wife Jane and I are residents of and registered voters in Palm Beach Gardens. We
are also members of Christ Fellowship Church. I am writing to express our support of the work being done by
Christ Fellowship. The work of this church is having a positive impact on not only the city of Palm Beach Gardens,
but also Palm Beach county, south Florida and throughout the world. We are certainly in support of the church’s
plans to expand on its existing land, and we are asking that you support this expansion as well.
Thank you for your time in reading this message.
Sincerely,
David & Jane Ochs
31 8 Commons Way
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 3341 8
561 -694-2452
5/24/2005
Page 1 of 1
Michael Sanchez
From: Shirley Bonvento [amybonv@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Monday, May 23,2005 10:06 PM
To: Michael Sanchez
Subject: Christ Fellowship
Dear Mr. Sanchez,
I have been a resident of Palm Beach Gardens for 34 years. I have been a member of
Palm Beach Gardens Christ Fellowship for 12 years. I support the development plan of
the church and hope the city council and city staff will also.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter
Sincerely yours,
Shirley Bonvento
5/24/2005
Page 1 of2
Michael Sanchez
From: Brad Wiseman
Sent:
To: Michael Sanchez
Subject: FW: Church of Christ: variance, zoning, permitted uses
Monday, May 09,2005 151 PM
BRAD WISEMAN
SENIOR PLANNER
10500 N. MILITARY TRAIL
PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL 334 10
Phone: 561-799-4243
Fax: 56 1-799-428 1
Email: bwiseman@,Dbgfl.com
From: Jeffrey Rembaum [mailto:JREMBAUM@becker-poliakoff .corn]
Sent: Monday, May 09,2005 11:18 AM
To: carladcramer@adelphia.net; Catnurse2O@aol.com; DONEGANS2@aol.com; Kerrynjoe@aol.com;
SGHDI@aol.com; Topes11 l@aol.com; ptpl@bellsouth.net
Cc: halrv@adelphia.net; jbarnett@adelphia.net; jabcorp@aol.com; srtinc@bellsouth.net; Brad Wiseman
Subject: Church of Christ: variance, zoning, permitted uses
For those of you who do not know me, my name is Jeff Rembaum, a land use/ community association lawyer
with the law firm of Becker and Poliakoff and a Hunt Club resident. As ususal I have a meeting tonight and
cannot attend. I reviewed the Hunt Club letter. I offer the following comments in my capacity as a Hunt Club
resident. Because I cannot attend I am also forwarding my personal comments to several PBG commissioners.
It is important, pro or con that the commissioners hear from us on these issues. Silence is often mistaken for
consent. Tell them how you feel. We have a very responsive Commission but, they can only address what we
as residents share with them.
This is not a matter of what the church is offering. Rather, it is a matter of what each community needs to co-
exist with the Church. The Church creates unique land use issues and might exceed permitted uses. A careful
reading of the prior ordinances etc will reveal that the Church may or may not be honoring past promises to the
City. All such past promises should be brought to the attention of the Commission. I suggest you do so to
ensure that past promises be honored. My greatest concerns, in order of priority are safety, traffic and noise.
5/9/2 00 5
Page 2 of 2
I offer the following suggestions. The resolution that will be attached to the ordinance or such other conditions
of approval as will be required should specify that
1) Hunt Club Drive shall remain free of church traffic. With only one method of ingress and egress it is far too
dangerous to even consider sharing Hunt Club Drive with the Church. If somebody needed an ambulance for
heart attack or drowning rescue would require a helicopter because we know an ambulance could not fight its
way in.
2) All lighting that borders residential neighborhoods should be unidirectional and required, again by ordinance
or resolution. But for Easter and Christmas no parking lights on past 1O:OO (or whatever time is reasonable). If
not everyone that abuts the church property will feel like they are living in a local where the sun does not set.
3) Turn lane from Northlake to Hunt club drive should be restored as condition of approval . Should be traffic
stacking for at least 6 cars in the turn lane. As it exists its too dangerous. I cannot tell you how many time I
thought I was a goner while turning into our community. I was told that before the church was built the turn
lane was there, but it was taken out. lT MUST BE RESTORED BEFORE SOMEONE DIES!!!
4) A 20 foot concrete sound wall should be constructed to separate Hunt club homes from Church noise and
traffic.
The information in this email and in any attachments is confidential and intended solely for the attention and
use of the named addressee(s). This information may be subject to legal professional or other privilege or may
otherwise be protected by work product immunity or other legal rules. It must not be disclosed to any person
without my authority.
If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are
not authorized to and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it.
Please visit our CALL (Community Association Leadership Lobby) website at httrx//www.callbp.com for all of the
latest information impacting your community association.
..........................................................
IF YOU SEND AN E-MAIL TO ANYONE AT BECKER & POLIAKOFF, P.A. AND DO NOT RECEIVE A RESPONSE
WITHIN 24 HRS, PLEASE CONTACT OUR OFFICE IMMEDIATELY. ..........................................................
Jeffrey A. Rembaum
Becker and Poliakoff, P.A.
Bank of America Centre
625 North Flagler Drive - 7th Floor
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
jrembaumabecker-Doliakoff .com
561-832-8987 fax
561-655-5444
>>> <DONEGANS2@aol.com> 5/9/2005 10:44:38 AM >>>
Count me in!
I think it would be in Hunt Club's best interest if we could ALL attend tonight's meeting. We need to stand strong
and let Christ Fellowship know that we truly care about our community. They have stated that they do want to
work with us, so let's hear what they have to offer.
Hope to see you all tonight!
Jennifer
5/9/2005
Michael Sanchez
From:
Sent:
To: cc: Subject:
Sheryl Stewart
Tuesday, May 10,2005 1058 AM
Charles Ww
Resident Response Team
FW: Christ Fellowship Expansion
Importance: High
Please contact John/Kathy Wallace today and inform them about stars intent to Continue the case at tonight's PZAB
meeting. Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: Patty Snider
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 8:48 AM
To: Resident Response Team
Subject: FW: Christ Fellowship Expansion
Will be placed into the notes section.
Patricia Snider
City Clerk
City of Palm Beach Gardens
Phone: 561-799-4122
Fax: 561-799-4124
Email: psnider@pbgfl.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Kathy Wallace [mailto:Walgroup@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Monday, May 09,2005 7:34 PM
To: Joseph Russo; David Levy; Hal Valeche; Eric Jablin; Jody Barnett; Ron Ferris
Subject: Christ Fellowship Expansion
Dear Elected Official,
As*a resident of the Hunt Club, and speaking for many of my neighbors, we strongly object to Christ Fellowship's
proposed changes to their restrictions and to their proposed expansion and would exhort you to vote to deny their
request. I remember being at the cou,ndil meeting years ago when the church promised not to come back asking for more
if they got the approval for the North Campus. Given their track record and their refqsal to answer questions regarding
future plans such as a school and athletic fields, this massive expansion should be denied.
As it is now, the noise from outdoor events compromises our quality of life and the dangerous traffic situation on
Saturdays, Sundays and Wednesdays forces us to schedule our travel around the church schedule. Having such a huge
and inappropriate usage in an upscald residential area would have dissuaded us from considering our home when we
were house shopping 8 years ago and probably accounts for why realtors tell us our homes do not sell for as much as
they should.
Whether people consider this huge building endeavor to be a commendable thing or not, it clearly doesn't belong in the
middle of quiet residential neighborhoods. Having mammoth 2 story buildings looming over our small neighborhood will
hurt our property values. The intense usage planned for this facility would further erode our home values and cause
inconvenience, noise and traffic problems. Some of the uses and features outlined in their published material include: a
full service bookstore, a food court (restaurant?), cafe, video games, plasma TVs, pool tables, a rock climbing wall and a
1
*
multipurpose room that "wilt accommpdate up to 1,000 people for large-group student activities."
The impact that the neighborhoods suffer from now would be greatly increased if this development is approved. In our
informational meeting with the church it was brought out that there will be classrooms to accommodate 750 people and
that these facilities would also be made available to any group or organization that wishes to use them. The large tour
buses that idle in the parking lot are not conducive to our quiet lifestyle here.
The residents who live in this area don't feel it is acceptable to have to live next to a gymnasium and fitness center,
health club and outdoor basketball and volleyball courts as well as an outdoor baptism pond. All these activities belong in
a commercial area. It was further disclqsed at the meeting that in addition to the existing family members and their
children this facility is intended to serve as a hub for the church's magnet campuses and as a place for teenagers from
broken homes to gather.
The youth oriented games and enticements that act as a magnet for teenagers from outside of P.B.G. to come and hang
out at the church will place a larger burden on the city's resources, such as the police department, which has had to deal
with problems in the past. They can't control the teens that now come on Wednesdqy nights so there will be even bigger
security issues with the expansion. Ttie Hunt Club has already been dealing with problems caused by these teenagers in
our neighborhood and has prompted the board of directors to install a new security gate at our entrance.
The many residents of our surrounding communities know that the meeting tomorrow night will not be in our favor, as the
church has been working closely with a high end Chicago marketing company and a local P.R. firm and has called on its
many members to stack the meeting, but it should be remembered that only 1/3 of Christ Fellowship members are P.B.G.
residents and it is we, the concerned citizens, who live in Palm Beach Gardens.
I
Thank you,
John and Kathy Wallace
2
Page 1 of 2
f
Michael Sanchez
From: Sheryl Stewart
Sent:
To: Charles Wu
cc: Resident Response Team
Subject:
Importance: High
Tuesday, May 10,2005 1059 AM
FW: Christ Church Fellowship Expansion
Please contact Mr. Finizia and inform him about staffs intent to continue the case at tonight's
PZAB meeting.
From: Patty Snider
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 8:46 AM
To: Resident Response Team
Subject: FW: Christ Church Fellowship Expansion
This will be placed into the notes section.
From: Frank Finizia [mailto:tfinizia@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, May 09,2005 5:38 PM
To: Joseph Russo; Eric Jablin; David Levy; David Levy; Hal Valeche; Jody Barnett; Ron Ferris
Cc: Gardens Hunt Club Board of Directors
Subject: Christ Church Fellowship Expansion
Dear City Council Member,
Please remember that in this matter your first responsibility is to the citizens and voters of Palm Beach Gardens
and to stop thiis 'monster' from growing beyond what is already a burden to the neighboring residents and the
local community.
The major factors in my opposition to the proposed Christ Fellowship Church expansion are as follows:
The residential nature of the surrounding neighborhoods is now and will further be compromised by what in fact is
a huge non-residential institution, far beyond any typical church and more akin to an entertainment venue. Traffic,
noise pollution and light spill-over is already unreasonable and will become so much worse.
The proposed uses currently being requested go far beyond reasonable hours and activities typicaly associated
with a church and verge on the commercial and are more like a theme-park than a church and will be ongoing,
every hour of every day - events attended by thousands of people, immediatly abutting private residences of a
5/10/2005
Page 2 of 2
long established residential community with no buffer at all.
Traffic is already negativly impacted by the current level of activities. It is more than a nuisance to those traveling
Northlake Boulevard but also a hazard. (1 must point our one particularly disturbing personal experience. I have
personaly witnessed church personnel standing in the middle of westbound Northlake Boulevard stopping and
directing traffic 'assisting' one, lone PBG police officer.)
Recent on-going incidents of individuals, typicly teens, slipping away from church sponsored activities and
congregating on private and howmeowners association property will become an increased problem with
increased activities. Interestingly, the church initialy took an 'It's not our problem' approach for quite a while and
had to be strongly confronted to take any concern over the matter. Hardly the attitude of a good neighbor..
Good governance demands that you act firmly and decisivly to
1) limit the number (and type) of events allowed,
2) limit the size of events,
3) limit the hours of operation for outdoor events,
4) limit the noise from outdoor events
5) limit the amount and hours of outdoor lighting,
6) mandate a reasonable traffic plan and have competent police personnel directing the traffic - not favoring the
flow to and from the
7) reinstall the right turn cut-out lane for Hunt Club Road,
8) insist upon a realistic security plan to protect neighboring residential areas from tresspassers,
9) most importantly, hold the church to observing the letter and spirit of all previously agreed-upon limitations and
promises and
IO) when the church says 'that's all we are going to ask for' hold them to that also.
church but favoring the public on the public highways,
actually to enforce compliance by the church, and
I don't want to live next to what is fast becoming more like The South Florida Fairgrounds than what could be
reasonably expected from a 'church'.
It's time to say 'NO MORE'.
I'm a regular voter in all municipal elections and will be closely watching your individual position and your voting
record on this matter and will1 activly support and campaign for those who work to protect this community from
more unreasonable intrusion and just as activly oppose and campaigan against those who fail to do so.
Most sincerely,
Frank Finizia
10285 Hunt Club Lane
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 3341 8
Distribution:
Mayor Joe Russo - jrusso@pbgfl.com
Vice Mayor Eric Jablin - eiablin@Dbgfl.com
Council Member David Levy - dlew@p bqfl.com
Council Member Hal Valeche - hvaleche@pbqfl.com
Council Member Jody Barnett - jbarnett@pbqfl.com
City Manager Ron Ferris - rferris@pbnfl.com
CC: Gardens Hunt Club Board of Directors - gardenshuntclub@adelDhia.net
511 0/2005
Board of CopQ Commissioners
Addie L. Greene, Vice Chairperson
Karen T. Marcus
leff Koons
‘ Tony,Masilotti, Chairman
County Admidstrator
Robert Weisman
April 21, 2005
The Honorable Joe Russo, Mayor
City of Palm Beach Gardens
10500 N. Military Trail
information, is a copy of a letter I recently
received from Diane Mahar of Horseshoe Acres Club regarding Northlake Boulevard
and Christ Fellowship Church’s proposed expansion plans.
It appears that her community is working with the church in hopes of
minimizing the impact the expansion will have on their community. Since the
church has a large congregation the impacts have been felt by the surrounding
neighborhoods. I hope that the city will keep those communities in mind when
reviewing the churches plans.
If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact my office.
5- are T. Marcus
dounty Commissioner
KTMIpw
Enclosure
c w/enc: Charles Wu
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
APR 2 5 2005
PLANNING &ZONING DEPT,
“An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer”
P.O. Box 1989, West Palm Beach, FL 33402-1989 (561) 355-2201 FAX: (561) 355-6094
kmarcus@ p bcgov.com printed on recycled paper
Bod of Copty Commissioners
Addie L. Creene. Vice Chairperson
Karen T. Marcus
Jeff Koons
' Tony Masilotti, Chairman
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
April 21, 2005
Ms. Diane Mahar
5285 Travelers Way
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418
Dear Ms. Mahar:
I'd like to acknowledge and thank you for your letter of April 14, 2005
landscaping along Northlake Boulevard and your community.
I would suggest that you have your landscape architect contact Andy Hertel
directly to get the information on the County's rules for landscaping. He can be
reached at 684-4100. I have also asked the County Engineer's Office to look at the
speed limit on Northlake as well as any new traffic lights as you mentioned. When
I receive their comments, I will be back in touch with you.
Since Christ Fellowship Church is in the City of Palm Beach Gardens, I have
shared your concerns with the City on their expansion plans. A copy of my letter to
the Mayor is attached for your review.
Thanks again for writing and I look to forward to working with your
community on the landscaping plans. 1 si n cbr e I y,
cob n ty Qm m i ssi o n er
KTMIpw
Enclosure
"An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer"
P.O. Box 1989, West Palm Beach, FL 33402-1989 (561) 355-2201 FAX: (561) 355-6094
km arcus @ pb cgov. co m @ printed on recycled paper
c
5285 Travelers Way
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 334 18
April 14,2005
Karen T. Marcus, County Commissioner
3 188 PGA Blvd.
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
Dear Ms. Marcus:
This letter is a reply to your letter of January 26, 2005, and the information which you
enclosed from Andy Hertel. Horseshoe Acres Club, Inc. is definitely interested in
pursuing grant funds for landscaping purposes. The homeowners association has hired
Wayne Villavaso Landscape Architecture, Inc. to draw a landscape plan for our border
along Northlake Boulevard including the east and west side of Kelso Drive. Mr.
Villavaso will meet with the association in the next few weeks to submit his ideas and
then follow through with an appropriate plan. Please forward the information that we
need to me at my home address stated above.
,-
Also, please be advised that the association has entered into discussions with Christ
Fellowship about what the church would be willing to do to minimize the impact of the
church expansion on our community. We strongly believe that the speed limit on
Northlake Boulevard should be reduced and traffic lights installed in order to provide for
public safety. In reviewing the expansion plans with the church representatives, we were
apprised of an additional three lane driveway on to the church property which will
provide entry and exit for the substantial amount of traffic created by the expansion. This
additional driveway will be built directly across Northlake from Horseshoe Acres. We
are distressed about the impact the church expansion will have on our quality of life
especially in view of what we are presently enduring from the existing church. We
would appreciate any support and assistance that you may be able to provide in this
matter.
Please call me at home at 622-0532 or work at 434-8015 if you have any questions. I
look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincere 1 y ,
Diane Mahar
C: Horseshoe Acres Club Inc.
Message
Michael Sanchez
Page 1 of 3
From: Sheryl Stewart
Sent:
To: Charles Wu
Subject:
Importance: High
Tuesday, May 10,2005 2:36 PM
FW: Christ Fellowship "Church" Expansion
Please contact this resident and inform as others today. Thanks.
From: Patty Snider
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 12:27 PM
To: Resident Response Team
Subject: FW: Christ Fellowship "Church" Expansion
From: Frank Martino [mailto:frank@martinogroup.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10,2005 12:28 PM
To: Joseph Russo; Eric Jablin; David Levy; Hal Valeche; Jody Barnett; Ron Ferris
Cc: Gardenshuntclub@adelphia.net
Subject: Christ Fellowship "Church" Expansion
I live in the Hunt Club which is adjacent to the Christ Fellowship Church's North Campus
facility. I can't tell you how many times that I have barely escaped being hit by
drivers on their way to attend some function at the Church. Our turn lane is
barely usable. I have difficulty, at times, going East because of fast moving Eest bound
cars turning in front of my waiting car to get into the entrance lane of the "church".
And it is one vehicle after another to the extent that they turn in front of me and also
to the right side (sticking out into the Northern most East bound lane) and also behind
me basically blocking an exit onto Hunt Club Drive. They stack up waiting for West bound
traffic to clear so they can enter the church parking facility. Because these vehicles are
moving quickly and I am stopped in the median, I have little chance of entering the East
5/10/2005
Message Page 2 of 3
bound lanes of Northlake during "churchi' functions. This is another traffic concern that
is rarely discussed and it is an accident waiting to happen.
I share the concerns of my fellow neighbors and those of neighboring communities. We
are being bombarded with people, noise, traffic and unruly, beer drinking teenagers
sneaking into our neighborhood. These teenagers pretend to attend church but in reality
they sneak out of their teen meetings and into our Hunt Club Community park, drink
beer, cause vandalism and scare our young children to the extent that we are concerned
and frightened to send our children to play in our own park when "church'' servcies are
being conducted. Now this "church" (really a huge business enterprise that pay no taxes
with their pastor & other officers living in million dollar plus homes) is wanting to expand
by adding an additional 150,000+ square foot facility and 125 new jobs. The problems
caused by this planned expansion, in addition to the known traffic, noise, vandalism
and crime problems the current facility causes, will only be exacerbated if you allow this
expansion. This expansion, without doubt, will irreparably decrease our property values,
reduce the high quality of life that we have come to expect from Palm Beach Gardens,
increase traffic congestion, accidents and crime. Do your job. Protect US from the
commercialization of our neighborhood and a decrease in the high quality of life we very
much love and expect in Palm Beach Gardens.
Enough is enough. You have been elected to run our city in a way that is both responsible
and in a way that provides a benefit to the majority of your constituents, You are
charged with the responsibility to positively control growth and you should and will be
held accountable. Just look at the traffic, concerns and other
considerations surrounding the Scripts location. Everyone affected by the location of
that facility is concerned with traffic and crime. I believe that there will be nearly as
many people leaving the church's facility as there will be people entering and leaving
the Scripts facility. The problem is that the i'churchii is in a family neighborhood. At
least Scripts will be in a commercial or rural area. This "church" says they have nearly
10,000 families as members. Think of the impact to our community if they are allowed to
grow by another 150,000+ square fee, at their Northlake facility. They have grown to
the WelIington/Royal Palm Beach area and also conduct services in a theater at City
Place. Are all of those people now going to come to the Northlake facility? Thousands
and thousands of additional people coming into our neighborhoods many times each week
will cause a major problem for everyone. There has to be a better location than our
neighborhood for this "church'' so that all of their members can attend in one massive
facility.
I have no personal problem with the church growing. I am just opposed to the fact that
they are attempting to grow to such gigantic size in our suburban neighborhood. The
church should be allowed to expand as much as their congregation and finances will allow,
5/10/2005
Message Page 3 of 3
but only in a more commercially zoned area where "rheir growth will not have un
adverse impact on local communities and neighborhoods.
AS our elected representatives, I sincerely ask you to recognize that this 'khurchtt is no
longer a normal church but a huge business enterprise that needs to be relocated to a
more business and commercial friendly location. I understand that this "Church'' has not
kept their word when they petitioned the city to build the existing facility. If true, what
can we expect next.
I ask for your consideration to those of us who are not members of this "church".
Members, obviously have no problem with the expansion or look past the problems tha
will cause. Please come up with an alternate site so we do not have the equivalent of
it
a Scripts facility or a teen age rehabilitation facility or a college campus, literally, in our
back yard.
Thank you.
Protected by a Spam Blocker Uthty.
Click here to protect vow inbox from Saam.
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.8 - Release Date: 5/10/2005
5/10/2005
Michael Sanchez
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Sheryl Stewart
Tuesday, May 10,2005 2:35 PM
Charles Wu
FW: Christ Fellowship Expansion
Importance: High
Please contact resident below and inform as others today.
Also, shoot me a quick email to let me know that you were able to ,2ave message or make contact with them.
Thanks,
Sheryl
-----Original Message-----
From: Patty Snider
Sent: Tuesday, May 10,2005 12:02 PM
To: Resident Response Team
Subject: Fw: Christ Fellowship Expansion
Patricia Snider
City Clerk
City of Palm Beach Gardens
Phone: 561-799-4122
Fax: 56 1-799-4 124
Email: psnider@pbgfl.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Laurie Adams [mailto: la@kubickidraper.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 9:34 AM
To: David Levy; Hal Valeche; Jody Barnett; Joseph Russo; Ron Ferris; ejablin@pbjfl.com
Cc: www.gardenshuntclub@adelphia.net
Subject: Christ Fellowship Expansion
I am a local attorney, mother, wife, and resident of the Hunt Club. I share the deep concerns of many residents in the
Northlake Blvd area, close to Christ Fellowhip about the huge expansion they seek.
There is no doubt that building a 100K+ square foot facility in our back yard will irreparably disrupt our quiet, suburban
way of life. It will decrease our property values, increase traffic congestion, and raise crime.
Unfortunately, we have had several teenagers from Christ Fellowship sneak into our development when they are
supposed to be at meetings, to drink beer and party at the playground, where our small children play. Christ Fellowship
has met with us about this, and even given us the names of the teenagers doing it, but obviously they will be powerless
to stop it. And, with more people attending, this will only increase.
They have eliminated our turning lane into the Hunt Club. When I turn into my development, there are people going 65
miles per hour right on my tail and I am terrified that one of these days I am going to get slammed. Be certain that if
and when that happens to any member of my community, I will keep a copy of this email as notice to you all for purposes
of future litigation.
1
As our elected representatives, I sincerely ask you to recognize that they are no longer a church but a megaloplis that
belongs in a commercial area. Please come up with an alternate site so we do not have the equivalent of a college
campus, literally, in our back yard.
Thank you.
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed
and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable
laws. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivery to the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, printing, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this
communication may be subject to legal restriction or sanction. ---_____________________________________-------_--------------------------- ----_-__________________________________-----------------------------------
2
SI1 812005
To: Palm Beach Gardens City Council
L: -21.. - - I ,II_ + :50 RCVD
Subject: Petition PUD-03-0 1 - Christ Fellowship Expansion
Unfortunately I can not attend the Public Hearing on the expansion plans for Christ
Fellowship. As I resident of Cypress Hollow Development I would to raise my strong
objections to any Mer expansion on the existing site. I have learned to live with the
noise fiom the campus (particularly loud with kids on Wednesday) and the flashing
police cars on Northlake (my friends always ask if there has been an accident). However
there is a limit to what that property and its neighbors can tolerate.
I would like your staff to go back to the first public hearing in
Dwyer High School on the initial expansion plans and review the statements made by the
church about future plans. There were quite a lot of untruths in that meeting with the
most significant concerning traf’fic. The Church stated that cars came equally fiom the
east and west (50150) yet independent studies stated otherwise (90% fiom the East and
10% from the West) which is reality. They stated they had no immediate expansion plans
even though their marketing booklet showed an enlarged campus. They stated there
would be limited use of the South Campus and certainly no shuttle vans which is not the
case.
The preliminary vote at that hearing was 4-1 against primarily due to size (Mega-Church
was the term used) in a residential area. That was later reversed to 3-2 in favor at a later
hearing.
My key point is “enough is enough”. ..we are still talking about a residential area with a
Mega-Church. They like to compare themselves to St. Ignatius, Trinity Methodist and/or
St. Marks. But they all seat much less than a thousand people and do not need policemen
after every sewice to exit the cars. I can live with what we got but no more expansion on
this site.
9260 Cypress Hollow Drive
Palm Beach Gardens, Fla. 3341 8
622-257 1
r
r
r
I;
NORM CAMPUS EXPANSION
CHRIST FELLOWSHIP
E
r 1 . F' u
n
i I
6 ll
6 65
I
OWSHIP
ImcHoABDBNsmRIDA
L
r
I
NOR'IH CAMPUS EXPANSON
CHRIST FELLOWSHIP
SMwOITHuQ~m PNUBEACH~FWRIDA
J
BQDD g
NORTH CAMPUS EXPANSION
CHRIST FELLOWSHIP
-
5343 NORTHLAW BOULBVARD rALM 8EACllOARDENS.FLORIDA
L
z !(e c
r \ /A
\ /" \ /
\ / \ i
2%
'\ !/?
\ /" \
\ /'
\ ,/'
\ /'
/
-.- I
J I I 1
I
I*"RInrrv."u"r,"-u.r .-.. ies 1 9 CHRIST FELLOWSHIP
L
1
;FI 0 0 n
W r P 2 83
f
2 B
2 Ei
I
L
1
r
bQbD 6 wr ; NORTH CAMPUS EXPANSION
CHRIST FELLOWSI-IIP
5143 NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD PALM BEACH OARDMS. rLORm
L
A
i
E
rn r
rC E
2
rn r rn <
0 T
5 I
NORTH CAMPUS EXPANSION
CHRIST FELLOWSHIP
J141 NGRTtLLAK6 BOULSVARD PALM BEACI1 GARDENS. FLORIDA
-
L
1
B
1 E J
f
,
I
isk
la Q
NORTH CAMPUS EXPANSION .L b CHRIST FELLOWSHIP
5343 NORTIU.AKB BOULBVARD PALM BEACH OARDENS. FLORIDA
L
CHRISTFELLOWSHIP - SOUTH CAMPUS
b /-+hi I
6
Landscape Specifications &
Planting Details
ZI ........ -2 NORTH CAMPUS FXPANSION $$<$.s;g-o CHRIST FELLOWSHIP saS3$33 3 $= - I 5243 NORTHIXF BOULEVARD PALM BFACII GARDmS, FlORIDA
I fj\ 1.. .......
___- ^ .... . I - .
~ e"' , *e'
i
p.., ........... *.. .... p
f i I/ J
F
NORMME ELM).
lo
D
t
1
I
ri I
i i I
W W le !m
I
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
ORDINANCE 18,2005
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA REZONING A PARCEL OF LAND
CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES, LOCATED ON THE
NORTH SIDE OF NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD APPROXIMATELY
ONE MILE WEST OF MILITARY TRAIL, AS MORE PARTICULARLY
TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) OVERLAY WITH AN
UNDERLYING ZONING DESIGNATION OF RESIDENTIAL LOW
FELLOWSHIP NORTH CAMPUS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
(PUD); AMENDING ORDINANCE 20, 1997 AND ORDINANCE 23,
1999 RELATING TO THE ZONING FOR THE CHRIST FELLOWSHIP
NORTH CAMPUS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) TO
TRANSFER THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND RELATED
CONDITIONS TO RESOLUTION 83,2005; AMENDING THE ZONING
DISTRICT MAP; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY-3 (RL3)
DENSITY-3 (RL3), TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CHRIST
WHEREAS, on November 20, 1997, the City Council adopted Ordinance 20,
1997, thereby approving the Christ Fellowship North Campus Planned Unit
Development (PUD) and the master development plan for said PUD; and
WHEREAS, on July 15, 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance 23, 1999
providing for an amendment to Ordinance 20, 1997 to allow for changes to the
elevations and floor plans for the aforesaid PUD; and
WHEREAS, the City has received a request from Mr. Doug Rhudy of Palm
Beach Gardens Christ Fellowship, Inc. for approval of: (1) an amendment to the Christ
Fellowship North Campus Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow the incorporation
into the PUD of the 20 acres of land lying immediately east of the existing North
Campus and to allow the development of an approximately 159,180-square-foot
expansion to the North Campus; (2) a Conditional Use for the expanded Christ
Fellowship Campus; and (3) modifications to certain conditions of approval for the North
Campus, generally located on the north side of Northlake Boulevard approximately one
(1) mile west of Military Trail, as more particularly described herein; and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application
and has determined that it is more appropriate that the site plan approval and the
conditions related thereto be transferred to Resolution 83, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the evidence and testimony
presented by the Petitioner and other interested parties and the recommendations of
the various City of Palm Beach Gardens review agencies and staff; and
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Ordinance 18,2005
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that adoption of this Ordinance is in
the best interest of the citizens and residents of the City of Palm Beach Gardens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA that:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and ratified.
SECTION 2. Section 1 of Ordinance 20, 1997 is amended to read: The zoninq
of the followina described propertv known as the Christ Fellowship North Campus is
herebv desianated as a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlav with an underlyinq ii
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
“WEST 20 ACRES”
THE EAST 653.87 FEET OF THE WEST 693.87 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 42
SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 88’30’27” EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 14, A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
NORTH 1’57’07” EAST ON A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 40 FEET EAST OF THE
WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, A DISTANCE
OF 1,332.88 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14 SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE
SOUTH LINE OF THE GARDENS HUNT CLUB AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 59,
PAGES 162 THROUGH 165, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH
88’25’09” EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 653.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
1’57’07” WEST ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 693.87 FEET EAST OF THE
WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, A DISTANCE
OF 1,331.87 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 14; THENCE NORTH 88’30’27” WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 653.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 20.00 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
-and-
“EAST 20 ACRES”
THE NORTH 691.11 FEET LESS THE WEST 693.87 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 42
SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH lo57’07’’ EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, A DISTANCE OF 1,332.94 FEET TO
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF
THE GARDENS HUNT CLUB AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 59, PAGES 162
THROUGH 165, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA: THENCE SOUTH 88’25’09’’
EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 693.88 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 88’25’09” EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 629.59 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE SOUTH I057’07’’
WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 691 .I 1 FEET TO A LINE 691 .I 1
FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14: THENCE NORTH 88O25’09” WEST
ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 631 .OO FEET TO A LINE 693.87 FEET EAST OF
THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE
NORTH 1’57’07’’ EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 691.12 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
TOGETHER WITH:
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14,
TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS
THE NORTH 691.11 FEET THEREOF AND LESS THE WEST 693.87 FEET
THEREOF, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 88’30’27” EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 14. A DISTANCE OF 693.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 88O30’27’’ EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 14. A DISTANCE OF 632.30 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE NORTH 1’50’07’’ EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 639.77
FEET TO A LINE 691.1 1 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE
3
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Ordinance 18, 2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Ordinance 18,2005
NORTH 88O25’09” WEST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 631.00 FEET TO A
LINE 693.87 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 14: THENCE SOUTH 1°57’07” WEST ALONG SAID LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 640.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 19.28 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
TOTAL LAND COMBINED CONTAINING 39.28 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SECTION 3. Sections 2 and 3, inclusive, of Ordinance 20, 1997, and Sections 2
and 3, inclusive, of Ordinance 23, 1999 are hereby transferred to Resolution 83, 2005.
Any future amendments to the development plans and/or conditions of approval shall be
accomplished by Resolution of the City Council.
SECTION 4. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to make
appropriate changes on the zoning district map of the City to effectuate the purpose of
this Ordinance.
SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
(The remainder of this page left intentionally blank)
4
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Ordinance 18, 2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46 47
PASSED this day of , 2005, upon first reading.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of , 2005, upon second
and final reading.
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
BY:
Joseph R. Russo, Mayor
Eric Jablin, Vice Mayor
David Levy, Councilmember
Hal R. Valeche, Councilmember
Jody Barnett, Councilmember
ATTEST:
BY:
Patricia Snider, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LE GAL S U F F I C I E N CY
BY:
Christine P. Tatum, City Attorney
FOR AGAINST ABSENT
G:\attorney-share\ORDINANCES\christ fellowship north campus - ord 18 2005.doc
5
d
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
RESOLUTION 83,2005
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO
THE CHRIST FELLOWSHIP NORTH CAMPUS PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT (PUD), LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE WEST
OF MILITARY TRAIL, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN, TO INCORPORATE AN ADDITIONAL 20 ACRES AND TO
EXPANSION TO THE NORTH CAMPUS; GRANTING
CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL FOR THE EXPANDED CHRIST
FELLOWSHIP CAMPUS; AMENDING CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF
APPROVAL FOR THE NORTH CAMPUS; PROVIDING FOR
WAIVERS; PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 159,180-SQUARE-FOOT
WHEREAS, on November 20, 1997, the City Council adopted Ordinance 20,
1997, thereby approving the Christ Fellowship North Campus Planned Unit
Development (PUD) and the master development plan for said PUD; and
WHEREAS, on July 15, 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance 23, 1999
amending Ordinance 20, 1997 to allow for changes to the elevations and floor plans for
the aforesaid PUD; and
WHEREAS, the City has received a request (Petitions PUD-01-03 & PUD 03-01)
from Mr. Doug Rhudy of Palm Beach Gardens Christ Fellowship, Inc. for approval of: (1)
an amendment to the Christ Fellowship North Campus Planned Unit Development
(PUD) to allow the incorporation of 20 acres of land lying immediately east of the
existing North Campus into the PUD to facilitate the development of a 159,180-square-
foot expansion to the North Campus; (2) a conditional use for the expanded Christ
Fellowship Campus; and (3) the deletion of certain conditions of approval for the North
Campus, generally located on the north side of Northlake Boulevard approximately one
(1) mile west of Military Trail, as more particularly described herein; and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application,
has determined that it is sufficient and is consistent with the City's Land Development
Regulations and Comprehensive Plan, and has recommended approval; and
WHEREAS, by adoption of Ordinance 18, 2005, the City Council determined that
the site plan approvals and related conditions for the Christ Fellowship North Campus
PUD contained in Ordinance 20, 1997 and Ordinance 23, 1999 shall be transferred to
this Resolution; and
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 83,2005
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the evidence and testimony
presented by the Petitioner and other interested parties and the recommendations of
the various City of Palm Beach Gardens review agencies and staff; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that adoption of this Resolution is in
the best interest of the citizens and residents of the City of Palm Beach Gardens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA that:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and ratified.
SECTION 2. The amended Master Development Plan for the Christ Fellowship
North Campus Planned Unit Development is hereby APPROVED on the following
described real property to permit the following development:
0 a 159,180-square-foot expansion of ancillary uses to an existing religious
institute on the existing North Campus; and
0 a conditional use approval for the entire 40-acre Christ Fellowship North
Campus PUD
on an approximately 40-acre site located along the north side of Northlake Boulevard
approximately one (1) mile west of Military Trail, subject to the conditions of approval
contained herein, which are in addition to the general requirements otherwise provided
by ordinance:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
“WEST 20 ACRES”
THE EAST 653.87 FEET OF THE WEST 693.87 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 42
SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 88O30’27” EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 14, A DISTANCE OF 40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
NORTH 1O57’07” EAST ON A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 40 FEET EAST OF THE
WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, A DISTANCE
OF 1,332.88 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14 SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE
SOUTH LINE OF THE GARDENS HUNT CLUB AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 59,
2
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 83,2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
PAGES 162 THROUGH 165, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH
88’25’09” EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 653.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
1’57’07” WEST ALONG A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 693.87 FEET EAST OF THE
WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, A DISTANCE
OF 1,331.87 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID
SECTION 14; THENCE NORTH 88’30’27” WEST ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 653.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 20.00 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
-and-
“EAST 20 ACRES”
THE NORTH 691.11 FEET LESS THE WEST 693.87 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 42
SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 1’57’07” EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, A DISTANCE OF 1,332.94 FEET TO
THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14, SAID LINE ALSO BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF
THE GARDENS HUNT CLUB AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 59, PAGES 162
THROUGH 165, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 88°25’09”
EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 693.88 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 88’25’09’’ EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 629.59 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE SOUTH 1’57’07’’
WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 691.11 FEET TO A LINE 691.11
FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE NORTH 88°25’09’’ WEST
ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 631 .OO FEET TO A LINE 693.87 FEET EAST OF
THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE
NORTH 1’57’07” EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 691.12 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
TOGETHER WITH:
THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 14,
TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS
THE NORTH 691.11 FEET THEREOF AND LESS THE WEST 693.87 FEET
THEREOF, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
3
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 83,2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH ‘88’30’27” EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 14, A DISTANCE OF 693.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 88’30’27’’ EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID
SECTION 14, A DISTANCE OF 632.30 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14;
THENCE NORTH 1’50’07” EAST ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 639.77
FEET TO A LINE 691 .I 1 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 14; THENCE
NORTH 88’25’09” WEST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 631.00 FEET TO A
LINE 693.87 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SAID SECTION 14; THENCE SOUTH 1’57’07” WEST ALONG SAID LINE, A
DISTANCE OF 640.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 19.28 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
TOTAL LAND COMBINED CONTAINING 39.28 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida hereby
approves the following five (5) waivers:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Section 78-315(b) of the City’s LDRs, entitled Landscape islands, to allow
for more than nine (9) parking spaces in a row without the inclusion of a
landscape island.
Section 78-414 of the City’s LDRs, entitled Number of spaces required
(bicycle parking), to allow for 48 bicycle parking spaces.
Section 78-141 of the City’s LDRs, entitled Residential zoning district
regulations, to allow for a building height of 38 feet, 10 inches.
Section 78-1 59(j)(49) of the City’s LDRs, entitled Additional standards, to
allow for 1,086 grassed parking spaces (59% of required parking).
Section 78-344 (1)(1) of the City’s LDRs, entitled Minimum dimensions (of
off-street parking), to allow for 777 parking spaces at 9.5 feet in width.
SECTION 4. Said Planned Unit Development is approved subject to the
following amended conditions, which shall be the responsibility of the applicant, its
successors, or assigns:
Traffic
1. The four (4) traffic lanes located at the western portion of the site which
provide access to/from Northlake Boulevard shall be utilized as follows:
4
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 83,2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
a) Following all services and events, traffic cones or other similar traffic
devices shall be utilized so as to limit ingress to the site to one (1) lane;
egress shall be provided via two (2) left-turn lanes and one (1) right-turn
lane. NO LONGER APPLICABLE.
b) During all other times, two (2) lanes shall be used as inbound lanes and
two (2) lanes shall be used as outbound lanes. NO LONGER
APPL I CAB LE.
2. The owner or successor shall utilize police or equally-trained officials at all
ingress and egress points along Northlake Boulevard for the management
of traffic flow and direction before and after all events, including regularly
scheduled events. The petitioner shall maintain a minimum of four (41 #wee &I police or equally-trained officials at all times for the direction and control
of traffic entering and exiting the site in accordance with the
recommendations made bv the Citv’s traffic consultant, MTP Group, Inc., in
the memorandum dated March 15, 2005, prepared bv MTP Group, Inc.. on
file with the Citv’s Growth Management Department. The petitioner shall
adiust and provide the appropriate number of police officers required for
traffic circulation manaqement as based on the vawinq field conditions and
police officer recommendations. As a guideline, traffic on Northlake
Boulevard shall not be stopped for more than ninety (90) seconds during the
traffic control period. Prioritv shall be given to Hunt Club Drive with regard
to traffic management and access onto Northlake Boulevard in an effort to
minimize the impact on surroundinq residents. (Planning & Zoning)
3. The applicant shall comply with the following conditions and
recommendations outlined in the memoranda prepared bv the Citv’s traffic
consultant, MTP Group, Inc., dated Julv 29, 2004, and March 15, 2005, on
file with the Citv’s Growth Management Department:
a) Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the new
buildings, the applicant shall convert the existing exclusive westbound
right-turn lane to a shared throughhight-turn lane at the intersection of
Northlake Boulevard and Military Trail.
b) The Sundav service shall be moved from 11 :45 a.m. to 12:OO noon. The
required time between services may be modified bv the Growth
Management Administrator, as necessary, to improve traffic operations.
c) Traffic circulation on site shall be in accordance with the Traffic
Operation Plan on file with the Citv’s Growth Management Department.
Said traffic plan may be amended bv the Citv’s Police Chief and/or Citv
Enqineer as appropriate for traffic operations.
5
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 83,2005
1
2
3
4
5 4. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land
6 alteration permit, the applicant shall prepare plans and submit an application
7 to Palm Beach Countv Traffic Division for review and approval of a
8 manuallv-operable traffic signal at the east entrance to the site. (City
9 Enqineer. Planning & Zoninq)
10
11
12
13
14 & Zoninq)
15
16 6.
17
18
19
20
d) The applicant shall, with trained personnel, monitor traffic conditions at
the driveways, as well as internal traffic circulation, to minimize traffic
impact to Northlake Boulevard. (Citv Engineer)
5. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall
install a manuallv-operable traffic siqnal at the east project entrance, as
approved bv Palm Beach Countv Traffic Division. (Citv Enqineer, Planning
Prior to construction plan approval, the applicant shall provide suretv for
signalization of the east entrance. Per LDR Section 78-309, the required
suretv shall be based on a cost estimate for the project improvement. The
cost estimate shall be signed and sealed bv an engineer registered in the
State of Florida. Suretv will be based on 110Y0 of the total approved cost
21
22
estimates and shall be posted with the Citv prior to the issuance of the first
building permit. (Citv Engineer)
23
24 Enqineering
25
26 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, a boundary plat shall have
27 been prepared, approved by City Council, and recorded in the public
28 records of Palm Beach County. REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION.
29
30 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, all necessary permits shall
31 have been obtained from South Florida Water Management District
32 (SFWMD), Health and Rehabilitative Services, and Palm Beach County.
33 (City Engineer)
34
35
36
37
38
39
40 approvals. (Citv Engineer)
41
42 11. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first buildinq
43 permit, the applicant shall provide suretv for public infrastructure and all
44 landscaping and irriqation costs. Per LDR Section 78-309, the required
45 suretv shall be based on a cost estimate for the proiect, includinq public
46 infrastructure and all landscaping and irrigation costs, for review and
7.
8.
9. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the property owner or
successor must obtain a driveway connection permit from Palm Beach
County for the Northlake Boulevard entrance. (City Engineer)
IO. The applicant shall copv to the Citv all permit applications, certifications. and
6
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 83, 2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Police
approval bv the Citv in order to establish suretv. The cost estimate shall be
siqned and sealed bv an engineer and landscape architect reqistered in the
State of Florida. Surety will be based on 110% of the total combined
approved cost estimates and shall be posted with the Citv prior to the
issuance of the first building permit. (Citv Engineer)
12. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first buildinq
permit, the applicant shall provide a cost estimate for the on-site proiect
improvements, not including public infrastructure, landscapinq, and irrigation
costs, for review and approval bv the Citv. The cost estimate shall be
siqned and sealed bv an enqineer registered in the State of Florida and
shall be posted with the Citv prior to the issuance of the first building permit.
/Bu ild ing Department)
13. Prior to construction plan approval and the issuance of the first land
alteration or buildinq permit, the applicant shall schedule a pre-permit
meetinq with Citv staff. (Citv Enqineer)
14. Bv (sixty (60) davs from the effective date of this Resolution),
the applicant shall submit a revised photometric plan, siqned and sealed bv
an enqineer registered in the State of Florida, for review and approval bv the
Citv Engineer. Said plan shall be approved bv wav of an administrative
approval so lonq as the plan is consistent with the requirements of the LDRs
and shall be approved prior to the issuance of the first building permit. (Citv
Engineer)
15. Prior to construction plan approval, the applicant shall provide adequate
response to drainage concerns, includina. but not limited to, showinq on the
engineering plans and constructing two 8” x 8” weep holes within the 6’ wall
for each adjacent Hunt Club lot (28 total weep holes), per SFWMD
specifications, as outlined at the March 11, 2004, meeting with SFWMD and
the City Engineer. (Citv Enqineer)
16. Lighting shall not conflict with landscaping, including lonq-term tree qrowth.
[Police Department)
17. All liqhtinq for streets, parking lots, and pedestrian walkwavs shall be metal
halide. Metal halide lightinq shall. be used for the multi-use pathways and
sidewalks within the site and shall be lit at a minimum of 0.6-foot candles.
(Police Department)
18. Non-qlare buildinq liqhtinq shall be installed around the entire building
perimeter and on pedestrian walkwavs. (Police Department)
7
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 83,2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
19. Entw signage shall be lighted. (Police Department)
20. Timer clock or photocell lighting shall be provided for nighttime use above or
near entwavs and all exits, includinq emergency exits. (Police
Department)
21. Numerical addresses shall: (1) be unobstructed: (2) be illuminated for
nighttime visibilitv: and (3) have bi-directional visibilitv from the roadway.
(Police Department)
22. All structures shall use the followins target hardening techniques:
a) Buildings shall be pre-wired for an alarm svstem.
b) Doors shall be equipped with metal plates over the threshold of the
lockinq mechanism.
c) Glass perimeter doors shall be equipped with case hardened quard
rings to protect the mortise lock cylinder.
d) Rear doors shall have 180-degree peephole viewers.
e) All perimeter doors shall be equipped with hinqes that utilize non-
removable hinqe pins. (Police Department)
Landscapinq
.. . 23.
4%mpwsy The owner or successor shall be responsible for
the perpetual maintenance of saki landscaping within the Hunt Club Drive
right-of-way from Northlake Boulevard to the northern terminus of the
church property. (City Forester)
24. If at any time the City determines that maintenance of the grass parking
area is in disrepair or poor appearance, the City may require the owner or
successor to ~cct tkc 4-u" cf fe&pt-d .. ..
pave the parkinq area within one-hundred-einhtv (180)
days of receipt of written notice bv the Citv. All such paving shall be
conducted according to City standards at the time of paving. All costs shall
be the responsibility of the owner or successor. At the time of pavinq. a
landscape island shall be installed for even/ nine (9) parkinq spaces located
in a row within the areas being paved. (City Forester)
8
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 83, 2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
25. Bv (six (6) months from the effective date of this Resolution),
the property owner shall reimburse the Citv for the Citv’s cost to install all
landscapinq and irriqation within the Northlake Boulevard medians
extendinq from the eastern terminus of the propertv to Hunt Club Drive.
[Citv Forester)
26. The applicant, successors, or assigns shall be responsible for payment to
the City of their annual fair share of the maintenance of the Northlake
Boulevard medians extendinq from the eastern terminus of the propertv to
Hunt Club Drive. (Citv Forester)
27. Bv (three (3) months from the effective date of this
Resolution), the propertv owner shall replace all landscapinq removed due
to its death, disease, damage, insect infestation, or hurricane damage, as
shown on the approved landscape plan for the west parcel. (Citv Forester)
28. BV (six (6) months from the effective date of this Resolution),
the propertv owner shall remove all prohibited and invasive non-native
plants from the propertv. (Citv Forester)
29. Prior to the issuance of the first buildinq permit, the applicant shall update
the landscape plan to a scale of 1” = 20’. (Citv Forester)
30. Prior to the issuance of the first buildinq permit, the applicant shall erect and
maintain protective barriers around the drip line of trees adiacent to
proposed improvements. All work shall be inspected and approved bv the
Landscape Architect of Record and the Citv Forester. (Citv Forester)
31. All trees or plants proposed for relocation that die as a result of relocation
shall be replaced using the following schedule: for every inch of tree caliper
lost, three (3) inches of new tree caliper shall be replaced with a like specie.
Palms shall be replaced with like specie, one (1) for one (I), with a minimum
ten (IO) foot heiqht. Shrubs shall be replaced with like specie, one (1) for
one (I), with a minimum 30-inch heiqht. If the site cannot support the total
number of replacement trees as required above, the Citv Council mav
permit the developer to donate excess trees to the Citv for plantinq on public
lands. (Citv Forester)
Planninq and Zoninq
32. The number of fixed and/or moveable seats within the sanctuary shall at no
time exceed 1,750. (Code Enforcement)
9
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 83,2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
33. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the petitioner shall submit a
revised lighting photometric plan, indicating maximum 20-foot-high light
poles, for the City's approval. REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION.
34. Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy, the petitioner shall
erect a six (6) foot wall along the entire && northem property line of the
- site. (Planning & Zoning)
.. .. 35. *cm
4 No parking of vehicles
shall occur in the retention area north of the northernmost parking lot and
knrm. (City Forester)
c3Q U" ..
36. All conditions from Ordinance 20, 1997 shall remain in full force and effect.
(Planning & Zoning) NO LONGER APPLICABLE
37. The northern open space shall be used for recreational open space. No
drive-aisles shall be extended to the northern green area ew%si#c t.3 #m
ea& without approval by City Council. (Planning & Zoning)
38. The church sanctuary and related facilities and surrounding grounds shall
be used by members only for regularly scheduled services, including
services on Christmas Day and Easter Sunday, and for no more than si++j
three (3) additional events per calendar year. The church sanctuary and
related facilities shall not be leased, rented, or in any way made available
for use as an auditorium, theater, or similar gathering place for non-member
events of any kind. Regularly scheduled services shall be defined as
services occurring on Saturday evening, Sunday morning, and a mid-week
evening. (Planninq & Zoninq, Code Enforcement)
39. All applicable municipal and county impact fees shall be payable
contemporaneous with issuance of the-#kd any building permit for vertical
construction. (Planninq & Zoning, Building Official)
40. The owner or successor shall not utilize a loudspeaker, sound amplifier,
radio, phonograph, or similar sound amplifying device to emit any form of
sound outside the church sanctuary and related facilities. (Planninq &
Zonina Code Enforcement)
41. No buildings on site -v A ad43 shall net be used as overflow areas
or for supplemental seating for presentations, programs, or sermons
conducted in the sanctuary. (Planning & Zoninq, Code Enforcement)
10
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 83,2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
42. Simultaneous broadcasts of presentations, programs, or sermons
conducted in the sanctuary to any other remete location on the North and
South Campus- CY dktte- ’ , shall be prohibited. (Planninq & Zoning,
Cod e Enforcement)
43. Building A shall be limited to a capacity of 452 people. (Planninq & Zoning,
Code Enforcement)
44. The applicant shall place the utilities alonq Northlake Boulevard
underqround from the eastern terminus of the North Campus to Hunt Club
Drive. (Planninq & Zoning)
45. All audible noise on site shall not exceed applicable noise and decibel
requirements set forth in the City’s Code of Ordinances. (Planninq &
Zon i nq )
46. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from view. (Planninq &
Zoninq)
47. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, the property shall
be replatted to include the entire site. (Planning & Zoning)
48. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the applicant shall comply
with Section 78-262 of the Citv Code relative to Art in Public Places. The
applicant shall provide art on site or make a payment in lieu thereof. The
Art in Public Places Advisow Board shall review and make a
recommendation to the Citv Council on any proposed art on site. If the
applicant is providing public art on site, the art shall be installed prior to the
issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. (Planning & Zoninq)
49. Required digital files of the approved replat shall be submitted to the
Planninq and Zoninq Division prior to the issuance of the first certificate of
occupancy, and approved civil design and architectural drawings shall be
submitted prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy. (GIs
Manaqer, Development Compliance Officer)
50. There shall be no vehicular access from the North Campus to the vacant
property owned by the church located to the northeast of the North Campus
until such time when said property is annexed into the City. (Planning &
Zoning)
51. Prior to the issuance of the first buildinq permit, the applicant shall explore
opportunities to utilize sound absorbing/dampening building materials in the
new buildinqs and provide, in writina details of the materials/methods to be
utilized to reduce the impact relative to sound on adiacent properties.
[Planning & Zoning)
11
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 83,2005
52. Anv outdoor recreational facilities constructed on the North Campus shall be
processed as a Maior Amendment to the PUD pursuant to the Citv’s Land
Development Requlations. (Planning & Zoninq)
53. The build-out date for this proiect is December 31, 2006. (Planning &
Zo n i ng )
SECTION 5. Said Planned Unit Development shall be constructed in compliance
with the following plans, as amended herein, on file with the City’s Growth Management
Department:
1. October 28, 1997, Conceptual Floor Plan and Section, Glenn Pate &
Associates, 2 sheets.
2. November 14, 1997, Landscape Plan, George G. Gentile & Associates,
Sheet L-I.
3. January 24, 1997, Landscape Elevations, George G. Gentile & Associates,
Sheet L-2.
4. February 21, 1997, Landscape Elevations, George G. Gentile & Associates,
Sheets L-3 through L-5.
5. November 3, 1997, Irrigation Plan, George G. Gentile & Associates, Sheet I-
1.
6. September 30, 1997, Conceptual Drainage Plan, Kimley-Horn and
Associates, Sheet C-I .O.
7. March 19, 1999, Architectural Site Plan, Glenn Pate & Associates, Sheet SP-
1.
8. May 18, 1999, Building B Elevations (Children’s Education), Glenn Pate &
Associates, Sheet A-I .
9. June 25, 1999, Building B Floor Plan, Glenn Pate & Associates.
IO. May 18, 1999, Building A Floor Plan (Youth Ministry), Glenn Pate &
Associates, Sheet A-2.
1 1. May 18, 1999, Building A Elevations, Glenn Pate & Associates, Sheet A-3.
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 83,2005
12. May 18, 1999, Building C Elevations, Glenn Pate & Associates, Sheets A-4,
A-5.
13. May 11 , 1999, Letter from Glenn Pate & Associates.
14. Site Plan: Sheets ASP-I throuqh ASP-3, prepared bv Pate, Chernin and
Associates, last revised on Mav 24, 2005, and received and stamped bv the
Citv on June 1,2005.
15. Landscape Plan: Sheets L-1 & L-2. prepared bv Gentile, Hollowav,
O’Mahonev & Associates, Inc., last revised on Mav 31, 2005, and received
and stamped bv the Citv on June 1,2005.
16. Conceptual Floor Plans: Sheets A-1 & A-2, prepared bv Pate, Chernin and ,
Associates, last revised on Februarv 23, 2004, and received and stamped
bv the Citv on Mav 18,2005.
17. Roof Plan: Sheet A-3, prepared bv Pate, Chernin and Associates, last
revised on November 22, 2004, and received and stamped bv the Citv on
Mav 18,2005.
18. Buildinq Elevations: Sheets A-4 throuqh A-6, prepared bv Pate, Chernin and
Associates, last revised on November 22, 2004, and received and stamped
bv the Citv on Mav 18,2005.
SECTION 6. All future amendments to the Christ Fellowship North Campus PUD
shall be approved by resolution.
SECTION 7. Said approval shall be consistent with all representations made by
the applicant or applicant’s agents at any workshop or public hearing.
SECTION 8. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
(The remainder of this page left intentionally blank)
13
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 83,2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46 47
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,2005.
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA
BY:
Joseph R. Russo, Mayor
ATTEST:
BY:
Patricia Snider, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
BY:
Christine P. Tatum, City Attorney
VOTE: AYE NAY ABSENT
MAYOR RUSSO ---
VICE MAYOR JABLIN ---
COUNCILMEMBERLEVY ---
COUNCILMEMBERVALECHE ---
COUNCILMEMBER BARNETT ---
\\Pbgsfile\Attorney\attorney_share\RESOLUTlONS\christ fellowship - north campus - reso 83 2005.doc
14
d
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
ORDINANCE 19,2005
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE 30, 1990,
ORDINANCE 34, 1999, AND ORDINANCE 51, 1999 RELATING TO
THE ZONING FOR THE CHRIST FELLOWSHIP SOUTH CAMPUS
TO TRANSFER THE CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL AND
RELATED CONDITIONS TO RESOLUTION 84, 2005; AND
PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, on December 20, 1990, the City Council adopted Ordinance 30,
1990, thereby approving a rezoning and Conditional Use for the Christ Fellowship South
Campus (the “South Campus”) to allow for a church, a preschool, and accessory uses
thereto; and
WHEREAS, on January 30, 1991, the City Council adopted Resolution 13, 1991
providing site plan approval for the South Campus; and
WHEREAS, on August 27, 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance 34, 1999
approving an amendment to Ordinance 30, 1990 to allow for an increase in capacity on
the South Campus; and
WHEREAS, on January 20, 2000, the City Council adopted Ordinance 51, 1999
approving an amendment to Ordinance 34, 1999 allowing for an extension to a date
certain condition of approval relating to the calculation of the parking requirements on
the South Campus; and
WHEREAS, the City has received a request (Petitions CU-01-06 & SP-01-44)
from Mr. Doug Rhudy of Palm Beach Gardens Christ Fellowship, Inc. for amendments
to the site plan and Conditional Use approval for the Christ Fellowship South Campus to
allow for the deletion of certain conditions of approval; and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application
and has determined that it is more appropriate that the Conditional Use approval and
related conditions related thereto be transferred to Resolution 84, 2005; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the evidence and testimony
presented by the Petitioner and other interested parties and the recommendations of
the various City of Palm Beach Gardens review agencies and staff; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that adoption of this Ordinance is in
the best interest of the citizens and residents of the City of Palm Beach Gardens.
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Ordinance 19.2005
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA that:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and ratified.
SECTION 2. Section 1 of Ordinance 30, 1990 is amended to read: The zoninq
of the followinq described propertv known as the Christ Fellowship South Campus is
hereby designated as Residential Low Density-I (RLI): T!x .. .
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
SOUTH CAMPUS
PARCEL 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
FROM THE NORTHEAST SECTION CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 42
SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST; THENCE SOUTH OOO3’46” WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE
OF SAID SECTION 23, A DISTANCE OF 107.45 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE
SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LAKE PARK WEST ROAD AS NOW LAID OUT
AND IN USE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A
DISTANCE OF 1,606.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE
OF 306.48 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 550.00 FEET TO A
POINT; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 156.48 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST; THENCE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG
THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 500 FEET AND A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 15O49’36”, A DISTANCE OF 151.93 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH
A DISTANCE OF 534.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTINUE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE
LESS THE SOUTH 50 FEET THEREOF FOR CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY AS
CONVEYED BY RIGHT-OF-WAY DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
1861, PAGE 241, AND LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF AS CONVEYED BY
RIGHT-OF-WAY DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 4171, PAGE 1253.
2
~
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Ordinance 19, 2005
PARCEL 2
LOT IN “NOT INCLUDED’’ PART OF UNRECORDED PLAT OF HORSESHOE ACRES
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION
23 IN TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA;
THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF SECTION 23
OF AN ASSUMED BEARING SOUTH 0°01’53” WEST A DISTANCE OF 107.45 FEET
TO A POINT IN THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LAKE PARK WEST ROAD;
THENCE AT BEARING DUE EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE
OF 587.96 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE AT BEARING DUE
EAST A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE AT BEARING DUE SOUTH
A DISTANCE OF 500 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
CANAL NO. 1; THENCE AT BEARING DUE WEST ALONG THE SAID RIGHT-OF-
WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE AT BEARING DUE
NORTH A DISTANCE OF 500 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF AS CONVEYED TO RIGHT-OF-WAY DEED
RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 41 71, PAGE 1253.
TOGETHER WITH:
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
FROM THE NORTHEAST SECTION CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 42
SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST; THENCE SOUTH 0’09’46’’ WEST, ALONG THE EAST
LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, A DISTANCE OF 107.45 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON
THE SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY OF LAKE PARK WEST ROAD AS NOW LAID OUT
AND IN USE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A
DISTANCE OF 1,607.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE
OF 306.48 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 550.00 FEET TO A
POINT; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 156.48 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST; THENCE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG
THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 550 FEET AND A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 15’49’36” A DISTANCE OF 151.93 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH
A DISTANCE OF 529.15 FEET TO A POINT OF BEGINNING, LESS THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: FROM THE NORTHEAST SECTION CORNER
OF SAID SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, THENCE SOUTH
0’09’46” WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, A DISTANCE OF
CONTINUE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE
107.45 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
3
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Ordinance 19, 2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
LAKE PARK WEST ROAD, AS NOW LAID OUT AND IN USE; THENCE WEST
THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE
HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE CONTINUE WEST ALONG SAID
THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 500.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE EAST A
DISTANCE OF 156.48 FEET TO A POINT- OF CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTHWEST; THENCE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID
CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
17”27’27”, A DISTANCE OF 152.35 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTHERN A
DISTANCE OF 476.97 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
ALONG SAID SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1607.00 FEET TO
SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 306.48 FEET TO A POINT;
TOGETHER WITH:
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID
SECTION 23; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF
SECTION 23 ON AN ASSUMED BEARING OF SOUTH 0’01’53” WEST A DISTANCE
OF 107.45 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LAKE PARK
WEST ROAD; THENCE BEARING EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A
DISTANCE OF 737.96 FEET TO A POINT 1913.48 FEET WESTERLY OF THE EAST
THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 500.00 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE
1855, PAGE 1378, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA AND
THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL;
THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 50.00 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF CANAL NO. 1;
THENCE WEST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET TO A
LINE OF SAID SECTION 23 (AS MEASURED ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE);
RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR CANAL NO. 1 AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
POINT; THENCE NORTH 50.00 FEET TO SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF CANAL
NO. 1; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 5.413 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
SECTION 3. Sections 4 and 5, inclusive, of Ordinance 34, 1999 and Sections 1
and 2, inclusive, of Ordinance 51 , 1999 are hereby transferred to Resolution 84, 2005.
Any future amendments to the Conditional Use, site plan, and/or conditions of approval
shall be accomplished by Resolution of the City Council.
SECTION 4. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
4
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Ordinance 19, 2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46 47
PASSED this day of , 2005, upon first reading.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,2005, upon second
and final reading.
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
BY:
Joseph R. Russo, Mayor
Eric Jablin, Vice Mayor
David Levy, Councilmember
Hal R. Valeche, Councilmember
Jody Barnett, Councilmember
ATTEST:
BY:
Patricia Snider, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SU FFl ClE NCY
BY:
Christine P. Tatum, City Attorney
FOR
G:\attorney-share\ORDINANCES\christ fellowship south campus - ord 19 2005.doc
AGAINST ABSENT
d
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
RESOLUTION 84,2005
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM
BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO
THE CHRIST FELLOWSHIP SOUTH CAMPUS CONDITIONAL USE
AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF
NORTHLAKE BOULEVARD APPROXIMATELY ONE MILE WEST
OF MILITARY TRAIL, AS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREIN, TO ALLOW FOR THE DELETION OF A CONDITION OF
APPROVAL; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, on December 20, 1990, the City Council adopted Ordinance 30,
1990, thereby approving a rezoning and conditional use for the Christ Fellowship South
Campus (the “South Campus”) to allow for a church, a preschool, and accessory uses
thereto; and
WHEREAS, on January 30, 1991, the City Council adopted Resolution 13, 1991
providing site plan approval for the South Campus; and
WHEREAS, on August 27, 1999, and January 20, 2000, the City Council
adopted Ordinance 34, 1999 and Ordinance 51, 1999, respectively, approving
amendments to the conditional use approval (Ordinance 30, 1990) for the South
Campus; and
WHEREAS, on November 4, 1999, and January 20, 2000, the City Council
adopted Resolution 86, 1999 and Resolution 5, 2000, respectively, approving
amendments to the site plan approval (Resolution 13, 1991) for the South Campus; and
WHEREAS, the City has received a request (Petitions CU-01-06 & SP-01-44)
from Mr. Doug Rhudy of Palm Beach Gardens Christ Fellowship, Inc. for amendments
to the site plan and conditional use approval for the Christ Fellowship South Campus to
allow for the deletion of certain conditions of approval; and
WHEREAS, the Growth Management Department has reviewed said application,
has determined that it is sufficient and is consistent with the City’s Land Development
Regulations, and has recommended approval; and
WHEREAS, by adoption of Ordinance 19, 2005, the City Council has determined
that the conditional use approval and related conditions for the South Campus
contained in Ordinance 34, 1999 and Ordinance 51, I999 shall be transferred to this
Resolution; and
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 84, 2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the evidence and testimony
presented by the petitioner and other interested parties and the recommendations of the
various City of Palm Beach Gardens review agencies and staff; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that adoption of this Resolution is in
the best interest of the citizens and residents of the City of Palm Beach Gardens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA that:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby affirmed and ratified.
SECTION 2. The amendment to the Christ Fellowship South Campus conditional
use is hereby APPROVED on the following described real property to permit the following
development, subject to the conditions of approval provided herein:
0 576-seat sanctuary (Ordinance 34, 1999)
use of the residence as a youth center (Ordinance 34, 1999)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
SOUTH CAMPUS
PARCEL 1
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
FROM THE NORTHEAST SECTION CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 42
SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST: THENCE SOUTH 0’03’46” WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE
OF SAID SECTION 23, A DISTANCE OF 107.45 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE
SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LAKE PARK WEST ROAD AS NOW LAID OUT
AND IN USE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A
DISTANCE OF 1,606.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE
OF 306.48 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 550.00 FEET TO A
POINT; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 156.48 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST; THENCE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG
THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 500 FEET AND A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 15’49’36”, A DISTANCE OF 151.93 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH
A DISTANCE OF 534.65 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTINUE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 84,2005
LESS THE SOUTH 50 FEET THEREOF FOR CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY AS
CONVEYED BY RIGHT-OF-WAY DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
1861, PAGE 241, AND LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF AS CONVEYED BY
PARCEL 2.
RIGHT-OF-WAY DEED RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 4171, PAGE 1253.
LOT IN “NOT INCLUDED” PART OF UNRECORDED PLAT OF HORSESHOE ACRES,
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF SECTION
23 IN TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA;
THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF SECTION 23
OF AN ASSUMED BEARING SOUTH 0°01’53” WEST A DISTANCE OF 107.45 FEET
TO A POINT IN THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LAKE PARK WEST ROAD;
THENCE AT BEARING DUE EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE
OF 587.96 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED
HEREIN AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE AT BEARING DUE
EAST A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE AT BEARING DUE SOUTH
A DISTANCE OF 500 FEET TO A POINT IN THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
CANAL NO. 1; THENCE AT BEARING DUE WEST ALONG THE SAID RIGHT-OF-
WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE AT BEARING DUE
NORTH A DISTANCE OF 500 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
LESS THE NORTH 30 FEET THEREOF AS CONVEYED TO RIGHT-OF-WAY DEED
RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 41 71 , PAGE 1253.
TOGETHER WITH:
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
FROM THE NORTHEAST SECTION CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 42
SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST; THENCE SOUTH 0’09’46” WEST, ALONG THE EAST
LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, A DISTANCE OF 107.45 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON
THE SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY OF LAKE PARK WEST ROAD AS NOW LAID OUT
AND IN USE; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A
DISTANCE OF 1,607.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE
OF 306.48 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 550.00 FEET TO A
POINT; THENCE EAST A DISTANCE OF 156.48 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE NORTHWEST; THENCE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG
THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 550 FEET AND A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 15’49’36” A DISTANCE OF 151.93 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH
A DISTANCE OF 529.15 FEET TO A POINT OF BEGINNING, LESS THE
CONTINUE WEST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE
3
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 84,2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: FROM THE NORTHEAST SECTION CORNER
OF SAID SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, THENCE SOUTH
0'09'46" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, A DISTANCE OF
LAKE PARK WEST ROAD, AS NOW LAID OUT AND IN USE; THENCE WEST
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE
HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL; THENCE CONTINUE WEST ALONG SAID
THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 500.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE EAST A
DISTANCE OF 156.48 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
NORTHWEST; THENCE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID
CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 500.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
17"27'27", A DISTANCE OF 152.35 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTHERN A
DISTANCE OF 476.97 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
107.45 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF
ALONG SAID SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1,607.00 FEET
SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 306.48 FEET TO A POINT;
TOGETHER WITH:
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING AND BEING IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 42 SOUTH, RANGE 42 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY,
FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID
SECTION 23; THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST HALF OF
SECTION 23 ON AN ASSUMED BEARING OF SOUTH O"01'53" WEST A DISTANCE
OF 107.45 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LAKE PARK
WEST ROAD; THENCE BEARING EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A
LINE OF SAID SECTION 23 (AS MEASURED ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE);
RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR CANAL NO. 1 AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK
DISTANCE OF 737.96 FEET TO A POINT 1,913.48 FEET WESTERLY OF THE EAST
THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 500.00 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE
1855, PAGE 1378, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA AND
THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED PARCEL;
THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 50.00 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF CANAL NO. 1;
THENCE WEST, ALONG SAID CENTERLINE, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET TO A
POINT; THENCE NORTH 50.00 FEET TO SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF CANAL
NO. 1; THENCE EAST ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET
TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 5.413 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 84,2005
SECTION 4. Said property is subject to the following amended conditions, which
shall be the responsibility of the applicant, its successors, or assigns:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
The church and caretaker‘s residence shall tie into potable water service
prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, and within one
hundred eighty (180) days after sewer lines become available to the subject
property, the church and caretaker’s residence shall tie into them. (City
Engineer) SATISFIED
The petitioner shall obtain a grading and drainage permit from Northern
Palm Beach County Water Control District. A Grading Plan will be required
if the slope or top of bank is regraded or if the exotics are removed. (City
Engineer) SATISFIED
If the City finds that the maintenance of the grass parking area is in
disrepair or poor appearance, the City may require the owner or successor
to pave the parkinq area within one hundred eiqhty (180) days of receipt of
written notice by the City. All such paving shall be conducted accordinq to
City standards at the time of pavinq. All costs shall be the responsibility of
the owner or successor. At the time of pavinq, a landscape island shall be
installed for every nine (9) parking spaces located in a row within the areas
being paved. 1 cf saki ..
Forester)
Subsequent phases and expansions shall comply with all applicable
regulations, including the removal of all exotics on site. (City Forester)
Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, site lighting shall
be reviewed and approved by the Police Department. (Police Department)
SAT1 S F I ED
A dumpster (3’ tall, 3’ deep, 6-7’ wide) shall be placed at the end of the
westernmost drive-aisle, at the edge of the pavement, and shall have a
concrete slab of no less than IO’ wide and 8’ deep. (Planning & Zoning)
SAT1 S F I ED
A 6’ fence or wall (to match the church exterior) shall be erected on three
sides of the dumpster with two 5’ (minimum) gates. (Planning & Zoning)
SAT1 S F I ED
The exterior of the church shall be painted Pearl Grey (MAB 309 16P), and
the exterior trim, columns, entrance features, and tower shall be painted
white (MAB 409 160). (Planning & Zoning) SATISFIED
5
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 84, 2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
9. Lighting along the westerly property line shall be permitted at a maximum of
20’, shielded from the adjacent properties. The City reserves the right to
require the petitioner to remove lighting along the westerly property line
within thirty (30) days upon written notification. (Planning & Zoning)
IO. Immediately upon the issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the new
sanctuary for Christ Fellowship on the north side of Northlake Boulevard (as
referenced in Ordinance 20, 1997, as amended) or by April 1, 2000,
whichever occurs first, the minimum parking requirement on this site shall
be calculated at a rate of one (1) space per three (3) seats in the sanctuary.
At that time, one hundred ninety-two (192) of the seats in the sanctuary
shall be permanently removed, leaving a permanent occupancy of no more
than 576 seats, and an affidavit shall be submitted to the City by the
petitioner affirming that the seating has been reduced to 576 or less.
(Development Compliance Officer) SAT1 S F I ED
11. Simultaneous broadcasts of presentations, programs, or sermons
conducted at any remote location to this site shall be prohibited. (Code
Enforcement)
12. When determined to be necessary by the City of Palm Beach Gardens
Police Department, the petitioner or successor shall utilize police or equally-
trained officials in numbers determined by the Police Department at all
ingress and egress points along Northlake Boulevard for the management
of traffic flow and direction before and after events. (Code Enforcement,
Police Department)
13. Within thirty (30) days of the adoption of this Resolution, the petitioner shall:
a) Remove the fifteen (15) parking spaces on the basketball court.
(Development Compliance Officer) SATISFIED
b) Install the new landscaping which is shown on the Phase 2 Plan
(Proposed Landscape) except for areas of the site which are subject to
new construction for drainage facilities. Landscaping in drainage
construction areas shall be installed within thirty (30) days of the
completion of that construction. (Development Compliance Officer)
SAT1 S FI ED
14. Within thirty (30) days of the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for the
sanctuary on Christ Fellowship’s new campus on the north side of Northlake
Boulevard (as referenced in Ordinance 20, 1997, as amended) or on May 1,
2000, whichever shall first occur, the petitioner shall:
a) Close the access point between this site and the Church of the Nazarene
to the west. REPLACED BY NEW CONDITION
6
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 84,2005
b) Complete all non-landscape site improvements and changes.
SAT1 S F I ED
c) Remove the modular units from the property. SATISFIED
d) Pave all parking aisles per City code. (Development Compliance Officer)
SAT1 S F I ED
15. Within ninety (90) days of the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for
the sanctuary on Christ Fellowship’s new campus on the north side of
Northlake Boulevard (as referenced in Ordinance 20, 1997 as amended),
the petitioner shall tie this project into the public sewer system.
(Develop men t Com pl iance Off ice r) SAT1 S F I ED
16. Prior to the issuance of a land alteration permit for the Christ Fellowship
North Campus, the applicant shall eliminate the existing vehicle cross
access along the western buffer to the Church of the Nazarene bv restorinq
the landscape buffer for the South Campus consistent with the approved
landscape plans. (Citv Forester)
SECTION 5. Said property shall be constructed in compliance with the following
plans on file with the City’s Growth Management Department:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Development Application stamped November IO, 1999.
June 7, 1999, Existing South Campus Site Pian, Glenn Pate & Associates,
Sheet SP 1 .O.
August 5, 1999, Future Phase 2 Site Plan (date stamped October 28, 1999),
Glenn Pate & Associates, Sheet SP I .O.
June 16, 1999, Existing (as-built) Landscape Plan, Glenn Pate &
Associates, Sheet L-I .
October 26, 1999, Proposed Landscape Plan, Glenn Pate & Associates,
Sheet L-2.
September 4, 1999, Stormwater Management Plan (Church Site), Kenneth
H. Kruger, P.E.
7
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 84,2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
7. September 7, 1999 (date stamp), Conceptual Drainage Plan (Full Buildout),
Kenneth H. Kruger, P.E., Sheets 1-2.
August 5, 1999, Future Phase 2 Photometric Site Plan, Glenn Pate &
Associates, Sheet ESP 1 .O.
SECTION 6. All future amendments to the Christ Fellowship South Campus shall
8.
be approved by Resolution.
SECTION 7. Said approval shall be consistent with all representations made by
the applicant or applicant's agents at any workshop or public hearing.
SECTION 8. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption.
(The remainder of this page left intentionally blank)
8
r
Date Prepared: June 1,2005
Resolution 84,2005
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46 47
PASSED AND ADOPTED this day of ,2005.
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA
BY:
Joseph R. Russo, Mayor
ATTEST:
BY:
Patricia Snider, CMC, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
LEGAL SUFFICIENCY
BY:
Christine P. Tatum, City Attorney
VOTE:
MAYOR RUSSO
VICE MAYOR JABLIN
COUNCILMEMBER LEVY
COUNCILMEMBERVALECHE
COUNCILMEMBER BARNETT
-- AYE NAY ABSENT
---
G:\attorney-share\RESOLUTlONS\christ fellowship south campus - reso 84 2005.doc
9
City of Palm Beach Gardens
Special Council
Meeting Agenda
July 20,2005
Council Chambers
10500 N. Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 334 10
Mayor Rus so
Vice Mayor Jablin
Council Member Levy
Council Member Valeche
Council Member Barnett
r
d
I.
11.
111.
IV
V.
VI.
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
SPECIAL COUNCIL AGENDA
July 20,2005
7:OO P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
ADDITIONS, DELETIONS, MODIFICATIONS:
ANNOUNCEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS:
ITEMS OF RESIDENT INTEREST:
CITY MANAGER REPORT:
VII. COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC: (For Items Not on the Agenda, please submit
request form to the City Clerk prior to this Item)
VIII. CONSENT AGENDA:
IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS:
Part I - Ouasi-iudicial
a. {Staff Report on Page 5, Ordinance on Paee 136, Resolution on Page 141)
Ordinance 18, 2005 - (lst Reading) Approval of an amendment to the Christ
Fellowship North Campus Planned Unit Development (PUD). An Ordinance of
the City Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida rezoning a parcel of
land consisting of approximately 20 acres, located on the North side of Northlake
Boulevard approximately one mile West of Military Trail, as more particularly
described herein, from Residential Low Density-3 (RL3) to a Planned Unit
Development (PUD) overlay with an underlying zoning designation of
Residential Low Density-3 (RL3), to be included in the Christ Fellowship North
Campus Planned Unit Development (PUD); amending Ordinance 20, 1997 and
Ordinance 23, 1999 relating to the zoning for the Christ Fellowship North
Campus Planned Unit Development (PUD) to transfer the site plan approval and
related conditions to Resolution 83, 2005; amending the zoning district map; and
providing an effective date.
+I
3fAL"- $4
i
Resolution 83,2005 is a companion item to Ordinance 18,2005 and
will require Council action on second reading
Resolution 83, 2005 - Approval of a master development plan for the Christ
Fellowship North Campus PUD. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida approving an amendment to the Christ Fellowship
North campus Planned Unit Development (PUD), located on the North side of
Northlake Boulevard approximately one mile West of Military Trail, as more
particularly described herein, to incorporate an additional 20 acres and to allow
the development of a 159,180-square-foot expansion to the North Campus;
granting conditional use approval for the expanded Christ Fellowship Campus;
amending certain conditions of approval for the North Campus; providing for
waivers; providing for conditions of approval; and providing an effective date.
b. jStaff Kcport on Pa~c S, Ordin:inee 011 Pag~ 155, I<ewlution 011 l%ge 1601
Ordinance 19,2005 - (lst Reading) Approval of an amendment to the Conditional
Use approval for the Christ Fellowship South Campus. An Ordinance of the City
Council of the City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida amending Ordinance 30,
1990, Ordinance 34, 1999, and Ordinance 5 1, 1999 relating to the zoning for the
Christ Fellowship South Campus to transfer the conditional use approval and
related conditions to Resolution 84, 2005; and providing an effective date.
b.@
+I @de -+@-I
Resolution 84,2005 is a companion item to Ordinance 19,2005 and
will require Council action on second reading
Resolution 84,2005 - Approval of an amendment to the Site Plan approval for the
Chst Fellowship South Campus. A Resolution of the City Council of the City of
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida approving an amendment to the Christ Fellowship
South Campus conditional use and site plan approval, located on the South side of
Northlake Boulevard approximately one mile West of Military Trail, as more
particularly described herein, to allow for the deletion of a condition of approval;
and providing an effective date.
Part I1 - Non-Quasi-iudicial
X. RESOLUTIONS:
XI ORDINANCES: (For Consideration on First Reading)
XII. ITEMS FOR COUNCIL ACTION/DISCUSSION:
XIII. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT:
XIV. ADJOURNMENT
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE AND BE ADVISED that if any interested party wishes to appeal
any decision made by the City Council with respect to any matter considered at this public
hearing, such interested persons will need a record of the proceedings and may need to ensure
that a verbatim record is made, including the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is
to be based.
J
In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and Section 286.26, Florida Statutes,
persons with disabilities needing special accommodations in order to participate in this
proceeding are entitled to the provision of certain assistance at no cost. Please call the City
Clerk’s Office at 561-799-4122 no later than 5 days prior to the hearing if this assistance is
required. For hearing impaired assistance, please call the Florida Relay Service Numbers:
800-955-8 771 (TDD) or 800-955-8 770 (VOICE).
NOTE:
All presentation materials must be received by
the City Clerk prior to the presentation to the Council.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC 7L Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: zu QJc./ Subject: c hd AS k EyPw5,kJ lot. 1 cq p& I{d\\<h 1 ;) (, r Address: City: *I 8.G $1 33yI(% Members of the public may address the City Council during the ccComments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request-to-Address City Council c- * - ..- Please Print Name: Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print / City: Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print .I Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print / Name: Jdl. &%&J r Address: ma c&u3 Tree 0. City: 334P Subject: Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council ~ Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Name: Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: I Address: !Om- AN CLlXB id City: YBG Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Address: City: 7 W Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: I b1\1[5- 4 City: I ~ ~ Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: City: p&& J Subject: r, EES. ‘;3G/2@? c Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC
Request to Address City Council
Please PtM9
~
Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public”
portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City
Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting.
The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council c Please Print - Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print ,- ' n p, ' Name: '. ., 3s 1 1 \ i'\J"iL *'. \ i .- Members of the public may address the City Council during the "Comments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: *I MpnLf <-& --I~(?.,*~J k2:%Rl- e.,J,+rv c* QA 6" t2 ,)i ?") L+L 7/j3 . l,/?,bdi~'-< I, .+ ; .-- . 7: %-+]n'-r; II I -. r)l , f ,+;(-/:'I :C7.c #?/"L E- fl4-c , *- : ,1 # '3' - *f$ "f",-- C' 2: -7-y *f-J ( -2 ** -x I Memb rs o the public may address the City Council dhng thdComments by the Public" portion of the agenda and during "Public Hearings". This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Members oft address the Council during the “Comme portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Subject: ~~ ~ ~ ~ Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council 1 ‘f Please Print .L) ‘7 4, :,’ .JL , -+ / 1- -7‘ ’L Name: /?iyL. cs>9 p 7 p/<;’-T- 1- ‘ *- Address: - w City: Subject: 1 ’tr ,* .. ,.* ,‘ <. 4‘ 9. ’ ,. “-‘ fi +. * ”-* ‘; * L” I , Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: Address: City: U’ If Lg Subject: Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council t ,. Please Print >< .“- \ -i i - r\, ( - : \y-.+.4\ *.. \- 4 ~ \-- - -.+. Name: Address: > t I City: i t, . \#/ -.. c I) . * I. r- - (&, ’, i‘ .L Subject: -L4 Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Subject : Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
Comments from the Public Request to Address City Council Please Print Subject: Ordinance 18,2005 & Resolution 83,2005: Christ Fellowship North Campus PUD Amendment & Conditional Use Public Hearing and Ordinance 19,2005 & Resolution 84,2005: Christ Fellowship South Campus Condition Use and Site Plan Amendment. Members of the public may address the Planning & Zoning Board during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Please Print Name: 3ot3,N 0wmGkl Address: @ WlvTW m2f%e City: 4% Subject: Ua Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC Request to Address City Council Address: lh? 7 1 7, .I y. /oo City: F/. / / Subject: Members of the public may address the City Council during the “Comments by the Public” portion of the agenda and during “Public Hearings”. This Request to Address the City Council must be delivered to the City Clerk prior to the commencement of the meeting. The time limit for each speaker is limited to three (3) minutes.
Page 1 of 2
Kara Irwin
From: Kara Irwin
Sent:
II-
Wednesday, July 20, 2005 755 PM
To: Ron Ferris
cc: Christine Tatum; Talal Benothman; Michael Sanchez; Judy Dye; Dan Clark @ Ibfh; Nancy Stroud;
Mark Hendrickson; Ross Gilmore
Subject: Borland Center Planned Unit Development
Tracking: Recipient Read
Ron Ferris
Christine Tatum
Talal Benothman
Michael Sanchez
Judy Dye
Dan Clark @ lbfh
Nancy Stroud
Mark Hendrickson Read: 7/20/2005 7:56 PM
Ross Gilmore
Read: 7/20/2005 7:56 PM
Please be advised that staff refused to issue the permit for the vegetation clearing of the Palm Beach Community
ChurchlBorland Center site this afternoon. While the applicant has meet all of the requirements for issuance of the
clearing permit, it has come to our attention that the applicant will not be able to meet a condition of their
development order (Resolution 92, 2004) which requires that they install a flashing signal at the intersection of
Shady Lakes Drive and PGA Blvd by the deadline of August 5, 2005. It was staffs decision not to issue the
clearing permit due to the pending violation that would require shutting down the development of the site. The
violation must be resolved so that the site does not get cleared without the ability to move forward with vertical
construction. As you know, it has been an issue of concern in the past when sites are cleared and then sit vacant
for many months without the ability to start infrastructure improvements or vertical construction.
The applicant has instructed their traffic engineer to fast-track an application for the permitting of the signal, which
they have maintained will be ready by the end of this month for submittal. Staff has set an internal meeting on
Friday (07-22-05) at 10:30 a.m. to discuss what shall be required of the applicant in order to move forward with the
development of the site.
1 am informing you of this situation because the applicant is not happy that they are not getting their permit today
and may call your office to complain. If you require any further information on this issue please feel free to call me
at 723-3554.
Kara L. Irwin
Planning Manager
City of Palm Beach Gardens
10500 North Military Trail
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
T. 561-799-4242
F. 561-799-4281
7/20/2005
te Cad Description
2/12/01 01 14327 10-15 cars in east lot. Sent letter to Wu. No action.
3/30/02
Called dispatch about noise. They said there was a special permit I informed them of
parking permit and asked for info on other permit. Ultimately, Lt. ONeill called back anc
said they would be investigating because there was no permit for noise.
3/31/02 02032841
Called dispatch about 10 cars on Hunt Club Drive. Officer Joseph A. Corrao responded
He said there was nothing he could do. He could not enforce an agreement between
HOA and CF. I informed him that city code required that special events have adequate
on-site parking. He agreed to document but would not site CF or cars.
Called dispatch and asked them to contact code enforcement since Officer Corrao coulc
not help. Sgt Sheehan called back and let me know that code enforcment was
responding (Robert Cresden). He called back a second time to let me know that code
enforcement was issuing citations.
4/20/02 10-1 5 cars parked in overflow area on 10 acres
4/2 1 /02
Organized soccer game on 10 acres with a pastor and deacon supervising 10-20 kids
8/17/02 02-004498 Officer Thomas Gitto: Overtlow parking -100 cars in 10 acre east lot.
8/22/02 CF letter to Ron Ferris explaining that 8/17 parking was mistake. Won't happen again
without permit. (see not from Michelle L 8/29)
9/11/02 02-5000 50-100 cars on hunt club drive, traffic problems Sgt Andrew Spragg - I have a copy of
this report
9/14/02 02098838 4 cars in east lot. Gate locked, not worshipers according to sgt on scene at cf. Officer
Tiffany Bogard
9/22/02 car parked in east lot during Sunday service. Did not file complaint. Notified Kelvin via
email
9/29/02 car parked in east lot during Sunday service. Gate open during service. Car gone after
service. Left message for code enforcement. Got a return call from Kelvin on Monday.
He said warning letter was being sent. Discussed that shuttle buses are now being
parked in the 10 acre lot.
Letter to Wise confirming phone call about parking on east lot and written warning to CF
Also parking of large shuttle busses.
letter to Ferris requesting re positioning of no parking signs on Hunt Club Drive
2 cars on Hunt Club Drive during Saturday evening service - called 7:45pm - ofc M.
Neville #227
Rick Stewart called police about 2 cars on Hunt Club Drive - -9:15pm
Letter to Ferris (forward of 9/30 note) requesting "no parking" signs on entire length of
3/31/02 02022847
9/30/02
9/30/02
0/12/02 021 10205
0/12/02 021 10224
011 4/02
Hunt Club Drive - listing two police reports
1 car parked on Hunt Club Drive -10:30 - car was gone before police arrived - FL plate 0/27/02 021 16514
CASOX - Officer Thomas Gitto
1 1 am - van and truck parked in 10 acre lot. Called code enforcement
1 1 am - cf using large shuttle busses - called code enforcement.
-150 cars in east lot. Dispatch says they have permit. Pressed for copy. Call from ofc
Jeff Faulkmer (286) indicating no permit. Asked him to call code enforcement. He
indicated that Mr Ellis at CF said he had too many cars and needed to park them. ofc
Faulkmer gave Mr. Ellis my number and suggested he call me. I told him that was not
necessary and that code enforcement needed to be called. Email sent to Ron Ferris.
-1 50 cars in east lot. Dispatch said code enforcement had been called. Left message
for code enforcement. Also 1 car on Hunt Club Drive. Police put note on car saying
church requested they use lot.
filed report about vandalism of gazebo, entrance lights, tree branch, smashed pumpkins
officer Steven Fee
Notice of Violation sent to CF from Kelvin Wise for parking in 10 acre lot.
-100 cars in east lot plus a light and generator. Talked to officer Gitto. He spoke to Jim
Ellis who informed him it was life safety issue and he was parking cars there even
without permit and order to stop.
0/27/02
0/27/02
1 1 /3/02 021 19522
1/11/02 0226227
1 /13/02
1/16/02 02126200
1 111 7/02
12/8/02
1 /26/02
~ 2/2/02 ' 3/2/03
3/9/03
311 2/03
3/29/03
3/30/03
4/6/03
4/23/02
4/26/03
313 1 104
026438
02136790
0301 2308
03015418
03028222
03030922
-100 cars in east lot.
Blue van parked on Hunt Club Drive - 12pm -tag 1M9 96E
Four cars parked in east lot. Left message for code enforcement also.
Blue van parked on Hunt Club Drive - 12pm -tag IM9 96E
Black Nissan Pathfinder V80 RXK. Police could not contact owner. No ticket issued.
Silver Eclipse (FL-T48 NVU), Brown Jeep Cherokee (CT 867 RNY) west side of Hunt
Club Drive. Officer Shackleford (PBG PD) approached as I was logging license
numbers. He informed me it was already called in but could not supply a call number. I
called dispatch and got the call number. I received a return call from Lt. ONeil and we
discuseed my concerns.
75+ cars on Hunt Club Drive, Joe Madden from code enforcement came out. Also two
police officers (sgt and officer Richard Moretti). - sent letter to Ron Ferris on 3113.
'03039205 White Minivan parked on Hunt Club Drive (Reed)
03039477 8 cars on east side, 1 on west of Hunt Club Drive
03042561 6 cars in east lot. Also called code enforcement
03049891 Loitering teens called in by Rick Stewart
03051228 50 cars in east lot. Dispatch did not want to give call number without meeting officer.
03032380
(Spoke to sgt Thomas to get call number
IO3051438 150-1 00 cars in east lot. 10:45am .___ __
'04043392 ]Car parked on east side of Hunt Club Urie
My name is Don Paulus. My address is 112
Monterey Pointe Drive, Palm Beach Gardens,
Florida, 33418. I am a member of the Board of
Governors of the PGA National Property Owners
Association. The Board supports the Northlake
Neighborhood Coalition. We urge you to vote
no to Christ Fellowship’s request to triple the
size of its facility. A mistake was made 8 years
ago when City Council approved the placement - ‘.,, of a “mega church” in the midst of purely
residential communities. Today, you are being
asked to approve the creation of a larger
“Cultural, Entertainment, and Recreational”.
zj‘j L c c i J n-
/4/2d/?/b x E
’/ ‘bid\ F,
I, I ” ti t‘ commercial enterprise which city staff now
classifies as being within the category of
When the north campus was approved, Christ
Fellowship told us they needed the space, and
they could put everything on the north side of
Northlake. Today they fill the north and south
campuses and are asking us to believe that they
need the expansion to put nearly everything on
the north side of Northlake. It won’t be long
before the north side is full as well, I urge you to
vote no and to not compound the mistake of 8
years ago. Thank you.
PIE /of<
/-
PUBLIC HEARINGS: XXK - =
P Quasi-Judicial SI ummary
Title Read:
Hearing Opened:
Ex-Parte:JB DL JR HV EJ
Staff Presentation:
Pet it ioner presentat ion:
Hearing Closed:
Bring back for discussion:-
Motion:
I Vote:
, *norno -* fiP-,':mnn(." p.. qmmm '&?<.
' **4 n.- -- /\n OPP - _- Ordinance 18, 2005 - (1'
Reading) Approval of an amendment to the Christ
Fellowship North Campus Planned Unit Development
(PUD). An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of
Palm Beach Gardens, Florida rezoning a parcel of land
consisting of approximately 20 acres, located on the
North side of Northlake Boulevard approximately one
mile West of Military Trail, as more particularly
described herein, from Residential Low Density-3
(Rc3) to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay
with an underlying zoning designation of Residential
Low Density-3 (RL3), to be included in the Christ
Fellowship North Campus Planned Unit Development
(PUD); amending Ordinance 20, 1997 and Ordinance
23, 1999 relating to the zoning for the Christ Fellowship
North Campus Planned Unit Development (PUD) to
transfer the site plan approval and related conditions to
Resolution 83,2005; amending the zoning district map;
and providing an effective date.
- -- -- - - - -- -
Resolution 83,2005 is a companion item to
will require Council action on second reading
Ordinance 18,2005 and
Resolution 83, 2005 - Approval of a master
development plan for the Christ Fellowship North
Campus PUD. A Resolution of the City Council of the
City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida approving an
amendment to the Christ Fellowship North campus
Planned Unit Development (PUD), located on the North
side of Northlake Boulevard approximately one mile
West of Military Trail, as more particularly described
herein, to incorporate an additional 20 acres and to
allow the development of a 159,180-square-foot
expansion to the North Campus; granting conditional
use approval for the expanded Christ Fellowship
Campus; amending certain conditions of approval for
the North Campus; providing for waivers; providing for
conditions of approval; and providing an effective date.
TO: Mayor/Council DATE: June 30,2005
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Patricia Snider, City Clerk &'
Christ Fellowship Expansion -- Facsimile
Attached please fmd a letter from Thomas J. Baird, P.A., received via facsimile
requesting that Christ Fellowship be permitted to present its application on July 20th
followed by staff presentation and/or public comment. He states the hearing could be
continued to a date certain in August when the Coalition's experts and representatives
can be present.
This item is currently on the July 7, 2005 agenda under the City Manager report. The
recommendation will be to proceed with first reading of Ordinance 18, 2005 and
Ordinance 19,2005 on July 20,2005 as discussed at the last Council meeting.
If you have any questions, please contact the City Manager at 799-41 10.
W29f 2fNS 15: 33 561625fl610 , .k
Thomm J. bird
For Thomas J. Bakd, PA
Attest:
CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, the National Association of Town Watch (NATW) is sponsoring the nationwide crime,
drug and violence prevention program on August 2, 2005 entitled "National Night Out':· and
WHEREAS, the "22M Annual National Night Out" provides an opportunity for the City of Palm
Beach Gardens to join forces with thousands of other communities across the country in promoting
cooperative, police-community crime prevention efforts; and
WHEREAS, Palm Beach Gardens Police, Fire Rescue and Community Services Departments play
a vital role in drug prevention and crime prevention with the youth of our community; and
WHEREAS, Palm Beach Gardens Police, Fire Rescue and . Community Services Departments are
supporting "National Night Out 2005" locally,· and
WHEREAS, it is essential that all citizens of Palm Beach Gardens be aware of the importance of
crime prevention programs and the impact that their participation can have on reducing crime,
drugs and violence in the City of Palm Beach Gardens; and
WHEREAS, police-community partnerships, neighborhood safety, awareness and cooperation are
important themes of the "National Night Out" program;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Joseph R. Russo, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Mayor of the
City of Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, do hereby proclaim August 2, 2005, as
THE 22'"1 ANNUAL NATIONAL NIGHT OUT
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set
my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Palm
Beach Gardens, Florida, to be affixed on this 21st
day of July in ear Two Tlwusand and Five.