HomeMy WebLinkAboutDRC - 081307 - Paloma PUD Amendment1 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
2 DRC PALOMA PUD AMENDMENT
3 MINUTES
4 September 13, 2007
5
6 Present at Meeting
7 Nina Nikolova, Planning Specialist, Growth Management
8 Steve Mayer, Planner, Growth Management
9 Officer Jules Barone, Crime Prevention, Police Department
10 Mark Hendrickson, City Forester
11 Doug Wise, Chief Building Official, Building Department
12 Jim Orth, Assistant City Engineer
13 Anne Booth, Urban Design Studio
14 JeffM., Taylor Woodrow Communities
15
16 Place: Council Chambers
17 Date: Thursday, September 13, 2007
18
19 Purpose of the Meeting
20 Paloma PUD Amendment: Parcel A
21
22 Comments
23
24 Seacoast Utility Authority
25 • There were no comments.
26
27 Fire Department
28 • There were no comments.
29
30 Police Department
31 Officer Jules Barone, Crime Prevention Officer
32 • Lighting issues with placement of landscaping, placement of landscaping must not be in
33 conflict with any lighting such as light bulbs on ground or on building.
34 • Any long-term landscape growth should not be in conflict with lighting .
35 • Discussed wording of comments, clarification was made. Not all of the landscaping needs to
36 be installed or field located around all of the lighting prior to the first Certificate of
37 Occupancy. Only the first field will be reviewed.
38 • Lighting indicated on site plan will need to be reflected more clearly. Discussed lighting and
39 photometric level requirements as well as current lighting codes.
40 • Discussed current lighting codes requirement.
41 • Visit to site indicated that we do not expect to have any problems with meeting current
42 lighting codes.
-I-Development Review Committee Meeting Minutes 091307
1 • Discussed window panes shall not be located less than 40 inches away form any locking
2 mechanism unless burglary resistant/impact glaze is used, does not necessarily need to be
3 both. However, if no burglary resistant/impact glaze is used then window panes shall not be
4 located less than 40 inches from any locking mechanism.
5 • Illumination for garage doors will need to use photocell and sensor other than just a light
6 switch.
7
8 Building Department
9 Doug Wise, Chief Building Official, Building Department
10 • There have been changes to cost estimate. New estimates will be submitted for review.
11 • Pending determination by planning and zoning if photometric plan is required will need to
12 submit for review.
13 • Platted lots may need to be re-platted. Subtitle with plat overlay was not received. Plat to be
14 revised to remove all lot lines then will be re-submitted, currently under revision and will be
15 submitted separately.
16
17 City Engineer
18 Jim Orth, Engineer
19 • Discussed reconfiguration of units from townhouse to condominiums affects Federal Fair
20 Housing Act, chapter 11 of Florida Building code.
21 • Discussed parking field's requirements if guest and visitor spaces are provided must provide
22 one accessible parking space for each building, a total of 14 spaces will need to be provided in
23 visitor parking fields. Suggest conducting analysis regarding parking issue.
24 • Provide accessible parking graphic demonstration of where spaces will be placed on property,
25 or provide justification.
26 • Site light that is not owned by FPL will require its own permit.
27 • Garage doors with photo sensor will require switch as well as photo cell .
28
29 City Forester
30 Mark Hendrickson, City Forester
31 • Discussed landscaping based on original approval plans.
32 • Need to place more trees and palms back into common areas.
33 • Discussed intent on preserving no net loss regarding previously approved plans for units
34 which provided plenty of landscaping between buffers and preserves. All trees and
35 landscaping in original plan is to be placed and added back into site plans.
3 6 • Proposal for two easements that will go on both sides of driveway will be illuminating lines
3 7 and easement will not be visible this will not work, will need to reconfigure the line in this
38 area to make it clean.
39 • Discussed removal of comments from Seacoast Utilities .
40 • All lighting on site will need to be reflected on plan and landscape plan.
41
-2-Development Review Committee Meeting Minutes 091307
1 Planning & Zoning
2 Nina Nikolova, Planning Specialist
3 • Requested all plans needing to be signed and sealed. Wrong plans were sent in.
4 • Signed plans and sealed plans will be submitted. Specifically Architectural plans.
5 • Regarding 6 foot clearing and lots adjacent to each other rather than to common area open
6 spaces, analysis will be submitted and reflected on the site plan rather than on the typical.
7 • Discussed corrections and adjustments to be made to site plans to read more clearly and
8 consistently based on Planning & Zoning comments.
9 • Mark Hendrickson, City Forester discussed preserves located between site and Central
10 Boulevard.
11 • Request was made for name to be re-added to entry sign on alternate side of street so as to
12 have name visible from both sides of street and all intersection will have name Paloma. Photos
13 will be submitted with request.
14
15 The meeting was adjourned.
16
17 Submitted by:
18
19 /J d/
20 = 21 PatriciaSnider,CMC
22 City Clerk
23
24 Note: These action minutes are prepared in compliance with 286.011 F .S. and are not verbatim transcripts of the
25 meeting.
-3-Development Review Committee Meeting Minutes 091307
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING
DRC PALOMA PUD AMENDMENT
MINUTES
September 13, 2007
Present at Meeting
Nina Nikolova, Planning Specialist, Growth Management
Steve Mayer, Planner, Growth Management
Officer Jules Barone, Crime Prevention, Police Department
Mark Hendrickson, City Forester
Doug Wise, Chief Building Official, Building Department
Jim Orth, Assistant City Engineer
Anne Booth, Urban Design Studio
Jeff M., Taylor Woodrow Communities
Place: Council Chambers
Date: Thursday, September 13, 2007
Purpose of the Meeting
Paloma PUD Amendment: Parcel A
Comments
Seacoast Utility Authority
• There were no comments.
Fire Department
• There were no comments.
Police Department
Officer Jules Barone, Crime Prevention Officer
• Lighting issues with placement of landscaping, placement of landscaping must not be in
conflict with any lighting such as light bulbs on ground or on building.
• Any long -term landscape growth should not be in conflict with lighting.
• Discussed wording of comments, clarification was made. Not all of the landscaping needs to
be installed or field located around all of the lighting prior to the first Certificate of
Occupancy. Only the first field will be reviewed.
• Lighting indicated on site plan will need to be reflected more clearly. Discussed lighting and
photometric level requirements as well as current lighting codes.
• Discussed current lighting codes requirement.
• Visit to site indicated that we do not expect to have any problems with meeting current
lighting codes.
-I- Development Review Committee Meeting Minutes 091307
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
• Discussed window panes shall not be located less than 40 inches away form any locking
mechanism unless burglary resistant /impact glaze is used, does not necessarily need to be
both. However, if no burglary resistant /impact glaze is used then window panes shall not be
located less than 40 inches from any locking mechanism.
• Illumination for garage doors will need to use photocell and sensor other than just a light
switch.
Building Department
Doug Wise, Chief Building Official, Building Department
• There have been changes to cost estimate. New estimates will be submitted for review.
• Pending determination by planning and zoning if photometric plan is required will need to
submit for review.
• Platted lots may need to be re- platted. Subtitle with plat overlay was not received. Plat to be
revised to remove all lot lines then will be re- submitted, currently under revision and will be
submitted separately.
City Engineer
Jim Orth, Engineer
• Discussed reconfiguration of units from townhouse to condominiums affects Federal Fair
Housing Act, chapter 11 of Florida Building code.
• Discussed parking field's requirements if guest and visitor spaces are provided must provide
one accessible parking space for each building, a total of 14 spaces will need to be provided in
visitor parking fields. Suggest conducting analysis regarding parking issue.
• Provide accessible parking graphic demonstration of where spaces will be placed on property,
or provide justification.
• Site light that is not owned by FPL will require its own permit.
• Garage doors with photo sensor will require switch as well as photo cell.
City Forester
Mark Hendrickson, City Forester
• Discussed landscaping based on original approval plans.
• Need to place more trees and palms back into common areas.
• Discussed intent on preserving no net loss regarding previously approved plans for units
which provided plenty of landscaping between buffers and preserves. All trees and
landscaping in original plan is to be placed and added back into site plans.
• Proposal for two easements that will go on both sides of driveway will be illuminating lines
and easement will not be visible this will not work, will need to reconfigure the line in this
area to make it clean.
• Discussed removal of comments from Seacoast Utilities.
• All lighting on site will need to be reflected on plan and landscape plan.
-2- Development Review Committee Meeting Minutes 091307
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Planning; & Zoning
Nina Nikolova, Planning Specialist
• Requested all plans needing to be signed and sealed. Wrong plans were sent in.
• Signed plans and sealed plans will be submitted. Specifically Architectural plans.
• Regarding 6 foot clearing and lots adjacent to each other rather than to common area open
spaces, analysis will be submitted and reflected on the site plan rather than on the typical.
• Discussed corrections and adjustments to be made to site plans to read more clearly and
consistently based on Planning & Zoning comments.
• Mark Hendrickson, City Forester discussed preserves located between site and Central
Boulevard.
• Request was made for name to be re -added to entry sign on alternate side of street so as to
have name visible from both sides of street and all intersection will have name Paloma. Photos
will be submitted with request.
The meeting was adjourned.
Submitted by:
Patricia Snider, CMC
City Clerk
Note: These action minutes are prepared in compliance with 286.011 F.S. and are not verbatim transcripts of the
meeting.
-3- Development Review Committee Meeting Minutes 091307